Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026.07.27 Council MinutesMINUTES City Council Workshop Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, July 27, 2026 Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar MEETING INSTRUCTIONS FOR REMOTE ACCESS -Individuals, who would like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so (website thevia City’s onlinethe out filling by form www.pasco- wa.gov/publiccomment) to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this workshop. The Pasco City Council Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum atstreamed and Richland Cable Pascoin and www.pasco- wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco. To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-332-249-0718 and use access code 981 152 572#. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Servicio de intéprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dias antes para la disponiblidad. (Spanish language dos garantizar interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.) CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Charles Grimm, Mayor. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present:Abel Campos, Joe Cotta, Mark Figueroa,Calixto Hernandez, Leo Perales, David Milne; and Charles Grimm Councilmembers attending remotely: Councilmembers absent: Staff present: Harold Stewart, City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager; Page 1 of 17 Angela Pashon, Interim Parks & Recreation Director; Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief; Kevin Hebdon, Finance Director; Drew Pollom, City Attorney; Craig Raymond, Deputy Community & Economic Development Director; Brent Cook, Police Chief; and Gabriela Sanchez, City Clerk The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. OATH OF OFFICE - POLICE CHIEF Mayor Grimm administered the Oath of Office to Police Chief, Brent Cook. The Mayor called a 9 minute recess to allow for photos at 7:06 PM. The meeting resumed at 7:15 PM. EXECUTIVE SESSION Council adjourned into Executive Session at 7:15 PM for 20 minutes returning at 7:35 PM to discuss current or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) with the City Manager, Deputy City Manager, and City Attorney. At 7:35 PM Mayor Grimm announced that the Executive Session would continue for another 5 minutes or until 7:40 PM. Mayor Grimm called the meeting back to order at 7:40 PM. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmember Perales recognized the successful unveiling of the Peanuts statue at the park, thanking Seth Vandable, the Pasco Arts and Culture Commission, and past council members for their support of the project. He noted that the statue has enhanced the park and encouraged the community to visit it. Mayor Pro Tem Milne highlighted the successful unveiling of the Peanuts statue, commending those involved in bringing the project to completion, including City staff, community members, and former councilmembers. Mayor Pro Tem noted the strong community attendance and expressed appreciation for seeing the long-envisioned project become a reality. He also reported attending the grand opening and ribbon- cutting for the Home2 Suites by Hilton near the Pasco Airport, recognizing the investment in new lodging accommodations and noting the attendance of City staff, Port of Pasco commissioners, and community partners. He commented that new hotel development supports tourism and visitation to Pasco and the Tri-Cities. Councilmember Hernandez reported attending the Peanuts statue unveiling and noted the strong community turnout and positive atmosphere. He also highlighted the Farmers Market following the event, stating that both activities were well attended and contributed to a successful community event. Page 2 of 17 Mayor Grimm thanked fellow councilmembers for attending recent community events on their behalf while they were volunteering to prepare meals for church groups from across the Tri-Cities. He expressed appreciation for the continued commitment of the Council to serving the community. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Presentation - Cannabis - Revenue & Licenses City Attorney Pollom introduced a presentation regarding cannabis licensing regulations and revenue, with Aaron Washington from the Washington State Liquor information additional to attendance provide Board Cannabis and in regarding the state licensing process. The presentation provided an overview of the state’s cannabis licensing framework, established through Initiative 502, and explained that the Liquor and Cannabis Board regulates cannabis retailers, producers, and processors. Staff currently retail cannabis permits Pasco the City that explained of establishments only and does not allow cannabis producers or processors. Under the City’s municipal code, Pasco allows up to four cannabis retail licenses, including one social equity license. All four available retail licenses are currently in use. Staff noted that the state originally allocated Pasco up to four retail licenses and that any future changes to local limits would not create additional state-issued licenses. The presentation included information regarding the state’s social equity cannabis licensing program, which was created to provide licensing opportunities for individuals impacted by historical barriers to participation in the cannabis industry. Staff noted that additional state licensing opportunities are not expected to become available outside of the social equity program until approximately 2032. Deputy City Manager Sigel provided an update regarding cannabis revenue received by the City. Staff is working with the Washington State Department of Revenue allocations determine and revenue cannabis verify and review to whether any discrepancies exist. Additional information is expected by the end of August or early September. Staff explained that because Pasco currently allows only retail cannabis sales, the City receives approximately 1.5% of applicable cannabis revenue allocations, along with potential per-capita distribution. Staff reviewed options available to Council, including maintaining the current cannabis regulations, increasing the retail cap, allowing cannabis producers and processors guidance, and studies additional or City, the within requesting to changes any that noted Staff these of combination a pursuing options. cannabis regulations would require coordination with the Liquor and Cannabis