HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023.11.20 Council Meeting PacketAGENDA
City Council Regular Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, November 20, 2023
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & GoToWebinar
Page
1.MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would
like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out
the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment)
to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings
must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this meeting.
To listen to the meeting via phone, call (415) 655-0060 and use access code
307-404-066.
City Council meetings are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at
www.facebook.com/cityofPasco.
2.CALL TO ORDER
3.ROLL CALL
(a)Pledge of Allegiance
4.CONSENT AGENDA - All items listed under the Consent Agenda are
considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call
vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate
discussion by is discussion desired If items. these further of
Councilmembers, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the
Regular Agenda and considered separately.
6 - 19 (a)Approval of Meeting Minutes for November 6th and November
13th
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting
and Regular Workshop held on November 6, 2023 and November 13,
2023 respectively.
20 - 22 (b)Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total
Page 1 of 226
Amount of $6,431,100.71 and Bad Debt Write-off Totaling
$268,603.29
To approve claims in the total amount of $6,431,100.71 in Check
Nos. 259674 - 260074.
To approve bad debt write-off for accounts receivable including
Ambulance, in the total amount of $268,603.29 and, of that amount,
authorize $48,318.38 to be turned over for collection.
23 - 33 (c)Resolution No. 4360 - Project Acceptance for Argent Road
Improvements, Phase 2 Project
To approve Resolution No. 4360, accepting work performed by
Ellison Earthworks, LLC under contract for the Argent Road
Improvements, Phase 2 Project.
34 - 39 (d)Resolution No. 4394 - Declaring the City of Pasco 2024
Legislative Priorities
To approve Resolution No. 4394, declaring the City's Legislative
Priorities for the 2024 Session of the Washington State Legislature.
40 - 57 (e)Resolution No. 4395 - 2024 Community Development Block
Grant Work Plan and Allocations
To approve Resolution No. 4395, approving the program years 2024
Community Plan Work Annual and Block Development Grant
Allocations.
58 - 68 (f)Resolution No. 4396 - 2024 HOME Annual Work Plan and
Allocation
To approve Resolution No. 4396, approving the Federal 2024 HOME
Annual Work Plan and Allocation.
69 - 72 (g)Health of Department Approval - of No. *Resolution 4397
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Construction
Funding Application for West Pasco WTP Improvements Project
To approve Resolution No. 4397, authorizing the submittal of the
Department of Health Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF)
Loan Application for the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant, Phase 3
& 4 project for an amount of up to $12,000,000.00.
73 - 76 (h)*Resolution No. 4398 - Approval of the Washington State Public
Works Board Pre-Construction Loan Application for Butterfield
WTP Improvements Project
To approve Resolution No. 4398, authorizing the submittal of the
Public for Works Board Pre-Construction Loan application the
Page 2 of 226
Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Improvements project.
77 - 80 (i)*Resolution No. 4399 - Bid Award for Oregon Avenue Overlay
(SR397) Project
To approve Resolution No. 4399, awarding the construction contract
for Bid No. 21305 - Oregon Avenue Overlay (SR397) Project to
Central Washington Asphalt, Inc. of Moses Lake, Washington in the
amount of $2,520,000, and further, authorize the City Manager to
execute the contract documents.
81 - 91 (j)*Resolution No. 4400 - Acceptance of Work for Schlagel Park -
Parking Lot and Boat Ramp Improvements
To approve Resolution No. 4400, accepting work performed by
Goodman and Mehlenbacher Enterprises Inc. of Kennewick,
Washington, under contract for Schlagel Park- Parking Lot and Boat
Ramp Improvements Project No. 16999.
(RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
5.PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
6.PUBLIC COMMENTS - The public may address Council on any items
unless it relates to a scheduled Public Hearing. This item is provided to
allow the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to
express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for
debate or for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate
response. Some questions require consideration by Council over time and
after a deliberative process with input from a number of different sources;
some questions are best directed to staff members who have access to
specific information. Citizen comments will normally be limited to three
minutes each by the Mayor. Those with lengthy messages are invited to
summarize their comments and/or submit written information for
consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings.
7.REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS
(a)Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
92 - 134 (b)Ad Valorem Tax (Property Tax) and General Fund Revenue
Presentation
Presentation of Ad Valorem (Property Tax) Process by Franklin
County Assessor John A. Rosenau
Presentation of City of Pasco General Fund Revenue by Finance
Director Darcy Buckley
8.HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO
Page 3 of 226
9.ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS
135 - 182 (a)Resolution Nos. 4401, 4402, and 4403 - Change Orders Nos. 22-
27 for the Lewis Street Overpass and PSA Amendments with J-
U-B Engineers, Inc. and WSP USA, Inc. respectively for
Construction Support and Construction Management
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4401, authorizing the
City Manager to execute Change Order No. 22-27 to the Construction
Contract with Cascade Bridge, LLC for the Lewis Street Overpass
Project.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4402, authorizing the the
City Manager to execute Supplement No. 5 to the Professional
Services Agreement with J-U-B Engineers, Inc. for the Lewis Street
Overpass Project.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4403, authorizing the
City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 for the Professional
Services Agreement with WSP USA, Inc. for the Lewis Street
Overpass project.
183 - 224 (b)Ordinance No. 4694 - Amending PMC Title 21 Related to Street
Connectivity
MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance No. 4694, amending
Sections 21.05.020 “Purpose;” 21.05.030 “Application of this Title;”
21.05.040 “Exceptions;” 21.05.060 “Approval Required;” 21.10.020
“Terms Defined;” Chapter 21.15 “Streets;” and Section 21.20.010
“Block Length” and within Title 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision
Regulations” of the Pasco Municipal Code and, further, authorize
publication by title only.
10.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
11.NEW BUSINESS
12.MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION
13.EXECUTIVE SESSION
14.ADJOURNMENT
15.ADDITIONAL NOTES
(a)(RC) Roll Call Vote Required
* Item not previously discussed
Page 4 of 226
Q Quasi-Judicial Matter
MF# “Master File #....”
225 - 226 (b)Adopted 2020-2021 Council Goals (Reference Only)
(c)REMINDERS
Monday, November 20, 6:00 PM: LEOFF Disability Board –
City Hall Conference Room 1, Pasco City Hall (MAYOR
BLANCHE TEM PRO IRVING Rep.; BARAJAS, MAYOR
BROWN, Alt.)
Tuesday, November 21, 4:00 PM: Pasco Public Facilities
District Board Meeting – Council Chambers, Pasco City
Hall (COUNCILMEMBER MELISSA BLASDEL Rep.;
COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE, Alt.)
Monday, November 27, 4:00 PM: Hanford Area Economic
Investment – Meeting Ben Advisory Fund Committee
Franklin Transit Main Conference Room
(COUNCILMEMBER PETE SERRANO, Rep.)
This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the
Clerk for assistance.
Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por
favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para
garantizar la disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter
service may be provided upon request. Please provide two
business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.)
Page 5 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council November 15, 2023
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Debra Barham, City Clerk
City Manager
SUBJECT:Approval of Meeting Minutes for November 6th and November 13th
I.REFERENCE(S):
11.06.2023 & 11.13.2023 Draft Council Minutes
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting and
Regular Workshop held on November 6, 2023 and November 13, 2023
respectively.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V.DISCUSSION:
Page 6 of 226
MINUTES
City Council Regular Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, November 6, 2023
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & GoToWebinar
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Blanche Barajas, Mayor.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Blanche Barajas, Irving Brown, Joseph Campos, Pete
Serrano, David Milne, Melissa Blasdel, and Zahra Roach
Councilmembers absent: None
Staff present: Adam Lincoln, City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager;
Angela Pashon, Assistant City Manager; Darcy Buckley, Finance Director; Kevin
Crowley, Fire Chief; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; Jacob Gonzalez, Community &
Economic Development Director; Jesse Rice, Information Technology Director &
Interim Administrative & Community Services Director; Ken Roske, Police Chief;
Steve Worley, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Meeting Minutes for October 16th and October 23rd
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting and Regular
Workshop held on October 16, 2023 and October 23, 2023 respectively.
Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of
$6,137,676.08 and Bad Debt Write-off Totaling $49,745.98
To approve claims in the total amount of $6,137,676.08 ($21,328.15 in Check
Nos. 54591 - 54606; $2,296,244.21 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30198097 -
30199423; $3,736,158.51 in Check Nos. 259385 - 259673; $83,945.21 in
Electronic Transfer Nos. 843063 - 843064; 843081 - 843095; 843109 - 843136;
843219; 843225 - 843226; 843271 - 843425).
Page 1 of 10Page 7 of 226
To approve bad debt write-off for accounts receivable including Ambulance
Accounts in the total amount of $49,745.98 and, of that amount, authorize
$49,745.98 to be turned over for collection.
Approve Visit Tri-Cities 2023 Reserves Funding Request & Tri-City Regional
Hotel/Motel Commission 2024 Marketing Plan & Budget
To approve the 2023 TPA Reserve Investments transfer totaling $225,00.00 for
restructure of Digital Marketing Programs and support for Signature Sports
events.
To approve the Tri-City Regional Hotel/Motel Commission 2024 Marketing Plan
and Operating Budget for the Tourism Promotion Area in the total amount of
$$2,200,000.00, with the City of Pasco's share of $572,000.00.
Resolution No. 4386 - Housing Action and Implementation Plan; Ordinance
No. 4688, Amending PMC Chapter 3.40; & Resolution No. 4387, Terminating
Interlocal Agreement Related to PILOT Fee in Lieu of Tax
To approve Resolution No. 4386, adopting the Pasco Housing Action and
Implementation Plan in accordance with RCW 36.70.A.600
To approve Ordinance No. 4688, amending the Pasco Municipal Code Chapter
3.40 "Impact Fees" related to Impact Fee Deferral Program and, further, authorize
publication by summary only.
To approve Resolution No. 4387, authorizing the City Manager to sign and
execute an agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Pasco and
Franklin County terminating the Interlocal Agreement related to PILOT Fee In Lieu
of Tax.
Arts & Culture Commission Appointment of Patrick Fleming
To confirm Mayor Barajas's appointment of Patrick Fleming to the Arts & Culture
Commission to Position No. 3, Art Professional, with a term from November 6,
2023 to January 1, 2026.
Resolution No. 4388 - 2023-2024 Pasco Police Commanding Officers
Association - Collective Bargaining Agreement
To approve Resolution No. 4388, authorizing the City Manager to sign and
execute the 2023-2024 Collective Bargaining Agreement between the City of
Pasco and the Pasco Police Commanding Officers Association Bargaining Unit.
To approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Pasco and
the Pasco Police Commanding Officers Association related to a ratification bonus
to the 2023-2024 Collective Bargaining Agreement.
Page 2 of 10Page 8 of 226
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember
Serrano to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
RESULT:Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES:Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Brown, Councilmember
Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember
Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, and Councilmember
Roach
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Joe Cline, Pasco resident, expressed opposition on the item located in pending 2023
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket.
Steven Schlagel, Pasco resident, expressed opposition on the item located in pending
2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket.
Teresa Kruschke, Pasco resident, expressed opposition on the item located in
pending 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket.
Peter Harpster, Pasco resident, commented on the water rights issue and expressed
support for the amendments to the water rights fees. He expressed appreciation for
the Spooky Hall event held on October 31st. He also encouraged everyone to vote by
Tuesday, November 7th.
Duncan Campbell, Pasco resident, expressed opposition on the item located in
pending 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket.
Jeff Smith, Pasco resident, expressed opposition on the item located in pending 2023
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket.
Marla Marvin, Pasco resident, expressed opposition on the item located in pending
2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket.
REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS
Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
Mr. Serrano thanked staff and the local businesses for preparing and supporting
the Spooky Hall event.
Ms. Roach reported on Visit Tri-Cities Board meeting she recently attended.
Mayor Pro Tem Brown commented briefly on the recent trip to the State of
Colima, Mexico for the Colima and Pasco Friendship Agreement (COPA) effort.
Mr. Milne also commented briefly on the recent trip to the State of Colima,
Page 3 of 10Page 9 of 226
Mexico.
Mayor Barajas expressed thanks to staff related to the last Farmers Market that
included a Fun Run. She also reported briefly on the recent trip to the State of
Colima, Mexico.
Pasco Public Facilities District Board Report
Mr. Rice provided a brief history of the Pasco Public Facilities District (PPFD).
Then he introduced Matt Watkins, PPFD Executive Director with the PPFD.
Mr. Watkins first introduced Mark Morrissette, PPFD Board President and then
reported on the PPFD Board's activities in 2023 and plans for 2024-2025 related
to design and build of an Aquatics Facility within Pasco.
Council and Mr. Watkins briefly discussed the proposed 2024 PPFD Budget, as
well community other with a on campus location proposed its as situated
amenities.
HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
RELATING THERETO
Public Hearing & Ordinance No. 4689 - Right-of-Way Vacation at Road 76 &
Chapel Hill Boulevard (VAC 2023-002)
Mr. Gonzalez introduced City Engineer Padvorac who provided a brief report on
the proposed right-of-way vacation and dedication at Road 76 and Chapel Hill
Boulevard.
Ms. Roach asked if this will also include a pedestrian walkway.
Mr. Padvorac confirmed that, while this is still in design phase, that there will be a
separated multi-modal pathway on the same structure.
Mayor Barajas declared the Public Hearing open to consider the proposed right-
of-way vacation.
Charles Grimm, Pasco resident, expressed support for this project.
Kim Lehrman, Pasco resident, expressed support for this project.
Following being Barajas Mayor none, there calls comments, for three and
declared the Public Hearing closed.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Roach
to adopt Ordinance No. 4689, vacating right-of-way at Road 76 and Chapel Hill
Boulevard, by in Pasco, Washington; and further, authorize publication
summary only.
Page 4 of 10Page 10 of 226
RESULT:Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES:Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Brown, Councilmember
Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember
Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, and Councilmember
Roach
RECESS
Mayor Barajas called a five-minute recess at 8:02 PM.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Council adjourned into Executive Session at 8:07 PM for ten (10) minutes to
discuss with legal counsel about legal risks of current or proposed action per
RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) with the City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Community &
Economic Development Director, and City Attorney.
At 8:17 PM Mayor Barajas announced that the Executive Session would continue
for another five (5) minutes.
Mayor Barajas called the meeting back to order at 8:23 PM.
MOTION: Councilmember Campos moved, seconded by Councilmember
Blasdel to amend the agenda and move item 10(e) Resolution No. 4385 - 2023
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket before item 10(a) *Q Ordinance No.
4690 - Barker Ranch 1st Addn Rezone from R-S-1 to R-1 (Z 2021-002).
RESULT:Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES:Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Brown, Councilmember
Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember
Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, and Councilmember
Roach
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS
Resolution No. 4385 4393 - 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket
Mr. Gonzalez provided a brief report on the process for developing the 2023
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. He provided an overview the
application in the proposed Docket and the criteria for the land use proposal.
Pete and Irving asked for clarification on this action item in which Mr. Gonzalez
answered.
POST MEETING NOTE:Resolution No. 4385 was changed to Resolution No.
Page 5 of 10Page 11 of 226
4393 due to a Scrivener's error. Resolution No. 4385 had been assigned by a
resolution that was approved by Council at their October 16, 2023 meeting.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember
Campos to approve Resolution No. 4385 4393, establishing the 2023
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket list of item for further evaluation.
RESULT:Motion carried 5-2
AYES:Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Brown, Councilmember
Campos, Councilmember Blasdel, and Councilmember
Roach
NAYS:Councilmember Serrano and Councilmember Milne
Ordinance No. 4690 - Barker Ranch 1st Addn Rezone from R-S-1 to R-1 (Z
2021-002)
Mayor Barajas announced that the proposed rezone, Barker Ranch 1st Addition
was a quasi-judicial action and asked Mr. Ferguson to explain the procedure for
quasi-judicial items.
