HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025.06.09 Council Workshop Packet
AGENDA
City Council Workshop Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, June 9, 2025
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar
Page
1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would
like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out
the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment)
to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings
must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this workshop.
The Pasco City Council Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel
191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at
www.facebook.com/cityofPasco.
To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-332-249-0718 and use access
code 301 546 831#.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for
assistance.
Servicio de intéprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la
Secretaria Municipal dos dias antes para garantizar la disponiblidad.
(Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request.
Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure
availability.)
2. CALL TO ORDER
3. ROLL CALL
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
4. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
5. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC
COMMENT – the public may comment on each topic scheduled for
discussion, up to 2 minutes per person with a total of 8 minutes per item. If
Page 1 of 228
opposing sides wish to speak, then both sides receive an equal amount of
time to speak or up to 4 minutes each side.
4 - 11 (a) Resolution - Renewal Agreement with Visit Tri-Cities for the
Promotion of Tourism Management (5 minute staff presentation)
12 - 37 (b) Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Presentation (20 minute staff
presentation)
38 - 50 (c) Evaluating Building Code and Enforcement (30 minute staff
presentation)
Presentation: Hope Freije, Urban Designer, FRAMEWORK will
present the City of Pasco's Building Code and enforcement review.
51 - 58 (d) Resolution - Consideration of Waiver Related to PMC Section
9.40.020(e) for Special Event Application No. 44023 (5 minute
staff presentation)
59 - 85 (e) 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program Update (5
minute staff presentation)
86 - 116 (f) Ordinance - 2025 Issuance Bond for LID No. 152 (5 minute staff
presentation)
117 - 130 (g) Resolution - Professional Services Agreement Amendment No. 5
with WSP USA, Inc. for the Lewis Street Overpass Project (5
minute staff presentation)
Presentation - Michael Uhlman, WSP, Inc.
131 - 133 (h) Ordinance - Budget Amendment for Upsize Program Water and
Irrigation (5 minute staff presentation)
134 - 185 (i) Resolutions - Approving Three (3) Developer Reimbursement
Agreements for the Utility Improvements Associated with the
“Broadmoor TIF-Utility Package Project” (5 minute staff
presentation)
186 - 216 (j) Resolutions - Approving two (2) Developer Reimbursement
Agreements for the utility improvements associated with the “A”
Street Sports Complex Project (5 minute staff presentation)
217 - 226 (k) General Fund Monthly Report - April 2025 (2 minute staff report)
6. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION
Page 2 of 228
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION
(a) Discussion with Legal Counsel about Current or Potential
Litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) and to Consider Site Selection
or Acquisition of Real Estate Purchase or Lease if Likelihood
that Disclosure Would Increase Price per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)
(20 minutes)
8. ADJOURNMENT
9. ADDITIONAL NOTES
227 - 228 (a) Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only)
(b) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the
City Clerk for assistance.
Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por
favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para
garantizar la disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter
service may be provided upon request. Please provide two
business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.)
Page 3 of 228
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council May 29, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 6/9/25
FROM: Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution - Renewal Agreement with Visit Tri-Cities for the Promotion
of Tourism Management (5 minute staff presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution
Renewal Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
To provide promotion of tourism, Visit Tri-Cities receives 50% of the annual
average hotel/motel tax receipts collected from the first 2% levied for the five-
year period immediately preceding each year of the contract period for its
services in promoting tourism.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
By way of individual agreements with the Cities of Kennewick, Pasco, and
Richland, promotional services have been contracted through the Tri-Cities
Visitor & Convention Bureau (Visit Tri-Cities) since the Tourism Promotion Area
formation in 2004. Through this agreement, the City of Pasco receives a multi-
faceted approach to marketing Pasco to visitors, business investors, and those
looking to relocate. Further, Visit Tri-Cities dedicates resources to focus on
increasing tourism related to sports, business travel, and leisure.
The current agreement with Visit Tri-Cities expires December 31, 2025.
V. DISCUSSION:
The proposed 2026–2030 agreement with Visit Tri-Cities continues the City's
Page 4 of 228
long-standing regional partnership to promote Pasco and the Tri-Cities area as
a destination for tourism, conventions, and sporting events. The agreement
maintains the overall structure, scope of services, and funding formula from the
previous (2021–2025) contract. However, several updates and refinements
have been made to improve clarity and reporting efficiency:
Key Changes from the 2021-2025 Agreement:
The requirement for mid-year status report (formerly due August 15) has
been removed
Visit Tri-Cities will now provide a single, comprehensive year-end
accounting report in Q1 the following year.
The annual work plan, which outlines activities for the upcoming year , is
now due in Q4 (rather than in March), aligning better with the City's
budget and planning cycles.
The agreement reflects strong regional collaboration and shared goals among
the Cities of Pasco, Kennewick and Richland. All three cities participated in
reviewing and updating the agreement language in consultation with Visit Tri-
Cities. Richland and Kennewick are anticipated to consider approval of parallel
agreements.
Staff recommends City Council approval of the renewal agreement at the next
regular meeting.
Page 5 of 228
Resolution – 2026-2030 Visit Tri-Cities TPA Agreement - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
RENEWAL AGREEMENT WITH VISIT TRI-CITIES VISITOR AND
CONVENTION BUREAU FOR THE PROMOTION OF TOURISM.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco is authorized under Chapter 67.28 of the Revised Code of
Washington (RCW) to use lodging tax revenues for the purpose of tourism promotion and tourism-
related facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City has historically partnered with the Tri-Cities Visitor and Convention
Bureau, doing business as Visit Tri-Cities, to promote the Tri-Cities region, including Pasco, as a
destination for leisure travel, conventions, and sporting events; and
WHEREAS, the current tourism promotion agreement between the City of Pasco and Visit
Tri-Cities is set to expire on December 31, 2025; and
WHEREAS, a new five-year agreement has been negotiated in coordination with the cities
of Richland and Kennewick and Visit Tri-Cities, covering the period of January 1, 2026, through
December 31, 2030; and
WHEREAS, the proposed agreement retains the structure and core service expectations of
the previous agreement while incorporating minor changes, including the removal of the mid-year
report and the alignment of annual planning and reporting timelines with the City’s fiscal planning
process; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into the Renewal
Agreement with Visit Tri-Cities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the
Renewal Agreement for the Promotion of Tourism between the City of Pasco and the Tri-Cities
Visitor and Convention Bureau as attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the Interim City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington,
is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Renewal Agreement on behalf of
the City of Pasco; and to make minor substantive changes necessary to execute the Agreement.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 6 of 228
Resolution – 2026-2030 Visit Tri-Cities TPA Agreement - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 7 of 228
Renewal Agreement for the Promotion of Tourism - Page 1
RENEWAL AGREEMENT FOR THE PROMOTION OF TOURISM
THIS RENEWAL AGREEMENT is entered into between the CITY OF PASCO, a
municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and the TRI-CITIES VISITOR AND
CONVENTION BUREAU, a Washington non-profit corporation, doing business as "Visit TRI-
CITIES," hereinafter referred to as the "Bureau."
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants as set forth herein, the parties agree as
follows:
I.The Bureau agrees to perform promotional services for the City including, but not limited to,
advertising, publicizing and otherwise distributing information for the purpose of attracting
visitors and encouraging tourist expansion to and within the City. In providing such services the
Bureau shall:
1.Develop and implement a marketing and promotional plan that advertises and
promotes the Tri-Cities and the City for the purpose of attracting visitors. Appropriate
activities would include the production and distribution of a visitor guide, brochures,
participation in travel shows, conducting advertising campaigns and other activities
designed to promote the attractions of this area in targeted markets.
2.Manage and execute a comprehensive website and digital marketing campaigns
designed to educate travelers, drive demand, assist local businesses in staff recruitment
& relocation efforts, and complement City economic development strategies.
3.Provide City staff with accurate and detailed information on tourism statistics
including but not limited to hotel occupancies, economic impact figures, and group
histories to support the City's efforts to recruit businesses within the hospitality
industry.
4.Act as a membership organization and liaison to small businesses located in the City
that are dependent on tourism spending for financial success.
5.Solicit convention business and sports tournaments for the Tri-Cities and the City at
the regional and state level through activities such as:
A.Making contact with convention and sports planners and executives of
organizations and groups to solicit sports, meetings and conventions in the Tri-
Cities and the City.
B.Researching convention and sports leads and contacting convention
representatives of association groups and tournament representatives of sports
groups, promoting the Tri-Cities and the City and offering convention and
sports planning assistance.
C.Preparing and distributing invitational convention and sports bid packets including
information on the Tri-Cities and the City and the convention and sports facilities
available therein.
Page 8 of 228
Renewal Agreement for the Promotion of Tourism - Page 2
6. Provide prospective sports organization and convention representatives with
familiarization tours of venues and convention hotel facilities in the Tri-Cities and the City
for the purpose of assisting in the selection of a hotel(s) and/or other venues in which to
hold sports tournaments, conventions and meetings.
7.Provide convention chairpersons and/or association executives and sports tournament
directors with a bid packet and a planner's workbook to assist in planning conventions
and/or sports tournaments.
8.Assist future conventions and sporting events in maximizing attendance through pre- event
promotion. Produce promotional videos, collateral material, press releases, display booths
and marketing materials to be used twelve to eighteen months prior to the event to increase
awareness and create enthusiasm for attendance at Tri-Cities events.
9.Operate a visitor information center in the Tri-Cities to promote the Tri-Cities as a
destination of choice and encourage visitors to enjoy local attractions and amenities,
driving economic impact.
10.Include advertising material in promotional packets and other releases promoting regular
tourism related Tri-City activities and events.
11.Reserve a seat on the Bureau's Board of Directors for representation by the City Manager
or City Council Member.
12.Specific activities to be undertaken by the Bureau each year reflecting actions to be taken
in the above-noted categories of service shall be detailed in an annual work plan. The work
plan for the ensuing year will be presented to the City for approval in Q4 of each year.
II.For the services herein contemplated and more fully described in the annual work plan, the City
agrees to pay the Bureau fifty percent (50%) of the annual average hotel/motel tax receipts of the
City collected from the first two percent (2%) levied for the five-year period immediately preceding
each year of the contract period. The Bureau shall invoice the City for such services on a monthly
basis on the 1st of each month for the services provided the month prior.
1.Provision for Economic Downturn: In the event of an economic downturn wherein there is
a 15% decline in hotel/motel taxes over a period of six months, the parties agree to a
payment for services as described herein.
A.The base for comparison will be the same six-month period during the prior
year, or the average of 2023, 2024, 2025 (whichever is greater).
B.The 15% reduction in hotel/motel taxes will trigger a joint conversation
between all parties to this contact to establish, in good faith, a mutually
agreeable annual contract payment amount.
C.Should the parties be unable to come to an agreement, the annual contract
payment will be adjusted by the same percentage decline experienced over
the six-month period identified above.
Page 9 of 228
Renewal Agreement for the Promotion of Tourism - Page 3
D.The duration of payment adjustment will be a minimum of six months, and a
new calculation will be performed at the end of six months to determine if
another six-month adjustment is warranted. If not, normal payment amounts
will resume under the normal contract payment amount and be the basis for
monthly invoices from the Bureau.
2.Future Annual Contract Payment Calculations – For purposes of calculating the five-year
average used to determine the annual contract payment, the annual hotel/motel tax amount
for any year in which the provision for an economic downturn is enacted would be replaced
with the prior year’s annual hotel/motel tax, assuming it is a higher amount, and would
serve as the adjusted future annual contract payment amount supporting the basis for
monthly invoices from the Bureau.
III.Pursuant to the governing statute, (Ch. 67.28 RCW), restrictions have been placed on the use on the
use of hotel/motel tax funds as set forth in relevant part as follows: " ... used solely for the purpose of
paying all or any part of the cost of tourism promotion, acquisition of tourism-related facilities, or
operation of tourism-related facilities." RCW 67.28.1815
Funding is conditioned upon the Bureau entering into this Agreement setting forth the purposes for
which the funds will be used, providing a procedure for a project-end accounting and insuring
compliance with the statute.
To this end, the parties agree as follows:
1.The Bureau agrees to expend such funds to promote tourism in compliance with Ch.
67.28RCW.
2.At the conclusion of the calendar year, the Bureau shall provide a complete accounting of
the expended funds and the purposes therefore. This report will be submitted to the City in
Q1 of the ensuing year. A formal presentation to the City Council will be made if requested.
3.In the event the accounting indicates that funds were used for purposes not permitted by
law, the Bureau shall, within 30 days of notification by City to the Bureau of such improper
expenditures, remit the disallowed amount back to the City.
4.The Bureau shall maintain accurate records, regarding expenditure of funds related to its
purpose of promoting tourism in compliance with RCW 67.28, to support its annual
accounting for a calendar year, which shall be subject to inspection by the City upon 30
days’ notice of its intent to inspect the same.
5.Failing of the Bureau to either provide the accounting or remit disallowed funds as required
herein shall constitute a breach of this Agreement. The remedies available to the City shall
include but not be limited to, return of all funds delivered to the Bureau and denial of the
right of the Bureau to apply for any future funding.
6.In the event of a dispute regarding the enforcement, breach, default, or interpretation of this
Agreement, the parties shall first meet in a good faith effort to resolve such dispute. In the
event the dispute cannot be resolved by agreement of the parties, said dispute shall be
resolved by arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, with both parties waiving the
right of a jury trial upon trial de novo. The substantially prevailing party shall be entitled
Page 10 of 228
Renewal Agreement for the Promotion of Tourism - Page 4
to its reasonable attorney fees and costs as additional award and judgment against the other.
IV.This Agreement shall be effective on January 1, 2026, and shall expire on December 31, 2030;
provided, however, the City may terminate the Agreement with at least one (1) year written notice
delivered to the Bureau.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed this
, day of 2025.
CITY OF PASCO
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney Mayor
TRI-CITIES VISITOR AND
CONVENTION BUREAU,
a Washington non-profit corporation,
d/b/a Visit TRI-CITIES
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kevin Lewis, President & CEO
Page 11 of 228
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 3, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 6/9/25
FROM: Haylie Miller, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Presentation (20 minute staff
presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
PowerPoint Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Framework has been contracted for $299,768 to assist with the
Comprehensive Plan update. This cost is fully covered by the Washington
State Department of Commerce through the Periodic Update Grant and the
Climate Planning Grant.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City of Pasco is kicking off a major update, often referred to as the periodic
update, to its Comprehensive Plan, which will guide how the City grows and
develops over the next 20 years. This update is required under Washington’s
Growth Management Act (GMA), specifically RCW 36.70A.130(5)(c), which
calls for cities in Franklin County to review and update their plans by December
31, 2026.
Pasco’s Comprehensive Plan serves as a long-term roadmap for decisions
about the and development, economic land housing, use, transportation,
the environment. The upcoming update will build on recent efforts—like
Housing Action Plan and Downtown Pasco Master Plan—and ensure the City’s
policies reflect current community needs and state requirements.
The last major update to the Plan was completed in 2018. Since then, the State
Page 12 of 228
has added several new planning requirements that cities must address,
including:
Supporting a wider range of housing types and income levels;
Planning for climate change and community resiliency;
Streamlining development processes;
Updating parking regulations; and
Aligning with recent changes in state law.
Pasco is expected to grow to 121,290 residents by 2046, with 18,831 new
homes needed to keep up with demand. This Plan update is a key opportunity
to make sure the City is ready for that growth in a way that’s thoughtful,
equitable, and sustainable.
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff and Framework's consulting team, which includes Jeff Arango and Hope
Freije, will provide a presentation to Council.
Planning Commissioners are expected to be in the audience, following the
presentation there will be a brief discussion on a joint Council - Commission
meeting to allow for a discussion on the update.
Page 13 of 228
Comprehensive Plan
Update
City Council Presentation
June 09, 2025Pa
g
e
1
4
o
f
2
2
8
Agenda
1.Project team
2.Planning Context
3.Project Schedule + Public
Engagement
4.Discussion Questions
Pa
g
e
1
5
o
f
2
2
8
Project Team HOPE FREIJE
PROJECT MANAGER
MATT CAMPBELL
PLANNING LEAD
JEFF ARANGO
PROJECT DIRECTORPa
g
e
1
6
o
f
2
2
8
Planning ContextPa
g
e
1
7
o
f
2
2
8
City Council Priorities
PUBLIC SAFETY
STREAMLINE CODES
AND PERMITS
DOWNTOWN
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
PLANNING IN RIVERVIEW
HOUSING
Pa
g
e
1
8
o
f
2
2
8
New State
Legislation
Housing for all Economic Segments and
Addressing Disparate Impact
Parking Reform and Modernization
Act
5-Year Implementation Progress Report
Climate Change Action, Resilience, and
Environmental Justice
Easing Barriers to Developing ADUs
Streamlining Development Regulations
SEPA Exemption for Housing
HB 1220 ……
(A. 2021)
HB 1241 …….
(A. 2022)
HB 1181 ……..
HB 1293 ……
SB 5412 …...
*SB 5184 …..
HB 1181 ……..
Pa
g
e
1
9
o
f
2
2
8
2018 Plan
UGA
Expansion to
the North
Not in City
Limits
Downtown
Pasco
Master Plan
Pa
g
e
2
0
o
f
2
2
8
RiverviewPa
g
e
2
1
o
f
2
2
8
Housing Allocation
18,831Pasco City + UGA new housing units
121,290 future population
estimate (2046)
157 emergency housing
Pa
g
e
2
2
o
f
2
2
8
Growth trends
Franklin County + Pasco
Franklin County Is the 2nd fastest
growing county in WA
85.7%Avg share of county growth
in Pasco since 2018
88%
Growth per year in Pasco
since 2018, with a general
decline in yearly increase
Average of 1475
Of county growth allocated
to Pasco + UGA for 2046
Pa
g
e
2
3
o
f
2
2
8
Housing Allocation
Pasco City + UGA
1,839 0-30% AMI (non-PSH)
1,833 0-30% AMI (PSH)
2,511 >30-50% AMI
3,511 >50-80% AMI
1,824 >80-100% AMI
1,618 >100-120% AMI
6,133 >120% AMI
18,831 new housing units
Pa
g
e
2
4
o
f
2
2
8
Land Capacity
2018Pa
g
e
2
5
o
f
2
2
8
Project Schedule +
EngagementPa
g
e
2
6
o
f
2
2
8
Timeline
Pa
g
e
2
7
o
f
2
2
8
Draft
BrandingPa
g
e
2
8
o
f
2
2
8
Public Engagement Plan
Pa
g
e
2
9
o
f
2
2
8
Phase 1: Education
& Awareness
●Build awareness around the
Comprehensive Plan Update
schedule, deliverables, and
opportunities for feedback
●Create landing page for document
review, surveys, and educational
material
●Establish connections with
stakeholder groups
Pa
g
e
3
0
o
f
2
2
8
Stakeholders
Spanish-speaking residents
Low-income residents
Outside Agencies
Service Providers
Business owners +
associations
Kids, seniors, studentsPa
g
e
3
1
o
f
2
2
8
Phase 2: Survey
& Visioning
●Hear from a wide swatch of
residents through topic-specific
surveys that will inform the
development of plan element
updates.
●Create a vision statement
through a collaborative
community process.
●Work with City Council and
Planning Commission on strategies
and decisions.
Pa
g
e
3
2
o
f
2
2
8
Marketing
Pa
g
e
3
3
o
f
2
2
8
Phase 3: Feedback
& Refinement
●Gather feedback on plan
elements from elected officials,
stakeholder groups, and the
general public.
●Host a Community Open House
that brings residents and other
stakeholders together to learn
about and provide feedback on
proposed updates.
Pa
g
e
3
4
o
f
2
2
8
Online Tools
Pa
g
e
3
5
o
f
2
2
8
Discussion Questions
Pa
g
e
3
6
o
f
2
2
8
Discussions
Questions
●Challenges and opportunities
●Focus areas:Downtown,
Riverview, Broadmoor
●Public engagement strategiesPa
g
e
3
7
o
f
2
2
8
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 5, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 6/9/25
FROM: Haylie Miller, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Evaluating Building Code and Enforcement (30 minute staff
presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Powerpoint
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presentation: Hope Freije, Urban Designer, FRAMEWORK will present the City
of Pasco's Building Code and enforcement review.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Throughout 2025, City staff and Framework reviewed reported issues and the
Pasco Municipal Code related to occupancy uses. Interviews with downtown
building owners and managers were conducted followed by a review of
international building code standards for maximum flexibility.
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff seeks the opportunity to provide more clear direction to building owners
related to building and fire code requirements in an efficient and easy to
understand manner. A presentation will be provided to City Council. Council is
encouraged to ask questions and provide direction to staff, and the consultant
related to next steps.
Page 38 of 228
Pathways to “Yes”
Evaluating Building Code and Enforcement
Pasco, WA | June 09, 2025
Pa
g
e
3
9
o
f
2
2
8
●Goal of activating Downtown includes
allowing for events and programming in
buildings
●Complaints of restrictions on uses such as
karaoke and informal dinners
●Need to understand the code basis for these
decisions in order to best understand how to
support businesses who wish to activate their
buildings with entertainment and other uses
Project Background
Building Code Audit | June 9, 2025
Pa
g
e
4
0
o
f
2
2
8
Process:
Building Code Audit | June 9, 2025
JAN
2025
FEB
2025
MAR
2025
MAY
2025
Review of IBC’s
and memo on
findings
Interviews with
Downtown
building
owners/managers
Review of
reported issues
and PMC’s related
to occupancy use
Consultation with
City Team
Pa
g
e
4
1
o
f
2
2
8
●Fire sprinkler requirements
○Occupancy Loads
○Night Club/Viewing Area definitions
●Special/Temporary Uses
○Karaoke
○Informal Dinners
Findings: Main Issues
Building Code Audit | June 9, 2025
Pa
g
e
4
2
o
f
2
2
8
Need for clarity among staff and constituents:
●When are sprinklers required
●What is a nightclub
●What constitutes a viewing area/nightclub
Findings: Main Takeaways
Building Code Audit | June 9, 2025
Pa
g
e
4
3
o
f
2
2
8
●Occupancy Load of 100+ people
●Viewing area 350+ sq. ft.
When Are Sprinklers Required
Building Code Audit | June 9, 2025
Pa
g
e
4
4
o
f
2
2
8
●Change in Occupancy Use
●Nonconforming structure has been damaged for 6
months or abandoned for 1+ years (PMC 5.170.060)
●Building renovation or new construction
When Are Requirements Triggered
Building Code Audit | June 9, 2025
Pa
g
e
4
5
o
f
2
2
8
PMC: 25.15.160
“Nightclub” means an establishment that provides
entertainment and has as its primary source of revenue
(a) the sale of alcohol for consumption on the premises
and (b) cover charges. It does not mean premises
wherein such beverages are sold in conjunction with the
sale of food for consumption on the premises and the
sale of said beverages comprises less than 25 percent of
the gross receipts.
What is a Nightclub
Building Code Audit | June 9, 2025
RCW: 19.27.510
"Nightclub" means an A-2 occupancy use under the
2006 international building code in which the aggregate
area of concentrated use of unfixed chairs and
standing space that is specifically designated and
primarily used for dancing or viewing performers
exceeds three hundred fifty square feet, excluding
adjacent lobby areas. "Nightclub" does not include
theaters with fixed seating, banquet halls, or lodge halls.
Pa
g
e
4
6
o
f
2
2
8
“One of the defining criteria for “nightclub” is the floor
area referenced in the definition. The floor area must
be a concentrated use of standing space
specifically designated and primarily used for
dancing or viewing a performance and exceed 350
square feet.The nightclub fire sprinkler requirement
is intended to apply to clubs similar to The Station
Nightclub in Rhode Island,with a large number of
occupants in a concentrated area. A restaurant,
restaurant lounge, bar, tavern, club or similar
area/facility with a piano bar or an area for a karaoke
singer is not the type of use intended to be addressed
by the nightclub sprinkler requirement.”
State Building Code Interpretation
No. 08-09
Building Code Audit | June 9, 2025
Pa
g
e
4
7
o
f
2
2
8
Ways to Comply
●Designate viewing area 350 sq. ft. or less
●Limit occupancy -fire walls
●Hire a fire protection engineer
●Recurring Special Event Permit
○May require “fire watch”
Building Code Audit | June 9, 2025
Pa
g
e
4
8
o
f
2
2
8
Next Steps
●Interpretation Memo
●Sprinkler Guide and/or public meeting to clarify requirements
●Recurring Special Event Permit
●Clarify PMC Zoning Nightclub definition
Building Code Audit | June 9, 2025
Pa
g
e
4
9
o
f
2
2
8
Questions/comments?
Building Code Audit | June 9, 2025
Pa
g
e
5
0
o
f
2
2
8
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 9, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 6/9/25
FROM: Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Section PMC to Related Waiver of Consideration - Resolution
9.40.020(e) for Special Event Application No. 44023 (5 minute staff
presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution
Letter from applicant
PMC 9.40.020
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion and direction
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
City staff received a request for a beer garden to be held at Memorial Park in
conjunction with a public event.
The Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Section 9.40.020 prohibits the possession
and consumption of alcohol in any City park or recreational facility unless the
applicant has secured a valid rental permit. One of the conditions (subsection
e) mandates that events must be private and by invitation only, unless this
requirement is waived by the City Council via resolution. The applicants plan
for the event to be open to the general public rather than a private or invitation
only event, triggering the need for Council consideration of this request.
Staff reviewed the submitted request and determined that all other conditions
of PMC Section 9.40.020 have been met, including banquet permit, increased
rental fee, insurance, security, and liability requirements. The applicant now
Page 51 of 228
seeks a waiver of subsection (e) to allow for alcohol service at an event that is
open to the general public.
NEIGHBORING CITIES
To evaluate the City’s current code, staff conducted a comparative review of
similar policies in Kennewick and Richland:
Kennewick (KMC 10.16.061 & 2025 Special Event Guide)
Alcohol may be allowed in City parks with written approval from the
Parks & Recreation Director or City Manager.
No City Council waiver is required.
Higher security deposit and comprehensive public safety requirements
are enforced.
Alcohol service is subject to time, ID verification, security staffing, and
lighting regulations.
Alcohol service must have appropriate State liquor permits and liability
insurance.
Richland (RMC 9.24.120 & Private Special Event Agreement)
Alcohol is prohibited in public spaces unless allowed by RCW Title 66 or
local code.
Permitted alcohol areas must be enclosed; ID checks and licensed
servers are mandatory.
Security requirements scale with event size.
Council involvement is not required; staff handles approval through
special event processes.
V. DISCUSSION:
With respect to the waiver, staff is requesting Council consider the following:
Waiver for Special Event No. 44023
Staff recommends that Council consider the attached resolution granting a
waiver of PMC 9.40.020(e) to allow public attendance at the beer garden
proposed for Memorial Park. This would enable the event to proceed under the
outlined conditions while still complying with all other safety and liability
measures. If waiver is not approved, event will take place as all provisions of
Special Event Application Process are completed.
Discussion on Consideration of Amendments to PMC 9.40.020
As Council is aware, both Council and staff are reviewing aspects of the
municipal code and other processes and procedures to streamline, increase
efficiencies, and improve customer service. In considering this item and the
process provided for in the PMC, staff is suggesting that Council may wish to
consider the points below at a future Workshop meeting as potential updates to
Page 52 of 228
PMC 9.40.020 including:
Designate Eligible Locations: Create a defined list of parks and
facilities where alcohol may be permitted under controlled
conditions.
Remove Council Waiver Requirement: If alcohol is restricted to a
subset of parks, the need for Council to approve waivers for public
events could be eliminated, and staff could then make
determinations based on criteria established by the City Council by
ordinance.
Require Special Event Permit Process: Another alternative to
consider would be to require that any event with alcohol in City
facilities or parks go through the established Special Event Permit
process, which involves cross-departmental review. Note that this
option adds process.
These proposed changes could increase clarity for applicants and simplify
the application process.
Page 53 of 228
Resolution – Wavier for Special Event App. No. 44023 - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE LIMITED USE OF LIQUOR WITHIN A DESIGNATED
AREA AT MEMORIAL PARK FOR SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATION NO.
44023.
