The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2026.04.13 Council Workshop Packet AGENDA City Council Workshop Meeting 7:05 PM - Monday, April 13, 2026 Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar Page 1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment) to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this workshop. The Pasco City Council Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco. To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-332-249-0718 and use access code 806 396 045#. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Servicio de intéprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos dias antes para garantizar la disponiblidad. (Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.) 2. CALL TO ORDER 3. ROLL CALL (a) Pledge of Allegiance 4. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS 5. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT – the public may comment on each topic scheduled for discussion, up to 2 minutes per person with a total of 8 minutes per item. If Page 1 of 218 opposing sides wish to speak, then both sides receive an equal amount of time to speak or up to 4 minutes each side. 3 - 20 (a) Frontage Improvement in R-S-20 Zones (Sidewalk, Streetlights etc.) (10 minute staff presentation) 21 - 31 (b) 2026 Pavement Preservation Plan (12 minute staff presentation) 32 - 106 (c) Court Street - Traffic Calming Passive Measures Performance (20 minute staff presentation) 107 - 121 (d) Targeted Urban Area (TUA) Tax Exemption Program (10 minutes) 122 - 194 (e) Ordinance - Special Event Code and Downtown Update (10 minute staff presentation) 195 - 216 (f) Resolution - Professional Services Agreement Amendment No. 1 with RH2 Engineering, Inc. for Design Services for the Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements Project (5 minute staff presentation) 6. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION 8. ADJOURNMENT 9. ADDITIONAL NOTES 217 - 218 (a) Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only) Page 2 of 218 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/13/26 FROM: Haylie Matson, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Frontage Improvement in R-S-20 Zones (Sidewalk, Streetlights etc.) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Map Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Restoring the exemption shifts infrastructure costs from developers to the City, likely reducing and retrofits for increasing public long-term expenditures competitiveness for grant funding. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background R-S-12 and R-S-20 are the City of Pasco’s lowest-density residential zoning districts, with minimum lot sizes of 12,000 and 20,000 square feet, respectively. Combined, they account for approximately 35% of all residentially zoned land in the City. The City is proposing to replace the R-S-20 zone with a new R-S-15 Low Density Residential District, establishing a minimum lot size of 14,520 square feet. This item is scheduled for action on April 20, 2026, this staff report refers to the current zoning designation, R-S-20. In 2018, the Pasco City Council adopted Ordinance 4389, establishing Chapter 12.15 PMC, the City's Complete Streets Policy, committing to design streets that safely serve all users of all ages and abilities. The following year, in September 2019, the Council passed Ordinance No. 4454A, which removed Section 12.04.080 of the Pasco Municipal Code. That section had previously Page 3 of 218 designated sidewalk, curb, gutter, and street light installations as optional (developer's choice) in the RS-20 and RS-12 zoning districts. Consistent amendments were simultaneously made to PMC 12.36.050 (Concurrency Development Standards) and PMC 21.15.030 (Street Improvements) to remove companion exemption language. As a result of Ordinance 4454A, new construction in R-S-12 and R-S-20 zones became subject to the same frontage improvement requirements as all other zoning districts in the City, consistent with the goal of building a connected, multi-modal transportation network. Council pre-2019 the restore to is considering now exemption, whether allowing developers in R-S-12 and R-S-20 zones to opt out of constructing sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and street lights as a condition of receiving a building permit. This report outlines both the genuine benefits of such an exemption and the infrastructure, safety, and policy concerns that have been identified. Impact (other than fiscal) Granting a frontage improvement exemption in R-S-12 and R-S-20 zones would have the following real and potential impacts: 1. Benefit - Lower development costs for builders in R-S-12/R-S-20 zones. Exemption from frontage improvement reduces development costs in those zones, likely increasing development activity. 2. Benefit - Preserve the semi-rural character of large-lot residential neighborhoods in Riverview area. Most of Riverview area was developed under County standards when it was an unincorporated area. 3. Challenge - Urban Growth Area (UGA) Standards: The City's negotiating position with Franklin County is that UGA areas must be built to city street standards as a condition of annexation, is undermined if Pasco itself exempts its own zones from those same standards. a. If UGA areas are eventually annexed with substandard infrastructure, the City assumes responsibility for potential retrofitting that could have been avoided by requiring improvements at the time of initial development. 4. Challenge - State Middle Housing Mandate (HB 1110) mandates that cities permit up to six middle housing units on all lots zoned for predominantly residential use. Some middle housing as defined by State are Duplexes, Triplexes, Fourplexes, Townhouses, Cottage housing, Courtyard apartments. a. Higher density development in these zones will generate more residents, more pedestrian trips, and potentially greater utility demands without any corresponding increase in infrastructure if the exemption is restored. 5. Challenge - Complete Streets Policy: Restoring the R-S-20 and R-S-12 zone exemption directly conflicts with Chapter 12.15 PMC (Complete Streets Policy), adopted by Council one year before Ordinance 4454A. PMC 12.15.040 permits exceptions only where there is a documented Page 4 of 218 absence of current or future need, where implementation is physically infeasible, or where cost is excessively disproportionate to benefit. 6. Challenge - Right-of-Way & Future Density Needs: Requiring ROW dedication at the time of permit issuance is the City's lowest-cost opportunity to secure the land needed for future infrastructure. Once construction is complete, acquiring additional ROW requires costly RCW Under purchase. proceedings or condemnation negotiated 36.70A, the City must demonstrate that infrastructure is adequate to serve planned growth. Failure to secure adequate ROW at the time of development may impair the City's ability to demonstrate concurrency for future development approvals in the same area; especially in context of middle housing development discussed above. 7. Lighting: new Exempting Street & Pedestrian - Challenge Safety construction in R-S-12 and R-S-20 zones from sidewalk requirements makes difficult and more and sidewalks between gaps permanent expensive to close. Larger gaps in sidewalks get deprioritized for grant programs. risk Absent street lighting, pedestrian fatality increases substantially at night. Unlit streets also raise broader safety and crime concerns lights after street neighborhoods. developing in Installing construction is complete is significantly more expensive due to ROW access, utility coordination, and trenching costs. 8. and Residents: Builders Among Fairness and Equity – Challenge Granting an exemption in R-S-12 and R-S-20 zones would create an uneven development standard across the city. While builders in other residential frontage construct to improvements, are zones required same excused those from be developers zones these in would obligations. This could be viewed as preferential treatment and may raise concerns about fairness, market consistency, and predictability in the City’s development regulations. It also creates the risk that current and future residents in these areas will receive a lower level of service or fewer public amenities than residents in other neighborhoods. In the future, infrastructure the City may also face pressure to address deficiencies that were not required at the time of development, shifting those costs to the public. V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council not restore the blanket R-S-12 and R- S-20 frontage improvement exemption as proposed. The infrastructure, safety, grant eligibility, and policy concerns associated with a zone-wide opt-out outweigh the development cost benefits for which the exemption is sought. Constraints (time or other considerations) None Page 5 of 218 Alternatives To preserve the City's long-term infrastructure interests, Council could direct staff to return with a middle-ground ordinance that incorporates one or more of the following approaches: 1. Combined Approach: Fee-in-Lieu + ROW Dedication. Require right-of- way dedication as a non-waivable condition of permit approval while allowing dedicated into fee per-linear-foot a pay to developers a sidewalk and street improvement fund in lieu of constructing coordinated disconnected improvements. This approach supports capital projects and avoids fragmented infrastructure; however, Council must carefully set the fee to reflect true public construction costs, which are typically higher than private construction due to state requirements. The model only results in reduced cost to developers if fees are used as match funding for grants yet needs originated from relaxed development standards may be less competitive overall. 2. ROW Dedication Only. Require right-of-way dedication to accommodate future utility and street needs as a non-waivable condition of permit approval while deferring physical improvement construction, preserving future infrastructure capacity without imposing immediate construction costs. There are concerns with this approach as City is requiring dedication for resource that might not be used in foreseeable future. Administrative effort to track deferrals and burdening of future residents at a given time when the improvements become due. 3. Restore Full Exemption (Pre-2019 Opt-Out). Direct staff to prepare an ordinance reinstating the R-S-12 and R-S-20 frontage improvement exemption as it existed prior to Ordinance 4454A. Staff recommends including a concurrent ROW dedication requirement and updates to Complete Streets exception findings. Page 6 of 218 3/23/26, 9:09 PM x_____x8qC5Z2TvNivhEaElcPE9kg..x_____x_ags_2521a92a-2737-11f1-8fd2-0affe50e97d5.png (1650×1275) https://utility.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/rest/directories/arcgisoutput/Utilities/PrintingTools_GPServer/x_____x8qC5Z2TvNivhEaElcPE9kg..x_____x_ags_2521a92a-2737-11f1-8fd2-0affe50e97d5.png 1/1 Pa g e 7 o f 2 1 8 R-S-12 & R-S-20 Frontage Improvement Requirements Policy Considerations for Council April 13, 2026 Pa g e 8 o f 2 1 8 PURPOSE & BACKGROUND Staff presents both benefits and concerns to help Council make an informed policy decision. Ordinance 4454A (2019) Removed Section 12.04.080, which previously exempted R-S-12 and R-S-20 zones from sidewalk, curb, gutter, and street light requirements. Now proposed: Council is considering allowing developers in R-S-12/R-S-20 to once again opt out of frontage improvements at time of development. BACKGROUND WHAT THIS PRESENTATION COVERS • Urban Growth Area (UGA) standards • State middle housing mandates (HB 1110) • Complete Streets Policy (PMC 12.15) • Right-of-way & future density needs • Sidewalk gap & grant funding • Street lighting safety • Development Cost • Neighborhood Character BACKGROUND Pa g e 9 o f 2 1 8 R-S-12 & R-S-20 ZONING –BY THE NUMBERS 35% of all residentially zoned land in Pasco R-S-12 Min. 12,000 sq ft lot size (low density) R-S-20 Min. 20,000 sq ft lot size (very low density) Key Consideration Policy decisions here have significant long-term impacts on infrastructure, safety, and the City's ability to manage growth. R-S-12 and R-S-20 areas are increasingly receiving density pressure from state mandates and population growth. Pa g e 1 0 o f 2 1 8 R-S-20 & R-S-12 MAP Pa g e 1 1 o f 2 1 8 CASE FOR THE EXEMPTION Council's proposed exemption offers two genuine benefits worth weighing: Curb, gutter, sidewalk & street light installation adds significant per-lot costs to new construction. In areas with very low traffic volumes, these costs may not be proportionate to immediate need. Lower up-front costs can incentivize single- family construction and support housing affordability. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER R-S-12 and R-S-20 are the City's lowest-density residential zones, with rural or semi-rural character. Residents in these areas may prefer to preserve the open, informal streetscape consistent with large-lot living. Requiring urban-style frontage improvements may feel inconsistent with the existing character of these neighborhoods. LOWER DEVELOPMENT COSTS Pa g e 1 2 o f 2 1 8 URBAN GROWTH AREA (UGA) STANDARDS City is actively working with County to develop UGA areas up to city infrastructure standards. NEGOTIATING LEVERAGE AT RISK The City's argument that UGA areas must build to city street standards is undermined if Pasco itself exempts its own zones from those same standards. It is difficult to require what the City does not apply internally. CONSISTENCY WITH COMP PLAN The Comprehensive Plan calls for an interconnected network of streets, trails, and access ways and encourages multi-modal transportation. Exemptions in RS zones create permanent barriers to achieving these stated goals. FUTURE ANNEXATION COSTS When UGA areas are eventually annexed with substandard streets, the City inherits the liability for retrofitting infrastructure, at significantly greater expense than requiring improvements at time of initial development. Pa g e 1 3 o f 2 1 8 STATE MIDDLE HOUSING MANDATE (HB 1110) For cities like Pasco, HB 1110 requires allowing at least duplexes on ALL residential lots and up to fourplexes within ¼ mile of major transit stops. DENSITY WITHOUT INFRASTRUCTURE Duplexes, triplexes, and flag lots can be built per law in R-S-12/R-S-20. Without frontage requirements, increased density occurs with no corresponding pedestrian or traffic safety infrastructure. PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INCREASES Middle housing generates more residents per lot. More pedestrians walking to schools, parks, and bus stops, but without sidewalks, those residents walk in the street. UTILITY & ROW CONSTRAINTS Higher density may trigger need for sewer lift stations or utility upgrades. If no additional ROW is secured at time of development, future infrastructure projects become prohibitively expensive. LOSS OF CITY CONTROL HB 1110 limits design review to objective criteria. The City cannot impose additional design conditions. Infrastructure requirements at permit time are one of few remaining leverage points. Pa g e 1 4 o f 2 1 8 COMPLETE STREETS POLICY In 2018, the Pasco City Council adopted Ordinance 4389 (Chapter 12.15 PMC) establishing a Complete Streets Policy, committing to design streets that safely serve all users: pedestrians, cyclists, transit riders, and motorists of all ages and abilities. POLICY CONFLICT Exempting R-S-12/R-S-20 from sidewalks and street lights directly conflicts with the Complete Streets Policy EXCEPTION STANDARDS PMC 12.15.040 allows exemptions only when there is a documented absence of need, when implementation is physically infeasible, or when cost is excessively disproportionate to benefit — not as a blanket zone-wide opt-out for developers. •Creates a con •Within City of Pasco Transportation System Master Plan, June 2022 •Creates a connected, multimodal network •Improves safety and accessibility •Combines projects into one coordinated system •Implemented over time with shared funding BIKE & PED MASTER PLAN Pa g e 1 5 o f 2 1 8 RIGHT-OF-WAY & FUTURE DENSITY NEEDS A key question for Council: Should the City require additional ROW dedication at time of development to protect future options? ROW ONCE —RETROFIT NEVER Requiring ROW dedication at time of permit is the City's only low-cost opportunity. Once a home is built, acquiring additional ROW requires costly condemnation or negotiation. MIDDLE HOUSING DENSITY HB 1110 allows 4-6 units per lot on existing RS lots. Current ROW widths may be insufficient to accommodate the curb, sidewalk, and utility corridor that higher density will eventually require. SEWER LIFT STATIONS Future growth in R-S-12/R-S-20 areas may require sewer lift stations or utility easements. Without additional ROW secured upfront, the City will lack space for these facilities without expensive land acquisition. GMA INFRASTRUCTURE OBLIGATION Under RCW 36.70A, the City must ensure infrastructure is adequate to serve planned growth. Failure to secure ROW now may mean the City cannot demonstrate concurrency for future development approvals. Pa g e 1 6 o f 2 1 8 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY & STREET LIGHTING Problem: Pasco already has significant sidewalk gaps citywide. Exempting new construction in RS zones makes those gaps permanent and harder to close. Grant Eligibility: MRSC confirms that CDBG, Safe Routes to School, and Transportation Alternatives grants all favor projects that create continuous networks. Isolated segments are deprioritized. STREET LIGHTING Safety Impact: NHTSA data shows pedestrian fatalities are disproportionately higher at night on unlit roads. Neighborhood Crime: Unlit streets create safety concerns for residents, particularly in newly developed areas. Retrofit Cost: Installing street lights after construction is complete is far more expensive than requiring them as a condition of the original development permit. SIDEWALK GAPS Pa g e 1 7 o f 2 1 8 SUMMARY • Lower development costs for R-S-12/R-S-20 builders • Preserves semi-rural neighborhood character • Reduces per-permit burden on individual property owners • May incentivize housing construction in large-lot zones (including middle housing) CONCERNS •Breaks continuous sidewalk networks • Undermines UGA City standard arguments • Conflicts with Complete Streets Policy • If HB 1110 increases density, infrastructure won't keep up • Loss of ROW opportunity for future utility needs • Pedestrian and traffic safety risks from dark, sidewalk-free streets ✓BENEFITS Pa g e 1 8 o f 2 1 8 DECISION POINTS 1.Maintain current requirement to construct frontage improvements? 2.Exempt R-S-20, R-S-12, and newly created R-S-15? 3.Exempt all of Riverview area or specific sub-area with the Riverview area? 4.Require City standard ROW dedication in case of future growth? 5.Require Fee-in-Lieu Program? Pa g e 1 9 o f 2 1 8 Discussion & Questions Pa g e 2 0 o f 2 1 8 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/13/26 FROM: Maria Serra, Public Works Director Public Works SUBJECT: 2026 Pavement Preservation Plan I. ATTACHMENT(S): Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presentation Only III. FISCAL IMPACT: Pavement Preservation is paid for from the Overlay Fund. Each year, City staff plans and implements a project to care for pavement throughout Pasco which triggers a transfer from the Overlay Fund to Streets Funds, covering work completed. For the last several years, the value of work completed has been approximately $850,000 to $1,000,000, split between crack sealing, chip sealing, and paving. The split varies based on needs. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is a way to measure the overall health of the roadways. It’s a number from 0 to 100, where 100 represents a brand-new, perfect road and lower scores indicate increasing levels of wear and damage. Issues such as cracks, potholes, or rough surfaces will lower a road’s PCI. According to the City’s 2024 Pavement Management Report, Pasco’s overall average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is 77, with arterials and collectors averaging 70 and residential streets averaging 80. While these numbers reflect generally fair conditions of our pavement, the average is somewhat influenced by the large amount of newer infrastructure Page 21 of 218 constructed during recent growth. As these newer roadways age, large areas of pavement will require treatment at the same time. There are several methods of pavement preservation, and City crews are currently able to perform crack sealing and chip sealing. Crack sealing is a maintenance process where specialized sealant is applied to fill and close cracks in asphalt, preventing water infiltration and extending the surface's lifespan. In chip sealing, a layer of hot liquid asphalt is sprayed onto the pavement and then covered with gravel to protect the pavement surface. It also improves traction. Historically, the City's efforts around pavement preservation have been somewhat varied and dependent upon budget. Looking at the last five years, crews have completed crack seal as well as overlay or chip seal. Most recently, the 2025 project included over 60% crack seal and around 40% chip seal by value. More often, crack seal makes up about a quarter of the work. Impact (other than fiscal) Pavement preservation extends the life of our roads, decreasing potholes and other defects which can affect daily life for members of our community. V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation It is recommended that staff continue working on pavement preservation in an annual, data-based approach. This year's project is estimated to include chip seal on 3.56 miles of roadway at varying widths, using over 1000 tons of rock and 29,000 gallons of chip oil. Crack seal work will apply nearly 90,000 pounds of crack seal material. Constraints Pavement work is temperature sensitive. When surfaces are too cold, the asphalt or oil does not adhere properly and can result in loose rock chips and failure of the chip seal. For this reason, pavement work is performed mostly in the spring and fall - crack seal before chip seal. Next Steps City crews will proceed with pavement maintenance activities, as determined by analysis of the pavement condition index (PCI) of each road, within fiscal constraints. Alternatives Through the budget process, council may expand or decrease the pavement preservation program within our City. Page 22 of 218 Pasco City Council April 13, 2026 Workshop Pa g e 2 3 o f 2 1 8 2026 Pavement Preservation April 13, 2026 Pasco City Council Pa g e 2 4 o f 2 1 8 Pavement Preservation Matters Pavement preservation -Extends pavement lifespan -Reduces potholes and surface defects -Improves: -Safety -Ride quality -Daily travel experience -Helps avoid more costly repairs later 3 Pa g e 2 5 o f 2 1 8 -Measures roadway condition on a scale of 0–100 -100 = new pavement; lower scores = more deterioration -Factors include: -Cracking -Potholes -Surface roughness Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Pa g e 2 6 o f 2 1 8 Citywide PCI (2024) -Overall average PCI: 77 -Arterials & collectors: 70 -Residential streets: 80 -Indicates generally fair condition -Average boosted by newer infrastructure -Many roads built during recent growth -As these roads age: -Large areas will need treatment at the same time -Emphasizes need for proactive maintenance Current Pavement Conditions Pa g e 2 7 o f 2 1 8 Crack Seal -Fills and seals pavement cracks -Prevents water infiltration -Slows pavement deterioration Chip Seal -Applies liquid asphalt + aggregate (gravel) -Protects pavement surface -Improves traction -Extends life of aging roads Preservation Methods 6 Pa g e 2 8 o f 2 1 8 -Court Street (4th to 20th, Road 100 to Road 114) -First Avenue -Harris Road -Railroad Avenue -Wernett Road (Road 30 to Road 40, Road 56 to Road 68) -Sylvester Street 2026 Plan for Crack Seal Pa g e 2 9 o f 2 1 8 -Frontier Loop -Harris Road -Railroad Avenue -Wernett Road (Road 30 to Road 40, Road 56 to Road 68) -First Avenue 2026 Plan for Chip Seal 8 Pa g e 3 0 o f 2 1 8 Questions?Pa g e 3 1 o f 2 1 8 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 2, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/13/26 FROM: Maria Serra, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Court Street - Traffic Calming Passive Measures Performance I. ATTACHMENT(S): Presentation Report "Court Street Traffic Calming Follow-Up" by Traffic Engineer J Manix, PE, Apex Companies, LLC II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presentation Only III. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost of implementation is $70,000 for speed cushions, including associated pavement markings and signage. An additional $12,000 would be required for bike lane protection signage, if driver encroachment into the bike lane is observed following installation. The traffic calming program is not funded in the current biennium budget. Should Council direct staff to proceed, funding would need to be reallocated from existing street maintenance activities within the Streets Fund (Fund 110). The Fund is currently tracking 6% below its proportional expenditure rate for the biennium, a modest variance that is typical given the seasonal nature of street work. Staff has identified the following reallocation options to fund implementation: 1. Eliminate the sidewalk maintenance program for 2026 and reduce pavement marking maintenance by 15%. 2. Reduce signal supply maintenance by 45% and sign maintenance by 23%. 3. Reduce pavement preservation activities for 2026 by 9%. Each option carries tradeoffs and would defer or reduce maintenance work elsewhere in the street system. Page 32 of 218 Three other alternatives with no impact to the street fund in this biennium: 4. Utilize General Fund (fund 100) reserves 5. Schedule improvements in the FY 2027 under a new budget allocation. A draw back to this approach is that it would delay implementation. 6. Council may also consider establishing a special assessment district, which would have costs borne by benefitting residents, though this approach would delay implementation. It is for that reason that it is not recommended. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background Council has discussed traffic calming on Court Street (Road 96 to Harris Road) several times throughout 2024 and into 2025. In July 2024, consultant CivTech presented study findings and calming concepts. Council subsequently directed staff to obtain a second opinion, which was delivered by John Manix, PE, of PBS Engineering (now APEX, LLC) at the January 21, 2025 meeting. That analysis evaluated traffic, bicycle and pedestrian counts, crash data, Pasco Police Department data, and applicable local, state, and national standards. Prior meeting references are available below: 1. (1:57:00) Misc. 2024– 13, May discussion Council Pasco City Workshop, May 13, 2024 2. July 22, 2024 – Item 5C (59:00) Pasco City Council Special Meeting & Workshop, July 22, 2024 3. September 23, 2024– Item 5b (1:00:56) Pasco City Council Workshop, September 23, 2024 4. October 15, 2024 – Item 5C (26:10) Pasco City Council Workshop, October 15, 2024 - YouTube 5. October 21, 2024 – Misc. discussion (2:54:47) Pasco City Council Regular Meeting, October 21, 2024 6. January 21, 2025 – Items 10D and 10E - Second Opinion Court street Speed Analysis and Speed Reduction on Court street (1:18:55) Pasco City Television On Demand PBS Engineering recommended a phased approach: first implementing lower- cost passive measures ,including speed limit reductions, radar feedback signs, and upgraded buffered bike lanes; followed by evaluation of active measures such as speed cushions, traffic circles, or raised crosswalks if warranted. Council adopted Ordinance No. 4759 on January 21, 2025, reducing speed limits on Court Street. Page 33 of 218 Passive Traffic Calming measures implemented  Reduced speed limit on Court Street from Harris Road to Road 100 from 30 mph to 25 mph and from Road 96 to Road 100 from 40 mph to 30 mph (Both consultants agreed on this latter reduction).  Installed radar speed feedback signs at the vicinity of the two trail crossings.  Narrowed the travel lanes on Court Street and upgrade existing bike lanes to buffered bike lanes Updated signage and radar feedback signs were installed in early and mid- 2025, respectively. In January of 2026, all measures had in place for a minimum of six months. Impacts (other than fiscal) Installation of speed cushions on Court Street is expected to reduce vehicle operating speeds and improve driver awareness along the corridor. Speed cushions create a vertical deflection that encourages motorists to slow down, while their split design allows fire apparatus to straddle the devices with minimal impact to response times. Standard passenger vehicles must travel over the cushions at a reduced speed, which is the intended effect. There are two known drawbacks Council should be aware of: the cushions will generate additional noise for nearby residents, and some drivers may cut through adjacent residential streets to avoid the pillows installed in the arterial roadway. Staff will monitor for cut-through traffic and respond if it becomes a problem. It should also be noted that speed cushions are most appropriate for lower- volume this levels, arterial true to Street traffic Court as streets; grows treatment should be revisited as part of a broader corridor redesign. V. DISCUSSION: A 6-month review traffic evaluation was performed by John Manix, PE, with PBS Engineering. A memorandum enclosed to this report provides a summary of the information collected and evaluated, as well as recommendations for future implementation. In spring and summer of 2025, the City implemented a series of passive traffic calming measures along Court Street between Harris Road and Road 100 on a six-month trial basis. These measures included radar feedback signs, new bike lane buffer striping, and a reduction in the posted speed limit. Apex was retained to conduct a follow-up evaluation comparing before and after speed data to assess the effectiveness of these treatments. The evaluation findings are that the passive traffic calming measures did not Page 34 of 218 produce a sustained reduction in vehicle speeds along the corridor. While a brief initial decrease in speeding was observed following installation, vehicle speeds gradually returned to pre-implementation levels within the trial period. This conclusion is supported by both independent speed count data collected at Court Street/Road 109 and Court Street/Road 101, as well as supplemental data provided by the Pasco Police Department derived from vehicle cell phone telemetry spanning September 2025 through March 2026. Median travel speeds remained at or near 28 mph, which is unchanged from baseline conditions and 85th-percentile speeds showed no meaningful improvement (remained at 34mph). Based on these findings, Apex recommends the installation of asphalt speed cushions as the preferred active traffic calming measure. Unlike passive treatments, reliable consistent, produce to are cushions speed expected reductions in vehicle speeds while still permitting emergency vehicle passage with minimal delay. These devices may generate additional noise as vehicles navigate them. Apex recommends a variable spacing strategy: approximately 400-foot and spacing near existing Sacajawea Regional Trail crossings increasing to approximately 800-foot spacing between crosswalks. Type 1 speed cushions per City of Vancouver Standard Plan T02-23 are specified as the appropriate design standard. Based on concerns related to the City’s past experience with vehicles leaving the roadway to avoid speed cushions on Road 96, installation of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) warning sign “SPEED HUMP” (W17- 1) at the edge of the roadway adjacent to the speed cushion may be considered. This treatment has previously proven effective in keeping vehicles on the roadway. No additional Speed Feedback signs are recommended to be placed along the corridor at this time. Recommendation As per the traffic engineering report, implementation of additional measures is encouraged. Measures would consist of: a. 10 sets of Speed cushions and bump ahead signage and associated pavement markings. b. 20 "speed hump" street signs, if veering of vehicles into bike lanes is observed. Cost is estimated to be approximately $70,000 for measure a, and an additional $12,000 for measure b, including materials, labor and equipment. The work is proposed to be performed by City maintenance crews. Page 35 of 218 Constraints Implementation will be executed, with council direction, as soon as materials are received. Next Steps Staff will order materials and schedule work to implement the recommended measures expeditiously. Notice of improvements will be provided to residents via a letter mailed to residents along the corridor. No additional outreach events or feedback sessions are proposed at this time. Alternatives 1) Council may direct staff to delay scheduling of improvements or deprioritize this work Page 36 of 218 April 13, 2026 Pasco City Council Workshop Pa g e 3 7 o f 2 1 8 Traffic Calming Court Street 6-month Evaluation April 13, 2026 Pasco City Council Pa g e 3 8 o f 2 1 8 Traffic Calming on Court Street 3 COUNCIL MEETINGS VIDEO LINKS: The meeting date, video link and time of the discussion is provided below for your reference: 1.May 13, 2024– Misc. discussion (1:57:00) Pasco City Council Workshop, May 13, 2024 2.July 22, 2024 – Item 5C (59:00) Pasco City Council Special Meeting & Workshop, July 22, 2024 3.September 23, 2024– Item 5b (1:00:56) Pasco City Council Workshop, September 23, 2024 4.October 15, 2024 – Item 5C (26:10) Pasco City Council Workshop, October 15, 2024 - YouTube 5.October 21, 2024 – Misc. discussion (2:54:47) Pasco City Council Regular Meeting, October 21, 2024 6.January 21, 2025 – Items 10D and 10E - Second Opinion Court street Speed Analysis and Speed Reduction on Court street (1:18:55) Pasco City Television On Demand Pa g e 3 9 o f 2 1 8 Timeline of Court Street Traffic Calming Neighborhood meetings, original speed study and second opinion study Implementation of passive measures, as recommended, and 6-month performance evaluation period Performance results and proposed active measure implementation 2024 2025 2026 Pa g e 4 0 o f 2 1 8 Second opinion by PBS-APEX – Findings (Dec 2024) 5 Pa g e 4 1 o f 2 1 8 Second opinion by PBS-APEX – Recommendations (Dec 2024) 6 Pa g e 4 2 o f 2 1 8 Second opinion by PBS-APEX – Recommendations (Dec 2024) 7 Pa g e 4 3 o f 2 1 8 Second opinion by PBS-APEX –Implementation (2025) 8 •Striping lanes with double yellow center lane and buffered bike lanes •Reduced speed limit: o From 35MPH to 25MPH between Harris Rd and road 100, and o From 40 MPH to 30MPH from Rd100 to Rd 96. •Installation of two speed feedback radar signs near trail crossings Pa g e 4 4 o f 2 1 8 Second opinion by PBS-APEX –Enforcement (2025) 9 Mid September 2025 – mid October 2025: 5 Traffic Complaints (Dispatch) 22 Extra Patrols (Proactive) 12 Traffic Stops (2 Citations issued and 10 warnings issued) Since January 2025 – October 2025 15 Traffic Complaints (Dispatch) 29 Extra Patrols (Proactive) 45 Traffic Stops (7 Citations issued and 38 warnings issued) Pa g e 4 5 o f 2 1 8 Traffic Calming Court Street – Performance Evaluation 10 Pa g e 4 6 o f 2 1 8 Traffic Calming Court Street – Recommendations (2026) 11 a. Install speed cushions every 800 ft -10 sets of cushions, and “Bump ahead” signs and pavement markings Estimated Implementation cost: $70,000 Install as soon as materials are available: Estimated June 2026 b. Install “hump” signs adjacent to cushions to deter veering if behavior is observed Additional cost $12,000 Pa g e 4 7 o f 2 1 8 Traffic Calming Court Street – Recommendation (2026) 12Source: City of Vancouver, Washington Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program -The City of Vancouver, WA Pa g e 4 8 o f 2 1 8 Traffic Calming Court Street – Recommendation (2026) 13 Pa g e 4 9 o f 2 1 8 Traffic Calming Court Street – Implementation (2026) 14 Seeking Council Direction on: 1)Whether to proceed with implementation as recommended, 2)Elect budget reallocation, 3)Confirm planned limited outreach is sufficient. Pa g e 5 0 o f 2 1 8 Pa g e 5 1 o f 2 1 8 1325 SE TECH CENTER DR, STE 140, VANCOUVER, WA 98683  360.695.3488 MAIN  866.727.0140 FAX  PBSUSA.COM Memorandum DATE: March 13, 2026 TO: Maria Serra, PE, City of Pasco Public Works Director CC: Mary Heather Ames, PE, and Andrey Avetisyan, PE (City of Pasco) FROM: John A. Manix PE, Apex Companies, LLC PROJECT: 26004248 REGARDING: Court Street Traffic Calming Follow-Up INTRODUCTION Apex Companies, LLC (Apex) is pleased to submit a follow-up evaluation to the Court Street Speed Study Review Memorandum previously submitted in December 2024. The recommended passive traffic calming plan was implemented in June 2025. Following the completion of that memorandum, the City of Pasco (City) implemented a series of passive traffic calming measures along Court Street between Harris Road and Road 100 on a six-month trial basis to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing vehicle speeds and improving overall corridor safety, comparing before and after speed data along the corridor. This memorandum summarizes the findings from the six-month evaluation period, including a review of updated speed data collected following implementation of the traffic calming measures. Based on these findings, Apex provides updated findings and recommendations for traffic calming strategies along the corridor and outlines potential next steps for the City to consider. