HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025.08.18 Council Meeting Packet
AGENDA
City Council Regular Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, August 18, 2025
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar
Page
1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would
like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out
the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment)
to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings
must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this meeting.
To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-332-249-0718 and use access
code 619 160 621#.
City Council meetings are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at
www.facebook.com/cityofPasco.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for
assistance.
Servicio de intéprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la
Secretaria Municipal dos dias antes para garantizar la disponiblidad.
(Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request.
Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure
availability.)
2. CALL TO ORDER
3. ROLL CALL
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
4. OATH OF OFFICE - CITY MANAGER ADMINISTERED BY CITY CLERK
5. ELECTION OF MAYOR AND POSSIBLE ELECTION OF MAYOR PRO
TEM
Page 1 of 276
6. CONSENT AGENDA - All items listed under the Consent Agenda are
considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call
vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate
discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by
Councilmembers, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the
Regular Agenda and considered separately.
6 - 18 (a) Approval of Meeting Minutes for August 4th and August 11th
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting
held on August 4, 2025, and a Special Workshop and Regular
Workshop held on August 11, 2025.
19 - 20 (b) Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total
Amount of $4,648,953.92
To approve claims in the total amount of $4,648,953.92
($1,797,717.45 in Check Nos. 273028 - 273280; $1,482,281.02 in
Electronic Transfer Nos. 850703, 850715 - 850716, 850719 - 850720,
850790 - 850795, 850797 - 850798; $21,136.03 in Check Nos. 55031
- 55054; $1,343,352.87 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30229387 -
30230081;$1,930.55 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 1027 - 1028
;$2,536.00 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 359 - 361).
21 - 76 (c) Resolution No. 4637 Change Order No. 11 Process Water Reuse
Facility Phase 2 Construction Contract with Tapani and
Resolution No. 4638 RH2 Engineering PSA Amendment 7
To approve Resolution No 4637, authorizing the City Manager to
execute Change Order No. 11 with Tapani, Inc. for the Process Water
Reuse Facility Phase 2: Winter Storage Improvements Project.
-and-
To approve Resolution No. 4638, authorizing the City Manager to
execute Amendment No. 7 for the Professional Services Agreement
with RH2 Engineering, Inc. for the Process Water Reuse Facility
(PWRF) Pretreatment Improvement Phase 2: Winter Storage.
(RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
7. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
8. PUBLIC COMMENTS - The public may address Council on any items
unless it relates to a scheduled Public Hearing. This item is provided to
allow the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to
express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for
debate or for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate
response. Some questions require consideration by Council over time and
after a deliberative process with input from a number of different sources;
Page 2 of 276
some questions are best directed to staff members who have access to
specific information. Citizen comments will normally be limited to three
minutes each by the Mayor. Those with lengthy messages are invited to
summarize their comments and/or submit written information for
consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings. Lastly, when called
upon, please state your name and city or county residency into the
microphone before providing your comments.
9. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS
(a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
77 - 102 (b) Presentation - Mid-Columbia Library Annexation (10 minute
presentation)
Presentation - Pasco's Mid-Columbia Libraries Annexation from Kyle
Cox, Mid-Columbia Libraries Executive Director
10. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO
103 - 126 (a) Public Hearing & Ordinance No. 4782 - Big Sky Developers, LLC
- Easement Vacation (VAC2025-001) (5 minute staff presentation)
CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4782, vacating the eastern
three feet of the easement established by Auditor's File Number
487139, originally granted by the Northern Pacific Railway Company
and, further, authorize publication by summary only.
11. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS
127 - 139 (a) Resolution No. 4639 - Providing Notice of Termination Between
Mid-Columbia Libraries and City of Pasco
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4639, authorizing the
City Manager to serve a notice of termination of the Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement between the City of Pasco and Mid-
Columbia Libraries.
140 - 207 (b) *Q Ordinance No. 4783 - Webster Court Rezone from R-S-20 to R-
1 (5 minute staff presentation)
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4783, amending the Zoning
Classification of certain real property located near the corner of W
Argent Road and Road 84, and, further, authorize publication by
summary only.
Page 3 of 276
208 - 213 (c) Ordinance No. 4784 - Carryover Funds for Capital Projects from
2023-2024 Biennium (1 minute staff presentation)
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4784, amending the 2025-
2026 Biennial Budget (Ordinance No. 4750) of the City of Pasco,
Washington, by providing supplement thereto; to provide for
additional appropriation from the carryover of the prior year budget to
complete capital projects and, further, authorize publication by
summary only.
214 - 257 (d) Resolution No. 4640 - Enacting the City Council Speed Limit
Setting Policy (3 minute staff presentation)
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4640, adopting and
approving the City Council Speed Limit Setting Policy.
258 - 272 (e) Resolution No. 4641 - Adopting a Commitment Goal to Reduce
Fatal and Serious Injuries on City Roads by 50% by 2040 (5
minute staff presentation)
MOTION A: I move to approve Resolution No. 4641, adopting a
commitment goal to reduce fatal and serious injuries on City roads by
50% by 2040.
-or-
MOTION B: I move to approve Resolution No. 4641, adopting a
commitment goal to reduce fatal and serious injuries on City roads by
50% by 2035.
12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
13. NEW BUSINESS
273 - 274 (a) Council Appointment Process for Council Position No. 4, Voting
District No. 4 (5 minute staff presentation)
14. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION
15. EXECUTIVE SESSION
(a) Discussion with Legal Counsel About Current or Potential
Litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) (7 minutes)
16. ADJOURNMENT
17. ADDITIONAL NOTES
Page 4 of 276
(a) (RC) Roll Call Vote Required
* Item not previously discussed
Q Quasi-Judicial Matter
MF# “Master File #....”
275 - 276 (b) Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only)
(c) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the
City Clerk for assistance.
Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por
favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para
garantizar la disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter
service may be provided upon request. Please provide two
business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.)
Page 5 of 276
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 13, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 8/18/25
FROM: Debra Barham, City Clerk
City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Meeting Minutes for August 4th and August 11th
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
8.4.2025 and 8.11.2025 Draft Council Minutes
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting held on
August 4, 2025, and a Special Workshop and Regular Workshop held on
August 11, 2025.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 6 of 276
MINUTES
City Council Regular Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, August 4, 2025
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Pete Serrano, Mayor.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Pete Serrano, David Milne, Blanche Barajas, Melissa
Blasdel, Charles Grimm, and Leo Perales
Councilmembers attending remotely: None
Councilmembers absent: Peter Harpster
Staff present: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City
Manager; Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager; Griselda Garcia, Interim
Finance Director; Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; Haylie
Miller, Community & Economic Development Director; Jesse Rice, Parks &
Recreation Director; Brent Cook, Deputy Police Chief; Maria Serra, Public Works
Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ORDER
Amend the Order of Tonight's Agenda
Mayor Serrano recommended amending the order of the agenda to acknowledge
an individual before moving into Executive Session.
MOTION: Councilmember Grimm moved, seconded by Councilmember
Barajas to change the order of the agenda and move the Proclamation and
Acknowledgements section of the Agenda before going into Executive Session.
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Page 1 of 8Page 7 of 276
Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember
Grimm, and Councilmember Perales
ABSENT: Councilmember Harpster
PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Good Samaritan Recognition for Nick Garcia
Mr. Perales read an email from Sarah Reagan who expressed appreciation to
Nick Garcia for acting quickly to extinguish a fire in her backyard while she and
her family were away from their home.
Mayor Serrano also presented a letter of appreciation from City Council to Nick
Garcia for dousing a fire on the July 4th before it could further damage property or
injure anyone in a West Pasco neighborhood. He expressed gratitude for Mr.
Garcia's swift actions to minimize damage in a dangerous situation.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Council adjourned into Executive Session at 7:09 PM for 20 minutes returning at
7:29 PM to consider site selection or acquisition of real estate purchase or lease if
likelihood that disclosure would increase price per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) with the
City Manager, Deputy City Manager, and City Attorney.
At 7:28 PM Mayor Serrano announced that the Executive Session would continue
for another 10 minutes or until 7:38 PM.
At 7:38 PM Mayor Serrano announced that the Executive Session would continue
for another 5 minutes or until 7:43 PM.
Mayor Serrano called the meeting back to order at 7:43 PM.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Meeting Minutes for July 21st and July 28th
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting held on July
21, 2025, and Regular Workshop held on July 28, 2025.
Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of
$4,036,399.88
To approve claims in the total amount of $4,036,399.88 ($2,548,878.40 in Check
Nos. 272761 - 273027; $176,361.59 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 850436 - 850526,
850539 - 850682, 850687, 850696; $18,134.58 in Check Nos. 55011 - 55030;
$1,293,025.31 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30228700 - 30229386).
Page 2 of 8Page 8 of 276
Resolution No. 4627 - Project Acceptance for the I-182 and Broadmoor Blvd
Interchange Project
To approve Resolution No. 4627, accepting work performed by Nelson
Construction Corp., under contract for the I-182 & Broadmoor Blvd Interchange
Project.
Resolution No. 4628 - Project Acceptance for the Broadmoor TIF -
Broadmoor/Burns Intersection Project
To approve Resolution No. 4628, accepting work performed by Apollo Inc., under
contract for the Broadmoor Area TIF - Broadmoor/Burns Intersection Project.
Resolution No. 4629 - Supplement to Professional Services Agreement with
HLA Engineering and Surveying, Inc for the Ainsworth Avenue Pavement
Preservation Project
To approve Resolution No. 4629, authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute
Supplement No. 1 for the Professional Services Agreement with HLA Engineering
and Land Surveying, Inc. for the Ainsworth Avenue Pavement Preservation
project.
Resolution No. 4630 - Professional Services Agreement with MacKay
Sposito for the Lewis Street Pavement Preservation Project
To approve Resolution No. 4630, authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute
a Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant
Agreement with MacKay Sposito, LLC for the Lewis Street Pavement
Preservation Project.
Resolutions Nos. 4631 & 4632 - Approving two (2) Developer
Reimbursement Agreements for the Construction of Street Improvements
on Road 104 and Road 108 with RP Development, LLC
To approve Resolution No. 4631, authorizing a Street System Developer
Reimbursement (Latecomer) Agreement with RP Development, LLC for the
construction of Street Improvements of Road 104.
To approve Resolution No. 4632, authorizing a Street System Developer
Reimbursement (Latecomer) Agreement with RP Development, LLC for the
construction of Street Improvements of Road 108.
Resolution No. 4633 - Agreement with Natural Selection Farms, Inc. for the
Beneficial Use of Biosolids
To approve Resolution No. 4633, waiving the competitive bidding requirements
and approving the Agreement with Natural Selection Farms, Inc. for the beneficial
use of biosolids.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel
Page 3 of 8Page 9 of 276
to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call vote. 6-0
AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember
Grimm, and Councilmember Perales
ABSENT: Councilmember Harpster
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Laurie Thompson, Pasco resident, commented on recreational and illegal
fireworks. She suggested that only legal fireworks be allowed in Pasco and lit in
designated areas.
Amber Waid, Pasco resident, expressed support for continuing fluoridation in the
water system.
Mary Mahoney, Pasco resident, commented on the City Capital Improvement
Projects (CIP) budget, salaries of the City Attorney, Interim City Manager, and
Pasco Public Facilities District (PPFD) Executive Director, PPFD aquatics facility
project, building a homeless shelter, animal control topics, bald eagles, and a past
LID in her neighborhood.
Thomas Granbois, Pasco resident and downtown Pasco business owner,
commented on new businesses and current happenings in downtown Pasco.
REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS
Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
Ms. Blasdel reported on the Pasco Police Family Field Day, held on Saturday,
August 2nd.
Second Quarter Financial Report (April 2025 - June 2025)
Ms. Garcia presented the 2025 Second Quarter Financial Report.
Mr. Grimm commented on how the Police Department is reducing overtime with
its staff.
Mr. Perales asked about the loan proceeds under the Utilities Budget, mid-
biennial budget adjustment, possible ambulance/false alarm fees and the lower
gambling revenue. Ms. Garcia and Ms. Serra responded.
Mayor Serrano asked about the current status of the City's reserve funds and Ms.
Garcia and Ms. Sigdel responded.
Page 4 of 8Page 10 of 276
HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
RELATING THERETO
Public Hearing and Ordinance No. 4780 - Wright and Big Sky Developers
Glacier Park Annexation (ANX 2024-003)
Ms. Miller provided a brief report on the proposed annexation.
Mayor Serrano declared the Public Hearing open to consider the proposed
annexation.
Following three calls for comments, and there being none, Mayor Serrano
declared the Public Hearing closed.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel
to adopt Ordinance No. 4780, relating to annexation and annexing certain real
property to the City of Pasco, and further, authorize publication by summary
only.
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember
Grimm, and Councilmember Perales
ABSENT: Councilmember Harpster
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS
Ordinance No. 4781 - Wright and Big Sky Developers Glacier Park - Zoning
Determination of Annexed Property (ZD 2024-003)
Mayor Serrano announced that the zoning determination was a quasi-judicial
action and asked Mr. Ferguson to explain the procedure for quasi-judicial items.
Mr. Ferguson read the quasi-judicial procedure including how the Appearance of
Fairness Doctrine applies to it. Next, he asked all Councilmembers a series of
questions associated with potential conflicts of interest to disclose such potential
conflicts or appearance of conflicts. With no response from the Councilmembers,
he asked if any members of the public were seeking to disqualify a member of
Council from participating in the proceedings. No one came forward.
Ms. Miller provided a brief report on the proposed zoning designation for the
recently annexed property.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel
to adopt Ordinance No. 4781, assigning R-1 Low Density Residential District to
the Wright and Big Sky Developers Glacier Park annexation area, as
recommended by the Hearing Examiner and, further, authorize publication by
summary only.
Page 5 of 8Page 11 of 276
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember
Grimm, and Councilmember Perales
ABSENT: Councilmember Harpster
Resolution No. 4634 - Setting a Public Hearing to Consider a Text Code
Amendment to the Pasco Municipal Code Section 25.85.020 Related to Car
Washes
Ms. Miller provided a brief report on the proposed public hearing for a text
amendment in the Pasco Municipal Code related to car wash facilities in the C-1
zoning district.
Mr. Grimm and Mayor Serrano expressed appreciation to Ms. Miller.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel
to adopt Resolution No. 4634, Setting 7:00 PM, September 2, 2025, as the
time and date for a Public Hearing to consider a text code amendment to the
Pasco Municipal Code Section 25.85.020 related to car washes.
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember
Grimm, and Councilmember Perales
ABSENT: Councilmember Harpster
NEW BUSINESS
Presentation Related to the Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP)
Vision Zero Goal
Ms. Serra introduced Veronica Sullivan, Project Manager, DKS Associates,
Andrey Avetisyan, Engineering Manager and Faigda Garcia, Engineer I.
Ms. Sullivan presented the CSAP Vision Zero goal of first reducing and then
eliminating fatal and serious traffic accidents within the City and asked for
Council's recommendation.
Mr. Grimm commented on the fatalities in Pasco's downtown area.
Mr. Perales favor to reduce roadway fatalities and serious injuries (FSI) to zero by
2040.
Mayor Serrano, Mr. Grimm and Mayor Pro Tem Milne indicated that they desire to
eliminate FSI to zero; however, that may not be achievable by 2040. Therefore,
they were in favor to reduce roadway fatalities and serious injuries to 50 percent
Page 6 of 8Page 12 of 276
by 2040 unless that grant funding opportunities would be served best by Pasco's
Commitment Goad for 50 percent by 2040.
*Resolution Nos. 4635 and 4636 - Approval for Applications to Public Works
Board for Construction Funding for Butterfield WTP Improvements and
Lewis Street Underpass Demolition Project
Ms. Serra provided a brief report on the Public Works Board (PWB) low interest
loans and the process to apply for these loans. She asked for Council's support in
applying for two loans.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel
to approve Resolution No. 4635, authorizing the submittal of a Public Works
Board loan application for the Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Improvements
Project.
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember
Grimm, and Councilmember Perales
ABSENT: Councilmember Harpster
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel
to approve Resolution No. 4636, authorizing the submittal of a Public Works
Board loan application for the Lewis Street Underpass Demolition Project.
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember
Grimm, and Councilmember Perales
ABSENT: Councilmember Harpster
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Council adjourned into Executive Session at 8:49 PM for 5 minutes returning at
8:54 PM to review the performance of a public employee per RCW
42.30.110(1)(g) with the City Manager and City Attorney.
Mayor Serrano noted that there will be final action after the Executive Session
concludes.
Mayor Serrano called the meeting back to order at 8:54 PM.
MOTION: Mayor Serrano moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Milne to direct
the Interim City Manager to direct the City Attorney to revise the incoming City
Manager's contract through an amendment to the contract to allow him up to
40 hours of administrative leave to use by the end of the year and authorize the
Interim City Manager to sign said amendment.
Page 7 of 8Page 13 of 276
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember
Grimm, and Councilmember Perales
ABSENT: Councilmember Harpster
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:55 PM.
PASSED and APPROVED on _______________________.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
David Milne, Mayor Pro Tem Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 8 of 8Page 14 of 276
MINUTES
City Council Special Meeting
5:30 PM - Monday, August 11, 2025
Pasco City Hall, Washington Conference Room
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 5:32 PM by David Milne, Mayor Pro Tem
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: David Milne, Blanche Barajas, Charles Grimm, Peter
Harpster, and Leo Perales
Councilmembers attending remotely: None
Councilmembers absent: Melissa Blasdel
Staff present: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City
Manager; Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager; Griselda Garcia, Interim
Finance Director; and Scott Mihalik, Assistant City Attorney
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
Budget and Policy Direction
Council and staff discussed the City's budget.
Council provided direction to staff related to budget planning.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:50 PM.
PASSED and APPROVED on _______________________.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
David Milne, Mayor Pro Tem Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 1 of 1Page 15 of 276
MINUTES
City Council Workshop Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, August 11, 2025
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by David Milne, Mayor Pro Tem.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: David Milne, Blanche Barajas, Charles Grimm, Peter
Harpster, and Leo Perales
Councilmembers attending remotely: None
Councilmembers absent: Melissa Blasdel
Staff present: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager; Angela Pashon, Assistant City
Manager; Griselda Garcia, Interim Finance Director; Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief;
Scott Mihalik, Assistant City Attorney; Haylie Miller, Community & Economic
Develop Director; Jesse Rice, Parks & Recreation Director; Ken Roske, Police
Chief; Maria Serra, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
Mayor Pro Tem Milne announced Pete Serrano's resignation from City Council
effective on August 10, 2025, as Mr. Serrano accepted the appointment as Interim
U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Washington. He expressed thanks for Mr.
Serrano's time on City Council and wished him success in his new endeavors.
Mr. Grimm reported on a recent Columbia Valley Recovery Center tour and
National Night Out event.
Mr. Perales reported on National Night Out event and touring the Columbia Valley
Recovery Center construction site, Lastly, he attended Goodwill's employee
appreciation dinner.
Page 1 of 3Page 16 of 276
Ms. Barajas reported on National Night Out event and the recent Benton-Franklin
Department of Health's Homelessness listening session. She commented on
Service Peace Warriors - Service Dogs for veterans and first responders in the
Pacific Northwest.
Mayor Pro Tem Milne reported on the National Night Out event. He expressed an
apology to those that attended the first Listening Session for Fluoride in the City's
drinking water as he was at another event. He attended the Columbia Valley
Recovery Center and the Pasco Chamber of Commerce lunch meeting.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Carryover Funds for Capital Projects from 2023-2024 Biennium
Ms. Garcia provided a brief report on the 2023-2024 Biennial Capital Projects
Budget funds carryover.
Mayor Pro Tem Milne called for public comments three (3) times and no one
came forward to speak.
2 Resolutions - Change Order No. 11 Process Water Reuse Facility Phase 2
Construction Contract with Tapani & RH2 Engineering PSA Amendment 7
Ms. Serra provided a brief report on the need for the approval of the Process
Water Reuse Facility (PWRF) Phase 2 construction contract Change Order No.
11 with Tapani, Inc., as well as a 7th Amendment to RHS Engineering
Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for the PWRF Phase 2 for additional
construction management services.
Mayor Pro Tem Milne called for public comments three (3) times and no one
came forward to speak.
MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION
Mr. Zabell announced that his term as Interim City Manager is coming to a close
and expressed appreciation to Council and staff during this past six months as he
served as the City's Interim City Manager.
Mayor Pro Tem Milne expressed appreciation for everything Mr. Zabell has done
during this short period.
Mr. Harpster expressed his gratitude to Mr. Zabell for the work that was
accomplished during his time as Interim City Manager.
ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 of 3Page 17 of 276
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:20 PM.
PASSED and APPROVED on _______________________.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
David Milne, Mayor Pro Tem Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 3 of 3Page 18 of 276
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 14, 2025
TO: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 8/18/25
FROM: Griselda Garcia, Interim Director
Finance
SUBJECT: Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of
$4,648,953.92
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Accounts Payable 07.31.25 to 08.13.25
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve claims in the total amount of $4,648,953.92 ($1,797,717.45 in
Check Nos. 273028 - 273280; $1,482,281.02 in Electronic Transfer Nos.
850703, 850715 - 850716, 850719 - 850720, 850790 - 850795, 850797 -
850798; $21,136.03 in Check Nos. 55031 - 55054; $1,343,352.87 in Electronic
Transfer Nos. 30229387 - 30230081;$1,930.55 in Electronic Transfer Nos.
1027 - 1028 ;$2,536.00 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 359 - 361).
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 19 of 276
REPORTING PERIOD:
August 18, 2025
Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'l Bank Electronic Bank Combined
Check Numbers 273028 - 273280 55031 - 55054
Total Check Amount $1,797,717.45 $21,136.03 Total Checks 1,818,853.48$
Electronic Transfer Numbers 850703 30229387 - 30230081 1027 - 1028 359 - 361
850715 - 850716
850719 - 850720
850790 - 850795
850797 - 850798
Total EFT Amount $1,482,281.02 $1,343,352.87 $1,930.55 $2,536.00 Total EFTs 2,830,100.44$
Grand Total 4,648,953.92$
Councilmember B
100 884,747.29
110 18,877.63
140 281.37
142 395.00
145 1,383.86
150 44,297.49
160 3,760.01
165 4,060.00
168 29,420.82
170 995.53
180 3,819.06
185 1,505.98
190 19.00
194 9,159.31
195 4,221.92
196 HOTEL/ MOTEL EXCISE TAX 18,466.14
367 175,779.62
410 505,794.13
510 28,220.49
520 12,640.50
630 3,633.45
690 2,897,475.32
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS:4,648,953.92$
July 31 to August 13, 2025
C I T Y O F P A S C O
Council Meeting of:
Accounts Payable Approved
The City Council
City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington
We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed
as described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such
Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager Griselda Garcia, Finance Manager
We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this
Eighteenth day of August, 2025 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment:
C.D. BLOCK GRANT
HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT
MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER
AMBULANCE SERVICE
Councilmember A
SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND:
GENERAL FUND
STREET
RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN
REVOLVING ABATEMENT
CEMETERY
ATHLETIC PROGRAMS
ANIMAL CONTROL
SENIOR CENTER OPERATING
MULTI-MODAL FACILITY
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL
MEDICAL/ DENTAL/ VISION INSURANCE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STADIUM/ CONVENTION CENTER
GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
UTILITY, WATER/ SEWER
FLEX
PAYROLL CLEARING
Page 20 of 276
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 12, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 8/18/25
FROM: Maria Serra, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4637 Change Order No. 11 Process Water Reuse
Facility Phase 2 Construction Contract with Tapani and Resolution No.
4638 RH2 Engineering PSA Amendment 7
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution - PWRF Phase 2 Change Order No. 11
Exhibit A - Change Order No. 11
Resolution - PSA Amendment No. 7
RH2 - PWRF Improvements (Winter Storage) PSA (#21-039) - Amendment No.
7
Exhibit A - Amend No. 7 PWFR PH2
Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No 4637, authorizing the City
Manager to execute Change Order No. 11 with Tapani, Inc. for the Process
Water Reuse Facility Phase 2: Winter Storage Improvements Project.
-and-
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4638, authorizing the City
Manager Services Professional the for execute No. Amendment to 7
Agreement with RH2 Engineering, Inc. for the Process Water Reuse Facility
(PWRF) Pretreatment Improvement Phase 2: Winter Storage.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
This project is funded 100% by a Department of Ecology Clean Water State
Revolving Fund (CWSRF) low-interest loan.
This report includes two items, with total fiscal impact of $323,385.01. They are
as follows:
Page 21 of 276
a. Proposed Construction Contract Change Order No. 11 with Tapani, Inc.
for PWRF Phase 2 $85,531.01
Engineer's Construction Estimate $45,488,837.00
Awarded Construction Contract Amount $31,588,246.92
Previously Approved Change Orders No. 1-10 $1,431,338.81
Proposed Change Order No. 11 $85,531.01
New Contract Amount $33,105,116.74
b. Proposed Amendment No. 7 to Professional Services Agreement (PSA)
with RH2 for PWRF Phase 2: $237,854.00
Summary:
Original PSA $422,542.00
Amendment No. 1 $267,625.00
Amendment No. 2 $9,038.00
Amendment No. 3 $111,584.00
Amendment No. 4 $1,364,811.00
Amendment No. 5 $1,357,001.00
Amendment No. 6 $0.00
Proposed Amendment No. 7 $237,854.00
New PSA Total $3,770,455.00
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Storage Winter 2 Phase (PWRF) Facility Reuse Water Process The
Improvements project began with the City of Pasco entering into a Professional
Services Agreement (PSA) with RH2 Engineering, Inc. in August 2021 to
design 200 million gallons of winter storage ponds. The scope later expanded
to over 300 million gallons to accommodate existing processors' future growth,
prompting multiple contract amendments for environmental permitting, land
acquisition, agencies. regulatory state and with coordination and federal
Amendments 1 through 6 addressed needs ranging from NEPA compliance to
dam safety requirements, and extended construction support through 2025.
The project is being fully funded through a State Revolving Fund (SRF) low-
interest loan administered by the Washington State Department of Ecology and
authorized under Resolution No. 4425. As a Designated Equivalency Project
(DEP), it is subject to federal requirements for labor documentation, reporting,
and contractor payroll verification, adding layers of complexity to project
oversight and coordination.
The construction contract was awarded to Tapani, Inc. on September 11, 2023,
with work now approximately 98% complete. Change Order No. 11 with
Page 22 of 276
Tapani, Inc is proposed to address field conditions discovered during
construction. This includes removal of 620 feet of abandoned PVC pipe, added
corrosion protection features, a new lift station control panel for integration with
existing and power for installations components facility the at conduit
communication to control gates. These changes improve system functionality
and durability while aligning with Ecology’s regulatory requirements. The total
cost of Change Order No. 11 is $85,531.01 (including tax), tracked on a Time
and Materials (T&M) basis.
The proposed Amendment No. 7 to RH2 Professional services agreement
includes and inspections, onsite construction additional administration,
expanded coordination responsibilities to ensure regulatory compliance. It also
provides engineering support for well drilling operations and additional
coordination with Burnham accommodating the PRRC startup timeline. With
Amendment 7 is proposed as not to exceed $237,854.00.
Prior amendments to the PSA (1 through 6) addressed various evolving project
needs. These included added environmental permitting for land acquisition
(Amendment 1), preparation of an Environmental Site Assessment required by
the US Bureau of Reclamation (Amendment 2), additional permitting to comply
with federal funding and NEPA requirements for an expanded disposal site
(Amendment 3), and engineering services to address Dam Safety regulations
and coordination with other ongoing construction phases (Amendment 4).
Amendments 5 and 6 provided for extended construction support services,
contract administration, and regulatory compliance, with Amendment 6
extending RH2's services through the end of 2025 without a change in scope
or cost.
Both the proposed amendment and change order can be accommodated within
the existing project budget.
V. DISCUSSION:
These items were presented to Council at the August 11, 2025, Workshop.
City Staff has reviewed and negotiated these items.
Staff recommends approval of CO No. 11 to the construction contract with
Tapani, Inc. in the amount of $85,531.01 for the PWRF - Phase 2 Winter
Storage Improvements project.
City Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 7 to the PSA with RH2
Engineering for the PWRF Pretreatment Improvements Phase 2 project in the
amount of $237,854.00.
Page 23 of 276
Resolution – PWRF PH 2 Project CO No. 11 - 1
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CHANGE
ORDER NO. 11 WITH TAPANI, INC., FOR THE PROCESS WATER REUSE
FACILITY PHASE 2 WINTER STORAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) and Tapani, Inc., entered into a Construction
Contract on September 11, 2023, for construction of the Process Water Reuse Facility (PWRF)
Phase 2 Improvements; and
WHEREAS, previously approved Change Orders No. 1, 4, 7, 8 and 10 were under the
authority provided to the City Manager and Public Works Director; and
WHEREAS, previously approved Change Orders No. 2, 3, 5, 6 and 9 were under the
authority provided to the City Manager via Council adoption of Resolution Nos. 4433, 4441, 4493,
4561, and 4598 respectively; and
WHEREAS, the $85,531.01 amount of Change Order No. 11 added to the cumulative sum
of previously approved Change Orders exceeds the City Manager’s authority, and thus determined
to obtain Council approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into Change Order (CO)
No. 11 with Tapani, Inc.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of CO No.
11 between the City of Pasco and Tapani, Inc., as attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the Interim City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington
is hereby authorized to execute said CO No. 11 on behalf of the City of Pasco.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 24 of 276
Resolution – PWRF PH 2 Project CO No. 11 - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
David Milne
Interim Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 25 of 276
Page 26 of 276
Page 27 of 276
Date:1/15/2025
Project Name:PWRF Phase 2
Contract #
Job #242001
C.O. #CPR TBD
Description: Pipe Removal in 123 MG Lagoon Embankment.
Hours Rate Hours Rate
Foreman 6 77.60$ 116.41$ HRS 465.63$
Backhoe (45,000 Gw & Under) 8 75.74$ 113.61$ HRS 605.92$
Backhoe (45,000 Gw To 110,000 Gw) 6 76.09$ 114.14$ HRS 456.56$
Loader Operator (front-end & Overhead, 4 Yds. Incl. 8 Yds.) 7 76.09$ 114.14$ HRS 532.65$
Pipelayer 12 67.35$ 101.03$ HRS 808.25$
Labor Sub Total 2,869.01$
Labor Overhead & Profit 15%430.35$
Sick Leave 0%-$
Labor Total 3,299.36$
Equipment #Equipment Description Units Rate Unit Total
5040187 Crew Truck 6 47.37$ HRS 284.22$
1101149 Caterpillar 303.5E2 CR Excavator 8 62.49$ HRS 499.92$
1145181 Caterpillar 349F Excavator 6 242.78$ HRS 1,456.68$
1530055 Caterpillar 938M Loader 7 78.16$ HRS 547.12$
Equipment Sub Total 2,787.94$
Equipment Overhead & Profit 15%418.19$
Equipment Total 3,206.13$
Unit Rate Quantity Unit Total
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Material Sub Total -$
Material Overhead & Profit 15%-$
Material Total -$
Unit Rate Quantity Unit Total
-$
-$
-$
-$
Sub Contractors Sub Total -$
Subcontractor Overhead & Profit 15%-$
Subcontractor Total -$
Unit Rate Quantity Unit Total
1,500.00$ 1 LS 1,500.00$
-$
-$
-$
Other Sub Total 1,500.00$
Other Overhead & Profit 15%225.00$
Stipulations Other Total 1,725.00$
Sub Total 8,230.49$
Accepted by:General Liability Insurance 0.0000%-$
Bond 0.0% -$
Date:Total Amount 8,230.49$
This Change increases the time to complete the project by: Day(s)
This proposal is based on the usual cost elements such as labor, material, and normal markups and does not include all costs for additional changes
in the sequence of work, delays, disruptions, rescheduling, extended overhead, overtime (unless specified), acceleration, and/or impact costs; and
the right is expressly reserved to make claim for any and all (if any) of these related items prior to final completion of this contract. Please consider
this language official "notice" as defined in subcontract and/or main contract.
OTHER
Description
Disposal Cost - Average Rolloff Cost, No Invoice Yet
MATERIAL
Material Description
SUBCONTRACTORS
Subcontractor Description
Total
EQUIPMENT
Class Name/Description
Straight Time Overtime
Unit
Force Account/ Change Order Worksheet
This force account covers the removal of 620' of 6" PVC in the acnhor trench of the 123 MG lagoon.
LABOR
Corporate Office
PO Box 1900
Battle Ground, WA 98604
360.687.1148
Page 28 of 276
Page 29 of 276
Page 30 of 276
Page 31 of 276
Page 32 of 276
Page 33 of 276
Page 34 of 276
Page 35 of 276
Page 36 of 276
Page 37 of 276
Pa
g
e
3
8
o
f
2
7
6
KC
P
JM
C
Ap
r
2
4
,
2
0
2
5
Ap
r
2
5
,
2
0
2
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
21
-
0
2
3
6
PW
R
F
2
-
D
-
S
T
R
P
1
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
S03 119 170
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
EF
F
L
U
E
N
T
S
P
L
I
T
T
E
R
B
O
X
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
PW
R
F
P
H
A
S
E
2
:
W
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
OBLIQUE
SECTION A
A
CL
CL
CL
A CL
549.50'
TOP OF
FOUNDATION
PLAN VIEW
KC
P
JM
C
Ap
r
2
4
,
2
0
2
5
Ap
r
2
5
,
2
0
2
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
21
-
0
2
3
6
PW
R
F
2
-
D
-
S
T
R
P
1
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
S03 119 170
556.00'
FINAL GRADE
1'-0" TYP. FULL PERIMETER
8'-6"
25'-0"8'-0"
4'-6"
7'-0"
4'-6"
6" TYP. FULL PERIMETER
16'-0"
7'-0"
36'-0"
1'-0"
6"
1-1 2"
3"3"10"10"10"
OPENING + 6"
12"
2"6
12
2-1 2"
2-1 2"
1"
1"
WEIR BLADE DETAILS 501
3'-0", TYP.
8'-0" TYP.
1'-0",
TYP.
557.49'
TOP OF WALL
562.00'
TOP OF WALL
550.00'
I.E.
550.50'
I.E. (TYP OF 2)
557.70'
WEIR
3A
8'-6"
CL
501
CL
VERTICAL BAR DETAIL 1 1
MIN LAP
CO
N
T
CO
N
T
48"
#5 #5 #5
6"6"
1
CL6'-0"
504
505
4'-10", MIN.
502
503
301
3
3
SEE DWG NO. C111 FOR STRUCTURE CORNER POINTS
551.50'
I.E.
316 SS WEIR
BLADE, 1/4" THICK
1/8"
301
302
302
1
06
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
3
AD
D
E
N
D
U
M
N
O
.
1
TB
C
KR
S
10
09
/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
CO
N
F
O
R
M
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
EA
R
KR
S
3'-6"
1
34
04
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
5
CH
A
N
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
N
O
.
3
3
.
1
TB
C
KR
S
4'-0"
502
INLET
OUTLET,
TYP. OF 3
GALV. STEEL
GRATING 19-W-4
WITH 2-1/2" X 3/16"
BEARING BARS
(WEIGHS 17.2 PSF),
9'-0" SPANNING E-W
DIRECTION, TYP.
30" SLIDE GATE,
TYP. OF 2
WEIR BLADE, TYP.
30"
SLIPMETER
BEAM TO
CONCRETE WALL
CONNECTION, TYP.
6" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE
COURSE. COMPACT TO FIRM AND
UNYIELDING CONDITION.
1" HOLES, TYP. REMOVE
BURRS
5 8" x 8" ANCHOR
BOLT
5 8" CUT WASHERS
1" AIR VENT PIPE
#5 @ 12" O.C., E.F., E.W.,
TYP. ALL WALLS U.N.O.
6" AIR VENT,
TYP OF 3
CONNECTION TO ESB
W8x24 GRATING
SUPPORT BEAM,
TYP.
W8x24 GRATING
SUPPORT BEAM,
TYP.
W8x24 GRATING
SUPPORT BEAM,
TYP.
TOP OF
FOUNDATION
SLAB
STD HOOKADD'L O.F. VERTS PER VERTICAL REBAR
DETAIL 1 FOR NORTH AND SOUTH
EXTERIOR WALLS, TYP.
LADDER ACCESS, TYP.
GUARDRAIL,
CENTER OF
WALL, TYP.
TOP OF INTERIOR WALL
LOWERED FOR GRATING
TO RUN ACROSS TOP OF
WALL, TYP.
#5 @ 12" O.C., T&B
LONGITUDINAL BARS VAPOR BARRIER
CONNECTION TO ESB
PIPE PENETRATION,
TYP.
EMBANKMENT FILL, 8" MAX
LIFTS COMPACTED TO 95%
MAX DRY DENSITY
#5 @ 12" O.C., TYP.
TRANSVERSE BARS
#5 @ 6" O.C., BOT
TRANSVERSE BARS
FLOW
WEIR CREST
1/8" CHAMFER
ON SIDES AND
CREST OF
WEIR PLATE
4" WIDE NUMBERED
FIBERGLASS STAFF GAUGE,
CRAIN OR EQUAL, TYP. OF 2
WALL OPENING RST,
TYP.
CONCRETE CORNER
RST, TYP.
CONCRETE
INTERSECTION RST,
TYP.
GRATING SUPPORT BEAM
NOTCH GRATING AS NECESSARY TO
ACOMODATE SINGLE ANODE
INSTALLATION. NOTCHED AREA TO
INCLUDE BANDING OF SAME MATERIAL
AS GRATING, TYP. OF 4
5
8" THREADED EPOXY ANCHOR BOLT.
PLACE 6" FROM OUTER EDGE, TYP. OF 4
ANODE JUNCTION BOX, MOUNT
TO RAILING, TYP. OF 2
ANODE TYP. OF 8
ANODE , TYP. OF 81
1
1
4"
1"
Pa
g
e
3
9
o
f
2
7
6
TB
C
JM
C
Ap
r
2
5
,
2
0
2
5
Ap
r
2
5
,
2
0
2
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
21
-
0
2
3
6
PW
R
F
2
-
D
-
S
T
R
P
7
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
S06 122 170
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
LA
G
O
O
N
O
U
T
L
E
T
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
PW
R
F
P
H
A
S
E
2
:
W
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
LAGOON OUTLET STRUCTURE PLAN
LAGOON OUTLET
STRUCTURE SECTION
A
A
A
CL
556.00'
TOP OF WALL
INTAKE ELEVATIONS & DIMENSIONS
POND SLIPMETER OR
SLIDE GATE?
PIPE INVERT
ELEVATION FINISHED FLOOR A B C D E WALL CONNECTION
DETAIL
2'-0",
TYP.A
C
2'-6"
6"
2'-6"
1'-0"
VARIES
E
2
6" SLAB
EXTENSION,
TYP.
TOP OF
FOUNDATION
VARIES
6'-10",
TYP.
2'-0" FOOTING EXTENSION,
TYP. ALL SIDES
1'-0" TYP, FOR ALL
SLOPE INTAKE WALLS
B
FINISHED FLOOR
SEE TABLE
PIPE INVERT
SEE TABLE
12'-0",
TYP.
D
SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR
STRUCTURE CORNER POINTS
3
1'-0",
TYP.
1
06
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
3
AD
D
E
N
D
U
M
N
O
.
1
TB
C
KR
S
2'-0"
3
06
/
2
9
/
2
0
2
3
AD
D
E
N
D
U
M
N
O
.
3
TD
T
JM
C
4
07
/
1
2
/
2
0
2
3
AD
D
E
N
D
U
M
N
O
.
4
TD
T
JM
C
10
09
/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
CO
N
F
O
R
M
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
EA
R
KR
S
12 11/10/2023 CHANGE PROPOSAL REQUEST NO. 3 TBC JMC
7
7
11 11/08/2023 CHANGE PROPOSAL REQUEST NO. 1.1 KRS
42" SLIDE GATE
TRASH RACK,
TYP. OF 2
EMBANKMENT FILL, 8"
MAX LIFTS COMPACTED
TO 95% MAX DRY DENSITY
Dx8" AIR VENT,
SEE TABLE
#5 @ 6" O.C., E.F., TYP.
#5 @ 12" O.C., E.F., E.W.,
O.F. VERTS, TYP.,
ALL SLOPED WALLS
(REBAR NOT SHOWN)
#5 @ 6" O.C., E.F., @
ENDS OF WALL BUNDLE
(2) #5 E.F., TYP.
BRIDGE ABUTMENT
SLIPMETER WHERE
REQUIRED. SEE TABLE.
SLIDEGATE WHERE
REQUIRED. SEE TABLE.
6" CRUSHED SURFACING
BASE COURSE. COMPACT
TO FIRM AND UNYIELDING
CONDITION.
#5 @ 12" O.C., T&B, E.W., TYP.
6" FILLET
POLYETHYLENE
SHEETING,
SECURE TOP EDGE
WITH POND LINER
BATTEN STRIP
8" WIDE FRP STAFF GAUGE
FROM EMBANKMENT TO TOP
OF ABUTMENT, VPC
FIBERGLASS OR EQUAL, TYP
OF 4
GRADE VARIES FOR
123 MG OUTLET
12"x8" END SILL ON
123 MG LAGOON
OUTLET ONLY
(2) #5 HORZ. BARS
CENTERED IN SILL
#5 @ 12" O.C.
CENTERED IN SILL
12"x8" END SILL ON THE 123
MG LAGOON OUTLET ONLY
6" MIN
HOOK
LENGTH
(2) #5 HOOKED
WITH HORIZONTAL
BARS IN SILL, TYP.
ANODE TYP. OF 3, MOUNT
ANCHOR HORIZONTAL,
PERPENDICULAR TO
WALL. MOUNT JUNCTION
BOX TO BRIDGE HANDRAIL
AT CITY APPROVED
LOCATION.
34 4/25/2025 CHANGE PROPOSAL REQUEST NO. 33.1 TBC KRS
1
Pa
g
e
4
0
o
f
2
7
6
KC
P
JM
C
Ap
r
2
5
,
2
0
2
5
Ap
r
2
5
,
2
0
2
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
21
-
0
2
3
6
PW
R
F
2
-
D
-
S
T
R
P
2
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
S07 123 170
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
DR
A
I
N
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
B
O
X
CL
AA
SECTION A
557.00'
TOP OF BOX
556.00'
FINAL GRADE
DRAIN CONTROL BOX ELEVATIONS
POND PIPE INLET INVERT PIPE OUTLET FINISHED FLOOR
4B
301
503
SEE TABLE
FINISHED FLOOR
SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR
STRUCTURE CORNER POINTS
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
PW
R
F
P
H
A
S
E
2
:
W
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
302
301
1
06
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
3
AD
D
E
N
D
U
M
N
O
.
1
TB
C
KR
S
10
09
/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
CO
N
F
O
R
M
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
EA
R
KR
S
PLAN VIEW
12
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
3
CH
A
N
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
N
O
.
3
TB
C
JC
SLIPMETER ANODE MOUNTING LOCATION 3
34
04
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
5
CH
A
N
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
N
O
.
3
3
.
