HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024.09.09 Council Workshop Packet
AGENDA
City Council Workshop Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, September 9, 2024
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & GoToWebinar
Page
1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - The Pasco City
Council Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at
www.facebook.com/cityofPasco.
To listen to the meeting via phone, call (914) 614-3221 and use access code
347-125-017.
2. CALL TO ORDER
3. ROLL CALL
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
4. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
5. PUBLIC HEARING
3 - 100 (a) Public Hearing - 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket
(15 minutes)
6. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC
COMMENT – the public may comment on each topic scheduled for
discussion, up to 2 minutes per person with a total of 8 minutes per item. If
opposing sides wish to speak, then both sides receive an equal amount of
time to speak or up to 4 minutes each side.
101 - 117 (a) Presentation - Code Enforcement Program (15 minutes)
Presentation - City of Pasco's Code Enforcement Program by Troy
Hendren, Inspection Services Manager and Rosanna Johnson, Lead
Code Enforcement Officer.
Page 1 of 306
118 - 156 (b) Presentation - Animal Control Authority Structure (10 minutes)
157 - 167 (c) Resolution - I-182 & Broadmoor Boulevard Interchange Project
Change Order No. 7 (5 minutes)
168 - 205 (d) Resolution - Change Order No. 5 for Pasco Water Reuse Facility
Phase 2 Construction Contract with Tapani, Inc. (5 minutes)
206 - 253 (e) 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan Presentation (5 minutes)
254 - 270 (f) First Budget Presentation: Utilities (25 minutes)
271 - 276 (g) Ordinance - Amending PMC Section 3.40.070 Time of Payment of
Impact Fees (5 minutes)
277 - 304 (h) AXON Officer Safety Plan Contract Renewal Presentation (15
minutes)
Captain Brian Vaught will be presenting on the AXON Officer Safety
Plan Contract Renewal.
7. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION
9. ADJOURNMENT
10. ADDITIONAL NOTES
305 - 306 (a) Adopted Council Goals (Reference Only)
(b) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the
City Clerk for assistance.
Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por
favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para
garantizar la disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter
service may be provided upon request. Please provide two
business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.)
Page 2 of 306
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 5, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/9/24
FROM: Jacob Gonzalez, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Public Hearing - 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket (15
minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Exhibit A: CPA2022-003 New Heritage (Industrial to Mixed
Residential/Commercial)
Exhibit B: CPA2023-001 Road 100 & Argent (Low Density Residential to
Medium Density Residential)
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
None
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
With few exemptions, Washington State Law prohibits local jurisdictions from
amending their Comprehensive Plans more than once per calendar year. The
City has established a process outlined in the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC)
Chapter evaluated be to amendments that for allows 25.215 proposed
concurrently, considered the annual docket. The amendment process has two
components consisting of establishing the docket, followed by the evaluation
and recommendation of the docket items.
Summary of Amendments
The 2023 Amendment Docket consists of two items:
CPA2022-003 - New Heritage
o Request: Industrial to Mixed Residential/Commercial
o Docketed: This item was placed on the 2022 Comprehensive
Page 3 of 306
Plan Amendment Docket via Resolution No. 4251 on September
19, 2022. Due to the pending status of the associated
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), no formal decision was
made. The item was thus continued (placed) on the 2023 docket.
o Planning Commission Recommendation: The Pasco Planning
Commission recommended in favor of this item on January 25,
2023, and that it be forwarded to Pasco City Council.
CPA2023-001 - Road 100 & Argent
o Request: Low Density Residential to Mixed
Residential/Commercial
o Docketed: This item was placed on the 2023 Comprehensive
Plan Amendment Docket via Resolution No 4393 on November 6,
2023.
o Planning Commission Recommendation: The Pasco Planning
Commission recommended a denial of this item on May 16, 2024,
and that it be forwarded to Pasco City Council.
o Application Modified: The applicant submitted a memo on August
15, 2024, modifying the amendment request to Medium
Residential Residential, instead of the previously requested
Mixed Residential/Commercial.
The 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket was presented to the City
Council on August 16, 2024. At that meeting, staff provided a summary of the
applications, and also heard from the applicants of each request. A public
hearing was scheduled for September 9, 2024.
Application materials can be accessed here: https://www.pasco-
wa.gov/1242/Comprehensive-Plan-Annual-Amendments
Public notices were distributed in accordance with Pasco Municipal Code on
August 22nd, 2024.
V. DISCUSSION:
Each amendment must be evaluated based on the approval criteria listed
below, which will be considered the official findings.
Approval Criteria PMC Subsection 25.215.020(8)(c)
(i) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public
health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment;
(ii) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter
36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan
not affected by the amendment;
(iii) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or
Page 4 of 306
(iv) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Additional factors for consideration PMC Subsection 25.215.020(9)
(a) The effect upon the physical environment;
(b) The effect on open space and natural features including, but not limited to,
topography, streams, rivers, and lakes;
(c) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding
neighborhoods;
(d) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities, including utilities,
roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools;
(e) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type
and density and the demand for such land;
(f) The current and projected project density in the area; and
(g) The effect, if any, upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
Next Steps:
Following the public hearing and City Council deliberations, staff will prepare
ordinances in accordance with City Council direction.
Page 5 of 306
2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
•Comprehensive Plan:
•Guiding document and set of strategies
•20-year growth management planning
•Adopted 2021
•Amended 2023
•Amendments:
•Once per year
•Emergency amendments allowed (ex: budget)
•Evaluated per PMC criteria
•Concurrent review
Pa
g
e
6
o
f
3
0
6
2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
•Amendment Criteria (PMC 25.215.020):
(i) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health,
safety, welfare, and protection of the environment;
(ii) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A
RCW and with the portion of the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by
the amendment;
(iii) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or
(iv) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the
Comprehensive Plan
Pa
g
e
7
o
f
3
0
6
2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
•Amendment Criteria (PMC 25.215.020):
(a) The effect upon the physical environment;
(b) The effect on open space and natural features including, but not limited to, topography, streams, rivers, and lakes;
(c) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods;
(d) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities, including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools;
(e) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land;
(f) The current and projected project density in the area; and
(g) The effect, if any, upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
Pa
g
e
8
o
f
3
0
6
2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
•Amendment Summary
File Number: CPA2022‐003
New HeritageApplicant:
Future Land Use Map Amendment:
Industrial to Mixed Residential and
Commercial
Description:
I‐2 Medium Industrial DistrictCurrent Zoning:
112470014, 112430012, 112430021,
112462078, 112462096
Address / Parcel(s)
197Total Area (Acres)
Determination of Significance, issued
06/07/2022, EIS Required
Environmental
Determination
Pa
g
e
9
o
f
3
0
6
2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
•Amendment Summary
File Number: CPA2023‐001
Clover Planning, LLCApplicant:
Future Land Use Map
Amendment: Low Density
Residential to Medium Density
Residential
Description:
RS‐20Current Zoning:
118292027, 118292036Address /
Parcel(s)
2.85Total Area
(Acres)
Determination of Non‐
Significance, Issued 06/19/2023
Environmental
Determination
Pa
g
e
1
0
o
f
3
0
6
2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
•Amendment Criteria (PMC 25.215.020):
(i) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health,
safety, welfare, and protection of the environment;
(ii) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A
RCW and with the portion of the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by
the amendment;
(iii) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or
(iv) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the
Comprehensive Plan
Pa
g
e
1
1
o
f
3
0
6
2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
•Amendment Criteria (PMC 25.215.020):
(a) The effect upon the physical environment;
(b) The effect on open space and natural features including, but not limited to, topography, streams, rivers, and lakes;
(c) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods;
(d) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities, including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools;
(e) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land;
(f) The current and projected project density in the area; and
(g) The effect, if any, upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
Pa
g
e
1
2
o
f
3
0
6
Next Steps
2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
September 9, 2024
Public Hearing
~September 16, 2024
Determination/Decision
Pa
g
e
1
3
o
f
3
0
6
Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA2022‐003
File Number: CPA2022‐003
Applicant: Broetje Orchards LLC
Description: Future Land Use Map Amendment: Industrial to Mixed Residential
and Commercial
Current Zoning: I‐2 Medium Industrial District
Address / Parcel E A Street/112470014, 112430012, 112430021, 112462078,
112462096
Total Area (Acres) 197
Environmental Determination
SEPA 2022‐038 Determination of Significance, issued 06/07/2022,
Final Environmental Impact Statement dated 6/4/2024 prepared by
Land Strategies, and J‐U‐B Engineers, Inc.
Page 14 of 306
Approval Criteria (Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) 25.215.020(8)(c))
1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,
welfare, and protection of the environment.
The application was required to prepare a non‐project Environmental Impact Statement due
to the potential for adverse environmental impacts associated with the proposal.
A Final Environmental Impact Statement was issued by the City of Pasco on July 29, 2024. A
summary of the FEIS is included in the staff report.
2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and
with the portion of the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment.
RCW 36.70A.110 states that each county shall designate an Urban Growth Area (UGA) of
sufficient densities, to the permit urban growth projected to occur in a twenty‐year period.
As part of this planning process, each city within the county must include areas sufficient to
accommodate the broad range of needs and uses that will accompany the projected urban
growth including, as appropriate, medical, governmental, institutional, commercial, service,
retail, and other nonresidential uses.
The subject property/amendment area (site), and land in the vicinity on the south side of E A
Street, has historically been reserved for industrial uses. The consideration of this site was
not deemed appropriate for the expansion of residential housing during the above noted
analysis.
3. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or
The proposed amendment does not correct a mapping error.
4. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed amendment does not correct an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive
Plan.
Additional factors for consideration include (PMC 25.215.020(9)):
A. The effect upon the physical environment.
The site is undeveloped and generally level. Vegetation is primarily volunteer grasses and
irrigated agricultural crop circles. Grading and clearing of vegetation will have to take place
at the site for future development.
Page 15 of 306
B. The effect on open space and natural features including, but not limited to, topography,
streams, rivers, and lakes.
The site does not contain any designated open space, is considered to have very low
liquefaction susceptibility, and contains no steep slopes, surface water, or wetlands. Any
development of this site, be it industrial, commercial, or residential, would have a similar
impact upon the natural features of the site.
C. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods.
The site sits in a historically Industrial land use and commercial and industrial zoning districts.
To the north, Mixed Residential and Commercial land uses (both developed and vacant) are
present. The planned development of the A Street Soccer Complex, located west of the site,
by the Pasco Parks and Recreation, was approved by the Pasco Hearing Examiner in
September 2020; presently several soccer fields, one with night‐time lighting, and an
associated parking lot have been constructed.
Within the immediate vicinity of the site are recently completed and planned industrial
facilities such as two Amazon fulfillment centers, and a Local Bounti greenhouse currently
under expansion. In total, more than 4,510,000 square feet of industrial facilities surround
the site. Best practices indicate that locating residential households within proximity to
industrial lands and users is detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare of residents.
Particularly, residents are likelier to be exposed to higher concentrations of odor, noise, air
pollution, and dust.
Staff does not consider the proposal to be compatible with adjacent land uses and may lead
to increase compatibility issues with nearby industrial users.
D. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities, including utilities, roads, public
transportation, parks, recreation, and schools.
The site currently has road access/frontage on E A Street. E A Street carries a classification of
Minor‐Arterial and provides connections to Heritage Boulevard, Oregon Avenue, and US
Highway 12.
E A Street is also a designated truck route per PMC 10.80.040, and a T‐3 truck corridor per
WSDOT 2023 Freight and Goods Transportation System classification, carrying between
300,000 to 4 million tons of freight per year.
Due to the significant size of the site, the development of a transportation network would be
required to assist with the circulation and movement of future residents. The results of the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) indicate that the preferred alternative would result in
approximately 1,314 PM peak hour trips, and the need to improvement 16 intersections to
maintain adopted Level of Service Standards.
Page 16 of 306
The proposed amendment would increase the amount of demand on utility services
compared to existing conditions on the site. The utility analysis in the EIS indicates that the
alternatives of the proposal when compared to a potential future industrial use may be
insignificant.
Due to the significant increase of households, the EIS identifies that site would host a future
elementary school and a range of parks and recreational spaces. If this proposal is approved
further transportation impact analysis may be required during future rezone application(s) or
building permit application(s) review.
E. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the
demand for such land.
The proposed site (approximately 197 acres) represents approximately 3% of all vacant lands
with an Industrial future land use classification in the Pasco Urban Growth Area, and 10% of
vacant lands with an Industrial future land use classification within the Pasco City Limits.
There is an increasing demand for housing to accommodate future growth projections. By
the year 2038, Pasco will have a population of nearly 122,000 residents, an increase of 42,000
residents from 2022 estimates. The increasing population growth will demand the
construction of more affordable and attainable housing types, including a diverse range of
units ranging from single‐family detached to townhomes, apartments, and multifamily
housing. Diverse housing options have been identified in both the preferred and medium
density alternatives of the EIS.
Due to the size and configuration of the site, it has the potential to accommodate a significant
number of future households and commercial services. The residential growth across the
Urban Growth Area (and Tri‐Cities metropolitan region) will also increase the need for
commercial and industrial lands. Policy LU‐2A of the Comprehensive Plan requires the City to
maintain sufficient land designated to accommodate residential, commercial, industrial,
educational, public facility, and open‐space uses proximate to appropriate transportation and
utility infrastructure.
The introduction of many residential households within proximity of active industrial
development may hinder future industrial development on available sites. Staff notes that it
will be difficult to replace the loss of industrial lands within the Urban Growth Area that offers
access to rail, highway, and complementary uses.
F. The current and projected project density in the area; and
The EIS indicates that the Preferred Alternative would result in a residential density of 8.7
dwelling units per acre, and 5.8 dwelling units per acre under the medium density alternative.
The current Industrial Land Use does not provide for a range of residential densities. The EIS
indicates that the site can accommodate (via the proposed alternatives) 1,028 – 1,354
housing units, or approximately 3,258 – 4,292 new residents.
Page 17 of 306
G. The effect, if any, upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
The 2018‐2038 Comprehensive Plan calls for the adoption of several regulations, standards
and strategies that implement transportation, housing, and parks and open space goals and
policies. To date, the city has initiated and moved forward on several housing related
initiatives.
State Law and the Pasco Municipal Code require that amendments to the Pasco
Comprehensive Plan be considered concurrently, meaning, rather than adopting changes on
a piecemeal basis, proposed amendments must be considered so the cumulative effect of the
various proposals can be ascertained. Excluding this proposal and Broadmoor Master Plan,
approximately 72 acres were proposed for Mixed Residential and Commercial designations
in the 2022 docket. The 2018‐2038 Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Area analysis has
identified, outside of the proposal site for this application, where the City of Pasco can
adequately accommodate projected housing growth. Therefore, the need to locate housing
within the immediate proximity of industrial uses is not necessary to meet the demands of
the growing population.
While the mitigation measures outlined in the FEIS address many potential impacts, there are
concerns about their long‐term effectiveness in fully resolving land use conflicts between
residential and industrial areas. The success of these measures will depend on proper
implementation, enforcement, and continuous monitoring. Given the unusual situation of
placing new housing near active industrial sites, additional caution and potentially stronger
mitigation strategies may be required to ensure public health and safety. The application
intents to further the city’s goals on increasing housing availability, however, it conflicts with
several goals and policies in the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
Public and Agency Comment
Comments on the proposal have been included in Exhibit B.
Summary of Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
The proposal resulted in a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Determination of Significance
in July 2022. A final EIS was issued on July 29, 2024. The FEIS evaluates a proposed amendment
to Pasco's Comprehensive Plan, changing 196.31± acres from Medium and Light Industrial to
Mixed Commercial‐Residential. Three alternatives are considered: the Preferred Alternative (8.7
housing units/acre), Medium Density Alternative (5.8 housing units/acre), and No Action
Alternative (remaining industrial).
Key issues include land use changes, increased traffic, potential loss of industrial employment,
and compatibility concerns between residential and industrial uses. The FEIS outlines impact on
earth, air quality, utilities, land use, population, housing, employment, public services, and
environmental health for each alternative.
Mitigation measures are proposed for various impact categories, including:
Page 18 of 306
Earth/Erosion: Implementing erosion control best practices and stormwater management
plans.
Air Quality: Dust control measures and encouraging non‐motorized transportation.
Water Resources: Low impact development techniques and protecting critical aquifer
recharge areas.
Fish/Wildlife: Preserving open space corridors and habitat enhancement.
Noise: Using landscaping, setbacks, and limiting construction hours.
Land Use: Implementing design standards and phased development.
Transportation: Improving road networks and developing multi‐modal options.
Public Services: Ensuring adequate infrastructure capacity before development.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommended in favor of application CPA2022‐003’s inclusion for
approval as part of the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket on January 25, 2023.
Page 19 of 306
Beverly L. Anderson
Patrick J. Cronin ID
Darren M. Digiacinto ID
Timothy R. Fischer ID
Scott A. Gingras ID MT
Michael T. Howard ID MT
Collette C. Leland ID
Christine M. Meegan ID
Benjamin H. Rascoff ID
Dalton J. Reynolds ID
Gabrielle C. Roth
Casey R. Simmons ID
Thor R. Tangvald ID
Elizabeth A. Tellessen ID
Kenneth A. Thompson
Courtney B. Whitten ID
Of Counsel
C. Matthew Andersen ID
Kevin J. Curtis
Carl E. Hueber
Nancy L. Isserlis
Fred C. Pflanz
Richard W. Relyea
Jeffrey R. Ropp
Lucinda S. Whaley
All lawyers admitted in WA. Lawyers admitted in ID and MT as indicated.
Courtney B. Whitten
cbw@winstoncashatt.com
September 6, 2024
City of Pasco City Council
525 N. Third Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
Re: Comment on CPA2022-003/SEPA 2022-038
New Heritage Land Use Amendment
Dear Councilmembers:
Our client, Pasco Road 40, LLC, is the Applicants of SEPA 2022‐076, a project directly to the
southeast of SEPA 2022-038’s subject site. Pasco Road 40 has concerns that CPA2022-003/SEPA
#2022-038 does not fully consider existing and proposed conditions, and requests Council reopen
CPA2022-003 or require a Supplemental EIS, so that the traffic impacts of the rezone can be
reevaluated considering the trips generated by Pasco Road 40’s project and impose specific traffic
mitigation conditions, rather than allowing those mitigations to be determined at the project level.
The stated purpose of an EIS is to provide information to the decision-makers regarding the
mitigation measures that would avoid or minimize the significant impacts of the proposal that have
been identified by the agency. WAC 197-11-400. To be adequate, an EIS must present
decisionmakers with a reasonably thorough discussion of the significant aspects of the probable
environmental consequences of the agency's decision. Kiewit Const. Grp. Inc. v. Clark Cnty., 83
Wn. App. 133, 140, 920 P.2d 1207 (1996).
Pasco Road 40’s Updated Traffic Impact Analysis was accepted by the City on July 1, 2022.
Heritage’s Draft EIS was issued on September 23, 2022. Accordingly, Heritage’s EIS, and its
proposed mitigation conditions, must consider the information in Pasco Road 40’s traffic study.
And, the final EIS must identify the impacts of the proposal, and the proposed mitigation
conditions must be specifically identified rather than imposed at the project level.
In reviewing the EIS for SEPA #2022-038, one area of concern for Pasco Road 40 is that the traffic
analysis fails to consider the traffic that will be generated by Pasco Road 40’s project and the effect
of pertinent projects included in the latest Traffic Improvement Plan.
Page 20 of 306
September 6, 2024
Page 2
Pasco Road 40’s project is estimated to generate 7,246 weekday daily trips, but these trips are also
unaccounted for in Heritage’s traffic analysis. See, Appendix 3 to New Heritage Amendment to
the City’s Comprehensive Plan. This oversight was brought forward in a comment dated
November 14, 2022, by the City of Pasco Director of Community and Economic Development,
Rick White, who also directed that Heritage’s traffic analysis should include intersections to the
southeast: Road 40 E & Sacajawea Park Road and US-12 & Sacajawea Park Road/Tank Farm
Road. Heritage’s traffic study was not updated to include this additional traffic or these
intersections. But, in order to have a full and complete understanding of this rezone’s impact on
the environment, both of these factors need to be addressed.
Without this information included in Heritage’s traffic analysis, the proposal’s impact cannot be
adequately determined and thereby adequately mitigated. Nor can the proposal’s impact on
community facilities, including roads, be established, as required for the City Council to approve
a Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
Moreover, Heritage’s EIS does not identify the mitigation required for its impact on transportation,
specifically roadways and traffic. It directs that mitigation measures be identified at the project
level. See, EIS, pg. 74. However, for a “nonproject action, such as a comprehensive plan
amendment or rezone, the agency must address the probable impacts of any future project action
the proposal would allow.” Spokane Cnty. v. E. Washington Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd., 176 Wn.
App. 555, 579, 309 P.3d 673 (Div. III 2013) (emphasis added). A directive to further study the
proposal’s impact on traffic at the project level is insufficient to meet this mandate under SEPA.
Pasco Road 40 respectfully requests that the City Council require additional study regarding the
impacts of Heritage’s proposal on the traffic system, and that its EIS propose specific mitigation
conditions that would mitigate those impacts, as mandated by SEPA.
Very truly yours,
COURTNEY B. WHITTEN
ELIZABETH A. TELLESSEN
cc: Tarragon L.L.C.
Page 21 of 306
September 6, 2024
Honorable City Council
City of Pasco
525 N 3rd Ave
Pasco, WA 99301
Subject: CPA 2022-003 – New Heritage Land Use Designation Change
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed change of land use designation from
industrial to mixed residential and commercial for the above referenced property. The Port of
Pasco is officially neutral on the proposal and would like to offer the following comments for
Council consideration as you carefully deliberate on the future use of these lands.
Housing availability and affordability is a critical need in Pasco to support our growth
and the new industrial jobs being added to our community. This project could help
meet that demand. The need for affordable housing, however, is balanced by other
characteristics of this property.
The property has been designated and zoned industrial for decades, predating even the
residential rezoning of Tierra Vida and the other residential zones on the north side of
“A” Street.
Significant investment has gone into preparing the site for industrial development
including:
o Widening “A” Street and providing truck-ready pavement on “A” Street and Road
40 East
o Adding industrially sized water and sewer along “A” Street and to the south of
the property
o Adding an industrial railspur funded through state funds adjacent to the
southern edge of the property.
o Adding Heritage Blvd as a direct connection to Highway 12 from the former
“Heritage Industrial Park”
o Rezoning the frontage of this property along “A” Street as commercial (from
industrial) to act as a buffer to the residential use on the north side of “A” Street
The surrounding property has seen sizeable industrial development in the past few
years including construction of the Amazon projects, Local Bounti (who just announced
plans to expand their greenhouse), and plans for the Tarragon warehouse development.
Page 22 of 306
CPA 2022-003
September 6, 2024
Page 2 of 2
In our opinion, there would very likely be other industrial users that would locate at the
property if it remains designated for industrial use.
Industrial investment provides property tax, sales tax, and utility taxes that help support
City services and schools
The Port welcomed early outreach by the developer to gather our thoughts on the
proposal. Although we believe industrial use is the preferred approach, we did
understand the need for housing. We offered input that if the property ultimately is
reclassified for residential use, there should be pockets of light industrial similar to
Commercial Ave or Foster Wells Business Park that further cements the work/live
proximity. We do not see that those light industrial pockets have been included in the
plan.
We are also concerned that the change to residential would be creating and
perpetuating environmental justice conflicts of certain neighborhoods being more
impacted by the impacts of surrounding industrial use. If the rationale is to more
equitably distribute those impacts to the larger community, then this land use change is
doing the opposite. If this land is reclassified for residential, a covenant or easement on
the property recognizing the impacts of surrounding industrial uses could be useful to
prevent future conflict. This could be included in the Concomitant Agreement proposed
by the applicant.
Available and useable industrial land is a very limited quantity within the City’s UGA. It
is a very long and costly process to increase that inventory, secure needed UGA
expansions, and extend industrially sized utilities to more remote locations outside the
City.
We conclude our comments by recognizing the outstanding contributions of the project
applicant, Broetje Orchards LLC, for bringing quality, community-based affordable housing to
the Pasco area. We know of no other developer that would be better suited to add additional
affordable housing in Pasco. This site could help address that need, however there may be
other locations within the City that would be more suitable.
Respectfully,
PORT OF PASCO
Randy Hayden, P.E.
Executive Director
Page 23 of 306
You don't often get email from jhjalt@live.com. Learn why this is important
From:Kristin Webb
To:Jacob Gonzalez; Rick White; Carmen Patrick
Subject:FW: CPA2022-003
Date:Thursday, June 9, 2022 8:20:05 AM
From: John Hjaltalin <jhjalt@live.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2022 8:14 AM
To: Kristin Webb <webbk@pasco-wa.gov>
Cc: Polly Frisby <kandcfrisby@gmail.com>; Craig and Karen Walton <candkwalton@charter.net>
Subject: CPA2022-003
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Pasco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or
open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.]
ROJO Venture, LLC owns the parcels listed below.
112530057
112530050
112530051
We are commenting against the proposal CPA2022-003 for the re-zoning of the of the subject
area from Industrial to Mixed Residential and Commercial. This proposal will share a boundry
with our property and will promote activity and development that will be in conflict with the
long-term established activity and uses on our property. The proposal will also restrict future
use and development activities that would be protected and/or compatible with the current
zoning and the current activities on our parcels. The proposal will also prevent development
opportunities that may not be in conflict with the zoning of our property, but a change in the
neighborhood atmosphere will hinder the attraction to our adjacent parcels and their
permitted activities by potential clients.
We would also like to point out that the photographic map included with the notice is not
accurate and could be misleading because it does not accurately reflect current development
on other adjacent properties particularly the large Amazon projects directly adjacent to the
East boundry of CPA2022-003. These projects to be completed this summer will have
significant industrial traffic that will also impact the North boundry of CPA2022-003 and the
South boundry is already confined by an industrial rail spur. The West boundry is near the
main truck access route to the Pasco Port area. It is inconsistent to force a residential area into
this environment.
John Hjaltalin
Member
Page 24 of 306
ROJO Venture, LLC
Page 25 of 306
Page 26 of 306
Page 27 of 306
Page 28 of 306
Page 29 of 306
Page 30 of 306
Page 31 of 306
Page 32 of 306
Page 33 of 306
Page 34 of 306
Page 35 of 306
Page 36 of 306
Page 37 of 306
Page 38 of 306
Page 39 of 306
Page 40 of 306
Page 41 of 306
Page 42 of 306
Page 43 of 306
Page 44 of 306
Page 45 of 306
Page 46 of 306
Page 47 of 306
Page 48 of 306
Page 49 of 306
Page 50 of 306
Page 51 of 306
Page 52 of 306
Page 53 of 306
Page 54 of 306
Page 55 of 306
Page 56 of 306
Page 57 of 306
Page 58 of 306
Page 59 of 306
Page 60 of 306
Page 61 of 306
Page 62 of 306
Page 63 of 306
Page 64 of 306
Page 65 of 306
Page 66 of 306
Page 67 of 306
Page 68 of 306
Page 69 of 306
Page 70 of 306
Page 71 of 306
Page 72 of 306
Page 73 of 306
Page 74 of 306
Page 75 of 306
Page 76 of 306
Page 77 of 306
Page 78 of 306
Page 79 of 306
Page 80 of 306
2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket
CPA2023-001
File Number: CPA2023-001
Applicant: Shane O’Neill with Clover Planning and Zoning LLC
Description: Future Land Use Map Amendment: Low Density Residential to Medium Density
Residential
Current Zoning: RS-20
Address / Parcel(s) 118292027, 118292036
Total Area (Acres) 2.85
Environmental Determination Determination of Non-Significance, Issued 06/19/2023
Page 81 of 306
Approval Criteria:
Per Pasco Municipal Code 25.215.020(8)(c), The City may approve Comprehensive Plan
amendments if it finds that:
(I) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,
welfare, and protection of the environment.
(ii) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A
RCW and with the portion of the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the
amendment.
(iii) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or
(iv) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive
Plan.
In addition, per Pasco Municipal Code 25.215.020(9) The City must also consider the following.
factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments:
(a) The effect upon the physical environment.
(b) The effect on open space and natural features including, but not limited to,
topography, streams, rivers, and lakes.
(c) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding
neighborhoods.
(d) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities, including utilities, roads, public
transportation, parks, recreation, and schools.
(e) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density
and the demand for such land.
(f) The current and projected project density in the area; and
(g) The effect, if any, upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
Analysis
1. Does the proposed amendment bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,
welfare, and protection of the environment?
Per Pasco Municipal Code 25.215.015 Comprehensive Plan land use density table, the current
Low Density Residential designation accommodates a variety of residential housing at a
density of 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre, and allows for R-S-20, R-S-12, R-S-1, R-1, R-1-A, and
R-1-A2 zoning.
The proposed Medium Density Residential Land Use Designation accommodates a diverse range
of housing options at general density range between 6 – 20 dwelling units per acre. The
transition from the surrounding low-density residential to medium density residential land uses
is in place in many areas of the city, and does not interfere with the public health, safety,
welfare, or protection of the environment.
Page 82 of 306
2. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the requirements of the Washington State
Growth Management Act and to the affected portion(s) of the adopted Pasco
Comprehensive Plan?
The proposed land use amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density
Residential demonstrates consistency with several key goals of the Washington State Growth
Management Act (GMA). The site is located within Pasco's Urban Growth Area, with existing or
planned adequate public facilities and services, including a nearby fire station and adjacent
arterial roads with municipal utilities, aligning with the Urban Growth goal (RCW
36.70A.020(1)).
The change to Medium Density Residential supports the Reduce Sprawl goal (RCW
36.70A.020(2)) by allowing for more efficient use of urban land. The site's location at the
intersection of two arterial roads provides good transportation access, and increased density
could support more efficient use of existing infrastructure, addressing the Transportation goal
(RCW 36.70A.020(3)). The amendment also supports the Housing goal (RCW 36.70A.020(4)) by
allowing for a greater variety of housing types and densities within the existing urban area.
While not directly promoting commercial development, the increased residential density can
support local businesses and economic activity, contributing to the Economic Development goal
(RCW 36.70A.020(5)).
The site has access to existing public facilities and services, with any development subject to
review to ensure adequate service levels are maintained, addressing the Public Facilities and
Services goal (RCW 36.70A.020(12)). Lastly, the amendment process includes public notice and
opportunity for comment, consistent with the Citizen Participation goal (RCW 36.70A.020(11))
of the GMA.
3. Does the proposed amendment correct a mapping error?
The proposed amendment does not correct a mapping error.
4. Does the proposed amendment address a deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan?
The proposed land use amendment does not address a deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposal aligns with several Comprehensive Plan goals and policies:
• Land Use Goal LU-2: Promotes variety of compatible land uses within the Urban Growth
Area.
• Land Use Policy LU-2-A: The site has adequate transportation and utility infrastructure to
support diverse land uses.
• Land Use Policy LU-4-C: Encourages walkable, mixed-use developments. The amendment
would allow for commercial and residential uses, potentially improving walkability with
appropriate infrastructure.
Page 83 of 306
• Land Use Policy LU-5-A: Supports varied residential densities in the Urban Growth Area. The
proposal allows for higher-density residential and commercial uses.
5. What are the effects on the physical environment, including open space and natural
features?
This is a non-projection proposal. Transitioning the site to a Medium Density Residential
land use designation will not affect any known protected lands such as critical or natural.
areas.
Adequate measures within the Pasco Municipal Code exist to mitigate any adverse impacts.
impacts to the natural environment of the proposal, including conformance with, or
mitigation of identified Critical Area Habitat.
6. What is the compatibility and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods?
The site is currently designated Low Density Residential (3-6 dwelling units per acre). The
proposed Medium Density Residential designation would allow 6-20 dwelling units per acre,
offering a wider range of housing options, however the overall development could be limited
given the constraints of the lot size, and location at Road 100 and Argent.
This transition from low to medium density is consistent with patterns seen elsewhere in the
city. The site's proximity to a major planned commercial corridor (Road 100, Chapel Hill Drive,
Broadmoor Blvd) supports a balance of housing options near business activities.
As a non-project amendment, specific environmental or developmental impacts would be
addressed during future project-level reviews, should the designation change be approved.
7. What are the impacts on public facilities, and utilities, transportation system, parks,
recreation, and public schools?
• Public facilities and utilities – The site are nearby and would be served by municipal water
and sewer.
• Transportation system – Land Use Policy LU-4-B requires the city to encourage infill and
higher density uses within proximity to major travel corridors and public transportation.
service areas. The site is located at the corner of two arterial streets. If developed as
proposed, full frontage improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk would be.
required; the intersection may require upgrades up to and including signalization.
• Parks, recreation – no substantial impacts on parks or recreation are anticipated due to
the proposal.
• Public schools – no substantial impacts on schools are anticipated due to the proposal.
8. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density
and the demand for such land.
Page 84 of 306
The Medium Density Land Use accounts for 15% of all residential land uses, and less than 1% of
all land uses within the Urban Growth Area in the current Comprehensive Plan. The
Comprehensive Plan noted that an increase of housing options is necessary to ac commodate
anticipated growth projections.
9. The current and projected project density in the area.
The site is in an area with a diverse range of development activity occurring. Nearby
developments have been approved, in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Pasco
Zoning Code that have increased overall density in the area.
10. The effect, if any, upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed non-project land use amendment is generally in compliance with the Goals and
Policies of the Pasco Comprehensive Plan.
Public and Agency Comments
Comments on the proposal have been included in Exhibit B.
Planning Commission Recommendation and Modified Proposal
The Planning Commission recommended a denial of the proposed amendment on May 16,
2024. On August 15, 2024, the applicant submitted a modified proposal, revising the
amendment request to Medium Density Residential, instead of the previously requested Mixed
Residential/Commercial designation.
Page 85 of 306
Page 86 of 306
Page 87 of 306
Page 1 of 11
Public Comment Received
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2023-001
Email #1
From: Dallas Green <dallas@dallasgreenteam.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 8:59 PM
Subject: Comment CPA2023-001
Regarding the zoning change request for CPA2023-001 which will be before the commission on 10/19/23:
I am in strong support of an individual's land rights and in most cases their ability to develop and modify
their use as a city grows and evolves. The issue the planning commission must consider is not specific just
to these parcels, the City of Pasco fails the residents on daily basis as a result of the lack of traffic
infrastructure to support the growth. This failure rests at the feet of the city’s planning commission,
planning department, and council.
The intersection of Road 100 and Argent is heavily traveled not just from homes built prior to 2008 but
right after with Chiawana High School other housing developments, it has become quite a mess. The
addition of a right turn lane on Argent west bound to north bound Road 100 has helped but the number
of cars that turn left heading south on Road 100 is not insignificant. Those vehicles are forced to dart
between oncoming traffic in both directions. The Road 100 traffic heading southbound turning east on to
Argent, towards Chiawana High School, backs up southbound Road 100 daily, congesting traffic in all
directions.
With the River Shore development recently approved by the planning commission (a horrendous mistake)
we will see a greater number of vehicles utilizing West Court and the west side of Argent, all converging
on that intersection.
Most people would consider it insane to approve yet another rezone prior to the traffic infrastructure
already considered, planned, and in process but that is just what the City of Pasco does. Build and build
and the traffic nightmares continue.
Planning commission members, this is your chance to start addressing Pasco's failed traffic planning
history. You on the planning commission are wielding the rezone approval pen wildly to support high
density housing and it seems quite clear you are not considering the traffic disruptions as well as the
destruction of single family neighborhoods the overwhelming majority of Pasco residents moved here to
enjoy.
Regards,
Dallas Green, CRS, SRES
Managing Broker
Dallas Green Team - eXp Realty
T: 509-378-1848
E: Dallas@DallasGreenTeam.com
Page 88 of 306
Page 2 of 11
Email #2
From: June Detloff <june.detloff@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 9:07 PM
Subject: CPA2023-001 Rezone
Please do not allow any further commercial zoning in the south end of Road 100.
