HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026.07.20 Council Meeting Packet
AGENDA
City Council Regular Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, July 20, 2026
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar
Page
1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would
like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out
the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment)
to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings
must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this meeting.
To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-332-249-0718 and use access
code 114373633#
City Council meetings are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum at streamed and Richland and Pasco in Cable
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvliveand on the City’s Facebook page at
www.facebook.com/cityofPasco.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for
assistance.
Servicio de intéprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la
Secretaria Municipal dos dias antes para garantizar la disponiblidad.
request. upon provided (Spanish may service interpreter language be
Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure
availability.)
2. CALL TO ORDER
3. ROLL CALL
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
4. CONSENT AGENDA - All items listed under the Consent Agenda are
considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call
vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate
discussion these items. If further discussion is desired by of
Councilmembers, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the
Page 1 of 194
Regular Agenda and considered separately.
6 - 19 (a) Approval of Meeting Minutes for July 6th
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting
held on July 6, 2026, Regular Meeting.
20 - 21 (b) Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total
Amount of $8,281,420.02
$8,281,420.02 of amount total in claims approve To the
($3,146,521.03 in Check Nos. 279052 - 279470; $3,799,122.30 in
Electronic 853597 853860; - 853587, 853586 Nos. Transfer -
$13,487.80 in Check Nos. 55352 - 55390; $1,322,288.89 in
Electronic Transfer Nos. 30244815 - 30245560).
22 - 34 (c) Resolution No. 4764 - Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) Detour Agreement
To approve Resolution No. 4764, authorizing the City Manager to
execute Agency Haul Road/Detour Agreement with Washington State
Department of Transportation for their US 395 Kartchner St I/C NB
Ramp Terminal Improvements project.
35 - 38 (d) Planning Commission Appointment
To appoint Sonny Virakpanyou to Position No. 1 (term expiration date
12/31/2027) to the Planning Commission.
39 - 41 (e) LEOFF Disability Board Appointment
To appoint Jodi Christiansen to Position No. 3 (term expiration date
07/15/2028) to the LEOFF Disability Board.
42 - 48 (f) Pasco Public Facilities District Board Reappointment and
Appointment
To reappoint Marie Gillespie to Position No. 4 and appoint Craig
Maloney to Position No. 5 to the Pasco Public Facilities District Board
with both terms expiring on 07/15/2030.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS - The public may address Council on any items
unless it relates to a scheduled Public Hearing. This item is provided to
allow the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to
express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for
debate or for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate
response. Some questions require consideration by Council over time and
after a deliberative process with input from a number of different sources;
some questions are best directed to staff members who have access to
Page 2 of 194
specific information. Citizen comments will normally be limited to three
minutes each by the Mayor. Those with lengthy messages are invited to
summarize their comments and/or submit written information for
consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings. Lastly, when called
upon, the into residency county city or name your state please and
microphone before providing your comments.
7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS
(a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
8. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO
49 - 63 (a) Public Meeting & Resolution No. 4765 - Accepting a Notice of
Intent 10% Annexation Goodwin Annexation Commence to
Petition (ANX 2026-002) (5 minutes)
CONDUCT A PUBLIC MEETING
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4765, accepting the
Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation proceedings for the
Goodwin Annexation for Parcel No. 118180157 (Parcel 1 of AFN
456145), located south of Harris Road and north of Interstate 182,
southwest of the future Road 108 and Harris Road intersection, in
Section 18, Township 9 North, Range 29 E.W.M., establishing the
proposed whether determining boundary annexation and
simultaneous zoning and the assumption of bonded indebtedness will
be required.
64 - 82 (b) Public Hearing and Ordinance No. 4848 - R-15 and R-S-12
Frontage Improvement Code Amendments
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4848, amending Pasco
Municipal Code (PMC) Title 12.04 required sidewalk and driveway
improvements; Title 12.36 concurrency; and Title 21.15 complete
streets policy; and providing for severability and establishing an
effective date.
9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS
83 - 86 (a) Ordinance No. 4849 - Creating Chapter 3.31 of the Pasco
Municipal Code – Local Income Tax
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4849 creating a new
Chapter 3.31 of the Pasco Municipal Code entitled "Local Income
Tax," within title 3 "Revenue and Finance" of the Pasco Municipal
Page 3 of 194
Code, to oppose a local income tax on the residents and businesses
of the City of Pasco providing for severability and establishing an
effective date.
87 - 93 (b) Ordinance No. 4850 - Imposing a Six-Month Moratorium on
Licenses and Permits related to New Data Centers,
Cryptocurrency Mining Facilities, Blockchain Computing
Facilities and Artificial Intelligence Computing Facilities on
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4850, an ordinance of the
City of Pasco, Washington, imposing a six-month moratorium on the
acceptance and processing of business licenses and/or development
permit cryptocurrency centers, data applications to related new
mining facilities, blockchain computing facilities, artificial intelligence
computing computing facilities; high-density and facilities, other
setting forth preliminary findings in support of this moratorium;
declaring an emergency; establishing an immediate effective date;
authorizing directing to staff and only; summary by publication
develop and return to City Council with recommended land use
regulations addressing the permitting and licensing of these facilities
within six months of adoption of the moratorium.
94 - 106 (c) Resolution No. 4766 - Washington State University and the City
of Pasco for the Use of Body-Worn Camera Footage for
Research Purposes.
Motion: I move to approve Resolution No. 4766, authorizing the City
Manager to execute an Agreement between the City of Pasco and
Washington State University for the use of Pasco Police Department
body-worn camera footage for approved academic research
purposes.
107 - 111 (d) Resolution No. 4767 - Approval for Application to Public Works
Board for Pre-Construction Funding for Butterfield WTP Land
Acquisition
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.4767, authorizing the
submittal of a Public Works Board Pre-Construction Loan Application
for the Butterfield WTP Land Acquisition.
112 - 130 (e) Resolution No. 4768 – Right-of-Way Dedication and
Reimbursement Agreement
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4768, authorizing the
City Manager to execute right-of-way dedication and reimbursement
agreement Big Sky Developers LLC, a Washington Limited Liability
Company for additional right-of-way dedication along Convention
Drive.
131 - 137 (f) Resolution No. 4769 - Targeted Urban Area (TUA) Tax Exemption
Page 4 of 194
Program
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4769, declaring intent to
designate portions of the city’s industrial zones as a Targeted Urban
Area for the purpose of an industrial and manufacturing tax
exemption and establishing a public hearing on 7:00 p.m. on
Tuesday, September 8, 2026.
10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
138 - 180 (a) Agreement – Harris Road Realignment Agreement with VWA-
Pasco, LLC, ("Visconsi") for Broadmoor Development
MOTION: I move that the City Council authorize the City Manager to
execute the Harris Road Realignment Agreement with VWA-Pasco,
LLC., ("Visconsi") in substantially the form presented, with authority to
make minor administrative or non-substantive revisions as may be
necessary prior to execution.
11. NEW BUSINESS
12. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION
181 - 192 (a) City Manager Report
13. EXECUTIVE SESSION
14. ADJOURNMENT
15. ADDITIONAL NOTES
193 - 194 (a) Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only)
Page 5 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 13, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Gabriela Sanchez, City Clerk
City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Meeting Minutes for July 6th
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
July 6, 2026 Regular Meeting Minutes
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting held on
July 6, 2026, Regular Meeting.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 6 of 194
MINUTES
City Council Regular Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, July 6, 2026
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Charles Grimm, Mayor.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present:Abel Campos, Joe Cotta, Mark Figueroa,Calixto
Hernandez, Leo Perales, Davis Milne, Charles Grimm
Councilmembers attending remotely:
Councilmembers absent:
Staff present: Harold Stewart, City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager;
Angela Pashon, Interim Parks & Recreation Director; Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief;
Kevin Hebdon, Finance Director; Daniel Kenny, City Attorney; Craig Raymond,
Deputy Community & Economic Development Director; Brent Cook, Interim Police
Chief; Maria Serra, Public Works Director; Gabriela Sanchez, City Clerk and
Krystle Shanks, Deputy City Clerk
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Meeting Minutes for June 8th, June 15th, June 22nd and June
23rd
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Special Meeting held on June
8, 2026, Workshop Meeting held on June 8, 2026, Regular Meeting held on June
15, 2026, Workshop Meeting held on June 22, 2026 and Special Meeting held on
June 23, 2026.
Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of
$6,863,260.41 and Write-off Totaling $311,650.37
Page 1 of 13Page 7 of 194
To approve claims in the total amount of $6,863,260.41 ($3,173,328.28 in Check
Nos. 278803 - 279051; $2,342,177.84 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 853565 -
853569, 853574 - 853578, 853581 - 853585; $16,161.30 in Check Nos. 55315 -
55350; $1,331,592.99 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30244089 - 30244814).
To approve bad debt write-off for accounts receivable including Utility Billing,
Ambulance, Cemetery, General Accounts, and Miscellaneous Accounts in the
total amount of $311,650.37 and, of that amount, authorize $311,650.27 to be
turned over for collection.
Crash Prevention Zone Letter for the US 12 Corridor between "A" Street and Tank
Farm Road (5 min)
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Perales
To authorize the Mayor to submit a formal request to the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for designation of the US 12 Corridor
between "A" Street and Tank Farm Road as a Crash Prevention Zone.
RESULT: Motion carried 7-0
AYES: Mayor Grimm, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember
Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember
Campos
Resolution No. 4758 - Interagency Agreement with the Washington State Criminal
Justice Training Commission
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Perales
To approve Resolution No. 4758 authorizing the City Manager to execute an
interagency Justice Criminal State the between agreement Washington
Training Commission and the City of Pasco for the provision of facilities and
personnel support for the Basic Law Enforcement Academy.
RESULT: Motion carried 7-0
AYES: Mayor Grimm, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember
Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember
Campos
*Resolution No. 4762 - Setting a Date to Consider a Notice of Intent to
Commence Annexation Proceedings for Goodwin Annexation (ANX 2026-002)
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Perales
To approve Resolution No. 4762, setting 7:00 PM on July 20, 2026, as the time
and date for a public meeting with the initiators to consider the Goodwin Notice
of Intent to Commence Annexation for Parcel No. 118180157 (Parcel 1 of AFN
456145), located south of Harris Road and north of Interstate 182, southwest of
the future Road 108 and Harris Road intersection, in Section 18, Township 9
Page 2 of 13Page 8 of 194
North, Range 29 E.W.M.
RESULT: Motion carried 7-0
AYES: Mayor Grimm, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember
Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember
Campos
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Perales
To approve the Consent Agenda as read by roll call vote.
RESULT: Motion carried 7-0
AYES: Mayor Grimm, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember
Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember
Campos
PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Ken Pitky, expressed support for the proposed short-term rental ordinance and
thanked the Council and staff for their work developing a framework that balances
property rights with neighborhood protection. He requested clarification on whether a
separate business license would be required for each short-term rental property,
noting that long-term rental owners are not required to obtain multiple business
licenses. He also asked Council to reconsider or clarify the proposed good neighbor
policy, expressing concern that the one-hour response requirement for complaint may
be difficult to meet given existing law enforcement and code enforcement resources.
Lastly, he requested clarification regarding the inspection and certificate of inspection
requirements, including whether inspections would be required annually and how
those requirements compare to other residential rental properties. He reiterated his
support for the ordinance and encouraged further discussion and clarification of these
provisions.
Bob Mangione, spoke in support of the proposed short-term rental ordinance. He
thanked the council for considering the issue and expressed appreciation for the
community members, business leaders, and organizations in attendance supporting
the ordinance. He discussed the formation of the Columbia Basin STR Alliance,
describing its mission to promote responsible short-term rental operations through
advocacy, education, and stewardship. Mr. Mangione shared that health challenges
have prevented him from continuing full-time work in his family's contracting business,
making short-term rental income an important source of financial support. He stated
that the proposed ordinance would benefit responsible short-term rental operators,
local families, and small businesses, and encouraged the council to approve the
ordinance.
Page 3 of 13Page 9 of 194
Lynn, spoke in support of the proposed short-term rental ordinance. She shared that
following the death of her husband, her financial circumstances changed significantly.
She explained that the ability to operate a short-term rental in her longtime family
home could provide supplemental income, allowing her to remain in her home despite
being unable to work due to a disability. She encouraged the council to consider the
broader benefits of short-term rentals for homeowners facing financial hardship and
expressed her support for the ordinance.
Brad Goldberg, discussed the proposed development of approximately 90 acres
within to commitment development the team's He area. Broadmoor expressed
delivering a high-quality project and praised City staff for their professionalism and
collaboration throughout the infrastructure agreement process. Mr. Goldberg stated
that the team values Pasco's commitment to quality development and offered to
answer any questions from the council. The Mayor noted that discussion of the
infrastructure agreement would occur later in the meting and requested that Mr.
Goldberg leave his contact information in case follow-up questions arose.
Rich Sexton, spoke in support of the proposed short-term rental ordinance. Drawing
on his experience renting vacation homes in multiple states and countries, he stated
that short-term rental guests generally seek to be respectful neighbors and avoid
causing disturbances. He expressed his belief that responsible operators, guests, and
rental platforms share an interest in maintaining properties and neighborhoods, and
he encouraged the council to support the ordinance.
proposed She development. casino the Razo, opposition in spoke Katelyn to
expressed concern that increased access to gambling could contribute to gambling
addiction, financial hardship, and negative impacts on families and the community.
Ms. investments local support that prioritize Razo council the encouraged to
businesses, quality jobs, education, affordable housing, and family-friendly spaces,
and urged consideration of the long-term impacts on the community.
Marcie Torres, addressed the council regarding concerns she had previously raised
involving alleged harassment, public statements, and conduct by Mr. Perales and Mr.
David Cortina. She alleged that false information about her and her family had been
shared and child, minor her on about the concern expressed publicly, impact
requested that the city hold those accountable. Ms. Torres also raised concerns
regarding alleged misconduct related to grant application assistance for downtown
businesses and questioned the city's support of certain individuals during a recent 4th
of July parade.
LaWanda Hatch, spoke regarding concerns about the proposed casino development
and recent community events. She expressed appreciation for Pasco's family-oriented
character and support for local small businesses, stating that she did not believe a
casino aligned with the community's values. Ms. Hatch also raised concerns regarding
a recent law enforcement matter involving an individual's arrest and alleged release of
private information, requesting that the matter be investigated and emphasizing the
importance of constitutional rights, due process, and proper procedures.
Page 4 of 13Page 10 of 194
Robert "BJ" Olson, spoke in support of the proposed short-term rental ordinance on
behalf of Bob Mangione. He expressed support for a balanced approach that provides
additional lodging options for visitors, temporary workers, business travelers, and
families while establishing accountability and safety standards. Mr. Olsen stated that
short-term rentals serve a different market than traditional hotels and can help keep
visitors and their spending within the community. He also emphasized the importance
of property rights while noting that responsible regulations, including licensing,
permits, insurance, and neighborhood protections, provide an appropriate balance
between economic opportunity and community concerns.
Marie Redout, addressed the council regarding concerns related to family court
matters and the preservation of records. She requested that records and information
related to certain cases be maintained and reviewed, and expressed concerns about
court decisions involving children, protective orders, and restrictions she believes
were made without sufficient evidence. Ms. Redout stated that additional families
have asked her to share their experiences and emphasized the importance of
ensuring concerns are documented and addressed appropriately. She also raised
concerns remain should she information believed release the regarding of
confidential.
Iraseme Rojas, spoke in opposition to the proposed casino development. She shared
her personal experience growing up in the Tri-Cities and witnessing the impacts of a
family member's gambling addiction, including financial hardship and strain on family
relationships. Ms. Rojas expressed concern that expanding casino access could
negatively affect local families and encourage the council to carefully consider the
long-term community impacts before moving forward.
Amy Snow, addressed the council regarding concerns about her experiences with the
Pasco Police Department and the justice system. She stated that when reporting
incidents were concerns their felt family she and assistance, seeking and her
dismissed and that their safety concerns were not adequately addressed. Ms. Snow
shared examples involving a reported break-in and expressed concerns about feeling
unsupported requested greater She requesting police when assistance.
understanding and accountability to ensure community members feel heard,
protected, and supported when seeking help.
Tim Sanchez, spoke in support of the proposed short-term rental ordinance on behalf
of Bob Mangione and his family. He shared his positive experiences using short-term
rentals the and options, pet-friendly affordability, their travel, family for noting
relationships formed with responsible hosts. Mr. Sanchez stated that short-term
rentals families, and individuals for valuable supplemental provide can income
including members of his own community. He shared his support for Bob Mangione
and emphasized the importance of allowing responsible short-term rental
opportunities to help community members facing financial challenges.
Doug Gradin, addressed council regarding safety concerns at the intersection of
Highway 12 and Tank Farm Road. Mr Gradin shared his experience as a motorcycle
crash survivor at the intersection and urged the council to advocate for improvements
Page 5 of 13Page 11 of 194
to prevent future crashes. He expressed concerns about traffic conditions, including
truck movements and limited acceleration space, and requested that safety
council the that noted Mayor improvements delayed. be not hadThe already
approved sending a letter requesting state action regarding the intersection and
acknowledged the importance of addressing safety concerns at area intersections.
Mitch Snow, addressed council regarding concerns about receiving equal protection
and treatment under the law. He shared his background as a medically discharged
U.S. Army veteran and described his military service and injuries sustained during his
time in service. Mr. Snow expressed that he is seeking fair and equal treatment and
raised concerns regarding recent personal matters and interactions with local
government. The Mayor thanked Mr. Snow for his comments, noted the limited public
comment time, and offered to meet with him separately to discuss his concerns
further.
Celeste Francis Carlson Stanley, addressed the council regarding concerns related to
fireworks and ethics issues. She expressed concerns about potential conflicts of
interest involving councilmembers who have sold fireworks and requested that those
individuals recuse themselves from discussion related to fireworks. Ms. Stanley also
raised concerns regarding alleged harassment, retaliation, and disclosure of personal
information, and stated that she has legal counsel addressing those matters.
Matthew Ducat, spoke in support of the proposed short-term rental ordinance on
behalf of the Mangione family. He stated that he believes the opportunity would
benefit the Mangione family and the broader community, including families and
seniors who may benefit from additional income opportunities.
Laurie Thompson, addressed the council regarding several community issues. She
expressed opposition to a proposed casino development, citing concerns about the
impact of gambling on families and the community. Ms. Thompson also urged the
council to address ongoing concerns at Tri-Cities Animal Services, requesting
information regarding the appointment of a new police chief, and expressed frustration
with illegal fireworks during the Fourth of July. She encouraged the city to seek
additional assistance, including from the State of Washington, to improve enforcement
and reduce the impacts of illegal fireworks on the community.
Mayor Grimm called for public comments two (2) times and no one came forward to
speak.
REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS
Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
Councilmember Cotta reported attending a meeting with the Tri-City Regional
Chamber, where recommendations related to addressing homelessness were
discussed. He also commented on participating in the Fourth of July parade
celebrating the nation's 250th anniversary and noted that interviews for boards
and commissions were scheduled for Wednesday.
Page 6 of 13Page 12 of 194
Councilmember Hernandez reported participating in the Fourth of July parade and
serving as a judge for the Mayor's Choice award at the community car show. He
noted to opportunity appreciated and the were events both that enjoyable
participate in the community celebrations.
Councilmember Perales reported attending a meeting with the Tri-City Regional
Chamber, discussed. also He were where and homelessness development
hosted a community meeting regarding Tri-Cities Animal Services, attended by
approximately 40 residents, and noted that additional meetings are planned.
Councilmember Perales assisted the Fourth of July parade and thanked Captain
Parramore for promptly addressing a resident's concerns regarding a homeless
encampment. During his report, he commented on the importance of respectful
public participation, encouraged factual discussion during public comment, and
responded to statements made during the meeting regarding allegations directed
toward elected officials. A point of order was raised during his remarks, after
which he concluded his report.
Mayor Pro Tem Milne thanked City staff for organizing the meeting with the Tri-
City Regional Chamber, noting the productive discussion and expressing interest
in community also He other organizations. meetings similar holding with
commented on the success of the Fourth of July parade, thanking attendees,
fellow councilmembers, and community members for their participation.
Mayor Grimm thanked the council for covering his responsibilities during his
illness and brief absence.
Councilmember Figueroa reported that the Fourth of July parade and Gesa
Stadium fireworks celebration were successful community events that brought
residents together. He also recognized Parks and Recreation staff for providing
alternative activities, including a movie option at Fairchild Cinemas, for residents
seeking to avoid fireworks. Councilmember Figueroa expressed appreciation for
staff's while the of needs community the accommodate to efforts diverse
supporting family-friendly events.
Councilmember Campos highlighted the recent meeting with the Pasco Chamber,
expressing appreciation for the opportunity to engage with local business leaders
and community strengthening to council's the emphasizing commitment
partnerships. He also commented on the success of the Fourth of July parade,
noting the strong community participation and celebrating the opportunity to
recognize both the nation and the Pasco community.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Perales
to push item 9 (b) Ordinance No. 4847 - Regulations for Short-Term Rentals
next in the agenda.
RESULT: Motion carried 7-0
AYES: Mayor Grimm, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember
Page 7 of 13Page 13 of 194
Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember
Campos
Ordinance No. 4847 - Regulations for Short-Term Rentals
Deputy City Manager Sigdel presented Ordinance No. 4847, establishing a
regulatory framework for short-term rentals as directed by the City Council. The
proposed license business city obtain a operators requires ordinance to
endorsement and a short-term rental permit for each property, designate a local
representative available to respond to complaints, maintain liability insurance as
required by state law, and complete an annual safety self-certification in lieu of
city inspections. The ordinance also prohibits event type uses, such as weddings
and large gatherings, and applies to all short-term rental operators regardless of
booking platform. Staff noted that permit fees would be developed later in the
year, with the ordinance proposed to take effect January 1, 2027. Additional land
use code amendments will be brought forward through the Comprehensive Plan
update process to clarify where short-term rentals are permitted.
Councilmembers discussed permit requirements, complaint response procedures,
self-certification, coordination with rental platforms, parking, and neighborhood
concerns. Staff clarified the city would enforce its own municipal code but would
not enforce homeowners' association (HOA) regulations, which remain private
civil matters. Councilmembers expressed support for maintaining a simple, limited
regulatory framework focused on safety, accountability, and property rights while
addressing neighborhood concerns. Overall, councilmembers indicated support
for the ordinance, stating it provides an appropriate balance between short-term
rentals and ensuring responsible operation.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Perales
to adopt Ordinance No. 4847, creating Chapter 5.120 Short-Term Rentals of
the Pasco Municipal Code establishing a clear regulatory framework for short-
term rentals within the City of Pasco, with an effective date of January 1, 2027.
RESULT: Motion carried 7-0
AYES: Mayor Grimm, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember
Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember
Campos
HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
RELATING THERETO
Essential Public Facilities (EPF), Secure Community Transition Facilities
(SCTFs), and Less Restrictive Alternative (LRA) Housing Code Update
The City Attorney explained that, based on previous Council direction, staff and
Page 8 of 13Page 14 of 194
legal counsel are revising the proposed ordinance to incorporate additional
changes, including evaluating an overlay district that would limit certain facilities to
industrial areas. Because this work requires further analysis and coordination with
the comprehensive plan and zoning code updates, the ordinance is not yet ready
for consideration. The City Attorney advised that the public hearing scheduled for
the current draft ordinance was no longer necessary, as a revised ordinance will
be presented at a future public hearing to allow for public comment. He also noted
that the existing moratorium on accepting applications is set to expire in August
and recommended extending it for an additional six months to allow staff time to
complete the ordinance revisions while maintaining the current restrictions.
Councilmembers asked clarifying questions regarding the public hearing process
and confirmed that public input received would help inform the revised ordinance.
Additional discussion reiterated Council's previous direction to evaluate limiting
less address to order areas in to housing alternative restrictive industrial
community concerns while complying with state requirements.
The Mayor then opened the public hearing for public testimony on the matter.
LaWanda location a of potential less about concern expressed Hatch, the
restrictive alternative housing facility near her rural neighborhood. She stated that
the area is a quiet, family-oriented farming community and raised questions about
public safety, emergency response times, facility security measures, and the
potential impacts on nearby residents. She also requested additional information
regarding how the facility would operate, including security, resident movement,
and traffic impacts.
Stephen Bauman thanked the council and staff for their work on the issue of less
restrictive housing for sexually violent predators. He expressed concerns about
the potential placement of such housing in the community. referencing a proposed
facility in Kennewick with five occupants and citing a high recidivism rate for
sexually violent predators. Stephen stated that the County is also discussing the
issue and expressed appreciation for the Council's attention to the matter,
emphasizing and collaboration continued community importance the of
discussion.
Mayor Grimm called for public comments two (2) times and no one came forward
to speak.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS
Resolution Nos. 4759, 4760, 4761 - Surplus of City Properties (112042336,
112042245, 112034263 & 112041282)
Staff presented a proposal to declare three city-owned downtown properties
surplus purposes. municipal for needed are no they because The longer
properties include 122–124 S. 4th Avenue, 321 W. Lewis Street, and 414 W.
Page 9 of 13Page 15 of 194
Columbia Street. Staff explained each property's acquisition history and stated
that surplus designation would allow the City to market the sites through a
Request for Proposals (RFP) process to encourage redevelopment aligned with
the Council's goals for economic growth and downtown revitalization. Proposals
will be evaluated based on factors beyond purchase price, including proposed
use, community benefit, and the applicant's experience and financial capacity.
During Council discussion, members expressed interest in including a Council
representative on the proposal evaluation committee, with Councilmember
Hernandez volunteering to serve. Council also discussed the former Thunderbird
site, noting that while it had previously been considered for a parking lot,
increased costs due to new electric vehicle charging requirements and the
potential private seek first to commercial prompted redevelopment for staff
development proposals. Staff confirmed that the evaluation committee will make
recommendations, with the final decision remaining with the full Council.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Perales
to approve Resolution No 4759., approving the surplus of certain City-owned
real property located along Lewis Street, Parcel No. 112034263.
RESULT: Motion carried 7-0
AYES: Mayor Grimm, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember
Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember
Campos
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Perales
to approve Resolution No. 4760, approving the surplus of certain City-owned
real 112042236 Nos. Parcel Avenue, and along located property 4th
112042245.
RESULT: Motion carried 7-0
AYES: Mayor Grimm, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember
Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember
Campos
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Cotta to
approve Resolution No. 4761, approving the surplus of certain City-owned real
property located along Columbia Street, Parcel No. 112041282.
RESULT: Motion carried 7-0
AYES: Mayor Grimm, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember
Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember
Campos
Resolution No. 4763 Regarding State and Local Personal Income Taxes
Page 10 of 13Page 16 of 194
Staff presented a resolution expressing the City Council's opposition to a state
income tax and, at Council's previous direction, also brought forward a previously
drafted ordinance related to the issue. Councilmembers discussed the resolution
and ordinance, with several expressing support for both as a way to state the
City's position and require future Council action before any local income tax could
be considered. The City Attorney advised that while an ordinance could be
adopted, it would be largely symbolic because it would not legally bind future
councils and could be repealed if a future council chose to pursue such a tax.
During discussion, Councilmember Figueroa stated he supported the resolution
but emphasized the importance of continuing conversations about tax fairness.
He noted concerns about Washington's tax structure disproportionately impacting
lower- and middle-income households and encouraged future discussions on
creating a more equitable tax system while acknowledging that the resolution
itself would not address those broader issues.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Perales
to approve Resolution No. 4763 expressing the City of Pasco's opposition to
state and local personal income taxes in Washington State.
RESULT: Motion carried 7-0
AYES: Mayor Grimm, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Figueroa, Councilmember Perales, Councilmember
Cotta, Councilmember Hernandez, and Councilmember
Campos
NEW BUSINESS
Presentation - Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation Pasco
Economic Development Project Update
Cody and Council Business Chairman, Erickson, Jarred-Michael Colville
Desautel, Executive Director, Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation will
provide an informational presentation on the history, vision, and current status of
the Pasco Economic Development Project.
Representatives of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation provided
an update on their proposed Pasco economic development project, including the
planned casino and hotel development. They explained that progress has been
delayed due to the federal fee-to-trust approval process and changes in the
federal administration but emphasized their continued commitment to the project.
The of economic creating goals presentation the highlighted project's
opportunities, generating revenue to support tribal services, preserving tribal
culture, creating an estimated 2,000 jobs, and fostering partnerships with the City
of Pasco and other local agencies. Tribal representatives also discussed existing
agreements and related to municipal services, public safety, infrastructure,
Page 11 of 13Page 17 of 194
community investment, including provisions to share gaming revenues with local
communities.
Councilmembers thanked the tribe for the update and expressed appreciation for
its longstanding partnership with the City. Discussion included the project's
federal approval process, relationships with neighboring tribes, potential economic
benefits, and ongoing communication with the City. Councilmembers also raised
questions and concerns regarding traffic, public safety, infrastructure costs, social
impacts associated with gambling, and ensuring adequate mitigation measures
and community investment. Tribal representatives stated they remain committed
to working collaboratively with the City, providing future project updates, and
addressing community concerns as the project moves through the federal review
process.
MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION
Agreement – Harris Road Realignment Agreement with VWA-Pasco, LLC,
("Visconsi") for Broadmoor Development
Staff presented a preview of a proposed development agreement with Visconsi
Development Group for the Broadmoor area, noting that the item will return for
Council action at the next regular meeting. The agreement outlines the City's
commitment to relocate Harris Road to improve long-term traffic circulation and
support the area's overall transportation plan. The project is eligible for funding
through the previously approved transportation impact fee (TIF) program, with the
developer paying its proportional share of the costs. The agreement also includes
a cost-sharing provision for construction cost overruns to reduce the City's
financial risk.
Councilmembers did not raise questions during the presentation. The Mayor
expressed support for the project, noting that the development is expected to
generate future City revenue and attract businesses that residents have identified
as desired additions to the community.
City Manager's Report
The City Manager provided updates on recent City activities, including Fourth of
July events, thanking Police, Fire, and Public Information staff for their efforts in
public safety, education, and community outreach. He highlighted strong
attendance at holiday events, continued high usage at the Pasco Aquatic Center,
upcoming community activities such as Movies on the Lawn, National Night Out,
Business Watch, and Coffee with a Cop, and noted ongoing improvements at the
aquatic facility to address operational and mechanical issues.
During Council discussion, members requested additional fireworks enforcement
Page 12 of 13Page 18 of 194
data and discussed concerns regarding the use of illegal fireworks, increased
calls for service, and community expectations for enforcement. Councilmembers
emphasized the importance of balancing education and enforcement while
recognizing the significant workload placed on police and fire personnel during
the holiday. The Mayor concluded by sharing positive comments from visitors who
praised Pasco's hospitality and Fourth of July celebrations, thanking City staff and
residents for fostering a welcoming community.
They Mayor called for a 5 minute recess at 9:42pm before they begin Executive
Session at 9:47pm.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Council adjourned into Executive Session at 9:47 PM for 30 minutes returning at
10:17 PM to discuss with legal counsel about current or potential litigation per
RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) with the City Manager, Deputy City Manager, and City
Attorney.
At 10:17 PM Mayor Grimm announced that the Executive Session would continue
for another 15 minutes or until 10:33 PM.
At 10:33 PM Mayor Grimm announced that the Executive Session would continue
for another 10 minutes or until 10:44 PM.
Mayor Grimm called the meeting back to order at 10:44 PM.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:44 PM.
PASSED and APPROVED on _______________________.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
David Milne, Mayor Gabriela Sanchez, City Clerk
Page 13 of 13Page 19 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 10, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Kevin Hebdon, Director
Finance
SUBJECT: Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of
$8,281,420.02
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Accounts Payable 06.18.26 to 07.08.26
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve claims in the total amount of $8,281,420.02 ($3,146,521.03 in
Check Nos. 279052 - 279470; $3,799,122.30 in Electronic Transfer Nos.
853586 - 853587, 853597 - 853860; $13,487.80 in Check Nos. 55352 - 55390;
$1,322,288.89 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30244815 - 30245560).
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 20 of 194
REPORTING PERIOD:
July 20, 2026
Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'l Bank Electronic Bank Combined
Check Numbers 279052 - 279470 55352 - 55390
Total Check Amount $3,146,521.03 $13,487.80 Total Checks 3,160,008.83$
Electronic Transfer Numbers 853586 - 853587 30244815 - 30245560
853597 - 853860
Total EFT Amount $3,799,122.30 $1,322,288.89 $0.00 $0.00 Total EFTs 5,121,411.19$
Grand Total 8,281,420.02$
Councilmember B
100 1,020,873.26
110 104,053.89
140 2,000.00
142 185,226.58
145 2,042.62
150 193,204.52
160 5,886.81
165 9,778.97
168 46,728.52
169 903.00
170 607.06
180 2,162.94
185 2,108.15
188 85,929.06
190 144.82
194 39,246.80
195 1,343.71
196 HOTEL/ MOTEL EXCISE TAX 10,000.00
367 444,662.83
410 3,284,136.36
510 30,990.48
515 26.25
520 464,871.67
630 2,308.43
690 2,342,183.29
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS:8,281,420.02$
June 18 2026 to July 8 2026
C I T Y O F P A S C O
Council Meeting of:
Accounts Payable Approved
The City Council
City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington
We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as
described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such claim.
Harold Stewart, City Manager Kevin Hebdon, Finance Manager
We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this
20th day of July 2026 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment:
C.D. BLOCK GRANT
HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT
MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER
AMBULANCE SERVICE
Councilmember A
SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND:
GENERAL FUND
STREET
MULTI-MODAL FACILITY
RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LODGING
REVOLVING ABATEMENT
CEMETERY
ATHLETIC PROGRAMS
ANIMAL CONTROL
AQUATIC CENTER - PPFD
SENIOR CENTER OPERATING
UTILITY, WATER/ SEWER
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL
MEDICAL/ DENTAL/ VISION INSURANCE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STADIUM/ CONVENTION CENTER
GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
FLEX
PAYROLL CLEARING
Page 21 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 23, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Maria Serra, Public Works Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4764 - Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT) Detour Agreement
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution 4764
Agency Haul Road/Detour Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION:the authorizing 4764, No. I approve to move City Resolution
Manager to execute Agency Haul Road/Detour Agreement with Washington
State Department of Transportation for their US 395 Kartchner St I/C NB Ramp
Terminal Improvements project.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A - This is a WSDOT project, partially funded by proportionate shares
collected from developers.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Background
A temporary detour is required to construct improvements to the Kartchner St.
Interchange (in the vicinity of the NB Ramp Terminal). This project is led by
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). The US 395
Kartchner St. I/C NB Ramp Terminal Improvements project includes addition of
a is and St Kartchner at roundabout terminal ramp this at intersection
anticipated to be constructed in 2026, with construction starting as early as
August. The detour is required for construction of portions of the roundabout at
the intersection of Kartchner St. and the US 395 northbound ramp terminal.
This project is partially funded by developer's proportionate share contributions,
which were transferred from the City to WSDOT in May of 2025, for a total
Page 22 of 194
contribution of $218,280. Total estimated project cost is approximately $1.65
million.
The project footprint is all within WSDOT jurisdiction with the exception of the
temporary detour, as proposed in the agreement, to maintain access to local
businesses through the use of segments of city owned streets. The Detour will
utilize the following city streets: Kartchner St., Capitol Ave, Hillsboro St., and
Commercial Ave during construction of the project.
The proposed detour is anticipated to take approximately 15 working days (3
weeks) based on WSDOT's scheduling estimation.
The proposed detour agreement identifies WSDOT being responsible for
maintenance and repairs of City streets utilized as part of the detour when
specifically attributed to the project use. WSDOT will be responsible for
ensuring those streets are restored to the baseline condition as part of the
agreement. Baseline will be established via a pre-construction inspection.
Impact (other than fiscal)
As with most construction detours, there is a temporary inconvenience and
minor delays in travel time introduced in order to get around the work zone.
Since WSDOT will be responsible for ensuring the pavement and striping
conditions are returned to baseline conditions on City streets associated with
the detour, additional impact may include repair work occurring on those City
streets after the improvements at the interchange ramp are completed. This
work may introduce additional temporary traffic control setups, including
another temporary short-term detour, as needed. This work mitigates any
long-lasting impacts to the local network.
The ultimate benefit of an improved intersection, with a focus on addressing
safety and congestion at this location outweighs the temporary inconvenience
of one-time construction.
V. DISCUSSION:
Recommendation
This item was presented to Council at the July 13, 2026 Workshop as a
discussion item.
Staff recommends approval of the Agency Haul Road/Detour Agreement with
WSDOT.
Constraints
WSDOT's project is getting close to construction phase, and the project will be
Page 23 of 194
constructed in 2026. It is typical to have temporary traffic control and/or detours
when converting existing intersections into roundabouts.
Next Steps
After approval and execution of the agreement, staff will continue coordination
with WSDOT regarding to schedule and timing of this detour taking place.
Alternatives
The Council may choose to deny approval of the agreement. In that case,
WSDOT would consider a reconfiguration of the traffic control plan, resulting in
bigger impacts to traffic at this intersection during construction.
Page 24 of 194
Resolution – WSDOT Haul Road/Detour ILA - 1
Version 1.9.26
RESOLUTION NO. ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGENCY HAUL
ROAD/DETOUR AGREEMENT BETWEEN WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (WSDOT) AND THE CITY OF
PASCO.
WHEREAS, WSDOT is administering a project at US 395/Kartchner Street interchange
northbound ramp terminal; and
WHEREAS, the project includes construction of a new roundabout at the existing
intersection of Kartchner Street and Commercial Avenue, which is currently a two-way stop
controlled intersection; and
WHEREAS, the footprint of the project is entirely within WSDOT jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, construction of the project requires a temporary detour of traffic to provide
access to the local businesses in this vicinity; and
WHEREAS, the proposed detour utilizes segments of City streets, including Capitol
Avenue, Hillsboro Street, Commercial Avenue, and Kartchner Street; and
WHEREAS, WSDOT shall be responsible only for the maintenance and repairs of city’s
roads specifically attributable to the project use and those will be restored to their Baseline
Condition, which is established prior to starting the project construction; and
WHEREAS, of due after Pasco, Washington, has City the of Council City the
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into the Agency
Haul Road/Detour Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the Agency
Haul Road/Detour Agreement between WSDOT and the City of Pasco; a copy of which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 1; and
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to sign and execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of
Pasco.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 25 of 194
Resolution – WSDOT Haul Road/Detour ILA - 2
Version 1.9.26
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of
________________, 20__.
Charles Grimm
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Gabriela Sanchez Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 26 of 194
Agency Haul
Road/Detour Agreement
Agency and Address
Agreement Number
State Route Number Control Section Number
Section / Location
Region
Intended Use (Haul Road or Detour Road)
Vehicle Restrictions
Description of Roads or Streets
This Agreement is between the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the above-named
governmental entity (Agency) hereinafter referred to individually as the Party and collectively as the Parties.
Recitals
1. WSDOT is planning the construction or improvement of a section of state highway as shown above;
2. WSDOT plans to use the Agency roads or streets described above and as further detailed in red on the attached
Exhibit “A” for detour routes or for hauling purposes during construction of the project, and
3. It is anticipated that use of the Agency’s roads or streets for such purposes will result in the need for additional
maintenance work on the roads or streets, the cost of which should be borne by WSDOT.
Now Therefore, pursuant to chapter RCW 47.28.140 and in consideration of the terms, conditions, and performances
contained herein, the recitals as stated above which are incorporated and made a part hereof, and any Exhibits attached
hereto, it is mutually agreed as follows:
1. PURPOSE
1.1 The Agency hereby agrees to WSDOT’s use of the roads or streets covered by this Agreement subject to the
conditions contained herein.
1.2 Immediately prior to the beginning of WSDOT’s use of the roads or streets, the Parties shall make a joint condition
inspection. WSDOT shall prepare a “Memorandum” of the existing condition of said roads or streets, attached
hereto as Exhibit B. The Memorandum shall include a statement of the extent and frequency of routine maintenance
operations normally carried out by the Agency, shall contain an explanation of any repair or maintenance required
prior to WSDOT’s use, and may include photographs showing condition of the existing roadway. The Memorandum
shall establish the “Baseline Condition” of the roads or streets that are the subject of this Agreement.
