HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025.05.27 Council Workshop Packet
AGENDA
City Council Workshop Meeting
7:10 PM - Tuesday, May 27, 2025
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar
Page
1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would
like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out
the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment)
to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings
must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this workshop.
The Pasco City Council Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel
191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at
www.facebook.com/cityofPasco.
To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-332-249-0718 and use access
code 832 515 271#.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for
assistance.
Servicio de intéprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la
Secretaria Municipal dos dias antes para garantizar la disponiblidad.
(Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request.
Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure
availability.)
2. CALL TO ORDER
3. ROLL CALL
4. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
5. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC
COMMENT – the public may comment on each topic scheduled for
discussion, up to 2 minutes per person with a total of 8 minutes per item. If
opposing sides wish to speak, then both sides receive an equal amount of
time to speak or up to 4 minutes each side.
Page 1 of 153
3 - 103 (a) Resolution - Tri-Cities HOME Consortium's 2025-2029
Assessment of Fair Housing Plan (5 minutes staff presentation)
104 - 121 (b) Presentation - Potential Changes to Inspection Services (5
minutes staff presentation)
122 - 140 (c) Presentation - Introduction to Amending PMC 3.65 Utility Billing
Management (10 minutes staff presentation)
141 - 151 (d) General Fund Monthly Report - March 2025 (2 minutes staff
report)
6. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION
(a) Discussion with legal Counsel About current or Potential
Litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) (15 minutes)
8. ADJOURNMENT
9. CLOSED SESSION
(a) Discuss Collective Bargaining Unit Negotiations per RCW
42.30.140(4)(a) (10 minutes)
10. ADDITIONAL NOTES
152 - 153 (a) Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only)
(b) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the
City Clerk for assistance.
Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por
favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para
garantizar la disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter
service may be provided upon request. Please provide two
business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.)
Page 2 of 153
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council May 21, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 5/27/25
FROM: Haylie Miller, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Resolution - Tri-Cities HOME Consortium's 2025-2029 Assessment of
Fair Housing Plan (5 minutes staff presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Proposed Resolution
Draft Tri-Cities Assessment of Fair Housing 2025-2029
Power Point Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
a conducts Consortium”) (“the HOME Tri-Cities The Consortium
comprehensive fair housing planning process every five years to assess
barriers to equitable housing access. This process is designed to identify the
unique challenges faced by individuals who encounter disproportionate
housing obstacles due to specific characteristics protected under state and
federal fair housing laws.
Protected classes under these laws include race, color, religion, sex, national
origin, familial status, disability, veteran status, marital status, and age. While
most people belong to one or more protected classes, certain subgroups—
such as racial and ethnic minorities, seniors, individuals with disabilities, or
families with children—often face heightened difficulties in accessing housing
that is safe, affordable, and appropriate to their needs.
As part of this planning effort, the Consortium conducted an in-depth analysis
Page 3 of 153
of U.S. Census data, local and state policies, and community input. The
resulting document, known as the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH),
summarizes the findings and outlines trends, community needs, fair housing
laws, access to opportunity, and reported instances of housing discrimination.
The AFH identifies key impediments to fair housing within the Tri-Cities and
provides actionable strategies the Consortium will implement to address and
mitigate these barriers.
V. DISCUSSION:
Through this effort the Tri-Cities Consortium identified five impediments to fair
housing:
There exists a low supply of affordable housing.
Most affordable housing options that do exist lack accessibility features
for people with physical disabilities and seniors.
Community members have limited knowledge of their fair housing rights
and landlord responsibilities.
Non-English speakers face barriers to obtaining services and
information in their native language.
Certain populations require additional services to ensure they can
effectively use transportation systems to access important services and
destinations.
The Tri-Cities Consortium identified various actions it will take over the next
five years to overcome the identified impediments to fair housing:
Increasing Affordable Housing Supply
The HOME Consortium will continue to partner with housing authorities
to explore building more affordable housing.
The HOME Consortium will utilize various outreach techniques, such as
newspaper, mail, and social media, to promote the Down Payment
Assistance Program.
Increasing Accessible Housing Supply
Richland and Pasco will utilize various outreach techniques, such as
newspaper, owner-cities’ promote to the social and mail, media,
occupied rehabilitation program. Kennewick will investigate creating a
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)-funded owner-occupied
rehabilitation program.
Investment The HOME Consortium will investigate utilizing HOME
Partnerships Program (HOME) funds to rehabilitate existing homes to
make them more accessible to people with disabilities.
The HOME Consortium will explore utilizing local forums to increase
Page 4 of 153
knowledge of accessible building standards and community accessibility
needs among housing developers.
The HOME Consortium will promote the development of ADUs by
advocating for policies and programs that support the housing type.
Promoting Knowledge of Fair Housing
The HOME Consortium will organize and host a fair housing training for
organizations working with residents.
The HOME Consortium will explore hosting a fair housing training for
landlords.
Kennewick with working explore the Consortium HOME The will
Housing Authority (KHA) and the Housing Authority of the City of Pasco
and Franklin County (HACPFC) to create a fair housing educational
program for residents.
Increasing Language Access
The HOME Consortium will continue to work on translating key
documents, such as program applications, into other languages.
The HOME Consortium will continue to utilize the Language Line to
communicate with non-English-speaking residents.
The HOME Consortium will work with non-profit agencies to understand
the barriers and services needed for non-English-speaking residents.
Increasing Transportation Connectivity
The HOME Consortium will work with community partners, including the
transit authority, to implement the goals outlined in their respective Bike-
Pedestrian Plans.
Each city will continue to coordinate with Ben Franklin Transit regarding
the organization’s free bus passes for students program.
Each city will continue to evaluate crosswalks that need updating to
meet visual and auditory accessibility standards.
To ensure transparency, promote community engagement, and comply with
program requirement, the draft plan was publicly advertised on April 30, 2025,
for a 30-day comment period, which will conclude on June 2, 2025. A public
hearing was also advertised and was held before the Planning Commission on
May 15, 2025, to gather additional input. No public comments were received.
Staff will provide a briefing on the plan highlights, take input and respond to
questions Council may have regarding the plan with the intent for Council
adoption of the 2025-2029 Tri-Cities Assessment of Fair Housing Plan at the
next regular meeting.
Page 5 of 153
Resolution – 2025-2029 Tri-Cities Fair Housing - 1
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE TRI-CITIES HOME
CONSORTIUM’S 2025-2029 TRI-CITIES ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING.
