The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2025.02.24 Council Workshop Packet AGENDA City Council Workshop Meeting 7:15 PM - Monday, February 24, 2025 Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar Page 1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment) to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this workshop. The Pasco City Council Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco. To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-332-249-0718 and use access code 355 674 749#. 2. CALL TO ORDER 3. ROLL CALL 4. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS 5. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT – the public may comment on each topic scheduled for discussion, up to 2 minutes per person with a total of 8 minutes per item. If opposing sides wish to speak, then both sides receive an equal amount of time to speak or up to 4 minutes each side. 3 - 4 (a) Presentation - Pasco Municipal Court Overview (12 minutes staff presentation) Presentation from the Honorable Judge Craig Stilwill & Grecia Delgado, Court Community Resource Coordinator 5 - 105 (b) Resolution - 2025-2029 Tri-Cities HOME Consortium Consolidated Plan/2025 Annual Action Plan (15 minutes staff presentation) Page 1 of 269 106 - 229 (c) DKS Associates Red Light Cameras Study Phase 3 Presentation & Resolution - 5-Year Agreement with Verra Mobility for Red Light Cameras (10 minutes staff presentation) Presentation - Aaron Berger, of DKS Associates, will report on the detailed analysis, findings and recommendations regarding the Automated Traffic Safety Camera program. 230 - 267 (d) Irrigation Utility Revenue Requirements & Connection Charges (20 minutes staff presentation) 6. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION (a) To Consider Site Selection or Acquisition of Real Estate Purchase or Lease if Likelihood that Disclosure Would Increase Price per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) (15 minutes) 8. ADJOURNMENT 9. ADDITIONAL NOTES 268 - 269 (a) Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only) (b) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the City Clerk for assistance. Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.) Page 2 of 269 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 19, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 2/24/25 FROM: Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager City Manager SUBJECT: Presentation - Pasco Municipal Court Overview (12 minutes staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presentation from the Honorable Judge Craig Stilwill & Grecia Delgado, Court Community Resource Coordinator III. FISCAL IMPACT: NA IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The Pasco Municipal Court adjudicates various cases, including misdemeanor criminal cases, traffic and non-traffic infractions, and parking violations. The court is responsible for ensuring that legal processes for these cases are carried out fairly and efficiently. It also monitors defendants' compliance with court-ordered conditions of probation through its Probation Division. It operates independently from county and state courts, which handle more serious felony cases and civil matters beyond municipal jurisdiction. PMC includes:  Clerks office  Probation services  Graffiti Abatement  Courtroom security  Work crew  Court Community Resource Program Page 3 of 269 V. DISCUSSION: Tonight’s presentation will provide an overview of Pasco Municipal Court services, as well as information on Court Community Resource Program. Page 4 of 269 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 19, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 2/24/25 FROM: Craig Raymond, Deputy Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Consolidated Consortium HOME Tri-Cities - Resolution 2025-2029 Plan/2025 Annual Action Plan (15 minutes staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Power Point Presentation 2025-2029 Tri-Cities Home Consortium Consolidated Plan/2025 Annual Action Plan Proposed Resolution II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: The Consolidated plan does include the potential allocation of federal funding received by the City for the CBDG and Home programs. With the current pause by the federal government on federal funding to local governments, staff is closely monitoring this program and exercising due caution prior to making any significant decisions regarding possible expenditures, obligation or representation by the City. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) requires all cities receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and/or HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) funds to develop a five-year Consolidated Plan. For this process, the City of Pasco has historically partnered with the cities of Richland and Kennewick as the Tri-Cities HOME Consortium. The 2025-2029 plan was developed through the consortium through a robust public process. The plan is to identify community needs, set priorities, evaluate market conditions, and outline strategies for effectively utilizing federal funds to address identified needs within the plan horizon. The current five-year Tri- Cities HOME Consortium Consolidated Plan, covering the Cities of Kennewick, Page 5 of 269 Pasco, and Richland, expired on December 31, 2024. To continue meeting federal requirements and eligibility for this funding, and guide future investment, the Tri-Cities HOME Consortium has prepared a new Consolidated Plan for the 2025-2029 program years. The Consortium engaged the Cloudburst Group to assist in developing this plan, ensuring a data-driven, place-based approach to funding decisions. The updated plan serves as a strategic framework for allocating CDBG and HOME funds, with a focus on expanding access to quality housing, improving living environments, and fostering economic opportunities for low and moderate-income residents. Over the next five fiscal years, the City of Pasco is projected to receive approximately $4 million in combined federal funding, including $3.3 million in CDBG and $0.7 million in HOME funds. All federally funded activities from 2025 through 2029 must align with the goals and priorities outlined in the new Consolidated Plan as adopted. The plan is structured to allow flexibility in program implementation while ensuring that funding decisions effectively address community priorities now and in into the five-year plan horizon. V . DISCUSSION: During the development of the Consolidated Plan, the Tri-Cities HOME Consortium engaged with a broad range of partners, agencies, and stakeholders through eight hybrid consultation sessions. These discussions provided valuable insights on key issues shaping the plan’s priorities. In total, the Consortium consulted with 47 unique organizations through these sessions and a stakeholder survey. To further inform the plan, the consultant conducted a review of local plans and facilitated focus groups with community stakeholders. Additionally, the public had an opportunity to contribute input on community needs and priorities through a community survey, which was completed on September 20, 2024. The 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan is built around three strategic goals: Page 6 of 269 To ensure transparency, promote community engagement, and comply with program requirement, the draft plan was publicly advertised on December 16, 2024, for a 30-day comment period, which concluded on January 16, 2025. A public hearing was also advertised and held before the Planning Commission on January 16, 2025, to gather additional input. No public comments were received. Staff will provide a briefing on the plan highlights, take input and respond to questions Council may have regarding the plan with the intent for Council adoption of the 2025-2029 Tri-Cities HOME Consortium Consolidated Plan/2025 Annual Action Plan at the next available regular meeting. Page 7 of 269 February 24, 2025 Pasco City Council Workshop Pa g e 8 o f 2 6 9 2025-2029 Tri-Cities HOME Consortium Consolidate Plan/2025 Annual Action Plan February 24, 2025 City Council Pa g e 9 o f 2 6 9 BACKGROUND 3 •Each year the Tri -Cities Consortium receives federal funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to support programs that benefit low-and moderate-income people. •The Consolidated Plan which is updated every five years is designed to help states and local jurisdictions to assess their affordable housing, community development needs, the market conditions, and to make data-driven decisions. •The present 2020-2024 Tri -Cities HOME Consortium Consolidated Plan expired December 31, 2024. Pa g e 1 0 o f 2 6 9 CONSOLIDATED PROCESS 4 •Since July 2024, the Cloudburst Group, serving as a consultant, has collaborated with staff from Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland to gather stakeholder and public input, assess community needs, and conduct statistical research. •Six hybrid consultation sessions, attended by community partners and agencies, were held on September 5th and 6th. Additionally, two virtual focus groups with planning and public works representatives from each city took place on September 10th and 11th. •The online community survey was open from August 15, 2024, to September 20, 2024. Pa g e 1 1 o f 2 6 9 5 PLAN HIGHLIGHTS •Housing Barriers & Affordability Challenges – Low vacancy rates, aging housing stock, and long waitlists for public housing make affordability and accessibility a growing issue. •Gaps in Public Infrastructure & Services – High demand for mental health services, sidewalk improvements, and shelter options highlight critical investment needs. •Resilience Building & Hazard Risks – Flooding, drought, and wildfires disproportionately impact low-income residents, emphasizing the need for resilient housing and infrastructure. Pa g e 1 2 o f 2 6 9 GOALS AND 5-YEAR ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE 6 Council approves budget authorization in an annual basis. Pa g e 1 3 o f 2 6 9 7 PLAN ADOPTION NEXT STEPS •City Council Review & Adoption – Presentation at the City Council Workshop on February 24, with formal approval scheduled for March 3. •Submission to HUD – The plan will be submitted to HUD for approval following the receipt of the estimated FY 2025 funding letter. •Implementation & Oversight – Upon HUD approval, the plan will guide funding and programs for the next five fiscal years (2025-2029). •Fair Housing Plan Update – Once the Consolidated Plan is in place, work will resume on updating the Fair Housing Plan. Pa g e 1 4 o f 2 6 9 QuestionsPa g e 1 5 o f 2 6 9 TRI-CITIES HOME CONSORTIUM 2025-2029 TRI-CITIES CONSOLIDATED PLAN Page 16 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 3 ES-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – 24 CFR 91.200(C), 91.220(B) ............................................................................................. 3 THE PROCESS ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 PR-05 LEAD & RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES - 91.200(B) ............................................................................................................. 9 PR-10 CONSULTATION - 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(B), 91.300(B), 91.215(L) AND 91.315(I) ................................................. 10 PR-15 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION - 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(C) AND 91.300(C) ....................................................................... 26 NA-05 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................................ 28 NA-50 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS - 91.415, 91.215 (F) ................................................................... 31 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................... 36 MA-05 OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................................................... 36 MA-45 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSETS - 91.410, 91.210(F) .................................................................. 39 MA-50 NEEDS AND MARKET ANALYSIS DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................... 47 MA-60 BROADBAND NEEDS OF HOUSING OCCUPIED BY LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS - 91.210(A)(4), 91.310(A)(2) ............................................................................................................................................................. 49 MA-65 HAZARD MITIGATION - 91.210(A)(5), 91.310(A)(3) ............................................................................................. 51 STRATEGIC PLAN .................................................................................................................................................. 52 SP-05 OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................................................... 52 SP-10 GEOGRAPHIC PRIORITIES - 91.415, 91.215(A)(1) .................................................................................................... 53 SP-25 PRIORITY NEEDS - 91.415, 91.215(A)(2)............................................................................................................... 54 SP-30 INFLUENCE OF MARKET CONDITIONS - 91.415, 91.215(B) ........................................................................................ 61 SP-35 ANTICIPATED RESOURCES - 91.420(B), 91.215(A)(4), 91.220(C)(1,2)....................................................................... 63 SP-40 INSTITUTIONAL DELIVERY STRUCTURE - 91.415, 91.215(K) ........................................................................................ 65 SP-45 GOALS - 91.415, 91.215(A)(4) ........................................................................................................................... 69 SP-65 LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS - 91.415, 91.215(I) ................................................................................................... 73 SP-70 ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY - 91.415, 91.215(J) ....................................................................................................... 74 SP-80 MONITORING - 91.230 ....................................................................................................................................... 75 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ......................................................................................................................................... 76 AP-15 EXPECTED RESOURCES - 91.420(B), 91.220(C)(1,2) ............................................................................................... 76 AP-20 ANNUAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES - 91.420, 91.220(C)(3)&(E) ................................................................................. 79 AP-35 PROJECTS - 91.420, 91.220(D) ........................................................................................................................... 81 AP-35 PROJECT SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 82 AP-50 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION - 91.420, 91.220(F) ................................................................................................... 86 AP-85 OTHER ACTIONS - 91.420, 91.220(K) ........................................................................................................... 87 AP-90 PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS - 91.420, 91.220(L)(1,2,4) ............................................................................... 89 Page 17 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-05 Executive Summary – 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction Each year the Tri-Cities (comprised of Kennewick, WA; Pasco, WA; and Richland, WA) receives federal funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to support affordable housing and community development programs that primarily benefit low- and moderate-income people. This funding comes from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME). To receive this funding, the Tri-Cities develops a Consolidated Plan every five years to outline the jurisdiction’s funding strategy over the next five fiscal years. The Consolidated Plan incorporates information gathered through data analysis and consultation with a range of voices in the community—including Tri-Cities residents, low- and moderate-income people, and organizations that work with or have specific knowledge of needs facing low- and moderate-income communities—to identify the Tri-Cities’ current housing and community development needs and outline the specific goals and expected outcome for the use of CDBG and HOME funds. Each of the federal grant programs included in the Consolidated Plan (CDBG and HOME) has its own unique requirements, uses, and jurisdictional boundaries. To qualify for an investment of HOME funding, Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland partnered to form the Tri-Cities HOME Consortium (“the Consortium”), with Richland serving as the lead entity. Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland each receive their own annual CDBG allocations from HUD. This Consolidated Plan informs the use of the Tri-Cities’ HOME allocation and Pasco CDBG allocation. 2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview The Tri-Cities anticipates receiving the following annual grant amount over the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan for program years 2025–2029. • HOME: $652,569. • CDBG: $677,540. (Pasco) The Tri-Cities Consortium intends to use these funds to further three primary goals: Goals Description 1 Affordable Housing—Pasco will work to preserve and expand the supply of affordable housing by funding activities such as homeowner and rental rehab. Additionally, Pasco will support housing code enforcement to aid low- and moderate-income households in maintaining safe and decent housing. 2 Community and Economic Development—Pasco will support investments in low-income communities to ensure access to thriving, connected, and inclusive communities by funding activities such as public facility rehabilitation, community development, infrastructure improvements, and other non-housing public services. 3 Public Services—Pasco will support individuals and families by investing in housing and supportive services to increase self-sufficiency and wellbeing among low- and moderate- income households in Pasco. Page 18 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 4 The Strategic Plan section of the Consolidated Plan provides more information on Pasco’s goals, objectives, and specific strategies designed to make progress toward those goals. 3. Evaluation of past performance The Tri-Cities Home Consortium has made significant steps toward accomplishing the goals outlined in the previous Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan. There continues to be strong relationships among community partners in implementing projects and building capacity. Listed below are the accomplishments made toward the Consortium’s 2020–2024 goals and the percentage of the goal that has been completed. HOME • HOME funds assisted 322 households with TBRA (161 percent). • HOME funds assisted 13 households with direct financial assistance to homebuyers (20.63 percent). • HOME funds rehabilitated 4 homeowner household units (4 percent). • HOME funds added 29 homeowner housing units (n/a). Pasco CDBG • CDBG funds assisted 267,673 persons with public service activities (homeless intervention and public services) other than low-/moderate-income housing benefits (74.73 percent). • CDBG funds supported the creation/retention of 13 jobs (86.67 percent). • CDBG fund assisted two businesses with façade treatment/business building rehabilitation (100 percent). • CDBG funds assisted 39,385 persons with public service activities (community, neighborhood, and economic development) other than low-/moderate-income housing benefits (51.66 percent). • CDBG funds assisted 58,348 persons with public facility or infrastructure activities other than low- /moderate-income housing benefits (537.27 percent). • CDBG funds supported the rehabilitation of two rental housing units (100 percent). • CDBG funds supported the rehabilitation of thirteen homeowner housing units (86.67 percent). • CDBG funds assisted 2,096 housing units with housing code enforcement/foreclosed property care (83.84 percent). 4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The Consortium followed the requirements for citizen participation outlined in the Tri-Cities Consortium Citizen Participation Plan, which requires each city to hold two public hearings regarding the use of CDBG funds and a 30-day public comment period upon publishing the draft. Additionally, the Citizen Participation Plan requires the Consortium to hold two public hearings regarding the use of HOME funds and a 30-day public comment period upon publishing the draft. Page 19 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 5 Pasco held two public hearings on June 20, 2024, and July 18, 2024, regarding the use of Consortium HOME funds and Pasco CDBG funds. Pasco will hold an additional hearing during the public comment period, which will occur from December 16, 2024, to January 16, 2025, regarding the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and 2025 Annual Action Plan. In addition to the citizen participation process, the Consortium consulted with stakeholders and partners from agencies, organizations, and other groups that work directly with or have knowledge of the needs of low- and moderate-income people in the Tri-Cities. The Consortium distributed an online stakeholder survey and conducted six hybrid consultation sessions on the topics of: • Continuum of care (CoC) and homeless services • Public and human services • Youth services • Special needs populations • Public housing authorities (PHAs) and affordable housing • Economic development • Fair housing • Public works Between the stakeholder consultation sessions and online survey, the Consortium gathered input from 47 unique organizations in the development of the Consolidated Plan. 5. Summary of public comments Pasco did not receive comments during the public hearings held on June 20, 2024, and July 18, 2024. Pasco will update this section of the Consolidated Plan following the end of the written public comment period and second public hearing. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them Pasco did not receive comments during the public hearings held on June 20, 2024, and July 18, 2024. Pasco will update this section of the Consolidated Plan following the end of the written public comment period and second public hearing. 7. Summary The Consolidated Plan provides an overview of housing and community development needs in the Tri- Cities. Below are the key takeaways synthesized from the data analysis and outreach process. Housing Need, Condition, and Availability • There has been a significant jump in affordable housing needs for every population in the past two years. • Elderly households, renter households, extremely low-income households, certain racial groups (including African American and Asian households), and households in Pasco and Kennewick are more affected by housing problems than other community residents. • A variety of factors, including mental health and substance use disorder needs, compound with Page 20 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 6 housing problems to exacerbate housing instability. There is a need for mental health and substance use disorder supportive services to accompany housing services. • Low vacancy rates and a limited supply of naturally affordable and accessible housing and assisted units create a need for new developments and rehabilitation of existing units. • With a large portion of Consortium households living in a unit built prior to 1980, there is a need to inspect and possibly rehabilitate units with structural or health concerns. • Low- and moderate-income households tend to live in older, more naturally affordable units, which puts them at a greater risk of housing problems. Public Housing • Public housing and voucher programs have low turnover of units and long wait lists, leaving many residents unserved by these programs. • Voucher recipients often face additional barriers to obtaining housing, such as stringent inspection criteria on Section 8 units. Persons with physical disabilities have significant challenges finding accessible units. • A sizable percentage of public housing residents and voucher recipients live in households with either a person with a disability or a senior, which indicates a need for more accessible housing units. • There is an identified need to continue the maintenance and rehabilitation of public housing units in need of repair. Homelessness, Supportive Services, and Shelter Facilities • The housing and supportive service needs of households experiencing homelessness is greater than what can be provided with current resources in the Tri-Cities. • Unsheltered homelessness increased in the community from 2022 to 2023, indicating a need for more housing and supportive services for that population. • The current shelter capacity and resources are not sufficient to meet the needs of the community. • There is a lack of transitional housing, shelters for specific populations, and low-barrier options observed by service providers. • Stakeholders note that even with these services, they are seeing an increased demand for housing and supportive services that oftentimes outpaces provider capacity. • There is a need for more mental health and substance use disorder services. Non-Housing Community Development Needs • Community members desire increased maintenance and new developments of community centers and recreation facilities. • Street and sidewalk enhancements, particularly to improve connectivity and accessibility for pedestrians, are an identified need for community members and stakeholders. Economic Development • There exist notable barriers for residents in the workforce to obtain and maintain employment, such as a lack of affordable housing and childcare costs. Page 21 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 7 • Increasing connectivity to both transportation and job networks will help qualified candidates obtain and maintain employment. • The business and workforce community in the Tri-Cities is still feeling the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Broadband • While broadband availability has increased in the past five years, there still exists digital equity gaps among vulnerable groups, including seniors and people living with a disability. Natural Hazards • The Tri-Cities maintain a moderate risk of flooding, drought, and wildfires. However, the effects of natural hazards are amplified among low- and moderate-income populations, who often have limited resources to flee dangerous conditions and recover quickly from severe weather events. Page 22 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 8 THE PROCESS The process consists of three sections: • Lead & Responsible Agencies • Consultation • Citizen Participation Together, these sections describe the nature and results of outreach efforts conducted during the development of the Consolidated Plan. Page 23 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 9 PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies - 91.200(b) The PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies section of the Consolidated Plan identifies the agencies overseeing the development of the Consolidated Plan. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for the administration of each grant program and funding source. Table 1—Responsible Agencies Agency Role Name Department/Agency CDBG Administrator Pasco Community & Economic Development Narrative As the lead entity for the Consortium, the City of Richland’s Development Services Department led the development of the Consortium Consolidated Plan, which outlines the city’s strategy for its CDBG allocation and the Consortium’s HOME allocation for the next five years. The City of Pasco, as an entitlement community, supported the development of the Consortium Consolidated Plan and the administration of the HOME program and developed this Consolidated Plan regarding the administration of CDBG funds. Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information City Contact Information Pasco Kristin Webb CDBG Administrator webbk@pasco-wa.gov (509) 543-5739 Page 24 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 10 PR-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(l) and 91.315(I) Introduction The PR-10 Consultation section of the Consolidated Plan summarizes the consultation process for the development of the Consolidated Plan. The Consortium routinely coordinates with partner agencies and organizations in the administration, implementation, and evaluation of CDBG programs to meet both the Consortium’s and Pasco’s Consolidated Plan goals and objectives. In the development of the 2025–2029 Consolidated Plan, the Consortium sought input from partners and stakeholders through consultation sessions and an online stakeholder survey. The Consortium held six hybrid consultation sessions (hosted on September 5 and 6) and two virtual consultation sessions (hosted on September 10 and 11). Listed below are the topics of each consultation session, which were well attended by community partners and agencies: • CoC and homeless services • Public and human services • Youth services • Special needs populations • PHA and affordable housing • Economic development • Fair housing • Public works The online community survey through SurveyMonkey was open from August 15, 2024, to September 20, 2024. In that time, 27 stakeholders responded to the survey. The survey asked respondents to identify, rank, and provide commentary on community needs on the following topic areas: • Affordable housing • Housing and supportive services • Public facilities and infrastructure • Human services • Fair housing Between both methods of outreach, the Consortium consulted with 47 unique organizations. Listed below are common themes stakeholders expressed across consultation sessions and survey results: • Housing issues, including unaffordability and lack of available units, have worsened significantly since the previous Consolidated Planning process. Page 25 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 11 • Many available units are not accessible to people with physical disabilities or do not meet Section 8 inspection criteria, further limiting housing options. • The demand for housing and supportive services, particularly mental health and substance use disorder services, is greater than the current capacity of service providers. • Lack of connectivity, especially in rural areas of the Consortium, exacerbates inequalities, particularly hindering residents from obtaining and maintaining employment. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health, and service agencies (91.215(I)). Tri-Cities staff work with a variety of nonprofit and governmental agencies during the planning, project proposal, and implementation stages of the programs. Pasco is responsible for all functions of its CDBG program. A primary strength of the Tri-Cities Consortium is the close working relationship between the cities and the departments charged with administering the HUD programs. In turn, agencies such as Benton Franklin Community Action Connections, Tri-Cities Development Council (TRIDEC), the Benton Franklin CoC, Benton Franklin Council of Governments, and several nonprofit agencies work in all three cities, improving the effectiveness of coordination and efficiencies. The fact that the three cities are in proximity, with common issues and opportunities, provides a basis for cooperation and shared understanding. Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness. The Benton Franklin CoC (which is part of the Washington Balance of State [BoS] Continuum), managed by the Benton & Franklin Counties Department of Human Services, is the lead entity responsible for coordinating the homelessness response system in the Tri-Cities. Each of the three cities has voting membership within the CoC and collaborated with the CoC in drafting the Benton & Franklin Counties Five-Year Plan to End Homelessness (2020–2025). The plan includes the following principles intended to promote coordination across community partners and work to reduce homelessness in the community. • Efficacy—Increase the efficacy of existing housing and service systems through coordination, collaboration, and communication between agencies to benefit the homeless population. • Flexibility—Emphasize the ability of housing and services strategies to easily adapt to emerging trends and needs, both in the homeless population and in the housing market. • Sustainability—Implement strategic distribution of available funding streams and identify and pursue additional funding sources. • Innovation—Incorporate best practices, new research, and case studies. • Awareness—Ensure that the community, through education and outreach, is a place where all are accepted and build public and political will to focus on the problem. • Accountability—Define success and collect accurate data about the problem and solutions while continually evaluating the system. Page 26 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 12 Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies, and procedures for the administration of HMIS. The Benton & Franklin Counties Department of Human Services (CoC) is an active member of the Washington BoS Continuum (WA-501). The Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) funds made available to the Tri-Cities are allocated from the Washington BoS. The ESG program coordination is conducted through the BoS Steering Committee on a policy level and through the Department of Commerce for administrative procedures. The Department of Commerce also staffs the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS), which is essentially statewide. While staff at the local nonprofit and county CoC level enter data in HMIS, they also maintain the data and prepare periodic reports on program outcomes, which are readily accessible to the Tri-Cities CoC. At least once a year, the Department of Commerce consults with all ESG stakeholders to review performance standards and obtain their input on fund allocation proposals, policy plans, and administrative procedures. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations, and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities. Table 2 lists all the agencies and organizations that provided input in the development of the Consolidated Plan. The Consortium sought input from all the required organization types for the Consolidated Plan through consultation sessions and an online stakeholder survey. Overall, the Consortium gathered input from 47 unique organizations. Page 27 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 13 Table 2—Agencies, Groups, and Organizations that Participated # Agency/Group/ Organization Agency/Group/Organization Type Section of Plan Addressed Method of Consultation Anticipated Outcomes or Areas for Improved Coordination 1 Snipes H3 Housing Services—Children Services—Education Services—Employment Housing Needs Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 2 Richland School District Services—Education Housing Needs Assessment Homeless Needs— Families with Children Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 3 Kennewick School District Services—Education Housing Needs Assessment Homeless Needs— Families with Children Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 4 Fourth Dimension Living Other—Business Entity Housing Needs Assessment Homelessness Strategy Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 5 Benton Franklin Health District Services—Health Health Agency Housing Needs Assessment Homelessness Strategy Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 6 Greater Health Now Services—Health Housing Needs Assessment Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 7 Senior Life Resources Northwest Services—Elderly Persons Services—Persons with Disabilities Housing Needs Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing Pa g e 2 8 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 14 # Agency/Group/ Organization Agency/Group/Organization Type Section of Plan Addressed Method of Consultation Anticipated Outcomes or Areas for Improved Coordination 8 Domestic Violence Services of Benton and Franklin Counties Housing Services—Victims of Domestic Violence Housing Needs Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Consultation Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 9 Supportive Services for Veterans (Blue Mountain Action Council) Housing Other—Services—Veterans Services—Homeless Homelessness Needs— Veterans Non-Homeless Special Needs Homelessness Strategy Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 10 Benton County Human Services Other Government—County Housing Need Assessment Homelessness Needs— Veterans Market Analysis Consultation Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 11 Tri-Cities Chaplaincy Other—Religious Organization Housing Need Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Consultation Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 12 Opportunities Industrialization Center of Washington Other—Services—Veterans Services—Homeless Housing Need Assessment Homelessness Needs— Veterans Non-Homeless Special Needs Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing Pa g e 2 9 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 15 # Agency/Group/ Organization Agency/Group/Organization Type Section of Plan Addressed Method of Consultation Anticipated Outcomes or Areas for Improved Coordination 13 Washington State 211 Services—Homeless Services—Health Services—Education Services—Employment Housing Need Assessment Homelessness Strategy Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 14 Lutheran Community Services Housing Services—Children Services—Elderly Persons Housing Need Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Consultation Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 15 Washington Monitoring Services—Employment Other—Services—Veterans Housing Housing Need Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 16 Sent to Serve Housing Services—Homeless Homelessness Strategy Homeless Needs— Families with Children Homeless Needs— Chronically Homeless Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 17 Habitat for Humanity Housing Housing Need Assessment Market Analysis Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing Pa g e 3 0 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 16 # Agency/Group/ Organization Agency/Group/Organization Type Section of Plan Addressed Method of Consultation Anticipated Outcomes or Areas for Improved Coordination 18 Benton Franklin Community Action Connection Services—Homeless Housing Housing Need Assessment Homeless Needs— Chronically Homeless Homeless Needs— Families with Children Market Analysis Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 19 Benton Franklin Council of Governments Regional Organization Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Market Analysis Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 20 Tri-Cities Regional Chamber of Commerce Business Leaders Regional Organization Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Market Analysis Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 21 TRIDEC Regional Organization Planning Organization Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Market Analysis Consultation Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 22 Visit Tri-Cities Regional Organization Planning Organization Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Market Analysis Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 23 Port of Benton Other Government—Local Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Market Analysis Consultation Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 24 Benton and Franklin Counties Human Services Department Services—Children CoC Services—Persons with Disabilities Housing Need Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing Pa g e 3 1 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 17 # Agency/Group/ Organization Agency/Group/Organization Type Section of Plan Addressed Method of Consultation Anticipated Outcomes or Areas for Improved Coordination 25 Lourdes Behavioral Health Services—Health Services—Homeless Homelessness Strategy Market Analysis Homeless Needs— Families with Children Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 26 Pasco Public Works Department Other Government—Local Market Analysis Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 27 Pasco Parks and Recreation Department Other Government—Local Market Analysis Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 28 Richland Public Works Department Other Government—Local Market Analysis Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Consultation Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 29 Ben Franklin Transit Planning Organization Regional Organization Market Analysis Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Consultation Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 30 Kennewick Community and Development Services Department Other Government—Local Housing Need Assessment Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Strategy Anti-Poverty Strategy Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Market Analysis Consultation Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing Pa g e 3 2 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 18 # Agency/Group/ Organization Agency/Group/Organization Type Section of Plan Addressed Method of Consultation Anticipated Outcomes or Areas for Improved Coordination 31 Richland Community and Development Services Department Other Government—Local Housing Need Assessment LBP Strategy Anti-Poverty Strategy Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Market Analysis Consultation Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 32 Pasco Community Development Services Department Other Government—Local Housing Need Assessment LBP Strategy Anti-Poverty Strategy Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Market Analysis Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 33 Ben Franklin Legal Aid Service—Fair Housing Housing Need Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Consultation Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 34 City of Pasco Code Division Other Government—Local Market Analysis Housing Need Assessment Consultation Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 35 Northwest Fair Housing Alliance Service—Fair Housing Housing Need Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Consultation Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing Pa g e 3 3 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 19 # Agency/Group/ Organization Agency/Group/Organization Type Section of Plan Addressed Method of Consultation Anticipated Outcomes or Areas for Improved Coordination 36 Communities in Schools of Benton- Franklin Services—Education Non-Homeless Special Needs Non-Housing Community Development Strategy Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 37 Grace Clinic Services—Health Services—Persons with Disabilities Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 38 Support, Advocacy & Resource Center Services—Victims of Domestic Violence Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 39 Benton Rural Electric Association Regional Organization Market Analysis Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 40 Retter & Co. Sotheby’s Business Leaders Housing Need Assessment Market Analysis Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 41 Elijah Family Homes Housing Housing Need Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 42 Northwest Justice Project Service—Fair Housing Housing Need Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing Pa g e 3 4 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 20 # Agency/Group/ Organization Agency/Group/Organization Type Section of Plan Addressed Method of Consultation Anticipated Outcomes or Areas for Improved Coordination 43 Ziply Fiber Business Leaders Market Analysis Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 44 Housing Authority of the City of Pasco and Franklin County PHA Housing Need Assessment Public Housing Needs Market Analysis Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 45 My Friends Place Services—Homeless Services—Children Housing Need Assessment Homelessness Needs— Unaccompanied youth Market Analysis Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 46 The Arc of Tri-Cities Services—Persons with Disabilities Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing 47 Benton-Franklin Juvenile Court Other Government—Local Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Survey Provided input into the development of the Consortium’s Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing Pa g e 3 5 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 21 Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting. The Consortium did not exclude any agencies or organizations in the consultation process for the Consolidated Plan. Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan. The Consortium considered multiple local and regional planning efforts, listed in Table 3, while developing the Consolidated Plan. Table 3—Other Local/Regional/Federal Planning Efforts Name of Plan Lead Organization How the Goals of the Strategic Plan Overlap with the Goals of Each Plan Domestic Violence Services of Benton and Franklin Counties 2022 Annual Report Domestic Violence Services of Benton and Franklin Counties The Domestic Violence Services of Benton and Franklin Counties Annual Report provides information on the services provided to individuals and families seeking services, which informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. Domestic Violence Services of Benton and Franklin Counties 2018 Annual Report Domestic Violence Services of Benton and Franklin Counties The Domestic Violence Services of Benton and Franklin Counties Annual Report provides information on the growth in services requested and provided to individuals and families seeking services, which informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. Kennewick Housing Authority and Housing Authority of the City of Pasco and Franklin County 5-Year Plan (2024–2028) Kennewick Housing Authority and Housing Authority of the City of Pasco and Franklin County The 5-Year Plan outlines the services provided by the PHAs and their goals for the next five years, which align with the Consortium’s goals. Tri-Cities HOME-ARP Allocation Plan (2023) Tri-Cities Consortium The Tri-Cities HOME-ARP Allocation Plan describes the needs and services available to qualifying populations (including people experiencing or at risk of experiencing homelessness) in the Consortium. The information provided informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. Page 36 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 22 Name of Plan Lead Organization How the Goals of the Strategic Plan Overlap with the Goals of Each Plan Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse (Richland School District) Washington State Department of Social and Health Services The Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse describes the characteristics and needs of people with substance use disorder, which informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse (Kennewick School District) Washington State Department of Social and Health Services The Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse describes the characteristics and needs of people with substance use disorder, which informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse (Pasco School District) Washington State Department of Social and Health Services The Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse describes the characteristics and needs of people with substance use disorder, which informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. Benton and Franklin Counties 2022 Community Health Needs Assessment Benton-Franklin Health District The Community Health Needs Assessment describes health indicators in the Consortium and summarizes community input on health needs, including housing and supportive services. The information provided informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. 2022 Washington State HIV Washington State Department of The Washington State HIV Surveillance Report Health Surveillance Report provides information on the number and nature of people with HIV/AIDS in the Consortium. The information provided informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. 2023 HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Public Health Seattle and King The HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Report Report and Community Profile County and Community Profile describes the housing and service needs of people living with HIV/AIDS. The information provided informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. City of Richland Comprehensive Plan 2017 Richland, WA The Comprehensive Plan provides insight into the housing needs of the city and outlines the city’s strategic housing and community development goals, which align with the Consolidated Plan goals. Page 37 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 23 Name of Plan Lead Organization How the Goals of the Strategic Plan Overlap with the Goals of Each Plan City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan 2018–2038 Pasco, WA The Comprehensive Plan provides insight into the housing needs of the city and outlines the city’s strategic housing and community development goals, which align with the Consolidated Plan goals. City of Kennewick Comprehensive Plan 2017–2037 Kennewick, WA The Comprehensive Plan provides insight into the housing needs of the city and outlines the city’s strategic housing and community development goals, which align with the Consolidated Plan goals. The Washington State The Washington State Department The Housing Advisory Plan provides Department of Commerce 2024 of Commerce information on the number of Housing Advisory Plan housing units needed in Benton and Franklin Counties to meet future demand. The information provided informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. Benton and Franklin Counties Benton and Franklin CoC The Five-Year Plan to End Five-Year Plan to End Homelessness provides information Homelessness (2020–2025) on the institutional structure of the CoC and outlines strategic goals to reduce homelessness and improve service delivery in the Consortium. The goals outlined in the plan align with the Consolidated Plan goals. Benton and Franklin Counties 5- Year Homeless Housing Plan Annual Report Benton and Franklin CoC The 5-Year Homeless Housing Plan Annual Report provides information on the institutional structure of the CoC, which informs the Consortium’s goals. HUD 2023 CoC Homeless HUD The Homeless Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Housing Housing Inventory Count Report Inventory Count Report provides information on the types and amounts of shelter beds available for people experiencing homelessness. The information provided informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. The Benton-Franklin Council of The Benton-Franklin Council of The CEDS outlines strategic goals to Governments 2021–2025 Governments promote economic development in Comprehensive Economic the Consortium. These goals align Development Strategy (CEDS) with the Consolidated Plan goals. Page 38 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 24 Name of Plan Lead Organization How the Goals of the Strategic Plan Overlap with the Goals of Each Plan The Tri-City Regional Chamber of Commerce 2023 Annual Report The Tri-City Regional Chamber of Commerce The Annual Report provides information on initiatives and programs supported by the Chamber of Commerce. The information provided informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. 2023 Benton County Broadband and Digital Access Plan The Benton-Franklin Council of Governments The Broadband and Digital Access Plan outlines the connectivity needs of Tri-Cities populations. The information provided informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. 2023 Franklin County Broadband and Digital Access Plan The Benton-Franklin Council of Governments The Broadband and Digital Access Plan outlines the connectivity needs of Tri-Cities populations. The information provided informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. Benton County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (2019) Benton County, WA The Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan describes the risks of natural disasters and community needs in the Tri-Cities. The information provided informs the Consortium’s goals and strategies. Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(l)). In the development of the Consolidated Plan, the Consortium consulted with numerous public entities, which included working closely with other member jurisdictions of the Consortium. During the consultation process, the Consortium gathered input from public entities, including: • Benton and Franklin Counties Human Services Department • Pasco Public Works Department • Pasco Parks and Recreation Department • Richland Public Works Department • Kennewick Community and Development Services Department • Richland Community and Development Services Department • Pasco Community Development Services Department • City of Pasco Code Division • Richland School District Page 39 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 25 • Kennewick School District • Benton Franklin Health District • Benton County Human Services • Benton Franklin Council of Governments Page 40 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 26 PR-15 Citizen Participation - 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c) The PR-15 Citizen Participation section of the Consolidated Plan outlines the methods and results of citizen participation in the development of the Consolidated Plan. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation. The Consortium followed the requirements for citizen participation outlined in the Tri-Cities Consortium Citizen Participation Plan, which requires each city to hold two public hearings regarding the use of CDBG funds and a 30-day public comment period upon publishing the draft. Additionally, the Citizen Participation Plan requires the Consortium to hold two public hearings regarding the use of HOME funds and a 30-day public comment period upon publishing the draft. Pasco hosted two public hearings on June 20, 2024, and July 18, 2024. Pasco will hold an additional hearing during the public comment period, which will occur from December 16, 2024, to January 16, 2025, regarding the Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan and the Pasco 2025 Annual Action Plan. Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting. Through the consultation process, the Consortium made significant efforts to proactively receive feedback from persons with disabilities, non-English speaking persons, and minorities. Through the citizen participation process, the Consortium also encouraged public comments through public hearings and the public comment period in the following ways: • Announcement on the City of Pasco website. • Announcement on the City of Pasco Facebook page. • Ad in the Tri-City Herald. • Ad in the Tu Decides. • Physical copies of the Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan and Pasco’s 2025 Annual Action Plan placed in lobbies of public buildings and public libraries. • Promoted during stakeholder consultation sessions. Citizen Participation Outreach Table 4 summarizes citizen participation and outreach efforts. Page 41 of 269 Table 4—Citizen Participation Outreach Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of Response/Attendance Summary of Comments Received Summary of Comments Not Accepted and Reasons 1 Other: Public hearings held on June 20, 2024 & July 18, 2024 Non-targeted/broad community No comments were received No comments were received No comments were received 2 Other: Public hearing held on January 16, 2025 3 Newspaper Ad published on May 1, 2024 Non-targeted/broad community No comments were received No comments were received No comments were received Pasco Consolidated Plan | 27 Pa g e 4 2 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 28 NA-05 Overview Needs Assessment Overview The Needs Assessment is comprised of six sections: • Housing Needs Assessment • Disproportionately Greater Need • Public Housing • Homeless Needs Assessment • Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment • Non-Housing and Community Development Needs Together, these sections present key housing and community development needs of low- and moderate- income people in the Tri-Cities HOME Consortium. The needs identified in this section inform the Strategic Plan, which outlines how Pasco will use its CDBG funds over the next five years. The Needs Assessment utilizes two primary data sources: data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) and custom tabulations of ACS data called the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data. The Consortium analyzed the most recent data sets available at the time of drafting for both sources, which were the 2016–2020 five-year CHAS estimates and 2018–2022 ACS five-year estimates. In addition, the Consortium facilitated consultation sessions with partner agencies and organizations and distributed online stakeholder and community surveys to better understand current trends impacting the region. Finally, the Consortium analyzed information from other available sources such as local reports, plans, and studies. Definition of Low- and Moderate-Income Households HOME and CDBG funds programs principally benefit low- and moderate-income households. A household is defined as all the people who occupy one housing unit, which includes families, unrelated people such as roommates, and people living alone. The low- and moderate-income levels for a particular community are determined by the area median income (AMI) of that specific place. Households earning less than 80 percent of the AMI are considered moderate-income. Households earning less than 50 percent AMI are considered low-income, and households earning less than 30 percent AMI are considered extremely low-income. Throughout the Consolidated Plan, the term “low- and moderate-income households” describes all households earning less than 80 percent AMI. Table 5 presents the 2024 low- and moderate-income limits for the Kennewick-Richland Metropolitan Statistical Area, which covers Kennewick, Richland, and Pasco. For example, a four-person household is considered to have a low to moderate income if they earned less than $79,900 annually. Page 43 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 29 Table 5—Kennewick-Richland, WA Metropolitan Statistical Area HUD Income Limits (2024) Income Category 1 Person In Household 2 People in Household 3 People in Household 4 People in Household 5 People in Household 6 People in Household Extremely Low-Income $21,000 Income Limit $24,000 Income Limit $27,000 Income Limit $31,200 Income Limit $36,580 Income Limit $41,960 Income Limit (0–30% AMI) Low-Income (30–50% AMI) $35,000 Income Limit $40,000 Income Limit $45,000 Income Limit $49,950 Income Limit $53,950 Income Limit $57,950 Income Limit Moderate Income (50– 80% AMI) $55,950 Income Limit $63,950 Income Limit $71,950 Income Limit $79,900 Income Limit $86,300 Income Limit $92,700 Income Limit Data Source: 2024 HUD Income Limits Documentation. Key Themes from the Needs Assessment The following summary includes data from the City of Pasco. Themes were drawn from consultations across the three cities. Demographics • 45 percent of residents identified as a race other than White. • 55 percent of residents identified as Hispanic or Latino. • 12 percent of residents lived with a disability. • Single-family households comprised 8 percent of total households. • 9 percent of residents were aged 65 years old or older. Housing Needs • There has been a significant jump in affordable housing needs for every population in the past two years. • In 2020, 14 percent of households paid between 30–50 percent of their income on housing costs, and 9 percent of households paid more than 50 percent of their income on housing costs. • Elderly households, renter households, extremely low-income households, certain racial groups (including African American and Asian households), and households in Pasco and Kennewick are more affected by housing problems than other community residents. • A variety of factors, including mental health and substance use disorder needs, compound with housing problems to exacerbate housing instability. There is a need for mental health and substance use disorder supportive services to accompany housing services. Page 44 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 30 Public Housing • Public housing and voucher programs have low turnover of units and long wait lists, leaving many residents unserved by these programs. • Voucher recipients often face additional barriers to obtaining housing, such as stringent inspection criteria on Section 8 units. Persons with physical disabilities have significant challenges finding accessible units. • A sizable percentage of public housing residents and voucher recipients live in households with either a person with a disability or a senior, which indicates a need for more accessible housing units. Homelessness and Supportive Services • The housing and supportive service needs of households experiencing homelessness are greater than what can be provided with current resources in the Tri-Cities. • Special populations, including people with disabilities, require additional and specialized supportive services. • Unsheltered homelessness increased in the community from 2022 to 2023, indicating a need for more housing and supportive services for that population. • There is a need for more mental health and substance use disorder services. Non-Housing Community Development Needs • Community members desire increased maintenance and new developments of community centers and recreation facilities. • Street and sidewalk enhancement, particularly to improve connectivity and accessibility for pedestrians, is an identified need for community members and stakeholders. Page 45 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 31 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs - 91.415, 91.215 (f) Introduction The NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs section of the Consolidated Plan describes the public facilities, public infrastructure, and public services needs of the Consortium as a whole, which informs the non-housing community development needs in Pasco. Data for this section is provided by the following data sources: • 2025–2029 Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan Stakeholder Survey. • 2025–2029 Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan Community Survey. • Consultation sessions with organizations, agencies, and partners working with low- and moderate-income people in the community. • Data on calls for assistance from 211 from October 1, 2023, to September 29, 2024, in Benton and Franklin Counties. Overall, stakeholders and community members emphasized a need for the following: • Community centers and recreation facilities, including maintenance on existing infrastructure and new developments. • Street and sidewalk enhancements, particularly to improve connectivity and accessibility for pedestrians. • Mental health and substance use disorder services. Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Facilities. How were these needs determined? Across the three forms of engagement described below, two common themes for public facility improvements emerged: • Expansion and maintenance of park and recreation facilities. • Improvements to community facilities for specific groups, particularly residents who are unhoused or who are low- to moderate-income. Stakeholder Survey Responses Ten respondents of the stakeholder survey provided input on the need for public facilities in the Consortium. The first question asked respondents to select the public facility activities they believe are needed most in the Tri-Cities. Listed below are the top two selections and the percentage of respondents who selected the activity: • Community centers for specific groups (70 percent). • Parks and recreational facilities (50 percent). Page 46 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 32 The next question asked respondents to rank public facility activities based on need. Listed below are the top-ranked public facility needs selected by respondents and their corresponding weighted scores (scores closest to twelve indicate the highest-ranked choice). • Community centers for specific groups (7.6). • Parks and recreational facilities (6.9). Community Survey Responses Ninety respondents of the community survey provided input on the need for public facilities in the Consortium. The question asked respondents to select three facility activities that are most needed to serve low- and moderate-income people in the Tri-Cities. Listed below are the top three selections and the percentage of respondents who selected the activity. • Improvements to facilities for people who are unhoused (61.1 percent). • Improvements to nonprofit buildings that serve low- and moderate-income people or neighborhoods (51.1 percent). • Improvements to facilities for people with special needs such as seniors, youth, people with disabilities, victims of domestic violence, etc. (50 percent). Stakeholder Consultation The Consortium held a consultation with eight participants on the subject of city planning and public works, which included representatives from Public Works, Parks and Recreation, and Community Planning departments. Listed below are common themes that emerged from the consultation session regarding public facility needs: • Aging infrastructure, particularly in older areas of the Tri-Cities, needs maintenance. • Increased requests from residents for increased parks and recreation services. • Current parks and recreation buildings need maintenance. Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Improvements. How were these needs determined? Across the three forms of engagement described below, two common themes for public improvements emerged: • Street and sidewalk improvements, particularly to remove barriers for seniors and those with a disability. • Water infrastructure improvements. Stakeholder Survey Responses Ten respondents to the stakeholder survey provided input on the need for public improvements in the Consortium. The first question asked respondents to select the public improvement activities they believe are needed most in the Tri-Cities. Listed below are the top three selections and the percentage of respondents who selected the activity: • Street and sidewalk improvements (50 percent). Page 47 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 33 • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility improvements (50 percent). • Street lighting improvements (50 percent). The next question asked respondents to rank public improvement activities based on need. Listed below are the top-ranked public improvement needs selected by respondents and their corresponding weighted scores (scores closest to twelve indicate the highest ranked choice). Note that respondents ranked water and infrastructure improvements as the most needed public improvement. • Water infrastructure improvements (9.2). • Street and sidewalk improvements (8.9). • ADA accessibility improvements (8.6). Community Survey Responses Ninety respondents of the community survey provided input on the need for public improvements in the Consortium. The question asked respondents to select three infrastructure activities that are most needed to serve low- and moderate-income people in the Tri-Cities. Listed below are the top three selections and the percentage of respondents who selected the activity. • Street and sidewalk improvements (63.3 percent). • Traffic lights/signs and public safety improvements (56.7 percent). • Broadband internet access improvements (45.6 percent). Stakeholder Consultation The Consortium held a consultation with eight participants on the subject of city planning and public works, which included representatives from Public Works, Parks and Recreation, and Community Planning departments. Listed below are common themes that emerged from the consultation session regarding public improvement needs: • Need to remove barriers in streets, such as curb and ramp improvements, to increase accessibility. • Interest in making public improvements in areas with limited connectivity and low car ownership rates. • Some water and sewer infrastructure are currently under maintenance, but more attention is needed to the system, particularly with algae blooms in the Columbia River posing an additional challenge to some water sources. Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services. How were these needs determined? Across the four forms of engagement described below, two common public service needs emerged: • Mental health services. • Substance use disorder treatment services. Page 48 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 34 Stakeholder Survey Responses Fourteen respondents of the stakeholder survey provided input on the need for public services in the Consortium. The first question asked respondents to select the public services activities they believe are needed most in the Tri-Cities. Listed below are the five selections and the percentage of respondents who selected the activity: • Mental health services (92.86 percent). • Substance use disorder treatment services (78.57 percent). • Youth programs and services (50 percent). • Childcare services (50 percent). • Services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, dating violence, and human trafficking (50 percent). The next question asked respondents to rank public facility activities based on need. Listed below are the top-ranked public service needs selected by respondents and their corresponding weighted scores (scores closest to twenty indicate the highest-ranked choice). Note that respondents ranked substance use disorder treatment services as the most needed public service. • Substance use disorder treatment services (18.71). • Mental health services (18). • Services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and human trafficking (16.14). • Childcare services (15.64). • Services for persons with a disability (15.36). Community Survey Responses Ninety respondents of the community survey provided input on the need for human services in the Consortium. The question asked respondents to select five human services that are most needed to serve low- and moderate-income people in the Tri-Cities. Listed below are the top five selections and the percentage of respondents who selected the activity. • Mental health services (73.3 percent). • Services for people who are unhoused (51.1 percent). • Substance use disorder treatment services (50 percent). • Services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, dating violence, or human trafficking (34.4 percent). • Senior services (28.9 percent). Stakeholder Consultation The Consortium held three consultation sessions with community partners and organizations to access service needs in the Tri-Cities. The sessions covered the following topics: Special Needs Service Providers (five participants), Public and Human Services (six participants), and Youth Service Providers (eight Page 49 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 35 participants). Listed below are common themes that emerged from the consultation sessions regarding public service needs: • Transportation was a noted barrier for clients, emphasizing a need for transit and transportation services. • As the Tri-Cities continues to diversify, there is a need for services to be provided in multiple languages. Languages noted include Burmese, Ukrainian, and Spanish. • The need for public and human services is higher than what some organizations can provide due to staffing issues. • Need for increased mental health services. 211 Data 211 Washington provides information on the number of calls received to 211 and the services requested. The Consortium reviewed call data from October 1, 2023, to September 29, 2024, for Benton and Franklin Counties. Between those dates, 211 received 8,921 calls originating in the two counties. Listed below are the most common non-housing services requested through 211 and the percentage of calls it constituted. • Food (13.8 percent): o 76.4 percent of requests in this category were for help buying food. • Government and legal (9.1 percent): o 27.3 percent of requests in this category were for housing law services. • Utilities (8.4 percent): o 51.1 percent of requests in this category were for assistance with electricity. Page 50 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 36 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS MA-05 Overview Housing Market Analysis Overview: The Housing Market Analysis describes the landscape in which the Tri-Cities administers its programs by identifying the housing market, economic, and community development factors impacting low- and moderate-income people and communities in the Consortium. The Market Analysis is comprised of eleven sections: • Number of Housing Units • Cost of Housing • Condition of Housing • Public and Assisted Housing • Homeless Facilities and Services • Special Needs Facilities • Barriers to Affordable Housing • Non-Housing and Community Development Assets • Needs and Market Analysis Discussion • Broadband Needs of Housing • Hazard Mitigation Like the Needs Assessment, the Market Analysis utilizes two primary data sources: the 2018–2022 ACS and the 2016–2020 CHAS. These are the most recent versions of the data sets available at the time of drafting. This section also summarizes information from other existing reports, studies, and plans as well as input from the stakeholder survey, community survey, and consultation sessions to better understand recent trends impacting the region. Key Themes from the Market Analysis: Listed below are the major trends the Consortium identified as impacting low- and moderate- income households. Housing Condition and Availability • Low vacancy rates and a limited supply of naturally affordable housing and assisted units create a need for additional affordable housing units. • There is a lack of accessible affordable housing units for people with disabilities. • As population and housing needs increase and developments with assisted units expire in the coming decades, the Tri-Cities could experience even greater demand for affordable housing units. Page 51 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 37 • With a large portion of Consortium households living in a unit built prior to 1980, there is a need to inspect and possibly rehabilitate units with structural or health concerns. • Low- and moderate-income households tend to live in older, more naturally affordable units, which puts them at a greater risk of housing problems. • Rehabilitation is needed to ensure an adequate supply of accessible units. • There is an identified need to continue maintenance and rehabilitation of public housing units in need of repair. • The need for assisted and public housing units in the Consortium is not met by the current voucher and unit portfolio. Housing Affordability and Cost • Increasing housing costs, coupled with the increased cost of other necessities (including food, childcare, and transportation), place considerable financial pressure on households across the Consortium, particularly for low- to moderate-income households. • It is likely that the continued rise of rents and home values will further exacerbate existing affordability issues in the coming five years. • Given the severity of housing cost burden and unaffordability emphasized by community members and stakeholders, traditional methods to calculate subsidies, such as fair market rents and HOME rents, fall short of bridging the unaffordability gap. Shelter Facilities and Services • The current shelter capacity and resources are not sufficient to meet the needs of the community. • There is a lack of transitional housing, shelters for specific populations, and low-barrier options observed by service providers. • Stakeholders note that even with these services, they are seeing an increased demand for housing and supportive services that oftentimes outpaces provider capacity. Economic Development • There exist notable barriers for residents in the workforce to obtain and maintain employment, such as lack of affordable housing and childcare costs. • Increasing connectivity, both to transportation and job networks, will help qualified candidates obtain and maintain employment. • The business and workforce community in the Tri-Cities is still feeling the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Broadband • While broadband availability has increased in the past five years, there still exists digital equity gaps among vulnerable groups, including seniors and people living with a disability. Page 52 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 38 Natural Hazards • The Tri-Cities maintain a moderate risk of flooding, drought, and wildfires. However, the effects of natural hazards are amplified among low- and moderate-income populations, who often have limited resources to flee dangerous conditions and recover quickly from severe weather events. Page 53 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 39 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets - 91.410, 91.210(f) Introduction The MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets section of the Consolidated Plan summarizes data trends related to employment and the workforce, including labor for participation, educational attainment, and workforce skills, training, and development efforts in the Tri-Cities. Data regarding educational attainment and median income comes from the 2018–2022 ACS. Data on jobs by sector comes from the most recent Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics data (2021). To compare jobs more accurately with workers, Table 6 uses 2017–2021 ACS estimates. Overall, stakeholders note that COVID-19 has changed the landscape of the economy in the past five years. Additionally, high cost of living and connectivity issues serve as barriers to obtaining and maintaining employment. Economic Development Market Analysis The Tri-Cities is home to a diverse economy. The three cities enjoy a favorable geographic position located at the confluence of the Columbia River and its major tributaries, the Snake and Yakima Rivers, and are surrounded by more than a million acres of farmland in Benton and Franklin Counties. Production, manufacturing, and food processing are noted industries in the region. The forthcoming sections outline the business activity and education trends observed in the Tri-Cities according to 2022 ACS data. Business Activity The characteristics of the workforce provide insight into the nature of the economy and economic development needs in the region. Table 6 summarizes the number of workers and jobs in Pasco in each sector in 2021. According to 2021 ACS data, the three most common sectors by worker and job were education and health care services, professional, retail trade, and manufacturing. Of note, the percentage of manufacturing jobs in Pasco was 7 percent higher than in the Tri-Cities as a whole, indicating a higher concentration in the city. Page 54 of 269 Table 6—Business Activity Business by Sector Number of Workers Number of Jobs Share of Workers % Share of Jobs % Jobs Less Workers % Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction 2,374 1,117 10% 5% -5% Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 1,388 1,719 6% 8% 2% Construction 1,942 2,132 8% 10% 2% Education and Health Care Services 5,204 5,368 21% 24% 3% Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 975 524 4% 2% -2% Information 139 73 1% 0% 0% Manufacturing 2,519 2,652 10% 12% 2% Other Services 802 569 3% 3% -1% Professional, Scientific, Management Services 2,853 1,121 12% 5% -7% Public Administration 1,348 650 5% 3% -3% Retail Trade 2,529 2,982 10% 14% 3% Transportation & Warehousing 1,483 1,622 6% 7% 1% Wholesale Trade 988 1,490 4% 7% 3% Grand Total 24,544 22,019 100% 100% 0% Data Source: 2017–2021 ACS (Workers), 2021 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (Jobs). Pasco Consolidated Plan | 40 Pa g e 5 5 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 41 Below is the unemployment rate in Pasco in 2022. In that year, 5.8 percent of Pasco residents were unemployed, which was like the Consortium unemployment rate of 5.1 percent. The unemployment rate was nearly triple for 16–24-year-old residents at 15.8 percent, which is 5 percentage points higher than the average for the Tri-Cities Consortium as a whole. Table 7—Labor Force Labor Force Metric Number or Percentage of Population Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 37,297 Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 34,983 Unemployment Rate 5.8% Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 15.8% Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 3.6% Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS Table 8 summarizes the occupations of Pasco workers by sector in 2022. The most common sector of employment was management, business, and financial, accounting for 30 percent of workers. Table 8—Occupations by Sector Occupations by Sector Number of People Management, business, and financial 10,762 Farming, fisheries, and forestry occupations 2,772 Service 6,098 Sales and office 6,386 Construction, extraction, maintenance, and repair 3,438 Production, transportation, and material moving 5,537 Data Source: 2018–2022 ACS. Table 9 provides information on the average commute time of Pasco residents. Most residents (74 percent) had a commute under 30 minutes. Table 9—Travel Time Travel Time Number Percentage < 30 Minutes 23,825 74% 30–59 Minutes 6,459 20% 60 or More Minutes 1,758 5% Total 32,042 100% Data Source: 2018–2022 ACS. Page 56 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 42 Education Educational attainment provides insight into the training and job needs of residents. Table 10 displays the educational attainment by employment status of Pasco residents in 2022. Predictably, increases in education level correlated with decreases in unemployment. Five percent of people without a high school diploma were unemployed in 2022 compared to 1 percent of people with a bachelor’s degree or higher. Table 10—Educational Attainment by Employment Status Educational Attainment Residents In Labor Force (Civilian Employed) Residence In Labor Force (Unemployed) Not in Labor Force Less than high school graduate 6,145 343 1,990 High school graduate (includes equivalency) 7,183 432 1,862 Some college or associate degree 8,770 196 863 Bachelor’s degree or higher 6,450 87 2,635 Data Source: 2018–2022 ACS. Table 11 displays educational attainment by age. Overall, 30 percent of Pasco residents had a bachelor’s degree or higher, while 76 percent of residents had a high school diploma or higher. Compared to the Consortium as a whole, the educational attainment rate for both categories are 10 percent lower. Table 11—Educational Attainment by Age Educational Attainment 18 24 yrs (Age) 25 34 yrs (Age) 35 44 yrs (Age) 45 65 yrs (Age) 65+ yrs (Age) Less than 9th grade 172 874 1,507 3,020 1,296 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 1,664 1,121 1,245 1,356 406 High school graduate, GED, or alternative 2,719 2,982 2,931 3,692 1,930 Some college, no degree 2,340 3,034 2,135 2,449 1,696 Associate degree 567 1,173 854 1,288 658 Bachelor’s degree 332 2,197 1,012 1,566 615 Graduate or professional degree 7 732 773 1,120 671 Data Source: 2018–2022 ACS. Table 12 shows the 2022 median earnings of Pasco residents with varying levels of educational attainment. In each city, higher levels of educational attainment correlated with increased median earnings. Page 57 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 43 Table 12—Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Educational Attainment Pasco Less than high school graduate $32,385 High school graduate (includes equivalency) $40,026 Some college or associate degree $49,212 Bachelor’s degree $72,340 Graduate or professional degree $89,211 Data Source: 2018–2022 ACS. Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction? According to 2021 ACS data, the three most common sectors by worker and job in Pasco were: • Education and health care services (21 percent of workers and 24 percent of jobs). • Manufacturing (10 percent of workers and 12 percent of jobs). • Retail trade (10 percent of workers and 14 percent of jobs). Within these sectors, there are a variety of employers in the region. Listed below are the ten largest employers and their sectors in the Tri-Cities as reported by the Tri-City Development Council. Many of these employers align with the major sectors identified. In addition, this list identifies food processing and environmental remediation as additional sectors in the Tri-Cities. • Battelle/Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (Research and Development) • Kadlec Regional Medical Center (Health Care) • Kennewick School District (Education) • Lamb Weston (Food Processing) • Washington River Protection Solutions (Environmental Remediation) • Pasco School District (Education) • First Fruits Farms (Food Processing) • Richland School District (Education) • Central Plateau Cleanup Company (Environmental Remediation) • Bechtel National (Engineering and Construction) Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community. The Consortium conducted a consultation with economic development organizations regarding the needs of the business community. Stakeholders noted that employers face challenges finding workers. Listed below are common themes that emerged from the consultations as to why employers are struggling to Page 58 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 44 hire. Overcoming these barriers to employment for Tri-Cities residents is a need of the business community. • Lack of access to childcare services is prohibitive to people entering the workforce. • Transportation is a large barrier to maintaining employment. • Potential workers and businesses have a lack of understanding about available opportunities and the pathway to those opportunities. • Lack of affordable housing opportunities makes it difficult for potential workers to relocate. • The pandemic shifted the demographics of the workforce. Many residents are opting for remote work opportunities and a higher number of women are exiting the workforce. Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create. The Benton-Franklin Council of Governments 2021–2025 CEDS outlines several initiatives the counties will take to promote economic development, including supporting the following projects: • Creating a Regional Post-Disaster Economic Recovery and Resilience Plan. • Infrastructure projects to support industrial development. • Support for clean energy projects. Additionally, since 2022, the Tri-City Regional Chamber of Commerce has operated the Benton County Business Resource Initiative, which provides financial assistance to businesses negatively impacted by COVID-19. In 2023, the program awarded 161 grants ranging from $3,000 to $30,000 with a total investment of over three million dollars. These funds can be used for workforce training, work incentive bonuses, rent/utilities assistance, digital platform upgrades, and outdoor space enhancements. The Tri-City Regional Chamber of Commerce writes in its 2023 Annual Report that this program is a catalyst for transformative change within the business community to allow small businesses to recover from the pandemic and become resilient to future challenges. In supporting small businesses, these grants help to create more opportunities for businesses to expand, with potential infrastructure and employment needs following. Finally, in October 2024, Lamb Weston announced the closure of a potato processing plant in Franklin County, which employed 375 residents. The plant closure will likely impact the workforce and economy of the region as displaced workers look to find other employment opportunities. The TRIDEC noted that the organization will provide job search support to laid-off workers. How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction? In 2022, 20 percent of Pasco residents over the age of 25 obtained a bachelor’s degree or higher. Many positions in the top sectors of the Consortium, such as professional, scientific, and management services, Page 59 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 45 health care: and education, require a bachelor’s degree. Additionally, as stated previously in this section, stakeholders noted that hiring employees with the necessary training is a barrier to economic development. Stakeholders noted that some residents might not know the options or pathways to engage with employment opportunities. Other residents, such as limited English speakers, face additional barriers to obtaining employment despite having the necessary skill set. Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan. There are several initiatives and programs to develop the workforce in the Tri-Cities and to prepare for changing industries. Washington State University, Tri-Cities offers, in addition to 4-year degrees and professional programs, specialized course work at the Bio-Products, Science and Engineering Laboratory, which was developed in partnership with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. This is industry- targeted, as are other programs offered, such as the program in viticulture and enology. Columbia Basin College in Pasco offers several workforce programs targeted to trades, business, health care, and public services. While programs are available and affordable, there is a need to reach out in a more coordinated way to potential students and the business community, as there is a need for a central information system. The High School Academy at Columbia Basin College recruits’ youth ages 16 to 20 to achieve a high school diploma and advanced career training. The initiative is the result of a partnership with schools, the Fast Forward Program (Boys and Girls Club), the Benton Franklin Juvenile Justice Center, and community agencies. The Small Business Development Center at TRIDEC helps start-up companies and small businesses and is a partnership with Columbia Basin College; Washington State University, Tri-Cities; US Small Business Administration; and local and regional governments in providing support and training for businesses. The Pasco Specialty Kitchen focuses on goods-based business development. The fully equipped and licensed kitchen, partially funded by the US Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration, supports developing businesses, and provides training and other support. The Specialty Kitchen and Farmer’s Market are projects supported by the Downtown Pasco Development Authority. Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)? Yes. If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth. The Benton-Franklin Council of Governments 2021–2025 CEDS includes the following goals: • Improve the municipal infrastructure to support a growing and diverse population in an increasingly carbon-free economy. • Effectively plan for economic diversification and innovation. • Enhance economic resilience and workforce development. Page 60 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 46 • Improve the quality of life of residents and expand the number of tourism-related activities. Discussion The Consortium identifies the key themes of this section to be as follows: • There exist notable barriers for residents in the workforce to obtaining and maintaining employment, such as lack of affordable housing and childcare costs. • Increasing connectivity, both to transportation and job networks, will help qualified candidates obtain and maintain employment. • The business and workforce community in the Tri-Cities is still feeling the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Page 61 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 47 MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") As of 2024, there have been no significant changes to the areas identified with concentrated housing problems in Pasco and the surrounding Tri-Cities in the past five years. The eastern portions of each city, particularly those with older housing stock, continue to face housing challenges. This aligns with the ongoing concerns noted in 2019 regarding older housing being more prone to issues like structural decay and overcrowding, which is particularly prevalent in mobile home parks across the region. Stakeholders still emphasize the need for improvements in these areas, especially in older neighborhoods in Pasco where deteriorating housing conditions persist. These areas have also seen demographic shifts, with Pasco's population growth being driven by younger residents and a majority Latino population. The city's aging housing stock, especially in lower-income neighborhoods, continues to correlate with housing problems, reinforcing the need for targeted interventions in these eastern sectors. Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low- income families are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") As of the most recent data available in 2021, the two census tracts in Pasco were designated as racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs). These areas have been consistently recognized for their high minority populations and poverty rates above 40 percent. No significant changes have been reported in the identification of new R/ECAPs within the Tri-Cities, though the concentrated areas continue to exhibit ongoing socioeconomic challenges. Additionally, disparities in poverty rates for specific racial and ethnic groups (such as Black or African American, American Indian, Alaska Native, and Hispanic or Latino households) persist in Pasco and Kennewick, with poverty rates more than 5 percent higher than the general consortium average. Thus, while these concentrated areas remain largely the same, the economic disparities and challenges faced by these populations continue to be a critical focus for local and federal planning efforts. What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods? As of 2024, the characteristics of the housing market in areas of concentrated poverty in Pasco and the Tri-Cities remain like what was reported in 2019. These areas, particularly in the eastern portions of Pasco, continue to feature lower home values and rents, which are linked to the concentration of poverty and housing problems, such as overcrowding, substandard housing conditions, and cost burdens. While property values have risen across the broader Tri-Cities region due to population growth and economic development, the neighborhoods identified as R/ECAPs still lag in terms of housing quality and affordability. The demand for affordable housing has increased, but the older housing stock in these areas, including mobile home parks, continues to contribute to higher levels of housing-related issues. In summary, while there may be slight increases in overall property values due to regional economic growth, the fundamental market characteristics—low property values, aging housing stock, and significant housing demand—persist in these concentrated areas of poverty. These factors continue to exacerbate housing issues in the identified R/ECAPs in Pasco. Page 62 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 48 Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods? As of 2024, community centers and faith-based organizations remain vital assets in the low-income neighborhoods of Pasco and the broader Tri-Cities, particularly in areas with lower home values and rents. These resources continue to play a crucial role in providing social, educational, and support services to residents, especially in areas with concentrated poverty, like Pasco's R/ECAPs. The importance of these assets has not diminished but rather grown as population increases and economic disparities have heightened the demand for social services. While specific locations of community assets have remained largely the same, these organizations have adapted to the evolving needs of the community. For instance, some community centers and faith-based groups have expanded their services to include more focused assistance in areas like food security, housing support, and mental health, which are increasingly critical in these low-income areas. Overall, the role of community assets, such as faith-based organizations and community centers, continues to be a key factor in supporting low-income families in the Tri-Cities. These institutions provide vital social services and community connections, helping to alleviate some of the challenges faced by residents in these economically disadvantaged areas. Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas? As of 2024, the strategic opportunities for leveraging community assets and promoting inclusive development in Pasco and the surrounding Tri-Cities have not significantly changed from the 2019 findings. Encouraging inclusive development continues to be a priority, with a focus on utilizing community centers, faith-based organizations, and public infrastructure to revitalize economically disadvantaged areas. Each city operates under a Comprehensive Plan, which emphasizes mixed-use development, affordable housing, and improving public transportation. Pasco's Comprehensive Plan highlights strategic efforts to enhance the quality of life in low-income neighborhoods through public-private partnerships and investment in infrastructure. However, there has been increased attention on integrating sustainability and resilience into these development strategies, likely reflecting the broader focus on climate adaptation and resource efficiency in urban planning. One noticeable shift is the growing emphasis on sustainability and long-term resilience, particularly in response to the region's rapid population growth and economic changes. The Comprehensive Plans are evolving to address new challenges related to housing affordability, environmental sustainability, and the need for greater community involvement in development processes. Overall, while the core strategies of leveraging community assets and promoting inclusive development remain unchanged, there is a stronger focus on sustainability and resilience in the strategic opportunities for these areas. Page 63 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 49 MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2) Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households, including low- and moderate-income households and neighborhoods. According to 2022 ACS estimates, 5 percent of households in Pasco did not have internet access. Households without internet connection do not have equal access to resources such as those provided by government agencies, schools, and employers. In 2023, Benton and Franklin Counties both created Broadband and Digital Equity Local Action Plans that describe the needs of low- and moderate-income households and neighborhoods. The plans indicate that Northeastern Kennewick and census tracts along the Columbia River inside the cities of Kennewick and Pasco have the greatest need for digital equity. It is estimated that 15–22 percent of households in these census tracts do not have access to a computer, and 15–40 percent of households speak English as a second language. The report also lists the following populations as having the greatest need in Benton and Franklin Counties: • Incarcerated/recently released individuals. • Children and youth in foster care. • Non-English speakers. • Seniors. • Poverty-impacted individuals and families. • Housing insecure. • Veterans. • People with disabilities. • Marginalized groups. • People with low educational attainment. The reports call for the Tri-Cities to provide ongoing financial and technical support to populations with limited internet access, promote awareness regarding existing programs, and provide accommodations to people with a disability who may require special equipment and teaching. Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction. Overall, a lack of broadband provider competition can lead to market rigidity, which allows providers to charge higher prices for broadband. However, since 2019, the amount of service providers has increased in the Tri-Cities. As of 2021, no area in the Tri-Cities had fewer than four broadband internet providers. Available technologies include asymmetric digital subscriber line, cable, fiber, fixed wireless, and satellite. Page 64 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 50 Figure 1—Broadband Providers in the Tri-Cities Data Source: Federal Communications Commission, Fixed Broadband Deployment (2021). Page 65 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 51 MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3) Describe the jurisdiction’s increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change. Benton and Franklin Counties published Natural Hazard Mitigation Plans in 2019 and 2018, respectively. These plans assess each city’s risk of experiencing a natural hazard. Summarized below are the risks of each natural hazard. • Flooding: At the confluence of the Columbia, Snake, and Yakima rivers, the Tri-Cities is at moderate risk of flooding. While the construction of dams along these rivers has reduced flooding potential, increased hazard severity could result in dam failure and flooding. • Drought: The Tri-Cities are assessed at a moderate risk of drought. • Wildfires: While there is a high probability of fire ignition throughout the three cities, there is a moderate risk that these ignitions will turn into wildfires. Benton County Emergency Services, whose service area covers the Tri-Cities, works to minimize the impact of disasters on the people, property, economy, and environment of Benton County through comprehensive disaster planning, preparedness education, training, and resource coordination. Describe the vulnerability to these risks of housing occupied by low- and moderate-income households based on an analysis of data, findings, and methods. As outlined in both counties’ Natural Hazard Mitigation Plans, instances of flood, drought, wildfires, and severe weather can severely impact the region. Listed below are vulnerabilities indicated in the reports. • Droughts would impact the agricultural and water transportation industry, disrupting local economies. • Severe weather events can impact power sources, cause debris, and stress infrastructure and transportation, causing damage to personal property and municipal facilities. • Floods bring risks of landslides, as well as damage to infrastructure, roads, and personal property. • Wildfires threaten the health and safety of people and can cause displacement and damage to homes and property. As the risk of climate-related hazards increases, so does the vulnerability of low- and moderate-income households. Low- and moderate-income households may not have the means to evacuate hazardous situations or have the ability to recover quickly. For instance, low- and moderate-income households may be less likely to carry flood insurance. To mitigate risks to low- and moderate-income households, Benton County Emergency Services maintains a Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, which includes specific procedures as it pertains to mass sheltering. Page 66 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 52 STRATEGIC PLAN SP-05 Overview Strategic Plan Overview The Strategic Plan outlines Pasco’s goals, objectives, and specific strategies to work towards those goals and objectives over the next five federal fiscal years. The Strategic Plan is comprised of nine sections: • Geographic Priorities • Priority Needs • Influence of Market Conditions • Anticipated Resources • Institutional Delivery Structure • Goals • Lead-Based Paint Hazards • Anti-Poverty Strategy • Monitoring The three cities work together to prepare and submit the Consolidated Plan because they formed a HOME Consortium to receive HOME funds. Richland serves as the lead entity for the HOME Consortium and receives and administers HOME funds on behalf of all three cities. Each city directly receives its own separate allocations of CDBG funds. This Strategic Plan includes priority needs and goals for the use of Pasco’s CDBG allocation. This five-year strategic plan sets the framework for projects and activities in the Tri-Cities Consortium over the next five years. The three cities have identified a common set of priority needs for affordable housing and community development. There is one common goal framework for the use of HOME and CDBG funds. For CDBG, the cities share a common goal framework, but activities under each overarching goal vary based on the specific priorities within each city. Three priority needs were identified by the three cities: • The need for affordable housing creation, preservation, access, and choice. • The need for community, neighborhood, and economic development. • The need for supportive public services. Page 67 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 53 SP-10 Geographic Priorities - 91.415, 91.215(a)(1) The SP-10 Geographic Priorities section of the Consolidated Plan provides insight into how priority needs are selected, and investments are allocated. Geographic Area There are no specific geographic priority areas established in this Consolidated Plan. All funds will be utilized in eligible areas city-wide. General Allocation Priorities Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the state Pasco allocates funds to address strategies under the three overarching goal areas: • Affordable housing choice. • Community and economic development. • Public services. Investments are distributed throughout the three cities, and allocations are determined through the use of low- and moderate-income population data and other data as applicable. Rehabilitation of older housing stock was determined to be a priority for all three cities through quantitative and qualitative data analysis. The 2022 ACS data indicates that a significant percentage of housing structures in the Tri-Cities was built prior to 1980 and may need health and safety upgrades. Stakeholders noted that, oftentimes, Section 8 voucher recipients have difficulty finding units that meet the habitability criteria set by HUD due to poor unit conditions. Additionally, stakeholders note the limited amount of accessible housing available in the Tri-Cities. Thus, ensuring current affordable housing stock is not lost due to health and safety concerns and is accessible to people with physical disabilities is a priority. The cities will also continue to take advantage of opportunities to improve downtown areas, particularly in deteriorated areas. Stakeholders note that as public facilities continue to age, they require a greater degree of maintenance and rehabilitation. Additionally, stakeholders identified a need for greater job opportunities, affordable housing for workers, increased connectivity to job sites, and pathways for small businesses. Improvements to the vitality and viability of each city’s downtown region will help to attract and promote businesses that will potentially result in jobs for lower-income residents and improve connectivity. All three cities have and will continue to focus local and other resources on rebuilding the downtown areas. Page 68 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 54 SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.415, 91.215(a)(2) Priority Needs The SP-25 Priority Needs section of the Consolidated Plan provides greater detail into the goals outlined in the Strategic Plan. Table 13—Priority Need 1: Affordable Housing Choice Prompt Description Priority Level: High Description: Pasco will work to preserve and expand the supply of affordable housing by funding activities such as homeowner and rental rehabilitation. Additionally, Pasco will support housing code enforcement to aid low- and moderate-income households in maintaining safe and decent housing. Population Served: Income Level ☒ Extremely Low ☒ Low ☒ Moderate ☐ Middle Family Types ☒ Large Families ☒ Families with Children ☒ Elderly ☒ Public Housing Residents Pa g e 6 9 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 55 Prompt Description Population Served Homeless (Continued): ☐ Rural ☒ Chronic Homelessness ☒ Individuals ☒ Families with Children ☒ Mentally Ill ☒ Chronic Substance Abuse ☒ Veterans ☒ Persons with HIV/AIDS ☒ Victims of Domestic Violence ☒ Unaccompanied Youth Non-Homeless Special Needs ☒ Elderly ☒ Frail Elderly ☒ Persons with Mental Disabilities ☒ Persons with Physical Disabilities ☒ Persons with Developmental Disabilities ☒ Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions ☒ Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families ☒ Victims of Domestic Violence ☐ Non-Housing Community Development ☐ Other Target Areas Affected: Not targeted Associated Goals: ☒G1: Increase and Preserve Affordable Housing Choices ☐ G2: Community, Neighborhood, and Economic Development ☐ G3: Public Services Pa g e 7 0 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 56 Prompt Description Describe Basis for Relative Priority: The most recent CHAS estimates from 2020 indicate that 53 percent of Tri-Cities residents were housing cost burdened or severely housing cost burdened. Stakeholders and community members confirmed through consultation that the lack of accessible, affordable housing available in the Tri-Cities is a high priority, as detailed in the Needs Assessment and Market Analysis. Low vacancy rates, limited affordable housing developers, and a lack of accessible units in the region emphasize the need to preserve current affordable housing stock through rehabilitation. Pa g e 7 1 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 57 Table 14—Priority Need 2: Community and Economic Development Prompt Description Priority Level: High Description: Pasco will support investments in low-income communities to ensure access to thriving, connected, and inclusive communities by funding activities such as public facility rehabilitation, community development, infrastructure improvements, and other non-housing public services. Population Served: Income Level ☒ Extremely Low ☒ Low ☒ Moderate ☒ Middle Family Types ☒ Large Families ☒ Families with Children ☒ Elderly ☒ Public Housing Residents Homeless ☐ Rural ☐ Chronic Homelessness ☐ Individuals ☐ Families with Children ☐ Mentally Ill ☐ Chronic Substance Abuse ☐ Veterans ☐ Persons with HIV/AIDS ☐ Victims of Domestic Violence ☐ Unaccompanied Youth Pa g e 7 2 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 58 Prompt Description Population Served (Continued): Non-homeless Special Needs ☒ Elderly ☒ Frail Elderly ☒ Persons with Mental Disabilities ☒ Persons with Physical Disabilities ☒ Persons with Developmental Disabilities ☐ Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions ☐ Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families ☐ Victims of Domestic Violence ☒ Non-Housing Community Development ☐ Other Target Areas Affected: Not targeted Associated Goals: ☐ G1: Increase and Preserve Affordable Housing Choices ☒G2: Community, Neighborhood, and Economic Development ☐ G3: Public Services Describe Basis for Relative Priority: Stakeholders and community members noted during consultation sessions and surveys that there is a high demand for public services and facilities, particularly parks and recreation. As community buildings continue to age, there is a greater need for maintenance for these spaces. Additionally, stakeholders noted sidewalk improvements, particularly to increase ADA compliance and accessibility, are noted Consortium needs. Pa g e 7 3 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 59 Table 15—Priority Need 3: Public Services Prompt Description Priority Level: High Description: Pasco will support individuals and families by investing in housing and supportive services to increase self-sufficiency and well-being among low- and moderate-income households in Pasco. Population Served: Income Level ☒ Extremely Low ☒ Low ☒ Moderate ☐ Middle Family Types ☒ Large Families ☒ Families with Children ☒ Elderly ☒ Public Housing Residents Homeless ☐ Rural ☒ Chronic Homelessness ☒ Individuals ☒ Families with Children ☒ Mentally Ill ☒ Chronic Substance Abuse ☒ Veterans ☒ Persons with HIV/AIDS ☒ Victims of Domestic Violence ☒ Unaccompanied Youth Pa g e 7 4 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 60 Prompt Description Population Served (Continued): Non-homeless Special Needs ☒ Elderly ☒ Frail Elderly ☒ Persons with Mental Disabilities ☒ Persons with Physical Disabilities ☒ Persons with Developmental Disabilities ☒ Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions ☒ Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families ☒ Victims of Domestic Violence ☐ Non-Housing Community Development ☐ Other Target Areas Affected: Not targeted Associated Goals: ☐ G1: Increase and Preserve Affordable Housing Choices ☐ G2: Community, Neighborhood, and Economic Development ☒G3: Public Services Describe Basis for Relative Priority: Housing and supportive service providers noted through outreach efforts that the demand for services is higher than what organizations have the capacity to address. As housing costs continue to increase, the number of households requesting supportive services will likely increase as well. Pa g e 7 5 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 61 SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions - 91.415, 91.215(b) Influence of Market Conditions The SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions section of the Consolidated Plan describes the characteristics of the housing market as it relates to the Tri-Cities’ priority needs. Overall, as detailed in the Needs Assessment and Market Analysis, rising rents, low vacancy rates, and lack of affordable housing development have characterized the Tri-Cities housing market. As a result, many low- and moderate-income households live in unaffordable or substandard units. Table 16 outlines various market characteristics that influence affordable housing programs in the Tri-Cities. Table 16—Influence of Market Conditions Affordable Housing Type Market Characteristics That Will Influence the Use of Funds Available for Housing Type Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) Low vacancy rates and rising rents have increased the competition for affordable rental units, particularly among low-income renters. As a result, securing a rental unit in the private market can be a significant challenge. During consultation sessions, stakeholders noted that, because of increasing prices, service providers have a limited portfolio of housing options to offer clients. These factors will likely increase the need for TBRA. TBRA for Non-Homeless Special Needs Many of the same market constraints, including low vacancy rates and rising rents, that impact TBRA programs also impact rental assistance for special needs populations, including seniors, victims of gender-based violence, and people with disabilities. Data analysis indicated that, for instance, many households with at least one senior experience housing cost burden. For TBRA programs, a deeper subsidy level may be needed to serve vulnerable populations. New Unit Production Stakeholders noted in the consultation sessions that there are a limited number of affordable housing developers in the Tri-Cities. Stakeholders cite the lack of incentives and funding as primary reasons for the lack of affordable housing construction. In addition, for both new unit production and rehabilitation, the cost of labor in the area will increase slightly along with the cost of living as the area continues to grow in population and economic opportunities. This increased labor cost, coupled with the lack of affordable housing developers in the region, will impact the feasibility of certain projects and the quantity possible. Rehabilitation The Tri-Cities currently fund programs for housing repair and rehabilitation. In recent years, there continues to be a high demand for housing rehabilitation and repair assistance. Stakeholders note the need to repair public housing and assisted units. Page 76 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 62 Affordable Housing Type Market Characteristics That Will Influence the Use of Funds Available for Housing Type Acquisition, Including Preservation Stakeholders noted in the consultation sessions that there is limited land for development. The demand for housing and land in the region continues to increase, and this demand will drive prices upward. Page 77 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 63 SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.420(b), 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction The SP-35 Anticipated Resources section of the Consolidated Plan identifies the federal, state, local, and private resources expected to be available to Pasco to address the priority needs outlined in the Strategic Plan. The City of Pasco receives CDBG funds for use within the city in the approximate annual amount of $677,540. The Anticipated Resources table below describes this funding source. Anticipated Resources Table 17—Anticipated Resources: Pasco Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Remainder of ConPlan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ CDBG Public — Federal Acquisition Admin and Planning Economic Development Housing Public Improvements Public Services $677,540 n/a n/a $677,540 $3,387,700 CDBG funds leverage local, state, and federal funds. Agencies can combine funding sources in order to provide a wider range of services to the community. Pa g e 7 8 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 64 Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state, and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied. HOME and CDBG funds are important resources in the community and are used in conjunction with local, state, other federal, and private funds to support housing and other projects. Each of the cities is supportive of efforts by other organizations to obtain funding for projects to address the needs and goals outlined in this plan and in meeting the needs of the Tri-Cities. Cities also assist community organizations in strategizing, applying for, accessing, and developing new resources and partnerships. CDBG and HOME funds are frequently used to leverage local, state, and federal funds such as United Way, Washington State Housing Trust Funds, ESG, housing, and homeless funds generated by recording fees and county or city general funds. Each city, as a HOME Consortium participant, is required to match HOME funds. That match is met using city general funds or other non-federal funds and land made available at reduced costs (below appraised value) in the form of reduced financing fees from lenders and appraisers, grants for affordable housing from nonfederal sources, donated construction/housing materials, and volunteer labor. If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan. Not applicable. Pa g e 7 9 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 65 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure - 91.415, 91.215(k) Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its consolidated plan including private industry, non-profit organizations, and public institutions. The SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure section of the Consolidated Plan summarizes information gathered through stakeholder and community engagement and existing reports on the institutional delivery structure in the Tri-Cities. The institutional delivery structure includes entities that will carry out the objectives outlined in the Strategic Plan for CDBG. Table 18—Institutional Delivery Structure Responsible Entity Responsible Entity Type Role Geographic Area Served Pasco Government Economic Development Non-homeless Special Needs Ownership Planning Neighborhood Improvements Public Facilities Public Services Jurisdiction Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System Tri-Cities HOME and CDBG staff work with various nonprofit and governmental agencies during the planning, project proposal, and implementation stages of the programs. While the City of Richland is the lead entity, it relies heavily on the staff of the other two cities for support in the HOME program. Each city is responsible for all functions of its CDBG program. The following strengths, challenges, and gaps summarize key themes from outreach efforts as well as existing Tri-Cities plans, studies, and reports related to the Consortium’s institutional delivery structure. The following lists are not exhaustive but include strengths, challenges, and gaps as they relate to the Consolidated Plan. Strengths • Efficient collaboration between the three jurisdictions to administer HOME funds. • Strong local and regional partnerships to collaborate on programs and initiatives that benefit low- and moderate-income people and reduce administrative burden. Challenges • Limited capacity among housing and human services providers to meet the needs of the community. • Limited funding for service providers to hire and retain qualified staff. Page 80 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 66 • Limited affordable housing developers in the region. • Private sector housing options, which used to serve as part of service providers’ portfolios, are becoming too expensive or unavailable to utilize. • Housing voucher waitlists rarely open or close within days due to high demand. • The ending of the Treasury Rental Assistance Program and state-funded Eviction Rental Assistance Program left a gap in resources. Gaps • Lack of transitional housing options. • Need for low-barrier shelter options. • Limited shelter options for men and adolescent boys means families may have to separate across shelters. • Need to expand language options for housing and human services providers, particularly Ukrainian, Burmese, and Spanish. Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services. The Consortium direct public service funding to services for people experiencing homelessness or who are at risk of experiencing homelessness. There are no known providers in the Tri- Cities that provide homeless prevention services targeted to people with HIV or AIDS. Table 19.1—Homeless Prevention Services Summary (Homelessness Prevention Services) Homelessness Prevention Services Available in the Community Targeted to Homeless Targeted to People with HIV Counseling/Advocacy YES YES NO Legal Assistance YES YES NO Mortgage Assistance YES NO NO Rental Assistance YES YES NO Utilities Assistance YES NO NO Table 19.2—Homeless Prevention Services Summary (Street Outreach Services) Homelessness Prevention Services Available in the Community Targeted to Homeless Targeted to People with HIV Law Enforcement NO NO NO Mobile Clinics NO NO NO Other Street Outreach Services YES YES NO Page 81 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 67 Table 19.3—Homeless Prevention Services Summary (Supportive Services) Homelessness Prevention Services Available in the Community Targeted to Homeless Targeted to People with HIV Alcohol & Drug Abuse YES YES NO Child Care YES YES NO Education YES YES NO Employment and Employment Training YES YES NO Health Care YES YES NO HIV/AIDS YES YES NO Life Skills YES YES NO Mental Health Counseling YES YES NO Transportation YES YES NO Table 19.4—Homeless Prevention Services Summary (Other) Homelessness Prevention Services Available in the Community Targeted to Homeless Targeted to People with HIV Other NO NO NO Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth). The Benton Franklin CoC operates the Housing Resource Center, which serves as the Coordinated Entry point for the Tri-Cities. As outlined in the Benton & Franklin Counties Five-Year Plan to End Homelessness (2020–2025), the Housing Resource Center is designed to allow anyone in need of assistance to be assessed in a standard and consistent manner. Upon assessment, the Housing Resource Center prioritizes households based on need. People who are chronic homeless, fleeing violence, unsheltered homeless, sheltered homeless, and veterans, among others, comprise the highest need. Households are then referred to the appropriate programs among the network of homeless services in the two counties. As stated in this section, there are strong, inter-organizational partnerships in the Tri-Cities that coordinate to address the needs of people experiencing homelessness. Page 82 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 68 Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above. Listed below are the strengths and gaps identified by stakeholders during outreach efforts and in existing Tri-Cities plans and reports regarding the service delivery system for special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness. Strengths • The Housing Resource Center serves as an accessible vehicle by which households can obtain services. • Consistent use of a prioritization tool promotes fair and equitable access to services. • The County Human Services Department employs a regular outreach team to people experiencing homelessness in the community. • The CoC runs internal programs to fill gaps in the housing system. Gaps • There is a lack of transitional housing options. • Need for more low-barrier shelter options and options for various family types. • The demand for services is higher than what most providers have the capacity to accommodate. Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs. Pasco will continue to participate in cross-jurisdictional efforts to improve the institutional structure and reduce gaps in the service system. This includes participation in the Benton Franklin CoC and Benton and Franklin Counties Department of Human Services, involvement with housing authorities, and continued efforts to foster cooperation and focused coordination of funding and administrative efforts. Additionally, the Benton & Franklin Counties Five-Year Plan to End Homelessness (2020–2025) includes five objectives to improve system delivery and reduce homelessness in the community. They are: • Quickly identify and engage people experiencing homelessness under the state definition, and all unaccompanied youth under any federal definition, through outreach and coordination between every system that encounters people experiencing homelessness. • Prioritization of homeless housing for people with the highest needs. • Operate an effective and efficient homeless crisis response housing system that swiftly moves people into stable housing. • Projection of the impact of the fully implemented local plans on the number of households housed and the number of households left unsheltered, assuming existing resources and state policies. • Address racial disparities among people experiencing homelessness. Page 83 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 69 SP-45 Goals - 91.415, 91.215(a)(4) The SP-45 Goals section of the Consolidated Plan summarizes the priorities and specific goals Pasco will set for the next five funding years. Goals Summary Information Table 20—Goal 1: Affordable Housing Choice Prompt Description Description: Pasco will work to preserve and expand the supply of affordable housing by funding activities such as homeowner and rental rehabilitation. Additionally, Pasco will support housing code enforcement to aid low- and moderate-income households in maintaining safe and decent housing. Category: ☒ Affordable Housing ☐ Public Housing ☐ Homeless ☐ Non-Homeless Special Needs ☐ Non-Housing Community Development ☐ Other: Start Year: 2025 End Year: 2029 Outcome: ☒ Availability/Accessibility ☒ Affordability ☐ Sustainability Objective: ☐ Create Suitable Living Environments ☒ Provide Decent Affordable Housing ☐ Create Economic Opportunities Geographic Areas Included: None Priority Needs Addressed: ☒ PN-1: Affordable Housing Choice ☐ PN-2: Community and Economic Development ☐ PN-3: Public Services Funding Allocated: CDBG: $1,693,850 Goal Outcome Indicator: Homeowner Housing Rehabilitated: 25 housing units Rental Units Rehabilitated: 2 housing units Housing Code Enforcement/Foreclosed Property Care: 2,500 households assisted Page 84 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 70 Table 21—Goal 2: Community, Neighborhood, and Economic Development Prompt Description Description: Pasco will support investments in low-income communities to ensure access to thriving, connected, and inclusive communities by funding activities such as public facility rehabilitation, community development, infrastructure improvements, and other non- housing public services. Category: ☐ Affordable Housing ☐ Public Housing ☐ Homeless ☐ Non-Homeless Special Needs ☒ Non-Housing Community Development ☐ Other: Start Year: 2025 End Year: 2029 Outcome: ☐ Availability/Accessibility ☐ Affordability ☒ Sustainability Objective: ☒ Create Suitable Living Environments ☐ Provide Decent Affordable Housing ☐ Create Economic Opportunities Geographic Areas Included: None Priority Needs Addressed: ☐ PN-1: Affordable Housing Choice ☒ PN-2: Community and Economic Development ☐ PN-3: Public Services Funding Allocated: CDBG: $1,693,850 Goal Outcome Indicator: Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities other than Low- and Moderate-Income Housing: 53,800 persons assisted Façade Treatment/Business-Building Rehabilitation: 10 businesses Jobs Created/Retained: 75 jobs Page 85 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 71 Table 22—Goal 3: Public Services Prompt Description Description: Pasco will support individuals and families by investing in housing and supportive services to increase self-sufficiency and well-being among low and moderate-income households in Pasco. Category: ☐ Affordable Housing ☐ Public Housing ☐ Homeless ☒ Non-Homeless Special Needs ☐ Non-Housing Community Development ☐ Other: Start Year: 2025 End Year: 2029 Outcome: ☒ Availability/Accessibility ☐ Affordability ☐ Sustainability Objective: ☒ Create Suitable Living Environments ☐ Provide Decent Affordable Housing ☐ Create Economic Opportunities Geographic Areas Included: None Priority Needs Addressed: ☐ PN-1: Affordable Housing Choice ☐ PN-2: Community and Economic Development ☒ PN-3: Public Services Funding Allocated: CDBG: $0 Goal Outcome Indicator: Public Services other than Low- and Moderate-Income Housing: 25 persons assisted Page 86 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 72 Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2). An estimated one household will be assisted in the 2025 program year in the HOME homebuyer assistance program. Thirty households from Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland will be served with the TBRA program. Two homeowner rehabilitation programs are targeted for the 2025 program year. Page 87 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 73 SP-65 Lead-based Paint Hazards - 91.415, 91.215(i) The SP-65 Lead-based Paint Hazards section of the Consolidated Plan describes the actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards. A substantial share of housing in each of the three cities is older and more at risk of having lead paint hazards, which is particularly true of older units in poor maintenance, such as those in lower-income neighborhoods. Each city will continue to create community awareness as an important component of reducing lead hazards. Education efforts focus on actions to take when rehabilitating or remodeling a home and steps to take if exposure to lead hazards is suspected. Each city will make those materials easily available in pamphlet form, via available links on websites, and in planning and building departments. All materials may be made available in several languages. The cities actively promote safe work practices and information for residents and contractors. How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards? Information is made available to the community, being distributed to all city contractors and planning and building departments. Applicants for down-payment assistance programs and housing renovation are provided the materials and given counseling on lead-safe practices and hazards. How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures? The cities use LBP Safe Checklists to evaluate the applicability of the lead safe housing rule to projects funded with CDBG and HOME funds. The cities work with approved contractors to perform testing to identify LBP hazards and will assure compliance after remediation work through risk assessments and clearance exams. Page 88 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 74 SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy - 91.415, 91.215(j) The SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy section of the Consolidated Plan describes the actions taken to reduce poverty. Jurisdiction Goals, Programs, and Policies for Reducing the Number of Poverty- Level Families Each of the three Consolidated Plan goals has the aim to reduce the number of households in poverty, in addition to providing relief from the financial burdens of poverty. The goal to increase and preserve affordable housing choices (particularly rental housing) will remove some of the burden of cost, increase housing safety, and result in housing stability for some Tri-Cities households. Assisting households in meeting their housing needs often frees up that household to focus energy and resources on job skills, work opportunities, and educational opportunities. To the extent physical environments are improved, streets and roads are made safer and more amenable to multiple modes of transportation, and people feel safer on their streets and downtown, the community is more attractive to new residents and new businesses/workers. The three cities will continue to explore ways to use CDBG funds to support programs that help employ persons in poverty, such as the Pasco Specialty Kitchen, and to invest in training and support for new and existing businesses that provide quality jobs to the region. Supportive services offer the opportunity to make choices about self-sufficiency and a way out of poverty and the contributing circumstances (e.g., domestic violence, mental illness, loss of employment, illness). How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan? The Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan focuses on meeting the needs of lower-income people and neighborhoods. The Consortium will use HOME and CDBG funds to support low- and moderate-income families while supporting broader community-wide strategies to increase self-sufficiency and economic opportunities. The CDBG program staff are active participants in CoC meetings, where needs, resources, and strategies are regularly discussed and coordinated. Each of the three cities has its own Comprehensive Plan, and each of those plans considers the cities as part of the region. Both Benton and Franklin counties continue to expand their housing, behavioral health, and supportive service systems. Notably, this includes continued work on the Coordinated Entry System that increases efficiencies and outcomes of the CoC in the region. Pasco will continue to coordinate with the Housing Authority of the City of Pasco and Franklin County to support opportunities to expand voucher programs and maintain capacity to assist lowest-income households. Over the years, a close, cooperative relationship between the Benton Franklin Community Action Committee allows the cities to support a coordinated effort to reduce burdens for those living in poverty. Page 89 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 75 SP-80 Monitoring - 91.230 The SP-80 Monitoring section of the Consolidated Plan describes the standards and procedures the Tri- Cities will use to monitor its housing and community development projects. Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements. The City of Richland is responsible for monitoring Richland CDBG and HOME Consortium program subrecipients. The Cities of Kennewick and Pasco are responsible for their respective CDBG program subrecipients. All are responsible for ensuring compliance with all federal, state, and local rules, regulations, and laws. Monitoring is accomplished through on-site monitoring, desk monitoring, written correspondence, and phone conversations. Technical assistance is offered throughout the year, both to new sub-recipients and existing subrecipients. Subrecipients are required to provide written quarterly reports to identify progress made in the program and how funds have been used. Housing projects funded by CDBG or HOME programs are typically made as loans documented by recorded deeds of trust, promissory notes, and other contractual loan agreements. These documents establish the obligations for compliance with CDBG or HOME regulations. All housing projects are required to secure building permits and comply with zoning and building code requirements. Housing units are inspected, and corrections are required to meet building codes as part of the permitting process. HOME-funded projects to purchase existing units receive an on-site housing quality standards inspection and visual paint inspection. Specific language is in the written contractual agreement and Deeds of Trust to ensure the assisted unit complies with affordability requirements. A performance measurement system to determine the impact federal dollars are making in the community assists in monitoring program and subrecipient performance. These actions identify potential areas of concern and assist in making necessary changes to ensure programs operate efficiently and effectively. The cities do not monitor grants or loans awarded directly to other entities by HUD or other federal or non-federal agencies. Page 90 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 76 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AP-15 Expected Resources - 91.420(b), 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction The Annual Action Plan is comprised of six sections: • Expected Resources • Annual Goals and Objectives • Projects • Geographic Distribution • Other Actions • Program Specific Requirements Together, these sections guide the investment of federal housing and community development funds for the program year operating from January 1 to December 31, 2025. As a recipient of federal funding from HUD, Pasco receives an annual entitlement, or formula grant, from the CDBG. Pasco received the following grant amount for the 2025 program year period. • CDBG: $677,540. As each of the three cities shares a common set of goals and directions for meeting the community development and affordable housing needs of lower-income persons, Pasco intends to use these funds to further the three primary goals listed in the Consortium’s 2025–2029 Consolidated Plan which include: • Affordable housing choice. • Community and economic development. • Public services. Pa g e 9 1 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 77 Anticipated Resources Table 23—Expected Resources—Priority Table Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Remainder of Con Plan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ CDBG Public — federal Acquisition Admin and Planning Economic Development Housing Public Improvements Public Services $677,540 $0 $0 $677,540 $2,710,160 Fiscal year 2025 allocation amount Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state, and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied. CDBG and HOME funds are important resources in the community and are used in conjunction with local, state, other federal, and private funds to support housing and other projects. Each of the cities is supportive of efforts by other organizations to obtain funding for projects to address the needs and goals outlined in this plan and to meet the needs of the Tri-Cities. Cities also assist community organizations in strategizing, applying for, accessing, and developing new resources and partnerships. CDBG and HOME funds are frequently used to leverage local, state, and federal funds such as United Way, Washington State Housing Trust Funds, ESG, and housing and homeless funds generated by recording fees and county or city general funds. Each city, as a HOME Consortium participant, is required to match HOME funds. That match is met using city general funds or other non-federal funds and land made available at a reduced cost (below appraised value) in the form of reduced financing fees from lenders and appraisers, grants for affordable housing from nonfederal sources, donated construction/housing materials, and volunteer labor. Pa g e 9 2 o f 2 6 9 If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan. Not applicable. Pasco Consolidated Plan | 78 Page 93 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 79 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.420, 91.220(c)(3) &(e) The AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives section of the Consolidated Plan summarizes the specific goals and actions Pasco will undertake during the program year. Pasco has identified the following three goals to guide its CDBG funding over the next year. Goals Summary Information Table 24—Goals Summary Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 1 Increase and preserve affordable housing choices 2025 2029 Affordable Housing N/A Affordable Housing Choice CDBG: $195,000 Homeowner housing rehabilitated: 5 housing units Rental units rehabilitated: 1 housing unit Housing code enforcement/foreclosed property care: 500 housing units 2 Community, neighborhood, & economic development 2025 2029 Non-Housing Community Development N/A Community & Economic Development CDBG: $347,540 Public facility or infrastructure activities other than low- /moderate-income housing benefit: 10,760 people assisted Facade treatment/business- building rehabilitation: 2 businesses Jobs created/retained: 15 jobs 3 Public Services 2025 2029 Public Services N/A Public Services CDBG: $0 Public service activities other than low-/moderate-income housing benefit: 5 persons assisted Pa g e 9 4 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 80 Goal Descriptions Table 25—Goal Names and Descriptions Goal Name Goal Description Increase and preserve affordable housing choices Pasco will work to preserve and expand the supply of affordable housing by funding activities such as homeowner and rental rehab. Additionally, Pasco will support housing code enforcement to aid low- and moderate-income households in maintaining safe and decent housing. Community, neighborhood & economic development Pasco will support investments in low-income communities to ensure access to thriving, connected, and inclusive communities by funding activities such as public facility rehabilitation, community development, infrastructure improvements, and other non-housing public services. Public Services Pasco will support individuals and families at risk of homelessness or experiencing homelessness by investing in housing and supportive services to increase self-sufficiency and wellbeing among low- and moderate-income households in Pasco. Pa g e 9 5 o f 2 6 9 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 81 AP-35 Projects - 91.420, 91.220(d) Introduction The AP-35 Projects section of the Consolidated Plan describes how funds will be used to support the goals and priorities identified in previous sections of this Consolidated Plan. Projects and activities are carefully chosen. CDBG activities go through a competitive process, ensuring the maximum effectiveness in the use of federal grant funds. Table 26—Project Information # Project Name 1 Program Administration 2 Public Services 3 Economic Opportunities 4 Decent Housing 5 Community Infrastructure 6 Section 108 Guaranteed Loan Program Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs. Funding priorities are consistent with those stated in the Strategic Plan. The City of Pasco intends to maximize the use of limited resources to ensure the highest benefit within the capacity to administer the program. Given the significant increase in housing needs, including the lack of accessible housing units, the City of Pasco will prioritize rehabilitation efforts in the community. High priority is also placed on projects that would enhance the economic opportunities of residents. Whenever feasible, projects that leverage additional funds or are coordinated with community partners are emphasized and given priority. The city does not anticipate obstacles to meeting the underserved needs addressed in the projects. Page 96 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 82 AP-35 Project Summary The AP-35 Project Summary provides greater detail into the specific projects the Consortium will undertake in FY2025. Project Summary Information Table 27—Project Information # Project Information Details 1 Project Name: Program Administration 1 Target Area: N/A 1 Goals Supported: Increase and Preserve Affordable Housing Choice Community, Neighborhood, and Economic Development Homeless Intervention and Public Services 1 Needs Addressed: Affordable Housing Choice Community and Economic Development Public Services 1 Funding: CDBG: $135,000 1 Description: Fund necessary for staff to administer, manage, and monitor the implementation of CDBG funds and associated federal regulations. Administration funding will include 20 percent of eligible program income. 1 Target Date: 12/31/2025 1 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities: N/A 1 Location Description: 525 N. 3rd Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 1 Planned Activities: CDBG funding will be provided to support administration, management, and monitoring. Responsibilities include, but are not limited to, activity eligibility determination, fund management, labor standards enforcement, and environmental review. Policy leadership and back-office infrastructure are also included. 2 Project Name: Public Services 2 Target Area: N/A 2 Goals Supported: Public Services 2 Needs Addressed: Public Services Page 97 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 83 # Project Information Details 2 Funding: CDBG: $0 2 Description: Public Service-funded activities to carry out opportunities for low-income clientele, including City staff costs for program delivery. 2 Target Date: 12/31/2025 2 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities: 5 2 Location Description: 205 S Wehe Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 (Martin Luther King Center) 2 Planned Activities: 3 Project Name: Economic Opportunities 3 Target Area: N/A 3 Goals Supported: Community, Neighborhood, and Economic Development 3 Needs Addressed: Community and Economic Development 3 Funding: Increase and Preserve Affordable Housing Choice 3 Description: Replacement of Equipment 3 Target Date: CDBG: $49,180 3 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities: 15 jobs 3 Location Description: 110 S 4th Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 (Pasco Specialty Kitchen) 3 Planned Activities: CDBG funds will provide for the replacement of kitchen equipment to help ensure that the clients at the Pasco Specialty Kitchen can continue to create jobs and services for the public. 4 Project Name: Decent Housing 4 Target Area: N/A 4 Goals Supported: Increase and Preserve Affordable Housing Choice 4 Needs Addressed: Affordable Housing Choice 4 Funding: CDBG: $195,000 4 Description: Complete owner- and renter-occupied rehabilitation projects and support code enforcement. 4 Target Date: 12/31/2025 4 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities: 506 Page 98 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 84 # Project Information Details 4 Location Description: Scattered 4 Planned Activities: Provide minor rehabilitation, emergency repairs, and remodels for very low- to low-income households. In addition, CDBG funds provide a portion of the salary and benefits for one-and-a-half of three code enforcement officers to help bring properties into compliance with codes. 5 Project Name: Community Infrastructure 5 Target Area: N/A 5 Goals Supported: Community, Neighborhood, and Economic Development 5 Needs Addressed: Community and Economic Development 5 Funding: CDBG: $48,360 5 Description: Expand or improve community infrastructure in lower-income neighborhoods while minimizing costs to households below 80 percent AMI. Additionally, CDBG funds will be used to complete façade treatment/business building rehabilitation projects. 5 Target Date: 12/31/2025 5 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities: 12,000 persons assisted 5 Location Description: TBD 5 Planned Activities: Activities include public facility improvement to neighborhoods and parks and façade and business building rehabilitation, including staff costs for project delivery. 6 Project Name: Section 108 Guaranteed Loan Program 6 Target Area: N/A 6 Goals Supported: Community, Neighborhood, and Economic Development 6 Needs Addressed: Community and Economic Development 6 Funding: CDBG: $250,000 6 Description: Section 108 Guaranteed Loan Program debt service. 6 Target Date: 12/31/2025 6 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities: N/A 6 Location Description: 525 N. 3rd Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 Page 99 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 85 # Project Information Details 6 Planned Activities: Annual debt payment for Section 108 loan Page 100 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 86 AP-50 Geographic Distribution - 91.420, 91.220(f) The AP-50 Geographic Distribution section of the Consolidated Plan identifies geographic target areas for CDBG funds. Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low- income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed. No specific geographic target areas have been identified. Pasco’s CDBG funds will be available to assist lower-income residents within Pasco city limits with priority placed on those activities that provide a benefit in the oldest neighborhoods of Pasco. Geographic Distribution Table 28—Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of Funds N/A N/A Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically N/A. Page 101 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 87 AP-85 OTHER ACTIONS - 91.420, 91.220(K) Introduction The AP-85 Other Actions section of the Consolidated Plan describes the actions Pasco will take to meet the needs of low- and moderate-income households in the Tri-Cities. One of the challenges to meeting underserved needs by any one group is the lack of staff capacity, financial resources, and supportive services necessary to address all needs. All three cities attend, support, and are active members of the Benton Franklin CoC, an organization comprised of local non-profit, housing, public service, correctional, and government agencies throughout Benton and Franklin counties. The CoC uses a Coordinated Entry System that is fully implemented and aims to create efficiencies in the service provider network by not duplicating services and matching those in need of services to those organizations most suited to meet those needs. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. Decent housing can be made available to those below the 30 percent median income by joining forces with community advocates such as the Benton Franklin Home Base Housing Network, Benton Franklin Community Action Committee, and the Department of Human Services to provide affordable housing for this underserved population. Typical projects to meet this goal would be family shelters, domestic violence shelters, developmentally disabled and chronically mentally disabled housing, elderly housing, migrant farmworker housing, homeless prevention rapid rehousing programs, and state and local housing trust funds. The city supports the efforts of local non-profit agencies to meet the needs of underserved populations. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing. The City will continue to support the efforts of various nonprofit agencies, housing authorities, and Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs) to provide affordable housing opportunities for special needs populations through CDBG funds. Rehabilitation priority is given by the city and by the Benton Franklin Community Action Committee’s Energy-Efficient Healthy House Program to those homes occupied by frail elderly or homeowners and renters with disabilities. City staff will be available to help identify potential funding sources and provide technical assistance within staff capacity and will remain receptive to forming partnerships with other entities to ensure vulnerable populations can reside in decent, safe housing. Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards. The city will provide education on LBP, including information on Safe Work Practices, actions to take when rehabbing or remodeling a home, and steps to take if exposure to lead hazards is suspected. The pamphlets “Renovate Right” and “Protect Your Family from Lead in Your Home” published by the Washington Department of Commerce and Environmental Protection Agency will be distributed to all potential housing clients and be available via online links from the City’s website. In compliance with Program Update 05-11, the LBP Safe Checklist is utilized to evaluate the applicability of the lead safe housing rule to CDBG- and HOME-funded projects. The City will work with pre-qualified contractors to perform testing as necessary to identify lead hazards and ensure compliance after remediation work through clearance exams as required for persons assisted with CDBG or HOME funds. Page 102 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 88 Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families. The activities outlined in this plan will work to increase economic opportunities in the Tri-Cities area. Through working with local businesses and creating needed infrastructure and facilities updates or maintenance, the cities are working to increase the number of opportunities for financial security in the area. Also, each City funds public services that increase capacity for local non-profit service organizations that work directly with low-income households with the aims of first creating stability and then working to identify opportunities to transition out of poverty. Actions planned to develop institutional structure. The city will pursue various activities outlined in the 2025–2029 Consolidated Plan to strengthen and coordinate actions with housing, nonprofit, and economic development agencies. Staff will continue to participate in the CoC Task Force to assist in the coordination of government agencies, nonprofit organizations, housing developers, social service providers, and CoC providers to meet the needs of homeless individuals and families. Pasco staff will participate in the Point-in-Time count, used to measure community trends and shifts that are impacting those individuals and families experiencing homelessness. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. The city supports efforts by agencies to apply for or leverage other funding sources that might become available during the year. City staff will be available to provide some technical assistance support of projects that meet a housing and community development need as identified in the 2020–2024 Consolidated Plan and will assist organizations in applying for funds from other local, state, or federal resources within staff capacity. Discussion Page 103 of 269 Pasco Consolidated Plan | 89 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements - 91.420, 91.220(l)(1,2,4) Introduction Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table in the AP-35 Project Summary section of the Annual Action Plan. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. Program Income Amount 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed. $50,000 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements. 0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan. 0 5. The amount of income from float-funded activities. 0 Total Program Income. $50,000 Other CDBG Requirements Requirement Amount 1. The amount of urgent need activities. N/A 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall benefit—A consecutive period of one, two, or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70 percent of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100% Page 104 of 269 Resolution – 2025-2029 Tri-Cities HOME Consortium Consolidated Plan & 2025 Annual Action Plan RESOLUTION NO. _________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE 2025-2029 TRI-CITIES HOME CONSORTIUM CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND THE 2025 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN WHEREAS, the Tri-Cities HOME Consortium member cities, Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland “Consortium”, contracted with The Cloudburst Group, “Consultant”, to prepare the Consolidated Plan for the program years 2025 through 2029 which includes a detailed Strategic Plan developed from a needs assessment, and the 2025 Annual Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the Tri-Cities HOME Consortium has complied with applicable laws and regulations at all stages of the development of the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, including conducting two public hearings to obtain citizen comments, publishing notices regarding the draft 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, and accepting public comment, for no less than the required 30-day period; and WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council approved the 2025 Work Plan and Allocations by Resolution No. 4499 on October 7, 2024. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the Pasco City Council hereby approves the 2025-2029 Tri-Cities HOME Consortium Consolidated Plan (Exhibit A) and the 2025 Annual Action Plan (Exhibit B). Be It Further Resolved, that the Interim City Manager, or authorized designee, is authorized to execute all agreements in accordance with the Five-Year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan Supplements previously approved by Council; and to make minor substantive changes as necessary to execute the Plans. Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution shall take effect immediately. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____, 2025. _____________________________ Pete Serrano Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorneys Page 105 of 269 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 19, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 2/24/25 FROM: Ken Roske, Police Chief Police Department SUBJECT: DKS Associates Red Light Cameras Study Phase 3 Presentation & Resolution Red for Mobility Verra - Agreement 5-Year Light with Cameras (10 minutes staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Evaluation Memorandum Presentation Resolution Professional Services Agreement II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presentation - Aaron Berger, of DKS Associates, will report on the detailed analysis, findings and recommendations regarding the Automated Traffic Safety Camera program. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue & expenses are expected to remain consistent with previous contract. 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Revenue $267,965 $571,467 $520,556 $508,610 $472,870 $2,341,468 Expenses $224,144 $242,428 $433,438 $369,237 $385,278 $1,654,526 Revenue in excess of program expenses are used to fund street safety improvements. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: City of Pasco implemented automated photo enforcement at N 20th Avenue & W Court Street and N Road 68 & Burden Boulevard in April of 2019 due to history of frequent traffic crashed in those intersection. The program aims to reduce the frequency of red-light running events and Page 106 of 269 related crashes that result in personal injury, such as angle or left-turn crashes. Two prior studies conducted by DKS Associates assessed the program’s effectiveness: 1. Phase One (September 2019 – June 2020): Found a reduction in red- light running and crash frequency within four months of ticket issuance. The study recommended further analysis once more data became available, as traffic changes from the COVID-19 pandemic influenced this initial evaluation. 2. Phase Two (January 2020 – December 2021): Identified an overall improvement in safety, with a clear downward trend in crash frequency at both intersections. However, red-light running frequency showed mixed results, varying by location and direction of travel. years five effectiveness program’s after evaluates study latest This the implementation to inform City Council and staff on program effectiveness and explore potential benefits at other signalized intersections in the City of Pasco. V. DISCUSSION: The current evaluation by DKS Associates provides updated findings:  Red-light running frequency initially declined but has plateaued: Patterns show a reduction during the initial implementation, leveling off after approximately two years.  The highest rate of violations occur on Fridays: Statistically significant data highlights a trend of increased red-light running on Fridays.  Safety has improved: Before-and-after crash data indicates a significant reduction in crash frequency at both intersections. The evaluation also identified signalized intersections within Pasco with the highest potential for safety improvement through red-light cameras. The study’s findings and whether determine decisions to future guide aim program expansion to additional intersections would be beneficial in terms of safety. Aaron Berger of DKS Associates will discuss the study approach and detailed findings during the City Council meeting. Verra Mobility, the provider of automated cameras, has been operating under a month-to-month agreement since their exclusive contract expired in May 2024 while study the As conducted. safety study traffic a demonstrates was improved safety attributed to the red-light safety camera program, staff is proposing a new five-year agreement. Page 107 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 1 CITY OF PASCO RED-LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION: PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: December 11, 2024 TO: Jeff Harpster | City of Pasco FROM: Aaron Berger, PE, Harshala Sardar, PE and Brianna Velasquez, EIT | DKS Associates SUBJECT: Red-Light Running Cameras Evaluation: Phase 3 Technical Memorandum Project #24880-000 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A history of intersection traffic crashes at the N 20th Avenue & W Court Street and N Road 68 & Burden Boulevard intersections prompted the City of Pasco to install automated photo enforcement at these locations in April 2019; warnings to vehicles were issued through August 2019, then the system began issuing traffic tickets thereafter. The purpose of the automated photo enforcement program is to change driver behavior and improve safety at these locations. The measure of effectiveness is a reduction in the frequency of red-light running events and related crashes that can lead to personal injury such as angle crashes or left-turn crashes. No other infrastructure improvements or traffic safety mitigation measures have been implemented during the study period. DKS Associates conducted two previous phases of this study to assess the effects of implementing the enforcement program, attached as Appendix A and B respectively. Phase one was the initial evaluation which used limited data from September 2019 to June 2020 and found red-light running reduced four months after the program started issuing tickets. While the frequency of crashes reduced during this period, the study recommended that a future safety analysis be conducted as more information becomes available. In addition, the data supporting this effort was impacted by traffic changes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. The second phase of the study had an after-study period from January 2020 to December 2021. The evaluation of additional data found that safety had improved overall; before-and-after data indicated a clear downward trend in crash frequency at both intersections. However, red-light running frequency had mixed results at this stage. Red light running patterns slightly reduced, increased, or remained stagnant, depending on location and direction of travel with the addition of the automated enforcement system. In this latest phase of the study, the objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of the automated photo enforcement program at these two locations five years after its implementation to support City staff and Council decisions regarding the program. Page 108 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 2 In addition, changes in crash data trends identified at the red-light camera intersections were used to evaluate and identify other signalized intersections within the City of Pasco that might experience the highest potential safety benefit from red-light cameras. The evaluation resulted in these findings related to the effect of the automated photo enforcement program at the study intersections: • Red-light running frequency has seen an initial decline but has now plateaued: With the addition of the automated enforcement system, red light running patterns initially reduced, then leveled off after about two years of implementation. • Fridays have the highest incidence of red-light running: While the reasons for this trend are not immediately clear, there is statistically significant data showing that Fridays include more violations. • Safety has improved. Before-and-after data indicate a clear reduction in crash frequency at both intersections. INTRODUCTION This memorandum provides an update on the before-and-after analysis of the effectiveness of red- light running cameras that were installed in 2019 at the following two intersections: • Road 68 and Burden Boulevard • 20th Avenue and Court Street The following sections detail the red-light running frequency trends and the before-and-after crash history at the two intersections. N ROAD 68 & BURDEN BOULEVARD Road 68 serves as a primary main north-south principal arterial, joining the City of Pasco north and south of I-182. As one of the limited connections to and across I-182, Road 68 is one of the busiest arterials in the City. North of Interstate 182 (I-182), Road 68 is currently classified as a minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour (MPH), but the City plans to update its classification to principal arterial by year 2038.1 Burden Boulevard is a key east-west minor arterial corridor, connecting retail land uses, large neighborhoods, and the HAPO recreational center to Road 68. The intersection at Road 68 and Burden Boulevard is at the center of one of the City’s larger retail business districts.2 The north leg has five lanes, while the south leg has seven lanes, of which five serve the northbound traffic. 1 Pasco Comprehensive Plan, Future 2038 Street Functional Classification System Map, Aug. 2020. 