Thank you.
June Detloff
2615 Road 96
509-547-6544
Email #3
From: Roger Wright <roger@rgwenterprises.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 9:01:41 AM
Cc: brenda.wright@charter.net <brenda.wright@charter.net>
Subject: File No CPA2023-001
We are the owners of 10217 Willow Way, PID 118-212-130. We have reviewed the application for Comp
Plan change File No. CPA2023-001, 3015 Road 100 & 9904 W. Argent. This application proposes to change
the land use for this 2.86 acre site from Low Density Residential to Mixed Residential and Commercial.
We are very opposed to this action. This would completely change the nature of the existing neighborhood
impacting the property values for the existing residential homes, will further impact traffic at this location
which already is nearly impossible to access Road 100 due to business and school traffic, and we already
have a commercial area a short distance north on Road 100. Installing commercial development here will
only further draw criminal activity into the residential neighborhoods, an activity already occurring
adjacent to the commercial area on Road 100 at the freeway.
We request the Planning Commission deny this application and keep the land use at this location Low
Density Residential.
Roger and Brenda Wright
10217 Willow Way
Pasco, WA 99301
Email #4
From: petyr_.Jk@charter.net <petyr.Jk@charter.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 11:32 AM
To: Jacob Gonzalez <gonzalezjb@pasco-wa.gov>
Subject: Reject Commercial Rezoning of Rd. 100 and Argent Intersection
To: Jacob B. Gonzalez, Planning Commission Director
Page 89 of 306
Page 3 of 11
Rebuttal to the application by Shane O'Neill, Clover Planning &Zoning LLC for rezoning of land on the SE
corner of Road 100 and Argent from RS-20 to Mixed Residential-Commercial with eventual rezone to C-1.
The planning Commission should reject this amendment based on Pasco Municipal Code (25.215.020
Comprehensive Plan amendment) 8(c)(i) Which reads “The proposed amendment bears a substantial
relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment;” I believe the
amendment will have a substantial NEGATIVE impact on the health, safety, welfare and environment of
our neighborhood and I outline some of those criteria below. It is clear that the applicants want
commercial development that most the nearby residents do not believe is in their best interests and will
significantly degrade our neighborhood.
The application is redundant and inconsistent as noted below. First, the land designation is inconsistent,
and the acreage is contradictorily listed as 1.9, 2.86 and 3 acres throughout the document. The application
lists Road 100 as a principal arterial and Argent as a minor arterial. The comprehensive plan map (City-of-
Pasco-2018-2038-Map-Folio-Updated (pasco-wa.gov)) list these as a minor arterial and a collector
respectively.
The applicant suggests that this parcel will be an ideal location for a “walkable, neighborhood friendly”
commercial zone. The applicants do not understand the importance of this corner in traffic flow for
residents to I-182 for employment and shopping. Commercial development of this intersection will impede
the last remaining free-flowing exit point for local residents. It will significantly obstruct residents from
accessing nearby commercial resources and commuting to work.
The applicant frequently mentions the need for “walkable” commercial development. To achieve such a
goal will involve a long-term plan to reimagine this intersection. Currently the intersection, as well as Road
100 and Argent are not safe for pedestrian, cyclist, or moped traffic. This development is likely to
exacerbate the problem and make the neighborhood less “walkable.” The application does not provide
any plan to make this area meet walkable criteria other than to make use of popular buzzwords.
The application will most probably result in the construction of a poorly planned strip mall with attendant
traffic problems, 24/7 noise and light pollution, increased crime, and unsafe pedestrian access. The
applicants suggest this intersection should “mirror” that of Road 68 and Argent. We do not need another
such traffic and commercial nightmare at Road 100 and Argent.
As a resident of Riverview area for 35 years and of Pasco proper since annexation, I have seen considerable
changes to the area. This application represents the worst type of planning. I strongly suggest the planning
commission reject the motion for recommendation and not forward the report to the City Council.
Rejecting this application will show that Pasco encourages intelligent integration of residential
neighborhoods with commercial opportunities. This application is a sad example of how developers game
the system by buying up property, allowing the residential property to decay, then describing the site as
“underutilized” (I quote from the application) and eventually converting the real estate to commercial
property.
Peter C. Rieke, Ph.D.
9104 W. Pooler St. Pasco, WA 99301
509-438-6126
Petyr_jk@charter.netPeter C. Rieke, Ph.D.
9104 W. Pooler St. Pasco, WA 99301
509-438-6126
Petyr jk@charter.net
Page 90 of 306
Page 4 of 11
Email #5
From: Jody Kronvall <jkronvall@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 7:41:55 PM
Subject: File No CPA2023-001
We have been Pasco residents at 10204 W. Argent for the past 36 years. We have just been notified of the
Comp Plan change File No. CPA2023-001.
We are unable to come to the meeting on October 19th, but wanted to voice our objection to this
proposal. Growth in this area has been dramatic, but we have been accepting of the changes. To allow this
area to go from Low Density to Mixed Residential and Commercial is asking for trouble. There is already a
high volume of traffic due to the school and business, why compound this with a small parcel? Yes there
is a church on this corner, but that is only impacted on Sunday primarily. When you survey this area, one
only sees houses, let's keep it this way.
Charlie and Jody Kronvall
10204 W. Argent Road
Pasco, WA 99301
Email #6
From: Patricia Campbell patocean@hotmail.com
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 11:08 AM
Subject: File Number CPA2023-001
Sirs,
We have recently received a Notice of Public Hearing regarding the potential rezone of a 2.86 parcel of
property located at 3015 Road 100 and 9904 W Argent. Provided File Number CPA 2023-001
documentation listed in the Notice refers to a request to rezone this property from Low Density Residential
to a Mixed Residential and Commercial zoning. The term Mixed Residential and Commercial appears to
allow the owner/developer of this property potential free reign to develop whatever they prefer. There is
abundant property in this area along Road 100 north of the Franklin County Irrigation District canal
available for commercial development. We have been residents of this neighborhood for 32 years, and it
has always been a desirable, well maintained area to live.
Property values (and associated property tax revenues) have remained high because of this, and are
potentially at risk dependent upon the type of future developments. We would prefer that the zoning of
Low Density Residential remain in place for this property, allowing the integrity of this neighborhood to
remain in place, and urge you to consider our concerns in your decision making process.
Thank You,
Duncan and Patricia Campbell
10208 W Willow Way
Pasco, Wa 99301
Page 91 of 306
Page 5 of 11
Email #7
From: Carolyn Henry <chenry509@charter.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 11:22 AM
Subject: Re-zoning File No CPA2023-001
Planning Commission:
We are the owners of 3109 Road 103, parcel number 118202598. We have reviewed the application for
Comp Plan change File No. CPA2023-001, 3015 Road 100 & 9904 W. Argent. This application proposes to
change the land use for this 2.86 acre site from Low Density Residential to Mixed Residential and
Commercial.
We are very opposed to this action. This would completely change the nature of the existing neighborhood
impacting the property values for the existing residential homes, will further impact traffic at this location
which already is nearly impossible to access Road 100 due to business and school traffic, and we already
have a commercial area a short distance north on Road 100. Installing commercial development here will
only further draw criminal activity into the residential neighborhoods, an activity already occurring
adjacent to the commercial area on Road 100 at the freeway.
We request the Planning Commission deny this application and keep the land use at this location Low
Density Residential.
Thank you,
William and Carolyn Henry
3109 Road 103
Pasco, WA 99301
Email #8
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 11:34 AM
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Contact the City Clerk
Name: mark a mansell
Email: MAMANSELL@GMAIL.COM
Subject: Comments Against Future Land Use Map Amendment for Parcel(s) 118292036 & 118292027
Requesting a change from Low Density Residential to Mixed Residential and Commercial
Comment: My wife and I are against the future land use map amendment for Parcel(s) 118292036 &
118292027, changing from Low Density Residential to Mixed Residential and Commercial.
We moved into the area because, in part, this is a residential area and NOT a business/commercial area.
The almost three acres rezoning will provide room for numerous businesses. There is no business plan
submitted, so let go with the worst case, a multi-business area with high thruput businesses and lots of
traffic placed at one of the busiest intersections in the area. This would be a traffic disaster.
Page 92 of 306
Page 6 of 11
Throughout the Tri -Cities, one can see beggars at the entrances to many business areas. They also beg
from shoppers as they w[a]nder around the area. There are often homeless people in the area. We do not
want these in our area; we do not want the crime that comes with this; we do not want the reduced safety
that comes with this.
There are hundreds of dwellings to the north and south of this intersection and unimproved lands that will
increase that number significantly as they are developed. This intersection is the collection point for all of
these subdivisions. While it is a great for business owners, It is the worst possible place to locate businesses
for the local residents and traffic.
There are no business needs in this area that are not met by local business areas already in place in the
local community within a five-minute drive.
Regards,
Mark and Donna Mansell
Email #9
From: CV Smith <vanfan2@msn.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2023 4:37 PM
To: Andrew Hattori <hattoria@pasco-wa.gov>
Subject: Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Code and Application
Dear Mr. Hattori,
Thank you for your message, and I appreciated the call from Jacob Gonzales, also. Please formally consider
these remarks as part of the public process.
To confirm, I respectfully request:
1. This application should be reviewed as part of the planned upcoming periodic review for several
reasons, including
a. This process has been ruined by the proposer’s representative's angry threats to public
commenters that we can resolve it with a fight in the parking lot;
b. The amendment is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s designation for Road 100 adopted
only two years ago to prohibit ‘mixed-use residential and commercial’ in this area. Pasco should be
implementing the Plan rather than considering upending it;
c. The amendment would have irreversible and significant direct, indirect, and cumulative effects;
d. An amendment with this much effect should be part of the periodic review process that has broad
notice and public input;
e. The amendment removes the potential opportunity for other types of residential uses (e.g.
medium density residential) which would be more consistent with the surrounding low density residential
designation.
Page 93 of 306
Page 7 of 11
2. If Pasco wishes to continue now with the application, a new, effective notice is required to be sent
to the neighborhood and others. The current Pasco rule for notice is not consistent with the requirement
for “effective” notice. RCW 36.70A.035 required notice procedures reasonably calculated to provide notice
to property owners and other affected and interested individuals, government agencies, groups, and
businesses. Examples of reasonable notice provision include posting on the property.
a. Given the scope and impact of the proposed change, the 300 ft. boundary selected for notice (or
slightly larger?) is much too small, not appropriate.
b. The property has no posting.
c. The Save Our Shorelines group was not notified even though the proposed change is near areas
known to be used as a landing areas for migratory birds (the near-by designated open space, large open
church grass area, and agricultural field). This group has worked with cities and the community for years
and should have been notified.
d. It’s unclear whether Franklin County was notified.
e. Competing businesses less than a mile away were not notified.
3. If Pasco wishes to continue now with the application, after appropriate notice is provided, the City
and Applicant should provide a workshop to provide information on the amendment process and why it
would be appropriate to amend this important land use element only two years after the plan was
adopted, and outside of the periodic review process that begins soon. I believe the applicant owned these
properties prior to the Plan development and should have (or maybe did?) raise this issue during that
process. The applicant should be working with the neighborhood to find a mutually acceptable solution.
4. Pasco should revise its rules about Plan amendments which seem to remove Pasco’s discretion
and require a Supplemental SEPA analysis before rejecting a proposal. While a court would probably read
in discretion, the rules as written could cause confusion.
5. Pasco's amendment process, that has been described by commissioners as being phased (based
on the planning commission then the Council first determining whether the application is complete), does
not match the broad findings formally made by the planning department (the amendment would be
consistent with the Plan and the GMA).
6. Pasco's attorney should be participating.
Thank you for considering these comments.
Connie Smith
Email #10
From: kjajs@charter.net
To: Jeff Adams
Subject: File #CPA-2023-001 - Road 100 & Argent
Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 12:09:35 PM
Page 94 of 306
Page 8 of 11
To: Jeff Adams, Associate Planner, and the Planning Commission:
We are the owners of the property at 10204 Willow Way. We are strongly opposed to the proposed change
of the land use for the property listed in the application at 3015 Road 100 & 9904 W. Argent. This change
from Low Density Residential to Mixed Residential and Commercial would strongly impact the residents in
this surrounding area.
The change to this area would be devastating to the residents and neighborhood safety especially with no
specific project designated. This change of this land use designation would open the possibility of unknown
projects and other uses. This area does not need more traffic as we have seen a substantial increase of
traffic with the new developments and building in the surrounding area. With the new developments
being built all around our area, the commercial and multi-unit projects should suffice the area’s needs.
We need to consider the safety of our young children, our future children, and of the residents in this area.
This area has been designated Low Density Residential area for many years and should continue to remain
that way.
We hope that you will take into consideration with great respect to all current and future residents living
in the area the seriousness and impact a land use change would have on this community.
Respectfully submitted,
Kay & Albert Slahtasky
10204 Willow Way.
Email #11
From: Petyr Private <petyr.rieke@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 9:56 PM
To: Jacob Gonzalez <gonzalezjb@pasco-wa.gov>; David Milne <MilneCouncil@pasco-wa.gov>; Teresa
Kruschke <tmkruschke@gmail.com>; dallas@dallasgreenteam.com
Subject: Land use amendment at Rd 100 and Argent
Jacob please see the attached document and enter it into the public comments. On a side note, I am
appalled at the lack of notice given for this public hearing. I received notification on Tuesday and have had
precious little time to get the word out. I will be checking to see if any notification rules have been ignored.
This is simply not the way to run such an important commission given that the city knows there is
considerable public interest.
Thank you for your time and I always enjoy working with you.
Pete Rieke
9104 W Pooler Rd, Pasco, WA 99301
To : Jacob B. Gonzalez, Planning Commission Director
Rebuttal to the application by Shane O'Neill, Clover Planning &Zoning LLC for rezoning of land on the SE
corner of Road 100 and Argent from RS-20 to Mixed Residential-Commercial with eventual rezone to C-1.
Page 95 of 306
Page 9 of 11
The planning Commission should reject this amendment based on Pasco Municipal Code (25.215.020
Comprehensive Plan amendment) 8(c)(i) Which reads “The proposed amendment bears a substantial
relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment;” I believe the
amendment will have a substantial NEGATIVE impact on the health, safety, welfare and environment of
our neighborhood and I outline some of those criteria below. It is clear that the applicants want
commercial development that most the nearby residents do not believe is in their best interests and will
significantly degrade our neighborhood.
The application is redundant and inconsistent as noted below. First, the land designation is inconsistent,
and the acreage is contradictorily listed as 1.9, 2.86 and 3 acres throughout the document. The application
lists Road 100 as a principal arterial and Argent as a minor arterial. The comprehensive plan map (City-of-
Pasco-2018-2038-Map-Folio-Updated (pasco-wa.gov)) list these as a minor arterial and a collector
respectively.
The applicant suggests that this parcel will be an ideal location for a “walkable, neighborhood friendly”
commercial zone. The applicants do not understand the importance of this corner in traffic flow for
residents to I-182 for employment and shopping. Commercial development of this intersection will impede
the last remaining free-flowing exit point for local residents. It will significantly obstruct residents from
accessing nearby commercial resources and commuting to work.
The applicant frequently mentions the need for “walkable” commercial development. To achieve such a
goal will involve a long-term plan to reimagine this intersection. Currently the intersection, as well as Road
100 and Argent are not safe for pedestrian, cyclist, or moped traffic. This development is likely to
exacerbate the problem and make the neighborhood less “walkable.” The application does not provide
any plan to make this area meet walkable criteria other than to make use of popular buzzwords.
The application will most probably result in the construction of a poorly planned strip mall with attendant
traffic problems, 24/7 noise and light pollution, increased crime, and unsafe pedestrian access. The
applicants suggest this intersection should “mirror” that of Road 68 and Argent. We do not need another
such traffic and commercial nightmare at Road 100 and Argent.
As a resident of Riverview area for 35 years and of Pasco proper since annexation, I have seen considerable
changes to the area. This application represents the worst type of planning. I strongly suggest the planning
commission reject the motion for recommendation and not forward the report to the City Council.
Rejecting this application will show that Pasco encourages intelligent integration of residential
neighborhoods with commercial opportunities. This application is a sad example of how developers game
the system by buying up property, allowing the residential property to decay, then describing the site as
“underutilized” (I quote from the application) and eventually converting the real estate to commercial
property.
Peter C. Rieke, Ph.D.
9104 W. Pooler St. Pasco, WA 99301
509-438-6126
Petyr_jk@charter.net
Road 100/Argent is a significant arterial for exiting the Riverview area. Commercial development will
significantly block residents from accessing community resources.
Page 96 of 306
Page 10 of 11
To suggest that this will encourage walkability is almost ludicrous both Rd 100 and Argent are dangerous
places to for pedestrians and cyclists.
We do not need another strip mall in the midst of a low-density residential area. To suggest that this corner
should mirror that of Road 68 and Argent is baffling.
Q3 – support council goals multi-modal transportation network and retail taxes
Q6 - walking distance to residents of the immediate vicinity; thereby promoting a healthy lifestyle for Pasco
residents by encouraging walking. Reducing travel distances between customers and services enhances
public safety. Road 100 and Argent Street are extremely unfriendly to walking and cycling
Retail for the sake of retail is not in the general welfare.
Q6 – commercial land is available 1 mile north negating the need for this commercial development.
68 and Argent is a traffic mess for much of the day and best avoided if at all possible. We should not
“mirror” this fiasco at Road 100 and Argent
Q7 – incompatibility. Commercial development will result in noise and light pollution, increases and mixed
traffic flow that will negatively impact local residents.
Goals
LU-2: PLAN FOR A VARIETY OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WITHIN THE UGA
Nearby commercial development already address the need for compatible land uses. This application
creates an incompatible use resulting a radical change of the nature of the neighborhood.
LU-6: ENCOURAGE DISTINCTIVE QUALITY COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS THAT SUPPORT THE CITY’S OVERALL DEVELOPMENT GOALS
Road 100 is a minor arterial and Argent is a collector. Not principal or minor arterials respectively. It does
not mirror Road 68/Argent in any manner. This is a residential neighborhood that feed to commercial areas
to the north.
LU-6-B Policy: Promote efficient and functional neighborhood level and major commercial centers to meet
community demand.
The neighborhood has retail and commercial areas to the north that most residents pass through on a
daily basis to reach the Broadmoor/I-82 interchange. There is little need for more retail in this vicinity and
the idea that this promotes “walkable” neighborhood is almost ludicrous. It will make pedestrian access
more dangerous.
ED—1. GOAL: MAINTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AS AN IMPORTANT AND ONGOING CITY INITIATIVE
Rejecting this application will show that Pasco encourages intelligent integration of residential
neighborhoods with commercial opportunity. This application is a sad example of how developers game
the system by buying up property, allowing the homes to decay, and eventually converting the real estate
to commercial property.
ED-1-F Policy: Support and encourage residential/commercial mixed-use developments that provide
neighborhood shopping and services and promote walkable neighborhoods.
Page 97 of 306
Page 11 of 11
This development will create greater traffic hazards, promote more 24 hr. noise and traffic, and make this
intersection less pedestrian friendly.
ED-2-B Policy: Encourage development of a wide range of commercial and industrial uses strategically
located near major transportation corridors or facilities and in close proximity to existing or proposed
utility infrastructure while supporting local and regional needs.
Most residents use this intersection to access larger shopping areas and commute to work. The
intersection’s primary purpose is a feeder to areas north. There is not a lack of nearby retail services, and
this plan is unlikely to create services withing walking distance, and will make this intersection more
hazardous to pedestrians.
ED-2—E Policy: Periodically assess the adequacy of the supply of vacant and re-developable lands in the
City limits and the UGA, especially commercial and industrially zoned land.
Meeting the goals of some percentage of commercial land designation is not a valid reason for changing
zoning. The area is “underutilized” because the owners purchased the property, allowed the residential
value to decay, and now deem it somehow appropriate for commercial development.
Page 98 of 306
From:CityClerk
To:Carmen Patrick
Subject:FW: Pasco Public Hearing 9/9/24 Hearing on File #CPA2023-001
Date:Thursday, September 5, 2024 1:01:10 PM
Importance:High
Please include this in the AR for Monday’s Public Hearing.
Kindly,
Debby
From: kjajs@charter.net <kjajs@charter.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2024 2:04 PM
To: CityClerk <cityclerk@pasco-wa.gov>
Subject: Pasco Public Hearing 9/9/24 Hearing on File #CPA2023-001
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Pasco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or
open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.]
City Clerk and City Council Members:
We are responding to the Proposed Land use amendment on parcels 3015 Road 100
& 9904 West Argent Road/118292036 & 118292027.
We are opposed to the land use change for the same reasons as stated in our
previous letter, traffic, and safety. Most of the families in the area purchased their
homes because of the land use designation of low-density residential. To change the
land use designation to anything else with no proposed projects would jeopardize the
area residents’ quality of life.
The in and out access in the area is limited especially at peak rush hour and school
hour times. With the high volume of traffic in this area it is very congested and to try
to get to the freeway or other main roads is very challenging. In this area we have a
lot of residents who take advantage of the walking and biking trails by the river and
the area in general and find it difficult to walk safely with all the traffic. To add more
additional residential homes and/or units would add to the congestion.
We hope that you will take the time to drive in this area at the rush hour/peak times to
see the difficulty we all face here. We hope you will keep the designation as it
currently stands for the safety and security of the current residents.
Respectfully submitted
Kay & Al Slahtasky
10203 W. Willow Road
Page 99 of 306
Pasco, WA
Virus-free.www.avg.com
Page 100 of 306
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 5, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/9/24
FROM: Jacob Gonzalez, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Presentation - Code Enforcement Program (15 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
PowerPoint Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presentation - City of Pasco's Code Enforcement Program by Troy Hendren,
Inspection Services Manager and Rosanna Johnson, Lead Code Enforcement
Officer.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
code State Washington under city non-charter as Pasco, of City The a
Constitution Article 11, Section 10, and RCW Title 35A, has the authority to
adopt and enforce ordinances that promote the health, safety, and welfare of
its citizens. In 1996, the City established an enhanced Code Enforcement
Program to decriminalize code violations and create an efficient system for
enforcing city regulations. This program provides a process for prompt
hearings on violations, imposes monetary penalties as authorized by RCW
35A.11.020, and outlines procedures for addressing unsafe or unlawful
conditions.
The program's authority is defined in Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 1.40,
covering enforcement and education on fire hazards, business licenses, rental
housing maintenance, zoning, health and sanitation, public right-of-way
misuse, water and sewer violations, signage, noise regulation, abandoned
vehicles, public nuisances, and building codes.
Page 101 of 306
Pasco's enhanced Code Enforcement Program plays a vital role in maintaining
community safety, health, and resilience, supporting economic growth and
vitality, and reducing the financial impact of preventable emergencies. An
effective Code Enforcement program substantially decreases slum and blight,
protecting the taxable value and property tax revenues received by the City. By
proactively addressing hazards, such as fire risks, unsafe buildings, and
obstructions in public rights-of-way, the program significantly reduces dangers
during emergency response situations, helping first responders access
ensures program the Furthermore, quickly and more properties safely.
compliance with newly adopted codes, aligning with both City Council’s and
citizens' vision for Pasco’s future. This helps safeguard the City's long-term
growth, sustainability, and quality of life for its residents.
V. DISCUSSION:
A presentation has been prepared by Community and Economic Development
Department staff:
Troy Hendren, Inspection Services Manager
Rosanna Johnson, Lead Code Enforcement Officer
Page 102 of 306
Pasco City Council Meeting
September 9th, 2024
CODE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
Pa
g
e
1
0
3
o
f
3
0
6
Program Administration
Code Enforcement is the process
used by local governments to
ensure conformance with state and
local laws, codes, or ordinances
adopted by the City Council
regulating public nuisances, public
health, safety and welfare.
What is Code Enforcement?
Pa
g
e
1
0
4
o
f
3
0
6
Imminent Hazards
Dangerous & Abandoned Structures
Property Maintenance Standards
Rental Licensing & Inspection Program
Itinerant Vendor Inspections
Construction Activity & Standards
Health & Sanitation
Public Nuisances
Zoning
Water & Sewers
Dust & Erosion
Noise
Abatements
Chronic Nuisances
Fire Hazards
Referral & Inspections for CDBG Projects
What does Code Enforcement do?
Program Administration
Pa
g
e
1
0
5
o
f
3
0
6
Program Administration
How would you handle
this situation?
•Fire Department has left
•Owner cannot act
•Surrounded by residential homes
•20+mph winds expected
What does Code Enforcement investigate?
Pa
g
e
1
0
6
o
f
3
0
6
Program Administration
How is Code Enforcement Staffed & Administered?
Community & Economic
Development Director & Deputy
Inspection Services Manager, Fire
Marshal/Building Official
Lead Code Officer
Code Officer
Code Officer
(VACANT)
(Partially Funded
by CDBG)
Code Officer
(VACANT)
Rental Inspector
(Funded by CDBG)
Rental Inspector
(Temporary
Position)
Code Enforcement Program Rental Program
Pa
g
e
1
0
7
o
f
3
0
6
Program Administration
General Fund,
$233,761
CDBG ,
$87,000
REVENUE 2024
General Fund
CDBG
Pa
g
e
1
0
8
o
f
3
0
6
Program Administration
How are issues reported for investigation?
•In Person
•Phone
•Email
•E-Trakit
•Carrier Pigeon
•USPS Mail
•AskPasco App
•In field
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 - YTD
Total Reports by Year
Issues Reported by Year
Total AskPasco Converted to Cases
Pa
g
e
1
0
9
o
f
3
0
6
Program Administration
How are issues prioritized for investigation?
All reports are investigated for code compliance, If no violation exists, the complaint is closed.
Pa
g
e
1
1
0
o
f
3
0
6
Program Administration
Code Enforcement Process
Complaint
Received
Investigation &
Discussion
Correction Notice
Issued
10 days to comply
Inspect for
Compliance
Notice of Civil
Violation Issued
for Hearing
Inspect for
Compliance
Refer to Code
Board Hearing for
Penalty
Code Board Issues
Determination
Daily Penalty
Begins & Ends
Inspect for
Compliance
Penalty Invoice
Mailed
Lien Drafted &
Sent to Finance
Lien Filed &
Remains Until In
Compliance
Case Open Until
Paid
If in compliance before
the Code Board
Hearing, case is closed.
*Repeat Violations must proceed through CEB process
Pa
g
e
1
1
1
o
f
3
0
6
Goal: Education Before Enforcement
Outreach &
Education
Community
Partnerships
Citizen
Engagement
Pa
g
e
1
1
2
o
f
3
0
6
Proactive v. Reactive Code Enforcement
Program Type Pros Cons Relation to Targets
Proactive Programs Identify & address issues early,
maintain community standards,
reduce long-term costs
Requires more staffing,
potential for perceived
overreach
Prevention, Consistency,
Reduced Emergency Costs
Reactive Programs Focuses on citizen complaints,
responsive to most immediate
needs
Leads to worsening conditions,
inequity in enforcement, higher
long-term costs
Immediate Investigation
Current Program Structure
Pa
g
e
1
1
3
o
f
3
0
6
Program Administration
Why is Code Enforcement a necessity in every jurisdiction?
Reduces liability on the city
Legal framework for city to act when necessary
Responsive local government
Decreases slum & blight
Protects taxable valuation and revenue to the City
Separate civil from criminal violations of law
Pa
g
e
1
1
4
o
f
3
0
6
A Resilient
Community
Life
Health
Safety
Impact of Equitable Code Enforcement
Pa
g
e
1
1
5
o
f
3
0
6
Pasco Council Goals & Code Enforcement
Council Goals 2024-2025
Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs and
services
Community Safety
Promote and encourage economic vitality
City Identity
Pa
g
e
1
1
6
o
f
3
0
6
Resources & Information
https://www.facebook.com/PascoInspectionServices
City of Pasco Good Neighbor Handbook *Editing & translation in process - Contact the office at (509) 543-5743 to verify information.
City of Pasco Code Division – Report a Violation, Read more about services and the Rental Program
Washington Association of Code Enforcement
American Association of Code Enforcement
Code Enforcement Officer Cora Teaches Code Enforcement – A Code Enforcement Coloring Book, 4LEAF, Inc.
The Importance of Code Enforcement - by Laura Rouse-Devore, 1st vice president of the Illinois association of code enforcement.
Healthy Housing Reference Manual – U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
Code Enforcement: Critical for a Successful Fire Prevention Program – Fire Engineering University, PennWell by Ben Coffman
Code Enforcement & Nuisances - Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington (MRSC)
What is Code Enforcement? – Center for Community Progress
What is a Code Officer and How to Become One – ZipRecruiter Marketplace Research Team
The Code Division was created to ensure the City of Pasco stay clean, safe and maintain a healthy living and working
environment. The Pasco City Council authorizes the Code Division staff to enforce the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC)
through education, inspections and formal notices to those remaining violations.
Pa
g
e
1
1
7
o
f
3
0
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 5, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/9/24
FROM: Eric Ferguson, City Attorney
City Attorney
SUBJECT: Presentation - Animal Control Authority Structure (10 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
2005 Animal Control Authority ILA
2016 Animal Control Authority ILA
Operating Jurisdiction ILA
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Tri-City Animal Control Authority (ACA) was established in 1998 as an
intergovernmental authority between the cities of Pasco, Kennewick, and
Richland. The ACA oversees both sheltering and enforcement operations
related to animal control. The intent is to provide animal control services “on a
shared basis in a manner deemed most efficient and effective for the cities.”
The ACA operates under the direction of a Management Committee, which
includes the City Manager, or his/her designee from each city. While Pasco
has the 2007, since Jurisdiction as the designated been Operating
Management Committee is responsible for determining the most effective way
to deliver services. The Operating Jurisdiction handles key administrative tasks
such support as managing service contracts, financial management, and
services necessary for the implementation of the Animal Control Plan, which is
approved by all participating cities.
Page 118 of 306
Historically, the City of Pasco, as the Operating Jurisdiction, has been
responsible for recruiting and entering into a contract that has been approved
by the Management Committee to provide animal control services through
procurement of an independent contractor. As of 2022, the City of Pasco has
assumed thereby directly, services control the providing of role animal
establishing the City of Pasco as the Operating Jurisdiction and the service
provider.
V. DISCUSSION:
Recently, multiple inquiries have been made about the current structure of the
ACA, as well as the breadth of services that are provided by the ACA members
and the Operating Jurisdiction. The intent of this initial presentation is to
educate the Council on the basic governance structure, status of agreements,
as well as to allow Council the opportunity to provide staff with feedback about
any potential changes moving forward.
Page 119 of 306
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF
RICHLAND, PASCO, KENNEWICK WASHINGTON FOR ANIMAL CONTROL
THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT is entered into this Za day of , 2005,
among the City of Kennewick, Washington hereinafter referred to as ' Ke ewick",
Pasco, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "Pasco', and Richland, Washington,
hereinafter referred to as "Richland", all municipal corporations of the State of
Washington collective referred to as "Cities".
WHEREAS, the Cities are, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 R.C.W. the Interlocal
Cooperation Act, authorized to exercise their powers jointly thereby maximizing their
ability to provide services and facilities which will best fulfill common needs of the Cities,
and;
WHEREAS, the Cities, by their respective City Councils, have determined that
animal control services may be best implemented on a shared basis in a manner
deemed most efficient and effective for the cities, now, therefore, and in consideration of
the mutual covenants contained herein, it is agreed as follows:
SECTION I
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Interlocal Agreement is:
1. To create and establish a Tri -City Animal Control Authority to provide for the
common administration and enforcement of Animal Control Regulations
throughout all three participating Cities, on a cooperative and consistent basis.
2. To create a Management Committee to determine the best manner in which to
provide animal control services including contracting with independent contractor
or a member entity for the provision of some or all of the Animal Control Services
required for the purpose of sharing the services and responsibilities among the
Cities in the most efficient manner;
3. To select and empower a City to serve as the Operative Jurisdiction for the day
to day management of Animal Control Services including providing, if necessary,
the manpower and facilities required to carry out all or a portion of the animal
control function as identified in the Agreement;
4. To equally share the cost of basic Animal Control Services provided in this
Agreement;
5. To achieve an overall cost savings for Animal Control Service to each city by
avoiding redundant expenses, activities and facilities while enjoying the
efficiencies of scale based upon service to the combined territorial jurisdictions of
the Cities; and
13{
Page 120 of 306
N
6. Preserving to each city its ability to establish its own individual standards,
regulations and fees for animal control; and
7. To provide for efficient and effective Animal Control Services for the citizens of
the Cities.
SECTION II
ADMINISTRATION
Administration of the Tri -City Animal Control Authority shall be conducted in the
following manner.
2.1 Management Committee. The City Manager or his designee from each of the
Cities shall constitute the Management Committee. The Management
Committee shall meet not less than once per calendar quarter as necessary to
accomplish the purposes of this Interlocal Cooperative Agreement. The
Management Committee shall be responsible for preparing a plan for Animal
Control Services, subject to approval by the council of each city for providing
Animal Control Services within the total jurisdictional territory of the Cities. The
Management Committee shall:
a) Be responsible for establishing policies for implementation of the
Animal Control Plan adopted by the Cities;
b) Approve and execute contracts for services necessary for the
implementation of the plan;
c) Develop a proposed annual budget for presentation to each City
Council for approval and adoption for each calendar year during the
term of this Agreement;
d) Provide reports of the activities and progress of the plan for each City
Council;
e) Provide a venue for dispute resolution among participants of the
Animal Control Plan; and
f) To provide such administrative assistance, expertise and direction as
is necessary for the successful implementation of the Animal Control
Plan.
The representative of the Operating Jurisdiction shall serve as the chair of the
Management Committee.
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
TRI -CITY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES -2-
Page 121 of 306
2.2 Operating Jurisdiction. One of the Cities shall be designated as the Operating
Jurisdiction for the Tri -City Animal Control Authority. The Operating Jurisdiction
shall be responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Animal Control Services
including the enforcement of the rules, regulations and ordinances of the
participating jurisdictions. All municipal employees, resources and facilities
required in the implementation of the plan shall be employees and assets of the
Operating Jurisdiction. The Operating Jurisdiction will provide all necessary
support services for the implementation of the Animal Control Plan such as
accounting, legal services, risk management and personnel management. The
Operating Jurisdiction will manage all contracts with any independent contractors
or other entities for services performed under the Animal Control Plan and
administer all rules, regulations and policies established by the Management
Committee and issue a periodical report to the Management Committee on the
implementation of the Animal Control Plan.
The City of Kennewick is designated as the Operating Jurisdiction for 2004-2006;
City of Pasco for 2007-2009; and City of Richland 2010-2012.
SECTION III
ANIMAL CONTROL PLAN BASIC SERVICES
The Animal Control Plan as developed by the Management Committee and
approved by each city, shall provide as a base level of service the following:
a) Regulation and apprehension of vicious or dangerous animals;
b) Removal of dead animals from the public right of way;
c) Apprehension of stray animals;
d) Impounding and boarding of apprehended animals;
e) Euthanasia of unclaimed animals;
f) Disposal of animal remains;
g) Enforcement of licensing regulations; and
h) Owner notification of found animals and indenti-code retrievals
The level of the above -enumerated Animal Control Services together with the
method, and manner of the delivery of such services shall be delineated in the Animal
Control Plan.
The Cities may modify the scope of the base level of services by mutual agreement
as provided below.
Nothing herein will limit the City from securing additional Animal Control Services
above and beyond those basic Animal Control Services enumerated above, from the
Operating Jurisdiction by contract for additional fees independently negotiated for those
additional services.
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
TRI -CITY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES -3-
Page 122 of 306
SECTION IV
ASSESSMENT AND REIMBURSEMENT
The Management committee shall submit an annual budget of expenses for
Animal Control Services for approval by each of the Cities. Each City shall maintain by
ordinance or regulation its own rates and charges for compliance with their respective
animal codes and fines and forfeitures for its enforcement within its territorial
jurisdiction. All revenues derived therefrom shall be solely the revenues of that City.
