Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2026.04.27 Council Workshop Packet
AGENDA City Council Workshop Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, April 27, 2026 Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar Page 1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment) to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this workshop. The Pasco City Council Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco. To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-332-249-0718 and use access code 173 686 691#. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Servicio de intéprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos dias antes para garantizar la disponiblidad. (Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.) 2. CALL TO ORDER 3. ROLL CALL (a) Pledge of Allegiance 4. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS 5. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT – the public may comment on each topic scheduled for discussion, up to 2 minutes per person with a total of 8 minutes per item. If Page 1 of 266 opposing sides wish to speak, then both sides receive an equal amount of time to speak or up to 4 minutes each side. 4 - 18 (a) Peanuts Park North - Conceptual Design Presentation (10 minute presentation) Jeff Stiltz with Michael Terrell - Landscape Architects, LLC - to present 19 - 38 (b) Park Bathroom Security Enhancement Options (10 minute staff presenation) 39 - 67 (c) Downtown Light & Activation Plan (Alleyways) (10 minute staff presentation) 68 - 96 (d) Commercial Land Capacity Review (5 minute staff presentation) 97 - 119 (e) Q - Ordinance - Introduction of Quasi Judicial Item - Amending the Zoning Classification of certain real property located north of Wrigley Dr., south of Sandifur Pkwy., west of Road 68 and east Road 76, in Pasco, Franklin County, Washington from C-1 (Retail Business) and R-4 (High Density Residential) to MU (Mixed Use)(Z2026-001) (5 minute staff presentation) 120 - 143 (f) Q - Ordinance - Introduction of Quasi Judicial Item - Amending the Zoning Classification of certain real property located north of E Spokane Dr., south of E Salt Lake St., west of N Oregon Ave., east BNSF Railroad, in Pasco, Franklin County, Washington from C-3 (General Business) to I-1 (Light Industrial)(Z2026-002) (5 minute staff presentation) 144 - 166 (g) Q - Ordinance - Introduction of Quasi Judicial Item - Ordinance for Elite Investment Group, LLC Rezone from R-4 and C-1 to MU (Z2026-003) (5 minute staff presentation) 167 - 193 (h) Resolution and Ordinance - Authorizing acceptance of grant funding and execution of a grant agreement with the Washington State Department of Commerce, Office of Crime Victims Advocacy and Amending 2025–2026 Operating Budget (5 min staff presentation) 194 - 228 (i) Resolution - Interlocal Agreement with Franklin County for Jail Services (5 minute staff presentation) 229 - 236 (j) Resolution - Amendment to Fire Department Facility Use Agreement (5 minute staff presentation) Page 2 of 266 237 - 245 (k) Resolution - Termination of ILA between the City of Pasco and Walla Walla County Fire Protection District 5 for Advanced Life Support Services (5 minute staff presentation) 246 - 264 (l) Resolution - Amendment to Interlocal Agreement between City of Pasco and Franklin County Fire District No. 3 Concerning the Exchange of Services and the Transfer of Assets Due to the Annexation of the Road 80 Area to the City (5 minute staff presentation) 6. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION 8. ADJOURNMENT 9. ADDITIONAL NOTES 265 - 266 (a) Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only) Page 3 of 266 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 25, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/27/26 FROM: Angela Pashon, Director Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Peanuts Park North - Conceptual Design Presentation (10 minute presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Jeff Stiltz with Michael Terrell - Landscape Architects, LLC - to present (10 min) final concept plan for Peanuts Park North. III. FISCAL IMPACT: $38,680 contract with MT-LA for Peanuts Park North concept development and design; once 30% design is completed this is reimbursable through State legislative funding. Total cost of project will be determined by final concept and design. Funding is not identified for completion of this project at this time. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background: Project & City Efforts Peanuts Park is divided by Lewis Street in Downtown Pasco. The south portion of the park completed renovations in 2021. With the south portion of the Peanuts Park project complete in 2021, along with the Farmer's Market, the project was removed from the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Improvements to Peanuts Park North improvements have long been a part of the City's overall plan for downtown and are recommended to remain in the CIP, accordingly, Peanuts Park North was added back in as a stand-alone project. The project was added at the anticipated cost of $500k; this cost estimate is outdated and will be updated in the 2027 CIP. Page 4 of 266 In 2024, trees and shrubs were removed in Peanuts Park North to help diminish undesired activity. Funding & Design The City Council added funding for the project to their 2023 Legislative Priorities and the City was awarded $150,000 Legislative Appropriation Grant approval through Dept of Commerce for project. To access funding a final conceptual plan, 30% final design, and budget are required to be eligible to receive the funding. In February 2025, the City issued a RFP for consultants for concept development and design of the renovation; MT-LA was selected. Between April-June 2025, MT-LA conducted two outreach events which consultant/staff the 2025, July In preferred three in resulted options. recommended option was reviewed with Parks & Recreation staff and Police Department to address safety and desired outcomes of the concept. The three options, and recommended option, were presented to City Council on October 27, 2025, and the following were highlighted in discussion: Importance of lighting; this is included in final concept design. Concern on including trees; final concept design is proposing minimal (2) narrow trees based on public feedback. Evaluation of adding bathroom facility; in further evaluation, due to the size of the area adding a restroom would impact the amenities and create challenges of a a structure blocking sightlines, creating possible hiding spots. Council desired another outreach opportunity be conducted and Parks & Recreation Advisory Board review of final concept; both of these actions were completed in November 2025. Changes from last Council presentation The north portion is proposed as an all-purpose flex space instead of specific to sporting court. This provides for greater flexibility/usage for rentals. Impacts: Renovation, specifically replacing existing concrete, of Peanuts Park North will improve safety and matching the prior renovation will create greater sense of place in downtown Pasco while promoting positive community behavior. V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation: Staff recommends acceptance of the draft final concept as presented. Page 5 of 266 Constraints: The Legislative Appropriations grant was originally set to expire on July 1, 2025. It has been extended through July 1, 2027, giving us until this date to expend the funds. Extension beyond this date is possible but not guaranteed. Next Steps: Staff is seeking Council acceptance of the draft final concept so that MT-LA can complete the design and it can be used for future funding and planning steps and eventual construction documents to take to bid once funds are allocated/secured. The design will be developed to allow for the park to be constructed in phases with initial phase including: utilities, flatwork, stormwater, and fencing. Alternatives: Provide feedback and ask for draft plan to be updated based on feedback. Depending on the extent of the changes, this could lead to the need for a change order with the contract design consultant, MT-LA. Do not complete design process at this time and terminate the design contract. This could potentially delay or lead to the loss of the grant funds. Page 6 of 266 Peanuts Park – North City Council Update April 27, 2026 Michael Terrell-Landscape Architecture, PLLC Meier Architecture - Engineering Pa g e 7 o f 2 6 6 Overview Peanuts Park – dedicated in honor of Noburu “Peanuts” Fukuda - 1977 Peanuts Park South Redesign and Construction – 2022 Downtown Pasco Master Plan - 2023 Schedule: March 2025 - Project Kickoff with Pasco Parks & Recreation May 3, 2025 - Public Outreach #1: Cinco de Mayo Celebration June 17, 2025 - Public Outreach #2: Concepts Presentation July 2025 - Preferred Option Developed for Parks & Recreation and Police Department Review October 23, 2025 - Presentation to City Council November 2025: Final Concept Specific Survey & Community Meeting April 27, 2026 – Update Presentation to City Council Preliminary/Phase I Construction Design: 2026 Construction: As funds become available Pa g e 8 o f 2 6 6 Background GOAL: Active and Safe Streets and Public Places for All STRATEGY: Develop a programming plan for streets and public places ACTION: Peanuts Park North Design and Development DESCRIPTION: Some elements considered for the Peanuts Park renovation in 2022, such as the spray park, did not go forward, and could be incorporated into improvements on the north side. Other potential improvements include an outdoor public art gallery, murals, lighting, seating, landscaping, and other programming. Public space acts as additional take-out dining space for small food/drink retailers that don't have much dine-in space. GOAL: A Downtown that reflects Pasco's history, people, landscape, and culture STRATEGY: Establish a public mural and public art program DESCRIPTION: Many attractive downtowns have successful public art and mural programs showcasing local artists. Public art can be a significant attractor to Downtown Pasco and should include interactive elements that allow for participation from the community and visitors. Pa g e 9 o f 2 6 6 Background W Lewis St Peanuts Park Peanuts Park North S 4 th A v e S 3 rd A v e Flower Shop PPD Downtown Area Station Tri-City UGM Offices Pa g e 1 0 o f 2 6 6 CONCEPTS DEVELOPED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT CONCEPT A: EXISTING PEANUTS PARK SYNERGY AND PLAZA FLEX SPACE Votes from Public Outreach #1: 2 votes Votes from Public Outreach #2: 2 Votes CONCEPT B: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND RECREATION FLEX SPACE Votes from Public Outreach #1: 6 votes Votes from Public Outreach #2: 2 Votes CONCEPT C: ART WALK AND SOCIAL ACTIVITY Votes from Public Outreach #1: 30 votes (votes were tallied with the programming board that listed recreation opportunity which may have resulted in higher voting) Votes from Public Outreach #2: 2 Votes Pa g e 1 1 o f 2 6 6 PREFERRED CONCEPT Main Programming: Design synergy with existing Peanuts Park Creates plaza space fronting Lewis St Design incorporates area for temporary sport recreation or event activities Art walk/Mural Opportunities Outdoor seating opportunity for possible future food restaurants Fencing for security Removable Shading Pa g e 1 2 o f 2 6 6 PREFERRED CONCEPT (NORTH) Other Programming: Access control for businesses from north parking lot Internal fence separation between uses Area for surface play Location for social Activities Planter areas with native plants and lawn flex area Pa g e 1 3 o f 2 6 6 PREFERRED CONCEPT (NORTH) PROGRAMMING EXAMPLES Social events Programming Opportunities Food events Recreation events Kids and arts events Pa g e 1 4 o f 2 6 6 PREFERRED CONCEPT (SOUTH) Other Programming: Small stage for performances Public Art Locations Flex Seating Plaza Access gate, ~24 wide sliding gate. Identical gateway features/similar concrete & Planter Design, tying together both sides of Peanuts Park Pa g e 1 5 o f 2 6 6 PREFERRED CONCEPT (SOUTH) PROGRAMMING EXAMPLES Giant Games Physically active games Surface Play Social Activities/Programming: Outdoor flex seating Second “Stage” Opportunity Flex Hardscape Space Pa g e 1 6 o f 2 6 6 PROGRAMMING EXAMPLES Art Walk Examples: Sculptures Landscape/shade mimicry Community engagement mural Mural Examples: Sculptures: Flowers History mural Pa g e 1 7 o f 2 6 6 Questions?Pa g e 1 8 o f 2 6 6 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 23, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/27/26 FROM: Angela Pashon, Director Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Park Bathroom Security Enhancement Options (10 minute staff presenation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Council discussion and direction on park bathroom security strategies, desired service budget current given parameters acceptable and levels, fiscal constraints. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Cost for options presented range from $1,000 (per door) keypad lock conversion to $500k for seasonal security staffing at four locations. Absent new funding, implementation would require: Reduction of park service levels elsewhere Deferral of maintenance projects Increased reliance on seasonal closures Reallocation from other departments IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background The City maintains 28 parks, including 7 permanent restroom facilities that operate seasonally from April through October, generally between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Facilities are secured through automated locking systems and supplemented by portable toilets during the off-season and after hours. Restrooms are cleaned daily by seasonal staff, with additional visits as time allows. Despite these efforts, staff continue to experience recurring issues, including: Page 19 of 266 Graffiti and vandalism Broken fixtures and stolen equipment Fires and plumbing damage Drug use and loitering Overnight camping Human waste contamination beyond normal use Higher-incident parks include: Volunteer Sylvester Memorial Schlagel These issues result in: Restroom closures impacting families and programmed events Increased labor and repair costs Community and staff exposure to hazardous conditions Replacement with portable toilets (which are also vandalized) V. DISCUSSION: Discussion Due to ongoing restroom-related issues affecting both park users and City resources, staff have evaluated a range of strategies intended to reduce misuse, limit damage, and improve overall facility availability. Evaluation efforts focused on the four highest-incident parks; however, options presented could be expanded or adapted to other locations. The options outlined vary in cost, level of deterrence, operational complexity, and mutually not are options These on or staffing reliance technology. exclusive and may be combined to create a layered approach depending on Council direction and available funding. Expectation Setting It is important to note that no single strategy will fully eliminate vandalism, misuse, or illegal activity. Restroom closures will still occur in response to significant damage or unsafe conditions. The intent of the options presented is to: Reduce the frequency and severity of incidents Improve response capabilities Increase the overall availability of restroom facilities for the community Page 20 of 266 Options that rely on monitoring technologies may primarily support post- incident investigation, while staffing-based solutions provide real-time deterrence and response. Police response will continue to be prioritized based on overall call volume and may not be immediate for all incidents. Options for Consideration open remain bathrooms park seasonally presented options The assume (retrofitting would be necessary to expand) and hours of operation remain unchanged. 1. Closure Checks a. Utilize security service to check bathrooms at closing time to ensure there are no occupants and doors are secured. Currently used at Chiawana Park. i. Cost: $10 per location, per check. 1. All bathrooms = $70 daily; $15k for season 2. 5 bathrooms (4 + Chiawana) = $50 daily; $10,650 for season ii. Pros: Limits damage overnight by clearing bathrooms and ensuring doors are not propped open. iii. Cons: Does not cover hours bathrooms are open. 2. Security Services (Enforcement - No Cleaning) a. One security guard at each of the 4 bathrooms during open hours. i. Cost: $62k monthly; $434k for season. ii. Pros: Trained security presence, ability to monitor both inside and out. iii. Cons: No cleaning service. b. Two security guards rotating between 2 bathrooms during open hours. i. Cost: $26,256 monthly; $184k for season. ii. Pros: Trained security presence, ability to monitor both inside and out. iii. Cons: Bathrooms left unsupervised during the rotation and overnight. No Cleaning. 3. Temporary Staffing Services (Presence & Cleaning) The City currently uses temporary staff to rotate between parks to clean bathrooms by expanded be could during season. open Services increasing the number of temporary staff used and assigning a single individual to a park or to multiple parks. a. Temp staff at each bathroom during open hours i. Costs: $71,500 monthly; $500k for season. ii. Pros: Provides both presence and continuous cleaning Page 21 of 266 service. Monitor both inside and out. Currently spend $1k weekly on bathroom cleaning by temporary staff, this would be offset by expanded services. iii. Cons: Costly. Expanded use of City vehicles by temporary staff. Simple presence, not trained in patrol. b. Temp staff rotating between bathrooms i. Cost: $35,750 monthly; $250k for season. ii. Pros: Provides both presence and continuous cleaning service. Monitor both inside and out. Currently spend $1k weekly this staff, temporary by cleaning bathroom on would be offset by expanded services. iii. Cons: Expanded use of City vehicles by temporary staff. Simple presence, not trained in patrol. Leaves bathrooms unattended. 4. Cameras LVT Specialized Security Cameras - LVT Security Cameras (one of several manufactures) This option is what is used in mall parking lots. Locally, the City of Richland (CoR) implemented a pilot program in August 2025 and notes positive results with basic features. Staff received a quote to lease two (2) fixed pole mounted cameras and two (2) mobile security units (trailers). Costs: $10,871 monthly; $131k annual program. Equipment Lease Fixed Pole: $1,353.90 monthly Trailer: $2,397.50 monthly Additional Fees Fixed Pole: $875.87 monthly Trailer: $808.50 monthly Pros: Positive results realized in CoR. Trailer(s) can be relocated as needed. Several technological features to further deterrence and notifications. Leasing provides maintenance plan and vandalism is included. Cons: Expectations of police Can only view 2 sides of a building. Can’t monitor inside activity. No physical staff on site. 5. Cameras similar to other City sites Combine 3 different technologies, wireless networking, city purchased cameras, and city video storage system. Hardware purchase plus annual ongoing support and licensing. Video system allows live view of camera feeds. Page 22 of 266 Costs: $11k annually excluding installation and power needs. Pros: Cameras and video system familiar to staff. 24 hours recording. Cons: Limited to fixed (non-mobile), single camera view. Can send email notification of any motion detected. For options 4 & 5, consideration of these options should include: Limitations on real-time enforcement availability to lead to after incident review and investigations Records retention and requests Alert fatigue Inside activities are not monitored 6. Locks Keypad Costs:$1,000 per lock Pros: Low cost and easy to install. Provides controlled access if needed. Can be used for staff or limited public use. Cons: Codes are easily shared, reducing effectiveness. Requires ongoing manual management (battery replacement, code updates). Not centrally managed unless integrated with a larger system. May present usability challenges for some users. Recommendation Staff recommend a phased approach that balances cost, effectiveness, and operational feasibility: 1. Implement closure checks at identified locations to reduce overnight misuse. This option is relatively low-cost and may be accommodated within existing budget resources. 2. Further evaluate LVT security camera systems, including: a. A 30-day pilot program to assess effectiveness in Pasco park conditions; or b. A 1-year agreement for targeted deployment at high-incident locations. while monitoring and deterrence cost-effective prioritizes approach This allowing the City to evaluate performance before making larger financial commitments. Staff also recommend that any selected option be considered as part of a layered strategy, which may include a combination of monitoring, access control, and operational adjustments. Constraints Funding: Current budget limitations restrict full implementation of higher- cost options Page 23 of 266 Infrastructure: Some options require power and network connectivity not currently available at all sites Staffing Capacity: Increased staffing options require additional oversight, vehicles, and coordination Enforcement Limitations: Police response may be limited based on call prioritization Public Accessibility: Some solutions may create barriers for certain user groups Next Steps Depending on Council direction, staff will: 1. Begin to contract for services. 2. Return with budget amendment if necessary. 3. Evaluate success of implemented strategy based on: Reduction in vandalism incidents Decrease in restroom closures Reduction in maintenance and repair costs Improved availability of facilities for public use Alternatives 1. Provide staff direction on preferred option(s). 2. Provide staff direction to continue research into options. 3. No action. 4. Close all park bathrooms and do not place portable toilets (City of Yakima approach for budget savings). 5. Close all park bathrooms and place portable toilets. Page 24 of 266 April 27, 2026 Pasco City Council Workshop Pa g e 2 5 o f 2 6 6 Park Bathroom Security Enhancement Options April 27, 2026 Pasco City Council Pa g e 2 6 o f 2 6 6 •28 parks •7 permanent restroom facilities •Operate seasonally •Hours of Operation: 7am-8pm •Secured through automated locking systems •Supplemented by portable toilets during the off-season and after hours •Cleaned daily by seasonal staff Despite efforts, recurring issues occur with higher incidents occurring at: •Volunteer •Sylvester •Memorial •Schlagel Background 3 Pa g e 2 7 o f 2 6 6 Constraints 1.Infrastructure 2.Staffing Capacity 3.Enforcement Limitations 4.Public Accessibility 5.Funding Expectations 1.No single strategy will eliminate vandalism or misuse. 2.Options aim to reduce incidents, improve response, and increase availability. 3.Monitoring tools support investigations after incidents, while staffing provides real-time deterrence. 4.Police response will vary based on call volume. Discussion 4 Pa g e 2 8 o f 2 6 6 Utilize security service to check bathrooms at closing time to ensure there are no occupants and doors are secured. Cost: $10 per location, per check. a)All permanent bathrooms = $70 daily; $15k for season b)5 bathrooms (4 + Chiawana) = $50 daily; $10,650for season Pros: Limits damage overnight by clearing bathrooms and ensuring doors are not propped open. Cons: Does not cover hours bathrooms are open. Option 1 – Closure Checks 5 Pa g e 2 9 o f 2 6 6 A.One security guard at each of the 4 bathrooms during open hours. Cost: $62k monthly; $434k for season Pros: Trained security presence, ability to monitor both inside and out. Cons: No cleaning service B. Two security guards rotating between 2 bathrooms during open hours. Cost: $26,256 monthly; $184k for season Pros: Trained security presence, ability to monitor both inside and out. Cons: Bathrooms left unsupervised during the rotation and overnight No cleaning service Option 2 – Security Services 6 Pa g e 3 0 o f 2 6 6 Staff at each bathroom during open hours Costs: $71,500 monthly; $500k for season Pros: Provides both presence and continuous cleaning service. Cons: Costly Expanded use of City vehicles by temporary staff Simple presence, not trained in patrol Staff rotating between bathrooms Cost: $35,750 monthly; $250,250 for season Pros: Provides both presence and continuous cleaning service. Cons: Costly Expanded use of City vehicles by temporary staff Simple presence, not trained in patrol Leaves bathrooms unattended Option 3 – Temp Staffing Services 7 Pa g e 3 1 o f 2 6 6 Mobile security units Costs: Quoted to lease two (2) fixed pole mounted cameras and two (2) mobile security units (trailers) $10,871 monthly; $131k annual program •Fixed Pole: $2,230 monthly •Trailer: $3,206 monthly Pros: Trailer(s) can be relocated as needed. Positive feedback from CoR Several technological features to further deterrence and notifications are included Leasing provides maintenance plan and vandalism is included. Cons: Costs Police response expectations Option 4 – Cameras (LVT or other) 8 Pa g e 3 2 o f 2 6 6 Costs: $11k annually Hardware, installation and power need costs Pros: Cameras and video system familiar to staff 24 hours recording Video system allows live view of camera feeds Cons: Limited to fixed (non-mobile), single camera view Records retention & requests Option 5 – Install cameras currently used at other City facilities 9 Pa g e 3 3 o f 2 6 6 Costs: $1,000 per lock Pros: Easy to install Provides controlled access Cons: Codes are easily shared Requires ongoing manual management (battery replacement, code updates) Not centrally managed unless integrated with a larger system May present usability challenges for some users Option 6 – Keypad Locks 10 Pa g e 3 4 o f 2 6 6 Recommendation Implementation of a phased and layered approach that balances cost, effectiveness, and operational feasibility: 1.Implement closure checks at identified locations to reduce overnight misuse. 2.If desired, further evaluate LVT security camera systems such as: I.A 30-day pilot program II.A 1-year agreement for targeted deployment at high-incident location(s.) Alternatives 1.Provide staff direction on preferred option(s). 2.Provide staff direction to continue research into options. 3.No action. 4.Close all park bathrooms and do not place portable toilets 5.Close all park bathrooms and place portable toilets 11 Pa g e 3 5 o f 2 6 6 Depending on Council direction, staff will: 1.Contract for services 2.Return with budget amendment if necessary 3.Evaluate success of implemented strategy based on: •Reduction in vandalism incidents •Decrease in restroom closures •Reduction in maintenance and repair costs •Improved availability of facilities for public use Next Steps 12 Pa g e 3 6 o f 2 6 6 Questions?Pa g e 3 7 o f 2 6 6 Pa g e 3 8 o f 2 6 6 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 25, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 4/27/26 FROM: Angela Pashon, Director Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Downtown Light & Activation Plan (Alleyways) (10 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Downtown Masterplan Draft Lighting Activation and Safety Plan Current Alleyway Lighting II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Provide direction on implementation approach related to downtown alleyway lighting improvements. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated total cost between $140k-$271k for all alleyways listed in Plan with string lighting (2,150 linear feet at 24" spacing): Lighting Kit = $53,750 ($25/lf) Installation o Contractor = $217,322 ($101.08/lf) o In-house = $86,000 ($40/lf) Equipment Funding Source: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Gran Secured $131,590 (not all to be used for this project, remaining to support Park Security/Pathway CIP project).Constraint: Funds must be used for equipment purchases by June 30, 2026. Installation Funding Source: Unsecured, likely Economic Development or Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) Can redistribute funding for Park Security/Pathway CIP to this project and redistribute Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant funds to backfill for equipment purchase. Page 39 of 266 Cost Drivers: Equipment Electrical installation Project management Property owner coordination IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background: The Downtown Master Plan (DTMP) identifies the need for improved lighting to support safety, pedestrian comfort, and nighttime economic activity. As part of the DTMP staff worked with consultant to develop a Lighting Activation and Safety Plan (Plan) that uses a layered lighting approach to improve both function and placemaking throughout downtown. A nighttime field review, conducted with the Police Department, identified alleyways as priority areas due to inconsistent lighting and safety concerns. The plan recommends five lighting types: 1. Roadway lighting 2. Pedestrian lighting 3. Storefront lighting 4. “Gem” lighting (placemaking features) 5. Alleyway lighting Alleyway lighting in the Plan is not inclusive of all alleyways in the Downtown. The identified alleyways are prioritized based on the 2024 nighttime field review. Impact (other than fiscal): Improves public safety and visibility in underutilized areas Discourages illegal or unwanted activity Enhances pedestrian connectivity between streets Supports downtown vibrancy and economic activity Creates opportunities for events, art, and placemaking in alleyways City staff have approached the implementation of the Plan leading with safety improvements and implementation based on City ownership or control of adjacent property. Utilizing the alleyway behind Pasco Specialty Kitchen, staff have taken several steps to pilot the implementation of the Plan. This work has included evaluating the lighting options identified in the Plan and coordinating with key partners to Page 40 of 266 address site-specific constraints. Staff worked with Basin Disposal (BDI) to ensure proposed lighting heights would not interfere with waste collection operations and coordinated with the Franklin PUD to assess potential conflicts with overhead power lines in alleyways. In addition, Facilities staff met with a local electrician to review installation requirements of the proposed lighting options. Staff have evaluated the utilization of more standard string (catenary) lighting which would provide greater flexibility for installation and consistency with lighting installed at the Farmer's Market. The Plan was developed with the assumption the City would serve as the long-term maintainer of the lighting. For most alleyways identified in the Plan, the City can serve as the power source limiting long-term property owner responsibility. Based on a 2026 alleyway review by Police, property owners in some of the identified alleyways have enhanced lighting since the initial night walk; see attachment "Current Alleyway Lighting". V. DISCUSSION: Recommendations Staff is requesting Council's desired direction and provides the following options for consideration: 1. Proceed with installation of string (catenary) lighting in identified alleyways. This option: Allows, in most identified alleyways, for the City to provide the power source and maintain the lighting elements indefinitely Is more cost-effective than the Plan's recommended lighting package Provides adequate lighting while supporting downtown character Generally limits impact on property owners although participation is not guaranteed (installation will require building owner approval) 2. Offer lighting replacement equipment for property owners to install and maintain themselves. This option: Reduces long-term City maintenance and financial commitment Reduces City risk by eliminating City installation on private property Could be used to support Pasco Municipal Code changes to require illumination in Downtown alleyways by property owners Provides additional funding to advance increasing lighting in City parks 3. Use grant funding secured to support the Parks Security/Pathway Lighting Project. This option: Improves safety Extends park usage times Reduces after hours unwanted activity Page 41 of 266 Supports reinvestment into City owned properties Does not provide downtown alley lighting Constraints (time or other considerations) Grant funds must be spent on equipment by June 30, 2026 Development of property use agreements that are clear on responsibility and risks such as potential property damage during install if this option is selected if the City installs Long-term utility costs and maintenance considerations depending on option selected Staff availability is limited; consider phased, multi-year approach or contract out for services Next Steps If option 1 is selected, staff will: Purchase lighting equipment using grant funds Begin the process of coordinating with adjacent property owners If desired to complete at once, contract for installation If phased approach is desired, schedule 1-2 alleyways by the end of 2026 If option 2 is selected, staff will: Contact property owners of desired equipment Purchase equipment If option 3 is selected, staff will: Purchase and install equipment Alternatives 1. Limit lighting improvements to select high-priority alleyways 2. Pursue alternative lighting types (e.g., flood lighting), recognizing higher cost and complexity 3. Take no action at this time (grant funding expiring June 30, 2026) Page 42 of 266 Current Alleyway Lighting Pasco Police completed a drone flight early in 2026. The images below are taken from this video to show current illumination of the identified alleyways. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3 2 1 Page 43 of 266 Alleyway 1 Alleyway 2 Page 44 of 266 Alleyway 3 Alleyway 4 Page 45 of 266 Alleyway 5 Alleyway 6 Page 46 of 266 Alleyway 6 (second view) Alleyway 7 Page 47 of 266 Alleyway 8 Alleyway 9 Page 48 of 266 Alleyway 10 Page 49 of 266 April 27, 2026 Pasco City Council Workshop Pa g e 5 0 o f 2 6 6 Downtown Lighting & Activation Plan (Alleyways) April 27, 2026 Pasco City Council Pa g e 5 1 o f 2 6 6 •Downtown Masterplan identified need for improved lighting to support: •Safety •Pedestrian comfort •Nighttime economic activity •Lighting Activation & Safety Plan (Plan) •Night walk completed 2024 •Layered approach •Improve function & placemaking •Developed assuming City would maintain Plan recommends (5) lighting types 1.Roadway 2.Pedestrian 3.Storefront 4.Gem/Placemaking 5.Alleyway 1.Two options outlined Background 3 Pa g e 5 2 o f 2 6 6 •Plan not inclusive of all alleyways •Grant funds secured for lighting equipment purchase •Deadline 6/30/26 •Funds are not exclusive to this project •$131k •Pilot alleyway (#2) used for planning purposes •Coordination with PUD, BDI, and Electrician •Police conducted 2026 drone review Alleyway Lighting 4 Pa g e 5 3 o f 2 6 6 Alleyway #1 5 Pa g e 5 4 o f 2 6 6 Alleyway #2 6 Pa g e 5 5 o f 2 6 6 Alleyway #3 7 Pa g e 5 6 o f 2 6 6 Alleyway #4 8 Pa g e 5 7 o f 2 6 6 Alleyway #5 9 Pa g e 5 8 o f 2 6 6 Alleyway #6 10 Pa g e 5 9 o f 2 6 6 Alleyway #7 11 Pa g e 6 0 o f 2 6 6 Alleyway #8 12 Pa g e 6 1 o f 2 6 6 Alleyway #9 13 Pa g e 6 2 o f 2 6 6 Alleyway #10 14 Pa g e 6 3 o f 2 6 6 Staff is requesting Council’s desired direction: 1.Proceed with installation of string lighting in identified alleyways, City to maintain •Property owner coordination, long- term maintenance, supports DT character, $ needed for installation 2.Offer lighting replacement equipment for property owners to install and maintain •Reduces risk and long-term maintenance to City, couple with modification to PMC for illumination in DT alleyways, remaining grant funds to support Parks Security Lighting Project 3.Use secured funding to support Parks Security Lighting Project •Extends park usage time, improves safety in City parks, Recommendation 15 Pa g e 6 4 o f 2 6 6 1.Limit lighting improvements to high- priority alleyways 2.Pursue alternative lighting types, higher cost and complexity 3.Take no action Alternatives 16 Pa g e 6 5 o f 2 6 6 Questions?Pa g e 6 6 o f 2 6 6 Pa g e 6 7 o f 2 6 6 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 3, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/27/26 FROM: Haylie Matson, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Commercial Land Capacity Review (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): 01 Land Use Map 02 Land Capacity Assessment Questions + Analysis from City Land Use Consultants 03 Powerpoint II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: No formal action is requested. Staff is requesting clear policy direction from Council on how to approach pending (and optional) Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, particularly those proposing to convert commercial land to residential. This direction will guide staff recommendations as part of the Comprehensive Plan update, including future land use policies and evaluation of similar land use and zoning requests. The current land use map for Pasco is attached for reference. The red and purple areas on the map (commercial and mixed-use designations) generally follow major arterials or are strategically located based on surrounding uses, visibility, and service needs within the community. III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Discussion only. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: This staff report outlines the City’s commercial land capacity and the policy considerations associated with current Comprehensive Plan (land use) Page 68 of 266 amendment requests. Additional technical information prepared by the City’s consultants is included in the Land Capacity Assessment Questions document in the attached materials. As part of the Comprehensive Plan update, the City completed a Land Capacity Analysis to determine whether there is sufficient land to support projected housing and employment growth through 2046. The analysis shows the City currently has approximately 532 acres of vacant commercial land and 143 acres of underutilized commercial land, along with additional mixed-use capacity. This inventory supports approximately 7,800 commercial jobs and more than 13,000 total jobs when industrial and pipeline development are included. Pasco is projected to add approximately 13,000 jobs by 2046, requiring the City to maintain sufficient land designated for employment uses. Under current assumptions, the City maintains a modest surplus of commercial land capacity, estimated at approximately 140 acres. However, this surplus is narrow and highly sensitive to change. Under alternative assumptions that allow greater residential development within commercial and mixed-use areas, the City shifts to a significant deficit exceeding 1,000 acres of commercial land capacity. At the same time, the City has received approximately 30 land use amendment requests this cycle. Several of these requests propose converting commercially designated land to residential uses. The requests result in a range of approximately 61 to 167 acres of commercially designated land potentially affected, depending on how mixed- designation parcels are counted. At the upper end of that range, the loss of commercial land would exceed the City’s current surplus and move the City into a deficit. In other words, this means the City’s current surplus of about 140 acres would be fully used up and exceeded if up to 167 acres are converted, resulting in a shortfall of land needed to support future jobs, businesses, and services. V. DISCUSSION: Pasco’s land use pattern reflects its role as a regional employment center with a strong industrial base. Approximately 10 percent of the City’s land is designated commercial, while a significantly larger share supports industrial uses. Industrial land is a critical component of the City’s economic foundation. It supports major employers and regional economic activity and is the most Page 69 of 266 difficult type of employment land to replace once lost. Compared to other Eastern Washington Cities, Pasco already maintains a relatively balanced but employment-focused land use pattern as shown in the table below: City Percentage of Land Use Designation Commercial Industrial Residential Open Space Pasco 10 37 46 5 Kennewick* 12 5 67 10 Richland** 9 22 32 16 Wenatchee*** 8 10 74 6 West Richland** 9.5 .3 46 N/A Airway Heights**** 20 38 13+ 13 *Based on the 2021 Comprehensive Plan **Based on 2017 Comprehensive Plan ***Based on 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update ****Based on Comprehensive Plan documents in 2022 Planning Commission Meeting records. This document listed 408 acres in the R-1 zone (13% of total city acres) but did not list acreage for other residential zones. These comparisons highlight that Pasco carries a significantly larger share of industrial land than many peer cities, reinforcing its role as an employment center within the region. In addition to meeting employment targets, maintaining commercial land is critical City The goals. development the City’s supporting to economic continues to see retail leakage to surrounding jurisdictions, where residents travel outside Pasco for shopping, dining, and entertainment. Preserving and strategically locating commercial land creates opportunities to attract destination retail and services that keep spending within the community. Impact (other than fiscal) Converting the existing commercial land in Pasco to residential has long term impacts beyond individual projects. From a capacity standpoint, the City is at or near a tipping point, where additional conversion of commercial land begins to impact its ability to meet long-term employment targets. Once commercial land is converted and developed residentially, it is effectively removed from the employment land supply for decades. Unlike residential land, commercial land cannot easily be intensified or replaced once lost. Conversion also affects access to services. Fewer commercial areas limit Page 70 of 266 opportunities for neighborhood services and increase reliance on existing corridors, resulting in longer travel distances and increased traffic demand. Converting commercial land to residential also reduces the City’s ability to attract retail and destination uses that generate local spending. When commercial opportunities are limited, residents are more likely to spend money in neighboring cities, resulting in lost sales tax revenue and fewer local amenities. Discussion In terms of the state-mandated Comprehensive Plan update, there is no required ratio of commercial to residential land. The key requirement is that the City demonstrates it can meet both housing and employment growth targets over time. From an economic development standpoint, the City may choose to maintain or expand its commercial land base to support long-term growth. Currently, staff is not proposing to add new commercial land through this update, but rather to maintain the existing inventory. Under current assumptions, the City maintains a small surplus of commercial land. However, that surplus can be eliminated quickly depending on how land use decisions are made. The primary concern is the cumulative effect of the approximately 30 pending amendment requests. While each request may appear reasonable when viewed individually, the combined impact poses a clear risk to long term employment capacity. Additional considerations include: Market realities: Residential development consistently outcompetes commercial uses, particularly in mixed-use zones. Even when commercial is allowed, it is often not constructed. Mixed-use limitations: While mixed-use designations can provide flexibility, current regulatory limitations reduce the City’s ability to ensure commercial development occurs in these areas. Employment land constraints: Limited ability to replace lost commercial and industrial land once converted. Community expectations: Residents continue to express a need for more requires which services, retail, and dining, neighborhood preserving commercial land in appropriate locations. The analysis also supports prioritizing the preservation of specific types of land, including: Industrial lands that support long term economic development Established commercial corridors and nodes Opportunities for neighborhood-scale commercial that support daily needs and reduce travel demand From a practical standpoint, the City is approaching a point where continued Page 71 of 266 conversion of commercial land will begin to directly limit its ability to meet employment targets and support long term economic development. From an economic development perspective, preserving commercial land is not only about job capacity but also about competitiveness within the Tri-Cities region. Retail and entertainment uses tend to cluster in areas where sufficient land and visibility exist. Without maintaining and planning for these areas, Pasco risks missing opportunities to attract destination businesses that draw both residents and visitors. If we do not preserve space for these uses, we are effectively planning for that spending to occur somewhere else. Recommendation Staff recommends that Council provide clear policy direction to limit the conversion of commercially designated land to residential uses, particularly where such conversions would reduce long term employment capacity. Staff further recommends establishing a consistent framework for evaluating these requests, which may include: 1. Prioritizing preservation of key commercial corridors, nodes, and industrial areas 2. Requiring a demonstrated public benefit for any proposed conversion 3. Requiring offsetting commercial land designations when conversion is approved 4. Limiting conversions where cumulative impacts would reduce overall capacity below projected need 5. Supporting development of commercial areas that attract retail, dining, and destination uses that retain local spending within the City This direction is necessary to ensure the City maintains sufficient commercial land to support projected job growth, economic development, and community service needs over time. The direction provided will inform staff in three key areas: 1. Development of Comprehensive Plan policies 2. Evaluation of future amendment requests 3. Processing of current applications Constraints (time or other considerations) City code does not allow applicant-initiated amendments during the periodic update, and the City may elect not to process these requests. However, the CED Department has accepted proposals for consideration with the understanding that applications not advanced this cycle will need to be resubmitted in the future. The Comprehensive Plan update is on a defined timeline, and amendment requests are already under review. Without policy direction, staff is limited in its ability to provide consistent recommendations for current and future applications and to effectively update Comprehensive Plan policies related to this issue. Page 72 of 266 Next Steps Staff will incorporate Council direction from the April workshop into both the Comprehensive Plan update and the review of pending amendment requests. A workshop is scheduled for May 11 to review amendments and associated requests. Staff will provide recommendations based on feedback received from Council and the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will also be briefed on this topic and asked to provide input. Alternatively, Council May 1. Direct staff to proceed with converting all or some properties from commercial to residential. 2. Direct staff to delay processing any applications requesting conversion until after completion of the Comprehensive Plan update. 3. Direct staff to evaluate requests on a case-by-case basis, with a clear expectation to preserve sufficient commercial land to meet long term employment needs. 4. Direct staff to limit conversions and require that any loss of commercial land be offset by designation of new commercial land within the same application, subject to property owner agreement and City verification of an acceptable swap. Page 73 of 266 Do c u m e n t P a t h : \\ g s d a t a s t o r e \ G I S \ G I S P r o j e c t s \ D e p t C E D P l a n n i n g \ Z O N I N G \ P R O J E C T _ F I L E \ Z O N I N G \ Z O N I N G . a p r x 1:28,000 LAND USE FILE NAME 1 of 1Scale: 1:28,000 SHEET NUMBERSCALE kaufmannc CREATED BY 7/16/2025 PLOT DATE NOTICE: WARRANTY OF ACCURACY. The materials provided with this product, including but not limited to, data, maps, and tables (collectively, 'information'), are presented 'AS IS' without any warranty, express or implied. The City of Pasco and its staff do not warrant the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the information and shall not be liable for any inaccuracies or omissions. The information is subject to change and is intended solely for general informational purposes. Users should independently verify critical information and seek professional advice when necessary. Prior to any digging or excavation, it is essential for safety and compliance with local regulations that users contact 'Call Before You Dig' services by dialing 811. This ensures the location and safety of underground utilities are confirmed before any ground is broken. The City of Pasco does not endorse any specific commercial products or services referenced in the information. Reliance on this information is at the user's own risk. NOTES LEGEND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPT GIS LAND USE Land Use Future Land Use Airport Reserve Commercial Confederated Tribes - Colville DNR Reserve High Density Residential Industrial Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium High Density Residential Mixed Residential Commercial Mixed Use Interchange Office Open Space Parks Public Quasi-Public Reclamation <all other values> Boundaries Pasco City Limits Pasco Urban Growth Boundary Roads Interstate Highway Ramp Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Future Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Future Collector Collector Future Neightborhood Collector Neightborhood Collector Future Local Other Rivers Roads_WWCO Roads_web_FCO Streets_KNW Airport DBO.CityLimitMask Rivers Roads Interstate Highway Ramp Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Future Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Future Collector Collector Future Neightborhood Collector Neightborhood Collector Future Local Other Pasco City Limits Pasco Urban Growth Boundary Land Use Future Land Use Airport Reserve Commercial Confederated Tribes - Colville DNR Reserve High Density Residential Industrial Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium High Density Residential Mixed Residential Commercial Mixed Use Interchange Office Open Space Parks Public Quasi-Public Reclamation <all other values> 0 0.5 1 1.5 2Miles ² KENNEWICK RICHLAND FRANKLIN COUNTY Pa g e 7 4 o f 2 6 6 March, 26, 2026 Pasco Comprehensive Plan Update Memorandum from Framework and BERK Consulting to City Staff Land Capacity Assessment Questions + Analysis March 26, 2026 1. Item Removed – Not Applicable to Presentation 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Rezones (From Haylie Matson to Framework) We have approximately 30 Comprehensive Plan and land use amendments with associated rezones to process. These are separate from the work Framework is already looking at related to areas where zoning and land use are out of sync. What is the status of that exercise? We are ready to meet and discuss these applications. Should this meeting be scheduled with Framework only, or should we include BERK as well? BERK updated the LCA based on the changes that Council was briefed on and we have closed most of the gap on housing. We still have a gap of approximately 400 units in the lower AMI bands but those could be made up through other strategies that we are exploring and will share when we meet next. The mapping exercise yielded 100s of parcels that are out of sync. We should discuss the level of review and analysis support you would like from Framework and BERK on these as it could be a signiflcant effort and beyond our current scope of work. We can certainly include the changes in the LCA analysis but if the City would like us to provide guidance and recommendations on each application it may require a scope amendment. Page 75 of 266 March, 26, 2026 3. Commercial Land Capacity Review: 3a. How much vacant land is currently zoned commercial: From Exhibit 7 in LCA memo (city limits only, net acres before market or infrastructure deductions). Included Commercial/Office Zones: BP, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-R, O, and Broadmoor Commercial Overlay w/C-1 underlying zoning • Vacant: 531.90 acres • Underutilized: 143.23 acres Table 1: Vacant and Underutilized Commercial Land Land Use Category Zones Included in Calculation Vacant Land Underutilized Land Commercial/Office Zones BP, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-R, O, and Broadmoor Commercial Overlay w/ C-1 underlying zoning 531. 90 acres 143.23 acres Mixed-Use Zones MU and Broadmoor Mixed R-C w/C-1 or MU underlying zoning 62.68 acres 0 acres Industrial Zones I-1, I-2, or I-3 1,404.04 acres 135.15 acres Total 2000 acres 278 acres 3b. What is our commercial growth capacity based on current assumptions? From Exhibit 10 and Exhibit 12 in LCA memo (city limits only). Table 2: Current Job Capacity Job Type # of jobs Current zoning Sensitivity Analysis Commercial 7,807 7,807 Industrial 4,515 4,515 Pipeline* 820 820 Total 13,142 11,854 *Based on 286,850 square feet of commercial space Page 76 of 266 March, 26, 2026 Assumptions: Table 3: Assumed Employment Density by Zone Job Type Employment Density Commercial 18.1 jobs/acre Industrial 4.3 jobs/acre Pipeline* 1/350 sf Table 4: Assumed % of Commercial by Zone Zone % Commercial Current zoning Sensitivity Analysis C-1, C-2, C-3 and Broadmoor Commercial Overlay 90% 75% BP, C-R, and O 100% 100% MU and Broadmoor Mixed R-C 50% 35% I-1, I-2, I-3 100% 100% 3c. What are best practices for cities of our size and projected growth in terms of land use balance such as Mixed Use, Single Family, Multifamily, Industrial, and Commercial. There is no “correct” ratio of commercial to residential land that cities should be striving for. Pasco must show that it can meet job capacity and housing targets, which is one indication of whether its land use balance is functioning well. But cities vary greatly and their distributions of land uses refiect their unique characteristics. For example, Pasco’s current use of 40% of its lands for industrial and ~10% for commercial refiects it’s role as a regional agricultural and industrial processing hub, anchored by the Port of Pasco, and is a major distinguishing factor that makes it unique among the Tri-Cities and much of Eastern WA. Questions the city might ask include how to best distribute commercial uses to reduce traffic? How can commercial areas be designed to be walkable? What types of jobs does the City want to attract? See Table 5 for land use comparisons. Page 77 of 266 March, 26, 2026 3d. Based on projected employment growth and planning assumptions, how much commercial and employment land should Pasco plan for through the 2046 planning horizon? We’re assuming an additional 12,997 jobs in the City of Pasco by 2046 (or 38,030 total jobs in the city by 2046). Total acres of land needed to meet that growth varies depending on how much is commercial vs. industrial based on the following formula. Note that buildable acres is not the same as vacant + underutilized acres from Part A above (which is before deductions). Additional Jobs = Acres of Land x Job Density AND Additional Jobs = COMMERCIAL [Acres of Land x Job Density] + INDUSTRIAL [Acres of Land x Job Density] Where: Additional Jobs = (Job Growth) – (Pipeline Jobs) Acres of Land = Buildable acres OR 12,997 – 820 jobs = (Buildable Ac. Commercial x 18.1 jobs/ac) + (Buildable Ac. Industrial x 4.3 jobs/ac) 12,117 jobs = (Buildable Ac. Commercial x 18.1 jobs/ac) + (Buildable Ac. Industrial x 4.3 jobs/ac) Additional Jobs (2046) Job Density (jobs/acre) Acres of Land* Needed (2046) 12,177** 18.1 673 *Buildable Acres **Not including pipeline jobs 3e. How many commercial acres would be lost if all current application requests were approved. @Daniel to provide this calculation. See staff report. Page 78 of 266 March, 26, 2026 3f. Do current land capacity assumptions indicate Pasco has a surplus or deflcit of commercial land over the planning horizon. Acres of Commercial Land Surplus / (Deficit) Current 141* Sensitivity Analysis (1,143)* * Assuming 8.0 acre surplus with 18.1 commercial jobs /acre or ~33.3 acre surplus with 4.3 industrial jobs /acre * Assumes more residential in commercial and mixed use areas) = ~63.1 acre deficit assuming 18.1 commercial jobs/acre or ~263.3 acre deficit assuming 4.3 industrial jobs/acre 3g. At what point would converting commercial land to residential begin to create a long-term shortage of commercial or employment land. From a purely numerical perspective, the Baseline Land Capacity Analysis and its underlying assumptions already place Pasco at a tipping point. The 30 comprehensive plan amendments currently pending this year, many of which include land use changes that convert commercial land to residential land, already jeopardize the City’s ability to meet its employment growth capacity targets. More broadly, the gradual erosion of commercial land places increased strain on the city to support its tax base and economic growth goals. While it is technically possible to reverse a commercial-to-residential conversion, the reality is that once residential development occurs on former commercial land, the commercial use is effectively halted for the next 50 to 75 years or even more, so long as the housing structure still stands. Unlike residential land, where density increases and middle housing can bring about new housing capacity, for commercial lands the only way to “densify” or bring any back is to redesignate land elsewhere - which the Council has indicated it does not favor. 3h. Are there speciflc categories of commercial land such as regional retail, neighborhood commercial, employment centers, highway commercial, or mixed-use corridors that should be protected or prioritized from conversion. • Depending on their values and goals for economic growth, cities will prioritize commercial land types differently. In Pasco, the city might be best served in prioritizing the protection of industrial lands. These lands form the economic backbone of the City, and are the most difficult to “replace.” With the Port actively seeking to diversify its industrial tenant base, converting industrial land would Page 79 of 266 March, 26, 2026 directly undermine some of the most concrete and impactful economic development opportunities the City will see in both the near- and long-term. • The relative importance of other commercial land use categories, including regional retail, mixed-use corridors, and more, is less cut-and-dried. However, the community has expressed a desire for more shopping, dining, and service opportunities in Pasco. Preserving existing commercial nodes and corridors, currently zoned C-1, C-2, and C-3, and locating more density in these places, is an effective way to ensure that Pasco retains its current and future residential and commercial development capacity. • The GMA has a strong focus on reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) by single- occupancy vehicles, a goal that could simultaneously address the community’s frustration with increasing traffic demands. Allowing mixed-use and neighborhood- level commercial development would increase the accessibility of goods and services to meet the daily needs of residents, locating them closer to where people live and reducing the strain on Pasco’s busiest commercial corridors. 3i. Would shifting some areas to mixed-use designations provide fiexibility while still preserving employment capacity. Shifting some areas to zoning designations that allow both residential and commercial uses could provide fiexibility while preserving employment capacity. However, the feasibility of commercial versus residential could result in the development of primarily residential land uses in these zones. Further, with the recently-passed SB6026 in place, cities may not have the ability to require ground fioor retail, resulting in mixed-used zones that essentially function as residential. An alternative approach would be to designate areas as neighborhood commercial, supporting small hubs where residents can access daily needs. This would not only ensure that employment capacity is met, but promote walkable neighborhoods and help to reduce retail-oriented traffic. The community survey shows 80% of respondents in favor of introducing small corner shops into neighborhoods. j. How does Pasco’s commercial land ratio compare to similar fast-growing cities in Washington and the Tri-Cities region. The following table summarizes the break down of land uses according to zoning categories in cities in the Tri-Cities region and Eastern Washington. Note that percentages do not add up to 100, as cities have various other categories including Transition zones, Public Service, etc. These numbers do not show current land use and include vacant parcels. Page 80 of 266 March, 26, 2026 Table 5: Land Use Ratios in Eastern Washington Cities City Percentage of Land Use Designation Commercial Industrial Residential Open Space Pasco 10 37 46 5 Kennewick* 12 5 67 10 Richland** 9 22 32 16 Wenatchee*** 8 10 74 6 West Richland** 9.5 .3 46 N/A Airway Heights**** 20 38 13+ 13 *Based on the 2021 Comprehensive Plan **Based on 2017 Comprehensive Plan ***Based on 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update ****Based on Comprehensive Plan documents in 2022 Planning Commission Meeting records. This document listed 408 acres in the R-1 zone (13% of total city acres) but did not list acreage for other residential zones. 3k. Are there additional metrics or analysis that should be included in a presentation to Council and the Planning Commission regarding Pasco’s commercial land capacity? The following tables show assumptions for Kennewick and Wenatchee LCAs. Table 6: Kennewick Assumptions Employment Density % Commercial Commercial Industrial Commercial Zones Business Park Zone Urban Mixed Use 26.2 jobs/acre 7.5 jobs/acre 90% 50% 35% Table 7: Wenatchee Assumptions Employment Density % Commercial Low Density Mixed Use** Commercial + High Density MU Industrial Low Density Mixed Use** Industrial 30 jobs/acre 40 jobs/acre* 15 jobs/acre* 50% 100% *Based on existing density of 36 commercial or government jobs/acre ** Neighborhood Commercial + Lower Density MU Page 81 of 266 Commercial Land Capacity Discussion April 27, 2026 Pasco City Council Pa g e 8 2 o f 2 6 6 OVERVIEW 1.Review current commercial land capacity 2.Summarize projected job growth and land needs 3.Discuss impact of current amendment requests 4.Highlight risks to long-term employment capacity 5.Request policy direction Pa g e 8 3 o f 2 6 6 Purpose / What We Are Asking From Council •No formal action today •Staff is requesting policy direction •Focus: commercial → residential conversionsPa g e 8 4 o f 2 6 6 What We Evaluated Land Capacity Analysis •Evaluates land for housing + jobs through 2026 •Commercial + industrial land supports employment growth •Key question: do we have enough land to meet future needs? Pa g e 8 5 o f 2 6 6 Current Commercial Capacity Where We Are Today •532 acres vacant commercial •143 acres underutilized •~7,800 commercial jobs supported •~13,000 total jobs supported Pa g e 8 6 o f 2 6 6 What the Numbers Show •~13,000 new jobs projected by 2046 •Current surplus is ~140 acres •Surplus is small and sensitive to change Pa g e 8 7 o f 2 6 6 Amendment Requests Impact •30 + amendment requests from applicants •Several requests propose commercial → residential conversion •100+ more for zoning/land use synchronization •Potential impact: ~61-167 acres affected, upper range exceeds Pasco’s surplus Pa g e 8 8 o f 2 6 6 Plain Language Impact What This Means •Small Buffer of Commercial Land Today •Conversions could: eliminate surplus, create shortage of business space, limit job growth capacity Pa g e 8 9 o f 2 6 6 Economic Development Considerations Long-Term Impacts •Commercial land supports, jobs, services, and tax base •Retail and dining uses require available, visible commercial sites •Limited commercial land reduces ability to attract destination businesses •Residents currently travel outside Pasco for shopping and entertainment •Lost opportunity to capture local spending and sales tax revenue Pa g e 9 0 o f 2 6 6 Why This Matters Long-Term Impacts •Reduces ability to support jobs •Limits future businesses and services •Increases traffic and service gaps •Commercial land is difficult to replace •Retail spending will occur elsewhere in Tri Cities Pa g e 9 1 o f 2 6 6 What We Are Seeing •Residential outcompetes commercial •Mixed-use often becomes residential •Limited ability to replace employment land •Community may want more services Pa g e 9 2 o f 2 6 6 Council Direction Needed How should the City approach: •Commercial → residential conversions? •Current amendment requests? •Future requests? •Policy on topic in Comprehensive Plan? Pa g e 9 3 o f 2 6 6 Alternatives Council may consider: •Allow conversions •Delay decisions until next year •Case-by-Case with limits •Require commercial land replacement (swap) Pa g e 9 4 o f 2 6 6 Staff Recommendation Staff Recommendation: •Limit or prevent conversion of commercial land •Protect key corridors and employment areas •Require clear public benefit or offset •Maintain commercial inventory Pa g e 9 5 o f 2 6 6 Questions?Pa g e 9 6 o f 2 6 6 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 1, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/27/26 FROM: Haylie Matson, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Q - Ordinance - Introduction of Quasi Judicial Item - Amending the Zoning Classification of certain real property located north of Wrigley Dr., south of Sandifur Pkwy., west of Road 68 and east Road 76, in Pasco, Franklin County, Washington from C-1 (Retail Business) and R-4 (High Density Residential) to MU (Mixed Use)(Z2026-001) (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Ordinance Hearing Examiner Recommendation Proposed Zoning Map PowerPoint II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Information Presentation III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background: On January 9th 2026, Elite Investment Group, LLC, with written authorization from Dennis Gisi and Terry & Karen Gilmore, submitted an application to rezone Parcel Nos. 116140050 and 116140049. The subject properties were annexed into the City in 1981 and were assigned the R-T (Residential Transition) zone. In 2003 both parcels were rezoned to C- 1 (Retail Business). In 2025, parcel no. 116140050 was rezoned from C-1 to R- 4 (High Density Residential). Both parcels are currently undeveloped and are bare ground. Page 97 of 266 Subsequent to the complete application and notice of public hearing, on March 11, 2026, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing to receive public testimony and review the request to rezone the parcels from C-1 and R-4 to MU, as illustrated on the proposed zoning map in the PowerPoint (Exhibit B). In accordance with PMC Subsection 25.210.060(2), the Hearing Examiner recommended approval of the rezone on March 20, 2026, finding it consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and forwarded the recommendation to the City Council for final consideration. No appeals of this recommendation have been received. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: North: C-1 Retail Business/Fire Station & Water tower East: C-1 Retail Business/ Medical Facilities & Commercial uses South: C-1 Retail Business/ Library, Medical Facilities, & Vacant land West: R-1 Low Density Residential/ Single Family Dwellings Impact (other than fiscal): The Pasco City Council has identified community safety as a key priority. The property in question has been vacant since 1981, making it susceptible to littering and unlawful dumping. Rezoning the property from C-1 and R-4 to MU would provide the owners with greater flexibility to develop the property into either commercial or residential development depending on market forces. V. DISCUSSION: Conclusion & Recommendation: Staff and the Hearing Examiner find that the requested rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal supports orderly growth, aligns with long-term development objectives, and provides a framework for future mixed-use development while ensuring that any future projects will be reviewed for compliance and potential mitigation. Accordingly, both Staff and the Hearing Examiner recommend that the City Council approve the requested rezones through the associated Ordinance. Constraints (Time or other considerations): The city is required to issue a decision within 120 days from date of complete application in accord with Title 4 of the PMC. The applicant was issued a Notice of Complete Application on February 23, 2026. Although the statutory deadline has not yet arrived, staff respectfully recommends that the City Council proceed with a timely review and processing of the application to Page 98 of 266 ensure orderly consideration and to serve the best interests of the community. Staff Analysis & Hearing Examiner Findings: Following the conclusion of an open record hearing on the properties rezone petition, the Hearing Examiner shall issue findings and conclusions based on the record, pursuant to PMC Subsection 25.210.060(1)(a) through (e), applying the initial review criteria set forth in PMC Section 25.210.030. The findings and conclusions are as follows: (a) The proposal is in accord with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Mixed Residential Commercial. The requested zoning is consistent with this designation and supports City of extension future development, promoting policies the infrastructure, and potential mixed-use growth. (b) The effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity will be materially detrimental The proposed zoning is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. Existing development patterns meet the minimum qualifications of their respective residential and commercial zones. Future development will be required to comply with City regulations for buffering, traffic, and setbacks, ensuring that potential impacts are minimized. (c) There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole Applying zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan creates opportunities for housing development, commercial development, supports the efficient extension of infrastructure, and promotes balanced growth. The proposal advances the City’s long-term goals. (d) Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the proposal No conditions are necessary as part of this rezone request. The application, as well as any future development, will be subject to the applicable provisions of the PMC and the City of Pasco Design and Construction Standards. (e) A concomitant agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and, if so, the terms and condition of such an agreement A concomitant agreement is not necessary for this proposal. The requested rezoning complies with all applicable City standards and requirements without the need for additional terms or conditions beyond those already provided in the PMC and adopted development regulations. Page 99 of 266 Next Steps: If the Ordinance is adopted, the City Clerk’s Office will record it with the Franklin County Auditor, and staff will issue a Notice of Decision to all affected parties. Alternatives: In accordance with PMC Section 25.210.080, if the City Council determines by majority vote that further review is warranted, a closed record hearing is required, and at least 14 days’ notice shall be given prior to the hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Council may approve the reclassification with or without modifications, enter into a concomitant agreement with the petitioner, or deny the reclassification. The Council may adopt the Hearing Examiner’s findings and conclusions or formulate alternative findings to support its decision to approve, modify, or deny the application. Page 100 of 266 Ordinance Rezone Z2026-001- 1 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: City of Pasco, Washington WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Pasco, Washington Attn: City Clerk 525 North 3rd Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF WRIGLEY DR., SOUTH OF SANDIFUR PKWY., WEST OF ROAD 68, AND ROAD 76, IN PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON FROM C-1 (RETAIL BUSINESS) & R-4 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO MU (MIXED USE), PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Elite Investment Group LLC, the petitioner, on behalf of Dennis Gisi and Terry & Karen Gilmore, seeks to rezone Parcel Nos. 116140049 and 1161400050, which are currently unaddressed, Pasco, Washington; and WHEREAS, a complete and adequate petition for change of zoning classification meeting the requirements of Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Section 25.210.030 was received by the City of Pasco (City) and, after notice was issued under PMC Section 25.210.040, an open record hearing was conducted by the Pasco Hearing Examiner upon such petition on April 27, 2026; and WHEREAS, based upon substantial evidence and demonstration of the Petitioner that: (a) the proposal is in accord with the goals and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan; (b) the effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity is not materially detrimental; (c) there is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole; (d) any impacts of the rezone application and anticipated development will be mitigated by the regulations and requirements of the Pasco Municipal Code and the City of Pasco Design and Constructions Standards; (e) a concomitant agreement is not required under these circumstances; and (f) the proposal is consistent with and satisfies all criteria in PMC Section 25.210.060; the Hearing Examiner has recommended to approve the rezone, which findings and recommendation are hereby adopted by the City Council, and the Hearing Examiner Report is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit A. Page 101 of 266 Ordinance Rezone Z2026-001- 2 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Pasco, Washington, and the Zoning Map, accompanying and being part of said Ordinance shall be and hereby is changed from C-1 (RETAIL BUSINESS) & R-4 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) to MU (MIXED USE) for the real property as shown in the Exhibit B attached hereto and described as follows: LOTS 2,3 BINDING SITE PLAN 2019-03 SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, STATE OF WASHINGTON. . Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this ordinance. Section 3. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including scrivener’s errors or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. Page 102 of 266 Ordinance Rezone Z2026-001- 3 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of _____, 202_. Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Krystle Shanks Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC Deputy City Clerk City Attorney Published: _____________________________ Page 103 of 266 CI T Y OF PA S C O LA N D US E HE A R I N G EX A M I N E R IN TH E MA T T E R OF ) RE C O I V I M E N D E D FI N D I N G S OF ) FA C T , RE C O M M E N D E D Z2 0 2 6 - 0 0 1 ) CO N C L U S I O N S OF LA W , AN D El i t e In v e s t m e n t Gr o u p LL C C- 1 an d R4 to ) RE C O M M E N D E D DE C I S I O N MU TH I S MA T T E R ha v i n g co m e on fo r he a r i n g in ?o n t of th e Ci t y of Pa s c o He a r i n g Ex a m i n e r on Ma r c h 11, 20 2 6 , th e He a r i n g Ex a m i n e r ha v i n g ta k e n ev i d e n c e he r e b y su b m i t s th e fo l l o w i n g Re c o m m e n d e d Fi n d i n g s of Fa c t , Re c o m m e n d e d Co n c l u s i o n s of La w , an d Re c o m m e n d e d De c i s i o n as fo l l o w s : I. RE C O M N I E N D E D FI N D I N G S OF FA C T 1. Ap p l i c a n t : El i t e In v e s t m e n t Gr o u p , LL C , C/ o Tr i n i Ga r i b a y , 58 0 4 Ro a d 90 , Su i t e A, Pa s c o , WA 99 3 0 1 ; 2. Pr o p o n e n t s : 2. ] . De n n i s Gi s i , 51 0 9 N Rd 68 St e E, Pa s c o , WA 99 3 0 1 2. 2 . Te r r y & Ka r e n Gi l m o r e , 21 0 1 N Co l u m b i a Ri v e r Rd , Pa s c o , WA 99 3 0 1 3. Re q u e s t : Re z o n e fr o m C- l (R e t a i l Bu s i n e s s ) an d R4 (H i g h De n s i t y Re s i d e n t i a l ) to Mi x e d — U s e . 4. Ti m e l i n e : Ja n u g y 9, 20 2 6 Ap ? c a t i o n Su b m i t t e d . ”1 Fe b r u a r y 23 , 20 2 6 _ _ Ap p l i c a t i o n De e m e d Co m p l e t e . Fe b r u a r y 25 , 20 2 6 Ap p l i c a t i o n No t i c e d fo r Pu b l i c He a r i n g to Pr o p e r t y Ow n e r s wi t h i n 30 0 fe e t . Fe b r u a r y 25 , 20 2 6 Ap p l i c a t i o n No t i c e d fo r Pu b l i c He a r i n g to th e Tr i - C i t y He r a l d . Ma r c h 5, 20 2 6 Pu b l i c He a r i n g St a f f Re p _ o r t Pu b l i s h e d 5. PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : 5. 1 . Pa r c e l No . : 11 6 1 4 0 0 4 9 (C - l to Mi x e d - U s e ) 5. 1 . 1 . L e g a l : LO T 2, BI N D I N G SI T E PL A N 20 1 9 ~ 0 3 5. 1 . 2 . P r o p e r t y Si z e : Ap p r o x i m a t e l y 2. 2 0 Ac r e s (9 5 , 7 7 5 sq u a r e fe e t ) 5. 2 . Pa r c e l No . : 11 6 1 4 0 0 5 0 (R - 4 to Mi x e d - U s e ) 5. 2 . 1 . L e g a l : LO T 3, BI N D I N G SI T E PL A N 20 1 9 - 0 3 5. 2 . 2 . P r o p e r t y Si z e : Ap p r o x i m a t e l y 2. 4 9 Ac r e s (1 0 8 , 5 3 9 sq u a r e fe e t ) Wr i g l e y Dr . , we s t of Ro a d 68 , so u t h of Sa n d i f u r Pk w y , an d ea s t of Ro a d 76 . 5. 4 . To t a l Pr o p e r t y Si z e : 4. 4 9 ac r e s 6. Ac c e s s : Th e si t e s wi l l ha v e ac c e s s fr o m Wr i g l e y Dr . an d Ro a d 76 . ZD 2 0 2 5 - 0 0 2 El i t e In v e s t m e n t Gr o u p LL C C- 1 an d R4 to MU Pa g e 1 of 6 Page 104 of 266 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . Ut i l i t i e s : Mu n i c i p a l wa t e r is av a i l a b l e in Wr i g l e y Dr . an d Ro a d 76 , an d se w e r is av a i l a b l e in Wr i g l e y Dr . LA N D US E AN D ZO N I N G : 8. 1 . Th e su b j e c t pr o p e r t i e s ar e cu r r e n t l y zo n e d C- 1 an d R— 4 . Th e ap p l i c a n t is re q u e s t i n g to re z o n e bo t h pa r c e l s to Mi x e d Us e . Bo t h pa r c e l s ar e cu r r e n t l y un d e v e l o p e d . 8. 2 . Su r r o u n d i n g pr o p e r t i e s ar e zo n e d an d de v e l o p e d as fo l l o w s : Re t a i l Bu s i n e s s ; Fi r e St a t i o n / Wa t e r To w e r Re t a i l Bu s i n e s s ; Me d i c a l fa c i l i t i e s / Re s t a u r a n t ! Co m m e r c i a l —_ Re t a i l Bu s i n e s s ; Un d e v e l o E d / Me d i c a l fa c i l i t i e s / Li b . 0- 1 We s t : R— l Lo w De n s i g Re s i d e n t i a l ; Si n . s CO M P R E H E N S I V E PL A N : 9. 1 . Th e Ci t y ’ s Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n de s i g n a t e s th e su b j e c t pr o p e r t y as Mi x e d Re s i d e n t i a l / C o n u n e r c i a l . Th i s de s i g n a t i o n al l o w s fo r a mi x of ho u s i n g ty p e s , no n r e s i d e n t i a l an d co m m e r c i a l us e s , ne i g h b o r h o o d re t a i l an d of ? c e us e s , pa r k s an d re c r e a t i o n ar e a s , an d ci v i c us e s at a de n s i t y of 5 to 29 dw e l l i n g un i t s pe r ac r e , co n s i s t e n t wi t h Pa s c o Mu n i c i p a l Co d e (P M C ) Ta b l e 25 . 2 1 5 . 0 1 5 . 9. 2 . Zo n i n g di s t r i c t s im p l e m e n t i n g th i s la n d us e de s i g n a t i o n in c l u d e R- l (L o w De n s i t y Re s i d e n t i a l ) , R— 2 (M e d i u m De n s i t y Re s i d e n t i a l ) , R— 3 , R- 4 , C- 1 , 0 (O ? i c e ) , an d Mi x e d Us e (f o r m e r l y kn o w n as “W a t e r l ‘ r o n t ” ) . En v i r o n m e n t a l De t e r m i n a t i o n : Th e Ci t y ha s de t e r m i n e d th i s pr o p o s a l to be ex e m p t un d e r Wa s h i n g t o n Ad m i n i s t r a t i v e Co d e 19 7 - 1 1 - 8 0 0 (6 ) La n d us e de c i s i o n s . Th a t de t e r m i n a t i o n ha s no t be e n ch a l l e n g e d an d is no t re v i e w e d in th i s pr o c e e d i n g . Ap p l i c a n t ’ s St a t e d In t e n t : 11. 1 . El i t e In v e s t m e n t Gr o u p LL C , on be h a l f of th e la n d o w n e r s , is re q u e s t i n g ap p r o v a l to re z o n e Pa r c e l No s . 11 6 1 4 0 0 4 9 (f r o m 01 to Mi x e d Us e ) an d 11 6 1 4 0 0 5 0 (f r o m R— 4 to Mi x e d Us e ) , to t a l i n g ap p r o x i m a t e l y 4. 4 9 ac r e s . 1 1. 2 . Wh i l e th e ex i s t i n g zo n i n g cl a s s i ? c a t i o n s ar e co n s i s t e n t wi t h th e Ci t y ’ s Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n de s i g n a t i o n , th e ap p l i c a n t is re q u e s t i n g th e Mi x e d Us e di s t r i c t to al l o w gr e a t e r ?e x i b i l i t y in si t e de s i g n an d pe r m i t t e d us e s . Th e Mi x e d Us e zo n i n g di s t r i c t ma y re d u c e ce r t a i n de v e l o p m e n t co n s t r a i n t s th a t co u l d ot h e r w i s e ap p l y un d e r th e cu r r e n t zo n i n g de s i g n a t i o n s . 11 . 3 . Th e ev e n t u a l de v e l o p m e n t pr o p o s a l is li k e l y to in c l u d e no t on l y hi g h e r de n s i t y re s i d e n t i a l us e s bu t al s o co m m e r c i a l us e s . Th e in t e n t is to de v e l o p bo t h pa r c e l s as on e mi x e d us e co n t i g u o u s si t e . Hi s t o r y : 12 . 1 . In 19 8 1 , th e su b j e c t pr o p e r t i e s we r e an n e x e d in t o th e Ci t y un d e r Or d i n a n c e No . 