WHEREAS, the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Section 9.40.020(e) provides that the City
Council may, by resolution, waive the requirement that issuance of rental permit for a City park
or recreation building where liquor is open, consumed, possessed, or displayed is to be limited to
either invite specifically named individuals or actual members of the applicant’s organization; and
WHEREAS, the 2025 Pride Festival is scheduled to take place at Memorial Park in the
City of Pasco and the event organizers have requested authorization to include a designated beer
garden as part of the permitted activities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to ensure the safety, accessibility, and responsible
use of City property, and therefore, wishes to waive requirement for the use of the designated area
under specified conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That authorization is hereby granted for the possession and consumption of alcohol in a
designated area at Memorial Park during on June 22, 2025, in accordance with the provisions of
Pasco Municipal Code Section 9.40.020.
Be It Further Resolved, that the Parks and Recreation Director is authorized to issue the
necessary facility rental permit for the event and to establish all terms and conditions related to
alcohol service, including but not limited to security, insurance, sanitation, and compliance with
applicable state and local regulations.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 54 of 228
Statement for Rental Permit Waiver
Alcohol at Public Event
To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to affirm that the Tri-Cities Pride Festival, scheduled for June 22, 2025, at Memorial
Park, is a public community event intended to celebrate and support the LGBTQIA+ community in
the Tri-Cities region.
We respectfully request a waiver of the requirement that attendance be limited to named individuals
or members of the hosting organization, pursuant to Pasco Municipal Code 9.40.020 , due to the
nature of this being an inclusive public celebration that is open to all members of the community.
Purpose of the Beer Garden:
The inclusion of a designated beer garden is intentional and meaningful. It provides a casual, social
atmosphere for adult attendees to relax, connect, and enjoy local offerings in a setting that
promotes community and inclusion. Events like ours aim to reflect the diverse ways people
celebrate Pride-from family activities to food, music, and shared spaces where adults can gather
responsibly.
Additionally, having a controlled and licensed beer garden allows us to:
- Support a local small business (CG Public House), which is licensed and equipped to handle
beverage service.
- Maintain a safe and well-monitored environment where alcohol consumption is limited to a
single, secure space.
- Meet the expectations of adult attendees who are accustomed to this feature at other public
Pride festivals nationwide.
Safety and Logistical Provisions, the beer garden area will be:
- Hosted and managed by CG Public House, a licensed local catering company with full liquor
Licensing.
- Fenced off, with ID checks and professional security at the entrance.
- Located near restrooms for convenience and away from the children's area to ensure proper
separation.
- Both Tri-Cities Pride and CG Public House carry adequate insurance coverage, including
liquor liability coverage.
Page 55 of 228
- We have hired professional security to monitor the beer garden and festival grounds
throughout the event.
- All required documentation to support this request has already been submitted to the
appropriate city departments.
We appreciate your consideration of this waiver and are happy to provide any additional
documentation or clarification needed.
Sincerely,
A'isha Martin
President, Tri-Cities Pride
Page 56 of 228
9.40.020 Consumption within park and recreation facilities prohibited
without permit.
(1) It is unlawful to open a package containing liquor, or to possess or display an open container of liquor or to
consume liquor in any City park or recreation buildings, facility or structures within the City without a current
rental permit issued by the City. A rental permit may be issued upon application for such rental permit from the
Administrative and Community Services Director of the City of Pasco or his designee. Such rental permit may be
issued on the following conditions:
(a) The applicant must produce evidence that he has a banquet permit from the Washington State Liquor
Control Board;
(b) Payment of rent in an amount 50 percent higher than the regular rental fee;
(c) The applicant deposits a sum determined by the Administrative and Community Services Director to be
sufficient to insure proper performance of cleanup by the applicant subsequent to the event for which the
banquet and rental permit is issued and for payment of damages;
(d) The applicant furnishes to the City evidence that he has in full force and effect a liability insurance policy
that includes liquor liability, in such amounts and coverages as prescribed by the City’s insurer covering any
bodily injury or property damage arising out of or in any way connected with the use of the City facility by the
applicant. A surety bond approved by the City in the same amounts may substitute for insurance;
(e) The applicant must affirm in writing that the attendance at the function for which the rental permit is
issued is not pursuant to a general invitation to the public, but pursuant to invitations to either specifically
named individuals or to actual members of the applicant’s organization; provided, that the City Council may
waive this requirement by resolution upon a showing by the applicant that special circumstances exist which
would merit such waiver, and that adequate provisions have been made to accommodate the anticipated
number of persons who attend the function for which the rental permit is issued;
(f) The applicant agrees that he or she will save the City of Pasco harmless from all losses or damage
occasioned to him or her or to any third person or party by reason of any act or omissions of the applicant or
anyone using the premises pursuant to the rental permit. He or she shall, after reasonable notice thereof, pay
the expense of any suit which may be commenced against the City of Pasco by any third person alleging
injury or loss by reason of such acts;
(g) The applicant shall furnish written confirmation from the Chief of Police of the City of Pasco that
adequate provision has been made by the applicant for police, security, and traffic control, considering the
type of activity purposed by the applicant;
(h) The applicant shall comply with all applicable fire codes and regulations.
Ch. 9.40 Intoxicating Liquor | Pasco Municipal Code Page 1 of 2
The Pasco Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 4766, passed May 5, 2025.
Page 57 of 228
The Pasco Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 4766, passed May 5, 2025.
Disclaimer: The City Clerk’s office has the official version of the Pasco Municipal Code. Users should contact the
City Clerk’s office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above.
City Website: www.pasco-wa.gov
City Telephone: (509) 544-3080
Hosted by General Code.
(2) Any person violating this section shall be guilty of a Class 3 civil infraction and subject to the penalties
imposed thereon by law. [Ord. 3757 § 1, 2006; Ord. 3495 § 1, 2001; Ord. 2333 § 1, 1982; Code 1970 § 9.20.020.]
Ch. 9.40 Intoxicating Liquor | Pasco Municipal Code Page 2 of 2
The Pasco Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 4766, passed May 5, 2025.
Page 58 of 228
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 2, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 6/9/25
FROM: Maria Serra, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program Update (5 minute staff
presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Presentation
Preliminary 2026-2031 TIP Project Costs
Preliminary 2026-2031 TIP Project Annual Allocations
Preliminary 2026-2031 TIP Project Descriptions
Project Map
Public Engagement Summary Report
In-Person Public Comments
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presentation
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
As part of the City’s effort to provide for the proper and necessary development
of a functional transportation network, the City shall, as required by State law
(RCW 35.77.010), develop and adopt annually a Six-Year Transportation
Improvement Program (Six-Year TIP) with such program acting as a guide for
the coordinated development of the City's transportation system. The Six-Year
TIP of the City specifically sets forth those projects and programs of both City
and regional significance that benefit the transportation system and promote
public safety and efficient multi-modal movement.
Projects in the TIP are selected from master plans such as the Transportation
System Master Plan, Broadmoor Master Plan, Downtown Pasco Master Plan,
Page 59 of 228
and Local Road Safety Plan. Additionally, they are identified through
community engagement, stakeholder coordination (e.g., with the Pasco School
District and operational and improvements), Routes to Safe for School
maintenance needs identified by City Departments.
Development of the 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program is led by
Public Works Department, and informed by the City Council, the public,
community stakeholders, and other city staff.
Update of the TIP and subsequent submission to the State are statutory
requirements, and while the program is not required to be fiscally constrained,
the program should be practical and feasible. The Council will see many of
these annual Capital Six-Year the with incorporated again, projects
Improvement Plan later this year.
Staff provided introductory presentations to City Council, outlining the process
and next steps in preparing the 2026-2031 TIP project list at the March 24th
and April 21st City Council Meetings. On May 19th, City Council held a public
hearing to consider the 2026-2014 Transportation Improvement Program.
V. DISCUSSION:
The proposed 2026-2031 TIP project list encompasses 45 projects, 3 programs
and 5 studies (53 items in total).
Projects anticipated to be completed by the end of 2025 have been excluded
from for below listed are projects TIP. 2026-2031 proposed the These
reference:
Burns Rd/Broadmoor Blvd Intersection Improvements
Sandifur Parkway Extension
Sandifur Pkwy/Broadmoor Blvd Intersection Improvements
Road 108 Extension
W "A" St/6th Ave Pedestrian Crossing
Commercial Ave/Kartchner St Intersection Improvements
Citywide Injury Minimization and Speed Management Implementation
The proposed list incorporates newly identified projects and plans; these
include:
South Rd 68 Pavement Preservation (I-182 to Court St)
N 4th Ave Pavement Preservation (I-182 to County Line)
Road 44 FCID Canal Crossing
Safe Routes to School Project (Locations TBD)
Court St Safety Improvements - Phase 2 (Road 96 to Road 68)
Road 68/Taylor Flats Rd Intersection Study
Page 60 of 228
Additionally, the scope of the James Street Improvements project has been
revised to focus exclusively on pavement preservation and reconstruction. All
work will occur along the existing roadway alignment, and no additional
infrastructure will be included as part of this project.
Of note, this proposed TIP project list reflects the edits to the 2025-2030 TIP
amended during City Council regular meeting on May 5, 2025. It therefore
includes the following:
Court St & Rd 100 Intersection Improvements (added project)
Harris Rd Realignment (added project)
Burns Rd/Rd 68 Intersection Improvements (separated intersection
phase as own project from Burns Rd Extension - Missing Link project)
Special attention was put forth to accurately represent projects that are funded
with Federal and State dollars. Projects that have received funding in the last
year have been updated to reflect their funding status. As a reminder, this plan
is focused on projects that are anticipated to be delivered by the City, if funding
is secured.
Per State statute, the updated TIP must be adopted by July 1st and then
submitted to the Washington State Secretary of Transportation within 30 days
of adoption. The plan/program may at any time be revised by a majority of the
City Council, but only after a public hearing.
Public Outreach
Staff has actively promoted the 2026-2031 TIP in an effort to solicit community
feedback, input, and to address comments and questions from community
members. Public engagement efforts completed include two outreach events,
including:
April 21, 2025, 5:30-6:30 PM at City Hall (presentation and open house)
May 7, 2025, 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM at GESA stadium (open house).
Online platform for submission of comment was also available for the general
public. Outreach efforts summary and written comments submitted are
attached to the agenda report.
Next Steps
Staff is requesting guidance from the Council to ensure the Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) aligns with its transportation priorities. Adoption of
the 2026–2031 TIP is scheduled for June 16, 2025.
Page 61 of 228
June 9, 2025
Pasco City Council
Workshop
Pa
g
e
6
2
o
f
2
2
8
2026-2031
Transportation
Improvement Program
June 9 2025
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
6
3
o
f
2
2
8
RCW 35.77.010 – Prepare a comprehensive transportation
plan for the ensuing six years that is:
• Consistent with comprehensive plans
• Includes bicycle and pedestrian facilities
• Deadline: July 1, 2025
• Filed with the secretary of transportation within 30 days of
adoption
2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program
3
Pa
g
e
6
4
o
f
2
2
8
TIP identifies:
•Proposed name and brief scope
•Proposed Schedule
•Estimated cost per project (per phase)
•Design
•Right-of-Way
•Construction
•Funding sources
2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program
4
Pa
g
e
6
5
o
f
2
2
8
Preliminary 2026-2031 TIP Project List
45 Projects; 3 Programs; 5 Studies
WORK DONE:
•Identified completed projects and removed them
•Updated project funding, cost, and schedule
•Completed outreach
•Incorporated feedback
STILL TO DO:
•Council adoption
2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program
5
Pa
g
e
6
6
o
f
2
2
8
6
Pa
g
e
6
7
o
f
2
2
8
7
Pa
g
e
6
8
o
f
2
2
8
8
Pa
g
e
6
9
o
f
2
2
8
Next Steps
• Present draft 2026-2031 TIP April
• Outreach April/May
• Update to Council on feedback May
• Edits to TIP May
• Public Hearing May 19
• Final edits to TIP June 9
• Adoption by July 2025 June 16
2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program
9
Pa
g
e
7
0
o
f
2
2
8
Questions?Pa
g
e
7
1
o
f
2
2
8
PRELIMINARY 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Plan DRAFT 06/02/2025
Column1 Project Title Road Name Begin/End Termini PE ROW CONST Total Ranked Funding Type
PROJECTS
1 SRTS Argent Rd/Rd 88 & Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 90 Pedestrian Crossings Argent Road Road 88 197,008$ 982,048$ 1,179,056$ 1 Secured Grant
2 Lewis Street Underpass Demolition Lewis Street 1st Ave to Tacoma Ave 500,000$ 2,800,000$ 3,300,000$ 1 Planned Grant
3 Rd 40 E Extension Road 40 East 'A' Street/ East Lewis Place 80,000$ 380,000$ 1,468,000$ 1,928,000$ 1 Local Funds
4 Ainsworth Ave Pavement Preservation Ainsworth Ave Oregon Ave/10th ave 440,000$ 250,000$ 1,442,000$ 2,132,000$ 1 Secured Grant/Local Funds
5 Sylvester St Overpass Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Sylvester Street US 395 Overpass 1,000,000$ 3,229,340$ 4,229,340$ 1 Secured Grant
6 Lewis Street Pavement Preservation Lewis Street US12/27th Ave 440,000$ 250,000$ 4,556,000$ 5,246,000$ 1 Secured Grant/Local Funds
7 Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 76 Intersection Safety Enhancements Sandifur Parkway Road 76 371,000$ 1,660,000$ 2,031,000$ 1 Secured Grant
8 Clark St Improvements Clark Street 10th St/2nd St 350,000$ 1,450,000$ 1,800,000$ 1 Planned Grant
9 Rd 76 Overpass Road 76 Chapel Hill/Burden Blvd 3,580,000$ 2,604,000$ 24,575,000$ 30,759,000$ 2 Planned grant /Private Contributions/Local Funds
10 Burns Rd/Rd 68 Intersection Improvements Burns Road Rd 68 450,000$ 200,000$ 1,350,000$ 2,000,000$ 1 Planned Grant/Local Funds
11 Harris Rd Realignment Rd 103 Sandifur Pkwy 250,000$ 1,650,000$ 1,900,000$ 1 Local Funds
12 Burns Rd Extension - Missing link Burns Road Road 68/Rio Grande Lane 600,000$ 1,250,000$ 4,150,000$ 6,000,000$ 1 Local Funds/Private contributions
13 Burden Blvd/Rd 60 Intersection Improvements Burden Road Road 60 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000$ 2 Local Funds (TIF Impact)
14 City Wide Traffic Signal Improvements (Phase 3) Multiple Locations Multiple Locations 300,000$ 2,877,500$ 3,177,500$ 1 Planned Grant
15 E Lewis St/Heritage Blvd Intersection Improvements E Lewis Street Heritage Blvd 400,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,400,000$ 2 Local Funds/Private Contributions
16 South Rd 68 Pavement Preservation Court St I-182 350,000$ 350,000$ 1,500,000$ 2,200,000$ 2 Planned Grant/Local Funds
17 Safe Routes to School Project TBD TBD 300,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,300,000$ 2 Planned Grant
18 Road 44 FCID Canal Crossing Road 44 FCID Canal (North of Argent PI) 400,000$ 1,600,000$ 2,000,000$ 2 Planned Grant/Local Funds
19 South 4th Ave (Festival Street Improvements) S 4th Avenue Lewis Street / Columbia Street 290,000$ 790,000$ 1,080,000$ 2 Planned Grant
20 Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 84 Intersection Improvements Sandifur Parkway Road 84 350,000$ 1,900,000$ 2,250,000$ 2 Planned Grant/Private Contributions
21 Sacajawea Heritage Trail Levee Lowering Sacajawea Heritage Trail Road 54/Road 72 250,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,250,000$ 2 Planned Grant
22 Court & Rd 100 Intersection Improvements Court St Rd 100 500,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,500,000$ 6,000,000$ 2 Local Funds
23 Court Street/Road 60 Intersection Improvements Court St Rd 60 450,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,950,000$ 2 Planned Grant
24 Sandifur Pkwy/Convention Dr Intersection Improvements Sandifur Parkway Convention Dr 410,000$ 1,900,000$ 2,310,000$ 2 Local Funds/private contributions
25 I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Multiuse Pathway/Bridge Broadmoor Boulevard I-182 1,500,000$ 8,000,000$ 9,500,000$ 3 Planned Grant/Local Funds
26 Columbia St Improvements Columbia Street 10th St/2nd St 390,000$ 1,190,000$ 1,580,000$ 3 Planned Grant
27 Burden Rd/Rd 44 Intersection Improvements Burden Road Road 44 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000$ 3 Local funds (TIF Impact)
28 Rd 40 East Pathway Road 40 East Sacajawea Park/East Lewis Place 440,000$ 690,000$ 840,000$ 1,970,000$ 3 Planned Grant
29 Rainier Ave/Kartchner St Intersection Improvements Rainier Ave Kartchner 400,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,400,000$ 3 Local Funds/Private contributions
30 Court St Improvements- Ped/Bike Court Street Road 96/Harris Road 1,480,000$ 5,800,000$ 7,280,000$ 3 Planned Grant
31 Rd 76 Improvements - Sandifur Pkwy to Cordero Dr Road 76 Sandifur Pkwy/Cordero Dr 300,000$ 1,700,000$ 2,000,000$ 3 Local Funds
32 N 4th Ave Pavement Preservation (I-182 to County Line) I-182 County Line (Glade Rd) 150,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,750,000$ 2 Planned Grant/Local Match
33 Argent Rd Widening (Phase 4) Argent Road Road 36/Road 44 1,180,000$ 4,720,000$ 5,900,000$ 4 Planned Grant/Local Funds
34 Franklin County Irrigation District Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway N/A Road 100/Road 76 300,000$ 1,800,000$ 2,000,000$ 4,100,000$ 4 Planned Grant
35 Rd 100 Widening Road 100 Court St/Chapel Hill Blvd 825,000$ 750,000$ 7,000,000$ 8,575,000$ 4 Planned Grant
36 Shoreline Rd Realignment Shoreline Road Court/Burns Road 500,000$ 2,500,000$ 7,500,000$ 10,500,000$ 4 Planned Grant
37 Burns Rd Extension to Glade Rd Burns Road "Road 44"/N Glade Road 4,800,000$ 4,000,000$ 19,200,000$ 28,000,000$ 4 Planned Grant
38 Burden Rd/Madison Ave Intersection Improvements Burden Road Madison Ave 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000$ 5 Local funds (TIF Impact)
39 Court St Safety Improvements Court Street Road 40/Road 68 110,000$ 340,000$ 450,000$ 5 Planned Grant
40 James St Improvements James Street Oregon Ave/Frontier Lp 250,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,850,000$ 5 Local Funds
41 Harris Rd / Crescent Rd Overpass Harris Road Harris Road/Crescent Rd 4,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 45,000,000$ 54,000,000$ 5 Planned grant /Private contributions/local funds
42 Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 1) Lewis Street 2nd Ave/ 5th Ave 880,000$ 4,800,000$ 5,680,000$ 5 Planned Grant/Local
43 Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 2) Lewis Street 5th Ave/10th Ave 640,000$ 4,460,000$ 5,100,000$ 5 Planned Grant/Local
44 I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Improvements - Westbound Broadmoor Boulevard I-182 750,000$ 8,000,000$ 8,750,000$ 5 Planned Grant/Local Match
45 Court St Safety Improvements (Phase 2) Court Street Road 68/Road 96 680,000$ 680,000$ 5,100,000$ 6,460,000$ 5 Planned Grant/Local Funds
PROGRAMS
46 Annual Pavement Preservation Multiple Locations Multiple Locations -$ 1 Local funds
47 Ped/Bike Gap Program Multiple Locations Multiple Locations -$ 2 Local funds
48 Neighborhood Traffic Calming program Multiple Locations Multiple Locations -$ 2 Local funds
PLANS AND STUDIES
49 Comprehensive Safety Action Plan(SS4A) 400,000$ 400,000$ 1 Secured Grant/local match
50 Traffic Analysis for US 12 US 12 A /Tank Farm Road 3,060,000$ 3,060,000$ 1 Planned Grant
51 Interchange Feasibility Study on I-182 I-182 Multiple Existing Interchanges 450,000$ 450,000$ 2 Local Funds
52 Rd 68/Taylor Flats Rd Intersection Study Road 68 Taylor Flats Rd/Columbia River 350,000$ 350,000$ 3 Local Funds
53 Sign Reflectivity Analysis and Implementation 112,000$ 400,000$ 512,000$ 4 Planned Grant
268,548,896$
Pa
g
e
7
2
o
f
2
2
8
PRELIMINARY 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Plan DRAFT 06/02/2025
Column1 Project Title Road Name Begin/End Termini Prior Year 2026 Year 2027 Year 2028 Year 2029 Year 2030 Year 2031 REMAINDER 6 year- plan
PROJECTS
1 SRTS Argent Rd/Rd 88 & Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 90 Pedestrian Crossings Argent Road Road 88 679,056$ 500,000$ 500,000
2 Lewis Street Underpass Demolition Lewis Street 1st Ave to Tacoma Ave 500,000$ 2,800,000$ 2,800,000
3 Rd 40 E Extension Road 40 East 'A' Street/ East Lewis Place 400,000$ 528,000$ 1,400,000$ 1,928,000
4 Ainsworth Ave Pavement Preservation Ainsworth Ave Oregon Ave/10th ave 400,000$ 1,682,000$ 1,682,000
5 Sylvester St Overpass Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Sylvester Street US 395 Overpass 340,660$ 659,340$ 3,229,340$ 3,888,680
6 Lewis Street Pavement Preservation Lewis Street US12/27th Ave 100,000$ 996,000$ 4,150,000$ 5,146,000
7 Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 76 Intersection Safety Enhancements Sandifur Parkway Road 76 31,000$ 300,000$ 1,700,000$ 2,000,000
8 Clark St Improvements Clark Street 10th St/2nd St 50,000$ 300,000$ 1,450,000$ 1,750,000
9 Rd 76 Overpass Road 76 Chapel Hill/Burden Blvd 2,659,000$ 3,100,000$ 8,000,000$ 12,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 30,759,000
10 Burns Rd/Rd 68 Intersection Improvements Burns Road Rd 68 150,000$ 350,000$ 1,500,000$ 2,000,000
11 Harris Rd Realignment Rd 103 Sandifur Pkwy 250,000$ 1,650,000$ 1,900,000
12 Burns Rd Extension - Missing link Burns Road Road 68/Rio Grande Lane 300,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,700,000$ 6,000,000
13 Burden Blvd/Rd 60 Intersection Improvements Burden Road Road 60 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000
14 City Wide Traffic Signal Improvements (Phase 3) Multiple Locations Multiple Locations 300,000$ 2,877,500$ 3,177,500
15 E Lewis St/Heritage Blvd Intersection Improvements E Lewis Street Heritage Blvd 400,000$ 1,500,000$ 500,000$ 2,400,000
16 South Rd 68 Pavement Preservation Court St I-182 700,000$ 1,500,000$ 2,200,000
17 Safe Routes to School Project TBD TBD 300,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,300,000
18 Road 44 FCID Canal Crossing Road 44 FCID Canal (North of Argent PI) 400,000$ 1,600,000$ 2,000,000
19 South 4th Ave (Festival Street Improvements) S 4th Avenue Lewis Street / Columbia Street 290,000$ 790,000$ 1,080,000
20 Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 84 Intersection Improvements Sandifur Parkway Road 84 350,000$ 1,900,000$ 2,250,000
21 Sacajawea Heritage Trail Levee Lowering Sacajawea Heritage Trail Road 54/Road 72 250,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ 3,250,000
22 Court & Rd 100 Intersection Improvements Court St Rd 100 500,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,500,000$ 6,000,000
23 Court Street/Road 60 Intersection Improvements Court St Rd 60 450,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,950,000
24 Sandifur Pkwy/Convention Dr Intersection Improvements Sandifur Parkway Convention Dr 410,000$ 1,900,000$ 2,310,000
25 I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Multiuse Pathway/Bridge Broadmoor Boulevard I-182 500,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 9,500,000
26 Columbia St Improvements Columbia Street 10th St/2nd St 390,000$ 1,190,000$ 1,580,000
27 Burden Rd/Rd 44 Intersection Improvements Burden Road Road 44 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000
28 Rd 40 East Pathway Road 40 East Sacajawea Park/East Lewis Place 540,000$ 590,000$ 840,000$ 1,970,000
29 Rainier Ave/Kartchner St Intersection Improvements Rainier Ave Kartchner 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,500,000$ 500,000$ 2,400,000
30 Court St Improvements- Ped/Bike Court Street Road 96/Harris Road 180,000$ 1,340,000$ 3,456,000$ 2,304,000$ 7,280,000
31 Rd 76 Improvements - Sandifur Pkwy to Cordero Dr Road 76 Sandifur Pkwy/Cordero Dr 300,000$ 1,700,000$ 2,000,000
32 N 4th Ave Pavement Preservation (I-182 to County Line) I-182 County Line (Glade Rd) 150,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,750,000
33 Argent Rd Widening (Phase 4) Argent Road Road 36/Road 44 1,180,000$ 2,360,000$ 2,360,000$ 5,900,000
34 Franklin County Irrigation District Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway N/A Road 100/Road 76 300,000$ 500,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,800,000
35 Rd 100 Widening Road 100 Court St/Chapel Hill Blvd 625,000$ 950,000$ 7,000,000$ 8,575,000
36 Shoreline Rd Realignment Shoreline Road Court/Burns Road 250,000$ 2,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 7,700,000$ 3,250,000
37 Burns Rd Extension to Glade Rd Burns Road "Road 44"/N Glade Road 2,400,000$ 3,400,000$ 3,000,000$ 24,750,000$ 8,800,000
38 Burden Rd/Madison Ave Intersection Improvements Burden Road Madison Ave 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000
39 Court St Safety Improvements Court Street Road 40/Road 68 110,000$ 340,000$ 450,000
40 James St Improvements James Street Oregon Ave/Frontier Lp 250,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,850,000
41 Harris Rd / Crescent Rd Overpass Harris Road Harris Road/Crescent Rd 1,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 47,600,000$ 4,000,000
42 Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 1) Lewis Street 2nd Ave/ 5th Ave 530,000$ 450,000$ 780,000$ 4,000,000$ 1,230,000
43 Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 2) Lewis Street 5th Ave/10th Ave 300,000$ 4,800,000$ 300,000
44 I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Improvements - Westbound Broadmoor Boulevard I-182 750,000$ 6,940,000$ 750,000
45 Court St Safety Improvements (Phase 2) Court Street Road 68/Road 96 680,000$ 680,000$ 5,100,000$ 1,360,000
PROGRAMS 161,526,180
46 Annual Pavement Preservation Multiple Locations Multiple Locations 701,000$ 715,500$ 737,000$ 759,200$ 782,000$ 805,500$ 4,500,200$
47 Ped/Bike Gap Program Multiple Locations Multiple Locations 105,000$ 110,250$ 115,763$ 121,551$ 127,628$ 580,191$
48 Neighborhood Traffic Calming program Multiple Locations Multiple Locations 110,250$ 115,763$ 121,551$ 127,628$ 134,010$ 609,201$
PLANS AND STUDIES 5,689,592$
49 Comprehensive Safety Action Plan(SS4A) 250,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$
50 Traffic Analysis for US 12 US 12 A /Tank Farm Road 1,530,000$ 1,530,000$ 3,060,000$
51 Interchange Feasibility Study on I-182 I-182 Multiple Existing Interchanges 200,000$ 250,000$ 450,000$
52 Rd 68/Taylor Flats Rd Intersection Study Road 68 Taylor Flats Rd/Columbia River 350,000$ 350,000$
53 Sign Reflectivity Analysis and Implementation 112,000$ 400,000$ 512,000$
4,522,000
15,265,340$ 31,439,590$ 31,323,013$ 31,731,513$ 29,487,179$ 32,491,138$ 171,737,772
Pa
g
e
7
3
o
f
2
2
8
2026-2031 TransportaƟon Improvement Plan (TIP)
Project DescripƟons
1
1. SRTS Argent Rd/Rd 88 & Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 90 Pedestrian Crossings
Curb extensions/bulb-outs, crossing advance stop bars, median refuge island, reduced curb radii, stop
signs, new marked crosswalks, rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB), lane width reducƟon, sidewalk
(5' +) with curb, pedestrian scale crossing illuminaƟon, ADA curb ramps.
2. Lewis Street Underpass DemoliƟon
This project will demolish the Lewis Street underpass, to 6 feet depth. Backfill aŌer demoliƟon will be
consistent with BNSF requirements.