Board, review by the Planning Commission, public hearings, and formal Council action. Page 3 of 17 Aaron Washington, Program Manager with the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board’s Social Equity Program, thanked the Council and indicated he was available to answer questions and provide additional details regarding the state’s cannabis licensing and social equity programs. Mayor Pro Tem Milne asked staff to clarify whether the approximately $41,500 in cannabis revenue represented the amount received by the City in the prior year. Deputy City Manger Sigdel confirmed that the figure was the previous year's amount State Washington the audit with the that explained and ongoing the its receiving is City that Revenue to intended is of Department verify appropriate allocation. She further explained that, similar to other state collected taxes, only a portion of taxes generated within the City are distributed back to the City. the was amount revenue that Pro expressed Tem concern Mayor significantly lower than what had originally been anticipated when cannabis was legalized, noting that the funding would not have a substantial impact on major City expenses. Deputy City Manager acknowledged that while significant taxes are generated through cannabis sales, the distribution of those revenues is determined by state law. Councilmember social the regarding equity requested Figueroa clarification cannabis licensing process and how it differs from the traditional cannabis licensing process. Aaron Washington with the WA State Liquor and Cannabis Board explained that prior to the social equity program, applicants participated in a process that included a lottery and merit based system. He explained that the social equity program, established in 2020, created an eligibility and scoring process designed to prioritize individuals disproportionately impacted by the enforcement of cannabis laws. Applicants must meet specific qualifications, and a third-party contractor evaluates applications using a scoring rubric to determine eligibility and priority. Washington clarified that meeting social equity eligibility requirements does not guarantee issuance of a cannabis license, it only allows an applicant to proceed through the separate cannabis licensing process. Washington explained that applicants must still meet all licensing requirements, including securing funding, obtaining a suitable location, and receiving approval through the applicable local jurisdiction. The liquor and Cannabis Board notifies the city, county, or town when an applicant proposes a cannabis business location, allowing the local authority an opportunity to provide input or objections. He noted that while the board has authority to proceed with licensing, local concerns and objections are considered during the process. Washington also explained that there is no required timeframe for social equity applicants to complete the licensing process. The timeline varies depending on factors such as obtaining capital, securing real estate, and identifying an eligible location that complies with zoning requirements and buffer restrictions. Social equity applicants may pursue locations throughout Washington State where cannabis businesses are permitted. Councilmember Campos asked whether the social equity cannabis licensing process is more difficult to obtain than the traditional licensing process. Aaron Washington explained that the social equity process includes additional eligibility Page 4 of 17 requirements and a scoring rubric designed to identify applicants who have been disproportionately impacted by cannabis enforcement. He noted that while eligibility determination may be challenging, applicants often face additional location. approved an and estate, in capital, securing obstacles real Councilmember Campos also asked how the City's original allocation of four cannabis retail licenses was determined. Washington explained that allocations were geographic considerations density and on population primarily based established by the state prior to the creation of the social equity program. He noted may applicants program, equity select current the under that social locations anywhere in Washington State where cannabis businesses are allowed, subject to local regulations. Councilmember Campos asked whether Pasco would have received a larger allocation if the City's current population had been used during the original allocation process. Washington explained that allocations were determined using a formula established by the Office of Financial Management and that he could not speculate on how the current population would have impacted the original allocation. Mayor Grimm called for public comment Zachary LLC, Cannabis Compass of and resident Pasco Fairley, co-owner addressed the Council regarding the company’s social equity cannabis retail license application. Mr. Fairley stated that Compass Cannabis chose Pasco because it is their community and expressed their desire to establish a business that the City and residents could be proud of. Mr. Fairley shared that the proposed location is 5804 Road 90, the former Green2Go location, and noted that the property has operated as a cannabis retail location for nearly three years. He stated made personal significant has financial ownership the that group commitments, including personal guarantees and financing, to pursue the community to listen to efforts company’s the emphasized He opportunity. feedback and work collaboratively with neighbors and the property owner. Mr. Fairley highlighted the purpose of the social equity program, stating that it creates opportunities for individuals who historically have faced barriers to entering the cannabis industry. He expressed that a successful, locally owned social equity retailer in Pasco could reflect positively on the City’s growth and commitment to creating that stating by concluded opportunities Mr. residents. for Fairley Compass Cannabis intends to be a responsible business, a good neighbor, and a positive member of the Pasco community. Steve Guerrillo, Pasco resident, addressed the Council regarding the potential establishment of a cannabis retail business in the City. Mr. Guerrillo shared his personal born in raised and the was noting that Pasco, to connection he community, attended local schools, and participated in youth sports programs at the structure, with credited he providing Center, King Luther Martin which mentorship, and