The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2025.04.21 Council Meeting Packet AGENDA City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, April 21, 2025 Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar Page 1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment) to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this meeting. To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-332-249-0718 and use access code 955 851 583#. City Council meetings are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco. 2. CALL TO ORDER 3. ROLL CALL (a) Pledge of Allegiance 4. CONSENT AGENDA - All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Councilmembers, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered separately. 5 - 17 (a) Approval of Meeting Minutes for April 7th, 12th, and 14th To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting held on April 7th, Special Meeting held on April 12th, and Special Meeting & Regular Workshop held on April 14, 2025. 18 - 19 (b) Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of $4,224,212.84 Page 1 of 137 To approve claims in the total amount of $4,224,212.84 ($1,899,645.50 in Check Nos. 270770 - 271019; $917,462.15 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 849749, 849751 - 849753; $14,580.61 in Check Nos. 54913 - 54919; $1,391,464.66 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30223490 - 30224124; $1,059.92 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 347 - 349). 20 - 43 (c) Resolution No. 4591 - Second Amendment to RH2 Engineering, Inc. Professional Services Agreement for NW Irrigation System Upgrade To approve Resolution No. 4591, authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 for the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with RH2 Engineering, Inc. for Northwest Irrigation Systems Expansion Project. (RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS - The public may address Council on any items unless it relates to a scheduled Public Hearing. This item is provided to allow the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for debate or for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate response. Some questions require consideration by Council over time and after a deliberative process with input from a number of different sources; some questions are best directed to staff members who have access to specific information. Citizen comments will normally be limited to three minutes each by the Mayor. Those with lengthy messages are invited to summarize their comments and/or submit written information for consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings. Lastly, when called upon, please state your name and city or county residency into the microphone before providing your comments. 7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS (a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers 44 - 53 (b) General Fund Monthly Report - January 2025 (5 minute staff report) 8. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO 54 - 64 (a) Public Hearing - Request for Zoning Code Text Amendment (5 minute staff presentation) Staff Presentation Page 2 of 137 HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING 9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS 65 - 67 (a) *Resolution No. 4592 - Quote Rejection for City View Cemetery Estate Fence (5 minute staff presentation) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4592, rejecting all quotes for Quote No. 24-977 for City View Cemetery Estate Fence. 68 - 78 (b) *Resolution No. 4593 - Memorandum of Understanding for Tri- Cities Regional Public Facility District Administration (3 minute staff presentation) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4593, authorizing the Interim City Manager to sign the Memorandum of Understanding for Tri-Cities Regional Public Facilities District Administration. 79 - 104 (c) Resolution No. 4594 - United States Bureau of Reclamation Municipal and Industrial (M&I) Water Service Contract (5 minute staff presentation) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4594, authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute a Municipal and Industrial Water Supply Contract with the United States Bureau of Reclamation. 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 105 - 118 (a) 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program (15 minute staff presentation) 11. NEW BUSINESS 119 - 135 (a) Capital Improvement Plan Update (10 minute staff presentation) 12. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION (a) Discussion with Legal counsel About Current or Potential Litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) 14. ADJOURNMENT 15. ADDITIONAL NOTES (a) (RC) Roll Call Vote Required Page 3 of 137 * Item not previously discussed Q Quasi-Judicial Matter MF# “Master File #....” 136 - 137 (b) Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only) (c) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the City Clerk for assistance. Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.) Page 4 of 137 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 16, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 4/21/25 FROM: Debra Barham, City Clerk City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Meeting Minutes for April 7th, 12th, and 14th I. ATTACHMENT(S): 4.7.2025, 04.12.2025 and 4.14.2025 Draft Council Minutes II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting held on April 7th, Special Meeting held on April 12th, and Special Meeting & Regular Workshop held on April 14, 2025. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 5 of 137 MINUTES City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, April 7, 2025 Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar MEETING INSTRUCTIONS FOR REMOTE ACCESS CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Pete Serrano, Mayor. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Pete Serrano, David Milne, Melissa Blasdel, Charles Grimm, and Leo Perales Councilmembers attending remotely: Leo Perales Councilmembers absent: Blanche Barajas and Peter Harpster Staff present: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager; Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager; Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief; Scott Mihalik, Assistant City Attorney; Jesse Rice, Parks & Recreation Director; Ken Roske, Police Chief; Maria Serra, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Meeting Minutes for March 17th, March 22nd, March 24th, and March 31st To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting held on March 17th, Special Meeting held on March 22nd, Regular Workshop held on March 24th and Special Meeting held on March 31, 2025. Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of $6,863,149.92 Page 1 of 5Page 6 of 137 To approve claims in the total amount of $6,863,149.92 ($4,764,861.26 in Check Nos. 270325 - 270769; $888,226.55 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 849381 - 849423, 849457 - 849508, 849523 - 849616, 849619 - 849621, 849660 - 849666; $14,184.78 in Check Nos. 54906 - 54912; $1,195,877.33 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30222858 - 30223489). Resolution No. 4582 - Rivershore Sewer Interceptor Upsizing Phase 1 Design Loan Acceptance To approve Resolution No. 4582, approving and authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute a Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) Loan Contract No. WQC-2025-Pasco-00012 with the Washington State Department of Ecology for design of the Rivershore Sewer Interceptor Upsizing - Phase 1 project. Resolution No. 4583 - Professional Services Agreement with Consor North America, Inc. for Design Services for the Sylvester Street Overpass Pedestrian/ Bicycle Access Project To approve Resolution No. 4583, authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Consor North America, Inc. for the design of the Sylvester Street Overpass Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Project. Resolution No. 4584 - Project Acceptance for the Well Capacity Upgrades Project To approve Resolution No. 4584, accepting work performed by Carpenter Drilling, LLC under contract for the Irrigation Well Rehabilitation and Repair Project. Resolution No. 4585 - Agreement with Burnham for Tax Credit Proceeds Transfer To approve Resolution No. 4585, relating to the City's Wastewater Utility; authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute an agreement exercising option with Burnham SEV Pasco LLC (Project Company) and Burnham Pasco Holding LLC for Wastewater Treatment Agreement (WTA) Tax Credit Proceeds Transfer. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel to approve the Consent Agenda as read. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously by Roll Call vote. 5-0 AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember Grimm, and Councilmember Perales ABSENT: Councilmember Barajas and Councilmember Harpster PUBLIC COMMENTS Dennis Brown, Franklin County resident, commented on curb ramps and prior to Page 2 of 5Page 7 of 137 the meeting, he distributed a few copies of two photos of a curb ramp and a curb. He requested that curb ramps be included in the Pasco Municipal Code as an option. Mary Mahoney, Pasco resident, commented on the bald eagles, flood plains, the Pasco Public Facilities District Executive Director and the Aquatic Facility, Pasco Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and Animal Control topics. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS Verbal Reports from Councilmembers Ms. Blasdel reported on the Visit Tri-Cities Board meeting, the Tri-Cities Regional Chamber of Commerce Annual meeting and the Lucky Leaf grand opening. She also announced the most recent Pasco High School Dance Team wins. Mayor Serrano reported on the Lucky Leaf grand opening held last week and the Pasco Aviation celebration held earlier in the day. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO Public Hearing & Resolution No. 4586 - Surplus and Transfer of City-Owned Personal Property to a Government Agency Deputy Fire Chief Mortenson provided a brief report related to the surplus of a spill response vessel purchased with grant funds from the Washington State Department of Ecology. He explained that the property can only be transferred to another government agency and Chelan County Fire District No. 7 has a need for the vessel. Mayor Serrano declared the Public Hearing open to consider the proposed surplus and transfer of the boat. Following three calls for comments, and there being none, Mayor Serrano declared the Public Hearing closed. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel to approve Resolution No. 4586, declaring certain City-owned personal property as surplus, approving the method of disposal; and further, authorize the Interim City Manager to transfer the property to another government agency. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously. 5-0 AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember Grimm, and Councilmember Perales ABSENT: Councilmember Barajas and Councilmember Harpster Page 3 of 5Page 8 of 137 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS Resolution No. 4587 - Surplus and Sale through Consignment of City Personal Property Deputy Fire Chief Mortenson provided a brief report on the surplus and sale of an older fire ladder truck. Mr. Perales asked about the longevity of the Fire department equipment. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel to approve Resolution No. 4587, declaring City-owned personal property as surplus, approving the method of disposal; and further, authorize the Interim City Manager to sell the property through consignment. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously. 5-0 AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember Grimm, and Councilmember Perales ABSENT: Councilmember Barajas and Councilmember Harpster MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION Mr. Zabell announced that the third party contractor started cleaning the Pasco Downtown Area as of April 7th. He also noted that the City participated in containment spraying for the Japanese Beatle invasion last week. Mayor Serrano announced the Annual Spring Egg-Stravaganza scheduled for April 19th. EXECUTIVE SESSION Council adjourned into Executive Session at 7:37 PM for 8 minutes returning at 7:47 PM to discuss Discussion with legal counsel about current or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) with the Assistant City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, and outside legal counsel. At 7:43 PM, the City Manager, Deputy City Manager, and Police Chief joined the Executive Session. At 7:47 PM Mayor Serrano announced that the Executive Session would continue for another 5 minutes or until 7:52 PM. Mayor Serrano called the meeting back to order at 7:55 PM. Page 4 of 5Page 9 of 137 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:55 PM. PASSED and APPROVED on _______________________. APPROVED: ATTEST: Pete Serrano, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk Page 5 of 5Page 10 of 137 MINUTES City Council Special Meeting 8:30 AM - Saturday, April 12, 2025 Courtyard by Marriott, located at 2101 W Argent Road, Pasco CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 8:30 AM by Pete Serrano, Mayor. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Pete Serrano, David Milne, Blanche Barajas, Melissa Blasdel, Charles Grimm, Peter Harpster, and Leo Perales Councilmembers attending remotely: None Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager; Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; and Lauren Richards, Executive Assistant Facilitator: David Mercier, Kenbrio, Inc. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Mr. Mercier facilitated the Collaboration Initiative and Strategic Thinking Exercise portions of the retreat with Council and staff. Ms. Sigdel presented the Budget Review and Long-Term Planning to Council. Council and staff discussed the budget and long-term planning to meet the needs of Pasco. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 1:00 PM. Page 1 of 2Page 11 of 137 PASSED and APPROVED on _______________________. APPROVED: ATTEST: Pete Serrano, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk Page 2 of 2Page 12 of 137 MINUTES City Council Special Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, April 14, 2025 Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Pete Serrano, Mayor. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Pete Serrano, David Milne, Blanche Barajas, Melissa Blasdel, Charles Grimm, Peter Harpster, and Leo Perales Councilmembers attending remotely: None Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager; Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager; Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; Jesse Rice, Parks & Recreation Director; Ken Roske, Police Chief; Maria Serra, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. NEW BUSINESS Resolutions Nos. 4588, 4589, & 4590 - Use of Temporary Staff Services Ms. Pashon provided a brief report on the proposed personal services agreements with three companies for the purpose of temporary staff services. Ms. Barajas asked for the overall savings by utilizing temporary staff. Mayor Serrano called for public comments three (3) times and no one came forward to speak. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Barajas to approve Resolution No. 4588, authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute a Personal Services Agreement with Advance Services Inc for Page 1 of 2Page 13 of 137 temporary staffing services. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously. 7-0 AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember Grimm, Councilmember Harpster, and Councilmember Perales MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Barajas to approve Resolution No. 4589, authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute a Personal Services Agreement with Infojini Inc for temporary staffing services. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously. 7-0 AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember Grimm, Councilmember Harpster, and Councilmember Perales MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Barajas to approve Resolution No. 4590, authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute a Personal Services Agreement with Personna Employment Solutions for temporary staffing services. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously. 7-0 AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember Grimm, Councilmember Harpster, and Councilmember Perales ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:07 PM. PASSED and APPROVED on _______________________. APPROVED: ATTEST: Pete Serrano, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk Page 2 of 2Page 14 of 137 MINUTES City Council Workshop Meeting 7:05 PM - Monday, April 14, 2025 Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:07 PM by Pete Serrano, Mayor. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Pete Serrano, David Milne, Blanche Barajas, Melissa Blasdel, Charles Grimm, Peter Harpster, and Leo Perales Councilmembers attending remotely: Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager; Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager; Griselda Garcia, Interim Finance Director; Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; Jesse Rice, Parks & Recreation Director; Ken Roske, Police Chief; Maria Serra, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS Mr. Grimm, reported on the Ben Franklin Transit (BFT) Board meeting he recently attended. He also reported on the Tri-Cities Regional Public Facilities District (TCRPFD) Board meeting appointing him as the Secretary of the TCRPFD Board. Lastly, he commented on the Pasco Chamber of Commerce meeting held earlier in the day. Mr. Perales reported on his attendance at the Pasco Police Academy and Jo Jos Freeze Dried Goodies grand opening. He also distributed VIP patches to Girl Scouts over the weekend. Mayor Pro Tem Milne reported on the Jo Jos Freeze Dried Goodies grand opening and the COPA meeting he recently attended. Page 1 of 3Page 15 of 137 Mr. Harpster reported on the Council Retreat held on Saturday, April 12th. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Pasco School District to Discuss the School Impact Fees Mr. Zabell provided a brief history of the City's role related to School Impact Fees and the semiannual process that the Pasco School District (PSD) reviews and sets those fees. He introduced Denise Stiffarm, Pasco School District legal counsel, and Michelle Whitney, Pasco School District Superintendent. Ms. Stiffarm reported on the purpose and history of the Pasco School District's Impact Fees. She provided the recent analysis completed for the next two-year school impact fees based on enrollment forecasts and capacity. She stated that the proposed impact fees will be $0 per single home unit and $2,595 per multi- family unit. Council, Ms. Stiffarm and Ms. Whitney continued discussing the process and method for setting the fees. Mayor Serrano called for public comments three (3) times and no one came forward to speak. Development Fees Discussion Ms. Sigdel provided a brief update on the status of the development fees after additional discussions with the development community. $60 to $100 per hour and confirmation needed regarding a $90K rate study. Councilmembers had the opportunity to provide their preferences and Mayor Serrano summarized Council's direction: 1. Increase the hourly fee from $60 to $150 per hour. 2. Staff review, recommend & seek approval and/or implement process improvements. 3. Then bring back a request for a comprehensive rate study. Mayor Serrano called for public comments three (3) times and no one came forward to speak. Resolution - Second Amendment to RH2 Professional Services Agreement for NW Irrigation System Upgrade Ms. Serra provided a brief report on the proposed second amendment to the RH2 Engineers Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for the northwest irrigation system upgrade. Mayor Serrano called for public comments three (3) times and no one came Page 2 of 3Page 16 of 137 forward to speak. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION Mayor Pro Tem Milne announced the Pasco School District will be hosting an International Night at Chiawana High School scheduled on April 17th from 5:30 to 7:30 PM. Mr. Zabell announced Spring Eggstraganza scheduled for Saturday, April 19th. He announced Police Sgt. Brad Gregory's retirement was scheduled for April 16th at 3:00 PM. Mr. Perales commented on corner street venders and requested more information. Mr. Zabell suggested that Council meet with Code Enforcement, Police and City Attorney at the next Council Workshop to learn roadside vender laws. Mr. Harpster expressed appreciation to Police Sgt. Gregory and will wish him well at the retirement event. He said that he was looking forward to presentation related to corner street venders. He asked for an explanation related to the information generation phase with GMP for the City Manager recruitment. Lastly he asked when was the short term rentals going to come back for Council discussion. Mr. Zabell explained the information gathering phase that GMP needs to create the City Manager recruitment packet. Mr. Zabell suggested that the short term rentals at the next mini retreat to allow time for staff and Council to discuss it in detail, possibly scheduled on a 5th Monday evening. Mr. Grimm also was interested in listening to the discussion on corner street venders and short term rentals. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:41 PM. PASSED and APPROVED on _______________________. APPROVED: ATTEST: Pete Serrano, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk Page 3 of 3Page 17 of 137 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 17, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 4/21/25 FROM: Griselda Garcia, Interim Director Finance SUBJECT: Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of $4,224,212.84 I. ATTACHMENT(S): Accounts Payable 04/03/25 - 04/16/25 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve claims in the total amount of $4,224,212.84 ($1,899,645.50 in Check Nos. 270770 - 271019; $917,462.15 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 849749, 849751 - 849753; $14,580.61 in Check Nos. 54913 - 54919; $1,391,464.66 in Electronic Electronic in $1,059.92 30224124; Nos. 30223490 Transfer - Transfer Nos. 347 - 349). III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 18 of 137 REPORTING PERIOD: April 21, 2025 Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'l Bank Electronic Bank Combined Check Numbers 270770 - 271019 54913 -54919 Total Check Amount $1,899,645.50 $14,580.61 Total Checks 1,914,226.11$ Electronic Transfer Numbers 849749 30223490 - 30224124 347 - 349 849751 - 849753 Total EFT Amount $917,462.15 $1,391,464.66 $1,059.92 Total EFTs 2,309,986.73$ Grand Total 4,224,212.84$ Councilmember B 100 383,386.44 110 3,028.30 140 4,147.73 145 464.76 150 66,458.03 160 6,104.38 165 4,414.50 168 29,384.05 170 380.30 180 601.70 190 90.00 194 732.05 195 74.00 196 HOTEL/ MOTEL EXCISE TAX 9,675.65 367 701,982.52 410 657,792.31 510 31,808.70 520 180.00 690 2,323,507.42 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS:4,224,212.84$ PAYROLL CLEARING EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL MEDICAL/ DENTAL/ VISION INSURANCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STADIUM/ CONVENTION CENTER GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION UTILITY, WATER/ SEWER REVOLVING ABATEMENT CEMETERY ATHLETIC PROGRAMS ANIMAL CONTROL SENIOR CENTER OPERATING MULTI-MODAL FACILITY C.D. BLOCK GRANT MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER AMBULANCE SERVICE Councilmember A SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND: GENERAL FUND STREET City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager Griselda Garcia, Finance Manager We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this 21st day of April, 2025 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment: April 03 - April 16, 2025 C I T Y O F P A S C O Council Meeting of: Accounts Payable Approved The City Council Page 19 of 137 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 15, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 4/21/25 FROM: Maria Serra, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Engineering, RH2 to Amendment Second No. 4591 Resolution - Inc.Professional Services Agreement for NW Irrigation System Upgrade I. ATTACHMENT(S): Resolution Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4591, authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 for the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with RH2 Engineering, Inc. for Northwest Irrigation Systems Expansion Project. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with RH2 Engineering, Inc. (RH2) for the Irrigation System Upgrade project not to exceed $233,857. Summary: Original PSA $295,662 Amendment No. 1 $0 Amendment No. 2 (proposed) $233,857 New PSA Total $529,519 Funding for this project is through the Irrigation Utility. Ordinance No. 4750 - 2025-2026 Biennial Capital Projects Budget - $6,375,245 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In 2018, a detailed evaluation of the City's irrigation system found supply deficiencies within the existing area of service, resulting in low pressure areas Page 20 of 137 with no capacity for expansion. In response, a series of projects and operational changes were initiated by the City. A large part of the effort over the past several years has involved the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) and the South Columbia Basin Irrigation District (SCBID) in order to plan and implement a project where the City purchases water from USBR and it is delivered (wheeled) to the City by SCBID at a location at the end of their canal system. Through collaboration the agencies have developed a viable plan that if fully implemented will be of benefit to all parties. On April 26, 2022, the City entered into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with RH2 to perform a final design for the Municipal & Industrial (M&I) Pump Station and to work with SCBID and Barker Ranch (developer) on delivery and pipeline details to serve both the upper and lower zones within the expanded service area. RH2 was to prepare plans and specification documents required for a complete set of bid documents, provide plans, specifications, finalize and feedback and and for estimate cost review documents for bidding, however as a result of negotiations with SCBID and Barker Ranch, projects needs for the project changed and design needed to be altered. Due to the delays, Amendment No. 1 of the PSA was executed on November 28, 2023, and was a no cost contract extension. During the additional time, the City and RH2 has been pursuing an agreement and requirements for the SCBID water, as well as changes to the pump station site with Barker Ranch. The existing PSA requires amendment to accommodate the extended timeline of the project, as well as addressing permitting requirements, site modification and cross-agency coordination efforts. V. DISCUSSION: This item was presented to Council at the April 14, 2025, Workshop as a discussion item. This contract has been scoped in conjunction with the agreement and use of SCBID irrigation water supply. The proposed Amendment No. 2 scope primarily focuses on updates to the design to coincide with the USBR Municipal & Industrial (M&I) Agreement and the requirements for taking water delivered by SCBID, as well as the changes to the site plan or the irrigation pump station in coordination with the plat adjustments for Barker Ranch. This amendment includes scope and fee for design beginning at 60% and continued assistance in coordination with USBR, Page 21 of 137 SCBID and private development stakeholders. Design changes needed are adjustment of site plan, including a permanent generator, and changes to the SCBID emergency overflow reservoir. Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with RH2 Engineering, Inc. for the Irrigation System Upgrade project. The design completion target is fall 2025 with construction expected to occur in 2026, provided all agreement coordination with USBR and SCBID are substantially completed by Summer of 2025. Page 22 of 137 Resolution – NW Irrigation Systems Expansion PSA Amendment No. 2 - 1 RESOLUTION NO. _________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 2 FOR THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) WITH RH2 ENGINEERING, INC. FOR NORTHWEST IRRIGATION SYSTEMS EXPANSION PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) and RH2 Engineering, Inc. (RH2) entered into a Professional Services Agreement on April 26, 2022, to provide Engineering services with respect to the NW Irrigation Systems Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, the City and RH2 entered into Amendment No. 1 on November 28, 2023, a no cost time extension, to the original engineering contract to complete engineering (design) services; and WHEREAS, the City and RH2 desire to enter into Amendment No. 2 to the professional Services Agreement to provide additional professional engineering services as described in Exhibit A. These additional services include, but not limited to, update to site plan due to the subdivision changes, coordination with South Columbia Basin Irrigation District, and updates to the functionality of the pump station site; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with RH2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Pasco and RH2 Engineering, Inc. as attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Be It Further Resolved, that the Interim City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement on behalf of the City of Pasco; and to make minor substantive changes as necessary to execute this Amendment. Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately. Page 23 of 137 Resolution – NW Irrigation Systems Expansion PSA Amendment No. 2 - 2 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____, 2025. _____________________________ Pete Serrano Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorneys Page 24 of 137 RH2 Engineering, Inc. – Amendment No. 2 to PSA Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade – Project No. 23-242 Version 2.19.2025 Page 1 AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 to PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade PROJECT: 23-242 AGREEMENT NO. 22-013 WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc. entered into a Professional Services Agreement on 4/26/2022 to provide engineering services with respect to the Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade project. WHEREAS, the City and RH2 Engineering, Inc. entered into an Amendment No. 1 to provide additional time of performance on 11/28/2023. NOW, THEREFORE, this agreement is amended to allow RH2 Engineering, Inc. to provide additional engineering services and additional time of performance as described in Exhibit A. 1. Scope of Work: See Exhibit A. 2. Fee: The compensation for the work is based on a Time and Materials Basis not to exceed the amount of $233,857.00 for a total authorization amount of $529,519.00. See Exhibit B. 3. Time of performance: The services shall now be complete for the project on or before 12/31/2026. DATED THIS DAY______________________________. [date of execution] CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON RH2 ENGINEERING, INC. Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager Paul Cross, PE, Principal Page 25 of 137 1 3/31/2025 10:20:12 AM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\22-0079\00 CONTRACT\AMEND NO. 2\AMEND NO. 2_SOW_NW IRR SYSTEM UPGRADE.DOCX Scope of Work Amendment No. 2 City of Pasco Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade April 2025 Background The City of Pasco (City) is planning for water, sewer, and irrigation system expansion to meet Growth Management Act concurrency requirements for the expanded Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundaries proposed by the City’s 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan for land use. The City’s Community and Economic Development Department anticipates that a significant amount of the 20 -year growth will occur in the northwest planning areas that currently are not served by City utilities. The City asked RH2 Engineering, Inc., (RH2) to prepare the Northwest Irrigation System Study to build upon other recent studies prepared by RH2 for the City for both sewer in the Addendum to the Comprehensive Sewer Plan (2021) and irrigation in the Irrigation System Capacity Analysis (2018) and Future Irrigation System Supply (2019) reports. This first phase of the study was intended to develop a preliminary layout of a trunkline irrigation system with proposed pressure zones and to consider the source of supply coming directly or indirectly from the Columbia River, groundwater supplies, the South Columbia Basin Irrigation District (SCBID), or some combination thereof based upon the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative. In the second phase, the City asked RH2 to complete the preliminary design of a Municipal and Industrial (M&I) Pump Station with supply from SCBID. Primary coordination with Barker Heights, Solstice Community (Solstice), and SCBID occurred to determine an interim operational plan for Barker Heights and Solstice and a long-term operational plan with SCBID to draw directly from the Pumping Plant 6.0 lateral (PPL) and recover water from the PPL 6.0 wasteway when it is filled during power outages and canal treatments. The third phase of the study involves performing a final design of the M&I Pump Station and working with SCBID and Barker Heights on delivery and pipeline details to serve both the upper and lower zones within the expanded service area. Preliminary cost estimates and methods of repayment will be advanced as details of the final design and M&I Pump Station service contract with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) are formalized. As discussed with City staff, RH2 has expended the fee originally intended for the final design of the M&I Pump Station due to repeated design changes brought about by City requests and changes in the Barker Heights development, coordination with SCBID, and the City’s Special Use Permit process. Some key changes included multiple changes to the site’s location, dimensions, setbacks, easements, and off-site improvement requirements. Additionally, the design scope has been expanded to include the design of additional improvements both on and off-site to streamline cross-agency coordination and finalize the design. EXHIBIT A Page 26 of 137 City of Pasco Amendment No. 2 Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade Exhibit A – Scope of Work 2 3/28/2025 1:52:26 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\22-0079\00 CONTRACT\AMEND NO. 2\AMEND NO. 2_SOW_NW IRR SYSTEM UPGRADE.DOCX This Scope of Work outlines the remaining effort for final design updates and replenishes the expended budget that was originally intended for permitting assistance, supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) and control system coordination, services during bidding, and limited services during construction. This Scope of Work will be supported by RH2’s subsidiary, Control Systems NW LLC (CSNW), via intercompany subcontract services agreement. Task 1 – Project Management Objective: Administer, manage, and monitor the RH2 project team, resources, communications, scope progress, budget, files, and records. Approach: Review and monitor project progress, schedule, scope, and budget. Manage the RH2 project team and resources. Provide monthly invoices with progress reports documenting work performed and budget status. Communicate with the City regarding project progress, invoicing, and schedule. Maintain electronic project files and records. RH2 Deliverables: • Monthly invoices and progress reports in electronic PDF. Task 2 – Bid-Ready Design Objective: Prepare bid-ready design plans, specifications, and an Engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost (OPCC) for the project. Approach: Coordinate with SCBID to determine the pump station suction line alignment and requirements for the suction line turnout structure and emergency overflow wasteway culverts. Coordinate with the Barker Heights developer’s representative (JF Engineering, Inc., [JF Engineering]) to obtain the AutoCAD and topography files from the Barker Heights Subdivision to use the same topography and boundary files for the M&I Pump Station and transmission main improvements. Prepare the cover sheet, general information drawings, and phasing plan drawing(s). Prepare the site/civil plan drawings showing existing site and facility layouts, temporary erosion control and construction measures and layouts, site grading improvements, proposed facility layouts, surface improvements, and utility improvements. Prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and a Traffic Control Plan. Page 27 of 137 City of Pasco Amendment No. 2 Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade Exhibit A – Scope of Work 3 3/28/2025 1:52:26 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\22-0079\00 CONTRACT\AMEND NO. 2\AMEND NO. 2_SOW_NW IRR SYSTEM UPGRADE.DOCX Prepare the mechanical drawings showing the proposed pipe routing and equipment installation. Size piping and size and select equipment and pumps. RH2 indicated to the City in June 2023 that noise level from the proposed pump may reach approximately 67 dba at nearby properties, with the proposed wall anticipated to help slightly reduce these levels. The City’s Special Use Permit indicates a maximum of 45 dba is allowed at the neighboring properties at night. RH2 indicated it is unlikely that the proposed wall will reduce noise levels at neighboring properties to 45 dba. However, City direction to RH2 has remained that the proposed Pump Station shall be an exterior facility without additional sound dampening improvements. Provide a hydraulic assessment of the proposed improvements , including a surge and transient analysis for pumping to and controlling pressures based upon water levels in the irrigation reservoir at Road 68 and Sandifur Boulevard. a) Analyze up to three (3) scenarios of an extended period simulation of the M&I Pump Station and perform a hydraulic transient analysis using HAMMER. b) Prepare a summary report of the hydraulic transient analysis and mitigation options. c) For this Scope of Work, the surge and transient analysis will be limited to forty (40) hours. Any assistance beyond forty (40) hours is outside of the scope of this contract and will be negotiated through a contract amendment. Prepare structural design, calculations, and details for the proposed pump station slab and ancillary supports and structures. Prepare electrical, instrumentation, and control design, including electrical design, standby generator design, process and instrumentation control, and telemetry systems to interface with the City’s existing system. Prepare design plans for off-site transmission mains. Coordinate points of connection with JF Engineering. Prepare design plans for the PP 6.0 turnout and PPL 6.0 wasteway culverts. Coordinate with SCBID on construction scheduling requirements and delineation of construction responsibilities for inclusion in the specifications. Prepare the OPCC based on 90-percent design documents. Develop non-technical (front-end) and technical specifications. Provide the advertisement for bids, instructions to bidders, general conditions, construction contract, insurance provisions, and other typical forms used for the bidding and engagement of public works contracts. Prepare Division 1 (general) through Division 18 (measurement and payment) of the technical specifications. It is assumed that the front-end documents will be based on City-provided bid forms and construction contract documents and modified by RH2. It is assumed that RH2 will use its modified Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) specifications for the technical specifications. Page 28 of 137 City of Pasco Amendment No. 2 Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade Exhibit A – Scope of Work 4 3/28/2025 1:52:26 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\22-0079\00 CONTRACT\AMEND NO. 2\AMEND NO. 2_SOW_NW IRR SYSTEM UPGRADE.DOCX Perform internal quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) review of the 99-percent design plans and specifications. Submit the 99-percent design plans, specifications, and OPCC to the City, SCBID, and Barker Heights developer’s representative (JF Engineering, Inc.). Prepare meeting agenda and attend one (1) meeting with the City to discuss 99-percent review comments. Prepare meeting minutes. Review and respond to the City’s third-party review of the 90-percent design documents (if any). Incorporate 99-percent and QA/QC review comments and permitting conditions into the plans and specifications. Prepare bid-ready plans and specifications and a final OPCC. Assumptions: • SCBID reviews will be limited to components related to delivery of water from the PP 6.0 lateral, retrieval of water from the PPL 6.0 wasteway, and improvements either crossing or located within the PPL 6.0 wasteway. • SCBID will design or provide adequate details to be incorporated into the plan set for the 30-inch-diameter delivery on the PP 6.0 lateral that will be connected to the M&I Pump Station suction line. • Power extensions for the project will include sufficient three-phase power to the Phase 1, Lot 1 site. The electrical service provider will bring a ground-level pad-mounted transformer to the site for use on this project. • RH2 will rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information, data, and materials generated or produced by the City or others in relation to this Scope of Work. RH2 assumes that the entity providing such information is either the owner of such information or has obtained written authorization from the owner to distribute said information. • Meetings are assumed to take place at the City’s public works and engineering offices but may take place virtually depending on health and safety protocols in effect at the time of the meeting. The City and RH2 will mutually agree on the meeting format. • The design will utilize City standard details and City general contractual conditions and forms to the extent applicable. • The design does not include additional provisions for other utilities. If additional utilities are added to this Scope of Work, an amendment will need to be mutually determined between the City and RH2. • Upon reviewing information, materials, or data provided by others in relation to this project, RH2 will coordinate with the City to identify missing or incomplete information deemed necessary to complete the work. Any work outside of this Scope of Work will be negotiated as part of an amendment. It is assumed that the Barker Heights development plat map and proposed M&I BPS site reviewed with the City on December 3, 2024, reflect the final configuration of the Barker Heights development, and there shall be no additional developer-driven changes requiring another re-design of the M&I BPS. Any additional work Page 29 of 137 City of Pasco Amendment No. 2 Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade Exhibit A – Scope of Work 5 3/28/2025 1:52:26 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\22-0079\00 CONTRACT\AMEND NO. 2\AMEND NO. 2_SOW_NW IRR SYSTEM UPGRADE.DOCX triggered by future changes to the Barker Heights development will be considered work performed outside of this Scope of Work. • It is assumed that the irrigation main construction will be done in the right-of-way (ROW), within dedicated streets of the proposed subdivision, or within a defined easement; therefore, there is no need to research or provide services for easement acquisition. • It is assumed that no utilities with cathodic protection are present in the vicinity of the proposed alignment. Provided by City: • Front-end bid forms and construction contract documents in MS Word format. • Review comments on 90-percent design documents. • Attendance at 99-percent design review meeting. RH2 Deliverables: • Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and Traffic Control Plan in electronic PDF. • Summary report of hydraulic transient analysis in electronic PDF. • Structural calculations in electronic PDF. • 99-percent plans, specifications, and OPCC in electronic PDF. • Meeting agenda and minutes for the 99-percent design review meeting in electronic PDF. • Bid-ready documents in electronic PDF. Task 3 – Permitting Assistance Objective: Assist the City with the preparation of documents and permit submittals to meet local and state requirements for Franklin County’s (County) ROW Permit and encroachment process, as well as other required City permit processes. Approach: Attend up to two (2) meetings with the City to discuss permitting tasks and progress. Prepare meeting agenda and minutes for each meeting. Prepare and submit a ROW Permit application to the County for review and final submittal for irrigation lines encroaching and crossing Burns Road. A ROW Permit from the County is not required for Broadmoor Boulevard and the portion of Burns Road that is within the City limits. Assumptions: • This Scope of Work assumes that previous State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) checklists and determinations for the Barker Heights subdivision are applicable to this project. No additional SEPA coordination is included in this Scope of Work. Page 30 of 137 City of Pasco Amendment No. 2 Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade Exhibit A – Scope of Work 6 3/28/2025 1:52:26 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\22-0079\00 CONTRACT\AMEND NO. 2\AMEND NO. 2_SOW_NW IRR SYSTEM UPGRADE.DOCX • This Scope of Work assumes that previous cultural assessments for Barker Heights and the USBR PPL 6.0 wasteway are applicable to this project. No additional coordination with the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) and affected local Tribes is included in this Scope of Work. • If human remains are found within the project area, all cultural field investigations will cease immediately, proper authorities will be notified, and field investigations will not resume until applicable state laws are addressed. • This Scope of Work assumes that an Inadvertent Discovery Plan (IDP) and a Cultural Resources Survey to assess potential project impacts was provided to DAHP, the Tribes, and other regulatory agencies for consultation as part of the Barker Heights development, and that another IDP will not be required as part of this project. • No engineering report will be required for review and approval. • The City will submit all final permit applications directly. • The City will pay all permit and review fees directly. • No federal or state funds are involved in the project that would require additional coordination. • Reclamation may require additional federal permitting, federal biological assessments, or evaluations. This work is outside of this Scope