The approved operating budget shall consist of basic fixed cost which will be equally
divided among the Cities and variable expense which shall be divided among the Cities
based iupon their -percentages of use. The specific fund necessary for the
implementation of this Agreement shall be maintained at the Operating Jurisdiction and
shall be designated the "Tri -City Animal Control Operating Fund."
SECTION V
MODIFICATION
The Cities agree that except for approval of the Animal Control Plan, and annual
budgets as submitted by the Management Committee, this Agreement is the complete
expression of the terms hereto and any prior written or verbal representations or
understandings not incorporated herein are excluded. The Cities reserve the right to
modify this Agreement by mutual assent in writing and signed by all parties hereto.
SECTION VI
OPERATING JURISDICTION INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The Operating Jurisdiction shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by
the Operating Jurisdiction, their agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
Minimum Scope of Insurance
Operating Jurisdiction shall obtain insurance of the types described below:
Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non -owned, hired
and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services
Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent
liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide
contractual liability coverage.
2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO
occurrence form CG 00 01. Non-operating jurisdictions shall be
named as an insured under the Operating Jurisdiction's Commercial
General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed
for the Cities using ISO Additional Insured endorsement CG 20 10 10
01 or substitute endorsements providing equivalent coverage.
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
TRI -CITY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES -4-
Page 123 of 306
3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial
Insurance laws of the State of Washington.
Minimum Amounts of Insurance
Operating Jurisdiction shall maintain the following insurance limits:
1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for
bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident.
2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no
less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate.
Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following
provisions for Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance:
1. The Operating Jurisdiction insurance coverage shall be primary
insurance in respect to the non-operating jurisdictions. Any Insurance,
self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the non-
operating jurisdictions shall be excess of the Operating Jurisdictions
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
2. The Operating Jurisdictions insurance shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30)
days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has
been given to the City.
D. Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than
A:VII.
E. Verification of Coverage
Operating Jurisdiction shall furnish non-operating jurisdictions with original certificates
and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the
additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the
Operating Jurisdiction before commencement of the work.
OPERATING JURISDICTION INDEMNIFICATION / HOLD HARMLESS
The Operating Jurisdiction shall defend, indemnify and hold non-operating jurisdictions,
their officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims,
injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or in connection
with the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the
sole negligence of the non-operating jurisdictions.
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
TRI -CITY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES -5-
Page 124 of 306
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Any independent contractors providing Animal Control Services under the Animal
Control Plan shall procure and maintain public liability insurance naming the Cities as
additional insured's with coverage limits no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000)
per occurrence, two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate for bodily injury and property
damage applicable to all activities performed under the terms of the Animal Control
Plan,
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS INDEMNIFICATION / HOLD HARMLESS
Any independent contractors providing Animal Control Services under the Animal
Control Plan shall defend, indemnify and hold the Cities, their officers, officials,
employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses
or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of
Agreements, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of either
Richland, Kennewick, or Pasco.
SECTION VII
TERM OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION
This Agreement shall become effective on the 1St day of January, 2004 and shall
expire on December 31, 2012. This Agreement will automatically be renewed annually
unless any City gives written notice of its intent to terminate this Agreement. A City may
terminate participation in this Agreement prior to adoption of the Animal Control Plan
upon 30 days advanced written notice. This Agreement will automatically terminate if
the Cities are unable to adopt an Animal Control Plan within 30 days of its presentation
to the Cities by the Management Committee, unless such period is extended by mutual
agreement of the parties. After adoption of the Animal Control Plan a City may
terminate participation giving written notice of its intent to withdraw at least twelve
months prior to the designated date of withdrawal. Upon notice of withdrawal by any
City, the remaining Cities may elect to continue participation in this Interlocal
Cooperative Agreement or to terminate this Agreement. Withdrawal during any
calendar year shall not entitle the withdrawing party to a reduction or refund with respect
to funds budgeted for or otherwise committed with respect to the withdrawing party for
any calendar year.
SECTION VIII
INSPECTION OF RECORDS
The records and documents with respect to all matters covered by this Interlocal
Cooperative Agreement shall be subject to inspection, review or audit by any City during
any term if this Agreement and for three years after its termination.
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
TRI -CITY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES -6-
Page 125 of 306
SECTION IX
SEVERABILITY
In the event any term or condition of this Interlocal Cooperative Agreement or
application thereof to any person, entity or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity
shall not effect any other terms, conditions or applications of this Agreement which can
be given effect without the invalid term, condition, or application. To this end, the terms
and conditions of this agreement are declared severable.
SECTION X
FILING
As provided by RCW 39.34.040, this Agreement shall be filed prior to its entry in
force with the required City Clerks, the County Auditor, and the Secretary of State and if
found to be necessary, with the Office of Community Affairs as provided by RCW
39.34.120.
SECTION XI
AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may only be amended by written agreement of all the undersigned
cities. In witness whereof, the parties have signed this Agreement of the day and year
written above.
THE CITY OF KENNEWICK:
James R. Bea er, Mayor
Approved as to form;
ohn S. ZiciTro, City ATtorney
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
TRI -CITY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES -7-
Page 126 of 306
Attest:
Webs er U. Jackso , City Clerk
Approved as t For
Leland D Kerr, Attorney
THE CITY OFFRICHLAND:
11
BY: 1%41 I, h
Rol5ert A. etch, Mayor
Attest:
Cydthia John o , City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Thomas O. Lampson, City Atf6rney
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
TRI -CITY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES -8-
Page 127 of 306
STATE OF WASHINGTON
ss.
County of Benton
On this day personally appeared before me James R. Beaver, Mayor of the City
of Kennewick, to be known to be the individual described in and who executed the
within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free
and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this /-W°41 day of 44aLgl2dyd, 2005.
2: l'1/J,%// &L/l_ L i'/,n_ii/Cr_
NOTARY PUBLI in and for the
State f Washingtqn, residdLipg
491k i.g g +f40: at :Ji2zl,h) V Q
opu„A NMyCommission Expires: /iD9-aG
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
TRI -CITY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES -9-
Page 128 of 306
STATE OF WASHINGTON
County of Franklin
On this day personally appeared before me Michael Garrison, Mayor of the City
of Pasco, to be known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and
voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this & day of 2005
U
4 , b
zz
BLI
t°{y'•tSf i
3;`NOTAgy •oz
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
TRI -CITY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES -10-
NOTALIC in and for the
State of Washington, residing
at: l,, Cd0
My Commission Expires: 7 O
Page 129 of 306
STATE OF WASHINGTON
ss.
County of Benton
On this day personally appeared before me Robert A. Welch, Mayor of the City of
Richland, to be known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and
voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned..
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this o2-3 day of &Isl' .2005.
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
TRI -CITY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES -11-
ti C
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the
State of Washington, residing
at : n-an wn
My Commission Expire : 11 a
Page 130 of 306
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF:
City of Pasco, Washington
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Pasco
525 North 3`d
Pasco WA 99301
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Between
CITIES OF PASCO, RICHLAND, AND KENNEWICK WASHINGTON
For
CREATION AND OPERATION OF
TRI -CITIES ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY
THIS TERLOC L COO TIVE AGREEMENT, is made and entered
into this UU1I // a of e6 2016, pursuant to the Interlocal
Cooperation Act, RCW 39.34, by and between the City of Pasco, a municipal
corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "Pasco', the City of
Kennewick, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to
as "Kennewick," and the City of Richland, a municipal corporation of the State of
Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "Richland," and collectively referred to as
Cities" or "Participating Jurisdictions."
WHEREAS, the Cities are, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW the Interlocal
Cooperation Act, authorized to exercise their powers jointly thereby maximizing their
ability to provide services and facilities which will best fulfill common needs of the
Cities, and;
WHEREAS, the Cities, by their respective City Councils, have determined that
animal control services may be best implemented on a shared basis in a manner deemed
most efficient and effective for the Cities; and
WHEREAS, the Cities agree that this Agreement shall replace all prior
Interlocal Agreements and amendments thereof and all Operating Jurisdiction
Agreements and amendments thereof, that may have governed the subject of this
Agreement.
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 1
Page 131 of 306
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenant contained herein, it
is agreed by and between the Parties hereto as follows:
1. Purpose.
A) To establish and maintain the Tri -City Animal Control Authority
ACA) created by Interlocal Cooperative Agreement to provide for animal
control services among the Participating Jurisdictions and potential service
subscribers.
B) To replace all previous Interlocal Cooperative Agreements and
all amendments thereto that previously created and established the current ACA.
C) To provide for a Management Committee to determine the best
manner in which to provide animal control services, including contracting with
independent contractor(s) or a member entity for the provision of some or all of
the animal control services required for the purpose of sharing the services and
responsibilities among the Cities in the most efficient manner.
D) To select and empower Pasco to serve as the Operating
Jurisdiction for the day to day management of animal control services, including
providing, if necessary, the manpower and facilities required to carry out all or a
portion of the animal control function as identified in the Agreement.
E) To provide a method for the sharing of the ongoing operating and
administrative costs of providing animal control services as defined in this
Agreement.
F) To achieve equitable cost sharing for each of the Cities for
animal control services, by avoiding redundant expenses, activities, and
facilities, while enjoying the efficiencies of scale resulting from a unified service
to the combined territorial jurisdictions of the Cities.
G) To preserve to each of the Cities the ability to establish and
enforce its own individual standards, regulations, and fees for animal control.
H) To provide for efficient and effective animal control services for
the citizens of the Cities.
2. Definitions. For the purpose of this Agreement, the following
definitions shall apply:
A) "Base Costs" shall mean the management, operating and capital
improvement costs or revenues, classified as "base costs" in Exhibit A,
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 2
Page 132 of 306
associated with providing aminal control services which would be present
regardless of the amount of service provided over time.
B) "Capital Improvement Cost' shall mean the costs associated with
the major maintenance and improvement of animal control authority capital
assets including its fleet, facilities and site.
C) "Cities" or "Participating Jurisdictions" shall mean the cities of
Pasco, Kennewick, and Richland, Washington, and any other municipal
corporation, which upon payment of a capital contribution for the Facility is
added as a Participating Jurisdiction as provided in Section 4.
D) "Management Costs" shall mean the costs associated with
management and administration of animal control services, including physical
facility expenses, by the operating jurisdiction.
E) "Operating Costs" shall mean all costs associated with the
administration, management, day to day operation, upkeep and maintenance of
animal control services and programs.
F) "Operating Jurisdiction" shall mean that designated Participating
Jurisdiction responsible for the day-to-day operation of the animal control
services and the administration of this Agreement, more particularly stated in
Section 3.13 below. The initial Operating Jurisdiction shall be the City of Pasco.
G) "Service Contractor" shall mean a Participating Jurisdiction or a
qualified third -party independent contractor selected to provide day-to-day
animal control services and the physical implementation of the animal control
plan.
H) "Subscriber" shall mean any municipal jurisdiction or other entity
other than a Participation Jurisdiction, which by contract, receives some or all
ACA services.
I) "Usage Costs" shall mean the management, operating and capital
improvement costs or revenues, classified as "usage costs" in Exhibit A,
associated with providing animal control services which vary by the amount of
service provided over time.
3. Administration. Administration of the ACA shall be conducted in the
following manner:
A) Management Committee. The City Manager or their designee
from each of the Participating Jurisdictions shall constitute the Management
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 3
Page 133 of 306
Committee (Committee). The Committee shall meet not less than once per
calendar quarter as necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Interlocal
Cooperative Agreement. The Committee shall be responsible for preparing a
plan for animal control services, subject to approval by the council of the Cities,
for providing animal control services within the total combined jurisdictional
territory of the Cities and any subscriber's jurisdictional territory. The City
Manager of Pasco or their designee, as the representative of the Operating
Jurisdiction, shall serve as the Chair of the Committee. The Committee shall:
1) Be responsible for establishing policies for
implementation of the Animal Control Plan adopted by the Cities.
2) Approve and execute contracts for services necessary for
the implementation of the Animal Control Plan.
3) Develop a proposed annual budget for presentation to
each of the Cities for their approval for each calendar year during the
term of this Agreement.
4) Provide reports of the activities and progress of the
Animal Control Plan to each of the Cities at least annually during the
term of this Agreement.
5) Provide a venue for dispute resolution among participants
in the Animal Control Plan.
6) Provide such administrative assistance, expertise, and
direction as is necessary for the successful implementation of the plan.
7) Secure such services as are necessary for the
implementation of the Animal Control Plan.
B) Operating Jurisdiction
1) Appointment. Pasco shall be designated as the Operating
Jurisdiction for the Tri -City Animal Control Authority unless otherwise
designated by unanimous written consent of the Participating
Jurisdictions.
2) Scope of Services for Operating Jurisdiction. The
Operating Jurisdiction shall provide the following services:
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 4
Page 134 of 306
a) The day-to-day operations of the Animal Control
Services, including the enforcement of the rules, regulations, and
ordinances of the Participating Jurisdictions.
b) All service contractors, providers, resources, and
facilities necessary for the implementation of the Animal Control
Plan shall be provided by or managed by the Operating
Jurisdiction.
c) The Operating Jurisdiction shall provide all
necessary support services for the implementation of the Animal
Control Plan, including but not limited to accounting, legal
services, records management, risk management, and personnel
management.
d) The Operating Jurisdiction will manage all
contracts with any service contractors or other entities for
services performed under the Animal Control Plan and prepare
and administer all rules and regulations.
e) The Operating Jurisdiction shall implement
policies adopted by the Committee and issue periodical reports to
the Committee on the implementation of the Animal Control
Plan.
f) Maintain a separate fund for the receipt of funds
from the Cities and for the payment of expenses for the ACA.
g) Maintain records on ACA -owned equipment and
inventory, including vehicle maintenance and replacement
accounting.
h) Schedule periodic meetings of the ACA.
i) Retain records related to the ACA pursuant to the
State's retention schedule(s) and respond in a lawful manner to
all public records requests seeking ACA related records.
3) Compensation. An estimated budget for performing the
services of the Operating Jurisdiction shall be calculated on an annual
basis. The cost-sharing method outlined in Section 7 of this Agreement
shall determine the percentage allocation of the total cost to each of the
Participating Jurisdictions. Each year, the annual budget and
compensation due to the Operating Jurisdiction by each of the other
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 5
Page 135 of 306
Participating Jurisdictions shall be determined by the Committee prior to
September 1 of the prior year. Any extraordinary or unanticipated
cumulative expenses that may exceed the annual budget, must be
approved by unanimous written consent of the Participating
Jurisdictions. Each of the Participating Jurisdictions, other than Pasco,
shall be responsible for payment of their pro -rata share of the
compensation for the Operating Jurisdiction. As the Operating
Jurisdiction, Pasco shall bill each of the other Participating Jurisdiction
monthly, in conjunction with the billing for the monthly animal control
contractor payments, that Participating Jurisdiction's share of the annual
compensation.
4. Admission of New Particinatine Jurisdictions and Subscribers.
A) Process for Adding New Participating Jurisdictions. Upon
receipt of a written request by a jurisdiction to join as a Participating Jurisdiction
in the ACA, the Committee may, upon unanimous approval, admit the applicant
as a Participating Jurisdiction subject to determination of its proportionate share
of facilities capital contribution, and of its operating costs which will be
included in a written Addendum to this Agreement.
B) Subscriber. Upon receipt of a written request by a jurisdiction or
other entity to receive a portion or all of ACA's services for a contract fee, the
amount and scope of such services will be included in a written Agreement.
5. Service Contractor. A service contractor shall be selected by the
unanimous approval of the Committee to provide animal control services and
implement and perform the Animal Control Plan. The services of the service contractor
shall be managed by the Operating Jurisdiction pursuant to the terms of an Agreement
negotiated between the ACA and the service contractor.
6. Animal Control Plan Basic Services. The Animal Control Plan as
developed by the Committee and approved by the legislative body of each Participating
Jurisdiction, shall provide a base level of services for each of the Participating
Jurisdictions:
A) Shelter and holding of stray and owner surrender animals.
B) Enforcement of animal control ordinances of Participating
Jurisdictions.
C) Cooperation with police departments and licensing programs of
Participating Jurisdictions.
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 6
Page 136 of 306
D) Animal Control Authority sponsored or provided programs to
provide for or further adoption of stray or owner surrender animals and control
the size of such animal populations
E) Regulation and apprehension of vicious or dangerous animals.
F) Removal of dead animals from the public right-of-way.
G) Apprehension of stray animals.
H) Impounding and boarding of apprehended animals.
I) Euthanasia of unclaimed animals.
J) Disposal of animal remains.
K) Owner notification of found animals and identi-code retrievals.
The level of the above -enumerated Animal Control Services together with the
method and manner of the delivery of such services shall be delineated in the Animal
Control Plan. The Participating Jurisdictions may modify the scope of the base level of
services by mutual agreement.
Nothing herein will limit any of the Participating Jurisdictions from individually
securing additional Animal Control Services above and beyond those basic services
enumerated above and in the Animal Control Plan, from the Operating Jurisdiction, by
contract for additional fees. Any such services shall be negotiated independently of this
Agreement.
7. Cost Sharing Assessment and Reimbursement. The Operating
Jurisdiction shall submit an annual budget on or before August 15 of each year, of
expenses for Animal Control Services for approval by the Committee. Subscriber fees
shall be included in the proposed budget. Each Participating Jurisdiction shall maintain
by ordinance or regulation its own rates and charges for compliance with their
respective animal codes and fines and forfeitures for its enforcement within its
territorial jurisdiction. All revenues derived therefrom shall be solely the revenues of
that Participating Jurisdiction. The specific fund necessary for the implementation of
this Agreement shall be maintained at the Operating Jurisdiction and shall be designated
the "Tri -City Animal Control Operating Fund."
A) Capital Improvement Cost Sharing. Costs for capital
improvements approved by the Participating Jurisdictions, shall be shared
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 7
Page 137 of 306
equally among the Participating Jurisdictions. The Operating Jurisdiction shall
bill the Participating Jurisdictions on behalf of the ACA.
B) Operating Cost Sharing. The cost of animal control authority
operations including physical facility, maintenance and operating costs,
administrative costs, management costs, and program costs, shall be shared
among the ACA facility Participating Jurisdictions and subscribers to animal
control authority services. Operating costs shall be classified as either base costs
or usage costs according to the cost classification system established and
periodically amended by the Committee in Exhibit A to this Agreement. The
annual operating cost sharing formula established in subsection D) below of this
section shall be used by the Operating Jurisdiction to bill the Participating
Jurisdictions and subscribers monthly.
C) ACA Budget. The Committee shall adopt a budget annually.
Incident to budget approval shall be the ability to reclassify the distribution of
costs as identified in Exhibit A. The budget shall encompass all ACA facility,
program and administrative costs. The budget and annual cost sharing formula
to be applied to the budget, shall be submitted as approved by the Committee, to
Participating Jurisdictions and subscribers by September 15 of each year.
D) Annual Operating Cost Sharing Formula. The costs included in
Exhibit A to this Agreement will be shared initially among the Participating
Jurisdictions of the ACA facility based on a two-part formula. The fust part of
the formula covers base costs and the second part covers usage costs. Initially,
the base cost and usage cost share for each Participating Jurisdiction will be
added together to establish the total cost share for each Participating
Jurisdiction.
1) Base costs will be shared equally among the Participating
Jurisdictions. The initial three (3) Participating Jurisdictions would share
base costs on a one-third basis.
2) Usage costs will be shared proportionately among the
Participating Jurisdictions based on the intake of animals. Animal intake
shall be determined on the basis of a five-year average of annual data
January 1 to December 31) and shall include all types and breeds of
animals. A rolling five years of annual data available at the time that the
Committee submits its budget and collected and reported by the ACA
shall be used for this purpose.
3) Additional contract services as provided for in Section 6
of this Agreement, shall be included in the budget and will be paid in full
by the contracting jurisdiction.
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 8
Page 138 of 306
4) Beginning January 1, 2017 the ACA shall collect and
report monthly data on calls for service from each jurisdiction receiving
services from the ACA. Calls for service will be defined and data shall
be reported in a manner and format approved by the Committee.
5) Beginning with the 2023 annual ACA budget, the
Committee shall modify the usage cost sharing portion of the formula to
be applied in 2023 by averaging five running years of annual data for
calls for service and animal intake for each Participating Jurisdiction.
Equal weight will be given in the formula to intake and calls for service.
The base cost sharing formula shall remain the same. The application of
the base and usage cost formula and its calculation shall be submitted
with each budget.
E) Change in Cost Sharing Formula Due to Addition or Deletion of
Participating Jurisdictions or Subscribers. The cost sharing formula will be
modified when Participating Jurisdiction or subscribers to ACA services are
added or deleted from ACA agreements. Participating Jurisdictions would
continue to share facility operating costs and base costs in equal shares
determined by dividing total facility operating and base costs by the number of
Participating Jurisdictions.
Usage costs would continue to be shared based on the proportional usage
of all Participating Jurisdictions and subscribers. Until 2023 the usage cost
formula based on animal intake in subsection D)5) above would apply, in 2023
and thereafter the cost sharing formula based on a combination of animal intake
and calls for service in subsection D)2) above would apply. Additional
Participating Jurisdictions or subscriber's usage cost share would be determined
according to annual data available at the time, which may initially be an
estimate, followed by one year of data building over five years to a five-year
average.
8. Integration. Modification and Severability. The Participating
Jurisdictions agree that except for (a) the Personal Services Agreement with the service
contractor; (b) annual budgets as submitted by the Committee including any
reassignment of the allocation of costs as provided in Exhibit A; and (c) the Interlocal
Agreement Between the Cities of Pasco, Kennewick and Richland for the Construction
of an Animal Control Authority Facility, this Agreement is the complete expression of
the terms hereto and any prior written or verbal representations or understandings not
incorporated herein are excluded. This Agreement may be modified, amended, or
terminated only upon written agreement upon unanimous approval of the Participating
Jurisdictions. In the event any term or condition of this Agreement or application
thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance is help invalid, such invalidity shall not
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 9
Page 139 of 306
affect any other terms, conditions, or applications of this Agreement that can be given
effect without the invalid term, condition, or application., and such provisions shall be
deemed modified to secure such invalidity. To this end, the terms and conditions of this
Agreement are declared severable.
9. Oneratin¢ Jurisdictional Insurance Requirements. The Operating
Jurisdiction shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance
against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in
connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Operating Jurisdiction,
their agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. Any waiver by any party
hereto with regard to any of its rights hereunder shall be in writing and shall not
constitute or act as a waiver to any future rights which such party might have hereunder.
A) Minimum Insurance Requirements. The Operating Jurisdiction
shall obtain insurance of the types described below:
1) Automobile Liability insurance covering all Participating
Jurisdiction, non -owned, hired, and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be
written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute
form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy
shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage.
2) Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written
on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01. Non-operating jurisdictions shall be
named as an insured under the Operating Jurisdiction's Commercial
General Liability insurance policy with respect for the work performed
for the Cities using ISO Additional Insured endorsement CG 20 10 10 01
or substitute endorsements providing equivalent coverage.
3) Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the
Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington.
B) Minimum Amounts of Insurance. The Operating Jurisdiction
shall maintain the following insurance limits:
1) Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum
combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of
1,000,000 per accident.
2) Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written
with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general
aggregate.
C) Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to
Interlocal Agreement —Operation of ACA - 10
Page 140 of 306
contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Automobile
Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance:
1) The Operating Jurisdiction insurance coverage shall be
primary insurance in respect to the non-operating jurisdictions. Any
insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the
non-operating jurisdictions shall be excess of the Operating Jurisdictions
insurance.
2) The Operating Jurisdictions insurance shall be endorsed
to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after
thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt
requested, has been given to the City.
D) Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be places with insurers
with a current (at time of placement) A.M. best rating of not less than A: VII.
E) Verification of Coverage. The Operating Jurisdiction shall
famish the Participating Jurisdictions with original certificates and a copy of the
amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional
insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Operating
Jurisdiction before commencement of the work.
F) Participation in a Governmental Self -Insured Risk Pool,
Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) shall satisfy all conditions set
forth in Section 9 of this Agreement.
10. Operating Jurisdiction Indemnification/Hold Harmless. The
Operating Jurisdiction shall defend, indemnify, and hold the other Participating
jurisdictions, their officers, officials, employees, and volunteers harmless from any and
all claims, injuries, damages, losses, or suits, including attorney fees, arising out of or in
connection with the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages
caused by the sole negligence of the non-operating jurisdictions.
11. Service Contractors Insurance Requirements. Any service
contractors providing all or a portion of Animal Control Services under the Animal
Control Plan shall procure and maintain commercial general liability (CGL) insurance
naming the Participating Jurisdictions as additional insured's with coverage limits no
less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, two million dollars
2,000,000) aggregate for bodily injury and property damage applicable to all activities
performed under the terms of this Agreement and/or the Animal Control Plan.
12. Service Contractors Indemnification/Hold Harmless. Any service
contractors providing all or a portion of Animal Control Services under the Animal
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 11
Page 141 of 306
Control Plan shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Participating Jurisdictions,
their officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and an all claims, injuries,
damages, losses, or suits, including attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with
the performance of this Agreement and all other Agreements governing the Animal
Control Plan, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of any of
the Participating Jurisdictions.
13. Term of Agreement and Termination. This Agreement shall become
effective upon acceptance and occupancy of Phase I of the Animal Control Authority
Facility, and shall expire on December 31, 2027. This Agreement will automatically
renew in five year increments unless any Participating Jurisdiction gives written notice
of its intent to withdraw from this Agreement, at least twenty-four (24) months prior to
the date of withdrawal. Upon notice of withdrawal by any of the Participating
Jurisdictions, the remaining Participating Jurisdictions may elect to continue
participation in this Interlocal Cooperative Agreement or to terminate this Agreement.
Withdrawal of a Participating Jurisdiction in any calendar year other than as provided
above, shall not entitle the withdrawing Participating Jurisdiction to a reduction or
refund with respect to the funds budgeted for or otherwise committed for the remaining
term up to the effective date of the withdrawal.
14. Facilities Maintenance and Operation. Upon acceptance and
occupancy of the Animal Control Authority Facility, the terms of this Agreement shall
govern the use, maintenance and operation of the facility. The Facility shall
immediately be made available for use by the ACA and all third -party contractors for
services to the ACA. Rental of any portions of the Facility not occupied by ACA, or its
third -party contractor, may be available for sublet and on such terns as approved by the
Committee with the rental proceeds being applied against the cost of maintenance of the
facility.
15. Disposition of Property. In the event of termination of the ACA;
failure of any party to adopt an Animal Control Plan as provided in this Agreement; or
in the event a party gives notice of intent to withdraw, the remaining parties may elect
to continue participation in this Agreement, or to terminate this Agreement. On such
event, the Parties shall determine a fair market value of the facility by an MAI qualified
appraiser selected by a majority vote of the Committee. Such selected appraiser shall
provide the appraised value to the Committee of the ACA within sixty (60) days of the
Committee's authorization to proceed with withdrawal of a party or termination of the
ACA. The remaining parties may continue by purchase of the withdrawing party or
parties' interest in the facility. In the event of termination, the facility shall be placed
for sale subject to a first right of purchase by Pasco for fair market value exercised by
giving written notice within sixty (60) days of the date the property is offered for sale
and closed within ninety (90) days thereafter; or the right of first refusal equal to any
offer received by a bona fide third -party purchaser exercised by written notice within
thirty (30) days of the Committee's acceptance of a bona fide third -party offer, and
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 12
Page 142 of 306
closed within ninety (90) days thereafter. In the event the facility is placed for sale and
Pasco does not exercise its right of first purchase nor any bona fide third party offers to
purchase have been received, the property shall be disposed by mutual agreement of the
parties with each party bearing an equal portion of the costs to maintain the property
pending disposition.
16. Inspection of Records. The records and documents with respect to all
matters covered by this Interlocal Cooperative Agreement shall be subject to inspection,
review or audit by any Participating Jurisdiction during any term of this Agreement and
for three (3) years after its termination.
17. Filing. As provided by RCW 39.34.040, prior to its entry in force, this
Agreement shall be filed with the respective City Clerk, the County Auditors for Benton
and Franklin Counties, or alternatively posted on the Participating Jurisdiction's website
or other electronically retrievable public source.
18. Amendments. This Agreement may only be amended by written
agreement of all the undersigned Participating Jurisdiction.
19. General Provisions.
A) For the purpose of this Agreement, time is of the essence
B) Dispute Resolution. In the event of a dispute regarding the
enforcement, breach, default, or interpretation of this Agreement, the City
Managers, or their designees, shall first meet in a good faith effort to resolve
such dispute. In the event the dispute cannot be resolved by agreement of the
parties, said dispute shall be resolved by arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as
amended, with both parties waiving the right of a jury trial upon trial de novo,
with venue placed in Pasco, Franklin County, Washington.
C) Interlocal Agreement. It is not intended that a separate legal
entity be established to conduct this cooperative undertaking, nor is the
acquiring, holding, or disposing of real or personal property other than as
specifically provided within the terms of this Agreement. The City Manager, or
his designee, for the City of Pasco shall be designated as the Administrator of
this Interlocal Agreement.
D) No Waiver. Any waiver by any party hereto with regard to any
of its rights hereunder, shall be in writing and shall not constitute nor act as a
waiver for any future rights in which such party may have hereunder.
20. Notices. Written notice shall be directed to the parties as follows
hiterlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 13
Page 143 of 306
City of Pasco
Attn: Dave Zabell, City Manager
PO Box 293
Pasco, WA 99301
City of Kennewick
Attn: Marie Mosley, City Manager
PO Box 6108
Kennewick, WA 99336
City of Richland
Attn: Cindy Reents, City Manager
PO Box 190
Richland, WA 99352
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned having full authorization on behalf
of the parties, have executed this Agreement on the year and date set forth above.
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
Matt Watkins, Mayor
A est
Debbie Clark,- City Clerk
Appro to Form:
Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 14
Page 144 of 306
CITY OF
Steve Young, Mayor
CITY OF RICHLAND, WASHINGTON
C
Robert Thompson, Mayo
M&4tkr jv
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 15
Attest:
v
Terri L. Wright, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Lisa Beaton, City Attorney
Attest:
Marcia Hopkins, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Heather Kintzley, City Att
Page 145 of 306
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
ss.
County of Franklin )
On this day personally appeared before me Matt Watkins, Mayor of the City of
Pasco, to be known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and
voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this _ day of s%
Notary public
State of Washington
SANDY L KENwORTHY NOTARY PUBLI and for theStateMYCOMMISSIONEXPIRES
Residing at: C2ScdAugust7, 2019
My Commission Expires: !&/P
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
ss.
County of Benton )
On this day personally appeared before me Steve Young, Mayor of the City of
Kennewick, to be known to be the individual described in and who executed the within
and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and
voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my h and official s al this y of
2016.
JEt j' N AR UB,L in and for theAState of Washington
3Cj a `gslON 'q,?i4 Residing at: 4LUAPMk@. ?C /
My Commission Expires:
OZV
A G
N5
Z
i9,
Iff&
i0
1..1` GAO`
tth;cOF wsSN:
Interlocal Agreement - Operation of ACA - 16
Page 146 of 306
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
ss.
County of Benton
On this day personally appeared before me Robert Thompson, Mayor of the City
of Richland, to be known to be the individual described in and who executed the within
and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and
voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this _Lq___ day ofpcs,+ ,
2016.
udfort—
C Iq /
NOTARYP LI m and for the State of Washington
Q P,......
B..•
RS %, Residing at: 0
t.•Fs$10 F+q:9 My Commission Expires: ifo
OU rJTARy ,'•:
cn .'..
PUBL\G
0, WASN\.a\
Interlocal Agreement — Operation of ACA - 17
Page 147 of 306
ACA Operating Agreement
Exhibit A
Note: Contracts for additional services beyond basic services are paid for by the contracting
party and included in the budget as such)
Distribution Method
Administrative and Operating Cost Allocation Base Usage
Operating Jurisdiction Compensation
Administrative Oversight x
Contract Administration and Records x
Accounting/Billing x
Staffing Salary and Benefits
Administration
Shelter Director x
Administrative Assistant x
Animal Control Enforcement Staffing First 3 FTE All other FTE
Animal Intake and Customer Service Staffing X
Animal Care and Kennel Care Staffing X
Operating Costs
Staff - Uniforms, communication, training First 3 FTE All other FTE
Animals - Food, medication, hygiene supplies,
medical supplies, handling supplies x
Office - office supplies, computers, business
license x
Facility Cleaning X
Vehicles --gas, oil, minor repair First three All other
Programs -- traps, advertising, software X
Insurance -- Vehicle, Liability and Facility x
Professional Services
Veternarian x
Legal x
Answering Service x
Cremation Services X
Vehicle Repair and Maintenance x
Other x
Facility Costs
Utilities, Internet and Garbage X
Building and Systems Repair and Maintenance x
Grounds Repair and Maintenance x
Page 148 of 306
Revenue
Facility operations revenue X
Investment interest X
Subscriber fees X
Assets
Cash Balance X
Reserves for replacement X
Facility X
Real Property X
Furnishings including modular animal housing X
Vehicles X
Equipment X
Page 149 of 306
ACA Operating Agreement
Exhibit B
Example of annual cost sharing for three owner jurisdictions:
1. Base Costs are divided equally.
Example base cost formula and its calculation
Kennewick — one third
Pasco — one third
Richland — one third
If total annual base costs were $300,000 then each owner would pay one third per year
300,000 / 3 = $100,000).
2. Usage Costs are divided proportionately based on an average of the last five full years of
animal intake data.
Example of usage cost formula and its calculation
Kennewick -39.4%
Pasco — 44.7%
Richland —15.9%
if total annual usage costs were $600,000 then each participant would pay their
proportion of the cost. Participant proportion X total usage costs = participants share of
annual cost ( 39.4% X $600,000 = $236,400).
3. Total Cost
Each owner would pay their base costs (one third) plus their usage cost (proportional
cost) per year. For example, if base cost was $100,000 plus $236,400 in usage costs then
total cost would be $336,400. It should be noted that participating jurisdictions may
contract for additional services beyond the scope provided by ACA and would pay for
those services in addition to their base and usage costs.
Page 1 of 4
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
5 Year
Average Proportion
Richland 709 587 614 449 341 540 15.9%
Kennewick 1686 1566 1452 1007 967 1335.6 39.4%
Pasco 1728 1711 1683 1351 1093 1513.2 44.7%
Total
Intake 4123 3864 3749 2807 2401 3388.8 100.0%
if total annual usage costs were $600,000 then each participant would pay their
proportion of the cost. Participant proportion X total usage costs = participants share of
annual cost ( 39.4% X $600,000 = $236,400).
3. Total Cost
Each owner would pay their base costs (one third) plus their usage cost (proportional
cost) per year. For example, if base cost was $100,000 plus $236,400 in usage costs then
total cost would be $336,400. It should be noted that participating jurisdictions may
contract for additional services beyond the scope provided by ACA and would pay for
those services in addition to their base and usage costs.
Page 1 of 4
Page 150 of 306
Example of annual cost sharing for three owners in 2022
1. Base costs would continue to be divided based on each owner paying one third.
2. Usage Costs are divided proportionately based on TWO FACTORS an average of the last
five full years of animal intake data and an average of the last full five years of calls for
service.