3. Rd 40 E Extension
This project will extend Road 40 E, as a 1-lane northbound roadway north of A Street to connect to E
Lewis Place. This extension will eliminate a dead-end road at East Lewis Place. Signal adjustments,
striping and signage will be included in the scope of work.
4. Ainsworth Ave Pavement PreservaƟon
This project involves the overlay and restriping of Ainsworth Street/Avenue (SR397) from 10th Avenue to
the West and S Oregon Avenue to the East.
5. Sylvester St Overpass Pedestrian/Bicycle Access
Pedestrian/Bicyclist Overpass, Sidewalk (6'+) with curb, ADA Curb Ramps, Shared use Path/Trail, Bridge
(Part of Shared-use Path).
6. Lewis Street Pavement PreservaƟon
Mill and overlay enƟre exisƟng pavement area. Work includes cuƫng and patching failed areas (Alligator
cracking and spalling), taper mill at curved edges and then overlay with HMA. This allows for unchanged
elevaƟons at exisƟng curbs and addiƟonal structural secƟon for the majority of the roadway. ADA
upgrades will also be included as needed.
7. Sandifur Parkway & Road 76 IntersecƟon Safety Enhancement
This project will convert the two-way stop-controlled intersecƟon into a roundabout or signalized
intersecƟon and will include the following safety enhancements: ADA compliant ramps, marked
crosswalks, and push buƩon assemblies; Flashing yellow arrows (FYA) for all leŌ-turn movements;
emergency vehicle detecƟon; intersecƟon lighƟng. The project will also include design and construcƟon
of intelligent transportaƟon systems (ITS) connecƟons to the Sandifur Parkway/Road 68 intersecƟon for
interconnect capabiliƟes.
8. Clark St Improvements
This project will adjust Clark Street roadway configuraƟon to include vehicle travel lanes, bike lanes,
lighƟng, and bulb-outs at crossing locaƟons for increased pedestrian safety. Conceptual improvements
for this project are included in the adopted Downtown Masterplan.
9. Rd 76 Overpass
This project will extend Road 76 north from Chapel Hill Blvd to Burden Blvd by construcƟng an overpass
across I-182 to connect communiƟes north and south of the exisƟng interstate. This project will include
bicycle and pedestrian faciliƟes.
Page 74 of 228
2026-2031 TransportaƟon Improvement Plan (TIP)
Project DescripƟons
2
10. Burns Rd/ Rd 68 IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersecƟon of Burns Road and Road 68 and include any
necessary ADA improvements.
11. Harris Rd Realignment
This project will re-align Harris Road from Road 103 to Broadmoor Blvd to connect to Sandifur Parkway
and eliminate the exisƟng intersecƟon on Broadmoor.
12. Burns Rd Extension – Missing Link
This project will extend Burns Road, from Road 68 to Rio Grande Lane to improve connecƟvity and
access.
13. City Wide Traffic Signal Improvements (Phase 3)
This project will replace obsolete signal equipment with updated signal controllers, signal
equipment, opƟmized corridor Ɵming plans, vehicle detecƟon system and emergency vehicle
priority system. Pedestrian access will be upgraded to meet current ADA right of way
accessibility design guidelines for the signalized intersecƟons.
14. Burden Rd/Rd 60 IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersecƟon of Burden Road and Road 60 and include any
necessary ADA improvements.
15. E Lewis St/Heritage Blvd IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersecƟon of E Lewis Street and Heritage Blvd and
include any necessary ADA improvements.
16. South Rd 68 Pavement PreservaƟon (NEW)
This project involves the asphalt overlay and restriping of South Road 68 from Court Street to
eastbound on/off I-182 ramp.
17. Safe Routes to School Project
City will conƟnue to work closely with Pasco School District and parents/residents to idenƟfy
and prioriƟze projects that qualify for the state’s biannual Safe Routes to School Program, which
could include several locaƟons. This project typically involves providing sidewalks, enhancing
intersecƟon crossings, providing ADA curb ramps, providing school zone beacons or rectangular
rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs), and other safety related improvements within designated
school walking routes.
18. Road 44 FCID Canal Crossing (NEW)
Project along the west side of Road 44 to provide sidewalk connecƟvity to address exisƟng gap across
Franklin County IrrigaƟon Canal structure.
Page 75 of 228
2026-2031 TransportaƟon Improvement Plan (TIP)
Project DescripƟons
3
19. South 4th Ave (FesƟval Street Improvements)
This project will revise roadway configuraƟon and install sidewalk furnishings, lighƟng, street trees and
landscaping to create a FesƟval Street on South 4th Avenue from Lewis Street to Columbia Street. The
street will be able to be closed to motor vehicles during special events and further enhance the
completed Peanuts Park improvement project to allow for greater and more varied use of Peanuts Park
Plaza. Conceptual improvements for this project are included in the adopted Downtown Masterplan.
20. Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 84 IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersecƟon of Sandifur Parkway and Rd 84 and include any
necessary ADA improvements.
21. Sacajawea Heritage Trail Levee Lowering
This project will lower the levee and re-install a wider pathway for pedestrians and bicyclists from Road
52 to Road 72.
22. Court & Rd 100 IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will convert the exisƟng angled T-intersecƟon at Court St and Road 100 into a roundabout or
signalized intersecƟon, enhance traffic flow and safety in the area, and include any necessary ADA
improvements.
23. Court St/Rd 60 IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersecƟon of Court St and Road 60 and include any
necessary ADA improvements.
24. Sandifur Pkwy/ConvenƟon Drive IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersecƟon of Sandifur Parkway and ConvenƟon Drive and
include any necessary ADA improvements.
25. I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C MulƟuse Pathway/Bridge
Construct a ped/bike bridge with a mulƟ-use pathway across I-182 on the west side of the exisƟng
overpass, between ramp terminals.
26. Columbia St Improvements
This project will adjust Columbia Street roadway configuraƟon to include vehicle travel lanes, bike lanes,
lighƟng, and bulb-outs at crossing locaƟons for increased pedestrian safety. Conceptual improvements
for this project are included in the adopted Downtown Masterplan.
27. Burden Rd/Rd 44 IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersecƟon of Burden Road and Road 44 and include any
necessary ADA improvements.
28. Rd 40 East Pathway
This project will construct a mulƟ-use pathway along Road 40 E from ”A” Street to Sacajawea Park E.
Page 76 of 228
2026-2031 TransportaƟon Improvement Plan (TIP)
Project DescripƟons
4
29. Rainier Ave/Kartchner St IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersecƟon of Rainier Avenue and Kartchner Street at the
locaƟon of the US 395 SB On/Off Ramps and include any necessary ADA improvements.
30. Court Street Improvements – Ped/Bike
This project will improve Court Street from Road 96 to Harris Road to include bike and pedestrian
faciliƟes and permanent traffic calming features.
31. Rd 76 Improvements – Sandifur Pkwy to Cordero Dr
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersecƟon of Wrigley Drive and Road 76 and include any
necessary ADA improvements and reconfigure corridor between Sandifur Pkwy and Cordero Dr.
32. N 4th Ave Pavement PreservaƟon (I-182 to County Line) (NEW)
This project involves the asphalt overlay and restriping North 4th Ave from westbound on/off I-182 ramp
to County Line (Glade Road).
33. Argent Road Widening (Phase 4)
This project is Phase 4 of urban road improvements to Argent Road from Road 36 to Road 44.
Improvements include street widening to a three-lane secƟon, illuminaƟon, stormwater faciliƟes,
curb/guƩer, sidewalk, and related improvements.
34. Franklin County IrrigaƟon District Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway
This project will construct a mulƟ-use pathway along the piped irrigaƟon canal from Road 100 to Road
76.
35. Rd 100 Widening
This project will widen the Road 100 corridor to a 3-lane secƟon from W Court St to Chapel Hill Blvd.
IntersecƟon Improvements (such as turn lanes) will be evaluated and implemented as part of this
project.
36. Shoreline Rd Realignment
This project will provide for the realignment of Shoreline Road from Shoreline Court to Burns Road. The
realignment would be coordinated with the construcƟon of a park, to the west of the proposed roadway.
37. Burns Rd Extension to Glade Rd
This project will extend Burns Road from the approximate alignment of Road 44 to Glade Road.
38. Burden Rd/Madison Ave IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersecƟon of Burden Rd and Madison Ave and include any
necessary ADA improvements.
39. Court St Safety Improvements
This project will reconfigure Court Street from Road 40 to Road 68 to three lanes, with one lane in each
direcƟon and a center two-way-leŌ-turn lane and provides designated bike lanes in each direcƟon, and
pedestrian facility enhancements.
Page 77 of 228
2026-2031 TransportaƟon Improvement Plan (TIP)
Project DescripƟons
5
40. James St Improvements
This project is intended to provide pavement preservaƟon/reconstrucƟon of E James Street.
41. Harris Rd/Crescent Rd Overpass
This project will construct an overpass over I-182 to connect Harris Road and Crescent Road. This project
will connect the communiƟes north and south of I-182 and relieve some of the demand at Broadmoor
Boulevard and the I-182 interchange.
42. Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 1)
The project is intended to Ɵe the improvements made with the overpass project into those made under
the Peanuts Park improvement project. This project will include ADA improvements, crosswalks,
widened sidewalks, streetlights, re-striping and streetscape. NOTE: A revised scope is being considered
to minimize impacts to businesses during construcƟon.
43. Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 2)
This project will include ADA improvements, crosswalks, widened sidewalks, streetlights, re-striping and
streetscape between 5th Ave and 10th Ave. NOTE: A revised scope is being considered to minimize
impacts to businesses during construcƟon.
44. I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Improvements – Westbound
New mulƟ-lane roundabout at the I-182 westbound ramp terminal at Broadmoor Blvd on the north side
of I-182.
45. Court St Safety Improvements (Phase 2) (NEW)
This project will reconfigure Court Street from Road 68 to Road 96 to provide designated bike lanes in
each direcƟon, and pedestrian facility enhancements, as well as .
46. Annual Pavement PreservaƟon
The City has implemented an annual Pavement PreservaƟon Program to assess and maintain quality
streets within the City. The program includes crack seal, overlay, chip seal, etc. of city streets.
47. Ped/Bike Gap Program
This program idenƟfies and closes gaps in the pedestrian and bicycle network to enhance connecƟvity
and safety. Annually, locaƟons are selected with stakeholder and community input, prioriƟzing areas
based on traffic volumes, crash history, and proximity to schools, hospitals, transit, and essenƟal
services.
48. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
This program aims to enhance safety and livability in residenƟal areas by implemenƟng measures to
reduce vehicle speeds and discourage cut-through traffic. This program includes the implementaƟon of
traffic calming measures, such as: chicanes, islands, speed cushions, traffic circles, radar speed feedback
signs, and other calming devices to create a safer and more pleasant environment for pedestrians,
cyclists, and residents.
Page 78 of 228
2026-2031 TransportaƟon Improvement Plan (TIP)
Project DescripƟons
6
49. Comprehensive Safety AcƟon Plan (SS4A)
Pasco’s Comprehensive Safety AcƟon Plan (CSAP) will help idenƟfy the updated 2024 problem areas
through systemaƟc data collecƟon, recommending innovaƟve and appropriate countermeasures, and
prioriƟzing safety improvements that will benefit all users. The recommended soluƟons will aim to
reduce the frequency and severity of crashes, with an emphasis in reducing fataliƟes and serious
injuries.
50. Traffic Analysis for US 12
This project will consist of a traffic analysis for US 12 from the intersecƟons of A Street to Tank Farm
Road/Sacajawea Park Road. This study will be completed in partnership with WSDOT in search of
pracƟcal soluƟons for safety improvements at these locaƟons.
51. Interchange Feasibility Study
This study will evaluate the potenƟal for modifying exisƟng interchanges along I-182, in order to
improve traffic flow and safety. It serves as a planning document, defining "purpose and need" and
conducƟng traffic analysis to coordinate potenƟal soluƟons with DOT and FHWA.
52. Rd 68/Taylor Flats Rd IntersecƟon Study (NEW)
This study will consist of a traffic and safety analysis for the intersecƟon of Road 68 and Taylor Flats
Road. The intersecƟon has split ownership with Franklin County.
53. Sign ReflecƟvity Analysis & ImplementaƟon
The project will evaluate up to 500 stop signs that are near the end of their service life
(older than 12 years) and upgrade the retro-reflecƟvity as needed. The project will also include the
evaluaƟon of the stop sign size and may increase stop signs from 30” to 36” signs. In addiƟon, red
reflecƟve strips will be added to the stop sign poles as warranted.
Page 79 of 228
2026-2031 TransportaƟon Improvement Plan (TIP)
Project DescripƟons
7
REMOVED PROJECTS
1. Burns Rd/Broadmoor Blvd IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersecƟon of Burns Road and Broadmoor Blvd. Sidewalks
and any necessary ADA improvements will be included.
2. Sandifur Pkwy Extension
This project will extend Sandifur Parkway from the vicinity of Road 103 to Road 108. Provisions for future
traffic signals will be included at the intersecƟon of Sandifur and Road 105. A roundabout will be
constructed at the intersecƟon of Sandifur Parkway and Road 108.
3. Sandifur Pkwy/Broadmoor Blvd IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will improve the intersecƟon of Sandifur Parkway and Broadmoor Boulevard. AddiƟonally,
Broadmoor Blvd. widening will be included as part of this project extending north up to Burns Road.
Provisions for a future traffic signal at Buckingham Dr are considered in this project.
4. Road 108 Extension
This project will construct a 2-lanes road from Harris Road to Sandifur Parkway.
5. W 'A' St/6th Ave Pedestrian Crossing
Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons, curb extensions, illuminaƟon, signing, pavement markings,
and curb ramps.
6. Commercial Ave/Kartchner St IntersecƟon Improvements
This project will install a traffic signal at the intersecƟon of Commercial Ave and Kartchner St at the
locaƟon of the US 395 NB On/Off Ramps and include any necessary ADA improvements.
7. Citywide Injury MinimizaƟon & Speed Management ImplementaƟon
Conduct Citywide speed data collecƟon and study. Install speed limit signing and radar speed feedback
signs.
Page 80 of 228
Pa
g
e
8
1
o
f
2
2
8
Engagement & Comment Report:
Transportation & Capital Improvement Plans
Engagement Summary
The City of Pasco's Transportation & Capital Improvement Plans bilingual outreach
efforts, conducted between April 8 and May 12, 2025, demonstrated effective use of
diverse communication tactics to inform and engage residents. The campaign garnered
attention through traditional and digital media, with 5 traditional media stories and one
city-placed story. The dedicated webpage for CIP & TIP attracted 171 visits and 5
formal comment submissions.
The press release and all graphics were translated and posted in Spanish and English.
Webpage and social media captions are automatically translated per the user's browser
language settings. Spanish translation was available at both meetings but not utilized.
Media
Press release sent: 4/9/25
Stories generated: 5
KNDU:
April 8: Pasco open house events to discuss transportation and
infrastructure plans | News | nbcrightnow.com
April 21: Pasco residents weigh in on six-year transportation
improvement plan | News | nbcrightnow.com
May 7: Pasco's infrastructure plans unveiled at Gesa Stadium open
house event | News | nbcrightnow.com
KEPR:
A reporter attended the May 7 event and interviewed Public Works
Director Maria Serra, but an online article could not be found.
KVEW:
A reporter attended the April 21 event, and interviewed Public
Works Deputy Director Mary Heather live on the 6PM news:
https://youtu.be/k_qKGc4K1YM?feature=shared&t=266
City-initiated media placements:
KONA interviews: 4/21/25
Website
CIP & TIP webpage hits: 171
Front Page “News Flash” story:
Opt-In push notice subscribers: 211
Comment forms online from 4/1/25 to 5/11/25:
Total Submissions:
TIP: Three
Page 82 of 228
CIP: Two
Comment reports attached
Community Meetings
Outreach Meeting Wednesday, May 7th at GESA Stadium
Outreach Meeting Monday, April 21st at City Hall
Social Media
Social media posts appeared on Facebook, Instagram, and NextDoor:
Total Impressions: 4,633
Total Shares: 8, 7
Event Attendance: 18 people RSVP’ed
Total Comments: 15
5/6 Post:
Page 83 of 228
4/21 Meeting Video Post:
Page 84 of 228
Pa
g
e
8
5
o
f
2
2
8
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 2, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 6/9/25
FROM: Griselda Garcia, Interim Director
Finance
SUBJECT: Ordinance - 2025 Issuance Bond for LID No. 152 (5 minute staff
presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Ordinance
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Sewer Fund - $5,764,435
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
benefitting of means a assisting (LIDs) Districts Improvement Local are
properties by providing a means to finance needed capital improvements
through the formation of special assessment districts.
In March 23 2022, Local Improvement District (LID) No. 152, East UGA
Expansion Sewer Local Improvement District, was established via Council
approval financial the ordinance The allowed No. Ordinance of 4592.
mechanism to support construction of sewer mains and lift station within the
UGA expansion east of Road 68.
During the construction phase of the project, interim project financing was
accomplished by means of a Bond Anticipation Note (BAN) as authorized by
Ordinance No. 4704. Proceeds from the BAN of $20,060,000 were received in
March 2024. Interest payments totaling $1.4 million are due within the term of
this 2025 interim financing instrument. This Note matures September 1,
requiring payment of $20,060,000.
Page 86 of 228
Construction was completed in phases with the last phase accepted by Council
in November 2024. Overall construction costs were less than anticipated during
the issuance of the Bond Anticipation Note, resulting in $318,934 of unspent
bond proceeds which will be used for repayment. Further the construction
project require which growth future would capacity reserve produced for
proportionate payments for connection. This reserve capacity is not allocated
to the landowners and requires City Contribution in the amount of $5,764,435
to be funded by the Sewer Fund. Future connection payments will reimburse
the Sewer Fund for this initial contribution.
The final assessment roll was confirmed by Ordinance No. 4762 on March 3,
2025. This confirmation initiated the initial billing process, which provides Local
Improvement District (LID) property owners a 30-day interest-free window to
prepay all, part, or none of their assessment. Following the close of this
prepayment period, the remaining unpaid assessments represent the amount
to be financed through the issuance of long-term bonds. Accordingly, the total
amount exceed of balance the not unpaid issued be to bonds of will
assessments, which totals $12,678,906.
V. DISCUSSION:
At their meeting of March 3, 2025, Council approved Ordinance No. 4762,
Local Improvement District No. 152, setting the final assessment amount,
$13,838,683. provided owners property were final Following assessment,
notice of a 30-day interest free prepayment period. The purpose of the
prepayment period is to allow for payment of any or all outstanding
assessments prior to issuance of debt. During the prepayment period, ending
May 2, 2025, payments in the amount of $1,159,777 were received. The
remaining unpaid assessments in LID No. 152 are $12,678,906.
In recent cases, such as LID 150 and LID 151, the final assessment amounts
were relatively low, allowing the City to finance in-house using available
reserve balances from sources such as the Equipment Replacement Fund.
This approach proved more cost-effective by avoiding external debt issuance
costs. However, due to the significantly higher funding requirement in this case,
the City does not have the capacity to finance the project internally, and
external bond issuance is necessary.
To facilitate this process, the City is working with its team, which includes bond
counsel, a municipal financial advisor, and a bond underwriter. The goal is to
complete the bond sale in early August to ensure proceeds are available by
early September, in time to repay the maturing Bond Anticipation Note. The
proposed bonds will have a 17-year term with annual payments.
Page 87 of 228
This ordinance authorizes staff to proceed with the bond issuance process and
establishes key parameters. Specifically, the bonds must carry a fixed interest
rate and shall not exceed a maximum rate of 6.50%.
Page 88 of 228
FG: 103577414.3
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, providing for the
issuance of not to exceed $12,678,905.87 aggregate principal amount of local
improvement district bonds to provide a portion of the funds necessary to finance
public improvements in Local Improvement District No. 152 (“LID No. 152”)
and pay the costs of issuance of the Bonds; fixing or setting parameters with
respect to certain terms and covenants of the bonds; appointing the City’s
designated representative to approve the final terms of the sale of the bonds;
fixing the interest rate on assessments within LID No. 152; and providing for
other related matters.
PASSED: ________ __, 2025
This document prepared by:
Foster Garvey P.C.
1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3000
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 447-4400
Page 89 of 228
-i-
FG: 103577414.3
TABLE OF CONTENTS*
Section 1 . Findings and Determinations .................................................................................. 1
Section 2 . Definitions............................................................................................................... 2
Section 3 . Authorization of Bonds ........................................................................................... 5
Section 4 . Description of the Bonds; Appointment of Designated Representative ................. 5
Section 5 . Bond Registrar; Registration and Transfer of Bonds .............................................. 6
Section 6 . Form and Execution of Bonds ................................................................................ 7
Section 7 . Payment of Bonds ................................................................................................... 7
Section 8 . Funds and Accounts ................................................................................................ 7
Section 9 . Maturity; Redemption Provisions and Purchase of Bonds ..................................... 9
Section 10 . Pledge of Assessment Payments ........................................................................... 10
Section 11 . Tax Covenants. ..................................................................................................... 10
Section 12 . Refunding or Defeasance of the Bonds ................................................................ 11
Section 13 . Sale and Delivery of the Bonds. ........................................................................... 11
Section 14 . Official Statement; Continuing Disclosure ........................................................... 11
Section 15 . Supplemental and Amendatory Ordinances.......................................................... 12
Section 16 . Fixing Interest Rate on Assessments .................................................................... 12
Section 17 . General Authorization and Ratification ................................................................ 12
Section 18 . Severability ........................................................................................................... 13
Section 19 . Conflicts with Pasco Municipal Code................................................................... 13
Section 20 . Effective Date of Ordinance ................................................................................. 13
Exhibit A Parameters for Final Terms
Exhibit B Form of Undertaking to Provide Continuing Disclosure
*The cover page, table of contents and section headings of this ordinance are for convenience of
reference only, and shall not be used to resolve any question of interpretation of this ordinance.
Page 90 of 228
-1-
FG: 103577414.3
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, providing for the
issuance of not to exceed $12,678,905.87 aggregate principal amount of local
improvement district bonds to provide a portion of the funds necessary to finance
public improvements in Local Improvement District No. 152 (“LID No. 152”)
and pay the costs of issuance of the Bonds; fixing or setting parameters with
respect to certain terms and covenants of the bonds; appointing the City’s
designated representative to approve the final terms of the sale of the bonds;
fixing the interest rate on assessments within LID No. 152; and providing for
other related matters.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, HEREBY
ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings and Determinations. The City makes the findings and
determinations set forth below. Capitalized terms have the meanings given in Section 2.
(a) Authority and Description of Improvements. By Ordinance No. 4592, passed on
May 23, 2022, the City created LID No. 152 for the purpose of carrying out the Improvements
and authorizing the issuance of local improvement district bonds to finance a portion of the costs
of the Improvements by repaying interim financing, reimbursing the City for Improvements
costs, making a deposit to the City’s Guaranty Fund, and paying the costs of issuance of the
Bonds.
(b) The Notes. Pending the issuance of the Bonds, the City passed Ordinance No.
4704 authorizing the issuance of the City’s Local Improvement District No. 152 Bond
Anticipation Notes, 2024 (the “Notes”), and the Notes were sold and delivered to D.A. Davidson
& Co. (the “Underwriter”), for the purpose of providing interim financing to pay a portion of the
costs of the Improvements. The Notes mature on September 1, 2025, and the City reserved the
right to redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, on any date on or after March 1, 2025, at a price
equal to the stated principal amount to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of
redemption.
(c) Redemption of the Notes. On March 3, 2025, the City Council passed Ordinance
No. 4762, confirming the final assessment roll for LID No. 152 and authorizing the collection of
the special assessments levied within LID No. 152. The notice of collection of assessments was
published first on April 2, 2025, and subsequently on April 9, 2025, and the last day for
prepayment of assessments without penalties or interest was May 2, 2025. The total amount of
Bonds to be issued will not exceed the balance of assessments remaining unpaid after the
expiration of the 30-day prepayment period ($12,678,905.87). The Notes shall be redeemed with
funds to be provided from the following sources in the respective amounts as determined by the
Finance Director: (i) unspent proceeds of the Notes held in the Local Improvement Fund created
and established by Ordinance No. 4592 not required for payment of the costs of the
Improvements ordered by Ordinance No. 4592 to be constructed in respect of LID No. 152; (ii)
Page 91 of 228
-2-
FG: 103577414.3
proceeds of the Notes held in the City’s Guaranty Fund that are in excess of the minimum
balance required to be held therein pursuant to chapter 35.54 RCW; (iii) prepaid assessments
received by the City prior to the expiration of the 30-day prepayment period for LID No. 152;
(iv) proceeds of the Bonds; and (v) as authorized by RCW 35.45.180, a contribution by the City
of funds available in the City’s Sewer Fund in an amount equal to the difference between (A) the
total amount of funds required to redeem the Notes on their redemption date and pay costs of
issuance of the Bonds, and (B) the sum of the respective available amounts described in the
foregoing clauses (i) through (iv) to be used to redeem the Notes and pay costs of issuance of the
Bonds, which contribution the City Council finds and declares to be in the public interest and in
the best interests of the City.
(d) The Bonds. For the purpose of providing a portion of the funds necessary to
redeem the Notes and pay the costs of issuance of the Bonds, the City Council finds that it is in
the best interests of the City to issue and sell the Bonds to the Purchaser, pursuant to the terms
set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract as approved by the City’s Designated Representative
consistent with this ordinance. The Bonds shall be paid from and secured by the unpaid
assessments made for LID No. 152 that are now required to be paid in 15 equal annual
installment payments of principal and interest and the Guaranty Fund.
Section 2. Definitions. As used in this ordinance, the following capitalized terms
shall have the following meanings:
(a) “Authorized Denomination” means $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof within
an estimated redemption date within a Series, except that if the aggregate principal amount of the
Series of the Bonds is not an integral multiple of $5,000, then the first Bond of that Series shall
be in such principal amount as the Designated Representative shall determine.
(b) “Beneficial Owner” means, with respect to a Bond, the owner of any beneficial
interest in that Bond.
(c) “Bond” means each bond issued pursuant to and for the purposes provided in this
ordinance.
(d) “Bond Counsel” means the firm of Foster Garvey P.C., its successor, or any other
attorney or firm of attorneys selected by the City with a nationally recognized standing as bond
counsel in the field of municipal finance.
(e) “Bond Purchase Contract” means an offer to purchase a Series of the Bonds,
setting forth certain terms and conditions of the issuance of that Series that is accepted by the
Designated Representative on behalf of the City pursuant to this ordinance.
(f) “Bond Register” means the books or records maintained by the Bond Registrar for
the purpose of identifying ownership of each Bond.
(g) “Bond Registrar” means the Fiscal Agent, the Finance Director or any successor
bond registrar selected by the Designated Representative in accordance with Exhibit A(ix).
Page 92 of 228
-3-
FG: 103577414.3
(h) “City” means the City of Pasco, Washington, a municipal corporation duly
organized and existing under the laws of the State.
(i) “City Council” means the legislative authority of the City, as duly and regularly
constituted from time to time.
(j) “City Manager” means the duly appointed and acting City Manager or Interim
City Manager or such other officer of the City who succeeds to substantially all of the
responsibilities of that office.
(k) “Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and
applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
(l) “Designated Representative” means the officer of the City appointed in Section 4
of this ordinance to serve as the City’s designated representative in accordance with RCW
39.46.040(2).
(m) “Designated Representative Certificate” means the certificate executed by the
Designated Representative on the sale date authorizing the Final Terms of each Series of the
Bonds.
(n) “DTC” means The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, or its
nominee.
(o) “Final Terms” means the terms and conditions for the sale of a Series of the
Bonds including, but not limited to, the amount, date or dates, denominations, interest rate or
rates (or mechanism for determining interest rate or rates), payment dates, final maturity,
redemption rights, price, and other terms or covenants.
(p) “Finance Director” means the duly appointed and acting Finance Director or
Interim Finance Director or such other officer of the City who succeeds to substantially all of the
responsibilities of that office.
(q) “Fiscal Agent” means the fiscal agent of the State, as the same may be designated
by the State from time to time.
(r) “Government Obligations” has the meaning given in RCW 39.53.010, as now in
effect or as may hereafter be amended.