1
TB
C
KR
S
18'-8"
14'-8"13'-8"
14'-0"
6" TYP. FULL
PERIMETER
1'-10" TYP.
FULL
PERIMETER
17'-8"
5'-0"
5'-0"
1'-0"1'-0"
4'-0"
EMBANKMENT FILL, 8" MAX
LIFTS COMPACTED TO 95%
MAX DRY DENSITY
42" SLIPMETER
6" CRUSHED SURFACING
BASE COURSE. COMPACT
TO FIRM AND UNYIELDING
CONDITION.
#5 @ 6" O.C., E.F.,
E.W., HORZ. BARS
OUTSIDE LAYER TYP.,
ALL WALLS
8" AIR VENT
GALV. STEEL GRATING 19-W-4
WITH 2-1/2" X 3/16" BEARING
BARS (WEIGHS 17.2 PSF), 9'-0"
SPANNING E-W DIRECTION, TYP.
#5 @ 12" O.C., T&B, E.W.VAPOR BARRIER
PIPE PENETRATION, TYP.
3" CLR, TYP.
3" CLR, TYP.
3" CLR, TYP.
CONCRETE CORNER
RST, TYP.
WALL OPENING RST,
TYP.
JUNCTION BOX W/ UNISTRUT
SUPPORT, MOUNT TO CONCRETE
5
8" EPOXY ANCHOR BOLT.
PLACE 6" FROM OUTER EDGE
NOTCH GRATING AS NECESSARY TO
ACCOMMODATE SINGLE ANODE
INSTALLATION. NOTCHED AREA TO INCLUDE
BANDING OF SAME MATERIAL AS GRATING.
ANODE JUNCTION BOX DETAIL 1
JUNCTION BOX
(2) #6 AWG TO
SLIPMETER OR
SLIDE GATE
ANODE EQUAL TO GALVOTEC
MODEL GA-MG-P-50C. SEE
TABLE FOR ELEVATION
5
16" SS WELDED LINK CHAIN TO
ANODES. ATTACH TO EPOXY
ANCHOR AND ANODE WITH
SS SHACKLE
5
8" THREADED EPOXY ANCHOR BOLT,
EXTEND 6" MIN. FROM TOP OF
WALL. ATTACH WASHER AND
LOCKING NUT TO SECURE SHACKLE.
(2) #6 AWG ANODE WIRE, TYP.
ANODE DROP, TYP. OF 3
CABLE CLIP
EYE BOLT
ATTACH ANODES TO TOP BEAM
BOLT SIDE COVER WITH RING
TERMINAL. COVER WITH HANDY
CAP IP EXOTHERMIC WELD PATCH.
SLIDE GATE ANODE MOUNTING LOCATION 2
3
2
1
1
0.1 OHM, 2 AMP SHUNT, TYP.
ATTACH ANODES TO TOP FRAME
BOLT WITH RING TERMINAL.
COVER WITH HANDY CAP IP
EXOTHERMIC WELD PATCH.
ANODE TYP.1
1" BUTYL MASTIC TAPE WITH
POLYPROPYLENE BACKING
EQUAL TO CAMO
ANODE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS
LOCATION EQUIPMENT NUMBER OF
ANODES
DISTANCE FROM FLOOR TO
BOTTOM OF ANODE
APPROX. CHAIN
LENGTHS
Pa
g
e
4
1
o
f
2
7
6
Page 42 of 276
Page 43 of 276
Page 44 of 276
Pa
g
e
4
5
o
f
2
7
6
Page 46 of 276
Date:4/21/2025
Project Name:PWRF Phase 2
Contract #
Job #242001
C.O. #CPR 34
Description: PLC Processor Modification
Hours Rate Hours Rate
Superintendent 2 78.78$ 118.17$ HRS 157.55$
Labor Sub Total 157.55$
Labor Overhead & Profit 15%23.63$
Sick Leave 0%-$
Labor Total 181.19$
Equipment #Equipment Description Units Rate Unit Total
5040187 Crew Truck 2 47.37$ HRS 94.74$
Equipment Sub Total 94.74$
Equipment Overhead & Profit 15%14.21$
Equipment Total 108.95$
Unit Rate Quantity Unit Total
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Material Sub Total -$
Material Overhead & Profit 15%-$
Material Total -$
Unit Rate Quantity Unit Total
12,801.76$ 1 LS 12,801.76$
-$
-$
-$
Sub Contractors Sub Total 12,801.76$
Subcontractor Overhead & Profit 15%1,920.26$
Subcontractor Total 14,722.02$
Unit Rate Quantity Unit Total
-$
-$
-$
-$
Other Sub Total -$
Other Overhead & Profit 15%-$
Stipulations Other Total -$
Sub Total 15,012.16$
Accepted by:General Liability Insurance 0.0000%
Bond 0.0%
Date:Total Amount 15,012.16$
This Change increases the time to complete the project by: Day(s)
Force Account/ Change Order Worksheet
Description
See the attached CPR.
This proposal is not protected from tariff price increases.
Material Description
LABOR
EQUIPMENT
MATERIAL
OTHER
Straight Time
This proposal is based on the usual cost elements such as labor, material, and normal markups and does not include all costs for additional changes in the sequence
of work, delays, disruptions, rescheduling, extended overhead, overtime (unless specified), acceleration, and/or impact costs; and the right is expressly reserved to
make claim for any and all (if any) of these related items prior to final completion of this contract. Please consider this language official "notice" as defined in
subcontract and/or main contract.
Overtime
Class Name/Description Unit Total
SUBCONTRACTORS
Subcontractor Description
Silverline
Corporate Office
PO Box 1900
Battle Ground, WA 98604
360.687.1148
Page 47 of 276
ESTIMATE
39709324
ESTIMATE DATE
Apr 18, 2025
J O B A D D R E S S
PWRF - Process Water Reuse Facility
957 East Foster Wells Road
Pasco, WA 99301 USA
Job:
E S T I M A T E D E T A I L S
CPR - 34 Change CPU: Per CPR-34, providing (2) 1769-L33ER, updating project documents.
CO PROPOSAL IS NOT PROTECTED FROM TARIFF PRICE INCREASES
SUB-TOTAL $12,801.76
1100 - FRANKLIN COUNTY 8.1%$0.00
TOTAL $12,801.76
Thank you for choosing Silverline Electric!
CUSTOMER AUTHORIZATION
I have the authority to order the above work and do so order as outlined above. It is agreed that the seller will retain title to
any equipment or material furnished until final and complete payment is made, and if settlement is not made as agreed, the
seller shall have the right to remove same and the seller will be held harmless for any damages resulting from the removal
thereof. In the event of non-payment of any amounts due, the undersigned agrees to pay reasonable interest on all
delinquent monies owed and in the event of collection agrees to pay all costs of collection including attorney fees. The
Service Provider is not responsible for any cosmetic, equipment or structural damage resulting from the repair or diagnosis
of the problem.
Silverline Electric LLC
4121 W Clearwater Ave
Kennewick, WA 99336
BILL TO
Tapani Inc.
1904 Southeast 6th Place # PO Box 1900
Battle Ground, WA 98604 USA
Sign here Date
Estimate #39709324 Page 1 of 1Page 48 of 276
SILVERLINE
BILLING BREAKDOWN FORM
Customer Name:Date:4/18/2025
Billing Address:
Job Description:
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
2 $4,245.00 $8,490.00
1 $75.00 $75.00
2 $141.00 $282.00
2 $131.00 $262.00
2 $123.00 $246.00
10 $111.00 $1,110.00
486 $0.90 $437.40
$10,902.40
15%$12,537.76
$264.00
SUBTOTAL $12,801.76
TAX
TOTAL
Added Taurus cost
1769-L33ER CPUs (1 will be a spare)
Shipping
CAD updates
Clerical (O&M, ordering)
Mobilization
Mileage
ADMIN
MATERIAL TOTAL W/ MARK UP
PWRF - CPR 34
MATERIALS USED
Engineering review:
LABOR
MATERIAL
MATERIAL SUBTOTAL
Page 49 of 276
TJ
W
CC
A
Ap
r
1
5
,
2
0
2
5
Ap
r
1
5
,
2
0
2
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
21
-
0
2
3
6
PW
R
F
2
-
D
-
E
1
3
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
E26 156 170
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
LI
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
P
O
W
E
R
L
A
Y
O
U
T
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
PW
R
F
P
H
A
S
E
2
:
W
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
LIFT STATION CONTROL PANEL POWER LAYOUT
VFD
RJ45
ETHERNET SWITCH
RJ45 RJ45 RJ45 RJ45
RJ45 RJ45 RJ45RJ45
FIBER FIBER
RJ45RJ45
CO
M
P
A
C
T
L
O
G
I
X
5
3
7
0
L
3
MO
D
E
L
N
O
.
1
7
6
9
-
L
3
3
E
R
16
P
T
D
I
G
I
T
A
L
I
N
P
U
T
M
O
D
U
L
E
MO
D
E
L
N
O
.
1
7
6
9
-
I
Q
1
6
8
P
T
R
E
L
A
Y
O
U
T
P
U
T
M
O
D
U
L
E
MO
D
E
L
N
O
.
1
7
6
9
-
O
W
8
4
P
T
A
N
A
L
O
G
I
N
P
U
T
M
O
D
U
L
E
MO
D
E
L
N
O
.
1
7
6
9
-
I
F
4
I
VFD
RJ45
L4
4CB
120P
20A
1CB
GND
PROTECTOR
LINE SURGEL N
120N
24VDC
POWER SUPPLY
8CB
L N
N2
120 VAC 1PH 60HZ
20A
3CB
L3
DOOR SWITCH
LIGHT
L2
12V
BATTERY
24P 24N
L1 N1
L2 N2
2CB
BATTERY
DC OUT
DC IN UPS
24 VDC
BATTERY
DC OUT
DC IN
FIBER SWITCH
PANELVIEW
CB BAT
AC POWER FAIL
N3
N4
PLC
9CB
24P1
24VDC TO 24VDC
POWER SUPPLY
DC OUT
DC IN
DC OUT
DC IN
PANEL RECEPTACLE
L8 N8
10CB
11CB
12CB
DC POWER FAIL
24P3
24P5
15CB
24P4
PLC
DISCRETE
INPUTS
PLC
DISCRETE
OUTPUTS
14CB
PLC ANALOG
INPUTS
16CB
24P7 SPARE
13CB
CB PF
SPARE
7CB
L7 N7
N5L5
5CB
EXTERIOR LIGHT
6CB
L6 N6
DPF
CR
LIFT STATION CONTROL PANEL COMMUNICATIONS LAYOUT
BACKUP FLOAT CIRCUIT
RE
M
O
T
E
I
/
O
P
O
W
E
R
S
U
P
P
L
Y
MO
D
E
L
N
O
.
1
7
6
9
-
P
A
4
10
09
/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
CO
N
F
O
R
M
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
EA
R
KR
S
35
35
04
/
1
5
/
2
0
2
5
CH
A
N
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
N
O
.
3
4
TJ
W
CC
A
Pa
g
e
5
0
o
f
2
7
6
Page 51 of 276
Date:5/19/2025
Project Name:PWRF Phase 2
Contract #
Job #242001
C.O. #CPR 35
Description: PRRC and Lagoon Gate Controls
Hours Rate Hours Rate
Superintendent 5 78.78$ 118.17$ HRS 393.89$
Labor Sub Total 393.89$
Labor Overhead & Profit 15%59.08$
Sick Leave 0%-$
Labor Total 452.97$
Equipment #Equipment Description Units Rate Unit Total
5040187 Crew Truck 5 47.37$ HRS 236.85$
Equipment Sub Total 236.85$
Equipment Overhead & Profit 15%35.53$
Equipment Total 272.38$
Unit Rate Quantity Unit Total
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Material Sub Total -$
Material Overhead & Profit 15%-$
Material Total -$
Unit Rate Quantity Unit Total
15,311.19$ 1 LS 15,311.19$
-$
-$
-$
Sub Contractors Sub Total 15,311.19$
Subcontractor Overhead & Profit 15%2,296.68$
Subcontractor Total 17,607.87$
Unit Rate Quantity Unit Total
1,000.00$ 1 LS 1,000.00$
-$
-$
-$
Other Sub Total 1,000.00$
Other Overhead & Profit 15%150.00$
Stipulations Other Total 1,150.00$
Sub Total 19,483.22$
Accepted by:General Liability Insurance 0.0000%
Bond 0.0%
Date:Total Amount 19,483.22$
This Change increases the time to complete the project by: Day(s)
Force Account/ Change Order Worksheet
Description
See the attached CPR.
This proposal is not protected from tariff price increases.
Material Description
LABOR
EQUIPMENT
MATERIAL
OTHER
Straight Time
Core Drilling
This proposal is based on the usual cost elements such as labor, material, and normal markups and does not include all costs for additional changes in the sequence
of work, delays, disruptions, rescheduling, extended overhead, overtime (unless specified), acceleration, and/or impact costs; and the right is expressly reserved to
make claim for any and all (if any) of these related items prior to final completion of this contract. Please consider this language official "notice" as defined in
subcontract and/or main contract.
Overtime
Class Name/Description Unit Total
SUBCONTRACTORS
Subcontractor Description
Silverline
Corporate Office
PO Box 1900
Battle Ground, WA 98604
360.687.1148
Page 52 of 276
ESTIMATE
39891714
ESTIMATE DATE
May 07, 2025
J O B A D D R E S S
PWRF - Process Water Reuse Facility
957 East Foster Wells Road
Pasco, WA 99301 USA
Job:
E S T I M A T E D E T A I L S
CPR 35: -Added (2) additional 15 Amp breakers to switchboard. Power will be provided to the PRRC 30" and Lagoon 48"
Gates.
-Added power and communication from inside the IPS building to each gate. Conduit should be routed on the IPS building
where it does not block the stairs or become a
hazard.
-Added communication to the PRRC 30” and Lagoon 48” Gates.
SUB-TOTAL $15,311.19
1100 - FRANKLIN COUNTY 8.1%$0.00
TOTAL $15,311.19
EST. FINANCING $164.44
Thank you for choosing Silverline Electric!
CUSTOMER AUTHORIZATION
I have the authority to order the above work and do so order as outlined above. It is agreed that the seller will retain title to
any equipment or material furnished until final and complete payment is made, and if settlement is not made as agreed, the
seller shall have the right to remove same and the seller will be held harmless for any damages resulting from the removal
thereof. In the event of non-payment of any amounts due, the undersigned agrees to pay reasonable interest on all
delinquent monies owed and in the event of collection agrees to pay all costs of collection including attorney fees. The
Service Provider is not responsible for any cosmetic, equipment or structural damage resulting from the repair or diagnosis
of the problem.
Silverline Electric LLC
4121 W Clearwater Ave
Kennewick, WA 99336
BILL TO
Tapani Inc.
1904 Southeast 6th Place # PO Box 1900
Battle Ground, WA 98604 USA
Sign here Date
Estimate #39891714 Page 1 of 1
* The 15 amp breakers and mounting
hardware needed to install them has a
10-12 week lead time.
Page 53 of 276
SILVERLINE
BILLING FORM
Customer Name:Date:7-May
Billing Address:
Job Description:
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
140 $2.57 $359.80
6 $8.69 $52.14
2 $151.00 $302.00
1500 $0.23 $345.00
16 $2.31 $36.96
4 $3.57 $14.28
10 $3.11 $31.10
40 $3.21 $128.40
12 $1.30 $15.60
140 $4.08 $571.20
6 $13.58 $81.48
1000 $0.12 $120.00
16 $3.52 $56.32
4 $5.50 $22.00
10 $4.62 $46.20
12 $1.80 $21.60
1 $6,350.00 $6,350.00
$8,554.08
$9,837.19
40 $5,474.00
SUBTOTAL $15,311.19
TAX
TOTAL
ft of deep slotted strut
3/4 straps w/ clasp back (cast Iron 1 hole)
ft of 1" rigid
1" rigid 90's
PERMIT FEE
TOTAL HRS
MATERIAL TOTAL W/ MARK UP
CPR35
Tapani Inc
MATERIALS USED
3/4" rigid
3/4 rigid 90's
6x6x4 NVENT/HOFFMAN BOX
#12 thhn
feet of 3/4 LFMC
3/4 LFMC straight connectors
3/4 rigid couplings
1" rigid couplings
1" rigid straps with clasp back (cast Iron 1 hole)
Platt quote for 2 Eaton 15 amp 3 pole 480V breakers with mounting hardware
ft of cat5 600v rated
ft of 1" LFMC
1" LFMC straight connectors
MATERIAL SUBTOTAL
Page 54 of 276
Description:
Irrigation Pump Station II
Quote #2559638
Updated On: 05/07/2025
Company Name:
Silverline Electric LLC
Billing Address:
Silverline Electric LLC (146616)
4121 W Clearwater Ave
Kennewick, WA 99336-2629
Created Date:
5/7/25
Shipping Address:
4121 W Clearwater Ave
Kennewick, WA 99336-2629 USA
Shipping Method:
Direct
FOB:
Factory
Sales Person:
Rob Roberts III
rob.roberts@platt.com
Branch:
Kennewick #6
5097837451
PRODUCTS QTY UNT PR / UOM TOTALS
Entire Quote:
Sub Total:$6,350.00
S/H:Not Included
Other Charges:$0.00
Tax:$0.00
Total:$6,350.00
Prices are subject to change at any time prior to shipment unless agreed to otherwise in writing signed by an authorized Seller
representative. Orders related to this quotation must be received, accepted and released by Seller within 48 hours of issuance of the
quotation and are subject to availability. Seller reserves the right to pass through any changes in delivery date, price, scope and
quantity of supply arising from actions of Seller's manufacturing partners or vendors and/or resulting from any Force Majeure event
including any imposition of new or additional tariffs that occurs after the issuance of the quotation. Delivery dates are estimated only.
Seller shall not be liable for failure to meet such dates resulting from product shortages or manufacturing delays. Be advised that
Seller considers any changes imposed by its manufacturing partners and other vendors or government agencies outside of Seller's
reasonable control and therefore subject to Force Majeure provisions or similar common law doctrines such as "frustration" or
"impossibility".
1. PRL4 Retrofit Kit
1 $6,350.00 EA $6,350.00
Products Type Mfr Qty
Per below BOM
(1) PRL4 Retrofit Kit Number: KPRL4FDC3015TXX Circuit breaker, FDC, 15A/15A X Space Required: 3 PRL4 Retrofit Kit
- Existing Panel width is 36(in)
(1) F Frame 3 Pole Connector Kit
(2) 15A 3P FDC Breakers
(1) 6X Blank Filler Cover ( 36-44IN Wide Box )
*** allow 8-10 weeks to ship ***
FOB Factory
000
Page 55 of 276
TJ
W
CC
A
Ap
r
2
2
,
2
0
2
5
Ap
r
2
2
,
2
0
2
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
21
-
0
2
3
6
PW
R
F
2
-
D
-
E
0
2
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
E04 134 170
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
O
N
E
-
L
I
N
E
S
O
U
T
H
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
PW
R
F
P
H
A
S
E
2
:
W
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
6.25A X 1.25 = 7.81 AMPS
3.00A X 1.00 = 3.00 AMPS
3.00A X 1.00 = 3.00 AMPS
6.25A X 1.00 = 6.25 AMPS
2.00A X 1.00 = 2.00 AMPS
6.00A X 1.00 = 6.00 AMPS
IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL TRANSFORMER (3kVA)
IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL GATE MOTOR 1
IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL GATE MOTOR 2
123 MG DRAIN CONTROL TRANSFORMER (3kVA)
PRRC 30" GATE
LAGOON 48" GATE
LOAD CALCULATIONS
TOTAL 28.06 AMPS
123 MG DRAIN CONTROL PANEL, 480V, 3Ø, 4W
20/3
TM
480/277 - VOLT
EXISTING TRANSFORMER
M
EXISTING IRRIGATION PUMP STATION BUILDING, 480V, 3Ø, 4W
20/3
TM
20/3
TM
IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL, 480V, 3Ø, 4W20/3
TM
15/3
TM
1.5 HP
20/2
TM
480V
3KVA,
1Ø, 3W
240/120V
GATE MOTOR 1
GND BUS
NEUTRAL
20/2
TM
480V
3KVA,
1Ø, 3W
240/120V
ONE-LINE DIAGRAM
1. CONTRACTOR TO MODIFY EXISTING EATON PLR-C SWITCHBOARD FOR
ADDITION OF (4) PROPOSED CIRCUIT BREAKERS. EXISTING
SWITCHBOARD IS G.O. NO SKW1072479.
2. SEE DWG NO. E15 FOR CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE.
3. SEE DWG NO. E15 FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.
ELECTRICAL NOTES
20/1
TM
LI
G
H
T
PL
C
20/1
TM
20/1
TM
LI
G
H
T
RE
M
O
T
E
I
/
O
20/1
TM
EXISTING UTILITY METER
15/3
TM
1.5 HP
GATE MOTOR 2
SL
I
P
M
E
T
E
R
20/1
TM
1
1
1
10
09
/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
CO
N
F
O
R
M
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
EA
R
KR
S
15/3
TM 1
0.5 HP
PRRC 30"
3.2 HP
LAGOON 48"
36
36
36
15/3
TM 1
36
36
04
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
5
CH
A
N
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
N
O
.
3
5
TJ
W
CC
A
36
36 36
Pa
g
e
5
6
o
f
2
7
6
J
A1
A1
P
F
F
P
TJ
W
CC
A
Ap
r
2
2
,
2
0
2
5
Ap
r
2
2
,
2
0
2
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
21
-
0
2
3
6
PW
R
F
2
-
D
-
E
1
6
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
E06 136 170
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
S
I
T
E
S
O
U
T
H
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
PW
R
F
P
H
A
S
E
2
:
W
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
IRRIGATION PUMP STATION
IPS SPLITTER BOX PANEL PLAN
1. SEE DWG NO. E05 FOR HANDHOLE SCHEDULE
2. CONTRACTOR TO TERMINATE TO EXISTING FIBER ENCLOSURE IN
BUILDING. SEE COMMUNICATION OVERVIEW FOR DETAILS.
3. CONTRACTOR TO TERMINATE TO EXISTING SWITCHBOARD. SEE
ONE-LINE FOR DETAILS.
4. TERMINATE AUTOMATED GATE CIRCUIT TO EXISTING LIGHTING PANEL
IN EXISTING MOTOR CONTROL CENTER 'MCC' UTILIZING EXISTING SPARE
30/2 CIRCUIT BREAKER. IF GATE REQUIRES CIRCUIT OF LESS AMPERAGE,
CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST CONDUCTORS AND REPLACE CIRCUIT
BREAKER.
5. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH FRANKLIN COUNTY PUD FOR
UTILITY CONNECTION TO EXISTING POWER POLE.
6. CONTRACTOR TO TERMINATE TO EXISTING IPS CONTROL PANEL
ETHERNET SWITCH.
7. THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND INTENDED TO SHOW APPROXIMATE
LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL ITEMS. NOT ALL ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL,
STRUCTURAL OR OTHER ELEMENTS SHOWN.
8. SEE DWG NO. E12 FOR LIGHTING SCHEDULE.
9. SEE DWG NO. E15 FOR CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE.
10. SEE DWG NO. E15 FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.
ELECTRICAL NOTES
A#
1
HH-V6POWER
IPS SPLITTER BOX
CONTROL PANEL
CONTINUES TO EFFLUENT SPLITTER
BOX PANEL PLAN, DWG NO. E07
123 MG DRAIN
CONTROL PANEL10021002
1 HH-POWER
MASTER
KEYPAD
LOCATION
218
AUTOMATIC GATE OPERATOR,
INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER
INSTRUCTIONS
CONDUIT AND CONDUCTORS PER
MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS FOR KEYPAD,
MINIMUM 3/4" WITH (6) - #22 CONDUCTORS.
AUTOMATIC GATE WIRING SCHEMATIC ELECTRICAL VAULT CONNECTION PLAN
1
EXISTING ELECTRICAL VAULT
2
4
3
2
3
4
AUTOMATIC SLIDING
GATE OPERATOR
MASTER ACCESS
KEYPAD PANEL
WSDOT TYPE 1
JUNCTION BOX
PHOTO EYE
SENSOR MOUNTED
ON GATE POST
SLAVE ACCESS
KEYPAD PANEL
NOTE: PROVIDE GROUNDING CONNECTIONS,
CONDUITS, AND CONDUCTORS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
SLAVE KEYPAD
LOCATION
HH-FIBER1
HH-FIBER 1
CONTINUES TO HAND HOLE AT
PRRC SITE, SEE DWG NO. E05
EXISTING FIBER HAND HOLE
5
5
SLIPMETER CONTROL
PANEL MOUNTED ON
BRACKET
10
09
/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
CO
N
F
O
R
M
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
EA
R
KR
S
36
04
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
5
CH
A
N
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
N
O
.
3
5
TJ
W
CC
A
18
03
/
2
0
/
2
0
2
4
CH
A
N
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
N
O
.
1
2
TJ
W
CC
A
36 36 36
636
Pa
g
e
5
7
o
f
2
7
6
TJ
W
CC
A
Ap
r
2
2
,
2
0
2
5
Ap
r
2
2
,
2
0
2
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
21
-
0
2
3
6
PW
R
F
2
-
D
-
E
0
7
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
E15 145 170
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
S
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
PW
R
F
P
H
A
S
E
2
:
W
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
POWER CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE INSTRUMENTATION CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE
CIRCUIT SOURCE DESTINATION TRADE SIZE (QUANTITY) CONDUCTORS NOTES
C001 EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX PANEL EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX HIGH FLOAT SWITCH 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
C002 LAGOON CONTROL PANEL LAGOON CONTROL HIGH FLOAT SWITCH 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
C003 LAGOON CONTROL PANEL DRY WELL FLOOD SWITCH 3/4"(2) - #14, (1) #14 GND
C004 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL DRY WELL FLOOD SWITCH 3/4"(2) - #14, (1) #14 GND
C005 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL HIGH FLOAT SWITCH 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
C006 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL STRUCTURE HIGH FLOAT SWITCH 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
C007 IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL HIGH FLOAT SWITCH 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
C008 LIFT STATION PUMP CONTROL PANEL DRY WELL FLOOD SWITCH 3/4"(2) - #14, (1) #14 GND
C009 LIFT STATION PUMP CONTROL PANEL LIFT STATION LOW FLOAT SWITCH 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
C010 LIFT STATION PUMP CONTROL PANEL LIFT STATION HIGH FLOAT SWITCH 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
C011 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL HIGH FLOAT SWITCH 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
C012 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL STRUCTURE HIGH FLOAT SWITCH 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
C013 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL HIGH FLOAT SWITCH 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
C014 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL STRUCTURE HIGH FLOAT SWITCH 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
C015 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL STRUCTURE HIGH FLOAT SWITCH 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
C016 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL DRY WELL FLOOD SWITCH 3/4"(2) - #14, (1) #14 GND
C017 IPS BUILDING MAIN CONTROL PANEL PH METER CONTROLLER N/A (2) - #12, (1) #12 GND, (1) - 2-CONDUCTOR SHIELDED CABLE USE 1" EXISTING CONDUIT
CONTROL CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE
CIRCUIT SOURCE DESTINATION TRADE SIZE (QUANTITY) CONDUCTORS NOTES
J001 IRRIGATION PUMP STATION IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL 2"FIBER
J002 IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 2"FIBER
J003 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL 2"FIBER
J004 EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL FIBER HAND HOLE 2"FIBER
J005 FIBER HAND HOLE LAGOON CONTROL PANEL 2"FIBER
J006 FIBER HAND HOLE 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 2"FIBER
J007 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL VALVE VAULT CONTROL PANEL 2"FIBER
J008 VALVE VAULT CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 2"FIBER
J009 103 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL LIFT STATION CONTROL PANEL 2"FIBER
J010 LIFT STATION CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 2"FIBER
J011 LIFT STATION CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 2"FIBER
J012 106 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 2"FIBER
J013 IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL LEVEL TRANSDUCER 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
J014 IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL JUNCTION BOX 1"(2) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLES
J015 IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL JUNCTION BOX IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL GATE 1 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J016 IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL JUNCTION BOX IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL GATE 2 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J017 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL STRUCTURE LEVEL TRANSDUCER 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
J018 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER CONTROL 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J019 EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX CONTROL LEVEL TRANSDUCER 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
J020 EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX CONTROL JUNCTION BOX 1"(3) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLES
J021 EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX CONTROL JUNCTION BOX EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX CONTROL GATE 1 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J022 EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX CONTROL JUNCTION BOX EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX SLIPMETER PEDESTAL 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J023 LAGOON CONTROL PANEL LAGOON CONTROL LEVEL TRANSDUCER 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
J024 LAGOON CONTROL PANEL LAGOON CONTROL JUNCTION BOX 1"(5) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLES
J025 LAGOON CONTROL JUNCTION BOX LAGOON CONTROL GATE 1 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J026 LAGOON CONTROL JUNCTION BOX LAGOON CONTROL GATE 2 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J027 LAGOON CONTROL JUNCTION BOX LAGOON CONTROL GATE 3 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J028 LAGOON CONTROL JUNCTION BOX LAGOON CONTROL GATE 4 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J029 LAGOON CONTROL JUNCTION BOX LAGOON CONTROL GATE 5 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J030 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL LEVEL TRANSDUCER 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
J031 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL STRUCTURE LEVEL TRANSDUCER 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
J032 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER PEDESTAL 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J033 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL GATE 1 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J034 LIFT STATION PUMP CONTROL PANEL LIFT STATION RADAR LEVEL TRANSDUCER 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
J035 LIFT STATION PUMP CONTROL PANEL LIFT STATION PRESSURE TRANSMITTER 1"(1) 2-CONDUCTOR SHIELDED CABLE
J036 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL LEVEL TRANSDUCER 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
J037 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL STRUCTURE LEVEL TRANSDUCER 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
J038 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER PEDESTAL 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J039 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL GATE 1 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J040 106 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL FLOW METER 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE, (2) #12, (1) #12 GND
J041 106 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL VALVE 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J042 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL LEVEL TRANSDUCER 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
J043 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL STRUCTURE LEVEL TRANSDUCER 1"MANUFACTURER CABLE
J044 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER PEDESTAL 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J045 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL GATE 1 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J046 103 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL FLOW METER 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE, (2) #12, (1) #12 GND
J047 103 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL VALVE 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J048 VAULT CONTROL PANEL VAULT FLOW METER 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE, (2) #12, (1) #12 GND
J049 VAULT CONTROL PANEL VAULT VALVE 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J050 EXISTING FIBER HAND HOLE FIBER HANDHOLE 2"FIBER
J051 EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX CONTROL JUNCTION BOX EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX CONTROL GATE 2 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J052 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL DARIGOLD DAR-FIT-01 FLOW METER 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE, (2) #12, (1) #12 GND
J053 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL DARIGOLD DAR-FCV-01 VALVE 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J054 PH METER CONTROLLER EXISTING FLOW METER VAULT JUNCTION BOX 3/4"(1) - 2-CONDUCTOR SHIELDED CABLE
J055 EXISTING FLOW METER VAULT JUNCTION BOX PH METER 3/4"(1) - MANUFACTURER'S CABLE
J056 IRRIGATION PUMP STATION CONTROL PANEL PRRC 30" GATE 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
J057 IRRIGATION PUMP STATION CONTROL PANEL LAGOON 48" GATE 1"(1) CAT 5E ETHERNET CABLE
CIRCUIT SOURCE DESTINATION TRADE SIZE (QUANTITY) CONDUCTORS NOTES
P101 ELECTRICAL VAULT PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER 4"PULL CORD
P102 PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER UTILITY METER 3"(3) - #3/0, (1) - #3/0 N
P103 UTILITY METER DISTRIBUTION PANEL 3"(3) - #3/0, (1) - #3/0 N
P104 DISTRIBUTION PANEL EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX PANEL 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) - #12 N, (1) #12 GND
P105 EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX PANEL EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX GATE 1 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P106 EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX PANEL EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX LIGHT 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P107 EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX PANEL EFFLUENT SPLITTER SLIPMETER PEDESTAL 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P108 DISTRIBUTION PANEL POWER HAND HOLE 2"(3) - #8, (1) - #8 N, (1) #10 GND, (3) - #8, (1) - #8 N, (1) #8 GND CONTAINS CIRCUITS P109 AND P116
P109 POWER HAND HOLE LAGOON CONTROL PANEL 3/4"(3) - #8, (1) - #8 N, (1) #10 GND
P110 LAGOON CONTROL PANEL LAGOON GATE 1 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P111 LAGOON CONTROL PANEL LAGOON GATE 2 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P112 LAGOON CONTROL PANEL LAGOON GATE 3 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P113 LAGOON CONTROL PANEL LAGOON GATE 4 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P114 LAGOON CONTROL PANEL LAGOON GATE 5 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P115 LAGOON CONTROL PANEL LAGOON CONTROL LIGHT 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P116 POWER HAND HOLE 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 2"(3) - #8, (1) - #8 N, (1) #8 GND
P117 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL GATE 1 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P118 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL LIGHT 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P119 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER PEDESTAL 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P120 IRRIGATION PUMP STATION POWER HAND HOLE 3/4"(6) - #12, (2) - #12 N, (2) #12 GND
P121 POWER HAND HOLE IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 N, (1) #12 GND
P122 IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL GATE 1 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P123 IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL GATE 2 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P124 IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL PANEL IPS SPLITTER BOX CONTROL LIGHT 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P125 POWER HAND HOLE 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 N, (1) #12 GND
P126 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL LIGHT 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P127 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER CONTROL 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P128 EXISTING IPS LIGHTING PANEL AUTOMATED GATE OPERATOR 1"(2) - #10, (1) #10 GND
P129 EFFLUENT SPLITTER SLIPMETER PEDESTAL EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX SLIPMETER 2"MANUFACTURER'S CABLES
P130 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER PEDESTAL 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER 2"MANUFACTURER'S CABLES
P131 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER CONTROL 123 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER 2"MANUFACTURER'S CABLES
P132 EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX PANEL EFFLUENT SPLITTER BOX GATE 2 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P133 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL DARIGOLD DAR-FCV-01 VALVE 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P134 IRRIGATION PUMP STATION PRRC 30" GATE 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P135 IRRIGATION PUMP STATION LAGOON 48" GATE 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P001 EXISTING ELECTRICAL VAULT V-8.2 ELECTRICAL VAULT 6"PULL CORD
P002 PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER UTILITY METER 3"(3) - #3/0, (1) - #3/0 N
P003 UTILITY METER DISTRIBUTION PANEL 3"(3) - #3/0, (1) - #3/0 N
P004 DISTRIBUTION PANEL 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) - #12 N, (1) #12 GND
P005 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL GATE 1 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P006 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL LIGHT 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P007 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER PEDESTAL 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P008 DISTRIBUTION PANEL LIFT STATION PUMP CONTROL PANEL 2"(3) - #1/0, (1) - #1/0 N, (1) #6 GND
P009 LIFT STATION PUMP CONTROL PANEL LIFT STATION PUMP 1 1"(3) - #6, (1) #8 GND
P010 LIFT STATION PUMP CONTROL PANEL LIFT STATION PUMP 2 1"(3) - #6, (1) #8 GND
P011 LIFT STATION PUMP CONTROL PANEL LIFT STATION PUMP CONTROL LIGHT 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P012 DISTRIBUTION PANEL POWER HAND HOLE 3/4"(6) - #12, (2) - #12 N, (2) #12 GND
P013 POWER HAND HOLE 106 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) - #12 N, (1) #12 GND
P014 106 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL LIGHT 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P015 POWER HAND HOLE 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 2"(3) - #6, (1) - #6 N, (1) #6 GND
P016 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL GATE 1 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P017 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL LIGHT 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P018 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER PEDESTAL 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P019 DISTRIBUTION PANEL POWER HAND HOLE 1 1/4"(6) - #12, (2) - #12 N, (2) #12 GND
P020 POWER HAND HOLE 103 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) - #12 N, (1) #12 GND
P021 103 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL LIGHT 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P022 POWER HAND HOLE VALVE VAULT PANEL 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) - #12 N, (1) #12 GND
P023 VALVE VAULT PANEL VALVE VAULT LIGHT 3/4"(2) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P024 LAGOON CONTROL PANEL DRY WELL FUTURE PUMP 2"PULL CORD CAP CONDUIT INSIDE DRY WELL
P025 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL DRY WELL FUTURE PUMP 2"PULL CORD CAP CONDUIT INSIDE DRY WELL
P026 LIFT STATION PUMP CONTROL PANEL DRY WELL FUTURE PUMP 2"PULL CORD CAP CONDUIT INSIDE DRY WELL
P027 103 MG LAGOON DRAIN CONTROL PANEL DRY WELL FUTURE PUMP 2"PULL CORD CAP CONDUIT INSIDE DRY WELL
P028 ELECTRICAL VAULT PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER 4"PULL CORD
P029 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER PEDESTAL 106 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER 2"MANUFACTURER'S CABLES
P030 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER PEDESTAL 120 MG LAGOON DRAIN SLIPMETER 2"MANUFACTURER'S CABLES
P031 106 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 106 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL VALVE 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P032 103 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL PANEL 103 MG LAGOON FILL CONTROL VALVE 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P033 VALVE VAULT PANEL VALVE VAULT CONTROL VALVE 3/4"(3) - #12, (1) #12 GND
P034 V-8.2 ELECTRICAL VAULT ELECTRICAL VAULT 4"PULL CORD
3
06
/
2
9
/
2
0
2
3
AD
D
E
N
D
U
M
N
O
.
3
TJ
W
CC
A
10
09
/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
CO
N
F
O
R
M
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
EA
R
KR
S
ITEM DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODEL NO.
A DISTRIBUTION PANEL 480Y/277V VAC 3ɸ, NEMA 3R, SEE ONE LINE FOR REQUIRED CURRENT RATINGS EATON PRL4B OR EQUAL
B RADAR LEVEL TRANSDUCER SEE SPECS SEE SPECS
C LIQUID LEVEL TRANSDUCER SEE SPECS SEE SPECS
D FLOAT SWITCH SEE SPECS SEE SPECS
E PRESSURE TRANSDUCER SEE SPECS SEE SPECS
F TEMPERATURE TRANSMITTER SEE SPECS SEE SPECS
G PH SENSOR CONTROLLER, 24V DC POWER, MULTI-PARAMETER PROMINENT DULCOMETER DACB
H PH SENSOR, 5 METER CABLE PROMINENT REV M2 INDUSTRIAL CPVC BODY PH SENSOR, MODEL 7760769
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION SCHEDULE
14
01
/
0
8
/
2
0
2
4
CH
A
N
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
N
O
.
6
TJ
W
CC
A
18
03
/
2
0
/
2
0
2
4
CH
A
N
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
N
O
.
1
2
TJ
W
CC
A
25 08/07/2024 CHANGE PROPOSAL REQUEST NO. 20 TJW CCA
26 10/17/2024 CHANGE PROPOSAL REQUEST NO. 21.1 TJW CCA
30 02/06/2025 CHANGE PROPOSAL REQUEST NO. 28 TJW CCA
36
36
36
36
36 04/23/2025 CHANGE PROPOSAL REQUEST NO. 35 TJW CCA
Pa
g
e
5
8
o
f
2
7
6
TJ
W
CC
A
Ap
r
2
2
,
2
0
2
5
Ap
r
2
2
,
2
0
2
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
21
-
0
2
3
6
PW
R
F
2
-
D
-
E
0
9
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
E17 147 170
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
CO
M
M
U
N
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
PW
R
F
P
H
A
S
E
2
:
W
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
COMMUNICATION OVERVIEW
1. PROVIDE SFP MODULE FOR INSTALLATION INTO EXISTING CISCO SWITCH.
2. PROVIDE 100' PATCH CABLE FOR INSTALLATION BETWEEN TERMINATION LOCATION AND EXISTING
SWITCH.
3. CONTRACTOR TO TERMINATE TO EXISTING FIBER COMMUNICATION PANEL.
4. FIBER TERMINATION, TYP. PROVIDE MINIMUM TERMINATION SHOWN PLUS 2 SPARE PER LOCATION.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MATERIALS FOR A COMPLETE SYSTEM. ALL FIBER, SWITCHES, SFP
MODULES, TERMINATION PANELS, CONNECTORS, AND PATCH CABLES SHALL MATCH IN TYPE AND STYLE.
6. NOT ALL CONNECTIONS AND DETAILS SHOWN. SEE CONTROL PANEL DRAWINGS FOR COMPLETE PANEL,
COMMUNICATION, POWER, AND I/O DETAILS.
ELECTRICAL NOTES
1
2
3
4
IRRIGATION PUMP
STATION BUILDING
IPS SPLITTER BOX
CONTROL PANEL
GATE 1
GATE 2
PANELVIEW
PLC
EFFLUENT SPLITTER
BOX CONTROL PANEL
GATE 1
GATE 2
SLIPMETER
PANELVIEW
LAGOON CONTROL
PANEL
PANELVIEW
PLC
GATE 1
GATE 2
GATE 3
GATE 4
GATE 5
LIFT STATION
CONTROL PANEL
PANELVIEW
PLC
GATE 1
103 MG LAGOON DRAIN
CONTROL PANEL
SLIPMETER
GATE
PLC
106 MG LAGOON DRAIN
CONTROL PANEL
SLIPMETER
GATE
PLC
103 MG LAGOON FILL
CONTROL PANEL
FLOW METER
PLC
120 MG LAGOON DRAIN
CONTROL PANEL
SLIPMETER
GATE
PLC
VALVE VAULT
CONTROL PANEL
FLOW METER
PLC
123 MG LAGOON DRAIN
CONTROL PANEL
SLIPMETER
PLC
4
106 MG LAGOON FILL
CONTROL PANEL
FLOW METER
PLC
10
09
/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
CO
N
F
O
R
M
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
EA
R
KR
S
VALVE
VALVEVALVE
14
01
/
0
8
/
2
0
2
4
CH
A
N
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
N
O
.
6
TJ
W
CC
A
1
2
3
PLC
25
08
/
0
7
/
2
0
2
4
CH
A
N
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
N
O
.
2
0
TJ
W
CC
A
DARIGOLD
DAR-FIT-01
FLOW METER
26
10
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
4
CH
A
N
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
N
O
.
2
1
.
1
TJ
W
CC
A
DARIGOLD
DAR-FCV-01
VALVE
PRRC 30" GATE
LAGOON 48" GATE
36
36 04/23/2025 CHANGE PROPOSAL REQUEST NO. 35 TJW CCA
Pa
g
e
5
9
o
f
2
7
6
Resolution – PWRF PH 2 Project PSA Amend 7 - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON.