Example of usage cost formula and its calculation
Kennewick— 38.0% (Intake 39.4 plus Calls 36.8 divided by 2 = 38%)
Pasco — 43.3% (Intake 44.7 plus Calls 41.8 divided by 2 = 43.3%)
Richland —18.7% (Intake 15.9 plus Calls 21.4 divided by 2 = 18.7%)
INTAKE 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
5 Year
Average Proportion
Richland 709 587 614 449 341 540 15.9%
Kennewick 1686 1566 1452 1007 967 1335.6 39.4%
Pasco 1728 1711 1683 1351 1093 1513.2 44.7%
Total
Intake 1 4123 3864 1 3749 1 2807 1 2401 1 3388.8 1 100.0%
CALLS 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
5 Year
Average Proportion
Kennewick 1505 1620 1548 1591 1661 1585 36.8%
Pasco 1755 1642 1806 1856 1938 1800 41.8%
Richland 877 752 959 985.7 1029 921 21.4%
Total Calls 4144 4029 4300 4420 4615 4302 100.0%11
If total annual usage costs were $600,000 then each participant would pay their
proportion of the cost. Participant proportion X total usage costs = participants share of
annual cost (38% X $600,000 = $228,000).
3. Total Cost
Each owner would pay their base costs (one third) plus their usage cost (proportional
cost) per year. For example if base cost was $100,000 plus $228,000 in usage costs then
total cost would be $328,000. It should be noted that participating jurisdictions may
contract for additional services beyond the scope provided by ACA and would pay for
those services in addition to their base and usage costs.
Page 2 of 4
Page 151 of 306
Example of annual cost sharing for three owner jurisdictions and two subscribers
1. Base Costs are divided equally among owners.
Example base cost formula and its calculation
Kennewick — one third
Pasco — one third
Richland — one third
If total annual base costs were $300,000 then each owner would pay one third per year
300,000 / 3 = $100,000).
2. Usage Costs are divided proportionately among participants based on an average of the
last five full years of animal intake data.
Example of usage cost formula and its calculation
Kennewick — 34%
Pasco — 38.5%
Richland —13.8%
Subscriber A — 3.1%
Subscriber B —10.6%
5 Year
INTAKE 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average Proportion
Richland 709 587 614 449 341 540 13.8%
Kennewick 1686 1566 1452 1007 967 1335.6 34.0%
Pasco 1728 1711 1683 1351 1093 1513.2 38.5%
SubscriberA, 100 125 130 120 135. 122 3.1%
Subscriber 450 425 390 400 410 415 10.6%
Total Intake 4673 4414 4269 3327 2946 3925.8 100.0%
If total annual usage costs were $600,000 then each participant would pay their
proportion of the cost. Participant proportion X total usage costs = participants share of
annual cost ( 34% X $600,000 = $204,000).
3. Total Cost
Each owner would pay their base costs (one third) plus their usage cost (proportional
cost) per year. For example, if base cost was $100,000 plus $204,000 in usage costs then
total cost would be $336,400.
Page 3 of 4
Page 152 of 306
Each participant would pay only their usage cost share. For example, base cost would
be zero plus 10.6% of $600,000 = $63,600.
It should be noted that participating jurisdictions may contract for additional services
beyond the scope provided by ACA and would pay for those services in addition to their
base and usage costs.
Page 4 of 4
Page 153 of 306
Operating Jurisdiction Agreement
Animal Control Authority
This Agreement is entered into to be effective the 1 st day of January, 2007 between the City of
Kennewick, the City of Pasco and the City of Richland, all municipal corporations of the State of
Washington and collectively referred to as the Animal Control Authority, hereafter"ACA" and the City
of Pasco, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, referred to as "Pasco".
WHEREAS,pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperative Agreement for Animal Control as amended,
one of the member cities is required to serve as the Operating Jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, Pasco agrees to serve as the Operating Jurisdiction under the terms and conditions
set forth herein,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties
agree as follows:
1. Appointment. Pasco shall serve as the Operating Jurisdiction for the ACA pursuant to
Section II, Administration, of the Interlocal Cooperative Agreement for Animal Control.
2.Scope of Services. Pasco shall perform the following services as operating jurisdiction:
a.Maintain a separate fund for the receipt of funds from the ACA cities and for
the payment of expenses for the ACA.
b.Provide administrative oversight to the ACA's contractor for animal control
and sheltering services.
C.Maintain records on ACA owned equipment and.inventory, including vehicle
maintenance and replacement accounting.
d.Schedule meetings of the ACA, as needed, including agenda and minute
preparation.
e.Provide legal counsel services to the ACA through its appointed City Attorney.
3.Compensation. Compensation for performing the services of the Operating Jurisdiction,
excluding legal services (2 e.), shall be paid to Pasco on an annual basis as outlined in Exhibit
A" for the 2007 budget year,pro-rated to reflect a start date of 4/1/07. Compensation for each
subsequent year shall be determined by the parties prior to November 15t of each year, but in no
event shall the total of Operating Jurisdiction compensation exceed four (4)percent of the animal
control and sheltering services contract cost for the respective operating year.
Each of the ACA cities shall be responsible for payment of an equal share of the compensation
for the Operating Jurisdiction. As the Operating Jurisdiction, Pasco shall bill each of the other
ACA cities monthly, in conjunction with the billing for the monthly animal control
contractor payments, 1/36 of the annual compensation as listed in Exhibit"A".
4. Legal Expenses. Legal services expense shall be shared equally between ACA member
cities. Legal services, except for counsel regarding day-to-day administrative and operational
issues, must be pre-approved by the ACA. Pasco shall provide the ACA cities with quarterly
reports and invoices for such expenses.
I
Page 154 of 306
S.Term. This Agreement shall be effective for a term commencing on January 1, 2007
and expiring on December 31, 2012. Provided however, this agreement shall be automatically
renewed annually thereafter unless any of the Cities gives notice of its intent to terminate its
participation in the Interlocal Agreement or if either party provides notice of its intent to
terminate this agreement. Such notice shall be written and provided at least twelve months
prior to the designated date of withdrawal or termination.
ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY CITY OF PASCO
CITY OF KENNEWICK
aj-ke4m
Robert R. Hammond, City Manager Gary/C field, City lanager
Attest:
Valerie J. Lof , City Cl
Approved as to form:
qq
John S. Ziobro, City Attorney
CITY O PASCO
Joyc lso ayor
Atte
Debra L.T1 ark, City Cler
Appro ed as Form:
Leland B. Kerr, Attorney
CI Y O RI L ND
JJ hn C. Darringto it Manager
st:
Cy is Johns , City Clerk
Approv d as to Form:
dr
Thomas O. Lampson,tity Alfforney
Page 155 of 306
Exhibit "A"
Operating Jurisdiction Compensation
2007)
Compensation
Hrs/Yr Rate Cost
Administrative Oversight 96 70) $6,720
Contract Administration, Record Keeping 208 35) $7,280
Accounting/Billing 2,000
Total Annual Compensation 16,000
Page 156 of 306
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 5, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/9/24
FROM: Maria Serra, Public Works Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution - I-182 & Broadmoor Boulevard Interchange Project Change
Order No. 7 (5 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
Exhibit A - Change Order No. 7
Power Point Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Awarded Construction Contract Amount = $6,691,534.74
Change Order No. 1 – No. 6 = $533,703.68
Change Order No. 7 = $91,428.00
New Contract Total = $7,316,666.42
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The existing freeway interchange (I/C) at Broadmoor Blvd. (Rd. 100) and I-182
serves as the areas primary access point for a large segment of the City's
population in the westerly portion of the City of Pasco (City). As development
has have I/C the on demands existing past the over occurred decade,
increased proportionately. The cumulative effects of increased commercial
development to the south of the interstate; office and commercial uses along
Sandifur and Broadmoor/Rd. of 100; development residential Blvd.; east
development of Burns Rd. between Rd. 68 and Broadmoor Blvd. have all
served to fully utilize the existing I/C.
Several collaboration improvements to the I/C were identified in with
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), Federal Highway
Page 157 of 306
Administration (FHA), the City, and local development community and on June
30 ,2023, Council adopted Resolution 4363 which awarded the construction
contract to Nelson Construction Corp., for the I-182 & Broadmoor Blvd.
Interchange. The contract’s I/C improvements include the construction of an
additional eastbound deceleration lane on I-182, a new looped off ramp for
northbound Broadmoor Blvd traffic, and a roundabout to replace the existing
signal at the eastbound on/off ramps and Broadmoor Blvd intersection.
Since the project’s initiation several change orders have been identified,
reviewed, and approved under the authority delegated to the Public Works
Director, City Manager, and City of Pasco Council. Previously approved
Change Orders (CO) No. 1 – No. 4 were approved under the authority of the
Public Works Director and City Manager. CO No. 5, approved by Council on
April 17, 2024, included the addition of steel reinforcement to Cement Concrete
Pavement, which was missed on the contract documents. CO No. 6, approved
by Council on July 08, 2024, added multiple items required to meet WSDOT
standards.
V. DISCUSSION:
CO No. 7 includes changes due to unforeseen site conditions, items missed
from the contract, and additional items place on the contract by WSDOT.
The cost of CO No. 7 in the amount of $91,428.00 exceeds the Public Works
Director delegated approval authority. Items in the change order include
additional surveying for the I-182 eastbound off-ramp, changes to grate inlets
to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirement, weed and pest
control of the site, third party damages, detectable warning surfaces for ADA
compliant curb ramps, testing of storm water sewer pipe, and additional
grading for the installation of luminaire poles.
Page 158 of 306
Resolution – I-182 & Broadmoor Interchange CO No.7 - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO.
7 WITH NELSON CONSTRUCTION CORP. FOR THE I-182 & BROADMOOR
BLVD. INTERCHANGE.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City), and Nelson Construction Corp. entered into a
Construction Contract on June 30, 2023, for construction of the I-182 & Broadmoor Blvd.
Interchange Project; and
WHEREAS, I-182 & Broadmoor Blvd. Interchange Project addressed the need for a
deceleration lane on Eastbound I-182 offramp, a new loop ramp connecting to Northbound
Broadmoor Boulevard, a roundabout at the Eastbound Terminal of Broadmoor Boulevard, active
transportation improvements, and other work; and
WHEREAS, previously approved Change Orders No. 1 – No. 4 was under the authority
provided to the Public Works Director; and
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 5 and No. 6 were both approved by City Council and
executed on April 17, 2024, and July 8, 2024, respectively; and
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 7 addresses multiple changes to the contract that were
either the result of unforeseen site conditions, modifications identified during construction, or
additional requirements placed on the contract by the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT); and
WHEREAS, the $91,428.00 amount of Change Order No. 7 added to the cumulative sum
of the previously approved Change Orders, exceeds the City Manager’s authority, and thus
determined to obtain Council Approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into Change Order No.
7 with Nelson Construction Corp.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of Change
Order No. 7 between the City of Pasco and Nelson Construction Corp. as attached hereto and
incorporated in Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Change Order No. 7 on behalf of the City of
Pasco.
Page 159 of 306
Resolution – I-182 & Broadmoor Interchange CO No.7 - 2
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 160 of 306
Project No:21-292 I-182 and Broadmoor Boulevard Interchange
Contractor:
Description of Change:
Detail as Appropriate:
Item Cost Totals
107 1,600.00$
108 5,000.00$
109 5,000.00$
110 50,000.00$
111 4,588.00$
112 13,160.00$
113 10,580.00$
114 1,500.00$
Contract Bid Amount:6,144,660.00$
SALES TAX @ 8.9%:546,874.74$
Total:6,691,534.74$
Subtotal including tax Subtotal
No tax
Total Total
Total Change Orders To Date 625,131.68$
New Contract Amount
YES NO
APPROVED:
CONTRACTOR Date Date
APPROVED:
Date Date
APPROVED:
Structural Excavation Class B Include Haul & shoring, Lump Sum
91,428.00$
APPROVED:
7,316,666.42$
IS CONTRACT TIME AFFECTED BY THIS CHANGE ORDER
Contract Time Prior to this Change Order…………………………..360
Modification to Contract Time by this Change Order………………
PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS TOTAL CURRENT CHANGE ORDER
Project Weed and Pest Control, Force Acount
Third Party Damage, Force Account
Detectable Warning Surface, 124 SF @$37.00/SF
Luminaire Pole Grading Costs, Lum Sum
CITY OF PASCO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 7
Project Title:
Nelson Construction Corp.
Items not included in the original contract, or modifications identified during construction.
This C. O. adds the following items. Payment method for each new item will be as listed. For details of each
item see page two of this document. The following items are required for the project's success and by
WSDOT.
PROJECT MANAGER
APPROVED:
Revised Total Contract Time…………………………………………360
It is mutually agreed by both parties that this Change Order fully describes the change(s) that is (are) being made and that the compensation
for this Change Order is full and complete and is the only compensation due or owing for this Change Order. Further, it is mutually agreed
that this document will supplement the present Contract Documents and that the provisions of the previously executed Contract Documents
shall apply to this Change Order.
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:
Additional Surveying/partnering, lump sum
Description and Payment Method
Bridge inlet grate type change out 4 each, Lump Sum
Testing Storm Sewer Pipe,Lump Sum
0
533,703.68$ 91,428.00$
533,703.68$
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DEPUTY PW DIRECTOR-ENGINEERING
Page 1 of 2Page 161 of 306
Date Date
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
Additional surveying for deceleration ramp east bound/partnering, lump sum
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER
In Change order #6 the cost of surveying for the correction of the grades and concrete widths on the EB off ramp deleration taper was not
included in the lump sum amount. This lunp sum amount was negotiated as a partnering opportunity.
Bridge inlet grate type change out 4 each, Lump sum
Grate tops on inlets located at the four corners of the overcrossing bridge are not ADA compliant. This change order replaces existing
welded covers with duel vaned Grates and frames. All work will be in accordance with the contract documants. A lump sum payment will
be made for the installation of 4 vaned grates and frames.
Project weed and pest control, Force Acount
Wsdot requires weeding and pest control be accomplished prior to seeding and mulchimg of areas to be seeded. This item accommodates
that requirement. All work will be in accordance with the contract documents.
Third Party Damage, Force Account
WSDOT specifications require an item to pay for damage caused by third parties. This item accommodates that requirement. Information
for this item is contained in the contract documents.
Contract Plans Set Resolutions, Lump Sum
WSDOT Specifications required an item to pay for excavating and shoring for the placement of storm sewer pipe. This Lump Sum amount is
to compensate the contractor for the Structure excavation and for shoring of the storm sewers trenches. All work is to be in accordance
with the contract documents. A lump sum payment will be made for all storm sewer sytem excavation and shoring of trenches associated
with CB1 - CB6 and the culvert in the origninal bid contract documents.
Detectable Warning Surface, Square Foot
WSDOT specifications pays for Detectable Warning Surface (DWS) separatly when placed in a sidewalk that is not part of an ADA ramp.
There are multiple locations on the project with this situation. This item accommodates that requirement. All work for this item will be in
accordance with the contract documents..
Testing Storm Sewer Pipe,Lump Sum
WSDOT Specifications require storm sewer pipe be tested. This item accommodates that requirement. All work will be in accordance with
the 2023 WSDOT standard specifications, considered part of this contract. Paymant will be a lump sum amount for up to 1060 LF of storm
sewer pipe. A lump sum payment will be made for the testing of all storm sewer pipes installed on the project.
Luminaire Pole Grading Costs, Lump Sum
The plans were ambiguous as to the need for the embankment around the luminaire poles . WSDOT required this embankment to create a
safe break away base. Material was paid through existing items however added labor and equipment was requied to place this material
after the inital embankment was built. This item compensates the contractor for that added cost.
Page 2 of 2Page 162 of 306
Change Order No. 7 Approval –
Multiple Misc. Contract Changes
Pa
g
e
1
6
3
o
f
3
0
6
I-182 & Broadmoor Blvd.
Interchange Overview
Approximately 80% complete as of August 2024.
Project is currently scheduled for completion December 2024.
Summary of Project Construction Costs
o Construction Contract Award w/Nelson Construction, Corp. (June 2023) = $6,691,534.74
o Change Order No. 1 – No.6 (Previously Approved) = $533,703.68
o Change Order No. 7 (Council Approval) = $91,428.00
o New Total (All Changes) = $7,316,666.42 MS0
Pa
g
e
1
6
4
o
f
3
0
6
PWRF
Improvements
Phase 3
I-182 & Broadmoor Blvd.
Interchange Project
Pa
g
e
1
6
5
o
f
3
0
6
Proposed Change Order N0. 7
The following contract changes are needed to address unforeseen site conditions, items
missed from the original contract, and additional requirements placed by Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT).
1. Additional Surveying
2. Bridge Inlet Grates
3. Weed and Pest Control
4. Third Party Damages
5. Detectable Warning Surface
6. Structural Excavation
7. Storm Sewer Testing
8. Luminaire Pole Grading
Pa
g
e
1
6
6
o
f
3
0
6
Questions?
Pa
g
e
1
6
7
o
f
3
0
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 16, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/9/24
FROM: Maria Serra, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution - Change Order No. 5 for Pasco Water Reuse Facility Phase
2 Construction Contract with Tapani, Inc. (5 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
Exhibit A – Change Order No. 5
Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Engineer's Construction Estimate $45,488,837.00
Awarded Construction Contract Amount $31,588,246.92
Previously Approved Change Orders No. 1-4 $728,022.52
Proposed Change Order No. 5 $171,616.26
New Contract Total $32,487,885.70
The proposed change order can be accommodated within the project budget.
The project is funded through a State Revolving Fund (SRF) low interest loan
awarded by Washington State Department of Ecology under agreement WQC-
2024-Pasco-00091, which was authorized through adoption of Resolution No.
4425 on March 4, 2024. Total contract changes including proposed Change
Order No. 5 represent approximately 2.85% of the original awarded construction
contract amount.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The construction project for the project was awarded to Tapani, Inc. on
September 11, 2023. The project is currently 79% complete, with an
Page 168 of 306
anticipated construction completion in March 2025.
Since construction began four (4) Change Orders (CO) have been approved as
follows:
Previously approved CO No. 1 provided for the construction and installation of
twenty-one (21) artificial owl burrows to comply with federal funding and
environmental mitigation requirements. CO No. 1 was fully executed on March
13, 2024, under the authority delegated to the Public Works Director.
Council approved Resolution No. 4433 on March 18, 2024, authorized the City
Manager to execute CO No. 2 with Tapani, Inc. on behalf of the City. CO No. 2
addressed construction material substitutions and structural modifications
needed for fully functional installation of approved system components as well
as maintaining compliance with federal funding and regulatory requirements.
Council approved Resolution No. 4441 on April 15, 2024, authorized the City
Manager to execute CO No. 3 with Tapani, Inc. on behalf of the City. CO No. 3
addressed new piping and existing facility infrastructure modifications needed
to maintain fully functioning process water customer connections and tie-ins.
Previously approved CO No. 4 mainly addressed installation of below-grade
polyethylene encasement for the new lagoon concrete outlet structures. The
encasement provides an effective barrier for electrical isolation between the
structures and native soils when performing the lagoon liner electronic leak
detection regulatory with accordance in five (5) every testing years
requirements. CO No. 4 was fully executed on May 2, 2024, under the authority
delegated to the Public Works Director and City Manager.
V. DISCUSSION:
Change Proposal Requests (CPRs) were identified, reviewed, and packaged
for approval into proposed CO No. 5 and are outlined as follows:
1. 16" and piping overflow the for scope Additional abandoning
appurtenances within the interior of the existing 123 million gallon (MG)
lagoon is needed for a complete and functioning installation of the
connections between new and existing winter storage lagoons. The
design demolition plan only indicated abandonment of overflow pipes
along the 123 MG lagoon perimeter.
2. Structural modifications to each new winter storage lagoon are needed
to install reinforced concrete apron slabs at each lagoon inlet pipe
location pipe and slabs apron inlet of Construction total). (11 the
soil erosion mitigates in anchoring liner associated systems these
locations where larger diameter pipes are installed within the sloped
Page 169 of 306
earthen embankment walls.
3. Additional supply of twenty (20) gate remotes compatible with the new
automated slide gate access system. The design specifications included
manual access keypads without other means of gate access.
4. Existing water level controls and instrumentation in the Irrigation Pump
Station (IPS) flow splitter box needs to be relocated to the wet well side
of the structure, which was identified through the Request for
Information (RFI) process.
These itemized changes will constitute a fifth change order to the project in the
amount of $171,616.26 with an increase of 10 working days added to the
original contract time.
Staff recommends approval of CO No. 5 in the amount of $171,616.26 for the
PWRF - Phase 2 Winter Storage Pond project.
Page 170 of 306
Resolution - CO No. 5 for PWRF Phase 2 - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO.
5 WITH TAPANI, INC. FOR THE PROCESS WATER REUSE FACILITY
PHASE 2 WINTER STORAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) and Tapani, Inc. entered into a Construction Contract
on September 11, 2023, for construction of the Process Water Reuse Facility (PWRF) Phase 2
Winter Storage Pond Improvements; and
WHEREAS, previously approved Change Order No. 1 was under the authority provided
to the Public Works Director; and
WHEREAS, previously approved Change Order No. 2 was under the authority provided
to the City Manager via Council adoption of Resolution No. 4433 on March 18, 2024; and
WHEREAS, previously approved Change Order No. 3 was under the authority provided
to the City Manager via Council adoption of Resolution No. 4441 on April 15, 2024; and
WHEREAS, previously approved Change Order No. 4 was under the authority provided
to the City Manager and Public Works Director; and
WHEREAS, proposed Change Order No. 5 is issued to address piping and structural
modifications required to extend operational service life of the new winter storage lagoon system
in addition to minor electrical modifications to support proper function of site access gates and
process water level measurement telemetry devices; and
WHEREAS, the $171,616.26 amount of Change Order No. 5 added to the cumulative sum
of previously approved Change Orders, exceeds the City Manager’s authority, and thus determined
to obtain Council approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into Change
Order No. 5 with Tapani, Inc.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of Change
Order No. 5 between the City of Pasco and Tapani, Inc. as attached hereto and incorporated herein
as Exhibit A.
Page 171 of 306
Resolution - CO No. 5 for PWRF Phase 2 - 2
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Change Order No. 5 on behalf of the City of
Pasco.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 172 of 306
8/5/2024
Page 173 of 306
Page 174 of 306
Page 175 of 306
Page 176 of 306
Page 177 of 306
Page 178 of 306
Page 179 of 306
Page 180 of 306
Page 181 of 306
Page 182 of 306
Page 183 of 306
Page 184 of 306
Page 185 of 306
Page 186 of 306
Page 187 of 306
Page 188 of 306
Page 189 of 306
Page 190 of 306
Page 191 of 306
Page 192 of 306
Page 193 of 306
Page 194 of 306
Page 195 of 306
Page 196 of 306
Page 197 of 306
Page 198 of 306
Pasco City Council
Workshop Meeting
September 9, 2024
Pa
g
e
1
9
9
o
f
3
0
6
PWRF
Improvements
Phase 3
PWRF Phase 2 Project Update
106 MG COW Water Lagoon
Existing 123 MG Lagoon
103 MG Lagoon
120 MG Lagoon
Existing 35 MG Lagoon
Pa
g
e
2
0
0
o
f
3
0
6
PWRF Phase 2 Project Update
Approximately 79% complete as of August 2024.
Lagoon outlet structures complete with exception
of pedestrian bridge and slipmeter installations.
Darigold 106 MG lagoon liner system installation
currently complete.
103 MG, 106 MG, and 120 MG lagoon liner
installations and leak testing completion by October
2024.
Pa
g
e
2
0
1
o
f
3
0
6
PWRF Phase 2 Construction Costs
CostContract
$31,588,247Construction Contract w/Tapani
$31,529Change Order No. 1 (PW Director)
$250,835Change Order No. 2 (Res. No. 4433)
$264,489Change Order No. 3 (Res. No. 4441)
$181,171Change Order No. 4 (City Manager)
$171,616Change Order No. 5 (Proposed)*
$32,487,886Total Project Cost
*No impact to total project budget and fully funded through Ecology Construction Loan
Pa
g
e
2
0
2
o
f
3
0
6
Proposed Change Order N0. 5
oCPR 16 - Additional scope
for abandoning overflow
piping within the existing 123
MG lagoon (Add of $30.4k).
oCPR 17 - Installation of 11
reinforced concrete aprons
around new lagoon inlet
pipes to mitigate slope
erosion (Add of $124k).
CPR 17 – Inlet Pipe Apron Slab Installation
Pa
g
e
2
0
3
o
f
3
0
6
Proposed Change Order N0. 5
oCPR 18 - Purchase of 20 gate
remotes to supplement operation
of access gate keypads included in
design. (Add of $1.8k).
oCPR 19 - Relocation of IPS Splitter
Box instrumentation to ensure
proper function of process water
level measurement (Add of $2.5k).
CPR 19 – Location of
IPS Splitter Box
Pa
g
e
2
0
4
o
f
3
0
6
Questions?
Pa
g
e
2
0
5
o
f
3
0
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 4, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/9/24
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan Presentation (5 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Presentation Slides
Draft 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan
Community Input
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Planning Purposes Only
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a strategic blueprint outlining planned
capital expenditures over a multi-year period, typically five to ten years. It
focuses on major infrastructure projects such as constructing and maintaining
public buildings, parks, streets, and water/sewer systems. The CIP helps the
City of Pasco (City) manage and prioritize these projects, ensuring that critical
infrastructure is developed and maintained in a systematic, fiscally responsible
manner.
The CIP identifies the capital projects expected to be undertaken each year
and cost provides CIP the While the of methods proposed financing.
projections for projects, it differs from the capital budget within the biennial
budget in several ways:
Projects slated for early completion in the CIP may be funded with
reasonably available resources.
Page 206 of 306
Inclusion in the CIP signals to funding agencies the City’s commitment
to completing a project, even if it is not feasible to fund it within the
current biennial budget.
Execution of future CIP projects may depend on grants, bonds, or loans,
which could require rate adjustments or other factors outlined in the
plan. Approval of the CIP does not obligate the City Council to future
actions.
Cost projections for projects in later years may be revised as staff
refines the scope of work.
In summary, most capital projects proposed during the biennium budget
process come from the CIP, but not all CIP projects are included in the adopted
budget, and budgeted amounts may vary for various reasons.
V. DISCUSSION:
The initial projects list for the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) was
presented to City Council on August 12, 2024. Staff completed three outreach
events (two in-person, one virtual) to educate and receive feedback from the
community on the purpose of the CIP, highlight near term high-priority projects,
and engage with the community on additional projects. During these events,
staff answer to members community several connect to able were with
questions, explain projects, and provide information on how projects are
identified. In addition, councilmembers had the opportunity to tour high-priority
projects. Comments received during these events are included in this packet.
Tonight, staff presents the draft 2025-2030 CIP, which includes an interactive
projects map. The CIP includes 135 projects, as proposed the CIP totals
$534.5 million.
Draft 2025-2030 CIP
Projects Map
The proposed CIP, except where design is complete, reflects planning level
cost estimates, is information more change design with can as which
discovered in the design process. Also, as a part of the CIP, completed
projects new account to for current removed, were projects updated
information, and newly identified projects added. As mentioned previously, the
adoption of the 2025-2030 CIP does not equate to an appropriation of funds.
The 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes substantial
investments in public works infrastructure, with projects prioritized based on
anticipated revenue from system users (ratepayers) and secured funding
through grants and low-interest loans. These investments focus on upgrading
aging infrastructure while balancing the need for system expansion. As a
Page 207 of 306
result, discussions about future utility rates are necessary. Currently, the rate
model projects a 9% annual increase for Sewer services over three years
starting annual an require will 8-10% Water Likewise, 2027. in services
increase to support the proposed plan. These adjustments exceed the typical
3-4% by inflation-related increases and will require thorough review the
Council.
In addition, projects such as the Police Headquarters Expansion, West Side
Community Center, and Community Park lack dedicated funding, which will
need to be obtained through grants or other partnerships. The Council's
guidance during goal-setting and throughout the year helps staff prioritize
resources for these important projects, even though not all can be fully funded.
In conclusion, staff views these projects as crucial to maintaining the current
system and supporting future growth. We will rely on the Council for policy
guidance to balance system needs with available resources.
Butterfield Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Improvements (All Phases)
The phased replacement of the Butterfield WTP is a substantial
undertaking that will require both time and considerable financial
resources. As one of the City’s critical infrastructure projects, these
improvements are essential for ensuring the long-term reliability and
capacity of the water treatment system.
Rivershore Sewer Trunk Line Replacement
This project has recently secured funding for its design phase through the
Department of replacement the the Once Ecology. of completed,
Rivershore Sewer Trunk Line will significantly improve the City’s sewer
infrastructure, addressing current capacity and maintenance issues.
Road 76 Overpass
The Road 76 Overpass project is part of the City’s ongoing efforts to
enhance traffic flow and improve transportation infrastructure. This project
is in the early planning stages, with further updates expected as design
and funding progress.
Sylvester Street Pedestrian/Bike Overpass
The Sylvester Street Pedestrian and Bike Overpass is fully funded and
currently in the beginning stages of design. This overpass will provide a
much-needed connection for non-motorized transportation, improving
safety and accessibility for pedestrians and cyclists.
Water Conservation
The City is taking significant steps to improve water conservation through
the expansion of irrigation systems, incorporating xeriscaping and the
Page 208 of 306
installation of irrigation timers to promote efficient water use.
Thunderbird Parking Lot
Improvements to the Thunderbird Parking Lot are planned to address
capacity and maintenance needs. These upgrades will enhance both
functionality and aesthetics, ensuring the parking lot meets current
demands.
Staff seeks discussion and direction to bring the 2025-2030 CIP for adoption by
resolution during an upcoming regular meeting.
Page 209 of 306
Comment cards from Open House sessions
1. "Please Consider Highway access at 48+ Argent. We need more access. Could use the
existing underpass" (Pete)
2. "I am the new Grant Navigator w/Benton-Franklin Council of Government. I would love to
find time to meet & learn more & how I can be helpful in finding/securing funding." (Kristin
Eby)
Page 210 of 306
From:Maria Serra
To:Angela Pashon; Alyssa Warner
Cc:Debby Barham
Subject:FW: Online Form Submittal: Contact the Public Works Director
Date:Friday, September 6, 2024 10:07:12 AM
Attachments:image001.png
This is another comment related to CIP and my response.
I am hoping we can compile these as attachments for the Council packet when CIP is presented
again.
Maria
Maria Laura Serra, PE
Public Works Director
525 North Third Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
(509) 544-4125
serram@pasco-wa.gov
This email and your response are considered a public record and will be subject to disclosure under Washington’s Public Records Disclosure Act
From: Maria Serra
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2024 10:04 AM
To: quintonstevens@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Contact the Public Works Director
Mr. Stevens,
Thank you for your email and for reaching out with your thoughts!
Intersection improvement projects are typically based on traffic analysis recommendations, which
look at both short- and long-term performance. We consider factors such as traffic volumes
(motorized and non-motorized), crash data, lifecycle costs (initial capital investment and Operations
and maintenance cost for the life of the asset, and any other project constraints like available right-
of-way, existing utility corridors, etc. The goal is to find solutions that balance costs and constraints
while ensuring safety and efficiency.
You're absolutely right. There are currently two major projects involving roundabouts, and several
future improvements have been proposed as signals in the Capital Improvement Plan. The Plan is
vastly based on the recommendations of the Transportation System Masterplan (TSMP).
While the Transportation System Master Plan (TSMP) identifies signals in certain locations, it serves
as a high-level planning document with a 20-year horizon. It highlights future roadway needs and
proposed improvements but leaves detailed analysis to be done when each project moves forward.
We do review and verify proposed solutions during the pre-design phase of a project. At that stage,
we update traffic data and reassess known constraints to ensure the selected option is still the best
fit.
Your comments are being incorporated in the feedback for CIP (from this email). I will ensure this
and other feedback received is included in the packet for Council consideration.
If you want to share additional thoughts, in the future, you are always welcome to participate in the
public comment section of council meetings as well as take part in listening sessions or open houses
Page 211 of 306
for specific projects of interest. The city’s website, and social media channels often post
opportunities for comments and involvement (via online survey or events).
Thank you again for your input, and please feel free to reach out with any further questions or
comments!
Maria Laura Serra, PE
Public Works Director
525 North Third Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
serram@pasco-wa.gov
This email and your response are considered a public record and will be subject to disclosure under Washington’s Public Records Disclosure Act
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Pasco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless
you are sure the content is safe.]
Contact the Public Works Director
To contact the Public Works Director, please complete the form below and
click Submit.
If you have a service request, please use the AskPasco app.
Name:Quinton Stevens
Email:quintonstevens@gmail.com
Subject:Roundabouts vs Signalized Intersections
Comment:Hello, I wanted to ask about decision-making regarding
intersection improvements, why it seems we choose to go for the
more expensive option that requires more operations and
maintenance (the signalized intersection) vs implementing more
roundabouts instead (can operate for ages without power or
maintenance, improves safety due to physical barrier)? I've seen
many plans in the CIP for improving intersections by putting
signalized intersections in places where a roundabout would
make significantly more sense for safety and traffic flow, at least
at a glance.
I'd like to advocate for the use of more roundabouts in our city's
planning, in lieu of 4-way stops and 4-way signalized
intersections. Please let me know where I can go or what I can
do to promote this in our city's planning.
Page 212 of 306
I am very pleased to see the roundabout project on the i-182 /
Broadmoor interchange, as well as the Road 68 / Court street
intersection (though this one seems potentially oversized).
Thank you.
Please note:
Your e-mail and any e-mail response from the City may be a public record
under RCW 42.56 and subject to inspection and copying by the public upon
request. Accordingly, there can be no expectation of privacy.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
Page 213 of 306
From:Maria Serra
To:Angela Pashon; Jesse Rice; Alyssa Warner
Cc:Debby Barham
Subject:FW: Online Form Submittal: Contact the Public Works Director
Date:Friday, September 6, 2024 9:34:49 AM
Attachments:image001.png
All,
Sharing below some feedback on CIP.
I sent an email acknowledging receipt but will follow up with responses to his inquiries.
Maria
Maria Laura Serra, PE
Public Works Director
525 North Third Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
(509) 544-4125
serram@pasco-wa.gov
This email and your response are considered a public record and will be subject to disclosure under Washington’s Public Records Disclosure Act
From: noreply@civicplus.com <noreply@civicplus.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2024 4:48 PM
To: Maria Serra <serram@pasco-wa.gov>; Janette Romero <romeroj1@pasco-wa.gov>
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Contact the Public Works Director
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Pasco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless
you are sure the content is safe.]
Contact the Public Works Director
To contact the Public Works Director, please complete the form below and
click Submit.
If you have a service request, please use the AskPasco app.
Name:Joe Pryce
Email:jpryce4617@hotmail.com
Subject:5 YR CIP Budget
Comment:Maria, unfortunately I was unable to attend the forums regarding
Page 214 of 306
the above. Hopefully, your the one I can forward my input to or at
least direct me to the proper department or individual. I was
hoping to see more of a robust plan for rivershore development,
in particular Chiawana Park and between the cable bridge and
train Bridge. Although there is budget items for the levee
between rd 52 and 72 for lowering, plus improvements at train
Bridge, the levee needs attention as soon as possible. It is very
narrow and parts of path are. Rumbling off making it more narrow
and potential for serious injuries should a pedestrian fall onto the
rocks. I'm sure this is in cooperation with the Corps of Engineers.
With all the current anti ipated in Road 100 and Broadmoor area,
Chiawana Park could be utilized much like Howard Amon Park
with significant expansion and improvements in particular the
vacant area between the opposite ends of Park. Also, is there
any further discussion about a public dock for fishing/recreation
by the cable Bridge? One other point I wanted to bring up is the
road 76 overpass. Has there been any thought for an overpass
on road 36? This to me makes more sense as to funnel traffic
from Desert Plateau area to Court Street and 20th avenue
businness corridor to alleviate traffic on Road 68. The Road 76
overpass may compromise more traffic on Road 68. Thanks for
your time, I appreciate iate it.