1.3 In the event that the Memorandum establishes the need for the repair or maintenance of the roads or streets prior to
WSDOT’s use, the Parties shall prepare an addendum to the Memorandum that provides a detailed description of
work to be performed and division of responsibilities for performance of the work. Any repair or maintenance of the
roads and streets prior to WSDOT’s use shall be documented in the addendum to the Memorandum.
1.4 The Agency agrees not to restrict the legal size, weight, or speed of vehicles using the roads or streets covered by
this Agreement except as stated above under Vehicle Restrictions.
DOT Form 224-014
Revised 09/2023
Page 1 of 4
City of Pasco
525 N. 3rd Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
HR5-1004
US 395 1101
US 395/Kartchner Street interchange northbound ramp terminal at milepost
23.69
South Central Region
Detour Road
N/A
The work proposed under this Agreement is to provide access to the local
businesses on North Commercial Ave. through the use of Kartchner St., North
Capitol Ave., East Hillsboro St., and North Commercial Ave.
Page 27 of 194
1.5 It is expressly understood that WSDOT shall be responsible only for the maintenance and repairs of the Local
streets covered by this Agreement the Parties will conduct a joint inspection to identify any damage to the roads
or streets occasioned by WSDOT’s use thereof. The Baseline Condition as established in the Memorandum, and
any addendum thereto, will be used for purposes of comparison. The Parties shall document the need for repair
or maintenance of the roads or streets based on WSDOT’s use and shall determine the cost of the required
maintenance and repair to restore the roads or streets to the Baseline Condition.
1.6 WSDOT shall reimburse the Agency for the actual direct and related indirect costs of the required maintenance
and repairs to restore the roads or streets to the Baseline Condition or WSDOT shall complete the repair to the
satisfaction of the Agency.
1.7 When indicated by a check mark in the box the Agency is a county, WSDOT and the Agency acknowledge that
2. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
Subject to its other provisions, the period of performance of this Agreement shall commence on and
be completed on unless terminated sooner as provided in this Agreement or extended through a
properly executed amendment.
3. LEGAL RELATIONS
any other Party. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement.
3.2 The Parties shall be deemed independent contractors for all purposes, and the employees of the Parties or any of
their contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and the employees thereof, shall not in any manner be deemed to be
employees of the other Party.
4. INDEMNIFICATION
4.1 To the extent allowable under law, each Party to this Agreement will protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless
such, from any and all costs, claims, judgments, and/or awards of damages (both to persons and property), arising
out of, or in any way resulting from, each Party’s negligent acts or omissions with respect to the provisions of this
Agreement. Neither Party will be required to indemnify, defend, or save harmless the other Party if the claim, suit, or
action for injuries, death, or damages (both to persons and property) is caused by the sole negligence of the other
or employees, and/or involve those actions covered by RCW 4.24.115, the indemnity provisions provided herein
employees.
4.2 The Parties agree that their obligations under this section extend to any claim, demand, and/or cause of action
mutual negotiation, hereby waive, with respect to each other only, any immunity that would otherwise be available
against such claims under the Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW.
5. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
5.1 The Parties shall work collaboratively to resolve disputes and issues arising out of, or related to, this Agreement.
Disagreements shall be resolved promptly and at the lowest level of hierarchy. To this end, following the dispute
of or related to this Agreement. The representatives shall communicate regularly to discuss the status of the
the performance of this Agreement and the resolution of any disputes or issues arising during the term of this
Agreement.
DOT Form 224-014
Revised 09/2023
Page 2 of 4
August 3rd, 2026
October 31st, 2026
Page 28 of 194
5.1.2. A Party’s representative shall notify the other Party in writing, with email being acceptable, of any dispute or
issue that they believe may require formal resolution. The representatives shall meet within five (5) working
days of receiving the written notice and attempt to resolve the dispute.
5.1.3. In the event the representatives cannot resolve the dispute or issue, the Agency Public Works Director
and WSDOT’s Region Administrator, or their respective designees, shall meet and engage in good faith
negotiations to resolve the dispute.
5.1.4. In the event the Agency and WSDOT cannot resolve the dispute or issue, the Agency and WSDOT shall
each appoint a member to a Dispute Board. These two members shall then select a third member not
affiliated with either Party. The three-member board shall conduct a dispute resolution hearing that shall be
informal and unrecorded. All expenses for the third member of the Dispute Board shall be shared equally by
both Parties; however, each Party shall be responsible for its own costs and fees.
6. RECORDS AND AUDIT
All records related to the Work performed under this Agreement shall be held and kept available for inspection and audit
for a period of six (6) years from the date of termination of this Agreement or any final payment authorized under this
Agreement, whichever is later. Each Party shall have full access to and right to examine said records, during normal
business hours and as often as it deems necessary. In the event of litigation or claim arising from the performance of this
Agreement, the Agency and WSDOT agree to maintain the records and accounts until such litigation, appeal or claims are
finally resolved. This section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
7. TERMINATION
7.1 This Agreement may be terminated, without penalty or further liability as follows:
7.1.1 Termination for Convenience
This Agreement may be terminated for convenience by WSDOT at any time. The notice of intent to terminate for
convenience shall be issued in writing no less than thirty (30) working days in advance of termination. WSDOT shall
not be liable to the Agency for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages arising solely from termination of this
Agreement.
7.1.2 Termination for Cause
This Agreement may be terminated for cause by either Party if the other Party does not fulfill in a timely and proper
manner its obligations under this Agreement, or if the other Party violates any of the terms and conditions of this
Agreement. The notice of intent to terminate for cause shall be issued by a Party in writing and the other Party shall
have the opportunity to correct the violation or failure within fifteen (15) working days of the date of the notice. If the
failure or violation is not corrected within the time allowed, this Agreement will automatically terminate.
7.1.3 Termination for Withdrawal of Authority
This Agreement may be terminated by WSDOT in the event that WSDOT’s authority to perform any of its duties
is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way after the commencement of this Agreement. The notice of intent to
terminate for withdrawal of authority shall be issued by WSDOT in writing no less than seven (7) calendar days in
advance of termination. No penalty shall accrue to WSDOT in the event termination under this section is exercised.
This section shall not be construed to permit WSDOT to terminate this Agreement in order to acquire similar
services from a third-party.
7.1.4 Termination for Non-Allocation of Funds
This Agreement may be terminated by either Party if insufficient funds are allocated or appropriated to the Party to
continue its performance of this Agreement in any future period. The notice of intent to terminate for non-allocation
of funds shall be issued in writing no less than seven (7) calendar days in advance of termination.
7.2 Any termination of this Agreement shall not prejudice any rights or obligations accrued to the Parties prior
to termination.
8. GENERAL
8.1 Assurances. The Parties agree that all activity pursuant to this Agreement shall be in accordance with all applicable
federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations as they currently exist or as amended.
DOT Form 224-014DOT Form 224-014
Revised 09/2023Revised 09/2023
DOT Form 224-014DOT Form 224-014
Revised 09/2023Revised 09/2023
DOT Form 224-014DOT Form 224-014
Revised 09/2023Revised 09/2023
DOT Form 224-014DOT Form 224-014
Revised 09/2023Revised 09/2023
Page 3 of 4 Page 29 of 194
8.2 Interpretation. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the state of Washington. The titles
to paragraphs and sections of this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect on the construction
or interpretation of any part hereof.
8.3 Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by the mutual written agreement of the Parties executed by
personnel authorized to bind each of the Parties.
8.4 Waiver. A failure by a Party to exercise its rights under this Agreement shall not preclude that Party from the
subsequent exercise of such rights and shall not constitute a waiver of any other rights under this Agreement unless
stated to be such in writing and signed by an authorized representative of the waiving Party and attached to the
original Agreement.
8.5 All Writings Contained Herein. This Agreement contains all of the terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties.
No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist
or to bind the Parties.
8.6 Venue. The Venue of any action brought under this Agreement involving WSDOT shall be in Superior Court for
County, State of Washington.
8.7 Severability. If any term or condition of this Agreement is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of
the other terms or conditions of this Agreement.
8.8 Authority to Bind. The signatories to this Agreement represent that they have the authority to bind their respective
organizations to this Agreement.
9. COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts or in duplicate originals. Each counterpart or each duplicate shall be
deemed an original copy of this Agreement signed by each Party, for all purposes. Electronic signatures or signatures
transmitted via email in portable document format (“PDF”) may be used in place of original signatures on this Agreement.
Each Party intends to be bound by its electronic or PDF signature on this Agreement and is aware that the other Party is
relying on its electronic or PDF signature.
In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the party’s date signed last below.
AGENCY
By:
Printed:
Title:
Date:
WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
Printed:
Title:
Date:
DOT Form 224-014DOT Form 224-014
Revised 09/2023Revised 09/2023
DOT Form 224-014DOT Form 224-014
Revised 09/2023Revised 09/2023
DOT Form 224-014DOT Form 224-014
Revised 09/2023Revised 09/2023
DOT Form 224-014DOT Form 224-014
Revised 09/2023Revised 09/2023
Page 4 of 4 Page 30 of 194
HR5-1004
Exhibit A
Sheet 1 of 2
AGREEMENT HR5-1004
CITY OF PASCO
EXHIBIT “A”
SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS
The work proposed under this Agreement includes a detour to maintain access to local
businesses through the use of Kartchner St., North Capitol Ave., East Hillsboro St., and North
Commercial Ave. during the US 395/Kartchner St. I/C – Northbound ramp Terminal
Improvements Project in the City of Pasco in Franklin County, Washington.
Short Term Detour Route Details
Portions of the intersection of Kartchner St. and the US 395 northbound ramp terminal will be
closed, depending on the phase of construction, limiting specific movements and requiring
motorists to follow the posted detour to access local businesses.
The detour will consist of the use of Kartchner St. between the US 395 northbound ramp
terminal and North Capitol Ave, the use of North Capitol Ave. between Kartchner St. and East
Hillsboro St., the use of East Hillsboro St. between North Capitol Ave. and North Commercial
Ave., and the use of North Commercial Ave. between East Hillsboro St. and Kartchner St.
In accordance with Section 1.6 of the Agreement, pavement repairs will be made by WSDOT’s
contractor once usage of the detour route has ceased and will be completed by the end of the
contract. The City of Pasco will not seek reimbursement for repairs.
Duration and Time Frame: 24 hours a day for approximately 15 days between July 2026 and
September 2026.
Notification: WSDOT will notify the City’s representative 10 days prior to implementation of
the detour.
City of Pasco Representative:
Andrey Avetisyan
525 N. 3rd Avenue
2nd Floor
Pasco, WA 99301
Office: 509-544-4131
avetisyana@pasco-wa.gov
WSDOT Representative:
Andres Mendoza, P.E.
Construction Project Engineer
1655 Fowler Street
Richland, WA 99352
Office: 509-222-2440
Andres.Mendoza@wsdot.wa.gov
Page 31 of 194
DETOUR PLAN 28
28
B. WHITE
NB RAMP TERMINAL IMPROVEMENTS
KARTCHNER ST I/C
US 395
A. MENDOZA
DU1
26Y002
U. VARGAS
U. VARGAS
P. COOPER
C
O
M
M
E
R
CI
A
L
R
A
I
N
I
E
R
A
V
E
A
V
E
J
A
S
O
N
C
A
P
I
T
O
L
A
V
E
KARTCHNER ST
HILLSBORO ST
COMMERCIAL AVE CLOSED
US 395 KARTCHNER ST I/C- DETOUR PLAN
395
A
V
E
LEVEL
TYPE 3 BARRICADE
TEMPORARY SIGN LOCATION
DETOUR ROUTE "PAVEMENT REPAIR EXCAVATION INC HAUL" AND "HMA FOR PAVEMENT REPAIR".
BY THIS DETOUR ROUTE SHALL BE REPAIRED BY BID ITEMS
4. AS APPROVED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER, DAMAGES TO THE ROADWAY CAUSED
3. THE DETOUR PLAN SHALL BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH CLASS A SIGN PLAN.
2. COVER SIGNS WHEN NOT ON USE.
1. ALL SIGNS ARE BLACK ON ORANGE UNLESS OTHERWISE DESIGNATED.
NOTES:
CLOSED
ROAD
RO D CLOSED
LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY
NOT TO SCALE
HILLSBORO ST
FILE NAME
TIME
DATE
PLOTTED BY
DESIGNED BY
ENTERED BY
CHECKED BY
PROJ. ENGR.
REGIONAL ADM.
REVISION DATE BY
LOCATION NO.CONTRACT NO.
JOB NUMBER
NO.
REGION STATE FED. AID PROJ. NO.
WASH
PLAN REF NO
BilslaB
22-Jun-2026
2:13:18 PM
XL6976_PS_DT_Sheet_AD01.dgn
10
SHEET
OF
SHEETS
p
w
:
/
/
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
o
r
e
.
w
s
d
o
t
.
w
a
.
g
o
v
:
W
S
D
O
T
/
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
/
S
o
u
t
h
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
/
_
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
/
3
9
5
/
0
.
3
6
_
K
a
r
t
c
h
n
e
r
S
t
-
N
B
R
a
m
p
_
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
/
D
e
s
i
g
n
/
_
C
A
D
D
/
S
h
e
e
t
s
/
4
2
0
-
D
e
t
o
u
r
P
l
a
n
/
A
D
0
1
/
X
L
6
9
7
6
_
P
S
_
D
T
_
S
h
e
e
t
_
A
D
0
1
.
d
g
n
c
:
\
u
s
e
r
s
\
b
i
l
s
l
a
b
\
p
w
_
w
s
d
o
t
\
d
0
9
9
1
0
6
9
\
X
L
6
9
7
6
_
P
S
_
D
T
_
S
h
e
e
t
_
A
D
0
1
.
d
g
n
W SD O T
STAMP BOX STAMP BOX
AD1- NOTE ADDED 6/22/2026 ZCB
DETOUR
DETOUR DETOUR
DETOUR
DETOUR
DETOUR
M4-9R
30"
24"
48"
30"
R11-2 (B/W)
M4-9
30"
24"
M4-9R
30"
24"
60"
30"
R11-3A (B/W)
M4-9L
30"
24"
M4-9L
30"
24"
M4-9L
30"
24"
(R/B/W)
R3-2
24"
24"
Pa
g
e
3
2
o
f
1
9
4
HR5-1004
Exhibit B
Page 1 of 2
AGREEMENT HR5-1004
EXHIBIT “B”
JOINT INSPECTION MEMORANDUM
This Memorandum is to document the baseline conditions of the Agency road(s) to be utilized as
part of the detour.
Project: US 395 Kartchner St. I/C NB Ramp Terminal Improvements
Agency Road(s): Kartchner St., N. Capitol Ave., E. Hillsboro St., N. Commercial Ave.
Date of Inspection(s): 5/28/2026
Existing Conditions (circle condition and identify any areas needing attention):
Pavement Condition (including shoulders):
Excellent Good Acceptable Cracking
Pavement Condition Notes:
N Capitol Ave: all paving joints are showing early signs of cracking. Southbound lane has a
longitudinal crack about 3’ from fogline on wheelpath.
E Hillsboro St: lots of alligator cracking and a few blowouts.
N Commercial Ave: looks to be the same condition as N Capitol Ave, maybe a bit better (not as
many joints).
Kartchner St: has concrete lanes and acceptable asphalt shoulders adjacent to curb and gutter.
See pictures.
Striping Condition (circle condition and identify any areas needing attention):
Excellent Good Acceptable Worn
Striping Condition Notes:
N Capitol Ave: striping is acceptable
E Hillsboro St: has one non-existent stop bar WB at N Commercial Ave. No striping other than
that.
N Commercial Ave: stripping is worn but, visible mostly.
Kartchner St: stripping is worn but, visible mostly.
Signage Condition (circle condition and identify any areas needing attention):
Page 33 of 194
HR5-1004
Exhibit B
Page 2 of 2
Excellent Good Acceptable Damaged
Signage Condition Notes:
Street signs are all in and visible.
Repairs:
Repairs to be completed prior to detour implementation including but not limited to delineation,
pavement repair, and clearing of obstructions (List below or indicate N/A):
1. Pasco has no plans of work until the fall, which will be crack sealing.
2. Pasco has requested that we Grind and Pave E Hillsboro St., and Crack Seal Kartchner, N
Capitol Ave and, N Commercial Ave. prior to implementing the detour. WSDOT cannot commit
to this request due to the limited funds of the project and the detoured traffic is associated with
local traffic movements, not re-routing of highway traffic on the local road. WSDOT will repair
all pavement that has deteriorated as a result of the extra vehicles on the detour route. WSDOT
will work with the city on determining these areas following the usage of the detour.
3.
4.
Routine Maintenance:
Routine maintenance will be completed by WSDOT or its contractor in accordance with standard
maintenance practices throughout the use of the detour.
Page 34 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 9, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Gabriela Sanchez, City Clerk
City Manager
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Appointment
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Virakpanyou, Sonny Application
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to appoint Sonny Virakpanyou to Position No. 1 (term
expiration date 12/31/2027) to the Planning Commission.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Planning Commission is composed of nine members; terms are for five
years. The Commission meets on the third Thursday of each month at 6:30
p.m.
The Planning Commission conducts workshop meetings and public hearings
on land-use policy and development proposals and issues recommendations
for the City Council.
V. DISCUSSION:
Following conduct of interviews on July 8, 2026, the Mayor has suggested the
appointment be made as outlined in the motion above.
Page 35 of 194
BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION
Application Type: Pasco Public Facilities District Board
Secondary Choices: Planning Commission
Name Sonny Virakpanyou
Address
Phone
Alternative Phone
Email Address
District of Residence: District 3
Registered Voter: No
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Length of Residency 41
What gender do you identify with? Male
Race or Ethnicity Asian / Cambodian
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
Employment Status
Employed
Employer
Sonar Insights
Present Employment
CEO - Feb 2020
Educational Background
Washington State University (Pullman) - BA International Business and Marketing
Columbia Basin College (Pasco) - AA Business Administration / Marketing
Reason for Applying
I’ve called Pasco home since I was three years old, and it’s truly shaped who I am today. This
community has given me lifelong friendships, a strong sense of family, and the foundation to build my
business. Growing up and working here has allowed me to understand not just the city itself, but the
people—what they value, what they need, and where they see opportunity. That perspective is
something I carry with a lot of pride.
Serving on the board commission feels like a natural way to give back to the place that has given me
so much. I see real potential for Pasco to continue growing, innovating, and standing out as a leading
city in Washington. I want to be part of helping guide that future—making thoughtful decisions that
reflect our community and create even greater opportunities. Most importantly, I want to ensure
others have access to the same, or better, opportunities that I’ve been fortunate enough to
experience here.
Relevant Experience
Page 36 of 194
Sonny Virakpanyou
I have had the privilege of serving on the Benton Franklin Workforce Development Council and
recently the West Richland Chamber of Commerce. In these roles, I’ve contributed thoughtful insights
shaped by both my perspective as a community member and my professional background in market
research.
I bring a data-driven approach to board service—helping translate community needs into actionable
insights. By applying proven research methodologies, I support these organizations in gathering
meaningful feedback, understanding public sentiment, and leveraging data to make informed,
strategic decisions that better serve the community.
Community Involvement
In my role as CEO of Sonar Insights, I have led a wide range of community-centered projects
spanning both for-profit and nonprofit sectors. My work is rooted in helping organizations better
understand the communities they serve—translating insights into strategies that build engagement,
strengthen brand identity, and drive sustainable growth.
Most recently, I partnered on the Pasco Aquatic Center project, where we worked closely with
community members to shape the facility’s brand, name, and identity. This effort informed not only
the visual and experiential elements of the center, but also ensured it reflected the values and
expectations of the community it serves. I have applied a similar approach with organizations such as
Senior Life Services (now Generational Care), Columbia Industries (now Columbia Ability Alliance), 3
Rivers Community Foundation, Columbia Basin College, Kennewick School District, the Art Center
Task Force, Energy Northwest and B5, among others. Through this work, I’ve been fortunate to play
a meaningful role in strengthening the fabric of our community. Truly an blessing.
Have you served on this board, commission, or committee in the past and if so, how many terms did
you serve?
Not applicable
Do you have any financial or personal conflicts of interest that would interfere with your participation
on this board/commission?
No
I am available to participate in the regularly scheduled board/commission meetings
Yes
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:
Length of Residency:
41
Race or Ethnicity:
Asian / Cambodian
What gender do you identify with?
Male
Disibility:
No
APPLICATION AGREEMENT
I agree that all of the information contained in my responses to the questions on this application are
true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further agree that, by checking the box below and
submitting this application, online or otherwise, I am affixing my digital signature to this form as of the
date submitted. I also understand that this application and supporting documents may be available for
public inspection.
Page 37 of 194
Sonny Virakpanyou
☒ I Agree
Signature:
Sonny Virakpanyou
Page 38 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 9, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Gabriela Sanchez, City Clerk
City Manager
SUBJECT: LEOFF Disability Board Appointment
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Christiansen, Jodi Application
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to appoint Jodi Christiansen to Position No. 3 (term expiration
date 07/15/2028) to the LEOFF Disability Board.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The LEOFF Disability board is composed of five members, terms are for 2
years. The board meets on the Third Monday of each month at 6:30 p.m.
body decision-making local the as serves board Disability LEOFF The
responsible for administering disability and certain medical benefits for eligible
LEOFF plan 1 law enforcement officers and firefighters in accordance with
Washington State law. The board does not oversee retirement benefits,
personnel matters, or department operations, its role is limited to determining
eligibility for benefits authorized under RCW 41.26.
V. DISCUSSION:
Following conduct of interviews on July 8, 2026, the Mayor has suggested the
appointment be made as outlined in the motion above.
Page 39 of 194
BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION
Application Type: LEOFF Disability Board
Secondary Choices: Planning Commission
Name Jodi Christiansen
Address
Phone
Alternative Phone
Email Address
District of Residence: District 3
Registered Voter: Yes
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Length of Residency 15
What gender do you identify with? Female
Race or Ethnicity Caucasian
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
Employment Status
Employed
Employer
RC Engineering & Construction Management
Present Employment
President - 11/2019 - Present
Previous position was Operations Manager/Business Development Manager - 03/2017-10/2019
Project Manager - HukariAscendent - 02/2014 - 03/2017
Business Development Director - Excelsior Design - 07/2013 - 07/2014
Senior Project Administrator/Business Development - 06/2009 - 06/2013
Educational Background
I have an AA in General Studies and a Business Certificate from the UW Foster School of Business
in Consulting & Business Development.
Reason for Applying
I have been a resident of Pasco for over 15 years and have decided it is time to give back to my
community. As a business owner in Richland and a homeowner in Pasco, I see the impacts of
decisions being made, and I want to be more involved. My primary interest is the LEOFF Disability
Board because I have a deep respect for the men and women who choose public safety as a
profession. Two of my uncles spent their careers as firefighters on the Hanford Site, and my stepson
served three seasons as a wildlands firefighter. That experience made personal what I already
believed - these are the people who walk toward danger when everyone else walks away. They
deserve systems that work for them when they need it most, and I want to participate in a meaningful
way in supporting those individuals.
Page 40 of 194
Jodi Christiansen
Relevant Experience
In my roles and career progression, I have learned all aspects of business. As President of RC
Engineering & Construction Management, I oversee all operations for a woman-owned small
business serving federal clients including the Department of Energy and the Army Corps of
Engineers. As an employer, I have dealt with HR issues, workplace injuries, and employees on
disability — experience that translates directly to understanding the rules and regulations that govern
LEOFF claims. My work also requires making consequential decisions that affect people's livelihoods
while handling sensitive information with strict confidentiality. I take that responsibility seriously,
which is reflected in my active federal security clearance. I also serve as Vice President of the
National Contract Management Association Columbia Basin Chapter, where I have gained additional
experience in board governance and fiduciary responsibility.
Community Involvement
Over the years I have volunteered with several community organizations including Toys for Tots,
Bikes for Tikes, and security for various events. Prior to moving to Pasco, I volunteered with Benton
County Fire District 4 auxiliary, providing rehabilitation support to firefighters during large-scale
responses — an experience that gave me direct insight into the physical demands and risks these
men and women face on the job.
Have you served on this board, commission, or committee in the past and if so, how many terms did
you serve?
No I haven't, but I would like to get more involved.
Do you have any financial or personal conflicts of interest that would interfere with your participation
on this board/commission?
No
I am available to participate in the regularly scheduled board/commission meetings
Yes
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:
Length of Residency:
15
Race or Ethnicity:
Caucasian
What gender do you identify with?
Female
Disibility:
N/A
APPLICATION AGREEMENT
I agree that all of the information contained in my responses to the questions on this application are
true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further agree that, by checking the box below and
submitting this application, online or otherwise, I am affixing my digital signature to this form as of the
date submitted. I also understand that this application and supporting documents may be available for
public inspection.
☒ I Agree
Signature:
Jodi Christiansen
Page 41 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 9, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Gabriela Sanchez, City Clerk
City Manager
SUBJECT: Pasco Public Facilities District Board Reappointment and Appointment
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Gillespie, Marie Application
Maloney, Craig Application
Maloney, Craig Letter of Recommendation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to reappoint Marie Gillespie to Position No. 4 and appoint
Craig Maloney to Position No. 5 to the Pasco Public Facilities District Board
with both terms expiring on 07/15/2030.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Pasco Public Facilities District (PPFD) Board is composed of five (5)
members with staggering position terms, which are for four (4) years each.
The Board oversees operation of the Pasco Public Facilities District. In this
capacity, the PPFD is authorized by charter to acquire, construct, operate and
maintain any qualified public facility.
The PFD oversees payment of Pasco's share of a special state sales tax grant
intended for "regional centers," in partnership with the Kennewick Public
Facilities District for the Three Rivers Convention Center.
Per RCW 35.57.010(3)(a)(ii), three of the five PPFD Board members must be
appointed by the legislative body based on recommendations by a "local
organization(s)".
Page 42 of 194
Position Nos. 2, 3 and 5 require the applicant(s) a recommendation from a
local organization. Mr. Maloney's application packet includes a letter of
recommendation from the Pasco Chamber of Commerce supporting his
appointment to the PPFD Board.
V. DISCUSSION:
Following conducts of interviews on July 8, 2026, the Mayor has suggested the
re-appointment and appointment as outlined in the motion above.
Page 43 of 194
BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION
Application Type: Pasco Public Facilities District Board
Name MARIE GILLESPIE
Address
Phone
Alternative Phone
Email Address
District of Residence: District 2
Registered Voter: Yes
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Length of Residency 24
What gender do you identify with? female
Race or Ethnicity asian
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
Employment Status
Employed
Employer
CENTRAL PLATEAU CLEANUP COMPANY
Present Employment
PROJECT MANAGER AT HANFORD SINCE 2000
Educational Background
BS BIOENGINEERING
MS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
Reason for Applying
Current PPFDB member for the past 8 years (2 terms)
Relevant Experience
I have served on the PPFDB for 2 terms. I helped get the Pasco Aquatic Center funded by the sales
tax, design and build the facility.
Community Involvement
See above.
Have you served on this board, commission, or committee in the past and if so, how many terms did
you serve?
See above.
Do you have any financial or personal conflicts of interest that would interfere with your participation
on this board/commission?
Page 44 of 194
MARIE GILLESPIE
none
I am available to participate in the regularly scheduled board/commission meetings
Yes
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:
Length of Residency:
24
Race or Ethnicity:
asian
What gender do you identify with?
female
Disibility:
none
APPLICATION AGREEMENT
I agree that all of the information contained in my responses to the questions on this application are
true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further agree that, by checking the box below and
submitting this application, online or otherwise, I am affixing my digital signature to this form as of the
date submitted. I also understand that this application and supporting documents may be available for
public inspection.
☒ I Agree
Signature:
Marie T Gillespie
Page 45 of 194
BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION
Application Type: Pasco Public Facilities District Board
Name Craig Maloney
Address
Phone
Alternative Phone
Email Address
District of Residence: District 6
Registered Voter: Yes
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Length of Residency 20 years
What gender do you identify with? Male
Race or Ethnicity White
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
Employment Status
Employed
Employer
PNNL
Present Employment
Research Analyst, October 2019 - Present
Educational Background
B. S., Applied and Computational Mathematical Sciences, Minor in Mathematics, University of
Washington
Reason for Applying
I am excited to rejoin the board as it transitions from construction to operations. As a small business
owner in Pasco, a project manager at PNNL, and long-standing community volunteer, I am well-
equipped to help the PFD be successful.
Relevant Experience
Pasco PFD Board Member 2013 - 2017, Pasco City Council Liaison to Pasco PFD 2018 - 2023, and
current Advisory Member of the Pasco PFD.
Community Involvement
Pasco City Council Member, District 6 2018 - 2023, Pasco Taco Crawl Committee Member 2015 -
Present, etc.
Have you served on this board, commission, or committee in the past and if so, how many terms did
you serve?
I previously served on the Pasco PFD Board, 2013 - 2017.
Page 46 of 194
Craig Maloney
Do you have any financial or personal conflicts of interest that would interfere with your participation
on this board/commission?
No.
I am available to participate in the regularly scheduled board/commission meetings
Yes
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:
Length of Residency:
20 years
Race or Ethnicity:
White
What gender do you identify with?
Male
Disibility:
None
APPLICATION AGREEMENT
I agree that all of the information contained in my responses to the questions on this application are
true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further agree that, by checking the box below and
submitting this application, online or otherwise, I am affixing my digital signature to this form as of the
date submitted. I also understand that this application and supporting documents may be available for
public inspection.
☒ I Agree
Signature:
Craig Maloney
Page 47 of 194
1110 Osprey Pointe Boulevard, Suite 101 ן Pasco, WA 99301 ן (509) 547-9755 ן www.pascochamber.org
June 9, 2026
Mayor Charles Grimm, City of Pasco
525 North 3rd Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
Dear Mayor Grimm:
Please accept this letter of recommendation for re-appointment to the Pasco Public Facilities District for
Mr. Craig Maloney. Mr. Maloney has dutifully served the Pasco community as a city councilmember Public
for many years and his apportionment will further ensure that the overall mission for the PFD continues as
it works to improve the business and tourism climate in Pasco.
Craig has been a long-time community supporter and active in the Pasco Chamber of Commerce and Pasco
Taco Crawl. Craig’s leadership and experience in the community makes him an excellent choice to be
appointed to the Pasco PFD..
Sincerely,
Colin Hastings
Executive Director
Page 48 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 29, 2026
TO: Harold L. Stewart II, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Craig Raymond, Deputy Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Public Meeting & Resolution No. 4765 - Accepting a Notice of Intent to
Commence Annexation Goodwin 10% Annexation Petition (ANX 2026-
002) (5 minutes)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution 4765
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
PPT
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
CONDUCT A PUBLIC MEETING
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4765, accepting the Notice of
Intent to Commence Annexation proceedings for the Goodwin Annexation for
Parcel No. 118180157 (Parcel 1 of AFN 456145), located south of Harris Road
and north of Interstate 182, southwest of the future Road 108 and Harris Road
intersection, in Section 18, Township 9 North, Range 29 E.W.M., establishing
the proposed annexation boundary and determining whether simultaneous
zoning and the assumption of bonded indebtedness will be required.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Annexation Process Overview
At its July 6, 2026, meeting, the City Council established July 20, 2026, as the
meeting date required under Chapter 35A.14 RCW following receipt of the
Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings for the proposed
Goodwin Annexation.
Page 49 of 194
The proposed annexation is being processed using the Direct Petition (60
Percent Petition) Method authorized under RCW 35A.14.120 through RCW
35A.14.150. At this stage of the process, the City Council is required to meet
with reject, accept, to whether or and party initiating the determine
geographically modify the proposed annexation area, determine whether the
annexation area will assume all or a portion of the City's existing bonded
indebtedness, and determine whether simultaneous zoning will be required.
Acceptance of the Notice of Intent does not approve the annexation but
authorizes the applicants and City staff to proceed with the remaining statutory
annexation process.
Background
On May 22, 2026, Daisy Harris of Core States, on behalf of Larry and Malvina
Goodwin, submitted a Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings
(10 Percent Petition) for Parcel No. 118180157 (Parcel 1 of AFN 456145),
located south of Harris Road and north of Interstate 182, southwest of the
future Road 108 and Harris Road intersection in Section 18, Township 9 North,
Range 29 E.W.M., Franklin County, Washington.
Following receipt of the Notice of Intent, staff reviewed the proposal for
procedural and sufficiency and coordinated with affected agencies City
departments.
On July 6, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. _____ establishing
July 20, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. as the date and time to meet with the initiating party
and consider the Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings for
the proposed Goodwin Annexation.
Impact (Other than fiscal)
The action before the City Council is limited to consideration of the Notice of
Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings. As part of this action, the
Council will meet with the initiating party and determine whether to accept,
reject, or geographically modify the proposed annexation area, determine
whether simultaneous zoning will be required, and determine whether the
annexation area will assume all or a portion of the City's existing bonded
indebtedness. the not does Intent approve Notice the of Acceptance of
annexation but authorizes the proposed annexation to proceed through the
remaining statutory process.
V. DISCUSSION:
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the resolution accepting the
Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings for the proposed
Goodwin the Annexation. Staff further recommends accepting proposed
Page 50 of 194
annexation area as submitted, requiring simultaneous zoning of the annexation
area, and requiring the annexation area to assume its proportionate share of
the City's existing bonded indebtedness.
Constraints (Time or other considerations)
Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the City Council is required to meet with the
initiating parties within sixty (60) days of receiving a valid Notice of Intent to
Commence Annexation Proceedings. This requirement was satisfied when the
City Council established the meeting date on July 6, 2026, for consideration of
the Notice of Intent on July 20, 2026.
Following Council's action, staff will continue processing the proposed
annexation in accordance with Chapter 35A.14 RCW. While there are few
statutory deadlines governing the remainder of the annexation process, RCW
35A.01.040(8) provides that signatures dated more than six (6) months prior to
the filing of the annexation petition must be stricken. Accordingly, staff will
continue to advance the annexation process in a timely manner to ensure the
petition remains valid and avoid the need to obtain new signatures.
Staff Analysis
Staff has reviewed the Notice of Intent and determined that it is procedurally
sufficient to continue through the annexation process. The proposed
the and Plan City's Comprehensive with consistent is annexation the
Broadmoor Master Plan land use designation. Acceptance of the Notice of
Intent establishes the framework for continued processing of the annexation
but does not constitute approval of the annexation itself.
Next Steps
If the Council accepts the Notice of Intent, staff will proceed with the remaining
annexation process, including certification of the annexation petition by the
Franklin proposed of processing the Office Assessor's County and
simultaneous zoning through the Hearing Examiner. Following the Hearing
Examiner's recommendation, the City Council will consider both the annexation
ordinance and the zoning ordinance. A public hearing before the City Council
on the zoning recommendation will only be required if the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation is appealed or if the City Council, by majority vote, elects to
conduct its own public hearing. If ultimately annexed, the property will become
subject to applicable City regulations, development standards, and municipal
services.
Alternatives
1. to staff direct and area proposed the Modify continue annexation
processing the annexation. Such modifications may require revised
petition materials and additional property owner signatures before the
process can proceed.
Page 51 of 194
2. Approve the resolution with different determinations regarding
simultaneous zoning and/or the assumption of bonded indebtedness.
3. Reject the Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings,
thereby terminating the current annexation proposal.
Page 52 of 194
Resolution: MF# ANX 2026-002 - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
ACCEPTING THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION
PROCEEDINGS FOR THE PROPOSED GOODWIN ANNEXATION;
DETERMINING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA; AND
DETERMINING WHETHER SIMULTANEOUS ZONING AND THE
ASSUMPTION OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE REQUIRED.
WHEREAS, the owners of property of Parcel No. 118180157 (Parcel 1 of AFN 456145)
have filed a Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings to the City of Pasco; and
WHEREAS, on July 6, 2026 the City Council set a July 20, 2026, public meeting date
with the initiators to consider (1) whether the City will accept, reject, or geographically modify
the proposed a adoption of simultaneous the require will it whether (2) proposed annexation;
zoning regulation; and (3) whether it will require the assumption of all or any portion of existing
City indebtedness by the area to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Notice of Intent, conducted a public
meeting with the initiators, and has determined it is in the best interests of the City to accept the
proposal as described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that the proposed annexation site is within the Pasco
Urban Growth Area, annexation of the proposed site would be a natural extension of the City and
said annexation would be in the best interest of the Pasco community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
That the City will accept the proposed territory to be annexed as described in Exhibit A
and depicted in Exhibit B attached hereto.
Be It Further Resolved, that the territory to be annexed will not require simultaneous
adoption of zoning regulations. Zoning will be determined through a public hearing process with
input from affected property owners.
Be It Further Resolved that the annexation area will be required to assume a proportionate
share of existing City bonded indebtedness.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 53 of 194
Resolution: MF# ANX 2026-002 - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of
________________, 20__.
Charles Grimm
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Gabriela Sanchez Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 54 of 194
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description
For APN/Parcel ID(s): 118180157
That portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 9
North, Range 29 East, W.M., records of Franklin County, Washington lying Northwesterly of
the Northwesterly margin of State Highway SR 182 right of way and Easterly of the following
described line:
Beginning at a point on the North line of said Section which is 1711.47 feet East, as
measured along said North line, from the Northwest corner thereof, said point being the
True Point of Beginning; thence South 03°04' East a distance of 654.59 feet to intersect the
Northwesterly right of way line of State Highway SR 182 and the terminus of said line
EXCEPT Harris Road right of way along the North line thereof
Page 55 of 194
Item:Parcel 118180157 Annexation N01 10%
"Exhibit B"Applicant(s):Larry &Malvina Goodwin
File #:ANX2026-002
NaK
210 410 820 1,200 1,60
III-:—:I
Feet
Pa
g
e
5
6
o
f
1
9
4
Pasco City Council
July 20, 2026
Regular Meeting
Pa
g
e
5
7
o
f
1
9
4
Public Meeting &
Resolution –
Accepting a Notice of
Intent to Commence
Annexation for the
Goodwin Petition
(ANX 2026-002)
July 20, 2026
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
5
8
o
f
1
9
4
Pa
g
e
5
9
o
f
1
9
4
Annexation Process Overview
•Council considers:
-Acceptance, rejection, or modification of annexation area
-Assumption of City indebtedness
-Simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations
•If accepted, applicants submit formal 60% annexation petition for verification
(sometimes 100% is received initially)
•Petition reviewed and certified by Franklin County Assessor’s Office
•Hearing Examiner reviews proposed zoning and forwards recommendation to City
Council
•City Council conducts a public hearing and adopts an annexation and zoning
ordinance
•Following approval, staff coordinates required notifications with OFM, County,
utility providers, and other agencies
Pa
g
e
6
0
o
f
1
9
4
ANX 2026-002 – Goodwin Notice of Intent to
Commence Annexation
On July 6, 2026 City Council Passed a Resolution setting 7:00 PM, July 20,
2026, as the time and date for a public meeting to consider a Notice of Intent to
Commence Annexation Proceedings for the Goodwin Annexation Area.
City Council tonight will consider:
-Acceptance, rejection, or modification of annexation area
-Assumption of City indebtedness
-Simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations
July 6, 2026 Set
Date
Tonight -Public
Meeting with
Initiating Party &
Accept Notice of
Intent
Later-Public Hearing
for Annexation and
Ordinance for Both
Annexation and
Zoning
Determination
Pa
g
e
6
1
o
f
1
9
4
Recommendation
•Accept the proposed annexation area as submitted.
•Approve the resolution accepting the Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings.
•Require zoning of the annexation area to go through the Public Hearing process with input from affected
property owners.
•Require the annexation area to assume its proportionate share of the City's existing bonded indebtedness.
Pa
g
e
6
2
o
f
1
9
4
Questions?
Thank you!
Pa
g
e
6
3
o
f
1
9
4
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 14, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Craig Raymond, Deputy Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance No. 4848 - R-15 and R-S-12 Frontage
Improvement Code Amendments
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
1. Draft Ordinance
2.Map of R-15 and R-S-12 zones
3.PowerPoint
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Conduct Public Hearing
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4848, amending Pasco Municipal
Code (PMC) Title 12.04 required sidewalk and driveway improvements; Title
12.36 concurrency; and Title 21.15 complete streets policy; and providing for
severability and establishing an effective date.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed amendments may reduce upfront development costs for
property owners and builders within the affected residential zoning districts by
deferring construction of certain frontage improvements. Future public
infrastructure improvements may require City funding, grant funding, Local
Improvement Districts, or other financing mechanisms if improvements are
constructed at a later date.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Background:
On April 13, 2026, the City Council conducted a workshop to discuss frontage
improvement requirements within the R-S-12 and R-S-20 (now R-15)
residential zoning districts. The discussion reviewed the history of Ordinance
4454A, the City's Complete Streets Policy, right-of-way needs, pedestrian
Page 64 of 194
safety considerations, Urban Growth Area standards, state middle housing
requirements, and potential alternatives for addressing frontage improvements.