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 7
FOR THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RH2
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE PROCESS WATER REUSE FACILITY
(PWRF) PRETREATMENT IMPROVEMENT PHASE 2: WINTER STORAGE.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) and RH2 Engineering, Inc., entered into a
Professional Service Agreement on August 10, 2021, to provide Engineering services with respect
to the PWRF Improvements project; and
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc., entered into Amendment No. 1 on May
9, 2022, to add additional professional engineering (design) services for additional winter storage;
and
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc., entered into Amendment No. 2 on July
12, 2022, to add additional professional engineering services for the acquisition of additional land
from the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR); and
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc., entered into Amendment No. 3 on
August 26, 2022, to add additional services for cultural and environmental field work and
associated reporting for an additional 160-acre parcel owned by the USBR, and additional
permitting support to facilitate the acquisition process being administered by the USBR to meet
funding requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc., entered into Amendment No. 4 on
January 6, 2023, to add additional professional engineering services for supporting the future
operations of the facility by interconnecting ponds, coordinating work between the m ultiple
ongoing phases of the project at the PWRF site; and
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc., entered into Amendment No. 5 on
January 18, 2024, to allow RH2 Engineering, Inc., to provide additional professional engineering
services during construction including construction contract administration, project management
duties in compliance with Federal regulations of the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF)
loan; and
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc., entered into Amendment No. 6 on
December 16, 2024, to extend the PSA contract with RH2 Engineering, Inc., to December 31,
2025, with no change in Scope and Fee; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into Amendment No. 7
with RH2 Engineering, Inc.
Page 60 of 276
Resolution – PWRF PH 2 Project PSA Amend 7 - 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of
Amendment No. 7 between the City of Pasco and RH2 Engineering as attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Amendment No. 7 on behalf of the City of
Pasco; and to make minor substantive changes as necessary to execute this Amendment.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
David Milne
Interim Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 61 of 276
RH2 Engineering – Amendment No. 21039-7 to PSA
Process Water Reuse Facility Pretreatment Improvements – Phase 2: Winter Storage
Project N0. 21298 Page 1
AMENDMENT NUMBER 7 to
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Process Water Reuse Facility Pretreatment Improvements – Phase 2: Winter Storage
PROJECT: 21298
AGREEMENT NO. 21-039
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc. entered into a Professional Services
Agreement on 8/10/2021 to provide engineering services with respect to the Process Water
Reuse Facility (PWRF) Pretreatment Improvements – Phase 2: Winter Storage project.
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc. entered into Amendment No. 1 to
provide additional engineering services on 5/19/2022.
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc. entered into Amendment No. 2 to
provide additional engineering services and add permitting services on 7/12/2022.
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc. entered into Amendment No. 3 to
provide additional engineering services on 8/26/2022.
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc. entered into Amendment No. 4 to
provide additional engineering services on 1/6/2023.
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc. entered into Amendment No. 5 to
provide additional engineering services and add construction related services on 1/18/2024.
WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc. entered into Amendment No. 6 to
allow for additional time of performance services on 12/16/2024.
NOW, THEREFORE, this agreement is amended to allow RH2 Engineering, Inc. to
provide additional engineering services, additional construction related services.
1. Scope of Work:
See Exhibit A.
2. Fee:
The compensation for the additional work is based on a Time & Materials Basis of
$237,854.00, increasing the overall total authorization amount to $3,770,455.00. For
further detail please see Exhibit B.
3. Time of performance:
The services shall be complete for the project on or before 12/31/2025.
DATED THIS DAY______________________________.
[date of execution]
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON RH2 ENGINEERING, INC.
Dave Zabell Dan Mahlum, PE
Interim City Manager Principal
Page 62 of 276
1
7/11/2025 9:47:45 AM J:\Data\PSC\21-0236\00 Contract\A-7\Amend No. 7_SOW_PWRF PH 2 SDC.docx
Scope of Work
Amendment No. 7
City of Pasco
Process Water Reuse Facility Improvements
Winter Storage
July 2025
Background
The City of Pasco (City) has requested that RH2 Engineering, Inc., (RH2) perform additional tasks
beyond the original scope of work for services during construction (SDC). The tasks include
coordinating with the City and contractor for the installation of monitoring wells, coordinating with
the City and Cascade Natural Gas Corporation (CNGC) on the installation of a gas line to the Pasco
Resource Recovery Center (PRRC), designing power to automated slide gates on the Irrigation Pump
Station (IPS), and preparing easement documents for the Process Water Reuse Facility (PWRF) and
PRRC. This Scope of Work also includes additional effort to coordinate with Burnham RNG, LLC,
(Burnham) for the PWRF and PRRC.
Task 8 – Services During Construction (Regular)
Objective: Provide additional coordination as requested by the City during SDC. These subtasks are
additive to Contract Amendment No. 5, Task 8.
Approach:
Review and comment on proposals from Valley Science and Engineering, Inc., for the drilling
of the groundwater monitoring wells. Coordinate with the City and the Washington State
Department of Ecology (Ecology) to identify ways to implement the monitoring well drilling
task with available funding.
Coordinate utility installation with purveyors, including CNGC, during construction.
Provide the design for extending power from the IPS electrical room to the automated slide
gates on the wet well.
Provide AutoCAD drawings to MGS Pasco, Inc., (MGS) for the creation of recordable
PWRF/PRRC easement drawings related to the CNGC pipeline and Franklin Public Utility
District (FPUD) power easements.
Provide programming and integration services for the controls installed during construction.
Programming will include programmable logic controllers (PLCs), operator interface screens
(OIS), and the computer-based supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. It is
assumed the programming will be based on standard programming developed for the City by
RH2’s subsidiary, Control Systems NW LLC. Integrate the programming of the upgrades with
existing City systems, including connecting the existing Historian system to the SCADA system
EXHIBIT A
Page 63 of 276
City of Pasco Exhibit A – Scope of Work
PWRF Improvements – Winter Storage Amendment No. 7
2
7/11/2025 9:47:45 AM J:\Data\PSC\21-0236\00 Contract\A-7\Amend No. 7_SOW_PWRF PH 2 SDC.docx
programmed as part of this project. It is assumed that the City will purchase all licensing and
hardware needed for the SCADA portion directly from the vendor.
Assumptions:
•All deliverables will be provided in electronic format (PDF).
Provided by the City:
•Legal review and recording of the easement documents prepared by MGS.
•SCADA licensing and hardware.
RH2 Deliverables:
•A change proposal request for extending power to the automated slide gates on the IPS wet
well.
•Linework for easement documents to be prepared by MGS for recording by Franklin County.
•Programmed and integrated PLCs, OIS, and SCADA system.
Task 11 – Additional Burnham Coordination
Objective: Work with the City and Burnham on various issues related to the startup of PRRC. Provide
additional SDC efforts for PWRF Phase 2 related to the delayed startup at PRRC. These subtasks are
additive to Amendment No. 4, Task 11.
Approach:
Provide additional coordination with Burnham and the City during PRRC startup
Provide additional PWRF Phase 2 SDC efforts related to the delayed PRRC startup.
Assumptions:
•
• All deliverables will be provided in electronic format (PDF).
•Construction on the 123 million gallon (MG) outlet structure will begin prior to July 11, 2025.
•Ecology’s Dam Safety Office will not require Shannon & Wilson, Inc. or Hydrogeophysics, Inc.
as subconsultants for construction observation during the 123 MG lagoon embankment
reconstruction.
RH2 Deliverables:
•Attendance at on-site and virtual meetings.
•Additional on-site observation and administrative work (progress meetings, pay requests,
certified payroll processing, Ecology coordination, etc.) caused by the delayed PRRC startup.
Schedule
•RH2 is prepared to begin the project immediately after authorization from the City.
Page 64 of 276
EXHIBIT B
Fee Estimate
Amendment No. 7
City of Pasco
Process Water Reuse Facility Improvements
Winter Storage
Jul-25
Description
Total
Hours
Total RH2
Labor
Total
Hours
Total CSNW
Labor
Total ALL
Labor
Total
Subconsultant
Total Expense Total Cost
Task 8 Services During Construction (Regular)102 27,210$ 352 73,342$ 100,552$ 3,220$ 3,067$ 106,839$
Task 11 Additional Burnham Coordination 530 119,358$ --$ 119,358$ 5,750$ 5,907$ 131,015$
PROJECT TOTAL 632 146,568$ 352 73,342$ 219,910$ 8,970$ 8,974$ 237,854$
J:\Data\PSC\21-0236\00 Contract\A-7\Amend No. 7_FEE_PWRF PH 2 SDC 7/10/2025 11:05 AMPage 65 of 276
RATE LIST RATE UNIT
Professional I $175 $/hr
Professional II $191 $/hr
Professional III $213 $/hr
Professional IV $234 $/hr
Professional V $249 $/hr
Professional VI $269 $/hr
Professional VII $294 $/hr
Professional VIII $317 $/hr
Professional IX $326 $/hr
Technician I $134 $/hr
Technician II $148 $/hr
Technician III $171 $/hr
Technician IV $182 $/hr
Technician V $198 $/hr
Technician VI $217 $/hr
Technician VII $236 $/hr
Technician VIII $247 $/hr
Control Specialist I $175 $/hr
Control Specialist II $191 $/hr
Control Specialist III $213 $/hr
Control Specialist IV $234 $/hr
Control Specialist V $249 $/hr
Control Specialist VI $269 $/hr
Control Specialist VII $294 $/hr
Control Specialist VIII $317 $/hr
Control Specialist IX $326 $/hr
Control Technician I $134 $/hr
Control Technician II $148 $/hr
Control Technician III $171 $/hr
Control Technician IV $182 $/hr
Control Technician V $198 $/hr
Control Technician VI $217 $/hr
Control Technician VII $236 $/hr
Control Technician VIII $247 $/hr
Administrative I $90 $/hr
Administrative II $105 $/hr
Administrative III $124 $/hr
Administrative IV $148 $/hr
Administrative V $173 $/hr
CAD/GIS System $27.50 $/hr
CAD Plots - Half Size $2.50 price per plot
CAD Plots - Full Size $10.00 price per plot
CAD Plots - Large $25.00 price per plot
Copies (bw) 8.5" X 11"$0.09 price per copy
Copies (bw) 8.5" X 14"$0.14 price per copy
Copies (bw) 11" X 17"$0.20 price per copy
Copies (color) 8.5" X 11"$0.90 price per copy
Copies (color) 8.5" X 14"$1.20 price per copy
Copies (color) 11" X 17"$2.00 price per copy
Technology Charge 2.50%% of Direct Labor
Night Work 10.00%% of Direct Labor
Mileage $0.7000
price per mile
(or Current IRS Rate)
Subconsultants 15%Cost +
Outside Services at cost
RH2 ENGINEERING, INC.
2025 SCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES
Rates listed are adjusted annually. Page 66 of 276
Pasco City Council
August 11, 2025
Workshop
Pa
g
e
6
7
o
f
2
7
6
PWRF Improvements Phase 2
CO No. 11 With Tapani, Inc. &
PSA Amendment No. 7 with RH2
August 11, 2025
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
6
8
o
f
2
7
6
PWRF Improvements - Phase 2: Winter Storage
2018 Existing Facility 2025 Expanded Facility
Existing
Irrigation Pump
Station (IPS)
New winter
storage:
330MG
Existing winter
storage: 165MG
Phase 3 Improv
(PRRC)
Pa
g
e
6
9
o
f
2
7
6
PWRF Improvements - Phase 2: Winter Storage
Pa
g
e
7
0
o
f
2
7
6
PWRF Improvements - Phase 2: Winter Storage
Pa
g
e
7
1
o
f
2
7
6
PWRF Improvements - Phase 2: Winter Storage
Pa
g
e
7
2
o
f
2
7
6
PWRF Improvements - Phase 2: Winter Storage
Proposed Change OrderNo.11
for construction contract with Tapani, Inc.
$33,019,585.73Awarded Construction Contract
and previous COs No. 1-10
$85,531.01Proposed Change OrderNo. 11
$33,105,116.74New Contract Amount
Pa
g
e
7
3
o
f
2
7
6
PWRF Improvements - Phase 2: Winter Storage
Proposed Amendment No. 7
for Prof Serv. Agreement with RH2 Engineering
$3,532,601.00Previously approved PSA and
amendments 1-6
$237,854.00Amendment No. 7
$3,770,455.00New PSA Total
Pa
g
e
7
4
o
f
2
7
6
PWRF Improvements - Phase 2: Winter Storage
Summary
Total Fiscal Impact
$85,531.01Proposed Change OrderNo. 11
$237,854.00Amendment No. 7
$323,385.01New PSA Total
Both the proposed amendment and change order can be
accommodated within the existing project budget.
Pa
g
e
7
5
o
f
2
7
6
Questions?
Pa
g
e
7
6
o
f
2
7
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 11, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 8/18/25
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Presentation - Mid-Columbia Library Annexation (10 minute
presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Presentation
Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presentation - Pasco's Mid-Columbia Libraries Annexation from Kyle Cox, Mid-
Columbia Libraries Executive Director
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City of Pasco contracts with Mid-Columbia Libraries (MCL) for library
services under an Interlocal Agreement established in 2010 and amended in
2022. MCL serves more than 260,000 residents across Benton, Franklin, and
parts of Adams Counties through 12 branches, a rural delivery service, and a
digital library. Pasco hosts the largest Spanish-language collection in the MCL
system and accounts for 25% of computer usage, 24% of reference questions.
Pasco residents report a 96% satisfaction rate with MCL services. Funding of
the services provided by MCL through the City’s General Fund, with $2.53
million budgeted in 2025 and $2.78 million in 2026. The ILA contains provisions
allowing for discussion of annexation into the MCL District, which would
change the funding source from the General Fund to a dedicated property tax
levy.
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 77 of 276
At Council's direction, City staff initiated a discussion with MCL regarding the
potential annexation of the City into the library district per the Section XIV of
the inter-local agreement. Kyle Cox, Mid-Columbia Libraries Executive
Director, will be presenting to City Council on the topic of that annexation
process and staff are seeking direction from Council on this matter.
Annexation into the MCL District is an alternative to the current service model
in which funding is provided through a dedicated property tax levy rather than
the City’s General Fund. This option provides a stable and predictable funding
source, grants and District, the Pasco responsibility operational shifts to
governance district’s the structure. representation direct residents within
Annexation would require voter approval, as well as potential negotiations
regarding the the use or transfer of City-owned library facilities should
annexation be approved by the voters.
Page 78 of 276
Pasco City Council Presentation
Kyle Cox
Executive Director & Chief Librarian
Pa
g
e
7
9
o
f
2
7
6
Our Mission
Pa
g
e
8
0
o
f
2
7
6
Pasco & MCL
City of Pasco operates its Carnegie Library1910-1961
Voters approve $350K bond (+67%) to construct new library1960
Pasco Library (Hopkins St) opens to the public1961
Voters approve $1.75 million bond (+72%) to remodel
the Pasco Library & relocate a fire station 1998
Voters create MCL to serve Benton & Franklin Counties 1948
City of Pasco contracts with MCL1973 1973
West Pasco Library opens to the public2013 2013
MLK Community Center Library opens to the public2026 2026
Pa
g
e
8
1
o
f
2
7
6
Your Pasco Libraries
•Largest Spanish collection in our system
•25% of system-wide computer usage
•24% of system-wide reference questions
•18% of system-wide wireless sessions
•Kadlec Community Health Worker
Proudly serving the people
of Pasco since 1973
Pa
g
e
8
2
o
f
2
7
6
•Over 680 monthly drive-through visits
•18% of system-wide collection usage
•20% of system-wide collection holds
•12,000 in-branch program attendees in 2024
•Average storytime attendances is 40 people
Your Pasco Libraries
Proudly serving the people
of Pasco since 2013
Pa
g
e
8
3
o
f
2
7
6
2025 Customer Satisfaction Survey
96% of Pasco respondents reported being very satisfied (79%) or
satisfied (17%) with their overall experience with MCL.
Pa
g
e
8
4
o
f
2
7
6
2025 Customer Satisfaction Survey
LITERACY & LEARNING
MCL plays an important role in:
98% Providing excellent resources for your child and your family
97% Helping your child read more, enjoy learning and be more
confident in their reading
95% Supporting the learning and development of your child
91% Helping your child enter school ready to learn
(Pasco Respondents who strongly agreed/agreed)
Pa
g
e
8
5
o
f
2
7
6
2025 Customer Satisfaction Survey
ENRICHMENT & RECREATION
MCL plays an important role in:
97% Enhancing lifelong reading
95% Enhancing reading, viewing and listening for pleasure
95% Providing books and content you want in an accessibly and
timely manner
(Pasco Respondents who strongly agreed/agreed)
Pa
g
e
8
6
o
f
2
7
6
Savings by Pasco Residents
$10,254,220 in savings in 2024
$6,580,280 Physical Check-outs
$3,673,940 Digital Check-outs
Pa
g
e
8
7
o
f
2
7
6
Revenues of Washington Public Libraries
Type % Local Revenue from
Contracts
Revenue from
Contracting Total Local Revenue Total Local Revenue
Per Capita
King County 0.50%$673,400 $135,402,933 $85.60
Sno-Isle Intercounty 0.01%$4,158 $64,530,664 $80.57
Seattle Municipal 0.00%$ - $83,061,909 $108.55
Pierce County 0.02%$6,906 $41,399,653 $63.20
Timberland Intercounty 0.00%$ - $25,812,553 $47.90
Ft. Vancouver Intercounty 1.01%$287,091 $28,297,120 $52.73
Spokane*County 2.67%$466,092 $17,466,516 $56.91
North Central*Intercounty 2.81%$426,088 $15,163,988 $55.32
Kitsap County 0.21%$35,108 $16,781,586 $59.74
Mid-Columbia Intercounty 38.90%$3,380,902 $8,691,533 $32.60
Yakima*County 0.82%$70,655 $8,624,747 $34.65
Spokane*Municipal 0.00%$ - $12,116,251 $52.47
Tacoma Municipal 0.00%$ - $15,946,646 $72.22
Pa
g
e
8
8
o
f
2
7
6
2025 – Property Tax Levies
$0.25
$0.34
$0.45
$0.28
$0.36
$0.49
$0.27
MCL:
$0.23
Pa
g
e
8
9
o
f
2
7
6
Annexation Process & Timeline
Legal Mechanism - RCW 27.12.360
✓City Council initiates annexation via ordinance
“Stating its intent to join the library district” and “finding that the public
interest will be served thereby.”
•State Librarian is notified of ordinance
✓Library Board passes resolution on annexation
•If Board concurs, sent to County Commissioners
✓County Commissioners pass a resolution calling for annexation
vote for next special election
Pa
g
e
9
0
o
f
2
7
6
Annexation Process & Timeline
Election - RCW 27.12.370
✓Simple majority needed to annex
•Ballot measure reads: “Shall the City of Pasco be annexed to the
Mid-Columbia Library District? Yes …. No …. ”
✓Last annexation vote in WA to fail was in 2004 in King County
✓Eastern Washington, rural communities typically vote “yes” at a
higher rate than urban & Western WA communities
Pa
g
e
9
1
o
f
2
7
6
Your Public Library for 52 Years
Pa
g
e
9
2
o
f
2
7
6
Questions?
Pa
g
e
9
3
o
f
2
7
6
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF PASCO AND
MID-COLUMBIA LIBRARIES
THIS INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT, hereinafter referred to as the
Agreement", for library services is entered into by and between the City of Pasco, Washington,hereinafter referred to as "City", and the Mid-Columbia Libraries, hereinafter referred to asDistrict", on this 3 day of ._4• 2022.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, District and the City are authorized by RCW 39.34.030(1) to enter into this
Agreement for the purpose of providing library services to the citizens of the City of Pasco, and
District is authorized pursuant to RCW 27.12.180 to render library services to the City providingtothecitizensoftheCitythesamelibraryprivilegesasthoseprovidedforresidentsofDistrict'slibrarydistrict; and
WHEREAS, the District and the City have been operating successfully under a Contract
dated June 7,2010, extended by an agreement dated October 20,2020, and subsequently extended
by an agreement dated November 22, 2021, and whereby Resolution No. 4195, extended the ILA
through July 30, 2022, whereby the District has furnished complete library service to the City inreturnforfundsprovidedbytheCity; and
WHEREAS,for the mutual benefit of all,and to give the best library service to the greatest
number of people at the most reasonable cost, and to make it convenient for the City residents to
use library books and other materials by making the most economical use of available funds
through the centralization of supervision and the purchase of supplies, books and other librarymaterialsandequipment; NOW THEREFORE,
IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows:
I.Termination of Prior Contract: The contract dated June 7, 2010, and its
subsequent extensions now in effect between District and the City shall be tertninated as of June
30, 2022, and superseded by this Agreement with an effective date of July l, 2022.
II. General Conditions: The District agrees that it shall make available to the
residents of Pasco the resources and library services generally available throughout the LibraryDistrict, and except as otherwise provided in Section VI herein, to the extent deemed reasonable
and equitable by the District in view of its district-wide service responsibilities.The District further
agrees that the residents of the City are entitled to, and shall receive the same library privileges as
are provided to all residents of the District.
Page 94 of 276
III. Library Materials: In the provision of books and non-print materials by theDistrict, the collection for a community library shall depend on the population served, the shelf
space available,the use made of the materials,and the funds available in the district-wide materialsbudget. The District has the sole responsibility for the selection and maintenance of such materials.In addition, the District shall make all decisions regarding disposition of gifted materials and
equipment.Regulations governing the use of the library and its collection will be set by the District.
IV. Library Staff: The District shall provide competent and qualified staff suitable for
rendering library services to the public and shall have sole responsibility for all personneladministration, including selection, training, discipline and other personnel administrativefunctions.
V. Operated Facilities
A• Pasco Library - Main Branch: District shall have full use of the existinglibraryfacilitylocatedat1320WestHopkins, Pasco, Washington, for the operation of a
public library and for no other purpose, and shall take all reasonable precautions to prevent
damage, injury, or loss by reason of or related to the operation of the library. The District
shall also have use of the furnishings, shelving, and counters, including such replacement
and additional furnishings, equipment and materials purchased by the City.
The facility shall be jointly managed with District having complete authority overthelibraryservicesrendered. The City, at its sole expense, will repair and maintain thefacility, including HVAC, heating, air conditioning, plumbing, water, lights, and
reasonable janitorial service and grounds maintenance. The City will also pay for all utilityservices, including power, water, sewer, and garbage collection, except for cable and
internet. Notwithstanding the forgoing,District shall be liable for damages to the premises
caused intentionally, negligently, or from misuse by District's employees.
District shall not make any alterations, additions, improvements,utility installation
including power panels) to the premises without the prior written consent of the City,which consent will not be unreasonably withheld.
The City may utilize meeting space in the Main Branch, and the City meeting useswillhavepriorityovernon-District users. Scheduling shall be coordinated with the
designated library staff, so as not to interfere with the DistricYs normal operations of thelibrary.
During the term of this Agreement, and any renewal thereof, the Library shall beidentifiedbyexteriorletteringas: "Pasco Library Operated by Mid-Columbia Libraries. "
B• Pasco Library - West Branch: The District agrees to rent, staff and
maintain a West Pasco Branch Library at no direct cost to the City, and on such terms as
Page 95 of 276
are agreeable to the District. The parties understand that this is a temporary measure until
the City is able to provide the District with a substitute facility(hereinafter the "Substitute
West Branch Facility"). The size, location and operating hours of the West Pasco Branch
Library will be determined by the District after consultation with the City. The District
shall have complete authority over the library services rendered at the West Branch.
District and City agree to enter commence a feasibility study and mutual planningforanewWestBranchfacilitywithinone (1) year from the commencement of this
agreement.
During the term of this Agreement, and any renewal thereof, the West Pasco
Library shall be identified by exterior lettering as: "West Pasco Library Operated by Mid-Columbia Libraries," or as mutually agreed upon by the parties.
C. Pasco Library - Martin Luther King Center Branch: The City shall
provide an enclosed, lockable space within the Martin Luther King Center, located at 205
S. Wehe, of suitable size and layout for the operation of a public library. The District shall
have complete authority over the library services rendered at the Martin Luther King Center
Branch,and will staff, stock,and operate the Martin Luther King Center Branch,includingdedicatedpubliccomputers.
The City,at its sole expense,will repair and maintain the facility, including HVAC,
heating, air conditioning, plumbing, water, lights, and reasonable janitorial service and
grounds maintenance. The City will also pay for all utility services,including power,water,
sewer,and garbage collection, except for cable and internet.Notwithstanding the forgoing,
District shall be liable for damages to the premises caused intentionally, negligently, orfrommisusebyDistrict's employees.
District shall not make any alterations, additions, improvements,utility installation
including power panels) to the premises without the prior written consent of the City,
which consent will not be unreasonably withheld.
VI. Hours of Service: Regular hours of service will be determined by the District,
taking into account the population served, the use made of the facilities, and the funds available in
the district-wide staff budget, provided, however, the contract fee specified in Section X shall
entitle the City to a minimum of 100 hours total per week of scheduled service among all branches
combined, however, service to the Main Branch shall be not less than 40 hours per week, and
service at the Martin Luther King Center Branch,when opened, shall be not less than 20 hours per
week. Any reduction in the schedule of service below the foregoing hours shall require written
agreement of the parties.
VII. Fire and All Risk Insurance: The City shall maintain, at its sole expense, fire and
all risk casualty insurance upon the premises of the Main Branch, the Martin Luther King Center
Page 96 of 276
Branch, and the Substitute West Branch Facility as part of its existing blanket insurance policies
for full replacement value, together with all City owned furnishings, equipment, and materials
therein. The District shall procure and,maintain at its expense such insurance as it deems necessaryfarthecoverageofitsmaterials, equipment, and supplies at the Main Branch, West Pasco
Branch/Substitute West Branch Facility, and Martin Luther King Center Branch, and shall have
no interest in the proceeds of any policy secured by the City for the protection of its property. TheCityandDistrictherebywaivethesubrogationprovisionsofanyinsurancepolicyissuedtoeither
covering any casualty arising out of the ownership, use, maintenance or operation of either
building or premises, but only to the extent such policy permits such a waiver.
VIII. Liability Insurance: The District shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
Agreement,insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise
from or in connection with the District's repair, maintenance, use and/or operation of any of theDistrict's Pasco branches.
The City shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against
claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with
the City's repair, maintenance,use and/or operation of the Main Branch facility,the Martin LutherKingCenterBranchfacility, and the Substitute West Branch Facility. The aforementioned
insurance requirements of the City shall be fulfilled by the City's membership and coverage in the
Washington Cities Insurance Authority (VCIA), a self-insured municipal insurance pool.
Nothing stated herein shall obligate a party to perform repairs or maintenance that saidpartyisnototherwiserequiredtoperform.
No Limitation: Maintenance of the insurance policies as required by the Agreement shall
not be construed to limit the liability of either party to the coverage provided by such insurance,
or otherwise limit the recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity.
A. Minimum Sco e of Insurance. Each party shall obtain insurance of the
type described below:
l. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on
Insurance Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 O1 and shall cover
premises and contractual liability. The City shall be named as an insured on
District's Commercial General Liability insurance policy using ISO Additional
Insured-Managers or Lessors of Premises Form CG 20 11 or a substitute
endorsement providing equivalent coverage.
2. Property insurance shall be written on an all risk basis.
Page 97 of 276
B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Each party shall maintain Commercial
General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence,
2,000,000 general aggregate.
C. Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be
endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Commercial General Liability insurance:
1. The District's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with
respect to the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage
maintained by the City shall be excess of the District's insurance and shall not
contribute with it.
2. Each party's insurance shall be endorsed such that coverage shall
not be cancelled, except after thirty(30) days prior written notice by certified mail,
return receipt requested, has been given to the other party. However, each party
may change insurance companies without notice to the other party so long as there
is no lapse in coverage and all other insurance requirements of this Agreement are
satisfied.
D. Acce tabilit of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best rating of not less than A: VII.
E. Verification of Covera e. Each party shall furnish the other with original
certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsement, including but not necessarily
limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of
this Agreement.
F. Waiver of Subrot,ation. District and City hereby release and discharge each
other from all claims, losses and liabilities arising from or caused by any hazard covered
by property insurance on or in connection with the premises or said building. This release
shall apply only to the extent that such claim, loss or liability is covered by insurance.
G. The aforementioned insurance requirements of the City shall be fulfilled by
the City's membership and coverage in the Washington Cities Insurance Authority
WCIA), a self-insured municipal insurance pool.
IX. Indemnification.
A. The District shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials,employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, suits, actions,or liabilities
for injury or death of any person,or for loss or damage to property,which arises out of the District's
repair, maintenance, use and/or operation of the Pasco branches, or from the conduct of the
District's business, or from any activity, work or thing done,permitted, or suffered by District, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers whose acts or omissions are the proximate cause of
Page 98 of 276
the claimed damage, except only such injury or damage shall have been occasioned by the solenegligenceoftheCity.
B. The City shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the District, its officers,
officials,employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, suits, actions,or liabilities
for injury or death of any person, or for loss of damage to property, which arises of out the City's
repair,maintenance, use and/or operation of the Pasco branches, or from the conduct of the City'sbusiness, ar from any activity, work, or thing done,permitted or suffered, by the City, its officers,
officials,employees and volunteers whose acts or omissions are the proximate cause of the claimed
damage, except only such injury or damage as shall have been occasioned by the sole negligenceoftheDistrict.
X. Contract Fee: The parties have agreed to transition to a per capita-based Contract
Fee by which to compensate the District for the aforementioned services over a period of 1.5 years.
The new Per Capita Contract Fee (PCCF) is determined by dividing the annual assessed taxes
assessed valuation x District levy rate] of the MCL-annexed property within the City ofKennewickbythetotalpopulationofsaidareatodevelopapercapitarate, then multiplied by the
then-current population of the City. Population will be as determined by the most recent official
population as published by the Washington State Office of Financial Management.
This transition will occur as follows:
1) The 2022 annual fee shall be adjusted effective July 1, 2022, through December 31,
2022, based on the formulae described above, as follows: The City agrees to pay the
District monthly payments in the amount of$170,998 for this period, representing theimplementationofanincreaseequalto33% of the PCCF fee calculation differential.
Exhibit A illustrates how the fee shall be calculated for the remainder of 2022, and
provides an example of the basis by which the fee shall be calculated thereafter.
2) Commencing January 1, 2023, the City agrees to pay the District an annual fee based
on an increase to 66% of the PCCF fee calculation differential as adjusted for 2023.
3) Commencing January 1, 2024, the City agrees to pay the District an annual fee basedon100% of the PCCF for 2024, and thereafter, the City shall compensate the District
the per capita-based Contract Fee for each subsequent year during the entire term of
this Agreement.
With the exception of payments made in 2022 (which shall be paid in accordance with
section (1) above), the City shall pay each year's fee to the District in 12 equal monthlyinstallments. Each installment shall be paid by the last day of the month in which it becomes due.
Page 99 of 276
In the event that the monthly installment payment is not paid by the last day of the month
in which it is due, then in addition thereto, as a late charge, the City agrees to pay 1%per month
of the delinquent installment for each month delinquent until paid.
XI. Term of Agreement: Unless earlier terminated, this Agreement shall end
December 31, 2032. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may terminate this Agreement to
take effect not less than eighteen(18)months from the date of written notification or immediately
upon annexation of the City into the District. Upon termination, except in case of annexation, all
alterations, improvements, additions, or fixtures made by District to the main branch, other than
District's property, shall become the property of the City and be surrendered with the premises.
XII. Renegotiation: At any time during the last five years of the contract, either party
may request renegotiation of one or more terms of the contract by providing advance written
request to the other party. Such notice shall cite the basis for the request in sufficient detail to
provide the other party a reasonable understanding of the scope of the requested negotiation. The
only obligation created by such notice shall be the obligation to meet and discuss, in good faith,
the basis for the request; however, neither party shall be under any obligation to amend this
Agreement.
XIIL Interlocal Cooperation Act Provisions: No special budget or funds are
anticipated, nor shall be created. It is not intended that a separate legal entity be established to
conduct this cooperative undertaking,nor is the acquiring,holding,or disposing of real or personal
property contemplated,other than as specifically provided within the terms of this Agreement. The
City Manager of the City and the Executive Director of the District shall be designated as the
Administrators of this Interlocal Agreement.
This Agreement shall be filed with the Franklin County Auditor, or alternatively listed by
subject on either Party's website or other electronically retrievable public source.
XIV. Annexation: During the term of the Agreement,upon the written request of either
party, the parties agree to meet and evaluate, in good faith, the potential annexation of the City
into the District, In the event the city determines to initiate a ballot measure for annexation into
the District, the District agrees to provide timely public information upon request by the City.
XV. Miscellaneous:
A. Waiver. The parties agree that time is of the essence of each and every provision
contained herein and no waiver of any breach of any condition or covenant shall waive any other
condition or covenant or any future breach.
B. Illegality. The parties agree that if any provision of the Agreement is declared
illegal or violative of the law,the remaining provisions thereof shall remain in full force and affect.
Page 100 of 276
C. Entire A reement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and
supersedes and replaces any and all prior or contemporaneous agreements or understandings,
written or oral, express or implied, between the parties concerning the subject matter of this
Agreement.
D. Modification. This Agreement shall not be subject to modification except by
written agreement signed by the parties.
E. Cooperation. The parties agree to fully cooperate in all matters related to or arising
out of this Agreement.
F. Scrutinv, This Agreement has been submitted to the scrutiny of the parties and their
respective legal counsel and shall be given a fair and reasonable interpretation in accordance with
the words hereof without consideration or weight being given to its being drafted by or for one of
the parties.
XVI. Dispute Resolution: Should any dispute arise concerning the interpretation,
enforcement, breach or default of this Agreement, the parties shall first meet in good faith and
attempt to resolve or mediate the dispute. In the event it remains unresolved by mediation, the
dispute shall be resolved by final and binding arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, the Mandatory
Rules of Arbitration, but with no right of appeal. The arbitration shall be conducted by a single
arbitrator selected by mutual agreement of the parties or, failing such agreement, the arbitrator
shall be selected by the then presiding judge of the Franklin County Superior Court. Venue for
such arbitration shall be placed in Franklin County, Washington, and the prevailing party shall be
awarded its attorney fees and costs as additional judgment against the other.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the said District and the said City have caused this contract
and agreement to be executed by their respective officers on the day and year first written above.
MID-COLUMBIA LIBRARIES CITY OF PASCO
B1y: _ - By:y
yle':, Executive Director Dave Za , ' Manager
Attested to by: Attested to by:
1, y,
Erin Meneely, Operatio 'rector Debby Barham, CMC, City Clerk
Page 101 of 276
Exhibit A
Calculations for City Cost of Service July 2022-December 2023
Montlily Payment
Annual Divisor:l2 Divisor:6 Total
2022ContractedRate(January-June) $ 1,557,224.76 S I29,7G8,73 $ 129,768.73
100%of PCCF-2022 $ 2,306,853.54 $ 192,237.79 $
Difference $ 749,628.78 $62,469.06 $
33% ofDifference $ 247,377.50 $20,614.79 S 41,219,58
2022 ContractedRate(July-December) S 1,804,b02.26 $ 129,768.73 $41,229.58 5 170,99831
2023 ContractedRate(January-June) $ 1,557,224.76 S 1Z9,?G$.73 $ 129,768.73
100%ofPCCF-2023(Estimate) $ 2,358,483.69 $ 196,54031 $
Difference(Estimate) $ 801,258.93 $ 66,771.58 $
66%ofDifj`'erence(Estimate) $ 528,830.90 S 4a,Of 9.24 $
2023 Contracted Rate(Estimare) S 2,086ASS.b6 173,837.97 $ S 173,83Z.97
2022 Note:Pasco is cunently paying$129,768.73 per month perthe e iring II.A.In current proposallanguage,MCL is asldng for 33%of
the difference between the cunent fee and the calculated 2022 per capita fee.As the succes sor agreement is intended to go into effect July
1,33%of the difference($247,377.50)would be applied towards the remaining sixmonths ofpayments,or$41,229.58 per month,in addition
to the$129,768.73.6 months @$129,768.73+6 months @ 170,99831=$1,804,602.26.
2023(Fsfimate)Note:The 2023 contracted rate estimate is provided forplanning purposes;we can anticipate a smallvariance based on
TBD actuals.Fstimate is based on prcvious years'assessed valuation growth and corresponding district levy change.Population for2023
PCCF calculation for both Kennewick and Pasco is already]rnown.
Page 102 of 276
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 13, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 8/18/25
FROM: Haylie Miller, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Public Hearing & Ordinance No. 4782 - Big Sky Developers, LLC -
Easement Vacation (VAC2025-001) (5 minute staff presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Ordinance
Exhibit A Survey
AFN 530326
AFN 487139
Easement Vacation Petition
Vicinity Map
Resolution 4621 Setting Meeting Date and Time for Public Hearing for
VAC2025-001
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4782, vacating the eastern three feet
of the easement established by Auditor's File Number 487139, originally
granted by the Northern Pacific Railway Company and, further, authorize
publication by summary only.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Historical records show that a 60-foot-wide county road was originally
established through a 1909 petition and a 1910 consent from the Northern
Pacific Railway Company, both officially recorded. On June 3, 2025, Big Sky
Developers, LLC submitted a petition to vacate a portion of this easement,
Page 103 of 276
which affects Parcel Nos. 114330052 and 114330053, identified as Lot 2 and
Lot 3 of a previously approved plat exemption.
Notice of this public hearing, which encouraged public testimony, was provided
in accordance with PMC 12.40.050(3)(a) through (d). On July 18, 2025, notice
was mailed to the owner of each parcel abutting the easement, as listed in the
official records of Franklin County, as well as to all property owners within 300
feet of the easement boundary. That same day, notice was also posted in three
public locations within the City—two at City Hall and one at the Mid-Columbia
Library in West Pasco, located at the corner of Wrigley Drive and Road 76—as
well as in a conspicuous location on the easement proposed for vacation.
Additionally, notice was published in the Tri-City Herald on July 20, 2025.
Currently, the existing easement encroaches approximately 2.5 feet into the
rear yards of residential properties within the Glacier Park/Desert Flats
subdivision. To address this issue and ensure clarity in the property records
moving forward, the petitioners are requesting the vacation of the eastern three
feet of the easement. On July 7, 2025, City Council adopted Resolution No.
4621, setting a public hearing for 7:00 PM on Monday, August 18, 2025, to
consider the proposed easement vacation.
V. DISCUSSION:
In evaluating the proposed easement vacation, consideration has been given
to the criteria outlined in PMC Section 12.40.070 (1) through (4).
1. The proposed vacation of the eastern three feet of the easement will not
adversely affect traffic accessibility or circulation in the immediate area or
across the City. It’s important to note that the easement in question has not
been developed for public use—it does not currently function as a public road,
nor does it support vehicular or pedestrian traffic in any form. As such, its
removal will have no practical impact on mobility or circulation patterns.
2. This segment of the easement is not identified for any future public use.
There are no existing or planned infrastructure projects that rely on this area for
access, utilities, or public right-of-way. Instead, the City’s Transportation
System Plan identifies Convention Drive as a future collector roadway with an
80-foot-wide corridor. That alignment, which lies outside the area proposed for
vacation, is sufficient to accommodate all anticipated transportation and utility
needs in this location.
3. The vacation will also not result in any properties becoming landlocked or
inaccessible. All surrounding parcels will retain both legal and physical access
from existing and future public streets. No new access easements are required,
and no changes to public or private roadways are anticipated as a result of this
Page 104 of 276
action.
4. From a public interest standpoint, the proposed vacation is beneficial. By
removing an unused and unnecessary portion of the easement, the City helps
clarify property boundaries and eliminate a technical encroachment into the
rear yards of several residential lots within the Glacier Park/Desert Flats
subdivision. This improves the accuracy of land records and contributes to
clear title for affected homeowners, ultimately promoting orderly development
and reducing future title or permitting complications.
Furthermore, pursuant to PMC 12.40.030 and 12.40.120, the City and City
Council may require a signed agreement from the petitioners to cover the cost
of an appraisal and to compensate the City for the area to be vacated.
However, these requirements may be waived in whole or in part.
In this case, staff recommends that both the appraisal and compensation
requirements be waived based on two key considerations: (1) the vacation is
offset by the grant of substitute public right-of-way, which holds an equivalent
or greater value as a public asset; and (2) the overall benefit to the community
resulting from the development project requiring the vacation outweighs the
appraised value of the easement to be vacated.
Accordingly, staff will not be requesting appraisal or compensation in this case.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the proposed easement vacation be adopted and that
the requirement for appraisal and compensation be waived. This
recommendation is based on the need to facilitate orderly and proper
development of the affected properties and to eliminate a technical
encroachment that could otherwise complicate permitting and construction.
Additionally, the vacation will help reduce potential City liability associated with
retaining an unused and unnecessary easement.
Page 105 of 276
Ordinance - Easement Vacation (VAC 2025-001) 1
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF:
City of Pasco, Washington
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Pasco, Washington
Attn: City Clerk
525 North 3rd Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDINANCE NO. 4782
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
VACATING THE EASTERN THREE FEET OF THE EASEMENT
ESTABLISHED BY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 487139, ORIGINALLY
GRANTED BY THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY.
WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the
general interest of the City, the City Council may vacate easements; and
WHEREAS, a petition for vacating the eastern three feet of the easement established by
Auditor’s File Number 487139, originally granted by the Northern Pacific Railway Company has
been submitted to the City by owners of more than two-thirds of the properties abutting the portion
of the easement to be vacated per Pasco Municipal Code (PMC); and
WHEREAS, on July 7, 2025, pursuant to PMC Section 12.40.040, the City passed
Resolution No. 4621, initiating the vacation procedures and setting a public hearing for the
proposed vacation; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to PMC Section 12.40.050, appropriate notice was given of the
City’s intent to vacate the easement; and
WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing on the proposed vacation on August 18, 2025;
and
WHEREAS, the vacation process provided in PMC Chapter 12.40 requires a title report,
and an appraisal of value and compensation unless waived by the City Council; and
Page 106 of 276
Ordinance - Easement Vacation (VAC 2025-001) 2
WHEREAS, pursuant to PMC Section 12.40.120(2) the City may waive the requirement
for a title report, an appraisal of value and compensation if one or more of the following are
applicable: the vacation is initiated by Council Resolution; the vacation is at the request of the
City; the Council had previously determined that the right-of-way is not essential to public traffic
circulation and is available for vacation; the grant of a substitute right-of-way has value as a right-
of-way at least equal to the right-of-way to be vacated; or the resulting benefit to the community
of the project requiring the vacation outweighs the appraised value of the easement to be vacated;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed vacation does meet the above listed criteria for waiver of the
requirements for an appraisal of value, and compensation pursuant to PMC Section 12.40.120(2)
as it was acquired without cost to the City and the resulting benefit to the community, in terms of
increased traffic safety as a direct result of safer turn radius, will outweigh any value of the vacated
easement; and
WHEREAS, the City Council may approve an easement vacation upon making findings
pursuant to PMC Section 12.40.070(1)-(4), that the vacation of the easement will not adversely
affect traffic accessibility and circulation within the immediate area or with the City as a whole;
the right of way is not contemplated or needed for future use; no abutting property will become
landlocked or have access substantially impaired; and the public needs shall not be adversely
affected and the vacation will provide a public benefit or serve a public purpose; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the required criteria of the PMC Section
12.40.070(1)-(4) have been met; and
WHEREAS, all steps and procedures required by law to vacate said easement have been
duly taken and performed.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the eastern three feet of the easement established by Auditor’s File
Number 487139, originally granted by the Northern Pacific Railway Company, as described below
and as depicted in Exhibit A be and the same is hereby vacated;
PARCEL NO. 114330052 AND 114330053
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOTS 2 AND 3 AS DEPICTED AND DESCRIBED
ON RECORD OF SURVEY FOR PLAT EXEMPTION RECORDED IN
VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGE 327, UNDER AUDITOR’S FILE
NUMBER 1964751, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON
LYING WITHIN THE EAST 3.00 FEET OF THE WEST 30.00 FEET OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29
EAST.