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the request of City staff, a six-month follow-up evaluation was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the passive traffic calming measures implemented along Court Street between Harris Road and Road 100. These measures were installed on a trial basis to determine whether low-cost treatments could effectively reduce vehicle speeds within the corridor. Updated speed data collected during the trial period indicates that while the passive measures initially produced a short-term reduction in vehicle speeds, the effect was not sustained over time. Vehicle speeds gradually returned to levels similar to those observed prior to the implementation of the trial measures. Based on the updated findings and coordination with City staff, additional traffic calming strategies were evaluated to identify a more reliable method of reducing vehicle speeds along the corridor. Asphalt speed cushions are recommended as the preferred traffic calming measure. If approved by the City Council, the next step will be to identify appropriate locations for speed cushion installation and proceed with design and implementation. Apex has prepared a conceptual design with location of the speed cushion installation. Page 52 of 218 City of Pasco Court Street Traffic Calming Follow-Up March 13, 2026 Page 2 26004248 As traffic volumes increase in the future, additional roadway improvements such as sidewalks, curb, and gutter infrastructure may also be recommended to further enhance safety and support multimodal travel along Court Street. Findings The passive traffic calming is in line with the City’s Complete Street ordinance. The lower posted speed limit and additional striping that creates the buffer reduces the Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (BLTS) and Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress (PLTS) on Court Street. Average traffic volumes were similar between the before and after conditions during the trial period. Future traffic growth will increase the need for upgrades to Court Street. The proposed speed cushions will help reduce impacts associated with near-term traffic growth. No significant changes in vehicle speeds were observed after the passive traffic calming measures were implemented. Passive traffic calming measures along Court Street produced an initial reduction in vehicle speeds but were not effective for the entire duration of the trial period. Recommendations Install speed cushions at closer spacing (approximately 400 feet) near existing crosswalks and increase spacing to approximately 800 feet between crosswalks. Install Type 1 speed cushions per City of Vancouver Standard Plan T02-23. BACKGROUND Apex was contracted by the City to provide a second opinion on CivTech’s speed survey and posted speed recommendations report and to conduct a six-month follow-up evaluation after the implementation of passive traffic calming measures. As part of this effort, passive traffic calming strategies were installed along Court Street, including radar feedback signs, new bike lane buffer striping, and a reduction in the posted speed limit. The purpose of these measures was to determine whether passive traffic calming treatments alone could effectively reduce vehicle speeds along the corridor. Passive traffic calming relies primarily on signing and pavement markings to implement low-cost, near- term improvements. Preliminary findings were reviewed with City staff, and potential next-step traffic calming strategies were discussed. This segment of Court Street lacks continuous sidewalks and is frequently used by bicyclists due to its connection to the Sacajawea Heritage Trail system. These conditions increase the importance of managing vehicle speeds to improve safety for all roadway users. Image 1 below depicts an eastbound view of Court Street with the added 4-inch white bike lane buffer striping. A bicyclist can be seen riding westbound on Court Street. Page 53 of 218 City of Pasco Court Street Traffic Calming Follow-Up March 13, 2026 Page 3 26004248 Image 1. Eastbound Court Street Complete Streets The City’s Complete Streets Policy, in Chapter 12.15.010 of the Pasco Municipal Code, is intended to improve overall community safety while also supporting the economic and desirability of the City as a place to live and conduct business. BLTS and PLTS are established methodologies used to evaluate the suitability of these travel modes based on roadway characteristics. BLTS and PLTS provide measures of the relative safety, accessibility, and functionality of pedestrian and bicycle travel along roadway segments for all users of the City’s right-of-way. A “1” rating is the least stressful and “4” is the most stressful rating. The objective of these evaluations is to identify opportunities to reduce the risk of pedestrian and bicycle crashes and support the goals of the Complete Streets Policy. Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities and Level of Traffic Stress From Exhibit 1510-1 of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Design Manual (shown below), the PLTS and BLTS on Court Street from I-182 to Road 100 was reduced from 3 to 2 by lowering the target speed from 30 miles per hour (mph) to 25 mph. Page 54 of 218 City of Pasco Court Street Traffic Calming Follow-Up March 13, 2026 Page 4 26004248 From Exhibit 1520-5 of the WSDOT Design Manual, the PLTS and BLTS on Court Street from Road 100 to Road 96 were reduced from 4 to 3 due to reducing the target speed from 40 mph to 30 mph as part of a passive traffic calming measure. Finding: The passive traffic calming is in line with the City’s Complete Street ordinance. The lower posted speed limit and additional striping that creates the buffer reduces the BLTS and PLTS on Court Street. BEFORE AND AFTER EVALUATION A six-month evaluation period was completed following implementation of passive traffic calming measures along Court Street. Updated speed data was collected at the Court Street / Road 109 and Court Street / Road 101 intersections, corresponding to previously recorded CivTech count locations 88 and 90. This allowed for consistent comparison between datasets. The original 2023 and updated 2026 speed data is attached. Before and After Traffic Volume Table 1 below and Figure 1 presents the before and after street traffic volumes at the two traffic count locations for both eastbound and westbound directions. These values are the total volumes over the course of three days. Page 55 of 218 City of Pasco Court Street Traffic Calming Follow-Up March 13, 2026 Page 5 26004248 Table 1. Before and After Court Street Traffic Volume Information Location Direction Before Volume After Volume Court Street / Road 109 EB 1,189 601 Court Street / Road 109 WB 839 982 Court Street / Road 101 EB 1,393 1,581 Court Street / Road 101 WB 1,601 1,807 Total at both locations 5,022 4,971 EB: eastbound; WB: westbound The before and after counts varied by location and direction, but the totals for both locations and both directions are approximately equal. The variations are likely the result of different methods used to collect traffic volume data. Finding: Average traffic volumes were similar between the before and after conditions during the trial period. Future Traffic Volume Future growth in the surrounding area is expected to increase traffic volumes along Court Street. To evaluate potential future conditions, travel demand model runs from the Benton-Franklin Council of Governments (BFCOG) were obtained for the 2025 base year and the 2045 future year. Figure 2 presents the BFCOG PM peak-hour model volumes for the study corridor and surrounding network. The model results indicate a notable increase in PM peak-hour volumes along Court Street, primarily driven by planned developments and future transportation projects in the area. As traffic volumes increase, the lack of sidewalks may negatively affect livability and safety along Court Street. Future roadway improvements will likely be necessary; however, in the near term, the proposed speed cushions will help reduce the impacts associated with future traffic growth. Finding: Future traffic growth will increase the need for upgrades to Court Street. The proposed speed cushions will help reduce impacts associated with near-term traffic growth. Vehicle Speed Updated speed data was collected at Court Street/Road 109 and Court Street/Road 101, corresponding to previously recorded CivTech count locations 88 and 90. This allowed for consistent comparison between datasets. The updated data indicates that vehicle speeds along Court Street did not experience significant long-term changes following implementation of the passive traffic calming measures. Table 2 below and Figure 3 present the corresponding speed comparisons. Page 56 of 218 City of Pasco Court Street Traffic Calming Follow-Up March 13, 2026 Page 6 26004248 Table 2. Court Street Vehicle Travel Speed Information—Before and After Roadway Characteristics BEFORE AFTER Traffic Count Location Traffic Count Location Court Street / Road 109 (Site 90) Court Street / Road 101 (Site 88) Court Street / Road 109 Court Street / Road 101 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph 30 mph 25 mph 30 mph Vehicle 10-mph Pace EB: 26 to 35 mph WB: 26 to 35 mph EB: 26 to 35 mph WB: 26 to 35 mph EB: 23 to 33 mph WB: 23 to 33 mph EB: 24 to 34 mph WB: 24 to 34 mph Median (50th Percentile) Speed EB: 28 mph WB: 28 mph EB: 28 mph WB: 28 mph EB: 27 mph WB: 27 mph EB: 28 mph WB: 28 mph 85th-Percentile Speed EB: 33 mph WB: 33 mph EB: 33 mph WB: 33 mph EB: 33 mph WB: 34 mph EB: 32 mph WB: 32 mph EB: eastbound; WB: westbound Finding: No significant changes in vehicle speeds were observed after the passive traffic calming measures were implemented. Pasco Police Department Speed Data The Pasco Police Department (PD) provided additional speed data for the Court Street corridor that was derived from vehicle user cell phones. Exhibit 1 shows the percentage of drivers exceeding the speed limit from September 2025 through March 2026. The data indicated a short-term decrease in speeding following installation of the passive traffic calming measures in November 2025. However, speeds gradually started to increase in months following. Overall, the PD data supports the study findings that the passive traffic calming measures did not result in a sustained reduction in vehicle speeds along the corridor. Exhibit 1. Pasco PD Speed Data Finding: Passive traffic calming measures along Court Street produced an initial reduction in vehicle speeds but were not effective for the entire duration of the trial period. Page 57 of 218 City of Pasco Court Street Traffic Calming Follow-Up March 13, 2026 Page 7 26004248 NEXT STEPS—TRAFFIC CALMING Based on the updated speed data and coordination with City staff, speed cushions have been identified as the most appropriate active traffic calming measure for the corridor. Unlike passive measures, speed cushions are expected to provide more consistent reductions in vehicle speeds while still allowing emergency vehicles to pass with minimal delay. Installation should be carefully limited to avoid diverting traffic onto nearby residential streets. Predicting diversion is difficult; however, achieving consistent travel speeds of approximately 20 to 25 mph would likely require spacing of approximately 400 feet. This spacing is not recommended due to the large number of cushions that would be required and the increased potential for traffic diversion onto parallel residential streets. Apex prepared two conceptual layouts with speed cushion spacing of approximately 800 feet and 1,600 feet. The 800-foot spacing is similar to that used on Road 96. Speed measurements collected on Road 96 may provide an approximate indication of the potential effectiveness of this spacing for speed reduction. The spacing of speed cushions should be considered carefully due to Court Street functioning as a collector/arterial with approximately 3,000 vehicles per day. Spacing considerations include:  400-foot spacing: Most effective at maintaining speeds near 25 mph, but most likely to divert traffic to parallel streets.  800-foot spacing: Expected to reduce speeds to approximately 30 mph with a lower risk of diversion.  1,600-foot spacing: Likely to reduce excessive speeding (40 mph or higher) with minimal likelihood of diversion. Recommendation: Install speed cushions at closer spacing (approximately 400 feet) near existing crosswalks and increase spacing to approximately 800 feet between crosswalks. These spacing intervals are recommended as an initial installation, with the option to add additional speed cushions between locations if greater speed reduction is desired. Speed cushions can be installed in several configurations depending on the existing roadway conditions and agency preferences. The City of Vancouver speed cushion standard plans are referenced as potential alternatives. The City of Vancouver has a long history of implementing speed cushions, and their specific dimensions have proven effective over time. See the attached Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3 speed cushion plans. Recommendation: Install Type 1 speed cushion per City of Vancouver Standard Plan T02-23. Based on concerns related to the City’s past experience with vehicles leaving the roadway to avoid speed cushions on Road 96, installation of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) warning sign “SPEED HUMP” (W17-1) at the edge of the roadway adjacent to the speed cushion may be considered. This treatment has previously proven effective in keeping vehicles on the roadway. However, it is only recommended if this issue arises. The Type 1 speed cushions proposed for Court Street are not expected to experience this problem. Page 58 of 218 City of Pasco Court Street Traffic Calming Follow-Up March 13, 2026 Page 8 26004248 Attachments: Figure 1. Before & After Volumes Figure 2. PM Peak Hour Model Data Figure 3. Before & After Speeds Speed Cushion Spacing Figures City of Vancouver Type 1, 2 and 3 Speed Cushion Standard Plans Before Traffic Data After Traffic Data Page 59 of 218 C O U R T S T RD 1 0 9 RD 1 0 1 ARGENT RD I-18 2 C O U R T S T RD 1 0 0 RD 1 0 3 CHAPEL HILL BLVDHARRIS RD 1 Before & After Volumes FIGURE March 2026 Apex Project 26004248 NTS Court Street / Road 109 8391,189 1 Court Street / Road 101 1,6011,393 2 Court Street / Road 109 9826011 Court Street / Road 101 1,8071,581 2 1 2 BEFORE VOLUMES AFTER VOLUMES Traffic Calming City of Pasco Court Street Pasco, Washington LEGEND TUBE COUNT LOCATIONS XXX TRAFFIC COUNTS Court Street Traffic Calming Follow-Up Count date: January 30 through February 1, 2024 Count date: December 5 through December 7, 2023 Count date: January 27 through January 29, 2026 Count date: January 27 through January 29, 2026 Pa g e 6 0 o f 2 1 8 Court Street Traffic Calming Follow-Up 2 PM Peak Hour Model Data FIGURE March 2026 Apex Project 26004248 NTS Traffic Calming City of Pasco Court Street Pasco, Washington COURT ST ROAD 108 ROAD 100 ROAD 96 ARGENT RD Pa g e 6 1 o f 2 1 8 C O U R T S T RD 1 0 9 RD 1 0 1 ARGENT RD I-18 2 C O U R T S T RD 1 0 0 RD 1 0 3 CHAPEL HILL BLVDHARRIS RD 3 Before & After Speeds FIGURE March 2026 Apex Project 26004248 NTS Court Street / Road 109 28 mph28 mph 1 Court Street / Road 101 28 mph28 mph 2 Court Street / Road 109 33 mph33 mph 1 Court Street / Road 101 33 mph33 mph 2 50th Percentile Speeds (Before) 85th Percentile Speed (Before) Traffic Calming City of Pasco Court Street Pasco, Washington LEGEND SPEED SURVEY LOCATIONS XX VEHICLE SPEED Court Street Traffic Calming Follow-Up Court Street / Road 109 27 mph27 mph 1 Court Street / Road 101 28 mph28 mph 2 Court Street / Road 109 34 mph33 mph 1 Court Street / Road 101 32 mph32 mph 2 50th Percentile Speeds (After) 85th Percentile Speed (After) 1 2 Pa g e 6 2 o f 2 1 8 2000 ft N ➤➤ N 3 0 0 f t 4 0 0 f t 4 0 0 f t 8 0 0 f t 8 0 0 f t 8 0 0 f t 4 0 0 f t 9 5 0 f t Court Street Traffic Calming - 800 Foot Spacing Speed Cushion Placement City of Pasco LEGEND: crosswalk proposed speed cushion RD 1 0 0 C O U R T S T I-18 2 RD 1 0 8 8 0 0 f t 8 0 0 f t 8 0 0 f t Pa g e 6 3 o f 2 1 8 2000 ft N ➤➤ N 3 0 0 f t 4 0 0 f t 4 0 0 f t 1 , 6 0 0 f t 1 , 6 0 0 f t 1 , 6 0 0 f t 4 0 0 f t 9 5 0 f t Court Street Traffic Calming - 1,600 Foot Spacing Speed Cushion Placement City of Pasco LEGEND: crosswalk proposed speed cushion RD 1 0 0 C O U R T S T I-18 2 RD 1 0 8 Pa g e 6 4 o f 2 1 8 STD. PLAN NO.CITY OF VANCOUVER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION DIVISION DRAWN BY APPROVED BY APPROVAL DATE REVISION APPROVAL DATEAPPROVED BY T02-23CDC8/04 7 3/24 SPEED CUSHION TYPE 1 Page 65 of 218 STD. PLAN NO.CITY OF VANCOUVER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION DIVISION DRAWN BY APPROVED BY APPROVAL DATE REVISION APPROVAL DATEAPPROVED BY T02-24CDC8/04 7 3/24 SPEED CUSHION TYPE II Page 66 of 218 STD. PLAN NO.CITY OF VANCOUVER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION DIVISION DRAWN BY APPROVED BY APPROVAL DATE REVISION APPROVAL DATEAPPROVED BY T02-25CDC8/04 7 3/24 SPEED CUSHION TYPE III Page 67 of 218 Pasco Speed Study – Pasco, WA 100 Pa g e 6 8 o f 2 1 8 Page 1 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net EB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 12/05/23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 04:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 05:00 0 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 06:00 0 10 4 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 07:00 0 49 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 08:00 1 30 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 09:00 0 22 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 27 10:00 0 13 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 22 11:00 1 18 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 12 PM 0 25 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 34 13:00 0 14 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 14:00 0 20 6 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 29 15:00 0 28 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 16:00 0 25 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 17:00 0 25 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 18:00 0 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 19:00 0 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 20:00 0 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 21:00 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 22:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Day Total 2 345 96 7 13 2 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 470 Percent 0.4%73.4%20.4%1.5%2.8%0.4%0.0%0.2%0.2%0.6%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 08:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 03:00 09:00 06:00 09:00 07:00 Vol.1 49 9 3 2 1 1 1 60 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 13:00 14:00 16:00 14:00 12:00 15:00 Vol. 28 16 1 2 1 1 1 46 Pa g e 6 9 o f 2 1 8 Page 2 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net EB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 12/06/23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 05:00 1 7 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 06:00 0 12 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 07:00 0 50 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 08:00 0 34 9 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 09:00 0 21 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 30 10:00 0 24 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 11:00 0 22 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 12 PM 0 14 11 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 28 13:00 0 19 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 14:00 0 31 12 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 46 15:00 2 19 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 16:00 0 25 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 17:00 0 17 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 18:00 0 19 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 19:00 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 20:00 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Day Total 3 341 108 6 11 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 473 Percent 0.6%72.1%22.8%1.3%2.3%0.2%0.0%0.2%0.2%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 05:00 07:00 11:00 08:00 06:00 10:00 09:00 07:00 Vol.1 50 13 3 2 1 1 61 PM Peak 15:00 14:00 14:00 12:00 14:00 14:00 12:00 14:00 Vol.2 31 12 1 2 1 1 46 Pa g e 7 0 o f 2 1 8 Page 3 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net EB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 12/07/23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 05:00 0 6 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 06:00 0 7 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 07:00 0 56 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 08:00 3 20 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 09:00 0 22 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 29 10:00 1 19 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 11:00 1 22 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 12 PM 0 17 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 13:00 0 13 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 14:00 0 21 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 30 15:00 0 21 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 16:00 0 30 5 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 39 17:00 1 17 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 18:00 0 17 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 19:00 0 7 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 20:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 21:00 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 22:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23:00 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Day Total 6 321 104 5 11 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 450 Percent 1.3%71.3%23.1%1.1%2.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 08:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 06:00 09:00 07:00 Vol.3 56 13 3 2 1 69 PM Peak 17:00 16:00 14:00 13:00 16:00 14:00 16:00 Vol.1 30 8 1 3 1 39 Grand Total 11 1007 308 18 35 3 0 2 5 4 0 0 0 1393 Percent 0.8%72.3%22.1%1.3%2.5%0.2%0.0%0.1%0.4%0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0% Pa g e 7 1 o f 2 1 8 Page 4 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net WB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 12/05/23 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 06:00 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 07:00 0 22 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 08:00 0 19 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 09:00 0 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 10:00 0 17 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 11:00 1 26 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 12 PM 0 23 10 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 13:00 0 23 5 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 33 14:00 0 38 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 49 15:00 1 58 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 16:00 2 41 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 17:00 0 34 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 18:00 0 23 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 19:00 0 12 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 20:00 0 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 21:00 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 22:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Day Total 4 392 110 4 12 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 528 Percent 0.8%74.2%20.8%0.8%2.3%0.8%0.0%0.0%0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 11:00 11:00 07:00 08:00 03:00 10:00 07:00 Vol.1 26 11 2 2 1 34 PM Peak 16:00 15:00 16:00 12:00 13:00 13:00 13:00 15:00 Vol.2 58 11 2 2 2 1 67 Pa g e 7 2 o f 2 1 8 Page 5 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net WB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 12/06/23 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 06:00 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 07:00 0 28 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 08:00 0 20 6 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 09:00 0 21 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 10:00 0 30 6 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 11:00 0 32 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 12 PM 0 19 8 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 30 13:00 0 25 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 14:00 0 44 13 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 15:00 0 50 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 16:00 0 41 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 17:00 0 33 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 18:00 0 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 19:00 0 10 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 20:00 0 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 21:00 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 22:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Day Total 0 414 108 3 10 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 541 Percent 0.0%76.5%20.0%0.6%1.8%0.6%0.2%0.2%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 11:00 09:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 10:00 08:00 10:00 Vol. 32 7 2 1 2 1 1 38 PM Peak 15:00 14:00 14:00 12:00 15:00 Vol. 50 13 3 1 62 Pa g e 7 3 o f 2 1 8 Page 6 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net WB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 12/07/23 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:00 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 06:00 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 07:00 0 23 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 08:00 0 18 6 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 29 09:00 0 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 10:00 0 22 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 11:00 0 24 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 12 PM 1 38 8 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 13:00 0 28 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 14:00 1 35 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 15:00 2 39 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 16:00 1 34 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 51 17:00 0 29 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 18:00 0 24 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 19:00 0 17 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20:00 1 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 21:00 0 16 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 22:00 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23:00 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Day Total 6 399 107 3 13 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 532 Percent 1.1%75.0%20.1%0.6%2.4%0.2%0.0%0.2%0.2%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 11:00 07:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 11:00 Vol. 24 7 1 1 1 1 1 32 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 13:00 12:00 12:00 16:00 12:00 Vol.2 39 14 2 3 1 52 Grand Total 10 1205 325 10 35 8 1 2 4 1 0 0 0 1601 Percent 0.6%75.3%20.3%0.6%2.2%0.5%0.1%0.1%0.2%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0% Pa g e 7 4 o f 2 1 8 Page 1 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net EB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Pace Number Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Speed in Pace 12/05/23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 01:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14-23 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 03:00 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 20-29 2 04:00 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24-33 5 05:00 1 0 1 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 26-35 11 06:00 0 0 1 10 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 26-35 16 07:00 0 1 7 28 16 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 26-35 44 08:00 3 0 5 17 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 26-35 28 09:00 1 2 5 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 21-30 21 10:00 0 0 4 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 21-30 18 11:00 3 1 4 10 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 25-34 16 12 PM 0 0 4 19 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 26-35 28 13:00 0 0 1 10 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 26-35 17 14:00 2 0 0 19 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 26-35 25 15:00 0 0 7 23 10 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 26-35 33 16:00 1 0 2 15 11 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 33 26-35 26 17:00 0 1 3 15 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 26-35 28 18:00 0 1 6 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 21-30 11 19:00 0 0 1 5 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 26-35 11 20:00 0 0 1 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 26-35 18 21:00 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26-35 5 22:00 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19-28 2 23:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24-33 2 Total 11 6 54 234 127 33 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 470 Percent 2.3%1.3%11.5%49.8%27.0%7.0%0.9%0.0%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 08:00 09:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol.3 2 7 28 16 7 1 60 PM Peak 14:00 17:00 15:00 15:00 17:00 15:00 15:00 16:00 15:00 Vol.2 1 7 23 13 5 1 1 46 Pa g e 7 5 o f 2 1 8 Page 2 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net EB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Pace Number Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Speed in Pace 12/06/23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19-28 1 04:00 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24-33 3 05:00 3 0 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 24-33 7 06:00 0 0 4 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 26-35 15 07:00 0 0 5 24 22 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 26-35 46 08:00 2 2 4 26 11 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 26-35 37 09:00 1 0 4 15 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 26-35 24 10:00 0 2 3 16 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 25-34 21 11:00 0 1 6 19 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 26-35 28 12 PM 0 2 5 12 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 26-35 21 13:00 0 1 6 10 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 25-34 18 14:00 0 2 6 21 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 26-35 35 15:00 3 0 3 14 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 26-35 25 16:00 0 0 1 20 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 26-35 31 17:00 1 0 0 9 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 26-35 16 18:00 1 1 2 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 26-35 19 19:00 0 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 26-35 6 20:00 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 25-34 5 21:00 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24-33 3 22:00 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 21-30 3 23:00 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19-28 2 Total 11 11 55 227 138 26 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 473 Percent 2.3%2.3%11.6%48.0%29.2%5.5%0.8%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 05:00 08:00 11:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol.3 2 6 26 22 9 1 61 PM Peak 15:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 14:00 13:00 14:00 17:00 14:00 Vol.3 2 6 21 14 3 1 1 46 Pa g e 7 6 o f 2 1 8 Page 3 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net EB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Pace Number Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Speed in Pace 12/07/23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19-28 1 04:00 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 21-30 4 05:00 1 1 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 26-35 9 06:00 0 1 3 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 26-35 11 07:00 1 0 6 26 21 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 26-35 47 08:00 3 0 4 14 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 26-35 24 09:00 0 0 4 12 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 26-35 23 10:00 1 2 2 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 26-35 22 11:00 2 0 4 14 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 26-35 26 12 PM 2 1 5 10 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 24-33 16 13:00 0 1 6 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 21-30 13 14:00 0 0 3 15 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 26-35 24 15:00 2 1 3 17 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 25-34 22 16:00 0 2 5 17 12 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 26-35 29 17:00 0 1 1 12 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 26-35 18 18:00 0 1 3 10 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 26-35 18 19:00 0 0 2 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 21-30 7 20:00 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 21-30 3 21:00 0 0 1 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 25-34 11 22:00 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 15-24 3 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29-38 2 Total 12 12 58 200 125 36 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 450 Percent 2.7%2.7%12.9%44.4%27.8%8.0%1.