Mr. Ferguson read the quasi-judicial procedure including how the Appearance of
Fairness Doctrine applies to it. Next, he asked all Councilmembers a series of
questions associated with potential conflicts of interest to disclose such potential
conflicts or appearance of conflicts. With no response from the Councilmembers,
he asked if any members of the public were seeking to disqualify a member of
Council from participating in the proceedings. No one came forward.
Mr. Gonzalez provided a brief report on the proposed rezone.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Roach
to adopt Ordinance No. 4390, amending the zoning classification of certain real
property located near the northwest corner of Burns Road and Broadmoor
Boulevard, Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, from from R-S-1 to R-1, and
further, authorize publication by summary only.
RESULT:Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES:Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Brown, Councilmember
Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember
Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, and Councilmember
Roach
Ordinance No. 4691 - Glacier Park Rezone from C-1 to R-3 (Z 2023-005)
Mayor Barajas announced that the proposed rezone of Glacier Park was a quasi-
judicial action and asked Mr. Ferguson to explain the procedure for quasi-judicial
items.
Mr. Ferguson read the quasi-judicial procedure including how the Appearance of
Page 6 of 10Page 12 of 226
Fairness Doctrine applies to it. Next, he asked all Councilmembers a series of
questions associated with potential conflicts of interest to disclose such potential
conflicts or appearance of conflicts. With no response from the Councilmembers,
he asked if any members of the public were seeking to disqualify a member of
Council from participating in the proceedings. No one came forward.
Mr. Gonzalez provided a brief report on the proposed rezone.
MOTION: Councilmember seconded moved, Brown by Pro Mayor Tem
Serrano to adopt Ordinance No. 4691, amending the zoning classification of
certain real property located in the north 467.08 feet in the south 471.08 feet of
the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter Section 3, Township 9 North,
Range 29 East, W.M.; Franklin County, Washington, From C-1 To R-3 and
further, authorize publication by summary only.
RESULT:Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES:Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Brown, Councilmember
Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember
Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, and Councilmember
Roach
Ordinance No. 4692 - Helena Addition #2 Rezone from C-3 to R-1 (Z 2023-
006)
Mayor Barajas announced that the proposed rezone for Helena Addition No. 2
was a quasi-judicial action and asked Mr. Ferguson to explain the procedure for
quasi-judicial items.
Mr. Ferguson read the quasi-judicial procedure including how the Appearance of
Fairness Doctrine applies to it. Next, he asked all Councilmembers a series of
questions associated with potential conflicts of interest to disclose such potential
conflicts or appearance of conflicts. With no response from the Councilmembers,
he asked if any members of the public were seeking to disqualify a member of
Council from participating in the proceedings. No one came forward.
Mr. Gonzalez provided a brief report on the proposed rezone.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel
to adopt Ordinance No. 4692, amending the zoning classification of certain real
property located along the south side of East Helena Street and approximately
one block east of Heritage Boulevard, Pasco, Franklin County, Washington,
from C-3 to R-1, and further, authorize publication by summary only.
RESULT:Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES:Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Brown, Councilmember
Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember
Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, and Councilmember
Roach
Page 7 of 10Page 13 of 226
Ordinance No. 4693 - Franklin County Irrigation District Franchise
Agreement
Mr. Worley provided a brief report on the proposed franchise agreement with
Franklin County Irrigation District.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Roach
to adopt Ordinance No. 4693, granting to and receiving from the Franklin
County Irrigation District No. 1 Mutual, Reciprocal Franchises for easement
and right-of-way use and further, authorize publication by summary only.
RESULT:Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES:Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Brown, Councilmember
Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember
Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, and Councilmember
Roach
Resolution No. 4389 - Setting a Public Hearing Date to consider a Right-of-
Way Vacation at Wyoming Avenue (VAC 2023-001)
Mr. Gonzalez provided a brief report for the proposed resolution to set a public
hearing for consideration of a right-of-way vacation.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel
to approve Resolution No. 4389, setting 7:00 p.m., Monday, December 4,
2023, as the time and date for a public hearing to consider the vacation of a
portion of North Wyoming Avenue right-of-way in Frey's Addition to Pasco,
Washington.
RESULT:Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES:Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Brown, Councilmember
Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember
Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, and Councilmember
Roach
Resolution No. 4390 - Supplement No. 1 to HLA Engineering and Land
Surveying, Inc. Professional Services Agreement for the Oregon Avenue
Overlay (SR397) Project
Deputy Public Works Director Serra provided a brief report on the proposed
supplement for the Oregon Avenue Overlay project.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel
to approve Resolution No. 4390, authorizing the City Manager to sign and
execute Supplement No. 1 for the Professional Services Agreement with HLA
Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc. for the Oregon Avenue Overlay (SR397)
Project.
RESULT:Motion carried unanimously 7-0
Page 8 of 10Page 14 of 226
AYES:Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Brown, Councilmember
Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember
Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, and Councilmember
Roach
Resolution No. 4391 - Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to HDR Engineering,
Inc. Professional Services Agreement for the Argent Road Widening Phase
3 Project
Deputy Public Works Director Serra provided a brief report on the proposed
supplement for the Argent Road Widening Phase 3 project.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Blasdel
to approve Resolution No. 4391, authorizing the City Manager to execute
Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement #21-036
with HDR Engineering, Inc., for engineering construction support services on
the Argent Road Widening Phase 3 Project.
RESULT:Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES:Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Brown, Councilmember
Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember
Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, and Councilmember
Roach
Resolution No. 4392 - Interagency Agreement with the Washington Traffic
Safety Commission for Traffic Safety Emphasis Patrols
Police Chief Roske provided a brief report on the proposed approval of an
interagency agreement with the Washington Traffic Safety Commission.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Brown moved, seconded by Councilmember Roach
to approve Resolution No. 4392, authorizing the City Manager to execute the
interagency agreement between the Washington Traffic Safety Commission
and the City of Pasco for traffic safety emphasis patrols.
RESULT:Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES:Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Brown, Councilmember
Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember
Milne, Councilmember Blasdel, and Councilmember
Roach
MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION
Mr. Gonzalez reported the Washington State Department of Commerce visit to Pasco
on Friday, November 3rd to share the ongoing efforts to address the housing crisis.
He announced that the Tri-Cities HOME Consortium is accepting applications from
organizations of risk at individuals or address that agencies and families
homelessness. Lastly, he stated that staff recently met with the Home Builders
Association residential of Tri-Cities where they discussed updates on design
Page 9 of 10Page 15 of 226
standards and street connectivity efforts as well as sharing some recent updates on
our efforts to update and modernize our development review process.
Mr. Worley announced that the City will be hosting Washington State Transportation
Commission meetings scheduled on November 14th and 15th.
Mr. Lincoln announced that Mr. Rice accepted the position of the newly retitled Parks
and Recreation Director (formally known as Administration & Community Services
Director) for the City of Pasco.
Mr. Rice reported on the following:
the City's United Way fundraising efforts
the recent Spooky Hall event
the recent Washington State Cross-Country Track Meet
City Hall will be closed on Friday for Veterans Day
a Veterans Day event will be held at City View Cemetery
the Cemetery will participate in the "Wreaths Across America" scheduled for
December 16, 2023
final Farmers Market report
Winterfest event will be relocated to Peanuts Park
December 16th is the annual Lampson Cable Bridge Run
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:13 PM.
PASSED and APPROVED this ____ day of ________________, 20__.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Blanche Barajas, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 10 of 10Page 16 of 226
MINUTES
City Council Workshop Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, November 13, 2023
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & GoToWebinar
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Blanche Barajas, Mayor.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Blanche Barajas, Melissa Blasdel, Irving Brown,
Joseph Campos, David Milne, Zahra Roach, and Pete Serrano
Councilmembers absent: None
Staff present: Adam Lincoln, City Manager; Angela Pashon, Assistant City
Chief; Fire Crowley, Kevin Manager; Finance Buckley, Darcy Eric Director;
Ferguson, City Attorney; Jacob Gonzalez, Community & Economic Development
Director; Jesse Rice, Information Technology Director & Interim Administrative &
Community Services Director; Ken Roske, Police Chief; Steve Worley, Public
Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
Mr. Serrano reported on the Veterans Day event held at the City View Cemetery on
November 11, 2023.
Mr. Milne reported on the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board meeting that he
attended recently.
Mayor Barajas expressed appreciation to all veterans, as well as active military
members for their service to the country.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
Presentation of 2024 Legislative Priorities
Page 1 of 3Page 17 of 226
Mr. Lincoln introduced Briahna Murray, Vice President, Gordon Thomas
the on report brief a 2023 who Affairs Governmental Honeywell provided
legislative accomplishments and an overview of the proposed 2024 legislative
priorities.
Council, Ms. Murray, Mr. Lincoln, Police Chief Roske, Fire Chief Crowley, and Mr.
Worley discussed the proposed legislative priorities, which included:
Adding a bullet point in support of additional legislative work to the Blake
Fix in a future legislative session.
The placement (layout) of the proposed legislative priorities were strategic
as this document is a good communications tool when addressing the
legislators.
The support for carbon reduction and possible opportunities for grants.
Express opposition for the removal of the dams on the lower Snake River;
however then support for funding to help with repairs to those dams
located on the lower Snake River
recent funding requests for Transportation projects.
to are who Narcan individuals to related training Staff administering
experiencing drug overdoses and possible lawsuits. Both Police and Fire &
Emergency Services staff are trained in administering Narcan.
Resolutions - Change Orders Nos. 22-27 for the Lewis Street Overpass and
PSA Inc. WSP and Inc. USA, J-U-B with Amendments Engineers,
respectively for Construction Support and Construction Management
Mr. Worley introduced Michael Ulhman, PE, HLA Project Manager who reported
on Services Professional two the to orders and change the amendments
Agreements related to the Lewis Street Overpass project.
Council, Mr. Ulhman and Mr. Worley further discussed the reasons the proposed
change orders for with the Lewis Street Overpass project are needed. The
discussion also included the additional costs associated with the change orders,
possible funding opportunities and use of funding from other scheduled projects
to finish this project.
Mr. Worley noted that there are additional phases in this project and he described
the phases. He stated that Council will be notified when those phases begin.
Resolution - 2024 Community Development Block Grant Annual Work Plan
and Allocations
Mr. Gonzalez introduced Block Grant Coordinator Kristin Webb who provided a
brief report on the 2024 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program.
Resolution - 2024 HOME Annual Work Plan and Allocations
Ms. Webb provided a brief report on the 2024 HOME Consortium program.
Page 2 of 3Page 18 of 226
MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION
Mr. Lincoln announced that Council will have an opportunity to cancel one or more of
their regularly scheduled December meetings/workshops at their December 4th
meeting. He also announced that the national community survey is out circulating in
the community.
Mr. Rice reported on the Veterans Day 2023 event.
Mayor Barajas commented on the Pasco Chamber of Commerce's Turkey Give Away
event and that volunteers are needed to support this event. She announced the grand
opening of a Salvation Army facility scheduled for November 16th. Lastly, she
received a request that the City of Pasco hold a Veterans Day parade.
Mr. Campos asked if the "Yard of the Month" program was still active.
Mr. Rice confirmed that the program was placed on hold during the COVID-19
pandemic and he would look into resurrecting it again in 2024.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Barajas announced that the Executive Session scheduled on the agenda
was cancelled.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:22 PM.
PASSED and APPROVED this __ day of ________________, 20__.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Blanche Barajas, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 3 of 3Page 19 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council November 16, 2023
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Darcy Buckley, Finance Director
Finance
SUBJECT:Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of
$6,431,100.71 and Bad Debt Write-off Totaling $268,603.29
I.REFERENCE(S):
Accounts Payable 11.15.2023
Bad Debt Write-off/Collection for September 2023
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve claims in the total amount of $6,431,100.71 in Check Nos. 259674
- 260074.
To approve bad debt write-off for accounts receivable including Ambulance, in
the total amount of $268,603.29 and, of that amount, authorize $48,318.38 to
be turned over for collection.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V.DISCUSSION:
Page 20 of 226
REPORTING PERIOD:
November 20, 2023
Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'l Bank Electronic Bank Combined
Check Numbers 259674 - 260074 -
Total Check Amount $6,431,100.71 $0.00 Total Checks 6,431,100.71$
Electronic Transfer Numbers --
Total EFT Amount $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total EFTs 0.00$
Grand Total 6,431,100.71$
Councilmember
100 943,809.40
110 29,557.51
140 3,910.76
142 28,653.27
145 1,214.36
150 91,672.67
160 1,393.00
165 1,842.00
168 50,877.30
170 163.22
180 688.05
185 784.93
189 517.90
190 13,349.07
191 26,250.00
194 10,404.91
196 HOTEL/ MOTEL EXCISE TAX 27,858.45
367 1,442,215.47
410 3,422,084.85
510 158,171.59
511 12,809.51
515 46,458.60
516 99,123.14
690 17,290.75
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS:6,431,100.71$
November 6 to November 15, 2023C I T Y O F P A S C O
Council Meeting of:
Accounts Payable Approved
The City Council
City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington
We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor
performed as described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and
Adam Lincoln, City Manager Griselda Garcia, Finance Manager
We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this
20th day of November, 2023 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment:
C.D. BLOCK GRANT
HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT
MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER
AMBULANCE SERVICE
Councilmember
SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND:
GENERAL FUND
STREET
CEMETERY
ATHLETIC PROGRAMS
ANIMAL CONTROL
SENIOR CENTER OPERATING
MULTI-MODAL FACILITY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
UTILITY, WATER/ SEWER
RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN
LITTER ABATEMENT
REVOLVING ABATEMENT
TRAC DEVELOPMENT & OPERATING
PAYROLL CLEARING
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING BUSINESS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT BUSINESS
Page 21 of 226
BAD DEBT WRITE-OFF/COLLECTION
September 1 to September 30, 2023
1. UTILITY BILLING - These are all inactive accounts, 60 days or older. Direct write-offs
under $20 with no current forwarding address or are accounts in "occupant" status. Accounts
submitted for collection exceed $20.00.
2. AMBULANCE - These are all delinquent accounts over 90 days past due or statements are
returned with no forwarding address. Those submitted for collection exceed $10.00. Direct
write off including DSHS and Medicare customers; the law requires that the City accept
assignment in these cases.
3. CODE ENFORCEMENT – LIENS - These are Code Enforcement violation penalties which
are either un-collectable or have been assigned for collections because the property owner
has not complied or paid the fine. There are still liens in place on these amounts which will
continue to be in effect until the property is brought into compliance and the debt associated
with these liens are paid.
4. CEMETERY - These are delinquent accounts over 120 days past due or statements are
returned with no forwarding address. Those submitted for collection exceed $10.00.
5. GENERAL - These are delinquent accounts over 120 days past due or statements are
returned with no forwarding address. Those submitted for collection exceed $10.00.
6. MISCELLANEOUS - These are delinquent accounts over 120 days past due or statements
are returned with no forwarding address. Those submitted for collection exceed $10.00.
Direct Referred to Total
Write-off Collection Write-off
Utility Billing $ - - -
Ambulance $ 220,284.91 48,318.38 268,603.29
Code Enforcement $ - - -
Cemetery $ - - -
General $ - - -
Miscellaneous $ - - -
TOTAL:$ 220,284.91 48,318.38 268,603.29
Page 22 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council November 15, 2023
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT:Resolution No. 4360 - Project Acceptance for Argent Road
Improvements, Phase 2 Project
I.REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
PowerPoint Presentation
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4360, accepting work performed
by Ellison Earthworks, LLC under contract for the Argent Road Improvements,
Phase 2 Project.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
See below.