of Work and will require an amendment to this contract if requested. • Archaeological monitoring, more detailed scientific assessment, or other requirements imposed as part of the permit approval process will require additional authorization and a modification to this Scope of Work. • Permitting-related work will be conducted on a time and expense basis with the goal that the required permitting can be accomplished within the proposed permitting budget included in the attached Fee Estimate. • No date is warranted or implied for agency response or approval and acceptance of permit applications is beyond the control of RH2 and the City. • Meetings are assumed to take place at the City’s public works and engineering offices but may take place virtually depending on health and safety protocols in effect at the time of the meeting. The City and RH2 will mutually agree on the meeting format prior to each meeting. • Preparation and submission of a Reclamation/SCBID Crossing Permit for the PPL 6.0 wasteway for both the upper and lower zone pipelines is covered under a separate contract. Provided by City: • Easement negotiations, if necessary. • Review and comment on draft permit applications prior to submittal. Page 31 of 137 City of Pasco Amendment No. 2 Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade Exhibit A – Scope of Work 7 3/28/2025 1:52:26 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\22-0079\00 CONTRACT\AMEND NO. 2\AMEND NO. 2_SOW_NW IRR SYSTEM UPGRADE.DOCX • Submittal of permit applications and payment of permit application fees. • Determination and publication elements of permit applications. RH2 Deliverables: • One (1) completed County ROW Permit in electronic PDF. • Attendance at up to two (2) meetings with agency and City staff. Meeting agendas and minutes for each meeting in electronic PDF. Task 4 – SCADA and Control System Coordination Objective: Prepare communications and control strategy for the M&I Pump Station to be controlled off the tank level in the irrigation standpipe at Road 68 and Sandifur Boulevard. This Task will be supported by RH2’s wholly owned subsidiary CSNW. Approach: Attend one (1) kick-off meeting with City staff and its SCADA system integrator to discuss communications and control strategies for the M&I Pump Station. Confirm the equipment requirements necessary to meet City standards for communications and control. Identify elements of the work that will be performed by RH2 and CSNW and those that will be performed by City staff and the City’s integrator once the system is ready for startup. Assist the City with controls during startup so that the M&I Pump Station can continue to operate at the delivery flows without interruption, necessitating any changes in supply to occur within the existing City system. Prepare a technical memorandum documenting the control strategy and decisions made. Effort for startup and control assistance is difficult to predict. For this Scope of Work, startup and control assistance will be limited to six (6) hours from RH2 and sixteen (16) hours from CSNW. Any assistance beyond twenty-two (22) hours is outside of the scope of this contract and will be negotiated through a contract amendment. Assumptions: • The City will be required to order an instantaneous supply of water from SCBID and take it at the same rate until the order can be modified through SCBID. This includes adding supplies from the PPL 6.0 wasteway when required. If overall supplies within the City system are greater than demand, the pressure will increase, and the standpipe reservoir will fill. If the reservoir levels exceed control levels, wells and/or the Columbia River Intake supplies will be curtailed to avoid changes in the M&I Pump Station discharge. Provided by City: • Attendance at kick-off meeting. • Programming of the City system to accept communications and reservoir level feedback to the M&I Pump Station site. Page 32 of 137 City of Pasco Amendment No. 2 Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade Exhibit A – Scope of Work 8 3/28/2025 1:52:26 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\22-0079\00 CONTRACT\AMEND NO. 2\AMEND NO. 2_SOW_NW IRR SYSTEM UPGRADE.DOCX • Programming of the City system to adjust supplies to maintain M&I Pump Station flow requirements. RH2 Deliverables: • Attendance at kick-off meeting with City integrator and City staff. Meeting agenda and minutes in electronic PDF. • Technical memorandum summarizing communications and control strategy in electronic PDF. Task 5 – Services During Bidding Objective: Provide engineering assistance throughout the bidding phase to prepare documentation and respond to contractor questions. Approach: Prepare advertisement for bids, contact potential bidders, and coordinate the timing and placement of the bid advertisement with the City. The City will submit the advertisement to the appropriate publications and directly pay for the advertisements. Respond to contractor and supplier questions during bidding, review product prequalification requirements, and document responses to the file. Prepare up to three (3) addenda when determined necessary to clarify, revise, or change construction plans, technical specifications, or project conditions during the bidding process. Attend one (1) site visit with prospective bidders and the City. Review bids and assist the City with the evaluation of the qualifications and references for the apparent low bidder. The City will administer the bid opening and prepare the bid tabulation to confirm total bid prices. The City will prepare and issue the project award recommendation letter. Assumptions: • Because services during bidding can vary in nature, Task 5 services will be performed to the level of effort identified in the attached Fee Estimate. If needed, additional work will be mutually determined by the City and RH2. Provided by City: • Submit and pay for the advertisements to the appropriate publications. • Bid tabulation. • Project award recommendation letter and construction contract execution. RH2 Deliverables: Advertisement for bid in electronic PDF. Written responses to vendor and bidder questions during the advertisement phase, submitted to the City in electronic PDF or via email. Page 33 of 137 City of Pasco Amendment No. 2 Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade Exhibit A – Scope of Work 9 3/28/2025 1:52:26 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\22-0079\00 CONTRACT\AMEND NO. 2\AMEND NO. 2_SOW_NW IRR SYSTEM UPGRADE.DOCX Up to three (3) addenda in electronic PDF. Attendance at one (1) site visit with bidders and the City. Reference check of lowest bidder. Task 6 – Services During Construction (Limited) Objective: Provide technical services during project construction to support the City. As the engineer of record, perform at least one (1) site visit to observe the construction progress. Coordinate with the City and its designated utility and special inspector to respond to technical questions and issues that arise when RH2 is offsite. It is anticipated the City will take the lead in inspection and construction contract administration and will handle day-to-day responsibilities. Approach: Assist the City for a maximum of one hundred twenty (120) hours to perform on -site observation and respond to contractor’s requests for information (RFIs) or change orders. Assumptions: • It is assumed that the City will provide most services during construction. If the City determines it needs technical support from RH2, a maximum of one hundred twenty (120) hours to respond to contractor questions, observe construction activities, observe special inspections, or assist with RFIs and change orders is provided in this Scope of Work and Fee Estimate. Effort for these services in excess of one hundred twenty (120) hours are outside of this Scope of Work and will be negotiated as part of an amendment. • RH2 is not responsible for site safety or for directing the contractor in their work. RH2 Deliverables: • Applicable field observation reports and documentation in electronic PDF. • Written responses to RFIs and change order requests in electronic PDF. Task 7 – Management Reserve Objective: Provide additional services as requested by the City. Approach: Provide additional services as requested and authorized by the City. The City shall provide written authorization to proceed with any supplemental services. RH2 Deliverables: • Other deliverables as requested by the City under the authorization for supplemental services. Page 34 of 137 City of Pasco Amendment No. 2 Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade Exhibit A – Scope of Work 10 3/28/2025 1:52:26 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\PSC\22-0079\00 CONTRACT\AMEND NO. 2\AMEND NO. 2_SOW_NW IRR SYSTEM UPGRADE.DOCX Project Schedule RH2 is prepared to commence with the work upon written authorization from the City. Project construction, startup, and testing is scheduled for completion in April 2027, or ninety-three (93) weeks following authorization to commence work, whichever comes later. Page 35 of 137 EXHIBIT B Fee Estimate Amendment No. 2 City of Pasco Northwest Irrigation System Upgrade Apr-25 Description Total Hours Total RH2 Labor Total Hours Total CSNW Labor Total Expense Total Cost Task 1 Project Management 33 7,601$ --$ 190$ 7,791$ Task 2 Bid-Ready Design 620 131,192$ --$ 13,042$ 144,234$ Task 3 Permitting Assistance 39 9,386$ --$ 976$ 10,362$ Task 4 SCADA and Control System Coordination 8 2,152$ 32 8,608$ 605$ 11,365$ Task 5 Services During Bidding 46 10,656$ --$ 480$ 11,136$ Task 6 Services During Construction (Limited)120 25,566$ --$ 2,614$ 28,180$ Task 7 Management Reserve 80 19,960$ --$ 829$ 20,789$ PROJECT TOTAL 946 206,513$ 32 8,608$ 18,736$ 233,857$ J:\Data\PSC\22-0079\00 Contract\Amend No. 2\Amend No. 2_FEE_NW Irr System Upgrade 3/28/2025 9:52 AMPage 36 of 137 RATE LIST RATE UNIT Professional I $172 $/hr Professional II $188 $/hr Professional III $209 $/hr Professional IV $231 $/hr Professional V $246 $/hr Professional VI $263 $/hr Professional VII $287 $/hr Professional VIII $309 $/hr Professional IX $318 $/hr Technician I $133 $/hr Technician II $146 $/hr Technician III $165 $/hr Technician IV $179 $/hr Technician V $197 $/hr Technician VI $215 $/hr Technician VII $234 $/hr Technician VIII $244 $/hr Control Specialist I $175 $/hr Control Specialist II $191 $/hr Control Specialist III $213 $/hr Control Specialist IV $234 $/hr Control Specialist V $249 $/hr Control Specialist VI $269 $/hr Control Specialist VII $294 $/hr Control Specialist VIII $317 $/hr Control Specialist IX $326 $/hr Control Technician I $134 $/hr Control Technician II $148 $/hr Control Technician III $171 $/hr Control Technician IV $182 $/hr Control Technician V $198 $/hr Control Technician VI $217 $/hr Control Technician VII $236 $/hr Control Technician VIII $247 $/hr Administrative I $89 $/hr Administrative II $104 $/hr Administrative III $122 $/hr Administrative IV $145 $/hr Administrative V $171 $/hr CAD/GIS System $27.50 $/hr CAD Plots - Half Size $2.50 price per plot CAD Plots - Full Size $10.00 price per plot CAD Plots - Large $25.00 price per plot Copies (bw) 8.5" X 11"$0.09 price per copy Copies (bw) 8.5" X 14"$0.14 price per copy Copies (bw) 11" X 17"$0.20 price per copy Copies (color) 8.5" X 11"$0.90 price per copy Copies (color) 8.5" X 14"$1.20 price per copy Copies (color) 11" X 17"$2.00 price per copy Technology Charge 2.50%% of Direct Labor Night Work 10.00%% of Direct Labor Mileage $0.7000 price per mile (or Current IRS Rate) Subconsultants 15%Cost + Outside Services at cost RH2 ENGINEERING, INC. 2025 SCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES Rates listed are adjusted annually. Page 37 of 137 4/21/2025 Pasco City Council Regular Meeting Pa g e 3 8 o f 1 3 7 PSA Amendment No. 2 – NW Irrigation System Upgrade 4/21/2025 Pasco City Council Pa g e 3 9 o f 1 3 7 NW Irrigation System Upgrade Project Overview 3 Pa g e 4 0 o f 1 3 7 NW Irrigation System Upgrade Site Plan and Frontage Updates 4 Proposed Site PlanPrevious Site Plan Pa g e 4 1 o f 1 3 7 NW Irrigation System Upgrade Professional Services Agreement 5 NW Irrigation System Upgrade $295,662Original PSA $0Amendment No. 1 $233,857Amendment No. 2 $529,519New PSA Total Pa g e 4 2 o f 1 3 7 Pa g e 4 3 o f 1 3 7 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 18, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 4/21/25 FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager Finance SUBJECT: General Fund Monthly Report - January 2025 (5 minute staff report) I. ATTACHMENT(S): General Fund Report January Report at a Glance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Attached is the monthly General Fund financial update through January 2025, the City's major fund. The administration will provide quarterly reports to Council for other funds. General Fund reporting is couple of months in arrears due to the timing of receipt of various taxes. However, staff are working on revenue are taxes until wait to projections the eliminate will that need receipted. Moving forward, this effort will generally allow the General Fund report to be provided mid-month following the reported month. V. DISCUSSION: As of the end of January, elapsed time for budget is 4.2%. This is a linear metric that does not always align with City's non-labor costs and revenue, for example on the revenue side property taxes are distributed to the City on a quarterly basis, on the expenditure side, the City's liability insurance premium is paid in one installment in January, supplies and services are charged as they are received. At this time, Staff does not expect any significant variance from Page 44 of 137 the adopted budget for General Fund. Attached to this agenda report is a list of contracts over $100,000 and under $300,000 executed administratively in the month of January. Donations made to the City during the same period are included in the report as well. Page 45 of 137 Monthly General Fund Report January 2025 Financial Highlights The intent of this report is to provide an overview of activity in the City's General Fund through January 31, 2025. This is a snapshot in time, projections and analysis for decision making will prove valuable further in the year as data is collected. Where it came from: Where it went: Page 46 of 137 Budget to Actuals (Elapsed Time: 4.2%) Category 2025-2026 Adopted Budget 2025 Actuals 2025 Encumbrance % Actuals to Budget Expense 169,209,410 5,564,422 1,042,303 3% Operational Capital 576,850 13,769 184,339 2% Debt Interest 7,082,921 - - 0% Debt Principal 3,896,450 - - 0% Personnel Benefits 23,181,518 598,050 - 3% Salaries and Wages 67,851,635 1,562,489 - 2% Overtime 3,407,711 70,963 - 2% Services 50,097,711 3,181,530 625,240 6% Supplies 7,339,614 48,867 232,725 1% Transfers Out-Subsidy 2,875,000 65,360 - 2% Transfers Out-UT Taxes to Streets 2,900,000 23,394 - 1% Revenue 158,674,724 4,119,450 - 3% Charges for Goods and Services 21,194,237 184,814 - 1% Fine and Penalties 2,440,300 125,890 - 5% Intergovernmental 7,519,082 53,483 - 1% Licenses & Permits 6,584,940 153,152 - 2% Miscellaneous 5,624,666 157,559 - 3% Taxes 114,384,039 3,444,551 - 3% Transfer In - Subsidy 295,000 - - 0% Transfer In-Grants 632,460 - - 0% Net Profit (loss)(10,534,686) (1,444,972) Operational Category 2025-2026 Adopted Budget 2025 Actuals 2025 Encumbrance % Actuals to Budget Expense 2,662,000 - - 0% Transfer Out - CIP 2,662,000 - - 0% Revenue - 760,722 - 0% Sale of assets - 760,722 - 0% Net Profit (loss)(2,662,000) 760,722 Capital / Non Operational Page 47 of 137 During the reporting period, expenditures exceeded revenues, resulting in a net loss of $684,250. It is important to note that the timing of revenue receipts and expenditures does not always align. Several key revenue sources—including property taxes, gambling taxes, and admission taxes—are received on a quarterly basis, which can temporarily impact the General Fund's cash flow. Additionally, certain expenditures, particularly in the Services and Supplies categories, do not occur evenly throughout the year. In January, which is the first month of the biennium, 6% of the total Services budget was expended. This reflects typical annual costs such as insurance premiums and software service fees, which are generally paid at the beginning of the year. This spending pattern is consistent with historical trends for the month of January. Page 48 of 137 Expenditures As previously mentioned, January included large one-time payments within the services expense category. During the month, $625,240 was encumbered for upcoming services. Encumbering funds is a beneficial financial practice that allows the City to reserve budgeted amounts for known future obligations. This ensures that funds are available when large, irregular, or contract- based expenses arise later in the fiscal period, supporting more accurate budget tracking and financial planning. The adjacent table highlights wages specific to overtime which were mainly for Public Safety needs. This represents 2% of the biennial budget for overtime. This has historically been a high expense for the City and efforts are underway to reduce expenses in this category. This will be closely monitored throughout the biennium. Page 49 of 137 Revenues The table above reflects tax revenue received during the month of January for 2025 and 2024 for comparison purposes. During January, taxes made up 71% of total revenue received. As seen in the table, sales tax makes up the majority of that revenue. The sales tax rate is 8.9%. The City receives a share of regular sales tax, criminal justice and public safety which are distributed by the State and Franklin County. Growth in the commercial base of the City is providing residents the opportunity to spend their income within the community. Further, the Destination Sales Tax State rule coupled with increase in online retail has contributed to steady growth in sales tax revenue. The bulk of revenues from property tax are received in two installments as the deadlines for timely payment are April 30th and October 31st of each year. While the City received a small amount of payments for property taxes in January 2025, all were for 2024 tax levy or prior. Contracts between $100,000 to $300,000 During January, staff entered into a contract for engineering services for the Sylvester Street Pipe Replacement project. The contract amount is to not exceed $218K. Tax Type 2025 YTD 2024 YTD Sales Tax 2,417,747 2,176,937 Property Tax 66,121 37,117 Utility Tax 942,891 880,979 Gambling & Admission 17,793 17,902 Note: Received in Jan. for prior year activity Page 50 of 137 Permits A variety of economic factors influence the overall health of the community and, by extension, the vitality of the General Fund. One key indicator is permitting activity, which reflects both the growth and desirability of the community, as well as contributes to building-related sales tax revenue. Permitting activity has begun the year at a slower pace, which may be attributed to broader external influences, including the current political and economic climate. Additionally, seasonal factors such as weather conditions can also affect the timing and volume of permit issuance. Staff will continue to monitor permitting trends closely and provide updates as conditions evolve to ensure timely awareness of potential impacts on revenue forecasts. Donations Purpose Donor Amount Winterfest Renewal by Anderson $1,000 Grand Ole Fourth Celebration Renewal by Anderson 1,000 Cinco de Mayo Celebration Port of Pasco 5,000 Reser’s Fine Foods 2,500 Renewal by Anderson 1,000 Fiery Food Festival Port of Pasco 2,500 Renewal by Anderson 1,000 Miscellaneous General Recreational Renewal by Anderson 1,000 Port of Pasco 2,500 Recreational Scholarships Coca-Cola 1,061 Total Donations $18,561 Page 51 of 137 71%16% 3%4% General Fund Report January 2025 A monthly snapshot of Pasco’s General Fund through January 31, 2025 2025 F I N A N I C A L S U M M A R Y A T A G L A N C E Net Position: -$684,250 (temporary due to timing of revenues) Revenue Sources: 71% from taxes Services Budget Used: 6% (front-loaded for insurance/software) Overtime Budget Used: 2% (mostly Public Safety) Encumbered Funds: $625,240 (reserved for future services) W H E R E R E V E N U E C A M E F R O M Parks & Rec Sponsorships and Donations Received (January)$20,061 Taxes Sale of Assets Licenses & Permits Charges for Goods & Services 3% 4% Fines & Penalties Misc. & Intergovernmental During January, taxes made up 71% of total revenue received. As seen below, sales tax makes up the majority of that revenue. The sales tax rate is 8.9%. The City receives a share of regular sales tax, criminal justice and public safety which are distributed by the State and Franklin County. Growth in the commercial base of the City is providing residents the opportunity to spend their income within the community. Further, the Destination Sales Tax State rule coupled with increase in online retail has contributed to steady growth in sales tax revenue. The bulk of revenues from property tax are received in two installments as the deadlines for timely payment are April 30th and October 31st of each year. While the City received a small amount of payments for property taxes in January 2025, all were for 2024 tax levy or prior. Page 52 of 137 5%2%59% E X P E N S E C A T E G O R I E S Transportation Transfers Public Safety C O N T R A C T S P E R M I T T R E N D S Contracts Executed Permits K E Y H I G H L I G H T S Some revenues (like property & gambling tax) are received quarterly Some expenditures are paid early in the year (e.g., insurance) This report reflects a point-in-time snapshot—not final outcomes These insights guide decision-making throughout the biennium Various economic factors impact community health and the General Fund's vitality. A key indicator is permitting activity, which shows community growth and contributes to building-related sales tax revenue. This year, permitting has slowed, likely due to external influences like the political and economic climate, as well as seasonal factors such as weather. Staff will monitor trends closely and provide updates to address potential revenue forecast impacts. 