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 08:00 10:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol.3 2 6 26 21 14 1 69 PM Peak 12:00 16:00 13:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 16:00 Vol.2 2 6 17 12 4 2 39 Total 34 29 167 661 390 95 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1393 Percent 2.4%2.1%12.0%47.5%28.0%6.8%1.1%0.1%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 15th Percentile : 24 MPH 50th Percentile : 28 MPH 85th Percentile : 33 MPH 95th Percentile : 37 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed : 26-35 MPH Number in Pace : 1051 Percent in Pace : 75.4% Number of Vehicles > 30 MPH : 502 Percent of Vehicles > 30 MPH : 36.0% Mean Speed(Average) : 29 MPH Pa g e 7 7 o f 2 1 8 Page 4 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net WB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Pace Number Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Speed in Pace 12/05/23 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14-23 1 01:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24-33 2 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 03:00 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24-33 3 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 05:00 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 25-34 3 06:00 0 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24-33 6 07:00 2 0 4 13 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 26-35 25 08:00 2 0 5 10 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 26-35 18 09:00 1 0 6 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 21-30 15 10:00 0 0 2 17 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 26-35 23 11:00 1 2 7 16 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 21-30 23 12 PM 2 2 2 19 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 26-35 29 13:00 0 1 1 25 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 26-35 31 14:00 2 2 6 22 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 26-35 35 15:00 1 0 12 32 20 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 26-35 52 16:00 5 1 5 31 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 26-35 40 17:00 0 2 5 20 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 26-35 34 18:00 0 0 6 11 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 26-35 23 19:00 0 0 1 10 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 26-35 13 20:00 0 1 3 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 16 21-30 11 21:00 0 0 1 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 26-35 11 22:00 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 26-35 3 23:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19-28 1 Total 17 12 68 261 135 30 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 528 Percent 3.2%2.3%12.9%49.4%25.6%5.7%0.6%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 11:00 11:00 10:00 07:00 08:00 10:00 07:00 Vol.2 2 7 17 12 4 1 34 PM Peak 16:00 12:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 16:00 22:00 19:00 20:00 15:00 Vol.5 2 12 32 20 5 1 1 1 67 Pa g e 7 8 o f 2 1 8 Page 5 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net WB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Pace Number Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Speed in Pace 12/06/23 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14-23 1 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24-33 1 05:00 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 20-29 3 06:00 0 0 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 21-30 7 07:00 1 0 3 17 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 26-35 25 08:00 2 1 3 13 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 26-35 23 09:00 1 1 5 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 26-35 21 10:00 1 0 4 23 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 26-35 31 11:00 0 0 9 18 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 21-30 27 12 PM 2 2 3 15 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 26-35 23 13:00 0 0 5 15 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 26-35 28 14:00 2 3 14 23 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 21-30 37 15:00 2 0 9 21 26 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 26-35 47 16:00 1 0 8 27 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 26-35 44 17:00 0 0 9 22 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 21-30 31 18:00 0 1 3 10 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 26-35 17 19:00 0 0 1 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26-35 11 20:00 1 1 6 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 21-30 13 21:00 1 0 1 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 24-33 10 22:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24-33 2 23:00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 20-29 2 Total 15 9 88 245 147 34 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 541 Percent 2.8%1.7%16.3%45.3%27.2%6.3%0.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 08:00 08:00 11:00 10:00 08:00 11:00 07:00 10:00 Vol.2 1 9 23 10 4 1 38 PM Peak 12:00 14:00 14:00 16:00 15:00 18:00 17:00 15:00 Vol.2 3 14 27 26 6 1 62 Pa g e 7 9 o f 2 1 8 Page 6 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net WB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Pace Number Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Speed in Pace 12/07/23 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19-28 1 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29-38 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19-28 1 04:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19-28 1 05:00 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 20-29 2 06:00 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 21-30 9 07:00 2 0 3 10 9 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 26-35 19 08:00 2 0 2 16 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 26-35 22 09:00 2 0 1 14 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 26-35 23 10:00 1 0 4 8 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 26-35 21 11:00 0 0 7 13 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 25-34 22 12 PM 3 1 2 28 16 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 52 26-35 44 13:00 0 1 3 25 11 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 26-35 36 14:00 2 1 5 13 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 26-35 29 15:00 4 2 2 25 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 26-35 40 16:00 4 1 6 26 11 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 26-35 37 17:00 0 1 6 14 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 26-35 24 18:00 1 1 2 17 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 26-35 24 19:00 0 0 5 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 21-30 17 20:00 0 0 2 9 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 26-35 16 21:00 0 1 1 10 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 26-35 16 22:00 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29-38 3 23:00 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 20-29 2 Total 22 9 56 253 148 36 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 532 Percent 4.1%1.7%10.5%47.6%27.8%6.8%1.3%0.0%0.0%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 11:00 08:00 10:00 07:00 07:00 11:00 Vol.2 7 16 13 5 1 32 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 16:00 12:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 12:00 12:00 Vol.4 2 6 28 16 4 2 1 52 Total 54 30 212 759 430 100 13 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1601 Percent 3.4%1.9%13.2%47.4%26.9%6.2%0.8%0.1%0.0%0.1%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0% 15th Percentile : 23 MPH 50th Percentile : 28 MPH 85th Percentile : 33 MPH 95th Percentile : 36 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed : 26-35 MPH Number in Pace : 1189 Percent in Pace : 74.3% Number of Vehicles > 30 MPH : 546 Percent of Vehicles > 30 MPH : 34.1% Mean Speed(Average) : 29 MPH Pa g e 8 0 o f 2 1 8 Page 1 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net Start 05-Dec-23 Time Tue EB WB Total 12:00 AM 0 1 1 01:00 1 2 3 02:00 0 0 0 03:00 3 3 6 04:00 5 0 5 05:00 14 4 18 06:00 18 7 25 07:00 60 34 94 08:00 40 29 69 09:00 27 21 48 10:00 22 27 49 11:00 27 34 61 12:00 PM 34 37 71 01:00 20 33 53 02:00 29 49 78 03:00 46 67 113 04:00 33 56 89 05:00 33 43 76 06:00 15 31 46 07:00 14 16 30 08:00 19 16 35 09:00 6 12 18 10:00 2 5 7 11:00 2 1 3 Total 470 528 998 Percent 47.1%52.9% AM Peak -07:00 07:00 ------07:00 Vol.-60 34 ------94 PM Peak -15:00 15:00 ------15:00 Vol.-46 67 ------113 Pa g e 8 1 o f 2 1 8 Page 2 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net Start 06-Dec-23 Time Wed EB WB Total 12:00 AM 0 2 2 01:00 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 03:00 1 0 1 04:00 4 1 5 05:00 12 4 16 06:00 19 8 27 07:00 61 33 94 08:00 48 32 80 09:00 30 28 58 10:00 27 38 65 11:00 37 37 74 12:00 PM 28 30 58 01:00 28 36 64 02:00 46 60 106 03:00 32 62 94 04:00 34 53 87 05:00 19 42 61 06:00 23 27 50 07:00 7 13 20 08:00 6 19 25 09:00 5 12 17 10:00 4 2 6 11:00 2 2 4 Total 473 541 1014 Percent 46.6%53.4% AM Peak -07:00 10:00 ------07:00 Vol.-61 38 ------94 PM Peak -14:00 15:00 ------14:00 Vol.-46 62 ------106 Pa g e 8 2 o f 2 1 8 Page 3 Site Code: 88 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net Start 07-Dec-23 Time Thu EB WB Total 12:00 AM 0 1 1 01:00 0 1 1 02:00 0 0 0 03:00 1 1 2 04:00 5 1 6 05:00 11 3 14 06:00 15 9 24 07:00 69 30 99 08:00 35 29 64 09:00 29 27 56 10:00 27 29 56 11:00 36 32 68 12:00 PM 25 52 77 01:00 18 43 61 02:00 30 41 71 03:00 29 50 79 04:00 39 51 90 05:00 24 35 59 06:00 23 31 54 07:00 10 20 30 08:00 5 19 24 09:00 12 19 31 10:00 4 5 9 11:00 3 3 6 Total 450 532 982 Percent 45.8%54.2% AM Peak -07:00 11:00 ------07:00 Vol.-69 32 ------99 PM Peak -16:00 12:00 ------16:00 Vol.-39 52 ------90 Grand Total 1393 1601 2994 Percent 46.5%53.5% ADT ADT 998 AADT 998 Pa g e 8 3 o f 2 1 8 Page 1 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net EB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 01/30/24 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 01:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:00 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 05:00 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 06:00 0 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 07:00 1 34 8 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 08:00 1 17 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 09:00 0 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10:00 0 7 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11:00 0 13 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 12 PM 1 29 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 13:00 0 12 10 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 14:00 0 27 7 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 15:00 1 41 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 16:00 2 26 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 17:00 0 23 7 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 33 18:00 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 19:00 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 20:00 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21:00 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 22:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Day Total 7 285 89 2 20 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 406 Percent 1.7%70.2%21.9%0.5%4.9%0.5%0.0%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol.1 34 8 1 3 47 PM Peak 16:00 15:00 12:00 15:00 14:00 12:00 17:00 15:00 Vol.2 41 11 1 4 1 1 54 Pa g e 8 4 o f 2 1 8 Page 2 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net EB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 01/31/24 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 05:00 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 06:00 0 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 07:00 1 34 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 08:00 0 14 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 09:00 0 16 7 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 10:00 1 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 11:00 0 15 7 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 25 12 PM 0 14 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 13:00 1 22 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 31 14:00 1 28 9 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 15:00 0 29 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 16:00 0 19 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 17:00 0 26 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 18:00 0 15 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 19:00 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 20:00 0 9 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 21:00 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 22:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Day Total 6 280 92 2 19 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 403 Percent 1.5%69.5%22.8%0.5%4.7%0.0%0.0%1.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 01:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 07:00 Vol.1 34 13 1 4 1 50 PM Peak 13:00 15:00 14:00 14:00 16:00 13:00 14:00 Vol.1 29 9 1 2 1 41 Pa g e 8 5 o f 2 1 8 Page 3 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net EB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/01/24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:00 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 06:00 0 6 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 07:00 1 29 8 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 08:00 0 20 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 09:00 0 10 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 10:00 0 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 11:00 0 11 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 12 PM 0 14 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 13:00 1 22 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 14:00 0 30 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 15:00 0 33 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 16:00 2 27 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 17:00 0 23 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 18:00 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 19:00 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 20:00 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 21:00 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 22:00 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Total 4 272 85 2 14 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 380 Percent 1.1%71.6%22.4%0.5%3.7%0.5%0.0%0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 11:00 07:00 Vol.1 29 8 1 2 1 1 41 PM Peak 16:00 15:00 16:00 14:00 12:00 13:00 15:00 Vol.2 33 10 1 2 1 42 Grand Total 17 837 266 6 53 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1189 Percent 1.4%70.4%22.4%0.5%4.5%0.3%0.0%0.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Pa g e 8 6 o f 2 1 8 Page 4 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net WB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 01/30/24 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 02:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 03:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 04:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 05:00 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 06:00 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 07:00 0 19 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 08:00 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 09:00 1 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 10:00 0 11 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 11:00 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 PM 0 13 7 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 13:00 0 12 4 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 14:00 0 12 9 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 15:00 0 18 9 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 31 16:00 0 36 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 17:00 0 23 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 29 18:00 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 19:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 20:00 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 21:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Total 1 200 61 3 13 7 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 290 Percent 0.3%69.0%21.0%1.0%4.5%2.4%0.3%1.0%0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 09:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 10:00 07:00 Vol.1 19 10 1 2 30 PM Peak 16:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 12:00 14:00 13:00 15:00 16:00 Vol. 36 9 1 3 3 1 1 1 41 Pa g e 8 7 o f 2 1 8 Page 5 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net WB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 01/31/24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 06:00 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 07:00 0 21 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 08:00 0 7 7 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 09:00 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10:00 0 11 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 11:00 0 15 4 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 23 12 PM 0 8 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 13:00 0 13 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 14:00 2 18 13 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 15:00 0 14 4 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 16:00 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 17:00 0 19 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 18:00 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 19:00 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 20:00 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 21:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 22:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Day Total 3 189 65 1 15 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 279 Percent 1.1%67.7%23.3%0.4%5.4%1.4%0.4%0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 01:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 08:00 11:00 07:00 Vol.1 21 10 1 3 1 1 32 PM Peak 14:00 17:00 14:00 14:00 14:00 15:00 14:00 Vol.2 19 13 2 1 1 36 Pa g e 8 8 o f 2 1 8 Page 6 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net WB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/01/24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 05:00 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 06:00 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 07:00 0 21 10 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 08:00 1 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 09:00 0 11 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 10:00 0 6 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11:00 0 9 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 12 PM 0 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 13:00 0 13 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 14:00 0 15 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 15:00 0 14 8 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 16:00 1 25 8 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 37 17:00 1 19 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 18:00 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 19:00 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 20:00 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 21:00 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 22:00 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Total 3 178 68 2 10 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 270 Percent 1.1%65.9%25.2%0.7%3.7%1.9%0.4%1.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 08:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 09:00 07:00 10:00 11:00 07:00 Vol.1 21 10 1 2 1 1 1 33 PM Peak 16:00 16:00 15:00 16:00 13:00 15:00 16:00 Vol.1 25 8 2 2 1 37 Grand Total 7 567 194 6 38 16 3 7 1 0 0 0 0 839 Percent 0.8%67.6%23.1%0.7%4.5%1.9%0.4%0.8%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Pa g e 8 9 o f 2 1 8 Page 1 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net EB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Pace Number Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Speed in Pace 01/30/24 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 20-29 2 01:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24-33 2 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19-28 1 04:00 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 20-29 3 05:00 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6-15 2 06:00 0 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 21-30 7 07:00 7 2 6 14 10 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 26-35 24 08:00 5 0 2 9 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 26-35 15 09:00 1 1 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 21-30 6 10:00 0 0 1 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 26-35 8 11:00 1 1 3 6 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 26-35 12 12 PM 2 1 5 22 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 26-35 32 13:00 2 0 8 10 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 21-30 18 14:00 1 1 1 13 14 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 26-35 27 15:00 2 0 9 24 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 26-35 37 16:00 9 0 2 13 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 26-35 25 17:00 1 1 3 19 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 26-35 25 18:00 4 0 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 26-35 9 19:00 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 26-35 7 20:00 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 20-29 4 21:00 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 20-29 3 22:00 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26-35 4 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24-33 1 Total 38 8 50 159 105 42 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 406 Percent 9.4%2.0%12.3%39.2%25.9%10.3%0.7%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 11:00 07:00 Vol.7 2 6 14 10 7 1 1 47 PM Peak 16:00 12:00 15:00 15:00 14:00 14:00 13:00 15:00 Vol.9 1 9 24 14 7 1 54 Pa g e 9 0 o f 2 1 8 Page 2 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net EB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Pace Number Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Speed in Pace 01/31/24 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14-23 1 01:00 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 9-18 2 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 04:00 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24-33 2 05:00 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8-17 1 06:00 2 2 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 21-30 8 07:00 2 1 2 24 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 26-35 42 08:00 1 0 4 11 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 26-35 18 09:00 1 1 3 9 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 26-35 18 10:00 2 0 2 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 26-35 12 11:00 1 0 6 12 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 21-30 18 12 PM 2 1 2 8 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 24-33 11 13:00 3 1 5 14 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 25-34 21 14:00 4 0 2 16 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 26-35 33 15:00 0 0 2 20 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 26-35 34 16:00 1 1 3 14 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 26-35 21 17:00 1 0 0 6 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 31-40 23 18:00 1 0 7 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 21-30 18 19:00 0 1 0 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26-35 5 20:00 2 0 1 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 26-35 6 21:00 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19-28 2 22:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 25-34 2 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24-33 1 Total 29 9 43 167 121 33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 403 Percent 7.2%2.2%10.7%41.4%30.0%8.2%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 01:00 06:00 11:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol.2 2 6 24 18 3 50 PM Peak 14:00 12:00 18:00 15:00 14:00 17:00 19:00 14:00 Vol.4 1 7 20 17 9 1 41 Pa g e 9 1 o f 2 1 8 Page 3 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net EB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Pace Number Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Speed in Pace 02/01/24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24-33 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 04:00 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9-18 1 05:00 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8-17 1 06:00 0 0 0 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26-35 10 07:00 4 3 7 12 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 26-35 24 08:00 2 1 2 13 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 26-35 19 09:00 1 1 1 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 26-35 13 10:00 4 0 1 4 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 26-35 8 11:00 0 1 4 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 24-33 11 12 PM 0 1 4 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 25-34 16 13:00 3 1 6 11 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 25-34 19 14:00 1 0 5 18 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 26-35 29 15:00 0 0 6 12 17 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 26-35 29 16:00 7 0 7 19 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 21-30 26 17:00 2 1 2 16 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 26-35 23 18:00 0 1 3 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 21-30 9 19:00 0 0 1 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 25-34 9 20:00 1 0 1 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26-35 5 21:00 0 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 26-35 6 22:00 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 19-28 2 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** Total 29 11 52 154 102 27 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 380 Percent 7.6%2.9%13.7%40.5%26.8%7.1%1.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 Vol.4 3 7 13 12 3 1 41 PM Peak 16:00 12:00 16:00 16:00 15:00 15:00 13:00 15:00 Vol.7 1 7 19 17 6 1 42 Total 96 28 145 480 328 102 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1189 Percent 8.1%2.4%12.2%40.4%27.6%8.6%0.8%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 15th Percentile : 21 MPH 50th Percentile : 28 MPH 85th Percentile : 33 MPH 95th Percentile : 37 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed : 26-35 MPH Number in Pace : 808 Percent in Pace : 68.0% Number of Vehicles > 30 MPH : 440 Percent of Vehicles > 30 MPH : 37.0% Mean Speed(Average) : 28 MPH Pa g e 9 2 o f 2 1 8 Page 4 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net WB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Pace Number Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Speed in Pace 01/30/24 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14-23 1 01:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19-28 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 25-34 2 03:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 25-34 2 04:00 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24-33 3 05:00 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 19-28 2 06:00 0 0 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24-33 6 07:00 2 2 6 9 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 24-33 16 08:00 0 0 0 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26-35 13 09:00 2 0 0 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 26-35 9 10:00 1 0 1 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 26-35 11 11:00 2 0 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 25-34 8 12 PM 4 0 4 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 21-30 16 13:00 0 1 6 6 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 21-30 12 14:00 2 2 1 14 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 26-35 18 15:00 1 0 10 14 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 21-30 24 16:00 0 1 3 12 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 26-35 33 17:00 2 0 2 14 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 26-35 22 18:00 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 19-28 3 19:00 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24-33 3 20:00 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19-28 2 21:00 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 25-34 5 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** Total 18 6 40 122 78 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 Percent 6.2%2.1%13.8%42.1%26.9%7.2%1.