HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024.11.04 Council Meeting Packet
AGENDA
City Council Regular Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, November 4, 2024
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar
Page
1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would
like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out
the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment)
to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings
must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this meeting.
To listen to the meeting via phone, call 1-323-676-6197 and use access
code 897 432 626#.
City Council meetings are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at
www.facebook.com/cityofPasco.
2. CALL TO ORDER
3. ROLL CALL
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
4. CONSENT AGENDA - All items listed under the Consent Agenda are
considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call
vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate
discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by
Councilmembers, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the
Regular Agenda and considered separately.
6 - 19 (a) Approval of Meeting Minutes for October 21st and October 28th
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting
and Regular Workshop held on October 21, 2024 and October 28,
2024 respectively.
20 - 21 (b) Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total
Amount of $5,711,724.84
Page 1 of 306
To approve claims in the total amount of $5,711,724.84
($2,947,929.19 in Check Nos. 267518 - 267784; $1,514,680.75 in
Electronic Transfer Nos. 848047 - 848086, 848154 - 848299, 848301
- 848370; $1,878.57 in Check Nos. 54841 - 54842; $1,247,236.33 in
Electronic Transfer Nos. 30215691 - 30216354).
22 - 40 (c) Resolution No. 4513 - Acceptance of Work for A Street Phase 1.5
Project
To approve Resolution No. 4513, accepting work performed by
Musco Sports Lighting, LLC., under contract for the A Street Sports
Complex Phase 1.5 Project.
41 - 77 (d) Resolution No. 4514 - Professional Services Agreement
Amendment No. 2 with Jacobs for Butterfield Water Treatment
Plant Improvements
To approve Resolution No. 4514, authorizing the City Manager to
execute Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement
with Jacobs for the Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Improvements
Project.
78 - 121 (e) Resolution No. 4515 - West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Phases
3 and 4 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan Acceptance
To approve Resolution No. 4515, approving and authorizing the City
Manager to execute and deliver the Drinking Water State Revolving
Fund Loan Contract No. DWL293303-0 with the Washington State
Department of Health for the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant
Phases 3 and 4 Improvements.
122 - 131 (f) Resolution No. 4516 - Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Drinking
Water State Revolving Fund Loan Application Approval
To approve Resolution No. 4516, authorizing the submittal a Drinking
Water State Revolving Fund Construction Loan Application for
Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Improvements Project.
132 - 145 (g) Resolution No. 4517 - Change Order No. 6 for the East Urban
Growth Area Expansion Sewer Local Improvement District
No.152 Phase 4 Project
To approve Resolution No. 4517, authorizing the City Manager to
execute Change Order No. 6 with Apollo, Inc. for the East Urban
Growth Area Expansion Sewer Local Improvement District No. 152
Phase 4 Project.
(RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Page 2 of 306
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS - The public may address Council on any items
unless it relates to a scheduled Public Hearing. This item is provided to
allow the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to
express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for
debate or for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate
response. Some questions require consideration by Council over time and
after a deliberative process with input from a number of different sources;
some questions are best directed to staff members who have access to
specific information. Citizen comments will normally be limited to three
minutes each by the Mayor. Those with lengthy messages are invited to
summarize their comments and/or submit written information for
consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings. Lastly, when called
upon, please state your name and city or county residency into the
microphone before providing your comments.
7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS
(a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
8. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO
146 - 159 (a) Public Meeting & Resolution No.4518 - Accepting a Notice of
Intent to Commence Annex Horrigan Farms & Cherry Bloom 10%
Annexation Petition (5 minutes)
CONDUCT A PUBLIC MEETING
MOTION A: I move to approve Resolution No. 4518, accepting a
notice of intent to commence annexation proceedings for the
Horrigan Farms and Cherry Bloom Annexation providing a
determination on the boundary to be annexed, and whether
simultaneous zoning and the assumption of bonded indebtedness will
be required.
-or-
MOTION B: I move to approve Resolution No. 4518, accepting a
notice of intent to commence annexation proceedings for the
Horrigan Farms and Cherry Bloom Annexation providing a
determination on the boundary to be annexed, which includes a
portion of the right-of-way of Burns Road, and whether simultaneous
zoning and assumption of bonded indebtedness will be required.
9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS
160 - 177 (a) Ordinance No. 4736 - 2025 Ad Valorem Tax (Property Tax) (10
Page 3 of 306
minutes)
Motion A: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4736, providing for zero
percent increase in the regular property taxes of the City for levy in
2024 and collection in the 2025 tax year; preserving levy capacity for
future years; and providing for related matters and, further, authorize
publication by summary only.
-or-
Motion B: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4736, providing for a one
percent increase in the regular property taxes of the City for levy in
2024 and collection in the 2025 tax year; preserving banked levy
capacity for future years; and providing for related matters and,
further, authorize publication by summary only.
-or-
Motion C: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4736, providing for a one
percent increase, plus the banked capacity of four percent in the
regular property taxes of the City for levy in 2024 and collection in the
2025 tax year; and providing for related matters and, further,
authorize publication by summary only.
178 - 182 (b) *Resolution No. 4519 - Segregation of Local Improvement
District No. 150 Assessment (5 minutes)
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4519, relating to Local
Improvement District No.150; providing for the segregation of
assessments for certain parcels, referred to as Asmus Chapel Hill,
consistent with RCW 35.44.410; and, ratifying and confirming prior
acts.
183 - 212 (c) Resolutions Nos. 4520, 4521, & 4522 - Segregation of Local
Improvement District No. 151 Assessment (5 minutes)
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4520, relating to Local
Improvement District No.151; providing for the segregation of
assessments for certain parcels, referred to as Broadmoor, consistent
with RCW 35.44.410; and, ratifying and confirming prior acts.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4521, relating to Local
Improvement District No.151; providing for the segregation of
assessments for certain parcels, referred to as Barker Estates,
consistent with RCW 35.44.410; and, ratifying and confirming prior
acts.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4522, relating to Local
Improvement District No.151; providing for the segregation of
Page 4 of 306
assessments for certain parcels, referred to as Rocky Hills, consistent
with RCW 35.44.410; and, ratifying and confirming prior acts.
10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
213 - 278 (a) Presentation of 2025-2026 Biennial Budget (25 minutes)
Presentation of the City of Pasco 2025-2026 General Fund Biennial
Budget and other funds.
11. NEW BUSINESS
279 - 304 (a) Development Review Process Update Presentation
Presentation - Elizabeth Garvin a consultant with Clarion Associates
will provide an update on the development review changes process.
12. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION
13. EXECUTIVE SESSION
(a) Discussion with Legal Counsel About Current or Potential
Litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) (30 minutes)
14. ADJOURNMENT
15. ADDITIONAL NOTES
(a) (RC) Roll Call Vote Required
* Item not previously discussed
Q Quasi-Judicial Matter
MF# “Master File #....”
305 - 306 (b) Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only)
(c) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the
City Clerk for assistance.
Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por
favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para
garantizar la disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter
service may be provided upon request. Please provide two
business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.)
Page 5 of 306
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 30, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Debra Barham, City Clerk
City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Meeting Minutes for October 21st and October 28th
I. REFERENCE(S):
10.21.2024 and 10.28.2024 Draft Council Minutes
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting and
Regular 2024 28, October and 2024 on October held Workshop 21,
respectively.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 6 of 306
MINUTES
City Council Regular Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, October 21, 2024
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Pete Serrano, Mayor.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Pete Serrano, David Milne, Blanche Barajas, Melissa
Blasdel, Charles Grimm, Peter Harpster, and Leo Perales
Councilmembers attending remotely: None
Councilmembers absent: None
Staff present: Adam Lincoln, City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager;
Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager; Darcy Buckley, Brent Cook, Deputy
Police Chief; Finance Director; Kevin Crowley, Fire Chief; Eric Ferguson, City
Attorney; Jacob Gonzalez, Land Use & Planning Advisor; Craig Raymond,
Community & Economic Development Deputy Director; Arman Rashid, IT
Director; Jesse Rice, Parks & Recreation Director; Maria Serra, Public Works
Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Meeting Minutes for October 7th and October 15th
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting and Regular
Workshop held on October 7, 2024 and October 15, 2024 respectively.
Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of
$7,356,708.26 and Write-off Totaling $28,005.75 (delinquent bad debt)
To approve claims in the total amount of $7,356,708.26 ($5,165,325.57 in Check
Nos. 267208 - 267517; $904,966.63 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 848089 - 848126,
Page 1 of 8Page 7 of 306
848128 - 848153; $5,822.13 in Check Nos. 54838 - 54840; $1,280,593.93 in
Electronic Transfer Nos. 30215006 - 30215690).
To approve bad debt write-off for accounts receivable including Utility Billing,
Ambulance, Cemetery, General Accounts, and Miscellaneous Accounts in the
total amount of $28,005.75 and, of that amount, authorize $28,005.75 to be
turned over for collection.
Approve Tri-City Regional Hotel/Motel Commission 2025 Marketing Plan &
Budget
To approve the Tri-City Regional Hotel-Motel Commission (TCRHMC) 2025
Marking Plan and Operating Budget of $2,200,000, with City of Pasco's share of
$568,000.
Ordinance No. 4735 - Amending PMC Sections 10.31.010 and 10.31.020
Related to Automated Traffic Cameras
To adopt Ordinance No. 4735, amending the Pasco Municipal Code Sections
10.31.010 Authorized Use of Automated Traffic Safety Cameras and 10.31.020
Notice of Infraction for Automated Traffic Control System and, further, authorize
publication by summary only.
Resolution No. 4509 - First Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement with
Department of Corrections for Office Space and Support Services for
Community Corrections Officers
To approve Resolution No. 4509, authorizing the City Manager to execute the
interlocal agreement with Department of Corrections for Office Space and Support
Services for Community Corrections Officers.
Resolution No. 4510 - Interagency Agreement Washington State Internet
Crimes Against Children Task Force
To approve Resolution No. 4510, authorizing the City Manager to execute an
Interagency Agreement between the Washington State Internet Crimes Against
Children Task Force acting through the City of Seattle Police Department and the
Pasco Police Department.
Resolution No. 4511 - Interagency Agreement with the Washington Traffic
Safety Commission for Traffic Safety Emphasis Patrols
To approve Resolution No.4511, authorizing the City Manager to execute the
interagency agreement between the Washington Traffic Safety Commission and
the City of Pasco for traffic safety emphasis patrols.
Page 2 of 8Page 8 of 306
ROLL CALL VOTE
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Barajas
to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember
Grimm, Councilmember Harpster, and Councilmember
Perales
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Robert Hoffman, Pasco, WA, commented on code enforcement, rental
inspections and asked for clarification on the requirements for windows of his
rental properties.
Dallas Green, Pasco, WA, commented on the Court Street and Sacajawea Trail
speeding issue that was discussed at the last Council Workshop.
Kirk Watts, Franklin County, commented about safety along Court Street due to
vehicles speeding along the street. He expressed appreciation to Councilmember
Grimm and Mayor Pro Tem Milne for their efforts.
Deb Huntington, Pasco, WA, commented on the Court Street and Sacajawea Trail
speeding issue.
Mr. Lincoln stated that when the Court Street and Sacajawea Trail topic comes
back before Council, staff will provide why and what qualifies a roadway to
become an arterial road.
Mary Mahoney, Pasco resident, commented the following topics: a 2022 Council
meeting, an LID near her home, the Tri Cities Animal Control Authority (TCACA),
the proposed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), WSU related to testing on animals
and Pasco Public Facilities District Aquatic Facility project.
REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS
Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
Mr. Grimm reported on the Benton Franklin Council of Governments (BFCOG)
Board, Good Roads & Transportation Association, and Franklin County
Emergency Management meetings he recently attended. He expressed
appreciation to Ms. Serra for her efforts to obtain funding for Public Works
projects, as well as two (2) wastewater projects that were nationally recognized.
Page 3 of 8Page 9 of 306
Mayor Serrano also expressed appreciation to Ms. Serra for the same reasons.
Ms. Blasdell reported on the Fire Department Station No. 84 firefighters promotion
ceremony she recently attended.
Mr. Perales reported on the Places Conference hosted by the Washington Trust
for Historic Preservation and Washington State 911 Advisory Committee he
recently attended.
Mayor Pro Tem Milne reported on the Boys & Girls Clubs' Dinner with Friends
event, the COPA Economic Development meeting, and the Serving our Heroes
event hosted by Amazon.
Mr. Harpster reported on the Pasco Parks & Recreation Community Fun Run
event.
Ms. Barajas reported on the donation $43K from Gary Sinise Foundation and
Amazon given to Franklin County District No. 3 for a Fire Safety House & a
Ladder Truck Slide Inflatable, along with a trailer to transport these valuable
resources to various events.
HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
RELATING THERETO
Public Hearing for 2025 Ad Valorem Tax (Property Tax) and General Fund
Revenue
Ms. Buckley provided a brief report on the options available to Council when
setting the 2025 Ad Valorem (property) Tax amount, as well as the proposed
General Fund revenue.
Council asked for clarification regarding the Ad Valorem and revenues for the
General Fund in which Ms. Buckley and Mr. Lincoln provided responses.
Mayor Serrano declared the Public Hearing open to consider the proposed 2025 Ad
Valorem Tax and General Fund Revenue.
Following three calls for comments, and there being none, Mayor Serrano declared the
Public Hearing closed.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS
Resolution No. 4512 - Setting a Date to Consider a Notice of Intent to
Commence Annexation Proceedings for Horrigan Farms and Cherry Bloom
Annexation (ANX 2024-005)
Mr. Raymond provided a brief report on the request to annex property into the
City of Pasco from Horrigan Farms and Cherry Bloom.
Page 4 of 8Page 10 of 306
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel
to approve Resolution No. 4512, setting 7:00 PM, November 4, 2024, as the
time and date for a public meeting with the initiators to consider the Horrigan
Farms and Cherry Bloom Notice of Intent to commence annexation of Short
Plat 2021-08 Lot 2, and Short Plat 2022-32 Lots 1 and 2, property located
South of Burns Road and east of Shoreline Drive in Section 12, Township 9N,
Range 28 E.W.M.
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES: Mayor Serrano, Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember
Barajas, Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember
Grimm, Councilmember Harpster, and Councilmember
Perales
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Presentation of 2025-2026 Biennial Budget
Mr. Lincoln introduced the next presentations for the City Council, City Manager's
Office, Information Technology, and Finance Departments and Non-Departmental
Budgets.
Ms. Pashon provided a presentation for the City Council and City Manager's
Office proposed budgets.
Council and Ms. Pashon briefly discussed the proposed City Manager's Office
budget.
Mr. Rashid provided a presentation for the IT Department proposed budget.
Ms. Buckley provided a presentation for the Finance Department and Non-
Departmental proposed budgets.
Mr. Grimm expressed appreciation for the efforts from staff to review expenses
and propose reductions.
Mr. Milne asked about the reduction of COPA funding and both, Mr. Lincoln and
Ms. Pashon stated that the COPA funding request was being reviewed that the
Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) at this time and therefore was removed
from the Non-Departmental proposed budget.
RECESS
Mayor Serrano called for a five minute recess at 9:00 PM.
NEW BUSINESS
Page 5 of 8Page 11 of 306
Presentation Downtown Masterplan Implementation Update
Ms. Sigdel introduced Jeff Arango, Managing Principal with Framework
Consulting, who provided a progress report related to the Downtown Pasco
Master Plan (Master Plan) and presented the plans for the additional
implementation of the Master Plan.
Mayor Serrano and Mr. Perales expressed appreciation for the presentation.
Mr. Perales asked if the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding
available for the downtown lighting and Ms. Sigdel confirmed that CDBG funding
is an option.
Irrigation Utility Revenue Requirements & Connection Charges
Ms. Sigdel introduced Brooke Taci with FCS Group
Ms. Serra provided an brief background on the City's irrigation system. She also
discussed the current status of the system and needs for repairs and expansion of
the irrigation system.
Ms. Taci provided a presentation on the recent process undertaken to calculate
revenue requirements and connection charges. These are based on assumptions
consistent with utility need projections and prudent fiscal policies. She stated that
staff is looking for Council's direction on the establishment of connection fees and
increase in monthly fees.
Council, Ms. Taci and Mr. Ferguson continued discussion about the irrigation
utility and fee structure.
Council concurred and directed staff to reach the City's stakeholders and
developers to explore establishing a connection charge for new connections.
MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION
Mayor Pro Tem Milne asked Council to support a speed limit reduction along
Court Street.
Mr. Ferguson stated, per the Council's Rule of Procedure, that since this item was
not listed in the agenda, that a motion to bring it forward for discussion must be
made first.
ROLL CALL VOTE
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Perales
to add the topic of speed reduction along Court Street to the agenda for
discussion.
Page 6 of 8Page 12 of 306
RESULT: Motion carried 6-1
AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Barajas,
Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember Grimm,
Councilmember Harpster, and Councilmember Perales
NAYS: Mayor Serrano
Mr. Grimm expressed support for speed reduction.
Mr. Ferguson explained that before an ordinance to reduce the speed limit on a
roadway, either a traffic study needs to be conducted or City-wide procedures
related to speed limits need to be implemented, then final action may be taken.
Council and staff continued discussion regarding speed limit reduction along
Court Street and throughout the City.
ROLL CALL VOTE
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Milne moved, seconded by Councilmember Grimm
to direct staff to draft an ordinance to change the speed limit on West Court
Street between Road 100 and Harris to 25 MPH in order to enhance traffic
safety in the area.
RESULT: DEFEATED. 3-4
AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Grimm, and
Councilmember Perales
NAYS: Mayor Serrano, Councilmember Barajas, Councilmember
Blasdel, and Councilmember Harpster
ROLL CALL VOTE
MOTION: Councilmember Harpster moved, seconded by Councilmember
Blasdel to direct staff to work with Kerr Ferguson Law to develop a procedure
regarding establishing a maximum speed limit in accordance with RWC
46.61.415.
RESULT: Motion carried 6-1
AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Milne, Councilmember Barajas,
Councilmember Blasdel, Councilmember Grimm,
Councilmember Harpster, and Councilmember Perales
NAYS: Mayor Serrano
Mayor Pro Tem Milne asked for Council concurrence to add radar speed limit
signs along West Court Street in the meantime.
Council discussed adding radar speed limit signs and the majority of Council
Page 7 of 8Page 13 of 306
agreed to wait to add radar signs at this time.
RECESS
Mayor Serrano called a three-minute recess at 10: 28 PM.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Council adjourned into Executive Session at 10:31 PM for 20 minutes returning at
10:51 PM for discussion with legal counsel about current or potential litigation per
RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) with the City Manager, Deputy City Manager, and City
Attorney.
Mr. Harpster recused himself from the first portion of the Executive Session.
At 10:49 PM Mayor Serrano announced that the Executive Session would
continue for another 20 minutes or until 11:10 PM.
Mr. Harpster attended the Executive Session at 10:49 PM.
City Manger Lincoln and Deputy City Manager Sigdel left the Executive Session
at 11:00 PM.
Mayor Serrano called the meeting back to order at 11:10 PM.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:10 PM.
PASSED and APPROVED on _______________________.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Pete Serrano, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 8 of 8Page 14 of 306
MINUTES
City Council Workshop Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, October 28, 2024
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & Microsoft Teams Webinar
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Pete Serrano, Mayor.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Pete Serrano, David Milne, Blanche Barajas, Melissa
Blasdel, Charles Grimm, Peter Harpster, and Leo Perales
Councilmembers attending remotely: None
Councilmembers absent: None
Staff present: Adam Lincoln, City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager;
Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager; Darcy Buckley, Finance Director; Eric
Ferguson, City Attorney; Jacob Gonzalez, Land Use & Planning Advisor; Sara
Matzen, Human Resources Director, Jesse Rice, Parks & Recreation Director;
Ken Roske, Police Chief; Maria Serra, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham,
City Clerk
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
Mayor Pro Tem Milne reported on Benton Franklin Counties Domestic Memorial
event he recently attended.
Mr. Harpster reported on the Grace Collective's (formally known as Grace
Kitchen) Gala and Fundraiser event he recently attended.
Ms. Blasdel reported on the HAPO Advisory Board meeting and Visit Tri-Cities
Board meetings she recently attended.
Mr. Perales reported on two local football games he attended over the weekend.
Page 1 of 5Page 15 of 306
Mayor Serrano reported on the Hanford Economic Investment Fund Advisory
Committee meeting he attended earlier in the day.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Amending PMC Title 25 Zoning Related to Overnight Truck Habitation
Ms. Sigdel provided a brief report related to overnight truck parking and habitation
with possible amendments to the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Title 25 Zoning.
Council, Ms. Sigdel, Mr. Gonzalez and Mr. Lincoln discussed the following related
to the proposed PMC amendments:
Council requested a map that identifies the C-1 zoning in the City;
Number of trucks per receptible (trash container)
Purpose of the 1,000-foot buffer from Resident and Mixed-Use, School and
Parks;
List of other cities that have overnight truck parking and habitation;
Possibility of removing the special permit provision;
Questioned 72 to 96 hour stay;
24-hour supervision requirement.
A majority of Council was supportive of amending the PMC to included overnight
truck parking & habitation. They discussed lowering the 1,000-foot buffer, possibly
to 500 feet and remove the requirement for paving the site.
Mayor Serrano called for public comments.
Steve Bauman, applicant, provided an update to the original application as his
client withdrew from the project. He noted that there may be a new client for this
project. He described the ideal facility for overnight truck parking.
Council and Mr. Bauman continued discussing the proposal.
During the discussion, it was confirmed that this would be the first site in a
municipality in Washington State. The Washington State Department of
Transportation is currently working on a similar effort.
The majority of Council concurred:
No special permit was necessary;
Requested that the term "Truck" be clearly defined so not to allow personal
truck parking;
Limit the amount of time allowed to stay to 24 hours and possibility up to 72
hours;
Reduce the buffer to 250 or 500 feet depending on the surrounding area.
Mr. Scheline spoke regarding the proposed truck parking and overnight stay
Page 2 of 5Page 16 of 306
facility.
Traffic Impact Fee Study
Ms. Sigdel provided an update on the Traffic Impact Fee Study and included the
status of the study, as well as the purpose of the study.
Council and staff discussion continued. The study is long overdue and the hope is
that the fees are fair to the developers and accomplishes the City's goals and
have a service model that is comparable with neighboring jurisdictions. The study
should occur every four to five years to ensure that the fees and the service
model provides predictability to the developers.
Mayor Serrano called for public comments.
Steve Bauman, local developer, recommended that only one fee be assessed,
either a development impact fee or a mitigation fee and not both.
Presentation of 2025-2026 Biennial Budget
Mr. Lincoln introduced the 2025-2026 General Fund Biennial Budget presentation
for Animal Control, Human Resources, Municipal Court, Library and Financing,
followed by a review of Real Estate Excise Tax Fund and streets related funds.
The streets funds included City Streets, Arterial Streets, I-182 Corridor Impact,
and Street Overlay.
Mr. Rice first introduced Animal Shelter Manager Ben Zigan and community
outreach dog Dee Dee. Then he provided a brief overview of the Animal Control
proposed budget.
Council and staff continued discussing the animal control budget and asked for
the medical costs for dogs and cats. Council may place a limit on those costs.
Council also for an update on creating an Advisory Committee that would include
Council representation in 2025.
Ms. Matzen provided a brief overview of the Human Resources Department
budget.
Council asked for clarification on a few aspects of the budget.
Mr. Lincoln introduced Municipal Court Judge Stilwill and Municipal Court
Administrator Liz Porras who were in the audience. Mr. Lincoln provided a brief
overview the Municipal Court proposed budget.
Ms. Buckley provided a brief overview of the Library and Financing budgets. the
Financing budget reflects transfer to other funds for construction projects,
subsidies to other funds such as ambulance MKL Center or the Senior Center and
Debt Services payments.
Page 3 of 5Page 17 of 306
RECESS
Mayor Serrano called for a five-minute recess at 8:44 PM.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
CONTINUED
Presentation of 2025-2026 Biennial Budget Continued
Ms. Buckley provided a brief overview of the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET)
Fund and streets related funds. The streets funds included City Streets, Arterial
Streets, I-182 Corridor Impact, and Street Overlay.
Mayor Serrano called for public comments three (3) times and no one came
forward to speak.
Resolution - Acceptance of Work of A Street Phase 1.5 Project
Mr. Rice provided a brief report related to the completion of the A Street Phase
1.5 project.
Mayor Serrano called for public comments three (3) times and no one came
forward to speak.
Resolution - Professional Services Agreement Amendment No. 2 with
Jacobs for Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Improvements
Ms. Serra provided a brief report on the proposed amendment for the
Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for the Butterfield Water Treatment Plant
Improvements project.
Mayor Serrano called for public comments three (3) times and no one came
forward to speak.
Resolution - West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Phase 3 and 4 Drinking
Water State Revolving Fund Loan Acceptance
Ms. Serra provided a brief report to accept a loan from the Drinking Water State
Revolving Fund for the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Phase Nos. 3 and 4.
Mayor Serrano called for public comments three (3) times and no one came
forward to speak.
Resolution - Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Drinking Water State
Revolving Fund Loan Application Approval
Ms. Serra provided a brief report requesting approval to apply for a Drinking
Water State Revolving Fund Loan for the Butterfield Water Treatment Plant.
Page 4 of 5Page 18 of 306
Mayor Serrano called for public comments three (3) times and no one came
forward to speak.
Resolution - Change Order No. 6 for the East Urban Growth Area Expansion
Sewer Local Improvement District No.152 Phase 4 Project
Ms. Serra provided a brief report on the proposed Change Order No. 6 for the
East Urban Growth Area (UGA) Expansion Sewer Local Improvement District
(LID) No. 152 Phase 4 project.
Mayor Serrano called for public comments three (3) times and no one came
forward to speak.
MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION
Mr. Rice announced the Spooky Hall annual event is scheduled for Thursday,
October 31st from 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM.
Mr. Grimm expressed appreciation for the opportunity of public comment during
the Council Workshops.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:18 PM.
PASSED and APPROVED on _______________________.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Pete Serrano, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 5 of 5Page 19 of 306
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 1, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Darcy Buckley, Finance Director
Finance
SUBJECT: Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of
$5,711,724.84
I. REFERENCE(S):
Accounts Payable 10.17.24 to 10.30.24
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve claims in the total amount of $5,711,724.84 ($2,947,929.19 in
Check Nos. 267518 - 267784; $1,514,680.75 in Electronic Transfer Nos.
848047 - 848086, 848154 - 848299, 848301 - 848370; $1,878.57 in Check
Nos. 54841 - 54842; $1,247,236.33 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30215691 -
30216354).
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 20 of 306
REPORTING PERIOD:
November 4, 2024
Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'l Bank Electronic Bank Combined
Check Numbers 267518 - 267784 54841 - 54842
Total Check Amount $2,947,929.19 $1,878.57 Total Checks 2,949,807.76$
Electronic Transfer Numbers 848047 - 848086 30215691 - 30216354
848154 - 848299
848301 - 848370
Total EFT Amount $1,514,680.75 $1,247,236.33 $0.00 $0.00 Total EFTs 2,761,917.08$
Grand Total 5,711,724.84$
Councilmember B
100 504,332.14
110 156,670.11
140 82,844.63
145 1,393.93
150 51,779.78
160 16,373.94
165 1,413.54
168 38,348.19
170 1,789.32
180 1,646.86
185 1,762.87
190 108.00
194 21,074.54
195 240.23
196 HOTEL/ MOTEL EXCISE TAX 1,558.50
367 1,345,689.20
410 633,935.08
510 73,265.23
511 10,732.56
515 (623.10)
520 93,608.46
690 2,673,780.83
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS:5,711,724.84$
PAYROLL CLEARING
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING BUSINESS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL
MEDICAL/ DENTAL/ VISION INSURANCE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STADIUM/ CONVENTION CENTER
GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
UTILITY, WATER/ SEWER
RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN
REVOLVING ABATEMENT
CEMETERY
ATHLETIC PROGRAMS
ANIMAL CONTROL
SENIOR CENTER OPERATING
MULTI-MODAL FACILITY
C.D. BLOCK GRANT
MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER
AMBULANCE SERVICE
Councilmember A
SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND:
GENERAL FUND
STREET
City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington
We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed
as described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such
Adam Lincoln, City Manager Griselda Garcia, Finance Manager
We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this
4th day of November, 2024 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment:
October 17 to October 30, 2024
C I T Y O F P A S C O
Council Meeting of:
Accounts Payable Approved
The City Council
Page 21 of 306
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 31, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Jesse Rice, Director
Parks & Recreation
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4513 - Acceptance of Work for A Street Phase 1.5
Project
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Resolution
Resolution No. 4326
Ordinance No. 4708
Resolution No. 4430
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Motion: I move to approve Resolution No. 4513, accepting work performed by
Musco Sports Lighting, LLC., under contract for the A Street Sports Complex
Phase 1.5 Project.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Contracted Amount: $401,563.31
In-Kind Grant Reduction: ($100,000)
Remaining Contract After Grant: $301,563.31
Permits & Fees: $3,974.69
Final Cost to City: $305,538 (Paid by Park Development Fund's Community
Park District)
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
In Mid-December 2022, the National Recreation & Park Association (NRPA)
issued a call for applications for the Musco Sporting Lights/NRPA
(Musco/NRPA) Youth Sports Equity Grant Program. The City of Pasco (City)
applied for and was selected to receive a $100,000 in-kind grant toward the
installation of sports lighting. Council accepted the award through Resolution
No. 4326 in early 2023.
Page 22 of 306
In March 2024, Council approved Resolution No. 4430 authorizing the
purchase & installation of the sports lighting by MUSCO through the KCDA
Purchasing Cooperative of which the City is a member. At that time, Council
also approved Ordinance No. 4708, which approved the budget adjustment,
authorizing the use of the Park Development Fund Community Park District
dollars to pay for the project.
In July 2024, the contractor arrived on site and completed the installation of the
sports field lighting. The fields are scheduled to open to the public in spring of
2025 when the grass if fully established.
V. DISCUSSION:
This item was presented to Council at the Workshop Meeting on October 28,
2024.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed Resolution accepting the work
performed by Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. for the A Street Sports Complex
Phase 1.5 Project.
Page 23 of 306
Resolution – Musco Sports Lighting Project Acceptance- 1
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING, LLC,
UNDER CONTRACT FOR THE A STREET PHASE 1.5 PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the work performed by MUSCO Sports Lighting, LLC., under contract for
Project No. 24 599 has been examined by City of Pasco (City) Staff and been found to be in
apparent compliance with the applicable project specifications and drawings; and
WHEREAS, it is City Staff’s recommendation that the City of Pasco formally accept the
contractor's work and the project as complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council concurs with City Staff’s recommendation and thereby accepts the
work performed by MUSCO Sports Lighting, LLC., under contract for Project No. 24 599 as being
completed in apparent compliance with the project specifications and drawings.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington
State Department of Revenue of this acceptance.
Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld, pursuant to
RCW 60.28.011, regulations and administrative process, shall be released upon apparent
compliance with and satisfaction of applicable project specifications and verification thereof by
Department staff and Finance Director.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 24 of 306
RESOLUTION NO.4326
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO,WASHINGTON,
APPROVING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE MUSCO SPORTS
LIGHTING/NATIONAL RECREATION &PARK ASSOCIATION YOUTH
SPORTS EQUITYGRANT,MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING,AND
IN-KIND DONATION;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZE THE INTERIM CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE GRANT
WHEREAS,the City of Pasco (City)applied for a Sports Equity Grant from Musco Sports
Lighting/National Recreation &Park Association (Musco/NRPA);and
WHEREAS,the City would like to accept a Musco/NRPA Youth Sports Equity Grant and
associated NRPA Memorandum of Understanding and Musco In-Kind Donation;and
WHEREAS,as stated in the updated Parks Recreation and Open Space Master Plan,the
City has a goal to provide,”a comprehensive,equitable and accessible system ofparks and
recreation programs ”;and
WHEREAS,the Musco/NRPA Youth Sports Equity Grant will allow the City to conduct
an equity assessment of its current youth sports partnerships and offerings,as well as provide a
signi?cant in-kind donation toward the installation of needed outdoor LED sports ?eld lighting;
and
WHEREAS,the City has been chosen to receive the Youth Sports Equity Grant in the
amount of $20,000.00 from NRPA,with an additional in-kind donation,up to $100,000.00,from
Musco Sports Lighting toward the installation of outdoor LED ?eld sports lighting;and
WHEREAS,the City will provide matching funds for the sports lighting installation of up
to $200,000.00.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO,WASHINGTON:
That the City Council does hereby accept the Musco Sports Lighting/National Recreation
&Park Association (Musco/NRPA)Youth Sports Equity Grant;and
Be It Further Resolved,that the City agrees to the Musco/NRPA Youth Sports Equity
Grant Memorandum of Understanding and Musco Sports Lighting In-Kind Donation Award Letter
attached hereto as Exhibits A and B;and
Be It Further Resolved,that the Interim City Manager,or his designee,is hereby
authorized to execute,sign and take all necessary steps to accept the Musco/NRPA Youth Sports
Equity Grant.
Resolution —Musco/NRPA Grant -1
Page 25 of 306
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco,Washington,on this 20thday of March,
2023.
Blanche Baraj as
Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Degra
Barham,CMC
City Clerk
Resolution —Musco/NRPA Grant -2
Page 26 of 306
NRPA
9/
NATIONAL
RECREATION AND PARK
ASSOCIATION
MEMORANDUMOF UNDERSTANDING
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU),dated February 14,2023 (Effective Date),is made between the
National Recreation and Park Association,a New York not-for-profit corporation and Section 501(c)(3)
organization located at 22377 Belmont Ridge Road,Ashburn,Virginia,20148 ("NRPA")and the Pasco Parks and
Recreation Department,a provider of park,recreation,or community services in Pasco,WA (”Grantee").
1.Purpose
The purpose of this MOU is to confirm approval of the terms governing the acceptance and use of twenty
thousand dollars ($20,000)(Grant Funds)made available to the Grantee for the implementation of the NRPA
Youth Sports Equity Grant Program ("Project”).
Made possible through the support of Musco Lighting,NRPA is managing the administration of the grant
program ("Program”).Grants made through this Program are intended to support local park and recreation
agencies and community-based organizations as they advance equitable access to youth sports.
Having been selected as a recipient of Grant Funds through this Program,Grantee is required to accept the
terms contained within this MOU in order to receive the Grant Funds and participate in this Program.
2.Project Funding
A.Within thirty (30)days upon execution of this MOU and delivery to NRPA,NRPAwill send Grantee a
check or wire transfer in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000).
B.Grantee willwork with NRPAto finalize project budget by March 15,2023.NRPAmust be noti?ed of any
changes made to the project budget if they are greater than 10%of the project costs.
C.Grant Funds will be distributed by NRPA.
D.No matching funds are required.
3.Grantee Requirements
Grantee will use the Grant Funds to:
A.Advance equitable access to youth sports through the activities identi?ed in the original grant proposal:
a.Hire a consultant to conduct an equity assessment of youth sports practices,programs,and
operations to identify opportunities to better center equity.
b.Changes to these activities must be provided to NRPA in writing for approval.
Participate in project interviews in April 2023 to discuss progress related to the activities listed above.
Participate in the learning community and all learning community activities (format TBD by cohort).
Collaborate with NRPAto assess the impact of the implemented strategy (or strategies).Methods of
assessment could include sharing program metrics,surveys,focus groups and/orinterviews with local
park and recreation professionals,youth,parents,coaches,and/orother local stakeholders.
a.Agencies will also participate in an annual focus group.
E.’Share stories,photos,videos,and written content with NRPA to promote project impacts.
If selected,host a site visit for NRPAduring the project period.
G.Projects must be complete by October 1,2023.-
a.Final reports are due to NRPA on this date.
PD!”3"
Page 27 of 306
,.
NRPA
.1
NATIONAL
RECREATION AND PARK
ASSOCIATION
4.Promotion
NRPA and Musco Lighting may use Grantee and/orpark names,photos,and/orinformation in connection with
the Project for promotional or other purposes associated with the Project,in any and all media,without
limitation and without further payment,noti?cation,or permission,except where prohibited by law.Ifthe
Grantee's photo release form does not cover promotional and other uses,NRPAcan provide one upon request.
NRPAalso grants the Pasco Parks and Recreation Department a limited,non-exclusive,and royalty-free license
to use NRPA’sname,trademark,logos,and other identifying marks ("Licensed Marks")for promotional or other
purposes associated with the Project,unless prohibited by law.NRPAshall have the right to review and approve
the use of the Licensed Marks,as well as any and all related promotional and advertising material,in order to
ensure that the use of the Licensed Marks meets NRPA’squality assurance standards.
Grantee shall also provide NRPAan opportunity to review and approve any statement or message related to the
Grant Funds or Project in advance of release to the public.Any promotion,public announcement,or promotion
relating to the Grant Funds or Project shall be subject to the prior review of NRPAand Musco Lighting.
AllParties shall retain all title,ownership,rights,and intellectual property rights in their own respective marks,
logos,content,materials,tools and intellectual property.Under no circumstance will any Party to this MOU use
another Party’s LicensedMarks in a false,misleading,or disparaging manner.Upon completion of the Project,
Parties shall,at their own expense,return all copies Licensed Marks to their respective owners beyond what is
necessary for record-keeping purposes.
5.Limits of Liability
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law,Grantee hereby releases NRPAand Musco Lighting,and each
of their directors,officers,managers,members,employees,agents,attorneys,advisors,consultants,volunteers
and other like parties (collectively the "Support Parties”),from any liability whatsoever relating to or arising out
of the Project or the use of the Grant Funds.Grantee further waives any right to sue or bring any action of any
kind against the Support Parties relating to or arising out of the Project or the use of the Grant Funds.This
limitation of liabilityshall apply whether the Support Parties'liability arises due to breach of contract,breach of
warranty,or as a result of tortious conduct,including,but not limitedto,negligence (of any kind),strict liability,
statutory liability,or any other causes of action.
NRPA’sliability,if any,arising out of or in any way related to the relationship and/ordealings between NRPAand
Grantee,shall be limited to the payment amounts paid pursuant to this MOU.NRPA shall not be liable for any
damages caused by or arising out of the acts or omissions of a third party.