The workshop materials outlined several policy options, including maintaining
existing frontage improvement requirements, restoring exemptions,
dedication. right-of-way requiring programs, fee-in-lieu implementing and
Council reviewed the benefits and challenges associated with each option,
including development costs, neighborhood character, future infrastructure
needs, transportation planning considerations, and long-term City obligations.
Since the April 13, 2026, workshop, the City's zoning code has been updated
and the former R-S-20 zoning district has been replaced by the R-15 zoning
district. Accordingly, references to the R-S-20 district discussed during the
workshop have been replaced with the R-15 district in the proposed ordinance.
Additionally, the City Council held a workshop meeting on July 13, 2026, where
an updated draft of the proposed code language was reviewed and discussed.
City Council Direction:
Upon review and discussion, Council expressed that the draft as submitted
was generally satisfactory to be presented during the July 20, 2026 public
hearing inclusive of the provisions requiring right-of-way dedication as a non-
waivable condition of development approval within the R-15 and R-S-12 zoning
districts. The proposed amendments preserve future utility, roadway, bicycle,
pedestrian, and other public infrastructure corridors while deferring construction
of frontage improvements such as sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and streetlights.
An additional element of the proposed amendments is the mechanism
exemption acknowledge to the from benefiting owners property requiring
possible future participation in public infrastructure financing. The proposed
amendments require a recorded agreement acknowledging that the property
owner will not contest the formation of a future Local Improvement District (LID)
or similar funding mechanism for roadway or frontage improvements serving
the or completion project following years (5) five of period a for area
occupancy.
V. DISCUSSION:
Proposed Code Amendments:
The proposed amendments would restore and revise PMC 12.04.080 (Optional
Standards for the R-15 and R-S-12 Districts). Under the proposed code
language, frontage improvements including sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and
streetlights would not be required as a condition of permit approval when all of
the following criteria are met:
Page 65 of 194
Required right-of-way is dedicated as a non-waivable condition of
development approval to preserve future capacity for roadway, bicycle,
pedestrian, improvements infrastructure public and utility, other
identified in adopted transportation plans;
A Traffic Impact Analysis, when required, does not identify frontage,
pedestrian, bicycle or roadway improvements as necessary to satisfy
concurrency, traffic safety, or life-safety requirements ; and
The property owner executes and records an agreement acknowledging
that they will not contest the formation of a future Local Improvement
District (LID) or similar funding mechanism established for roadway or
frontage improvements serving the area for a period of five years
following project completion or occupancy.
PMC (Concurrency 12.36.050 proposed to amendments addition, In are
Development Standards) and PMC 21.15.030 (Street Improvements) to ensure
consistency between the frontage improvement exemption and existing
concurrency, street improvement, and Complete Streets-related requirements.
These amendments establish cross-references to PMC 12.04.080 and clarify
that qualifying development within the R-15 and R-S-12 zoning districts may be
exempt from frontage improvement requirements otherwise required by those
sections.
Environmental Review and Public Notice:
A SEPA notice was processed on July 1, 2026. Comments received regarding
the environmental review will be summarized and incorporated into the final
staff report prepared for the July 20, 2026, public hearing.
Notice was provided to the Washington State Department of Commerce on
June 12, 2026, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106.
Notice of Public Hearing was published on June 24, 2026, for the July 20, 2026
public hearing.
Impact (Other Than Fiscal):
The proposed code amendments are expected to reduce upfront development
costs within the R-15 and R-S-12 zoning districts by allowing qualifying
development to defer construction of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, streetlights, and
certain related frontage improvements that would otherwise be required under
City code.
The exemption would apply only when a Traffic Impact Analysis, if required,
does not identify roadway, frontage, bicycle, or pedestrian improvements as
necessary to satisfy concurrency, traffic safety, or life-safety requirements. The
amendments would continue to require dedication of any necessary right-of-
way as a non-waivable condition of development approval to preserve future
Page 66 of 194
transportation and utility corridors identified in the City's adopted transportation
plans.
The amendments also establish exemptions from certain frontage improvement
requirements contained within the City's concurrency and street improvement
regulations while preserving the City's ability to require improvements where
warranted by public safety, traffic safety, or concurrency requirements.
Staff recognizes that the proposal may result in some roadway, frontage,
bicycle, pedestrian, and Complete Streets improvements being constructed at
a later date through future capital projects, Local Improvement Districts, grants,
developer participation, or other funding mechanisms. Staff also notes that the
proposal represents a policy shift from the City's longstanding approach of
incrementally constructing transportation infrastructure as development occurs.
However, staff believes the proposal can be implemented without creating legal
conflicts with existing City plans, provided adequate right-of-way is preserved
and traffic and life-safety requirements continue to be evaluated through the
Traffic Impact Analysis process.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends consideration of the proposed ordinance implementing City
Council direction by restoring frontage improvement exemptions within the R-
15 and R-S-12 zoning districts, requiring right-of-way dedication as a condition
of development approval, requiring a recorded LID participation
acknowledgment, and establishing corresponding amendments to the City's
concurrency and street improvement regulations.
Constraints (Time or Other Consideration):
Timely adoption of preferred code amendments will facilitate the completion of
ongoing plat and development projects.
Next Steps
The City Clerk’s Office will record it with the Franklin County Auditor and
coordinate with General Code to ensure the updated code is published and
effective on the adoption date.
Alternatives:
1. Maintain existing frontage improvement requirements.
2. Adopt the proposed right-of-way dedication, Traffic Impact Analysis, and
recorded LID participation acknowledgment approach.
3. Restore the frontage improvement exemption without requiring right-of-
way dedication or a recorded LID participation acknowledgment.
4. Direct staff to evaluate alternative fee-in-lieu, reimbursement, or
infrastructure financing programs.
Page 67 of 194
Page 68 of 194
ORDINANCE NO. ____________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING PASCO MUNICIPAL CODE (PMC) TITLE 12.04 REQUIRED
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTSAND DRIVEWAY ; TITLE 12.36
CONCURRENCY; AND TITLE 21.15 COMPLETE STREETS POLICY; AND
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, on September 3, 2019, the Pasco City Council adopted Ordinance 4484,
removing previous exemptions from curb, gutter, sidewalk and streetlight requirements; and
WHEREAS, certain development improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and
streetlights increase up-front per-lot costs to new construction; and
WHEREAS, in areas with very low traffic volume, these costs may not be proportionate
with immediate need; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco Planning Staff conducted a City Council workshop to
discuss options for preserving semi-rural neighborhood character and incentivizing housing
affordability in certain low-density Zoning Districts within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council provided direction to City Staff to draft code amendments
to be considered at a future public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted an additional workshop meeting on July 13, 2026
to review proposed code amendments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on July 20, 2026 to discuss Ordinance
XX; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amending the Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 12.04, Required Sidewalk and
Driveway Improvements
Chapter 12.04
REQUIRED SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Sections:
12.04.010 Purpose
12.04.020 Definitions
12.04.030 Responibility of abutting property
12.04.040 Permit Required
12.04.050 Permit Fee
Page 69 of 194
12.04.060 Sidewalks
12.04.070 New Construction-Sidewalks and curbs required
12.04.080 Repealed Optional standards for the R-15 and R-S-12 districts
12.04.090 Security in lieu of completion of sidewalk and curb
12.04.100 Driveway standards
12.04.110 Abandoned driveway
12.04.120 Existing Driveways
12.04.130 Inspection-Conformance to plan
12.04.140 Maintenance of sidewalks
12.04.080 Optional standards for the R-S-20 and R-S-12 districts.
Repealed by Ord. 4454.
12.04.080 Optional standards for the R-15 and R-S-12 districts.
(1) Within the zones identified in this section, the installation of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and
streetlights shall not be required as a condition of permit approval for new construction,
provided that all of the following criteria are met:
(a) The applicant shall dedicate any required right-of-way as a non-waivable
condition of development approval to preserve future capacity for roadway, bicycle,
pedestrian, utility, and other public infrastructure improvements identified in the
City's adopted transportation plans.
(b) A Traffic Impact Analysis, when required, does not identify frontage, pedestrian,
bicycle or roadway improvements as necessary to satisfy concurrency, traffic safety, or
life-safety requirements; and
(c) The property owner executes and records an agreement, in a form approved by the
City, acknowledging that they will not contest the formation of a future Local
Improvement District (LID) or similar funding mechanism established for the
construction of roadway or frontage improvements serving the area. Such agreement
shall remain in effect for a period of five (5) years following final occupancy or project
completion, whichever occurs later, and shall be recorded against the property prior to
issuance of any building permit.
Section 2. Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 12.36.050 Concurrency Development Standards
is amended as follows:
12.36.050 Concurrency development standards.
All development activities, exempt or nonexempt, are subject to the following development
standards:
(1) Street Improvements
Page 70 of 194
(a) Except as provided in PMC 12.04.080, Rright-of-way improvements shall
be required at the time adjoining property is developed and shall be required on all
property. As a minimum, a three-quarter street standard will be required if the
property being developed only fronts on one side of the street.
(b) Adequate and proper right-of-way improvements shall include curb, gutter,
sidewalk, illumination, traffic control devices, drainage control, engineered road
bases, asphalt driving and parking lanes, and monumentation. All such
improvements shall be approved by the City prior to construction and acceptance.
The three-quarter street standard shall include curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the
developed side and a minimum of two complete traffic lanes.
(c) The developer of real property shall be responsible for installing the required
improvements within the respective half of right-of-way width abutting the real
property being developed; provided, that such improvements consist of at least two
traffic lanes.
(d) Minimum sidewalk widths, not including the six-inch curb, shall not be less
than the following:
(i) Residential zones: four and one-half feet;
(ii) Commercial zones: six and one-half feet.
(2) Utility Improvements. Water and sewer improvements shall be required at the
time adjoining property is developed and shall be required on all property. Water
and sewer utilities shall be extended through the length of the property being
developed. The design and construction of water and sewer utilities shall conform
to the construction standards as prepared by the City Engineer.
Section 3. Pasco Municipal Code 21.15.030 Street improvements, is amended as follows:
21.15.030 Street improvements.
(1) Except as provided in PMC 12.04.080, Aadequate and proper right-of-way improvements
shall be required at the time adjoining property is developed and shall be required on all property. As a
minimum a three-quarter street standard will be required if the property being developed only fronts on one
side of the street.
(2) Adequate and proper right-of-way improvements shall include curb, gutter, sidewalk,
illumination, traffic control devices, drainage control, engineered road bases, asphalt driving and parking
lanes, nonmotorized facilities for bicyclists and pedestrians, and monumentation. All such improvements
shall be approved by the City prior to construction and acceptance. The three -quarter street standard shall
include curb, gutter and sidewalk on the developed side and a minimum of two complete traffic lanes.
(3) The developer of real property shall be responsible for installing the required improvements
within the respective half of right-of-way width abutting the real property being developed, provided such
improvements consist of at least two traffic lanes.
(4) Right-of-way widths shall be adequate for current, near-term, and long-term growth, and shall
be adequate to accommodate bike/ped facilities suitable for all ages and capabilities in accordance with the
Page 71 of 194
Complete Streets Ordinance (Chapter 12.15 PMC), and per the standard specifications as prepared by the
City Engineer.
(5) Functional classification designation and spacing is to be determined by the City
Engineer based on application of road spacing recommendations provided in the Pasco Municipal
Code, with consideration for existing nearby road classifications, existing ROW width, and
accommodating areas of inadequate road infrastructure.
(6) Except as provided in PMC 12.04.080, Aall improvements within the City of
Pasco public right-of-way shall be in conformance with the Pasco Complete Policy,
Chapter 12.15 PMC
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of
this ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this
ordinance.
Section 5. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including scrivener’ s
errors or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or
numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days
after approval, passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this _____ day of _________
2026.
Charles Grimm
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Published: _____________________________
Page 72 of 194
²0 1
Miles
6/24/2026DATE
Zoning - R15 & R-S-12
Legend
Zoning
R-15, Low Density Residential District
R-S-12, Residential Suburban District
Municple Boundaries
City Limits
Urban Growth Areas
Pa
g
e
7
3
o
f
1
9
4
R-S-12 & R-15 Frontage Improvement
Requirements
Policy Considerations for
Council
July 20, 2026
Pa
g
e
7
4
o
f
1
9
4
PURPOSE & BACKGROUND
Staff presents both benefits and concerns to help Council make an informed policy decision.
Ordinance 4454A (2019)
Removed Section 12.04.080, which
previously exempted R-S-12 and R-S-20
zones from sidewalk, curb, gutter, and
street light requirements.
Now proposed:
Council is considering allowing
developers in R-S-12/R-S-20 (now R-15)
to once again opt out of frontage
improvements at time of development.
BACKGROUND
WHAT THIS PRESENTATION COVERS
• Urban Growth Area (UGA) standards
• Complete Streets Policy (PMC 12.15)
• Right-of-way & future density needs
• Neighborhood Character
BACKGROUND
Pa
g
e
7
5
o
f
1
9
4
R-S-20 & R-S-12 MAP
Pa
g
e
7
6
o
f
1
9
4
CASE FOR THE EXEMPTION
Council's proposed exemption offers two genuine benefits worth weighing:
Curb, gutter, sidewalk & street light
installation adds significant per-lot costs to
new construction.
In areas with very low traffic volumes, these
costs may not be proportionate to immediate
need.
Lower up-front costs can incentivize single-
family construction and support housing
affordability.
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER
R-S-12 and R-15 are the City's lowest-density
residential zones, with rural or semi-rural
character.
Residents in these areas may prefer to preserve
the open, informal streetscape consistent with
large-lot living.
Requiring urban-style frontage improvements may
feel inconsistent with the existing character of
these neighborhoods.
LOWER DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Pa
g
e
7
7
o
f
1
9
4
URBAN GROWTH AREA (UGA) STANDARDS
City is actively working with County to develop UGA areas up to city infrastructure standards.
NEGOTIATING LEVERAGE AT RISK
The City's argument that
UGA areas must build to
city street standards is
undermined if Pasco itself
exempts its own zones from
those same standards. It is
difficult to require what the
City does not apply
internally.
CONSISTENCY WITH COMP PLAN
The Comprehensive Plan
calls for an interconnected
network of streets, trails,
and access ways and
encourages multi-modal
transportation. Exemptions
in RS zones create
permanent barriers to
achieving these stated
goals.
FUTURE ANNEXATION COSTS
When UGA areas are
eventually annexed with
substandard streets, the
City inherits the liability for
retrofitting infrastructure,
at significantly greater
expense than requiring
improvements at time of
initial development.
Pa
g
e
7
8
o
f
1
9
4
COMPLETE STREETS POLICY
In 2018, the Pasco City Council adopted Ordinance 4389 (Chapter 12.15 PMC) establishing a
Complete Streets Policy, committing to design streets that safely serve all users: pedestrians,
cyclists, transit riders, and motorists of all ages and abilities.
POLICY CONFLICT
Exempting R-S-12/R-15
from sidewalks and street
lights directly conflicts with
the Complete Streets Policy
EXCEPTION STANDARDS
PMC 12.15.040 allows
exemptions only when there
is a documented absence of
need, when implementation
is physically infeasible, or
when cost is excessively
disproportionate to benefit —
not as a blanket zone-wide
opt-out for developers.
•Creates a con
•Within City of Pasco
Transportation System Master
Plan, June 2022
•Creates a connected, multimodal
network
•Improves safety and accessibility
•Combines projects into one
coordinated system
•Implemented over time with
shared funding
BIKE & PED MASTER PLAN
Pa
g
e
7
9
o
f
1
9
4
RIGHT-OF-WAY & FUTURE DENSITY NEEDS
A key question for Council: Should the City require additional ROW dedication at time of
development to protect future options?
ROW ONCE —RETROFIT NEVER
Requiring ROW dedication at time of permit is
the City's only low-cost opportunity. Once a
home is built, acquiring additional ROW requires
costly condemnation or negotiation.
MIDDLE HOUSING DENSITY
HB 1110 allows 4-6 units per lot on existing RS
lots. Current ROW widths may be insufficient to
accommodate the curb, sidewalk, and utility
corridor that higher density will eventually
require.
SEWER LIFT STATIONS
Future growth in R-S-12/R-15 areas may require
sewer lift stations or utility easements. Without
additional ROW secured upfront, the City will
lack space for these facilities without expensive
land acquisition.
GMA INFRASTRUCTURE OBLIGATION
Under RCW 36.70A, the City must ensure
infrastructure is adequate to serve planned
growth. Failure to secure ROW now may mean
the City cannot demonstrate concurrency for
future development approvals.
Pa
g
e
8
0
o
f
1
9
4
SUMMARY
• Lower development costs for
R-S-12/R-15 builders
• Preserves semi-rural
neighborhood character
• Reduces per-permit burden on
individual property owners
today
• May incentivize housing
construction in large-lot zones
(including middle housing)
CONCERNS
•TIA policy may obscure traffic and
life safety issue awareness
• Undermines UGA City standard
arguments
• Conflicts with Complete Streets
Policy
• If HB 1110 increases density,
infrastructure won't keep up
• Loss of ROW opportunity for future
utility needs
• Pedestrian and traffic safety risks
from dark, sidewalk-free streets
✓BENEFITS
Pa
g
e
8
1
o
f
1
9
4
Discussion &
Questions
Pa
g
e
8
2
o
f
1
9
4
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 30, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Harold Stewart, City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 4849 - Creating Chapter 3.31 of the Pasco Municipal
Code – Local Income Tax
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Proposed Ordinance 4849
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4849 creating a new Chapter 3.31 of
the Pasco Municipal Code entitled "Local Income Tax," within title 3 "Revenue
and Finance" of the Pasco Municipal Code, to oppose a local income tax on
the residents and businesses of the City of Pasco providing for severability and
establishing an effective date.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Background
In February 2022, the Pasco City Council adopted Resolution No. 4150
expressing the City's opposition to a local income tax. During the 2026
Legislative legislation enacted Legislature Washington the Session, State
establishing a statewide personal income tax on certain high-income
individuals, representing a significant change in the State's historic tax
structure. In response, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4763
reaffirming the City's opposition to both state and local personal income taxes
in Washington State.
At the time the resolution was considered, Council also reviewed a proposed
ordinance that would codify the City's longstanding policy within the Pasco
Municipal Code. Council directed staff to return with the ordinance for formal
Page 83 of 194
consideration.
The proposed ordinance creates a new Chapter 3.31 of the Pasco Municipal
Code entitled "Local Income Tax." The ordinance formally prohibits the
imposition of a local income tax within the City of Pasco and codifies the City's
longstanding tax competitive and stable to maintaining commitment a
environment that supports economic development and business investment.
Impacts Other than Fiscal
The proposed ordinance has no immediate fiscal or operational impact. Rather,
it codifies the City's existing policy position regarding local income taxes within
the Pasco Municipal Code.
V. DISCUSSION:
Recommendation
Adopt the proposed ordinance creating Chapter 3.31 of the Pasco Municipal
Code entitled "Local Income Tax."
Constraints
The authority to authorize or prohibit local income taxes ultimately rests with
the Washington State Legislature and applicable constitutional law. Adoption of
this ordinance does not alter existing state law but formally establishes the
City's policy within the Pasco Municipal Code opposing the imposition of a local
income tax in the City of Pasco.
Next Steps
Upon adoption, the ordinance will be codified within the Pasco Municipal Code
and become effective five (5) days after passage and publication as required
by law.
Alternatives
Adopt the ordinance as presented.
Amend the ordinance
Take no action.
Page 84 of 194
Ordinance – Amending PMC, Creating Chapter 3.31 - 1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
CREATING A NEW CHAPTER 3.31, ENTITLED “LOCAL INCOME TAX,”
WITHIN TITLE 3, “REVENUE AND FINANCE” OF THE PASCO MUNICIPAL
CODE, AND RESIDENTS TAX ON THE INCOME A LOCAL TO OPPOSE
BUSINESSES OF THE CITY OF PASCO PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
AND ESTABLISHNG AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco is committed to fostering a strong local economy through a stable,
predictable, competitive tax environment that encourages investment, entrepreneurship, family-wage
employment, and long-term economic growth; and
WHEREAS, Washington State has historically relied upon a tax system consisting primarily of sales,
property, business and occupation, and excise taxes rather than a broad-based personal income tax; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council previously adopted Resolution No. 4150 in 2022 expressing its
opposition to the authorization and imposition of a local income tax, reaffirming the City's longstanding
commitment to maintaining a favorable business climate;
WHEREAS, during the 2026 Legislative Session, the Washington State Legislature enacted legislation
establishing a personal income tax on certain high-income individuals, representing a significant change in the
State's historic tax structure; and
WHEREAS, legislation has also been introduced in prior legislative sessions proposing to authorize
counties, cities, and towns to levy local personal income taxes under certain circumstances; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes that expanding reliance on personal income taxes, whether
imposed by the State or authorized by local governments, may discourage private investment, business
expansion, workforce attraction, and long-term economic development within communities such as Pasco; and
WHEREAS, the City Council remains committed to policies that promote economic opportunities,
encourage business retention and expansion, support workforce development, and maintain a tax environment
that provides certainty for residents, employers, and local governments.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That a new Chapter 3.31 entitled “Local Income Tax” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall
be and hereby is created and shall read as follows:
Chapter 3.31 Local
Income Tax
Sections:
3.31.010 Purpose.
Page 85 of 194
Ordinance – Amending PMC, Creating Chapter 3.31 - 2
3.31.020 Local Income Tax Banned.
3.31.010 Purpose.
The imposition of a local income tax on the businesses and residents of the City of Pasco is a direct conflict
with thethrough development economic promoting on City the value high the places attraction and
expansion of financially healthy, family wage paying employers. Small businesses are the foundation of
our that theimperative local, regional, state, and national it and economy is unnecessary put City not
obstacles in the way of their success.
3.31.020 Local Income Tax Prohibited.
No local income tax shall be imposed upon the Residents or Businesses of the City of Pasco.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and
publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this day of ,
2026.
Charles Grimm,
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Gabriela Sanchez, Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Published:
Page 86 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 16, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Craig Raymond, Deputy Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 4850 - Imposing a Six-Month Moratorium on Licenses
and Mining Cryptocurrency Centers, Data related to Permits New
Facilities, Blockchain Computing Facilities and Artificial Intelligence
Computing Facilities on
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Ordinance No. 4850
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4850, an ordinance of the City of
Pasco, Washington, imposing a six-month moratorium on the acceptance and
processing of business licenses and/or development permit applications
blockchain facilities, mining cryptocurrency data new to related centers,
computing facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and other high-
density computing facilities; setting forth preliminary findings in support of this
moratorium; declaring an emergency; establishing an immediate effective date;
authorizing publication by summary only; and directing staff to develop and
return to City Council with recommended land use regulations addressing the
permitting and licensing of these facilities within six months of adoption of the
moratorium.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Fiscal:
None anticipated at this time.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Background:
Permitting and construction of high-density computing facilities—including data
centers, cryptocurrency mining operations, blockchain computing facilities, and
artificial intelligence computing facilities—are rapidly expanding across the
Page 87 of 194
country, including in Washington State and within our region.
Under current Pasco Municipal Code, data centers are allowed by right in the
I-2 and I-3 zoning districts. They are subject only to the City’s general zoning
standards including but not limited to setbacks, height limits, lot coverage
requirements, noise limits, and other applicable concurrency requirements. No
data-center-specific conditions or regulations presently apply.
14318, Order Executive government issued the 2025, July In federal
Accelerating Federal Permitting of Data Center Infrastructure and America’s
Action Plan, underscoring the national economic and security significance of
data center infrastructure.
Impact (Other than Fiscal):
This will be a matter of significant public interest and will likely generate
community discussion and participation.
V. DISCUSSION:
Recommendation:
Given the pace, scale, and complexity of data center development—and
recognizing environmental demands and significant infrastructure their
impacts—staff recommends that the City of Pasco develop and adopt
should regulations These reflect land-use data-center-specific regulations.
community values, state and federal regulatory parameters, and the realities of
local infrastructure capacity.
Due to substantial public interest and anticipated community impacts, staff
further recommends that the City Council adopt a temporary moratorium on
new data center-related applications. This moratorium would remain in place
until appropriate regulations are developed and formally approved by Council
but no later than six months from the date of adoption.
Staff emphasizes the complexity of the issues and recommends a thoughtful,
deliberate approach to code development and transparent public engagement.
Next Steps:
1. Approve the attached ordinance establishing a six-month moratorium on
accepting data center-related development applications. This will
provide time for staff to prepare recommended land-use regulations and
conduct public engagement.
2. Hold a public hearing within 60 days of adopting the moratorium, as
required by State law.
3. Conduct additional public hearings to gather community feedback on
potential impacts and concerns.
Page 88 of 194
4. Direct staff to draft and present a recommended data center ordinance
no later than December 2026.
5. Council adopts ordinance and lifts moratorium no later than 6 months
following adoption of the moratorium.
Alternatives:
1. Council could direct staff to develop an interim/emergency ordinance
between the moratorium and final ordinance. This would minimize the
length of the moratorium, and the use of the interim ordinance is easier
to extend if necessary than the moratorium.
2. Council could decide to leave data centers minimally regulated by
existing Pasco Municipal Codes.
Page 89 of 194
4916-5781-4717, v. 1
ORDINANCE NO. __________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, IMPOSING A
SIX-MONTH MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE AND PROCESSING
OF BUSINESS LICENSES AND/OR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
APPLICATIONS RELATED TO NEW DATA CENTERS,
CRYPTOCURRENCY MINING FACILITIES, BLOCKCHAIN COMPUTING
FACILITIES, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPUTING FACILITIES, AND
OTHER HIGH-FACILITIESDENSITY COMPUTING SETTING ; FORTH
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF THIS MORATORIUM;
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE
EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING WITHIN 60
DAYS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
WHEREAS, the City Council has authority under Article XI, Section 11 of the
Washington State Constitution, RCW 35A.63.220, RCW 36.70A.200, and RCW 36.70A.390 to
regulate land uses and adopt interim zoning controls and moratoria; and
WHEREAS, the City anticipates future applications for data centers, cryptocurrency
mining facilities, blockchain computing facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and
other high-density computing facilities, demonstrating an immediate need to evaluate whether the
City's existing land use regulations adequately address these emerging uses; and
WHEREAS, the City has not previously adopted specific development regulations,
operational standards, or review criteria governing data centers, cryptocurrency mining facilities,
blockchain computing facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and other high-density
computing facilities, making it necessary to evaluate these uses before new applications are
accepted and processed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the public interest to temporarily suspend
the acceptance and processing of applications for these uses while the City evaluates appropriate
zoning classifications, development standards, review procedures, and operational performance
standards to ensure that future development is compatible with surrounding land uses and
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and long-term planning objectives; and
WHEREAS, data centers, cryptocurrency mining facilities, blockchain computing
facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and high-density computing facilities are
large-scale facilities that house computer servers, storage systems, and associated infrastructure
for processing, storing, and distributing digital data, and which typically require substantial land
area, structures, electrical power, water for cooling, and associated mechanical equipment; and
WHEREAS, the development of data centers, cryptocurrency mining facilities, blockchain
computing facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and high-density computing
facilities has increased significantly in recent years as demand for cloud computing, artificial
intelligence infrastructure, cryptocurrency mining, blockchain computing, and digital storage has
Page 90 of 194
4916-5781-4717, v. 1
grown nationally and regionally, including in eastern Washington due in part to access to low-cost
hydroelectric power; and
WHEREAS, data centers, cryptocurrency mining facilities, blockchain computing
facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and high-density computing facilities impose
unique and significant demands on local utility infrastructure, including electrical supply and water
systems, which may strain existing City infrastructure and service capacity; and
WHEREAS and code, zoning development regulations, City's the , existing
Comprehensive Plan were not specifically designed to address the scale, characteristics, and
potential impacts of data centers, cryptocurrency mining facilities, blockchain computing
facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and high-density computing facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also has determined that the City's current land use
regulations may be inadequate to address the land use, environmental, infrastructure, noise, and
compatibility impacts associated with the siting and operation of data centers, cryptocurrency
mining facilities, blockchain computing facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and
other high-density computing facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that additional time is necessary to develop a clear
review and approval process for data centers, cryptocurrency mining facilities, blockchain
computing facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and high-density computing
facilities, evaluate zoning regulations and development standards, evaluate public safety and
compatibility considerations, and adopt interim or permanent development regulations; and
WHEREAS, without a moratorium, business license and/or permit applications related to
data centers, cryptocurrency mining facilities, blockchain computing facilities, artificial
intelligence computing facilities, and high-density computing facilities could vest under existing
regulations that do not contain criteria or review procedures; and
WHEREAS, the City Council intends to study regulations for data centers, cryptocurrency
mining facilities, blockchain computing facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and
high-density computing facilities with input from the Planning Commission, staff, and the
community; and
WHEREAS, a temporary moratorium is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and
welfare while the City develops appropriate regulations; and
WHEREAS, a moratorium will allow the City time to study the characteristics and impacts
of data centers, solicit public input, consult with affected utilities and agencies, and develop land
use regulations that appropriately address data center development in a manner consistent with the
City's Comprehensive Plan and community objectives; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the adoption of this moratorium is necessary as
an emergency measure to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare and to protect the integrity
of the City's land use planning process pending the development of appropriate standards; and
Page 91 of 194
4916-5781-4717, v. 1
WHEREAS, this ordinance is intended to include necessary supporting recitals
incorporated as findings of fact, impose a moratorium on acceptance and processing of
applications related to data centers, cryptocurrency mining facilities, blockchain computing
facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and high-density computing facilities, exempt
vested applications, establish a six-month duration, require a public hearing within 60 days, and
declare an emergency establishing an immediate effective date.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings of Fact. The recitals set forth above are adopted as the City
Council’s initial findings of fact in support of the moratorium established by this ordinance.
Section 2. Declaration of Emergency. The City Council declares this moratorium to
be an emergency measure necessary for the immediate protection of public health, safety, property,
and welfare.
Section 3. Moratorium Imposed. Pursuant to Article XI, Section 11 of the Washington
State Constitution, RCW 35A.63.220, and RCW 36.70A.390, the City hereby imposes a temporary
moratorium on the acceptance and processing of development permit applications related to data
centers, cryptocurrency mining facilities, blockchain computing facilities, artificial intelligence
computing facilities, and high-density computing facilities. This moratorium applies to, but is not
limited to, business license applications, building permit applications, conditional use permit
applications, site plan review applications, binding site plan applications, subdivision and short
subdivision applications, pre-application conferences, and any other land-use approvals or
development permit applications related to data centers, cryptocurrency mining facilities,
blockchain computing facilities, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and high-density
computing facilities.
Section 4. Effect on Vested Rights. This moratorium applies prospectively only and does
not affect applications determined to be complete prior to the effective date of this ordinance.
Section 5. Duration of Moratorium. This moratorium shall remain in effect for six (6)
months from the date of adoption unless extended in accordance with RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW
36.70A.390 or replaced by interim or permanent regulations.
Section 6. Public Hearing. The City Council shall hold a public hearing within sixty (60)
days of adoption of this ordinance to receive public testimony and consider additional findings of
fact.
Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word
of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this
ordinance.
Page 92 of 194
4916-5781-4717, v. 1
Section 8. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including scrivener’s errors
or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulation s; or
numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon
adoption.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of _____,
202_.
Charles Grimm
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Published: _____________________________
Page 93 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 12, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Brent Cook, Police Chief
Police Department
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4766 - Washington State University and the City of
Pasco Research Footage Camera Body-Worn for Use the of for
Purposes.
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution No. 4766
Data Use Agreement between Washington State University and City of Pasco
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Motion: I move to approve Resolution No. 4766, authorizing the City Manager
to execute an Agreement between the City of Pasco and Washington State
University for the use of Pasco Police Department body-worn camera footage
for approved academic research purposes.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this agreement. The research
project is being conducted by Washington State University (WSU) and does
not require funding from the City of Pasco.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Background:
WSU has requested access to a limited sample of Pasco Police Department
body-worn camera footage for an approved academic research project.
The purpose of the study is to examine police-citizen interactions,
communication, and procedural justice during contacts between law
enforcement officers and members of the public. The project will involve
reviewing, coding, and analyzing selected body-worn camera footage and
preparing a summary report of the findings.
Page 94 of 194
The proposed Data Use Agreement establishes the terms and conditions
governing WSU's access to the footage, including confidentiality requirements,
data security measures, background check requirements, and restrictions on
the use and disclosure of information. The Pasco Police Department will retain
ownership of all records provided under the agreement.
Impact (other than fiscal):
The proposed research is expected to provide the Pasco Police Department
with objective information regarding police-public interactions that may assist in
evaluating practices, enhancing training opportunities, and supporting
continued efforts to strengthen public trust and professional service.
The agreement also supports collaboration between local government and
higher education institutions to advance research related to public safety and
law enforcement practices.
V. DISCUSSION:
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the Resolution and authorization for the City
Manager State Washington with Agreement execute the to Interagency
University.
Constraints (Time or other considerations):
The agreement must be executed before any data may be shared with WSU.
All access to body-worn camera footage will be subject to the terms and
conditions outlined in the Data Use Agreement and applicable state and federal
laws governing public records, privacy, and criminal justice information.
Next Steps:
City Council approval of the Resolution
City Manager executes the Interagency Agreement.
Pasco Police Department coordinates with WSU regarding secure
access to approved footage.
WSU conducts the research project and provides a summary report of
findings upon completion.
Alternatives:
Deny approval of the Interagency Agreement and decline participation in
the research project.
Direct staff to negotiate modifications to the agreement and return to
Council for future consideration.
Page 95 of 194
Table consideration of the agreement pending additional information or
discussion.
Page 96 of 194
Resolution - _____ ILA - 1
Version 1.9.26
RESOLUTION NO. ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN INTERAGENCY
AGREEMENT BETWEEN WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY AND THE
CITY OF PASCO FOR THE USE OF BODY-WORN CAMERA FOOTAGE FOR
RESEARCH PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, RCW 39.34, INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT, authorizes political
subdivisions to jointly exercise their powers, privileges, or authorities with other political
subdivisions of this state through the execution of an interlocal cooperative or interagency
agreement; and,
WHEREAS, Washington State University ("WSU") has requested access to certain Pasco
Police Department body-worn camera footage for approved academic research regarding police-
citizen interactions, including the evaluation of respectful and professional conduct during contacts
between law enforcement officers and members of the public; and
WHEREAS, terms, conditions, the establishes Use proposed Data the Agreement
confidentiality requirements, and security measures governing WSU's access to and use of such
footage for research purposes; and
WHEREAS, the proposed research is expected to provide the Pasco Police Department
with objective information regarding police- evaluating public interactions that may assist in
practices, enhancing training opportunities, and supporting continued efforts to strengthen public
trust and professional service; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has determined that it is
in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into the Interagency Agreement with Washington
State University for the authorized use of body-worn camera footage for research purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council approves the terms and conditions of the Interagency Agreement
between Washington State University and the City of Pasco, a copy of which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit A; and
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to sign and execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of
Pasco.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 97 of 194
Resolution - _____ ILA - 2
Version 1.9.26
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of
________________, 2026.
Charles Grimm
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Gabriela Sanchez Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 98 of 194
WSU DUA – Pasco Police Department
Page 1 of 8
DATA USE AGREEMENT
ORSO# 142041-003
I. PARTIES
1.1 THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between
Washington State University (“WSU”), an institution of higher education and an
agency of the state of Washington, and Pasco Police Department (“Department”).
In this Agreement, the above entities are jointly referred to as PARTIES.
II. PURPOSE
2.1 This Agreement provides the terms and conditions for a project which is of mutual
interest and benefit to WSU and the Department.
2.2 The performance of such a sponsored project is consistent, compatible, and
beneficial to the academic role and mission of WSU as an institution of higher
education.
2.3 Washington State University desires access for approved research to certain body
camera footage created by the Department (“Footage”), which is part of the
Department’s law enforcement records owned and retained by the Department.
This Footage includes de-identifiable information about those on the footage and
is provided only for use in accordance with the use and storage conditions in this
Agreement.
III. DEFINITIONS
3.1 “WSU Project Director(s)” shall be Dr. David A. Makin, a WSU employee,
designated by WSU to be the primary research contact with the Department.
3.2 “Agency Liaison” shall be Interim Chief of Police Brent Cook, a Department
employee, designated by the Department to be the primary contact with the Project
Director.
3.3 “Scope of Work” shall mean the sponsored project, under the direction of the
Project Director, described in Attachment A–Scope of Work.
3.4 "Confidential Information" shall mean information in written, graphic, oral, or other
tangible form protected by trade secret or other right of nondisclosure, including
without limitation algorithms, formulae, techniques, improvements, technical
drawings and data, and computer software, subject to applicable law.
3.5 “Copyright” shall mean any work developed under the Scope of Work that is
subject to copyright under copyright law.
Page 99 of 194
WSU DUA – Pasco Police Department
Page 2 of 8
3.6 “Proprietary Information” means all data, sequences, and any other information
obtained or developed during the course of the Scope of Work, subject to
applicable law.
3.7 “Trademark” shall mean any trade or service marks developed under the Scope of
Work whether or not registered under either state or federal trademark law.
IV. SCOPE OF WORK
4.1 The Department acknowledges that this Agreement is for the performance of the
Scope of Work as defined in Section 3.3 of this Agreement which shall be entitled,
“Analysis of Police Citizen Interactions with the Public.
V. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the PARTIES
agree to the following terms and conditions.
5.1 Period of Performance. The specific period of performance for the Scope of Work
shall be upon execution of this Agreement to June 25, 2029, unless a time
extension is mutually agreed upon in writing between the PARTIES in accordance
with Section 5.15, Amendments.
5.2 Equipment. (RESERVED)
5.3 Key Personnel. The WSU Project Director may select and supervise other project
staff as needed to perform the Scope of Work. No other person will be substituted
for the Project Director except with the consent of the Department. The Project
Director and the Agency Liaison shall mutually define the frequency and nature of
these communications.
5.4 Confidential Information.
5.4.1 To the extent allowed by law, WSU and the Department agree to use
reasonable of disclosure care avoid to unauthorized Confidential
Information, including, without limitation, taking measures to prevent
creating a premature bar to a United States or foreign patent application.
Each party will limit access to Confidential Information received from
another party hereto to those persons having a need to know. Each party
shall empl in storing, receiving, safeguards oy same the reasonable
transmitting, and using Confidential Information that prudent organizations
normally exercise with respect to their own confidential information of
significant value.
5.4.2 oral graphic, written, include or Information Confidential shall
communication. Confidential Information shall not be disclosed by the
receiving party to a third party for a period of five (5) years from receipt of
such information or until a patent is pu Confidential blished or the
Information is published by the disclosing party or unless the disclosing and
receiving parties agree otherwise and in writing at the time of disclosure.
Third parties shall include all governmental offices.
Page 100 of 194
WSU DUA – Pasco Police Department
Page 3 of 8
5.4.3 Confidential Information shall not include information which:
5.4.3.1 was in the receiving party's possession prior to receipt of the
disclosed information;
5.4.3.2 is or becomes a matter of public knowledge through no fault
of the receiving party.
5.4.3.3 is received from a third party without a duty of confidentiality.
5.4.3.4 is independently developed by the receiving party.
5.4.3.5 is required to be disclosed under operation of law.
5.4.3.6 is reasonably ascertained by WSU or the Department to
create a risk to a trial subject or to public health and safety.
5.4.4 of state the of institution educational an as that understood is It
Washington, WSU is subject to Washington state laws and regulations, including
the Washington Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW. It is also understood that
the Department is subject to the Public Records Act. If a Public Disclosure Act
request is made to view Department’s Confidential Information, WSU will promptly
notify Department of the request, such that Department has the opportunity to seek
a court order enjoining disclosure. WSU will work collaboratively Department to
identify any applicable exemption(s) to disclosure and appropriately redact the
information to be released. The release of data will be limited to only those records
that must be released to comply with the request.
5.5 Safeguards and Security Measures.
5.5.1 The safeguards and security measures in this section are to preserve the
confidentiality and security of the data within the files that are the subject
of this Agreement. WSU agrees to adopt, at minimum, the security
safeguards and procedures described in this section.