(s) “Guaranty Fund” or “Local Improvement Guaranty Fund” means the Local
Improvement Guaranty Fund of the City previously created pursuant to Pasco Municipal Code
3.90.010.
(t) “Improvements” means has the meaning provided in Ordinance No. 4592,
including without limitation, sanitary sewer construction, including site grading, manholes, a lift
station and force mains, and sewer gravity pipelines, casings, and appurtenances in the City’s
East Urban Growth Area (UGA) Expansion Area ordered in respect of LID No. 152. For
purposes of this ordinance, costs of the Improvements include all costs of constructing the
Page 93 of 228
-4-
FG: 103577414.3
Improvements and all other costs permitted for inclusion under RCW 35.44.020 and related
statutes, including without limitation, all costs for legal, financial, and appraisal services and any
other expenses incurred by the City on behalf of or in the formation of LID No. 152, or in
connection with such construction or improvement and in the financing thereof, including the
costs of issuance of the Bonds.
(u) “Improvement Fund means the Local Improvement created and held by the City
by Ordinance No. 4592 and used for the purpose of carrying out the Improvements.
(v) “Interest Payment Date” means each annual date on which interest on a Bond is
due and payable, as set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract.
(w) “Issue Date” means, with respect to a Bond, the date of initial issuance and
delivery of that Bond to the Purchaser in exchange for the purchase price of that Bond.
(x) “Letter of Representations” means the Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations
between the City and DTC, dated August 31, 1998, as it may be amended from time to time, or
any successor or substitute letter relating to the operations procedures of the Securities
Depository.
(y) “LID Bond Fund” means the Local Improvement Fund, District No. 152 of the
City created for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds.
(z) “LID No. 152” means Local Improvement District No. 152, established by
Ordinance No. 4592 of the City, passed May 23, 2022, for the purpose of carrying out the
Improvements.
(aa) “MSRB” means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board.
(bb) “Notes” means the City’s outstanding Local Improvement District No. 152 Bond
Anticipation Notes, 2024.
(cc) “Owner” means, without distinction, the Registered Owner and the Beneficial
Owner.
(dd) “Purchaser” means the person, bank, corporation, firm, association, partnership,
trust, the City or other legal entity or group of entities selected by the Designated Representative
to serve as underwriter or purchaser for a negotiated sale of a Series of the Bonds.
(ee) “Rating Agency” means each nationally recognized rating agency then
maintaining a rating on the Bonds at the request of the City, if any.
(ff) “Record Date” means the Bond Registrar’s close of business on the 15th day of
the month preceding an Interest Payment Date. With respect to redemption of a Bond prior to its
maturity, the Record Date shall mean the Bond Registrar’s close of business on the date on
which the Bond Registrar sends the notice of redemption in accordance with Section 9.
Page 94 of 228
-5-
FG: 103577414.3
(gg) “Registered Owner” means, with respect to a Bond, the person in whose name
that Bond is registered on the Bond Register. For so long as the City utilizes the book–entry
system for the Bonds under the Letter of Representations, Registered Owner shall mean the
Securities Depository.
(hh) “Rule 15c2-12” means Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the SEC under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(ii) “SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
(jj) “Securities Depository” means DTC, any successor thereto, any substitute
securities depository selected by the City that is qualified under applicable laws and regulations
to provide the services proposed to be provided by it, or the nominee of any of the foregoing.
(kk) “Series of the Bonds” or “Series” means a series of the Bonds issued pursuant to
this ordinance.
(ll) “State” means the State of Washington.
(mm) “System of Registration” means the system of registration for the City’s bonds and
other obligations set forth in Ordinance No. 2845 of the City.
(nn) “Tax-Exempt Bonds” means any Bond, the interest on which is intended as of its
Issue Date to be excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes.
(oo) “Undertaking” means the undertaking to provide continuing disclosure entered
into pursuant to Section 14 of this ordinance.
Section 3. Authorization of Bonds. The City is authorized to issue the Bonds to
provide the funds necessary to pay or reimburse a portion of the costs of the Improvements,
including without limitation redeeming the Notes and paying the costs of issuance of the Bonds.
The costs of issuance of the Bonds shall include, but not be limited to, the underwriter’s
discount, the underwriter’s counsel fee, the bond counsel fee and the financial advisor fee. The
Bonds shall evidence indebtedness in an amount not to exceed the total amount on the
assessment roll for LID No. 152 remaining uncollected after the expiration of the 30 day
prepayment period, as further described in Exhibit A attached to this ordinance and incorporated
by this reference.
Section 4. Description of the Bonds; Appointment of Designated Representative. The
City Manager and the Finance Director, each acting independently, is appointed as the
Designated Representative of the City and is authorized and directed to conduct the sale of the
Bonds, in one or more Series bearing the same Issue Date, in the manner and upon the terms
deemed most advantageous to the City, and to approve the Final Terms of the Bonds, with such
additional terms and covenants as the Designated Representative deems advisable, within the
parameters set forth in Exhibit A.
Page 95 of 228
-6-
FG: 103577414.3
Section 5. Bond Registrar; Registration and Transfer of Bonds.
(a) Registration of Bonds. Each Bond shall be issued only in registered form as to
both principal and interest, and the ownership of each Bond shall be recorded on the Bond
Register.
(b) Bond Registrar; Duties. The Designated Representative shall appoint the Bond
Registrar for each Series of the Bonds in accordance with Exhibit A. The Bond Registrar shall
keep, or cause to be kept, sufficient books for the registration and transfer of the Bonds, which
shall be open to inspection by the City at all times. The Bond Registrar is authorized, on behalf
of the City, to authenticate and deliver Bonds transferred or exchanged in accordance with the
provisions of the Bonds and this ordinance, to serve as the City’s paying agent for the Bonds and
to carry out all of the Bond Registrar’s powers and duties under this ordinance and the System of
Registration. The Bond Registrar shall be responsible for its representations contained in the
Bond Registrar’s Certificate of Authentication on each Bond. The Bond Registrar may become
an Owner with the same rights it would have if it were not the Bond Registrar and, to the extent
permitted by law, may act as depository for and permit any of its officers or directors to act as
members of, or in any other capacity with respect to, any committee formed to protect the rights
of Owners.
(c) Bond Register; Transfer and Exchange. The Bond Register shall contain the name
and mailing address of each Registered Owner and the principal amount and number of each
Bond held by each Registered Owner. A Bond surrendered to the Bond Registrar may be
exchanged for a Bond or Bonds of an equal aggregate principal amount and of the same Series,
interest rate, estimated redemption date and maturity. A Bond may be transferred only if
endorsed in the manner provided thereon and surrendered to the Bond Registrar. Any exchange
or transfer shall be without cost to the Owner or transferee. The Bond Registrar shall not be
obligated to exchange any Bond or transfer registered ownership during the period between the
applicable Record Date and the next upcoming interest payment or redemption date.
(d) Securities Depository; Book-Entry Only Form. The Designated Representative
may determine whether each Series of the Bonds is to be issued in certificated or fully
immobilized book-entry only form. If a Series of the Bonds is issued in book-entry form, DTC
shall be appointed as initial Securities Depository. Each Bond of such Series initially shall be
registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee of DTC. Each Bond registered in the name
of the Securities Depository shall be held in accordance with the provisions of the Letter of
Representations. Registered ownership of any Bond registered in the name of the Securities
Depository may not be transferred except: (i) to any successor Securities Depository; (ii) to any
substitute Securities Depository appointed by the City; or (iii) to any person if the Series of the
Bonds is no longer to be held in book-entry only form. Upon the resignation of the Securities
Depository, or upon a termination of the services of the Securities Depository by the City, the
City may appoint a substitute Securities Depository. If (i) the Securities Depository resigns and
the City does not appoint a substitute Securities Depository, or (ii) the City terminates the
services of the Securities Depository, the Series of the Bonds no longer shall be held in book-
entry only form and the registered ownership of each Bond of such Series may be transferred to
any person as provided in this ordinance. Neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall have any
obligation to participants of any Securities Depository or the persons for whom they act as
Page 96 of 228
-7-
FG: 103577414.3
nominees regarding accuracy of any records maintained by the Securities Depository or its
participants. Neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be responsible for any notice that is
permitted or required to be given to a Registered Owner except such notice as is required to be
given by the Bond Registrar to the Securities Depository.
Section 6. Form and Execution of Bonds.
(a) Form of Bonds; Signatures and Seal. Each Bond shall be prepared in a form
consistent with the provisions of this ordinance and State law. Each Bond shall be signed by the
Mayor and the City Clerk, either or both of whose signatures may be manual or in facsimile, and
the seal of the City or a facsimile reproduction thereof shall be impressed or printed thereon. If
any officer whose manual or facsimile signature appears on a Bond ceases to be an officer of the
City authorized to sign bonds before the Bond bearing his or her manual or facsimile signature is
authenticated by the Bond Registrar, or issued or delivered by the City, that Bond nevertheless
may be authenticated, issued and delivered and, when authenticated, issued and delivered, shall
be as binding on the City as though that person had continued to be an officer of the City
authorized to sign bonds. Any Bond also may be signed on behalf of the City by any person who,
on the actual date of signing of the Bond, is an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds,
although he or she did not hold the required office on its Issue Date.
(b) Authentication. Only a Bond bearing a Certificate of Authentication in
substantially the following form, manually signed by the Bond Registrar, shall be valid or
obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of this ordinance: “Certificate Of
Authentication. This Bond is one of the fully registered City of Pasco, Washington, Local
Improvement District No. 152 Bonds.” The authorized signing of a Certificate of Authentication
shall be conclusive evidence that the Bond so authenticated has been duly executed,
authenticated and delivered and is entitled to the benefits of this ordinance.
Section 7. Payment of Bonds. Principal of and interest on each Bond shall be payable
in lawful money of the United States of America solely out of the LID Bond Fund or from the
Local Improvement Guaranty Fund of the City. Principal of and interest on each Bond registered
in the name of the Securities Depository is payable in the manner set forth in the Letter of
Representations. Interest on each Bond not registered in the name of the Securities Depository is
payable by electronic transfer on each Interest Payment Date, or by check or draft of the Bond
Registrar mailed on such Interest Payment Date to the Registered Owner at the address appearing
on the Bond Register on the Record Date. However, the City is not required to make electronic
transfers except pursuant to a request by a Registered Owner in writing received at least ten days
prior to the Record Date and at the sole expense of the Registered Owner. Principal of each Bond
not registered in the name of the Securities Depository is payable upon presentation and
surrender of the Bond by the Registered Owner to the Bond Registrar. The Bonds are not subject
to acceleration under any circumstances.
Section 8. Funds and Accounts.
(a) LID Bond Fund; Deposit of Assessments. The LID Bond Fund has been
previously created as a special fund of the City for the sole purpose of paying principal of and
interest on the Bonds. All collections pertaining to payments of assessments on the assessment
Page 97 of 228
-8-
FG: 103577414.3
roll of LID No. 152, including prepayments, installment payments, and interest and penalties
thereon, shall be deposited in the LID Bond Fund. Prior to the Issue Date, any money on hand in
the LID Bond Fund may be used to pay or reimburse costs of the Improvements, may be
transferred to the Guaranty Fund, or may be retained therein for the payment of principal of or
interest on the Bonds, as determined by the Finance Director. After the Issue Date, money on
hand in the LID Bond Fund shall be used solely to pay interest on the Bonds, to redeem
outstanding Bonds in accordance with Section 9, or to pay for costs of collecting delinquent
assessments. Until needed for such purposes, the City may invest money in the LID Bond Fund
temporarily in any legal investment, and the investment earnings shall be retained in the LID
Bond Fund and used for the purposes of that fund.
(b) Improvement Fund; Deposit of Bond Proceeds. Proceeds received from the sale
and delivery of each Series of the Bonds in an amount sufficient, together with (i) unspent
proceeds of the Notes held in the Local Improvement Fund created and established by Ordinance
No. 4592 not required for payment of the costs of the Improvements ordered by Ordinance No.
4592 to be constructed in respect of LID No. 152; (ii) proceeds of the Notes held in the City’s
Guaranty Fund that are in excess of the minimum balance required to be held therein pursuant to
chapter 35.54 RCW; (iii) prepaid assessments received by the City prior to the expiration of the
30-day prepayment period for LID No. 152; and (iv) as authorized by RCW 35.45.180, a
contribution by the City of funds available in the City’s Sewer Fund in an amount equal to the
difference between (A) the total amount of funds required to redeem the Notes on their
redemption date and pay costs of issuance of the Bonds, and (B) the sum of the respective
available amounts described in the foregoing clauses (i) through (iii) to be used to redeem the
Notes and pay costs of issuance of the Bonds (which contribution the City Council finds and
declares to be in the public interest and in the best interests of the City), shall be paid into or
allocated to the Improvement Fund and used to redeem the Notes and pay the costs of issuance
of the Bonds. Until needed for such purposes, the City may invest the principal proceeds of the
Bonds temporarily in any legal investment, and the investment earnings shall be deposited in the
LID Bond Fund. Earnings subject to a federal tax or rebate requirement may be withdrawn from
any such fund or account and used for those tax or rebate purposes. Any proceeds of Bonds
remaining in the Improvement Fund after paying the costs of the Improvements, the costs of
issuing the Bonds, and for the purposes set forth in this section, or after the City Council has
determined that the expenditure of such bond proceeds for those purposes is no longer necessary
or appropriate, may be used to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds consistent with
applicable law.
(c) Guaranty Fund. On the Issue Date, there shall be held on deposit in the Guaranty
Fund an amount not less than the balance required to be maintained therein under this subsection.
For so long as any of the Bonds remain outstanding, the City shall take such actions as may be
necessary, consistent with chapters 35.45 and 35.54 RCW and other applicable state law and
applicable requirements of the Code, to maintain a minimum balance in the Guaranty Fund equal
to 10 percent of the principal amount of all bonds, notes and other obligations secured by the
Guaranty Fund, provided, that for the purpose of this calculation, the principal amount of bonds,
notes and other obligations secured by the Guaranty Fund shall be reduced by the amount then
on deposit in the respective debt service funds held by the City for payment and redemption of
such bonds, notes and other obligations.
Page 98 of 228
-9-
FG: 103577414.3
In connection with the City’s annual budget preparation, the Finance Director shall
review the amount on deposit in the Guaranty Fund, the amount of delinquent installment
payments (including interest thereon) of local improvement district assessments secured by the
Guaranty Fund, and the respective amounts reasonably expected to be recovered from
foreclosure proceedings pursuant to chapter 35.50 RCW or other applicable law. Based on that
review the City shall, pursuant to RCW 35.54.060 and subject to applicable state law and
constitutional limitations and applicable requirements of the Code, provide for the levy of a sum
sufficient, together with other sources of the Guaranty Fund, to maintain the minimum balance
described in the preceding paragraph, and to provide for all payments reasonably expected to be
made out of the Guaranty Fund.
Interest and earnings from the Guaranty Fund shall be retained within the Guaranty Fund.
The Finance Director may establish subaccounts within the Guaranty Fund from time to time as
the Finance Director deems necessary or desirable for purposes of accounting for the investment
of money therein. Money in the Guaranty Fund shall be used solely for the payment of bonds,
notes and other obligations secured by such fund and as otherwise set forth in chapter 35.54
RCW and other applicable law, except that any investment earnings that are subject to a federal
tax or rebate requirement may be withdrawn from the Guaranty Fund and used for those tax or
rebate purposes.
Section 9. Maturity; Redemption Provisions and Purchase of Bonds.
(a) Maturity. All Bonds shall bear a maturity date approved by the Designated
Representative in accordance with Section 4.
(b) Redemption Provisions. The City shall call Bonds for redemption in whole or in
part in Authorized Denominations by Series and, within each Series, on each Interest Payment
Date when there is money in the LID Bond Fund from assessment payments (including principal,
interest, and penalties thereon) sufficient to pay the Bond (or portion thereof) so called over and
above the amount required for the payment of the interest payable on all unpaid Bonds on that
Interest Payment Date. Bonds shall be redeemed at a redemption price equal to the stated
principal amount to be redeemed plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date. At the
option of the City in its sole discretion, Bonds may be called and paid in whole or in part on an
Interest Payment Date from other money of the City legally available therefor and deposited in
the Bond Fund on or after the dates set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract. Nothing in the
preceding sentence requires payment from any source other than the funds pledged in Section 10
hereof.
(c) Selection of Bonds for Redemption; Partial Redemption. For so long as a Series of
the Bonds is registered in the name of the Securities Depository, if less than all of the principal
amount of Bonds with the same estimated redemption date is to be redeemed, the Securities
Depository shall select the proportion of those Bonds to be redeemed in accordance with the
Letter of Representations. If a Series of the Bonds is not registered in the name of the Securities
Depository, the Bond Registrar shall, unless otherwise specified in the Bond Purchase Contract,
select the proportion of those Bonds with the same estimated redemption date to be redeemed
randomly in such manner as the Bond Registrar shall determine. All or a portion of the principal
amount of any Bond that is to be redeemed may be redeemed in any Authorized Denomination.
Page 99 of 228
-10-
FG: 103577414.3
If less than all of the outstanding principal amount of any Bond is redeemed, upon surrender of
that Bond to the Bond Registrar, there shall be issued to the Registered Owner, without charge, a
new Bond, bearing the same Series, estimated redemption date and interest rate, in the aggregate
principal amount to remain outstanding.
(d) Notice of Redemption. Notice of redemption of each Bond registered in the name
of the Securities Depository shall be given in accordance with the Letter of Representations.
Notice of redemption of each other Bond, unless waived by the Registered Owner, shall be given
by the Bond Registrar not less than 15 nor more than 45 days prior to the date fixed for
redemption by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to the Registered Owner at the address appearing
on the Bond Register on the Record Date. The requirements of the preceding sentence shall be
satisfied when notice has been mailed as so provided, whether or not it is actually received by an
Owner. In addition, the redemption notice shall be mailed or sent electronically within the same
period to the MSRB (if required under the Undertaking), to each Rating Agency, and to such
other persons and with such additional information as the Finance Director shall determine, but
these additional mailings shall not be a condition precedent to the redemption of any Bond.
(e) Rescission of Redemption Notice. In the case of any redemption, the notice of
redemption may state that the City retains the right to rescind the redemption notice by giving a
notice of rescission to the affected Registered Owner(s) at any time on or prior to the date fixed
for redemption. Any notice of redemption that is so rescinded shall be of no effect, and each
Bond for which a notice of redemption has been rescinded shall remain outstanding.
(f) Effect of Redemption. Interest on the principal portion of each Bond called for
redemption shall cease to accrue on the date fixed for redemption, unless the notice of
redemption is rescinded as set forth above or payment is not made for the Bond called for
redemption.
(g) Purchase of Bonds. The City reserves the right to purchase any or all of the Bonds
at any time at any price acceptable to the City plus accrued interest to the date of purchase.
Section 10. Pledge of Assessment Payments. Assessments collected in LID No. 152,
together with interest and penalties, if any, are pledged to the payment of the Bonds, which are
payable solely out of the LID Bond Fund and the Local Improvement Guaranty Fund of the City,
all in the manner provided by law. The Bonds are not general obligations of the City. The City
covenants that it will diligently commence and pursue the collection of all delinquent
assessments in LID No. 152.
Section 11. Tax Covenants.
(a) Preservation of Tax Exemption for Interest on Tax-Exempt Bonds. The City
covenants that it will take all actions necessary to prevent interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds
from being included in gross income for federal income tax purposes, and it will neither take any
action nor make or permit any use of proceeds of the Tax-Exempt Bonds or other funds of the
City treated as proceeds of the Tax-Exempt Bonds that will cause interest on the Bonds to be
included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. The City also covenants that it will, to
the extent the arbitrage rebate requirements of Section 148 of the Code are applicable to the Tax-
Page 100 of 228
-11-
FG: 103577414.3
Exempt Bonds, take all actions necessary to comply (or to be treated as having complied) with
those requirements in connection with the Tax-Exempt Bonds.
(b) Post-Issuance Compliance. The Finance Director is authorized and directed to
review and update the City’s written procedures to facilitate compliance by the City with the
covenants in this ordinance and the applicable requirements of the Code that must be satisfied
after the Issue Date to prevent interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds from being included in gross
income for federal tax purposes.
Section 12. Refunding or Defeasance of the Bonds. The City may issue refunding
bonds pursuant to State law or use money available from any other lawful source to carry out a
refunding or defeasance plan, which may include (a) paying when due the principal of and
interest on any or all of the Bonds (the “defeased Bonds”); (b) redeeming the defeased Bonds
prior to their maturity; and (c) paying the costs of the refunding or defeasance. If the City sets
aside in a special trust fund or escrow account irrevocably pledged to that redemption or
defeasance (the “trust account”), money and/or Government Obligations maturing at a time or
times and bearing interest in amounts sufficient to redeem, refund or defease the defeased Bonds
in accordance with their terms, then all right and interest of the Owners of the defeased Bonds in
the covenants of this ordinance and in the funds and accounts obligated to the payment of the
defeased Bonds shall cease and become void. Thereafter, the Owners of defeased Bonds shall
have the right to receive payment of the principal of and interest on the defeased Bonds solely
from the trust account, and the defeased Bonds shall be deemed no longer outstanding. In that
event, the City may apply money remaining in any fund or account (other than the trust account)
established for the payment or redemption of the defeased Bonds to any lawful purpose.
Unless otherwise specified by the City in a refunding or defeasance plan, notice of
refunding or defeasance shall be given, and selection of Bonds for any partial refunding or
defeasance shall be conducted, in the manner prescribed in this ordinance for the redemption of
Bonds.
Section 13. Sale and Delivery of the Bonds.
(a) Manner of Sale of Bonds; Delivery of Bonds. The Designated Representative is
authorized to sell each Series of the Bonds to the Purchaser by negotiated sale based on the
assessment of the Designated Representative of market conditions, in consultation with
appropriate City officials and staff, Bond Counsel and other advisors.
(b) Procedure for Negotiated Sale. The Designated Representative shall select one or
more Purchasers with whom to negotiate the sale of a Series of the Bonds. A Bond Purchase
Contract shall set forth the Final Terms of the sale of each Series. The Designated Representative
is authorized to execute the Bond Purchase Contract on behalf of the City, so long as the terms
provided therein are consistent with the terms of this ordinance.
(c) Preparation, Execution and Delivery of the Bonds. The Bonds will be prepared at
City expense and will be delivered to the Purchaser in accordance with the Bond Purchase
Contract, together with the approving legal opinion of Bond Counsel regarding the Bonds.
Section 14. Official Statement; Continuing Disclosure.
Page 101 of 228
-12-
FG: 103577414.3
(a) Preliminary Official Statement Deemed Final. The Designated Representative
shall review the form of the preliminary official statement prepared in connection with the sale
of a Series of the Bonds to the public. For the sole purpose of the Purchaser’s compliance with
paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 15c2-12, the Designated Representative is authorized to deem that
preliminary official statement final as of its date, except for the omission of information
permitted to be omitted by Rule 15c2-12. The City approves the distribution to potential
purchasers of the Bonds of a preliminary official statement that has been deemed final in
accordance with this subsection.
(b) Approval of Final Official Statement. The City approves the preparation of a final
official statement for any Series of the Bonds to be sold to the public in the form of the
preliminary official statement, with such modifications and amendments as the Designated
Representative deems necessary or desirable, and further authorizes the Designated
Representative to execute and deliver such final official statement to the Purchaser. The City
authorizes and approves the distribution by the Purchaser of that final official statement to
purchasers and potential purchasers of such Bonds.
(c) Undertaking to Provide Continuing Disclosure. To meet the requirements of
paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2-12, as applicable to a participating underwriter for a Series of the
Bonds, the Designated Representative is authorized and directed to execute a written undertaking
to provide continuing disclosure for the benefit of holders of such Series of the Bonds in
substantially the form attached as Exhibit B.
Section 15. Supplemental and Amendatory Ordinances. The City may supplement or
amend this ordinance for any one or more of the following purposes without the consent of any
Owners of the Bonds:
(a) To add covenants and agreements that do not materially adversely affect the
interests of Owners, or to surrender any right or power reserved to or conferred upon the City.
(b) To cure any ambiguities, or to cure, correct or supplement any defective provision
contained in this ordinance in a manner that does not materially adversely affect the interest of
the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds.
Section 16. Fixing Interest Rate on Assessments. The interest rate on the installment
payments of the special assessments in LID No. 152 is fixed at a rate equal to 0.5%, plus the rate
equal to the all-in true interest cost of the Bonds, as set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract,
carried out to two decimal places. If the Bonds are issued in more than one Series, the all-in true
interest cost shall mean a blended rate of all Series of the Bonds.
Section 17. General Authorization and Ratification. The Designated Representative
and other appropriate officers of the City are severally authorized to take such actions and to
execute such documents as in their judgment may be necessary or desirable to carry out the
transactions contemplated in connection with this ordinance, and to do everything necessary for
the prompt delivery of the Bonds to the Purchaser and for the proper application, use and
investment of the proceeds of the Bonds. All actions taken prior to the effective date of this
Page 102 of 228
-13-
FG: 103577414.3
ordinance in furtherance of the purposes described in this ordinance and not inconsistent with the
terms of this ordinance are ratified and confirmed in all respects.
Section 18. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate
and severable. If a court of competent jurisdiction, all appeals having been exhausted or all
appeal periods having run, finds any provision of this ordinance to be invalid or unenforceable as
to any person or circumstance, such offending provision shall, if feasible, be deemed to be
modified to be within the limits of enforceability or validity. However, if the offending provision
cannot be so modified, it shall be null and void with respect to the particular person or
circumstance, and all other provisions of this ordinance in all other respects, and the offending
provision with respect to all other persons and all other circumstances, shall remain valid and
enforceable.
Section 19. Conflicts with Pasco Municipal Code. To the extent that anything
contained in this ordinance is inconsistent with any provision set forth in the Pasco Municipal
Code, this ordinance and state law shall be deemed to be the controlling law for the narrow and
specific purpose of authorizing the Bonds described herein, and such provisions of the Pasco
Municipal Code shall not apply.
Section 20. Effective Date of Ordinance. This ordinance shall take effect and be in
force from and after its passage and five days following its publication as required by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, at a
regular meeting thereof, this __ day of _________, 2025.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Bond Counsel
Attachments:
Exhibit A – Description of the Bonds
Exhibit B – Form of Undertaking to Provide Continuing Disclosure
Page 103 of 228
Exhibit A
A-1
FG: 103577414.3
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF THE BONDS
(i) Principal Amount. The Bonds may be issued in one or more Series, and the
aggregate principal amount of the Bonds shall not exceed
the total amount on the assessment roll remaining
uncollected after the expiration of the 30 day prepayment
period ($12,678,905.87). To facilitate delivery of the Bonds
through the Securities Depository, the principal amount
may be rounded down to the nearest dollar.
(ii) Date or Dates. Each Bond shall be dated its Issue Date, which date may
not be later than one year after the effective date of this
ordinance and may not occur prior to 20 days after the
expiration of the 30 day prepayment period for paying
assessments. All Series of the Bonds shall bear the same
Issue Date.
(iii) Denominations, Name, etc. The Bonds shall be issued in Authorized Denominations,
initially with one Bond corresponding to each estimated
redemption date within a Series. The Bonds shall bear any
name and additional designation as deemed necessary or
appropriate by the Designated Representative or the Bond
Registrar.
(iv) Interest Rate(s). Each Bond shall bear interest at a fixed rate not to exceed
6.50% per annum (computed on the basis of a 360-day year
of twelve 30-day months) from the Issue Date or from the
most recent date for which interest has been paid or duly
provided for, whichever is later. The true interest cost to the
City for each Series of the Bonds may not exceed 6.50%.
(v) Interest Payment Dates. Interest shall be payable annually on each August 1,
commencing August 1, 2026, which is the Interest Payment
Date occurring no later than 6 months after June 1, 2026,
which is the first annual assessment installment payment
date following the Issue Date.
(vi) Maturity Date. The Bonds shall mature on August 1, 2042, which is the
Interest Payment Date next occurring after the date that is
at least 2 years after the final assessment installment
payment due date of June 1, 2040.
(vii) Redemption Rights. The Bonds shall be subject to redemption on Interest
Payment Dates, as set forth in Section 9 of this ordinance.
Page 104 of 228
A-2
FG: 103577414.3
(viii) Price. The purchase price for each Series of the Bonds shall not
be less than 98% nor more than 100% of the stated
principal amount of the Bonds.