2 City of Pasco interactive Parcels, Zoning, and Lane Use Viewer, accessed by DKS Associates July 2024. Page 109 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 3 The automated photo enforcement cameras are placed along Road 68. All automated photo enforcement program data for the northbound and southbound approaches of N Road 68 & Burden Boulevard came from Redflex Alcyon reports. Data was compiled for: • September 2019 to December 2019 (Phase 1 Study) • January 2020 to March 2022 (Phase 2 Study) • April 2022 to July 2024 (new data obtained for this Phase 3 Study) To provide clear comparisons between months and years, this data was combined into September 2019 through July 2024. The violation data from the northbound and southbound approach cameras is presented in the following sections. N ORTHBOUND RED-LIGHT RUNNING VIOLATIONS A total of 4,919 citations were issued to northbound drivers from September 2019 to 2024. This data is displayed by month in Figure 1. FIGURE 1 : ROAD 68 & BURDEN BLVD: NB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS (2019-2024) BY MONTH The year 2021 had 1,221 citations, the highest number yearly total to date. Early summer and fall months have more citations compared to other months, likely due to heavier traffic demand on Road 68 during these months, which also include heavy agricultural activity north and frequent events at the HAPO center to the east. Average citations per month declined from 97 in 2020 to 52 in 2024, with the biggest drop occurring from 2022 to 2023. RedFlex inspected the camera and noted multiple equipment issues likely to be causing the drop in citations. RedFlex has since implemented fixes and changes to the camera and supporting computer, and citations are anticipated to climb back to the 2020 through 2022 trend. The February 2022 drop in citations is likely due to lack of officer availability to approve incidents. Figure 2 presents summary of citation from 2019 to 2024 by weekday. Page 110 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 4 FIGURE 2 : ROAD 68 & BURDEN BLVD: NB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS (2019-2024) BY WEEKDAY Red-light running violations remain consistent throughout the week, with a moderate increase on Fridays and Saturdays. The Friday and Saturday higher citations are likely due to more unfamiliar drivers using Road 68 on these days. Sundays are the lowest citation days, likely due to lower traffic demand. Figure 3 summarizes the citations by hour of the day. F IGURE 3 : ROAD 68 & BURDEN BLVD: NB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS (2019-2024) BY HOUR Page 111 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 5 The time-of-day numbers indicate less citation occurrences during the morning peak period, particularly when compared against the afternoon (school peak) and evening peak periods. SOUTHBOUND RD 68 RED-LIGHT RUNNING VIOLATIONS There were 7,625 citations issued from Sept 2019 to July 2024 at the southbound approach of Road 68 and Burden Blvd intersection. Figure 4 presents summary of citations issued by month. FIGURE 4: ROAD 68 & BURDEN BLVD: SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS (2019-2024) BY MONTH The year 2021 has the highest citations at 1,736, with a gradual decrease to 1,072 in 2023. The rolling average of citations per month has decreased from over 180 to around 100, with the total citations plateauing over the last two years. The data does appear to contain a couple anomalies, with February 2022 and February 2023 showing much lower than expected citations, most likely due to lack of officer availability to approve incidents. Figure 5 presents the redlight running violation by weekday. FIGURE 5 : ROAD 68 & BURDEN BLVD: SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS (2019 – 2024) BY WEEKDAY Page 112 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 6 Similar to the northbound Road 68 camera, citations tend to be lower on Sundays and peak on Fridays and Saturdays, likely due to lower volumes (Sundays) and more unfamiliar drivers (Fridays and Saturdays). Figure 6 presents summary of citation by hour of the day. FIGURE 6 : ROAD 68 & BURDEN BLVD: SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CIATIONS (2019 – 2024) BY HOUR While the overall diurnal citation trend is similar to the northbound camera, the noon hour shows a clear highest citation occurrence. This may be due to drivers hurrying back to work during the lunch hour, as southbound Road 68 generally connects both residential and shopping/service trips to more centralized primary employment locations. Overall, southbound citations are higher than northbound, despite northbound traffic demand exceeding southbound by nearly 50%. This indicates even higher red light running incidences for southbound traffic, likely driven by increased higher southbound congestion and resulting driver frustration. N RD 68 & BURDEN BLVD: INTERSECTION CRASHES The project team conducted a crash analysis of the intersection at N Road 68 and Burden Boulevard with the most recent year of published data (2022) obtained from WSDOT to assess two four-year-study periods: • Before: January 2015 to December 2018 • After: January 2019 to December 2022 Based on the ‘Junction Relationship’ recorded in the crash reports (Appendix C) only crashes reported as taking place ‘at the intersection’ or as ‘intersection related’ were included in this evaluation. The location of crashes from 2015 to 2018 (four years) and 2019 to 2022 (four years) Page 113 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 7 are shown below in Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively. During both periods, all crashes that resulted in a suspected serious or minor injury occurred in the center of the intersection, within the area of highest vehicle-to-vehicle conflict points, as shown in Figure 9. FIGURE 7 : N ROAD 68 & BURDEN BLVD INTERSECTION CRASHES, 2015 -2018 Source: Google MyMaps full access online here FIGURE 8 : N ROAD 68 & BURDEN BLVD INTERSECTION CRASHES, 2019 – 2022 No fatal crashes occurred during this study period. 2019 –2022 N Rd 68 & Burden Blvd Crash Severity Page 114 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 8 FIGURE 9 : TRADITIONAL FOUR-WAY INTERSECTION CONFLICT POINTS Source: WASHINGTON STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY DRAFT PLAN 2024 In the before-study period, disregarding the signal contributed to eight crashes, of which seven were angle crashes and two resulted in a suspected serious injury. An additional five crashes involved a speeding driver. None of these speed-involved crashes resulted in a suspected serious or minor injury. After the automated photo enforcement system was implemented, there were two instances disregarding the signal contributed to crashes, both took place on a Saturday. First, in November 2020, a driver traveling straight northbound was reportedly distracted by objects outside the vehicle when they struck another vehicle from the opposite direction turning left. No apparent injury was reported. The other crash took place in January 2022 and involved a speeding driver, entering at an angle, which resulted in a suspected serious injury. There were a total of three crashes involving a speeding driver in the after period; there were no apparent injuries reported for the other two crashes. Figure 10 shows the total yearly crashes at Road 68 and Burden Blvd from 2015 through 2022. Page 115 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 9 FIGURE 10: N ROAD 68 & BURDEN BLVD INTERSECTION YEARLY CRASHES, 2015 – 2022 The total number of crashes from 2015 to 2018, before installation of the automated photo enforcement system, was 95 with an average of 23.75 crashes per year. After installation, from 2019 to 2022, there was a total of 62 crashes with an average of 15.50 crashes per year. The data suggests crashes reduced by approximately eight crashes on average annually, a 35% decrease. Figure 11 and Figure 12 summarize the annual average number of crashes that occurred before and after the installation of the red-light running system, categorized by crash type and crash severity. FIGURE 11: N ROAD 68 & BURDEN BLVD ANNUAL AVERAGE CRASH FREQUENCY BY CRASH TYPE 11.00 6.50 3.50 1.50 1.25 0.50 1.25 0.50 3.00 10.25 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 Rear-End Sideswipe Entering at Angle Left Turn Other Annual Average Crash Frequency by Collision Type Annual Average # Crashes (2015 - 2018)Annual Average # Crashes (2019 - 2022) Page 116 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 10 FIGURE 12: N ROAD 68 & BURDEN BLVD ANNUAL AVERAGE CRASH FREQUENCY BY SEVERITY The four main collision categories listed in the Figure 11 (Rear-End, Sideswipe, Entering at Angle, and Left Turn) will inherently occur at traditional four-way intersections due to the relatively high number of conflict points. Figure 11 indicates a downward trend in all crash types; the most significant changes are observed in the annual average number of angle crashes (i.e. entering at angle), which reduced by approximately 85 percent, and the annual average number sideswipe crashes that decreased approximately 55 percent. Following too closely was the leading contributor of crashes, accounting for about 40 percent (24 crashes). According to the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Manual, improving traffic signal coordination on a corridor may not only improve traffic flow, it also might reduce the number of rear end collisions.3 Road 68 currently has the infrastructure in place to implement signal coordination for both northbound and southbound traffic. Figure 12 shows the annual average frequency of crashes resulting in a suspected or minor injury has remained the same as before the system was implemented while crashes resulting in possible injuries or in no apparent injuries have decreased, approximately 70 percent and 26 percent, respectively. Overall, the data suggests the red-light running system has effectively reduced the frequency of red-light running related crashes at this intersection, in particular along the enforced legs (northbound/southbound) and crashes that lead to injury. Among the 2022 crashes, the majority of crashes resulted in ‘no apparent’ injury and involved westbound vehicles (Figure 13). 3 Federal Highway Administration Highway Safety Improvement Program Manual 3.0 Planning: Countermeasure Identification (July 15, 2011) full access online here 0.50 0 .25 5.00 18.00 13.25 1.50 0.25 0.50 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 Suspected Serious Injury Suspected Minor Injury Possible Injury No Apparent Injury Average Annual Crash Frequency by Severity Annual Average # Crashes (2015 - 2018)Annual Average # Crashes (2019 - 2022) Page 117 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 11 FIGURE 13: N ROAD 68 & BURDEN BLVD COLLISION DIAGRAM (2022) Page 118 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 12 N 20TH AVENUE & W COURT STREET The intersection at N 20th Avenue and Court Street is also within one of the City’s retail business districts.4 This intersection is one block (approximately 1,200 feet) south from Robert Frost Elementary School. The automated photo enforcement cameras are placed along the north and east legs. Both roadways are classified as principal arterials with a 30 MPH posted speed limit. All approaches contain five lanes. N 20th Avenue also connects with I-182 and leads to the Sun Willows Golf Course as well as the Tri-Cities Airport and surrounding hotels. W Court Street serves as one of the City’s main east-west connectors within the City and connects with U.S. highway 395. All data for the automated photo enforcement program at the westbound and southbound approaches of 20th Avenue and Court Street are sourced from Redflex Alcyon reports. The data from September 2019 to March 2022 are retained from the Phase 1 and 2 studies. Data from April 2022 to July 2024 was collected separately. To ensure consistent comparisons across months and years, the analysis began in September 2019 and continued through July 2024. The automated photo enforcement cameras are placed along the westbound and southbound approaches of 20th Avenue and Court Street. All automated photo enforcement program data for these approaches came from Redflex Alcyon reports. Data was compiled for: • September 2019 to December 2019 (Phase 1 Study) • January 2020 to March 2022 (Phase 2 Study) • April 2022 to July 2024 (new data obtained for this Phase 3 Study) To provide clear comparisons between months and years, this data was combined into September 2019 through July 2024. The violation data from the westbound and southbound approach cameras is presented in the following sections. 4 City of Pasco, Washington interactive Parcels, Zoning, and Lane Use Viewer, accessed by DKS Associates July 2024. Page 119 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 13 SOUTHBOUND 20TH AVE RED-LIGHT RUNNING VIOLATIONS A total of 9,247 citations are issued from Sept 2019 to July 2024 at this approach. Figure 8 presents summary of citations issued at this study approach. FIGURE 7 : 20TH AVE & W COURT ST: SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS (2019-2024) BY MONTH Citations for southbound 20th Avenue have remained steady over the last five years, particularly after the initial two months following implementation (September and October of 2019). Citations were lower in 2020, likely due to lessened traffic activity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. On average, the southbound approach has 157 citations per month. The yearly trend includes increased citations during early fall and late spring, and lower citations in the winter. These trends likely reflect the traffic volume patterns of the southbound approach. February 2022 shows a much lower than expected citations, most likely due to lack of officer availability to approve incidents. Figure 8 presents citation by day of the week. FIGURE 8: 20th AVE & W COURT ST: SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS (2019-2024) BY WEEKDAY Page 120 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 14 Similar to Highest citations are given on Fridays (likely due to unfamiliar drivers) and lowest on Sundays (lower traffic demand). These trends are not as pronounced as at Road 68 and Burden Boulevard, as there is not a nearby regional attraction (like the HAPO center) that brings in unfamiliar drivers on the weekend. Figure 10 presents summary of citation by hour of the day. FIGURE 9: 20th AVE & W COURT ST: SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATION (2019-2024) BY HOUR The highest number of citations occur in the afternoon and then during the evening rush hour from 3 PM to 5 PM. The noon spike could be caused by drivers taking chances while returning to work after lunch. WESTBOUND COURT STREET RED-LIGHT RUNNING VIOLATIONS A total of 8,273 citations are issued at this approach from Sept 2019 to July 2024 with an average of 142 citations per month. Figure 11 presents a summary of citation by month. Page 121 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 15 FIGURE 10: 20TH AVE & W COURT ST: WB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATION (2019-2024) BY MONTH Similar to the southbound direction, the westbound direction does not see a major decrease in red- light running violations between 2019 and 2024. The monthly trends do not show much of a particular pattern, other than somewhat lower violation incidents in the winter. February 2022 shows a much lower than expected citations, most likely due to lack of officer availability to approve incidents. Figure 12 presents summary of citation by day of the week. FIGURE 11: WB 20th AVE & W COURT ST RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATION (2019-2024) BY WEEKDAY The daily citations follow a similar pattern to the southbound approach, with Friday as the highest and Sunday as the lowest number. Figure 13 presents summary of citation by time of the day. Highest citations are given from afternoon to evening rush hour time (1 PM to 5 PM). Page 122 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 16 FIGURE 12: WB 20th AVE & W COURT ST RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATION (2019 -2024) BY HOUR The westbound Court Street approach experiences a clear spike in citation incidents from 2-4 PM, likely indicating school pick-up drivers taking more chances at the signal. Overall, both approaches to the 20th Avenue and Court Street intersection indicate a higher citation incidence rate than the Burden Blvd and Road 68 intersection. Southbound 20th Avenue has the highest rate, with drivers approximately four times more likely to generate a citation than on the southbound approach of Road 68 to Burden Blvd, which is the highest incident approach to that intersection. This indicates more prevalent red-light running driving behavior at 20th Avenue and Court Street. N 20TH AVE & W COURT ST: INTERSECTION CRASHES Similarly to the preceding intersection crash analysis, the project team conducted an evaluation of the intersection at N 20th Avenue and W Court Street with the most recent year of published data (2022) obtained from WSDOT to assess two four-year-study periods: • Before: January 2015 to December 2018 • After: January 2019 to December 2022 Based on the ‘Junction Relationship’ recorded in the crash reports (Appendix D), only crashes reported as taking place ‘at the intersection’ or as ‘intersection related’ were included in this evaluation. The location of crashes from 2015 to 2018 and 2019 to 2022 are shown below in Figure 13 and Figure 14, respectively. Page 123 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 17 FIGURE 13: N 20TH AVE & W COURT ST INTERSECTION CRASHES, 2015 – 2018 FIGURE 14: N 20TH AVE & W COURT ST INTERSECTION CRASHES, 2019 – 2022 No fatal or suspected serious injury crashes occurred during this study period. 2015 –2018 N 20th Ave & W Court St Crash Severity Page 124 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 18 During both periods, all crashes that resulted in a suspected minor injury, the most severe injury type recorded, took place within the area of highest vehicle-to-vehicle conflict points. In the before period, disregarding the signal contributed to five crashes, of which four were left-turn crashes, three resulted in no apparent injuries while one was a possible injury, and one was an angle crash that resulted in. No reported crashes during the before study period involved a speeding driver. After the automated photo enforcement system was implemented, there were four instances disregarding the signal contributed to crashes, three angle and one left-turn crash. The oldest crash, which was an angle crash, took place in January 2020 during dry, dawn conditions, and resulted in a possible injury. The three crashes to follow did not result in apparent injuries. The most recent crash, which was also the only left-turn crash, occurred in June 2022 during dry, daylight conditions. No reported crashes during the after-study period involved a speeding driver. The total number of crashes from 2015 to 2018, before installation of the automated photo enforcement system, was 73 with an average of 18.25 crashes per year, as shown in Figure 15. FIGURE 15: N 20TH AVE & W COURT ST ANNUAL CRASHES, 2015 – 2022 After installation, from 2020 to 2022, there was a total of 39 crashes with an average of 9.75 crashes per year. The data suggests crashes reduced by approximately nine crashes on average annually, nearly a 50% decrease. Figure 16 and Figure 17 summarize the annual average number of crashes that occurred before and after the installation of the red-light running system, categorized by crash type and crash severity. Page 125 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 19 FIGURE 16: N 20TH AVE & W COURT ST ANNUAL AVERAGE CRASH FREQUENCY BY CRASH TYPE FIGURE 17: N 20TH AVE & W COURT ST ANNUAL AVERAGE CRASH FREQUENCY BY SEVERITY Figure 16 shows most crash types decreased, in particular sideswipe crashes by about 90% and other crashes by 80%. During the same time, angle crashes doubled from four to eight, three were the result of disregarding the traffic signal (two in 2020 and one in 2021). All these crashes were 8.00 2.50 1.00 5.50 1.25 0.25 2.25 2 .00 0.25 5 .00 10 5 0 5 10 Rear-End Sideswipe Entering at Angle Left Turn Other Annual Average Crash Frequency by Collision Type Annual Average # Crashes (2015 - 2018)Annual Average # Crashes (2019 - 2022) 0 .00 0.75 4.25 13.25 7.25 2.00 1.00 0 .00 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 Suspected Serious Injury Suspected Minor Injury Possible Injury No Apparent Injury Average Annual Crash Frequency by Severity Annual Average # Crashes (2015 - 2018)Annual Average # Crashes (2019 - 2022) Page 126 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 20 reported to have taken place in the core area of the intersection. The leading contributor of crashes was still following too closely, accounting for about 30% (11 crashes). Figure 17 shows the annual average frequency of crashes resulting in a suspected serious injury has remained at zero while the number of possible injuries and no apparent injuries have reduced in half. Crashes resulting in a suspected minor injury have increased by about 33%. Overall, the data suggests the red-light running system has effectively reduced the frequency of red-light running related crashes at this intersection, in particular crashes that result in injury. The majority of crashes involved southbound vehicles, along one of the enforced legs (Figure 18). However, along the other enforced leg (westbound), a single crash was recorded in 2022 and the frequency of crashes at this intersection have decreased significantly, on average, nine crashes annually. Page 127 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 21 FIGURE 18: N 20TH AVE & W COURT ST COLLISION DIAGRAM (2022) Page 128 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 22 NEW CAMERA LOCATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS Using the safety improvement trends documented at the red-light camera intersections, the project team used the most recent available five years of crash data (2018-2022) to evaluated signalized intersections throughout the City of Pasco for the intersections with the highest potential safety benefit from a red-light camera. The existing cameras have shown tendencies to decrease angle crashes at intersections, so signalized intersections with high frequencies of these types of crashes were considered. Based on this analysis, four signalized intersections, shown in Figure 19, are potential candidates for red light cameras. o Court Street/22nd Avenue o Road 68/Wrigley Drive o Lewis Street/28th Avenue o Sylvester Street/28th Avenue FIGURE 19: ADDITIONAL RED-LIGHT CAMERA LOCATIONS Additional detail by location is summarized as follows: • Court Street/22nd Avenue - This location had 23 angle crashes from 2018 to 2022. This intersection is 660 feet west of the site of the existing red-light camera at Court Street/20th Avenue. This intersection also has some access challenges and turn conflicts on Court Street, as westbound left-turns from Court Street into the McDonalds driveway conflict with the eastbound left turn lane. Page 129 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 23 • Road 68/Wrigley Drive - This location had 15 angle crashes from 2018 to 2022. This intersection is about 1,500 feet north of the site of the existing red-light camera at Road 68/Burden Boulevard. • Lewis Street/28th Avenue - This location had 13 angle crashes from 2017 to 2022, including one resulting in suspected serious injury. This intersection is a gateway to US 395, and it provides access to an area with many commercial land uses. • Sylvester Street/28th Avenue - This location had 14 angle crashes from 2017 to 2022, including one resulting in suspected serious injury. This intersection is approximately 630 feet north of Lewis Street/28th Avenue. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The evaluation resulted in these findings related to the effect of the automated photo enforcement program at the study intersections: • Red-light running frequency has seen an initial decline but has now plateaued: With the addition of the automated enforcement system, red light running patterns initially reduced, then leveled off after about two years of implementation. • Fridays have the highest incidence of red-light running: While the reasons for this trend are not immediately clear, there is statistically significant data showing that Fridays include more violations. • Safety has improved. Before-and-after data indicate a clear downward trend in crash frequency at both intersections, with approximately 35-50% decrease across both locations. Recommendations. The study team recommends the City of Pasco consider the following: • Continue use of automated photo enforcement at the locations with current systems installed and operational, based on the resulting reduction in traffic crashes. • Review the citation data yearly to identify trends such as the drop in citations from the northbound camera on Road 68 at Burden Boulevard. Unexpected changes in data can be passed on to RedFlex, who can ensure that the system is operating properly. • Based on the results of the new camera location viability analysis, consider expanding the program to the following intersections and continue to monitor the effectiveness of each installation: o Court Street/22nd Avenue o Road 68/Wrigley Drive o Lewis Street/28th Avenue o Sylvester Street/28th Avenue • Consider the following criteria when selecting future camera intersections and approaches: o Frequency of crashes o Frequency of crashes involving personal injury o Frequency of the types of crashes typically reduced by automated enforcement at signalized intersections (e.g., angle, left-turn crashes) Page 130 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 24 o Lack of adequate space for traditional law enforcement activities o High volumes or ROW/access constraints that may make traditional law enforcement activities infeasible Page 131 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 APPENDIX CONTENTS APPENDIX A: AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM DATA ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION - PHASE 1 APPENDIX B: AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM DATA ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION - PHASE 2 APPENDIX C: ROAD 68 AND BURDEN BLVD CRASH DATA APPENDIX D: COURT STREET AND 20TH AVENUE CRASH DATA Page 132 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 APPENDIX A: AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM DATA ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION - PHASE 1 Page 133 of 269 CITY OF PASCO: AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM STUDY, PHASE 1 DATE: September 21, 2020 TO: Steve Worley | City of Pasco FROM: Brian Chandler and Caleb Trapp | DKS Associates SUBJECT: Automated Photo Enforcement Program Data Analysis and Evaluation Project #20118-000 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A history of intersection traffic crashes at the N 20th Ave & W Court St and N Rd 68th & Burden Blvd intersections prompted the City of Pasco to install automated photo enforcement at these locations. The purpose of the automated photo enforcement program is to reduce the frequency of red-light running events and related crashes that can lead to personal injury (e.g., angle crashes, left-turn crashes). A video survey in December of 2017 suggested that the addition of automated enforcement could issue hundreds notices a month and hopefully change driver behavior. In spring of 2018, the City of Pasco installed automated enforcement at two intersections, N 20 th Ave & W Court St and N Rd 68th & Burden Blvd. The results of this study will conclude the effect of this study and potential next steps for the City. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Automated Photo Enforcement Program at these two locations based on a limited data set, and to make a recommendation regarding continuation of the program. The evaluation resulted in these findings related to the effect of the automated photo enforcement program at the study intersections:  Red-lighting running has reduced. Before-and-after data show a reduction in the frequency of red-light running events at the approaches with automated enforcement systems installed.  Safety may be improved, too. The data available for crash analysis were limited, but crashes the team studied indicated a downward trend in collisions at these intersections. More time is required to conduct a valid safety analysis. Page 134 of 269 2 N ROAD 68 & BURDEN BOULEVARD NORTHBOUND RED-LIGHT RUNNING VIOLATIONS All automated photo enforcement program data for N Road 68 & Burden Boulevard came from Redflex Alycyon reports from February 2019 to June 2020. On April 16 th, 2019, the northbound automated photo enforcement system, was functional and began issuing warnings to vehicles. Starting August 19th, 2019, the system began issuing tickets to vehicles, and stopped issuing warnings. To provide clear comparisons between months, the study team started analysis in September 2019 and continued through June 2020. During the study period, the system issued 1,034 red-light running citations for northbound drivers violating the traffic signal. Figure 1 shows the frequency of citations per month. FIGURE 1. 68 AND BURDEN: NORTHBOUND RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY MONTH As seen in Figure 1, the most tickets issued in a month was 135 in September 2019, and the fewest was 62 in February 2020. From September 2019 to February 2020, red-light running saw a decreasing trend as the number of tickets issued fell from 135 a month to 62. The data suggests a strong downward trend for these 5 months, confirming the City’s decision to install automated enforcement. From March 2020 to June, COVID-19 has been a factor in traffic volumes and thus effect red-light running numbers. The number of violations has increased into the summer as traffic volumes increased, but the number has remained below previous levels. Figure 2 below illustrates the frequency of red-light violations and citations by day of the week. 135 129 121 83 66 62 64 91 118 112 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Page 135 of 269 3 FIGURE 2. 68 AND BURDEN NORTHBOUND RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY DAY OF WEEK Friday has the greatest occurrence of red-light running with a total of 206 tickets issued during the study period, or roughly 60 higher than the average of 148. Higher Friday and Saturday citation frequency may indicate more red-light running during recreational travel (including Friday and Saturday nights) than weekday commuter trips. SOUTHBOUND RD 68 RED-LIGHT RUNNING VIOLATIONS All automated enforcement data for N Road 68 & Burden Boulevard came from Redflex Alycyon reports from February 2019 to June 2020. On April 15th, 2019, the Southbound automated enforcement system was functional and began issuing warnings to vehicles. Starting August 19 th, 2019, the system began issuing tickets to vehicles, and stopped issuing warnings. To provide clear comparisons between months, the study team started analysis in September 2019 and continued through June 2020. During the study period, the system issued 2,063 red-light running citations for northbound drivers violating the traffic signal. Figure 3 shows the frequency of citations per month. 127 140 117 111 144 206 189 0 50 100 150 200 250 Day of the Week Average Page 136 of 269 4 FIGURE 3. 68 AND BURDEN SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY MONTH As seen in Figure 3, the most tickets issued in a month was 335 in September 2019, and the fewest was 98 in April 2020. The general trend is a large decrease in the fall of 2019, then remaining in the 100 to 150 range from January to June. From September 2019 to February 2020, red-light running saw a large decreasing trend as the number of tickets issued fell by half, from 335 a month to 124, confirming the City’s decision to install the automated photo enforcement program. From March 2020 to June, COVID-19 has been a factor in traffic volumes and thus effect red-light running numbers. The number of violations has increased into the summer as traffic volumes increased, but the number has remained below previous levels. Figure 4 below illustrates the frequency of red-light violations and citations by day of the week. 335 317 245 195 157 124 109 98 137 159 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Page 137 of 269 5 FIGURE 4. 68 AND BURDEN SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING TICKETS BY DAY OF THE WEEK Friday has the greatest occurrence of red-light running with a total of 382 tickets issued during the study period, or roughly 90 higher than the average of 294. Sunday has the lowest number of red- light running with a total of 218, being almost 80 below the average. N RD 68 & BURDEND BLVD: INTERSECTION COLLISIONS The project team conducted a comprehensive safety analysis of the intersection of N Road 68 and Burden Boulevard using WSDOT-provided collision data for two time periods:  Before: 2014-2018  After: September to December 2019 218 314 275 261 304 382 309 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Day of the Week Average Page 138 of 269 6 FIGURE 5. 68 & BURDEN INTERSECTION CRASH LOCATIONS Table 1 and Figure 6 summarize the number of collisions that occurred from 2014 to 2018 (before installation of the red-light running system), categorized by crash severity. TABLE 1. 68 & BURDEN INTERSECTION CRASH FREQUENCY BY SEVERITY AND YEAR CRASH SEVERITY YEARS TOTAL 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY - - 1 1 - 2 SUSPECTED MINOR INJURY 1 1 - - - 2 POSSIBLE INJURY 4 7 3 4 5 23 NO APPARENT INJURY 24 20 16 16 22 98 TOTAL 29 28 20 21 27 125 Page 139 of 269 7 FIGURE 6. 68 & BURDEN INTERSECTION CRASH FREQUENCY BY SEVERITY AND YEAR The total number of crashes from 2014 to 2018, before installation of the automated photo enforcement system, was 125 (average of 25 crashes per year). Table 2 shows a breakdown of those crashes by year and collisions type. TABLE 2. 68 & BURDEN INTERSECTION BY COLLISION TYPE COLLISION TYPE 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 TOTAL REAR-END 14 14 9 10 14 61 SIDESWIPE 3 6 4 7 3 23 ENTERING AT ANGLE 5 6 4 3 5 23 FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE LEFT TURN - ONE RIGHT TURN 2 - 1 - 2 5 FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE LEFT TURN - ONE STRAIGHT 3 1 - 1 1 6 OTHER 2 1 2 - 2 7 TOTAL 29 28 20 21 27 125 The collision types most likely to be reduced with automated photo enforcement are Entering at Angle (23 crashes) and those with vehicles entering from opposite directions (11 crashes). 24 20 16 16 22 4 7 3 4 5 1 1 1 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 No Apparent Injury Possible Injury Suspected Minor Injury Suspected Serious Injury Page 140 of 269 8 Table 3 shows a preliminary before-and-after comparison of the average annual crash frequency at the intersection. It compares the 2014-2018 data to the September to December 2019 time with full automated enforcement implementation (i.e., installation and citations given) and crash data available. TABLE 3. 68 & BURDEN INTERSECTION COLLISION PER YEAR YEAR AVERAGE CRASH FREQUENCY PER YEAR Previous 5 years 2014 - 2018 25 After Installation of the Automated Enforcement Program and Citations September – December 2019 18* *Due to crash data limitations and the date citations were given at the intersection, this value is based upon 4 months of crash data (6 collisions occurred from September to December 2019) and then multiplied by 3 to generate an annual average. This is a non-standard calculation performed only to identify a suggested trend in crashes, but it does not constitute a statistically-valid study. The six crashes that occurred in September-December 2019 were as follows.  Two rear end crashes in September and October  From opposite direction - one stopped – head-on in September  Entering at angle crash in October  Fixed object crash hits metal post in November  From same direction – both going straight – both moving – sideswipe in December Page 141 of 269 9 N 20 TH AVENUE & W COURT STREET SOUTHBOUND 20 TH AVENUE RED-LIGHT RUNNING VIOLATIONS All automated photo enforcement program data for SB N 20th Avenue and W Court Street came from Redflex Alycyon reports from February 2019 to June 2020. On April 16, 2019, the SB automated enforcement system was functional and began issuing warnings to vehicles. Starting August 19, 2019, the system began issuing tickets to vehicles, and stopped issuing warnings. To provide clear comparisons between months, the study team started analysis in September 2019 and continued through June 2020. During the study period, the system issued 1,796 red-light running citations for northbound drivers violating the traffic signal. Figure 7 shows the frequency of citations per month. FIGURE 7. 20th AND COURT: SOUTHBOUND RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY MONTH Overall, the number of red-light running citations has been decreasing. The most tickets issued in a month was 279 in October 2019, and the fewest was 91 in April 2020. From September 2019 to February 2020, red-light running saw a decreasing trend as the number of tickets issued fell from over 250 a month to 113. The data suggests a strong downward trend for these 5 months, confirming the City’s decision to implement the automated photo enforcement program. From March 2020 to June, COVID-19 has been a factor in traffic volumes and thus effect red-light running numbers. The number of violations has increased into the summer as traffic volumes increased, but the number has remained below previous levels. Figure 8 below illustrates the frequency of red-light violations and citations by day of the week. 269 279 205 152 190 113 115 91 154 134 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Page 142 of 269 10 FIGURE 8. 20th AND COURT: SOUTHBOUND RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY DAY OF THE WEEK Friday has the greatest occurrence of red-light running with a total of 326 tickets issued during the study period, or roughly 70 higher than the average of 257. WESTBOUND COURT STREET RED-LIGHT RUNNING VIOLATIONS All automated photo enforcement program data for WB N 20th Avenue and W Court Street came from Redflex Alycyon reports from February 2019 to June 2020. On May 14, 2019, the WB automated photo enforcement system was functional and began issuing warnings to vehicles. Starting August 19, 2019, the system began issuing tickets to vehicles, and stopped issuing warnings. To provide clear comparisons between months, the study team started analysis in September 2019 and continued through June 2020. During the study period, the system issued 1,287 red-light running citations for northbound drivers violating the traffic signal. Figure 9 shows the frequency of citations per month. 189 245 237 258 310 326 231 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Day of the Week Average Page 143 of 269 11 FIGURE 9. 20th AND COURT: WESTBOUND RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY MONTH Overall issued red-light running tickets through the study period began increasing, and then decreased again over the winter. The most tickets issued in a month was 197 in December 2019, and the fewest was 34 in September 2019. In this case, the study team suspects problems with the automated photo enforcement system in September and October that resulted in these lower- than-anticipated citations compared to the other approaches in this study. From March 2020 to June 2020, COVID-19 has been a factor in traffic volumes and thus effect red- light running numbers. The number of violations has increased into the summer as traffic volumes increased, but the number has remained below previous levels. Figure 10 illustrates the frequency of red-light violations and citations by day of the week. 34 114 189 197 176 110 91 93 120 127 0 50 100 150 200 250 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Page 144 of 269 12 FIGURE 10. 20th AND COURT WESTBOUND RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY DAY OF THE WEEK Friday has the greatest occurrence of red-light running with a total of 217 tickets issued during the study period while Sunday had the lowest of 148 tickets. The average red-light violations for any day of the week is 184, with a maximum and minimum values within 40 crashes. 148 198 210 149 210 217 155 0 50 100 150 200 250 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Day of the Week Average Page 145 of 269 13 N 20 TH AVE & W COURT ST: INTERSECTION COLLISIONS The project team conducted a comprehensive safety analysis of the intersection of N 20th Avenue and W Court Street using the City of Pasco collision data from 2014 to May 2020. After selecting crashes specifically at the intersection, the study team identified 64 collisions. FIGURE 11. 20th AND COURT INTERSECTION CRASH LOCATIONS Table 4 and Figure 12 summarize the number of collisions that occurred over since 2014, categorized by crash severity. TABLE 4. 20th & COURT INTERSECTION CRASH FREQUENCY BY SEVERITY AND YEAR CRASH SEVERITY YEAR GRAND TOTAL 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 NO APPARENT INJURY 11 10 5 11 6 43 POSSIBLE INJURY 5 1 - 4 4 14 SUSPECTED MINOR INJURY 1 - - - - 1 TOTAL 17 11 5 15 10 58 Page 146 of 269 14 FIGURE 12. 20th AND COURT: INTERSECTION CRASH FREQUENCY BY SEVERITY AND YEAR The total number of crashes from 2014 to 2018, before implementation of the automated photo enforcement program, was 58 (average of 11.6 crashes per year). Table 13 shows a breakdown of those crashes by year and collisions type. TABLE 13. 20th & COURT INTERSECTION BY COLLISION TYPES COLLISION TYPE 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 TOTAL REAR END 12 4 2 6 2 20 FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE LEFT TURN - ONE STRAIGHT 1 3 - 7 6 17 ENTERING AT ANGLE 1 - 3 1 1 6 FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE RIGHT TURN - ONE STRAIGHT 1 2 - 1 - 4 SIDESWIPE 2 1 - - 1 3 FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE LEFT TURN - ONE RIGHT TURN - 1 - - - 1 TOTAL 17 11 5 15 10 58 Rear-end collisions were the largest crash type at 20 events or 34% of all collisions at this intersection. The next highest with 17 crashes out of 64, or 29%, was left turn hitting a vehicle going straight in the opposite direction. 11 10 5 11 6 5 1 4 4 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 No Apparent Injury Possible Injury Suspected Minor Injury Page 147 of 269 15 Table 14 shows a preliminary before-and-after comparison of the average annual crash frequency at the intersection. It compares the 2014-2018 data to the September to December 2019 time with full automated photo enforcement program implementation (i.e., installation and citations given) and crash data available. TABLE 14. 20th & COURT INTERSECTION COLLISION PER YEAR YEAR AVERAGE CRASH FREQUENCY PER YEAR Previous 5 years 2014 - 2018 11.6 After Implementation of the Automated Photo Enforcement Program and Citations September – December 2019 6* *Due to crash data limitations and the date citations were given at the intersection, this value is based upon 4 months of crash data (2 collisions occurred from September to December 2019) and then multiplied by 3 to generate an annual average. This is a non-standard calculation performed only to identify a suggested trend in crashes, but it does not constitute a statistically-valid study. The two crashes that occurred in September-December 2019 were as follows.  From opposite direction – one left turn – one straight in September  Entering at angle in October STUDY LIMITATIONS AND NEXT STEPS Analysis of the automated photo enforcement program relied on data from the vendor for violation and citation data, and on the State of Washington for collision data.  For the 20th & Court Westbound approach, data analysis indicates issues with the initial placement of equipment for the automated photo enforcement program, resulting in low Fall 2020 citation numbers. This was not the case on the other 20 th & Court approach or the Rd 68 & Burden intersection.  State of Washington crash data for 2020 were not sufficiently validated, so they were not used.  Since the system was installed and tested throughout 2019, the study team did not use any crash or violation data from January-August 2019. The COVID-19 pandemic, Washington’s stay-at-home order, and associated reductions in traffic volume had a significant effect on the data. The study team recommends a second phase of analysis to confirm the observed reductions in red- light running violations and associated collisions at the two intersections. As the impact of COVID- 19 lessens, the value of the system to reduce crashes will be easier to assess. Page 148 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 APPENDIX B : AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM DATA ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION - PHASE 2 Page 149 of 269 CITY OF PASCO: AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM STUDY, PHASE 2 DATE: June 21, 2022 TO: Steve Worley | City of Pasco FROM: Brian Chandler, Jasmine Douglas, and Caleb Trapp | DKS Associates SUBJECT: Automated Photo Enforcement Program Data Analysis and Evaluation: Phase 2 Project #22072-000 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A history of intersection traffic crashes at the N 20th Avenue & W Court Street and N Rd 68 & Burden Boulevard intersections prompted the City of Pasco to install automated photo enforcement at these locations. The purpose of the automated photo enforcement program is to reduce the frequency of red-light running events and related crashes that can lead to personal injury (e.g., angle crashes, left-turn crashes). A video survey in December of 2017 suggested that the addition of automated enforcement could issue hundreds of notices per month with the intent of changing driver behavior and improving safety at these locations. The City of Pasco installed automated enforcement at two intersections, N 20th Avenue & W Court Street and N Rd 68 & Burden Boulevard. On April 16, 2019, the automated enforcement system was functional and began issuing warnings to vehicles. Starting August 19, 2019, the system began issuing tickets to vehicles, and stopped issuing warnings. DKS Associates conducted an initial study (using limited data from September 2019 to June 2020) to evaluate the initial effects of implementing the enforcement program to aid the City in decision- making. The evaluation concluded that red-light running seemed to be reducing over time. The after period for crash data was only 4 months, so while the frequency of collisions reduced during this period, the study recommended that more time would be required to conduct a future safety analysis after more information was available. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the automated photo enforcement program at these two locations to support City staff and Council decisions regarding the program. The evaluation resulted in these findings related to the effect of the automated photo enforcement program at the study intersections:  Red-light running frequency has seen mixed results. With the addition of the automated enforcement system, red light running patterns slightly reduced, increased, or remained stagnant, depending on location and direction of travel.  Safety has improved. Before-and-after data indicate a clear downward trend in crash frequency at both intersections. Page 150 of 269 2 N ROAD 68 & BURDEN BOULEVARD NORTHBOUND RED-LIGHT RUNNING VIOLATIONS All automated photo enforcement program data for N Road 68 & Burden Boulevard came from Redflex Alcyon reports. Data from September 2019 to December 2019 was retained from the Phase 1 study, while data from January 2020 to March 2022 was obtained separately. To provide clear comparisons between months and years, the study team started the analysis in September 2019 and continued through December 2021. During the study period, the system issued 2,858 red-light running citations for northbound drivers violating the traffic signal. Figure 1 shows the frequency of citations per month. FIGURE 1. RD 68 & BURDEN: NB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY MONTH As seen in Figure 1, the most tickets issued in a month was 135 in September 2019, and the fewest was 65 in February 2020. During the Phase 1 study from September 2019 to February 2020, red-light running saw a decreasing trend as the number of tickets issued fell from 135 a month to 62. During that 5-month period, the data suggested a strong downward trend. From September 2019 to December 2021 red-light running saw a consistent average of approximately 102 vehicles per month. The May – June and October – November time frames saw the most red-light running citations. Whereas the January – February time frame saw the least number of citations. The data does not suggest any significant decrease or increase in monthly citations issued over the study period. The linear average is flat. Figure 2, below, illustrates the frequency of red-light violations and citations by day of the week for the northbound direction. 135 129 121 83 70 65 65 94 121 113 129 83 106 123 88 112 83 75 111 116 126 110 76 83 103 120 116 102 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Se p Oc t No v De c Ja n Fe b Ma r Ap r Ma y Ju n Ju l Au g Se p Oc t No v De c Ja n Fe b Ma r Ap r Ma y Ju n Ju l Au g Se p Oc t No v De c 2019 2020 2021 Page 151 of 269 3 FIGURE 2. RD 68 & BURDEN NB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY DAY OF WEEK Consistent with the Phase 1 study, Friday continues to show the greatest occurrence of red-light running with a total of 501 tickets issued during the study period, which is 93 higher than the average of 408. Sunday has the lowest number of red-light running with a total of 336, being almost 72 below the average. Higher Friday and Saturday citation frequency may indicate more red-light running during recreational travel (including Friday and Saturday nights) than weekday commuter trips. Figure 3, below, illustrates the frequency of red-light violations and citations by hour of the day from January 2020 to December 2021.1 1 This detail was not available for the September-December 2019 citation data for both intersections and directions. 336 384 390 364 407 501 476 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Day of the Week Average Page 152 of 269 4 FIGURE 3. RD 68 & BURDEN NB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY HOUR OF THE DAY The data suggests a mid-day peak in citations with a high of 257 tickets issued during the 3PM hour and an average of 233 citations issued between the hours of 12PM and 5PM. Higher citation frequency during mid-day could stem from drivers going to and from lunch, end of the school day, and typical PM peak traffic volumes. SOUTHBOUND RD 68 RED-LIGHT RUNNING VIOLATIONS All automated photo enforcement program data for N Road 68 & Burden Boulevard came from Redflex Alcyon reports. Data from September 2019 to December 2019 was retained from the Phase 1 study, while data from January 2020 to March 2022 was obtained separately. To provide clear comparisons between months and years, the study team started the analysis in September 2019 and continued through December 2021. During the study period, the system issued 4,357 red-light running citations for southbound drivers violating the traffic signal. Figure 4 shows the frequency of citations per month. 6 4 3 5 16 36 50 61 80 83 102 138 231 235 212 257 223 242 146 99 62 56 31 12 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 12 AM 1 AM 2 AM 3 AM 4 AM 5 AM 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM Page 153 of 269 5 FIGURE 4. RD 68 & BURDEN SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY MONTH As seen in Figure 4, the most tickets issued in a month was 335 in September 2019, and the fewest was 70 in January 2020. Fall of 2019 marked the first four full months of citations after the installment of the automated photo enforcement program; thus, a high number of violations in the early stages of enforcement (September and October 2019) was expected. This location saw a general decreasing trend in red-light running after that time. Since January of 2020, an average of 136 tickets were issued a month with a high of 217 in May of 2021. In general, the winter months of November – February saw the fewest number of citations whereas the summer months of May – August saw the most. Overall, the data suggest a decreasing trend in monthly citations issued over the study period. Figure 5, below, illustrates the frequency of red-light violations and citations by day of the week. FIGURE 5. RD 68 & BURDEN SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING TICKETS BY DAY OF THE WEEK 335 317 245 195 163 128 119 103 141 169 146 130 142 133 79 76 70 98 181 189 217 195 125 182 153 143 102 81 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Se p Oc t No v De c Ja n Fe b Ma r Ap r Ma y Ju n Ju l Au g Se p Oc t No v De c Ja n Fe b Ma r Ap r Ma y Ju n Ju l Au g Se p Oc t No v De c 2019 2020 2021 479 613 594 596 606 782 687 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Day of the Week Average Page 154 of 269 6 Friday has the greatest occurrence of red-light running with a total of 782 tickets issued during the study period, approximately 160 higher than the average of 622. Sunday has the lowest number of red-light running with a total of 479, being almost 143 below the average. Figure 6, below, illustrates the frequency of red-light violations and citations by hour of the day from January 2020 to December 2021. FIGURE 6. RD 68 & BURDEN SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY HOUR OF THE DAY The data suggests a mid-day peak in citations with a high of 384 tickets issued during the 12PM hour and an average of 363 citations issued between the hours of 12PM and 3PM. N RD 68 & BURDEN BLVD: INTERSECTION COLLISIONS The project team conducted a safety analysis of the intersection of N Road 68 and Burden Boulevard using WSDOT-provided collision data for two study periods:  Before: 2015 – 2018  After: 2020 – 2021 The year of the installment of the automated photo enforcement program, 2019, was omitted due to the changes that occurred throughout the year. On April 16, 2019, the automated enforcement system was functional and began issuing warnings to vehicles. Starting August 19, 2019, the system began issuing citations to vehicles, and stopped issuing warnings. The location of crashes from 2015 to 2018 and 2020 to 2021 are shown below in Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively. 5 2 1 9 10 30 82 124 129 153 201 273 384 350 357 359 293 245 147 53 27 11 14 6 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 12 AM 1 AM 2 AM 3 AM 4 AM 5 AM 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM Page 155 of 269 7 FIGURE 7. RD 68 & BURDEN INTERSECTION CRASHES BY SEVERITY, 2015-2018 FIGURE 8. RD 68 & BURDEN INTERSECTION CRASH LOCATIONS BY SEVERITY, 2020-2021 No fatal crashes occurred during this study period. No fatal injury crashes occurred during this study period. Page 156 of 269 8 Figures 9 and 10 summarize the annual average number of collisions that occurred before and after the installation of the red-light running system, categorized by crash severity and collision type. FIGURE 9. RD 68 & BURDEN INTERSECTION, ANNUAL AVERAGE CRASH FREQUENCY BY SEVERITY FIGURE 10. RD 68 & BURDEN INTERSECTION, ANNUAL AVERAGE CRASH FREQUENCY BY COLLISION TYPE After automated photo enforcement was implemented, there was a general decrease in the frequency of injury crashes. Additionally, the annual average number of sideswipe crashes was reduced by approximately 50% and crashes resulting from entering at an angle were eliminated. Although the annual average of rear-ends increased by approximately one crash per year, this is consistent with expectations since automated photo enforcement can increase the likelihood of rear-end crashes. 0.50 0.25 5 18 15 1 0 0 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 Suspected Serious Injury Suspected Minor Injury Possible Injury No Apparent Injury Average Annual Crash Frequency by Severity Annual Average # Crashes (2015 ‐ 2018)Annual Average # Crashes (2020 ‐ 2021) 11 6.5 3.5 1.5 1.25 0 1 0 3 12 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 Rear‐End Sideswipe Entering at Angle Left Turn Other Annual Average # Crashes (2015 ‐ 2018)Annual Average # Crashes (2020 ‐ 2021) Page 157 of 269 9 Figure 11 shows a before-and-after comparison of the annual average crash frequency at the intersection. It compares the 2015 – 2018 data to the 2020 – 2021 data with automated enforcement implementation (i.e., installation and citations given) and crash data available. FIGURE 11. RD 68 & BURDEN INTERSECTION ANNUAL AVERAGE CRASH FREQUENCY The total number of crashes from 2015 to 2018, before installation of the automated photo enforcement system, was 95 with an average of 23.75 crashes per year. After installation, from 2020 – 2021, there was a total of 32 crashes with an average of 16 crashes per year. The data suggest crashes reduced by approximately 7.75 crashes on average annually. N 20TH AVENUE & W COURT STREET SOUTHBOUND 20TH AVENUE RED-LIGHT RUNNING VIOLATIONS All automated photo enforcement program data for N 20th Avenue & W Court Street came from Redflex Alcyon reports. Data from September 2019 to December 2019 was retained from the Phase 1 study, while data from January 2020 to March 2022 was obtained separately. To provide clear comparisons between months and years, the study team started the analysis in September 2019 and continued through December 2021. During the study period, the system issued 4,685 red-light running citations for northbound drivers violating the traffic signal. Figure 12 shows the frequency of citations per month. 23.75 16 0 5 10 15 20 25 Before Installation and Citations After Installation and Citations Page 158 of 269 10 FIGURE 12. 20th & COURT: SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY MONTH Overall, the number of red-light running citations has seen a slight decreasing trend. The most tickets issued in a month was 279 in October 2019, and the fewest was 89 in February 2021. Fall of 2019 marked the first four full months of citations after the installment of the automated photo enforcement program; thus, a high number of violations in the early stages of enforcement (September and October 2019), was expected. However, this location saw a general decreasing trend in red-light running after that time. Since January of 2020, a consistent average of 158 tickets were issued a month with a high of 224 in June of 2021. Figure 13, below, illustrates the frequency of red-light violations and citations by day of the week. FIGURE 13. 20th & COURT: SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY DAY OF THE WEEK 269 279 204 152 200 118 124 95 162 143 158 169 149 136 130 140 127 89 161 185 207 224 147 203 213 183 153 165 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Se p Oc t No v De c Ja n Fe b Ma r Ap r Ma y Ju n Ju l Au g Se p Oc t No v De c Ja n Fe b Ma r Ap r Ma y Ju n Ju l Au g Se p Oc t No v De c 2019 2020 2021 526 662 671 665 727 823 611 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Day of the Week Average Page 159 of 269 11 As with the previous intersection, Friday has the greatest occurrence of red-light running with a total of 823 tickets issued during the study period, or roughly 154 higher than the average of 669. Sunday saw the lowest occurrence with a total of 526 tickets issued, which was approximately 143 below the average. Figure 14, below, illustrates the frequency of red-light violations and citations by hour of the day from January 2020 to December 2021. FIGURE 14. 