WHEREAS, the Tri-Cities HOME Consortium member cities Pasco, Kennewick, and
Richland (“Consortium”) contracted with The Cloudburst Group (“Consultant”) to prepare the
Consolidated Plan for the program years 2025 through 2029, which includes the Assessment of
Fair Housing; and
WHEREAS, the Consortium advertised and participated in workshops and public
meetings to assess the community needs for fair housing; and
WHEREAS, the City staff, Planning Commission, and City Council reviewed a briefing
regarding input and results of this effort, and no comments from the public were received.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the Pasco City Council adopts the Tri-Cities HOME Consortium’s “Tri-Cities
Assessment of Fair Housing 2025-2029,” a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2025.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 6 of 153
Page 7 of 153
Page 8 of 153
Page 9 of 153
Page 10 of 153
Page 11 of 153
Page 12 of 153
Page 13 of 153
Page 14 of 153
Page 15 of 153
Page 16 of 153
Page 17 of 153
Page 18 of 153
Page 19 of 153
Page 20 of 153
Page 21 of 153
Page 22 of 153
Page 23 of 153
Page 24 of 153
Page 25 of 153
Page 26 of 153
Page 27 of 153
Page 28 of 153
Page 29 of 153
Page 30 of 153
Page 31 of 153
Page 32 of 153
Page 33 of 153
Page 34 of 153
Page 35 of 153
Page 36 of 153
Page 37 of 153
Page 38 of 153
Page 39 of 153
Page 40 of 153
Page 41 of 153
Page 42 of 153
Page 43 of 153
Page 44 of 153
Page 45 of 153
Page 46 of 153
Page 47 of 153
Page 48 of 153
Page 49 of 153
Page 50 of 153
Page 51 of 153
Page 52 of 153
Page 53 of 153
Page 54 of 153
Page 55 of 153
Page 56 of 153
Page 57 of 153
Page 58 of 153
Page 59 of 153
Page 60 of 153
Page 61 of 153
Page 62 of 153
Page 63 of 153
Page 64 of 153
Page 65 of 153
Page 66 of 153
Page 67 of 153
Page 68 of 153
Page 69 of 153
Page 70 of 153
Page 71 of 153
Page 72 of 153
Page 73 of 153
Page 74 of 153
Page 75 of 153
Page 76 of 153
Page 77 of 153
Page 78 of 153
Page 79 of 153
Page 80 of 153
Page 81 of 153
Page 82 of 153
Page 83 of 153
Page 84 of 153
Page 85 of 153
Page 86 of 153
Page 87 of 153
Page 88 of 153
Page 89 of 153
Page 90 of 153
Page 91 of 153
Page 92 of 153
Page 93 of 153
Page 94 of 153
Page 95 of 153
May 27, 2025
Pasco City Council
Workshop
Pa
g
e
9
6
o
f
1
5
3
2025-2029 Tri-Cities
HOME Consortium
Assessment of Fair Housing
May 27, 2025
City Council
Pa
g
e
9
7
o
f
1
5
3
BACKGROUND
3
•The Tri -Cities HOME Consortium conducts a comprehensive fair
housing planning process every five years to assess barriers to
equitable housing access within the region. This accompanies the
consolidated plan.
•This process is designed to identify unique challenges faced by
individuals who encounter disproportionate housing obstacles due to
specific characteristics protected under federal and state fair housing
laws.
Pa
g
e
9
8
o
f
1
5
3
Identified Impediments to Fair Housing
4
•Limited supply of affordable housing
•Insufficient accessible housing for seniors and individuals with
disabilities
•Low public awareness of fair housing rights and landlord obligations
•Language barriers for non-English speakers
•Transportation gaps impacting access to essential services
Pa
g
e
9
9
o
f
1
5
3
5
Proposed Actions 2025-2029
Increase Affordable Housing Supply
•Continue partnerships with housing authorities and other affordable housing
entities such as Habitat for Humanity to expand affordable housing.
•Promote the Down Payment Assistance Program through multilingual
outreach channels.
Expand Accessible Housing
•Support owner-occupied rehabilitation programs in all cities.
•Investigate the use of HOME funds to retrofit homes for accessibility.
•Promote accessible building standards among developers.
•Advocate for ADU-friendly policies and development.
Pa
g
e
1
0
0
o
f
1
5
3
Proposed Actions 2025-2029- Continuation
6
Promote Fair Housing Awareness
•Host fair housing trainings for nonprofits and landlords.
•Collaborate with local housing authorities on resident education programs.
Improve Language Access
•Translate program documents and utilize interpreter services.
•Partner with nonprofits to assess language access needs and resources.
Enhance Transportation Connectivity
•Coordinate with Ben Franklin Transit to support student pass programs.
•Prioritize connectivity through Transportation System Master Plan & City Standards
•Advance bike and pedestrian infrastructure projects.
•Upgrade crosswalks to meet accessibility standards.
Pa
g
e
1
0
1
o
f
1
5
3
7
PLAN ADOPTION NEXT STEPS
•City Council Review & Adoption – Presentation at the City Council
Workshop on May 27, with formal approval scheduled for June 2.
•Submission to HUD – The plan will be submitted to HUD for approval, as
the initial FY25 allocation notice has been received.
•Implementation & Oversight – Upon HUD approval, the plan will guide
the proposed actions for the next five fiscal years (2025-2029).
Pa
g
e
1
0
2
o
f
1
5
3
QuestionsPa
g
e
1
0
3
o
f
1
5
3
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council May 21, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 5/27/25
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Presentation - Potential Changes to Inspection Services (5 minutes staff
presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
Presentation
Educational Flyers
2021 International Building Code - 105.2 Work exempt from permit
2021 International Residential Building Code - 105.2 Work exempt from permit
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
and State Washington in jurisdictions The like Pasco, of City most all
jurisdictions in the United States has adopted and regulates building activities
through the International Building Code (IBC). While a regulatory agency may
not lessen the standards of the IBC, a regulatory agency may increase such
standards. The City, dating back to the 1980's, has updated Pasco Municipal
Code 16.05.050 multiple times through Ordinances Nos. 2153, 2881, 3133,
3149, 3670, 4108, & 4515, which effectively supplement the IBC and its
predecessor code the Uniform Building Code (UBC). These updates revised
certain administrative provisions in Chapter 1 of the International Building Code
(IBC) and/or the International Residential Code (IRC) that exempt certain types
of work from requiring permits. As a result, the City has required permits and
inspections for work that would typically be exempt under the IBC.
At the January 13, 2025, Council Workshop, City staff presented a list of permit
Page 104 of 153
and inspection requirements that could potentially be eliminated. This review
was conducted as part of an effort to enhance efficiency and streamline the
permitting process and ease the burden of regulations on the public. The
discussion was brought forward in conjunction with a request to approve a
professional services agreement with Northwest Code Professionals.