Page 107 of 276
Ordinance - Easement Vacation (VAC 2025-001) 3
Comprising approximately 4,155 square feet (0.1 acres)
Section 2. That pursuant to PMC Chapter 12.40, the City Council waives the
requirements for an appraisal, and compensation for the vacated easement.
Section 3. That a certified copy of this Ordinance be recorded by the City Clerk of the
City of Pasco in and with the office of the Auditor of Franklin County, Washington.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word
of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any
other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this Ordinance, including scrivener’s errors
or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulation s; or
numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days
after approval, passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this 18th day of August,
2025.
_____________________________
David Milne
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Published: _____________________________
Page 108 of 276
N
5804 Road 90,
Suite H,
Pasco, WA 99301
509.380.5883 TEL
509.380.5885 FAX
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 109 of 276
Page 110 of 276
Page 111 of 276
Page 112 of 276
Pa
g
e
1
1
3
o
f
2
7
6
Page 114 of 276
Community & Economic Development Department
PO Box 293, 525 N 3rd Ave, Pasco, WA 99301
P: 509.545.3441 / F: 509.545.3499
Fee: $300
Updated April 2019
CITY OF PASCO
STREET/ALLEY/EASEMENT VACATION PETITION
Master File # Date Submitted:
We the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately-owned abutting property, hereby petition
the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the following described street/alley rights-of-way:
Applicant/
Owner 1
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
Signature:
Owner 2
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
Signature:
(Please see reverse side)
FROM THE OFF SET NE CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF CONVENTION DRIVE AND BURNS
RD TRAVELING NORTH TO THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF CONVENTION DRIVE AND KAU
TRAIL AND BEYOND. THE APPROXIMATE DISTANCE IS 1,385' AND A TOTAL WIDTH OF 3'.
Brad Seabaugh
5810 Midland Ln, Unit 65 Pasco, WA 99301
(509) 491-5001
brad.seabaugh@fsbwa.com
Docusign Envelope ID: 9A75117F-F768-44A2-BB42-A2EE4A3FB84C
Page 115 of 276
Owner 3
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
Signature:
Survey Title Report
(if not waived)
Fee of $300
4 4 4
Docusign Envelope ID: 9A75117F-F768-44A2-BB42-A2EE4A3FB84C
Page 116 of 276
R
o
a
d
7
0
N
K a u T r a i l R d
P o l a r D r
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
io
n
D
r
S a n d s t o n e D r
T a r n D r
K a u T r a i l R d
R
o
a
d
6
4
G
l
a
c
i
e
r
L
n
C
a
s
h
m
e
r
e
L
n
M i s s i o n R i d g e D r
Ro
a
d
71
N
S
k
e
e
n
a
L
n
Basalt Falls Dr
Ro
a
d
6
4
Ri
o
G
r
a
n
d
e
L
n
Polar Dr
Robe
r
t
W
a
y
n
e
D
r
Ar
c
t
i
c
L
n
Glacier
L
n
Oc
h
o
c
o
L
n
Cash
m
e
r
e
L
n
Penrose Point Dr
Mission Ridge Dr
Crooked River Ct
Maryhill
Ln
M elody Ln
Beac
o
n
R
o
c
k
L
n
Wa
s
h
o
u
g
a
l
L
n
We
s
t
p
o
r
t
L
n
Rogue Dr
Arete Dr
Sandstone Dr
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
D
r
Tarn Dr
Kau Trail Rd
Ro
a
d
7
0
N
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
0 340 680 1,000 1,400170
Feet
Vicinity
Map
SITE
Item: Easement Vacation - East 3' of AFN 487139
Applicant(s): Brad Seabaugh
File #: VAC 2025-001 ±
Pa
g
e
1
1
7
o
f
2
7
6
Resolution Setting PH for Easement Vacation (VAC 2025-001) - 1
RESOLUTION NO. 4621
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
SETTING 7:00 PM, AUGUST 18, 2025, AS THE TIME AND DATE FOR A
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF THE EASTERN
THREE FEET OF THE EASEMENT ESTABLISHED BY AUDITOR’S FILE
NUMBER 487139, ORIGINALLY GRANTED BY THE NORTHERN PACIFIC
RAILWAY COMPANY..
WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the
general interest of the City of Pasco, the City Council may vacate easements relating to street,
pedestrian, or travel purposes; and
WHEREAS, a petition for vacation of the eastern three feet of the easement established
by Auditor’s File Number 487139, originally granted by the Northern Pacific Railway Company
by owners of two-thirds of the property underlying the portion of the easement to be vacated has
been submitted to the City; and
WHEREAS, the vacation process, by petition application, provided in the Pasco
Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter 12.40 requires a survey, title report, an appraisal of value, and
compensation unless waived by City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City may waive the requirements for a survey pursuant to PMC Section
12.40.110 if the location and legal description of the street or alley proposed for vacation is
sufficiently known to the City such that an accurate legal description can be determined with
certainty without a survey; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to PMC Section 12.40.120, compensation for vacated rights-of-
way, an appraisal and title report may be waived if one or more of the following are applicable:
the vacation is initiated by Council Resolution; the vacation is at the request of the City; the right-
of-way to be vacated was previously determined by Council not to be essential to public traffic
circulation and is available for vacation; the grant of a substitute right-of-way has value as a right-
of-way at least equal to the right-of-way to be vacated; or the resulting benefit to the community
of the project requiring vacation outweighs the appraised value of the right-of-way to be vacated;
and
WHEREAS, the City staff is requesting that Council make a determination concerning
whether to waive the requirements of a title report, appraisal of value, and compensation pursuant
to PMC 12.40.120(2) after holding a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, PMC Section 12.40.040 requires public hearings on vacations to be fixed by
resolution, and to provide notice for such hearing which shall occur no later than sixty (60) days
after, nor earlier than twenty (20) days after, the passage of this Resolution setting a public hearing.
Page 118 of 276
Resolution Setting PH for Easement Vacation (VAC 2025-001) - 2
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
Notice of Hearing. That a public hearing to consider vacating the following as described
below and depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto, will be held before City Council of the City of
Pasco in the Council Chambers at 525 N. Third Avenue, Pasco, Washington at the hour of 7:00
p.m., on the 18th day of August 2025:
EASEMENT VACATION
PARCEL NO. 114330052 AND 114330053
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOTS 2 AND 3 AS DEPICTED AND DESCRIBED
ON RECORD OF SURVEY FOR PLAT EXEMPTION RECORDED IN
VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGE 327, UNDER AUDITOR’S FILE
NUMBER 1964751, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON
LYING WITHIN THE EAST 3.00 FEET OF THE WEST 30.00 FEET OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29
EAST.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk of the City of Pasco give notice of said public
hearing as required by law.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Council will decide whether to waive the
requirements for an appraisal, title report, and compensation after the August 18, 2025, public
hearing.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this 7th day of July,
2025.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
David Milne
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
Debra Barham, MMC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 119 of 276
N
5804 Road 90,
Suite H,
Pasco, WA 99301
509.380.5883 TEL
509.380.5885 FAX
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 120 of 276
Pasco City Council
August 18, 2025
Regular Meeting
Pa
g
e
1
2
1
o
f
2
7
6
Public Hearing &
Ordinance for
Big Sky Developers, LLC
vacating the eastern 3’ of
previously established
Convention Drive
alignment easement-
VAC2025-001August18,2025
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
1
2
2
o
f
2
7
6
Table of Contents
01
02
PMC
Vicinity Map
Pa
g
e
1
2
3
o
f
2
7
6
VAC 2025-001 Big Sky Developers, LLC
Easement Vacation Ordinance
PMC 12.40.070 Criteria
City Council Vacation Approval Criteria
The City Council considers the following when reviewing a vacation petition:
1.Traffic Circulation
The vacation must not negatively impact traffic accessibility or circulation in the area or the City as a whole.
2.Future Public Use
The right-of-way must not be planned or needed for future public purposes.
3.Property Access
No adjacent property should become landlocked or experience significantly reduced access as a result of the vacation.
4.Public Interest
The vacation must not harm public needs and should offer a public benefit or serve a public purpose.
PMC 12.40.120 Compensation and Appraisal
Compensation for the vacated area and an appraisal may be waived in whole or in part
• A larger and more valuable substitute public right-of-way is being provided in place of the existing
easement. Its infrastructure value significantly exceeds that of the portion proposed for vacation, supporting
the rationale for waiving appraisal and compensation requirements.
• Furthermore, the public benefit generated by the associated project exceeds the appraised value of the
easement to be vacated—again supporting the case for waiving appraisal and compensation.
Pa
g
e
1
2
4
o
f
2
7
6
Proposed Big Sky Developers, LLC Easement
Vacation
Pa
g
e
1
2
5
o
f
2
7
6
Questions?
Thank you!
Haylie Miller
Pa
g
e
1
2
6
o
f
2
7
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 14, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 8/18/25
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4639 - Providing Notice of Termination Between Mid-
Columbia Libraries and City of Pasco
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution
Interlocal Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: City the authorizing 4639, No. I approve to move Resolution
Manager to serve a notice of termination of the Interlocal Cooperation
Agreement between the City of Pasco and Mid-Columbia Libraries.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Annual - Approximately $3.0 million
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City of Pasco currently contracts with Mid-Columbia Libraries (MCL) to
provide library services. These services are funded through the City's General
Fund, with a budgeted amount of $2.53 million for 2025 and $2.78 million for
2026. MCL and City the both have prior in highlighted As discussion,
expressed interest in examining alternative methods of providing library
services. One potential option under consideration is annexation into the MCL
district.
The current Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with MCL for library services is in effect
from 2022 to 2032. Given that both the City and MCL are interested in
exploring alternative options for providing library services to the community,
including potential annexation by MCL, this resolution provides for an 18-month
notice of termination. This extended notice period will allow both the City and
MCL to thoroughly explore alternative service models and ensure a smooth
Page 127 of 276
transition, regardless of the outcome.
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the
City Manager to serve a notice of termination of the interlocal cooperation
agreement between the City of Pasco and Mid-Columbia Libraries.
Page 128 of 276
Resolution - Mid-Columbia Libraries ILA - 1
RESOLUTION NO. ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SERVE A NOTICE OF
TERMINATION OF THE INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF PASCO AND MID-COLUMBIA LIBRARIES.
WHEREAS, RCW 39.34, INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT, authorizes political
subdivisions to jointly exercise their powers, privileges, or authorities with other political
subdivisions of this State through the execution of an interlocal cooperative or interagency
agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco ("City") and Mid-Columbia Libraries ("MCL") have a
long-standing Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (ILA) for the provision of library services, with
the current Agreement in effect from 2022 to 2032; and
WHEREAS, the City's current method of funding library services is through a negotiated
contract with MCL, with a budgeted amount of $2.53 million in 2025 and $2.78 million in 2026,
which is paid from the City's General Fund; and
WHEREAS, both parties desire to explore alternative options for providing library
services, such as an annexation; and
WHEREAS, the termination of the current ILA is a necessary step to facilitate the
exploration and potential transition to a new service model, allowing both the City and MCL to
move forward with new funding and governance structures; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of the current ILA, the City of Pasco is required to provide
written notice at least 18 months before termination of the parties’ agreement will take effect; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to provide an 18-month
notice of termination to ensure a smooth and orderly transition in compliance with the terms of the
parties’ agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves termination of the Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement between the City of Pasco and Mid-Columbia Libraries; a copy of which
is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to prepare, execute, and serve a written Notice of
Page 129 of 276
Resolution - Mid-Columbia Libraries ILA - 2
Termination of the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Pasco and Mid-
Columbia Libraries on behalf of the City of Pasco, in compliance with the terms of the parties’
agreement.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
David Milne
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 130 of 276
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF PASCO AND
MID-COLUMBIA LIBRARIES
THIS INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT, hereinafter referred to as the
"Agreement", for library services is entered into by and between the City of Pasco, Washington,
hereinafter referred to as "City", and the Mid-Columbia Libraries, hereinafter referred to as
"District", on this '3 / ~ day of , h:-l{t , 2022.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, District and the City are authorized by RCW 39.34.030(1) to enter into this
Agreement for the purpose of providing library services to the citizens of the City of Pasco, and
District is authorized pursuant to RCW 27 .12.180 to render library services to the City providing
to the citizens of the City the same library privileges as those provided for residents of District's
library district; and
WHEREAS, the District and the City have been operating successfully under a Contract
dated June 7, 2010, extended by an agreement dated October 20, 2020, and subsequently extended
by an agreement dated November 22, 2021, and whereby Resolution No. 4195, extended the ILA
through July 30, 2022, whereby the District has furnished complete library service to the City in
return for funds provided by the City; and
WHEREAS, for the mutual benefit of all, and to give the best library service to the greatest
number of people at the most reasonable cost, and to make it convenient for the City residents to
use library books and other materials by making the most economical use of available funds
through the centralization of supervision and the purchase of supplies, books and other library
materials and equipment; NOW THEREFORE,
IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows:
I. Termination of Prior Contract: The contract dated June 7, 2010, and its
subsequent extensions now in effect between District and the City shall be terminated as of June
30, 2022, and superseded by this Agreement with an effective date of July 1, 2022.
II. General Conditions: The District agrees that it shall make available to the
residents of Pasco the resources and library services generally available throughout the Library
District, and except as otherwise provided in Section VI herein, to the extent deemed reasonable
and equitable by the District in view of its district-wide service responsibilities . The District further
agrees that the residents of the City are entitled to, and shall receive the same library privileges as
are provided to all residents of the District.
Page 131 of 276
III. Library Materials: In the provision of books and non-print materials by the
District, the collection for a community library shall depend on the population served, the shelf
space available, the use made of the materials, and the funds available in the district-wide materials
budget. The District has the sole responsibility for the selection and maintenance of such materials.
In addition, the District shall make all decisions regarding disposition of gifted materials and
equipment. Regulations governing the use of the library and its collection will be set by the District.
IV. Library Staff: The District shall provide competent and qualified staff suitable for
rendering library services to the public and shall have sole responsibility for all personnel
administration, including selection, training, discipline and other personnel administrative
functions.
V. Operated Facilities
A. Pasco Library -Main Branch: District shall have full use of the existing
library facility located at 1320 West Hopkins, Pasco, Washington, for the operation of a
public library and for no other purpose, and shall take all reasonable precautions to prevent
damage, injury, or loss by reason of or related to the operation of the library. The District
shall also have use of the furnishings, shelving, and counters, including such replacement
and additional furnishings, equipment and materials purchased by the City.
The facility shall be jointly managed with District having complete authority over
the library services rendered. The City, at its sole expense, will repair and maintain the
facility, including HVAC, heating, air conditioning, plumbing, water, lights, and
reasonable janitorial service and grounds maintenance. The City will also pay for all utility
services, including power, water, sewer, and garbage collection, except for cable and
internet. Notwithstanding the forgoing, District shall be liable for damages to the premises
caused intentionally, negligently, or from misuse by District's employees.
District shall not make any alterations, additions, improvements, utility installation
(including power panels) to the premises without the prior written consent of the City,
which consent will not be unreasonably withheld.
The City may utilize meeting space in the Main Branch, and the City meeting uses
will have priority over non-District users. Scheduling shall be coordinated with the
designated library staff, so as not to interfere with the District's normal operations of the
library.
During the term of this Agreement, and any renewal thereof, the Library shall be
identified by exterior lettering as: "Pasco Library Operated by Mid-Columbia Libraries. "
B. Pasco Library -West Branch: The District agrees to rent, staff and
maintain a West Pasco Branch Library at no direct cost to the City, and on such terms as
Page 132 of 276
are agreeable to the District. The parties understand that this is a temporary measure until
the City is able to provide the District with a substitute facility (hereinafter the "Substitute
West Branch Facility"). The size, location and operating hours of the West Pasco Branch
Library will be determined by the District after consultation with the City. The District
shall have complete authority over the library services rendered at the West Branch.
District and City agree to enter commence a feasibility study and mutual planning
for a new West Branch facility within one ( 1) year from the commencement of this
agreement.
During the term of this Agreement, and any renewal thereof, the West Pasco
Library shall be identified by exterior lettering as: "West Pasco Library Operated by Mid-
Columbia Libraries," or as mutually agreed upon by the parties.
C. Pasco Library -Martin Luther King Center Branch: The City shall
provide an enclosed, lockable space within the Martin Luther King Center, located at 205
S. Wehe, of suitable size and layout for the operation of a public library. The District shall
have complete authority over the library services rendered at the Martin Luther King Center
Branch, and will staff, stock, and operate the Martin Luther King Center Branch, including
dedicated public computers.
The City, at its sole expense, will repair and maintain the facility, including HV AC,
heating, air conditioning, plumbing, water, lights, and reasonable janitorial service and
grounds maintenance. The City will also pay for all utility services, including power, water,
sewer, and garbage collection, except for cable and internet. Notwithstanding the forgoing,
District shall be liable for damages to the premises caused intentionally, negligently, or
from misuse by District's employees.
District shall not make any alterations, additions, improvements, utility installation
(including power panels) to the premises without the prior written consent of the City,
which consent will not be unreasonably withheld.
VI. Hours of Service: Regular hours of service will be determined by the District,
taking into account the population served, the use made of the facilities, and the funds available in
the district-wide staff budget, provided, however, the contract fee specified in Section X shall
entitle the City to a minimum of 100 hours total per week of scheduled service among all branches
combined, however, service to the Main Branch shall be not less than 40 hours per week, and
service at the Martin Luther King Center Branch, when opened, shall be not less than 20 hours per
week. Any reduction in the schedule of service below the foregoing hours shall require written
agreement of the parties.
VII. Fire and All Risk Insurance: The City shall maintain, at its sole expense, fire and
all risk casualty insurance upon the premises of the Main Branch, the Martin Luther King Center
Page 133 of 276
Branch, and the Substitute West Branch Facility as part of its existing blanket insurance policies
for full replacement value, together with all City owned furnishings, equipment, and materials
therein. The District shall procure and, maintain at its expense such insurance as it deems necessary
for the coverage of its materials , equipment, and supplies at the Main Branch, West Pasco
Branch/Substitute West Branch Facility, and Martin Luther King Center Branch, and shall have
no interest in the proceeds of any policy secured by the City for the protection of its property. The
City and District hereby waive the subrogation provisions of any insurance policy issued to either
covering any casualty arising out of the ownership, use, maintenance or operation of either
building or premises, but only to the extent such policy permits such a waiver.
VIII. Liability Insurance: The District shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise
from or in connection with the District's repair, maintenance, use and/or operation of any of the
District's Pasco branches .
The City shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against
claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with
the City's repair, maintenance, use and/or operation of the Main Branch facility, the Martin Luther
King Center Branch facility, and the Substitute West Branch Facility. The aforementioned
insurance requirements of the City shall be fulfilled by the City's membership and coverage in the
Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA), a self-insured municipal insurance pool.
Nothing stated herein shall obligate a party to perform repairs or maintenance that said
party is not otherwise required to perform.
No Limitation: Maintenance of the insurance policies as required by the Agreement shall
not be construed to limit the liability of either party to the coverage provided by such insurance,
or otherwise limit the recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity.
A. Minimum Sco pe of Insurance. Each party shall obtain insurance of the
type described below:
1. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on
Insurance Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover
premises and contractual liability. The City shall be named as an insured on
District's Commercial General Liability insurance policy using ISO Additional
Insured-Managers or Lessors of Premises Form CG 20 11 or a substitute
endorsement providing equivalent coverage.
2. Property insurance shall be written on an all risk basis .
Page 134 of 276
B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Each party shall maintain Commercial
General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence,
$2,000,000 general aggregate.
C. Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be
endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Commercial General Liability insurance:
1. The District's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with
respect to the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage
maintained by the City shall be excess of the District's insurance and shall not
contribute with it.
2. Each party's insurance shall be endorsed such that coverage shall
not be cancelled, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail,
return receipt requested, has been given to the other party. However, each party
may change insurance companies without notice to the other party so long as there
is no lapse in coverage and all other insurance requirements of this Agreement are
satisfied.
D. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best rating of not less than A: VII.
E. Verification of Coverage. Each party shall furnish the other with original
certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsement, including but not necessarily
limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of
this Agreement.
F. Waiver of Subrogation. District and City hereby release and discharge each
other from all claims, losses and liabilities arising from or caused by any hazard covered
by property insurance on or in connection with the premises or said building. This release
shall apply only to the extent that such claim, loss or liability is covered by insurance.
G. The aforementioned insurance requirements of the City shall be fulfilled by
the City's membership and coverage in the Washington Cities Insurance Authority
(WCIA), a self-insured municipal insurance pool.
IX. Indemnification.
A. The District shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers ,
officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, or liabilities
for injury or death of any person, or for loss or damage to property, which arises out of the District's
repair, maintenance, use and/or operation of the Pasco branches, or from the conduct of the
District's business, or from any activity, work or thing done, permitted, or suffered by District, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers whose acts or omissions are the proximate cause of
Page 135 of 276
the claimed damage, except only such injury or damage shall have been occasioned by the sole
negligence of the City.
B. The City shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the District, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, or liabilities
for injury or death of any person, or for loss of damage to property, which arises of out the City's
repair, maintenance, use and/or operation of the Pasco branches, or from the conduct of the City's
business, or from any activity, work, or thing done, permitted or suffered, by the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers whose acts or omissions are the proximate cause of the claimed
damage, except only such injury or damage as shall have been occasioned by the sole negligence
of the District.
X. Contract Fee: The parties have agreed to transition to a per capita-based Contract
Fee by which to compensate the District for the aforementioned services over a period of 1.5 years.
The new Per Capita Contract Fee (PCCF) is determined by dividing the annual assessed taxes
[assessed valuation x District levy rate] of the MCL-annexed property within the City of
Kenn~wick by the total population of said area to develop a per capita rate, then multiplied by the
then-current population of the City. Population will be as determined by the most recent official
population as published by the Washington State Office of Financial Management.
This transition will occur as follows:
(1) The 2022 annual fee shall be adjusted effective July 1, 2022, through December 31,
2022, based on the formulae described above, as follows: The City agrees to pay the
District monthly payments in the amount of $170,998 for this period, representing the
implementation of an increase equal to 33% of the PCCF fee calculation differential.
Exhibit A illustrates how the fee shall be calculated for the remainder of 2022, and
provides an example of the basis by which the fee shall be calculated thereafter.
(2) Commencing January 1, 2023, the City agrees to pay the District an annual fee based
on an increase to 66% of the PCCF fee calculation differential as adjusted for 2023.
(3) Commencing January 1, 2024, the City agrees to pay the District an annual fee based
on 100% of the PCCF for 2024, and thereafter, the City shall compensate the District
the per capita-based Contract Fee for each subsequent year during the entire term of
this Agreement.
With the exception of payments made in 2022 (which shall be paid in accordance with
section (1) above), the City shall pay each year's fee to the District in 12 equal monthly
installments. Each installment shall be paid by the last day of the month in which it becomes due.
Page 136 of 276
In the event that the monthly installment payment is not paid by the last day of the month
in which it is due, then in addition thereto, as a late charge, the City agrees to pay 1 % per month
of the delinquent installment for each month delinquent until paid.
XI. Term of Agreement: Unless earlier terminated, this Agreement shall end
December 31, 2032. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may terminate this Agreement to
take effect not less than eighteen (18) months from the date of written notification or immediately
upon annexation of the City into the District. Upon termination, except in case of annexation, all
alterations, improvements, additions, or fixtures made by District to the main branch, other than
District's property, shall become the property of the City and be surrendered with the premises .
XII. Renegotiation: At any time during the last five years of the contract, either party
may request renegotiation of one or more terms of the contract by providing advance written
request to the other party . Such notice shall cite the basis for the request in sufficient detail to
provide the other party a reasonable understanding of the scope of the requested negotiation. The
only obligation created by such notice shall be the obligation to meet and discuss, in good faith,
the basis for the request; however, neither party shall be under any obligation to amend this
Agreement.
XIII. Interlocal Cooperation Act Provisions: No special budget or funds are
anticipated, nor shall be created. It is not intended that a separate legal entity be established to
conduct this cooperative undertaking, nor is the acquiring, holding, or disposing of real or personal
property contemplated, other than as specifically provided within the terms of this Agreement. The
City Manager of the City and the Executive Director of the District shall be designated as the
Administrators of this Inter local Agreement.
This Agreement shall be filed with the Franklin County Auditor, or alternatively listed by
subject on either Party's website or other electronically retrievable public source.
XIV. Annexation: During the term of the Agreement, upon the written request of either
party, the parties agree to meet and evaluate, in good faith, the potential annexation of the City
into the District, In the event the city determines to initiate a ballot measure for annexation into
the District, the District agrees to provide timely public information upon request by the City.
XV. Miscellaneous:
A. Waiver. The parties agree that time is of the essence of each and every provision
contained herein and no waiver of any breach of any condition or covenant shall waive any other
condition or covenant or any future breach.
B . Ille gality. The parties agree that if any provision of the Agreement is declared
illegal or violative of the law, the remaining provisions thereof shall remain in full force and affect.
Page 137 of 276
C. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and
supersedes and replaces any and all prior or contemporaneous agreements or understandings,
written or oral, express or implied, between the parties concerning the subject matter of this
Agreement.
D. Modification. This Agreement shall not be subject to modification except by
written agreement signed by the parties.
E. Coo peration. The parties agree to fully cooperate in all matters related to or arising
out of this Agreement.
F. Scrutiny . This Agreement has been submitted to the scrutiny of the parties and their
respective legal counsel and shall be given a fair and reasonable interpretation in accordance with
the words hereof without consideration or weight being given to its being drafted by or for one of
the parties.
XVI. Dispute Resolution: Should any dispute arise concerning the interpretation,
enforcement, breach or default of this Agreement, the parties shall first meet in good faith and
attempt to resolve or mediate the dispute . In the event it remains unresolved by mediation, the
dispute shall be resolved by final and binding arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, the Mandatory
Rules of Arbitration, but with no right of appeal. The arbitration shall be conducted by a single
arbitrator selected by mutual agreement of the parties or, failing such agreement, the arbitrator
shall be selected by the then presiding judge of the Franklin County Superior Court. Venue for
such arbitration shall be placed in Franklin County, Washington , and the prevailing party shall be
awarded its attorney fees and costs as additional judgment against the other.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the said District and the said City have caused this contract
and agreement to be executed by their respective officers on the day and year first written above .
MID-COLUMBIA LIBRARIES CITY OF PASCO
By :~
Attested to by: Attested to by:
~£J----
Debby Barham, CMC , City Clerk
Page 138 of 276
I
I
I
I
Exhibit A
Calculations for City Cost of Service July 2022-December 2023
Monthly Payment
Annual Divisor: 12 Divisor: 6 Total
2022 Contracted Rate (January -June) $ 1,557,224.76 s 119,768.73 $ -$ 129,768.73
100% of PCCF -2022 $ 2,306,853 .54 $ 192,237.79 $ -
Difference $ 749,628.78 $ 62 ,469.06 $ -
33% ofDifference $ 247,377.50 $ 20,614.79 s 41,129.58
2022 Contracted Rate (July-December) s 1,804,602.26 $ 129,768.73 $ 41,229.58 s 170.998.31
2023 Contracted Rate (January-June) $ 1,557,224.76 s 129,761.73 $ -$ 129,768.73
/00 % of PCCF-2023 (Es timate) $ 2,358,483.69 $ 196,540.31 $ -
Difference (Estimate) $ 801,258.93 $ 66,771.58 $ -
66 % of Difference (Estimate) $ 528,830.90 s 44,069.24 $ -
2023 Contracted Rate (Estimate) s 2,086,055.66 $ 173,837.97 $ -s 173,837.97
2022 Note: Pasco is currently paying $129,768.73 per month per the expiring IIA. In current proposal language, MCL is asking for 33% of
the difference between the current fee and the calculated 2022 per capita fee. As the successor agreement is intended to go into effect July
I, 33% of the difference ($247,377.50) would be applied towards the remaining six months of payments, or $4 1,229.58 per month, in addition
to the $129,768.73. 6 months @$129,768.73 + 6 months@ 170,998.31 =$1,804,602.26.
2023 (Estimate) Note: The 2023 contracted rate estimate is provided for planning purposes; we can anticipate a small variance based on
TBD actuals. Estimate is based on previous years' assessed valuation growth and corresponding district levy change. Population for 2023
PCCF calculation for both Kennewick and Pasco is already known .
Page 139 of 276
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 8, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 8/18/25
FROM: Haylie Miller, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: *Q Ordinance No. 4783 - Webster Court Rezone from R-S-20 to R-1 (5
minute staff presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Ordinance
Exhibit A – Hearing Examiner Recommendation, dated July 18, 2025
Exhibit B – Vicinity Map
Public Comments Received
Staff report and information packet to hearing examiner for hearing on July 09,
2025
City Council PowerPoint Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4783, amending the Zoning Classification of
certain real property located near the corner of W Argent Road and Road 84,
and, further, authorize publication by summary only.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
On July 09, 2025, the Hearing Examiner held a public hearing to consider a
request to rezone parcel #118402034 (Short Plat 2018-30, Lot 1) in Pasco,
Franklin County, Washington from R-S-20 Suburban to R-1 Low-Density
Residential.
Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner
recommended approval of the Applicant’s request for a rezone.
No appeals of this recommendation have been received.
Page 140 of 276
V. DISCUSSION:
Applicant Shane O’Neill of Clover Planning & Zoning, on behalf of Webster
Court LLC, requested to rezone Parcel No. 118402034, located east of Road
84, north of West Livingston Road, south of West Argent Road, and west of
Road 80 from R-S-20 Suburban to R-1 Low-Density Residential. The subject
area being rezoned is approximately 1.00 acre in size.
The subject property is designated as Low-Density Residential under the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. As outlined in Pasco Municipal Code
(PMC) 25.210.030, the criteria for a zone change are detailed on page 2 of the
Hearing Examiner’s decision (Exhibit A).
Recommendation – Hearing Examiner:
As noted in the attached “Exhibit A,” the Hearing Examiner has found that the
proposed rezone meets the criteria found in PMC Section 25.210.060, and
recommended, based on the Recommended Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law, that the City Council approve the rezone of Parcel No. 118402034 from
R-S-20 to R-1, without a concomitant agreement.
Page 141 of 276
Ordinance Rezone Z2025-005 - 1
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF:
City of Pasco, Washington
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Pasco, Washington
Attn: City Clerk
525 North 3rd Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE CORNER OF W ARGENT ROAD AND
ROAD 84.
WHEREAS, the petitioner, Shane O’Neill on behalf of Webster Court LLC, seeks to
rezone Parcel No. 118402034, located at 2817 Road 84, Pasco, Washington; and
WHEREAS, a complete and adequate petition for change of zoning classification meeting
the requirements of Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Section 25.210.030 was received by the City of
Pasco (City) and, after notice was issued under PMC Section 25.210.040, an open record hearing
was conducted by the Pasco Hearing Examiner upon such petition on July 9, 2025; and
WHEREAS, based upon substantial evidence and demonstration of the Petitioner that: (a)
the proposal is in accord with the goals and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan; (b) the
effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity is not materially detrimental; (c) there is merit and
value in the proposal for the community as a whole; (d) any impacts of the rezone application and
anticipated development will be mitigated by t he regulations and requirements of the Pasco
Municipal Code and the City of Pasco Design and Constructions Standards; (e) a co ncomitant
agreement is not required under these circumstances; and (f) the proposal is consistent with and
satisfies all criteria in PMC Section 25.210.060; the Hearing Examiner has recommended to
approve the rezone, which findings and recommendation are hereby adopted by the City Council,
and the Hearing Examiner Report is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit A.
Page 142 of 276
Ordinance Rezone Z2025-005 - 2
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Pasco, Washington, and the
Zoning Map, accompanying and being part of said Ordinance shall be and hereby is changed from
R-S-20 Residential Suburban to R-1 Low-Density Residential for the real property as shown in
Exhibit B attached hereto and described as follows:
SHORT PLAT 2018-30, LOT 1
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word
of this Ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this
Ordinance.
Section 3. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this Ordinance, including scrivener’s errors
or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or
numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days
after approval, passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of August,
2025.
_____________________________
David Milne
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Published: _____________________________
Page 143 of 276
CITY OF PASCO
LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
IN THE MATTER OF )RECOMMENDED FINDINGS OF
)FACT,RECOMMENDED
Z 2025-005 )CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,AND
O’Neill Rezone )RECOMMENDED DECISION
THIS MATTER having come on for hearing in front of the City of Pasco Hearing Examiner on July 9,
2025,the Hearing Examiner having taken evidence hereby submits the following Recommended Findings
of F act,Recommended Conclusions of Law,and Recommended Decision as follows:
1.FINDINGS OF FACT
1.APPLICANT:Shane O’Neill;6904 Rogue Dr.;Pasco,WA 99301
2.REQUEST:Rezone:2817 Road 84 (Parcel #118402034)Rezone from RS—20(Residential
Suburban)to R—l(Low—DensityResidential)
3.Timeline:
3.1.23 May 2025 Application Submitted
3.2.10 June 2025 Application Deemed Complete
3.3.20 June 2025 Application Noticed for Public Hearing
3.4.2 July 2025 Public Hearing Staff Report Published
4.PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
4.1.Legal:SHORT PLAT 2018-30 LOT 1
4.2.General Location:Located of Road 84 approximately 452 ft.north of W Livingston Rd.
4.3.Properly Size:Approximately 1 acre
5.ACCESS:The parcel has access off Road 84.
6.’UTILITIES:Municipal water is available off Road 84,municipal sewer is located approximately 690
feet to the north at the intersection of Road 84 and W Argent Rd.
7.LAND USE AND ZONING:The site is zoned RS—20(Residential Suburban)and is developed with
a single—familydwelling unit and various accessory structures.Surrounding properties are zoned and
developed as follows:
7.1.NortthS-ZO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/SINGLE FAMILY DWELLIN GS
7.2.East:RS—20 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS
7.3.South:RS-20 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS
7.4.West:RS-20 Low Density Residential/SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS
8.Comprehensive Plan:The City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan designates this site as “Low Density
Residential.”The Low—DensityResidential designation is described as a variety of residential housing
Z 2025—005
O’Neill Rezone
Page 1 of 8
Page 144 of 276
8.
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
:
Th
e
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
s
th
i
s
si
t
e
as
“L
o
w
De
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
.
”
Th
e
Lo
w
-
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
is
de
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
as
a
va
r
i
e
t
y
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
at
a
de
n
s
i
t
y
of
3
to
6
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
pe
r
ac
r
e
,
an
d
ma
y
be
as
s
i
g
n
e
d
RS
-
2
0
,
RS
-
1
2
,
RS
-
l
,
R-
l
,
R—
l
-
A
,
an
d
R—
l
-
A
2
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Pe
r
Pa
s
c
o
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Co
d
e
(P
M
C
)
25
.
2
1
5
.
0
1
5
,
ma
x
i
m
u
m
gr
o
s
s
de
n
s
i
t
y
of
an
y
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
wi
t
h
i
n
an
y
zo
n
i
n
g
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
,
ex
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
as
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
pe
r
ac
r
e
,
sh
a
l
l
be
no
le
s
s
th
a
n
th
e
co
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
i
n
g
mi
n
i
m
u
m
de
n
s
i
t
y
ex
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
in
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
la
n
d
us
e
de
n
s
i
t
y
ta
b
l
e
,
an
d
no
gr
e
a
t
e
r
th
a
n
th
e
co
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
i
n
g
ma
x
i
m
u
m
de
n
s
i
t
y
ex
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
in
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
la
n
d
us
e
de
n
s
i
t
y
ta
b
l
e
,
ex
c
e
p
t
as
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
in
Ch
a
p
t
e
r
25
.
1
6
1
PM
C
.
8.
1
.
Th
i
s
re
z
o
n
e
re
q
u
e
s
t
su
p
p
o
r
t
s
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
Go
a
l
H—
l
of
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
,
wh
i
c
h
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
ho
u
s
i
n
g
fo
r
al
l
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
se
g
m
e
n
t
s
of
th
e
ci
t
y
’
s
po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
th
e
lo
c
a
l
an
d
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
ma
r
k
e
t
.
Th
e
re
z
o
n
e
re
q
u
e
s
t
is
al
s
o
in
li
n
e
wi
t
h
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
Po
l
i
c
y
H—
l
-
A
wh
i
c
h
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
th
e
Ci
t
y
to
al
l
o
w
fo
r
a
hi
l
l
ra
n
g
e
of
ho
u
s
i
n
g
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
si
n
g
l
e
fa
m
i
l
y
ho
m
e
s
,
to
w
n
h
o
u
s
e
s
,
co
n
d
o
m
i
n
i
u
m
s
,
ap
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
,
an
d
ma
n
u
f
a
c
t
u
r
e
d
ho
u
s
i
n
g
,
ac
c
e
s
s
o
r
y
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
,
ze
r
o
lo
t
li
n
e
,
pl
a
n
n
e
d
un
i
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
et
c
.
9.
EN
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
DE
T
E
R
M
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
:
Th
e
zo
n
e
ch
a
n
g
e
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
is
ex
e
m
p
t
fr
o
m
SE
P
A
du
e
to
th
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
me
e
t
i
n
g
th
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
of
WA
C
19
7
—
1
1
-
8
0
0
(
c
)
.
10
.
AN
A
L
Y
S
I
S
11
.
Re
q
u
e
s
t
11
.
1
.
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
Sh
a
n
e
O’
N
e
i
l
l
wi
s
h
e
s
to
re
z
o
n
e
(P
a
r
c
e
l
#1
1
8
4
0
2
0
3
4
)
in
Pa
s
c
o
,
WA
99
3
0
1
fr
o
m
RS
-
2
0
(R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Su
b
u
r
b
a
n
)
to
R-
1
(L
o
w
-
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
)
.
Th
e
si
t
e
s
co
m
p
r
i
s
e
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
ac
r
e
.
Th
e
un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
La
n
d
Us
e
Co
d
e
is
“L
o
w
De
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
”
wh
i
c
h
sp
e
c
i
?
e
s
3
to
6
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
(D
U
)
pe
r
ac
r
e
.
11
.
2
.
Th
e
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
re
z
o
n
e
do
e
s
no
t
in
c
l
u
d
e
a
pr
o
j
e
c
t
ac
t
i
o
n
.
It
is
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
th
a
t
sh
o
u
l
d
th
e
re
z
o
n
e
be
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
a
su
b
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
pr
o
j
e
c
t
wo
u
l
d
li
k
e
l
y
be
su
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
fo
r
re
v
i
e
w
.
Th
i
s
re
v
i
e
w
wo
u
l
d
in
c
l
u
d
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
fo
r
th
e
im
p
a
c
t
s
it
ha
s
on
th
e
le
v
e
l
of
se
r
v
i
c
e
fo
r
pa
r
k
s
,
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
et
c
.
An
y
su
b
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
wo
u
l
d
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
be
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
to
ad
h
e
r
e
to
Pa
s
c
o
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Co
d
e
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
pr
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
su
c
h
as
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
an
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
s
i
g
n
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
If
an
y
fu
t
u
r
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
is
in
ex
c
e
s
s
of
th
e
ca
t
e
g
o
r
i
c
a
l
th
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
in
WA
C
19
7
—
11
-
8
0
0
th
o
u
g
h
,
th
e
n
a
SE
P
A
wi
l
l
li
k
e
l
y
be
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
to
id
e
n
t
i
f
y
an
d
mi
t
i
g
a
t
e
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
im
p
a
c
t
s
to
th
e
na
t
u
r
a
l
an
d
bu
i
l
t
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
s
.
12
.
Hi
s
t
o
r
y
12
.
1
.
Th
e
si
t
e
wa
s
an
n
e
x
e
d
in
t
o
th
e
Ci
t
y
in
20
1
5
Vi
a
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
42
2
2
an
d
su
b
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
l
y
as
s
i
g
n
e
d
th
e
RS
—
2
0
(R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Su
b
u
r
b
a
n
)
zo
n
i
n
g
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
vi
a
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
42
2
1
.
Th
e
si
t
e
co
n
t
a
i
n
s
an
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
an
d
a
co
u
p
l
e
of
ac
c
e
s
s
o
r
y
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
th
a
t
we
r
e
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
ar
o
u
n
d
19
6
7
.
13
.
Re
z
o
n
e
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
13
.
1
.
Th
e
in
i
t
i
a
l
re
v
i
e
w
cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
fo
r
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
a
re
z
o
n
e
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
ar
e
ex
p
l
a
i
n
e
d
in
PM
C
.
25
.
2
1
0
.
0
3
0
.
Th
e
cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
ar
e
li
s
t
e
d
be
l
o
w
as
fo
l
l
o
w
s
:
13
.
1
.
1
.
1
.
Th
e
si
t
e
wa
s
as
s
i
g
n
e
d
RS
-
2
O
zo
n
i
n
g
in
20
1
5
vi
a
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
42
2
2
13
.
1
.
2
.
Th
e
ch
a
n
g
e
d
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
,
wh
i
c
h
ar
e
al
l
e
g
e
d
to
wa
r
r
a
n
t
ot
h
e
r
or
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
zo
n
i
n
g
:
13
.
1
.
2
.
1
.
In
20
1
5
th
e
si
t
e
wa
s
an
n
e
x
e
d
in
t
o
th
e
Ci
t
y
an
d
gi
v
e
n
th
e
Lo
w
—
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
,
an
d
ha
s
re
m
a
i
n
e
d
so
si
n
c
e
.
Si
n
c
e
20
1
5
,
th
e
Ci
t
y
of
P
a
s
c
o
is
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
ha
s
be
e
n
up
d
a
t
e
d
to
re
?
e
c
t
a
3
to
6
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
(D
U
)
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
fo
r
th
e
Lo
w
Z
20
2
5
-
0
0
5
O’
N
e
i
l
l
Re
z
o
n
e
Pa
g
e
2
of
8
Page 145 of 276
De
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
La
n
d
Us
e
Co
d
e
.
It
is
no
t
po
s
s
i
b
l
e
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
to
th
e
mi
n
i
m
u
m
de
n
s
i
t
y
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
wi
t
h
o
u
t
re
z
o
n
i
n
g
to
an
o
t
h
e
r
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
al
l
o
w
e
d
in
th
e
un
d
e
r
Lo
w
De
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
La
n
d
Us
e
.
A
re
z
o
n
e
?o
m
RS
—
2
0
(R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Su
b
u
r
b
a
n
)
to
R—
1
(L
o
w
-
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
)
wi
l
l
al
l
o
w
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
to
be
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
to
de
n
s
i
t
y
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
of
Pa
s
c
o
is
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
.
13
.
1
.
2
.