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Argent Road Improvements Phase 2 project bid was awarded by Council
action to Ellison Earthworks, LLC of Richland, WA on May 2, 2022, in the
amount of $864,306.61. The project is now complete and was constructed per
project specifications. Final construction costs were $886,808.20.
Change Orders for the project were issued to address a discovered abandoned
storm trench within the project limits, the replacement of a failing Water Vault
lid and replacement of a pedestrian pole.
An additional factor in the contract price increase were tax rate adjustments
during the project tenure, from 8.6% 8.7% and later to 8.9%.
A reconciliation change order was created to document the difference in
Estimated quantities versus actual quantities.
Page 23 of 226
Formal acceptance of public works projects is required by State law and start
the 45-day period within which an outside vendor, supplier or laborer would
have an opportunity to file a claim against this project pursuant to RCW
60.28.011 (2). Upon completion of the 45-day lien filing period, retainage being
held by the City may be released upon receipts of the following:
An affidavit of no liens
A release from the Department of Revenue that all taxes have been paid
A release from any claims from the Department of Labor and Industries,
pursuant to RCW 60.28.051
V.DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends City Council's acceptance of the project as constructed by
the above listed contractor.
Page 24 of 226
Resolution – Argent Road Improvements, Phase 2 Project Closeout - 1
RESOLUTION NO. 4360
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY ELLISON EARTHWORKS, LLC,
UNDER CONTRACT FOR THE ARGENT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE
2 PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the work performed by Ellison Earthworks, LLC, under contract for the
Argent Road Improvements, Phase 2 project, has been examined by City of Pasco staff and has
been found to be in apparent compliance with the applicable project specifications and drawings;
and
WHEREAS, it is the City Staff’s recommendation that the City of Pasco formally accepts
the contractor's work and the project as complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council concurs with the Staff’s recommendation and thereby accepts the
work performed by Ellison Earthworks, LLC, under contract for the Argent Road Improvements,
Phase 2 project, as being completed in apparent compliance with the project specifications and
drawings.
Be It Further Resolved that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington
State Department of Revenue of this acceptance.
Be It Further Resolved that the final payment of retainage being withheld pursuant to
applicable laws, regulations and administrative determination shall be released upon satisfaction
of same and verification thereof by the Public Works Director and Finance Director.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of
___________________, 2023.
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 25 of 226
Pasco City Council Regular Meeting November 20, 2023Page 26 of 226
Argent Rd Improvements, Phase 2Project #21-229
Contract Awarded on May 2, 2022, to
Ellison Earthworks, LLC for $864,306.61Page 27 of 226
Argent Rd Improvements, Phase 2Before
Page 28 of 226
Argent Rd Improvements, Phase 2In Progress
Page 29 of 226
Argent Rd Improvements, Phase 2In Progress
Page 30 of 226
Argent Rd Improvements, Phase 2After
Page 31 of 226
Argent Rd Improvements, Phase 2After
Final Construction Cost: $886,808.20
Bid award: $864,306.61
Change Orders:
#1 –Removal of an abandoned storm trench, $2,671.02
(“Minor Change” line item)
#2 –Replacement of water vault lid on Road 36, $23,832.20
#3 -Replace Pedestrian Pole –$6,066.95
#4 –Reconciliation of Quantities –($7,426.30)
Tax rate adjustment $28.72Page 32 of 226
Questions?Page 33 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council November 15, 2023
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Adam Lincoln, City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT:Resolution No. 4394 - Declaring the City of Pasco 2024 Legislative
Priorities
I.REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
2024 Legislative Priorities
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION:City's the declaring 4394, No. I approve to move Resolution
Legislative Priorities for the 2024 Session of the Washington State Legislature.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The 2024 Washington State Legislative session will convene on Monday,
January 8th. The 2024 session is the second year of the two-year legislative
biennium, commonly referred to as the "short" session, the even year session
is supplemental on session short focuses days. 60 for scheduled The
operating, capital, and transportation budgets.
Gordon been Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs (GTHGA) has
contracted to assist in promoting the Council's legislative priorities to the
legislature. In doing so GTHGA assists in the development a comprehensive
legislative agenda and in furthering that agenda in Olympia by providing on-
the-ground (or virtual) presence in Olympia during session, monitoring the
legislature throughout the year, and advancing the City's legislative agenda.
The City has benefited by maintaining a proactive posture with the legislature
regarding the interests of Pasco. One means by which Council has made its
Page 34 of 226
concerns and interests known to the legislature, and specifically its legislative
delegation, is through the adoption of its City Legislative Priorities Statement.
V.DISCUSSION:
Attached is the 2024 Legislative Priorities list, which reflects modifications to
the previous agenda as recommended by staff and the legislative consultant,
Briahna Murray, Vice President, GTHGA. The proposed amendments to the
legislative priorities considered changed circumstances over the past year;
additionally, the priorities reflect current circumstances, overall Council policy
direction and the likelihood of success.
At the November 13, 2023, Council Workshop, Briahna Murray, Vice President,
GTHGA presented an overview of the upcoming session and review the
priorities and strategies for advocacy.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution declaring the City's legislative
priorities for the 2024 Washington State Legislature Session.
Page 35 of 226
Resolution - 2024 Legislative Priorities - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
DECLARING THE CITY’S LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES FOR THE 2024
SESSION OF THE WASHINGTON STATE LEGISLATURE.
WHEREAS, the 2024 Legislative Session of the Washington State Legislature
commences on January 8, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City), as a municipal corporation and political subdivision
of the State of Washington can be substantially affected by the actions of the Washington State
Legislature; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has evaluated conditions impacting the City of Pasco and
opportunities to improve the services the City provides to its citizenry; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to identify the legislative priorities for the 2024
Legislative Session so they can be provided to state legislators prior to the commencement of the
next legislative session.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the legislative objectives stated herein constitute the priorities of the City of Pasco for
the 2024 Legislative Session.
• REGIONAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION: Pasco joins communities throughout the
Tri-City region to request $4 million in capital funding to replace the region’s aging fire and
emergency medical system (EMS) radio system that is on the brink of failure and is based on
antiquated technology.
• PUBLIC SAFETY & BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: Pasco is experiencing a rise in
criminal activity. Pasco is working hard to prevent and respond this crime, but asks for the
state’s partnership in the following:
o Recruit and retain law enforcement officers.
o Allow officers to engage in vehicular pursuits for auto theft and some property crimes.
o Address auto theft and property crime, including additional investment in auto-theft
prevention and enforcement programs and regional property crimes task forces and
prosecution.
o Fund and implement alternative response teams, treatment facilities, and social
workers, treatment providers, and system navigators to help direct people to treatment.
o Invest in the Three Rivers Behavioral Health Recovery Center, which will provide over
550,000 individuals access to a full continuum of behavioral health services.
o Prevent opioid overdoses by increasing access to opioid overdose reversal medications
such as Naloxone (Narcan) while also not increasing liability to the City.
o Address possession and use of controlled substance, including implementing technical
changes and increased funding for successful implementation of SB 5536 (2023).
Page 36 of 226
Resolution - 2024 Legislative Priorities - 2
• TRANSPORTATION: The city requests funding to preserve the local and state
transportation system to improve safety. Pasco requests:
o $3 million for the design and right-of-way acquisition of the Road 76 Overpass Project
o $8 million for the Broadmoor Blvd Bike/Ped Bridge over I-182
o $1.5 million for the study and design of State Route 12 Safety Improvements between
A Street and Sacajawea Park/Tank Farm Road.
o $2 million for a feasibility study to allow access to I-182 and Hwy 395 from Argent
Road
o Fully fund grant programs, such as the WSDOT Bike/Ped Program, that will allow the
City to receive grant funds for eligible projects such as the Broadmoor Blvd Bike/Ped
Bridge over I-182
• WATER RIGHTS: Pasco needs additional water rights to serve its growing population.
The City supports proposals to allow the city to secure municipal water rights, including
the purchase of certificated inchoate water rights from municipalities and special purpose
districts and the ability to include land application of industrial wastewater as a ‘municipal
use.’
• HOUSING: Pasco encourages funding to be allocated to house the State’s most vulnerable
populations. The City supports state policies and investments that incentivize both the
private and public sectors to increase housing supply. The City amended its zoning code to
allow middle housing types in 80% of the city, and now asks the state to remove other
barriers to the construction of housing, such as relaxing condominium liability regulations,
reducing construction costs, and providing tax incentives.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager is hereby directed to inform state legislators
and other appropriate parties of the City’s 2024 Legislative Priorities.
Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution will take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of
_______________, 202_.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 37 of 226
City of Pasco
2024 State Legislative Priorities
REGIONAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION: Pasco joins communities throughout the Tri-
City region to request $4 million in capital funding to replace the region’s aging fire and
emergency medical system (EMS) radio system that is on the brink of failure and is based on
antiquated technology.
PUBLIC SAFETY & BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: Pasco is experiencing a rise in criminal activity.
Pasco is working hard to prevent and respond this crime, but asks for the state’s partnership in
the following:
• Recruit and retain law enforcement officers.
• Allow officers to engage in vehicular pursuits for auto theft and some property crimes.
• Address auto theft and property crime, including additional investment in auto-theft
prevention and enforcement programs and regional property crimes task forces and
prosecution.
• Fund and implement alternative response teams, treatment facilities, and social workers,
treatment providers, and system navigators to help direct people to treatment.
• Invest in the Three Rivers Behavioral Health Recovery Center, which will provide over
550,000 individuals access to a full continuum of behavioral health services.
• Prevent opioid overdoses by increasing access to opioid overdose reversal medications
such as Naloxone (Narcan) while also not increasing liability to the City.
• Address possession and use of controlled substance, including implementing technical
changes and increased funding for successful implementation of SB 5536 (2023).
TRANSPORTATION: The city requests funding to preserve the local and state transportation
system to improve safety. Pasco requests:
• $3 million for the design and right-of-way acquisition of the Road 76 Overpass Project
• $8 million for the Broadmoor Blvd Bike/Ped Bridge over I-182
• $1.5 million for the study and design of State Route 12 Safety Improvements between A
Street and Sacajawea Park/Tank Farm Road.
• $2 million for a feasibility study to allow access to I-182 and Hwy 395 from Argent Road
• Fully fund grant programs, such as the WSDOT Bike/Ped Program, that will allow the
City to receive grant funds for eligible projects such as the Broadmoor Blvd Bike/Ped
Bridge over I-182
WATER RIGHTS: Pasco needs additional water rights to serve its growing population. The City
supports proposals to allow the city to secure municipal water rights, including the purchase of
certificated inchoate water rights from municipalities and special purpose districts and the ability
to include land application of industrial wastewater as a ‘municipal use.’
HOUSING: Pasco encourages funding to be allocated to house the State’s most vulnerable
populations. The City supports state policies and investments that incentivize both the private
and public sectors to increase housing supply. The City amended its zoning code to allow
middle housing types in 80% of the city, and now asks the state to remove other barriers to the
construction of housing, such as relaxing condominium liability regulations, reducing
construction costs, and providing tax incentives.
Contact:
City Manager
(509) 544-3060
citymanager@
pasco-wa.gov
www.pasco-
wa.gov
Page 38 of 226
FINANCE/GENERAL GOVERNMENT
State-Shared Revenues Pasco supports preserving and enhancing state-shared revenue streams.
Local Control Pasco opposes any proposals that restrict, mandate, or otherwise interfere
with the city’s ability to make local decisions.
Public Records Act Pasco supports any proposals that reduce the impact of abusive public
records requests and litigation.
Election of Judges Pasco opposes legislation mandating that part-time municipal court judges
be elected rather than appointed.
Labor Reform Pasco opposes legislation that increases labor costs.
Insurance Costs
Recent legislation and subsequent court decisions have increased the legal
liability of public entities, resulting in higher rates for liability coverage. The
City’s liability rates increased by 27% from 2022 to 2023 and by another 17%
from 2023 to 2024. The City supports efforts to protect against liability
expansion and opposes new policies that would drive additional claims and
increase litigation costs.
Property Tax Cap Pasco supports adjustments to the property tax levy that will provide a more
sustainable funding source to match the growing needs of the community.
Extended Producer
Responsibility
Pasco supports producer responsibility for recycling paper and
packaging.
INFRASTRUCTURE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Complete Streets Pasco supports increased funding for the complete streets grant program.
Carbon Reduction
Pasco supports the distribution of Climate Commitment Act funding for city
priorities that aim to reduce carbon reduction and/or improve climate
resiliency.
Tri-Cities Mobility Pasco supports efforts to explore a third crossing over the Columbia River to
improve regional mobility throughout the Tri-Cities.
Lower Snake River Dams Pasco opposes the removal of dams along both the Columbia and Snake
Rivers.
Economic Development Tools
Pasco supports economic development tools to spur development
downtown and in key commercial corridors, including funding for an industrial
symbiosis project at the Port of Pasco.
Public Work Assistance Account Pasco supports increased funding to the Public Works Assistance Account
to fund basic infrastructure like drinking and wastewater.
LAND USE
Growth Management Act Paco opposes any proposals that create new planning obligations within the
Growth Management Act that are not coupled with adequate funding.
Pasco DNR Property
Pasco will continue working collaboratively with DNR to develop the
commercially-zoned properties west of Road 68. Pasco is opposed to DNR
buying land within the City’s UGA and asks that DNR divest itself of the
undeveloped agricultural land it currently owns within the UGA and keeping
the associated water rights with said land, not moving them outside city
limits.
Annexation
Pasco supports incentives that encourage annexation, including utilizing
utility extensions, and mechanisms that facilitate the annexation of
unincorporated islands.
The City of Pasco Supports/Opposes
Page 39 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Jacob Gonzalez, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT:Resolution No. 4395 - 2024 Community Development Block Grant Work
Plan and Allocations
I.REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Resolution
Planning Commission Minutes Dated 10/19/23
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4395, approving the program
years 2024 Community Development Block Grant Annual Work Plan and
Allocations.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
CDBG Entitlement for 2024 is estimated at $716,474 with prior year funds and
program income
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City of Pasco (City) receives an annual entitlement grant from the United
States the for (HUD) Development Urban and Housing of Department
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program authorized by Title 1 of
the Housing Community Redevelopment Act.
The City's grant allocation process is guided by Resolution No. 1969, which
designates the Planning Commission as the CDBG Block Grant advisory
committee and addresses several community needs for which the CDBG
program will provide funding. The resolution places priority on projects that
address community development needs in the areas of housing, parks,
community sponsored recreation, infrastructure, community facilities, economic
development, removal of substandard and hazardous conditions, planning, and
other activities that relate directly to improving the physical environment of the
Page 40 of 226
City.
The Planning Commission held public hearings at the August, 17, 2023,
September 21, 2023, and October 19, 2023, meetings. The public hearings
solicited public comment on any application for funding, or reallocation for the
City of Pasco 2024 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. At
the Planning Commission Meeting held on July 20, 2023, applicants presented
in regards to their proposed activities.
V.DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends approval of the 2024 Community Development Block Grant
Work Plan and Allocations as recommended by the Planning Commission.
This item was discussed at the November 13, 2023 Workshop and based on
that discussion staff will schedule a Council review of the program and
associated goals prior to the next funding cycle.
Page 41 of 226
Resolution – 2024 CDBG Program - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING THE PROGRAM YEAR 2024 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT ANNUAL WORK PLAN AND ALLOCATIONS
WHEREAS, staff has prepared the Program Year 2024 Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Annual Work Plan for activities totaling $716,474 from estimated entitlement,
program income and prior year reallocation funds.