🛠 Sylvester Street Pipe Replacement Firm: MacKay Sposito Amount: Not to exceed $218,000 4%19%12% Natural & Economic General Government Cultural & Community Residential 72.3% Commercial 22.3% Industrial 5.4% January saw significant one-time payments recorded in the services expense category. During this month, $625,240 was allocated for forthcoming services. Encumbering funds is a smart financial strategy that enables the City to set aside budgeted amounts for anticipated future obligations. This practice ensures that funds are readily available for large, irregular, or contract-related expenses that may occur later in the fiscal period, facilitating more accurate budget management and financial planning. Specifically related to overtime, primarily driven by Public Safety needs, accounts for 2% of the biennial budget allocated for overtime, which has historically been a substantial expense for the City. Efforts are currently in progress to reduce costs in this area, and this will be monitored closely throughout the biennium. Page 53 of 137 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 16, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 4/21/25 FROM: Craig Raymond, Deputy Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Request for Zoning Code Text Amendment (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Draft Ordinance - 2021 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff Presentation HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: P&W Developments LLC is seeking to develop certain property located in the C-1 Retail Business Zoning District. Preliminary development plans include a retail fueling station as well as a full-service car wash facility. While a retail fueling station and car wash is generally permitted in the C-1 District, Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Subsection 25.85.020(14) restricts car washes within 300 feet of any residentially zoned district. As such, the intended development proposal would be virtually impossible to authorize under the City's current regulations. Per PMC 25.210.020 (2) c. a property owner may petition the City Council for a text amendment, which P&W Developments LLC has done, In response to the petition, at the March 17, 2025 meeting, the Council determined to conduct an open record hearing to consider the requested text amendment. Page 54 of 137 V. DISCUSSION: The current adopted 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan provides policies for enhancing the environment, which supports the expansion of development and business opportunities while also providing for the compatibility between commercial and industrial developments and residential and mixed-use neighborhoods. Car washes specifically, and similar uses, generally are difficult to fit within a tidy little box. Each development has many variables that will determine the compatibility with surrounding properties. Site size, layout and topography in relationship with adjacent properties will influence impacts. Building design, specific equipment used, and operations will also affect real or perceived impacts. In consideration of this, staff finds that multiple options exist to address the issue: Comprehensive Code Review: In 2021, staff worked with the Planning Commission and presented a draft ordinance to the City Council for consideration that sought to address typical commercial conflicts, traffic minimizing as such issues use drive-through vehicle access and stacking design requirements and noise mitigation measures that reflect other PMC requirements including the noise regulations in Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter 9.130. While the ordinance was never formally voted on it included various provisions including significantly reducing the setback distance to residentially zoned districts from 300 feet to 125 feet, other tangible mitigation measures such as the installation of walls or fences and noise reducing landscaping. Special Use Permit Process: In lieu of specific prescriptive design and mitigation measures, an ordinance could be brought that would amend the PMC to allow car wash operations adjacent to residentially zoned districts through a Conditional Use Permit process. This would enable the consideration of a proposal whereby the applicant would be required to present a noise study report prepared by a qualified professional that demonstrates the provisions of PMC Chapter 9.130 are being met. Any proposal would still be required to adhere to other exiting land use code requirements including setbacks, parking, landscaping and other applicable provisions. While this option provides for more flexibility it does require additional time and expense in study preparation and public hearing scheduling. Page 55 of 137 Maintain Status Quo: Council can elect to support the continuation of current PMC requirements, deeming them appropriate regulations that allow for reasonable development opportunities while providing a measure of protection for properties within residentially zoned districts. Maintain Status Quo with an Exception: Allow for a reduction in the 300-foot setback between a carwash and a residentially zoned district conditioned upon the installation of sound mitigation measures as recommended by a qualified acoustical consultant and evaluated by the consultant for effectiveness prior to use. The intent of the mitigation measures would be to limit the sound from the car wash at the residential zone to what it would be at 300 feet without mitigation measures in place. Other Code Amendment: Council may elect to simply remove the specific provision found in PMC Section 25.85.020(14) thereby not restricting car washes within 300 feet of residentially zoned districts. This approach may create legal conflicts for developers and/or the City if residents of residentially zoned properties challenge whether proposed or constructed facilities do not effectively adhere to the noise provisions of PMC Chapter 9.130 Page 56 of 137 Ordinance – Creating PMC Chapter 25.176 - 1 ORDINANCE NO. __________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, CREATING A NEW CHAPTER 25.176 “DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY DESIGN STANDARDS,” WITHIN TITLE 25 ‘ZONING,” OF THE PASCO MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.11.020, the “legislative body of each code city shall have all powers possible for a city or town to have under the Constitution of this state, and not specifically denied to code cities by law;” and WHEREAS, the City, pursuant to PMC 21.05.020 has identified the benefits in regulating the division of land within the City to promote the health, safety, convenience, comfort, urban infill, prosperity and general welfare of the present and future residents of the City; and WHEREAS, Land-Use Policy 1-B of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan states the City’s policy is to enhance the physical appearance of development within the community through land use regulations, design guidelines, and performance and maintenance standards including landscaping, screening, building facades, color, signs, and parking lot design and appearance; and WHEREAS, Economic Development Policy 1-A of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan states the City’s policy is to promote an environment which supports the development and expansion of business opportunities; and WHEREAS, Economic Development Policy 3-A of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan states the City’s policy is to enhance compatibility of commercial and industrial development with residential and mixed-use neighborhoods with appropriate landscaping, screening, building and design standards; and WHEREAS, Transportation Policy 1-C of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan states the City’s policy is to minimize traffic conflicts on the arterial street system by implementing access and corridor management best practices; and WHEREAS, Implementation Policy 1-A of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan states the City’s policy is to maintain city codes, standards and guidelines which are clear, concise, and objective. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 25.176 entitled “Drive-Through Facility Design Standards” within Title 25 “Zoning” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is created and shall be read as follows: Page 57 of 137 Ordinance – Creating PMC Chapter 25.176 - 2 Chapter 25.176 DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY DESIGN STANDARDS Sections: 25.176.010 Purpose. 25.176.020 Application. 25.176.030 Setbacks. 25.176.040 Location. 25.176.050 Parking and Circulation. 25.176.060 Vehicle Stacking Lane Standards. 25.176.070 Noise. 25.176.080 Site Planning. 25.176.010 Purpose. The regulations of this chapter are intended to allow for drive-through facilities as an accessory use to permitted commercial uses and to mitigate the impacts such uses create. Of special concern are noise from idling cars and voice amplification equipment, lighting and queued traffic interfering with on-site and off-site traffic and pedestrian flow. The specific purposes of this chapter are to: (1) Reduce noise, lighting and visual impacts on abutting uses, particularly residential uses; (2) Improve safety and promote more efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; and (3) Foster and facilitate economic development.. 25.176.020 Applicability and Application. The regulations of this Chapter apply to all uses that have drive-through facilities, and include: (1) “Drive-through facilities” means an establishment that sells products or provides services to occupants in vehicles or that services vehicles at drive up to service areas, including drive-in or drive-up windows and drive through services. A drive-through facility is composed of two parts – the stacking lanes and the vehicle-related service area. The stacking lanes are the space occupied by vehicles queueing for the service to be provided. The vehicle-related service area is where the service occurs. In businesses with service windows, such as coffee shops, the vehicle-related service area starts at the service window. In businesses where the service occurs indoors, such as car washes, the vehicle-related service area is the area within the building where the service occurs. For other drive-through facilities, such as gas pumps, air compressors, vacuum cleaning stations, the service area is the area where the vehicles are parked during the service. Other examples of drive-through facilities include, but are not limited to, fast-food restaurants, banks, dry cleaners, and pharmacies. Page 58 of 137 Ordinance – Creating PMC Chapter 25.176 - 3 (2) The regulations of this chapter apply only to the portions of the site development that comprise the drive-through facility. The regulations apply to new developments, the addition of drive-through facilities to existing developments, and the relocation or business license renewal of an existing business operating a drive-through facility. (3) Any property owner applying for or renewing a business license or applying for a binding site plan which proposes a drive-through facility shall submit a site plan of the drive-through facility as part of the underlying permit or license application to the Director of Community and Economic Development or designee. The site plan shall consist of two (2) copies (at a scale of at least one inch to one hundred feet) of the entire contiguous tract owned by the applicant, in a paper format of eighteen (18) inches × twenty-four (24) inches with two inch margins. In addition, one copy of the map shall be submitted to the City in a digital or electronic format as a Portable Document Format (PDF). The site plan shall accurately depict the proposed drive-through facility. Applicants seeking to renew a business license need not resubmit identical site plans if the layout of the facility has not changed since the last licensing period. (4) In addition to the site plan, additional documentation may be required to ensure compliance with drive-through facility code standards, as determined by the Director of Community and Economic Development or designee. Such information may include information needed to determine the accuracy of information provided (e.g. length of stacking lanes). The Directors may return any incomplete or inaccurate application materials, including site plans, submitted. (5) Drive-through facilities lawfully established prior to passage of this code that do not meet the requirements of this section shall be an established nonconforming use. Such facilities shall still be required to comply with the other requirements of this section, such as submitting a site plan. Existing drive-through facilities may be modified, enlarged, or expanded if the applicant meets all requirements of this chapter. Nothing in this Chapter shall be construed as permitting any violation of any applicable building or fire code. 25.176.030 Setbacks. All drive-through facilities shall comply with the setback requirements stated below. (1) Service areas and stacking lanes must be set back a minimum of five feet from all lot lines. (2) Service areas and stacking lanes must be set back five feet from all public transportation rights of way such as sidewalks. (3) Drive-through facilities in such locations lawfully established prior to passage of this code shall be an established nonconforming use. 25.176.040 Location. Applications submitted for drive-through facilities shall comply with the location requirements as follows: Page 59 of 137 Ordinance – Creating PMC Chapter 25.176 - 4 (1) Drive-through facilities shall not be permitted within 125 feet of a residentially zoned, or Comprehensive Plan designated residential property. (a) Measured as the entry point of the drive-through stacking lane to the nearest driveway or other entry point of the residential property or subdivision (e.g. dedicated road). (b) Distance between the two points shall be measured by calculating the shortest route between the two points that can be achieved through lawful vehicular travel. (2) Drive-through facilities shall not be approved within 300 feet of a signalized intersection operating at a Level of Service (LOS) D or below unless a traffic impact analysis has been submitted and demonstrates that the use will not impair the efficiency or operation of the intersection. (a) Measured as the distance between the entry point of the drive-through stacking lane and the intersection centroid, or midpoint. (b) Distance between the two points shall be measured by calculating the shortest route between the two points that can be achieved through lawful vehicular travel. (3) All driveway entrances, including stacking lane entrances, must be located at least 175 feet from a public street intersection. (a) Measured as the distance between the entry point to the establishment and the intersection centroid, or midpoint. (b) Distance between the two points shall be measured by calculating the shortest route between the two points that can be achieved through lawful vehicular travel. (4) Drive-through facilities, including stacking lane entrances, must be located at least 150 feet from adjacent drive-through facilities existing prior to the date of application of the new facility. (a) Measured as the entry point from each drive-through establishment. (b) Shared entrances are permitted. (c) Distance between the two points shall be measured by calculating the shortest route between the two points that can be achieved through lawful vehicular travel. (d) Where two applicants proposing new drive-through facilities within 150 feet are submitted at the same time, the first applicant submitting a completed application shall be considered an existing facility for the purposes of this section; provided, the existing facility under this section timely obtains a permit. Page 60 of 137 Ordinance – Creating PMC Chapter 25.176 - 5 (5) Drive-through facilities are not permitted in the Central Business District, C-2 Zoning District. 25.176.050 Parking and Circulation. (1) The primary ingress and egress of a drive-through facility shall be from a collector roadway or higher. (2) Reciprocal access between abutting drive-through establishments shall be required where feasible so that vehicles are not required to enter the public right-of-way to move from one area to another on the same or adjacent site. (3) Drive-through facilities shall provide separate queuing and circulation for drive-through customers that does not interfere with or prohibit pedestrian traffic flow. Drive-through establishments with a stacking lane between the establishment and its designated parking areas shall provide at least one internal pedestrian crosswalks to facilitate walk-in or walk-up pedestrian access, as described in PMC 25.176.060(9). (4) For drive-through establishments only, a parking reduction of up to 25% may be approved if the application clearly indicates that the establishment is for carry—out business only, with no indoor dining and shall be approved by the Community and Economic Development Department. 25.176.060 Vehicle Stacking Lane Standards. These regulations ensure that there is adequate on-site maneuvering and traffic circulation, ensure that stacking vehicles do not impede traffic, and that stacking lanes will not have nuisance impacts on abutting residential lands. (1) Customer drive-through and stacking lanes shall provide pavement markings and directional signage for vehicle access. (2) The entry point of the stacking-through stacking lane shall be located as deep into the site as possible, and shall no less than 75 feet from the entrance approach entering from a public street. (3) Customer drive-through stacking lanes shall have a minimum entrance approach width of 12 feet and a 25-foot turning radius at curves. (4) Customer drive-through stacking lanes shall accommodate 20 feet per vehicle, and at a minimum provide the appropriate capacity as stated below for their use: Use Capacity Financial Institutions 160 feet Coffee – Indoor seating 200 feet Pharmacy 60 feet Page 61 of 137 Ordinance – Creating PMC Chapter 25.176 - 6 (5) Applicants may apply for and be granted a reduced stacking lane capacity from the requirements of PMC 25.176.060 where sufficient evidence is submitted and accepted that demonstrates that a reduction will not impair access or safety on and off site within 300 feet of the site on adjacent public rights-of-way. Documentation shall include the most currently available traffic counts (no older than 2 years), level of service, operational efficiency, and customer projections. Information must be verified during annual business license renewal. (6) Drive-through establishments located within US 395, Oregon Avenue, Highway 12 and the Columbia River shall be constructed to meet the requirements of this chapter to the fullest extent, as determined by the Department of Community and Economic Development. (7) Customer drive-through stacking lanes shall be measured from the center of the last service window to the entry point of the lane. (8) The drive-through stacking lane shall be situated so that any overflow from the stacking lane does not spill out onto a public street or aisleway of any parking lot. (9) The drive-through stacking lane shall not disrupt any public sidewalk. Where the stacking lane does intersect an internal pedestrian pathway or accessway, as required under PMC 25.176.050(3), raised or decorative pavement and signage shall be provided. 25.176.070 Noise. (1) Drive-through speakers shall not be audible to residents or owners of adjacent residentially used, zoned or Comprehensive Plan designated properties. (2) Drive-through windows are discouraged on any building directly facing a public right-of- way. Espresso – Stand Alone < 500 sqft 100 feet Restaurants 200 feet Self-Service Carwashes 40 feet Full-Service Carwashes 200 feet Gasoline Stations 30 feet Other Capacity requirements determined on an individual basis and shall require supplemental documentation, including the most currently available traffic counts (no older than 2 years), level of service, operational efficiency, and customer projections. as determined necessary by the Department. Page 62 of 137 Ordinance – Creating PMC Chapter 25.176 - 7 (3) The noise, exhaust fumes and lighting impacts of automobiles on adjacent residential properties as they queue to wait for drive-through services shall be minimized to the maximum extent practical through the installation of six foot high, sight obscuring, fencing constructed of masonry, vinyl or wood fencing along with other sound dampening with landscaping along any residential property line that is exposed to the drive-through or by the enclosure of the drive- through facility facing such residential property line. Any business containing a drive-through facility must also comply with the Landscaping Standards of PMC 25.180.050. In the event any conflict arises, the provisions in this Chapter shall apply with respect to the drive through facility area of the commercial establishment. (4) Use of sound attenuation walls and landscaping, including a minimum six-foot-high, sight obscuring fence, constructed of masonry, vinyl or wood, shall be constructed along said interior property lines; provided, such fences comply with the required setback requirements when adjacent to or abutting a residentially used, zoned or Comprehensive Plan properties. (5) The application shall provide information that the establishment can and will remain compliant with the environmental noise level regulations of Pasco Municipal Code 9.130. To the extent these regulations conflict with the noise PMC 9.130, the more restrictive regulations shall apply. 25.176.080 Site Planning. (1) Buildings should be placed close to and oriented towards the street. (2) Outdoor dining and seating areas should be located near the main pedestrian entrance. (3) Where applicable, walk-up windows shall be located near outdoor dining areas or other pedestrian areas, to encourage accessibility and limit vehicle and pedestrian conflicts. (4) Service or loading areas should be located to minimize noise and incompatibility with surrounding properties. (5) Windows and indoor dining areas should face onto pedestrian spaces and the public-right- of-way. (6) Parking lots shall be illuminated with lights directed and shielded to prevent light and glare from illuminating adjacent lots. (7) Where the site is located within 200 feet of an adjacent existing or planned public transportation stop, the applicant shall contact Ben Franklin Transit and document opportunities to provide enhanced pedestrian access or coordinated furnishings/shelter if the stop is located along the frontage of the site. Section 2. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. Page 63 of 137 Ordinance – Creating PMC Chapter 25.176 - 8 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this ____ day of _____________, 2022. _____________________________ Blanche Barajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Published: _________________________ Page 64 of 137 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 16, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 4/21/25 FROM: Jesse Rice, Director Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: *Resolution No. 4592 - Quote Rejection for City View Cemetery Estate Fence (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Resolution II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4592, rejecting all quotes for Quote No. 24-977 for City View Cemetery Estate Fence. III. FISCAL IMPACT: See Below IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: City View Cemetery, located off Oregon Ave adjacent to the highway and rail yard has historically and currently experiences issues after-hours including:  Theft from the adjacent City Parks and Facilities storage yards, shops and vehicles  Damage to grave markers including headstones and urns  Theft of flowers or other grave site momentos  Drinking and partying  Overnight camping To help mitigate these problems City Council approved the installation of an "Estate" style fence, constructed of block pillars and wrought iron panel sections, built to meet City design standards, as a 2023 CIP Project with a budget of $350,000 from the General Fund. Due to a possible change of ownership and access easement with a privately Page 65 of 137 owned adjacent parcel staff waited for final design and quote process to ensure access compatibility delaying overall install until late 2024. A formal request for quote submittal (Quote No. 24-977) for the construction and installation of an estate fence at City View Cemetery was issued on December 11, 2024. Five (5) bids were received and were opened on December 30, 2024. The lowest responsive quote received was submitted by Superior Welding and Fabrication for $409,344.21 and far exceeded the budgeted amount. Therefore, it was determined that the best course of action for the City is to reject all quotes and re-advertise for new quotes. Staff have updated the design to use fewer block pillars with more fence panels and posts, requiring less materials and installation labor, to help align future quotes with authorized budget. V. DISCUSSION: Staff requests City Council approve the proposed Resolution rejecting all quotes for the estate fence at City View Cemetery and authorize the City Manager or their designee to issue a new call for quotes at a later date with an updated design that fits within budgeted funds. Page 66 of 137 Resolution - Reject Cemetery Fence Quotes - 1 RESOLUTION NO. ____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, REJECTING ALL QUOTES RECEIVED FOR QUOTE NO. 24-977 FOR CITY VIEW CEMETERY ESTATE FENCE. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) identified a need for the construction and installation of an estate fence at City View Cemetery; and WHEREAS, the City solicited public quotes for the construction and installation of an estate fence at City View Cemetery, provided as Quote No. 24-977, City View Cemetery Wall Project; and WHEREAS, on December 30, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., five (5) quotes were received and opened by the City; and WHEREAS, all five (5) quotes were considerably higher than the available budget for this project, the lowest being Superior Welding at $409,344.21 and the highest being Northwest Fence Company at $820,853.35; and WHEREAS, after careful review, the City has determined that none of the quotes were in the City’s best interest to award. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That all quotes received for Quote No. 24-977, City View Cemetery Wall Project, are hereby rejected, and the City Manager or their designee is hereby authorized to revise and make further calls for quotes in the same manner as the original call for the project. Be It Further Resolved that this Resolution shall take effect immediately. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of April, 2025. _____________________________ Pete Serrano Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorneys Page 67 of 137 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 15, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 4/21/25 FROM: Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager City Manager SUBJECT: *Resolution No. 4593 - Memorandum of Understanding for Tri-Cities Regional staff minute Administration (3 Facility Public District presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Resolution Memorandum of Understanding II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4593, authorizing the Interim City Manager to sign the Memorandum of Understanding for Tri-Cities Regional Public Facilities District Administration. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Up to $2,000 annually IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The Tri-Cities Regional Public Facilities District (TCRPFD) was formed to authorize projects voter for public propose and authority taxing regional consideration within the Tri-Cities area. Any proposed projects must receive voter approval from the residents of Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland to proceed with funding. TCRPFD Directors, equal with Board of a by governed is nine-member representation from each of the three cities. Board Members are appointed— three Pasco, each—by the respective City Councils of Kennewick, and Richland. TCRPFD management is responsible for ensuring compliance with applicable laws and safeguarding public resources from fraud, loss, or abuse. This Page 68 of 137 includes maintaining effective internal controls and adhering to reporting requirements established under state law (RCW 43.09.230). These requirements include the preparation and submission of certified annual reports to the State Auditor’s Office, summarizing revenues, collections, payables, expenditures, and outstanding debt. V. DISCUSSION: Since its establishment in 2010, the Benton-Franklin Council of Governments (BFCOG) has provided administrative support services to the TCRPFD under a direct agreement with the District’s board. Due to the absence of a direct funding stream, TCRPFD operational expenses have historically been covered by the three participating cities. To streamline operations and formalize cost-sharing arrangements, the three cities have agreed to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with BFCOG. Under this agreement, BFCOG will continue to provide administrative services on behalf of the cities. Each city will reimburse BFCOG for its share of the expenses, including direct staff time (billed at cost plus federally negotiated indirect rates) and other eligible expenses. The total cost will be equally divided among the three cities and will not exceed $6,000 annually per city. This new MOU simplifies the previously duplicative expenditure approval and reimbursement processes, improving administrative efficiency while the TCRPFD remains in its early planning and development stages. Staff recommends approval of the resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute the MOU with Kennewick, Richland, and the Benton- Franklin Council of Governments for continued administrative support services to the TCRPFD. Page 69 of 137 Resolution – MOU for TCRPFD Administration - 1 RESOLUTION NO. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO SIGN A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE TRI-CITIES REGIONAL PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, the Tri-Cities Regional Public Facilities District (TCRPFD) was formed in 2010 to authorize taxing authority and propose regional public projects for voter consideration within the Tri-Cities area. Any proposed projects must receive voter approval from the residents of Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland to proceed with funding; and WHEREAS, the TCRPFD is governed by a nine-member Board of Directors, with equal representation from each of the three Cities. Board members are appointed by the respective City Councils of Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland; and WHEREAS, since its establishment, the Benton-Franklin Council of Governments (BFCOG) has provided administrative support services to the TCRPFD under a direct agreement with the TCRPFD’s Board. Due to the absence of a direct funding stream, TCRPFD operational expenses have historically been covered by the three participating cities; and WHEREAS, the intent of the Memorandum of Agreement (MOU) is to streamline operations and formalize cost-sharing arrangements among the three cities wherein each City will reimburse BFCOG for its share of the expenses, including direct staff time (billed at cost plus federally negotiated indirect rates) and other eligible expenses. The total cost will be equally divided among the three cities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City Council of the City of Pasco hereby authorizes the Memorandum of Understanding for Tri-Cities Regional Public Facilities District Administration with the Benton- Franklin Council of Governments; a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A. Be It Further Resolved, that the Interim City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to sign and execute the Memorandum of Understanding. Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately. Page 70 of 137 Resolution – MOU for TCRPFD Administration - 2 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of ______, 2025. _____________________________ Pete Serrano Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorneys Page 71 of 137 Page 72 of 137 Page 73 of 137 Page 74 of 137 Page 75 of 137 Page 76 of 137 Page 77 of 137 Page 78 of 137 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 17, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 4/21/25 FROM: Maria Serra, Public Works Director Public Works SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4594 - United States Bureau of Reclamation Municipal and Industrial (M&I) Water Service Contract (5 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Resolution Bureau of Reclamation Municipal and Industrial (M&I) Water Service Contract II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4594, authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute a Municipal and Industrial Water Supply Contract with the United States Bureau of Reclamation. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Water Purchase: $48/Acre-Feet of water paid annually to USBR established in the M&I Contract Delivery of Water: $184,000 paid annually to the South Columbia Irrigation District (SCBID) for Capital and O&M for delivery of the first 1,600 Acre-Feet of water, and $115/Acre-Feet annually for contracted quantities exceeding 1,600 acre-feet. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City's irrigation utility system serves over 9,500 customers and operates independent of the City’s potable water system. Water for the utility is currently sourced from an intake at the Columbia River along with 11 well sites. To provide for the planned expansion and reliability of the irrigation system, over the several years the City, the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) and the South Columbia Basin Irrigation District (SCBID) have been planning and collaborating on a project in which the City purchases water from Page 79 of 137 USBR which is delivered to the City by SCBID at a location in the end of the canal systems. Through collaboration the agencies have developed a viable system that would be of benefit to all parties. V. DISCUSSION: The foundation for this initiative is established through the Municipal and Industrial Contract with the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) for the purchase of 1,000-acre feet of water to support the irrigation utility. This infusion of water is critical to addressing the utility's current challenges in meeting existing customer demand. Additionally, this agreement alleviates the immediate continued for rights water the acquire to pressure additional operation and sustainability of the irrigation system. The cost of the water purchase, delivery and capital and O&M needs for the utility to operate this new facility have been considered in the most recent Cost of Service and Revenue Requirement Analysis (rate Study) for irrigation. Roles and responsibilities are identified in the proposed agreement. Legal review of the agreement was provided by a specialized attorney in water law. Key Contract Provisions of the M&I agreement are identified below:  Contract Term and Termination The with for option the years, automatic for last will contract 10 renewals, up to a maximum of 40 years. There is no obligation for the City to continue receiving water once the contract ends. The City may terminate the contract by providing notice before November 1 of the year before the termination date. The agreement also establishes a price to subject $48/AF at USBR an to owed Acre-Feet per the inflationary escalation.  Water Availability and Usage The City will have access to municipal and industrial (M&I) water on an interruptible basis, meaning water supply may be limited depending on federal priorities. The contract allows for up to 1,000 acre-feet (AF) of water, with delivery only during the irrigation season. If federal laws, like the Endangered Species Act, affect water availability, service may be reduced or stopped altogether.  Water Quality and Liability The water provided is "as-is" and the City is responsible for treating it as necessary to meet its intended uses. No treatment is anticipated for this water. The U.S. government makes no guarantees regarding water quality. of use proper the The also must City the ensure water, preventing waste or hazards, and USBR will be held harmless for any Page 80 of 137 issues related to water quality or damage resulting from its use. The Contract provides that SCBID is responsible for operating the lower conveyance system and delivering water to the City, but no contract exists between the City and District yet. A permit between SCBID and the City will be issued prior to the time of commencement of service for this service. In the months leading to this presentation City Staff and SCBID have coordinated on operational needs and have identified a delivery rate per Acre-Feet owed to the district for the operational costs and capital investments necessary to serve the City. This rate was confirmed by the Board of Directors at the district on April 10, 2025. Expansion of the contract is being explored between the parties including:  Absorbing existing private M&I contracts for urban developments in the vicinity of the pump station; and  An additional allocation from USBR into this system, as water becomes available. These may require future amendments to the current M&I Contract or separate M&I contracts for ease of management and tracking. Staff recommends approval of the proposed M&I Contract. Page 81 of 137 Resolution – USBR M&I Water Service Contract - 1 RESOLUTION NO. _________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVICE CONTRACT WITH THE UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) owns and operates an irrigation utility with a growing service area; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) recognizes the necessity to secure a reliable additional water supply for its municipal irrigation utility; and WHEREAS, the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) is authorized to enter into contracts for water supply for municipal and industrial purposes under the Reclamation Act of 1902, as amended and supplemented; and WHEREAS, the City has negotiated the terms of a Municipal and Industrial (M&I) Water Service Contract with the USBR to provide supplemental water supply for the City’s irrigation systems; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into the M&I Water Service Contract with the USBR. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the M&I Water Service Contract between the City of Pasco and the USBR as attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Be It Further Resolved, that the Interim City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said M&I Contract on behalf of the City of Pasco; and to make minor substantive changes as necessary to execute this Contract. Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately. Page 82 of 137 Resolution – USBR M&I Water Service Contract - 2 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____, 2025. _____________________________ Pete Serrano Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorneys Page 83 of 137 1 Contract No. 24XX160119 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Columbia Basin Project, Washington MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVICE CONTRACT Contents Article Title Page No. No. Preamble ........................................................................................................... 1 1-8 Explanatory Recitals ......................................................................................... 1-2 9 Definitions......................................................................................................... 2-3 10 Term of Contract ............................................................................................... 3 11 Availability of Water ....................................................................................... 4 12 Payments for Water........................................................................................... 4-6 13 Contract Administration Fees .......................................................................... 6 14 Measurement and Responsibility for Distribution ............................................ 6-8 15 Contractor to Provide Safe, Suitable, and Lawful Water.................................. 9 16 Contractor Agrees to Comply With All Applicable Laws ................................ 9 17 Water Provided As-Is, Where ........................................................................... 10 18 Title to Project Works ....................................................................................... 10 19 Termination of Contract ................................................................................... 10-11 20 Environmental Resources and Contract Compliance Reviews ......................... 11-12 21 Standard Provisions ......................................................................................... 12-13 Signatures .......................................................................................................... 14 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................ 15 Exhibit A Exhibit B Page 84 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 1 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT, WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVICE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND CITY OF PASCO THIS CONTRACT, made this day of , 20___, pursuant to the Act of Congress approved June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388), and acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, and particularly Section 9(c)(1)(B) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (53 Stat. 1187) as amended, collectively known as the Federal Reclamation laws, between THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, referred to as the United States, represented by the officer executing this contract, referred to as the Contracting Officer, and CITY OF PASCO, referred to as the Contractor; WITNESSETH THAT; EXPLANATORY RECITALS 1. WHEREAS, the United States, acting through the Bureau of Reclamation, constructed the Columbia Basin Project, Washington (the “Project”), and has water rights thereon, including those for municipal, industrial, and miscellaneous purposes (“M&I water”); and 2. WHEREAS, the Contractor desires to enter into a contract with the United States for M&I water to be available beginning in the 2025 irrigation season to have assurance to build the infrastructure for the use of M&I water to be conveyed and delivered to PEC HEADWORKS Page 85 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 2 to supplement their residential irrigation system water supply for lawn and landscape maintenance beginning with the 2025 irrigation season; and 3. WHEREAS, the United States has determined that it is in the best interest of the Project that M&I water be made available for the proposed use on an interruptible basis for the period covered by this contract; and 4. WHEREAS, use of the M&I water by the Contractor, in the manner and upon the terms and conditions provided in this contract, is in the public interest and will not impair the efficiency of the Project for irrigation and other authorized purposes or the rights of the South Columbia Basin Irrigation District (the “District”); and 5. WHEREAS, the Contractor recognizes that delivery of the water made available by this contract to PP6.0 Lateral will depend on the Contractor independently working with the District because the United States’s obligation under this contract is only to make the water available at PEC HEADWORKS; and 6. WHEREAS, the Contractor recognizes that the United States has no responsibility for ensuring that any water is delivered from PEC HEADWORKS to the PP6.0 lateral; and 7. WHEREAS, the Contractor agrees to use this water only for lawn and landscape maintenance and not for any domestic purposes; 8. WHEREAS, Categorical Exclusion Checklist CPN-EFO-CE-2024-038 was issued on February 2, 2025; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and dependent covenants herein stated, it is agreed as follows: DEFINITIONS 9. The following terms, as used in this contract, shall have the following respective meanings: Page 86 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 3 “Irrigation” shall mean the use of contract water to irrigate land primarily for the production of commercial agricultural crops or livestock, and domestic and other uses that are incidental thereto. “Municipal and Industrial” or “M&I” shall mean the use of contract water for municipal, industrial, and miscellaneous other purposes not falling under the definition of “irrigation” use above or within another category of water use under an applicable Federal authority. TERM OF CONTRACT 10. (a) This contract shall become effective as of the date first above written and will have a term of not to exceed 10 years; Provided; that this contract will automatically renew for a period of not to exceed 10 years at the end of 10, 20, and 30 years from the date first above written unless sooner terminated in accordance with Article 19, Provided however; that this contract does not qualify as a long-term contract under the Act of June 21, 1963 (77 Stat. 68) and in no event shall this contract be in effect beyond 40 years through automatic renewals. This contract will not automatically renew for a period of not to exceed 10 years if at any point a notice of non-renewal was provided in accordance with Article 19(c). (b) It is understood and agreed that the furnishing of water herein provided shall not be considered as binding the Contracting Officer to furnish water to said Contractor after the end of said contract period, neither shall this contract under any circumstances become the basis of a beneficial interest in the water delivered nor a legal right to it. The Contractor, for itself, its successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through it, hereby expressly consent that at the expiration or termination of this contract, the use of water provided herein shall terminate and revert to the United States as fully as if this contract had never been made, and no water had ever been furnished. Page 87 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 4 AVAILABILITY OF WATER 11. (a) Subject to the conditions, exceptions, and reservations set forth herein and the availability of M&I water in quantities sufficient to fulfill the requirements of this contract without impairing the efficiency of the Project for irrigation, and without creating a temperature impairment for the delivery of Project water for irrigation, or for any other authorized purposes, the United States hereby authorizes the Contractor to use up to One Thousand (1,000) acre-feet of M&I water to be conveyed and delivered from the PEC Headworks during the irrigation season, as provided in this contract for lawn and landscape maintenance. The anticipated point of diversion is the PP6.0 lateral, which is shown in Exhibit B, although the United States is only responsible for making water available at PEC Headworks. The Contractor understands and agrees that (1) under this contract, the United States will only deliver water to the PEC Headworks, (2) that because the District has responsibility for operating the delivery works beyond the PEC Headworks, the Contractor must independently work with the District to have the water delivered to the PP6.0 lateral, and (3) that the United States has no responsibility for ensuring that the water under this contract is delivered to the PP6.0 lateral, for assisting the Contractor in working with the District, or for any act or omission beyond the PEC Headworks. (b) Contracted water quantities may be reduced at the Contracting Officer’s discretion based on the Contractor’s peak water use prior to any irrigation season, but in no event after payment has been accepted by both the United States and the District pursuant to Article below. PAYMENTS FOR WATER 12. (a) Payment to the United States and the District in advance of any delivery of water is a condition precedent to delivery of the water. (b) The Contractor shall pay the District in advance of delivery of water Page 88 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 5 under this contract each year a conveyance and delivery charge to be determined by the District. No part of the payment will be refunded in the event the Contractor does not utilize its allocated quantity of water due to no fault of the Contracting Officer or the District. If the District fails to determine a conveyance and delivery charge, then the Contractor must inform the Contracting Officer in writing, and the Contracting Officer may provide the Contractor with alternative instructions to follow, but in no instance will the Contracting Officer be obligated to do so. (c) (1) The Contractor shall pay the United States the sum of $48,000.00, on or before March 1, 2025, and a like payment annually afterwards on or before March 1 of each succeeding year during the term of this contract, which shall entitle the Contractor to receive up to One Thousand (1,000) acre-feet of M&I water. No part of the payment will be refunded in the event Contractor does not utilize its allocated quantity of water due to no fault of Contracting Officer. No part of the payment will be refunded in the event the United States delivers water to the PEC Headworks, but the District does not deliver water, whether at all or in a way to make the water useful to the Contractor. Similarly, if the United States delivers water to the PEC Headworks but the District does not deliver water, whether at all or in a way to make the water useful to the Contractor, the Contractor shall still be obligated to pay the United States in full under this contract. (2) If contracted water quantities are reduced pursuant to Article 11(b) the payment required in Article 12(c)(1) will be reduced in proportion to the reduction in water quantity. (3) The annual payment set forth in Article 12(c)(1) of this contract is based on an initial rate of $48.00 per acre-foot. From time to time, the rate per acre-foot and the annual payment due the United States under Article 12(c)(1) of this contract shall be reviewed by the Contracting Officer and revised if necessary by the United States. Such review shall be in Page 89 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 6 accordance with Federal Reclamation laws and the then current municipal, industrial, and miscellaneous purposes rate policy applicable to the Columbia Basin Project. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION FEES 13. In all future contract actions, if any, including contract renewals, new contracts, contract amendments, or supplements, the Contractor shall be subject to administrative fees assessed by the United States. MEASUREMENT AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR DISTRIBUTION 14. (a) The water furnished to the Contractor shall be diverted and measured by the Contractor at a location approved by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall, at its own cost and expense, furnish and maintain any pumps, pipelines, or other facilities necessary to divert, convey, and temperature control the water made available under this contract or otherwise, and shall, at its expense, provide the necessary power. The Contractor shall obtain from the District, upon approval by the United States, a permit for any installation, facilities, and equipment on Project rights-of-way, based on plans approved in advance by the United States and subject to the United States’ inspection and approval, and shall pay the United States its reasonable charge for engineering and inspection work in connection therewith. Permits will not be issued for facilities which will provide for water diversions at excessive flow rates. Title to the headgate and other permanent water diversion facilities constructed in PP6.0 lateral shall vest in the United States as part of the transferred works of the District. The Contractor agrees, at its expense, to furnish, install, and maintain a meter or such other measuring device or procedure as may be approved by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall prepare and furnish certified monthly water use reports and related data as may Page 90 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 7 be required by the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer, or their authorized representatives, shall at all times have access to the measuring equipment or procedures for inspection purposes. Any deficiencies found therein by the Contracting Officer shall be corrected promptly by and at the expense of the Contractor. If for any reason the device or procedure fails, in the opinion of the Contracting Officer, to operate satisfactorily, the Contracting Officer shall, from the information reasonably available, estimate the quantity of water diverted under this contract, which estimate shall be accepted by the Contractor as the quantity of water for which payment shall be made. If the facilities constructed and installed by the Contractor interfere with subsequent construction, reconstruction, modification, and operation and maintenance of Project facilities, any additional cost caused by such interference shall be borne by the Contractor. The Contractor hereby agrees that in any settlement in connection with acquisition or utilization of rights-of-way needed for later construction, reconstruction, modification, and operation and maintenance of Project facilities across land covered by this contract, no enhancement in land value will be allowed as a result of this contract, including the value of improvements made thereon. (b) The United States shall not be responsible for the carriage, handling, distribution, use, disposal, or control of water taken by the Contractor under this contract, including any waste, contamination, or pollution or violation of a water quality standard under the Clean Water Act resulting from the Contractor’s use of such water, and the Contractor shall hold the United States harmless on account of damage or claim of damage of any nature whatsoever, including property damage, personal injury, or death arising out of or connected with the carriage, handling, distribution, use, disposal, or control of water taken by the Contractor under this contract, including any waste, contamination, or pollution resulting from Page 91 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 8 the Contractor’s use of such water or any liabilities from water the Contractor has failed to suitably treat before use. The Contractor also releases the United States, including its officers, employees, and contractors, from all damage which may result from the construction, reconstruction, modification, use, operation, and maintenance of the Project in connection with the Contractor’s activities under this contract, including damage to improvements which may occur as the result of seepage, flood, or erosion from irrigation works constructed by the United States or the District. (c) The Contractor agrees to use all practicable methods to ensure the economical and beneficial use of water. Water made available under this contract shall not be permitted to collect or run upon land not owned by the Contractor without proper authorization from the appropriate federal and state agencies and any affected landowners. The Contractor shall take appropriate action to avoid conditions hazardous to public health and safety, and to protect adjacent land from undesirable side effects. (d) Water provided under this contract may not be available to the Contractor during peak periods of use for irrigation of Project lands. The Contracting Officer, or if the Contracting Officer and District so agree, the District, will make the determination of availability of water with respect to the physical constraints of the delivery system and will control delivery. (e) The United States does not abandon or relinquish any waste, seepage or return flow water resulting from activities under this contract, and all such water is reserved to the United States as set forth in its repayment contract with the District. (f) Diversion and use of water under this contract shall be without expense to or obligation of the United States, regardless of fluctuation, for whatever reason. (g) The Contractor’s use of water under this contract is interruptible and subordinate to the use of Project water for the irrigation of Project lands. Page 92 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 9 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SAFE, SUITABLE, AND LAWFUL WATER 15. The Contractor recognizes that the United States has not tested or treated the water delivered under this contract. The Contractor acknowledges and agrees that it is the Contractor’s responsibility to test, monitor, and treat the water delivered under this contract. If the Contractor provides the delivered water for human consumption or domestic use, the Contractor will test, monitor, and treat the water delivered under this contract and will do so in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations and in accordance with best practices established by the latest scientific understanding. If the Contractor provides the delivered water for human consumption or domestic use, the Contractor will ensure all water that the Contractor delivers, directly or indirectly, to any person, residence, business, or other consumer will be safe and suitable for human consumption and in compliance with all applicable federal, state, tribal, and local laws. The Contractor will insert the substance of the provisions of this article into any subcontract concerning the delivery, testing, monitoring, or treatment of water, including this sentence. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS 16. The Contractor will comply with all the obligations imposed by all federal, state, tribal, and local laws applicable to the Contractor, including but not limited to the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act, and applicable federal drinking water and clean water regulations. The Contractor warrants and guarantees that no act or omission by the Contractor will cause the United States to violate or fail to comply with any applicable law. The Contractor will obtain and maintain all required permits or licenses from the appropriate federal, state, tribal, and local authorities necessary for the delivery of water by the Contractor or by the United States to the Contractor. Page 93 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 10 WATER PROVIDED AS-IS, WHERE-IS 17. The Contractor agrees and acknowledges that the delivery of water under this contract is as-is, where-is, without recourse against the United States and without warranty or guaranty, express or implied, as to its quality, character, condition, merchantability, or its fitness for any use or purpose. The Contractor agrees and acknowledges that the as-is, where-is provision of water under this contract is a discretionary function of the United States. The Contractor also agrees and acknowledges that the United States makes no representations as to the presence or lack thereof of any pollutants, contaminants, or other substances of the delivered water, and the delivered water is accepted by the Contractor with all faults. The Contractor further agrees and acknowledges that no officer, official, employee, agent, or representative of the United States is authorized to make any statement or representation regarding the quality, character, condition, merchantability, or fitness for any use or purpose of any water delivered under this contract. TITLE TO PROJECT WORKS 18. Title to all of the Columbia Basin Project, lands, and associated works shall be and remain in the United States until otherwise provided for by the Congress. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT 19. (a) This contract shall be terminated at the option of the United States at any time (1) if the Contractor is delinquent in payments required under this contract for a period of ninety (90) days, or (2) upon failure of the Contractor to comply with other provisions herein or to abide by any lawful notice, statute, order, rule, regulation, or applicable law of the State of Washington or the United States or any other lawful authority, now or hereafter established affecting water service under this contract. (b) Water service under this contract may cease, in whole or in part, if the Page 94 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 11 contract water source becomes unavailable as required by, or due to the application of, federal law, including but not limited to, the Endangered Species Act. (c) Two (2) years or more before the expiration of this contract at the end of 10 years, 20 years, 30 years, or 40 years from the date of this contract, the United States may send a notice of non-renewal to the Contractor in writing. If the United State sends any such notice of non-renewal, then this contract will not automatically renew as provided for in Article 10(a) of this contract. (d) The Contractor shall have the right to terminate this contract in the event the Contractor has no further need of the water service provided herein. Notice of the intent by the Contractor to terminate this contract shall be in writing to the Contracting Officer and the District prior to November 1 of the year preceding the year in which the termination is to occur. (e) Termination of this contract for any cause shall not relieve the Contractor of any obligation incurred by way of this contract prior to termination. (f) Upon termination of this contract for any cause, the Contractor shall, within thirty (30) days, remove its facilities from Project right-of-way except facilities to which title has vested in the United States, and restore the premises to a safe and sightly condition satisfactory to the Contracting Officer. In event of the Contractor’s failure to implement such removal, the Contracting Officer may remove the facilities and complete the restoration at the expense of the Contractor. The Contractor will promptly pay to the United States any expenses incurred from such removal and restoration. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND CONTRACT COMPLIANCE REVIEWS 20. (a) In the interest of conservation and protection of environmental resources, from time to time, this contract shall be reviewed by the Contracting Officer. The terms and Page 95 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 12 conditions of this contract may be modified, if deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer, to avoid or minimize impacts to candidate, listed, or proposed threatened and endangered species, or their designated critical habitat, or other valuable natural resources. Any modification by the Contracting Officer shall be announced by written notice to the Contractor. (b) The Contractor acknowledges the Bureau of Reclamation’s authority to conduct periodic contract compliance reviews in accordance with Federal Reclamation Law and Reclamation Manual Policy, including as currently stated in Water-Related Contract and Charges – General Principles and Requirements (PEC P05), and Reclamation Manual Directive and Standards, Contract Compliance Reviews (PEC 05-08). STANDARD PROVISIONS 21. The Standard Provisions applicable to this contract are listed below. The full text of these articles is attached as Exhibit A and is hereby made a part of this contract. a. NOTICES b. CHARGES FOR DELINQUENT PAYMENTS c. GENERAL OBLIGATION BENEFITS CONDITIONED UPON PAYMENT d. CONFIRMATION OF CONTRACT e. CONTINGENT ON APPROPRIATION OR ALLOTMENT OF FUNDS f. OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT g. CHANGES IN CONTRACTOR’S ORGANIZATION h. ASSIGNMENT LIMITED--SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS OBLIGATED i. BOOKS, RECORDS AND REPORTS j. RULES, REGULATIONS, AND DETERMINATIONS k. PROTECTION OF WATER AND AIR QUALITY l. COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS AND REGULATIONS Page 96 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 13 m. MEDIUM FOR TRANSMITTING PAYMENTS n. CONTRACT DRAFTING CONSIDERATIONS o. CONSTRAINTS ON THE AVAILABILITY OF WATER Page 97 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed their names and the day and year first above written. CITY OF PASCO By: Title: 525 N. 3rd Ave Pasco, WA 99301 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA By: Jennifer J. Carrington Regional Director Interior Region 9 – Columbia Pacific Northwest Bureau of Reclamation 1150 North Curtis Road, Suite 100 Boise, ID 83706-1234 Page 98 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 15 STATE OF ) ) ss County of ) This record was acknowledged before me on this day of , 20___ by as the designated and authorized official of the CITY OF PASCO. Notary Public (Stamp) My commission expires: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STATE OF Idaho ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on this day of , 20___ by as the designated and authorized official of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Notary Public (Stamp) My commission expires: Page 99 of 137 1 Exhibit A Contract No. 24XX160119 STANDARD PROVISIONS – COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT The Contractor, as referred to in the following Standard Provisions, shall be the CITY OF PASCO. NOTICES (a) Any notice, demand, or request authorized or required by this contract shall be deemed to have been given, (i) on behalf of the Contractor to the United States, when mailed, postage prepaid, or delivered to the Ephrata Field Office Manager, Columbia Basin Project, 32 C Street N.W., Ephrata, Washington 98823, and (ii) on behalf of the United States to the Contractor, when mailed, postage prepaid, or delivered to City of Pasco, 525 N. 3rd Ave, Pasco, WA 99301. The designation of the addressee or the address may be changed by notice given in the same manner as provided in this article for other notices. CHARGES FOR DELINQUENT PAYMENTS (b) (1) The Contractor shall be subject to interest, administrative, and penalty charges on delinquent payments. If a payment is not received by the due date, the Contractor shall pay an interest charge on the delinquent payment for each day the payment is delinquent beyond the due date. If a payment becomes 60 days delinquent, the Contractor shall pay, in addition to the interest charge, an administrative charge to cover additional costs of billing and processing the delinquent payment. If a payment is delinquent 90 days or more, the Contractor shall pay, in addition to the interest and administrative charges, a penalty charge for each day the payment is delinquent beyond the due date, based on the remaining balance of the payment due at the rate of 6 percent per year. The Contractor shall also pay any fees incurred for debt collection services associated with a delinquent payment. (2) The interest rate charged shall be the greater of either the rate prescribed quarterly in the Federal Register by the Department of the Treasury for application to overdue payments, or the interest rate of 0.5 percent per month. The interest rate charged will be determined as of the due date and remain fixed for the duration of the delinquent period. (3) When a partial payment on a delinquent account is received, the amount received shall be applied first to the penalty charges, second to the administrative charges, third to the accrued interest, and finally to the overdue payment. GENERAL OBLIGATION—BENEFITS CONDITIONED UPON PAYMENT (c) The payment of charges becoming due pursuant to this contract is a condition precedent to receiving benefits under this contract. The United States shall not make water available to the Contractor through Project facilities during any period in which the Contractor is in arrears in the advance payment of water rates or any operation and maintenance charges due the United States. Page 100 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 2 CONFIRMATION OF CONTRACT (d) Promptly after the execution of this contract, the Contractor will provide evidence to the Contracting officer that, pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington, the Contractor is a legally constituted entity and the contract is lawful, valid, and binding on the Contractor. This contract will not be binding on the United States until the Contractor provides evidence to the Contracting Officer’s satisfaction. In addition to other forms of evidence to meet the requirements of this Article, the Contractor may provide or the Contracting Officer may require a certified copy of a final decree of a court of competent jurisdiction in the State of Washington, confirming the proceedings on the part of the Contractor for the authorization of the execution of this contract. CONTINGENT ON APPROPRIATION OR ALLOTMENT OF FUNDS (e) The expenditure or advance of any money or the performance of any obligation of the United States under this contract shall be contingent upon appropriation or allotment of funds. Absence of appropriation or allotment of funds shall not relieve the Contractor from any obligations under this contract. No liability shall accrue to the United States in case funds are not appropriated or allotted. OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT (f) No Member of or Delegate to the Congress, Resident Commissioner, or official of the Contractor shall benefit from this contract other than as a water user or landowner in the same manner as other water users or landowners. CHANGES IN CONTRACTOR’S ORGANIZATION (g) While this contract is in effect, no change may be made in the Contractor’s organization which may affect the respective rights, obligations, privileges, and duties of either the United States or the Contractor under this contract including, but not limited to, dissolution, consolidation, or merger, except upon the Contracting Officer’s written consent. ASSIGNMENT LIMITED—SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS OBLIGATED (h) The provisions of this contract shall apply to and bind the successors and assigns of the parties hereto, but no assignment or transfer of this contract or any right or interest therein by either party shall be valid until approved in writing by the other party. BOOKS, RECORDS, AND REPORTS (i) The Contractor shall establish and maintain accounts and other books and records pertaining to administration of the terms and conditions of this contract, including the Contractor’s financial transactions; water supply data; project operation, maintenance, and replacement logs; project land and rights-of-way use agreements; the water users’ land-use (crop census), land-ownership, land-leasing, and water-use data; and other matters that the Contracting Page 101 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 3 Officer may require. Reports shall be furnished to the Contracting Officer in such form and on such date or dates as the Contracting Officer may require. Subject to applicable Federal laws and regulations, each party to this contract shall have the right during office hours to examine and make copies of the other party’s books and records relating to matters covered by this contract. RULES, REGULATIONS, AND DETERMINATIONS (j) (1) The parties agree that the delivery of water or the use of Federal facilities pursuant to this contract is subject to Federal reclamation law, as amended and supplemented, and the rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior under Federal reclamation law. (2) The Contracting Officer shall have the right to make determinations necessary to administer this contract that are consistent with its provisions, the laws of the United States and the State of Washington, and the rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior. Such determinations shall be made in consultation with the