23 8 8 an d as s i g n e d R- T (R e s i d e n t i a l Tr a n s i t i o n ) zo n i n g pu r s u a n t to Re s o l u t i o n No . 13 9 6 . 12 . 3 . In 20 2 5 , Or d i n a n c e No . 47 5 2 re z o n e d Pa r c e l No . 11 6 1 4 0 0 5 0 fr o m C- 1 to R- 4 . 12 . 4 . Th e Si t e is un d e v e l o p e d an d is cu r r e n t l y ba r e gr o u n d . Zo n i n g Pe t i t i o n Re q u i r e m e n t s : PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 3 0 se t s fo r t h th e re q u i r e d co n t e n t s of a zo n e ch a n g e pe t i t i o n . Th e pe t i t i o n re c e i v e d in th i s ca s e ap p e a r s to be a ?l l a b l e fo r m fu m i s h e d to th e ap p l i c a n t by ZD 2 0 2 5 - 0 0 2 El i t e In v e s t m e n t Gr o u p LL C C~ 1 an d R4 to MU Pa g e 2 of 6 Page 105 of 266 Ci t y , th e co n t e n t s of wh i c h ar e si m i l a r bu t do no t ex a c t l y fo l l o w PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 3 0 . Th e st a f f re p o r t , ho w e v e r , pr o v i d e s am p l e su p p l e m e n t a t i o n to th e co n t e n t s of th e pe t i t i o n an d ad d r e s s e s al l th e re q u i r e m e n t s of PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 3 0 : 13 . 1 . Th e da t e th e ex i s t i n g zo n e be c a m e ef f e c t i v e : 13 . 1 . 1 . Pa r c e l No . 11 6 1 4 0 0 4 9 wa s as s i g n e d it s cu r r e n t zo n i n g de s i g n a t i o n in 20 0 3 . Pa r c e l No . 11 6 1 4 0 0 5 0 wa s as s i g n e d it s cu r r e n t zo n i n g de s i g n a t i o n on Ja n u a r y 12 , 20 2 5 . 13 . 2 . Th e ch a n g e d co n d i t i o n s , wh i c h ar e al l e g e d to wa r r a n t ot h e r or ad d i t i o n a l zo n i n g : 13 . 2 . 1 . Si n c e th e 20 0 3 zo n i n g de s i g n a t i o n wa s es t a b l i s h e d , th e su r r o u n d i n g ar e a ha s tr a n s i t i o n e d fr o m lo w a e n s i t y re s i d e n t i a l de v e l o p m e n t an d va c a n t ?e l d s to a mo r e ur b a n co m m e r c i a l en v i r o n m e n t , co n s i s t i n g of th e de v e l o p m e n t of co m m e r c i a l an d me d i c a l fa c i l i t i e s on ad j a c e n t pa r c e l s to th e ea s t , an d so u t h as we l l as mu n i c i p a l de v e l o p m e n t of a ?r e st a t i o n to th e no r t h . Th i s ev o l u t i o n in la n d us e pa t t e r n s re p r e s e n t s a ma t e r i a l ch a n g e in ci r c u m s t a n c e s . 13 .2 2 . Ad d i t i o n a l l y , th e ad v e n t of a un i q u e mi x e d - u s e de v e l o p m e n t co n c e p t th a t ta k e s ad v a n t a g e of th e ex i s t i n g de v e l o p m e n t pa t t e r n s , re q u i r e s an ad j u s t m e n t of th e zo n i n g de s i g n a t i o n s in or d e r fo r it to su c c e s s f u l l y mo v e fr o m co n c e p t to re a l i t y . 13 . 2 . 3 . Th e pr o p e r t y pr o p o s e d fo r th e re z o n e is lo c a t e d be t w e e n th r e e ro a d w a y s cl a s s i ? e d in th e Ci t y of Pa s c o Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n Sy s t e m s Ma s t e r Pl a n . Wr i g l e y Dr : to th e so u t h is cl a s s i ? e d as a ne i g h b o r h o o d co l l e c t o r ; Sa n d i ? t r Pk w y . to th e no r t h is cl a s s z ? e d as a ma j o r co l l e c t o r ; an d Ro a d 68 to th e ea s t is cl a s s i ? e d as a mi n o r ar t e r i a l . As su c h , a mi x e d - u s e de v e l o p m e n t co n c e p t is id e a l gi v e n th e ex i s t i n g tr a n s p o r t a t i o n sy s t e m ca p a c i t y . 13 . 3 . Fa c t s to ju s t i f y th e ch a n g e on th e ba s i s of ad v a n c i n g th e pu b l i c he a l t h , sa f e t y an d ge n e r a l we l f a r e : 13 . 3 . 1 . Th e pr o p o s e d re z o n e ad v a n c e s th e pu b l i c he a l t h , sa f e t y , an d ge n e r a l we l f a r e by im p l e m e n t i n g th e Ci t y Is Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n po l i c i e s fo r co o r d i n a t e d gr o w t h an d mi x e d - u s e de v e l o p m e n t . Th e Ci t y of Pa s c o is re q u i r e d un d e r st a t e la w to pl a n fo r an d ac c o m m o d a t e si g n i f i c a n t po p u l a t i o n gr o w t h . Th i s re z o n e su p p o r t s th a t re q u i r e m e n t by al l o w i n g a mi x of re s i d e n t i a l an d co m m e r c i a l us e s th a t pr o m o t e ho u s i n g di v e r s i t y , ec o n o m i c vi t a l i t y , an d e? i c i e n t la n d us e pa t t e r n s . 13 . 3 . 2 . By en c o u r a g i n g in t e g r a t e d de v e l o p m e n t , th e lo c a t i o n of th e re z o n e d pa r c e l s wo u l d o? e r wa l k a b l e ac c e s s to co m m e r c i a l an d me d i c a l se r v i c e s , be n e ? t i n g an y fu t u r e de v e l o p m e n t of th e pr o p e r t y . Ov e r a l l , th e re z o n e fu r t h e r s or d e r l y gr o w t h co n s i s t e n t wi t h th e Ci t y f s ad o p t e d vi s i o n an d lo n g - t e r m pl a n n i n g ob j e c t i v e s . 13 . 4 . Th e ef f e c t it wi l l ha v e on th e va l u e an d ch a r a c t e r of th e ad j a c e n t pr o p e r t y an d th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n : 13 . 4 . 1 . Th e pr o p o s e d re z o n e of on e re s i d e n t i a l l y zo n e d lo t an d on e co m m e r c i a l l y zo n e d lo t to a mi x e d - u s e de s i g n a t i o n is no t an t i c i p a t e d to ad v e r s e l y im p a c t th e va l u e or ch a r a c t e r of ad j a c e n t pr o p e r t i e s . Th e mi x e d - u s e zo n e al l o w s co n t i n u e d re s i d e n t i a l us e wh i l e ma i n t a i n i n g 13 . 4 . 2 . As su c h , th e re z o n e is co n s i s t e n t wi t h th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n an d is no t ex p e c t e d to ne g a t i v e l y a? e c t ad j a c e n t pr o p e r t y va l u e s or ne i g h b o r h o o d ch a r a c t e r : 13 . 5 . Th e ef f e c t on th e pr o p e r t y ow n e r or ow n e r s if th e re q u e s t is no t gr a n t e d : ZD 2 0 2 5 - 0 0 2 El i t e In v e s t m e n t Gr o u p LL C C- 1 an d R- 4 to MU Pa g e 3 of 6 Page 106 of 266 14 . 15 . 16 . 17 . 18 . 19 . 20 . 13 . 5 . 1 . If th e re z o n e re q u e s t is de n i e d , th e su b j e c t pr o p e r t y wo u l d re m a i n li m i t e d to de v e l o p m e n t un d e r th e ex i s t i n g zo n i n g cl a s s i ? c a t i o n s . Th e re s i d e n t i a l l y zo n e d po r t i o n wo u l d be re s t r i c t e d to re s i d e n t i a l de v e l o p m e n t , wh i l e th e co m m e r c i a l l y zo n e d po r t i o n co u l d pu r s u e mi x e d - u s e de v e l o p m e n t th r o u g h th e sp e c i a l pe r m i t pr o c e s s , su b j e c t to ad d i t i o n a l re v i e w cr i t e r i a . Th i s wo u l d re d u c e de v e l o p m e n t ?e x i b i l i t y an d ma y li m i t th e la n d ow n e r .’ s ab i l i t y to de v e l o p th e si t e in a co n t i g u o u s , co h e s i v e an d ec o n o m i c a l l y vi a b l e ma n n e r : De n i a l wo u l d ha m p e r th e pr o p e r t y 19 de v e l o p m e n t po t e n t i a l wh e n co m p a r e d to th e pr o p o s e d mi x e d - u s e de s i g n a t i o n . 13 . 6 . Th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n la n d us e de s i g n a t i o n fo r th e pr o p e r t y : 13 . 6 . 1 . Th e Ci t y of Pa s c o Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n de s i g n a t e s th e si t e s as Mi x e d Re s i d e n t i a l / C o m m e r c i a l . Th e pr o p o s e d Mi x e d - U s e zo n i n g de s i g n a t i o n is pe r m i t t e d in ac c o r d a n c e wi t h PM C 25 . 2 1 5 . 01 5 . 13 . 7 . Su c h ot h e r in f o r m a t i o n as th e He a r i n g Ex a m i n e r re q u i r e s : 13 . 7 . 1 . Th e pr o p o s e d re z o n e is co n s i s t e n t wi t h an d im p l e m e n t s th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n by al i g n i n g th e zo n i n g cl a s s i ? c a t i o n wi t h th e Ci t y s lo n g - r a n g e gr o w t h po l i c i e s . Th e pr o p o s a l al i g n s wi t h th e Ci t y s ho u s i n g ca p a c i t y an d ec o n o m i c vi t a l i t y ob j e c t i v e s an d in t r o d u c e s ?e x i b i l i t y to th e si t e to pr o m o t e de v e l o p m e n t . 13 . 7 . 2 . Th e re z o n e sa t i s ? e s th e re q u i r e m e n t s of Wa s h i n g t o n s Gr o w t h Ma n a g e m e n t Ac t by ma i n t a i n i n g co n s i s t e n c y be t w e e n th e Ci t y s Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n an d zo n i n g di s t r i c t s . Pu r s u a n t to PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 4 0 , Pu b l i c no t i c e fo r th i s he a r i n g wa s ma i l e d to pr o p e r t y ow n e r s wi t h i n 30 0 fe e t of th e bo u n d a r i e s of th e pr o p o s a l on Fe b r u a r y 25 , 20 2 6 , in co m p l i a n c e wi t h th i s re q u i r e m e n t . Pu r s u a n t to PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 4 0 , Pu b l i c no t i c e fo r th i s he a r i n g wa s pu b l i s h e d in th e Tr i - C i t y He r a l d on Fe b r u a r y 25 , 20 2 6 , in co m p l i a n c e wi t h th i s re q u i r e m e n t . An op e n re c o r d pu b l i c he a r i n g wa s he l d , af t e r le g a l no t i c e , on Ma r c h 11 , 20 2 6 . Ap p e a r i n g an d te s t i f y i n g on be h a l f of th e Ap p l i c a n t wa s Ru s s e l l Ga u l , 40 0 Co l u m b i a Po i n t Dr . St e . 10 1 8 , Ri c h l a n d , Wa s h i n g t o n . Mr . Ga u l te s t i ? e d th a t he ha d re v i e w e d th e st a f f re p o r t pr i o r to th e he a r i n g ; be ag r e e d wi t h th e fa c t u a l re p r e s e n t a t i o n s th e r e i n . No me m b e r s of th e pu b l i c ap p e a r e d to te s t i f y fo r or ag a i n s t th e pr o p o s a l . Th e fo l l o w i n g ex h i b i t s we r e ad m i t t e d in t o th e re c o r d : 19 . 1 . Ex . A Ma p s 19 . 2 . Ex . B Ap p l i c a t i o n 19 . 3 . Ex . C Pu b l i c No t i c e 19 . 4 . Ex . D St a f f Re p o r t PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 6 0 FI N D I N G S : 20 . 1 . Th e pr o p o s a l is in ac c o r d wi t h th e go a l s an d po l i c i e s of th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n . Re s i d e n t i a l / C o m m e r c i a l . Th e pr o p o s e d mi x e d - u s e re z o n e is co n s i s t e n t wi t h th i s La n d Us e Ma p de s i g n a t i o n an d Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n Go a l LU - S Ma i n t a i n a br o a d ra n g e of re s i d e n t i a l la n d us e de s i g n a t i o n s to ac c o m m o d a t e a va r i e t y of li f e s t y l e s an d ho u s i n g op p o r t u n i t i e s . 20 . 1 . 2 . Th e pr o p o s a l su p p o r t s Po l i c y LU - 4 - B , en c o u r a g i n g in ? l l an d hi g h e r de n s i t y us e s wi t h i n pr o x i m i t y to ma j o r tr a v e l co n i d o r s an d pu b l i c tr a n s p o r t a t i o n se r v i c e ar e a s . ZD 2 0 2 5 - 0 0 2 El i t e In v e s t m e n t Gr o u p LL C C- 1 an d R4 to MU Pa g e 4 of 6 Page 107 of 266 20 . 1 . 3 . Th e pr o p o s a l su p p o r t s Po l i c y LU — 4 — C , en c o u r a g i n g th e de v e l o p m e n t of wa l k a b l e co m m u n i t i e s by in c r e a s i n g mi x e d - u s e (c o m m e r c i a l / r e s i d e n t i a l ) de v e l o p m e n t s th a t pr o v i d e ho u s e h o l d s wi t h ne i g h b o r h o o d an d co m m e r c i a l sh o p p i n g op p o r t u n i t i e s . 20 . 1 . 4 . Th e pr o p o s a l su p p o r t s Po l i c y LU - 4 - D , de s i g n a t i n g ar e a s fo r hi g h e r de n s i t y re s i d e n t i a l de v e l o p m e n t s wh e r e ut i l i t i e s an d tr a n s p o r t a t i o n fa c i l i t i e s en a b l e ef ? c i e n t us e of ca p i t a l re s o u r c e s . 20 . 1 . 5 . Th e pr o p o s a l su p p o r t s Po l i c y LU — 6 - A , en c o u r a g i n g co m m e r c i a l an d hi g h e r - d e n s i t y re s i d e n t i a l us e s al o n g ma j o r co r r i d o r s an d le v e r a g e in f r a s t r u c t u r e av a i l a b i l i t y . 20 . 2 . Th e ef f e c t of th e pr o p o s a l on th e im m e d i a t e vi c i n i t y wi l l no t be ma t e r i a l l y de t r i m e n t a l . 20 . 2 . 1 . Th e pa r c e l s ar e lo c a t e d in an ar e a wh e r e re s i d e n t i a l an d co m m e r c i a l us e s al r e a d y ex i s t in pr o x i m i t y to ea c h ot h e r , di v i d e d by a lo c a l ac c e s s ro a d . Th e mi x e d - u s e de s i g n a t i o n al l o w s fo r gr e a t e r re s i d e n t i a l de v e l o p m e n t on th e si t e wh i l e pe r m i t t i n g li m i t e d co m m e r c i a l ac t i v i t y co n s i s t e n t wi t h su r r o u n d i n g de v e l o p m e n t pa t t e r n s . 20 . 2 . 2 . As a tr a n s i t i o n a l ar e a be t w e e n re s i d e n t i a l an d co m m e r c i a l di s t r i c t s , th e mi x e d - u s e zo n e pr o v i d e s sp a c e fo r co m p a t i b l e , in t e g r a t e d us e s th a t re d u c e th e sh a r p se p a r a t i o n be t w e e n th e tw o . It s ra n g e of pe r m i t t e d us e s an d de v e l o p m e n t st a n d a r d s ar e de s i g n e d to le s s e n im p a c t s re l a t e d to bu i l d i n g sc a l e , ac t i v i t y in t e n s i t y , tr a ? i c , an d si t e de s i g n . 20 . 2 . 3 . Gi v e n th e le v e l s of de v e l o p m e n t on su r r o u n d i n g pr o p e r t i e s an d th e re g u l a t o r y co n t r o l s th a t ap p l y to mi x e d - u s e de v e l o p m e n t , th e pr o p o s a l is no t an t i c i p a t e d to ad v e r s e l y af f e c t th e va l u e , us e , or ch a r a c t e r of ad j a c e n t pr o p e r t i e s . Th e r e f o r e , th e re z o n e wo u l d no t re s u l t in a ma t e r i a l l y de t r i m e n t a l ef f e c t on th e im m e d i a t e vi c i n i t y . 20 . 3 . Th e r e is me r i t an d va l u e in th e pr o p o s a l fo r th e co m m u n i t y as a wh o l e . 20 . 3 . 1 . Th e pr o p o s e d re z o n e im p l e m e n t s th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n ’ s Mi x e d Re s i d e n t i a l / Co m m e r c i a l de s i g n a t i o n . . 20 . 3 . 2 . Th e pr o p o s a l su p p o r t s a mo r e ef ? c i e n t an d in t e g r a t e d la n d us e pa t t e r n , by al l o w i n g op p o r t u n i t i e s fo r re s i d e n t i a l an d co m m e r c i a l de v e l o p m e n t wi t h i n th e sa m e ar e a . By en c o u r a g i n g mi x e d ~ u s e de v e l o p m e n t , th e re z o n e ad v a n c e s ho u s i n g av a i l a b i l i t y , pr o m o t e s ec o n o m i c ac t i v i t y , an d su p p o r t s wa l k a b l e ac c e s s to su r r o u n d i n g se r v i c e s . 20 . 4 . No co n d i t i o n s sh o u l d be im p o s e d fo r th e mi t i g a t i o n of si g n i ? c a n t ad v e r s e im p a c t s fr o m th e pr o p o s a l . 20 . 4 . 1 . No co n d i t i o n s ar e ne c e s s a r y at th e re z o n e st a g e . Th e pr o p o s e d zo n i n g cl a s s i ? c a t i o n es t a b l i s h e s a re g u l a t o r y fr a m e w o r k bu t do e s no t au t h o r i z e sp e c i ? c de v e l o p m e n t . An y fu t u r e de v e l o p m e n t of th e si t e s wi l l be su b j e c t to th e ap p l i c a b l e pr o v i s i o n s of th e Pa s c o Mu n i c i p a l Co d e an d th e Ci t y of Pa s c o De s i g n an d Co n s t r u c t i o n St a n d a r d s . 20 . 5 . No co n c o m i t a n t ag r e e m e n t sh o u l d be en t e r e d be t w e e n th e Ci t y an d th e pe t i t i o n e r . 20 . 5 . 1 . A co n c o m i t a n t ag r e e m e n t is no t ne c e s s a r y fo r th i s pr o p o s a l . Th e re q u e s t e d re z o n i n g re g u l a t i o n s ar e wa r r a n t e d . Ac c o r d i n g l y , no fu r t h e r co m m i t m e n t s or ag r e e m e n t s ar e re q u i r e d . 21 . Th e Ci t y of Pa s c o He a r i n g Ex a m i n e r co n s i d e r e d al l ev i d e n c e wi t h i n th e re c o r d in re n d e r i n g th i s de c i s i o n . ZD 2 0 2 5 — 0 0 2 El i t e In v e s t m e n t Gr o u p LL C C- 1 an d R— 4 to MU Pa g e 5 of 6 Page 108 of 266 22 . An y Co n c l u s i o n of La w th a t is mo r e co r r e c t l y a Fi n d i n g of Fa c t is he r e b y in c o r p o r a t e d as su c h by th i s re f e r e n c e . II . RE C O M I V I E N D E D CO N C L U S I O N S OF LA W 1. Th e He a r i n g Ex a m i n e r ha s be e n gr a n t e d th e au t h o r i t y to re n d e r a re c o m m e n d a t i o n to ap p r o v e , ap p r o v e wi t h mo d i ? c a t i o n s an d / o r co n d i t i o n s , or re j e c t th e pe t i t i o n ba s e d on it s ?n d i n g s an d co n c l u s i o n s . PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 6 0 ( 2 ) . 2. Th i s re c o m m e n d a t i o n sh a l l be fo r w a r d e d to th e Ci t y Co u n c i l at a re g u l a r bu s i n e s s me e t i n g th e r e o f . PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 6 0 ( 2 ) . 3. Th e pr o p o s e d zo n e ch a n g e is co n s i s t e n t wi t h th e Pa s c o Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n an d Pa s c o Mu n i c i p a l Co d e . 4. An y Fi n d i n g of Fa c t th a t is mo r e co r r e c t l y a Co n c l u s i o n of La w is he r e b y in c o r p o r a t e d as su c h by th i s re f e r e n c e . II I . RE C O M M E N D E D DE C I S I O N Ba s e d on th e ab o v e Fi n d i n g s of Fa c t an d Co n c l u s i o n s of La w , Z 20 2 6 - 0 0 1 is he r e b y re c o m m e n d e d fo r AP P R O V A L . Da t e d th i s 20 da y of M a r c h , 20 2 6 CI T Y OF PA S C O HE A R I N G EX A M I N E R , PR O TE M J D. Ey e s t o n e Th i s re c o m m e n d a t i o n is su b j e c t to a ti m e l y ?l e d ap p e a l pu r s u a n t to PM C 25 21 0 . 0 7 0 ZD 2 0 2 5 - 0 0 2 El i t e In v e s t m e n t Gr o u p LL C 01 an d R— 4 to MU Pa g e 6 of 6 Page 109 of 266 Proposed Zoning Map 133964rer2n25.s<715AM -_I mmwm.‘m M (”WWW WM m ‘k ,. my»WM,”Wrmm. U ““1 M2 w a mums n 2 MW.WWW mm.d -a ,w.WWW W.o v»w m "m0 u 7 M?huul D?m'y uwu mm»a w”'V '"'“""‘"'”"’‘M'"“W""""‘ c ,mam.”stm Pa g e 1 1 0 o f 2 6 6 Pasco City Council April 27, 2026 Regular Workshop Pa g e 1 1 1 o f 2 6 6 Introduction of Ordinance-Elite Investment LLC C-1 & R-4 to MU Rezone-Z 2026-001 April 27, 2026 Pasco City Council Pa g e 1 1 2 o f 2 6 6 Quasi-Judicial Action PMC Comp Plan Map Proposed City Zoning Map 01 02 03 04 Pa g e 1 1 3 o f 2 6 6 How Quasi-Judicial Decisions Are Handled in Pasco Quasi-Judicial Process Overview (Why This Workshop) •Quasi-judicial actions apply existing law to a specific property and require a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner •The Hearing Examiner conducts the hearing, creates the official record, and issues a written recommendation with findings and conclusions •From issuance of the recommendation until final Council action, ex parte communication is prohibited; Council may rely only on the hearing record •A 10-day appeal period follows the recommendation; if appealed—or if Council determines further review is needed—a closed record hearing is required with at least 14 days’ notice •Closed record hearings allow no new evidence and limit participation to summaries from prior commenters •At the conclusion, City Council must enter findings and either approve (with or without modification), enter a concomitant agreement, or deny the request •Staff and the City Attorney are available to assist Council and ensure the proper process is followed Pa g e 1 1 4 o f 2 6 6 Rezone -PMC Requirements for zoning petition (PMC 25.210.030): •A rezone petition must identify when the current zoning took effect, explain the changed conditions and justification for therequest, address impacts on adjacent properties and the Comprehensive Plan, note the property’s Comprehensive Plan designation, state the effect on the owner if denied, and include any additional information required by the Hearing Examiner. Hearing Examiner –Findings and recommendations (PMC 25.210.060): •After an open record hearing on a rezone petition, the Hearing Examiner must issue findings and conclusions addressing whether the proposal aligns with the Comprehensive Plan, avoids material detriment to the vicinity, provides community benefit, requires conditions to mitigate impacts, and/or necessitates a concomitant agreement with the City. Process Milestones: •Public Hearing held: March 11, 2026 •Hearing Examiner Recommendation March 20, 2026: Approval of MU Zoning City Council Consideration: 1) Approve the recommended rezoning (with or without modifications) 2) Enter into a Concomitant Agreement (PMC 25.210.100) 3) Deny the proposed rezone Pa g e 1 1 5 o f 2 6 6 Pa g e 1 1 6 o f 2 6 6 Pa g e 1 1 7 o f 2 6 6 Mixed Use Pa g e 1 1 8 o f 2 6 6 Questions? Thank you! Pa g e 1 1 9 o f 2 6 6 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 2, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/27/26 FROM: Haylie Matson, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Q - Ordinance - Introduction of Quasi Judicial Item - Amending the Zoning Classification of certain real property located north of E Spokane Dr., south of E Salt Lake St., west of N Oregon Ave., east BNSF Railroad, in Pasco, Franklin County, Washington from C-3 (General Business) staff minute (5 I-1 (Light to Industrial)(Z2026-002) presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Ordinance Hearing Examiner Decision Proposed Zoning Map Parcel Consolidation Documents Workshop PowerPoint II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Informational Presentation III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background: On February 2nd, 2026, Knutzen Engineering, with written authorization from Chavoshi LLC, submitted an application to rezone Parcel Nos. 113493122, 113493140, 113493159, 113493131. The subject properties were annexed into the City in 1963 and were developed as a car/truck wash in 1992. Page 120 of 266 The property owners are currently in the process of combining Parcel Nos. 113493131 & 113493159, the easternmost parcels. See Exhibit C. On March 11, 2026, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing to review the request to rezone the parcels from C-3 (General Business) to I-1 (Light Industrial), as illustrated on the proposed zoning map in the PowerPoint (Exhibit B). In accordance with PMC Subsection 25.210.060(2), the Hearing Examiner recommended approval of the rezone on March 23, 2026, finding it consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and forwarded the recommendation to the City Council for final consideration. No appeals of this recommendation have been received. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: North: C-3 General Business/ Bus Service and Sales East: C-3 General Business/ Steel Recycling South: C-3 General Business/ Fencing Contractor’s Yard & Concrete Materials Supplier West: I-1 Light Industrial/ Bare ground & Industrial Equipment Rental Impact (other than fiscal): The Pasco City Council has identified Economic Vitality as a key priority. The property in question was developed in 1992 as a car/ truck wash, however as economic trends have shifted, the landowner has identified a use that is compatible with the I-1 zone and wishes to pursue redevelopment of this site in an industrial context. Rezoning the property from C-3 to I-1 would provide the owners with greater flexibility to develop the property consistent with their goals and would be in keeping with the underlying Land Use Designation. V. DISCUSSION: Conclusion & Recommendation: Staff and the Hearing Examiner find that the requested rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal supports orderly growth, aligns with long-term development objectives, and provides a framework for future redevelopment while ensuring that any future projects will be reviewed for code compliance and environmental impact. Accordingly, both Staff and the Hearing Examiner recommend that the City Council approve the requested rezone through the associated Ordinance. Constraints (Time or other considerations): The city is required to issue a decision within 120 days from date of complete application in accord with Title 4 of the PMC. The applicant was issued a Notice of Complete Application on February 25, 2026. Although the statutory Page 121 of 266 deadline has not yet arrived, staff respectfully recommends that the City Council proceed with a timely review and processing of the application to ensure orderly consideration and to serve the best interests of the community. Staff Analysis & Hearing Examiner Findings: Following the conclusion of an open record hearing on the properties rezone petition, the Hearing Examiner issued findings and conclusions based on the record, pursuant to PMC Subsection 25.210.060(1)(a) through (e), applying the initial review criteria set forth in PMC Section 25.210.030. The findings and conclusions are as follows: (a) The proposal is in accord with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Industrial. The requested zoning is consistent with this designation and supports policies promoting industrial development, appropriate location of development, and potential industrial growth. (b) The effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity will be materially detrimental Existing development patterns meet the minimum qualifications of their respective industrial and commercial zones. Future development will be required to comply with City regulations for buffering, traffic, and setbacks, ensuring that potential impacts are minimized. (c) There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole Applying zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan creates opportunities for industrial and business redevelopment, economic growth, and supports the long-term goals of the community, including ensuring the appropriate location, and development of Industrial uses. The proposal advances the City’s long- term goals. (d) Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the proposal No conditions are necessary as part of this rezone request. The application, as well as any future development, will be subject to the applicable provisions of the PMC and the City of Pasco Design and Construction Standards. (e) A concomitant agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and, if so, the terms and condition of such an agreement A concomitant agreement is not necessary for this proposal. The requested rezoning complies with all applicable City standards and requirements without the need for additional terms or conditions beyond those already provided in the PMC and adopted development regulations. Page 122 of 266 Next Steps: If the Ordinance is adopted, the City Clerk’s Office will record it with the Franklin County Auditor, and staff will issue a Notice of Decision to all affected parties. Alternatives: In accordance with PMC Section 25.210.080, if the City Council determines by majority vote that further review is warranted, a closed record hearing is required, and at least 14 days’ notice shall be given prior to the hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Council may approve the reclassification with or without modifications, enter into a concomitant agreement with the petitioner, or deny the reclassification. The Council may adopt the Hearing Examiner’s findings and conclusions or formulate alternative findings to support its decision to approve, modify, or deny the application. Page 123 of 266 Ordinance - Rezone Z2026-002- 1 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: City of Pasco, Washington WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Pasco, Washington Attn: City Clerk 525 North 3rd Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF E SPOKANE ST., SOUTH OF E SALT LAKE ST., WEST N OREGON AVE., AND EAST OF THE BNSF RAILROAD, IN PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON FROM C-3 (GENERAL BUSINESS) TO I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL). PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Knutzen Engineering the petitioner, on behalf of Chavoshi, LLC, seeks to rezone Parcel Nos. 113493131, 113493159, 113493140, 113493122, 1010 N Oregon Ave., Pasco, Washington; and WHEREAS, a complete and adequate petition for change of zoning classification meeting the requirements of Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Section 25.210.030 was received by the City of Pasco (City) and, after notice was issued under PMC Section 25.210.040, an open record hearing was conducted by the Pasco Hearing Examiner upon such petition on March 11, 2026; and WHEREAS, based upon substantial evidence and demonstration of the Petitioner that: (a) the proposal is in accord with the goals and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan; (b) the effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity is not materially detrimental; (c) there is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole; (d) any impacts of the rezone application and anticipated development will be mitigated by the regulations and requirements of the Pasco Municipal Code and the City of Pasco Design and Constructions Standards; (e) a concomitant agreement is not required under these circumstances; and (f) the proposal is consistent with and satisfies all criteria in PMC Section 25.210.060; the Hearing Examiner has recommended to approve the rezone, which findings and recommendation are hereby adopted by the City Council, and the Hearing Examiner Report is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit A. Page 124 of 266 Ordinance - Rezone Z2026-002- 2 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Pasco, Washington, and the Zoning Map, accompanying and being part of said Ordinance shall be and hereby is changed from C-3 (GENERAL BUSINESS) to I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) for the real property as shown in the Exhibit B attached hereto and described as follows: Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8, Block 12, FREY’S ADDITION TO PASCO, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume B of Plats, Page 16, records of Franklin County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH portion of Duluth Street adjacent thereto, as vacated under City of Pasco Ordinance No. 2894 and recorded under Auditor’s file No. 492598; AND TOGETHER WITH portion of the North/South alley adjacent thereto, as vacated under City of Pasco Ordinance No. 3464 and recorded under Auditor’s File No. 1670982. AND Lots 9,10,11, and 12, Block 12, FREY’S ADDITION TO PASCO, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume B of Plats, Page 16, records of Franklin County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH portion of Duluth Street adjacent thereto, as vacated under City of Pasco Ordinance No. 2894 and recorded under Auditor’s File No. 492598; AND TOGETHER WITH portion of the North/South alley adjacent thereto, as vacated under City of Pasco Ordinance No. 3464 and recorded under Auditor’s File No. 1670982 AND Lots 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24, Block 12, FREY’S ADDITION TO PASCO, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume B of Plats, Page 16, records of Franklin County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH portion of the North/South alley adjacent thereto, as vacated under City of Pasco Ordinance No. 3464 and recorded under Auditor’s File No. 1670982 EXCEPT that portion conveyed to City of Pasco by deed recorded June 15, 2017 under Auditor’s File No. 1863380. Tax Parcel Number(s): 113493131, 113493122, 113493140, 113493159 . Page 125 of 266 Ordinance - Rezone Z2026-002- 3 Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this ordinance. Section 3. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including scrivener’s errors or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of _____, 202_. Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Krystle Shanks Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC Deputy City Clerk City Attorney Published: _____________________________ Page 126 of 266 CI T Y OF PA S C O LA N D US E HE A R I N G EX A M I N E R IN TH E MA T T E R OF ) RE C O M M E N D E D FI N D I N G S OF ) FA C T , RE C O M M E N D E D Z 20 2 6 - 0 0 2 ) CO N C L U S I O N S OF LA W , AN D Ch a v o s h i , LL C ) RE C O M M E N D E D DE C I S I O N TH I S MA T T E R ha v i n g co m e on fo r he a r i n g in fr o n t of th e Ci t y of Pa s c o He a r i n g Ex a m i n e r on Ma r c h 11 , 20 2 6 , th e He a r i n g Ex a m i n e r ha v i n g ta k e n ev i d e n c e he r e b y su b m i t s th e fo l l o w i n g Re c o m m e n d e d Fi n d i n g s of Fa c t , Re c o m m e n d e d Co n c l u s i o n s of La w , an d Re c o m m e n d e d De c i s i o n as fo l l o w s : 1. AP P L I C A N T : 99 3 3 8. 2. OW N E R : 3. RE Q U E S T : 4. TI M E L I N E: I. RE C O M M E N D E D FI N D I N G S OF FA C T Pa u l Kn u t z e n , Kn u t z e n En g i n e e r i n g , 54 0 1 Ri d g e l i n e Dr St e 16 0 , Ke n n e w i c k , WA Sa m Ch a v o s h i , Ch a v o s h i LL C , PO Bo x 31 7 0 , Pa s c o , WA 99 3 0 2 . Re z o n e C- 3 (R e t a i l Bu s i n e s s ) to I— 1 (L i g h t In d u s t r i a l ) . Fe b r u a r y 2, 20 2 6 Ap p l i c a t i o n Su b m i t t e d . Fe b r u a r y 25 , 20 2 6 Ap p l i c a t i o n De e m e d Co m p l e t e . Fe b r u a r y 25 , 20 2 6 Ap p l i c a t i o n No t i c e d fo r Pu b l i c He a r i n g to Pr o p e r t y Ow n e r s wi t h i n 30 0 ’ . Fe b r u a r y 25 , 20 2 6 Ap p l i c a t i o n No t i c e d fo r Pu b l i c He a r i n g to th e Tr i - C i t y He r a l d . Ma r c h 4, 20 2 6 Pu b l i c He a r i n g St a f f Re p o r t Pu b l i s h e d 5. PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : 5. 1 . Pa r c e l No s . : 11 3 4 9 3 1 2 2 , 11 3 4 9 3 1 4 0 , 11 3 4 9 3 1 5 9 , 11 3 4 9 3 1 3 1 . 5. 2 . Le g a l : LO T S 1, 9, 13 , an d 19 , BL O C K 12 , FR E Y S AD D I T I O N , re s p e c t i v e l y . 5. 3 . Pr o p e r t y Si z e : Ap p r o x i m a t e l y 2. 3 7 ac r e s (1 0 3 , 2 5 8 . 1 6 sq u a r e fe e t ) . 5. 4 . Ge n e r a l Lo c a t i o n : Th e su b j e c t pr o p e r t y is ad d r e s s e d as 10 1 0 N Or e g o n Av e . Pa s c o , WA 99 3 0 1 , ge n e r a l l y we s t of N Or e g o n Av e . , so u t h of E Sa l t La k e St . , no r t h of E Sp o k a n e St . , an d ea s t of th e 6. AC C E S S : Th e ha s ac c e s s fr o m N Or e g o n Av e . an d E Sa l t La k e St . 7. UT I L I T I E S : Mu n i c i p a l se w e r is av a i l a b l e in th e al l e y to th e we s t th e su b j e c t pr o p e r t y an d wi t h i n E Sa l t La k e St . to th e no r t h . Mu n i c i p a l wa t e r is av a i l a b l e wi t h i n N Or e g o n Av e . ea s t of th e si t e an d wi t h i n E Sa l t La k e St . to th e no r t h of th e pr o p e r t y . Z 20 2 6 - 0 0 2 Ch a v o s h i , LL C Pa g e 1 of 6 Page 127 of 266 8. LA N D US E AN D ZO N I N G : Th e si t e is cu r r e n t l y zo n e d C- 3 , an d th e ap p l i c a n t is re q u e s t i n g a re z o n e to L] . Su r r o u n d i n g pr o p e r t i e s ar e zo n e d an d de v e l o p e d as fo l l o w s : 8. 1 . No r t h : C - 3 Ge n e r a l Bu s i n e s s / Bu s Se r v i c e an d Sa l e s 8. 2 . Ea s t : C- 3 Ge n e r a l Bu s i n e s s / St e e l Re c y c l i n g 8. 3 . So u t h : C- 3 Ge n e r a l Bu s i n e s s / Fe n c i n g Co n t r a c t o r ’ s Ya r d & Co n c r e t e Ma t e r i a l s Su p p l i e r 8. 4 . We s t : I- 1 Li g h t In d u s t r i a l / Ba r e gr o u n d & In d u s t r i a l Eq u i p m e n t Re n t a l 9. CO M P R E H E N S I V E PL A N : Th e Ci t y ’ s Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n de s i g n a t e s th e si t e as In d u s t r i a l , wh i c h su p p o r t s Ma n u f a c t u r i n g , fo o d pr o c e s s i n g , st o r a g e an d wh o l e s a l e di s t r i b u t i o n of eq u i p m e n t an d pr o d u c t s , ha z a r d o u s ma t e r i a l st o r a g e , an d tr a n s p o r t a t i o n re l a t e d fa c i l i t i e s . Pe r m i t t e d zo n i n g de s i g n a t i o n s wi t h i n th i s la n d us e ca t e g o r y in c l u d e I- 1 (L i g h t In d u s t r i a l ) , I- 2 (M e d i u m In d u s t r i a l ) , & I— 3 (H e a v y In d u s t r i a l ) . 10 . EN V I R O N M E N T A L DE T E R M I N A T I O N : Th e Ci t y ha s de t e r m i n e d th i s pr o p o s a l to be ex e m p t un d e r Wa s h i n g t o n Ad m i n i s t r a t i v e Co d e 19 7 — 1 1 - 8 0 0 (6 ) La n d us e de c i s i o n s . (c ) Wh e r e an ex e m p t pr o j e c t re q u i r e s a re z o n e , th e re z o n e is ex e m p t on l y if : (i ) Th e pr o j e c t is in an ur b a n gr o w t h ar e a in a ci t y or co u n t y pl a n n i n g un d e r RC W 36 . 7 0 A . 0 4 0 ; (i i ) Th e pr o p o s e d re z o n e is co n s i s t e n t wi t h an d do e s no t re q u i r e an am e n d m e n t to th e co m p r e h e n s i v e pl a n ; an d (i i i ) Th e ap p l i c a b l e co m p r e h e n s i v e pl a n wa s pr e v i o u s l y su b j e c t e d to en v i r o n m e n t a l re v i e w an d an a l y s i s th r o u g h an EI S un d e r th e re q u i r e m e n t s of th i s ch a p t e r pr i o r to ad o p t i o n ; an d th e EI S ad e q u a t e l y ad d r e s s e d th e en v i r o n m e n t a l im p a c t s of th e re z o n e . No fu r t h e r Wa s h i n g t o n St a t e En v i r o n m e n t a l Po l i c y Ac t (S E P A ) re v i e w is re q u i r e d fo r th i s pr o p o s a l . 1 1. HI S T O R Y : 11 . 1 . In Se p t e m b e r 20 2 0 , a No n - P r o j e c t En v i r o n m e n t a l Im p a c t St a t e m e n t (E I S ) wa s co m p l e t e d fo r th e Ci t y ’ s Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n . Th e EI S id e n t i ? e d 7, 7 6 8 . 4 3 ac r e s of In d u s t r i a l la n d wi t h i n Pa s c o ci t y li m i t s . Al t e r n a t i v e 3, wh i c h th e ci t y ch o s e to pu r s u e , “p r o p o s e s to al l o w de v e l o p m e n t to oc c u r wi t h i n cu r r e n t l y un d e v e l o p e d or in ? l l ar e a s of th e ci t y an d in sm a l l e r UG A ar e a co m p a r e d to Al t e r n a t i v e 2” . 11 . 2 . Th e pr o p e r t y wa s co u n t e d in th e EI S as it wa s an n e x e d in t o th e Ci t y of Pa s c o in 19 6 3 th r o u g h Or d i n a n c e #1 0 7 8 . 11 . 3 . Th e pr o p e r t y wa s de v e l o p e d as a ca r wa s h in 19 9 2 . 12 . PL A N N I N G ST A F F AN A L Y S I S : 12 . 1 . Th e ex i s t i n g C- 3 zo n i n g is no t co n s i s t e n t wi t h th e Ci t y ’ s Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n . Ap p r o v a l of th e re q u e s t e d re z o n e wo u l d br i n g th e pr o p e r t y in t o co n f o r m a n c e wi t h th e ad o p t e d Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n la n d us e de s i g n a t i o n . in d u s t r i a l de v e l o p m e n t of se v e r a l lo t s wi t h i n ci t y li m i t s . 13 . An op e n re c o r d pu b l i c he a r i n g wa s he l d , af t e r le g a l no t i c e , on Ma r c h 11 , 20 2 6 . 14 . Th e ap p l i c a n t di d no t ap p e a r no r se n d an ag e n t fo r th e pu b l i c he a r i n g . 15 . No me m b e r s of th e pu b l i c at t e n d e d th e he a r i n g to sp e a k fo r or ag a i n s t th e pr o p o s a l . Z 20 2 6 - 0 0 2 Ch a v o s h i , LL C Pa g e 2 of 6 Page 128 of 266 16 . Th e fo l l o w i n g ex h i b i t s we r e ad m i t t e d in t o th e re c o r d : 16 . 1 . Ex . A St a f f Re p o r t ; 16 . 2 . Ex . B Re m a i n d e r of Pl a n n i n g St a f f Fi l e . 17 . ZO N I N G PE T I T I O N RE Q U I R E M E N T S : PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 3 0 se t s fo r t h th e re q u i r e d co n t e n t s of a zo n e ch a n g e pe t i t i o n . Th e pe t i t i o n re c e i v e d in th i s ca s e ap p e a r s to be a fi l l a b l e fo r m fu r n i s h e d to th e ap p l i c a n t by Ci t y , th e co n t e n t s of wh i c h ar e si m i l a r bu t do no t ex a c t l y fo l l o w PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 3 0 . Th e st a f f re p o r t , ho w e v e r , pr o v i d e s am p l e su p p l e m e n t a t i o n to th e co n t e n t s of th e pe t i t i o n an d ad d r e s s e s al l th e re q u i r e m e n t s of PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 3 0 : 17 . 1 . Th e da t e th e ex i s t i n g zo n e be c a m e ef f e c t i v e : 17 . 1 . 1 . Th e pr o p e r t y ha s be e n zo n e d co m m e r c i a l l y si n c e at le a s t 19 9 2 ; th e pr o p e r t y wa s an n e x e d in t o th e ci t y in 1/ 1 5 / 1 9 6 3 th r o u g h or d i n a n c e #1 0 7 8 . 17 . 2 . Th e ch a n g e d co n d i t i o n s , wh i c h ar e al l e g e d to wa r r a n t ot h e r or ad d i t i o n a l zo n i n g : 17 . 2 . 1 . Th e ap p l i c a n t st a t e s “T he re z o n e is ne c e s s a r y fo r th e pr o p o s e d pr o j e c t . Th e re z o n e wi l l al s o al i g n wi t h th e cu r r e n t co m p r e h e n s i v e pl a n de s i g n a t i o n of ”I n d u s t r i a l th e cu r r e n t zo n e C— 3 is a no n - c o n f o r m i n g zo n e fo r th a t la n d us e . Th e ap p l i c a n t ha s me t wi t h ci t y st a ? f in an o? i c i a l p r e - a p p l i c a t i o n me e t i n g , ab o u t ch a n g i n g th e us e of th e pr o p e r t y fr o m a ca r wa s h to a so i l te s t i n g co m p a n y . To be t t e r al i g n wi t h th e Ci t y i s Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n an d su p p o r t fu t u r e in t e n d e d de v e l o p m e n t , th e ap p l i c a n t is re q u e s t i n g a re z o n e fr o m th e cu r r e n t C— 3 de s i g n a t i o n . Th e ex i s t i n g C— 3 zo n e is in t e n d e d as a co m m e r c i a l di s t r i c t an d do e s no t al l o w de v e l o p m e n t co n s i s t e n t wi t h th e la n d us e st a n d a r d s an d de n s i t y ob j e c t i v e s of th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n wh i c h de s i g n a t e s th e pr o p e r t y as In d u s t r i a l . 