valuable life skills during his childhood. Mr. Guerrillo stated that he intends to build a locally owned business in the community that supported him growing shared He operation. outside an bringing than rather up his in professional experience as a sales director for a large cannabis producer and processor in Seattle and noted his background in cannabis consulting for venture capital firms nationwide. Mr. Guerrillo expressed his desire to operate a clean, Page 5 of 17 professional cannabis retail business in Pasco and committed to giving back to the community by donating a portion of sales proceeds to youth sports programs at the Martin Luther King Center. Adam Bonus, a West Richland resident and lead pastor of Grace Church Tri- Cities in Pasco, spoke in support of maintaining the City’s current cannabis regulations (Option One). Mr. Bonus expressed concerns regarding expanding cannabis availability, stating that while the industry promotes economic benefits such as revenue and jobs, he believes there are potential social and public health impacts that should also be considered. Mr. Bonus discussed concerns regarding increased cannabis potency compared to previous decades and cited research linking high-potency cannabis use with mental health concerns. He referenced the economic impacts associated with mental health challenges in Washington State and questioned whether expanding cannabis access could contribute to additional community impacts. Mr. Bonus stated that his church supports a thriving and flourishing Pasco community but expressed his belief that additional cannabis retail current the compared goal. that He align not would locations with understanding of cannabis impacts to past changes in public perception regarding tobacco use and encouraged the Council to consider potential long-term effects, particularly amid existing mental health challenges. Samuel Alaniz, Pasco resident, addressed the Council in support of a social equity cannabis retail opportunity. Mr. Alaniz shared his longstanding connection to the community, noting that he was born and raised in the area, raised his children in Pasco, operated a local business, and has worked in sales and marketing throughout the Tri-Cities for more than 30 years. Mr. Alaniz stated that he values trust, honesty, and treating people with respect, and that he intends to bring those values to his role as general manager if the business is approved. He noted that he would oversee daily operations, serve as a point of contact for customers, neighbors, and employees, and use his bilingual English and Spanish skills to better serve the community. Mr. Alaniz highlighted that the proposed business would represent local ownership, diversity, and opportunity, describing it as Washington State’s first African-American veteran and Hispanic-owned social equity business create to plans the He stated business. cannabis that approximately 15 to 25 local jobs and operate as a professional and responsible community business. Mr. Alaniz acknowledged concerns that the City may already have sufficient cannabis retailers but expressed his belief that there is room for additional local ownership opportunities. He noted that an existing Pasco cannabis business owner supports the proposal and does not believe it would negatively impact current operations. He also emphasized that the proposed location has already operated successfully as a licensed cannabis retail location. Mr. Alaniz concluded by asking the Council to support the opportunity for local residents to own and operate the business, stating his commitment to earning the community’s trust through responsible operations and service. Councilmember Cotta spoke in opposition to approving an additional cannabis retailer in Pasco. He stated that the City had previously established its policy following public input and argued that changing the policy without new public engagement or updated impact studies was unwarranted. He also contended that Page 6 of 17 the existing market demand for cannabis retailers has already been met. Councilmember Cotta expressed concerns about the potential impacts of additional cannabis retailers on public health, youth, and neighborhoods. He described observations from the area near a previous cannabis retailer on Road 90, stating that individuals congregated near the business and created safety concerns for students walking to nearby schools. He referenced a Washington State study that he said found an association between living near cannabis retailers and higher rates of cannabis use disorder, particularly among youth, and argues health mental increased to additional could retailers that contribute concerns and normalize cannabis use. Councilmember Cotta urged the Council not to expand the number of cannabis retailers, stating that doing so would help protect youth and the broader community from potential negative consequences. He concluded by sharing his religious perspective, citing a passage from the Bible and encouraging Council members to consider their faith when making their decision, expressing his belief that promoting cannabis is inconsistent with biblical teachings. Councilmember Perales stated that his proposal to increase the cannabis retailer cap was based on maintaining consistency with City policy rather than generating additional opposed cannabis originally allowing he Although had revenue. retailers in Pasco, he said his observations since their establishment have not shown significant negative community impacts. He cited police service data indicating relatively few calls for service associated with cannabis retailers, noting that many calls involved incidents affecting the businesses rather than criminal activity related to cannabis. Councilmember Perales compared cannabis and alcohol, its despite normalized socially become has alcohol that arguing documented health and public safety impacts. He referenced publicly available data on alcohol-related deaths and traffic fatalities, stating that comparable statistics for cannabis are not available. He emphasized personal responsibility, expressing that individuals should make their own choices while parents should educate their children about substance use. He stated that increasing the number of cannabis retailers would support job creation, economic activity, and business opportunities in Pasco. He also noted the potential for additional social equity cannabis and minority veterans by including