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol.2 2 6 9 7 3 1 30 PM Peak 12:00 14:00 15:00 14:00 16:00 16:00 13:00 16:00 Vol.4 2 10 14 21 4 2 41 Pa g e 9 3 o f 2 1 8 Page 5 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net WB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Pace Number Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Speed in Pace 01/31/24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 01:00 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9-18 2 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 05:00 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24-33 2 06:00 1 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 31-40 4 07:00 3 1 5 8 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 26-35 20 08:00 2 0 2 6 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 26-35 11 09:00 1 1 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26-35 7 10:00 3 2 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 24-33 8 11:00 1 1 6 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 21-30 15 12 PM 0 1 4 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 21-30 11 13:00 2 0 9 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 21-30 12 14:00 6 0 4 16 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 26-35 25 15:00 2 1 3 6 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 26-35 12 16:00 1 1 0 9 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 26-35 13 17:00 2 0 3 9 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 26-35 21 18:00 0 0 3 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21-30 9 19:00 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 26-35 3 20:00 0 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26-35 10 21:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19-28 1 22:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 25-34 2 23:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19-28 1 Total 28 11 42 101 77 14 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 279 Percent 10.0%3.9%15.1%36.2%27.6%5.0%1.8%0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 10:00 11:00 11:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 Vol.3 2 6 9 12 3 1 32 PM Peak 14:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 17:00 15:00 19:00 15:00 14:00 Vol.6 1 9 16 12 2 2 1 36 Pa g e 9 4 o f 2 1 8 Page 6 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net WB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Pace Number Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total Speed in Pace 02/01/24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** 04:00 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19-28 2 05:00 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24-33 3 06:00 1 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 26-35 6 07:00 5 1 3 10 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 26-35 22 08:00 1 0 2 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 23-32 10 09:00 1 2 0 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 26-35 13 10:00 2 3 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 21-30 6 11:00 1 0 0 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26-35 11 12 PM 0 0 1 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26-35 7 13:00 1 1 3 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 25-34 15 14:00 3 0 4 6 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 25-34 12 15:00 4 0 1 14 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 26-35 17 16:00 2 0 3 20 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 26-35 28 17:00 6 0 1 9 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 26-35 15 18:00 0 0 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 25-34 5 19:00 1 0 1 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 25-34 8 20:00 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 25-34 3 21:00 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 25-34 3 22:00 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24-33 2 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** Total 33 8 23 118 68 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 270 Percent 12.2%3.0%8.5%43.7%25.2%6.7%0.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 10:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 Vol.5 3 3 10 12 1 1 33 PM Peak 17:00 13:00 14:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 Vol.6 1 4 20 8 4 1 37 Total 79 25 105 341 223 53 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 839 Percent 9.4%3.0%12.5%40.6%26.6%6.3%1.4%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 15th Percentile : 21 MPH 50th Percentile : 28 MPH 85th Percentile : 33 MPH 95th Percentile : 37 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed : 26-35 MPH Number in Pace : 564 Percent in Pace : 67.2% Number of Vehicles > 30 MPH : 289 Percent of Vehicles > 30 MPH : 34.4% Mean Speed(Average) : 27 MPH Pa g e 9 5 o f 2 1 8 Page 1 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net Start 30-Jan-24 Time Tue EB WB Total 12:00 AM 2 1 3 01:00 2 1 3 02:00 0 2 2 03:00 1 2 3 04:00 4 4 8 05:00 5 4 9 06:00 8 8 16 07:00 47 30 77 08:00 26 13 39 09:00 9 12 21 10:00 11 15 26 11:00 20 12 32 12:00 PM 42 23 65 01:00 26 19 45 02:00 38 26 64 03:00 54 31 85 04:00 41 41 82 05:00 33 29 62 06:00 15 5 20 07:00 7 4 11 08:00 6 3 9 09:00 4 5 9 10:00 4 0 4 11:00 1 0 1 Total 406 290 696 Percent 58.3%41.7% AM Peak -07:00 07:00 ------07:00 Vol.-47 30 ------77 PM Peak -15:00 16:00 ------15:00 Vol.-54 41 ------85 Pa g e 9 6 o f 2 1 8 Page 2 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net Start 31-Jan-24 Time Wed EB WB Total 12:00 AM 1 0 1 01:00 4 3 7 02:00 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 04:00 4 0 4 05:00 3 3 6 06:00 13 7 20 07:00 50 32 82 08:00 24 18 42 09:00 26 10 36 10:00 17 16 33 11:00 25 23 48 12:00 PM 19 15 34 01:00 31 19 50 02:00 41 36 77 03:00 39 21 60 04:00 27 17 44 05:00 30 26 56 06:00 23 12 35 07:00 9 7 16 08:00 11 10 21 09:00 3 1 4 10:00 2 2 4 11:00 1 1 2 Total 403 279 682 Percent 59.1%40.9% AM Peak -07:00 07:00 ------07:00 Vol.-50 32 ------82 PM Peak -14:00 14:00 ------14:00 Vol.-41 36 ------77 Pa g e 9 7 o f 2 1 8 Page 3 Site Code: 90 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. alltrafficdata.net Start 01-Feb-24 Time Thu EB WB Total 12:00 AM 0 0 0 01:00 1 0 1 02:00 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 04:00 2 3 5 05:00 3 4 7 06:00 10 8 18 07:00 41 33 74 08:00 28 14 42 09:00 16 17 33 10:00 14 11 25 11:00 17 13 30 12:00 PM 21 9 30 01:00 31 20 51 02:00 38 21 59 03:00 42 24 66 04:00 41 37 78 05:00 34 26 60 06:00 11 8 19 07:00 10 10 20 08:00 9 5 14 09:00 7 4 11 10:00 4 3 7 11:00 0 0 0 Total 380 270 650 Percent 58.5%41.5% AM Peak -07:00 07:00 ------07:00 Vol.-41 33 ------74 PM Peak -15:00 16:00 ------16:00 Vol.-42 37 ------78 Grand Total 1189 839 2028 Percent 58.6%41.4% ADT ADT 676 AADT 676 Pa g e 9 8 o f 2 1 8 Extended Speed Summary W Court at Rd101 EB, EB End: 2026-01-29 Times: 0:00:00-23:59:59 Start: 2026-01-27 Speed Range: 1 to 150 Violation Threshold: Speed Limit + 10 Overall Summary Total Days of Data: 3 Speed Limit: 25 Average Speed: 28.46 50th Percentile Speed: 28.13 85th Percentile Speed: 33.43 Pace Speed Range: 24-34 Minimum Speed: 5 Maximum Speed: 61 Display Mode: Display Off Average Volume per Day: 527.0 Total Volume: 1581 Generated by Eric Ulvin on 01-30-2026Page 99 of 218 Extended Speed Summary W Court at Rd101 EB, EB End: 2026-01-29 Times: 0:00:00-23:59:59 Start: 2026-01-27 Speed Range: 1 to 150 Violation Threshold: Speed Limit + 10 Time Sign Mode Speed Limit Total # Vehicles Total # Violator % Violator Avg # Vehicles Avg # Violators Min Speed Max Speed Avg Speed 50% Speed 85% Speed Sign Effectiveness 0:00 Display Off 25 7 2 28.6%2.3 0.7 8 40 27.9 24.4 34.3 100.0% 1:00 Display Off 25 2 0 0.0%0.7 0.0 29 35 32.0 32.0 32.0 50.0% 2:00 Display Off 25 3 3 100.0%1.0 1.0 36 43 40.3 38.3 41.7 100.0% 3:00 Display Off 25 0 0 0.0%0.0 0.0 n/a 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4:00 Display Off 25 14 5 35.7%4.7 1.7 28 57 35.4 31.9 36.7 64.4% 5:00 Display Off 25 31 3 9.7%10.3 1.0 24 37 30.3 29.0 33.3 48.5% 6:00 Display Off 25 76 9 11.8%25.3 3.0 11 42 27.4 27.1 33.5 43.3% 7:00 Display Off 25 139 13 9.4%46.3 4.3 6 46 28.1 28.0 32.4 61.3% 8:00 Display Off 25 158 12 7.6%52.7 4.0 16 42 28.3 27.6 32.7 51.4% 9:00 Display Off 25 81 6 7.4%27.0 2.0 6 41 26.2 26.7 33.1 56.5% 10:00 Display Off 25 103 13 12.6%34.3 4.3 9 42 29.3 28.6 33.4 62.3% 11:00 Display Off 25 95 9 9.5%31.7 3.0 6 46 26.5 26.3 32.9 62.9% 12:00 Display Off 25 116 14 12.1%38.7 4.7 14 42 29.2 28.6 33.2 51.2% 13:00 Display Off 25 120 10 8.3%40.0 3.3 5 47 28.3 28.5 33.2 54.9% 14:00 Display Off 25 140 15 10.7%46.7 5.0 8 49 27.5 27.0 33.5 45.8% 15:00 Display Off 25 143 10 7.0%47.7 3.3 6 41 28.5 28.5 33.2 52.6% 16:00 Display Off 25 107 6 5.6%35.7 2.0 5 47 28.0 28.0 33.1 59.9% 17:00 Display Off 25 82 6 7.3%27.3 2.0 7 43 27.9 28.3 33.0 61.1% 18:00 Display Off 25 63 12 19.0%21.0 4.0 6 45 30.6 29.3 36.4 58.8% 19:00 Display Off 25 31 5 16.1%10.3 1.7 7 61 30.6 31.1 34.7 80.9% 20:00 Display Off 25 32 7 21.9%10.7 2.3 12 47 30.1 30.9 34.8 69.1% 21:00 Display Off 25 23 4 17.4%7.7 1.3 23 43 31.0 29.7 36.9 65.6% 22:00 Display Off 25 9 3 33.3%3.0 1.0 20 40 31.6 31.6 34.9 44.7% 23:00 Display Off 25 6 4 66.7%2.0 1.3 27 45 36.0 33.0 41.0 50.0% Total Volumes/ Avg Total/Avg w/o Feedback Total/Avg w/ Feedback 1581 1581 0 171 171 0 10.8% 10.8% 0 527.0 527.0 0.0 56.9 56.9 0.0 5 5 n/a 61 61 n/a 30.0 30.0 n/a 29.3 29.3 n/a 34.5 34.5 n/a 60.7% 60.7% n/a Generated by Eric Ulvin on 01-30-2026Page 100 of 218 Extended Speed Summary W Court at Rd101 WB, WB End: 2026-01-29 Times: 0:00:00-23:59:59 Start: 2026-01-27 Speed Range: 1 to 150 Violation Threshold: Speed Limit + 10 Overall Summary Total Days of Data: 3 Speed Limit: 25 Average Speed: 28.1 50th Percentile Speed: 28.22 85th Percentile Speed: 33.91 Pace Speed Range: 24-34 Minimum Speed: 5 Maximum Speed: 64 Display Mode: Display Off Average Volume per Day: 602.3 Total Volume: 1807 Generated by Eric Ulvin on 01-30-2026Page 101 of 218 Extended Speed Summary W Court at Rd101 WB, WB End: 2026-01-29 Times: 0:00:00-23:59:59 Start: 2026-01-27 Speed Range: 1 to 150 Violation Threshold: Speed Limit + 10 Time Sign Mode Speed Limit Total # Vehicles Total # Violator % Violator Avg # Vehicles Avg # Violators Min Speed Max Speed Avg Speed 50% Speed 85% Speed Sign Effectiveness 0:00 Display Off 25 4 2 50.0%1.3 0.7 5 40 26.8 17.8 35.3 50.0% 1:00 Display Off 25 2 2 100.0%0.7 0.7 36 44 40.0 40.0 40.0 50.0% 2:00 Display Off 25 3 0 0.0%1.0 0.0 27 29 28.3 27.7 29.0 66.7% 3:00 Display Off 25 1 0 0.0%0.3 0.0 25 25 25.0 25.0 25.0 100.0% 4:00 Display Off 25 2 0 0.0%0.7 0.0 25 29 27.0 25.0 29.0 100.0% 5:00 Display Off 25 9 0 0.0%3.0 0.0 26 35 30.3 27.6 34.1 66.6% 6:00 Display Off 25 39 4 10.3%13.0 1.3 12 44 27.7 26.0 32.9 51.3% 7:00 Display Off 25 72 7 9.7%24.0 2.3 6 46 28.1 27.1 32.6 55.6% 8:00 Display Off 25 139 16 11.5%46.3 5.3 6 41 27.4 28.1 33.4 56.0% 9:00 Display Off 25 79 11 13.9%26.3 3.7 6 46 29.2 28.2 34.0 58.5% 10:00 Display Off 25 107 18 16.8%35.7 6.0 5 47 27.1 28.5 35.9 68.3% 11:00 Display Off 25 95 11 11.6%31.7 3.7 6 45 26.3 27.0 33.2 72.8% 12:00 Display Off 25 130 14 10.8%43.3 4.7 6 50 28.3 29.0 34.3 71.1% 13:00 Display Off 25 175 13 7.4%58.3 4.3 5 43 27.5 28.3 32.6 61.1% 14:00 Display Off 25 194 20 10.3%64.7 6.7 6 45 26.5 26.8 32.8 64.4% 15:00 Display Off 25 191 19 9.9%63.7 6.3 5 40 28.0 27.6 34.0 67.9% 16:00 Display Off 25 174 10 5.7%58.0 3.3 5 49 28.2 28.9 32.7 80.4% 17:00 Display Off 25 109 8 7.3%36.3 2.7 5 51 28.4 28.0 33.5 73.1% 18:00 Display Off 25 106 12 11.3%35.3 4.0 5 47 28.7 29.1 35.0 74.8% 19:00 Display Off 25 69 13 18.8%23.0 4.3 9 64 31.0 30.3 36.3 68.1% 20:00 Display Off 25 36 8 22.2%12.0 2.7 18 60 33.1 31.9 40.2 83.5% 21:00 Display Off 25 48 14 29.2%16.0 4.7 8 49 30.6 30.3 37.6 66.7% 22:00 Display Off 25 18 3 16.7%6.0 1.0 22 39 30.4 29.0 32.8 83.3% 23:00 Display Off 25 5 1 20.0%1.7 0.3 27 41 33.4 33.0 36.8 80.0% Total Volumes/ Avg Total/Avg w/o Feedback Total/Avg w/ Feedback 1807 1807 0 206 206 0 11.4% 11.4% 0 602.3 602.3 0.0 68.7 68.7 0.0 5 5 n/a 64 64 n/a 29.1 29.1 n/a 28.3 28.3 n/a 33.9 33.9 n/a 69.6% 69.6% n/a Generated by Eric Ulvin on 01-30-2026Page 102 of 218 Extended Speed Summary W Court at Rd109 EB, EB End: 2026-01-29 Times: 0:00:00-23:59:59 Start: 2026-01-27 Speed Range: 1 to 150 Violation Threshold: Speed Limit + 10 Overall Summary Total Days of Data: 3 Speed Limit: 25 Average Speed: 27.18 50th Percentile Speed: 27.1 85th Percentile Speed: 31.73 Pace Speed Range: 23-33 Minimum Speed: 5 Maximum Speed: 43 Display Mode: Display Off Average Volume per Day: 200.3 Total Volume: 601 Generated by Eric Ulvin on 01-30-2026Page 103 of 218 Extended Speed Summary W Court at Rd109 EB, EB End: 2026-01-29 Times: 0:00:00-23:59:59 Start: 2026-01-27 Speed Range: 1 to 150 Violation Threshold: Speed Limit + 10 Time Sign Mode Speed Limit Total # Vehicles Total # Violator % Violator Avg # Vehicles Avg # Violators Min Speed Max Speed Avg Speed 50% Speed 85% Speed Sign Effectiveness 0:00 Display Off 25 3 0 0.0%1.0 0.0 31 33 32.3 31.7 32.3 100.0% 1:00 Display Off 25 1 1 100.0%0.3 0.3 37 37 37.0 37.0 37.0 0.0% 2:00 Display Off 25 1 0 0.0%0.3 0.0 24 24 24.0 24.0 24.0 0.0% 3:00 Display Off 25 0 0 0.0%0.0 0.0 n/a 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4:00 Display Off 25 2 0 0.0%0.7 0.0 31 31 31.0 31.0 31.0 100.0% 5:00 Display Off 25 8 0 0.0%2.7 0.0 22 29 25.8 24.5 26.5 100.0% 6:00 Display Off 25 24 3 12.5%8.0 1.0 14 36 27.6 25.8 33.9 66.9% 7:00 Display Off 25 52 2 3.8%17.3 0.7 21 39 28.3 27.8 31.1 61.6% 8:00 Display Off 25 55 3 5.5%18.3 1.0 7 40 27.0 27.3 32.5 78.3% 9:00 Display Off 25 22 1 4.5%7.3 0.3 7 40 26.7 27.0 30.1 77.2% 10:00 Display Off 25 38 5 13.2%12.7 1.7 6 37 27.1 26.3 31.6 76.4% 11:00 Display Off 25 37 1 2.7%12.3 0.3 5 38 25.3 24.8 30.5 51.4% 12:00 Display Off 25 45 4 8.9%15.0 1.3 11 39 27.7 27.4 31.7 64.5% 13:00 Display Off 25 42 3 7.1%14.0 1.0 5 38 27.7 27.7 32.0 76.3% 14:00 Display Off 25 60 9 15.0%20.0 3.0 5 43 27.3 28.0 34.4 75.2% 15:00 Display Off 25 68 6 8.8%22.7 2.0 11 37 28.0 28.4 31.7 67.8% 16:00 Display Off 25 55 3 5.5%18.3 1.0 5 41 24.8 25.8 29.3 80.1% 17:00 Display Off 25 31 1 3.2%10.3 0.3 5 36 26.7 26.9 30.9 64.5% 18:00 Display Off 25 23 5 21.7%7.7 1.7 22 42 29.9 28.5 35.3 74.1% 19:00 Display Off 25 15 1 6.7%5.0 0.3 18 38 29.3 28.7 33.6 86.8% 20:00 Display Off 25 10 1 10.0%3.3 0.3 6 36 23.4 22.8 28.6 80.0% 21:00 Display Off 25 6 0 0.0%2.0 0.0 23 35 27.5 26.0 32.5 83.5% 22:00 Display Off 25 2 0 0.0%0.7 0.0 5 33 19.0 19.0 19.0 100.0% 23:00 Display Off 25 1 0 0.0%0.3 0.0 32 32 32.0 32.0 32.0 0.0% Total Volumes/ Avg Total/Avg w/o Feedback Total/Avg w/ Feedback 601 601 0 49 49 0 8.2% 8.2% 0 200.3 200.3 0.0 16.2 16.2 0.0 5 5 n/a 43 43 n/a 27.6 27.6 n/a 27.3 27.3 n/a 30.9 30.9 n/a 68.0% 68.0% n/a Generated by Eric Ulvin on 01-30-2026Page 104 of 218 Extended Speed Summary W Court at Rd109 WB, WB End: 2026-01-29 Times: 0:00:00-23:59:59 Start: 2026-01-27 Speed Range: 1 to 150 Violation Threshold: Speed Limit + 10 Overall Summary Total Days of Data: 3 Speed Limit: 25 Average Speed: 26.67 50th Percentile Speed: 27.12 85th Percentile Speed: 31.97 Pace Speed Range: 23-33 Minimum Speed: 5 Maximum Speed: 49 Display Mode: Display Off Average Volume per Day: 327.3 Total Volume: 982 Generated by Eric Ulvin on 01-30-2026Page 105 of 218 Extended Speed Summary W Court at Rd109 WB, WB End: 2026-01-29 Times: 0:00:00-23:59:59 Start: 2026-01-27 Speed Range: 1 to 150 Violation Threshold: Speed Limit + 10 Time Sign Mode Speed Limit Total # Vehicles Total # Violator % Violator Avg # Vehicles Avg # Violators Min Speed Max Speed Avg Speed 50% Speed 85% Speed Sign Effectiveness 0:00 Display Off 25 5 0 0.0%1.7 0.0 5 34 16.4 10.8 11.6 60.0% 1:00 Display Off 25 1 1 100.0%0.3 0.3 39 39 39.0 39.0 39.0 100.0% 2:00 Display Off 25 1 0 0.0%0.3 0.0 24 24 24.0 24.0 24.0 100.0% 3:00 Display Off 25 0 0 0.0%0.0 0.0 n/a 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4:00 Display Off 25 2 0 0.0%1.0 0.0 28 30 29.0 28.0 30.0 100.0% 5:00 Display Off 25 8 0 0.0%4.0 0.0 25 35 30.6 32.0 32.8 37.4% 6:00 Display Off 25 32 4 12.5%16.0 2.0 5 40 26.4 26.0 32.9 56.4% 7:00 Display Off 25 46 2 4.3%15.3 0.7 19 40 27.3 27.0 32.3 63.1% 8:00 Display Off 25 79 4 5.1%26.3 1.3 5 38 25.6 26.4 30.8 50.5% 9:00 Display Off 25 59 3 5.1%19.7 1.0 6 39 26.3 26.9 32.1 62.6% 10:00 Display Off 25 61 2 3.3%20.3 0.7 5 41 23.3 24.2 30.7 67.3% 11:00 Display Off 25 54 2 3.7%18.0 0.7 11 39 27.4 28.1 32.7 59.3% 12:00 Display Off 25 72 2 2.8%24.0 0.7 6 36 23.7 25.3 31.0 59.5% 13:00 Display Off 25 82 4 4.9%27.3 1.3 11 42 27.0 27.7 31.8 70.8% 14:00 Display Off 25 96 8 8.3%32.0 2.7 9 48 26.5 26.6 32.9 59.6% 15:00 Display Off 25 116 7 6.0%38.7 2.3 8 43 28.1 28.1 32.1 56.0% 16:00 Display Off 25 90 3 3.3%30.0 1.0 6 41 26.2 27.0 30.7 63.3% 17:00 Display Off 25 51 4 7.8%17.0 1.3 8 38 27.1 28.0 31.9 66.8% 18:00 Display Off 25 39 2 5.1%13.0 0.7 9 36 27.6 27.5 32.4 85.0% 19:00 Display Off 25 34 5 14.7%11.3 1.7 10 42 29.6 29.7 33.6 67.8% 20:00 Display Off 25 27 4 14.8%9.0 1.3 7 43 27.3 28.5 34.4 70.6% 21:00 Display Off 25 18 5 27.8%6.0 1.7 23 49 32.2 31.2 38.7 72.3% 22:00 Display Off 25 5 2 40.0%1.7 0.7 29 36 33.8 32.2 35.0 80.0% 23:00 Display Off 25 4 0 0.0%1.3 0.0 29 34 32.3 32.3 33.8 75.3% Total Volumes/ Avg Total/Avg w/o Feedback Total/Avg w/ Feedback 982 982 0 64 64 0 6.5% 6.5% 0 334.3 334.3 0.0 22.1 22.1 0.0 5 5 n/a 49 49 n/a 27.7 27.7 n/a 27.7 27.7 n/a 31.6 31.6 n/a 68.9% 68.9% n/a Generated by Eric Ulvin on 01-30-2026Page 106 of 218 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 16, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/13/26 FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager City Manager SUBJECT: Targeted Urban Area (TUA) Tax Exemption Program (10 minutes) I. ATTACHMENT(S): City of Pasco Industrial Zone Map Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Unknown IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background: Targeted Urban Areas (TUA’s) are a new recruitment, retention, and expansion tool available in Washington per Chapter 84.25 of the Revised Code of Washington. It allows cities and counties to offer certain exemptions from property taxes for up to ten years the value of new construction of industrial and manufacturing facilities in qualifying designated geographic areas. exemption tax property (TUA) Urban Targeted State's Washington Area program, codified under Chapter 84.25 RCW became effective July 1, 2022. The and program's stated purpose is to encourage new manufacturing industrial development on undeveloped or underutilized lands zoned for those uses. It does so by allowing cities and counties to exempt the value of newly constructed manufacturing facilities from property taxation for a period of ten years. The exemption applies only to the improvement value of qualifying new construction; land value and non-manufacturing-related improvements such as administrative offices are not included. Page 107 of 218 To qualify, a company must: 1. Certify that the availability of the tax exemption is the deciding factor in choosing to locate in Washington State; commonly referred to as the "but-for" test. 2. Commit to creating a minimum of 25 new family-living-wage jobs averaging at least $23 per hour with health care benefits, construct a minimum of 10,000 square feet of new manufacturing space (not an addition to an existing structure) 3. Meet a minimum improvement value of $800,000 as defined under U.S. Department of Labor Division D (Manufacturing) or Division E (Transportation) classifications. The City of Richland was the first jurisdictions in Washington to implement the TUA Benton 2023. early in County its adopting exemption, program subsequently followed by adopting a matching TUA boundary, a coordination that proved administratively essential, as the two jurisdictions learned that non- identical boundaries create significant implementation complications. Impact: Adopting a Targeted Urban Area designation would position Pasco as a more competitive destination for manufacturing investment at a time when the region's industrial land supply represents a meaningful economic development asset. The program directly advances the Council's goal of expanding family- wage a to exemption the tying Pasco in opportunities employment by mandatory job creation threshold. Because the exemption applies only to new construction value and does not reduce any existing assessed value on the tax rolls, no current property owner or taxing district experiences a loss of existing revenue. shift: tax property a program does the However, produce Washington's levy rate system means that exempting new assessed value from the pool effectively spreads the existing levy, causing a rate increase for other property owners during the exemption period. This impact, while generally small at the individual level, is real and should be communicated transparently to the public should Council elect to move forward. The overall tax shift impact on the broader property-owning population varies depending on several factors, including the value of any property tax exemptions granted to the manufacturing company, the assessed valuation of individual properties, and changes to the City's property tax rate over the relevant period. V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation: Staff recommends that Council provide direction on whether to proceed with the next steps toward formally establishing a Pasco Targeted Urban Area. Staff believes the program merits serious consideration given Pasco's industrial land Page 108 of 218 inventory and the region's growing interest in manufacturing investment, however recommends approval to coordinate with Franklin County before City takes any formal action. Constraints: Two implementation constraints deserve Council's attention before proceeding. 1. Franklin County Assessor's Office is currently engaged in implementing Tax Increment Financing (TIF) within their assessment software, and that system does not currently support the TUA program. Should the City move forward, the County will need to engage their software vendor to develop TUA compatible functionality, a process that may introduce lead time between Council action and full program implementation. 2. Experience shared by the Benton County Assessor's Office underscores that the City's TUA boundary and the County's TUA boundary must be identical for the program to function effectively. Misaligned boundaries create administrative complexity and risk of error that could undermine the program's credibility with prospective applicants. Early and coordinated engagement with Franklin County is therefore highly recommended. Next Steps: If Council provides direction to proceed, City will take the following steps in sequence. 1. Identify contiguous parcels within City limits that are zoned for industrial and of definition statutory the and uses manufacturing meet undeveloped or underutilized land. 2. Initiate direct engagement with Franklin County Assessor's Office and the on TUA shared a align Commissioners County of Board to timeline, boundary, discuss the County's software readiness and determine whether the County intends to adopt a parallel resolution extending the exemption to county property taxes. 3. Once those foundational elements are in place, staff will return to Council with a proposed Resolution of Intent to designate the Pasco TUA and schedule the required public hearing. The public hearing notice must be published for two consecutive weeks, no more than 30 days before the hearing date. 4. Final Council action in the form of an ordinance or resolution formally establishing the Pasco Targeted Urban Area would follow the public hearing. 5. Staff prepares a program plan for Council review to outline program process from application to tax exemption. Alternatives: 1. Take no action at this time, preserving the ability to revisit the program at a future date. Page 109 of 218 1 Item:Industrial Zoning Citywide.Applicants:City of PascoZ0nlngFile#;EXEC 2024—009 Industria \O llll-l °“at h g ,V Page 110 of 218 Pasco City Council April 13, 2026 Targeted Urban Area (TUA)Pa g e 1 1 1 o f 2 1 8 AGENDA 01 Program Overview What is the Targeted Urban Area 02 Eligibility & Requirements Criteria for companies and qualifying projects 03 How Property Taxes Work Exemption mechanics and the property tax shift 04 Benefits & Community Impact Jobs, investment, and revenue considerations 05 Implementation Considerations Collaborations, resource challenges, coordination needs 06 Next Steps Council action required to move forward Pa g e 1 1 2 o f 2 1 8 PROGRAM OVERVIEW Legislative Purpose: "To encourage new manufacturing and industrial uses on undeveloped and underutilized lands zoned for industrial and manufacturing uses in Targeted Urban Areas." Enacted Amended by the Washington State Legislature in 2021 Effective July 1, 2022 Who Can Adopt Cities AND counties may establish a Targeted Urban Area (TUA) State Precedent City of Richland was first to implement (early 2023) Benton County followed, adopting matching TUA boundary Goal: Level the Playing Field Washington state has historically struggled to attract manufacturing investment. The TUA exemption is designed to make state competitive with lower-cost states by removing a key financial barrier during a facility's construction and early operating years. Pa g e 1 1 3 o f 2 1 8 ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS TUA LAND CRITERIA Must be within City limits Zoned for industrial/manufacturing use Must consist of undeveloped or underutilized lands TUA boundary must be contiguous Counties may adopt same or overlapping boundary by separate resolution COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS But-For Certification Must certify the project would NOT be built in Washington without the exemption 25 Living Wage Jobs Minimum 25 new jobs at $23/hr+ avg., 2,080 hrs/year with health benefits 10,000 sq ft Minimum New construction only —not an addition to an existing building $800,000 Min. Value For Division D (Manufacturing) or Division E (Transportation) uses per USDOL Pa g e 1 1 4 o f 2 1 8 HOW THE PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION WORKS ✓EXEMPT FROM TAXATION •Value of new construction •Manufacturing/industrial facility improvements •Exempt for 10 successive years •City property taxes only (unless county separately opts in) ✗NOT EXEMPT •Land value •Non-manufacturing improvements (e.g. admin offices) •County property taxes (unless county adopts resolution) •Other applicable state or local taxes IMPORTANT: The Property Tax Shift Washington's property tax system operates on levy rate limits. When new construction value is exempted, the total assessed value in the levy pool is reduced —meaning the existing tax levy is spread across fewer dollars of assessed value. This causes a modest property tax rate INCREASE for all other property owners in the City during the exemption period. The effect is generally small on an individual basis but is a real and tangible shift that Council should be aware of and communicate to the public. Pa g e 1 1 5 o f 2 1 8 BENEFITS TO MANUFACTURERS & COMMUNITY For Manufacturers 10-Year Tax ReliefExemption on the full value of new construction for a decade —reducing operating costs during critical early years Competitive Advantage Levels the playing field vs. lower-tax states when making location decisions Certainty Locked-in exemption provides financial predictability for project pro formas For Pasco Community Family-Wage Jobs $23/hr+ wages with healthcare —minimum 25 jobs per project, anchored locally Construction Revenue Sales tax collected during construction phase flows immediately to local government No Lost Revenue Exemption applies only to NEW value —no existing revenues are reduced Future Tax Base Growth After 10-year exemption period, full assessed value enters the tax rolls permanently Pa g e 1 1 6 o f 2 1 8 IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS Assessor Software —Current Limitation Franklin County Assessor's Office is currently implementing Tax Increment Financing (TIF) in their assessment software. Their current system does not yet support the TUA program. Should the City move forward, the County will need to work with their software provider to develop a compatible TUA module. This may introduce a lead time before the program can be fully administered. Early communication with the County is strongly encouraged. Lesson from Benton County —Boundary Alignment is Critical Benton County Assessor's Office has shared from direct experience: if the City TUA boundary and the County TUA boundary are not identical, the program becomes extremely difficult to administer. Pasco should coordinate closely with Franklin County to ensure both jurisdictions adopt the exact same TUA boundary before either adopts a resolution —otherwise administration complexity and errors become significant risks. Pa g e 1 1 7 o f 2 1 8 ONCE TUA IS ESTABLISHED | Program Administration Process 1 Application 90 days to approve/deny • Council approval • Staff initial review 2 Conditional Certificate Issued within 90-day window • Sent to County & City Admin 3 Construction Completion 3 year max from cert date • Owner Statement + Certificate of Occupancy 4 Certificate of Exemption Issued to County within 10 days of 30-day audit period 5 Exemption Effective January 1 following project approval 6 Annual Reporting Owner reports within 30 days of cert anniversary • County tracks 7 Report to State Commerce City administrative report due December 31 each year Pa g e 1 1 8 o f 2 1 8 NEXT STEPS | Required Actions 1 Identify TUA Map Determine contiguous parcels within City limits zoned for industrial/manufacturing. Must be undeveloped or underutilized. 2 Coordinate with Franklin County Engage the County Assessor and Commissioners. Align on identical TUA boundary and timeline for software readiness (TIF currently being implemented). 3 Council Determination of Benefit City Council confirms the TUA will assist in new construction of industrial facilities that provide Family Living Wage jobs per Ch. 84.25.030. 4 Adopt Resolution of Intent Adopt a resolution expressing intent to designate the TUA area and schedule a Public Hearing. 5 Publish Public Hearing Notice Two consecutive weeks of publication, no more than 30 days prior to hearing date. 6 Council Formal Action Formal ordinance/resolution to establish the Pasco Targeted Urban Area —requires a Council action item. Pa g e 1 1 9 o f 2 1 8 KEY TAKEAWAYS TUA is a powerful economic development tool to attract manufacturing and family- wage jobs to Pasco The exemption applies to new construction value only —no existing revenues are lost A property tax shift to other property owners occurs during the 10-year exemption — this should be communicated transparently The County's current software does not support TUA —Additional work needed Benton County experience: City and County TUA boundaries must be identical for effective administration Pa g e 1 2 0 o f 2 1 8 Questions Pa g e 1 2 1 o f 2 1 8 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 23, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/13/26 FROM: Haylie Matson, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Ordinance - Special Event Code and Downtown Update I. ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Proposed Ordinance Special Events, Assemblies and Sales 2. Special Events and Sales Permit Code Update Memorandum - Framework 3. Powerpoint II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommend that the City Council review the attached draft ordinance and Council discussion and provide direction to staff. A public hearing is scheduled for April 20, 2026. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Streamlining the event permit process is anticipated to have a positive effect on the Community and Economic Development Budget at the same time as decreasing the amount of effort and expense event organizers expend organizing, hosting and obtaining permits for special events and sales. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background During the Downtown Master Planning process, significant feedback was received regarding the cumbersome and confusing nature of the Special Event permit process. In response, the city continued its partnership with Framework Cultural Placemaking to audit Title 5 codes, permit processes, and potential code amendments related to Special Events and sales activities. On August 25, 2025, the Community & Economic Development Department presented an overview to City Council outlining the goals of the update and key findings from the initial code audit. City Council provided feedback and Page 122 of 218 direction to staff at that time. An outreach event was held on February 17th and applicable suggestions related to the outreach have been incorporated into the draft ordinance. This effort is intended to modernize and simplify the City’s Special Event and sales-related permitting processes while maintaining appropriate safety on updates proposed The focus administrative and standards oversight. making the process clearer, predictable, and user-friendly for applicants and staff, while supporting vibrant community events and economic activity. The Special Event process update is one of several implementation actions currently Key Plan. Master Pasco the to related underway Downtown downtown-focused activities in progress include:  Special Event process updates: Work is underway to update and streamline the Special Event permitting process. Completion, including Council action, is anticipated by the end of the first quarter of 2026.  Downtown alleyway lighting: Alleyway lighting is in development; an update will be brought to Council later this month. Several nearby property owners have already improved alley lighting.  