Contractor. PROTECTION OF WATER AND AIR QUALITY (k) (1) The United States does not warrant or guarantee the quality of the water delivered to the Contractor and are under no obligation to furnish or construct water treatment facilities to maintain or improve the quality of water delivered to the Contractor. The Contractor assumes any and all risks associated with use of the M&I water for lawn and landscape maintenance and shall hold the United States harmless against any and all claim of damage of any nature whatsoever related to the quality of water provided hereunder. (2) The Contractor shall comply with all applicable water and air pollution laws and regulations of the United States and the State of Washington; and shall obtain all required permits or licenses from the appropriate Federal, State, or local authorities necessary for the delivery of water by the Contractor; and shall be responsible for compliance with all Federal, State, and local water quality standards applicable to surface and subsurface drainage and/or discharges generated through the use of Federal or Contractor facilities or project water provided by the Contractor within the Contractor’s Project Water Service Area. (3) This article shall not affect or alter any legal obligations of the Secretary to provide drainage or other discharge services. COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS AND REGULATIONS (l) (1) The Contractor shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-352; 42 U.S.C. § 2000d), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-112, Title V, as amended; 29 U.S.C. § 791, et seq.), the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (Pub. L. 94-135, Title III; 42 U.S.C. § 6101, et seq.), Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-336; 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq.), Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-336; 42 U.S.C. § 12181, et seq.), and any other applicable civil rights laws, and with the applicable implementing regulations and any guidelines imposed by the U.S. Department of the Interior and/or Bureau of Reclamation. Page 102 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 4 (2) These statutes prohibit any person in the United States from being excluded from participation in, being denied the benefits of, or being otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving financial assistance from the Bureau of Reclamation on the grounds of race, color, national origin, disability, or age. By executing this contract, the Contractor agrees to immediately take any measures necessary to implement this obligation, including permitting officials of the United States to inspect premises, programs, and documents. (3) The Contractor makes this agreement in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, loans, contracts, property discounts, or other Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the Contractor by the Bureau of Reclamation, including installment payments after such date on account of arrangements for Federal financial assistance which were approved before such date. The Contractor recognizes and agrees that such Federal assistance will be extended in reliance on the representations and agreements made in this article and that the United States reserves the right to seek judicial enforcement thereof. (4) Complaints of discrimination against the Contractor shall be investigated by the Contracting Officer’s Office of Civil Rights. MEDIUM FOR TRANSMITTING PAYMENTS (m) (1) All payments from the Contractor to the United States under this contract shall be by the medium requested by the United States on or before the date payment is due. The required method of payment may include checks, wire transfers, or other types of payment specified by the United States. (2) Upon execution of the contract, the Contractor shall furnish the Contracting Officer with the Contractor’s taxpayer’s identification number (TIN). The purpose for requiring the Contractor’s TIN is for collecting and reporting any delinquent amounts arising out of the Contractor’s relationship with the United States. CONTRACT DRAFTING CONSIDERATIONS (n) This Contract has been, negotiated and reviewed by the parties hereto, each of whom is sophisticated in the matters to which this Contract pertains. Articles 1 through 20 of this Contract have been drafted, negotiated, and reviewed by the parties, and no one party shall be considered to have drafted the stated articles. CONSTRAINTS ON THE AVAILABILITY OF WATER (o) (a) In its operation of the Project, the Contracting Officer will use all reasonable means to guard against a condition of shortage in the quantity of water to be made available to the Contractor pursuant to this Contract. In the event the Contracting Officer determines that a condition of shortage appears probable, the Contracting Officer will notify the Contractor of said determination as soon as practicable. (b) If there is a condition of shortage because of errors in physical operations of the Page 103 of 137 Contract No. 24XX160119 5 Project, drought, other physical causes beyond the control of the Contracting Officer, or actions taken by the Contracting Officer to meet current and future legal obligations, then no liability shall accrue against the United States or any of its officers, agents, employees, or contractors for any damage, direct or indirect, arising therefrom. Page 104 of 137 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 14, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 4/21/25 FROM: Maria Serra, Director Public Works SUBJECT: 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program (15 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Draft 2026-2031 Project List Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: As part of the City’s effort to provide for the proper and necessary development of a functional transportation network, the City shall, as required by State law (RCW 35.77.010), develop and adopt annually a Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (Six-Year TIP) with such program acting as a guide for the coordinated development of the City's transportation system. The Six-Year TIP of the City specifically sets forth those projects and programs of both City and regional significance that benefit the transportation system and promote public safety and efficient multi-modal movement. Projects in the TIP are selected from master plans such as the Transportation System Master Plan, Broadmoor Master Plan, Downtown Pasco Master Plan, and through identified are they Safety Plan. Road Local Additionally, community engagement, stakeholder coordination (e.g., with the Pasco School District and for Safe Routes to School improvements), and operational maintenance needs identified by City Departments. Page 105 of 137 Development of the 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program will be led by Public Works Department, and informed by the City Council, the public, and other city staff and departments. Update of the TIP and subsequent submission to the State are statutory requirements, and while the program is not required to be fiscally constrained, the program should be practical and feasible. The Council will see many of these projects again, incorporated with the annual Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan later this year. V. DISCUSSION: The proposed TIP project list encompasses 41 projects, 3 programs and 5 studies (49 items in total). This list excludes the projects previously included in TIP anticipated to be completed by the end of 2025. For example: Sandifur Parkway and Broadmoor Blvd. Improvements and Sandifur-Road 108 extension projects. The proposed list incorporates newly identified projects and plans. For example: North 4th Avenue Pavement Preservation, South Road 68 Pavement preservation and Road 68/Taylor Flats Intersection Study (in bold). Special attention was put forth to accurately represent projects that are funded with Federal and State dollars. Projects that have received funding in the last year have been updated to reflect their funding status. As a reminder, this plan is focused on projects that are anticipated to be delivered by the City, if funding is secured. Per State statute, the updated TIP must be adopted by July 1st and then submitted to the Washington State Secretary of Transportation within 30 days of adoption. The plan/program may at any time be revised by a majority of the City Council, but only after a public hearing. Public Outreach Two public open house events are scheduled. April 21, 2025 5.30-6.30 PM at City Hall and Wednesday May 7th, 11.30AM to 1.30PM at GESA stadium. In the events, staff will solicit community input, feedback, and ideas on projects. Online platform for submission of comments is available for the general public. A public hearing is tentatively planned for May 27, 2025. Next Steps During this process, staff will seek guidance from City Council to ensure the TIP is in alignment with the Council's Transportation priorities. Workshops and public hearings are scheduled during the next 2 months, for staff to gather Page 106 of 137 feedback from both the Council and the public. This input will be incorporated into a draft project list for the Six-Year TIP. Adoption of the 2026-2031 TIP is tentatively scheduled for June 16, 2025. Page 107 of 137 PRELIMINARY 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Plan DRAFT 04/16/2025 Column1 Project Title Road Name Begin/End Termini PE ROW CONST Total Ranked Funding Type PROJECTS 1 Lewis Street Underpass Demolition Lewis Street 1st Ave to Tacoma Ave 500,000$ 2,800,000$ 3,300,000$ 1 Planned Grant 2 Rd 40 E Extension Road 40 East 'A' Street/ East Lewis Place 80,000$ 380,000$ 1,468,000$ 1,928,000$ 1 Local Funds 3 Ainsworth Ave Pavement Preservation Ainsworth Ave Oregon Ave/10th ave 440,000$ 250,000$ 1,442,000$ 2,132,000$ 1 Secured Grant/Local Funds 4 Sylvester St Overpass Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Sylvester Street US 395 Overpass 1,000,000$ 3,229,340$ 4,229,340$ 1 Secured Grant 5 Lewis Street Pavement Preservation Lewis Street US12/27th Ave 440,000$ 250,000$ 4,556,000$ 5,246,000$ 1 Secured Grant/Local Funds 6 Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 76 Intersection Safety Enhancements Sandifur Parkway Road 76 371,000$ 1,660,000$ 2,031,000$ 1 Secured Grant 7 Clark St Improvements Clark Street 10th St/2nd St 350,000$ 1,450,000$ 1,800,000$ 1 Planned Grant 8 Burns Rd/Rd 68 Intersection Improvements Burns Road Rd 68 450,000$ 200,000$ 1,350,000$ 2,000,000$ 1 Planned Grant/Local Funds 9 Harris Rd Realignment Rd 103 Sandifur Pkwy 250,000$ 1,650,000$ 1,900,000$ 1 Local Funds 10 Burns Rd Extension - Missing link Burns Road Road 68/Rio Grande Lane 600,000$ 1,250,000$ 4,150,000$ 6,000,000$ 1 Local Funds/Private contributions 11 City Wide Traffic Signal Improvements (Phase 3) Multiple Locations Multiple Locations 300,000$ 2,877,500$ 3,177,500$ 1 Planned Grant 12 N 4th Ave Pavement Preservation (I-182 to County Line)I-182 County Line (Glade Rd) 150,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,750,000$ 2 Planned Grant/Local Match 13 Burden Blvd/Rd 60 Intersection Improvements Burden Road Road 60 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000$ 2 Local funds (TIF Impact) 14 Lewis St/Heritage Blvd Intersection Improvements Lewis Street Heritage Blvd 400,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,400,000$ 2 Local Funds/Private Contributions 15 South Rd 68 Pavement Preservation Court St I-182 350,000$ 350,000$ 1,500,000$ 2,200,000$ 2 Planned Grant/Local Funds 16 Rd 76 Overpass Road 76 Chapel Hill/Burden Blvd 3,580,000$ 2,604,000$ 24,575,000$ 30,759,000$ 2 Planned grant /Private Contributions/Local Funds 17 South 4th Ave (Festival Street Improvements) S 4th Avenue Lewis Street / Columbia Street 290,000$ 790,000$ 1,080,000$ 2 Planned Grant 18 Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 84 Intersection Improvements Sandifur Parkway Road 84 350,000$ 1,900,000$ 2,250,000$ 2 Planned Grant/Private Contributions 19 Sacajawea Heritage Trail Levee Lowering Sacajawea Heritage Trail Road 54/Road 72 250,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,250,000$ 2 Planned Grant 20 Court & Rd 100 Intersection Improvements Court St Rd 100 500,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,500,000$ 6,000,000$ 2 Local Funds 21 Court Street/Road 60 Intersection Improvements Court St Rd 60 450,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,950,000$ 2 Planned Grant 22 Sandifur Pkwy/Convention Dr Intersection Improvements Sandifur Parkway Convention Dr 410,000$ 1,900,000$ 2,310,000$ 2 Local Funds/private contributions 23 I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Multiuse Pathway/Bridge Broadmoor Boulevard I-182 1,500,000$ 8,000,000$ 9,500,000$ 3 Planned Grant/Local Funds 24 Columbia St Improvements Columbia Street 10th St/2nd St 390,000$ 1,190,000$ 1,580,000$ 3 Planned Grant 25 Burden Rd/Rd 44 Intersection Improvements Burden Road Road 44 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000$ 3 Local funds (TIF Impact) 26 Rd 40 East Pathway Road 40 East Sacajawea Park/East Lewis Place 440,000$ 690,000$ 840,000$ 1,970,000$ 3 Planned Grant 27 Rainier Ave/Kartchner St Intersection Improvements Rainier Ave Kartchner 400,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,400,000$ 3 Local Funds/Private contributions 28 Court St Improvements- Ped/Bike Court Street Road 96/Harris Road 1,480,000$ 5,800,000$ 7,280,000$ 3 Planned Grant 29 Rd 76 Improvements - Sandifur Pkwy to Cordero Dr Wrigley Drive Road 76 300,000$ 1,700,000$ 2,000,000$ 3 Local Funds 30 Argent Rd Widening (Phase 4) Argent Road Road 36/Road 44 1,180,000$ 4,720,000$ 5,900,000$ 4 Planned Grant/local funds 31 Franklin County Irrigation District Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway N/A Road 100/Road 76 300,000$ 1,800,000$ 2,000,000$ 4,100,000$ 4 Planned Grant 32 Rd 100 Widening Road 100 Court St/Chapel Hill Blvd 825,000$ 750,000$ 7,000,000$ 8,575,000$ 4 Planned Grant 33 Shoreline Rd Realignment Shoreline Road Court/Burns Road 500,000$ 2,500,000$ 7,500,000$ 10,500,000$ 4 Planned Grant 34 Burns Rd Extension to Glade Rd Burns Road "Road 44"/N Glade Road 4,800,000$ 4,000,000$ 19,200,000$ 28,000,000$ 4 Planned Grant 35 Burden Rd/Madison Ave Intersection Improvements Burden Road Madison Ave 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000$ 5 Local funds (TIF Impact) 36 Court St Safety Improvements Court Street Road 40/Road 68 110,000$ 340,000$ 450,000$ 5 Planned Grant 37 James St Improvements James Street Oregon Ave/Frontier Lp 250,000$ 1,700,000$ 1,950,000$ 5 Local Funds 38 Harris Rd / Crescent Rd Overpass Harris Road Harris Road/Crescent Rd 4,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 45,000,000$ 54,000,000$ 5 Planned grant /Private contributions/local funds 39 Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 1) Lewis Street 2nd Ave/ 5th Ave 880,000$ 4,800,000$ 5,680,000$ 5 Planned Grant/Local 40 Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 2) Lewis Street 5th Ave/10th Ave 640,000$ 4,460,000$ 5,100,000$ 5 Planned Grant/Local 41 I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Improvements - Westbound Broadmoor Boulevard I-182 750,000$ 8,000,000$ 8,750,000$ 5 Planned Grant/local match PROGRAMS 42 Annual Pavement Preservation Multiple Locations Multiple Locations -$ 1 Local funds 43 Ped/Bike Gap Program Multiple Locations Multiple Locations -$ 2 Local funds 44 Neighborhood Traffic Calming program Multiple Locations Multiple Locations -$ 2 Local funds PLANS AND STUDIES 45 Comprehensive Safety Action Plan(SS4A)400,000$ 400,000$ 1 Secured Grant/local match 46 Traffic Analysis for US 12 US 12 A /Tank Farm Road 3,060,000$ 3,060,000$ 1 Planned Grant 47 Interchange Feasibility Study on I-182 I-182 Multiple Existing Interchanges 450,000$ 450,000$ 2 Local Funds 48 Rd 68/Taylor Flats Rd Intersection Study Road 68 Taylor Flats Rd/Columbia River 350,000$ 350,000$ 3 Local Funds 49 Sign Reflectivity Analysis and Implementation 112,000$ 400,000$ 512,000$ 4 Planned Grant 257,709,840$ Pa g e 1 0 8 o f 1 3 7 PRELIMINARY 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Plan DRAFT 04/16/2025 DRAFT 04/16/2025 Column1 Project Title Road Name Begin/End Termini PE ROW CONST Total Ranked Funding Type Prior Year 2026 Year 2027 Year 2028 Year 2029 Year 2030 Year 2031 REMAINDER 6 year- plan PROJECTS - 1 Lewis Street Underpass Demolition Lewis Street 1st Ave to Tacoma Ave 500,000$ 2,800,000$ 3,300,000$ 1 Planned Grant 500,000$ 2,800,000$ 2,800,000 2 Rd 40 E Extension Road 40 East 'A' Street/ East Lewis Place 80,000$ 380,000$ 1,468,000$ 1,928,000$ 1 Local Funds 400,000$ 528,000$ 1,400,000$ 1,928,000 3 Ainsworth Ave Pavement Preservation Ainsworth Ave Oregon Ave/10th ave 440,000$ 250,000$ 1,442,000$ 2,132,000$ 1 Secured Grant/Local Funds 400,000$ 1,682,000$ 1,682,000 4 Sylvester St Overpass Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Sylvester Street US 395 Overpass 1,000,000$ 3,229,340$ 4,229,340$ 1 Secured Grant 340,660$ 659,340$ 3,229,340$ 3,888,680 5 Lewis Street Pavement Preservation Lewis Street US12/27th Ave 440,000$ 250,000$ 4,556,000$ 5,246,000$ 1 Secured Grant/Local Funds 100,000$ 996,000$ 4,000,000$ 4,996,000 6 Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 76 Intersection Safety Enhancements Sandifur Parkway Road 76 371,000$ 1,660,000$ 2,031,000$ 1 Secured Grant 50,000$ 300,000$ 1,750,000$ 2,050,000 7 Clark St Improvements Clark Street 10th St/2nd St 350,000$ 1,450,000$ 1,800,000$ 1 Planned Grant 50,000$ 300,000$ 1,450,000$ 1,750,000 8 Burns Rd/Rd 68 Intersection Improvements Burns Road Rd 68 450,000$ 200,000$ 1,350,000$ 2,000,000$ 1 Planned Grant/Local Funds 150,000$ 350,000$ 1,500,000$ 2,000,000 9 Harris Rd Realignment Rd 103 Sandifur Pkwy 250,000$ 1,650,000$ 1,900,000$ 1 Local Funds 250,000$ 1,650,000$ 1,900,000 10 Burns Rd Extension - Missing link Burns Road Road 68/Rio Grande Lane 600,000$ 1,250,000$ 4,150,000$ 6,000,000$ 1 Local Funds/Private contributions 300,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,700,000$ 6,000,000 11 City Wide Traffic Signal Improvements (Phase 3) Multiple Locations Multiple Locations 300,000$ 2,877,500$ 3,177,500$ 1 Planned Grant 300,000$ 2,877,500$ 3,177,500 12 N 4th Ave Pavement Preservation (I-182 to County Line) I-182 County Line (Glade Rd) 150,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,750,000$ 2 Planned Grant/Local Match 150,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,750,000 13 Burden Blvd/Rd 60 Intersection Improvements Burden Road Road 60 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000$ 2 Local funds (TIF Impact) 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000 14 Lewis St/Heritage Blvd Intersection Improvements Lewis Street Heritage Blvd 400,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,400,000$ 2 Local Funds/Private Contributions 400,000$ 1,500,000$ 500,000$ 2,400,000 15 South Rd 68 Pavement Preservation Court St I-182 350,000$ 350,000$ 1,500,000$ 2,200,000$ 2 Planned Grant/Local Funds 700,000$ 1,500,000$ 2,200,000 16 Rd 76 Overpass Road 76 Chapel Hill/Burden Blvd 3,580,000$ 2,604,000$ 24,575,000$ 30,759,000$ 2 Planned grant /Private Contributions/Local Funds 2,659,000$ 3,100,000$ 8,000,000$ 12,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 30,759,000 17 South 4th Ave (Festival Street Improvements) S 4th Avenue Lewis Street / Columbia Street 290,000$ 790,000$ 1,080,000$ 2 Planned Grant 290,000$ 790,000$ 1,080,000 18 Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 84 Intersection Improvements Sandifur Parkway Road 84 350,000$ 1,900,000$ 2,250,000$ 2 Planned Grant/Private Contributions 350,000$ 1,900,000$ 2,250,000 19 Sacajawea Heritage Trail Levee Lowering Sacajawea Heritage Trail Road 54/Road 72 250,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,250,000$ 2 Planned Grant 250,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ 3,250,000 20 Court & Rd 100 Intersection Improvements Court St Rd 100 500,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,500,000$ 6,000,000$ 2 Local Funds 500,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,500,000$ 6,000,000 21 Court Street/Road 60 Intersection Improvements Court St Rd 60 450,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,950,000$ 2 Planned Grant 450,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,950,000 22 Sandifur Pkwy/Convention Dr Intersection Improvements Sandifur Parkway Convention Dr 410,000$ 1,900,000$ 2,310,000$ 2 Local Funds/private contributions 410,000$ 1,900,000$ 2,310,000 23 I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Multiuse Pathway/Bridge Broadmoor Boulevard I-182 1,500,000$ 8,000,000$ 9,500,000$ 3 Planned Grant/Local Funds 500,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 9,500,000 24 Columbia St Improvements Columbia Street 10th St/2nd St 390,000$ 1,190,000$ 1,580,000$ 3 Planned Grant 390,000$ 1,190,000$ 1,580,000 25 Burden Rd/Rd 44 Intersection Improvements Burden Road Road 44 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000$ 3 Local funds (TIF Impact)360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000 26 Rd 40 East Pathway Road 40 East Sacajawea Park/East Lewis Place 440,000$ 690,000$ 840,000$ 1,970,000$ 3 Planned Grant 540,000$ 590,000$ 840,000$ 1,970,000 27 Rainier Ave/Kartchner St Intersection Improvements Rainier Ave Kartchner 400,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,400,000$ 3 Local Funds/Private contributions 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,500,000$ 500,000$ 2,400,000 28 Court St Improvements- Ped/Bike Court Street Road 96/Harris Road 1,480,000$ 5,800,000$ 7,280,000$ 3 Planned Grant 180,000$ 1,340,000$ 3,456,000$ 2,304,000$ 7,280,000 29 Rd 76 Improvements - Sandifur Pkwy to Cordero Dr Wrigley Drive Road 76 300,000$ 1,700,000$ 2,000,000$ 3 Local Funds 300,000$ 1,700,000$ 2,000,000 30 Argent Rd Widening (Phase 4) Argent Road Road 36/Road 44 1,180,000$ 4,720,000$ 5,900,000$ 4 Planned Grant/local funds 1,180,000$ 2,360,000$ 2,360,000$ 5,900,000 31 Franklin County Irrigation District Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway N/A Road 100/Road 76 300,000$ 1,800,000$ 2,000,000$ 4,100,000$ 4 Planned Grant 300,000$ 500,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,800,000 32 Rd 100 Widening Road 100 Court St/Chapel Hill Blvd 825,000$ 750,000$ 7,000,000$ 8,575,000$ 4 Planned Grant 625,000$ 950,000$ 7,000,000$ 8,575,000 33 Shoreline Rd Realignment Shoreline Road Court/Burns Road 500,000$ 2,500,000$ 7,500,000$ 10,500,000$ 4 Planned Grant 250,000$ 2,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 7,700,000$ 3,250,000 34 Burns Rd Extension to Glade Rd Burns Road "Road 44"/N Glade Road 4,800,000$ 4,000,000$ 19,200,000$ 28,000,000$ 4 Planned Grant 2,400,000$ 3,400,000$ 3,000,000$ 24,750,000$ 8,800,000 35 Burden Rd/Madison Ave Intersection Improvements Burden Road Madison Ave 360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000$ 5 Local funds (TIF Impact)360,000$ 1,810,000$ 2,170,000 36 Court St Safety Improvements Court Street Road 40/Road 68 110,000$ 340,000$ 450,000$ 5 Planned Grant 110,000$ 340,000$ 450,000 37 James St Improvements James Street Oregon Ave/Frontier Lp 250,000$ 1,700,000$ 1,950,000$ 5 Local Funds 250,000$ 1,700,000$ 1,950,000 38 Harris Rd / Crescent Rd Overpass Harris Road Harris Road/Crescent Rd 4,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 45,000,000$ 54,000,000$ 5 Planned grant /Private contributions/local funds 1,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 47,600,000$ 4,000,000 39 Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 1) Lewis Street 2nd Ave/ 5th Ave 880,000$ 4,800,000$ 5,680,000$ 5 Planned Grant/Local 530,000$ 450,000$ 780,000$ 4,000,000$ 