businesses licenses, owned entrepreneurs, and highlighted the success of an existing local social equity retailer. He acknowledged that cannabis products provide medical benefits for some individuals, including those with PTSD, cancer, and other conditions. Concluding his remarks, Councilmember Perales expressed support for increasing the retailer cap to eight, which would allow four additional social equity licenses, citing economic development and employment opportunities as his primary reasons. Councilmember Figueroa stated that the discussion involved personal views for many people but emphasized that the Council's role is to establish and amend City policy. He expressed support for increasing the cannabis retailer cap by one additional retailer while also establishing a future population-based density cap to guide any additional expansion as the city grows. He noted that cannabis retail has been legal in Washington since 2012 and has been permitted in Pasco since 2023, stating that the current Council has an opportunity to refine the City's policy Page 7 of 17 for long-term growth. He said any additional retailer should be limited to a social equity drugs, on war of impacts the the discussed and license historical particularly on communities of color, stating that the social equity program is intended to address some of those inequities. Councilmember Figueroa also stated that Council members should not legislate based on personal religious beliefs He own his shared decisions. make objective instead but policy experiences growing up in a community affected by crime and drug activity and argued that cannabis retailers are highly regulated businesses. He expressed greater concern about youth access to nicotine vape products than licensed cannabis retailers. In closing, Councilmember Figueroa encouraged the Council to adopt a measured approach by increasing the retailer cap by one, establishing long-term growth guidelines tied to population, and limiting the additional retailer to a social equity license. He stated that he did not support increasing the cap to eight retailers and believed a gradual expansion represented a balanced and responsible policy approach. Mayor Pro Tem Milne stated that he served on the Council when the City first considered allowing cannabis retailers, describing the issue as highly divisive. He explained that he had voted to limit cannabis retailers to industrial areas, but the Council ultimately approved allowing them citywide. He stated that he opposed the proposal at that time and continues to oppose expanding the number of cannabis retailers. Mayor Pro Tem Milne expressed concerns about the public impacts of marijuana use, noting that he has encountered marijuana smoke in parks and other public places and finds it disruptive. He stated that these experiences contributed to his opposition to increasing the retailer cap. In closing, Mayor Pro Tem Milne said he respected the discussion and differing viewpoints expressed by Council members but indicated that he would vote against the proposal while acknowledging that the Council would ultimately decide the issue by majority vote. Councilmember Cotta thanked the Council for the respectful discussion and offered additional comments in opposition to increasing the number of cannabis retailers. He argued that cannabis differs from alcohol in its effects on the body and referenced studies that he said associate marijuana use with increased risks of psychosis, suicide, and adverse outcomes for youth. He cited statistics that he said showed higher rates of daily marijuana use among teens and linked youth cannabis use to lower academic performance, reduced educational attainment, and decreased graduation rates. He maintained that increasing the number of cannabis retailers could contribute to greater youth exposure and use. In closing, Councilmember should moral include policy stated that Cotta public considerations and that the Council has a responsibility to prioritize the health, safety, and well-being of the community when making policy decisions. Councilmember Hernandez stated that there are many differing statistics and personal opinions regarding cannabis but emphasized that the Council's decision should Councilmember with expressed He agreement on based be policy. Figueroa's proposal to increase the cannabis retailer cap by one, stating that increasing Councilmember the cap to eight retailers would be excessive. Hernandez shared that, based on his personal observations, he does not view Page 8 of 17 cannabis retailers as problematic. He stated that he has seen individuals using cannabis for medicinal purposes and observed customers with medical conditions purchasing cannabis products, rather than the type of activity described by opponents of the proposal. He also commented that personal beliefs and morality vary among individuals and suggested they should not be the primary basis for the Council's decision. He encouraged the Council to focus on sound public policy and business considerations, ultimately expressing his support for increasing the retailer cap by one additional license. Mayor Grimm stated that, while he is not inherently opposed to personal or medicinal marijuana use, he does not support increasing the number of cannabis retailers in Pasco. He acknowledged that existing retailers may not generate a high volume of police calls but expressed concern about secondary impacts, citing incidents such as a vehicle crashing into a cannabis retailer and the location of a retailer near a driver education business. Mayor Grimm also compared the discussion to broader community planning decisions, including the potential for additional casinos, and questioned whether increasing the number of cannabis retailers aligns with the type of community the Council wants to foster. He stated that the City already has a social equity cannabis license and expressed concern that increasing the retailer cap could lead to additional expansions in the future. In closing, future control cannot City the all that, stated Grimm Mayor while development, it can decide whether to increase the number of cannabis retailers. He said he opposed the proposal, believing the Council should avoid expanding uses that could contribute to additional community impacts. Councilmember Campos stated that the issue before the Council was not whether cannabis should be legal in Pasco, as that decision had already been made by a previous Council, but