6.Indemni?cation
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law,Grantee shall indemnify,defend and hold harmless the
Support Parties from any and all causes of action,suits,settlements,judgments,liens,indebtedness,damages,
losses,costs,expenses,fees (including attorney’s fees and costs),penalties,claims,claims for relief,liabilities
and demands of every kind,nature,and character (collectively,”Claims")relating to or arising out of:(i)
Grantee’s involvement in the development,planning,demolition,construction,installation,implementation,
maintenance,repair and/ormanagement of the Project;(ii)any failure by Grantee to comply with any applicable
laws,rules and/orregulations (including,without limitation,building,safety and fire codes,etc.);(iii)Grantee’s
negligence,misconduct,or malfeasance of Grantees or their agents or representatives;or (iv)any breach by
Page 28 of 306
,2.
NRPA
O”
,NATIONAL
nscnsmou AND PARK
ASSOCIATION
Grantee of any agreement involving the Project or the use of the Grant Funds.In no event shall the Support
Parties be liable for any punitive,exemplary,special,incidental,indirect or consequential damages of any kind
(including,but not limited to loss of profits,loss of reputation and/orloss of current or prospective business
advantage,even where such losses are characterized as direct damages)arising out of or in any way related to
the relationship and/ordealings between the parties,regardless of whether the claim under which damages are
sought is based upon contract,tort,negligence (of any kind),strict liability or otherwise,and regardless of
whether the parties have been advised of the possibility of such damages at the time of contracting or
othenrvise.
7.Con?dentiality
During the term of this MOU,the Parties may learn certain Confidential Information of each other.For purposes
of this MOU,Con?dential Information means the confidentialand proprietary information,not generally known
by non-party personnel,used by the disclosing party and which is proprietary to the disclosing party,and
includes,without limitation,the disclosing party's trade secret or proprietary personnel,financial,marketing and
business information,including strategic,operations and other business plans or forecasts,and Con?dential
Information provided by the disclosing party regarding its employees,customers,vendors,sponsors and other
contractors.The receiving party shall:(i)protect and safeguard the confidentiality of the disclosing party’s
Con?dential information with at least the same degree of care as the receiving party would protect its own
Con?dential information,but in no event with less than a commercially reasonable degree of care;(ii)not use
the disclosing party’s Confidential Information,or permit it to be accessed or used,for any purpose other than
to exercise its rights or perform its obligations under this MOU;and (iii)not discloseany such Con?dential
Information to any person,except to the receiving party’s officers,employees,consultants,accountants,and
legal advisors who are bound by written con?dentiality obligations and have a need to know the Confidential
Informationto assist the receiving party,or act on its behalf,to exercise its rights or perform its obligations
under this MOU.
8.Term
This MOU shall be effective as of the Effective Date hereof and shall continue until October 31,2023 (the
”Term")in accordancewith Section 11.
9.Use of Grant Funds
The Grantee shall use the full amount of the Grant Funds exclusively for the purposes set forth in Section 1.
Unless othewvise agreed in writing by the Grantor,the Grantee shall return any portion of the Grant Fundsand
the income earned thereon that is not expended for such purposes in accordance with Section 11.
All unspent or uncommitted Grant Funds shall be invested in highly liquid investments (such as an
interest-bearing bank account)with the primary objective being preserving the Grant Funds availability for the
Project.Any interest or other income generated by the Grant Funds must be applied to the purposes
described in the Grant Project.
The Grantee agrees not to use any portion of the grant or any income derived from the grant for the
following:
A.To carry on propaganda or otherwiseattempt to influence legislation within the meaning of
Section 4945(d)(1)of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,as amended (the Code);
Page 29 of 306
,.
NRPA
W
NATIONAL
RECREATION AND PARK
ASSOCMTION
B.To in?uence the outcome of any specific public election or to carry on,directly or indirectly,any voter
registration drive withinthe meaning of Section 4945(d)(2)of the Code;
C.To provide a grant to an individualfor travel,study,or similar purpose within the meaning of
Section 4945(g)of the Code,without prior written approval of Grantor.
D.Payments of salaries,other compensation,or expense reimbursement to employees of the Grantee
within the scope of their employment do not constitute ”grants”for these purposes and are not
subject to these restrictions;
E.Except as expressly may be authorized in the approved Project,to provide a grant to any other
organization without prior written approval of the Grantor;or
F.To promote or engage in the following,but not limited to,acts that would create civil liability,
criminal acts,criminal acts of violence,terrorism,hate crimes,the destruction of any state,or
discrimination on the basis of race,national origin,religion,military and veteran status,disability,sex,
age,or sexual orientation,or support of any entity that engages in these activities.
G.To travel to NRPA’sAnnual Conference or any other conference travel without written approvalfrom
Grantor.
10.Audit
Grantee is expected to keep and maintain detailed books and records relating to the Grant,and the Grant Funds
(including,without limitation,all uses thereof and expenditures therefrom)(collectively,the ”Records")during
the Term and for a period of seven (7)years thereafter (the ”Audit Period").NRPA and its assigns have the right
to audit the Gra ntee's ?nancial records relating to this MOU upon not less than ten (10)business days’advance
written notice to Grantee by NRPAat any time during the Audit Period,at NRPA‘ssole expense,during Grantee's
normal business hours.If as a result of an audit,NRPA determines that Grant Funds were not Spent in
accordance with the purposes of this Grant,the Grantee shall:(1)be required to return any Grant Funds not
substantiated,and (2)reimburse NRPAfor all costs and expenses incurred in connection with such audit.lf NRPA
determines that Grant Fundswere used for fraudulent purposes,the Grantee shall be barred from participation
in any further programs.Grantee shallfurther indemnify,defend,and hold the Support Parties harmless from
any acts or omissions relating to its fraudulent use of the Grant Funds.
11.Termination and Repayment
Any party may terminate this MOU at any time for any reason upon providing the other party thirty (30)
calendar days’written notice.Further,either party may terminate this MOU at any time effective upon receipt
of written notice by the other party of failure to perform.In the event that this MOU is terminated for any
reason,Grantee shall promptly repay to NRPAany portion of the Grant Funds not already spent (subject to and
in accordance with all of the terms and conditions hereof)as of the effective date of such termination.
None of the Parties shall be liable to the other by reason of termination of this MOU for compensation,
reimbursement or damages for any loss of prospective profits on anticipated sales or for expenditures,
investments,leases or other commitments relating to the business or goodwill of any of the parties,
notwithstanding any law to the contrary.No termination of this MOU shall release the obligation to pay any
sums due to the terminating party which accrued prior to such termination.
12.Compliance with Laws.
Grantee will comply in full with all applicable federal,state,and local laws and regulations and rules of
governmental agencies and bodiesrelating to Grantee's acceptance and use ofthe Grant Funds,including those
Page 30 of 306
NRPA
.r/
NATIONAL
RECREATION AND PARK
ASSOCIATION
that govern gifts,donations,contributions,expenditures,and anything else of value that benefit,directly or
indirectly,public of?cials.Grantee agree to notify Grantor immediately:(a)of any conduct on Grantee's part
that may be in violation of any applicable federal,state and local laws and (b)if Grantee receives notice of,or
otherwise becomes aware of,any actual or threatened investigation,action,litigation,or disciplinary or other
proceeding of which Grantee is or may be a subject in connection with the Grant Funds and to the extent
permitted by applicable law,shall provide Grantor with all written notices and communications received by
Grantee relating to or any Such investigation,action,litigation,or disciplinary proceeding.
13.Governing Law,Jurisdiction,Venue and Dispute Resolution
This MOU and the performance thereof shall be governed,interpreted,construed and regulated by the law of
the Commonwealth of Virginia,without reference to or application of principles concerning conflicts of laws of
any jurisdiction.Before commencing any litigation arising out of or relating to the relationship of the parties,
this MOU,or the breach hereof,the parties agree to negotiate in good faith to resolve such dispute within
fifteen (15)business days of notice by the other party of such dispute.Should the parties fail to mutually resolve
their dispute and commence litigation,the parties hereby irrevocably consent to venue before the federal and
state courts situated in the Commonwealth of Virginia and each party hereby irrevocably submits to the
jurisdiction of Such courts.The prevailing party in any action or litigation,including appeals,arising out of or
related to this MOU shall be awarded its reasonable attorney's fees and costs.The Parties agrees that NRPA
would not have an adequate remedy at law and would be irreparably injured if Grantee breaches its covenants
hereunder and NRPA shall be entitled to injunctive relief as a remedy for any breach or threatened breach
hereof without showing or proving any actual damages.
14.No Agency;Relationship of the Parties
Each party and their respective officers,employees,agents,contractors and/orconsultants are independent
contractors and are not,nor shall they hold themselves out to as or claim to be,employees or agents of the
other party or any department,agency or unit thereof;accordingly,neither party shall have any authority to
enter into any agreement on behalf of the other party or othenivise cause the other party to incur any
obligations whatsoever other than as set forth herein.
15.Notices
All notices,requests,demands and other communications required or permitted under this MOU must be in
writing and will be deemed to have been duly given,made and received only (a)when personally delivered,or
(b)on the date speci?ed for delivery when deposited with an overnight courier service such as Federal Express
for delivery to the intended addressee,or (c)when sent via facsimile,only so long as followed by a hard copy
sent in a manner set forth in (a)or (b)above,or (d)when delivered via email,only so long as followed by a hard
copy sent in'a manner set forth in (a)or (b)above,each of the foregoing addressed as set forth below:
If to Grantee,to:
Pasco Parks and Recreation Department 525 N.3rd Ave.PO Box 293
Pasco,WA 99301
Attn:Brent Kubalek
Email:Eubaiekagasmwwagm
If to NRPA,to:
National Recreation and Park Association
Page 31 of 306
,0
NRPA
0’
NATIONAL
RECREATION AND PARK
ASSOCMTION
22377 Belmont Ridge Road
Ashburn,VA 20148
Attn:Teresa Morrissey,Senior Program Manager
Email:tmorrisseanrpaorg
16.Entire Agreement
This MOU supersedes any and all agreements,either oral or written,between the parties hereto with respect to
the subject matter covered herein and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with
respect to the Grant purpose and Project in any manner whatsoever.Each party to this MOU acknowledges that
no representations,inducements,promises,or agreements,orally or othenMise,have been made by any party,
or anyone acting on behalf of any party,which is not embodied herein,and that no other agreement,statement,
or promise not contained in this MOU shall be valid or binding.Any modification of this MOU will be effective
only if it is in writing signed by the parties hereto.Any changes,additions or deletions to this MOU,including
the Project,must be approved in writing by all the parties.This MOU and all amendments may be signed in
counterparts,each of which will constitute one and the same document.Any signature delivered via facsimile
or other electronic means shall be deemed an original signature to this MOU.The section headings contained in
this MOU are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this
MOU.
17.Severability
If any term,covenant,or condition of this MOU or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall,
to any extent,be invalid or unenforceable,the remainder of this MOU,or the application of such term,
covenant,or condition to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or
unenforceable,shall not be affected thereby,and each and every remaining term,covenant,or condition of this
MOU shall be valid and enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Theseparties have caused this MOU to be signed by their duly authorized representatives as of the last date set
forthbelow.
National Recreation and Park Association Pasco Parks and Recreation Department
By:By:
Printed Name:
7
Printed Name:
Title:Title:
Date:Date:
Page 32 of 306
NRPA Grant Funds Allocation—
r‘‘J'Wi‘mlu'v
Total Project Costs
Thiscolumnshould includeNRPA'sgrant
investment but should be greater or equal your project that willbe covered with
to the total and amounts in the NRPA the NRPA gmnt.Thisamount should
allocation column.total exactl $20,000.
in this column,only include the pieces of
Consultantto conduct 3.2 r -—-uity assessment
Staff W8 ‘5 8:.0H
Supplies (for commun outreach and feedback sessions)
IBM"-1'ii'1'E
Indirect Costs @ 10%{maximum indirect is 10%,ifyou have no
indirect costs,-lease remove this line)
—_m_—
_——
_—
TOTAL EXPENSES
Thisshould be greater or equal to $20,000.Thisshould total $20,000.
Page 33 of 306
Corporate:100 lst AveWest -PO Box808 -Oskaloosa,lA52577 -641/673-0411 -800/825—6020-Fax:641/673-4740
Manufacturing:2107 StewartRoad .PO Box260 .Muscatine,lA52761 -563/263-2281 -800/756-1205 -Fax:800/374-6402
Web:www.musco.com-Email:lighting@musco.com
6)
Dear Brent,
Congratulations!Pasco Parks and Recreation Department has been awarded a value-in-kind grant from Musco
Sports Lighting as part of the National Park and Recreation Association's Youth Sports Equity Program.
This grant,valued at $100,000,is for a field lighting project in Pasco and reflects the many hours and resources you
have invested in creating and/orenhancing a space in the local community that will advance equitable access to
youth sports.Your diligent work in this area is helping to positively impact the lives of youth and families in your
community,and we at Musco are proud to assist in this important work.
CLAIMINGYOUR AWARD
We have informed your Musco representative,Tim Butz,that you were awarded a grant for $100,000.This will be
reflected as a discount on both your purchase agreement and your final invoice when purchasing the Musco
materials for your project.
TIMELINE
Our expectation is that your project will be fully complete within one year.Please communicate with your Musco
representative about any changes to your timeline,particularly if you think that your project will be delayed.
If you have any additional questions about your grant,please contact Brittany Clarahan
(brittanyclarahang‘f?musco.com).
Sincerely,
Heidi Tegtmeier
Marketing Operations Manager
Lighting ...We Make It Happen.
Page 34 of 306
DocuSign Envelope ID:DE629604-725A-4840-858F-8A3BCF2DO4OE
ORDINANCE NO.4708
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO,WASHINGTON,
AMENDING THE 2023-2024 BIENNIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET
(ORDINANCE NO.4620),BY PROVIDING SUPPLEMENT THERETO;TO
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION IN THE CITY’S PARK
DEVELOPMENT FUND,COMMUNITY PARK DIVISION.
WHEREAS,on November 28,2022,the Pasco City Council approved Ordinance No.
4620,adopting the 2023—2024 Biennial Capital Projects Budget;and
WHEREAS,the 2023-2024 Capital Projects Budget included the A Street Sports
Complex Phase 1 project which was recently completed in December 2023;and
WHEREAS,on March 20,2023,the City Council approved the acceptance of the Musco
Sports Lighting/National Recreation &Park Association Youth Sports Equity In—KindGrant of
$100,000 toward the installation of LED sports lighting at the A Street Sports Complex main ?eld;
and
WHEREAS,the installation of the ?eld lighting will be known as the A Street Sports
Complex Phase 1.5;and
WHEREAS,the total A Street Sports Complex Phase 1.5 project cost is estimated at
$404,064;and
WHEREAS,the City has identi?ed that the remaining project funds above and beyond
the $100,000 In-kind Musco Grant needed to complete the project can be taken from the Park
Development Fund Community Park District funds;and
WHEREAS,the LED sports lighting together with installation can be purchased through
an approved purchasing cooperative as encouraged by the City’s purchasing policy.
NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON,DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.Pursuant to RCW 35A.34.200(3),the 2023—2024 Biennial Capital Projects
Budget be and the same is hereby amended to provide for the following adjustments to revenues,
transfers in,expenditures,and transfers out by providing authority for any necessary transfer of
money within or between funds indicated,and their subsequent impact to end fund balance,as
follows:
Ordinance 7 2023 i 2024 Capital Projects Budget Amendment —1
Page 35 of 306
DocuSign Envelope ID:DE6296C4-725A-4840-858F-8A3BCF2DO4OE
Fund EXPENDITURE REVENUE
Park Development Fund Community Park
District $304,064.00
General Construction Fund $304,064.00 $304,064.00
Total $608,128.00 $304,064.00
Section 2.That the additions in appropriations and expenditures are hereby declared
to exist in the above funds for the said uses and purposes as shown above,and the proper City
of?cials are hereby authorized and directed to issue warrants and transfer funds in accordance
with the provision of the Ordinance.
Section 3.Except as amended herein,Ordinance No.4620 as previously adopted
heretofore shall remain unchanged.
Section 4.Severability.If any section,subsection,sentence,clause,phrase or word
of this Ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction,such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section,subsection,sentence,clause phrase or word of this
Ordinance.
Section 5.Corrections.Upon approval by the city attorney,the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this Ordinance,including scrivener’s errors
or clerical mistakes;reference to other local,state,or federal laws,rules,or regulations;or
numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 6.Effective Date.This Ordinance,being an exercise of a power speci?cally
delegated to the City legislative body,is not subject to referendum,and shall take full force and
effect ?ve (5)days after approval,passage,and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco,Washington,on this 4th day of
March,2024.
DocuSigned by:
Nb Mm
etSerrarrocor
Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DocuSigned by:DocuSigned by:
Oct/mmeiW/n l?it 17orgasm/c
bm9Ba5flfaah,CMC Ferguson Law,PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Published:March 10,2024
Ordinance ,2023 ,2024 Capital Projects Budget Amendment —2
Page 36 of 306
DocuSign Envelope ID:DE629604-725A-4840-85BF-8A3BCF2DO4OE
RESOLUTION NO.4430
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO,WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PURCHASE
AGREEMENT WITH MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING,LLC FOR THE
PURCHASE AND INSTALATION OF FIELD LIGHTING AT THE A STREET
SPORTS COMPLEX.
WHEREAS,the City of Pasco (City)has recognized the need for additional ?eld lighting
to support the growing number of youth and adult sports participants in Pasco;and
WHEREAS,the City,in March of 2023,was selected as a recipient of the Musco Sports
Lighting/National Recreation &Park Association Youth Sports Equity In-Kind Grant of$100,000;
and
WHEREAS,the City has approved appropriation of Park Development Fund Community
Park District funds to cover the remaining project costs above and beyond the $100,000;and
WHEREAS,the purchase will be made through the KCDA Purchasing Cooperative as
encouraged by the City’s Purchasing Policy Administrative Order to meet competitive bidding
requirements;and
WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Pasco,Washington,has after due
consideration,determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into the Purchase
Agreement with Musco Sports Lighting,LLC.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO,WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco,Washington,approves the terms and conditions
of the Purchase Agreement between the City of Pasco and Musco Sports Lighting,LLC as attached
hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved,that the City Manager of the City of Pasco,Washington,is hereby
authorized,empowered,and directed to execute said Purchase Agreement and any future
associated change orders,not to exceed 10%total project cost,should they arise,on behalf of the
City of Pasco;and to make minor substantive changes as necessary to execute the Agreement.
Be It Further Resolved,that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Resolution —Purchase Agreement for Lighting at A St Sports Complex -l
Page 37 of 306
DocuSign Envelope ID:DE6296C4-725A-4840-858F-8A3BCF2DO4OE
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco,Washington,on this 4thday of March,
2024.
DocuSigned by:
Pd’bSol/mm
B?WO
Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DocuSigned by:DocuSigned by:
Del/m{bat/(WM l 6A0ngusoI/t
bmeBé?rhaqn,CMC DFeiegaasenLaw,PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Resolution —Purchase Agreement for Lighting at A St Sports Complex -2
Page 38 of 306
DocuSign Envelope ID:DE6296C4-725A-4840-85BF-8A3BCF2D04OE
Date:February 2,2023 To:Project:A Street Fields
Brent Kubalek Pasco,WA
Ref:224464
King County Directors Association
Master Project:195250,Contract Number:23—406,Expiration:02/28/2024
Commodity:Sport Court/FieldLighting
Quotation Price —Materials Delivered to Job Site and Installation
KCDAContract Price —30fc ..........................................................................................................$217,391.00
Adder —Installation ......................................................................................................................$148,000.00
Performance and Payment Bond .....................................................................................................$3,354.00
Total Price (Equipment and Installation):.............................................................................$368,745.00
Pricing furnishedis effectivefor 60 days unless otherwise noted and is considered confidential.
Light-Structure System ’M with Total Light Control —TLCfor LED”technology
Guaranteed Lighting Performance
0 Guaranteed light levels
0 Targeted light,optimizing visibility with no glare in the participants typical line-of-sight
System Description —All materials and labor required for installation of approved design is included in the scope of work
0 (4)Pre-cast concrete bases with integrated lightning grounding
(4)70 ft Galvanized steel poles
Factory wired and tested remote electrical component enclosures
Pole length,factory assembled wire harnesses
(4)Factory wired pole top luminaire assemblies
(20)Factory aimed and assembled TLC-LEDluminaries
UL Listed assemblies
Control-Link®Control and Monitoring system with onsite dimming(high/med/Iow/blackout).
Product assurance and warranty program that covers materials and onsite labor,eliminating 100%of your
maintenance costs for 25 years
0 Includes a detailed foundation design,signed,and sealed by a licensed structural engineer,registered in the
State of Washington.Structural code and wind speed =2018 IBC,100 MPH,Exp C.
Scope of Work:Installation Services Provided
The work shall be completed by,a licensed Electrical Contractor,Licensed in the State of Washington,under contract to
Musco Sports Lighting.
The installation includes delivery and unloading of the Musco equipment upon arrival to the job site,installation of pre—cast
concrete foundations and concrete backfill.Assembly and installation of new galvanized steel poles,assembly and
mounting of the luminaire assemblies,electrical enclosures and wiring harnesses on each of the poles.Wiring for the
Lighting System is from the luminaire assemblies down to the remote electrical enclosures at the base of each pole where
they will be terminated on the Musco supplied disconnect breaker.
Install a new meter base and 208V/3PH-200 amp distribution cabinet near the SW corner of the field.Trench from the
service location to each Musco pole location.ln-ground boxes will be installed next to each pole and conduit will be
installed from the service location to each in—ground box and from each in—ground box to each of the Musco poles.Trenches
ITIUSCO.—
2016,2022 Musco Sports Lighting,LLC -1 -M-2167-enUS-10
Page 39 of 306
DocuSign Envelope ID:DE6296C4-725A-4840-85BF-8A3BCF2D040E
will be backfilled and compacted,conductors will be pulled through the new conduits from each pole to each ground box
and from each in ground box to the distribution cabinet,all splicing,and terminations will be completed.
We will trench from the existing transformer to the meter base,install conduit,backfill,and install conductors.The utility
will terminate and energize the system.The lighting system will be commissioned and ready for use.
Ground protection will be placed on hardscape (as needed)to protect these surfaces and to provide access for trucks,
crane,concrete trucks,lift equipment and material handling equipment.
The electrical permit is included.The building permit will be by others.
Payment Terms
Musco’s Credit Department will provide payment terms.
Email or fax a copy of the Purchase Order to Musco Sports Lighting,LLC&KCDA:
Musco Sports Lighting,LLC KCDA
Attn:Musco Contracts Attn:Thomas Kim
Fax:800—374—6402 Email:customerservice@kcda.org
Email:musco.contracts@musco.com
All purchase orders should note the following:KCDApurchase -Contract Number:19-406
Client to submit purchase order directly to KCDA.Parties agree that payment from Client to KCDAis a condition
precedent to payment from KCDAto the Contractor (Musco)and that KCDAwill use such payments from the Client to
pay Contractor (Musco).
Delivery Timing
8 -12 weeks for delivery of materials to the job site from the time of order,submittal approval,and confirmation of order
details including voltage,phase,and pole locations.
Due to the built—incustom light control per luminaire,pole locations need to be confirmed prior to production.Changes to
pole locations after the product is sent to production could result in additional charges.
Notes
Quote is based on:
0 Payment and performance bond included at $9.18/1000
0 Pricing reflects current KCDA pricing.
-Shipment of the entire project to one location in two shipments.The pre-cast foundations will be shipped separate from
the poles,lighting equipment and controls.
0 Structural code and wind speed =2018 IBC,100mph,Exposure C,Importance Factor 1.0.
o Trenching,backfill,conduit and in-ground boxes by others.
0 Reasonable access to poles provided by others.
0 Light Levels and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO,any additional aiming required to meet the specified
requirements shall be done by MUSCO.
0 Confirmation of pole locations prior to production.
Thank you for considering Musco for your lighting needs.Please contact me with any questions or if you need additional
details.
Tim Butz Quote/Scope of Work Approved by:
Musco Sports Lighting,LLC
Phone:503/720-6625 Date Approved:
E-mail:tim.butz@musco.com
C...
ITIUSCO —2016,2022 Musco Sports Lighting LLC M-2167-enUS-10
Page 40 of 306
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 29, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Maria Serra, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4514 - Professional Services Agreement Amendment
No. 2 with Jacobs for Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Improvements
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
Exhibit A - PSA Amendment No. 2
Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION:City the authorizing 4514, No. to approve move I Resolution
Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement
with Jacobs for the Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Improvements Project.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA)
with Plant WTP) Treatment (Butterfield Butterfield Jacobs Water for
Improvements not to exceed $1,173,300.
Summary:
Original PSA $533,300
Amendment No. 1 $60,000
Amendment No. 2 (proposed) $1,173,300
New PSA Total $1,766,600
by through loan low-interest a the provided project this for Funding is
Washington State Department of Health (DOH) Drinking Water State Revolving
Fund of (DWSRF) for preconstruction activities, awarded in the amount
$510,000. Additional funding is provided by a second low-interest loan through
the Public Works Board Preconstruction Program, awarded in the amount of
$1,000,000. Remaining funding is allocated from the Utility Fund (Water Fund
411).
Page 41 of 306
City staff continues to pursue funding opportunities in support of future
construction tasks for this project.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
On January 5, 2024, the City entered into a Professional Services Agreement
(PSA) with Jacobs for the Butterfield WTP electrical system upgrade predesign
services. Overall tasks included the following:
Condition assessment of the existing electrical service and backup
power generator, the intake screens, raw water pump and ancillary
chemical feed systems.
30% preliminary design package for the electrical system upgrades
including a new electrical building and new electrical equipment and
standby power to supply existing and future facilities.
A project definition evaluation to identify treatment process objectives.
Development of a project implementation and phasing approach and
preliminary site plan.
Funding strategy assistance to identify potential funding alternatives to
design and construct the future improvements.
An amendment to the Butterfield WTP Facility Plan issued in 2023 provided
additional recommendations for remediation with respect to cyanotoxins and
aquatic during River Columbia the the present growth (milfoil) plant in
seasonally warmer months. These recommendations led to an alternate
sequence of phased replacement of the Butterfield WTP that prioritizes
meeting new water quality and facility operational challenges caused by
climate change.
As a result, near-term steps for cyanotoxin mitigation in advance of the next
summer chemical water raw of terms considered being are season in
pretreatment. PSA Amendment No. 1 was approved under the Public Works
Director approval authority on September 12, 2024, for the design of a
permanganate dosing system.
Amendment No. 1 scope included completion of construction bid documents
previously initiated by in-house City engineering staff for the installation of a
precast concrete permanganate injection vault located at the 36-inch raw water
inlet piping downstream of the raw water pump station. This work also includes
relocation of the chemical storage and feed pump system and instrumentation,
and installation of pipe tapping saddles, chemical piping, and chemical injection
equipment.
V. DISCUSSION:
Please note that this contract has been scoped in phases to coordinate with
Page 42 of 306
awarded funding. This proposed amendment allows us to use the second low-
interest loan in order to move the project forward.
The proposed Amendment No. 2 scope primarily focuses on design of the
Early Works Reliability Improvements, consisting of upgrades to existing
the during priority high as Project facility the at infrastructure identified
Definition Workshop. Items of work include reliability improvements to the
existing reduce screens. intake river To and equipment electrical the
administrative and mobilization costs, the raw water pump station
improvements are also included under the Early Works package.
Additionally, Amendment No. 2 includes geotechnical investigation and funding
application assistance for pursuit of funding alternatives identified during the
previous phase. Furthermore, during previous work, funds were shifted to
complete time critical items including topographic survey and support of DOH
compliance. This amendment also provides funding to complete the tasks that
had been deferred.
This item was discussed at the October 28, 2024, Council Workshop meeting.
Staff recommends authorizing Amendment No. 2 to the professional services
agreement WTP with Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. for the Butterfield
Improvements.
Page 43 of 306
Resolution – Butterflied WTP Improvement Project Amend 2 to PSA - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JACOBS
ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. FOR THE BUTTERFIELD WATER
TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) and Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (Jacobs) entered
into a Professional Services Agreement on January 5, 2024, to provide Engineering services with
respect to the Butterfield Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Improvements project; and
WHEREAS, the City and Jacobs entered into Amendment No. 1 on September 12, 2024,
to complete additional engineering (design) services for a raw water permanganate chemical
dosing system to supplement current methods of algal cyanotoxin treatment and removal from the
Columbia River water source; and
WHEREAS, the City and Jacobs desire to enter into Amendment No. 2 to the Professional
Services Agreement to provide additional professional engineering services as described in
Exhibit A. These additional services include, but not limited to, early works package design and
permitting services consisting of electrical reliability and raw water intake pump station
improvements, geotechnical and topographic surveys, and future funding application assistance;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into Amendment
No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Jacobs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the
Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Pasco and Jacobs
Engineering Group, Inc., as attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Amendment No. 2 to the Professional
Services Agreement on behalf of the City of Pasco; and to make minor substantive changes as
necessary to execute the Amendment.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 44 of 306
Resolution – Butterflied WTP Improvement Project Amend 2 to PSA - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 45 of 306
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. – Amendment No. 2 to PSA
Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Improvements (Design Services) – Project N0. 21245
Version 05.11.24 Page 1
AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 to
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Improvements – Design Services
PROJECT: 21245
AGREEMENT NO. 23-038
WHEREAS, the City and Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. entered into a Professional
Services Agreement on 1/5/2024 to provide professional engineering services with respect to the
Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Improvements project; and
WHEREAS, the City and Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. entered into an Amendment
No. 1 to provide professional engineering services on 9/12/2024; and
NOW, THEREFORE, this agreement is amended to allow Jacobs Engineering Group,
Inc. to provide additional professional engineering services as described in Attachment 1.
1. Scope of Work:
See Attachment 1.
2. Fee:
The compensation for the work is based on a Time and Materials Basis not to exceed
the amount of $1,173,300.00 for a total authorization amount of $1,766,600.00. See
Attachment 2.
3. Time of performance:
No Change. The services shall be complete for the project on or before 12/31/2027.
DATED THIS DAY______________________________.
[date of execution]
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
Adam R. Lincoln - City Manager Michael Reimbold, PE - Manager of Projects
Page 46 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
1
Scope of Work
Butterfield WTP
Improvements Amendment 2
– Early Works
September 2024
This work is to be performed under the Agreement for Professional Services between City of Pasco,
Washington (hereafter, “City”) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., (hereafter “Consultant”), for the
Butterfield Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Improvements.
This scope of work in Amendment 2 adds:
•Electrical reliability design and permitting services.
•Intake improvements design and permitting services.
•Raw water pump station improvements design and permitting services.
•Geotechnical investigation.
•Funding application assistance.
Amendment 2 also includes reallocation of funds from the original contract (Electrical system upgrades
pre-design) for the following scope:
•Topographic survey by HLA Engineering and Land Surveying.
•Additional DOH permitting support.
•Project report to include all phases of the Butterfield WTP Improvements.
Future phases for design and services during construction for additional facilities and improvements to the
Butterfield WTP may be completed under future contracts. The following facilities are anticipated to be
part of the Butterfield WTP Improvements:
Early Works (electrical reliability, intake screens, and raw water pump station upgrades) services
during construction
Treatment piloting
Design and services during construction:
Electrical system upgrades final design and services during construction
Chemical Building replacement
Ozone facility
Filters
Flocculation basins
Residual handling improvements
Clearwell
EXHIBIT A
Page 47 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
2
High service pump station
Administration and maintenance building
Page 48 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
3
Contents
Contents ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3
1. Project Management ............................................................................................................................................. 4
1.1 Meetings ........................................................................................................................................................................4
1.2 Document Management .........................................................................................................................................4
1.3 Schedule ........................................................................................................................................................................4
1.4 Monthly Reports and Invoices ...............................................................................................................................4
2. Project Definition ................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Project Report ..............................................................................................................................................................5
2.2 Raw Water Pump Station Capacity and Hydraulics Study ..........................................................................5
3. Permitting ................................................................................................................................................................ 6
4. Topographic Survey .............................................................................................................................................. 8
5. Predesign of Electrical System Upgrade .......................................................................................................... 9
6. Funding Support ................................................................................................................................................. 10
6.1 Funding Applications ............................................................................................................................................. 10
7. Geotechnical Investigation ............................................................................................................................... 11
8. Early Works Detailed Design ............................................................................................................................ 14
8.1 Site Visit ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15
8.2 Preliminary Design (30% Design) .................................................................................................................... 15
8.3 Early Equipment Procurement ........................................................................................................................... 15
8.4 Detailed Design (60% Design) .......................................................................................................................... 16
8.5 Detailed Design (90% Design) .......................................................................................................................... 16
9. Management Reserve (Prior Written Approval Needed) .......................................................................... 18
9.1 Early Works Phase Final Design (100% Design) ......................................................................................... 18
10. Schedule ............................................................................................................................................................... 19
11. Compensation...................................................................................................................................................... 20
11.1 Rates ............................................................................................................................................................................. 20
11.2 Fee Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 21
12. Appendix: Preliminary Drawing List ............................................................................................................... 23
Page 49 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
4
1. Project Management
Consultant’s project manager will manage the Consultant’s team, task leads, overall execution of the work,
and accurate accounting of the budget and schedule.
1.1 Meetings
Consultant will schedule a kickoff meeting and prepare the agenda and notes. The meeting will be held
virtually (MS Teams). The agenda will include project scope, schedule, workshop topics, and discussion of
City’s concerns and goals for the project. Consultant to be represented by project manager, assistant
project manager, and process lead.
Consultant will schedule regular status meetings via virtual meeting platform. These meetings are planned
week for the duration of the work. The PM and/or Assistant PM will attend the meetings. Status meetings
will be held to discuss, but not limited to, project status, key items, upcoming deliverables, and action
items. If project meeting is determined to not be needed that week, Consultant Project Manager will send
City Project Manager project status update by email.
1.2 Document Management
Consultant will create and manage a Microsoft Teams project site for file sharing and collaboration. This
site will be accessible by identified City staff. A similar site will be created for collaboration during
construction with the City and Construction Contractor.
1.3 Schedule
Consultant will prepare a project schedule in Microsoft Project. The schedule will be reviewed with the City
and then established as the baseline schedule. The schedule will be updated each month with the
monthly status memo.
1.4 Monthly Reports and Invoices
Consultant to provide a monthly project status memo to accompany monthly invoices. The monthly status
memo will describe ongoing work, planned work for the coming month, upcoming deliverables, budget
summary, anticipated delays in schedule, and schedule update.
Assumptions:
▪ Project duration is 12 months for Amendment 2
Deliverables:
▪ Monthly Status Memo and Invoice
Page 50 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
5
2. Project Definition
The purpose of this task is to complete evaluations and studies recommended in the City of Pasco
Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Facilities Plan (2023) for the Amendment 2 scope.
2.1 Project Report
Amendment 2 revises the original contract scope for the Project Report, which only includes the Electrical
Improvements. The Project Report will address the full scope of the Butterfield WTP Improvements.
2.2 Raw Water Pump Station Capacity and Hydraulics Study
Consultant to perform raw water pump station capacity and hydraulics evaluation to confirm the raw water
pump station deficiencies and evaluate alternatives for improvements to the raw water pump station to
meet the firm capacity of 30 mgd after the water treatment improvements. Consultant to perform
computation fluid dynamic (CFD) modeling of the raw water pump station wet well to identify cavitation or
air entrainment issues that may need to be addressed.
Deliverables
▪ Raw Water Pump Station Capacity and Hydraulics Evaluation Technical Memo
Page 51 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
6
3. Permitting
Consultant will provide support for permit applications for the Electrical Reliability, Intake, and Raw Water
Pump Station Improvements only. The permits listed in Table 1 are assumed for the purposes of
developing this scope and budget.
Consultant will prepare a detailed permit matrix to be maintained and updated as part of this work.
Consultant will update the permit matrix that details anticipated local, state, and federal permits required
for the reservoir project. The permit matrix will document the applicable agency, permits, permit triggers,
supporting documentation, estimated permit application submittal dates, estimated permit completion
dates, review status of agency, and anticipated review-completion dates. Consultant will update the permit
matrix as needed, due to changes of regulation requirements, regulatory review processes, or project
design. The permit matrix will be used by Consultant to manage the permitting activity and will be a key
tool in keeping City up to date on the status of the permits.
Table 1. Draft Permit Matrix
Permit or Approval Responsible Agency
Electrical
Reliability
Improvements
Intake and
RWPS
Improvements
FEDERAL
JARPA X
CWA Section 401 Water Quality
Certification
USACE, WA Dept. of Ecology X
CWA Section 404 USACE X
CZMA WA Dept. of Ecology X
Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 USACE X
Rivers and Harbors Act Section 408 USACE X
ESA Section 7 USACE, NMFS, and USFWS X
NHPA Section 106 Cultural Resources
Study
USACE, Tribes, WA Department of
Archaeology and Historic Preservation
X
STATE
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) City of Pasco X X
Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) WA Department of Fish and Wildlife X
NPDES 1200-C Permit WA Department of Ecology X X
Aquatic Easement WA Department of Natural Resources X
Treatment Pilot Test Plan Washington Department of Health (DOH)
Treatment Pilot Test Report Washington Department of Health (DOH)
Plan Review Washington Department of Health (DOH) X X
Project Final Approval Washington Department of Health (DOH) X X
LOCAL
Special Use Permit City of Pasco X X
Land Use Review (Type 2 Review) City of Pasco X
Land Use Compatibility Review City of Pasco X
Floodplain Development Review City of Pasco X
Page 52 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
7
Permit or Approval Responsible Agency
Electrical
Reliability
Improvements
Intake and
RWPS
Improvements
Grading Permit and Plan Review City of Pasco X
Building Permit City of Pasco X
Mechanical and Plumbing Permit City of Pasco X
Electrical Permit Washington State Department of Labor &
Industries
X X
Definitions:
BiOp – Biological Opinion
CWA – Clean Water Act
ESA – Endangered Species Act
JPA – Joint Permit Application
NHPA – National Historic Preservation Act
NMFS – National Marine Fisheries Service
USACE – US Army Corps of Engineers
WQ – Water Quality
Assumptions
▪ City is responsible for paying all fees required as a part of the permit applications and for signing the
applications as the applicant.
▪ City will submit and coordinate all applications to the City of Pasco.
▪ The site does not contain hazardous materials, wetlands, endangered species, or cultural resources.