WHEREAS, staff identified a criterion to align with City Council goals, the Tri-Cities
Consortium Consolidated Plan, funding for projects and whether the applicants’ activities meet the
intent of the CDBG/HUD mission. The applicants were given a score based on how many goals
their project met within the criteria.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the Pasco City Council hereby approves the Annual Work Plan as attached in Exhibit
A, and
Be It Further Resolved, that if entitlement funds are less than estimated, all projects will
be proportionately reduced with the exception of program administration and the debt repayment-
section 108 loan, and
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager, or authorized designee, is authorized to
execute all agreements in accordance with the Five-Year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action
Plan Supplements previously approved by Council.
Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution will take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2023.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 42 of 226
Resolution – 2024 CDBG Program - 2
EXHIBIT A
Activity Funding
CDBG Program Administration $133,000.00
Code Enforcement Officers- Rental Inspectors $112,000.00
Neighborhood Business District Improvements- 2nd to 5th Lewis St $50,000.00
Code & Community Program- Outreach/Clean up $10,000.00
Chip Minor Rehab Program- Rehabs $85,474.00
Pasco Specialty Kitchen- Equipment Replacement $25,000.00
Pasco Domestic Violence Outreach- 2 Employees $18,000.00
YMCA MLK Community Center Recreation Program- Employee $20,000.00
Improving Educational Equity in Benton/Franklin- Employee $10,000.00
Arc Therapeutic Recreation Scholarship Fund- Scholarship $3,000.00
DEBT REPAYMENT – SECTION 108 LOAN $250,000.00
TOTAL $716,474.00
Page 43 of 226
Pasco
PLANNINGCOMMISSIONMEETING MINUTES
City Hall-Council Chambers
525 North Third Avenue
Pasco,Washington
THURSDAY,SEPTEMBER 21,2023
6:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
City of Pasco Planning Commission meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m.,by Chair Jerry
Cochran.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chair Cochran led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present:Rosa Torres,Mitchell Mof?tt,Kim Lehrman,Rachel Teel,Paul Mendez,
Dana Crutch?eld,Jay Hendler and Jerry Cochran,a quorum was declared.
Commissioners Excused:Abel Campos
Staff Present:Community &Economic Development Director Jacob Gonzalez,Block Grant
Administrator Kristin Webb,and Administrative Assistant II Carmen Patrick.
WELCOME AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Chair Cochran explained the Planning Commission is an advisory board made up of volunteers
appointed by City Council.
He further explained the purpose of the Planning Commission was to provide recommendations to
City Council regarding changes to the City’s Comprehensive Plan,Land Use Updates,Block Grant
Allocations and Zoning Code.The Planning Commission is tasked with considering the long-term
growth and development of the community,the impact of land use decisions on community,
livability,economic opportunity,housing affordability,public services,and the environment.
Chair Cochran reminded the audience tonight’s proceedings were being broadcast live on City of
Pasc0’s Facebook page and on Charter Cable PSC Channel 191 and will be rebroadcast several times
during the next month.
He stated the meeting was also being recorded and could be watched on City of Pasco’s website,
which is Pasco-wa.gov.Click on the VIDEO ON DEMAND link and make your selection there.
Chair Cochran stated copies of the meeting agenda were available on the back table.He then asked
that everyone silence cell phones to prevent interruptions during the meeting.For those present this
evening,when you are given the opportunity to address the Commission,please come to the podium,
speak clearly into the microphone,and state your name and city of address for the record.
Chair Cochran reminded the audience and the Planning Commission that Washington State Law
requires public meetings like the one being held this evening not only be fair,but also appear to be
fair.In addition,Washington State Law prohibits Planning Commission members from participating
in discussions or decisions in which the member may have a direct interest or may be eitherbene?ted
or harmed by the Planning C0mmission’s decision.An objection to any Planning Commission
member hearing any matter on tonight’s agenda needs to be aired at this time or it will be waived.
Chair Cochran asked if there were any Planning Commission members who have a declaration at
this time regarding any of the items on the agenda.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 1of 14 September21,2023
Page 44 of 226
Section 105 Debt Service
714,479
ITEMS WERE COMBINED TOGETHER
'3'Chair Cochran recused himself due to being a board member of one of the applicants for the
2024 CDBG Fund Allocations.
Chair Cochran asked if anyone in the audience objected to any Planning Commission member
hearing any of the items on the agenda.
'3'None heard,record shows there were no declarations.
Chair Cochran stated the Planning Commission needed and Valued public input explaining it helped
the Commission understand the issues more clearly and allowed for better recommendations to City
Council.Furthermore,in many cases,this could be the only forum for the public to get facts and
opinions placed into the official record and City Council will use to make the Commission’s
decision.He encouraged those present to take ?lll advantage of this opportunity.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Lehrman moved to approve the Planning Commission meeting minutes of August 17,
2023,Commissioner Mof?tt seconded,and the motion carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A.2024 CDBG Allocations (MF:BGAP2023-003)
Kristin Webb spoke again on the background of the CDBG Program and went over the criteria
with the Commission.She rela ed the 2024 CDBG Staff Recommendations and is as follows:
1 ram 1 .'
Code Enforcement O?icers-Rental Inspectors 210.000 120.000
iNeiu|-uberhood Business District Improvemenb 2nd to 5th Lewis 82 10 352.000 50.000
Code 8-Community Progrem-Dutreechlcleen up days 9 10,000 10,000
§CHl-P Minor Rehab Prograrn-Rehab 8 125.000 75.000
8 75.000
8 100.000
7 200.000
gPasco Domestic Violence Outreach-2 Ernpolyees 3 70.000
lcivic Center Reeree?on Specielieb Employee 5 40.000
;MLK Community Center Recreation $peI:ielist-Ernpioyee 5 40.000
‘FirstAvenue Center Recreation Specialist-Kristin 5 30.000
:YMCA MLK Communi Center Recreation Program-Employee 5 50.000
‘improving Educelinnel Equity in BentonIFrenklin-Employee 5 30.000
‘Facade Improvement Program-Business lrnprvevemenl 5 25.000
5AStreet Field Lighb-Lights 5 200.000
:Kurtzm-en Perk Ejll?eld Selety Upgrede-Bleachers .equipment 5 35.000
'§Pesco Youth Recreation Scholarship-Scholarship 4 10.000
‘Mid-Columbia Meals on \Nheele-Meele 3 9.500
,-'ArvcTheraputie Recreation Scholarship Fund-Scholarship 2
250.000
uestions/Comments from Commissioners:
Commissioner Mendez asked are there any restrictions on how much we can allocate towards
program administration?Kristin Webb answered so with CDBG,you carmot allocate more than
20%towards program and admin.
Commissioner Lehrman asked looking at Code Enforcement Of?cers,if we didn't have CDBG
funds,would we still be able to take in from the general fund to be able to pay for them,how
many years has Code Enforcement Officers been paid for from CDBG ?mds and do other local
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 14 September 21,2023
;THESE
3 Staff RecommendationAPPLICANTS
Neighborhood Traffnc Management-A'l_'raf?c_|5
{lri‘l?ngg:ig:_>r‘_-PSK Equipmenb Replacement of Equipmoril
ADA Improvemenzs-Sid awalks 76.474
Page 45 of 226
cities do it the same way to fund their Code Enforcement Of?cers through their CDBG funds?
Jacob Gonzlez and Kristin Webb answered there would likely be a substantial decrease regarding
funding of that particular role for the City;They have been paid by CDBG funds going on six
years;If you're talking about the Tri-Cities,no,they don't.They fund them from their general
funds.But Code Enforcement is actually one of the biggest activities that other cities in the State
of Washington actually do because it does help with other aspects of the program.
Commissioner Torres I'm kind of concerned about the sustainability of going forward with keep
funding these inspectors out of these funds.I understand the criteria that was used to score these,
but I kind of feel like some of the other items in the list also would bene?t our community and
probably a more kind of greater good sense.
One of the things that is substantially different in this year's effort is that we aimed to achieve
alignment with adopted council goals and the other three criteria you see on the screen here.And
rental inspectors play a very important role in ensuring that our housing stock,in particular our
rental units.which is more than just your apartment buildings,but homes that are for rent,etc.,
remain in a good and safe,habitable manner.I can't speak to why it's been ?lnded primarily
through the CDB G,but I think one of the things that's becoming more evident,particularly as we
move forward with our housing efforts,is that quite frankly,the region has a shortage of
multifamily units,which requires rental inspectors.Those that have less violations are inspected
less,so,there is a method to it.
Commissioner Crutch?eld asked Mr.Gonzalez,as far as the Code Enforcement Of?cers,I
believe you said that we have three total and if this wasn't funded,we wouldn't be getting any
others from a different source or ?md in the City and how many does the City have currently?
Kristin Webb answered no,they were asking for three and we're trying to fund one and a half.If
we don't give them,then no,they will not be hiring any more people,and one.
Commissioner Mof?tt continued I understand,I do agree.We need the rental inspectors.We
don't want to be known as a City with shanty rentals once that hits the public,the papers and
stuff.If that were the case,we'd be in a world of hurt in so many ways.Our property values would
drastically reduce everywhere,even the private ownership,so I see the need.Maybe there is there
a possibility that we can get funding some other way?I just think that they need to look for
funding somewhere else and we need to put on as many as they need though.
Public Hearing:
James Larson 9817 W Star Lane:
Just one question,I guess I didn't catch it.How overloaded is the Code Enforcement person that
does the rental?Jacob Gonzalez answered extremely,and I would expect that case work,I guess
workload to dramatically increase with the current units being constructed today and those that
we will likely see over a very long period of time.James Larson continued I agree that that needs
to have another Code Enforcement.Thanks.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 14 September 21,2023
Page 46 of 226
Steve Howland with the YMCA:
YMCA is located in Richland,we've run the Martin Luther King Center for about 42 years now,
and obviously this is concerning.We were encouraged to increase our funding request this year.
But even at the continued ?lnding,the partnership originally started between the YMCA,the City
of Pasco,and United Way.When United Way stepped out,I approached the mayor at the time
and said,hey,we're going to have a tough time making up with this money with our current
fundraising efforts.So,the City came forward with CDBG money,and it's helped us keep this
going.
I got concerned when I look at this not only impact of the Y program,but the King Center as a
whole that would be losing ?lnding not only for the City staff,but for the Y.And so,I am
concerned with the neighborhood kids.It seems self-serving,but really what I'm looking at is for
the neighborhood kids in Kurtzman Park to make sure that the King Center remains an active,
viable place that addresses the low income nature of that community.We will continue to run the
King Center for as long as we can,but without some City funding in there or another source
coming at that level,I'm not sure if we can carry that on for more one or two years.So,I share
that as you consider this,just understand a lot of the nonpro?ts that are here are here for our
community kids and our families,and we appreciate the past support and ongoing any questions
I might be able to answer on behalf of the commissioner?
Commissioner Lehrman asked you said that you were encouraged to increase the funding,who?
Steve Howland continued we were.Outgoing leadership had said,hey,we think you need to
come back,increase your funding for this year.We said,great,we'll come back next year and
increase that.So,things change,and I understand that.It's just I look at a large increase going,
okay,we're not only get that,but we may not have anything.
Ron Anderson 2909 Road 100:
I'm looking at your chart there,and if I'm understanding it right,everything in the amount
requested is going to happen,or are you changing what's in the third column,and that's what's
going to happen?
Chair Cochran stated the third column is the staffs recommendations.We only have 714,000
available,and we have a mandatory $250,000 debt repayment.And so,what's remaining is,with
the ?.11’ldSleft,what can we do based on the criteria staff came up for scoring.So,it's those top
boxes up towards the top of the chart are the staffs recommendations that we're considering.So,
the things below that yellow line in the third column would not be funded based on staff
recommendations.
Chair Cochran closed the public hearing.
uestions/Comments from Commissioners:
Commissioner Crutch?eld stated I had a question on the ADA improvements for sidewalks and
that traf?c mitigation.I have been seeing a lot of work being done on tearing out the sidewalks
that don't comply with that.I think its state mandated or something.Like you have so much time
to complete that,perhaps.So,I'm wondering,is there any other vehicle by which that funds can
be obtained for that that would free up some of these block grant funds?Or is it the same?I don't
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 14 September 21,2023
Page 47 of 226
-1.
h
m
:1
know.
Jacob Gonzalez answered currently,right now,no.One of the challenges with those two in
particular is that these are improvements that would happen in areas that are already developed.
So,new development,you're building up to the ADA and today's standards,curb,gutter,
sidewalk,the full width,etc.,along with neighborhood traf?c calling measures and deadlines.
But we don't have a mechanism to identify which neighborhoods or what type of improvements
are necessary in existing neighborhoods that are dealing with problems today.So,staffs intent
with the combination of these two projects and line items is to develop a pilot program that
eventually we can identify other resources to fund those efforts.But until that's done,right now,
We're left with very limited resources,kind of in the same boat as everyone else here.
Commissioner Hendler said Mr.Gonzalez,if there's something identi?ed on an individual
property,it's not in a public right away,isn’t the owner noti?ed of a non-compliant ADA issue?
Isn't the owner required to do something about that?Jacob Gonzalez answered not if it was
installed dependingon when the development occurred.If it was built at the standards at the time
that met compliance.then that might be then it probably wouldn't be the case.
Commissioner Torres asked,this isn’t to actually ?x the sidewalks,this is just to design a plan
to ?x the sidewalks,correct?Jacob Gonzalez answered yes,I wouldn't expect this to be
something to an extent that would be on the CDBG funding list for several years in a row.
Commissioner Lehrman continued next,I have a comment and a question.So,I've heard from
multiple peoplethat the utility poles along Sylvester Street,along Edgar Brown Stadium is in the
way for those who would be in a wheelchair trying to get down the sidewalk between the fence,
the school district fence,and the utility pools.
Jacob Gonzalez answered yes,that's correct.In fact,unfortunately,that's the case that a lot of
older neighborhoods of the City.Can't explain why that is the case,but right across the street at
Volunteer Park,we have telephone poles and utility pools in the middle of the sidewalk.And if
you're in a wheelchair,a stroller,etc.,you're challenged on top of the circumstances given,that
being said,Sylvester Street is going through a fairly signi?cant public works project,which will
have new sidewalks,wider sidewalks,etc.So hopefully that is addressedwithin that project.
Commissioner Torres commentedI understand all of the projects and the recommendations,and
I just feel like it just doesn't sit well with me that all of these items that are being recommended.
I understand that there was a criteria,I understand we had a thing,but I almost feel like the
council goals have skewed these types of projects to be almost like augmenting the City budget.
Jacob Gonzalez said if I may add,so we do have a motion for the commission staff certainly
acknowledges and respects the discussion and from the public this evening.And We agree.It's
unfortunate.That being said,with a little bit more direction we can go back to the drawing table
and come back in October with the revised recommendation or alternatives for the commission
to take a look at.But I think staff would appreciate a little bit more direction in terms of what
elements you would speci?cally out of the goals.Unless you want to change those,see how the
scores are being achieved or if you would like to see certain projects moved up,what we can do
to document and justify that decision before it gets back for your review.
Planning CommissionMeeting Minutes Page 5 of 14 September 21,2023
Page 48 of 226
Commissioner Crutch?eld stated I feel like with the emphasis and that the City is placing upon
going ahead with a lot of multifamily dwellings and all the growth and so forth,that it just seems
like it should be part of that plan to be able to make sure that it's successful with Code
Enforcement.And so again,that would seem like it would just be part of that piece that would
be funded to do that and allocate these other funds elsewhere.
Commissioner Mof?tt moved to ask staff to go back to the table to come back in October with
three different plans that we can choose from or mix or look at.A being the one that we have in
front of us,which is supporting the City,I don't want to kick that out because we should consider
that.B being non-city and C being a hybrid mix.Motion was seconded by Commissioner
Lehrman and the motion passed unanimously.