whether the City's retailer cap should be amended. He said his focus was on determining whether the City's population and community needs supported an additional retailer. Councilmember Campos acknowledged his own personal convictions about cannabis but emphasized that his responsibility was to represent the community and had not received significant opposition to adding one additional retailer. He concluded that, while he was not convinced the City needed a larger expansion, he supported option two, which would increase the cannabis retailer cap by one additional retailer, stating that he believed it reflected the feedback he had received from residents. Councilmember Figueroa encouraged the Council to consider the long-term policy implications of its decision rather than focusing solely on the current vote. He reiterated his support for increasing the cannabis retailer cap by one additional social equity license while establishing a population-based cap that would prevent further expansion until Pasco experiences significant population growth. He stated that this approach would provide long-term policy certainty, preserve local control, and ensure that future increases in the retailer cap would occur only after deliberate He public discussion and demonstrated community growth. emphasized that his proposal was not an endorsement of cannabis use but rather an effort to create a measured, balanced policy that addresses current needs while limiting future expansion. Councilmember Figueroa also discussed the purpose of Washington's social equity cannabis program, noting that the cannabis Page 9 of 17 industry has historically lacked diversity in business ownership. He stated that allowing one additional social equity retailer would create opportunities for to approach controlled a underrepresented while entrepreneurs maintaining expansion. In closing, Councilmember Figueroa stated that the Council should focus on decisions within its authority, adopt a policy that balances community concerns with economic opportunity, and establish clear guidelines that provide stability and predictability for future Councils and the community. Councilmember by increasing approach Perales a suggested compromise cannabis retailer cap by two additional social equity licenses rather than one. He also expressed support for incorporating a population based threshold into the ordinance that would allow a future Council to consider additional cannabis retailers after the City's population increases by approximately 20,000 to 25,000 residents. He stated that this approach could provide a balanced solution by allowing limited expansion while establishing a framework for future consideration based on population growth rather than authorizing a larger increase immediately. Mayor Grimm asked whether a future Council could amend or remove a proposed density cap before the population threshold was reached. City Attorney Drew Pollom confirmed that a future Council could amend or repeal the regulation through the same legislative process being used to consider the current amendment. He further explained that no Council can bind the legislative authority of a future Council, which would retain the ability to modify population thresholds, density limits, or other provisions as it deems appropriate. Councilmember Cotta asked how the state's social equity cannabis licensing program relates to diversity in cannabis retail licensing. City Attorney Drew Pollom explained that, while he could not speak in detail about the program, it is intended to include historically marginalized communities, which may be a significant factor in the issuance of social equity licenses. Councilmember Cotta commented on the relationship and local licensing, expressed support for equal opportunity and clarified that their concerns were specific to the proposed business rather than equal access to licensing opportunities. Mayor Grimm sought clarification on the state's cannabis retail licensing timeline. City Attorney, Drew Pollom confirmed that under the current state framework, no new general cannabis retail licenses are expected to be issued until 2032, with only social equity licenses being available during that period. He explained that this timeline is based on the state's existing cap on cannabis retail licenses and noted that the estimate could change in the future. He also stated that he was not familiar with the methodology used by the state to establish the license cap but could research it further if requested. City Manager, Herold Stewart summarized the Council's discussion and stated that staff understood there was majority support for adding at least one additional social equity cannabis retail license and for considering future licenses based on population growth. He requested clarification on whether the Council wished to authorize one or two additional licenses and what population threshold should be Page 10 of 17 used for future license increases so staff could prepare the appropriate ordinance for the next Council meeting. Councilmember Perales reiterated his support for capping the total number of cannabis retail licenses at six. Councilmember Figueroa expressed support for adding one additional license and tying any future license increases to population growth, while asking whether the Council could require a higher voting threshold to amend the policy in the future. City Attorney Pollom confirmed that the Council could the to amendments future and that higher a impose not standard development regulation would require only a simple majority vote, consistent with applicable law. Councilmember support a using would population that stated Figueroa he increase of 30,000 residents as the threshold for considering an additional cannabis retail license but was open to a higher threshold if preferred by the Council. Mayor Pro Tem Milne reiterated concerns that tying future licenses to population growth would have little practical effect because a future Council could amend the policy at any time. He reflected on previous Council actions regarding cannabis regulations and emphasized that future Council would ultimately have the Councilmember decisions. policy own Figueroa make to authority their responded that establishing the policy would nevertheless communicate the current Council's intent and vision for the community while expressing confidence that future elected officials would thoughtfully consider those discussions. Council