Deliverables
▪ Permit matrix
▪ Permit application materials
Page 53 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
8
4. Topographic Survey
Surveying services will be procured by Consultant.
Consultant will coordinate with the surveyor to define the scope of work for the survey including the area
to be surveyed and format of deliverables. Technical details pertaining to file type and datum will be
determined ahead of the survey to ensure consistency with existing as-built drawings. One coordination
meeting with surveyor is included to review the work plan and technical details. This survey information
will be used to develop a base map and to assist with development of the site plan as described above.
Assumptions
▪ Survey area will consist of the entire Water Treatment Plant site.
▪ Consultant will provide a markup to surveyor showing the general location of key infrastructure and
underground utilities to be included in the survey.
▪ City will coordinate the marking of underground utilities (power, gas, water mains) ahead of survey
data collection.
▪ City crews will pothole key infrastructure.
▪ Survey data will include 1 ft contours, locations of below grade utilities, location of above grade
structures, fences, property boundary, valve boxes, electrical hand holes, and other elements typical of
a topographical survey.
Deliverables
▪ Topographic survey data and control point coordinate table in electronic format.
Page 54 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
9
5. Predesign of Electrical System Upgrade
Site visits scoped in the original contract are removed as part of Amendment 2.
Page 55 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
10
6. Funding Support
6.1 Funding Applications
The purpose of this task will be to provide grant and loan application assistance for the following funding
applications:
▪ WA State Department of Health Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (SRF)
▪ EPA Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) Loan, including drafting the letter of
interest (LOI)
Consultant will coordinate a meeting with WIFIA and DOH to confirm and negotiate the requirements for
setting up a segment cap approach for funding.
Assumptions
▪ City is responsible for paying all fees required as a part of the funding applications and for signing the
applications as the applicant.
▪ City will submit all applications.
Deliverables
▪ SRF application materials
▪ WIFIA LOI and application materials
Page 56 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
11
7. Geotechnical Investigation
Consultant will review existing subsurface information available from past geotechnical explorations at the
Butterfield Water Treatment Plant and supplement the existing information with new geotechnical
explorations and laboratory testing to inform the Phase 1 geotechnical design.
Jacobs anticipates primary geotechnical issues for the project will include:
• The surface geological unit in the vicinity of the site is unconsolidated alluvium consisting of
“Mostly unconsolidated silt, sand, and gravel valley fill with some clay; includes low -level terrace,
marsh, peat, artificial fill, and glacial deposits locally.” (Huntting et al. 1961). According to
geological hazard maps published by the State of Washington Department of Natural Resources
(DNR 2023), this alluvium is susceptible to liquefaction.
• Construction of embedded structures may require dewatering and subgrade preparation to
stabilize saturated soils for support of structural foundations and slabs.
Therefore, the primary geotechnical objective will be to characterize alluvium beneath the site and
perform geotechnical analyses for the development of code-based foundation recommendations that
address known seismic hazards and constructability.
In accordance with IBC and ASCE-7, the seismic evaluation will include liquefaction screening analysis,
total and differential settlement, surface displacement caused by faulting or seismically induced lateral
spreading or lateral flow, determination of dynamic seismic lateral earth pressures on embedded
structural walls or retaining walls, and seismic design for deep foundations, if applicable. Because the site
is mapped as having potential liquefaction, it is anticipated that a site -specific site response analysis will
be required by code. One-dimensional, equivalent-linear, total stress analysis will be performed to develop
code-compliant seismic ground response spectral accelerations for use in geotechnical and structural
seismic evaluations. The geotechnical evaluation will also include static considerations for the design of
structure foundations, slabs, and walls, as well as construction considerations. Jacobs will also provide
recommendations for site grading, pavement design, and appurtenances.
The proposed subsurface exploration will consist of:
• Two (2) geotechnical borings at the proposed Phase 1 structure locations (i.e., one north and one
south of the existing plant). Based on limited well data for the site vicinity, it is estimated that each
boring will penetrate approximately 100 feet of alluvium and then core 20 feet into bedr ock.
Drilling methods will be mud-rotary, or possibly sonic drilling to better penetrate coarse alluvium
(i.e., coarse gravel and cobbles), pending review of additional available subsurface data. Casing
will be installed to the maximum depth of each borehole to provide access for PS-logging. The
casing will be backfilled with cement-bentonite grout and a surface mount monument will be
installed at grade with a locking cap.
• PS-suspension logging will be done within the casing in each boring to characterize the shear
wave velocity profile and for use in liquefaction screening and foundation design .
• One (1) open-standpipe piezometer will be installed to a depth of approximately 35 feet in a
boring offset nominally 20 feet from one of the geotechnical borings for the purpose of
measuring the groundwater elevation and for variable head (“slug”) tests to investigate hydraulic
parameters for construction dewatering. No soil sampling is planned for this offset boring.
Page 57 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
12
• Four (4) test pits for design of Phase 1 pavements. Each test pit will extend to a depth of about
6 feet to characterize pavement subgrade and to obtain bulk soil samples for laboratory testing.
Test pits will be completed using a rubber-tired backhoe equipped with a toothed, nominally 2-ft-
wide bucket. No personnel will enter a trench deeper than 3 feet. Upon completion, each test pit
will be backfilled with the excavation spoils, placed and compacted in lifts by tamping with the
backhoe bucket.
• Laboratory testing:
• Soil classification testing for selected boring and test pit samples.
• Soil compressibility and shear strength, if fine -grained soils are encountered.
• Corrosivity testing.
As a part of the subsurface exploration, the Consultant will:
1. Review existing subsurface data in the site vicinity.
2. Develop the final geotechnical subsurface exploration plan.
3. Perform drilling and logging of geotechnical borings. If mud-rotary drilling methods are used, this will
include Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) at typically 5-feet intervals to collect samples for
laboratory testing and to provide a measure of the soil relative consistency. For sonic drilling methods,
a continuous (disturbed) sample will be obtained for soil descriptions and laboratory testing, a nd the
soil consistency would be evaluated based on the shear wave velocity from PS-logging.
4. Identify select soil samples for laboratory testing, such as moisture content, density, plasticity, and
grain size, to use for soil classification and correlations with engineering properties.
5. Provide a field engineer to oversee geotechnical subsurface explorations in their entirety.
6. Develop boring logs.
7. Survey final boring locations.
Reporting will include:
• Geotechnical Data Report. This factual data report will describe and summarize results for the
subsurface exploration. It is intended for use in all phases of design and may be included in
construction contract documents.
• Geotechnical Site Characterization and Seismic Hazards Report. This design report will present the
Consultants interpretations for the subsurface conditions and summarize seismic hazards
evaluations including liquefaction, seismic settlement, and lateral s preading.
• Phase 1 Geotechnical Design Report. Building on the above two reports, Consultant will develop
comprehensive design recommendations for Phase 1.
Draft reports will be prepared and submitted electronically to City for review. Consolidated comments
from City’s review will be incorporated into final reports.
Assumptions
▪ City will provide existing utility information and utility locates prior to geotechnical field work .
Page 58 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
13
▪ Consultant will obtain any permits necessary to conduct this work .
▪ The site does not contain hazardous materials, wetlands, endangered species, or cultural resources.
▪ Soil and groundwater encountered during the field exploration will be free of environmental
contamination and will not require special monitoring, handling, testing, or disposal.
▪ Geotechnical boring, including casing and well installations will be performed by a subcontractor in
five days using either a truck-mounted or track-mounted drilling rig. While efforts will be made to
minimize rutting of landscaped areas, some disturbance is anticipated. No restoration of landscaping is
planned.
▪ Geophysical testing using PS-logging equipment will be performed by a subcontractor in a single day
and will not require heavy equipment.
▪ Test pits will be completed by subcontractor in a single day.
▪ The planned exploration locations will be surveyed and staked by a subcontractor for the purpose of
utility locating prior to mobilization of work crews. It is assumed that City staff will clear existing site
utilities and coordinate with other public utility locators as needed.
▪ Consultant will provide one field staff to oversee the geotechnical borings, geophysical testing, and test
pit excavations. Two site visits are anticipated.
- The first site visit is estimated to be for five days to supervise the geotechnical borings, including
casing and open-standpipe piezometer installation.
- The second site visit will be for three days to supervise PS-logging, test pit explorations, slug
testing, groundwater level measurements, and surveying of as-drilled exploration locations.
▪ Drill fluids and cuttings from borings, and pumped water generated by slug testing will be removed
from site.
Deliverables
▪ Geotechnical Data Report
▪ Geotechnical Site Characterization and Seismic Hazards Report
▪ Phase 1 Geotechnical Design Report
Page 59 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
14
8. Early Works Detailed Design
For the purposes of this scope of work, the early works improvements are assumed to include the
following improvements delivered in one construction package for conventional (design -bid-build)
bidding and construction:
1. Electrical reliability.
a. Replacement of three existing motor control centers (MCCs)
2. Intake and Raw Water Pump Station improvements.
a. Replacement of two existing screens with ISI mechanically brushed screens.
b. Replace two smaller raw water pumps with 10 MGD pumps.
c. Replace leaking check valve on raw water pump #9.
d. Install pressure indicator/transmitters on each raw water pump discharge.
e. Install redundant level indicator/transmitter on raw water wet well.
f. Replace electrical distribution panels and harmonic filters.
g. Install two new variable frequency drives at raw water pump station.
h. Install connection for standby power for RWPS and backwash lift station.
i. Install security fencing and cameras around raw water pump station and backwash lift
station.
j. Install ledger angle to support tread plate in raw water pump station and weld pump plate
to baseplate.
A pre-procurement package for the MCCs will be completed to allow the pre -purchasing of the MCCs due
to the long lead time.
Consultant will complete a detailed design of the project by developing a 30%, 60%, 90%, and final
(100% complete) Contract Documents. The completed design documents will consist of bidding
documents, contract documents based on Consultant standard contract and general conditions, Division 1
specifications, technical specifications, and drawings. This combined package of documents will be
referred to hereinafter as the Contract Documents.
City will provide review comments for each design milestone in a Bluebeam Revu Studio Session
coordinated by Consultant. City will internally adjudicate its review comments to provide clear direction for
Consultant. Consultant will provide a written response within the Bluebeam Revu Studio Session to each
written review comment provided by City and incorporate the comments into the subsequent design
documents accordingly. At the beginning of each design milestone review period, a 4 -hour meeting will be
held to provide an overview of the design deliverable.
Assumptions:
▪ Early Works Projects will be bid in one construction contract.
▪ Level of effort is based on preliminary drawing list, included as Appendix 1.
Page 60 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
15
▪ Construction of projects may be funded with State or federal funding. Contracting requirements will be
included as a dedicated specification section to address supplemental funding requirements based on
Consultant’s experience on similar projects.
▪ Detailed design will go through 90% design. Written authorization will be required to complete the
final design of the early works improvements. The scope for 100% design is included as management
reserve.
8.1 Site Visit
Consultant will visit the site, accompanied by City staff, to identify tie-ins, site constraints, and validate site
layout assumptions. The site visit will be up to 2 days for the project manager, process engineer, electrical
engineer, intake design lead, and structural engineer.
8.2 Preliminary Design (30% Design)
Consultant will undertake a preliminary design process on the facility improvements identified for this
work that result in a 30-percent complete draft design submittal. The schematic design submittal will
consist of 30-percent complete drawings and a Basis of Design Report that identifies key facility design
criteria. A preliminary list of anticipated specifications will also be provided.
Consultant will prepare design drawings that represent completion of the design project to a 30%
complete level. Drawings that comprise the Preliminary Design package will be draft drawings that
include structural drawings that show the size and configuration of new facilities, process mechanical plan
and section drawings showing key equipment and connections, electrical plan and section drawings and
one-line diagram, and control system drawings.
Consultant will prepare the Basis of Design Report (BODR) that summarizes the design and sizing criteria,
major equipment, code-compliance requirements, equipment and materials selections, and CAD
standards. The BODR will enable Consultant’s design team t o effectively move from the preliminary
design stage into the detailed design stage of the project. Consultant will prepare and submit the BODR
electronically, for the City’s review and comment.
Consultant will prepare an opinion of probable cost at 30% (AACE International Class 3). Cost Estimates
will be prepared by Consultant’s cost estimating and construction professionals. A memo will be provided
explaining the data upon which the cost estimate was based. In providing opinions of construction cost,
Consultant has no control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent conditions of
existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or maintenance costs; competitive bidd ing
procedures and market conditions; time or quality of performance by operating personnel or third parties;
and other economic and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate project cost or
schedule. Therefore, Consultant makes no warranty that the City’s actual project costs, financial aspects,
economic feasibility, or schedules will not vary from Consultant’s analyses, projections, and/or estimates.
8.3 Early Equipment Procurement
A procurement package will be developed for the MCCs. The procurement package will include technical
specifications and any additional specifications required for procurement. It will also include any drawings
required for inclusion in the procurement package. Specifications will be developed to 90% design level.
Consultant will prepare drawings to the level of completion required for equipment procurement, and
coordinate with vendors to define preliminary equipment layouts. The Consultant will review equi pment
proposals and provide recommendation of award.
Page 61 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
16
8.4 Detailed Design (60% Design)
The 60% design document will incorporate City review comments from the preliminary design (30%
document). Consultant will prepare a 60% complete submittal of the design. Consultant will prepare and
submit the 60% complete submittal electronically in PDF format on 11” x 17” drawings, for the City’s
review and comment.
Consultant will prepare an opinion of probable cost at 60% (AACE International Class 2). Cost Estimates
will be prepared by Consultant’s cost estimating and construction professionals. A memo will be provided
explaining the data upon which the cost estimate was based. In providing opinions of construction cost,
Consultant has no control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent conditions of
existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or maintenance costs; competitive bidd ing
procedures and market conditions; time or quality of performance by operating personnel or third parties;
and other economic and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate project cost or
schedule. Therefore, Consultant makes no warranty that the City’s actual project costs, financial aspects,
economic feasibility, or schedules will not vary from Consultant’s analyses, projections, and/or estimates.
8.5 Detailed Design (90% Design)
The 90% design document will incorporate City review comments from the 60% design submittal.
Consultant will prepare a 90% complete submittal of the design. The 90% complete submittal will be
substantially complete in all aspects necessary to complete the construction contract. Review of the 90%
complete submittal package will be the City’s final opportunity to effect changes to the design prior to
advertising the construction contract.
Consultant will prepare and submit the 90% complete submittal electronically in PDF format on 11” x 17”
drawings, for the City’s review and comment. City and Consultant acknowledge that review of the 90%
complete submittal for approval by the State, City, and other applicable agencies for obtaining permits will
be simultaneous.
Upon receipt of all agency review comments, City and Consultant will meet to discuss the 90% complete
design submittal, City’s review comments, and the review comments from the agencies.
Consultant will prepare an opinion of probable cost at 90% design (AACE International Class 1). Cost
Estimates will be prepared by Consultant’s cost estimating and construction professionals. A memo will be
provided explaining the data upon which the cost estimate was based. In providing opinions of
construction cost, Consultant has no control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent
conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or maintenance costs;
competitive bidding procedures and market conditions; time or quality of performance by operating
personnel or third parties; and other economic and operational factors that may materially affect the
ultimate project cost or schedule. Therefore, Consultant makes n o warranty that the City’s actual project
costs, financial aspects, economic feasibility, or schedules will not vary from Consultant’s analyses,
projections, and/or estimates.
Deliverables
▪ Basis of Design Report, 30% Plans, and Opinion of Probable Cost
▪ Procurement Package Plans and Specifications
▪ 60% Plans, Specifications, and Opinion of Probable Cost, Division 0 and 1 Specifications in Word
format as well, response-to-comments
Page 62 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
17
▪ 90% Plans, Specifications, and Opinion of Probable Cost. Division 0 and 1 Specifications in Word
format as well, response-to-comments
Page 63 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
18
9. Management Reserve (Prior Written Approval Needed)
This task is for Management Reserve use. Consultant must obtain written approval from the City prior to
utilizing Management Reserve funds. Use of Management Reserve funds without prior written approval
will result in charges removed/denied.
9.1 Early Works Phase Final Design (100% Design)
The management reserve will include the early works phase final design (100% design) for bid package.
Consultant will prepare a 100% complete submittal of the design. Consultant will incorporate City’s and
agency review comments from the 90% submittal into the 100% complete design submittal. The 100%
complete submittal will be used to bid the construction contract. No meetings to review or discuss the
100-percent complete design package are planned or budgeted.
Consultant will submit electronically stamped 100-percent-complete contract documents submittal in
PDF format for use by the City for bidding the construction contract. PDF drawings will be half-size,
11”x17”.
Design changes that impact the cost estimate are not anticipated after 90% design, but the estimate will
be updated based on the 100% design if needed.
Deliverables
▪ Final Plans, Specifications, and Opinion of Probable Cost, Division 0 and 1 Specifications in Word
format as well, response-to-comments
Page 64 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
19
10. Schedule
Pa
g
e
6
5
o
f
3
0
6
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
20
11.Compensation
11.1 Rates
Compensation will be made using standard hourly rates, plus expenses expressly eligible for
reimbursement, as described in the Agreement Between City and Consultant for Professional Services.
Billing rates shown in Table 2 below will be escalated by 3% each year starting in January 2025.
Table 2. Consultant Billing Rates
Title Hourly Billing Rate (2023-2024)
Professionals
Project manager $325
Assistant PM $225
Expert Technical Engineer $325
Senior technical consultant $280
Senior review engineer $250
Senior engineer $225
Lead engineer $215
Senior Professional $200
Associate Engineer $190
Lead Professional $190
Staff engineer $170
Intermediate Engineer $150
Global Design Engineer (all levels) $130
Entry engineer $120
Engineering Intern $90
Science Intern $70
Technicians
Specialist CAD Technician $205
CAD Supervisor $190
Senior CAD Technician $170
Lead CAD Technician/Specifications $140
CAD Technician/Document Processing/Specifications $125
Global Design CAD (all levels) $110
Intermediate CAD Technician $110
Entry CAD Technician $90
Administration
Project Controls $145
Lead Administrative Assistant $135
Administrative Assistant $115
Intermediate Administrative Assistant $95
Entry Administrative Assistant $85
EXHIBIT B
Page 66 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
21
11.2 Fee Summary
The estimated hours and cost for each task are summarized below. These values are provided as guidance
and actual hours and costs will vary based on staff assigned and execution of the work. The actual
individual task expenditures may be more or less than the budgeted amount within the overall not-to-
exceed contract value. Expenses shall be within the federal and state guidelines to be reimbursable.
Page 67 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
22
Table 3. Fee Summary by Task
Original Contract
($533,300)
Amendment 1
($60,000)
Amendment 2
($1,173,3000)
Total Project
($1,766,600)
Title Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost
Task 1. Project Management 364 $88,700 408 $90,240 772 $178,940
Task 2. Project Definition 706 $153,190 128 $23,560 834 $176,750
Task 3. Permitting 124 $24,420 690 $138,780 814 $163,200
Task 4. Topographic Survey 52 $7,560 $38,840 52 $46,400
Task 5. Electrical Facility Pre-Design 1,049 $188,710 -92 ($24,470) 957 $164,240
Task7. Geotechnical Investigation 628 $167,560 628 $167,560
Task 8. Detailed Design of Early Works
Package through 90% Design 2,636 $481,500 2,636 $481,500
Expenses: Travel and Miscellaneous $11,340 $18,130 $29,470
Expenses: Geotech Drilling and Lab
Services $87,570 $87,570
Expenses: Geotech Travel $4,370 $4,370
Management Reserve (original contract) 143 $26,080 -143 ($26,080) 0 $0
Subtotal – SRF/PWB Funded Tasks $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000
Management Reserve - Detailed Design
of Early Works Bid Package 514 $95,200 514 $95,200
Task 6. Funding Alternatives and
Applications 88 $21,240 400 $78,100 488 $99,340
Task 9. Permanganate Design 332 $60,000 332 $60,000
SRF Application Support to date 53 $12,060 53 $12,060
Subtotal – Additional Support $33,300 $60,000 $173,300 $266,600
Contract Total 2,579 $533,300 332 $60,000 5,169 $1,173,300 7,748 $1,766,600
Pa
g
e
6
8
o
f
3
0
6
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
23
12. Appendix: Preliminary Drawing List
Table A1. Early Works Preliminary Drawing List
01 - General
1 01-G-001 TITLE, VICINITY, AND LOCATION MAP
2 01-G-002 DRAWING INDEX
3 01-G-003 ABBREVIATIONS - 1 OF 2
4 01-G-004 ABBREVIATIONS - 2 OF 2
5 01-G-005 STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES - 1
6 01-G-006 STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES - 2
7 01-G-007 BASIS OF DESIGN, DESIGN CRITERIA
8 01-G-008 PIPE SCHEDULE AND FLOW STREAM IDENTIFICATION
9 01-G-009 HYDRAULIC PROFILE
10 01-G-010 VALVE SCHEDULE
11 01-G-011 LEGEND - CIVIL AND YARD PIPING
12 01-G-012 LEGEND - ELECTRICAL
13 01-G-013 ELECTRICAL NOTES
14 01-G-014 LEGEND - INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL - 1
15 01-G-015 LEGEND - INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL - 2
16 01-G-016 LEGEND - INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL - NETWORK BLOCK DIAGRAM
17 01-G-017 MATERIAL AND AREA CLASSIFICATION SELECTION TABLE
05 - Site Development
18 05-C-001 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SURVEY CONTROL PLAN
19 05-C-003 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL GENERAL NOTES
20 05-C-004 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
21 05-C-005 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - DETAILS
22 05-C-006 SITE PLAN - OVERALL
23 05-C-007 SITE PLAN - ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY
24 05-Y-001 YARD PIPING PLAN - ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY
25 05-Y-002 YARD PIPING DETAILS
26 05-C-008 GRADING PLAN - ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY
06 - Site Electrical
27 06-E-001 ELECTRICAL SITE DEMOLITION PLAN
28 06-E-002 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN - ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY
29 06-E-003 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN - INTAKE AND RWPS
30 06-E-004 DUCTBANK SCHEDULE
Page 69 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
24
09 - Instrumentation and Control
31 09-I-001 INTAKE - PUMPS P&ID
32 09-I-002 INTAKE - SCREENS P&ID
33 09-I-003 POWER MONITORING - P&ID
34 09-I-004 NETWORK BLOCK DIAGRAM - OVERALL
15 - ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS
35 15-S-001 PLAN
36 15-S-002 DETAILS
37 15-E-001 PLAN - DEMO
38 15-E-002 PLAN - DEMO
39 15-E-003 PLAN - FILTER/ADMIN BUILDING
40 15-E-004 PLAN - FILTER/ADMIN BUILDING
41 15-E-005 DEMO ONE-LINE DIAGRAM
42 15-E-006 REVISED ONE-LINE DIAGRAM
43 15-E-007 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES
INTAKE/RWPS IMPROVEMENTS
44 20-D-001 DEMO PLAN AND SECTION
45 20-C-001 OVERALL PLAN
46 20-S-001 INTAKE STRUCTURAL PLAN
47 20-S-002 INTAKE STRUCTURAL SECTIONS
48 20-M-001 INTAKE PLAN
49 20-M-002 INTAKE SECTION
50 20-M-003 INTAKE DETAILS
51 20-M-004 RWPS PROCESS PIPING PLAN AND SECTION
52 20-M-005 RWPS PROCESS PIPING DETAILS
53 20-M-006 RWPS PLAN
54 20-M-007 RWPS DETAILS
55 20-E-001 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN
56 20-E-002 PLAN - DEMO
57 20-E-003 DEMO ONE-LINE DIAGRAM
58 20-E-004 REVISED ONE-LINE DIAGRAM
59 20-E-005 CONDUIT AND RACEWAY SCHEDULE
60 20-E-006 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES
61 20-E-007 SECURITY RISER DIAGRAM
Page 70 of 306
Butterfield WTP Improvements Scope of Work
25
100 - STANDARD DETAILS
62 100-SD-01 STANDARD DETAILS - CIVIL
63 100-SD-02 STANDARD DETAILS - STRUCTURAL
64 100-SD-03 STANDARD DETAILS - STRUCTURAL
65 100-SD-04 STANDARD DETAILS - STRUCTURAL
66 100-SD-05 STANDARD DETAILS - STRUCTURAL
67 100-SD-06 STANDARD DETAILS - STRUCTURAL
68 100-SD-07 STANDARD DETAILS - STRUCTURAL
69 100-SD-08 STANDARD DETAILS - STRUCTURAL
70 100-SD-09 STANDARD DETAILS - PROCESS MECHANICAL
71 100-SD-10 STANDARD DETAILS - PROCESS MECHANICAL
72 100-SD-11 STANDARD DETAILS - ELECTRICAL
73 100-SD-12 STANDARD DETAILS - ELECTRICAL
74 100-SD-13 STANDARD DETAILS - ELECTRICAL
75 100-SD-14 STANDARD DETAILS - ELECTRICAL
76 100-SD-15 STANDARD DETAILS - INSTRUMENTATION
76 TOTAL SHEETS
Page 71 of 306
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Regular Meeting
Pa
g
e
7
2
o
f
3
0
6
PSA Amendment No. 2 –
Butterfield WTP
Improvements
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
7
3
o
f
3
0
6
Butterfield WTP – Existing Facility
3
W. A St.
Raw Water Pump Station
Intake Screen Air Burst System
Raw Water Pump Station Electrical Panel
Pa
g
e
7
4
o
f
3
0
6
Butterfield WTP – Early Works Improvements Phase
4Proposed Electrical Reliability Improvements at the Existing Water Treatment Plant
Pa
g
e
7
5
o
f
3
0
6
Butterfield WTP – PSA Amendment No. 2 for Jacobs
Engineering Group, Inc.
5
Butterfield WTP Improvements
$1,173,300Amendment No. 2 (proposed)
$1,766,600New PSA Total
$8.8 millionTotal estimated project Cost for
Early Works -Construction
Summary of Amendment No. 2 Scope
•Design Services for Early Works Reliability Improvements
•Electrical System and River Intake Screen Upgrades
•Raw Water Pump Station Improvements
•Geotechnical and Topographical Surveys
•Funding Application Assistance (i.e., DWSRF, WIFIA, etc.)
•Permitting Assistance
Pa
g
e
7
6
o
f
3
0
6
Questions?Pa
g
e
7
7
o
f
3
0
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 29, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Maria Serra, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4515 - West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Phases 3 and
4 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan Acceptance
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
Exhibit A - DWSRF Loan Agreement
Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4515, approving and authorizing
the City Manager to execute and deliver the Drinking Water State Revolving
Fund Loan Contract No. DWL293303-0 with the Washington State Department
of 4 and 3 Phases Plant Treatment West Pasco the for Health Water
Improvements.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
The City was awarded a $12 million loan to fund full construction of the West
Pasco Water Treatment Plant (WPWTP) Phase 3 and 4 Improvements. The
loan is administered by the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) as
part of their Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) program. The loan
has a 24-year term with an effective interest rate of 1.75% and an included
service fee of 1%.
Additionally, the loan as awarded qualifies for loan principal forgiveness. As
stated in the loan Declarations, the principal loan forgiveness represents 48.5%
of the total loan amount, or $5.8 million. Non-repayable principal is effective at
project completion. This award saves the City's utility over $7 million in interest
payments and $5.8 million in principal forgiveness; total of $12.8 million of
savings.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Page 78 of 306
The 2019 Comprehensive Water System Plan identified a series of plant and
pumping system expansions necessary to achieve a reliable WPWTP
treatment capacity of 18 Million Gallons per Day (MGD). Phase 2 of the plant
improvements in anticipated completion with is in currently construction
Summer 2025. The packaged Phases 3 and 4 of the planned improvements
include the design and construction to increase potable water production from
12MGD to 18MGD.
In November of 2023, Resolution No. 4397 was approved to authorize the City
to apply for a Washington State DOH low-interest loan through the DWSRF
program. The program provides low-interest construction loans to fund publicly
owned municipal water systems. These loans cover capital improvements
aimed at maintaining compliance with state and federal regulations, for safe
and reliable drinking water municipal infrastructure.
The City was selected as a recipient for the DWSRF 24-year construction loan
for the WPWTP Phase 3 and 4 Improvements. The loan from DOH will be used
for full construction of the expanded membrane filtration system, cyanotoxin
treatment, service pumps, and backwash recovery system. This includes
funding for construction management and inspection services, commissioning,
start-up, and any subsequent permitting and regulatory documentation
necessary to comply with federal loan administration requirements.
V. DISCUSSION:
This item was discussed at the October 28, 2024 Council Workshop meeting.
Staff from agreement loan low-interest recommends of approval the the
Washington State Department of Health Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
program for the construction of the West Pasco Phase 3 and 4 Improvements
Projects.
Page 79 of 306
Resolution - DWSRF Loan Contract DWL29303-0 - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AND DELIVER DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND (DWSRF)
LOAN CONTRACT NO. DWL29303-0 WITH WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FOR THE WEST PASCO WATER TREATMENT
PLANT (WTP) PHASES 3 AND 4 PROJECTS.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) currently provides reliable potable water service to
a population of over 80,000 with projected increases in future water system usage anticipated; and
WHEREAS, the 2019 Comprehensive Water System Plan identified needed
improvements to the West Pasco WTP in order to increase water filtration capacity and potable
water production from 12 Million Gallons per Day (MGD) to 18 MGD and
WHEREAS, to help fund these improvements, the Council authorized staff to apply for a
DWSRF loan in the principal amount of up to $12,000,000 bearing interest at an interest rate of
1.75% per annum; and
WHEREAS, the proposed loan has a term of 24 years and a one percent (1%) service fee
included in the loan amount upon execution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into DWSRF
Loan Contract No. DWL29303-0 with Washington State Department of Health.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the
DWSRF Loan Contract No. DWL29303-0 between the City of Pasco and Washington State
Department of Health as attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized and directed to execute and deliver DWSRF Loan Contract No. DWL29303-0 on behalf
of the City of Pasco to the Washington State Department of Health.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 80 of 306
Resolution - DWSRF Loan Contract DWL29303-0 - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of
___________, 2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC William G. Tonkin, Attorney
City Clerk Foster Garvey P.C.
Page 81 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226
September 26, 2024
City of Pasco
Adam R. Lincoln
525 North Third Ave
Pasco, WA 99301
lincolna@pasco-wa.gov
RE: Loan Contract Number: DWL29303-0
Dear Mr. Lincoln,
Enclosed is the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan Contract Number identified above for your signature. The
Loan Contract details the terms and conditions that will govern the agreement between us, which includes the project's
Scope of Work as a formal attachment. Failure to return the contracts within 60 calendar days of the date of this letter may
result in your loan offer being withdrawn.
Review, print and sign the document. Once signatures are obtained, scan and return by email to
dohcon.mgmt@doh.wa.gov or print and sign a hard copy and return the originals to us for full execution.
Please note that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is the funding source for this program and the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number is 66.468. Consequently, the loan funds are federal and subject to both
state and federal requirements.
A non-refundable one-percent loan administration fee will be collected at contract execution (If applicable), including any
subsequent amendments where funds are added. The loan amount may be modified to include an amount sufficient to
cover the one-percent loan administration fee. In most cases, the fee will be collected in full at contract execution. Please
review the terms and conditions of the Loan Contract and all attachments carefully for details.
A requirement of the DWSRF program is that you must maintain updated project records and yearly renewal of your
registration in the System for Award Management at www.sam.gov.
Another requirement of the DWSRF program is that all entities are required to verify that the federal government has not
suspended or debarred them from receiving federal funds. This includes, but is not limited to, project contractors,
subcontractors, engineers, architects, consultants, and equipment vendors. The Exclusion Report can be accessed at
www.sam.gov. Failure to provide this required certification may result in termination of your loan contract.
After the Loan Contracts have been signed by the Department or its designee, one fully executed original will be returned
to you for your files. Instructions for drawing the loan funds will be returned to you with the executed Loan Contract, as
well as the necessary forms. The Loan Contract specifies that draws may be made for costs that have been incurred
within the contract period of performance, and which have supporting documentation such as receipts or bills.
We are looking forward to working with you over the course of this project. If you have any questions about this Loan
Contract, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Rachel Paris
DOH Contract Manager
206.236.4294
Rachel.Paris@DOH.WA.GOV
Enclosures:
ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK (PROJECT)
ATTACHMENT II: ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION
ATTACHMENT III: FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS
ATTACHMENT IV: DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE REQUIREMENTS
ATTACHMENT V: CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS
ATTACHMENT VI: DWSRF ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS
ATTACHMENT VII: LABOR STANDARD PROVISIONS FOR SUBRECIPIENTS THAT ARE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES
Page 82 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226
Version History
Date Revision(s)
Version
05-15-2018 Original - developed via a team of the
DWSRF Grant and Loan Unit
Supervisor, the DOH Office of
Drinking Water Finance Director, the
DOH Office of Contracts and
Procurement Technical and Policy
Advisor, and DOH’s Financial Services
Assistant Attorney General.
1
Washington State Department of Health
DWSRF Municipal
Loan Boilerplate
May 2018
Page 83 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 1 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
1. CONTRACT FACE SHEET
#2023-4226 Loan Number: DWL29303-0
Washington State Department of Health (DOH)
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Municipal
1. Borrower 2. Borrower Doing Business As (optional)
City of Pasco
525 North Third Ave
Pasco, WA 99301
3. Borrower Type
Construction Loan
4. Borrower’s Statutory Authority
5. Borrower Contract Manager Information 6. DOH Contract Manager
Adam R. Lincoln
509-544-4131
lincolna@pasco-wa.gov Rachel Paris
P.O. Box 47822
Olympia, WA 98504-7822
360.236.4294
rachel.paris@doh.wa.gov
7. Project Name
West Pasco Treatment Plant Improvement Phase 3 and 4
8. Loan 9. Funding Source 10. Start Date 11. End Date
Amount: $12,000,000.00
Loan Fee: 0.00
Interest Rate: 1.75%
Federal: State:
Other:
DOE 10/01/2048
12. Federal Funding Agency Environmental Protection Agency
Catalogue of Federal Assistance (CFDA) Number 66.468
13. Borrower Tax ID #
91-1983815
14. SWV #
000716400
15. Borrower UBI #
113000052
16. Borrower UEI #
VJX8X4J5TL95
17. Contract Purpose
DOH and the party identified above as Borrower, hereafter referred to as BORROWER, have entered into this
contract to fund the project identified above that furthers the goals and objectives of the DOH DWSRF Program.
The project will be done by the BORROWER as described in the scope of work and this contract. The rights and
obligations of the parties are governed by this contract and the following documents incorporated by reference:
General Terms and Conditions including Declarations; Attachment I: Scope of Work (Project); Attachment II
Attorney's Certification; Attachment III: Federal and State Requirements; Attachment IV: Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise Requirements; Attachment V: Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility
Matters; Attachment VI: DWSRF Eligible Project Costs; and Attachment VII: Labor Standard Provisions for
Subrecipients that are Governmental Entities. By the signature below, the parties acknowledge and accept the
terms of this contract.
FOR CONTRACTOR FOR DOH
SIGNATURE AND DATE SIGNATURE and DATE
NAME and TITLE NAME and TITLE
APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY
Mark Calkins, AAG Signature on File
Page 84 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 2 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. CONTRACT FACE SHEET
2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
3. DECLARATIONS
3.1. BORROWER INFORMATION
3.2. PROJECT INFORMATION (PROJECT)
3.3. CONTRACT COMMUNICATION
3.4. LOAN INFORMATION
3.5. FUNDING INFORMATION
3.6. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
4. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
4.1. AUTHORITY
4.2. FULL AGREEMENT
4.3. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
4.4. LOAN AMOUNT
4.5. LOAN FEE
4.6. LOAN TERM
4.7. INTEREST RATE
4.8. LOAN FORGIVENESS
4.9. RELEASE OF LOAN FUNDS AND REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
4.10. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
4.11. PROJECT COMPLETION AMENDMENT AND THE PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT
4.12. LOAN PAYMENTS
4.13. LOAN DEFAULT
4.14. LOAN SECURITY
4.15. AMENDMENTS, MODIFICATIONS, ASSIGNMENTS AND WAIVERS
4.16. BUILD AMERICA, BUY AMERICA
4.17. ATTORNEY’S FEES
4.18. BONUS AND COMMISSION PAYMENTS NOT ALLOWED
4.19. COMPLIANCE
4.20. DISPUTES
4.21. ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS
4.22. FALSE, INCORRECT, OR INCOMPLETE INFORMATION OR CLAIM
4.23. FINANCIAL AUDIT
4.24. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE
4.25. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL REQUIREMENTS
4.26. INDEMNIFICATION
4.27. INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Page 85 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 3 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
4.28. LITIGATION
4.29. NONDISCRIMINATION
4.30. PREVAILING WAGE
4.31. PROCUREMENT
4.32. PROHIBITION STATEMENT
4.33. PROJECT SIGNS
4.34. PUBLICITY
4.35. RATES AND RESERVES
4.36. RECAPTURE
4.37. RECORDKEEPING AND ACCESS TO RECORDS
4.38. REGISTRATION WITH THE SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM)
4.39. SEVERABILITY
4.40. SUBCONTRACTING
4.41. SURVIVAL
4.42. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE
4.43. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION FOR CONVENIENCE
4.44. TERMINATION PROCEDURES
4.45. WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS
ATTACHMENT I SCOPE OF WORK (PROJECT)
ATTACHMENT II ATTORNEY’S CERTIFICATION
ATTACHMENT III FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS
ATTACHMENT IV DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE REQUIREMENTS
ATTACHMENT V CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER
RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS
ATTACHMENT VI DWSRF ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS
ATTACHMENT VII LABOR STANDARD PROVISIONS FOR SUBRECIPIENTS THAT ARE GOVERNMENTAL
ENTITIES
Page 86 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 4 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
3. DECLARATIONS
3.1 BORROWER INFORMATION
Legal Name: City of Pasco
Loan Number: DWL29303-0
Award Year: 2023
State Wide Vendor Number: SWV# 000716400
3.2. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Title: West Pasco Treatment Plant Improvement phase 3 and 4
Project Location (City or County): Franklin
Project State: Washington
Project Zip Code: 99301
Project Scope of Work (PROJECT): Attachment I, attached hereto and incorporated by reference
3.3 CONTRACT COMMUNICATION
Communications regarding Contract performance is delegated by each party to its Contract Manager. Either party may change its
Contract Manager by notice to the other party. Either party may identify on an as needed basis an alternate Contract Manager to
serve during the stated temporary absence of its primary Contract Manager. Notices between the parties regarding Contract
performance must be provided by written communication to the other party’s Contract Manager. Written communication includes
email but not voice mail. Notices are presumed received by the other party’s Contract Manager upon evidence of delivery between
the hours of 8:00 am to 5:00 pm except for state holidays and weekends.