1,230,000 40 Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 2) Lewis Street 5th Ave/10th Ave 640,000$ 4,460,000$ 5,100,000$ 5 Planned Grant/Local 300,000$ 4,800,000$ 300,000 41 I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Improvements - Westbound Broadmoor Boulevard I-182 750,000$ 8,000,000$ 8,750,000$ 5 Planned Grant/local match 750,000$ 6,940,000$ 750,000 PROGRAMS - 42 Annual Pavement Preservation Multiple Locations Multiple Locations -$ 1 Local funds 1,102,400$ 1,146,496$ 1,192,356$ 1,240,050$ 1,289,652$ 1,341,238$ 7,312,192 43 Ped/Bike Gap Program Multiple Locations Multiple Locations -$ 2 Local funds 105,000$ 110,250$ 115,763$ 121,551$ 127,628$ 580,191 44 Neighborhood Traffic Calming program Multiple Locations Multiple Locations -$ 2 Local funds 110,250$ 115,763$ 121,551$ 127,628$ 134,010$ 609,201 PLANS AND STUDIES - 45 Comprehensive Safety Action Plan(SS4A)400,000$ 400,000$ 1 Secured Grant/local match 250,000$ 150,000$ 150,000 46 Traffic Analysis for US 12 US 12 A /Tank Farm Road 3,060,000$ 3,060,000$ 1 Planned Grant 1,530,000$ 1,530,000$ 3,060,000 47 Interchange Feasibility Study on I-182 I-182 Multiple Existing Interchanges 450,000$ 450,000$ 2 Local Funds 200,000$ 250,000$ 450,000 48 Rd 68/Taylor Flats Rd Intersection Study Road 68 Taylor Flats Rd/Columbia River 350,000$ 350,000$ 3 Local Funds 350,000$ 350,000 49 Sign Reflectivity Analysis and Implementation 112,000$ 400,000$ 512,000$ 4 Planned Grant 112,000$ 400,000$ 512,000 - 257,709,840$ 15,316,740$ 32,670,586$ 29,178,368$ 32,062,363$ 27,714,831$ 32,446,876$ 169,389,764 Pa g e 1 0 9 o f 1 3 7 April 21, 2025 Pasco City Council Workshop Pa g e 1 1 0 o f 1 3 7 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program April 21 2025 Pasco City Council Pa g e 1 1 1 o f 1 3 7 RCW 35.77.010 – Prepare a comprehensive transportation plan for the ensuing six years that is: • Consistent with comprehensive plans • Includes bicycle and pedestrian facilities • Deadline: July 1, 2025 • Filed with the secretary of transportation within 30 days of adoption 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program 3 Pa g e 1 1 2 o f 1 3 7 TIP identifies: •Proposed name and brief scope •Proposed Schedule •Estimated cost per project (per phase) •Design •Right-of-Way •Construction •Funding sources Th TIP ill f j t ti i t d 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program 4 Pa g e 1 1 3 o f 1 3 7 Preliminary 2026-2031 TIP Project List 41 Projects; 3 Programs; 5 Studies WORK DONE: •Identified completed projects and removed them •Updated project funding, cost, or schedule •Incorporate new projects STILL TO DO: •Complete outreach and incorporation of feedback •Confirm prioritization 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program 5 Pa g e 1 1 4 o f 1 3 7 6 Pa g e 1 1 5 o f 1 3 7 7 Pa g e 1 1 6 o f 1 3 7 Next Steps • Present draft 2026-2031 TIP April • Outreach April/May • Update to Council on feedback May • Potential edits to TIP May • Public Hearing May 27 • Potential edits to TIP June • Adoption by July 2025 June 16 2026-2031 Transportation Improvement Program 8 Pa g e 1 1 7 o f 1 3 7 Questions?Pa g e 1 1 8 o f 1 3 7 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 14, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 4/21/25 FROM: Maria Serra, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Plan Update (10 minute staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Presentation Brochure: Understanding the Importance of CIP preparation Process Preliminary Capital Improvement Plan Worksheets II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a long-term, strategic planning tool that outlines major infrastructure projects over a multi-year period—typically six years for the City of Pasco. It includes initiatives such as constructing and maintaining public buildings, parks, roads, and utility systems (Water, Sewer, PWRF, Irrigation and storm). The CIP supports the City in managing resources effectively, fiscally transparent, ensuring critical needs, prioritizing and responsible development. While the CIP outlines proposed expenditures and serves as a guide for future budgeting decisions, it does not allocate actual funding or include detailed project designs. It is reviewed and updated annually to reflect evolving priorities and conditions. The CIP is shaped by several key inputs, including masterplans, operational assessments, with community feedback, and partnerships outside organizations. These sources help identify and prioritize projects that align with city goals and community needs. Funding comes from a variety of sources Page 119 of 137 such as grants, municipal bonds, utility revenues, impact fees, and public- private Transportation with integrated also the CIP The partnerships. is Improvement Plan (TIP) to coordinate transportation-related projects. V. DISCUSSION: Since the introduction of this item in March 2025, staff has reviewed the previously approved CIP and eliminated completed projects, updated funding status, cost and schedules for existing projects, as well as identified new projects. in to subject and nature preliminary are item this in included lists The adjustment. Transportation list is purposely omitted, to allow for the TIP process to be completed and then incorporated into this plan. This approach will ensure consistency between documents. Public Outreach Two public open house events are scheduled. April 21, 2025 5:30 PM to 6:30 PM at City Hall and Wednesday May 7, 2025, 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM at GESA stadium. In the events, staff will solicit community input, feedback, and ideas on projects. Online platform for submission of comments is available for the general public. Next Steps During this process, staff will seek guidance from City Council to ensure the CIP reflects Council's priorities. Workshops are anticipated to take place for frequent updates to council and refinement of the list and its prioritization. As discussed in 2024, the City’s utility systems face significant capital needs, and the development of the 2026–2031 CIP is aligned with a cost of service analysis to determine necessary revenue adjustments for long-term financial stability, includes This utilities. Sewer specially Water in reviewing and connection fees and utility rates. Adoption of CIP is expected in the fall of 2025. Page 120 of 137 April 21, 2025 Pasco City Council Workshop Pa g e 1 2 1 o f 1 3 7 2026-2031 Capital Improvement Plan April 21, 2025 Pasco City Council Pa g e 1 2 2 o f 1 3 7 •Long-term, strategic planning tool that outlines major infrastructure projects over a multi -year period (6 years) •Encompasses major infrastructure projects in: •Water •Sewer •PWRF •Irrigation •Stormwater •Transportation (excluded from this presentation) •Parks and Facilities What is a Capital Improvement Plan 3 Pa g e 1 2 3 o f 1 3 7 •Community Input •Master Plans •External Partnerships •Building and Facilities Needs •Funding Available Factors in CIP Development 4 Pa g e 1 2 4 o f 1 3 7 Next Steps •April: Present draft 2026-2031 CIP •April/May: Outreach Events •May: Update to Council on feedback gathered •May: Comprehensive TIP Proposal •June: TIP Adoption (previous item) •June: Water/Sewer Rate Study Report •July: Water/Sewer Rate Updates Outreach •August: Water/Sewer Rate Adoption •September: Comprehensive CIP Proposal •October: Potential CIP Edits •November: CIP Adoption 2026-2031 Capital Improvement Plan 5 Pa g e 1 2 5 o f 1 3 7 6 Pa g e 1 2 6 o f 1 3 7 7 Pa g e 1 2 7 o f 1 3 7 8 Pa g e 1 2 8 o f 1 3 7 Questions?Pa g e 1 2 9 o f 1 3 7 1 Understanding the Capital Improvement Plan Preparation Process What is a Capital Improvement Plan? A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a comprehensive, strategic plan that outlines proposed capital projects over a multi-year period, typically five to ten years. City of Pasco's CIP is a 6-year plan that is updated annually. The CIP encompasses major infrastructure projects such as the construction and maintenance of public buildings, parks, streets, and water/sewer systems. It serves as a planning tool that helps the City manage and prioritize capital projects, ensuring that critical infrastructure is developed and maintained in a systematic and fiscally responsible manner. Importance of a CIP: • Strategic Planning: Helps the City identify and prioritize needs, allowing for strategic allocation of resources. • Fiscal Responsibility: Promotes disciplined budgeting and financial planning, aiding in the avoidance of unnecessary debt. • Transparency and Accountability: Provides a clear roadmap for stakeholders, including residents, businesses, and government officials, fostering trust through transparent governance. • Coordination: Ensures coordination among various City departments and aligns with broader city goals and objectives. What a CIP is Not Understanding what a CIP is not is equally important: • Not a Budget: While the CIP outlines planned expenditures, it does not allocate funds. Actual funding decisions are made through the City’s biennial budgeting process. • Not Static: The CIP is a dynamic document, subject to revisions based on changing priorities, unforeseen circumstances, and financial realities. • Not a Detailed Project Plan: The CIP provides a high-level overview of projects, not detailed project specifications or designs. Factors in CIP Development The development of the CIP involves various critical factors to ensure comprehensive planning and alignment with community and City Council's goals and workplan. These factors include: Page 130 of 137 2 Masterplans and Comprehensive System Plan Projects are often identified from long range planning documents (typically 20-year horizon) and areas masterplans. These plans are for example, Comprehensive Water System plan, Transportation System Masterplan, Broadmoor Area Masterplan, Downtown Masterplan, Parks masterplan, etc. Projects identified in these plans are considered for incorporation into the 6-year CIP. Needs identified through operational deficiencies Assessment Evaluating the condition and needs of public infrastructure, buildings and facilities to prioritize maintenance, upgrades, and new construction projects. This ensures the City’s infrastructure supports effective service delivery. Community Input Listening Sessions: Conducting listening sessions with residents to gather their input and feedback on priority projects and community needs. These sessions provide a platform for direct community engagement and ensure that the CIP reflects the voices of our residents. External Partnerships Collaborations: Working with regional and state agencies, non-profits, and private sector partners to leverage resources, expertise, and funding for capital projects. Partnerships can enhance the scope and impact of the CIP. Funding The successful implementation of the CIP relies on securing diverse funding sources to support the planned projects. The primary funding sources include: • General Fund: Allocations from the City’s general operating budget. • Grants: State, federal, and private grants designated for specific types of infrastructure projects. • Bonds: Issuance of municipal bonds to raise capital for large-scale projects, repaid over time through tax revenues or other City income. • Impact Fees: Fees collected from developers to fund infrastructure improvements necessitated by new development. • Utility Revenues: Funds generated from water, sewer, and stormwater utility fees dedicated to maintaining and upgrading utility infrastructure. Page 131 of 137 3 • Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborative agreements with private sector entities to finance and develop specific projects. • Special Assessments: Additional charges levied on properties that benefit directly from specific infrastructure improvements. • Local Improvement Districts (LIDs): Areas where property owners agree to fund infrastructure improvements through additional property taxes or assessments. Integration with the Transportation Improvement Plan The CIP is closely integrated with the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), which specifically focuses on transportation-related infrastructure projects. The TIP includes projects such as road improvements and pedestrian/bicycle facilities. Key points of integration include: • Coordination of Projects: Transportation projects in the TIP are incorporated into the broader CIP to ensure cohesive planning and efficient use of resources. • Prioritization and Funding: Transportation projects are evaluated alongside other capital projects to determine priorities and funding allocation within the overall CIP framework. • Consistency with Strategic Goals: Both the TIP and CIP align with the city’s strategic goals, ensuring transportation projects support broader economic development, sustainability, and community livability objectives. Role of the CIP in the Biennial Budgeting Process The CIP plays a crucial role in the City’s biennial budgeting process by providing a foundation for capital expenditure decisions. Here’s how the CIP is utilized: • Budget Formulation: The CIP informs the development of the capital budget by identifying projects that require funding in the upcoming budget cycle. • Funding Allocation: Projects listed in the CIP are evaluated based on priority, feasibility, and available funding, guiding the allocation of resources in the biennial budget. • Financial Planning: The CIP helps in forecasting long-term financial needs and obligations, facilitating prudent financial management and debt planning. • Monitoring and Accountability: Once the biennial budget is approved, the CIP serves as a reference for tracking the progress and implementation of capital projects, ensuring accountability and adherence to planned timelines and budgets. Page 132 of 137 PRELIMINARY 2026-2031 CIP WORKSHEET 6-year Capital Plan Total (EXCLUDES 2025) FY 2026 Capital Costs FY 2027 Capital Costs FY 2028 Capital Costs FY 2029 Capital Costs FY 2030 Capital Costs FY 2031 Capital Costs SANITARY SEWER 1 9th & WA Lift Station Improvements 500,000 500,000 - - - - - 2 Maitland Lift Station Improvements 500,000 500,000 3 Annual Sewer Upsizing Program 2,760,190 416,000 432,640 449,946 468,943 486,661 506,000 4 CSP #14 - Court St Sewer Main Upsize - Rd 100 to Rd 110 4,818,000 - 318,000 4,500,000 - - 5 CSP #15 - Court St Sewer Main Upsize - Rd 97 to Rd 88 3,730,000 - 730,000 3,000,000 - - 6 CSP #17 - USACE Easement Sewer Main Upsize - Rd 72 to Rd 60 4,125,000 2,325,000 1,800,000 - - - - 7 CSP #18 - Sylvester St Sewer Upsize - Rd 60 to 44 6,400,000 - - - - 800,000 5,600,000 8 CSP #20 - USACE Easement Sewer Main Upsize -Rd 36 West of US 395 2,725,000 1,525,000 1,200,000 - - - - 9 CSP #21 - USACE Easement Sewer Main Upsize - Rd 28 to US 395 1,425,000 1,125,000 300,000 - - - - 10 CSP #23 - Washington St Sewer Upsize - 15th Ave to 9th & Washington Lift Station 3,050,000 - - - 450,000 2,600,000 11 Riverview West Sewer Lift Station 1,865,000 365,000 1,500,000 - - - 12 Road 68 Lift Station 2,000,000 - 500,000 1,500,000 - - 13 Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements Phase 2 500,055 500,055 - - - - - 14 Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements Phase 3 3,850,000 - - - - 750,000 3,100,000 15 Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements Phase 4 7,500,000 - - - - 1,000,000 6,500,000 45,748,245 6,891,055 4,597,640 4,497,946 8,418,943 5,636,661 15,706,000 WATER 1 Alton Street Water Main Extension - Wehe Ave to Alley East of Owen Ave 492,000 - - - - 67,000 425,000 2 BWTP Project 1 - Electrical Building 7,397,000 2,479,000 2,479,000 2,439,000 - - - 3 BWTP Project 3 - Raw Water Pump Station 5,881,000 3,636,000 2,245,000 - - - - 4 BWTP Project 5 - Chemical Building 19,610,000 310,000 3,725,000 7,525,000 5,275,000 1,775,000 1,000,000 5 BWTP Project 6 - Filters 20,450,000 - - 450,000 1,700,000 10,200,000 8,100,000 6 BWTP Project 8 - Floculation Basins 11,670,000 335,000 835,000 2,500,000 4,000,000 2,500,000 1,500,000 7 BWTP Project 11 - Ozone 38,720,000 220,000 3,500,000 8,000,000 12,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 8 BWTP Project 16 - Intake Screens 1,470,000 1,160,000 310,000 - - - - 9 Land - Plant Expansion 800,000 800,000 - - - - - 10 Reservoir Storage Tank - Zone 2 22,000,000 - 1,000,000 1,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 11 Richardson Rd Water Main Replacement - Rd 84 to Rd 96 490,000 - - - - 100,000 390,000 12 Riverhaven St & W Havstad St Water Main Extension - Rd 36 to Rd 39 805,000 - - - - 125,000 680,000 13 Road 49 Water Main Replacement - Replace 2in with 8in South of Sylvester 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - - - 14 Rd 60 Water Main Replacement - Court St to W Pearl St 1,365,000 - - - - 315,000 1,050,000 15 Rd 76 Water Main Replacement - Wernett Rd to W Court St 965,000 - - - - 195,000 770,000 16 Rd 103 Water Main Extension - Maple Dr to Willow Way 257,000 - - - - 52,000 205,000 17 Seismic Improvements - Various Facilities 3,500,000 - 400,000 775,000 775,000 775,000 775,000 18 Star Lane Water Main Replacement - Rd 100 to Rd 97 325,000 - - - 69,500 255,500 - 19 West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Expansion (Phase 3 & 4) - Firm Capacity & 18MG 13,400,000 8,100,000 4,300,000 1,000,000 - - - 20 Zone 2 PRVs (Hillsboro & Capital)2,000,000 - 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - 152,597,000 18,040,000 19,794,000 24,689,000 33,819,500 34,359,500 21,895,000 Pa g e 1 3 3 o f 1 3 7 PRELIMINARY 2026-2031 CIP WORKSHEET 6-year Capital Plan Total (EXCLUDES 2025) FY 2026 Capital Costs FY 2027 Capital Costs FY 2028 Capital Costs FY 2029 Capital Costs FY 2030 Capital Costs FY 2031 Capital Costs IRRIGATION 1 Irrigation System Expansion (Pump station and transmission main) 6,375,245 4,065,245 2,310,000 - - - - 2 Drill New Irrigation Wells 4,175,000 - - 1,035,000 1,265,000 1,875,000 - 10,550,245 4,065,245 2,310,000 1,035,000 1,265,000 1,875,000 - PWRF 1 PWRF Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements 5,600,000 3,000,000 2,600,000 - - - - 2 PWRF Irrigation System - Farm Upgrades 17,500,000 6,000,000 500,000 11,000,000 - - - 3 PWRF Lab and Office 950,000 - - 150,000 400,000 400,000 4 Complete Line Replacement for Foster Wells, 8”&16” 10,500,000 500,000 2,000,000 8,000,000 34,550,000 9,000,000 3,100,000 11,000,000 650,000 2,400,000 8,400,000 STORM 1 Infiltration Improvements Program 2,500,000 900,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 - 2 Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement 300,000 300,000 - - - - - 3 Stormwater Pipe Relining (Phase 1)1,415,000 - 115,000 750,000 550,000 - - 4 Stormwater Pipe Relining (Phase 2)600,000 - - - 100,000 500,000 - 5 Sylvester Pipe Repair - 5th Ave to 10th Ave 893,000 893,000 - - - - 5,708,000 1,200,000 1,408,000 1,150,000 1,050,000 900,000 - Pa g e 1 3 4 o f 1 3 7 Parks, Recreation & Facilities Capital Improvement Projects Project Number Request Title Est. Total Project Costs Historical Cost + 2025 Anticipated FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 A Street Sports Complex Phase 2 $3,180,000 $0 $80,000 $100,000 $3,000,000 A Street Sports Complex Phase 3 $3,700,000 $0 $100,000 $3,600,000 Big Cross Mountain Bike Trails $250,000 $0 $250,000 Burden Blvd. Soccer Complex Improvements ‐ Phase 2 $4,200,000 $0 $200,000 $4,000,000 22 408 City Hall Generator $472,763 $5,763 $467,000 23 474 City‐Wide Trail Connection and Trail Improvement $720,000 $225,000 $120,000 $120,000 $125,000 $130,000 23 535 Dog Park New Construction ‐ W A St & S 17th Ave $200,000 $0 $100,000 $100,000 Downtown Lighting Pilot Program $382,000 $100,000 $32,000 $150,000 $100,000 Foster Wells Sports Complex $3,200,000 $0 $200,000 $3,000,000 21 220 Franklin County Irrigation District Trail New Construction Phase 1 & 2 $500,000 $0 $75,000 $225,000 $200,000 23 536 GESA Stadium Parking Lot Refurbishment $4,600,000 $0 $4,600,000 23 472 Irrigation Clock Conversion Replacement ‐ City Wide $1,055,000 $255,000 $200,000 $200,000 $400,000 Land Purchases ‐ Parks $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 Lighted Pickleball Complex ‐ Broadmoor Area $1,560,000 $0 $60,000 $1,500,000 23 519 Marina Dock B Replacement $2,461,000 $151,000 $2,310,000 21 314 Martin Luther King Center Renovation/Expansion $13,770,000 $4,320,000 $4,720,000 $4,730,000 23 543 Memorial Park Conversion of Play Fields Refurbishment $970,000 $20,000 $950,000 New Request Nature Trail Linear Park $900,000 $0 $900,000 23 554 Neighborhood Skate Spots $50,000 $0 $50,000 New Request Pasco Marina Dock C $500,000 $0 $500,000 Pasco Specialty Kitchen Building Expansion $3,700,000 $650,000 $3,050,000 New Request Pasco Sporting Complex ‐ Soccer Facility Fence $300,000 $0 $300,000 23 473 Peanuts Park North Refurbishment $801,900 $151,800 $300,000 $350,000 Playground update and Pour‐in‐place conversion program Replacement ‐ Parks Through $1,030,000 $0 $330,000 $340,000 $360,000 Police Department Headquarters Expansion $15,200,000 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $7,500,000 $6,700,000 22 409 Police HQ Generator $426,118 $12,118 $414,000 21 260 Rd 54 Erwin Park $1,070,000 $0 $70,000 $1,000,000 21‐262 Regional Wayfinding and City Gateways $500,000 $0 $500,000 Road 48 ‐ Central Pasco Community Park $7,200,000 $0 $200,000 $7,000,000 21 219 Road 80 Park (fka Road 84 Park) $900,000 $600,000 $300,000 21 261 Sacajawea Trail BNSF Crossing $3,250,000 $0 $500,000 $2,000,000 $750,000 16 001 Sacajawea Trail Levee Lowering ‐ Rd 52 to Rd 72 $3,250,000 $0 $250,000 $3,000,000 Shoreline Drive Park $14,180,000 $120,000 $14,000,000 21 258 Signature Community Park $7,600,000 $0 $3,600,000 $4,000,000 23 480 Sun Willows Pro Shop and Restaurant Replacement $1,075,000 $0 $1,075,000 24 633 Thunderbird/Farmer's Market Parking Lot $250,000 $16,000 $234,000 21 257 West Side Community Center $13,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 Xeriscape Program ‐ Boulevards, Facilities & Parks $1,250,000 $150,000 $500,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Total Estimated Costs for All Parks, Recreation & Facilities $119,153,781 $6,776,681 $8,792,000 $13,545,000 $23,235,000 $24,215,000 $21,830,000 $20,700,000 Total 2026‐2031 CIP Total $112,317,000 Pa g e 1 3 5 o f 1 3 7 Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re- investment in community infrastructure. City Council Goals QUALITY OF LIFE 2024-2025 Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services and programs. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system. COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK Implement targeted strategies to reduce crime through strategic investments in infrastructure, staffing, and equipment. COMMUNITY SAFETY Promote and encourage economic vitality. ECONOMIC VITALITY Identify opportunities to enhance City of Pasco identity, cohesion, and image. CITY IDENTITY Page 136 of 137 METAS DEL CONCEJO MUNICIPAL 2024-2025 Promover una alta calidad de vida a través de programas, servicios y inversion apropiada y reinversión en la comunidad infraestructura comunitaria. CALIDAD DE VIDA Promover viabilidad financiera a largo plazo, valor, y niveles de calidad de los servicios y programas. SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA Promover un sistema de transporte multimodal altamente funcional. RED DE TRANSPORTE DE LA COMUNIDAD Implementar estrategias específicas para reducir la delincuencia por medios de inversiones estratégicas en infraestructura, personal y equipo. SEGURIDAD DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica. VITALIDAD ECONOMICA Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la cohesión, y la imagen. IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA Page 137 of 137