Murals and public art: Murals supported by LTAC have been installed downtown. The Peanuts statue installation is forthcoming, and utility box artwork has been installed.  Mobile vending pilot program: A downtown mobile cart and truck vending pilot location program have been launched. Several vendors have expressed interest, and outreach will continue.  Clark Street improvements project: Public Works has secured state grant funding for the Clark Street Improvements project (2nd–10th Avenue) to bring to life the roadway section conceptualized in the Downtown Masterplan. The project will include roadway configuration changes, pedestrian safety improvements, bicycle accommodation, and bulb-outs to decrease crossing distances for pedestrians. Design work is expected in anticipated with 2026, construction in begin to early 2027/2028.  Lewis Street Underpass demolition project: Public Works secured a state grant to demolish the top six feet of the Lewis Street underpass to meet contractual obligations with Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad. of Street Lewis the element is final the This remaining Overpass project. Demolition removes a deteriorated structure over active water lines, reducing the risk of collapse and protecting a critical utility corridor. It also allows BNSF to expand rail operations, potentially adding up to nine tracks to support freight movement and industrial growth at the Port of Pasco and in the region. Design and coordination with BNSF are underway, with construction planned for later in 2026.  Recent downtown support actions:efforts Completed include issuance of a sprinkler-requirement clarification memo for tenants and business owners, allocation of Community Development Block Grant Page 123 of 218 (CDBG) funds to assist downtown businesses with sprinkler feasibility studies, completion of two façade improvements, and assistance to businesses affected by the Lewis Street overpass closure. Broader downtown initiatives led by the Community & Economic Development Department will largely be on hold later this year while staff focus on completion of the 2046 Comprehensive Plan update and associated development code updates needed to implement that plan. Special Event Code Audit Process: The consultant and City team completed the following work:  Overall review of Title 5 – Business Licenses and Regulations to evaluate clarity, organization, and compatibility with project goals  Interviews with representatives from the Police Department, Parks Department, Business Licensing Division, and HAPO Center  Precedent study evaluating how other Tri-Cities jurisdictions manage Special Events  Presentation to and feedback from City Council (August 25, 2025)  Presentation to past and frequent special event hosts and public on February 17, 2026 to solicit feedback on draft Ordinance The outcome of the audit guided the development of the draft code amendments presented with this report. Primary improvements include:  Establishing clear thresholds for when Special Event permits are required  Eliminating or consolidating permits that were redundant or unnecessary  Creating an Event Risk Factor Scoring Matrix to provide objective security activities, size, event alcohol based recommendations on service, and other risk factors  Clarifying rules for street closures and neighborhood block parties  Streamlining the permit review process to reduce turnaround time  Simplifying Temporary Sales Event and sidewalk-sales permitting  February 17th outreach event yielded good questions from the public and we received generally positive feedback on the draft Ordinance Impact (other than fiscal): Providing a clearer and more predictable framework for organizing events is expected to encourage more community events and cultural activities, support economic development opportunities for local businesses and vendors, and reduce confusion and administrative burden for both applicants and staff. The proposed updates will also help maintain consistent safety expectations for public gatherings. Overall, these changes are intended to make events easier to organize, easier to administer, and safer for participants, while supporting the Downtown Master Plan goal of increasing activity and vibrancy in Pasco. Page 124 of 218 V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation: Staff recommend that the City Council review the attached draft ordinance and Council discussion and provide direction to staff. A public hearing is scheduled for April 20, 2026. Constraints (time or other consideration): The timeline for adoption will depend on City Council direction, completion of final draft code language, and scheduling of the required public hearing process. The public hearing for this matter is currently scheduled for April 20th. Adoption at that time is anticipated unless City Council proposes substantial changes to the proposed approach that require additional staff analysis or revisions. Next Steps: A public hearing is scheduled for April 20, 2026. Alternatives: The City Council may elect to forgo special event permit amendments or direct staff to consider alternative approaches to enhance special events and sales in the City of Pasco. Page 125 of 218 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AMENDING TITLE 5 BUSINESS LICENSES AND REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE PASCO DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN BY EXPANDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMUNITY EVENTS AND SALES THROUGHOUT THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) adopted its first Downtown Master Plan in January 2023 following extensive public engagement that resulted in strong support for the plan; and WHEREAS, the City and the community have prioritized implementing the Downtown Pasco Master Plan which is an ongoing effort; and WHEREAS, the Downtown Master Plan includes many strategies to activate public spaces including expanding opportunities for community events and commerce; and WHEREAS, applicants for Special Event Permits have expressed that the application process includes unreasonable barriers; and WHEREAS, the City benefits from increased foot traffic in commercial areas that results from community events; and WHEREAS, expanding the ways in which residents can exchange goods promotes local culture and resilient communities; and WHEREAS, the City desires to streamline permit processes while ensuring that adequate regulations remain in place to ensure public safety. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amending the Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 5.35 Special Events and Entertainment Chapter 5.35 SPECIAL EVENTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, ASSEMBLIES, AND SALES Sections: 5.35.010 Finding and purpose. Intent. 5.35.020 Permit required. Definitions. 5.35.030 Exemption to permit requirements. Special Events in Public Space. 5.35.040 Definitions. Road Closures. 5.35.050 Application. Special Assemblies. 5.35.060 Temporary special sales event. Temporary Sales. Page 126 of 218 5.35.070 Dance halls. Security Assessment. 5.35.080 Auction sales. Procedure for Application Approval. 5.35.090 Public dance. Appeal. 5.35.100 Carnivals and circuses. Revocation of Permit. 5.35.110 Concerts, outdoor music festivals and athletic or competitive events. 5.35.120 Outdoor music festival – Additional requirements. 5.35.130 Permit fee. 5.35.140 Procedure for application approval. 5.35.150 Appeal. 5.35.160 Revocation of permit. 5.35.170 Crowd and traffic control. 5.35.180 Street and intersection closures. 5.35.010 Finding and purpose. Intent The City finds that to preserve each citizen’s right of free speech and assembly, in both public and private places, the coordination of the City services is necessary to maintain the safety of the persons and properties of the participants and those electing not to participate in the event, and to provide continued municipal services for the benefit of all the citizens of the City, minimal regulations are necessary to provide for the coordination of essential municipal services. These regulations are established for the purpose of regulating those events which are intended to draw large numbers of people, involve use of public facilities and to establish a fee required to defray the costs of assuring the public health and safety. [Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.005.] Special events are opportunities for Pasco residents and visitors to gather, learn, enjoy entertainment, and exchange ideas and they are seen as a positive contribution to Pasco’s culture and public realm. Large events, those with high risk, and those that substantially alter the use of public space necessitate City services to maintain safety for attendees and to prevent unreasonable inconvenience for those who choose not to attend but are impacted by the event. These regulations are established for the purpose of regulating those events which are intended to draw large numbers of people, involve use of public facilities, or involve use of buildings outside of their established occupancy use to ensure public health and safety. 5.35.020 Permit required. Definitions (1) It shall be unlawful for any person or promoter to initiate, conduct, promote, or participate in any public dance, dance hall, concert, outdoor music festival, parade, demonstration, athletic or competitive event or temporary special sales events on public or private roadways, sidewalks, parks or places within the City until a special events permit therefor has been secured. (2) Special event permits will be required for (but not limited to) the following: Page 127 of 218 (a) Public dance; (b) Dance hall; (c) Concert; (d) Outdoor music festival; (e) Parade; (f) Demonstration; (g) Athletic or competitive event; (h) Temporary special sales event involving one or more unlicensed City of Pasco businesses; (i) Dances, concerts and special sales events that involve one or more unlicensed City of Pasco businesses held at the Trade Recreation and Agricultural Center (TRAC). [Ord. 3822, 2007; Ord. 3764 § 3, 2006; Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.010.] Neighborhood Block Party: A Neighborhood Block Party is a gathering of friends and neighbors on their shared block. With a permit, the closure of one block to vehicular traffic provides a temporary venue for these events, which can include shared meals, communal art projects, or other activities. Road Closure: Road closures temporarily block roads to car traffic through the use of cones and barricades. Two types of road closure permits, Street Festival Permits and Neighborhood Block Party Permits, allow applicants to make use of streets as temporary venues for public gatherings. Street Festival: A Street Festival is the use of the street for events such as markets, athletic events, concerts, or car shows. Security Guard: In this chapter, security guards refer to those who are licensed and state certified. These individuals are trained on fire prevention, evacuation processes, critical incident response, and other skills that equip them to provide assistance at events and in cases of emergencies. Security Personnel: In this chapter, security personnel refer to those who are tasked with monitoring events for safety and security. Security personnel can use de-escalation tactics to reduce conflict and may carry skills such as CPR or Stop the Bleed training. These individuals should be visible and equipped to quickly communicate with event organizers and first responders. Special Event: A Special Event is a general term that refers to a meeting, celebration, or demonstration that gathers a group of people. Page 128 of 218 5.35.030 Exemption to permit requirements. Special Events in Public Space The following events shall be exempt from the special event requirements and application process and payment of permit fee; provided, however, the person or promoter initiating or conducting such event shall be responsible for collecting any applicable vendor(s) fee and payment of applicable admissions tax: (1) Events conducted by public or private elementary, secondary and college-level educational institutions held at educational facilities; (2) Events held at the Trade Recreation and Agricultural Center (TRAC) (Please note: PMC 5.35.020(2)(i) listed above); (3) Private events not open to the public; (4) City sponsored events; (5) Ongoing events either operating under a City permit or; (6) A business-licensed event in a facility designed for the event (e.g., baseball games at the baseball stadium, soccer matches at the City soccer fields, softball at the City softball complex); (7) Other similar events. [Ord. 3822, 2007; Code 1970 § 5.25.015.] Pasco’s City-owned parks and public ways can be utilized as places for gathering, commerce, learning, and celebration. The permit process ensures that the City can provide the services necessary to facilitate events that are safe and successful. If applicants demonstrate successful event management, including adhering to all requirements in 5.35.030(2), they may apply for an ongoing permit for recurring events. (1) Permit Required A Special Event in Public Space Permit is required when an event takes place in a city-owned park or public way AND (a) Is expected to draw 100 or more people at one time; OR (b) Requires a ticket or paid admission; OR (c) Includes a high risk activity such as fireworks, a petting zoo, or bounce house; OR (d) Involves commercial filming or use of drones; OR (e) Alcohol will be served at the event; OR (f) Event proposes to include the closure of a City street per PMC 5.35.040. Page 129 of 218 (2) Event Requirements and Restrictions (a) All events serving alcohol must display appropriate permit from the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board. (b) If food will be prepared and served during the event, event organizers must display appropriate permits from the Benton-Franklin Health District. (c) If the event is providing portable toilets, 5% of the toilet units provided must be accessible in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). (d) Events with 250 or more attendees must provide a properly maintained and fully functioning AED which is visible to the public and available for immediate use. (3) Permit Application Requirements. (a) All event applicants and listed contacts shall be 18 years or older. The applicant shall provide their name, address, and valid identification. (b) Applicant must provide a Site Plan that shows the event location (including street names) as well as the location of any portable toilets, vendor booths, eating areas, first aid location, fire hydrants, fencing, and all major structures. Site Plan should be drawn to scale and include all relevant measurements. (c) Application shall include a Security Assessment Form per PMC 5.35.070. (d) Applicant shall provide proof of broad form commercial general liability coverage (occurrence type trigger) with bodily injury and property damage liability minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence. (e) The application shall include the applicable fee as set forth in PMC 3.35.050. (e) Application shall be submitted no less than 30 days prior to the date of the event. (4) Application Approval (a) Applications shall be reviewed in accordance with PMC 5.35.080 and shall require approval by the Community & Economic Development Department, Police Department, and Parks & Recreation Department. 5.35.040 Definitions. Road Closures. The following definitions shall apply to this chapter: Page 130 of 218 “Athletic, competitive or festival events” means any event to which the members of the public are invited, with or without charge, to be conducted upon the public right-of-way, public parks, places or facilities for the purpose of athletic events, such as but not limited to foot races, walk-a-thons, bicycle races, sponsored walks; mechanical competitions including, but not limited to, auto racing, auto-cross, motor-cross or vehicle racing; and festivals or celebrations, including but not limited to food festivals, craft shows, art shows and special events celebration. “Concert” means any music festival, dance festival, rock festival or similar musical activity to which music is provided by paid or amateur performers or by prerecorded means, and to which members of the public are invited or admitted with or without charge, membership fee or donation. “Dance hall” means any privately owned place in which a public dance is conducted, operated, or maintained or made available on a periodic or reoccurring basis and includes the premises in which the public dance is conducted, operated, or maintained, including but not limited to all public parking areas, hallways, bathrooms, and other adjoining areas on the premises accessible to the public during the dance. “Demonstration” means a gathering or assembly of 50 or more people upon the public right-of-way, public park, place or facility for the purpose of demonstrating, protesting, informing or persuading a political or ideological point of view. “Outdoor music festival” means any concert to be held outdoors or outside of a walled and covered structure for the primary purpose of presenting live or recorded music or other amplified sounds for entertainment. “Parade” means an informal or formal march or procession or movement of a body of people, vehicles or things marshaled in succession upon the public right-of-way or public parks, places or facilities. “Promoter” means any person, group of persons, association, partnership, corporation, or firm engaged in the business of providing to any vendor, directly or indirectly, sales areas within a temporary special event location for the purpose of using such location during the term of a temporary event permit, or sponsor of an athletic, competitive or festival event, concert, outdoor music festival, public dance, demonstration or parade. “Public dance” means any dance held in a dance hall that is open to the public and which permits the entry of any person with or without the payment of an admission fee, membership fee or donation from any of the persons admitted; or any dance not held open to the public, but to which 100 or more people are invited or attend, except for the following: (1) A dance operated, held and sponsored by and for the licensees of premises licensed for dancing pursuant to PMC 5.35.020, provided the dance is in conjunction with the licensee’s regular business; (2) A dance operated, held and sponsored by a fraternal, veteran, service or charitable organization which is generally recognized as such and is registered as a nonprofit organization in the State of Washington, by a bona fide church, or by a political party organization eligible to be on the ballot in Washington State which is held on premises owned or regularly leased by the organization, or which is generally limited to members of Page 131 of 218 the organization when held on premises licensed for dancing pursuant to PMC 5.35.020 not owned or regularly leased by the organization; (3) A dance operated, held, or sponsored by a generally recognized nonprofit organization registered as such in the State of Washington when held on premises licensed for dancing pursuant to PMC 5.35.020 and which is part of a special function of said organization and is not held primarily for the purposes of being a public dance; (4) A dance operated, held or sponsored by an educational institution either in or not in conjunction with a recognized student group which is held on the premises of the institution, attendance to which is restricted to students and members of the educational institution and individual guests thereof. This exception is not applicable to dances open to members of another school not cosponsoring it as a joint activity or open to members of the public. The determination of nonprofit status for organizations seeking exemption under subsections (2) and (3) of this section shall be consistent with the applicable definitions and process contained in Chapter 3.05 PMC. “Sales area” means any stall, booth, stand, space, section, unit or specified floor area within any temporary special event location where goods or services are offered or displayed by a vendor for the purpose of sale, trade, barter, exchange or advertisement. “Temporary special sales event” means the congregation of one or more vendors who rent, lease, purchase or otherwise obtain a temporary sales area for the purpose of selling, bartering, exchanging, trading or displaying goods or services at an event which is open to the public for a period not to exceed 10 consecutive calendar days. “Temporary special sales location” means an area open to the public, wherein one or more vendors locate for the purpose of participating in a temporary special sales event. “Vendor” means any person, association, group, partnership, corporation or firm who exhibits goods or services in a temporary special sales event location for the purpose of selling, bartering, trading, exchanging or advertising such goods or services. [Ord. 3764 § 4, 2006; Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.020.] (1) Intent Temporarily closing roads to vehicular traffic can free up space for many types of gatherings including markets, athletic events, neighborhood block parties, and car shows. The city encourages these uses of public streets and must also ensure that these events do not pose safety risks or cause unreasonable inconvenience for other residents. The City offers two types of permits that allow for the temporary closure of roads to vehicular traffic: Neighborhood Block Party Permits and Street Festival Permits. A Neighborhood Block Party Permit is intended for residential gatherings that bring together friends and neighborhoods on their shared block. These permits are available for events that meet a stricter set of criteria compared to Street Festival Permits. Page 132 of 218 Street Festival Permits are intended for events such as markets, athletic events, concerts, or car shows. They may last more than one calendar day, may be ticketed and closed to the public, and can take place in Commercial and Mixed-use zones. If applicants demonstrate successful event management, including adhering to all applicable event requirements, they may apply for an ongoing permit for recurring events. (2) General Requirements The following requirements apply to all road closures. (a) When road closure will disrupt public transit services, permit will require approval from Ben Franklin Transit (BFT). (b) Event organizers shall procure barricades, traffic cones, or signs based on what is required for their road closure type (see PMC 5.35.050(3)(b) and PMC 5.35.050(4)(b) for specific requirements.) The City does not provide or lend traffic control equipment except for City-sponsored events and closures. (c) All road closures must maintain 20 feet of clearance for emergency vehicle access. Only easily movable items may be placed in this area. (d) An assigned safety monitor must be present at both sides of the block. (3) Neighborhood Block Party (a) Eligibility In order to qualify for a Neighborhood Block Party permit, an event must meet ALL of the following criteria: (i) Closure is limited to 1 street block. (ii) Street is located in a residential zone (any R zones). (iii) Street is “Local,” as designated by the most recent Transportation Master Plan. (iii) Event is limited to 8 hours in length, between 9:00 AM and 12:00 AM, and no more than 1 calendar day. (iv) Event is free and open to the public. (b) Event Requirements and Restrictions (i) Road must be blocked on both sides using Type II barricades or garbage/recycling bins measuring two feet wide at a minimum. Barricades must be placed 6 feet apart or less, with rope or other material draped between them. Page 133 of 218 (c) Permit Application Requirements. (i) Applicant must be 18 years or old and a resident of the block they are proposed to temporarily close. (ii) Applicant shall provide their name, address, and valid identification. (iii) Applicant shall provide a description of activities that will take place during the event. (vi) Applicant shall provide a site plan showing proposed road closure and cross streets (labeled), with 20’ of emergency access indicated. If the width of the road cannot accommodate a 20’ emergency access, relief may be granted, in limited circumstances, by the Fire Marshal and Fire Chief provided all life safety elements can be met. Plan should also indicate locations of Type II barricades and/or waste bins. (vii) Application shall be submitted no less than 30 days prior to the date of the event. (d) Permit Approval Neighborhood Block Party Permits shall be reviewed in accordance with PMC 5.35.080 and shall require approval by the Community & Economic Development Department, Police Department, Public Works, and City Engineer. (4) Street Festival Permit (a) Eligibility Street closure applications that do not meet the criteria for a Neighborhood Block Party fall under the umbrella of Street Festival. (b) Restrictions and Requirements (i) Road must be blocked on both sides using Type III barricades placed 6 feet apart or less, with rope or another material draped between them. See the “Street Festival Template” for an example of the correct configuration. (c) Application Requirements Street Festival permits shall be submitted as a supplement to a Special Event in Public Space Permit, no less than 30 days prior to the date of the event. In addition to the application requirements for a Special Event in Public Space Permit, Street Festival applicants shall provide: (i) Site Plan (drawn to scale) showing proposed road closure and cross streets, including length and width of street area to be closed. Twenty feet of emergency access across the whole closure length should also be indicated on the Site Plan. These items can be indicated Page 134 of 218 on the same Site Plan that is submitted for the Special Events in Public Space Permit, or separately. (ii) Traffic Control Plan showing locations of Type III barricades and signage in accordance with the most current version of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) as adopted by the State of Washington. Traffic Control Plan can be included on the Site Plan, or separately. (iii) Applications must include the applicable fee as set forth in PMC 3.35.050. (d) Application Approval Street Festival Permits shall be reviewed in accordance with PMC 5.35.080 and shall require approval by the Community & Economic Development Department, Police Department, Public Works, and City Engineer. 5.35.050 Application. Special Assemblies. A special events permit for all events covered by this chapter, including demonstrations or parades, may be obtained from the City upon application made in writing at least 30 days prior to the date on which the event is to be held, upon application forms furnished by the City. The application form shall include but not be limited to the following information: (1) Name, age, residence or mailing address of person making the application. If the application is made by a partnership, corporation or association, the application must be signed by the president or other authorized officer thereof, and must contain the name and addresses of the officers, managers, or partners of the entity. (2) A statement of the kind, character or type of event, which the applicant proposes to conduct, operate or carry on. Give a general description of the event including the names of any performers, specific plans for the conduct of the event, etc. (3) The address(es) and description(s) of the place(s) where the proposed event is to be conducted, operated or carried on and the route of travel if the event includes a parade, or utilizes multiple facilities. If the place or the event is not a public place, the owner of the premises must provide written consent for the site to be used for the proposed event. (4) The date(s) and hours during which said event is to be conducted. Include planned or estimated times for event setup and takedown, as applicable. (5) An estimate of the number of participants, spectators, customers or other persons expected to attend said event for each day it is conducted. Page 135 of 218 (6) A plat or map showing the location of the special event, including any route of travel and the arrangement of necessary facilities, including parking, egress and ingress, fire lanes, and such other facilities as may be necessary for the safe accomplishment of the event. (7) For events where amplification equipment is proposed to be used, the applicant shall be required to sign a statement acknowledging receipt of a copy of the City’s noise control regulations (Chapter 9.130 PMC) and stating applicant’s intent to abide by all applicable provisions thereof. (8) For events where admission is charged, the applicant shall furnish the name and address of the individual responsible for the collection and payment of the admission tax and the owner, lessee or custodian of the premises, who shall be jointly and severally liable to the City for collection and remittance of such tax as described in PMC 3.05.090, Admissions tax – Remittance of tax. [Ord. 3764 § 5, 2006; Ord. 3592 § 1, 2002; Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.030.] Special assembly permits are required when events involve the use of temporary structures and/or will result in changes to occupancy use. The intent is to mitigate fire and other risks associated with large crowds, dense gatherings, use of fire or heating facilities, and temporary structures. If applicants demonstrate successful event management, including adhering to all applicable event requirements, they may apply for an ongoing permit for recurring events. (1) Permit Required A Special Assembly Permit is required when an event is open to the public or a fee is charged for entry, AND; (a) Event will utilize temporary tents or membrane structures 400 square feet or more in size or an aggregate area of multiple tents of 700 square feet; OR (b) Event includes amusement rides or inflatable structures/rides; OR (c) Event includes temporary stages, bleachers, or other structures; OR (d) Event takes place in an unsprinklered building and results in a change in occupancy use that requires sprinklers. For example, events in A2 Occupancies that use 350 square feet or more of space primarily for standing, dancing, and viewing performance, thereby triggering the nightclub definition under RCW 19.27.510. (2) Event Requirements and Restrictions (a) Events that trigger sprinkler requirements in unsprinklered buildings require designated fire watch staff. The Fire Marshal will advise on protocol. (3) Permit Application Requirements (a) The permit applicant shall provide their name, address, and valid identification. Page 136 of 218 (b) Site Plan (drawn to scale) showing event location, dimensions of event space, and locations of structures and activity areas. (c) Applications must include the applicable fee as set forth in PMC 3.35.050. (d) Application shall be submitted no less than 30 days prior to the date of the event. (4) Application review: Permits shall be reviewed in accordance with PMC 5.35.080 and shall require approval by the Community & Economic Development Department and Police Department. 5.35.060 Temporary special sales event. Temporary Sales. (1) In addition to the application stated in PMC 5.35.050, the applicant for temporary special sales events shall include: (a) A list of the total number of vendors participating at the temporary special sales event for which the permit is sought. The list shall include the vendor’s name, address and business phone number, together with a general description of the goods and/or services offered by each vendor. (2) Each permit issued under this section shall be limited to the number of days approved for operation of the temporary special sales event for which the permit is issued. No permit shall be effective for more than 10 consecutive calendar days. [Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.035.] Temporary Sales Permits allow one or more vendors to conduct sales without a Pasco Business License for a limited time. This can apply to many event types, such as a Farmers Market held in a City-owned park, a trade show held in a privately owned building, or the temporary use of a private parking lot by a single vendor. If applicants demonstrate successful event management, including adhering to all applicable event requirements, they may apply for an ongoing permit for recurring temporary sales. (1) Permit Required A Temporary Sales Permit is required when one or more vendors will be selling goods without a Pasco Business License. (2) Event Requirements and Restrictions (a) Each permit issued under this section shall be limited to the number of days approved for operation of the temporary special sales event for which the permit is issued. No permit shall be effective for more than 10 consecutive calendar days. Page 137 of 218 (b) Sales permitted to use city-owned sidewalks or other public ways must adhere to the standards set forth in 5.75.100 Mobile vendor standards. (3) Application Requirements (a) Name, address, and valid identification for the permit applicant. (b) Address of where sale is to take place. (c) List of vendors participating as well as a general description of goods being sold. (d) Days and hours the event will take place. (e) If sales event proposes use of public sidewalk, application shall also include a site plan. Site plan (drawn to scale) shall show sale location including cross streets, indicate size of vending space, and show where the vending space will be positioned on the sidewalk. (f) Applications must include the applicable fee as set forth in PMC 3.35.050. (g) Application shall be submitted no less than 30 days prior to the date of the event. (4) Application Review: Permits shall be reviewed in accordance with PMC 5.35.080 and shall require approval by the Community & Economic Development Department. 