B.2024 HOME Allocations &Work Plan
Kristin Webb reminded the Commission that Pasco entered into a Home Consortium Agreement
with Kennewick and Richland in 1996,making the cities eligible for federal home dollars.Each
member city is allocated an equal share of the entitlement,after 10%is set aside for lead agency
to administer the program,which is Richland,and 15%set aside for Community Housing
Development Organization which we call CHDO.Currently there is an RFP out to obtain a
CHDO until the end of December.And right now,we have been aware that there's two agencies
that are interested in applying for those funds.
The estimated entitlement funds for Pasco are $179,197.Estimated program income is $100,000.
These funds come from down payment assistance that have been paid off,and we're budgeting
$100,000 for owner occupied rehab.This is a new program that the consortium is trying to
allocate monies for.These dollars will help bring homes up to current code standards.So,with
only $100,000,we're anticipating probably only doing about two rehabs,and currently we're
working on one right now.Down payment assistance,we're only budgeting $10,000,anticipating
only doing one,as the purchase limit,which is set by HUD for Pasco,is $347,000,which means
that the purchase limit for a house cannot be more than that.
Tenant based rental assistance;we're budgeting 109,197.The consortium has a contract with
CAC Community Action Connection to administer the program for the three cities and then
program administration of $10,000 for staff to administer the program.
uestions/Comments from Commissioners:
None
Chair Cochran opened thepublic hearing.Hearing none afterthe third call,he closed thepublic
hearing.
uestions/Comments from Commissioners:
Commissioner Lehrman moved the planning Commission forward the recommendation as
presented to the City council workshop for consideration.Seconded by Commissioner Hendler,
and the motion passed unanimously.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 14 September 21,2023
Page 49 of 226
C.2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Jacob Gonzalez presented to the commission on establishing a docket for the 2023
Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle.He emphasizes that with any land use proposal,this
included,that there is no project permit building or action associated with it.It is simply a land
use matter.So,any further development of the site,whether approved or not,would require
potentially a rezone,which comes back to the hearing examiner and then the council and any
other project or building associated with the end.Land use and zoning classi?cation requires
evaluation by staff in accordance with the past municipal code,so it could still require more
decision maker actions.
0 The Comprehensive Plan should be considered a “living document”
0 To ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan,the GMA directs jurisdictions to create
a docket that clearly identi?es the amendment applications and proposals to be considered.
0 The application window was open for amendments from January through May 2023.
0 The City received one application (privately initiated)for the 2023 docket.
Criteria:
0 Is there suf?cient time for Council to make an informed decision?
0 Will the City be able to conduct suf?cient analysis to develop policy and related development
regulations?
0 Has the proposed amendment been previously rejected for consideration?
0 Will the amendment implement and comply with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and
Washington State Growth Management Act?
0 Is the proposed amendment better addressed through another planning process?
Description:
Applicant:Shane O'Neill,CloverPlanning&Zoning LLC
Description:FutureLandUseMap Amendment:Low Densit Residentialto
MixedResidentialand Commercial
Address/Parce|(s)118292036 &118292027
TotalArea (Acres)2.86
EnvironmentalDetermination »Determination of Non-Significance,issued 06/19/2023
uestions/Comments from Commissioners:
Commissioner Mof?tt commented I realize it's just a step forward,but you want to change it
from low density residential and mixed residential and commercial.Could you tell me what the
north of that plot?Chair Cochran said the church.Commissioner Mof?tt continued so what is
that zoned?Jacob Gonzalez answered we'll provide a zoning map next time this is in front of
you,but I believe the property to the north is likely a C-1 zone.So commercial in the general
vicinity with what you see here,it is surrounded by low density residential,which allows three
to six dwelling units per acre.Not too far to the north,you will have variations of medium density
residential,high density residential,commercial,mixed residential commercial,etc.,because
you'll get closer to the Chapel Hill and Road Interstate 182 interchange.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 14 September 21,2023
FileNumber:CPA2023-001
Page 50 of 226
Public Hearing:
Shane O’Neil1 Clover Plannin and Zonin Pasco
This is aerial footage of the vicinity.The vicinity subject site is right in front of you.It's looking
south.Okay,so,I'm here on behalf of the property owner.We amended our application to include
two parcels,like Jacob said,totaling about three acres.I'll say the last part ?rst,I just wanted to
reiterate that this stage in the process isn't really intended to analyze any site speci?c details or
even zoning speci?c considerations.
This is a land use map amendment,and there will be several other public hearings where
neighbors can come speak if they have concerns.I'll also offer my business card if those
residents would like to contact me for more information or to discuss this.So,I'd like to ?rst
encourage the Planning Commissioners to review my applicationmaterials.I've taken quite a
bit of time to put those together.They're strictly aligned with the criteria that Jacob mentioned,
together with the other criteria that come later on in the process for consideration.
I know this is always a tough subject for the immediately surrounding neighbors,but typically,
residents’resistance to change runs counter to the.Adopted goals and policies of Pasco's
comprehensive plan and the Washington State Growth Management Act.As con?rmed by
Jacob's staff report,our application clearly satis?es the ?ve code criteria to be placed on the
docket for further consideration at the next public hearing when discussion of site speci?c
impacts is admissible for the Planning Commission's review.Our goal here is to do a
redevelopment of this site.We want to bring some convenient neighborhood scale retail
services by amending the land use map to mixed residential and commercial land use
designation,which has a couple zones available within it.
I think the City has already set precedent that this mixed res commercial land use designation is
appropriate next to the single family or excuse me,the low density residential land use
designation.That's the case in my neighborhood near Road 68.It was applied on a broad scale
next to the single family land use designation.So,the property owner wants to bring some
neighborhood scale,convenient retail services to the surrounding neighborhoods.Off topic,it's
a very high impact intersection.That's probably not the greatest to live right on that corner.
That really concludes most of my presentation because I want to limit my testimony to truly the
scope of what's being considered tonight.So,I-just want to urge you to place this item on the
docket so that we can talk about it in more detail later.That pine tree there is on the easterly
parcel,that's subject to this application.This is the subject intersection,which,by the way,our
project would probably be required to contribute a signi?cant amount of funding towards
intersection improvements,which I think are needed here.There's the church parking lot across
the street.I've outlined the site so you can get an idea on the size of it.
Three acres,I think,brings it out of the classi?cation of as like a spot zone.Spot zones are more
like a one lot,like a small residential lot.I could go on,but I think that's the limitation of our
purview tonight.I'll leave that up for now.
Commissioner Lehrman asked are your pictures updated with the current Fire station,is that right
below south?That's a little north?North on Road 100.Okay.Shane O’Neill answered these
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 14 September 21,2023
Page 51 of 226
pictures were taken late winter this year.
James Larson 9817 W Star Lane:
I live just south,I have 10ft that butt up to this actual property.I grew up in Pasco,and I always
wanted to live out in Riverview area because of the ambience out there,just to know it's sort of
like country,and I just wanted to have that style that was out there.And this is an encroachment
,I believe.We don't need any commercial convenience.It's close enough up Road 100 to where
the gas station is.That ?rehouse is actually on the other side of that northern housing community.
I want to keep this short.I walked the neighborhood and to talk to people tonight.There were
three that one that said that she would try and make it,but she didn't know where City Council
was,and two others had health concerns.They are opposed.So,there's three others that are
opposed.
I think it destroys the ambience of the immediate neighborhood to put in more commercial.I am
?ne with the church.A church is sort of what community is about.And I know this is not like
the fonnal hearing,so I'm just going to leave it at that.All right,thank you.
Ron Anderson,2909 Road 100:
I live just down from this place.Everything else around there is one acre or half acre lots.
Everything's established,everything's set aside.But this one lot belonged to Don Ford years ago
and several other people in between.I don't know exactly what you hear he plans to do with this.
It's been suggested that he's going to put in a service station,he's going to put apartments in,he's
going to do all kinds of things,but we don't really know because that's not part of this hearing.
And so,it's pretty hard to object to something that you don't even know it's going to happen.But
my feeling is it should stay one acre lots or half acre lots because that's what's around there and
it shouldn't go to 12,000 square foot lots,which is a stupid thing anyway,but you guys do it all
over.
And the only reason I say that is because I‘1nthe retired ?re chief from Franklin County for 30
years and have been gone for about 20 years,and I fought the cul de sacs and I fought all the
dead inroads,and I fought the hydrants and systems.And so,the new additions that you guys are
putting in don't make any sense to me.The one just north of that one only has one entrance going
in and one entrance coming out.And if the hydrant is used at that entrance,there's no way for
those people to get out of that community.See,that wasn't good planning.And I'm worried that
you're going to do something like you did down at 68 in Argent and put in one of those big
whatever they are that would totally ruin the area.So,I'm just totally against it.
Ivan Pruneda 2917 Road 100:
That is my home right there.My entire north side shares the property or boards the property that
is being proposed.I've lived there a little over two years now.The main reason I moved in there
is because just of what Mr.Anderson,Mr.Larson stated.It's a quiet neighborhood.I oppose any
commercial being moved in,especially as close as it is to my home.The pictures Mr.O'Neill has
up here show neighborhood children walking to this road.Right here is Argent,it leads to
McLaughlin and Chiawana High School.We don't need commercial there.It doesn't belong here.
There's plenty of areas for growth within Pasco,and it shouldn't be amongst residential.So,I
oppose it speci?cally where my property is right up there,and the purposes of me moving in
where I did.Thank you.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 14 September 21,2023
Page 52 of 226
Dave Turner 9909 Star Lane:
I live directly behind this property.I for years have tried to get them to clean up those pine trees,
the four dead trees that are along that fence line,to no avail.I've called Pasco Code out,number
of times,?re hazard,I get no response.I don't agree with putting any kind of,I don't know what
he's up to.There has been no proposal yet,but with that much acreage,I'm sure there's going to
be some kind of a business which I am totally against.
We owned,like I said,each one of those acreages were like,I believe,eight tenths of an acre
when they were all broke up years and years and years ago.We would like to divide,we want to
build a house off onto the left hand side of that property,four tenths of an acre there,which we're
looking at right now.I'm just totally against any kind of mall or any kind of business association
out there.I think it should be left to housing.There has been some really nice people.I do
applaud,at least they're starting to clean it up.All of a sudden,they're out there mowing trees
down.They took the ?eld,the ?eld was this high with dead grass.One spark,that would have
been gone.Those pine trees are a real nuisance to me because they're on that fence line,and I
clean up with it every week.
And they did come out years ago.He sent somebody out there to do some work.The idea behind
them was to take a backhoe and reach up to those pine trees and rake the limbs down off onto the
ground and bury them out there in that ?eld.And there's still some hanging there that they broke
off that they never did,but they never did anything with it.And I've always said it,see,that used
to have pine trees down both sides,down on the left side and the right side was all the way to the
road.The woman that lived in there,we had a really bad storm here back in the believe it was.
We had almost 100 miles an hour Windsthat came up,took all those trees down on the side,blew
fences down,roofs off,tore up a lot of property.Those along the back have stayed.And that was
one reason,is because there's a septic tank out there.There's two of them and I'm sure they're
feeding off from that.But I am totally against any kind of businesses going in there.So,I'll just
conclude.
Connie Vance Smith not a resident of Pasco:
Land use plans are my hobby.I'm from Kennewick and I'm here to encourage you to relook at
your criteria.I understand you have looked at them and I do,but I'm here to encourage you to
relook at the criteria and reconsider reopening your land use plan this year for this one item at
all.It's a lot of work and effort and requirements that would have to be met if you're going to
reopen the land use plan.And I don't think it's a good use or appropriate way to use the
comprehensive land use plan for Pasco.I think the criteria in particular that you should reconsider
is whether it's consistent with your land use plan.And maybe I misunderstood your analysis of
that criteria,but online I'm pretty sure I saw,yes,that it's consistent with the land use plan.
And I would just note for the record that there's no pictures at all showing the land use plan in
map with an overlay of this and that if there was,what you would see would be a sea of yellow
and in that sea,a dot of purple and it would be purple.It would be purple standing alone in this
area,there's not purple nearby this,and the yellow,you could probably explain this much better
than I could,but the change would be from yellow to purple.And there is purple above,but it's
quite a way above and it's very consolidated.And the whole pmpose,or one of the main purposes
of a land use plan is to consolidate like uses with other like uses.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 14 September 21,2023
Page 53 of 226
:‘I I I’.E’:
II II I .II I
I.I V |I .'I I I II .I ''
I II
_;II I -
I I
I .:I II .\I II II II-I I
I :1 '
;
I
'
:_;.I I
-I II I 'II I I "''
_J I II .
I..I.
II _I E.I I I I .
v II ''I "I II..I I W.
..II -I:l'
I »_-I -II I I ‘‘‘
I I I ..II ;...I
II II I -I::J ..I
II 'I I I '‘I II I I
_I I I I -.~I -
I.I III 'I I 'I I I
I I 'I
I
..I I
;I-4 II I
I -,I .I I _-II
I -I II I I I "'.I II
_;_I .S =
I
=I I _.,..;-,
II I
..I .—I
...
I I l-I --I
I II
I :I I .I _'
II ..
I
.I
I‘I II I -II .I II -l|.«.
I I I
‘
I I .''-
II "'r
I I II ‘I n’I‘II I "-‘
V I I -I-II
II I I :I IIII II II .|.I ''-’.
III _II I II -.I I -
-I ‘-I -T 'I I I
;
I I II II I .-I ;
II I II 2 :.
I -:III II -'II .'''
-'I I.I ':I
And this actually ?ies in the face of the purpose of land use planning for so many reasons.And
I'lljust highlight a coupleof those here tonight.And the first is that it's putting in a use that is not
really in this area.You have all these homeowners here tonight to tell you this doesn't match what
they were expecting.It doesn't match the size.It just is nota match.Um,there is that purple
designation that is close to the freeway and there's a large block of land set aside for that purpose.
And it would be appropriatefor the City to decide not to open its land use plan,but to encourage
the developer to pick lands that are in the area that's already designated for that purpose or to be
asking to expand arguably,it might be appropriate to ask to expand up by the purple and expand
the purple by the purple or adjacent to it,or touching the existing purple,but not to move it into
the yellow residential zone.
I don't mean to hit that too much.So,this is very piecemeal.And I would just point out to you
also that it apparently is the singular only request this year.So,I would encourage you,even if
you thought maybe somehow this was appropriate,it should be done in another year where there's
more requests and you open things up once for multiple requests,not open everything up for one
request.And it's more important than ever to consider that because of the size of the lot.The
proponent said,one person used the word minor,and this is not minor to anybody who lives
there.But the terminology,I think,was sorry,I'm having problems ?nding the terminology they
used,that this was not a spot zone?This is a spot zone.What I heard,anyway,was this is not a
spot zone because it's not just one lot.No,by golly,it's two lots.But that is exactly the size of
something that amounts to a project,not a land use plan change.
And this project,which this really is a project,this brings us to the point that there's been no
transparency at all about what this project might actually be.The purpose of land use plans is to
avoid nonconforming uses being put in and to avoid this very type of thing where something is
called a land use change,but it's really clearly a project.A project that's being pushed forward
with the people in the area having no transparency at all about what is actually being planned.
And I think that's part of why people who are looking at this have no sense of trust or con?dence
with this development idea,because it's being shielded,it's behind a curtain,what's actually going
on and being planned.
Even if Pasco were to know,we really want to create a postage stamp island of a different use in
this residential area of half acre,one acre houses.Even if you did that,the most logical thing
would be to take it one step further.This is low density housing,so maybe,unfortunately,maybe
this corner would move to medium density housing.There's maybe a shredder iota of sense to
that.But to make this major of a change,no,there's no sense at all in that.