At the March 3, 2025, Council Workshop, Council expressed the desire to
amend portions of permit and inspection requirements provided for under the
PMC for certain types of work of which are typically exempted under the
adopted also Council others. IRC and the including Codes State IBC,
supported staff recommendations that residential re-roofing and siding
permit even exemption, for projects potential as replacement candidates
though these are not included in the IBC’s or IRC's list of exempted work.
Council directed staff to evaluate an option to provide a voluntary site review
and permit to assist residents on their projects and to help prevent errors due
to constructing or installing structures like sheds or fences over easements,
utility lines, within setbacks, critical areas, or in nonconformance with other
Pasco Municipal Codes (PMC).
Council has shown strong interest in this topic, recognizing its potential to
reduce regulatory requirements on residents and businesses while maintaining
essential safety and quality standards.
V. DISCUSSION:
an permit; site optional provide to the explore did staff City opportunity
however, it is recommended that City Staff focus instead focus its efforts on
educating and informing residents. Education materials are attached as Exhibit
B, easy posts, media social periodic and is staff addition in proposing
accessibility of information on the City's website to reach residents. It is felt that
this approach will be more effective and of greater value to the public than a
voluntary review and site/plan permit. In addition to the educational materials,
City staff will assist residents in understanding the City requirements for
construction of these structures and make them make them aware of other
areas to consider such as local utility easements.
Listed below are the items to be revised:
1. One-story detached accessory structures (e.g., sheds, playhouses) up
to 200 s.f. residential, 120 s.f. for commercial & industrial
2. Private and sidewalks driveways ≤30 grade, above in. not over
basements, not part of an accessible route and not within the public
rights of way
3. Retaining Walls less than 4 feet in height
4. Fencing less than 7 feet in height.
5. Water tanks less than 5,000 gallons
6. Window Awnings projecting less than 54"
Page 105 of 153
7. Decks less than 200 s.f. & less than 30" above grade
8. Prefabricated swimming pools less than 24" deep
9. Residential roofing and underlayment replacement (roofing,
underlayment, flashing only)
10. Residential siding and barrier replacement (siding, veneer, barrier,
flashing only)
Conclusion
Staff is seeking Council’s direction as to the removal of permit and inspection
requirements provided for under the PMC for certain types of work of which are
typically exempted under Section 105.2 of the IBC, as well as, residential re-
roofing and siding replacement even though these are not included in the IBC’s
or IRC's list of exempted work and for staff to provide more robust and up to
date information to ensure residents have appropriate level of knowledge and
understanding before embarking upon such improvements.
Page 106 of 153
May 27th, 2025
Pasco City Council
Workshop
Pa
g
e
1
0
7
o
f
1
5
3
Potential Changes to
Inspection Services
May 27th, 2025
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
1
0
8
o
f
1
5
3
•One -story detached accessory
structures (e.g., sheds, playhouses) up to
200 s.f.residential, 120 s.f.for commercial
&industrial
•Sidewalks and driveways ≤30 in.
above grade, not over basements, not part
of an accessible route and not within the
public rights of way
•Retaining Walls less than 4 feet in height
•Water tanks less than 5,000 gallons
•Window Awnings projecting less than 54"
•Decks less than 200 s.f.& less
than 30"above grade
•Prefabricated swimming pools less than
24"deep
Permit Exemptions in the adopted IBC & IRC but deleted by the
City of Pasco
3
Pa
g
e
1
0
9
o
f
1
5
3
•One -story detached accessory structures
(e.g., sheds, playhouses) up to 200 s.f.
residential, 120 s.f.for commercial &
industrial
•Sidewalks and driveways ≤30 in. above
grade, not over basements, not part of an
accessible route and not within the public
rights of way
•Retaining Walls less than 4 feet in height
•Water tanks less than 5,000 gallons
•Window Awnings projecting less than 54"
•Decks less than 200 s.f.& less than
30"above grade
•Prefabricated swimming pools less than 24"
deep
•Residential roofing and underlayment
replacement (roofing, underlayment,
flashing only)
•Residential siding and barrier replacement
(siding, veneer, barrier, flashing only)
Potential Permit & Inspection Eliminations
4
Pa
g
e
1
1
0
o
f
1
5
3
Benefits
•Reduced
regulatory
burden and cost
for homeowners
•City resources
can be utilized
for high er
mission
Impacts
5
Challenges
•Encroachment Issues
•Potential Safety Risks
•Reduced Code
Compliance/Increased
Code Enforcement
demand
Pa
g
e
1
1
1
o
f
1
5
3
•Remove the requirements for
inspection as recommended
•Focus on information and
education
Staff Recommendation
6
Pa
g
e
1
1
2
o
f
1
5
3
Pa
g
e
1
1
3
o
f
1
5
3
Inspection Types:
•Structural Inspections:
•Footing and Setbacks
•Stem Wall, Foundation, and Rebar
•Retaining Wall and CMU/Masonry
•Slab, Thickened Footing, Roof Sheathing
•Plumbing and Mechanical:
•Underground Plumbing, Water, Sewer
•Gas Piping, Rough Plumbing, Hydro
Flush/Pressure Test
•Mechanical and HVAC, Venting & Exhaust
Systems
•Framing and Interior
•Shear Framing, General Framing
•Insulation, sheetrock, ceiling Grid
•Fire and Safety
•Firewall/Occupancy Separation & Egress
Systems
•Fire Line,Fire Sprinkler Systems
•Fire & Smoke Detection & Alarm Systems
•Specialty Inspections
•Basement Weatherproofing
•Marriage Connections (FAS) and Tie-Downs
(FAS)
•Title Elimination (FAS)
•Final Inspections
•Residential and Commercial Final Inspections
•Final with Temporary Certificate of Occupancy
(TCO)
• Commercial Final Fire Inspection
Inspections
8
Pa
g
e
1
1
4
o
f
1
5
3
16.05.050 Deletion of IBC(s) subsections.
Subsections 105.2, “Building,” (1), (2), (3), (4),
(5), (9) and (10) of the International Building
Code(s) shall be deleted. [Ord. 4515 §2, 2021;
Ord. 4108, 2013; Ord. 3670 §2, 2004; Ord.
3149 §2, 1996; Ord. 3133 §4, 1996; Ord.
2881 §3, 1992; Ord. 2153 §2, 1980; Code
1970 §16.04.025.]
Deletion of IBC(s) Subsections
9
What Does this mean?
•Section 105.2 of the International Building
Code (IBC) outlines types of work that are
exempt from permitting. However, since the
Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) specifically
deletes these exemptions, the City is
required to enforce permits and inspections
for these work types.