5.35.070 Dance halls. Security Assessment. In addition to the application as required in PMC 5.35.050, the applicant for dance hall operation shall submit: (1) A statement that the premises are in compliance with all City laws, including but not limited to building, zoning, planning and fire codes, together with attached documentation of an inspection of the premises conducted not more than 60 days prior to the date of application. (2) A statement that the applicant will, in the conduct and operation of the dance hall, comply with all City laws, including but not limited to the noise control ordinance. (3) A security plan identifying the method and qualification for providing one security officer for each 100 persons upon the premises. (4) Description of other food, beverage, or services provided on the premises with copies of necessary permits and licenses. (5) A statement identifying the individual entity liable for the collection and payment of the City admission tax. Page 138 of 218 (6) The City shall perform a criminal history check in accordance with PMC 5.65.050 for all applicants seeking a permit under this chapter. [Ord. 4022, 2011; Ord. 3524, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.040.] Providing proper security staff can help mitigate the risks inherent to gathering groups of people in public space. For large and high-risk events, licensed and state-certified security guards may be necessary. For lower risk events, staff or volunteers may be assigned to monitor the event, deescalate situations when necessary, and contact appropriate help in the case of a medical or other emergency. Applicants for Special Events in Public Space Permits, Street Festivals, and Special Assemblies shall complete a Security Assessment Form to estimate the type and number of security personnel they will need. The Chief of Police shall have the final determination on security needs. (1) Event Risk Scoring Matrix The matrix below shall be used to approximate the risk level associated with the proposed event. Applicants shall total up points based on their proposed event to yield a total score. Table: Event Risk Factor Scoring Matrix Page 139 of 218 (2) Risk Scoring Guide Using the table below, applicants can use their total score to determine their recommended security level based on their event’s score: Table: Security Level Assessment (3) Security Requirements Using the table below, applicants can estimate security personnel needed for the event based on their assessed risk level. On the Security Assessment Form, applicants will outline their proposed security plan based on their assessed risk level. The Police Department will review and approve this plan or provide guidance for an alternative security plan. Note: event size describes the estimated maximum number of people that will be present at the same time throughout the duration of the event. Table: Estimated Security Requirement Page 140 of 218 5.35.080 Auction sales. Procedure for Application Approval. (1) All auction sales shall pay a fee for a term of up to three consecutive days; provided, however, that the fee requirements of this subsection shall not be applicable to persons, firms or corporations having established places of business in the City and having valid business licenses issued by the City, who wish to hold an auction for the purpose of disposing of excess inventory, damaged goods, or for promotion; provided, however, that any auction conducted under this provision shall not exceed one day in length and the person, firm or corporation holding such auction shall, as a condition precedent, file written notice with the City Clerk of the date, time, place and nature of the goods to be auctioned and the reasons for conducting the auction. Notice as required herein shall be filed with the City representative at least 30 days prior to the date the auction is to be held; and provided further, that no person, firm or corporation shall be entitled to hold more than one auction each calendar year under this provision without being required to pay the fee. This provision shall not apply in the following cases: (a) Judicial sales held pursuant to an order of the court; or (b) Nonjudicial sales held under the authority of and pursuant to a federal or state statute; or (c) An auction conducted by or on behalf of a political organization or a charitable corporation or association if the person conducting the sale receives no compensation; or (d) An auction conducted by or under the direction of a public authority; or (e) Wholesale auctions and stockyard auctions, which will be required to pay the regular license fee. (2) All auction sales to which the above license fee provision applies shall be required to submit with their license application a legible photocopy of the auctioneer’s current certificate of registration issued by the Page 141 of 218 Washington State Department of Licensing and the auction company’s certificate of registration issued by the Washington State Department of Licensing. (3) Auction sales shall be required to comply with the special events provisions as set forth in this chapter. [Ord. 4372 § 31, 2017; Ord. 3560 § 6, 2002; Ord. 2831 § 1, 1991; Code 1970 § 5.25.045.] (1) Applications shall be made to the Community & Economic Development Department, who may issue a permit, deny a permit, or set conditions, limitations or restrictions that must be met before a permit may be granted. The City shall process a complete application and respond to the applicant within two weeks of submittal. (2) The denial of any permit or the imposition of any conditions, limitations or restrictions incident to the granting of a permit shall be based solely upon those requirements reasonably necessary to protect the peace, health, safety and welfare of those both participating in the event and others using the public facilities. No permit shall be granted, conditioned or denied based upon the content of the applicant’s stated purpose, expression of lawful speech because of race, creed, color, national origin, families with children, sex, marital status, age, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a disabled person. (3) If conditions are imposed, the applicant shall furnish proof that all conditions have been met before any permit may be issued. (4) The permit shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the premises where the event is conducted. No permit issued pursuant to this chapter shall be transferable to any entity or person other than applicant, or removed to another location, date or time than that stated on the application. 5.35.090 Public dance. Appeal. Any public dance, other than those conducted on the premises of a dance hall, and in addition to the application provided in PMC 5.35.050, shall: (1) Identify the date and time of the conduct of the public dance. A permit shall be required for each date and time the public dance is to be conducted and shall only be good for the place, date and time specified in the permit. (2) A security plan identifying the method and qualification for providing one security officer for each 100 persons upon the premises. (3) Description of other licensed food, beverage, or services provided on the premises. (4) A statement identifying the individual liable for the collection and payment of the City admission tax. Page 142 of 218 (5) The City shall perform a criminal history check in accordance with PMC 5.65.050 for all applicants seeking a permit under this chapter. [Ord. 4022, 2011; Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.050.] Any person aggrieved by the issuance, denial, or conditions imposed upon the permit may seek review of the determination by the City Manager within five days of the determination. At such hearing, the applicant shall have the burden of proof showing that the determination was arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the requirements of this chapter. The determination of the City Manager shall be final unless appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the determination. 5.35.100 Carnivals and circuses. Revocation of Permit. (1) License Required. It shall be unlawful for a carnival or circus, as defined in subsection (2) of this section, to engage in business within the City of Pasco without first having obtained a business license. (2) Definitions. The following terms and definitions shall be used in the administration of this chapter: “Carnival” shall mean a business activity featuring an assemblage of mechanical rides for the enjoyment, amusement, entertainment, merriment or pastime of the patrons thereof, and usually but not necessarily offers patrons in addition to the rides food and beverage services, as well as games involving throwing, pitching or shooting skills. “Circus” shall mean any institution whose general occupation is that of exhibiting wild animals, feats of horsemanship, animal stunts and acrobatic or aquatic sports, to which a fee is charged for admission. (3) Application. Any person, firm, or corporation desiring to secure a license to operate a carnival or circus shall make application to the City on forms provided by the City. Such application shall provide: (a) The name or names and address of the applicant; (b) The location of the proposed carnival or circus; (c) Nature of the business activity; (d) Each license application for a carnival or circus shall be accompanied with the following information to establish compliance with applicable codes: (i) The number of food vending conveyances, if any, to be utilized in conjunction with the proposed business activity; (ii) Proof of insurance as required by subsection (8) of this section; Page 143 of 218 (iii) Proof of a valid electrical permit from the Department of Labor and Industries; (iv) A statement explaining the method of trash and litter disposal being proposed; (v) A notarized written authorization from the owners of the property so noted on the application; (vi) A drawing of a scale not greater than 50 feet per inch and not less than 10 feet per inch, which drawing shall depict the following information: (A) The portion of the property to be occupied by the business; (B) The portion of the property to be used for automobile parking and the number of automobiles accommodated in said area; (C) The location of driveways providing ingress and egress to the property; (D) The location of existing buildings and structures located on the property noting the use of each building or structure so identified. (4) Investigation and Determination. Upon receipt of such application, the City Clerk shall cause such investigation of such person’s or persons’ business responsibility to be made as is deemed necessary for protection of the public good and shall refer the application to the Community Development and Fire Departments for determination as to compliance with applicable codes. Criminal history checks shall be performed in accordance with PMC 5.65.050. An application shall be denied by the City Clerk upon written findings that the applicant’s business responsibility is unsatisfactory or that the proposed business activity will violate any applicable law, rule or regulation. Otherwise, upon submittal of the required application and information and following collection of fees and receipt of approvals from applicable City departments, the Health District (if applicable) and the Department of Labor and Industries, the City Clerk shall issue the license. (5) Appeals. Any person aggrieved by the denial of an application for a license or by the revocation of a license as provided for in this chapter shall have the right to appeal to the City Council. Such appeal shall be taken by filing with the City Clerk within 14 calendar days after the notice of decision has been mailed, by certified mail, to the applicant’s or licensee’s last known address, a written statement setting forth the grounds for the appeal. The Council shall set the time and place for hearing on such appeal, and notice of such hearing shall be given by certified mail or personal service to the appellant at least five calendar days prior to the date fixed for such hearing. (6) Standards. All carnivals and circuses licensed under this chapter shall conform to the following standards: (a) No carnival or circus shall be licensed for a location in a residential zoning district or office district, as defined in PMC Title 25, excepting Edgar Brown Stadium; Page 144 of 218 (b) No carnival or circus shall be located within 500 feet of a residential zoning district as defined in PMC Title 25; (c) No carnival or circus activity shall locate or operate in such a manner as to interfere with traffic circulation, emergency services or other normal City operations; (d) No carnival or circus shall be located within 50 feet of flammable combustible liquid or gas storage and dispensing structures; (e) Provisions must be made for the control of dust and litter; (f) Provisions for off-street parking on the site and a reasonable and safe means of ingress/egress must be shown; (g) All amusement rides shall be set back from all public rights-of-way and electrical distribution lines a distance equal to the height of the amusement ride; (h) All signs and equipment must be removed and the premises shall be free of all trash, litter and debris within three days after the termination of the use. (7) License Fee. Every circus and carnival shall pay a license fee as set forth in Chapter 3.35 PMC for the first day and an additional fee for each and every day after the first day of operation. All food booths require a separate food handler’s license and per Chapter 5.50 PMC. Each licensee shall pay the regular admission tax on all admission tickets or admissions for which a charge is made. The license fee is paid in advance for each day said carnival or circus proposes to operate within the City, except that a no fee license to qualifying nonprofit organizations may be issued under PMC 5.05.170. (8) Insurance. Before any license shall be granted, the applicant must present certificates of insurance with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this section. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The City reserves the right to require complete certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. The applicant shall maintain broad form commercial general liability coverage (occurrence type trigger) with bodily injury and property damage liability minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence. (9) Penalty. It is unlawful for any person to violate any terms of this chapter. Every person found in violation of any terms of this chapter shall be punished by fine of not more than $300.00. [Ord. 4372 § 32, 2017; Ord. 4022, 2011; Ord. 3560 § 15, 2002; Ord. 3190 § 6, 1996; Ord. 2850 § 1, 1991; Code 1970 § 5.25.055.] Notwithstanding any of the provisions of this chapter, the City may issue an emergency order revoking a permit upon a failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit, or when the Chief of Police, the Fire Chief, or the Community & Economic Development Director or designee believes that such action is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. The emergency order shall set forth the grounds upon which it is based, including a statement of facts constituting the emergency necessitating such action. The emergency order shall be effective immediately upon issuance and Page 145 of 218 service, whether written or verbal, upon the permittee and participants. Failure to comply with any conditions of approval or representations made within the application documents shall be grounds for immediate revocation of the permit. 5.35.110 Concerts, outdoor music festivals and athletic or competitive events. (1) In addition to the application required in PMC 5.35.050, the applicant for a concert, outdoor music festival, athletic or competitive event shall submit an event facility plan, which shall include the following: (a) The estimated number of customers, spectators or participants expected to attend, and the total number of tickets available for sale. The number of tickets actually sold or distributed shall be provided to public safety officials 24 hours before the event. A statement identifying the individual/entity liable for the collection and payment of the City admissions tax. (b) A full and detailed outline of all show requirements, including stage, lighting, personnel, bleacher and seating requirements, canopies, power and cable needs and locations, and illumination. A drawing of the event site shall be included showing the arrangement of the above facilities. (c) A plan showing the proposed location and description of the methods of providing for the following: (i) Security and fire protection; (ii) Water supplies and facilities; (iii) Food supplies and facilities; (iv) Sanitary facilities; (v) Medical facilities and services, including emergency medical personnel and emergency medical transport services available; (vi) A feasible plan for parking; (vii) Vehicle access and on-site traffic control. (d) Contingent plans for numbers of spectators in excess of the estimate. (e) Provisions for cleanup of the premises and removal of rubbish. (f) Proof of premises and liability insurance in such amount and coverage as recommended by the City’s insurance provider. Page 146 of 218 (2) Security plan including, but not limited to the following: (a) The name of the organization providing security, including the number of security officers, consisting of not less than one officer for every 100 anticipated persons in attendance. The proposed security organization must be approved by the Chief of Police. (b) Coordination with the City Police Department. (c) Provisions for control of spectators in excess of the estimated number of facility capacities and emergency vehicle access. (3) A statement identifying the individual entity liable for the collection and payment of the City admission tax. [Ord. 3764 § 6, 2006; Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.060.] 5.35.120 Outdoor music festival – Additional requirements. In addition to the requirements in PMC 5.35.050 and 5.35.110, the applicant for an outdoor music festival shall provide the information required by RCW 70.108.040, which includes: (1) The name of the person or other legal entity on behalf of whom said application is made; provided, that a natural person applying for such permit shall be 18 years of age or older. (2) A financial statement of the applicant (except where the applicant is a qualified political, religious, charitable or nonprofit organization). (3) The nature of the business organization of the applicant. (4) Names and addresses of all individuals or other entities having a 10 percent or more proprietary interest in the festival. (5) The principal place of business of applicant. (6) A legal description of the land to be occupied, and the name and address of the owner thereof, together with a document showing the consent of said owner to the issuance of a permit, if the land be owned by a person other than the applicant. (7) The schedule of performances and programs. (8) Names and addresses of any and all vendors, peddlers or tradesmen who will conduct a business on the festival premises. All vendors selling or distributing food items to the public must have been approved by, and received a health permit from, the local health department as necessary. (9) Written confirmation from the local health officer that he or she has reviewed and approved plans for site and development in accordance with rules, regulations and standards adopted by the State Board of Health. Page 147 of 218 Such rules and regulations shall include criteria as to the following and such other matters as the State Board of Health deems necessary to protect the public’s health: (a) Submission of plans; (b) Site; (c) Insect and rodent control; (d) Shelter; (e) Dust control; (f) Lighting; (g) Emergency air evacuation; (h) Attendant physicians; (i) Communication systems; and (j) If it is proposed or expected that spectators or participants will remain at night, or overnight, arrangements for illuminating the premises and for camping or for similar facilities. (10) A written confirmation from the appropriate law enforcement agency from the area where the outdoor music festival is to take place, showing that traffic control and crowd protection policing have been contracted for or otherwise provided by the applicant meeting the following conditions: (a) One person for each 200 persons reasonably expected to be in attendance at any time during the event for purposes of traffic and crowd control. Approved security personnel shall be present on site for the two hours preceding and two hours after the scheduled event times. (b) The names and addresses of all traffic and crowd control personnel shall be provided to the appropriate law enforcement authority; provided, that not less than 20 percent of the traffic and crowd control personnel shall be commissioned police officers or deputy sheriffs. (c) During the hours that the festival site shall be open to the public, there shall be at least one regularly commissioned police officer employed by the jurisdiction wherein the festival site is located for every 1,000 persons in attendance and said officer shall be on duty within the confines of the actual outdoor music festival site. The applicant shall pay the full cost of said officer to the City in advance of the event. (d) All law enforcement personnel shall be charged with enforcing the provisions of this chapter and all existing statutes, ordinances and regulations. Page 148 of 218 (11) A written confirmation from the appropriate law enforcement authority that sufficient access roads are available for ingress and egress to the parking areas of the outdoor music festival site and that parking areas are available on the actual site of the festival or immediately adjacent thereto which are capable of accommodating one auto for every four persons in estimated attendance at the outdoor music festival site. (12) A written confirmation from the Department of Natural Resources, where applicable, and the Director of Community Services, through the Fire Chief, that all fire prevention requirements have been complied with. (13) A written statement of the applicant that all state and local law enforcement officers, fire control officers and other necessary governmental personnel shall have free access to the site of the outdoor music festival. (14) A statement that the applicant will abide by the provisions of this chapter. (15) The verification of the applicant warranting the truth of the matters as set forth in the application to the best of the applicant’s knowledge, under the penalty of perjury. [Ord. 3569 § 5, 2002; Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.065.] 5.35.130 Permit fee. (1) The application provided under this chapter shall be accompanied by the payment of a permit fee as set forth in Chapter 3.35 PMC for each of the following categories: (a) Auctions; (b) Carnivals and circuses; (c) Concerts, athletic and competitive events and festivals; (d) Dance hall. Base permit fee as provided in PMC 5.05.130 and 5.05.140 is applicable; (e) Demonstrations, parades, public dances; (f) Outdoor music festivals; (g) Temporary Special Sales Events. The permit fee shall be calculated per vendor, except for businesses already holding a current city business license. In no event shall a total business license for such an event exceed the maximum fee set forth in Chapter 3.35 PMC for temporary sales events. The fee shall be paid by the promoter for each vendor who intends to be included under the promoter’s temporary special sales event permit and shall be remitted by the promoter to the City three days prior to commencement of the temporary special sales event. The promoter shall be personally responsible for all sums collected, or any sum which should have been collected from a vendor. (2) In the event the City is to provide either all or a portion of the crowd or traffic control, in addition to the fee provided above, an additional fee in the amount to be determined by the Chief of Police, which will be Page 149 of 218 calculated upon the number of police officers that must be present to provide adequate public safety, multiplied by the current overtime hourly rate paid for the highest patrolman classification in effect at the time of the event for the period of time for which traffic and/or crowd control will be necessary. (3) The permit fee (other than the City’s costs for crowd and/or traffic control) may be waived by the City Council upon application sponsored by a bona fide nonprofit corporation, charity, religious or political organization. No fee shall be imposed when prohibited by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution or the Washington Constitution. Political or religious activity intended primarily for the communication or expression of ideas shall be presumed to be a constitutionally protected event. Factors that may be considered in evaluating whether or not the fee applies include: the nature of the event; the extent to which the fee creates an unreasonable burden upon constitutionally protected activities; the extent of commercial activity, such as the sales of goods, food, and services; product advertising or promotion, or other business participation in the event; the use or application of any funds raised in the conduct of previous events sponsored by the same promoter. (4) Bond. The City may require the posting of a bond of sufficient amount to insure the satisfactory compliance with the conditions of permit issuance, including the costs of cleanup and repairs. (5) Nothing herein shall relieve any promoter or applicant from complying with all other required federal, state, and local regulations, fees and licensing requirements. (6) The permit fee shall be paid prior to the event and shall not be refundable. [Ord. 4372 § 33, 2017; Ord. 3560 § 22, 2002; Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.070.] 5.35.140 Procedure for application approval. (1) Applications shall be made to the City Clerk. All applications for permits issued under this chapter shall be made no less than 30 days prior to the scheduled event, except in the case of outdoor music festivals, which shall be submitted not less than 90 days prior to the first scheduled day of the event. The completed application and required documents shall be circulated by the City Clerk for review and recommendation to the Chief of Police, the Fire Chief, and the Community Services Director. Based upon the recommendation of the said department heads, the City Clerk may issue a permit, deny a permit, or set conditions, limitations or restrictions that must be met before a permit may be granted. The City shall timely process a complete application and promptly respond to the applicant. (2) The denial of any permit or the imposition of any conditions, limitations or restrictions incident to the granting of a permit shall be based solely upon those requirements reasonably necessary to protect the peace, health, safety and welfare of those both participating in the event and others using the public facilities. No permit shall be granted, conditioned or denied based upon the content of the applicant’s stated purpose, expression of lawful speech because of race, creed, color, national origin, families with children, sex, marital Page 150 of 218 status, age, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a disabled person. (3) If conditions are imposed, the applicant shall furnish proof that all conditions have been met before any permit may be issued. (4) The permit shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the premises where the event is conducted. No permit issued pursuant to this chapter shall be transferable to any entity or person other than applicant, or removed to another location, date or time than that stated on the application. [Ord. 3560 § 23, 2002; Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.080.] 5.35.150 Appeal. Any person aggrieved by the issuance, denial, or conditions imposed upon the permit may seek review of the determination by the City Manager within five days of the determination. At such hearing, the applicant shall have the burden of proof showing that the determination was arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the requirements of this chapter. The determination of the City Manager shall be final unless appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the City Manager’s determination. [Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.090.] 5.35.160 Revocation of permit. Notwithstanding any of the provisions of this chapter, the City may issue an emergency order revoking a permit upon a failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit, or when the Chief of Police, the Fire Chief, or the City Manager believes that such action is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. The emergency order shall set forth the grounds upon which it is based, including a statement of facts constituting the emergency necessitating such action. The emergency order shall be effective immediately upon issuance and service, whether written or verbal, upon the permittee and participants. Failure to comply with any conditions of approval or representations made within the application documents shall be grounds for immediate revocation of the permit. [Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.100.] 5.35.170 Crowd and traffic control. (1) In reviewing each application, the Police Chief shall determine the minimum number of police officers and the number of hours for each officer to be in attendance at the event for the purpose of providing crowd and traffic control. Page 151 of 218 (2) At the applicant’s request, the Police Department shall determine the minimum number of private security officers and the number of hours for each officer to be in attendance at the event for the purpose of providing traffic and crowd control. This shall be in lieu of the requirement of the City’s police officers. The applicant may request a computation of the number of City police officers and their hours in combination with the number of private security officers and their hours in lieu of having security provided entirely by the City Police Department or entirely by private security officers. (3) The number, duties, and gender of police or security officers that may be required by the Police Department for approval shall be based upon the following: (a) The type of event and the estimated attendance; (b) The design and location of the premises; (c) The past history of disorder, criminal events and demand for safety services associated with prior events held by the applicant, the type of event, or the premises in which it is located; (d) The past record of the private security agency providing crowd and traffic control for such events; and (e) The physical abilities and training of the police officers or private security officers assigned to the event. (4) Police and fire officials shall be provided necessary access to the event premises. Failure to allow access shall be grounds for permit revocation. [Ord. 3524 § 4, 2001; Code 1970 § 5.25.110.] 