HomeMy WebLinkAbout4421 Resolution - Lewis St Overpass Change Orders 28-36Resolution – CO 28-36 for Lewis St Overpass - 1
RESOLUTION NO. 4421
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER
NOS. 28-36 TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH CASCADE
BRIDGE, LLC. FOR THE LEWIS STREET OVERPASS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington (City) and Cascade Bridge, LLC. entered into a
Construction contract on March 1, 2021, for construction of the Lewis Street Overpass Project;
and
WHEREAS, this project involves the construction of a new 562-foot, 4-span, pre-stressed
concrete overpass, over the BNSF Railway yard and a new 63-foot, voided slab, overpass over
First Avenue. Along with roadway improvements, backfilling, partial structure removal, retaining
wall construction, earthwork, paving with HMA, landscaping, storm drainage, illumination, water
mains, sanitary sewer, and other associated work; and
WHEREAS, the City and Cascade Bridge, LLC executed Change Orders Nos. 1 through
27 to provide for additional work not included in the original contract; and
WHEREAS, proposed Change Orders Nos. 28 through 36 involve additional work related
to: thickened edge treatment, Phase 1B traffic control, a revised joint utility trench, revisions to an
irrigation trench, revised Franklin Public Utility District (FPUD) trench, additional survey costs,
added paper joints, and additional sealant for a total of $74,934.92; and
WHEREAS, the $74,934.92 amount of Change Order No. 28-36, added to the cumulative
sum previously approved change orders, exceeds the City Manager’s authority, and thus requires
Council approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into Change
Order Nos. 28-36 with Cascade Bridge, LLC.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the Change
Order Nos. 28-36 between the City of Pasco and Cascade Bridge, LLC. as attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Be it Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Change Order Nos. 28-36 on behalf of the
City of Pasco.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution will take effect immediately.
Resolution – CO 28-36 for Lewis St Overpass - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this 20th day of
February, 2024.
_____________________________
Pete Serrano
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Change Order Nos. 28 – 36 Summary
•Change Order 028 – Thickened Edge Treatment ($19,792.64): This change order compensates
the contractor to fabricate and install an additional pedestrian guardrail and construct a sidewalk
with a thickened edge. Project plans originally identified a portion of the pedestrian guardrail as
chain link fencing; however, this segment needs to be a pedestrian guardrail. In order to have
the necessary structural foundation for the handrail, a thickened edge is required on the back
edge of the sidewalk.
•Change Order 029 – Revised Joint Utility Trench ($6,895.00): The costs included in CO 029 are to
relocate several utility vaults and revise the utility trench to accommodate new conduits for
Lumen, Charter, and FPUD required to connect to their existing system. Conduits and electrical
vault materials were provided by the utilities. This also includes transportation costs for the
contractor to pick up the electrical vaults which are being supplied by FPUD and deliver them to
the site.
•Change Order 030 – Infiltration Trench ($3,117.81): The costs included in CO 030 are to relocate
storm drainage facilities. In 2022, the project team discovered there had been basements
constructed below the sidewalk at the intersection of 2nd Ave and Lewis Street. Because of this
issue, portions of the storm drainage facilities have been revised and relocated to avoid excavation
immediately adjacent to the building's basement walls.
•Change Order 031 – Revised Irrigation Plan ($4,717.35): The costs included in CO 031 are to revise
the irrigation plan to reroute and upsize service to the landscaping between the bridges.
•Change Order 032 – Revised FPUD Trench ($10,487.14): During construction, it was determined
the existing FPUD trench would need to be extended to connect to FPUD’s system at a different
location than originally planned. FPUD provided materials related to this change order which were
installed by the project contractor.
•Change Order 033 – Extra Survey Cost ($1,587.00): This change order compensates the
contractor to bring a licensed surveyor back to the project site to re-survey several project features
that were incorrectly identified on the plans.
•Change Order 034 – Paper Joints (West) ($3,680.00): The costs included in CO 034 compensate
the contractor to construct paper (temporary) joints on the west side of the project. These joints
were added to allow the contractor to place a final top lift near the end of construction and avoid
nearly one year of construction traffic.
•Change Order 035 – Additional Selant ($14,657.98): The costs included in CO 035 compensate
the contractor for adding additional sealant to the railroad screening. At locations of stitch welds,
the fabricator notified the City that an additional coating was needed to ensure no long-term
corrosion of the railroad screening at these weld locations. This clear coating was applied to the
weld areas of 48 panels of railroad screening and is compatible with the remainder of the coating
system.
•Change Order 036 – Phase 1B ($27,133.28): The costs included in the CO 036 compensate the
contractor for additional costs associated with the closure of Lewis Street while moving traffic
from the existing underpass to the overpass. These costs supplement Change Order 027, which
provided additional traffic control costs for phase 1A.
EXHIBIT A