5.5.2 WSU shall access and code video Footage only through the Evidence.com
system and shall employ the following protocols and restrictions to ensure
the confidentiality of the Footage.
5.5.3 Each individual researcher or coder that Dr. David A. Makin authorizes to
access the Footage must complete CITI training on Human Subject
Research as required by the WSU Institutional Review Board; sign an
individual confidentiality agreement; receive a background check CJIS
Level 2 certification; and be cleared to participate by the Department.
Fingerprinting and background checks will be provided by the Pullman
Police Department.
5.5.4 All coders who while accessing the Footage encounter any image or other
identifiable information regarding a person with whom they are personally
acquainted shall stop coding immediately and report the incident to Dr.
David A. Makin and the lab manager. Dr. David A. Makin shall assign
another coder to code the video.
Page 101 of 194
WSU DUA – Pasco Police Department
Page 4 of 8
5.5.5 According to the approved WSU Institutional Review Board, encrypted de-
identified data shall refer to the confidential linked ID, which is generated
in the data. This confidential linked ID de-identifies the officer, ensuring the
data and any performed analysis cannot be tracked to a specific agency or
officer.
5.5.6 WSU will be provided access to the footage only via Evidence.com. Limited
Access accounts will be provided via individual accounts to access the
Evidence.com system. Access shall require two-stage authentication and
IP logging. To the extent practicable, WSU will use IP verification of the
computer to enable only the computers in Dr. David A. Makin’s laboratory
to access Evidence.com. Coders will then review the footage through
Evidence.com. They will not be able to download any information from
within the system. No video information will be stored on the WSU network
files and will be encrypted as set forth above.
5.5.7 Limited access accounts will be provided for each coder such that a coder
will have access to only videos from the Department’s Use of Force,
Criminal Code Violations, and Traffic categories. If any researcher or coder
encounters any portion of the Footage recorded inside a home or medical
facility, the coder shall discontinue access to the Footage and report this to
Dr. Makin. Dr. Makin will ensure those portions of the Footage are made
unavailable to the researchers and coders.
5.5.8 To the extent not in conflict with this Agreement, the security terms in the
protocol for the approved research shall also be adhered to and are
incorporated in this Agreement as if set out in full.
5.6 Publication. WSU reserves the right to publish or permit to be published by WSU
employees the results of the Scope of Work undertaken by WSU employees. To
prevent untimely disclosure or exploitation of the Department’s Confidential
Information, WSU shall provide the Agency Liaison with a copy of any proposed
publication resulting from the Scope of Work at least thirty (30) days prior to
submission for publication. The Department shall have thirty (30) days (the "Pre-
publication Review Period") from receipt of the draft to review the proposed
publication. If the Department determines that Department Confidential
Information is included in the proposed publication, WSU will at the Department’s
request remove the Department’s Confidential Information prior to submission for
publication. If the proposed draft publication contains Department Confidential
Information, the Department may request that WSU’s submission of the draft for
publication be delayed for up to sixty (60) days beyond the end of the Pre-
publication Review Period. If the Department seeks to delay publication, the
Department shall make such request in writing prior to the expiration of the Pre-
publication or information the of Review with together Period identification
materials of concern and reasons why delay is warranted. Department may delay
publication by ninety (90) days to allow WSU or the Department, as the case may
be, to seek patent protection.
5.7 Publicity. The Department shall not include the name of Washington State
University, WSU, Washington State University Research Foundation, WSURF, or
any of either entity’s Trademarks in any advertising, sales promotion, or other
Page 102 of 194
WSU DUA – Pasco Police Department
Page 5 of 8
publicity matter without prior written approval of the President of WSU or their
designee.
5.8 Termination for Convenience. This Agreement may be terminated by either party
hereto upon written notice delivered to the other party at least thirty (30) days prior
to the intended date of termination. By such termination, neither party may nullify
obligations already incurred prior to the date of termination.
5.9 Termination for Cause. In the event either party shall commit any material breach
of or default in any terms or conditions of this Agreement, and also shall fail to
remedy such default or breach within sixty (60) days after receipt of written notice
thereof, the non-breaching party may, at its option and in addition to any other
remedies which it may have at law or in equity, terminate this Agreement by
sending notice of termination in writing to the other party to that effect. Termination
shall be effective as of the day of receipt of such notice.
5.10 Termination Obligations. Termination of this Agreement shall not relieve either
party of any obligations incurred prior to the date of termination.
5.11 Data Rights. Copyright in all material created by WSU and paid for by the
Department as part of this Agreement shall be the property of WSU, subject to
applicable law. Both the Department and WSU may use these materials for
research purposes. This material includes, but is not limited to: books, computer
programs, documents, films, pamphlets, reports, sound reproductions, studies,
surveys, tapes, and/or training materials. Material which WSU provides and uses
to perform this Agreement but which is not created for or paid for by the
Department shall be owned by WSU or such other party as determined by
Copyright Law and/or WSU’s internal policies; however, for any such materials,
WSU herby grants (or, if necessary and to the extent reasonably possible, shall
obtain and grant) a perpetual, royalty free, non-exclusive research license to the
Department to use the material for the Department’s non-commercial internal
purposes.
5.12 Dispute Resolution. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, when a
dispute arises between the PARTIES and it cannot be resolved by direct
negotiation, any party may request a dispute resolution panel (DRP). A request for
a DRP must be in writing, state the disputed issues(s), state the relative positions
of the PARTIES, and be sent to all PARTIES. PARTIES must provide a response
within thirty (30) days unless the PARTIES mutually agree to an extension of time.
Each party shall designate a representative. The representatives shall mutually
select an additional member. The DRP shall evaluate the facts, Agreement terms,
and applicable statutes and rules and make a determination by majority vote. The
decision is binding on the PARTIES.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the PARTIES’ choice of a
mutually acceptable dispute resolution method in addition to the dispute resolution
procedure outlined above.
5.13 Disclaimer. WSU MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY AS TO THE
CONDITIONS OF THE SCOPE OF WORK, SPONSORED PROJECT OR ANY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, GENERATED INFORMATION, OR PRODUCT
MADE OR DEVELOPED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, OR THE OWNERSHIP,
Page 103 of 194
WSU DUA – Pasco Police Department
Page 6 of 8
MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF THE
SPONSORED PROJECT, SCOPE OF WORK, OR RESULTING PRODUCT.
5.14 Indemnity. Each party to this Agreement agrees to be responsible for the liabilities
arising out of their own conduct and the conduct of their officers, employees, and
agents.
5.15 Amendments. This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement of the
PARTIES. Such amendments shall be in writing and signed by personnel
authorized to bind each of the PARTIES.
5.16 Assignment. The work to be provided under this Agreement, and any claim arising
hereunder, is not assignable or delegable by either party in whole or in part, without
the express prior written consent of the other party, which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
5.17 Notices. Any notice or communication required or permitted under this Agreement
shall be delivered by overnight courier, or by registered or certified mail, postage
prepaid and addressed to the party to receive such notice at the address given
below or such other address as may hereafter be designated by notice in writing.
Notice given hereunder shall be effective as of the date of receipt of such notice:
WSU:
Name/Title: David A. Makin Phone: (509) 335-2455
Address: Washington State University
Department of Criminal Justice
719 Johnson Tower Email: dmakin@wsu.edu
City/State/Zip: Pullman, WA 99164-3140
CITY:
Name/Title: Brent Cook/Interim Chief of Police Phone: (509) 545-3437
Address: 215 W. Sylvester
Email: cookb@pasco-wa.gov
City/State/Zip: Pasco, WA 99301
5.18 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance
with the laws of the state of Washington and the venue of any action brought
hereunder shall be in the Superior Court of Whitman County.
5.19 Compliance with Laws. The Department understands that WSU and the
Department are subject to United States laws and federal regulations, including
the export of technical data, computer software, laboratory prototypes and other
commodities (including the Arms Export Control Act, as amended, and the Export
Administration Act of 1979), and that the Department’s and WSU’s obligations
hereunder are contingent upon compliance with applicable United States laws and
regulations, including those for export control.
5.20 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or any provision of any document
incorporated by reference shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the
other provisions of this Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid
Page 104 of 194
WSU DUA – Pasco Police Department
Page 7 of 8
provision, if such remainder conforms to the requirements of applicable law and
the fundamental purpose of this Agreement, and to this end the provisions of this
Agreement are declared to be severable.
5.21 Order of Precedence. In the event of an inconsistency in this Agreement, the
inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order:
1. Applicable statutes and regulations;
2. Terms and Conditions contained in the basic Agreement;
3. Attachment A–Scope of Work;
4. Any other provisions incorporated by reference or otherwise into this
Agreement.
5.22 Complete Agreement. This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions
agreed upon by the PARTIES. No other understandings, oral or otherwise,
regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind
any of the PARTIES hereto.
5.23 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the
same Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed this Agreement as of the later of
the signature dates included below.
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY PASCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Name: Maria Hernandez Name: Harold Stewart
Title: AVP of Research Operations Title: City Manager
Date: Date:
Page 105 of 194
WSU DUA – Pasco Police Department
Page 8 of 8
ATTACHMENT A – SCOPE OF WORK
ORSO # 141780-005
The proposed Scope of Work involves coding body-worn camera (“BWC”) footage of police
interactions to understand the objective use of procedural justice and presence of incivility
associated with police contacts. WSU will perform the following tasks:
1. Develop an objective instrument benchmarking the presence of procedural justice and
incivility.
2. View, code, and analyze a sample of incidents involving police contacts with members of
the public.
The proposed work will be completed over the period of this Agreement. See, Section 5.1 of the
Agreement. This research has received approval by the WSU IRB. Pending funding, proposed
corresponding activities and deliverables include:
Effort 1: Coding of BWC Footage
• View, code, and analyze interactions associated with police contacts.
Effort 2: Data Analysis
• Data cleaning and preparation.
• Data analysis.
• Result evaluation.
Effort 3 Summary Report
• Submit a summary report of the benchmarking activity.
Page 106 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 6, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Maria Serra, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4767 - Approval for Application to Public Works Board
for Pre-Construction Funding for Butterfield WTP Land Acquisition
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution No. 4767
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.4767, authorizing the submittal of a
Public Works Board Pre-Construction Loan Application for the Butterfield WTP
Land Acquisition.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
The City is pursuing a pre-construction loan from the Washington State
Public Works Board (PWB) program. The PWB loan is a low interest loan that
can be used for all any activity preceding construction. As currently advertised,
the maximum award amount is $1 million per jurisdiction per year in this
program. The loan has a 5-year term with an effective interest rate of 0.93%.
for distressed communities. Since the City of Pasco meets the criteria for
distressed community, up to 15% of the sought award could be in the form of a
grant.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Background
The City’s potable water is provided by two different water treatment plants.
The Butterfield Water Treatment Plant (WTP) was originally constructed in
1946 and produces approximately three-quarters of the City’s drinkable water.
The Butterfield WTP provides treated water that is critical for residents,
businesses, industrial users, and fire suppression systems. Drinking water
plants have a typical service life of 50-80 years. Although the Butterfield WTP
Page 107 of 194
has undergone several expansions and upgrades since its original
construction, most of the core components of the plant were constructed
between 65 and 75 years ago.
The Butterfield WTP Facility Plan (Plan) was completed by Carollo Engineers.
The development of the Plan involved a multi-year process that established
performance goals for the plant, reviewed past water quality issues, evaluated
plant performance and condition, evaluated alternatives for plant processes,
and developed a Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) that included repair and
replacement projects for the Butterfield WTP. The design engineering team,
Jacobs, has begun work on the first set of improvements ("Early Works"), with
additional phases forthcoming.
The next step of the project includes the acquisition of land to place the new
plant. A Burlington Northern Santa-Fe (BNSF) railroad owned property has
been identified for acquisition. This property is located near the existing
Butterfield Raw Water Pump Station and Drying Beds. It is the intent to place
the new facility in this property, as doing so will decrease the likelihood of
interruptions to service at the existing Butterfield WTP during construction and
will represent saving by not having to construct around the existing operating
plant in a more complex sequence.
Impact
The PWB Traditional Programs makes funds available to counties, cities, and
special purpose districts to repair, replace, or create infrastructure. Projects
funded through this program are subject to state laws and regulations.
Applications for the PWB Loan Program require authorization of the legislative
body. Should the City be selected as a recipient for a PWB pre-construction
loan, the loan agreement will be subject to Council review and approval.
V. DISCUSSION:
Recommendation
Staff recommends authorization for submission of a low-interest loan
application to the Washington State Department of Commerce Public Works
Board program for land acquisition activities for the Butterfield WTP project.
Council action, in the form of a resolution, is sufficient to meet funding
application requirements. This action is consistent with proposed path forward
in proposed rate analysis, targeting $80 million in low interest loans for water
infrastructure in the next few years.
Constraints
The deadline for this cycle of PWB funding is July 31st, 2026.
Next Steps
Page 108 of 194
If approved, City staff will proceed in submitting an application to the
Washington State Department of Commerce PWB program.
Alternatives
Council may deny authorization and direct staff to find alternative
funding mechanisms for the project, or wait to next year's call for
projects. In that case, all work on this PWB loan application would be
halted/rescheduled accordingly.
Page 109 of 194
Resolution - _____ - 1
Version 1.9.26
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A PUBLIC WORKS BOARD PRE-
CONSTRUCTION LOAN APPLICATION FOR THE BUTTERFIELD WATER
TREATMENT PLANT LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the Butterfield Water Treatment Plant (Butterfield WTP), originally built in
1946, is nearing the end of its forecasted service life, and a newly constructed plant is proposed;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) adopted the Butterfield WTP Facilities Plan, which
defines a capital improvement strategy to address capacity, water quality, and end-of-life
deficiencies; and
WHEREAS, the City is requesting permission to submit an application for a low-interest
pre-construction loan with the Public Works Board (PWB) to fund the acquisition of land to place
the newly constructed WTP; and
WHEREAS, the PWB Pre- makes funds Construction and Construction Loan Program
available to counties, cities, and special purpose districts to repair, replace, or create infrastructure.
This program is funded through federal and state money and subject to state and federal
regulations; and
WHEREAS, the PWB loan application process requires documentation of City Council
approval of the submittal of a PWB loan application; and
WHEREAS, as currently advertised, PWB pre-construction loans have a 0.93% distressed
interest rate; and
WHEREAS, if the City is selected as a recipient for the PWB pre-construction loan, the
loan agreement will be subject to City Council review and approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council, of the City of Pasco, hereby authorizes the submittal of the pre-
construction loan application to the PWB for the Butterfield WTP Land Acquisition Project.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 110 of 194
Resolution - _____ - 2
Version 1.9.26
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this 20th day of July,
2026.
Charles Grimm
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Gabriela Sanchez Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 111 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4768 – Right-of-Way Dedication and Reimbursement
Agreement
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution 4768
Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION:City the authorizing 4768, No. Resolution approve to move I
Manager to execute right-of-way dedication and reimbursement agreement Big
Sky Developers LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company for additional
right-of-way dedication along Convention Drive.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
General Fund - Approximately $516,424.05
2025-2026 Biennium budget includes $500,000 for this purpose. Remainder of
the funds would need to be supplemented during the budget adjustment
process.
City-led future a that estimated For City former the context, Engineer
realignment of the Burns Road and Convention Drive intersection would cost
approximately $2 million. The proposed acquisition secures the needed right-
of-way at a fraction of that cost.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Background
The intersection of Burns Road and Convention Drive is currently
misaligned City posing future traffic flow challenges. The former
Engineer estimated a City-led correction at approximately $2 million.
Realigning Convention Drive North of Burns Road would require
Page 112 of 194
relocating high-voltage utility poles to the north, an approach that is
cost-prohibitive and carries substantial risk given the complexity of the
infrastructure involved.
Staff recommended that the developer of the parcel in the northeast
quadrant of the intersection acquire right-of-way and/or easement in the
northwest quadrant to facilitate alignment without correcting the
alignment.
The Developer constructs Convention Drive to a complete standard City
cross-section, the for required otherwise dedication the exceeding
development.
The proposed Agreement documents the Parties’ obligations regarding
construction, dedication, acceptance, and payment for the Additional
Dedication Area – generally the far side of the street, estimated at
58,353 square feet.
The Developer remains solely responsible for all design, permitting,
construction, City’s the costs; and bonding, inspection, warranty
payment obligation is limited to the Additional Dedication Area only.
Impact (other than fiscal)
Acquisition of the Additional Dedication Area allows Convention Drive to be in a
complete, alignment at intersection correcting configuration, standard the
Burns Road and directly improving public safety, traffic circulation, access, and
long-term now street maintainability. Aligning the intersection preserves
flexibility for future developments north of Burns Road, positioning the City to
accommodate growth safely and cost-efficiently.
V. DISCUSSION:
Recommendation
Staff recommends Council approve the Resolution authorizing the City
and execute Reimbursement Dedication Manager the to Right-of-Way
Agreement. The partnership addresses critical safety concerns at a misaligned
intersection, avoids costly infrastructure challenges the City would otherwise
face, and ensures the street is built to City standards while sharing the financial
burden in a cost-efficient manner.
Constraints (time or other consideration)
The City’s payment obligation arises only after all conditions precedent are
met, and the final payment amount depends on the surveyed square footage of
the Additional Dedication Area but Council's approval is needed to provide
predictability for the Developer.
Next Steps
If approved, the City Manager will execute the Agreement. The Developer will
complete deliver the improvements, dedication required the street or
Page 113 of 194
conveyance documents and acceptable title evidence, and record the
dedication. Upon satisfaction of all conditions precedent, the City will remit
payment within thirty (30) days and formally accept the right-of-way.
Alternatives
1. Direct staff to renegotiate the terms of the Agreement, including the per-
square-foot rate or conditions of payment.
2. Provide staff with alternate direction.
3. Do not approve the Agreement.
Page 114 of 194
Resolution - ____ Agreement - 1
Version 1.9.26
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE RIGHT-OF-WAY
DEDICATION AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BIG SKY
WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY A DEVELOPERS LLC,
FOR ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION ALONG CONVENTION
DRIVE..
WHEREAS, a and plat condition of as (City) requires Pasco City of the developers,
development approvals and pursuant to the Pasco Municipal Code, development standards, and
applicable permit approvals, to design, construct, and dedicate certain street frontage, right-of-
way, and public improvements adjacent to or serving their developments; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that acquisition of additional right-of-way along
Convention Drive, beyond the dedication otherwise required for the development of Glacier Park
Phase 1, Tract D (Franklin County Parcel No. 114330193), serves a public municipal purpose by
allowing Convention Drive standard complete cross constructed to a to be -section, improving
public circulation, access, maintenance, and long-term street functionality;; and
WHEREAS, under the Right-of-Way Dedication and Reimbursement Agreement, Big Sky
Developers LLC (Developer) will voluntarily dedicate the additional right-of-way area, estimated
at approximately 58,353 square feet, and the City will compensate the Developer at $8.85 per
square foot of the final dedicated area, an estimated total of $516,424.05, payable only after all
conditions precedent are satisfied, including the required street improvements, completion of
recording of the dedication, and delivery of acceptable title; and
WHEREAS, due City after Pasco, Washington, has of the Council City the of
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into a Right-of-
Way Dedication and Reimbursement Agreement with Big Sky Developers LLC.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the Right-
of-Way and Reimbursement Dedication Agreement and Pasco between the City of Sky Big
Developers LLC as attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Pasco.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 115 of 194
Resolution - ____ Agreement - 2
Version 1.9.26
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of
________________, 20__.
Charles Grimm
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 116 of 194
{DPK4904-5952-6841;1/13206.000004/}
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
This Right-of-Way Dedication and Reimbursement Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as
of July 20, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Pasco, a Washington municipal
corporation and (“City”), LLC, Developers Big Sky company limited a Washington liability
(“Developer”). The City and Developer are each a “Party” and collectively the “Parties.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Developer owns or controls certain real property located within the City
commonly known as Glacier Park Phase 2and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto
(“Property”); and
WHEREAS, Developer has applied for or received City approval to subdivide and develop
the Property as Glacier Park Phase 2 Plat (“Plat” or “Development”); and
WHEREAS, as a condition of the Plat and under the City’s municipal code, development
standards, required and construct, design, is to approvals, permit applicable and Developer
dedicate to the City certain street frontage, right-of-way, and public improvements adjacent to
or serving the Development (“Required Street Improvements”); and
WHEREAS, Developer is voluntarily choosing to construct Convention Drive at a width,
alignment, or the required for otherwise dedication area exceeds configuration that the
Development; and
WHEREAS, the chosen construction of Convention Drive will reflect a complete cross-
section of the City’s standard street design when complete; and
WHEREAS, the additional right-of-way dedication area is generally located on the far side
of the Street and is approximately one-half of that far-side area, as depicted in Exhibit B
(“Additional Dedication Area”). The final area shall be determined by the approved civil plans,
final plat, record of survey, or other conveyance document approved by the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that acquisition of the Additional Dedication Area
serves a public municipal purpose by allowing the Street to be constructed and dedicated in a
standard or more complete configuration, improving public circulation, access, maintenance, and
long-term street functionality; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to document their respective obligations regarding
construction, dedication, acceptance, and payment for the Additional Dedication Area.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the
Parties agree as follows:
Page 117 of 194
{DPK4904-5952-6841;1/13206.000004/}
1. Definitions
For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms have the meanings set forth below.
1.1 Additional Dedication Area means the portion of the right-of-way or real property
interest that is not otherwise required to be dedicated by Developer as a condition of the
Plat or Development, but that Developer voluntarily will dedicate or convey to the City
so or alignment, width, agreed standard Street may constructed at be that the the
configuration. The Additional Dedication Area is generally depicted in Exhibit B and shall
be plat, right approved final established by finally the -of-way dedication document,
statutory warranty deed, easement, or other instrument approved by the City.
1.2 Required Dedication Area means all portions of the Property, right-of-way, easements,
or other real property interests that Developer is required to improve, dedicate, convey,
and/or permit code, City Plat, the condition of Development, as City the to grant a
approvals, frontage improvement obligations, SEPA mitigation, or other applicable
requirements, excluding the Additional Dedication Area. The Required Dedication Area is
generally depicted in Exhibit B and shall be finally established by the approved final plat,
right-of-way or other easement, deed, warranty statutory document, dedication
instrument approved by the City.
1.3 Required Street Improvements means all street, frontage, utility, stormwater, sidewalk,
curb, public related signage, control, and landscaping, illumination, gutter, traffic
improvements required for the Plat or Development under City code, standards, permit
approvals, or approved civil plans.
1.4 Street Improvements means the Required Street Improvements together with any
additional improvements necessary to construct the Street in the configuration shown
on the approved plans. The City’s payment obligation under this Agreement is limited to
payment does for payment include not and for Dedication Additional the Area
construction, labor, materials, utility relocation, design, permitting, inspection, bonding,
maintenance, or other improvement costs.
2. Developer’s Street Construction Obligations
2.1 No Reduction of Development Obligations. This Agreement does not reduce, waive, or
modify code, Developer’s obligations under the Plat, Development approvals, City
frontage improvement requirements, utility standards, stormwater requirements, SEPA
mitigation, or any other applicable requirement, except as expressly stated herein.
2.2 Developer Cost Responsibility. Except for the City’s payment obligation for the Additional
Dedication Area under Section 4, Developer shall be solely responsible for all costs
associated with the design, permitting, construction, inspection, testing, bonding,
warranty, correction, maintenance, and dedication of the Street Improvements.
Page 118 of 194
{DPK4904-5952-6841;1/13206.000004/}
2.3 No City Construction Obligation. The City is not obligated to design, construct, manage,
or supervise the Street Improvements. City review, inspection, or approval of plans or
improvements shall not relieve Developer of responsibility for compliance with applicable
requirements or for defects, deficiencies, or nonconforming work.
3. Dedication and Conveyance
3.1 Required Dedication Area. Developer shall dedicate or convey the Required Dedication
Area to the City at no cost to the City, as required by the Plat, Development approvals,
City code, and applicable law.
3.2 Additional Dedication Area. Developer voluntarily agrees to dedicate or convey the
Additional Dedication Area to the City in exchange for the payment described in Section
4, subject to all conditions precedent in this Agreement.
3.3 Method of Dedication or Conveyance. The Additional Dedication Area shall be dedicated
or conveyed determined as methods, of the more following one by City the to or
acceptable by the City Attorney and Community and Economic Development Director or
his/her designee:
(a) right-of-way dedication deed;
(b) permanent public street easement; or
(c) other conveyance instrument acceptable to the City.
3.4 Legal Description and Survey. Developer shall provide, at Developer’s sole cost, all legal
descriptions, exhibits, surveys, record drawings, and other materials reasonably required
by of the and location and area Required Dedication Area confirm the the City to
Additional Dedication Area.
3.5 Title. Developer shall convey or dedicate the Additional Dedication Area to the City free
and interests, obligations, monetary leases, all liens, of clear encumbrances, security
licenses, possessory rights, and other title exceptions except those approved in writing
by the City. Developer shall provide title evidence acceptable to the City before payment.
3.6 Taxes and Assessments. Developer shall be responsible for all taxes, assessments,
charges, and obligations attributable to the Additional Dedication Area arising before
recording of the dedication or conveyance to the City.
3.7 Acceptance by City. Dedication or conveyance of the Additional Dedication Area shall not
be deemed accepted by the City until accepted in writing by the City or accepted through
the City’s approval and recording of the final plat or other conveyance instrument, as
applicable.
Page 119 of 194
{DPK4904-5952-6841;1/13206.000004/}
4. City Payment for Additional Dedication Area
4.1 Payment Obligation. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the City shall
pay Developer for the Additional Dedication Area in the amount calculated under this
Section.
4.2 Payment Amount. The payment amount shall be:
$8.85 per square foot multiplied by the final square footage of the Additional Dedication
Area.
4.3 The Parties presently estimate that the Additional Dedication Area consists of
approximately 58,353.00 square feet.
4.4 No Payment for Required Dedication. The City shall not pay Developer for the Required
Dedication Area, any Street Improvements, or any dedication, improvement, mitigation,
or obligation required as a condition of the Plat or Development.
4.5 No Payment for Construction Costs Unless Expressly Stated. The City’s payment is solely
for the Additional Dedication Area and does not include reimbursement for construction
costs, contractor labor, materials, frontage improvements, utility costs, design costs,
charges, inspection fees, permit fees, financing costs, administrative costs, overhead,
profit, delay costs, or any other cost.
4.6 Conditions Precedent to Payment. The City shall have no obligation to pay Developer
unless and until all of the following have occurred:
(a) All Street Improvements have been completed, inspected, and bonded consistent
with all applicable city regulations;
(b) Developer dedication documents or conveyance all and executed has delivered
required by the City;
(c) the dedication or conveyance of the Additional Dedication Area has been recorded;
(d) Developer that the has provided title evidence acceptable to the City showing
Additional Dedication Area is conveyed free and clear of unacceptable title
exceptions;
(e) Developer has paid all taxes, assessments, and charges attributable to the Additional
Dedication Area through the date of conveyance or dedication; and
(f) Developer is not in default under this Agreement, the Plat approvals, or applicable
permit conditions.
4.7 Time for Payment. The City shall make payment within thirty days after satisfaction of all
conditions precedent in Section 4.6 unless the City reasonably determines that additional
documentation is required.
Page 120 of 194
{DPK4904-5952-6841;1/13206.000004/}
4.8 Full Compensation. Payment under this Agreement constitutes full and complete
compensation for the Additional Dedication Area. Upon payment, Developer waives and
releases any claim for additional compensation, damages, interest, relocation benefits,
severance damages, inverse condemnation damages, or other amounts arising from or
related to the Additional Dedication Area, except for claims based on the City’s breach of
this Agreement.
4.9 Public Purpose and Consideration. The Parties acknowledge that the City’s payment is
made for a public municipal purpose and in exchange for the conveyance or dedication
of constitute payment the intend that Parties Additional Area. Dedication the The
adequate consideration and not a gift of public funds.
5. Permits, Approvals, and Regulatory Authority
5.1 No Permit Approval by Agreement. This Agreement does not grant, approve, vest, modify,
or guarantee any land use approval, subdivision approval, engineering approval, building
permit, right-of-way permit, utility approval, concurrency determination, or other
governmental approval.
5.2 City Police Power Preserved. Nothing in this Agreement limits the City’s legislative,
regulatory, permitting, inspection, enforcement, or police-power authority.
5.3 Independent Review. The City’s obligations under this Agreement are independent from
the City’s regulatory review of the Plat and Development. Developer shall remain subject
to all applicable laws, standards, and permit conditions.
6. Environmental Disclosure
6.1 Environmental Condition. Developer shall disclose to the City any known environmental
condition affecting the Additional Dedication Area before conveyance. The City may
terminate this agreement if an environmental condition is disclosed which is not
acceptable to the City.
7. Liens, Claims, and Encumbrances
7.1 No Liens. Developer shall keep the Additional Dedication Area and Street Improvements
free from liens, claims, and encumbrances arising from Developer’s work, contractors,
subcontractors, suppliers, consultants, or financing.
7.2 Discharge of Liens. If any lien or claim is asserted against the Additional Dedication Area,
Street Improvements, or City property arising from Developer’s obligations, Developer
shall promptly discharge, bond over, or otherwise resolve the lien or claim at Developer’s
sole cost.
Page 121 of 194
{DPK4904-5952-6841;1/13206.000004/}
7.3 Withholding. The City may withhold payment under this Agreement until Developer has
resolved reasonable City’s to encumbrance or the title claim, lien, any objection,
satisfaction.
8. Indemnification
8.1 Developer Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Developer shall defend,
indemnify, and officers, officials, appointed its elected the harmless hold and City,
against damages, demands, all claims, volunteers and agents, employees, from and
losses, liabilities, penalties, fines, costs, expenses, and attorney fees arising out of or
related to Developer’s performance or failure to perform under this Agreement.
8.2 Limitations. Developer’s indemnity shall not apply to the extent a claim is caused by the
sole or results by the concurrent from caused the a If City. of negligence claim is
negligence of Developer and the City, Developer’s indemnity obligation shall apply only
to the extent of Developer’s negligence, fault, or responsibility, subject to RCW 4.24.115.
8.3 Industrial Insurance Waiver. Solely for purposes of enforcing the indemnity obligations in
this the granted be may that under any waives Developer Agreement, immunity
Washington Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW, but only to the extent necessary to
indemnify the City as required by this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge that this
waiver has been mutually negotiated.
8.4 Survival. This Section survives completion, payment, dedication, acceptance,
termination, or expiration of this Agreement.
9. Compliance With Law
9.1 General Compliance. Developer shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local
laws, codes, ordinances, regulations, permit conditions, and City standards.
9.2 Prevailing Wage and Public Works Requirements. The Parties intend that the City’s
for not Area and Dedication Additional the Agreement is this under payment for
construction labor or construction reimbursement. To the extent any prevailing wage,
retainage, bonding, contractor registration, public works, or other labor or construction
requirement applies to any work performed by Developer or its contractors, Developer
shall be solely responsible for compliance. The City makes no representation to Developer
regarding the applicability or non-applicability of such requirements.
9.3 Nondiscrimination. Developer shall comply with all applicable nondiscrimination laws in
performing this Agreement.
10. Public Records and Audit
Page 122 of 194
{DPK4904-5952-6841;1/13206.000004/}
10.1 Public Records. Developer acknowledges that this Agreement and records related
to the City’s payment and acquisition of the Additional Dedication Area may be public
records subject to disclosure under the Washington Public Records Act, chapter 42.56
RCW.
10.2 Records. Developer shall maintain records sufficient to document compliance with
this Agreement for at least six years after final payment or for any longer period required
by law.
10.3 Audit. Upon reasonable notice, Developer shall provide the City access to records
reasonably the and Agreement this with Developer’s verify to necessary compliance
conditions for payment.
11. Default and Remedies
11.1 Default. A Party is in default if it fails to perform a material obligation under this
Agreement and does not cure the failure within thirty days after written notice from the
non-defaulting Party. If the default cannot reasonably be cured within thirty days, the
defaulting Party shall not be in default if it begins cure within the thirty-day period and
diligently pursues cure to completion.
11.2 City Remedies. In addition to any other remedy available at law or equity, if
Developer defaults, the City may withhold payment, seek specific performance, seek
damages, or pursue any other lawful remedy.
11.3 Developer Remedies. If the City defaults, Developer may seek payment of amounts
due under this Agreement after satisfaction of all conditions precedent, specific
performance, or other remedies available at law or equity, subject to applicable
limitations on claims against municipal corporations.
11.4 Consequential No Damages shall be liable to the other for Neither Party .
consequential, speculative, or punitive damages arising from this Agreement.
12. Assignment and Binding Effect
12.1 Assignment. Developer may not assign this Agreement without the City’s prior
written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld if the assignee assumes all
obligations under this Agreement and has acquired the Property or the relevant portion
thereof.
12.2 Binding Effect. This Agreement binds and benefits the Parties and their respective
successors and permitted assigns.
13. Notices
Page 123 of 194
{DPK4904-5952-6841;1/13206.000004/}
All notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered personally, by
nationally recognized overnight courier, by electronic mail, or by certified mail, return
receipt requested, to the following addresses:
City:
City of ____________
Attn: ______________________
Address: ______________________
Email: ______________________
With a copy to:
City Attorney
Address: ______________________
Email: ______________________
Developer:
Attn: ______________________
Address: ______________________
Email: ______________________
Notice is effective upon personal delivery or electronic email, one business day after
deposit with an overnight courier, or three business days after mailing by certified mail.
14. Dispute Resolution; Governing Law; Venue
14.1 Meet and Confer. Before filing litigation, the Parties shall make reasonable efforts
to meet and confer through representatives with authority to resolve the dispute.
14.2 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Washington.
14.3 Venue. Venue for any action arising from this Agreement shall be in the superior
court of Franklin County, Washington.
14.4 Attorney Fees. The prevailing Party in any action to enforce this Agreement shall
be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney fees and costs, including fees and costs on
appeal, to the extent permitted by law.
15. Miscellaneous
Page 124 of 194
{DPK4904-5952-6841;1/13206.000004/}
15.1 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including all exhibits, constitutes the entire
agreement between the Parties regarding the subject matter herein and supersedes all
prior discussions, negotiations, and understandings regarding that subject matter.
15.2 Amendment a by only amended written instrument may Agreement This . be
signed by both Parties.
15.3 No Waiver. No waiver of any breach or default shall constitute a waiver of any
other breach or default. No waiver is effective unless in writing and signed by the Party
against whom waiver is asserted.
15.4 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable,
the remaining provisions shall remain in effect unless the invalid provision is material to
the Agreement’s overall purpose.
15.5 Interpretation. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to its fair meaning
and not strictly for or against either Party.
15.6 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is for the benefit of the Parties only
and does subcontractors, contractors, including party, not create in any rights third
lenders, purchasers, lot owners, adjacent owners, or members of the public.
15.7 Signatures and Electronic Counterparts in executed be may Agreement . This
counterparts and by electronic signature, each of which shall be deemed an original and
all of which together constitute one instrument.
15.8 Authority. Each person signing this Agreement represents and warrants that they
have authority to sign on behalf of the Party for whom they sign.
16. Exhibits
The following exhibits are incorporated into this Agreement:
Exhibit A – Legal Descriptions of Property
Exhibit B – Depiction and Legal Description of Additional Dedication Area and Required
Dedication Area
SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.
CITY:
CITY OF PASCO,
a Washington municipal corporation
Page 125 of 194
{DPK4904-5952-6841;1/13206.000004/}
By: _______________________________
Name: Harold Stewart
Title: City Manager
Date: ______________________________
Approved as to form:
By: _______________________________
City Attorney
DEVELOPER:
Big Sky Developers LLC
a Washington limited liability company
By: _______________________________
Name: Brad Seabaugh
Title: ______________________________
Date: ______________________________
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
County of ____________
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ______________________ is the person
who appeared before me and said person acknowledged that they signed this instrument, on
oath stated that they were authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the
______________________ of the City of ____________, a Washington municipal corporation, to
be mentioned in purposes and uses the for entity of such act voluntary and free the the
instrument.
Dated: ______________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Printed Name: ______________________
My appointment expires: _____________
STATE OF WASHINGTON
County of ____________
Page 126 of 194
{DPK4904-5952-6841;1/13206.000004/}
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ______________________ is the person
who appeared before me and said person acknowledged that they signed this instrument, on
oath stated that they were authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the
______________________ of ______________________, a ______________________, to be
the free and voluntary act of such entity for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: ______________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Printed Name: ______________________
My appointment expires: _____________
Page 127 of 194
{DPK4904-5952-6841;1/13206.000004/}
Exhibit A
Franklin County Parcel Number: 114330193
Legal Description: Glacier Park Phase 1 Tract D
Page 128 of 194
C
O
N
V
E
N
T
I
O
N
D
R
I
V
E
G
L
A
C
I
E
R
L
A
N
E
3200 SF
128
3200 SF
129
3200 SF
130
3200 SF
131
3200 SF
132
3200 SF
133
3200 SF
134
4000 SF
135
4000 SF
136
4000 SF
137
4000 SF
138
4000 SF
139
4000 SF
140
5354 SF
141
16
0
0
2
S
F
TR
A
C
T
B
16
0
0
2
S
F
TR
A
C
T
B
KAU TRAIL RD
Exhibit B
Page 129 of 194
C
O
N
V
E
N
T
I
O
N
D
R
I
V
E
3427 SF
120
3208 SF
121
3200 SF
122
3200 SF
123
3200 SF
124
4531 SF
125
3989 SF
126
3200 SF
127
3200 SF
128
16
5
8
2
S
F
TR
A
C
T
A
16
0
0
2
S
F
TR
A
C
T
B
Page 130 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council March 16, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4769 - Targeted Urban Area (TUA) Tax Exemption
Program
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution 4769
Proposed Industrial Zone Map
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4769, declaring intent to designate
portions of the city’s industrial zones as a Targeted Urban Area for the purpose
of an industrial and manufacturing tax exemption and establishing a public
hearing on 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 8, 2026.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Unknown
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Background
Targeted Urban Areas (TUA’s) are a new recruitment, retention, and expansion
tool available in Washington per Chapter 84.25 of the Revised Code of
Washington. It allows cities and counties to offer certain exemptions from
property taxes for up to ten years the value of new construction of industrial
and manufacturing facilities in qualifying designated geographic areas.
exemption tax property (TUA) Urban Targeted State's Washington Area
program, codified under Chapter 84.25 RCW became effective July 1, 2022.
The manufacturing program's stated purpose is to encourage new and
industrial development on undeveloped or underutilized lands zoned for those
uses. It does so by allowing cities and counties to exempt the value of newly
constructed manufacturing facilities from property taxation for a period of ten
Page 131 of 194
years. The exemption applies only to the improvement value of qualifying new
construction; land value and non-manufacturing-related improvements such as
administrative offices are not included.
To qualify, a company must:
1. Certify that the availability of the tax exemption is the deciding factor in
choosing to locate in Washington State; commonly referred to as the
"but-for" test.
2. Commit to creating a minimum of 25 new family-living-wage jobs
averaging at least $23 per hour with health care benefits, construct a
minimum of 10,000 square feet of new manufacturing space (not an
addition to an existing structure)
3. Meet a minimum improvement value of $800,000 as defined under U.S.
Department of Labor Division D (Manufacturing) or Division E
(Transportation) classifications.
The City of Richland was the first jurisdiction in Washington to implement the
TUA County 2023. early in Benton its adopting program exemption,
subsequently followed by adopting a matching TUA boundary, a coordination
that proved administratively essential, as the two jurisdictions learned that non-
identical boundaries create significant implementation complications.
Council directed staff to move forward with legal steps to implement TUA
during April 13, 2026 Council Workshop meeting where Stephen McFadden
from Port of Pasco, John Rosenau from Franklin County Assessor, and
Amanda Wallner from City of Richland provided their expert opinion on the
matter. Additionally, City staff contacted Franklin County to gauge its interest in
partnering with the City to establish matching TUA boundaries, which would
streamline implementation of the program. To date, no response has been
received from the County.