17 . 3 . Fa c t s to ju s t i f y th e ch a n g e on th e ba s i s of ad v a n c i n g th e pu b l i c he a l t h , sa f e t y an d ge n e r a l we l f a r e : 17 . 3 . 1 . Th e ex i s t i n g C- 3 zo n i n g do e s no t al i g n wi t h th e ad o p t e d Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n la n d us e de s i g n a t i o n , li m i t i n g th e pr o p e r t y is ab i l i t y to de v e l o p in a ma n n e r th a t pr o m o t e s pu b l i c he a l t h , sa f e t y , an d ge n e r a l we l f a r e . 17 . 3 . 2 . Th e pr o p o s e d 1- 1 zo n i n g wo u l d br i n g th e pr o p e r t y in t o co n f o r m a n c e wi t h th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n , fa c i l i t a t i n g or d e r l y , e? c i e n t in d u s t r i a l de v e l o p m e n t th a t is co m p a t i b l e wi t h su r r o u n d i n g us e s . Th e re z o n e wo u l d su p p o r t th e fo l l o w i n g se c t i o n s of th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e pl a n : 1 7. 3. 2. 1. Go a l LU - 6 En c o u r a g i n g di s t i n c t i v e qu a l i t y co m m u n i t y an d re g i o n a l co m m e r c i a l an d in d u s t r i a l de v e l o p m e n t s th a t su p p o r t th e ci t y Is ov e r a l l de v e l o p m e n t go a l s , 17 . 3 . 2 . 2 . Po l i c y LU - 6 — E Su p p o r t i n g th e gr o w t h Ma n a g e m e n t Ac t s go a l to en c o u r a g e gr o w t h , in c l u d i n g in d u s t r i a l gr o w t h , in ur b a n ar e a s , an d 17 . 3 . 3 . Ad d i t i o n a l l y , th e pr o p o s a l is co n s i s t e n t wi t h Ci t y Co u n c i l — a p p r o v e d Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n am e n d m e n t s . Th e s e am e n d m e n t s ha v e be e n de t e r m i n e d to be in th e pu b l i c in t e r e s t an d su p p o r t i v e of th e Ci t y is ob j e c t i v e s fo r an in c r e a s e of in d u s t r i a l fa c i l i t i e s , co o r d i n a t e d gr o w t h , an d ej f e c t i v e pr o v i s i o n of pu b l i c fa c i l i t i e s . Z 20 2 6 - 0 0 2 Ch a v o s h i , LL C Pa g e 3 of 6 Page 129 of 266 17 . 4 . Th e ef f e c t it wi l l ha v e on th e va l u e an d ch a r a c t e r of th e ad j a c e n t pr o p e r t y an d th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n : 17 . 4 . 1 . Th e pr o p o s e d Li g h t In d u s t r i a l (I — I ) zo n i n g su p p o r t s co m m e r c i a l an d in d u s t r i a l de v e l o p m e n t th a t is co m p a t i b l e wi t h ne i g h b o r i n g pr o p e r t i e s , lo c a t e d to th e no r t h , so u t h , ea s t , an d we s t of th e su b j e c t pr o p e r t y . By al i g n i n g wi t h th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n is In d u s t r i a l de s i g n a t i o n , th e re z o n e pr o m o t e s or d e r l y an d co m p a t i b l e gr o w t h wh i l e ma i n t a i n i n g th e ar e a is in t e n d e d ch a r a c t e r . An y fu t u r e de v e l o p m e n t ac t i o n s wi l l be su b j e c t to re v i e w un d e r th e Pa s c o Mu n i c i p a l Co d e an d po s s i b l y SE P A to en s u r e th a t po t e n t i a l im p a c t s on th e na t u r a l an d bu i l t en v i r o n m e n t , as we l l as on aa h ' a c e n t pr o p e r t y va l u e s , ar e pr o p e r l y id e n t i ? e d an d mi t i g a t e d . 17 . 5 . Th e ef f e c t on th e pr o p e r t y ow n e r or ow n e r s if th e re q u e s t is no t gr a n t e d : 17 . 5 . 1 . If th e re z o n e re q u e s t is no t gr a n t e d , th e su b j e c t si t e wo u l d li m i t th e ap p l i c a n t . Th e ap p l i c a n t st a t e s th e pr o j e c t of th e so i l te s t i n g fa c i l i t y wo u l d no t mo v e fo r w a r d . Th e cu r r e n t C- 3 zo n i n g do e s no t pe r m i t ex p e r i m e n t a l la b o r a t o r i e s , ho w e v e r la b o r a t o r i e s ar e a pe r m i t t e d us e in th e I— 1 zo n e . Un d e r th e s e st a n d a r d s , th e si t e wo u l d re m a i n as it is cu r r e n t l y wi t h a ca r / tr u c k wa s h . In ad d i t i o n , de v e l o p m e n t un d e r C— 3 zo n i n g wo u l d no t me e t th e in t e n d e d de v e l o p m e n t pa t t e r n wi t h i n th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n is de s i g n a t i o n of In d u s t r i a l , fu r t h e r hi g h l i g h t i n g th e in c o n s i s t e n c y wi t h th e Ci t y is ad o p t e d [a n d us e po l i c i e s . 17 . 6 . Th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n la n d us e de s i g n a t i o n fo r th e pr o p e r t y : 17 . 6 . 1 . Th e Ci t y of Pa s c o Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n de s i g n a t e s th e si t e as In d u s t r i a l . Th e pr o p o s e d zo n i n g de s i g n a t i o n of [- 1 is co n s i s t e n t wi t h th e In d u s t r i a l la n d us e de s i g n a t i o n . 17 . 7 . Su c h ot h e r in f o r m a t i o n as th e He a r i n g Ex a m i n e r re q u i r e s : 17 . 7 . 1 . Th e re z o n e ap p l i c a t i o n is co n s i s t e n t wi t h an d su p p o r t s th e in t e n t of th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n as we l l as th e Ci t y Co u n c i l is go a l s . 18 . PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 6 0 FI N D I N G S : 18 . 1 . Th e pr o p o s a l is in ac c o r d wi t h th e go a l s an d po l i c i e s of th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n . 18 . 1 . 1 . Th e La n d Us e El e m e n t of th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n de s i g n a t e s th e si t e as In d u s t r i a l . Th e pr o p o s e d I— 1 re z o n e is co n s i s t e n t wi t h th e La n d Us e Ma p de s i g n a t i o n an d ad v a n c e s th e go a l s an d po l i c i e s of th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n . 18 . 1 . 2 . In pa r t i c u l a r , it su p p o r t s La n d Us e Go a l LU - 6 wh i c h en c o u r a g e s di s t i n c t i v e qu a l i t y co m m u n i t y an d re g i o n a l co m m e r c i a l an d in d u s t r i a l de v e l o p m e n t s th a t su p p o r t th e ci t y ’ s ov e r a l l de v e l o p m e n t go a l s , as we l l as Po l i c y LU - 6 - E , wh i c h em p h a s i z e s su p p o r t fo r th e Gr o w t h Ma n a g e m e n t Ac t ’ s go a l to en c o u r a g e in d u s t r i a l gr o w t h in ur b a n ar e a s , an d Go a l ED — 2 as s u r i n g ap p r o p r i a t e lo c a t i o n an d de s i g n of co m m e r c i a l an d in d u s t r i a l fa c i l i t i e s . 18 . 1 . 3 . Th e re z o n e su p p o r t s La n d Us e Go a l LU - 6 by ch a n g i n g th e zo n e of th e pr o p e r t y . to ma t c h bo t h th e ch a r a c t e r of th e si t e an d th e La n d us e Ma p . 18 . 1 . 5 . Th e re z o n e su p p o r t s Go a l ED - Z by en s u r i n g th e in d u s t r i a l de v e l o p m e n t is wi t h i n an ar e a bo r d e r e d by th e in d u s t r i a l zo n e , tr a i n tr a c k s , an d in t e n s e co m m e r c i a l ac t i v i t y . By al i g n i n g th e zo n i n g wi t h th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n de s i g n a t i o n , th e re z o n e he l p s en s u r e or d e r l y , co m p a t i b l e , an d ef ? c i e n t de v e l o p m e n t in th e ar e a . 18 . 2 . Th e ef f e c t of th e pr o p o s a l on th e im m e d i a t e vi c i n i t y wi l l no t be ma t e r i a l l y de t r i m e n t a l . Z 20 2 6 — 0 0 2 Ch a v o s h i , LL C Pa g e 4 of 6 Page 130 of 266 18 . 2 . 1 . Th e pr o p o s e d zo n i n g ch a n g e is no t an t i c i p a t e d to cr e a t e ma t e r i a l l y de t r i m e n t a l im p a c t s to th e im m e d i a t e vi c i n i t y . Th e re q u e s t e d I- 1 de s i g n a t i o n is co m p a t i b l e wi t h ad j a c e n t in d u s t r i a l an d ge n e r a l co m m e r c i a l us e s as we l l as be i n g co n s i s t e n t wi t h th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e In d u s t r i a l la n d us e de s i g n a t i o n . An y fu t u r e de v e l o p m e n t wi l l be re q u i r e d to co m p l y wi t h al l ap p l i c a b l e Ci t y st a n d a r d s , in c l u d i n g se t b a c k s , la n d s c a p i n g , bu f f e r i n g , an d tr a f ? c mi t i g a t i o n , en s u r i n g th a t po t e n t i a l im p a c t s on ne i g h b o r i n g pr o p e r t i e s ar e mi n i m i z e d an d ap p r o p r i a t e l y ma n a g e d . 18 . 3 . I Th e r e is me r i t an d va l u e in th e pr o p o s a l fo r th e co m m u n i t y as a wh o l e . 18 . 3 . 1 . Th i s pr o p o s a l al i g n s wi t h th e gu i d a n c e of th e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n fo r th e su b j e c t si t e . Th e Pl a n id e n t i f i e s th e si t e fo r In d u s t r i a l us e an d ap p l y i n g th e I- 1 zo n i n g de s i g n a t i o n is co n s i s t e n t wi t h th a t gu i d a n c e . Th e re z o n e wi l l cr e a t e op p o r t u n i t i e s fo r in d u s t r i a l an d bu s i n e s s re d e v e l o p m e n t an d al l o w i n g fo r ec o n o m i c gr o w t h . Ad d i t i o n a l l y , th e pr o p o s a l pr o m o t e s pl a n n e d an d or d e r l y re d e v e l o p m e n t , an d su p p o r t s th e lo n g - t e r m go a l s of th e co m m u n i t y , in c l u d i n g en s u r i n g th e ap p r o p r i a t e lo c a t i o n , an d de v e l o p m e n t of In d u s t r i a l us e s wi t h i n ci t y li m i t s . 18 . 4 . No co n d i t i o n s sh o u l d be im p o s e d in or d e r to mi t i g a t e an y si g n i ? c a n t ad v e r s e im p a c t s fr o m th e pr o p o s a l . 18 . 4 . 1 . No co n d i t i o n s ar e ne c e s s a r y as pa r t of th i s re z o n e re q u e s t . Th e ap p l i c a t i o n , as we l l as an y fu t u r e de v e l o p m e n t , wi l l be su b j e c t to th e ap p l i c a b l e pr o v i s i o n s of th e PM C an d th e Ci t y of Pa s c o De s i g n an d Co n s t r u c t i o n St a n d a r d s . Ac c o r d i n g l y , th e im p o s i t i o n of co n d i t i o n s at th i s st a g e is no t wa r r a n t e d . 18 . 5 . No co n c o m i t a n t ag r e e m e n t sh o u l d be en t e r e d in t o be t w e e n th e Ci t y an d th e pe t i t i o n e r . 18 . 5 . 1 . A co n c o m i t a n t ag r e e m e n t is no t ne c e s s a r y fo r th i s pr o p o s a l . Th e re q u e s t e d re z o n i n g co m p l i e s wi t h al l ap p l i c a b l e Ci t y st a n d a r d s an d re q u i r e m e n t s , an d no ad d i t i o n a l te r m s or co n d i t i o n s be y o n d th o s e al r e a d y es t a b l i s h e d in th e PM C an d ad o p t e d de v e l o p m e n t re g u l a t i o n s ar e wa r r a n t e d . Ac c o r d i n g l y , no fu r t h e r co m m i t m e n t s or ag r e e m e n t s ar e re q u i r e d . 19 . Th e Ci t y of Pa s c o He a r i n g Ex a m i n e r co n s i d e r e d al l ev i d e n c e wi t h i n th e re c o r d in re n d e r i n g th i s de c i s i o n . 20 . An y Co n c l u s i o n of La w th a t is mo r e co r r e c t l y a Fi n d i n g of Fa c t is he r e b y in c o r p o r a t e d as su c h by th i s re f e r e n c e . II . RE C O M M E N D E D CO N C L U S I O N S OF LA W 1. Th e He a r i n g Ex a m i n e r ha s be e n gr a n t e d th e au t h o r i t y to re n d e r th i s de c i s i o n . 2. Th i s pr o p o s a l is co n s i s t e n t wi t h th e Pa s c o Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n an d Pa s c o Mu n i c i p a l Co d e . re f e r e n c e . Z 20 2 6 - 0 0 2 Ch a v o s h i , LL C Pa g e 5 of 6 Page 131 of 266 II I . RE C O M M E N D E D DE C I S I O N Ba s e d on th e ab o v e Fi n d i n g s of Fa c t an d Co n c l u s i o n s of La w , Z 20 2 6 - 0 0 2 is he r e b y re c o m m e n d e d fo r AP P R O V A L . Da t e d th i s Z: 3da y of Ma r c h , 20 2 6 . CI T Y OF PA S C O HE A R I N G EX A M I N E R , PR O TE M K J D. Ey e s t o n e Th i s re c o m m e n d a t i o n is su b j e c t to a ti m e l y ?l e d ap p e a l pu r s u a n t to PM C 25 . 2 1 0 . 0 7 0 Z 20 2 6 - 0 0 2 Ch a v o s h i , LL C Pa g e 6 of 6 Page 132 of 266 Proposed Zoning Map :u 1th u ,m w Ah‘‘N“, mew m Medmm Densnv Resuenha‘msmu ‘‘-c 3 (Emma Busmess mm -RP “WM Pm Wm ‘‘ w W"moms a‘sthm Pa g e 1 3 3 o f 2 6 6 1 James Bagley From:Kaleb Casey <kcasey@franklincountywa.gov> Sent:Friday, February 13, 2026 8:18 AM To:Paul Knutzen Cc:Sam Chavoshi Subject:RE: Parcel Consolidation Request Hi Paul, Good morning and happy Friday. Parcels 113493131 and 113493159 have been combined. The new parcel number is 113493160. Best, Kaleb Casey Franklin County Assessors Office GIS Technician P: (509) 545-3571 E: kcasey@franklincountywa.gov From: Paul Knutzen <paul@knutzenengineering.com> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2026 5:46 AM To: Kaleb Casey <kcasey@franklincountywa.gov> Cc: Sam Chavoshi <sam@agnema.com> Subject: Parcel Consolidation Request Good Morning Kaleb, Attached is the City of Pasco signed parcel combination request along with a receipt that the property owner paid his taxes. Can you pleas combine these into a single parcel and let me know what the new APN will be? Tha Warning: Unusual sender <paul@knutzenengineering.com> You don't usually receive emails from this address. Make sure you trust this sender before taking any actions. Good Morning Kaleb, Attached is the City of Pasco signed parcel combination request along with a receipt that the property owner paid his taxes. Can you pleas combine these into a single parcel and let me know what the new APN will be? Thanks, Paul Knutzen, P.E., LEED AP BD+C Principal Engineer O: 509.222.0959 C: 509.440.1817 PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. You don't often get email from paul@knutzenengineering.com. Learn why this is important Page 134 of 266 Pasco City Council April 27, 2026 Regular Workshop Pa g e 1 3 5 o f 2 6 6 Introduction of Ordinance-Knutzen Engineering C-3 to I-1 Rezone-Z 2026-002 April 27, 2026 Pasco City Council Pa g e 1 3 6 o f 2 6 6 Quasi-Judicial Action PMC Comp Plan Map Proposed City Zoning Map 01 02 03 04 Pa g e 1 3 7 o f 2 6 6 How Quasi-Judicial Decisions Are Handled in Pasco Quasi-Judicial Process Overview (Why This Workshop) •Quasi-judicial actions apply existing law to a specific property and require a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner •The Hearing Examiner conducts the hearing, creates the official record, and issues a written recommendation with findings and conclusions •From issuance of the recommendation until final Council action, ex parte communication is prohibited; Council may rely only on the hearing record •A 10-day appeal period follows the recommendation; if appealed—or if Council determines further review is needed—a closed record hearing is required with at least 14 days’ notice •Closed record hearings allow no new evidence and limit participation to summaries from prior commenters •At the conclusion, City Council must enter findings and either approve (with or without modification), enter a concomitant agreement, or deny the request •Staff and the City Attorney are available to assist Council and ensure the proper process is followed Pa g e 1 3 8 o f 2 6 6 Rezone -PMC Requirements for zoning petition (PMC 25.210.030): •A rezone petition must identify when the current zoning took effect, explain the changed conditions and justification for the request, address impacts on adjacent properties and the Comprehensive Plan, note the property’s Comprehensive Plan designation, state the effect on the owner if denied, and include any additional information required by the Hearing Examiner. Hearing Examiner –Findings and recommendations (PMC 25.210.060): •After an open record hearing on a rezone petition, the Hearing Examiner must issue findings and conclusions addressing whether the proposal aligns with the Comprehensive Plan, avoids material detriment to the vicinity, provides community benefit, requires conditions to mitigate impacts, and/or necessitates a concomitant agreement with the City. Process Milestones: •Public Hearing held: March 11, 2026 •Hearing Examiner Recommendation March 23, 2026: Approval of I-1 Zoning City Council Consideration: 1) Approve the recommended rezoning (with or without modifications) 2) Enter into a Concomitant Agreement (PMC 25.210.100) 3) Deny the proposed rezone Pa g e 1 3 9 o f 2 6 6 Pa g e 1 4 0 o f 2 6 6 Pa g e 1 4 1 o f 2 6 6 Pa g e 1 4 2 o f 2 6 6 Questions? Thank you! Pa g e 1 4 3 o f 2 6 6 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 25, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/27/26 FROM: Haylie Matson, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Q - Ordinance - Introduction of Quasi Judicial Item - Ordinance for Elite Investment Group, LLC Rezone from R-4 and C-1 to MU (Z2026-003) (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Ordinance Hearing Examiner Recommendation Zoning Map Power Point Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Informational Presentation III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background: Parcel Nos. 115392077 and 115392022 (5804 Road 90) were annexed into the City (Residential R-T assigned and 2388 Ordinance under 1981 in No. 2007, Transition) zoning. In both parcels were rezoned to C-1 (Retail Business). In 2021, Parcel No. 115392077 was rezoned from C-1 to R-4 (High Density Residential), while Parcel No. 115392022 has remained zoned C-1 and was developed with a commercial building in 2017. For clarity, this proposal is located between Road 90 and Road 92, north of Sandifur Parkway, and is separate from other rezone requests by the same applicant that may be considered at the same meeting. On February 5, 2026, Elite Investment Group, LLC submitted an application to Page 144 of 266 rezone Parcel No. 115392077 from R-4 (High Density Residential) to Mixed Use and Parcel No. 115392022 (5804 Road 90) from C-1 (Retail Business) to Mixed Use. Public notice was mailed on February 19, 2026, to property owners within 300 feet and published in the Tri-City Herald on February 25, 2026. The proposal generated minimal public interest, with limited inquiries that were not directly related to the rezone request. The Hearing Examiner held a public hearing on March 11, 2026, to consider the proposed rezone, as shown in Exhibit B. On March 23, 2026, the Hearing Examiner recommended approval, finding the request consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and forwarded the recommendation to City Council for final consideration pursuant to PMC 25.210.060(2). Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: North: R-4, R-3, R-1 – Single-family attached and detached residential East: C-1, R-1 – Office, restaurant, and single-family residential South: Mixed Use, C-1 – Undeveloped and commercial uses West: C-1 – Retail and mini storage Impact (other than fiscal): The proposed rezone is non-project in nature and establishes a framework for future mixed-use development consistent with the City’s long-range planning objectives. The zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and supports development in proximity to key intersections. This action does not authorize or result in any immediate construction or physical changes to the site. Any future development would be subject to project-level review to ensure compliance with applicable regulations, including evaluation of traffic, access, site layout, buffering, drainage, and building design, as well as any required mitigation. V. DISCUSSION: Conclusion & Recommendation: Staff and the Hearing Examiner find that the requested rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal supports orderly growth, aligns with long-term development objectives, and provides a framework for future residential and commercial development while ensuring that any future projects will be reviewed for compliance and potential mitigation. Accordingly, both Staff and the Hearing Examiner recommend that the City Council approve the requested rezones through the associated Ordinance. Page 145 of 266 Constraints (Time or other considerations): While the PMC Title 25 Zoning does not specify a time frame for processing applications, Title 4, which is applicable to Title 25, provides that “the Director shall issue a notice of final decision on a project permit application within 120 days The is application the complete.” applicant the notifying after that applicant was issued a Notice of Complete Application on February 13, 2026. Although staff the statutory deadline has not yet arrived, respectfully recommends that the City Council proceed with a timely review and processing of the application to ensure orderly consideration and to serve the best interests of the applicant and community. Staff Analysis & Hearing Examiner Findings: Following the conclusion of an open record hearing on the properties rezone petition, the Hearing Examiner shall issue findings and conclusions based on the record, pursuant to PMC Subsection 25.210.060(1)(a) through (e), applying the initial review criteria set forth in PMC Section 25.210.030. The findings and conclusions are as follows: (a) The proposal is in accord with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the sites as Mixed Residential/Commercial. The proposed mixed-use rezone is consistent with this Land Use Map designation and advances the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the proposal supports Land Use Policy LU- 4(B) through (D), which promote infill and higher-density development in proximity to major travel corridors and public transportation; encourage walkable communities through increased mixed-use development; and designate areas for higher density where utilities and transportation infrastructure allow for efficient use of public capital resources. (b) The effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity will be materially detrimental The proposed rezone is not expected to be materially detrimental to properties in the immediate vicinity. The sites are located in an area where residential and commercial uses already exist in close proximity. The mixed-use designation allows residential uses to continue while permitting limited commercial activity consistent with surrounding development patterns. Because the mixed-use zone functions as a transitional designation between residential and commercial areas, it provides compatibility rather than conflict. The range of permitted uses and applicable development standards are intended to mitigate impacts related to scale, intensity, traffic, and site design. Given the existing context and the regulatory controls that apply to mixed-use development, the proposal is not anticipated to adversely affect the value, use, or character of adjacent properties. Therefore, the rezone would not result in a materially detrimental effect on the immediate vicinity. Page 146 of 266 (c) There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole There is merit and value in the proposed rezone because it implements the Comprehensive Plan’s designation of the sites are Mixed Residential/Commercial. Applying the mixed-use zoning classification ensures consistency between the City’s adopted long-range plan and its development regulations. The proposal creates opportunities for additional housing and commercial development within the same area, supporting a more efficient and integrated land use pattern. By encouraging mixed-use development, the rezone and activity, economic availability, housing advances promotes supports walkable, connected neighborhoods. Additionally, the proposal public services, and infrastructure existing efficient use the facilitates of promotes orderly growth, and advances the community’s long-term goals related to livability, connectivity, and economic vitality. For these reasons, the rezone provides clear merit and value to the community as a whole. (d) Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the proposal No conditions are necessary at the rezone stage. The proposed zoning classification establishes a regulatory framework but does not authorize specific development. Any future development of the sites will be subject to the applicable provisions of the Pasco Municipal Code and the City of Pasco Design and Construction Standards. Subsequent project-level applications will undergo independent review, including environmental review as applicable, to identify and mitigate any potential significant adverse impacts. Because no specific development is proposed at this time and adequate regulatory controls are already in place, the imposition of conditions as part of this rezone is not warranted. (e) A concomitant agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and, if so, the terms and condition of such an agreement A concomitant agreement is not necessary for this proposal. The requested rezoning complies with all applicable City standards and requirements, and no additional terms or conditions beyond those already established in the PMC and adopted development regulations are warranted. Accordingly, no further commitments or agreements are required. Next Steps: If the Ordinance is adopted, the City Clerk’s Office will record it with the Franklin County Auditor, and staff will issue a Notice of Decision to all affected parties. Alternatives: In accordance with PMC Section 25.210.080, if the City Council determines by majority vote that further review is warranted, a closed record hearing is required, and at least 14 days’ notice shall be given prior to the hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Council may approve the reclassification with or Page 147 of 266 without modifications, enter into a concomitant agreement with the petitioner, or deny the reclassification. The Council may adopt the Hearing Examiner’s findings and conclusions or formulate alternative findings to support its decision to approve, modify, or deny the application. Page 148 of 266 Ordinance Rezone Z 2026-003 - 1 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: City of Pasco, Washington WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Pasco, Washington Attn: City Clerk 525 North 3rd Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF SANDIFUR PARKWAY, WEST OF ROAD 90, SOUTH OF RUVEN STREET, AND EAST OF ROAD 92, PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, FROM R-4 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND C-1 (RETAIL BUSINESS) TO MIXED-USE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Elite Investment Group, LLC, the petitioner seeks to rezone Parcel Nos. 115392077 (from R-4 to Mixed-Use) and 115392022 (from C-1 to Mixed-Use), located north of Sandifur Parkway, west of Road 90, south of Ruven Street, and east of Road 92, Pasco, Washington; and WHEREAS, a complete and adequate petition for change of zoning classification meeting the requirements of Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Section 25.210.030 was received by the City of Pasco (City) and, after notice was issued under PMC Section 25.210.040, an open record hearing was conducted by the Pasco Hearing Examiner upon such petition on March 11, 2026; and WHEREAS, based upon substantial evidence and demonstration of the Petitioner that: (a) the proposal is in accord with the goals and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan; (b) the effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity is not materially detrimental; (c) there is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole; (d) any impacts of the rezone application and anticipated development will be mitigated by the regulations and requirements of the Pasco Municipal Code and the City of Pasco Design and Constructions Standards; (e) a concomitant agreement is not required under these circumstances; and (f) the proposal is consistent with and satisfies all criteria in PMC Section 25.210.060; the Hearing Examiner has recommended to approve the rezone, which findings and recommendation are hereby adopted by the City Council, and the Hearing Examiner Report is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit A. Page 149 of 266 Ordinance Rezone Z 2026-003 - 2 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Pasco, Washington, and the Zoning Map, accompanying and being part of said Ordinance shall be and hereby is changed from R-4 (High Density Residential) and C-1 (Retail Business) to Mixed-Use for the real property as shown in the Exhibit B attached hereto and described as follows: Parcel No. 115392077 (R-4 to Mixed-Use) LOT 23, COLE ESTATES Parcel No. 115392022 (C-1 to Mixed-Use) LOT 10, COLE ESTATES Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this ordinance. Section 3. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including scrivener’s errors or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. Page 150 of 266 Ordinance Rezone Z 2026-003 - 3 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of _____, 2026. Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Krystle Shanks Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC Deputy City Clerk City Attorney Published: _____________________________ Page 151 of 266 "Exhibit A" Page 152 of 266 Page 153 of 266 Page 154 of 266 Page 155 of 266 Page 156 of 266 Page 157 of 266 "Exhibit B" Pa g e 1 5 8 o f 2 6 6 Pasco City Council April 27, 2026 Workshop Pa g e 1 5 9 o f 2 6 6 Introduction of ordinance-Elite Investment Group, LLC (Road90/92 and Sandifur Pkwy) R-4 & C-1 to Mixed-Use Rezone-Z 2026-003 April 27, 2026 Pasco City Council Pa g e 1 6 0 o f 2 6 6 PMC Comp Plan Map Existing Zoning Map Proposed Zoning Map 01 02 03 04 Pa g e 1 6 1 o f 2 6 6 Rezone -PMC Requirements for zoning petition (PMC 25.210.030): •A rezone petition must identify when the current zoning took effect, explain the changed conditions and justification for therequest, address impacts on adjacent properties and the Comprehensive Plan, note the property’s Comprehensive Plan designation, state the effect on the owner if denied, and include any additional information required by the Hearing Examiner. Hearing Examiner –Findings and recommendations (PMC 25.210.060): •After an open record hearing on a rezone petition, the Hearing Examiner must issue findings and conclusions addressing whether the proposal aligns with the Comprehensive Plan, avoids material detriment to the vicinity, provides community benefit, requires conditions to mitigate impacts, and/or necessitates a concomitant agreement with the City. Process Milestones: •Public Hearing held: March 11, 2026 •Hearing Examiner Recommendation March 23, 2026: Approval of Mixed-Use Zoning City Council Consideration: 1) Approve the recommended rezoning (with or without modifications) 2) Enter into a Concomitant Agreement (PMC 25.210.100) 3) Deny the proposed rezone Pa g e 1 6 2 o f 2 6 6 4.9 acres are proposed for rezoning to MU. Pa g e 1 6 3 o f 2 6 6 Pa g e 1 6 4 o f 2 6 6 Pa g e 1 6 5 o f 2 6 6 Questions? Thank you! Pa g e 1 6 6 o f 2 6 6 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 23, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/27/26 FROM: Brent Cook, Police Chief Police Department SUBJECT: Resolution and Ordinance - Authorizing acceptance of grant funding and execution of a grant agreement with the Washington State Department of Commerce, Office of Crime Victims Advocacy and Amending 2025– 2026 Operating Budget (5 min staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Resolution Grant Agreement - DVHRT Contract Ordinance Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: The city will receive $44,190.00 in grant funding from the Washington State Department of Commerce, Office of Crime Victims Advocacy, for the period of April 1, 2026, through June 30, 2026. Budget allocation: Salaries: $29,178.00 Benefits: $15,012.00 There is no local match requirement, and the funding is provided on a reimbursement basis. This grant supports a detective position by funding an existing role; it does not create a new position or generate additional costs for the City. This first contract covers $44,190.00 for the period April through June only. A second contract will be issued later for the remaining approved grant funds of Page 167 of 266 $88,376.00, which will cover July 1 through December 3, 2026. Together, both contracts make up the full award of $132,566.00. The second funding period is not included in the current contract and will be addressed separately. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background: In the mid-1990s, the Pasco Police Department participated in a STOP grant- funded Domestic Violence Advocate program administered through the Washington Office of Crime Victim Advocacy (OCVA). This program supported victims of domestic violence by providing access to services, protection orders, and advocacy resources across Benton and Franklin Counties. In January 2025, the Department elected not to renew participation due to insufficient funding levels to sustain personnel costs. Following that decision, the & Benton of Services with Domestic partnered Department Violence Franklin Counties (DVSBF) to implement the Danger Assessment for Law Enforcement (DA-LE) tool. This evidence-based assessment supports officers in identifying high-risk domestic violence cases and connecting victims to resources through a Domestic Violence High Risk Team (DVHRT) model. The Pasco Police Department subsequently applied for and was awarded STOP grant funding to support a DVHRT Investigator position. This position will focus on trauma-informed investigations, high-risk case management, and coordinated response efforts aimed at reducing domestic violence-related serious injury and homicide. The funding supports a Domestic Violence High Risk Team Investigator role and associated program activities. Impact (other than fiscal): Enhances victim safety through early identification of high-risk domestic violence cases Strengthens coordinated regional response with DVSBF and partner agencies Improves investigative outcomes through trauma-informed practices Supports offender accountability and violence prevention strategies Aligns with Council goals related to public safety and community well- being V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation: Staff seeks Council direction on acceptance of the grant funding and the proposed budget amendment. Page 168 of 266 Constraints (time or other considerations): The grant period began April 1, 2026, and ends June 30, 2026, requiring timely Council action to ensure full utilization of the awarded funds. Next Steps: Upon approval, assign an existing sworn officer to the DVHRT investigator role Formalize coordination protocols with DVSBF and regional partners Begin implementation of enhanced case management and investigation practices Track performance metrics and prepare required grant reporting Alternatives: Do not approve the grant funding, resulting in no dedicated DVHRT Investigator Delay approval pending additional information or program analysis Explore alternative funding sources to support a similar position outside of the grant Page 169 of 266 Resolution – DVHRT Program ILA - 1 RESOLUTION NO. ____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FUNDING AND EXECUTION OF A GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, OFFICE OF CRIME VICTIMS ADVOCACY, FOR THE SFY26 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HIGH RISK TEAM (DVHRT) PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Commerce, Office of Crime Victims Advocacy, administers grant funding to support coordinated responses to high-risk domestic violence cases; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco Police Department has been awarded grant funding in the amount of $44,190 to support participation in the Domestic Violence High Risk Team (DVHRT) Program for the period of April 1, 2026, through June 30, 2026; and WHEREAS, ; and the grant will support a Domestic Violence High Risk Team Investigator role and related program activities focused on high-risk case investigation, victim safety, and offender accountability through coordinated regional response; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that entering into this grant agreement is in the best interest of the City of Pasco; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the Grant Agreement between the Washington State Department of Commerce, Office of Crime Victims Advocacy, and the City of Pasco for the SFY26 Domestic Violence High Risk Team Program; a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A; and Be It Further Resolved, that the City Council authorizes the City Manager to sign and execute the Grant Agreement (Contract No. S26-31114 -009), and any amendments thereto, on behalf of the City of Pasco; Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately. Page 170 of 266 Resolution – DVHRT Program ILA - 2 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of ________________, 2026. Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Krystle Shanks Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC Deputy City Clerk City Attorney Page 171 of 266 Interagency Agreement with Pasco Police Department through Office of Crime Victims Advocacy Community Services Division Grant Number: S26-31114-009 For SFY26 Domestic Violence High Risk Team Program Dated: 04/01/2026 Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 172 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 14 Table of Contents FACE SHEET ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................................... 4 1. AUTHORITY ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. BILLING PROCEDURES AND PAYMENT ............................................................................................................. 4 3. COMPENSATION .............................................................................................................................................. 5 4. CONTINGENCY OF FUNDING……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 5. CONTRACT MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................. 5 6. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HIGH RISK TEAM REQUIREMENTS………………………………………………………………….…………5 7. FRAUD AND OTHER LOSS REPORTING ............................................................................................................. 6 8. GRANT MODIFICATION .................................................................................................................................... 6 9. INSURANCE ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 10. REPORTING…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………6 11. SUBCONTRACTOR DATA COLLECTION…………………………………………………………………………………………..……………6 12. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE .................................................................................................................................. 6 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................................... 7 1. DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN ................................................................................................................. 7 3. AMENDMENTS ................................................................................................................................................ 7 4. ASSIGNMENT ................................................................................................................................................... 7 5. CONFIDENTIALITY AND SAFEGUARDING OF INFORMATION ........................................................................... 7 6. COPYRIGHT ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 7. DISPUTES ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 8. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE ........................................................................................................................ 8 9. INDEMNIFICATION .......................................................................................................................................... 9 10. LICENSING, ACCREDITATION AND REGISTRATION ........................................................................................... 9 11. RECAPTURE...................................................................................................................................................... 9 12. RECORDS MAINTENANCE ................................................................................................................................ 9 13. SAVINGS .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 14. SEVERABILITY ................................................................................................................................................... 9 15. SUBCONTRACTING .......................................................................................................................................... 