(ix) Other Terms & Conditions. The Designated Representative may determine whether it is
in the City’s best interest to provide for bond insurance or
other credit enhancement; may designate a Series of the
Bonds as Tax-Exempt Bonds or as taxable Bonds; may
appoint the Fiscal Agent or the Finance Director as the
initial Bond Registrar for a Series of the Bonds; agree to a
minimum Guaranty Fund balance requirement; and may
accept such additional terms, conditions and covenants as
he or she may determine are in the best interests of the
City, consistent with this ordinance.
Page 105 of 228
Exhibit B
B-1
FG: 103577414.3
[Form of]
UNDERTAKING TO PROVIDE CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
City of Pasco, Washington
Local Improvement District No. 152 Bonds
The City of Pasco, Washington (the “City”), makes the following written Undertaking for
the benefit of holders of the above-referenced bonds (the “Bonds”), for the sole purpose of
assisting the Purchaser in meeting the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2-12, as
applicable to a participating underwriter for the Bonds. Capitalized terms used but not defined
below shall have the meanings given in Ordinance No. ____ of the City (the “Bond Ordinance”).
(a) Undertaking to Provide Annual Financial Information and Notice of Listed
Events. The City undertakes to provide or cause to be provided, either directly or through a
designated agent, to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB,
accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB:
(i) Annual financial information and operating data of the type included in the final
official statement for the Bonds and described in paragraph (b) (“annual financial
information”);
(ii) Timely notice (not in excess of 10 business days after the occurrence of the event)
of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds:
(1) principal and interest payment delinquencies; (2) non-payment related
defaults, if material; (3) unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting
financial difficulties; (4) unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting
financial difficulties; (5) substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their
failure to perform; (6) adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue
Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notice of Proposed Issue
(IRS Form 5701 – TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect
to the tax status of the Bonds; (7) modifications to rights of holders of the Bonds,
if material; (8) bond calls (other than scheduled mandatory redemptions of Term
Bonds), if material, and tender offers; (9) defeasances; (10) release, substitution,
or sale of property securing repayment of the Bonds, if material; (11) rating
changes; (12) bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the City or
any obligated person, as such “obligated person” and “Bankruptcy Events” are
defined in Rule 15c2-12; (13) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or
acquisition involving the City or an obligated person or the sale of all or
substantially all of the assets of the City or an obligated person other than in the
ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake
such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such
actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; (14) appointment of a
successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material;
(15) incurrence of a financial obligation of the City or obligated person, if
material, or agreement to covenants, events of default, remedies, priority rights, or
other similar terms of a financial obligation of the City or obligated person, any of
which affect security holders, if material; and (16) default, event of acceleration,
Page 106 of 228
B-2
FG: 103577414.3
termination event, modification of terms, or other similar events under the terms
of the financial obligation of the City or obligated person, any of which reflect
financial difficulties. The term “financial obligation” means a (i) debt obligation;
(ii) derivative instrument entered into in connection with, or pledged as security
or a source of payment for, an existing or planned debt obligation; or (iii)
guarantee of (i) or (ii). The term “financial obligation” shall not include municipal
securities as to which a final official statement has been provided to the MSRB
consistent with Rule 15c2-12; and
(iii) Timely notice of a failure by the City to provide required annual financial
information on or before the date specified in paragraph (b).
(b) Type of Annual Financial Information Undertaken to be Provided. The annual
financial information that the City undertakes to provide in paragraph (a):
(i) Shall consist of (1) annual financial statements prepared (except as noted in the
financial statements) in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting
principles applicable to local governmental units of the State such as the City, as
such principles may be changed from time to time, which statements may be
unaudited, provided, that if and when audited financial statements are prepared
and available they will be provided; (2) a statement of the outstanding balance of
obligations secured by the Local Improvement Guaranty Fund; (3) the balance of
cash and investments in the Local Improvement Guaranty Fund at fiscal year end;
and (4) a statement of the amount of assessments that the City billed and collected
in that fiscal year;
(ii) Shall be provided not later than the last day of the ninth month after the end of
each fiscal year of the City (currently, a fiscal year ending December 31), as such
fiscal year may be changed as required or permitted by State law, commencing
with the City’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2024; and
(iii) May be provided in a single or multiple documents, and may be incorporated by
specific reference to documents available to the public on the Internet website of
the MSRB or filed with the SEC.
(c) Amendment of Undertaking. This Undertaking is subject to amendment after the
primary offering of the Bonds without the consent of any holder of any Bond, or of any broker,
dealer, municipal securities dealer, participating underwriter, Rating Agency or the MSRB,
under the circumstances and in the manner permitted by Rule 15c2-12. The City will give notice
to the MSRB of the substance (or provide a copy) of any amendment to the Undertaking and a
brief statement of the reasons for the amendment. If the amendment changes the type of annual
financial information to be provided, the annual financial information containing the amended
financial information will include a narrative explanation of the effect of that change on the type
of information to be provided.
(d) Beneficiaries. This Undertaking shall inure to the benefit of the City and the
holder of each Bond, and shall not inure to the benefit of or create any rights in any other person.
Page 107 of 228
B-3
FG: 103577414.3
(e) Termination of Undertaking. The City’s obligations under this Undertaking shall
terminate upon the legal defeasance of all of the Bonds. In addition, the City’s obligations under
this Undertaking shall terminate if the provisions of Rule 15c2-12 that require the City to comply
with this Undertaking become legally inapplicable in respect of the Bonds for any reason, as
confirmed by an opinion of Bond Counsel delivered to the City, and the City provides timely
notice of such termination to the MSRB.
(f) Remedy for Failure to Comply with Undertaking. As soon as practicable after the
City learns of any failure to comply with this Undertaking, the City will proceed with due
diligence to cause such noncompliance to be corrected. No failure by the City or other obligated
person to comply with this Undertaking shall constitute a default in respect of the Bonds. The
sole remedy of any holder of a Bond shall be to take action to compel the City or other obligated
person to comply with this Undertaking, including seeking an order of specific performance from
an appropriate court.
(g) Designation of Official Responsible to Administer Undertaking. The Finance
Director or his or her designee is the person designated, in accordance with the Bond Ordinance,
to carry out the Undertaking in accordance with Rule 15c2-12, including, without limitation, the
following actions:
(i) Preparing and filing the annual financial information undertaken to be provided;
(ii) Determining whether any event specified in paragraph (a) has occurred, assessing
its materiality, where necessary, with respect to the Bonds, and preparing and
disseminating any required notice of its occurrence;
(iii) Determining whether any person other than the City is an “obligated person”
within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 with respect to the Bonds, and obtaining
from such person an undertaking to provide any annual financial information and
notice of listed events for that person required under Rule 15c2-12;
(iv) Selecting, engaging and compensating designated agents and consultants,
including financial advisors and legal counsel, to assist and advise the City in
carrying out this Undertaking; and
(v) Effecting any necessary amendment of this Undertaking.
Page 108 of 228
FG: 103577414.3
CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Pasco, Washington (the “City”), hereby
certify as follows:
1. The attached copy of Ordinance No. ____ (the “Ordinance”) is a full, true and correct
copy of an ordinance duly passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held at the
regular meeting place thereof on _______ __, 2025, as that ordinance appears on the minute
book of the City.
2. The Ordinance will be in full force and effect five days after publication in the City’s
official newspaper, which publication date is _______ __, 2025.
3. A quorum of the members of the City Council was present throughout the meeting
and a majority of the members voted in the proper manner for the passage of the Ordinance.
Dated: ______ __, 2025.
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
_____________________________________
City Clerk
Page 109 of 228
June 9, 2025
Pasco City Council
Workshop
Pa
g
e
1
1
0
o
f
2
2
8
What is a LID?
A Local Improvement District (LID) serves as a mechanism to finance capital
improvements that primarily benefit property owners of specific properties.
◦Allow for long term financing of improvements typically at low-interest rates
◦Repayment is spread over many years
◦Assessments to property owners reflect special benefit received
◦Includes all specially benefitted properties in the assessment
As the improvements have a specific benefit to private owners, City funding of
improvements is not correct. City funding of improvements that don’t provide
widespread benefit conflict with the State of Washington prohibition on gifting of
public funds.
Pa
g
e
1
1
1
o
f
2
2
8
LID Process
Initiated by resolution (City initiated) or petition (property owner initiated)
Potential LID is discussed as part of a public hearing. A LID is created by
council adoption of ordinance.
Two possible methodologies for assessment per State statute:
◦Mathematical – based on measurement unit
◦Special Benefit Analysis – assessment calculated by certified appraiser
◦A special benefit analysis will be undertaken for this LID upon
completion
◦As part of the planning process a preliminary appraisal was
undertaken by a third party
Pa
g
e
1
1
2
o
f
2
2
8
LID Steps
◦Pre-formation and evaluation of feasibility
◦Formation
◦Cost estimates and preliminary assessment roll creation
◦Formation hearing notices to property owners
◦Formation hearing
◦Protest and appeals periods
◦Design, construction and interim financing
◦LID close out process
◦Final assessment roll and hearing
◦Post assessment roll hearing actions or appeals
◦Ordinance for final assessment roll
◦Treasurer notice of final assessment (30-day interest free prepayment period)
◦Long-term financing secured
◦First annual assessment payment due approximately one year later
Current
stage
Currently, in
this phase
Pa
g
e
1
1
3
o
f
2
2
8
East UGA Sewer LID
◦Project constructed sanitary sewer and lift station improvements within the East
Urban Growth Area Expansion
◦Area of improvement includes several large parcels (10 acres or more), comprising
approximately 1,100 acres.
◦Includes parcels in various stages of development
◦No property owners with LID 152 contested creation of the LID
◦LID formation was approved by council May 2, 2022
◦Interim financing of $20M received March 14, 2024, and matures Sept. 1, 2025
◦Project acceptance for last phases occurred on Nov. 18, 2024
◦Final assessment roll adopted on March 3, 2025
◦30-day interest-free prepayment period expired on May 2, 2025
◦Current request supports issuance of long-term financing.
Pa
g
e
1
1
4
o
f
2
2
8
Future Steps
•Adopt ordinance authorizing issuance of the $12.68 million LID Bond
•Approve budget amendment to allocate Sewer Fund reserves for the
City’s reserve capacity contribution
•Finance Department to coordinate with Bond Team on rating call and
bond issuance
•Finance to bill property owners annually and manage annual debt service
payments
Pa
g
e
1
1
5
o
f
2
2
8
QUESTIONS? Pa
g
e
1
1
6
o
f
2
2
8
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 2, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 6/9/25
FROM: Maria Serra, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution - Professional Services Agreement Amendment No. 5 with
WSP USA, Inc. for the Lewis Street Overpass Project (5 minute staff
presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution for WSP Professional Services Agreement Amendment No. 5
Exhibit A: WSP Professional Services Agreement Amendment No. 5
Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presentation - Michael Uhlman, WSP, Inc.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Original Construction Management PSA with WSP, Inc. $1,852,654.64
Previously Approved Amendments Nos. 1-4 $1,113,825.86
Proposed Amendment No.5 (subject to approval) $99,485.75
Proposed PSA Total with WSP, Inc
$3,065,966.25
The costs associated with this amendment are expected to be offset by
liquidated damages assessed to the contractor for the additional contract days
required to complete the repairs.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Street Lewis existing the replaces project Overpass Street Lewis The
undercrossing, constructed under the BNSF Railyard in 1937, with a new
bridge over the railyard.
On March 1, 2021, Council awarded the Lewis Street Overpass construction
contract the in WA Vancouver, Bridge, LLC amount Cascade to of of
$22,344,999.88. Since construction began, the project has required fifty-six
Page 117 of 228
(56) change orders for a total of $6,844,330.84.
WSP AMENDMENT NO. 5
The original Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with WSP USA, Inc.
(WSP) was authorized by Council on July 24, 2020. The agreement included a
scope and budget for 24 months of construction administration services for the
Lewis Street Overpass project. Construction bids were opened on January 28,
2021, approximately six months after the start of the agreement’s term.
Amendment No. 1, executed on November 12, 2021, provided compensation
for additional work related to the inspection of bridge girders. These
inspections were initially planned to be performed by the Washington State
Department COVID-related to however, due Transportation of (WSDOT);
staffing shortages, WSDOT informed the City that they would be unable to
complete delays, the work. To avoid significant WSP having qualified
personnel available performed the inspections.
Amendment No. 2, executed on February 15, 2024, compensated WSP for
supplemental the extended to construction services management due
construction timeline.
Amendment No. 3 provided additional funding to continue construction
management services through the remainder of the project. These services
were originally expected to continue through February 2025.
Amendment No. 4 extended the contract end date to December 31, 2025. No
additional costs were associated with this amendment.
Amendment No. 5 will provide additional scope for WSP to perform
construction inspection services during scheduled corrective work in June and
July of 2025. The costs associated with this amendment are expected to be
offset by liquidated damages assessed to the contractor for the additional
contract days required to complete the repairs.
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services
Agreement with WSP, Inc. This amendment is necessary to support scheduled
corrective work to be performed by Cascade Bridge (contractor) in June and
July 2025 in the final efforts to complete the project.
WSP role is to ensure the delivery of the project is consistent with the project
specifications. WSP has served as the construction management consultant
since the beginning of the project and has developed a thorough understanding
Page 118 of 228
of the project’s complexities, coordination requirements, and construction
history. Maintaining continuity with WSP through the final work on the project
ensures efficient oversight, preserves institutional knowledge, and reduces the
risk of further delays or miscommunication during this final phase of work.
Page 119 of 228
Resolution – WSP USA, INC – LSO PSA Amend 5 - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH WSP USA, INC. FOR THE LEWIS STREET OVERPASS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) and WSP USA, Inc. entered into a Professional
Services Agreement on July 24, 2020, to provide construction management services with respect
to the Lewis Street Overpass Project; and
WHEREAS, the City and WSP USA, Inc. entered into Amendment No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement on November 12, 2021, in the amount of $49,422.86 to provide
girder fabrication inspection services with respect to the Lewis Street Overpass Project; and
WHEREAS, the City and WSP USA, Inc. entered into Amendment No. 2 to the
Professional Services Agreement on November 20, 2023, in the amount of $914,433.00 to provide
ongoing construction management and inspection services support during the extended
construction period; and
WHEREAS, the City and WSP USA, Inc. entered into Amendment No. 3 to the
Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $150,000.00 to provide ongoing construction
management and inspection services support during the extended construction period; and
WHEREAS, the City and WSP USA, Inc. entered into Amendment No. 4 to the
Professional Services Agreement to extend the contract end date to December 31, 2025, with no
additional cost to the City; and
WHEREAS, the City and WSP USA, Inc. desire to enter into Amendment No. 5 to the
Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $99,485.75 to provide additional funding for
construction inspection services during scheduled repair work anticipated to occur in June and July
of 2025; and
WHEREAS, the costs associated with Amendment No. 5 are expected to be offset by
liquidated damages assessed to the contractor for additional contract days required to complete the
repair work; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into Amendment
No. 5 with WSP USA, Inc.
Page 120 of 228
Resolution – WSP USA, INC – LSO PSA Amend 5 - 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of
Amendment No. 5 between the City of Pasco and WSP USA, Inc. as attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the Interim City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington,
is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Amendment No. 5 on behalf of the
City of Pasco; and to make minor substantive changes as necessary to execute the Amendment.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 121 of 228
WSP USA, Inc Amendment No. 5 to PSA
LSO Contract Mngt – 13007
Version 05.11.24 Page 1
AMENDMENT NUMBER 5 to
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Lewis Street Overpass Construction Management
PROJECT: 13007
AGREEMENT NO. 20-018
WHEREAS, the City and WSP USA, Inc. entered into a Professional Services
Agreement on July, 24, 2020 to provide engineering services with respect to the Lewis Street
Overpass project.
WHEREAS, the City and WSP USA Inc. entered into an Amendment/Amendment No.
1 to provide Construction Engineering on November 12, 2021.
WHEREAS, the City and WSP USA Inc. entered into an Amendment/Amendment No.
2 to provide Construction Engineering on February 15, 2024.
WHEREAS, the City and WSP USA Inc. entered into an Amendment/Amendment No.
3 to provide Construction Engineering on December 9, 2024.
WHEREAS, the City and WSP USA Inc. entered into an Amendment/Amendment No.
4 to provide Construction Engineering on February 24, 2025.
NOW, THEREFORE, this agreement is amended to allow WSP USA Inc., to provide
additional Construction Engineering services as described in Exhibit A.
1. Scope of Work:
See Exhibit A
2. Fee:
The compensation for the work is based on a Time and Materials Basis not to exceed
the amount of $99,485.75 for a total authorization amount of $3,066,996.25.
3. Time of performance:
The services shall be complete for the project on or before December 31, 2025.
Page 122 of 228
WSP USA, Inc Amendment No. 5 to PSA
LSO Contract Mngt – 13007
Version 05.11.24 Page 2
DATED THIS DAY______________________________.
[date of execution]
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON WSP USA Inc.
Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager Jill Marilley, Construction Services Manager
Page 123 of 228
EXHIBIT A
City of Pasco
Scope of Work
Amendment #5
Lewis Street Overcrossing Construction Management
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The original project description is supplemented with construction management for the repairs of the
expansion joint, approach slabs, barrier transition, and related areas. This also adds verification of the
punchlist and project closeout. This amendment does not cover inspection of the coping repair if it does
not coincide with the work already noted.
PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS
The original project assumptions are per Amendment 4.
DEFINITIONS & ABBREVIATIONS
This section is unchanged.
Task 1 Project Management
This section is supplemented with the following:
• Remote attendance at weekly coordination meetings during the field repair and punchlist work
• Remote attendance at weekly coordination and brainstorming meetings with the City, the
Contractor, and the Designer for the coping damage resolution. Meetings to be finished by
August 30, 2025 and are assumed to average two hours per week.
Assumptions
This section is unchanged.
Deliverables
The deliverables are unchanged.
Task 2 Resident Engineer
The original scope is supplemented with the following :
• One site visit to start inspection of the repairs and coordination with the contractor
• Remote monitoring of inspection efforts
• One site visit to verify completion of punchlist work if required
• Remote attendance at weekly coordination meetings during the field repair and punchlist work
• Remote attendance at weekly coordination and brainstorming meetings with the City, the Contractor,
and the Designer for the coping damage resolution. Meetings to be finished by August 30, 2025 and
are assumed to average two hours per week.
Assumptions
The original assumptions are supplemented with the following:
• Up to 10 hours per week during the field repair and punchlist work, assumed to take up to four
weeks.
• Both site visits are up to three days in duration
Deliverables
The deliverables are unchanged.
Page 124 of 228
Task 3 Office Engineering
The original scope is supplemented with the following:
• Duration remains through the end of December, 2025.
Assumptions
This section is unchanged.
Deliverables
The deliverables are unchanged.
Task 4 Quality Verification Inspections
This section is supplemented with the following:
• Provide inspector duties as necessary for the repair and replacement of the expansion joint and
related areas, up to four weeks of work at 50 hours of contractor working time per week.
Assumptions
This section is unchanged.
Deliverables
The deliverables are unchanged.
Total Project Costs for Amendment #5
Labor – Regular & OT $ 83,962.95
Other Direct Costs $ 15,522.80
___________
Total Amendment #2 Costs $ 99,485.75
Page 125 of 228
June 9, 2025
Lewis Street Overpass
Council Meeting
Pa
g
e
1
2
6
o
f
2
2
8
Current Schedule:
•Groundbreaking Ceremony = June 4, 2021
•Contractor Began Work = August 30, 2021
•400 working day contract
•Bridge Open for Vehicles = April 26, 2024
•Substantial Completion Date = November 2024
•Corrective Work – June/July 2025
Lewis Street Overpass
Pa
g
e
1
2
7
o
f
2
2
8
WSP
•Amendment Request
•Staff has reviewed the request in detail
•Contract duration has doubled
•400 working days 800+ working days
•More change orders than anticipated
•Long schedule disputes
•Required
•Services the City is not equipped to cover
•Notable work provided outside of Scope
•Facilitated community outreach meetings
•Negotiated access to businesses during construction
•Heavy BNSF Coordination
•Provided soil sample collection, delivery and coordinated lab testing
Lewis Street Overpass
Pa
g
e
1
2
8
o
f
2
2
8
WSP Contract
•WSP (Construction Management)
•Original Contract = $1,852,654.64
•Supplement 1 = $49,422.86 ($1,902,077.50 contract total)
•WSP provided services that WSDOT could not due to COVID-19
•Supplement 2 = $914,433.00
•Contract extension due to longer duration project
•Supplement 3 = $150,000.00
•Provided services through spring 2025
•Supplement 4 = Time only
•Extends contract duration through 2025 so it didn’t expire
•Proposed Supplement 5 = $99,485.75
•Provides inspection services
•City may offset costs with Liquidated Damages from Contractor
Total Proposed Contract = $3,065,996.25
Lewis Street Overpass
Pa
g
e
1
2
9
o
f
2
2
8
Questions?
Lewis Street Overpass
Pa
g
e
1
3
0
o
f
2
2
8
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 4, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 6/9/25
FROM: Maria Serra, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Ordinance - Budget Amendment for Upsize Program Water and
Irrigation (5 minute staff presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
NA
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Proposed budget amendment for Development Upsize program
Water Fund (Fund 411): $1,300,000
Irrigation Fund (Fund 420): $550,000
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City of Pasco’s Utility Upsize Program is an infrastructure planning tool
designed to efficiently coordinate public utility improvements with private
utility as extensions—such construct development As activity. developers
water, sewer, and irrigation infrastructure—to serve new development projects,
the City evaluates opportunities to upsize those facilities in accordance with
long-range system planning and utility master plans. Upsizing typically involves
increasing future meet to capacities projected or diameters pipe system
demand or to support regional service needs beyond the scope of a single
development.
To facilitate this, the City enters into cost-sharing agreements with developers,
whereby during the developer installs the upsized infrastructure project
construction, and the City reimburses the incremental cost difference between
the standard development requirement and the upsized specification. This
approach minimizes future disruptions, avoids redundant construction, and
Page 131 of 228
ensures cost-effective delivery of infrastructure.
Funding for the upsizing component is programmed through the City’s utility
operating budgets. These budgets are supported by utility revenues and capital
expansion fees. The Utility Upsize Program supports orderly growth, system
resiliency, and long-term service efficiency. Budgeting for such activity is more
complicated by the fact that the construction activity is based on private
development schedule. As a policy, City budgets conservatively, specially on
expenses. upsize Irrigation and and for allocations Historical Water
development contributions ranged between $200,000 and $400,000 biannually.
If additional budget is required, staff requests amendment to the budget. In
2025-2026 Biennial Budget, Irrigation Utility budgeted $300,000 for upsizes
and budget for Water Utility was inadvertently missed.
V. DISCUSSION:
The proposed allocations for the current biennium are $1.3 Million for Water
Utility and $550,000 for Irrigation Utility. These funding estimates are based on
a comprehensive review of current outstanding obligations—including projects
underway with pending reimbursements—as well as anticipated commitments
through the remainder of the biennium. This amendment positions the City to
meet delivering its cost-sharing responsibilities and continue coordinated
infrastructure improvements consistent with our adopted utility master plans.
Current reserves can support this budget amendment; however, resources are
strained due to significant needs across our utility systems. It’s important to
recognize that not partnering with private development for upsizing
infrastructure is not an economical option and could lead to substantial costs in
the future.
Looking ahead, this funding challenge underscores the need to revisit the
utility’s expansion funding approach, particularly by adjusting capital expansion
fees for the Water Utility. Staff is currently conducting a Water and Sewer Utility
Revenue Requirement Study, similar to the recent analysis for the Irrigation
Utility. When properly calibrated, these Capital Expansion Fees can establish a
sustainable funding reserve to support capacity improvements initiated by the
City or developers, including upsizing efforts.
this on discussion and We Council’s requesting are matter. guidance
Meanwhile, a legal review is underway to determine whether this budget
amendment complies with RCW requirements, as biennial budget amendments
are generally not permitted until the third quarter of the first year. If the
amendment is compliant, staff plans to return with an ordinance next week. If
not, we seek verbal approval to proceed with execution of upsizing agreements
so that our development partners can be reimbursed promptly.
Page 132 of 228
Page 133 of 228
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 2, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 6/9/25
FROM: Brian Cartwright, Division Manager
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Resolutions - Approving Three (3) Developer Reimbursement
Agreements for the Utility Improvements Associated with the
“Broadmoor TIF-Utility Package Project” (5 minute staff presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Presentation
Resolutions
Exhibit-Development Reimbursement Agreements
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion/Presentation
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City of Pasco, acting in the capacity of a developer under RCW 35.91 and
PMC 14.25, constructed utility improvements within the Sandifur Parkway and
Road 108 rights-of-way to support future development. These improvements
benefit abutting private properties, not City-owned development. To recover the
proportionate latecomer submitted City the these of cost improvements,
applications for three utility systems: water, sewer, and irrigation.
As Broadmoor part of the TIF-Utility Package Project, the following
improvements were completed:
Water: ~8,300 linear feet of 6", 8", 12", and 24" water main; 26 blow-off
assemblies; 19 fire hydrant assemblies; 2 air relief valves; and a
pressure reducing station.
Irrigation: ~6,176 linear feet of 12" and 16" irrigation main; 10 service
Page 134 of 228
connections; and 5 air relief valves.
Sewer: ~7,075 linear feet of 6", 8", 12", and 15" sewer main; and 23 48-
inch manholes.
These improvements fulfill the "to and through" utility extension requirements
and support planned development throughout the benefit area.
Construction is complete and has been formally accepted by the City. Final
construction costs were submitted by the City (as developer), reviewed by staff
(as administrator), and verified as accurate and consistent with completed
work.
V. DISCUSSION:
RCW 35.91 authorizes municipalities to enter into contracts with property
owners who voluntarily construct water or sewer facilities at their own expense.
It provides a mechanism for reimbursement from other property owners who
subsequently benefit from those improvements. RCW 35.91.020 specifically
allows municipalities to exercise the same rights as private developers for cost
recovery.
Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter 14.25 implements this authority at the
local level. While most developer reimbursement agreements are initiated by
private parties, PMC Section 14.25.070 expressly permits the City to act as a
developer and seek reimbursement for utility infrastructure constructed to
support future
development.
In this case, the City initiated latecomer agreements for utility infrastructure
installed in the public right-of-way under the Broadmoor TIF-Utility Package
Project. Though the City is not developing any private property, it constructed
these improvements at its own expense to serve abutting parcels. The benefit
area and cost allocations have been reviewed in accordance with applicable
law, and all procedural requirements of RCW 35.91 and PMC Chapter 14.25
have been satisfied.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the final Developer
Reimbursement Agreements for the water, sewer, and irrigation improvements
associated with the Broadmoor TIF-Utility Package Project. Upon approval, the
agreements will be executed by the City Manager pursuant to Pasco Municipal
Code.
Page 135 of 228
June 9, 2025
Pasco City Council
Workshop
Pa
g
e
1
3
6
o
f
2
2
8
City Initiated Developer
Reimbursement Agreement
–“A” Street Sports
Complex
June 9, 2025
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
1
3
7
o
f
2
2
8
“A” Street Sports Complex
3
•The City built water and sewer
along South Elm Street
•Supports development of City
owned property as well as 3
privately owned parcels.
•Utilities built:
•Water ≈ 460 feet of pipe, 1 fire hydrant
•Sewer ≈ 660 feet of pipe, 2 manholes
Pa
g
e
1
3
8
o
f
2
2
8
4
“A” Street Sports Complex
Pa
g
e
1
3
9
o
f
2
2
8
Summary and Next Steps
5
Pa
g
e
1
4
0
o
f
2
2
8
Summary and Next Steps
6
• The City invested in infrastructure to support future growth.
• Reimbursement Agreements allow the City to recover part of the costs
from benefitting property owners.
• Developer Reimbursement Agreements are executed by the City
Manager.
• Staff recommends approval of the Resolutions authorizing the City
Manager to execute 2 Developer Reimbursement Agreements
Pa
g
e
1
4
1
o
f
2
2
8
Questions?Pa
g
e
1
4
2
o
f
2
2
8
Resolution – Broadmoor TIF Irrigation DRA - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF IRRIGATION WATER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR
BROADMOOR TIF UTILITY PACKAGE PROJECT .