discussion indicated support for authorizing one additional cannabis retail license Councilmembers licenses. six to increasing the than rather cap acknowledged that including a population threshold of 30,000 residents would primarily express the current Council's intent, , as a future Council could amend the policy. City Attorney Pollom recommended specifying in the ordinance that the additional license be available only to an applicant holding a Washington State cannabis social equity retail license under RCW 69.50.335. He also noted that the proposed regulatory framework already established the fifth license as a social equity license while maintaining the existing cap on general retail licenses. Legal Parameters for Enforcement of Anti-Camping and Quality of Life Ordinances Deputy City Manager, Richa Sigdel introduced a discussion regarding the legal parameters for enforcing the City's anti-camping and quality of life ordinances, noting that no formal Council action was requested. She explained that recent federal and state court decisions have changed the legal framework governing enforcement. She stated that the City's ordinances are generally compliant with current legal requirements but that staff is reviewing fines, fees, and vehicle impound procedures for consistency with Washington Law. She also noted that ongoing litigation and potential legislative changes could further affect the City's authority. Staff requested Council direction to review and recommend updates to applicable Page 11 of 17 ordinances and fee structures, update police protocols for interactions with homeless individuals, including vehicle impound procedures, and provide policy guidance on issues such as vehicle camping, camping in parks, and encampment cleanups to ensure enforcement aligns with Council's policy objectives and applicable law. Councilmember Cotta expressed support for staff reviewing the City's ordinances to ensure compliance with current law and bringing forward any necessary revisions. He also requested recommendations from the Police Department regarding enforcement practices based on operational experience. As a policy objective, Councilmember Cotta stated a desire to reduce homelessness in a manner that is sustainable for the City's budget, opposed vehicle camping, camping in public parks, public drug use, and unauthorized encampments, and supported developing vehicle impound protocols that discourage vehicle camping while minimizing costs to the City. Councilmember actions, proposed three the support expressed Perales for including reviewing City ordinances for compliance with current law, evaluating fines and impound fees, and updating police protocols for interactions with homeless individuals. He emphasized that enforcement measures should not be unnecessarily punitive toward individuals experiencing homelessness due to financial hardship, while recognizing the need to address unlawful activity when it occurs. Councilmember Perales also requested additional information on police protocols, including how individuals are connected with mental health, housing, and other support services. Councilmember Perales stated opposition to vehicle camping, camping in parks, public drug use, and unauthorized encampments, while expressing appreciation for ongoing efforts to address encampments within the community. Councilmember Campos expressed support for the staff presentation and City recommendations. He supported evaluating ordinances and requested additional information regarding enforcement of vehicle residency regulations, including qualifies vehicle a as a determine whether would officers how homestead, what training and protocols would be used, and whether enforcement would follow a graduated process beginning with outreach and warnings before citations with safety public balancing He impoundment. or emphasized compassion by connecting individuals to available services and advocated for a tiered enforcement approach that prioritizes outreach. He supported prohibiting overnight camping in public parks, particularly near playgrounds and sports fields, and drug referring while use illegal unsafe of enforcement strong favored individuals to diversion programs and community partnerships. He also recommended providing advance notice before encampment cleanups, suggesting a notice period such as 48 or 72 hours. Mayor Pro Tem Milne thanked staff for the presentation and expressed support for strengthening the City's response to homelessness-related issues. He stated that resources and programs are available to help individuals experiencing homelessness who are willing to participate, while noting concerns about Page 12 of 17 substance abuse and individuals who choose not to engage with available services. He shared concerns about the impacts of encampments and vehicle camping on local businesses, public safety, and the City's appearance, including his personal experience with business impacts. He emphasized the importance of balancing compassion with measures that support economic development and public confidence, and supported aligning City regulations to reduce public nuisances. Councilmember Cotta suggested that the task force established by the Police Chief evaluate whether additional cannabis dispensaries could have an impact on homelessness. He stated his belief that homelessness has increased in states that have legalized marijuana. Councilmember Figueroa expressed support for the first recommendation and suggested exploring alternative response models that pair law enforcement responding when professionals health to licensed officers mental with homelessness-related calls. He emphasized the importance of distinguishing between individuals experiencing temporary hardship and repeat offenders, while ensuring those in need receive appropriate services. He requested data on the effectiveness of alternative response programs used by other jurisdictions to help inform future policy and resource He also supported refining allocation. enforcement policies and encouraged exploring creative solutions for impounded vehicles, through could repurposed be vehicles whether including surplus programs that assist individuals with transportation needs. Mayor Grimm asked the Fire Chief to describe the City's existing resource navigator program in response to Councilmember Figueroa's comments about alternative response models. Fire Chief Crowley explained that the City currently operates a resource