9 16. SURVIVAL ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 17. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE............................................................................................................................. 10 18. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE ................................................................................................................ 10 19. TERMINATION PROCEDURES ......................................................................................................................... 10 20. TREATMENT OF ASSETS ................................................................................................................................. 11 21. WAIVER ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 ATTACHMENT A: SCOPE OF WORK....................................................................................................................... 12 ATTACHMENT B: BUDGET .................................................................................................................................... 14 Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 173 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 14 Face Sheet Contract Number: S26-31114-009 Washington State Department of Commerce Community Services Division Office of Crime Victims Advocacy SFY26 Domestic Violence High Risk Team Program 1. Contractor 2. Contractor Doing Business As (as applicable) City of Pasco 525 N 3RD AVE PASCO, WA 99301 Pasco Police Department 3. Contractor Representative 4. COMMERCE Representative Jeff Harpster Captain harpsterj@pasco-wa.gov (509) 545-3483 Jorey Stine Program Manager (360) 725-2891 jorey.stine@commerce.wa.gov PO Box 42525 98504-8304 1011 Plum Street SE Olympia WA 98501 5. Contract Amount 6. Funding Source 7. Start Date 8. End Date $44,190.00 Federal: State: Other: N/A: 04/01/2026 06/30/2026 9. Federal Funds (as applicable) N/A Federal Agency: N/A ALN N/A 10. SWV # 11. UBI # 12. UEI # 13. Indirect Rate SWV0007164-00 113000052 SLEFSS3F3H88 N/A 14. Award Method Competitive: Yes Direct: NOFO/RFX # N/A Proviso # N/A 15. Grant Purpose To provide funding in support of Domestic Violence High Risk Teams to increase support to high-risk domestic violence victims and high-risk offender accountability. COMMERCE, defined as the Department of Commerce, and the Grantee, as defined above, acknowledge and accept the terms of this Grant and attachments and have executed this Grant on the date below to start as of the date and year referenced above. The rights and obligations of both parties to this Grant are governed by this Grant and the following other documents incorporated by reference: Grant Terms and Conditions including Attachment “A” – Scope of Work; Attachment “B” – Budget; and Grantee’s Application for funding. FOR CONTRACTOR FOR COMMERCE Name, Title Signature Date Cindy Guertin-Anderson, Assistant Director Date APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY BY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL APPROVAL ON FILE Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 174 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 14 Special Terms and Conditions 1. AUTHORITY COMMERCE and Contractor enter into this Contract pursuant to the authority granted by Chapter 39.34 RCW. 2. BILLING PROCEDURES AND PAYMENT COMMERCE will pay Contractor upon acceptance of services provided and receipt of properly completed invoices, which shall be submitted to the Representative for COMMERCE not more often than monthly nor less than quarterly. The Grantee shall submit all requests for reimbursement via the Commerce Contracts Management System (CMS) which is available through the Secure Access Washington (SAW) portal. The invoice shall include the Contract Number S26-31114-009. If applicable, Contractor must also include attachments that describe and document, to COMMERCE's satisfaction, a detailed description of the work performed, progress of the project, and/or receipts or other proof of payment. Except for approved indirect costs, if any, or as otherwise authorized by COMMERCE in writing, a receipt must accompany every expense in the amount of $50.00 or more to receive reimbursement. COMMERCE may request additional documentation at any time. Any expense reimbursed under this Contract which is later determined to be unallowable must be repaid according to the terms COMMERCE provides. Payment shall be considered timely if made by COMMERCE within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of properly completed invoices. Payment shall be made electronically utilizing Grantee’s Statewide Vendor (SWV) number. COMMERCE may, in its sole discretion, terminate the Contract or withhold payments claimed by the Contractor for services rendered if the Contractor fails to satisfactorily comply with any term or condition of this Contract. No payments in advance or in anticipation of services or supplies to be provided under this Agreement shall be made by COMMERCE. No payments in advance of or in anticipation of any expense reimbursable under this Grant shall be made by COMMERCE. If subgranting and/or subcontracting is authorized by COMMERCE, all Subgrantee/Subcontractor payments are reimbursable expenses within the meaning of this Agreement. Grantee must have, and may be required to demonstrate, the means to pay each and every Subgrantee/Subcontractor. Failure to pay Subgrantees/Subcontractors as agreed may result in suspension or termination of this Grant. Invoices and End of Fiscal Year Invoices are due on the 20th of the month following the provision of services. Final invoices for a state fiscal year may be due sooner than the 20th and Commerce will provide notification of the end of fiscal year due date. The Contractor must invoice for all expenses from the beginning of the contract through June 30, regardless of the contract start and end date. Duplication of Billed Costs The Contractor shall not bill COMMERCE for services performed under this Agreement, and COMMERCE shall not pay the Contractor, if the Contractor is entitled to payment or has been or will be paid by any other source, including grants, for that service. Disallowed Costs The Contractor is responsible for any audit exceptions or disallowed costs incurred by its own organization or that of its subcontractors. Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 175 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 14 Unless otherwise authorized by COMMERCE in writing, reimbursable payroll costs shall not include employee overtime nor bonus pay. COMMERCE may, in its sole discretion, withhold ten percent (10%) from each payment until acceptance by COMMERCE of the final report (or completion of the project, etc.). 3. COMPENSATION COMMERCE shall pay an amount not to exceed $44,190.00 for the performance of all things necessary for or incidental to the performance of work as set forth in the Scope of Work. Grantee's compensation for services rendered shall be based on the terms of the Scope of Work and Budget. Expenses Contractor shall receive reimbursement for approved expenses as identified below or as authorized in advance by COMMERCE as reimbursable. The maximum amount to be paid to the Contractor for authorized expenses shall not exceed $44,190.00 which amount is included in the Contract total above. If travel is required to complete the scope of work and approved in advance in writing, reimbursable travel expenses may include airfare (economy or coach class only), other transportation, lodging, and food necessary during periods of required travel. Transfer of funds between line item budget categories must be approved by the Office of Crime Victims Advocacy (OCVA) program staff. A cumulative amount of these transfers exceeding ten (10) percent of the total program budget shall be subject to justification and negotiation between the Grantee and OCVA, including approval from the Grantee’s signature authority and the relevant OCVA Section Manager. Payment will be on a reimbursement basis only. Travel expenses incurred or paid by Grantee shall be reimbursed at a rate not to exceed the current state rate and in accordance with the State of Washington Office of Financial Management Travel Regulations. Current travel rates may be accessed at: https://ofm.wa.gov/sites/default/files/public/resources/travel/colormap.pdf 4. CONTINGENCY OF FUNDING Funding is contingent on ongoing use of the Danger Assessment for Law Enforcement (DA-LE) by the Pasco Police Department. Funding is contingent on an active Domestic Violence High Risk Team in Franklin County. 5. CONTRACT MANAGEMENT The Representative for each of the parties shall be responsible for and shall be the contact person for all communications and billings regarding the performance of this Contract. The Representative for COMMERCE and their contact information are identified on the Face Sheet of this Contract. The Representative for the Contractor and their contact information are identified on the Face Sheet of this Contract. 6. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HIGH RISK TEAM REQUIREMENTS As a condition of grant funding the Pasco Police Department will participate in activities related to the Franklin County Domestic Violence High Risk Team project. This includes, as required by Commerce and/or The Geiger Institute: • Attending and participating in training, • Attending and participating in technical assistance calls, • Attending and participating in the Franklin County DVHRT meetings, and • Providing any data as requested. Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 176 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 14 7. FRAUD AND OTHER LOSS REPORTING Contractor shall report in writing all known or suspected fraud or other loss of any funds or other property furnished under this Contract immediately or as soon as practicable to the Commerce Representative identified on the Face Sheet. 8. GRANT MODIFICATION Notwithstanding any provision of this grant to the contrary, at any time during the grant period, COMMERCE may, by written notification to the Grantee and without notice to any known guarantor or surety, make changes within the general scope of the program activities to be performed under this Grant. All other modifications shall not be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties. Any oral understandings and agreements not incorporated herein, unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, shall not be binding. Notwithstanding any provision of this grant to the contrary, at any time during the grant period, COMMERCE may analyze grant expenditures as a proportion of the grant budget. If COMMERCE determines, in its sole discretion, that the grant funding is underutilized, COMMERCE, in its sole discretion, may unilaterally modify the grant to reduce the balance of the grant budget. Funds de- obligated by COMMERCE as a result of a budget reduction may be made available to other grantees for the provision of eligible program activities. 9. INSURANCE Each party certifies that it is self-insured under the State's or local government self-insurance liability program and shall be responsible for losses for which it is found liable. 10. REPORTING Contractors must collect and maintain data that measure the performance and effectiveness of work done under this contract. Procedures shall include gathering and submitting monthly DA-LE use data. The Contractor shall submit progress reports and requested data electronically on a form or in the system provided by COMMERCE on Domestic Violence High Risk Team project. 11. SUBCONTRACTOR DATA COLLECTION Contractor will submit reports, in a form and format to be provided by Commerce and at intervals as agreed by the parties, regarding work under this Contract performed by subcontractors and the portion of Contract funds expended for work performed by subcontractors, including but not necessarily limited to minority-owned, woman-owned, and veteran-owned business subcontractors. “Subcontractors” shall mean subcontractors of any tier. 12. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE In the event of an inconsistency in this Contract, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: Applicable federal and state of Washington statutes and regulations Special Terms and Conditions General Terms and Conditions Attachment A – Scope of Work Attachment B – Budget SFY26 Domestic Violence High Risk Team Program Application for Funding as submitted and approved by COMMERCE Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 177 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 7 of 14 General Terms and Conditions 1. DEFINITIONS As used throughout this Contract, the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below: A. “Authorized Representative” shall mean the Director and/or the designee authorized in writing to act on the Director’s behalf. B. “COMMERCE” shall mean the Washington Department of Commerce. C. “Contract” or “Agreement” or “Grant” means the entire written agreement between COMMERCE and the Contractor, including any Attachments, documents, or materials incorporated by reference. E-mail or Facsimile transmission of a signed copy of this contract shall be the same as delivery of an original. D. "Contractor" or “Grantee” shall mean the entity identified on the face sheet performing service(s) under this Contract, and shall include all employees and agents of the Contractor. E. “Personal Information” shall mean information identifiable to any person, including, but not limited to, information that relates to a person’s name, health, finances, education, business, use or receipt of governmental services or other activities, addresses, telephone numbers, social security numbers, driver license numbers, other identifying numbers, and any financial identifiers, and “Protected Health Information” under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). F. “State” shall mean the state of Washington. G. "Subcontractor" shall mean one not in the employment of the Contractor, who is performing all or part of those services under this Contract under a separate contract with the Contractor. The terms “subcontractor” and “subcontractors” mean subcontractor(s) in any tier. 2. ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 3. AMENDMENTS This Contract may be amended by mutual agreement of the parties. Such amendments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each of the parties. 4. ASSIGNMENT Neither this Contract, work thereunder, nor any claim arising under this Contract, shall be transferred or assigned by the Contractor without prior written consent of COMMERCE. 5. CONFIDENTIALITY AND SAFEGUARDING OF INFORMATION A. “Confidential Information” as used in this section includes: i. All material provided to the Contractor by COMMERCE that is designated as “confidential” by COMMERCE; ii. All material produced by the Contractor that is designated as “confidential” by COMMERCE; and iii. All Personal Information in the possession of the Contractor that may not be disclosed under state or federal law. B. The Contractor shall comply with all state and federal laws related to the use, sharing, transfer, sale, or disclosure of Confidential Information. The Contractor shall use Confidential Information solely Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 178 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 14 for the purposes of this Contract and shall not use, share, transfer, sell or disclose any Confidential Information to any third party except with the prior written consent of COMMERCE or as may be required by law. The Contractor shall take all necessary steps to assure that Confidential Information is safeguarded to prevent unauthorized use, sharing, transfer, sale or disclosure of Confidential Information or violation of any state or federal laws related thereto. Upon request, the Contractor shall provide COMMERCE with its policies and procedures on confidentiality. COMMERCE may require changes to such policies and procedures as they apply to this Contract whenever COMMERCE reasonably determines that changes are necessary to prevent unauthorized disclosures. The Contractor shall make the changes within the time period specified by COMMERCE. Upon request, the Contractor shall immediately return to COMMERCE any Confidential Information that COMMERCE reasonably determines has not been adequately protected by the Contractor against unauthorized disclosure. C. Unauthorized Use or Disclosure. The Contractor shall notify COMMERCE within twenty-four (24) hours of any unauthorized use or disclosure of any confidential information, and shall take necessary steps to mitigate the harmful effects of such use or disclosure. 6. COPYRIGHT Unless otherwise provided, all Materials produced under this Contract shall be considered "works for hire" as defined by the U.S. Copyright Act and shall be owned by COMMERCE. COMMERCE shall be considered the author of such Materials. In the event the Materials are not considered “works for hire” under the U.S. Copyright laws, the Contractor hereby irrevocably assigns all right, title, and interest in all Materials, including all intellectual property rights, moral rights, and rights of publicity to COMMERCE effective from the moment of creation of such Materials. “Materials” means all items in any format and includes, but is not limited to, data, reports, documents, pamphlets, advertisements, books, magazines, surveys, studies, computer programs, films, tapes, and/or sound reproductions. “Ownership” includes the right to copyright, patent, register and the ability to transfer these rights. For Materials that are delivered under the Contract, but that incorporate pre-existing materials not produced under the Contract, the Contractor hereby grants to COMMERCE a nonexclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license (with rights to sublicense to others) in such Materials to translate, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works, publicly perform, and publicly display. The Contractor warrants and represents that the Contractor has all rights and permissions, including intellectual property rights, moral rights and rights of publicity, necessary to grant such a license to COMMERCE. The Contractor shall exert all reasonable effort to advise COMMERCE, at the time of delivery of Materials furnished under this Contract, of all known or potential invasions of privacy contained therein and of any portion of such document which was not produced in the performance of this Contract. The Contractor shall provide COMMERCE with prompt written notice of each notice or claim of infringement received by the Contractor with respect to any Materials delivered under this Contract. COMMERCE shall have the right to modify or remove any restrictive markings placed upon the Materials by the Contractor. 7. DISPUTES In the event that a dispute arises under this Agreement, it shall be determined by a Dispute Board in the following manner: Each party to this Agreement shall appoint one member to the Dispute Board. The members so appointed shall jointly appoint an additional member to the Dispute Board. The Dispute Board shall review the facts, Agreement terms and applicable statutes and rules and make a determination of the dispute. The Dispute Board shall thereafter decide the dispute with the majority prevailing. The determination of the Dispute Board shall be final and binding on the parties hereto. As an alternative to this process, either of the parties may request intervention by the Governor, as provided by RCW 43.17.330, in which event the Governor's process will control. 8. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE This Contract shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the state of Washington, and the venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in the Superior Court for Thurston County. 9. INDEMNIFICATION Each party shall be solely responsible for the acts of its employees, officers, and agents. Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 179 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 9 of 14 10. LICENSING, ACCREDITATION AND REGISTRATION The Contractor shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal licensing, accreditation and registration requirements or standards necessary for the performance of this Contract. 11. RECAPTURE In the event that the Contractor fails to perform this Contract in accordance with state laws, federal laws, and/or the provisions of this Contract, COMMERCE reserves the right to recapture funds in an amount to compensate COMMERCE for the noncompliance in addition to any other remedies available at law or in equity. Repayment by the Contractor of funds under this recapture provision shall occur within the time period specified by COMMERCE. In the alternative, COMMERCE may recapture such funds from payments due under this Contract. 12. RECORDS MAINTENANCE The Contractor shall maintain books, records, documents, data and other evidence relating to this contract and performance of the services described herein, including but not limited to accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended in the performance of this Contract. The Contractor shall retain such records for a period of six years following the date of final payment. At no additional cost, these records, including materials generated under the Contract, shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection, review or audit by COMMERCE, personnel duly authorized by COMMERCE, the Office of the State Auditor, and federal and state officials so authorized by law, regulation or agreement. If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the six (6) year period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. 13. SAVINGS In the event funding from state, federal, or other sources is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way after the effective date of this Contract and prior to normal completion, COMMERCE may suspend or terminate the Contract under the "Termination for Convenience" clause, without the ten calendar day notice requirement. In lieu of termination, the Contract may be amended to reflect the new funding limitations and conditions. 14. SEVERABILITY The provisions of this Contract are intended to be severable. If any term or provision is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the Contract. 15. SUBCONTRACTING The Contractor may only subcontract work contemplated under this Contract if it obtains the prior written approval of COMMERCE. If COMMERCE approves subcontracting, the Contractor shall maintain written procedures related to subcontracting, as well as copies of all subcontracts and records related to subcontracts. For cause, COMMERCE in writing may: (a) require the Contractor to amend its subcontracting procedures as they relate to this Contract; (b) prohibit the Contractor from subcontracting with a particular person or entity; or (c) require the Contractor to rescind or amend a subcontract. Every subcontract shall bind the Subcontractor to follow all applicable terms of this Contract. The Contractor is responsible to COMMERCE if the Subcontractor fails to comply with any applicable term or condition of this Contract. The Contractor shall appropriately monitor the activities of the Subcontractor to assure fiscal conditions of this Contract. In no event shall the existence of a subcontract operate to release or reduce the liability of the Contractor to COMMERCE for any breach in the performance of the Contractor’s duties. Every subcontract shall include a term that COMMERCE and the State of Washington are not liable for claims or damages arising from a Subcontractor’s performance of the subcontract. Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 180 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 10 of 14 16. SURVIVAL The terms, conditions, and warranties contained in this Contract that by their sense and context are intended to survive the completion of the performance, cancellation or termination of this Contract shall so survive. 17. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE In the event COMMERCE determines the Contractor has failed to comply with the conditions of this Contract in a timely manner, COMMERCE has the right to suspend or terminate this Contract. Before suspending or terminating the Contract, COMMERCE shall notify the Contractor in writing of the need to take corrective action. If corrective action is not taken within 30 calendar days, the Contract may be terminated or suspended. In the event of termination or suspension, the Contractor shall be liable for damages as authorized by law including, but not limited to, any cost difference between the original contract and the replacement or cover contract and all administrative costs directly related to the replacement contract, e.g., cost of the competitive bidding, mailing, advertising and staff time. COMMERCE reserves the right to suspend all or part of the Contract, withhold further payments, or prohibit the Contractor from incurring additional obligations of funds during investigation of the alleged compliance breach and pending corrective action by the Contractor or a decision by COMMERCE to terminate the Contract. A termination shall be deemed a “Termination for Convenience” if it is determined that the Contractor: (1) was not in default; or (2) failure to perform was outside of his or her control, fault or negligence. The rights and remedies of COMMERCE provided in this Contract are not exclusive and are, in addition to any other rights and remedies, provided by law. 18. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE Except as otherwise provided in this Contract, COMMERCE may, by ten (10) business days’ written notice, beginning on the second day after the mailing, terminate this Contract, in whole or in part. If this Contract is so terminated, COMMERCE shall be liable only for payment required under the terms of this Contract for services rendered or goods delivered prior to the effective date of termination. 19. TERMINATION PROCEDURES Upon termination of this Contract, COMMERCE, in addition to any other rights provided in this Contract, may require the Contractor to deliver to COMMERCE any property specifically produced or acquired for the performance of such part of this Contract as has been terminated. The provisions of the "Treatment of Assets" clause shall apply in such property transfer. COMMERCE shall pay to the Contractor the agreed upon price, if separately stated, for completed work and services accepted by COMMERCE, and the amount agreed upon by the Contractor and COMMERCE for (i) completed work and services for which no separate price is stated, (ii) partially completed work and services, (iii) other property or services that are accepted by COMMERCE, and (iv) the protection and preservation of property, unless the termination is for default, in which case the Authorized Representative shall determine the extent of the liability of COMMERCE. Failure to agree with such determination shall be a dispute within the meaning of the "Disputes" clause of this Contract. COMMERCE may withhold from any amounts due the Contractor such sum as the Authorized Representative determines to be necessary to protect COMMERCE against potential loss or liability. The rights and remedies of COMMERCE provided in this section shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Contract. After receipt of a notice of termination, and except as otherwise directed by the Authorized Representative, the Contractor shall: A. Stop work under the Contract on the date, and to the extent specified, in the notice; B. Place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, services, or facilities except as may be necessary for completion of such portion of the work under the Contract that is not terminated; C. Assign to COMMERCE, in the manner, at the times, and to the extent directed by the Authorized Representative, all of the rights, title, and interest of the Contractor under the orders and subcontracts so terminated, in which case COMMERCE has the right, at its discretion, to settle or Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 181 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 14 pay any or all claims arising out of the termination of such orders and subcontracts; D. Settle all outstanding liabilities and all claims arising out of such termination of orders and subcontracts, with the approval or ratification of the Authorized Representative to the extent the Authorized Representative may require, which approval or ratification shall be final for all the purposes of this clause; E. Transfer title to COMMERCE and deliver in the manner, at the times, and to the extent directed by the Authorized Representative any property which, if the Contract had been completed, would have been required to be furnished to COMMERCE; F. Complete performance of such part of the work as shall not have been terminated by the Authorized Representative; and G. Take such action as may be necessary, or as the Authorized Representative may direct, for the protection and preservation of the property related to this Contract, which is in the possession of the Contractor and in which COMMERCE has or may acquire an interest. 20. TREATMENT OF ASSETS Title to all property furnished by COMMERCE shall remain in COMMERCE. Title to all property furnished by the Contractor, for the cost of which the Contractor is entitled to be reimbursed as a direct item of cost under this Contract, shall pass to and vest in COMMERCE upon delivery of such property by the Contractor. Title to other property, the cost of which is reimbursable to the Contractor under this Contract, shall pass to and vest in COMMERCE upon (i) issuance for use of such property in the performance of this Contract, or (ii) commencement of use of such property in the performance of this Contract, or (iii) reimbursement of the cost thereof by COMMERCE in whole or in part, whichever first occurs. A. Any property of COMMERCE furnished to the Contractor shall, unless otherwise provided herein or approved by COMMERCE, be used only for the performance of this Contract. B. The Contractor shall be responsible for any loss or damage to property of COMMERCE that results from the negligence of the Contractor or which results from the failure on the part of the Contractor to maintain and administer that property in accordance with sound management practices. C. If any COMMERCE property is lost, destroyed or damaged, the Contractor shall immediately notify COMMERCE and shall take all reasonable steps to protect the property from further damage. D. The Contractor shall surrender to COMMERCE all property of COMMERCE prior to settlement upon completion, termination or cancellation of this Contract. E. All reference to the Contractor under this clause shall also include Contractor’s employees, agents or Subcontractors. 21. WAIVER Waiver of any default or breach shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default or breach. Any waiver shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Contract unless stated to be such in writing and signed by Authorized Representative of COMMERCE. Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 182 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 12 of 14 Attachment A: Scope of Work Pasco Police Department shall furnish goods and services necessary to accomplish the activities under the SFY26 Domestic Violence High Risk Team (DVHRT) Program funding during the contract period. This Contract is not a benefit or entitlement to the Contractor. It is not to be used to acquire property or services for the government’s direct benefit. The principal purpose of this Contract is to provide funding for Pasco Police Department to accomplish a public purpose. This contract is a deliverable based contract, meaning that certain deliverables will need to be met in order to receive reimbursement. Funding from this Contract must be used to support the services outlined and approved in the SFY26 Domestic Violence High Risk Team Program funding application to ensure high risk victims have increased access to support and high risk offenders are held accountable. Activities shall include, but not be limited to: An intimate partner domestic violence investigator position to: o conduct comprehensive and trauma-informed investigations on high risk intimate partner domestic violence cases o prioritize cases with indicators of escalating violence and/or risk of homicide utilizing the Danger Assessment for Law Enforcement (DA-LE), and Danger Assessment (DA) information from victim services when available o provide internal subject matter expertise and assist new officers on best practices of trauma-informed, victim-centered intimate partner domestic violence responses and protocols o make recommendations on internal practices concerning additional domestic violence topics such as firearm removal, serving civil protection orders, and testifying in court on intimate partner violence dynamics o serve as liaison between the Pasco Police Department and other Franklin County DVHRT partners by: providing timely information to partners on case updates attending all Franklin County DVHRT meetings gathering Pasco Police Department’s DA-LE information and DV calls for service providing recommendations on connection protocols and additional law enforcement practices enhancing law enforcement and prosecution’s response to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking perpetrated by current or former intimate partners; attend approved local and/or national training sessions; participating in the Franklin County Domestic Violence High Risk Team including attending meetings and providing requested data and relevant case status information; active collaboration with victim services, prosecution, and other service providers to ensure a trauma informed and strong coordinated response for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking perpetrated by current or former intimate partners that enhances victim safety; and Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 183 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 13 of 14 ensuring that goods and services, supplies or administrative costs supported by this contract program are related to issues involving domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking perpetrated by intimate partners. Domestic Violence High Risk Team The Contractor will meet with the other Franklin County DVHRT members to monitor high risk case response, share case information, and implement coordinated interventions to increase the safety of victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking perpetuated by current or former intimate partners that enhances victim safety and holds perpetrators of intimate partner violence accountable. OCVA program staff may conduct periodic checks for compliance with the meetings. Noncompliance may result in suspension of payments to Contractor under this Contract. Deliverables The Contractor shall be responsible for the following deliverables: 1. Services -As detailed above 2. Partnership -Participation in monthly DVHRT meetings 3. Reports -Submit monthly DA-LE data 4. Vouchers -Must be submitted at least quarterly Performance Measures Provision of the deliverables listed above will be measured using the following performance measures: A. Participation in 100% of the domestic violence high risk team meetings B. 75% of required reports will be submitted on time C. 100% of vouchers will be completed on time Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 184 of 266 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 14 of 14 Attachment B: Budget Budget DVHRT Salaries $29,178.00 Benefits $15,012.00 Contract Total $44,190.00 Transfer of funds between line item budget categories must be approved by the Office of Crime Victims Advocacy (OCVA) program staff. A cumulative amount of these transfers exceeding ten (10) percent of the total program budget shall be subject to justification and negotiation between the Grantee and OCVA, including approval from the Grantee’s signature authority and the relevant OCVA Section Manager. Travel expenses incurred or paid by Grantee shall be reimbursed at a rate not to exceed the current state rate and in accordance with the State of Washington Office of Financial Management Travel Regulations. Current rates for travel may be accessed at https://ofm.wa.gov/sites/default/files/public/resources/travel/colormap.pdf. Any purchase over $10,000 must be pre-approved by COMMERCE. Docusign Envelope ID: CC00120D-7EE9-84CA-80AE-39A269D7F19F Page 185 of 266 Ordinance – 2025 – 2026 Operating Budget Amendment - 1 Version 3.6.26 ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2025-2026 BIENNIAL OPERATING BUDGET, AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 4794, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROPRIATION OF $44,190 IN GRANT FUNDS FOR THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HIGH RISK TEAM PROGRAM; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on December 9, 2024, the Pasco City Council approved Ordinance No. 4749, adopting the 2025-2026 Biennial Operating Budget; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has been awarded grant funding in the amount of $44,190 from the Washington State Department of Commerce, Office of Crime Victims Advocacy, for the SFY26 Domestic Violence High Risk Team Program; and WHEREAS, the grant funding will support personnel and program activities related to high-risk domestic violence case investigation, victim safety, and coordinated response efforts; and WHEREAS, these funds were not included in the adopted budget and require additional appropriation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant to RCW 35A.34.200(1)(d), as follows: Fund EXPENDITURE REVENUE GENERAL Fund $44,190.00 $44,190.00 Total $44,190.00 $44,190.00 Page 186 of 266 Ordinance – 2025 – 2026 Operating Budget Amendment - 2 Version 3.6.26 Section 2. That the additions in appropriations and expenditures are hereby declared to exist in the above funds for the said uses and purposes as shown above, and the proper City officials are hereby authorized and directed to issue warrants and transfer funds in accordance with the provision of the Ordinance. Section 3. Except as amended herein, Ordinance No. 4749 as previously adopted heretofore shall remain unchanged. Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this ordinance. Section 5. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including scrivener’s errors or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage, and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of _____, 2026. Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Krystle Shanks Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC Deputy City Clerk City Attorney Published: _____________________________ Page 187 of 266 Pasco City Council April 24, 2026 DVHRT Investigator Grant ProposalPa g e 1 8 8 o f 2 6 6 DVHRT Investigator Grant Proposal Transition from prior Domestic Violence Advocate model (ended Jan 2025) Implementation of DA-LE (Danger Assessment for Law Enforcement) Creation of Domestic Violence High Risk Team (DVHRT) Gap identified: No dedicated investigator for high-risk casesPa g e 1 8 9 o f 2 6 6 DVHRT Investigator Role •Sworn investigator dedicated to high-risk domestic violence cases •Conducts trauma-informed investigations •Investigates intimate partner sexual assaults •Uses lethality assessment tools (DA-LE) •Coordinates with DVHRT partners Pa g e 1 9 0 o f 2 6 6 Expected Public Safety Impact •Reduced repeat domestic violence incidents •Reduced risk of intimate partner homicide (IPH) •Increased arrests and case follow-through •Improved victim safety and service connection •Performance tracked via DA-LE and case metrics Pa g e 1 9 1 o f 2 6 6 Grant Funding Opportunity •Funding Source: WA Office of Crime Victim Advocacy (OCVA) •Amount: Up to $44,190.00 •Duration: Through June 30, 2026 •Covers investigator wages (reimbursement) •Request: Approve implementation of DVHRT Investigator position Pa g e 1 9 2 o f 2 6 6 Questions? Pa g e 1 9 3 o f 2 6 6 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 21, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/27/26 FROM: Brent Cook, Police Chief Police Department SUBJECT: Resolution - Interlocal Agreement with Franklin County for Jail Services (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Previous Interlocal Agreement (2020-2023) 2. County Proposed Interlocal Agreement 3. City Proposed Interlocal Agreement (with additional language) 4. Draft Resolution II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion only. Staff is seeking Council feedback and direction on the proposed Interlocal Agreement options prior to bringing a final agreement for approval. III. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed Interlocal Agreement includes updated daily housing rates and booking fees for City prisoners. The County’s proposed rates increase annually through 2027. In addition to rate increases, medical cost responsibility and billing practices may significantly impact overall costs to the City, depending on the final agreement structure and implementation. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background The City of Pasco relies on the Franklin County Corrections Center to house individuals arrested by the Pasco Police Department, as the City does not operate its own jail facility. The prior Interlocal Agreement (ILA), effective January 1, 2020 through Page 194 of 266 December 31, 2023, has expired. The City and County have continued operating under prior terms while negotiating a new agreement. During negotiations, several areas of the agreement have been discussed, including: Medical cost responsibility Billing timelines and documentation Cost recovery efforts (insurance, Medicaid/Apple Health) Operational accountability and dispute processes To support a clear and informed discussion, staff has provided three versions of the ILA for Council review: 1. Previous ILA (2020–2023): Reflects the prior agreement structure, including language where the County assumed responsibility for certain medical during injuries accidental occurring (such costs as incarceration). 2. County Proposed ILA: Updates rates and simplifies medical cost responsibility, generally placing responsibility for inmate medical costs on the City unless County negligence can be demonstrated. 3. City Proposed ILA (with additional language): Retains the County’s general framework but adds provisions to improve: a. Billing timelines b. Supporting documentation requirements c. Verification of cost recovery efforts d. Ability for the City to review and dispute charges e. Accountability mechanisms tied to performance Impact (other than fiscal) Maintaining an agreement with Franklin County is critical to ensuring uninterrupted jail services and supporting public safety operations. Key non-fiscal considerations include: Operational Continuity: Ensures the City can continue to house inmates without disruption Regional Partnership: Maintains coordination between City and County law enforcement Accountability & Transparency: Clarifies expectations related to billing, documentation, and cost recovery Risk Management: Addresses how medical costs and liability are managed while inmates are in County custody V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation No formal recommendation at this time. Staff is requesting Council feedback on Page 195 of 266 the three ILA options and direction on preferred approach. Constraints (time or other considerations) The prior agreement has expired Continued delays may impact cost tracking, billing clarity, and operational certainty The City must maintain access to jail services Next Steps Receive Council feedback and direction at Workshop Continue discussions with Franklin County based on Council input Return to Council with a final proposed agreement and resolution for approval Alternatives Direct staff to proceed with the County’s proposed ILA Direct staff to pursue inclusion of additional City protections and language Direct staff to explore alternative jail service options Take no action at this time Page 196 of 266 FRANKLIN COUNTY RESOLUTION 2020-27-3 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN FRANKLIN COUNTY AND THE CITY OF PASCO, SO THAT THE COMMISSIONERS MAY SIGN THE AGREEMENT FOR USE OF THE JAIL SERVICES AND CONFINEMENT OF CITY PRISONERS AT THE FRANKLIN COUNTY CORRECTIONS CENTER WHEREAS, both parties wish to renew the Agreement for use of the jail facilities as a place for the City of Pasco to confine inmates in accordance with the law and said agreement and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of Franklin County Commissioners, Franklin County Washington, hereby approves and is authorized to sign the attached Agreement for mutual Use of Jail Facilities between Franklin County and The City of Pasco for the period of this agreement, effective 4 years from January 2020 through December 31 2023. This Agreement may be renewed for successive periods of one year by written mutual agreement executed by all parties hereto. APPROVED this 24 day of 9O M&A 2020. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON Chair Brad Peck Approved Telephonlcalhf ra Pro Te er ATTEST: Clerk to the Board ION\ Page 197 of 266 AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between FRANKLIN COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter "County") and the City of PASCO, WASHINGTON, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"). For and in consideration of the conditions, covenants, and agreements contained herein the parties agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE The City, desiring to utilize Franklin County Jail (hereinafter "jail") facilities and services, for the incarceration of City prisoners, in accordance with the Interlocal Cooperation Act (Chapter 39.34 RCW) and the City and County Jails Act Chapter 70.48 RCW), hereby enters into an agreement with Franklin County for use of the County jail facility and services for confinement of City prisoners. It is the purpose of this agreement to provide for the joint use by the parties of the jail facilities and services at the jail located at the Franklin County Justice Center. 2. DEFINITIONS a) "Franklin County Custody Budget" shall mean all expenditure items in such budget. b) "City Prisoner" shall mean a person who is booked into the jail pursuant to an arrest by a City police officer for the commission of a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor, which could be booked as a violation of a City ordinance. For the term of this agreement, should the City choose to repeal any or all of its ordinance provisions which give rise to potential City jail time, such action will have no bearing on the computation of City prisoner days as defined below. c) "City Prisoner Day" shall mean any portion of a consecutive 24-hour period that a City Prisoner is in the custody at the County jail and shall include when a City Prisoner is only booked and released, as calculated using Intergraph Jail Management System (ILEADS) or Tyler System methodology for counting jail days. After booking, the total elapsed time for each visit shall be calculated in minutes. At the time of release, the number of minutes will be divided by 1440 (the number of minutes in a day), and the resulting number will be rounded up. For example, if a City prisoner's stay is from 8:00 AM on January 1, 2020 to 1:00 PM on January 3, 2020, the total elapsed time would be 3,180 minutes. This is two days and five hours, and the number of City Prisoner Days would be three. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 1 Page 198 of 266 3. AVAILABILITY AT JAIL FACILITIES The jail facilities and services shall be available for confinement of City Prisoners held upon arrest, awaiting trial or case disposition, and/or serving sentences of jail terms on a space available basis; provided, confinement of City Prisoners will be given priority over confinement of Prisoners for jurisdictions from outside of Franklin County. 4. COMPENSATION FROM CITY The City shall pay the County as compensation for its provision of jail facilities and services as specified herein. a) For the 2020 calendar year, the fee for the City Prisoner Day will be seventy-three dollars and twenty-seven cents ($73.27) per day. The City shall pay to the County seventy-three dollars and twenty-seven cents per City Prisoner Day. b) For the 2021 calendar year, the fee for the City Prisoner Day will be seventy-six dollars and ninety-three cents ($76.93) per day. The City shall pay to the County seventy-six dollars and ninety-three cents per City Prisoner Day. c) For the 2022 calendar year, the fee for the City Prisoner Day will be eighty dollars and seventy-eight cents ($80.78) per day. The City shall pay to the County eighty dollars and seventy-eight cents per City Prisoner Day. d) For the 2023 calendar year, the fee for the City Prisoner Day will be eighty-five dollars and seventeen cents ($85.17) per day. The City shall pay to the County eighty-five dollars and seventeen cents per City Prisoner Day. e) For all Bookings, there will also be an initial forty-five dollars ($45.00) booking fee to cover the intake processing costs. 5. PAYMENT The County shall bill the City by submitting a monthly voucher to the City on or before the 15th of each month, for the number of City Prisoner Days in the preceding month. The City shall pay the County the compensation set forth in Section 4 hereof within thirty (30) days from receipt of such voucher. Account balances overdue thirty (30) days or more will be subject to a service charge of AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 2 Page 199 of 266 1% (one percent) per month (12% (twelve percent) per annum). Should it become necessary, all collection costs shall be paid by the City. 6. MEDICAL COSTS AND TREATMENT. a) The County shall have the right to refuse to accept a City prisoner who, at the time of delivery to the jail for confinement, is in need of medical attention, until the City has made arrangements satisfactory to the County, for such medical attention. b) The County will provide medical services for all City Prisoners within the jail in accordance with the policies and procedures adopted by the County. c) In the event a prisoner requires medication, medical care, or dental treatment that is not available in the health care program within the jail provided by the County, the City shall be responsible as follows: With respect to City Prisoners, the City shall reimburse the County for the cost of all medication, medical care, or dental treatment to the extent such costs are not paid by the prisoner, insurance, public assistance, or other sources, and for the cost of transportation to and from any health care facility that is outside the local area (Tri - Cities). ii. With respect to those prisoners who are not City Prisoners, as defined in Section 2, but who are confined on the basis of charges initiated by the City police officers, the City shall reimburse the County for the cost of all such medication, medical care, dental treatment, and transportation to and from any health care facility outside of the local area (Tri -Cities) that are incurred prior to the disposition of the charges by sentencing, or otherwise, to the extent that the cost is not paid by the prisoner, insurance, public assistance, or other sources. iii. The County shall promptly forward its written requests for reimbursement to the City within sixty (60) days of receipt of a medical billing statement, which shall be attached to such request, from a medical provider providing treatment under this section. Failure to timely submit reimbursement request shall be considered a waiver of the County's right to reimbursement for any medical expenses, dental expenses, or other costs incurred related to a prisoner's healthcare. d) The County agrees to use reasonable efforts to obtain reimbursement from the prisoner, insurance, public assistance, or other sources, for such costs of medication, and medical care, or dental treatment. The County AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 3 Page 200 of 266 shall, except in cases of emergency which prevent the County from providing advanced notification, notify the Chief of Police or designee whenever a City Prisoner requires such medication, medical care, or dental treatment, the cost of which is the responsibility of the City pursuant to this Agreement. The City agrees to provide to the County, when notified, written verification of any furlough/Personal Recognizance Court Order to release for the care or treatment for a City Prisoner. e) The County shall, subject to the City's notification required by subsection d) hereof, have the authority to make arrangements for medication, medical care, or dental treatment not available in the health care program within the jail. f) The County shall be responsible for all medical expenses resulting from accidental injuries incurred during the course of a City Prisoner's, and those who are confined on the basis of charges initiated by the City police officers, incarceration; provided, this subsection shall not relieve the City of its obligations to reimburse the County for medical expenses incurred in connection with any pre-existing medical condition that does not arise due to an accidental injury to a City Prisoner, and those who are confined on the basis of charges initiated by the City police officers, occurring during incarceration. The City shall not be responsible for medical expenses resulting from injuries incurred during the course of a City Prisoner's, and those who are confined on the basis of charges initiated by the City police officers, incarceration related to the intentional tort or criminal conduct of another. 7. TRANSPORTATION OF PRISONERS The City shall be responsible for all transportation cost associated with City Prisoners outside the local area (Tri -Cities), or the cost thereof if transportation is provided by the County at the applicable mileage reimbursement rate for private vehicle use set by the U.S. General Services Administration. The County reserves the right not to provide transportation of City Prisoners outside of the local area. 8. TRANSFER OF CUSTODY City or any law enforcement on behalf thereof delivering persons to the jail for confinement shall provide the County officer of the jail with an arrest warrant, citation, court order, other documentation, or a completed detention request form satisfactory to the County officer which indicates the legal basis for confinement of the person and, in the absence of such documentation, the County officer may refuse to accept the person for confinement. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 4 Page 201 of 266 The County may also refuse to accept any City Prisoner for confinement if, in its sole discretion, it would be inappropriate to accept such person for security, safety reasons, or any other reason which causes the Sheriff or his designee to conclude that it would be inappropriate for a particular person to be held in custody in the jail. Including but not limited to family, social, or employment relationships between the person arrested and one or more members of the correctional staff. a) City Police Officers delivering persons to the jail for confinement shall remain in the immediate presence of such person, and shall be responsible for such person in their sole custody until the County officer has accepted documentation for such person's confinement and physical custody of that person and has indicated that the City Police officer may leave. At such time, and only at such time, will the County have assumed custody of and responsibility for the person to be confined. b) City Prisoners shall be subject to all applicable rules, regulations, and standards governing the operation and security of the jail. All City officers delivering prisoners to the County jail shall comply with those rules, regulations, and standards. 9. ACCESS TO PRISONERS City Police Officers and investigators shall have the right to interview City Prisoners at any reasonable time within the jail. City Police Officers shall be afforded equal priority for the use of jail interview rooms with other departments, including the Franklin County Sheriff's Department. 10. POSTING OF BAIL The County shall serve as agent for the City in receipt of bail bonds or monies posted for City Prisoners. 11. SPECIAL PROGRAMS. a) Home Monitoring and Other Special off-site Programs: Prisoners participating in a home monitoring program, or any other program agreed in writing by the parties to be subject to this paragraph 11(a), shall not be included in the calculation of "City Prisoner Days" under paragraph 2(c) of this Agreement. The cost of providing home monitoring or any other agreed special program subject to this paragraph 11(a) shall AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 5 Page 202 of 266 be determined by the sentencing judge. The County shall use all best efforts to collect the cost of such special program from the City Prisoner, provided, in the event that a City Prisoner is determined by the sentencing judge to be indigent, as a matter of law, yet otherwise qualifies for such home monitoring or other special program and is unable to pay the entire cost of such special program, the City shall be responsible for the actual cost of providing such special program not paid by the City Prisoner. The County shall provide a monthly statement to the City regarding the City's obligation for payment for such special programs under this subsection. 12. RELEASE OR LEAVE OF CITY PRISONERS. City Prisoners shall be permitted to leave the jail only: a) Upon the authorized, written request of the City police; b) By order of the Court having jurisdiction of a City Prisoner and the matter for which such prisoner is being confined; c) For appearance by the prisoner in the Court in which the prisoner has been charged; d) In compliance with a valid writ of habeas corpus; e) For necessary medical or dental treatment or care not available within the jail; or f) When the prisoner has completed service of the sentence, the charge pending against the prisoner has been dismissed or bail or other satisfactory recognizance has been posted as required by the Court. 13. RECORDKEEPING The County, based on consultation with the City's Chief of Police, agrees to maintain a system of record keeping to document the booking and confinement of each City Prisoner in such style and manner as is equivalent to the County's records pertaining to its prisoners under the current ILEADS system or Tyler Software system. The County shall make copies of said records available upon request by the City. The City agrees to be bound by all applicable confidentiality laws regarding jail records. 14. INDEMNIFICATION. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 6 Page 203 of 266 a) The City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County and its officers, agents, and employees, to the extent of the City's negligence, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever resulting from, arising out of or incident to any act or omission of the City, its officers, agents, or employees, in the performance of this Agreement or in arresting, detaining, charging, transporting, interrogating, or otherwise dealing with persons either before or after presentation to and acceptance by the County for confinement in the jail. With respect to the performance of this Agreement and as to claims against the County, its officers, agents, and employees, the City expressly waives its immunities under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington, the Industrial Insurance Act, for injuries to its employees and agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on behalf of any employee of the City. This waiver is mutually negotiated by the parties. In the event that any suit based upon such a claim, action, loss, cost, expense, or damage is brought against the County, the City shall defend the County at its sole cost and expense; provided, that the County retains the right to participate in any such suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved. If final judgment is entered against the County, or its officers, agents, or employees, the City shall satisfy the same in full. b) The County shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents, and employees, to the extent of the County's negligence, from and against any and all damages of any nature whatsoever resulting from and against any and all damages of any nature whatsoever resulting from, arising out of or incident to any act or omission of the County, its officers, agents, or employees, in the performance of this Agreement or in confining persons who have been presented by the City to and accepted by the County for confinement in the jail while said persons are in the jail or in the custody of the County outside the jail. In the event any suit based upon such a claim, action, loss, cost, expense or damage is brought against the City, the County shall defend the City at its sole cost and expense; provided that the City retains the right to participate in such suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved. If final judgment be rendered against the City or its officers, agents or employees the County shall satisfy the same in full. 15. NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 7 Page 204 of 266 It is the policy of Franklin County that no person shall be subjected to discrimination by the County or by its contractors because of age, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, race, creed, color, national origin, honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained guide dog or service animal by a person with a disability, or any other legally protected status. 16. AUTHORITY This Agreement is executed in accordance with the authority of RCW 70.48.090 and Chapter 39.34 RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act. The following information is given pursuant to the provisions of RCW 39.34.030: a) The duration of this Agreement shall be four years. b) The purpose of this Agreement is to permit the joint use of the Franklin County Corrections Center for confinement of prisoners of the parties to the Agreement thereby promoting maximum use and efficiency of the Franklin County Corrections Center. c) Termination of this Agreement shall be as provided in Section 20 hereof. d) This Agreement shall be administered as provided in Section 17 hereof. e) Unless otherwise specifically agreed by the parties in writing, all property, personal and real, utilized by the parties hereto in the execution of this agreement shall remain the property of that party initially owning it. f) Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the City from maintaining and utilizing its own holding facilities or contracting with another jurisdiction. 17. ADMINISTRATION This Agreement shall be administered by the Franklin County Sheriff or Franklin County designee. 18. REMEDIES No waiver of any right under this Agreement shall be effective unless made in writing by the authorized representative of the party to be bound thereby. Failure to insist upon full performance on any occasion shall not constitute consent to or waiver of any continuation of nonperformance or any later nonperformance; nor AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 8 Page 205 of 266 does payment of a billing or continued performance after notice of a deficiency in performance constitutes acquiescence thereto. 19. DURATION Upon its effective date, this agreement supersedes the prior Agreement for Use of Jail Facilities between the parties. This agreement shall be effective for four 4) years, from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2023. It may be renewed for a period of one year by written mutual agreement, provided the parties provide one another with at least sixty (60) days advance written notice. 20. TERMINATION This agreement may be terminated prior to the end of its term by either party for cause upon not less than ninety (90) days advance written notice. Said notice shall set forth the basis for termination. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 9 Page 206 of 266 CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Franklin County, Washington By: ., Dave Zabell, efty Mariager Robert E. Koch, Chairman By:2) Debra Barham, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS O FORM: Kerr erguson Law, PLLC City Attorney Brad Peck Approved Telephonically 8'4d Peck Ch Pro Tern ffit Didler, Member ATTEST BY: Ulf Clerk oftofthe Board APPROVED A4 TO CONTENT: 7 Jim ReYM and Sheriff APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: - — JenOerJo—hnson Deputy Prosecuting Attorney 2020-27.3 AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES -10 Page 207 of 266 AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 1 AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between FRANKLIN COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter "County") and the City of PASCO, WASHINGTON, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"). For and in consideration of the conditions, covenants, and agreements contained herein the parties agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE The City, desiring to utilize Franklin County Jail (hereinafter "jail") facilities and services, for the incarceration of City prisoners, in accordance with the Interlocal Cooperation Act (Chapter 39.34 RCW) and the City and County Jails Act (Chapter 70.48 RCW), hereby enters into an agreement with Franklin County for use of the County jail facility and services for confinement of City prisoners. It is the purpose of this agreement to provide for the joint use by the parties of the jail facilities and services at the jail located at the Franklin County Justice Center. 2. DEFINITIONS (a) "Franklin County Custody Budget" shall mean all expenditure items in such budget. (b) "City Prisoner" shall mean a person who is booked into the jail pursuant to an arrest by a City police officer for the commission of a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor, which could be booked as a violation of a City ordinance. For the term of this agreement, should the City choose to repeal any or all of its ordinance provisions which give rise to potential City jail time, such action will have no bearing on the computation of City prisoner days as defined below. (c) "City Prisoner Day" shall mean any portion of a consecutive 24-hour period that a City Prisoner is in the custody.at the County jail and shall include when a City Prisoner is only booked and released, as calculated using Intergraph Jail Management System or Tyler System methodology for counting jail days. After booking, the total elapsed time for each visit shall be calculated in minutes. At the time of release, the number of minutes will be divided by 1440 (the number of minutes in a day), and the resulting number will be rounded up. For example, if a City prisoner's stay is from 8:00 AM on January 1, 2024 to 1:00 PM on January 3, 2024, the total elapsed time would be 3,180 minutes. This is two days and five hours, and the number of City Prisoner Days would be three. Page 208 of 266 AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 2 3. AVAILABILITY AT JAIL FACILITIES The jail facilities and services shall be available for confinement of City Prisoners held upon arrest, awaiting trial or case disposition, and/or serving sentences of jail terms on a space available basis; provided, confinement of City Prisoners will be given priority over confinement of Prisoners for jurisdictions from outside of Franklin County. 4. COMPENSATION FROM CITY The City shall pay the County as compensation for its provision of jail facilities and services as specified herein. (a) For the 2025 calendar year, the fee for the City Prisoner Day will be on Hundred and one dollars ($101.00) per day. The City shall pay to the County one hundred and one dollars per City Prisoner Day. (b) For the 2026 calendar year, the fee for the City Prisoner Day will be One hundred and four dollars($104.00) per day. The City shall pay to the County one hundred and four dollars per City Prisoner Day. (c) For the 2027 calendar year, the fee for the City Prisoner Day will be one hundred and seven dollars and twelve cents ($107.12) per day. The City shall pay to the County one hundred and seven dollars and twelve cents per City Prisoner Day. (d) For all Bookings, there will also be an initial one hundred dollars ($100.00) booking fee to cover the intake processing costs. 5. PAYMENT The County shall bill the City by submitting a monthly voucher to the City on or before the 15th of each month, for the number of City Prisoner Days in the preceding month. The City shall pay the County the compensation set forth in Section 4 hereof within thirty (30) days from receipt of such voucher. Account balances overdue thirty (30) days or more will be subject to a service charge of Page 209 of 266 1% (one percent) per month (12% (twelve percent) per annum). Should it become necessary, all collection costs shall be paid by the City. 6. MEDICAL COSTS AND TREATMENT. (a) The County shall have the right to refuse to accept a City prisoner who, at the time of delivery to the jail for confinement, is in need of medical attention, until the City has made arrangements satisfactory to the County, for such medical attention. (b) The County will provide medical services for all City Prisoners within the jail in accordance with the policies and procedures adopted by the County. (c) In the event a prisoner requires medication, medical care, or dental treatment that is not available in the health care program within the jail provided by the County, the City shall be responsible as follows: i. With respect to City Prisoners, the City shall reimburse the County for the cost of all medication, medical care, or dental treatment to the extent such costs are not paid by the prisoner, insurance, public assistance, or other sources, and for the cost of transportation to and from any health care facility that is outside the local area (Tri- Cities). ii. With respect to those prisoners who are not City Prisoners, as defined in Section 2, but who are confined on the basis of charges initiated by the City police officers, the City shall reimburse the County for the cost of all such medication, medical care, dental treatment, and transportation to and from any health care facility outside of the local area (Tri-Cities)to the extent that the cost is not paid by the prisoner, insurance, public assistance, or other sources. iii. The County shall promptly forward its written requests for reimbursement to the City within sixty (60) days of receipt of a medical billing statement or sixty (60) days after such medical bills are denied by insurance, public assistance, or other sources, whichever is later, which documentation shall be attached to such request, from a medical provider providing treatment under this section and any related denials from insurance or other sources. Failure to timely submit reimbursement request shall be considered a waiver of the County's right to reimbursement for any medical expenses, dental expenses, or other costs incurred related to a prisoner's healthcare to the extent such failure prejudices the rights of the City to collect such costs. (d) The County agrees to use reasonable efforts to obtain reimbursement from the prisoner, insurance, public assistance, or other sources, for such costs of medication, and medical care, or dental treatment. The County shall, except in cases of emergency which prevent the County from providing Page 210 of 266 advanced notification, notify the Chief of Police or designee whenever a City Prisoner requires such medication, medical care, or dental treatment, the cost of which is the responsibility of the City pursuant to this Agreement. The City agrees to provide to the County, when notified, written verification of any furlough/Personal Recognizance Court Order to release for the care or treatment for a City Prisoner. (e) The County shall, subject to the City's notification required by subsection (d) hereof, have the authority to make arrangements for medication, medical care, or dental treatment not available in the health care program within the jail. In the event the City does not timely respond to the County’s request, as determined by the County, it shall take any and all reasonably necessary measures to ensure the City Prisoner’s medical needs are addressed. Any such expenses shall be the responsibility of the City. (f) The City shall be responsible for promptly reimbursing the County for all medical expenses incurred during the course of a City Prisoner's stay at the County Jail. 7. TRANSPORTATION OF PRISONERS The City shall be responsible for all transportation cost associated with City Prisoners outside the local area (Tri-Cities), or the cost thereof if transportation is provided by the County at the applicable mileage reimbursement rate for private vehicle use set by the U.S. General Services Administration. The County reserves the right not to provide transportation of City Prisoners outside of the local area. 8. TRANSFER OF CUSTODY City or any law enforcement on behalf thereof delivering persons to the jail for confinement shall provide the County officer of the jail with an arrest warrant, citation, court order, other documentation, or a completed detention request form satisfactory to the County officer which indicates the legal basis for confinement of the person and, in the absence of such documentation, the County officer may refuse to accept the person for confinement. The County may also refuse to accept any City Prisoner for confinement if, in its sole discretion, it would be inappropriate to accept such person for security, safety reasons, or any other reason which causes the Sheriff or his designee to conclude that it would be inappropriate for a particular person to be held in custody in the jail. Including but not limited to family, social, or employment relationships between the person arrested and one or more members of the correctional staff. (a) City Police Officers delivering persons to the jail for confinement shall remain in the immediate presence of such person, and shall be responsible for such person in their sole custody until the County officer has accepted Page 211 of 266 documentation for such person's confinement and physical custody of that person and has indicated that the City Police officer may leave. At such time, and only at such time, will the County have assumed custody of and responsibility for the person to be confined. (b) City Prisoners shall be subject to all applicable rules, regulations, and standards governing the operation and security of the jail. All City officers delivering prisoners to the County jail shall comply with those rules, regulations, and standards. 9. ACCESS TO PRISONERS City Police Officers and investigators shall have the right to interview City Prisoners at any reasonable time within the jail. City Police Officers shall be afforded equal priority for the use of jail interview rooms with other departments, including the Franklin County Sheriff's Department. 10. POSTING OF BAIL The County shall serve as agent for the City in receipt of bail bonds or monies posted for City Prisoners. 11. SPECIAL PROGRAMS (a) Home Monitoring and Other Special off-site Programs: Prisoners participating in a home monitoring program, or any other program agreed in writing by the parties to be subject to this paragraph 11(a), shall not be included in the calculation of "City Prisoner Days" under paragraph 2(c) of this Agreement. The cost of providing home monitoring or any other agreed special program subject to this paragraph 11(a) shall be determined by the sentencing judge. The County shall use all best efforts to collect the cost of such special program from the City Prisoner, provided, in the event that a City Prisoner is determined by the sentencing judge to be indigent, as a matter of law, yet otherwise qualifies for such home monitoring or other special program and is unable to pay the entire cost of such special program, the City shall be responsible for the actual cost of providing such special program not paid by the City Prisoner. The County shall provide a monthly statement to the City regarding the City's obligation for payment for such special programs under this subsection. 12. RELEASE OR LEAVE OF CITY PRISONERS. City Prisoners shall be permitted to leave the jail only: Page 212 of 266 (a) Upon the authorized, written request of the City police; (b) By order of the Court having jurisdiction of a City Prisoner and the matter for which such prisoner is being confined; (c) For appearance by the prisoner in the Court in which the prisoner has been charged; (d) In compliance with a valid writ of habeas corpus; (e) For necessary medical or dental treatment or care not available within the jail; or (f) When the prisoner has completed service of the sentence, the charge pending against the prisoner has been dismissed or bail or other satisfactory recognizance has been posted as required by the Court. 13. RECORDKEEPING The County, based on consultation with the City's Chief of Police, agrees to maintain a system of record keeping to document the booking and confinement of each City Prisoner in such style and manner as is equivalent to the County's records pertaining to its prisoners under the current ILEADS system or Tyler Software system. The County shall make copies of said records available upon request by the City. The City agrees to be bound by all applicable confidentiality laws regarding jail records. 14. INDEMNIFICATION (a) The City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County and its officers, agents, and employees, to the extent of the City's negligence, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever resulting from, arising out of or incident to any act or omission of the City, its officers, agents, or employees, in the performance of this Agreement or in arresting, detaining, charging, transporting, interrogating, or otherwise dealing with persons either before or after presentation to and acceptance by the County for confinement in the jail. With respect to the performance of this Agreement and as to claims against the County, its officers, agents, and employees, the City expressly waives its immunities under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington, the Industrial Insurance Act, for injuries to its employees and agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on behalf of any employee of the City. This waiver is mutually negotiated by the parties. In the event that any suit based upon such a claim, action, loss, cost, Page 213 of 266 expense, or damage is brought against the County, the City shall defend the County at its sole cost and expense; provided, that the County retains the right to participate in any such suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved. If final judgment is entered against the County, or its officers, agents, or employees, the City shall satisfy the same in full. (b) The County shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all damages of any nature whatsoever resulting from and against any and all damages of any nature whatsoever resulting from, arising out of or incident to any act or omission of the County, its officers, agents, or employees, in the performance of this Agreement or in confining persons who have been presented by the City to and accepted by the County for confinement in the jail while said persons are in the jail or in the custody of the County outside the jail. In the event any suit based upon such a claim, action, loss, cost, expense or damage is brought against the City, the County shall defend the City at its sole cost and expense; provided that the County retains the right to participate in such suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved. If final judgment be rendered against the City or its officers, agents or employees the County shall satisfy the same in full. 15. NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY It is the policy of Franklin County that no person shall be subjected to discrimination by the County or by its contractors because of age, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, race, creed, color, national origin, honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained guide dog or service animal by a person with a disability, or any other legally protected status. 16. AUTHORITY This Agreement is executed in accordance with the authority of RCW 70.48.090 and Chapter 39.34 RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act. The following information is given pursuant to the provisions of RCW 39.34.030: (a) The duration of this Agreement shall be four years. (b) The purpose of this Agreement is to permit the joint use of the Franklin County Corrections Center for confinement of prisoners of the parties to the Agreement thereby promoting maximum use and efficiency of the Franklin County Corrections Center. (c) Termination of this Agreement shall be as provided in Section 20 hereof. Page 214 of 266 (d) This Agreement shall be administered as provided in Section 17 hereof. (e) Unless otherwise specifically agreed by the parties in writing, all property, personal and real, utilized by the parties hereto in the execution of this agreement shall remain the property of that party initially owning it. (f) Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the City from maintaining and utilizing its own holding facilities or contracting with another jurisdiction. 