3.4 LOAN INFORMATION
Loan Amount: $12,000,000.00
Loan Fee (Included in loan amount if applicable): $0.00
Principal Loan Forgiveness: 48.5%
Loan Term: 24 years
Interest Rate: 1.75%
Payment Month(s): October 1st Annually
Earliest Date for Construction Reimbursement: 12 months prior to contract counter signed by DOH
Time of Performance: 48 months from Contract start date (date of last
signature) to project Completion date.
Notice to Proceed: 18 months from Contract start date
3.5 FUNDING INFORMATION
Total Funds from BORROWER: $0.00
Source(s) of Funds from Borrower, with assigned amounts per source: N/A
Total State Funds: $12,000,000.00
Total Amount of Federal Award (as applicable): N/A
Total Amount of Loan: $12,000,000.00
Federal Award Date: N/A
Federal Award ID # (FAIN): N/A
Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this Action: N/A
3.6 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
N/A
Page 87 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 5 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
4. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND
(MUNICIPAL)
4.1. AUTHORITY
Acting under the authority of Section 1452 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Section 130, RCW 39.34, RCW
43.70.040, and RCW 70.119A.170 the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) has awarded BORROWER a
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan (LOAN) for the project identified in the Declarations (PROJECT). Under
this CONTRACT, BORROWER is a sub-recipient of funds provided by the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), CFDA Number 66.468, Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund.
In some CONTRACT attachments, DOH is referred to as “Lender” and BORROWER is referred to as “Contractor.”
4.2. FULL AGREEMENT
This CONTRACT contains the full agreement of the parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding
the subject matter of this CONTRACT exists.
4.3. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
In the event of an inconsistency in this CONTRACT, unless otherwise provided herein, the inconsistency shall be
resolved by giving precedence in the following order: The order of precedence for terms and conditions under
categories B and C is subject to the proviso that when a contract term or condition appears in more than one
contract document, the more specific contract term or condition shall control if the different contract provisions
cannot be harmonized.
A. Applicable local, state, and federal statutes and regulations
B. Contract amendments
C. The Contract (in this order)
Declarations and Special Terms and Conditions
General Terms and Conditions
Attachments I – VII
4.4. LOAN AMOUNT
DOH, using funds from the Drinking Water Assistance Account, will loan BORROWER a sum not to exceed the
amount shown as LOAN AMOUNT in the Declarations. The LOAN AMOUNT shall not exceed one hundred percent
(100%) of the actual eligible PROJECT costs.
4.5. LOAN FEE
If DOH assessed a LOAN FEE, it is shown in the Declarations as LOAN FEE and included in the total LOAN
AMOUNT. The fee (if applicable) is one percent (1%) of the loan request and will not be reduced, regardless of the
final LOAN AMOUNT at PROJECT completion. If the LOAN FEE applies and the total LOAN AMOUNT is
increased by amendment, DOH will assess an additional LOAN FEE equal to one percent (1%) of the additional
LOAN AMOUNT. LOAN FEES are non-refundable.
4.6. LOAN TERM
Unless changed by an amendment, the LOAN TERM will not exceed the period of time shown in the Declarations.
The repayment period for DOH subsidized loans is twenty-four (24) years from this CONTRACT’s start date. The
repayment period for non-DOH subsidized loans is twenty (20) years from this CONTRACT’s start date.
4.7. INTEREST RATE
The interest rate is stated in the Declarations. Interest is per annum on the outstanding principal balance and starts
to accrue from the date DOH releases LOAN FUNDS to BORROWER.
Page 88 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 6 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
4.8. LOAN FORGIVENESS
If the LOAN qualifies for LOAN Forgiveness, the percent of the LOAN balance that DOH will forgive at PROJECT
completion is stated in the Declarations. DOH calculates the amount forgiven when DOH approves the
BORROWER’s Project Completion Report. The amount forgiven will be based on either the LOAN AMOUNT or
BORROWER’s ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS, whichever is less, and accrued interest.
4.9. RELEASE OF LOAN FUNDS AND REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
DOH will release LOAN funds to BORROWER to reimburse BORROWER for eligible PROJECT costs. To request
reimbursement, BORROWER must submit a signed and completed invoice using a form provided by DOH. The
invoice must reference the PROJECT activity performed, and include supporting documentation such as bills,
invoices, receipts, and documentation of compliance with CONTRACT requirements as requested by DOH. The
invoice must signed by an official of BORROWER with authority to bind BORROWER.
Invoices must also include a report of the progress made since the last invoice, and the PROJECT status to date.
DOH will not release funds until the PROJECT status report and documentation are approved by DOH. Approval
will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. After approving the invoice, documentation, and PROJECT status
report, DOH will release funds to BORROWER within thirty (30) days, if BORROWER is not in alleged or actual
breach of CONTRACT.
DOH will withhold ten percent (10%) of LOAN funds until DOH confirms that BORROWER has successfully
completed all steps for PROJECT COMPLETION. The 10% holdback will be available to BORROWER as part of
the last LOAN disbursement.
4.10. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
BORROWER will begin the activities in the PROJECT within thirty (30) calendar days of the CONTRACT start date.
BORROWER will issue a ‘Notice to Proceed’, after the formal award of a construction contract, within eighteen (18)
months of the CONTRACT start date.
BORROWER must reach PROJECT COMPLETION within the TIME OF PERFORMANCE. If there are extenuating
circumstances, BORROWER may request, in writing, at least ninety (90) calendar days prior to the PROJECT
COMPLETION that DOH extend the deadline for PROJECT COMPLETION. At its discretion, DOH may issue an
extension. DOH’s decision is final and not subject to the dispute clause.
If BORROWER does not meet the requirements of this section, it is a breach of CONTRACT, and DOH may
terminate or suspend this CONTRACT.
4.11. PROJECT COMPLETION AMENDMENT AND THE PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT
The PROJECT Completion Amendment determines the final LOAN AMOUNT and LOAN TERM. When activities in
the PROJECT are complete, BORROWER will start the process for the PROJECT Completion Amendment by
sending DOH the PROJECT Completion Report. In the PROJECT Completion Report., BORROWER will provide
the following information to DOH:
A. A statement of the actual dollar amount spent, from all fund sources, to complete the PROJECT.
B. A statement that all ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS have been incurred. Costs are incurred when goods and
services are received and/or contracted work is performed.
C. Evidence showing BORROWER’S compliance with financial the audit requirements of this CONTRACT.
D. An invoice for the remaining ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS.
E. Documentation of BORROWER’s compliance with National Historic Preservation Act, 54 USC Subtitle III.
4.12. LOAN PAYMENTS
BORROWER must begin repaying the LOAN no later than one (1) year after the CONTRACT start date. Payments
are due on the first day of the month(s) shown as the PAYMENT MONTH(S) in the Declarations. Payments are
Page 89 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 7 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
principal and interest accrued up to the PAYMENT MONTH(S).
BORROWER can repay in full the LOAN balance, including fees and repayment of LOAN FUNDS for ineligible project
costs (if any), at any time or make accelerated payments without penalty. The final payment must be on or before the
end of the LOAN TERM.
4.13. LOAN DEFAULT
DOH must receive BORROWER’S payment within thirty (30) calendar days of the due date. Late payments are
delinquent and assessed a monthly penalty on the first (1st) day past the due date. The penalty is one percent (1%)
of the late payment amount per month. Penalty and fees accrue interest at the rate stated as LOAN INTEREST in the
Declarations.
DOH may notify any other entity, creditors, or potential creditors of BORROWER’s delinquency. BORROWER is
responsible for all attorney fees and costs incurred by DOH in any action taken to enforce its rights under this section,
including in any alternative dispute resolution proceeding.
4.14. LOAN SECURITY
LOAN Security is only required if identified in the Declarations. In its sole discretion and if allowed under the EPA
regulations relevant to this Contract, DOH may subordinate its LOAN security to Borrower’s obligations under
existing or future bonds and notes. Nothing in this section releases BORROWER from the obligation to make LOAN
PAYMENTS when due, and to adjust rates, fees, or surcharges as necessary to meet its obligations under this
CONTRACT.
4.15. AMENDMENTS, MODIFICATIONS, ASSIGNMENTS, AND WAIVERS
Amendments, modifications, assignments, and waivers to any of the terms of this CONTRACT supersede, if
applicable, those terms as found in the original CONTRACT, and are not binding unless they are in writing and
signed by representatives authorized to bind each of the parties. Only the authorized representative or their
designee has the express, implied, or apparent authority to alter, amend, assign, modify, or waive any terms of this
CONTRACT.
Neither this CONTRACT nor any claim arising under it may be transferred or assigned by BORROWER without DOH’s
prior written consent. During the LOAN TERM, DOH must approve in advance, any change in ownership of the
water system(s) improved with LOAN FUNDS. DOH may require the LOAN, including fees and ineligible project
costs (if any), be paid in full as a condition of approval.
Nothing in this CONTRACT may be waived unless approved by DOH in writing. No waiver of any default or breach is
implied from any failure to take action upon such default or breach if the default of breach persists or repeats. Waiver
of any default or breach is not a waiver of any subsequent default or breach.
4.16. BUILD AMERICA, BUY AMERICA
None of the LOAN funds can be used for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public water
system or treatment works unless all of the iron and steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used
in the project to be produced in the United States (“Build America, Buy America Requirements”) including iron and
steel, manufactured products, and construction materials provided by the Contactor pursuant to this Agreement.
The Contractor hereby represents and warrants to and for the benefit of the Owner and Funding authority.
DOH may waive this requirement if:
A. Compliance would be inconsistent with the public interest; or
B. The particular products are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities
and are not of a satisfactory quality; or
C. Inclusion of products produced in the United States will increase the cost of the overall project by more than
twenty-five (25) percent; and
D. A waiver is approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Page 90 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 8 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
BORROWER must submit the waiver request to DOH, which will submit it to EPA. The full text of the Build America,
Buy America provision can be found under The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act ("IIJA"), Pub. L. No. 117-58,
which includes the Build America, Buy America Act ("the Act"). Pub. L. No. 117-58, §§ 70901-52.
4.17. ATTORNEYS’ FEES
Unless expressly stated under another section of the CONTRACT, each party agrees to bear its own attorneys’ fees
and costs for litigation or other action brought to enforce the contract terms.
4.18. BONUS AND COMMISSION PAYMENTS NOT ALLOWED
Funds provided under this CONTRACT cannot be used to pay any bonus or commission to gain approval of the
loan application or any other approval under this CONTRACT. This section does not prohibit paying for bona fide
technical consultants, managerial, or other such services, if payment is for ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS.
4.19. COMPLIANCE
BORROWER will comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, requirements, and ordinances for the
design, implementation, and administration of the PROJECT and this CONTRACT, including but not limited to those
stated in the CONTRACT attachments. BORROWER will provide DOH with documentation of compliance, if
requested.
In the event of BORROWER’s alleged or actual noncompliance with any part of this CONTRACT, DOH may
suspend all or part of the CONTRACT, withhold payments, or prohibit BORROWER from incurring additional
obligations of LOAN FUNDS during the investigation and pending corrective action by BORROWER, or a decision
by DOH to terminate the CONTRACT.
4.20. DISPUTES
Except as otherwise provided in this CONTRACT, when a dispute arises between the parties that cannot be solved
by direct negotiation, either party may request a dispute hearing with the Director of the Office of Drinking Water
(the Director), who may designate a neutral person to decide the dispute. The parties will be equally responsible for
any reasonable costs and fees incurred by the neutral.
The party requesting a dispute hearing must:
A. Be in writing;
B. State the disputed issues;
C. State the relative positions of the parties;
D. State BORROWER's name, address, and the CONTRACT number;
E. Provide contact information for the requester’s representative , and,
F. Be mailed to the other party’s (respondent’s) Contract Manager within three (3) working days after the parties
agree that they cannot resolve the dispute.
The respondent must send a written answer within five (5) working days.
In the alternative, the parties can agree to submit a mutual request to the Director, which should include each
party’s response to the other party’s characterization of the dispute.
The Director or designee will review the written statements and reply in writing to both parties within ten (10)
working days. The Director or designee may extend this period if necessary by notifying the parties. The decision on
the dispute is non-binding and is not admissible in any succeeding judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding.
This non-binding dispute process must precede any action in a judicial or quasi-judicial tribunal. Nothing in this
CONTRACT limits the parties from using any mutually acceptable alternate dispute resolution (ADR) method in
addition to or instead of the dispute hearing procedure outlined above.
4.21. ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS
BORROWER will comply with Attachment VI: DWSRF Eligible Project Costs and is responsible for any audit
exceptions or disallowed costs incurred by its own organization or that of its subcontractors.
Page 91 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 9 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
The purchase of any land necessary for the PROJECT must be included in the PROJECT and be documented with
an appraisal or equivalent market evaluation, if approved by DOH, and a valid purchase and sale agreement.
Construction expenses incurred after the date shown as earliest date for construction reimbursement in the
Declarations are eligible for reimbursement. Requests for reimbursements for costs related to construction activities
will not be accepted until BORROWER has met the following conditions:
A. Completed the State Environmental Review Process (SEPA Review under RCW 43.21C);
B. Complied with all provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act, 54 USC Subtitle III;
C. Complied with Prevailing Wage requirements;
D. Received approval from DOH of the project report and related construction documents for all applicable
activities described in the PROJECT; and
E. Complied with any other LOAN conditions required by DOH.
BORROWER cannot use LOAN FUNDS for any expenses charged by BORROWER against any other contract,
subcontract, or source of funds.
If DOH reimburses BORROWER for costs that are later determined by DOH to be ineligible, BORROWER must
repay these funds to DOH no later than when the BORROWER returns the PROJECT Completion Amendment to
DOH. Prior to final completion, DOH may withhold payment for such costs as allowed under Section 4.36
RECAPTURE. Repayment is subject to interest retroactive to the date of the applicable disbursement by DOH.
4.22. FALSE, INCORRECT, OR INCOMPLETE INFORMATION OR CLAIM
BORROWER warrants that they have not and will not submit to DOH any information that is materially false,
incorrect, or incomplete. Providing false, fictitious, or misleading information with respect to the receipt and
disbursements of LOAN funds is a basis for criminal, civil, or administrative fines and/or penalties. DOH may also
pursue applicable remedies for violations by BORROWER of this section.
4.23. FINANCIAL AUDIT
DOH may require BORROWER to obtain an audit of this PROJECT conforming to Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP). BORROWER will maintain its records and accounts to facilitate the audit. BORROWER is
responsible for correcting any audit findings. BORROWER is responsible for any audit findings incurred by its own
organization and/or its subcontractors. DOH reserves the right to recover from BORROWER all disallowed costs
and INELEGIBLE PROJECT COSTS resulting from the audit.
The audit must include a report on compliance, including an opinion (or disclaimer of opinion) about whether the
BORROWER is in compliance with laws, regulations and requirements of this CONTRACT that could have a direct
and material effect on DOH.
BORROWER must send a copy of any required audit per 2 CFR §200.512 to the DOH Contract Manager, no later
than nine (9) months after the end of BORROWER’s fiscal year(s). BORROWER must send any audit corrective
action plan for audit findings and a copy of the management letter, within three (3) months of the audit report.
4.24. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE
This CONTRACT shall be construed and interpreted according to the laws of the state of Washington, and the
venue of any action brought under the CONTRACT will be in the Superior Court for Thurston County.
4.25. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL REQUIREMENTS
BORROWER will not conduct or authorize destructive PROJECT planning activities before completing the
requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act, 54 USC Subtitle III. BORROWER will not begin construction
activities, ground disturbance, or excavation of any sort, until BORROWER has complied with all requirements of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended.
If historical or cultural artifacts are discovered during the PROJECT, BORROWER will immediately stop
construction and implement reasonable measures to protect the discovery site from further disturbance, take
Page 92 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 10 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
reasonable steps to ensure confidentiality of the discovery site, restrict access to the site, and notify the concerned
tribe’s cultural staff or committee, Tribal Historical Preservation Officer (THPO), DOH Contract Manager, and the
State's Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO) at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic
Preservation (DAHP). If human remains are uncovered, BORROWER will report the presence and location of the
remains to the local coroner and law enforcement immediately, then contact the concerned tribe’s cultural staff or
committee, DOH Contract Manager, and DAHP.
BORROWER is legally and financially responsible for compliance with all laws, regulations, and agreements related
to the preservation of historical or cultural sites and artifacts and will hold harmless the state of Washington and
DOH in relation to any claim related to historical or cultural sites discovered, disturbed, or damaged as a result of
BORROWER’S and BORROWER’s subcontractors activities.
BORROWER will include the requirements of this section in all contracts for work or services related to the
PROJECT. BORROWER will require that bid documents include an inadvertent discovery plan that meets the
requirements of this section.
4.26. INDEMNIFICATION
BORROWER agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless DOH and the state of Washington for claims arising
out of or incident to BORROWER’S or any BORROWER’S subcontractor’s performance or failure to perform the
CONTRACT. BORROWER’S obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless DOH and the state of Washington
shall not be eliminated or reduced by any actual or alleged concurrent negligence of DOH or its agents, agencies,
employees and officials. BORROWER’S obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless DOH and the state of
Washington includes any claim by BORROWER’S agents, employees, officers, subcontractors or subcontractor
employees.
BORROWER waives immunity under Title 51 RCW to the extent it is required to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless the state and its agencies, officers, agents or employees.
4.27. INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE COVERAGE
BORROWER will comply with the applicable parts of Title 51 RCW, Industrial Insurance. If BORROWER fails to
provide industrial insurance coverage or fails to pay premiums or penalties on behalf of its employees as required
by law, DOH may collect from BORROWER the full amount payable to the Industrial Insurance Accident Fund.
DOH may deduct the amount owed by BORROWER to the accident fund from the amount payable to BORROWER
by DOH under this CONTRACT, and transmit the deducted amount to the Washington State Department of Labor
and Industries (L&I).
4.28. LITIGATION
BORROWER warrants that there is no threatened or pending litigation, investigation, or legal action before any
court, arbitrator, or administrative agency that, if adversely determined against BORROWER, would have a
materially adverse effect on BORROWER’s ability to repay the LOAN. BORROWER agrees to promptly notify DOH
if any above-referenced actions become known to BORROWER during the pendency of the Contract.
4.29. NONDISCRIMINATION
BORROWER will not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, color, national origin, families with children, sex,
marital status, sexual orientation, age, honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any
sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a person with a
disability in the performance of this CONTRACT. BORROWER will comply with all federal and state
nondiscrimination laws, including, but not limited to Chapter 49.60 RCW, Washington’s Law Against Discrimination
and 42 USC 12101 et seq., the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and 40 CFR Part 33 Participation by
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in US EPA Programs . Failure by BORROWER to carry out these
requirements is a material breach of this CONTRACT. BORROWER is required to include these non-discriminatory
provisions in any contract with a subcontractor.
4.30. PREVAILING WAGE
BORROWER will assure that all contractors and subcontractors performing work funded through this CONTRACT
comply with prevailing wage laws by paying the higher of state or federal prevailing wages. BORROWER is legally
and financially responsible for compliance with the prevailing wage requirements. BORROWER should consult the
Page 93 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 11 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
United States Department of Labor and Washington State Department of Labor and Industries websites to determine
the federal and State prevailing wages that must be paid.
4.31. PROCUREMENT
BORROWER will comply with all procurement requirements for subcontracting for the PROJECT and for obtaining
PROJECT-related goods and services. BORROWER must maintain records to verify compliance with procurement
requirements.
BORROWER must ensure that all contractors, subcontractors, engineers, vendors, and any other entity for work or
services listed in the PROJECT will insert in full, in any contract, the labor standards provisions in Attachment VIII:
Labor Standard Provisions for Subrecipients That Are Governmental Entities.
4.32. PROHIBITION STATEMENT
Per Section 106 of the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act, BORROWER `s contractors, subcontractors,
engineers, vendors, and any other entity performing work funded by this CONTRACT must comply with and include
the following terms and conditions in all contracts for work or services for the PROJECT.
“All forms of trafficking in persons, illegal sex trade, or forced labor practices are prohibited in the performance
of this award or subawards under the award, or in any manner during the period of time that the award is in
effect. This prohibition applies to you as the recipient, your employees, subrecipients under this award, and
subrecipients’ employees.”
4.33. PROJECT SIGNS
If BORROWER displays, during the TIME OF PERFORMANCE, any signs or markers identifying parties that are
providing funds for the PROJECT, BORROWER must include the Washington State Department of Health Drinking
Water State Revolving Fund and the Washington State Department of Health as participants in the PROJECT.
4.34. PUBLICITY
BORROWER agrees to get prior written consent from DOH’s Contract Manager before publishing or using any
advertising or publicity materials that include Washington State or DOH’s name, or includes language that may
reasonably infer or imply a connection with either one.
4.35. RATES AND RESERVES
BORROWER will maintain reserves at a minimum as required by the Water System Plan or Small Water System
Management Plan. BORROWER will timely adopt rate increases and/or capital assessments for the system’s
services to provide sufficient funds, along with other revenues of the system, to pay all operating expenses and debt
repayments during the LOAN TERM.
4.36. RECAPTURE
DOH reserves the right to recapture from BORROWER sufficient funds to compensate DOH for BORROWER’s
noncompliance with any part of this CONTRACT, in addition to any other remedies available under the
CONTRACT, at law, or in equity. DOH may withhold LOAN FUNDS from BORROWER to recapture such funds.
4.37. RECORDKEEPING AND ACCESS TO RECORDS
DOH, its agents, and authorized officials of the state and federal governments will have full access and the right to
examine, copy, excerpt, or transcribe, at no additional cost and at all reasonable times, any pertinent documents,
papers, records, and books of BORROWER and of persons, firms, or organizations with which BORROWER may
contract, involving transactions related to this CONTRACT. BORROWER agrees to keep complete records of its
compliance with this CONTRACT for a period of six (6) years from the date that the debt to DOH is paid in full. This
includes but is not limited to financial reports. If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the
six (6) year period, BORROWER must keep the records until all litigation, claims or audit findings involving the
records have been resolved. These records retention requirements are in addition to the local government records
retention schedules applicable to the BORROWER.
Page 94 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 12 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
4.38. REGISTRATION WITH THE SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM)
BORROWER must comply with 48 CFR 52.204-7 to register with the System for Awards Management (SAM.gov).
BORROWER is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of its data in the SAM database and any liability
resulting from the Government or DOH reliance on inaccurate or incomplete data in it. BORROWER must remain
registered in the SAM database. BORROWER should annually review its information in SAM to ensure it is
accurate and complete.
4.39. SEVERABILITY
If any part of this CONTRACT or part of any document incorporated by reference is found to be invalid, it will not
affect the other parts of this CONTRACT that can be given effect without the invalid part.
4.40. SUBCONTRACTING
Prior to awarding contracts and/or subcontracts, BORROWER must verify that the complete names of both the
selected contractor and the owner or president are not in the Federal Excluded Parties List System for Ineligible
Professionals and Debarred Contractors (www.SAM.gov). BORROWER must provide the DOH Contract Manager
with a screen printout documenting that neither the firm, the owner or the president are excluded.
BORROWER will ensure that every contract and subcontract awarded for the PROJECT after the CONTRACT start
date will bind the parties to follow all applicable terms of this CONTRACT. BORROWER is responsible to DOH for
noncompliance by its contractors and/or subcontractors. BORROWER’s contracts or subcontracts do not release or
reduce the BORROWER’s liability to DOH for any breach in the performance of BORROWER’s duties.
BORROWER’s contracts and subcontracts must include a term that the state of Washington and DOH are not liable
for claims or damages arising from a contractor and/or subcontractor’s performance or lack thereof.
4.41. SURVIVAL
The CONTRACT’s terms, conditions, and warranties that by its sense and context are intended to survive the
completion of the performance, cancellation or termination of this CONTRACT, shall so survive.
4.42. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE
If DOH concludes that BORROWER has failed to comply with the CONTRACT requirements or has otherwise
breached one or more parts of the CONTRACT, DOH may, at its discretion, upon notice to BORROWER, terminate
or suspend the CONTRACT and/or its attached agreements in whole or in part.
The notice will be in writing and state the reason(s) for termination or suspension, and the effective date. The
effective date will be determined by DOH. The notice will allow BORROWER at least thirty (30) business days to
cure the breach, if curable. If the breach is not cured or cannot be cured within thirty (30) business days, the
outstanding balance of the LOAN, with any interest accrued and other costs as authorized by the CONTRACT shall
be due and payable to DOH.
If DOH terminates this CONTRACT under this section, DOH is liable only for payment required under the terms of
this CONTRACT for ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS incurred prior to the effective date of termination.
At DOH’s discretion, the termination for cause may be deemed a termination for convenience if DOH determines
that the default or failure to perform was outside BORROWER’s control, fault or negligence. The rights and
remedies of DOH provided in this CONTRACT are not exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and
remedies provided by law. Nothing in this section affects BORROWER’s obligations to immediately repay the
unpaid balance of the LOAN as prescribed in the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 246-296-150.
4.43. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION FOR CONVENIENCE
If funding or appropriation from state, federal, or other sources is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way during
the TIME OF PERFORMANCE, DOH may:
A. Delay or suspend releasing LOAN FUNDS until funding or appropriation are available to DOH; or
B. Amend the CONTRACT to reflect the new funding limitations and conditions; or
Page 95 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 13 of 32 DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
C. Terminate the CONTRACT and/or its attached agreements, in whole or in part; or
D. Suspend the CONTRACT and/or its attached agreements, in whole or in part.
If DOH terminates the CONTRACT and/or its attached agreements in whole or in part, under this section, DOH will
notify BORROWER’s representative in writing of the reason(s) for termination, and the effective date. The effective
date will be determined by DOH.
DOH may choose to suspend this CONTRACT and/or its attached agreements in whole or in part, if DOH
determines that the funding insufficiency will likely be resolved in time for BORROWER to resume activities prior to
the end of the TIME OF PERFORMANCE. DOH will notify BORROWER’s representative by facsimile or email of
the reason(s) for suspension, and the effective date. DOH will determine the effective date. BORROWER must
suspend performance on the effective date of the suspension. During the period of suspension each party must
notify the other party’s representative of any conditions that may reasonably affect its ability to resume performance.
During the suspension, when DOH determines that the funding insufficiency is resolved, DOH may notify
BORROWER’s representative of the proposed date to resume performance. BORROWER must respond to DOH’s
representative in writing, within five (5) business days of DOH sending notice, as to whether it can resume
performance on that date or offer an alternative date to resume performance. If BORROWER cannot resume
performance or the alternative date is not acceptable to DOH, the parties agree the CONTRACT will be deemed
terminated for convenience, retroactive to the original date of suspension.
If DOH terminates or suspends this CONTRACT, DOH is liable only for payment required under the terms of this
CONTRACT for eligible project costs incurred prior to the effective date of suspension or termination. Nothing in
this section shall affect Contractor’s obligations to repay the unpaid balance of the LOAN. Nothing in this section
affects BORROWER’s obligation to repay the LOAN, including fees and other expenses as allowed by the
CONTRACT.
4.44. TERMINATION PROCEDURES
When BORROWER receives Notice of Termination or on the date a suspension is converted to a termination,
except as otherwise directed by DOH, BORROWER will:
A. Stop work under the CONTRACT on the date, and to the extent specified, in the notice;
B. Place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, services, or facilities related to the CONTRACT;
C. If expressly requested by DOH, assign to DOH any or all of the rights, title, and interest of BORROWER under
the orders and subcontracts so terminated, in which case DOH has the right, at its discretion, to settle or pay
any or all claims arising out of the termination of such orders and subcontracts. Any attempt by BORROWER
to settle such claims must have the prior written approval of DOH; and
D. Preserve and transfer any materials, CONTRACT deliverables and/or DOH property in BORROWER’s
possession as directed by DOH.
Upon termination of this CONTRACT, DOH will pay BORROWER for amounts due under the CONTRACT prior to
the date of termination unless such payment is precluded under any other provision of this CONTRACT. DOH may
withhold any amount due as DOH reasonably determines is necessary to protect DOH against potential loss or
liability resulting from the termination. DOH will pay any withheld amount to BORROWER if DOH later determines
that loss or liability will not occur.
4.45. WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS
If this CONTRACT exceeds $100,000, BORROWER must comply with the applicable Contract Work Hours and
Safety Standards Act (40 USC Chapter 37). These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or
materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of
intelligence.
Page 96 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 14 of 32 Attachment I: Scope of Work
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal)
ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK (PROJECT)
#2023-4226 DWSRF PROGRAM DWL29303-0
CONSTRUCTION LOAN CONTRACT INFORMATION
CITY OF PASCO, WEST PASCO WTP IMPROVEMENTS PHASES 3 & 4
DWSRF Scope of Work Form:
Scope of Work:
Project to include:
1. Submit project report and construction drawings to Eastern Regional Office for review and approval.
Submit approval letter.
2. Submit bid documents to Eastern Regional Office for review and approval. Submit approval letter.
3. Complete SEPA and submit determination and publication affidavit.
4. Install two strainers, two membrane racks, cyanotoxin treatment system, and backwash recovery
system, and expand the residual recovery system to connect to the existing water system.
5. Add two 3 MGD pumps and one 6 MGD pump with piping, electrical, instrumentation, and control
systems to connect to the existing water system.
In addition to costs of construction, costs may include (but are not limited to): engineering, design, construction
inspection, hydrogeologic assessment, permits, public involvement, preparation of bid documents, fees, taxes, legal,
administrative and audit.
Page 97 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 15 of 32 Attachment I: Scope of Work
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal)
APPLICATION #2023-4226, CITY OF PASCO, WEST PASCO WTP IMPROVEMENTS PHASES 3 & 4
Project Costs by Cost Category:
COST CATEGORY CURRENT ESTIMATES
Engineering Report (Preliminary Engineering) $150,000
Environmental Review $25,000
Historical Review/Cultural Review $15,000
Land/ROW Acquisition $0
Permits $50,000
Public Involvement/Information $10,000
Bid Documents (Design Engineering) $600,000
Construction: Estimated Cost. Provide details on following pages. $7,890,000
Contingency: (10% min, 20% max) $1,578,000
DOH Review/Approval Fees: $12,000
Sales or Use Taxes $1,100,000
Construction Engineering/Inspection $560,000
Insurance: $0
Audit: $10,000
Legal: $0
Service Meters (Purchase and Installation) $0
Other: $0
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS (before Loan Fee) $12,000,000
DWSRF Loan Origination Fee (1%) $0
DWSRF Loan Award $12,000,000
Page 98 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 16 of 32 Attachment I: Scope of Work
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal)
APPLICATION #2023-4226, CITY OF PASCO, WEST PASCO WTP IMPROVEMENTS PHASES 3 & 4
Project Funding:
TYPE OF FUNDING SOURCE CURRENT STATUS
Grants and Other Non-Matching Funds
Grant #1 $
Grant #2 $
Other Grants $
New Grants $
Total Grants and Other Non-Matching Funds a) $
Loans
This Loan Request DWSRF loan DWL29303-0 $12,000,000
Other Loan #1 DWSRF loan DWL29708-0 $1,178,943
Other Loan #2 $
Other Loans $
New Loans $
Total Loans b) $13,178,943
Local Revenue
Source #1 $
Source #2 $
Other Local Revenue $
New Local Revenue $
Total Local Revenue c) $
Other Funds
Other Funds $
Other Funds $
Total Other Funds d) $
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING e) $13,178,943
Page 99 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 17 of 32 Attachment I: Scope of Work
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal)
APPLICATION #2023-4226, CITY OF PASCO, WEST PASCO WTP IMPROVEMENTS PHASES 3 & 4
Engineer’s Certification:
The term of this loan will be based on an engineer’s certification of the expected useful life of the improvements, as stated
below, or 20 years, whichever is less. If the jurisdiction prefers the term of its loan to be less than either 20 years or the
useful life of the improvements, the preferred loan term should be indicated here: __ years.
I, _______________________, licensed engineer, certify that the average expected useful life for the improvements
described above is __ years.
Signed: ____________________________
Name: ____________________________
Date: ____________________________
Telephone: ____________________________
Professional Engineer License Number: _____________
Page 100 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 18 of 32 Attachment I: Scope of Work
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal)
ATTACHMENT II: ATTORNEY’S CERTIFICATION
DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND
(MUNICIPAL)
I, ________________________________________________, hereby certify:
I am an attorney at law admitted to practice in the state of Washington and the duly appointed attorney of BORROWER
identified in the Declarations of the Contract identified above; and
I have also examined any and all documents and records, which are pertinent to the Contract, including the application
requesting this financial assistance.
Based on the foregoing, it is my opinion that:
1. BORROWER is a public body, properly constituted and operating under the laws of the State of Washington,
empowered to receive and expend federal, state and local funds, to contract with the state of Washington, and to
receive and expend the funds involved to accomplish the objectives set forth in its application.
2. BORROWER is empowered to accept the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund financial assistance and to
provide for repayment of the loan as set forth in the loan agreement.
3. There is currently no litigation in existence seeking to enjoin the commencement or completion of the above-
described public facilities project or to enjoin BORROWER from repaying the Drinking Water State Revolving
Fund loan extended by DOH with respect to such project. BORROWER is not a party to litigation, which will
materially affect its ability to repay such loan on the terms contained in the loan agreement.
4. Assumption of this obligation would not exceed statutory and administrative rule debt limitations applicable to
BORROWER.
__________________________________ _____________________________
Signature of Attorney Date
__________________________________
Name and BAR Number (WSBA No.)
_______________________________________________________________________
Address
Page 101 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 19 of 32 Attachment III: Federal and State Requirements
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
ATTACHMENT III: FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS
(NOT ALL INCLUSIVE)
1) Environmental and Cultural Authorities
a) Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974, Public Law 86-523 as amended
b) Clean Air Act, Public Law 84-159 as amended
c) Coastal Zone Management Act, Public Law 92-583 as amended
d) Endangered Species Act, Public Law 93-205 as amended
e) Environmental Justice, Executive Order 12898
f) Floodplain Management, Executive Order 11988 as amended by Executive Order 12148
g) Protection of Wetlands, Executive Order 11990
h) Farmland Protection Policy Act, Public Law 97-98
i) Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, Public Law 85-624 as amended
j) National Historic Preservation Act, 54 USC Subtitle III
k) Safe Drinking Water Act, Public Law 93-523 as amended
l) Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, Public Law 90-542 as amended
m) Washington State Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW
n) Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, Archaeological Resources Protection Act, Revised Code
of Washington (RCW) 27.44 regarding Indian Graves and Records; RCW 27.53 regarding Archaeological Sites and
Resources; RCW 68.60 regarding Abandoned and Historic Cemeteries and Historic Graves; and Washington
Administrative Code (WAC) 25-48 regarding Archaeological Excavation and Removal Permits. Buy America Build America Requirements
2) DWSRF construction projects chosen for FFATA/Equivalency reporting must comply with the Buy America Build
America provisions. Projects started prior to May 14, 2022, may be exempt. Visit the EPA website for more
information on the BABA requirements and the waiver process at https://www.epa.gov/cwsrf/build-america-buy-
america-baba
3) Economic and Miscellaneous Authorities
a) Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1996, Public Law 89-754 as amended, Executive
Order 12372
b) Procurement Prohibitions under Section 306 of the Clean air Act and Section 508 of the Clean Water Act,
including Executive Order 11738, Administration of the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Ac
with Respect to Federal Contracts, Grants, or Loans
c) Uniform Relocation and Real Property Policies Act, Public Law 91-646 as amended
d) Debarment and Suspension, Executive Order 12549
e) H.R. 3547, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014.
4) Social Policy Authorities
a) Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Public Law 94-135
b) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352
c) Section 13 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Public Law 92-500 (the Clean Water
Act)
d) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Public Law 93-112 (including Executive Orders 11914 and 11250)
e) Equal Employment Opportunity, Executive Order 11246
f) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Public Law 101-549 (the Clean Air Act), and Public Law 102-389 (the Clean
Water Act)
g) Section 129 of the Small Business Administration Reauthorization and Amendment Act of 1988, Public Law 100-
590
h) Chapter 49.60 RCW, Washington’s Law against Discrimination, and 42 USC 12101 et seq. the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA).
i) The Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 USC 327-333)-Where applicable.
j) The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA), 42 USC s. 2000ff et seq.
5) State Laws
a) Chapter 36.70A RCW, Growth Management Act
b) Chapter 39.80 RCW, Contracts for Architectural and Engineering Services
c) Chapter 39.12 RCW, Washington State Public Works Act
d) Chapter 43.20 RCW, State Department of Health of Health
Page 102 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 20 of 32 Attachment III: Federal and State Requirements
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
e) Chapter 43.70 RCW, Department of Health
f) Chapter 43.155 RCW, Public Works Project
g) Chapter 70.116 RCW, Public Water Systems Coordination Act of 1977
h) Chapter 70.119 RCW, Public Water Supply Systems Certification and Regulation of Operations
i) Chapter 70.119A RCW, Public Water Systems, Penalties & Compliances
j) Chapter 246-290 WAC, Group A Public Water Systems
k) Chapter 246-291 WAC, Group B Public Water Systems
l) Chapter 246-292 WAC, Waterworks Operator Certification Regulations
m) Chapter 246-293 WAC, Water Systems Coordination Act
n) Chapter 246-294 WAC, Drinking Water Operating Permits
o) Chapter 246-295 WAC, Satellite System Management Agencies
p) Chapter 246-296 WAC Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan Program
q) Chapter 173-160 WAC, Minimum Standards for Construction & Maintenance of Wells
r) Title 173 WAC, Department of Ecology Rules
s) Title 40 Part 141 Code of Federal Regulations, Federal National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (Section
Adopted by Reference)
Page 103 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 21 of 32 Attachment IV: DBE Requirements
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
ATTACHMENT IV: DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
REQUIREMENTS
GENERAL COMPLIANCE, 40 CFR, Part 33
BORROWER must comply with the requirements of Environmental Protection Agency's Program for Utilization of Small,
Minority and Women's Business Enterprises (MBE/WBE) in procurement under this Contract, contained in 40 CFR, Part
33. BORROWER will use the directory of certified firms available through the Washington State Office of Minority and
Women’s Business Enterprises to meet the requirements.