So,this is not minor to anyone who lives in West Pasco.This is one more cut where West Pasco
dies a death by a thousand cuts of ruining the quiet residential area that it was intended to be.So
rather than moving this forward at all,I think that it should be,at a minimum,turned back to the
people who would be recommending it to you to go reevaluate whether this matches the criteria,
because it does not,in my humble opinion,match a reason to open this for land use planning,let
alone zoning.I would ask that this not be moved forward at all and that Pasco consolidate its time
and resources and wait until there are more things before you open your land use plan.And I
appreciate you considering my comments.Thank you very much.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 11 of 14 September 21,2023
Page 54 of 226
Commissioner Mof?tt asked I noticed you're looking down a lot,and you're looking at notes or
something,and you're talking about the land use plant map and stuff.Do you have a picture of
that,or are you just looking at notes?
Connie Van Smith the picture is online.I think it's one of the reasons that this hearing is fatally
?awed and cannot move forward at all is because you're not being presented with a picture of the
map.
Jacob Gonzalez stated,Commissioner,I can attempt to maybe address the question and
certainly the concern that there is a staff acknowledges that there's a lack of the comprehensive
material supplied to the Planning Commission today,in particular,the lack of the land use map
and the underlying zoning map.The colors that the member of the public was mentioning
reference,the purple is the color of mixed residential commercial land use,yellow is the color
for the low density land uses,and those are spread out throughout the City based on the land
use classi?cations determined by the Planning Commission and council and the underlying
applicants over the years.So,staff certainly wants to acknowledge that that information was not
shared with the Planning Commission.We understand that that may present both an unfair
opportunity for members of both the public and the applicant themselves to appropriately
represent their interest.And so,staff certainly understands if this item be continued to October
so that we can come back and apologize to the applicant and members of the public,certainly
for delaying the process,but in an effort to make sure that there is con?dence in the
recommendation made by both the commission and staff that that infonnation be presented to
you fully.
Connie Vance Smith stated I don't think it was provided to the public ahead of the meeting in a
way that was useful enough that it should be presented at this point.
Chair Cochran stated it sounds like what Jacob has suggested is that we come back and continue
this next month.I would remind everyone that this is a part of the process for the comprehensive
plan amendments,and this is a normal part of the process that we go through.And so,if it meets
the eligibility for that process,that's all we're considering.We're not considering.Yes,this is a
done deal.You can build a service station.We're just saying,does it meet the criteria to be
accepted in the criteria for comprehensive plan amendments?But I do agree.I think it sounds
like it's a good idea for us to continue this next month.
Connie Vance Smith continued I'm hoping that before you bring this to public hearing again,that
your criteria will be revised and it will indicate that this is not consistent with the land use plan,
because it is not.And I think if it comes up again and it indicates that that criteria is met,that
could be a real problem.
Ron Anderson Continued:2
Property just north of there where the church is,the remainder part of that vacant land was
dedicated as a school,church school,and it was purchased originally from the school that's now
running off of Road 88 and Court Street,that they use the church there for their school.And so
that property was originally bought from Olsen's Farm,and they sold that front part to that
Christian school,and then the remainder was to be dedicated and build a church school on the
back portions of that.That was the original plan 15 years ago or so.Thank you.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 14 September 21,2023
Page 55 of 226
DDShaneO’Neill re resentin the a licant Continued:
Connie had some great points,but I think they are de?nitely pertinent in the next stage of the
process.I discourage you guys depriving this property owner of his right to this process at this
point just because other people didn't apply.Yeah,it's two lots,but it is three acres.It's very big
and I have other materials that re?ect why this is suitable.It's at the intersection of two arterial
roadways,and that's re?ective of other commercial and high density residential hubs in the City.
This development plan isn't set.I can't tell anybody what will go there.But we have low density
residential,and this mixed residential commercial designation allows for medium density
residential zones.So,I think it's premature to make these assumptions on what will go there.I
just request the Planning Commission this time take my application for further consideration at
the right point in the process.Thank you.
Connie Vance Smith Continued:
I would say no,I disagree.It matters very much that there's only one applicant.It is a lot of work
for the City to open,and it matters very much about the size.And this idea that they can't tell
anyone what will go there really goes to the very point that this is a project.It's not really a land
use issue.Thank you.
James Larson Continued:
Um,my family actually was looking,when that was for sale,to buy that property,to live there at
one time.And my comment is that the owner of those two sites,he can sell those properties.I'm
sure somebody will want to live in that type of environment,and he can buy commercial already
zoned property north on Road 100.That commercial zone is far enough away,but close enough
to where it's convenient,but yet you're not impacted.And I'm sure that the impact of this will
cause more traffic.De?nitely,you're going to have to do something on the comer if a commercial
goes in there.And I think it could even increase because I was talking to people,they said it
could increase crime just by what the environment is.I grew up on Pearl Street,just north of the
post office,and he mentioned it earlier in another thing of the gas station on the comer of Court
Street?That's where Eric Orange shot somebody,gang related shooting,and an innocent
bystander got killed.And that was my neighborhood,and I was hoping to get away from the
commercial and teenagers and kids congregating at these places at night.And that's my rebut,I
guess.
Chair Cochran closed the public hearing.
It was suggested by Jacob Gonazlez and decided by the Planning Commission that this item will
be heard again at a second public hearing in October and more information will be presented to
the Commission at that time.
WORSHOP
None
OTHER BUSINESS
Chair Cochran stated I think we're up for elections of chair,vice chair,and so I think that's next
February.Is that correct?But you can check and come back to us.But for the rest of the
commissioners,if you are thinking about wanting to be chair,vice Chair,now is the time to think
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 13 of 14 September 21,2023
Page 56 of 226
about it.But I think it'll be February.
Jacob Gonzalez stated that he will provide job descriptions no later than the November Planning
Commission meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Cochran stated with no other business,I recommend a motion to adjourn.
Commissioner Hendler made the motion to adjourn the meeting,it was seconded by Commissioner
Lehrman.Passed unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 8:14 pm.
YouTube link to watch full meeting:
Carmen Patrick,Administrative Assistant II
Community &Economic Development Department
Respectfully submitted,
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 14 of 14 September 21,2023
htt s://WWW.outube.com/watch?
Page 57 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council November 15, 2023
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Jacob Gonzalez, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT:Resolution No. 4396 - 2024 HOME Annual Work Plan and Allocation
I.REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Resolution
Planning Commission Minutes Dated 08/17/23
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4396, approving the Federal 2024
HOME Annual Work Plan and Allocation.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
Pasco's share of Federal HOME funds is $279,197 (including program income)
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City of Pasco entered into a HOME Consortium Agreement with the Cities
of Kennewick and Richland in 1996 making the city eligible for federal HOME
funds. Every three (3) years, during the renewal cycle, member cities are given
the opportunity to withdraw from the consortium, make changes to the
cooperative agreement, or select a new Lead Agency. Each member city is
allocated an equal share of the entitlement after 10% set aside for the lead
agency to administer the program which is Richland, and 15% set aside for
Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO).
When funds are allocated, it's important that they are used in compliance with
the regulations set forth by the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, as
well as in alignment with Pasco's own municipal codes and strategic plans. The
City Council's prioritizations to target low-moderate income census tracts (201,
202, 203, and 204) helps ensure that the allocation of these funds is both
strategic and equitable, directing them to areas where they can facilitate
significant improvements in living conditions for low and moderate-income
Page 58 of 226
residents.
If HOME funds cannot be applied to priority areas, then they are used as
needed within the city limits for the benefit of eligible families, allows for
flexibility in addressing the housing needs while still targeting the overall goals
of the City of Pasco's and the HOME program. Previously, the funds were
allocated to provide assistance with down payments and tenant-based rental
subsidies.
As noted in Fiscal Impact, the City of Pasco's share of Federal HOME funds is
$279,197, which includes program income.
V.DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends the approval of the Federal 2024 HOME Annual Work Plan
and Allocation per the recommendation of the Pasco Planning Commission.
This item was discussed at the November 13, 2023 Workshop, based on that
discussion, staff will schedule a Council review of the program and associated
goals prior to the next funding cycle.
Page 59 of 226
Resolution – 2024 HOME Program - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FEDERAL 2024 HOME ANNUAL WORK PLAN AND
ALLOCATION
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) together with the Cities of Kennewick and Richland
renewed 2019 Interlocal Cooperation Agreement continues the participation in the Consortium
originally formed in 1996 under the Home Investments Partnership (HOME) Program through
December 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City has established a Community Housing Improvement Program
(CHIP); and
WHEREAS, $279,197 is expected to be available from entitlement funds and program
income, for Pasco HOME projects in program year 2024.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the 2024 HOME funds received by the City of Pasco shall be allocated to the
Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP) First Time Homebuyer Assistance program,
which operates city-wide with priority given to neighborhood improvement areas and low-
moderate income census tracts, Tenant Based Rental Assistance and Owner-Occupied
Rehabilitation, and
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager or authorize designee is hereby authorized
to sign all agreements in accordance with the Five-Year Consolidate Plan, and Annual Action Plan
Supplements previously approved by council, and
Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution will take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2023.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 60 of 226
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
City Hall - Council Chambers
525 North Third Avenue
Pasco, Washington
THURSDAY, AUGUST 17, 2023
6:30 PM
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 8 August 17, 2023
CALL TO ORDER City of Pasco Planning Commission meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m., by Chair Jerry Cochran. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Cochran led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Rosa Torres, Mitchell Moffitt, Kim Lehrman, Rachel Teel, Paul Mendez, Dana Crutchfield, Jay Hendler and Jerry Cochran, a quorum was declared. Commissioners Excused: Abel Campos Staff Present: Community & Economic Development Director Jacob Gonzalez, Block Grant Administrator Kristin Webb, and Administrative Assistant II Carmen Patrick.
WELCOME AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Chair Cochran explained the Planning Commission is an advisory board made up of volunteers appointed by City Council.
He further explained the purpose of the Planning Commission was to provide recommendations to City Council regarding changes to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Updates, Block Grant Allocations and Zoning Code. The Planning Commission is tasked with considering the long-term
growth and development of the community, the impact of land use decisions on community,
livability, economic opportunity, housing affordability, public services, and the environment.
Chair Cochran reminded the audience tonight’s proceedings were being broadcast live on City of Pasco’s Facebook page and on Charter Cable PSC Channel 191 and will be rebroadcast several times during the next month.
He stated the meeting was also being recorded and could be watched on City of Pasco’s website, which is Pasco-wa.gov. Click on the VIDEO ON DEMAND link and make your selection there. Chair Cochran stated copies of the meeting agenda were available on the back table. He then asked that everyone silence cell phones to prevent interruptions during the meeting. For those present this
evening, when you are given the opportunity to address the Commission, please come to the podium,
speak clearly into the microphone, and state your name and city of address for the record.
Chair Cochran reminded the audience and the Planning Commission that Washington State Law requires public meetings like the one being held this evening not only be fair, but also appear to be fair. In addition, Washington State Law prohibits Planning Commission members from participating
in discussions or decisions in which the member may have a direct interest or may be either benefited or harmed by the Planning Commission’s decision. An objection to any Planning Commission member hearing any matter on tonight’s agenda needs to be aired at this time or it will be waived.
Chair Cochran asked if there were any Planning Commission members who have a declaration at
this time regarding any of the items on the agenda.
Page 61 of 226
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 8 August 17, 2023
No declarations were made. Chair Cochran asked if anyone in the audience objected to any Planning Commission member hearing any of the items on the agenda.
None heard, record shows there were no declarations. Chair Cochran stated the Planning Commission needed and valued public input explaining it helped the Commission understand the issues more clearly and allowed for better recommendations to City
Council. Furthermore, in many cases, this could be the only forum for the public to get facts and
opinions placed into the official record and City Council will use to make the Commission’s decision. He encouraged those present to take full advantage of this opportunity.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Moffitt moved to approve the Planning Commission meeting minutes of July 20, 2023, Commissioner Lehrman seconded, and the motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS
None PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 2024 CDBG Allocations (MF: BGAP2023-003) Kristin Webb reminded to the Commission regarding the CDBG Work Plans background and intent.
She went through the criteria staff will go through regarding the funding possibilities for projects which are scored on:
Council Goals,
Tri-Cities Consortium Consolidated Plan
Partial Funding Possibility for Project
CDBG/HUD Mission
Krtistin broke down by year the totals and percentages that was spent in each goal from years 2020-2023. She stated that staff will come back in September with their recommendations based on these criteria.
Questions from Commissioners: Chair Cochran stated this is great that you did the consolidated score. It'd be great also, if you could remind us next month, maybe another column that has the assessed risk of each case? Then we could weigh their score on the goals against the risks that they present.
Commissioner Lehrman stated looking at the total 20 applicants, there is eight that received a score of five. And out of those eight, half of them end up receiving funding. So maybe having that information might help differentiate what's the difference from a five that received and a five that did not?
Kristin Webb answered we've never done this kind of criteria before. Usually, staff has a meeting, and we go over everything and then something's decided. But yes, we can try and figure that out. Jacob Gonzalez added I wanted to clarify that the amounts that you see here are the average amount
Page 62 of 226
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 8 August 17, 2023
of funds they've received over the past several years, not what the current recommendation is. Commissioner Mendez stated I have a question about form, the risk assessment form. Did you say or did I hear that we got that form from HUD and it's the first time it's being used?
Kristin stated no, we use it every time, we got the form from HUD. This is HUD's form for us to use. For scoring yes, the criteria, the way we're scoring them is new, but not the form itself.
Commissioner Lehrman commented, so one more question. Looking through the 2023 CBG funds,
the very bottom pie chart. So, with 43% being the economic opportunities for the goals that fit that, would you say that that category may possibly have a stronger weight than some of the other goals? Kristin Webb answered, over the past several years, we have actually had more people apply for public service activities. The economic opportunity one is usually our incubator kitchen, which is
PSK downtown, and then also Public Works projects. So, they just happen to get a little bit more funding than the other applicants. Public Hearing:
• Angie Pacheco, Domestic Violence Services of Benton and Franklin Counties: Good evening. My name is Angie Pacheco, and I reside in the City of Pasco, and I work at Domestic Violence Services of Benton and Franklin Counties in Kennewick, Washington. Just to give a little bit of service identity of what we provide. We provide a 24 hour crisis line that's
bilingual, shelter services to domestic violence clients where we can service up to 22 persons in one of our shelters located in Richland. And we help with support in the legal system with clients when they're moving forward in reference to any of the restraining orders that they may need help with. Housing assistance for rent, utilities, and deposits to our clients, food, and
transportation funding.
We recently opened a thrift store to provide job skills to our clients and to youth in the community. And we are opening up a new affordable housing program with ten units in Richland and then our outreach to the community. We applied for extended services for outreach to the community in Pasco. We've been servicing the Tri-Cities out of Benton County
for over 20 years. This is our 20 year anniversary, and we wanted to bring a presence to the City of Pasco and Franklin County, so we had an opportunity to service more families. We did apply for $70,000, and we would be looking for funding for up to $30,000 to sustain
the program. This would be to hire two members of the community in Pasco that fit your criteria
on creating jobs for low income persons. So, there would be two jobs that would be created out of this application, and then 800 individuals is what we intend to service, principally under the benefit of lower income persons. That's your number one goal. So, we're trying to meet the goal of number one and number three for the City of Pasco application that we submitted. Thank you.