WHEREAS, RCW 35.91 and Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter 14.25 establish a
statutory framework that allows developers to enter into Developer Reimbursement Agreements
when they fund necessary infrastructure improvements as a condition of development; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.91.020 and PMC Section 14.25.070 further provide that
municipalities may exercise the same reimbursement rights as private developers when they
construct such improvements at their own expense; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has submitted a complete and accurate application for a
Developer Reimbursement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, PMC Section 14.25.030(4) requires the Public Works Director, within 28
days of receipt of a Developer Reimbursement Agreement application to provide notice to the
developer whether the application is complete or needs to be supplemented or amended within 30
days of such notice unless extended within the Public Works Director’s discretion; and
WHEREAS, notice of complete application was provided to the applicant on December
5, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City shall provide notice of its preliminary assessment reimbursement
area (those to repay the developer debt) to provide the property owners within the preliminary
assessment area the opportunity to request the matter be submitted to a public hearing, within 20
days of date of mailing of the notice, before Council action; and
WHEREAS, the City mailed notices of the preliminary assessment and reimbursement to
the property owners within the preliminary reimbursement area on October 30, 2024 , and did not
receive in writing a request for a hearing before Council; and
WHEREAS, utility system improvements include infrastructure projects related to City
water, sewer and storm sewer which are required to be constructed as a prerequisite of continued
development; and.
WHEREAS, utility system Developer Reimbursement Agreements requested by
developers shall be entered into by the City of Pasco pursuant to PMC 14.25.030(3) once the
prerequisite of Chapter 14.25 of the PMC have been met; and
Page 143 of 228
Resolution – Broadmoor TIF Irrigation DRA - 2
WHEREAS, utility Developer Reimbursement Agreements shall meet the development
criteria as detailed in PMC Section 14.25.030(3)(b); and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco agrees to payment of project costs, including legal and
administrative costs, as set forth in the Developer Reimbursement Agreement, attached as Exhibit
A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the Interim City Manager is authorized to execute the Developer Reimbursement
Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the Interim City Manager be authorized to make minor
substantive changes to the Developer Reimbursement Agreement as needed.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 144 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF:
City of Pasco, Washington
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Pasco, Washington
525 North 3rd Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
AGREEMENT# AGRMT2023-047ir
Additional Parcels and Full Legal Descriptions attached hereto as Exhibit (B)
CITY OF PASCO
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
RCW 35.91 - Broadmoor TIF-Utility Package Project
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of___________, 2025,
by and between the City of Pasco, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as “City”, and the property owners listed on Exhibit (A) hereinafter called “Owner”;
and
WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 35.91 gives cities the authority to finance the construction of
Utility infrastructure, to assess benefited properties for pro rata share of construction costs, and to
collect reimbursements from property owners who connect to the system within twenty (20) years;
and
WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 35.91 and PMC 14.25.070 authorize the City to partner with
interested parties in financing development of Utility facilities, and to receive developer
reimbursements for City expenditures on same; and
WHEREAS, the City has, by Resolution_______ adopted by City Council on the _______
day of ______________, 2025, approved the reimbursement agreement for the construction of the
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Package Project by the City to a certain tract of land and established a
preliminary assessment reimbursement area and preliminary pro rata share of costs;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
1. The City constructed, at their expense, the Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project as per
construction plans signed and approved by the Public Works Director, or his/her designee.
The Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project will:
Exhibit (C)
Page 145 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
Beginning at the intersection of Harris Road and Road 108 connecting to
the existing 16-inch irrigation main thence heading north within the Road
108 roadway section approximately 3,000-feet to the north side of the
intersection of Sandifur Parkway and Road 108. From that intersection the
irrigation main continues east within Sandifur Parkway road section
approximately 2,700-feet connecting to the existing 16-inch irrigation main
within Broadmoor Boulevard. The project includes tee and “x” fixtures as
well as main extensions and blow-off assemblies at future intersections and
locations where irrigation main extensions have been deemed necessary for
further development of the Broadmoor Area. Pipe sizes installed for this
project were 16-inches within the Sandifur Parkway road section and 12-
inch PVC within the Road 108 road section. The benefitting parcels are
being assessed the value of the 12-inch irrigation main installation as this
was deemed necessary to serve the Broadmoor Area.
The facilities subject to this Agreement are included within the City's comprehensive utility
plan for the properties in Exhibit (B), and no additional comprehensive plan approval for
the utility system improvements was required. The facility was constructed in accordance
with the City Standard Specifications and Drawings in effect governing the construction
and specifications for facilities of such type, and subject to the approval of the Public
Works Director, or his/her designee. The City has determined a final “Assessment Area”
showing the benefiting parcels to be served by the facility, which is determined at the sole
discretion of the City, and which are identified and legally described in Exhibit (C)
2. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreements associated with utility system
improvements shall be valid for a period not to exceed twenty (20) years from the effective
date of the agreement.
While a developer agreement is valid, any person, firm or corporation now or hereafter
owning benefitted properties described below, or segregated parcels thereof, desiring to
connect to the described facilities, shall first pay their pro-rata share of the total cost of the
facilities (“Total Assessment”). For this project, the Total Assessment is shown in
Exhibit(A). The individual Assessment associated with each parcel of benefited property
described in this Agreement shall be charged to the property owner as shown in Exhibit
(A).
3. With the completion of construction of the facility and its acceptance by the Public Works
Director, or his/her designee, and Council’s adoption of this Developer Reimbursement
Agreement, the City shall record latecomer assessments against all benefiting properties in
the assessment reimbursement area (“Latecomer Fees”), and the facility will become a part
of the municipal system of the City. Maintenance and operation costs of the said facilities
will be borne by the City, except for work and corrections covered by the contractor’s one-
year warranty bond.
Page 146 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
4. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that with the completion of
construction and Council adoption of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement, no
person, firm or corporation owning property within the assessment reimbursement area
shall be granted a permit or be authorized by City to connect to or use the referenced
facilities during the period of time prescribed in Paragraph 2 above without first paying to
City, in addition to any and all other costs, assessments and charges made and assessed for
such tap or use, the amount required by the provisions of this contract. All amounts so
received by the City shall be used to reimburse the Water Utility Fund for the capital
improvement. After the expiration of the time prescribed in Paragraph 2 of the agreement,
City standard fees in effect at the time, will apply.
5. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that following passage of the
Developer Reimbursement Agreement by City Council, whenever any connection is made
onto the facility described in Paragraph 1 under the contract without such payment having
first been made in accordance with Exhibit (A), the City may remove or cause to be
removed, such unauthorized connection and all connected lines or pipe located in the
facility right-of-way, and dispose of such material removed without any liability
whatsoever.
6. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that following passage of this
Developer Reimbursement Agreement by City Council, and upon recording said
Developer Reimbursement Agreement with the appropriate county auditor's office within
thirty (30) days of its final execution, the terms of said Agreement shall run with the land
contained within the assessment reimbursement area and bind subsequent owners of the
properties affected
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and
year first above written.
received by the City shall be used to reimburse the Water/Sewer Utility fund for the capital
improvement. after the expiration of the time prescribed in paragraph 2 of the agreement,
City standard fees in effect at the time, will apply.
Page 147 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager
ATTEST:
Debra C. Barham, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC, City Attorney
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
: ss
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN )
On this day personally appeared before me DAVE ZABELL, Interim City Manager of the
City of Pasco, Washington, described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ___ day of ______________, 2025.
________________________________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Print Name: _____________________________
Residing at _______________________________
My Commission Expires: ___________________
Page 148 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
EXHIBIT A
IR
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
PE
R
M
I
T
#
P
a
r
c
e
l
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
[
F
T
]
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
Co
s
t
[
%
]
=
[(
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
Pa
r
c
e
l
Fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
[F
T
]
)
/
(
T
o
t
a
l
Pa
r
c
e
l
Fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
[F
T
]
)
]
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
s
t
[
$
]
=
(
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
s
t
[%
]
)
*
(
T
o
t
a
l
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
)
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
3
4
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
86
3
7.
4
7
%
52
,
7
5
5
.
6
2
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
3
5
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
86
0
7.
4
5
%
52
,
5
7
2
.
2
2
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
3
6
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
90
2
7.
8
1
%
55
,
1
3
9
.
7
1
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
4
0
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
11
8
8
10
.
2
9
%
72
,
6
2
3
.
0
3
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
4
1
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
50
0
4.
3
3
%
30
,
5
6
5
.
2
5
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
1
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
69
9
6.
0
5
%
42
,
7
3
0
.
2
2
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
2
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
82
0
7.
1
0
%
50
,
1
2
7
.
0
0
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
8
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
73
1
6.
3
3
%
44
,
6
8
6
.
3
9
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
3
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
44
8
3.
8
8
%
27
,
3
8
6
.
4
6
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
6
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
73
1
6.
3
3
%
44
,
6
8
6
.
3
9
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
9
PA
S
C
O
P
U
B
L
I
C
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
95
1
8.
2
4
%
58
,
1
3
5
.
1
0
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
7
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
13
4
2
11
.
6
2
%
82
,
0
3
7
.
1
2
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
4
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
72
8
6.
3
1
%
44
,
5
0
3
.
0
0
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
5
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
78
3
6.
7
8
%
47
,
8
6
5
.
1
8
$
TO
T
A
L
S
:
11
5
4
6
.
0
0
10
0
.
0
0
%
70
5
,
8
1
2
.
6
8
$
70
5
,
8
1
2
.
6
8
$
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
AG
M
N
T
2
0
2
3
-
0
4
7
i
r
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
To
t
a
l
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
11
5
4
6
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
o
f
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
$7
0
5
,
8
1
2
.
6
8
Be
n
e
f
i
t
A
r
e
a
Pa
r
c
e
l
#
,
O
w
n
e
r
LA
T
E
C
O
M
E
R
A
M
O
U
N
T
:
Page 149 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
EXHIBIT B
Page 150 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
EXHIBIT C
IRRIGATION
BENNEFITTING PARCELS
115-210-034
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 7; LOT 4 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-035
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; LOT 5 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-036
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; LOT 6 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-040
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; LOT 10 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-041
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; LOT 11 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-211
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND
THE NORTHWEST OF THE SOUTHEAST OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF
THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON,
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR
EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316. EXCEPT: THE SOUTH 212.64 FEET OF SAID
LOT 12 EXCEPT: THE PORTIONS OF SAID LOT 12 DEDICATED FOR ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY PER
DEEDS RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBERS 1972746 AND
1972747. HAVING AN AREA OF 11.10 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS,
CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 12 OF
PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580
THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-212
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH,
RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER
Page 151 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION BRASS
CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 18 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL
SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH
00°00'36" EAST ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 18 A DISTANCE OF 365.74 FEET TO THE
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SANDIFUR PARKWAY DEDICATED PER DEED RECORDED UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1977008 BEING A POINT ON THE ARC OF A NON
TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 850.08 FEET; THE RADIUS POINT
OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 12°41'19" EAST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID SOUTH RIGHT-
OF-WAY, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 189.01 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 12°44'21", A CHORD
BEARING OF SOUTH 83°40'51" EAST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 188.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH
89°56'58" EAST A DISTANCE OF 572.20 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED
RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE SOUTH
16°47'26" EAST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 95.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
00°00'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF 550.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°33'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF
399.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 510.05 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF
148.81 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 16°42'58", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 82°05'01" WEST,
AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 148.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST A DISTANCE OF 415.98
FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°58'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 240.92 FEET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF
LOT 15 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY; THENCE NORTH 00°00'36" EAST ALONG SAID
WEST BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 695.27 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING AN
AREA OF 13.81 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 19 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION
SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-218
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF
PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THE SOUTH 212.64 FEET OF LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL
SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316 AND THE NORTH 362.36 FEET OF LOT 14 OF SAID AMENDED
RECORD OF SURVEY. EXCEPT: THE PORTION OF SAID LOT 14 DEDICATED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-
WAY PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747.
HAVING AN AREA OF 11.23 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS,
EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 32 OF PLAT
EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH
582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
Page 152 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
115-210-213
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEM PT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST
BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 695.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°58'30" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 240.92 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°58'30" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 546.56 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST
ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 398.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°33'30" WEST
A DISTANCE OF 399.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO
THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 510.05 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC
LENGTH OF 148.81 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 16°42'58", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH
82°05'01" WEST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 148.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 415.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA OF 5.00 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF
RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 20 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN
VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE
NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-216
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A NAIL IN CONCRETE
IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF HARRIS ROAD AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH
89°33'30" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A
DISTANCE OF 1,764.25 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" WEST
ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARIES OF LOTS 12 AND 14 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY A
DISTANCE OF 1,396.42 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST
A DISTANCE OF 850.22 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST
ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 575.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 850.27 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA OF 11.22
ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND
Page 153 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 29 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION
SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-219
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST
QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF A DISTANCE
OF 1,804.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY
FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG
THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 1,414.43 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'24" EAST A DISTANCE OF 787.68 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER
1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF
718.95 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°58'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 787.48 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA OF 13.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS,
CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 34 OF
PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580
THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-217
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF
PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A NAIL IN CONCRETE
IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF HARRIS ROAD AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH
89°33'30" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A
DISTANCE OF 1,764.25 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" WEST
ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARIES OF LOTS 12 AND 14 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY A
DISTANCE OF 1,710.38 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF HARRIS ROAD AS SHOWN ON
SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE SOUTH
49°21'22" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 742.36 FEET TO THE EAST
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE
NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 42°58'57" WEST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY A
DISTANCE OF 420.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST A DISTANCE OF 489.67 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 90°00'00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 850.22 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING
AN AREA OF 11.43 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS
Page 154 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 30 OF PLAT EXEMPTION
SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-214
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST
BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 1,967.43 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 89°59'24" EAST A DISTANCE OF 787.83 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 552.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°59'24" WEST A DISTANCE OF 787.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
HAVING AN AREA OF 10.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS,
EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 21 OF PLAT EXEMPTION
SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-215
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST
BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 2,623.39 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
HARRIS ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY AND THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'38" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF
306.97 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE LEFT, HAVING
A RADIUS OF 950.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 504.37 FEET,
WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 30°25'10", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 74°47'47" EAST, AND A CHORD
LENGTH OF 498.47 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST ALONG
SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 525.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°59'24" WEST A
Page 155 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
DISTANCE OF 787.83 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH: A PARCEL OF
LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE
29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH IRON PIPE WITH NAIL IN CASE AT CENTERLINE OF HARRIS ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 89°59'38" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 2394.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH
89°59'38" EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 161.52 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 49°21'22" EAST A DISTANCE OF 311.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57°32'41" WEST A DISTANCE
OF 185.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,040.00 FEET; THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 30°28'01"
WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 263.75 FEET, WITH A DELTA
ANGLE OF 14°31'51", A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 66°47'54" WEST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF
263.05 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING A TOTAL COMBINED AREA OF 11.65
ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS
OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 22 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN
VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE
NUMBER 1989509)
Page 156 of 228
Resolution – Broadmoor TIF Sewer DRA - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR
BROADMOOR TIF UTILITY PACKAGE PROJECT .
WHEREAS, RCW 35.91 and Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter 14.25 establishes a
statutory framework that allows developers to enter into Developer Reimbursement Agreements
when they fund necessary infrastructure improvements as a condition of development; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.91.020 and PMC Section 14.25.070 further provides that
municipalities may exercise the same reimbursement rights as private developers when they
construct such improvements at their own expense; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has submitted a complete and accurate application for a
Developer Reimbursement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, PMC Section 14.25.030(4) requires the Public Works Director, within 28
days of receipt of a Developer Reimbursement Agreement application to provide notice to the
developer whether the application is complete or needs to be supplemented or amended within 30
days of such notice unless extended within the Public Works Director discretion; and
WHEREAS, notice of the complete application was provided to the applicant on
December 5, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City shall provide notice of its preliminary assessment reimbursement
area (those to repay the developer debt) to provide the property owners within the preliminary
assessment area the opportunity to request the matter be submitted to a public hearing, within 20
days of date of mailing of the notice, before Council action; and
WHEREAS, the City mailed notices of the preliminary assessment and reimbursement to
the property owners within the preliminary reimbursement area on October 30, 2024 , and did not
receive in writing a request for a hearing before Council; and
WHEREAS, utility system improvements include infrastructure projects related to City
water, sewer and storm sewer which are required to be constructed as a prerequisite of continued
development; and.
WHEREAS, utility system Developer Reimbursement Agreements requested by
developers shall be entered into by the City of Pasco pursuant to PMC Section 14.25.030(3) once
the prerequisite of Chapter 14.25 of the PMC have been met; and
Page 157 of 228
Resolution – Broadmoor TIF Sewer DRA - 2
WHEREAS, utility Developer Reimbursement Agreements shall meet the development
criteria as detailed in PMC Section 14.25.030(3)(b); and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco agrees to payment of project costs, including legal and
administrative costs, as set forth in the Developer Reimbursement Agreement, attached as Exhibit
A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the Interim City Manager is authorized to execute the Developer Reimbursement
Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the Interim City Manager be authorized to make minor
substantive changes to the Agreement as needed.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 158 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF:
City of Pasco, Washington
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Pasco, Washington
525 North 3rd Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
AGREEMENT# AGRMT2023-046s
Additional Parcels and Full Legal Descriptions attached hereto as Exhibit (C)
CITY OF PASCO
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
RCW 35.91 - Broadmoor TIF-Utility Package Project
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of___________, 2025,
by and between the City of Pasco, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as “City”, and the property owners listed on Exhibit (A) hereinafter called “Owner”;
and
WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 35.91 gives cities the authority to finance the construction of
Utility infrastructure, to assess benefited properties for pro rata share of construction costs, and to
collect reimbursements from property owners who connect to the system within twenty (20) years;
and
WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 35.91 and PMC 14.25.070 authorize the City to partner with
interested parties in financing development of Utility facilities, and to receive developer
reimbursements for City expenditures on same; and
WHEREAS, the City has, by Resolution_______ adopted by City Council on the _______
day of ______________, 2025, approved the reimbursement agreement for the construction of the
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Package Project by the City to a certain tract of land and established a
preliminary assessment reimbursement area and preliminary pro rata share of costs;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
1. The City constructed, at their expense, the Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project as per
construction plans signed and approved by the Public Works Director, or his/her designee.
The Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project will:
Page 159 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
Beginning approximately 250-feet west of the Sandifur Parkway and
Broadmoor Boulevard intersection and heading west along the Sandifur
Parkway road section approximately 3,300 linear feet, terminating at the
western edge of parcel 115-210-048. Additionally, the project picks up the
main extension at the intersection of Sandifur Parkway and Road 108 and
heading south within the Road 108 road section approximately 2,900-feet
connecting to the existing 30-inch trunk main within Harris Road. The
project is installing 12-inch PVC sewer within the Sandifur Parkway section
between Broadmoor Boulevard and future Road 105 and 15-inch PVC
sewer main between the Road 105 intersection and western parcel line of
115-210-048. Within the Road 108 roadway section, this project is
installing 12-inch PVC sewer main. In addition to the sewer main
extensions, the project is also installing tee fixtures and extensions with caps
at all future locations where sewer main extensions have been deemed
necessary for future development.
The facilities subject to this Agreement are included within the City's comprehensive utility
plan for the properties in Exhibit (B), and no additional comprehensive plan approval for
the utility system improvements was required. The facility was constructed in accordance
with the City Standard Specifications and Drawings in effect governing the construction
and specifications for facilities of such type, and subject to the approval of the Public
Works Director, or his/her designee. The City has determined a final “Assessment Area”
showing the benefiting parcels to be served by the facility, which is determined at the sole
discretion of the City, and which are identified and legally described in Exhibit (C)
2. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreements associated with utility system
improvements shall be valid for a period not to exceed twenty (20) years from the effective
date of the agreement.
While a developer agreement is valid, any person, firm or corporation now or hereafter
owning benefitted properties described below, or segregated parcels thereof, desiring to
connect to the described facilities, shall first pay their pro-rata share of the total cost of the
facilities (“Total Assessment”). For this project, the Total Assessment is shown in
Exhibit(A). The individual Assessment associated with each parcel of benefited property
described in this Agreement shall be charged to the property owner as shown in Exhibit
(A).
3. With the completion of construction of the facility and its acceptance by the Public Works
Director, or his/her designee, and Council’s adoption of this Developer Reimbursement
Agreement, the City shall record latecomer assessments against all benefiting properties in
the assessment reimbursement area (“Latecomer Fees”), and the facility will become a part
of the municipal system of the City. Maintenance and operation costs of the said facilities
will be borne by the City, except for work and corrections covered by the contractor’s one-
year warranty bond.
Page 160 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
4. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that with the completion of
construction and Council adoption of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement, no
person, firm or corporation owning property within the assessment reimbursement area
shall be granted a permit or be authorized by City to connect to or use the referenced
facilities during the period of time prescribed in Paragraph 2 above without first paying to
City, in addition to any and all other costs, assessments and charges made and assessed for
such tap or use, the amount required by the provisions of this contract. All amounts so
received by the City shall be used to reimburse the Water Utility Fund for the capital
improvement. After the expiration of the time prescribed in Paragraph 2 of the agreement,
City standard fees in effect at the time, will apply.
5. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that following passage of the
Developer Reimbursement Agreement by City Council, whenever any connection is made
onto the facility described in Paragraph 1 under the contract without such payment having
first been made in accordance with Exhibit (A), the City may remove or cause to be
removed, such unauthorized connection and all connected lines or pipe located in the
facility right-of-way, and dispose of such material removed without any liability
whatsoever.
6. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that following passage of this
Developer Reimbursement Agreement by City Council, and upon recording said
Developer Reimbursement Agreement with the appropriate county auditor's office within
thirty (30) days of its final execution, the terms of said Agreement shall run with the land
contained within the assessment reimbursement area and bind subsequent owners of the
properties affected
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and
year first above written.
received by the City shall be used to reimburse the Water/Sewer Utility fund for the capital
improvement. after the expiration of the time prescribed in paragraph 2 of the agreement,
City standard fees in effect at the time, will apply.
Page 161 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager
ATTEST:
Debra C. Barham, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC, City Attorney
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
: ss
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN )
On this day personally appeared before me DAVE ZABELL, Interim City Manager of the
City of Pasco, Washington, described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ___ day of ______________, 2025.
________________________________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Print Name: _____________________________
Residing at _______________________________
My Commission Expires: ___________________
Page 162 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
EXHIBIT A
SE
W
E
R
PE
R
M
I
T
#
P
a
r
c
e
l
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
[
F
T
]
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
Co
s
t
[
%
]
=
[(
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
Pa
r
c
e
l
Fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
[F
T
]
)
/
(
T
o
t
a
l
Pa
r
c
e
l
Fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
[F
T
]
)
]
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
s
t
[
$
]
=
(
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
s
t
[%
]
)
*
(
T
o
t
a
l
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
)
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
3
4
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
86
3
6.
9
7
%
46
,
5
6
7
.
9
9
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
3
5
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
86
0
6.
9
5
%
46
,
4
0
6
.
1
1
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
3
6
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
90
2
7.
2
8
%
48
,
6
7
2
.
4
5
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
4
0
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
11
8
8
9.
5
9
%
64
,
1
0
5
.
1
8
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
4
1
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
50
0
4.
0
4
%
26
,
9
8
0
.
3
0
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
1
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
70
1
5.
6
6
%
37
,
8
2
6
.
3
7
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
8
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
73
6
5.
9
4
%
39
,
7
1
5
.
0
0
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
6
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
73
6
5.
9
4
%
39
,
7
1
5
.
0
0
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
7
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
13
3
0
10
.
7
4
%
71
,
7
6
7
.
5
9
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
2
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
82
1
6.
6
3
%
44
,
3
0
1
.
6
5
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
3
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
44
8
3.
6
2
%
24
,
1
7
4
.
3
4
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
9
PA
S
C
O
P
U
B
L
I
C
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
95
1
7.
6
8
%
51
,
3
1
6
.
5
2
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
4
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
72
7
5.
8
7
%
39
,
2
2
9
.
3
5
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
5
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
78
3
6.
3
2
%
42
,
2
5
1
.
1
4
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
5
3
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
39
9
3.
2
2
%
21
,
5
3
0
.
2
8
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
5
8
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
43
8
3.
5
4
%
23
,
6
3
4
.
7
4
$
TO
T
A
L
S
:
12
3
8
3
10
0
.
0
0
%
66
8
,
1
9
4
.
0
0
$
66
8
,
1
9
4
.
0
0
$
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
S
E
W
E
R
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
AG
M
N
T
2
0
2
3
-
0
4
6
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
To
t
a
l
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
12
3
8
3
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
o
f
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
$6
6
8
,
1
9
4
.
0
0
Be
n
e
f
i
t
A
r
e
a
Pa
r
c
e
l
#
,
O
w
n
e
r
LA
T
E
C
O
M
E
R
A
M
O
U
N
T
:
Page 163 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
EXHIBIT B
Page 164 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
EXHIBIT C
SEWER
BENNEFITTING PARCELS
115-210-034
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 7; LOT 4 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-035
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; LOT 5 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-036
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; LOT 6 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-040
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; LOT 10 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-041
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; LOT 11 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-211
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND
THE NORTHWEST OF THE SOUTHEAST OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF
THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON,
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR
EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316. EXCEPT: THE SOUTH 212.64 FEET OF SAID
LOT 12 EXCEPT: THE PORTIONS OF SAID LOT 12 DEDICATED FOR ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY PER
DEEDS RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBERS 1972746 AND
1972747. HAVING AN AREA OF 11.10 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS,
CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 12 OF
PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580
THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-212
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH,
Page 165 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION BRASS
CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 18 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL
SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH
00°00'36" EAST ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 18 A DISTANCE OF 365.74 FEET TO THE
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SANDIFUR PARKWAY DEDICATED PER DEED RECORDED UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1977008 BEING A POINT ON THE ARC OF A NON
TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 850.08 FEET; THE RADIUS POINT
OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 12°41'19" EAST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID SOUTH RIGHT-
OF-WAY, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 189.01 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 12°44'21", A CHORD
BEARING OF SOUTH 83°40'51" EAST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 188.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH
89°56'58" EAST A DISTANCE OF 572.20 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED
RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE SOUTH
16°47'26" EAST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 95.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
00°00'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF 550.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°33'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF
399.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 510.05 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF
148.81 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 16°42'58", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 82°05'01" WEST,
AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 148.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST A DISTANCE OF 415.98
FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°58'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 240.92 FEET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF
LOT 15 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY; THENCE NORTH 00°00'36" EAST ALONG SAID
WEST BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 695.27 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING AN
AREA OF 13.81 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 19 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION
SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-218
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF
PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THE SOUTH 212.64 FEET OF LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL
SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316 AND THE NORTH 362.36 FEET OF LOT 14 OF SAID AMENDED
RECORD OF SURVEY. EXCEPT: THE PORTION OF SAID LOT 14 DEDICATED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-
WAY PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747.