navigator program consisting of two behavioral health specialist and a resource navigator. He stated that the team receives referrals from emergency responders, law enforcement, and community partners to assist individuals who need services rather than jail or hospitalization. The team helps connect individuals with resources such as shelter, food, and other supportive services. Police Chief Cook stated that the City has been closely monitoring developments in case law related to homelessness and has worked to ensure its practices comply with legal requirements while protecting individuals' rights. He explained that the City has implemented procedures for returning impounded homestead vehicles to their owners when required by the courts and has developed a City- managed solution to address the costs associated with storing such vehicles. He added that staff are compiling information on the City's homelessness-related initiatives and practices into a comprehensive resource for Council review. Mayor Grimm stated that public spaces should remain safe and accessible for all residents while emphasizing that enforcement and compassion can coexist. He expressed support for treating individuals experiencing homelessness with dignity and respect while maintaining public safety and access to parks, sidewalks, and Page 13 of 17 other public spaces. He commended the Police Department's focus on connecting individuals with available resources through programs such as the resource navigator program and the Columbia River Recovery Center. He noted that many community organizations also provide support but emphasized the need for lawful enforcement when necessary. He acknowledged that some individuals experiencing homelessness are facing temporary hardships while others decline available assistance, and stated that both compassion and accountability are important. The Mayor also asked the City Attorney to explain how a pending Washington court decision related to Spokane litigation could affect the City's enforcement authority in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Grants Pass v. Johnson. City Attorney Pollom explained that the City must comply with both the U.S. Constitution and the Washington State Constitution. He noted that while the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Grants Pass v. Johnson establishes the minimum constitutional Constitution Washington the may federal under standard law, federal with conflict not do they long so protections greater provide as constitutional requirements. He explained that states have authority under their police powers to adopt more protective constitutional standards and offered to provide analysis pending how of legal detailed more a with Council the Washington litigation could affect the City's enforcement authority. Councilmember County Franklin the with coordinating recommended Cotta Sheriff's Office when developing homelessness enforcement policies, noting that cooperation would be important for areas where City and County jurisdiction overlap. Mayor Grimm called for public comment Thomas Granbois, Big Maple Properties, shared his perspective as a downtown Pasco property owner, stating that homelessness is a complex issue requiring a balanced approach that combines supportive services with enforcement. He encouraged Council in actively more providers to service local participate discussions and describe the services they provide and the challenges they face. He noted that individuals experiencing homelessness have varying circumstances and needs, and emphasized that housing assistance programs often have eligibility limitations and inconsistent funding availability. He also observed that federal and state funding decisions can significantly affect the resources available to address homelessness at the local level. Mayor Grimm called for additional public comment three (3) times and no one else came forward to speak. Traffic Safety Unit Funding Program Police Chief Brent Cook provided an overview of a proposed traffic safety Page 14 of 17 program funded through automated traffic safety camera revenue. He explained that the program would support existing traffic enforcement efforts rather than create a separate full-time traffic unit. Due to the City’s continued growth, increased roadway demands, and patrol officers’ competing responsibilities, the program would provide additional opportunities for proactive, data-driven traffic safety enforcement. Chief Cook stated that funding would come from red light camera revenue after covering program costs, consistent with state law, City Ordinance No. 4392, and identified transportation safety priorities. The program would focus on targeted enforcement efforts, including speed enforcement, DUI patrols, high-visibility operations, crash reduction strategies, and school safety zones. Performance would be measured through reductions in crashes, injuries, impaired driving, speeding, and other high-risk behaviors. Chief Cook emphasized that the program would complement patrol operations by allowing officers to focus on emergency response and community policing while supporting sustained traffic safety efforts. He noted that the program would include financial oversight, regular reporting, and monitoring to ensure funds are used responsibly and within available resources. Chief Cook reported that the automated traffic safety camera fund currently has approximately $750,000 available. He explained that the fund does not currently support establishing a dedicated traffic unit, but the proposed program would allow the City to evaluate the effectiveness of additional traffic enforcement efforts and determine future needs. Staff recommended approval of using available camera revenue to implement the traffic safety program, with no general fund dollars requested. Councilmember Perales asked about the history and sustainability of the automated traffic safety camera revenue fund, including how long the approximately $750,000 balance had accumulated and the amount of annual revenue generated. Staff explained that the fund was established in 2021 and has accumulated Perales Councilmember time. that the balance current since requested information on the cost of staffing dedicated traffic enforcement officers and whether recurring revenue could support at least one or more positions. He stated that if the revenue source could sustain traffic enforcement staffing, the City should explore that