Pa
g
e
1
1
5
o
f
1
5
3
SHED RULES
N O P E R M I T N E E D E D I F :
D O N ’T B U I L D O V E R E A S E M E N T S !S H E D S T Y L E R U L E S
Y O U D O N E E D A P E R M I T I F :
NEED HELP OR HAVE QUESTIONS?
You do NOT need a permit to build a
shed if:
It’s only one story
It’s detached (not attached to your
home)
It’s used for tools, storage, or play
It’s 120 square feet or smaller
(about a 10x12 shed)
Easements are parts of your property
that may be used for:
Utility access
Drainage
Maintenance by the city or utility
companies
You cannot build sheds, fences,
concrete pads/patios, or other
permanent structures over
easements.
How to find an easement on your lot:
Check your property survey or
plat map (usually given when you
bought the property) and contact
your utility companies.
Or contact Pasco’s Community
and Economic Development
Department for help
Building over an easement could
lead to fines or removal of your
structure if access is needed.
Check with the City of Pasco before you start
building to make sure your project meets all rules.
We’re here to help!
To keep neighborhoods looking good,
your shed must:
Use roofing and siding that
matches or complements your
house
Be smaller and shorter than your
house if it’s a detached garage
Be built away from other structures
and property lines to meet required
Fire Separation
No minimum shed size — smaller
sheds are allowed!
You DO Need a Permit If...
The shed is larger than 120 sq. ft.
You’re building a garage or
workshop
The shed is placed before a home
exists on the lot
Your detached accessory
structure is greater than one story
EMAIL@pasco-wa.gov www.pasco-wa.gov
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE YOU BUILD
Page 116 of 153
FENCE, WALL & HEDGE GUIDELINES
G E N E R A L R U L E S
S I D E , R E A R & C O R N E R Y A R D S
P R O H I B I T E D F E N C E M A T E R I A L S
R E S I D E N T I A L F R O N T Y A R D S
NEED HELP OR HAVE QUESTIONS?
Fence and wall heights are measured
from the ground or curb, depending on
location.
Materials must complement any
buildings on the property (especially in
commercial areas).
Fences must meet city safety and
visibility standards.
Max height: 6 feet
Must include at least one 3-foot-wide
gate to access the side yard.
Check with the City of Pasco before you start
building to make sure your project meets all rules.
We’re here to help!
Not allowed: tires, pallets, tarps,
plastic sheets, bed springs, and wire
fencing (like chicken wire) in
residential and commercial zones.
Only use approved construction
materials.
Some wire fencing is allowed in rural
areas over 1 acre with farm animals.
Max height: 3.5 feet
You may add up to 1.5 feet of see-
through material (like lattice or metal
mesh) for a total of 5 feet.
If over 3.5 feet tall:
Must display your address number
on the fence.
Locked gates must have a Knox
Box for emergency access.
Information, location and locking of
residential Knox Boxes can be
obtained by contacting the Building
Division.
EMAIL@pasco-wa.gov
www.pasco-wa.gov
CITY OF PASCO- DESIGN STANDARDS
B A R B E D & E L E C T R I C F E N C I N G
Barbed and razor wire: Not allowed
in most areas; some exceptions in
rural or business zones.
Electric fences: Only allowed in rural
zones or behind another fence.
V I S I B I L T Y A T C O R N E R S
In street corners or near alleys,
fences and plants must be:
Under 3 feet tall, OR
See-through (75% transparent)
and no more than 6 feet tall if
designed properly.
S P E C I A L D I S T R I C T S (I -1 8 2 O V E R L A Y )
Fences along I-182 must be masonry
block.
Existing Surewood fences must be
replaced with masonry or pre-
approved cedar materials.
L A N D S A P I N G R U L E S
(C O M M E R C I A L /I N D U S T R I A L )
Fences must go behind landscaping
along the street.
Page 117 of 153
Page 118 of 153
Page 119 of 153
International Residential Code
R105.2 Work exempt from permit.
Exemption from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for
any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws or
ordinances of this jurisdiction. Permits shall not be required for the following:
• Building:
1. 1.Other than storm shelters, one-story detached accessory structures, provided
that the floor area does not exceed 200 square feet (18.58 m2).
2. 2.Fences not over 7 feet (2134 mm) high.
3. 3.Retaining walls that are not over 4 feet (1219 mm) in height measured from the
bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge.
4. 4.Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000
gallons (18 927 L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2 to
1.
5. 5.Sidewalks and driveways.
6. 6.Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, counter tops and similar finish
work.
7. 7.Prefabricated swimming pools that are less than 24 inches (610 mm) deep.
8. 8.Swings and other playground equipment.
9. 9.Window awnings supported by an exterior wall that do not project more than 54
inches (1372 mm) from the exterior wall and do not require additional support.
10. 10.Decks not exceeding 200 square feet (18.58 m2) in area, that are not more than
30 inches (762 mm) above grade at any point, are not attached to a dwelling and do
not serve the exit door required by Section R311.4.
• Electrical:
1. 1.Listed cord-and-plug connected temporary decorative lighting.
2. 2.Reinstallation of attachment plug receptacles but not the outlets therefor.
3. 3.Replacement of branch circuit overcurrent devices of the required capacity in the
same location.
4. 4.Electrical wiring, devices, appliances, apparatus or equipment operating at less
than 25 volts and not capable of supplying more than 50 watts of energy.
5. 5.Minor repair work, including the replacement of lamps or the connection
of approved portable electrical equipment to approved permanently installed
receptacles.
Page 120 of 153
• Gas:
1. 1.Portable heating, cooking or clothes drying appliances.
2. 2.Replacement of any minor part that does not alter approval of equipment or make
such equipment unsafe.
3. 3.Portable-fuel-cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and
are not interconnected to a power grid.
• Mechanical:
1. 1.Portable heating appliances.
2. 2.Portable ventilation appliances.
3. 3.Portable cooling units.
4. 4.Steam, hot- or chilled-water piping within any heating or
cooling equipment regulated by this code.
5. 5.Replacement of any minor part that does not alter approval of equipment or make
such equipment unsafe.
6. 6.Portable evaporative coolers.
7. 7.Self-contained refrigeration systems containing 10 pounds (4.54 kg) or less of
refrigerant or that are actuated by motors of 1 horsepower (746 W) or less.
8. 8.Portable-fuel-cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and
are not interconnected to a power grid.
• Plumbing:
1. 1.The stopping of leaks in drains, water, soil, waste or vent pipe; provided, however,
that if any concealed trap, drainpipe, water, soil, waste or vent pipe becomes
defective and it becomes necessary to remove and replace the same with new
material, such work shall be considered as new work and a permit shall be obtained
and inspection made as provided in this code.