Please note:
Your e-mail and any e-mail response from the City may be a public record
under RCW 42.56 and subject to inspection and copying by the public upon
request. Accordingly, there can be no expectation of privacy.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
Page 215 of 306
City of Pasco
Capital Improvement Plan
Draft Version 9/06/2024
Last updated 09/06/24
-
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 1Page 216 of 306
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction 3
Welcome 4
Fund Structure 5
Financial Policies 6
Budget Overview 10
Debts and Reserves 11
Capital Improvements 13
Map of proposed projects 14
One-year plan 15
2025-2030 Plan 21
Appendix 39
Glossary 40
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 2Page 217 of 306
INTRODUCTION
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 3Page 218 of 306
City of Pasco 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan
Honorable Mayor and City Council, Pasco residents, business owners/operators, and
interested parties:
As proposed the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) presents the plan for how
major public facility improvements will be implemented over the next six years. As policy
makers and professionals, Council and staff have a responsibility to plan. Projects in this
document invest in the future of our community and are planned to help guide the City
for the next 20 years and promote adopted City Council goals.
The City provides for scal sustainability and economic vitality of our community through
thoughtful, well-prioritized and leveraged investment – using that farther look out to shape
near-term decisions.
A CIP is subject to considerable change and should not be considered as an allocation or
appropriation of funding. This document provides project overviews, expense summaries,
and revenue sources.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY
There are many sources that fund CIP Projects including: grants, loans, utility charges,
bonded indebtedness, and taxes. These funding sources contribute to the design and
construction of projects.
The major categories of projects include:
General: Public safety and city buildings
Parks & Recreation: New parks, pools, trails, and sporting facilities
Transportation: Road widening, replacements and traf c signal improvements
Utilities: Sewer, stormwater, water, and wastewater expansions and improvements
A project listed in the CIP provides potential funders with greater assurance their
investment received adequate review and planning. Projects included in this plan with
funding listed in later years may not seem adequate; the inclusion of such projects provides
further opportunity for the City to seek additional funding to advance projects.
The investment this plan supports adopted City Council goals, outlines promotes our local
economy, provides a roadmap, and enables the City to meet requirements to qualify for
participation of most grant and loan programs. This plan focuses on advancing City Council
Goals and addressing the needs of current and future needs of our growing community.
Much of the work included won’t be seen by users however, the CIP facilitates the lives of
our residents and the vitality of our businesses by helping to create an environment where
they have more time to focus on what is important to them.
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 4Page 219 of 306
Fund structure
The City is nancially organized into separate scal and accounting entities known as Funds. Each Fund is a separate division
for accounting and budgetary purposes. The Fund Accounting Process allows the City to budget and account for revenues that
are restricted by law or policy for a speci c use or purpose in accordance with nationally recognized rules of governmental
accounting and budgeting.
The City of Pasco budgets and accounts for approximately 39 separate Funds. Each Fund can be viewed as a separate checking
account to be used for a speci c purpose. All funds of the City fall into one of the following major categories: General Fund,
Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds, Capital Projects Funds, Proprietary Funds, Internal Service Funds and Fiduciary
Funds. Following is a brief description of these categories.
General Fund: The General Fund nances most traditional services that the public associates with the City. This includes law
enforcement, re protection, municipal court, parks and recreation, community development and administrative activities. The
General Fund is, essentially, a “catch-all” fund for accounting for City operations that are not required to be accounted for in a
separate fund. The General Fund receives all of the Property Taxes, except those that are voter approved for the repayment of
debt. This is a major fund and must have an appropriated budget.
Special Revenue Funds: The City uses Special Revenue Funds to account for revenues that must be used by law for speci c
purposes. Examples are the City Street Fund and Arterial Street Fund, which account for Gasoline Taxes received, and can only
be used for maintenance and improvements to roads and Streets. The City does not have any Special Revenue Funds classi ed
or presented as major funds for nancial reporting purposes. All Special Revenue Funds have appropriated budgets.
Debt Service Funds: The Debt Service Funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for the repayment of
monies borrowed through voter approved general obligation bond sales and the related interest. This fund is not classi ed or
presented as a major fund for nancial reporting purposes. This fund does not require legal appropriation, since the
authorization of general obligation debt includes the amortization schedule, which serves as a budget for the life of the debt.
Capital Improvements Fund: This Fund accounts for nancial resources that are restricted, committed or assigned to
expenditures for the acquisition and construction of major capital facilities. Most capital projects are accounted for in this fund.
Capital projects related to Enterprise Funds are accounted for within the Enterprise Funds. The City’s Capital Projects Fund is
known as the Construction Fund and is presented as a major fund for nancial reporting purposes. This fund has an
appropriated budget for the biennium.
Internal Service Funds: Internal Service Funds are used by the City to account for the nancing of goods and/or services
provided by one department or fund to another department or fund of the City on a cost reimbursement basis. For example,
the City uses the Equipment Rental (ER) Funds to purchase and maintain vehicles used by the various departments and funds.
Each department or fund pays rent to the ER Fund to use that equipment. The City does not have any Internal Service Funds
classi ed or presented as major funds for nancial reporting purposes. These funds are not subject to budget appropriations.
Fiduciary/Trust Funds: These funds are also referred to as Trust or Custodial Funds and are used to account for assets held by
the City on behalf of outside parties, including other governments, or other funds within the City. For example, the Cemetery
Trust Fund holds a portion of the proceeds from the sale of gravesites in order to provide ongoing grounds maintenance and
care of the facility. The City does not have any Fiduciary Funds classi ed or presented as major funds for nancial reporting
purposes. These funds are not subject to budget appropriations.
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 5Page 220 of 306
Financial Policies
The stewardship of public funds is one of the greatest responsibilities given to the of cials and managers of the City of Pasco.
Therefore, the establishment and implementation of sound nancial policies enables the City to protect public interest,
maintain public trust and guide the City to meet their objectives. These policies are designed with a long-term approach to
achieve nancial stability and economic growth. These policies are intended to be applied over periods extending well beyond
the current budget period. Long-term stability and growth cannot be accomplished if we allow long-term de cits or choose to
support on-going needs through one-time revenues. Financial best practices and scal prudence must dictate the City’s
nancial operations and procedures, as well as guide the City to meet its immediate and long-term objectives.
Core Values and Goals
Financial Stability – The City will create nancial stability to provide residents with consistent and adequate levels of public
services. The City of Pasco is accountable to its citizens for the use of public dollars. All activities supported by the City must
function within the limits of its nancial resources. With a long-term nancial approach in mind, the City will develop and
maintain long-term plans, carefully weigh the costs and bene ts of development opportunities and adhere to sound debt,
reserve and investment policies. Some of the long-term plans in progress or that will be started include the Police and Fire
Strategic Plans, Cost Allocation Plan, Comprehensive Economic Plan, Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Downtown Master
Plan, and the Land Use Comprehensive Plan.
Accountability and Financial Planning – The City will institute nancial planning that ensures City services are provided at the
best value and that services are in alignment with the needs and wants of the community.
Environmental and Economic Vitality – The City’s nancial strategy will support continued investment in the renovation and
maintenance of infrastructure, facilities, policies and programs that support a clean and healthy natural environment. The City
will strive to provide effective and ef cient services to ensure a safe and healthy atmosphere for its residents, businesses, and
visitors, while preserving and enhancing its unique cultural and environmental attributes.
Transparency and Engagement – The City will be accountable for producing value for the community by providing planning
and report mechanisms that make it clear how the City plans to use its resources to achieve the community vision. The City is
committed to engaging its citizens as a partner in formulating plans and delivering services.
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 6Page 221 of 306
Planning and Budgeting
Biennial Budget – The budget is a performance, nancing and spending plan agreed to by the Council, City Manager and
Department Directors. It contains information and data regarding expected revenues, expected expenditures and anticipated
capital projects. The budget is developed using a performance-based, results-oriented approach that incorporates line items,
programs and the priorities of the City. The City de nes a balanced budget as current biennium revenues (including fund
balances) equal to or greater than current biennium budgeted expenditures. A scally sound budget will include the following
aspects:
Budget adoption by the Council will be at the fund level. Any changes in appropriations at the fund level will require City
Council approval in the form of a scheduled budget amendment.
Position budgeting will be used as a tool for Council consideration. This will list the actual and proposed full time
equivalent (FTE) allocation on a department and fund basis.
Department and Fund budgets will include overhead and full cost allocation activity.
Reports on revenues and expenditures will be prepared at least quarterly for the General Fund and made available to the
Council. Staff will also make available to Council revenue and expenditure reports on a quarterly basis for all major funds.
Biennial budgets should provide for design, construction, maintenance and replacement of the City’s capital, plant, and
equipment consistent with the Capital Improvement Plan.
The City will develop an analysis of equipment replacement and maintenance needs. This analysis will be to more
accurately project the life cycle of the equipment and will attempt to update the results consistent with the budget
development process.
Interfund transfers and/or loans will be completed only after Council approval or inclusion in the adopted budget or
subsequent amendment.
Recurring operating expenditures will be funded by recurring operating revenues. One-time revenues will not be used to
support on-going needs, unless otherwise budgeted or approved by Council.
City-operated utilities should show positive net operating results, unless otherwise budgeted or approved by Council.
Reserve Policies and Goals – Financial best practices dictate that the City should have a reasonable amount of resources in
reserve to address unanticipated declines in revenue. Adequate reserve levels are a necessary component of the City’s overall
nancial management strategy and a key factor in external agencies’ measurement of the City’s nancial strength. In general,
the City shall support ongoing operations with ongoing revenues, but may use reserves on a one-time basis to support City
services pending the development a longer-term nancial solution. Reserves help mitigate the effects of an economic
downturn or other unanticipated events on revenue growth.
Provide suf cient cash ow to meet daily nancial needs.
All expenditures drawn from reserve accounts shall require prior Council approval unless previously authorized by the City
Council for expenditures within the City’s annual budget.
If reserves fall below required levels as set by this policy, the City must include within its annual budget a plan to restore
reserves to the required levels.
General Fund: Reserves should be maintained to at least 60 days of average operating expenditures, unless otherwise
adopted in the budget or otherwise approved by Council.
The City will review annually the reserve level required to meet cash ow needs.
Utility Fund and non-major Enterprise funds: Reserves should be maintained at 45 days of operating expenditures, unless
otherwise adopted in the budget.
Debt Service Fund: Reserves should be maintained at an average of one year’s debt service payments for all debt, except
assessment debt, or all statutorily required reserve funds to guarantee debt service, whichever is more.
Medical/Dental Insurance Fund: Reserves should be maintained at an amount equal to 16 weeks of budgeted expenses.
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) – The CIP is a six-year plan for capital and major improvements that support the City of
Pasco’s current and future population and economy. The City’s CIP is a long-range schedule of proposed public facilities,
infrastructure and major projects, which includes estimated costs and sources of funding over a six-year period. The CIP is
updated annually for the purpose of con rming and/or reorganizing projects on a priority basis and to prepare the Capital
Projects Budget. The Council’s adoption of the CIP in no way constitutes an appropriation of funds to a speci c project.
The City will make capital improvements in accordance with an adopted Capital Improvement Plan, as budgeted within
the current biennial budget.
The City will determine the most cost-effective nancing method for all new projects.
For each capital project and for each year of the six-year planning period, the CIP shall include an estimate of the cost of
construction, an estimate of the annual O&M impact, and anticipated sources of funding.
The CIP shall be prepared and submitted to the City Council as part the Proposed Biennial Operating Budget.
Reports on the status of projects included in the CIP shall be prepared and presented to the City Council annually.
These reports will highlight the status of project construction, scheduling, spending, funding and discuss any signi cant
issues or trends that may affect the ability of the City to stay within budget.
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 7Page 222 of 306
Equipment Replacement – The City’s physical assets, such as vehicles and buildings, represent a signi cant investment of
resources. Timely maintenance and replacement of these assets at the end of their useful lives is necessary. This
enhances reliability, quality of public services, and supports safety for the public and employees.
The City will maintain a comprehensive inventory of its physical assets, including useful life, original purchase date and
cost, information on its general condition, and the estimated value of replacement.
The City will maintain a replacement schedule by physical asset indicating the replacement cost and its corresponding
source of funding. The replacement schedule will be reviewed and budgeted as part of the City’s biennial budgeting
process.
The City will maintain its physical assets adequately to protect the City’s capital investment. Adequate maintenance will
further minimize unnecessary future repair and replacement cost.
Equipment reserve funds shall be maintained at levels suf cient to meet scheduled equipment replacement, ensure
safety and to prevent a deterioration in City assets.
Revenue Policies – Service demands require that an adequate revenue stream be maintained. A diversi ed and stable revenue
structure will be maintained to shelter the City from uctuations in any single revenue source. City funds will be prudently
invested to provide for suf cient liquidity to meet cash ow needs and provide interest earnings. The following, in conjunction
with the City’s Revenue Guide in the Appendices, will serve as guidelines for maintaining a stable revenue stream:
The City will seek to avoid dependence on temporary or unstable revenues to fund recurring/basic municipal services.
The City will proactively compete for its fair share of available State and Federal revenues. The City will diligently collect
revenue due and ensure compliance with revenue regulations.
The City will establish all user charges/fees at a level related to the cost of providing the service and within policy
parameters established by City Council.
At least every odd numbered year, the City will review user fees to assess for the effects of in ation and other factors as
appropriate. The City will set fees and user charges for Enterprise Funds at a level that fully supports the total direct and
indirect cost of the activity, including the cost of annual depreciation of capital assets.
Expenditure Policies – The City shall authorize only those ongoing operating expenditures that may be supported by ongoing
operating revenues. Before the City undertakes any agreements or purchases that would create xed or ongoing expenses, the
cost implications of such shall be analyzed and reviewed.
Emphasis shall be placed on improving productivity, workplace innovation and program evaluation, as well as alternative
means of service, rather than adding to the work force.
The City shall invest in technology and other ef ciency tools to ensure high productivity.
Enterprise Fund expenditures shall be fully supported by their own rates, fees and charges and not subsidized by the
General Fund without authorization of the City Council. The Enterprise Funds shall pay their share of overhead costs and
services provided by the General Fund.
Debt Policies – The City recognizes that prudent use of its credit can facilitate construction of essential capital improvements
and services, while sharing the costs of those improvements between current and future bene ciaries. The intent of the
Council is that the City shall manage its long-term debt in a manner designed to utilize its credit to optimize City services,
while balancing debt levels and annual debt service obligations. The following policies are intended to apply to all forms of
debt.
Short-term Debt and Internal Debt
Short-term debt is de ned as a period equal to or less than one year.
The City may use short-term debt to cover temporary cash ow shortages.
The City may issue Interfund loans (internal debt) rather than outside debt to meet short-term cash ow needs. This
includes “one-day” loans from the General Fund for year-end fund balance reporting. All Interfund loans with terms of
three months or more will be subject to Council approval by ordinance or resolution and will bear interest.
Long-term Debt
Long-term debt is de ned as a period of more than one year.
Long-term debt service payments will not exceed the expected life of a project.
The City will determine whether self-supporting bonds (such as special assessment improvement district bonds) are in
the City’s best interest when planning to incur debt to nance capital improvements.
Prior to the decision to issue general obligations debt, which is an obligation against the general taxing authority of the
City, the feasibility of alternative methods of nancing using special assessments, fees/charges and special revenue debt,
should rst be determined.
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 8Page 223 of 306
General Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting Policies – The City of Pasco recognizes the need for ensuring
accountability for the collection, management and expenditure of all public funds under its jurisdiction. Strong accounting
practices and nancial reporting is essential in ensuring compliance with governing laws, ordinances and procedures. Further,
this allows for timely and accurate reporting to City of cials, City Council and the public.
The City will establish and maintain a high standard of internal controls and accounting practices.
The accounting system will maintain records on a basis consistent with accepted standards for local government
accounting and the State of Washington Budgeting, Accounting, and Reporting Systems (BARS).
Annual nancial reports will present a summary of nancial activity by major types of funds. Such reports will be available
via the City’s website.
The annual nancial report shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and be in the form of a
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) as described by the Government Finance Of cers Association (GFOA).
A xed asset system will be maintained to identify all City assets, their location, and condition.
The City will strive to maximize the return on its investments with the primary objective of preserving capital and use
prudent investment practices as detailed in the City’s Investment Policy.
The criteria for managing the City’s investment portfolio shall be: a) to maintain liquidity to meet the City’s cash needs, b)
to minimize potential market risks, and c) to maximize investment returns.
The City will deposit all funds within 24 hours of receipt as required by the State Constitution.
The City will ensure that City records are audited annually, which will result in the issuance of a nancial opinion. The results of
such audit are to be available to the public via the City’s website.
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 9Page 224 of 306
BUDGET OVERVIEW
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 10Page 225 of 306
How debts are incurred
Cities use various type of nancing tools to pay for large infrastructure projects like water and sewer systems, re and police
stations, parks, etc. Much like a private citizen, the City has a credit rating that indicates its ability to pay back the borrowed
funds. Existing debt levels and future needs, as well as statutory limits on borrowing (see Debt Capacity section), dictate the
City’s ability to issue new debt.
Below are some of the major nancing tools available to the City to fund large infrastructure projects:
Bonds: The City Council may authorize the City Manager to sell bonds to raise revenue for capital improvements. Those bonds
are sold on the open market in exchange for cash payments, essentially functioning as a loan for the City. In selling and
managing bonds, the City seeks the advice of both a bond counsel and an outside nancial advisor. Interest rates on bond
payments are based on market conditions and the City’s bond rating. Private rating agencies set the City’s credit rating. The
City’s current bond rating for General Obligation is AA2, based on the ratings issued by Moody's Rating in July 2024 and AA1 for
Revenue Bonds based on rating issued by Moody's Rating in February 2024.
Unlimited Tax General Obligation (UTGO) Bonds: One of the most common methods of nancing capital improvements for
local governments is through the issuance of municipal bonds known as “Unlimited Tax General Obligation Bonds” or “UTGO
Bonds.” The voters within the local government must approve UTGO Bonds. UTGO Bonds are secured by and payable out of
annual property taxes, above and beyond general property taxes, unlimited as to rate or amount. In other words, a local
government is obligated to levy excess property taxes at whatever rate is necessary to repay the UTGO Bonds. Further, UTGO
Bonds constitute a general obligation of the local government, and, as such, the full faith, credit and resources of the local
government are pledged for their repayment.
The approval process requires local government voters to approve the bond ballot proposition at a properly conducted
election. UTGO Bonds must be approved by 60% of the quali ed voters within the local government. In addition, the total
number of voters casting ballots at the election cannot be less than 40% of the number of votes cast in the last state general
election. Further, a local government may only place a bond ballot proposition before its voters twice in any calendar year.
Voted indebtedness for cities may not exceed 2.5% of Assessed Value (AV) for general municipal purposes (any outstanding
non-voted, or councilmanic debt is counted against this 2.5%), 2.5% for certain utility purposes, and 2.5% for certain parks, open
space and economic development purposes. The total amount of voted and non-voted debt may not exceed 7.5%. The City has
signi cant bonding capacity, with voted indebtedness being 0% in 2019. The City currently doesn’t have any UTGO bonds
outstanding. The last UTGO bonds issued by the City were in 1999 to fund a library and a re station.
Limited Tax General Obligation (LTGO) Bonds: Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds are also called “councilmanic” bonds or
non-voted debt. These bonds may be issued by a vote of the legislative body and require a majority support. Because the
voters have not been asked to approve a tax increase to pay for the principal and interest, existing General Fund revenues must
be pledged to pay the debt service on a LTGO Bond. The City issued $39 Million of LTGO bonds in 2024 to fund projects in the
Tax Increment area in the northwest part of town.
Revenue Bond: Another debt nancing option to nance projects for any City enterprise, which is self-supporting like utilities, is
Revenue Bonds. Payment comes from user fees; so the debt is not backed by the full faith and credit of the City. Investors
consider these somewhat less secure than general obligation bonds as well.
Grants and Loans: Some of the funding for larger City capital projects comes from grants and loans made by Federal and State
agencies. Almost all federal funds are ‘passed through’ a State Agency lter. Some of the major agencies involved in funding
grants and loans are the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB), Washington State Recreation and Conservation Of ce
(RCO), Water Resources Program, and the Department of Ecology. Parks and Transportation projects are the largest
benefactors of such grants and loans to the City of Pasco. These funding options are typically of lower interest and can be
obtained by either Governmental or Enterprise Funds.
On-Going Revenue: Revenue is created by services like water, sewer, and taxes, etc. These revenues are used to fund capital
projects in their respective areas. The City follows the applicable regulation around Special Revenue Funds, Enterprise Funds
and General Funds.
Local Improvement District (LID): A Local Improvement District (LID) is a method by which a group of property owners can
share in the cost of infrastructure improvements. LIDs can be used to help nance improvements including:
Street overlays, repair, and construction;
Street lighting;
Utility expansion (Water, Sewer, Stormwater, Irrigation);
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 11Page 226 of 306
Overhead power conversion to underground;
Street beauti cation and revitalization projects; and
Park construction and improvements.
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 12Page 227 of 306
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 13Page 228 of 306
Capital Improvement Map
The CIP is a long-range schedule of proposed public facilities, infrastructure and major projects over a six-year period. The
proposed projects address needs such as enhancing programs and services to meet growth needs, maintain aging
infrastructure and support economic development across the city. The following link contains an interactive map displaying all
proposed projects within the upcoming six-year period along with a list of projects by category. Capital Improvement Plan
Map
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 14Page 229 of 306
Capital Improvements: Mul ti-year Plan
Total Capital Requested
534 ,512 ,597
135 Capital Improvement Projects
Total Funding Requested by Department
Expenditures Irrig
Parks And Recreation Public Works
PWRF Sewer
Storm Water
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
$101,350,441.45
$62,021,056.00
$70,259,300.00
$114,471,946.00
$101,810,443.00
$84,599,411.00
$0 $30M $60M $90M
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 21Page 230 of 306
Total Funding Requested by Source
Arterial Fund Bond - LTGO - Secured
Bond - Revenue - Secured Bond - Revenue - Unsecured
Economic Development Economic Development Fund
Grant - Secured Grant - Unsecured
I182 Impact Fund Loan - Secured
Loan - Unsecured Local Improvement District (ULID)
Park Development Fund Real Estate Excise Tax I
Real Estate Excise Tax II Street Overlay Fund
Tax Increment Financing Unknown
Utility - Irrigation Service Utility - Sewer Service
Utility - Stormwater Service Utility - Water Service
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
$101,350,441.45
$59,498,056.00
$70,259,300.00
$114,471,946.00
$106,910,443.00
$84,599,411.00
$0 $30M $60M $90M
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 22Page 231 of 306
Capital Costs Breakdown
Capital Costs
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
$101,350,441.45
$62,021,056.00
$70,259,300.00
$114,471,946.00
$101,810,443.00
$84,599,411.00
$0 $30M $60M $90M
Cost Savings & Revenues
Cost Savings
2025
2026
2027
2028
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$0 $500 $1K $1.5K $2K
Expenditures Requests
Itemized Requests for 2025-2030
Police Department Headquarters Expansion $8,500,000
The City of Pasco is experiencing rapid population growth, which in turn has required staff expansion throughout all City
departments. It is recognized that additional physical space is needed to accommodate such growth within the Police...
Total:$8,500,000
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 23Page 232 of 306
Public Works Requests
Itemized Requests for 2025-2030
Ainsworth Ave Pavement Preservation $2,082,000
The overlay and re-striping of Ainsworth Street/Avenue (SR397) will be conducted from 10th Avenue to the west and S
Oregon Avenue to the east. These improvements will enhance the road surface and visibility, ensuring a smoother and
safer commute...
Argent Rd Widening (Phase 4) - Rd 36 to Rd 44 $5,900,000
Phase 4 of urban road improvements to Argent Road, extending from Road 36 to Road 44, includes widening the street to
a three-lane section, enhancing illumination, upgrading stormwater facilities, and adding curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and
other...
Argent Rd/Rd 88 and Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 90 Pedestrian Crossings $1,122,048
Implement curb extensions, bulb-outs, advance stop bars, and a median refuge island to enhance pedestrian safety. This
project includes reduced curb radii, new stop signs, marked crosswalks with rectangular rapid ashing beacons (RRFB),
lane...
Burden Blvd/Madison Ave Intersection Improvements $2,170,000
This project will install a traf c signal at the intersection of Burden Blvd and Madison Ave. This project will include
necessary ADA improvements to ensure accessibility for all users, enhancing the overall safety and functionality of the...
Burden Blvd/Rd 60 Intersection Improvements $2,170,000
Enhancements at the intersection of Burden Blvd and Road 60 will include the installation of a traf c signal to improve
traf c control and ow. Additionally, the project will incorporate necessary ADA improvements to ensure the intersection
is...
Burden Rd/Rd 44 Intersection Improvements $2,170,000
Enhancements at the intersection of Burden Rd and Road 44 will include the installation of a traf c signal to improve
traf c control and ow. Additionally, the project will incorporate necessary ADA improvements to ensure the intersection
is...
Burns Rd Extension - Missing Link $7,850,000
The Burns Road Extension project will extend Burns Road from Road 68 to Rio Grande Lane. It will also include intersection
improvements at the intersection of Road 68 and Burns Road, with the installation of a traf c signal or roundabout. This...
Burns Rd Extension to Glade Rd $8,800,000
The Burns Road Extension project aims to extend Burns Road from the approximate alignment of Road 44 to Glade Road.
This extension will provide a crucial connection on the north side of the city, facilitating better cross-city travel. The project...
Burns Rd/Broadmoor Blvd Intersection Improvements $1,500,000
The Burns Rd/Broadmoor Blvd Intersection Improvements project involves installing a traf c signal at the intersection of
Burns Road and Broadmoor Blvd. This project will also include the construction of sidewalks and any necessary ADA...
Clark St Improvements $1,760,000
The Clark Street Improvements project involves adjusting the roadway con guration to enhance safety and usability for all
users. This will include vehicle travel lanes, bike lanes, improved lighting, and bulb-outs at crossing locations to...
Columbia St Improvements $1,580,000
The Columbia Street Improvements project aims to adjust the roadway con guration to enhance safety and usability for all
users. This includes adding vehicle travel lanes, bike lanes, improved lighting, and bulb-outs at crossing locations to...
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 24Page 233 of 306
Commercial Ave/Kartchner St. Intersection Improvements $2,400,000
Installation of a traf c signal at the intersection of Commercial Avenue and Kartchner Street, where the US 395 NB On/Off
Ramps are located. This project will also include necessary ADA improvements to ensure accessibility for all users.
Court St /Rd 68 Intersection Improvements $100,000
The project involves construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Road 68 and Court Street, along with pedestrian
improvements, to enhance traf c ow and safety in the area. This project is in its closeout phase, ensuring all nal...
Court St Improvements - Ped/Bike $6,110,000
Improve Court Street from Road 96 to Harris Road by adding bike and pedestrian facilities along with permanent traf c
calming features. These enhancements aim to create a safer and more accessible route for cyclists and pedestrians.
Court St Safety Improvements $450,000
The recon guration of Court Street from Road 40 to Road 68 will transform it into a three-lane road, featuring one lane in
each direction and a center two-way-left-turn lane. This project also includes the addition of designated bike lanes in...
Court Street/Rd 60 Intersection Improvements $1,950,000
The installation of a traf c signal at the intersection of Court Street and Road 60 will be undertaken to enhance safety and
traf c management. Necessary ADA improvements will also be included to ensure accessibility for all users.
Franklin County Irrigation District Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway $2,800,000
Construction of a multi-use pathway along the piped irrigation canal from Road 100 to Road 76. This pathway will provide a
dedicated space for both cyclists and pedestrians, enhancing connectivity and promoting non-motorized transportation
options...
Harris Rd/Crescent Rd Overpass $4,000,000
Construction of an overpass over I-182 to connect Harris Road and Crescent Road. This overpass will enhance connectivity
between the communities located north and south of I-182, providing an alternative route and alleviating traf c congestion
at...
I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Improvements - Eastbound $100,000
The project will enhance the eastbound exit from I-182 by adding a deceleration lane and exit loop ramp leading to a new
roundabout at Broadmoor Blvd (Rd 100). This upgrade aims to improve traf c ow and reduce congestion at the
interchange.
I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Improvements - Westbound $450,000
This project will construct a new multi-lane roundabout at the I-182 westbound ramp terminal at Broadmoor Blvd on the
north side of I-182. The new roundabout will enhance the ow of traf c exiting the highway and improve overall traf c...
I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Multiuse Pathway/Bridge $11,180,000
The project will construct a pedestrian/bicycle bridge with a multi-use pathway across I-182 on the west side of the existing
overpass, between ramp terminals. This new bridge will provide a safe and convenient route for non-vehicular traf c,...
James St Improvements $1,950,000
Reconstruction of two lanes of traf c along James Street will be undertaken. Additionally, pedestrian facilities may be
provided on one side of the roadway to enhance pedestrian access and safety.
Lewis St Corridor Improvements - 2nd Ave to 5th Ave (Phase 1)$9,128,000
The Lewis Street Corridor Improvements project will integrate enhancements made by the overpass project with those
from the Peanuts Park improvement project. The scope includes ADA improvements, crosswalks, widened sidewalks,
streetlights,...
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 25Page 234 of 306
Lewis St Corridor Improvements - 5th Ave to 10th Ave (Phase 2)$5,100,000
The second phase of the Lewis Street Corridor Improvements will incorporate ADA improvements, crosswalks, widened
sidewalks, streetlights, re-striping, and streetscape enhancements between 5th Avenue and 10th Avenue. To minimize
disruptions to...
Lewis St Overpass $100,000
This project involves the construction of a new overpass between 2nd Ave and Oregon Ave on Lewis St. The new overpass
will replace the existing underpass, which was originally built in 1973.The project is currently in the closeout phase,
ensuring...
Lewis St Pavement Preservation $5,146,000
Mill and overlay the entire existing pavement area. The work includes cutting and patching failed areas (alligator cracking
and spalling), taper milling at curved edges, and then overlaying with Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA). This process ensures...
Lewis Street Underpass Demolition $3,000,000
The Lewis Street underpass cap will be demolished to a depth of 6 feet. Post-demolition back ll will adhere to BNSF
requirements to ensure compliance and stability.
Lewis Street/Heritage Blvd Intersection Improvements $2,400,000
A traf c signal will be installed at the intersection of Lewis Street and Heritage Boulevard, along with necessary ADA
improvements to ensure accessibility.
Rainier Ave/Kartchner St Intersection Improvements $2,400,000
A new traf c signal will be installed at the intersection of Rainier Avenue and Kartchner Street, at the location of the US 395
SB On/Off Ramps. The project will include necessary ADA improvements to ensure accessibility for all users.
Rd 100 Widening $8,575,000
This project aims to expand the Road 100 corridor to a 3-lane section, extending from W Court St to Chapel Hill Blvd. The
widening process will include intersection improvements, such as the addition of turn lanes, to enhance traf c ow and...
Rd 40 E Extension $930,000
This project involves extending Road 40 E as a one-lane northbound roadway north of A Street to connect to E Lewis Place.
This extension will eliminate a dead-end road at East Lewis Place. The project scope includes signal adjustments, striping,...
Rd 40 East Pathway $1,850,000
This project involves constructing a multi-use pathway along Road 40 E from "A" Street to Sacajawea Park E. The pathway
will be located on the east side of E Road 40, providing a safe and accessible route for pedestrians and cyclists.
Rd 68 Widening - Chapel Hill Blvd to Argent Rd $5,500,000
This project will widen Rd 68 to 5 lanes from Chapel Hill Blvd to Argent Rd. The scope of the project includes adding
additional lanes to accommodate increased traf c ow and improve overall roadway capacity.
Rd 76 Improvements $2,000,000
This project will install a traf c signal at the intersection of Wrigley Drive and Road 76 and include any necessary ADA
improvements. The scope includes evaluating and implementing intersection improvements at Rd76/Wrigley Drive and...
Rd 76 Overpass $30,759,000
This project aims to extend Road 76 north from Chapel Hill Blvd to Burden Blvd by constructing an overpass across I-182,
thereby connecting communities situated on the north and south sides of the existing interstate. Integral to this initiative...
Road 108 Extension - Sandifur Pkwy to Harris Rd $3,330,000
This project involves the construction of a two-lane road extending from Harris Road to Sandifur Parkway. This
infrastructure development is a key component of the broader strategic initiative to support economic growth in the area.
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 26Page 235 of 306
Sacajawea Heritage Trail Levee Lowering $3,250,000
This project involves lowering the levee and re-installing a wider pathway for pedestrians and bicyclists along the
Sacajawea Heritage Trail, extending from Road 52 to Road 72.
Sandifur Pkwy Extension - Broadmoor Blvd to Rd 108 $8,050,000
This project will extend Sandifur Parkway from the vicinity of Road 103 to Road 108. Provisions for future traf c signals will
be included at the intersection of Sandifur and Road 105, and a roundabout will be constructed at the intersection of...
Sandifur Pkwy/Broadmoor Blvd Intersection Improvements $7,500,000
This project will enhance the intersection of Sandifur Parkway and Broadmoor Boulevard, including widening Broadmoor
Boulevard up to Burns Road. Additionally, plans include provisions for a future traf c signal at Buckingham Drive.
Sandifur Pkwy/Convention Dr Intersection Improvements $2,310,000
The Sandifur Parkway and Convention Drive Intersection Improvements project aims to install a new traf c signal to
manage the increasing traf c ow effectively. This project will include essential ADA improvements, ensuring the
intersection is...
Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 76 Intersection Safety Enhancements $2,031,000
The Sandifur Parkway and Road 76 Intersection Safety Enhancements project will transform the current two-way stop-
controlled intersection into either a roundabout or a signalized intersection. This upgrade includes vital safety features
such as...
Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 84 Intersection Improvements $2,250,000
The Sandifur Parkway and Road 84 Intersection Improvements project focuses on installing a new traf c signal to manage
the growing traf c effectively. This upgrade includes essential ADA improvements to ensure the intersection is accessible
to...
Shoreline Rd Realignment $3,250,000
The Shoreline Road Realignment project involves repositioning Shoreline Road from Shoreline Court to Burns Road. This
realignment is planned to coincide with the construction of a new park to the west of the proposed roadway. By moving
the road...
South 4th Ave Festival Street Improvements $1,080,000
The South 4th Avenue Festival Street Improvements project will transform South 4th Avenue, from Lewis Street to
Columbia Street, into a vibrant Festival Street. This project involves revising the roadway con guration and installing
sidewalk...
Sylvester St Overpass Pedestrian/Bicycle Access $3,810,000
The Sylvester Street Overpass Pedestrian/Bicycle Access project will create a dedicated overpass for pedestrians and
cyclists, featuring a sidewalk with a curb, ADA curb ramps, and a shared-use path/trail. This project will facilitate the safe...
Sylvester Street Safety Improvements $100,000
The Sylvester Street Safety Improvements project will re-stripe Sylvester Street from Road 54 to North 3rd Avenue.
Proposed enhancements include the addition of bicycle lanes, pedestrian improvements, and intersection adjustments.
These upgrades...
W 'A' St/6th Ave Pedestrian Crossing $592,000
The W 'A' Street and 6th Avenue Pedestrian Crossing project will enhance pedestrian safety by installing Rectangular
Rapid Flashing Beacons, curb extensions, illumination, signage, pavement markings, and curb ramps. These
improvements aim to...
Total:$183,035,048
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 27Page 236 of 306
Parks And Recreation Requests
Itemized Requests for 2025-2030
A Street Sports Complex Phase 2 $3,180,000
Phase 2 of the A Street Sports Complex would introduce additional sports elds and courts, a playground, and a
permanent restroom, storage, and concession building. The project would also expand the parking lot, provide additional
access to the...
A Street Sports Complex Phase 3 $3,700,000
Phase 3 of the A Street Sports Complex would add essential amenities based on community needs. Enhancements may
include additional parking, eld lighting, sports courts, turf and grass sports elds, bleachers, and food truck pads. These
upgrades...