20th & COURT SB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY HOUR OF THE DAY The data suggests a mid-day peak in citations with a high of 330 tickets issued during the 12PM hour and an average of 288 citations issued between the hours of 12PM and 4PM. Interestingly, there is also a significant number of citations issued between 9PM and 12AM, as compared to the previous intersection that did not have an increase at night. WESTBOUND COURT STREET RED-LIGHT RUNNING VIOLATIONS All automated photo enforcement program data for N 20th Avenue & W Court Street came from Redflex Alcyon reports. Data from September 2019 to December 2019 was retained from the Phase 1 study, while data from January 2020 to March 2022 was obtained separately. To provide clear comparisons between months and years, the study team started the analysis in September 2019 and continued through December 2021. During the study period, the system issued 4,098 red-light running citations for westbound drivers violating the traffic signal. Figure 15 shows the frequency of citations per month. 60 27 13 27 37 80 105 153 167 172 213 239 330 234 259 312 306 251 187 171 123 131 99 85 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 12 AM 1 AM 2 AM 3 AM 4 AM 5 AM 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM Page 160 of 269 12 FIGURE 15. 20th & COURT: WB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY MONTH Overall, issued red-light running tickets through the study period saw a slight increasing trend. The most tickets issued in a month (197) occurred three times: December 2019, May 2021, and October 2021. The fewest was 34 in September 2019. In this case, the study team confirmed with Bremerton Police Department that the Redflex cameras were not capturing all violations, resulting in these lower-than-anticipated citations. Omitting this issue, the fewest tickets issued in a month was 94 in March of 2020. Since November 2019, red-light running saw an average of approximately 149 violations per month with the August – October time frames seeing the most red-light running citations. Figure 16 illustrates the frequency of red-light violations and citations by day of the week. FIGURE 16. 20th & COURT WB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY DAY OF THE WEEK 34 114 189 197 181 118 94 98 123 129 166 160 170 166 126 125 118 111 175 152 197 169 123 166 183 197 159 158 0 50 100 150 200 250 Se p Oc t No v De c Ja n Fe b Ma r Ap r Ma y Ju n Ju l Au g Se p Oc t No v De c Ja n Fe b Ma r Ap r Ma y Ju n Ju l Au g Se p Oc t No v De c 2019 2020 2021 494 582 624 524 633 744 497 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Day of the Week Average Page 161 of 269 13 Consistent with the rest of the study, Friday has the greatest occurrence of red-light running with a total of 744 tickets issued during the study period. This is roughly 159 above the average of 585. Sunday had the lowest occurrence of red-light running with a total of 494 tickets: approximately 91 below the average. Figure 17, below, illustrates the frequency of red-light violations and citations by hour of the day from January 2020 to December 2021. FIGURE 17. 20th & COURT WB RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS BY HOUR OF THE DAY The data suggest a mid-day peak in citations with a high of 325 tickets issued during the 2PM hour and an average of 294 citations issued between the hours of 1PM and 5PM. Interestingly, there were also a significant number of citations issued between 9PM and 12AM, which was not seen at the previous intersection. N 20TH AVE & W COURT ST: INTERSECTION COLLISIONS The project team conducted a comprehensive safety analysis of the intersection of N 20th Avenue and W Court Street using WSDOT-provided collision data for two study periods:  Before: 2015 – 2018  After: 2020 – 2021 The year of the installment of the automated photo enforcement program, 2019, was omitted due to the changes that occurred throughout the year. On April 16, 2019, the automated enforcement system was functional and began issuing warnings to vehicles. Starting August 19, 2019, the system began issuing citations to vehicles, and stopped issuing warnings. 31 17 6 17 26 86 104 161 158 156 184 237 192 272 325 318 288 265 195 164 122 94 82 64 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 12 AM 1 AM 2 AM 3 AM 4 AM 5 AM 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM Page 162 of 269 14 The location of crashes from 2015 to 2018 and 2020 to 2021 are shown below in Figure 18 and Figure 19, respectively. FIGURE 18. 20th & COURT INTERSECTION CRASHES, 2015-2018 FIGURE 19. 2020th & COURT INTERSECTION CRASHES, 2020-2021 No fatal or serious injury crashes occurred during this study period. No fatal or serious injury crashes occurred during this study period. Page 163 of 269 15 Figures 20 and 21 summarize the annual average number of collisions that occurred before and after the installation of the red-light running system, categorized by crash severity and collision type. FIGURE 20. 20th & COURT: AVERAGE ANNUAL INTERSECTION CRASH FREQUENCY BY SEVERITY FIGURE 21. 20th & COURT: AVERAGE ANNUAL INTERSECTION CRASH FREQUENCY BY COLLISION TYPE After automated photo enforcement, there was a general decrease in number of injury collisions. Additionally, the annual average number of left turn related crashes was reduced by approximately 73%, and the annual average of crashes that were sideswipes was reduced by approximately 80%. Surprisingly, the annual average number of rear-end crashes was reduced by approximately 63%, which is not typical after automated enforcement implementation. The annual average of crashes resulting from entering at an angle increased by approximately 2 crashes per year. The reason for these results could be the small data set; number less than 5 are often “swingy” and can result in unexpected outcomes. 0 0.75 4.25 13.25 6 1 1 0 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 Suspected Serious Injury Suspected Minor Injury Possible Injury No Apparent Injury Annual Average # Crashes (2015 ‐ 2018)Annual Average # Crashes (2020 ‐ 2021) 8 2.5 1 5.5 1.25 0 1.5 3 0.5 3 10 5 0 5 10 Rear‐End Sideswipe Entering at Angle Left Turn Other Annual Average # Crashes (2015 ‐ 2018)Annual Average # Crashes (2020 ‐ 2021) Page 164 of 269 16 Figure 22 shows a before-and-after comparison of the annual average crash frequency at the intersection. It compares the 2015 – 2018 data to the 2020 – 2021 data with automated enforcement implementation (i.e., installation and citations given) and crash data available. FIGURE 22. 20th & COURT: INTERSECTION ANNUAL AVERAGE CRASH FREQUENCY The total number of crashes from 2015 to 2018, before installation of the automated photo enforcement system, was 73 with an average of 18.25 crashes per year. After installation, from 2020 – 2021, there was a total of 16 crashes with an average of 8 crashes per year. The data suggest crashes reduced by approximately 10.25 crashes on average annually. 18.25 8 0 5 10 15 20 Before Installation and Citations After Installation and Citations Page 165 of 269 17 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The evaluation resulted in these findings related to the effect of the automated photo enforcement program at the study intersections:  Red-light running frequency has seen mixed results. With the addition of the automated enforcement system, red light running patterns slightly reduced, increased, or remained stagnant, depending on location and direction of travel.  Safety has improved. Before-and-after data indicate a clear downward trend in crash frequency at both intersections. Recommendations. The study team recommends the City of Pasco consider the following:  Continue use of automated photo enforcement at the locations with current systems installed and operational, based on the resulting reduction in traffic collisions.  Consider expansion of the system at one or both existing locations by adding cameras to the other legs not currently being enforced by the system.  Conduct a citywide signalized intersection safety assessment to determine which additional locations might be appropriate for an expanded automated enforcement program. Criteria and ranking could include the following: o Frequency of collisions o Frequency of collisions involving personal injury o Frequency of the types of collisions typically reduced by automated enforcement at signalized intersections (e.g., angle, left-turn crashes) o Lack of adequate space for traditional law enforcement activities o High volumes that may make traditional law enforcement activities infeasible  Based on the results of the assessment, expand the program to one or more intersections and conduct further studies to determine effects of each installation. Page 166 of 269 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 APPENDIX C: ROAD 68 AND BURDEN BLVD CRASH DATA Page 167 of 269 FID_ REPORT_NUM LAT LONG PRIMARY_TR BLOCK_ NUMB INTERSECTI DATE YEAR QTR_NUM MONTH 24_HR_TIME MOST_SEV_1 TOTAL_VEHI FIRST_COLL JUNCTION_R WEATHER ROAD_SURFA LIGHTING_C ARM FIRST_IMPA VEH_1_ACTI VEH_1_COMP VEH_1_CO_1 VEH_2_ACTI VEH_2_COMP VEH_2_CO_1 52 E396068 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 1/28/2015 0:00 2015 Q1 Jan 6:56:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 Entering at angle At Driveway within Major Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Left Turn North East Going Straight Ahead West East 23 E398398 46.27065596 -119.1829299 BURDEN BLVD 7000 2/5/2015 0:00 2015 Q1 Feb 10:58:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Overcast Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Slowing East West Stopped in Roadway Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 306 E401776 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 2/18/2015 0:00 2015 Q1 Feb 8:59:00 PM Possible Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead South North Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 53 E403978 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 2/27/2015 0:00 2015 Q1 Feb 7:55:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead East West Slowing East West 307 E406150 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 3/6/2015 0:00 2015 Q1 Mar 11:53:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead South North Going Straight Ahead South North 308 E408812 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 3/17/2015 0:00 2015 Q1 Mar 1:52:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Changing Lanes North South Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 54 E413438 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 4/2/2015 0:00 2015 Q2 Apr 10:10:00 AM Possible Injury 2 Same direction -- both turning right -- one stopped -- rear end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Right Turn West South Making Right Turn West South 286 E414065 46.27113403 -119.1840854 N ROAD 68 4700 4/6/2015 0:00 2015 Q2 Apr 4:39:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Changing Lanes North South Going Straight Ahead North South 309 E418532 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 4/18/2015 0:00 2015 Q2 Apr 10:53:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Changing Lanes South North Going Straight Ahead South North 310 E421979 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 5/4/2015 0:00 2015 Q2 May 6:21:00 PM No Apparent Injury 4 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead South North Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 311 E423684 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 5/9/2015 0:00 2015 Q2 May 9:35:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead South North Slowing South North 312 E431933 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 6/9/2015 0:00 2015 Q2 Jun 5:17:00 PM Possible Injury 3 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Slowing North South Slowing North South 313 E433044 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 6/12/2015 0:00 2015 Q2 Jun 4:00:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Changing Lanes South North Going Straight Ahead South North 24 E437560 46.27067676 -119.1829921 BURDEN BLVD 7000 6/23/2015 0:00 2015 Q2 Jun 2:48:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead East West Going Straight Ahead East West 55 E439970 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 7/4/2015 0:00 2015 Q3 Jul 6:37:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead East West Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign East Vehicle Stopped 56 E440018 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 7/3/2015 0:00 2015 Q3 Jul 10:05:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead East West Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 314 E443806 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 7/16/2015 0:00 2015 Q3 Jul 11:23:00 PM Possible Injury 2 Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Going Straight Ahead West East 57 E444657 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 7/20/2015 0:00 2015 Q3 Jul 9:22:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 Entering at angle At Driveway within Major Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Right Turn East North Making Left Turn North East 58 E450679 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 8/6/2015 0:00 2015 Q3 Aug 3:42:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 Same direction -- both turning right -- both moving -- sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Right Turn West South Making Right Turn West South 315 E460423 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 9/9/2015 0:00 2015 Q3 Sep 2:00:00 PM No Apparent Injury 3 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Driveway within Major Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead South North Slowing South East 59 E473086 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 10/19/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Oct 12:42:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 Entering at angle At Driveway within Major Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Ice Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Right Turn North West Going Straight Ahead East West 60 E474582 46.2706072 -119.1839723 BURDEN BLVD 0 N ROAD 68 10/24/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Oct 11:02:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead East West Stopped for Traffic East West 61 E477893 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 10/31/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Oct 3:52:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - all others At Intersection and Related Raining Wet Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Left Turn East South Making Left Turn East South 62 E478070 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 10/31/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Oct 11:37:00 AM Possible Injury 2 Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Intersecting Trafficway Making Left Turn East South Slowing South North 292 E482568 46.27140026 -119.1841802 N ROAD 68 4800 11/15/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Nov 6:04:00 PM Possible Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 316 E489396 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 11/30/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Nov 3:29:00 PM Suspected Minor Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Overcast Snow/Slush Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Slowing North South Stopped for Traffic North South 63 E491570 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 12/9/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Dec 11:25:00 AM Possible Injury 2 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe At Intersection and Related Overcast Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Left Turn East South Making Left Turn East South 317 E496502 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 12/18/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Dec 4:13:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Driveway within Major Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Left Turn South West Going Straight Ahead North South Pa g e 1 6 8 o f 2 6 9 FID_ REPORT_NUM LAT LONG PRIMARY_TR BLOCK_ NUMB INTERSECTI DATE YEAR QTR_NUM MONTH 24_HR_TIME MOST_SEV_1 TOTAL_VEHI FIRST_COLL JUNCTION_R WEATHER ROAD_SURFA LIGHTING_C ARM FIRST_IMPA VEH_1_ACTI VEH_1_COMP VEH_1_CO_1 VEH_2_ACTI VEH_2_COMP VEH_2_CO_1 1319 E510007 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 1/8/2016 0:00 2016 Q1 Jan 5:56:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Changing Lanes North East Making Right Turn North East 1320 E512197 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 1/29/2016 0:00 2016 Q1 Jan 5:22:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Slowing North South 1321 E512198 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 1/29/2016 0:00 2016 Q1 Jan 3:45:00 PM Suspected Serious Injury 2 Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Going Straight Ahead East West 1322 E524280 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 3/13/2016 0:00 2016 Q1 Mar 5:04:00 AM Possible Injury 2 Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Left Turn South West Making Left Turn West North 1323 E525986 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 3/17/2016 0:00 2016 Q1 Mar 7:38:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dusk 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead South North Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 1003 E528598 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 3/26/2016 0:00 2016 Q1 Mar 8:10:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 Entering at angle At Driveway within Major Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Right Turn North West Going Straight Ahead West West 1324 E529431 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 3/29/2016 0:00 2016 Q1 Mar 5:43:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 Same direction -- both turning right -- both moving -- rear end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Right Turn South East Slowing South East 1325 E532887 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 4/7/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 Apr 8:31:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Left Turn East South Making Left Turn East South 1326 E535972 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 4/18/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 Apr 6:20:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From opposite direction - all others At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Right Turn South East Going Straight Ahead West East 1004 E536704 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 4/22/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 Apr 2:30:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Slowing East West Stopped for Traffic East Vehicle Stopped 1297 E536979 46.27113403 -119.1840854 N ROAD 68 4700 4/24/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 Apr 1:16:00 PM Possible Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Slowing North South 1327 E540993 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 5/6/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 May 2:36:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 1328 E543666 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 5/14/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 May 10:52:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Raining Wet Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign North South 1005 E544830 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 5/18/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 May 7:21:00 PM Possible Injury 2 Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Overcast Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Going Straight Ahead East West 1329 E546363 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 5/22/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 May 2:10:00 PM No Apparent Injury 3 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North North Stopped for Traffic North North 1330 E549229 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 4600 BURDEN BLVD 5/31/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 May 5:14:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign North Vehicle Stopped 1006 E558653 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 7100 N ROAD 68 6/28/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 Jun 2:56:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - one right turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead East West Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 1301 E571791 46.2713623 -119.184159 N ROAD 68 4800 8/8/2016 0:00 2016 Q3 Aug 5:23:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Going Straight Ahead North South 1007 E607298 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 0 N ROAD 68 11/10/2016 0:00 2016 Q4 Nov 8:34:00 AM No Apparent Injury 3 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Slowing East West Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 1008 E621595 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 0 N ROAD 68 12/15/2016 0:00 2016 Q4 Dec 4:43:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From opposite direction - one left turn - one right turn At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Snow/Slush Dusk 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Right Turn West South Making Left Turn East South 1009 E625786 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 0 N ROAD 68 12/28/2016 0:00 2016 Q4 Dec 10:13:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Left Turn East South Making Left Turn East South 2488 E645063 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 2/21/2017 0:00 2017 Q1 Feb 6:41:00 PM Possible Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Overcast Wet Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Stopped in Roadway North South 2489 E645550 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 2/23/2017 0:00 2017 Q1 Feb 10:00:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Changing Lanes Northwest Northeast Going Straight Ahead Northeast Northeast 2154 E647182 46.27062753 -119.1831651 BURDEN BLVD 0 3/1/2017 0:00 2017 Q1 Mar 11:40:00 AM Possible Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead East West Slowing East West 2490 E653969 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 3/19/2017 0:00 2017 Q1 Mar 4:36:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Intersecting Trafficway Making Left Turn East South Making Left Turn East South 2491 E668593 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 5/7/2017 0:00 2017 Q2 May 7:27:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Left Turn South West Making Left Turn South West 2183 E668607 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 0 N ROAD 68 5/3/2017 0:00 2017 Q2 May 4:25:00 PM Possible Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead West East Stopped for Traffic West East 2184 E675389 46.27062317 -119.1835063 BURDEN BLVD 3200 N ROAD 68 5/27/2017 0:00 2017 Q2 May 11:15:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Right Turn South East Slowing South East Pa g e 1 6 9 o f 2 6 9 FID_ REPORT_NUM LAT LONG PRIMARY_TR BLOCK_ NUMB INTERSECTI DATE YEAR QTR_NUM MONTH 24_HR_TIME MOST_SEV_1 TOTAL_VEHI FIRST_COLL JUNCTION_R WEATHER ROAD_SURFA LIGHTING_C ARM FIRST_IMPA VEH_1_ACTI VEH_1_COMP VEH_1_CO_1 VEH_2_ACTI VEH_2_COMP VEH_2_CO_1 2492 E684519 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 6/22/2017 0:00 2017 Q2 Jun 11:28:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Changing Lanes South North Going Straight Ahead South North 2493 E686688 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 6/28/2017 0:00 2017 Q2 Jun 4:10:00 PM Suspected Serious Injury 3 Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Going Straight Ahead East West 2462 E696532 46.27115805 -119.1841063 N ROAD 68 4700 7/28/2017 0:00 2017 Q3 Jul 9:20:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Changing Lanes North South Going Straight Ahead North South 2463 E700770 46.27086956 -119.1839912 N ROAD 68 4700 8/10/2017 0:00 2017 Q3 Aug 7:50:00 PM Possible Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Changing Lanes North South Going Straight Ahead North South 2494 E704575 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 8/21/2017 0:00 2017 Q3 Aug 8:34:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead South North Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 2495 E708226 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 9/2/2017 0:00 2017 Q3 Sep 7:32:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dusk 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Left Turn South West Going Straight Ahead North South 2465 E722335 46.27048239 -119.1838503 N ROAD 68 4700 10/10/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Oct 11:22:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Overcast Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Starting in Traffic Lane South North Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 2185 E723744 46.27060402 -119.1838895 BURDEN BLVD 0 N ROAD 68 10/16/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Oct 2:47:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Left Turn East South Making Left Turn East South 2496 E726119 46.27060402 -119.1838895 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 10/23/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Oct 8:30:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Starting in Traffic Lane South North Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 2497 E741153 46.27061611 -119.1839015 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 11/28/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Nov 5:07:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign North Vehicle Stopped 2165 E750259 46.2706196 -119.1834682 BURDEN BLVD 2500 12/21/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Dec 4:00:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Right Turn North West Going Straight Ahead East West 3537 E755399 46.27095612 -119.184039 N ROAD 68 4700 1/1/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Jan 5:50:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Slowing North South Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 3573 E755577 46.27061611 -119.1839015 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 1/5/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Jan 10:00:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - all others At Intersection and Related Overcast Wet Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Backing Vehicle Backing Vehicle Backing Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 3540 E764634 46.27088044 -119.1839998 N ROAD 68 4700 1/29/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Jan 5:05:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Changing Lanes North South Going Straight Ahead North South 3574 E766085 46.27061611 -119.1839015 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 2/4/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Feb 7:51:00 AM Possible Injury 2 Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Overcast Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Going Straight Ahead West East 3298 E768149 46.27061611 -119.1839015 BURDEN BLVD 0 N ROAD 68 2/10/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Feb 2:40:00 PM Possible Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead West East Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign West Vehicle Stopped 3541 E771619 46.27101331 -119.1840486 N ROAD 68 4700 2/17/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Feb 1:20:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Going Straight Ahead North South 3575 E787915 46.27061611 -119.1839015 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 4/12/2018 0:00 2018 Q2 Apr 4:46:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Slowing Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 3576 E791543 46.27061611 -119.1839015 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 4/23/2018 0:00 2018 Q2 Apr 6:57:00 AM Possible Injury 2 Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Going Straight Ahead East West 3577 E792736 46.27061611 -119.1839015 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 4/25/2018 0:00 2018 Q2 Apr 8:07:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dusk 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead South North Going Straight Ahead South North 3578 E804507 46.27061611 -119.1839015 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 6/2/2018 0:00 2018 Q2 Jun 2:05:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead North South Stopped for Traffic North South 3543 E805838 46.27101331 -119.1840486 N ROAD 68 4700 6/3/2018 0:00 2018 Q2 Jun 4:50:00 PM Possible Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Changing Lanes North South Going Straight Ahead North South 3579 E826315 46.27061611 -119.1839015 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 8/7/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Aug 12:39:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making U- Turn South South Making Right Turn West South 3300 E828768 46.27061611 -119.1839015 BURDEN BLVD 0 N ROAD 68 8/14/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Aug 6:13:00 PM Possible Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead West East Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign West East 3301 E829519 46.27061611 -119.1839015 BURDEN BLVD 0 N ROAD 68 8/18/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Aug 3:50:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead East West Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 3265 E830714 46.27062007 -119.1835536 BURDEN BLVD 4000 8/20/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Aug 4:23:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead East West Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 3556 E833741 46.26995258 -119.1836523 N ROAD 68 4600 8/28/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Aug 6:35:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - sideswipe Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Overtaking and Passing South North Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 3544 E835926 46.27145349 -119.1842088 N ROAD 68 4800 9/7/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Sep 1:40:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Changing Lanes North South Going Straight Ahead North South Pa g e 1 7 0 o f 2 6 9 FID_ REPORT_NUM LAT LONG PRIMARY_TR BLOCK_ NUMB INTERSECTI DATE YEAR QTR_NUM MONTH 24_HR_TIME MOST_SEV_1 TOTAL_VEHI FIRST_COLL JUNCTION_R WEATHER ROAD_SURFA LIGHTING_C ARM FIRST_IMPA VEH_1_ACTI VEH_1_COMP VEH_1_CO_1 VEH_2_ACTI VEH_2_COMP VEH_2_CO_1 3302 E838136 46.27061611 -119.1839015 BURDEN BLVD 0 N ROAD 68 9/11/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Sep 2:40:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Left Turn East South Making Left Turn East South 3580 E838142 46.27061611 -119.1839015 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 9/14/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Sep 9:07:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From opposite direction - one left turn - one right turn At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Right Turn West South Making Left Turn East South 3303 E848658 46.27061611 -119.1839015 BURDEN BLVD 0 N ROAD 68 10/10/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Oct 9:19:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead South North Making Left Turn North East 3266 E855169 46.27062301 -119.1833053 BURDEN BLVD 7200 10/19/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Oct 12:14:00 PM Possible Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead East West Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 3304 E856692 46.27061611 -119.1839015 BURDEN BLVD 0 N ROAD 68 11/3/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Nov 11:35:00 AM No Apparent Injury 2 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Left Turn East South Making Left Turn East South 3581 E856739 46.27061611 -119.1839015 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 11/3/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Nov 5:20:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From opposite direction - one left turn - one right turn At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Making Right Turn West South Making Left Turn East South 3582 E862365 46.27061611 -119.1839015 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 11/15/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Nov 4:33:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead West East Going Straight Ahead South North 3268 E862370 46.27062333 -119.1832952 BURDEN BLVD 7200 11/17/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Nov 9:24:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead East West Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 3583 E863395 46.27061611 -119.1839015 N ROAD 68 0 BURDEN BLVD 11/21/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Nov 4:56:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Starting in Traffic Lane South North Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign South North 3546 E863397 46.27054865 -119.1838756 N ROAD 68 9800 11/21/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Nov 5:14:00 PM No Apparent Injury 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Going Straight Ahead South North Going Straight Ahead South North 3547 E865940 46.27048239 -119.1838503 N ROAD 68 4700 11/23/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Nov 2:48:00 PM No Apparent Injury 3 From opposite direction - all others Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Raining Wet Daylight 0 Lane of Primary Trafficway Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped Making Left Turn East South Pa g e 1 7 1 o f 2 6 9 Collision Type (First) Contributing Circumstance (Veh 1) Day of Date Junction Relationship Lighting Conditions Ped or Bike Involved Report Num Road Surface Conditions Roadway Characteristic Severity Intersection Related Lane Departure Indicator Speeding Driver Indicator Year LAT Long 24 Hr Time Block Number Date FID Most Severe Injury Type Primary Trafficway Veh 1 Action Veh 1 Compass Direction From Veh 1 Compass Direction To Veh 1 Mv Driver Age Veh 1 Mv Driver Contributing Circumstance 2 Veh 1 Mv Driver Injury Type Veh 2 Action Veh 2 Compass Direction From Veh 2 Compass Direction To Veh 2 Mv Driver Age Veh 2 Mv Driver Contributing Circumstance 1 Veh 2 Mv Driver Injury Type Veh 2 Mv Driver Misc Action 1 Weather Year 1 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 6-Dec-21 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Dark-Street Lights On Neither EB98186 Dry No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2021 46.27092974 -119.1840179 12/30/1899 6:34:00 PM 4800 12/6/2021 448557 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead North South 67 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 43 None No Apparent Injury Overcast 2021 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Unknown Distraction 15-Oct-21 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EB78896 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2021 46.27088225 -119.1840005 12/30/1899 4:14:00 PM 4800 10/15/2021 448558 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead North South 25 Follow Too Closely No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic North Vehicle Stopped 44 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Improper Turn/Merge 25-Oct-21 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EB82567 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2021 46.27008022 -119.1836997 12/30/1899 3:03:00 PM 4800 10/25/2021 448545 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Changing Lanes South North 53 No Apparent Injury Changing Lanes South North 59 None No Apparent Injury Overcast 2021 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight Unknown Distraction 29-Oct-22 At Intersection and Related Dark-Street Lights On Neither EC98492 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 11:03:00 PM 4802 10/29/2022 551936 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead South North 26 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn North East 18 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe None 15-Oct-22 At Intersection and Related Dark-Street Lights On Neither EC93726 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 12:09:00 AM 10/15/2022 551543 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Making Left Turn East South 34 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn East South 64 Improper Turn/Merge Unknown Clear 2022 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe None 3-Jul-22 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EC63983 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 2:14:00 PM 7/3/2022 551544 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Making Left Turn East South 47 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn East South 55 Improper Turn/Merge No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe Improper Turn/Merge 25-Jul-22 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EC67662 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 11:12:00 AM 7/25/2022 551547 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Making Left Turn East South 69 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn East South 29 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 20-Aug-22 At Intersection and Related Dark-Street Lights On Neither EC76157 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 1:13:00 AM 8/20/2022 551548 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East West 47 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 24 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Other Distractions 11-Aug-22 At Intersection and Related Dawn Neither EC75167 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27065828 -119.1841397 12/30/1899 5:22:00 AM 7200 8/11/2022 551546 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead West North 33 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic West North 55 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2022 Same direction -- both turning right -- one stopped -- rear end Follow Too Closely 2-Feb-19 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither E890418 Wet Curve & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27062109 -119.1834637 12/30/1899 3:05:00 PM 2400 2/2/2019 250079 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Making Right Turn South East 54 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic South East 18 None No Apparent Injury Stopped in process of turning Overcast 2019 From opposite direction - one stopped - head-on Driver Adjusting Audio or Entertainment 8-Sep-19 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither E958006 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27062755 -119.183164 12/30/1899 11:51:00 AM 9/8/2019 250064 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East West 18 Follow Too Closely No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 58 None No Apparent Injury Stopped in line of traffic Overcast 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Operating Handheld Cell Phone 7-Sep-19 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither E957879 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27031903 -119.183788 12/30/1899 3:32:00 PM 4700 9/7/2019 250376 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead South North 34 Follow Too Closely No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 38 None No Apparent Injury Stopped in line of traffic Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Other Distractions 21-Aug-20 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Dusk Neither EA57716 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27029237 -119.1837781 12/30/1899 7:58:00 PM 4800 8/21/2020 359967 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Changing Lanes South North 18 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead South North 24 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Exceeding Reas. Safe Speed 15-Feb-19 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither E894399 Snow/Slush Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No Yes 2019 46.27061611 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 12:50:00 PM 0 2/15/2019 250104 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East West 43 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 25 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From opposite direction - one left turn - one right turn Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle 11-Feb-20 At Intersection and Related Dark-Street Lights On Neither EA14367 Dry No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27061609 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 6:40:00 PM 0 2/11/2020 359743 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Making Right Turn West South 39 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn East South 42 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2020 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Follow Too Closely 13-Aug-21 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EB58074 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2021 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 7:22:00 PM 8/13/2021 448311 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East South 42 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead East South 64 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 8-Mar-20 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EA21736 Dry Straight & Level Possible Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27061609 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 12:05:00 PM 0 3/8/2020 359989 Possible Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead South North 29 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 36 None Possible Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Operating Defective Equipment 7-Jul-21 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EB47522 Dry Straight & Level Possible Injury Yes No No 2021 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 7:38:00 PM 4802 7/7/2021 448595 Possible Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead North South 34 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign North South 18 None Possible Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 Metal Sign Post Exceeding Reas. Safe Speed 12-Nov-19 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither E981682 Wet Curve & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No Yes 2019 46.27062403 -119.1832728 12/30/1899 12:15:00 PM 7200 11/12/2019 250382 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Making Right Turn South East 22 No Apparent Injury Raining 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Inattention 23-Jul-19 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither E943082 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27018935 -119.1837401 12/30/1899 5:40:00 PM 4700 7/23/2019 250363 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead South North 17 Follow Too Closely No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 26 None No Apparent Injury Stopped in line of traffic Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Inattention 4-Aug-19 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither E947995 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27010149 -119.1837076 12/30/1899 6:30:00 PM 4600 8/4/2019 250366 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Changing Lanes South North 28 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead South North 36 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 28-Aug-19 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither E954607 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27069449 -119.1839311 12/30/1899 12:53:00 PM 4700 8/28/2019 250374 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead North South 47 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 20 None No Apparent Injury Stopped in line of traffic Fog or Smog or Smoke 2019 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Distracted by Adjusting Vehicle Cntrls 27-Dec-20 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EA93109 Wet Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27061946 -119.1836051 12/30/1899 1:16:00 PM 1900 12/27/2020 359711 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East West 22 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead East West 21 None No Apparent Injury Overcast 2020 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 14-Nov-20 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Dark-Street Lights On Neither EA81280 Wet Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27060989 -119.1831176 12/30/1899 6:20:00 PM 7200 11/14/2020 359720 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East West 17 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 42 None No Apparent Injury Raining 2020 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Eating or Drinking 4-Mar-22 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EC25853 Dry Straight & Level Possible Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27062059 -119.1835063 12/30/1899 5:04:00 PM 3/4/2022 551520 Possible Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East West 18 Follow Too Closely No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 49 None Possible Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Follow Too Closely 20-Jun-22 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EC58004 Dry Straight & Level Possible Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27062059 -119.1835063 12/30/1899 4:12:00 PM 6/20/2022 551510 Possible Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East West 55 No Apparent Injury Slowing East West 40 None Possible Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - sideswipe Unknown Distraction 25-Feb-22 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EC28117 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 11:59:00 AM 2/25/2022 551937 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 40 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead South North 58 Unknown Distraction No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 11-Feb-22 At Intersection and Related Dusk Neither EC19480 Dry No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 3:54:00 PM 2/11/2022 551545 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East West 27 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign East West 43 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2022 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Improper Turn/Merge 24-Dec-19 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither E998390 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27029868 -119.1837804 12/30/1899 2:06:00 PM 4800 12/24/2019 250371 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Changing Lanes South West 51 No Apparent Injury Starting in Traffic Lane South North 48 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Follow Too Closely 27-Feb-22 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EC26808 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27061965 -119.184297 12/30/1899 4:07:00 PM 7200 2/27/2022 551513 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Slowing West East 25 No Apparent Injury Slowing West East 44 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Distractions Outside Vehicle 15-Feb-22 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Dusk Neither EC20873 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27025367 -119.1837638 12/30/1899 5:11:00 PM 4800 2/15/2022 551883 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead North South 64 Follow Too Closely No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 28 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle 7-Jun-22 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EC53674 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27021861 -119.1837509 12/30/1899 12:54:00 PM 4800 6/7/2022 551893 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Starting in Traffic Lane South North 61 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic South North 20 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 Entering at angle Exceeding Reas. Safe Speed 29-Jan-22 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EC17040 Dry Straight & Level Suspected Serious Injury Yes No Yes 2022 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 12:52:00 PM 4802 1/29/2022 551935 Suspected Serious Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead South North 24 Disregard Traffic Sign and Signals Suspected Serious Injury Making Left Turn East South 37 None Suspected Serious Injury Clear 2022 Pa g e 1 7 2 o f 2 6 9 Collision Type (First) Contributing Circumstance (Veh 1) Day of Date Junction Relationship Lighting Conditions Ped or Bike Involved Report Num Road Surface Conditions Roadway Characteristic Severity Intersection Related Lane Departure Indicator Speeding Driver Indicator Year LAT Long 24 Hr Time Block Number Date FID Most Severe Injury Type Primary Trafficway Veh 1 Action Veh 1 Compass Direction From Veh 1 Compass Direction To Veh 1 Mv Driver Age Veh 1 Mv Driver Contributing Circumstance 2 Veh 1 Mv Driver Injury Type Veh 2 Action Veh 2 Compass Direction From Veh 2 Compass Direction To Veh 2 Mv Driver Age Veh 2 Mv Driver Contributing Circumstance 1 Veh 2 Mv Driver Injury Type Veh 2 Mv Driver Misc Action 1 Weather Year 1 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight Improper Turn/Merge 27-Mar-22 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EC33611 Dry Straight & Level Suspected Serious Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 2:41:00 PM 4802 3/27/2022 551934 Suspected Serious Injury N ROAD 68 Making Left Turn North East 54 Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead South North 23 None Suspected Serious Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Follow Too Closely 22-Sep-21 At Intersection and Not Related Dark-Street Lights On Neither EB70597 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No No 2021 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 10:05:00 PM 7204 9/22/2021 448310 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East West 20 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead East West 17 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 Same direction -- both turning right -- one stopped -- rear end Follow Too Closely 21-Jul-21 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EB50848 Dry No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2021 46.27062169 -119.1834097 12/30/1899 11:48:00 AM 7/21/2021 448597 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Making Right Turn South North 59 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 58 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2021 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 10-Jun-21 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EB38858 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2021 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 3:45:00 PM 4802 6/10/2021 448596 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead North South 19 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 39 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 14-Apr-21 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EB23551 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2021 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 3:25:00 PM 4802 4/14/2021 448598 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead South North 22 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 56 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 10-Aug-20 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EA54442 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27061609 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 12:37:00 PM 7204 8/10/2020 359741 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East East 19 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 34 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Distracted by Other Occupant 14-Jul-20 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EA48072 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27066141 -119.1836305 12/30/1899 12:43:00 PM 2600 7/14/2020 359744 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Starting in Traffic Lane East West 26 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign East North 44 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 Entering at angle Inattention 27-Oct-19 At Intersection and Related Dark-Street Lights On Neither E976749 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27061609 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 7:01:00 PM 0 10/27/2019 250107 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead North South 31 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead East West 35 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end None 3-Oct-20 At Intersection and Related Dusk Neither EA70694 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27061609 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 8:04:00 PM 10/3/2020 359742 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 26 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead West East 27 Follow Too Closely No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight Distractions Outside Vehicle 14-Nov-20 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EA84038 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27061687 -119.1839001 12/30/1899 7:06:00 AM 4802 11/14/2020 359991 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead South North 57 Disregard Traffic Sign and Signals No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn North East 39 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Other Distractions 4-May-21 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EB32777 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2021 46.27088225 -119.1840005 12/30/1899 4:09:00 PM 4800 5/4/2021 448533 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead North South 57 Follow Too Closely No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic North Vehicle Stopped 61 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Improper Turn/Merge 8-May-21 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EB28545 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2021 46.27041793 -119.1838256 12/30/1899 1:00:00 PM 4800 5/8/2021 448538 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Changing Lanes South North 19 No Apparent Injury Changing Lanes South North 21 Improper Turn/Merge No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Distractions Outside Vehicle 19-Aug-21 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EB59859 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2021 46.27061928 -119.1846923 12/30/1899 5:21:00 PM 7200 8/19/2021 448286 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead West East 22 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 18 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 16-Oct-19 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither E971464 Dry Straight & Level Possible Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27062089 -119.1844946 12/30/1899 5:51:00 PM 7200 10/16/2019 250070 Possible Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead West East 24 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 43 None Possible Injury Stopped in line of traffic Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Follow Too Closely 19-Oct-21 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Dark-Street Lights On Neither EB82799 Dry No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2021 46.2711015 -119.1840809 12/30/1899 8:20:00 PM 4800 10/19/2021 448534 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead North South 37 No Apparent Injury Slowing North South 42 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2021 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 10-Nov-21 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Dark-Street Lights On Neither EB88071 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2021 