2
.
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
,
th
e
zo
n
e
ch
a
n
g
e
of
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
to
R-
I
,
wi
l
l
al
l
o
w
fo
r
th
e
ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
wi
t
h
mo
r
e
ty
p
e
s
of
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
to
se
r
v
e
th
e
po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
On
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
24
,
20
2
2
,
Co
u
n
c
i
l
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
45
7
5
,
am
e
n
d
i
n
g
th
e
Zo
n
i
n
g
co
d
e
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
Pa
s
c
o
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Co
d
e
(P
M
C
)
25
.
4
5
re
l
a
t
i
n
g
to
th
e
R~
1
zo
n
i
n
g
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
Th
e
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
ch
a
n
g
e
d
th
e
pu
r
p
o
s
e
of
th
e
R-
I
zo
n
e
fo
u
n
d
in
PM
C
25
.
45
.
01
0
,
as
fo
l
l
o
w
s
:
“T
he
R-
I
lo
w
de
n
s
i
t
y
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
is
es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
to
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
lo
w
-
to
me
d
i
u
m
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
co
m
p
l
i
a
n
t
wi
t
h
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
la
n
d
us
e
de
n
s
i
t
y
ta
b
l
e
in
PM
C
25
.
2
1
5
.
01
5
.
Ce
r
t
a
i
n
pu
b
l
i
c
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
in
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
s
ma
y
al
s
o
be
pe
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
,
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
th
e
i
r
na
t
u
r
e
an
d
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
ar
e
no
t
de
t
r
i
m
e
n
t
a
l
to
th
e
in
t
e
n
d
e
d
lo
w
—
to
me
d
i
u
m
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
.
”
As
we
l
l
,
PM
C
25
.
4
5
.
02
0
ad
d
e
d
ze
r
o
-
lo
t
li
n
e
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
,
mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
,
du
p
l
e
x
e
s
,
tr
i
p
l
e
x
e
s
,
an
d
co
u
r
t
y
a
r
d
ap
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
to
th
e
mi
x
of
al
l
o
w
e
d
us
e
s
in
th
e
R-
I
zo
n
i
n
g
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
Th
e
de
n
s
i
t
y
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
in
PM
C
25
.
45
.
05
0
wa
s
al
s
o
am
e
n
d
e
d
to
el
i
m
i
n
a
t
e
th
e
on
e
-
u
n
i
t
—
p
e
r
—
l
o
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
re
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
.
13
.
1
.
3
.
Fa
c
t
s
to
ju
s
t
i
f
y
th
e
ch
a
n
g
e
on
th
e
ba
s
i
s
of
ad
v
a
n
c
i
n
g
th
e
pu
b
l
i
c
he
a
l
t
h
,
sa
f
e
t
y
an
d
ge
n
e
r
a
l
we
l
f
a
r
e
:
13
.
1
.3
.
1
.
Th
e
re
z
o
n
e
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
ar
e
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
th
e
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
-
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
,
wh
i
c
h
ha
s
be
e
n
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
to
be
in
th
e
be
s
t
in
t
e
r
e
s
t
of
ad
v
a
n
c
i
n
g
pu
b
l
i
c
he
a
l
t
h
,
sa
f
e
t
y
,
an
d
ge
n
e
r
a
l
we
l
f
a
r
e
of
th
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
It
is
ho
p
e
d
th
a
t
fu
r
t
h
e
r
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
su
b
d
i
v
i
d
e
an
d
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
of
ho
u
s
i
n
g
ty
p
e
s
on
th
e
si
t
e
wi
l
l
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
th
e
de
s
i
r
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
of
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
as
we
l
l
as
th
e
pu
b
l
i
c
he
a
l
t
h
,
sa
f
e
t
y
,
an
d
ge
n
e
r
a
l
we
l
f
a
r
e
.
13
.
1
.
3
.
2
.
Fr
o
m
a
pu
b
l
i
c
he
a
l
t
h
pe
r
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
,
fu
t
u
r
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
of
th
e
si
t
e
co
u
l
d
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
wa
l
k
i
n
g
to
an
d
fr
o
m
sc
h
o
o
l
wi
t
h
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
of
pr
o
p
e
r
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
Li
v
i
n
g
s
t
o
n
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
is
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
.1
2
mi
l
e
s
fr
o
m
th
e
si
t
e
,
al
o
n
g
wi
t
h
Ch
i
a
w
a
n
a
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
lo
c
a
t
e
d
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
.1
4
mi
l
e
s
an
d
Mc
L
o
u
g
h
l
i
n
Mi
d
d
l
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
lo
c
a
t
e
d
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
.0
7
mi
l
e
s
fr
o
m
th
e
si
t
e
.
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
,
th
e
si
t
e
is
lo
c
a
t
e
d
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
.5
8
mi
l
e
s
fr
o
m
th
e
fr
o
n
t
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
of
C
hi
a
w
a
n
a
Pa
r
k
,
wh
i
c
h
bo
r
d
e
r
s
th
e
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
Ri
v
e
r
.
13
.
1
.
3
.
3
.
In
te
r
m
s
of
pu
b
l
i
c
sa
f
e
t
y
,
th
e
si
t
e
is
lo
c
a
t
e
d
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
.4
3
mi
l
e
s
fr
o
m
Fr
a
n
k
l
i
n
Co
u
n
t
y
Fi
r
e
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
3
St
a
t
i
o
n
34
al
o
n
g
We
s
t
Co
u
r
t
St
r
e
e
t
,
we
l
l
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
re
s
p
o
n
s
e
—
t
i
m
e
zo
n
e
.
Th
e
r
e
is
al
s
o
Pa
s
c
o
Fi
r
e
St
a
t
i
o
n
85
lo
c
a
t
e
d
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1.
0
9
mi
l
e
s
aw
a
y
al
o
n
g
Ro
a
d
10
0
.
13
.
1
.
3
.
4
.
Sa
f
e
t
y
of
th
e
fu
t
u
r
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
wi
l
l
al
s
o
be
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
fo
r
th
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
ci
v
i
l
,
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
an
d
?r
e
co
d
e
s
wh
i
c
h
ma
n
d
a
t
e
ad
e
q
u
a
t
e
ac
c
e
s
s
,
?r
e
hy
d
r
a
n
t
s
,
an
d
si
m
i
l
a
r
?r
e
an
d
li
f
e
sa
f
e
t
y
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
fo
r
al
l
ne
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
13
.
1
.
4
.
1
.
A
ch
a
n
g
e
in
zo
n
i
n
g
wo
u
l
d
be
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
Fu
t
u
r
e
La
n
d
Us
e
Ma
p
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
fo
r
th
e
si
t
e
wh
i
c
h
is
Lo
w
De
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
.
Th
e
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
la
n
d
us
a
g
e
ma
t
c
h
e
s
th
a
t
of
th
e
aa
j
a
c
e
n
t
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
an
d
wo
u
l
d
ha
v
e
a
po
s
i
t
i
v
e
im
p
a
c
t
on
ne
i
gh
b
or
i
n
g
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
Z
20
2
5
—
0
0
5
O’
N
e
i
l
l
Re
z
o
n
e
Pa
g
e
3
of
8
Page 146 of 276
13
.
1
.
4
.
2
.
Th
e
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
re
z
o
n
e
wo
u
l
d
al
l
o
w
fo
r
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
be
t
w
e
e
n
3
to
6
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
pe
r
ac
r
e
,
a
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
ap
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
to
bo
t
h
th
e
RS
-
2
0
an
d
th
e
R-
I
zo
n
i
n
g
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
bu
t
is
un
o
b
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
du
e
to
RS
—
Z
O
mi
n
i
m
u
m
lo
t
si
z
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
[P
M
C
25
.
3
0
.
05
0
(
1
)
]
.
An
y
su
b
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ac
t
i
o
n
s
,
de
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
up
o
n
th
e
i
r
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
,
co
u
l
d
be
su
b
j
e
c
t
to
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
s
St
a
t
e
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Po
l
i
c
y
Ac
t
(S
E
P
A
)
re
v
i
e
w
.
Th
i
s
re
v
i
e
w
in
c
l
u
d
e
s
id
e
n
t
i
?
i
n
g
an
d
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
n
g
an
y
im
p
a
c
t
s
to
th
e
na
t
u
r
a
l
an
d
bu
i
l
t
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
.
13
.
1
.
5
.
Th
e
ef
f
e
c
t
on
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
ow
n
e
r
or
ow
n
e
r
s
if
th
e
re
q
u
e
s
t
is
no
t
gr
a
n
t
e
d
:
13
.
1
.
5
.
1
.
Ac
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
to
th
e
ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
,
if
th
e
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
zo
n
e
ch
a
n
g
e
is
no
t
gr
a
n
t
e
d
to
wo
u
l
d
le
a
d
to
lo
w
e
r
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
an
d
re
d
u
c
e
d
la
n
d
va
l
u
e
du
e
to
th
e
cu
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
al
l
o
w
i
n
g
fo
r
le
s
s
de
n
s
i
t
y
.
Ov
e
r
ti
m
e
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
“.
.
.
c
0
u
l
d
be
c
o
m
e
an
is
o
l
a
t
e
d
po
c
k
e
t
of
un
d
e
r
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
d
la
n
d
,
po
s
s
i
b
l
y
ma
k
i
n
g
in
?
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
ex
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
le
s
s
co
s
t
—
e
?
e
c
t
i
v
e
or
de
l
a
y
e
d
(A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Na
r
r
a
t
i
v
e
,
Pg
.
5)
.
”
It
wo
u
l
d
al
s
o
ad
d
ba
r
r
i
e
r
s
to
me
e
t
i
n
g
ho
u
s
i
n
g
de
m
a
n
d
at
a
ti
m
e
wh
e
r
e
Pa
s
c
o
s
de
m
a
n
d
fo
r
ho
u
s
i
n
g
is
in
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
.
Al
s
o
,
ke
e
p
i
n
g
th
e
zo
n
i
n
g
as
RS
—
2
0
wo
u
l
d
be
co
n
t
r
a
r
y
to
th
e
Ci
t
y
is
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
du
e
to
th
e
cu
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
ha
v
i
n
g
a
de
n
s
i
t
y
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
le
s
s
th
a
n
th
e
mi
n
i
m
u
m
al
l
o
w
e
d
fo
r
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
s
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
La
n
d
Us
e
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
.
13
.
1
.
6
.
Th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
la
n
d
us
e
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
fo
r
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
:
13
.
1
.
6
.
1
.
Th
e
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
s
th
i
s
si
t
e
as
“L
o
w
De
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
.
”
Th
e
Lo
w
De
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
va
r
i
e
t
y
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
at
a
de
n
s
i
t
y
of
3
to
6
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
pe
r
ac
r
e
,
an
d
ma
y
be
as
s
i
g
n
e
d
RS
-
2
0
,
RS
-
12
,
RS
~
1
,
R-
1
,
R—
I
-
A
,
an
d
R—
I
—
A
Z
zo
n
i
n
g
.
13
.
1
.
7
.
Su
c
h
ot
h
e
r
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
as
th
e
He
a
r
i
n
g
Ex
a
m
i
n
e
r
re
q
u
i
r
e
s
:
13
.
1
.
7
.
1
.
Th
e
re
z
o
n
e
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
is
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
an
d
me
e
t
s
th
e
in
t
e
n
t
of
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
,
an
d
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
Go
a
l
s
.
14
.
FI
N
D
I
N
G
S
OF
FA
C
T
14
.
1
.
Pu
b
l
i
c
no
t
i
c
e
of
th
i
s
he
a
r
i
n
g
wa
s
se
n
t
to
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
ow
n
e
r
s
wi
t
h
i
n
30
0
fe
e
t
of
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
an
d
po
s
t
e
d
in
th
e
Tr
i
-
C
i
t
y
He
r
a
l
d
on
Ju
n
e
20
,
20
2
5
.
14
.
2
.
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
wi
s
h
e
s
to
re
z
o
n
e
Pa
r
c
e
l
11
8
4
0
2
0
3
4
fr
o
m
RS
-
2
0
(R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Su
b
u
r
b
a
n
)
to
R—
l
(L
o
w
—
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
)
.
14
.
3
.
Th
e
si
t
e
s
co
m
p
r
i
s
e
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
ac
r
e
.
14
.
4
.
Th
e
un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
Lo
w
-
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
La
n
d
Us
e
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
sp
e
c
i
?
e
s
3
to
6
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
(D
U
)
pe
r
ac
r
e
.
14
.
5
.
Th
e
si
t
e
wa
s
as
s
i
g
n
e
d
R—
S
—
2
0
zo
n
i
n
g
in
20
1
5
Vi
a
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
42
2
2
.
14
.
6
.
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
R-
S
—
2
0
zo
n
e
on
l
y
ha
s
a
de
n
s
i
t
y
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
of
2
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
pe
r
ac
r
e
,
wh
i
c
h
is
be
l
o
w
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
La
n
d
Us
e
mi
n
i
m
u
m
of
3
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
pe
r
ac
r
e
ma
k
i
n
g
th
e
zo
n
e
le
g
a
l
l
y
no
n
-
co
n
f
o
r
m
i
n
g
.
co
n
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
th
e
Lo
w
-
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
La
n
d
Us
e
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
.
14
.
8
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
is
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
.1
2
mi
l
e
s
fr
o
m
Li
v
i
n
g
s
t
o
n
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
,
.1
4
mi
l
e
s
fr
o
m
Ch
i
a
w
a
n
a
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
an
d
.0
7
mi
l
e
s
fr
o
m
Mc
L
o
u
g
h
l
i
n
Mi
d
d
l
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
.
14
.
9
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
is
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
.4
3
mi
l
e
s
fr
o
m
Fr
a
n
k
l
i
n
Co
u
n
t
y
Fi
r
e
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
3
St
a
t
i
o
n
34
an
d
1.
0
9
mi
l
e
s
fr
o
m
Pa
s
c
o
Fi
r
e
St
a
t
i
o
n
85
.
Z
20
2
5
—
0
0
5
O’
N
e
i
l
l
Re
z
o
n
e
Pa
g
e
4
of
8
Page 147 of 276
15
.
16
.
14
.
1
0
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
is
ne
a
r
tw
o
ma
j
o
r
ro
a
d
co
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
s
(R
o
a
d
84
&
W
Ar
g
e
n
t
Rd
.
)
.
14
.
1
1
.
Th
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
20
1
8
-
2
0
3
8
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
La
n
d
Us
e
Ma
p
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
s
th
e
si
t
e
as
“L
o
w
De
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
”
.
14
.
1
2
.
Th
e
“L
o
w
De
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
”
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
ma
y
be
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
wi
t
h
a
va
r
i
e
t
y
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
si
n
g
l
e
fa
m
i
l
y
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
,
ze
r
o
lo
t
li
n
e
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
,
mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
,
du
p
l
e
x
e
s
,
tr
i
p
l
e
x
e
s
,
an
d
co
u
r
t
y
a
r
d
ap
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
.
14
.
1
3
.
Pa
r
c
e
l
11
8
4
0
2
0
3
4
co
n
t
a
i
n
s
a
si
n
g
l
e
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
an
d
ac
c
e
s
s
o
r
y
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
bu
i
l
t
ar
o
u
n
d
19
6
7
.
CO
N
C
L
U
S
I
O
N
S
BA
S
E
D
ON
FI
N
D
I
N
G
S
OF
FA
C
T
Be
f
o
r
e
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
or
de
n
i
a
l
of
a
re
z
o
n
e
,
th
e
He
a
r
i
n
g
Ex
a
m
i
n
e
r
mu
s
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
?n
d
i
n
g
s
of
fa
c
t
fr
o
m
wh
i
c
h
to
dr
a
w
it
s
co
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
ba
s
e
d
up
o
n
th
e
cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
li
s
t
e
d
in
PM
C
25
21
0
.
0
6
0
.
Th
e
cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
ar
e
as
fo
l
l
o
w
s
:
16
.
1.
Th
e
pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
is
in
ac
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
th
e
go
a
l
s
an
d
po
l
i
c
i
e
s
of
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
.
16
.
1
.
1
.
Th
e
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
s
th
i
s
si
t
e
as
“L
o
w
De
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
.
”
Th
e
Lo
w
De
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
va
r
i
e
t
y
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
at
a
de
n
s
i
t
y
of
3
to
6
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
pe
r
ac
r
e
,
an
d
ma
y
be
as
s
i
g
n
e
d
RS
—
2
0
,
RS
—
1
2
,
RS
—
J
,
R-
I
,
R-
I
-
A
,
an
d
R—
J
-
A
2
zo
n
i
n
g
.
16
.
1
.
2
.
Pe
r
PM
C
25
.
2
1
5
.
01
5
ma
x
i
m
u
m
gr
o
s
s
de
n
s
i
t
y
of
an
y
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
wi
t
h
i
n
an
y
zo
n
i
n
g
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
,
ex
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
as
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
pe
r
ac
r
e
,
sh
a
l
l
be
no
le
s
s
th
a
n
th
e
co
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
i
n
g
mi
n
i
m
u
m
de
n
s
i
t
y
ex
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
in
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
la
n
d
us
e
de
n
s
i
t
y
ta
b
l
e
,
an
d
no
gr
e
a
t
e
r
th
a
n
th
e
co
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
i
n
g
ma
x
i
m
u
m
de
n
s
i
t
y
ex
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
in
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
la
n
d
us
e
de
n
s
i
t
y
ta
b
l
e
,
ex
c
e
p
t
as
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
in
Ch
a
p
t
e
r
25
.
1
6
]
PM
C
.
16
.
1
.3
.
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
of
R-
S
—
Z
O
ha
s
a
de
n
s
i
t
y
al
l
o
w
a
n
c
e
of
on
l
y
2
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
pe
r
ac
r
e
,
wh
i
c
h
is
be
l
o
w
th
e
mi
n
i
m
u
m
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
n
s
i
t
y
as
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
fo
r
th
e
Lo
w
-
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
La
n
d
Us
e
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
.
He
n
c
e
at
pr
e
s
e
n
t
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
ca
n
n
o
t
be
fu
r
t
h
e
r
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
du
e
to
th
e
de
n
s
i
t
y
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
be
i
n
g
be
l
o
w
th
e
mi
n
i
m
u
m
al
l
o
w
e
d
in
PM
C
25
.
2
1
5
.
01
5
.
Ch
a
n
g
i
n
g
th
e
zo
n
i
n
g
wi
l
l
al
l
o
w
fo
r
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
to
be
ab
l
e
to
be
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
at
a
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
as
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
un
d
e
r
PM
C
25
.
2
1
5
.
01
5
.
16
.
1
.
4
.
The
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
re
z
o
n
e
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
wo
u
l
d
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
or
be
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
th
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
co
m
p
pl
a
n
go
a
l
s
/
p
o
l
i
c
e
s
:
16
.
1
.
5
.
La
n
d
Us
e
Go
a
l
2:
Pl
a
n
fo
r
a
va
r
i
e
t
y
of
co
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
la
n
d
us
e
s
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
UG
A
.
16
.
1
.
5
.
1
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2-
B
:
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
pl
a
n
n
e
d
gr
o
w
t
h
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
Ci
t
y
li
m
i
t
s
an
d
UG
A
,
an
d
pr
o
m
o
t
e
in
?
l
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
in
th
e
Ci
t
y
li
m
i
t
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
pe
r
i
o
d
i
c
re
v
i
e
w
of
gr
o
w
t
h
pa
t
t
e
r
n
s
an
d
ma
r
k
e
t
de
m
a
n
d
wi
t
h
i
n
ea
c
h
of
th
e
C
it
y
s
la
n
d
us
e
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
16
.
1
.
5
.
2
.
Ch
a
n
g
i
n
g
th
e
zo
n
i
n
g
to
R-
I
wo
u
l
d
pr
o
m
o
t
e
th
e
ab
i
l
i
t
y
fo
r
in
?
l
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
an
d
he
l
p
fa
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
pl
a
n
n
e
d
gr
o
w
t
h
wi
t
h
i
n
Ci
t
y
li
m
i
t
s
an
d
th
e
UG
A
.
Th
i
s
is
du
e
to
th
e
16
.
1
.
5
.
3
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2—
F
.
’
Di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
de
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
on
se
p
t
i
c
sy
s
t
e
m
,
an
d
at
a
de
n
s
i
t
y
be
l
o
w
th
e
mi
n
i
m
u
m
,
to
su
s
t
a
i
n
an
ur
b
a
n
le
v
e
l
of
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
.
16
.
1
.
5
.
4
.
Th
e
cu
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
of
R-
S
—
2
0
is
be
l
o
w
th
e
un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
Lo
w
-
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
La
n
d
Us
e
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
mi
n
i
m
u
m
of
3
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
pe
r
ac
r
e
.
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
,
th
e
mi
n
i
m
u
m
lo
t
si
z
e
fo
r
th
e
R-
S
—
2
0
at
ha
l
f
-
a
c
r
e
is
th
e
mi
n
i
m
u
m
si
z
e
to
al
l
o
w
e
d
fo
r
se
p
t
i
c
sy
s
t
e
m
s
.
A
zo
n
e
Z
20
2
5
-
0
0
5
O’
N
e
i
l
l
Re
z
o
n
e
Pa
g
e
5
of
8
Page 148 of 276
ch
a
n
g
e
to
R—
I
wo
u
l
d
he
l
p
to
di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
de
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
up
o
n
se
p
t
i
c
sy
s
t
e
m
s
an
d
al
l
o
w
fo
r
ho
u
s
i
n
g
at
a
de
n
s
i
t
y
in
co
n
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
.
16
.
1
.
6
.
La
n
d
Us
e
Go
a
l
4:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
th
r
o
u
g
h
pr
o
p
e
r
la
n
d
us
e
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
.
16
.
1
.
6
.
1
.
Po
l
i
c
y
4-
B
:
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
in
?
l
l
an
d
hi
g
h
de
n
s
i
t
y
us
e
s
wi
t
h
i
n
pr
o
x
i
m
i
t
y
to
ma
j
o
r
tr
a
v
e
l
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
an
d
pu
b
l
i
c
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
se
r
v
i
c
e
ar
e
a
s
.
16
.
1
.
6
.
2
.
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
is
di
r
e
c
t
l
y
o?
Ro
a
d
84
an
d
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
.1
2
mi
l
e
s
fr
o
m
W
Ar
g
e
n
t
Rd
.
bo
t
h
ma
j
o
r
co
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
s
,
al
o
n
g
wi
t
h
ac
c
e
s
s
to
Be
n
Fr
a
n
k
l
i
n
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
Ro
u
t
e
s
67
an
d
68
fr
o
m
th
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
ar
e
a
of
Ro
a
d
84
an
d
WA
r
g
e
n
t
Rd
.
Ha
v
i
n
g
hi
g
h
e
r
de
n
s
i
t
y
an
d
in
?
l
l
wo
u
l
d
fu
r
t
h
e
r
su
p
p
o
r
t
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
ar
e
a
.
Ac
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
to
bo
t
h
Pa
s
c
o
i
s
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Sy
s
t
e
m
Ma
s
t
e
r
Pl
a
n
(T
S
M
P
)
an
d
Be
n
-
F
r
a
n
k
l
i
n
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
,
“.
.
.
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
bu
s
se
r
v
i
c
e
is
pl
a
n
n
e
d
to
ex
t
e
n
d
co
v
e
r
a
g
e
al
o
n
g
Ro
a
d
84
so
u
t
h
of
[W
}
Ar
g
e
n
t
Ro
a
d
,
wi
t
h
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
se
r
v
i
c
e
al
o
n
g
th
e
en
d
of
Co
u
r
t
St
r
e
e
t
we
s
t
of
Ro
a
d
68
.
”
16
.
1
.
6
.
3
.
Po
l
i
c
y
4—
F
:
Su
p
p
o
r
t
mi
x
e
d
us
e
,
sm
a
r
t
gr
o
w
t
h
,
in
?
l
l
,
an
d
co
m
p
a
c
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
wi
t
h
tr
a
n
s
i
t
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
am
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
th
a
t
pr
o
m
o
t
e
a
he
a
l
t
h
y
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
16
.
1
.
6
.
4
.
Th
e
zo
n
e
ch
a
n
g
e
wi
l
l
al
l
o
w
fo
r
th
e
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
fo
r
co
m
p
a
c
t
in
?
l
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ne
a
r
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
tr
a
n
s
i
t
li
n
e
s
.
Th
i
s
wi
l
l
le
a
d
to
fu
r
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
th
e
su
p
p
o
r
t
of
th
o
s
e
tr
a
n
s
i
t
li
n
e
s
an
d
le
a
d
to
fu
r
t
h
e
r
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
of
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
am
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
ar
e
a
.
16
.
1
.
7
.
La
n
d
Us
e
Go
a
l
5:
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
br
o
a
d
ra
n
g
e
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
la
n
d
us
e
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
to
ac
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
a
va
r
i
e
t
y
of
li
f
e
s
t
y
l
e
s
an
d
ho
u
s
i
n
g
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
16
.
1
.
7
.
1
.
Po
l
i
c
y
5-
A
:
Al
l
o
w
a
va
r
i
e
t
y
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
n
s
i
t
i
e
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
th
e
UG
A
.
16
.
1
.
7
.
2
.
Ch
a
n
g
i
n
g
th
e
zo
n
i
n
g
to
R-
I
wi
l
l
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
th
e
va
r
i
e
t
y
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
n
s
i
t
i
e
s
in
th
e
ar
e
a
.
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
an
d
su
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
ha
v
e
a
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
n
s
i
t
y
le
v
e
l
of
2
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
pe
r
ac
r
e
.
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
,
th
i
s
ch
a
n
g
e
of
de
n
s
i
t
y
wi
l
l
sp
u
r
a
va
r
i
e
t
y
of
ho
u
s
i
n
g
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
du
e
to
th
e
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
ho
u
s
i
n
g
ty
p
e
s
al
l
o
w
e
d
wi
t
h
th
e
R-
I
Zo
n
i
n
g
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
vs
.
wh
a
t
is
al
l
o
w
e
d
fo
r
th
e
R-
S
—
2
0
Zo
n
i
n
g
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
16
.
1
.
7
.
3
.
Po
l
i
c
y
5-
B
:
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
hi
g
h
e
r
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
n
s
i
t
i
e
s
wi
t
h
i
n
an
d
ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
to
ma
j
o
r
tr
a
v
e
l
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
,
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
(C
e
n
t
r
a
l
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
)
,
an
d
Br
o
a
d
m
o
o
r
.
16
.
1
.
7
.
4
.
Th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
is
lo
c
a
t
e
d
di
r
e
c
t
l
y
oj
f
Ro
a
d
84
,
wh
i
c
h
is
li
s
t
e
d
as
a
ma
j
o
r
co
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
an
d
is
al
s
o
lo
c
a
t
e
d
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
.1
2
mi
l
e
s
fr
o
m
WA
r
g
e
n
t
Rd
.
wh
i
c
h
is
an
o
t
h
e
r
ma
j
o
r
co
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
.
Ch
a
n
g
i
n
g
th
e
zo
n
i
n
g
to
R—
I
wo
u
l
d
al
l
o
w
fo
r
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
n
s
i
t
i
e
s
ne
a
r
tw
o
ma
j
o
r
tr
a
v
e
l
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
,
he
n
c
e
fu
r
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
th
e
en
a
c
t
m
e
n
t
of
th
i
s
po
l
i
c
y
.
16
.
1
.
8
.
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
Go
a
l
1:
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
fo
r
al
l
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
se
g
m
e
n
t
s
of
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
th
e
lo
c
a
l
an
d
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
ma
r
k
e
t
.
16
.
1
.
8
.
1
.
Po
l
i
c
y
I-
A
:
Al
l
o
w
fo
r
a
fu
l
l
ra
n
g
e
of
ho
u
s
i
n
g
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
si
n
g
l
e
fa
m
i
l
y
ho
m
e
s
,
to
w
n
h
o
u
s
e
s
,
co
n
d
o
m
i
n
i
u
m
s
,
ap
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
,
an
d
ma
n
u
f
a
c
t
u
r
e
d
ho
u
s
i
n
g
,
ac
c
e
s
s
o
r
y
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
,
ze
r
o
lo
t
li
n
e
,
pl
a
n
n
e
d
un
i
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
,
et
c
.
to
th
e
cu
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
of
R-
S
—
2
0
wh
i
c
h
al
l
o
w
s
fo
r
on
l
y
si
n
g
l
e
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
an
d
ac
c
e
s
s
o
r
y
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
.
Th
i
s
wi
l
l
wo
r
k
to
en
s
u
r
e
th
a
t
th
e
Ci
t
y
wi
l
l
me
e
t
th
e
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
ne
e
d
fo
r
ho
u
s
i
n
g
.
16
.
2
.
Th
e
ef
f
e
c
t
of
th
e
pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
on
th
e
im
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
vi
c
i
n
i
t
y
wi
l
l
no
t
be
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
l
y
de
t
r
i
m
e
n
t
a
l
.
Z
20
2
5
—
0
0
5
O’
N
e
i
l
l
Re
z
o
n
e
Pa
g
e
6
of
8
Page 149 of 276
16
.
2
.
1
.
Th
i
s
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
fo
r
re
z
o
n
e
is
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
La
n
d
Us
e
El
e
m
e
n
t
an
d
me
e
t
s
th
e
in
t
e
n
t
of
th
e
Go
a
l
s
an
d
Po
l
i
c
i
e
s
fo
r
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
A
re
z
o
n
e
fr
o
m
R—
S
—
2
0
to
a
di
?
e
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
wo
u
l
d
al
l
o
w
th
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
to
be
fu
r
t
h
e
r
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
as
th
e
cu
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
do
e
s
al
l
o
w
fo
r
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
me
e
t
i
n
g
mi
n
i
m
u
m
de
n
s
i
t
y
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
16
.
2
.
2
.
A
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ac
t
i
o
n
a?
e
c
t
i
n
g
th
e
si
t
e
wo
u
l
d
be
su
b
j
e
c
t
to
th
e
St
a
t
e
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Po
l
i
c
y
Ac
t
(S
E
P
A
)
an
d
im
p
a
c
t
s
to
th
e
na
t
u
r
a
l
an
d
bu
i
l
t
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
i
n
g
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
,
wo
u
l
d
be
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
an
d
mi
t
i
g
a
t
e
d
th
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
SE
P
A
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
16
.
3
.
Th
e
r
e
is
me
r
i
t
an
d
va
l
u
e
in
th
e
pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
fo
r
th
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
as
a
wh
o
l
e
.
16
.
3
.
1.
The
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
zo
n
i
n
g
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
is
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
La
n
d
Us
e
Ma
p
an
d
th
e
Go
a
l
s
an
d
Po
l
i
c
i
e
s
as
ad
o
p
t
e
d
by
th
e
Pa
s
c
o
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
.
Th
e
pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
in
c
l
u
d
e
s
in
?
l
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
an
d
pr
o
m
o
t
e
s
th
e
go
a
l
s
of
th
e
Lo
w
-
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
La
n
d
Us
e
Ma
p
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
.
16
.
4
.
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
sh
o
u
l
d
be
im
p
o
s
e
d
in
or
d
e
r
to
mi
t
i
g
a
t
e
an
y
si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
ad
v
e
r
s
e
im
p
a
c
t
s
fr
o
m
th
e
pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
.
16
.
4
.
1
.
Th
e
re
z
o
n
e
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
pr
o
j
e
c
t
ar
e
su
b
j
e
c
t
to
th
e
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
of
th
e
Pa
s
c
o
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Co
d
e
an
d
th
e
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
De
s
i
g
n
an
d
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
St
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
As
su
c
h
,
n0
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
sh
o
u
l
d
be
im
p
o
s
e
d
;
an
y
fu
t
u
r
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
wi
l
l
be
ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
d
fo
r
si
g
n
i
?
c
a
n
t
ad
v
e
r
s
e
im
p
a
c
t
s
at
th
e
ti
m
e
of
a
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
wh
i
c
h
wi
l
l
al
s
o
be
su
b
j
e
c
t
to
re
v
i
e
w
un
d
e
r
th
e
St
a
t
e
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Po
l
i
c
y
Ac
t
(S
E
P
A
)
.
16
.
5
.
A
Co
n
c
o
m
i
t
a
n
t
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
sh
o
u
l
d
be
en
t
e
r
e
d
in
t
o
be
t
w
e
e
n
th
e
Ci
t
y
an
d
th
e
pe
t
i
t
i
o
n
e
r
;
an
d
if
so
,
th
e
te
r
m
s
an
d
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
of
su
c
h
an
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
16
.
5
.
1
.
No
Co
n
c
o
m
i
t
a
n
t
Ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
is
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
ne
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
fo
r
th
i
s
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
17
.
An
op
e
n
re
c
o
r
d
pu
b
l
i
c
he
a
r
i
n
g
wa
s
he
l
d
,
af
t
e
r
le
g
a
l
no
t
i
c
e
,
on
Ju
l
y
9,
20
2
5
18
.
Ap
p
e
a
r
i
n
g
an
d
te
s
t
i
f
y
i
n
g
on
be
h
a
l
f
of
th
e
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
wa
s
th
e
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
hi
m
s
e
l
f
,
Sh
a
n
e
O’
N
e
i
l
l
,
of
69
0
4
Ro
g
u
e
Dr
i
v
e
,
Pa
s
c
o
,
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
.
Mr
.
O’
N
e
i
l
l
te
s
t
i
?
e
d
th
a
t
he
wa
s
th
e
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
.
He
st
a
t
e
d
th
a
t
he
ha
d
re
v
i
e
w
e
d
th
e
St
a
f
f
Re
p
o
r
t
,
an
d
ag
r
e
e
d
wi
t
h
th
e
re
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
se
t
fo
r
t
h
th
e
r
e
i
n
.
Mr
.
O’
N
e
i
l
l
of
f
e
r
e
d
an
ae
r
i
a
l
vi
d
e
o
ex
h
i
b
i
t
of
th
e
su
b
j
e
c
t
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
19
.
No
me
m
b
e
r
of
th
e
pu
b
l
i
c
te
s
t
i
?
e
d
at
th
e
he
a
r
i
n
g
.
20
.
At
th
e
co
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
of
th
e
pu
b
l
i
c
he
a
r
i
n
g
,
th
e
re
c
o
r
d
wa
s
he
l
d
op
e
n
un
t
i
l
Ju
l
y
11
,
20
2
5
,
to
al
l
o
w
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
ti
m
e
to
su
b
m
i
t
th
e
ae
r
i
a
l
vi
d
e
o
ex
h
i
b
i
t
in
'
a
fo
r
m
a
t
su
i
t
a
b
l
e
fo
r
pu
b
l
i
c
re
c
o
r
d
re
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
.
It
wa
s
re
c
e
i
v
e
d
on
Ju
l
y
10
,
20
2
5
.
21
.
Wr
i
t
t
e
n
pu
b
l
i
c
co
m
m
e
n
t
s
op
p
o
s
i
n
g
th
e
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
we
r
e
su
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
by
th
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
:
21
.
1
.
Tr
i
s
h
a
Gr
e
e
n
,
ad
d
r
e
s
s
un
k
n
o
w
n
;
21
.
2
.
Ro
b
e
r
t
Gr
e
e
n
,
28
1
2
N
Rd
84
,
Pa
s
c
o
,
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
;
21
.
3
.
Ch
a
r
l
i
e
an
d
Ch
a
u
Se
m
a
,
28
1
6
Rd
84
,
Pa
s
c
o
,
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
.
22
.
1
.
Ex
.
A
St
a
f
f
Re
p
o
r
t
;
22
.
2
.
Ex
.
B
Re
m
a
i
n
d
e
r
of
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
St
a
f
f
Fi
l
e
.
22
.
3
.
Ex
.
C
Co
m
b
i
n
e
d
Wr
i
t
t
e
n
Pu
b
l
i
c
Ce
m
e
n
t
s
of
Tr
i
s
h
a
Gr
e
e
n
,
Ro
b
e
r
t
Gr
e
e
n
,
an
d
Ch
a
r
l
i
e
an
d
Ch
a
u
Se
m
a
.
Z
20
2
5
—
0
0
5
O’
N
e
i
l
l
Re
z
o
n
e
Pa
g
e
7
of
8
Page 150 of 276
23
.
24
.
22
.
4
.
Ex
.
D
Ae
r
i
a
l
Vi
d
e
o
of
Su
b
j
e
c
t
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
Th
e
Ci
t
y
of
Pa
s
c
o
He
a
r
i
n
g
Ex
a
m
i
n
e
r
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
al
l
ev
i
d
e
n
c
e
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
re
c
o
r
d
in
re
n
d
e
r
n
g
th
i
s
de
c
i
s
i
o
n
.
An
y
Co
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
of
La
w
th
a
t
is
mo
r
e
co
r
r
e
c
t
l
y
a
Fi
n
d
i
n
g
of
Fa
c
t
is
he
r
e
b
y
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
as
su
c
h
by
th
i
s
re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
.
11
.
CO
N
C
L
U
S
I
O
N
S
OF
LA
W
Th
e
He
a
r
i
n
g
Ex
a
m
i
n
e
r
ha
s
be
e
n
gr
a
n
t
e
d
th
e
au
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
to
re
n
d
e
r
a
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
to
ap
p
r
o
v
e
,
ap
p
r
o
v
e
wi
t
h
mo
d
i
?
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
/
o
r
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
,
or
re
j
e
c
t
th
e
pe
t
i
t
i
o
n
ba
s
e
d
on
it
s
?n
d
i
n
g
s
an
d
co
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
.
Th
i
s
zo
n
i
n
g
pe
t
i
t
i
o
n
is
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
th
e
Pa
s
c
o
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
an
d
Pa
s
c
o
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Co
d
e
.
An
y
Fi
n
d
i
n
g
of
Fa
c
t
th
a
t
is
mo
r
e
co
r
r
e
c
t
l
y
3
Co
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
of
La
w
is
he
r
e
b
y
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
as
su
c
h
by
th
i
s
re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
.
II
I
.
RE
C
O
N
H
V
J
E
N
D
E
D
DE
C
I
S
I
O
N
Ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
ab
o
v
e
Fi
n
d
i
n
g
s
of
Fa
c
t
an
d
Co
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
of
La
w
,
Z
20
2
5
—
0
0
5
is
he
r
e
b
y
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
fo
r
AP
P
R
O
V
A
L
.
Da
t
e
d
th
i
s
i
22
da
y
of
Ju
l
y
,
20
2
5
CI
T
Y
OF
PA
S
C
O
HE
A
R
I
N
G
EX
A
M
I
N
E
R
,
PR
O
TE
M
Ja
D.
Ey
e
s
t
o
n
e
Th
i
s
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
is
su
b
j
e
c
t
to
a
ti
m
e
l
y
?l
e
d
ap
p
e
a
l
pu
r
s
u
a
n
t
to
PM
C
25
.
2
1
0
.
0
7
0
Z
20
2
5
-
0
0
5
O’
N
e
i
l
l
Re
z
o
n
e
Pa
g
e
8
of
8
Page 151 of 276
Pa
g
e
1
5
2
o
f
2
7
6
Outlook
Oppose Rezoning from R-S-20 to R-1
From Charlie and Chau Serna <sernachas@aol.com>
Date Wed 7/9/2025 12:35 PM
To Aaron Gunderson <Gundersona@pasco-wa.gov>
Cc CHARLIE SERNA <sernachas@aol.com>
You don't often get email from sernachas@aol.com. Learn why this is important
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Pasco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open a achments
unless you are sure the content is safe.]
Hi my name is Charlie Serna living at 2816 Road 84 Pasco, WA 99301 and we oppose the
rezoning of property located at 2817 road 84 from R-S-20 to R-1.
Thanks
Sincerely
Charlie and Chau Serna
Page 153 of 276
Outlook
Public Notice - Rezone application - Z 2025-005
From Robert Green <robgreenga@gmail.com>
Date Tue 7/8/2025 10:49 PM
To Aaron Gunderson <Gundersona@pasco-wa.gov>
You don't often get email from robgreenga@gmail.com. Learn why this is important
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Pasco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open a achments
unless you are sure the content is safe.]
I am Robert Green.
I reside at 2812 N Rd 84, Pasco, WA 99301.
I do not concur with the rezoning of 2817 Road 84 from R-S-20 to R-1.
All the homes on this street are single family homes.
There is only one side of the street to park on and increasing the number of residents in one plot will
result in vehicles on the side of the street posing hazards to pedestrian traffic, bicycle traffic, and
landowners.
This was evident with the recent home construction near me.
Also, currently, there is no sewer service to our area. The 2817 Road 84 is on a septic system. Adding
multiple units would probably require sewer service which would be passed on to residents which
have been here for over 20 years including myself.
The rezoning and building of multiple units will most likely impact the resale value of the homes near
the new development.
The property was recently sold. The buyer should have considered buying a R-1 zone plot prior to
buying this plot.
Webster Court LLC is a Real Property Investment. I do not believe they have any intent in occupying
the property. The register agent is located in West Richland. (Scott Schell)
The entire area is R-S-20. There is no reason to select one plot in the middle to become R-1.
I have lived at my address for over 20 years. I was annexed into the city several years ago. Most of the
neighbors in this area have resided here for years.
I request no rezoning occurs for the convenience of a Limited Liability Company.
Thanks,
Robert W. Green
2812 Road 84
Page 154 of 276
Outlook
public notice - rezone application - Z2025-005
From Trisha Green <tlhgreen@outlook.com>
Date Tue 7/8/2025 10:50 PM
To Aaron Gunderson <Gundersona@pasco-wa.gov>
You don't often get email from tlhgreen@outlook.com. Learn why this is important
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Pasco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open a achments
unless you are sure the content is safe.]
To rezone this old neighborhood would be a crime and have a tremendous impact on those of us who
have been here for a long me. It is extremely unfair to decrease our property value a er we've had
high property taxes for many years. This would impact our daily lives going to and from work every
morning with the destruc on of our road (yet again), as they would need to do to put in sewer. There
would be cars parked all up and down the street making it very difficult and poten ally dangerous for my
daughter to walk to and from school and for my teen drivers to safely exit our property on their way to
school.
There is no reason to upset the lives of all of the people who have been here for so many years. These
are single house lots. This is a working-class family neighborhood. That is the way it's always been. Let
these people build whatever they want in an area that is zoned for what they want, not change the way
that the good people of this community have been living for many years.
sincerely,
Trisha Green
Page 155 of 276
REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers
WEDNESDAY, 09 July 2025
6:00 PM
1
MASTER FILE #: Z 2025-005
APPLICANT: Shane O’Neill
9904 Rogue Dr.
Pasco, WA 99301
REQUEST: REZONE: 2817 Road 84 (Parcel #118402034) Rezone from RS-
20 (Residential Suburban) to R-1 (Low-Density Residential)
Timeline:
23 May 2025 Application Submitted
10 June 2025 Application Deemed Complete
20 June 2025 Application Noticed for Public Hearing
2 July 2025 Public Hearing Staff Report Published
BACKGROUND
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: SHORT PLAT 2018-30 LOT 1
General Location: Located off Road 84 approximately 452 ft. north of W Livingston Rd.