2. 2.The clearing of stoppages or the repairing of leaks in pipes, valves or fixtures, and
the removal and reinstallation of water closets, provided such repairs do not involve
or require the replacement or rearrangement of valves, pipes or fixtures.
R105.2.1 Emergency repairs.
Where equipment replacements and repairs must be performed in an emergency situation,
the permit application shall be submitted within the next working business day to the building
official.
Page 121 of 153
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council May 20, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 5/27/25
FROM: Griselda Garcia, Interim Director
Finance
SUBJECT: Presentation - Introduction to Amending PMC 3.65 Utility Billing
Management (10 minutes staff presentation)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
PowerPoint
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Historically, utility account deposits were required on all new utility accounts,
owner and tenant. In February 2013, City Council adopted an ordinance
shifting utility account responsibility away from property owners and putting the
burden solely on the tenant. This change removed the requirement for a
deposit from the property owner, required tenant accounts to carry deposits,
and directed the City to pursue collections directly from tenants for past due
amounts. In doing so, Council's intent was to use deposits as a financial
safeguard to cover delinquencies and final bills. At that time, it was shared that
the burden of managing a deposit program outweighed benefits and risk of a
potential loss due to unpaid utility bills.
Over the past decade plus now, the experience has been such that even
though tenant accounts make up approximately 11% of total utility accounts,
the current deposit program consumes a significant amount of staff time and is
the cause for many manual processes. In fact, the duties associated with
deposits and tenant accounts equates to one FTE with an approximate annual
cost of $96K. Further, at times deposits are not sufficient to cover outstanding
balances, especially when accounts close in summer months when balances
Page 122 of 153
are typically higher. As of March 2025, tenant account balances that have been
written off or are currently in the process of being written off amount to
$56,226. This financial burden is ultimately borne by the remaining ratepayers.
Strengthening accountability with property owners would enhance revenue
streams, reduce administrative workload, and mitigate the City's financial risk.
system and legal realities, updates, decade, past the Over operational
limitations have revealed that this structure is not effective. The City's Utility
Billing system lacks the ability to bill deposits in a streamlined, accountable
way — resulting in significant staff time spent on workarounds, manual entries,
and have repeated administrative effort. These inefficiencies become
increasingly burdensome while offering limited financial protection for the City.
In addition to challenges related to deposits, other sections of the Pasco
Municipal Code have become outdated or misaligned with current technology,
customer expectations, and operational practices. These include:
Code language that conflicts with the system’s technical capabilities
Fee structures that no longer reflect actual service delivery costs
Wording that is inconsistent, unclear, or not customer-friendly
Lack of reference to online forms, digital communications, and modern
customer tools
Limited flexibility in billing and payment plan options
Inequities in how after-hours service fees are applied
Together, these issues limit the City’s ability to operate this aspect of Utility
Billing strategic on progress also hinder equitably. and efficiently They
improvements that require staff time to implement currently as they are tied up
in outdated administrative billing collection processes.
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends updating the Pasco Municipal Code to:
Reassign utility account responsibility to property owners
Eliminate the deposit requirement for tenant accounts
Align Utility Billing code language with system capabilities
Remove outdated waivers and simplify fee structures
Modernize language to reflect current customer service methods,
including online forms and electronic notifications
These changes reflect the model already used when properties are sold in
Pasco, where owners remain responsible for outstanding balances. It also
establishes the City's role as utility provider, rather than property owners or
tenant management.
Page 123 of 153
Benefits of this change include:
Improved accuracy in accounting and reporting
Reduced workload for staff
Reduced ratepayer subsidy for uncollected amounts - bad debt write off
Increased ability to collect delinquent balances
Mitigate risks associated with State law enacted April 2023
More consistent and equitable treatment across all property types,
owner occupied and rentals
Capacity to refocus staff on high-value process improvement efforts,
including:
- Reconfiguring meter read routes to increase efficiency and stabilize
workload
- Transition to new handheld technology
- Payment processor upgrades
- Customer-Friendly billing enhancements
Potential challenges include:
Initial resistance from property owners due to reestablishing a historic
responsibility.
government limiting in Council’s interest with aligns transition This the
overreach while ensuring reliable, efficient service. It brings the City back into
compliance unlocks with intended State and municipal code language,
progress on long-delayed operational improvements, and lessens the burden
on ratepayers due to bad debt.
Page 124 of 153
May 27th, 2025
Pasco City Council
Workshop
Pa
g
e
1
2
5
o
f
1
5
3
Utility Billing Reform:
Aligning Code,
Process & Purpose
May 27, 2025
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
1
2
6
o
f
1
5
3
Background
Proposed changes
Unlocking Time for High-Impact
Improvements
01
02
03
Pa
g
e
1
2
7
o
f
1
5
3
Background
4
Pa
g
e
1
2
8
o
f
1
5
3
Municipal Code
•In February 2013, Council adopted an ordinance that:
o Shifted utility account responsibility away from property
owners
o Required deposits only on tenant accounts, removed
deposit requirement for new owner accounts.
o Directed the City to pursue collections directly from
tenants
•The intent was to use deposits to cover delinquencies or apply
them to final bills during tenant move -out. However:
o The typical deposit many times does not cover
outstanding bill when account closes in the summer
months.
o Managing these deposits adds significant staff time and
inefficiencies.The effort needed to manage the program
is greater than the intended benefits.
o Deposits are only collected from tenant accounts, which
represent just 11% of all utility accounts
Background – Utility Deposits
5
Process
• Current Process = High Volume + Heavy Workload
o Hundreds of deposits manually processed each year
o Each deposit triggers multiple accounting steps and
staff touchpoints
o Move -ins and move -outs double the work for every
account
o Lease reviews, journal entries, and paper checks eat
up time and resources
o Billing software conversion occurred fall of 2023, which
doesn't accommodate current practices. Process takes
about 4x longer.
o Staff from Utility Billing, Accounting, and Administration
are involved at every step
o Manual processes lead to printing, filing, and cross -
department meetings
Pa
g
e
1
2
9
o
f
1
5
3
Challenges
System Limitations - Our billing system isn’t built for
deposit billing. Workarounds require multiple journal
entries per account and intensive manual handling —
increasing risk of error and staff workload.
Acting as a middleman for Property Management- the
City is taking on responsibilities that resemble those of a
property manager; such as mediating landlord-tenant
billing issues. This goes far beyond the City’s intended
role – and burdens staff with tasks that don’t support
utility service delivery.
Delayed Collections = Lost Revenue -
Staff bandwidth limits our ability to pursue collections in a
timely manner. Return on collections are minimal.