5.35.180 Street and intersection closures. (1) Each application for a special events permit which includes a request for a closure (or partial closure) of a street or intersection shall include the following: (a) Indemnity. The applicant shall be required to sign a statement that he or she shall defend, indemnify and otherwise hold harmless the City of Pasco, its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims or liability arising from the City’s grant of permission for or the actual conduct of the special event associated with, and including, such street closure. (b) Insurance. The applicant shall provide evidence of liability insurance coverage, for review by the City’s Risk Manager, with the City of Pasco, its officers, employees and agents named as additional insured parties and offering death, personal injury and property damage liability in an amount not less than $1,000,000. (c) Notice. The applicant shall provide for payment of one newspaper publication and posting, at each end of the to be closed portion of the street and at all intersecting streets, of the notice of street Page 152 of 218 closure (for closures of duration in excess of 12 hours) pursuant to RCW 47.48.020; or for closures of less than 12 hours, posting of such notice, posting only as outlined above. (d) Traffic Control Plan and Devices. The applicant shall provide a plan and such barricades, traffic cones or signs, in conformance with the most current version of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) as adopted by the State of Washington and approved by the City Engineer, as are necessary to accomplish the proposed closure. The City does not provide or lend traffic control equipment except for City-sponsored events and closures. (e) Review Fee. A review fee, which shall be in addition to any special event fee, and as set forth in Chapter 3.35 PMC, shall be required with each application for closure of a street or intersection. The fee shall be nonrefundable, regardless of whether the application is approved or denied. (2) Each street closure request contained within an application for special event shall be reviewed by a committee consisting of the City Engineer (or designee), the Police Chief (or designee) and the City Fire Chief (or designee). The committee shall determine if requested street or intersection closures will be allowed, together with any additional requirements for traffic flow, public safety, access or public notice. Any appeal of the decision of the committee may be made to the City Manager pursuant to PMC 5.35.150. (3) The committee shall approve an application for a street or intersection closure which satisfies the requirements set out in subsection (1) of this section, together with such other requirements as the committee may impose, pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, unless it finds one or more of the following conditions, in which case the application shall be denied: (a) That the closure is likely to unreasonably interfere with vehicle or pedestrian traffic flow; or (b) That the closure is likely to create an unmitigatable danger to vehicular or pedestrian traffic; or (c) That the closure will cause irrevocable interference with previously approved and/or scheduled construction, maintenance or other activities; or (d) That the closure will seriously inconvenience the general public’s use of public property, services or facilities; or (e) That there is not sufficient public safety personnel or other necessary city staff to accommodate the closure so that it may occur in a reasonably safe manner; or (f) That the closure would endanger public safety or health; or (g) That the closure would be likely to cause unreasonable damage to public properties or facilities; or (h) That the closure is not necessary to accommodate an event or activity sponsored by a public entity or available to the general public for the period of the closure. [Ord. 4074, 2012; Code 1970 § 5.25.115.] Page 153 of 218 Section 2. Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 5.52 Parklets and Public Space Cafes is amended as follows: Chapter 5.52 PARKLETS, AND PUBLIC SPACE CAFÉS, AND SIDEWALK DISPLAYS Sections: 5.52.010 Purpose and intent. 5.52.020 Permit required. 5.52.030 Definitions. 5.52.040 Eligibility. 5.52.050 Terms and conditions. 5.52.060 Design standards. 5.52.070 Conversion of parking spaces for a public space café. 5.52.080 Application. 5.52.090 Sidewalk Displays Section 3. Pasco Municipal Code 5.52.030 is amended as follows: 5.52.030 Definitions. “Parklet” means the use of the sidewalk, planting strip, curb space, alley, or parking space by the City as a temporary or semipermanent public space. “Pedestrian clear zone” means an area of the sidewalk reserved for pedestrians and free of elements such as street furniture, planters, fire hydrants, and street trees. “Public space café” means the use of the sidewalk, planting strip, curb space, alley, or parking space by an adjacent restaurant, café, or bar into a temporary or semipermanent area for use by patrons. “Sidewalk Display” means the use of the sidewalk, planting strip, curb space, or alley by an adjacent retail establishment for display of merchandise. Note: The photos below are examples of public space uses and are not intended to serve as regulations or standards as part of this code. Page 154 of 218 Figure 5.52.030.01. A public space café using sidewalk space adjacent to the business frontage to provide additional seating for customers. Figure 5.52.030.02. A public space café positioned between the sidewalk and the curb takes advantage of street trees to provide dappled shade to customers. Figure 5.52.030.03. Parking spaces converted into a public space café using a platform to meet curb grade. Page 155 of 218 Figure 5.52.030.04. A parklet design turns parking spaces into a public area with swings and tables. Figure 5.52.030.05. A nursery creates a sidewalk display using potted plants. Figure 5.52.030.06. Shoppers browse through clothing racks displayed in front of a main street retail store. Section 4. Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 5.52.090 is amended as follows: Page 156 of 218 5.52.090 Sidewalk Displays. Sidewalk displays provide a way for retail establishments to creatively display merchandise for view by passersby by utilizing right-of-way space. Like Public Space Cafés, Sidewalk Displays add interest to the pedestrian experience, while also providing ways for small businesses to attract customers. Sidewalk Displays must not interfere with pedestrian movement or other functions of the public way. (1) Permit Required (a) No person shall operate a sidewalk display in the public place without obtaining a sidewalk display permit. (c) A sidewalk display permit expires if: the business changes ownership or the business vacates the premises, except when a permit transfer is approved by the Community and Economic Development Department; the sidewalk display permit duration expires; or sidewalk display permit fees are not paid. (c) All public space café permits are of a temporary nature and vest no permanent rights. The Community and Economic Development Department may suspend any public space café permit for transportation mobility or public safety purposes. (2) Eligibility To be eligible for a Sidewalk Display, businesses must have building frontage in Pasco on a street with a speed limit of 30 mph or less (3) Requirements (a) Sidewalk Displays are allowed on sidewalks, parking spaces, alley ways or other public spaces abutting the eligible business’s property. (b) Sidewalk Displays shall only include merchandise for sale and display materials such as clothing racks. Additional permitted items include chairs or benches. (c) The placement of a Sidewalk Display shall not obstruct vehicular traffic or the use of any crosswalk, wheelchair ramp, bus, or taxi zone (d) Use of sidewalks shall not reduce pedestrian clear zone to less than three feet. (e) A setback of five feet or greater from curb ramps, traffic signs, utility poles, fire hydrants, bike racks, and other street fixtures is required. (f) A setback of three feet or greater from the front of the curb is required wherever a display abuts a parking lane. Page 157 of 218 (g) A setback of 10 feet or greater from the corner curb radius area is required. Section 5. Pasco Municipal Code 5.75.040 is amended as follows: 5.75.040 Exemptions. The provisions of this chapter shall not be construed to apply to the following: (1) The following shall not be required to obtain a mobile vending permit: (a) Persons selling only fruits, vegetables, berries, eggs or any farm produce or edibles raised, gathered, produced or manufactured by such persons in the State of Washington per RCW 36.71.090. (b) Persons selling only trees used for the celebration of the Christmas season. [Ord. 4722 § 3, 2024; Ord. 2826 § 1, 1991; Code 1970 § 5.10A.030. Formerly 5.75.030.] (2) The above described vendors shall adhere to the requirements set forth in 5.75.100(1). Section 6. Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 5.90 Rummage and Yard Sales is amended as follows: Chapter 5.90 RUMMAGE AND YARD SALES Sections: 5.90.010 Definitions. 5.90.020 Yard sales. 5.90.030 Rummage sales. 5.90.040 Sales in hospitals or schools. 5.90.050 Violations. 5.90.010 Definitions. “Nonprofit organization” includes but is not limited to fraternal organizations, hobby societies, educational societies, historical societies, museums, hospital auxiliary groups, churches, church auxiliary organizations, student groups and parent-teacher organizations. Page 158 of 218 “Rummage sale” means a rummage sale, white elephant sale, auction sale or any similar sale of merchandise by a nonprofit organization when the proceeds of such sale are intended to be used in a community service, child or youth activity, charitable or other welfare work. “Yard sale” means a yard sale, patio sale, garage sale or any similar sale of merchandise by an individual or group for profit when the merchandise to be sold is offered to the general public. [Ord. 1499 § 1, 1971; Code 1970 § 5.52.010.] 5.90.020 Yard sales. (1) Yard sales shall be limited to two such sales in each calendar year for each individual household. No sale shall be conducted for a period of no more than two consecutive calendar days. (2) Merchandise offered for sale at a yard sale must consist of used or secondhand material owned by the person granted the permit or members of the individual household. (3) Any individual household before conducting any yard sale must have a permit. Such a permit is obtained by making application at least 24 hours prior to commencement of the sale, at the Finance office or online at the City’s website (permit application). The application must be made by a member of the individual household 18 years of age or older and shall describe the location and dates of the sale. (4) Upon completion and approval of the application a permit shall be issued containing the information shown in the application. No fee shall be required for yard sale permits. (5) Permits issued under this section. Yard sales shall be restricted to properties zoned or used for residential purposes on private property and shall not be permitted on sidewalks, alleys, streets or any other public way. Location shall be limited to property occupied by the person making the application for the permit. Sales in commercial or industrial areas are subject to “temporary special sales events” permits per Chapter PMC 5.35 PMC. (6) Any sale shall be conducted in an orderly manner and shall not constitute a public nuisance nor hazard to persons or property. (7) Yard sale signs are allowed only for permitted yard sales in conformance with PMC 17.15.020. [Ord. 4100, 2013; Ord. 3560 § 45, 2002; Ord. 1499 § 2, 1971; Code 1970 § 5.52.020.] 5.90.030 Rummage sales. (1) Nonprofit organizations as defined herein may conduct rummage sales upon issuance of a permit by the City Clerk. The permit will be issued when an application is submitted by an authorized member of the organization. The application shall show the name and type of organization, intended use of proceeds from the sale, type of materials to be sold, the location and the date of the sale. Page 159 of 218 (2) A fee as set forth in Chapter 3.35 PMC shall accompany each application for permit and a permit shall be required for each separate sale. The sale shall be conducted for a continuous period of not more than two calendar days. The permit shall be displayed at the site of the sale. (3) Location shall not be limited by application of any zoning requirements, but shall be restricted to private property not necessarily occupied by the organization conducting the sale. Sale shall not be conducted on sidewalks, alleys, streets or other public ways; except as expressly authorized by the City Council. (4) Sales permitted herein shall be conducted in an orderly manner and shall not constitute a public nuisance nor hazard to persons or property. [Ord. 3560 § 46, 2002; Ord. 1499 § 3, 1971; Code 1970 § 5.52.030.] 5.90.040 Sales in hospitals or schools. Nothing contained in this chapter shall restrict or prohibit the operation of gift shops in neither hospitals nor sales by school or parent-teacher organizations within public or private schools. [Ord. 1499 § 4, 1971; Code 1970 § 5.52.040.] 5.90.050 Violations. The conduct of any sale described herein without possession of the permit required herein or any false statement made in an application for a sale permit shall be considered a violation of this chapter. Any person or organization who shall violate any provision of this chapter will be subject to a fine of not more than $500.00. Each day of violation hereof may be considered a separate offense. [Ord. 1499 § 5, 1971; Code 1970 § 5.52.050.] Section 7. Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 5.95 Sidewalk Sales is hereby repealed. Section 8. Amending the Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 9.40.020 Consumption within park and recreation facilities prohibited without permit. Chapter 9.40.020 CONSUMPTION WITHIN PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMIT (1) It is unlawful to open a package containing liquor, or to possess or display an open container of liquor or to consume liquor in any City park or recreation buildings, facility or structures within the City without a current rental permit issued by the City. A rental permit may be issued upon application for such rental permit from the Administrative and Community Services Parks and Recreation Director of the City of Pasco or his designee. Such rental permit may be issued on the following conditions: Page 160 of 218 (a) The applicant must produce evidence that he has a banquet permit from the Washington State Liquor Control Board; (b) Payment of rent in an amount 50 percent higher than the regular rental fee; (c) The applicant deposits a sum determined by the Administrative and Community Services Parks and Recreation Director to be sufficient to insure proper performance of cleanup by the applicant subsequent to the event for which the banquet and rental permit is issued and for payment of damages; (d) The applicant furnishes to the City evidence that he has in full force and effect a liability insurance policy that includes liquor liability, in such amounts and coverages as prescribed by the City’s insurer covering any bodily injury or property damage arising out of or in any way connected with the use of the City facility by the applicant. A surety bond approved by the City in the same amounts may substitute for insurance; (e) The applicant must affirm in writing that the attendance at the function for which the rental permit is issued is not pursuant to a general invitation to the public, but pursuant to invitations to either specifically named individuals or to actual members of the applicant’s organization; provided, that the Community and Economic Development Director, or designee City Council may waive this requirement by resolution upon a showing by the applicant that special circumstances exist which would merit such waiver, and that adequate provisions have been made to accommodate the anticipated number of persons who attend the function for which the rental permit is issued; (f) The applicant agrees that he or she will save the City of Pasco harmless from all losses or damage occasioned to him or her or to any third person or party by reason of any act or omissions of the applicant or anyone using the premises pursuant to the rental permit. He or she shall, after reasonable notice thereof, pay the expense of any suit which may be commenced against the City of Pasco by any third person alleging injury or loss by reason of such acts; (g) The applicant shall furnish written confirmation from the Chief of Police of the City of Pasco that adequate provision has been made by the applicant for police, security, and traffic control, considering the type of activity purposed by the applicant; (h) The applicant shall comply with all applicable fire codes and regulations. (2) Any person violating this section shall be guilty of a Class 3 civil infraction and subject to the penalties imposed thereon by law. [Ord. 3757 § 1, 2006; Ord. 3495 § 1, 2001; Ord. 2333 § 1, 1982; Code 1970 § 9.20.020.] Section 9. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or Page 161 of 218 constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this ordinance. Section 10. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including scrivener’ s errors or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections. Section 11. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this _____ day of _________ 2026. _______________________________ Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________________ _______________________________ Krystle Shanks Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC Deputy City Clerk City Attorney Published: Page 162 of 218 February 13, 2026 | 1 Memo To: City of Pasco Cc: From: Framework Cultural Placemaking Date: 11/06/2025 Re: City Council Meeting 08/25/25 Special Events and Sales Permit Code Update The City of Pasco Community & Economic Development Department (CED) has been working with consultant firm Framework on code amendments focused on Title 5 Business Licenses and Regulations, specifically related to Special Events and different types of sales. On August 25, CED delivered a presentation to City Council outlining overarching goals for the update, as well as key findings from the initial code audit. This Memo outlines proposed code updates aimed at creating an easier process for applicants and review staff that maintains the necessary framework for encouraging safe, vibrant, and well-functioning events. Project Background This effort is part of the implementation of the Pasco Downtown Master Plan, one of the goals of which is to have more events Downtown. The project also comes in response to feedback from Special Event permit applicants who have been deterred or frustrated by the current process. This review also considers sales events, of which there are many types with differing requirements within Title 5. By making updates to Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) and the accompanying permit processes related to Special Events and sales events, this project aims to provide more opportunities for cultural enrichment, economic development, and vibrant public spaces throughout Pasco. Code Audit Process: The consultant and City team performed the following: • Overall review of Title 5 to evaluate clarity, organization, and compatibility with project goals. • Interviews with members of the Police Department, Parks Department, Business Licensing Department, and HAPO Center. • Precedent study to evaluate how other Tri-cities manage Special Events. • Presentation to and feedback from City Council. Page 163 of 218 February 13, 2026 | 2 Proposed Code Updates: Overview The results of the audit, which are highlighted below, yielded the following goals: • Outline clear thresholds for requiring a Special Event Permit. • Outline clear requirements for number and type of security personnel. • Offer pre-approved plans for street closures of various scales. • Clarify and remove some permit requirements related to sales events. • Streamline the permit process to reduce turnaround time. Proposed Code Updates: Special Events Thresholds When is a gathering a “Special Event” that requires a permit? Does a barbeque in the park require a permit? A ribbon-cutting ceremony? A wedding held at a restaurant? Do all events need to adhere to the same permit requirements? Different cities have different systems and thresholds for determining when a Special Event Permit is required. Generally, permits are required when events will require the use of City infrastructure and resources such as: • An influx of drivers creating additional traffic or occupying parking spaces. • The need for City staff during events, or for set-up and clean-up. • Road closures for festivals, races, etc. • The use of public parks, sidewalks, or other public ways. • The need for police presence. Currently, Pasco’s Special Event Permits are based on event types, which require different fees and forms. The interview process revealed the following challenges: • The event-specific requirements are not well-understood by applicants or staff. • Some events do not fall into the prescribed categories, and complying with event-specific requirements may pose an unnecessary burden for these applicants. For example, a ribbon-cutting ceremony may not warrant insurance requirements or security personnel. • There is confusion around what is required of the HAPO center and generally of events that occur within buildings. Page 164 of 218 February 13, 2026 | 3 Recommendation: The proposed update is to establish clear thresholds for when a Special Event Permit is required, with specific forms and fees required based on the content of the event (i.e. road closure, ticket sales, vendors). The proposed thresholds are as follows: A Special Event Permit is required when: (1) The activities and/or expected attendance will trigger a change in occupancy use. For example, a karaoke night with the use of floor space for standing room/dancing that triggers sprinkler requirements based on RCW 19.27.510 “Nightclub” defined” in an unsprinklered building; OR (2) The event involves closing a public street to car traffic; OR (3) The event includes takes place in a park or public way AND (1) Is expected to draw 100 or more people at one time; OR (2) Requires a ticket or paid admission; OR (3) Includes a high risk activity such as fireworks, a petting zoo, or bounce house; OR (4) Involves commercial filming or use of drones; OR (5) Alcohol will be served at the event. The above thresholds are based on the evaluation of several precedent cities, and are aimed at requiring permits for events that will impact the public or pose a safety risk. All other gatherings that do not meet the above thresholds will not require a Special Event Permit. Security Personnel Another key source of confusion around Special Event applications concerns requirements to staff events with security personnel. The current code (5.35.170: Crowd and traffic control) stipulates that: • Police will review applications and determine how many officers shall be present at the event. • Police shall determine the minimum number of private security officers required to be present at the event. However, the Police Department reports that they do not attend events outside of responding to calls for service. Further, they report that there is confusion around the requirements for security personnel, which do not necessarily need to be licensed security guards. In some cases, security guards are not needed, or event staff can perform security duties, allowing them to avoid the fees logistics associated with hiring a certified provider. Precedent: In Kennewick, events with an expected attendance of 1000 or more people at one time and location, as well as events with higher risk activities such as alcohol consumption may be subject to security review. In Page 165 of 218 February 13, 2026 | 4 Richland, security personnel is required for alcohol-free events with 1000 attendees or more, and events with alcohol with 500 attendees or more. Pasco Police Department Analysis: The police department drafted a system for determining the required number and type of security personnel for events based on risk factors of the event. This system includes a matrix that assigns points for elements of an event that may increase risk, with recommendations for security personnel based on those scores. Below is a version of this matrix that has been updated based on testing and a desire for objective requirements. TABLE 1: Event Risk Factor Scoring Matrix Using the above table, we tested the following event types to evaluate how they might score: • Ribbon-cutting ceremony: 2 points • Pride Festival: 11 points • Marathon: 6 points Page 166 of 218 February 13, 2026 | 5 Below, the risk-scoring guide translates point scores into 4 security levels. Based on the above example, we slightly modified the draft scoring guide to align with the above examples. TABLE 2: Risk-Scoring Guide Using the table below, applicants can ascertain their recommended security team based on their event’s risk level: TABLE 3: Security Recommendations Page 167 of 218 February 13, 2026 | 6 Using the above examples, we can deduce the following security recommendations for our event examples: • Ribbon-cutting ceremony: 1-2 trained staff/volunteers • Pride Festival: 15-25 security personnel • Marathon: 2-4 security personnel or trained volunteers Recommendation: Applicants can use the above system to determine their required number and type of security personnel. The Police Department will continue to review applications and confirm whether the proposed security plan is adequate. Road Closures Temporarily closing streets to car traffic can free up space for many types of gatherings, from athletic events to street fairs, neighborhood block parties to car shows. These creative uses of public right-of-way also bring safety, convenience, and logistics factors that must be considered. The two main themes that emerged from interviews are: • 4th Avenue between Lewis St. and Columbia St. works well for events when closed to car traffic. Permanent closure of this street could be considered in the future to bring additional space for events and daily pedestrian use to Downtown. Alternatively, or as a shorter term solution, offering pre-approved street closure plans for 4th Street could facilitate its regular use for events. • Residents desire to occasionally close residential blocks for neighborhood gatherings. These neighborhood block parties may not warrant the same requirements as road closures in commercial areas. Recommendation: • Offer pre-approved street closure plans for 4th Avenue between Lewis St. and Columbia St. • Offer a permit and toolkit for Neighborhood Block Parties. Neighborhood Block Parties could entail the following characteristics: • The use of one city block in a residential zone on a Local or Neighborhood Collector Street (see the Transportation Master Plan for street designations). • Free and open to the public. • Occur for no more than one day, between 9:00 AM and dusk. • Do not take place on a street that has bus service. • All furniture and other event-related items must be easily movable in case of need for emergency service vehicles. • Use of large structures such as a stage or bounce house not permitted. Page 168 of 218 February 13, 2026 | 7 Sales Licenses and Permits Chapter 5 includes provisions for several types of sales events and establishments, including: • 5.35.060: Temporary Sales Events (under Special Events) • 5.35.080: Auction Sales (under Special Events) • 5.80: Pawnbrokers and Secondhand Dealers • 5.85: Flea Markets, Swap Meets, Buy-Sell Markets “and the Like” • 5.90: Rummage and Yard Sales • 5.95: Sidewalk Sales Audit interviews and analysis brought forth the following focuses: Temporary Sales Events WAC 458-20-101 (8)(a) states that “Temporary businesses, for the purposes of registration, are those with definite, predetermined dates of operation for no more than two events each year with each event lasting no longer than one month.” Under current Pasco Municipal Code, Special Event Permits for Temporary Sales Events allow one of more vendors to come together under a single permit for up to ten consecutive days. These events must be open the public, and it is not specified whether they are to take place on public or private property. Temporary Sales Events can vary greatly in scale—they may be farmers markets that bring together dozens of vendors for a public event, or a handful of vendors who wish to utilize the permit as an option for selling their goods outside of a permanent business license. They therefore may not need to adhere to Special Events requirements for security personnel or insurance requirements. Precedent: In Kennewick, temporary vendors have several tiers of permit options. At the most basic, they can apply for a temporary business license, which has a flat fee of $55. Temporary Events with Vendors pay a $15 per vendor, and the permit includes additional requirements such as a site plan. Rummage and Yard Sales Chapter 5.90 outlines requirements for Rummage and Yard Sales, which both require a permit. Rummage Sales may be conducted by nonprofits, who pay a fee, which Chapter 5.90 states is outlined in Chapter 3.35, but no such fee listing currently exists. Yard sale permits are free and are limited to two sales per year. Both Rummage Sales and Yard Sales are to be conducted on private property unless authorized otherwise. Residents and City staff report that yard sale applications present an undue burden on both applicants and staff. Yard sales act as an item of interest for people walking through neighborhoods, and are a way for Page 169 of 218 February 13, 2026 | 8 people to meet each other and exchange items that might otherwise end up in landfill. They are overall a positive activity that the City should encourage. Precedent: In Kennewick, permits are not required for yard sales. Rummage sale permits are $5. Recommendations: • Remove permit requirement for yard sales; specify permit cost for rummage sales or remove the permit requirement. • Offer a Temporary Sales Event permit that includes rummage sales and events with vendors. Sidewalk Sales Chapter 5.95 outlines that a permit is required to conduct a sale on City sidewalks, streets, or other public ways. It stipulates that the permit application shall include a description of the sale location, days, and amount of public way that will be utilized. This chapter overlaps somewhat with the Mobile Vending Chapter (5.75) as well as the Temporary Sales Event section (5.35.060). Chapter 5.75 outlines a framework for licensed vendors who may use specific public areas for mobile vending, with a permit. The Temporary Sales Event section outlines a permit for temporary vending outside of a permanent business license. Chapter 5.95: Sidewalk Sales seems to be tailored towards both: temporary vendors occupying City ways. However, this permit could potentially be utilized by brick-and-mortar businesses who wish to display merchandise on the sidewalk. Recommendation: Sidewalk sales could be incorporated into the new Temporary Sales chapter, which can include a permit option for utilization of the sidewalk. Summary: Types of Permits Using the above recommendations, the City of Pasco would offer the following types of Special Event Permits. Permit applicants may need to obtain more than one permit, depending on their planned event activities: • Special Event on Public Property • Street Closure • Neighborhood Block Party • Special Assembly • Temporary Sales Event Page 170 of 218 Special Events Code & Downtown Initiative Updates April 13, 2026 Pasco City Council Pa g e 1 7 1 o f 2 1 8 OVERVIEW 1.Overview of Special Event code updates 2.Summarize outreach and audit findings 3.Discuss proposed improvements to permit process 4.Other Downtown Initiatives 5.Request City Council direction on draft code amendments Pa g e 1 7 2 o f 2 1 8 Why this update? – Special Events •Downtown Master Plan implementation item •Feedback from event applicants and staff •Permit process currently complex and difficult to navigate •Opportunity to modernize and streamline Title 5 Pa g e 1 7 3 o f 2 1 8 Code audit process – Special Events •Title 5 audit completed with Framework Cultural Placemaking •Interviews with Police, Parks, Business Licensing, and HAPO Center •Tri-Cities precedent review •Council briefing August 25, 2025 •Draft code amendments developed from audit findings Pa g e 1 7 4 o f 2 1 8 Key Improvements Proposed – Special Events •Clear thresholds for Special Event permits •Event Risk Factor Scoring Matrix for security •Simplified permit categories •Clarified street closure and block party process •Streamlined review timelines •Simplified Temporary Sales Event and sidewalk-sales permit Pa g e 1 7 5 o f 2 1 8 Expected outcomes – Special Events •More community events and cultural activities •Increased economic opportunities for vendors and businesses •Reduced administrative burden •Clearer expectations for applicants •Consistent safety standards Pa g e 1 7 6 o f 2 1 8 Downtown Initiatives Downtown lighting pilot — Alley lighting pilot behind Pasco Specialty Kitchen in development; REET funding to be brought forward for Council consideration Mobile vending pilot program — Downtown pilot launched; vendor interest expressed; outreach continuingPa g e 1 7 7 o f 2 1 8 Downtown Initiatives Murals and public art — LTAC-supported murals installed; Peanuts statue installation forthcoming; utility box artwork scheduledPa g e 1 7 8 o f 2 1 8 By Gabriel Ramirez Pa g e 1 7 9 o f 2 1 8 By Mario DeLeon Pa g e 1 8 0 o f 2 1 8 11 By Joey Armstrong Located: Hydrotonix Water Pa g e 1 8 1 o f 2 1 8 By Cameron Milton Pa g e 1 8 2 o f 2 1 8 By Gabriel Ramirez Pa g e 1 8 3 o f 2 1 8 Pa g e 1 8 4 o f 2 1 8 Utility Box Wraps N 5th & W Lewis Afuera de la Jaula By Soleil Olivera Hernandez 4th & Slyvester Interconnected By Kim Lehrman Pa g e 1 8 5 o f 2 1 8 Utility Box Wraps N 5th & W Lewis Gathering at Pasco’s Parade By Kim Lehrman 4th & Lewis Farmers Market, Coffee and Bread By Andrea Moreno Pa g e 1 8 6 o f 2 1 8 Downtown Initiatives Clark Street Improvements (2nd–10th Ave.) •State grant secured •Safety, Ped and Bike roadway improvements •Design anticipated 2026 •Construction anticipated 2027/2028Pa g e 1 8 7 o f 2 1 8 Other Downtown Initiatives Pa g e 1 8 8 o f 2 1 8 Downtown Initiatives Lewis Street Underpass demolition •State grant/loan secured •Fulfills commitment with BNSF, •protects utility corridor, •Creates opportunity for Ec. Dev in railyard •Design and coord. w/BNSF underway •Construction anticipated 2026 Pa g e 1 8 9 o f 2 1 8 Downtown Initiatives Recent downtown support actions •Sprinkler-requirement clarification memo issued •CDBG funding for sprinkler feasibility studies •Two façade improvements completed •Assistance to businesses impacted by Lewis Street overpass closure Pa g e 1 9 0 o f 2 1 8 Downtown Initiatives •CDBG façade two improvements completed Pa g e 1 9 1 o f 2 1 8 Recommendation - Special Events NOW BACK TO SPECIAL EVENTS… Staff recommends that the City Council: •Review the draft Special Event code amendments •Consider feedback from outreach (February 17, 2026) •Provide direction to