Property Size: Approximately 1 acre
2. ACCESS: The parcel has access off Road 84.
3. UTILITIES: Municipal water is available off Road 84, municipal sewer is located approximately 690
feet to the north at the intersection of Road 84 and W Argent Rd.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned RS-20 (Residential Suburban) and is developed with a
single-family dwelling unit and various accessory structures. Surrounding properties are zoned
and developed as follows:
NORTH: RS-20 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS
EAST: RS-20 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS
SOUTH: RS-20 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS
WEST: RS-20 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS
5. Comprehensive Plan: The City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan designates this site as “Low Density
Residential.” The Low-Density Residential designation is described as a variety of residential
housing at a density of 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre, and may be assigned RS-20, RS-12, RS-1, R-
Page 156 of 276
2
1, R-1-A, and R-1-A2 designations. Per Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) 25.215.015, maximum gross
density of any proposed development within any zoning district, expressed as dwelling units per
acre, shall be no less than the corresponding minimum density expressed in the Comprehensive
Plan land use density table, and no greater than the corresponding maximum density expressed
in the Comprehensive Plan land use density table, except as provided in Chapter 25.161 PMC.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The zone change application is exempt from SEPA due to
the project meeting the requirements of WAC 197-11-800(c).
ANALYSIS
Request
Applicant Shane O’Neill wishes to rezone (Parcel #118402034) in Pasco, WA 99301 from RS-20
(Residential Suburban) to R-1 (Low-Density Residential). The sites comprise approximately 1 acre. The
underlying Land Use Designation is “Low Density Residential,” which specifies 3 to 6 dwelling units (DU)
per acre.
The proposed rezone does not include a project action. It is anticipated that should the rezone be
approved; a subsequent subdivision project may be submitted for review. This review would include
requirements for any impacts on the level of service for parks, transportation, etc. Any subsequent
subdivision proposals would additionally be required to adhere to the Pasco Municipal Code and
standards, including provisions such as connectivity and residential design standards. If any future project
is in excess of the categorical threshold requirements in WAC 197-11-800 though, then a SEPA will be
required to identify and mitigate potential impacts to the natural and built environments.
History
The site was annexed into the City in 2015 via Ordinance 4222 and subsequently assigned the RS-20
(Residential Suburban) zoning designation via Ordinance 4221. The site contains an existing dwelling and
a couple of accessory structures that were constructed around 1967.
Rezone Criteria
The review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in PMC. 25.210.030. The criteria are
listed below as follows:
1. The date the existing zone became effective:
The site was assigned RS-20 zoning in 2015 via Ordinance 4222
2. The changed conditions, which are alleged to warrant other or additional zoning:
In 2015 the site was annexed into the City and given the Low-Density Residential designation, and has
remained so since. Since 2015, the City of Pasco’s Comprehensive Plan has been updated to reflect a 3 to
6 dwelling unit (DU) requirement for the Low Density Residential Land Use Code. It is not possible to
develop to the minimum density requirements without rezoning to another district allowed in the under
Low Density Residential Land Use. A rezone from RS-20 (Residential Suburban) to R-1 (Low-Density
Residential) will allow the property to be developed to density requirements of Pasco’s Comprehensive
Plan.
Additionally, the zone change of the property to R-1, will allow for the applicant to develop the property
with more types of dwellings to serve the population. On January 24, 2022, Council approved Ordinance
4575, amending the Zoning code, including Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) 25.45 relating to the R-1 zoning
Page 157 of 276
3
district. The approved ordinance changed the purpose of the R-1 zone found in PMC 25.45.010, as follows:
“The R-1 low density residential district is established to provide a low- to medium-density residential
environment compliant with the Comprehensive Plan land use density table in PMC 25.215.015. Certain
public facilities and institutions may also be permitted, provided their nature and location are not
detrimental to the intended low- to medium-density residential environment.” As well, PMC 25.45.020
added zero-lot line dwellings, multiple dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, and courtyard apartments to the mix
of allowed uses in the R-1 zoning district. The density requirement in PMC 25.45.050 was also amended to
eliminate the one-unit-per-lot development restriction.
3. Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public health, safety and general
welfare:
The rezone application and proposal are consistent with the City Council-approved Comprehensive Plan,
which has been determined to be in the best interest of advancing public health, safety, and general
welfare of the community. It is hoped that further ability to subdivide and an increase of housing types on
the site will increase the desirability of the property as well as enhance the public health, safety, and
general welfare.
From a public health perspective, future residential development of the site could encourage walking to
and from school with development of proper sidewalk infrastructure. Livingston Elementary is
approximately .12 miles from the site, along with Chiawana High School located approximately .14 miles
and McLoughlin Middle School located approximately .07 miles from the site. Additionally, the site is
located approximately .58 miles from the front entrance of Chiawana Park, which borders the Columbia
River.
In terms of public safety, the site is located approximately .43 miles from Franklin County Fire District 3
Station 34 along West Court Street, well within the established response-time zone. Pasco Fire Station 85
is located approximately 1.09 miles away along Road 100.
Safety of any future residential development will also be provided for through the implementation of the
civil, building and fire codes which mandate adequate access, fire hydrants, and similar fire and life safety
improvements for all new development.
4. The effect it will have on the value and character of the adjacent property and the
Comprehensive Plan:
A change in zoning would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation
for the site which is Low Density Residential. The proposed land usage matches that of the adjacent
properties and would have a positive impact on neighboring properties.
The proposed rezone would allow for development between 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre, a requirement
applicable to both the RS-20 and the R-1 zoning districts but is unobtainable due to RS-20 minimum lot size
requirements [PMC 25.30.050(1)]. Any subsequent development actions, depending upon their intensity,
could be subject to Washington’s State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review. This review includes
identifying and mitigating any impacts to the natural and built environment.
5. The effect on the property owner or owners if the request is not granted:
According to the applicant, if the proposed zone change is not granted, it would lead to lower development
potential and reduced land value due to the current zoning allowing for less density. Over time the property
“…could become an isolated pocket of underutilized land, possibly making infrastructure extension less
cost-effective or delayed (Application Narrative, Pg. 5).” It would also add barriers in meeting housing
demand at a time where Pasco’s demand for housing is increasing. Also, keeping the zoning as RS-20 would
Page 158 of 276
4
be contrary to the City’s Comprehensive Plan due to the current zoning having a density standard less than
the minimum allowed for the property’s Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation.
6. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the property:
The City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan designates this site as “Low Density Residential.” The Low Density
Residential designation provides a variety of residential housing at a density of 3 to 6 dwelling units per
acre, and may be assigned RS-20, RS-12, RS-1, R-1, R-1-A, and R-1-A2 zoning.
7. Such other information as the Hearing Examiner requires:
The rezone application is consistent with and meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, and City Council
Goals.
STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the
background and analysis section of the staff report. The Hearing Examiner may add additional findings to
this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing.
1. Public notice of this hearing was sent to property owners within 300 feet of the property and
posted in the Tri-City Herald on June 20, 2025.
2. Applicant wishes to rezone Parcel 118402034 from RS-20 (Residential Suburban) to R-1 (Low-
Density Residential).
3. The sites comprise approximately 1 acre.
4. The City’s 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the site as “Low Density
Residential”.
5. The “Low Density Residential” designation may be developed with a variety of residential housing
including single family dwellings, zero lot line dwellings, multiple dwellings, duplexes, triplexes,
and courtyard apartments.
6. The underlying Low-Density Residential Land Use Designation specifies 3 to 6 dwelling units (DU)
per acre.
7. The site was assigned R-S-20 zoning in 2015 via Ordinance 4222.
8. Existing R-S-20 zone only has a density standard of 2 dwellings per acre, which is below the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use minimum of 3 dwellings per acre making the zone legally non-
conforming.
9. Changing the zone to R-1 Low-Density Residential would bring the property into conformance
with the Low-Density Residential Land Use Designation.
10. Location of the property is approximately .12 miles from Livingston Elementary, .14 miles from
Chiawana High School, and .07 miles from McLoughlin Middle School.
11. Location of the property is approximately .43 miles from Franklin County Fire District 3 Station 34
and 1.09 miles from Pasco Fire Station 85.
12. Location of the property is near two major road collectors (Road 84 & W Argent Rd.).
13. Parcel 118402034 contains a single-family dwelling and accessory structures built around 1967.
TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of a rezone, the Hearing Examiner must develop findings of fact
from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.210.060. The criteria are as
follows:
Page 159 of 276
5
1. The proposal is in accordance with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
The City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan designates this site as “Low Density Residential.” The Low Density
Residential designation provides a variety of residential housing at a density of 3 to 6 dwelling units per
acre, and may be assigned RS-20, RS-12, RS-1, R-1, R-1-A, and R-1-A2 zoning.
Per PMC 25.215.015 maximum gross density of any proposed development within any zoning district,
expressed as dwelling units per acre, shall be no less than the corresponding minimum density expressed
in the Comprehensive Plan land use density table, and no greater than the corresponding maximum density
expressed in the Comprehensive Plan land use density table, except as provided in Chapter 25.161 PMC.
Current zoning designation of R-S-20 has a density allowance of only 2 dwellings per acre, which is below
the minimum residential density as required for the Low-Density Residential Land Use Designation. Hence
at present the property cannot be further developed due to the density standard being below the minimum
allowed in PMC 25.215.015. Changing the zoning will allow for the property to be able to be developed at
a standard as provided under PMC 25.215.015.
The proposed rezone application would implement or be consistent with the following comp plan
goals/polices:
Land Use Goal 2: Plan for a variety of compatible land uses within the UGA.
Policy 2-B: Facilitate planned growth within the City limits and UGA, and promote infill
developments in the City limits through periodic review of growth patterns and market demand
within each of the City’s land use designations.
Changing the zoning to R-1 would promote the ability for infill development and help facilitate
planned growth within City limits and the UGA. This is due to the increased density limits and types
of housing allowed.
Policy 2-F: Discourage developments dependent on septic system, and at a density below the
minimum, to sustain an urban level of services.
Land Use Goal 4: Increase community accessibility through proper land use planning.
Policy 4-B: Encourage infill and high density uses within proximity to major travel corridors and
public transportation service areas.
The Property is located directly off Road 84 and approximately .12 miles from W Argent Rd. both
major collectors, along with access to Ben Franklin Transit Routes 67 and 68 from the intersection
area of Road 84 and W Argent Rd. Having higher density and infill would further support services
within the area. According to both Pasco’s Transportation System Master Plan (TSMP) and Ben-
Franklin Transit Development Plan, “…additional bus service is planned to extend coverage along
Road 84 south of [W} Argent Road, with continued service along the end of Court Street west of
Road 68.”
Policy 4-F: Support mixed use, smart growth, infill, and compact developments with transit and
pedestrian amenities that promote a healthy community.
The zone change will allow for the increased potential for compact infill development near existing
transit lines. This will lead to furthering the support of those transit lines and lead to further
development of pedestrian amenities within the area.
Land Use Goal 5: Maintain a broad range of residential land use designations to accommodate a variety
of lifestyles and housing opportunities.
Page 160 of 276
6
Policy 5-A: Allow a variety of residential densities throughout the UGA.
Changing the zoning to R-1 will increase the variety of residential densities in the area.
Additionally, this change of density will spur a variety of housing opportunities due to the increased
housing types allowed with the R-1 Zoning District vs. what is allowed for the R-S-20 Zoning
District.
Policy 5-B: Encourage higher residential densities within and adjacent to major travel corridors,
Downtown (Central Business District), and Broadmoor.
The property is located directly off Road 84, which is listed as a major collector and is also located
approximately .12 miles from W Argent Rd. which is another major collector. Changing the zoning
to R-1 would allow for increased residential densities near two major travel corridors, hence
furthering the goals of this policy.
Housing Goal 1: Encourage housing for all economic segments of the City’s population consistent with the
local and regional market.
Policy 1-A: Allow for a full range of housing including single family homes, townhouses,
condominiums, apartments, and manufactured housing, accessory dwelling units, zero lot line,
planned unit developments, etc.
Changing the zone to R-1 will allow for an increase of housing types in comparison to the current
zoning of R-S-20 which allows for only single-family dwellings and accessory dwelling units. This
will work to ensure that the City will meet the increased need for housing.
2. The effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity will not be materially detrimental.
This application for rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and meets the
intent of the Goals and Policies for the property. A rezone from R-S-20 to a different zoning district would
allow the property to be further developed as the current zoning does allow for development meeting
minimum density requirements.
A development action affecting the site would be subject to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
and impacts to the natural and built environment, including neighboring properties, would be considered
and mitigated through the SEPA process.
3. There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole.
The proposed zoning designation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and the Goals
and Policies as adopted by the Pasco City Council. The proposal includes infill development and promotes
the goals of the Low-Density Residential Land Use Map Designation.
4. Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the
proposal.
The rezone application and anticipated project are subject to the regulations and requirements of the
Pasco Municipal Code and the City of Pasco Design and Construction Standards. As such, no conditions
should be imposed; any future development will be evaluated for significant adverse impacts at the time
of a development application, which will also be subject to review under the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA).
5. A Concomitant Agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and if
so, the terms and conditions of such an agreement.
No Concomitant Agreement is considered necessary for this application.
Page 161 of 276
7
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions herein, that 2817 Road 84 (Parcel
118402034) be rezoned from RS-20 (Residential Suburban) to R-1 (Low-Density Residential).
Page 162 of 276
May 23, 2025Z2025-005
Page 163 of 276
Page 164 of 276
Page 165 of 276
Page 1 of 6
Clover Planning & Zoning, LLC
Land Use Services
May 21, 2025
Rezone Application Supplemental Code Criteria Narrative
To: CITY OF PASCO Planning Staff, Hearing Examiner, & City Council
Subject: Rezone Application of Franklin County Tax Parcel # 118402034
(2817 Road 84) From RS-20 to R-1
The nature and effect of the proposed change:
The nature of the proposed rezone is residential. The effect of rezoning the site to R-1 would be to
increase residential density consistent with the Low Density Residential Comprehensive Plan land use
designation (3-6 units/ac). Increased residential density would bring the density into conformance with
the Comp. Plan as the current 2.2 unit/ac density is below the 3 units/ac minimum residential density
allowed by the LUD designation.
What conditions warrant the proposed rezone?
Rezoning parcel #118402034 from RS-20 (Suburban Residential) to R-1 (Low Density Residential) is
warranted based on the following recent changed conditions, as required under Pasco Municipal Code
25.45.010.
1. Proximity to Developing Urban Residential Areas
The parcel lies near land already transitioning or designated for urban residential densities. The
Comprehensive Plan outlines continued residential growth in areas surrounding the parcel, particularly
near Road 68 and Burns Road, reflecting a move toward higher residential densities and infrastructure
investment in that vicinity.
2. Annexation and Infrastructure Expansion
Pasco has annexed substantial areas near the subject parcel and is extending public infrastructure (water,
sewer, roads), which supports urban density development. The area is identified in urban growth
expansion planning, indicating a shift from large-lot rural to smaller-lot suburban development.
3. Housing Needs and Policy Direction
Page 166 of 276
Page 2 of 6
The Comprehensive Plan highlights the need for a broader range of housing types and lot sizes, including
those permitted under R-1 zoning. Goals include providing affordable, accessible housing and using land
efficiently—both of which are supported by rezoning to R-1 from RS-20, which has larger lot
requirements and fewer units per acre.
4. Compatibility with the Land Use Designation
The Future Land Use Map designates this area as “Low Density Residential,” which aligns with R-1
zoning but is denser than RS-20. Rezoning would better conform to the intended long-term land use
designation and community vision adopted in the plan. An increased residential density would bring the
density into conformance with the Comp. Plan as the current zoning allowance for 2.2 units/ac density
is below the 3 units/ac minimum residential density allowed by the LUD designation.
Conclusion
Recent annexations, infrastructure development, increasing housing demand, and alignment with the
city’s long-range planning goals serve as changed conditions justifying a rezoning from RS-20 to R-1
under Pasco Municipal Code § 25.45.010. This rezoning would be consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan and help accommodate projected population growth while supporting efficient land use.
How will the proposed rezone advance the health, safety, and general welfare of the community?
Rezone approval will foster development of vacant land which will remove habitat for rodents, insects
and invasive vegetation. Development of the vacant land will enhance the aesthetic appeal of a blighted
property thereby improving the character of the neighborhood.
What effect will the proposed change have on the value and character of adjacent property?
The proposed rezone of parcel #118402034 from RS-20 to R-1 will have enhance the value and character
of adjacent property.
1. Increase in Property Value Through Infrastructure and Market Demand
Rezoning to R-1 typically increases development potential, which:
• Raises land value due to greater allowed density (more lots = more potential homes),
• Stimulates investment interest in nearby parcels,
• May lead to infrastructure upgrades (e.g., utilities, roads), which benefit all properties in the area.
Effect: Adjacent property owners may see increased land value over time, particularly if their zoning or
infrastructure also supports further development.
2. Gradual Shift Toward a More Urban Neighborhood Character
RS-20 zoning supports a semi-rural environment with large lots. Rezoning to R-1 allows for:
• Smaller lots and more homes per acre,
• A more traditional suburban neighborhood form (e.g., sidewalks, streetlights, connected roads),
• Newer construction, which will raise the aesthetic quality of the area.
Page 167 of 276
Page 3 of 6
Effect: The character of the area may gradually shift toward a more urbanized residential setting,
especially if adjacent parcels rezone or redevelop similarly.
3. Minimal Compatibility Issues at Low Density
R-1 still maintains low-density residential standards:
• Similar building types (single-family detached homes),
• Setback, height, and lot coverage requirements are compatible with existing RS-20 homes,
• No commercial or multi-family development is introduced under R-1 zoning.
Effect: Visual and functional compatibility with existing homes remains high. The transition is unlikely
to cause disruption or visual dissonance.
4. Potential for More Local Traffic, But Within Planned Capacity
An increase in residential density may:
• Add to local traffic volumes, though modestly under R-1 zoning,
• Lead to road and utility (sewer) improvements, which benefit overall accessibility and safety.
Effect: Slight increase in vehicle trips, but usually manageable with infrastructure improvements and
modern street design. The change is consistent with city growth patterns.
5. Stronger Demand for Public Services
Increased housing can drive:
• More use of schools, parks, and public utilities,
• But also brings more tax base to help fund those services.
Effect: Enhanced service delivery and potential future investment in area amenities.
Summary
The rezone is expected to:
• Raise adjacent property values over time through market demand and infrastructure growth,
• Encourage a gradual, compatible transition to suburban residential character,
• Maintain land use compatibility, and
• Deliver community-level benefits through improved services and connectivity.
Overall, the change supports long-term neighborhood stability and property value enhancement without
disrupting the existing residential fabric.
How does the proposed rezone relate to the City’s Comprehensive Plan?
The proposed rezone of parcel #118402034 from RS-20 (Suburban Residential) to R-1 (Low Density
Residential) is strongly aligned with the City of Pasco’s 2018–2038 Comprehensive Plan in several
important ways:
1. Consistency with Future Land Use Designation
Rezoning to R-1 implements the plan’s land use designations more faithfully than RS-20. The
Comprehensive Plan identifies Low Density Residential areas as appropriate for R-1 zoning,
Page 168 of 276
Page 4 of 6
which allows 2–5 units per acre. This is more consistent with R-1 than with RS-20, which is
semi-rural and allows only ~2 units per acre.
"Low Density Residential: Single family residential development at a density of 2 to 5 dwelling
units per acre."
— Table LU-1, Comprehensive Plan
2. Supports Projected Population Growth and Housing Need
R-1 zoning supports the Plan’s goal of accommodating growth while avoiding urban sprawl.
The Plan forecasts Pasco's population growing to 121,828 by 2038, requiring over 15,000 new
housing units. R-1 zoning enables more efficient use of residential land to help meet this
demand.
“This will require 15,217 residential units, considering Pasco’s household size…”
— Table LU-4, Comprehensive Plan
3. Encourages Efficient Land Use and Infrastructure Investment
The rezone leverages existing/planned infrastructure and promotes cost-effective growth. The
Plan emphasizes directing growth to areas where urban infrastructure exists or is planned.
The area near the subject parcel is seeing infrastructure expansion, including roads, utilities,
and annexation efforts.
“New development is encouraged to locate in UGAs where adequate public facilities and
services can be provided in an efficient and economical manner.”
— Land Use Element, Comprehensive Plan
4. Supports Infill and Redevelopment Strategies
R-1 zoning is a practical step to support infill housing in line with policy. The parcel is in or
near areas identified as suitable for infill development, which the City sees as key to meeting
housing needs and enhancing neighborhood vitality.
“One of the biggest opportunities for Pasco is through the implementation of infill and
redevelopment strategies.”
— Land Use Element
5. Promotes Housing Diversity and Affordability
Rezoning helps fulfill the city’s housing policy goals. The Comprehensive Plan stresses the
importance of providing affordable and diverse housing types for a growing and diverse
population. R-1 zoning allows for more variety than RS-20, which limits housing to large lots.
“The Comprehensive Plan should encourage the availability of affordable housing... promote a
variety of residential densities and housing types…”
— Housing Element
Page 169 of 276
Page 5 of 6
Summary
The rezone is a direct and appropriate implementation of the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed rezone from RS-20 to R-1:
• Matches the future land use map,
• Supports population and housing forecasts,
• Aligns with infrastructure planning,
• Advances affordability and housing choice goals, and
• Facilitates orderly urban growth per the City’s long-term vision.
What effect will be realized by the owner(s) if the proposed rezone is not granted?
If the proposed rezone from RS-20 to R-1 is not granted, the owner(s) of the parcel will face several
significant limitations and impacts:
1. Lower Development Potential
• RS-20 zoning allows only 1 dwelling unit per 20,000 square feet, which equates to approximately
2.2 units per acre.
• In contrast, R-1 zoning allows up to 4.35 dwelling units per acre (based on minimum lot size of
10,000 sq ft).
Effect:
The owner will be restricted to fewer lots/dwelling units, substantially reducing the property's residential
development yield and thus its economic value.
2. Reduced Land Value
• The market value of land is closely tied to how many units it can accommodate.
• Without rezoning, developers or investors will likely assign a lower value to the property due
to reduced profit potential.
Effect:
The owner will likely experience lower sale value or appraised value, and less interest from residential
developers.
3. Incompatibility with Adjacent Growth Trends
• If nearby parcels are zoned or rezoned to R-1 or higher densities, RS-20 becomes increasingly
inconsistent with surrounding development.
• The parcel could become an isolated pocket of underutilized land, possibly making infrastructure
extension less cost-effective or delayed.
Effect:
The parcel may become less competitive and less desirable for integration into coordinated residential
development projects.
Page 170 of 276
Page 6 of 6
4. Barriers to Meeting Housing Demand
• The owner would not be able to contribute to meeting Pasco’s increasing demand for housing in
a high-growth area.
• This could further complicate future rezone efforts, as the city's focus may shift to more strategic
areas.
Effect:
A missed opportunity for the owner to capitalize on timing, when housing needs and policy goals align
with upzoning.
5. Continued Restriction on Use
• RS-20 zoning is generally intended for semi-rural or very low-density suburban use.
• RS-20 zoning may prohibit or complicate the introduction of smaller homes, duplexes, or diverse
housing types even if the land could otherwise support it.
Effect:
The owner may be forced to hold or use the land in a suboptimal way, inconsistent with modern
development patterns and land use goals.
Summary
If the rezone is not granted, the owner will be constrained by:
• Significantly reduced development density and value,
• Lost economic opportunity in a rapidly urbanizing corridor,
• Misalignment with infrastructure investments and planning objectives.
In short, denying the rezone would leave the owner at a strategic and financial disadvantage in
comparison to nearby properties that may already benefit from urban zoning designations.
Please reach out to Clover Planning & Zoning LLC if your review would benefit from any additional
information.
Sincerely,
Shane O’Neill
Clover Planning & Zoning LLC
www.planclover.com
(509)713-4560
planclover@outlook.com
UBI# 604-914-810
Exhibit List
1) Maps
2) Vicinity Images
3) Site Video https://youtu.be/ah6YVu8bhz4
Page 171 of 276
Page 172 of 276
Page 173 of 276
Page 174 of 276
Page 175 of 276
Exhibit 2
Page 176 of 276
Exhibit 2
Page 177 of 276
Exhibit 2
Page 178 of 276
Exhibit 2
Page 179 of 276
Community & Economic Development Department
PO Box 293, 525 N 3rd Ave, Pasco, WA 99301
P: 509.545.3441 / F: 509.545.3499
CITY OF PASCO
DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS
This notice is required by RCW 36.70B.070
FILE #s: Z2025-005
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Rezone
APPLICANT: Shane O’Neill
6904 Rogue Dr.
Pasco, WA 99301
PROJECT NAME: Webster Court R-S-20 to R-1
It has been determined that your application for a rezone is complete for processing by the City of Pasco.
These materials will be dispersed to City departments and affected agencies for review and comment.
Questions can be addressed to the City of Pasco, Community & Economic Development Department at
509-905-2604 or gundersona@pasco-wa.gov referencing the file # above.
Date Issued: 06/02/2025____________
Staff Contact: Aaron Gunderson
Planner II, Community & Economic Development Department
509.905.2604/gundersona@pasco-wa.gov
Page 180 of 276
AFN#1829810 ORDIN
06102/2015 09:15 AM
4 Page(s)$75.00
Matt Beaton,Auditor
Franklin Co..WA
ORDINANCE NO. 1712
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,ADOPTING PRE-ANNEXATION
ZONING FOR THE ROAD 80 ANNEXATION AREA AND ESTABLISHING RS-20 ZONING
FOR SAID AREA.
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.14.330 authorizes the City Council to adopt proposed zoning
regulations that become effective upon annexation of any area that that might reasonably be expected
to be annexed by the City at any future time;and,
WHEREAS, the proposed Road 80 Annexation Area includes all unincorporated lands west
of Road 80;and,
WHEREAS, on the April 16, 2015 the Pasco Planning Commission held a public hearing to
developed a zoning recommendation for the proposed Road 80 Annexation Area;and,
WHEREAS,pursuant to RCW 35A. 14. 340,the City Council held a public hearing on April
20, 2015 and June 1, 2015 providing all interested individuals the opportunity to comment on the
proposed pre-zoning;and,
WHEREAS,based upon substantial evidence,that: (A)the proposed pre-zoning is consistent
with the adopted Comprehensive Plan;(B)the proposed pre-zoning is consistent with or promotes the
goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan serving the general public interest in the community;
and (C) a pending annexation is the warranting factor demanding the change of zoning classification
from the County zoning regulations to the City zoning regulations;and NOW,THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.Pre-Zoning Established for the Road 80 Annexation Area. That under the authority
of RCW 35A.14.330, and pursuant to the notice and hearing requirements set forth in RCW
35A.14.340,the Pasco City Council hereby adopts pre-annexation zoning for the Road 80 Annexation
area or any portion thereof as and described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B". Said
annexation area shall be zoned RS-20 as defined and described in Title 25 of the Pasco Municipal
Code and said annexation area shall be subject to all standards and associated regulations pertaining to
said zone,as existing at the time of annexation.
The RS-20 zoning established herein shall remain in full force and effect for a period of five years
from the effective date of annexation.
Section 2. The proposed zoning(RS-20)regulations set forth in Section 1 shall become effective
upon annexation to the City of Pasco as it applies to those properties described in Exhibit"A"attached
hereto and made a part of this ordinance.
Section 3. A copy of this ordinance,duly certified as a true copy by the City Clerk of the City Of
Pasco shall be filed with the Franklin County Auditor.
Page 181 of 276
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ROAD 80 ANNEXATION AREA
Beginning at a point on the south line of the FCID canal right-of-way, said point being the intersection
with the west right-of-way line of Road 96 and the south right-of-way line of the FCID canal right-of-
way; Thence southerly along the west right-of-way line of Road 96 to the intersection with the northeast
corner of Lot 2 Short Plat 99-05; Thence westerly along the north line of Lot 2 Short Plat 99-05 to the
northwest corner thereof; Thence southerly along the west line of Lot 2 Short Plat 99-05 to the
southwest corner thereof, said southwest corner also being a point on the north line of Lot, 3 Basswood
Estates; Thence westerly along the north line of Lot 3, Basswood Estates to the northwest corner of said
Lot 3; Thence southerly along the west line of said Lot 3 to the southwest corner of said Lot 3, said
corner also being the northwest corner of Lot 4, Basswood Estates; Thence southerly along the west line
of Lot 4, Basswood Estates to the southwest corner of said Lot 4, said southwest corner also being the
northwest corner of Lot 4 Short Plat 2003-01; Thence southerly along the west line of Lot 4, Short Plat
2003-01 to the north right-of-way line of West Argent Road; Thence west along the north right-of-way
line of West Argent Road to the intersection with the northerly projection of the east right-of-way line of
Road 100; Thence southerly along said projection to the intersection with the south right-of-way line of
West Argent Road; Thence continuing southerly along the east right-of-way line of Road 100 to the
intersection with the north right-of-way line of West Court Street; Thence easterly along the north right-
of-way line of West Court Street to the intersection with the east right-of-way line of Road 84; Thence
southerly along the east right-of-way line of Road 84 to the intersection with the northwest corner of Lot
13, Block 1, Back Roads Country Estates; Thence easterly along the north line of said Lot 13, Back
Roads Country Estates and continuing easterly along the north line of Lots 14, and 15, Block 1, Back
Roads Country Estates to the intersection with the northeast corner of said Lot 15, said corner of said Lot
15, being 635.78 feet more or less from the east right-of-way line of West Court Street; Thence southerly
for a distance of 24 feet; Thence easterly for a distance of 6 feet to the northeast/southwest line of Lot 17,
Block I, Back Roads Country Estates; Thence easterly along the north line of said Lot 17 and Lots 18,
19, 20, 21 and 22, Block I, Back Roads Country Estates to the intersection with the west right-of-way
line of Road 80; Thence continuing easterly along the easterly projection of the north line of Lot 22,
Block 1 Back Roads Country Estates to the intersection with the east right-of-way line of Road 80;
Thence northerly along the east right-of-way line of Road 80 to the intersection with the northwest corner
of Lot 4, Short Plat 76-10; Thence westerly along the westerly projection of the north line of Lot 4,
Short Plat 76-10 to the intersection with the west right-of-way line of Road 80; Thence northerly along
the west right-of-way Road 80 to the intersection with the south right-of-way line of West Argent Road;
Thence westerly along the south right-of-way line of West Argent Road to the intersection with the east
right-of-way line of Road 84; Thence westerly along the westerly projection of the south right-of-way
line of West Argent Road to the intersection with the southerly projection of the west right-of-way line of
Road 84; Thence northerly along said projection of Road 84 and continuing northerly along the west
right-of-way line of Road 84 to the intersection with the south right-of-way line of the FCID canal right-
of-way; Thence westerly along said canal right-of-way to the point of beginning.
Page 182 of 276
Exhibit 'B'
Road 80 &nnexationArea
r co,
v
r
M
c.
Vr
N
Arent Road
0111\\\\
IAnnexationArea •
o
Court0.
cis
Street . . ,_...
a
1
I
Page 183 of 276
Section 4. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage
and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law
this 1st day of June 2015.
Matt Watkins
Mayor
ATT .T:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
g ` 0 ,
ie.ra L.Clark, ity Cl- Leland B. Kerr,City Attorney
Page 184 of 276
WHEN RECORDED PLEASE RETURN TO:
City of Pasco
Attn: City Planner
525 North 3'a
Pasco, WA 99301
ORDINANCE NO. qZZ21—
AFN # 1830490 ORD
06/16/2015 09:55 AM
6 Page(s) $77.00
Matt Beaton, Auditor
Franklin Co.. WA
AN ORDINANCE relating to annexation and annexing certain real property to the City of Pasco.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco has declared, its intent to annex the
following described territory (Section 1.) known as the Road 80 Annexation Area to the City of
Pasco pursuant to RCW Chapter 35A.14; and
WHEREAS, in January of 2015 the City Council approved the formation of an
Annexation Facts Committee" to review information related to the possible annexation of all
unincorporated properties west of Road 80; and
WHEREAS, said "Annexation Facts Committee" consisted of residents and property
owners only from within the proposed Road 80 annexation Area; and
WHEREAS, a legally sufficient intent to commence annexation proceedings by the direct
petition method of annexation was prepared by City staff and received by the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on May 18, 2015 to review the notice
of intent to commence annexation proceedings for the Road 80 Annexation Area; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 3640 on May 18, 2015 accepting the
proposed territory for annexation, determining that simultaneous zoning would be required and
that the annexation area will not require the assumption of existing City bonded indebtedness; and,
WHEREAS, on June 1, 2015 the second of two public hearings on zoning for the
proposed annexation area was held to afford the public an opportunity to provide input on
proposed zoning regulations for the proposed Road 80 Annexation Area; and,
Page 185 of 276
WHEREAS, following testimony at June 1, 2015 public hearing the City Council of the
City of Pasco adopted Ordinance No. 4221 establishing RS -20 (Suburban District) for the
proposed Road 80 Annexation Area; and,
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 4221 was recorded in the Office of the Franklin County
Auditor's on June 2, 2015; and,
WHEREAS, the Franklin County Assessor on June 2, 2015 officially certified the
sufficiency of the annexation petition prepared and filed by City officials; and,
WHEREAS, the Road 80 Annexation Area is situated within the designated Pasco Urban
Growth Area; and,
WHEREAS, City of Pasco utilities, police, fire and other services are adequate and
available to serve the proposed annexation area; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing on the proposed annexation was published and
posted as required by law; and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the proposed annexation was held on June 15, 2015; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that annexation of the Road 80 area will improve the
efficiency and distribution of necessary municipal services within the City's designated Urban
Growth Area, to the benefit of all Pasco residents and taxpayers; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following described area, situated in Franklin County, Washington to -
wit:
Beginning at a point on the south line of the FCID canal right-of-way, said point being the
intersection with the west right-of-way line of Road 96 and the south right-of-way line of the
FCID canal right-of-way; Thence southerly along the west right-of-way line of Road 96 to the
intersection with the northeast corner of Lot 2 Short Plat 99-05; Thence westerly along the north
line of Lot 2 Short Plat 99-05 to the northwest corner thereof, Thence southerly along the west
line of Lot 2 Short Plat 99-05 to the southwest comer thereof, said southwest corner also being a
point on the north line of Lot, 3 Basswood Estates; Thence westerly along the north line of Lot 3,
Basswood Estates to the northwest corner of said Lot 3; Thence southerly along the west line of
said Lot 3 to the southwest comer of said Lot 3, said corner also being the northwest comer of Lot
4, Basswood Estates; Thence southerly along the west line of Lot 4, Basswood Estates to the
southwest corner of said Lot 4, said southwest corner also being the northwest corner of Lot 4
Short Plat 2003-01; Thence southerly along the west line of Lot 4, Short Plat 2003-01 to the north
right-of-way line of West Argent Road; Thence west along the north right-of-way line of West
Argent Road to the intersection with the northerly projection of the east right-of-way line of Road
100; Thence southerly along said projection to the intersection with the south right-of-way line of
2-
Page 186 of 276
West Argent Road; Thence continuing southerly along the east right-of-way line of Road 100 to
the intersection with the north right-of-way line of West Court Street; Thence easterly along the
north right-of-way line of West Court Street to the intersection with the east right-of-way line of
Road 84; Thence southerly along the east right-of-way line of Road 84 to the intersection with the
northwest corner of Lot 13, Block 1, Back Roads Country Estates; Thence easterly along the north
line of said Lot 13, Back Roads Country Estates and continuing easterly along the north line of
Lots 14, and 15, Block 1, Back Roads Country Estates to the intersection with the northeast corner
of said Lot 15, said corner of said Lot 15, being 635.78 feet more or less from the east right-of-way
line of West Court Street; Thence southerly for a distance of 24 feet; Thence easterly for a
distance of 6 feet to the northeast/southwest line of Lot 17, Block 1, Back Roads Country Estates;
Thence easterly along the north line of said Lot 17 and Lots 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22, Block 1, Back
Roads Country Estates to the intersection with the west right-of-way line of Road 80; Thence
continuing easterly along the easterly projection of the north line of Lot 22, Block I Back Roads
Country Estates to the intersection with the east right-of-way line of Road 80; Thence northerly
along the east right-of-way line of Road 80 to the intersection with the northwest corner of Lot 4,
Short Plat 76-10; Thence westerly along the westerly projection of the north line of Lot 4, Short
Plat 76-10 to the intersection with the west right-of-way line of Road 80; Thence northerly along
the west right-of-way Road 80 to the intersection with the south right-of-way line of West Argent
Road; Thence westerly along the south right-of-way line of West Argent Road to the intersection
with the east right-of-way line of Road 84; Thence westerly along the westerly projection of the
south right-of-way line of West Argent Road to the intersection with the southerly projection of
the west right-of-way line of Road 84; Thence northerly along said projection of Road 84 and
continuing northerly along the west right-of-way line of Road 84 to the intersection with the south
right-of-way line of the FCID canal right-of-way; Thence westerly along said canal right-of-way
to the point of beginning.
as depicted in the map attached hereto and labeled Exhibit "A" and the same is hereby annexed to
the City of Pasco and is hereby declared to be within the corporate limits of the City of Pasco.
Section 2. That the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Pasco be and the same is hereby
adopted for the above described tract of land.
Section 3. That said tract of land shall not assume any portion of the existing bonded
indebtedness of the City of Pasco.
Section 4. That said tract of land shall be in Voting District # 5.
Section 5. That the annexation area shall be zoned RS -20 (Suburban District) per pre-
zone Ordinance No. 4221 adopted by the Pasco City Council following a public hearing on June 1,
2015 and recorded with the Franklin County Auditor on June 2, 2015 under Auditors File No.
1829810.
Section 6. That a certified copy of this ordinance be and the same shall be filed with the
Franklin County Commissioners.
Section 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on July 1, 2015.
3-
Page 187 of 276
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 15'h day of June 2015.
Matt Watkins, Mayor
A APPROVED AS TO FORM
n 6
Debra Clark, City Clerk L B. Kerr, City Attorney
0
Page 188 of 276
Page 189 of 276
Page 190 of 276
Page 191 of 276
Page 192 of 276
Page 193 of 276
Page 194 of 276
Page 195 of 276
Community Development D epartment
PO Box 293, 525 N 3 rd Ave, Pasco, WA 99301
P: 509.545.3441 / F: 509.545.3499
Page 1 of 2
PUBLIC NOTICE
Si necesita ayuda para entender este aviso o necesita m ás información, por favor llame al Departamento
de Desarrollo Comunitario y Económico de la Ciudad de Pasco a 509-545-3441.
A public hearing with the Hearing Examiner will be held on July 09, 2025 at 6:00 pm
Place: Council Chambers in Pasco City Hall at 525 N 3rd Avenue in Pasco, Washington.
Proposal: Shane O’Neill on behalf of Webster Court, LLC has submitted a rezone application (Z 2025-005)
from R-S-20 (Suburban) to R-1 (Low Density Residential ) for one parcel with a size of approximately 1
acre, located at 2817 Road 84 (Parcel #118402034) in Pasco, WA 99301. The proposal is subject to
regulations contained in the Pasco Municipal Code. Future site -specific development applications will be
subject to SEPA environmental review and code requirements.
Public Comment Period: Written comments must be submitted to the Community Development
Department by 5:00 p.m. on July 09, 2025, to be included in the Hearing Examiner packet. If you have
questions on the proposal, contact the Planning Division at (509) 905-2604 or via e -mail to:
gundersona@pasco-wa.gov.
If you wish to participate in the hearing virtually, please register at least 2 hours prior to the meeting
at the following registration link:
www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the
webinar.
Estimated Date of the Decision: It is estimated that the Hearing Examiner will make a recommendation
on the rezone within ten (10) days of the public hearing.
Prepared 23 June 2025 by: Aaron Gunderson , Planner II, PO Box 293 Pasco, WA 99301 (509) 905-2604
The City of Pasco welcomes full participation in public meetings by all citizens. No qualified individual with a disability s hall be
excluded or denied the benefit of participating in such meetings. If you wish to use auxiliary aids or require assistance t o comment
at this public meeting, please contact the Community Development Department at (509) 545 -3441 or TDD (509) 585-4425 at least
ten days prior to the date of the meeting to make arrangements for special needs.
Page 196 of 276
Page 2 of 2
Page 197 of 276
Page 198 of 276
Page 199 of 276
Page 200 of 276
Page 201 of 276
Z2025-005:Webster Court, R-S-20 to
R-1
08/18/2025
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
2
0
2
o
f
2
7
6
Z2025-005: Webster Court, R-S-20 to R-1
2
Public Hearing & Hearing Examiner
Determination:
•July 09, 2025
•Recommendation of Approval
Site Information:
•Parcel: 118402034
•Size: Approximately 1.00 acre in
size.
•Current Zoning District:
•R-S-20, Suburban
•Proposed Zoning District:
•R-1, Low-Density
Residential
Pa
g
e
2
0
3
o
f
2
7
6
Z2025-005: Webster Court, R-S-20 to R-1
3
Pa
g
e
2
0
4
o
f
2
7
6
4
Z2025-005: Webster Court, R-S-20 to R-1
Pa
g
e
2
0
5
o
f
2
7
6
5
Z2025-005: Webster Court, R-S-20 to R-1
Requirements for Zoning Petition (PMC 25.210.030)
•The date the existing zone became effective;
•The changed conditions which are alleged to warrant other or
additional zoning;
•Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public
health, safety and general welfare;
•The effect it will have on the value and character of the adjacent
property and the Comprehensive Plan;
•The effect on the property owner or owners if the request is not
granted;
•The Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the property;
and
•Such other information as the Hearing Examiner requires.
Pa
g
e
2
0
6
o
f
2
7
6
6
Z2025-005: Webster Court, R-S-20 to R-1
Process (Chapter 25.210 PMC)
Rezone
Petition and
Application
PMC
25.210.020(
1)
Public
Notice
PMC
25.210
.040
Public
Hearing
w/Hearing
Examiner
PMC
25.210.02
0(1)(c)
Hearing Examiner
Findings +
Recommendation
PMC 25.210.060
City
Council
Regular
Business
Meeting
PMC
25.210.0
80
Pa
g
e
2
0
7
o
f
2
7
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 13, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 8/18/25
FROM: Griselda Garcia, Interim Director
Finance
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 4784 - Carryover Funds for Capital Projects from 2023-
2024 Biennium (1 minute staff presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Ordinance - Budget Amendment
Capital Projects with Proposed Carryover Budgets
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4784, amending the 2025-2026
Biennial Budget (Ordinance No. 4750) of the City of Pasco, Washington, by
providing supplement thereto; to provide for additional appropriation from the
carryover of the prior year budget to complete capital projects and, further,
authorize publication by summary only.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Various Funds - $61,627,834
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Budget carry forward/carryover for capital projects is a business standard
adopted by a majority of organizations. This process accommodates project
schedules crossing budget periods and schedule delays. The City of Pasco
had not adopted this process, resulting in staff expending significant time to
make estimates for the year during the budgeting process and resulting in
inaccurate budget authorizations when such basis of estimates changed.
During 2021-2022 Biennial Budget preparation, staff recommended a change
in the budgeting process to allow for the carryover budgeting for capital
projects. Operational budgets will continue to be authorized during the biennial
budgeting process and any changes to the budget will be brought to Council as
such needs are identified. The project carryover process has been in practice
since this implementation in 2021.