Background – Utility Deposits
6
State law passed April 2023 prohibits disconnection of
water service during heat-related events. Experience has
shown high bills are incurred and tenants move during
summer resulting in limited recourse and balances
exceed deposits.
Limited Accountability in Rental Turnover – Tenants can
move out with unpaid bills and landlords have no
incentive to ensure payment.
Unreported ADU Tenants – Accessory Dwelling Units
(ADUs) with unreported tenants complicate billing and
enforcement.
Pa
g
e
1
3
0
o
f
1
5
3
Clean up
•Code language conflicts with
what our Utility Billing system
can support
•Processes are weighed down
by outdated and unnecessary
requirements
•Current code lacks a clear
customer-focused approach
Background- Other Utility Billing PMC
7
Pa
g
e
1
3
1
o
f
1
5
3
Proposed Changes
8
Pa
g
e
1
3
2
o
f
1
5
3
Responsibility
Shift utility account responsibility back to
the property owner and eliminate the need
for tenant deposits. Property owners would
be responsible for monitoring their account
status and coordinating directly with the
City for updates — similar to the process
already in place when a property is sold in
Pasco.
Proposed Changes – Utility Deposits
9
Suggested Code Language
“The property owner shall be responsible for all unpaid utility
charges associated with their property, regardless of whether
services were provided to the owner, a tenant, or any other
occupant. This responsibility applies irrespective of any rental or
lease agreements. All outstanding utility charges for services
rendered to the property shall be billed to the property owner. In
cases where the property is occupied by someone other than
the owner, the owner remains fully liable for any unpaid utility
bills.”
Pa
g
e
1
3
3
o
f
1
5
3
Comparisons
Proposed Changes - Utility Deposits
10
City Accepts Deposits Account Responsibility
Kennewick Yes Property Owner
Richland Yes Tenant
Walla Walla No Property Owner
West Richland No Property Owner
Federal Way No Property Owner
Spokane Yes Either – requires a responsible agent to be assigned
Moses Lake No Either – requires a responsible agent to be assigned
Pa
g
e
1
3
4
o
f
1
5
3
Financial Impact – Utility Deposits
11
•All activity related to deposits equate to 1 FTE.
•Only 11% of accounts are essentially costing
$96K, value of 1 FTE.
•Calls and emails related to deposits can be
substantial at times, especially during the
summer months. Removing this requirement will
reduce the number of inquiries regarding
deposits, which will in turn reduce response time
and increase availability to answer other inquiries.
•Costs associated with generating refund checks
and postage would be eliminated. Often time
checks are for minimal amounts of less than
$100.
•Tenant accounts are records-intensive which
results in additional staff time for review and
additional retention costs for physical and
electronic records which must be kept for 7 years
after account closure.
•As of March 2025, tenant account balances that
have been written off or are in the process of
being written off total $56,226. This financial
burden is ultimately absorbed by the remaining
ratepayers.
Pa
g
e
1
3
5
o
f
1
5
3
Clean up
•Improve Access and Flexibility for Customers
o Allow customers with delinquent balances to
participate in the Budget Payment Program
o Expand and clarify payment plan options to
better meet individual needs
•Modernize Language and Communication
Standards
o Update code language to be more customer-
friendly and accessible
o Add references to online forms and digital
notification options to reflect how customers
interact today
Proposed Changes - Other Utility Billing PMC
12
Pa
g
e
1
3
6
o
f
1
5
3
Clean up
•Adjust Timing and Operational Logic
o Align account name change timing
with operational realities (e.g., from 3
days to 30 days – if needed)
o Clarify billing and due date language
to avoid confusion
o Adjust how duplicate bills are handled
(only during delinquency under current
system)
•Update Fee Structures
o Reevaluate fees for after-hours field
service to ensure fairness and
transparency
o Eliminate exceptions that waive the
“Application Fee – Service to New
Connection” to reduce unnecessary
complexity and administrative tracking
burden
Proposed Changes - Other Utility Billing PMC
13
Pa
g
e
1
3
7
o
f
1
5
3
Unlocking Time for
High-Impact
Improvements
14
Pa
g
e
1
3
8
o
f
1
5
3
By reducing manual workload tied to deposits and outdated processes, staff will gain the time and
capacity needed to move forward on key improvements that have been delayed — including:
•Optimizing meter reading routes
•Fully implementing new handheld devices
•Transitioning to a modern payment processor
•Exploring credit card processing fee options
•Expanding online forms and customer self-service tools
•Evaluating fixed billing dates or bi -monthly billing options for greater consistency and efficiency
•Exploring technology to improve phone call response times
This isn’t just a code update – it’s an opportunity to unlock stalled progress, improve the customer
experience, and modernize Utility Billing for the future.
Unlocking Time for High-Impact Improvements
15
Pa
g
e
1
3
9
o
f
1
5
3
Questions?Pa
g
e
1
4
0
o
f
1
5
3
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council May 20, 2025
TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 5/27/25
FROM: Griselda Garcia, Interim Director
Finance
SUBJECT: General Fund Monthly Report - March 2025 (2 minutes staff report)
I. ATTACHMENT(S):
March General Fund Report
March Report at a Glance
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
N/A
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Attached is the monthly General Fund financial update through March 2025,
the City's major governmental fund. Quarterly reports to Council for other
funds. Due to the reporting and receipt of revenues such as sales taxes, where
the State distributes in this case the local share of January 2025 tax receipts in
March, and the City's own accounting of expenditures during the latter part of
the reporting period, the General Fund report reflects information as much as
couple of months behind actuals. Nonetheless, taken over time the monthly
report provides the reader a reasonably solid view of City finances and the
ability to identify trends. The quarterly report provides a higher level actuals
with respect to actuals, and the Annual Report exact numbers with respect to
revenues and expenditures.
V. DISCUSSION:
As of the end of March, elapsed time for budget is 13%. This is a linear metric
that does not always align with City's non-labor costs and revenue. For
Page 141 of 153
example, on the revenue side property taxes are distributed to the City in April
and October, on the expenditure side, the City's liability insurance premium is
paid in one installment in January, supplies and services are charged as they
are received. Overall, revenues typically follow cyclical patterns, while many
expenditures—such as salaries—remain consistent throughout the year. This
report presents financial data as of a specific point in time and should not be
interpreted as a forecast for year-end results. At this time, Staff does not
expect any significant variance from the adopted budget for General Fund.
A list of contracts over $100,000 and under $300,000 executed administratively
in the month of March, as well as donations made to the City during the same
period are included in the report.
Page 142 of 153
Monthly General Fund Report
March 2025
Financial Highlights
The intent of this report is to provide an overview of activity in the City's
General Fund through March 31, 2025. This is a snapshot in time,
projections and analysis for decision making will prove valuable further in
the year as data is collected.