• Steve Allen, YMCA: Good evening, I'm Steve Allen. I'm with the YMCA of Tri Cities. I reside in Kennewick,
responsible for the operation at the Martin Luther King Center for the Y. And I specifically
Page 63 of 226
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 8 August 17, 2023
want to address a question that came up by Mr. Moffitt about adult programming. I think Jeff Morrow alluded to it, but we've got about 500 adults that participate in the program over for the King Center. The King Center is run predominantly for youth, but it's open for everybody. So, the weight room, the gym, will do drop in basketball, we see 500 members, and then we
see a whole lot of people come in on a day pass. We're probably looking about 800 adults that come in throughout the year to use the facilities with the kids, and it's quite often the parents and kids coming together. We'll find one of the
kids in the computer lab, mom or dad working out, somebody playing basketball and then
coming back together. So, it's a small mini YMCA that brings them all together, but obviously the focus is on the kids and has been since about 1983. Thank you. Chair Cochran closed the public hearing.
Jacob Gonzalez added what we wanted to do this year was spend a little bit more time, this evening in particular, to address any concerns, comments or questions from the commission or members of the public regarding the criteria. As Ms. Webb mentioned, there's a gap of $1.8 million in what we have available versus the total request.
Chair Cochran stated excellent, and honestly, I think that's one of the things that's bothered me in previous years is there is no rhyme or reason on an objective measure on how we're arriving at our decisions. And at least it's defensible that we're basing and aligning our decisions with a criteria and a scoring based on that criteria versus, well, I think this one sounds good, versus, hey, this one actually has a high score and the risk is where it should be. Right? So those are the kind of the factors
I like that, but I'll open it up. If any of the Commissioners have questions about the criteria that Ms. Webb went over, this is a way to be a good time to give feedback or ask. We can do that. Commissioner Lehrman stated I don't have a question; I do have a compliment though. So, when
you're more transparent with the public and the opportunity for them to be able to learn and be able
to make correction in the future, and then when those are awarded, they can be able to share out how they got there, what part of the rubric did they fit into the goals. So, thank you very much for your transparency. Commissioner Torres added sorry, I just wanted to make sure that I was understanding the criteria,
especially the ones for the Council goals. I guess the way that we're scoring it is all of the goals have equal weight, right? Kristin Webb answered yes, they are all equal.
B. Housing Action and Implementation Plan
Jacob Gonzalez went over the background of the Housing Action and Implementation Plan. He
informed the committee that the City’s population is estimated to reach 143,657 by the year 2045 and that Pasco’s total housing needs by then will require more than 230,000 homes. Recommended Strategies:
Removing regulatory barriers and encourage the development of a variety of housing types
Page 64 of 226
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 8 August 17, 2023
Increase opportunities for homeownership
Expand the supply and increase access to affordable housing
Build housing for Pasco’s special population groups
Mitigate displacement of vulnerable residents
Commissioners were given the Draft Housing Action Plan for their review and recommendation. Staff is coordinating a fourth stakeholder workshop that will occur between the Planning Commission and Council action on the plan, to ensure that the recommended draft plan adequately
addresses all comments received.
Next Steps:
August: Planning Commission Recommendation
September: 4th Housing Stakeholder Workshop
September-October: City Council
Questions from Commissioners: Chair Cochran asked can you remind us what the Commerce Grant provides?
Jacob Gonzalez stated essentially, the requirement was to put together a comprehensive housing
action plan. So, tell us what your demands are, tell us what your needs are, and tell us some strategies of how you're going to attempt to address those. So, the City of Pasco was fortunate that we applied. We received the full request of $100,000 to pay for the consultant team and the consultant team to help us with all the outreach and engagement efforts as well. This is the result of all that effort.
Commissioner Moffitt confirmed that the average rent encompasses all types of rentals, apartments, duplexes, and single family homes, and that the date was 2045. He asked does the city limits encompass enough vacant land that would allow that to happen or is the city looking at expanding its borders? And how would that affect housing prices.
Jacob Gonzalez when the City of Pasco developed that Comprehensive Plan, we looked at the housing capacity analysis, so a buildable lands analysis, how much vacant land exists and of that vacant land, how much of it is reasonable to actually consider for housing? A lot of it is landlocked, a lot of it doesn't have adequate infrastructure. So that limits what kind of housing can be built there, if any, at the first place. Once we figured out what that gap was, then we needed to look at expanding
our Urban Growth Area. And so, in September or so of 2021, our Urban Growth Area was approved by the Franklin County, which is the state requirement for counties to approve. Our forecast had estimated that at that time, if we made certain policy regulations that have since been adopted, that we could accommodate the housing growth that Pasco was expecting to receive over the next 18 to
20 years, which at that time was about a forecast year of 2040.
So, we have another five years to work with. It is likely that we will begin looking at our Urban Growth Area and a Housing Capacity Analysis as part of our next comprehensive plan, which this commission will be heavily involved with. So, I think we're there, but we're going to need to take another look at it because it's always changing.
Regarding the housing prices the lack of supply is going to increase the cost of housing, just like it would any good.
Page 65 of 226
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 8 August 17, 2023
Commissioner Lehrman asked has your department looking into the middle housing grant that just recently came out of the Washington Department of Commerce? And, as we talk about a variety of houses, I haven’t seen the word “Condo” ever used, can you share out the why behind that? What is
the difference between a condo and a townhouse, which we have here in Pasco. Jacob Gonzalez answered we have looked into it, and we are going to apply even though we’ve already adopted some pretty good codes, but it doesn’t help to make our code better, so we will look
into that further. And second, years ago there was some strict liability regulations placed on condos
so around the state, there was a significant decrease in developers wanting to do condos because of the liabilities associated with them. The legislature this year did pass at least one bill that attempted to address that. I don't know what the result of that is going to be, but the intent was to at least re allow more condo construction to be attractive in the first place. Lastly, townhomes are typically on their own lot and share a wall, whereas condos can be three, four, five story building, so you share
more than just a wall. Chair Cochran suggested council know how we are succeeding at our strategies and how it is measured.
Commissioner Torres asked what would we be putting at risk for our community if we don’t have an effective housing plan? Jacob Gonzles stated absolutely. In fact, what we know so far during the findings portion of the housing plan was that the median sale price is only affordable to one profession in the City of Pasco,
which is folks working in the information and technology sector. One of the tasks that we've asked our consultant to look at is to forecast what that means throughout the next 20 years. So, if we know that we're growing more in food service and retail than information technology, does that mean that we're going to have more folks not able to afford the median home price in the city of Pasco? Because
that's just the way our economic job opportunities are growing. That'll be a significant part of our
economic development strategy, which we're working on as well. Commissioner Lehrman stated I love what you're sharing about trying to go back and get the information to be able to quantify who can be able to afford the future homes. And so, if you could turn that to a graphic, that would be wonderful to be able to share out, and I think more people would
be able to see, this is where I'm at. This is how many I know can be in that small little zone in 2045. So, thank you. Public Hearing
• Peter Harpster, Aqtera Engineering, 2815 St. Lewis Loop, Ste. C I spoke last month on this, so I won't repeat any comments. But one thing that I do like with this plan is we're working on several different developments and projects, from garden style apartments to duplexes single family homes and multifamily housing projects. And when
deciding what kind of project, we're going to do, typically asking what's the highest and best use of the land, you guys are faced with that question often, and having a housing plan like this is super helpful in making those decisions.
Page 66 of 226
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 8 August 17, 2023
We can look at the data, like Director Gonzalez said, and make informed decisions. That said, you know what? Let's do single family homes here for whatever reason, because we've done in the past, we can look at the data and say, okay, there's a segment of population that needs housing that's more towards the lower end and housing that's towards the higher end as well.
And so, we appreciate the data like that that's contained in this plan and definitely in favor of the plan and appreciate the involvement from staff and would recommend that Planning commission make a vote of recommendation to move forward to the council so we can kind of wrap this up and looking forward to the last workshop meeting.
• Rebecca Francik, Basin Disposal I really appreciate not only the packet you put out but your thoughtful discussion, my comments are really tangential to this. We have a garbage company and we run by your house every single week. As you are looking at new different kinds of housing, we fully applaud
that. We know it's necessary in Pasco, but we ask that you keep garbage pickup in mind as you do it. Chair Cochran closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Lehrman stated she hadn’t heard nor seen anything in the packet regarding SRO’s. Jacob Gonzalez answered SROs have been an active conversation amongst our council. In fact, on Monday we presented an update on the status of the SRO projects, not only in Pasco, but in our region. Single occupancy housing right now is under a moratorium that is set to expire on
September 7. Staff is in recommendation of removing that moratorium. SROs are typically seen as one tool in the toolkit of sorts for housing. There have been some concerns, and I think rightfully so, about the intention of SROs is that they offer more affordable units available for folks at different points of their life.
Fortunately, those SROs are also renting at market prices. So we're seeing SROs right up around that 1200 or so median price point, but we have looked into that. A lot of them are offering one month off, two month off, three month off. So it although initially is single room occupancy housing, it can either be a tiny studio apartment or a unit that has shared facilities like kitchenettes, etc., multiple on the same floor. We have two in Pasco. One is in operation and we have a second
one that is in construction right now. Chair Cochran asked between now and 2045, there will be other options to extend that and even have more land and types of land. Is that correct or incorrect?
Jacob Gonzalez stated there certainly will be opportunities for us to evaluate and apply and request expansions. Whether those expansions are granted or appealed is a different story. I would expect,
though, that urban growth areas will be subject at the state level over the next several years as we
deal with the housing crisis and just the rapid population growth. Commissioner Crutchfield asked, I have a question on strategy one. It talks about removing regulatory barriers, and I wondered if there could be more specific about some of those because some of those may be somewhat of a protection to guide development. I would like to have more
information about because that's pretty general.
Page 67 of 226
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 8 August 17, 2023
Jacob Gonzales answered the document itself goes into refined detail about what each of these strategies includes, and we presented on those back in July. With regards to impact fees, though. Impact fees has been one of the biggest barriers that's been shared by our housing community as a
barrier to new construction because it puts all of the costs up front, meaning it's on the shoulders of the developer and the builder to shoulder the significant cost which are necessary to obviously construct schools or accommodate new vehicle traffic or new parks, for example.
But the challenge is that typically those are required at the front of the project, meaning the
moment they come in and get a permit just to start their project, the fees are due. Yet they don't know whether those projects are going to be completed because there's always a risk with the project. They don't know at the level that they may have an indication about what they may sell at or rent at, but there's never a guarantee. And so, the city of Pasco is actively working with school district to see if there's a deferral that may be an option for larger projects to take advantage of a
deferral. So not an elimination, but a deferral. So, paying at a later time, but guaranteeing that both the impact fee is paid but done so at a time that doesn't, I guess, restrict or be overburdensome to a project in particular.
Commissioner Torres moved to close the public hearing on the Draft Housing Action and
Implementation Plan and recommend the Pasco City Council adopt the draft plan as contained in the August 17, 2023, staff report. Commissioner Lehrman seconded the motion, the motion passed unanimously.
WORSHOP None OTHER BUSINESS
Each member was given a copy of the Downtown Master Plan book. Fiery Food Festival announcement; is schedule for September 9, 2023 downtown Pasco. Pasco’s very first National Parking Day is September 15, and will have outdoor dining at the Pasco Specialty Kitchen
ADJOURNMENT Chair Cochran stated with no other business, I recommend a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Lehrman made the motion to adjourn the meeting, it was seconded by Commissioner Crutchfield. Passed unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 7:33 pm. YouTube link to watch full meeting: Pasco Planning Commission, August 17, 2023 - YouTube Respectfully submitted,
Carmen Patrick, Administrative Assistant II
Community & Economic Development Department
Page 68 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council November 14, 2023
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Steve Worley, Public Works Director
Public Works
SUBJECT:Resolution No. 4397 - Approval of Department of Health Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Construction Funding Application for
West Pasco WTP Improvements Project
I.REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4397, authorizing the submittal of
the Department of Health Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Loan
Application for the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant, Phase 3 & 4 project for
an amount of up to $12,000,000.00.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
Maximum award of $12,000,000 per jurisdiction, 2.25% interest rate, 20-year
loan term, with a 1% non-refundable loan fee at loan execution.
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The 2019 Comprehensive Water System Plan identified needed improvements
to the West Pasco WTP to get to a reliable capacity of 18 Million Gallons per
day (MGD). Currently Phase 2 is in construction. Phase 3 & 4 include the
design and construction of improvements to increase production from 12MGD
to 18MGD.
Staff identified an opportunity to partially fund this project by means of a low-
interest construction loan through the Washington State Department of Health
(DOH), Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) program. The DWSRF
funding program exists to provide loans for drinking water system infrastructure
improvements to publicly-owned drinking water systems. This program
includes both federal and state money subject to state laws and additional
federal regulations. These loans are intended for capital improvements that
Page 69 of 226
increase public health and compliance with drinking water regulations. As
currently advertised, DWSRF 20-year construction loans have a 2.25% interest
rate, with a maximum award of $12,000,000 per jurisdiction, with a 1% service
fee upon execution. Applications for construction loans are due on November
30, 2023.
Previous Phases of West Pasco WTP Improvements were partially funded
through DWSRF, with positive results for both DOH and the City in the
utilization of this financial assistance program.
Applications for DWSRF loans require authorization of the legislative body,
staff recommends approval.
V.DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends Council approval for the submittal of a DWSRF construction
low-interest loan application to the Department of Health for the West Pasco
WTP project. Council action, in the form of a resolution, is sufficient to meet
funding application requirements.
Page 70 of 226
Resolution - DWSRF Construction Loan App for West Pasco WTP Expansion Project - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A DRINKING WATER STATE
REVOLVING FUND LOAN APPLICATION FOR THE WEST PASCO WATER
TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION PROJECT FOR A LOAN AMOUNT OF
UP TO $12,000,000.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) presently provides domestic water to more than
80,000 citizens; and
WHEREAS, the City relies on the Columbia River for its domestic raw water supply; and
WHEREAS, the West Pasco Water Treatment Plan (West Pasco WTP) provides
approximately one-quarter of the City’s potable water; and
WHEREAS, the 2019 Comprehensive Water System Plan identified needed
improvements to the West Pasco WTP in order to increase water filtration capacity from 12 Million
Gallons per Day (MGD) to 18 MGD; and
WHEREAS, to help fund these improvements, the City would like to pursue a construction
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan with 2.25% interest loan rate, for a
maximum award of $12,000,000; and
WHEREAS, the loan agreement has a term of 20-years and a one percent (1%) service fee
upon execution; and
WHEREAS, applications for DWSRF loans require authorizations of the legislative body.
WHEREAS, if the City is selected as a recipient for the DWSRF loan, the loan agreement
will be subject to City Council review and approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council, of the City of Pasco, hereby authorizes the submittal of the
construction loan application to the DWSRF for the West Pasco WTP Expansion Project and;
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution will take effect immediately.
Page 71 of 226
Resolution - DWSRF Construction Loan App for West Pasco WTP Expansion Project - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of
November, 2023.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 72 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council November 14, 2023
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Steve Worley, Public Works Director
Public Works
SUBJECT:Resolution No. 4398 - Approval of the Washington State Public Works
Board WTP Butterfield for Loan Pre-Construction Application
Improvements Project
I.REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4398, authorizing the submittal of
the Public Works Board Pre-Construction Loan application for the Butterfield
Water Treatment Plant Improvements project.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
Maximum award of $1,000,000 per jurisdiction, 5-year loan term.
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City’s potable water is provided by two different water treatment plants.
The Butterfield Water Treatment Plant (WTP) was originally constructed in
1946 and produces approximately three-quarters of the City’s drinkable water.
The for critical is that residents, treated provides WTP Butterfield water
businesses, industrial users, and fire suppression systems. Drinking water
plants have a typical service life of 50-80 years. Although the Butterfield WTP
has undergone several expansions and upgrades since its original
construction, most of the core components of the plant were constructed
between 65 and 75 years ago.
The Butterfield WTP Facility Plan (Plan) was completed by Carollo Engineers.