46.27062323 -119.1832983 12/30/1899 5:20:00 PM 7200 11/10/2021 448289 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East West 31 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 18 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 5-Apr-19 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither E908780 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27061611 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 9:01:00 AM 0 4/5/2019 250105 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East West 22 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 33 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- rear end Smoking 8-May-19 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither E919017 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27061611 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 2:11:00 PM 0 5/8/2019 250108 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Making Left Turn East South 18 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn East South 39 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From opposite direction - one left turn - one right turn Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle 13-Apr-19 At Intersection and Related Dark-Street Lights On Neither E911660 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27061611 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 9:08:00 PM 0 4/13/2019 250109 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Making Right Turn West South 16 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn East South 70 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 25-Aug-19 At Intersection and Related Dark-Street Lights On Neither E953418 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27061611 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 8:25:00 PM 0 8/25/2019 250407 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead South North 16 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 45 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe None 30-Jul-20 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither EA51609 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27061609 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 6:50:00 PM 0 7/30/2020 359990 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Making Left Turn South West 26 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn South West 63 Improper Turn/Merge No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle 26-Aug-19 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither E954779 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27061611 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 7:52:00 PM 0 8/26/2019 250106 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Changing Lanes East West 62 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead East West 50 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Follow Too Closely 19-Jul-19 At Intersection and Related Daylight Neither E941752 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27061611 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 6:23:00 PM 0 7/19/2019 250406 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead North South 67 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead North South 18 None No Apparent Injury Slowing for traffic signal or stop sign Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 6-May-19 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither E917839 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27062038 -119.183526 12/30/1899 9:54:00 AM 3500 5/6/2019 250063 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Going Straight Ahead East West 32 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 25 None No Apparent Injury Stopped for another vehicle Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 31-May-20 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EA37078 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27114632 -119.1840974 12/30/1899 11:37:00 AM 4800 5/31/2020 359966 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead North South 36 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 45 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle 30-May-20 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EA36923 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27022577 -119.1837535 12/30/1899 9:02:00 AM 4800 5/30/2020 359960 No Apparent Injury N ROAD 68 Changing Lanes South North 26 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead South North 20 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Distracted by Adjusting Vehicle Cntrls 12-May-20 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EA33631 Dry Straight & Level No Apparent Injury Yes No No 2020 46.27061656 -119.1841389 12/30/1899 6:30:00 PM 7200 5/12/2020 359716 No Apparent Injury BURDEN BLVD Starting in Traffic Lane West South 33 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic West South 28 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Inattention 18-Aug-19 At Intersection and Related Dark-Street Lights On Neither E953078 Dry Straight & Level Suspected Minor Injury Yes No No 2019 46.27061611 -119.1839015 12/30/1899 8:28:00 PM 0 8/18/2019 250408 Suspected Minor Injury N ROAD 68 Going Straight Ahead South North 37 Follow Too Closely No Apparent Injury Starting in Traffic Lane South North 32 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 12-Jul-22 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Daylight Neither EC64404 Dry Straight & Level Possible Injury Yes No No 2022 46.27021136 -119.1837482 12/30/1899 9:44:00 AM 4800 7/12/2022 551906 Possible Injury N ROAD 68 Starting in Traffic Lane South North 42 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic South Vehicle Stopped 45 None Possible Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 Pa g e 1 7 3 o f 2 6 9 CITY OF PASCO RED LIGHT RUNNING CAMERAS EVALUATION • PHASE 3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • DECEMBER 2024 APPENDIX D: COURT STREET AND 20TH AVENUE CRASH DATA Page 174 of 269 FID_ REPORT_NUM LAT LONG INDEXED_PR PRIMARY_TR BLOCK_NUMB INTERSECTI DATE YEAR QTR_NUM MONTH 24_HR_TIME FULL_TIME MOST_SEV_1 FIRST_COLL JUNCTION_R WEATHER ROAD_SURFA LIGHTING_C VEH_1_ACTI VEH_1_COMP VEH_1_CO_1 VEH_2_ACTI VEH_2_COMP VEH_2_CO_1 502 E389988 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 1/5/2015 0:00 2015 Q1 Jan 5:23:00 PM 5:23:00 PM Possible Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dusk Making Right Turn East North Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 186 E396964 46.24155791 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 W COURT ST 1/31/2015 0:00 2015 Q1 Jan 2:28:00 PM 2:28:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Overcast Dry Daylight Slowing North South Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 172 E404381 46.24098694 -119.1173951 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 CARTMELL ST 3/1/2015 0:00 2015 Q1 Mar 2:47:00 PM 2:47:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead South North Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 503 E434747 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 6/15/2015 0:00 2015 Q2 Jun 11:35:00 AM 11:35:00 AM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Slowing East West Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 177 E443807 46.2421006 -119.1173283 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1500 COURT ST ALLEY 7/17/2015 0:00 2015 Q3 Jul 12:10:00 PM 12:10:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - one right turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead South North Making Right Turn South East 504 E448306 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 8/2/2015 0:00 2015 Q3 Aug 3:11:00 PM 3:11:00 PM No Apparent Injury One car leaving parked position At Driveway within Major Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Backing Vehicle Backing Vehicle Backing Going Straight Ahead West East 505 E448505 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 7/31/2015 0:00 2015 Q3 Jul 1:20:00 PM 1:20:00 PM Possible Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead East West Slowing East West 506 E454750 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 8/21/2015 0:00 2015 Q3 Aug 7:19:00 PM 7:19:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead West East Slowing West East 507 E455862 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 8/26/2015 0:00 2015 Q3 Aug 4:42:00 PM 4:42:00 PM No Apparent Injury Same direction -- both turning left -- both moving -- sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Making Left Turn South West Making Left Turn South West 84 E469152 46.24155791 -119.1173861 COURT ST COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 10/6/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Oct 3:08:00 PM 3:08:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead West East Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign West Vehicle Stopped 187 E469153 46.24155791 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 W COURT ST 10/7/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Oct 3:10:00 PM 3:10:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead South North Making Left Turn North East 188 E469841 46.24155791 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 W COURT ST 10/10/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Oct 4:24:00 PM 4:24:00 PM Possible Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Overcast Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead South North Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 167 E473393 46.24187467 -119.1174676 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 10/21/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Oct 1:37:00 PM 1:37:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Changing Lanes North South Going Straight Ahead North South 176 E474579 46.24098691 -119.1173951 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 CARTMELL ST 10/21/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Oct 1:30:00 PM 1:30:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - sideswipe At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead South North Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 168 E476636 46.24128345 -119.1173904 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 10/27/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Oct 6:02:00 PM 6:02:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dusk Changing Lanes South North Going Straight Ahead South North 508 E478069 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 10/31/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Oct 8:06:00 PM 8:06:00 PM Suspected Minor Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Raining Wet Dark-Street Lights On Making Left Turn West North Going Straight Ahead East West 509 E481045 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 11/10/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Nov 3:44:00 PM 3:44:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Making Left Turn West North Going Straight Ahead East West 510 E490381 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 12/5/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Dec 1:42:00 PM 1:42:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead East West Going Straight Ahead East West 189 E494501 46.24155791 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 W COURT ST 12/16/2015 0:00 2015 Q4 Dec 6:49:00 PM 6:49:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one right turn At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On Making Right Turn South East Making Left Turn North East 1499 E527692 46.2415529 -119.1169917 W COURT ST W COURT ST 1900 3/22/2016 0:00 2016 Q1 Mar 11:40:00 AM 11:40:00 AM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Overcast Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead East West Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 1180 E527694 46.24155791 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 W COURT ST 3/15/2016 0:00 2016 Q1 Mar 2:40:00 PM 2:40:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead North South Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 1538 E544935 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 5/17/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 May 12:18:00 PM 12:18:00 PM No Apparent Injury Entering at angle At Driveway within Major Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Making Left Turn North East Going Straight Ahead East West 1539 E547100 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 5/24/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 May 5:05:00 PM 5:05:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one right turn At Driveway within Major Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Making Left Turn South Northwest Making Right Turn North Southwest 1540 E552024 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 6/9/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 Jun 3:54:00 PM 3:54:00 PM Possible Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead West East Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 1541 E552079 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 6/8/2016 0:00 2016 Q2 Jun 6:36:00 PM 6:36:00 PM Possible Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Slowing West East Slowing West East 1181 E571790 46.24155791 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 W COURT ST 8/8/2016 0:00 2016 Q3 Aug 7:15:00 PM 7:15:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dusk Going Straight Ahead North South Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 1542 E572270 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 8/9/2016 0:00 2016 Q3 Aug 2:35:00 PM 2:35:00 PM Suspected Minor Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead East West Slowing East West 1543 E602928 46.24155791 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 N 20TH AVE 10/31/2016 0:00 2016 Q4 Oct 6:23:00 PM 6:23:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Wet Dark-Street Lights On Making Left Turn East South Going Straight Ahead West East 2320 E629040 46.24213586 -119.1173547 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1500 BETWEEN W COURT ST AND W RUBY ST 1/4/2017 0:00 2017 Q1 Jan 4:03:00 PM 4:03:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - one right turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Snow/Slush Daylight Changing Lanes South North Making Right Turn South East 2323 E636511 46.24155789 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 1/28/2017 0:00 2017 Q1 Jan 4:48:00 PM 4:48:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dusk Going Straight Ahead South North Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 2312 E639607 46.24183173 -119.1173732 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 2/6/2017 0:00 2017 Q1 Feb 4:16:00 PM 4:16:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Changing Lanes North South Going Straight Ahead North South 2324 E641579 46.24155789 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 2/11/2017 0:00 2017 Q1 Feb 10:55:00 PM 10:55:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On Starting in Traffic Lane North South Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 2303 E651173 46.24115147 -119.1173924 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 3/13/2017 0:00 2017 Q1 Mar 3:21:00 PM 3:21:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Raining Wet Daylight Going Straight Ahead South North Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped Pa g e 1 7 5 o f 2 6 9 FID_ REPORT_NUM LAT LONG INDEXED_PR PRIMARY_TR BLOCK_NUMB INTERSECTI DATE YEAR QTR_NUM MONTH 24_HR_TIME FULL_TIME MOST_SEV_1 FIRST_COLL JUNCTION_R WEATHER ROAD_SURFA LIGHTING_C VEH_1_ACTI VEH_1_COMP VEH_1_CO_1 VEH_2_ACTI VEH_2_COMP VEH_2_CO_1 2313 E654707 46.24128345 -119.1173904 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 1400 3/24/2017 0:00 2017 Q1 Mar 8:20:00 AM 8:20:00 AM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Not at Intersection and Not Related Raining Wet Daylight Changing Lanes South North Going Straight Ahead South North 2325 E661566 46.24155789 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 4/14/2017 0:00 2017 Q2 Apr 3:23:00 PM 3:23:00 PM Possible Injury Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Overcast Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead East West Going Straight Ahead South North 2326 E667411 46.24155789 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 4/24/2017 0:00 2017 Q2 Apr 2:35:00 PM 2:35:00 PM Possible Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end At Intersection and Related Overcast Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead North South Going Straight Ahead North South 2648 E674607 46.24155488 -119.1171506 W COURT ST W COURT ST 1900 5/25/2017 0:00 2017 Q2 May 6:51:00 PM 6:51:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Starting From Parked Position East West Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 2327 E674939 46.24155789 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 5/23/2017 0:00 2017 Q2 May 9:17:00 AM 9:17:00 AM Possible Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead North South Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 2688 E719199 46.24155789 -119.1173861 W COURT ST W COURT ST 0 N 20TH AVE 10/1/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Oct 11:53:00 AM 11:53:00 AM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Making Left Turn North East Going Straight Ahead South North 2328 E719960 46.24155789 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 10/6/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Oct 4:13:00 PM 4:13:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead South North Making Left Turn North East 2653 E720000 46.24152041 -119.1178024 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 9/25/2017 0:00 2017 Q3 Sep 5:23:00 PM 5:23:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Changing Lanes North East Going Straight Ahead North East 2329 E721440 46.24155789 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 10/5/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Oct 7:08:00 PM 7:08:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On Making Left Turn North East Going Straight Ahead South North 2330 E722471 46.24155789 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 10/11/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Oct 8:33:00 PM 8:33:00 PM Possible Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On Making Left Turn North East Going Straight Ahead South North 2331 E725499 46.24155789 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 10/15/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Oct 6:46:00 PM 6:46:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On Making Left Turn South West Going Straight Ahead North South 2332 E725500 46.24155789 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 10/14/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Oct 7:08:00 PM 7:08:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On Making Left Turn South West Going Straight Ahead North South 2655 E726598 46.24153876 -119.1172294 W COURT ST W COURT ST 1900 10/24/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Oct 11:30:00 AM 11:30:00 AM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead West East Stopped in Roadway West Vehicle Stopped 2333 E729972 46.24155789 -119.1173861 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 10/30/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Oct 9:34:00 PM 9:34:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On Making Right Turn North West Going Straight Ahead South North 2656 E739081 46.24153705 -119.1171069 W COURT ST W COURT ST 1900 11/22/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Nov 3:03:00 PM 3:03:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Overcast Wet Daylight Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped Going Straight Ahead East West 2657 E743550 46.24153529 -119.117984 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 12/5/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Dec 10:45:00 AM 10:45:00 AM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Changing Lanes West East Going Straight Ahead West East 2334 E747062 46.24154121 -119.1174022 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 12/13/2017 0:00 2017 Q4 Dec 7:28:00 AM 7:28:00 AM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Overcast Wet Daylight Making Left Turn South West Going Straight Ahead North South 3433 E760631 46.24154121 -119.1174022 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 1/20/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Jan 1:15:00 PM 1:15:00 PM Possible Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Making Left Turn South West Going Straight Ahead North South 3737 E770077 46.24155146 -119.1181992 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 2/16/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Feb 5:14:00 PM 5:14:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead West East Slowing West East 3785 E773160 46.24154121 -119.1174022 W COURT ST W COURT ST 0 N 20TH AVE 2/23/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Feb 6:10:00 AM 6:10:00 AM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - all others At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dawn Making U-Turn West West Going Straight Ahead West East 3434 E776273 46.24154121 -119.1174022 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 3/1/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Mar 3:56:00 PM 3:56:00 PM Possible Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Overcast Wet Dark-Street Lights On Making Left Turn North East Going Straight Ahead South North 3435 E776413 46.24154121 -119.1174022 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 2/26/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Feb 10:48:00 AM 10:48:00 AM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Making Left Turn South West Going Straight Ahead North South 3738 E781227 46.24153792 -119.1177984 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 3/20/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Mar 2:58:00 PM 2:58:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead West East Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 3786 E783965 46.24154121 -119.1174022 W COURT ST W COURT ST 0 N 20TH AVE 3/28/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Mar 5:51:00 PM 5:51:00 PM Possible Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead West South Stopped for Traffic West South 3787 E783970 46.24154121 -119.1174022 W COURT ST W COURT ST 0 N 20TH AVE 3/30/2018 0:00 2018 Q1 Mar 4:22:00 PM 4:22:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Making Left Turn West North Going Straight Ahead East West 3436 E793763 46.24154121 -119.1174022 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 5/1/2018 0:00 2018 Q2 May 1:55:00 PM 1:55:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead North South Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 3437 E800585 46.24154121 -119.1174022 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 5/17/2018 0:00 2018 Q2 May 2:10:00 PM 2:10:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Making Left Turn North East Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 3438 E806155 46.24154121 -119.1174022 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 6/8/2018 0:00 2018 Q2 Jun 6:50:00 PM 6:50:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - sideswipe At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead South North Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 3439 E816878 46.24154121 -119.1174022 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 7/7/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Jul 11:24:00 AM 11:24:00 AM Possible Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Making Left Turn South West Going Straight Ahead North South 3788 E826312 46.24154121 -119.1174022 W COURT ST W COURT ST 0 N 20TH AVE 8/6/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Aug 4:26:00 PM 4:26:00 PM Possible Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead West East Going Straight Ahead West East 3789 E836591 46.24154121 -119.1174022 W COURT ST W COURT ST 0 N 20TH AVE 8/16/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Aug 4:27:00 PM 4:27:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead West East Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign West Vehicle Stopped 3440 E838131 46.24154121 -119.1174022 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 9/10/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Sep 7:10:00 AM 7:10:00 AM Possible Injury Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead North South Going Straight Ahead North South 3790 E838457 46.24154121 -119.1174022 W COURT ST W COURT ST 0 N 20TH AVE 9/14/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Sep 1:00:00 PM 1:00:00 PM Possible Injury Entering at angle At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Going Straight Ahead East West Going Straight Ahead North South 3791 E838969 46.24154121 -119.1174022 W COURT ST W COURT ST 0 N 20TH AVE 9/15/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Sep 6:20:00 PM 6:20:00 PM Suspected Minor Injury Vehicle going straight hits pedestrian At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Making Right Turn East North 3741 E839903 46.24153565 -119.1170081 W COURT ST W COURT ST 1900 9/19/2018 0:00 2018 Q3 Sep 1:00:00 PM 1:00:00 PM Possible Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Starting in Traffic Lane East West Slowing East West Pa g e 1 7 6 o f 2 6 9 FID_ REPORT_NUM LAT LONG INDEXED_PR PRIMARY_TR BLOCK_NUMB INTERSECTI DATE YEAR QTR_NUM MONTH 24_HR_TIME FULL_TIME MOST_SEV_1 FIRST_COLL JUNCTION_R WEATHER ROAD_SURFA LIGHTING_C VEH_1_ACTI VEH_1_COMP VEH_1_CO_1 VEH_2_ACTI VEH_2_COMP VEH_2_CO_1 3743 E862362 46.2415379 -119.1177996 W COURT ST W COURT ST 2000 11/11/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Nov 6:09:00 PM 6:09:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Not at Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-Street Lights On Changing Lanes West East Going Straight Ahead West East 3792 E863396 46.24154121 -119.1174022 W COURT ST W COURT ST 0 N 20TH AVE 11/21/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Nov 4:29:00 PM 4:29:00 PM No Apparent Injury From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe At Intersection and Not Related Overcast Dry Dusk Changing Lanes West East Going Straight Ahead West East 3793 E865805 46.24154121 -119.1174022 W COURT ST W COURT ST 0 N 20TH AVE 11/28/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Nov 5:55:00 PM 5:55:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Raining Wet Dark-Street Lights On Making Left Turn West North Going Straight Ahead East West 3441 E872492 46.24154121 -119.1174022 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 12/5/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Dec 8:18:00 PM 8:18:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Dark-No Street Lights Making Left Turn South West Going Straight Ahead North South 3442 E875822 46.24154121 -119.1174022 N 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE 0 W COURT ST 12/19/2018 0:00 2018 Q4 Dec 2:39:00 PM 2:39:00 PM No Apparent Injury From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dry Daylight Making Left Turn South West Going Straight Ahead North South Pa g e 1 7 7 o f 2 6 9 Collision Type (First)Contributing Circumstance (Veh 1)Day of Date Day of Week Junction Relationship Ped or Bike InvolvedRoadway Characteristic Severity Lane Departure IndicatorSpeeding Driver Indicator Year LAT Long 24 Hr Time FID Most Severe Injury Type Veh 1 ActionVeh 1 Compass Direction FromVeh 1 Compass Direction ToVeh 1 Mv Driver AgeVeh 1 Mv Driver Injury TypeVeh 2 Compass Direction FromVeh 2 Compass Direction ToVeh 2 Mv Driver AgeVeh 2 Mv Driver Contributing Circumstance 1Veh 2 Mv Driver Injury TypeVeh 2 Mv Driver Misc Action 1 Weather Year 1 Entering at angle Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle 11-Oct-19 Friday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2019 46.24154121 -119.1174022 12/30/1899 2:56:00 PM 250256 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn North East 18 No Apparent Injury South North 37 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 23-Jul-19 Tuesday Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2019 46.24153158 -119.1167159 12/30/1899 3:56:00 PM 250563 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead East West 18 No Apparent Injury Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 33 None No Apparent Injury Stopped in line of traffic Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 22-May-20 Friday Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2020 46.24167762 -119.1173937 12/30/1899 4:26:00 PM 359857 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead North South 27 No Apparent Injury North South 52 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle 6-Jan-20 Monday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2020 46.24154119 -119.1174022 12/30/1899 2:47:00 PM 360158 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn North East 47 No Apparent Injury South North 27 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight None 1-Feb-19 Friday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2019 46.24154121 -119.1174022 12/30/1899 4:08:00 PM 250255 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead North South 37 No Apparent Injury South West 61 None No Apparent Injury Overcast 2019 Entering at angle Disregard Traffic Sign and Signals 13-May-20 Wednesday At Intersection and Related Neither No Apparent Injury No No 2020 46.24154119 -119.1174022 12/30/1899 2:20:00 PM 360160 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn West North 74 No Apparent Injury North East 51 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight Unknown Distraction 27-Jul-22 Wednesday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level Suspected Minor Injury No No 2022 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 12:22:00 PM 551754 Suspected Minor Injury Going Straight Ahead West East 58 Suspected Minor Injury East South 26 Unknown Distraction Suspected Minor Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight None 30-Nov-22 Wednesday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level Possible Injury No No 2022 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 5:50:00 PM 551752 Possible Injury Going Straight Ahead North South 21 No Apparent Injury South West 18 Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle Possible Injury Overcast 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 26-Aug-20 Wednesday Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2020 46.24153792 -119.11783 12/30/1899 3:33:00 PM 360136 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead West West 47 No Apparent Injury Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 45 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - sideswipe Improper Turn/Merge 20-Dec-20 Sunday Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2020 46.24153823 -119.1179796 12/30/1899 4:36:00 PM 360135 No Apparent Injury Changing Lanes West East 52 No Apparent Injury West West 47 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2020 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight Inattention 1-Sep-19 Sunday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2019 46.24154121 -119.1174022 12/30/1899 3:16:00 PM 250258 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn South West 52 No Apparent Injury North South 36 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 Entering at angle Disregard Traffic Sign and Signals 31-Jan-20 Friday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level Possible Injury No No 2020 46.24154119 -119.1174022 12/30/1899 7:14:00 AM 359867 Possible Injury Going Straight Ahead West East 40 Possible Injury North South 29 None Possible Injury Clear 2020 Entering at angle Disregard Traffic Sign and Signals 26-May-21 Wednesday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2021 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 8:40:00 PM 448835 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead West East 33 No Apparent Injury South North 19 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight Improper Turn/Merge 28-Aug-21 Saturday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level Possible Injury No No 2021 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 2:59:00 PM 448439 Possible Injury Making Left Turn North East 67 No Apparent Injury South North 23 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2021 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end None 15-Oct-21 Friday Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2021 46.24153704 -119.1171066 12/30/1899 7:34:00 PM 448784 No Apparent Injury Stopped for Traffic Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 54 No Apparent Injury East West 46 Follow Too Closely No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Other Driver Distractions Inside Vehicle 31-May-19 Friday Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2019 46.24165021 -119.1173954 12/30/1899 9:50:00 AM 250240 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead North South 34 No Apparent Injury Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 49 None No Apparent Injury Stopped for another vehicle Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 3-May-22 Tuesday At Intersection and Related Neither No Apparent Injury No No 2022 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 12:15:00 PM 551748 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead North South 19 No Apparent Injury Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 48 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end None 26-Apr-22 Tuesday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2022 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 3:05:00 PM 551749 No Apparent Injury Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 19 No Apparent Injury Other Contributing Circ Not Listed Unknown Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight Disregard Traffic Sign and Signals 5-Jun-22 Sunday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2022 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 4:35:00 PM 551750 No Apparent Injury Making Left Turn North East 25 No Apparent Injury South North 47 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Driver Interacting with Passengers, Anim 12-Dec-19 Thursday Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Neither Straight & Level Possible Injury No No 2019 46.24153841 -119.1172057 12/30/1899 7:00:00 PM 250565 Possible Injury Starting in Traffic Lane Vehicle Stopped West 19 No Apparent Injury Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 25 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Follow Too Closely 17-Dec-22 Saturday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2022 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 4:15:00 PM 551751 No Apparent Injury Slowing North South 62 No Apparent Injury North West 35 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2022 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle 15-Apr-19 Monday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level Possible Injury No No 2019 46.24154121 -119.1174022 12/30/1899 2:28:00 PM 250257 Possible Injury Going Straight Ahead North South 20 Possible Injury South West 38 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 2-Sep-22 Friday At Intersection and Related Neither No Apparent Injury No No 2022 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 2:40:00 PM 552199 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead West East 35 No Apparent Injury Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 34 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2022 Breakage of any part of the vehicle resulting in injury or in further property damage Operating Defective Equipment 21-Jan-22 Friday At Intersection and Related Neither No Apparent Injury No No 2022 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 4:55:00 AM 552201 No Apparent Injury Making Right Turn North West 62 No Apparent Injury Clear 2022 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Lost in Thought / Day Dreaming 4-Mar-22 Friday At Intersection and Not Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2022 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 3:01:00 PM 552200 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead West East 47 No Apparent Injury West East 51 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 11-Feb-19 Monday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2019 46.24154121 -119.1174022 12/30/1899 2:39:00 PM 250254 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead North South 51 No Apparent Injury Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 50 None No Apparent Injury Snowing 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Inattention 3-Jun-19 Monday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2019 46.24154121 -119.1174022 12/30/1899 12:17:00 PM 250610 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead West East 16 No Apparent Injury Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 61 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 14-Mar-22 Monday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level Possible Injury No No 2022 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 1:47:00 PM 552198 Possible Injury Going Straight Ahead West East 36 No Apparent Injury Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 37 None Possible Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 3-Jul-22 Sunday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level Possible Injury No No 2022 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 10:32:00 PM 552202 Possible Injury Going Straight Ahead Unknown Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 26 None Possible Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Physically Impaired 16-Sep-22 Friday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level Possible Injury No No 2022 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 12:56:00 PM 551753 Possible Injury Going Straight Ahead West South 94 No Apparent Injury Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 40 None Possible Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 Entering at angle Distracted by Other Occupant 11-Jul-21 Sunday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level Suspected Minor Injury No No 2021 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 7:54:00 AM 448836 Suspected Minor Injury Going Straight Ahead East West 31 No Apparent Injury North South 47 None Suspected Minor Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 Entering at angle Improper U-Turn 6-Nov-21 Saturday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2021 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 7:30:00 PM 448437 No Apparent Injury Making U-Turn South South 22 No Apparent Injury West South 58 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2021 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear-end Eating or Drinking 29-Oct-19 Tuesday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2019 46.24154119 -119.1174022 12/30/1899 3:24:00 PM 250611 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead West East 36 No Apparent Injury West East 19 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2019 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 19-Oct-20 Monday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2020 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 9:03:00 AM 360159 No Apparent Injury Starting in Traffic Lane West East 39 No Apparent Injury Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 56 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 Entering at angle Inattention 24-Mar-19 Sunday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2019 46.24154121 -119.1174022 12/30/1899 8:15:00 AM 250609 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead South North 85 No Apparent Injury East West 57 None No Apparent Injury Raining 2019 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight None 20-Dec-21 Monday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2021 46.24153788 -119.1174036 12/30/1899 6:59:00 PM 448438 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead North South 55 No Apparent Injury South West 37 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2021 Entering at angle Unknown Distraction 24-Sep-20 Thursday At Intersection and Related Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2020 46.24154119 -119.1174022 12/30/1899 7:58:00 PM 359868 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead South North 22 No Apparent Injury West East 16 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2020 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Unknown Distraction 2-Jun-22 Thursday Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2022 46.24167764 -119.1173937 12/30/1899 4:50:00 PM 551737 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead North South Unknown Vehicle Stopped Vehicle Stopped 37 None No Apparent Injury Clear or Partly Cloudy 2022 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear-end Follow Too Closely 13-Sep-22 Tuesday Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Neither Straight & Level No Apparent Injury No No 2022 46.24125171 -119.1174124 12/30/1899 12:20:00 PM 551727 No Apparent Injury Going Straight Ahead South West 23 No Apparent Injury South West 37 None No Apparent Injury Clear 2022 Pa g e 1 7 8 o f 2 6 9 CITY OF PASCO AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM STUDY PHASE 3 AARON BERGER, PE PROJECT MANAGER adb@dksassociates.com 406.781.3029 Pa g e 1 7 9 o f 2 6 9 AGENDA 1 STUDY PURPOSE & HISTORY •2019 System Installation •2020 Phase 1 Update •2022 Phase 2 Update •2024 Phase 3 Update 2 PHASE 3 STUDY: VIOLATIONS 3 PHASE 3 STUDY: COLLISIONS 4 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS Pa g e 1 8 0 o f 2 6 9 STUDY PURPOSE: AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS Pa g e 1 8 1 o f 2 6 9 AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT INSTALLATIONS •Automated photo enforcement system installed February 2019 •N Road 68 & Burden Blvd •N 20th Ave & W Court St •Citations given since mid-August 2019 PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 4 Northbound N Rd 68 at Burden Blvd Pa g e 1 8 2 o f 2 6 9 AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT EFFECTIVENESS PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 5 Frequency of red-light running violations Frequency of traffic collisionsPa g e 1 8 3 o f 2 6 9 AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT STUDY TIMELINE PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 6 202520232021 Feb 2019 Cameras installed C T Aug 2019 Tickets issued Phase 1 Citation data collected Sep 2019 to Jul 2024 Phase 1 Study Sep 2020 Phase 2 Study June 2022 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 3 Study Dec 2024 20192018 AFTER Crash data collected 2019 to 2022 BEFORE Crash data collected 2015 to 2018 Ph.1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Pa g e 1 8 4 o f 2 6 9 AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM: PHASES 1 AND 2 PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 7 •Phase 1 study (2020) preliminary results •Violations reduced •Limited crash data showed average crash frequency reduced •Phase 2 study (2022) results •Violations had mixed results depending on location •Average crash frequency reduced Pa g e 1 8 5 o f 2 6 9 PHASE 3: RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS Pa g e 1 8 6 o f 2 6 9 CITATIONS: MONTHLY 9 Pa g e 1 8 7 o f 2 6 9 CITATIONS: DAILY 10 Pa g e 1 8 8 o f 2 6 9 CITATIONS: WEEKLY 11 Pa g e 1 8 9 o f 2 6 9 RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 12 (BY MONTH) Pa g e 1 9 0 o f 2 6 9 RED-LIGHT RUNNING CITATIONS PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 13 (BY MONTH) Drop in citations caused by camera issue Pa g e 1 9 1 o f 2 6 9 PHASE 3: BEFORE-AFTER COLLISIONS Pa g e 1 9 2 o f 2 6 9 COLLISION ANALYSIS RD 68 & BURDEN - BEFORE/AFTER PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 15 Pa g e 1 9 3 o f 2 6 9 COLLISION ANALYSIS RD 68 & BURDEN - BEFORE/AFTER – SEVERITY, TYPE PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 16 Pa g e 1 9 4 o f 2 6 9 COLLISION ANALYSIS 20TH & COURT - BEFORE/AFTER PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 17 Pa g e 1 9 5 o f 2 6 9 COLLISION ANALYSIS 20TH & COURT - BEFORE/AFTER – SEVERITY, TYPE PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 18 Pa g e 1 9 6 o f 2 6 9 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPSPa g e 1 9 7 o f 2 6 9 CONCLUSIONS PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 20 •Violations initially reduced but plateaued about two years after implementation •Fridays have the highest incidence of violations •Average crash frequency reduced •Especially angle crashes (85% reduction) and injury crashes Pa g e 1 9 8 o f 2 6 9 NEW CAMERA LOCATION VIABILITY PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 21 •Enforcement cameras are likely to decrease frequency of angle crashes •Intersections with history of angle crashes: •Court St & 22nd Ave •Road 68 & Wrigley Dr •Lewis St & 28th Ave •Sylvester St & 28th Ave Pa g e 1 9 9 o f 2 6 9 NEXT STEPS •Continue automated enforcement at these locations •Consider additional legs of these two intersections •Potential program expansion •Consider intersections with similar needs •Angle crashes, injury crashes •Locations too constrained for traditional law enforcement (high traffic volumes, lack of shoulder, etc) •Review citation data yearly to identify any anomalies in the trends PASCO RED LIGHT CAMERA PHASE 3 UPDATE 22 Pa g e 2 0 0 o f 2 6 9 THANK YOU AARON BERGER, PE PROJECT MANAGER adb@dksassociates.com 406.781.3029 Pa g e 2 0 1 o f 2 6 9 Resolution – PSA - Red Light Safety Cameras - 1 RESOLUTION NO. _________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH VERRA MOBILIY FOR RED LIGHT SAFETY CAMERAS WITH ENHANCED VIDEO SERVICRES. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) Washington; and Verra Mobility, entered into an exclusive agreement for a photo enforcement traffic program on November 20, 2018. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington; and Verra Mobility, entered into a First Amendment to the exclusive agreement for photo enforcement allowing for a month-to-month term on April 15, 2024. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington completed a red light camera study to evaluate the effectiveness of automated enforcement and the effect to traffic safety. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington desires to continue a photo enforcement program to enforce traffic violations in accordance with Washington Rev. Code §46.61.050, §46.61.050 and 46.61.055 and local ordinance Chapter 10.31. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Verra Mobility for Red Light Safety Cameras with Enhanced Video Services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Pasco and Verra Mobility as attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Professional Services Agreement on behalf of the City of Pasco. Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately. Page 202 of 269 Resolution – PSA - Red Light Safety Cameras - 2 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____, 202_. _____________________________ Pete Serrano Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorneys Page 203 of 269 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT: RED LIGHT SAFETY CAMERAS WITH ENHANCED VIDEO SERVICES: This Photo Enforcement Services Agreement includes the attached Exhibits (“Agreement”) and is made by and between American Traffic Solutions, Inc., doing business as Verra Mobility, (“Verra Mobility”) and the City of Pasco, Washinton, a municipal corporation (“Customer”). WHEREAS, Customer desires to implement a photo enforcement program to enforce traffic violations (the “Program”) in accordance with Washington Rev. Code §46.61.050, §46.61.050 and 46.61.055 and local ordinance Chapter 10.31. WHEREAS, Verra Mobility has the exclusive possession and ownership of the Back-office System “BOS”, including certain knowledge, equipment, licenses, and the processes for processing Events; WHEREAS, Customer selected Verra Mobility to provide services to implement and carry on the Customer's Program; WHEREAS, Customer desires to use the Camera Systems together with the BOS to monitor and enforce traffic Violations and to issue Citations for traffic Violations as part of its Program; WHEREAS, Customer has determined that it has the authority to enter into this Agreement in compliance with the laws, regulations, and policies applicable to it, including procurement laws, regulations, and policies. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby admitted and acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: By signing below, the parties agree to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Each individual signing below represents that such individual has the requisite authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the entity which such individual represents and that all the necessary formalities have been met. This Agreement is effective on the date of execution by the last signatory to this cover page (“Effective Date”). ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO BY: AMERICAN TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON By: By: Name: Jon Baldwin Title: Executive Vice President Date Name: Title: Date ATTEST: By: Name: Title: Page 204 of 269 I. DEFINITIONS As used in this Agreement, the following words and terms shall, unless the context otherwise requires, have the respective meanings provided below: h “Approach”: One (1) direction of travel on a road including up to four (4) contiguous lanes and, if applicable controlled by up to two (2) signal phases, on which a Camera System may be installed upon the mutual agreement of the parties. “Back -Office System” or “BOS”: The proprietary back-end system that processes Events and Violations, including the printing and mailing of Citations, the generation of evidence packages, and that provides system generated reports of Violation counts. “Business Hours”: Eight (8) hours per day, Monday through Friday, excluding weekends and holidays. “Business Rules”: The Business Rules Questionnaire to be completed by Customer and delivered to Verra Mobility setting forth the business rules for the implementation and operation of the Program. “Camera System” or “Camera”: A photo-traffic monitoring device consisting of one (1) rear camera, strobe (if applicable), and traffic monitoring device (including the wiring associated with each) capable of accurately detecting a Violation, which records such data with one (1) or more images of such vehicle. “Camera System” may refer to either a Red Light Safety Camera System or a Fixed Speed, Mobile (vehicle), or Transportable Speed Safety Camera System, depending on the context. “Change Order Notice”: Written notice from Customer requesting changes to the work required to be performed or the addition of products or services to those required pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, setting forth in reasonable detail the proposed changes. “Change Order Proposal”: A written statement from Verra Mobility describing the cost of the changes to the work or addition of products or services requested by Customer in a Change Order Notice. “Citation”: A citation, notice of violation, notice of infraction, notice of liability or equivalent instrument issued by a competent state, county or municipal law enforcement agent or agency or by a court of competent jurisdiction relating to a Violation documented or evidenced in the BOS. “Designated Safety Zone”: A designated safety zone in which a Camera System may be installed or deployed. “Event”: A potential Violation captured by the Camera System. “Fees”: The amount payable by Customer to Verra Mobility for equipment, services, and maintenance as set forth in EXHIBIT A. “Fixed Speed Safety Camera System”: A Camera System that uses radar, or other vehicle detection technology, to capture the speed of a motor vehicle and generates recorded images of a Event and is installed on a mutually agreed upon Approach. “Laws”: All federal, state, or local, laws, ordinances, regulations, and orders. “Mobile Speed Safety Camera System”: A Camera System, which is capable of capturing speed Events, installed in a Verra Mobility-provided vehicle. “Notice to Proceed”: Written confirmation from Customer that Verra Mobility may proceed with the installation or deployment of a given Camera System, a form of which is attached as EXHIBIT C. Page 205 of 269 “Owner”: The owner(s) of a motor vehicle as shown by the motor vehicle registration records of the motor vehicle department or the analogous agency of another state or country, including a lessee of a motor vehicle under a lease of six months or longer. “Paid Citation”: A situation where the Person cited has paid any portion of the penalty, fine, funds, fees or costs associated with the particular Citation. “Person” or “Persons”: Any individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, limited liability company, trust, unincorporated association, governmental authority or political subdivision thereof or any other form of entity. “Photo Enforcement Infrastructure”: The poles, foundation, conduit, and other below-grade infrastructure associated with installing Camera Systems. “Project Time Line”: The initial schedule and timelines required to begin the implementation of Customer’s project, as mutually agreed upon by the parties. The initial project timeline will be prepared assuming the active cooperation and engagement of the Program stakeholders set forth in Section 2.1.1 of EXHIBIT B. “Red Light Safety Camera System”: A Camera System that uses vehicle detection technology to capture a vehicle traversing a red light traffic signal and generates recorded images of an Event and is installed on a mutually agreed upon Approach. “System”: A Camera System and the related Photo Enforcement Infrastructure. “Transportable Speed Safety Camera System”: A Camera System, which is capable of capturing speed Events, capable of being moved from a Designated Safety Zone to another. “Violation”: A failure to obey an applicable traffic law or regulation related to a failure to obey a traffic signal or related to operating a motor vehicle in excess of the posted speed limit, as determined in Customer’s sole discretion. II. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. VERRA MOBILITY AGREES TO PROVIDE: The scope of work identified in EXHIBIT B, Section 1. 2. CUSTOMER AGREES TO PROVIDE: The scope of work identified in EXHIBIT B, Section 2. 3. TERM: This Agreement shall commence upon the Effective Date and shall continue for a term of five (5) years from the Effective Date. This Agreement will automatically extend for up to two consecutive two (2) year terms. However, Customer or Verra Mobility may terminate this Agreement at the expiration of any term by providing written notice of its intent not to extend the Agreement one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the expiration of the then-current term. 4. FEES AND PAYMENT: 4.1 Customer shall pay for all equipment, services and maintenance based on the fee schedule indicated in EXHIBIT A, Service Fee Schedule 1. 4.2 Invoices shall be in standard Verra Mobility format and provided electronically. Page 206 of 269 4.3 Customer shall pay all Fees due Verra Mobility based upon invoices from the preceding month within thirty (30) days of submission. Late payments may be subject to interest calculated at 1.5% per month on open balances. 4.4 Verra Mobility’s Fees will be fixed for the first twelve (12) months invoiced of the Agreement; thereafter, unit prices will increase annually by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), according to the average change during the prior twelve (12) months in the CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for U.S. Consumer average, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor for the Services category listed under Commodity and Service Group. 5. COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION: Verra Mobility will comply with reasonable requests from Customer for information obtained by Verra Mobility through operation of the Camera Systems or the BOS. Verra Mobility reserves the right to assess a fee for such services if such information is requested by a third-party or if Customer could retrieve the information from the BOS without the assistance of Verra Mobility. Verra Mobility will not be under any obligation to provide information directly to non-Customer requesting parties. For any non-Customer requests for information, Verra Mobility shall work collaboratively with Customer to provide requested information in a timely manner to Customer. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed contrary to the terms and provisions of any public records laws, insofar as they may be applicable. 6. CONFIDENTIALITY: No information given by Verra Mobility to Customer will be of a confidential nature, unless specifically designated in writing as proprietary or confidential by Verra Mobility (“Verra Mobility Confidential Information”). If, however, Verra Mobility does designate certain information as proprietary or confidential, Customer shall treat the Verra Mobility Confidential Information with the same degree of care and same restrictions as Customer treats its own proprietary and confidential information, but in no event with less than reasonable care and reasonable restrictions. Customer will use Verra Mobility Confidential Information solely in connection with its rights and obligations under this Agreement, and will not use Verra Mobility Confidential Information for any other purpose, including but not limited to any use to harm or injure Verra Mobility or in any other way detrimental to Verra Mobility. If Customer receives a request or becomes legally obligated or compelled (by deposition, interrogatory, request for documents, subpoena, civil investigative demand, other demand or request by a governmental agency, or the application of statutes, rules or regulations) to disclose any of the Verra Mobility Confidential Information, Customer will promptly provide Verra Mobility with written notice of such request or requirement before any disclosure, and will cooperate with Verra Mobility’s reasonable efforts to obtain confidential treatment of the Verra Mobility Confidential Information. If a protective order or other confidential treatment is not obtained or if Verra Mobility waives its rights under this paragraph, Customer agrees to furnish only so much of the Verra Mobility Confidential Information as it is legally required to furnish and to exercise its best efforts to obtain written assurances that confidential treatment will be accorded to the Verra Mobility Confidential Information. Customer will give Verra Mobility an opportunity to review the Verra Mobility Confidential Information prior to its disclosure, and Customer will allow Verra Mobility to participate in any related proceeding. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed contrary to the terms and provisions of any public records laws, insofar as they may be applicable. 7. PROPRIETARY RIGHTS: 7.1 Back Office: Verra Mobility’s proprietary BOS is software-as-a-service. Under all circumstances, Verra Mobility shall retain ownership of the BOS, including any modifications, configurations, improvements, enhancements, upgrades, or further developments of the BOS, even if modified, configured, improved, enhanced, upgraded, or further developed at the request, feedback, or recommendation of the Customer. Under no circumstance will any modifications, configurations, improvements, enhancements, upgrades, or further developments of the BOS be considered “Work for Hire”. During the term of our Agreement with Customer, Verra Mobility grants Customer a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable license to access and use the BOS for the sole purpose of Customer performing its obligations under this Agreement. Page 207 of 269 7.2 Systems: Under all circumstances, Verra Mobility shall retain ownership of all Camera Systems. On and as of the date of termination of this Agreement, Customer shall be deemed to accept and receive full ownership and control of the Photo Enforcement Infrastructure. 7.3 Public Safety Campaign and Public Awareness: As between the parties, Verra Mobility owns and retains all rights, title and interest in and to the Public Safety Campaign Content, if any, created by Verra Mobility and all intellectual property rights therein, excluding all Customer Content. “Public Safety Campaign Content” means all content, trademarks, service marks, works of authorship, products, software, software code, databases, technology, information, data, specifications, documentation, algorithms, technical and business plans, and other materials of any kind, and all intellectual property rights therein produced by Verra Mobility for a Public Safety Campaign pursuant to EXHIBIT B. Verra Mobility grants to Customer a perpetual, revocable, non-transferable, and non-exclusive license to use, copy, display, and distribute the Public Safety Campaign Content solely to promote Customer’s photo enforcement programs, and to modify the Public Safety Campaign Content as needed for formatting for exercise of the license granted. 7.4 In order to produce the Public Safety Campaign Content, Customer grants Verra Mobility a nonexclusive, fully paid-up, license to use, reproduce, distribute, perform, practice and display, and to create derivatives of all content, trademarks, service marks, works of authorship, products, software, software code, databases, technology, information, data, specifications, documentation, algorithms, technical and business plans, and other materials of any kind, and all intellectual property rights therein provided to Verra Mobility (“Customer Content”) solely for Verra Mobility to (i) create the Public Safety Campaign Content, and (ii) provide services to Customer. Customer has the ability to approve use of any Customer Content in the Public Safety Campaign Content. In order to carry out the purposes of this Agreement, for the term of this Agreement, Verra Mobility grants Customer a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable license to use and display Verra Mobility information provided by Verra Mobility on or in marketing, public awareness or education, or other publications or materials relating to the Program, so long as any and all such publications or materials are approved by Verra Mobility in advance of use. 7.5 Data Use: Verra Mobility shall retain the ownership rights to all metadata, business intelligence, or other analytics obtained, gathered, or mined by Verra Mobility from the data captured by the Camera Systems and the BOS, [including through the Enhanced Video Services if applicable, as defined in EXHIBIT B]. Furthermore, Verra Mobility has a right to use non-personalized and aggregated Program data for its internal business purposes, analytics, statistical analysis, and to perform analyses which would further Customer’s Program. 7.6 Public Disclosure: Verra Mobility Corporation, the ultimate parent company in the corporate family, is a public company registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with shares of its common stock listed on the NASDAQ. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit Verra Mobility’s or Verra Mobility Corporation’s ability to comply with our disclosure obligations as interpreted by our attorneys and accountants under applicable, laws, rules, and regulations of the SEC or the NASDAQ. 8. INDEMNIFICATION AND LIABILITY: 8.1 Indemnification by Verra Mobility. Verra Mobility agrees to indemnify Customer and its managers, officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives and successors (individually, a “Customer Party” and collectively, the “Customer Parties”) against all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties and judgments (collectively, “Losses”), which may be imposed on or incurred by any Customer Party arising out of or related to the gross negligence of, willful misconduct of, or material breach of this Agreement by Verra Mobility, which results in death or bodily injury to any natural person (including third parties) or any damage to any real or tangible personal property (including the personal property of third parties), except to the extent caused by the gross negligence of, willful misconduct of, or material breach of this Agreement by any Customer Partyany claim, action or demand (a “Claim”) caused by Customer's failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement. Page 208 of 269 8.2 Indemnification by Customer. Customer hereby agrees to indemnify Verra Mobility and its affiliates, shareholders or other interest holders, managers, officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives and successors, permitted assignees and all Persons acting by, through, under or in concert with them (individually, an “Verra Mobility Party” and collectively, the “Verra Mobility Parties”) against all claims, losses, damages, suits and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, to the extent the claims arise out of, or result from, the performance of this Agreement by the Customer which results in death or bodily injury to any natural person (including third parties) or any damage to any real or tangible personal property (including the personal property of third parties), except (a) to the extent caused by the gross negligence of, willful misconduct of, or material breach of this Agreement by any Verra Mobility Party or (b) any Claim caused by Verra Mobility's failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement. 8.3 Indemnification Procedures. In the event of any Claim in respect of which any party hereto seeks indemnification from the other, the party seeking indemnification (the "Indemnified Party") shall give the party from whom indemnification is sought (the "Indemnifying Party") written notice of such Claim promptly after the Indemnified Party first becomes aware thereof; provided, however, that failure to give such notice shall not preclude indemnification with respect to such Claim except to the extent of any additional or increased Losses or other actual prejudice directly caused by such failure. The Indemnifying Party and the Indemnified Party shall cooperate in the defense or settlement of any Claim and no party shall have the right to enter into any settlement agreement that materially affects the other party's material rights or material interests without such party's prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. 8.4 Limited Liability. In no event shall Verra Mobility’s liability under this Agreement exceed the greater of $1,000,000 or the average of the prior twelve (12) months of Fees paid by Customer pursuant to this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, neither party shall be liable to the other, by reason of any representation or express or implied warranty, condition or other term or any duty at common or civil law, for any indirect, incidental, special, or consequential damages, or lost profits, lost fines, or lost data however caused and on any theory of liability, arising out of or relating to this Agreement. 9. INSURANCE: Verra Mobility shall maintain the following minimum scope and limits of insurance: 9.1 Commercial General Liability Insurance including coverage for bodily injury, property damage, premises and operations, products/completed operations, personal and advertising injury, and contractual liability with a combined single limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence. 9.2 Workers’ Compensation as required by applicable state law, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limits of not less than $500,000 each accident. Verra Mobility shall at all times maintain Worker’s Compensation insurance coverage in the amounts required by Law, but shall not be required to provide such coverage for any actual or statutory employee of Customer. 9.3 Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance for all owned, non-owned and hired automobiles and other vehicles used by Verra Mobility with a minimum $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit bodily injury and property damage. 9.4 Customer shall be named as additional insured on the comprehensive general liability policies provided by Verra Mobility under this Agreement. 9.5 Certificates showing Verra Mobility is carrying the above-described insurance shall be furnished to Customer within thirty (30) calendar days after Customer request. Customer shall maintain the following minimum scope and limits of insurance: Page 209 of 269 9.6 Commercial General Liability insurance including coverage for bodily injury, property damage, premises and operations, products/completed operations, personal and advertising injury, and contractual liability. 9.7 Worker’s Compensation coverage as required by applicable state law and Employer’s Liability Insurance. 9.8 Business Automobile Liability Insurance coverage for automobiles and all installed equipment, on any automobiles driven by Customer employees or contractors, including the Mobile Speed Safety Camera Systems. Coverage will include liability and collision damage and shall provide 100% coverage. 9.9 Customer will provide certificates of insurance, listing Verra Mobility as an additional insured on Business Automobile Liability Insurance. If self-insured, the Customer will maintain coverages sufficient to cover any liability specified above that may arise from the performance of this Agreement and show evidence of such. If Customer fails to meet the above insurance requirements, Verra Mobility reserves the right to procure such insurance and bill the Customer. 10. LIMITED WARRANTY: EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT VERRA MOBILITY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE CAMERA SYSTEMS, THE BOS, OR ANY RELATED EQUIPMENT OR SOFTWARE, OR WITH RESPECT TO THE RESULTS OF THE PROGRAM. THE CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT AT TIMES SUCH SYSTEMS AND RELATED EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE MAY MALFUNCTION OR OTHERWISE NOT OPERATE AS ANTICIPATED. VERRA MOBILITY SHALL DILIGENTLY ENDEAVOR TO CORRECT ANY SUCH MALFUNCTION IN A TIMELY MANNER. 11. STATE LAW TO APPLY: This Agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. 12. DISPUTE RESOLUTION: 12.1 All disputes arising out of or in connection with the Agreement shall be attempted to be settled through good-faith efforts between senior management of both parties. Following thirty (30) days of unsuccessful negotiation, the parties shall participate in professionally-assisted mediation, with a mediator acceptable to both parties. The parties agree to discuss their differences in good faith and to attempt, with the assistance of the mediator, to reach an amicable resolution of the dispute. The mediation will be treated as a settlement discussion and therefore will be confidential. The mediator may not testify for either party in any later proceeding relating to the dispute. No recording or transcript shall be made of the mediation proceedings. Each party will bear its own costs in the mediation. The fees and expenses of the mediator will be shared equally by the parties. 12.2 Failing resolution through negotiation or mediation, any remaining dispute shall be submitted to binding arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration Rules for Professional Accounting and Related Services Disputes of the American Arbitration Association (“AAA Rules”) before a single arbitrator. The place of arbitration will be mutually agreed upon within fourteen (14) days of a decision to seek arbitration. Limited discovery will be permitted in connection with the arbitration upon agreement of the parties and upon a showing of substantial need by the party seeking discovery. 12.3 The arbitrator’s decision shall follow the plain and natural meaning of the relevant documents and shall be final and binding. The arbitrator will have no power to award: a) damages inconsistent with the Agreement; or, Page 210 of 269 b) punitive damages or any other damages not measured by the prevailing party’s actual damages, and the parties expressly waive their right to obtain such damages in arbitration or in any other forum. 12.4 All aspects of the arbitration will be confidential. Neither the parties nor the arbitrator may disclose the existence, content or results of the arbitration, except as may be necessary to comply with legal or regulatory requirements. 12.5 Each party will promptly pay its share of all arbitration fees and costs, provided that such fees and costs shall be recoverable by the prevailing party as determined by the arbitrator. If a party fails to pay such share promptly upon demand, the arbitrator shall, upon written request by the other party, enter a final and binding decision against the nonpaying party for the full amount of such share, together with an award of attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by the other party in obtaining such decision, which decision may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. Except for the failure of a party to pay arbitration fees and costs that requires the arbitrator to order such payment, the parties will bear their own attorneys’ fees in any matter or dispute under this Agreement. 13. CHANGE ORDERS: Customer may request the addition of any products or services that Verra Mobility provides or other changes to the scope of work to be performed under this Agreement by providing a Change Order Notice to Verra Mobility. Upon Verra Mobility’s receipt of the Change Order Notice, Verra Mobility shall deliver to Customer a Change Order Proposal. Following Customer’s receipt of the Change Order Proposal, the parties shall negotiate in good faith regarding a plan and schedule for implementation of the proposed changes; the time, manner and amount of payment or price and any other matters relating to the proposed changes. Any Change Order Proposal mutually agreed to by the parties in writing shall be incorporated as an addendum to this Agreement. Pursuant to General Provisions, Article 21 (Change Orders and Amendments). Any failure of the parties to reach agreement with respect to any foregoing as a result of any proposed changes will not be deemed to be a breach of this Agreement. 14. TERMINATION: 14.1 Verra Mobility’s services may be terminated: (i) By mutual written consent of the parties; or (ii) For material breach of this Agreement by either party, where the other party fails in any material way to perform its obligations under this Agreement. a) Where Customer is in breach of this Agreement for non-payment of Fees to Verra Mobility, Verra Mobility may exercise any or all of the following remedies: (1) provide Customer written notice and ten (10) days to cure before suspending performance and turning off the Camera Systems; (2) terminate this Agreement for cause where Customer’s account remains delinquent sixty (60) days after written notice; and (3) in addition to the foregoing, seek any other available remedies at law or equity. b) Termination under this Subsection 14.1(ii) for any reason other than non-payment of Fees by Customer is subject to the condition that the terminating party notifies the other party of its intent to terminate, stating with reasonable specificity the grounds therefore, and the other party fails to cure the default within forty-five (45) days after receiving written notice. (iii) In the event of termination of this Agreement prior to the end of its term for any reason, except material breach by Verra Mobility, Customer shall pay Verra Mobility an early termination fee based on an amount of $90,000 per Red Light Safety Camera System, $90,000 per Fixed Speed Safety Camera System, $45,000 per Transportable Speed Safety Camera System and $115,000 per Mobile Speed Safety Camera System amortized over sixty (60) months on a straight-line basis. Page 211 of 269 (iv) Customer recognizes the substantial upfront costs Verra Mobility will incur to procure, provide and install Camera Systems. Customer therefore agrees that any Camera Systems that Customer authorizes through a Notice to Proceed shall remain installed and operational for the duration of the term, unless otherwise mutually agreed. Verra Mobility will bill a restocking or standby fee for any upfront costs associated with the Camera System(s), vehicle(s), or other equipment in the event Customer terminates or suspends a Notice to Proceed. 14.2 Upon termination of this Agreement, including because it has reached the end of its term, the parties recognize that Customer will have to process Events in the “pipeline”. Accordingly, the parties shall take the following actions and shall have the following obligations, which survive termination during the wind-down period: (i) Customer shall cease using the Camera Systems to capture Events. (ii) Unless it is unlawful to do so, Verra Mobility will, for a period of ninety (90) days, continue to process all Events captured before termination and provide all services associated with processing in accordance with this Agreement and shall be entitled to a monthly Fee per Camera System. After such ninety (90) day period, Verra Mobility will terminate all use of the BOS for Customer’s Program and upon such termination, the BOS, including Verra Mobility provided website accessible by Owners/violators, and related lockbox shall no longer be capable of accepting payments. (iii) Except as provided for in Section 14.2(iv) related to the Photo Enforcement Infrastructure, Customer shall return or allow Verra Mobility to recover all provided equipment within a reasonable time not to exceed ninety (90) days. (iv) Pursuant to Section 7, Customer shall be deemed to accept full ownership and control of the Photo Enforcement Infrastructure. Upon Customer’s request or if otherwise required by Law, regulation, or administrative agency, and subject to the limitations set forth herein, Verra Mobility shall remove the Photo Enforcement Infrastructure Verra Mobility installed in connection with Verra Mobility’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement for the actual cost of the removal (presently estimated at approximately $5,000 per Approach) plus an additional 20% service fee (the “Removal Fee”). As part of the services performed for the Removal Fee, Verra Mobility shall restore the surface of Customer’s property to substantially the same condition as such property was in immediately prior to this Agreement, except for foundation removal, which shall be left approximately flush with grade with no exposed bolts, or other hazards. Installed underground Photo Enforcement Infrastructure shall not be required to be removed, and Customer shall accept and observe any and all duties, obligations, or liabilities associated with the remaining foundation, conduit, or other below-grade Photo Enforcement Infrastructure. 14.3 In the event of termination by Verra Mobility for non-payment of Fees by Customer, Verra Mobility shall cease processing Events as of the date of termination. 15. LIMITED AGENCY: Customer hereby grants Verra Mobility the authority to act on its behalf as a limited agent of Customer, and shall cause the applicable law enforcement agency to grant Verra Mobility the authority to act as a limited agent of the law enforcement agency, for the purposes of (i) facilitating establishment of bank accounts and delivering payment/transfer instructions, if applicable; (ii) access to DMV records; and (iii) generating and administratively processing recorded images of Events as described in this Agreement and the Business Rules. Verra Mobility and its employees, contractors, agents and servants will in no event be considered to be employees, agents (other than in the limited capacity described herein), or servants of Customer. This Agreement does not and shall not be interpreted as creating a general agency relationship between Verra Mobility and Customer. Page 212 of 269 16. USE OF SUBCONTRACTORS: From time to time, Verra Mobility may subcontract certain services provided under this Agreement without notice to or consent of Customer. 17. DATA RETENTION: Subject to litigation holds, court orders, changes in Law, or other legal requirements applicable to Verra Mobility, Verra Mobility shall maintain the categories of data set forth under the heading “Type of Record” for the periods of time set forth under the heading “Minimum Verra Mobility Retention Period” on EXHIBIT E during the term of this Agreement. Customer represents and warrants to Verra Mobility that the data retention schedule provided by Customer complies with the laws applicable to Customer. Within one hundred-twenty (120) days of the later of the termination of this Agreement or the termination of any wind-down period, or the transition from the Legacy BOS to the New BOS pursuant to Exhibit A, Verra Mobility shall at its option either (i) place the Violation Images, Non-Violation Images, Individually Identifiable Violation Records, and Individually Identifiable Non-Violation Records (each as described on EXHIBIT E), not previously disposed of in accordance with the data retention schedule at a secured location with SFTP access or (ii) provide Customer with a hard-drive containing the Violation Images, Non- Violation Images, Individually Identifiable Violation Records, and Individually Identifiable Non-Violation Records, where Customer shall have ninety (90) days to retrieve and validate the information. After ninety (90) days, Verra Mobility shall delete all data from the SFTP location (if applicable) and shall have no further data retention obligations to Customer with respect to such data. Customer acknowledges that DMV data source providers may require Customer to enter into licensing agreements with the DMV data source providers in order for Customer to have continued access to certain registered owner information after the termination of this Agreement. 18. ASSIGNMENT: Neither party may assign all or any portion of this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. However, for business financing purposes or other corporate reorganizational purposes, Verra Mobility may sell, assign, transfer or convey any interest in this Agreement in whole or in part without the written consent of Customer. 19. FORCE MAJEURE: Neither party will be liable to the other or be deemed to be in breach of this Agreement for any failure or delay in rendering performance arising out of causes beyond its reasonable control and without its fault or negligence. Such causes may include but are not limited to, acts of God or the public enemy, terrorism, significant fires, floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, epidemics, pandemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes, unusually severe weather, supply-chain disruptions or governmental authorities approval delays which are not caused by any act or omission by the parties. The party whose performance is affected agrees to notify the other promptly of the existence and nature of any delay. For the avoidance of doubt, road construction is not an event of Force Majeure on behalf of the Customer. The term of the Agreement shall be extended by a period equal to that during which either party’s performance is suspended under this section. 20. NOTICES: Any notices or demand which, under the terms of this Agreement or under any statute, that must or may be given or made by Verra Mobility or Customer shall be in writing and shall be given or made by personal service, overnight delivery service (e.g. Federal Express), or by certified mail to the parties at the following addresses: American Traffic Solutions, Inc. 1150 North Alma School Road Mesa, Arizona 85201 Attn: Government Solutions Legal Department Page 213 of 269 21. LEGAL CONSTRUCTION: In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had not been contained herein. This Agreement shall be enforced to the maximum extent possible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties and shall be reformed without further action by the parties to the extent necessary to make such provision valid and enforceable herein. 22. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT: Any changes, modifications or amendments to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. 23. INTEGRATION: This Agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement of the parties and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous understanding, written or oral, between the parties respecting its subject matter. 24. SURVIVAL: The following provisions of the General Terms and Conditions shall survive the termination of this Agreement: Sections 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, 20, 22, 25 and this Section 24. 25. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: During the term of this Agreement, from time-to-time Verra Mobility may propose certain new technologies for Customer to consider and, if so desired, Customer may procure from Verra Mobility the new technologies through an amendment to this Agreement upon terms to be mutually agreed upon by the parties. 26. PILOTS: From time to time, at the mutual agreement of the parties, Verra Mobility may pilot existing Verra Mobility products and services or products and services that are under development by Verra Mobility or its current or future subcontractors and vendors (each a “Vendor”). During any pilot pursuant to this Section 26, registered owner information shall not be used and no Events will be issued as Citations and no mailing of warnings or Citations will occur. Customer expressly acknowledges that Verra Mobility is under no obligation to retain for any period of time any data produced by any pilot systems. Verra Mobility may request Customer or its employees to provide feedback on the use, quality, viability, features, functionality, or desirability of pilot systems (“Customer Feedback”). All data, drawings, plans, specifications, blueprints, studies, reports, memoranda, computation sheets, computer files and media or other documents prepared or generated by Verra Mobility or a Vendor or a pilot system in connection with any pilot shall remain the property of Verra Mobility (the “Pilot Data”). To the extent that such Pilot Data is provided to Customer, Verra Mobility grants to Customer a limited, personal, non sublicensable, nonexclusive license to use the Pilot Data, solely for evaluation and statistical purposes. Actual program performance may vary from pilot performance. Customer acknowledges and agrees that the terms of this Agreement, except for Sections 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 19, 20, 21 and this Section 26, shall not apply to any such pilot. 27. EXECUTION: This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement, and all of which, when taken together, shall be deemed to constitute one and the same Agreement. The exchange of copies of this Agreement and of signature pages by facsimile or “.pdf” transmission shall constitute effective execution and delivery of this Agreement as to the parties and may be Page 214 of 269 used in lieu of the original Agreement for all purposes. Signatures of the parties transmitted by facsimile or “.pdf” shall be deemed to be their original signatures for any purpose whatsoever. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Page 215 of 269 EXHIBIT A SERVICE FEE SCHEDULE 1.0 Description of Pricing Fees are based on per camera and are as follows: Product Description Fee* Red Light Safety Camera System – the parties shall mutually agree on the number of Camera Systems to be installed. $5,113.50 Fixed Fee per Month per Camera System Subsequent Notices Mailing Fee – For any additional notices sent by first class mail required by the Customer or required by Law in excess of the standard set of notices as described in Subsection 1.2.3 of EXHIBIT B, Verra Mobility will charge the Customer a Subsequent Notices Mailing Fee. $2.00 per page per notice Video Retrieval Fee: Verra Mobility shall retrieve up to one (1) video per week at no cost to Customer. For all additional video retrievals, the fee is $10.00 each. Service Fees: All service Fees per Camera System above includes all costs required and associated with a Camera System installation, routine maintenance, use of BOS for back-office operations and reporting, Event processing services, DMV records access, the standard set of notices as described in Subsection 1.2.3 of EXHIBIT B, lockbox and epayment processing (excluding user convenience fee, which is paid by payor and excluding any bank account set up or monthly bank account fees), IVR call center support for general Program questions and public awareness Program support. Any required certified mail, or other special mailing, is not included and the fee is extra and will be billed per unit as published by the US Postal Service. Verra Mobility’s monthly fee includes postage for the standard set of notices as described in Subsection 1.2.3 of EXHIBIT B. Certified mail or other mailings is extra and will be billed per unit as published by the US Postal Service plus a $2.00 per unit per page service charge. Verra Mobility’s Fee anticipate a standard Washington BOS configuration and a standard suite of notices as described in Subsection 1.2.3 of EXHIBIT B. For configuration or Program customization work in excess of the standard Washington BOS, Verra Mobility shall provide Customer with an hours estimate and, upon approval by Customer for the work, shall invoice Customer $200 per hour for such additional configuration or Program customization. Customer and Verra Mobility recognize the Legacy BOS provided, or to be provided, by Verra Mobility to Customer may need to be changed during the term of the Agreement, at Verra Mobility’s sole-discretion, due to end-of-life technology, and if such change is necessary Verra Mobility shall provide the New BOS to Customer at no additional charge, unless additional configurations or Program customization are requested by Customer then the fee for additional configuration or Program customization will apply. Customer access to Data and Verra Mobility's obligations under this EXHIBIT A shall be in accordance with Article 17 of this Agreement. 2.0 Optional Collection Services: In the event that Customer elects to have Verra Mobility engage a collections agency to perform collections services, Verra Mobility’s designated collection’s subcontractor may initiate collection efforts of delinquent notices upon written request by Customer, so long as collection of said recovered revenue amounts does not conflict with applicable state law. Verra Mobility will be entitled to receive portions of the collected revenue as noted below. For those accounts in default that go to collection, this is in addition to Verra Mobility Fees noted in Section 1.0 above. Page 216 of 269 Delinquent Collections Services 30% of Recovered Revenue In the event that Customer elects to have Verra Mobility provide collections services, Customer shall so notify Verra Mobility in writing. Customer agrees that, once Verra Mobility’s collections services are elected, Customer may not utilize another vendor for these collections services without prior written consent from Verra Mobility through an amendment to this Agreement. Page 217 of 269 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK 1. VERRA MOBILITY SCOPE OF WORK 1.1 VERRA MOBILITY IMPLEMENTATION 1.1.1 Verra Mobility agrees to provide Camera System(s), use of the BOS and related services to Customer as outlined in this Agreement, excluding those items identified in Section 2 titled “Customer Scope of Work”. Verra Mobility and Customer understand and agree that new or previously unforeseen requirements may, from time to time, be identified and that the parties shall negotiate in good faith to assign the proper party the responsibility and cost for such items. In general, if work is to be performed by Customer, unless otherwise specified, Customer shall not charge Verra Mobility for the cost. 1.1.2 Customer and Verra Mobility will complete the Project Time Line within sixty (60) days of Agreement execution date, unless mutually agreed to otherwise by the parties. Verra Mobility agrees to make every effort to adhere to the Project Time Line. 1.1.3 Verra Mobility will install or deploy Camera System(s) at a number of Designated Safety Zones to be mutually agreed upon between Verra Mobility and Customer as reflected in a written Notice to Proceed. In addition to any initial Designated Safety Zones the parties may mutually agree to add additional Camera System(s) or Approaches, which shall also be reflected in a written Notice to Proceed as set forth in EXHIBIT C. 1.1.4 Site installation plans for fixed-site installations shall be prepared under the supervision of, approved and sealed by a licensed professional engineer licensed to perform engineering services in the state where the Camera Systems will be installed. 1.1.5 Verra Mobility shall not be responsible for, nor shall it perform, any engineering or traffic safety studies as may be desired by Customer or required by laws applicable to Customer. 1.1.6 Verra Mobility will operate each Camera System on a 24-hour basis, barring downtime for maintenance, normal servicing activities, or other unforeseen instances, unless enforcement times are restricted by law, such as in school zones. 1.1.7 Verra Mobility’s Marketing Department will assist Customer with public information content and outreach campaign strategies (“Public Safety Campaign”). 1.1.8 Verra Mobility agrees to provide a secure website accessible to Owners/violators who have received notices of violation by means of a Notice # and PIN, which will allow Violation image and video viewing. Verra Mobility shall include a link to the payment website(s) and may offer the opportunity to download an affidavit of non-liability online. Verra Mobility will operate this secure website on a 24-hour basis, barring downtime for maintenance, normal servicing activities, or other unforeseen instances. 1.1.9 Verra Mobility will provide technician site visits to each Camera System, as needed, to perform maintenance checks consisting of camera enclosure lens cleaning; camera, strobe and controller enclosure cleaning; inspection of exposed wires; and, general system inspections and maintenance. 1.1.10 Verra Mobility shall take commercially reasonable best efforts to repair a non-functional System within seventy-two (72) hours (excluding weekends and holidays) of determination of a malfunction. Page 218 of 269 1.1.11 If Customer is using Verra Mobility enabled lockbox or epayment services, Customer shall provide Verra Mobility and the applicable payment processor with the items set forth in Section 2.1.4 below. 1.2 VERRA MOBILITY OPERATIONS 1.2.1 Verra Mobility shall implement and operate the Program in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and the Customer’s Business Rules. 1.2.2 If a warning period is required, Verra Mobility shall provide Customer with a one-time warning period up to thirty (30) days in length following the installation and activation of the first installed Camera System. Customer shall not be charged a fee for the warning period; however for any warning period exceeding thirty (30) days, Customer shall be responsible for the normal monthly Fee. 1.2.3 Verra Mobility shall provide Customer with access to the BOS, including image processing, and printing and mailing of up to six (6) letters/ notices in support of Citation issuance and escalation. In the case of a transfer of liability by the Owner, the BOS shall be setup to mail a Citation to the driver identified in the affidavit of non-liability or identified by a rental car company. Costs of certified mailings are priced separately and paid by Customer to Verra Mobility as indicated in EXHIBIT A. 1.2.4 Subsequent notices, other than those specified in Subsection 1.2.3 may be delivered by first class or other mail means for additional compensation to Verra Mobility as agreed upon by the parties. 1.2.5 Verra Mobility shall apply an electronic signature, name, or badge number to the Citation as authorized in the Customer’s Business Rules. 1.2.6 Verra Mobility may make non-substantive formatting or incidental changes to the Citation form without approval by Customer. 1.2.7 Verra Mobility shall seek records from vehicle registration databases reasonably accessible to Verra Mobility through its limited agent relationship with Customer and use such records to assist Customer in processing Citations. Verra Mobility reserves the right to pass-through to Customer any cost increases imposed on Verra Mobility by DMV data sources. 1.2.8 The BOS shall provide Customer with the ability to run and print standard system reports. Verra Mobility provides a suite of standard program reporting at no charge to clients with active Programs. Upon notice to Customer, Verra Mobility reserves the right to modify the suite of standard program reporting available to Customer, so long as such change applies generally to customers with similar programs. Customized reporting services are available upon written request. The fee for such services shall be mutually agreed upon. 1.2.9 During the twelve (12) month period following the installation or deployment of the first Camera System, upon Verra Mobility’s receipt of a written request from Customer at least fourteen (14) calendar days in advance of a court proceeding, and if required by the court or prosecutor, Verra Mobility shall provide Customer with or train a Customer provided local expert witness to testify in court on matters relating to the accuracy, technical operations, and effectiveness of the Camera System or the BOS until judicial notice is taken. Customer shall use its best efforts to obtain judicial notice as soon as possible. If a Verra Mobility expert witness is required more than two (2) times during the twelve (12) month period, Customer shall reimburse Verra Mobility for any reasonable time and travel costs incurred for the additional dates. Page 219 of 269 1.2.10 In those instances where damage to a System (or sensors where applicable) is caused by (i) negligence on the part of Verra Mobility or its authorized agent(s), Verra Mobility shall bear the cost of repair or (ii) negligence or recklessness on the part of a driver or severe weather or other Force Majeure events, Verra Mobility and Customer shall bear the cost of repair equally with Customer reimbursing Verra Mobility for its portion of the cost of repair. For all other causes of damage, including road construction, Customer negligence, etc. Customer shall reimburse Verra Mobility for the cost of repair. 1.2.11 Verra Mobility shall provide a help-line to assist Customer with resolving any problems encountered regarding its Camera System and/or the BOS. The help-line shall function during Business Hours. 2. CUSTOMER SCOPE OF WORK 2.1 GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS 2.1.1 Within seven (7) business days of the Effective Date of this Agreement, Customer shall provide Verra Mobility with the name, title, mailing address, email address and phone number of all Customer stakeholders, including: o A project manager with authority to coordinate Customer responsibilities under this Agreement; o Court manager responsible for oversight of all Court-related program requirements; o The police contact; o The court contact; o The person responsible for overseeing payments by violators (might be court); o The prosecuting attorney; o The Customer attorney; o The finance contact (who receives the invoices and will be in charge of reconciliation); o The IT person for the police; o The IT person for the courts; o The public works and/or engineering contact responsible for issuing any/all permits for construction; and o Court manager responsible for oversight of all Court-related program requirements. 2.1.2 Customer and Verra Mobility shall complete the Project Time Line within sixty (60) calendar days of the Effective Date of this Agreement, unless mutually agreed to otherwise by the parties. Customer shall make every effort to adhere to the Project Time Line. 2.1.3 As requested from time to time by Customer, Verra Mobility will provide Customer with a mock-up of the Citation and other notices within fifteen (15) days of a completed Business Rules Questionnaire. Customer shall review the Citation and other notices to ensure conformity with the Laws applicable to Customer. Except as outlined in Section 1.2.6, Verra Mobility shall not implement changes to the Citation or other notices without Customer’s prior review and sign-off. Customer is responsible for the content of its Program notices, including but not limited to Citations. 2.1.4 Customer intends to utilize Verra Mobility enabled payment processing channels. Customer shall designate a Customer account for deposit / settlement of funds paid by payors. Within seven (7) business days of receipt by Customer, Customer shall provide Verra Mobility completed banking forms and payment processing agreements, which may include among others a Participant Agreement and Submerchant Agreement with the payment processor as well as a bank verification letter prepared by the Customer’s settlement account’s bank, and a Form W-9, Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification. A copy of the Page 220 of 269 Participant Agreement and the Submerchant Agreement are each attached here to as EXHIBIT F. 2.1.5 Customer shall direct the law enforcement agency to execute the Verra Mobility DMV Services Subscriber Authorization (substantially in the form attached as EXHIBIT D) to provide verification to the National Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (NLETS) indicating that Verra Mobility is acting on behalf of the Customer for the purposes of accessing vehicle ownership data pursuant to the list of permissible uses delineated in the Drivers Privacy Protection Act 18 U.S.C. 2721, Section (b)(1). Access to registered owner information through National Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (NLETS) requires Customer to provide Verra Mobility with a unique Customer ORI. In order to access certain state departments of motor vehicles records directly (not through NLETS), agreements or applications directly between customer and the state DMV may be required by Customer, including agreements requiring Customer to comply with certain permissible use, privacy, and security requirements of the applicable state department of motor vehicle. If required, Customer shall execute such agreements or applications with, participate in audits by, or provide certifications to state department of motor vehicles. If Customer requires Verra Mobility to access registered owner information from sources other than NLETS or direct through a state DMV, accessible to Verra Mobility at no cost, additional fees will apply. 2.1.6 Customer shall prepare, execute, update, and maintain the Business Rules for implementation and operation of the Program. Customer’s failure to timely prepare the Business Rules may impact the Project Time Line or compliance of Customer’s Program with applicable laws. Verra Mobility shall not be liable for Customer’s failure to update and maintain the Business Rules. To the extent that there is a conflict between the Business Rules and Agreement, the Agreement shall govern. 2.1.7 Customer is responsible for notifying Verra Mobility of any local legislative and/or ordinance changes in writing within forty-eight (48) hours of the first read of the proposed legislation. Verra Mobility will not be responsible for complying with any change in applicable local law, until such time as Verra Mobility has been notified by Customer in writing of the change in Law and, if applicable, Customer’s Business Rules have been updated by Customer. In the event of a change in Law, excluding a change in Customer’s local law, which would increase the cost of Verra Mobility’s provision of the Services, Verra Mobility may propose a Fee increase to Customer. If the parties cannot mutually agree on the Fee change, Verra Mobility may terminate this Agreement. In the event of a change in or adoption of a local law of Customer, which would increase the cost of Verra Mobility’s provision of the Services, Verra Mobility shall provide Customer with a Fee increase consistent with Verra Mobility’s increased operating cost, and Customer shall be obligated to pay such increased Fees. 2.1.8 Customer is responsible for all final jurisdictional issues, including but not limited to as they pertain to issuance of Citations, adjudication of Violations, and intergovernmental authorities. 2.1.9 Once a Notice to Proceed is granted to Verra Mobility in writing, Customer shall not issue a stop work order to suspend activity on the implementation process, unless Customer reimburses Verra Mobility for costs incurred up to the date the stop work order is issued. 2.1.10 Customer will comply with all applicable Laws relating to its conduct with respect to the Program. Customer shall not use the Camera Systems, the BOS, or the data captured by the Camera Systems or provided by NLETs or DMV data source providers for any purpose not permitted by Law. 2.1.11 Once a Camera System is installed and certified by Verra Mobility as operational, it shall be immediately put into service at the next available enforcement period or as otherwise mutually agreed to by the Parties. Page 221 of 269 2.1.12 Customer shall process each Event in accordance with state law and/or municipality ordinances within three (3) business days of its appearance in the law enforcement review queue, using the BOS to determine which Events constitute Violations that will be issued as Citations. In the event that Customer fails to process Events within this timeframe, Verra Mobility shall not be liable for failure of the BOS to allow Customer to issue a notice or Citation within statutory timeframes. 2.1.13 In the event that remote access to the BOS is blocked by Customer network security infrastructure, Customer’s Department of Information Technology shall coordinate with Verra Mobility to facilitate appropriate communications while maintaining required security measures. 2.1.14 Customer shall be responsible for any reporting obligations that it has to any state or other regulatory body with respect to its operation of the Program or the payment of Citations. 2.2 STREETS AND TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 2.2.1 All Fixed Camera Systems are intended to remain installed for the duration of the Agreement. If Customer requests that Verra Mobility move a Fixed Camera System after initial installation, Customer shall pay for the total cost to relocate the System. 2.2.2 If a construction or improvement project requires an installed Camera System to be deactivated or requires a Camera System, including imbedded sensors, to be moved or removed, Customer shall pay a reduced monthly fee of $2,500 per month for the deactivated Camera System during the time the Camera System is deactivated and pay any costs incurred by Verra Mobility for removing, and if applicable reinstalling, the System. If the System shall be reinstalled after project is completed, in lieu of paying the reduced monthly Fee while Camera System is deactivated Customer may instead elect through a Change Order, or other written modification to the Agreement, to extend the current term of the Agreement for the time period the Camera System was deactivated. 2.2.3 Prior to the installation of any System, Customer shall provide Verra Mobility information regarding any and all road construction or improvement projects scheduled during the term of this Agreement for any Approach designated for System installation. In addition, within thirty (30) days of becoming aware of anticipated construction that may result in the deactivation or removal of a System or otherwise impact an Approach during the term of this Agreement, Customer shall notify Verra Mobility of any such construction. 2.2.4 Customer will design, fabricate, install and maintain camera warning signs required by Law for purposes of operating the Program. If Customer cannot provide such signage, Verra Mobility will do so, and Customer shall reimburse Verra Mobility for such costs. Even if Verra Mobility provides such signage, Customer shall remain responsible for maintaining such signage in compliance with applicable Laws. Customer is responsible for determining the placement/location of signs in compliance with applicable Laws. 2.2.5 Customer understands that proper operation of the Red Light Camera Systems requires access to traffic signal phase connections. Customer, therefore, shall provide access to traffic signal phase connections according to approved design. When traffic signal phase connections are not under the jurisdiction of Customer, it shall be Customer’s responsibility to negotiate agreements with the owner or maintaining agency of the traffic signal controller and infrastructure in order to provide the required access to said phase connections and infrastructure and any costs associated with needed agreements shall be funded by Customer. 2.2.6 Customer understands that proper operation of the Red Light Camera System sometimes requires attachment of certain items of detection equipment to existing signal masts, mast arms Page 222 of 269 and/or other street furniture. Customer, therefore, shall provide access to Verra Mobility to Page 223 of 269 attach certain items of detection equipment to existing signal masts, mast arms and / or other street furniture if required for the proper operation of the System. 2.2.7 Customer shall allow Verra Mobility to access power from existing power sources at no cost and, if applicable, shall allow or facilitate access to traffic signal phase connections to a pull box, pole base, or controller cabinet nearest to each System within Customer’s jurisdiction. If these items are not made available, the costs of any additional conduit or power infrastructure needed to support installation of the Camera System shall be funded by Customer. Verra Mobility may agree to cover these upfront costs and separately bill Customer through the monthly invoice over a period not to exceed one year. If existing power sources are not immediately available, Customer will allow Verra Mobility to use temporary power until the existing power is established. In situations where it is not possible to obtain electrical power from a pre-existing source, Customer shall bear the costs (or reimburse Verra Mobility) for obtaining/routing power. When access to power facilities is not under the jurisdiction of Customer, it shall be Customer’s responsibility to negotiate any necessary agreements with the owner or maintaining agency of the power facility and infrastructure in order to provide required access to said power facilities and infrastructure. Any costs associated with the needed agreements shall be funded by Customer. 2.2.8 Customer shall approve or reject site plans submitted Verra Mobility within seven (7) business days of receipt. Customer shall use best efforts to ensure that the total duration between submittal and finalization does not exceed ten (10) days for plan approvals when plans are being reviewed and permitted by any state, county, and/or local agencies. 2.2.9 Customer, or any department of Customer, shall not charge Verra Mobility or its subcontractor(s) for building, construction, electrical, street use and/or pole attachment permits, including any fee for traffic control services and permits during installation or maintenance of a System. Customer shall also apply for, when in Customer’s name, or coordinate the application for, when in the name of a Customer agency, school, or school district, and fund any and all needed state, local, and/or county permits, including any traffic control permits. 2.2.10 Customer shall issue all needed permits to Verra Mobility and its subcontractor(s) within three (3) business days of plan approval. Customer shall provide its best efforts to aid in achieving these timeframes for permit issuance when permitted by any state, local, and/or county agency. 2.2.11 If required by the submitted design plan for proper operation, Customer shall allow Verra Mobility to install vehicle detection sensors in the pavement of roadways within Customer’s jurisdiction. Customer shall provide its best efforts to aid in acquiring any and all required permission and permits when the roadway is under the jurisdiction of the state or county. 2.2.12 Customer shall allow Verra Mobility to build Infrastructure into any existing Customer-owned easement. 2.2.13 If use of private property right-of-way is needed, Customer shall assist Verra Mobility in acquiring permission to build in existing utility easements as necessary. Any costs for private property right-of-way lease/rental costs shall be borne by Customer as it is expressly excluded from the base fee structure identified in the fee schedule. 2.2.14 Customer shall be responsible for the performance of any engineering or traffic safety studies as may be desired by Customer or required by laws applicable to Customer. 2.3 COURTS OPERATIONS Page 224 of 269 2.3.1 Customer is responsible for the prosecution and adjudication of Citations in accordance with all applicable Laws. 2.3.2 Customer shall provide a judge or hearing officer and court facilities to schedule and hear disputed Citations. 