Where it came from:
Where it went:
Page 143 of 153
Budget to Actuals (Elapsed Time: 13%)
General Fund
2025-2026
Budget
1st Qtr 2025
Actuals
2025
Encumbrance
% of
Budget
Revenue 158,674,724 15,023,180 - 9%
Charges for Goods and Services 21,194,237 1,488,598 - 7%
Fine and Penalties 2,440,300 372,835 - 15%
Intergovernmental 7,519,082 444,623 - 6%
Licenses & Permits 6,584,940 602,422 - 9%
Miscellaneous 4,799,666 242,515 - 5%
Investment Income 825,000 266,093 - 32%
Taxes 114,384,039 10,635,116 - 9%
Sale of asset - 757,669 - 0%
L&I & other insurance recovery - 47,199 - 0%
Transfer in - Subsidy 295,000 33,163 - 11%
Transfer in Grants 632,460 132,947 - 21%
Expense 171,871,410 16,942,550 1,305,654 10%
Operational Capital 576,850 163,705 88,354 28%
Debt Interest 7,082,921 - - 0%
Debt Principal 3,896,450 - - 0%
Personnel Benefits 23,181,518 2,397,379 - 10%
Salaries and Wages 67,851,635 6,508,902 - 10%
Overtime 3,407,711 237,702 - 7%
Services 50,097,711 6,533,693 1,004,538 13%
Supplies 7,339,614 163,781 212,762 2%
Transfer UT Taxes to Streets 2,900,000 375,004 - 0%
Transfer CIP Related (bond)2,662,000 431,666 - 16%
Transfer Animal Shelter 1/3 2,875,000 130,719 - 5%
Net Impact (13,196,686) (1,919,370)
Page 144 of 153
Revenues
During the reporting period, operating expenditures exceeded operating
revenues, resulting in a net loss of $1,919,370. It is important to note that the
timing of revenue receipts and expenditures does not always align. Several
key revenue sources—including gambling taxes and admission taxes—are
received on a quarterly basis which can temporarily impact the General
Fund's cash flow. Further, property taxes are received twice a year with
payments in April and October. End of March represents approximately 13%
of elapsed time in the biennium. At this time, charges for services revenue is
at about 7% of budget, lower than expectations. Some of the major activities
within this revenue category are interdepartmental charges for
administrative services and engineering services, both services make up 64%
of the charges for services category. Of that engineering services make up 33%
of the budget. Due to year-end closing processes, grant year-end closeout
processes and project carryover process occurring within the first quarter,
engineering services are billed in April for first quarter then monthly going
forward. This initial delay in billing explains the lower-than-expected revenue
recognition in first quarter, however this is expected to improve within
second quarter.
Proactive steps have been taken in response to the current economic
environment, particularly the challenges posed by inflation which has
impacted increases in service contracts. Through strategic timing of
investments and a focus on liquidity management, the department has been
able to generate increased interest income. Within first quarter the General
Fund earned $266,093 in investment interest income which represents 32%
of budgeted revenue for the biennium for this revenue category.
Tax Type 2025 YTD 2024 YTD
Sales Tax* 6,834,024 6,576,720
Property Tax* 445,976 417,811
Utility Tax 3,008,898 2,754,165
Gambling, Admission, Leasehold 346,219 351,532
*Payments received in Jan./Feb. for prior year activity
The table above reflects tax revenue received thru end of March for 2025
and 2024 for comparison purposes.
Page 145 of 153
During the first quarter, taxes made up 71% of total revenue received. As
seen in the table, sales tax makes up the majority of that revenue. The sales
tax rate is 8.9%. The City receives a share of regular sales tax, criminal
justice and public safety which are distributed by the State and Franklin
County.
Growth in the commercial base of the City is providing residents the
opportunity to spend their income within the community. Further, the
Destination Sales Tax State rule coupled with increase in online retail has
contributed to steady growth in sales tax revenue. Further, factors such as a
mild winter impact revenues such as Utility Taxes.
The bulk of revenues from property tax are received in two installments as
the deadlines for timely payment are April 30th and October 31st of each
year. While the City received a small amount of payments for property taxes
thus far, all were for 2024 tax levy or prior.
Permits
Permit Type
YTD 2025
Count YTD 2025 Value YTD 2024 Count YTD 2024 Value
Commercial 100 33,732,895 136 89,608,865
Industrial 13 558,687 13 93,441,145
Residential (Incl. mobile
homes) 363 26,859,760 446 34,955,156
Total 476 61,151,342 595 218,005,166
A variety of economic factors influence the overall health of the community
and, by extension, the vitality of the General Fund. One key indicator is
permitting activity, which reflects both the growth and desirability of the
community, as well as contributes to building-related sales tax revenue.
Permitting activity has begun the year at a slower pace, which may be
attributed to broader external influences, including the current political and
economic climate. The City has historically benefited from at least one large
scale construction project such as a school or large industrial or commercial
project, this has not been the case this year. Additionally, seasonal factors
such as weather conditions can also affect the timing and volume of permit
issuance.
Page 146 of 153
Staff will continue to monitor permitting trends closely and provide updates
as conditions evolve to ensure timely awareness of potential impacts on
revenue forecasts.
Donations
The recreation department actively pursues donations or sponsorships for
community events. Within the month of March, the department was
successful in receiving $16,400 in donations, totaling $40,111 of donations
received within first quarter. The following table summarizes the donations
received this month.
Purpose Donor Amount
Cinco de Mayo MP FAMILY SERVICES LLC 2,500
Cinco de Mayo FIESTA FOODS 2,500
Cinco de Mayo COLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE 2,500
Recreation – Misc. AMAZON 3,000
Cinco de Mayo AMAZON 5,000
Cinco de Mayo JIM LONDON 50
Cinco de Mayo PERFECTION GLASS 850
Total Donations 16,400
Page 147 of 153
Expenditures
Certain expenditures, particularly in the Services and Supplies categories,
do not occur evenly throughout the year. As of end of March 13% of the total
Services budget was expended which meets expectations given end of March
represents 13% of elapsed time in the biennium. Some of the largest services
expenses were related to the library contract and Police Department services
such as vehicle leases, body camera contract and dispatch contract.
Overtime expenditures across all City departments within General Fund
totaled $237,702 for the reporting period. Of this amount, 82% was
attributed to the Police and Fire divisions, which fall under the Public Safety
reporting function. This concentration reflects the essential and often
unpredictable nature of public safety operations, where overtime is
frequently necessary to maintain 24/7 emergency response coverage,
address staffing shortages, and support critical incidents. Overtime costs
have shown a downward trend compared to previous years. While this
reduction is a positive step, overtime remains a substantial budget item for
the City. Further, this is expected to significantly increase in the coming
months due to typical increases during summer months and anticipated
absences. Continued monitoring and process evaluation will be essential to
maintain this downward trajectory and manage costs effectively.