17. ADMINISTRATION This Agreement shall be administered by the Franklin County Chief of Corrections or Franklin County’s designee. 18. REMEDIES No waiver of any right under this Agreement shall be effective unless made in writing by the authorized representative of the party to be bound thereby. Failure to insist upon full performance on any occasion shall not constitute consent to or waiver of any continuation of nonperformance or any later nonperformance; nor does payment of a billing or continued performance after notice of a deficiency in performance constitutes acquiescence thereto. 19. DURATION Upon its effective date, this agreement supersedes the prior Agreement for Use of Jail Facilities between the parties. This agreement shall be effective for three (3) years, from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2027. It may be renewed for a period of one year by written mutual agreement, provided the parties provide one another with at least sixty (60) days advance written notice. 20. TERMINATION This agreement may be terminated prior to the end of its term by either party for cause upon not less than ninety (90) days advance written notice. Said notice shall set forth the basis for termination. Date: Date: CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON Harold L. Stewart II, City Manager Rocky Mullen, Chairman Page 215 of 266 Franklin County Commissioner Clint Didier, Chairman Pro-Tem Franklin County Commissioner Stephen Bauman, Member Franklin County Commissioner Attest: Attest: Krystle Shanks, City Clerk Clerk of the Board APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Brent Cook Keilen Harmon Interim Chief of Police Corrections Department Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ogden Murphy Wallace PLLC Daniel Stovern City Attorney Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Page 216 of 266 AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 1 AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between FRANKLIN COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter "County") and the City of PASCO, WASHINGTON, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"). For and in consideration of the conditions, covenants, and agreements contained herein the parties agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE The City, desiring to utilize Franklin County Jail (hereinafter "jail") facilities and services, for the incarceration of City prisoners, in accordance with the Interlocal Cooperation Act (Chapter 39.34 RCW) and the City and County Jails Act (Chapter 70.48 RCW), hereby enters into an agreement with Franklin County for use of the County jail facility and services for confinement of City prisoners. It is the purpose of this agreement to provide for the joint use by the parties of the jail facilities and services at the jail located at the Franklin County Justice Center. 2. DEFINITIONS (a) "Franklin County Custody Budget" shall mean all expenditure items in such budget. (b) "City Prisoner" shall mean a person who is booked into the jail pursuant to an arrest by a City police officer for the commission of a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor, which could be booked as a violation of a City ordinance. For the term of this agreement, should the City choose to repeal any or all of its ordinance provisions which give rise to potential City jail time, such action will have no bearing on the computation of City prisoner days as defined below. (c) "City Prisoner Day" shall mean any portion of a consecutive 24-hour period that a City Prisoner is in the custody.at the County jail and shall include when a City Prisoner is only booked and released, as calculated using Intergraph Jail Management System or Tyler System methodology for counting jail days. After booking, the total elapsed time for each visit shall be calculated in minutes. At the time of release, the number of minutes will be divided by 1440 (the number of minutes in a day), and the resulting number will be rounded up. For example, if a City prisoner's stay is from 8:00 AM on January 1, 2024 to 1:00 PM on January 3, 2024, the total elapsed time would be 3,180 minutes. This is two days and five hours, and the number of City Prisoner Days would be three. Page 217 of 266 AGREEMENT FOR USE OF JAIL FACILITIES - 2 3. AVAILABILITY AT JAIL FACILITIES The jail facilities and services shall be available for confinement of City Prisoners held upon arrest, awaiting trial or case disposition, and/or serving sentences of jail terms on a space available basis; provided, confinement of City Prisoners will be given priority over confinement of Prisoners for jurisdictions from outside of Franklin County. 4. COMPENSATION FROM CITY The City shall pay the County as compensation for its provision of jail facilities and services as specified herein. (a) For the 2025 calendar year, the fee for the City Prisoner Day will be on Hundred and one dollars ($101.00) per day. The City shall pay to the County one hundred and one dollars per City Prisoner Day. (b) For the 2026 calendar year, the fee for the City Prisoner Day will be One hundred and four dollars($104.00) per day. The City shall pay to the County one hundred and four dollars per City Prisoner Day. (c) For the 2027 calendar year, the fee for the City Prisoner Day will be one hundred and seven dollars and twelve cents ($107.12) per day. The City shall pay to the County one hundred and seven dollars and twelve cents per City Prisoner Day. (d) For all Bookings, there will also be an initial one hundred dollars ($100.00) booking fee to cover the intake processing costs. 5. PAYMENT The County shall bill the City by submitting a monthly voucher to the City on or before the 15th of each month, for the number of City Prisoner Days in the preceding month. The City shall pay the County the compensation set forth in Section 4 hereof within thirty (30) days from receipt of such voucher. Account balances overdue thirty (30) days or more will be subject to a service charge of Page 218 of 266 1% (one percent) per month (12% (twelve percent) per annum). Should it become necessary, all collection costs shall be paid by the City. 6. MEDICAL COSTS AND TREATMENT. (a) The County shall have the right to refuse to accept a City prisoner who, at the time of delivery to the jail for confinement, is in need of medical attention, until the City has made arrangements satisfactory to the County, for such medical attention. (b) The County will provide medical services for all City Prisoners within the jail in accordance with the policies and procedures adopted by the County. (c) In the event a prisoner requires medication, medical care, or dental treatment that is not available in the health care program within the jail provided by the County, the parties agree to the following: i. With respect to City Prisoners, the City shall reimburse the County for the cost of all medication, medical care, or dental treatment to the extent such costs are not paid by the prisoner, insurance, public assistance, or other sources, and for the cost of transportation to and from any health care facility that is outside the local area (Tri- Cities). ii. With respect to those prisoners who are not City Prisoners, as defined in Section 2, but who are confined on the basis of charges initiated by the City police officers, the City shall reimburse the County for the cost of all such medication, medical care, dental treatment, and transportation to and from any health care facility outside of the local area (Tri-Cities)to the extent that the cost is not paid by the prisoner, insurance, public assistance, or other sources. iii. The County shall pursue coverage for treatment and/or reimbursement for treatment costs from all available sources prior to billing the City for such costs. The County shall, within 10 days of a request from the City, provide all documentation evidencing efforts made to seek cover and/or reimbursement for treatment costs. iv. If, after City review of coverage and/or reimbursement documentation, the City identifies costs where the County did not seek all reasonable and available coverage or reimbursement, the City shall pay all undisputed amounts in a timely manner and the County shall complete the necessary coverage or reimbursement efforts. Once those efforts are undertaken, the County call resubmit the invoicing to the City along with documentation of such efforts. v. After receiving invoicing from the County the City may request from the County detailed documentation showing the incident report, Page 219 of 266 itemized billing, transport records, coverage and reimbursement requests and responses, and any other information pertaining to the billing. Such documentation shall be produced within 10 business days of the request from the City. If the City makes such request, the identified billing shall not become due until 30 days following receipt of such information. vi. The County shall promptly forward its written requests for reimbursement to the City within sixty (60) days of receipt of a medical billing statement or sixty (60) days after such medical bills are denied by insurance, public assistance, or other sources, whichever is later, which documentation shall be attached to such request, from a medical provider providing treatment under this section and any related denials from insurance or other sources. Failure to timely submit reimbursement request shall be considered a waiver of the County's right to reimbursement for any medical expenses, dental expenses, or other costs incurred related to a prisoner's healthcare to the extent such failure prejudices the rights of the City to collect such costs. (d) The County agrees to use reasonable efforts to obtain reimbursement from the prisoner, insurance, public assistance, or other sources, for such costs of medication, and medical care, or dental treatment. The County shall, except in cases of emergency which prevent the County from providing advanced notification, notify the Chief of Police or designee whenever a City Prisoner requires such medication, medical care, or dental treatment, the cost of which is the responsibility of the City pursuant to this Agreement. The City agrees to provide to the County, when notified, written verification of any furlough/Personal Recognizance Court Order to release for the care or treatment for a City Prisoner. (e) The County shall, subject to the City's notification required by subsection (d) hereof, have the authority to make arrangements for medication, medical care, or dental treatment not available in the health care program within the jail. In the event the City does not timely respond to the County’s request, as determined by the County, it shall take any and all reasonably necessary measures to ensure the City Prisoner’s medical needs are addressed. Any such expenses shall be the responsibility of the City. (f) The City shall be responsible for promptly reimbursing the County for all medical expenses incurred during the course of a City Prisoner's stay at the County Jail. (g) The parties agree to meet twice per year to review medical expense processing procedures. The purpose of the review is to ensure that all appropriate coverage and reimbursement procedures are being utilized on medical expenses prior to invoicing to the City. If processing procedures are identified by the City as not being utilized, the County shall resubmit existing expenses Page 220 of 266 using those procedures and shall use those procedures on future expenses. (h) Failure of the County to utilize all available coverage and reimbursement sources for City related medical expenses prior to invoicing the City, failure to provide requested documentation of such efforts, or failure to meet with the City twice per year shall each be deemed a material breach of this agreement and may, at the City’s discretion, be considered the basis for a for-cause termination of this agreement pursuant to Section 20. 7. TRANSPORTATION OF PRISONERS The City shall be responsible for all transportation cost associated with City Prisoners outside the local area (Tri-Cities), or the cost thereof if transportation is provided by the County at the applicable mileage reimbursement rate for private vehicle use set by the U.S. General Services Administration. The County reserves the right not to provide transportation of City Prisoners outside of the local area. 8. TRANSFER OF CUSTODY City or any law enforcement on behalf thereof delivering persons to the jail for confinement shall provide the County officer of the jail with an arrest warrant, citation, court order, other documentation, or a completed detention request form satisfactory to the County officer which indicates the legal basis for confinement of the person and, in the absence of such documentation, the County officer may refuse to accept the person for confinement. The County may also refuse to accept any City Prisoner for confinement if, in its sole discretion, it would be inappropriate to accept such person for security, safety reasons, or any other reason which causes the Sheriff or his designee to conclude that it would be inappropriate for a particular person to be held in custody in the jail. Including but not limited to family, social, or employment relationships between the person arrested and one or more members of the correctional staff. (a) City Police Officers delivering persons to the jail for confinement shall remain in the immediate presence of such person, and shall be responsible for such person in their sole custody until the County officer has accepted documentation for such person's confinement and physical custody of that person and has indicated that the City Police officer may leave. At such time, and only at such time, will the County have assumed custody of and responsibility for the person to be confined. (b) City Prisoners shall be subject to all applicable rules, regulations, and standards governing the operation and security of the jail. All City officers delivering prisoners to the County jail shall comply with those rules, regulations, and standards. Page 221 of 266 9. ACCESS TO PRISONERS City Police Officers and investigators shall have the right to interview City Prisoners at any reasonable time within the jail. City Police Officers shall be afforded equal priority for the use of jail interview rooms with other departments, including the Franklin County Sheriff's Department. 10. POSTING OF BAIL The County shall serve as agent for the City in receipt of bail bonds or monies posted for City Prisoners. 11. SPECIAL PROGRAMS (a) Home Monitoring and Other Special off-site Programs: Prisoners participating in a home monitoring program, or any other program agreed in writing by the parties to be subject to this paragraph 11(a), shall not be included in the calculation of "City Prisoner Days" under paragraph 2(c) of this Agreement. The cost of providing home monitoring or any other agreed special program subject to this paragraph 11(a) shall be determined by the sentencing judge. The County shall use all best efforts to collect the cost of such special program from the City Prisoner, provided, in the event that a City Prisoner is determined by the sentencing judge to be indigent, as a matter of law, yet otherwise qualifies for such home monitoring or other special program and is unable to pay the entire cost of such special program, the City shall be responsible for the actual cost of providing such special program not paid by the City Prisoner. The County shall provide a monthly statement to the City regarding the City's obligation for payment for such special programs under this subsection. 12. RELEASE OR LEAVE OF CITY PRISONERS. City Prisoners shall be permitted to leave the jail only: (a) Upon the authorized, written request of the City police; (b) By order of the Court having jurisdiction of a City Prisoner and the matter for which such prisoner is being confined; (c) For appearance by the prisoner in the Court in which the prisoner has been charged; (d) In compliance with a valid writ of habeas corpus; Page 222 of 266 (e) For necessary medical or dental treatment or care not available within the jail; or (f) When the prisoner has completed service of the sentence, the charge pending against the prisoner has been dismissed or bail or other satisfactory recognizance has been posted as required by the Court. 13. RECORDKEEPING The County, based on consultation with the City's Chief of Police, agrees to maintain a system of record keeping to document the booking and confinement of each City Prisoner in such style and manner as is equivalent to the County's records pertaining to its prisoners under the current ILEADS system or Tyler Software system. The County shall make copies of said records available upon request by the City. The City agrees to be bound by all applicable confidentiality laws regarding jail records. 14. INDEMNIFICATION (a) The City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County and its officers, agents, and employees, to the extent of the City's negligence, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever resulting from, arising out of or incident to any act or omission of the City, its officers, agents, or employees, in the performance of this Agreement or in arresting, detaining, charging, transporting, interrogating, or otherwise dealing with persons either before or after presentation to and acceptance by the County for confinement in the jail. With respect to the performance of this Agreement and as to claims against the County, its officers, agents, and employees, the City expressly waives its immunities under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington, the Industrial Insurance Act, for injuries to its employees and agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on behalf of any employee of the City. This waiver is mutually negotiated by the parties. In the event that any suit based upon such a claim, action, loss, cost, expense, or damage is brought against the County, the City shall defend the County at its sole cost and expense; provided, that the County retains the right to participate in any such suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved. If final judgment is entered against the County, or its officers, agents, or employees, the City shall satisfy the same in full. (b) The County shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all damages of any nature whatsoever resulting from and against any and all damages of any nature whatsoever resulting from, arising out of or incident to any act Page 223 of 266 or omission of the County, its officers, agents, or employees, in the performance of this Agreement or in confining persons who have been presented by the City to and accepted by the County for confinement in the jail while said persons are in the jail or in the custody of the County outside the jail. In the event any suit based upon such a claim, action, loss, cost, expense or damage is brought against the City, the County shall defend the City at its sole cost and expense; provided that the City retains the right to participate in such suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved. If final judgment be rendered against the City or its officers, agents or employees the County shall satisfy the same in full. 15. NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY It is the policy of Franklin County that no person shall be subjected to discrimination by the County or by its contractors because of age, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, race, creed, color, national origin, honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained guide dog or service animal by a person with a disability, or any other legally protected status. 16. AUTHORITY This Agreement is executed in accordance with the authority of RCW 70.48.090 and Chapter 39.34 RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act. The following information is given pursuant to the provisions of RCW 39.34.030: (a) The duration of this Agreement shall be four years. (b) The purpose of this Agreement is to permit the joint use of the Franklin County Corrections Center for confinement of prisoners of the parties to the Agreement thereby promoting maximum use and efficiency of the Franklin County Corrections Center. (c) Termination of this Agreement shall be as provided in Section 20 hereof. (d) This Agreement shall be administered as provided in Section 17 hereof. (e) Unless otherwise specifically agreed by the parties in writing, all property, personal and real, utilized by the parties hereto in the execution of this agreement shall remain the property of that party initially owning it. (f) Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the City from maintaining and utilizing its own holding facilities or contracting with another jurisdiction. Page 224 of 266 17. ADMINISTRATION This Agreement shall be administered by the Franklin County Chief of Corrections or Franklin County’s designee. 18. REMEDIES No waiver of any right under this Agreement shall be effective unless made in writing by the authorized representative of the party to be bound thereby. Failure to insist upon full performance on any occasion shall not constitute consent to or waiver of any continuation of nonperformance or any later nonperformance; nor does payment of a billing or continued performance after notice of a deficiency in performance constitutes acquiescence thereto. 19. DURATION Upon its effective date, this agreement supersedes the prior Agreement for Use of Jail Facilities between the parties. This agreement shall be effective for three (3) years, from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2027. It may be renewed for a period of one year by written mutual agreement, provided the parties provide one another with at least sixty (60) days advance written notice. 20. TERMINATION This agreement may be terminated prior to the end of its term by either party for cause upon not less than ninety (90) days advance written notice. Said notice shall set forth the basis for termination. Date: Date: CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON Harold L. Stewart II, City Manager Rocky Mullen, Chairman Franklin County Commissioner Clint Didier, Chairman Pro-Tem Franklin County Commissioner Stephen Bauman, Member Franklin County Commissioner Page 225 of 266 Attest: Attest: Debby Barham, City Clerk Clerk of the Board APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Brent Cook Keilen Harmon Interim Chief of Police Corrections Department Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ogden Murphy Wallace PLLC Daniel Stovern City Attorney Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Page 226 of 266 Resolution – ILA Between Franklin County and the City of Pasco for Jail Services 1 RESOLUTION NO. ____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN FRANKLIN COUNTY AND THE CITY OF PASCO FOR THE USE OF JAIL FACILITIES. WHEREAS, RCW 39.34, INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT, authorizes political subdivisions to jointly exercise their powers, privileges, or authorities with other political subdivisions of this state through the execution of an interlocal cooperative or interagency agreement; and, WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington (City), and Franklin County, Washington (County), previously entered into an interlocal agreement for the use of jail facilities effective January 1, 2020, which is now expired; and; and WHEREAS, the City and County desire to renew and update the Interlocal Agreement for Use of Jail Facilities, effective January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2027, to ensure the continued confinement and care of City prisoners in the Franklin County Jail located at the Franklin County Justice Center; and WHEREAS, the Interlocal Agreement establishes terms governing prisoner custody, transport, medical care, recordkeeping, indemnification, and administrative responsibilities between the City and County; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco has determined that entering into the updated Interlocal Agreement with Franklin County promotes continued operational efficiency, fiscal responsibility, and cooperative regional public safety services; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the Interlocal Agreement between Franklin County and the City of Pasco; a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A; and Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to sign and execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Pasco. Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately. Page 227 of 266 Resolution – ILA Between Franklin County and the City of Pasco for Jail Services 2 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____, 2025. _____________________________ Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Krystle Shanks Ogden Murphy Wallace P.L.L.C., City Clerk City Attorney Page 228 of 266 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 12, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/27/26 FROM: Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief Fire Department SUBJECT: Resolution - Amendment to Fire Department Facility Use Agreement (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Fire Department Facility Use Agreement 2. Resolution - Amendment to Fire Department Facility Use Agreement II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presentation. Staff will be asking for approval of the resolution at the next City Council Meeting. III. FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Pasco will be raising the monthly fee from $216.60 to $250.00 for two bay spaces and including an annual 3% monthly increase. The annual increase would go into effect January 1st of each year. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On December 13, 2016, the City of Pasco and Franklin County Fire District No. 3 (FCFD3) entered into a Facility Use Agreement, which allowed FCFD3 to use one bay space, located at 1208 Road 48, to store a Water Tender. The fee was set at $216.60 / month. FCFD3 would like to use another bay space at the same location to store a Breathing Support vehicle. This vehicle maintains a portable cascade system that is used to refill air cylinders for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA). This resource is used by Pasco Fire during extended fire incidents and allows us to remain on scene for the entire duration. Without this resource, crews would need to shuttle cylinders to a station with an SCBA refill compressor. After review of the current agreement, it was determined that several updates needed to take place. The following outlines these updates: Page 229 of 266 The monthly fee was increased to $250. An annual fee increase was implemented (3%). Language was added that ensures FCFD3 will keep the bays clean and they are responsible for any damage caused by the district. There are no Pasco Fire Department vehicles stored at this location and there will be no operational impact. V. DISCUSSION: Both the agencies have agreed to the updated language, which allows for a continued partnership while adjusting financial terms that are fair for the city. Page 230 of 266 JOINT RESOLUTION CITY OF PASCO RESOLUTION NO. _______ FRANKLIN COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. _______ . AMENDMENT TO FIRE DEPARTMENT FACILITY USE AGREEMENT This AMENDMENT to the Fire Department Facility Use Agreement (“Amendment”) is made this _____ day of __________ 2026, by and between the CITY OF PASCO, a Washington municipal corporation, hereinafter called “City”, and FRANKLIN COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 3, hereinafter called “District”. WHEREAS, the City and District entered into a Fire Department Facility Use Agreement on the 13th day of December 2016 (the “Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to modify the Agreement in order to include provisions which allow the District to store a Rescue/Breathing Support vehicle at the facility; NOW, THEREFRORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the parties agree that Section 2 and Section 3 of the Agreement are hereby modified as follows: 2. Responsibilities of City. City agrees to allow District the use of two (2) 15’ x 38’ bays within the facility designated by the City for the storage of District’s Water Tender and Rescue/Breathing Support vehicles. City also agrees to pay all necessary utilities associated with the fire station and to keep the storage bay in good working order. 3. Facility Fee and Payment Schedule/Responsibilities of the District. As consideration for the permission to use the bays for the storage of the Water Tender and Rescue/Breathing Support vehicle, District agrees to pay City rent in the amount of $250.00 per month, from the effective date until terminated. This payment shall increase by 3% on January 1st of each year. District agrees to pay City this rent monthly within 30 days of receipt of an invoice from City. District agrees to keep the bay clean and will be responsible for any damage caused by the District. IT IS FURTHER AGREED between the City and District that all other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged, except as expressly modified by this Amendment. Page 231 of 266 CITY OF PASCO FRANKLIN COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 3 By: __________________________ By: ____________________________ Name: HAROLD STEWART Name: TODD BLACKMAN Title: City Manager Title: Commission Chair Date: _________________________ Date: ___________________________ ATTEST: ATTEST: ______________________________ ______________________________ KRYSTLE SHANKS, City Clerk HEIDI ELLERD, Commission Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ ______________________________ DANIEL KENNY, City Attorney HEIDI ELLERD, District Attorney Page 232 of 266 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: City of Pasco WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Pasco, Washington 525 North 3rd Pasco WA 99301 FIRE DEPARTMENT FACILITY USE AGREEMENT THIS FIRE DEPARTMENT FACILITY USE AGREEMENT ("Agreement" is entered into this J,? day of Dycq wkte , 2016, between the City of Pasco, a Washington Municipal Corporation ("City") and Franklin County Fire Protection District No. 3 ("District") and. WHEREAS, City is the owner of a fire department facility ("the Facility") at 1208 Road 48, Pasco, Washington; and WHEREAS, District owns a Water Tender that is used to provide water to the areas without fire hydrants within the boundaries of the Franklin County Fire Protection District and the City of Pasco pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement between the District and City executed on the 21 st day of September, 2015. WHEREAS, District desires to utilize the Facility for storage purposes for its Water Tender, and WHEREAS, RCW 52.12.031 gives fire protection districts the authority to enter into this Agreement for storage purposes for its Water Tender, and WHEREAS, the parties agree that in carrying out the terms of this Agreement, a Water Tender stored indoors at the fire station located at 1208 Road 48 in Pasco, Washington, is in the best interest of public safety. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective on 2016, and shall continue until terminated according to the provisions of this Agreement. 1 Page 233 of 266 2. Responsibilities of City. City agrees to allow District the use of one 15' X 38" bay within the Facility designated by the City for the storage of District's Water Tender. City also agrees to pay all necessary utilities associated with the fire station and to keep the storage bay in good working order. 3. Facility Fee and Payment Schedule. As consideration for the permission to use the bay for the storage of the Water Tender, District agrees to pay to City rent in the amount of $216.60 per month from the effective date until terminated. District agrees to pay City this rent monthly within 30 days of receipt of an invoice from City. 4. Termination. Either party to this Agreement may terminate the Agreement at any time upon (30) days advance written notice prior to the end of the calendar month. 5. Indemnity and Hold Harmless. City agrees that it will protect, save, defend, hold harmless and indemnify District, its employees, volunteers, officers and agents from any and all demands, claims, judgments, or liability for loss or damage arising as a result of City's obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement, including accidents, injuries, or other occurrences, that arise out of the negligent acts or failure to act of City's employees, volunteers, officers and agents. District agrees that it will protect, save, defend, hold harmless and indemnify City, its employees, volunteers, officers and agents from any and all demands, claims, judgments, or liability for loss or damage arising as a result of District's obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement including accidents, injuries, or other occurrences, that arise out of the negligent acts or failure to act of District's employees, volunteers, officers and agents. District has inspected the Facility and finds it acceptable for its intended uses at the time of the execution of this Agreement, and accepts it in its present "as -in" condition without any warranties as to its suitability for the District's intended use. 6. Insurance. Each agency shall at all times carry liability insurance (or participate in self-insurance agreements) in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 covering all incidences caused by its own equipment or activities of its personnel related to the performance of this Agreement. 7. Limitation of Agreement. This Agreement is entered into for the benefit of the parties to this Agreement only. The Agreement is not intended to confer any benefit on any other parties and therefore no other or third party shall be entitled to rely on the terms of this Agreement or anticipate receipt of any benefit as a result of the performance of this Agreement. 2 Page 234 of 266 8. Notices. All notices, request, demands and other communications required by this Agreement shall be in writing and, except as expressly provided elsewhere in this Agreement, shall be deemed to have been served at the time of delivery if personally delivered or delivered, or at the time of mailing, if mailed by first class, postage prepaid, and addressed to the party at its address as stated in this Agreement, or at such other address as the party may designate at any time in writing to the other party. City of Pasco 525 N 3`d Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 Franklin County Fire Protection District #3 7809 Road 36 North Pasco, WA 99301 9. Assignment or Subletting: District is prohibited from either assigning or subletting all or any portion of the Facility during its use of the Facility. 10. Dispute Resolution. Except for the payment of rent, in the event of a dispute regarding the enforcement, breach or interpretation of this Agreement, the parties shall first meet in a good faith effort to resolve such dispute. In the event the dispute cannot be resolved by agreement of the parties, said dispute shall be resolved by arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, and the Mandatory Arbitration Rules (MAR); venue shall be placed in Franklin County, Washington, the laws of the State of Washington shall apply, and the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and costs. 11. Amendment. No modification, termination or amendment of this Agreement may be made except by written agreement signed by both parties hereto. 12. Severability. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. 13. Governing Law. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington, and the parties agree that in any such action venue shall lie exclusively in Franklin County, Washington. 14. Entire Agreement. The entire agreement between the parties hereto is contained in this Agreement and the exhibits hereto, and this Agreement supersedes all of their previous understandings and agreements, written and oral, with respect to this c Page 235 of 266 transaction. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument executed by the parties subsequent to the date hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. City of Pasco, Washin ton Franklin County Fire Protection Dis rict No. 3 By:Z & By: ` bave9ZTDrty Manger Title: ?s'IV Ch;&4' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss County of Franklin On this day personally appeared before me Dave Zabel], City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, to be known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. 0 GIVEN under my hand and official seal this /" day of , 2016. 1 A TONI L. ZUNKER NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 3, 2020 NOTARY PUBLI in AT Residing at 04-4 My Commission Expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss County of Franklin ) of Washington On this day personally appeared before me ON*, C' k6yr e' E{Ife C of Franklin County Fire Protection District No. 3, to be known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this I'2:K day of lorys.Qoa , 2016. Q oNt, NOTARY BIC in and for the e of Wash' ton r 6..•`' a o a l •,a 4., Residing at Pasco 6 r©taq'r' r Y ' * My Commission Expires 13 29 20 4 an Page 236 of 266 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 6, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/27/26 FROM: Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief Fire Department SUBJECT: Resolution - Termination of ILA between the City of Pasco and Walla Walla County Fire Protection District 5 for Advanced Life Support Services (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Interlocal Cooperation Agreement - City of Pasco and Walla Walla County Fire Protection District No. 5 2. Joint Resolution: Termination of Interlocal Agreement between City of Pasco and Wala Walla County Fire Protection District No. 5 for Advanced Life Support Services II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presentation. Staff will be asking for approval of the resolution at the next City Council Meeting. III. FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Pasco will not invoice Walla Walla Fire Protection District No. 5 for service. The current amount is $34,000 per year. Though there is a loss in revenue, there will be a savings in vehicle and equipment repairs and maintenance, along with a reduction in fuel costs related to responding into Burbank. The Pasco Fire Department will also increase service reliability by keeping crews available and ready to respond within city limits. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On November 17, 2008, the City of Pasco and Walla Walla County Fire Protection District No. 5 (WWCFPD5) entered into an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement. This agreement authorized the City of Pasco, pursuant to RCW 35A.18.010, medical emergency and Support Life Advanced provide to transport services to the residents within the jurisdictional boundaries of WWCFPD5. In return, the City of Pasco would invoice WWCFPD5 a set amount in June and December of that year. Page 237 of 266 In 2025, WWCFPD5 was able to staff their department to a level that allowed the district to provide for the medical services needed by their community. The services provided by the City of Pasco were no longer needed and WWCFPD5 asked to terminate the agreement. V. DISCUSSION: The termination of the agreement is supported by the Fire Chiefs of both agencies. Page 238 of 266 JOINT RESOLUTION WALLA WALLA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO.5 RESOLUTION NO.2026-2 CITY OF PASCO RESOLUTION NO. TERMINATION OF INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF PASCO AND WALLA WALLA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO.5 FOR ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 'day of ,2026,by and between the CITY OF PASCO,a Washington municipal corporation,hereinafter called “City”, and WALLA WALLA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO.5,hereinafter called “Fire District”.The parties are referenced herein as the “Agencies”. WHEREAS,the City and the Fire District entered into an Interlocal Agreement dated November 17,2008 (the “Agreement”)wherein the City agreed to provide Advanced Life Support (ALS)services to the Fire District;and WHEREAS,it has been determined by each of the parties hereto that it would be in the best interest of the parties to terminate the Agreement as the Agencies have determined that the Fire District now has the ability to provide ALS services within its boundaries. NOW,THEREFRORE,BE IT RESOLVED the Interlocal Agreement dated November 17,2008,between the City of Pasco and Walla Walla County Fire Protection District No.5 is terminated effective July I,2025. Page 239 of 266 APPROVED this _day of CITY OF PASCO By: — Name:HAROLD STEWART Title: Date: City Manager ATTEST: KRYSTLE SHANKS,City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: DANIEL KENNY,City Attorney ,2026.ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners this 9th day of February,2026. WALLA WALLA COUNTY FIRE Commissioner k Cowgi? er ATTEST: 7710/11W Heidi Ellerd,Commission Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Heidi Ellerd,District Attorney Page 240 of 266 Interlocal Cooperation Agreement City of Pasco and Walla Walla County Fire Protection District No. 5 BY THIS INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT entered into this day of 2008, between the City of Pasco, Washington, a Washington Municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City," and Walla Walla County Fire Protection District No. 5, a Washington Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Fire District," as authorized by Chapter 39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington, enter into the following Agreement: WHEREAS, the Fire District has heretofore determined that there is not an existing private ambulance service available to adequately provide for "911" dispatched emergency medical transport with Advanced Life Support(ALS) services to the District; and, WHEREAS, the Fire District is authorized pursuant to RCW 52.12.031 to enter into an agreement with the City to provide emergency medical transport services to the residents of the Fire District; and, WHEREAS, the City is authorized pursuant to RCW 35A.18.010 to provide emergency medical transport services by agreement to other jurisdictions; and, WHEREAS, the parties have determined that the rendering of emergency ALS medical transport services by the City to the Fire District, under the terms provided below, is in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of both the residents of the City and the Fire District; NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: Interlocal Agreement City of Pasco&Walla Walla Fire District No. 5 r(, Paee 1 of 5 Revised 10/24/2008 y Page 241 of 266 SECTION ONE PURPOSES The City shall make available emergency ALS medical transport services to the Fire District for the benefit of those requiring emergency ALS medical transport services within the Fire District's boundaries more particularly described on the map attached as Exhibit "A". Emergency medical transport services shall include vehicles and personnel appropriately equipped, manned and trained, meeting all City, State and Federal licenses necessary for the performance of services set forth in Section Two. SECTION TWO LEVEL OF SERVICES The City shall make available emergency ALS/Paramedic transport services within that portion of the territorial boundaries of the Fire District as illustrated in Exhibit "A" on a 24-hour per day, 7 days a week basis. The same level, priority and resources shall be extended to a call located within the Fire District as a call located within the City limits; provided, however, the Fire District shall bear full responsibility to determine whether an incident within its boundary requires ALS service. In such event, the Fire District shall advise Walla Walla County Dispatch with instructions to contact Franklin County Dispatch for emergency service from the city. The City will respond under the terms of this agreement only through emergency dispatch by Franklin County. The City shall provide personnel certified to ALS/Paramedic level at all times as defined in Chapter 18.71 RCW, to all trauma incidents, and medical problems where there is a potential loss of life (including but not limited to all mass-casualty incidents, multi-patient incidents, cardiac emergencies, pediatric emergencies, obstetrical emergencies, airway emergencies, seizures, poisonings, overdoses, diabetic emergencies, back pain, chest pain and burn emergencies), except those occasional situations where all ALS/Paramedics are committed to other EMS emergencies. The City shall maintain a paramedic at its Oregon Avenue station at all times, except those occasional situations where the City is prevented from doing so due to illness,vacations or Kelly days of assigned paramedics. Interlocal Agreement City of Pasco&Walla Walla Fire District No. 5 Paee 2 of 5 Revised 10/24/2008Page 242 of 266 SECTION THREE FUNDING The Fire District shall pay to the City the sum of TWENTY-FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS ($24,000.00) annually, payable in two installments of TWELVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($12,000.00) each due June 1 and December 1 of each year, and the City shall be entitled to charge and collect an emergency medical transport service fee to users or patients of the City's service within the Fire District and the City shall assume all responsibility for the billing and collection of such fees. Such fees and charges shall not exceed the City's "non- resident ambulance service charges" as established by City ordinance or resolution. After the Agreement has run for the first full year and any succeeding one (1) year period, the annual fee paid by the Fire District shall be increased in accordance with the following procedure. The annual fee paid by the Fire District in the most-recent year (current fee) shall be multiplied by a factor equal to the percentage change for the 12-month October Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), Pacific Cities, West-B/C, published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor. The resulting product shall be added to the current annual fee to establish the annual fee for the succeeding contract year. SECTION FOUR TERM OF AGREEMENT The initial term of this Agreement shall commence on the 1 S` day of January 2009 and terminate on the 315t day of December, 2011. This Agreement shall be automatically renewed for successive one-year terms thereafter, unless terminated by either party upon a one-year advanced written notice to the other party. Interlocal Agreement City of Pasco&Walla Walla Fire District No. 5 Paee 3 of 5 Revised 10/24/2008Page 243 of 266 r SECTION FIVE INDEMNIFICATION The City and the Fire District shall defend, indemnify and hold each other harmless from any claims, damages, causes of action, or judgments arising from, or as a direct result of the negligent or intentional acts of its respective agents, employees, or officers. SECTION SIX INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT PROVISION All vehicles, equipment, inventory and any improvements thereto shall remain the sole property of the City. All personnel utilized by the City in the fulfillment of this Agreement shall be solely within the supervision, direction and control of the City and shall not be construed as loan servants" or employees of the Fire District. All funding, incident to the fulfillment of the Interlocal Cooperative Agreement, shall be the sole responsibility of the City and no special budget or funds are anticipated nor shall be created. It is not the intention that a separate legal entity be established to conduct the cooperative undertaking nor is the acquiring, holding, or disposing of real or personal property anticipated. The City Fire Chief shall be designated as the Administrator of this Interlocal Cooperative Agreement. SECTION SEVEN DISPUTE RESOLUTION For the purpose of this Agreement, time is of the essence. Should any dispute arise concerning the enforcement, breach or interpretation of this Agreement, the parties shall first meet in a good faith attempt to resolve the dispute. In the event the dispute is not resolved, it shall be resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, and the Mandatory Rules of Arbitration (MAR); and venue shall be placed in Franklin County, Washington, the laws of the State of Washington shall apply, and the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and costs. Interlocal Agreement City of Pasco&Walla Walla Fire District No.5 Paee 4 of 5 Revised 10/24/2008Page 244 of 266 SECTION EIGHT ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. All items incorporated by reference are attached. No other understanding, verbal or otherwise, in regards to the subject matter of this Agreement, shall be deemed to exist. Any modifications to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties to be effective. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Interlocal Cooperative Agreement by the duly authorized officers on the day and year first written above. City of Pasco Walla Walla County Fire District No. 5 B , ' ,.Y• Joyc ls , Mayor Interlocal Agreement City of Pasco&Walla Walla Fire District No. 5 Paee 5 of 5 Revised 10/24/2008Page 245 of 266 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 12, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/27/26 FROM: Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief Fire Department SUBJECT: Resolution - Amendment to Interlocal Agreement between City of Pasco and Franklin County Fire District No. 3 Concerning the Exchange of Services and the Transfer of Assets Due to the Annexation of the Road 80 Area to the City (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Resolution - Amendment to Interlocal Agreement between City of Pasco and Franklin County Fire District No. 3 Concerning the Exchange of Services and the Transfer of Assets Due to the Annexation of the Road 80 Area to the City 2. Interlocal Agreement between City of Pasco and Franklin County Fire District No. 3 Concerning the Exchange of Services and the Transfer of Assets Due to the Annexation of the Road 80 Area to the City 3. Resolution 2938 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presentation. Staff will be asking for approval of the resolution at the next City Council Meeting. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On September 21, 2015, The City of Pasco and Franklin County Fire District No. 3 (FCFD3) entered into an Interlocal Agreement due to the annexation of property (Road 80 area) that was located in the Urban Growth Area of the City of Pasco. Due to the annexation, FCFD3 transferred the ownership of a building (4803 W Octave Street - old Fire Station) and a water tender and in return, the City of Pasco agreed to provide Advanced Emergency Medical Services within the Page 246 of 266 jurisdictional boundaries of FCFD3 at no cost to the district. Provision H. of the current ILA states, "This agreement is contingent upon the District becoming a signatory to the local Automatic Aid Agreement". In March of 2016, FCFD3 became part of the agreement and a signatory to the Master Mutual Aid Agreement (MMAA). V. DISCUSSION: With FCFD3 as a signatory to the MMAA, this ILA has become outdated. In addition to this, and with the recent increase in our Ambulance Utility Rate, we feel it is important to continue maintaining our services levels to those that live in the City of Pasco. As both agencies continue to grow, the Pasco Fire Department cannot maintain critical service levels to our community, as outlined in Resolution 2938, while also continuing to provide Advanced Emergency Medical Services to FCFD3. Both agencies agree to terminating this ILA. Page 247 of 266 JOINT RESOLUTION CITY OF PASCO RESOLUTION NO. _______ FRANKLIN COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. _______ . AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF PASCO AND FRANKLIN COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 3 CONCERNING THE EXCHANGE OF SERVICES AND THE TRANSFER OF ASSETS DUE TO THE ANNEXATION OF THE ROAD 80 AREA TO THE CITY This AMENDMENT to Interlocal Agreement between Franklin County Fire District No. 3 and the City of Pasco, Concerning the Exchange of Services and the Transfer of Assets Due to the Annexation of the Road 80 Area to the City (“Amendment”) is made and entered into this _____ day of _________, 2026, by and between the CITY OF PASCO, a Washington municipal corporation, hereinafter called “City”, and FRANKLIN COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 3, hereinafter referred to as the “District”. WHEREAS, the City and the District entered into the Interlocal Agreement between Franklin County Fire District No. 3 and the City of Pasco, Concerning the Exchange of Services and the Transfer of Assets Due to the Annexation of the Road 80 Area to the City on the 21st day of September 2015 (the “Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to modify the Agreement in order to remove provisions which are no longer relevant to the Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE; IT IS AGREED between the City and the District that the following Subsections 4.A.1 and 4.A.2 are hereby removed and omitted from the Agreement and 4B will now be 4A. IT IS FURTHER AGREED between the City and the District that all other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged, except as expressly modified by this Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands the day written below. Page 248 of 266 CITY OF PASCO FRANKLIN COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 3 By: __________________________ By: ____________________________ Name: HAROLD STEWART Name: TODD BLACKMAN Title: City Manager Title: Commission Chair Date: _________________________ Date: ___________________________ ATTEST: ATTEST: ______________________________ ______________________________ KRYSTLE SHANKS, City Clerk HEIDI ELLERD, Commission Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ ______________________________ DANIEL KENNY, City Attorney HEIDI ELLERD, District Attorney Page 249 of 266 WHEN RECORDED RETURNTO: AFNi11836355AGREE 10/15i201503:15 PMF'EO'DB'SiLzEs?sD arresting” PASCO,WA 99302 Franklin00..WA __——_—__—_————————— Name of document:lnterlocal Agreement Between Franklin County Fire District No.3 and the City of Pasco,concerning the exchange of services and the transfer of assets due to the Annexation of the Road 80 Area to the City Grantor:Franklin County Fire District No 3 Grantee:City of Pasco Page 250 of 266 Interlocal Agreement Between Franklin County Fire District No.3 and the City of Pasco, concerning the exchange of services and the transfer of assets due to the Annexation of the Road 80 Area to the City 5:THIS AGREEMENTis made and entered into this2_\day of (ZEMW 2015,by the Franklin County Fire District No.3 (“District”)and the City of Pasco (“City”),collectively referenced to as the “Parties”;pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW,the Interlocal Cooperation Act. WHEREAS,certain territories of the District are located within the Urban Growth Area of the City and some of said territories are bounded on all sides by the City;and WHEREAS,District provides ?re protection and basic emergency medical services (BEMS)to properties within the District and City provides fire protection and advanced emergency medical services (AEMS)to properties within the City;and WHEREAS,the District and City have determined that the transfer of assets and exchange of services is a reasonable way to ef?ciently and fairly provide for the transfer of jurisdiction from the District to the City while maintaining service levels and conserving taxpayer resources in anticipation of the annexationof the Road 80 Area by the City;and WHEREAS,the Parties desire to formalize their understanding and agreements in conjunction with the annexation process; NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein,the Districtand City agree as follows: 1.Purpose:The purpose of this agreement is to provide for the exchange of services between the District and the City and for the transfer of certain assets,pursuant to law,due to the annexation of the Road 80 Area by the City. 2.Effective Date and Term:This Agreement shall become effective on 2!,2015 and shall continue in force until terminated by mutual agreement or until either of the Parties gives advance written notice of termination of not lnterlocal Agreement —Franklin County Fire District No,3 and City of PascoS/Zl/ls Page 1 Page 251 of 266 less than one year.Such notice of termination may not be given within the ?rst Five years of this agreement,except for cause.The Parties agree to review the terms,conditionsand services covered by this agreement at least once every Five years beginning with the effective date.Renewal term negotiations should commence six months prior to the expiration of the above terms. 3.District Agrees to: A.Transfer the fee title ownership of its Fire Station on Road 48 (Exhibit “B”)to City,within 90 days of the effective date of this Agreement “as is” with no warranties.Transfer shall be in consideration and full satisfaction of District’s obligation to transfer a pro—rata share of its assets to City,per RCW 35A.14.400,pursuant to City’s annexation of the Road 80 Area. B.Transfer of ownership of a water tender,the ?nal speci?cations as per the current bid speci?cations that were provided to the District (any additional charges to be paid by the City),as additionalconsideration as provided in Section 4.B.as full settlement of the dispute between the Parties of the previous AEMS services provided by the City to the District residents.The City acknowledges receipt of the attached letter from the Stateof Washington,Department of Enterprise Services,and agrees to accept transfer of ownership of the water tender pursuant to the terms of that letter. C.Become a signatory agency to the local Automatic Aid Agreement in a fomi acceptable to the District and provide,when available,automatic aid services to the City at no cost for: 1.Water tender response; 2.Breathing air support; 3.Wild land ?re support;and 4.Such other like services as agreed to by the Fire Chiefs of the Parties. 4.City Agrees to: A.Provide automatic aid services at no cost to District for: 1.Advanced emergency medical services. lnterlocal Agreement e Franklin County Fire District No.3 and City of PascoS/Zl/l 5 Page 2 Page 252 of 266 2.For billable transport services,the City shall bill patients treated and/or transported in/from the District at the non-residentrate. B.Make payment to the District in an amount which represents the difference between the claimed costs of AEMS services as provided by the City to the District residents (up to the date of the execution of this Agreement);and the ?nal cost of the water tender,which amount shall be determined at the time of ?nal billing for the water tender.. 5.Annexation Contingency:This Agreement anticipates the effective date of the Road 80 Area Annexation to be July 1,2015.In the event that the annexation,for any cause whatsoever,is deemed to be invalid,this Agreement shall immediately be terminated and of no force and effect. 6.Indemni?cation: A.The District shall indemnify and hold the City and its agents, employees,and/or of?cers,harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense any and all claims,demands,suits,at law or equity,actions,penalties, losses,damages,or costs,of whatsoever kind or nature,brought against the City arising out of,in connection with,or incident to the execution of this Agreement and/or the District’s performance or failure to perform any aspect of this Agreement;provided,however,that if such claims are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of the City,its agents,employees,and/or of?cers,this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the District;and,provided further,that nothing herein shall require the District to hold harmless or defend the City,its agents,employees and/or officers from any claims arising from the sole negligence of the City,its agents, employees,and/or of?cers.No liability shall attach to the City by reason of entering into this Agreement except as expressly provided herein. B.The City shall indemnify and hold the District and its agents, employees,and/or of?cers,harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense any and all claims,demands,suits,at law or equity,actions,penalties, losses,damages,or costs,of whatsoever kind or nature,brought against the District arising out of,in connection with,or incident to the execution of this Agreement and/or the City’s performance or failure to perform any aspect of this Agreement; provided,however,that if such claims are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of the District,its agents,employees,and/or of?cers,this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the lnterlocal Agreement —Franklin County Fire District No.3 and City ofPascoS/Zl/lj Page 3 Page 253 of 266 City;and provided further,that nothing herein shall require the City to hold harmless or defend the District,its agents,employees and/or of?cers from any claims arising from the sole negligence of the District,its agents,employees,and/or of?cers.No liability shall attach to the District by reason of entering into this Agreement except as expressly provided herein. 7.Waiver of Subrogation:The District and the City hereby mutually release each other from liability and waive all right of recovery against each other for any loss caused by fire or other perils which can be insured against under ?re insurancecontract including any extended coverage endorsements thereto which are customarily available from time to time in the State of Washington,provided,that this paragraph shall be inapplicable to the extent that it would have the effect of invalidating any insurance coverage of the District or the City. 8.Compliance with Regulations and LawszThe Parties shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations pertaining to them in connection with the matters covered herein. 9.Assignment:The Parties shall not assign this Agreement or any interest, obligation or duty therein without the express written consent of the other Party. 10.Attorney’s Fees:lf either Party shall be required to bring any action to enforce any provision of this Agreement,or shall be required to defend any action brought by the other Party with respect to this Agreement,and in the further event that one Party shall substantially prevail in such action,the losing Party shall,in addition to all other payments required therein,pay all of the prevailing Party’s reasonable costs in connection with such action,including such sums as the court or courts may adjudge reasonable as attorney’s fees in the trial court and in any appellate courts. 11.Miscellaneous Provisions: A.All of the covenants,conditions and agreements in this Agreement shall extend to and bind the legal successors and assigns of the Parties hereto. B.This Agreement shall be deemed to be made and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. C.Unless otherwise speci?cally provided herein,no separate legal entity is created hereby,as each of the Parties is contracting in its capacity as a Intertocal Agreement —Franklin County Fire District No.3 and City of PascoX/Zl/IS Page 4 Page 254 of 266 municipal corporation of the State of Washington.The identity of the Parties hereto is as set forth herein above. D.The performances of the duties of the Parties provided hereby shall be done in accordance with standard operating procedures and customary practices of the Parties. E.The oversight and administrationof the Agreement shall be done by the Fire Chiefs of the respective Parties. F.No provision of this Agreement shall relieve either Party of its public agency obligations and/or responsibilities imposed by law. G.if any term or provision of this Agreement or the applicationthereof to any person or circumstance shall,to any extent,be held to be invalid or unenforceable by a ?nal decision of any court having jurisdiction on the matter,the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect,unless such court determines that such invalidity or unenforceability materially interferes with or defeats the purposes hereof,at which time the City and/or District shall have the right to terminate the Agreement. H.This Agreement is contingent upon the District becoming a signatory to the local Automatic Aid Agreement. I.In the event of a dispute arising regarding the breach,interpretation, or enforcement of this Agreement,the Parties shall ?rst meet in a good faith effort to resolve the dispute,either with or without the assistance of mediation,as the Parties may agree.In the event the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute by agreement,the dispute shall be resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04Awith both Parties waiving the right of a jury trial upon trial de novo,with venue placed in Pasco,Franklin County,Washington.The substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and costs as additional award and judgment against the other. J.Copies of this Agreement shall be ?led with the Franklin County Auditor’s Of?ce or posted on the websites of the respective Parties. lnterlocal Agreement —Franklin County Fire District No.3 and City ofPascoS/Zl/ls Page 5 Page 255 of 266 IN WITNESS HEREOF,the Parties have signed this Agreement. CITY OF PASCO FRANKLIN COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT 1 NO.3 W Dave Zabell, Eéamger‘Ron Shuck,Commission Chair A EST‘ATTEST: ebbie Clark,City Clerk Heidi Ellerd,CommissionSecretary APPROVED AS TO FORM:APPROVED AS TO FORM: Lee Kerr,City Attorney Heidi Ellerd,District Attorney lnterlocal Agreement ~Franklin County Fire District No.3 and City of PascoS/Z 1/15 Page 6 Page 256 of 266 Page 257 of 266 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENTOF ENTERPRISE SERVICES 7511 NewMarketSl/cet,Tumwaler,WA 98501 PO Box 41030,Olympia,WA 98504-1030 August 20,2015 Mike Harris Franklin Co.FD #3 7809 Road 36 N Pasco,WA 99301 Re:Transfer of Fire Tender Dear Chief Harris: Thank you for the letterrequestingpermission to transfer one of your ?re tenders to the City of Pasco Fire Department.The truck under consideration is: 1.1989 M923A2 Cargo Truck,VlN:1001AA275 Inv.#16-1-42080 item it:3-0346-2 Based on agreement from the City of Pasco,the Department of Enterprise Services will approve the transfer of this vehicle. Franklin County Fire District #3 shall assume no further responsibility for this vehicle upon the transfer. The City of Pasco agrees to accept the responsibility for this vehicle and agrees to meet the following requirements: 1.City of Pasco will become the donee agency on record for this property and shall maintain custody of this truck until all the terms &conditions have been met in respect to compliance. 2.City of Pasco will be responsible for completing any and all compliance reviews as well as being the donee on record if something should happen to the truck. 3.The truck will be put into service within 12 months of this transfer.Once in use,the City of Pasco will be required to use the vehicle for an additional 18-months before the title shall pass. Thank you for your participation in the Federal Surplus Personal Property Program.Please to not hesitate to give us a call ifyou feel that we may be of any further assistance. Sincerely, '''''W David Baker Program Manager cc:Bob Gear,Fire Chief,City of Pasco Page 258 of 266 WNW"mmmmr Vehicle Certificate of Ownership Applicationd'l-L'CENS'NG Certificate of Fact for Address Verification Please Type or Prlnt Plalnly F E E S PLATE OR TPO COLOR «1 Top or Front Color COLOR «2 BottomorRearCetor VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION(VIN)NUMEIER FILING MODVR PWR USE MAKE SERIES/BODYTYPE MODELID VALUE CODE YEAR MONORAIL 1988 BMY 6X6 mIIItary CYCLE ENGINE OR MOTOR HOME NUMBER FLEEI'CODE EQUIPMENT»MD REG RES EXP DATE SCALE WEIGHT SEATS RTA EXCISETAX DECLARED GWT MONTH ew-r GWT EXP MILEAGE CODE PREVIOUS TITLE A STATE LICENSE SPECIAL OPTIONS COUNTYOF RESIDENCE PURCHASE PRICE TAX JURISDICTION TAX RATE APPLICATION DAV Leased No Title Issued NRM Bonded NON-ROADWORTHY ._INSPECTION Native Amman Reg OnIy [I USETAX EXEMPT:anateautomobllewaspurchasedand used V Jom'Tenamswuh Higms OISurViVDrshIp by me In another state for a minimum of 90 days while I was a bonafrde resident.before I entered Washington on (Must be used in WA for personal and family transportation only.) GIFT:Donor previously paid Washington State sales/use tax. INHERITANCE:Washington sales/use tax paid by Iestator. Transtered to SPOUSE, Sale to INDIANIN INDIAN COUNTRY.Notarized staIement is attached. -lease attach additional a --Iications. VIN ASSIGNMENT GROSS WEIGHT GWT CREDIT (Mignon ARBITRATION SALES/USE TAX Washington State primary residence street address or Washington State principal place of business street address is required on the vehicle record (WAC 308-56A-030).For exce tions to this rule see form TD-420-004. For more than two Re-istered or Le-al Owners NEW REGISTERED OWNER NAME Last First Middle InIIIal LICENSE SERVICE REPLACEMENT PLATE AQUATIC WEED LOCALOPTION TRAUMA FIRST OWNER'S WASHINGTON DRIVERS LICENSE.ID CARD OR UBI NUMBER SECOND OWNER'S WASHINGTON DRIVERS LICENSE.ID CARD OR UEI NUMBER eaw 1w LL57 Q 6 NE LEGAL OWNER NAME Last First Middle InItial REPLACEMENTTAE Cereal 29392.2:LL.) NAME Last First Middle Initial PENALTY _£‘__L‘try was“) ADDRESS I D ID.one ng ADDRESS CONTINUED TOTAL FEES a TAXVA5-I 0 LA}1“ SUB‘ADQENTFEE FIRST OWNER'S WASHINGTON DRIVERS LICENSE.ID CARD OR UBI NUMBER wrmctunzmnmu SECOND OWNER'S WASHINGTON DRIVERS LICENSE,ID CARD OR UBI NUMBER aav‘1w As‘ra? DEALER'S REPORT OF SALE WA DLF‘N04 I certify that this information is correct. The vehicle is clear of encumberances DATE OF DEUVEHY except as shown.Any required sales tax has been collected. Anyonewho knowinglymakes a false statement maybe guiltyof a felonyunder state lawand uponconvictionshallbe punishedbya fine,imprisonmentor both.I declare under penaltyof perjuryunderthe laws of the State ofWashingtonthat the informationIhave providedon thisformis true and correct. X"Ciel—eelz“,[gt-(71%?17%“;Eng:Lina; DEALER NAME DATE OF SALE DEALERS AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE VEHICLE IS:(X)NEW USED FREVIOUSLV TITLED Registered bwnet Signature Date Signed Place Signed (such as City or County)Position,ii signing for a business X Registered Ow ignature Date Signed PIace Signed (such as City or County)Position.it signing tor a business I NOTARIZATION /CERTIFICATION State of Washington Signed or attested County of ['25[I I EM before me on by KQALEIF’I'ép?r“Signature W | | | I Printed Name of Person Signing Document Notary/Agent Signature I | | 7 t Notary's Name (PRINTED or STAMPED)6/[*7dry Z .H]// -'r Dealer No.0R Title IgdaétbiiS?gd 41 (si—AND:County/Of?ce No.0R 52['1&(Mg Nola lAgent Notary Expiration Date ‘\The Department 0!Licensing has a policy 0!providing equal access to its services.m420—WHWN‘“II you need special accommodation,please call (360)902-3600 or TTY (350)664-BE85, Page 259 of 266 [?iermwmw VEHICLE CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP APPLICATION ligEnSl-na Certificate of Fact for Address Verification F E E SPleaseTypeorPrintPlelnly PLATE OR TPO COLOR II!Top orFront Color COLOR#2 BatornorRearCoIor VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION (VIN)NUMBER MOD YFI PWR USE MAKE SERIES/BODY TYPE MODEL ID VALUE CODE YEAR MONORAIL CYCLE ENGINE OR MOTOR HOME NUMBER FLEET CODE EOUIPMENTP MO REG REG EXP DATE SCALE WEIGHT SEATS PITAEXCISE TAX DECLAREDGWT MONTH GWT GWT EXP MILEAGE CODE PREVIOUS TITLEII STATE LICENSE SPECIALOPTIONS COUNTYOF RESIDENCE PURCHASE PRICE TAx JURISDICTION TAXRATE APPLICATION DAV Leased No Title Issued NRM Bonded NON-ROADWORTHY _,NSFECTION "mm America"neg omy I:USE TAX EXEMPT:anateautomobilewaspurchasedand used _ :I JaimTenams With nghis mSuwwmhip y me In another state for a minimum of so days while I was a banalide.‘._resident,belore I entered Washington on VIN ASSIGNMENT Washington State primary I‘t‘SldCl‘lCL‘.Street (Must be used in WA [or personal and family transporlalion only.) address 01'\Vilshing‘lon State principal place GIFT:Donor previously paid Washington State sales/usetaxt of business Stl‘l‘l‘l address is required on INHEHWANCElwaShIHQIOHsaIGS/USS13*Paidby tesIanr. Translered to SPOUSE. Sale to INDIANIN INDIAN COUNTRY.Notarized statement is attached.GWT CREDIT“‘1‘” GROSS WEIGHT the vehicle record (WA I 308-56A-030).For (-xce Jtions to th rule,see form TD-420-004. For m--r t -two He ist-red -r Le-al Iwnr -Iease attach additional 21--Iications. NEW REGISTERED OWNER ARBITRATION NAME Last First Middle Initial _SALES/USE TAx NAME Last First Middle Initial UCENSE SENCE Washington State primary residence Street Address (IF AN INDIVIDUAL)OH Weshlngton State principal place 0 business Street Address (IF A BUSINESS)REPLACEMENTPLATE ADDRESS CONTINUED LPG g , AOUATIC WEED MAILIN ADDR (IF I ERENTTHANHE r -n-v.o'x -m...- LOCAL OPTION FIRST OWNER'S WASHINGTONDRIVERS LICENS CARD OR UBl NUMBER SECOND OWNER'S WASHINGTON DRIVERS LICENSE.ID CARDOR UBI NUMBER TRAUMA NEW LEGAL OWNER NAME Last First Middle Initial REPLACEMENT“ NAME Last First Middle Initial PENALTY ADDRESS OUT OF STATE ADDRESS CONTINUED OTHER FIRST OWNER’SWASHINGTON DRIVERS LICENSE,lD CARD OR UBINUMBER SECOND OWNER’SWASHINGTONDRIVERS LICENSE,ID CARDCR ual NUMBER TOTAL FEES “AX DATEOF SALE SUBI’ EWINEEEIN mt)~ DEALERNAMEWADLRNO.DEALER‘SREPORT OF SALE I certify that this information is correct. he vehicle is clear of encumberances DATE 0.:DELIVERY except as shown Any required sales tax has been collected. Anyonewho knowinglymakes a false statement maybe guiltyof a felonyunderstate lawand upon convictionShallbe punishedbya line,imprisonmentor both.I declare underpenaltyof perjuryunderthe lawsof the State of Washingtonthat the informationIhaveprovidedon thisformis true and correct. DEALEH’SAUTHORIZEDSIGNATURE VEHICLEIS:(X)NEW USED PREVIOUSLY TITLED X Registered Owner Signature Date Signed Place Signed (such as City or County)Position,if Signing for a business X Registered Owner Signature Date Signed Place Signed (such as City or County)Position.il signing tor a business NOTARVSEAL 0B STAMP NOTARIZATION/CERTIFICATION State of Washington Signed or attested County of before me on Signature Printed Name of Person Signing Document Nolaryl Agent Signature Notary's Name (PRINTED or STAMPED) Dealer No.0R AND:County/Office NOIOR Nota Ex-iratlon Date The Department of Licensing has a policy orproviding equal access to its services TD420<001 VEHICLECERT 0F OWNERSHIP APPL(R11/05)0HIW ll you need special accommodation,please call (560)902-3500 or TTY (350)664-8885.Page 260 of 266 FRANKLINFIR DI TRIC PREVENTFIRES IT’S YOUR JOB!V October 9,2015 We,Franklin County Fire Protection District #3,have gi?ed a 1989 BMY 6X6 chassis VIN #1001AA275 to the City of Pasco Washington for $0.00. Thank you,mm Mike Harris Fire Chief Franklin County Fire District #3 7809 Road 36 N,Pasco,WA 99301 509-547-9306 —fax:509-547-2535 —email:fcfd3@fcfd3.org Page 261 of 266 RESOLUTION NO. e39 A Resolution approving performance standards for Pasco Fire Department emergency responses. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco Fire Department is legally established as a fire department to provide certain emergency medical, fire and rescue services; and, WHEREAS, the Pasco Fire Department has a mission statement and goals and objectives to guide the organization in providing fire and emergency medical services to our community; and, WHEREAS, the Pasco Fire Department has a basic organizational structure which includes the City Council, City Manager, Chief, Officers, Firefighters, Paramedics and EMTs; and, WHEREAS, the Pasco Fire Department is required by state law (SHB 1756, laws of 2005) to establish turnout and response time goals for various emergency responses; and, WHEREAS, the Pasco Fire Department has developed written response coverage objectives required to comply with applicable provisions of SHB 1756;NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Pasco City Council hereby approves the attached Response Standards as the Pasco Fire Department policy for determining resource deployment for emergency medical, fire and rescue services; and, This resolution was adopted at a regularly scheduled public meeting of the City of Pasco City Council for City of Pasco Fire Department on this 5 day of February, 2006. rj- 0441 Joyce lso Vmayor ATTE T: APPROVED AS TO FORM: k - 5;?, -r- Sandy Kenw hy, Deputy City lerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 262 of 266 PASCO FIRE DEPARTMENT RESPONSE STANDARDS I.Mission Statement The Pasco Fire Department's mission is to provide rapid mitigation of fire, rescues, hazardous materials and medical emergencies with compassion, integrity, and respect for the people we serve. To be the premier provider of public safety services, utilizing our people as the critical resource to accomplish our goals. II. Response Standards The following standards represent the minimum desired service level for the respective emergency response services provided by the Fire Department. Affected managers shall deploy appropriated resources so as to best achieve the standards set forth herein. A. TURNOUT: A turn out time of two (2) minutes, which the department should meet 85% of the time. All firefighting safety equipment must be donned before the vehicle can leave the station for a fire response. B. FIRST ENGINE ARRIVAL: A response/travel time (after turnout) of six (6) minutes for the arrival of the first engine company (at least two (2) firefighters) to a fire suppression incident, which the department should meet 85% of the time. C. FIRST FULL ALARM ARRIVAL: A response/travel time (after turnout) of twelve 12) minutes for the arrival of the full complement of a 15C alarm response to a fire suppression incident, which the department should meet 85% of the time. "Full complement" means at least two (2) engine companies (trucks) with associated firefighters and one (1) command officer. D. BLS AMBULANCE ARRIVAL: A response/travel time (after turnout) of six (6) minutes/seconds for the arrival of the first emergency medical unit with at least one 1) EMT on board to an emergency medical incident, which the department should meet 85% of the time. E. ALS AMBULANCE ARRIVAL: A response/travel time (after turnout) of six (6) minutes for the arrival of an advanced life support unit with at least one (1) paramedic on board to an ALS emergency medical incident, which the department should meet 85% of the time. F. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: A response/travel time (after turnout) of six (6) minutes for the arrival of the first unit with at least one (1) appropriately trained Hazardous Materials Technician on board to a hazardous materials incident, which the department should meet 85% of the time. Page 263 of 266 PASCO EIRE DEPARTMENT RESPONSE STANDARDS G. TECHNICAL RESCUE INCIDENT: A response/travel time (after turnout) of six 6) minutes for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately trained and equipped personnel on board to a technical rescue incident, which the department should meet 85% of the time. H. AIRCRAFT RESCUE AND FIREFIGHTING: A total response/travel time of three (3) minutes for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately trained and equipped aircraft rescue and firefighting personnel on board to the site of an aircraft incident, which the department should meet 100% of the time (required standard of FAA). I. WILD LAND FIREFIGHTING: A response/travel time (after turnout) of six (6) minutes for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately trained and equipped wild land firefighting personnel on board to a wild land fire incident, which the department should meet 85% of the time. III. ANNUAL REPORT The Fire Chief shall report the department's performance relative to these standards to the City Manager and City Council annually. February 2006 Page 264 of 266 Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re- investment in community infrastructure. City Council Goals QUALITY OF LIFE 2024-2025 Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services and programs. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system. COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK Implement targeted strategies to reduce crime through strategic investments in infrastructure, staffing, and equipment. COMMUNITY SAFETY Promote and encourage economic vitality. ECONOMIC VITALITY Identify opportunities to enhance City of Pasco identity, cohesion, and image. CITY IDENTITY Page 265 of 266 METAS DEL CONCEJO MUNICIPAL 2024-2025 Promover una alta calidad de vida a través de programas, servicios y inversion apropiada y reinversión en la comunidad infraestructura comunitaria. CALIDAD DE VIDA Promover viabilidad financiera a largo plazo, valor, y niveles de calidad de los servicios y programas. SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA Promover un sistema de transporte multimodal altamente funcional. RED DE TRANSPORTE DE LA COMUNIDAD Implementar estrategias específicas para reducir la delincuencia por medios de inversiones estratégicas en infraestructura, personal y equipo. SEGURIDAD DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica. VITALIDAD ECONOMICA Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la cohesión, y la imagen. IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA Page 266 of 266