Big Cross Mountain Bike Trails $250,000
This project would install a mountain bike skills course at Big Cross in an unused area along Road 36. The course would
feature a variety of designed obstacles connected by trails, catering to beginners and intermediate riders. By providing a...
Burden Blvd. Soccer Complex Improvement - Phase 2 $4,200,000
Building on the recommendations from the regional sports facility feasibility study conducted by Visit Tri-Cities, this
project would focus on further development and implementation of key improvements. Potential enhancements include
eld...
Burden Blvd. Soccer Complex Improvements - Phase 1 $1,800,000
This project would involve the installation of the main eld at the Burden Blvd Soccer Complex. This upgrade would
provide a durable, high-quality playing surface, enhancing the overall experience for athletes and reducing maintenance
needs. The...
City Hall Generator $467,000
This project involves installing purchased emergency generator for City Hall. The generator will ensure continuous
operations during power outages, enhancing the city's resilience and preparedness by providing reliable power for
essential services...
City-Wide Trail Connection and Trail Improvement $600,000
This project aims to install new trail connections and refurbish existing trails throughout the city's network. The ongoing
identi cation of improvement areas focuses on addressing gaps in connectivity between neighborhoods, schools, and...
Dog Park New Construction - W A St & S 17th Ave $150,000
This project proposes utilizing land near the current and proposed animal shelter, close to the Pasco Little League park
area along the river and the trailhead at Riverview Park for a dog park. The dog park would feature separate areas for
large...
Foster Wells Sports Complex $3,200,000
This project involves purchasing and developing approximately 20 acres of land into a multi-use sports complex. This
complex would feature a variety of sports elds, courts, and trails designed to meet the community's evolving needs. By
creating...
Franklin County Irrigation District Trail New Construction Phase 1 & 2 $500,000
A non-motorized multi-use ADA trail would be constructed along the Franklin County Irrigation District (FCID) property,
spanning from Court St to Road 100 and from Road 100 to Road 84. These sections, where the FCID has recently covered
their...
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 28Page 237 of 306
GESA Stadium Parking Lot Refurbishment $4,600,000
To meet economic development standards and improve our facilities, both aesthetically and functionally, enhancements
to the Gesa Stadium Parking Lot are proposed. This project includes repaving the parking lot and developing it for
commercial use,...
Highland Park Improvements (Goal Posts & Restroom/Storage Building)$372,642
This project will replace the temporary storage containers at Highland Park with a centrally located, permanent restroom
and storage building that meets ADA accessibility standards. The building will be positioned between the three football
elds...
Highland Park South Side Update $100,000
A new section of sidewalk would be installed along E Adelia Street on the south side of the park, along with a small
retaining wall, access stairs to the park, and an ADA path up to the visitor section bleachers. The project would also
include...
Irrigation Clock Conversion Replacement - City Wide $1,000,000
This project would upgrade irrigation clocks to a new smart, water conservation system. This advanced system allows for
centralized control, reducing staff time and travel. It can also adapt to weather changes, adjusting water schedules to...
Land Purchases - Parks $1,500,000
Aligned with the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Masterplan (PROS), this project aims to identify and purchase land for
future parks, recreation, and city development needs. By securing land now, the City will ensure that our growing
community...
Lighted Pickleball Complex - Broadmoor Area $1,560,000
Pickleball, the of cial sport of Washington State, is rapidly growing in popularity in the Tri-cities. This project envisions a
lighted pickleball complex featuring 8 to 20 courts with fencing, shade, and seating. The community has requested this...
Marina Dock B Replacement $2,310,000
Design and construct a replacement for Dock B at the Pasco Marina. The original dock was lost due to storm damage. This
project will restore the dock to ensure the marina continues to serve the community's recreational needs effectively.
Martin Luther King Center Renovation/Expansion - E Columbia St & S Wehe Ave $7,730,000
The Martin Luther King Community Center would be updated and expanded to better serve the community. The
expansion may include new of ces, community rooms, and a library, creating a more comprehensive facility. This
development would provide...
Memorial Park Conversion of Play Fields Refurbishment $950,000
The softball elds at Memorial Park are outdated and do not meet current standards, with non-functional lights on the
lighted eld. Many teams currently use the elds for practice and are in need of lighted spaces for evening sessions. The...
Memorial Pool - Bubble Cover & Improvements $1,208,623
This project involves the installation of a foundation and the purchase of a climate-controlled air dome "bubble" to enable
year-round use of Memorial Pool. The project will also include the acquisition of a removable bulkhead, allowing the pool...
Neighborhood Skate Spots $50,000
During the Pasco Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Plan community input session, a skate park emerged as a
community amenity of interest. Using the PROS plan for guidance on site placement and exploring the possibility of
piloting smaller...
Park Security/Pathway Lighting Pilot - Various Parks $175,000
Solar security lighting would be installed in one or more parks in the city where none currently exists. This pilot project
aims to test the ef ciency and durability of solar-powered lighting for park security. By enhancing safety with...
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 29Page 238 of 306
Pasco Specialty Kitchen Building Expansion $3,700,000
This project would involve the purchase of the building just south of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen (PSK) and expand the
kitchen facilities in the future. This expansion would provide additional space for local entrepreneurs and culinary...
Peanuts Park North Refurbishment $150,000
Peanuts Park North would be transformed to mirror the vibrant and welcoming atmosphere of Peanuts Park South and
Farmer's Market. This project would introduce new hardscape elements and features to create an open, user-friendly
space. The focus...
Playground update and Pour-in-place conversion program Replacement - Parks Throughout City $1,030,000
This project would systematically replace playgrounds that are over 20 years old and upgrade woodchips to pour-in-place
fall protection. These improvements would demonstrate pride in our parks, allow for modern play equipment, create safer
play...
Police HQ Generator $414,000
This project involves installing purchased emergency generator for Police Headquarters. The generator will ensure
continuous operations during power outages, enhancing the city's resilience and preparedness by providing reliable power
for...
Rd 54 Erwin Park $1,070,000
The city-owned property at Road 56 and Sylvester Street is designated for a future park, with planned amenities focusing
on exercise and recreation. This development would transform the area into a dynamic hub, providing a vital connection to
the...
Regional Way nding and City Gateways $500,000
Phase II would complete the design and construction of city gateway monument signs, implementing the 2018 Visit Tri-
Cities conceptual plan for regional enhancement. These monument signs would serve as welcoming landmarks at key
entry points to the...
Road 48 - Central Pasco Community Park $7,200,000
The City has acquired 20 acres of land off Road 48 to develop a comprehensive community park in Central Pasco. This
proposed park would feature courts, play elds, walking paths, playgrounds, pavilions, a spray park, and restrooms. The
development...
Sacajawea Trail BNSF Crossing $3,250,000
This project would connect the existing trail on the west side of the tracks to Schlagel Park on the east by constructing a
trail that passes under the BNSF railroad tracks. This trail would extend through Schlagel Park and continue along the...
Sacajawea Trail Levee Lowering - Rd 52 to Rd 72 $3,250,000
This project would refurbish the Sacajawea Trail by removing the existing path between Rd 52 and Rd 72 and lowering the
levee height along this section. The plan includes replacing the trail with a 12-foot-wide path, ensuring it matches the rest...
Shoreline Drive Park $60,000
This project will start with a study and the development of a concept plan for a new park in west Pasco, potentially along
Shoreline Drive. In the subsequent years, the necessary land will be purchased, and the park will be developed on the far...
Signature Community Park $7,600,000
This project involves purchasing and constructing a Signature Community Park to best serve public needs. A Community
Park, de ned as 20-40 acres, would include amenities such as parking, playgrounds, restroom facilities, walking trails,
picnic...
Sun Willows Pro Shop and Restaurant Replacement $1,075,000
This project proposes to update and replace the pro shop and restaurant at Sun Willows Golf Course. These improvements
would provide modern facilities and better services, enhancing the overall experience for golfers and visitors. This
initiative...
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 30Page 239 of 306
Sylvester Park Enhancements $150,000
Building on the recent addition of mini soccer courts, this project would update the restrooms, add a picnic shelter,
resurface the basketball courts, replace the old perimeter fencing around the courts, and install lighting for evening play....
Thunderbird/Farmer's Market Parking Lot $250,000
This project will convert the old Thunderbird Hotel parcel into a parking lot area. The project includes installing fencing,
lighting, landscaping, gates, and necessary drainage and paving. The new parking lot will provide additional parking next...
West Side Community Center $13,000,000
A new community center could be constructed on the western half of Pasco, providing a versatile space for programming,
rentals, meetings, events, and general community use. This facility would offer a hub for various activities and gatherings,...
Xeriscape Boulevards, Facilities & Parks $150,000
This program would implement xeriscaping across city facilities, parks, and boulevards. Xeriscaping involves landscaping
with native plants, rocks, and other materials that require minimal or no irrigation, reducing water usage and
maintenance...
Total:$82,452,265
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 31Page 240 of 306
Sewer Requests
Itemized Requests for 2025-2030
9th & WA Lift Station Improvements $1,000,000
The 9th & WA Lift Station Improvements project includes a comprehensive condition assessment for the wet well, wet well
coating, and the construction of a new wet well if needed. Additionally, the project involves land acquisition if required,...
Annual Sewer Upsizing Program $2,654,190
The Annual Sewer Upsizing Program is an ongoing initiative aimed at addressing the city's sewer system needs by
enabling the upsizing of sewer lines related to private developments or other capital projects. This program is essential for...
CSP #18 - Sylvester St Sewer Upsize - Rd 60 to 44 $10,000
This project involves upsizing approximately 5,400 linear feet of the existing 36" diameter gravity main with a new 48"
gravity main along Sylvester St between Road 60 and Road 44, as identi ed in CSP #18. An alternative alignment may
involve...
CSP #23 - Washington St Sewer Upsize - 15th Ave to 9th & Washington Lift Station $10,000
This project involves upsizing approximately 2,500 linear feet of the existing 36" diameter gravity main with a new 48"
gravity main along Washington St between approximately 15th Ave and the 9th and Washington Lift Station, as identi ed
in CSP...
CSP#14 - Court St Sewer Main Upsize - Rd 100 to Rd 110 $4,818,000
The CSP#14 - Court St Sewer Main Upsize project involves upsizing approximately 5,100 linear feet of the existing 18-inch
diameter gravity main to a new 30-inch gravity main along Court Street between Road 110 and Road 100. An alternative...
CSP#15 - Court St Sewer Main Upsize - Rd 97 to Rd 88 $3,730,000
The CSP#15 - Court St Sewer Main Upsize project involves upsizing approximately 3,100 linear feet of the existing 24-inch
diameter gravity main to a new 42-inch gravity main along Court Street between Road 97 and Road 88. An alternative
alignment...
CSP#17 - USACE Easement Sewer Main Upsize - Rd 72 to Rd 60 $4,225,000
The CSP#17 - USACE Easement Sewer Main Upsize project involves replacing 4,400 linear feet of the existing 36-inch
diameter gravity main with a new 54-inch gravity main between Road 72 and Road 60. This upgrade is in line with
recommendations from...
CSP#20 - USACE Easement Sewer Main Upsize -Rd 36 West of US 395 $2,825,000
The CSP#20 - USACE Easement Sewer Main Upsize project involves upsizing approximately 2,900 linear feet of the existing
36-inch diameter gravity main to a new 54-inch gravity main. This work will be conducted within Road 36 and within
private...
CSP#21 - USACE Easement Sewer Main Upsize - Rd 28 to US 395 $1,525,000
The CSP#21 - USACE Easement Sewer Main Upsize project involves upsizing approximately 1,800 linear feet of the existing
30-inch diameter gravity main to a new 54-inch gravity main. This work will be conducted within private easements
between US...
Maitland Lift Station Improvements $1,000,000
The Maitland Lift Station Improvements project involves replacing all valves and preparing a bypass plan for use during
operation and construction. Additionally, this project includes purchasing a new 75HP pump, along with all necessary
electrical...
Riverview West Sewer Lift Station $1,865,000
To support development within the West Riverview area at an appropriate density, the construction of a sanitary sewer lift
station is needed. This project will facilitate the development within this sub-basin area, enabling properties to be served...
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 32Page 241 of 306
Road 68 Lift Station $2,000,000
Based on additional planning analysis to support a future Comprehensive Sewer Plan amendment, the construction of a
sanitary sewer lift station is needed to serve the unsewered Riverview East areas. The construction of this lift station and
force...
Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements (Phase 2)$10,200,055
The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements project is the second phase of the WWTP Improvements as
recommended by the WWTP Facility Plan. This phase focuses on solids treatment and water disinfection, as well as the
completion of the...
Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements Phase 3 $1,000,000
The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements Phase 3 project is part of a multi-phase effort to enhance the
facility's operations. This phase may include upgrades to secondary treatment, depending on the recommendations of the
Wastewater...
Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements Phase 4 $1,000,000
The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements Phase 4 project is part of an ongoing effort to enhance the
facility's operations. This phase may include upgrades to secondary treatment and the implementation of anaerobic
digestion processes,...
West UGA Expansion Sewer LID $11,701,000
The West UGA Expansion Sewer LID project aims to support development within the portion of the City’s UGA Expansion
Area west of Road 68 at an appropriate density. This involves constructing sanitary sewer trunk mains and a sewer lift
station as...
Total:$49,563,245
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 33Page 242 of 306
PWRF Requests
Itemized Requests for 2025-2030
PWRF Farm Well 8 Replacement $990,000
The PWRF Farm Well 8 Replacement project involves drilling a new irrigation well to replace the existing farm well, which
has reached the end of its useful life. This upgrade is essential to maintain the reliability and ef ciency of the...
PWRF Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements $6,000,000
The PWRF Foster Wells Lift Station Improvements project aims to address corrosion issues caused by process water from
contributing processors. This involves replacing the existing header at the Foster Wells Lift Station and adding a second
header...
PWRF Irrigation System - Farm Upgrades $17,000,000
The PWRF Irrigation System - Farm Upgrades project will expand the City-owned farm circle land treatment system (LTS).
This includes increasing the capacity of the industrial pump station and extending/enlarging the irrigation distribution
system...
PWRF Lab and Of ce $950,000
The PWRF Lab and Of ce project will construct a new of ce building to provide adequate workspaces and restrooms for
staff. This building will also include a laboratory equipped with the necessary equipment and appurtenances to facilitate
on-site...
PWRF Pretreatment Improvements (Phase 2) Winter Storage $5,000,000
The PWRF Pretreatment Improvements (Phase 2) Winter Storage project involves constructing three lined ponds to add
330 million gallons of winter storage capacity for process wastewater from existing and anticipated future industrial food...
Total:$29,940,000
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 34Page 243 of 306
Storm Requests
Itemized Requests for 2025-2030
In l tration Improvements Program $2,850,000
The In ltration Improvements Program addresses in ltration capacity issues throughout the city, as ooding is identi ed
and/or reported and prioritized. The program aims to reduce ooding of streets and prevent early damage to pavement,...
Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement $680,520
The Schlagel Park Stormwater Main Replacement project involves replacing aging stormwater pipes along the western
portion of Schlagel Park. The existing pipeline, which is 42 inches in diameter, has sustained damage over approximately
430 feet due...
Stormwater Pipe Relining (Phase 1)$1,415,000
This project includes the relining of existing aging stormwater pipelines at ve critical locations. Speci cally, it will address
302.5 linear feet of 15-inch pipe on 8th Ave from W Margaret to W Park, 958 linear feet of 15-inch pipe on W Park...
Stormwater Pipe Relining (Phase 2)$600,000
This project will reline or repair the stormwater pipes at four critical locations. It includes relining 348 linear feet of 30-inch
concrete pipe under 1st Avenue between W. Lewis and W. Columbia, relining 842 linear feet of 18-inch pipe tributary...
Sylvester Pipe Repair - 5th Ave to 10th Ave $841,000
The Sylvester Pipe Repair - 5th Ave to 10th Ave project involves repairing or replacing the damaged stormwater conveyance
system along Sylvester Street between 5th Avenue and 10th Avenue. Pipeline inspection identi ed fractures in the
existing...
Total:$6,386,520
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 35Page 244 of 306
Water Requests
Itemized Requests for 2025-2030
Al ton Street Water Main Extension - Wehe Ave to Alley East of Owen Ave $490,000
This project will involve constructing approximately 1,000 linear feet of 8" ductile iron water main along Alton St, stretching
from Wehe Ave to the alley east of Owen Ave. As part of the project, one re hydrant will be installed at the...
BWTP Project 1 - Electrical Building $8,536,364
This project provides the capital improvements related to upgrades needed to maintain operability at the Butter eld
Water Treatment Plant (WTP). Upgrades under this project scope include electrical power utility feed modi cations, a
standalone...
BWTP Project 11 - Ozone $38,940,000
This project provides the capital improvements related to upgrades needed to maintain operability at the Butter eld
Water Treatment Plant (WTP). The scope of improvements for this phase includes the design and construction of a new
ozone...
BWTP Project 16 - Intake Screens $1,530,000
This project provides the capital improvements related to upgrades needed to maintain operability at the Butter eld
Water Treatment Plant (WTP). The scope of improvements for this phase may include the assessment and replacement of
the existing...
BWTP Project 3 - Raw Water Pump Station $6,295,000
This project provides the capital improvements related to upgrades needed to maintain operability at the Butter eld
Water Treatment Plant (WTP). Improvements include raw water pump station capacity and electrical system upgrades for
the...
BWTP Project 5 - Chemical Building $19,610,000
This project provides the capital improvements related to upgrades needed to maintain operability at the Butter eld
Water Treatment Plant (WTP). Improvements include a completely new chemical facility providing space and equipment
for all...
BWTP Project 6 - Filters $26,960,000
This project provides the capital improvements related to upgrades needed to maintain operability at the Butter eld
Water Treatment Plant (WTP). The scope of improvements for this phase includes the design and construction of a new
lter complex...
BWTP Project 8 - Floculation Basins $11,750,000
This project provides the capital improvements related to upgrades needed to maintain operability at the Butter eld
Water Treatment Plant (WTP). The scope of improvements for this phase includes the design and construction of two new
occulation...
Land - Plant Expansion $1,000,000
This project involves the purchase of land adjacent to the existing raw water intake structure and backwash settling basins
located south of W. Washington Street along the Columbia River. The acquisition of this land is crucial for supporting...
Rd 103 Water Main Extension - Maple Dr to Willow Way $255,150
This project will construct approximately 825 linear feet of 8" ductile iron water main along Rd 103, connecting the water
mains on Maple Dr and Willow Way. The construction aims to improve the overall water distribution system by creating a
loop,...
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 36Page 245 of 306
Rd 60 Water Main Replacement - Court St to W Pearl St $1,365,000
This project will replace approximately 3,000 linear feet of deteriorating 6" thin wall PVC water line with a more robust
system consisting of approximately 1,400 linear feet of 12" ductile iron pipe along Road 60 and 1,600 linear feet of 12"...
Rd 76 Water Main Replacement - Wernett Rd to W Court St $960,000
This project aims to replace approximately 1,700 linear feet of outdated 4" and 6" thin wall irrigation class PVC water lines
with more durable 8" and 12" ductile iron pipes. Additionally, new re hydrants will be installed to enhance re...
Reservoir Storage Tank - Zone 2 $22,000,000
This project will design and construct a new 3 to 4 million gallon (MG) water storage tank in Pressure Zone 2. The new tank
aims to enhance the water storage capacity of the area, ensuring suf cient water supply to meet the demands of the
community.
Richardson Rd Water Main Replacement - Rd 92 to Rd 96 $485,100
The water main in Richardson Road between Road 92 and Road 96 is currently not connected and is made up of
undersized thin wall PVC pipe. This project will involve the installation of approximately 1,800 feet of 8" water main,
eliminating three...
Riverhaven Street Water Main Extension - Rd 36 to Rd 40 $440,000
This project will construct approximately 1,400 linear feet of 8" ductile iron water main along Riverhaven St from Rd 36 to
Rd 40. The dead-end water mains at the southern end of these streets will be connected to the new water main, creating
a...
Road 49 Water Main Replacement - Replace 2in with 8in South of Sylvester $1,000,000
This project will replace the aging water main that runs along Road 49, south of Sylvester Street. The current 2-inch
diameter main will be upgraded to an 8-inch diameter main to enhance the water supply infrastructure.
Seismic Improvements - Various Facilities $3,500,000
This project will perform seismic assessment and necessary seismic retro ts of the water treatment facilities, pump
stations, storage tanks, and other assets as recommended in the 2020 Risk and Resiliency Assessment. The goal is to
enhance the...
Star Lane Water Main Replacement - Rd 100 to Rd 97 $325,000
This project will upsize an existing 2" water line with an 8" water main and install re hydrant(s) to service this area. The
replacement will cover the stretch of Star Lane between Road 100 and Road 97. The existing 2" water line has been...
West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Expansion (Phase 2) - 12MGD $2,549,340
This project will provide the necessary improvements to increase treatment capacity at the West Pasco Water Treatment
Plant (WPWTP) to 12MGD. To achieve rm capacity at 12MGD, three phases of projects are needed, with a fourth phase
allowing for...
West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Expansion (Phase 3 & 4) - Firm Capacity & 18MG $14,094,320
The project aims to provide the necessary improvements to reliably achieve a rm capacity of 12MGD at the West Pasco
Water Treatment Plant (WPWTP). To reach rm capacity, three phases of projects are required, with a fourth phase
enabling the...
Zone 2 PRVs (Hillsboro & Capital)$2,000,000
This project involves modifying two existing pressure reducing valves (PRVs) to recon gure the water supply feed from
Zone 3 to Zone 2 in the east Pasco industrial area. The recon guration will include the modi cation of the Hillsboro PRV
and...
Total:$164,085,274
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 37Page 246 of 306
Irrig Requests
Itemized Requests for 2025-2030
Drill New Irrigation Well $4,175,000
The Drill New Irrigation Well project involves installing new irrigation wells at the existing First Place, Linda Loviisa, and I-
182 sites to increase source capacity. This project will also replace undersized transmission pipes at each location...
Irrigation System Expansion $6,375,245
The Irrigation System Expansion project aims to enhance irrigation service throughout the service area primarily through
the City’s irrigation system. Due to the current system’s limited capacity as of spring 2021, an additional source of supply...
Total:$10,550,245
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 38Page 247 of 306
APPENDIX
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 39Page 248 of 306
Glossary
Abatement: A reduction or elimination of a real or personal property tax, motor vehicle excise, a fee, charge, or special
assessment imposed by a governmental unit. Granted only on application of the person seeking the abatement and only by
the committing governmental unit.
Accounting System: The total structure of records and procedures that identify record, classify, and report information on the
nancial position and operations of a governmental unit or any of its funds, account groups, and organizational components.
Accrued Interest: The amount of interest that has accumulated on the debt since the date of the last interest payment, and on
the sale of a bond, the amount accrued up to but not including the date of delivery (settlement date). (See Interest)
Amortization: The gradual repayment of an obligation over time and in accordance with a predetermined payment schedule.
Appropriation: A legal authorization from the community's legislative body to expend money and incur obligations for speci c
public purposes. An appropriation is usually limited in amount and as to the time period within which it may be expended.
Arbitrage: As applied to municipal debt, the investment of tax-exempt bonds or note proceeds in higher yielding, taxable
securities. Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Code restricts this practice and requires (beyond certain limits) that
earnings be rebated (paid) to the IRS.
Assessed Valuation: A value assigned to real estate or other property by a government as the basis for levying taxes.
Audit: An examination of a community's nancial systems, procedures, and data by a certi ed public accountant (independent
auditor), and a report on the fairness of nancial statements and on local compliance with statutes and regulations. The audit
serves as a valuable management tool in evaluating the scal performance of a community.
Audit Report: Prepared by an independent auditor, an audit report includes: (a) a statement of the scope of the audit; (b)
explanatory comments as to application of auditing procedures; (c) ndings and opinions. It is almost always accompanied by a
management letter which contains supplementary comments and recommendations.
Available Funds: Balances in the various fund types that represent non-recurring revenue sources. As a matter of sound
practice, they are frequently appropriated to meet unforeseen expenses, for capital expenditures or other one-time costs.
Balance Sheet: A statement that discloses the assets, liabilities, reserves and equities of a fund or governmental unit at a
speci ed date.
Betterments (Special Assessments): Whenever a speci c area of a community receives bene t from a public improvement
(e.g., water, sewer, sidewalk, etc.), special property taxes may be assessed to reimburse the governmental entity for all or part of
the costs it incurred. Each parcel receiving bene t from the improvement is assessed for its proportionate share of the cost of
such improvements. The proportionate share may be paid in full or the property owner may request that the assessors
apportion the betterment over 20 years. Over the life of the betterment, one year’s apportionment along with one year’s
committed interest computed from October 1 to October 1 is added to the tax bill until the betterment has been paid.
Bond: A means to raise money through the issuance of debt. A bond issuer/borrower promises in writing to repay a speci ed
sum of money, alternately referred to as face value, par value or bond principal, to the buyer of the bond on a speci ed future
date (maturity date), together with periodic interest at a speci ed rate. The term of a bond is always greater than one year. (See
Note)
Bond and Interest Record: (Bond Register) – The permanent and complete record maintained by a treasurer for each bond
issue. It shows the amount of interest and principal coming due each date and all other pertinent information concerning the
bond issue.
Bonds Authorized and Unissued: Balance of a bond authorization not yet sold. Upon completion or abandonment of a
project, any remaining balance of authorized and unissued bonds may not be used for other purposes, but must be rescinded
by the community's legislative body to be removed from community's books.
Bond Issue: Generally, the sale of a certain number of bonds at one time by a governmental unit.
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 40Page 249 of 306
Bond Rating (Municipal): A credit rating assigned to a municipality to help investors assess the future ability, legal obligation,
and willingness of the municipality (bond issuer) to make timely debt service payments. Stated otherwise, a rating helps
prospective investors determine the level of risk associated with a given xed-income investment. Rating agencies, such as
Moody's and Standard and Poors, use rating systems, which designate a letter or a combination of letters and numerals where
AAA is the highest rating and C1 is a very low rating.
Budget: A plan for allocating resources to support particular services, purposes and functions over a speci ed period of time.
(See Performance Budget, Program Budget)
Capital Assets: All real and tangible property used in the operation of government, which is not easily converted into cash, and
has an initial useful live extending beyond a single nancial reporting period. Capital assets include land and land
improvements; infrastructure such as roads, bridges, water and sewer lines; easements; buildings and building improvements;
vehicles, machinery and equipment. Communities typically de ne capital assets in terms of a minimum useful life and a
minimum initial cost. (See Fixed Assets)
Capital Budget: An appropriation or spending plan that uses borrowing or direct outlay for capital or xed asset
improvements. Among other information, a capital budget should identify the method of nancing each recommended
expenditure, i.e., tax levy or rates, and identify those items that were not recommended. (See Capital Assets, Fixed Assets)
Cash: Currency, coin, checks, postal and express money orders and bankers’ drafts on hand or on deposit with an of cial or
agent designated as custodian of cash and bank deposits.
Cash Management: The process of monitoring the ebb and ow of money in an out of municipal accounts to ensure cash
availability to pay bills and to facilitate decisions on the need for short- term borrowing and investment of idle cash.
Certi cate of Deposit (CD): A bank deposit evidenced by a negotiable or non-negotiable instrument, which provides on its
face that the amount of such deposit plus a speci ed interest payable to a bearer or to any speci ed person on a certain
speci ed date, at the expiration of a certain speci ed time, or upon notice in writing.
Classi cation of Real Property: Assessors are required to classify all real property according to use into one of four classes:
residential, open space, commercial, and industrial. Having classi ed its real properties, local of cials are permitted to
determine locally, within limitations established by statute and the Commissioner of Revenue, what percentage of the tax
burden is to be borne by each class of real property and by personal property owners.
Collective Bargaining: The process of negotiating workers' wages, hours, bene ts, working conditions, etc., between an
employer and some or all of its employees, who are represented by a recognized labor union. regarding wages, hours and
working conditions.
Consumer Price Index: The statistical measure of changes, if any, in the overall price level of consumer goods and services. The
index is often called the "cost-of-living index."
Cost-Bene t Analysis: A decision-making tool that allows a comparison of options based on the level of bene t derived and
the cost to achieve the bene t from different alternatives.
Debt Burden: The amount of debt carried by an issuer usually expressed as a measure of value (i.e., debt as a percentage of
assessed value, debt per capita, etc.). Sometimes debt burden refers to debt service costs as a percentage of the total annual
budget.
Debt Service: The repayment cost, usually stated in annual terms and based on an amortization schedule, of the principal and
interest on any particular bond issue.
Encumbrance: A reservation of funds to cover obligations arising from purchase orders, contracts, or salary commitments that
are chargeable to, but not yet paid from, a speci c appropriation account.
Enterprise Funds: An enterprise fund is a separate accounting and nancial reporting mechanism for municipal services for
which a fee is charged in exchange for goods or services. It allows a community to demonstrate to the public the portion of
total costs of a service that is recovered through user charges and the portion that is subsidized by the tax levy, if any. With an
enterprise fund, all costs of service delivery--direct, indirect, and capital costs—are identi ed. This allows the community to
recover total service costs through user fees if it chooses. Enterprise accounting also enables communities to reserve the
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 41Page 250 of 306
"surplus" or net assets unrestricted generated by the operation of the enterprise rather than closing it out to the general fund
at year-end. Services that may be treated as enterprises include, but are not limited to, water, sewer, hospital, and airport
services.
Equalized Valuations (EQVs): The determination of the full and fair cash value of all property in the community that is subject
to local taxation.
Estimated Receipts: A term that typically refers to anticipated local revenues often based on the previous year's receipts and
represent funding sources necessary to support a community's annual budget. (See Local Receipts)
Exemptions: A discharge, established by statute, from the obligation to pay all or a portion of a property tax. The exemption is
available to particular categories of property or persons upon the timely submission and approval of an application to the
assessors. Properties exempt from taxation include hospitals, schools, houses of worship, and cultural institutions. Persons who
may qualify for exemptions include disabled veterans, blind individuals, surviving spouses, and seniors.
Expenditure: An outlay of money made by municipalities to provide the programs and services within their approved budget.
Fiduciary Funds: Repository of money held by a municipality in a trustee capacity or as an agent for individuals, private
organizations, other governmental units, and other funds. These include pension (and other employee bene t) trust funds,
investment trust funds, private- purpose trust funds, and agency funds.
Fixed Assets: Long-lived, assets such as buildings, equipment and land obtained or controlled as a result of past transactions
or circumstances.
Fixed Costs: Costs that are legally or contractually mandated such as retirement, FICA/Social Security, insurance, debt service
costs or interest on loans.
Float: The difference between the bank balance for a local government’s account and its book balance at the end of the day.
The primary factor creating oat is clearing time on checks and deposits. Delays in receiving deposit and withdrawal
information also in uence oat.
Full Faith and Credit: A pledge of the general taxing powers for the payment of governmental obligations. Bonds carrying
such pledges are usually referred to as general obligation or full faith and credit bonds.
Fund: An accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts that are segregated for the purpose of carrying on identi ed
activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with speci c regulations, restrictions, or limitations.
Fund Accounting: Organizing nancial records into multiple, segregated locations for money. A fund is a distinct entity within
the municipal government in which nancial resources and activity (assets, liabilities, fund balances, revenues, and
expenditures) are accounted for independently in accordance with speci c regulations, restrictions or limitations. Examples of
funds include the general fund and enterprise funds. Communities whose accounting records are organized according to the
Uniform Municipal Accounting System (UMAS) use multiple funds.
GASB 34: A major pronouncement of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board that establishes new criteria on the form
and content of governmental nancial statements. GASB 34 requires a report on overall nancial health, not just on individual
funds. It requires more complete information on the cost of delivering value estimates on public infrastructure assets, such as
bridges, road, sewers, etc. It also requires the presentation of a narrative statement the government's nancial performance,
trends and prospects for the future.
GASB 45: This is another Governmental Accounting Standards Board major pronouncement that each public entity account
for and report other postemployment bene ts in its accounting statements. Through actuarial analysis, municipalities must
identify the true costs of the OPEB earned by employees over their estimated years of actual service.
General Fund: The fund used to account for most nancial resources and activities governed by the normal appropriation
process.
General Obligation Bonds: Bonds issued by a municipality for purposes allowed by statute that are backed by the full faith and
credit of its taxing authority.
Governing Body: A board, committee, commission, or other executive or policymaking bodyof a municipality or school district.
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 42Page 251 of 306
Indirect Cost: Costs of a service not re ected in the operating budget of the entity providing the service. An example of an
indirect cost of providing water service would be the value of time spent by non-water department employees processing
water bills. A determination of these costs is necessary to analyze the total cost of service delivery. The matter of indirect costs
arises most often in the context of enterprise funds.
Interest: Compensation paid or to be paid for the use of money, including amounts payable at periodic intervals or discounted
at the time a loan is made. In the case of municipal bonds, interest payments accrue on a day-to-day basis, but are paid every
six months.
Interest Rate: The interest payable, expressed as a percentage of the principal available for use during a speci ed period of
time. It is always expressed in annual terms.
Investments: Securities and real estate held for the production of income in the form of interest, dividends, rentals or lease
payments. The term does not include xed assets used in governmental operations.
Line Item Budget: A budget that separates spending into categories, or greater detail, such as supplies, equipment,
maintenance, or salaries, as opposed to a program budget.
Local Aid: Revenue allocated by the state or counties to municipalities and school districts.
Maturity Date: The date that the principal of a bond becomes due and payable in full.
Municipal(s): (As used in the bond trade) "Municipal" refers to any state or subordinate governmental unit. "Municipals" (i.e.,
municipal bonds) include not only the bonds of all political subdivisions, such as cities, towns, school districts, special districts,
counties but also bonds of the state and agencies of the state.
Note: A short-term loan, typically with a maturity date of a year or less.
Objects of Expenditures: A classi cation of expenditures that is used for coding any department disbursement, such as
“personal services,” “expenses,” or “capital outlay.”
Of cial Statement: A document prepared for potential investors that contains information about a prospective bond or note
issue and the issuer. The of cial statement is typically published with the notice of sale. It is sometimes called an offering
circular or prospectus.
Operating Budget: A plan of proposed expenditures for personnel, supplies, and other expenses for the coming scal year.
Overlapping Debt: A community's proportionate share of the debt incurred by an overlapping government entity, such as a
regional school district, regional transit authority, etc.
Performance Budget: A budget that stresses output both in terms of economy and ef ciency.
Principal: The face amount of a bond, exclusive of accrued interest.
Program: A combination of activities to accomplish an end.
Program Budget: A budget that relates expenditures to the programs they fund. The emphasis of a program budget is on
output.
Purchased Services: The cost of services that are provided by a vendor.
Refunding of Debt: Transaction where one bond issue is redeemed and replaced by a new bond issue under conditions
generally more favorable to the issuer.
Reserve Fund: An amount set aside annually within the budget of a town to provide a funding source for extraordinary or
unforeseen expenditures.
Revaluation: The assessors of each community are responsible for developing a reasonable and realistic program to achieve
the fair cash valuation of property in accordance with constitutional and statutory requirements. The nature and extent of that
program will depend on the assessors’ analysis and consideration of many factors, including, but not limited to, the status of
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 43Page 252 of 306
the existing valuation system, the results of an in-depth sales ratio study, and the accuracy of existing property record
information.
Revenue Anticipation Note (RAN): A short-term loan issued to be paid off by revenues, such as tax collections and state aid.
RANs are full faith and credit obligations.
Revenue Bond: A bond payable from and secured solely by speci c revenues and thereby not a full faith and credit obligation.
Revolving Fund: Allows a community to raise revenues from a speci c service and use those revenues without appropriation to
support the service.
Sale of Real Estate Fund: A fund established to account for the proceeds of the sale of municipal real estate other than
proceeds acquired through tax title foreclosure.
Stabilization Fund: A fund designed to accumulate amounts for capital and other future spending purposes, although it may
be appropriated for any lawful purpose.