HAVING AN AREA OF 11.23 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS,
EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 32 OF PLAT
Page 166 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH
582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-213
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST
BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 695.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°58'30" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 240.92 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°58'30" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 546.56 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST
ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 398.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°33'30" WEST
A DISTANCE OF 399.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO
THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 510.05 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC
LENGTH OF 148.81 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 16°42'58", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH
82°05'01" WEST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 148.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 415.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA OF 5.00 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF
RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 20 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN
VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE
NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-216
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A NAIL IN CONCRETE
IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF HARRIS ROAD AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH
89°33'30" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A
DISTANCE OF 1,764.25 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" WEST
ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARIES OF LOTS 12 AND 14 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY A
DISTANCE OF 1,396.42 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST
A DISTANCE OF 850.22 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST
ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 575.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" EAST A
Page 167 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
DISTANCE OF 850.27 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA OF 11.22
ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 29 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION
SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-219
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST
QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF A DISTANCE
OF 1,804.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY
FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG
THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 1,414.43 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'24" EAST A DISTANCE OF 787.68 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER
1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF
718.95 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°58'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 787.48 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA OF 13.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS,
CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 34 OF
PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580
THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-217
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF
PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A NAIL IN CONCRETE
IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF HARRIS ROAD AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH
89°33'30" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A
DISTANCE OF 1,764.25 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" WEST
ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARIES OF LOTS 12 AND 14 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY A
DISTANCE OF 1,710.38 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF HARRIS ROAD AS SHOWN ON
SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE SOUTH
49°21'22" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 742.36 FEET TO THE EAST
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE
NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 42°58'57" WEST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY A
DISTANCE OF 420.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST A DISTANCE OF 489.67 FEET; THENCE
Page 168 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
NORTH 90°00'00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 850.22 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING
AN AREA OF 11.43 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS
AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 30 OF PLAT EXEMPTION
SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-214
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST
BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 1,967.43 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 89°59'24" EAST A DISTANCE OF 787.83 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 552.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°59'24" WEST A DISTANCE OF 787.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
HAVING AN AREA OF 10.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS,
EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 21 OF PLAT EXEMPTION
SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-215
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST
BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 2,623.39 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
HARRIS ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY AND THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'38" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF
306.97 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE LEFT, HAVING
A RADIUS OF 950.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 504.37 FEET,
WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 30°25'10", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 74°47'47" EAST, AND A CHORD
Page 169 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
LENGTH OF 498.47 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST ALONG
SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 525.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°59'24" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 787.83 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH: A PARCEL OF
LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE
29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH IRON PIPE WITH NAIL IN CASE AT CENTERLINE OF HARRIS ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 89°59'38" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 2394.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH
89°59'38" EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 161.52 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 49°21'22" EAST A DISTANCE OF 311.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57°32'41" WEST A DISTANCE
OF 185.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,040.00 FEET; THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 30°28'01"
WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 263.75 FEET, WITH A DELTA
ANGLE OF 14°31'51", A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 66°47'54" WEST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF
263.05 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING A TOTAL COMBINED AREA OF 11.65
ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS
OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 22 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN
VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE
NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-053
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 7 OF AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'19" EAST
ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 7 A DISTANCE OF 947.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH
89°57'42" EAST A DISTANCE OF 422.95 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE
TURNING TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.03 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING
AN ARC LENGTH OF 28.71 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 05°29'00", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH
87°13'12" EAST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 28.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84°28'42" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 98.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'33" EAST A DISTANCE OF 714.22 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 89°59'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 342.86 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUING NORTH 89°59'41 " EAST A DISTANCE OF 394.36 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF
SAID LOT 7; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'19" EAST ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 7 AND
CONTINUING ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 17 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY
FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION A DISTANCE OF 490.71 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF SANDIFUR PARKWAY DEDICATED PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972746; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED
Page 170 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
PER SAID DEED AND ALONG THE CONTINUATION TO THE WEST THEREOF DEDICATED PER DEED
RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1977008, THE FOLLOWING
COURSES: THENCE SOUTH 89°59'41" WEST A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'19"
EAST A DISTANCE OF 36.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56°58'06" WEST A DISTANCE OF 64.25 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 39°56'58" WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.48 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH 00°00'19" WEST A DISTANCE OF 562.05 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING. (LOT 17 PER RS-1986333)
115-210-058
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 7; A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 7 OF AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'19" EAST
ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 7 A DISTANCE OF 947.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH
89°57'42" EAST A DISTANCE OF 422.95 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE
TURNING TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.03 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING
AN ARC LENGTH GP 28.71 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 05°29‘00", A CHORD BEARING OF
NORTH 87°13'12" EAST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 28.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84°28‘42" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 98.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'33" EAST A DISTANCE OF 714.22 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89°59'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 342.86 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°00'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF 562.05 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
SANDIFUR PARKWAY DEDICATED PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S
FILE NUMBER 1977008; THENCE SOUTH 89°56'58" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY A
DISTANCE OF 255.45 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO
THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 750.07 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND CONTINUING
ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT—OF—WAY, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 179.24 FEET, WITH A DELTA
ANGLE OF 13°41'31", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 83°12'16"WEST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF
178.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 09°27'14" EAST A DISTANCE OF 548.54 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING. (LOT 36 OF RS-1986333)
Page 171 of 228
Resolution – Broadmoor TIF Water DRA - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF DOMESTIC WATER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR
BROADMOOR TIF UTILITY PACKAGE PROJECT .
WHEREAS, RCW 35.91 and Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter 14.25 establishes a
statutory framework that allows developers to enter into Developer Reimbursement Agreements
when they fund necessary infrastructure improvements as a condition of development; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.91.020 and PMC Section 14.25.070 further provides that
municipalities may exercise the same reimbursement rights as private developers when they
construct such improvements at their own expense; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has submitted a complete and accurate application for a
Developer Reimbursement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, PMC Section 14.25.030(4) requires the Public Works Director, within 28
days of receipt of a Developer Reimbursement Agreement application to provide notice to the
developer whether the application is complete or needs to be supplemented or amended within 30
days of such notice unless extended within the Public Works Director’s discretion; and
WHEREAS, notice of the complete application was provided to the applicant on
December 5, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City shall provide notice of its preliminary assessment reimbursement
area (those to repay the developer debt) to provide the property owners within the preliminary
assessment area the opportunity to request the matter be submitted to a public hearing, within 20
days of date of mailing of the notice, before Council action; and
WHEREAS, the City mailed notices of the preliminary assessment and reimbursement to
the property owners within the preliminary reimbursement area on October 30, 2024 , and did not
receive in writing a request for a hearing before Council; and
WHEREAS, utility system improvements include infrastructure projects related to City
water, sewer and storm sewer which are required to be constructed as a prerequisite of continued
development; and
WHEREAS, utility system Developer Reimbursement Agreements requested by
developers shall be entered into by the City of Pasco pursuant to PMC Section 14.25.030(3) once
the prerequisite of Chapter 14.25 of the PMC have been met; and
Page 172 of 228
Resolution – Broadmoor TIF Water DRA - 2
WHEREAS, utility Developer Reimbursement Agreements shall meet the development
criteria as detailed in PMC Section 14.25.030(3)(b); and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco agrees to payment of project costs, including legal and
administrative costs, as set forth in the Developer Reimbursement Agreement, attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the Interim City Manager is authorized to execute the Developer Reimbursement
Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the Interim City Manager be authorized to make minor
substantive changes to the Developer Reimbursement Agreement as needed.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 173 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF:
City of Pasco, Washington
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Pasco, Washington
525 North 3rd Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
AGREEMENT# AGRMT2023-043w
Additional Parcels and Full Legal Descriptions attached hereto as Exhibit (C)
CITY OF PASCO
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
RCW 35.91 - Broadmoor TIF-Utility Package Project
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of___________, 2025,
by and between the City of Pasco, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as “City”, and the property owners listed on Exhibit (A) hereinafter called “Owner”;
and
WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 35.91 gives cities the authority to finance the construction of
Utility infrastructure, to assess benefited properties for pro rata share of construction costs, and to
collect reimbursements from property owners who connect to the system within twenty (20) years;
and
WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 35.91 and PMC 14.25.070 authorize the City to partner with
interested parties in financing development of Utility facilities, and to receive developer
reimbursements for City expenditures on same; and
WHEREAS, the City has, by Resolution_______ adopted by City Council on the _______
day of ______________, 2025, approved the reimbursement agreement for the construction of the
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Package Project by the City to a certain tract of land and established a
preliminary assessment reimbursement area and preliminary pro rata share of costs;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
1. The City constructed, at their expense, the Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project as per
construction plans signed and approved by the Public Works Director, or his/her designee.
The Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project will:
Page 174 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
This project begins at the southeast corner of parcel 115-210-041 where it
intercepts the extension of the existing 24-inch water trunk line, thence
heads north 864-feet to the future Sandifur Parkway right-of-way. From
there the water main is extended east 1,200-feet to the intersection of
Sandifur Parkway and Broadmoor Boulevard and west 1,500 feet to the
intersection of Sandifur Parkway and Road 108. From that intersection the
water main is extended south 2,900-feet where it dead-ends within the
Harris Road and Road 108 to be connected in the future with a main line
installed for the same pressure zone. The project also includes the
installation of Nineteen (19) fire hydrants, a 12-inch pressure reducing
valve and tee extensions with blow-offs for future main extensions
throughout the Broadmoor Area. The water main sizes being installed with
this project are 12-inch within the Road 108 section and 12-inch and 24-
inch within the Sandifur Parkway section. The benefitting parcels are being
assessed the value of the 12-inch water main size as this was determined to
be required to serve the Broadmoor Area.
The facilities subject to this Agreement are included within the City's comprehensive utility
plan for the properties in Exhibit (B), and no additional comprehensive plan approval for
the utility system improvements was required. The facility was constructed in accordance
with the City Standard Specifications and Drawings in effect governing the construction
and specifications for facilities of such type, and subject to the approval of the Public
Works Director, or his/her designee. The City has determined a final “Assessment Area”
showing the benefiting parcels to be served by the facility, which is determined at the sole
discretion of the City, and which are identified and legally described in Exhibit (C)
2. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreements associated with utility system
improvements shall be valid for a period not to exceed twenty (20) years from the effective
date of the agreement.
While a developer agreement is valid, any person, firm or corporation now or hereafter
owning benefitted properties described below, or segregated parcels thereof, desiring to
connect to the described facilities, shall first pay their pro-rata share of the total cost of the
facilities (“Total Assessment”). For this project, the Total Assessment is shown in
Exhibit(A). The individual Assessment associated with each parcel of benefited property
described in this Agreement shall be charged to the property owner as shown in Exhibit
(A).
3. With the completion of construction of the facility and its acceptance by the Public Works
Director, or his/her designee, and Council’s adoption of this Developer Reimbursement
Agreement, the City shall record latecomer assessments against all benefiting properties in
the assessment reimbursement area (“Latecomer Fees”), and the facility will become a part
of the municipal system of the City. Maintenance and operation costs of the said facilities
Page 175 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
will be borne by the City, except for work and corrections covered by the contractor’s one-
year warranty bond.
4. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that with the completion of
construction and Council adoption of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement, no
person, firm or corporation owning property within the assessment reimbursement area
shall be granted a permit or be authorized by City to connect to or use the referenced
facilities during the period of time prescribed in Paragraph 2 above without first paying to
City, in addition to any and all other costs, assessments and charges made and assessed for
such tap or use, the amount required by the provisions of this contract. All amounts so
received by the City shall be used to reimburse the Water/Sewer Utility Fund for the capital
improvement. After the expiration of the time prescribed in Paragraph 2 of the agreement,
City standard fees in effect at the time, will apply.
5. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that following passage of the
Developer Reimbursement Agreement by City Council, whenever any connection is made
onto the facility described in Paragraph 1 under the contract without such payment having
first been made in accordance with Exhibit (A), the City may remove or cause to be
removed, such unauthorized connection and all connected lines or pipe located in the
facility right-of-way, and dispose of such material removed without any liability
whatsoever.
6. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that following passage of this
Developer Reimbursement Agreement by City Council, and upon recording said
Developer Reimbursement Agreement with the appropriate county auditor's office within
thirty (30) days of its final execution, the terms of said Agreement shall run with the land
contained within the assessment reimbursement area and bind subsequent owners of the
properties affected
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and
year first above written.
Page 176 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager
ATTEST:
Debra C. Barham, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC, City Attorney
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
: ss
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN )
On this day personally appeared before me DAVE ZABELL, Interim City Manager of the
City of Pasco, Washington, described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ___ day of ______________, 2025.
________________________________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Print Name: _____________________________
Residing at _______________________________
My Commission Expires: ___________________
Page 177 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
EXHIBIT A
W
A
T
E
R
PE
R
M
I
T
#
P
a
r
c
e
l
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
[
F
T
]
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
Co
s
t
[
%
]
=
[(
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
Pa
r
c
e
l
Fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
[F
T
]
)
/
(
T
o
t
a
l
Pa
r
c
e
l
Fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
[F
T
]
)
]
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
s
t
[
$
]
=
(
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
s
t
[%
]
)
*
(
T
o
t
a
l
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
)
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
3
4
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
86
3
6.
4
8
%
98
,
7
9
1
.
8
0
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
3
5
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
86
0
6.
4
5
%
98
,
4
4
8
.
3
8
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
3
6
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
90
2
6.
7
7
%
10
3
,
2
5
6
.
3
2
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
4
0
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
19
7
8
14
.
8
4
%
22
6
,
4
3
1
.
2
6
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
0
4
1
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
14
9
0
11
.
1
8
%
17
0
,
5
6
7
.
5
3
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
1
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
70
1
5.
2
6
%
80
,
2
4
6
.
8
7
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
2
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
82
1
6.
1
6
%
93
,
9
8
3
.
8
6
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
8
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
73
6
5.
5
2
%
84
,
2
5
3
.
4
9
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
3
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
44
8
3.
3
6
%
51
,
2
8
4
.
7
4
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
6
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
73
6
5.
5
2
%
84
,
2
5
3
.
4
9
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
9
PA
S
C
O
P
U
B
L
I
C
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
95
1
7.
1
4
%
10
8
,
8
6
5
.
5
9
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
7
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
13
3
0
9.
9
8
%
15
2
,
2
5
1
.
5
6
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
4
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
72
7
5.
4
6
%
83
,
2
2
3
.
2
2
$
11
5
-
2
1
0
-
2
1
5
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
C
E
L
78
3
5.
8
8
%
89
,
6
3
3
.
8
1
$
TO
T
A
L
S
:
13
3
2
6
10
0
.
0
0
%
1,
5
2
5
,
4
9
1
.
9
2
$
1,
5
2
5
,
4
9
1
.
9
2
$
AG
M
N
T
2
0
2
3
-
0
4
3
w
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
To
t
a
l
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
13
3
2
6
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
o
f
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
$1
,
5
2
5
,
4
9
1
.
9
2
Be
n
e
f
i
t
A
r
e
a
Pa
r
c
e
l
#
,
O
w
n
e
r
LA
T
E
C
O
M
E
R
A
M
O
U
N
T
:
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
W
A
T
E
R
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
Page 178 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
EXHIBIT B
Page 179 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
EXHIBIT C
WATER
BENNEFITTING PARCELS
115-210-034
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 7; LOT 4 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-035
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; LOT 5 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-036
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; LOT 6 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-040
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; LOT 10 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-041
TOWNSHIP 9 RANGE 29 SECTION 07; LOT 11 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 EXCEPT PORTION
DEEDED FOR ROAD RW-1972746
115-210-211
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND
THE NORTHWEST OF THE SOUTHEAST OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF
THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON,
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR
EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316. EXCEPT: THE SOUTH 212.64 FEET OF SAID
LOT 12 EXCEPT: THE PORTIONS OF SAID LOT 12 DEDICATED FOR ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY PER
DEEDS RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBERS 1972746 AND
1972747. HAVING AN AREA OF 11.10 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS,
CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 12 OF
PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580
THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-212
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH,
RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER
Page 180 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION BRASS
CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 18 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL
SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH
00°00'36" EAST ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 18 A DISTANCE OF 365.74 FEET TO THE
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SANDIFUR PARKWAY DEDICATED PER DEED RECORDED UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1977008 BEING A POINT ON THE ARC OF A NON
TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 850.08 FEET; THE RADIUS POINT
OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 12°41'19" EAST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID SOUTH RIGHT-
OF-WAY, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 189.01 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 12°44'21", A CHORD
BEARING OF SOUTH 83°40'51" EAST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 188.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH
89°56'58" EAST A DISTANCE OF 572.20 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED
RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE SOUTH
16°47'26" EAST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 95.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
00°00'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF 550.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°33'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF
399.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 510.05 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF
148.81 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 16°42'58", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 82°05'01" WEST,
AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 148.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST A DISTANCE OF 415.98
FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°58'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 240.92 FEET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF
LOT 15 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY; THENCE NORTH 00°00'36" EAST ALONG SAID
WEST BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 695.27 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING AN
AREA OF 13.81 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 19 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION
SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-218
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF
PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THE SOUTH 212.64 FEET OF LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL
SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316 AND THE NORTH 362.36 FEET OF LOT 14 OF SAID AMENDED
RECORD OF SURVEY. EXCEPT: THE PORTION OF SAID LOT 14 DEDICATED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-
WAY PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747.
HAVING AN AREA OF 11.23 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS,
EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 32 OF PLAT
EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH
582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
Page 181 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
115-210-213
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST
BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 695.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°58'30" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 240.92 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°58'30" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 546.56 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST
ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 398.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°33'30" WEST
A DISTANCE OF 399.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO
THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 510.05 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC
LENGTH OF 148.81 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 16°42'58", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH
82°05'01" WEST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 148.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 415.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA OF 5.00 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF
RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 20 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN
VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE
NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-216
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A NAIL IN CONCRETE
IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF HARRIS ROAD AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH
89°33'30" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A
DISTANCE OF 1,764.25 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" WEST
ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARIES OF LOTS 12 AND 14 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY A
DISTANCE OF 1,396.42 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST
A DISTANCE OF 850.22 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST
ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 575.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 850.27 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA OF 11.22
ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 29 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION
Page 182 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-219
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST
QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF A DISTANCE
OF 1,804.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY
FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG
THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 1,414.43 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'24" EAST A DISTANCE OF 787.68 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER
1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF
718.95 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°58'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 787.48 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA OF 13.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS,
CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 34 OF
PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580
THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-217
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF
PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A NAIL IN CONCRETE
IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF HARRIS ROAD AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH
89°33'30" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A
DISTANCE OF 1,764.25 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271
UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" WEST
ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARIES OF LOTS 12 AND 14 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY A
DISTANCE OF 1,710.38 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF HARRIS ROAD AS SHOWN ON
SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE SOUTH
49°21'22" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 742.36 FEET TO THE EAST
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE
NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 42°58'57" WEST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY A
DISTANCE OF 420.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST A DISTANCE OF 489.67 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 90°00'00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 850.22 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING
AN AREA OF 11.43 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS
AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 30 OF PLAT EXEMPTION
Page 183 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-214
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST
BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 1,967.43 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 89°59'24" EAST A DISTANCE OF 787.83 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 552.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°59'24" WEST A DISTANCE OF 787.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
HAVING AN AREA OF 10.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS,
EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 21 OF PLAT EXEMPTION
SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)
115-210-215
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN
COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST
BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 2,623.39 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
HARRIS ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY AND THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'38" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF
306.97 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE LEFT, HAVING
A RADIUS OF 950.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 504.37 FEET,
WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF 30°25'10", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 74°47'47" EAST, AND A CHORD
LENGTH OF 498.47 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST ALONG
SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 525.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°59'24" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 787.83 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH: A PARCEL OF
LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE
Page 184 of 228
Broadmoor TIF-Utility Project
Developer Services Agreement
Version 11.05.2024
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE
29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH IRON PIPE WITH NAIL IN CASE AT CENTERLINE OF HARRIS ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 89°59'38" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 2394.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH
89°59'38" EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 161.52 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 49°21'22" EAST A DISTANCE OF 311.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57°32'41" WEST A DISTANCE
OF 185.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,040.00 FEET; THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 30°28'01"
WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 263.75 FEET, WITH A DELTA
ANGLE OF 14°31'51", A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 66°47'54" WEST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF
263.05 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING A TOTAL COMBINED AREA OF 11.65
ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS
OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS NEW LOT 22 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN
VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE
NUMBER 1989509)
Page 185 of 228
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 2, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 6/9/25
FROM: Brian Cartwright, Division Manager
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Resolutions - Approving two (2) Developer Reimbursement Agreements
for Sports Street “A” the improvements associated utility the with
Complex Project (5 minute staff presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Presentation
Resolutions
Exhibit-Development Reimbursement Agreements
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion/Presentation
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
As a condition of development for Parcel #112-462-024, the City of Pasco—
acting in the capacity of developer—was required to construct utility
improvements that would also benefit adjacent properties. To recover the
proportionate share of costs associated with this benefit, the City submitted
Latecomer’s applications for two separate utility systems: water and sewer.
City the Project, Complex Sports part “A” the of installed As Street
approximately 462 linear feet of 12-inch water main and 660 linear feet of 8-
inch sewer main within the South Elm Street right-of-way. These improvements
fulfilled the City’s “to and through” utility extension requirements for the Sports
Complex and also extended service to three neighboring parcels—two on the
west side of South Elm Street and one on the east.
Construction of the improvements has been completed and formally accepted
Page 186 of 228
by the City. The final construction costs were submitted by the City (as
Developer), reviewed by City staff (as Administrator), and found to be accurate
and consistent with the completed work.
V. DISCUSSION:
RCW 35.91 authorizes municipalities to enter into reimbursement contracts
with property owners who construct water or sewer facilities at their own
expense. This law allows developers to recover a proportionate share of costs
from other property owners who later benefit from the infrastructure. Under
RCW 35.91.020, municipalities may also exercise these reimbursement rights
when acting as developers themselves.
Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter 14.25 codifies this authority and outlines
the reimbursement developer (latecomer) for procedures establishing
private agreements. While these agreements are typically initiated by
developers, PMC 14.25.070 explicitly authorizes the City to do the same when
utility improvements are constructed to support future development.
In this case, the City initiated latecomer agreements for utility improvements
completed as While Project. Complex Sports the “A” the of part Street
infrastructure serves City-owned property, it also benefits nearby privately
owned parcels. The benefit area and cost allocations have been evaluated and
verified in accordance with all applicable statutory and code requirements. All
noticing and procedural steps required under RCW 35.91 and PMC 14.25 have
been satisfied.
Staff Developer recommends that City Council approve the final
Reimbursement Agreements for the water and sewer improvements associated
with the “A” Street Sports Complex Project. Upon approval, the agreements will
be executed by the City Manager in accordance with PMC Chapter 14.25.
Page 187 of 228
June 9, 2025
Pasco City Council
Workshop
Pa
g
e
1
8
8
o
f
2
2
8
City Initiated Developer
Reimbursement
Agreements –Broadmoor
TIF Area Utility
June 9, 2025
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
1
8
9
o
f
2
2
8
General Information
3
Pa
g
e
1
9
0
o
f
2
2
8
What is a Developer’s Reimbursement agreement?
4
• When a developer builds a public utility that benefits others at their own
expense, they can be reimbursed.
• Per PMC 14.25.070, the City can act as a developer when we build utilities
to support future growth.
• Benefitting property owners help repay the cost of the initial investment.
Pa
g
e
1
9
1
o
f
2
2
8
Legal Framework
5
• RCW.91: State law allows
reimbursement of cost for utility
improvements.
• PMC 14.25: Pasco’s local code
that follows state law.
• These rules ensure that costs are
shared fairly among those who
benefit.
Pa
g
e
1
9
2
o
f
2
2
8
Broadmoor TIF Area Utility -
Developer Reimbursement
Agreement
6
Pa
g
e
1
9
3
o
f
2
2
8
Broadmoor TIF Area Utility Package
7
• The City built water, sewer, and
irrigation improvements along Sandifur
Parkway and Road 108.
• These improvements support future
private development-not City-owned
property.
•Utilities built:
•Water ≈ 8,300 LF pipe, 19 fire hydrants, 1
pressure reducing station
•Sewer ≈ 7,075 feet of pipe, 23 manholes
•Irrigation ≈ 6,175 feet of pipe, 10 service
connections
Pa
g
e
1
9
4
o
f
2
2
8
Broadmoor TIF Area Utility Package
8
Pa
g
e
1
9
5
o
f
2
2
8
Summary and Next Steps
9
Pa
g
e
1
9
6
o
f
2
2
8
Summary and Next Steps
10
• The City invested in infrastructure to support future growth.
• Reimbursement Agreements allow the City to recover part of
the costs from benefitting property owners.
• Developer Reimbursement Agreements are executed by the
City Manager.
• Staff recommends approval of the Resolutions authorizing the
City Manager to execute 3 Developer Reimbursement
Agreements
Pa
g
e
1
9
7
o
f
2
2
8
Questions?Pa
g
e
1
9
8
o
f
2
2
8
Resolution - A Street Sports Complex – Sewer DRA - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR
“A” STREET SPORTS COMPLEX PROJECT.
WHEREAS, RCW 35.91 and Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter 14.25 establishes a
statutory framework that allows developers to enter into Developer Reimbursement Agreements
when they fund necessary infrastructure improvements as a condition of development; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.91.020 and PMC Section 14.25.070 further provides that
municipalities may exercise the same reimbursement rights as private developers when they
construct such improvements at their own expense; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has submitted a complete and accurate application for a
Developer Reimbursement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, PMC Section 14.25.030(4) requires the Public Works Director, within 28
days of receipt of a Developer Reimbursement Agreement application to provide notice to the
developer whether the application is complete or needs to be supplemented or amended within 30
days of such notice unless extended within the Public Works Director’s discretion; and
WHEREAS, notice of the complete application was provided to the applicant on February
21, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City shall provide notice of its preliminary assessment reimbursement
area (those to repay the developer debt) to provide the property owners within the preliminary
assessment area the opportunity to request the matter be submitted to a public hearing, within 20
days of date of mailing of the notice, before Council action; and
WHEREAS, the City mailed notices of the preliminary assessment and reimbursement to
the property owners within the preliminary reimbursement area on March 6, 2024, and did not
receive in writing a request for a hearing before Council; and
WHEREAS, utility system improvements include infrastructure projects related to City
water, irrigation, sewer and storm sewer which are required to be constructed as a prerequisite of
continued development; and.
WHEREAS, utility system Developer Reimbursement Agreements requested by
developers shall be entered into by the City of Pasco pursuant to PMC Section 14.25.030(3) once
the prerequisite of Chapter 14.25 have been met; and
Page 199 of 228
Resolution - A Street Sports Complex – Sewer DRA - 2
WHEREAS, utility Developer Reimbursement Agreements shall meet the development
criteria as detailed in PMC Section14.25.030(3)(b); and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco agrees to payment of project costs, including legal and
administrative costs, as set forth in the Developer Reimbursement Agreement, attached as Exhibit
A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the Interim City Manager is authorized to execute the Developer Reimbursement
Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the Interim City Manager be authorized to make minor
substantive changes to the Agreement as needed.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 200 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF:
City of Pasco, Washington
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Pasco, Washington
525 North 3rd Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
AGREEMENT# AGRMT2023-040s
Additional Parcels and Full Legal Descriptions attached hereto as Exhibit (C)
CITY OF PASCO
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
RCW 35.91 – A STREET SPORTS COMPLEX
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of___________, 2025,
by and between the City of Pasco, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as “City”, and the property owners listed on Exhibit (A) hereinafter called “Owner”;
and
WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 35.91 gives cities the authority to finance the construction of
Utility infrastructure, to assess benefited properties for pro rata share of construction costs, and to
collect reimbursements from property owners who connect to the system within twenty (20) years;
and
WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 35.91 and PMC 14.25.070 authorize the City to partner with
interested parties in financing development of Utility facilities, and to receive developer
reimbursements for City expenditures on same; and
WHEREAS, the City has, by Resolution_______ adopted by City Council on the _______
day of ______________, 2025, approved the reimbursement agreement for the construction of the
A Street Sports Complex Project by the City to a certain tract of land and established a preliminary
assessment reimbursement area and preliminary pro rata share of costs;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
1. The City constructed, at their expense, the A Street Sports Complex Project as per
construction plans signed and approved by the Public Works Director, or his/her designee.
The A Street Sports Complex Project will:
Page 201 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
The installation of 660-linear feet of 8-inch Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)
sewer main within the S. Elm Avenue right-of-way. The installation began
at the north side of the intersection of S. Elm Avenue and E. A Street and
headed south 660 feet just past the southern property boundary of Parcel
112-162-024
The facilities subject to this Agreement are included within the City's comprehensive utility
plan for the properties in Exhibit (B), and no additional comprehensive plan approval for
the utility system improvements was required. The facility was constructed in accordance
with the City Standard Specifications and Drawings in effect governing the construction
and specifications for facilities of such type, and subject to the approval of the Public
Works Director, or his/her designee. The City has determined a final “Assessment Area”
showing the benefiting parcels to be served by the facility, which is determined at the sole
discretion of the City, and which are identified and legally described in Exhibit (C)
2. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreements associated with utility system
improvements shall be valid for a period not to exceed twenty (20) years from the effective
date of the agreement.
While a developer agreement is valid, any person, firm or corporation now or hereafter
owning benefitted properties described below, or segregated parcels thereof, desiring to
connect to the described facilities, shall first pay their pro-rata share of the total cost of the
facilities (“Total Assessment”). For this project, the Total Assessment is shown in Exhibit
(A). The individual Assessment associated with each parcel of benefited property described
in this Agreement shall be charged to the property owner as shown in Exhibit (A).