staff •Staff will then prepare a final draft ordinance for public hearing and consideration of adoption Pa g e 1 9 2 o f 2 1 8 Pa g e 1 9 3 o f 2 1 8 Questions? Pa g e 1 9 4 o f 2 1 8 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 13, 2026 TO: Harold Stewart, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 4/13/26 FROM: Maria Serra, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Resolution - Professional Services Agreement Amendment No. 1 with RH2 Engineering, Inc. for Design Services for the Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements Project (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Resolution Exhibit A - Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement Power Point Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Summary: Original PSA $62,265.00 Proposed Amendment No. 1 $251,923.00 New PSA Total $314,188.00 Project funds are planned for this item as follows:  $1,344,500 is bonded  $4,419,564 has been identified as Community Project Funding (CPF) administered through Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for this project IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Background The City of Pasco (City) owns and operates the Foster Wells Lift Station (FWLS), located near the intersection of East Foster Wells Road and Industrial Way. The station was designed and constructed in 1994 to convey process wastewater from several fruit and vegetable processors in the area, including Page 195 of 218 Pasco Processing, Twin City Foods, and Reser’s Fine Foods. The FWLS collects and transfers this wastewater to the Pasco Resource Recovery Center for primary treatment. From there, process water is conveyed either to the Process Water Reuse Facility (PWRF) for storage or to the land treatment system for land application and crop production. The FWLS has a firm pumping capacity of 4,300 gallons per minute (gpm) with 4 vertical turbine pumps. All four (4) pumps have 100 horsepower (hp) motors. Pump Nos.1 and 2 are connected to a 16-inch carbon steel discharge manifold while pump Nos. 3 and 4 are connected to a 24-inch carbon steel discharge manifold. The FWLS Improvements project intends to replace both discharge manifolds to avoid failure, as they have exhibited pinhole leaks. The proposed stainless steel discharge manifolds will be replumbed within the FWLS so that Pump Nos. 1 and 3 will be connected to a common 20-inch header, and Pump Nos. 2 and 4 will be connected to a second 20-inch stainless steel header. This will balance discharge from the FWLS and provide operators with more operational flexibility. This project will also perform an updated condition assessment of the entire lift station, including structural, mechanical, electrical, and control components, to determine if any components need to be rehabilitated with the manifold replacement project. The PWRF Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements project will also address corrosion issues caused by process water from contributing processors. This involves replacing the existing header at the Foster Wells Lift Station and adding a second header for system redundancy. for the through selected Request (RH2) Inc., Engineering, RH2 was Qualifications process and originally contracted on September 24, 2025 by the City provide FWLS, of assessment the a perform to condition recommendations for rehabilitation, include City-selected rehabilitation components into the final design, and provide construction contract administration. The condition assessment concludes that the most critical deficiencies at the FWLS are associated with the mechanical systems, electrical system, and controls infrastructure. The existing mechanical components, including corroded manifolds, piping, and valves, exhibit advanced deterioration and constant leakage, representing the highest near-term risk to continued reliable operation. The recommended wet well ventilation system improvements should be implemented concurrently with the mechanical upgrades. Electrical and control improvements represent the next highest priority. This amendment allows selected items from the condition assessment to be designed, bid, and constructed as part of the FWLS Improvements Project. Page 196 of 218 Impact (other than fiscal) The proposed upgrades will provide the distribution repairs and redundancy needed to meet the intake and, in turn, output requirements for the PWRF. It also allows the City to ensure that it meets the contracted distribution of effluent from the processors. V. DISCUSSION: Recommendation Staff has reviewed and recommends approval of Amendment No. 1 to the PSA with RH2 Engineering in the amount of $251,923.00 for the PWRF - Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements project. The proposed Amendment No. 1 to RH2 Professional services agreement allows for the design, permitting, bidding, and construction services for the city selected findings of the condition assessment. Those findings include that the most critical deficiencies at the FWLS are associated with the mechanical systems, electrical system, and controls infrastructure. Constraints The construction of this project should be completed as soon as reasonably possible due to the ongoing efforts of City staff regularly repairing items at the Lift Station. To save construction costs, the majority of the construction work should be completed in concurrence with processor low flow times which will reduce the amount of time of by-pass piping and equipment. If these repairs are not done, downtime from repairs or failure could result in contract disputes and failures with the Department of Ecology Permits. Next Steps the with work will staff amendment, the approves Council the Provided consultant to complete all necessary contractual documentation and begin design. Alternatives  Council may choose to reject the amendment. If so, options in the Technical Memo for the condition assessment can be re-assessed by the City for a different combination of needed design and construction items. Page 197 of 218 Resolution - Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements PSA Amendment No. 1 - 1 RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, APPROVES AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 1 FOR THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RH2 ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE DESIGN OF THE FOSTER WELLS LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) and RH2 Engineering, Inc., entered into a Professional Service Agreement on September 4th, 2025, to provide Engineering services with respect to the Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements project; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into Amendment No. 1 with RH2 Engineering, Inc.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of Amendment No. 1 between the City of Pasco, and RH2 Engineering as attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Amendment No. 1 on behalf of the City of Pasco, and Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution shall take effect immediately. Page 198 of 218 Resolution - Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements PSA Amendment No. 1 - 2 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of April, 2026. Charles Grimm Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Krystle Shanks Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC Deputy City Clerk City Attorney Page 199 of 218 RH2 Engineering, Inc. Amendment No. 1 to PSA Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements – Project Number (25682) Page 1 AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 to PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements PROJECT: 25682 AGREEMENT NO. 25-017 WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc. entered into a Professional Services Agreement on September, 24, 2025 to provide engineering services with respect to the Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements project. NOW, THEREFORE, this agreement is amended to allow RH2 Engineering, Inc. to provide additional engineering services for Design services, Bidding support, and Construction services as described in Exhibit A. 1. Scope of Work: See Exhibit A. 2. Fee: The compensation for the work is based on a Time and Materials Basis not to exceed the amount of $251,923.00 for a total authorization amount of $314,188.00. See Exhibit B for full breakdown. 3. Time of performance: The time performance for services are unchanged and will be complete for the project on or before December 31, 2027. DATED THIS DAY______________________________. [date of execution] CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON RH2 ENGINEERING, INC. Harold L. Stewart II - City Manager Dan Mahlum, PE - Principal Page 200 of 218 1 2/12/2026 1:28:13 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\25-0198\00 CONTRACT\A-1\A1_SOW_FOSTER WELLS LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS.DOCX EXHIBIT A Scope of Work Amendment No. 1 City of Pasco Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements February 2026 Background The City of Pasco (City) owns and operates the Foster Wells Lift Station (FWLS), located near the intersection of East Foster Wells Road and Industrial Way. The station was designed and constructed in 1994 to convey process wastewater from several fruit and vegetable processors in the area, including Pasco Processing, Twin City Foods, and Reser’s Fine Foods. The FWLS collects and transfers this wastewater to the Pasco Resource Recovery Center for primary treatment. From there, process water is conveyed either to the Process Water Reuse Facility for storage or to the land treatment system for land application and crop production. The FWLS has a firm pumping capacity of 4,300 gallons per minute (gpm) at 255 feet of total dynamic head (TDH) with 4 vertical turbine pumps. Pump Nos. 1 and 2 have 100 horsepower (hp) motors and are capable of pumping 1,850 gpm at 185 feet of TDH. Pumps Nos. 3 and 4 have 100 hp motors and are capable of pumping 3,890 gpm at 264 feet of TDH. Pumps Nos. 1 and 2 are connected to a 16- inch carbon steel discharge manifold. Pumps Nos. 3 and 4 are connected to a 24-inch carbon steel discharge manifold. The City intends to replace both discharge manifolds to avoid failure, as they have exhibited pinhole leaks. The proposed stainless steel discharge manifolds will be replumbed within the FWLS so that Pump Nos. 1 and 3 will be connected to a common 20-inch header, and Pump Nos. 2 and 4 will be connected to a second 20-inch stainless steel header. This will balance discharge from the FWLS and provide operators with more operational flexibility. The City would also like an updated condition assessment of the entire lift station , including structural, mechanical, electrical, and control components, to determine if any components need to be rehabilitated with the manifold replacement project. RH2 Engineering, Inc., (RH2) completed the condition assessment of FWLS on October 29, 2025. Based on that assessment, RH2 provided preliminary findings and recommendations for upgrades to the City at an in-person meeting on November 3, 2025. Due to the time sensitivity of these improvements, the technical memorandum for Task 2 – Lift Station Site Investigation from the original scope of work and final design will occur concurrently. This Scope of Work captures the effort to provide the bid-ready design, bidding support services, and limited services during construction of the City-selected FWLS improvements based on the November 3, 2025, meeting, with support provided by RH2’s subsidiary Control Systems NW LLC (CSNW) via subcontract. Page 201 of 218 City of Pasco Exhibit A – Scope of Work Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements Amendment No. 1 2 2/12/2026 1:28:13 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\25-0198\00 CONTRACT\A-1\A1_SOW_FOSTER WELLS LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS.DOCX General Assumptions The following assumptions were made when preparing this Scope of Work: • RH2 will rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information, data, and materials generated or produced by the City in relation to this Scope of Work. RH2 assumes that the entity providing such information to RH2 is either the owner of such information or has obtained written authorization from the owner to distribute said information. • Deliverables will be submitted in electronic format (PDF) unless otherwise noted. • Due to the limited mechanical changes anticipated at the FWLS, there will be no hydraulic modeling developed for this Scope of Work. Piping will be sized to maintain existing flow velocities through the new piping. • Construction of the proposed improvements will occur in phases to facilitate the continuous operation of the FWLS and prioritize the replacement of the existing header. • The City intends to acquire and utilize funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for this project. HUD funding requires compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and for construction, incorporation of Build America, Buy America (BABA) requirements. Consequently, this Scope of Work includes effort to assist the City with project requirements related to federal funding. Task 1 — Project Management and Administration Services Objective: Manage the RH2 project team and maintain regular communication with the City for efficient coordination of various tasks. Attend and participate in project meetings and perform quality control reviews of project deliverables. Approach: 1.7 Provide direction, coordination, and oversight to the RH2 project team. Organize, manage, and coordinate technical disciplines as described herein, and implement quality assurance and quality control reviews of project deliverables. 1.8 Attend one (1) kick-off meeting with the City to discuss final design criteria and the project schedule. Task 3 — Bid-Ready Design Objective: Prepare bid-ready project plans and specifications. Approach: 3.1 Prepare cover sheets and general information sheets. 3.2 Prepare the mechanical plans for the FWLS, including new discharge piping from all four (4) existing pumps, two (2) new discharge headers with (1) header being relocated to the breezeway outside of the FWLS, extending discharge piping from the newly relocated header to the existing discharge piping, replacing two (2) check valves on the larger pumps, adding two Page 202 of 218 City of Pasco Exhibit A – Scope of Work Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements Amendment No. 1 3 2/12/2026 1:28:13 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\25-0198\00 CONTRACT\A-1\A1_SOW_FOSTER WELLS LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS.DOCX (2) new flow meters on above-grade discharge piping outside of the FWLS, and minor mechanical equipment sizing. 3.3 Prepare structural plans and calculations to support the mechanical improvements and improve maintenance access and construction activities. Improvements include proposed pipe penetrations through existing walls, a gantry crane over the discharge piping within the FWLS, pipe supports for the new headers and discharge piping, and a new access door on the western wall of the FWLS to facilitate removal of mechanical piping and fittings. Structural plans will include exterior elevations, floor plan, building sections, and pipe support details. It is assumed that the structural improvements will be above grade and will match the architectural look of the existing building, utilizing a concrete floor, concrete masonry unit walls, and a wood-framed roof. 3.4 Prepare heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) plans to support the replacement and relocation of the header and electrical gear. Improvements include the replacement and relocation of the wet well air exchange system, the replacement of indoor HVAC units with exhaust fans, and the replacement of the existing heaters within the building. 3.5 Prepare electrical and control plans for the installation of new outdoor-rated variable frequency drives (VFDs), a new automatic transfer switch, flow meters, radar level transducers, and freeze protection of outdoor piping. 3.6 Prepare technical specifications using RH2’s modified Construction Specifications Institute format (Divisions 1 through 18) and incorporate with the City’s construction contract documents and general conditions. 3.7 Prepare a 60-percent, 90-percent, and bid-ready opinion of probable construction cost (OPCC). 3.8 Meet with the City to review the 60-percent, 90-percent, and bid-ready design documents and OPCC. Prepare meeting minutes and distribute to attendees. 3.9 Incorporate BABA and other applicable federal-funding requirements into project design and construction documents. This subtask assumes up to thirty (30) hours of RH2 effort to incorporate federal funding requirements into project plans, specifications, and estimate (PSE), as needed. Assumptions: • VFDs will be relocated to the exterior of the FWLS, with operator interface screens located inside the building. • Discharge piping and headers will be stainless steel. • There will be no structural or mechanical improvements related to the existing pumps. Provided by City: • Construction contract documents and general conditions in MS Word format. • Attendance at design review meetings and comments on 60-percent, 90-percent, and bid-ready design documents. Page 203 of 218 City of Pasco Exhibit A – Scope of Work Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements Amendment No. 1 4 2/12/2026 1:28:13 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\25-0198\00 CONTRACT\A-1\A1_SOW_FOSTER WELLS LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS.DOCX RH2 Deliverables: • 60-percent, 90-percent, and bid-ready design plans, specifications, and OPCC. • Attendance at design review meetings and meeting minutes. Task 4 — Permitting Objective: Assist the City with local and federal permit compliance to facilitate project construction. Coordinate with the City and HUD regarding NEPA compliance , prepare NEPA documentation, and facilitate HUD's review and buy-off on NEPA compliance. Support the City in obtaining a Commercial Building Permit for project construction. Approach: 4.1 Coordinate with City Planning regarding project improvements and anticipated State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) exemption for the project. Confirm SEPA exemption for the file and the Commercial Building Permit (CBP) application. 4.2 Prepare CBP application package, provide to the City for review and signatures, finalize and submit the final permit application to the City for review and approval. This subtask assumes up to twenty-five (25) hours of RH2 effort to prepare and submit the CBP application. 4.3 Coordinate with the City and HUD regarding project funding and NEPA compliance requirements. Prepare HUD-specific form, project narrative, design information, maps, discussion of project compliance with applicable federal statutes, and supporting materials to justify project applicability as a categorically excluded (CE) activity. Submit CE package to HUD for review and NEPA compliance processing. Respond to HUD questions and facilitate HUDs review of the NEPA documentation and issuance of a CE determination for the project. Assumptions: • Local permitting will be through the City as the FWLS is within City limits. • Improvements to the FWLS apply for a SEPA exemption as a repair, remodeling, or maintenance activity (Washington Administrative Code [WAC] 197-11-800(3)). SEPA exemption confirmation will be made by the City’s Planning Department as the SEPA Lead Agency. RH2 will coordinate with City Planning to confirm and record the exemption for this project. • Improvements at the FWLS will apply under HUD’s list of categorically excluded activities (24 Code of Federal Regulation 58.35). Based on RH2’s review of HUD's CE activities, improvements planned are anticipated to be covered under activities reconstruction of existing utility facilities or buildings. Consequently, RH2 has assumed the level of effort for NEPA compliance will be commiserate with a CE type, as opposed to an Environmental Assessment level of effort. Subtask 4.3 assumes up to sixty (60) hours of RH2 effort for Page 204 of 218 City of Pasco Exhibit A – Scope of Work Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements Amendment No. 1 5 2/12/2026 1:28:13 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\25-0198\00 CONTRACT\A-1\A1_SOW_FOSTER WELLS LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS.DOCX coordination with HUD and the City, preparation of the CE package, submittal, and facilitation of HUD approval. • FWLS is located outside of any Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) National Register of Historic Properties listed properties or sites. The site is within a moderate risk polygon for DAHP’s predictive index of the potential for encountering cultural resources. Site disturbance is anticipated to be within areas of the site that have already been disturbed. Additionally, the project activities are anticipated to apply for a CE type for NEPA compliance. Consequently, this Scope of Work assumes compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act will not require a cultural resources survey (CRS). If HUD determines a CRS is needed for NEPA compliance, an amendment to this Scope of Work may be warranted. • Site improvements involve less than 1 acre of land disturbance and will not involve discharge to State waters; consequently, the project will not require Construction Stormwater General Permit coverage. Provided by City: • Submission of permit applications and payment of permit fees. • Review of preliminary permit packages, as desired. • Attendance at any virtual meetings with HUD, if determined to be necessary for NEPA compliance discussions. RH2 Deliverables: • Electronic records of City and HUD coordination, emails, etc. • Record of project SEPA exemption through City Planning. • Preliminary and final CBP application package. • CE package for NEPA compliance. Task 5 — Bidding Support Services Objective: Assist the City with the bidding of the FWLS Improvements project. It is assumed that the City will advertise the project and be the main point of contact for bidders. RH2 will refer all interested bidders with questions to the City. Approach: 5.1 Assist the City with the pre-procurement bid package of the stainless-steel fabricated header if necessary. 5.2 Prepare bid advertisement and coordinate the timing and placement of the bid advertisement with the City. The City will submit the advertisement to the appropriate publications and pay advertisement fees. 5.3 Attend one (1) pre-bid walkthrough with prospective bidders. Page 205 of 218 City of Pasco Exhibit A – Scope of Work Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements Amendment No. 1 6 2/12/2026 1:28:13 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\25-0198\00 CONTRACT\A-1\A1_SOW_FOSTER WELLS LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS.DOCX 5.4 Respond to contractor or supplier technical questions during bidding. 5.5 Prepare up to two (2) addenda as requested to clarify, revise, or change the construction plans, technical specifications, or project conditions during the bidding process. 5.6 Attend the bid opening virtually and review the bid tabulation. Review bidders’ qualifications and prepare a letter of recommendation of award. 5.7 Create electronic conformed for construction contract documents for contractors, if requested. Provided by City: • Submission of the advertisement and bid documents to the appropriate publications and payment of fees. • Attendance at pre-bid walkthrough with prospective bidders. • Issuance of addenda as needed. • Administer bid opening and prepare bid tabulation. • Potential pre-procurement of the stainless steel fabricated header to ensure replacement can occur before June 2026. RH2 Deliverables: • Pre-procurement bid package (if necessary) • Bid advertisement. • Attendance at pre-bid walkthrough. • Responses to contractor or supplier questions via telephone or email. • Up to two (2) addenda. • Letter of recommendation of award. • Conformed for construction contract documents, if requested. Task 6 — Services During Construction (Limited) Objective: Provide limited engineering services during construction to support the City. As the engineer of record, coordinate with the City, its designated utilities, and the special inspector to respond to technical questions and issues. Review limited technical submittals, as requested by the City, for general conformance to the project specifications. Provide written comments to the City. Services include reviewing limited technical submittals, responding to requests for information (RFIs), performing on-site observations, and assisting with change proposals and change orders. Approach: 6.1 Respond to contractor RFIs, as requested by the City. Document and transmit responses to the City. Page 206 of 218 City of Pasco Exhibit A – Scope of Work Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements Amendment No. 1 7 2/12/2026 1:28:13 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\25-0198\00 CONTRACT\A-1\A1_SOW_FOSTER WELLS LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS.DOCX 6.2 Perform limited on-site observations up to forty (40) hours, as requested by the City, in coordination with the City’s designated inspector(s). Provide brief field notes summarizing observations. 6.3 Assist with change proposals and change orders as requested by the City. 6.4 Review technical submittals as requested by the City. 6.5 Provide programming and integration services for the controls installed during construction. Programming will include programmable logic controllers, operator interface screens, and the computer-based supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. It is assumed that the programming will be based on standard programming developed for the City by RH2’s subsidiary, CSNW. Integrate the programming upgrades with the existing City system, including connecting the existing Historian system to the SCADA system programmed as part of this project. It is assumed that the FWLS will communicate with the Process Water Reuse Facility’s existing SCADA system. 6.6 Provide observation and support during startup activities, including the final operation of the newly installed hardware/software components. 6.7 Review field records provided by the contractor and prepare construction record drawings based on the changes. Assumptions: • It is anticipated that the City will be the lead inspector, lead construction contract administration, and be responsible for day-to-day activities. A maximum of 146 hours is estimated to review technical submittals, respond to contractor questions, provide limited on- site observations, assist with change orders, and provide programming and startup services as shown in the attached Fee Estimate. If additional effort is needed, that extr a work will be mutually determined by the City and RH2. • RH2 and CSNW are not responsible for site safety, or for determining means and methods or directing others in their work. RH2 Deliverables: • Technical submittals. • Applicable RFI responses. • Field notes summarizing on-site observations. • Change order proposals. • Programming and integration services. • Attendance at startup activities. • Construction record drawings. Page 207 of 218 City of Pasco Exhibit A – Scope of Work Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements Amendment No. 1 8 2/12/2026 1:28:13 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\25-0198\00 CONTRACT\A-1\A1_SOW_FOSTER WELLS LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS.DOCX Project Schedule It is anticipated that RH2 will receive notice to proceed in March 2026. Bid-ready design is anticipated to occur within twelve (12) weeks following notice to proceed, on a date mutually agreed upon by the City and RH2. Bidding is anticipated to occur by May 1, 2026, with bid award occurring before June 1, 2026. Services during construction are anticipated to occur in two phases under one contract. Phase 1 – Header Replacement will occur prior to June 1, 2026. Phase 2 – Electrical and HVAC Improvements is anticipated to be completed by October 2026. Page 208 of 218 EXHIBIT B Fee Estimate Amendment No. 1 City of Pasco Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements Feb-26 Description Total Hours Total RH2 Labor Total Subconsultant Total RH2 Expense Total Expense Total Cost Task 1 Project Management and Administration Services 84 22,204$ 3,480$ 736$ 736$ 26,420$ Task 3 Bid-Ready Design 387 83,650$ 20,954$ 9,049$ 9,049$ 113,653$ Task 4 Permitting 95 19,477$ -$ 1,201$ 1,201$ 20,678$ Task 5 Bidding Support Services 88 19,987$ 1,160$ 1,344$ 1,344$ 22,491$ Task 6 Services During Construction (Limited)166 38,712$ 26,880$ 3,089$ 3,089$ 68,681$ PROJECT TOTAL 820 184,030$ 52,474$ 15,419$ 15,419$ 251,923$ \\corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\PSC\25-0198\00 Contract\A-1\A1_FEE_Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements 2/12/2026 4:37 PM Page 209 of 218 price per mile (or Current IRS Rate) Subconsultants 15%Cost + Outside Services at cost RATE LIST RATE UNIT Professional I $182 $/hr Professional II $199 $/hr Professional III $222 $/hr Professional IV $243 $/hr Professional V $259 $/hr Professional VI $280 $/hr Professional VII $306 $/hr Professional VIII $333 $/hr Professional IX $336 $/hr Technician I $139 $/hr Technician II $154 $/hr Technician III $178 $/hr Technician IV $189 $/hr Technician V $206 $/hr Technician VI $226 $/hr Technician VII $245 $/hr Technician VIII $257 $/hr Control Specialist I $182 $/hr Control Specialist II $199 $/hr Control Specialist III $222 $/hr Control Specialist IV $243 $/hr Control Specialist V $259 $/hr Control Specialist VI $280 $/hr Control Specialist VII $306 $/hr Control Specialist VIII $333 $/hr Control Specialist IX $336 $/hr Control Technician I $139 $/hr Control Technician II $154 $/hr Control Technician III $178 $/hr Control Technician IV $189 $/hr Control Technician V $206 $/hr Control Technician VI $226 $/hr Control Technician VII $245 $/hr Control Technician VIII $257 $/hr Administrative I $94 $/hr Administrative II $109 $/hr Administrative III $129 $/hr Administrative IV $154 $/hr Administrative V $180 $/hr CAD/GIS System $27.50 $/hr CAD Plots - Half Size $2.50 price per plot CAD Plots - Full Size $10.00 price per plot CAD Plots - Large $25.00 price per plot Copies (bw) 8.5" X 11"$0.09 price per copy Copies (bw) 8.5" X 14"$0.14 price per copy Copies (bw) 11" X 17"$0.20 price per copy Copies (color) 8.5" X 11"$0.90 price per copy Copies (color) 8.5" X 14"$1.20 price per copy Copies (color) 11" X 17"$2.00 price per copy Technology Charge 2.50%% of Direct Labor Night Work 10.00%% of Direct Labor Mileage $0.7250 EXHIBIT C RH2 ENGINEERING, INC. 2026 SCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES Rates listed are adjusted annually. Page 210 of 218 Pasco City Council April 13, 2026 Workshop Pa g e 2 1 1 o f 2 1 8 Foster Wells Lift Station (FWLS) Improvements Project Professional Services Agreement Amendment No. 1 04/13/2026 Pasco City Council Pa g e 2 1 2 o f 2 1 8 FWLS Professional Services Costs 3 Pa g e 2 1 3 o f 2 1 8 FWLS Professional Services Costs 4 The proposed Amendment No. 1 adds $251,923.00 to the project and brings the total professional services agreement amount to $314,188.00. The added services for Amendment No. 1 are summarized below: ❑ Task 1 – Project Management and Administration Services ❑Task 3 – Bid-Ready Design ❑Task 4 – Permitting ❑Task 5 – Bidding Support Services ❑Task 6 – Services During Construction (Limited) The professional services agreement was verified as necessary and negotiated with City staff. Staff recommends approval of PSA Amendment No. 1. Pa g e 2 1 4 o f 2 1 8 FWLS Professional Services Costs 5 Professional Services Agreement Cost Original PSA $ 62,265.00 PSA Amendment No. 1 $ 251,923.00 New Professional Services Agreement $314,188.00 Pa g e 2 1 5 o f 2 1 8 Questions? Pa g e 2 1 6 o f 2 1 8 Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re- investment in community infrastructure. City Council Goals QUALITY OF LIFE 2024-2025 Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services and programs. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system. COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK Implement targeted strategies to reduce crime through strategic investments in infrastructure, staffing, and equipment. COMMUNITY SAFETY Promote and encourage economic vitality. ECONOMIC VITALITY Identify opportunities to enhance City of Pasco identity, cohesion, and image. CITY IDENTITY Page 217 of 218 METAS DEL CONCEJO MUNICIPAL 2024-2025 Promover una alta calidad de vida a través de programas, servicios y inversion apropiada y reinversión en la comunidad infraestructura comunitaria. CALIDAD DE VIDA Promover viabilidad financiera a largo plazo, valor, y niveles de calidad de los servicios y programas. SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA Promover un sistema de transporte multimodal altamente funcional. RED DE TRANSPORTE DE LA COMUNIDAD Implementar estrategias específicas para reducir la delincuencia por medios de inversiones estratégicas en infraestructura, personal y equipo. SEGURIDAD DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica. VITALIDAD ECONOMICA Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la cohesión, y la imagen. IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA Page 218 of 218