Surplus Revenue: The amount by which cash, accounts receivable, and other assets exceed liabilities and reserves.
Tax Rate: The amount of property tax stated in terms of a unit of the municipal tax base; for example, $14.80 per $1,000 of
assessed valuation of taxable real and personal property.
Tax Title Foreclosure: The procedure initiated by a municipality to obtain legal title to real property already in tax title and on
which property taxes are overdue.
Trust Fund: In general, a fund for money donated or transferred to a municipality with speci c instructions on its use. As
custodian of trust funds, the treasurer invests and expends such funds as stipulated by trust agreements, as directed by the
commissioners of trust funds or by the community's legislative body. Both principal and interest may be used if the trust is
established as an expendable trust. For nonexpendable trust funds, only interest (not principal) may be expended as directed.
Uncollected Funds: Recently deposited checks included in an account’s balance but drawn on other banks and not yet
credited by the Federal Reserve Bank or local clearinghouse to the bank cashing the checks. (These funds may not be loaned
or used as part of the bank’s reserves and they are not available for disbursement.)
Undesignated Fund Balance: Monies in the various government funds as of the end of the scal year that are neither
encumbered nor reserved, and are therefore available for expenditure once certi ed as part of free cash.
Unreserved Fund Balance (Surplus Revenue Account): The amount by which cash, accounts receivable, and other assets
exceed liabilities and restricted reserves. It is akin to a "stockholders’ equity" account on a corporate balance sheet. It is not,
however, available for appropriation in full because a portion of the assets listed as "accounts receivable" may be taxes
receivable and uncollected. (See Free Cash)
Valuation (100 Percent): The legal requirement that a community’s assessed value on property must re ect its market, or full
and fair cash value.
City of Pasco | Capital Improvement Plan Page 44Page 253 of 306
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 4, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 9/9/24
FROM: Darcy Buckley, Finance Director
Finance
SUBJECT: First Budget Presentation: Utilities (25 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Introduction of 2025 - 2026 Water Sewer Utility Biennial Budget
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Water Sewer Utility Fund 2025-2026 Biennial Budget
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Water/Sewer Utility Fund was established in 1954. Included in the fund are
unique utility systems providing potable water, municipal sewer, irrigation
water, process water reuse treatment and stormwater services. For each utility
system within the fund, separate accounting records are maintained to record
each liabilities, inflows, assets, deferred expenses, systems' revenues,
the practice, accounting This and fund and outflows deferred balances.
resulting reporting, are necessary to support calculation of distinct rates for
each individual service and avoidance of one utility's rate payers subsidizing
costs belonging to another utility.
City accounting staff performs ongoing analysis based on each utilities'
elements and activity both throughout the year and as part of the budget
process. Additionally, rate analysis is performed routinely by way of specialized
consultation.
Upon adoption, the budget authorizes and provides a framework for
managerial control of financial operations.
Page 254 of 306
V. DISCUSSION:
All cities in Washington State must prepare a comprehensive entity-wide
budget. Like any good plan, the budget serves as a roadmap to guide decision
making. The key components of a budget include:
1. Establishment of anticipated expenditure levels while ensuring adequacy of
revenue resources,
2. Review of capital needs, both replacement in nature as well as construction
of new infrastructure,
3. Projection of cash flow sufficiency.
Utility Fund budgeting is a joint effort of Finance Department, Public Works
Department, and the City Manager's Office. As part of this process, past
activity and current trends have been reviewed. A comparison has been
completed against expectations of existing rate studies to ensure that the
proposed budget is a fiscally responsible one.
The City has faced challenges in addressing deferred maintenance for its water
and sewer systems while also preparing for the substantial ongoing and future
growth. Significant investments in infrastructure shows in the capital
expenditures. Staff has mitigated high rate increases to ratepayers by targeting
grants and low-interest loans. In last five years, City has received over $185
million in low-interest loans and grants, saving the utility system over $100
million repayment debt standard of years over payments interest in 30
schedule.
This biennial budget period includes the final Council approved rate increases
identified in rate studies concluded in 2021. Irrigation and stormwater rates
have not been increased since 2022. An irrigation rate study initiated in 2023 is
nearing completion and will be presented to Council. Cost of service study for
Process Reuse Water Facility is complete follow intensive review and
collaboration with Processors and City staff. Included in the 2025-2026 Biennial
Budget are dollars allocated for renewal of water, sewer and stormwater rate
studies. Ensuring that rates support the cost of service is a requirement for the
City. City will be unable to receive potential low interest loans or be able to
issue debt if the rates are inadequate to support expenses.
The focus of this presentation is rate-funded expenditures including operational
costs like labor, supplies, services, and existing debt service. Council is in the
process of reviewing Capital Improvement Plan and the approval of that plan
will inform the capital budget for the utilities.
Page 255 of 306
Pasco City Council Meeting
September 9, 2024
Pa
g
e
2
5
6
o
f
3
0
6
City of Pasco Utilities
•Financial activity accounted for separately by system of service
•Prohibits rate payers of one utility from subsidizing costs of another utility
•Combined fund enhances marketability of debt
•Combined fund shares risk of liability among all rate payer
Water Stormwater Sewer Irrigation PWRF
Customer
Accounts 23,223 21,893 19,677 9,047 7
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
70,000
75,000
80,000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Number Utility Accounts
Utility Accounts
Pa
g
e
2
5
7
o
f
3
0
6
Rate History
•Analysis with consulting firm evaluates cost of service and revenue
requirements over an extended time frame. Allows for consistency of rates.
•Stormwater and Irrigation studies occurred in 2015
•Final study-enacted rate increase occurred in 2022
•Irrigation rate study will be coming to Council in the coming 2 months
•Water and Sewer studies occurred in 2021
•PWRF cost of service study completed in 2024
Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Water 6.5% 6.5% 6.5% 5.0% 5.0%
Sewer 0.0% 0.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
Pa
g
e
2
5
8
o
f
3
0
6
Utility Fund Budget & Assumptions
Presentation includes preliminary budget figures
Focused on operational, rate revenue supported expenditures
Only non-CIP capital is reflected
Utility Fund 2025/2026 Operational Budget requires final review
Inclusion of various items will impact finalized budget, including Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) spending and capital supporting revenues.
Impact of water treatment agreements and code amendm ents will be added
Labor related budget, composed of wages and benefits, include the following assumptions:
2025 Positional step increases based on performance appraisal process
2025 Collectively bargained contractual agreements
Estimated cost of living adjustment in 2026 that will be revised
Proposed budget excludes estimated significant repairs and maintenance. Budget amendment will be requested if necessary, in future.
Pa
g
e
2
5
9
o
f
3
0
6
Fund Financial - Operational
Revenue Sources:
Charges for services
Fines
Miscellaneous, major contribution
from interest earnings
Expense Drivers:
Labor
Supplies
Services
Large scale maintenance
Debt service, including principal
and interest
2019-2020 2021-2022 2023-2024 2025-2026
Net 11,395,498 15,273,191 10,239,125 (1,114,472)
Revenue 62,183,894 69,345,870 80,806,784 81,303,733
Expense 50,788,396 54,072,679 70,567,659 82,418,205
(10)
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Utility Revenue and Expense History
(Operational Costs)
Pa
g
e
2
6
0
o
f
3
0
6
Fund Financial – Capital
Revenue Sources:
Connection Fees
Grants
Debt Proceeds
Expense Drivers:
Capital Projects
2019-2020 2021-2022 2023-2024
Net (3,636,205) (2,304,647) (17,388,816)
Revenue 25,181,228 53,565,230 121,898,223
Expense 28,817,433 55,869,877 139,287,039
(40)
(20)
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Utility Capital Revenue and Expense History
Pa
g
e
2
6
1
o
f
3
0
6
Water System
• Supplies - deferred
maintenance at various
facilities, reflects increase cost
of inventory items
•Services –
• Security at intakes,
• WTP controls replacement
• Intertie to SCADA
• Raw water injection vault
• Debt service –
• 2023 bond issuance
(Broadmoor Area)
• low-interest loans that are
reimbursement based.
2018
Actual
2019
Actual
2020
Actual
2021
Actual
2022
Actual
2023
Actual
2024
Estimate
2025
Proposed
2026
Proposed
Debt 1,852,070 2,038,327 2,469,752 1,915,460 1,746,242 2,853,571 3,908,993 4,370,723 4,051,181
Supplies and Services 5,594,439 5,503,632 6,330,078 6,190,685 6,627,100 7,179,288 8,158,445 8,784,748 7,578,147
Salaries and Benefits 1,668,440 1,876,849 2,016,319 1,987,034 2,217,047 2,826,652 3,228,506 3,752,983 3,938,759
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Water Operational Cost History
Pa
g
e
2
6
2
o
f
3
0
6
Irrigation System
• Supplies - spending on mussel
abatement efforts
• Services - rehabilitate two wells
($315K)
• Debt service - 2023 bond
issuance
• Proceeds primarily for
system supply expansion in
Broadmoor Area
2018
Actual
2019
Actual
2020
Actual
2021
Actual
2022
Actual
2023
Actual
2024
Estimate
2025
Proposed
2026
Proposed
Debt -----136,265 509,069 423,750 409,750
Supplies and Services 930,886 808,680 1,113,594 1,165,932 1,185,860 1,424,616 1,744,531 1,355,749 1,410,562
Salaries and Benefits 312,053 348,204 364,883 326,554 385,381 430,893 427,250 492,841 504,809
-
1
1
2
2
3
3
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Irrigation Operational Cost History
Pa
g
e
2
6
3
o
f
3
0
6
Sewer System
• Supplies – reflects addition of three lift
stations, increasing cost of chemicals,
replacement of pumps and switches as
obsolete
• Services - large scale maintenance and
improvements of aging facilities,
• Increased electricity cost
• Rehabilitation related to clarifier, gas
storage membrane, RAS pumps,
etc.
• Debt service - repay low-interest loans
that are reimbursement based
• 2023/2024 budget anticipated
accelerated schedule of loan draw
2018
Actual
2019
Actual
2020
Actual
2021
Actual
2022
Actual
2023
Actual
2024
Estimate
2025
Propose
d
2026
Propose
d
Debt 2,369,996 2,608,491 1,557,298 1,227,259 1,650,622 2,069,802 1,739,955 4,242,325 3,775,698
Supplies and Services 4,063,933 3,860,263 4,224,929 4,458,168 4,833,433 5,231,162 5,203,731 6,522,399 5,890,126
Salaries and Benefits 1,591,752 1,922,401 1,946,615 1,948,113 2,425,150 2,800,503 3,149,169 3,326,636 3,416,865
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Sewer Operational Cost History
Pa
g
e
2
6
4
o
f
3
0
6
Process Water Reuse Facility
• For comparison, budgetary changes
related to operations upon the addition of
Phase Three, Burnham service are not
reflected.
• Supplies decrease based on 2024 cost
experience.
• Services - planned replacement of fresh
water well and repair of piping.
• Debt service –
• 2023 bond issuance
• low-interest loans that are
reimbursement based.
• 2023 refinance of past issuance will
allow lower necessary reserve.
2018
Actual
2019
Actual
2020
Actual
2021
Actual
2022
Actual
2023
Actual
2024
Estimate
2025
Proposed
2026
Proposed
Debt 985,158 860,724 1,724,155 1,930,425 1,849,421 3,258,383 2,871,256 2,750,852 3,744,114
Supplies and Services 1,402,699 1,588,035 3,455,259 2,621,683 2,178,520 2,078,424 2,718,961 2,526,078 2,436,326
Salaries and Benefits 650,783 746,814 698,981 600,005 748,043 869,137 1,121,961 1,173,639 1,204,784
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
PWRF Operational Cost History
Pa
g
e
2
6
5
o
f
3
0
6
Stormwater System
• Supplies - slightly lower in new
biennium based on 2024
• Services- lower in new biennium
based on 2024
• Prior biennium included budget
for partnering with developers
on projects, as well as creation
of a masterplan.
• Debt service –
• 2023 bond issuance
• Improvements in
Broadmoor Area
• Other needed
infrastructure
improvements
2018
Actual
2019
Actual
2020
Actual
2021
Actual
2022
Actual
2023
Actual
2024
Estimate
2025
Proposed
2026
Proposed
Debt -----42,462158,000132,000132,000
Supplies and Services 705,831 616,048 654,503 833,959 1,087,030 1,044,129 1,098,723 806,617 806,617
Salaries and Benefits 601,257 700,632 752,929 941,020 992,533 1,089,605 1,162,219 1,210,407 1,246,719
-
1
1
2
2
3
3
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Stormwater Operational Cost History
Pa
g
e
2
6
6
o
f
3
0
6
Capital Budget Considerations
2025-2026
• Elements included in proposed Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) for years 2025
and 2026
• Rate study included project financing to
replace a portion of depreciating assets
• Of secured funding, 82% is from low-
interest loans ranging between 1% -
1.75%. Remaining supported by bond
proceeds received
• Pursuit to secure funding for those
projects identified as unsecured will
continue
$-
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
Irrigation PWRF Sewer Storm Water
Rate Financed Secured Unsecured
Pa
g
e
2
6
7
o
f
3
0
6
Important Steps
APPROVED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECTS
FOR THE YEARS 2025-2026 ADDED TO BUDGET
PWRF BUDGET UPDATE BASED ON CODE AND
WATER TREATMENT AGREEMENT COMPLETION
IRRIGATION RATE STUDY NEARING COMPLETION –
FUTURE COUNCIL PRESENTATION
2025/2026 BUDGET MUST BE APPROVED BY
COUNCIL NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 31, 2024
Pa
g
e
2
6
8
o
f
3
0
6
Utility Fund Budget Update
Questions?Pa
g
e
2
6
9
o
f
3
0
6
Pasco City Council Meeting
September 9, 2024
Pa
g
e
2
7
0
o
f
3
0
6
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council August 29, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/9/24
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Ordinance - Amending PMC Section 3.40.070 Time of Payment of
Impact Fees (5 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Draft Ordinance
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Impact fees are essential one-time charges imposed by local governments on
new development projects to fund new or expanded public facilities, addressing
the increased demand generated by the development. In Pasco, these fees are
collected specifically for traffic mitigation, parks, and public school facilities,
ensuring that capital projects related to the new developments not only benefit
those developments but also serve the broader community.
Following the 2015 passage of ESSB 5923 by the Washington State
Legislature, which mandated cities and counties to defer the collection of
residential impact fees, the Pasco City Council enacted Ordinance No. 4307 in
2016. This ordinance established a deferral system for the City, providing
developers with a structured mechanism to delay payment of impact fees.
In 2023, the Council further expanded this system through Ordinance No.
4688, broadening eligibility beyond single-family homes to include various
housing types, thus enhancing the accessibility and applicability of the deferral
system.
Page 271 of 306
V. DISCUSSION:
This proposed ordinance to extend the deferral system to include commercial
and industrial projects is a strategic move that will significantly enhance
Pasco’s economic development landscape. By allowing these types of projects
to utilize the deferral system, we can reduce upfront costs for developers,
making it more financially feasible to initiate large-scale commercial and
industrial developments. The fees are deferred until the issuance of the
certificate of occupancy or final inspection. That ensures the payments will be
received before the projects are in operation/occupied.
Staff recommends approving the proposed ordinance to extend the deferral
system to include commercial and industrial projects.
Page 272 of 306
Ordinance – Amending PMC 3.40.070 - 1
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING PASCO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 3.40.070 “TIME OF
PAYMENT OF IMPACT FEE”.
WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature adopted the Growth Management Act,
which authorizes the collection of impact fees on development activity to provide necessary
public facilities that serve new growth and development; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature adopted ESB 5293 in 2015 for counties,
cities, and towns that collect impact fees to adopt a fee deferral process single-family detached
and attached residential construction, which allows applicants to pay impact fees near the end of
the construction process rather than at the beginning; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council adopted Ordinance No 3719 in March 2005
establishing impact fees, including a process for deferring impact fees for single-family
residences; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council adopted Ordinance No. 4688 in November 2023
updating the deferral process for single-family detached and attached residential construction;
and
WHEREAS, the City has decided to expand the deferral process to encompass
commercial and industrial construction as it is expected to stimulate local economic growth.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Section 3.40.070 entitled “Time of Payment of Impact Fee” of the
Pasco Municipal Code is hereby amended and shall read as follows:
3.40.070 Time of Payment of Impact Fee.
(1) All developers shall pay an impact fee in accordance with the provisions of this
chapter at the time that the applicable development permit is available for
issuance.
The impact fee as initially calculated, after issuance of a development permit,
may be recalculated at the time of payment if the development is modified or
conditioned in such a way as to alter the trip generation rate for the
development.
Page 273 of 306
Ordinance – Amending PMC 3.40.070 - 2
No development permit shall be issued until the impact fee is paid, except that
when developers of residential subdivisions, short plats, or planned unit
developments may defer payment until building permits are issued for the lots
within the subdivision, short plat, or planned unit development.
A developer may obtain a preliminary determination of the impact fee before
application for a development permit upon providing the Director of
Community and Economic Development with the information necessary for
processing the application.
Impact fees may be paid under protest in order to obtain a permit or other
approval of development activity.
(2) Deferral of Impact Fees. For each residence construction permit for which any
impact fee deferral is applied for, an administrative fee set in Chapter 3.35 PMC
must simultaneously be paid to the City due to the increased burden placed on
City staff for processing, recording and monitoring such deferrals.
(a) A separate application must be submitted for each residence being
constructed construction permit. Each applicant, in accordance with his or
her contractor registration number or other unique identification number, is
entitled to annually receive deferrals for twenty (20) construction building
permits. The Community & Economic Development Director is authorized
to grant additional deferrals beyond the standard entitlement of twenty (20).
If the City at any time collects impact fees on behalf of one or more school
districts for which the collection of impact fees could be delayed, the City
must consult with the district or districts about the additional deferrals. The
City must give additional weight to recommendations of each applicable
school district regarding the number of deferrals. If the City disagrees with
the recommendations of one or more school districts, the City must provide
the district or districts with a written rationale for its decision.
(b) The period of deferral expires at the earliest of:
(i) The time of final inspection by the City;
(ii) The time of issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the City;
(iii) The time of closing or the first transfer of the property occurring
after the issuance of the applicable building permit; or
(iv) Eighteen months after the building permit is issued by the City.
(c) Final inspection and a certificate of occupancy will not be conducted or
Page 274 of 306
Ordinance – Amending PMC 3.40.070 - 3
issued until payment in full of the impact fees is made. For the first transfer
of the property, the impact fees shall be paid at closing if they have not been
previously paid. Unless an agreement to the contrary is reached between the
buyer and the seller, the payment of impact fees due at closing of a sale
must be made from the seller’s proceeds. In the absence of an agreement to
the contrary, the seller bears strict liability for the payment of the impact
fees.
(d) The applicant for impact fee deferral must grant and record in favor of the
City an impact fee lien in the amount of the deferred impact fee. The lien
must be in a form signed, dated and approved by the City Attorney, and
signed by all owners of the property and persons or entities holding any
interest in the property, with all signatures acknowledged as required for a
deed, and recorded among the appropriate land records of Franklin County.
Proof of such recording shall be submitted to the City before a building
permit may be issued. The lien must specify that it is binding on all
successors in title after the recordation. The lien may specify that it is
subordinate to one mortgage for the purpose of construction upon the same
real property granted by the applicant for impact fee deferral. A mortgage,
deed of trust or other financing mechanism shall be limited to the property
upon which construction of one single-family residence will occur. A lien
not paid when due shall bear interest at the statutory rate. A lien shall
become due at the expiration of the deferral date.
(e) If impact fees are not paid in accordance with this section, the City may
institute foreclosure proceedings in accordance with Chapter 61.12 RCW.
If the City of Pasco does not institute foreclosure proceedings for unpaid
school impact fees within 45 days after receiving notice from a school
district requesting that it do so, the district may institute foreclosure
proceedings with respect to the unpaid school impact fees.
(f) After full payment of impact fees, and upon written request of the person
paying said fees containing the name and address of the requester together
with a copy of a proposed lien release form, the City, upon approval by the
City Attorney, shall sign a lien release and deliver it to the person paying
said fee either in person or by first-class mail. The property owner at the
time of the release, at his or her expense, is responsible for recording the
lien release.
(g) An annual report shall be prepared by the Department of Community and
Economic Development Department evaluating and summarizing the
impact(s) of the deferral program.
Page 275 of 306
Ordinance – Amending PMC 3.40.070 - 4
[Ord. 4688 § 1, 2023; Ord. 4307, 2016; Ord. 3719 § 1, 2005; Code 1970 §
3.132.060.]
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word
of this Ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this
Ordinance.
Section 3. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this Ordinance, including scrivener’s
errors or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or
numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5)
days after approval, passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Published: _____________________________
Page 276 of 306
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 4, 2024
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/9/24
FROM: Ken Roske, Police Chief
Police Department
SUBJECT: AXON Officer Safety Plan Contract Renewal Presentation (15 minutes)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Presentation
AXON Contract Renewal Quote 10 Year Budgetary Estimate
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Captain Brian Vaught will be presenting on the AXON Officer Safety Plan
Contract Renewal.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
For the upcoming biennium budget, if the Pasco Police Department accepts
the proposed 10 year AXON Officer Safety Plan Contract Renewal, the rate will
be $506,136 annually including taxes, and begin to increase in the following
biennium.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
In 2016, the Pasco Police Department (PPD) embarked on a strategic initiative
to enhance transparency and accountability by exploring the deployment of
body-worn cameras (BWC) for its officers. This move was a natural
progression for a department that had already experienced two decades of
success with patrol vehicle dash cameras. Recognizing the advancements in
technology and the growing demand for transparency in law enforcement, the
PPD began a comprehensive evaluation of potential vendors and developed a
policy framework for implementing a BWC program.
By 2018, after thorough consideration, the PPD identified Axon as the industry
leader in body-worn camera technology. The department adopted Axon’s
products, launching the BWC program in early 2019, as an early pioneer of
BWC in police departments across the country. The implementation of this
Page 277 of 306
technology marked a significant milestone for the department, proving
invaluable not only in evidence collection but also in bolstering public trust
through also success program’s transparency. However, increased the
highlighted the growing need for cloud-based evidence storage, as the volume
of video data quickly approached the limits set in the initial contract. This
prompted a reevaluation of the department's storage needs, ultimately leading
to the proposal of an enhanced Officer Safety Plan, which promised unlimited
evidence storage and higher-resolution video capabilities.
The PPD’s partnership with Axon extended beyond BWCs to include the Taser
Conducted PPD first had the Weapon program, (CEW) Electrical which
the advancements, technological Axon’s 2007. in implemented With
department faced the need to upgrade to the Taser 7 model, which offered
seamless integration with the BWC system, ensuring automatic recording
during critical incidents. This upgrade was part of a broader effort to unify the
department’s digital evidence management, transitioning from the Watch guard
in-car video system to the Axon Fleet Camera System. This integration aimed
to streamline the storage and processing of digital evidence, thereby reducing
the potential for errors in public records requests.
The to department’s the central Evidence.com platform Axon became
operations, enabling the secure storage and sharing of digital evidence with
legal stakeholders. The platform’s features, including Axon Citizen and Axon
Capture, further empowered officers to collect and manage digital evidence
efficiently. The Axon Interview system also modernized the department’s
interview rooms, linking them directly to the Evidence.com database for real-
time viewing and streamlined data management.
The current Axon contract represents a significant investment in the PPD’s
future. It encompassed a approach to officer safety, evidence holistic
management, and public transparency, ensuring that the PPD remained at the
forefront of law enforcement technology and public accountability. This contract
was not merely a continuation of existing practices but a forward-looking
strategy capabilities maintain and its PPD’s the enhance to operational
leadership in digital evidence management and public trust.
V. DISCUSSION:
The PPD is negotiating a new contract with Axon, aiming to integrate advanced
technologies that will enhance officer safety and operational efficiency. Central
to this new contract is upgrading the Taser 10, which offers improved accuracy
and the effectiveness in de-escalation scenarios. This move reflects
department's commitment to equipping its officers with state-of-the-art tools to
manage confrontations safely and effectively.
Page 278 of 306
In addition to the Taser 10, the PPD plans to implement the Fleet 3 in- car
camera system, which will provide high-definition video capture with enhanced
features such as automatic license plate recognition. This system is expected
to improve transparency and accountability in police operations significantly.
Another critical component of the contract is the Draft 1 artificial intelligence
report assistant, designed to streamline report writing by providing officers with
AI-driven suggestions, thereby reducing administrative burdens and allowing
more time for community and data-driven policing strategies.
The contract also includes unlimited third-party storage and the integration of
the Fusus real-time crime center. The former ensures that all data, including
video and audio recordings, can be securely stored without limitations,
ensuring cost mitigation of storage. At the same time, the latter offers a
platform the enhancing coordination, and for crime real-time monitoring
department's ability to respond swiftly to incidents in real time. Additionally,
Axon VR training will provide immersive, scenario-based training for officers,
promoting better decision-making in the field, while reducing training costs.
Moreover, the new contract will feature Axon Auto Transcription and Axon
Community Request. Axon Auto Transcription will automate the transcription of
recorded interviews and interactions, reducing administrative tasks for officers.
The enhance the will significantly Request Community Axon feature
department's ability to engage with the public by allowing officers to easily
collect digital evidence from the community through a custom-built portal. This
portal enables citizens to submit photos, videos, and other relevant information
directly to the police, with all submissions managed and stored securely
through Axon Evidence. This addition is a key step in fostering a more
collaborative relationship between the police and the public, empowering the
community to play an active role in public safety without jeopardizing personal
data on their phones.
Locking in the Axon contract for 10 years offers a significant financial
annual average the avoiding and current securing by advantage pricing
increase of 4%. Over the course of a decade, this means substantial savings
compared to the alternative of renegotiating or renewing at future, higher rates.
By locking in now, the City ensures cost stability and predictability, protecting
the PPD from rising costs while maintaining access to essential technology and
services. This long-term commitment is a strategic investment in both fiscal
responsibility and operational efficiency.
Together, forward these upgrades reflect the Pasco Police Department's
looking approach to law enforcement, focusing on technology-driven solutions
to enhance service delivery, transparency, and public trust.
Page 279 of 306
Pasco City Council Meeting
September 9, 2024
Pa
g
e
2
8
0
o
f
3
0
6
Officer Safety Plan
Respond
Capture De-escalate
Manage
TASER Energy Weapons
Axon Signal Vehicle Unit
Axon Respond
Axon Body Cameras
Axon Community Request
Axon Capture
TASER Energy Weapons
Axon VR Training
Axon Evidence
Axon Performance
Redaction
Assistant
Auto-Tagging
Axon Investigate
Pa
g
e
2
8
1
o
f
3
0
6
OSP 10+ discount
Total 10-year savings
for 112 officers
$3,376,084.24
In savings
~33%
Officer Safety Plan
TASER 10 Auto Tagging
Axon Body 4 and Respond +Channel Services
Draft 1 My 90
Axon Records Unlimited 3rd Party Storage
Axon Standards Axon VR Training
Axon Evidence Axon Auto Transcribe
Axon Performance Third Party Video Playback
Axon Community Request Axon Investigate
Redaction Assistant Fusus
Pa
g
e
2
8
2
o
f
3
0
6
Axon Respond +
Live-
streaming
Live maps
Remote
evidence
upload
Pa
g
e
2
8
3
o
f
3
0
6
TASER 10
45-foot maximum range
10 individually targeted probes
Any-probe connect
Audible and visual warning alert
Integration with Axon VR
Enhanced weather resistance
Pa
g
e
2
8
4
o
f
3
0
6
Fleet 3
Dual-View Camera
• Wide-angle and narrow-view cameras
• Edge AI processing in camera
• 12x digital zoom
• Can be mounted in front or rear windows
Hub
• Powers and handles data transmission from
cameras
• Stores all evidence securely
• Automatic wireless upload
through Cradlepoint router (LTE,WiFi)
• 240GB and 1.8TB SSD storage options
Interior Camera
• Color camera in light conditions
• Infrared illumination for night view
• Knee-to-head occupant visibility
• Can be used for transport and side windows
Dashboard App
•Available for Windows and Android (DeX)
•Interface for control, preview and
tagging evidence for Fleet and BWC
•ALPR hotlist notification and response
Exterior Camera
• Reliable exterior footage capture
•Rugged durability to withstand the
elements
•Flexible mounting options
Real-Time Connectivity
•Alerts
•Live maps of vehicle location
•Live-streaming
Pa
g
e
2
8
5
o
f
3
0
6
Fleet 3 Integrated ALPR
8X more plate reads for the same spend
Full-featured mobile ALPR
Deep search integrations with Flock Safety fixed ALPR
system
Key features
•Ethical design framework with
security and privacy controls
•Paper plates
and covered plates (Flock)
•3+ lanes covered by a single
RGB camera
•Alerting: receive notifications for
specific plates
•Toggle alerts on/off for specific
categories, configurable
retention
Pa
g
e
2
8
6
o
f
3
0
6
Draft One
Report Writing
FORCE MULTIPLY
YOUR OFFICERS
For every 8 officers who save an
hour per shift on paperwork,
your agency gains the
equivalent of an extra 8-hour
shift in the field.
INCREASE AND IMPROVE
CALLS FOR SERVICE
More time for responding to
calls where officers are
motivated to record all
interactions and speak with
clarity to community members.
REDUCE BURNOUT
AND TURNOVER
Officers will spend less time on
paperwork and more time
doing meaningful work, like
keeping communities safe.
GENERATE HIGHER
QUALITY REPORTS
Grammatically correct drafts
with concise summaries for
supervisors, the justice system
and other key reviewers.