3. With the completion of construction of the facility and its acceptance by the Public Works
Director, or his/her designee, and Council’s adoption of this Developer Reimbursement
Agreement, the City shall record latecomer assessments against all benefiting properties in
the assessment reimbursement area (“Latecomer Fees”), and the facility will become a part
of the municipal system of the City. Maintenance and operation costs of the said facilities
will be borne by the City, except for work and corrections covered by the contractor’s one-
year warranty bond.
4. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that with the completion of
construction and Council adoption of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement, no
person, firm or corporation owning property within the assessment reimbursement area
shall be granted a permit or be authorized by City to connect to or use the referenced
facilities during the period of time prescribed in Paragraph 2 above without first paying to
City, in addition to any and all other costs, assessments and charges made and assessed for
such tap or use, the amount required by the provisions of this contract. All amounts so
received by the City shall be used to reimburse the REET Fund for the capital improvement.
After the expiration of the time prescribed in Paragraph 2 of the agreement, City standard
fees in effect at the time, will apply.
Page 202 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
5. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that following passage of the
Developer Reimbursement Agreement by City Council, whenever any connection is made
onto the facility described in Paragraph 1 under the contract without such payment having
first been made in accordance with Exhibit (A), the City may remove or cause to be
removed, such unauthorized connection and all connected lines or pipe located in the
facility right-of-way, and dispose of such material removed without any liability
whatsoever.
6. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that following passage of this
Developer Reimbursement Agreement by City Council, and upon recording said
Developer Reimbursement Agreement with the appropriate county auditor's office within
thirty (30) days of its final execution, the terms of said Agreement shall run with the land
contained within the assessment reimbursement area and bind subsequent owners of the
properties affected
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and
year first above written.
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager
ATTEST:
Debra C. Barham, City Clerk
Page 203 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC - City Attorney
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
: ss
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN )
On this day personally appeared before me DAVE ZABELL, Interim City Manager of the
City of Pasco, Washington, described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ___ day of ______________, 2025.
________________________________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Print Name: _____________________________
Residing at _______________________________
My Commission Expires: ___________________
Page 204 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
8"
S
e
w
e
r
P
a
r
c
e
l
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
[
F
T
]
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
Co
s
t
[
%
]
=
[(
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
ua
l
Pa
r
c
e
l
Fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
[F
T
]
)
/
(
T
o
ta
l
Pa
r
c
e
l
Fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
[
F
T
]
)
]
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
s
t
[
$
]
=
(
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
s
t
[%
]
)
*
(
T
o
t
a
l
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
)
11
2
-
4
6
2
-
0
2
4
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
45
8
.
0
0
$
52
.
6
%
18
,
4
2
5
.
2
9
$
11
2
-
4
8
0
-
0
1
7
SN
A
K
E
R
I
V
E
R
A
G
R
I
C
U
L
T
U
R
E
L
L
C
30
0
.
0
0
$
34
.
5
%
12
,
0
6
8
.
9
7
$
11
2
-
4
6
2
-
0
6
9
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
11
2
.
0
0
$
12
.
9
%
4,
5
0
5
.
7
5
$
TO
T
A
L
S
:
87
0
.
0
0
10
0
.
0
0
%
35
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
35
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
Pa
r
c
e
l
#
,
O
w
n
e
r
LA
T
E
C
O
M
E
R
A
M
O
U
N
T
:
To
t
a
l
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
C
o
s
t
o
f
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
$3
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
Be
n
e
f
i
t
A
r
e
a
To
t
a
l
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
87
0
A
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
P
O
R
T
S
S
E
W
E
R
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
EXHIBIT A
AG
R
M
T
2
0
2
3
-
0
4
0
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Page 205 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
EXHIBIT B
Page 206 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
EXHIBIT C
BENEFITTING PARCELS
112-462-024
ALL BLOCKS 1 & 2, ELLIOTT'S ADDITION TOGETHER WITH ALL BLOCKS 1, 2, 3 & 4 WILLETTAS ADDITION
INCLUDING ALL VACATED STREETS AND ALLEYS
112-480-017
BINDING SITE PLAN 2023-02 LOT 3
112-462-069
WILLETTA'S ADD BLOCKS 7 & 8
Page 207 of 228
Resolution – A Street Sports Complex – Water DRA - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF DOMESTIC WATER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR
“A” STREET SPORTS COMPLEX PROJECT.
WHEREAS, RCW 35.91 and Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter 14.25 establishes a
statutory framework that allows developers to enter into Developer Reimbursement Agreements
when they fund necessary infrastructure improvements as a condition of development; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.91.020 and PMC 14.25.070 further provides that municipalities
may exercise the same reimbursement rights as private developers when they construct such
improvements at their own expense; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has submitted a complete and accurate application for a
Developer Reimbursement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, PMC Section 14.25.030(4) requires the Public Works Director, within 28
days of receipt of a Developer Reimbursement Agreement application to provide notice to the
developer whether the application is complete or needs to be supplemented or amended within 30
days of such notice unless extended within the Public Works Director discretion; and
WHEREAS, notice of complete application was provided to the applicant on February 21,
2024; and
WHEREAS, the City shall provide notice of its preliminary assessment reimbursement
area (those to repay the developer debt) to provide the property owners within the preliminary
assessment area the opportunity to request the matter be submitted to a public hearing, within 20
days of date of mailing of the notice, before Council action; and
WHEREAS, the City mailed notices of the preliminary assessment and reimbursement to
the property owners within the preliminary reimbursement area on March 6, 2024 and did not
receive in writing a request for a hearing before council; and
WHEREAS, utility system improvements include infrastructure projects related to City
water, irrigation, sewer and storm sewer which are required to be constructed as a prerequisite of
continued development; and.
WHEREAS, utility system Developer Reimbursement Agreements requested by
developers shall be entered into by the City of Pasco pursuant to PMC Section 14.25.030(3) once
the prerequisite of Chapter 14.25 of the PMC have been met; and
Page 208 of 228
Resolution – A Street Sports Complex – Water DRA - 2
WHEREAS, utility Developer Reimbursement Agreements shall meet the development
criteria as detailed in PMC Section 14.25.030(3)(b) of the PMC; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco agrees to payment of project costs, including legal and
administrative costs, as set forth in the Developer Reimbursement Agreement, attached as Exhibit
A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the Interim City Manager is authorized to execute the Developer Reimbursement
Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the Interim City Manager be authorized to make minor
substantive changes to the Agreement as needed.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 209 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF:
City of Pasco, Washington
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Pasco, Washington
525 North 3rd Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
AGREEMENT# AGRMT2023-039 w
Additional Parcels and Full Legal Descriptions attached hereto as Exhibit (C)
CITY OF PASCO
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
RCW 35.91 – A STREET SPORTS COMPLEX
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of___________, 2025,
by and between the City of Pasco, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as “City”, and the property owners listed on Exhibit (A) hereinafter called “Owner”;
and
WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 35.91 gives cities the authority to finance the construction of
Utility infrastructure, to assess benefited properties for pro rata share of construction costs, and to
collect reimbursements from property owners who connect to the system within twenty (20) years;
and
WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 35.91 and PMC 14.25.070 authorize the City to partner with
interested parties in financing development of Utility facilities, and to receive developer
reimbursements for City expenditures on same; and
WHEREAS, the City has, by Resolution_______ adopted by City Council on the _______
day of ______________, 2025, approved the reimbursement agreement for the construction of the
A Street Sports Complex Project by the City to a certain tract of land and established a preliminary
assessment reimbursement area and preliminary pro rata share of costs;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
1. The City constructed, at their expense, the A Street Sports Complex Project as per
construction plans signed and approved by the Public Works Director, or his/her designee.
The A Street Sports Complex Project will:
Page 210 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
The installation of 462-linear feet of 12-inch ductile iron water main within
the S. Elm Avenue right-of-way. The installation began at the intersection
of S. Elm Avenue and E. A Street and headed south 462-feet just past the
southern property boundary of Parcel 112-162-024. The benefitting parcels
are only being assessed the value of an 8-inch main and fittings.
The facilities subject to this Agreement are included within the City's comprehensive utility
plan for the properties in Exhibit (B), and no additional comprehensive plan approval for
the utility system improvements was required. The facility was constructed in accordance
with the City Standard Specifications and Drawings in effect governing the construction
and specifications for facilities of such type, and subject to the approval of the Public
Works Director, or his/her designee. The City has determined a final “Assessment Area”
showing the benefiting parcels to be served by the facility, which is determined at the sole
discretion of the City, and which are identified and legally described in Exhibit (C)
2. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreements associated with utility system
improvements shall be valid for a period not to exceed twenty (20) years from the effective
date of the agreement.
While a developer agreement is valid, any person, firm or corporation now or hereafter
owning benefitted properties described below, or segregated parcels thereof, desiring to
connect to the described facilities, shall first pay their pro-rata share of the total cost of the
facilities (“Total Assessment”). For this project, the Total Assessment is shown in Exhibit
(A). The individual Assessment associated with each parcel of benefited property described
in this Agreement shall be charged to the property owner as shown in Exhibit (A).
3. With the completion of construction of the facility and its acceptance by the Public Works
Director, or his/her designee, and Council’s adoption of this Developer Reimbursement
Agreement, the City shall record latecomer assessments against all benefiting properties in
the assessment reimbursement area (“Latecomer Fees”), and the facility will become a part
of the municipal system of the City. Maintenance and operation costs of the said facilities
will be borne by the City, except for work and corrections covered by the contractor’s one-
year warranty bond.
4. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that with the completion of
construction and Council adoption of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement, no
person, firm or corporation owning property within the assessment reimbursement area
shall be granted a permit or be authorized by City to connect to or use the referenced
facilities during the period of time prescribed in Paragraph 2 above without first paying to
City, in addition to any and all other costs, assessments and charges made and assessed for
such tap or use, the amount required by the provisions of this contract. All amounts so
received by the City shall be used to reimburse the REET Fund for the capital improvement.
After the expiration of the time prescribed in Paragraph 2 of the agreement, City standard
fees in effect at the time, will apply.
Page 211 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
5. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that following passage of the
Developer Reimbursement Agreement by City Council, whenever any connection is made
onto the facility described in Paragraph 1 under the contract without such payment having
first been made in accordance with Exhibit (A), the City may remove or cause to be
removed, such unauthorized connection and all connected lines or pipe located in the
facility right-of-way, and dispose of such material removed without any liability
whatsoever.
6. It is the intent of this Developer Reimbursement Agreement that following passage of this
Developer Reimbursement Agreement by City Council, and upon recording said
Developer Reimbursement Agreement with the appropriate county auditor's office within
thirty (30) days of its final execution, the terms of said Agreement shall run with the land
contained within the assessment reimbursement area and bind subsequent owners of the
properties affected
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and
year first above written.
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
Dave Zabell – Interim City Manager
ATTEST:
Debra C. Barham, MMC - City Clerk
Page 212 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC - City Attorney
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
: ss
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN )
On this day personally appeared before me DAVE ZABELL, Interim City Manager of the
City of Pasco, Washington, described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ___ day of ______________, 2025.
________________________________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Print Name: _____________________________
Residing at _______________________________
My Commission Expires: ___________________
Page 213 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
8"
W
a
t
e
r
P
a
r
c
e
l
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
[
F
T
]
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
s
t
[%
]
=
[
(
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
Pa
r
c
e
l
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
[F
T
]
)
/
(
T
o
t
a
l
P
a
r
c
e
l
Fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
[
F
T
]
)
]
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
s
t
[
$
]
=
(
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
s
t
[%
]
)
*
(
T
o
t
a
l
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
)
11
2
-
4
6
2
-
0
2
4
C
I
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
45
8
.
0
0
39
.
0
%
23
,
4
0
2
.
1
7
$
11
2
-
4
8
0
-
0
1
7
SN
A
K
E
R
I
V
E
R
A
G
R
I
C
U
L
T
U
R
E
L
L
C
30
0
.
0
0
25
.
5
%
15
,
3
2
8
.
9
3
$
11
2
-
4
6
2
-
0
6
9
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
S
C
O
13
8
.
7
5
11
.
8
%
7,
0
8
9
.
6
3
$
11
2
-
4
8
0
-
0
1
4
GR
O
W
B
O
U
N
T
I
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
L
L
C
27
7
.
5
0
23
.
6
%
14
,
1
7
9
.
2
6
$
TO
T
A
L
S
:
11
7
4
.
2
5
10
0
.
0
0
%
60
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
60
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
A
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
P
O
R
T
S
W
A
T
E
R
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
EXHIBIT A
AG
R
M
T
2
0
2
3
-
0
3
9
w
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
To
t
a
l
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
11
7
4
.
2
5
To
t
a
l
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
C
o
s
t
o
f
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
$6
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
LA
T
E
C
O
M
E
R
A
M
O
U
N
T
:
Be
n
e
f
i
t
A
r
e
a
Pa
r
c
e
l
#
,
O
w
n
e
r
Page 214 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
EXHIBIT B
Page 215 of 228
A Street Sports Complex
Developer Services Agreement
EXHIBIT C
BENEFITTING PARCELS
112-462-024
ALL BLOCKS 1 & 2, ELLIOTT'S ADDITION TOGETHER WITH ALL BLOCKS 1, 2, 3 & 4 WILLETTAS ADDITION
INCLUDING ALL VACATED STREETS AND ALLEYS
112-480-017
BINDING SITE PLAN 2023-02 LOT 3
112-480-014
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH,
RANGE 30 EAST, W.M., FRANKLIN COUNTY. WASHINGTON. EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THAT PART
THEREOF LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF A LINE DISTANCE 200 FEET NORTHEASTERLY FROM AND
PARALLELING THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF THE RAILROAD OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC
RAILWAY COMPANY AS ESTABLISHED ON MAY2, 1947, OVER AND ACROSS SAID PREMISES. MD ALSO
EXCEPT THE NORTH 340.00 FEET THEREOF.
112-462-069
WILLETTA'S ADD BLOCKS 7 & 8
Page 216 of 228
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 3, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 6/9/25
FROM: Griselda Garcia, Interim Director
Finance
SUBJECT: General Fund Monthly Report - April 2025 (2 minute staff report)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
April General Fund Summary and Detailed Report
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presentation
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Attached is the monthly General Fund financial update through April 2025, the
City's major governmental fund. Due to the reporting and receipt of revenues
such as sales taxes, where the State distributes in this case the local share of
January 2025 tax receipts in March, and the City's own accounting of
expenditures during the latter part of the reporting period, the General Fund
report reflects information as much as couple of months behind actuals. April
tax sales tax receipts are for January 2025 consumer activity. Nonetheless,
taken over time the monthly report provides the reader a reasonably solid view
of City finances and the ability to identify trends. The quarterly report provides
a higher level actuals with respect to actuals, and the Annual Report exact
numbers with respect to revenues and expenditures.
V. DISCUSSION:
As of the end of April, elapsed time for budget is 17%. This is a linear metric
that does not always align with City's non-labor costs and revenue. For
example, on the revenue side property taxes are distributed to the City in April
Page 217 of 228
and October, on the expenditure side, the City's liability insurance premium is
paid in one installment in January, supplies and services are charged as they
are received. Overall, revenues typically follow cyclical patterns, while many
expenditures—such as salaries—remain consistent throughout the year. This
report presents financial data as of a specific point in time and should not be
interpreted as a forecast for year-end results. At this time, Staff does not
expect any significant variance from the adopted budget for General Fund.
A list of contracts over $100,000 and under $300,000 executed administratively
in the month of April, as well as donations made to the City during the same
period are included in the report.
Page 218 of 228
Expenses as of end of April
Monthly General Fund Report
April 2025
Financial Highlights
The intent of this report is to provide an overview of activity in the City's
General Fund through April 30, 2025. This is a snapshot in time, projections
and analysis for decision making will prove valuable further in the year as
data is collected.
Where it came from:
Where it went:
Page 219 of 228
Budget to Actuals (Elapsed Time: 17%)
Operational
Category
2025-2026
Adopted Budget
2025 Actuals
2025
Encumbrance
%
Actuals
to Budget
Expense 169,209,410 22,772,985 3,509,302 13%
Operational Capital 646,643 318,300 78,275 49%
Debt Interest 7,082,921 - - 0%
Debt Principal 3,896,450 - - 0%
Personnel Benefits 23,181,518 3,315,950 - 14%
Salaries and Wages 67,851,635 8,917,507 - 13%
Overtime 3,407,711 368,939 - 11%
Services 50,100,511 8,705,691 3,238,064 17%
Supplies 7,267,021 433,097 192,963 6%
Transfers Out-Subsidy 2,875,000 289,464 - 10%
Transfers Out-UT Taxes to Streets 2,900,000 424,037 - 15%
Revenue 158,674,724 22,131,756 - 14%
Charges for Goods and Services 21,194,237 2,373,371 - 11%
Fine and Penalties 2,440,300 487,156 - 20%
Intergovernmental 7,519,082 1,260,358 - 17%
Licenses & Permits 6,584,940 872,080 - 13%
Miscellaneous 4,495,862 474,276 - 11%
Investment Income 1,128,804 382,026 34%
Taxes 114,384,039 16,058,039 - 14%
Transfer In - Subsidy 295,000 91,504 31%
Transfer In-Grants 632,460 132,947 21%
Net Impact (10,534,686) (641,229)
Capital / Non-Operational
Category
2025-2026 Adopted
Budget
2025 Actuals
2025 Encumbrance
% Actuals
to Budget
Expense 2,662,000 1,086,580 - 41%
Transfer Out - CIP 2,662,000 1,086,580 - 41%
Revenue - 760,722 - 0%
Sale of assets - 760,722 - 0%
Net Impact (2,662,000) (325,858)
Revenues
As of the end of April—approximately 17% into the biennium—General Fund
revenues totaled 14% of the budget, which is reasonable given the cyclical
nature of revenue collections. Operating expenditures exceeded revenues
during the reporting period, resulting in a net loss of $641,229. While this
Page 220 of 228
reflects a deficit, it is a marked improvement from the $1.9 million loss
reported at the end of March.
Key revenue sources, such as gambling and admission taxes, are received
quarterly and can temporarily affect cash flow. Additionally, property tax
payments occur biannually in April and October. The reduced shortfall is
largely attributed to the April receipt of property taxes and the catch-up of
interdepartmental service charges.
In response to inflation-driven increases in service contract costs, the City has
taken proactive steps to manage liquidity and optimize investment timing. As
a result, the General Fund earned $382,026 in interest income during the
reporting period—34% of the biennial budget for this revenue category.
Tax Type 2025 YTD 2024 YTD
Sales Tax 8,779,929 8,592,258
Property Tax 2,872,785 2,516,928
Utility Tax 4,041,602 3,654,472
Gambling, Admission, Leasehold 363,723 364,272
Total Taxes 16,058,039 15,127,929
The table above reflects tax revenue received thru end of April for 2025 and
2024 for comparison purposes.
During the first quarter, taxes made up 70% of total revenue received. As
seen in the table, sales tax makes up the majority of that revenue. The sales
tax rate is 8.9%. The City receives a share of regular sales tax, criminal
justice and public safety which are distributed by the State and Franklin
County.
Growth in the commercial base of the City is providing residents the
opportunity to spend their income within the community. Further, the
Destination Sales Tax State rule coupled with increase in online retail has
contributed to steady growth in sales tax revenue. Further, factors such as a
mild winter impact revenues such as Utility Taxes.
The bulk of revenues from property tax are received in two installments as
the deadlines for timely payment are April 30th and October 31st of each
Page 221 of 228
year. While the City received a small amount of payments for property taxes
thus far, all were for 2024 tax levy or prior.
Permits
Permit Type
YTD 2025
Count
YTD 2025
Value
YTD 2024
Count
YTD 2024
Value
Commercial 131 46,655,851 165 92,897,210
Industrial 21 12,948,075 21 93,886,487
Residential (Incl. mobile
homes) 540 37,491,939 687 53,046,740
Total 692 97,095,865 873 239,830,438
A variety of economic factors influence the overall health of the community
and, by extension, the vitality of the General Fund. One key indicator is
permitting activity, which reflects both the growth and desirability of the
community, as well as contributes to building-related sales tax revenue.
Permitting activity has begun the year at a slower pace, which may be
attributed to broader external influences. The City has historically
benefited from at least one large scale construction project such as a school
or large industrial or commercial project, this has not been the case this
year. Additionally, seasonal factors such as weather conditions can also
affect the timing and volume of permit issuance.
Staff will continue to monitor permitting trends closely and provide
updates as conditions evolve to ensure timely awareness of potential
impacts on revenue forecasts.
Donations
The recreation department actively pursues donations or sponsorships for
community events. Within the month of April, the department was
successful in receiving $20,688 in donations, totaling $64,183 of donations
Page 222 of 228
received within first quarter. The following table summarizes the donations
received this month.
Purpose Donor Amount
YOUTH
SCHOLARSHIPS
DC VENDING 938
CINCO DE MAYO MCCURLEY MAZDA 2,500
CINCO DE MAYO LES SCHWAB 5,000
CINCO DE MAYO THE PASCO ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
2,500
CINCO DE MAYO UFCW3000 1,000
RECREATION-MISC. FLYNN BEC, LP 1,000
FREE FAMILY SWIM
SPONSORSHIP
SECURE COURT SOLUTIONS 250
CINCO DE MAYO THE PASCO ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
7,500
Total Donations 20,688
Expenditures
As of the end of April, 17% of the total Services budget has been expended,
aligning with the 17% of time elapsed in the biennium. Major costs to date
include the library contract and Police Department services such as vehicle
leases, the body-worn camera contract, and dispatch services.
Overtime costs across all General Fund departments totaled $368,939 for
the reporting period. Of this, 99% was incurred by the Police and Fire
divisions under the Public Safety function, reflecting the essential and often
unpredictable nature of 24/7 emergency operations. While overtime
expenditures have declined compared to previous years—a positive trend—
they remain a significant cost. Increases are expected in the coming months
due to seasonal demands and scheduled absences. Continued monitoring
and evaluation will be key to managing this expenditure effectively.
3-Year Trend Overtime
Jan-Apr. 2023 Jan-Apr. 2024 Jan-Apr. 2025
740,411 661,136 368,939
Page 223 of 228
Contracts between $100,000 and $300,000
During April, staff entered into the following contracts.
Purpose Contractor/Vendor Amount
Energy Resilience and Electrical Study
ScottMadden, Inc
140,000
Page 224 of 228
70%
3%
4%10%
General Fund Report
April 2025
A monthly snapshot of Pasco’s General Fund through April 30, 2025
2025
F I N A N I C A L S U M M A R Y A T A G L A N C E
Net Position: -$641,229 (improvement from -$1.9M in March)
Revenue Sources: 70% from taxes
Services Budget Used: 17% (aligned with time elapsed; major costs include library,
police vehicle leases, body-worn camera contracts, and dispatch services)
Overtime Budget Used: 11% (99% from Police and Fire under Public
Safety; trending down vs. prior years)
Encumbered Funds: $1,305,654 (reserved for future expenses)
W H E R E R E V E N U E C A M E F R O M
Parks & Rec Sponsorships Received
(April)$20,688
Taxes
Transfer &
Investment Interest
Licenses &
Permits
Charges for
Goods & Services
2%
3%
Fines &
Penalties
Capital Asset
Sale
In April, taxes made up 70% of total General Fund
revenue, with the majority generated from an 8.9%
sales tax. The City receives allocations from regular
sales tax, criminal justice, and public safety funds,
distributed by the State and Franklin County.
Continued growth in the City’s commercial sector
supports local spending, while the Destination Sales
Tax rule and increased online retail activity have
contributed to stable sales tax growth. The first major
installment of property tax payments was due April
30th, reducing the prior revenue shortfall and
improving cash flow. Other key revenue sources, such
as gambling and admission taxes, are received
quarterly and can affect timing of collections.
Tax Type 2025 YTD 2024 YTD
Sales $8,779,929 $8,592,258
Property $2,872,785 $2,516,928
Utility $4,041,602 $3,654,472
Gambling, Admission,
Leasehold $363,723 $364,272
8%
Misc. &
IntergovernmentalPage 225 of 228
3%5%31%
A variety of economic factors influence the overall health of the
community and, by extension, the vitality of the General Fund.
One key indicator is permitting activity, which reflects both the
growth and desirability of the community, as well as contributes
to building-related sales tax revenue.
Permitting activity has begun the year at a slower pace, which
may be attributed to broader external influences. Additionally,
seasonal factors such as weather conditions can also affect the
timing and volume of permit issuance.
We are concerned about ability to meet budgeted revenue targets
in this area and will continue to monitor permitting trends
closely and provide updates as conditions evolve to ensure
timely awareness of potential impacts on revenue forecasts.
5%6%
Residential
74.4%
Commercial
22.7%
Industrial
2.9%
Permit Type
YTD
2025
Count
YTD 2025
Value
YTD
2024
Count
YTD 2024
Value
Commercial 131 $46,655,851 165 $92,897,210
Industrial 21 $12,948,075 21 $93,886,487
Residential
(incl. mobile
homes)
540 $37,491,939 687 $53,046,740
OVERVIEW
Transportation Transfers Public Safety
CONTRACTS
PERMIT TRENDS Contracts Executed
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Bottom line improved from prior month by approximately $1.3M.
Some expenditures are paid early in the year (e.g., insurance)
This report reflects a point-in-time snapshot—not final outcomes
These insights guide decision-making throughout the biennium
Energy Resilience and Electrical Study
Vendor: ScottMadden, Inc
Amount: $140,000
Natural &
Economic
Cultural &
Community
During the reporting period, operating expenditures exceeded operating revenues, resulting in a net loss of $641,229. It is important to recognize that revenue and
expenditure timing does not always align, especially early in the biennium. Several key revenue sources—such as gambling and admission taxes—are received
quarterly, which can temporarily impact the General Fund’s cash flow. Additionally, property taxes are received in two large installments, with the first due at the end
of April. This April property tax collection as well as healthy sales tax revenue helped reduce the prior month’s deficit of $1.9 million. Further, proactive cash flow
monitoring and investing resulted in $382,026 year-to-date in investment income.
By the end of April, approximately 17% of the biennium had elapsed. Total General Fund revenues reached 14% of budget, which is reasonable given cyclical
revenue patterns. Charges for Services revenue was at 11% of budget, showing improvement compared to March. This category includes interdepartmental
engineering services, which are billed in April for the first quarter and monthly thereafter. Since this activity represents 33% of the budgeted Charges for Services,
the earlier lag in revenue recognition is expected to stabilize in the second quarter.
While many revenues fluctuate with the calendar, expenditures—such as salaries and contracts—remain relatively steady. Overtime costs totaled $368,939, with
99% incurred by the Police and Fire divisions under the Public Safety function. This reflects the essential and often unpredictable nature of emergency services,
where 24/7 operations require consistent staffing. Although overtime has decreased compared to the same period in previous years, it remains a significant cost.
With seasonal factors and planned absences ahead, overtime spending is expected to rise. Ongoing monitoring and evaluation will be necessary to manage this
expenditure effectively and maintain progress.
PERMITS
51%
General
Government
Page 226 of 228
Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and
appropriate investment and re- investment in community
infrastructure.
City Council Goals
QUALITY OF LIFE
2024-2025
Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services
and programs.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system.
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Implement targeted strategies to reduce crime through strategic
investments in infrastructure, staffing, and equipment.
COMMUNITY SAFETY
Promote and encourage economic vitality.
ECONOMIC VITALITY
Identify opportunities to enhance City of Pasco identity, cohesion,
and image.
CITY IDENTITY
Page 227 of 228
METAS DEL CONCEJO MUNICIPAL
2024-2025
Promover una alta calidad de vida a través de programas, servicios
y inversion apropiada y reinversión en la comunidad infraestructura
comunitaria.
CALIDAD DE VIDA
Promover viabilidad financiera a largo plazo, valor, y niveles de
calidad de los servicios y programas.
SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA
Promover un sistema de transporte multimodal altamente funcional.
RED DE TRANSPORTE DE LA COMUNIDAD
Implementar estrategias específicas para reducir la delincuencia por
medios de inversiones estratégicas en infraestructura, personal y equipo.
SEGURIDAD DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD
Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica.
VITALIDAD ECONOMICA
Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la
cohesión, y la imagen.
IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA
Page 228 of 228