FAIR SHARE OBJECTIVES, 40 CFR, Part 33, Subpart D
The following are exemptions from the fair share objective Requirements:
• Grant and loan recipients receiving a total of $250K or less in EPA financial assistance in a given fiscal year.
• Tribal recipients of Performance Partnership Eligible grants under 40 CFR Part 35, Subpart B.
o There is a 3-year phase in period for the requirement to negotiate fair share goals for Tribal and Insular
Area recipients.
• Recipients of Technical Assistance Grants.
The Fair Share Objectives or goals for the utilization of disadvantaged businesses negotiated with EPA by the WA Office
of Minority Women Business are stated below.
Construction 10% MBE 6% WBE
Supplies 8% MBE 4% WBE
Equipment 8% MBE 4% WBE
Purchased Services 10% MBE 4% WBE
BORROWER must accept the fair share objectives/goals stated above and purchase the same or similar construction,
supplies, services and equipment, in the same or similar relevant geographic buying market as WA Office of Minority
Women Business goals.
SIX GOOD FAITH EFFORTS, 40 CFR, Part 33, Subpart C
Pursuant to 40 CFR, Section 33.301, BORROWER will make the following good faith efforts whenever procuring
construction, equipment, services and supplies under an EPA financial assistance agreement, and to ensure that sub-
recipients, loan recipients, and prime contractors also comply.
Records documenting compliance with the six good faith efforts shall be retained. The six good faith efforts shall include:
A. Ensure Disadvantaged Business Enterprises are made aware of contracting opportunities to the fullest extent
practicable through outreach and recruitment activities. For Indian Tribal, State and Local Government recipients,
this will include placing the Disadvantaged Business Enterprises on solicitation lists and soliciting them whenever
they are potential sources.
B. Make information on forthcoming opportunities available to Disadvantaged Business Enterprises and arrange time
frames for contracts and establish delivery schedules, where the requirements permit, in a way that encourages
and facilitates participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in the competitive process. This includes,
whenever possible, posting solicitations for bids or proposals for a minimum of thirty (30) calendar days before the
bid or proposal closing date.
C. Consider in the contracting process whether firms competing for large contracts could subcontract with
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. For Indian Tribal, State and Local Government recipients, this will include
dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum
participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in the competitive process.
D. Encourage contracting with a consortium of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises when a contract is too large for
one of these firms to handle individually.
E. Use the services and assistance of the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development
Agency of the Department of Health.
F. If the prime contractor awards subcontracts, also require the prime contractor to take the five good faith efforts in
paragraphs A through E above.
Page 104 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 22 of 32 Attachment IV: DBE Requirements
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
MBE/WBE REPORTING, 40 CFR, Part 33, Sections 33.502 and 33.503
BORROWER is required to submit MBE/WBE participation reports to DOH, on a quarterly basis, beginning with the
Federal fiscal year reporting period BORROWER receives the award and continuing until the project is completed.
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION PROVISIONS, 40 CFR, Section 33.302
BORROWER agrees to comply with the contract administration provisions of 40 CFR, Section 33.302.
BORROWER agrees to require all general contractors to provide forms: EPA Form 6100-2 DBE Subcontractor
Participation Form and EPA Form 6100-3 DBE Subcontractor Performance Form to all its Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise subcontractors, engineers, vendors, and any other entity for work or services listed in the PROJECT. These
two (2) forms may be obtained from the EPA Office of Small Business Program’s website on the internet at
http://www.epa.gov/osbp/grants.htm.
BORROWER agrees to require all general contractors to complete and submit to BORROWER and Environmental
Protection Agency EPA Form 6100-4 DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form beginning with the Federal fiscal year reporting
period BORROWER receives the award and continuing until the project is completed. Only procurements with certified
MBE/WBEs are counted toward a Contractor’s MBE/WBE accomplishments.
BIDDERS LIST, 40 CFR, Section 33.501(b) and (c)
BORROWER is also required to create and maintain a bidders list if BORROWER of the loan is subject to, or chooses to
follow, competitive bidding requirements. Please see 40 CFR, Section 33.501 (b) and (c) for specific requirements and
exemptions.
Section 33.501(b) of the rule is as follows:
A recipient of a Continuing Environmental Program Grant or other annual grant must create and maintain a bidders list. In
addition, a recipient of an EPA financial assistance agreement to capitalize a revolving loan fund also must require entities
receiving identified loans to create and maintain a bidders list if the recipient of the loan is subject to, or chooses to follow,
competitive bidding requirements. The purpose of a bidders list is to provide the recipient and entities receiving identified
loans who conduct competitive bidding with as accurate a database as possible about the universe of MBE/WBE and non-
MBE/WBE prime and subcontractors. The list must include all firms that bid or quote on prime contracts or bid or quote on
subcontracts under EPA assisted projects, including both MBE/WBEs.
The bidders list must be kept until the grant project period has expired and the recipient is no longer receiving EPA
funding under the grant. For entities receiving identified loans, the bidders list must be kept until the project period for the
identified loan has ended. The following information must be obtained from all prime and subcontractors:
(1) Entity’s name with point of contact;
(2) Entity’s mailing address, telephone number, and e-mail address;
(3) The procurement on which the entity bid or quoted, and when; and
(4) Entity’s status as a MBE/WBE 1 or non-MBE/WBE.
The exemption found at § 33.501(c) is as follows:
A recipient of an EPA financial assistance agreement in the amount of $250,000 or less for any single assistance
agreement, or of more than one financial assistance agreement with a combined total of $250,000 or less in any one fiscal
year, is exempt from the paragraph (b) of this section requirement to create and maintain a bidders list. Also, a recipient
under the CWSRF, DWSRF, or BCRLF Program is not required to apply the paragraph (b) of this section bidders list
requirement of this subpart to an entity receiving an identified loan in an amount of $250,000 or less, or to an entity
receiving more than one identified loan with a combined total of $250,000 or less in any one fiscal year. This exemption is
limited to the paragraph (b) of this section bidders list requirements of this subpart.
1 Qualified Women and Minority business enterprises may be found on the Internet at www.omwbe.wa.gov or by contacting the Washington State Office
of Minority and Women’s Enterprises at 360-704-1181.
Page 105 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 23 of 32 Attachment V: Certification Regarding Debarment
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
ATTACHMENT V: CERTIFICATION REGARDING
DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY
MATTERS
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460
EPA Project Control Number
The terms, “covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, person, primary covered
transaction, principal, and voluntarily excluded”, as used in this attachment, are defined in the rules implementing
Executive Order 12549, including 13 CFR § 400.109. You may contact DOH for help getting a copy of these regulations.
BORROWER, defined as the primary participant and it principals, certifies by signing below that to the best of its
knowledge and belief they:
A. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from
covered transactions by any Federal department or agency;
B. Have not within a three-year (3) period preceding this CONTRACT, been convicted of or had a civil judgment
against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or
performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal
or State antitrust statutes or embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making
false statements, tax evasion, receiving stolen property, making false claims, or obstruction of justice;
C. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (federal, state, or
local) with commission of any of the offenses described in this attachment; and,
D. Have not within a three-year period (3) preceding the signing of this CONTRACT had one or more public
transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
Prior to awarding contracts for the PROJECT, BORROWER must verify that neither the contractor’s business name(s) nor
the names of its principals are in the Federal Excluded Parties List System for Ineligible Professionals and Debarred
Contractors (www.SAM.gov). BORROWER must keep documentation in the PROJECT files and provide a copy to the
DOH Contract Manager.
BORROWER will include the language below without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all
solicitations for lower tier covered transactions:
The lower tier contractor certifies, by signing this CONTRACT that neither it nor its principals are
debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from
participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency.
I understand that a false statement on this certification may be ground for rejection of this proposal or termination of the
award. In addition, under 18 USC Sec. 1001, a false statement may result in a fine or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or
both.
Typed or Printed Name & Title of Authorized Representative
__________________________________________________________________
Signature of Authorized Representative Date
I am unable to certify to the above statements. My explanation is attached.
Page 106 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 24 of 32 Attachment VI: DWSRF Eligible Project Costs
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
ATTACHMENT VI: DWSRF ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS
Must be directly attributable to the project.
1. The costs for complying with the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970.
2. DWSRF loan fees.
3. The purchase of a portion of another system’s
capacity, if it is the most cost effective solution
(limited to publicly owned (municipal) systems).
4. Construction of reservoirs (clear wells) that are part
of the treatment process and are collocated with the
treatment facility.
5. Construction of distribution reservoirs (finished
water).
6. Cost associated with restructuring or consolidation of
existing water systems by publicly owned water
systems.
7. Main extensions to connect to safe and reliable
sources of drinking water.
8. Cost associated with collecting and preparing
environmental assessment documents to obtain local
permits.
9. Direct labor including related employee benefits:
a. Salaries and wages (at actual or average rates)
covering productive labor hours of employees of
the borrower (excluding the administrative
organization of the operating unit involved) for
periods of time actively or incidentally engaged
in pre-design engineering, design engineering,
construction engineering, acquisition of rights of
way, and the cleaning, sterilization or
bacteriological testing of water system
components prior to public use. The costs of
services rendered by employees generally
classified as administration/project management
of the loan are considered a direct cost only
when such employees are assigned the types of
services described above and shall be limited to
3% or less of the project loan amount.
b. Employee benefits relating to labor are
considered a direct cost of construction projects.
The following items may be included as
employee benefits:
• F.I.C.A. (Social Security) –employer’s share.
• Retirement benefits.
• Hospital, health, dental, and other welfare
insurance.
• Life insurance.
• Industrial and medical insurance.
• Vacation.
• Holiday.
• Sick leave.
• Military leave and jury duty.
Employee benefits must be calculated as a
percentage of direct labor dollars. The
computation of predetermined percentage rates
to be applied to current labor costs must be
based on the average of total employee benefits
and total labor costs for the prior fiscal year and
adjusted by known current year variations.
c. Other than work identified in Number 9.a, no
costs associated with labor performed by the
borrower’s employees, including force account
work, are eligible for financing assistance.
10. Contract engineering, planning, design, legal, and
financial planning services. The Department of
Health reserves the right to declare ineligible legal
costs that are unreasonable and disproportionate to
the project.
11. Contract construction work.
12. Direct vehicle and equipment charges at the actual
rental cost paid for the equipment or, in the case of
city or county-owned equipment, at the rental rates
established by the local government’s “equipment
rental and revolving fund” following the methods
prescribed by the division of municipal corporations.
However, such costs must be charged on a uniform
basis to equipment used for all projects regardless of
the source of funding. Cities with a population of
eight thousand or less not using this type of fund are
allowed the same rates as used by the State
Department of Transportation.
13. Direct materials and supplies.
14. Other direct costs incurred for materials or services
acquired for a specific project are eligible costs and
may include, but are not limited to such items as:
a. Telephone charges.
b. Reproduction and photogrammetry costs.
c. Video and photography for project
documentation.
d. Computer usage.
e. Printing and advertising.
15. Other project related costs include:
• Competitive Bidding.
• Audit.
• Insurance.
• Prevailing wages.
• Attorney fees.
• Environmental Review.
• Archaeological Survey.
Water system plan costs are not eligible for
reimbursement. Small water system management
program and plan amendments costs are eligible for
reimbursement.
Projects may be designed to accommodate reasonable
growth. This is generally the 20-year projection included
in the system’s water system plan or small water system
management program.
Page 107 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 25 of 32 Attachment VII: Labor Standards Provisions
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
ATTACHMENT VII: LABOR STANDARD PROVISIONS FOR
SUBRECIPIENTS THAT ARE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES
Wage Rate Requirements Under The Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (P.L. 113-6)
Preamble
With respect to the Clean Water and Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Funds, EPA provides capitalization grants to
each state which in turn provides subgrants or loans to eligible entities within the state. Typically, the subrecipients are
municipal or other local governmental entities that manage the funds. For these types of recipients, the provisions set
forth under Roman Numeral I, below, shall apply. Although EPA and the State remain responsible for ensuring
subrecipients’ compliance with the wage rate requirements set forth herein, those subrecipients shall have the primary
responsibility to maintain payroll records as described in Section 3(ii)(A), below and for compliance as described in
Section I-5.
Occasionally, the subrecipient may be a private for profit or not for profit entity. For these types of recipients, the
provisions set forth in Roman Numeral II, below, shall apply. Although EPA and the State remain responsible for ensuring
subrecipients’ compliance with the wage rate requirements set forth herein, those subrecipients shall have the primary
responsibility to maintain payroll records as described in Section II-3(ii)(A), below and for compliance as described in
Section II-5.
I. Requirements Under The Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (P.L. 113-6)
For Subrecipients That Are Governmental Entities:
The following terms and conditions specify how recipients will assist EPA in meeting its Davis-Bacon (DB) responsibilities
when DB applies to EPA awards of financial assistance under the FY 2013 Continuing Resolution with respect to State
recipients and subrecipients that are governmental entities. If a subrecipient has questions regarding when DB applies,
obtaining the correct DB wage determinations, DB provisions, or compliance monitoring, it may contact Department of
Health. If a State recipient needs guidance, they may obtain additional guidance from DOL’s web site at
http://www.dol.gov/whd/.
1. Applicability of the Davis- Bacon (DB) prevailing wage requirements.
Under the FY 2013 Continuing Resolution, DB prevailing wage requirements apply to the construction, alteration, and
repair of treatment works carried out in whole or in part with assistance made available by a State water pollution control
revolving fund and to any construction project carried out in whole or in part by assistance made available by a drinking
water treatment revolving loan fund. If a subrecipient encounters a unique situation at a site that presents uncertainties
regarding DB applicability, the subrecipient must discuss the situation with the recipient State before authorizing work on
that site.
2. Obtaining Wage Determinations.
(a) Subrecipients shall obtain the wage determination for the locality in which a covered activity subject to DB will take
place prior to issuing requests for bids, proposals, quotes or other methods for soliciting contracts (solicitation) for
activities subject to DB. These wage determinations shall be incorporated into solicitations and any subsequent contracts.
Prime contracts must contain a provision requiring that subcontractors follow the wage determination incorporated into the
prime contract.
(i) While the solicitation remains open, the subrecipient shall monitor www.wdol.gov weekly to ensure that the
wage determination contained in the solicitation remains current. The subrecipients shall amend the
solicitation if DOL issues a modification more than 10 days prior to the closing date (i.e. bid opening) for the
solicitation. If DOL modifies or supersedes the applicable wage determination less than 10 days prior to the
closing date, the subrecipients may request a finding from the State recipient that there is not a reasonable
time to notify interested contractors of the modification of the wage determination. The State recipient will
provide a report of its findings to the subrecipient.
(ii) If the subrecipient does not award the contract within 90 days of the closure of the solicitation, any
modifications or supersedes DOL makes to the wage determination contained in the solicitation shall be
effective unless the State recipient, at the request of the subrecipient, obtains an extension of the 90 day
period from DOL pursuant to 29 CFR 1.6(c) (3) (iv). The subrecipient shall monitor www.wdol.gov on a weekly
Page 108 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 26 of 32 Attachment VII: Labor Standards Provisions
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
basis if it does not award the contract within 90 days of closure of the solicitation to ensure that wage
determinations contained in the solicitation remain current.
(b) If the subrecipient carries out activity subject to DB by issuing a task order, work assignment or similar instrument to an
existing contractor (ordering instrument) rather than by publishing a solicitation, the subrecipient shall insert the appropriate
DOL wage determination from www.wdol.gov into the ordering instrument.
(c) Subrecipients shall review all subcontracts subject to DB entered into by prime contractors to verify that the prime
contractor has required its subcontractors to include the applicable wage determinations.
(d) As provided in 29 CFR 1.6(f), DOL may issue a revised wage determination applicable to a subrecipient’s contract
after the award of a contract or the issuance of an ordering instrument if DOL determines that the subrecipient has failed
to incorporate a wage determination or has used a wage determination that clearly does not apply to the contract or
ordering instrument. If this occurs, the subrecipient shall either terminate the contract or ordering instrument and issue a
revised solicitation or ordering instrument or incorporate DOL’s wage determination retroactive to the beginning of the
contract or ordering instrument by change order. The subrecipient’s contractor must be compensated for any increases in
wages resulting from the use of DOL’s revised wage determination.
3. Contract and Subcontract provisions.
(a) The Recipient shall insure that the subrecipient(s) shall insert in full in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is
entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a treatment work
under the CWSRF or a construction project under the DWSRF financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in
accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal
agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which
is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in § 5.1 or the FY 2013 Continuing Resolution, the
following clauses:
(1) Minimum wages.
(i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work will be paid unconditionally and not less
often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as
are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of
wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than
those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof,
regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and
mechanics.
Contributions made or costs reasonably anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits under section 1(b)(2) of the Davis-Bacon
Act on behalf of laborers or mechanics are considered wages paid to such laborers or mechanics, subject to the
provisions of paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of this section; also, regular contributions made or costs incurred for more than a weekly
period (but not less often than quarterly) under plans, funds, or programs which cover the particular weekly period, are
deemed to be constructively made or incurred during such weekly period. Such laborers and mechanics shall be paid the
appropriate wage rate and fringe benefits on the wage determination for the classification of work actually performed,
without regard to skill, except as provided in § 5.5(a)(4). Laborers or mechanics performing work in more than one
classification may be compensated at the rate specified for each classification for the time actually worked therein:
Provided, that the employer's payroll records accurately set forth the time spent in each classification in which work is
performed. The wage determination (including any additional classification and wage rates conformed under paragraph
(a)(1)(ii) of this section) and the Davis-Bacon poster (WH-1321) shall be posted at all times by the Borrower and its
subcontractors at the site of the work in a prominent and accessible place where it can be easily seen by the workers.
Subrecipients may obtain wage determinations from the U.S. Department of Labor’s web site, www.dol.gov.
(ii)(A) The subrecipient(s), on behalf of EPA, shall require that any class of laborers or mechanics, including helpers,
which is not listed in the wage determination and which is to be employed under the contract shall be classified in
conformance with the wage determination. The State award official shall approve a request for an additional classification
and wage rate and fringe benefits therefore only when the following criteria have been met:
(1) The work to be performed by the classification requested is not performed by a classification in the wage
determination; and
(2) The classification is utilized in the area by the construction industry; and
Page 109 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 27 of 32 Attachment VII: Labor Standards Provisions
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
(3) The proposed wage rate, including any bona fide fringe benefits, bears a reasonable relationship to the wage rates
contained in the wage determination.
(B) If the contractor and the laborers and mechanics to be employed in the classification (if known), or their
representatives, and the subrecipient(s) agree on the classification and wage rate (including the amount designated for
fringe benefits where appropriate), documentation of the action taken and the request, including the local wage
determination shall be sent by the subrecipient (s) to the State award official. The State award official will transmit the
request, to the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, Employment Standards Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Washington, DC 20210 and to the EPA DB Regional Coordinator concurrently. The Administrator, or an
authorized representative, will approve, modify, or disapprove every additional classification request within 30 days of
receipt and so advise the State award official or will notify the State award official within the 30-day period that additional
time is necessary.
(C) In the event the contractor, the laborers or mechanics to be employed in the classification or their representatives,
and the subrecipient(s) do not agree on the proposed classification and wage rate (including the amount designated for
fringe benefits, where appropriate), the award official shall refer the request and the local wage determination, including
the views of all interested parties and the recommendation of the State award official, to the Administrator for
determination. The request shall be sent to the EPA DB Regional Coordinator concurrently. The Administrator, or an
authorized representative, will issue a determination within 30 days of receipt of the request and so advise the contracting
officer or will notify the contracting officer within the 30-day period that additional time is necessary.
(D) The wage rate (including fringe benefits where appropriate) determined pursuant to paragraphs (a)(1)(ii)(B) or (C) of
this section, shall be paid to all workers performing work in the classification under this contract from the first day on which
work is performed in the classification.
(iii) Whenever the minimum wage rate prescribed in the contract for a class of laborers or mechanics includes a fringe
benefit which is not expressed as an hourly rate, the contractor shall either pay the benefit as stated in the wage
determination or shall pay another bona fide fringe benefit or an hourly cash equivalent thereof.
(iv) If the contractor does not make payments to a trustee or other third person, the contractor may consider as part of the
wages of any laborer or mechanic the amount of any costs reasonably anticipated in providing bona fide fringe benefits
under a plan or program, provided, that the Secretary of Labor has found, upon the written request of the contractor, that
the applicable standards of the Davis-Bacon Act have been met. The Secretary of Labor may require the contractor to set
aside in a separate account assets for the meeting of obligations under the plan or program.
(2) Withholding. The subrecipient(s), shall upon written request of the EPA Award Official or an authorized representative
of the Department of Labor, withhold or cause to be withheld from the contractor under this contract or any other Federal
contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally-assisted contract subject to Davis-Bacon prevailing wage
requirements, which is held by the same prime contractor, so much of the accrued payments or advances as may be
considered necessary to pay laborers and mechanics, including apprentices, trainees, and helpers, employed by the
contractor or any subcontractor the full amount of wages required by the contract. In the event of failure to pay any
laborer or mechanic, including any apprentice, trainee, or helper, employed or working on the site of the work, all or part of
the wages required by the contract, the (Agency) may, after written notice to the contractor, sponsor, applicant, or owner,
take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further payment, advance, or guarantee of funds
until such violations have ceased.
(3) Payrolls and basic records.
(i) Payrolls and basic records relating thereto shall be maintained by the contractor during the course of the work and
preserved for a period of three years thereafter for all laborers and mechanics working at the site of the work. Such
records shall contain the name, address, and social security number of each such worker, his or her correct classification,
hourly rates of wages paid (including rates of contributions or costs anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits or cash
equivalents thereof of the types described in section 1(b)(2)(B) of the Davis-Bacon Act), daily and weekly number of hours
worked, deductions made and actual wages paid. Whenever the Secretary of Labor has found under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(iv)
that the wages of any laborer or mechanic include the amount of any costs reasonably anticipated in providing benefits
under a plan or program described in section 1(b)(2)(B) of the Davis-Bacon Act, the contractor shall maintain records
which show that the commitment to provide such benefits is enforceable, that the plan or program is financially
responsible, and that the plan or program has been communicated in writing to the laborers or mechanics affected, and
records which show the costs anticipated or the actual cost incurred in providing such benefits. Contractors employing
Page 110 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 28 of 32 Attachment VII: Labor Standards Provisions
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
apprentices or trainees under approved programs shall maintain written evidence of the registration of apprenticeship
programs and certification of trainee programs, the registration of the apprentices and trainees, and the ratios and wage
rates prescribed in the applicable programs.
(ii)(A) The contractor shall submit weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of all payrolls to
the subrecipient, that is, the entity that receives the sub-grant or loan from the State capitalization grant recipient. Such
documentation shall be available on request of the State recipient or EPA. As to each payroll copy received, the
subrecipient shall provide written confirmation in a form satisfactory to the State indicating whether or not the project is in
compliance with the requirements of 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1) based on the most recent payroll copies for the specified week.
The payrolls shall set out accurately and completely all of the information required to be maintained under 29 CFR
5.5(a)(3)(i), except that full social security numbers and home addresses shall not be included on the weekly payrolls.
Instead the payrolls shall only need to include an individually identifying number for each employee (e.g., the last four
digits of the employee's social security number). The required weekly payroll information may be submitted in any form
desired. Optional Form WH-347 is available for this purpose from the Wage and Hour Division Web site at
http://www.dol.gov/whd/forms/wh347instr.htm or its successor site. The prime contractor is responsible for the
submission of copies of payrolls by all subcontractors. Contractors and subcontractors shall maintain the full social
security number and current address of each covered worker, and shall provide them upon request to the subrecipient(s)
for transmission to the State or EPA if requested by EPA, the State, the contractor, or the Wage and Hour Division of the
Department of Labor for purposes of an investigation or audit of compliance with prevailing wage requirements. It is not a
violation of this section for a prime contractor to require a subcontractor to provide addresses and social security numbers
to the prime contractor for its own records, without weekly submission to the subrecipient(s).
(B) Each payroll submitted shall be accompanied by a “Statement of Compliance,” signed by the contractor or
subcontractor or his or her agent who pays or supervises the payment of the persons employed under the contract and
shall certify the following:
(1) That the payroll for the payroll period contains the information required to be provided under § 5.5 (a)(3)(ii) of
Regulations, 29 CFR part 5, the appropriate information is being maintained under § 5.5 (a)(3)(i) of Regulations, 29 CFR
part 5, and that such information is correct and complete;
(2) That each laborer or mechanic (including each helper, apprentice, and trainee) employed on the contract during the
payroll period has been paid the full weekly wages earned, without rebate, either directly or indirectly, and that no
deductions have been made either directly or indirectly from the full wages earned, other than permissible deductions as
set forth in Regulations, 29 CFR part 3;
(3) That each laborer or mechanic has been paid not less than the applicable wage rates and fringe benefits or cash
equivalents for the classification of work performed, as specified in the applicable wage determination incorporated into
the contract.
(C) The weekly submission of a properly executed certification set forth on the reverse side of Optional Form WH-347
shall satisfy the requirement for submission of the “Statement of Compliance” required by paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(B) of this
section.
(D) The falsification of any of the above certifications may subject the contractor or subcontractor to civil or criminal
prosecution under section 1001 of title 18 and section 231 of title 31 of the United States Code.
(iii) The contractor or subcontractor shall make the records required under paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section available for
inspection, copying, or transcription by authorized representatives of the State, EPA or the Department of Labor, and shall
permit such representatives to interview employees during working hours on the job. If the contractor or subcontractor
fails to submit the required records or to make them available, the Federal agency or State may, after written notice to the
contractor, sponsor, applicant, or owner, take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further
payment, advance, or guarantee of funds. Furthermore, failure to submit the required records upon request or to make
such records available may be grounds for debarment action pursuant to 29 CFR 5.12.
(4) Apprentices and trainees--
(i) Apprentices. Apprentices will be permitted to work at less than the predetermined rate for the work they performed
when they are employed pursuant to and individually registered in a bona fide apprenticeship program registered with the
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Apprenticeship Training, Employer and
Labor Services, or with a State Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the Office, or if a person is employed in his or her
first 90 days of probationary employment as an apprentice in such an apprenticeship program, who is not individually
Page 111 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 29 of 32 Attachment VII: Labor Standards Provisions
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
registered in the program, but who has been certified by the Office of Apprenticeship Training, Employer and Labor
Services or a State Apprenticeship Agency (where appropriate) to be eligible for probationary employment as an
apprentice. The allowable ratio of apprentices to journeymen on the job site in any craft classification shall not be greater
than the ratio permitted to the contractor as to the entire work force under the registered program. Any worker listed on a
payroll at an apprentice wage rate, who is not registered or otherwise employed as stated above, shall be paid not less
than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the classification of work actually performed. In addition, any
apprentice performing work on the job site in excess of the ratio permitted under the registered program shall be paid not
less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the work actually performed. Where a contractor is
performing construction on a project in a locality other than that in which its program is registered, the ratios and wage
rates (expressed in percentages of the journeyman's hourly rate) specified in the contractor's or subcontractor's registered
program shall be observed. Every apprentice must be paid at not less than the rate specified in the registered program
for the apprentice's level of progress, expressed as a percentage of the journeymen hourly rate specified in the applicable
wage determination. Apprentices shall be paid fringe benefits in accordance with the provisions of the apprenticeship
program. If the apprenticeship program does not specify fringe benefits, apprentices must be paid the full amount of
fringe benefits listed on the wage determination for the applicable classification. If the Administrator determines that a
different practice prevails for the applicable apprentice classification, fringes shall be paid in accordance with that
determination. In the event the Office of Apprenticeship Training, Employer and Labor Services, or a State
Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the Office, withdraws approval of an apprenticeship program, the contractor will no
longer be permitted to utilize apprentices at less than the applicable predetermined rate for the work performed until an
acceptable program is approved.
(ii) Trainees. Except as provided in 29 CFR 5.16, trainees will not be permitted to work at less than the predetermined
rate for the work performed unless they are employed pursuant to and individually registered in a program which has
received prior approval, evidenced by formal certification by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training
Administration. The ratio of trainees to journeymen on the job site shall not be greater than permitted under the plan
approved by the Employment and Training Administration. Every trainee must be paid at not less than the rate specified
in the approved program for the trainee's level of progress, expressed as a percentage of the journeyman hourly rate
specified in the applicable wage determination. Trainees shall be paid fringe benefits in accordance with the provisions of
the trainee program. If the trainee program does not mention fringe benefits, trainees shall be paid the full amount of
fringe benefits listed on the wage determination unless the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division determines that
there is an apprenticeship program associated with the corresponding journeyman wage rate on the wage determination
which provides for less than full fringe benefits for apprentices. Any employee listed on the payroll at a trainee rate who is
not registered and participating in a training plan approved by the Employment and Training Administration shall be paid
not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the classification of work actually performed. In
addition, any trainee performing work on the job site in excess of the ratio permitted under the registered program shall be
paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the work actually performed. In the event the
Employment and Training Administration withdraws approval of a training program, the contractor will no longer be
permitted to utilize trainees at less than the applicable predetermined rate for the work performed until an acceptable
program is approved.
(iii) Equal employment opportunity. The utilization of apprentices, trainees and journeymen under this part shall be in
conformity with the equal employment opportunity requirements of Executive Order 11246, as amended, and 29 CFR part
30.
(5) Compliance with Copeland Act requirements. The Borrower must comply with the requirements of 29 CFR part 3,
which are incorporated by reference in this contract.
(6) Subcontracts. The Borrower and/or subcontractor must insert in any subcontracts the clauses contained in 29 CFR
5.5(a)(1) through (10) and such other clauses as the EPA determines may by appropriate, and also a clause requiring the
subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for the
compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with all the contract clauses in 29 CFR 5.5.
(7) Contract termination; debarment. A breach of the contract clauses in 29 CFR 5.5 may be grounds for termination of
the contract, and for debarment as a contractor and a subcontractor as provided in 29 CFR 5.12.
(8) Compliance with Davis-Bacon and Related Act requirements. All rulings and interpretations of the Davis-Bacon and
Related Acts contained in 29 CFR parts 1, 3, and 5 are herein incorporated by reference in this contract.
Page 112 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 30 of 32 Attachment VII: Labor Standards Provisions
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
(9) Disputes concerning labor standards. Disputes arising out of the labor standards provisions of this contract shall not
be subject to the general disputes clause of this contract. Such disputes will be resolved according to the procedures of
the Department of Labor set forth in 29 CFR parts 5, 6, and 7. Disputes within the meaning of this clause include disputes
between the contractor (or any of its subcontractors) and Subrecipient(s), State, EPA, the U.S. Department of Labor, or
the employees or their representatives.
(10) Certification of eligibility.
(i) By entering into this contract, Borrower certifies that neither it (nor he or she) nor any person or firm who has an
interest in the Borrower’s firm is a person or firm ineligible to be awarded Government contracts by virtue of section 3(a) of
the Davis-Bacon Act or 29 CFR 5.12(a)(1).
(ii) No part of this contract shall be subcontracted to any person or firm ineligible for award of a Government contract by
virtue of section 3(a) of the Davis-Bacon Act or 29 CFR 5.12(a)(1).
(iii) The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in the U.S. Criminal Code, 18 USC 1001.
4. Contract Provision for Contracts in Excess of $100,000.
(a) Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. The subrecipient shall insert the following clauses set forth in
paragraphs (a)(1), (2), (3), and (4) of this section in full in any contract in an amount in excess of $100,000 and subject to
the overtime provisions of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. These clauses shall be inserted in addition
to the clauses required by Item 3, above or 29 CFR 4.6. As used in this paragraph, the terms laborers and mechanics
include watchmen and guards.
(1) Overtime requirements. No contractor or subcontractor contracting for any part of the contract work which may
require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic in any
workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such
laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all
hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek.
(2) Violation; liability for unpaid wages; liquidated damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section the contractor and any subcontractor responsible therefore shall be liable for the unpaid
wages. In addition, such contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under
contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to such District or to such territory), for liquidated damages. Such
liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and
guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, in the sum of $10 for each
calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty
hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(3) Withholding for unpaid wages and liquidated damages. The subrecipient, upon written request of the EPA Award
Official or an authorized representative of the Department of Labor, shall withhold or cause to be withheld, from any
moneys payable on account of work performed by the contractor or subcontractor under any such contract or any other
Federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally-assisted contract subject to the Contract Work
Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the same prime contractor, such sums as may be determined to be
necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such contractor or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as
provided in the clause set forth in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
(4) Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in paragraph
(a)(1) through (4) of this section and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier
subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor
with the clauses set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section.
(b) In addition to the clauses contained in Item 3, above, in any contract subject only to the Contract Work Hours and
Safety Standards Act and not to any of the other statutes cited in 29 CFR 5.1, the Subrecipient shall insert a clause
requiring that the contractor or subcontractor shall maintain payrolls and basic payroll records during the course of the
work and shall preserve them for a period of three years from the completion of the contract for all laborers and
mechanics, including guards and watchmen, working on the contract. Such records shall contain the name and address
of each such employee, social security number, correct classifications, hourly rates of wages paid, daily and weekly
number of hours worked, deductions made, and actual wages paid. Further, the Subrecipient shall insert in any such
contract a clause providing hat the records to be maintained under this paragraph shall be made available by the
Page 113 of 306
DWL29303-0 City of Pasco #2023-4226 Page 31 of 32 Attachment VII: Labor Standards Provisions
DWSRF Loan Contract (Municipal) v1
contractor or subcontractor for inspection, copying, or transcription by authorized representatives of the (write the name of
agency) and the Department of Labor, and the contractor or subcontractor will permit such representatives to interview
employees during working hours on the job.
5. Compliance Verification
(a) The subrecipient shall periodically interview a sufficient number of employees entitled to DB prevailing wages
(covered employees) to verify that contractors or subcontractors are paying the appropriate wage rates. As provided in 29
CFR 5.6(a)(6), all interviews must be conducted in confidence. The subrecipient must use Standard Form 1445 (SF
1445) or equivalent documentation to memorialize the interviews. Copies of the SF 1445 are available from EPA on
request.
(b) The subrecipient shall establish and follow an interview schedule based on its assessment of the risks of
noncompliance with DB posed by contractors or subcontractors and the duration of the contract or subcontract.
Subrecipients must conduct more frequent interviews if the initial interviews or other information indicated that there is a
risk that the contractor or subcontractor is not complying with DB.
Subrecipients shall immediately conduct interviews in response to an alleged violation of the prevailing wage
requirements. All interviews shall be conducted in confidence."
(c) The subrecipient shall periodically conduct spot checks of a representative sample of weekly payroll data to verify that
contractors or subcontractors are paying the appropriate wage rates. The subrecipient shall establish and follow a spot
check schedule based on its assessment of the risks of noncompliance with DB posed by contractors or subcontractors
and the duration of the contract or subcontract. At a minimum, if practicable, the subrecipient should spot check payroll
data within two weeks of each contractor or subcontractor’s submission of its initial payroll data and two weeks prior to the
completion date the contract or subcontract. Subrecipients must conduct more frequent spot checks if the initial spot
check or other information indicates that there is a risk that the contractor or subcontractor is not complying with DB. In
addition, during the examinations the subrecipient shall verify evidence of fringe benefit plans and payments thereunder
by contractors and subcontractors who claim credit for fringe benefit contributions.
(d) The subrecipient shall periodically review contractors and subcontractors use of apprentices and trainees to verify
registration and certification with respect to apprenticeship and training programs approved by either the U.S Department
of Labor or a state, as appropriate, and that contractors and subcontractors are not using disproportionate numbers of,
laborers, trainees and apprentices. These reviews shall be conducted in accordance with the schedules for spot checks
and interviews described in Item 5(b) and (c) above.
(e) Subrecipients must immediately report potential violations of the DB prevailing wage requirements to the Department
of Health and to the appropriate DOL Wage and Hour District Office listed at
https://www.dol.gov/whd/WHD_district_offices.pdf.
Page 114 of 306
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Regular Meeting
Pa
g
e
1
1
5
o
f
3
0
6
DWSRF Construction
Loan Agreement –
WPWTP Phases 3 and 4
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
1
1
6
o
f
3
0
6
Project Location
3
West Pasco WTP
Chapel Hill Blvd
Br
o
a
d
m
o
o
r
Bl
v
d
Pa
g
e
1
1
7
o
f
3
0
6
DWSRF Loan Agreement
4
DWL29303-0 Construction Loan – WPWTP Phase 3 and 4
TOTAL AWARD: $ 12,000,000.00
24-year loan term at 1.75% interest
Principal loan forgiveness of 48.5% of total award
Agreement scope includes Department of Health loan
administration
Fully funded construction, including CM services and
inspection
Pa
g
e
1
1
8
o
f
3
0
6
Financial Impact
5
Over $7 million in interest savings compared to
traditional revenue bond
Principal loan forgiveness of $5.8 million
Savings of estimated $150 thousand in loan issuance
costs
Overall savings for the ratepayers of nearly $13
million
Pa
g
e
1
1
9
o
f
3
0
6
WPWTP Phase 3 and 4 Scope
6
Raw water strainer and
membrane filter system
capacity upgrades
Expansion of chemical
treatment and backwash
residual solids systems
Service pumping
system capacity
upgrades
Pa
g
e
1
2
0
o
f
3
0
6
Questions?Pa
g
e
1
2
1
o
f
3
0
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 29, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Maria Serra, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4516 - Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund Loan Application Approval
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4516, authorizing the submittal a
Drinking for Application Loan Construction Fund Revolving State Water
Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Improvements Project.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
The City is pursuing a construction loan the Drinking Water State Revolving
Fund State Washington the through administered program (DWSRF)
Department of Health (DOH). The DWSRF construction loans currently have a
maximum award amount of up to $15,000,000 per jurisdiction per year. The
loan has a 24-year term with an effective interest rate of 1.75%
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
originally was WTP) Plant (Butterfield Water Butterfield The Treatment
constructed in 1946 and produces approximately 75% of the City’s potable
water supply that is critical for residential, commercial, industrial and fire
suppression several use. Although the Butterfield WTP has undergone
expansions and upgrades since its initial construction, most of the original core
systems and components of the plant have been in operation for over 60 years.