2.3.3 Customer shall handle inbound and outbound phone calls and correspondence from defendants who have questions about disputes and other issues relating to Citation adjudication. 2.3.4 Verra Mobility shall provide Customer with access to its online BOS adjudication processing module which will enable the adjudication function to review cases, related images, and other related information required to adjudicate disputed Citations. If instead of using the online adjudication processing module in the BOS, Customer desires to integrate Verra Mobility data into its adjudication system, subject to feasibility, Verra Mobility shall provide a court interface. Verra Mobility shall provide a price proposal to Customer for the development of any such court interface. 2.3.5 Customer is responsible for entering all final dispositions of Citations including all payments of Citations into the BOS, either directly through the online adjudication processing module or through the court interface. Page 225 of 269 EXHIBIT C FORM OF NOTICE TO PROCEED Reference is made to the Professional Services Agreement by and between American Traffic Solutions, Inc., doing business as Verra Mobility (“Verra Mobility”) and City of Pasco, Washinton, a municipal corporation (“Customer”), dated as of [date] (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used in this Notice to Proceed shall have the meaning given to such term in the Agreement. Customer hereby designates this implementation of Systems at the Approaches listed below. Verra Mobility shall make its best efforts to install a System within sixty (60) days of permits being granted and power delivered for each agreed-upon Approach, providing that Customer has received permission for all implementations in writing from any third-party sources. Below is a list of Approaches provided by Customer, which have been analyzed based on traffic volumes, road geometry, and existing infrastructure and are believed to be locations at which a System would increase public safety. Execution of this Notice to Proceed by Customer shall serve as authorization for the installation of Systems for all Approaches designated as follows: Approach (Direction and Roadway) Type of Enforcement Camera System Solution (# of Cameras per Approach) Customer understands that implementation and installation of any Approach is subject to Site Selection Analysis and engineering results. Customer recognizes the substantial upfront costs Verra Mobility will incur to construct and install the Systems for the above listed Approaches. Customer agrees that the Systems authorized by this Notice to Proceed for the above-listed Approaches shall remain installed and operational for the duration of the current term of the Agreement. Verra Mobility reserves the right to bill Customer for any upfront costs associated with the Approaches listed above in the event Customer elects to cancel or suspend the installation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Customer has executed this Notice to Proceed as of the date written below. CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON By: Name: Title: Date ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO BY: AMERICAN TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS, INC. By: Name: Title: Date Page 226 of 269 EXHIBIT D DMV SERVICES SUBSCRIBER AUTHORIZATION February 20, 2024 Frank L. Minice, Executive Director/CEO National Law Enforcement Telecommunications System, Inc. (NLETS) 1918 W. Whispering Wind Drive Phoenix, AZ 85085 Dear Mr. Minice: Re: Authorization for ORI Code: The authorizes to use the ORI for the limited purpose of obtaining vehicle registration through Nlets. This letter acknowledgements that a contract to perform automated enforcement between and American Traffic Solutions, Inc., doing business as Verra Mobility (“Verra Mobility”), is in force. As a requirement of and in performance of that contract between , and Verra Mobility, it will be necessary for Verra Mobility to access motor vehicle data on our agency’s behalf. This program will operate within the Axsis environment under partner ORI AZNlets97. Please accept this letter as authorization from the for Verra Mobility to run motor vehicle inquiries for this purpose. This authorization will automatically expire upon the termination of the contract between , and Verra Mobility; and such authorization is limited to violations detected by the automated enforcement camera systems. By completing the information below and signing this letter, I am stating that I am a member of, and have the authority to extend this authorization on behalf of, the . SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION Subscriber Agency/Name Nlets Agency ORI Name of Authorized Representative Title of Authorized Representative Mailing Address Telephone Fax Email Signature of Authorized Representative Date Signed Page 227 of 269 EXHIBIT E RETENTION SCHEDULE*** [This schedule to be completed by Customer in conformity with their applicable state and local law prior to execution of the Agreement.] Type of Record Minimum Verra Mobility Retention Period Violation Images* (including video clips and related metadata) 3 years from payment or final adjudication Non-Violation Images (including video clips and related metadata)** 60 days from Event capture date Warning Notice Images (including video clips and related metadata) 60 days from issuance date Individually Identifiable Violation Records* months from payment or final adjudication Individually Identifiable Non-Violation Records** days from Event capture date Audio recording from contact center 90 days from call Written correspondence with citizens regarding Violations 1 year from date of correspondence Camera System Calibration/Certification Records months from payment or final adjudication of an applicable Violation Maintenance Records months from payment or final adjudication of an applicable Violation Other Program Records years from termination of the Agreement * Violation Image: an image of a Violation issued as a Citation. Individually Identifiable Violation Records: a record containing individually identifiable information pertaining to a Violation issued as a Citation. ** Non-Violation Image: an image of an Event not issued as a Citation. Individually Identifiable Non-Violation Records: a record containing individually identifiable information pertaining to an Event not issued as a Citation. *** Retention period is not applicable upon termination of the Agreement and the data is provided to Customer pursuant to Section 14 of the Agreement. This records retention schedule does not apply to any Event data captured by the Camera System, but not uploaded into BOS. For the avoidance of doubt, this records retention schedule does not apply to any records related to any Pilot Data[,nor does this records retention schedule apply to any ALPR images, metadata, or other ALPR related data]. Page 228 of 269 EXHIBIT F FORM PARTICIPANT AGREEMENT AND THE SUBMERCHANT AGREEMENT Page 229 of 269 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 19, 2025 TO: Dave Zabell, Interim City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 2/24/25 FROM: Maria Serra, Public Works Director Public Works SUBJECT: Irrigation Utility Revenue Requirements & Connection Charges (20 minutes staff presentation) I. ATTACHMENT(S): Presentation Outreach Engagement Report Outreach Media Stories Support II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Irrigation Utility Rates and Fees IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City operates an irrigation utility system serving over 9,000 customers over a large portion of the north westerly portion of the City. The utility was established through the purchase an existing private agricultural irrigation system in 2002. Since then, the irrigation service area and the system itself has been improved and expanded through private development and city-initiated capital improvements across the service area. The irrigation system operates independent of the City’s potable water system. While the irrigation and water utilities are separate and distinct systems, the irrigation utility benefits potable water system customers by limiting demand for potable water in the summer months (for non-potable purposes: irrigation) by properties within the irrigation system service area. The operational cost to provide potable water is significantly higher than irrigation water. Additionally, if the potable water system were expected to meet all non-potable demands, the result would be the need for greater capital investments in the potable water system along with higher water rates for all ratepayers, and the need to acquire significantly more Page 230 of 269 water rights for potable water system. Water for the utility is sourced from an intake at the Columbia River and 11 well sites. Since the last rate study (2017), the irrigation utility customer count has grown by approximately 25%. In 2018, a detailed evaluation of the system found supply deficiencies within the existing area of service, resulting in low pressure areas with no capacity for expansion. In response, a series of projects and operational changes were initiated by the City. Prior to this, the system had historically not required significant capital reinvestment on the part of the City outside of upsizing and looping of mains to adjust to residential rather and agricultural uses. With system the demand increased within well including aging, infrastructure, original service area and potential expansion, additional and more significant investment is required. V. DISCUSSION: In 2023, the City engaged FCS Group to conduct a rate study and connection fee analysis. The revenue rate evaluated all expense elements of the utility system, including operations and maintenance, debt service and capital costs over the planning horizon from 2025 - 2030. Based on this analysis rates can then be calculated to ensure utility revenues are sufficient to cover the costs of operating the utility in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, allow for payment for debt service obligations as well as meet bond covenant requirements, and invest in planned capital needs and system renewal. It is worth noting that unlike the potable water system, the irrigation customers are unmetered, to each property is charged a flat rate. Consistent and pro-active utility planning and appropriate rates are necessary to support the financial health utility and ensure reliable service to system users. Rate commensurate with the true cost of service are viewed favorably by bond rating agencies as they are an indicator of the stability of the utility. A strong bond rating makes City bonds more marketable garnering lower interest rates. revenue and requirements calculate process undertaken The to connection charges was presented to Council on October 24, 2024 by FCS Group. Unlike utility rates, a connection charge is a one-time fee that is applied to new system users and represents the purchase of a pro rata share of the cost of providing system capacity based on infrastructure investment that has already occurred via and planned capacity improvements. Revenues collected connection charges cannot support operations and maintenance costs but instead are accumulated to pay for new capital projects that rehabilitate or expand the system or increase capacity. Page 231 of 269 As a comparison familiar to Council, the City's water and sewer utilities provide for connection charge fees on new connection that are used to fund system capital improvements. Without established connection fees for new system users, the full cost of capital improvements for expansion of the system would fall on all existing ratepayers; a classic growth paying for the impacts of growth and reducing development costs on existing system users challenge all municipalities face. During the most recent discussion on irrigation rates and connection fees, Council directed staff to conduct a broad outreach effort and collect feedback. Staff's efforts outreach the of presentation an encompasses overview performed and the feedback collected. The outreach efforts included two press releases, multiple media interviews in TV radio and newspaper, Social Media campaign in multiple platforms, launch of informational website and comment and two public meetings with target audiences (development community) and general public, respectively. Not surprisingly, general public feedback was not supportive of increased rates and provided a mixed message on connection fees. A clear theme though was the existing users did not feel if fair they be burdened with the cost of expansion development. generally new Developers system the for for abstained from providing an opinion on the rate increase or the maximum connection fee proposed. The $1468 of fee calculated a per resulted analysis fee connection in residential connection. Council has great discretion in the fee and can set a fee of $0 up to $1468 per new connection. The balance to this issue is that the establishment of a connection fee less than the calculated amount will then have to be made up through increased monthly rates across the utility, or reduced expenses and level of service. For most utility services, biggest drivers of rate increases are capital projects and that is true in this case. By local comparison, it is worth noting that BMID, Columbia Irrigation District, Benton or Franklin Irrigation Districts do not have an established connection fee for system buy-in, however some have had physical connections for meters. The one entity that comes very close to a connection fee is Kennewick Irrigation District ( https://kid.org/rates/ ). They have several areas where they apply a capital surcharge amortized over ten years that is related to capital projects in the area. They have a handful that are between $500-$1200 annually a period ten years. But largely, these other utilities are for of structured such that the burden of system improvement, rehabilitation or expansion, falls to all ratepayers to fund. Page 232 of 269 Proposal Impact: With connection fee: The average rate increase - $45/year or $3.70/month. City's current rate is $222/year. 2027 rate is projected to be $355. Without the connection fee: The average rate increase is $52/year or $4.35/month. City's current rate is $222/year. 2027 rate is projected to be $378. Below are yearly rates for neighboring jurisdiction: Council has several policy considerations to consider with respect to the immediate and long-term needs of the system in the areas of sustainability of providing irrigation water vs residential irrigating with potable water and providing economical irrigation choices to our residents. If the City is to expand the irrigation system to serve the areas to the north and west, Council can move forward with: 1. Full connection fee of $1498 and the average rate increase of $45/year. 2. No connection fee and the average rate increase of $52/year. 3. Connection fee between $0-$1498 and corresponding rate increase. The rehabilitation projects driving the rate increases are required to ensure the level of that service for the existing system can be maintained. The projects relating to the expansion of the system that help us serve new customers, can Page 233 of 269 be funded through a connection fee. Staff highly recommends Council to fund the rehabilitation projects as lack of them will impact the level of service for our current customers. Furthermore, serving future customers in the expansion area with potable water will significantly increase the costs to the potable water system in the long term; negatively impacting all water utility customers of our City. Under current circumstances, staff does not see using potable water for irrigation into the area to the north and west as a viable option. Staff is looking for policy direction from Council with respect to their preference on how costs for the expansion of the irrigation system should be funded; a pure growth fund the impact of growth model, all system ratepayers fund the burden of capital costs for system expansion, or something in-between. Page 234 of 269 Slide 1 CITY OF PASCO Irrigation Revenue Requirement & Connection Charge Analysis October 21, 2024 Pa g e 2 3 5 o f 2 6 9 Slide 2 Discussion Overview ●Background ●Revenue requirement analysis »Overview »Key assumptions »Fiscal policies »Results ●Connection charge analysis »Overview / methodology »Calculation »Results ●Next steps Pa g e 2 3 6 o f 2 6 9 Slide 3 Background ●City operates an irrigation system that is independent of City’s potable water system ●Current sources include 11 wells and an intake at Columbia River ●2018 study determined the system was operating at a deficit of supply. ●A series of projects and operational changes were recommended to alleviate the deficiency Pa g e 2 3 7 o f 2 6 9 Slide 4 Background ●3 wells were rehabilitated/repaired during winter 2023/24. ●Modified valving configuration in intake supply line ●Designed pump station for incorporating SCBID/USBR supply to City’s system. ●M&I contract with USBR drafted for “Water rental” Pa g e 2 3 8 o f 2 6 9 Slide 5 Service Area Pa g e 2 3 9 o f 2 6 9 Slide 6 Background ●Paired with rapid growth the system capacity deficiencies are exacerbated. ●Infrastructure investments are needed to support current and future non-potable irrigation ratepayers ●Future financial obligations require review of revenue needs ●Tonight’s focus: »Revenue requirement »Connection charges Pa g e 2 4 0 o f 2 6 9 Slide 7 Irrigation Revenue Requirement Pa g e 2 4 1 o f 2 6 9 Slide 8 Revenue Requirement Overview ●Determine the amount of annual revenue necessary »Operating and maintenance expenses »Debt service (principal & interest) »Capital costs ●Meet financial parameters and targets »Debt service coverage ratios »Maintain reserve balances ●Evaluate revenue sufficiency over multi -year period ●Develop rate plan to balance financial needs and minimize customer impacts Pa g e 2 4 2 o f 2 6 9 Slide 9 Key Assumptions ●Study period 2025 – 2030 ●Projected rate revenue based on 2023 actuals plus growth determined from irrigation master plan ●Customer growth: 3.80% - 2.50% »500 new connections 2025 & 2026, 380 new connections/year thereafter ●2023/2024 revised biennial budget used as baseline – with escalation factors for future years »Forecast includes –Water rental charges: $300k annually beginning in 2025 –Additional electricity costs from pump station addition: 5% increase in costs in 2026 (~$20k) »Cost inflation: averages 3.0% per year ●New debt »Recent revenue bond issued in 2024 - $8.7M in proceeds and $700,000 of annual debt service »Future debt assumes revenue bond financing with a 20 -year term, 5.0% interest rate and 1.0% issuance cost Pa g e 2 4 3 o f 2 6 9 Slide 10 Fiscal Policies Policy Purpose Target Operating Reserve To provide sufficient cash flow to meet daily operating expenses (short-term, annual revenue cycles) 60 Days O&M ($406k -$493k) Capital Contingency Reserve To provide a source of funding for emergency repairs, unanticipated capital, and project cost overruns. 1 % of Asset Values ($388k - $454k) Debt Service Coverage To ensure compliance with existing loan/debt covenants and maintain credit worthiness for future debt issuance. Minimum Bond Covenant Requirement 1.25 ●Help guide financial management of the City Pa g e 2 4 4 o f 2 6 9 Slide 11 Key Components ●Total CIP of $13.9M funded by cash, future connection charges, and revenue bond proceeds »Recent revenue bond issued in 2024 - $8.7M in proceeds and $700,000 of annual debt service »New $2.7M revenue bond in 2026 ●CIP includes irrigation system expansion, Broadmoor area irrigation main extension, well capacity upgrades and Columbia River intake capacity retrofit Description 2024-2030 O&M Expenses $2.19 mil - $2.77 mil Existing Debt Service $700,000 Future Debt Service $238,000 Total CIP (2024-2030)$13,873,568Pa g e 2 4 5 o f 2 6 9 Slide 12 Revenue Requirement Summary Irrigation Sample Bill Existing 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Proposed Increases 17.00%17.00%17.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% Sample Residential Annualized Bill $221.55 $259.21 $303.28 $354.84 $365.48 $376.45 $387.74 $ Difference 37.66$ 44.07$ 51.56$ 10.65$ 10.96$ 11.29$ Note: Assumes Base rate for one Single Family Unit (rates are billed 7 months of the year from April - October) Pa g e 2 4 6 o f 2 6 9 Slide 13 Annualized Residential Rate Comparison Note: Assumes base rate for one single family unit (Pasco irrigation rates are billed 7 months out of the year, from April – October) and 1 acre or less of irrigated area Pa g e 2 4 7 o f 2 6 9 Slide 14 Connection Charges Pa g e 2 4 8 o f 2 6 9 Slide 15 Overview: What Is a Connection Charge? ●One time charge imposed on new development or expanded connection to system ●Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 35.92.025 grants Cities the authority to fix rates and charges for connecting to water & wastewater systems ●Represents a pro rata share of the cost of providing system capacity ●Based on cost of system infrastructure investment »Allows for both existing and future costs »May not be used to recover operation and maintenance costs ●Consists of two parts »Existing cost basis: intends to recognize the current ratepayers’ net investment in the original cost of the non-donated system »Future cost basis: intends to include future facilities needed to serve growth, including regulatory system improvements Pa g e 2 4 9 o f 2 6 9 Slide 16 ●Existing costs »Existing assets (original cost) »less: contributions (dev. / grants) »plus: interest (maximum 10 years) ●Future costs »Future capacity expanding capital »less: ineligible projects (plans / studies) »less: repairs and replacement projects Methodology EXISTING COST BASIS CURRENT & FUTURE CAPACITY FUTURE COST BASIS FUTURE CAPACITY CC Pa g e 2 5 0 o f 2 6 9 Slide 17 Existing Cost Basis Calculation Component Characteristics Amount 1. Original Cost of Current Assets Based on inventory of City assets through 2023.$31.5 million 2. Less: Contributions Excluding assets that were funded by other entities.$(23.8) million 4. Plus: Interest RCW allows for inclusion of up to ten years of interest on each asset, not to exceed the original cost of the asset. $2.3 million 5. Less: Debt Principal Outstanding Excluded since customers will pay for their share of debt service through user rates.$(6.6) million Total Existing Cost Basis $3.3 million Pa g e 2 5 1 o f 2 6 9 Slide 18 Future Cost Basis Calculation Component Characteristics Amount 1. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Projects identified in the City’s capital improvement plan. All project costs in 2024 dollars. $14.2 million 2. Less: Renewal & Replacement Projects Future cost basis includes only capacity enhancing projects. Deducting projects that will replace aging infrastructure. $(2.5) million Total Future Cost Basis $11.7 million Pa g e 2 5 2 o f 2 6 9 Slide 19 Connection Charge Calculation Cost Basis Applicable Customers Total Existing Cost Basis – $3.3M Current & Future Capacity – 21,857 ERUs $151 Future Cost Basis – $11.7M Future Capacity – 8,857 ERUs $1,317 Total Connection Charge per ERU $1,468 Current CC per ERU $0 Note: ERU = Equivalent Residential Unit Pa g e 2 5 3 o f 2 6 9 Slide 20 Connection Charge Results ●Calculated maximum connection charge = $1,468 per ERU »1 single family residence = 1 ERU »ERU = 1.36 gallons per minute (non -residential uses calculated) ●Calculated charges are “maximum allowable” »By policy may set below maximum allowable and / or phased-in –Rates make up the difference »May be adjusted annually by an accredited inflation index (e.g., ENR CCI) Pa g e 2 5 4 o f 2 6 9 Slide 21 Rate Forecast Comparison w/o CCs ●Revenue requirement scenario assumes connection charges are implemented at calculated maximum in 2025 ●In absence of connection charges, rate revenues will need to increase to fund all obligations ●Rate forecast without connection charges: »Requires $4.7M in new debt in 2026 (increase of $2.0M over baseline) Irrigation Sample Bill Existing 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Proposed Increases 19.50%19.50%19.50%3.00%3.00%3.00% Sample Residential Annualized Bill $221.55 $264.75 $316.38 $378.07 $389.42 $401.10 $413.13 $ Difference 43.20$ 51.63$ 61.69$ 11.34$ 11.68$ 12.03$ Note: Assumes Base rate for one Single Family Unit (rates are billed 7 months of the year from April - October) Pa g e 2 5 5 o f 2 6 9 Slide 22 Policy Decision ●Establish a connection charge for new connections? –At the calculated maximum of $1,468 per ERU? ●Implement annual rate increases for irrigation utility based on forecast? w/Connection Fee: w/o Connection Fee: Irrigation Sample Bill Existing 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Proposed Increases 17.00%17.00%17.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% Sample Residential Annualized Bill $221.55 $259.21 $303.28 $354.84 $365.48 $376.45 $387.74 $ Difference 37.66$ 44.07$ 51.56$ 10.65$ 10.96$ 11.29$ Note: Assumes Base rate for one Single Family Unit (rates are billed 7 months of the year from April - October) Irrigation Sample Bill Existing 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Proposed Increases 19.50%19.50%19.50%3.00%3.00%3.00% Sample Residential Annualized Bill $221.55 $264.75 $316.38 $378.07 $389.42 $401.10 $413.13 $ Difference 43.20$ 51.63$ 61.69$ 11.34$ 11.68$ 12.03$ Note: Assumes Base rate for one Single Family Unit (rates are billed 7 months of the year from April - October) Pa g e 2 5 6 o f 2 6 9 Slide 23 Next Steps ●Incorporate Council direction ●Outreach based on Council direction ●Effective date for rate increase is recommended for 2025 Irrigation Season (April to October)Pa g e 2 5 7 o f 2 6 9 Slide 24 Thank you! Questions? Brooke Tacia, Project Manager 425-502-6225 brooket@fcsgroup.com www.fcsgroup.com Pa g e 2 5 8 o f 2 6 9 Engagement Report: Irrigation Rate Increase Study Campaign Executive Summary The City of Pasco's Irrigation Rate Increase Study Campaign, conducted between November 2024 and January 2025, demonstrated effective use of diverse communication tactics to engage residents and developers about possible rate changes. The campaign garnered attention through traditional and digital media, with 25 traditional media stories generated, and impactful placed segments on KONA and KNDU. The dedicated webpage for the irrigation rate study attracted 584 visits and 38 formal comment submissions, reflecting a moderate level of public interest. The modest number of meeting comments suggest that while outreach was broad, active participation was somewhat limited. On social media, the campaign achieved 12,296 total impressions across Facebook, Instagram, NextDoor, and LinkedIn, a robust indicator of its reach. However, engagement, as seen in the 63 total comments and 18 shares, although respectable, indicates room for enhancing interaction. These metrics serve as valuable feedback for refining future messaging and engagement strategies to foster more active community involvement. The campaign's focus on transparency and community input supports the City's commitment to keeping residents informed and involved in decisions impacting their utility rates. Media • Press releases sent: 12/3/24 & 1/6/25 o Stories generated: 25 o Media Report attached (Irrigation Outreach_Media Stories Report) • City-initiated media placements: o KONA interviews: 12/30/24 o KNDU “Pasco Pulse” segment: 12/28/24 Website • Irrigation Rate Study webpage hits: 584 • Front Page “News Flash” story: o Page hits: 2 o Opt-In push notice subscribers: 212 • Comment forms online from 11/26/24-1/24/25: o Total Submissions: 38 o Form webpage hits: 136 • Comment report attached (Irrigation Outreach_Online Comment Forms Report.zip) Page 259 of 269 Community Meetings • Developer Outreach Meeting December 11th, 2024: o Comments: 5 • Community Outreach Meeting January 13th, 2025: o Comments: 4 • Comment report attached (Irrigation Outreach_Social Public Meeting Comment Report) Social Media • Total social media posts appeared on Facebook, Instagram, NextDoor and LinkedIn: o Total Impressions: 12,296 o Total Comments: 63 o Total Shares: 18 • Comment report attached (Irrigation Outreach_Social Media Comment Report) Page 260 of 269 Pasco, WA | January 24th, 2025 Stories Report Online Publication YAHOO FINANCE Dec 11, 2024, 1200 AM Pasco just spent $1.4M so more homes can be built. Hereʼs where the money is going Pasco just spent $1.4M so more homes can be built. Hereʼs where the money is going Pasco is buying nearly $1.4 million in water rights to keep up with the cityʼs rapid growth and development because it has nearly exhausted its existing rights.… Show all Reach:3,436,119,916 Online Publication NBC RIGHT NOW Dec 27, 2024, 244 PM Cit y of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 PASCO, Wash. – The City of Pasco is proposing increased irrigation rates and a connection fee for new customers starting in 2025. The city says more funding is needed to keep irrigation services reliable, while improving systems and preparing for growth. There is an upcoming listening session on Monday, Jan 13 for the public to learn about the proposed… Show all Reach:189,046 Online Publication FOX41YAKIMA.COM Dec 27, 2024, 244 PM Cit y of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 PASCO, Wash. – The City of Pasco is proposing increased irrigation rates and a connection… The post City of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 first appeared on Fox 11 Tri Cities Fox 41 Yakima. Reach:19,364 Online Publication NBC RIGHT NOW Dec 27, 2024, 244 PM Cit y of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 PASCO, Wash. – The City of Pasco is proposing increased irrigation rates and a connection fee for new customers starting in 2025. The city says more funding is needed to keep irrigation services reliable, while improving systems and preparing for… Reach:189,046 Created By Pasco, WA | January 24th, 2025 Stories Report Online Publication YAHOO FINANCE Dec 11, 2024, 1200 AM Pasco just spent $1.4M so more homes can be built. Hereʼs where the money is going Pasco just spent $1.4M so more homes can be built. Hereʼs where the money is going Pasco is buying nearly $1.4 million in water rights to keep up with the cityʼs rapid growth and development because it has nearly exhausted its existing rights.… Show all Reach:3,436,119,916 Online Publication NBC RIGHT NOW Dec 27, 2024, 244 PM Cit y of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 PASCO, Wash. – The City of Pasco is proposing increased irrigation rates and a connection fee for new customers starting in 2025. The city says more funding is needed to keep irrigation services reliable, while improving systems and preparing for growth. There is an upcoming listening session on Monday, Jan 13 for the public to learn about the proposed… Show all Reach:189,046 Online Publication FOX41YAKIMA.COM Dec 27, 2024, 244 PM Cit y of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 PASCO, Wash. – The City of Pasco is proposing increased irrigation rates and a connection… The post City of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 first appeared on Fox 11 Tri Cities Fox 41 Yakima. Reach:19,364 Online Publication NBC RIGHT NOW Dec 27, 2024, 244 PM Cit y of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 PASCO, Wash. – The City of Pasco is proposing increased irrigation rates and a connection fee for new customers starting in 2025. The city says more funding is needed to keep irrigation services reliable, while improving systems and preparing for… Reach:189,046 01 Page 261 of 269 Online Publication NBC RIGHT NOW Dec 27, 2024, 244 PM Cit y of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 Kennewick, WA 99336 Today Cloudy. Periods of light rain early. Low near 45F. Winds SSW at 10 to 20 mph. Chance of rain 90%.. Tonight… Show all Reach:189,046 Online Publication FOX41YAKIMA.COM Dec 27, 2024, 1144 AM Cit y of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 PASCO, Wash. – The City of Pasco is proposing increased irrigation rates and a connection fee for new customers starting in 2025. The city says more funding is needed to keep irrigation services reliable, while improving systems and preparing for growth. There is an upcoming [listening session] (https://www.facebook.com/events/1697498317521633/?… Show all Reach:19,364 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 27, 2024, 914 AM Local News at 5pm ... that zoom meeting on nonstop local dot com. pasco irrigation district wants to hear from residents as well ... on its own proposed rate increases ... the city says it needs more funding to improve the irigation service and prepare for growth ... you can learn more about the changes and ask questions at the public listening session on monday january 13th at six pm ... it's at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft teams ...… Show all Reach:2,149 Value:$197 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 27, 2024, 1006 AM Local News at 6pm ... that zoom meeting on nonstop local dot com. pasco irrigation district wants to hear from residents as well ... on its own proposed rate increases ... the city says it neds more funding to improve the irrigation service and prepare for growth . you can learn more about the... Reach:1,633 Value:$232 Created By Online Publication NBC RIGHT NOW Dec 27, 2024, 244 PM Cit y of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 Kennewick, WA 99336 Today Cloudy. Periods of light rain early. Low near 45F. Winds SSW at 10 to 20 mph. Chance of rain 90%.. Tonight… Show all Reach:189,046 Online Publication FOX41YAKIMA.COM Dec 27, 2024, 1144 AM Cit y of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 PASCO, Wash. – The City of Pasco is proposing increased irrigation rates and a connection fee for new customers starting in 2025. The city says more funding is needed to keep irrigation services reliable, while improving systems and preparing for growth. There is an upcoming [listening session] (https://www.facebook.com/events/1697498317521633/?… Show all Reach:19,364 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 27, 2024, 914 AM Local News at 5pm ... that zoom meeting on nonstop local dot com. pasco irrigation district wants to hear from residents as well ... on its own proposed rate increases ... the city says it needs more funding to improve the irigation service and prepare for growth ... you can learn more about the changes and ask questions at the public listening session on monday january 13th at six pm ... it's at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft teams ...… Show all Reach:2,149 Value:$197 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 27, 2024, 1006 AM Local News at 6pm ... that zoom meeting on nonstop local dot com. pasco irrigation district wants to hear from residents as well ... on its own proposed rate increases ... the city says it neds more funding to improve the irrigation service and prepare for growth . you can learn more about the... Reach:1,633 Value:$232 02 Page 262 of 269 Online Publication FOX41YAKIMA.COM Dec 27, 2024, 1200 AM Cit y of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 | Fox 11 Tri Cities Fox 41 Yakima PASCO, Wash. – The City of Pasco is proposing increased irrigation rates and a connection fee for new customers starting in 2025. The city says more funding is needed to keep irrigation services reliable, while improving systems and preparing for growth. There is an upcoming listening session on Monday, Jan 13 for the public to learn about the proposed… Show all Reach:19,364 Online Publication APPLEVALLEYNEWSNOW.COM Jan 6, 2025, 433 PM PA MAN HIT BY PLOW TRUCK | National News | applevalleynewsnow.com ... affecting 2 million Washingtonians Washington Supreme Court to decide on Mabton mayor's recall appeal next week Latest News Chilly Tuesday with Lingering Freezing Fog, Possible Light Showers in Washington Cascades Harman Senior Center collecting donations for YWCA Yakima families in need City of Pasco proposes increased irrigation rates for improvements, community invited for feedback TMobile accused … Show all Reach:83,883 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 27, 2024, 308 PM Local News at 11pm ... that zoom meeting on nonstop local dot com. pasco irrigation district wants to hear from residents as well ... on its own proposed rate increases . the city says it needs more funding to improve the irrigation service and prepare for growth . you can learn more about the changes and ask questions at the public listening session on monday january 13th at six pm ... it's at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft teams ...… Show all Reach:1,122 Value:$286 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 27, 2024, 546 PM Local News at 11pm ... that zoom meeting on nonstop local dot com. pasco irrigation district wants to hear from residents as well ... on its own proposed rate increases . the city says it needs more funding to improve the irrigation service and prepare for growth . you can learn more about the changes and ask questions at the public listening session on monday january 13th at six pm ... it's at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft teams ...… Show all Reach:333 Value:$90 Created By Online Publication FOX41YAKIMA.COM Dec 27, 2024, 1200 AM Cit y of Pasco proposing increased irrigation rates starting 2025 | Fox 11 Tri Cities Fox 41 Yakima PASCO, Wash. – The City of Pasco is proposing increased irrigation rates and a connection fee for new customers starting in 2025. The city says more funding is needed to keep irrigation services reliable, while improving systems and preparing for growth. There is an upcoming listening session on Monday, Jan 13 for the public to learn about the proposed… Show all Reach:19,364 Online Publication APPLEVALLEYNEWSNOW.COM Jan 6, 2025, 433 PM PA MAN HIT BY PLOW TRUCK | National News | applevalleynewsnow.com ... affecting 2 million Washingtonians Washington Supreme Court to decide on Mabton mayor's recall appeal next week Latest News Chilly Tuesday with Lingering Freezing Fog, Possible Light Showers in Washington Cascades Harman Senior Center collecting donations for YWCA Yakima families in need City of Pasco proposes increased irrigation rates for improvements, community invited for feedback TMobile accused … Show all Reach:83,883 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 27, 2024, 308 PM Local News at 11pm ... that zoom meeting on nonstop local dot com. pasco irrigation district wants to hear from residents as well ... on its own proposed rate increases . the city says it needs more funding to improve the irrigation service and prepare for growth . you can learn more about the changes and ask questions at the public listening session on monday january 13th at six pm ... it's at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft teams ...… Show all Reach:1,122 Value:$286 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 27, 2024, 546 PM Local News at 11pm ... that zoom meeting on nonstop local dot com. pasco irrigation district wants to hear from residents as well ... on its own proposed rate increases . the city says it needs more funding to improve the irrigation service and prepare for growth . you can learn more about the changes and ask questions at the public listening session on monday january 13th at six pm ... it's at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft teams ...… Show all Reach:333 Value:$90 03 Page 263 of 269 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 27, 2024, 1109 PM Wake Up Northwest ... that zoom meeting on nonstop local dot com. pasco irrigation district wants to hear from residents as well ... on its own proposed rate increases . the city says it needs more funding to improve the irrigation service and prepare for growth .. you can learn more about the changes and ask questions at the public listening session on monday january 13th at six pm ... it's at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft teams ...… Show all Reach:2,432 Value:$388 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 28, 2024, 1209 AM Wake Up Northwest ... com. pasco irrigation district wants to hear from residents as well ... on its own proposed rate increases ... the city says it needs more funding to improve the irrigation service and prepare for growth .. you can learn more about the changes and ask questions at the public listening session on monday january 13th at six pm ... it's at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft teams ... sharing some good this morning...… Show all Reach:2,051 Value:$257 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 29, 2024, 905 PM Wake Up Northwest ... on monday january 13th at six pm ... it's at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft... Reach:436 Value:$109 Online Publication NEWSTALK870.AM Jan 6, 2025, 115 PM Potential Utilit y Price Increase Coming For Pasco? Potential Utilit y Price Increase Coming For Pasco? 2025 may be the year of rate increases around the Tri-Cities. Kennewick announced roughly 5 and 3 percent increases to their water and sewer charges for residents. The State Utilities and Transportation Commission just held a public hearing last week on Cascade Natural Gas' proposed rate increase for their… Show all Reach:60,072 Created By Broadcast Media NBC Dec 27, 2024, 1109 PM Wake Up Northwest ... that zoom meeting on nonstop local dot com. pasco irrigation district wants to hear from residents as well ... on its own proposed rate increases . the city says it needs more funding to improve the irrigation service and prepare for growth .. you can learn more about the changes and ask questions at the public listening session on monday january 13th at six pm ... it's at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft teams ...… Show all Reach:2,432 Value:$388 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 28, 2024, 1209 AM Wake Up Northwest ... com. pasco irrigation district wants to hear from residents as well ... on its own proposed rate increases ... the city says it needs more funding to improve the irrigation service and prepare for growth .. you can learn more about the changes and ask questions at the public listening session on monday january 13th at six pm ... it's at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft teams ... sharing some good this morning...… Show all Reach:2,051 Value:$257 Broadcast Media NBC Dec 29, 2024, 905 PM Wake Up Northwest ... on monday january 13th at six pm ... it's at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft... Reach:436 Value:$109 Online Publication NEWSTALK870.AM Jan 6, 2025, 115 PM Potential Utilit y Price Increase Coming For Pasco? Potential Utilit y Price Increase Coming For Pasco? 2025 may be the year of rate increases around the Tri-Cities. Kennewick announced roughly 5 and 3 percent increases to their water and sewer charges for residents. The State Utilities and Transportation Commission just held a public hearing last week on Cascade Natural Gas' proposed rate increase for their… Show all Reach:60,072 04 Page 264 of 269 Online Publication YAKTRINEWS.COM Jan 6, 2025, 221 PM Cit y of Pasco proposes increased irrigation rates for improvements, communit y invited for feedback PASCO, Wash. -- The City of Pasco is inviting the community to join a listening session for its proposed increase in irrigation rates. The community listening session is scheduled for Monday, January 13, 2025 at 6 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Pasco City Hall located at 525 North 3rd Avenue.… Show all Reach:4,460 Online Publication AOL Dec 11, 2024, 1200 AM Pasco just spent $1.4M so more homes can be built. Hereʼs where the money is going Pasco just spent $1.4M so more homes can be built. Hereʼs where the money is going Pasco is buying nearly $1.4 million in water rights to keep up with the cityʼs rapid growth and development because it has nearly exhausted its existing rights.… Show all Reach:298,991,423 Online Publication APPLEVALLEYNEWSNOW.COM Jan 6, 2025, 1223 PM Relative arrested following death of three women in Brazil Christmas cake poisoning | World News |… ... trailer fire near Finley Monday morning Washington Supreme Court to decide on Mabton mayor's recall appeal next week The Department of Ecology addresses concerns and grants for Clean Vehicles Program in Washington State Latest News Harman Senior Center collecting donations for YWCA Yakima families in need City of Pasco proposes increased irrigation rates for improvements, community invited for feedback… Show all Reach:83,883 Online Publication APPLEVALLEYNEWSNOW.COM Jan 6, 2025, 1228 PM Good Morning Northwest @ 5 a.m. - January 3, 2025 | Video | applevalleynewsnow.com ... trailer fire near Finley Monday morning Washington Supreme Court to decide on Mabton mayor's recall appeal next week The Department of Ecology addresses concerns and grants for Clean Vehicles Program in Washington State Latest News Harman Senior Center collecting donations for YWCA Yakima families in need City of Pasco proposes increased irrigation rates for improvements, community invited for feedback… Show all Reach:83,883 Created By Online Publication YAKTRINEWS.COM Jan 6, 2025, 221 PM Cit y of Pasco proposes increased irrigation rates for improvements, communit y invited for feedback PASCO, Wash. -- The City of Pasco is inviting the community to join a listening session for its proposed increase in irrigation rates. The community listening session is scheduled for Monday, January 13, 2025 at 6 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Pasco City Hall located at 525 North 3rd Avenue.… Show all Reach:4,460 Online Publication AOL Dec 11, 2024, 1200 AM Pasco just spent $1.4M so more homes can be built. Hereʼs where the money is going Pasco just spent $1.4M so more homes can be built. Hereʼs where the money is going Pasco is buying nearly $1.4 million in water rights to keep up with the cityʼs rapid growth and development because it has nearly exhausted its existing rights.… Show all Reach:298,991,423 Online Publication APPLEVALLEYNEWSNOW.COM Jan 6, 2025, 1223 PM Relative arrested following death of three women in Brazil Christmas cake poisoning | World News |… ... trailer fire near Finley Monday morning Washington Supreme Court to decide on Mabton mayor's recall appeal next week The Department of Ecology addresses concerns and grants for Clean Vehicles Program in Washington State Latest News Harman Senior Center collecting donations for YWCA Yakima families in need City of Pasco proposes increased irrigation rates for improvements, community invited for feedback… Show all Reach:83,883 Online Publication APPLEVALLEYNEWSNOW.COM Jan 6, 2025, 1228 PM Good Morning Northwest @ 5 a.m. - January 3, 2025 | Video | applevalleynewsnow.com ... trailer fire near Finley Monday morning Washington Supreme Court to decide on Mabton mayor's recall appeal next week The Department of Ecology addresses concerns and grants for Clean Vehicles Program in Washington State Latest News Harman Senior Center collecting donations for YWCA Yakima families in need City of Pasco proposes increased irrigation rates for improvements, community invited for feedback… Show all Reach:83,883 05 Page 265 of 269 Online Publication NEWSBREAK.COM Jan 10, 2025, 557 PM Irrigation costs slated to rise for Pasco residents - NewsBreak ... Allen Leister , 5 hours ago PASCO, WA. - Folks in Pasco could see an increase in their irrigation costs this year. City leaders tell KEPR News a proposal is being considered to raise irrigation rates by 17% every year for the next three years to help pay for upgrades, maintenance fees, and to adjust for the growing population within the city, which has seen a rise of 25% since 2017. After the three years, prices would… Show all Reach:31,827,358 Online Publication KEPRTV.COM Jan 10, 2025, 1257 PM Irrigation costs slated to rise for Pasco residents PASCO, WA. - Folks in Pasco could see an increase in their irrigation costs this year. City leaders tell KEPR News a proposal is being considered to raise irrigation rates by 17% every year for the next three years to help pay for upgrades, maintenance fees, and to adjust for the growing population within the city, which has seen a rise of 25% since 2017. After the three years, prices would continue to rise by 3% every year to… Show all Reach:103,109 Broadcast Media CBS Jan 12, 2025, 905 PM Action News 5a ... up on our website, keeper tv.com folks in pasco could be seeing an increase in their irrigation costs this year. city leaders tell us a proposal is being looked at to raise rates 17% every year for the next three years to help pay for upgrades, maintenance and to adjust for the growing population. they say the average price hike would be less than $40 for a single family unit. >>our rates for irrigation system are the lowest by a lo… Show all Reach:1,433 Value:$323 Broadcast Media CBS Jan 12, 2025, 1005 PM Action News at 6am ... our website, katie porter. tv.com folks in pasco could be seeing an increase in their irrigation costs this year. city leaders tell us a proposal is being looked at to raise rates 17% every year for the next three years to help pay for upgrades, maintenance and adjust for the growing population. they say the average price hike would be less than $40 for a single family unit. >>our rates for irrigation system are the lowest by a lo… Show all Reach:3,115 Value:$505 Created By Online Publication NEWSBREAK.COM Jan 10, 2025, 557 PM Irrigation costs slated to rise for Pasco residents - NewsBreak ... Allen Leister , 5 hours ago PASCO, WA. - Folks in Pasco could see an increase in their irrigation costs this year. City leaders tell KEPR News a proposal is being considered to raise irrigation rates by 17% every year for the next three years to help pay for upgrades, maintenance fees, and to adjust for the growing population within the city, which has seen a rise of 25% since 2017. After the three years, prices would… Show all Reach:31,827,358 Online Publication KEPRTV.COM Jan 10, 2025, 1257 PM Irrigation costs slated to rise for Pasco residents PASCO, WA. - Folks in Pasco could see an increase in their irrigation costs this year. City leaders tell KEPR News a proposal is being considered to raise irrigation rates by 17% every year for the next three years to help pay for upgrades, maintenance fees, and to adjust for the growing population within the city, which has seen a rise of 25% since 2017. After the three years, prices would continue to rise by 3% every year to… Show all Reach:103,109 Broadcast Media CBS Jan 12, 2025, 905 PM Action News 5a ... up on our website, keeper tv.com folks in pasco could be seeing an increase in their irrigation costs this year. city leaders tell us a proposal is being looked at to raise rates 17% every year for the next three years to help pay for upgrades, maintenance and to adjust for the growing population. they say the average price hike would be less than $40 for a single family unit. >>our rates for irrigation system are the lowest by a lo… Show all Reach:1,433 Value:$323 Broadcast Media CBS Jan 12, 2025, 1005 PM Action News at 6am ... our website, katie porter. tv.com folks in pasco could be seeing an increase in their irrigation costs this year. city leaders tell us a proposal is being looked at to raise rates 17% every year for the next three years to help pay for upgrades, maintenance and adjust for the growing population. they say the average price hike would be less than $40 for a single family unit. >>our rates for irrigation system are the lowest by a lo… Show all Reach:3,115 Value:$505 06 Page 266 of 269 Broadcast Media CBS Jan 10, 2025, 904 AM Action News at 5PM ... arrest and a host of other charges. folks in pasco could be seeing an increase in their irrigation costs this year. city leaders tell us a proposal is being looked at to raise rates 17%... Reach:16,756 Value:$1,195 Broadcast Media CBS Jan 10, 2025, 1004 AM Action News at 6pm ... or go to sinclair. cares act. com. folks in pasco could be seeing an increase in their irrigation costs this year. city leaders tell us a proposal is being looked at to raise rates 17% every year for the next three years to help pay for upgrades, maintenance and adjust for the growing population. they say the average price hike would be less than $40 for a single family unit. >>our rates for irrigation system are the lowest by a… Show all Reach:14,190 Value:$1,627 Online Publication KEPR 19 Jan 10, 2025, 358 PM Irrigation costs slated to rise for Pasco residents PASCO, WA. - Folks in Pasco could see an increase in their irrigation costs this year. City leaders tell KEPR News a proposal is being considered to raise irrigation rates by 17% every year for the next three years to help pay for upgrades, maintenance fees, and to adjust for the growing population within the city, which has seen a rise of 25% since 2017. After the three years, prices would continue to ris… Show all Reach:103,109 Broadcast Media NBC Jan 13, 2025, 909 AM Local News at 5pm ... session tonight at six in person at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft teams ... the link for that meeting is available on non stop local dot com. ben franklin transit is looking for your input on their 2025 service plan... the goal is to provide the public with faster, more frequent and reliable service throughout the coming year... you can make your voice heard by going to the open house session tomorrow night at 6 at… Show all Reach:2,382 Value:$173 Created By Broadcast Media CBS Jan 10, 2025, 904 AM Action News at 5PM ... arrest and a host of other charges. folks in pasco could be seeing an increase in their irrigation costs this year. city leaders tell us a proposal is being looked at to raise rates 17%... Reach:16,756 Value:$1,195 Broadcast Media CBS Jan 10, 2025, 1004 AM Action News at 6pm ... or go to sinclair. cares act. com. folks in pasco could be seeing an increase in their irrigation costs this year. city leaders tell us a proposal is being looked at to raise rates 17% every year for the next three years to help pay for upgrades, maintenance and adjust for the growing population. they say the average price hike would be less than $40 for a single family unit. >>our rates for irrigation system are the lowest by a… Show all Reach:14,190 Value:$1,627 Online Publication KEPR 19 Jan 10, 2025, 358 PM Irrigation costs slated to rise for Pasco residents PASCO, WA. - Folks in Pasco could see an increase in their irrigation costs this year. City leaders tell KEPR News a proposal is being considered to raise irrigation rates by 17% every year for the next three years to help pay for upgrades, maintenance fees, and to adjust for the growing population within the city, which has seen a rise of 25% since 2017. After the three years, prices would continue to ris… Show all Reach:103,109 Broadcast Media NBC Jan 13, 2025, 909 AM Local News at 5pm ... session tonight at six in person at pasco city hall ... or you can join on microsoft teams ... the link for that meeting is available on non stop local dot com. ben franklin transit is looking for your input on their 2025 service plan... the goal is to provide the public with faster, more frequent and reliable service throughout the coming year... you can make your voice heard by going to the open house session tomorrow night at 6 at… Show all Reach:2,382 Value:$173 07 Page 267 of 269 Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re- investment in community infrastructure. City Council Goals QUALITY OF LIFE 2024-2025 Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services and programs. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system. COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK Implement targeted strategies to reduce crime through strategic investments in infrastructure, staffing, and equipment. COMMUNITY SAFETY Promote and encourage economic vitality. ECONOMIC VITALITY Identify opportunities to enhance City of Pasco identity, cohesion, and image. CITY IDENTITY Page 268 of 269 METAS DEL CONCEJO MUNICIPAL 2024-2025 Promover una alta calidad de vida a través de programas, servicios y inversion apropiada y reinversión en la comunidad infraestructura comunitaria. CALIDAD DE VIDA Promover viabilidad financiera a largo plazo, valor, y niveles de calidad de los servicios y programas. SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA Promover un sistema de transporte multimodal altamente funcional. RED DE TRANSPORTE DE LA COMUNIDAD Implementar estrategias específicas para reducir la delincuencia por medios de inversiones estratégicas en infraestructura, personal y equipo. SEGURIDAD DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica. VITALIDAD ECONOMICA Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la cohesión, y la imagen. IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA Page 269 of 269