Page 208 of 276
Staff utilizes a project accounting module in the financial system that allows for
the tracking of the project budgets in an effective and centralized manner.
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff has prepared a carryover budget adjustment request to Council, which is
attached. The carryover requests are calculated with not just an authorized
budget at the time of its approval, but new information provided by various
departments. Staff has reduced the budget where necessary and appropriate;
however, any request to increase budget will be routed to Council as such
needs are identified.
Staff presented to Council during August 11th Council Workshop meeting. Due
to the benefit to project management process for City's significant capital
programs, staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance.
Page 209 of 276
Ordinance – 2025-2026 Capital Projects Budget Amendment- 1
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING THE 2025-2026 BIENNIAL BUDGET (ORDINANCE NO. 4750)
OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, BY PROVIDING SUPPLEMENT
THERETO; TO PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION FROM THE
CARRYOVER OF PRIOR YEAR BUDGET TO COMPLETE CAPITAL
PROJECTS.
WHEREAS, on December 9, 2024, the Pasco City Council approved Ordinance No.
4750, adopting the 2025-2026 Capital Projects Budget; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to carry over unexpended appropriations from the prior
budget period to the current budget period for uncompleted capital improvement projects; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco Finance Department, in coordination with the Public Works
Department and Parks and Recreation Department, determined carryover funds available to
individual capital improvement projects; and
WHEREAS, the application of funds has been identified, and the City Council of the City
of Pasco finds and determines that such amendment of the 2025-2026 Biennial Budget is in the
best interests of residents of the City of Pasco and will promote the general health, safety and
welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to RCW 35A.34.200, the 2025-2026 Biennial Budget be and the
same is hereby amended to provide for carry forward of unexpended balances of the preceding
budget, amending revenues, transfers in, expenditures, and transfers out by providing authority
of any necessary transfer of money within or between funds indicated, and their subsequent
impact to end fund balance:
FUND EXPENDITURES REVENUE
GENERAL FUND 23,908,367 126,800
MULTIMODAL 70,000
PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 424,100
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND -
REET 170,100
STADIUM FUND 160,200
Page 210 of 276
Ordinance – 2025-2026 Capital Projects Budget Amendment- 2
FUND EXPENDITURES REVENUE
GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 26,794,467 26,294,467
WATER/SEWER UTILITY FUND 14,390,215
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND -
GOVT. 7,200
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND -
UTILITY 153,300
Total 65,644,749 26,294,467
Section 2. That the additions in appropriation and expenditures are hereby declared to
exist in the above funds for the said uses and purposes as shown above and the proper City
officials are hereby authorized and directed to issue warrants and transfer funds in accordance
with the provision of the Ordinance.
Section 3. Except as amended herein, Ordinance No. 4750 as previously adopted
heretofore shall remain unchanged.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word
of this Ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this
Ordinance.
Section 5. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this Ordinance, including scrivener’s errors
or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulation s; or
numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take full force and
effect five (5) days after approval, passage, and publication as required by law.
Page 211 of 276
Ordinance – 2025-2026 Capital Projects Budget Amendment- 3
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this ___ day of August,
2025.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ________________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Published: _____________________________
Page 212 of 276
CIP Category Project
Requested
Carryover into
2025 - 2026
Budget Funding Source
Parks & Rec Specialty Kitchen 126,800 ARPA
Parks & Rec Softball Complex Updates 170,100 Capital Improvement Fund - REET
Parks & Rec Road 80/84 Park 424,100 Park Development Fund
Parks & Rec Road 80/84 Park 100,000 Unsecured Grant
Parks & Rec Cemetery Estate Fence/Wall 350,000 General Fund
Parks & Rec City Hall Remodel/Updates (Fire panel, paint, elevators, HVAC) 800,000 2023 Bond xfer from General Fund
Parks & Rec City Hall Refurb Phase 2 (recreation and planning) 160,000 General Fund
Parks & Rec Gesa Stadium MLB Required Improvements 160,200 Stadium Fund
Parks & Rec Multimodal Door Replacement 70,000 Multimodal Fund
Parks & Rec Mobile Stage 131,200 General Fund
2,492,400
Buildings & Facilities Police HQ Generator 119,867 General Fund
Building & Facilities Kennel Purchases - Animal Control Facility 566,500 2023 Bond xfer from General Fund
Building & Facilities Kennel Purchases - Animal Control Facility 44,100 DSNCOR
Building & Facilities Kennel Purchases - Animal Control Facility 44,100 DNSCOK
Building & Facilities Kennel Purchases - Animal Control Facility 478,300 General Fund
1,252,867
Roadway Court St /Rd 68 Intersection Improvements 159,000 GSFEDDOT
Roadway Court St /Rd 68 Intersection Improvements 881,800 TIB
Roadway Broadmoor Tax Incr Fin Project 579,000 TIF Bond xfer from General Fund
Roadwork Road 108 Sandifur Parkway Extension 14,689,000 TIF Bond xfer from General Fund
Roadwork Burns Rd/Broadmoor Blvd Intersection Improvements 886,000 TIF Bond xfer from General Fund
Roadwork Sandifur Pkwy/Broadmoor Blvd Intersection Improvements 5,500,000 TIF Bond xfer from General Fund
Roadwork Sylvester Street Safety Improvements 478,000 GSFEDDOT
Roadwork Sylvester Street Safety Improvements 97,700 GSWADOT
Roadwork Oregon Avenue Overlay 15,000 GSFEDDOT
23,285,500
Water Transmission Main - WPWTP to Zone 3 1,236,800 Water Rates
Water WP WTP Expansion (Phase 2) 151,700 Water Expansion Restricted Cash
Water Broadmoor Burns Intersection 22,500 2023 Bonds - TIF Area
Water Sandifur Pkwy/Broadmoor Intersection 85,000 2023 Bonds - TIF Area
Water Sandifur Pkwy Road 108 extension 327,700 2023 Bonds - TIF Area
Water Water line work at Sylvester Street Storm Project 22 396 250,000 2023 Bonds - TIF Area
Water Permanganate Dosing at Butterfield WTP 19,600 Water Rates
Irrigation Irrigation System Expansion 1,110,000 2023 Bonds
Irrigation Broadmoor Burns Intersection Improvements 148,000 2023 Bonds - TIF Area
Irrigation Sandifur Parkway/Broadmoor Intersection 92,000 2023 Bonds - TIF Area
Irrigation Sandifur Parkway Road 108 Extension 217,000 2023 Bonds - TIF Area
Sewer Sandifur Parkway/Broadmoor Intersection 3,900 Sewer Expansion Restricted Cash
Sewer Sandifur Parkway Road 108 Extension 129,000 Sewer Expansion Restricted Cash
Sewer East UGA Expansion Sewer 160,000 2025 Bond
PWRF PWRF Irrigation System - Farm Upgrades 4,851,500 2023 Bonds
Stormwater Schlagel Park 362,000 2023 Bonds
Stormwater Sylvester Stormwater 250,000 Stormwater rates
9,416,700
Equip Replc-Govt. Parks Tractors - Ordered 2024, but received/paid in 2025 72,000
Existing fund balance via
contributions
Equip Replc-Utilities Stormdrain Vehicle - Ordered 2024, but received/paid in 2025 97,600
Existing fund balance via
contributions
Equip Replc-Utilities Court Vehicle - Ordered 2024, but received/paid in 2025 57,700
Existing fund balance via
contributions
227,300
36,674,767
Total Equipment Replacement
Grand Total
Roadway
Total Roadway
Utilities
Total Utilities
Equipment Replacement
Carryovers
Parks & Rec
Total Parks & Rec
Buildings & Facilities
Total Buildings & Facilities
Page 213 of 276
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 13, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 8/18/25
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4640 - Enacting the City Council Speed Limit Setting
Policy (3 minute staff presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution
City Council Speed Limit Setting Policy
City Council Speed Limit Setting Policy with Track Changes
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4640, adopting and approving the
City Council Speed Limit Setting Policy.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Speed limits are established to inform motorists of the maximum allowable
travel speed for a roadway under favorable conditions. These posted limits
serve as a critical element of traffic control, providing a consistent basis for
enforcement and promoting predictable driver behavior.
The City of Pasco sets and modifies speed limits under the authority granted
by the State of Washington. These laws provide the statutory and regulatory
foundation for speed limit setting within the City of Pasco. All speed limit
decisions must comply with these provisions to ensure they are enforceable,
promote public safety, and withstand legal scrutiny.
In late 2024, Council directed staff to provide a policy that would allow Council
to adjust speed limits in accordance with state law.
Page 214 of 276
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff have developed a procedure in alignment with RCW 46.61.415(3) for City
Council Speed Limit Setting. Council has reviewed and provided comments.
Staff addressed the comments in keeping with state law and policy purpose.
Attached is the latest draft speed limit setting policy, a red-lined version
reflecting changes made as the result of feedback provided by Council related
to the previous draft policy, and a clean version fully incorporating the red-lined
revisions.
The purpose of this policy is to ensure that speed limits within the City of Pasco
are applied consistently, transparently, and in accordance with state law and
engineering best practices. By aligning speed limits with roadway conditions,
land use context, and observed traffic patterns, the City aims to enhance public
safety, support efficient mobility, and foster community confidence in the
transportation system.
Staff recommends approving the resolution to adopt the City Council Speed
Limit Setting Policy.
Page 215 of 276
Resolution - Establish City Council Speed Limit Policy - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
ADOPTING AND APPROVING THE CITY COUNCIL SPEED LIMIT
SETTING POLICY.
WHEREAS, the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Section 46.61.400 establishes the
general speed limits across Washington State; and
WHEREAS, RCW Section 46.61.415 authorizes local governments to increase or
decrease speed limits on city highways based on an engineering and traffic investigation, with a
distinction between nonarterial highways and other highways; and
WHEREAS, RCW Section 46.61.440 allows local jurisdictions to reduce speed limits to
20 mph in school or playground zones, with specific requirements for signage and enforcement
penalties; and
WHEREAS, the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Section 468-95-045 provides
guidance on setting speed limits in 5 mph increments, based on engineering study or traffic
investigation, and consistency in signage and visibility; and
WHEREAS, RCW 46.61.415 provides an exception to performing an engineering and
traffic investigation, wherein local governments may establish a 20-mph speed limit on a
nonarterial highway or portion thereof if the local government has developed procedures for the
establishment of maximum speed limits under the relevant statute; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco’s City Council has guided the development of speed limit
setting procedures for their use within city limits.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council approves and adopts the City Council Speed Limit Setting Policy,
attached hereto as Exhibit A, to provide a process to determine speed limits and establish
procedures to allow speed limit reductions without the use of an engineering and traffic
investigation on certain local nonarterial highways.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager is authorized to take all necessary actions
to implement this Policy.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 216 of 276
Resolution - Establish City Council Speed Limit Policy - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
David Milne
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, MMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 217 of 276
City of Pasco
City Council Speed Limit Setting Policy
August 2025
Page 218 of 276
Introduction
Speed limits are established to inform motorists of the maximum allowable travel speed for a
roadway under favorable conditions. These posted limits serve as a critical element of traffic
control, providing a consistent basis for enforcement and promoting predictable driver behavior.
The purpose of this policy is to ensure that speed limits within the City of Pasco are applied
consistently, transparently, and in accordance with state law and engineering best practices. By
aligning speed limits with roadway conditions, land use context, and observed traffic patterns, the
City aims to enhance public safety, support efficient mobility, and foster community confldence in
the transportation system.
Legal Authority
The City of Pasco sets and modifles speed limits under the authority granted by the State of
Washington. These laws provide the statutory and regulatory foundation for speed limit setting
within the City of Pasco. All speed limit decisions must comply with these provisions to ensure they
are enforceable, promote public safety, and withstand legal scrutiny.
The following Revised Code of Washington (RCW) and Washington Administrative Code (WAC)
sections provide the legal foundation for establishing, modifying, and enforcing speed limits on
public roadways:
Revised Code of Washington (RCW)
• RCW 46.61.400 – Basic Rule and Maximum Limits
Establishes the general speed limits across the state:
o 25 mph on city and town streets
o 50 mph on county roads
o 60 mph on state highways
Speed limits must be appropriate for roadway conditions and may not exceed these
limits unless otherwise authorized.
o The maximum speed limits set forth in this section may be altered as authorized in
RCW 46.61.405, 46.61.410, and 46.61.415.
• RCW 46.61.415 – When Local Authorities May Alter Maximum Limits
Authorizes local governments to increase or decrease speed limits on city streets based on
an engineering and traffic investigation. The statute requires consistency with safe and
efficient traffic operations. This section makes a distinction between nonarterial roadways
and all others.
• RCW 46.61.440 – Speed Limits in School or Playground Crosswalks
Allows local jurisdictions to reduce speed limits to 20 mph in school or playground zones,
with speciflc requirements for signage and enforcement times.
Page 219 of 276
Washington Administrative Code (WAC)
• WAC 468-95-045 – Speed Limits
Part of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) as adopted in Washington.
This section provides guidance on:
o Setting speed limits in 5 mph increments
o Using engineering judgment and studies
o Ensuring consistency in signing and visibility
There is an exception to performing an engineering and traffic investigation. As provided for in RCW
46.61.415 above, Council may establish a 20 MPH speed limit on a nonarterial street or portion
thereof without an engineering and traffic investigation if a procedure has been created. This
document serves to establish this procedure.
Citywide Safety Goals
This policy incorporates citywide safety goals by reference as established in the Transportation
System Master Plan, Local Road Safety Plan, and Comprehensive Safety Action Plan as amended
and developed.
Context and Driver Behavior
In addition to regulatory speed limits described above, drivers are expected to reduce speeds
further from the posted speed limit under certain conditions (e.g. poor visibility, adverse weather,
congestion, warning signs). Advisory signage may be used in particular areas to alert drivers to
speciflc roadway conditions and provide additional guidance for the appropriate travel speed on a
roadway in a given location. While advisory speed limits do not carry the same force of law as
posted regulatory speed limits, motorists can be cited under the basic speed rule as driving too fast
for the prevailing conditions.
The character or “feel” of a roadway can also infiuence travel speeds. Median islands, landscaped
boulevards or urban design treatments, and varying roadside development are but a few examples
of roadway features that can infiuence prevailing travel speeds. This is largely because drivers tend
to select operating speeds based on the visual scene presented to them; therefore, the speed limit
and design of the road must work in concert if desired operating speeds are to be achieved. Special
situations also may exist which include school zones, work zones, and variable speed zones or
other advisory speed conditions.
Understanding the above, the following factors will be considered when establishing or adjusting
speed limits to ensure they are appropriate for the speciflc context:
• Adjacent land uses (residential, commercial, institutional)
• Presence of schools, parks, and playgrounds
• Pedestrian and bicycle activity levels and proximity to the travel lane(s)
Page 220 of 276
• Roadway geometry, sight distances, and traffic control devices
• Historical crash data and safety concerns
Framework
The application of this speed limit policy is grounded in the principles of safety, consistency, and
evidence-based decision making. It establishes a clear framework for how speed limits are
evaluated, recommended, and enacted within the City of Pasco.
Roles and Responsibilities
• City Council
The City Council serves as the legislative body with flnal authority to establish or amend
speed limits by ordinance. Council decisions will be informed by the flndings and
recommendations presented by the Public Works Department and may consider additional
input from residents, stakeholders, and other public agencies.
• Public Works Department
The Public Works Department is responsible for initiating and conducting evaluations of
existing or proposed speed limits. This includes reviewing roadway conditions, traffic
volumes, crash histories, surrounding land uses, and input from the Police and Fire
Departments. The department prepares recommendations based on engineering judgment
and best practices, including the guidance set forth in national standards such as the
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
Public Involvement
Community engagement is a vital component of the speed limit setting process. Input from
residents, businesses, neighborhood groups, and advocacy organizations will be considered when
speed limits are under review. The City will strive to ensure that speed limit decisions support
equitable outcomes across all neighborhoods including considerations for all users.
Engineering and Traffic Evaluation
Speed limits will be established or modifled based on an engineering and traffic investigation that
considers a variety of factors, including but not limited to:
• Land Use Context (roadside development, density, adjacent land use, zoning, on-street
parking)
• Geometric Features (roadway curvature, grade, shoulder width, pavement width, lane
widths, sight distance)
• Driveway Access Density
• Roadway Functional Classiflcation
• Crash History
Page 221 of 276
• Active Transportation Use (number of users, types of users e.g. children, seniors, mobility
impaired, etc., proximity to ped/bike generators such as trails, schools, parks, transit)
• Active Transportation Facilities (existing and whether the city is planning for facilities in the
future based on the Transportation Master Plan)
• Vehicle Speed Characteristics (50th and 85th percentile)
• Traffic Volumes
The following items are not required but may support a more comprehensive review:
• Enforcement and Traffic Citation History
• History of Past Speed Studies or Speed Limit Changes on the Roadway
• Public Testimony
The above data items are consistent with criteria listed in the updated MUTCD and are supportive of
data listed in NACTO City Limits. The engineering and traffic evaluation is based on these factors
and will be considered in determining a recommended speed limit. This evaluation ensures that
speed limits refiect the actual operating environment and support safe travel for all users.
Roadway Design
Since posted limits alone may not infiuence driver behavior, potential roadway design treatments
such as lane narrowing, medians, pedestrian refuge islands, or traffic calming will be considered as
part of the evaluation.
Procedure
The City of Pasco utilizes a context-sensitive approach to setting speed limits that refiects the
diverse characteristics and functions of its roadways. This framework provides general guidance for
establishing speed limits aligned with roadway classiflcation and surrounding land use.
Roadway Categories
Speed limits will be established according to the functional classiflcation of roadways, which
considers their role in the transportation network:
Arterial Roads
The procedures for determining the appropriate speed limit on an arterial should include a robust
collection of data for the subject roadway segment. Engineering and Traffic Investigations may
include a speed study conducted consistent with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD) that provides guidance on the collection and analysis of data.
The following procedures should be followed in setting regulatory speed limits:
Page 222 of 276
1. Observe vehicle operating speeds and conduct speed study data collection for subject
segments under free fiow traffic conditions. Determine 85th percentile speed and 50th
percentile speed for the study segment.
2. Collect all other data.
3. Determine the “suggested speed limit” based on data inputs shown in the Engineering and
Traffic Evaluation section above.
4. Consider how the suggested speed limit impacts non-vehicular uses of or near the right of
way.
5. If the “suggested speed limit” does not match the desired speed limit based on the
engineer’s evaluation of the corridor, consider other interventions, as needed, to encourage
lower driving speeds in conjunction with the speed limit reduction.
6. Collaborate with City Police Department in the formulation of flndings for an appropriate
speed limit. Consider the department’s opinions on the ability to feasibly enforcement
regulatory speed limit on this segment.
7. Document the flndings of the Engineering and Traffic Investigation in a written report. This
evaluation should include a thorough description of any recommended speed limit.
8. Where modiflcations from the current Speed Limit Ordinance in effect are justifled (either to
raise or lower a posted regulatory speed), prepare proposed modiflcations to said
ordinance and seek City Council approval based on the flndings of the Engineering and
Traffic Investigation.
Local Residential Streets
Pursuant to RCW 46.61.415, the City of Pasco City Council has the authority to establish a
maximum speed limit of twenty miles per hour on a nonarterial highway without an engineering
study, so long as there are procedures that dictate where this may occur. When one or more local
streets is considered for a 20 MPH speed limit, the following procedures shall be followed:
1. Identify the boundaries of the street or neighborhood that will receive the new
maximum speed limit and assure all boundaries from arterials can be clearly deflned
with a new posted speed limit.
2. Conflrm that streets within the boundary will receive the new maximum speed limit.
Determine if there are any streets that are classifled "Local” but operate at a higher use
class and should maintain a higher speed limit.
3. Notify residents within the boundaries of the anticipated speed limit change.
4. Complete the speed limit ordinance process to formally change the speed to 20 MPH.
5. Change the signage and markings in the fleld as needed.
Page 223 of 276
6. Collect “before” speed and volume data before the speed limit change is approved and
changed in the fleld.
7. Collect “after” data a minimum of three months after the speed limit is changed.
8. If within 12 months of the decision to set the maximum speed limit to 20MPH the City
Council determines that the change has not been effective, they may by a majority vote
restore the previous speed limit without an Engineering and Traffic Investigation.
Implementation Consistency
Speed limits will be set in accordance with state laws and guidelines, including compliance with
the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Limits will be posted clearly and
consistently to promote understanding and compliance among motorists.
Review and Adjustment
To maintain an effective and responsive speed limit system, the City of Pasco commits to regularly
reviewing posted speed limits and making adjustments as necessary based on evolving conditions
and new data.
Periodic Review
Speed limits will be reviewed at least every three to flve years or sooner if warranted by changes in
roadway characteristics, land use, or traffic patterns. This routine evaluation ensures that speed
limits remain appropriate and continue to support safety and mobility objectives.
Criteria for Re-Evaluation
In addition to scheduled reviews, speed limits may be re-evaluated in response to:
• Signiflcant increases in crash frequency or severity
• Community requests or concerns regarding safety or traffic speeds
• Changes in roadway design, such as new development or traffic control measures
• Updated traffic or engineering studies indicating a need for modiflcation
Documentation and Accountability
All reviews and subsequent adjustments will be documented thoroughly, including the data
analyzed, flndings, and rationale for any changes. Documentation will be maintained by the Public
Works Department in accordance with the RCW 42.56 as amended and made available to
stakeholders upon request to ensure transparency and accountability.
Page 224 of 276
Appendix
Definitions
85th Percentile Speed – The speed at or below which 85 percent of free-fiow motor vehicle traffic is
moving.
50th Percentile Speed – The speed at or below which 50 percent of free-fiow motor vehicle traffic is
moving.
Arterial Road – Arterial roadways serve a large percentage of travel between activity centers,
especially when minimizing travel time and distance is important. For this reason, Arterials typically
are roadways with high traffic volumes and are frequently the route of choice for buses and trucks.
Engineering and Traffic Investigation – the assessment of conditions by a professional engineer
licensed in the fleld of transportation and/or the assessment of conditions by a designee working
under the direct supervision of a professional engineer licensed in the fleld of transportation with
the purpose of determining flndings that may inform further study, action, or recommended plan
associated with a transportation related issue. The assessment may be qualitative based or
quantifled based on data, facts, or other pertinent information. Engineering and Traffic
Investigations need not result in written documentation of the assessment and/or flndings.
Engineering and Traffic Investigations may however lead to a written report at the discretion of the
Engineer, if resources allow and found necessary.
Speed Study – A summary report of the collected fleld data which refiects the speed at which
vehicles are passing a particular location. The speed study shall include at a minimum the
summary determination of the 85th percentile speed and 50th percentile speed for free fiowing
traffic by direction and may include other speed indicators such as mean or average speed. Where
practical, infiuences from close proximity to traffic signals should be avoided and the general
application of speed studies should be consistent with the guidance contained in the MUTCD.
Legal Reference
RCW 46.61.400
Basic rule and maximum limits.
(1) No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent
under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. In every
event speed shall be so controlled as may be necessary to avoid colliding with any person, vehicle
or other conveyance on or entering the highway in compliance with legal requirements and the duty
of all persons to use due care.
(2) Except when a special hazard exists that requires lower speed for compliance with subsection
(1) of this section, the limits specifled in this section or established as hereinafter authorized shall
Page 225 of 276
be maximum lawful speeds, and no person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed in excess
of such maximum limits.
(a) Twenty-flve miles per hour on city and town streets;
(b) Fifty miles per hour on county roads;
(c) Sixty miles per hour on state highways.
The maximum speed limits set forth in this section may be altered as authorized in
RCW 46.61.405, 46.61.410, and 46.61.415.
(3) The driver of every vehicle shall, consistent with the requirements of subsection (1) of this
section, drive at an appropriate reduced speed when approaching and crossing an intersection or
railway grade crossing, when approaching and going around a curve, when approaching a hill crest,
when traveling upon any narrow or winding roadway, and when special hazard exists with respect to
pedestrians or other traffic or by reason of weather or highway conditions.
RCW 46.61.415
When local authorities may establish or alter maximum limits.
*** CHANGE IN 2025 *** (SEE 5595.SL, attached) ***
(1) Whenever local authorities in their respective jurisdictions determine on the basis of an
engineering and traffic investigation that the maximum speed permitted under
RCW 46.61.400 or 46.61.440 is greater or less than is reasonable and safe under the conditions
found to exist upon a highway or part of a highway, the local authority may determine and declare a
reasonable and safe maximum limit thereon which
(a) Decreases the limit at intersections; or
(b) Increases the limit but not to more than 60 miles per hour; or
(c) Decreases the limit but not to less than 20 miles per hour.
(2) Local authorities in their respective jurisdictions shall determine by an engineering and traffic
investigation the proper maximum speed for all arterial streets and shall declare a reasonable and
safe maximum limit thereon which may be greater or less than the maximum speed permitted
under RCW 46.61.400(2) but shall not exceed 60 miles per hour.
(3)(a) Local authorities in their respective jurisdictions may establish a maximum speed limit of 20
miles per hour on a nonarterial highway or part of a nonarterial highway.
(b) A speed limit established under this subsection by a local authority does not need to be
determined on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation if the local authority has
developed procedures regarding establishing a maximum speed limit under this subsection. Any
speed limit established under this subsection may be canceled within one year of its
establishment, and the previous speed limit reestablished, without an engineering and traffic
Page 226 of 276
investigation. This subsection does not otherwise affect the requirement that local authorities
conduct an engineering and traffic investigation to determine whether to increase speed limits.
(c) When establishing speed limits under this subsection, local authorities shall consult the manual
on uniform traffic control devices as adopted by the Washington state department of
transportation.
(4) The secretary of transportation is authorized to establish speed limits on county roads and city
and town streets as shall be necessary to conform with any federal requirements which are a
prescribed condition for the allocation of federal funds to the state.
(5) Any altered limit established as hereinbefore authorized shall be effective when appropriate
signs giving notice thereof are erected. Such maximum speed limit may be declared to be effective
at all times or at such times as are indicated upon such signs; and differing limits may be
established for different times of day, different types of vehicles, varying weather conditions, and
other factors bearing on safe speeds, which shall be effective when posted upon appropriate flxed
or variable signs.
(6) Any alteration of maximum limits on state highways within incorporated cities or towns by local
authorities shall not be effective until such alteration has been approved by the secretary of
transportation.
WAC 468-95-045
Speed limit sign (R2-1).
Revise MUTCD Section 2B.13 to read:
Standard:
Speed Limits (R2-1) signs (see Figure 2B-1) shall display the speed limit established by statute;
or, by an ordinance or regulation adopted by the authorized agency, based on the engineering
study or traffic investigation required by RCW 46.61.405, 46.61.410, and 46.61.415. The speed
limit shall be set in multiples of - 5 mph.
Guidance:
Authorized agencies should reevaluate speed limits on segments of their roadways that have
undergone a signiflcant change in roadway characteristics or surrounding land use since the last
review.
No more than three speed limits should be posted on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly.
When evaluating speed limits, the following factors should be considered:
• The 85th percentile speed of vehicles traveling on the road;
• Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance;
• The pace speed;
Page 227 of 276
• Roadside development and environment;
• Parking practices and pedestrian activity;
• Reported crash experience for at least a 12 month period; and
• Other factors such as route development or comprehensive plans.
Option:
Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: One to designate passenger car speeds, including any
nighttime information or minimum speed that may apply; and, the other to show any special speed
limits for trucks and other vehicles.
A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be
installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is shown at the proper times.
A changeable message sign that displays to drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be
installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.
Guidance:
If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend your speed
xx (mph) or such similar legend should be shown. The color of the changeable message legend
should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.
Support:
Advisory Speed signs are discussed in Sections 2C.08, 2C.14, and 2C.15. Temporary Traffic Control
Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 47.36.030. WSR 11-23-101, § 468-95-045, flled 11/18/11, effective
12/19/11. Statutory Authority: Chapter 34.05 RCW and RCW 46.36.030 [RCW 47.36.030]. WSR 05-
23-003, § 468-95-045, flled 11/3/05, effective 12/4/05.]
Functional Classiflcation Map
Hosted by WSDOT here: https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/data/tools/geoportal/?conflg=functionalclass
Found in the Pasco Transportation System Master Plan: https://www.pasco -
wa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/64056/Pasco -TSMP-Entire-Plan---June-2022-Final_r?bidId=
Page 228 of 276
CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT
ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5595
Chapter 300, Laws of 2025
69th Legislature
2025 Regular Session
SHARED STREETS
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 27, 2025
Passed by the Senate April 17, 2025
Yeas 31 Nays 18
JOHN LOVICK
President of the Senate
Passed by the House April 11, 2025
Yeas 64 Nays 32
LAURIE JINKINS
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
CERTIFICATE
I, Sarah Bannister, Secretary of
the Senate of the State of
Washington, do hereby certify that
the attached is ENGROSSED SENATE
BILL 5595 as passed by the Senate
and the House of Representatives on
the dates hereon set forth.
SARAH BANNISTER
Secretary
Approved May 17, 2025 11:21 AM FILED
May 19, 2025
BOB FERGUSON
Governor of the State of Washington
Secretary of State
State of Washington
Page 229 of 276
AN ACT Relating to establishing shared streets; amending RCW 1
46.61.250, 46.61.415, 46.61.110, 46.61.240, and 46.61.770; and adding 2
a new section to chapter 46.61 RCW.3
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:4
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 46.61 5
RCW to read as follows:6
(1)(a) A local authority may designate a nonarterial highway, 7
except as provided in (b) of this subsection, to be a shared street 8
under this section, if the local authority has developed procedures 9
for establishing shared streets.10
(b) Nonarterial highways that are state highways may not be 11
designated shared streets unless they are the primary roads through a 12
central business district.13
(2) Vehicular traffic traveling along a shared street shall yield 14
the right-of-way to any pedestrian, bicyclist, or operator of a 15
micromobility device on the shared street.16
(3) A bicyclist or operator of a micromobility device shall yield 17
the right-of-way to any pedestrian on a shared street.18
(4) Any local authority that designates a nonarterial highway to 19
be a shared street as provided by this section must post an annual 20
report on the local authority's website of the number of traffic 21
ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5595
AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE
Passed Legislature - 2025 Regular Session
State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session
By Senators Alvarado, Liias, Frame, Nobles, Pedersen, Saldaña, and
Shewmake
Read first time 01/30/25. Referred to Committee on Transportation.
p. 1 ESB 5595.SLPage 230 of 276
accidents, including those that involve a pedestrian, bicyclist, or 1
operator of a micromobility device, that occurred on the designated 2
shared street. The report must also include the number of speeding 3
violations and driving under the influence violations that occurred 4
on the designated shared street.5
(5) For purposes of this section:6
(a) "Micromobility device" means personal or shared nonmotorized 7
scooters, "motorized foot scooters" as defined in RCW 46.04.336, and 8
"electric personal assistive mobility devices" (EPAMD) as defined in 9
RCW 46.04.1695; and10
(b) "Shared street" means a city street designated by placement 11
of official traffic control devices where pedestrians, bicyclists, 12
and vehicular traffic share a portion or all of the same street.13
Sec. 2. RCW 46.61.250 and 2022 c 235 s 3 are each amended to 14
read as follows:15
(1) Where sidewalks are provided and are accessible, it is 16
unlawful for any pedestrian to walk or otherwise move along and upon 17
an adjacent roadway. Where sidewalks are provided but wheelchair 18
access is not available, persons with disabilities who require such 19
access may walk or otherwise move along and upon an adjacent roadway 20
until they reach an access point in the sidewalk.21
(2) Where sidewalks are not provided or are inaccessible, a 22
pedestrian walking or otherwise moving along and upon a highway, and 23
any personal delivery device moving along and upon a highway, shall:24
(a) When shoulders are provided and are accessible, walk or move 25
on the shoulder of the roadway as far as is practicable from the edge 26
of the roadway, facing traffic when a shoulder is available in this 27
direction; or28
(b) When shoulders are not provided or are inaccessible, walk or 29
move as near as is practicable to the outside edge of the roadway 30
facing traffic, and when practicable, move clear of the roadway upon 31
meeting an oncoming vehicle.32
(3) A pedestrian traveling to the nearest emergency reporting 33
device on a one-way roadway of a controlled access highway is not 34
required to travel facing traffic as otherwise required by subsection 35
(2) of this section.36
(4) When walking or otherwise moving along and upon an adjacent 37
roadway, a pedestrian shall exercise due care to avoid colliding with 38
any vehicle upon the roadway.39
p. 2 ESB 5595.SLPage 231 of 276
(5) Subsections (1) and (2) of this section do not apply when the 1
roadway is duly closed to vehicular traffic by placement of official 2
traffic control devices for the sole purposes of pedestrian and 3
bicyclist use of the roadway.4
(6) Subsections (1), (2), and (4) of this section do not apply on 5
a shared street as defined in section 1 of this act.6
Sec. 3. RCW 46.61.415 and 2022 c 235 s 1 are each amended to 7
read as follows:8
(1) Whenever local authorities in their respective jurisdictions 9
determine on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation 10
that the maximum speed permitted under RCW 46.61.400 or 46.61.440 is 11
greater or less than is reasonable and safe under the conditions 12
found to exist upon a highway or part of a highway, the local 13
authority may determine and declare a reasonable and safe maximum 14
limit thereon which15
(a) Decreases the limit at intersections; or16
(b) Increases the limit but not to more than 60 miles per hour; 17
or18
(c) Decreases the limit but not to less than 20 miles per hour.19
(2) Local authorities in their respective jurisdictions shall 20
determine by an engineering and traffic investigation the proper 21
maximum speed for all arterial streets and shall declare a reasonable 22
and safe maximum limit thereon, which may be greater or less than the 23
maximum speed permitted under RCW 46.61.400(2) but shall not exceed 24
60 miles per hour.25
(3)(a) Local authorities in their respective jurisdictions may 26
establish a maximum speed limit of 20 miles per hour on a nonarterial 27
highway or part of a nonarterial highway or a maximum speed limit of 28
10 miles per hour on a shared street as defined in section 1 of this 29
act.30
(b) A speed limit established under this subsection by a local 31
authority does not need to be determined on the basis of an 32
engineering and traffic investigation if the local authority has 33
developed procedures regarding establishing a maximum speed limit 34
under this subsection. Any speed limit established under this 35
subsection may be canceled within one year of its establishment, and 36
the previous speed limit reestablished, without an engineering and 37
traffic investigation. This subsection does not otherwise affect the 38
p. 3 ESB 5595.SLPage 232 of 276
requirement that local authorities conduct an engineering and traffic 1
investigation to determine whether to increase speed limits.2
(c) When establishing speed limits under this subsection, local 3
authorities shall consult the manual on uniform traffic control 4
devices as adopted by the Washington state department of 5
transportation.6
(4) The secretary of transportation is authorized to establish 7
speed limits on county roads and city and town streets as shall be 8
necessary to conform with any federal requirements, which are a 9
prescribed condition for the allocation of federal funds to the 10
state.11
(5) Any altered limit established as hereinbefore authorized 12
shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are 13
erected. Such maximum speed limit may be declared to be effective at 14
all times or at such times as are indicated upon such signs; and 15
differing limits may be established for different times of day, 16
different types of vehicles, varying weather conditions, and other 17
factors bearing on safe speeds, which shall be effective when posted 18
upon appropriate fixed or variable signs.19
(6) Any alteration of maximum limits on state highways within 20
incorporated cities or towns by local authorities shall not be 21
effective until such alteration has been approved by the secretary of 22
transportation.23
Sec. 4. RCW 46.61.110 and 2023 c 471 s 4 are each amended to 24
read as follows:25
The following rules shall govern the overtaking and passing of 26
vehicles proceeding in the same direction:27
(1)(a) The driver of a vehicle overtaking other traffic 28
proceeding in the same direction shall pass to the left of it at a 29
safe distance and shall not again drive to the right side of the 30
roadway until safely clear of the overtaken traffic.31
(b)(i) When the vehicle being overtaken is a motorcycle, motor-32
driven cycle, or moped, a driver of a motor vehicle found to be in 33
violation of (a) of this subsection must be assessed an additional 34
fine equal to the base penalty assessed under RCW 46.63.110(3). This 35
fine may not be waived, reduced, or suspended, unless the court finds 36
the offender to be indigent, and is not subject to the additional 37
fees and assessments that the base penalty for this violation is 38
subject to under RCW 2.68.040, 3.62.090, and 46.63.110.39
p. 4 ESB 5595.SLPage 233 of 276
(ii) The additional fine imposed under (b)(i) of this subsection 1
must be deposited into the vulnerable roadway user education account 2
created in RCW 46.61.145.3
(2)(a) The driver of a vehicle approaching an individual who is 4
traveling as a pedestrian or on a bicycle, riding an animal, or using 5
a farm tractor or implement of husbandry without an enclosed shell, 6
and who is traveling in the right lane of a roadway or on the right-7
hand shoulder or bicycle lane of the roadway, shall:8
(i) On a roadway with two lanes or more for traffic moving in the 9
direction of travel, before passing and until safely clear of the 10
individual, move completely into a lane to the left of the right lane 11
when it is safe to do so;12
(ii) On a roadway with only one lane for traffic moving in the 13
direction of travel:14
(A) When there is sufficient room to the left of the individual 15
in the lane for traffic moving in the direction of travel, before 16
passing and until safely clear of the individual:17
(I) Reduce speed to a safe speed for passing relative to the 18
speed of the individual; and19
(II) Pass at a safe distance, where practicable of at least three 20
feet, to clearly avoid coming into contact with the individual or the 21
individual's vehicle or animal; or22
(B) When there is insufficient room to the left of the individual 23
in the lane for traffic moving in the direction of travel to comply 24
with (a)(ii)(A) of this subsection, before passing and until safely 25
clear of the individual, move completely into the lane for traffic 26
moving in the opposite direction when it is safe to do so and in 27
compliance with RCW 46.61.120 and 46.61.125.28
(b) A driver of a motor vehicle found to be in violation of this 29
subsection (2) must be assessed an additional fine equal to the base 30
penalty assessed under RCW 46.63.110(3). This fine may not be waived, 31
reduced, or suspended, unless the court finds the offender to be 32
indigent, and is not subject to the additional fees and assessments 33
that the base penalty for this violation is subject to under RCW 34
2.68.040, 3.62.090, and 46.63.110.35
(c) The additional fine imposed under (b) of this subsection must 36
be deposited into the vulnerable roadway user education account 37
created in RCW 46.61.145.38
(d) For the purposes of this section, "vulnerable user of a 39
public way" has the same meaning as provided in RCW 46.61.5259.40
p. 5 ESB 5595.SLPage 234 of 276
(e) This subsection (2) does not apply on a shared street as 1
defined in section 1 of this act.2
(3) Except when overtaking and passing on the right is permitted, 3
overtaken traffic shall give way to the right in favor of an 4
overtaking vehicle on audible signal and shall not increase speed 5
until completely passed by the overtaking vehicle.6
Sec. 5. RCW 46.61.240 and 2019 c 214 s 13 are each amended to 7
read as follows:8
(1) Every pedestrian or personal delivery device crossing a 9
roadway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or within 10
an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection shall yield the right-of-way 11
to all vehicles upon the roadway.12
(2) Where curb ramps exist at or adjacent to intersections or at 13
marked crosswalks in other locations, persons with disabilities or 14
personal delivery devices may enter the roadway from the curb ramps 15
and cross the roadway within or as closely as practicable to the 16
crosswalk. All other pedestrian rights and duties as defined 17
elsewhere in this chapter remain applicable.18
(3) Any pedestrian crossing a roadway at a point where a 19
pedestrian tunnel or overhead pedestrian crossing has been provided 20
shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the roadway.21
(4) Between adjacent intersections at which traffic-control 22
signals are in operation pedestrians shall not cross at any place 23
except in a marked crosswalk.24
(5) No pedestrian or personal delivery device shall cross a 25
roadway intersection diagonally unless authorized by official 26
traffic-control devices; and, when authorized to cross diagonally, 27
pedestrians and personal delivery devices shall cross only in 28
accordance with the official traffic-control devices pertaining to 29
such crossing movements.30
(6) No pedestrian or personal delivery device shall cross a 31
roadway at an unmarked crosswalk where an official sign prohibits 32
such crossing.33
(7) This section does not apply on a shared street as defined in 34
section 1 of this act.35
Sec. 6. RCW 46.61.770 and 2019 c 403 s 10 are each amended to 36
read as follows:37
p. 6 ESB 5595.SLPage 235 of 276
(1) Every person operating a bicycle upon a roadway at a rate of 1
speed less than the normal flow of traffic at the particular time and 2
place shall ride as near to the right side of the right through lane 3
as is safe except:4
(a) While preparing to make or while making turning movements at 5
an intersection or into a private road or driveway;6
(b) When approaching an intersection where right turns are 7
permitted and there is a dedicated right turn lane, in which case a 8
person may operate a bicycle in this lane even if the operator does 9
not intend to turn right;10
(c) While overtaking and passing another bicycle or vehicle 11
proceeding in the same direction; and12
(d) When reasonably necessary to avoid unsafe conditions 13
including, but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, parked or 14
moving vehicles, bicyclists, pedestrians, animals, and surface 15
hazards.16
(2) A person operating a bicycle upon a roadway or highway other 17
than a limited access highway, which roadway or highway carries 18
traffic in one direction only and has two or more marked traffic 19
lanes, may ride as near to the left side of the left through lane as 20
is safe.21
(3) A person operating a bicycle upon a roadway may use the 22
shoulder of the roadway or any specially designated bicycle lane.23
(4) When the operator of a bicycle is using the travel lane of a 24
roadway with only one lane for traffic moving in the direction of 25
travel and it is wide enough for a bicyclist and a vehicle to travel 26
safely side-by-side within it, the bicycle operator shall operate far 27
enough to the right to facilitate the movement of an overtaking 28
vehicle unless other conditions make it unsafe to do so or unless the 29
bicyclist is preparing to make a turning movement or while making a 30
turning movement.31
(5) Persons riding bicycles upon a roadway shall not ride more 32
than two abreast except on paths or parts of roadways set aside for 33
the exclusive use of bicycles.34
(6) This section does not apply on a shared street as defined in 35
section 1 of this act.36
Passed by the Senate April 17, 2025.
Passed by the House April 11, 2025.
Approved by the Governor May 17, 2025.
p. 7 ESB 5595.SLPage 236 of 276
Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 19, 2025.
--- END ---
p. 8 ESB 5595.SLPage 237 of 276
DRAFT
City of Pasco
City Council Speed Limit Setting Policy
July 2025
Page 238 of 276
Introduction
Speed limits are established to inform motorists of the maximum allowable travel speed for a
roadway under favorable conditions. These posted limits serve as a critical element of traffic
control, providing a consistent basis for enforcement and promoting predictable driver behavior.
The purpose of this policy is to ensure that speed limits within the City of Pasco are applied
consistently, transparently, and in accordance with state law and engineering best practices. By
aligning speed limits with roadway conditions, land use context, and observed traffic patterns, the
City aims to enhance public safety, support efficient mobility, and foster community confldence in
the transportation system.