3-Year Trend Overtime
Jan-Mar. 2023 Jan-Mar. 2024 Jan-Mar. 2025
549,981 487,296 237,702
Contracts between $100,000 and $300,000
During March, staff entered into the following contracts.
Purpose Contractor/Vendor Amount
GESA Stadium Female Locker
Room Improvements
Banlin Construction $198,159
Comprehensive Plan Update Framework Not to exceed $299,768
Page 148 of 153
Page 149 of 153
71%
3%
4%10%
General Fund Report
March 2025
A monthly snapshot of Pasco’s General Fund through March 31, 2025
2025
F I N A N I C A L S U M M A R Y A T A G L A N C E
Net Position: -$1,919,370 (temporary due to timing of revenues)
Revenue Sources: 71% from taxes
Services Budget Used: 13% (large, one-time payments contracts)
Overtime Budget Used: 7% (mostly Public Safety)
Encumbered Funds: $1,305,654 (reserved for future expenses)
W H E R E R E V E N U E C A M E F R O M
Parks & Rec Sponsorships Received
(March)$16,400
Taxes
Transfer &
Investment Interest
Licenses &
Permits
Charges for
Goods & Services
2%
5%
Fines &
Penalties
Capital Asset
Sale
In March, taxes accounted for 71% of total
revenue, predominantly from an 8.9% sales tax.
The City benefits from shares of regular sales tax,
criminal justice, and public safety funds distributed
by the State and Franklin County. Growth in the
City's commercial base allows residents to spend
locally, while the Destination Sales Tax State rule
and increased online retail have led to steady
sales tax revenue growth. Property tax revenues
are primarily collected in two installments due by
April 30th and October 31st, with only a small
amount received thus far for the 2024 tax levy or
earlier.
Tax Type 2025 YTD 2024 YTD
Sales $6,834,024 $4,532,948
Property $445,976 $417,811
Utility $3,008,898 $2,754,165
Gambling, Admission,
Leasehold $346,219 $351,532
5%
Misc. &
IntergovernmentalPage 150 of 153
5%6%52%
A variety of economic factors influence the overall health of the
community and, by extension, the vitality of the General Fund.
One key indicator is permitting activity, which reflects both the
growth and desirability of the community, as well as contributes to
building-related sales tax revenue.
Permitting activity has begun the year at a slower pace, which may
be attributed to broader external influences, including the current
political and economic climate. Additionally, seasonal factors such
as weather conditions can also affect the timing and volume of
permit issuance.
Staff will continue to monitor permitting trends closely and provide
updates as conditions evolve to ensure timely awareness of
potential impacts on revenue forecasts.
6%10%
Residential
76.3%
Commercial
21%
Industrial
2.7%
Permit Type
YTD
2025
Count
YTD 2025
Value
YTD
2024
Count
YTD 2024
Value
Commercial 100 $33,732,895 136 $89,608,865
Industrial 13 $558,687 13 $93,441,145
Residential
(incl. mobile
homes)
363 $26,859,760 446 $34,955,156
O V E R V I E W
Transportation Transfers Public Safety
C O N T R A C T S P E R M I T T R E N D S
Contracts Executed
K E Y H I G H L I G H T S
Some revenues (like property & gambling tax) are received quarterly
Some expenditures are paid early in the year (e.g., insurance)
This report reflects a point-in-time snapshot—not final outcomes
These insights guide decision-making throughout the biennium
GESA Stadium Female Locker Room Improvement
Vendor: Banlin Construction
Amount: $198,159
Natural &
Economic
Cultural &
Community
During the reporting period, operating expenditures exceeded operating revenues, resulting in a net loss of $1,919,370. It is important to note that the timing of revenue
receipts and expenditures does not always align. Several key revenue sources—including gambling taxes and admission taxes—are received on a quarterly basis
which can temporarily impact the General Fund's cash flow. Further, property taxes are received twice a year with payments in April and October. End of March
represents approximately 13% of elapsed time in the biennium. At this time, charges for services revenue is at about 7% of budget, lower than expectations. One of the
activities included in Charges for Services category is interdepartmental engineering services which are billing in April for first quarter, then monthly going forward. This
activity accounts for 33% of budgeted revenue. This initial delay in billing explains the lower-than-expected revenue recognition in first quarter, however this is expected
to improve within second quarter.
Revenues typically follow cyclical patterns, while many expenditures—such as salaries—remain consistent throughout the year. Overtime expenditures across all City
departments within General Fund totaled $237,702 for the reporting period. Of this amount, 82% was attributed to the Police and Fire divisions, which fall under the
Public Safety reporting function. This concentration reflects the essential and often unpredictable nature of public safety operations, where overtime is frequently
necessary to maintain 24/7 emergency response coverage, address staffing shortages, and support critical incidents. Overtime costs have shown a downward trend
compared to previous years. While this reduction is a positive step, overtime remains a substantial budget item for the City. Further, this is expected to significantly
increase in the coming months due to typical increases during summer months and anticipated absences. Continued monitoring and process evaluation will be
essential to maintain this downward trajectory and manage costs effectively.
P E R M I T S
21%
General
Government
Comprehensive Plan Update
Vendor: Framework
Amount: Not to exceed $299,768
Page 151 of 153
Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and
appropriate investment and re- investment in community
infrastructure.
City Council Goals
QUALITY OF LIFE
2024-2025
Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services
and programs.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system.
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Implement targeted strategies to reduce crime through strategic
investments in infrastructure, staffing, and equipment.
COMMUNITY SAFETY
Promote and encourage economic vitality.
ECONOMIC VITALITY
Identify opportunities to enhance City of Pasco identity, cohesion,
and image.
CITY IDENTITY
Page 152 of 153
METAS DEL CONCEJO MUNICIPAL
2024-2025
Promover una alta calidad de vida a través de programas, servicios
y inversion apropiada y reinversión en la comunidad infraestructura
comunitaria.
CALIDAD DE VIDA
Promover viabilidad financiera a largo plazo, valor, y niveles de
calidad de los servicios y programas.
SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA
Promover un sistema de transporte multimodal altamente funcional.
RED DE TRANSPORTE DE LA COMUNIDAD
Implementar estrategias específicas para reducir la delincuencia por
medios de inversiones estratégicas en infraestructura, personal y equipo.
SEGURIDAD DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD
Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica.
VITALIDAD ECONOMICA
Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la
cohesión, y la imagen.
IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA
Page 153 of 153