Impact (other than fiscal)
Adopting a Targeted Urban Area designation would position Pasco as a more
competitive destination for manufacturing investment at a time when the
region's industrial land supply represents a meaningful economic development
asset. The program directly advances the Council's goal of expanding family-
wage a to exemption the tying Pasco in opportunities employment by
mandatory job creation threshold. Because the exemption applies only to new
construction value and does not reduce any existing assessed value on the tax
rolls, no current property owner or taxing district experiences a loss of existing
revenue. property shift: tax a However, does program the produce
Washington's levy rate system means that exempting new assessed value
from the pool effectively spreads the existing levy, causing a rate increase for
other impact, property owners during the exemption period. This while
generally small at the individual level, is real and should be communicated
transparently to the public should Council elect to move forward. The overall
Page 132 of 194
tax shift impact on the broader property-owning population varies depending on
several factors, including the value of any property tax exemptions granted to
the manufacturing company, the assessed valuation of individual properties,
and changes to the City's property tax rate over the relevant period.
V. DISCUSSION:
Recommendation
Staff recommends the resolution as presented; setting a public hearing on
September 9, 2026 Council Regular meeting.
Constraints
Two implementation constraints deserve Council's attention before proceeding.
1. Franklin County Assessor's Office is currently engaged in implementing
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) within their assessment software, and
that system does not currently support the TUA program. Should the
City move forward, the County will need to engage their software vendor
to develop TUA compatible functionality, a process that may introduce
lead time between Council action and full program implementation.
2. Experience shared by the Benton County Assessor's Office underscores
that the City's TUA boundary and the County's TUA boundary must be
identical for the program to function effectively. Misaligned boundaries
create administrative complexity and risk of error that could undermine
the program's credibility with prospective applicants. As mentioned
above, City has not received a response from the County on this matter.
Next Steps
If Council provides direction to proceed, City will take the following steps in
sequence.
1. Identify contiguous parcels within City limits that are zoned for industrial
and definition statutory the of and uses manufacturing meet
undeveloped or underutilized land. - Completed
2. Initiate direct engagement with Franklin County Assessor's Office and
the TUA shared a align on Commissioners County of Board to
and boundary, discuss the County's software readiness timeline,
determine whether the County intends to adopt a parallel resolution
extending the exemption to county property taxes. - Completed
3. Once those foundational elements are in place, staff will return to
Council with a proposed Resolution of Intent to designate the Pasco
TUA and schedule the required public hearing. The public hearing notice
must be published for two consecutive weeks, no more than 30 days
before the hearing date. - In progress.
4. Additional outreach to community if Council desires.
5. Final Council action in the form of an ordinance or resolution formally
establishing the Pasco Targeted Urban Area would follow the public
Page 133 of 194
hearing.
6. Staff prepares a program plan for Council review to outline program
process from application to tax exemption.
Alternatives:
1. Take no action at this time, preserving the ability to revisit the program
at a future date.
Page 134 of 194
Resolution - Intent to Set Public Hearing for TUA - 1
Version 1.9.26
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
THE OF TO DESIGNATE INTENT DECLARING PORTIONS CITY’S
INDUSTRIAL ZONES AS A TARGETED URBAN AREA FOR THE PURPOSE
OF AND AN INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING TAX EXEMPTION
ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE.
WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature finds that it is critical for Washington State
to promote its continued strength in the fields of aerospace, technology, biomedical and other
industries that will provide family-wage job growth; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature also finds that many cities planning under
the Growth Management Act, Ch. 36.70A RCW, have designated and zoned lands for industrial
and manufacturing use; and
WHEREAS, the industrial and manufacturing industries provide family living wage jobs;
and
WHEREAS, in 2025, approximately 30% of Franklin County workers earned less than the
state-identified family living wage of $23.00 per hour; and
WHEREAS, Council finds that there are insufficient family living wage jobs for its
residents.
WHEREAS, Chapter 84.25 RCW opportunity to governments with the provides local
exempt certain properties from property taxes for the value of new construction of industrial and
manufacturing facilities in targeted areas to encourage new manufacturing and industrial uses on
undeveloped or employment to increase a as means for zoned underutilized lands said uses
opportunities for family living wage jobs (referred to as a Targeted Urban Area or TUA); and
WHEREAS, an area of approximately 8,100 acres as shown in Exhibit A attached hereto,
is zoned Light Industrial (I-1), Medium Industrial (I-2), and Heavy Industrial (I-3).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
the That to designate City intends approximately 8,100 A, on Exhibit shown acres as
attached hereto as a Targeted Urban Area (TUA), for the purpose of allowing property owners
within this a and receive to apply for who qualify under area Ch. 84.25 RCW property tax
exemption for the value of new construction of industrial and manufacturing facilities., and
That the 8,100 manufacturing acres shown on Exhibit A are zones for industrial and
purposes.
Page 135 of 194
Resolution - Intent to Set Public Hearing for TUA - 2
Version 1.9.26
That creation of Targeted Urban Area as authorized under Ch. 84.25 RCW will assist in
the new construction of industrial/manufacturing facilities that will provide employment for family
living wage jobs.
A public hearing to consider this intended action, as required pursuant to RCW 84.25.060,
will be held during the regularly scheduled Pasco City Council meeting on September 8, 2026 at
or after 7:00 p.m.
Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of
________________, 20__.
Charles Grimm
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 136 of 194
C
O
LUM
B
IA
R
I
V
E
R S
N
A
K
E
R I
V
E R
N
3
R
d
A
v
e
E Ain
s
w
o
r
t
h
A
v
e
Us
3
9
5
S
U
S
3
9
5
S
U
S
3
9
5
N
Ja
s
o
n
A
v
e
N
2
4
T
h
A
v
e
W
C
l
a rk St
S
2
8
Th
A
ve
E Hillsboro St
N
4
Th
A
v
e
W A
S
t
W Colum
b
i
a
S
t
W Pearl St
Ro
a
d
4
4
W Wernett Rd
Herita g e B l v d
E B roadway
S
t
E Lewis St
Ro
a
d
3
6
S
1
0
T
hAve
N
5
T
h
A
v
e
E Do
c
k
S
t
SOreg
o
n
A
v
e
N
O
r
e
g
on Ave
N
1
4
Th
A
ve
N
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
A
v
e
W Court St
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
Way
Pasc
o
K
a
h
l
o
t
u
s
R
d
Clark Rd
G
l
a
d
e
N
o
r
t
h
R
d
N
Capitol
Av
e
US
3
9
5
N
N
20Th
Ave
W Le
w
i
s
S
t
NCo
m
m
ercia
l
A
v
e
I-18
2
E
I-182 W
U
S
1
2
E
U
S
1
2
W
nTargeted
Urban Area
=oning
Legend
Roads
Major
Minor
TUA
City Limits
Urban Growth Areas
Parcels
EXHIBIT A
Page 137 of 194
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council March 30, 2026
TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 7/20/26
FROM: Harold Stewart, City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Agreement – Harris Road Realignment Agreement with VWA-Pasco,
LLC, ("Visconsi") for Broadmoor Development
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Proposed Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute
the Harris Road Realignment Agreement with VWA-Pasco, LLC., ("Visconsi")
in substantially the form presented, with authority to make minor administrative
or non-substantive revisions as may be necessary prior to execution.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Revenue:
Traffic Impact Fee: $870 thousand
Tax Increment Financing: $3.0 million
Expense:
Engineer's Cost Estimate: $3.8 million
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Background
The Broadmoor Area in northwest Pasco is a 1,200-acre master-planned
district identified as a critical growth corridor in the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Strategically envisioned a as is Broadmoor 182, Interstate near located
regional hub for commercial, residential, and mixed-use development, including
retail centers, restaurants, medical offices, and up to 5,000 residential units.
The multimodal emphasizes connectivity, Master Broadmoor Plan
by transportation, and sustainable urban design, supported significant
infrastructure investments. It has been critical for the City to ensure that the
Page 138 of 194
transportation infrastructure within this area is adequate for foreseeable future.
To fund infrastructure improvements, the City has utilized Tax Increment
Financing (TIF), ensuring these improvements occur without increasing taxes
on current residents. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) in Washington allows
cities, counties, and port districts to fund public infrastructure improvements by
capturing the increase in property tax revenue (the “increment”) that results
from rising property values within a designated area after development. Instead
of raising new taxes, the future growth in property taxes is allocated to pay for
public improvements or repay bonds. State property taxes and voter-approved
school levies are excluded from this calculation. Projects planned to be funded
by Tax Increment Financing (TIF) include the expansion of Broadmoor
Boulevard, extension of Sandifur Parkway, new Road 108, and major upgrades
to the Road 100/I-182 interchange.
Harris Road
The existing roadway configuration of Harris Road does not adequately support
anticipated traffic volumes or connectivity required for large-scale commercial
development and creates safety issues due to its proximity to soon to be four
way intersection on Sandifur Parkway and Broadmoor Boulevard. Due to these
factors, City has identified need to reroute Harris Road to Road 103 within the
Broadmoor area. More information on traffic circulation in Broadmoor area can
be found on Broadmoor Area Master Plan Section 2.2.3 Access and Circulation
(Page 26) https://www.pasco-
wa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/64884/Broadmoor-Master-Plan-Adopted-April-
17-2023-?bidId=.
Council approved Ord. 4834 vacating the old Harris Road ROW at the May 4,
2026 Regular requires agreement meeting. The Council City proposed
Visconsi to dedicate the right-of-way necessary for the new Harris Road
alignment to the City at no cost upon closing of the property purchase, but no
later than February 15, 2027, in accordance with the agreement.
V. DISCUSSION:
Discussion
Visconsi, is a fourth generation, family-owned developer and manager of retail
and other properties and a provider of real estate advisory services. They
operate coast to coast and are under contract to develop south east end
adjacent to Broadmoor Blvd as shown below in preliminary site plan (which is
subject to change prior to finalization of plans).
the at acreage develop land agreement purchase a has to Visconsi,
intersection of Broadmoor and Sandifur. City staff and representatives from
Page 139 of 194
Visconsi have been discussing and negotiating the need to realign Harris Road
to support the commercial development and how it effects the site design of the
property.
The City has started scoping and design efforts that is expected to be complete
in the fall of 2026, allowing for bidding in late 2026/early 2027. If approved by
Council award of construction bid is scheduled for early 2027 and construction
beginning in Spring 2027. Completion of construction is targeted for no later
than 2028.
This timeline allows for Visconsi to secure tenant agreements in 2026,
construction of buildings in 2027, and tenant occupancy as soon as late 2027.
The proposed agreement with Visconsi Companies sets a framework for cost-
sharing, if necessary, and coordinates the Harris Road realignment to ensure
timely investment, private supports This delivery. infrastructure alignment
accelerates economic development, and advances the City’s goal of realigning
Harris Road.
Key aspects of this development agreements are that:
The City will design and construct the Harris Road realignment in
accordance with State law, City codes, and the Broadmoor Master Plan.
Landscaping responsibility lies with Visconsi along the east side of the
realignment 2 adjacent to Phase 1, with future Phase owners
responsible for landscaping on the west side upon development.
The Harris Road realignment is a planned public infrastructure project
identified in the City's adopted Six-Year Transportation Improvement
Program and funded through the Broadmoor Tax Increment Financing
(TIF) program. The project is not a financial incentive or subsidy for this
development, the that improvement supports planned a but public
transportation network and long-term growth of the Broadmoor area.
Construction is funded through previously authorized TIF bond proceeds
and does waive, not agreement Fees. Impact Transportation The
reduce, or reimburse any fees otherwise required of the development.
Visconsi remains responsible for paying all applicable Transportation
Impact Fees, permit fees, utility connection fees, and other
development-related costs required by City code. As this and future
developments occur within the Broadmoor TIF district, the resulting
increase in property tax revenues will contribute toward repayment of
the public infrastructure investment.
The City will complete construction within 28 months of award of the
construction contract, provided the conditions outlined in the agreement
have been satisfied, including acquisition of the property by Visconsi
and dedication of the required right-of-way.
Visconsi will dedicate the required 80-foot-wide right-of-way to the City
at no cost upon closing of the property purchase, but no later than
Page 140 of 194
February 15, 2027.
Cost Sharing Framework (if bids come over the engineer estimate)
o Less than 10% - City covers full cost.
o 10% to 20% - City and Visconsi each pay 50% of this overage
cost.
o More than 20% to 30% - Visconsi pays 100% of this overage
cost.
o If bids exceed 30%, the City may reject all bids and terminate the
agreement. If the City later cancels the project after receiving the
right-of-way dedication, Visconsi may construct the improvements
and potential and fee credits transportation pursue impact
developer reimbursement as allowed by City code.
Realignment to Harris Road to Road 103 is a project included in City most
recent Transportation Impact Fee project list. Transportation Impact Fees only
pay directly growth. to related cost Allocated the of portion for project
Transportation Impact Fee cost for this project per the Transportation Impact
Fee visit study the on information please For $869,250. is study more
https://www.pasco-wa.gov/1512/Transportation-Impact-Fees. Engineering
estimates for the project is $3.80 million. City issued bonds in July of 2024 (link
to agenda issuance bond
https://pasco.civicweb.net/document/297669/Ordinance%20No.%204720%20-
%20Issuance%20of%202024%20Bond%20-
%20Li.pdf?handle=D6F3D969AD4B47E4856EB63CE1CCFF4A) for
$39,000,000. Broadmoor Properties and Pasco Public Facilities District have
backstopped some of the debt for projects that supported their Development.
They pay for 100% of debt service for Sandifur Pkwy Extension to Road 108
and Road 108 Extension to Harris Road. Broadmoor Properties also entered
into an agreement with the City that backstops $5.5 million in any future
projects. The agreements allow for the City to bill the partners for any deficit in
TIF revenues till the TIF revenues are sufficient to support debt service. Once
the TIF revenues exceed debt service, City is obligated to make payments
back to the partners accordingly. The agreements are attached to the staff
report.
City has received favorable bids for past and current projects, resulting in
remaining funds of nearly $13 million (including $5.5 million for future projects).
Staff is recommending usage of combination of Tax Increment Financed bond
proceeds and Transportation Impact Fee to complete this project.
Recommendation
Staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the
Harris Road Realignment Agreement with VWA-Pasco, LLC., ("Visconsi") in
substantially the form presented, with authority to make minor administrative or
non-substantive changes as may be necessary prior to execution.
Page 141 of 194
Alternatives
Council can reject the development agreement and direct staff to revise certain
elements of the agreements.
Impact
The developer needs the agreement with the City to continue recruiting
prospective businesses to the site. Delay in approval of the agreement could
result in delays to, or loss of, future commercial development opportunities
Page 142 of 194
1.
.
.
.
..
.
.
"
a
n
.
.
..
..
.
_I
"1
.
I
I.
.
I.
_
I
I.
I
I
I
n
.
.
1
.
.
.
.
L
I
..
I
.
II
.
.
Ja
m
.
.
.
“
I_
.
.
h
1
.
.
.
n
_
?
.
.
_
m
u
.
.
.
.
.
u
.
u
_
.
.
I
.
.
f
_
.
.
.
.
_
n
f
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
a
u
w
..
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
r
r
.
”
.
.
.
.
.
n
.
.
.
rI
I
I
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
..
.
1
.
.
u
.
.
1
LI
.
..
.
.
I
.
.I
I
H
I
L
I
..
.
.
..
..
.I
.|
.
I
.I
.“
I
.
I.
.
-I
W
I
I
I
h
I
-
“I
I-
"
I
II
"
II
I
II
-
II
-
.
..
.
"
.
..
.
a
I
.
_
u
n-
.
u
.
.
II
II
.
.“
r
.
.
.
..
u.
..
u
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
..
.
—
I
.
..
.
.
I
I.
.
.
”
.
.
.
.
.
l
..
I.
I
H
_I
.
—
.
.
H
..
.
.
..
I
..
I.
u.
..
....
..
I
._
..
.
n
.
..
.
_
.
.
1|
1
.—
.
..
.
.—
I.
.u
I
I
.
.
..
..
.u
I
.LI
.
.
.
—
.
I.
.I
.".
.
I
r
..
...—
L.
.
u.
.
.—
...
.
..
I
..
..
.
.
L
.
.
I1
.
q
I
.
..
.
I
I.
.
..
.
.
.I
.
..
.
I
.
.
.
I
.—
.m
x
.
.
.
.
I.
I
.
n
..
.u
.
.”
I
II
.
._
..
..
I
I
I
u.
I
II
.L
I
I
I
II
.
.
.1
.u
I
l
l
l
I
II
I
I
.I
.
.
.
u
_
.
.
.
_
l
u
.
.-
”
&
H
I.
.
.
.
.
.
L
I
-
.I
..
m
.
.n
..
..
I
.
..
.
.
.
..
u
Ew
?
?
i
?
t
l
3%
\O
O
O
\
]
O
\
U
l
-
D
U
J
N
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
2O
HA
R
R
I
S
RO
A
D
RE
A
L
I
G
N
M
E
N
T
AG
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
Th
i
s
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(“
R
e
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
”
or
“Ag
r
e
e
me
n
t
”
)
is
en
t
e
r
e
d
in
t
o
th
i
s
th
i
s
da
y
of
20
2
6
,
by
an
d
be
t
w
e
e
n
th
e
Ci
t
y
of
a
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
St
a
t
e
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Co
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
(“
C
i
t
y
”
)
,
an
d
VW
A
-
P
a
s
c
o
,
LL
C
,
an
Oh
i
o
li mi
te d
li
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
co
m
p
a
n
y
(“
V
i
s
c
o
n
s
i
”
)
.
Th
e
Ci
t
y
an
d
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
ar
e
ea
c
h
a
“P
a
r
t
y
”
an
d
co
l
l
e
c
ti
v
e
l
y
th
e
“P
a
r
t
i
e
s
”
to
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
I.
RE
C
I
T
A
L
S
A.
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
is
a
pa
r
t
y
to
a
pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
an
d
sa
l
e
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
wi
t
h
Br
o
a
d
m
o
o
r
Pr
o
p
e
rt
i
e
s
,
LL
C
(“
B
P
”
)
,
th
e
ow
n
e
r
of
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
ge
n
e
r
a
l
l
y
kn
o
w
n
as
Lo
t
10
of
Re
c
o
r
d
Su
r
v
e
y
No
.
19
5
6
3
16
an d/or
Fr
a
n
k
l
i
n
Co
u
n
t
y
Ta
x
Pa
r
c
e
l
No
.
11
5
2
1
0
0
4
0
(t
h
e
“P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
”
)
.
B.
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
st
a
t
e
s
th
a
t
th
e
ab
o
v
e
re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
d
pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
an
d
sa
l
e
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
al
l
o
w
s
to
de
l
i
n
e
a
t
e
an
d
pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
a
po
r
t
i
o
n
of
Lo
t
10
wh
i
c
h
is
re
f
e
r
r
e
d
to
in
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
as
P ha
se
1an
d
de
p
i
c
t
e
d
in
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
A.
C.
Th
e
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
de
s
i
r
e
s
to
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
ac
r
o
s
s
a
of
th
e
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
wi
t
h
i
n
Ph
a
s
e
1.
Th
e
Ci
t
y
ha
s
in
c
l
u
d
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
52
(H
a
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
nm
e
n
t
)
in
it
s
20
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
Si
x
-
Y
e
a
r
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
(“
S
T
I
P
”
)
.
F G :
11 04 77 72 2.
1
Page 143 of 194
WE
I
I'
I
l
t
?
-
i
-
_J
-
a
-
F
?
-
l
-.
_
-
.
.
-
.'
r
.
-
'
!
-
.
'
-
_J
.
-
.
.
E
-
_
.-
_
.1
.
.
-
I.
I.
.I
I.
II
I
I
I'
l
l
.
-
.
I
-.
.I
'I
:
I
I
“4
.
1
%
"
I
I:
I-
.
.I
-
.
.
|.
'
'
.-
-
r.
.I
-
In
n
-
f
.'
-
'_
I
I-
J
-
I
II
I
I.
.
.
IE
"
-
I-
.
:_
.
-
#?
q
I
.|
_
”|
'.
_
Il
l
a
'
r
g
'
é
-
Tg
i
i
-
?
t
g
:
_
-
.
.
'
I
-
l
l
I.
I
I
--
I
I
l
I
I.
l
l
I
l
_
.
II
-
T
p
n
I
'
T
.E
-
I
-
I
I
:
.
-:
.
:
'
}
r
l
"
-
:
'
I
I
'-
_
-
.
'
.
I
.
"
.
"
'1
‘
.
.
Il
a
.
Fi
'
H
J
I
I
-
I
I
E
.
.
.
I
I
H
'
_
|
'
I
:
-
;
.r
j
.
-
-
.
-
.
:
:
.
-
'
.
i
-
-
.
-
.
-
-
-
I
--
.
E-
__
.
:
5
:
EL
;
'
r
.-
:'
.
1
|
'
=
-.
I
_
..
__
r
-:
_
I.
II
.
I
-
r
.
'
..
_
_
.
_
‘
_
.
_-
.
'
--
"-
.
r
{I
J-
."
.
.
'
.
"
.
I
.
I
.
'
I
.
'_
I
_
'
-
I.
-
.
'
-.
.
I'
I
_-
.
r
.
.
-
h
.
I
+
_
-
.
-'
-
'.
-
..
-
I
.-
-I
-
I
..
-
'l
-.
.'
I
I
I
'-
'
I
-
I
II
I.
l
'I
-
'.
.
-
.-
'
'-
I
-
'.
.
-
-.
-
-
.
._
'
-
.
-
1
--
-
I.
l-
r
I
..
_
I
I
I.
'l
I
I.
-
I
-
'_
I
-
'
.
.
I
'
.
-.
-
a
I
I
I
I
I.
.-
_
-.
I
-
_
I_
.l
I.
-
I
_l
.
I
':
.
-
--
.
.
._
._
-.
.1
.
'-
I
I
I
I
.
10
ll 12 13
14 15 16 17
II
.
AG
R
EE
M
EN
T
1.
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
.
Th
e
wi
l
l
de
s
i
g
n
an
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
are
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
of
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
in
ac
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
Ci
t
y
co
d
e
s
,
pl
a
ns
,
sp ec
i?ca
ti
o
ns
,an
d
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
an
d
assh
o
w
n
in
ST
I
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
52
,
su
b
j
e
c
t
to
th
e
te
r
m
s
an
d
co nd
it
i
on
s
of
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
Th
e
pr
o
c
e
s
s
fo
r
de
s
i
g
n
an
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
i sas
fo
l
l
o
w
s:
a.
Th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
gn
m
e
nt
sh
a
l
l
be
ce
n
t
e
r
e
d
on
th
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
Sa
n
d
i
f
u
r
Pa
r
k
w
a
y
an
d
Ro
a
d
10
3
,
an
d
ha
v
e
a n
8 0-
fo ot
-w id eri
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
an
d
sh
a
l
l
be
inth
e
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
al
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
an
d
wi
t
h
th
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
g e n e r al
l yde
p
i
c
t
e
d
inth
e
Si
t
e
Pl
a
n
at
t
a
c
h
e
d
as
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
A
(t
h
e
“R
e
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
”
)
.
Th
e
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
en
t
de
s
ig
n
wi
l
l
pr
o
v
i
d
e
fo
r
tw
o
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
toan
in
t
e
r
i
o
r
ro
a
d
in
t
e
r
n
a
l
to
Ph
a
s
e
1
(a
co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
on
l
y
isin
c
l
u
d
e
d
inEx
h
i
b
i
t
A)
.
Th
e
Ci
t
y
D.
Th
e
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
is
cu
r
r
e
nt
l
y
de
s
ig
n
at
e
das“C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
”
un
d
e
r
th
e
Pa
s
c
o
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
an
d
is
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
l
y
zo
n
e
d
th
e
Pa
s
c
o
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Co
d
e
(P
M
C
)
.
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
pr
o
p
o
s
e
s
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
Ph
a
s
e
I
of
th
e
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
w it hami
x
e
d
-
us
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
co
n
s
i
s
t
i
n
g
of
re
t
a
i
l
,
gr
o
c
e
r
y
,
re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
,
an
d
me
d
i
c
a
l
of
?
c
e
(“
th
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
en
t
”
)
.
Th
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
wi
l
l
re
q
u
i
r
e
an
d
be
n
e
?
t
fr
o
m
re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
Ha
r
r
i
s
aspr
o
p
o
s
e
dby
th
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
ST
I
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
52
.
E.
Th
e
pa
r
t
i
e
s
de
s
i
r
e
toen
t
e
r
in
t
o
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
tofa
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
.
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
2
24
06
/
3
0
/
26
F G :
110
4
7
77
2
2
.]
Page 144 of 194
?L
f
'
I
F
.-
.I
'
I
.
‘?
m
__
-
,NI
L
E
;
$5
,
?
?
?
.l
I?
T
-
i
‘
-
_.
T
.
I
I
ga
r
-
H
I
E
.
It
‘
l
l
-
5
1
9
%
.
?
II
+
._
I.
I
-
I
I
I
t
'_
I
.
I
I
I
5
:
E
I
:
:
"
"
'
'-
'-
.
""
'
L
‘l
l
-
-|
I
|
I
-
k.
.
.-
.
-.
.
'
_
.
'I
ni
l
"
.
__
_
I
_
"
:'
:
I
If
_
-
LI
I
-
I
I
LI
I
—
2
.
:
2;
:
5
.
_'
:
_
:
.
I1
'
|
'
i
:
.
-
I‘
I
-
_'
.
'
I
'-
-
.
J
I
I
I.
I
-
I
.
'
_
I
I
I
I
II
"
:
?g
IE
}
.
I:
.
I
:
:
1
I
=
.l
I
:I
I
-
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
—
11
"
'i
-
I
I
I
‘
I
'
II
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
E
F
-
i
?
-
.
{I
I
II
I
II
I
.-
.
-
*
-
:
--
.
-
mm
Ls
.
,
1
.
_
_
:
L
'
~
'
+
-
.
-
L.
-
-
,5
,
..
-"
|
;
'
r-
'-
"
"
.
.
!
|
'.
'
55
.
x
"
.
-
”-
5
.
-
_J
-
'-
1'
-
;-
'
..
-
:
-
.
.
=
;
.
'_
:
j
'
:_
-.
..
i
'
-
'
-
”i
n
:
-"
-'
-
:
.
-
'
".
:-
'
-"
"
:
-
'
-:
i
"
.
'
i
.
=
-
-
‘
:3
5
-
r
i.
I.
.
_
I
I
I
I
'I
._
-
-.
I
I-
.
_
II
I
I.
I"
:
I.
I
-
I
E
“
”E
'
'I
'
:
'
.
'
I'
l
-
I
:I
'
:
'-
.
'
'I
fI
'
'
I-
_
'I
1"
“
Ia
r
n
i
'
.
‘
5"
"
-'
.-
I.
:
-
.I
-.
-
-
__
?r
m
?
g
?
?
a
}
--
+
""
-
E
‘
-
‘
_
*
L
'
i
:
-
Li
1
'
.
-
:
L
L
'
1
.
-
I
-
.
:s
L
.
-_
.
L
:
;
-
.
v
I.
I
'
l
:
.1
"
—
'
.
I
:I
F
-
u
c
'
II
I
.
.
I
'
r
I
'
I
'
.
-
I
|
I
_
I
I
I
_
I
.
.
I
.
I
"I
I
I
-
"
"
3
?
II
I
I
'I
-
I
.
-
I
I
1
-
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
|
_
I
I
'g
.
'-
'
"5
-
!
-
IE
-
I
L
ai
?
n
E'
I
.
-.
F
.
:
.
'
_
-
:I
-
I
I
I
F
I
'
L
T
I
'
m
:
:
1
I
r
ni
l
-
I
f
-
5
I
'
-
I-
I
‘-
-l
:
"I
I
I:
'
'-
"
T
:
-
'
.'
I
L.
.
-
H
II
“
:
II
'
-
I‘
l
l
-
I
I
r
I'
If
-
'.
I-
l
'
:I
I
I
P
-
I
-
I
i
r
-
.-
I
I
.r
:.
-
r
-
I.
l.
-
.i
'
--
:
I
.
-
.
-
'
_
-
_I
I
I.
--
-
.
_
I
-.
Ir
I
I
I
-
I
-
I
I.
II
I
I
:
-I
-
'
I
-
-
l
-
'I
I
f
I.
I-
'-
Il
l
.
:I
I
I‘
l
l
-
I
-
l.
-
I
I
{:
I
I
.
F-
'
I
I_
'-
'
I
F
'
-
I
-
ll
.
_
I.
I
:u
-
I
-
I
:r
.
I
'-
r
'
I
I
-
'
--
:
-
"
_-
.
"
-
.
--
-
-
_
..
._
I-
;
T
I.
I.
II
;
I
I.
-
I
-
I
__
.
.
.
I
'.
_
:.
:
-
.
1
-
:-
{L
.
_
_
I
:l
.
.-
.
I'
-
I
:I
1'
1
.
.
.
I'
.r
.
-
I
|
.
I
II
I.
I
I_
.
'
I
:l
_I
_
II
I
I
II
I
'
If
l
_
I
'
II
.
'-
'
rI
-
II
I
I
:—
I.
__
I
-I
'I
'
.-
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
II
.
.
.
-
II
I
'1
.
ll
-
I
I
'
'-
-
'u
.
I'
HI
'
I
r.
I
_I
I
1
':
-
_.
I
If
.
I
1
10
ll 12 13 14 15
wi
l
l
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
in
go
o
d
fa
i
t
h
in
p
u
t
fr
o
m
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
co
n
c
e
r
n
i
n
g
th
e
pr
e
c
i
s
e
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
tw o
i n te r n al
ro
a
d
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
to
th
e
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
;
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
,
ho
w
e
v
e
r
,
th
a
t
th
e
Ci
t
y
wi
l
l
ma
k
e
?n
a
l
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
ro
a
d
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
in
th
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
so
l
e
di
s
c
r
e
t
i
o
n
,
ba
s
e
d
on
en gi ne
er
in g
ju
d
g
m
e
n
t
,
pu
b
l
i
c
sa
f
e
t
y
an
d
ve
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
ci
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
,
am
o
n
g
ot
h
e
r
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Vi
s
c
on
s
i
ma
y
re
q
u
e
s
t
th
a
t
th
e
Ci
t
y
in
c
l
u
d
e
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
cu
r
b
cu
t
s
in
th
e
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
in
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
th
a
t
wi
t
h
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
’
s
Ph
a
s
e
1
si
t
e
pl
a
n
,
wh
i
c
h
th
e
Ci
t
y
ma
y
in
it
s
so
l
e
di
s
c
r
e
t
i
o
n
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
wh
e
t
h
e
r
in cl u d e
or
no
t
in
c
l
u
d
e
in
th
e
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
,
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
th
a
t
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
sh
a
l
l
pa
y
al
l
co
s
t
s
as
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
an
y
su
c
h
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
cu
r
b
cu
t
s
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
wi
t
h
o
u
t
li
m
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
de
s
i
g
n
co
s
t
s
;
in
c
r
e
a
se
d
la
b
or
,
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
an
d
/
o
r
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
co
s
t
s
;
di
f
f
e
r
i
n
g
si
t
e
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
;
de
l
a
y
or
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
ex
t
e
n
s
i
on
co
s
ts
;
an
d
/
o
r
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
ch
a
n
g
e
or
d
e
r
.
La
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
of
th
e
ri
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
is
no
t
in
c
l
u
d
e
d
in
t
Ha
rr
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
,
bu
t
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
wi
l
l
be
th
e
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
fo
r
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
on
th
e
ea
s
t
si d e
of
th
e
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
ab
u
t
t
i
n
g
Ph
a
s
e
1,
an
d
th
e
ow
n
e
r
of
th
e
re
m
a
i
n
d
e
r
of
th
e
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
wi
l
l
be
re sp o ns
ib le
fo
r
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
on
th
e
we
s
t
si
d
e
of
th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
at
th
e
ti
m
e
of
de
v
e
l
o
pm
e
n
t
of
th
a
t
po
r
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
b.
Th
e
Ci
t
y
wi
l
l
pu
b
l
i
s
h
a
Re
q
u
e
s
t
fo
r
Bi
d
s
(“
R
F
B
”
)
fo
r
th
e
Re
al
i
g
nm
en
t
sh
o
w
n
in
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
A;
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
,
ho
w
e
v
e
r
,
th
a
t
in
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
to
or
in
li
e
u
of
th
e
al
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
in
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
A,
at
th
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
di
s
c
r
e
t
i
o
n
th
e
Ci
t
y
ma
y
in
c
l
u
d
e
in
th
e
RF
B
a
Bi
d
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
No
.
1
sh o w n
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
N
TAG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
3
24
06
/
3
0
/
26
Page 145 of 194
._
-
._
_
_
-
.
r
_
..
_
5
'
|
1
_
.
-
.
.
-
:
'
-.
-
'
r
'
I
'
,
'
.
-
.
.
_:
.
.
.
_
:
.
.
_
-
"I
'
.I
I
.
.I
'-
I'
l
l
-
l
"
.
-'
--
:5
1"
"
'I
r
?
'_
_
-
9
&
3
:
EF
T
-
u
n
?
—
.“
g
?
_-
.
_
_
:
_
I
'
--
.
-
.
_
'
.
I'
.
:
:
1
-
rl
1
:
.
.
-
.
-_
.
._
._
..
-
'
.
I
'-
.
:
.
J
-
.
'
:
.
'
_-
.
fi
r
9-
4
.
5
:
-~
"
—
.-
-
‘
.
‘-
II
“'
_
_
I
-
-
-
_I
1-
'1
.
_
I.
.
.
'I
.
-
-
"
-
'
.-
:
.-
_I
I
_
II
-
I.
.I
I
I.
.
-
'?
'
-.
_.
-
-
-
--
-
.
.-
-
r
.
_
..
.
._
-
._
-
'.
'
I
.-
'_
'
'
.-
.
I
.
I
.
.
.
Ii
If
I
I
I-
-
-
-
-'
_-
.-
-I
-
-.
'
.
-
J
.
-
I
_
-.
-
:
I.
I
-.
.-
._
-
-
.-
I
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
in
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
B,
al
l
o
w
i
n
g
fo
r
a
sm
a
l
l
e
r
se
g
m
e
n
t
of
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
to
be
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
,
so
lo
n
g
th eBi
d
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
ro
a
d
w
a
y
al
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
an
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
is
su
c
h
th
a
t
th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
nm
e
n
t
ca
n
be
ex
t
e
n
d
e
d
an
d
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
wh
e
n
Ph
a
s
e
2
of
th
e
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
is
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
.
Th
e
Ci
t
y
wi
l
l
p u b li s h
th
e
RF
B
af
t
e
r
it
s
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
of
10
0
%
de
s
i
g
n
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
fo
r
th
e
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
,
bu
t
be
f
o
r
e
31
,
20
2
6
.
c.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
th
a
t
:
(i
)
th
e
Ci
t
y
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
’
s
co
s
t
es
t
i
m
a
t
e
an
d
th
e
bi ds
fo rth
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
ar
e
ac
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
to
th
e
Pa
s
c
o
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
in
it
s
so
l
e
di
s
c
r
et
i
o
n
;
(i
i
)
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
ha
s
cl
o
s
e
d
an
d
re
c
o
r
d
e
d
it
s
pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
fr
o
m
BP
of
th
e
Ph
a
s
e
1
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
;
(i
i
i
)
th
e
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
an
d
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e
bi
d
is
wi
t
h
i
n
30
%
of
th
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
’
s
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
of
Pr
o
j
ec
t
co
s
t
s;
(i
v
)
a
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
fo
r
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
is
aw
a
r
d
e
d
by
th
e
Pa
s
c
o
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
an
d
ex
e
c
u
t
e
d
be
tw ee n
th
e
Ci
t
y
an
d
th
e
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
,
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e
bi
d
d
e
r
,
an
d
(v
)
th
e
ri
g
h
t
of
wa
y
de
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
de
s
cr
i
be d
in
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
(D
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
La
n
d
)
be
l
o
w
is
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
an
d
ac
c
e
p
t
e
d
by
th
e
Pa
s
c
o
Ci
t
y
Co
u
nc
i
l
init
s
so
l
e
di
s
c
r
e
t
i
o
n
;
th
e
Ci
t
y
wi
l
l
in
i
t
i
a
t
e
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
,
wi
l
l
c o o r d i n a t e
Ci
t
y
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
ac
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
wi
t
h
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
re
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
th
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
an
d
ac
h
i
e
v
e
a
s u b s t a n ti a l
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
da
t
e
wi
t
h
i
n
28
mo
n
t
h
s
of
th
e
da
t
e
of
aw
a
r
d
of
th
e
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
.
Fo
r
of
th
i
s
su
b
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
“s
u
b
s
t
a
n
t
i
a
l
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
da
t
e
”
sh
a
l
l
ha
v
e
th
e
me
a
n
i
n
g
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
in
th
e
of
th
e
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
St
a
t
e
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
of
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
(W
S
D
O
T
)
St
a
n
d
a
r
d
Sp
e
c
i
?
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ro
ad
,
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
N
TAG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
4
24
06
/
3
0
/
26
F G :
11 04 77 72 2.1
Page 146 of 194
.
'_
.-
.
.
'
-
.
:.
I
;‘
1
;
.
-
.
'
:
'
-
.
-
.
I
'
-
'
3
5
'
-
I
-
I
::
I
.
.
:
l
.
-
=
.
:
'
-
:
-
.'
_
'
.
.
-
..
_
-
-:
.
-
.
-.
_
.,
'
.
-
'
.
.
1
"
.-
.
-
_
.
"
.
'
:
'
"
'
£
I
'
:
|
'
2
1
:
-
'
1
:
:
'
.
‘
:
.
=
2
5
'
:
.:
'.
'
I
L
I
'
:
-
'
:
-
'
_
-
3:
5
1
?
-
rl
'
:
'
.
'
:
i
-
r
I
I
:
I
'
I
'
I.
-
'
.
_
.-
'
'l
r
i
—
l
-'
'.
_
=
.
.
-
-.
ak
a
:
-I-I.
I.
.-.--.
..
l.
.
_
.-I
-.
'
-
I
.
-.
'-
l
'.
'
.
I-
.
-
I
I--.-I
'
'-
.
I
'
'I
'
:_
'-
.
'.
J
a
HI
-
"
I
-
I
.
_
:'
I
I
.'
=
-1
_
-
I
:
-
I.
-
-
.-
-
'I
.
'-
L
"
"
_.
I
'
'.
'
.
-
.l
_
:I
..
.-
‘I
I
-
?
l
f
-
1
"
_
..
:
I
I
.3
1
.
“
.
'
-'
-
'I
'
:_
_a
-
_
.
'I
-
_
T
I
I
.I
.
r
'I
-
.'
-
.
-
._
.
'
.
.
-.
-
-.
.
-
'
-
1
-
'
'-
r
_-
‘
-
_
-
II
-
r-
.
.-
I
.
-
.
.-
I
-
.j
-
.
.
-.
-
..
'-
.
'
:
-
"
"
'
l"
-
-.
I
.
-
-
-
.J
.
.
_-
|
-
.
-
.'
I
.
r
.
aw
,
-
_
'_
_
'
-
.
I
.
.
10 11 12 13 14 15
Br
i
d
g
e
an
d
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
as
mo
d
i
?
e
d
by
an
y
Ci
t
y
lo
c
a
l
ag
e
n
c
y
am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
s
,
to
th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
.
In
th
e
ev
e
n
t
th
a
t
on
e
or
mo
re
of
th
e
fo
r
e
g
o
i
n
g
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
ar
e
no
t
me
t
,
th
e
Ci
t
y
ma
y
te
r
m
i
n
a
t
e
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
as
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
S e ct
io n
3
be
l
o
w
.
(1
.
In
th
e
ev
e
n
t
th
a
t
th
e
co
s
t
of
a
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
aw
a
r
d
e
d
fo
r
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
t
Ha
rr
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
ex
c
e
e
d
s
th
e
am
o
u
n
t
of
th
e
Ci
t
y
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
’
s
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
,
th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
to
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
th
e
ex
c
e
s
s
co
s
t
s
as
fo
l
l
o
w
s
:
(1
)
if
th
e
am
o
u
n
t
of
th
e
aw
a
r
d
e
d
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
is
le
s
s
th
a
n
1 0 %of
th
e
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
’
s
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
,
th
e
Ci
t
y
wi
l
l
be
a
r
th
e
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
am
o
u
n
t
;
(2
)
if
th
e
am
o
u
n
t
of
th e
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
is
10
%
to
20
%
ov
e
r
th
e
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
’
s
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
,
th
e
Ci
t
y
an
d
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
wi
l
l
ea
c
h
pa y
5 0 %of
th
e
am
o
u
n
t
fr
o
m
10
%
-
20
%
;
an
d
(3
)
if
th
e
am
o
u
n
t
of
th
e
aw
a
r
d
e
d
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
is
mo
r
e
th
a
n
an
d
up
to
30
%
ov
e
r
th
e
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
’
s
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
,
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
is
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
fo
r
th
e
am
o
u
n
t
of
th
e
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
co
s
t
ex
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
20
%
an
d
up
to
30
%
ov
e
r
th
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
.
