Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2026.08.03 Council Meeting Packet
AGENDA City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, August 3, 2026 Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar Page 1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment) to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this meeting. To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-332-249-0718 and use access code 1338478# City Council meetings are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum at streamed and Richland and Pasco in Cable www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvliveand on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Servicio de intéprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos dias antes para garantizar la disponiblidad. request. upon provided (Spanish may service interpreter language be Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.) 2. CALL TO ORDER 3. ROLL CALL (a) Pledge of Allegiance 4. CONSENT AGENDA - All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate discussion these items. If further discussion is desired by of Councilmembers, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Page 1 of 166 Regular Agenda and considered separately. 5 - 31 (a) Approval of Meeting Minutes for July 13th and July 20th To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes held on July 13, 2026 and the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting Minutes held on July 20, 2026. 32 - 33 (b) Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of $4,848,019.56 $4,848,019.56 of total the amount claims approve To in ($2,395,694.54 in Check Nos. 279471 - 279749; $1,071,606.54 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 853862 - 853870, 853873 - 853878, 853882; $21,570.75 in Check Nos. 55391 - 55429; $1,359,147.73 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30245561 - 30246323). 34 - 46 (c) Resolution No. 4770 Project Acceptance for Schlagel Park Stormwater Main replacement To approve Resolution No. 4770, accepting work performed by Big D's Construction of Tri-Cities under contract for the Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement Project. (RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS - The public may address Council on any items unless it relates to a scheduled Public Hearing. This item is provided to allow the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for debate or for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate response. Some questions require consideration by Council over time and after a deliberative process with input from a number of different sources; some questions are best directed to staff members who have access to specific information. Citizen comments will normally be limited to three minutes each by the Mayor. Those with lengthy messages are invited to summarize for information written submit and/or comments their consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings. Lastly, when called upon, into residency county or city state name your please the and microphone before providing your comments. 7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS (a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers 8. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO Page 2 of 166 47 - 52 (a) Public Hearing and Ordinance No. 4851 - Renewing Moratorium on Community (Secure Transition Public Essential Facilities Facilities) Conduct Public Hearing Motion: "I move to adopt Ordinance 4851, an Ordinance of the City of adopted Pasco, Washington, renewing the moratorium in Ordinance 4817 from August 17, 2026, to February 31, 2027; providing for interpretative authority; providing for corrections; providing for severability; and establishing an effective date." 9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS 53 - 55 (a) *Resolution No. 4771 - Setting a Public Hearing to Consider Lightspeed Networks Inc. Franchise Extension (5 minutes) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4771, setting 7:00 PM, August 17, 2026, as the time and date for a public hearing to consider a Fiber Optic Franchise with Lightspeed Networks, Inc. 56 - 94 (b) and Public a for Date Time - 4772 No. *Resolution Setting Hearing for a Right-of-Way Vacation-Portion of Road 108 ROW Vacation (VAC2026-002) (5 minute staff presentation) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4772, setting 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 8, 2026, as the date and time for a public hearing to consider the vacation of a portion of the Road 108 right-of- way dedicated by AFN 1918957 and AFN 1956207. 95 - 100 (c) Local of Segregation - No. Resolutions 4773 Improvement District No. 152 Assessment (5 minute staff presentation) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4773, relating to Local Improvement District No. 152; providing for the segregation of assessments for certain parcels, referred to as J-14 LLC, consistent with RCW 35.44.410. 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 101 - 116 (a) Cannabis – Affirmative Consent to Compas LLC Social Equity Retail License and Letter of Support MOTION: I move to authorize the City Manager to execute and submit the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board Local Authority Notice indicating the City's affirmative consent for Compas LLC (WSLCB Application No. 445257). 11. NEW BUSINESS Page 3 of 166 117 - 153 (a) Mind the Gap: Navigating Language Barriers in Traffic stops. (15-minute presentation) Presentation by Dr. Hillary Mellinger from Washington State University 12. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION 154 - 164 (a) City Manager Report 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION 14. ADJOURNMENT 15. ADDITIONAL NOTES 165 - 166 (a) Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only) Page 4 of 166 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 21, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Special Meeting: 8/3/26 FROM: Gabriela Sanchez, City Clerk City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Meeting Minutes for July 13th and July 20th I. ATTACHMENT(S): July 13, 2026 Workshop Meeting Minutes July 20, 2026 Regular Meeting Minutes II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes held on July 13, 2026 and the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting Minutes held on July 20, 2026. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 5 of 166 MINUTES City Council Workshop Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, July 13, 2026 Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar MEETING INSTRUCTIONS FOR REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so (website the via City’s online the out filling by form www.pasco- wa.gov/publiccomment) to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this workshop. The Pasco City Council Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum atstreamed and Richland Cable Pasco in and www.pasco- wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco. To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-332-249-0718 and use access code 159 868 676 #. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Servicio de intéprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dias antes para la disponiblidad. (Spanish language dos garantizar interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.) CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Charles Grimm, Mayor. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Abel Campos, Joe Cotta, Mark Figueroa, Calixto Hernandez, Leo Perales, David Milne, Charles Grimm. Councilmembers attending remotely: Councilmembers absent: Staff present: Harold Stewart, City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager; Page 1 of 9Page 6 of 166 Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief; Kevin Hebdon, Finance Director; Drew Pollom, City Attorney; Craig Raymond, Deputy Community & Economic Development Director; Sara Matzen, Human Resources Director; Brent Cook, Police Chief; Maria Serra, Public Works Director; and Gabriela Sanchez, City Clerk. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. Pledge of Allegiance VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmember Campos shared highlights from the weekend, including visits to the Pasco Farmers Market, the Little League state championship game, and The Hub. Congratulations were extended to the Pasco National Intermediate All-Star team for winning regional the to will team advance 3-0. championship state the The tournament in Arizona, and the community was encouraged to support them. Councilmember Cotta reported that the recent Boards and Commissions interviews were successful. Many qualified applicants participated, and recommendations will be presented to the Council for approval. Through the interview process, positions were identified for all applicants who wished to serve, and the Council looks forward to welcoming the new board and commission members. Mayor Grimm reported on the recent Ben Franklin Transit Board meeting, noting that the primary item of interest was the adoption of the agency's six-year Capital Improvement Plan. As part of the plan, the Board chose to prioritize investments in customer than a constructing rather service oriented and facing improvements dedicated training facility. It was noted that employee training will continue through other opportunities. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Presentation - Overview of Broadmoor Master Plan for City Council Staff provided an informational update on the Broadmoor Master Plan, adopted by the City Council in April 2023, outlining progress made since adoption and the anticipated direction of development. The 1,240-acre planning area in northwest Pasco is intended to support coordinated, mixed-use growth through comprehensive planning of residential, commercial, parks, open space, utilities, and transportation infrastructure. Staff reviewed the area's transportation network, land use designations, and development activity. Approximately 24% of the planning area is associated with approved or proposed development, including residential subdivisions, apartment projects, the Pasco Aquatic Center, and the first master site plan application Page 2 of 9Page 7 of 166 submitted under the Broadmoor Master Plan. Staff also discussed potential future updates to the Broadmoor overlay district to improve clarity and administration while preserving the adopted vision. Topics under evaluation include building heights, parking, street trees, mixed-use housing state new with transition zoning, residential standards, compliance legislation, and additional neighborhood-scale open spaces such as pocket parks and plazas. The presentation concluded with an update that approximately 300 acres within the Broadmoor planning area remain unannexed, with an annexation proposal scheduled for Council consideration at a future meeting. No Council action was requested, as the presentation was for informational purposes only. Mayor Pro Tem Milne asked about the status of plans for a large park within the Broadmoor area, noting that earlier concepts were no longer being pursued due to land acquisition costs. Mayor Pro Tem Milne also inquired about ownership of the Columbia River shoreline, the potential for future trails and water taxi access, and whether the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers controlled the property. Staff explained that while the shoreline itself is managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, much of the adjacent developable land is privately owned. Staff noted there have been discussions about relocating the shoreline road to create additional future would that planning and opportunities development stated require collaboration with private property owners. The councilmember expressed support for preserving opportunities for public amenities, including trails and river access, as the Broadmoor area develops. Councilmember Perales discussed the long-term vision for the Broadmoor strong a maintaining importance of emphasized and area planning the commercial and mixed-use focus to create a regional shopping, entertainment, and employment destination rather than a primarily residential community. Staff clarified that the potential zoning discussions are intended to improve the clarity and administration of the Broadmoor overlay district by refining development standards, such as requirements for sidewalks, bicycle facilities, street trees, and residential transition zoning, without changing the overall vision of the master plan. Councilmember Perales also encouraged staff to consider incorporating traffic- calming measures into future street designs and reiterated the importance of providing parks and community gathering spaces to establish a unique identity for the area. Discussion included the possibility of larger community parks in addition to neighborhood pocket parks, with staff noting that developers currently often choose to pay park impact fees instead of constructing park facilities. Additional comments highlighted the opportunity for Broadmoor to become a premier Staff Tri-Cities. the for commercial entertainment and was district encouraged to evaluate development standards, including building heights, to Page 3 of 9Page 8 of 166 support a vibrant, high-quality urban center while preserving the long-term vision established in the Broadmoor Master Plan. No action was taken following the discussion. Mayor Grimm called for public comment. Elaine Heatherton, Pasco resident asked whether plans for the Broadmoor area include a future bridge across the Columbia River to improve access and support long-term growth. In response, a councilmember explained that a fourth Columbia River crossing is a regional and federal transportation issue rather than a City of Pasco project. The councilmember noted that planning and funding for a new bridge would require coordination among regional, state, and federal agencies and would involve significant costs. It was also noted that regional discussions have included the potential for a northern river crossing to improve freight movement and reduce truck continue City the encouraged to Tri-Cities. the through traffic Elaine considering future bridge access as part of its long-range planning. Mayor Grimm called for public comments three (3) times and no one else came forward to speak. Council Update – Electric-Assisted Bicycle Laws and Existing City Code The Deputy City Manager provided an informational update on electric-assisted bicycles (e-bikes) in response to questions regarding enforcement following actions taken by a neighboring jurisdiction. Staff reported that, after reviewing state law and the City's municipal code, no code amendments are recommended at this time. Staff explained that recent changes to Washington law classify motorized bicycles capable of traveling more than 20 miles per hour on motor power alone as motor vehicles rather than e-bikes, making them subject to licensing, registration, and other motor vehicle requirements. Staff also noted that the City's municipal code already incorporates the applicable state statutes, including provisions related to failure to supervise a minor when appropriate. municipal adequate provide code and that state existing advised Staff law enforcement authority. The Police Department and City Prosecutor's Office will continue to coordinate enforcement and monitor implementation, with staff returning to the Council if future code changes become necessary. Councilmembers discussed potential enhancements to the City's approach to e- bike regulation, education, and enforcement. Suggestions included creating a dedicated municipal code chapter addressing the various classes of electric bicycles and other motorized bikes, increasing public education regarding recent Page 4 of 9Page 9 of 166 changes to state law, considering a helmet requirement for riders under 18, evaluating restrictions on modified e-bikes that exceed state limits, and exploring nighttime safety equipment requirements. Additional suggestions included a progressive enforcement approach for repeat violations. Councilmembers e-bike enforces Department Police asked how also the regulations, particularly in parks and along recreational trails. The Police Chief explained that motorized vehicles are not permitted on the river trail system and that enforcement depends on available staffing. The Police Department is working with Parks staff to improve reporting of violations and is evaluating additional signage noted enforcement that It was trail communicate better to rules. resources are limited, but safety concerns will continue to be addressed as staffing allows. Additional discussion focused on community education regarding the recent changes to state law. Staff reported that the City will continue public outreach through social media, informational materials, and collaboration with the Pasco School District to educate students and families about e-bike classifications and safe operation. Councilmembers emphasized that addressing e-bike safety will require a combination of education, clear signage, and targeted enforcement, particularly in Chiawana Park and Wade Park where concerns have increased. Mayor Grimm called for public comment. Ms. Wade asked whether the City could implement a warning or progressive enforcement system for minors who violate e-bike regulations, such as issuing warnings before more significant consequences. Ms. Wade emphasized the importance of educating young riders while also ensuring there are meaningful consequences for repeated violations. She encouraged the public to continue reporting unsafe behavior to the Police Department so enforcement efforts can be directed where problems are occurring and expressed the view that consistent enforcement and accountability are necessary to improve compliance and public safety Councilmembers emphasized the importance of taking a proactive approach to e- bike safety through education and enforcement. Discussion focused on increasing contacts with young riders to provide education, encouraging enforcement of existing laws, and exploring additional measures such as a helmet requirement for riders under 18. Councilmembers expressed concern that the City should demonstrate meaningful action to improve safety and reduce future incidents and requested that staff continue evaluating potential policy recommendations for future Council discussion. a requires safety improving e-bike stressed also Councilmembers that collaborative effort involving the City, law enforcement, parents, schools, elected officials, within and the community. Members encouraged public education neighborhoods and schools, supported additional outreach regarding helmet use and safe riding practices, and generally expressed support for staff evaluating a Page 5 of 9Page 10 of 166 helmet requirement for minors. The Council reached a general consensus directing staff to continue public education efforts, evaluate a helmet requirement for riders under 18, and consider additional safety measures for future Council review. Resolution - Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Detour Agreement Engineering Manager presented on a proposed detour agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for the US395/Court Street roundabout improvement project. The project includes construction of a roundabout, sidewalks, and other intersection improvements. During the first phase of construction, temporary traffic control and a detour utilizing designated city streets will be required to maintain traffic flow. Staff explained that WSDOT and City staff jointly documented the existing condition of the affected roadways. Under the agreement, WSDOT will restore any roadway or stripping impacts resulting from the detour to their pre- construction condition. The detour is expected to be in place for approximately three weeks during the 2026 construction season. Mayor Grimm called for public comments three (3) times and no one came forward to speak. Resolution - Washington State University and the City of Pasco for the Use of Body-Worn Camera Footage for Research Purposes Chief Cook represented on a resolution authorizing a data sharing agreement between the City of Pasco Police Department and Washington State University (WSU). The agreement allows the police department to share data, including CAD and camera data, with WSU researchers for approved research projects aimed at evaluating police operations and identifying opportunities for improvement. Chief noted that since 2022, WSU has completed four research projects involving the Pasco Police Department, including studies on procedural justice, language barriers during traffic stops, new officer preparedness, and officer stress during calls for service. The agreement has no financial impact and supports continued collaboration with WSU to improve policing practices through research. Staff also advised that findings from the language barrier traffic stop study are expected to be presented to Council in August. Councilmember Perales asked about safeguards to prevent police video footage from being misused or presented in a way that could negatively portray the city. Chief Cook responded that all data shared with researchers is tracked and auditable, allowing the city to monitor what information is accessed and identify the source of any misuse. Chief Cook added that the university researchers and students have been respectful in their use of the data, noting that some students Page 6 of 9Page 11 of 166 reported gaining a more positive understanding of law enforcement through their research. Councilmember Figueroa commended the Pasco Police Department for its ongoing collaboration with higher education institutions and its willingness to participate in research aimed at improving policing practices. Councilmember Figueroa noted that inviting outside review and implementing recommendations demonstrates the department's commitment to continuous improvement and evidence-based policing. Mayor Grimm called for public comment. Ms. Wade expressed concerns about the sharing of police body-worn camera footage and other data with researchers. She described personal experiences involving privacy and safety concerns, including fears that sensitive footage could be contacting from individuals discourage law others by accessed and enforcement. She questioned the need to provide researchers with direct access to police data and suggested that research requests instead be handled through the public records process. She urged Council to consider the potential privacy and public trust implications of the agreement. Mayor Grimm called for public comment, and no one else came forward. Ordinance - R-15 and R-S-12 Frontage Improvement Code Amendments Community & Economic Development Deputy Director presented a proposed code amendments related to exemptions from certain residential infrastructure improvement requirements in the R-15 and RS-12 zoning districts. He explained that the proposal reflects previous Council direction and includes draft ordinance language including potential outlined benefits, The review. for presentation reduced initial development costs and preservation of existing neighborhood character, as well as concerns related to future infrastructure costs, consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Complete Streets Policy, traffic and pedestrian safety, and the need to preserve right-of-way for future improvements. During discussion, Councilmember Perales questioned the proposed 10-year latecomer agreement (LID) period and suggested reducing it to five years. Staff responded that the timeframe may be established by state law and agreed to research whether modifications are permissible. Councilmember Perales also emphasized the importance of preserving adequate right-of-way for future utility infrastructure semi-rural while balancing the City's goal of maintaining the character of existing neighborhoods and accommodating future growth. Mayor Grimm called for public comment. Christine Batayola spoke in support of the proposed code amendments to allow exemptions from certain frontage improvement requirements in lower density Page 7 of 9Page 12 of 166 residential areas. She stated that requiring curb, gutter, sidewalks, and street lighting significantly increases development costs in areas with lower housing density, making projects less financially feasible. She suggested limiting the exemption by continuing to require full frontage improvements along collector and arterial roads whole allowing flexibility on local streets. She also noted that right- of-way dedication could still be preserved regardless of whether full frontage improvements are required. Mayor Grimm called for public comment two (2) times and no one else came forward. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION City Manager, Herald Stewart announced the appointment of Chief Cook as the City of Pasco's Police Chief following a comprehensive selection process. He expressed confidence in Chief Cook's leadership, commitment to developing officers, and ability to serve both the Police Department and the community as a member of the city's leadership team. Harold also announced that the next Coffee with a Cop event would be held from 2:00 pm to 4:00 pm at Roasters Coffee on Marie Street and noted that a formal swearing-in ceremony for Chief Cook would be scheduled at a later date to allow family and friends to attend. Councilmember Perales requested that staff explore the creation of a formal hardship or accessibility accommodation process for residential ramps that are subject to potential code enforcement actions. He explained that some residents, particularly seniors and individuals with mobility limitations, may face significant challenges accessing their homes and requested a case by case review for legitimate hardship rather than a blanket code change. Councilmembers discussed the possibility of establishing limited, non-precedent- setting accommodations that could be reviewed individually by staff. Staff noted potential concerns regarding long-term applicability, including whether exemptions would transfer to future property owners who may not have the same accessibility needs, and suggested that any process include periodic reevaluation. Other Councilmembers expressed support for finding a balanced approach that provides assistance to residents with legitimate needs while maintaining consistent standards. Staff agreed to explore options if directed by Council. Councilmember Perales requested staff return with additional information regarding potential data center development within the City of Pasco and consider a temporary moratorium while the impacts and potential regulations are studied. He noted that recent community feedback reflected significant public concern regarding data centers but acknowledged that they may also provide economic development opportunities. Councilmembers discussed the need to better understand potential impacts related to energy use, water resources, environmental considerations, noise, and community impacts before establishing regulations. Several Councilmembers expressed support Page 8 of 9Page 13 of 166 for a workshop or study session and exploring a moratorium to allow time for research and development of appropriate standards and safeguards. Councilmembers noted the importance of balancing the benefits of technology and economic growth with infrastructure capacity and quality-of-life considerations. Mayor Grimm recognized and thanked City Manager, Harold Stewart for his leadership, thoughtful contributions, and commitment to serving the city. He highlighted the City Manager's role in recent decisions, including the Police Chief selection process, and expressed appreciation for his efforts to support Council and the community. EXECUTIVE SESSION (a) To consider site selection or acquisition of real estate purchase or lease if likelihood that disclosure would increase price per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) (b) Discussion with legal counsel about current or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) ADJOURNMENT Council adjourned into Executive Session at 8:26 PM for 15 minutes returning at 8:41 PM to discuss with legal about current or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) and to consider site selection or acquisition of real estate purchase or lease if likelihood that disclosure would increase price per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) with the City Manager, Deputy City Manager, and City Attorney. Mayor Grimm called the meeting back to order at 8:41 PM. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:41 PM. PASSED and APPROVED on _______________________. CLOSED SESSION Collective Bargaining Discussion APPROVED: ATTEST: Page 9 of 9Page 14 of 166 MINUTES City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, July 20, 2026 Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar MEETING INSTRUCTIONS FOR REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so (City’s the via website online the out filling by form www.pasco- wa.gov/publiccomment) to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this meeting. To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-332-249-0718 and use access code 114373633# City Council meetings are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on streamed at and and Pasco in Charter/Spectrum Cable Richland www.pasco- wa.gov/psctvliveand on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Servicio de intéprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal antes para dos la disponiblidad. (Spanish language dias garantizar interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.) CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by David Milne, Mayor Pro Tem. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Abel Campos, Joe Cotta, Mark Figueroa, Calixto Hernandez, Leo Perales; and David Milne Councilmembers attending remotely: Councilmembers absent: Charles Grimm Staff present: Harold Stewart, City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager; Page 1 of 17Page 15 of 166 Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief; Kevin Hebdon, Finance Director; Drew Pollom, City Attorney; Craig Raymond, Deputy Community & Economic Development Director; Brent Cook, Police Chief; Maria Serra, Public Works Director; and Gabriela Sanchez, City Clerk The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. Pledge of Allegiance Troop 100 of Scouts of America lead the Pledge of Allegiance and presented the colors. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Meeting Minutes for July 6th MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember Campos To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting held on July 6, 2026, Regular Meeting. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of $8,281,420.02 MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember $8,281,420.02 of amount total the claims approve To Campos in ($3,146,521.03 in Check Nos. 279052 - 279470; $3,799,122.30 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 853586 - 853587, 853597 - 853860; $13,487.80 in Check Nos. 55352 Transfer - 30244815 Nos. Electronic in $1,322,288.89 55390; - 30245560). RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm Resolution No. 4764 - Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Detour Agreement Page 2 of 17Page 16 of 166 MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember Campos To approve Resolution No. 4764, authorizing the City Manager to execute State with Agreement Washington Haul Agency Road/Detour Department of Transportation for their US 395 Kartchner St I/C NB Ramp Terminal Improvements project. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm Planning Commission Appointment MOTION: by Councilmember Perales moved, seconded Councilmember Campos To appoint Sonny Virakpanyou to Position No. 1 (term expiration date 12/31/2027) to the Planning Commission. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm LEOFF Disability Board Appointment MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember Campos To appoint Jodi Christiansen to Position No. 3 (term expiration date 07/15/2028) to the LEOFF Disability Board. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm Pasco Public Facilities District Board Reappointment and Appointment MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember Campos To reappoint Marie Gillespie to Position No. 4 and appoint Craig Maloney to Position No. 5 to the Pasco Public Facilities District Board with both terms expiring on 07/15/2030. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 Page 3 of 17Page 17 of 166 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS Mariana Marquez, Scoutmaster for Troop 100 of Scouts of America introduced the troop and explained that its members range in age from 11 to 19. She noted that attendance at a City Council meeting fulfills a requirement for the Citizenship in the Community Merit Badge, allowing Scouts to learn about the role of local government. She thanked the Council for the opportunity to observe local government in action and stated that several Scouts would share their thoughts and ideas. retiree regarding the addressed Council Pasco a Andres, Michelle resident, healthcare benefits for LEOFF 1 members, urging the City to honor its longstanding commitment to cover eligible medical expenses not paid by Medicare. She also expressed concerns about speed humps on Court Street, stating they could delay emergency transport. response and negatively impact injured patients during Additionally, she raised concerns regarding responsiveness from City departments, animal control and code enforcement issues in her neighborhood, water runoff affecting a nearby property, and potential unpermitted sewer work. She encouraged the Council to address these issues and uphold its commitments to public servants and the community. Andrea Domingos, a Pasco resident and member of Troop 100, spoke about the importance of after-school activities for students. She acknowledged the Pasco School District's investment in education and noted that budget constraints affecting after-school programs are not the fault of either the school district or the City of Pasco. She highlighted the valuable role of Parks and Recreation in providing safe, free, and low-cost activities for youth but expressed concern that some families are unable to access these programs due to transportation and other barriers. She encouraged the City to support efforts to expand the accessibility of these organizations and programs for students throughout Pasco. Camila Martinez, a Pasco resident and member of Troop 100 spoke about the importance of maintaining grass, weeds, and vacant fields to reduce fire risks during the summer. She encouraged the City and County to consistently enforce property maintenance standards and suggested regular inspections of larger properties to ensure dry grass, weeds, and other fire hazards are addressed. She stated that property owners who fail to correct identified issues after notification should be subject to fines, emphasizing that the goal is prevention rather than punishment. She concluded by urging stronger enforcement of existing property maintenance regulations to help protect the community from preventable fires. Page 4 of 17Page 18 of 166 Mitch Snow, a Pasco resident, thanked the Mayor and Detective Taylor for meeting with him regarding his concerns. He alleged that his home had been broken into multiple times and stated that he had evidence identifying those responsible, but expressed frustration that no enforcement action had been taken. He also raised concerns about the handling of his previous arrest, alleging unequal treatment and a lack of accountability. He urged the City and Police Department to improve their response to his concerns and stated he would be providing additional information related to the matter. Natalie Williams, a Pasco resident, spoke in support of the proposed data center moratorium. She expressed appreciation that the proposed ordinance included various types of computing facilities, including cryptocurrency operations. She voiced concerns about the potential impacts of data centers on wastewater treatment, drinking water quality, agricultural resources, and electrical capacity. She encouraged the Council to carefully consider these issues to help ensure the protection of essential public resources before approving large-scale data center development. Dennis Brown, a Pasco resident, spoke about his experience working in the crane industry and emphasized the value of collaboration and problem-solving. He encouraged the City to work more cooperatively with residents when addressing concerns rather than relying on enforcement measures. He reiterated his request for curb ramps to improve access to his property and described damage to his vehicle that he attributed to existing curb conditions. He also expressed concern about the tone of a code enforcement notice received by a neighbor and encouraged the City to prioritize communication and collaboration with residents before pursuing penalties. Jason Mallaloy, General Manager of the Pasco Resource Recovery Center, thanked Council Members and staff who toured the facility and invited those who were unable to attend to visit in the future. He provided a quarterly operational update, reporting that the facility finished the second quarter approximately $275,000 under budget and was about $500,000 under budget year-to-date due to operational efficiencies. He discussed ongoing efforts to maximize renewable natural gas production, reduce treatment costs, and evaluate nitrogen removal solutions. He stated that performance testing of the City's proposed nitrogen removal system is expected to be completed during the third quarter and that Burnham will fund the initial engineering phase of an alternative solution to assist the City in determining the most effective long-term approach. Elaine Heatherington, Pasco resident, encourages all eligible Pasco residents to participate in the upcoming election. She reminded voters to review candidates and ballot measures using nonpartisan resources, carefully complete and sign their ballots, and return them on time. She highlighted the availability of secure ballot drop boxes throughout Franklin County and encouraged residents to remind family, friends, neighbors, and coworkers to vote. Heatherington emphasized that increased voter participation reflects an informed and engaged community and encouraged Pasco residents to demonstrate strong civic engagement through the election process. Page 5 of 17Page 19 of 166 Amber Waid shared a personal reflection on civic engagement and public participation, expressing concern that residents feel discouraged from attending and speaking at City Council meetings when they do no see meaningful action or outcomes. Through a poem and personal remarks, she described the importance of listening to community voices, referenced past public discussions, including fluoride, and contrasted public participation in neighboring communities. Waid also spoke about her own challenges with public speaking due to health changes, asking that pauses or difficulty finding words not be mistaken for a lack of commitment. She concluded community value and recognize to Council the encouraging by participation, warning that continued disappointment mad lead to fewer residents engaging in the public process. Mayor Pro Tem Milne called for public comment, no one else came forward to speak. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS Verbal Reports from Councilmembers Councilmember Cotta reported touring the City's Process Water Reuse Facility, where staff provided an overview of the facility's operations and ongoing efforts to improve nitrogen removal from the treatment process. He also attended a Tri- Cities Chamber hosted data center meeting, noting that the discussion provided useful foundational information from industry panelists, while acknowledging that questions about data center development remain to be addressed. Councilmember Figueroa reported touring the City's Process Water Reuse Facility, where he learned about the treatment process and the collaborative partnership supporting the project. He expressed appreciation for the progress being made and looked forward to the facility operating at full effectiveness and efficiency. He also attended the Regional Advocacy Roundtable on data centers, where discussion focused on the potential economic benefits and other impacts of data center development. He stated he looked forward to the upcoming Council discussion on the topic. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO Public Meeting & Resolution No. 4765 - Accepting a Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Goodwin 10% Annexation Petition (ANX 2026-002) Deputy Director Craig Raymond presented a resolution regarding a notice of intent to commence annexation proceedings for approximately 6 acres located within the Broadmoor Master Plan area between Harris Road and Highway 182. He outlined the statutory annexation process, including petition requirements, Page 6 of 17Page 20 of 166 review by the Franklin County Assessor, public hearings, and City Council consideration of annexation and zoning ordinances. Raymond explained that the proposal was submitted by the sole property owners, satisfying the petition requirements, the to resolution the accept approval recommended and of annexation petition as submitted, proceed with the public hearing and zoning review process, and require the property to assume its proportionate share of existing City indebtedness upon annexation. Mayor Pro Tem Milne opened the public meeting. He called for public comment three (3) times and no on came forward. Public meeting was closed. MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember Campos MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4765, accepting the Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation proceedings for the Goodwin Annexation for Parcel No. 118180157 (Parcel 1 of AFN 456145), located south of Harris Road and north of Interstate 182, southwest of the future Road 108 and Harris Road intersection, in Section 18, Township 9 North, Range 29 E.W.M., establishing the proposed annexation boundary and determining whether simultaneous zoning and the assumption of bonded indebtedness will be required. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm Public Hearing and Ordinance No. 4848 - R-15 and R-S-12 Frontage Improvement Code Amendments Deputy Director Craig Raymond provided an overview of the proposed residential street improvement exemptions for properties within the R15 and RS12 zoning areas. He noted that the former RS20 zoning designation is now referred to as R15 following adoption of Ordinance No. 4828. Raymond explained that the proposed exemptions were previously considered under similar regulations that were rescinded in 2019. Raymond reviewed the areas impacted by the proposal and discussed potential benefits, including reduced redevelopment costs, less immediate financial burden on property owners, and preservation of existing neighborhood character. He also outlined concerns, including potential conflicts with the City’s Complete Streets policy, adopted through Ordinance No. 4389, and the challenges of ensuring adequate pedestrian, bicycle, and roadway infrastructure as residential density increases. He noted that future growth allowed under House Bill 1110 could significantly Page 7 of 17Page 21 of 166 increase residential density, potentially creating additional transportation and safety challenges if infrastructure improvements are not addressed during development. Raymond explained that while exemptions may reduce upfront costs, they could make future infrastructure improvements more difficult and costly. He also highlighted that some developments may not trigger traffic impact analyses due to current thresholds, potentially creating gaps in transportation planning. Mayor Pro Tem opened the public hearing and called for public comment. Michelle Andres expressed concerns regarding increased density and redevelopment impacts in existing neighborhoods. She stated that some areas may be overbuilt and referenced changes to Sylvester Street, noting concerns about traffic flow, emergency vehicle access, and the impact of development on surrounding areas. Andre also raised concerns about increased density along Road 76 near Court Street and the financial impacts placed on taxpayers. She emphasized the importance of balancing growth with maintaining neighborhood character, development, increased and infrastructure ensuring supports considering the broader community impacts of planning decisions. She also shared concerns that changes to roadways and neighborhood design can affect community events and accessibility. Mayor Pro Tem called for public comment three (3) times and no on else came forward to speak. Public hearing was closed. Mayor Pro Tem clarified that the intent of the proposed ordinance is to help manage noted He areas. certain residential density increased limit and in concerns from residents, particularly in the Riverview area, regarding the potential replacement of single family homes with significantly higher density developments. He stated that the goal is to preserve the character and feel of existing neighborhoods while balancing state requirements, and explained that Ordinance No. 4848 is intended to address these concerns. Councilmember Perales expressed support for the proposed ordinance, noting that concerns regarding increased density have been discussed for some time. He thanked staff for presenting the potential benefits and challenges of the proposal and stated that the ordinance provides a balance between policy goals and preserving neighborhood character. He also emphasized the importance of local decision-making and the City's home rule authority when addressing state- driven density requirements. He noted that some areas, particularly the Riverview area, have a rural or suburban character that residents value and expressed concern about developments that may significantly alter the existing community feel. He stated that the proposed policy could provide relief for developers while helping maintain neighborhood character and supported moving forward with the ordinance, while recognizing future Councils could revisit the policy if needed. Councilmember Figueroa expressed concerns regarding consistency with previously adopted city policies, including the complete streets policy, Page 8 of 17Page 22 of 166 comprehensive plan, and multimodal transportation goals. He noted that while the proposed neighborhoods, specific in the address may ordinance concerns affected area appears broader than initially anticipated and could have significant long-term implications for the city. Councilmember Figueroa emphasized the importance of considering how current decisions align with adopted plans and how they will impact future Councils and residents. He questioned whether the city should be making exceptions that could conflict with existing transportation and connectivity goals and encouraged further discussion about the desired neighborhood character throughout Pasco. He stated that policy decisions should be made with a long-term perspective and a focus on leaving the city in a stronger position for future generations. Mayor Pro Tem commented on the importance of collaboration and listening to the concerns of fellow Councilmembers and the residents they represent. Mayor Pro Tem noted that previous Council have faced similar discussions regarding balancing differing perspectives and district specific concerns. He emphasized that the current Council works together to consider constituent feedback and make decisions that support both individual neighborhoods and the city as a whole. Mayor Pro Tem stated that while challenges and differing opinions will arise, the Council remains focused on preserving the character of communities and acting in the best interest of Pasco residents. MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember Cotta MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4848, amending Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Title 12.04 required sidewalk and driveway improvements; Title 12.36 concurrency; and Title 21.15 complete streets policy; and providing for severability and establishing an effective date. RESULT: Motion carried 5-1 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos NAYS: Councilmember Figueroa ABSENT: Mayor Grimm ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS Ordinance No. 4849 - Creating Chapter 3.31 of the Pasco Municipal Code – Local Income Tax City Manager stated that at the previous regular City Council meeting, Council directed staff to bring the ordinance forward for consideration. He noted that the ordinance presented for consideration had not been modified by staff since it was previously discussed and researched. Councilmember Perales expressed appreciation for bringing the topic forward and noted that the discussion is timely. He referenced a statewide initiative related to Page 9 of 17Page 23 of 166 the repeal of the capital gains tax, which will appear on the November ballot, and acknowledged that there are differing perspectives regarding income taxes at the state and local levels. Councilmember Perales stated that the proposed ordinance would establish a process requiring public input, discussion at open Council meetings, and consideration by future Councils before implementing a local income tax. He emphasized the importance of allowing residents to have a voice in such decisions and thanked staff for their work in developing and bringing forward the ordinance. MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember Cotta MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4849 creating a new Chapter 3.31 of the Pasco Municipal Code entitled "Local Income Tax," within title 3 "Revenue and Finance" of the Pasco Municipal Code, to oppose a local income tax on the residents and businesses of the City of Pasco providing for severability and establishing an effective date. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm Ordinance No. 4850 - Imposing a Six-Month Moratorium on Licenses and Permits related to New Data Centers, Cryptocurrency Mining Facilities, Blockchain Computing Facilities and Artificial Intelligence Computing Facilities on Deputy Director Craig Raymond provided an overview of the proposed six-month moratorium on the acceptance and processing of licenses and permits for new data center facilities within the City of Pasco. He explained that data centers are rapidly expanding nationwide, including throughout Washington State and the Tri- Cities region, driven by increasing demand for infrastructure and capacity. Raymond noted that data centers are currently permitted by right within the City’s I-2 and I-3 zoning districts, subject to existing development standards, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, landscaping, parking requirements, and utility concurrency requirements to ensure adequate infrastructure capacity. Councilmember Perales asked staff to clarify the difference between an interim emergency ordinance and a formal moratorium. He expressed a preference for exploring potential develop to staff allow that approach interim an would immediately regulations while gathering additional information, rather than adopting a full moratorium. Councilmember Perales stated that data centers present both potential benefits and concerns, including economic development opportunities, They costs. utility on and impacts, environmental effects emphasized the importance of obtaining accurate information and addressing misinformation surrounding data center development. He suggested staff engage with nearby communities, including those in the Umatilla County area where data centers have been developed, to learn from their experiences and identify potential that if noted future Councilmember strategies. mitigation Perales Page 10 of 17Page 24 of 166 information demonstrates significant negative impacts, additional restrictions could be considered; however, if appropriate safeguards and regulations can address community concerns, the city may be able to establish a framework that allows responsible data center development. He recommended pursuing an interim emergency ordinance approach to allow further study and development of regulations. Councilmember center data Chamber Tri-City reported attending Cotta the meeting and noted that the discussion provided additional information regarding data center operations, including power and water usage. He stated that data centers vary significantly in size and that resource impacts may depend on the specific facility and available infrastructure. He expressed that questions remain regarding wastewater impacts, usage, availability, power long-term water regulatory constraints, and potential environmental and health concerns. He referenced the Microsoft data center in Quincy as an example of an established facility with reported resource impacts but noted that newer facilities may present different information challenges. He stated that additional and analysis are needed before moving forward with significant data center development and expressed the allow to city to better or moratorium a for support pause and regulations, appropriate ensure impacts, potential understand establish infrastructure can support future facilities. He emphasized that the goal is not to prohibit all data centers, but to evaluate factors such as facility size, resource demands, developer partnerships, and community impacts before approving new development. Councilmember Figueroa stated that the Tri-City Chamber data center roundtable and additional conversations with elected officials provided valuable information. He emphasized that data centers are not all the same and distinguished between smaller enterprise facilities and large hyperscale data centers associated with major technology companies and artificial intelligence operations. Councilmember Figueroa noted that smaller data centers generally have lower power demands, while He resources. greater significantly can facilities hyperscale require discussed potential concerns related to energy consumption, water availability, backup need better to the diesel impacts, environmental generators, and understand infrastructure capacity before approving large-scale developments. He expressed support for a proactive approach that establishes appropriate regulations and safeguards rather than waiting until development proposals are submitted. Councilmember Figueroa recommended further research and discussion regarding available power and water capacity, potential impacts, and appropriate standards to protect residents, resources, and the environment. He stated that the goal should not necessarily be to prohibit data centers, but to establish reasonable parameters and guardrails, particularly for larger facilities. Councilmember Campos stated that data center development is an important and timely topic and clarified that there are currently no known data projects proposed, planned or under permit review within the City of Pasco. He explained that the purpose of the discussion is to be proactive and ensure the city has appropriate regulations in place should a future proposal be submitted. Councilmember Campos acknowledged that there is significant public interest and differing Page 11 of 17Page 25 of 166 opinions regarding data centers and stated that additional information and community input are needed before making long-term decisions. He expressed support for a six-month moratorium to allow time for research, review of potential impacts, and development of appropriate policies. He emphasized the importance of conducting due diligence and providing residents an opportunity to participate in the discussion before any future data center proposals are considered. Councilmember six-month the for proposed expressed Hernandez support moratorium. He stated that the pause would allow the city to be prepared should a future data center proposal be submitted and ensure that Council has sufficient information available to make an informed decision regarding whether and how to proceed. Mayor Pro Tem thanked Councilmembers for their comments and emphasized the center data future potential for proactively of importance planning development. He noted that the purpose of the proposed moratorium is to allow the potential establish and impacts, evaluate develop a plan, to time city appropriate guidelines should a data center proposal be submitted in the future. He expressed appreciation for staff's work in bringing the item forward. MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember Figueroa MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4850, an ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, imposing a six-month moratorium on the acceptance and processing permit development and/or applications business of licenses blockchain facilities, mining centers, cryptocurrency new to related data computing facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and other high- density computing facilities; setting forth preliminary findings in support of this moratorium; declaring an emergency; establishing an immediate effective date; authorizing publication by summary only; and directing staff to develop and return to City Council with recommended land use regulations addressing the permitting and licensing of these facilities within six months of adoption of the moratorium. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm Resolution No. 4766 - Washington State University and the City of Pasco for the Use of Body-Worn Camera Footage for Research Purposes. Mayor Pro Tem called for a five (5) minute recess at 8:11 PM due to AC issues. Police Chief Cook presented Resolution No. 4766, which authorizes agreement Page 12 of 17Page 26 of 166 with Washington State University to share body-worn camera data and other relevant law enforcement data, including Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) information. He explained that the data will be used by researchers to evaluate police performance and related practices. Chief Cook noted that the city has maintained since University State Washington with agreement similar a approximately 2022 and that the current action updates the agreement and ensures the appropriate signatures and approvals are in place. Councilmember Figueroa requested clarification for the public record regarding privacy and confidentiality concerns related to the sharing of body-worn camera footage and other data with Washington State University. He noted that similar concerns had been raised during a previous workshop and asked whether any issues had occurred under the existing collaboration. Police Chief Cook explained that the data-sharing agreement includes provisions addressing privacy and confidentiality requirements. He stated that the city has not experienced any issues with WSU researchers accessing body-worn camera footage. He noted that the research involves technical analysis, including coding for specific behaviors, phrases, and other data points, rather than general review of footage. Chief Cook expressed confidence in the safeguards outlined in the agreement and stated that any concerns would be addressed appropriately if they arose. MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember Cotta Motion: I move to approve Resolution No. 4766, authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement between the City of Pasco and Washington State University for the use of Pasco Police Department body-worn camera footage for approved academic research purposes. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm Resolution No. 4767 - Approval for Application to Public Works Board for Pre- Construction Funding for Butterfield WTP Land Acquisition Public Works Director, Maria Serra presented a resolution authorizing staff to submit an application for funding assistance to support the acquisition of property for the future construction of the new Butterfield Water Treatment Facility. The proposed facility would replace the city’s aging water treatment plant. Serra explained that the City is seeking $1 million in funding, which is the maximum award available for pre-construction activities during the current biennium. She noted that the Public Works Board funding is provided as a low-interest loan, with the potential for a portion of the principal to be forgiven, effectively functioning as Page 13 of 17Page 27 of 166 grant a is resolution the of required that stated She assistance. adoption component of the funding application and highlighted that the Public Works Board provides low-interest financing, with current rates below one percent. Councilmember Campos expressed support for the resolution, stating that the funding opportunity was a significant benefit for the city. He highlighted the favorable low-interest rate, approximately 0.93%, and the potential for up to 50% of the award to be provided as grant funding through principal forgiveness. He stated that pursuing the funding opportunity was a clear benefit for the city and commended staff for their efforts. MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember Cotta MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.4767, authorizing the submittal of a Public Works Board Pre-Construction Loan Application for the Butterfield WTP Land Acquisition. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm Resolution No. 4768 – Right-of-Way Dedication and Reimbursement Agreement Deputy City Manager Richa Sigdel presented an item requesting authorization for the reimbursement and dedication right-of-way Manager execute to City a agreement with Big Sky Developers for additional right-of-way along Convention Drive. She explained that the issue has been under discussion for several years due to challenges with the alignment of Burns Road and Convention Drive, including the presence of high-voltage transmission lines along existing property boundaries. Sigdel stated that multiple alignment options were evaluated, but each presented significant costs and risks. A city-led realignment was estimated at approximately $2 million, with additional costs associated with relocating power infrastructure. She noted that moving individual transmission poles could cost between $50,000 and $80,000 each. To address the issue, staff proposed a partnership approach in which the city would acquire additional right-of-way to create a properly aligned intersection, while the developer would be responsible for design, permitting, construction, and building the roadway to City standards. The agreement would require the city to purchase the additional right-of-way at $8.85 per square foot, for an estimated cost of approximately $516,000, with $500,000 already included in the city’s biennial budget. Sigdel emphasized the importance of improving Convention Drive as a key parallel route to Road 68 and a critical component of the city’s transportation network. She stated that the investment would help accommodate future costly for need the avoid improve safety, demands, traffic and and potentially hazardous relocation of high-voltage power infrastructure in the future. Page 14 of 17Page 28 of 166 Councilmember stating agreement, the that support expressed Perales for addressing the roadway alignment issue proactively would help avoid greater costs in the future. He noted the importance of improving alignment in areas experiencing growth and where future development impacts may not have been anticipated. Councilmember Perales stated that the proposed approach was a good opportunity to resolve the issue before it becomes more expensive and indicated his support for the agreement. MOTION: by Councilmember Perales moved, seconded Councilmember Campos MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4768, authorizing the City Manager to execute right-of-way dedication and reimbursement agreement Big Sky Developers LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company for additional right-of-way dedication along Convention Drive. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm Resolution No. 4769 - Targeted Urban Area (TUA) Tax Exemption Program Deputy City Manager Richa Sigdel declared the city's intent to designate portions of its industrial zones as targeted urban areas. She explained that the resolution also establishes a public hearing for 7:00 pm on Tuesday, September 8, at which time staff will present the program details to the City Council for review and provide an opportunity for public comment. exemption tax proposed the for support expressed Cotta Councilmember program, stating that it is an important tool for attracting and competing for new business development. He noted that the program is authorized by the State and that other cities have already implemented similar programs. Councilmember Cotta emphasized that adopting the program would help position the city to attract additional businesses and economic opportunities. MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember Cotta MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4769, declaring intent to designate portions of the city’s industrial zones as a Targeted Urban Area for the purpose of an industrial and manufacturing tax exemption and establishing a public hearing on 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 8, 2026. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos Page 15 of 17Page 29 of 166 ABSENT: Mayor Grimm UNFINISHED BUSINESS Agreement – Harris Road Realignment Agreement with VWA-Pasco, LLC, ("Visconsi") for Broadmoor Development City Manager Harold Stewart provided an overview of the proposed agreement related to roadway infrastructure improvements in the Broadmoor development area. He referenced his previous presentation on the topic and emphasized that the network transportation future the of component important an is project supporting development in the area. Stewart explained that the city has been working regarding certainty need who including developers, with Visconsi, roadway alignment and timing in order to finalize leases, sales, and agreements with future retail partners for the first phase of development. He stated that the project would be funded through existing tax increment financing (TIF) bond revenues, which are eligible for this type of roadway improvement. The city anticipates recovering a portion of the investment through transportation impact fees as development occurs in the area. He clarified that no additional financial incentives, are tax rebates, or other subsidies being provided for the development. Stewart noted that the initial phase of the Broadmoor development is viewed as a critical catalyst for future investment in the area and stated that activity and interest from developers are already increasing. He requested Council approval the commit to city would the Visconsi, with agreement which of completing the Harris Road realignment within an established timeframe, providing the developer the certainty needed to move forward with development agreements. MOTION: Councilmember Perales moved, seconded by Councilmember Hernandez MOTION: I move that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Harris Road Realignment Agreement with VWA-Pasco, LLC., ("Visconsi") in substantially the form presented, with authority to make minor administrative or non-substantive revisions as may be necessary prior to execution. RESULT: Motion carried 6-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember Campos ABSENT: Mayor Grimm NEW BUSINESS MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION Page 16 of 17Page 30 of 166 City Manager Report City Manager Harold Stewart announced that the Pasco Police Department will participate in National Night Out on August 4 from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the Pasco Sporting Complex on Home Run Road. He invited the public to attend the family-friendly event, which provides an opportunity for residents to connect with police officers, learn about available community resources, and engage in positive interactions with the Police Department. Stewart noted that the event will also provide an opportunity for the community to meet and interact with Police Chief Cook, who has served with the Pasco Police Department for more than 36 years. Additional information will be available through the City’s website and social media channels. Councilmember Perales shared a constituent’s concerns regarding fireworks activity and the impacts of fireworks use within the community. The constituent expressed frustration with ongoing fireworks-related noise, enforcement individuals to impacts concerns, including potential and challenges, safety recovering from medical treatments, residents’ ability to sleep, and distress experienced by pets. The constituent also raised concerns regarding the potential for fireworks to cause fires and supported stronger enforcement measures, including consideration of increased penalties for violations. Councilmember Perales stated that the message resonated with him and shared the concerns with the City Council for consideration. EXECUTIVE SESSION ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:37 PM. PASSED and APPROVED on _______________________. ADDITIONAL NOTES Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only) APPROVED: ATTEST: David Milne, Mayor Kystle Shanks, City Clerk Page 17 of 17Page 31 of 166 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 23, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 8/3/26 FROM: Kevin Hebdon, Director Finance SUBJECT: Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of $4,848,019.56 I. ATTACHMENT(S): Accounts Payable 07.09.26 to 07.22.26 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve claims in the total amount of $4,848,019.56 ($2,395,694.54 in Check Nos. 279471 - 279749; $1,071,606.54 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 853862 - 853870, 853873 - 853878, 853882; $21,570.75 in Check Nos. 55391 - 55429; $1,359,147.73 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30245561 - 30246323). III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 32 of 166 REPORTING PERIOD: August 3, 2026 Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'l Bank Electronic Bank Combined Check Numbers 279471 - 279749 55391 - 55429 Total Check Amount $2,395,694.54 $21,570.75 Total Checks 2,417,265.29$ Electronic Transfer Numbers 853862 - 853870 30245561 - 30246323 853873 - 853878 853882 Total EFT Amount $1,071,606.54 $1,359,147.73 $0.00 $0.00 Total EFTs 2,430,754.27$ Grand Total 4,848,019.56$ Councilmember B 100 1,318,635.72 110 15,405.90 145 2,393.91 150 29,303.99 160 3,174.33 165 2,582.80 168 33,462.51 169 135.45 170 1,992.01 180 3,412.14 185 558.17 188 51,476.86 190 487.15 194 6,698.25 195 74.00 196 HOTEL/ MOTEL EXCISE TAX 19,632.80 367 222,528.91 410 514,444.66 510 125,847.61 511 22,817.07 520 167,833.42 600 POOLED INVESTMENT 9,902.92 630 914,500.50 690 1,380,718.48 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS:4,848,019.56$ FLEX PAYROLL CLEARING UTILITY, WATER/ SEWER EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING BUSINESS MEDICAL/ DENTAL/ VISION INSURANCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STADIUM/ CONVENTION CENTER GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION MULTI-MODAL FACILITY RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LODGING REVOLVING ABATEMENT CEMETERY ATHLETIC PROGRAMS ANIMAL CONTROL AQUATIC CENTER - PPFD SENIOR CENTER OPERATING MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER AMBULANCE SERVICE Councilmember A SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND: GENERAL FUND STREET We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such claim. Harold Stewart, City Manager Kevin Hebdon, Finance Manager We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this 3rd day of August, 2026 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment: July 9 2026 to July 22, 2026 C I T Y O F P A S C O Council Meeting of: Accounts Payable Approved The City Council City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington Page 33 of 166 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 2, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 8/3/26 FROM: Maria Serra, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4770 Project Acceptance for Schlagel Park Stormwater Main replacement I. ATTACHMENT(S): Resolution 4770 Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4770, accepting work performed by Big D's Construction of Tri-Cities under contract for the Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement Project. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Engineer's Estimate $ 552,401.78 Bid Award $ 506,233.08 Change Orders $ -(22,625.44) Final Construction Cost $ 483,607.64 2025/2026 Biennium Budget and Carryover: $ 1,042,520 Stormwater Utility Fund Revenue Bond: $ 952,134 Utility Rates: $ 90,386 IV . HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background Page 34 of 166 The Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement project involves replacing aging stormwater main located in an easement in USA Corps of Engineers (USACE) land, along the western portion of Schlagel Park. The existing pipeline, which is 42 inches in diameter, serves Basin 4 of the Stormwater system, an area of 1,161 acres characterized by commercial activities and residential neighborhoods. This pipeline is immediately upstream from the Columbia River Stormwater outfall for this basin. FIGURE 1: City's Stormwater System Basins The USACE easement conditions require pipeline condition assessment at intervals and maintenance and replacement when pipe conditions warrant it. This project addresses those requirements and is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management plan. The stormwater pipeline has deteriorated and presents root intrusion and previous lining failures in a segment approximately 430 feet long. Timely replacement of the damaged stormwater infrastructure is effective in preventing sinkholes and ensure the continued safe and effective operation of the stormwater system. By addressing these issues proactively, the project supports community safety and environmental management. Page 35 of 166 Design was solicited in early 2024 and the contract was executed with MacKay Sposito on June 21, 2024. After completion of design, the Project was advertised for bids on August 20 and August 27, 2025. On September 9, 2025 at 2:00pm seven (7) bids were received and publicly opened by the City. The proposal contained two (2) bid schedules. The lowest qualified bidder was determined based on the total of both schedules. The lowest responsive bid was submitted by Big D's Construction of Tri-Cities of Pasco, WA in the amount of $ 506,233.08. The Engineer's Estimate is $ 552,401.78. Since construction began, the project required only one (1) Change Order for project, which was the reconciliation of bid items to reflect work complete for project closeout, resulting into a final construction contract cost of $483,607.64. Impact (other than fiscal) This project followed the Capital Improvement Projects Plan and refurbished damaged infrastructure, as well as added additional operational ease in maintenance. V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed Resolution accepting the work performed Park Schlagel the for Tri-Cities Construction D's Big by of Stormwater Main Replacement project. Constraints (Time or other considerations) Formal acceptance of public works projects is required by State law and starts the 45-day period within which an outside vendor, supplier or laborer would have an opportunity to file a claim against this project pursuant to RCW 60.28.011 (2). Upon completion of the 45-day lien filing period, retainage being held by the City may be released upon receipts of the following: An affidavit of no liens A release from the Department of Revenue that all taxes have been paid A release from any claims from the Department of Labor and Industries, pursuant to RCW 60.28.051 Next Steps Provided the Council accepts the project, staff will complete the necessary documentation in the following weeks. Alternatives Page 36 of 166 Council is however, work; the acceptance to not elect may accept recommended, as this improvement is completed under budget, refurbished damaged in infrastructure, and added additional operational ease maintenance. Page 37 of 166 Resolution - ________ Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement Project Acceptance- 1 Version 1.9.26 RESOLUTION NO. ________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY ___________, BIG D’S CONSTRUCTION OF TRI-CITIES, UNDER CONTRACT FOR THE ______________________ SCHLAGEL PARK STORMWATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT. WHEREAS, the work performed by __________, Big D’s Construction of Tri-Cities, under contract for Project No. ____________ 23467 has been examined by _____________ City of Pasco (City) Staff and been found to be in apparent compliance with the applicable project specifications and drawings, and WHEREAS, it is ___________ City Staff’s recommendation that the City of Pasco formally accept the contractor's work and the project as complete. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City Council concurs with __________ City Staff’s recommendation and thereby accepts the work performed by Big D’s Construction of Tri-Cities__________, under contract for Project No. ___________23467 as being completed in apparent conformance with the project specifications and drawings, and Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington State Department of Revenue of this acceptance, and Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld, pursuant to RCW 60.28.011, regulations and administrative process, shall be released upon apparent compliance with and satisfaction of applicable project specifications and verification thereof by __________________ Public Works Director, Department staff, and Finance Director. Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately. Page 38 of 166 Resolution - ________ Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement Project Acceptance- 2 Version 1.9.26 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of ________________, August, 20__.26. Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Page 39 of 166 Pasco City Council August 3, 2026 Regular Meeting Pa g e 4 0 o f 1 6 6 Acceptance of Work for Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement August 3, 2026 Pasco City Council Pa g e 4 1 o f 1 6 6 Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement Pa g e 4 2 o f 1 6 6 Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement Pa g e 4 3 o f 1 6 6 Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement Construction Costs Construction Costs Engineer’s Estimate $ 552,401.78 Bid Award $506,233.08 Change Orders $-(22,625.44) Final Construction Cost $483,607.64 Pa g e 4 4 o f 1 6 6 Questions?Pa g e 4 5 o f 1 6 6 Resolution - Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement Project Acceptance- 1 Version 1.9.26 RESOLUTION NO. ________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY BIG D’S CONSTRUCTION OF TRI- CITIES, UNDER CONTRACT FOR THE SCHLAGEL PARK STORMWATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT. WHEREAS, the work performed by Big D’s Construction of Tri-Cities, under contract for Project No. 23467 has been examined by City of Pasco (City) Staff and been found to be in apparent compliance with the applicable project specifications and drawings, and WHEREAS, it is City Staff’s recommendation that the City of Pasco formally accept the contractor's work and the project as complete. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City Council concurs with City Staff’s recommendation and thereby accepts the work performed by Big D’s Construction of Tri-Cities, under contract for Project No. _23467 as being completed in apparent conformance with the project specifications and drawings, and Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington State Department of Revenue of this acceptance, and Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld, pursuant to released upon apparent be process, shall RCW 60.28.011, regulations and administrative compliance with and satisfaction of applicable project specifications and verification thereof by Public Works Director, Department staff, and Finance Director. Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of August, 2026. Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Gabriela Sanchez Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Page 46 of 166 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 6, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 8/3/26 FROM: Craig Raymond, Deputy Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance No. 4851 - Renewing Moratorium on Essential Public Facilities (Secure Community Transition Facilities) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Ordinance No. 4851 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Conduct Public Hearing Motion: "I move to adopt Ordinance 4851, an Ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, renewing the moratorium adopted in Ordinance 4817 from August 17, 2026, to February 31, 2027; providing for interpretative authority; providing for corrections; providing for severability; and establishing an effective date." III. FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal: None anticipated at this time. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background: The Washington State Department of Social and Health Services implemented the Less Restrictive Alternative (LRA) program in an effort to distribute the housing regional to proportional state, offenders across sexual of the demographics. State law requires local jurisdictions to allow the location of these facilities. Cities do maintain some local control of the siting of these facilities regarding land use regulations but cannot regulate the operation of them. One form of LRA housing is a Secure Community Transition Facility (SCTF), treatment which provides supervised residential placement and services. Page 47 of 166 Under Washington’s Growth Management Act, SCTFs are classified as Essential Public Facilities (EPFs). State law requires local jurisdictions to allow the siting of EPFs but allows cities to regulate land use aspects such as zoning, development standards, and siting criteria, while not regulating facility operations. The public the with dealt community Kennewick of neighboring recently response to the siting of one of these facilities in one of their neighborhoods. In anticipation of the probable siting of a facility in Pasco, staff assessed Pasco’s land use regulations regarding these uses. After review, staff has determined Pasco’s land use ordinances do not currently establish a dedicated siting process or decision criteria specifically applicable to EPFs or SCTFs. Council approved a six month moratorium on applications related to essential public facilities, including EPF or SCTFs on February 17, 2026. Public feedback meetings were held on March 31st, April 15th, April 29th and May 6, 2026 to provide the community opportunities to become informed, ask questions and provide valuable feedback regarding the placement of these facilities within the community. On June 1, 2026, the City Council held a public hearing to receive testimony on draft regulations, and at a Workshop meeting held on June 22, 2026 the City Council directed staff to develop a possible special overlay zoning district where these facilities may be located. Impact (Other than Fiscal): This will be a matter of significant public concern and will likely generate community discussion and participation. V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation: On June 22, 2026, after a presentation of draft regulations, potential siting buffer zones and further discussion, the City Council directed staff to prepare a potential special overlay district and regulations for the siting of LRA's to further refine the draft regulations and siting buffer maps that staff had prepared. In order to effectively prepare the necessary supporting documentation to effectuate the Council's direction, staff recommends the City Council renew the moratorium on the acceptance of applications related to Essential Public Facilities, including Secure Community Transition Facilities until staff has prepared and Council has approved appropriate and necessary regulations addressing these topics. Page 48 of 166 Constraints (time or other consideration): It is imperative the development of these land use regulations be determined as soon as possible. Staff also recommends the coordination of additional public input during the regulation development. As such staff recommends the following: Next Steps: 1. Council approve the attached ordinance renewing the moratorium on the acceptance of applications related to Essential Public Facilities, including Secure Community Transition Facilities for a period of 6 months from the date of adoption to allow time for the development of a capacity analysis report, a special overlay district and necessary land use regulations. 2. Staff recommends a public hearing be scheduled for September 14, 2026, where a draft overlay and capacity analysis will be available for review. 3. Draft overlay and capacity analysis will be submitted to Washington state Department of Commerce no later than October 1, 2026. 4. Final Ordinance adoption will be presented to Council in December 2026. Alternatives: 1. Leave LRAs unregulated by Pasco Land Use ordinances. Page 49 of 166 Ordinance - 1 Version 7.9.26 4899-1038-9692, v. 3 {DTP4899-1038-9692;2/13206.000011/} ORDINANCE NO. __________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, RENEWING THE MORIATORIUM ADOPTED IN ORDINANCE 4817 FROM AUGUST TO 2026, 17, DECEMBER PROVIDING 2026; 31, FOR INTERPRETATIVE AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR CORRECTIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has authority under Article XI, Section 11 of the Washington State Constitution, RCW 35A.63.220, RCW 36.70A.200, and RCW 36.70A.390 to regulate land uses and adopt interim zoning controls and moratoria; an WHEREAS, at a City Council Regular Meeting held on February 17, 2026, the City Council adopted Ordinance 4817 imposing a six-month moratorium on applications related to Essential Public Facilities (“EPFs”), including Secured Community Transition Facilities (“SCTFs”) and Least Restrictive Alternatives (“LRAs”) ending on August 17, 2026; and WHEREAS, since passage of Ordinance 4817, the City developed draft regulations for the permitting process and siting requirements for EPFs, SCTFs, and LRAs and have held public workshops on March 31st, April 15th, April 29th and May 6, 2026; and WHEREAS, at a Council Workshop meeting held on June 22, 2026, after discussion and consideration, the Council directed staff to prepare a possible special overlay zoning district for SCTFs and LRAs for future consideration; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that additional time is necessary to develop a clear EPFs, SCTFs, and LRAs siting process, conduct a capacity analysis, evaluate zoning regulations and development standards, map risk-potential facilities using GIS, establish separation criteria consistent with state law, evaluate public safety and compatibility considerations, and complete other analysis, and to adopt interim or permanent development regulations; and WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220 permit a municipality to renew a moratorium for one or more six-month periods provided that the municipality holds a public hearing prior to the adoption of the renewal and adopts findings of fact stating the necessity of the moratorium renewal; and WHEREAS, without renewing the moratorium imposed by Ordinance 4817, business license and/or permit applications related to EPFs, SCTFs, and LRAs could vest under existing regulations that do not contain siting criteria or review procedures; and WHEREAS, on August 3, 2026, the City held a public hearing on renewing the moratorium in accordance with RCW 36.70A.390; and Page 50 of 166 Ordinance - 2 Version 7.9.26 4899-1038-9692, v. 3 {DTP4899-1038-9692;2/13206.000011/} WHEREAS, during the renewed moratorium period the Council intends to continue to study and develop EPF, SCTF, and LRA development regulations with input from staff and the community; and WHEREAS, the Council has further directed staff to prepare a capacity analysis for the siting of LRAs and SCTFs within the proposed zoning overlay. The staff are directed to provide a draft of the proposed zoning overlay and capacity analysis for Council’s consideration; and WHEREAS, the Council intends on providing additional opportunities for public comment on the draft permanent regulations via the public hearing process prior to adoption; and WHEREAS, it is the Council’s goal to adopt development regulations for EPFs, SCTFs, and LRAs by December 31, 2026, and in no event later than the expiration of the renewed moratorium period; and WHEREAS, renewing the moratorium established in Ordinance 4817 is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare while the City develops appropriate regulations and implements its proposed timeline for adoption of said regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings of Fact. The recitals set forth above are adopted as the City Council’s findings of fact in support of the moratorium renewal established by this ordinance. Section 2. Moratorium Renewed. The moratorium established by Ordinance 4817 is hereby renewed and shall have a new expiration date of February 31, 2027. The moratorium shall automatically expire at 11:59:59 p.m. on December 31, 2026 unless the City Council, in its sole discretion, (a) decides to formally renew this moratorium for additional periods by ordinance; or, (b) has passed all permanent amendments deemed necessary by the City Council to justify lifting of the moratorium prior to said date. Section 3. Interpretive Authority. The City Manager or designee is authorized to issue official interpretations necessary to implement this ordinance. Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this ordinance. Section 5. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including scrivener’s errors or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect within five days of Page 51 of 166 Ordinance - 3 Version 7.9.26 4899-1038-9692, v. 3 {DTP4899-1038-9692;2/13206.000011/} adoption. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of _____, 202_. Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Published: _____________________________ Page 52 of 166 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 8/3/26 FROM: Maria Serra, Director Public Works SUBJECT: *Resolution No. 4771 - Setting a Public Hearing to Consider Lightspeed Networks Inc. Franchise Extension (5 minutes) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Resolution 4771 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4771, setting 7:00 PM, August 17, 2026, as the time and date for a public hearing to consider a Fiber Optic Franchise with Lightspeed Networks, Inc. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Lightspeed Networks, Inc.is subject to a franchise fee of $1,000. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background Fiber optic cable is a telecommunications technology that uses strands of glass or plastic to transmit data as light signals. This technology allows for high- speed internet, phone service, and other data communications that support homes, businesses, schools, healthcare, and public safety operations. Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) provides for fiber optic franchises within Title 15 Telecommunications. Through a franchise agreement, the City may authorize a private provider to install and maintain fiber optic facilities within the public right-of-way, subject to City standards. Allowing access to the right-of-way supports expanded connectivity and economic development while ensuring infrastructure is installed, maintained, and regulated in a manner that protects public assets. A fiber optic franchise falls under the general provisions of PMC Chapter 15.40 Page 53 of 166 and does not qualify as either a cable system franchise, which would be covered by PMC Chapter 15.96, or a small cell system, covered under PMC Section 15.40.050 and related provisions. Lightspeed Networks, Inc has requested a renewal of their franchise for fiber optic communication facilities within the public right-of-way. This renewal of franchise agreement requires a public hearing in accordance with PMC Subsection 15.20.080(2). Impact (other than fiscal) enhances right-of-way public the infrastructure optic fiber Allowing within broadband access and reliability for residents and businesses. The franchise requires the provider to obtain permits for construction, installation, maintenance, repair, or removal of facilities, ensuring City oversight and protection of public infrastructure. V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation Before considering granting the franchise, Council must hold a public hearing. Staff recommends setting the hearing for August 17, 2026, at the regular Council meeting. Constraints (time or other consideration) The franchise process is following the process outlined in PMC 15.40. Next Steps A public hearing will be held August 17, 2026. The approval of a new franchise requires a second reading before Council, so action may be taken September 8, 2026 at the earliest. Alternatives Council may choose whether or not to move forward with the franchise after the public hearing. Page 54 of 166 Resolution - _____ - 1 Version 1.9.26 RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, SETTING 7:00 PM, AUGUST 17, 2026, AS THE TIME AND DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A FIBER OPTIC CABLE FRANCHISE WITH LIGHTSPEED NETWORKS, INC. WHEREAS, LightSpeed Networks, Inc. has applied for a fiber optic cable franchise within City of Pasco right-of-way; and WHEREAS, LightSpeed Networks, Inc. and City staff have prepared a new fiber optic cable franchise agreement; and WHEREAS, Pasco Municipal Code requires City Council to hold a public hearing prior to approving or denying a proposed fiber optic cable Franchise Agreement with NFC Northwest LLC.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That a public hearing to consider a fiber optic cable Franchise Agreement with LightSpeed Networks, Inc. will be held before the City Council of the City of Pasco in the Council Chambers at 525 N 3rd Avenue, Pasco, Washington at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on the 17th Day of August ,2026, and Be It Further Resolved, that the city Clerk of the City of Pasco give notice of said public hearing as required by law, and Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution shall take effect immediately. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of ________________, 20__. Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Gabriela Sanchez Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Page 55 of 166 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 6, 2026 TO: Harold L. Stewart II, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 8/3/26 FROM: Craig Raymond, Deputy Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: *Resolution No. 4772 - Setting Time and Date for a Public Hearing for a Right-of-Way Vacation-Portion of Road 108 ROW Vacation (VAC2026- 002) (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Resolution 4772 Exhibit A, B & C Vicinity Map AFN 1918957 AFN 1956207 Preliminary Plat Minor Adjustment Memo Right-of-Way Vacation Petition Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4772, setting 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 8, 2026, as the date and time for a public hearing to consider the vacation of a portion of the Road 108 right-of-way dedicated by AFN 1918957 and AFN 1956207. III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Introduction: As an introduction to this project, the only action requested of the City Council through this resolution is to set a public hearing for September 8, 2026, at which the Council will formally consider the proposed right-of-way vacation. Page 56 of 166 Background: On August 11, 2020, Short Plat 2020-22, located northwest of Broadmoor Boulevard and Burns Road, was recorded under Auditor's File No. 1918957. As part of the short plat approval, the easterly 30 feet of what is now known as Road 108 was dedicated as public right-of-way. Subsequently, on February 14, 2022, Auditor's File No. 1956207 dedicated the westerly 34.1 feet of the same corridor as additional public right-of-way. On May 23, 2022, the City annexed a large area that included the western portion of what is now known as Road 108, bringing the entire right-of-way corridor within the City limits. On May 25, 2021, the Hearing Examiner approved the Barker Ranch 1st Addition Preliminary Plat, which abuts the Road 108 corridor. Since that approval, final plats for three of the four planned phases have been recorded. As development planning has progressed, including preparation of Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 4 and the proposed Wilson Meadows Preliminary Plat currently under City review, staff determined that a westward realignment of Road 108 was necessary to better accommodate future development, roadway geometry, and overall site design. To implement this change, the City approved a Preliminary Plat Minor Adjustment in February 2026, modifying the alignment of Road 108 and affecting two lots and one tract within Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 4. As a result of the approved roadway realignment, portions of the previously dedicated public right-of-way are no longer needed for roadway purposes. The proposed the from areas surplus existing remove would vacation these dedication, allowing the land to be incorporated into the adjoining lots and tract. Replacement right-of-way for the revised alignment of Road 108 will be dedicated through a separate process, ensuring continuity of the roadway corridor and preserving future public access. Impact (Other than fiscal): A right-of-way vacation is the legal process by which the City relinquishes its public interest in public right-of-way that is no longer needed for transportation or other public purposes. Once vacated, the property typically reverts to the ownership of the adjoining property owner(s), subject to applicable state law and any retained public easements or rights. The proposed vacation affects approximately 6,316 square feet of excess public right-of-way that is no longer required for roadway purposes. Although this was area was dedicated as public right-of-way, no roadway ever constructed within it. The proposed vacation will not create any landlocked parcels or impair legal or physical access to adjoining properties. The future Page 57 of 166 Lane F right-of-way connection to Road 108 is not included in the proposed vacation and will remain available to accommodate future development and preserve the planned roadway network. V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the resolution setting a public hearing for September 8, 2026, to consider the proposed right-of-way vacation. Adoption of the resolution will allow the required public hearing to be held, providing affected property owners and interested parties an opportunity to comment before the City Council considers the proposed vacation by ordinance. Constraints (Time or other considerations): In accordance with PMC 12.40.040, the public hearing must be scheduled not less than 20 days and not more than 60 days after adoption of the resolution setting the hearing. Staff Analysis: As part of staff's review, the proposed right-of-way vacation was evaluated against the criteria contained in PMC 12.40.070. Staff's preliminary findings indicate the proposal is consistent with the required criteria and supports consideration of the vacation by the City Council. 1. The proposed vacation will not adversely affect traffic circulation or public access. The existing right-of-way is no longer needed due to the approved realignment of Road 108, and replacement right-of-way will be dedicated maintain to process the separate a through dedication roadway connection to future development north of the site. 2. The right-of-way is not anticipated to be needed for future transportation purposes because the revised alignment of Road 108 will continue to accommodate the City's planned transportation network. 3. parcels landlocked any create not proposed vacation The or will substantially impair legal or physical access. The affected property will continue to have access from Lane F and the realigned Road 108. 4. Staff also finds that the vacation will not adversely affect the public interest. The area proposed for vacation consists of approximately 6,316 square feet of excess right-of-way that is no longer required for public roadway purposes. Vacating this area will allow it to be incorporated into the adjoining property while maintaining the public roadway network through replacement right-of-way. Page 58 of 166 Pursuant to PMC 12.40.030(1)(e), which references PMC 12.40.120(2), the City may require the petitioner to provide an appraisal and compensate the City for the value of the right-of-way proposed for vacation. These requirements may be waived in whole or in part. Staff recommends waiving the appraisal and compensation requirements because replacement public right-of-way will be dedicated as part of the Road 108 realignment, preserving the City's planned transportation corridor. The proposed vacation implements an approved roadway design without reducing public access or diminishing the City's transportation network. Next Steps: A public hearing is scheduled for September 8, 2026, at which time the City Council will consider the proposed ordinance to vacate the identified portion of public right-of-way. Prior to the public hearing, staff will complete all required public notice, prepare the ordinance and supporting materials for City Council consideration, and request the petitioner's attendance at the public hearing. Alternatives: While PMC 12.40.070 does not prescribe specific criteria for denying a right-of- way vacation, the City Council retains the authority to deny the request if it determines the proposal is not in the public interest. If the proposed vacation is denied, the affected property owner would be unable to incorporate the excess right-of-way into the adjoining property. This could reduce the amount of developable land available and leave a remnant section of public right-of-way that is no longer needed for transportation purposes and provides little practical public benefit. Page 59 of 166 Resolution Setting PH for ROW Vacation (VAC2026-002) - 1 RESOLUTION NO. _______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON SETTING 7:00 PM, SEPTEMBER 8, 2026, AS THE TIME AND DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE ROAD 108 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED BY AUDITOR FILE NUMBER 1918957 AND AUDITOR FILE NUMBER 1956207. WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the general interest of the City of Pasco, the City Council may vacate rights-of-way; and WHEREAS, a petition for vacation of a portion of the Road 108 right-of-way dedicated by Auditor File Number 1918957 and Auditor File Number 1956207 by owners of more than two- thirds abutting the part of the street and alley to be vacated has been submitted to the City; and WHEREAS, the vacation process, by petition application, provided in the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter 12.40 requires a survey, title report, an appraisal of value, and compensation unless waived by City Council; and WHEREAS, the City may waive the requirements for a survey pursuant to PMC Section 12.40.110 if the location and legal description of the street or alley proposed for vacation is sufficiently known to the City such that an accurate legal description can be determined with certainty without a survey; and WHEREAS, pursuant to PMC Section 12.40.120, compensation for vacated rights-of- way, an appraisal and title report may be waived if one or more of the following are applicable: the vacation is initiated by Council resolution; the vacation is at the request of the City; the right- of-way to be vacated was previously determined by Council not to be essential to public traffic circulation and is available for vacation; the grant of a substitute right-of-way has value as a right- of-way at least equal to the right-of-way to be vacated; or the resulting benefit to the community of the project requiring vacation outweighs the appraised value of the right-of-way to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City staff is requesting that Council make a determination concerning whether to waive the requirements of a title report, appraisal of value, and compensation pursuant to PMC 12.40.120(2) after holding a public hearing; and WHEREAS, PMC Section 12.40.040 requires public hearings on vacations to be fixed by resolution, and to provide notice for such hearing which shall occur no later than sixty (60) days after, nor earlier than twenty (20) days after, the passage of this Resolution setting a public hearing. Page 60 of 166 Resolution Setting PH for ROW Vacation (VAC2026-002) - 2 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: Section 1. Notice of Hearing. That a public hearing be held to consider vacating the right-of-way described below as further described in Exhibit A, depicted in Exhibit B, and further described by the Curve Table in Exhibit C, all attached hereto, will be held before City Council of the City of Pasco in the Council Chambers at 525 N. Third Avenue, Pasco, Washington at the hour of 7:00 p.m., on the 8th day of September 2026: A VARIABLE WIDTH PORTION OF ROAD 108 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED PER SHORT PLAT NUMBER 2020-22 RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF SHORT PLATS AT PAGES 361-362 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1918957 AND PER DEDICATION DEED TO FRANKLIN COUNTY RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956207, LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST NORTHWEST AND THE QUARTER SOUTHWEST THE OF QUARTER QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 6, MARKED BY A 2-1/2 INCH ALUMINUM BEING 20100532", LS CAP STAMPED: "SURVEYJOE NORTH 00°55'29" EAST A DISTANCE OF 2660.55 FEET FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, MARKED BY A 3 INCH BRASS CAP, THENCE NORTH 89"18'23" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 6 A DISTANCE OF 30.01 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD 108; THENCE SOUTH 00°55'29" WEST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 160.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°22'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 7.53 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS THENCE FEET; ALONG SAID CURVE, OF 20.00 HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 28.77 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 82"25'05", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 49"24'44" WEST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 26.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 08"12'11" WEST A DISTANCE OF 67.75 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 480.04 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 76.50 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 09°07'49", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 03"38'16" WEST, AND A CHORD LENGTH THE SOUTHWEST OF 76.42 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE NORTH 89°19'04" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 14.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 61 of 166 Resolution Setting PH for ROW Vacation (VAC2026-002) - 3 TOGETHER WITH: A VARIABLE WIDTH PORTION OF ROAD 108 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED PER SHORT PLAT NUMBER 2020-22 RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF SHORT PLATS AT PAGES 361-362 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1918957, LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP WILLAMETTE OF EAST THE RANGE NORTH, 9 29 MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 6, MARKED BY A 2- 1/2 INCH ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED: "SURVEYJOE LS 20100532", BEING NORTH 00°55'29" EAST A DISTANCE OF 2660.55 FEET FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, MARKED BY A 3 INCH BRASS CAP, THE OF NORTH LINE THE ALONG NORTH 89"18'23" THENCE EAST SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 6 A DISTANCE OF 30.01 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD 108; THENCE SAID EAST SOUTH 00"55'29" WEST ALONG RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 224.18 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00"55'29" WEST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 114.51 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 771.32 FEET; THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 89"22'56" WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 95.45 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 07"05'26", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 04"09'47" WEST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 95.39 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE TURNING TO THE RIGHT, HAVING THENCE FEET, OF A RADIUS 20.00 ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 22.41 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 64"10'47", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 24"22'54" EAST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 21.25 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING A TOTAL COMBINED AREA OF 6,316 SQUARE FEET, 0.14 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. Section 2. That the City Clerk of the City of Pasco give notice of said public hearing as required by law. Page 62 of 166 Resolution Setting PH for ROW Vacation (VAC2026-002) - 4 Section 3. That the City Council will decide whether to waive the requirements for an appraisal, title report, and compensation after the September 8, 2026, public hearing. Section 4. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of ________________, 20__. Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Gabriela Sanchez Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Page 63 of 166 LU LHDI H UIQ 6,MARKEDB Y IHI‘IUE Ul'LUUU. A 3 INCH BRA S Page 64 of 166 Page 65 of 166 Page 66 of 166 Page 67 of 166 Vicinity Item2.Portion of Road 108 ROW Vacation Appllcant(s):Trey TuttMapFile#:VAC 2026—002 1 WW mm}. A‘Iantu:DI Road 108 85 170 340 510 | Feet Pa g e 6 8 o f 1 6 6 TW N B HP . “NO R TH MU N T Y: FR AN KL I N 1 of 5 Fi l i n g In s t r u m e n t BO B B I DO B S O N - RE T T E R E wmu n Fu n : - on . W MI N G » : sp u n - I I I In a - m u . Ae r l m m ‘ l SP 00 m $2 0 7 . 5 0 Ma t t Be a t e n , Au d i t o r , Fr a n k l i n Co u n t y , WA . CO M P A N Y AF N I 19 1 8 9 5 7 SP Re c o r d e d 08 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 0 10 : 4 0 AM Pa g e : BR O A D M O D R BL V D . CU R V E P. l . . SH O RIILA I SE E SU R V E Y AF N ma n n a MO M ‘.20 2 0 - 22 ST E E T 2 _ WE T , ' ' LO C A T E D IAPO R TI O N OF TH E N11 2 OF TH E SE11 4 AN D TH E SW 1 I 4 OFTH E SE 11 4 OF CA P . La I EA S T OF I SE C T I O N T O W N S H IP9NO R T H . RA N G E 29EA S T . OFTH E WI L L A M E I T E ME R I D I A N . CI T Y ”? ? a ? f ’ i ’ -. 09 co m m m SE O ' O N S 5 II 5 OF PA S C O . FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y . WA S H I N G T O N . mm mm : __ w w __ _ _ _ . ., m5 I 3& 3 m e .m g c m LE G E N D a.AB B R E V I A T I O N S - __ . == FR O M FO U N D MO N U M E N T : ‘ ' r _‘ (9SE T SI B ' x31 1 " IR O N RE B A R \M T H YE L L O W PL A S T I C OF 93 1 2 n g A; GE E N T E I : g ga Es ; me E1 1 ) . mm a F n; ’ «r ”6 ‘ 3 “ OA P s r A M P E D : 'M A T A R A Z Z O 4 6 8 1 B ‘ INTH I S SH O R T , I. ' EL O . ' 22 6 , 0 0 1 - 5 ; . .. ,. . PL A T wi l l - W E . CI T Y OF PA S ! » : II ; 5 a I! » E AS Ev 1 3 I Rm < E/ 5. 1 9 m \I I O O ' S O ' O O ' E ' : CO N T R O L PO I N T 95 _: . q .I . E g w 56 ?o a t i n g - 1 0 % 5 ?g l/ [ 7 1 2 8 ] \ I \ ”M y 5 mu m : ©FO U N D 5m - RE B A R A S NO T E D ' E Q 32 ’ 5 AT s' P I N H O I E g >_ _ . ’9 , . ’ .5| 9 ,W ' I , ’ ; ? ‘ m d9 FO U N D IF N D ) S'BR A s s c A F A S NO T E D ‘1 E u 3' 4 E g2 WW I ” -' r‘ E 3 0 9 1 9 1' =30 0 ' oCA L C U L A T E D PO I N T NO T FO U N D OR SE T . F' . - ' —, .— I a N ' ; iI a E 3' 3 I1 2 2 \2 / B II a; E _, 9- m e 00 0 0 : ) RE C O R D IN F O R M A H O N PE R BU R E A U OF E I, 33 : 3 5 - 4 34 9 a a 12 8 5 . 1 ? 4 ' S I F - I g 5% I .. ._ § 3 g RE C L A M A T I O N FA R M UN I T MA F mu s — 2 0 5 0 9 . 1 3 \\ : \ .I 1. 1 1 3 . 0 3 S S F 3 13 0 6 . 0 1 B S . F . I' — 29 m “ i 23 8 I I ?g x Eh E FN D FO U N D 7: I ,I 21 1 5 5 AC IN a 27 m m 3 F E u . A 9- E ": 1 1 SE CT TO II DI A G RA M §A : I I 93 1 ‘ '3 a I" g E 3 E3 8 §_ ‘ _ MR K ‘ D MA R K E D ,_ 5 : 1? : l' " ' 3; cf ) BE N E F I T I O F PA R C E L : 9 .. - ? 2 " E AcAC R E S g d E in «A K I; 49 ¢ : \ I; 5 \I A . 11 5 - 1 5 0 — 1 1 5 5 E E II a 2. . 2 '— _. ’ .- z E EE :3 K M $9 7 US E R “ . cm ? ‘ ? r . : o AF N AU D I T O R FI L E NU M B E R E'5 g I I g ?? é d ’ g ‘ I la ‘ q u m ) g L#DE N D T E S LI N E DA T A . SE E TA B L E V5 : 19 " ) W 5 - ~t : . - l xxs. F . SQ U A R E FE E r .— .4 , 4 . CA S E AT aR m N O O R '5 ‘5 ° - 9 $3 8 9 3 5 ‘9 9 I I H 5 30 ’ “ WM PM SE E SE C SE C T I O N _I 5 g 3 3 10 ‘ IR R I G A T I O N 55 m & (p 9 “3 : 9 9 II ; SU R V E Y ”' N ”" 9 0 5 x' g 8 gg “5 2 5 % 33 3 m Q ‘9 (9 ‘ I // : . asWEX I S H N O RI O H T - O F — W A Y I FE R AF N 73 2 E8 'H E \ K II ' Z O L J B I ‘ I 11 1 9 . 5 0 ' I I. ’ w A m, NR20EES M T EA S E M E N T _ - — - —, ~ —— ' —. -- - — ' —' - ~_ "5 9 - 2 3 1 0 1 ma m a — 4 / —v U. s . B . R UN I T E D S T A T E S BU R E A U oF R E C I . A M A 1 1 0 N DE E g; ma s - a w e 13 3 1 . 3 6 _ ‘I ‘ (s a n s - m - L ‘ w a _ .. _ . ‘ cu : AT 51 / 1 5 CO R N E R g L, 83 30 - M. g I 09 " / OF sa / s s S m P. U . D . PU B U O U1 1 | J T Y DI S T R I C T II ) =5 HE R E B Y pa n a m a 5 59 ° 6 5 In 0 " (V O L . PG . ) VO L U M E FA C E ; I / Am 17 5 1 E “‘ ‘ 75 1 . 0 1 : ‘ sa o u ' y | m ”N ”6 1 a 3 5% ——-—-—SE C T I O N OF SE C T I O N SU B - D I V I S I O N LI N E ‘- NB D ‘ n ' M ' E 13 5 1 . 3 5 ‘ " l I _ 8 I‘ . ‘ n. ————EX I S T I N G RI O H T O F - W A Y _ “m a ~ 30 ' R/ w . 38 % ag é o m u o g é PL A T BO U N D A R Y 40 ' Am a. ” g RO A D h cj ? ‘ I “m 5 ” "E m m a 2' 2 ‘3 9 - o £5 5 7 2 v a AF N Iv ' é a m e ———RI G H T - O F J N A Y C E N T E R U N E a: mf g g g u m m ': I 9“ “ ! 5 33 g 33 0 SE NE W LO T IJ N E SP . nu n s — 1 4 = . .— , .. —— — — — — — — — — EX I S T I N G BA S E M E N T AF N 15 4 9 3 9 7 h 1. 2 5 % } . _ -_ _' ?g .- NO T E : I F . / _’ , . _ ’3 3 Ig g SE E BH E E r z F O R DE W L S .A . “W i g w a m ON —— -——————EX I S T . LO T / P R O P E R T Y LI N E I A D J A C E N T ) ; g — 2- : ? 3; TH I S SH E E T . Ex I s T I N O ED G E OFDI R T RO A D aO ' AD G E S S £5 t h 3 l . / .- ‘| E8 SE E SH E E T a F O R BL O W UP DE T A I L O F U SB R . DR A IN PE R EI S E / I .‘ '1 I I 5 DE V I A ' H O N AC R O S S LO T 5_ ““ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ EX I S T I N G ED G E OFGR A V E L RO A D ”N W 2 | —-—I— r —BO S T I N O E D C E O F D R A I N A O E C A N A L DE T A I L CF . 35 5 % “ T n —— — — — — — — — — EX I S H N O BU I L D I N O I S T R U C T U R E RS ? m T S “S i g n “ ? m A ET I E N N E “ "E E D ’ SU R V E Y RE F E R E NC E S = . . ‘ , _ , _] '1 7 3 3 9 1 5 . EA S T E L Y IF SE C T I W — PE R SJ R V E Y AF N um ”' g é ? r é o g a m ? . -_ ’_ . __ . _ . _ . _. T ° 6 5 gf a g i m n ED I } Q U IT CL AI MDE E D FI L E D UN D E R AF N 17 3 3 9 1 6 DA T E D MA Y 06 . 20 0 9 RE C O R D S OF T "5 9 . 2 3 . ” ? mm , _, L- - -— D AD I - 0 0 . 0 0 F R A N K LI N CO U N TY . WA S H I N G T O N 0 (m w ‘ B - E .3 3 . “ ) g as {D 2 } $2 " Og U EE T YHw n g é l a ‘ AF N 17 5 4 5 7 9 DA T E ) AU G U S T 19 . 20 1 0 RE C O R D S OF. MO O “ z' : "I N F O R M S . 52 @1 3 2 ? 2; ER R O R / F O S S “ “A m m a m m m su m s? g } ; “M I N I : PA R C E L y o P RT ‘ E S ' E 9m m : . SE _ ms 8’ 5' a a: 7 [R 1 ] No . 2 m B — OB (V O L 2OF SH O R T FL A T S . PG . 24 6 . AF N 15 9 3 4 0 1 ) BY MU L T I P L E PU N E H E . SH O W N E R2 S H O R T PL A TNo . 7 7 — 3 0 (V O L . 1OF SH O R T FL A T S . PG . 70 . AF N 37 5 9 3 6 ) BYRO E R S . AT 0' - OF CA P [R 3 ] S H O R T PL A TNO I 2 0 1 8 —1 4 (V O L . 2OF S- I O R T FL A T S . PG . 70 . AF N 18 4 9 3 6 7 ) BYDY C K L NO T E S : R4 R E C O R D OF SU R V E Y OO U N T Y RO A D PR O J E C T (C R P ) 59 : 5 RO A D To o / D E N T EX T E N S I O N S BA S I S OF BE A R I N G S 1) AS A C O N D m O N OF AP P R O V A L ' O F ' T H I S ‘ S H O R T ”A r m s OW N E R (V O L 3OF SU R V E I S.PG . 42 6 . AF N 17 5 3 9 0 5 ) BYCH R I S T E N S O I . "A D ”W A S H I N G T O N ST A T E F L A N E SO U T H Z O N E [R 5 ] S U R V H FO R EY E S (V O L 1,PG . 16 . AF N 34 6 4 4 0 ) BYBE C K E R . A eR I D BE A R I N G OF BO O - 5 5 2 w AL O N G TH E WE S T LI N E OF TH E SE 11 4 OF WA ' V E D “" 5 ““ 5 " " 7° “M E — S T ““ 5 me o " ”A m e “ EM E IM P R O V E M E N T DI S T R I C T ?G R SE W E R M A T E R I R O A D I S I D E W A L K l SE C T I O N 6‘ “N ‘ RZ B E . W‘ M ' B EN FO U N D MO N U M E N T S IM P R O V E M E N T S TO T H E ' F y t L EX T E N T A ‘ S PE R M I T T E D BY Rc w 35 . 4 3 . 1 1 1 2 . 1m : .II F I D ' I I - z mu : - OR I O N - 2 : 11 1 1 5 RE P O R T "0 1 - 5 3 2) LO T AR E A S SH O W N ON ’ T H I S SH O R T PL A T ‘ I N C L U D E TH E LA N D A R E A FO R ,'I ? l i i l - S H I I I I. ) TH E PA R C E L SH O W N HE R E I N IE I SU B J E C T To AD D I T I O N A L WA T E R OR SE W E R FA C I a n TA P ag g g m ? s 0" “‘ 6 ' “ OF WA Y BE I N G DE D I C A T E D As PA R T 0" ““ 5 ga g :7m OR CO N N E C T I O N CH A R G E PE R NO ‘ H C E FI L E D UN D E R A F N 15 3 5 4 1 0 . ~ LL 15 5 4 2. TH E PA R C E L SH O W N HE R E I N IS SU B J E C T TO WA T E R CO N N E C T I O N FE E S FE R AG R E E M E N T ’H L E D UN D E R m. 1a m . AU D I T O R ‘ S CE R T I F I C A TE 3. ) TH E PA R C E L SH O W N HE R E I N Is SU B J E C T TO TE R M S CO N D m O N s a PR O V I S I O N S FI L E D F RE C O R D WI T H TH E F R A N K IJ N GO U N T YA U D I T OR B OF F I C E WI S i I m — D A Y OF 20 2 0 ?l m M- IN CO N T A I N E D IN CI T Y OF PA S C O OR D I N A N C E NO . 43 3 0 FI L E D UN D E R AF N 15 5 3 5 3 5 . 0 U SH O R T FL A T S P A G EEO U E S T OF PB S EN G I N E E R I N G AN D RO N M E N T A L A. ) TH E PA R C E L SH O W N HE R E I N Is SU B J E C T TO AG R E E M E N T OF PE R M A N E N T R E I E A S E OF WA T E R AL L O T M E N T a TH E TE R M S . CO N D F n O N S S PR O V I S I O N S FI L E D UN D E R AF N 13 5 0 3 2 1 . FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y AU D I T O R KI J N CO U N T V AU D I T O R SU R V E Y O R ' S CE R n F I C A T E IN D E X ”S M / I | AL E X A N D E R D. MA T A R A z z o . RE G I S T E R E D As A PR O F E S S I O N A L LA N D SU R V E Y U R BY TH E ST A T E OF WA S H I N G T O N HE R E B Y CE R T I F Y TH A T TH I S SH O R T PL A T Is AT R U E AN D CO R R E C T RE P R E S E N T A ' I T O N OF CL I E N T . mn u m mu m NO : mm TH E TH E LA N D S AC T U A L L Y SU R V E Y E D AN D DE S C R I B E D HE R E I N AN D LO C A T E D IN A PO R T I O N OF SE C T I O N 8. "5WM ” W TD B N . R2 8 E . W. M . wm "; 10 6 SU R V E Y O R : AI £ x D.MA T A R A a D DA T E mu m W5 09 “21 3 3 39 0 6 52 DA L I : BY : AD M DR A W N BY : OW W Su n s - 1' - S w , I SE C T I O N : (BRA N G E BE A S T . ‘ ' ‘ v ‘ / , pm n RE G I S T R A H O N NO . 46 8 1 8 r_ _ ' z / g s / a o z a DI T V ‘ : PA B C O SH E E T _1 _ OF _ § _ Pa g e 6 9 o f 1 6 6 I FW D — 0 . 5 ( $5 U. S . E . R . CA N A L 2- : g 1 E U1 2 8 IR I S LA N E ] __ _ _ _ _ 'l | |_ _ _ _ ?g I I g __ I I; I ~N 0 u s z ~ | 13 I I I__ _ _ _ _ _ _ l l I I __ __ _ _ I | [. 1 ~V A 1 L HM S » - Sc a l e 1' = 20 ' DE T A I L "A " SI » 1 =2 0 I- kg I LA T T ' M E" . sm g t f m m g E” I K L0 1 3 . 'I n E; 1. 3 1 EA S T or OS N T E R or i SE C T I O N MO N U M E N T . 0. 4 '_ _ __ “E L E V / £ R F ' E . _ __ 'O G ' E 06 L5 1 A RE M A T I W g 8 ER m CA P AT E‘ '- In OE N T E R O? A $- 5 RE iC T I O N B. 1. 5 v- “ a sn o w SO R T - A D E g5 — g, .5 kg cm 0F Fm v- z :i E CO N T R O L PO I N T - '4 Ii E; 95 ?g , l g E 5“ '3 4 I .2 II I '5 «5 8 ? ‘ § 5 _= ' I- m e S 3 __ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ is : 5 9 $3 3 3 3 . 5 S, 4 _ 2 :: EE E S E "’ ' a Eé u é DE I ' A I L "B " N. T . S . SH O RT PL A T 2L LO C A T E D IN A PO R T I O N OF T H E N1/ 2OF TH E SE1/ 4AN D TH E SW1/ 4OF TH E SE1/ 4OF SE C T I O N 6. TO W N S H I P 9 NO R TH . R A N G E29EA S T , OF TH E WI L L A M E T I ' E ME R I D I A N , CI T Y OF PA S C O. F R A N K L I NCO U N T Y . WA S H I N G T O N . LE G EN D &AB B RE V I AT T O NS © SE T S / B' X S D ‘ IR O N R E BA R W I TH Y E L LD W P L AS T I C CA P sT A M F E D : -M A T A R A z z o «3 3 1 3 ' INTH I S SH O R T PL A T © FO U N D 51 9 - RE D A R A s NO T E D Q Fo u N D (F N D ) a- aR A s s CA P AsNO T E D o CA L C U LA T E D PO I N T , NO T FO U N D 0RSE T 00 0 0 0 RE C O R DIN F O R M A 1 1 0 N FE R BU R E A U OF RE O L A MA T I O NFA R M UN I T MA P 22 2 - 1 1 3 4 0 5 0 9 4 3 FN D FO U N D MR K ‘ D MA R K E D Ac . AC R E S AF N AU D I T O RFI L E NU M B E R LT : DE N O T ESLI N E DA T A , SE E TA B L E sT F . SQ U A R EFE E T SE c . SE D T T o N RA N EX I S T I N GRI G H T - O F - W A Y ES M T EA S E M EN T U. S . B . R . UN I T E D ST A T E S BU R E A U OFRE C L A M A T T O N P. U . D . PU B L I C UT I L I ' I ' Y DI S T R I c T (V O L , PG . ) VO L U M E,PA G E — —— — — — SE C 1 1 0 NOF SE O T T O N SU B - D I V I S I O N LI N E —— — — —— - — — EX I S T T NORI G H T - O F - W A Y FL A T BO U N D A R Y RI G H T - OF - W A Y cE N T E R L I N E NE w LO T LI N E —— — — — — — — — — EX I s n NG EA S E M E N T —— — — — EX I S T . LO T I P R O P E R ’ TYLI N E I A D J A c E N T ) EX I S T I N GED G E OFDI R T RO A D EX I S T T NG ED G E OFGR A V E L RO A D —— — — — — — EX I S T I N GED G E OFDR A I N A G E CA N A L EX I S T T NGBU I I D I N G / ST R U G ’ T U R E AU D I T O R ' S CE R ' I 1 F I C A T E FI L E D FO R RE G O WI T H TH E FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y DI ' I ' OR S TH I S I41 DA Y“A W 20 2 0 AT 10 : 4 0 tM . IN VO L U M E 0F SH O R T FL A T S AT FA AT TH E R EOF PB S EN G I N E E R I AN D ig z ? o g E E ? FR A N K L I N CO NW AU D I T O R FR A N KL I N CO UN TYAU D I T O R IN D E X NO . CL I E N T : BA R K E R TR U S T PR O J E C T ND . : m wa s ba l m - i n n ll d in d i u m - n i l IM - BU R V E Y D R : AL E X n.MA T A R A z z o DA T E WI ] 40 0 Br a i n y BM ] . S E 1 0 6 Rl d l l a n d . WA 89 3 6 2 we av : An u DR A W N av : wa SC A L E NI A 50 9 . 0 4 2 . 1 3 0 0 mm : InRA N G E 2:EA S T Wm cr r v : FmDR E E r _3 _ OF J. TW P . OBNO R T H MU N ' I ' Y: FR AN IG J N gg o u a 5. 5 3 48 3 3 Hu m a n 5. . » o n uu m s a u u m i 95 1 E n no N "w a g mm "g o o n :4 32 . : 33 2 : : uu u u o u m m p3 3 3 .. F2 .5 » .3 5 6 0 53 : 5 » £3 3 5 .a o u m a m yu m : Pa g e 7 0 o f 1 6 6 TW N B H IP : UN DR T H BO U N TY : FR AN IG J I AF N II 19 1 8 9 5 7 Re c o r d e d 08 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 0 SP Pa g e : 3 of 5 Fi l i n g In s t r u m e n t $2 0 7 . 5 0 BO B B I DO B S O N - RE T ’ I ' E R AF N - I n m r l s v wI I m m m m “m mma m m 5 Pa r k ) 52 0 7 — 5 Ma t t Be a t e n , Au d i t o r , Fr a n k l i n Co u n t y , WA . 10 : 4 0 AM Do c ' l ‘ y p e 5 CO M P A N Y 10 ' RN HW Y DE D I C A T E D 4” RN PE R SH O R TPL A T 0.20 2 0 - 22 L O C A T E D INAPO R T I O N OF TH E N1/ 2 OFTH E SE1I 4 AN D TH E SW1/ 4OF T H E SE OF SE C T IO N 5.TO W N S H I P 9NO R T H . RA N G E 29EA S T , OFTH E WI L L A M E I ’ I ’ E ME R I DI A N .CI T Y OFPA S C O . FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y . WA S H I N G T O N . LE G E N D 8x AB B R E V I A T I O N S © SE I ' 5/ 8 ' xw IR O N RE B A R WI T H YE L L O W PL A S T I C CA P ET A M p E D : 'M A T A R A Z O 46 3 1 8 ‘ IN TH I s sH o m FI A T © FO U N D 5/ 0 - RE B A R As NO T E D 4) FO U N D (F N D ) 5' BR A S S CA P As NO T E D O CA L C U L A T E D PO I N T , NO T FO U N D 0R EH 00 0 0 : ) RE C O R D IN F O R M A T I O N PE R BU R E A U OF 75 1 . 0 3 ' RE C L A M A T I O N FA R M UN r r MA P 22 2 . 1 1 5 . 2 m e 3 A NM Q Z ' M ' E 13 3 1 . 5 8 ' \ l FN D FO U N D I MR K ’ D MA R K E D I An . AO R E s AF N AU D I T O R FI L E NU M B E R L# DE N O T E s LI N E DA T A . SE E TA B L E S. F . BO U A R E FE E I ' SE C . se c n o u I w EX I S T I N G RI G H T - O F - W A Y ES M T EA S E M E N T U. 8 . B . R . UN I T E D ST A T E S BU R E A U OF RE C L A M A T I O N % P. U . D . PU B L I C UT I L I T Y DI S T R I C T ow (V O L .PG . ) VO L U M E . PA G E ‘3 ? 5 —— —- - — , — SE c n 0 N OF s E c n O N SU B - D M S I O N LI N E “0 % g I E | —— - — — — — EX I S ' I T N G RI G H T - O F W V A Y 9% . / g g 3 I PL A T BO U N D A R Y ‘ / E z. E —— RI G H T - O F - W A Y OE N T E R L I N E %E 3; NE W LO T uN E ‘- EE 3 EX I S T I N G EA S E M E N T <I / . ’9 ' Q8 EX I S T . LO T / P R O P E R T Y LI N E ( A D J A c E N T ) / E§ I BO S T I N G ED G E OF DI R r RO A D / Q / 5 | EX I S 1 1 N G ED G E OF GR A V E L RO A D _/ _ ‘x _ / I / IE ; I —- - — , — , — EX I S T I N G E D G E O F D R A I N A G E O A N A L / Q. / g g —— — — — — — — — — EX I S T 1 N G BU I L D I N G / S T R U C T U R E / 59 ‘ / / a /' ?/ ’ / n/ / , / - / . / \ R/ w HE R E B Y DE D I C A T E D / / / _ / 30 ' ma s s ES M / / / \/ _ _ / / FE R LE A S E / ’ / _ ~ AF N 55 5 0 1 2 | . / / I /_ / w’ A c c a s E s u T I / /_ . / — ~ _ . . I = : hR E S E R V A ‘ ? D N F D R / J’ w " Fu ' r u n e n o m /_ _ . 1 / : 7 - / SP . zo I a — u I _, _ ‘. ~- - / AF N 13 4 9 3 5 7 ./ / . I /_ I I I __ ._ ,4 _ — — .. —I I— NW M ' E Im . 4 2 ’ — — ._ . —I ua n s s n s c I S 33 ‘ 3 " a" ; "I / / / BU R N S RO A D su m s R0 A D . F A U 5 1 . B : 5 ' ,, __ _ — - EA S I E R L Y or se c n o u 4— 7 - / — LI N E . cm OF PA S O U ~ I H CO N T R O L P D I N T M 0. , / __ _ _ . _ . . \' _ _ _ _ _ — na e - z é ' o f s f 1: 3 1 . 3 7 : IS 55 4 5 1 . (S I B N‘ D - E — I N I A Q ) BR A S S CA P AT 1/ 4 CO R N E R CO M M O N TD SE C T I W S B k 7 MT H MU L T I P L E PU N C H E S . sn o w AT a. or cA F A I I us a ? o m w DI S C R E P A N C Y DE T A I L \v / V ’ I BO ‘ AU D I T O R ' S CE R T I F I C A T E < - FI L E D FO R RE C O R D WI T H TH E FR A N K l J N CO U N T Y DI T O R S OF F I C E TH I S 'I I ‘ DA Y OF 20 2 0 AT IW RM . IN VO L U M E E OF SH O R T FL A T S AT PA G E TT H E RE Q U E S T OF PB S EN G I N E E R I AN D I: FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y AU D I T O R U1 7 FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y AU D I T O R IN D E X No . Iq , . I_ : m , o / an a o 55 0 . : 4 'w IIEg g ? “ Ige g k ? / ué s g ‘-U. I //////I //I/______ ____///u. s . B . R . DR A I N /_—//'/_—————-————’ . A// /// ' .//" - ’ C / I ./'11 — — B .// '"—I'7 : /-._. -/ / '"?y 'g I? 6‘ I:I |Ez"E '5mA? E Sc a l e 1' = 8 0 ' EE 18 0 lg I30 ' RM HD T E B Y DE D I C A I I I, \IL ?n -"Eh E Im a m mm PR O I E c T N m m3 : FI S E n g l h nd n g u I d MU M SU R V E Y D R : AL B I D L N I A T A R A z z O DA T E mm mo m m s m jm o e WW A W ma y ; AD M DR A W N E Y : wa BC A l E ' 1 ' I m ' 60 9 . 8 4 2 . 16 0 0 Wm BE G I I O N . onRN I G E : II E A S T cr r v : PA S O O SH E E T _ L 0 F _ L Pa g e 7 1 o f 1 6 6 AF N ! nu n s ) SP (I m a m Im a m In a - m m a pu n - u n i s : Fu l ? l 01 - . WA SO U T H CO L U M B I A BA S I N IR R I G A T I O N DI S T R I C T AP P R O V A L BU R E A U OF RE C L A M A T I O N ' S CO N C U R R E N C E IS LI M I T E D TO TH E EX T B I T ' OF TH E FL A T S CO M P L I A N C E WI T H TH E RE Q U I R E M E N T S OF RO W 58 . 1 7 3 1 0 DR A I N CO N S T R U C T I O N : RI S I N G GR O U N D WA T E R TA B L E S AR E CO M M O N IN IR R I G A T I O N PR O J E C T S . FE D E R A L DR A I N CO N S T R U C T I O N FU N D S AR E NO T AV A I L A B L E FO R DR A I N A G E OF SU B D I V I S I O N S AN D OT H E R AR E A S NO T IN A CO M M E R C I A L AG R I C U L T U R A L LA N D US E UN L E S S SU C H DR A I N A G E IS IN C I D E N T A L TO TH E RE O U I RE D DR A I N A G E OF AD J A C E N T AG R I C U m e LA N D S AN D ME E T S FE D E R A L TE C H N I C A L AN D EC O N O M I C A L FE A S I B I L I T Y RE Q U I R E M s t TH I S LA N D I5 IN C L U D E D WI T H I N TH E SO U T H CO L U M B I A BA S I N IR R I G A T T O N DI S T R I C T AN D IS SU B J E C T TO TH E LA W S OF TH E UN I T E D ST A T E S AN D TH E ST A T E OF WA S H I N G T O N RE L A T I V E TO TH E CO L U M B I A BA S I N PR O J E C T AN D IS LI A B L E FO R FU R T H E R AS S E S S M E N T S . IF AN Y . LE V I E D BY SA I D DI S T R I C T . IT IS AL S O UN D E R S T O O D AN D AG R E E D TH A T WH E N SA I D PL A T IS SE R I E D BY CO U N T Y RO A D S TH A T AL L IR R I O A B L E LA N D S WI T H I N TH E RO A D RI G H T OF WA Y OR IS O L A T E D BY SA I D DE D I C A T I O N WI L L NO T BE C O M E A CH A R G E AS S E S B A B L E TO FR A N K I J N CO U N T Y AN D PA Y A B L E TO TH E SO U T H CO L U M B I A BA S I N IR R I G A T I O N DI S T R I C T FO R OO N S ' T R U PE R A T I O N AN D MA I N T E N A N C E OF TH E PR O J E C T . a _ E m (c f /2 8 ' M0 DI CT SE C -M ER DA T E I 1' 3° 2. o BU R E A U OF RE C L A M A T I O N A WA T E R SU P P L Y : CO N C U R R H I C E BY T H E BU R E A U OF RE C L A M A T I O N FO R TH I S PL A T DO E S NO T AS S U R E TH E AV A I L A B I L I T Y OF A WA T E R SU P P L Y . NO R DO E S IT BI N D TH E UN I T E D ST A T E S TO IS S U E A PE R M A N E N T RI G H T FO R A FE D E R A L WA T E R SU P P L Y . A SU P P L Y OF FE D E R A I PR O J E C T WA T E R TO TH I S LA N D IS AS S U R E D ON L Y UP O N FU L L CO M P L I A N C E WI T H CO R O L L A R Y FE D E R A L AN D ST A T E LE G I S L A T I O N . (A IL V E ' I B R I G ' I T DR IN D O K C I ’ VI C I N I T - Y MA P N. T . 