The Butterfield WTP Facility Plan (Plan) was completed in 2022 and evaluated
a 20-year planning horizon. The development of the Plan involved a process
which established performance goals for the plant, reviewed historical water
Page 122 of 306
quality issues, evaluated plant performance and condition, evaluated
alternatives for water treatment technologies, and produced a Capital
Improvements Plan that included repair and replacement projects for the
Butterfield WTP.
The DWSRF Loan Program makes funds available to municipalities to repair,
replace, or construct new water system infrastructure. Projects funded through
this program are subject to both state and federal laws and regulations.
Applications for the DWSRF Loan Program funds require authorization of the
legislative body. Should the City be selected as a recipient for a DWSRF
construction loan, the loan agreement will be subject to Council review and
approval.
V. DISCUSSION:
This item was discussed at the October 28, 2024 Council Workshop meeting.
Staff requests approval for submittal of a low-interest loan application to the
Washington State Department of Health Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
program for the Butterfield WTP Improvements project. Council action, in the
form of a resolution, is sufficient to meet funding application requirements.
Page 123 of 306
Resolution - DWSRF Loan Application Approval for Butterfield WTP - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A DRINKING WATER STATE
REVOLVING FUND (DWSRF) CONSTRUCTION LOAN APPLICATION FOR
THE BUTTERFIELD WATER TREATMENT PLANT (WTP)
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the Butterfield WTP, originally built in 1946, is nearing the end of its
forecasted service life, and a phased replacement of the facility over the next 20 years is proposed;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) adopted the Butterfield WTP Facilities Plan, which
defines a capital improvement strategy to address capacity, water quality, safety, and end-of-life
deficiencies; and
WHEREAS, to help fund these improvements, the City is requesting authorization to
apply for a low-interest DWSRF construction loan with the Washington State Department of
Health (DOH); and
WHEREAS, the DWSRF Loan Program provides low-interest construction loans to fund
municipal water system capital improvements that increase public health protection by ensuring
safe and reliable drinking water infrastructure. This program is funded through the congressional
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) and subject to federal regulations; and
WHEREAS, the DWSRF loan application process requires documentation of City Council
approval of the submittal of a DWSRF loan application; and
WHEREAS, as currently advertised, DWSRF construction loans have a maximum award
amount of up to $15,000,000 per jurisdiction at a 1.75% interest rate; and
WHEREAS, if the City is selected as a recipient for the DWSRF construction loan, the
loan agreement will be subject to City Council review and approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco hereby authorizes the submittal of the
construction loan application to the Washington State Department of Health DWSRF Loan
Program for the Butterfield WTP Improvements Project.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 124 of 306
Resolution - DWSRF Loan Application Approval for Butterfield WTP - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of ____,
2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 125 of 306
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Regular Meeting
Pa
g
e
1
2
6
o
f
3
0
6
Butterfield WTP DWSRF
Loan Application Approval
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
1
2
7
o
f
3
0
6
Butterfield WTP – Existing Facility and System
3
W. A St.
Pa
g
e
1
2
8
o
f
3
0
6
Butterfield WTP – Conceptual Buildout of Plant
Improvements
4
W.
A
S
t
.
W. A St.
Pa
g
e
1
2
9
o
f
3
0
6
DWSRF Construction Loan Application for
Butterfield WTP
5
Amount: $ 15M per jurisdiction
24-year loan term at 1.75% interest
Scope – Early Works Package
Electrical Reliability Improvements
River Intake Screens Replacement
Raw Water Pump Station Upgrades
Pa
g
e
1
3
0
o
f
3
0
6
Questions?Pa
g
e
1
3
1
o
f
3
0
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 29, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Maria Serra, Public Works Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4517 - Change Order No. 6 for the East Urban Growth
Area Expansion Sewer Local Improvement District No.152 Phase 4
Project
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
PowerPoint Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION:City the authorizing No. 4517, approve Resolution to move I
Manager to execute Change Order No. 6 with Apollo, Inc. for the East Urban
Growth Area Expansion Sewer Local Improvement District No. 152 Phase 4
Project.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Engineer’s Estimate $ 7,439,000.00
Original Construction Agreement $ 5,693,720.19
Previously Approved Change Order
Nos. 1-5 $ 288,699.21
Change Order No. 6 $ 362,534.00
New Construction Agreement
Total $ 6,344,953.40
The adopted budget for the project is sufficient to accommodate this change
order.
2021-2022 Adopted Biennial Budget allocated to this project: $5M (Amount is
for the whole LID)
2023-2024 Adopted Biennial Budget allocated to this project: $17.364M
(Amount is for the whole LID)
Page 132 of 306
Total Adopted Budget $22.364M (Amount is for the whole LID)
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
On May 23, 2022, Council Approved Ordinance No. 4592 which formed Local
Improvement District (LID) No. 152 ordering the sanitary sewer and lift station
improvements within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) Expansion east of Road
68.
To allow the project to move forward expeditiously into construction, the unified
scope of work was broken into four phases, each of them packaged into a set
of bid documents and treated as an individual construction contract.
Phase 1 installed six bore trench crossings with casings. Three
were two railroad, BNSF the underneath installed were crossings
installed underneath N. Glade Road, and one was installed underneath
N. Railroad Avenue. This construction project totaled $3,178,063.39 and
was accepted by Council via Resolution No. 4458.
Phase 2 installed gravity sewer main from the north end of the UGA
east to N. Glade Road and south along N. Glade Road to the location of
the future lift station. This construction project totaled $1,496,859.67 and
was accepted by Council via Resolution No. 4434.
Phase 3 built a sewer lift station at the corner of N. Glade Road and
Burns Road (extended). This project also installed a set of force mains
to connect the new system to the existing gravity collection systems
located along Foster Wells Road and Capital Avenue, and at Foster
Wells Road and Industrial Way. This construction project has reached
Substantial is and $3,755,604.36, of a total for Completion cost
scheduled for discussion and project acceptance at the 11/12 and 11/18
Council meetings.
Phase 4 installed the remainder of the gravity sewer trunk mains serving
the properties to the west of the lift station and N. Glade Road. This
construction is and Completion has reached project Substantial
scheduled for discussion and project acceptance at the 11/12 and 11/18
Council meetings.
The construction contract for the East UGA Expansion Sewer LID No. 152 –
Phase 4 project was awarded to Apollo, Inc. of Kennewick, WA on April 17,
2023, in the amount of $5,693,720.19 via Resolution No. 4337. There have
been five Change Orders approved to-date for the Phase 4 project. Below is a
summary of the previously approved Change Orders:
Change Order 1 – Multiple items addressed ($3,371.76): This change
order accounted for three minor items: 1) Archeological staking as
required by Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation due to
Page 133 of 306
an artifact being found on nearby property; 2) Additional survey time
required for manhole shifts; and 3) Labor & equipment costs to locate
and cross an unmarked water line.
Change Order 2 – Topsoil Stockpile Removal ($38,737.42): This
change order was for the added time, labor, and equipment costs
needed to remove the stockpiled topsoil placed on the path of the sewer
line by a developer’s contractor.
Change Order 3 – Farm 2005 Grade Changes ($171,135.67): This
change order addressed the added quantity of earthwork being moved
due to the use of a wrong datum that was provided by a developer.
Change Order 4 – Sewer Alignment Shift around construction
($38,062.67): This change order consisted of the cost of material and
labor needed to extend the path of the gravity sewer line around the
construction limits of a contractor that arrived on-site prior to the Phase
4 project work.
Change Order 5 – Hydroseeding ($37,391.69): This change order
added hydroseeding to the corners of a property that continued farming
operations and was needed to return the land to existing conditions.
V. DISCUSSION:
This item was presented to Council at the October 28, 2024, Workshop as a
discussion item.
The proposed Change Order No. 6 is the final change order for the Phase 4
project. The Change Order adds $362,534.00 to the project and brings the total
construction contract to $6,344,953.40, well below the engineer's estimate of
$7,439,000. The details of proposed Change Order No. 6 are shown below:
Update earthwork quantities of Bid Items 17 and 18 - added quantities to
the items to reflect the description and intent of the required work. (Add:
$433,890.77)
Reconciliation of Bid Item 14 to match final construction quantities -
added one manhole to the project. (Add: $4,140.00)
Reconciliation of Bid Item 16 to match final construction quantities - item
was not used during the duration of this contract. (Deduct: $68,850.00)
Reconciliation of Bid Item 19 to match final construction quantities - item
was not used during the duration of this contract. (Deduct: $15,600.00)
Reconciliation of Bid Item 26 to match final construction quantities - item
was only partially used during the duration of this contract. (Deduct:
$20,675.35)
City Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 in the amount of
$362,534.00 for the East UGA Expansion Sewer LID No. 152 Phase 4 Project.
Page 134 of 306
Resolution – CO 6 to East UGA LID No. 152 - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER
NO. 6 WITH APOLLO, INC. FOR THE EAST URBAN GROWTH AREA
EXPANSION SEWER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 152 PHASE
4 PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City), and Apollo, Inc. entered into a Construction
Contract on April 5, 2024, for the construction of the East Urban Growth Area (UGA) Expansion
Sewer Local Improvement District (LID) No. 152 Phase 4 project; and
WHEREAS, this project involves installation of gravity sewer lines through the East
UGA, from Convention Dr. and Deseret Rd. to the east and south, to the Phase 3 lift station at
North Glade Rd and Burns extended; and
WHEREAS, previously approved Change Order Nos. 1 – 5 were under the authority
provided by the Public Works Director and City Manager; and
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 6 is for additional earthwork quantities that were utilized
in the mass grading effort to allow for the use of continued farming, and the reconciliation of the
remaining bid items; and
WHEREAS, the $362,534.00 amount of Change Order No. 6 adds the cumulative sum
of both fill and excavation to the respective unit bid costs of bid items 17 and 18, as well as
reconciling four other bid items (14, 16, 19, and 26); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into Change
Order No. 6 with Apollo, Inc.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the
Change Order No. 6 between the City of Pasco and Apollo, Inc. as attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is
hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Change Order No. 6 on behalf of the
City of Pasco.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 135 of 306
Resolution – CO 6 to East UGA LID No. 152 - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of
_____, 2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 136 of 306
11/04/2024
Pasco City Council
Regular Meeting
Pa
g
e
1
3
7
o
f
3
0
6
East UGA LID: 152
Phase 4 Change
Order No. 6
11/04/2024
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
1
3
8
o
f
3
0
6
East UGA Expansion Sewer LID
3
Pa
g
e
1
3
9
o
f
3
0
6
•Provides sanitary sewer service to over 1,000 acres of development in north Pasco
•Four-phase project with new gravity sewer, force main, and lift station
•Bids opened between November 2022 and April 2023
•Project Costs
LID Formation Ordinance (May 26, 2022) = $21,494,000
Initial Estimation of costs = $25,754,600
•Cost savings for LID include removal of Lift Station and Mass Grading
•Initial estimated savings due to Mass Grading, Lift Station removal, and additional
piping removal due to new route = $6,400,000
East UGA Expansion Sewer LID
Project Overview
4
Pa
g
e
1
4
0
o
f
3
0
6
Additional Excavation and Fill Work
5
Pa
g
e
1
4
1
o
f
3
0
6
Change Order No. 6
6
Proposed change order includes:
•Additional Excavation
•Reconciliation of all other bid items to
match final quantities.
•Final cost of Change Order No. 6:
$362,534.00
Pa
g
e
1
4
2
o
f
3
0
6
East UGA Expansion Sewer LID Phase 4
Construction Costs
7
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
$7,439,000.00Engineer’s Estimate
$5,693,720.19Bid Award
$288,699.21Change Orders 1-5
$362,534.00Change Order No. 6
$6,344,953.40New Total Agreement
Pa
g
e
1
4
3
o
f
3
0
6
East UGA Expansion Sewer LID Phase 4
8
Pa
g
e
1
4
4
o
f
3
0
6
Pa
g
e
1
4
5
o
f
3
0
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 29, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Craig Raymond, Deputy Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Public Meeting & Resolution No.4518 - Accepting a Notice of Intent to
Commence Annex Horrigan Farms & Cherry Bloom 10% Annexation
Petition (5 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Resolution to Commence Annexation Proceedings Accepting the
Boundary as Petitioned
or
Proposed Resolution to Commence Annexation Proceedings Accepting the
Boundary including a portion of the right-of-way of Burns Road
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
CONDUCT A PUBLIC MEETING
MOTION A: I move to approve Resolution No. 4518, accepting a notice of
intent to commence annexation proceedings for the Horrigan Farms and
Cherry Bloom Annexation providing a determination on the boundary to be
annexed, and whether simultaneous zoning and the assumption of bonded
indebtedness will be required.
-or-
MOTION B: I move to approve Resolution No. 4518, accepting a notice of
intent to commence annexation proceedings for the Horrigan Farms and
Cherry Bloom Annexation providing a determination on the boundary to be
annexed, which includes a portion of the right-of-way of Burns Road, and
whether simultaneous zoning and assumption of bonded indebtedness will be
required.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Page 146 of 306
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The owners of Parcel No. 126160129 (Short Plat 2021-08, Lot 2), property
located south of Burns Road and east of Shoreline Drive in Section 12,
Township 9N, Range 28 E.W.M., submitted a Notice of Intent to Commence
Annexation of an area consisting of Parcel 126160129 (Short Plat 2021-08 Lot
2), Parcel 126160173, and Parcel 126160174 (Short Plat 2022-32 Lots 1 & 2)
in Franklin County, WA 99301.
Per RCW 35A.14.120, City Council shall set a date, not later than sixty days
after the filing of the request, for a meeting with the initiating parties to
determine whether the City Council will accept, reject, or geographically modify
the proposed annexation.
On October 21, 2024, City Council Passed Resolution No. 4512 setting 7:00
PM, November 4, 2024, as the time and date for a public meeting to consider a
Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings for the Horrigan Farms
and Cherry Bloom Annexation Area.
V. DISCUSSION:
The petition method of annexation is a two-step process requiring the submittal
of a Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation proceedings followed at a later
date by consideration of an actual annexation petition.
Upon receipt of a Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation - Council is
required by law to set a date to hold a public meeting to consider:
1. Whether the City will accept, reject, or geographically modify the
proposed annexation;
2. Whether it will require the simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning
regulation; and
3. Whether it will require the assumption of all or any portion of existing
City indebtedness by the area to be annexed.
City of Pasco Development Services requests that the Annexation Area be
geographically modified to encompass the Burns Road Right-of-Way from the
western-most corner of Parcel 126160129/Short Plat 2021-08 Lot 2 east to the
Municipal Boundary of the City of Pasco (MOTION B). Franklin County Public
Works Department has been in contact with City Staff and has voiced no
objection to the City annexing the Burns Road right-of-way.
Passage of a resolution generally accepting the boundary is a condition
Page 147 of 306
precedent to circulation of the annexation petition.
Page 148 of 306
Resolution – Accept & Proceed (ANX 2024-005) - 1
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, ACCEPTING A NOTICE
OF INTENT TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
HORRIGAN FARMS AND CHERRY BLOOM ANNEXATION, PROVIDING A
DETERMINATION ON THE BOUNDARY TO BE ANNEXED, AND
WHETHER SIMULTANEOUS ZONING AND THE ASSUMPTION OF
BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE REQUIRED.
WHEREAS, the owners of property of Short Plat 2021-08 Lot 2 have filed a Notice of
Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings to the City of Pasco; and
WHEREAS, on October 21, 2024 the City Council set a November 4, 2024, public
meeting date with the initiators to consider (1) whether the City will accept, reject, or
geographically modify the proposed annexation; (2) whether it will require the simultaneous
adoption of a proposed zoning regulation; and (3) whether it will require the assumption of all or
any portion of existing City indebtedness by the area to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Notice of Intent, conducted a public
meeting with the initiators, and has determined it is in the best interests of the City to accept the
proposal as described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that the proposed annexation site is within the Pasco
Urban Growth Area, annexation of the proposed site would be a natural extension of the City and
said annexation would be in the best interest of the Pasco community.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
That the City will accept the proposed territory to be annexed as described in Exhibit A
and depicted in Exhibit B attached hereto.
Be It Resolved, that the territory to be annexed will not require simultaneous adoption of
zoning regulations. Zoning will be determined through a public hearing process with input from
affected property owners.
Be It Further Resolved that the annexation area will be required to assume a proportionate
share of existing City bonded indebtedness.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 149 of 306
Resolution – Accept & Proceed (ANX 2024-005) - 1
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of November,
2024.
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 150 of 306
Resolution – Accept & Proceed (ANX 2024-005) - 1
EXHIBIT A
ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SHORT PLAT 2021-08 LOT 2, AND SHORT PLAT 2022-32 LOTS 1 AND 2.
Page 151 of 306
Resolution – Accept & Proceed (ANX 2024-005) - 1
EXHIBIT B
Page 152 of 306
Resolution – Accept & Proceed (ANX 2024-005) - 1
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, ACCEPTING A NOTICE
OF INTENT TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
HORRIGAN FARMS AND CHERRY BLOOM ANNEXATION, PROVIDING A
DETERMINATION ON THE BOUNDARY TO BE ANNEXED WHICH
INCLUDES A PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF BURNS ROAD, AND
WHETHER SIMULTANEOUS ZONING AND THE ASSUMPTION OF
BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE REQUIRED.
WHEREAS, the owners of property of Short Plat 2021-08 Lot 2 have filed a Notice of
Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings to the City of Pasco; and
WHEREAS, on October 21, 2024 the City Council set an November 4, 2024 public
meeting date with the initiators to consider (1) whether the City will accept, reject, or
geographically modify the proposed annexation; (2) whether it will require the simultaneous
adoption of a proposed zoning regulation; and (3) whether it will require the assumption of all or
any portion of existing City indebtedness by the area to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Notice of Intent, conducted a public
meeting with the initiators, and has determined it is in the best interests of the City to accept the
proposal as described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that the proposed annexation site is within the Pasco
Urban Growth Area, annexation of the proposed site would be a natural extension of the City and
said annexation would be in the best interest of the Pasco community.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
That the City will accept the proposed territory to be annexed as described in Exhibit A
and depicted in Exhibit B attached hereto.
Be It Further Resolved, that the territory to be annexed will not require simultaneous
adoption of zoning regulations. Zoning will be determined through a public hearing process with
input from affected property owners.
Be It Further Resolved that the annexation area will be required to assume a proportionate
share of existing City bonded indebtedness.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 153 of 306
Resolution – Accept & Proceed (ANX 2024-005) - 1
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this 4th day of November,
2024.
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 154 of 306
Resolution – Accept & Proceed (ANX 2024-005) - 1
EXHIBIT A
ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SHORT PLAT 2021-08 LOT 2, AND ALSO
SHORT PLAT 2022-32 LOTS 1 AND 2, AND ALSO
THE RIGHT OF WAY OF BURNS ROAD DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT THE
NORTHWESTERN MOST CORNER OF SHORT PLAT 2021-08 LOT 2 AND CONTINUING
N 0 10’ 15” W TO THE NORTHERN LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF BURNS ROAD,
THEN EAST FOLLOWING THE NORTHERN LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF BURNS
ROAD UNTIL IT INTERSECTS THE MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF THE CITY OF PASCO, THEN
SOUTHERLY ALONG THE MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF THE CITY OF PASCO TO THE
INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 7 TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH RANGE
29 E.W.M., THEN WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 7 TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH EAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12 TOWNSHIP 9
NORTH RANGE 28 E.W.M., THEN S 89 17’ 32” W 1,968.52 FEET, THEN S 0 22’ 50” W 50
FEET, THEN S 89 17’ 32” W 677.81 FEET ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SHORT
PLAT 2022-32 LOT 1, THEN N 0 10’ 15” W 10 FEET, THEN S 89 56’ 58” W 990.10 FEET
ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SHORT PLAT 2021-08 LOT 2 TO THE POINT OF
BEGNING.
Page 155 of 306
Resolution – Accept & Proceed (ANX 2024-005) - 1
Page 156 of 306
Annexations (RCW 35A.14.120, PMC 25.220)
➢The legislative body shall set a date, not later than sixty days after the filing of the
request, for a meeting with the initiating parties to determine whether the City
Council will accept, reject, or geographically modify the proposed annexation.
On October 21, 2024 City Council Passed Resolution No. 4512 setting 7:00 PM,
November 4, 2024, as the time and date for a public meeting to consider a
Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings for the Horrigan Farms
and Cherry Bloom Annexation Area.
City of Pasco Development Services requests that the Annexation Area be
geographically modified to encompass the Burns Road Right-of-Way from the
western-most corner of Parcel 126160129/Short Plat 2021-08 Lot 2 east to
the Municipal Boundary of the City of Pasco
ANX 2024-005 –
Horrigan Farms and Cherry Bloom
Pa
g
e
1
5
7
o
f
3
0
6
PETITIONED
Horrigan
Farms
and Cherry
Bloom
Annexation
Area
•Parcel 126160129
Short Plat 2021-08, Lot 2
•Parcel 126160173
Short Plat 2022-32, Lot 1
•Parcel 126160174
Short Plat 2022-32, Lot 2
Pa
g
e
1
5
8
o
f
3
0
6
EXPANDED
ANNEXATION
AREA TO
INCLUDE
BURNS ROAD
ROW Horrigan
Pa
g
e
1
5
9
o
f
3
0
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 30, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Darcy Buckley, Finance Director
Finance
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 4736 - 2025 Ad Valorem Tax (Property Tax) (10 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
2025 Levy Options via 3 variations of the Ordinance
Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Motion A: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4736, providing for zero percent
increase in the regular property taxes of the City for levy in 2024 and collection
in the 2025 tax year; preserving levy capacity for future years; and providing for
related matters and, further, authorize publication by summary only.
-or-
Motion B: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4736, providing for a one percent
increase in the regular property taxes of the City for levy in 2024 and collection
in the 2025 tax year; preserving banked levy capacity for future years; and
providing for related matters and, further, authorize publication by summary
only.
-or-
Motion C: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4736, providing for a one percent
increase, plus the banked capacity of four percent in the regular property taxes
of the City for levy in 2024 and collection in the 2025 tax year; and providing for
related matters and, further, authorize publication by summary only.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
The City's share of Ad Valorem (Property Tax) rate for 2025 collections is set
by Council authorization. Based on State law, the City has the option to
increase its property tax budget by the lesser of the Implicit Price Deflator (IDP)
Page 160 of 306
or one percent (1%). The Implicit Price Deflator for 2025 rate setting is
calculated at 2.57%, meaning the full 1% levy increase can be assessed. The
availability of prior years' banked levy capacity for years where no levy
increase was approved can be included in the levy budget for the coming tax
year, 2025. Therefore, three options for property tax collection budget for year
2025 exist.
1. If no increase is approved, only new properties identified by Franklin
County Assessor's Office will provide additional property tax revenue in
2025.
2. If the allowance for a one percent (1%) increase is approved, additional
tax revenue of $138,947 is added to the City's revenue budget.
3. Finally, with the inclusion of the banked capacity, levy amount increases
by an additional $602,726.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The General Fund is the primary administrative and operational fund of the
City. As compared to the City-wide budget, activity recorded in the General
Fund represents approximately a third of City revenues. Therefore, reviewing
the results of current activity is valuable for making budgetary projections and
ad valorem (property) tax decisions. While prudent to undertake this analysis,
RCW 84.55.120 also requires a public hearing be conducted on General Fund
revenue sources for the coming year’s budget, including possible increases in
the City’s property tax levy. This public hearing was held at the council meeting
of October 21st, 2024.
Council may pass an ordinance that authorizes an increase in the property tax
levy for the coming year, 2025. The statutory increase in the levy is limited to
the lessor of inflation, as measured by the Implicit Price Deflator or, one
percent increase. Any increase approved is applied to the highest lawful levy to
date. IPD as an economic measurement differs from the Consumer Price
Index, or CPI. Unlike the CPI, the IPD rate is not based on a fixed basket of
goods and services in a specified region. Instead, the goods and services
included in the IPD basket considers national inputs. The rate is also
influenced by consumption and investment patterns. The IPD as of September
26, 2024 is 2.57%. Additionally, the State statutory limit on City levy rate is
$3.60 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. The City of Pasco levy rate for 2024 is
$1.079 per $1,000 of assessed valuation, significantly below the statutory limit.
Property tax is a significant portion of General Fund revenue, projected to be
17.8% of preliminary General Fund revenue the 2025-2026 Biennium, other
General Fund revenues include sales tax, utility tax, fees and charges for
services, fines and penalties, and licenses and permits. Ultimately, where one
revenue source is lower, another must be increased to make up revenue
requirements to support General Fund service provision.
Page 161 of 306
Other General Fund revenue sources exist that are variable and dependent
upon uncertain or infrequent events. Some examples are property sale,
refunds, interest earnings, donations, and transfers in from other funds for
unique projects.
Those services typically viewed as governmental in nature are the same
services revenues. resulting and assessments by property supported tax
Property tax revenue is a stable and reliable source to support community
services like public safety. Additionally, parks and recreation functions and City
sponsored community events also benefit from the collection of property taxes.
Finally, the functions of City administration, finance, technological support and
tools, and a myriad of other “internal services" are funded partially from the
dollars provided by property tax revenues.
Franklin County Assessor’s Office has provided values of new construction,
state assessed utility, tax increment area and assessed value figures that
make up the levy calculation.
V. DISCUSSION:
At the time of the public hearing of October 21st, the City had relayed an
inquiry to Franklin appreciation County assessed to related valuation
Assessor's Office. The inquiry was the result of preliminary assessed valuation
for 2025 increasing for a value less than the total new construction value. The
measure properties existing of that valuation change the of indicated
decreased by a value of $49M. Based on Assessor Office review, the reduction
is a reflection of market value changes in various areas of town. Market values
were determined based upon year end 2023 sales activity.
On October 31, the Assessor's Office provided updated new construction
values, increasing by $61.9M. The necessary amendment was discovered
during an audit of taxpayer reported values. The original reporting included a
misclassification between new construction and other property elements at a
given property. Therefore, the total assessed value was correct, but the
allocation change. required value assessed and new between existing
Considering this update to new construction, the cumulative effect of reduction
to existing value of property reflected in the 2024 calculation was $111M, or
0.90%
Historically, Council has evaluated property tax levy decisions based on current
and Council anticipated General Fund needs. For example, in 2018,
determined to capture the City’s banked levy capacity from prior years to fund
capital improvements like those undertaken at Fire Stations Nos. 83 and 84.
For the years, 2019 through 2022, the assessment of a one percent levy
increase was declined and the capacity banked.
Page 162 of 306
Actual and planned community growth over the past couple of years has been
robust. Growth, and related demand for services, often precedes revenue
collection when considering property tax due to the delayed recognition of new
construction.
In accordance with RCW 84.55.120, ad valorem (property tax) must be
approved by Council and remitted for certification to the Assessor's Office by
November 30th of each year.
As part of budgetary planning for 2025 - 2026 biennium, the value of banked
capacity has been included in revenue projects. For consideration, however,
the various ad valorem assessment calculations have been included in this
presentation. Each levy calculation will include the increment of improvement
for Tax Increment Financing areas valued at $224,256.
Included are the calculations reflecting no levy increase, a one percent
increase, or the combined increase of one percent plus recognition of banked
capacity. While the City levy will include property value for Tax Increment
Financing (TIF) Areas collections, the collections associated with the Port of
Pasco TIF area will be remitted to the Port.
Option A: No Increase
This option declines the statutorily allowed one percent increase in the City
property tax levy. Instead, this option would result in the City banking the
capacity to levy at a future date with Council approval. Important to this
decision is the consideration that the City is not able nor has oversight to
ensure that its banked capacity remains intact. Based on record-keeping of the
Assessor’s Office and Department of Revenue, it is possible that breakdown in
process or clerical error could result in a loss of formerly bank capacity.
Another important factor to consider when banking levy capacity is the impact
of assessed value. As assessed value in the City grows, the value of the
banked capacity decreases. The effect of new construction adds to the overall
assessed valuation of the City. As assessed value is the denominator by which
the levy rate is calculated, an increase serves to reduce the levy rate. More
importantly, when the City capture the banked capacity like it did in 2018, it
increases property tax for property owners by a significant amount in one year
instead of incremental increase over the years.
This estimate reflects an increase of $ 763,521 over the 2024 levy amount for
unrestricted General Fund use. This change is the product of the estimated
increase in assessed valuation primarily due to addition of newly constructed
properties in 2024 as well as the incremental increase in TIF area property
values since TIF adoption. Based upon the calculation of estimated new
construction the levy rate for Option A is $1.1085 per $1,000 assessed value.
Page 163 of 306
This new levy rate is $0.0287 greater than the rate applied in 2024.
Option B: 1% Statutory Increase
This estimate includes the addition of the one percent statutory limit, or
$138,947, the levy value attributed to new construction, and the incremental
increase value of $224,256 for the TIF areas. The total levy amount increase
with this option is estimated at $902,468. The levy rate resulting from this
calculation is $1.1194 per $1,000 assessed value. Based on this calculation,
the 2025 levy rate will be $0.0396 per $1,000 assessed value greater than the
amount levied in 2024.
Option C: 1% Statutory Increase and Existing Banked Capacity
This estimate includes the addition of the one percent statutory limit, or
$138,947, the incremental value of TIF appreciation, levy value attributed to
new construction and recapture of banked value of $579,791. The total levy
amount increase with this option is $1,482,259. The levy rate resulting from this
calculation is $1.165 per $1,000 assessed value. Based on this calculation, the
2025 levy rate will be $0.0853 greater than the amount levied in 2024.
In order for the Assessor to levy property taxes, the City is required to certify
property tax levies with the County no later than November 30th of each year.
Page 164 of 306
Ordinance – 2025 Ad Valorum Tax - 1
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
PROVIDING FOR ZERO PERCENT INCREASE IN THE REGULAR
PROPERTY TAXES OF THE CITY FOR LEVY IN 2024 AND COLLECTION
IN THE 2025 TAX YEAR; PRESERVING LEVY CAPACITY FOR FUTURE
YEARS; AND PROVIDING FOR RELATED MATTERS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings and Determinations. The City Council of the City of Pasco,
Washington (City), makes the following findings and determinations:
(a) RCW 84.55.120(1) provides that the City Council must hold a public hearing on
revenue sources for the following year’s current expense budget and that the hearing
must include consideration of possible increases in property tax revenues and must be
held prior to the time the City levies the taxes.
(b) RCW 84.55.120(3) provides that the City may not authorize an increase in property tax
revenue from the previous year except by adoption of a separate ordinance or
resolution, pursuant to notice, specifically authorizing the increase in terms of both
dollars and percentage.
(c) Pursuant to proper notice, the City Council held a public hearing (Hearing) on October
21, 2024, to consider the City’s 2025 revenue sources, along with consideration of
possible increases in property tax revenues.
(d) The City’s actual levy amount from the previous year was $13,314,947.
(e) The City has a population that is greater than 10,000.
The City Council, after the Hearing and after duly considering all relevant evidence and
testimony presented, determined that the City requires 0% in allowable increase in property tax
revenue from the previous year, in addition to revenue resulting from the addition of new
construction and improvements to property, newly constructed wind turbines, solar, biomass and
geothermal facilities, if the facilities are not state assessed, any increase in the value of state-
assessed property, any annexations that have occurred and any refunds made, in order to discharge
the expected expenses and obligations of the City and in its best interest and increment value
associated with an established Tax Increment Financing Area.
Section 2. Property Tax Increase Authorized. An increase in the regular property
tax levy of the City is authorized for the levy to be collected in the 2025 tax year. The dollar
amount of the increase over the actual levy amount from the previous year is $ 0 (zero), which is
a percentage increase of 0% (zero percent) from the previous year. This increase is exclusive of
Page 165 of 306
Ordinance – 2025 Ad Valorum Tax - 2
additional revenue resulting from new construction, improvements to property, any increase in
assessed value due to construction of wind turbine, solar, biomass and geothermal facilities, if the
facilities are not state assessed, any increase in the value of state-assessed property, any
annexations that have occurred, any refunds made, and increment value associated with an
established Tax Increment Financing Area.
Section 3. Transmittal. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a
certified copy of this Ordinance to the Franklin County Assessor on or before November 30, 2024.
Section 4. General Authorization and Ratification. The City Manager, the Finance
Director of the City, the City Clerk and other appropriate officers of the City, and each of them
acting alone, are authorized and directed to take any action and to execute any document as in their
judgment may be necessary or desirable to effectuate the provisions of this Ordinance. All prior
actions in furtherance of and consistent with the terms of this Ordinance are ratified and confirmed.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word
of this Ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this
Ordinance.
Section 6. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this Ordinance, including scrivener’s errors
or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or
numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take full force and
effect five (5) days after approval, passage, and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of
______________, 2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ________________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Published: _____________________________
Page 166 of 306
Ordinance – 2025 Ad Valorum Tax - 1
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
PROVIDING FOR A ONE PERCENT INCREASE IN THE REGULAR
PROPERTY TAXES OF THE CITY FOR LEVY IN 2024 AND COLLECTION
IN THE 2025 TAX YEAR; PRESERVING BANKED LEVY CAPACITY FOR
FUTURE YEARS; AND PROVIDING FOR RELATED MATTERS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings and Determinations. The City Council of the City of Pasco,
Washington (City), makes the following findings and determinations:
(a) RCW 84.55.120(1) provides that the City Council must hold a public hearing on
revenue sources for the following year’s current expense budget and that the hearing
must include consideration of possible increases in property tax revenues and must be
held prior to the time the City levies the taxes.
(b) RCW 84.55.120(3) provides that the City may not authorize an increase in property tax
revenue from the previous year except by adoption of a separate ordinance or
resolution, pursuant to notice, specifically authorizing the increase in terms of both
dollars and percentage.
(c) Pursuant to proper notice, the City Council held a public hearing (Hearing) on October
21, 2024, to consider the City’s 2025 revenue sources, along with consideration of
possible increases in property tax revenues.
(d) The City’s actual levy amount from the previous year was $13,314,947.
(e) The City has a population that is greater than 10,000.
The City Council, after the Hearing and after duly considering all relevant evidence and
testimony presented, determined that the City requires 1% in allowable increase in property tax
revenue from the previous year, in addition to revenue resulting from the addition of new
construction and improvements to property, newly constructed wind turbines, solar, biomass and
geothermal facilities, if the facilities are not state assessed, any increase in the value of state-
assessed property, any annexations that have occurred and any refunds made, in order to discharge
the expected expenses and obligations of the City and in its best interest and increment value
associated with an established Tax Increment Financing Area.
Section 2. Property Tax Increase Authorized. An increase in the regular property
tax levy of the City is authorized for the levy to be collected in the 2025 tax year. The dollar
amount of the increase over the actual levy amount from the previous year is $ 138,947 (one
hundred thirty-eight thousand nine hundred forty-seven dollars), which is a percentage increase of
1% (one percent) from the previous year. This increase is exclusive of additional revenue resulting
Page 167 of 306
Ordinance – 2025 Ad Valorum Tax - 2
from new construction, improvements to property, any increase in assessed value due to
construction of wind turbine, solar, biomass and geothermal facilities, if the facilities are not state
assessed, any increase in the value of state-assessed property, any annexations that have occurred,
any refunds made, and increment value associated with an established Tax Increment Financing
Area.
Section 3. Transmittal. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a
certified copy of this Ordinance to the Franklin County Assessor on or before November 30, 2024.
Section 4. General Authorization and Ratification. The City Manager, the Finance
Director of the City, the City Clerk and other appropriate officers of the City, and each of them
acting alone, are authorized and directed to take any action and to execute any document as in their
judgment may be necessary or desirable to effectuate the provisions of this Ordinance. All prior
actions in furtherance of and consistent with the terms of this Ordinance are ratified and confirmed.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word
of this Ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this
Ordinance.
Section 6. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this Ordinance, including scrivener’s errors
or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or
numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take full force and
effect five (5) days after approval, passage, and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of
______________, 2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ________________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Published: _____________________________
Page 168 of 306
Ordinance – 2025 Ad Valorum Tax - 1
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
PROVIDING FOR A ONE PERCENT INCREASE, PLUS THE BANKED
CAPACITY OF FOUR PERCENT IN THE REGULAR PROPERTY TAXES OF
THE CITY FOR LEVY IN 2024 AND COLLECTION IN THE 2025 TAX YEAR;
AND PROVIDING FOR RELATED MATTERS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings and Determinations. The City Council of the City of Pasco,
Washington (City), makes the following findings and determinations:
(a) RCW 84.55.120(1) provides that the City Council must hold a public hearing on
revenue sources for the following year’s current expense budget and that the hearing
must include consideration of possible increases in property tax revenues and must be
held prior to the time the City levies the taxes.
(b) RCW 84.55.120(3) provides that the City may not authorize an increase in property tax
revenue from the previous year except by adoption of a separate ordinance or
resolution, pursuant to notice, specifically authorizing the increase in terms of both
dollars and percentage.
(c) Pursuant to proper notice, the City Council held a public hearing (Hearing) on October
21, 2024, to consider the City’s 2025 revenue sources, along with consideration of
possible increases in property tax revenues.
(d) The City’s actual levy amount from the previous year was $13,314,947.
(e) The City has a population that is greater than 10,000.
The City Council, after the Hearing and after duly considering all relevant evidence and
testimony presented, determined that the City requires increase in property tax revenue from the
previous year, in addition to revenue resulting from the addition of new construction and
improvements to property, newly constructed wind turbines, solar, biomass and geothermal
facilities, if the facilities are not state assessed, any increase in the value of state-assessed property,
any annexations that have occurred and any refunds made, in order to discharge the expected
expenses and obligations of the City and in its best interest , and increment value associated with
established Tax Increment Financing Area.
Section 2. Property Tax Increase Authorized. An increase in the regular property
tax levy of the City is authorized for the levy to be collected in the 2025 tax year. The dollar
amount of the increase over the actual levy amount from the previous year is $718,738 (seven
hundred eighteen thousand seven hundred thirty-eight dollars) which is a percentage increase of 5
Page 169 of 306
Ordinance – 2025 Ad Valorum Tax - 2
(five percent) from the previous year. This increase is exclusive of additional revenue resulting
from new construction, improvements to property, any increase in assessed value due to
construction of wind turbine, solar, biomass and geothermal facilities, if the facilities are not state
assessed, any increase in the value of state-assessed property, any annexations that have occurred,
any refunds made, and increment value associated with established Tax Increment Financing Area.
Section 3. Transmittal. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a
certified copy of this Ordinance to the Franklin County Assessor on or before November 30, 2024.