If
bi
d
s
ex
c
e
e
d
30
%
of
th
e
th
e
Ci
t
y
ma
y
re
j
e
c
t
al
l
bi
d
s
an
d
te
r
m
i
n
a
t
e
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
as
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
in
Se
c
t
i
o
n
3
be
l
o
w.
To
il
l
u
s
t
r
a
t
e
,
a
$4
mi
l
l
i
o
n
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
’
s
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
wo
u
l
d
re
s
u
l
t
in
th
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
co
s
t
a l l o c a t i o n :
(1
)
Ci
t
y
is
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
fo
r
up
to
$4
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
if
th
e
am
o
u
n
t
of
th
e
aw
a
r
d
e
d
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
is
u p
to10
%
ov
e
r
th
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
;
(2
)
th
e
Ci
t
y
is
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
fo
r
$4
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
an
d
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
is
re
s
p
o
ns
i
b
l
e
fo
r
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
if
th
e
am
o
u
n
t
of
th
e
aw
a
r
d
e
d
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
is
20
%
ov
e
r
th
e
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
’
s
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
;
a n d
(3 )th
e
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
N
TAG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
5
24
06
/
3
0
/
26
Page 147 of 194
...
.
.
.
.I
.
r.
.—
.
..
.
.
I.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
.
.
.
..
T"
.
-.
.
.
I
I
-
.
..
I
-
I
I
.
I
.
.
I
.
-
.
.
..
l
.
.
..
..
.
—
qu
.
l
.
.I
.
-
"
H
1
u.
-
..
”
.
.
..
I
.
.
.
..
..
.
.
I
1
.
I.
.
.
.
.1
.
.
.
..
I
.
_
.
_
I
..
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
..
1.
.
Fa
d
-
“
.
J
e
?
r
s
?
.
.u.
.
.
.
.
.
IF
I
II
I
II
II
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
u
I
"I
I
I
I
I
..
.
..
.
.
.I
.
..
.r
.
.
..
.
.
_.
_
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-.
-
..
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
:
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
I.
.
-
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
..
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
..
.I
.
.
.
.
"
I
.
.
.
I.
.
.
In
n
w
.I
.
I
.
..
n
.
I
.
.
.
.I
..
I
In
.
.
.I
.
.
-
.
.
I
.
..
.I
.
.
-
..
.
u
.
I
wI
I
-
I
I1
I-
-I
1-
'-
I.
.
.
I
1
.
.
.
.
.E
..
.
.
.u
..
.
.
r
.
.
.
.
.
.
vb
.
.
.
”
..
.
I
I
.
.
..
..
.
..
.
.
.
.
r
—
I
.
I
.
......
..
.
d1
.
..
I.
.
..
..
.
.
.
.
J
w
-
..
.
$1
.
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
._
.
..
.
-
.
.
.
.
lu
l
l
.
L
....
.
.
.
L
u
...
I
.
.
..
I
.
Hm
.
..
.
.
I
-
I
.
I1
.I
?_
.
.
.
.
.
I
.
_
.
"u
m
.
I
.m
—
u.
..
.
.
..
.
I
...
..
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
i.
.
.
.
1.
.
.
.
.
.
”
10
ll 12 13 14
Ci
t
y
is
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
fo
r
$4
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
an
d
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
is
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
fo
r
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
if
th
e
am
o
u
nt
of
th
e
aw
a
r
d
e
d
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
is
30
%
ov
e
r
th
e
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
’
s
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
.
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
wi
l
l
re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
th
e
Ci
t
y
an
y
am
o
u
n
t
s
du
e
un
d
e
r
th
i
s
su
b
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
i
n
t
(3
0
)
da
y
s
of
th
e
da
t
e
of
th
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
an
d
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
bi
d
d
e
r
’
s
ex
e
c
u
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
co nt
r
ac
t
fo
r
th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
.
Th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
ag
r
e
e
th
a
t
pa
y
m
e
n
t
of
an
y
co
s
t
s
by
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
th
i
s
su
b
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
sh
a
l
l
no
t
en
t
i
t
l
e
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
to
a
cr
e
d
i
t
ag
a
i
n
s
t
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
im
p
a
c
t
fe
e
s
pa
i
d
fo rth
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
un
d
e
r
PM
C
3.
4
0
.
0
8
0
.
If
th
e
Ci
t
y
ha
s
no
t
ex
p
e
n
d
e
d
an
y
am
o
u
n
t
s
re
i m b ur
se d
he
r
e
u
n
d
e
r
on
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
wi
t
h
i
n
?v
e
(5
)
ye
a
r
s
of
co
l
l
e
ct
i
o
n
,
th
e
Ci
t
y
sh
a
l
l
re
f
u
n
d
su
c
h
am
o
u
n
t
s
wi
t
h
i
n
th
i
r
t
y
(6
0
)
da
y
s
of
th
e
da
t
e
of
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
’
s
wr
i
t
t
e
n
th
e
r
e
f
o
r
.
e.
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
of
Ci
t
y
la
n
d
us
e
or
ot
h
e
r
pe
r
m
i
t
ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
s
fo
r
th
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
me
n
t
ma
y
re
q
u
i
r
e
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
or
pa
y
m
e
n
t
of
pr
o
ra
t
a
co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
to
w
a
r
d
s
ot
h
e
r
st
r
e
e
t
,
ro
a
d
,
or
ot
h
e
r
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
ne
e
d
e
d
to
se
r
v
e
an
d
/
o
r
mi
t
i
g
a
t
e
im
p
a
c
t
s
fr
o
m
th
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
T h e
Ci
ty
’
s
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
sh
a
l
l
no
t
be
co
n
s
t
r
u
e
d
as
li
m
i
t
i
n
g
th
e
im
p
os
i
t
i
on
of
ot
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
—
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
st
a
t
e
or
ci
t
y
la
w
s
,
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
,
or
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
au
t
h
o
r
i
z
i
n
g
or
re
q
u
i
ri
n
g
su
c
h
ot
h
e
r
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
me
a
s
u
r
e
s
or
pa
y
m
e
n
t
of
fe
e
s
as
a
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
of
Ci
t
y
us
e
ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
s
or
pe
r
m
i
t
s
ne
e
d
e
d
fo
r
th
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
6
24
06
/
3
0
/
26
Page 148 of 194
-w
z
g
a
r
-
I.
II
I.
'-
:-
—'
:
:
|
_
-
l
l
l
.
-
I
r
-
I
_
_
I
!
_
!
I
..
.l
_
-.
_
.
-
_-
.
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
2.
De
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
La
n
d
.
On
or
be
f
o
r
e
th
e
da
t
e
of
cl
o
s
i
n
g
of
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
’
s
ac
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y,
an dno
la
t
e
r
th
a
n
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
15
,
20
2
7
,
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
wi
l
l
de
d
i
c
a
t
e
or
ca
u
s
e
to
be
de
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
th
e
Ci
t
y
,
no
co
s
t
to
th
e
Ci
t
y
su
f
?
c
i
e
n
t
ri
g
h
t
-
o
f
—
w
a
y
fo
r
th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
as
de
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
in
S ec
ti o n
1.
a
.
ab
o
v
e
an
d
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
s
A
an
d
B.
De
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
sh
a
l
l
be
ac
c
o
m
p
l
i
s
h
e
d
by
a
Ba
r
g
a
i
n
an
d
Sa
l
e
D e e d
inth
e
fo
r
m
at
t
a
c
h
e
d
he
r
e
t
o
as
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
an
d
su
b
j
e
c
t
on
l
y
to
an
y
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
ex
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
th
e
s t
pr
i
n
t
e
d
ex
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
ti
t
l
e
id
e
n
t
i
?
e
d
in
th
e
pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
co
m
m
i
t
m
e
n
t
fo
r
ti
t
l
e
in
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
d at e d
[da
t
e
he
r
e
]
.
At
co
n
v
e
y
a
n
c
e
,
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
wi
l
l
pr
o
v
i
d
e
Ci
t
y
wi
t
h
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
AL
T
A
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
ti
t
l
e
in
s
u
r
i
n
g
Ci
t
y
ag
a
i
n
s
t
lo
s
s
or
da
m
a
g
e
ar
i
s
i
n
g
fr
o
m
an
y
de
f
e
c
t
s
in
ti
t
l
e
su
b
j
e
c
t
to
an y
e x i s ti n g
ex
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
th
e
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
pr
i
n
t
e
d
ex
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
id
e
n
t
i
?
e
d
in
th
e
pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
co
m
m
i
t
m
e
nt
f o rti
t
l
e
in
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
da
t
e
d
[d
a
t
e
he
r
e
]
.
At
th
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
re
q
u
e
s
t
,
th
e
ti
t
l
e
po
l
i
c
y
ma
y
in
c
l
u
d
e
ex
t
e
n
d
e
d
or
en
d
o
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
(s
u
b
j
e
c
t
to
th
e
ti
t
l
e
co
m
p
a
n
y
’
s
ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
of
ex
t
e
n
d
e
d
co
v
e
r
a
g
e
or
en
d
o
rs
e
m
en
t
)
,
bu
t
th
e
Ci
t
y
wi
l
l
be
a
r
th
e
ex
p
e
n
s
e
fo
r
an
y
ex
t
e
n
d
e
d
co
v
e
r
a
g
e
or
en
d
o
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
D e m ol
i
ti
o
n,
re
m
o
v
a
l
or
ab
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
of
an
y
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
or
ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
cu
r
r
e
nt
Ha
rr
i
s
Ro
a
d
al
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
as
of
th
e
da
t
e
of
an
y
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
va
c
a
t
i
n
g
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
sh
a
l
l
be
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
3.
Co
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
an
d
Te
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
.
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
7
24
06
/
3
0
/
26
F G :
11 04 77 72 2.1
Page 149 of 194
10
11 12 13 14 15 16
a.
If
th
e
Ci
t
y
ha
s
no
t
re
c
e
i
v
e
d
a
de
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
a
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
ri
g
h
t
-
of
—
wa
y
by
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
15
,
20
2
7
,
th
e
Ci
t
y
ma
y
up
d
a
t
e
it
s
Ci
t
y
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
’
s
co
s
t
es
t
i
m
a
t
e
an
d
th
e
bi
d
s
fo
r
Ha
rr
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
an
d
re
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
th
e
pr
o
c
e
s
s
ou
t
l
i
n
e
d
in
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2.
b
—
2.
d
du
r
i
n
g
th
e
s u b s e q u e n t
bi
d
cy
c
l
e
.
b.
In
th
e
ev
e
n
t
th
a
t
:
(a
)
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
fa
i
l
s
to
ta
k
e
al
l
of
th
e
ac
t
i
o
n
s
de
sc
r
ib ed
in
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1(
b
)
by
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
15
,
20
2
7
;
(b
)
on
e
or
mo
r
e
of
th
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
in
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1(
c
)
a r e
n otme
t
or
(0
)
bi
d
s
fo
r
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
ex
c
e
e
d
30
%
of
th
e
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
’
s
an
d
th
e
Ci
t
y
re
j
e
c
t
s
al
l
bi
d
s
;
th
e
Ci
t
y
ma
y
un
i
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
l
y
te
r
m
i
n
a
t
e
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
Te
r
m
i
n
a
ti
o
n
sh
a
l
l
be
ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
up
o
n
el
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c
,
ma
i
l
or
in
-
p
e
r
s
o
n
de
l
i
v
e
r
y
of
wr
i
t
t
e
n
no
t
i
c
e
of
sa
m
e
to
Vi
s
c
on
s
i
.
c.
If
th
e
Ci
t
y
ha
s
re
c
e
i
v
e
d
a
de
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
a
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
ri
g
h
t
-
o
f
—w
a
y
an
d
su
b
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
l
y
ca
n
c
e
l
s
th
e
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
pr
o
j
e
c
t
an
d
te
r
m
i
n
a
t
e
s
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
Vi
s
c
on
s
i
ma
y
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
at
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
’
s
co
s
t
th
e
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
de
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
en
t
ri
g
ht
-
of
-
w
a
y
,
an
d
re
c
e
i
v
e
a
cr
e
d
i
t
fo
r
th
e
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
co
s
t
s
ag
a
i
n
s
t
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
im
p
a
c
t
fe
e
s
p a i dby
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
fo
r
it
s
Ph
a
s
e
1
pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
ma
y
al
s
o
se
e
k
ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
fo
r
a
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
re
i
m
b
ur
s
e
me
n
t
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
pu
r
s
u
a
n
t
to
Ch
.
14
.
2
5
of
th
e
Pa
s
c
o
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Co
d
e
,
up
to
th
e
am
o
u
n
t
of
Re
al
i
gn me
nt
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
pa
i
d
by
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
in
ex
c
e
s
s
of
th
e
am
o
u
n
t
of
an
y
cr
e
d
i
t
ag
a
i
n
s
t
Ph
a
s
e
1
tr
a
n
sp
o
r
ta
t
i
o
n
im
p
a
c
t
fe
e
s
.
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
8
24
06
/
3
0
/
26
F G :
11 04 77 72 21
Page 150 of 194
10 11 12 13
14 15 16
4.
De
?
n
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
Wo
r
d
s
an
d
ph
r
a
s
e
s
hi
g
h
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
in
bo
l
d
he
r
e
i
n
sh
a
l
l
ha ve
th eme
a
n
i
ng
as
c
r
i
b
e
d
to
th
e
m
by
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
Al
l
ot
h
e
r
wo
r
d
s
an
d
ph
r
a
s
e
s
sh
a
l
l
be
in
t
e
r
p
re
t
e
d
us
i
n
g
th
e
or
d
i
n
a
r
y
me
a
n
i
n
g
de
r
i
v
e
d
fr
o
m
di
c
t
i
o
n
a
r
i
e
s
in
co
m
m
o
n
us
a
g
e
su
c
h
as
Ox
f
or
d
'
s
Am
e
ri
c
a
n
Di
c
t
i
o
n
a
r
y
,
Me
r
r
i
a
m
-
W
e
b
s
t
e
r
'
s
Di
c
t
i
o
n
a
r
y
,
or
th
e
Am
e
r
i
c
a
n
He
r
i
t
a
g
e
Co
l
l
e
g
i
a
t
e
5.
Re
c
i
t
a
l
s
an
d
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
s
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
by
Re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
.
Al
l
Re
c
i
t
a
l
s
a n dEx
h
i
b
i
ts
re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
d
in
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
ar
e
he
r
e
b
y
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
by
th
i
s
re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
an
d
sh
a
l
l
b e
c o n s i d e r e das
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
te
r
m
s
of
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
6.
In
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
Th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
an
d
it
s
co
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
el
e
m
e
n
t
s
co
n
s
t
it
u
t
e
th
e
en
t
i
r
e
un
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
be
t
w
e
e
n
th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
re
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
th
e
su
b
j
e
c
t
ma
t
t
e
r
he
r
e
o
f
,
an
d
no
pr
i
o
r
orwr
i
t
t
e
n
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
sh
a
l
l
be
va
l
i
d
.
7.
He
a
d
i
n
g
s
.
Th
e
he
a
d
i
n
g
s
us
e
d
in
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
ar
e
fo
r
co
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
an
d
sh
a
l
l
no
t
be
us
e
d
to
in
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
th
e
te
r
m
s
of
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
8.
Ob
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
to
Ab
i
d
e
by
La
w
.
Th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
th
e
i
r
re
s
p
e
c
ti
v
e
ob
l
i
ga
t
i
on
s
to
ab
i
d
e
by
ci
t
y
,
st
a
t
e
,
an
d
fe
d
e
r
a
l
la
w
s
an
d
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
ap
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
to
th
i
s
Ag
r
ee
m
en
t
an
d
th
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
No
t
h
i
n
g
he
r
e
i
n
sh
a
l
l
pr
e
v
e
n
t
th
e
Ci
t
y
fr
o
m
en
f
o
r
c
i
n
g
su
c
h
la
w
s
w he
re
ap
p
li
c
a
bl
e
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
wi
t
h
o
u
t
li
m
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
su
c
h
la
w
s
,
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
or
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
ap
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
to
th e
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
9
24
06
/
3
0
/
26
Page 151 of 194
-;
-
'
.
n
~
.
;
.
-
W"
"_
:
-
.
.
'
.
-
'1
4
:
?
1:
:
53
¢
“
.
.;
--
I-
I
-
._
.u
.-
-
-
35
'
!
.a
.
-
.
_
.
-
1
.
'
{
'
?
-
L
-
'
:
"
"
'
-
"
'
-
"
'
l
.
:
.
-
u-
'
:
F
=
"
'
1
.
_
_
.
"
'
i
'
-
H
1
-
-
.-
:
-
:
_
'
-
.-
_
-
'
.
-
.
“f
I.G‘
s
-
H
E
W
”
;
we
:
1:
:
.'
f
+
c
*
1
_
-
'
~
.
.
'
.
-
-
-
:
14
.
:
.
”p
a
w
.
$9
¢
1
E
H
:-
3
3-
5
;
}
.
32
1
:
;
lu
m
p
;
'
.-
.
-
-
.
-
'
_
ii
i
-
H
y
“-
I
H
W
I
I
I
E
P
I
-
I
F
I
é
I
h
I
-
I
-
I
I
:
.I
‘
-
l
.
.
.
-
'_
:
'-
_
.
-
.
.J
.I
'
14
'
]
I'
I
.J
.-
-
_-
'
-
.
-i
_'
-
.
'
-
'
:
_
.
'
-
.
'
_
:
u
'
"i
n
E-.
"
'
-
_
r
.'
-
'
_-
'
'-
—l
-
'
'I
-
'1
.
_r
I.
'
_
'
-
_
-
I
'
-
.
=-
.-
.
'
-
:
'
-
I
I
.
-
-
.'
:'
I
._
'.
.
-
.
r
..
'_
.
'
.
_
-
.
_
:
.
'
.
-'
.
-
_
"
-
--
"
.-
-_
_
'I
'
I
'
--
-
_
-
_
__
:
I
II
.
-
-I
-
'.
-
.
'
.‘
I
I.
-
.-
""
.
-
__
_'
I
.I
'
P-
I
"
_
.,
-
'
._
'-
-
'.
2
-
l
I"
'
'.
—
'
.
'
-
'
1
'
-
'
-
"
-
.
:
-
:
l
l
'
_
:
|
'
-
e
.
-
--
-
-
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
an
y
re
l
a
t
e
d
to
st
r
e
e
t
,
ro
a
d
,
ut
i
l
i
t
y
or
ot
h
e
r
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
to
th
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
or
mi
t
i
g
a
t
e
it
s
im
p
a
c
t
s
,
an
d
/
o
r
re
l
a
t
e
d
to
Ci
t
y
?J
n
d
i
n
g
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
9.
In
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
Th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
ha
s
be
e
n
re
v
i
e
w
e
d
an
d
re
v
i
s
e
d
by
le
g
al
c o u n s el
fo
r
al
l
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
,
an
d
no
pr
e
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
or
ru
l
e
co
n
s
t
r
u
i
n
g
am
b
i
g
u
i
t
y
ag
a
i
n
s
t
th
e
dr
a
f
t
e
r
of
th
e
sh
a
l
l
ap
p
l
y
to
th
e
in
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
or
en
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
of
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
No
t
h
i
n
g
he
r
e
i
n
s h a l lbe
co
n
s
t
r
u
e
d
as
a
wa
i
v
e
r
of
th
e
Ci
t
y
'
s
co
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
an
d
st
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
po
w
e
r
s
.
No
t
h
i
n
g
he
r
e
i
n
s h a llbe
co
n
s
t
r
u
e
d
or
im
p
l
i
e
d
th
a
t
th
e
Ci
t
y
ha
s
by
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
e
d
aw
a
y
it
s
co
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
io
n
a
l
an
d
st
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
po
w
e
r
s
,
ex
c
e
p
t
as
ot
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
au
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
by
la
w
,
no
r
th
a
t
th
e
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
in
wa
y
re
q
u
i
r
e
s
th
e
Ci
t
y
to
ac
t
co
n
t
r
a
r
y
to
or
ot
h
e
r
th
a
n
in
co
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
al
l
ap
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
fe
d
er
a
l
st
a
t
e
,
co
u
n
t
y
an
d
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
st
a
t
u
t
e
s
,
la
w
s
,
ru
l
e
s
,
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
.
10
.
Au
t
h
o
r
i
?
.
Ea
c
h
si
g
n
a
t
o
r
y
to
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
re
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
an
d
wa
r
r
a
n
t
s
th
a
t
or
sh
e
ha
s
fu
l
l
po
w
e
r
an
d
au
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
to
ex
e
c
u
t
e
an
d
de
l
i
v
e
r
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
on
be
h
a
l
f
of
th
e
Pa
r
t
y
wh
ic
h
he
or
sh
e
is
si
g
n
i
n
g
,
an
d
th
a
t
he
or
sh
e
wi
l
l
de
f
e
n
d
an
d
ho
l
d
ha
r
m
l
e
s
s
th
e
ot
h
e
r
P ar
ti es
an
d
si
g
n
a
t
o
r
i
e
s
fr
o
m
an
y
cl
a
i
m
th
a
t
he
or
sh
e
wa
s
no
t
fu
l
l
y
au
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
to
ex
e
c
u
t
e
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
em
e
nt
on
be
h
a
l
f
of
th
e
pe
r
s
o
n
or
en
t
i
t
y
fo
r
wh
o
m
he
or
sh
e
si
g
n
e
d
.
Up
o
n
pr
o
p
e
r
ex
e
c
u
t
i
o
n
an
d
de
l
i
ve
r
y,
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
wi
l
l
ha
v
e
be
e
n
du
l
y
en
t
e
r
e
d
in
t
o
by
th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
,
an
d
wi
l
l
be
en
f
o
r
c
e
a
b
l
e
ag ai
n
st
ea
c
h
Pa
r
t
y
in
ac
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
th
e
te
r
m
s
he
r
e
i
n
.
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
1 0
o f24
06
/
3
0
/
26
Page 152 of 194
."
Ir
d
r
u
w
g
-
‘
n
'
f
’
r
'
a
:
__
.
_
-
|
.
.
-
-
I
'
-
I:
'
-
__
:
'
-
.
'
:
-
"
"
'
I
'
I
"
-
"
-
-
:
"
:I
’
?
'
“H
’
1r
"
J?
i
‘
?
FE
E
-
H
}
.
I?
i
E
-
n
'
f
?'
i
i
H?
?
’
?
-
'-
‘
|
:
I
|
'
-
'
-
|
-
"
'
.
.
1'
J
L
.
.
-
_
'
_
_
1
'
;
_
_
?
.
“
7
:
.
;
‘
_
.
'
.
-
:
?i
?
$4
5
.
1
3
;
?
!
nF
I
E
'
J
H
h
-
"‘
_
-
.-
.
-_
-
:
.
_
"
"
:
'
:
.
!
'
.
j
'
-
'
"
-
'
-
'
_
-
.
.
"5
-
3
;
"
-
'.
'
.
'
.
-
.
‘
-
.'
I
:
_
I-
i
'
-
‘
I
1
-
_
-
'
-
.
.
:
'
-
,
'
:
;
.
_
-
'
:
I.
I
I
II
I
-
:
"
I
.
"
'
+
'
:
a
I
..
?r
?
-I
_
-
.
-
.
-
_
_
_
._
.
I
_1
-
'.
.
'-
.
.
I
-
In
n
-
5
.
1
.
.
--
.
-
-.
.
'
.
-
-
.-
-.
'
-
.
11
.
M.
If
an
y
Pa
r
t
y
is
d e l a y e d
inth
e
pe
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
of
it
s
ob
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
inth
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
du
e
to
Fo
r
c
e
Ma
j
e
u
r
e
,
th
e
n
p er
fo r m a n ce
of
su
c
h
ob
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
sh
a
l
l
be
ex
c
u
s
e
d
fo
r
th
e
pe
r
i
o
d
of
de
l
a
y
.
Fo
r
c
e
Ma
j
cu
r
e
me
a
n
s
ex
t
r
ao
r
di
n
a
ry
na
t
u
r
a
l
ev
e
n
t
s
orco
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
su
c
h
aswa
r
,
ri
o
t
,
la
b
o
r
di
s
p
u
t
e
s
,
or
ot
h
e
r
ca
u
s
e
s
be
y
o
n
d
th
e
co
n
t
r
o
l
of
th
e
ob
l
i
g
a
t
e
d
pa
r
t
y
.
12
.
No
t
i
c
e
s
.
Al
l
no
t
i
c
e
s
,
re
q
u
e
st
s
,
de ma
nd
s
,an
d
ot
h
e
r
co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
ca
l
l
e
d
fo
r
or
co
n
t
e
m
p
l
a
t
e
d
by
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
sh
a
l
l
be
i
an
d
sh
a
l
l
bedu
l
y
gi
v
e
n
byma
i
l
i
n
g
th
e
sa
m
e
by
ce
r
t
i
?
e
d
ma
i
l
,
re
t
u
r
n
re
c
e
i
p
t
re
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
,
o rbyde
l
i
v
e
r
i
ng
th
e
sa
m
e
byha
n
d
,
toth
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
ad
d
r
e
s
s
e
s
,
or
to
su
c
h
ot
h
e
r
ad
d
r
e
s
s
e
s
as
th e
ma
y
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
bywr
i
t
t
e
n
no
t
i
c
e
inth
e
ma
n
n
e
r
af
o
r
e
s
a
i
d
.
V
u
co
,
WA
tt
o
r
n
e
y
:
Fo
s
t
e
r
Ga
r
v
e
y
PC
11
1
1
3r
d
Av
e
n
u
e
,
Su
i
t
e
30
0
0
Se
a
t
t
l
e
,
WA
98
1
0
1
c/
o
:
Bo
b
St
e
r
b
a
n
k
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
Co
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
,
Lt
d
.
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
1 1
o f24
06
/
3
0
/
26
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
Ci
t
y
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Ci
t
y
Ha
l
l
52
5
N
3r
d
A
An
d
to
it
s
A
Page 153 of 194
OO
\
]
O
\
'
J
I
\O
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
30
0
5
0
Ch
a
g
r
i
n
Bl
v
d
.
Pe
p
p
e
r
Pi
k
e
,
OH
44
1
2
4
c/
o
:
Br
a
d
Go
l
d
b
e
r
g
An
d
to
it
s
At
t
o
r
n
e
y
:
Th
a
r
s
i
s
La
w
PS
32
3
26
t
h
Av
e
.
Se
a
t
t
l
e
,
WA
98
1
2
c/
o
:
Je
r
e
m
y
Ec
k
e
r
t
13
.
Di
s
p
u
t
e
Re
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
.
It
is
th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
'
in
t
e
n
t
to
wo
r
k
co
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
an
d
to
di
s
p
u
t
e
s
in
an
ef
?
c
i
e
n
t
an
d
co
s
t
-
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
ma
n
n
e
r
.
a.
Se
t
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
Me
e
t
i
n
g
.
If
an
y
di
s
p
u
t
e
ar
i
s
e
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
re
l
a
t
i
n
g
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
th
e
n
th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
sh
a
l
l
me
e
t
an
d
se
e
k
to
re
s
o
l
v
e
th
e
di
s
p
u
t
e
in
go
o
d
fa
i
t
h
,
wi
t
hi
n
te
n
(1
0
)
da
y
s
af
t
e
r
a
Pa
r
t
y
'
s
re
q
u
e
s
t
fo
r
su
c
h
a
me
e
t
i
n
g
.
b.
Un
r
e
s
o
l
v
e
d
Di
s
p
u
t
e
s
.
In
th
e
ev
e
n
t
th
a
t
th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
ar
e
un
a
b
l
e
to
re
s
o
l
ve
th ei
r
di
s
p
u
t
e
at
th
e
Se
t
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
Me
e
t
i
n
g
,
ei
t
h
e
r
Pa
r
t
y
ma
y
bu
t
is
no
t
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
to
pr
o
v
i
d
e
th
e
ot
h
er
P ar
ty
wi
t
h
a
No
t
i
c
e
of
De
f
a
u
l
t
,
se
t
t
i
n
g
ou
t
th
e
na
t
u
r
e
of
th
e
di
s
p
u
t
e
an
d
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
re
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
.
Th
e
P a rt y
is
s
u
i
n
g
th
e
No
t
i
c
e
of
De
f
a
u
l
t
is
re
f
e
r
r
e
d
to
he
r
e
i
n
as
th
e
“N
o
n
—
D
e
f
a
u
l
t
i
n
g
Pa
r
t
y
”
an
d
th e
P a rt y
re
c
e
i
v
i
n
g
th
e
No
t
i
c
e
of
De
f
a
u
l
t
is
re
f
e
r
r
e
d
to
as
th
e
“D
e
f
a
u
l
t
i
n
g
Pa
r
t
y
”
.
Th
e
De
f
a
u
l
t
i
n
g
Pa
r
ty
sh al
l
ha
v
e
te
n
(1
0
)
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
da
y
s
to
re
s
p
o
n
d
to
No
t
i
c
e
of
De
f
a
u
l
t
.
If
th
e
De
f
a
u
l
t
i
n
g
Pa
r
t
y
fa
i
l
s
to
r
RE
A
L
I
GN
EN
T
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
1 2
o f24
06
/
3
0
/
26
F G :
110
4
77
7
22
1
Page 154 of 194
..
.
..
L
l
.
.
..
.
.
I
.
._
.
_
.
.
.
.
..
-.
..
.
...
u.
.
.
I-
..
.
.
u
.
.
I
..
.
I
.
.
.
..
I
.n
I
I
..
.
.
-1
3
.
.
.
I
.
i
.
u
.
..
.
.
..
.
..
.
.
I
.
.
..
F
.
.
..
r
..
h
.
I
.—
.
.
..
.
.
..
u
.
.
_
.
..
.
I
w
.
.
.
I.
..
.
.
.
I.
.
.
.
..
.
1
..
..
.u
m
I
.
.
..
I
.u
.
_.
..
.
.
II
..
.
.
..
..
..
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
I
h
?
.
.
I
..
I
.I
..
.
.
L.
I.
_I
..
.
I
1
..
I.
.
.
L
I
I.
-
.
.
-
I
..
_
.
..
u
...
.
-
.
I
..
.
.—
..
.
.
..
.
I.
.
I
.
..
..
.
I
.
..
L
.
..
.
.m
.
.
”
.
.
.
I
.I
.
.
.
.I
.
u
.
..
.
.
.
J.
.
I.
..
.
..
.
.
.
..
I
.
..
.
.
.
I.
.
_
.
.
.I
.
.1
”
1
'-
-
.
=
'1
:
::
'
-
--
-
|
I-
.-
I q
I
..
.
.
"
I
I'
.-
1
II
-
I
l
?L
.
I
-
.
'
.
'
-
'-
FH
-
.
I-.
.'
I
'l
I.
'
I
I—
I
'
'
__
.
-
-.
|
.
I.
_
-
_
:
.
.
a _.
_
.
.
.-
15
5
$
-
EH
"
-
I
..
.
:
1
r
"
JL
l
.
-
.I
-
.
_
_
.
_
.
:
II
'
.I
.
-
L.
-
'.
I
:
I
:
.
I
.
-
.
.
I
:
u
-
_:
I
'
3-.I
'
.I
.
I'
-
I.
.I
'
.
"
1
I
1
15 16
or
th
e
di
s
p
u
t
e
re
m
a
i
n
s
un
r
e
s
o
l
v
e
d
at
th
e
en
d
of
th
e
te
n
(1
0
)
da
y
pe
r
i
o
d
,
th
e
No
n
-
De
f
a
u
l
t
in
g
Pa
r
t
y
ma
y
co
m
m
e
n
c
e
an
ac
t
i
o
n
in
Su
p
e
r
i
o
r
Co
u
r
t
to
en
f
o
r
c
e
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
Th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
inth
e
i
r
jo
i
n
t
di
s
c
r
e
t
i
o
n
mu
t
u
a
l
l
y
ag
r
e
e
to
ex
t
e
n
d
th
e
te
n
(1
0
)
da
y
pe
r
i
o
d
fo
r
cu
r
e
.
If
an
ex
t
e
n
s
io
n
ag
r
ee me
nt
is
re
a
c
h
e
d
,
th
e
No
n
-
De
f
a
u
l
t
i
n
g
Pa
r
t
y
sh
a
l
l
no
t
ex
e
r
c
i
s
e
an
y
le
g
a
l
re
m
e
d
i
e
s
un
t
i
l
un
l
es
s
th
e
ap
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
cu
r
e
pe
r
i
o
d
ha
s
ex
p
i
r
e
d
an
d
th
e
de
f
a
u
l
t
re
m
a
i
n
s
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
l
y
un
c
u
r
e
d
at
su ch
ti m e.
c.
Go
v
e
r
n
i
n
g
La
w
an
d
Ve
n
u
e
.
Th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
sh
a
l
l
be
go
v
e
r
n
e
d
by
co
n
st
r
u
ed
in
ac
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
th
e
la
w
s
of
th
e
St
a
t
e
of
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
.
Ve
n
u
e
fo
r
an
y
ju
d
i
c
i
a
l
ac
t
io
n
ar
i
si
n
gou
t
of
or
re
l
a
t
i
n
g
to
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
sh
a
l
l
li
e
in
Fr
a
n
k
l
i
n
Co
u
n
t
y
Su
p
e
r
i
o
r
Co
u
r
t
.
d.
Sp
e
c
i
?
c
Pe
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
.
Th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
l
l
y
ag
r
e
e
th
a
t
da
m
a
ge
s
ar
e
no
t
an
ad
e
q
u
a
t
e
re
m
e
d
y
fo
r
br
e
a
c
h
of
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
an
d
th
a
t
th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
ar
e
en
t
i
t
l
e
d
to
c o
sp
e
c
i
?
c
pe
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
of
al
l
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
te
r
m
s
of
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
by
an
y
Pa
r
t
y
in
de
f
a
u
l
t
he
r
e
o
f
.
te
r
m
san
d
pr
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
of
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
ar
e
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
.
6.
At
t
o
r
n
e
y
s
'
Fe
e
s
.
In
an
y
ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
or
ju
d
i
c
i
a
l
ac
t
i
o
n
to
en
f
o
r
c
e
o rde
t
er
m
in
e
a
pa
r
t
y
'
s
ri
g
h
t
s
un
d
e
r
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
th
e
pr
e
v
a
i
l
i
n
g
pa
r
t
y
(o
r
th
e
su
b
s
t
a
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
pr
e
v
ai
l
i
n
g
pa
r
t
y
,
if
no
on
e
pa
r
t
y
pr
e
v
a
i
l
s
en
t
i
r
e
l
y
)
sh
a
l
l
be
en
t
i
t
l
e
d
to
re
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
e
at
t
o
r
n
e
y
s
'
fe
e
s
,
ex
p
e
r
t
fe
e
s
,
an
d
co
s
t
s
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
fe
e
s
an
d
co
s
t
s
in
c
u
r
r
e
d
in
th
e
ap
p
e
a
l
of
an
y
ru
l
i
n
g
of
a
lo
w
e
r
c o ur
t.
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
1 3
o f24
06
/
3
0
/
26
P
110
4
7
77
2
2
.
]
Page 155 of 194
Ig
-
II
.
I
'I
-
"
..
'
I
'1
':
.I
.
-
l
-:
|
I
.
:-
.
'.
I
'
1
'-
'_
.
"
.
:-
.
.
-
_-
.
~
'
;
.
.
:
1
-
.
-
.
1
1
1
=
.
1
1
.
1
:
f
.
a
1
1
1
_
1
1
.
:
a
.
1
-
1
:1
1
:
1
1
;
1.
1
1
:
.
Em
m
i
:
'
._
_
.
'
1
I
.
1
1
I
_d
?
?
c
a
.
.
j
q
=
1
=
1
o
s
:
1
1
?
?
a.
L
I
I
f
.
1
-
t
‘
1
1
1
1
-.
_-,
_
.
I
1;
.
.
.
11
-
1
1
-
-
«?
r
-
“
1
.
.
-
14
:
1
5
15
1
5
1
:
.
-
.
.
‘1
"
.
2
:
_
.
.
-
.
.
{g
m
-
1
J
"
E
"
:
:
1
_
1
"
-
1
"1
_
.
i
.
+
_
3
:
.
51
1
1
'
.
Ri
f
t
-
1
%
.
=
‘I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
{?
v
?
'
i
f
h
?
?
f
?
'
g
II
I
I
’
E
I
-
z
.:
I
.
-
'
_
.
Il
l
-
T
H
E
:
:-
__
.-
1"
-
I'
FI
I
'
F
J
-
1
'
T
'
f
5
-
I
'
1
-
r
l
'
i
E
-
i
"_
'
|
_
l
:
'
__
'
L
-
I
I
I
j
g
'
Z
-
II
H
I
-
-I
=
1
-
'
|
.
'
F
I
I
.-
'
.
'
-'
-
-
."
Ju
l
i
-
1
'
3
”
I'
1
I
_
'
-
-I
.
".
'
.
:-
I.
-
-
.
.
..
-
I
I_
_I
-
.
_I
II
.
-
_I
T
I
I
.
.
.
.
._
-
'.
Ii
.
I
I
J
_-
:
;
-
:
¢
:
.
I
I
.'
I
I
I]
.
.
.
I
I
_
-
r
-
'-
J"
:
-
_E
-
I
:-
I'
_
.
I
_
.
.-
'I
'
.-
.
-
.
.
-
-
_
-
-'
I
_.
_
_
-
a
.
--
T-
‘
I
I
-
u
l
'
aw
n
-
q
r
:
:
_
I
_
-.
..
fl
'
.
-.
'
'-
.-
l'
-.
.
”
I
:
.
'
:
I
'
.
I
'
I.
-
-
l
-
'
I.
-.
-
.'
“
I
E
I
.
.-
.I
I
I
.
_.
I
I
.-
.
'E
'
J
-
I
'
:
.'
.
'
:
-
I
I
-_
.
'
__
.
_
.
-
.
a.
_-
a
.
_
_'
_
.
-
-
I.
-
-.
_
_
_
_
I
_1
-
-
-
-
'r
1.
.
1.
.
-
_
-
__
-
I
-
.'
I
.
.:
.
-I
I
_-
.I
I
.
-
-
__
.
I_
__
.
_.
.
_
I.
II
.
.
I
_
F“
'2
;
—
'-
_.
1
I
.J
.
.I
.
I
.
_.
_
"
-
I'
I
'
'3
'
"
.
.'
.
_J
.
'.
.
..
I
r
-
.-
-I
.I
_
r
I
.
-
-
-
..
-
II
.I
--
.
1
:I
'
:
I
I
-
.1
I-
.
-
.
.
I
E
-
I.
.
_.
‘
-
I
--
.
I.
-
I
I
-g
.
I
II
.
-I
-
.|
_
-
II
_
I.
I_
__
.
I-
.
I
_
:
'
..
I
_
r_
_
.
I
.
._
_
.I
.
_.
r
.
.
'-
.
-
.
'
:I
_
.
|
'
-.
-
I
|
-
.
gu
n
-
L
E
I
;
.l
33
'
II
I
I
.
.
.
I
-
.
-:
.
I
.
.
-I
‘
f
l
'
.
.
-'
I
-
_
.
-
_
r.
I
.
-
-
1
-
--
.
-
1
.
.
.-
-
:
-
.
1.
.-
I'
'-
.
.
.-
_
.
__
_
I.
.
,,
I.
-.
J.
.
I
I
I
._
.
4'
.
1
.
1I
|
'.
'
-.
|
12 13 14 15 16 17
14
.
N0
Th
i
r
d
-
P
a
r
t
y
Be
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
r
y
.
Th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
is
ma
d
e
an
d
en
t
e
r
e
d
in
t
o
fo
r
so
l
e
pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
an
d
be
n
e
?
t
of
th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
he
r
e
t
o
an
d
th
e
i
r
su
c
c
e
s
s
o
r
s
an
d
as
s
i
g
n
s
.
No
ot
h
e
r
pe
r
s
on
sh
a
ll
ha
v
e
an
y
ri
g
h
t
of
ac
t
i
o
n
ba
s
e
d
up
o
n
an
y
pr
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
of
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
15
.