8 . FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y TR E A S U R E R - A P P R O V A L I HE R E B Y CE R T I F Y TI - M T ' I H E TA X E S ’ A N D A S S I EN T S ON TH E LA N D DE S C R I B E D HE R E O N HA V E 0. . TA X PA R C E L NU M B E R 11 5 1 8 0 0 7 3 . SA I Q O DA T E BE E N PA I D TO AN D IN C L U D I N G W1 3 0 . r ‘ ”e x ? m ? \I BI G BE N D EL E C T R I C A L CO - O P E R A ' I T V E . IN C AP P R O V A L L\ /\ TH E UT I U T Y EA S E M E N T BH O W N H E R E D N A R E HE R E B Y AP P R O V E D FO R TH E BI G BE N D EL E C T R I C A L CO O P R E A T T V E . IN C . 2 CA L CO O P E R A T W E F I N C ' R E P R E S E N T A ‘ I T V E DA V BI G BE N D E CI T Y OF PA S C O AP P R O V A E S r' I .— TH E AN N SH O R T PL A T Is HE R E B Y AP P R O V E D BY AN D FO R TH E cr r v OF PA S C O . ST A T E or WA S H I N I E I L I 3 EN G I N E E R TE .2 0 19 PA S C O TH E AN N E X E D SH O R T PL A T IS I H I E R E B Y — A P P R O V E D BY AN D FO R TH E CI T Y F PA S C O . ST A T E OF W G | 3 I 02 . 0 30 10 Lo PA S G O NE R TE 5U U OF RE C L A M A T I O N DA AU D I T O R ' S CE R T I F I C A T E 1h FI L E D FO R RE C O R D WI T H TH E FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y DI T O R S OF F I C E TH I S I DA Y OF 20 2 0 AT MI 11 M . IN VO L U M E Z or SH O R T FL A T S AT 9 T FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y AU D I T O R TY IN D E X NO . 01 6 KI J N CO U N T Y AU D I T O R AT TH E RE Q U E S T OF PB S EN G I N E E R I N AN D ,_ _ _ _ _ d 7 ' / , ¢ B / A u n SH O RT PL A T O. 2? _ LO C A T E D IN A PO R T I O N OF T H E N 11 2OF TH E SE 1 I 4 AN D TH E SW1I 4 OF TH E SE1I 4 OF SE C T I O N 6. TO W N S H I P 9 NO RT H . RA N GE 29EA S T . OF TH E WI L L A M E T I ' E ME R I D I A N . CI T Y OF PA S C O. F R A N K L I NCO U N T Y . WA S H I N G T O N . NA R R A T I V E : TH I S PR O J E C T WA S PE I F O R M E D RE Q U ES T OFBA R K E R TE S T A M E N T A R Y TR U S T AN D BE T H L E H E M EV A N G E I J C A L LU T H E RA N CH UR CHOFKE N N E W I C K T O SU B D I V I D E TH O S E LA N D KN O W N AS TA X PA R C E L 11 8 1 8 0 0 7 3 . AD D R ES S OF 71 2 8 IR I S LA N E . PA S C O . WA S H I N G T O N LO C A T E D NO R T H OF BU R N S RO A D 5 WE S T E R L Y OF BR OA DM OO R BO U L E V AR D INFR A N K L I N CO U N I ‘ I . WA S H I N G T O N . TH I S SU R V E Y WA S PE R F O R M E D AS A R E A L TI M EKI N E M A 'I T C SU R V E Y US I N G DU A L FR E Q U c h TR I M B L E R8 GP S RE C E I V E R S HA V I N G AN AC CU RA CY OFON E CE N T T M E I E R 14 - 1PP M . TH E MO N U M E N T S SH O W N AS FO U N D HE R E U P O N W ER E A LL VI SI TE DBE T W E E N JU N E . 29 1 5 AN D FE B R U A R Y . 20 2 0 . PL A T CE R T I F I C A T E RE F ER E NC E : AL L T I ' I ' L E IN F O R M A T I O N SH O W N T H ISMA P HA S BE E N EX T R A C T E D FR O M IN F O R M A T I O N CO N T A I N E D IN TI C O R TI T L E CO M P AN Y AL TACO M M I T ME N T FO R TI T L E IN S U R A N C E , CO M M I T M E N T NO . 47 1 9 0 8 9 5 2 . DA T E D MA R C H 17 . 20 2 0 8:00 A M. INPR E P A R I N G TH I S SH O R T PL A T . PB S EN G I N E E R I N G AN D EN V I R O N M E N T A L HA S CO N D UC T E D NO IN D E P E N DE N T TI T L E SE A R C H . NO R ISPB S EN G I N E E R I N G AN D EN V I R O N M E NT A L A W A R EOFAN Y TI T T . E IS S U E S AF F E C T T N G TH E PR O P E R T Y OT H E R TH A N TH O S E SH O W N ON T H E S H O RTPL A T AN D DI S C L O S E D BY T H E RE F E R E N C E D TI C O R TI T L E CO M P A N Y AL T A CO M M I T M EN T F O RTT T L E IN S U R A N C E .PB S EN G I N E E R I N G AN D EN V I R O N M E N T A L HA S RE L I E D WH OL L Y ON TH E TI C O R TT I ' L E CO M P A N Y AL T A CO M M I T M E N T FO R TT T L E IN S U R A N C E RE P R E S E N T A T TO N O F' IH ETI T L E ‘ S CO N D I T I O N TOPR E P A R E TH I S MA P AN D TH E R E F O R E PB S EN G I N E E R I N G A N D E N VI R O N M E N T A LOU A I J FI E S TT - I E MA P ' S AC C U R A C Y AN D CO M P L E I ' E N E S S TO TH A T EX T E N T. CI T Y OF PA S C O RE Q U I R ED S H O R TPL A T NO T E S : AL L IM P R O V E M E N T S SH A L L I NACCO RD AN CE TOTH E PA S C O MU N I C I P A L CO D E . TH E PA S O O MU N I C I P A L CO D E AD O P ‘ I ' S T H E C I T YOF PA S C O ST A N D A R D SP E C I F I C A T I O N S . TH E WA S H I N G T O N ST A T E DE P A R T M E N T OF TR A NS P OR T AT I ON ST A N D A R D SP E C I F I C A T I O N S FO R RO A D , BR I D G E S . AN D MU N I C I P A L CO N S T R U CT I O N . TH EIN T E R N AT I O N A LBU I L D I N G CO D E . AN D TH E IN T E R N A T I O N A L FI R E CO D E . TAR E AN Y CO N F L I C T T N G RE G U L A T I O N S INAN Y OF TH E S E DO C U M E N T S . TH E MO R E ST R IN G EN T RE G U L AT I O N SH A L L AP P L Y . 2. AL L PU B L I C IN F R A S T R U C T UR E ISH A L L BEDE S I G N E D BY A WA S H I N G T O N ST A T E RE G I S T E R E D EN G I N E E R AN D INAC C O R D A N C E WI T H AL L AP P L I C A B L E CI T Y . ST A T E AN D FE D E R A L CO D E S. AN D RE G U L A T I O N S . 3. FU R T H E R SU B D I V I S I O N OF A N Y L O TORPA R C E L .ASDE L I N E A T E D WI T H I N TH I S SH O R T PL A T . WI L L RE S U L T IN TH E RE Q U I R EM E N T FO R T HEAD D T I I O N A L DE D I C A T I O N OFRI G H T - O F - W A Y FO R PR O P E R AC C E S S AN D CO N N EC T I VI T Y PE R TH E RE C O M M E N D E DIM P R O V E M E N T S OF TH E TR A N S P O R T A T I O N SY S T E M PL A N (2 0 2 0 ) AN D TH E PL A N N E D I A D O P T E D CA 2 0 1 9 - 0 1 3 ST R E E T CO N N E C T I V I T Y CO D E 4. AL L RI G H T - O F - W A Y IM P R O V EM E N T S SH A L L ME E T TH E LA T E S T RE Q U I R E M E N T S ASDE F I N E D IN PA S C O MU N I C I P A L CO D E AN D DE S I GNAN D CO N S T R U C T T O N ST A N D A R D S AN D SP E C I F I C A T I O N S FO R PU B L I C IM P R O V EM E N T S ASAP P R O V E D BYTH E CI T Y EN G I N E E R . 5. AL L ON S I T E IM P R O V H A E N TS ME H TH E LA T E S T IN T E R N A T T O N A L BU I L D I N G CO D E (I B C ) AN D TH E IN T E R N A T I O N A L FI RE C O D E(I F S ) . IFTH E R E AR E AN Y CO N F L I C T I N G RE G U L A T T O N S . TH E MO S T ST R I N G E N T SH A LL WH I T E BA H E R T R U S T PR N E C T N Q : m PB S mm an d Wm m n m - SU R V E Y I R : "2 “ . m e DA T E ' mm 40 0 Br a d l e y Bl v d . St a 1 0 8 WM A 99 3 5 1 mo a n mu DR A W N av : nw w so m e : m 50 9 . 8 4 2 . 1 8 0 0 SE C T I O N : onmw m n r ; un n u m RA N G E ' ma m ph l u a m ar m PA B O O ow n - m mm wa r ; as ; 2. 5 8 a mu s e u m Iz o m m o n Hm m o m Si g n » an u s — 3 3 H ES E m no u Hu m a n mm Hu g u e s Ea 35 H 0N O N \ H a \ m o v? u u o o m m rm m m u m ? .E .4 3 .q u — o u :u n A u E m u h £9 5 2 3 £5 3 3 5 yu m : Pa g e 7 2 o f 1 6 6 AF N TI 19 1 8 9 5 7 Re c o r d e d 08 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 0 10 : 4 0 AM Do c T y p e : 6P Pa g e : 5 of 5 Fi l i n g In s t r u m e n t $2 0 7 . 5 0 13 0 8 3 1 DO B S O N - RE T T E R & CO M P A N Y Fr a n k l i n Co u n t y , WA . Am le d l u cu , In ne w AF N I I I I B S W S P mm m w u m 5 PM ! ) In : Bu m . Ma t t Be a t e n , Au d i t o r , LE G A L DE S C R I P T I O N : LE G A L DE S C R I P T I O N OF RE C O R D PE R OU I T C L A I M DE E D A S RE C O R D E D UN D E R AU D I T O R 8 FI L E NO . 17 5 4 5 9 . RE C O R D S OF FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y . WA S H I N G T O N : TH E NO R T H HA L F OF T H E SO U T H E A S T QU A R T E R AN D TH E SO U T H W E S T QU A R T E R OF TH E SO U T H E A S T QU A R T E R OF SE C T I O N 6 IN TO W N S H I P 9 NO R T H . RA N G E 3 EA S T OF TH E WI L L A M E T T E ME R I D I A N . FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y , WA S H I N G T O N BE I N G FA R M UN I T 99 . TH I R D RE V I S I O N . IR R I G A T I O N BL O C K 1. CO L U M B I A BA S I N PR O J E C T . WA S H I N G T O N . AC C O R D I N G TO TH E PL A T T H E R E O F RE C O R D E D IN VO L U M E C OF FL A T S . PA G E 83 . FR A N K I J N CO U N T Y . WA S H I N G T O N EX C E P T I N G TH E R E F R O M : AL L T H A T PO R ' I T O N OF TH E HE R E I N A I - ‘ I ' E R DE S C R I B E D TR A C ’ T ' X ‘ LY I N G BE T W E E N TH E FO L L O W I N G DE S C R I B E D LI N E S 1 M0 7 ; LI N E 1: BE G I N N I N G AT TH E SO L T T H 1\ 4 CO R N E ! OF SE C T I O N 6, TO W N S H I P 9 NO R T H . RA N G E 29 EA S T . WI L L A M E T T E ME R I D I A N AN D A PO I N T OP P O S T I ‘ E CO U N T Y EN G I N E E R ' S ST A T I O N (H E R E I N A F T E R RE F E R R E D TO AS CE S ) D 63 % 39 . 5 3 AN D 40 . 0 0 FE E T SO U T H E R L Y TH E R E F R O M ; TH E N C E EA S T E R L Y AL O N G TH E SO U T H E R L Y LI N E OF TH E SO U T H E A S T 1I 4 OF SA I D SE C T I O N 6 1. 3 2 7 3 8 FE E T TO A PO I N T OP P O S T T E CE S D 7W .1 S A N D 40 . 0 0 FE T SO U T H E R L Y TH E R E F R O M AN D TH E EN D OF TH I S LI N E DE S C R I P T I O N . LE N G T H E N I N G AN D SH O R T E N I N G SA I D LI N E 1 30 AS TO TE R M I N A T E ON TH E SO U N D S OF HE R E I N A F T E R DE S C R I B E D WT 'X ' . LI N E 2: BE G I N N I N G AT A PO I N T OF P O S T T E CO U N T Y EN G I N E R ' B ST A ' I T O N (H E R E I N A F I ' E R RE F E R R E D T O A S CE B ) 06 3 4 4 1 . 5 8 OF DE N T RO A D EX T E N S I O N AN D 40 . 0 0 FE E T NO R T H E R L Y TH E R E F R O M ; TH E N C E EA S T E R L V AL O N G A LI N E PA R A L L E L WI T H TH E CE N T E R UN E OF SA I D DE N T RO A D BC T E N S I O N 1, 3 2 7 . 8 6 FE E T T O A PO I N T OP P O S I T E 05 5 D 76 0 6 9 . 4 3 AN D 40 . 0 0 FE E T NO R T H E R L V TH E R E F R O M AN D TH E EN D OF TH I S LI N E DE S C R I P T I O N . LE N G T H E N I N G AN D SH O R T E N I N G SA I D LI N E 2 SO AS TO TE I M I N A T E ON TH E SO U N D S OF HE R E I N A F I ’ E R D- C R I B E D T R A C T ' X ' . TR A C T ' X ' FA R M UN I T 89 . IR R I G A T I O N BL O C K 1. 3R D RE V I S I O N CO L U M B I A BA S I N PR O J E C T RE C O R D E D lN VO L U M E C OF FA R M UN I T FL A T S , PA G E 83 , RE C O R D S OF FR A N I C J N CO U N T Y . WA S H I N G T O N . TT ' I E LA N D S HE R E I N DE S C R I B E D CO N T A I N AN AR E A OF 2. 4 4 AC R E S , MO R E OR LE S S . TH E SP E C I F I C DE T A I L S CO N C E R N I N G AL L OF WH I C H AR E TO BE FO U N D IN TH E CE R T A I N MA P OF DE F I N I ' T E LO C A T I O N TT T L E D RO A D 1D O I D E N T RO A D BT T E N S I O N — MP 58 3 . NO W OF RE C O R D AN D ON FI L E IN TH E OF F I C E OF TH E FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y PU B L I C WO R K S DE P A R T M E N T . AU D I T O R ' S CE R T I F I C A T E FI L E D FO R RE C O R D WI T H TH E FR A N K I J N CO U N T Y AU D I T O R S OF F I C E TH I s I[I I I DA Y OF (W o w / L IN VO L U M E L or SH O R T FL A T S AT PA G E . a M FR A N K I J N CO U N T Y AU N T T O R IN D E X ND . q .1 KU N CO U N T Y AU D I T O R AT TH E RE Q U E S T OF PB S EN G I N E E R ! DE D I C A T I O N WE . TH E UN D E R S I G N E D . HE R E B V C E R T I F Y ‘ I H A T W E A R E T H E OW N E T S OF TH E TR A G T O F L A N D DE S C R I B E D HR E O N ; HA V E WT T H ,T — O U R FR E E CO N S E N T AN D IN AC C O R D A N C E WT T H OU R DE S I R E S CA U S E D TH E SA I D TO BE SU R V E Y E D AN D SH O R ‘ n F l A T T E D AS SH O W N HE R E O N : DO HE R E B Y DE D I C A T E TH O S E ST R E E T S AN D / O R RO A D RI G H T S - O F - WA Y SH O W N HE R E O N TO TH E US E OF TH E PU B L I C ; AN D DO HE R E B Y ED I C A T E TH E EA S E M E N T S AS SH O W N HE R E O N FO R TH E US E S IN DI C A T E D . / ’x / JE F . DA T E C ' E DV D - I E BA R K E R TE S T A M E N T A R Y TR U S T EI R AN D DE V I S E E OF JO Y C E GE R T R U D E BA R K E R . WH O AL S O AP P E A R S AS JO Y C E EL E A N O R BA R K E R . DE C E A S E D . I a Al l ,\ 1/ I m :1 0 FR A N C I S BA R K E R — 1 DA T E / CD T R U S T E E OF TH E BA R K E R T E S T A M B I T A R Y TR U S T 7” Ca m ’ w ‘ e e 'v / M 5m m PA M E L A JE A N B IL E S I DA ”T R U S T E E OF TH E BA R K E R TE S T A M E N T A R Y TR U S T - “‘ — — ar s e 6 ”2 " .l A. BR O O K S /J DA T E AN D DE V I S E E OF JO Y C E GE R T R U D E ' BA R K E R WH O AL S O AP P E A R S A8 JO Y C E EL E A N O R ”m (Q I IR A — 4 . , é zé 7, 0 BR U C E S C H R O E R DA T E FR E S I O E N T I R E P R E S E N T A ‘ I T V E CF BE T H L E H E M EV A N G E L I C A L LU T H E T A N CH U R C H OF KE N N E W I C K . WH I C H AC Q U I R E D TI T L E AB BE H? E M LU T H E R A N CH U R C H . IG N N E W I C K W A S H I N G T O N . BO B S I K DO B S O N AC K N O W L E D G M E N T ? NO T A R Y PU B L I C ST A T E OF WA S H I N G T O N ST A T E OF CO M M I S S I O N EX P I R E S \\ \ JU L Y 29 . 20 2 1 CO U N T Y OF I CE R T I F Y T H A T I KN O W OR HA V E S A \ _ TI S F W R Y EV I D E N C E TH A T JE F F R E Y C . BA R K E R . CD - TR U S T E E OF TH E BA R K E R TE S T A M E N T A R Y TR U S T AN D HE I R AN D DE V I S E E OF JO Y C E GE R T ' R U D E BA R K E R . WH O AL S O AP P E A R S AS JO Y C E EL E A N O R . BA R K E R . DE C E A S E D , HA S SI G N E D TH I S SH O R T PL A T , ON OA T H ST A T E D TH A T T H E Y AR E AU T H O R I Z E D .T O BE C U T E TH I S SH O R T FL A T AN D AC K N O W L E D G E D TT AS TH E I R FR E E A N D VO L U N T A R Y A C T OF SU C H PA R T Y FO R TH E US E S AN D PU R P O S E S ME N T T O N E D ON IS SH O R T PL A T . n H IL MY A P P O I N T M E N T E X P I R E S :? . 7& V I—RE S I D I NM N AR Y PU B L I C II BO B B I K DO B B O N NO T A R Y PU B L I C AC K N O W L E D G M E N T ST A T E OF WA S H I N G T O N - CO M M I S S I O N EX P I R E S ST A T E or JU L Y 29 . 20 2 1 CO U N T Y OF I CE R ' I T F Y TH A T I KN O W OR HA V E 8% ? ” EV I D E N C E TH A T FR A N C I S BA R K E R . CO — T R U S T E E OF T H E BA R K E R TE S T A M E N T A R Y / TR U S T HA 8 SI G N E D TH I S SH O R T PL A T . ON OA T H ST A T E D TH A T TH E Y A R E A U T H O R I Z E D TO EX E C U T E TH I S SH O R T I P L A T AN D AO K N O W L E D G E D IT A S TH E I R FR E E AN D VO L U N T A R Y A C ' T OF SU C H PA R T Y FO R TH E I U S E S AN D PU R P O S E S ME N T I O N E D ON TH I S SH O R T \\ . N I I AR Y PU B L I C DA T E MY A F P O I N T ' M E N ‘ T SP I R E S 1- _ & i . . - & - ' ’ .R E S I D I N G // ,B Q B B I K DO B s O N NO T A R L E U E L I C .s - r n e o a m s u m em u AN D ”2 ° AT CO M M I S S I O N WI R E S _J U L Y _ 2 § L 20 2 1 SH O RT FL A T 0.20 2 0 - 12 . LO C A T E D IAPO R T IO N OF TH E N11 2 OF TH E SE1/ 4AN D TH E SW1/ 4OF TH E SE1/ 4 OF SE C T I O N T O W N S H IP9NO R T H . RA N G E 29EA S T . OF TH E WI L L A M E T T E ME R I D I A N . CI T Y OF PA S C O . FR A N K L I N CO U N T Y . WA S H I N G T O N . BO B B I KDO B S O N AC KN OW LE D GM EN T NO T A R Y PU B L I C ST A T E O F aMST A T E orWA S H I N G T O N CO M M I S S I O N EX P I R E S CO U N T Y JU L Y 29 . 20 2 1 I CE R T I F Y IKN O W ORHA V E SA ' I T S F A C T O R Y EV I D E N C E TH A T PA M E U T JE A N BO B I L E S . (J O - TR U S T E E OF TH E BA R K E R TE S T A M E N T A R Y TR U S T HA 8 SI G N E D TH I S SH O R T PL A T . ONOA T H ST A T E D 'TH E YA R EAU T H O R I Z E D TOEX E C U T E TH I S SH O R T PL A T AN D AC K N O W L E D G E D ITAS TH E I R F R E E AN DVO L U N TA R Y AC T OFSU C H PA R T Y FO R TH E US E S AN D PU R P O S E S ME N T I O N E D ON T SH OR T PL AT . _ -V— N TA R Y DA MY A P P OI N T M E NT WI RE SW JE SI UI NG BO B B I KDO B S O N NO T A R Y PU B L I C ' AC K N O DG M' EN T ST A T E OFWA S H I N G T O N ST A T E O F CO M M I S S I O N EX P I R E S JU L Y 29 . 20 2 1 CO UN TY OF IK I Ii ? l | CE R T I FY TIKN O W ORHA V E SA T I S F A C T O R Y EV I D E N C E TH A T JU L I E A.BR O O K S . HE I R AN D DE V I S E E JO Y CEGE R T R U D E BA R K E R . WH O AL S O AP P E A R S AS JO Y C E EL E A N O R BA R K E R . DE C E AS E D . HA 8SI G N E D TH I S SH O R T PL A T . ONOA T H ST A T E D TH A T TH E Y AR E AU T H O R I Z E D TO EX E C U TE TSH O R TPL A T AN D AC K N O W L E D G E D TTASTH E I R FR E E AN D VO L U N T A R Y AC T OF SU C H P FTH EUS E S PU R P O S E S ME N T T O N E D ON TH I S SH O R T PL A T . -25 2 0 . 7 0 N TA R YP U SL I C A BO B B I KDO D S O N NO T A R Y PU B L I C AC K NO ED GM EN su m : OFWA S H I N G T O N CO M M I S S I O N EX P I R E S ST A T E JU L Y 29 . 20 2 1 CO U N T YI CE R ‘ IT F Y T H A TIKN O W ORHA V E SA T I S F A C T O R Y EV I D E N C E TH A T BR U C E SC H R O E R . PR E S I D E N T S DU L Y AU TH OR IZ E) RE P R E S E N TA ' I T V E OF TH E BE T H L E H E M EV A N G E L I C A L LU T H E R A N CH U R C H HA S SI G N E D SH O RTPL A T , ONOA T H ST A T E D TH A T T H E Y AR E AU T H O R I Z E D TOEX E C U T E TH I S SH O R T AC K N O WL E D G EDTT A S TH E I R FR E E AN D VO L U N T A R Y A C T OF SU C H PA R T Y FO R TH E A N DPU R P O SE S EN T T O N E D ON TH I S SH O R T PL A T . DA T E NO AR Y U B LI C MY A P P OI N T M EN T EX P I R E S 2’3 9 3& 2 IRE S I D I N «I n / 1 0 1 . 0 CL I E N T : BA R I T E R T R I J S T PR O J E C T No . 1 mPI S En g l n o o d n g In d Mo m — m l In ;mm ww m sm o e SU R V E Y O R : AL E X D I M A T A R A Z m DA T E 08 1 2 m m MM W A DD W we “ : An n DR A W N B V : wa SC A L E : N/ Amo m z mm sa c r u m : onRA N C E : 23 w pl a n s - n u n cr r v : PA s c o aH E E T i OF _L TO W N S H IP : oiNO R T H WU N T V: FR AN KL I N Pa g e 7 3 o f 1 6 6 %AL 0 PY FRANKLINCOUNTY RECORDING COVER SHEET NAMEAND RETURN ADDRESS: Tippett Company of Washington,LLC PO.Box 3027 Pasco WA 99302-3027 FORM COMPLETEDBY:Ki”Shaffer PHONE #509-521-9133 PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE INFORMATION: DOCUMENTTlTLEtS)(or transaction contained therein) 1,Acceptance of Dedication Deed from Pasco School District-FranklinCo.Resolution No.2021-262 2. 3. GRANTOR(S)(Last name,?rst name.middle name/initials): 1,Pasco School District No.1 2. 3. 4.E]Additional names on page of document GRANTEEtS)(Last name,first name.middle name/initials): 1 ranklin CountyumI:IEIII A C O D ‘Ag?ltional?ames on_page LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Abbreviated:ie.lot.block,plat or section,township.range) Ptn.SP 2016-14 L071 E]Additionallegal is on page of document AUDITOR'S REFERENCE NUMBERtS) 1849367 ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL NUMBER#5430041 [3 Additionalparcel numbers on page of document The Auditor/Recorder willrely on the information provided on this form.The staff willnot read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information EMERGENCYNONSTANDARDREQUEST I am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording for an additionalfee of $50.00 as provided in RCW 36.18.0113.I understand that the recording processing requirements may cover up or otherwise obscure some part of the text of the original document. Signature Date AFN #1956207 DEDIC Recorded 02/14/2022 01:58 PM Page:1 of 5 Filing Instrumen $207.50 Matt Beaton,Auditor,Franklin County,WA.PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT #1 Page 74 of 166 PYUh FRA??$RiQQ§NJ ¥?BEASURERWhenrecordedreturnto:mmama QTOQEHFE P.O.Box 2368 i L!22 Pasco,WA 99302 "0meCountyTreasurer DEDICATION DEED THE GRANTOR,PASCO SCHOOLDISTRICTNO.1,a Washington municipal corporation,for and in consideration of creating access to the Grantors property,for the public use.and as a public right-of—way.and other mutual benefits to the parties hereto and pursuant to ROW 36,dedicates.conveys and quit claims to FRANKLINCOUNTY. WASHINGTONa political subdivision of the State of Washington the followingdescribed Arealestate,suuatedIntheCountyofFranklinStateofWashingtontogetherWithallafter DVi“'IIII=|I=|III PM;DUacquiredtitleofthegrantor(s))therein.V U u Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/AccountNumber:Ptn.115- 180— 042b A PARCEL OF LANDAFFECTINGLOT 1 OF SHORT PLAT 2016-14 RECORDED IN VOLUME2 OF SHORT PLATS AT PAGES 70,71 AND 72.RECORDS OF FRANKLINCOUNTY,WASHINGTON,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE EASTERLY 40.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 1 LYINGSOUTH OF LOT 2 OF SAID SHORT PLAT ANDTHE EASTERLY 34.10 FEET OF SAID LOT 1 ADJOINiNGTHE EASTERLYLINESAID LOT 2. TOGETHER WITHANDSUBJECT TO EASEMENTS,RESERVATIONS. COVENANTSAND RESTRICTIONSOF RECORD ANDIN VIEW. SEE ATTACHED SKETCH To ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION. DATED:I "SI "902-9» PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.1 DEDICATIONDEED—‘ AFN #1956207 Page:2 of 5 Page 75 of 166 UNOFFW%QW STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )as. County of Franklin ) ? On this 2E day of ??lél?,202}?before me.the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the State of Washing on,duty commissioned and sworn,personally at peared to me known to be the . '~1‘'of PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICTNO.1.the entity that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and votuntary act and deed of PASCO SCHOOLDlSTBrlCTNO.1.for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that 4.was authorized to execute the said instrument.4 GIVENunder my hand and of?cial seal this 3/3-day of (@142(y ,2023’. Printed.a'mef...F\\D(NotaryRublicfin'andortheStatepfWashington/(raidingzat‘n '':1Myféommis'sionexpires?"— / TERRY L KNEBLIK Notary Public State of Washington License Number 190562 My Commission Expires February 15,2025 DEDICATIONDEED-2 AFN #1956207 Page:3 of 5 Page 76 of 166 THE SW.1/4 OF SEC.06,T.09N.,R.29E.,WM. FRANKLINCOUNTY.WASHINGTON EXHIBIT SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT2 :SP 2016-14 40'ROAD RIGHT- £77pr“a 3J‘(Wag LOTS -\ SP 2018-14 STRATTON SURVEYING &MAPPING P.C. KCMIIDL WA 99.3.36 (5W)7WD“ Flu:(509}733-5560 n-IIIdIImeW'I 48865K4.DWG N057}? SCALE 1"=400‘ SKETCH FOR PascoSchool District ©2021 DATE:05/21/2021 SHT.1 OF 1 DRAWNBY:AAD JOB # 54.},ROA DRICHT— AFN #1956207 Page:4 of 5 Page 77 of 166 UV Attest Member ClerkgtheBoard FRANKLIN COUNTY RESOLUTION NO.2 0 2 1 -2 6 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY,WASHINGTON ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICA TION DEED FROM THE PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICTNO.1 (FOR FUTURE ROAD 108,NORTH OF BURNS ROAD). WHEREAS,the Pasco School District No.l desiresto transfer to FranklinCounty,approximately 2.34 acres.for future Road 108 shown on Short Plat 2016-14 recorded August 12"“,2016 Auditor‘sFile Number ”349367;and WHEREAS,there is preliminary planning of adjoining land for subdivisionthat will result in the constructionof the east half of future Road 108,north of Burns Road;and WHEREAS,development of adjoining land that is currently in the preliminaryplanning for subdivision that will result in the construction of a portion Road 108.north of Bums Road prompted the Pasco School District No.l to deed right of way to FranklinCounty;and WHEREAS,the Pasco School District No.1 understands that the development of parce1(s)lying on the west half of ?lrure Road 108,and with the dedicationfor future Road 208 does not waive the requiremenh’coslsof constructionof the west half of ?xtureRoad 108 with any future development;and WHEREAS,the Pasco School District N 0.1 has by subsequent DedicationDeedbroadenedthe interestconveyedtoFranklin County for use and bene?t ofthe generalpublicasa publicrighi-of-wayrandn AD\ll //\\II II II ////\\WHEREAS,FranklinCounty‘desrresto"accepttheDedicationlll3eedfromthePascoSchool DistrictNo.1forthe use MD bene?tof‘thegeneralpublicas a publicright-ofway;and ll Uu\Y/u u H 11:.\J 11 NOW,THEREFORE.BE IT RESOLVEDthattheBoardofFranklin County Commissioners hereby approve the DedicationDeed from the Pasco School DistrictNo.1,a reviewed and acceptedcopy of the dedication deed is attached for ?imre reference. APPROVED this 16'“day of November 2021 B .DOF CO YCOMMISSIONE—RS F A.,N ,SHlNG’I‘ON k ~..‘ C 215Pro Tem —_,_...._1__t_._...__.__.".-‘_v..a.__.,.._..__.l.._. AFN #195620?Page:5 of 5 Page 78 of 166 Page 79 of 166 Page 80 of 166 Pa g e 8 1 o f 1 6 6 Pa g e 8 2 o f 1 6 6 0 —, C191?Community &Economic Development Department Fee:' 3POBox293,525 N 3"Ave,Pasco,WA 99301 P:509.545.3441 /F:509.545.3499 CITYOF PASCO STREET/ALLEYVACATION PETITION INITIATION:A vacation may be initiated by: A.A Resolution of the City Council,-or B.A petition signed by the owners of more than two-thirds of the property abutting the part of the street or alley to be vacated,or,in the case of an easement,the owners of two—thirdsof the property underlying the portion of the easement to be vacated. REQUIREMENTS:An applicant shall apply for a vacation by submitting the following: 1.A vacation petition upon forms provided by the City; 2.A professional survey of the property proposed forvacationwithinthe boundaries of the proposed vacation marked upon the ground withan accuratelegal description of the proposed vacation to be furnishedto the City. . 3.For each petitioner a title report indicating ownership and providing a legal description of the property owned by the petitioner unless waived; The vacation application fee; A signed agreement to pay the cost of an appraisal; 6.Any additional information or material that the Director of Community 8:Economic Development determines is reasonably-necessary for the City Councilto consider the requested vacation. 9"? PUBLICHEARING:Upon receiving a complete application for vacation,or upon passage of a Resolution by the City Council seeking vacation,the City Council shall by Resolution,fix a time when the City will hold a public hearing on the proposed vacation.The hearing will be not more than sixty (60)days nor less than twenty (20)days afterthe date of the passage of such Resolution.The Resolution seeking vacation by the City Council and setting the public hearingmay be consolidated to a single Resolution. NOTICEOF HEARING:On passage of the Resolution,the City shall give notice 'at least twenty (20)days before the public hearing of the time,date and place for the public hearing. OBJECTION:lf ?fty percent (50%)or more of the abutting property owners on the street or alley (based on front footage),or the underlying public easement (based on square footage),file written objections to the City Council in opposition to the vacation prior to the time of or at the hearing,the City shall be prohibited from proceeding with the public hearing or granting the vacation. Updated April 2019 $30 Page 83 of 166 CRITERIA:The City Council shall use the following criteria for approval of the petition: A.The vacation shall not adversely affect traffic accessibility and circulationwithin the immediate area or within the City as a whole; The right-of-way is not contemplated or needed for future public use;B. C.No abutting property will become landlocked,or its access substantiallyimpaired;and D.The public needs shall not be adversely affected and the vacationwill provide a public benefit or serve a public purpose. RESERVEEASEMENTS:In vacating a street,alley,or public easement,the City may reserve for the City any easements or other rights to exercise and grant any easement forpublic utilities and services, pedestrian trail purposes,and any other type of easement relating tothe City's right to control,use and manage its rights-of way. COMPENSATION:The City Councilmay require the petitioners to compensate the City: 1.Where the street or alley,or access easement,has been part of a dedicated public right-of-way for 25 years or more,or was acquired at public expense,in an amount that does not exceed the full appraised value of the area vacated. 2.Where the street or alley,or access easement,has not been part of a dedicated right-of-way for 25 years or more,or was acquired at public expense,in an amount which equals one-half of the appraised value of the area vacated. Compensation for the vacated areas and an appraisal and title report may be waived in whole or in part by the City if one or more of the following apply: 1.The vacation is initiated by the City Council by Resolution; 2.The vacation is at the request of the City; 3.The right-of-way to be vacated was previously determined by the City Council not to be essential to public traffic circulation and available for vacation; 4.The grant of substitute public right-of—waywhich has a value as a right-of-way at least equal to that right-of-way to be vacated;and 5.The resulting bene?t to the community of the project requiring the vacation outweighs the appraised value of the right-of-way to be vacated. ORDINANCE:Following the public hearing thereon,the City Council may authorize by Ordinance the vacation of such street,alley,access easement,or any part thereof.Such Ordinance may provide for the retention by the City of all easements or rights with respect to the vacated land for the construction,repair or maintenance of public utilities and services.if the City Council determines that compensation shall be paid as a condition of the vacation,the Ordinance shall not become effective, published or recorded until the compensation has been paid in full. Page 84 of 166 WA Master File#Date Submitted: We the undersigned,owners of two-thirds of the privately—owned abutting property,hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the following described street/alley rights-of—way: FN 5‘!Road l0? CITYOF PASCO VACATION PETITIO Qty!Community &Economic Development Department Fee:$300 PO Box 293,525 N 3-'=‘Ave,Pasco,WA 99301 P:509.545.3441 /F:509.545.3499 Name:Tm Address:“5601?Lakef-{MQUICK Applicant]Phone:50?.3'37,”655Ownerl Email:TRYQMMMQhOM‘S-(Gh. Signature:3/JW Name:S'H‘ilh?'csHM?“RanchLLC Address:(0590‘!E WiserF M kftmebit kOwner2Phone:50?-3172-7680 Signature: (Please see reverse side) Updated April 2019 Page 85 of 166 Name:D“(/0 Address:15310 Mia‘lkwo‘Lam,Umi’r0C Pugh/'64 Owners Phone:601;}!.usgq Email: Coo rep «9‘.COM Signaturel/ El Survey D Title Report I:Fee of $300 (if not waived) Page 86 of 166 Pasco City Council August 3, 2026 Regular Meeting Pa g e 8 7 o f 1 6 6 Resolution Setting Time and Date for a Right-of-Way Vacation Public Hearing Portion of Road 108-VAC2026- 002August3,2026 Pasco City Council Pa g e 8 8 o f 1 6 6 01 History 02 PMC 03 Vicinity Map 04 Realignment Pa g e 8 9 o f 1 6 6 HISTORY 2022 February-PSD Dedicates Westerly 34.1 Feet to County May-City Annexes Westerly 34.1 Feet 2021 Barker Ranch 1st Addition Preliminary Plat Approval 2020 City Short Plat Dedicates Easterly 30 Feet To City Pa g e 9 0 o f 1 6 6 VAC 2026-002 Portion of Road 108 Right-of- Way Vacation PMC 12.40 -Right-of-Way Vacations This right-of-way vacation was initiated by a petition signed by the owners of more than two-thirds of the property abutting the area proposed for vacation, as authorized by PMC 12.40. Public Hearing –Tuesday, September 8, 2026, at 7:00 PM Once a complete petition for vacation is received, the City Council must adopt a resolution setting the date and time for a publichearing. The public hearing must be held no less than 20 days and no more than 60 days after adoption of the resolution. Although the City Council may also initiate a right-of-way vacation by resolution, this request was initiated by the adjoining property owners. Therefore, the purpose of this resolution is to establish the required public hearing date. City Council Vacation Approval Criteria The City Council considers the following when reviewing a vacation petition: 1.Traffic CirculationThe vacation must not negatively impact traffic accessibility or circulation in the area or the City as a whole. 2.Future Public UseThe right-of-way must not be planned or needed for future public purposes. 3.Property AccessNo adjacent property should become landlocked or experience significantly reduced access as a result of the vacation. 4.Public InterestThe vacation must not harm public needs and should offer a public benefit or serve a public purpose. Pa g e 9 1 o f 1 6 6 Pa g e 9 2 o f 1 6 6 Pa g e 9 3 o f 1 6 6 Questions? Thank you! Pa g e 9 4 o f 1 6 6 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 6, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 8/3/26 FROM: Kevin Hebdon, Finance Director Finance SUBJECT: Resolutions No. 4773 - Segregation of Local Improvement District No. 152 Assessment (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Resolution 4773 with Exhibit II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: to relating 4773, No. I approve to move Local Resolution Improvement District No. 152; providing for the segregation of assessments for certain parcels, referred to as J-14 LLC, consistent with RCW 35.44.410. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Segregation of parcels will ensure further collection of revenues to meet the City's debt obligations on the bonds used to fund the projects under LID 152. No additional funding it needed and budgeted appropriations are adequate to meet these obligations. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background On March 23, 2022, Council adopted Ordinance No. 4592 establishing Local Improvement financing sewer purpose the of 152 No. (LID) District for infrastructure improvements within the East Urban Growth Area, including installation of sewer mains and construction of a lift station. To provide interim project 4704 financing, Council later adopted Ordinance No. authorizing issuance of a Bond Anticipation Note (BAN), a short-term financing mechanism used until permanent long-term bonds are issued. The City subsequently received $20.06 million in BAN proceeds on March 14, 2024. Construction of the improvements was completed in multiple phases, with Council accepting the final phase on November 18, 2024. Final project costs Page 95 of 166 were lower than projected, leaving an available balance of $318,934 to be applied toward repayment of the BAN. Additionally, because the project created excess sewer capacity benefiting the broader system, the City contributed $5.76 million toward project costs. Following completion of the project, Council adopted Ordinance No. 4762 on March 3, 2025, confirming the final LID assessment roll and establishing a 30- day interest-free prepayment period. The prepayment period concluded on May 2, 2025, during which approximately $1.16 million in assessments was prepaid by property owners. The remaining balance of $12.68 million is required to be financed through issuance of long-term LID bonds. To facilitate the permanent financing, Council adopted Ordinance No. 4776 on June 16, 2025, authorizing issuance of up to $12,678,905.87 in LID bonds, establishing key financing parameters and assessment interest rates, and appointing the City’s designated representative to approve final bond sale terms in advance of repayment of the BAN due September 1, 2025. Impact (other than fiscal) The project completed under LID No. 152 provides long-term community benefits by expanding sewer infrastructure capacity and improving service readiness in the East Urban Growth Area. This investment supports future development, enhances infrastructure resilience, and contributes to the City’s ability to meet the needs of a growing population. V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation Since final approval of the LID No. 152 assessment roll, property boundaries and ownership have changed due to subdivision. The action set forth in this resolution is necessary to align the outstanding Local Improvement District assessment with the amended parcels and ensure compliance with state law, which requires Council approval of LID assessment segregation following subdivision. Council is responsible for determining that reassigned assessments are apportioned as nearly as practicable on the same basis as originally levied, and that the total segregated amount equals the original assessment prior to segregation. Staff is recommending Council's approval of the segregation of all parcels associated with J-14 LLC in LID No. 152, effective as of August 3, 2026. Next Steps If approved by Council, staff will process the segregation of the parcels in J-14 LLC within the LID No. 152 assessment and update the assessment records to reflect the newly apportioned amounts for each affected parcel as set forth in Page 96 of 166 Exhibits A. The revised assessment information will be recorded with the County Auditor to ensure proper lien administration and future billing. Alternatives Further discussion and approval at a future date. Page 97 of 166 Resolution - LID No. 152 Segregation J-14 LLC RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 152; PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN PARCEL, FOR SEGREATION OF THE ASSESSMENT KNOWN AS J-14 LLC, CONSISTENT WITH RCW 35.44.410. WHEREAS, on March No. 23, 2022, the City Council duly adopted Ordinance 4592 establishing Local Improvement District (LID) No. 152 to finance the acquisition, construction, and installation of sewer infrastructure improvements, including sewer mains and a lift station, within the East Urban Growth Area; and WHEREAS, on March 3, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 4762 confirming the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 152 and establishing the final assessments for properties within the district; and WHEREAS, the City Council has since taken related actions through Ordinance No. 4704, Ordinance No. 4762, and Ordinance No. 4776 to facilitate interim financing, confirm the final assessment roll, and authorize long-term financing of the improvements; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the final assessment roll confirmation, a number of properties within the LID have been subdivided through final plat approval; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.44.410 provides that whenever land against which there has been levied a special assessment has been sold in part or subdivided, the legislative authority of that City has the power to order a segregation of the assessment; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that assessments against the subdivided parcels may be assessed as nearly as possible on the same basis as the original assessments were levied, and amo the assessment equals assessment the parts segregated the of the total of before unts segregation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the assessment established on March 3, 2025, against Tax Parcel No. 114330031 in the amount of ($2,324,874.46) be segregated into eight (8) separate assessments against the eight (8) newly created tax parcels as shown on Exhibit A, and Be It Further Resolved, that City staff is directed to implement this Resolution and take all actions necessary and appropriate to segregate the assessments, including recording of this Resolution, as detailed in Exhibits A, and Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution shall take effect immediately. Page 98 of 166 Resolution - LID No. 152 Segregation J-14 LLC PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this 3rd day of August, 2026. Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Gabriela Sanchez Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Page 99 of 166 Parcel # Acreage Assessment Assessment 2,324,871.46$ 114330031 158.15 2,324,871.46 Difference -$ Acreage 158.15$ 158.15 2,324,871.46 Difference (right of way)-$ Property Description Lot # LID Acct # Parcel # Net Acreage Assessment J-14 LLC N/A 152-000-137 114330317 20.47 300,883.08$ J-14 LLC N/A 152-000-138 114330318 21.77 320,066.40$ J-14 LLC N/A 152-000-139 114330319 20.91 307,375.90$ J-14 LLC N/A 152-000-140 114330032 13.99 205,704.27$ J-14 LLC N/A 152-000-141 114330033 19.79 290,996.29$ J-14 LLC N/A 152-000-142 114330034 20.16 296,308.59$ J-14 LLC N/A 152-000-143 114330035 20.12 295,718.34$ J-14 LLC N/A 152-000-144 114330036 20.94 307,818.59$ Totals 158.15 2,324,871.46 Exhibit A LID 152 Parcel # 114330031 (J-14 LLC) into 8 Separate Parcels Final Assessment Role Segregated Page 100 of 166 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 8/3/26 FROM: Drew Pollom, Deputy City Manager City Attorney SUBJECT: Cannabis – Affirmative Consent to Compas LLC Social Equity Retail License and Letter of Support I. ATTACHMENT(S): Notice of Cannabis License Application Letter Requesting City Support From Compas LLC II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to authorize the City Manager to execute and submit the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board Local Authority Notice indicating the No. Application (WSLCB LLC Compas for consent affirmative City's 445257). III. FISCAL IMPACT: by not, do amendment code consent of preparation and Affirmative the themselves, obligate City funds. An additional operating cannabis retailer would increase the City’s share of the State Retail Sales Distribution over time. In Fiscal Year 2025, the City received approximately $41,650 through that distribution from existing four licenses. The applicant’s economic brief projects year-one pre-tax retail sales of $2.4– $3.6 million and 10–15 local jobs at opening, which would generate additional State excise tax and local sales tax revenue attributable to activity within the City. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background On July 27, 2026, during a City Council Workshop, staff presented an overview of City's Washington's cannabis retail licensing framework, the current regulations under PMC 25.10.025, cannabis revenue received by the City, and Page 101 of 166 the policy options available to Council. Following discussion, Council directed staff to increase the City's cannabis retail density limit from four (4) to five (5) licenses and to establish future increases based on a population standard of one (1) license per 30,000 residents. Separately, the City received a formal submission package from Compas LLC (dba Compas Cannabis Company), a locally owned Washington limited liability company owned by Zachary Fairley, providing notice of its pending Equity Social (WSLCB) Board State and Liquor Washington Cannabis cannabis retail license application (Application No. 445257). Compas LLC and WSLCB has requested the City's affirmative consent through the WSLCB Local Authority Notice. Compas' application is filed under the WSLCB Social Equity in Cannabis Program established pursuant to RCW 69.50.335 and implemented through WAC to retail issue the WSLCB program That 314-55-570. authorizes cannabis licenses above the standard population-based local allotment, subject to local input. Under PMC 25.10.025, the City currently maintains a cannabis retail density limit of four (4) licenses (three retail facilities, or four if one is licensed currently through the State's Social Equity Program). All four authorized licenses are in operation. Consistent with Council's July 27, 2026 direction, staff will prepare an ordinance amending PMC 25.10.025 to revise this density limit from four (4) to five (5) licenses, with two (2) licenses authorized through the State's Social Equity Program. The City has received the WSLCB Notice of Cannabis License Application, initiating the statutory 20-day period during which the City may provide its position regarding the application. During that period, the City may (a) affirmatively consent by executing the WSLCB Local Authority Notice; (b) submit a substantiated written objection; or (c) take no action, in which case the WSLCB may proceed at its discretion. City will then receive a business license application and can approve or deny the application based on its local ordinances. Impact (other than fiscal) The proposed use is a continuation of an established cannabis retail use at the same address. Anticipated community impacts are consistent with those of the City's existing cannabis retailers, including land use and zoning considerations and routine public safety and code enforcement coordination. Staff will also prepare and process an ordinance amending PMC 25.10.025 to implement Council's policy direction regarding cannabis retail license density. V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation Page 102 of 166 As directed by Council during its July 27, 2026 Workshop, staff recommends that Council authorize the City Manager to execute and submit the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB) Local Authority Notice indicating the City's affirmative consent for Compas LLC (WSLCB Application No. 445257). Constraints (time or other consideration) The City’s current PMC 25.10.025 density limit of four (4) remains in effect until amended; the code amendment to five (5) should proceed in parallel so the City’s regulations and consent are consistent. The City cannot independently issue cannabis retail licenses; issuance remains subject to WSLCB approval through the Social Equity Program. Next Steps Upon Council approval, the City Manager will execute and submit the WSLCB Local Authority Notice indicating the City's affirmative consent and transmit a separate letter of support on behalf of the City for Compas LLC. Approval of a business license for an additional a social equity license can be done only after the City's ordinance is revised. Staff will prepare an ordinance amending PMC 25.10.025 to revise the cannabis retail license density limit from four (4) to five (5) licenses and establish future increases at one (1) license per 30,000 population. Due to requirements to conduct public hearing and appropriate public notice on this matter, staff anticipates this effort to be complete in two months. Alternative Take no action. If the WSLCB issues a provisional license, the City will have an opportunity to consider increasing the number of licenses for cannabis within the City at that time. Page 103 of 166 June 21, 2026 Eric Ferguson, City Attorney Kerr Law Group c/o City of Pasco 525 N. 3rd Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 eferguson@kerrlawgroup.net cc: Harold Stewart, City Manager — stewarth@pasco-wa.gov Gabriela Sanchez, City Clerk — sanchezg@pasco-wa.gov Mayor Charles Grimm — grimmcouncil@pasco-wa.gov Mayor Pro-Tem David Milne — milnecouncil@pasco-wa.gov Councilmember Mark A. Figueroa — figueroacouncil@pasco-wa.gov Councilmember Leo Perales — peralescouncil@pasco-wa.gov Councilmember Joe Cotta — cottacouncil@pasco-wa.gov Councilmember Calixto Hernandez — hernandezcouncil@pasco-wa.gov Councilmember Abel Campos — camposcouncil@pasco-wa.gov RE: Notice of Pending WSLCB Social Equity Retail License – Compas LLC, WSLCB Application No. 445257, Proposed Location: 5804 Road 90, Suites F&G, Pasco, WA 99301 Dear Mr. Ferguson: I am Zachary Fairley, Owner of Compas LLC, doing business as Compas Cannabis Company ("Compas"), a Washington limited liability company with its principal place of business in Pasco, Washington. I am writing to provide the City of Pasco formal notice of Compas' pending Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board ("WSLCB") Social Equity cannabis retail license application and to request the City's affirmative consent to Compas' proposed location at 5804 Road 90, Suites F&G, Pasco, WA 99301 prior to provisional license issuance. I. WSLCB Application Status Compas holds an active Social Equity retail cannabis license application with the WSLCB under Application No. 445257 (License Tracking No. 6059993280010001). The application was submitted on May 5, 2026, and is currently under active review by WSLCB Licensing Specialist Marcus Mendez (marcus.mendez@lcb.wa.gov; (360) 974-9560). The application is proceeding through the WSLCB's Social Equity multi-part interview process, consistent with the requirements of RCW 69.50.335 and WAC 314-55-570. II. WSLCB Certificate of Location Compliance On May 13, 2026, the WSLCB issued a Certificate of Location Compliance for the proposed licensed premises at 5804 Road 90, Suites F&G, Pasco, WA 99301 (the "Premises"). That certificate confirms that the Premises meet all required distance requirements from restricted entities — including schools, parks, playgrounds, transit centers, libraries, and arcades — as set forth in RCW 69.50.331(8)(a)-(d). A copy of the Certificate is enclosed as Exhibit A. The Premises are located within the Road 90 Business Park (Lot 10, Coles Estates), a commercially zoned multi-tenant property that previously housed Green2Go Recreational, a WSLCB-licensed cannabis retailer that operated at this exact address from July 2023 until Page 104 of 166 recently relocating within Pasco. Three years of incident-free, neighbor-accepted cannabis retail at this address demonstrates that the site and surrounding community are fully compatible with the proposed use. III. Executed Lease Agreement Compas has executed a fully binding Multi-Tenant NNN Lease Agreement with Elite Investment GRP, LLC, as Landlord, for Suites F&G at 5804 Road 90, Pasco, WA 99301. The Lease was executed on May 29, 2026, with a commencement date of July 1, 2026, and a five-year primary term with options to extend. The Lease is personally guaranteed by Pasco-area residents Zachary Fairley, Estevan Garrido, and Moises Serna. Compas has delivered substantial prepaid rent and security deposits reflecting a material and committed financial investment in this location. A copy of the executed Lease is available upon request. IV. Landlord Letter of Support Elite Investment GRP, LLC — the property owner — has submitted a formal letter of support for Compas' application, enclosed as Exhibit B. The Landlord confirms that cannabis retail has operated at Suites F&G since July 2023 without disruption to the business complex, that neighboring tenants have raised no objections, and that licensed cannabis retail security measures have enhanced safety within the building. The Landlord characterizes Compas' proposed operation as a continuation of an already established and accepted use at this location. V. Legal Framework — Social Equity License and City Consent Compas' application is filed under the WSLCB's Social Equity in Cannabis program, established pursuant to RCW 69.50.335 and implemented through WAC 314-55-570. The Social Equity program authorizes the WSLCB to issue retail cannabis licenses above the standard population- based local allotment cap, subject to local consent. Upon issuance of Compas' provisional license, the City of Pasco will enter the statutory 20-day local objection period under RCW 69.50.331(7). During that window, the City may: (a) Affirmatively consent to Compas' operation at the Road 90 location, enabling the WSLCB to finalize the license; (b) File a substantiated written objection with the WSLCB within 20 days, which the WSLCB is required to substantially consider under WAC 314-55-570(e); or (c) Take no action, in which case the WSLCB may proceed at its discretion. Compas respectfully requests that the City affirmatively consent to this application prior to the commencement of the objection window, consistent with the City's 2023 policy decision to permit cannabis retail within commercial and industrial zones. VI. Economic and Community Benefit I was born and raised in the Tri-Cities. Compas is a locally owned business, and every dollar generated stays in this community. Our economic impact analysis — enclosed as Exhibit C — projects annual pre-tax retail sales of $2.4–$3.6 million and the creation of 10–15 local jobs at opening, building on the estimated $23.6 million or more in combined annual pre-tax sales already generated by Pasco's four operating cannabis retailers. Compas' approval as Pasco's sole Social Equity retailer also fulfills the legislative intent of RCW 69.50.335, which was designed to ensure that communities disproportionately impacted by drug enforcement have access to the legal cannabis market. Should the City decline to consent to Page 105 of 166 our Pasco location, WSLCB regulations permit Compas to relocate its Social Equity license to any other jurisdiction within Franklin County — and the economic benefit associated with this license would leave Pasco entirely. In addition to the landlord's letter and our economic analysis, I am pleased to share a letter of support from George Jordan, a Washington State cannabis industry advisor with over ten years of statewide experience, enclosed as Exhibit D. VII. Request for Response I respectfully request a written response from the City indicating its position on this application, and specifically whether the City intends to affirmatively consent to Compas' proposed location prior to provisional license issuance. I am available to meet with City staff, the City Attorney, the City Manager, or any Council member at any time to answer questions or address concerns. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to Compas becoming a responsible, contributing member of Pasco's business community. Respectfully submitted, Zachary Fairley Owner, Compas LLC Compas Cannabis Company zach8124@gmail.com | 707.757.0427 Enclosures: Exhibit A — WSLCB Certificate of Location Compliance (May 13, 2026) Exhibit B — Landlord Letter of Support, Elite Investment GRP, LLC (June 2026) Exhibit C — Compas Cannabis Economic Impact Brief (June 2026) Exhibit D — Letter of Support, George Jordan, PACK Corporation (June 2026) Executed Lease Agreement, 5804 Road 90 Suites F&G — available upon request Page 106 of 166 Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board Licensing Division 1025 Union Ave SE, P.O. Box 43098 Olympia, WA 98504-3098 Customer Service: (360) 664-1600 Fax: (360) 753-2710 \ Website: www.lcb.wa.gov Thank you for visiting the Liquor and Cannabis Board. Our mission is to promote public safety, public health, and trust through fair administration, education, and enforcement of liquor, Certificate of Location Compliance May 13, 2026 COMPAS LLC COMPAS CANNABIS COMPANY 445257 6059993280010001 I have received and reviewed the proposed location address for a cannabis business license at: 5804 ROAD 90, PASCO, WA, 99301, USA Your application was received on [5/5/2026]. The new proposed location for this application was received on [5/12/2026]. The location address you provided appeared to meet the distance requirements from restricted entities (such as parks, schools, and playgrounds, etc.) as outlined in RCW 69.50.331(8)(a)-(d). This letter serves as a certificate of compliance for the proposed location and certifies there are no apparent restricted entities that would prevent this location from being approved. If a new restricted entity moves or is built too close to your location after the date of this certificate, that will not prevent you from receiving a license, provided you meet all other licensing requirements. This certificate is not a license to produce, process, or sell cannabis at this proposed location. You need to meet all other cannabis licensing requirements to receive your license at this location. It is important to note the following regarding this certificate: • If a disqualifying factor is found and existed prior to the date of this certificate (i.e., existing park or other restricted entity), it may prevent you from receiving your license or operating at this location. • This certificate is only valid for this application and location address. If your application is withdrawn, this certificate is no longer valid. • This certificate does not ensure compliance with local laws. You will need to check with your city or county for building permits, zoning, and other local area requirements. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you. Marcus Mendez Licensing Specialist Senior marcus.mendez@lcb.wa.gov Page 107 of 166 June 19, 2026 Dear City of Pasco Officials, On behalf of Elite Investment GRP, LLC, landlord of the property located at 5804 Rd 90, Suites F&G, Pasco, WA 99301, we are writing in support of Compas LLC and its request for approval to operate a cannabis retail location at this property. Suites F&G are currently being used as a cannabis retail location by Green 2 Go, which has operated at this location since July 2023. During that time, this use has been established within the property and surrounding area without creating disruption to our business complex. We understand the City’s concerns regarding crime, safety, surrounding businesses, nearby residents, and the overall economic impact of this type of use. Based on our experience as the property owner, those concerns have not been realized at this location. Neighboring businesses in the complex have had no issues with the current cannabis use, and the heightened security measures required for this type of operation have contributed to a stronger sense of safety within the building. The property is in a professional business complex with both commercial and residential uses nearby. The local demand for this use has already been proven in this area of town through the current operation at this exact location. Compas LLC’s proposed operation represents a continuation of an already established and accepted use, not the introduction of an unfamiliar business activity to the area. With proper compliance, security, and responsible business practices, we are confident this location can continue to operate safely, professionally, and in a manner that supports the City of Pasco’s economic interests. Elite Investment GRP, LLC respectfully supports the approval of Compas LLC’s request for the continued cannabis retail use of 5804 Rd 90, Suites F&G. If the City has any questions or would like any additional information, please feel free to contact us. Respectfully, Docusign Envelope ID: AA4AF7BA-BFCE-8401-8106-940F02C93D2E Page 108 of 166 C o m p a s C a n n a b i s L L C E C O N O M I C B R I E F — P A S C O C I T Y C O U N C I L June 16, 2026 Social Equity Retail Applicant Franklin County · WSLCB SE Program Road 90, Pasco WA Pasco's four licensed cannabis retailers generated an estimated $23.6M+ in annual pre-tax retail sales in 2025 — producing excise and sales tax revenue that stays in Washington. Approving Compas as a fifth license adds a locally-owned, state-mandated social equity operator to that base. Denial does not reduce the market. It moves Compas to Franklin County outside Pasco, and the revenue follows. $23.6M+ E S T . A N N U A L P A S C O C A N N A B I S R E T A I L S A L E S ( 2 0 2 5 ) $8.7M+ E S T . A N N U A L S T A T E E X C I S E T A X ( 3 7 % ) G E N E R A T E D 4 C U R R E N T L I C E N S E D R E T A I L E R S O P E R A T I N G I N P A S C O 10–15 J O B S C R E A T E D B Y C O M P A S A T O P E N I N G C U R R E N T P A S C O M A R K E T — 2 0 2 5 A C T U A L S R E T A I L E R E S T . M O N T H L Y S A L E S Green2Go (Road 68) $437,147 Lucky Leaf (Road 68) $587,620 Lucky Leaf Downtown ~$571,832 Pacific Outpost $285,487 4-Store Monthly Total ~$1.97M Source: Top Shelf Data / Tri-Cities Business News, 2025 C O M P A S — P R O J E C T E D Y E A R - O N E I M P A C T M E T R I C E S T I M A T E Monthly pre-tax sales $200–300K Annual pre-tax sales $2.4–3.6M State excise tax (37%)$888K–$1.33M Pasco sales tax (~2.4%)$57K–$86K/yr Jobs at opening 10–15 FTE Modeled on Pacific Outpost Year 1 ($235K/mo avg); conservative baseline. Page 109 of 166 The decision before Council is not whether this license exists — it does. Compas holds a pending WSLCB Social Equity license under RCW 69.50.335. Under WAC 314-55-570 and WAC 314-55-079, a social equity licensee denied city placement may locate anywhere within Franklin County. Pasco denial = Pasco revenue loss. L E G A L B A S I S F O R A 5 T H P A S C O L I C E N S E W H Y C O M P A S — L O C A L O W N E R S H I P M A T T E R S W A S H I N G T O N P R E C E D E N T — W H A T H A P P E N S W H E N C I T I E S O P E N Cities across Washington that lifted cannabis bans experienced immediate capture of tax revenue that had been leaving their jurisdictions. Lacey's first retail approval preceded measurable growth in cannabis-related retail activity in the surrounding area. Pasco's own experience confirms this: the city lifted its ban in June 2023, and four retailers are now operating with combined monthly sales approaching $2M — revenue that previously flowed to unincorporated Benton County operators. Approving Compas extends that same logic: keep the economic activity inside Pasco's tax base. The ask is narrow. Compas requests City of Pasco consent to locate its WSLCB- issued Social Equity retail license at the Road 90 site. This is not a vote to expand cannabis policy. The policy was set in 2023. This is a vote to ensure Pasco — not another Franklin County jurisdiction — captures the tax revenue, the jobs, and the RCW 69.50.335 authorizes WSLCB to issue social equity retail licenses above the standard local cap through July 2032. → WAC 314-55-570(4)(d) allows SE licensees to locate anywhere within their designated county, including cities above allotment, with local consent. → WAC 314-55-570(e) gives cities the ability to object based on density ordinances — making city approval the operative mechanism. → Council approval is not a policy vote on cannabis. It is consent to capture local economic benefit from a state-issued license. → Tri-Cities founders. Zachary Fairley and Steve Garrido are local. Revenue reinvests locally, not to out-of-state operators. → Road 90 location secured. Lease signed. Site is zoned commercial and has been previously occupied by a cannabis retailer (Green2Go). → Community reinvestment. Founders have committed to youth-focused nonprofit support and local hiring as operating priorities. → State-verified SE applicants. Compas was selected through WSLCB's competitive social equity scoring process — not self-designated. → Page 110 of 166 local ownership that come with a state-mandated license that will be issued regardless of tonight's action. Compas Cannabis LLC · Pasco, WA · WSLCB Social Equity Applicant Prepared for City Council, June 16, 2026 · Industry Advisory: PACK Corporation, Seattle WA Page 111 of 166 PACK CORPORATION Management & Advisory Services 92 Lenora Street, Seattle, WA 98121 June 19, 2026 Eric Ferguson, City Attorney Kerr Law Group / City of Pasco 525 N. 3rd Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 RE: Letter of Support – Compas LLC, WSLCB Social Equity Application No. 445257, 5804 Road 90, Pasco, WA 99301 Dear Mr. Ferguson and Members of the Pasco City Council: My name is George Jordan. I am a Washington State licensed attorney and the President of PACK Corporation, a Seattle-based management and advisory firm serving cannabis operators across Washington State. I write in support of Compas LLC's pending WSLCB Social Equity retail license application and its request for the City of Pasco's consent to operate at 5804 Road 90, Suites F&G. I have over ten years of direct experience in Washington State's regulated cannabis industry, spanning producer, processor, and retail operations, licensing, multi-entity management, and regulatory compliance. I have worked as an operator and assisted many other operators across the state — from early licensees in cities that were among the first to open their markets, to operators navigating complex WSLCB licensing processes today. That experience gives me a clear perspective on what distinguishes operators who succeed and benefit their communities from those who do not. Compas meets the highest standard on each of the following dimensions I consider when evaluating a cannabis operator. Local ownership and community accountability - Zachary Fairley and his co-founders are Tri-Cities residents. They are not outside investors or absentee operators seeking to extract revenue from Pasco. They are members of this community who will live with the consequences of how this business is run. That accountability is the single most reliable predictor of a well- operated cannabis retail location. Demonstrated commitment - Compas has executed a five-year NNN lease at 5804 Road 90, delivered substantial prepaid rent and security deposits, and invested significant personal resources to reach this stage of the licensing process. This is not a speculative application — it is a serious business with real skin in the game. Site suitability- The proposed location has housed a WSLCB-licensed cannabis retailer continuously since July 2023. Three years of operation at this address without incident, neighbor complaint, or safety concern is the strongest possible evidence that this site is appropriate for cannabis retail. The WSLCB has confirmed location compliance. The property owner has confirmed community compatibility. The record is clear. Regulatory compliance posture - Cannabis retail in Washington State operates under one of the most rigorous regulatory frameworks in the country. Operators who succeed long-term do so because they treat compliance as a core operational value, not a burden. In my professional assessment, Compas has the structure, the guidance, and the commitment to operate in full compliance with all WSLCB requirements. Page 112 of 166 Economic benefit to Pasco - Washington State's cannabis excise tax generates meaningful revenue that benefits the communities where licensed retailers operate. Compas projects annual retail sales of $2.4–$3.6 million in year one, with 10–15 local jobs created at opening. I have seen this pattern repeat across Washington municipalities that moved from restricted to open markets — economic activity follows licensing, and it stays where the license is. If Pasco consents to Compas' application, that benefit stays in Pasco. If it does not, it moves to another Franklin County jurisdiction. --------- The density argument