Pa
g
e
2
8
7
o
f
3
0
6
Axon Community Request
Individual invitations
Public portals
Triage tools
Secure audit trails
Axon Evidence integration
Pa
g
e
2
8
8
o
f
3
0
6
FUSUS Realtime Crime Center
Pa
g
e
2
8
9
o
f
3
0
6
Pasco City Council Meeting
September 9, 2024
Pa
g
e
2
9
0
o
f
3
0
6
Page 1 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Q-588250-45532.693MD
Issued: 08/28/2024
Quote Expiration: 09/28/2024
Estimated Contract Start Date: 02/01/2025
Account Number: 186872
Payment Terms: N30
Delivery Method:
SHIP TO BILL TO SALES REPRESENTATIVE PRIMARY CONTACT
Pasco Police Dept. - WA
215 W Sylvester St
Pasco,
WA
99301-5350
USA
Pasco Police Dept. - WA
215 W Sylvester St
Pasco
WA
99301-5350
USA
Email:
Matthew Dufford
Phone: 7074802550
Email: mdufford@axon.com
Fax:
WILLIAM PARRAMORE
Phone: 5097278529
Email: parramorew@pasco-wa.gov
Fax: (509) 545-3423
Quote Summary Discount Summary
Program Length 120 Months Average Savings Per Year $337,608.42
TOTAL COST $6,275,972.56
ESTIMATED TOTAL W/ TAX $6,748,552.72 TOTAL SAVINGS $3,376,084.24
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
17800 N 85th St.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85255
United States
VAT: 86-0741227
Domestic: (800) 978-2737
International: +1.800.978.2737
Pa
g
e
2
9
1
o
f
3
0
6
Page 2 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Payment Summary
Date Subtotal Tax Total
Jan 2025 $470,213.56 $35,474.01 $505,687.57
Jan 2026 $470,697.96 $35,437.91 $506,135.87
Jan 2027 $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2028 $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2029 $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2030 $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2031 $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2032 $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2033 $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2034 $666,882.63 $50,208.60 $717,091.23
Total $6,275,972.56 $472,580.16 $6,748,552.72
Pa
g
e
2
9
2
o
f
3
0
6
Page 3 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Quote Unbundled Price:$9,652,056.80
Quote List Price:$7,686,269.60
Quote Subtotal:$6,275,972.56
Pricing
All deliverables are detailed in Delivery Schedules section lower in proposal
Item Description Qty Term Unbundled List Price Net Price Subtotal Tax Total
Program
100553 TRANSFER CREDIT - SOFTWARE AND SERVICES 1 $1.00 ($13,563.00)($13,563.00)($1,207.11)($14,770.11)
100552 TRANSFER CREDIT - GOODS 1 $1.00 $49,681.00 $49,681.00 $4,421.61 $54,102.61
M00015 BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 98 120 $549.65 $390.20 $333.17 $3,918,079.20 $297,439.42 $4,215,518.62
Fleet3A10Yr Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 54 120 $262.52 $248.53 $174.44 $1,130,371.20 $77,179.58 $1,207,550.78
A la Carte Hardware
71210 AXON FLEET - DOOR TRIGGER HARDWARE - US 8 $18.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
50322 AXON INTERVIEW - TOUCH PANEL PRO 4 $3,286.23 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
74056 AXON INTERVIEW - TOUCH PANEL WALL MOUNT 4 $64.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
74116 AXON INTERVIEW - ENCLOSURE - FLUSH MOUNT 3 $132.00 $132.00 $396.00 $35.25 $431.25
50118 AXON INTERVIEW - MIC - WIRED (STANDARD MIC)3 $243.31 $243.31 $729.93 $64.97 $794.90
50114 AXON INTERVIEW - CAMERA - COVERT SENSOR 3 $397.51 $397.51 $1,192.53 $106.13 $1,298.66
50218 AXON INTERVIEW - CAMERA - COVERT MAIN UNIT 3 $685.49 $685.49 $2,056.47 $183.03 $2,239.50
50118 AXON INTERVIEW - MIC - WIRED (STANDARD MIC)5 $243.31 $243.31 $1,216.55 $108.28 $1,324.83
50298 AXON INTERVIEW - CAMERA - OVERT DOME 5 $992.92 $992.92 $4,964.60 $441.85 $5,406.45
H00001 AB4 Camera Bundle 5 $849.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
H00002 AB4 Multi Bay Dock Bundle 2 $1,638.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 120 $3,363.00 $12.50 $81,000.00 $7,206.59 $88,206.59
H00001 AB4 Camera Bundle 4 $849.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
A la Carte Software
50043 AXON INTERVIEW - STREAMING SERVER
MAINTENANCE - PER SERVER 2 120 $36.83 $36.83 $8,839.20 $786.69 $9,625.89
50039 AXON INTERVIEW - CLIENT SOFTWARE - MAINT. PER
TOUCH PANEL 4 120 $31.50 $28.67 $13,759.20 $1,224.57 $14,983.77
50045 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - INTERVIEW ROOM
UNLIMITED 8 120 $124.80 $124.80 $119,808.00 $0.00 $119,808.00
101283 AXON RECORDS - DRAFT ONE - AI-ASSISTED REPORT
WRITING 98 120 $78.76 $69.31 $815,071.88 $72,541.39 $887,613.27
ProLicense Pro License Bundle 20 120 $48.47 $48.02 $115,248.00 $10,257.07 $125,505.07
A la Carte Services
85055 AXON BODY - PSO - FULL SERVICE 1 $40,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4 $849.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4 $849.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4 $849.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4 $849.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4 $849.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
100682 AXON INTERVIEW - PSO - SITE VISIT 4 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $7,000.00 $0.00 $7,000.00
101267 AXON VR - PSO - FULL INSTALLATION 1 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $1,068.00 $13,068.00
A la Carte Warranties
73390 AXON FLEET - CRADLEPOINT ROUTER TRANSFERRED
WARRANTY 40 24 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
73390 AXON FLEET - CRADLEPOINT ROUTER TRANSFERRED
WARRANTY 6 36 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Pa
g
e
2
9
3
o
f
3
0
6
Page 4 Q-588250-45532.693MD
73390 AXON FLEET - CRADLEPOINT ROUTER TRANSFERRED
WARRANTY 6 24 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
80466 AXON BODY - TAP WARRANTY - SINGLE BAY DOCK 2 29 $4.40 $4.40 $255.20 $22.71 $277.91
80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 3 36 $7.75 $7.75 $837.00 $74.50 $911.50
50448 AXON INTERVIEW - EXT WARRANTY 4 60 $29.29 $29.29 $7,029.60 $625.63 $7,655.23
Total $6,275,972.56 $472,580.16 $6,748,552.72
Delivery Schedule
Hardware
Bundle Item Description QTY Shipping Location Estimated Delivery Date
AB4 Camera Bundle 100147 AXON BODY 4 - CAMERA - NA US FIRST RESPONDER BLK
RAPIDLOCK 4 1 01/01/2025
AB4 Camera Bundle 100147 AXON BODY 4 - CAMERA - NA US FIRST RESPONDER BLK
RAPIDLOCK 5 1 01/01/2025
AB4 Camera Bundle 100466 AXON BODY 4 - CABLE - USB-C TO USB-C 6 1 01/01/2025
AB4 Camera Bundle 100466 AXON BODY 4 - CABLE - USB-C TO USB-C 5 1 01/01/2025
AB4 Camera Bundle 74028 AXON BODY - MOUNT - WING CLIP RAPIDLOCK 6 1 01/01/2025
AB4 Camera Bundle 74028 AXON BODY - MOUNT - WING CLIP RAPIDLOCK 5 1 01/01/2025
AB4 Multi Bay Dock Bundle 100206 AXON BODY 4 - 8 BAY DOCK 2 1 01/01/2025
AB4 Multi Bay Dock Bundle 70033 AXON - DOCK WALL MOUNT - BRACKET ASSY 2 1 01/01/2025
AB4 Multi Bay Dock Bundle 71019 AXON BODY - DOCK POWERCORD - NORTH AMERICA 2 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100126 AXON VR - TACTICAL BAG 4 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100390 AXON TASER 10 - HANDLE - YELLOW CLASS 3R 3 2 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100390 AXON TASER 10 - HANDLE - YELLOW CLASS 3R 98 2 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100393 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - LIVE DUTY BLACK 98 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100393 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - LIVE DUTY BLACK 3 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100394 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - HALT TRAINING BLUE 8 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100395 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - LIVE TRAINING PURPLE 6 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100396 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - INERT RED 30 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 1960 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 590 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100401 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - INERT 300 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100616 AXON TASER 10 - HOLSTER - BLACKHAWK - RH 89 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100617 AXON TASER 10 - HOLSTER - BLACKHAWK - LH 9 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100623 AXON TASER - TRAINING - ENHANCED HALT SUIT V2 2 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100748 AXON VR - CONTROLLER - TASER 10 4 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100832 AXON VR - CONTROLLER - HANDGUN VR19H 4 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101124 AXON VR - HOLSTER - T10 BLACKHAWK GREY - RH 3 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101125 AXON VR - HOLSTER - T10 BLACKHAWK GREY - LH 1 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101294 AXON VR - TABLET 4 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101300 AXON VR - TABLET CASE 4 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101386 AXON RESPOND - FUSUSCORE - PRO 2.0 4TB HDD STORAGE 4 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101391 AXON RESPOND - FUSUSCORE - ELITE AI 2.0 44TB HDD
STORAGE 1 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101408 AXON RESPOND - FUSUSCORE - CAD 1 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 20018 AXON TASER - BATTERY PACK - TACTICAL 98 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 20018 AXON TASER - BATTERY PACK - TACTICAL 17 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 20018 AXON TASER - BATTERY PACK - TACTICAL 3 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 20378 AXON VR - HEADSET - HTC FOCUS 3 4 1 01/01/2025
Pa
g
e
2
9
4
o
f
3
0
6
Page 5 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Hardware
Bundle Item Description QTY Shipping Location Estimated Delivery Date
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 70033 AXON - DOCK WALL MOUNT - BRACKET ASSY 1 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 71019 AXON BODY - DOCK POWERCORD - NORTH AMERICA 1 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 74200 AXON TASER - DOCK - SIX BAY PLUS CORE 1 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 80087 AXON TASER - TARGET - CONDUCTIVE PROFESSIONAL
RUGGEDIZED 2 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 80090 AXON TASER - TARGET FRAME - PROFESSIONAL 27.5 IN X 75
IN 2 1 01/01/2025
CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 100146 AXON FLEET - CRADLEPOINT R1900-5GB-GA+5YR
NETCLOUD 54 1 01/01/2025
CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 71203 AXON FLEET - AIRGAIN ANT - 7-IN-1 4LTE/5G 2WIFI 1GNSS BL 54 1 01/01/2025
CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 72048 AXON FLEET 3 - SIM INSERTION - ATT 54 1 01/01/2025
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 70112 AXON SIGNAL - SIGNAL UNIT 54 1 01/01/2025
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 72036 AXON FLEET 3 - STANDARD 2 CAMERA KIT 54 1 01/01/2025
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 72036 AXON FLEET 3 - STANDARD 2 CAMERA KIT 1 1 01/01/2025
A la Carte 50114 AXON INTERVIEW - CAMERA - COVERT SENSOR 3 1 01/01/2025
A la Carte 50118 AXON INTERVIEW - MIC - WIRED (STANDARD MIC)5 1 01/01/2025
A la Carte 50118 AXON INTERVIEW - MIC - WIRED (STANDARD MIC)3 1 01/01/2025
A la Carte 50218 AXON INTERVIEW - CAMERA - COVERT MAIN UNIT 3 1 01/01/2025
A la Carte 50298 AXON INTERVIEW - CAMERA - OVERT DOME 5 1 01/01/2025
A la Carte 50322 AXON INTERVIEW - TOUCH PANEL PRO 4 1 01/01/2025
A la Carte 71210 AXON FLEET - DOOR TRIGGER HARDWARE - US 8 1 01/01/2025
A la Carte 74056 AXON INTERVIEW - TOUCH PANEL WALL MOUNT 4 1 01/01/2025
A la Carte 74116 AXON INTERVIEW - ENCLOSURE - FLUSH MOUNT 3 1 01/01/2025
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 300 1 01/01/2026
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 790 1 01/01/2026
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 290 1 01/01/2027
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 780 1 01/01/2027
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100210 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 1 - TABLET 4 1 07/02/2027
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101009 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 1 - SIDEARM CONTROLLER 4 1 07/02/2027
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101012 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 1 - CONTROLLER 4 1 07/02/2027
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 20373 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 1 - HEADSET 4 1 07/02/2027
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73309 AXON BODY - TAP REFRESH 1 - CAMERA 101 1 07/02/2027
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73313 AXON BODY - TAP REFRESH 1 - DOCK SINGLE BAY 23 1 07/02/2027
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73689 AXON BODY - TAP REFRESH 1 - DOCK MULTI BAY 10 1 07/02/2027
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 300 1 01/01/2028
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 790 1 01/01/2028
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 290 1 01/01/2029
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 780 1 01/01/2029
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100211 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 2 - TABLET 4 1 01/01/2030
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101010 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 2 - SIDEARM CONTROLLER 4 1 01/01/2030
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101013 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 2 - CONTROLLER 4 1 01/01/2030
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 20374 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 2 - HEADSET 4 1 01/01/2030
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73310 AXON BODY - TAP REFRESH 2 - CAMERA 101 1 01/01/2030
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73314 AXON BODY - TAP REFRESH 2 - DOCK SINGLE BAY 23 1 01/01/2030
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73688 AXON BODY - TAP REFRESH 2 - DOCK MULTI BAY 10 1 01/01/2030
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 72040 AXON FLEET - TAP REFRESH 1 - 2 CAMERA KIT 54 1 01/01/2030
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 72040 AXON FLEET - TAP REFRESH 1 - 2 CAMERA KIT 1 1 01/01/2030
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 20242 AXON TASER - CERTIFICATION PROGRAM YEAR 6-10
HARDWARE 98 1 07/02/2030
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100212 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 3 - TABLET 4 1 07/02/2032
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101011 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 3 - SIDEARM CONTROLLER 4 1 07/02/2032
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101014 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 3 - CONTROLLER 4 1 07/02/2032
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 20375 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 3 - HEADSET 4 1 07/02/2032
Pa
g
e
2
9
5
o
f
3
0
6
Page 6 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Hardware
Bundle Item Description QTY Shipping Location Estimated Delivery Date
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73317 AXON BODY - TAP REFRESH 3 - DOCK SINGLE BAY 23 1 07/02/2032
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73345 AXON BODY - TAP REFRESH 3 - CAMERA 101 1 07/02/2032
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73347 AXON BODY - TAP REFRESH 3 - DOCK MULTI BAY 10 1 07/02/2032
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73318 AXON BODY - TAP REFRESH 4 - DOCK SINGLE BAY 23 1 01/01/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73346 AXON BODY - TAP REFRESH 4 - CAMERA 101 1 01/01/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73348 AXON BODY - TAP REFRESH 4 - DOCK MULTI BAY 10 1 01/01/2035
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 100092 AXON FLEET - TAP REFRESH 2 - 2 CAMERA KIT 54 1 01/01/2035
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 100092 AXON FLEET - TAP REFRESH 2 - 2 CAMERA KIT 1 1 01/01/2035
Software
Bundle Item Description QTY Estimated Start Date Estimated End Date
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100165 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - THIRD PARTY UNLIMITED 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100590 AXON MY90 - LICENSE 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100801 AXON RECORDS - OSP LICENSE 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101180 AXON TASER - DATA SCIENCE PROGRAM 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101357 AXON RESPOND - FUSUSONE - BASIC LEVEL SAAS 1 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 20248 AXON TASER - EVIDENCE.COM LICENSE 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 20248 AXON TASER - EVIDENCE.COM LICENSE 1 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 20370 AXON VR - FULL ACCESS - TASER ADD-ON USER 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73478 AXON EVIDENCE - REDACTION ASSISTANT USER LICENSE 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73618 AXON COMMUNITY REQUEST 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73638 AXON STANDARDS - LICENSE 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73680 AXON RESPOND PLUS - LICENSE 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73682 AXON EVIDENCE - AUTO TAGGING LICENSE 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73686 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - UNLIMITED (AXON DEVICE)98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73739 AXON PERFORMANCE - LICENSE 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 73746 AXON EVIDENCE - ECOM LICENSE - PRO 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 85760 AXON AUTO-TRANSCRIBE - UNLIMITED SERVICE 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 80400 AXON EVIDENCE - FLEET VEHICLE LICENSE 54 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 80401 AXON FLEET 3 - ALPR LICENSE - 1 CAMERA 54 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 80402 AXON RESPOND - LICENSE - FLEET 3 54 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 80410 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - FLEET 1 CAMERA UNLIMITED 108 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
Pro License Bundle 73683 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - 10GB A LA CARTE 60 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
Pro License Bundle 73746 AXON EVIDENCE - ECOM LICENSE - PRO 20 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
A la Carte 101283 AXON RECORDS - DRAFT ONE - AI-ASSISTED REPORT
WRITING 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
A la Carte 50039 AXON INTERVIEW - CLIENT SOFTWARE - MAINT. PER TOUCH
PANEL 4 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
A la Carte 50043 AXON INTERVIEW - STREAMING SERVER MAINTENANCE -
PER SERVER 2 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
A la Carte 50045 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - INTERVIEW ROOM UNLIMITED 8 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
Services
Bundle Item Description QTY
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100105 AXON MY90 - PSO - SETUP 1
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100751 AXON TASER 10 - REPLACEMENT ACCESS PROGRAM - DUTY CARTRIDGE 98
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101184 AXON INVESTIGATE - TRAINING - OPERATOR AND EXAMINER 7
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101193 AXON TASER - ON DEMAND CERTIFICATION 1
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101421 AXON RESPOND - FUSUS SOFTWARE IMPLEMENTATION 1
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 11642 AXON INVESTIGATE - THIRD PARTY VIDEO SUPPORT 98
Pa
g
e
2
9
6
o
f
3
0
6
Page 7 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Services
Bundle Item Description QTY
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 73392 AXON FLEET 3 - INSTALLATION - UPGRADE (PER VEHICLE)54
A la Carte 100682 AXON INTERVIEW - PSO - SITE VISIT 4
A la Carte 101267 AXON VR - PSO - FULL INSTALLATION 1
A la Carte 85055 AXON BODY - PSO - FULL SERVICE 1
A la Carte 99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4
A la Carte 99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4
A la Carte 99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4
A la Carte 99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4
A la Carte 99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4
Warranties
Bundle Item Description QTY Estimated Start Date Estimated End Date
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 80464 AXON BODY - TAP WARRANTY - CAMERA 98 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 80464 AXON BODY - TAP WARRANTY - CAMERA 3 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 80465 AXON BODY - TAP WARRANTY - MULTI BAY DOCK 10 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 80466 AXON BODY - TAP WARRANTY - SINGLE BAY DOCK 23 02/01/2025 01/31/2035
A la Carte 50448 AXON INTERVIEW - EXT WARRANTY 4 02/01/2025 01/31/2030
A la Carte 73390 AXON FLEET - CRADLEPOINT ROUTER TRANSFERRED WARRANTY 6 02/01/2025 01/17/2027
A la Carte 73390 AXON FLEET - CRADLEPOINT ROUTER TRANSFERRED WARRANTY 6 02/01/2025 01/31/2028
A la Carte 73390 AXON FLEET - CRADLEPOINT ROUTER TRANSFERRED WARRANTY 40 02/01/2025 01/17/2027
A la Carte 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 3 02/01/2025 01/31/2028
A la Carte 80466 AXON BODY - TAP WARRANTY - SINGLE BAY DOCK 2 02/01/2025 06/30/2027
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100197 AXON VR - EXT WARRANTY - HTC FOCUS 3 HEADSET 4 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100213 AXON VR - EXT WARRANTY - TABLET 4 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100704 AXON TASER 10 - EXT WARRANTY - HANDLE 98 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 100704 AXON TASER 10 - EXT WARRANTY - HANDLE 3 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101007 AXON VR - EXT WARRANTY - CONTROLLER 4 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101008 AXON VR - EXT WARRANTY - HANDGUN CONTROLLER 4 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101424 AXON RESPOND - FUSUSCORE - EXTENDED WARRANTY 1 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101424 AXON RESPOND - FUSUSCORE - EXTENDED WARRANTY 4 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 101424 AXON RESPOND - FUSUSCORE - EXTENDED WARRANTY 1 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 80374 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - BATTERY PACK T7/T10 3 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 80374 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - BATTERY PACK T7/T10 98 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 80374 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - BATTERY PACK T7/T10 17 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 1 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 80379 AXON SIGNAL - EXT WARRANTY - SIGNAL UNIT 54 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 80495 AXON FLEET 3 - EXT WARRANTY - 2 CAMERA KIT 54 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 80495 AXON FLEET 3 - EXT WARRANTY - 2 CAMERA KIT 1 01/01/2026 01/31/2035
Pa
g
e
2
9
7
o
f
3
0
6
Page 8 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Shipping Locations
Location Number Street City State Zip Country
1 215 W Sylvester St Pasco WA 99301-5350 USA
2 215 W Sylvester St Pasco WA 99301-5350 USA
Payment Details
Jan 2025
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Fleet - Annual Payment 1 Fleet3A10Yr Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 54 $84,777.85 $5,788.47 $90,566.32
Fleet - Annual Payment 1 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $6,072.98 $540.49 $6,613.47
IR - Annual Payment 1 50039 AXON INTERVIEW - CLIENT SOFTWARE - MAINT. PER TOUCH PANEL 4 $1,031.94 $91.84 $1,123.78
IR - Annual Payment 1 50043 AXON INTERVIEW - STREAMING SERVER MAINTENANCE - PER SERVER 2 $662.94 $59.00 $721.94
IR - Annual Payment 1 50045 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - INTERVIEW ROOM UNLIMITED 8 $8,985.56 $0.00 $8,985.56
IR - Annual Payment 1 50448 AXON INTERVIEW - EXT WARRANTY 4 $527.22 $46.92 $574.14
OSP - Annual Payment 1 101283 AXON RECORDS - DRAFT ONE - AI-ASSISTED REPORT WRITING 98 $50,798.61 $4,521.07 $55,319.68
OSP - Annual Payment 1 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 3 $52.17 $4.64 $56.81
OSP - Annual Payment 1 M00015 BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 98 $244,190.61 $18,537.60 $262,728.21
OSP - Annual Payment 1 ProLicense Pro License Bundle 20 $7,182.72 $639.26 $7,821.98
OSP - Annual Payment 1 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $1.68 $0.00 $1.68
Upfront Hardware + PSO 100682 AXON INTERVIEW - PSO - SITE VISIT 4 $7,000.00 $0.00 $7,000.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 101267 AXON VR - PSO - FULL INSTALLATION 1 $12,000.00 $1,068.00 $13,068.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 50114 AXON INTERVIEW - CAMERA - COVERT SENSOR 3 $1,192.53 $106.13 $1,298.66
Upfront Hardware + PSO 50118 AXON INTERVIEW - MIC - WIRED (STANDARD MIC)3 $729.93 $64.97 $794.90
Upfront Hardware + PSO 50118 AXON INTERVIEW - MIC - WIRED (STANDARD MIC)5 $1,216.55 $108.28 $1,324.83
Upfront Hardware + PSO 50218 AXON INTERVIEW - CAMERA - COVERT MAIN UNIT 3 $2,056.47 $183.03 $2,239.50
Upfront Hardware + PSO 50298 AXON INTERVIEW - CAMERA - OVERT DOME 5 $4,964.60 $441.85 $5,406.45
Upfront Hardware + PSO 50322 AXON INTERVIEW - TOUCH PANEL PRO 4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 71210 AXON FLEET - DOOR TRIGGER HARDWARE - US 8 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 73390 AXON FLEET - CRADLEPOINT ROUTER TRANSFERRED WARRANTY 40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 73390 AXON FLEET - CRADLEPOINT ROUTER TRANSFERRED WARRANTY 6 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 73390 AXON FLEET - CRADLEPOINT ROUTER TRANSFERRED WARRANTY 6 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 74056 AXON INTERVIEW - TOUCH PANEL WALL MOUNT 4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 74116 AXON INTERVIEW - ENCLOSURE - FLUSH MOUNT 3 $396.00 $35.25 $431.25
Upfront Hardware + PSO 80466 AXON BODY - TAP WARRANTY - SINGLE BAY DOCK 2 $255.20 $22.71 $277.91
Upfront Hardware + PSO 85055 AXON BODY - PSO - FULL SERVICE 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO 99901 AXON ACCELERATE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO H00001 AB4 Camera Bundle 5 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO H00001 AB4 Camera Bundle 4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Upfront Hardware + PSO H00002 AB4 Multi Bay Dock Bundle 2 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Invoice Upon Fulfillment 100552 TRANSFER CREDIT - GOODS 1 $49,681.00 $4,421.61 $54,102.61
Invoice Upon Fulfillment 100553 TRANSFER CREDIT - SOFTWARE AND SERVICES 1 ($13,563.00)($1,207.11)($14,770.11)
Total $470,213.56 $35,474.01 $505,687.57
Pa
g
e
2
9
8
o
f
3
0
6
Page 9 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Feb 2025
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Invoice Upon Fulfillment M00015 BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 98 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Jan 2026
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Fleet - Annual Payment 2 Fleet3A10Yr Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 54 $84,777.83 $5,788.47 $90,566.30
Fleet - Annual Payment 2 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $6,072.98 $540.49 $6,613.47
IR - Annual Payment 2 50039 AXON INTERVIEW - CLIENT SOFTWARE - MAINT. PER TOUCH PANEL 4 $1,031.94 $91.84 $1,123.78
IR - Annual Payment 2 50043 AXON INTERVIEW - STREAMING SERVER MAINTENANCE - PER SERVER 2 $662.94 $59.00 $721.94
IR - Annual Payment 2 50045 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - INTERVIEW ROOM UNLIMITED 8 $8,985.60 $0.00 $8,985.60
IR - Annual Payment 2 50448 AXON INTERVIEW - EXT WARRANTY 4 $527.22 $46.92 $574.14
OSP - Annual Payment 2 101283 AXON RECORDS - DRAFT ONE - AI-ASSISTED REPORT WRITING 98 $61,961.48 $5,514.57 $67,476.05
OSP - Annual Payment 2 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 3 $63.63 $5.66 $69.29
OSP - Annual Payment 2 M00015 BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 98 $297,851.17 $22,611.22 $320,462.39
OSP - Annual Payment 2 ProLicense Pro License Bundle 20 $8,761.12 $779.74 $9,540.86
OSP - Annual Payment 2 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $2.05 $0.00 $2.05
Total $470,697.96 $35,437.91 $506,135.87
Jan 2027
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Fleet - Annual Payment 3 Fleet3A10Yr Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 54 $120,101.94 $8,200.34 $128,302.28
Fleet - Annual Payment 3 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $8,603.38 $765.70 $9,369.08
IR - Annual Payment 3 50039 AXON INTERVIEW - CLIENT SOFTWARE - MAINT. PER TOUCH PANEL 4 $1,461.92 $130.11 $1,592.03
IR - Annual Payment 3 50043 AXON INTERVIEW - STREAMING SERVER MAINTENANCE - PER SERVER 2 $939.16 $83.59 $1,022.75
IR - Annual Payment 3 50045 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - INTERVIEW ROOM UNLIMITED 8 $12,729.60 $0.00 $12,729.60
IR - Annual Payment 3 50448 AXON INTERVIEW - EXT WARRANTY 4 $746.90 $66.47 $813.37
OSP - Annual Payment 3 101283 AXON RECORDS - DRAFT ONE - AI-ASSISTED REPORT WRITING 98 $87,789.01 $7,813.22 $95,602.23
OSP - Annual Payment 3 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 3 $90.15 $8.02 $98.17
OSP - Annual Payment 3 M00015 BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 98 $422,004.64 $32,036.31 $454,040.95
OSP - Annual Payment 3 ProLicense Pro License Bundle 20 $12,413.02 $1,104.76 $13,517.78
OSP - Annual Payment 3 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $2.91 $0.00 $2.91
Total $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2028
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Fleet - Annual Payment 4 Fleet3A10Yr Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 54 $120,101.94 $8,200.34 $128,302.28
Fleet - Annual Payment 4 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $8,603.38 $765.70 $9,369.08
IR - Annual Payment 4 50039 AXON INTERVIEW - CLIENT SOFTWARE - MAINT. PER TOUCH PANEL 4 $1,461.92 $130.11 $1,592.03
IR - Annual Payment 4 50043 AXON INTERVIEW - STREAMING SERVER MAINTENANCE - PER SERVER 2 $939.16 $83.59 $1,022.75
IR - Annual Payment 4 50045 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - INTERVIEW ROOM UNLIMITED 8 $12,729.60 $0.00 $12,729.60
IR - Annual Payment 4 50448 AXON INTERVIEW - EXT WARRANTY 4 $746.90 $66.47 $813.37
OSP - Annual Payment 4 101283 AXON RECORDS - DRAFT ONE - AI-ASSISTED REPORT WRITING 98 $87,789.01 $7,813.22 $95,602.23
OSP - Annual Payment 4 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 3 $90.15 $8.02 $98.17
OSP - Annual Payment 4 M00015 BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 98 $422,004.64 $32,036.31 $454,040.95
OSP - Annual Payment 4 ProLicense Pro License Bundle 20 $12,413.02 $1,104.76 $13,517.78
OSP - Annual Payment 4 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $2.91 $0.00 $2.91
Total $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Pa
g
e
2
9
9
o
f
3
0
6
Page 10 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Jan 2029
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Fleet - Annual Payment 5 Fleet3A10Yr Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 54 $120,101.94 $8,200.34 $128,302.28
Fleet - Annual Payment 5 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $8,603.38 $765.70 $9,369.08
IR - Annual Payment 5 50039 AXON INTERVIEW - CLIENT SOFTWARE - MAINT. PER TOUCH PANEL 4 $1,461.92 $130.11 $1,592.03
IR - Annual Payment 5 50043 AXON INTERVIEW - STREAMING SERVER MAINTENANCE - PER SERVER 2 $939.16 $83.59 $1,022.75
IR - Annual Payment 5 50045 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - INTERVIEW ROOM UNLIMITED 8 $12,729.60 $0.00 $12,729.60
IR - Annual Payment 5 50448 AXON INTERVIEW - EXT WARRANTY 4 $746.90 $66.47 $813.37
OSP - Annual Payment 5 101283 AXON RECORDS - DRAFT ONE - AI-ASSISTED REPORT WRITING 98 $87,789.01 $7,813.22 $95,602.23
OSP - Annual Payment 5 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 3 $90.15 $8.02 $98.17
OSP - Annual Payment 5 M00015 BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 98 $422,004.64 $32,036.31 $454,040.95
OSP - Annual Payment 5 ProLicense Pro License Bundle 20 $12,413.02 $1,104.76 $13,517.78
OSP - Annual Payment 5 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $2.91 $0.00 $2.91
Total $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2030
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Fleet - Annual Payment 6 Fleet3A10Yr Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 54 $120,101.94 $8,200.34 $128,302.28
Fleet - Annual Payment 6 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $8,603.38 $765.70 $9,369.08
IR - Annual Payment 6 50039 AXON INTERVIEW - CLIENT SOFTWARE - MAINT. PER TOUCH PANEL 4 $1,461.92 $130.11 $1,592.03
IR - Annual Payment 6 50043 AXON INTERVIEW - STREAMING SERVER MAINTENANCE - PER SERVER 2 $939.16 $83.59 $1,022.75
IR - Annual Payment 6 50045 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - INTERVIEW ROOM UNLIMITED 8 $12,729.60 $0.00 $12,729.60
IR - Annual Payment 6 50448 AXON INTERVIEW - EXT WARRANTY 4 $746.90 $66.47 $813.37
OSP - Annual Payment 6 101283 AXON RECORDS - DRAFT ONE - AI-ASSISTED REPORT WRITING 98 $87,789.01 $7,813.22 $95,602.23
OSP - Annual Payment 6 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 3 $90.15 $8.02 $98.17
OSP - Annual Payment 6 M00015 BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 98 $422,004.64 $32,036.31 $454,040.95
OSP - Annual Payment 6 ProLicense Pro License Bundle 20 $12,413.02 $1,104.76 $13,517.78
OSP - Annual Payment 6 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $2.91 $0.00 $2.91
Total $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2031
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Fleet - Annual Payment 7 Fleet3A10Yr Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 54 $120,101.94 $8,200.34 $128,302.28
Fleet - Annual Payment 7 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $8,603.38 $765.70 $9,369.08
IR - Annual Payment 7 50039 AXON INTERVIEW - CLIENT SOFTWARE - MAINT. PER TOUCH PANEL 4 $1,461.92 $130.11 $1,592.03
IR - Annual Payment 7 50043 AXON INTERVIEW - STREAMING SERVER MAINTENANCE - PER SERVER 2 $939.16 $83.59 $1,022.75
IR - Annual Payment 7 50045 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - INTERVIEW ROOM UNLIMITED 8 $12,729.60 $0.00 $12,729.60
IR - Annual Payment 7 50448 AXON INTERVIEW - EXT WARRANTY 4 $746.90 $66.47 $813.37
OSP - Annual Payment 7 101283 AXON RECORDS - DRAFT ONE - AI-ASSISTED REPORT WRITING 98 $87,789.01 $7,813.22 $95,602.23
OSP - Annual Payment 7 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 3 $90.15 $8.02 $98.17
OSP - Annual Payment 7 M00015 BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 98 $422,004.64 $32,036.31 $454,040.95
OSP - Annual Payment 7 ProLicense Pro License Bundle 20 $12,413.02 $1,104.76 $13,517.78
OSP - Annual Payment 7 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $2.91 $0.00 $2.91
Total $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2032
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Fleet - Annual Payment 8 Fleet3A10Yr Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 54 $120,101.94 $8,200.34 $128,302.28
Fleet - Annual Payment 8 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $8,603.38 $765.70 $9,369.08
IR - Annual Payment 8 50039 AXON INTERVIEW - CLIENT SOFTWARE - MAINT. PER TOUCH PANEL 4 $1,461.92 $130.11 $1,592.03
IR - Annual Payment 8 50043 AXON INTERVIEW - STREAMING SERVER MAINTENANCE - PER SERVER 2 $939.16 $83.59 $1,022.75
IR - Annual Payment 8 50045 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - INTERVIEW ROOM UNLIMITED 8 $12,729.60 $0.00 $12,729.60
Pa
g
e
3
0
0
o
f
3
0
6
Page 11 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Jan 2032
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
IR - Annual Payment 8 50448 AXON INTERVIEW - EXT WARRANTY 4 $746.90 $66.47 $813.37
OSP - Annual Payment 8 101283 AXON RECORDS - DRAFT ONE - AI-ASSISTED REPORT WRITING 98 $87,789.01 $7,813.22 $95,602.23
OSP - Annual Payment 8 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 3 $90.15 $8.02 $98.17
OSP - Annual Payment 8 M00015 BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 98 $422,004.64 $32,036.31 $454,040.95
OSP - Annual Payment 8 ProLicense Pro License Bundle 20 $12,413.02 $1,104.76 $13,517.78
OSP - Annual Payment 8 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $2.91 $0.00 $2.91
Total $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2033
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Fleet - Annual Payment 9 Fleet3A10Yr Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 54 $120,101.94 $8,200.34 $128,302.28
Fleet - Annual Payment 9 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $8,603.38 $765.70 $9,369.08
IR - Annual Payment 9 50039 AXON INTERVIEW - CLIENT SOFTWARE - MAINT. PER TOUCH PANEL 4 $1,461.92 $130.11 $1,592.03
IR - Annual Payment 9 50043 AXON INTERVIEW - STREAMING SERVER MAINTENANCE - PER SERVER 2 $939.16 $83.59 $1,022.75
IR - Annual Payment 9 50045 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - INTERVIEW ROOM UNLIMITED 8 $12,729.60 $0.00 $12,729.60
IR - Annual Payment 9 50448 AXON INTERVIEW - EXT WARRANTY 4 $746.90 $66.47 $813.37
OSP - Annual Payment 9 101283 AXON RECORDS - DRAFT ONE - AI-ASSISTED REPORT WRITING 98 $87,789.01 $7,813.22 $95,602.23
OSP - Annual Payment 9 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 3 $90.15 $8.02 $98.17
OSP - Annual Payment 9 M00015 BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 98 $422,004.64 $32,036.31 $454,040.95
OSP - Annual Payment 9 ProLicense Pro License Bundle 20 $12,413.02 $1,104.76 $13,517.78
OSP - Annual Payment 9 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $2.91 $0.00 $2.91
Total $666,882.63 $50,208.52 $717,091.15
Jan 2034
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Fleet - Annual Payment 10 Fleet3A10Yr Fleet 3 Advanced 10 Year 54 $120,101.94 $8,200.26 $128,302.20
Fleet - Annual Payment 10 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $8,603.38 $765.71 $9,369.09
IR - Annual Payment 10 50039 AXON INTERVIEW - CLIENT SOFTWARE - MAINT. PER TOUCH PANEL 4 $1,461.92 $130.12 $1,592.04
IR - Annual Payment 10 50043 AXON INTERVIEW - STREAMING SERVER MAINTENANCE - PER SERVER 2 $939.16 $83.56 $1,022.72
IR - Annual Payment 10 50045 AXON EVIDENCE - STORAGE - INTERVIEW ROOM UNLIMITED 8 $12,729.60 $0.00 $12,729.60
IR - Annual Payment 10 50448 AXON INTERVIEW - EXT WARRANTY 4 $746.90 $66.50 $813.40
OSP - Annual Payment 10 101283 AXON RECORDS - DRAFT ONE - AI-ASSISTED REPORT WRITING 98 $87,789.01 $7,813.21 $95,602.22
OSP - Annual Payment 10 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 3 $90.15 $8.06 $98.21
OSP - Annual Payment 10 M00015 BUNDLE - OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 10 PREMIUM 10YR 98 $422,004.64 $32,036.43 $454,041.07
OSP - Annual Payment 10 ProLicense Pro License Bundle 20 $12,413.02 $1,104.75 $13,517.77
OSP - Annual Payment 10 R1900Kit CRADLEPOINT R1900 SINGLE MODEM KIT 54 $2.91 $0.00 $2.91
Total $666,882.63 $50,208.60 $717,091.23
Pa
g
e
3
0
1
o
f
3
0
6
Page 12 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Tax is estimated based on rates applicable at date of quote and subject to change at time of invoicing. If a tax exemption certificate should be applied, please submit
prior to invoicing.
Standard Terms and Conditions
Axon Enterprise Inc. Sales Terms and Conditions
Axon Master Services and Purchasing Agreement:
This Quote is limited to and conditional upon your acceptance of the provisions set forth herein and Axon’s Master Services and Purchasing Agreement
(posted at https://www.axon.com/sales-terms-and-conditions), as well as the attached Statement of Work (SOW) for Axon Fleet and/or Axon Interview
Room purchase, if applicable. In the event you and Axon have entered into a prior agreement to govern all future purchases, that agreement shall govern to
the extent it includes the products and services being purchased and does not conflict with the Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program Appendix
as described below.
ACEIP:
The Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program Appendix, which includes the sharing of de-identified segments of Agency Content with Axon to
develop new products and improve your product experience (posted at www.axon.com/legal/sales-terms-and-conditions), is incorporated herein by
reference. By signing below, you agree to the terms of the Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program.
Acceptance of Terms:
Any purchase order issued in response to this Quote is subject solely to the above referenced terms and conditions. By signing below, you represent that you
are lawfully able to enter into contracts. If you are signing on behalf of an entity (including but not limited to the company, municipality, or government agency
for whom you work), you represent to Axon that you have legal authority to bind that entity. If you do not have this authority, please do not sign this Quote.
Pa
g
e
3
0
2
o
f
3
0
6
Page 13 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Exceptions to Standard Terms and Conditions
Agency has existing contract(s) originated via Quote(s):
Q-316163, Q-339622, Q-363861, Q-392391, Q-395673, Q-401400, Q-458554, Q-527253, Q-548482, Q-254526
Agency is terminating those contracts effective 2/1/2025 Any changes in this date will result in modification of the program value which may result in additional fees
or credits due to or from Axon.
The parties agree that Axon is applying a Net Transfer Debit of $36,117.77
100% discounted BWC Camera Hardware and Fleet Camera hardware contained in this quote reflects a TAP replacement for hardware purchased under existing
contract Q-254526, Q-316163, Q-339622, Q-363861, Q-392391, Q-395673, Q-401400, Q-458554. All Fleet and BWC TAP obligations from this contract will be
considered fulfilled upon execution of this quote.
Quotes Q-588250, Q-573765, Q-573791, Q-57380, and Q-573816 are contingent upon the execution of each other.
\s1\\d1\
Signature Date Signed
8/28/2024
Pa
g
e
3
0
3
o
f
3
0
6
Page 14 Q-588250-45532.693MD
Pa
g
e
3
0
4
o
f
3
0
6
Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and
appropriate investment and re- investment in community
infrastructure.
City Council Goals
QUALITY OF LIFE
2024-2025
Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services
and programs.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system.
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Implement targeted strategies to reduce crime through strategic
investments in infrastructure, staffing, and equipment.
COMMUNITY SAFETY
Promote and encourage economic vitality.
ECONOMIC VITALITY
Identify opportunities to enhance City of Pasco identity, cohesion,
and image.
CITY IDENTITY
Page 305 of 306
METAS DEL CONCEJO MUNICIPAL
2024-2025
Promover una alta calidad de vida a través de programas, servicios
y inversion apropiada y reinversión en la comunidad infraestructura
comunitaria.
CALIDAD DE VIDA
Promover viabilidad financiera a largo plazo, valor, y niveles de
calidad de los servicios y programas.
SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA
Promover un sistema de transporte multimodal altamente funcional.
RED DE TRANSPORTE DE LA COMUNIDAD
Implementar estrategias específicas para reducir la delincuencia por
medios de inversiones estratégicas en infraestructura, personal y equipo.
SEGURIDAD DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD
Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica.
VITALIDAD ECONOMICA
Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la
cohesión, y la imagen.
IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA
Page 306 of 306