Se
v
e
r
a
b
i
l
i
g
.
Th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
do
e
s
no
t
vi
o
l
a
t
e
an
y
fe
d
e
r
a
l
or
st
a
t
e
st
a
t
u
te
,
ru
l
e,
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
or
co
m
m
o
n
la
w
kn
o
w
n
;
bu
t
an
y
pr
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
wh
i
c
h
is
fo
u
n
d
to
be
in
v
a
l
i
d
or
in
of
an
y
st
a
t
u
t
e
,
ru
l
e
,
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
or
co
m
m
o
n
la
w
sh
a
l
l
be
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
nu
l
l
an
d
vo
i
d
,
th
e
re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
pr
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
Vi
a
b
l
e
an
d
in
ef
f
e
c
t
.
16
.
Co
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
in
Ex
e
c
u
t
i
o
n
of
Do
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
.
Th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
ag
r
e
e
to
pr
o
p
er
l
y
an
d
pr
o
m
p
t
l
y
ex
e
c
u
t
e
an
d
de
l
i
v
e
r
an
y
an
d
al
l
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
th
a
t
ma
y
be
ne
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t o
r e n d e r
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
pr
a
c
t
i
c
a
l
l
y
ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
.
Th
i
s
Pa
r
a
g
r
a
p
h
sh
a
l
l
no
t
re
q
u
i
r
e
th
e
ex
e
c
u
t
i
o
n
an
y
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
th
a
t
ex
p
a
n
d
s
,
al
t
e
r
s
or
in
an
y
wa
y
ch
a
n
g
e
s
th
e
te
r
m
s
of
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
17
.
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
s
.
Th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
in
c
l
u
d
e
s
th
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
ex
h
i
b
i
t
s
wh
i
c
h
ar
e
in
c
o
rp
o
r
at
e
d
by
re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
he
r
e
i
n
:
1.
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
A:
Lo
t
10
Ph
a
s
e
1
Si
t
e
Pl
a
n
&
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
nt
2.
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
B:
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
Bi
d
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
No
.
1
18
.
Su
c
c
e
s
s
o
r
s
an
d
As
s
i
g
n
s
.
Th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
sh
a
l
l
be
bi
n
d
i
n
g
up
o
n
an
d
in
u
re
toth
e
be
n
e
?
t
of
th
e
he
i
r
s
,
ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
o
r
s
,
ex
e
c
u
t
o
r
s
,
su
c
c
e
s
s
o
r
s
in
in
t
e
r
e
s
t
an
d
as
s
i
g
n
s
of
ea
c
h
o fth
e
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
1 4
24
06
/
3
0
/
26
F G :
11 04 77 72 2.1
Page 156 of 194
_
-
:.
.
-
..
.
-
I
|
-
:
I
'
:
Il
.
-
.
.
..
-
_
.
-
iI
I
I
I
I
I
-
II
H
I
'
I
I
-
E
I
I
'-
-.
I
.
I
I
"
"
:
-
.I
I
-
I
I‘
-
E.
.
'
-
?a
t
;
.‘
.
i
—
é
?
?
?
‘
'~
‘
:
‘
:
i
:
§
i
:
I
-
.
r
g
_
:
v
'.:
-
¥
"
:
.
-
"
"
'
_-
I
-'
-
'
I
::
‘
"
J
:
'
.
'
!
r
_
=
"
;
;
'i
E
-
E
l
a
?
.
Er
a
-
”
E
m
a
“
3:
:
“
'
*'
Ha
i
l
-
T
.
#‘
j
é
g
j
;
*‘
F
?
c
r
'-
.
_
j
4
_
:
=
.
u
.
:
‘
7
‘
.
=
.
?
*
'
.
_
#
t
‘
t
-
._
_.
I
II
i
F
H
I
I
'
f
I
-
I
I
—
I
?
-
I
I
I
L
-
II
I
I
I
"
II
I
I
I
I
E
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
'
I'
I
'
I.
_
-
I
I
II
I
-
Z
:
-
.
LE
E
-
I
I
EI
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
12
7
3
*
?
m
e
:5
“
-
:1
5
:
.-
-
"
?
=
"
'f
‘
r
‘
J
J
'
F
F
'
F
I
T
.
-
'"
:
.
.J
?
i
;
:
.
~
1
"
1
5
.
'
-
2
;
"
-
.
"
_
:
'
.
'
.
:
'
.
!
I
'
I
.
'
.
-
n
_.
r
-
“
f
-
J
ii
'
g
s
'
”
'
".
"
“
.
"
.
-
’
".
‘
.
t
'
i
-"
_
.
-"
'
.
'
~
e
'
f“
:
-.
I
_.
I
.-
:.
I
'
'_
.
I
.'
.
_-
.I
.
.'
I
I
r
__
.I
.
-
.-
:_
_
a
.
'
-
H
"I
I
'
'
I.
'
_
I
.-
-.
'
..
-
I.
.
.
I
.
..
f.
I.
I
-
.-
-
I
I
_I
I
.I
-
-.
.
.-
r
‘I
_
'
I
:I
.-
.-
F'
I
I!
pa
r
t
i
e
s
.
An
y
re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
in
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
to
a
sp
e
c
i
?
c
a
l
l
y
na
m
e
d
pa
r
t
y
bede
e
m
e
d
toap
p
l
y
to
an
y
su
c
c
e
s
s
o
r
,
he
i
r
,
ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
o
r
,
ex
e
c
u
t
o
r
or
as
s
i
g
n
of
su
c
h
pa
r
t
y
wh
o
ac
q
u
ir
e
d
it
s
in
t
e
r
e
s
t
in
co
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
th
e
te
r
m
s
of
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
or
un
d
e
r
la
w
.
19
.
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
No
t
a
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Th
e
Pa
r
t
i
e
s
ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
th
a
t
th
i
s
Ha
r
r
i
s
Ro
a
d
Re
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
is
no
t
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
me
a
n
i
n
g
of
RC
W
36
.
7
0
B
.
1
7
0
—
.
2
1
0
.
Th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
do
e
s
no
t
a p p r o v eth
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
or
se
t
fo
r
t
h
th
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
or
ot
h
e
r
pr
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
th
a
t
ap
p
l
y
t
a n d /o rgo
v
e
r
n
orve
s
t
th
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
us
e
,
an
d
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
of
th
e
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y.
An
yap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
on
(
s
)
fo
r
su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
of
th
e
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
,
bi
n
d
i
n
g
si
t
e
pl
a
n
ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
,
la
n
d
us
e
ap
p
r
ov
a
l
orbu
i
l
d
i
ngpe
r
m
i
t
s
fo
r
th
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
sh
a
l
l
be
su
b
j
e
c
t
to
ap
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
pr
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
se
t
fo
r
t
h
in
t h e
P as c oMu
n
i
c
i
pa
l
Co
d
e
.
IN
WI
T
N
E
S
S
WH
E
R
E
O
F
,
th
e
pa
r
t
i
e
s
he
r
e
t
o
ex
e
c
u
t
e
d
th
i
s
Ag
re
e me
nt
th
e
da
y
an
d
ye
a
r
?r
s
t
ab
o
v
e
wr
i
t
t
e
n
.
[S
I
G
N
A
T
U
R
E
S
ON
TH
E
FO
L
L
O
W
I
N
G
PA
G
E]
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
1 5
24
06
/
3
0
/
26
F G :
11 04 77 72 2.1
Page 157 of 194
\O
O
O
Q
O
N
U
I
A
U
J
N
r
—
I
CI
T
Y
OF
PA
S
C
O
By
_
_
_
_
_
—
Ha
r
o
l
d
St
e
w
a
r
t
,
Ci
t
y
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
AT
T
E
S
T
:
Kr
y
s
t
l
e
Sh
a
n
k
s
,
Ci
t
y
Cl
e
r
k
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
AS
TO
FO
R
M
:
Da
n
i
e
l
P.
Ke
n
n
y
,
In
t
e
r
i
m
Ci
t
y
At
t
o
r
n
e
y
ST
A
T
E
OF
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
)
ss
.
vv
Co
u
n
t
y
of
Fr
a
n
k
l
i
n
I
ce
r
t
i
f
y
th
a
t
I
kn
o
w
or
ha
v
e
sa
t
i
s
f
a
c
t
o
r
y
ev
i
d
e
n
c
e
th
a
t
pe
r
s
o
n
wh
o
ap
p
e
a
r
e
d
be
f
o
r
e
me
,
an
d
ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
d
th
a
t
s/
h
e
si
g
n
e
d
th
i
s
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
,
on
oa
t
h
st
a
t
e
d
th
a
t
s/
h
e
wa
s
au
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
to
ex
e
cu
t
e
th
e
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
an
d
ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
d
it
as
th
e
,
of
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
th
a
t
ex
e
c
u
t
e
d
th
e
wi
t
hi
n
an
d
fo
r
e
g
o
i
n
g
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
,
to
be
th
e
fr
e
e
an
d
vo
l
u
n
t
a
r
y
ac
t
of
su
c
h
pa
r
t
y
of
th
e
us
e
s
an
d
pu
r
p
os
e
s
me
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
in
th
e
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
.
No
t
a
r
y
Pu
b
l
i
c
in
an
d
fo
r
th
e
St
a
t
e
of
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
,
re
s
i
d
i
n
g
at
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
N
TAG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
1 6
24
06
/
3
0
/
26
F G :
11 04 77 72 2.1
Page 158 of 194
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
N
TAG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
1 7
o f24
06
/
3
0
/
26
M y
c oex
p
i
r
e
s
:
F G :
11 04 77 72 2.1
12
3
4
5
6
Page 159 of 194
ad
v
:
[\
J
\O
O
O
\
I
O
\
U
I
-
l
>
U.
)
10
11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
IN
WI
T
N
E
S
S
WH
E
R
E
O
F
,
th
e
pa
r
t
i
e
s
he
r
e
t
o
ex
e
c
u
t
e
d
th
i
s
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
th
e
da
y
an
d
ye
ar
?r
s
t
ab
o
v
e
wr
i
t
t
e
n
.
VW
A
-
P
A
S
C
O
,
LL
C
,
an
Oh
i
o
li
m
i
t
e
d
li
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
co
m
p
a
n
y
By
:
Do
m
i
n
i
c
A.
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
,
Jr
.
It
s
:
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
ST
A
T
E
OF
OH
I
O
)
)
Co
u
n
t
y
of
)
I
ce
r
t
i
f
y
th
a
t
I
kn
o
w
or
ha
v
e
sa
t
i
s
f
a
c
t
o
r
y
ev
i
d
e
n
c
e
th
a
t
pe
r
s
o
n
wh
o
ap
p
e
a
r
e
d
be
f
o
r
e
me
,
an
d
s /h e
ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
d
th
a
t
s/
h
e
si
g
n
e
d
th
i
s
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
,
on
oa
t
h
st
a
t
e
d
th
a
t
s/
h
e
wa
s
au
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
to
ex
e
c
ut
e
th
e
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
an
d
ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
d
it
as
th
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
of
VW
A
-
P
a
s
c
o
,
LL
C
,
th
a
t
ex
e
c
u
t
e
d
th
e
wi
t
h
i
n
an
d
fo
r
e
g
o
i
n
g
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
,
to
be
th
e
fr
e
e
an
d
vo
l
u
n
t
a
r
y
ac
t
of
su
c
h
pa
r
t
y
of
th
e
us
e
s
an d
pu
r
p
o
s
e
s
me
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
in
th
e
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
.
SS
.
No
t
a
r
y
Pu
b
l
i
c
in
an
d
f
r
th
St
a
t
e
of
Oh
i
o
,
re
s
i
d
i
n
g
at
My
co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
ex
p
i
r
e
s
:
AL
I
S
O
N
AM
B
R
O
S
E
No
t
a
r
y
Pu
b
l
i
c
St
a
t
e
of
Oh
i
o
My
Co
m
m
.
Ex
p
i
r
e
s
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
21
,
20
2
9
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
1 8
o f24
06
/
3
0
/
26
h.
(/
W
0/7
Page 160 of 194
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
A
HA
R
R
I
S
RO
A
D
RE
A
L
I
G
N
M
EN
T
-AP
R
I
L3,20
2
6
E
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
N
TAG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
1 9
o f24
06
/
3
0
/
26
a
5:
5
I
z
r
x
t
V
|\
I»
!
.l
l
.1
I
3!:
1
El
i
md
w
n
lo
t
-
1
M1
0
3
)
mu
m
s
-
m
a
ul
n
a
-
d
mu
,
Page 161 of 194
>.
.
,
FU
T
U
R
E
PH
A
S
E
AL
T
E
RN
A
T
E
BI
D
SC
O
P
E
HA
R
R
I
S
RO
A
D
RE
A
L
I
G
NM
E
N
T
-AP
R
I
L
3,20
2
6
E
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
2 0
o f24
06
/
3
0
/
26
Ifnrrrrrra
__
*—
Se
ct
i
on A
ta
m
a
l
iv
e
sa y-am
,
ma
n
an
m
m
d
d
e
-
y
In
n
-
o
d
d
E x h i
B
F G :
11 04 77 72 2.1
34
5
6
Page 162 of 194
m.
L
.
.
.
I
.
..
.
.
I
.
.
....
.
.
_
..
.
.
L
.
..
.
T
_
.
I
.L
.
.
.
_
r
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
_
.
l
.
.r
l
.
.
_
.
.I
...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
u
.
.
..
.
EH
M
W
.
?n
i
a
l
..
.
.
.
.
w
n
—
m
..
_
.
_
I
.
._
_
I
.
I
"
_
.
_
_
.
.
I
?r
m
—
A
L
U
M
L
H
M
H
.
.
_.
..
I
.
.
E
-
..
.
.
.
.
_
-
..
.
.
.
.
-.
.
.
.
.
.
..
I
I
.
?
”
..
.
..
m
.
.LE
W
“
..
.
.
.
.
.
w
.
.
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
i
u
m
.
.
.
:
.
u.
.
2.
1
%
.
.
.
..
I
I
.
"
.
I
.
.I
.
.
u
.
.
I
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
I
.
_
.
..
I
.
.
Lp
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
uI
.
.
.
.
..
..
.
.
.
.
I
.
“
..
H
.
_
.
.
.
M
I
.
.
.
.
.
£
Wh
a
m
.I
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
u
.
_
.
.
"t
h
a
n
“
"n
.
..
.
.
.
m
.
u
H
I
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
_.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
..
I
.
..
.
.
u
.
.
I
..
.
_
_
._
.
.
.
.
.
r1
.
?.
.
-
.
I
r
_.
.
.
.
.
n
.
.
..
.
.
.
‘I
..
_
u.
L
l-
I
.
.
:
E
.
I
l
_
h
u
u
—
I
.
.
.
.
*
.
m
.
d
l
.
l
.
u
.
.
.
.
-
.
.
.
I
.
.
—
I
-
”5
.
.
.
MW
..
-
I
.t
h
-
a
.
”.
u
.
.
.
.
*
.
.
.
._
.
.
.
—
L
..
.
I
1.
1
I.
..
.
u
l
.
r
.
.
u
I
.
.
..
.
I
.
.
.
.
_
....
.
.
.
hw
n
l
.1
.
.
I
.
_
.
.
.
_
.
I
.
.
n
m
.
.
.
r
m
I
m
_
I
.
.
..
u
.
?
.
.
%
.
1
.
.
.
.
m
.
.
u
.
L
m
u
.
.
.
L
.
.
.
.
I
.
.
?
n
.
.
.
l
.
.
.
.
l
u
-
_.
u
.
"
.
.
.
"
I
H
W
F
.
“W
u
.n
.
.
_
.
.
.
_
m
n
.
..
.
.
.
W
.
.
I
I
.
Hu
n
g
?
.
..
u
w
?
v
m
x
.
.
..
.
..
m.
.
.
..
.
_
_
.
_
_
.
_.
'-
'
u'
d
'
l
'
l
l
;
'
.I
-
I
-
1$
I
h
.
'-
'-
-'
ul
--
I.
i
-
.I
I
-
h
u
I
I
'
I
l
'
I
I
-
I.
I
-
.l
'
n
l
'
-I
.
'
.
r
I
.
-
I
'
-
I
I
'
I
J—
u
—
I
-
I
-
I
I
_l
Ia
Ii
.l
.
II
I
'
I
-
u
'
I
—
J
L
‘I
L
'
.
I
I
"
I
'
-
r
|
'
-
'
..
.
-
e
m
;
I
:
El
f
-
{
I
'
-
_
I
.
-:
_
.
*1
.
-
-_
-
I
I
-
'I
-
L:
n-
m
r
F1
[4
'
_-
:
'
J
-
i
I
'
I
I
.I
'
I
'
I
"'
I
-
I
.
'
'-
?i
t
-
E
L
'
I
I
'
I
I
-
I
L
.
E
II
I
-
""
"
"
"
'
1
"
"
'.
[I
E
-
r
u
-
_.
'
I”
.
_:--
-
'
.
I
I
'-
I
-
i
:I'-
II
I
'
_
'
.
I
-
I
'
.
-:
.
.
.
..
.
I
.
_I
.
l
I.
L
.
I
.
H
l
II
;
I
.
1.
L
l
.
_
h.
..
.
.
+
.1
.
.
n
.
.—
.r
_
..
.I
I
.
L
I
H
I
I
I
I
..
.
OO
\
]
O
\
U
I
-
b
b
J
N
!
—
‘
WW
W
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
r
—
r
—
t
—
I
r
—
d
r
—
t
—
t
v
—
r
—
t
r
—
t
—
I
WN
F
-
‘
O
O
O
O
V
Q
L
I
I
A
W
N
P
—
‘
O
C
O
O
N
C
N
L
I
I
A
U
J
N
P
—
‘
O
C
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
—B
a
r
g
a
i
n
an
d
Sa
l
e
De
e
d
Fo
r
m
AF
T
E
R
RE
C
O
R
D
I
N
G
RE
T
U
R
N
DO
C
U
M
E
N
T
TO
:
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
Ci
t
y
Cl
e
r
k
Pa
s
c
o
Ci
t
y
Ha
l
l
3r
d
Fl
o
o
r
52
5
N.
3r
d
Av
e
n
u
e
Pa
s
c
o
WA
99
3
0
1
BA
R
G
A
I
N
AN
D
SA
L
E
DE
E
D
Gr
a
n
t
o
r
:
VW
A
-
P
a
s
c
o
,
LL
C
,
an
Oh
i
o
li
m
i
t
e
d
li
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
co
m
p
a
n
y
Gr
a
n
t
e
e
:
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
Ab
b
r
e
v
i
a
t
e
d
Le
g
a
l
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
:
Lo
t
10
of
Re
c
o
r
d
Su
r
v
e
y
No
.
19
5
6
3
1
6
(co mp
l
et
e
le
g
a
l
de
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
at
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
A)
As
s
e
s
s
o
r
'
s
Ta
x
Pa
r
c
e
l
No
:
11
5
2
1
0
0
4
0
Th
e
Gr
a
n
t
o
r
,
VW
A
-
P
A
S
C
O
,
LL
C
,
an
Oh
i
o
li
m
i
t
e
d
li
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
co
m
p
a
n
y
,
fo
r
an
d
in
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
su
m
of
Te
n
Do
l
l
a
r
s
($
1
0
.
0
0
)
an
d
ot
h
e
r
go
o
d
an
d
va
l
u
a
b
l
e
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
ti
o
n
,
th
e
re
c
e
i
p
t
an
d
su
f
?
c
i
e
n
c
y
of
wh
i
c
h
is
he
r
e
b
y
ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
d
,
he
r
e
b
y
ba
r
g
a
i
n
s
,
se
l
l
s
,
an
d
co nv ey
s
to
th
e
Gr
a
n
t
e
e
CI
T
Y
OF
PA
S
C
O
,
a
mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
co
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
St
a
t
e
of
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
,
an
d
it
s
su
c
c
e
s
s
o
r
s
an
d
as
s
i
g
n
s
,
th
e
re
a
l
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
le
g
a
l
l
y
de
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
in
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
A
an
d
de
p
i
c
t
e
d
in
B,
su
b
j
e
c
t
on
l
y
to
ma
t
t
e
r
s
se
t
fo
r
t
h
in
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C,
si
t
u
a
t
e
d
in
th
e
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
in
Fr
a
n
k
l
i
n
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
,
fo
r
pu
b
l
i
c
fo
r
ri
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
pu
r
p
o
s
e
s
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
wi
t
h
o
u
t
li
m
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
pu
b
l
i
c
ve hi
cu
la r
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
tr
a
v
e
l
,
gr
a
d
i
n
g
,
st
r
e
e
t
s
,
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
,
mu
l
t
i
-
u
s
e
pa
t
h
s
,
st
r
e
e
t
li
g
h
t
s
,
an
d
ut
i
l
i
t
ie
s
(i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
wi
t
h
o
u
t
li
m
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
wa
t
e
r
,
se
w
e
r
,
st
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
,
el
e
c
t
r
i
c
,
ga
s
,
te
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s,
ca bl
e
an
d
?b
e
r
op
t
i
c
s
,
wh
e
t
h
e
r
ow
n
e
d
or
op
e
r
a
t
e
d
by
Gr
a
n
t
e
e
or
ot
h
e
r
ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
pr
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
se
r
v
i
ce
to
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
2 1
o f24
06
/
3
0
/
26
F G :
110
4
77
7
22
.
l
Page 163 of 194
\O
O
O
Q
O
‘
x
U
l
-
B
U
J
N
r
—
t
Gr
a
n
t
e
e
an
d
it
s
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
vi
a
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
ri
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
pu
r
s
u
a
n
t
to
pe
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
by
Gr
a
n
t
e
e
by
fr
a
n
c
h
i
s
e
,
pe
r
m
i
t
or
ot
h
e
r
au
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
)
.
DA
T
E
D
th
i
s
da
y
of
,
20
2
6
by
Gr
a
n
t
o
r
,
VW
A
-
P
A
S
C
O
,
LL
C
.
VW
A
-
P
A
S
C
O
,
LL
C
.
By
:
Do
m
i
n
i
c
A.
Vi
s
c
o
n
s
i
,
Jr
.
It
s
:
ST
A
T
E
OF
OH
I
O
)
)
ss
Co
u
n
t
y
of
I
ce
r
t
i
f
y
th
a
t
I
kn
o
w
or
ha
v
e
sa
t
i
s
f
a
c
t
o
r
y
ev
i
d
e
n
c
e
th
a
t
pe
r
s
o
n
wh
o
ap
p
e
a
r
e
d
be
f
o
r
e
me
,
an
d
s/
h
e
ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
d
th
a
t
s/
h
e
si
g
n
e
d
th
i
s
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
,
on
oa
t
h
st
a
t
e
d
th
a
t
s/
h
e
wa
s
au
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
to
ex
e
c
u
t
e
th
e
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
an
d
ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
d
it
as
th
e
ma
n
a
g
e
r
of
VW
A
-
P
a
s
c
o
,
LL
C
,
th
a
t
ex
e
c
u
t
e
d
th
e
wi
t
h
i
n
an
d
fo
r
e
g
o
i
n
g
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
,
to
be
th
e
fr
e
e
an
d
vo
l
u
n
t
a
r
y
ac
t
of
su
c
h
pa
r
t
y
of
th
e
us
e
s
an
d
pu
r
p
o
s
e
s
me
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
in
th
e
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
.
No
t
a
r
y
Pu
b
l
i
c
in
an
d
f
r
th
St
a
t
e
of
Oh
i
o
,
re
s
i
d
i
n
g
at
My
CO
I
I
l
I
I
l
l
S
S
l
O
l
’
l
ex
p
l
r
e
s
:
AL
I
S
O
N
AM
B
R
O
S
E
No
t
a
r
y
Pu
b
l
i
c
St
a
t
e
of
Oh
i
o
My
Co
m
m
.
Ex
p
i
r
e
s
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
21
,
20
2
9
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
2 2
o f24
06
/
3
0
/
26
L4
D O
Page 164 of 194
..
.
.
_
_
.
:
.n
.
.
.
.
.
_
_
_
_
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
u
_
n
.
.
n
.
n
._
.
.
w
.
.
a
.
n
.
.
a.
..
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
”
.
“
..
.
.
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
HP
.
.
.
-
..
.
.
.
"
.
.
_
m
.
1
.
.
.
-
“a
u
r
a
-
m
.
.3
”
.
.
.
H.
..
.u
.
.
.
-_
_
-
_
.
”
u
”I
“
in
.
I.
I
1
-
n
l
__
I
.
.-
.x
#:
1
1
1
9
4
..
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
u
I.
.
.
.1
I.
..
1
I1
.r
...
"I
OO
\
]
O
\
L
l
l
-
I
>
U
J
N
v
—
d
AC
C
E
P
T
E
D
th
i
s
_
da
y
of
,
20
2
6
fo
r
Gr
a
n
t
e
e
,
CI
T
Y
OF
PA
S
C
O
,
by
:
By
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Ha
r
o
l
d
St
e
w
a
r
t
,
Ci
t
y
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
AT
T
E
S
T
:
Kr
y
s
t
l
e
Sh
a
n
k
s
,
CM
C
De
p
u
t
y
Ci
t
y
Cl
e
r
k
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
AS
TO
FO
R
M
:
Da
n
i
e
l
P.
Ke
n
n
y
,
In
t
e
r
i
m
Ci
t
y
At
t
o
r
n
e
y
ST
A
T
E
OF
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
)
Co
u
n
t
y
of
Fr
a
n
k
l
i
n
)
I
ce
r
t
i
f
y
th
a
t
I
kn
o
w
or
ha
v
e
sa
t
i
s
f
a
c
t
o
r
y
ev
i
d
e
n
c
e
th
a
t
pe
r
s
o
n
wh
o
ap
p
e
a
r
e
d
be
f
o
r
e
me
,
an d
s /
ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
d
th
a
t
s/
h
e
si
g
n
e
d
th
i
s
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
,
on
oa
t
h
st
a
t
e
d
th
a
t
s/
h
e
wa
s
au
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
to
e x ec ut
e
th
e
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
an
d
ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
d
it
as
th
e
,
of
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
th
a
t
ex
e
c
u
t
e
d
th
e
an
d
fo
r
e
g
o
i
n
g
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
,
to
be
th
e
fr
e
e
an
d
vo
l
u
n
t
a
r
y
ac
t
of
su
c
h
pa
r
t
y
of
th
e
us
e
s
an
d
pu
r
po
s
es
me
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
in
th
e
in
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
.
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
2 3
o f24
06
/
3
0
/
26
F G :
11 04 77 72 2.1
Page 165 of 194
..
.
.
.
n
.
.
.
.
.
.
km
“1
.
.
.
.
5.
.
.
”.
5
.
.
.
.
.
.
_
u
.
.
.
.
_.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
5
.
..
”.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.L
H
—
h
—
“
?
J
—
H
T
W
.
”
he
m
—
u
n
m
a
n
?
J
.
iI
m
H
I
W
H
H
m
H
.
.
m
-
u
u
.
n
+
I.
.
.
“
..
L.
.
.
.
I
II
..
n.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
H
.
.
H
I
..
.
H
.F
”
.
.
.
.
.
“
I
.
.
.
h
.
_
.
.
nl
u
-
-
I
I
.5
5
5
“H
.u
.
.I
l
.
r
.
1
1.
.
.
.-
.-
..
I
I
.
.
.
.u
.
“
.-
I
In
.
"
.
_u
.
-
1
I
.
.
I
I.
-
LI
.
.
.
..
II
.
.
I
1
.—
«a
n
.
.
.
p5
,
.
.
.
5.
.
FE
E
.
.
.
.-
..
5
-
5
.1
5
”
””
1
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
u
l
.
_
_
.
.
.
.
I”
.
.—
..
..
I
L
r
.n
..
_
.
I
l
u
.
..
...
?h
l
..
.
.
I
I—
.I
.
.-
.
.
_.
I.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
u
.
.
u
.
.
“
|
:
..
.
.
.
.
u
.
In
n
“
1
In
.
.
h.
..
.
E
i
u
RE
A
L
I
GN
M
E
NT
AG
R
E
E
M
E
NT
Pa
g
e
2 4
o f24
06
/
3
0
/
26
No
t
a
ry
P ub
li
c
inan
d
fo
r
th
e
St
a
t
e
of
Wa
s
hi
n
g
t
on
,
re
s
i
d
i
n
g
at
\O
O
O
\
]
O
'
\
U
I
-
I
>
U
J
I
\
J
p
—
a
My
co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
ex
p
i
r
e
s
:
P G :
110
4
7
77
2
2
.]
Page 166 of 194
1
FG: 102705068.5
AGREEMENT ON FUNDING AND CONSTRUCTION OF
BROADMOOR INCREMENT AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
This Agreement on Funding and Construction of Broadmoor Increment Area Roadway
Improvements (this “Agreement”) is entered into by and among the City of Pasco, Washington
(the “City”), Pasco Public Facilities District, a public facilities district created and existing
pursuant to Chapter 35.57 RCW (the “PFD”), and Broadmoor Properties, LLC (“BP,” and, together
with the City and the PFD, the ‘Parties”) to provide for certain matters relating to the funding and
construction of roadway improvements within and serving the City’s Broadmoor Increment Area
created by Ordinance No. 4618 of the City. The City, PFD and BP are each a “Party” and
collectively the “Parties” to this Agreement. The Parties agree as follows.
Part One. RECITALS
A. By the passage of Ordinance No. 4618, the City Council of the City created a tax increment
area designated as the Broadmoor Increment Area (the “Increment Area”) that became effective
on June 1, 2023, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 39.114 RCW (the “Act”).
B. The purpose of creating the Increment Area is to encourage new private developments
within the Increment Area that would not reasonably be expected to occur without the City’s
provision of certain public infrastructure improvements within and/or outside of and serving the
Increment Area.
C. These public infrastructure improvements include certain roadway improvements
described in Exhibit A attached to this Agreement and shown on the Broadmoor Development Lot
Layout Sketch attached to this Agreement as Exhibit B (together with Exhibit A, the “roadway
project descriptions”).
D. The roadway improvements described and shown in green in the roadway project
descriptions represent those roadway improvements having an estimated cost of $23 million (the
“initial roadway improvements”) that the City had been planning to finance with the issuance in
August 2024 of approximately $24 million of non-voted limited tax general obligation bonds
(“LTGO bonds”) of the City as authorized by the Act and other applicable law.
E. The roadway improvements described and shown in red in the roadway project descriptions
represent additional roadway improvements having an estimated cost of $11.5 million (the
“additional roadway improvements”) that the City had been planning to finance with a second,
later issuance of additional LTGO bonds in a principal amount within the maximum principal
amount of $39 million authorized to finance roadway improvements serving the Increment Area.
F. The City’s LTGO bonds used to finance roadway improvements serving the Increment Area
will be issued as general obligations of the City to which the City will pledge its full faith, credit
Page 167 of 194
2
FG: 102705068.5
and resources as well as “tax allocation revenues” (as defined by the Act) expected to be received
by the City from regular property taxes levied on new private developments within the Increment
Area.
G. The City intends and expects that tax allocation revenues received by the City from new
private developments within the Increment Area during the term of its LTGO bonds issued to
finance roadway improvements serving the Increment Area will be sufficient to pay or reimburse
all of the City’s debt service payments on those LTGO bonds, either directly from current tax
allocation revenues received by the City or by using later-received tax allocation revenues to
reimburse the City for earlier debt service payments that were required to be made from the City’s
other available tax revenues or other lawfully available money.
H. BP is the current owner of the majority of the land included in the Increment Area, and the
PFD wishes to purchase approximately 20 acres of land generally depicted as Lots 20 and 24 on
the Broadmoor Development Lot Layout Sketch (to be created by future subdivision) within the
Increment Area from BP to serve as the site for the construction by the PFD of a new Aquatic
Center, as approved by the voters of the City, that would be served by the additional roadway
improvements.
I. To encourage and facilitate the financing and construction by the City of the additional
roadway improvements earlier than otherwise planned by the City, BP and the PFD have agreed
to enter into this Agreement to provide certain financial accommodations to the City with respect
to the City’s receipts of tax allocation revenues needed to pay debt service payments on the
additional LTGO bonds required to finance the additional roadway improvements.
J. The financial accommodations to be provided by BP and the PFD to the City pursuant to
this Agreement generally consist of the agreement by BP and the PFD to advance funds to the City
to reimburse the City for the City’s debt service payments on the additional LTGO bonds made
from the City’s other available tax revenues or other lawfully available money (thereby mitigating
budgetary impacts on the City’s general fund) as a result of a shortfall in tax allocation revenues
available for that debt service payment purpose during the term of the City’s LTGO bonds, with
those shortfall advances made by BP and the PFD to be refunded to BP and the PFD from tax
allocation revenues received by the City in subsequent years when such collections, if any, are
sufficient to be available for such reimbursement purposes during the term of this Agreement.
K. The Parties agree that the actions to be taken by them pursuant to this Agreement are
intended to encourage the construction of new private developments within the Increment Area as
promptly as practicable so that the total amount of tax allocation revenues available to the City for
the payment of its LTGO bonds issued to finance the roadway improvements serving the Increment
Area will be timely received by the City in amounts sufficient to pay or reimburse, in full, the
City’s debt service payments on those bonds.
Page 168 of 194
3
FG: 102705068.5
Part Two. AGREEMENT TERMS
1. City Financing and Construction of Broadmoor Roadway Improvements.
(a) Subject to the City’s determination that municipal bond market conditions are acceptable
to the City, the City will issue tax-exempt LTGO bonds in a maximum principal amount of up to
$34.5 million to finance roadway improvements serving the Increment Area, including up to $11.5
million in principal amount of additional LTGO bonds allocated to the construction of the
additional roadway improvements described and shown in red in the roadway project descriptions.
(b) BP will dedicate and convey to the City by statutory warranty deed, at no cost to the City,
all land and interests in land required by the City for construction of the additional roadway
improvements.
(c) The City shall have full control over the design and construction of the roadway
improvements, including but not limited to decisions concerning the selection of contractors
pursuant to applicable public works laws and decisions concerning the cost of construction.
(d) If the Aquatics Center is to be built in proximity to or within the increment Area, the City
will undertake best efforts to: (1) construct the additional roadway improvements in accordance
with City standards necessary to accommodate the traffic impacts of the PFD’s proposed Aquatics
Center; (2) coordinate City’s construction of the additional roadway improvements to the extent
practicable with the PFD’s schedule for the construction of the Aquatics Center; and (3) include
necessary frontage improvements related to the Aquatics Center, such as sidewalks, in the design
of Road 108.
(e) The City will award bids for and manage the construction to completion of the roadway
improvements. The City will own, operate and maintain the roadway improvements ; the roadway
improvements shall be used for general public use; and neither BP nor the PFD shall have any
special legal entitlements to use the roadway improvements.
2. SEPA and Other Conditions.
(a) This Agreement is subject to the compliance with applicable federal and state laws,
including prior compliance with applicable requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act
(“SEPA”). In particular, the City’s obligation to construct the roadway improvements is expressly
limited by completion of SEPA review through issuance of a threshold determination; the City’s
consideration of the SEPA review and its determination whether it is appropriate to proceed with
or without additional or revised conditions based on the SEPA review; and the resolution of any
challenges to construction of the roadway improvements in a manner reasonably acceptable to the
City.
Page 169 of 194
4
FG: 102705068.5
(b) This Agreement is subject further to the City obtaining all required permits for construction
of the roadway improvements, and the receipt of responsible bids to construct the roadway
improvements serving the Increment Area at a cost that does not exceed the proceeds of the City’s
LTGO bonds available for that purpose.
3. Financial Accommodations to be Provided by BP and the PFD to the City.
(a) If tax allocation revenues received by the City derived from regular property taxes on new
private developments within the Increment Area for any tax collection year are not sufficient to
pay 100% of the debt service that was due and payable on the City’s LTGO bonds issued for the
roadway improvements in that tax collection year, with the result that the City is required to use
and apply other available tax revenues to meet that shortfall in tax allocation revenues, then BP
will advance 70% and the PFD will advance 30% of that shortfall to the extent allocated to the
debt service payments on the additional LTGO bonds used to finance the additional roadway
improvements. For this purpose, a ratable portion of each maturity of the City’s outstanding LTGO
bonds issued to finance all of the roadway improvements serving the Increment Area will be
allocated to the financing of the additional roadway improvements. For example, if the City issues
$33,500,000 principal amount of LTGO bonds, and $10,500,000 of that principal amount is used
to finance the additional roadway improvements, then 31% of the debt service payable on the
LTGO bonds in that tax collection year will be allocated to the additional roadway improvements.
The PFD’s 30% shortfall advance for any tax collection year shall be subject to a cap of $300,000.
(b) The City, by January 15 of the calendar year immediately following each applicable tax
collection year, will provide to BP and the PFD a statement, based on reports and information
received by the City from the Franklin County Treasurer and the debt service payment schedule
for the City’s LTGO bonds issued for the roadway improvements serving the Increment Area (a
“shortfall report”), showing (i) the total amount of tax allocation revenues with respect to regular
property taxes levied for the applicable tax collection year received by the City in that tax
collection year, (ii) the pro rata allocations of those tax allocation revenues applied to debt service
payments made on the respective portions of the LTGO bonds allocable to the financing of the
initial roadway improvements and the additional roadway improvements, (iii) the respective
shortfalls in tax allocation revenues related to the debt service payments made on those portions
of the LTGO bonds, and (iv) calculations of the 70% and 30% portions of the shortfall related to
the debt service payments on the additional LTGO bonds required to be advanced by BP and the
PFD, respectively, to the City (the “shortfall advances”). By February 15 of the calendar year
immediately following the applicable tax collection year, BP and the PFD will transfer their
respective shortfall advances to the City.
(c) The obligations of BP to the City under this Agreement shall continue in full force and
effect for so long as BP or any other person or entity that is controlled by, controlling, or under
common control with BP, continues to be the owner of any land in the Increment Area, irrespective
Page 170 of 194
5
FG: 102705068.5
of any subdivision and sale by BP of other parcels of land in the Increment Area to other private
entities for the purpose of constructing new private developments in the Increment Area.
(d) The City will keep records for each tax collection year that show, on a cumulative basis,
the aggregate amount of shortfalls in tax allocation revenues related to the City’s annual debt
service payments on the portion of its outstanding LTGO bonds allocated to the financing of the
initial roadway improvements and on the additional LTGO bonds allocated to the financing of the
additional roadway improvements, respectively. The City also will keep records of the cumulative
amounts of BP’s and the PFD’s shortfall advances to the City with respect to debt service payments
on the additional LTGO bonds as well as the cumulative shortfalls in tax allocation revenues borne
by the City in relation to its debt service payments on outstanding LTGO bonds allocated to the
financing of the initial roadway improvements. If, for any tax collection year, tax allocation
revenues received by the City exceed the amount of debt service that was paid by the City in that
tax collection year, that excess amount of tax allocation revenues shall be applied by the City as
follows: first, the City shall reimburse the City for a like amount of all debt service payments on
the LTGO bonds previously paid from sources other than tax allocation revenues, such as other
available tax revenues or other lawfully available money of the City ; second, on February 15 of
the calendar year immediately following each applicable tax collection year, the City shall credit
a reimbursement amount (derived from that excess amount of tax allocation revenues) ratably
among the City, BP and the PFD to reduce or refund, as applicable, (i) the aggregate unreimbursed
amount of the City’s prior debt service payments made from other available tax revenues of the
City, (ii) the aggregate amount of BP’s shortfall advances not yet refunded from tax allocation
revenues, and (iii) the aggregate amount of the PFD’s shortfall advances not yet refunded from tax
allocation revenues; and, third, the City shall apply any remaining tax allocation revenues to any
purpose authorized by Ordinance No. 4618.
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the financial accommodations
provided by BP and the PFD to the City under the terms of this Agreement, including any shortfall
advances made by BP and the PFD to the City to fund any BP shortfall advance, are not intended
by the Parties to constitute, and shall not be treated as, a guarantee by BP or the PFD of payment
of the City’s debt service payments on the City’s LTGO bonds, or as a guarantee of the payment
of regular property taxes levied on new private developments constructed within the Increment
Area. BP and all other owners of taxable property in the Increment Area will be required to pay
annual property taxes on their taxable property in the Increment Area as generally provided by
Washington law. The purposes of the undertakings by BP and the PFD under this Agreement are,
first, to encourage the construction of new private developments within the Increment Area as
promptly as practicable, and, second, to assist the City to mitigate any temporary budgetary
impacts on the City that may result from the City’s use of funds other than tax allocation revenues
for the payment of debt service on its LTGO bonds issued to finance the roadway improvements
in the early years during the term of those bonds.
4. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall end (the “Termination”) on the
earlier of: (a) December 31st, 2049; or (b) on the date 30 days following the date of the City’s
Page 171 of 194
6
FG: 102705068.5
shortfall report provided to BP and the PFD showing that the respective total amounts of shortfall
advances made by BP and the PFD to the City have been refunded in full to BP and the PFD,
respectively. Upon Termination, the obligations of the Parties end, including the obligations of BP
and the PFD to make shortfall advances to the City and the obligation of the City to refund shortfall
advances previously made by BP and the PFD.
EXECUTED AND AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES as of the last date written below:
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
By ________________________
City Manager
Date: ______________________
BROADMOOR PROPERTIES, LLC
By ________________________
Managing Member
Date: ______________________
PASCO PUBLIC FACILITIES
DISTRICT
By ________________________
Executive Director
Date: ______________________
6/8/20246/8/2024
6/8/2024
Page 172 of 194
PROJECT
ESTIMATE City BP PFD City BP PFD
Eastbound ramp and roundabout - Full
buildout (see plan sheet)$11,500,000 100% 0% 0% $916,309 $0 $0
Signalized intersection - full buildout (see plan
sheet)$3,500,000 100% 0% 0% $278,877 $0 $0
Signalized intersection - full buildout (see plan
sheet) * involves ROW acquisition from third
party*
$4,800,000 100% 0% 0% $382,459 $0 $0
Roadway improvements full buildout: sidewalk
(north) pathway (south). Estimate includes
signal at Rd 103. Utilities are existing
$3,200,000 100% 0% 0% $254,973 $0 $0
Roadway improvements core road (curb &
drainage): Utilities are existing except catch
basins.
$2,700,000 0% 70% 30% $0 $150,593 $64,540
Roadway improvements core road (curb &
drainage): Estimate includes roundabout at
sandifur and Rd 108. Utilities are existing
except catch basins.
$4,500,000 0% 70% 30% $0 $250,989 $107,567
2 lanes of traffic and median. Curbs,
drainage, partial sidewalk (PFD Facility), no
signals or other intersection treatments.
Utilities are existing.
$3,300,000 0% 70% 30% $0 $184,059 $78,882
$33,500,000 $1,832,617 $585,641 $250,989
ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE
SCOPE
%
RESPONSIBILITY
EXHIBIT A
Pa
g
e
1
7
3
o
f
1
9
4
EXHIBIT B
Pa
g
e
1
7
4
o
f
1
9
4
1
FG: 102740705.1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT ON FUNDING AND CONSTRUCTION OF
BROADMOOR INCREMENT AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
This Supplemental Agreement on Funding and Construction of Broadmoor Increment Area
Roadway Improvements (this “Agreement”) is entered into by and between the City of Pasco,
Washington (the “City”), and Broadmoor Properties, LLC (“BP,” and, together with the City, the
‘Parties”) to provide for certain matters relating to the funding and construction of roadway
improvements within and serving the City’s Broadmoor Increment Area created by Ordinance No.
4618 of the City. The Parties agree as follows.
Part One. RECITALS
A. By the passage of Ordinance No. 4618, the City Council of the City created a tax increment
area designated as the Broadmoor Increment Area (the “Increment Area”) that became effective
on June 1, 2023, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 39.114 RCW (the “Act”).
B. The purpose of creating the Increment Area is to encourage new private developments
within the Increment Area that would not reasonably be expected to occur without the City’s
provision of certain public infrastructure improvements within and/or outside of and serving the
Increment Area.
C. These public infrastructure improvements serving the Increment Area include the roadway
improvements described in Exhibit A attached to this Agreement.
D. The City expects to finance the roadway improvements with the proceeds of not more than
$39.0 million of non-voted limited tax general obligation bonds (“LTGO bonds”) of the City as
authorized by the Act and other applicable law.
E. The City’s LTGO bonds used to finance roadway improvements will be issued as general
obligations of the City to which the City will pledge its full faith, credit and resources as well as
“tax allocation revenues” (as defined by the Act) expected to be received by the City from regular
property taxes levied on new private developments within the Increment Area.
F. The City intends and expects that tax allocation revenues received by the City from new
private developments within the Increment Area during the term of its LTGO bonds issued to
finance roadway improvements will be sufficient to pay or reimburse all of the City’s debt service
payments on those LTGO bonds, either directly from current tax allocation revenues received by
the City or by using later-received tax allocation revenues to reimburse the City for earlier debt
service payments that were required to be made from the City’s other available tax revenues or
other lawfully available money.
Page 175 of 194
2
FG: 102740705.1
G. BP is the current owner of the majority of the land included in the Increment Area. To
encourage and facilitate the financing and construction by the City of the roadway improvements
earlier than otherwise planned by the City, BP has agreed to enter into this Agreement to provide
certain financial accommodations to the City with respect to the City’s receipts of tax allocation
revenues needed to pay debt service payments on up to $5.5 million in principal amount of the
LTGO bonds required to finance the roadway improvements.
H. The financial accommodations to be provided by BP to the City pursuant to this Agreement
generally consist of the agreement by BP to advance funds to the City to reimburse the City for the
City’s debt service payments on that $5.5 million portion (the “BP supplemental portion”) of the
LTGO bonds made from the City’s other available tax revenues or other lawfully available money
(thereby mitigating budgetary impacts on the City’s general fund) as a result of a shortfall in tax
allocation revenues available for those debt service payments during the term of the City’s LTGO
bonds, with those shortfall advances made by BP to be refunded to BP from tax allocation revenues
received by the City in subsequent years when such collections, if any, are sufficient to be available
for such reimbursement purposes during the term of this Agreement.
I. The Parties agree that the actions to be taken by them pursuant to this Agreement are
intended to encourage the construction of new private developments within the Increment Area as
promptly as practicable so that the total amount of tax allocation revenues available to the City for
the payment of its LTGO bonds issued to finance the roadway improvements serving the Increment
Area will be timely received by the City in amounts sufficient to pay or reimburse, in full, the
City’s debt service payments on those bonds.
Part Two. AGREEMENT TERMS
1. City Financing and Construction of Broadmoor Roadway Improvements.
(a) Subject to the City’s determination that municipal bond market conditions are acceptable
to the City, the City will issue tax-exempt LTGO bonds in a maximum principal amount of up to
$39.0 million to finance the roadway improvements serving the Increment Area.
(b) BP will dedicate and convey to the City by statutory warranty deed, at no cost to the City,
all land and interests in land required by the City for construction of the roadway improvements.
(c) The City shall have full control over the design and construction of the roadway
improvements, including but not limited to decisions concerning the selection of contractors
pursuant to applicable public works laws and decisions concerning the cost of construction.
(d) The City will award bids for and manage the construction to completion of the roadway
improvements. The City will own, operate and maintain the roadway improvements; the roadway
Page 176 of 194
3
FG: 102740705.1
improvements shall be used for general public use; and BP shall not have any special legal
entitlements to use the roadway improvements.
2. SEPA and Other Conditions.
(a) This Agreement is subject to the compliance with applicable federal and state laws,
including prior compliance with applicable requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act
(“SEPA”). In particular, the City’s obligation to construct the roadway improvements is expressly
limited by completion of SEPA review through issuance of a threshold determination; the City’s
consideration of the SEPA review and its determination whether it is appropriate to proceed with
or without additional or revised conditions based on the SEPA review; and the resolution of any
challenges to construction of the roadway improvements in a manner reasonably acceptable to the
City.
(b) This Agreement is subject further to the City obtaining all required permits for construction
of the roadway improvements, and the receipt of responsible bids to construct the roadway
improvements serving the Increment Area at a cost that does not exceed the proceeds of the City’s
LTGO bonds available for that purpose.
3. Financial Accommodations to be Provided by BP to the City.
(a) If tax allocation revenues received by the City derived from regular property taxes on new
private developments within the Increment Area for any tax collection year are not sufficient to
pay 100% of the debt service that was due and payable on the City’s LTGO bonds issued for the
roadway improvements in that tax collection year, with the result that the City is required to use
and apply other available tax revenues to meet that shortfall in tax allocation revenues, then BP
will advance that shortfall amount to the City to the extent it is allocable to the debt service
payments on the BP supplemental portion of the LTGO bonds used to finance the roadway
improvements. For this purpose, a ratable portion of each maturity of the City’s outstanding LTGO
bonds issued to finance the roadway improvements serving the Increment Area will be allocated
to the BP supplemental portion of the LTGO bonds used to finance the roadway improvements.
(b) The City, by January 15 of the calendar year immediately following each applicable tax
collection year, will provide to BP a statement, based on reports and information received by the
City from the Franklin County Treasurer and the debt service payment schedule for the City’s
LTGO bonds issued for the roadway improvements (a “shortfall report”), showing (i) the total
amount of tax allocation revenues with respect to regular property taxes levied for the applicable
tax collection year received by the City in that tax collection year, (ii) the pro rata allocations of
those tax allocation revenues applied to debt service payments made on the BP supplemental
portion of the LTGO bonds and the other portions of the LTGO bonds allocable to the financing
of the roadway improvements, (iii) the respective shortfalls in tax allocation revenues related to
the debt service payments made on those respective portions of the LTGO bonds, and (iv)
calculations of the portion of the shortfall related to the debt service payments on the BP
Page 177 of 194
4
FG: 102740705.1
supplemental portion of the LTGO bonds required to be advanced by BP to the City (the “shortfall
advances”). By February 15 of the calendar year immediately following the applicable tax
collection year, BP will transfer its shortfall advance to the City.
(c) The obligations of BP to the City under this Agreement shall continue in full force and
effect for so long as BP or any other person or entity that is controlled by, controlling, or under
common control with BP, continues to be the owner of any land in the Increment Area, irrespective
of any subdivision and sale by BP of other parcels of land in the Increment Area to other private
entities for the purpose of constructing new private developments in the Increment Area.
(d) The City will keep records for each tax collection year that show, on a cumulative basis,
the aggregate amount of shortfalls in tax allocation revenues related to the City’s annual debt
service payments on the BP supplemental portion of its outstanding LTGO bonds issued to finance
the roadway improvements and the cumulative amounts of BP’s shortfall advances to the City with
respect to those debt service payments. If, for any tax collection year, tax allocation revenues
received by the City exceed the amount of debt service that was by the City paid in that tax
year, that excess amount of tax allocacollection tion revenues shall be by the City as applied
follows: first, the City shall reimburse the City for a like amount of all debt service payments on
the LTGO bonds previously paid from sources other than tax allocation revenues, such as other
available tax revenues or other lawfully available money of the City; second, on February 15 of
the calendar year immediately following each applicable tax collection year, the City shall credit
a reimbursement amount (derived from that excess amount of tax allocation revenues) ratably to
reduce or refund, as applicable, (i) the aggregate unreimbursed amount of the City’s prior debt
service payments on the LTGO bonds issued for the roadway improvements made from other
available tax revenues or other lawfully available money and not funded from any shortfall
advances made by BP under this Agreement or from shortfall advances made by BP and the Pasco
Public Facilities District (the “PFD”) under the Three-Party Agreement (defined below), (ii) the
respective aggregate amounts of BP’s and the PFD’s shortfall advances made under the Three-
Party Agreement not yet refunded from tax allocation revenues, and (iii) the aggregate amount of
BP’s shortfall advances under this Agreement with respect to debt service payments on the BP
supplemental portion not yet refunded from tax allocation revenues; and third, the City shall apply
any remaining tax allocation revenues to any purpose authorized by Ordinance No. 4618.
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the financial accommodations
provided by BP to the City under the terms of this Agreement, including any shortfall advances
made by BP to the City are not intended by the Parties to constitute, and shall not be treated as, a
guarantee by BP of payment of the City’s debt service payments on the City’s LTGO bonds, or as
a guarantee of the payment of regular property taxes levied on new private developments
constructed within the Increment Area. BP and all other owners of taxable property in the
Area will be required Increment to pay annual property taxes on their taxable property in the
Increment Area as generally provided by Washington law. The purposes of the undertaking by BP
under this Agreement are, first, to encourage the construction of new private developments within
the Increment Area as promptly as practicable, and, second, to assist the City to mitigate any
Page 178 of 194
5
FG: 102740705.1
temporary budgetary impacts on the City that may result from the City’s use of funds other than
tax allocation revenues for the payment of debt service on its LTGO bonds issued to finance the
roadway improvements in the early years during the term of those bonds.
4. Agreement Supplemental. This Agreement is intended by the City and BP only to
supplement, and not to alter or amend, their respective responsibilities under that certain
Agreement on Funding and Construction of Broadmoor Increment Area Roadway Improvements
entered into on June 8, 2024, by the City, BP and the Pasco Public Facilities District (the “Three-
Party Agreement”) by making the provisions herein for BP’s undertaking to provide the additional
financial accommodations to the City with respect to the $5.5 million BP supplemental portion of
the City’s LTGO bonds to be issued to finance the roadway improvements serving the Increment
Area.
5. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall end (the “Termination”) on the
earlier of: (a) December 31, 2049; or (b) on the date 30 days following the date of the City’s
shortfall report provided to BP showing that the total amount of shortfall advances made by BP to
the City have been refunded in full to BP. Upon Termination, the obligations of the Parties end,
including the obligations of BP to make shortfall advances to the City and the obligation of the
City to refund shortfall advances previously made by BP.
EXECUTED AND AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES as of the last date written below:
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
By ________________________
City Manager
Date: ______________________
BROADMOOR PROPERTIES, LLC
By ________________________
Managing Member
Date: ______________________
6/11/20246/12/2024
Page 179 of 194
#PROJECT
PROJECT
ESTIMATE City BP PFD City BP PFD
8
Additional Public Roadway/Utilities
Improvement TBD $5,500,000 0% 100% 0% $0 $438,235 $0
ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE
SCOPE
%
RESPONSIBILITY
EXHIBIT A
Pa
g
e
1
8
0
o
f
1
9
4
1
TO: Mayor, Charles Grimm
Members of the City Council
FROM: Harold Stewart, City Manager
DATE: July 20, 2026
City Manager:
Held first ever Employee of the Year Nominee luncheon. While the Employees of the Year get
recognized, and will be recognized at the Annual Employee Picinic in August, it is also important
to recognize the important work of the others who were nominated.
While the Department Heads will provide updates specific to their responsibilities here are several
priorities the on in addition taking office being worked to Manager the City identified by since
regular day to day operational duties (Changes/updates from the last report are highlighted in
red):
1. Broadmoor Development- Meetings are ongoing discussing developer interest,
progress, and potential City partnership. Agreements are being negotiated. First
agreement with Visconsi was presented at the July 6th Council meeting and is on the July
20th agenda for Council action.
2. HAPO Center- Lease expired after December 2025. County and City discussing future,
roles and partnership going forward. Lease extension has been provided to the County.
On March 3rd the CMO office received a letter from the County Administrator and a check
for $1 buying out the City’s interest in the HAPO Center as per the ILA and asserting full
control of the Center. Staff is working with legal to assess the legality of the action and any
potential recourses. Have received a response from the City’s representation and will
discuss further with Council in the near future.
3. Animal Shelter- Serves the entire Tri-Cities. Cost sharing between the three jurisdictions
needs re-evaluated and agreed upon. In addition, some issues have arisen with the old
facility that will require significant investment to repair. Staff is preparing and identifying
the anticipated needs and associated costs to discuss with Council in the near future. A
deeper conversation amongst the Tri-Cities city managers has begun regarding the needs
and structure of the Shelter going forward.
4. Hiring of Police Chief-Public Announcement was made at the July 13th Council Work
Session.
5. Hiring of IT Director – The first recruitment was not successful and the position will be
recruited again.
6. FY 27/28 Budget-Staff is preparing budget estimates and needs. Deadline for internal
submittal was May 28th. City Manager’s office is preparing to have a discussion with
Council regarding a in July projects, pressures, budget picture perspective of and big
needs and to receive Council priorities for budget consideration. The plan was to have a
Page 181 of 194
2
facilitator for the meeting and beginning the development of a Strategic Plan, however, the
costs were higher than expected. Costs of a Strategic Plan will be discussed/considered
as part of the upcoming budget process. City Manager is anticipating scheduling a
retreat/prioritization session in August.
7. Public Dollars for Public Benefit- This item was tabled by Council until January 2027.
8. Employee Survey – Survey is open for employee participation.
9. Essential Public Facilities and LRAs- Staff is preparing an extension of the moratorium
and the other directions from Council for action.
10. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)/Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) - The
City of Pasco scheduled two public engagement meetings to gather community input on
updates to CIP and TIP. The first meeting was held on April 8 at City Hall, with both virtual
and in-person attendance options available. The second opportunity for community
members to participate in-person was held on April 14 at Rey Reynolds Middle School.
Staff are in the process of preparing CIP, with presentation to Council planned for month
of August and adoption in September.
11. Crash Prevention Zone - Discussion and direction took place at the July 6th Council
meeting. The approved letter, signed by the mayor has been provided to DOT and a
meeting has been scheduled for the last week of July with to coordinate next steps.
12. Joint Council & Legislative Entity Meetings - During a recent council meeting, there
was discussion around coordinating joint Council and legislative entity meetings with key
local partners. Council provided potential entities for these meetings to bring up for
consideration. These meetings are intended to help strengthen relationships, align on
shared priorities, and support Council’s goals and objectives moving forward. Staff is
requesting direction from Council on which entities to proceed coordinating annual
meetings and to work alongside to build a collaborative agenda.
a. Pasco Chamber
b. Pasco School District Board
c. Franklin County
d. Port of Pasco
e. Mid-Columbia Libraries Board
f. Union Gospel Mission (UGM), Clean Sweep, & U-Turn for Christ
g. LBA
h. Visit Tri-Cities
i. Tri-City Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
j. Downtown Business Roundtable
k. Public Health District
A joint meeting with the Pasco Chamber was held June 23rd. Staff is preparing joint meetings with
the other entities identified above.
Meetings attended since the last report: Communication meetings with the Mayor, Mayor Pro
Tem, and Council all members; Compass; meeting with United Way; meeting with CREATE
meeting; and many other internal communication and project meetings.
Legal Matters:
Below is a summary of the litigation matters currently pending against the City of Pasco.
1. Inosensio Buenaventura v. City of Pasco Police Department & City of Pasco Employee
Counsel: Micheal J Throgmorton
Page 182 of 194
3
Current Status: Order dismissing the case has been granted with prejudice.
• September 2025: The Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint against a City of Pasco
employee and the City of Pasco Police Department, seeking monetary damages related
to an alleges stop. traffic 2020, 25, April The Plaintiff and Fourth their violations of
Fourteenth Amendment rights.
• December 2025: The Court issued an Order Granting Opportunity to Amend Complaint
after finding that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
• February 12, 2026: The Court granted the Plaintiff’s second Motion for Extension of Time
to Amend the Complaint, extending the deadline to February 27, 2026.
• February 27, 2026: The Plaintiff filed a Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel.
• request and Bono Counsel Pro for the Plaintiff’s denied The Court 2026: 10, March
dismissed the claims against the City of Pasco Police Department contained in the First
Amended Complaint. The Court Clerk was also directed to issue a Summons, Notice of
Lawsuit, and Request for Waiver of Service to the City of Pasco employee named in the
lawsuit.
• April 8th, 2026: The City filed a Motion to Dismiss, arguing that the claims are barred by
the threeapplicable -to fails otherwise complaint the that of limitations statute year and
state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
• June 18th, 2026: Motion to dismiss was granted with prejudice. The plaintiff has 30 days
to file an appeal to the Ninth Circuit.
2. Dave Swisher & Farm 2005 LLC v. City of Pasco
Counsel: Adam Rosenberg & Bob Sterbank
Lawsuit & Appeal: Land Use Petition act Challenge
Current Status: Appeal filed with Division III of the Court of Appeals
• April 2025: The City of Pasco became aware of a lawsuit filed by the Plaintiffs challenging
the Hearing Examiner’s approval of the Madison Park North Preliminary Plat. The matter
was filed of conditions contesting appeal (LUPA) several Petition Use Land a as Act
approval imposed by the Hearing Examiner, including:
o Condition 3 – LID ‘No Protest’ Condition: The Hearing Examiner required the Plat
to include a statement waiving future protests to the formation of a road or utility
LID
o 17 Condition – Condition: parks, of collection Required Credit Fee Impact No
transportation and school impact fees at the then-applicable rates. It also specified
that a credit against TIFs was not required, based on related Findings of Facts and
Conclusions of Law determining that the required improvements to Road 52, Burns
Road and Deseret Drive was no “system improvements” as that term is defined in
state statute, and therefore no credit against impact fees was required.
o Condition 19 – Street Improvement Condition: Required the plaintiff t to “ensure
that PMC with accordance in constructed alignments designed are road all and
21.15.030(1) and (2), and the City’s codes and standards in relationship to
adjoining plats and their streets.
o Condition 21 – School Zone Warning Signs Condition - Required the plaintiff to
install school zone advance warning beacons, and Rectangular Rapid Flashing
Page 183 of 194
4
Beacons at the crosswalk leading to the Rosalind Franklin STEM Elementary
School.
• December 2025: The Court conducted the hearing on the LUPA petition.
• Examiner’s Hearing the affirming order an largely Court The 2026: January issued
decision and dismissing the LUPA petition on all but one issue. The Court ruled in favor of
the Burns 52 Road and Road the regarding finding 17, No. Condition Plaintiff that
i As the result, a improvements.” of City larger constituted part mprovements “system
Plaintiff was determined to be entitled to credit against Transportation Impact Fees for the
costs associated with those roadway improvements.
• March 2026: The Plaintiff appealed the Superior Court’s decision to Division III of the
Washington State Court of Appeals.
Lawsuit: Complaint Damages
Current Status: Pending, awaiting resolution of the LUPA matter
• April 2025: Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the City of Pasco alleging damages resulting
from what they characterize as arbitrary, capricious, and unlawful agency actions related
to permitting decisions and processing delays associated with the Madison Park North
preliminary plat application.
• May 2025: The lawsuit was removed to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Washington.
3. Corey Bitton, Tamara Bitton, Great Basin Land Co. LLC & Spritz, Inc v. City of Pasco
and multiple City Employees
Counsel: Quinn Plant
Current Status: Pending
• alleging Plaintiffs the by filed lawsuit a became aware City The 2025: December of
arbitrary enforcement of the Pasco Municipal Code, failure to recognize vested permits,
and the absence of constitutionally adequate appeal procedures.
• February 2026: The City filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Plaintiffs
subsequently filed motions seeking leave to exceed the applicable page limits and to
expedite the hearing schedule. The City opposed both motions.
• March 2026: The Court granted the Plaintiffs’ motions for excess pages and for an
expedited hearing.
• April 2026: The Court issued a scheduling order governing the progression of the case.
4. Lewis Place, LLC v. City of Pasco
Counsel: Ogden, Murphey & Wallace PLLC
Current Status: Lawsuit filed, preliminary hearing scheduled for July 1, 2026
• June 2026: The City of Pasco was made aware of a lawsuit filed by the plaintiffs
stemming from the City’s hearing examiner’s land use decision granting a special use
permit for the construction of an RV park at 434 E Lewis Place. This lawsuit involves a
Page 184 of 194
5
Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) challenge to the Hearing Examiner’s conditions of
approval. The conditions that the plaintiff was arguing against were:
o Condition 1 – Site Plan Compliance Condition: Required the applicant to submit a
revised site plan prior to construction permit issuance demonstrating full
compliance with PMC 25.160, including RV spacing requirements, open space,
landscaping and buffering standards, dimensional requirements for RV spaces,
and all supporting measurements and calculations. Failure to demonstrate
compliance could result in permit denial.
o Condition 2 – Internal Circulation Plan Condition: Required the applicant to
submit a revised internal circulation plan prior to construction permit issuance
demonstrating safe and functional vehicle movement throughout the site,
including compliant traffic circulation, elimination or mitigation of backing
movements in one-way drive aisles, and clear identification of travel directions,
turning movements, and access points. Additional Special Use Permit review
could be required if circulation standards could not be met.
o Condition 5 – RV Spacing Verification Condition: Required the applicant to
demonstrate compliance with PMC 25.160.070(2) and minimum RV separation
standards, including 15 feet side-to-side and 12 feet end-to-end spacing between
recreational vehicle units, prior to civil plan approval.
o Condition 7 – RV Site Density Reduction Condition: Required the applicant to
modify the site layout and reduce the total number of RV spaces as necessary to
achieve compliance with PMC 25.160 standards related to spacing, open space,
and internal circulation.
o Condition 8 – Vehicle Turning Movement Condition: Required the applicant to
provide turning movement diagrams demonstrating adequate circulation for
recreational vehicles and emergency vehicles, subject to review and approval by
the City Engineer and Fire Department.
o Condition 9 – Sight Distance Compliance Condition: Required the applicant to
ensure that sight distance at the site entrance complied with PMC 25.160.070(3)
by adjusting signage, fencing, landscaping, or other site features as necessary to
maintain unobstructed visibility.
o Condition 16 – Fire Hydrant Installation Condition: Required installation of a
minimum of three internal fire hydrants along internal roadways at locations
approved by the Fire Department, unless the Fire Marshal determined in writing
that fewer hydrants were sufficient and permitted under the Pasco Municipal
Code.
o Condition 24 – Internal Roadway Design Condition: Required the applicant to
revise the internal roadway system to comply with PMC 25.160.070(5), limiting
one-way roads to areas with drive-through RV spaces and requiring compliant
two-way circulation or alternative access where drive-through spaces were not
provided.
Human Resources Director, Sara Matzen
City of Pasco – Monthly HR Council Report
Reporting Month: June 2026
1. Headcount vs. Budgeted Positions
• Active Headcount: 451
Page 185 of 194
6
• Budgeted Positions: 510.35
• Variance: -59.35
2. Recruitment Activity
• Open Positions (as of month-end): 21
• Positions Filled This Month: 13
• Critical/Hard to Fill positions
o Senior Engineer: Related experience for the role – specific engineering license.
Involving staffing agency for assistance. The role is reposted on our careers page
and external job boards. We have one candidate scheduled to start 7/20;
currently have 1 additional vacancy.
o Senior Traffic Engineer: Position is looking for specific license & exp. with traffic
design that is hard to find. Involved staffing agency for assistance, the role is
reposted on our careers page and external job boards. Conducting compensation
analysis to consider a wage increase.
3. Medical/Rx Plan Cost – Trends & Budget to Actual
• YTD (Budget vs. Actual): $4,830,990 vs $4,385,794
• % of Budget Used YTD: 91 %
4. Year to Date (YTD) Medical Claim Costs by Plan
5. Leave Counts (Aggregate Only and only those currently out on continuous or
intermittent)
• Protected Leave of Absence (PFML, FMLA)
o Intermittent Schedule: 14 Employees
o Continuous: 17 employees
• Workers’ Compensation: 2 employees
7. Worker Compensation Claims (for prior month)
• # of incidents: 1
• # of timeloss cases: 0
• Total YTD # of Cases: 27
8. Turnover Rate (YTD)
Page 186 of 194
7
• Voluntary: 2.91%
• Involuntary: 1.12%
• Total Turnover YTD: 5.38%
• Average Length of Service at separation: 4.5 years
9. Strategic Projects / Updates
• Provided Human Resources support to successfully staff the Aquatics Center for its June
opening.
• Coordinated and facilitated the Police Chief recruitment interview process.
• Continued collective bargaining negotiations with the IAFF Administrative bargaining unit
for its initial collective bargaining agreement.
• Coordinated and facilitated interviews for the IT Director recruitment.
Finance Director, Kevin Hebdon
Fiscal Year-End & Audit Readiness
SAO Engagement:
We have continued coordinating with the Washington State Auditor's Office (SAO) regarding the
Annual has SAO The audit. the upcoming (ACFR) Report Financial Comprehensive and
by we if that confirmed provide the ACFR July 20 they meet can remain confident , they
the September 30 federal deadline for the grant program review, which also requires completion
of the financial statement audit.
2027-2028 Budget Development
Budget Progress:
While our primary focus has been completing the ACFR, budget development continues to move
forward. both balance staff as continuing is work planned, than slower been has Progress but
priorities.
Labor Cost Modeling:
Payroll is currently completing the position budgeting module, which will calculate salaries for all
authorized positions, cost including step progression, -of- other and (COLA), living adjustments
anticipated compensation changes. Personnel costs represent approximately 80-85% of City
expenditures, making this a critical component of the budget process.
This have created new departments been particularly detailed as process year's has
organizational structures and general ledger accounts. Staff assignments are being aligned
minimize yearto budgeting the within correctly system -and adjustments end improve financial
reporting accuracy. We anticipate completing the 2027 base labor budget by July 16, followed by
compensation assumptions, targeted labor budget and review, data validation, with a draft
for July 24.
Revenue Forecast & Budget Outlook:
Concurrently, we are finalizing revenue forecasts and compiling departmental budget requests.
By July 24 high level projected including the picture, budget first to have expect we , gap the
between anticipated revenues and expenditures, providing the foundation for upcoming budget
discussions.
Page 187 of 194
8
Utility Billing
Staffing Update:
Mariano Rodriguez was successfully promoted to Utility Billing Specialist following the
reclassification of a lower-level position. As departmental processes have become more
streamlined, the need shifted toward higher-level technical responsibilities. Mariano is
progressing well in training and has been a valuable addition to the team.
Process Improvements:
We have eliminated the requirement for management staff to carry a wirelessly connected iPad
to respond to after-hours customer calls. Our contracted answering service now utilizes enhanced
decision trees and scripted guidance to resolve situations previously escalated to management.
This change has improved responsiveness to customer inquiries while significantly improving staff
morale and work-life balance.
Summer Water Shut-Off:
We are currently in the annual summer "hot months" period during which water service cannot be
disconnected for non-payment. Utility Billing staff continue proactive outreach to delinquent
customers, encouraging payment and establishing communication while complying with seasonal
shut-off restrictions through September.
Banking Improvements
Internal Controls:
As new staff members have joined the department, we have strengthened banking authorizations
and segregation of duties. These improvements enhance internal controls over payments, wire
transfers, ACH transactions, and other banking activities, further safeguarding public funds.
Operational Efficiencies:
We have implemented several new banking services through U.S. Bank that improve efficiency
while reducing administrative effort and cost.
• Accounts Payable Optimizer: This vendor payment platform manages payment
card credit virtual or preferences eligible for while identifying vendors ACH
payments. In addition to increasing payment efficiency, it extends the City's cash
float, allowing funds to remain invested longer and increasing interest earnings and
rebate opportunities.
• Payroll Direct Deposit Visa Cards: Employees who prefer not to provide personal
banking information—or who are unable to establish a traditional bank account—
will now have the option of receiving wages through a payroll debit card, effective
date yet to be established. We anticipate this program will be especially beneficial
for to our relationship and banking Due and seasonal temporary employees.
account analysis credits, this program will be provided at essentially no additional
cost to the City as is the case with all of these operational enhancements through
US Bank.
• Account Payroll Validation: banking employee new service validates This
information in real time, eliminating the need for pre-note files and first-payroll paper
checks. including New employee accounts can be verified almost immediately,
Page 188 of 194
9
routing information and account ownership, resulting in a faster, more secure
onboarding process.
Organizational Culture & Staffing Transitions
Finance Supervisor:
Joseph Mugo continues to grow into his Finance Supervisor role and is making steady progress.
Accounting Supervisor:
Christine Tudor has been an excellent addition to the department, providing strong leadership in
Payroll Melody transition created by Garcia's and Accounts Payable while supporting the
promotion. We also have a significant situation with a staff member out on intermittent leave that
requires Christine's attention in back filling these duties and responsibilities. A little bit of baptism
by fire for her.
Staff Accountants:
AJ Garza has assumed responsibility for Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) and Fixed Assets
and has Staff a into transitioned Garcia valuable contributions. make to continues Melody
Accountant role through an internal promotion, bringing her Accounts Payable experience into
her expanded responsibilities.
Beginning August 3, Suzie Benitez will return to the City as a Staff Accountant, a position she
previously held. We are excited to welcome her back to the team.
One Staff Accountant vacancy remains. We intend to evaluate operational needs and the overall
budget outlook before determining whether to fill that position.
Accounting Assistant Recruitment:
Christine and Julie are currently reviewing applications for the Accounting Assistant position
vacated by Melody Garcia. Interviews are scheduled for July 10.
Fiscal Impact:
Department restructuring and staffing transitions continue to track at little to no net budget impact.
Team Culture:
Overall team morale continues to strengthen as strive to fill positions, train new staff, and hope
for improved work life balance for all. We recently held a brief cornhole tournament during a staff
meeting, teamfor opportunity an enjoyable provided which building. ongoing Combined with
process improvements and the addition of new team members, the department continues to build
a positive and collaborative work environment.
we continued support your and appreciate Pasco as residents the to serve proud We are of
strengthen our financial operations, modernize our services, and build a high-performing Finance
Department.
Community & Economic Development Deputy Director, Craig Raymond
Pre first has held staff CED the - development the Visconsi to Application meeting related in
Broadmoor. A second applicant had a pre-app meeting scheduled but delayed it so they can finish
up some coordination with their team.
Page 189 of 194
10
Additional on the to have continued types permit be added to - are month New line portal. this
Commercial Plumbing and Mechanical Permits and Commercial Tenant Improvement Permits
will be added by end of next week. CED staff and I.T. continue to work with software vendors to
solve on-line payment problems
Code Enforcement Activity:
• Complaints received – 173
• Code cases opened – 116
Building Issues - 46
Dangerous buildings - 4
Fire hazards – 38
Public nuisance – 27
Zoning Issue - 1
• Code cases closed – 48
• Cases to be followed up on – 82
• Cases that went to Code Board – 0
• Voluntary Correction agreements issued – 1
• Backlogged Complaints pending verification – 33
• Total open cases - 947
• Counter/Hallway contacts – 116
• Phone calls received (ring central and cell phone) – 910
The Code Enforcement officers for the month of June have continued to focus on outreach
specifically for areas and properties with a high Fire Hazard. In order to focus on this and other
concerns temporary code officers were hired. The temp staff not only addressed Fire Hazards
with continuous follow up they have also been tasked with addressing unlicensed venders. Staff
are inspecting, validating, and uploading their own photos, opening cases, and verifying
compliance (with assistance). Staff have been working with property owners, one-on-one and
creating timelines for compliance based on level of complaints and severity. They are actively
monitoring for unlicensed vendors and have attained compliance with the vendors that they do
come in to contact with. Staff have received a large number of complaints for dust control,
unlicensed vendors, fire hazards, and homeless encampments
To address a few wins for Code Enforcement and the City of Pasco:
• 4110 W. Marie St was a known Hoarding house that has received dozens of complaints
over the years. CEO Mendoza worked with the family and recently gained compliance and
complements from neighbors.
• 7617 W. Court St. was found to have between 45 and 60 goats on there property in a
zone that allowed 2. CEO Gomez worked with the owner and slowly gained compliance
on June 30th.
• Staff successfully had an accumulated 26 acres of tall, dead and dry vegetation mowed
prior to July 4th. This does not include other properties that were also cleaned in
preparation of the Firework season.
Public Works Director, Maria Serra
July 2026 City Manager’s Report - Public Works Department
Page 190 of 194
11
1.Regional partnerships and upcoming advocacy opportunities
a . Transportation Legislative Tour organized by Good Roads Association
The Benton Franklin Walla Walla Good Roads Association (BFWGRA) is organizing a legislative
on transportation highest region's the of tour priorities August 19 biregular its followed by , -
monthly meeting. Public Works Director Maria Serra, who serves as Co-Chair of the BFWGRA
Legislative Committee, is working with Ben Franklin Transit to develop the approximately 3.5-hour
tour route.
The tour a at look firsthand with legislative and state legislators provide will candidates
transportation projects that are critical to supporting regional mobility, economic development, and
public safety. Featured projects include:
1. US Highway 12 – Phase 8
2. US 12 / "A" Street Crossing Improvements (City of Pasco)
3. SR 240 / I-182 / Aaron Drive Complete Streets Improvements
4. Columbia Center Boulevard Widening
5. US Highway 12 / Clinton Street Interchange
6. Road 76 Overpass (City of Pasco)
With two of the six featured projects located in Pasco, the tour provides an important opportunity
to City's significance, regional their the transportation priorities, and showcase highlight
strengthen relationships with state policymakers. By providing decision-makers with an on-the-
ground understanding of these projects, the City and its regional partners aim to build support for
future legislative and funding opportunities.
Due to limited project presenters, legislators and legislative will be given to seating, priority
candidates, and members of the BFWGRA Executive Board. Additional participants may be
accommodated as space allows.
b. Washington's Water Future: Tri-Cities Regional Roundtable attendance
Public Works leadership and City Manager’s office have been invited to participate in a regional
roundtable discussing Washington’s Water Future tentatively scheduled for August 3. Attendance
is via invitation only.
Washington’s Water Future is a new statewide initiative led by Governor Bob Ferguson and the
Washington growing water State Department of Ecology to help Washington prepare for
challenges. This summer, Ecology is hosting regional and sector-based roundtables with Tribal
governments, en utilities, industries, agricultural governments, local groups, vironmental
together bringing By Washington. community groups and organizations, many across different
voices, Ecology is hoping to build a shared understanding of the current and future challenges,
interests, needs, and solutions. These conversations can help identify a range of potential future
policy, planning, and on-the-ground actions to respond to impacts of climate change on our water
and safeguard ample and clean water for today and for the future (Washington’s Water Future
webpage).
c. Strategic partnership with Benton Franklin Council of Governments (BFCOG)
Public Works, Community and Economic Development and City Manager’s office will participate
in a workshop with Benton Franklin Council of Governments (BFCOG) on August 10. This
Page 191 of 194
12
meeting is an opportunity for key staff from BFCOG and the City of Pasco to share strategic
priorities and discuss opportunities for collaboration over the next 12 months.
BFCOG serves as the region’s metropolitan planning organization and plays a key role in
coordinating transportation planning, administering certain federal transportation funding
programs, supporting regional legislative and policy discussions, and facilitating collaboration
among local jurisdictions.
BFCOG will be meeting individually with member jurisdictions in order to fully plan upcoming work
which will be essential to regional and local transportation funding.
2. Water and Sewer: 2026 Mid-Year System Performance
Water System
Pasco's water system continues to meet increasing demand as the community grows:
• Produced 2.45 billion gallons of drinking water in the first half of 2026, an 8% increase
from last year in the same period.
• The West Pasco Water Treatment Plant more than doubled production after the
expanded facility became operational late last year, improving both system reliability and
operational efficiency.
• Responded to 45 after-hours water emergencies and 26 after-hours irrigation calls.
• Completed 34 new water service connections and responded to 1,774 utility locate
requests.
Sewer System
The City's wastewater system continues to perform reliably while accommodating growth.
• The 9th & Washington Lift Station, which conveys about 75% of the City's wastewater, is
projected to handle 1.6 billion gallons this year, up from 1.4 billion gallons in 2025.
• The Maitland Lift Station continues to operate with gradual increase of flows as
development in eastern Pasco and the LID No. 152 areas continue developing.
Page 192 of 194
Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and
appropriate investment and re- investment in community
infrastructure.
City Council Goals
QUALITY OF LIFE
2024-2025
Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services
and programs.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system.
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Implement targeted strategies to reduce crime through strategic
investments in infrastructure, staffing, and equipment.
COMMUNITY SAFETY
Promote and encourage economic vitality.
ECONOMIC VITALITY
Identify opportunities to enhance City of Pasco identity, cohesion,
and image.
CITY IDENTITY
Page 193 of 194
METAS DEL CONCEJO MUNICIPAL
2024-2025
Promover una alta calidad de vida a través de programas, servicios
y inversion apropiada y reinversión en la comunidad infraestructura
comunitaria.
CALIDAD DE VIDA
Promover viabilidad financiera a largo plazo, valor, y niveles de
calidad de los servicios y programas.
SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA
Promover un sistema de transporte multimodal altamente funcional.
RED DE TRANSPORTE DE LA COMUNIDAD
Implementar estrategias específicas para reducir la delincuencia por
medios de inversiones estratégicas en infraestructura, personal y equipo.
SEGURIDAD DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD
Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica.
VITALIDAD ECONOMICA
Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la
cohesión, y la imagen.
IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA
Page 194 of 194