option rather than relying on the General Fund. He also suggested evaluating additional automated traffic cameras, including potential school zone locations under new legislation, as a way to improve safety and potentially generate additional funding. Councilmember Perales acknowledged that could future reduce behaviors increased safer and compliance driving revenue but emphasized the importance of understanding available resources and identifying sustainable funding options as the City continues to grow. Staff reported that from 2021 through 2025, the program generated approximately $166,000 annually in surplus revenue after expenditures, though that surplus trend has been declining in recent years. Mayor Grimm thanked Chief Cook for bringing forward the traffic safety program proposal and expressed support for the initiative. He stated that improving traffic safety has been a priority of his since joining Council, particularly as young drivers in the community begin driving. He shared concerns about dangerous driving behaviors, a including vehicles running red lights, and supported creating dedicated traffic enforcement function focused on proactive efforts such as Page 15 of 17 distracted driving enforcement and other traffic-related violations. The Mayor noted that while a larger traffic unit consisting of a sergeant and multiple officers would be desirable, the current financial resources do not support that level of investment. He expressed support for beginning with a smaller program funded through available revenue and viewed the proposal as a positive step toward improving traffic safety. He also emphasized that increased police visibility and traffic enforcement can have broader public safety benefits by serving as a deterrent to other crimes. The Mayor shared concerns about unsafe driving behaviors he has observed in the community, including minibikes operating in traffic lanes and creating potential hazards, and thanked Chief Cook for pursuing creative solutions to address traffic safety needs. Councilmember Figueroa asked about the risk consideration regarding the program's definition and what steps were being taken to establish measurable outcomes for the proposed traffic safety program. He referenced the importance of tracking results similar to existing DUI and traffic enforcement reporting. Chief Cook explained that the program would include documentation and tracking of enforcement activities performed by assigned personnel. He stated that the City's crime analyst would review available data over time to evaluate trends and determine whether the program is resulting in measurable improvements, such as changes in traffic related violations, crashes, and other safety indicators. Mayor Grimm called for public comment three (3) times and no one came forward. Ordinance - Extending Moratorium on Essential Public Facilities (Secure Community Transition Facilities) Community & Economic Development Deputy Director, Craig Raymond provided an update regarding the City’s ongoing work to develop regulations related to essential He uses. similar facilities, and secure facilities, public transitional explained that a temporary moratorium was established in February to allow time for ordinance development and public outreach. Deputy Director Raymond stated that additional time is needed to incorporate Council direction and ensure the appropriate regulatory process is followed. He noted that the initial six-month moratorium expires on August 17 and recommended extending the moratorium for an additional six months. He advised that a public hearing is required before the extension can be considered and is scheduled for August 3 to review the moratorium renewal ordinance. Mayor Grimm called for public comment three (3 times) and no one came forward. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION City Manager, Harold Stewart reminded Council and the public that the City's National Night Out events will take place on Tuesday, August 4th. He announced two events, one at 2:30pm at Tierra Vida and another at 5:00pm at Gesa Stadium in partnership with He celebrate attend, to residents Devils. local Dust the encouraged law enforcement officers, and learn about community resources available to assist residents. Page 16 of 17 Councilmember Figueroa thanked Council for the evening's discussion and recognized the difficulty of the decisions before them. He shared feedback from residents who appreciate Council's willingness to address challenging issues and commended Councilmembers and staff for their work. Mayor Grimm requested that Council be mindful of staff workload and allow the executive branch flexibility in prioritizing assignments, particularly while staff are managing major other and plan update, process, budget the comprehensive initiatives. He emphasized that Council can establish policy priorities but should allow staff to manage day to day operations and workload priorities. Councilmembers discussed limiting additional requests through the end of the year to allow staff to focus on existing priorities. Councilmember Perales identified animal shelter operations, homelessness, speeding/traffic safety, and Flock cameras as key issues he has been hearing from constituents but agreed to defer additional requests. Councilmember Campos supported the approach, noting that balancing the budget is a major Council priority and staff should have the necessary time and capacity to accomplish goal. that Councilmember Figueroa also supported the idea and suggested using a priority system (such as P1, P2, and P3) when submitting future requests to help staff distinguish urgent matters from items that can be addressed over time. City Attorney Pollom advised that Council’s role is to establish policy direction and priorities, while the City Manager and staff are responsible for implementing those policies and managing daily operations. He emphasized that Council should avoid directing specific administrative tasks or departmental workflows and instead focus on broader goals, including budget priorities. The Mayor reiterated the importance of balancing Council priorities with staff capacity and suggested revisiting the approach after the budget cycle and other major projects are completed. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:54 PM. PASSED and APPROVED on August 17, 2026 ADDITIONAL NOTES Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only) APPROVED: ATTEST: Page 17 of 17