Section 4. General Authorization and Ratification. The City Manager, the Finance
Director of the City, the City Clerk and other appropriate officers of the City, and each of them
acting alone, are authorized and directed to take any action and to execute any document as in their
judgment may be necessary or desirable to effectuate the provisions of this Ordinance. All prior
actions in furtherance of and consistent with the terms of this Ordinance are ratified and confirmed.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word
of this Ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this
Ordinance.
Section 6. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this Ordinance, including scrivener’s errors
or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or
numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take full force and
effect five (5) days after approval, passage, and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of
______________, 2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ________________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Published: _____________________________
Page 170 of 306
November 4,
2024
Pasco City Council
Regular Meeting
Pa
g
e
1
7
1
o
f
3
0
6
Property Tax Levy
2025 Collection
November 4,
2024
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
1
7
2
o
f
3
0
6
3
Property Tax Levy 2025 Collection
Pa
g
e
1
7
3
o
f
3
0
6
4
Property Tax Levy 2025 Collection
Pa
g
e
1
7
4
o
f
3
0
6
•Regardless of levy option
approved, collections
earmarked for Tax
Increment Financing (TIF)
Area benefit will be
disbursed to the Port of
Pasco and City of Pasco
and restricted for payment
of outstanding bond debt.
•Value of TIF collections is
$441,547 in 2025 and not
available for general
government operations.
5
Tax Increment Financing Impact
Pa
g
e
1
7
5
o
f
3
0
6
6
Property Tax Levy 2025 Collection
Levy value determination directly impacts General Fund
revenues and therefore, 2025 – 2026 budget.
Preliminary 2025-2026 biennial budget reflects Option C. This
option incorporates the value of new 2024 construction, 1% of
highest lawful levy, TIF Area increment appreciation value and
recapture of banked capacity in the levy calculation.
Levy value must be approved by Council and certified to
Franklin County Assessor’s Office no later than November 30,
2024.
Pa
g
e
1
7
6
o
f
3
0
6
Questions?Pa
g
e
1
7
7
o
f
3
0
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 30, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Darcy Buckley, Finance Director
Finance
SUBJECT: *Resolution No. 4519 - Segregation of Local Improvement District No.
150 Assessment (5 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION:Local to relating No. 4519, approve to move I Resolution
Improvement District No.150; providing for the segregation of assessments for
certain RCW with consistent Hill, Chapel as to referred parcels, Asmus
35.44.410; and, ratifying and confirming prior acts.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
On August 20, 2018, the Council created Local Improvement District No. 150
(LID No. 150) to finance the cost of constructing Chapel Hill Boulevard
improvements. The final assessment roll for LID No. 150 was confirmed and
approved roll assessment final to the 2019. 1, April on Subsequent
confirmation, a number of properties within the LID have been subdivided
through final plat approval.
V. DISCUSSION:
Since final assessment roll approval of LID 151, composition of property
boundaries This is action subdivision. and changed has ownership with
improvement necessary to appropriately align outstanding local district
assessment with amended properties and comply with state law. State law
requires that City Council approve the segregation of LID assessments in the
Page 178 of 306
event of a subdivision of property within the LID. Council determines that
assessments against the subdivided parcels may be assessed as nearly as
possible on the same basis as the original assessments were levied, and the
total of the segregated parts of the assessment equals the assessment
amounts before segregation. Based on the recommendations of bond counsel,
staff is recommending approval the of the segregation of one parcel into three
assessments against three parcels associated with LID No. 150 as of
November 4, 2024.
Page 179 of 306
Resolution – LID NO. 150 Segregation Asmus Chapel Hill - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
RELATING TO LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 150; PROVIDING
FOR THE SEGREGATION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN PARCELS,
REFERRED TO AS ASMUS CHAPEL HILL, CONSISTENT WITH RCW
35.44.410; AND RATIFYING AND CONFIRMING PRIOR ACTS.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 4393 passed on August 20, 2018, the City Council
of the City of Pasco, Washington (City), created Local Improvement District No. 150 (LID No.
150) to finance the cost of constructing Chapel Hill Boulevard improvements; and
WHEREAS, on April 1, 2019, the final assessment roll for LID No. 150 was confirmed
by Ordinance No. 4429; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the final assessment roll confirmation, a number of properties
within the LID have been subdivided through final plat approval; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.44.410 provides that whenever land against which there has been
levied a special assessment has been sold in part or subdivided, the legislative authority of that
City has the power to order a segregation of the assessment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that assessments against the subdivided parcels
may be assessed as nearly as possible on the same basis as the original assessments were levied,
and the total of the segregated parts of the assessment equals the assessment amounts before
segregation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the following parcels in LID No. 150 are segregated for assessment.
Be It Further Resolved, the assessment against Tax Parcel No. 117510033 is segregated
into three assessments against three parcels as shown on Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that City staff is directed to implement this Resolution and take
all actions necessary and appropriate to segregate the assessments, including recording of this
Resolution, as detailed in Exhibits A.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 180 of 306
Resolution – LID NO. 150 Segregation Asmus Chapel Hill - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of
______________, 2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 181 of 306
Exhibit A
Property Description Parcel No.
Acre
per lot
Total
Assessment
LOT 1 OF RECORD SURVEY 1847849 0 117510033 33.39 604,478.56$ Subdivided into 3 lots
Record of Survey 1980270 117511400 16.90 310,130.04$
Record of Survey 1980270 117511401 10.78 197,822.68$
Record of Survey 1980270 117511402 5.26 96,525.85$
Page 182 of 306
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 30, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Darcy Buckley, Finance Director
Finance
SUBJECT: Resolutions Nos. 4520, 4521, & 4522 - Segregation of Local
Improvement District No. 151 Assessment (5 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolutions with Exhibits
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION:Local to relating 4520, No. to approve move I Resolution
Improvement District No.151; providing for the segregation of assessments for
certain parcels, referred to as Broadmoor, consistent with RCW 35.44.410;
and, ratifying and confirming prior acts.
MOTION:4521, Local to relating No. approve to move I Resolution
Improvement District No.151; providing for the segregation of assessments for
certain parcels, referred to as Barker Estates, consistent with RCW 35.44.410;
and, ratifying and confirming prior acts.
MOTION:Resolution Local to relating 4522, No. approve to move I
Improvement District No.151; providing for the segregation of assessments for
certain parcels, referred to as Rocky Hills, consistent with RCW 35.44.410;
and, ratifying and confirming prior acts.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
On March 2, 2020, Council ordered the creation of a Local Improvement
District No. 151 (LID No. 151) to finance the cost of design and construction of
the Northwest Area sanitary sewer trunk and related improvements. This
project resulted in the installation of approximately 12,000 linear feet of trunk
Page 183 of 306
sewer piping from Harris Road to one-quarter mile north of Burns Road. The
final assessment roll for LID No. 151 was confirmed and approved at the
council meeting of October 3rd, 2022. Subsequent to the final assessment roll
confirmation, a number of properties within the LID have been subdivided
through final plat approval.
V. DISCUSSION:
Since final assessment roll approval of LID No. 151, composition of property
boundaries and ownership has changed with subdivision. This action is
district improvement local outstanding necessary appropriately to align
assessment with amended properties and comply with state law. State law
requires that Council approve the segregation of LID assessments in the event
of LID. that determines Council the a property of subdivision within
assessments against the subdivided parcels may be assessed as nearly as
possible on the same basis as the original assessments were levied, and the
total of the segregated parts of the assessment equals the assessment
amounts before segregation. Based on the recommendations of bond counsel,
staff parcels is recommending approval the of the segregation of four
associated with LID No. 151 as of November 4, 2024.
Page 184 of 306
Resolution – LID No. 151 Segregation Broadmoor - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
RELATING TO LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 151; PROVIDING
FOR THE SEGREGATION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN PARCELS
REFERRED TO AS BROADMOOR, CONSISTENT WITH RCW 35.44.410;
AND RATIFYING AND CONFIRMING PRIOR ACTS.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 4483A passed on March 2, 2020, the City Council
of the City of Pasco, Washington (City), created Local Improvement District No. 151 to finance
the cost of designing and constructing the Northwest Area sanitary sewer trunk, approximately
12,000 linear feet of trunk sewer piping from Harris Road to one-quarter mile north of Burns Road;
and
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2022, the final assessment roll for LID No. 151 was confirmed
by Ordinance No. 4612; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the final assessment roll confirmation, a number of properties
within the LID have been subdivided through final plat approval; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.44.410 provides that whenever land against which there has been
levied a special assessment has been sold in part or subdivided, the legislative authority of that
City has the power to order a segregation of the assessment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that assessments against the subdivided parcels
may be assessed as nearly as possible on the same basis as the original assessments were levied,
and the total of the segregated parts of the assessment equals the assessment amounts before
segregation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the assessment against Tax Parcel No. 115210022 is segregated into 17 assessments
against 17 parcels as shown on Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, the assessment against Tax Parcel No. 115210033 in Exhibit A
is segregated into two assessments against two parcels as shown on Exhibit B.
Be It Further Resolved, the assessment against Tax Parcel No. 115210037 and Tax Parcel
No. 115210047 in Exhibit A are combined and subsequently segregated into seven assessments
against seven parcels as shown in Exhibit C.
Be It Further Resolved, the assessment against Tax Parcel No. 115210038 in Exhibit A
is segregated into 67 assessments against 67 parcels as shown in Exhibit D.
Page 185 of 306
Resolution – LID No. 151 Segregation Broadmoor - 2
Be It Further Resolved, the assessment against Tax Parcel Nos. 115210042, 115210044,
115210045, and 115210048 in Exhibit A are combined and subsequently segregated into nine
assessments against nine parcels as shown in Exhibit E. Segregation of parcels occurred following
payment toward first installment of LID No. 151 assessments. Therefore, the distributed
assessments address only the remaining assessments due. This value equals $483,821.80.
Be It Further Resolved, that City staff is directed to implement this Resolution and take
all actions necessary and appropriate to segregate the assessments, including recording of this
Resolution, as detailed in Exhibits A, B, C, D and E, and
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of
______________, 2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 186 of 306
Exhibit A
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No. Acre per lot Total Assessment
ALL FR 7-9-29 LESS EASEMENT & EXC PTN TO ST OF WA FOR
SR I-82 (PARC EL 5-04295) EXC TH PTN SE 7-9-29 LY SLY OF ST
HWY 1-182 EXC E748.97' THEREOF AND TH PTN S30' OF SE 7-
9-29 LY ELY CTRLN FR COUNTY IRR DIST CANAL R/W LESS
TRACT 1 OF RS #1728137 AND EXC PTN FOR DENT (1725816)151-000-000 115210022 450.61 2,261,524.62$
Parcel divided
into 17 lots
PARCEL 1 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-001 115210031 18.5 90,633.35$
PARCEL 2 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-002 115210032 18.49 90,576.97$
PARCEL 3 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-003 115210033 19.32 94,629.57$
PARCEL 4 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-004 115210034 26.83 131,461.19$
PARCEL 5 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-005 115210035 26.69 130,771.07$
PARCEL 6 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-006 115210036 27.78 136,074.16$
PARCEL 7 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-007 115210037 59.19 289,983.02$
PARCEL 8 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-008 115210038 47.37 286,060.05$
PARCEL 9 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-009 115210039 40.03 196,125.61$
PARCEL 10 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-010 115210040 29.02 142,150.73$
PARCEL 11 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-011 115210041 9.66 47,331.87$
PARCEL 12 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-012 115210042 17.41 85,279.15$
PARCEL 13 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-013 115210043 11.88 58,191.77$
PARCEL 14 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-014 115210044 35.14 172,157.61$
PARCEL 15 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-015 115210045 48.84 239,249.76$
PARCEL 16 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-016 115210047 6.92 33,903.27$
PARCEL 17 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-017 115210048 7.54 36,945.47$
Pa
g
e
1
8
7
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit B
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No. Acre per lot Total Assessment
151-000-001 115210033 19.32 94,629.57$
Parcel was divided
into two lots
SHORT PLAT 2022-
29 LOT 1 EXCEPT
THE NORTH 10
FEET TO THE CITY
OF PASCO AFN-
1972986 151-000-186 115210050 11.79 62,678.80$
SHORT PLAT 2022-
29 LOT 2 151-000-187 115210051 6.01 31,950.77$
Page 188 of 306
Exhibit C Exhibit C
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No.
Acre
per lot
Total
Assessment
LOT 7 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-007 115210037 58.38 289,983.02$
LOT 17 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-016 115210047 5.89 33,903.27$
151-000-323 115210052 6.04 30,457.16$
151-000-324 115210053 5.00 25,203.61$
151-000-325 115210054 12.24 61,721.57$
151-000-326 115210055 14.22 71,677.97$
151-000-327 115210056 15.83 79,790.65$
151-000-328 115210057 5.92 29,831.71$
151-000-329 115210058 5.00 25,203.61$
Combined and
subdivided into
7 lots.
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST,
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF
PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
Page 189 of 306
Exhibit D
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No.
Acre per
lot
Total
Assessment
PARCEL 8 OF RECORD
SURVEY #1956316 151-000-008 115210038 47.37 286,060.05$ Subdivided into 67 lots
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 1 151-000-188 115210061 0.18 1,161.40$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 2 151-000-189 115210062 0.13 840.27$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 3 151-000-190 115210063 0.13 852.52$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 4 151-000-191 115210064 0.13 850.55$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 5 151-000-192 115210065 0.13 848.44$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 6 151-000-193 115210066 0.13 846.47$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 7 151-000-194 115210067 0.13 844.35$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 8 151-000-195 115210068 0.13 842.23$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 9 151-000-196 115210069 0.13 854.49$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 10151-000-197 115210070 0.18 1,156.41$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 11151-000-198 115210071 0.13 868.10$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 12151-000-199 115210072 0.12 821.21$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 13151-000-200 115210073 0.12 821.06$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 14151-000-201 115210074 0.12 820.91$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 15151-000-202 115210075 0.12 820.60$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 16151-000-203 115210076 0.12 820.45$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 17151-000-204 115210077 0.16 1,059.75$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 18151-000-205 115210078 0.13 848.59$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 19151-000-206 115210079 0.13 833.16$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 20151-000-207 115210080 0.13 833.16$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 21151-000-208 115210081 0.13 833.16$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 22151-000-209 115210082 0.13 833.16$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 23151-000-210 115210083 0.13 833.16$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 24151-000-211 115210084 0.13 833.16$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 25151-000-212 115210085 0.13 833.16$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 26151-000-213 115210086 0.13 833.16$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 27151-000-214 115210087 0.13 848.59$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 28151-000-215 115210088 0.16 1,059.75$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 29151-000-216 115210089 0.22 1,476.33$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 30151-000-217 115210090 0.14 925.73$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 31151-000-218 115210091 0.12 771.44$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 32151-000-219 115210092 0.12 771.44$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 33151-000-220 115210093 0.12 771.44$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 34151-000-221 115210094 0.12 771.44$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 35151-000-222 115210095 0.12 771.44$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 36151-000-223 115210096 0.12 771.44$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 37151-000-224 115210097 0.12 771.44$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 38151-000-225 115210098 0.12 771.44$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 39151-000-226 115210099 0.12 771.44$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 40151-000-227 115210100 0.17 1,136.89$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 41151-000-228 115210101 0.18 1,205.11$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 42151-000-229 115210102 0.12 811.68$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 43151-000-230 115210103 0.12 807.29$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 44151-000-231 115210104 0.12 802.91$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 45151-000-232 115210105 0.12 798.37$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 46151-000-233 115210106 0.12 793.98$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 47151-000-234 115210107 0.12 789.59$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 48151-000-235 115210108 0.12 785.06$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 49151-000-236 115210109 0.12 780.67$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 50151-000-237 115210110 0.12 776.28$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 51151-000-238 115210111 0.13 864.17$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 52151-000-239 115210112 0.23 1,497.51$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 53151-000-240 115210113 0.17 1,150.51$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 54151-000-241 115210114 0.12 769.93$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 55151-000-242 115210115 0.11 756.47$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 56151-000-243 115210116 0.11 749.66$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 57151-000-244 115210117 0.12 819.24$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 58151-000-245 115210118 0.14 893.06$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 59151-000-246 115210119 0.12 795.19$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 60151-000-247 115210120 0.12 795.19$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 61151-000-248 115210121 0.20 1,348.06$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 62151-000-249 115210122 0.13 869.76$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 63151-000-250 115210123 0.13 869.76$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 64151-000-251 115210124 0.13 869.76$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 65151-000-252 115210125 0.13 869.76$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 , Lot 66151-000-253 115210126 0.13 869.76$
THE DUNES PHASE 1 TRACT 151-000-254 115210127 34.59 227,887.97$
Page 190 of 306
Exhibit E
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No.
Acre per
lot
Total
Assessment
PARCEL 12 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-012 115210042 15.24 85,279.15$
PARCEL 14 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-014 115210044 30.62 172,157.61$
PARCEL 15 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-015 115210045 46.4 239,249.76$
PARCEL 17 OF RECORD SURVEY #1956316 151-000-017 115210048 6.17 36,945.47$
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE
NORTHWEST OF THE SOUTHEAST OF SECTION 7,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN
COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED
RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL
SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT
PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S
FILE NUMBER 1956316. EXCEPT: THE SOUTH 212.64
FEET OF SAID LOT 12 EXCEPT: THE PORTIONS OF SAID
LOT 12 DEDICATED FOR ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY PER
DEEDS RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBERS 1972746 AND 1972747.
HAVING AN AREA OF 11.10 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS
AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO KNOWN AS
NEW LOT 12 OF PLAT EXEMPTION SEGREGATION
SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 580
THROUGH 582, UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S
FILE NUMBER 1989509)151-000-330 115210211 11.1 54,555.28$
Combined and
subdivided into 9 lots
Pa
g
e
1
9
1
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit E
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST
OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST
QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5
INCH UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
BRASS CAP STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE
NORTH 89°33'30" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A
DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 18 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN
VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316
AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH
00°00'36" EAST ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID
LOT 18 A DISTANCE OF 365.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SANDIFUR PARKWAY DEDICATED
PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1977008 BEING A POINT ON
THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TURNING TO THE
LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 850.08 FEET; THE RADIUS
POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 12°41'19" EAST;
THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID SOUTH RIGHT-
OF-WAY, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 189.01 FEET, 151-000-331 115210212 13.81 67,874.63$
Pa
g
e
1
9
2
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit E
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED
STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION BRASS CAP
STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH
89°33'30" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE
OF 1,804.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT
15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS
AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH
00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID
LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 695.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
89°58'30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 240.92 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°58'30"
EAST A DISTANCE OF 546.56 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-
OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST ALONG SAID WEST
RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 398.88 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 89°33'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 399.59 FEET
TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT CURVE
TURNING TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 510.05 151-000-332 115210213 5 24,574.45$
Pa
g
e
1
9
3
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit E
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED
STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION BRASS CAP
STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH
89°33'30" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE
OF 1,804.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT
15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS
AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH
00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID
LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 1,967.43 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'24" EAST
A DISTANCE OF 787.83 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST ALONG SAID WEST
RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 552.99 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 89°59'24" WEST A DISTANCE OF 787.68 FEET
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA
OF 10.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO
COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND 151-000-333 115210214 10 49,148.90$
Pa
g
e
1
9
4
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit E
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
7, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED
STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION BRASS CAP
STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH
89°33'30" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE
OF 1,804.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT
15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS
AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH
00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID
LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 2,623.39 FEET TO THE NORTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF HARRIS ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID
AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY AND THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'38" EAST ALONG
SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 306.97
FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A TANGENT
CURVE TURNING TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF
950.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING AN
ARC LENGTH OF 504.37 FEET, WITH A DELTA ANGLE OF
30°25'10", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 74°47'47"
EAST, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 498.47 FEET TO THE 151-000-334 115210215 11.65 57,258.47$
Pa
g
e
1
9
5
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit E
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE WEST HALF OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 9
NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE
MERIDIAN IN CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY,
STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A NAIL IN
CONCRETE IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF HARRIS ROAD
AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH
89°33'30" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE
OF 1,764.25 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 12
OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS
AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH
00°00'00" WEST ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARIES OF
LOTS 12 AND 14 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY A DISTANCE OF 1,396.42 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00"
WEST A DISTANCE OF 850.22 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-
OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED RECORDED UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST ALONG SAID EAST
RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 575.05 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 90°00'00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 850.27 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA OF
11.22 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, 151-000-335 115210216 11.22 55,145.07$
Pa
g
e
1
9
6
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit E
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN
COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE EAST
QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A NAIL IN
CONCRETE IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF HARRIS ROAD
AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH
89°33'30" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE
OF 1,764.25 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 12
OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR EXEMPT
PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS
AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316; THENCE SOUTH
00°00'00" WEST ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARIES OF
LOTS 12 AND 14 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY A DISTANCE OF 1,710.38 FEET TO THE NORTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF HARRIS ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID
AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY AND THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING THENCE SOUTH 49°21'22" WEST
ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF
742.36 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108
PER DEED RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH
42°58'57" WEST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY A
DISTANCE OF 420.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" 151-000-336 115210217 11.43 56,177.20$
Pa
g
e
1
9
7
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit E
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN
COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 212.64 FEET OF
LOT 12 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF SURVEY FOR
EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF
SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316 AND THE NORTH
362.36 FEET OF LOT 14 OF SAID AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY. EXCEPT: THE PORTION OF SAID LOT 14
DEDICATED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PER DEED
RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE
NUMBER 1972747. HAVING AN AREA OF 11.23 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS,
EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (ALSO
KNOWN AS NEW LOT 32 OF PLAT EXEMPTION
SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 4 OF
SURVEYS AT PAGES 580 THROUGH 582, UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR’S FILE NUMBER 1989509)151-000-337 115210218 11.23 55,194.22$
Pa
g
e
1
9
8
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit E
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP
9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE
MERIDIAN, CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEING A 2.5 INCH UNITED
STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION BRASS CAP
STAMPED: "S12-S7 1/4 1939"; THENCE NORTH
89°33'30" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE
OF A DISTANCE OF 1,804.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE AMENDED RECORD OF
SURVEY FOR EXEMPT PARCEL SEGREGATION FILED IN
VOLUME 4 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 267-271 UNDER
FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 1956316;
THENCE SOUTH 00°00'36" WEST ALONG THE WEST
BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 1,414.43
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
SOUTH 89°59'24" EAST A DISTANCE OF 787.68 FEET TO
THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROAD 108 PER DEED
RECORDED UNDER FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE
NUMBER 1972747; THENCE NORTH 00°00'19" WEST
ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF
718.95 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°58'30" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 787.48 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING. HAVING AN AREA OF 13.00 ACRES, MORE
OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, 151-000-338 115210219 13 63,893.57$
Pa
g
e
1
9
9
o
f
3
0
6
Resolution – LID No. 151 Barker- 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON.
RELATING TO LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 151; PROVIDING
FOR THE SEGREGATION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN PARCELS,
REFERRED TO AS BARKER ESTATES, CONSISTENT WITH RCW
35.44.410; AND RATIFYING AND CONFIRMING PRIOR ACTS.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 4483A passed on March 2, 2020, the City Council
of the City of Pasco, Washington (City), created Local Improvement District No. 151 to finance
the cost of designing and constructing the Northwest Area sanitary sewer trunk, approxi mately
12,000 linear feet of trunk sewer piping from Harris Road to one-quarter mile north of Burns Road;
and
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2022, the final assessment roll for LID No. 151 was confirmed
by Ordinance No. 4612; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the final assessment roll confirmation, a number of properties
within the LID have been subdivided through final plat approval; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.44.410 provides that whenever land against which there has been
levied a special assessment has been sold in part or subdivided, the legislative authority of that
City has the power to order a segregation of the assessment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that assessments against the subdivided parcels
may be assessed as nearly as possible on the same basis as the original assessments were levied,
and the total of the segregated parts of the assessment equals the assessment amounts before
segregation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the assessment against Tax Parcel 115180073 is segregated into four assessments
against four parcels as shown on Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, the assessment against Tax Parcel No. 115180078 in Exhibit A
is segregated into 103 assessments against 103 parcels as shown on Exhibit B.
Be It Further Resolved, the assessment against Tax Parcel Nos. 115180075, 115180076
and 115180077 in Exhibit A and Tax Parcel No. 115180403 in Exhibit B are combined and
subsequently segregated into 68 assessments against 68 parcels as shown in Exhibit C.
Be It Further Resolved, the assessment against Tax Parcel Nos. 115210042, 115210044,
115210045, and 115210048 in Exhibit A are combined and subsequently segregated into nine
assessments against nine parcels as shown in Exhibit D.
Page 200 of 306
Resolution – LID No. 151 Barker- 2
Be It Further Resolved, that City staff is directed to implement this Resolution and take
all actions necessary and appropriate to segregate the assessments, including recording of this
Resolution, as detailed in Exhibits A, B, and C.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of
____________________, 2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 201 of 306
Exhibit A
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No.
Acre
per lot
Total
Assessment
FARM UNIT 99, IRR BLK 1 151-000-000B 115180073 111.12 333,710.96$ Subdivided into 4 lots
LOT 2 AND A PORTION OF 151-000-075 115180075 34.61 103,952.58$
A PORTION OF LOT 3 OF S 151-000-076 115180076 21.87 65,673.36$
SHORT PLAT 2020-22 LOT 151-000-077 115180077 26.73 80,287.98$
Short Plat 2020-22 Lot 5 151-000-078 115180078 27.90 83,797.04$
Page 202 of 306
Exhibit B
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No. Acre per lot
Total
Assessment
Short Plat 2020-22 Lot 5 151-000-078 115180078 27.9 83,797.04$ Subdivided into 103 lots
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 1 151-000-083 115180301 0.19 712.02$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 2 151-000-084 115180302 0.17 626.08$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 3 151-000-085 115180303 0.17 625.83$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 4 151-000-086 115180304 0.29 1,083.36$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 5 151-000-087 115180305 0.25 914.04$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 6 151-000-088 115180306 0.17 637.32$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 7 151-000-089 115180307 0.17 637.32$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 8 151-000-090 115180308 0.17 637.32$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 9 151-000-091 115180309 0.17 637.32$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 10 151-000-092 115180310 0.17 637.32$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 11 151-000-093 115180311 0.17 637.32$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 12 151-000-094 115180312 0.17 637.32$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 13 151-000-095 115180313 0.17 637.32$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 14 151-000-096 115180314 0.17 637.32$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 15 151-000-097 115180315 0.17 637.32$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 16 151-000-098 115180316 0.18 667.81$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 17 151-000-099 115180317 0.18 667.81$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 18 151-000-100 115180318 0.18 667.81$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 19 151-000-101 115180319 0.18 667.90$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 20 151-000-102 115180320 0.18 678.72$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 21 151-000-103 115180321 0.20 750.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 22 151-000-104 115180322 0.18 685.02$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 23 151-000-105 115180323 0.16 612.11$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 24 151-000-106 115180324 0.16 602.40$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 25 151-000-107 115180325 0.16 606.07$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 26 151-000-108 115180326 0.16 606.07$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 27 151-000-109 115180327 0.16 606.07$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 28 151-000-110 115180328 0.16 606.07$
Pa
g
e
2
0
3
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit B
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No. Acre per lot
Total
Assessment
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 29 151-000-111 115180329 0.16 607.94$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 30 151-000-112 115180330 0.17 628.72$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 31 151-000-113 115180331 0.17 647.46$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 32 151-000-114 115180332 0.18 649.33$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 33 151-000-115 115180333 0.18 649.33$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 34 151-000-116 115180334 0.18 649.33$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 35 151-000-117 115180335 0.17 645.58$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 36 151-000-118 115180336 0.19 688.85$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 37 151-000-119 115180337 0.21 765.76$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 38 151-000-120 115180338 0.19 691.83$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 39 151-000-121 115180339 0.19 692.68$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 40 151-000-122 115180340 0.19 692.68$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 41 151-000-123 115180341 0.19 692.68$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 42 151-000-124 115180342 0.19 694.30$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 43 151-000-125 115180343 0.19 697.45$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 44 151-000-126 115180344 0.19 698.82$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 45 151-000-127 115180345 0.19 698.82$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 46 151-000-128 115180346 0.19 698.82$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 47 151-000-129 115180347 0.19 698.82$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 48 151-000-130 115180348 0.19 698.82$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 49 151-000-131 115180349 0.19 698.82$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 50 151-000-132 115180350 0.19 688.60$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 51 151-000-133 115180351 0.21 769.68$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 52 151-000-134 115180352 0.19 703.33$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 53 151-000-135 115180353 0.18 654.44$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 54 151-000-136 115180354 0.18 665.60$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 55 151-000-137 115180355 0.18 661.09$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 56 151-000-138 115180356 0.18 661.09$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 57 151-000-139 115180357 0.18 661.09$
Pa
g
e
2
0
4
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit B
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No. Acre per lot
Total
Assessment
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 58 151-000-140 115180358 0.18 661.09$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 59 151-000-141 115180359 0.18 661.09$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 60 151-000-142 115180360 0.18 661.09$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 61 151-000-143 115180361 0.18 661.09$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 62 151-000-144 115180362 0.18 661.09$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 63 151-000-145 115180363 0.18 661.09$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 64 151-000-146 115180364 0.18 661.09$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 65 151-000-147 115180365 0.18 661.09$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 66 151-000-148 115180366 0.18 661.09$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 67 151-000-149 115180367 0.18 661.09$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 68 151-000-150 115180368 0.19 710.74$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 69 151-000-151 115180369 0.19 707.84$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 70 151-000-152 115180370 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 71 151-000-153 115180371 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 72 151-000-154 115180372 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 73 151-000-155 115180373 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 74 151-000-156 115180374 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 75 151-000-157 115180375 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 76 151-000-158 115180376 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 77 151-000-159 115180377 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 78 151-000-160 115180378 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 79 151-000-161 115180379 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 80 151-000-162 115180380 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 81 151-000-163 115180381 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 82 151-000-164 115180382 0.18 661.26$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 83 151-000-165 115180383 0.18 667.13$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 84 151-000-166 115180384 0.18 652.31$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 85 151-000-167 115180385 0.19 708.78$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 86 151-000-168 115180386 0.19 711.08$
Pa
g
e
2
0
5
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit B
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No. Acre per lot
Total
Assessment
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 87 151-000-169 115180387 0.18 662.87$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 88 151-000-170 115180388 0.18 655.04$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 89 151-000-171 115180389 0.18 660.92$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 90 151-000-172 115180390 0.18 660.92$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 91 151-000-173 115180391 0.18 660.92$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 92 151-000-174 115180392 0.18 660.92$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 93 151-000-175 115180393 0.18 660.92$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 94 151-000-176 115180394 0.18 660.92$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 95 151-000-177 115180395 0.18 660.92$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 96 151-000-178 115180396 0.18 660.92$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 97 151-000-179 115180397 0.18 660.92$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 98 151-000-180 115180398 0.18 660.92$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 99 151-000-181 115180399 0.18 660.92$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 100 151-000-182 115180400 0.18 660.92$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 101 151-000-183 115180401 0.17 638.60$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Lot 102 151-000-184 115180402 0.20 733.31$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Tract A 151-000-185 115180403 4.12 15,300.78$
Pa
g
e
2
0
6
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit C
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No.
Acre
per lot
Total
Assessment
SHORT PLAT 2020-22 LOT 4 151-000-077 115180077 25.95 80,287.99$
A PORTION OF LOT 3 OF SHORT PLAT 202 151-000-076 115180076 21.34 65,673.36$
LOT 2 AND A PORTION OF LOT 3 OF SHOR 151-000-075 115180075 32.26 103,952.58$
BARKER RANCH PH 1 & 2-Tract A 151-000-185 115180403 4.12 15,300.78$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 1 151-000-255 115181001 0.19 602.26$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 2 151-000-256 115181002 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 3 151-000-257 115181003 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 4 151-000-258 115181004 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 5 151-000-259 115181005 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 6 151-000-260 115181006 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 7 151-000-261 115181007 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 8 151-000-262 115181008 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 9 151-000-263 115181009 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 10 151-000-264 115181010 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 11 151-000-265 115181011 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 12 151-000-266 115181012 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 13 151-000-267 115181013 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 14 151-000-268 115181014 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 15 151-000-269 115181015 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 16 151-000-270 115181016 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 17 151-000-271 115181017 0.19 602.26$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 18 151-000-272 115181018 0.19 602.26$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 19 151-000-273 115181019 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 20 151-000-274 115181020 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 21 151-000-275 115181021 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 22 151-000-276 115181022 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 23 151-000-277 115181023 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 24 151-000-278 115181024 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 25 151-000-279 115181025 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 26 151-000-280 115181026 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 27 151-000-281 115181027 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 28 151-000-282 115181028 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 29 151-000-283 115181029 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 30 151-000-284 115181030 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 31 151-000-285 115181031 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 32 151-000-286 115181032 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 33 151-000-287 115181033 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 34 151-000-288 115181034 0.19 602.26$
Combined and subdivided
into 68 lots
Pa
g
e
2
0
7
o
f
3
0
6
Exhibit C
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No.
Acre
per lot
Total
Assessment
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 35 151-000-289 115181035 0.19 602.26$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 36 151-000-290 115181036 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 37 151-000-291 115181037 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 38 151-000-292 115181038 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 39 151-000-293 115181039 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 40 151-000-294 115181040 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 41 151-000-295 115181041 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 42 151-000-296 115181042 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 43 151-000-297 115181043 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 44 151-000-298 115181044 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 45 151-000-299 115181045 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 46 151-000-300 115181046 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 47 151-000-301 115181047 0.17 538.86$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 48 151-000-302 115181048 0.17 538.86$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 49 151-000-303 115181049 0.17 538.86$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 50 151-000-304 115181050 0.17 538.86$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 51 151-000-305 115181051 0.20 633.95$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 52 151-000-306 115181052 0.19 602.26$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 53 151-000-307 115181053 0.19 602.26$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 54 151-000-308 115181054 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 55 151-000-309 115181055 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 56 151-000-310 115181056 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 57 151-000-311 115181057 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 58 151-000-312 115181058 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 59 151-000-313 115181059 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 60 151-000-314 115181060 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 61 151-000-315 115181061 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 62 151-000-316 115181062 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 63 151-000-317 115181063 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 64 151-000-318 115181064 0.18 570.56$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1, Lot 65 151-000-319 115181065 0.20 633.95$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1,Tract A 151-000-320 115181066 20.13 63,807.47$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1,Tract B 151-000-321 115181067 17.12 54,266.46$
Barker Ranch 1st Addition Phase 1,Tract C 151-000-322 115181068 34.64 109,832.50$
Pa
g
e
2
0
8
o
f
3
0
6
Resolution – LID No. 151 Segregation Rocky Hills - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
RELATING TO LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 151; PROVIDING
FOR THE SEGREGATION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN PARCELS
REFERRED TO AS ROCKY HILLS, CONSISTENT WITH RCW 35.44.410;
AND RATIFYING AND CONFIRMING PRIOR ACTS.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 4483A passed on March 2, 2020, the City Council
of the City of Pasco, Washington (City), created Local Improvement District No. 151 to finance
the cost of designing and constructing the Northwest Area sanitary sewer trunk, approxi mately
12,000 linear feet of trunk sewer piping from Harris Road to one-quarter mile north of Burns Road;
and
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2022, the final assessment roll for LID No. 151 was confirmed
by Ordinance No. 4612; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the final assessment roll confirmation, a number of properties
within the LID have been subdivided through final plat approval; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.44.410 provides that whenever land against which there has been
levied a special assessment has been sold in part or subdivided, the legislative authority of that
City has the power to order a segregation of the assessment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that assessments against the subdivided parcels
may be assessed as nearly as possible on the same basis as the original assessments were levied,
and the total of the segregated parts of the assessment equals the assessment amounts before
segregation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That Tax Parcel 126160010 in LID 151 is segregated for assessment into 56 assessments
against 56 parcels as shown on Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that City staff is directed to implement this Resolution and take
all actions necessary and appropriate to segregate the assessments, including recording of this
Resolution, as detailed in Exhibits A.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Page 209 of 306
Resolution – LID No. 151 Segregation Rocky Hills - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this __ day of
__________, 2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 210 of 306
Exhibit A
Property Description LID Acct. No.Parcel No.
Acre
per lot
Total
Assessment
FARM UNIT 84, IRR BLK 1 151-000-000A 126160010 136.69 269,475.56$ Subdivided into 56 lots
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 1 151-000-018 126160301 0.24 466.39$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 2 151-000-019 126160302 0.20 401.20$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 3 151-000-020 126160303 0.20 401.59$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 4 151-000-021 126160304 0.25 483.45$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 5 151-000-022 126160305 0.23 457.20$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 6 151-000-023 126160306 0.21 417.99$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 7 151-000-024 126160307 0.25 500.76$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 8 151-000-025 126160308 0.27 523.23$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 9 151-000-026 126160309 0.30 597.06$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 10 151-000-027 126160310 0.30 589.37$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 11 151-000-028 126160311 0.51 996.51$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 12 151-000-029 126160312 0.33 650.49$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 13 151-000-030 126160313 0.35 692.16$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 14 151-000-031 126160314 0.36 708.41$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 15 151-000-032 126160315 0.37 723.87$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 16 151-000-033 126160316 0.44 861.73$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 17 151-000-034 126160317 0.37 734.56$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 18 151-000-035 126160318 0.24 470.89$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 19 151-000-036 126160319 0.20 386.37$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 20 151-000-037 126160320 0.22 437.28$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 21 151-000-038 126160321 0.22 437.28$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 22 151-000-039 126160322 0.18 358.62$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 23 151-000-040 126160323 0.18 358.42$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 24 151-000-041 126160324 0.19 369.43$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 25 151-000-042 126160325 0.19 380.24$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 26 151-000-043 126160326 0.20 384.92$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 27 151-000-044 126160327 0.22 438.45$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 28 151-000-045 126160328 0.20 386.26$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 29 151-000-046 126160329 0.20 386.26$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 30 151-000-047 126160330 0.20 388.93$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 31 151-000-048 126160331 0.20 389.72$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 32 151-000-049 126160332 0.20 385.26$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 33 151-000-050 126160333 0.20 385.26$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 34 151-000-051 126160334 0.20 385.26$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 35 151-000-052 126160335 0.20 385.29$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 36 151-000-053 126160336 0.20 387.00$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 37 151-000-054 126160337 0.20 386.69$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 38 151-000-055 126160338 0.20 386.68$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 39 151-000-056 126160339 0.23 456.23$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 40 151-000-057 126160340 0.23 452.88$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 41 151-000-058 126160341 0.22 438.95$
Page 211 of 306
Exhibit A
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 42 151-000-059 126160342 0.22 438.95$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 43 151-000-060 126160343 0.22 437.35$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 44 151-000-061 126160344 0.22 437.28$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 45 151-000-062 126160345 0.22 437.28$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 46 151-000-063 126160346 0.20 385.23$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 47 151-000-064 126160347 0.20 399.83$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 48 151-000-065 126160348 0.27 541.98$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 49 151-000-066 126160349 0.24 468.97$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 50 151-000-067 126160350 0.27 532.33$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 51 151-000-068 126160351 0.24 468.97$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 52 151-000-069 126160352 0.24 468.97$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 53 151-000-070 126160353 0.27 532.33$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 LOT 54 151-000-071 126160354 0.24 469.09$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 TRACT D 151-000-072 126160356 0.99 1,945.92$
SOLSTICE PHASE 1 TRACT I 151-000-073 126160357 122.59 241,682.56$
Page 212 of 306
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 31, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Adam Lincoln, City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Presentation of 2025-2026 Biennial Budget (25 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Presentations: General Fund Departments including, Community & Economic
Development; funds Capital and funds Engineering; Works Public other
presentations.