Legal Authority
The City of Pasco sets and modifles speed limits under the authority granted by the State of
Washington. These laws provide the statutory and regulatory foundation for speed limit setting
within the City of Pasco. All speed limit decisions must comply with these provisions to ensure they
are enforceable, promote public safety, and withstand legal scrutiny.
The following Revised Code of Washington (RCW) and Washington Administrative Code (WAC)
sections provide the legal foundation for establishing, modifying, and enforcing speed limits on
public roadways:
Revised Code of Washington (RCW)
• RCW 46.61.400 – Basic Rule and Maximum Limits
Establishes the general speed limits across the state:
o 25 mph on city and town streets
o 50 mph on county roads
o 60 mph on state highways
Speed limits must be appropriate for roadway conditions and may not exceed these
limits unless otherwise authorized.
o The maximum speed limits set forth in this section may be altered as authorized in
RCW 46.61.405, 46.61.410, and 46.61.415.
• RCW 46.61.415 – When Local Authorities May Alter Maximum Limits
Authorizes local governments to increase or decrease speed limits on city streets based on
an engineering and traffic investigation. The statute requires consistency with safe and
efficient traffic operations. This section makes a distinction between nonarterial roadways
and all others.
• RCW 46.61.440 – Speed Limits in School or Playground Crosswalks
Allows local jurisdictions to reduce speed limits to 20 mph in school or playground zones,
with speciflc requirements for signage and enforcement times.
Page 239 of 276
Washington Administrative Code (WAC)
• WAC 468-95-045 – Speed Limits
Part of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) as adopted in Washington.
This section provides guidance on:
o Setting speed limits in 5 mph increments
o Using engineering judgment and studies
o Ensuring consistency in signing and visibility
There is an exception to performing an engineering and traffic investigation. As provided for in RCW
46.61.415 above, Council may establish a 20 MPH speed limit on a nonarterial street or portion
thereof without an engineering and traffic investigation if a procedure has been created. This
document serves to establish this procedure.
Citywide Safety Goals
This policy incorporates citywide safety goals by reference as established in the Transportation
System Master Plan, Local Road Safety Plan, and Comprehensive Safety Action Plan as amended
and developed.
Context and Driver Behavior
In addition to regulatory speed limits described above, drivers are expected to reduce speeds
further from the posted speed limit under certain conditions (e.g. poor visibility, adverse weather,
congestion, warning signs). Advisory signage may be used in particular areas to alert drivers to
speciflc roadway conditions and provide additional guidance for the appropriate travel speed on a
roadway in a given location. While advisory speed limits do not carry the same force of law as
posted regulatory speed limits, motorists can be cited under the basic speed rule as driving too fast
for the prevailing conditions.
The character or “feel” of a roadway can also infiuence travel speeds. Median islands, landscaped
boulevards or urban design treatments, and varying roadside development are but a few examples
of roadway features that can infiuence prevailing travel speeds. This is largely because drivers tend
to select operating speeds based on the visual scene presented to them; therefore, the speed limit
and design of the road must work in concert if desired operating speeds are to be achieved. Special
situations also may exist which include school zones, work zones, and variable speed zones or
other advisory speed conditions.
Understanding the above, the following factors will be considered when establishing or adjusting
speed limits to ensure they are appropriate for the speciflc context:
• Adjacent land uses (residential, commercial, institutional)
• Presence of schools, parks, and playgrounds
• Pedestrian and bicycle activity levels and proximity to the travel lane(s)
Page 240 of 276
• Roadway geometry, sight distances, and traffic control devices
• Historical crash data and safety concerns
Framework
The application of this speed limit policy is grounded in the principles of safety, consistency, and
evidence-based decision making. It establishes a clear framework for how speed limits are
evaluated, recommended, and enacted within the City of Pasco.
Roles and Responsibilities
• City Council
The City Council serves as the legislative body with flnal authority to establish or amend
speed limits by ordinance. Council decisions will be informed by the flndings and
recommendations presented by the Public Works Department and may consider additional
input from residents, stakeholders, and other public agencies.
• Public Works Department
The Public Works Department is responsible for initiating and conducting evaluations of
existing or proposed speed limits. This includes reviewing roadway conditions, traffic
volumes, crash histories, surrounding land uses, and input from the Police and Fire
Departments. The department prepares recommendations based on engineering judgment
and best practices, including the guidance set forth in national standards such as the
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
Public Involvement
Community engagement is a vital component of the speed limit setting process. Input from
residents, businesses, neighborhood groups, and advocacy organizations will be considered when
speed limits are under review. The City will strive to ensure that speed limit decisions support
equitable outcomes across all neighborhoods including considerations for all users.
Engineering and Traffic Evaluation
Speed limits will be established or modifled based on an engineering and traffic investigation that
considers a variety of factors, including but not limited to:
• Land Use Context (roadside development, density, adjacent land use, zoning, on-street
parking)
• Geometric Features (roadway curvature, grade, shoulder width, pavement width, lane
widths, sight distance)
• Driveway Access Density
• Roadway Functional Classiflcation
Page 241 of 276
• Crash History
• Active Transportation Use (number of users, types of users e.g. children, seniors, mobility
impaired, etc., proximity to ped/bike generators such as trails, schools, parks, transit)
• Active Transportation Facilities (existing and whether the city is planning for facilities in the
future based on the Transportation Master Plan)
• Vehicle Speed Characteristics (50th and 85th percentile)
• Traffic Volumes
The following items are not required but may support a more comprehensive review:
• Enforcement and Traffic Citation History
• History of Past Speed Studies or Speed Limit Changes on the Roadway
• Public Testimony
The above data items are consistent with criteria listed in the updated MUTCD and are supportive of
data listed in NACTO City Limits. The engineering and traffic evaluation is based on these factors
and will be considered in determining a recommended speed limit. This evaluation ensures that
speed limits refiect the actual operating environment and support safe travel for all users..
Roadway Design
Since posted limits alone may not infiuence driver behavior, potential roadway design treatments
such as lane narrowing, medians, pedestrian refuge islands, or traffic calming will be considered as
part of the evaluation.
Procedure
The City of Pasco utilizes a context-sensitive approach to setting speed limits that refiects the
diverse characteristics and functions of its roadways. This framework provides general guidance for
establishing speed limits aligned with roadway classiflcation and surrounding land use.
Roadway Categories
Speed limits will be established according to the functional classiflcation of roadways, which
considers their role in the transportation network:
Arterial Roads
The procedures for determining the appropriate speed limit on an arterial should include a robust
collection of data for the subject roadway segment. Engineering and Traffic Investigations may
include a speed study conducted consistent with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD) that provides guidance on the collection and analysis of data.
The following procedures should be followed in setting regulatory speed limits:
Page 242 of 276
1. Observe vehicle operating speeds and conduct speed study data collection for subject
segments under free fiow traffic conditions. Determine 85th percentile speed and 50th
percentile speed for the study segment.
2. Collect all other data.
3. Determine the “suggested speed limit” based on data inputs shown in the Engineering and
Traffic Evaluation section above.
4. Consider how the suggested speed limit impacts non-vehicular uses of or near the right of
way.
5. If the “suggested speed limit” does not match the desired speed limit based on the
engineer’s evaluation of the corridor, consider other interventions, as needed, to encourage
lower driving speeds in conjunction with the speed limit reduction.
6. Collaborate with City Police Department in the formulation of flndings for an appropriate
speed limit. Consider the department’s opinions on the ability to feasibly enforcement
regulatory speed limit on this segment.
7. Document the flndings of the Engineering and Traffic Investigation in a written report. This
evaluation should include a thorough description of any recommended speed limit.
8. Where modiflcations from the current Speed Limit Ordinance in effect are justifled (either to
raise or lower a posted regulatory speed), prepare proposed modiflcations to said
ordinance and seek City Council approval based on the flndings of the Engineering and
Traffic Investigation.
Local Residential Streets
Pursuant to RCW 46.61.415, the City of Pasco City Council has the authority to establish a
maximum speed limit of twenty miles per hour on a nonarterial highway without an engineering
study, so long as there are procedures that dictate where this may occur. When one or more local
streets is considered for a 20 MPH speed limit, the following procedures shall be followed:
1. Identify the boundaries of the street or neighborhood that will receive the new
maximum speed limit and assure all boundaries from arterials can be clearly deflned
with a new posted speed limit.
2. Conflrm that streets within the boundary will receive the new maximum speed limit.
Determine if there are any streets that are classifled "Local” but operate at a higher use
class and should maintain a higher speed limit.
3. Notify residents within the boundaries of the anticipated speed limit change.
4. Complete the speed limit ordinance process to formally change the speed to 20 MPH.
5. Change the signage and markings in the fleld as needed.
Page 243 of 276
6. Collect “before” speed and volume data before the speed limit change is approved and
changed in the fleld.
7. Collect “after” data a minimum of three months after the speed limit is changed.
8. If within 12 months of the decision to set the maximum speed limit to 20MPH the City
Council determines that the change has not been effective, they may by a majority vote
restore the previous speed limit without an Engineering and Traffic Investigation.
Implementation Consistency
Speed limits will be set in accordance with state laws and guidelines, including compliance with
the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Limits will be posted clearly and
consistently to promote understanding and compliance among motorists.
Review and Adjustment
To maintain an effective and responsive speed limit system, the City of Pasco commits to regularly
reviewing posted speed limits and making adjustments as necessary based on evolving conditions
and new data.
Periodic Review
Speed limits will be reviewed at least every three to flve years or sooner if warranted by changes in
roadway characteristics, land use, or traffic patterns. This routine evaluation ensures that speed
limits remain appropriate and continue to support safety and mobility objectives.
Criteria for Re-Evaluation
In addition to scheduled reviews, speed limits may be re-evaluated in response to:
• Signiflcant increases in crash frequency or severity
• Community requests or concerns regarding safety or traffic speeds
• Changes in roadway design, such as new development or traffic control measures
• Updated traffic or engineering studies indicating a need for modiflcation
Documentation and Accountability
All reviews and subsequent adjustments will be documented thoroughly, including the data
analyzed, flndings, and rationale for any changes. Documentation will be maintained by the Public
Works Department in accordance with the RCW 42.56 as amended and made available to
stakeholders upon request to ensure transparency and accountability.
Page 244 of 276
Appendix
Definitions
85th Percentile Speed – The speed at or below which 85 percent of free-fiow motor vehicle traffic is
moving.
50th Percentile Speed – The speed at or below which 50 percent of free-fiow motor vehicle traffic is
moving.
Arterial Road – Arterial roadways serve a large percentage of travel between activity centers,
especially when minimizing travel time and distance is important. For this reason, Arterials typically
are roadways with high traffic volumes and are frequently the route of choice for buses and trucks.
Engineering and Traffic Investigation – the assessment of conditions by a professional engineer
licensed in the fleld of transportation and/or the assessment of conditions by a designee working
under the direct supervision of a professional engineer licensed in the fleld of transportation with
the purpose of determining flndings that may inform further study, action, or recommended plan
associated with a transportation related issue. The assessment may be qualitative based or
quantifled based on data, facts, or other pertinent information. Engineering and Traffic
Investigations need not result in written documentation of the assessment and/or flndings.
Engineering and Traffic Investigations may however lead to a written report at the discretion of the
Engineer, if resources allow and found necessary.
Speed Study – A summary report of the collected fleld data which refiects the speed at which
vehicles are passing a particular location. The speed study shall include at a minimum the
summary determination of the 85th percentile speed and 50th percentile speed for free fiowing
traffic by direction and may include other speed indicators such as mean or average speed. Where
practical, infiuences from close proximity to traffic signals should be avoided and the general
application of speed studies should be consistent with the guidance contained in the MUTCD.
Legal Reference
RCW 46.61.400
Basic rule and maximum limits.
(1) No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent
under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. In every
event speed shall be so controlled as may be necessary to avoid colliding with any person, vehicle
or other conveyance on or entering the highway in compliance with legal requirements and the duty
of all persons to use due care.
(2) Except when a special hazard exists that requires lower speed for compliance with subsection
(1) of this section, the limits specifled in this section or established as hereinafter authorized shall
Page 245 of 276
be maximum lawful speeds, and no person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed in excess
of such maximum limits.
(a) Twenty-flve miles per hour on city and town streets;
(b) Fifty miles per hour on county roads;
(c) Sixty miles per hour on state highways.
The maximum speed limits set forth in this section may be altered as authorized in
RCW 46.61.405, 46.61.410, and 46.61.415.
(3) The driver of every vehicle shall, consistent with the requirements of subsection (1) of this
section, drive at an appropriate reduced speed when approaching and crossing an intersection or
railway grade crossing, when approaching and going around a curve, when approaching a hill crest,
when traveling upon any narrow or winding roadway, and when special hazard exists with respect to
pedestrians or other traffic or by reason of weather or highway conditions.
RCW 46.61.415
When local authorities may establish or alter maximum limits.
*** CHANGE IN 2025 *** (SEE 5595.SL, attached) ***
(1) Whenever local authorities in their respective jurisdictions determine on the basis of an
engineering and traffic investigation that the maximum speed permitted under
RCW 46.61.400 or 46.61.440 is greater or less than is reasonable and safe under the conditions
found to exist upon a highway or part of a highway, the local authority may determine and declare a
reasonable and safe maximum limit thereon which
(a) Decreases the limit at intersections; or
(b) Increases the limit but not to more than 60 miles per hour; or
(c) Decreases the limit but not to less than 20 miles per hour.
(2) Local authorities in their respective jurisdictions shall determine by an engineering and traffic
investigation the proper maximum speed for all arterial streets and shall declare a reasonable and
safe maximum limit thereon which may be greater or less than the maximum speed permitted
under RCW 46.61.400(2) but shall not exceed 60 miles per hour.
(3)(a) Local authorities in their respective jurisdictions may establish a maximum speed limit of 20
miles per hour on a nonarterial highway or part of a nonarterial highway.
(b) A speed limit established under this subsection by a local authority does not need to be
determined on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation if the local authority has
developed procedures regarding establishing a maximum speed limit under this subsection. Any
speed limit established under this subsection may be canceled within one year of its
establishment, and the previous speed limit reestablished, without an engineering and traffic
Page 246 of 276
investigation. This subsection does not otherwise affect the requirement that local authorities
conduct an engineering and traffic investigation to determine whether to increase speed limits.
(c) When establishing speed limits under this subsection, local authorities shall consult the manual
on uniform traffic control devices as adopted by the Washington state department of
transportation.
(4) The secretary of transportation is authorized to establish speed limits on county roads and city
and town streets as shall be necessary to conform with any federal requirements which are a
prescribed condition for the allocation of federal funds to the state.
(5) Any altered limit established as hereinbefore authorized shall be effective when appropriate
signs giving notice thereof are erected. Such maximum speed limit may be declared to be effective
at all times or at such times as are indicated upon such signs; and differing limits may be
established for different times of day, different types of vehicles, varying weather conditions, and
other factors bearing on safe speeds, which shall be effective when posted upon appropriate flxed
or variable signs.
(6) Any alteration of maximum limits on state highways within incorporated cities or towns by local
authorities shall not be effective until such alteration has been approved by the secretary of
transportation.
WAC 468-95-045
Speed limit sign (R2-1).
Revise MUTCD Section 2B.13 to read:
Standard:
Speed Limits (R2-1) signs (see Figure 2B-1) shall display the speed limit established by statute;
or, by an ordinance or regulation adopted by the authorized agency, based on the engineering
study or traffic investigation required by RCW 46.61.405, 46.61.410, and 46.61.415. The speed
limit shall be set in multiples of - 5 mph.
Guidance:
Authorized agencies should reevaluate speed limits on segments of their roadways that have
undergone a signiflcant change in roadway characteristics or surrounding land use since the last
review.
No more than three speed limits should be posted on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly.
When evaluating speed limits, the following factors should be considered:
• The 85th percentile speed of vehicles traveling on the road;
• Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance;
• The pace speed;
Page 247 of 276
• Roadside development and environment;
• Parking practices and pedestrian activity;
• Reported crash experience for at least a 12 month period; and
• Other factors such as route development or comprehensive plans.
Option:
Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: One to designate passenger car speeds, including any
nighttime information or minimum speed that may apply; and, the other to show any special speed
limits for trucks and other vehicles.
A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be
installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is shown at the proper times.
A changeable message sign that displays to drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be
installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.
Guidance:
If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend your speed
xx (mph) or such similar legend should be shown. The color of the changeable message legend
should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.
Support:
Advisory Speed signs are discussed in Sections 2C.08, 2C.14, and 2C.15. Temporary Traffic Control
Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 47.36.030. WSR 11-23-101, § 468-95-045, flled 11/18/11, effective
12/19/11. Statutory Authority: Chapter 34.05 RCW and RCW 46.36.030 [RCW 47.36.030]. WSR 05-
23-003, § 468-95-045, flled 11/3/05, effective 12/4/05.]
Functional Classiflcation Map
Hosted by WSDOT here: https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/data/tools/geoportal/?conflg=functionalclass
Found in the Pasco Transportation System Master Plan: https://www.pasco -
wa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/64056/Pasco -TSMP-Entire-Plan---June-2022-Final_r?bidId=
Page 248 of 276
CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT
ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5595
Chapter 300, Laws of 2025
69th Legislature
2025 Regular Session
SHARED STREETS
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 27, 2025
Passed by the Senate April 17, 2025
Yeas 31 Nays 18
JOHN LOVICK
President of the Senate
Passed by the House April 11, 2025
Yeas 64 Nays 32
LAURIE JINKINS
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
CERTIFICATE
I, Sarah Bannister, Secretary of
the Senate of the State of
Washington, do hereby certify that
the attached is ENGROSSED SENATE
BILL 5595 as passed by the Senate
and the House of Representatives on
the dates hereon set forth.
SARAH BANNISTER
Secretary
Approved May 17, 2025 11:21 AM FILED
May 19, 2025
BOB FERGUSON
Governor of the State of Washington
Secretary of State
State of Washington
Page 249 of 276
AN ACT Relating to establishing shared streets; amending RCW 1
46.61.250, 46.61.415, 46.61.110, 46.61.240, and 46.61.770; and adding 2
a new section to chapter 46.61 RCW.3
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:4
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 46.61 5
RCW to read as follows:6
(1)(a) A local authority may designate a nonarterial highway, 7
except as provided in (b) of this subsection, to be a shared street 8
under this section, if the local authority has developed procedures 9
for establishing shared streets.10
(b) Nonarterial highways that are state highways may not be 11
designated shared streets unless they are the primary roads through a 12
central business district.13
(2) Vehicular traffic traveling along a shared street shall yield 14
the right-of-way to any pedestrian, bicyclist, or operator of a 15
micromobility device on the shared street.16
(3) A bicyclist or operator of a micromobility device shall yield 17
the right-of-way to any pedestrian on a shared street.18
(4) Any local authority that designates a nonarterial highway to 19
be a shared street as provided by this section must post an annual 20
report on the local authority's website of the number of traffic 21
ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5595
AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE
Passed Legislature - 2025 Regular Session
State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session
By Senators Alvarado, Liias, Frame, Nobles, Pedersen, Saldaña, and
Shewmake
Read first time 01/30/25. Referred to Committee on Transportation.
p. 1 ESB 5595.SLPage 250 of 276
accidents, including those that involve a pedestrian, bicyclist, or 1
operator of a micromobility device, that occurred on the designated 2
shared street. The report must also include the number of speeding 3
violations and driving under the influence violations that occurred 4
on the designated shared street.5
(5) For purposes of this section:6
(a) "Micromobility device" means personal or shared nonmotorized 7
scooters, "motorized foot scooters" as defined in RCW 46.04.336, and 8
"electric personal assistive mobility devices" (EPAMD) as defined in 9
RCW 46.04.1695; and10
(b) "Shared street" means a city street designated by placement 11
of official traffic control devices where pedestrians, bicyclists, 12
and vehicular traffic share a portion or all of the same street.13
Sec. 2. RCW 46.61.250 and 2022 c 235 s 3 are each amended to 14
read as follows:15
(1) Where sidewalks are provided and are accessible, it is 16
unlawful for any pedestrian to walk or otherwise move along and upon 17
an adjacent roadway. Where sidewalks are provided but wheelchair 18
access is not available, persons with disabilities who require such 19
access may walk or otherwise move along and upon an adjacent roadway 20
until they reach an access point in the sidewalk.21
(2) Where sidewalks are not provided or are inaccessible, a 22
pedestrian walking or otherwise moving along and upon a highway, and 23
any personal delivery device moving along and upon a highway, shall:24
(a) When shoulders are provided and are accessible, walk or move 25
on the shoulder of the roadway as far as is practicable from the edge 26
of the roadway, facing traffic when a shoulder is available in this 27
direction; or28
(b) When shoulders are not provided or are inaccessible, walk or 29
move as near as is practicable to the outside edge of the roadway 30
facing traffic, and when practicable, move clear of the roadway upon 31
meeting an oncoming vehicle.32
(3) A pedestrian traveling to the nearest emergency reporting 33
device on a one-way roadway of a controlled access highway is not 34
required to travel facing traffic as otherwise required by subsection 35
(2) of this section.36
(4) When walking or otherwise moving along and upon an adjacent 37
roadway, a pedestrian shall exercise due care to avoid colliding with 38
any vehicle upon the roadway.39
p. 2 ESB 5595.SLPage 251 of 276
(5) Subsections (1) and (2) of this section do not apply when the 1
roadway is duly closed to vehicular traffic by placement of official 2
traffic control devices for the sole purposes of pedestrian and 3
bicyclist use of the roadway.4
(6) Subsections (1), (2), and (4) of this section do not apply on 5
a shared street as defined in section 1 of this act.6
Sec. 3. RCW 46.61.415 and 2022 c 235 s 1 are each amended to 7
read as follows:8
(1) Whenever local authorities in their respective jurisdictions 9
determine on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation 10
that the maximum speed permitted under RCW 46.61.400 or 46.61.440 is 11
greater or less than is reasonable and safe under the conditions 12
found to exist upon a highway or part of a highway, the local 13
authority may determine and declare a reasonable and safe maximum 14
limit thereon which15
(a) Decreases the limit at intersections; or16
(b) Increases the limit but not to more than 60 miles per hour; 17
or18
(c) Decreases the limit but not to less than 20 miles per hour.19
(2) Local authorities in their respective jurisdictions shall 20
determine by an engineering and traffic investigation the proper 21
maximum speed for all arterial streets and shall declare a reasonable 22
and safe maximum limit thereon, which may be greater or less than the 23
maximum speed permitted under RCW 46.61.400(2) but shall not exceed 24
60 miles per hour.25
(3)(a) Local authorities in their respective jurisdictions may 26
establish a maximum speed limit of 20 miles per hour on a nonarterial 27
highway or part of a nonarterial highway or a maximum speed limit of 28
10 miles per hour on a shared street as defined in section 1 of this 29
act.30
(b) A speed limit established under this subsection by a local 31
authority does not need to be determined on the basis of an 32
engineering and traffic investigation if the local authority has 33
developed procedures regarding establishing a maximum speed limit 34
under this subsection. Any speed limit established under this 35
subsection may be canceled within one year of its establishment, and 36
the previous speed limit reestablished, without an engineering and 37
traffic investigation. This subsection does not otherwise affect the 38
p. 3 ESB 5595.SLPage 252 of 276
requirement that local authorities conduct an engineering and traffic 1
investigation to determine whether to increase speed limits.2
(c) When establishing speed limits under this subsection, local 3
authorities shall consult the manual on uniform traffic control 4
devices as adopted by the Washington state department of 5
transportation.6
(4) The secretary of transportation is authorized to establish 7
speed limits on county roads and city and town streets as shall be 8
necessary to conform with any federal requirements, which are a 9
prescribed condition for the allocation of federal funds to the 10
state.11
(5) Any altered limit established as hereinbefore authorized 12
shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are 13
erected. Such maximum speed limit may be declared to be effective at 14
all times or at such times as are indicated upon such signs; and 15
differing limits may be established for different times of day, 16
different types of vehicles, varying weather conditions, and other 17
factors bearing on safe speeds, which shall be effective when posted 18
upon appropriate fixed or variable signs.19
(6) Any alteration of maximum limits on state highways within 20
incorporated cities or towns by local authorities shall not be 21
effective until such alteration has been approved by the secretary of 22
transportation.23
Sec. 4. RCW 46.61.110 and 2023 c 471 s 4 are each amended to 24
read as follows:25
The following rules shall govern the overtaking and passing of 26
vehicles proceeding in the same direction:27
(1)(a) The driver of a vehicle overtaking other traffic 28
proceeding in the same direction shall pass to the left of it at a 29
safe distance and shall not again drive to the right side of the 30
roadway until safely clear of the overtaken traffic.31
(b)(i) When the vehicle being overtaken is a motorcycle, motor-32
driven cycle, or moped, a driver of a motor vehicle found to be in 33
violation of (a) of this subsection must be assessed an additional 34
fine equal to the base penalty assessed under RCW 46.63.110(3). This 35
fine may not be waived, reduced, or suspended, unless the court finds 36
the offender to be indigent, and is not subject to the additional 37
fees and assessments that the base penalty for this violation is 38
subject to under RCW 2.68.040, 3.62.090, and 46.63.110.39
p. 4 ESB 5595.SLPage 253 of 276
(ii) The additional fine imposed under (b)(i) of this subsection 1
must be deposited into the vulnerable roadway user education account 2
created in RCW 46.61.145.3
(2)(a) The driver of a vehicle approaching an individual who is 4
traveling as a pedestrian or on a bicycle, riding an animal, or using 5
a farm tractor or implement of husbandry without an enclosed shell, 6
and who is traveling in the right lane of a roadway or on the right-7
hand shoulder or bicycle lane of the roadway, shall:8
(i) On a roadway with two lanes or more for traffic moving in the 9
direction of travel, before passing and until safely clear of the 10
individual, move completely into a lane to the left of the right lane 11
when it is safe to do so;12
(ii) On a roadway with only one lane for traffic moving in the 13
direction of travel:14
(A) When there is sufficient room to the left of the individual 15
in the lane for traffic moving in the direction of travel, before 16
passing and until safely clear of the individual:17
(I) Reduce speed to a safe speed for passing relative to the 18
speed of the individual; and19
(II) Pass at a safe distance, where practicable of at least three 20
feet, to clearly avoid coming into contact with the individual or the 21
individual's vehicle or animal; or22
(B) When there is insufficient room to the left of the individual 23
in the lane for traffic moving in the direction of travel to comply 24
with (a)(ii)(A) of this subsection, before passing and until safely 25
clear of the individual, move completely into the lane for traffic 26
moving in the opposite direction when it is safe to do so and in 27
compliance with RCW 46.61.120 and 46.61.125.28
(b) A driver of a motor vehicle found to be in violation of this 29
subsection (2) must be assessed an additional fine equal to the base 30
penalty assessed under RCW 46.63.110(3). This fine may not be waived, 31
reduced, or suspended, unless the court finds the offender to be 32
indigent, and is not subject to the additional fees and assessments 33
that the base penalty for this violation is subject to under RCW 34
2.68.040, 3.62.090, and 46.63.110.35
(c) The additional fine imposed under (b) of this subsection must 36
be deposited into the vulnerable roadway user education account 37
created in RCW 46.61.145.38
(d) For the purposes of this section, "vulnerable user of a 39
public way" has the same meaning as provided in RCW 46.61.5259.40
p. 5 ESB 5595.SLPage 254 of 276
(e) This subsection (2) does not apply on a shared street as 1
defined in section 1 of this act.2
(3) Except when overtaking and passing on the right is permitted, 3
overtaken traffic shall give way to the right in favor of an 4
overtaking vehicle on audible signal and shall not increase speed 5
until completely passed by the overtaking vehicle.6
Sec. 5. RCW 46.61.240 and 2019 c 214 s 13 are each amended to 7
read as follows:8
(1) Every pedestrian or personal delivery device crossing a 9
roadway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or within 10
an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection shall yield the right-of-way 11
to all vehicles upon the roadway.12
(2) Where curb ramps exist at or adjacent to intersections or at 13
marked crosswalks in other locations, persons with disabilities or 14
personal delivery devices may enter the roadway from the curb ramps 15
and cross the roadway within or as closely as practicable to the 16
crosswalk. All other pedestrian rights and duties as defined 17
elsewhere in this chapter remain applicable.18
(3) Any pedestrian crossing a roadway at a point where a 19
pedestrian tunnel or overhead pedestrian crossing has been provided 20
shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the roadway.21
(4) Between adjacent intersections at which traffic-control 22
signals are in operation pedestrians shall not cross at any place 23
except in a marked crosswalk.24
(5) No pedestrian or personal delivery device shall cross a 25
roadway intersection diagonally unless authorized by official 26
traffic-control devices; and, when authorized to cross diagonally, 27
pedestrians and personal delivery devices shall cross only in 28
accordance with the official traffic-control devices pertaining to 29
such crossing movements.30
(6) No pedestrian or personal delivery device shall cross a 31
roadway at an unmarked crosswalk where an official sign prohibits 32
such crossing.33
(7) This section does not apply on a shared street as defined in 34
section 1 of this act.35
Sec. 6. RCW 46.61.770 and 2019 c 403 s 10 are each amended to 36
read as follows:37
p. 6 ESB 5595.SLPage 255 of 276
(1) Every person operating a bicycle upon a roadway at a rate of 1
speed less than the normal flow of traffic at the particular time and 2
place shall ride as near to the right side of the right through lane 3
as is safe except:4
(a) While preparing to make or while making turning movements at 5
an intersection or into a private road or driveway;6
(b) When approaching an intersection where right turns are 7
permitted and there is a dedicated right turn lane, in which case a 8
person may operate a bicycle in this lane even if the operator does 9
not intend to turn right;10
(c) While overtaking and passing another bicycle or vehicle 11
proceeding in the same direction; and12
(d) When reasonably necessary to avoid unsafe conditions 13
including, but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, parked or 14
moving vehicles, bicyclists, pedestrians, animals, and surface 15
hazards.16
(2) A person operating a bicycle upon a roadway or highway other 17
than a limited access highway, which roadway or highway carries 18
traffic in one direction only and has two or more marked traffic 19
lanes, may ride as near to the left side of the left through lane as 20
is safe.21
(3) A person operating a bicycle upon a roadway may use the 22
shoulder of the roadway or any specially designated bicycle lane.23
(4) When the operator of a bicycle is using the travel lane of a 24
roadway with only one lane for traffic moving in the direction of 25
travel and it is wide enough for a bicyclist and a vehicle to travel 26
safely side-by-side within it, the bicycle operator shall operate far 27
enough to the right to facilitate the movement of an overtaking 28
vehicle unless other conditions make it unsafe to do so or unless the 29
bicyclist is preparing to make a turning movement or while making a 30
turning movement.31
(5) Persons riding bicycles upon a roadway shall not ride more 32
than two abreast except on paths or parts of roadways set aside for 33
the exclusive use of bicycles.34
(6) This section does not apply on a shared street as defined in 35
section 1 of this act.36
Passed by the Senate April 17, 2025.
Passed by the House April 11, 2025.
Approved by the Governor May 17, 2025.
p. 7 ESB 5595.SLPage 256 of 276
Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 19, 2025.
--- END ---
p. 8 ESB 5595.SLPage 257 of 276
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 13, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 8/18/25
FROM: Maria Serra, Public Works Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4641 - Adopting a Commitment Goal to Reduce Fatal
and Serious Injuries on City Roads by 50% by 2040 (5 minute staff
presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution
Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION A: I move to approve Resolution No. 4641, adopting a commitment
goal to reduce fatal and serious injuries on City roads by 50% by 2040.
-or-
MOTION B: I move to approve Resolution No. 4641, adopting a commitment
goal to reduce fatal and serious injuries on City roads by 50% by 2035.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
In 2023, the City of Pasco secured funding from the U.S. Department of
Transportation's Grant All for Roads (SS4A) Streets Safe and (USDOT)
Program to develop its Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP). This CSAP
will be a data- and research-driven, context-sensitive plan, tailored to Pasco's
unique needs and aligned with the USDOT Safe System Approach. Its purpose
is recommend data, through suitable problem identify to areas
countermeasures, and prioritize safety improvements that benefit all users,
ultimately strong aiming to reduce crash frequency and severity, with a
emphasis on lowering fatalities and serious injuries.
Page 258 of 276
The SS4A program requires the City to commit to a goal and timeline for
eliminating roadway fatalities and serious injuries, setting a target date for
either full elimination or a significant percentage reduction in crashes.
As required by the SS4A program, City staff established a Transportation
Advisory Committee (TAC) to oversee CSAP development and participate in its
creation. The TAC comprises six members: Andrey Avetisyan (Engineering
Manager), Faigda Garcia (Engineer I/Project Manager), Kevin Crowley (Fire
Chief), Michael Andrews (Police Traffic Sergeant), Matthew Decker (Police
Lieutenant), and Mark Trumpy (PW Street Lead Maintenance).
During the first meeting of the TAC, members discussed criteria for the target
goal and date for reducing fatal and serious injuries, and reviewed engagement
strategies to promote the CSAP. Attendees agreed to present a goal of
reducing roadway fatalities and serious injuries by 50% by the year 2040 to the
City Council as an option to the full reduction that the SS4A ultimately targets.
The target year of 2040 aligns with the adopted Transportation System Master
Plan (TSMP).
V. DISCUSSION:
The Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) aims to reduce fatal and
serious injuries on city roadways through engineering improvements and
countermeasures. To remain eligible for additional Safe Streets for All (SS4A)
grant funding, the City of Pasco must commit to an eventual goal of zero
roadway fatalities and serious injuries.
At the August 11, 2025, Workshop, Council discussed proceeding with a target
year of 2040; however, there were few differing views amongst Council. The
resolution reflects staff understanding of the majority of Council on selecting a
reduction goal. Staff recommends that the City Council select and approve a
commitment goal to reduce the number of fatal and serious injuries by 50%.
Page 259 of 276
Resolution - Approving a Commitment Goal to Reduce Fatal and Serious Injuries on City Roads - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
ADOPTING A COMMITMENT GOAL TO REDUCE FATAL AND SERIOUS
INJURIES ON CITY ROADS BY 50% BY 2040.
WHEREAS, in 2024, the City of Pasco secured federal funding from the U.S. Department
of Transportation’s Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Program to help develop a
Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP); and
WHEREAS, the CSAP aims to reduce fatal and serious injuries on city roadways through
engineering improvements and countermeasures; and
WHEREAS, to be eligible to apply for SS4A grant funds, cities must have a governing
body committed to the eventual goal of zero roadway fatalities and serious injuries; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco is committed to reducing fatal and serious injuries by 50%
by the year 2040.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco is committed to the eventual goal of zero
roadway fatalities and serious injuries.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the
commitment goal to reduce the number of fatal and serious injuries by 50% by the year 2040.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager is authorized to take all necessary actions
to implement this goal.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of August,
2025.
_____________________________
David Milne
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 260 of 276
Resolution - Approving a Commitment Goal to Reduce Fatal and Serious Injuries on City Roads - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
ADOPTING A COMMITMENT GOAL TO REDUCE FATAL AND SERIOUS
INJURIES ON CITY ROADS BY 50% BY 2035.
WHEREAS, in 2024, the City of Pasco secured federal funding from the U.S. Department
of Transportation’s Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Program to help develop a
Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP); and
WHEREAS, the CSAP aims to reduce fatal and serious injuries on city roadways through
engineering improvements and countermeasures; and
WHEREAS, to be eligible to apply for SS4A grant funds, cities must have a governing
body committed to the eventual goal of zero roadway fatalities and serious injuries; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco is committed to reducing fatal and serious injuries by 50%
by the year 2035.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco is committed to the eventual goal of zero
roadway fatalities and serious injuries.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the
commitment goal to reduce the number of fatal and serious injuries by 50% by the year 2035.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager is authorized to take all necessary actions
to implement this goal.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of August,
2025.
_____________________________
David Milne
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 261 of 276
Pasco City Council
August 18, 2025
Regular Meeting
Pa
g
e
2
6
2
o
f
2
7
6
Comprehensive Safety
Action Plan (CSAP)
Commitment Goal
August 18, 2025
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
2
6
3
o
f
2
7
6
Text Here
Crash Data
Pa
g
e
2
6
4
o
f
2
7
6
Map of Fatal and Serious Injuries (FSI)
2020-2024
Study corridors include
city-maintained streets.
Not including Highway
12, 182 and 395.
Pa
g
e
2
6
5
o
f
2
7
6
What is a Comprehensive Safety Action Plan
(CSAP)?
●A plan to enhance public safety across all
modes of transportation.
●Investigates risk factors, performs a safety
analysis, implements strategies and proposes
data-driven infrastructure improvements.
Pa
g
e
2
6
6
o
f
2
7
6
Pasco’s Comprehensive Safety Action Plan
City of Pasco received $320,000 in
planning funding to develop a
Comprehensive Safety Action Plan,
with a key goal being to secure an
implementation grant for initiating
projects.
CSAP Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) Members:
Police Dept: Matthew Decker,
Michael Andrews
Fire Dept: Kevin Crowley
Street Lead Maintenance: Mark Trumpy
Public Works: Andrey Avetisyan,
Faigda Garcia
Pa
g
e
2
6
7
o
f
2
7
6
8.4: Present the
proposed Fatal &
Serious Injury
Commitment Goal
CSAP TAC
Meeting #2
8.18: Sign the
Resolution
July
2025
August
2025
Fall
2025
Winter
2025
Spring
2026
Engagement: TAC Meetings, Social Pinpoint Website, Public Open Houses, Pop-ups
Visit: www.pasco-wa.gov/csap
Brainstorm the
Fatal & Serious
Injury Commitment
Goal
CSAP TAC
Meeting #1
Conduct Data
Analysis
Brainstorm
Potential Safety
Projects
Draft Comprehensive
Safety Action Plan
Complete Engagement
Finalize
Comprehensive
Safety Action Plan
CSAP Timeline
Pa
g
e
2
6
8
o
f
2
7
6
Engagement: TAC Meetings, Social Pinpoint Website, Public Open Houses, Pop-ups
Visit: www.pasco-wa.gov/csap
60+ Comments received
on Comment Map
15+
Surveys Completed
3 In-person events
2 Virtual workshops
So Far…
Pa
g
e
2
6
9
o
f
2
7
6
FSI Commitment Goal Examples
Examples of Commitment Goals and Target Dates in Washington
Agency Reduced Fatal and Serious Injury (FSI) Goal and Target Date
Washington Target Zero Reduce FSI to zero by 2030
Richland Richland City Council passed a resolution endorsing Vision Zero,
setting a target date for achieving zero roadway fatalities and
serious injuries on Richland streets by 2035.
Redmond
(population ~68,000)
Commitment to a 50% reduction of fatal and serious injury
crashes by the end of year 2030.
Further, the Council is committed to eliminating all fatal and
serious injury crashes by the end of year 2035.
Pa
g
e
2
7
0
o
f
2
7
6
Together, We can Save Lives
Because EVERY life counts
We Seek To Adopt Pasco’s Commitment Goal:
Reducing roadway fatalities and serious
injuries by 50% by 2040
Year 2040 Aligns with:
Currently Adopted Transportation System Master Plan
Pa
g
e
2
7
1
o
f
2
7
6
Questions?
Pa
g
e
2
7
2
o
f
2
7
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 13, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 8/18/25
FROM: Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Council Appointment Process for Council Position No. 4, Voting District
No. 4 (5 minute staff presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Council District No. 4 Vacancy
On August 10, 2025, Councilmember Pete Serrano submitted his resignation,
creating a vacancy in Council District No. 4.
Filling the Vacancy
Per PMC 1.15.130, when a vacancy occurs, the remaining Councilmembers
must appoint a qualified individual to serve until the next regular general
municipal election. At that election, a candidate will be elected to serve the
remainder of the unexpired term.
RCW 42.12.070 further specifies the process for filling nonpartisan vacancies:
(1) If one position is vacant, the remaining members of the governing
body shall appoint a qualified person.
(4) If no appointment is made within 90 days, the appointment authority
transfers to the Franklin County legislative authority.
(5) If the County fails to appoint within 180 days, the County or the
remaining Councilmembers may petition the Governor to make the
appointment.
Page 273 of 276
Eligibility Requirements
Under RCW 35.18.150 (Council – Eligibility), only a qualified elector of the city
may office forfeit Councilmember A must City the on serve Council.
immediately upon ceasing to meet eligibility requirements, being convicted of a
crime involving moral turpitude, or violating RCW 35.18.110.
The qualifications to be appointed to fill the vacancy are the same as those
required to be elected to the position:
1. Residency within the City of Pasco and within Council District No. 4.
2. Registered as a voter.
Current Appointment Considerations
Any qualified appointee to the current vacancy will serve until December 31,
2025, due to the timing of the ongoing election for Council Position No. 4.
Former Councilmember Serrano is the sole candidate on the ballot and, if
elected, will need to resign again following certification of the election and prior
to January 1, 2026. Upon receipt of this second resignation and its submission
to Franklin County Elections, the Council will have the option to reappoint the
same The possible one process. application a initiate or individual new
exception the above would be a successful write-in candidate defeating Mr.
Serrano.
V. DISCUSSION:
Over the past four years, three Councilmembers have resigned from the Pasco
City various the instance, each Council reasons. for remaining In
Councilmembers appointed a replacement within the 90-day timeframe
required by Washington State law.
General Appointment Process
Open the application process.
Staff verifies applicant eligibility.
Council reviews application materials.
Council conducts applicant interviews in an open public meeting.
Council determines the appointment date (either on the night of
selection or at a subsequent meeting).
Swearing-in new Councilmember.
Council Direction Requested
To support the process of filling the District 4 vacancy, staff seeks Council
direction on:
1. Recruitment Timeframe – Length of time to accept applications.
2. Interview Date – Date to conduct interviews in an open public meeting.
3. Appointment Date – Whether the selected applicant will be appointed
the same night as interviews or at the next regular meeting.
Page 274 of 276
Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and
appropriate investment and re- investment in community
infrastructure.
City Council Goals
QUALITY OF LIFE
2024-2025
Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services
and programs.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system.
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Implement targeted strategies to reduce crime through strategic
investments in infrastructure, staffing, and equipment.
COMMUNITY SAFETY
Promote and encourage economic vitality.
ECONOMIC VITALITY
Identify opportunities to enhance City of Pasco identity, cohesion,
and image.
CITY IDENTITY
Page 275 of 276
METAS DEL CONCEJO MUNICIPAL
2024-2025
Promover una alta calidad de vida a través de programas, servicios
y inversion apropiada y reinversión en la comunidad infraestructura
comunitaria.
CALIDAD DE VIDA
Promover viabilidad financiera a largo plazo, valor, y niveles de
calidad de los servicios y programas.
SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA
Promover un sistema de transporte multimodal altamente funcional.
RED DE TRANSPORTE DE LA COMUNIDAD
Implementar estrategias específicas para reducir la delincuencia por
medios de inversiones estratégicas en infraestructura, personal y equipo.
SEGURIDAD DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD
Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica.
VITALIDAD ECONOMICA
Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la
cohesión, y la imagen.
IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA
Page 276 of 276