the City may raise deserves a direct response. The four-license cap applied to Pasco under WAC 314-55-079 was calculated using population data that is now materially out of date. Pasco's population has grown to an estimated 83,888 in 2026 — an increase of more than 8% since the 2020 census upon which the original cap was based — and census data reflects approximately 9.2% growth from 2019 to 2024 alone. A license cap derived from older population figures does not reflect the community Pasco has become. The Social Equity program exists precisely to give local governments and the WSLCB the flexibility to respond to that reality. Approving Compas is not an exception to the density framework — it is the framework working as designed. The growth is not abstract, and it is concentrated directly in the corridor where Compas proposes to operate. The Road 90 location sits at the doorstep of the most significant commercial development in Pasco's recent history. The City of Pasco has itself committed nearly $40 million in Tax Increment Financing to the Broadmoor district — infrastructure investment the City authorized because it expects the population and commercial density in this west Pasco corridor to grow substantially in the years ahead. That public investment decision is the clearest possible signal that the City's own planning vision anticipates a more commercially active, more populous west Pasco than the one that existed when the four-license cap was set. Private capital has followed the City's lead. Visconsi Companies, an Ohio-based shopping center developer drawn specifically by Pasco's demographics and growth trajectory, is moving forward on Riverbend Marketplace at Broadmoor Boulevard and Sandifur Parkway, a grocery- anchored development that includes a 63,000-square-foot grocery anchor, a hotel, restaurant pads, and retail storefronts, with all commercial spaces reportedly spoken for before a shovel has broken ground. A second developer, Elevated Property Co., has signed a letter of intent on a 100-plus-acre site for The Shops at Broadmoor, a project targeting national retailers including Whole Foods and Crate & Barrel. Four residential projects near Burns Road will add an estimated 1,500 homes to the Broadmoor area, and the Pasco Aquatics Center opened in June 2026 as a major civic anchor for the corridor. This is not a neighborhood in equilibrium; it is a neighborhood in active transformation, adding residents, retail, and civic investment at a pace that the existing license cap was never designed to serve. A community adding thousands of residents and hundreds of millions of dollars in commercial investment within a single corridor is not a community that is overserved by five cannabis retail licenses. It is a community that will shortly need more. Approving Compas now - a local Social Equity operator with a secured location at the heart of this growth corridor - is the decision that serves Pasco's long-term interests. I have seen Washington cities observe growth trends and act ahead of them, and I have seen cities lag behind. The cities that act ahead of the curve capture the economic benefit and strengthen the businesses that serve their growing communities. The cities that lag export that benefit to their neighbors. Page 113 of 166 I am available to speak with City staff, the City Attorney, or any Council member directly if it would be helpful to do so Respectfully, George Jordan President, PACK Corporation WSBA Active Member #45421 george@packcorpwa.com (206) 438-4480 Page 114 of 166 Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board Licensing Division: Cannabis Unit 1025 Union Ave SE, P.O. Box 43098 Olympia, WA 98504-3098 Customer Service: (360) 664-1600 Fax: (360) 753-2710 \ Website: www.lcb.wa.gov NOTICE OF CANNABIS LICENSE APPLICATION Please reply to the original email and attach your completed form . Click the Reply or Reply All option to make sure your response is correctly routed. DATE: 7/8/2026 TO: MAYOR OF PASCO RE: New License Application UBI: 6059993280010001 License: 445257 - 7W Trade Name: COMPAS CANNABIS COMPANY Loc Addr: 5804 ROAD 90 STE G PASCO WA 99301 Mail Addr: 711 W LEOLA ST PASCO WA 99301-3629 Contact Phone No.: 509-380-8858 Privileges Applied For: Social Equity Cannabis Retailer Endorsements Applied For: Medical Cannabis Endorsement APPLICANTS: COMPAS LLC Zachary James Fairley, 10/31/1981 Moises Serna, 08/27/1976 Estevan Raul Garrido, 09/24/1983 FOREST LANE GORDON, 11/02/1992 As required by RCW 69.50.331(7), the Liquor and Cannabis Board is notifying you that the above has applied for a cannabis license. You have 20 days from the date of this notice to provide input on this application. If we do not receive this notice back within 20 days, we will assume you have no objection to the issuance of the license. If you need additional time to respond, you must Page 115 of 166 Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board Licensing Division: Cannabis Unit 1025 Union Ave SE, P.O. Box 43098 Olympia, WA 98504-3098 Customer Service: (360) 664-1600 Fax: (360) 753-2710 \ Website: www.lcb.wa.gov submit a written request for an extension of up to 20 days, with the reason(s) you need more time. If you need information on SSN, contact LCB’s Cannabis CHRI at (360) 664-1704. 1. Do you approve of the applicant? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Do you approve of the location? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . If you disapprove, per RCW 69.50.331(7)(c) you MUST attach a letter to the Board detailing the reason(s) for the objection providing facts on which your objection(s) are based. DATE SIGNATURE OF MAYOR, CITY MANAGER, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, OR DESIGNEE YES NO Page 116 of 166 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 8, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 8/3/26 FROM: Bill Parramore, Captain-Patrol Police Department SUBJECT: Mind the Gap: Navigating Language Barriers in Traffic stops. (15-minute presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Presentation: Mind the Gap: Navigating Language Barriers in Traffic Stops Research Brief II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presentation by Dr. Hillary Mellinger from Washington State University III. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this presentation. The presentation is informational only. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background The Washington Traffic Safety Commission funded a research study examining how law between and stops interactions affect barriers language traffic enforcement officers and community members with limited English proficiency. The and stops from footage traffic body-worn analyzed study camera interviewed officers from a Washington law enforcement agency to identify current practices, challenges, and opportunities for improving language access during traffic stops. The findings provide practical recommendations to improve communication, supporting officer safety, and public understanding while compliance with federal and state language access requirements. Impact (other than fiscal) Receiving this presentation will increase awareness of language access challenges during traffic stops and highlight best practices that promote effective communication, strengthen community trust, and improve public Page 117 of 166 safety. The information may also assist the city in evaluating future training opportunities and language access resources for law enforcement personnel. V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation: No action is requested. This item is for informational purposes only. Page 118 of 166 Mind the Gap: Navigating Language Barriers in Traffic Stops City of Pasco, Washington: City Council Regular Meeting August 3, 2026 Hillary Mellinger Assistant Professor Dept. of Criminal Justice & Criminology Washington State University Brittany Solensten PhD Candidate & Prior CSI Lab Manager Dept. of Criminal Justice & Criminology Washington State University Pa g e 1 1 9 o f 1 6 6 Introduction Findings & Conclusion AppendixResearch Questions Presentation Outline Methods Pa g e 1 2 0 o f 1 6 6 Introduction: Why this project? Pa g e 1 2 1 o f 1 6 6 Introduction The impetus for this study came from: •MY BACKGROUND •Prior work at a nonprofit that supported immigrant survivors of violence, many of whom navigated language barriers •LEGAL LANDSCAPE •Title VI requires recipients of federal financial assistance (such as law enforcement) to provide meaningful language access to individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) •ACADEMIC SILENCE •Lack of criminal justice literature on this topic, although studies from the medical field provide some insight Pa g e 1 2 2 o f 1 6 6 •The safety of everyone in a traffic stop, especially if there are misunderstandings •Ability to request information (license, registration, etc.) •Ability to explain the reason for a traffic stop (e.g., expired tabs) •Ability to describe next steps to the driver and verify the driver’s understanding •Ultimately, we know from medical literature how doctors ”get by” with language barriers (Michalec et al., 2015; Diamond et al., 2008). •We have less knowledge about how officers manage with language barriers. We should know what works, what doesn’t work, and how we can support officers. Language Barriers Affect… Pa g e 1 2 3 o f 1 6 6 Research Questions Pa g e 1 2 4 o f 1 6 6 •What language access tools do officers use in traffic stops with language barriers? •What are helpful strategies? •What approaches are less productive? •What can law enforcement agencies, officers, and drivers do to support each other in addressing language barriers? Research Questions Pa g e 1 2 5 o f 1 6 6 Methods Pa g e 1 2 6 o f 1 6 6 Data & Methods •Body-Worn Camera Footage of traffic stops - Random sample of 84 traffic stops from Jul. 1 – Oct. 31, 2022 X - Of these, 43 traffic stops involved language barriers - Quantitatively coded in Complex Social Interactions (CSI) Lab - Qualitatively coded by Primary Investigator (PI) •Interviews with Officers - 15 interviews conducted in Summer 2026 X - All were male, 10 were White, 5 identified as Hispanic or “other” - 5 were bilingual officers - Qualitatively coded by Primary Investigator (PI) What works? x What doesn’t work? Pa g e 1 2 7 o f 1 6 6 BWC Findings Pa g e 1 2 8 o f 1 6 6 Site Description NO BARRIER •Fluent English 31 traffic stops •Fluent Spanish 10 traffic stops LANGUAGE BARRIER •43 traffic stops •16 traffic stops Minor Barrier •20 traffic stops Moderate Barrier • 7 stops Major Barrier RATIONALE •We assessed whether there were differences in how officers conducted traffic stops with language barriers versus without. Chart 1: Traffic Stops by Spoken Language and Level of Language Barrier BWC Descriptive Statistics Pa g e 1 2 9 o f 1 6 6 BWC Findings PANTOMIME •Language Barriers 63% •No Barriers 19% REASON FOR STOP •Provided 96% •Not Provided 4% IMPORTANT TAKEAWAY Officers gave the reason for the stop regardless xof whether or not there was a language barrier. CAVEAT #1 •Findings are only for the 43 traffic stops in our sample. •LanguageLine may have been used in traffic stops not in our sample. CAVEAT #2 •A single traffic stop could involve multiple language access tools (e.g., “Survival Spanish” and Google Translate). * See Appendix for severity of language barrier Pa g e 1 3 0 o f 1 6 6 Interview Findings Pa g e 1 3 1 o f 1 6 6 Interviews There are five findings from our interviews with 15 officers: •FINDING #1 •Interviewees discussed the strengths and limitations of five language access tools they used (see Appendix). •FINDING #2 •Interviewees gave five suggestions for their fellow officers about how to successfully mitigate language barriers. •FINDING #3 •Some interviewees discussed a script for traffic stops that included three components: an introduction, a closing statement, and an assessment of the driver’s understanding. •FINDING #4 •Interviewees identified seven practices that they viewed as being less productive for navigating language barriers. •FINDING #5 •Interviewees shared how their agency, fellow officers, and drivers could work together to address language barriers. Pa g e 1 3 2 o f 1 6 6 #1 – Strengths of Language Access Resources Survival Spanish An officer who used Survival Spanish for routine stops stated: “Have you heard of the three E's of traffic? …. the big one is education, education and enforcement, really... Are we able to do… those effectively if we can't communicate with somebody? ” (Officer 15). Adult Civilians or Passengers “how much I use [an adult passenger or civilian] depends on the level of burden that is present that I need. If it is a criminal investigation, I'm getting an officer that speaks Spanish” (Officer 5). Bilingual Officers ”Having a Spanish-speaking officer come to your location is always the most dependable because generally they understand that you're going to translate word for word but also have the law enforcement perspective" (Officer 1) Google Translate "sometimes people will even use their phone and talk or text into the phone and then hand it to me and I'm able to respond. That is actually a good tool…[but only] if it's a basic type incident that you're dealing with” (Officer 10). Language Line “I think the LanguageLine is a great tool that the department has provided, especially for a lot of the languages where we don't have bilingual officers, Vietnamese, Russian, those type of things. It's difficult to find people that speak that” (Officer 9). Pa g e 1 3 3 o f 1 6 6 Site Description Helpful vs. Less Productive HELPFUL •KISS – Keep It Short & Simple •Speak in a Friendly and Measured Cadence •Exercise Patience •Build Rapport •Develop Linguistic & Cultural Awareness LESS PRODUCTIVE •Unclear, Technical, or Confusing Speech •Speaking Louder •Negative Mindsets •Unclear or Incorrect “Survival Spanish” •Making Assumptions •Not Giving the Reasons(s) for the Stop •Using Potentially Biased Interpreters Pa g e 1 3 4 o f 1 6 6 Site Description Helpful vs. Less Productive HELPFUL •Exercise Patience “Allow time, whatever time is necessary to be able to communicate accurately. Really hear out the person… You can't be narrow-minded and [say], "I'm in a hurry to get this traffic stop done." It's really, take the time and do it right.” - Officer 8 LESS PRODUCTIVE •Making Assumptions “You shouldn't assume that they're understanding … read their body language, think about how quick they're replying and if they're saying "si" [yes] to every question… Because I've seen that a lot on both languages [English and Spanish] … sometimes you just agree because you're uncomfortable.” - Officer 1 Pa g e 1 3 5 o f 1 6 6 Script for Stops Some interviewees discussed a script with three components for stops: •INTRODUCTION •Interviewees shared that officers should state the below: •Their name •The name of the agency they represent •Whether the driver is being audio and video recorded •The reason(s) for the stop •CLOSING STATEMENT •Interviewees stated that this should entail the following: •Their reason(s) for the stop •The outcome of the stop (e.g., warning, citation, or arrest) •Any next steps (e.g., paying a fine, mitigating the ticket, or contesting the ticket) •CHECK FOR UNDERSTANDING •Interviewees suggested that this might include the below: •Explicitly asking the driver if they have any questions •Assessing body language •Knowing that agreement does not equal understanding Pa g e 1 3 6 o f 1 6 6 Site Description Working Together AGENCIES •Hire Bilingual Officers •Encourage Spanish Language Proficiency •Invest in Technology that Supports Language Access Hiring more is “easy to say, hard to do… Not everybody that's applying is a bilingual, and there's a criteria that needs to be met.” - Officer 8 FELLOW OFFICERS •Identify Appropriate Tool(s) •Use Bilingual Officers for Complex, Sensitive, or Criminal Matters •Be Cognizant of Bilingual Officers’ Potentially Higher Demands “If you know that your partner, bilingual officer, is taking a bunch of calls for you, I think you should do the same for him. So kind of help each other.” - Officer 4 DRIVERS •Know Traffic Rules & Documents •Meet Officers Halfway, If Possible (Basic English & “Survival Spanish”) •Be Patient with Officers •Attend Outreach Events “we're doing the best we can... And with that in mind, just give us a little grace, a little patience while we get those resources on scene.” - Officer 14 Pa g e 1 3 7 o f 1 6 6 Conclusion Pa g e 1 3 8 o f 1 6 6 Future Research We are entering a world in which: •Officers are tasked with more, •Communities’ linguistic and cultural identities are changing, and •Technological advancements for language access are evolving. All of this is occurring without the world pausing long enough for: •Officers to gauge what works and does not work, •Communities to give feedback on if language access is meaningful, and •Technological innovators to assess how well Artificial Intelligence (AI) is up to the task. Pa g e 1 3 9 o f 1 6 6 •Assess to what extent technological tools may help or hinder language access •Determine which language access tools are most useful for different situations •Receive input from officers and community members about language access •Collaborate together (agencies, officers, & community) to address language barriers Looking Ahead… Pa g e 1 4 0 o f 1 6 6 Questions? This research was funded by the Washington Traffic Safety Commission (WTSC). We thank the law enforcement agency that dedicated its time and resources to this project. This research was also made possible by the Complex Social Interactions Lab at Washington State University. Thank You! hillary.mellinger@wsu.edu brittany.solensten@wsu.edu Pa g e 1 4 1 o f 1 6 6 Appendix Pa g e 1 4 2 o f 1 6 6 BWC Findings REASON FOR STOP •Provided 96% •Not Provided 4% Pa g e 1 4 3 o f 1 6 6 REASON FOR STOP •Provided 96% •Not Provided 4% Pa g e 1 4 4 o f 1 6 6 #1 – Limitations of Language Access Resources Survival Spanish - Causes Confusion or Misunderstanding if Not Used Correctly - Not Appropriate for Complex, Sensitive, or Criminal Matters (Not Vetted as an Interpreter) - BWC Findings: 34 of 43 stops (79%) with a language barrier – 1st Most Used Language Tool Adult Civilians or Passengers - Potentially Biased / Not Neutral Third Parties - Not Appropriate for Complex, Sensitive, or Criminal Matters (Not Vetted as an Interpreter) - BWC Findings: 9 of 43 stops (21%) with a language barrier – 2nd Most Used Language Tool Bilingual Officers - Limited Resources - Role Conflict (Officer vs. Interpreter) - BWC Findings: 5 of 43 stops (12%) with a language barrier – 3rd Most Used Language Tool Google Translate - Can Increase Confusion or Misunderstanding - Not Appropriate for Complex, Sensitive, or Criminal Matters (Insufficiently Vetted as a Tool ) - BWC Findings: 3 of 43 stops (7%) with a language barrier – 4th Most Used Language Tool Language Line - Traffic Noise / Highway Noise - Safety Considerations (officer’s attention split between the phone and their surroundings) - BWC Findings: 0 of 43 stops (0%) with a language barrier (*possible sampling bias) Pa g e 1 4 5 o f 1 6 6 Interview Questions 1.Do you speak any languages other than English? 2.How often do you need to communicate in a language other than English during traffic stops? 3.How do you “get by” when you have a language barrier in a traffic stop? 4.Can you give an example of successfully navigating a language barrier during a traffic stop? 5.What are helpful strategies / tools that officers can use when dealing with language barriers? 6.Can you give an example of the opposite – when there was room for improvement in navigating a language barrier during a traffic stop? 7.What are less productive / less helpful strategies for navigating language barriers? 8.What are some of the consequences of being unable to communicate during traffic stops? 9.Can you give an example of a cultural misunderstanding during a traffic stop? 10.How do officers establish rapport while navigating language and cultural differences during traffic stops? 11.What should agencies consider so that bilingual officers don’t have disproportionate workloads? 12.What does support, specifically when navigating language barriers, look like to you? 13.What are pressure points or challenges in you receiving the support that you need? 14.Is there anything we did not discuss today that you would like to add? Pa g e 1 4 6 o f 1 6 6 Mind the Gap: Navigating Language Barriers in Traffic Stops Report* and Brief prepared by Hillary Mellinger and Brittany Solensten Traffic stops represent an important opportunity for officer and community member engagement insofar as they are a relatively common and routine way that law enforcement personnel interact with members of the public. As such, traffic stops are useful ways in which officers can leave a positive impression on community members, educate drivers, and increase the likelihood that members of the public will reach out to the police for help in the future. However, language barriers can impede all of these things: trust, education, and public safety. Language barriers make it more difficult for an officer to request information from a driver (e.g., their license), explain why they stopped a driver (e.g., speeding), and describe next steps to a driver (e.g., pay a flne). In addition, the potential for traffic stops to become fatal or involve excessive use of force may be increased when an officer and a driver speak different languages. Finally, language barriers during traffic stops can hinder an officer’s ability to question a driver, conduct a fleld sobriety test, or issue a Miranda warning, all of which may have legal implications in future judicial proceedings.1 Further complicating things, language barriers may go hand-in-hand with cultural differences. Officers, of course, cannot be expected to have working knowledge of every possible language or culture they might encounter in their jobs. However, there are potential language access tools that could support law enforcement. Before adopting any of these solutions, agencies need to assess and make informed decisions about officers’ current strategies when responding to language barriers and the effectiveness of those strategies. Research Questions • What language access tools do officers use for traffic stops with language barriers? • What strategies do officers identify as being helpful or, conversely, less productive when navigating language barriers? • What can law enforcement agencies, officers, and drivers do to support each other in addressing language barriers? The purpose of this research is to help law enforcement officers identify and mitigate challenges posed by Spanish language barriers during traffic stops. Page 147 of 166 Mind the Gap pg. 2 of 6 Legal Landscape Law enforcement agencies that receive federal flnancial aid are prohibited from discriminating on the basis of national origin, which may include not taking reasonable steps to provide meaningful language access, pursuant to the below: • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, • Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, • Multiple Supreme Court decisions, including Lau v. Nichols (1974), and • Revised Code of Washington 49.60. Language Access Plans Law enforcement agencies are encouraged to draft, adopt, and regularly update Language Access Plans, also referred to as plans for individuals with Limited English Proflciency, that best flt the speciflc needs and circumstances of the communities they serve. Examples of these plans in Washington state include: • King County Sheriff’s Office's (KCSO)’s “Language Access Services for Persons Who Are Limited English Proflcient (LEP)."2 • Washington State Patrol’s (WSP)’s “Title VI Language Access Plan 2025."3 Why It Matters LEP plans are meant to increase officers’ efficacy, reduce the likelihood of agencies responding to costly litigation from civil suits, and ensure that agencies comply with federal law.1 LEP plans can also support officers with the dual challenge of overcoming communication barriers while also building trust with linguistically and culturally diverse communities.4 As Carl R. Peed, the former director of the U.S. Department of Justice's (USDOJ) Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) notes, "By developing and implementing a language access plan, law enforcement agencies will be able to strengthen their police-community relations, increase trust, and be better positioned to address public safety problems.”5 Data & Methods We analyzed two sources of data: • Body-Worn Camera Footage — We randomly sampled 84 traffic stops, 43 of which had language barriers, that were conducted between July 1, 2022, and October 31, 2022. We then quantitatively and qualitatively coded the BWC footage associated with these 84 traffic stops. • Interviews — We used convenience sampling to interview 15 officers in Summer 2025 about their experiences and views regarding language barriers during traffic stops. All 15 interviewees were male; 10 identifled as White, 5 identifled as Hispanic or another race, and 5 were bilingual. We then qualitatively coded the interview transcripts for common themes and/or experiences. This data came from a police agency in Washington state that serves a predominantly Hispanic community, many of whom speak a language other than English at home. Page 148 of 166 Body-Worn Camera Footage of Traffic Stops We randomly sampled and coded 84 traffic stops conducted between July 1, 2022, and October 31, 2022. Of those, 43 traffic stops involved a language barrier, and 41 traffic stops had no language barrier (i.e., the officer and driver both spoke fiuent English or fiuent Spanish). This allowed us to assess whether there were any differences in how officers conducted traffic stops with language barriers versus without language barriers. Results Of five different language access resources, officers most relied upon “Survival Spanish” (79% of stops), deflned as basic Spanish vocabulary, followed by having an adult passenger or civilian serve as an interpreter (21% of stops), receiving assistance from a bilingual officer (12% of stops), using Google Translate (7% of stops), and relying on LanguageLine (0% of stops). There are two caveats to these flndings. First, these flndings only pertain to the BWC footage of the 43 stops involving language barriers. This means that LanguageLine may be used in traffic stops, but that it was not captured in the 43 stops involving a language barrier in our random sample. Indeed, a few of the 15 interviewees discussed using LanguageLine, but noted they relied on it less during traffic stops due to traffic noise and safety considerations. Second, a single traffic stop could involve multiple language access tools (e.g., “Survival Spanish” and a bilingual officer). Officers pantomimed more frequently in stops with language barriers (63%) compared to stops without language barriers (19%). Officers provided the reason for the stop regardless of whether or not there was a language barrier present; speciflcally, in 81 of 84 traffic stops (96% of stops), the driver was informed of the reason for the stop. 12% Used a bilingual officer to interpret 7% Used Google Translate 79% Used “Survival Spanish” Adult passenger or civilian interpreted 21% ¿Licencia? No luz. Language Access Resources* Of the 43 stops with a language barrier: * a single stop could involve multiple language access resources. ** Less used due to traffic noise and safety considerations, per some interviewees. 0% Used LanguageLine** Mind the Gap pg. 3 of 6 Page 149 of 166 Interviews with Officers We interviewed 15 officers via convenience sampling in Summer 2025. These 15 interviewees offered several insights into their experiences with language barriers. Finding #1 Interviewees explained the strengths and limitations of flve different language access tools they used (see Table 1 at the end of this brief). For example, while interviewees considered bilingual officers to be their preferred resource for mitigating language barriers, they generally only used them for serious or complex traffic stops due to resource constraints (i.e., insufficient bilingual officers). Finding #2 Interviewees provided flve pieces of advice for their fellow officers for addressing language barriers: Keep statements short and simple. Speak in a measured cadence. Be patient. Build rapport. Develop linguistic and cultural awareness. Finding #3 A few interviewees focused on the importance of the beginning and ending scripts of traffic stops, and recommended that they include the following three components: First, a comprehensive introduction that includes the officer stating the below: • Their name, • The name of the agency they represent, • Whether or not the driver is being audio and video recorded, and • The reason(s) for the stop. Second, a closing statement that reiterates the following: • The reason(s) for the stop, • The outcome of the stop (such as a warning, citation, or arrest), and • Any next steps the driver should take (such as paying a flne, mitigating the ticket, or contesting the ticket). Third, an assessment of the driver’s understanding of the stop, as well as explicitly asking the driver if they have any questions about the reason(s) for the stop or next steps. Having a Spanish-speaking officer come to your location is always the most dependable because generally they understand that you're going to translate word for word but also have the law enforcement perspective. - Officer 7 Allow time, whatever time is necessary to be able to communicate accurately. Really hear out the person… You can't be narrow-minded and [say], "I'm in a hurry to get this traffic stop done." It's really, take the time and do it right. - Officer 8 Mind the Gap pg. 4 of 6 Page 150 of 166 Finding #4 Interviewees identified seven practices as being less productive for navigating language barriers during traffic stops: Unclear, technical, or confusing speech. Speaking louder. Negative mindsets. Unclear or incorrect “Survival Spanish.” Making assumptions. Not giving the reason(s) for the stop. Using potentially biased interpreters. Finding #5 Interviewees discussed how their agency, fellow officers, and drivers could support them in addressing language barriers. Agencies • Hire bilingual officers. • Encourage Spanish language proflciency. • Invest in technology that supports language access. Fellow Officers • Identify the most appropriate language access tool(s) for a given situation. • Rely on bilingual officers for complex, sensitive, or criminal matters. • Be cognizant of bilingual officers’ workloads and higher demands. Drivers • Be aware of traffic rules and what documents are needed for a traffic stop. • Meet officers halfway, if possible (driver uses basic English, officer uses “Survival Spanish”). • Show patience with officers. • Attend police outreach events, and cultivate an informed opinion about law enforcement by consulting multiple sources of data and news. Interviews with Officers If you know that your partner, bilingual officer, is taking a bunch of calls for you, I think you should do the same for him. So kind of help each other. - Officer 4 You shouldn't assume that they're understanding you… read their body language, think about how quick they're replying and if they're saying "si" [yes] to every question… Because I've seen that a lot on both languages [English and Spanish] … sometimes you just agree because you're uncomfortable. - Officer 1 Mind the Gap pg. 5 of 6 Page 151 of 166 Conclusion Limitations • Sampling bias for both our random sample of 84 traffic stops and our convenience sample of interviews. • Possible bias in both our quantitative and qualitative coding, as no researcher can be fully objective when making coding decisions. • Our quantitative codebook may have omitted variable and perception bias. • Our data come from one agency that is not representative of all agencies within Washington state or the United States. Future Research Technological tools and AI are rapidly advancing, often at a pace that supersedes their ability to be thoroughly vetted. Indeed, many of the interviewees in this study expressed some reservation over using Google Translate due to their perception that it was insufficiently vetted, even as they expressed enthusiasm for and interest in new Axon body-worn camera technology that allows for real-time interpretation, translation, and transcription. We are entering a world in which: • Officers are being tasked with more. • Communities’ linguistic and cultural identities are changing. • Technological advancements for language access are evolving. All this is occurring without the world pausing long enough for agencies, officers, community members, or technological innovators to fully assess how to respond to these changes. Looking Ahead... We do not fully know: • To what extent technological language access tools are up to the task. • Which language access resources are most useful for different situations. • Officers’ and community members’ views on language access tools. As we enter this new technological, linguistic, cultural, and legal landscape, researchers can support law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve by assessing how language access is provided. We urge law enforcement agencies, officers, and community members to collaborate together to address language barriers. Works Cited * Read the Report: Mind the Gap (2026) 1 Venkatraman (2006) 2 King County Sheriff’s Office (2024) 3 Washington State Patrol (2025) 4 Schanzer et al. (2016) 5 Shah & Estrada (2009) Funding This research was funded by the Washington Traffic Safety Commission. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the law enforcement agency that dedicated their time and resources to this research. This research was also made possible by Complex Social Interactions Lab at Washington State University. Mind the Gap pg. 6 of 6 Page 152 of 166 Ta b l e 1 . L a n g u a g e A c c e s s R e s o u r c e s : S t r e n g t h s a n d L i m i t a t i o n s Bi l i n g u a l Of f i c e r Su r v i v a l Sp a n i s h Ad u l t Pa s s e n g e r o r Ci v i l i a n La n g u a g e Li n e Go o g l e Tr a n s l a t e o r A I To o l In -Pe r s o n * * X * Im m e d i a t e A s s i s t a n c e X X X X Ve t t e d f o r L a n g u a g e P r o f l c i e n c y X X La w E n f o r c e m e n t E x p e r t i s e X Us e f u l f o r R o u t i n e S t o p s X X X X Av a i l a b l e f o r N u m e r o u s L a n g u a g e s X Ca n I d e n t i f y & “Sp e a k ” La n g u a g e X No t I n -Pe r s o n X X X Po s s i b l e T i m e D e l a y t o A c c e s s R e s o u r c e X X No t V e t t e d f o r L a n g u a g e P r o f l c i e n c y X X X La c k s L a w E n f o r c e m e n t E x p e r t i s e X X X Di f f i c u l t D u e t o T r a f f i c N o i s e & S a f e t y C o n c e r n s X X Fi n i t e R e s o u r c e s / W o r k l o a d C o n s i d e r a t i o n s X Ro l e C o n f i i c t ( i . e . , d o i n g t w o r o l e s a t o n c e ) X X Po s s i b l e B i a s X Ma y C a u s e C o n f u s i o n / M i s u n d e r s t a n d i n g X X X No t f o r C o m p l e x , S e n s i t i v e o r C r i m i n a l M a t t e r s X X X In c o n s i s t e n t I n t e r p r e t a t i o n o r T r a n s l a t i o n Qu a l i t y X X Ad d i t i o n a l C o s t t o L a w E n f o r c e m e n t Ag e n c i e s * * ** X * In -Pe r s o n : T h i s i s a l a n g u a g e r e s o u r c e t h a t i s g e n e r a l l y a v a i l a b l e i n -pe r s o n , b u t n o t a l w a y s ; i t c a n b e p r o v i d e d t e l e p h o n i c a l l y , as i n t h e c a s e o f a n of f i c e r c a l l i n g a b i l i n g u a l p a r t n e r , o r a d r i v e r c a l l i n g a n a d u l t f r i e n d o r f a m i l y m e m b e r t o s e r v e a s a n i n t e r p r e t e r . ** A d d i t i o n a l C o s t : S o m e l a w e n f o r c e m e n t a g e n c i e s p r o v i d e a s a l a r y i n c r e a s e t o b i l i n g u a l o f f i c e r s a s a n i n c e n t i v e , w h e r e a s o t he r ag e n c i e s d o n o t . LIMITATIONS STRENGTHS Page 153 of 166 1 TO: Mayor, Charles Grimm Members of the City Council FROM: Harold Stewart, City Manager DATE: August 3, 2026 City Manager: The City Manager will not be in attendance at the August 3rd meeting due to the scheduling of the use of vacation time with family. The Employee Appreciation BBQ will be held August 20th from 11:30am to 1pm. Council is invited to help serve food and interact with the employees of the City. The event will take place at Pasco City Hall in the plaza area. 21 on Council with August organizing a is Staff facilitated retreat st. The retreat will provide direction to Staff from Council regarding community, organizational, and budget priorities for the next two years. While the Department Heads will provide updates specific to their responsibilities here are several priorities on in addition the to taking office being worked the City Manager identified by since regular day to day operational duties (Changes/updates from the last report are highlighted in red): 1. Broadmoor Development- Meetings are ongoing discussing developer interest, progress, and potential City partnership. Agreements are being negotiated. First agreement with Visconsi was approved at the July 20th Council meeting. A development agreement with Elevated is still being prepared by staff and consultants. 2. HAPO Center- Lease expired after December 2025. County and City discussing future, roles and partnership going forward. Lease extension has been provided to the County. Still awaiting response from the County Commission on the 2nd offer to purchase the softball complex. 3. Animal Shelter- Serves the entire Tri-Cities. Cost sharing between the three jurisdictions needs re-evaluated and agreed upon. In addition, some issues have arisen with the old facility that will require significant investment to repair. Staff is preparing and identifying the anticipated needs and associated costs to discuss with Council in the near future. A deeper conversation amongst the Tri-Cities city managers has begun regarding the needs and structure of the Shelter going forward. 4. Hiring of IT Director – The first recruitment was not successful and the position is being recruited again. 5. FY 27/28 Budget-Staff is preparing a budget recommendation. 6. Public Dollars for Public Benefit- This item was tabled by Council until January 2027. 7. Employee Survey – Survey is open for employee participation. Page 154 of 166 2 8. Essential Public Facilities and LRAs- Staff is preparing an extension of the moratorium and the other directions from Council for action. 9. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)/Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) - The City of Pasco scheduled two public engagement meetings to gather community input on updates to CIP and TIP. The first meeting was held on April 8 at City Hall, with both virtual and in-person attendance options available. The second opportunity for community members to participate in-person was held on April 14 at Rey Reynolds Middle School. Staff are in the process of preparing CIP, with presentation to Council planned for month of August and adoption in September. 10. Crash Prevention Zone - Discussion and direction took place at the July 6th Council meeting. The approved letter, signed by the mayor has been provided to DOT and a meeting has been scheduled for the last week of July with to coordinate next steps. 11. Joint Council & Legislative Entity Meetings - During a recent council meeting, there was discussion around coordinating joint Council and legislative entity meetings with key local partners. these for provided potential Council entities to bring up for meetings consideration. These meetings are intended to help strengthen relationships, align on shared priorities, and support Council’s goals and objectives moving forward. Staff is requesting direction from Council on which entities to proceed coordinating annual meetings and to work alongside to build a collaborative agenda. a. Pasco Chamber b. Pasco School District Board c. Franklin County d. Port of Pasco e. Mid-Columbia Libraries Board f. Union Gospel Mission (UGM), Clean Sweep, & U-Turn for Christ g. LBA h. Visit Tri-Cities i. Tri-City Hispanic Chamber of Commerce j. Downtown Business Roundtable k. Public Health District A joint meeting with the Pasco Chamber was held June 23rd. Staff will continue coordination of these meetings in the fall, after the upcoming Council Retreat. 12. City Council Retreat – The City Council Retreat has been scheduled for Friday, August 21, 2026, based on Council availability. Staff continues coordinating facilitation, securing an off-site venue, and finalizing the agenda and event logistics. Meetings attended since the last report: Communication meetings with the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and all members; Council Suites Hilton; by the Home 2 the attended ribbon cutting for meetingBoard Executive BIPIN the meeting; Executive Board BCES the attended attended ; participated in the ACA Management meeting; participated in the quarterly Downtown walk and meet with business owners; and many other internal communication and project meetings. Legal Matters: Below is a summary of the litigation matters currently pending against the City of Pasco. 1. Inosensio Buenaventura v. City of Pasco Police Department & City of Pasco Employee Counsel: Micheal J Throgmorton Current Status: Order dismissing the case has been granted with prejudice. Page 155 of 166 3 • September 2025: The Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint against a City of Pasco employee and the City of Pasco Police Department, seeking monetary damages related to an an Fourth their violations alleges of stop. traffic 2020, 25, April The Plaintiff d Fourteenth Amendment rights. • December 2025: The Court issued an Order Granting Opportunity to Amend Complaint after finding that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. • February 12, 2026: The Court granted the Plaintiff’s second Motion for Extension of Time to Amend the Complaint, extending the deadline to February 27, 2026. • February 27, 2026: The Plaintiff filed a Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel. • for and Bono Counsel Pro request the Plaintiff’s The Court 2026: 10, March denied dismissed the claims against the City of Pasco Police Department contained in the First Amended Complaint. The Court Clerk was also directed to issue a Summons, Notice of Lawsuit, and Request for Waiver of Service to the City of Pasco employee named in the lawsuit. • April 8th, 2026: The City filed a Motion to Dismiss, arguing that the claims are barred by the threeapplicable -statute otherwise complaint the that year limitations of fails and to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. • June 18th, 2026: Motion to dismiss was granted with prejudice. The plaintiff has 30 days to file an appeal to the Ninth Circuit. 2. Dave Swisher & Farm 2005 LLC v. City of Pasco Counsel: Adam Rosenberg & Bob Sterbank Lawsuit & Appeal: Land Use Petition act Challenge Current Status: Appeal filed with Division III of the Court of Appeals • April 2025: The City of Pasco became aware of a lawsuit filed by the Plaintiffs challenging the Hearing Examiner’s approval of the Madison Park North Preliminary Plat. The matter was filed conditicontesting appeal (LUPA) several Petition Use Land a as Act of ons approval imposed by the Hearing Examiner, including: o Condition 3 – LID ‘No Protest’ Condition: The Hearing Examiner required the Plat to include a statement waiving future protests to the formation of a road or utility LID o 17 Condition – Condition: parks, of collection Required Credit Fee Impact No transportation and school impact fees at the then-applicable rates. It also specified that a credit against TIFs was not required, based on related Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law determining that the required improvements to Road 52, Burns Road and Deseret Drive was no “system improvements” as that term is defined in state statute, and therefore no credit against impact fees was required. o Condition 19 – Street Improvement Condition: Required the plaintiff t to “ensure that PMC with accordance in constructed alignments designed are road all and 21.15.030(1) and (2), and the City’s codes and standards in relationship to adjoining plats and their streets. o Condition 21 – School Zone Warning Signs Condition - Required the plaintiff to install school zone advance warning beacons, and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons at the crosswalk leading to the Rosalind Franklin STEM Elementary School. Page 156 of 166 4 • December 2025: The Court conducted the hearing on the LUPA petition. • Examiner’s Hearing the affirming order an largely Court The 2026: January issued decision and dismissing the LUPA petition on all but one issue. The Court ruled in favor of the Burns 52 Road and Road the regarding finding 17, No. Condition Plaintiff that i As the result, a improvements.” larger City of constituted part mprovements “system Plaintiff was determined to be entitled to credit against Transportation Impact Fees for the costs associated with those roadway improvements. • March 2026: The Plaintiff appealed the Superior Court’s decision to Division III of the Washington State Court of Appeals. Lawsuit: Complaint Damages Current Status: Pending, awaiting resolution of the LUPA matter • April 2025: Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the City of Pasco alleging damages resulting from what they characterize as arbitrary, capricious, and unlawful agency actions related to permitting decisions and processing delays associated with the Madison Park North preliminary plat application. • May 2025: The lawsuit was removed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. 3. Corey Bitton, Tamara Bitton, Great Basin Land Co. LLC & Spritz, Inc v. City of Pasco and multiple City Employees Counsel: Quinn Plant Current Status: Pending • alleging Plaintiffs the by filed lawsuit a became aware City The 2025: December of arbitrary enforcement of the Pasco Municipal Code, failure to recognize vested permits, and the absence of constitutionally adequate appeal procedures. • February 2026: The City filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Plaintiffs subsequently filed motions seeking leave to exceed the applicable page limits and to expedite the hearing schedule. The City opposed both motions. • March 2026: The Court granted the Plaintiffs’ motions for excess pages and for an expedited hearing. • April 2026: The Court issued a scheduling order governing the progression of the case. 4. Lewis Place, LLC v. City of Pasco Counsel: Ogden, Murphey & Wallace PLLC Current Status: Lawsuit filed, preliminary hearing scheduled for July 1, 2026 • June 2026: The City of Pasco was made aware of a lawsuit filed by the plaintiffs stemming from the City’s hearing examiner’s land use decision granting a special use permit for the construction of an RV park at 434 E Lewis Place. This lawsuit involves a Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) challenge to the Hearing Examiner’s conditions of approval. The conditions that the plaintiff was arguing against were: Page 157 of 166 5 o Condition 1 – Site Plan Compliance Condition: Required the applicant to submit a revised site plan prior to construction permit issuance demonstrating full compliance with PMC 25.160, including RV spacing requirements, open space, landscaping and buffering standards, dimensional requirements for RV spaces, and all supporting measurements and calculations. Failure to demonstrate compliance could result in permit denial. o Condition 2 – Internal Circulation Plan Condition: Required the applicant to submit a revised internal circulation plan prior to construction permit issuance demonstrating safe and functional vehicle movement throughout the site, including compliant traffic circulation, elimination or mitigation of backing movements in one-way drive aisles, and clear identification of travel directions, turning movements, and access points. Additional Special Use Permit review could be required if circulation standards could not be met. o Condition 5 – RV Spacing Verification Condition: Required the applicant to demonstrate compliance with PMC 25.160.070(2) and minimum RV separation standards, including 15 feet side-to-side and 12 feet end-to-end spacing between recreational vehicle units, prior to civil plan approval. o Condition 7 – RV Site Density Reduction Condition: Required the applicant to modify the site layout and reduce the total number of RV spaces as necessary to achieve compliance with PMC 25.160 standards related to spacing, open space, and internal circulation. o Condition 8 – Vehicle Turning Movement Condition: Required the applicant to provide turning movement diagrams demonstrating adequate circulation for recreational vehicles and emergency vehicles, subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Fire Department. o Condition 9 – Sight Distance Compliance Condition: Required the applicant to ensure that sight distance at the site entrance complied with PMC 25.160.070(3) by adjusting signage, fencing, landscaping, or other site features as necessary to maintain unobstructed visibility. o Condition 16 – Fire Hydrant Installation Condition: Required installation of a minimum of three internal fire hydrants along internal roadways at locations approved by the Fire Department, unless the Fire Marshal determined in writing that fewer hydrants were sufficient and permitted under the Pasco Municipal Code. o Condition 24 – Internal Roadway Design Condition: Required the applicant to limiting 25.160.070(5), with PMC comply internal system roadway revise the to one-way roads to areas with drive-through RV spaces and requiring compliant two- way altor circulation drivewhere access ernative -spaces not were through provided. Public Records: The City reports annually to the Washington State Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC) on its administration of public records requests. The five-year comparison that follows draws directly from those submissions and highlights trends in request volume, response times, staff costs program and effort, - core Office's Clerk's City the of one meaningful measure a of responsibilities. Staff will begin providing Council with pertinent public records data on a monthly basis. 1. Demand has more than doubled. Requests received grew from 589 in 2021 to 1,235 in 2025; a 110% increase. Page 158 of 166 6 2. Processing time has increased. Average days to disposition rose from 18 in 2021 to 21.4 days in 2025; median moved from 3 to 5 days. Staff attribute this to voluminous body- worn camera Office plus production, installment Clerk's requests email and requiring transitions. Requests closed within five days reduced from 64% of the total records received in 2021, and 57% in 2025. 3. Cost efficiency has improved. Total fulfillment cost in 2025 reached $420 thousand from $223 thousand in 2021; however, cost per request has fallen slightly. 4. Requester mix shifting. Law firm requests more than doubled from 112 to 247 and insurer requests nearly quintupled from 12 to 58, reflecting litigation-driven demand for police records. 5. No legal exposure. Zero PRA claims filed and $0 litigation costs in all five years. Interim Parks & Recreation Director, Angela Pashon Administration: Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Agenda: https://pasco.civicweb.net/document/355315/ Aquatics: Pasco Aquatic Center (PAC): • The first full month of PAC operations is complete, with strong community use and positive feedback. • Open swim sessions were at 300-person capacity and are now at 450. • The PAC reservation system has been streamlined, improving customer experience and reducing front-desk delays. • Party rooms and cabana rentals are up, showing increased demand for private group spaces. • A new slide for PAC has been approved for winter installation for use next summer, with design and procurement planning underway. Staffing & Training: • Lifeguard recruitment remains active; weekly onboarding and in-water skills checks continue. • Seasonal staff completed June safety refreshers focused on emergency communication and guest service excellence. • Four Assistant Guest Program Coordinators were onboarded, increasing efficiency and operations. Memorial Aquatic Park (MAP): • Session 3 of swimming lessons is now complete with strong participation and positive evaluations from families. Session 4 registration begins 7.23 • MAP parties and shelter rentals continue to trend upward, supporting community gatherings throughout July. • MAP will host the Inland Empire Swim Championships July 24–26, with teams from across the region expected. Recreation: General Information • Seeing new people in attendance at the 1st Ave Center. • Submitted final applications for the WWRP Local Parks Grant and the WWRP Trails Grant. Grant presentations will take place the week of August 17. • Road 80 Park building permit application has been submitted and is under review. • Memorial Park Playfields project preparing to go to bid. Page 159 of 166 7 • Farmers Market season is at the halfway point. Special Events • FIFA Fan Zone Events o July 1 & July 6 Final 2 games saw close to 1,000 attendees per game • Grand Old Fourth of July o Family Bike Ride - June 27 (75 participants) o Parade, Fireworks, Car Show, Etc. - July 4 Parade saw between 10,000 - 12,000 people in attendance to watch as well as 85+ parade entries Battle of the Bands saw over 750 people enjoy local HS bands compete for the sponsored $500 Prize. Memorial Park saw over 1,500 people throughout the day to participate in the pancake breakfast, farmers market, parade, post-parade festivities, and cardboard regatta at Memorial Pool. Fireworks display brought over 2,500 people out to Gesa Stadium and surrounding sports fields to enjoy. G04 parade staging and volunteer coordination – Tons of great feedback from community members, parade participants, and volunteers. Sponsorships GO4 Bike Ride: $500 In-kind Quake GO4 Bike Ride: $100 In-kind Bruchi’s GO4 Bike Ride: $190 In-kind Scotts Cycle and Sports GO4 Bike Ride: $80 In-kind Greenies • Prep and planning under way for Fall Events, Fiery Foods Festival, Spooky Hall, Winterfest and Lampson Cable Bridge Run. Adult Programs and Leagues • Adult Softball League - Second half of the season has begun. • Enhance Fitness class averaging approximately 20 participants each day. Youth Programs and Leagues • Session 1 of the summer After-School Program finished on July 17 (32 participants). Session 2 begins on July 27 (26 currently registered). • Junior Golf June classes complete (41 participants), July classes have started (17 participants). Reduced capacity in session 2 due to a loss of instructors. Tri -Cities Animal Services: • Update: All cats and kittens seized from a Kennewick apartment have been successfully rehomed. Several adult cats that were not well-suited for traditional adoption were placed through a barn cat program where they will provide natural rodent control for a local farm shop. • efficiency operational strengthen implemented to has restructuring Organizational been across Animal Control, Customer Service, Kennel Operations, and Veterinary Services. A key component of this effort was the transition to a full-time veterinarian, enhancing TCAS's capacity to provide timely, cost effective, medical care and support positive animal outcomes. With the new organizational structure now in place, the Interim Parks & Recreation Director and the Animal Services Manager are meeting with each workgroup to evaluate workflows, identify Page 160 of 166 8 operational efficiencies, assess training needs, and establish consistent service expectations. These efforts are intended to improve service delivery, strengthen staff development, and support the long-term sustainability of the regional animal services program. Monthly Stats • Current Animals in Care: 194 o Dogs: 46 o Cats: 148 • Animals Impounded: 308 o Dogs:143 o Cats:165 • Animals Outcomes: 387 o Dogs:141 o Cats: 246 • Animal Control Cases: 286 Community Outreach and Education • Weekly “Pet of Week” segments on KONA and KORD Radio Stations • “Pet of the Week” segments with Stevens Media Group bi-weekly • Fox Mornings “Pet of the Week” segments are weekly • Adopt a Friend Event at Columbia Gardens on June 27, 2026 Interim IT Director, Bill Crane Completed High-Level Projects: • Cisco Umbrella – DNS security and web filtering for internet traffic. o Initiative: Cybersecurity o This enhances network security through cloud-delivered DNS protection and web filtering. and content, malicious block detection, The improve to is goal threat enforce security policies across all devices, both on and off the network. Active Projects (In Progress) Community Services (Citizen-Facing) • Police Department Axon Fusus (99%) – Police Real-Time Crime Center platform integrating live video, AI insights, and public/private feeds. o Initiative: Community Safety o Status: Drone feed complete, working to address new items before project closure. • Gesa Stadium IT Infrastructure (99%) – New stadium IT build (access control, cameras, fiber, door systems). o Initiative: Quality of Life o Status: GESA will retain its existing door security system. Security access is configured, waiting on Ryan to confirm user access requirements. Citywide Initiatives: • Validated Architecture Design Review (VADR) (40% unchanged) – Addressing Cybersecurity issues in Pasco’s water infrastructure SCADA systems. o Initiative: Cybersecurity Page 161 of 166 9 o remediation ongoing. taken; actions Role of 14 Status: 35 - training is specific available in NeoGov. Awaiting IT Director input while continuing to evaluate PLC communication requirements pending a finalized IP address diagram. • AD Automation (60% unchanged) – Automating new employee account creation using New World data to speed up onboarding and reduce manual work. o Initiative: Automation & Process Improvement o Status: Active Directory group cleanup is in progress and remains a prerequisite for project completion. Security groups will be rebuilt to simplify permissions and improve clarity, service disruptions planning to minimize potential with careful during the transition. • Laserfiche Invoice Workflow (99% Hold) – “Scan and Toss” Account Payable (AP) workflow automation. o Initiative: Lean Process Improvement o Status: Project placed on hold per direction from Finance. Awaiting further direction from Finance. • Intune (75%) – Migrating SCCM tasks like computer update distribution, system compliance settings, and endpoint protection to Microsoft Intune (Autopilot, app deployment). o Initiative: Cloud & Endpoint Modernization o Status: PD phone migration to Intune is ongoing. Finance, HR, IT, and Municipal Court and Recreation next in line for with Parks enrolled, have been iPads migration. Departmental Support: • Barracuda (0% re-scope) – Managing Barracuda Message Archiver storage (currently 94% full). o Initiative: Storage & Compliance o Status: Storage utilization is currently at 94% following the Group 3 audit. Group 1 data remains largely retained per Archivist requirements, with additional reductions expected after upcoming Friday purge. The Barracuda appliance is anticipated to arrive next month to help improve capacity. • GIS Enterprise Server Geo-Database Migration (90% - Unchanged) – ESRI consulting to stabilize GIS infrastructure. o Initiative: GIS Optimization o Status: Finalizing the remaining layers, Pending Priority work on As-builts, Server upgrade to 11.5 is complete • HR Benefits Self Service Phase 2 (1%) –Evaluating an automation that will allow HR to send required employee benefits information to healthcare providers without manual entry. o Initiative: HR & Payroll Modernization o Status: Phase started, working with vendor to gain access to demo environment to begin further testing. Helpdesk Service Requests New Tickets Received: 172 Page 162 of 166 10 Tickets Resolved: 165 Currently Active: 209 Helpdesk Incident Requests New Tickets Received: 303 Tickets Resolved: 299 Currently Active: 271 Tickets by Department (% of Resolved) Community & Economic Development – 4.6% Executive - 4.9% Finance – 9.7% Fire – 5.5% Human Resources – 3.4% Information Technology – 22.7% Municipal Court – 3.2% Not Assigned – 9.7% Parks and Recreation – 19.8% Police Department – 9.1% Public Works – 7.4% IT Customer Satisfaction Survey Score: 99% System Metrics • Monthly Network Uptime – 100% Threat analytics: Malicious attacks • Total attempts: 1 • Total incidents: 1 Project Metrics • Active: 19 • Backlog: 2 • On Hold: 11 • Proposed: 7 Fire Chief, Kevin Crowley July 2026 (July 1 – July 22): Month Fire Calls Structure Fires Wildland Fires EMS Calls MVA’s Total Calls July 96 2 84 299 16 671 Community Engagement Events • FIFA World Cup Fan Zones (July 1st and 6th) • Attended the Home2 Suites by Hilton Ribbon Cutting Ceremony • Participated in 4th of July Parade Collaboration Page 163 of 166 11 • Attended (Chair) the Franklin County Emergency Management Board Meeting • Worked and Pasco PD to determine an alternate transit center, in the area of 20th and Court Street. Projects • IAFF Uniform Negotiations • Port of Pasco Airport Contract (ARFF Services) review and update Staffing • Made a conditional job offer for the Executive Administrative Assistant position Police Chief, Brent Cook Field Operations Division: • Successfully concluded the final two FIFA Fan Zone events on the 1st and 6th, continuing to engage with the community throughout the tournament. • Hosted a Business Watch meeting in District 1, strengthening partnerships with local businesses and addressing community concerns. • WASPCa event, Call Beyond the in Participated the -training dedicated sponsored to promoting positive stories and meaningful interactions between law enforcement and the communities they serve. • Hosted a Coffee with a Cop event on the 16th, providing another opportunity for residents to connect with officers, ask questions, and build relationships in an informal setting. Professional Standards Division: • Officer Todd Gilbert successfully completed his probationary period. • Officer Nathan Goddard successfully completed the Field Training Officer (FTO) program and has transitioned to solo patrol. • Hosted a departmental debrief regarding the Colombia aircraft crash. • Conducted Firearms and Defensive Tactics training for department personnel. • Completed officer wellness checks for all department members. Support Operations Division: • The department completed all requirements necessary to come into compliance with SB 6002. The ALPR system will be reactivated within the next week pending Chief Cook's approval. • SIU commanders finished a review of SIU SOPs and will soon present the updated version to Chiefs and Sheriffs. • Officer Jeremy Jones and Officer Jason McClintock were cleared by the Franklin County Prosecutor regarding the officer-involved shooting that occurred in March 2022. • Captain Parramore worked with the Washington State Auditor to successfully complete two audits on completed SIU cases. The findings will be forwarded to Chiefs and Sheriffs. • The Detective Unit investigated Juan G. Gomez for Rape of a Child in the First Degree. Detective Spitzer served as lead detective, with assistance from Detective Sweeney. The defendant 30a received convicted trial at was and -year-to-lifetimsentence, life e sex offender registration, lifetime community custody, and a 99-year No Contact Order. Page 164 of 166 Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re- investment in community infrastructure. City Council Goals QUALITY OF LIFE 2024-2025 Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services and programs. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system. COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK Implement targeted strategies to reduce crime through strategic investments in infrastructure, staffing, and equipment. COMMUNITY SAFETY Promote and encourage economic vitality. ECONOMIC VITALITY Identify opportunities to enhance City of Pasco identity, cohesion, and image. CITY IDENTITY Page 165 of 166 METAS DEL CONCEJO MUNICIPAL 2024-2025 Promover una alta calidad de vida a través de programas, servicios y inversion apropiada y reinversión en la comunidad infraestructura comunitaria. CALIDAD DE VIDA Promover viabilidad financiera a largo plazo, valor, y niveles de calidad de los servicios y programas. SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA Promover un sistema de transporte multimodal altamente funcional. RED DE TRANSPORTE DE LA COMUNIDAD Implementar estrategias específicas para reducir la delincuencia por medios de inversiones estratégicas en infraestructura, personal y equipo. SEGURIDAD DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica. VITALIDAD ECONOMICA Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la cohesión, y la imagen. IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA Page 166 of 166