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presentation of the City of Pasco 2025-2026 General Fund Biennial Budget
and other funds.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
2025-2026 Biennial Budgets
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Biennial budgeting is the practice of preparing and adopting a budget for a two-
year period. This style of budgeting has been permitting in Washington cities
since 1985. A biennial budget promotes and facilitates long-term financial and
strategic planning - a best practice recommended by Government Finance
Officers (GFOA). General Fund is a primary fund that receives majority of tax
revenue and is used to fund critical City services like Police, Fire, Parks and
Recreation etc.
An overview of General Fund 2025 -2026 preliminary budget was provided the
first meeting of October 2024. As the month has progressed other General
Fund departments have provided reviews of operations, departmental support
for Council goals, budget elements and reductions included in the preliminary
budget, potential impact to 2025-2026 service levels and goal attainment.
Page 213 of 306
V. DISCUSSION:
Following the pattern set in prior October presentations for General Fund
departments, tonight's meeting will include the two remaining departments and
their respective biennial budget and operational highlights. These
presentations will be for Community & Economic Development and Public
Works Engineering.
The City of Pasco has many funds that serve specific purposes in addition to
the General Fund. At the meeting of October 28th, financial history and
budgetary planning for a handful of special revenue funds were presented.
Similarly, during tonight's presentation the remaining special revenue and all
internal service funds will be presented.
At the conclusion of this presentation, all preliminary 2025-2026 budgets will
have been shared with City Council. Based on the values currently included in
the General Fund, a deficit of $6.3M (2025) and $7.5M (2026) results.
At this point in time, Council input on a series of fiscal decisions is necessary.
These considerations include potential cost-of-living adjustment for the coming
biennium, deferral of vehicle replacement savings, and strategic deferral of
hiring for those occasions of position vacancies.
Guided by Council direction, the budget will be amended. In November 2024,
two public hearings will be held before finalization and adoption of 2025-2026
Biennial Budget.
Page 214 of 306
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Regular Meeting
Pa
g
e
2
1
5
o
f
3
0
6
2025-2026
Community and Economic
Development
Initial Budget Overview
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
2
1
6
o
f
3
0
6
Overview
•Department Overview
•2023-2024 Accomplishments
•Organizational Chart
•Historical Staffing
•Budget Impacts
•Annual Operating Costs
•2025-2026 Projects
Pa
g
e
2
1
7
o
f
3
0
6
Department Overview
4
Planning Development
Review Permitting
Code
Enforcement CDBG
Pa
g
e
2
1
8
o
f
3
0
6
2023-2024 Accomplishments
5
Residential Design Standards
Street Connectivity
Billboards
Impact Fee Deferral Program
Public Space and Mobile Vending
Public Arts and Murals
Broadmoor Master Plan & Development Regulation
Downtown Pasco Overlay District
Residential Building Capacity for ADU’s & Missing Middle
Housing
Small Business Relief Program (Downtown)
Downtown Pasco Master Plan and Implementation
Pa
g
e
2
1
9
o
f
3
0
6
Organizational Chart
6
CED Deputy
CED
Director
Development Services Manager
Dev. Services Techs
Construction Manager
Construction
Inspectors
Planners
Senior Planner
Inspection Services
Department
Assistant
Permit Coordinator Lead
Permit
Coordinators
Code Enforcement Lead
Code Officers
Plans Examiner
Building
Inspector
Fire Safety
Inspector
Administrative
Assistant II
CDBG
Pa
g
e
2
2
0
o
f
3
0
6
Historical Staffing
7
Pa
g
e
2
2
1
o
f
3
0
6
Expense History
8
Pa
g
e
2
2
2
o
f
3
0
6
2025-2026 Projects
9
•Traffic Impact Fee Study
•SEPA Threshold Changes
•Traffic Impact Analysis Process Changes
•Simplification of Fees
•Implementation of State Law per RCW 36.70B.080
•Implementation of online application, tracking and
payment system
•Revision of codes and processes for predictability
•Restructuring of department to create Central
Development Center
Pa
g
e
2
2
3
o
f
3
0
6
Questions?Pa
g
e
2
2
4
o
f
3
0
6
2025-2026
Public Works Engineering
Initial Budget Overview
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
2
2
5
o
f
3
0
6
Tonight’s Presentation
Department Overview
2023-2024 Accomplishments
Related Council Goals
Historical Staffing
Annual Operating Costs
Budget Impacts
2025-2026 Projects
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Pa
g
e
2
2
6
o
f
3
0
6
Operations & Engineering
1. Department Overview – Public Works
13
Pa
g
e
2
2
7
o
f
3
0
6
1. Department Overview – Public Works
14
PUBLIC WORKS
DIRECTOR
ENGINEERING MANAGER
Capital Project
Delivery
Long range planning
for Transportation
and Utilities
Funding Pursuit and
Administration
Environmental
Compliance
Traffic
Engineering
OPERATIONS MANAGER
Treatment Plant
Operations
Roadway and Utility
Maintenance
Emergency
response
SUPPORT TEAM
Adm. Services, Financial and
procurement
DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS
DIRECTOR
Pa
g
e
2
2
8
o
f
3
0
6
Operations
15
Pa
g
e
2
2
9
o
f
3
0
6
Engineering
16
Pa
g
e
2
3
0
o
f
3
0
6
•55 Projects Delivered
•66 Active Projects Underway
•$170M Capital Program Delivery
•23 Funding Opportunity Applications Submitted
•$29.3M Grants & Loans Received
•Compliance with WSDOT on grant reimbursements regained
•State and Federal Project Audits Completed
•7 public meetings Held on TIP and CIP
•Media communication related to engineering work increased
2. 2023-2024 Accomplishments
17
Pa
g
e
2
3
1
o
f
3
0
6
QUALITY OF LIFE
Promote a high-quality of life
through quality programs,
services and appropriate
investment and re-investment
in community infrastructure.
3. Related Council Goals
18
COMMUNITY
TRANSPORTATION
NETWORK
Promote a highly functional
multi-modal transportation
system.
Pa
g
e
2
3
2
o
f
3
0
6
4. Historical Staffing
19
Pa
g
e
2
3
3
o
f
3
0
6
Big Spenders/Big Winners
5. Annual Operating Costs
20
Pa
g
e
2
3
4
o
f
3
0
6
Actions taken
•Pooled Resources within Department
•Reduced:
o Overtime
o Printing
o City-issued Cell Phones (voluntary)
o Training and Travel
o Vehicle Replacement Program
6. Budget Impacts
21
Strategic Reduction in Service
•Fewer projects
•Extended timelines
•Non-essential functions reduced
•Consolidated outreach events
What will not be impacted?
•Quality of Work
•Commitment to Safety
•Strategic approach to fundraising
Pa
g
e
2
3
5
o
f
3
0
6
Process Improvements
•Chargeback Process Review
•Streamlined Project
Documentation Processes
•Implement Regular Review of
Rates and Fees
•Stronger Prioritization Process
•Increased clarity on initiatives
to avoid rework
Deliverables
•6th Ave and “A” Street crossing
•Road 40 East extension
•MLK Community Center – Phase 1
•WWTP Improvements Phase 2
•Water Comp Plan
•Comprehensive Roadway Safety
Action Plan
•Complete design of Butterfield WTP –
Early works
•Begin construction on West Pasco
WTP – Phases 3 and 4
•Pavement Preservation on 2 NHS
Routes
7. 2025-2026 Key Projects
22
Pa
g
e
2
3
6
o
f
3
0
6
Thank you!Pa
g
e
2
3
7
o
f
3
0
6
General Fund
Budget Overview
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
2
3
8
o
f
3
0
6
Proposed General Fund Budget
25
2025 2026
Expense 87.6M 86.9M
Revenue 78.7M 79.3M
Subtotal (8.9M)(7.5M)
Bond Proceeds Supported 2.6M
Net Reserve Usage (6.3M)(7.5M)
Additional Items
Add: Cost of Living Adjustment 1.1M 1.8M
Remove: Labor Adjustments (2.4M)(3.4M)
Remove: Vehicle Replacement Deferment (687K)(622K)
Proposed Reserve Usage (4.4M)(5.4M)
Pa
g
e
2
3
9
o
f
3
0
6
•As proposed, assumes sweeping banked capacity &
taking new construction + 1%
•Defer savings for vehicle replacement
•Reduce FTE through vacancies
•Cost of Living Increase not factored in yet
•Additional Items are not included in currently prepared
budget in anticipation of guidance from Council.
Council Direction Needed
26
Pa
g
e
2
4
0
o
f
3
0
6
Questions?Pa
g
e
2
4
1
o
f
3
0
6
Budget Discussion
Internal Service
Funds
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
2
4
2
o
f
3
0
6
•Activity accounts for supply of
goods and services between
City funds
•Fees and rates are established
to cover costs on a break-even
basis
•Useful for long-term cost
accounting
•Provides economies of scale in
service provision and
consistency of accounting and
reporting
•Interfund billing to service
receiver department or fund
allows true operational cost to
provide programs or services
29
Internal Service Funds
Pa
g
e
2
4
3
o
f
3
0
6
30
Purpose: Maintenance of City
vehicles and equipment. Services
provided include routine
maintenance and repairs.
Revenue Sources:
•Interfund charges for services
provided and fuel purchases.
Expense Highlights:
•10.19 FTE budgeted
•Supplies
•Automotive parts
•Tires & batteries
•Tools
•Fuel
•Services
•External vehicle service
•Utilities
•Insurance
Inflation and labor cost increases
are outpacing revenues. Shop
rate analysis will be undertaken
in 2025.
Equipment Operations & Maint. Fund
Pa
g
e
2
4
4
o
f
3
0
6
31
Purpose: Account for
accumulation of annual savings
contributed by governmental
funds in support of vehicle and
equipment replacement based
on useful life and estimated
future cost.
Revenue Sources:
•Interfund contributions
Expense Highlights:
•.25 Finance FTE directly
charged to fund
•Planned purchase of vehicles
and equipment
Equipment Replacement Govt. Fund
Pa
g
e
2
4
5
o
f
3
0
6
32
Purpose: Account for
accumulation of annual savings
contributed by Utility Fund in
support of vehicle and equipment
replacement based on estimated
useful life and future cost.
Revenue Sources:
•Interfund contributions
Expense Highlights:
•.25 Finance FTE directly
charged to fund
•Planned purchase of vehicles
and equipment
Equipment Replacement Util. Fund
Pa
g
e
2
4
6
o
f
3
0
6
•City health insurance is a City funded
plan. While risk is mitigated by a stop
loss policy, all claims exclusive that
protection are paid by the City’s Health
Funds revenues and reserves.
•Rates have not been updated since 2014
•COVID significantly impacted claims
activity
•The Funds must maintain a reserve
valued at 16-weeks of historical claims.
•Employee wellness committee formed in
2024, has been meeting monthly since
June
•Composed of representatives across
City work groups
•Reviewing historical claims data and
associated impact on Funds expenses
•Evaluating plan options and
alternatives, including status as self-
insured plan
•Members serving as ambassador to
respective work groups
33
Health Funds Facts
Pa
g
e
2
4
7
o
f
3
0
6
34
Purpose: Account for medical,
dental and vision insurance
charges, claims and associated
expenses.
Revenue Sources: Plan is City-
insured.
•City paid interfund premiums
per employee
•Employee portion of premium
Expense Highlights:
•Equivalent of 1 FTE directly
charged to medical fund
•Insurance claims
•Professional services, including
•Claims administrator
•Stop loss insurance
•IRS fee related to
Affordable Care Act
16-week reserve as of year end
2023 valued at $2.6M.
Health Benefits Funds
Pa
g
e
2
4
8
o
f
3
0
6
•Estimate of services expense for
2025/2026 is challenging
•Covid caused inconsistency
•Catch up for preventative, and in
some instances necessary, care in
2023
•Existing in 2024 are outstanding
claims due to bankruptcy of claims
processor
•Budget includes estimate of 2024.
2025 and 2026 are each increased
by five percent annually based on
current plan allowances.
•New insurance broker as of mid-2024
•Review and renewal of stop loss
coverage to mitigate risk of large
claims and prescription costs is
underway
•May result in need to increase
budget. Should increased cost
be the outcome, Council will
be apprised of alternatives and
impact to Health and
supporting funds.
35
Health Funds Budget
Pa
g
e
2
4
9
o
f
3
0
6
Questions? Pa
g
e
2
5
0
o
f
3
0
6
Budget Discussion
Other Funds
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
2
5
1
o
f
3
0
6
38
Purpose: Accounting for receipt
of various league and player fees
and administration of league
operations.
Revenue Source:
•Participation fees
•Donations
Expenses Highlights:
•Reassigned staff during
pandemic with curtailed
programs
•Wages are for part-time staff
member
•Supplies and services to
provide league and program
elements
Athletics Fund
Pa
g
e
2
5
2
o
f
3
0
6
39
Purpose: Accounting for funds
received, disbursed or expended
in conjunction with center
operation and maintenance.
Revenue Source:
•Facility Rent and Lease
•Supervision Fees
•Subsidy from General Fund
Expenses Highlights:
• 0.45 FTE
•Supplies and services
•Janitorial
•Repair & maintenance
•Utilities
•Insurance
•Costs associated with capital
improvements for facility are
included in ARPA transfer out
and Capital Improvement
Fund
MLK Center Fund
Pa
g
e
2
5
3
o
f
3
0
6
40
Purpose: Accounting for funds
received and disbursed to support
senior center operations and
programs.
Revenue Source:
•Instruction Fees
•Rent
•General Fund subsidy
Expenses Highlights:
•1.5 FTE
•Supplies and services
•Operating supplies
•Program supplies
•Janitorial service
•Utilities
•Communications
•Insurance
Senior Center Fund
Pa
g
e
2
5
4
o
f
3
0
6
41
Purpose: Accounting for funds
received and expended for
operations and maintenance of
City View Cemetery and associate
service.
Revenue Sources:
•Grave site & related sales
•Interest earnings from
perpetual care fund
•Rates updated in 2024
Expense Highlights:
•1.5 FTE, plus overtime for
weekend or after-hours services
•Supplies and services
•Office supplies
•Chemical supplies
•Janitorial services
•Inventory items
•Utilities
•Insurance
•Vehicle & related
operations cost
Cemetery Fund
Pa
g
e
2
5
5
o
f
3
0
6
42
Purpose: Provide for receipting
and disbursement of Federal grant
funds as set forth by Department
of Housing and Urban
Development
Revenue Sources:
•Grant funds
•2021/2022 ~ COVID
grants
•2021 ~ Loan for Peanuts
Park construction
•Subsidy from General Fund –
Peanuts Park Loan Interest
Expense Highlights: Spending must
meet Federal grant guidelines.
Application for funds are
evaluated based on attainment of
goal to develop viable urban
communities by improving
housing, living environments and
economic opportunities that
benefit low and moderate-income
individuals.
CDBG & Home Funds
Pa
g
e
2
5
6
o
f
3
0
6
43
Purpose: Defray cost and expenses
incurred to complete work of
repair, demolition and clean up of
dangerous buildings and abate
nuisances.
Revenue Sources:
•Abatement reimbursement
•Penalties
Expense Highlights:
•2022 included purchase of
derelict commercial property
•Services to abate properties
•Bad debt expense associated
with non-payment is affecting
fund health
•Delinquent payments are
sent to collection agency
•Property liens recorded at
County
•2025/2026 decrease necessary
due to declining fund balance
Revolving Abatement Fund
Pa
g
e
2
5
7
o
f
3
0
6
44
Purpose: Account for adopt a
highway funds and cost of litter
clean up
Revenue Sources:
•Adopt a Highway sponsors
Expense Highlights:
•Coyote Ridge highway litter
crew services
Program being assessed based on
availability of litter crews.
Current, reserves allow time to
evaluate.
Litter Abatement Fund
Pa
g
e
2
5
8
o
f
3
0
6
45
Purpose: Design, development
and operation of the facility and
adjacent recreation and sporting
fields.
Revenue Sources:
General Fund Subsidy
Expense Highlights:
•Operational subsidy to Franklin
County
HAPO/TRAC Fund
Pa
g
e
2
5
9
o
f
3
0
6
46
Revenue Sources:
•Prior to 2022, sales and
services revenues for all golf
course amenities.
•Beginning in 2022, base lease
revenue fee. Variable lease
income dependent upon
contract language.
Expense Highlights:
•Prior to lease agreement, City
supported all expenses incurred
by contractor for operation,
maintenance and capital.
•With lease contract, all annual
operational & maintenance
cost borne by lessee.
•City contributes $25,000
annually for capital outlays
Reserve balance supportive of
future capital improvements
Sun Willows Golf Course Fund
Pa
g
e
2
6
0
o
f
3
0
6
47
Purpose: Tourism promotion
Revenue Sources:
•Lodging tax collected and
distributed through State shared
revenue process
Expense Highlights:
•All revenues pass through to
Visit Tri-Cities to support tourism
Lodging Fund
Pa
g
e
2
6
1
o
f
3
0
6
48
Purpose: All collected funds
intended to be used for activities
to increase tourism and for
acquisition or operation of
tourism-related facilities.
Revenue Sources:
•Hotel Motel Excise Tax
Expense Highlights:
•Transfer out is supportive of
operations subsidy to
HAPO/TRAC and Gesa
Stadium debt service support,
if necessary.
•Services represent award of
grant funds to benefit tourism
related community events.
Hotel Motel Fund
Pa
g
e
2
6
2
o
f
3
0
6
49
Purpose: Accounting for funds
received and disbursed for economic
development, industrial
development or public infrastructure.
Revenue Source:
•Farm lease revenue
•Regional Facilities District
participation
•Contract concludes in 2027
Expenses Highlights:
•One FTE
•Farm Irrigation Operations &
Maintenance
•Capital Improvements - CIP
•Land purchase and Burden
Soccer Complex
Improvement – Parks
•Pasco Specialty Kitchen
•Farmer’s Market Parking Lot
Revenue of 2021 reflects transfer in
from General Fund to support
potential land purchase.
Economic Development Fund
Pa
g
e
2
6
3
o
f
3
0
6
50
Purpose: Account for funds
received and disbursed in
conjunction with Multi-Modal
Facility located east of City Hall
Revenue Sources:
•Mult-modal transportation tax
•Leases of service providers
Expense Highlights:
•Facility Repair and
maintenance
•Janitorial supplies and services
•Utilities
•Leasehold tax
Multi-Modal Fund
Pa
g
e
2
6
4
o
f
3
0
6
51
Purpose: Account for receipts and
disbursements or expenses for
operations, maintenance and
capital improvements of stadium
facility.
Revenue Sources:
•Lease revenue, base and
variable
•Bond proceeds
Expense Highlights:
•Facility repair and maintenance
•Utilities
•Transfer out to Construction
Fund
•Debt service
•Bonds issued in 2019 and
2023
Stadium Fund
Pa
g
e
2
6
5
o
f
3
0
6
52
Purpose: Account for all funds
received and expended in
accordance with Coronavirus State
and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Revenue Sources:
Dollars received in two installments.
Revenues are earned and recorded
as expended for eligible programs.
Eligible programs must meet
Uniform Guidance for grant
management.
Expense Highlights:
•MLK Center Remodel
•Boys ang Girls Club
Improvements
•Pasco Resource Navigator
program support to Ambulance
Fund
•Workforce training grant through
WSU
•Downtown plan implementation
All grant funding must be under
contract or spent by end of 2024.
ARPA Fund
Pa
g
e
2
6
6
o
f
3
0
6
53
Purpose: Account for funds received
and expended in conjunction with
City’s lease with Army Corps of
Engineers for boat basin and linear
park.
Revenue Sources:
•Lease revenue
•Grants
•Insurance recovery (2018-2020)
Expense Highlights:
•Regular expenses include,
•Janitorial
•Repair & maintenance
•Utilities
•Leasehold tax
•Docks have been separately
damaged by weather events
•Interfund loan for repairs
in 2019.
•Application with FEMA to
requesting grant for second dock
replacement.
Rivershore Trail & Marina Fund
Pa
g
e
2
6
7
o
f
3
0
6
54
Purpose: Account for receipts and
expenditures related to perpetual
maintenance of landscaping and
fencing along designated
boulevards.
Revenue Sources: Fees associated
with various zones within City.
Expense Highlights:
•Support for facilities staff cost
dedicated to boulevard
mowing and irrigation repairs
•2025 – 2026 xeriscape pilot
project will inform potential
for mitigation of ongoing
maintenance cost
Boulevard Maintenance Fund
Pa
g
e
2
6
8
o
f
3
0
6
55
Purpose: Account for receipts and
expenditures of park impact fees for
creation of parks concurrent with
residential development.
Revenue Sources: Impact fees
•Last rate assessment in 2013
•Fee is adjusted annually by
3.25%
•Not keeping pace with cost
inflation
Expense Highlights:
•Transfers out to Construction Fund
for park land purchase, park
construction and improvements.
•CIP Projects for 2025/2026 include,
•Irrigation clock conversion
•Various Trail Improvements
•Memorial Park Playfield
Refurbishment
•Lighted Pickleball Complex
•Sylvester Park Enhancements
Park Development Fund
Pa
g
e
2
6
9
o
f
3
0
6
Questions? Pa
g
e
2
7
0
o
f
3
0
6
2025-2026 EMS Budget
November 4, 2024
Pasco City Council
Pa
g
e
2
7
1
o
f
3
0
6
Table of Contents
1.Staffing History
2.Ambulance Fund
3.Major Expenses
4.Revenue Sources
5.Potential Revenue Sources
Pa
g
e
2
7
2
o
f
3
0
6
Staffing History
59
Fire Personnel Summary (Ambulance Fund)
Number of Employees (FTE's)
Position 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Fire Chief 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Deputy Fire Chief 0.5 1 1 1 1 1
Battalion Chief 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Medical Officer / Captain 1 1 1 1 1 1
Medical / Training Officer Assistant 0 1 1 1 1 1
Community Risk Reduction Specialist 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Captain - Paramedic 6 6 5 5 5 5
Lieutenant 3 3 3 3 3 3
Firefighter - Paramedic 21 21 21 21 21 21
Firefighter 5 5 8 8 19 19
Fire Prevention & Planning Officer 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5
Administrative Assistant II 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Administrative Assistant I 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5
Logistics Manager 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5
Department Assistant II 1 0 0 0 0 0
IS Radio – Vehicle Specialist 0 0 0 0 0.6 0.6
Lead Accountant 0 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Total 40.5 41.75 43.75 44.25 56.85 56.85
Pa
g
e
2
7
3
o
f
3
0
6
Ambulance Fund
60
Pa
g
e
2
7
4
o
f
3
0
6
Major Expenses
61
•Built Station 84
•Larger facility than before and incorporated the Administrative
Staff
•Built Station 85
•Added 12.6 employees for Station 85
Pa
g
e
2
7
5
o
f
3
0
6
Revenue Sources
62
•Monthly Ambulance Availability Rate
•Transport Fees
•Mileage Fees
•Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response
(SAFER)
•Ground Emergency Medical Transport (GEMT)
• Provides Medicaid reimbursements
Pa
g
e
2
7
6
o
f
3
0
6
Potential Revenue Sources
63
•Increase the Ambulance Utility Rate
•Rate study / analysis in 2025
•Increase the Transport and Mileage Fees
•Rate study / analysis in 2025
•Implement a Lift Assist Ordinance
•Increase the subsidy by the General Fund
•Levy Lid lift
Pa
g
e
2
7
7
o
f
3
0
6
Questions?Pa
g
e
2
7
8
o
f
3
0
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council November 1, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/4/24
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Development Review Process Update Presentation
I. REFERENCE(S):
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presentation - Elizabeth Garvin a consultant with Clarion Associates will
provide an update on the development review changes process.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Over the past two decades, the City of Pasco has experienced rapid growth,
resulting in significant increase in development activities. While this growth has
been beneficial, it has also led to several challenges in its development
processes. Specifically, the rapid pace of development has contributed to the
creation of conflicting or unclear codes. Additionally, the department’s workload
has increased to the point where staff have been unable to conduct a thorough
evaluation of Pasco's customer service processes.
Conflicts and Inefficiencies: Due to the City's growth, multiple updates and
amendments have been made to development regulations and zoning codes.
In some cases, these changes have led to inconsistencies or contradictions
between older and newer codes. This lack of clarity makes it difficult for both
developers and staff to ensure compliance, slowing down the development
process. Similarly, fees structures continue to represent a model that is only
sustainable for a City with slower growth. Workload has also prevented ability
make updates to fees to reflect the complexity of the current City.
Workload Impact on Customer Care: Staff has been stretched thin by the
increasing demands of managing the city's rapid development and the
Page 279 of 306
inefficiencies mentioned above. As a result, we have not had the capacity to
review and improve our customer service processes, leading to continued
inefficiencies and frustration among customers and staff.
To improve consistency, transparency, and customer care in the development
review process, the City entered into an agreement with a consulting firm to
assess current procedures and recommend enhancements. The consultant’s
objectives include identifying inefficiencies, addressing inconsistencies in
regulatory requirements, and recommending updates to make the review
process more predictable and user-friendly.
The consultant’s assessment process has included a series of workshops and
collaborative meetings with City staff and the development community. Internal
discussions regulatory efficiency, processing in challenges revealed
interpretation, and interdepartmental communication, while feedback from
developers underscored the need for predictable review times, predictable
fees, These process. application smoother and standards, clearer a
discussions have set the groundwork for the proposed updates aimed at
creating a more supportive and efficient environment for all stakeholders
involved in development projects.
V. DISCUSSION:
At this time, the City’s proposed updates to the development review process
are geared toward enhancing consistency, predictability, and customer service,
with SEPA (State improvements regulatory to focus particular a on
Environmental Policy Act), TIA (Traffic Impact Analysis) requirements, revision
of development fees, and introduction of clear park dedication standards.
In light of new requirements under RCW 36.70B.080, effective January 2025,
which mandates defined timeframes for determining application completeness
and processing permits, the City aims to streamline pre-application processes,
define meet clearer review criteria, and standardize workflows to these
timeframes efficiently. Staff is working with the consultant on ensuring that we
have the proper processes in place to meet the regulatory requirements.
SEPA and TIA Enhancements
The SEPA threshold in Pasco, currently lower than neighboring jurisdictions,
often triggers reviews on minor projects, creating delays that could be avoided
with revised thresholds. Feedback from developers supports aligning Pasco’s
SEPA thresholds with those in Kennewick and Richland, where standards are
better suited to project impact. The City is therefore reviewing options to raise
these thresholds and implement categorical exemptions for minor construction
and housing infill projects, focusing SEPA reviews on larger, higher-impact
developments.
Page 280 of 306
Similarly, TIA requirements have presented challenges due to their linkage with
SEPA, leading to unpredictable processing times. Due to low Traffic Impact
Fees (TIF), City has over relied on TIA process to collect mitigation fees for
critical infrastructure projects. As presented to Council last week, staff is
commencing on a Traffic Impact Fee Study to reduce the number of TIA's
required at the City of Pasco. The proposed update would also decouple TIA
from SEPA, establishing a standalone process for traffic impact reviews. By
defining baseline criteria for when a TIA is needed—based on minimum trip
thresholds—and outlining specific analysis levels (e.g., full TIA, intermediate
TIA, or letter/memo), the City aims to create a more predictable process that
allows developers to understand requirements from the outset.
Additional Pinch Points
Several other consistent challenges, or “pinch points,” have emerged in the
review process.
For developers:
1. Predictability of timeline
2. Predictability of fees
3. Access to check application status
4. Online payment option
For Staff:
1. Objective standards to ensure consistent application of requirements
that can be applied fairly to developers
2. Reduce ambiguity and conflict within codes
3. Provide point of contact that can ensure a smoother experience for
applicants
Path Forward
To be able to improve under the current environment, recommendation is to
implement the "quick fixes" of SEPA threshold change, TIA process change,
new TIF implementation, revision in fees structure, and addition of park and
landscape design standards to relieve pressure on staff and our customers. In
the coming year (6-18 months), the City intends to roll out online application,
tracking and payment options to improve transparency and accessibility for
applicants. These improvements will help create capacity to focus on improved
customer care.
Over the long term, the City aims to develop consistent timelines and fee
structures, reduce process uncertainty, and foster a more customer-centric
development review environment. This approach supports predictable
outcomes for developers and aligns with the City’s commitment to service
excellence, reliable a have residents ensuring developers that and and
transparent experience in navigating the development process.
Page 281 of 306
Pasco Development
Review Assessment 2.0
Processing and Regulatory Updates | November 2024
Pa
g
e
2
8
2
o
f
3
0
6
Project Overview
Review and analyze regulatory policies, processes, and
documents that guide development review process
Identify opportunities for improvements in consistency and
predictability
Focus on enhancing customer service results and project
outcomes
Observation: Improvements to the development review process
almost always require improvements to the development code
standards.
Pasco Staff:
“We serve the
community; we want to
help community
members get through the
process quickly and
efficiently”
Pasco Developers:
“This staff needs an
opportunity to show what
they can do; City could do
some basic things to get
up to speed”
Pa
g
e
2
8
3
o
f
3
0
6
Baseline Permitting
RichlandKennewickPascoBuilding Permits
202420232024202320242023
230218234300309280Single Family Dwelling Unit
(SFDU)
16818539559714411991Residential, Non‐SFDU
356734154Multi‐family
131
(joint)
163
(joint)
263280490510Commercial
Not listedNot listed5064Industrial
Pa
g
e
2
8
4
o
f
3
0
6
Baseline SEPA Review
RichlandKennewickPasco
202420232024202320242023
47615069115 (so far)154SEPA Reviews
Pa
g
e
2
8
5
o
f
3
0
6
Development Process Review Project
2021 Preliminary Development Review Process Assessment
Pasco staff meetings to identify issues with current development review process and
potential solutions
Development community meetings to identify issues and potential solutions
Creation and review of overall process flow chart
Follow‐up meetings with staff and development community
Identify Issues
Double
Check and
Confirm
Resolve
Pa
g
e
2
8
6
o
f
3
0
6
Development
Process Flow
Chart
Review Questions:
•Is it too complex?
•Is information reviewed at the
right point in the process?
•Where do we have mismatched
expectations?
•Where are the pinch points?
Pa
g
e
2
8
7
o
f
3
0
6
New Review Law: RCW 36.70B.080
Effective January 1, 2025
Timely and predictable procedures to determine whether a complete application
meets approval requirements
Development regulations must include specific application content information
needed to comply with the applicable timeframe
Timeframes, starting at determination of completeness:
•Permits that do not require public notice: 65 calendar days
•Permits that require public notice: 100 calendar days
•Permits that require public notice AND public hearing: 170 calendar days
•Multi‐permit and complex projects (“projects of a certain size and type”): 170
days or as amended by City Council
Pa
g
e
2
8
8
o
f
3
0
6
The Clock Starts at Determination of
Completeness
The application is complete and sufficient for processing
(and decision‐making); if:
•Is submitted in the required form,
•Includes all information necessary to decide whether
the application will comply with all applicable PMC
requirements, including all items or exhibits specified
during a pre‐application meeting or staff review, and
•Is accompanied by the applicable fee or fees.
For multipart projects, later applications must be
consistent with any previous plan or permit approvals
that are regulatory and controlling.
Pa
g
e
2
8
9
o
f
3
0
6
Key Questions
What aspects of the process
can be improved PRIOR to the
determination of
completeness?
What aspects of the process
can be standardized to meet
the timeline requirements
FOLLOWING the determination
of completeness?
Pa
g
e
2
9
0
o
f
3
0
6
Pa
g
e
2
9
1
o
f
3
0
6
Pa
g
e
2
9
2
o
f
3
0
6
Pa
g
e
2
9
3
o
f
3
0
6
Pinch Points
DEVELOPERS
SEPA review thresholds
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) review
process
Ability to make online payments
Inability to check application
status
Unpredictability of fees
Unpredictability of timeline
STAFF
Ability to work with applicants to
get to a complete/compliant
application
Need to provide a consistent point
of contact
Lack of objective (measurable)
standards in the regulations make
consistency harder by leaving too
many things open to negotiation
Pasco Staff:
•“Processing efficiency frees up
staff time for people‐facing work”
•“There needs to be a way to speed
up the TIA process”
Pasco Developers:
“Pasco SEPA thresholds are lower
than everyone else in the area,
triggered at a really low level –can
these be brought in line with
Kennewick and Richland?” Pa
g
e
2
9
4
o
f
3
0
6
Getting to Consistency, Predictability, Customer
Service, and Good Project Outcomes
Reduce Uncertainty: Identify who is required
to comply and when
Create Clarity: Establish objective review criteria that
reflect City expectations
Structured Approach to Standard Projects: Set
standards and processes that address the City’s core
application types to allow for more time to review
more complex projects.
Pa
g
e
2
9
5
o
f
3
0
6
Quick Fixes
1.SEPA
Review SEPA thresholds to limit review of
smaller projects (Structured Approach)
2. Traffic Impact Analysis
Establish standard baseline Traffic Impact
Analysis threshold (Structured Approach)
Clarify the TIA scoping process ( Reduce
Uncertainty)
Establish generally applicable decision‐
making review criteria (Create Clarity)
Pa
g
e
2
9
6
o
f
3
0
6
Quick Fixes
1. Simplify Fee Structure
Establish standard development fees
(Reduce Uncertainty)
2.Simplify Park and Open Space Dedication
Draft objective dedication standards
(Reduce Uncertainty)
Establish generally applicable decision‐
making review criteria (Create Clarity)
Pa
g
e
2
9
7
o
f
3
0
6
SEPA Review
PMC
Incorporates statutory categorical exemptions
(baseline exemptions)
Options (Opt‐In Provisions)
Review/confirm applicability of flexible
thresholds for new minor construction projects
Review/confirm applicability of infill and
housing development categorical exemptions
Pa
g
e
2
9
8
o
f
3
0
6
Traffic Impact Analysis
Move from a SEPA‐linked process to a stand‐alone TIA process to
establish clear expectations for staff and applicants and better
predictability for applicants
Review existing triggers to ensure minimum trips are set in the
right place
Document traffic‐related issues that the City wants to address:
Vehicular improvements
Pedestrian improvements
Bicycle improvements
Transit improvements
Adequate public facilities
Establish baseline assumptions for the TIA scoping process
Clarify levels of analysis (full TIA, intermediate TIA, memo or letter,
exemptions) and required types of analysis within the TIA
Identify optional and preferred mitigation measures or
approaches
Pa
g
e
2
9
9
o
f
3
0
6
Development Fees
Simplify Fee Structure
Implement predictable development fees
(Reduce Uncertainty)
Traffic Impact Fees to reduce over reliance on
mitigation fees (Provide Clarity/Reduce
Uncertainty)
Options (Opt‐In Provisions)
Review/confirm applicability of flexible
thresholds for new minor construction projects
Review/confirm applicability of infill and
housing development categorical exemptions
Pa
g
e
3
0
0
o
f
3
0
6
Parks and Open Space Dedication
Criteria
Create predictable dedication criteria
Consider whether to allow payment in
lieu of dedication
Establish in lieu payment calculation
process
Make dedication/fee in lieu decision at
administrative level
Ensure the decision is appealable
Pa
g
e
3
0
1
o
f
3
0
6
Mid Term Vision
Online applications (6‐12 months)
Predictability in timelines (6‐18 months)
Accomplish quick fixes to create staff capacity
Online payments (12‐18 months)
Pa
g
e
3
0
2
o
f
3
0
6
Long Term Vision
Predictability in Costs
Predictability in timelines
Predictability in process
Excellence in customer care
Pa
g
e
3
0
3
o
f
3
0
6
Thanks!
Next Steps:
•City Council input
•Consultant drafts recommended process and code updates
•Anything else you’d like for us to look at?
Pa
g
e
3
0
4
o
f
3
0
6
Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and
appropriate investment and re- investment in community
infrastructure.
City Council Goals
QUALITY OF LIFE
2024-2025
Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services
and programs.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system.
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Implement targeted strategies to reduce crime through strategic
investments in infrastructure, staffing, and equipment.
COMMUNITY SAFETY
Promote and encourage economic vitality.
ECONOMIC VITALITY
Identify opportunities to enhance City of Pasco identity, cohesion,
and image.
CITY IDENTITY
Page 305 of 306
METAS DEL CONCEJO MUNICIPAL
2024-2025
Promover una alta calidad de vida a través de programas, servicios
y inversion apropiada y reinversión en la comunidad infraestructura
comunitaria.
CALIDAD DE VIDA
Promover viabilidad financiera a largo plazo, valor, y niveles de
calidad de los servicios y programas.
SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA
Promover un sistema de transporte multimodal altamente funcional.
RED DE TRANSPORTE DE LA COMUNIDAD
Implementar estrategias específicas para reducir la delincuencia por
medios de inversiones estratégicas en infraestructura, personal y equipo.
SEGURIDAD DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD
Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica.
VITALIDAD ECONOMICA
Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la
cohesión, y la imagen.
IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA
Page 306 of 306