The development of the Plan involved a multi-year process that established
performance goals for the plant, reviewed past water quality issues, evaluated
plant performance and condition, evaluated alternatives for plant processes,
and developed a Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) that included repair and
Page 73 of 226
replacement projects for the Butterfield WTP.
For the engineering design of the facility, the City selected Jacobs Engineers,
Inc. to implement the needed improvements as recommended in the Butterfield
WTP Facility Plan,
Council previously approved staff pursuing a Department of Health low-interest
Pre-Construction loan of $500,000, which was awarded to the City. Staff
continues to identify opportunities to fund the WTP improvement projects by
means of low-interest loans.There is currently another opportunity for low-
interest loans through the Washington State Public Works Board (PWB)
Traditional Programs.
The PWB Traditional Programs makes funds available to counties, cities, and
special purpose districts to repair, replace, or create infrastructure. Projects
funded regulations. and state to laws are program this through subject
Applications for Pre-Construction loans are accepted year round while the
Construction loans funding cycle is anticipated to open in Spring 2024. The
next application deadline for the Pre-Construction loan is January 5, 2024.
Pre-Construction while loans are for pre-construction activities only a
construction loan may include a combination of pre-construction and
construction elements. Pre-Construction and Construction loans may be
obtained for the same project, but a separate application must be submitted for
each loan type.
Applications for PWB Traditional Programs funds require authorization of the
legislative body.
Should the City be selected as a recipient for a PWB Traditional Programs
loan, the loan agreement will be subject to Council review and approval.
V.DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends Council approval for the submittal of a pre-construction low-
interest loan application to the Public Works Board for the Butterfield Water
Treatment Plant Improvements project. Council action, in the form of a
resolution, is sufficient to meet funding application requirements.
Page 74 of 226
Resolution - PWB PreCon Loan App Butterfield WTP Project - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A PUBLIC WORKS BOARD LOAN
APPLICATION FOR THE BUTTERFIELD WATER TREATMENT PLANT
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the Butterfield Water Treatment Plant (WTP), originally built in 1946,
having been expanded and improved through the years has reached the end of its useful life; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) completed the Butterfield WTP Facilities Plan,
which defines a capital improvement strategy to address capacity, water quality, safety, and end-
of-life deficiencies; and
WHEREAS, to help fund these improvements, the City is requesting authorization to
submit an application for a low-interest pre-construction loan with the Public Works Board (PWB);
and
WHEREAS, the PWB Pre-Construction and Construction Loan Program makes funds
available to counties, cities, and special purpose districts to repair, replace, or create infrastructure.
This program is funded through federal and state money and subject to state and federal
regulations; and
WHEREAS, the PWB loan application process requires documentation of City Council
approval of the submittal of a PWB loan application; and
WHEREAS, as currently advertised, PWB pre-construction loans have a 1.72% interest
rate; and
WHEREAS, if the City is selected as a recipient for the PWB pre-construction loan, the
loan agreement will be subject to City Council review and approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council, of the City of Pasco, hereby authorizes the submittal of the pre-
construction loan application to the PWB for the Butterfield WTP Improvements Project.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution will take effect immediately.
Page 75 of 226
Resolution - PWB PreCon Loan App Butterfield WTP Project - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of
___________, 2023.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 76 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council November 13, 2023
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Steve Worley, Public Works Director
Public Works
SUBJECT:Resolution No. 4399 - Bid Award for Oregon Avenue Overlay (SR397)
Project
I.REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4399, awarding the construction
contract for Bid No. 21305 - Oregon Avenue Overlay (SR397) Project to
Central Washington Asphalt, Inc. of Moses Lake, Washington in the amount of
$2,520,000, and further, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract
documents.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
Proposed Bid Award: $2,520,000.00
Funded through NHS Asset management Program (Federal Grant)
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City is in receipt of a federal grant, National Highway System Preservation
Program (NHSPP), for Pavement Preservation for Oregon Avenue (SR 397)
from the WSDOT boundary of Interstate 182 to E. Ainsworth Avenue. Although
the original grant award included a match requirement, federal funding is now
provided at 100% for this Project.
Improvements include planning bituminous pavement, fiber reinforced HMA,
pavement repair, curb ramps, sidewalk, curb and gutter, storm drain
improvements, pavement markings, and other associated work.
Page 77 of 226
V.DISCUSSION:
The Project was advertised for bids on October 13th and October 20th, 2023.
On November 8th, 2023 bids were publicly opened at 2:00 p.m. As part of the
competitive formal bidding processes, a total of three (3) bids were received.
The lowest responsive bid was submitted by Central Washington Asphalt, Inc.
of Moses Lake, WA in the amount of $2,520,000.00. The Engineer's Estimate
is $2,697,483.00.
Bid Tabulation
Central Washington Asphalt $2,520,000.00
Inland Asphalt Company $3,000,000.00
Granite Construction Company $3,068,518.00
City Staff completed the review of the bid submittal and found no exemptions
or irregularities.
City Staff recommends award of the bid to Central Washington Asphalt, Inc. of
Moses Lake, WA.
Page 78 of 226
Resolution - Oregon Ave Overlay Bid Award - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AWARDING BID NO. 21305 FOR THE OREGON AVENUE OVERLAY
(SR397) PROJECT TO CENTRAL WASHINGTON ASPHALT, INC. OF
MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) identified the Oregon Avenue Overlay (SR397)
Project in the approved Capital Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, this Contract provides for asphalt overlay, pavement repair, curb ramps,
sidewalk, curb and gutter, storm drain improvements, pavement markings, and other associated
work along the corridor of Oregon Avenue from the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) boundary of Interstate 182 to E. Ainsworth Avenue, and
WHEREAS, the City solicited sealed public bids for this project, identified as the Oregon
Avenue Overlay (SR397) Project; and
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2023, at 2:00 p.m., three (3) bids were received and opened
by the City; and
WHEREAS, the lowest responsive bidder was Central Washington Asphalt, Inc. with a
bid of $2,520,000.00, the Engineer’s Estimate was $2,697,518.00; and
WHEREAS, the bid documentation was reviewed, and the bidder was determined to be
responsible and responsive.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City hereby awards the Oregon Avenue Overlay (SR397) Project to Central
Washington Asphalt, Inc. of Moses Lake, Washington, in the amount of $2,520,000.00; and further
authorizes the City Manager to execute the Contract documents.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take affect and be in full force
immediately upon passage by the City Council.
Page 79 of 226
Resolution - Oregon Ave Overlay Bid Award - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
202_.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 80 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council November 1, 2023
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT:*Resolution No. 4400 - Acceptance of Work for Schlagel Park -Parking
Lot and Boat Ramp Improvements
I.REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
Vicinity Map
PowerPoint Presentation
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4400, accepting work performed
by Goodman and Mehlenbacher Enterprises Inc. of Kennewick, Washington,
under contract for Schlagel Park- Parking Lot and Boat Ramp Improvements
Project No. 16999.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
Total Payment to Goodman and Mehlenbacher Enterprises Inc.: $1,852,742.26
This project was funded through a State of Washington Recreation
Conservation Office (RCO) Grant and local funds.
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Schlagel Park - Parking Lot and Boat ramp Improvements Project, Project
16999, project bid was awarded by Council action to Goodman and
Mehlenbacher Enterprises Inc. (GAME Inc.), of Kennewick WA on August 1,
2022, in the amount of $1,699,995.11. The project is now complete and was
constructed per project specifications. Final Construction costs paid were
$1,852,742.26, after the approval of 3 change orders.
Change orders (CO) for the project included:
Page 81 of 226
CO No.1 ($41,554.06): Remove an island of asphalt and subgrade in the
parking lot that was not part of the original contract.
CO No.2 ($5,706.63): Reconfigure the water line tie in to remove abandoned
water service lines going to the park.
CO No.3 ($100,298.92): Tax modification- upon review it was found the scope
of this project does comply with the "Public Road Construction" definition per
Department of Revenue and is, therefore subject to Sales tax. This change
order accounts for the necessary sales tax to the project.
The project is complete and the materials and workmanship meets the
standards specified in the contract documents.
V.DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed Resolution accepting the work
performed by Goodman and Mehlenbacher Enterprises Inc. for the
Construction of the Schlagel Park - Parking lot and Boat Launch Improvements
Project.
Page 82 of 226
Resolution – Schlegel Park Project Acceptance- 1
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY GOODMAN AND MEHLENBACHER
ENTERPRISES INC., UNDER CONTRACT FOR THE SCHLAGEL PARK
PARKING LOT AND BOAT RAMP IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the work performed by Goodman and Mehlenbacher Enterprises Inc.
(GAME Inc.), under contract for Project No. 16999 has been examined by City of Pasco (City)
staff and been found to be in apparent compliance with the applicable project specifications and
drawings, and
WHEREAS, it is the City staff’s recommendation that the City formally accept the
contractor's work and the project as complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council concurs with the City staff’s recommendation and thereby accepts
the work performed by Goodman and Mehlenbacher Enterprises Inc., under contract for Project
No. 16999 as being completed in apparent conformance with the project specifications and
drawings, and
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington
State Department of Revenue of this acceptance, and
Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld, pursuant to
RCW 60.28.011, regulations and administrative process, shall be released upon apparent
compliance with and satisfaction of applicable project specifications and verification thereof by
Public Works Department staff and Finance Director.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution will take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
202_.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 83 of 226
P OJECT LOCATION
Page 84 of 226
Pasco City Council Regular
Meeting
November 20, 2023Page 85 of 226
Schlagel Park –Parking Lot and Boat ramp
Improvements Project # 16999
Contract awarded on August 15, 2022,
to Goodman & Mehlenbacher
Enterprises, Inc. for $1,699,995.11 Page 86 of 226
Schlagel Park –Parking Lot and Boat ramp Improvements
Before
Page 87 of 226
Schlagel Park –Parking Lot and Boat ramp Improvements
In Progress
Page 88 of 226
Schlagel Park –Parking Lot and Boat Ramp Improvements
In Progress
Page 89 of 226
Schlagel Park –Parking Lot and Boat Ramp Improvements
After
Final Construction Cost:$1,852,742.26
Change Orders: $152,747.15Page 90 of 226
Questions?Page 91 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council November 15, 2023
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Darcy Buckley, Finance Director
Finance
SUBJECT:Ad Valorem Tax (Property Tax) and General Fund Revenue
Presentation
I.REFERENCE(S):
Property Tax and General Fund Revenue Presentations
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presentation of Ad Valorem (Property Tax) Process by Franklin County
Assessor John A. Rosenau
Presentation of City of Pasco General Fund Revenue by Finance Director
Darcy Buckley
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
Council decision sets the City's share of the Ad Valorem (Property Tax) rate for
2024 collections. Based on State law, the City has the option to increase its
property tax budget by the lesser of the Implicit Price Deflator (IDP) or one
percent (1%). The availability of prior years' banked levy capacity for years
where no levy increase was approved can be included in the levy budget for
the coming tax year, 2024. Therefore, three options for property tax collection
budget for year 2024 exist.
1. If no increase is approved, only new properties identified by Franklin
County Assessor's Office will provide additional property tax revenue in
2024.
2. If the allowance for a one percent (1%) increase is approved, additional
tax revenue of $131,528 is added to the City's budget.
3. Finally, with the inclusion of the banked capacity, levy amount increases
by an additional $596,758.
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The General Fund is the primary administrative and operational fund of the
City. As compared to the City-wide budget, activity recorded in the General
Page 92 of 226
Fund represents 33% of revenues. Therefore, reviewing the results of current
activity is valuable for making budgetary projections and ad valorem (property)
tax decisions. While prudent to undertake this analysis, RCW 84.55.120 also
requires a public hearing be conducted on General Fund revenue sources for
the coming year’s budget, including possible increases in the City’s property
tax levy.
Following the revenue hearing, Council may pass an ordinance that authorizes
an increase in the property tax levy for the coming year, 2024. The statutory
increase in the levy is limited to the lessor of inflation, as measured by the
Implicit Price Deflator or, one percent increase. Any increase approved is
applied to the highest lawful levy to date. IPD as an economic measurement
differs from the Consumer Price Index, or CPI. Unlike the CPI, the IPD rate is
not based on a fixed basket of goods and services in a specified region.
Instead, the goods and services included in the IPD basket considers national
inputs. The rate is also influenced by consumption and investment patterns.
The IPD as of September 25, 2023 is 3.67%. Additionally, the State statutory
limit on City levy rate is $3.60 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. The City of
Pasco valuation, assessed of per $1.288 $1,000 2023 for rate levy is
significantly below the statutory limit.
While property tax is a significant portion of General Fund revenue, projected
to be 14.4% of General Fund revenue the 2023 - 2024 Biennium, other
General Fund revenues include sales tax, utility tax, fees and charges for
services, fines and penalties, and licenses and permits. Ultimately, where one
revenue source is lower, another must be increased to make up revenue
requirements to support General Fund service provision.
Other General Fund revenue sources exist that are variable and dependent
upon are sale, property examples or events. infrequent uncertain Some
refunds, interest earnings, donations, and transfers in from other funds for
unique projects.
Those services typically viewed as governmental in nature are the same
services revenues. supported by property tax assessments and resulting
Specifically, services commonly viewed as essential government services, like
public safety services of police and fire are funded by property taxes. Property
tax revenue is a stable and reliable source to support ongoing functions like
public safety. Parks and recreation functions and City sponsored community
events also benefit from the collection of property taxes. Finally, the functions
of City administration, finance, technological support and tools, and a myriad of
other “internal services" are funded partially from the dollars provided by
property tax revenues. As outlined in the Capital Improvement Plan, other
governmental type funds, and their capital projects, benefit from support of
General Fund revenues and the funding provided by property taxes.
Page 93 of 226
Franklin County Assessor’s Office has provided values of new construction,
state assessed utility, tax increment area and assessed value figures that
make up the levy calculation.
V.DISCUSSION:
Historically, Council has evaluated property tax levy decisions based on current
and planned needs. For example, in 2018, Council determined to capture the
City’s banked levy capacity from prior years to fund capital improvements like
those undertaken at Fire Stations 83 and 84. For the years, 2019 through
2022, the assessment of a one percent levy increase was declined and the
capacity banked.
Actual and planned community growth over the past couple of years has been
robust. Growth, and related demand for services, precedes revenue collection
often. Reflective of those influences, the 2023-2024 biennial budget resulted in
a net decrease of fund balance at the rate of $10 million during the biennium,
the fund balance decrease includes anticipated $5 million in sale of property. A
major budgeted cost increase is reflected in the additional of Broadmoor Area
Tax Incremental Financing debt service of $5.2M. Other factors influencing the
increased expense budget for the biennium are the addition of City staff and
capital purchases and project spending.
General fund revenues recognized in the first ten months of the biennium are
mostly meeting budgetary expectations. The most notable exception is sale tax
revenue. The receipts recognized reflect sales through approximately July of
2023. Sales tax revenues for 2023 are approximately 10% greater than those
received in 2021, but 10% lower than 2022 receipts as measured at the same
time of each year. In examination of the source of taxation, construction related
sales tax is lower than anticipated. When setting the budget for 2023 - 2024
sales tax revenue, large scale construction projects were anticipated. Many of
those construction projects started in the later months of 2023 and have not yet
contributed to sales tax revenue collection thought activity of August. Aware of
the remaining construction, and related tax impact, in 2024 a change to
revenue budget is not warranted.
Known budgetary additions for this biennium include debt service for the bonds
issued in September of 2023. Debt service expenses, including principal and
interest payments, for the Fire Station 85 project are included in the biennial
budget. However, new cost must be added related to bond proceeds for the
Animal Shelter Annex Improvements, Memorial Pool Annex Improvements and
Gesa Stadium Improvements. The increase in annual debt service averages
$434,000 over the next 20 years. Another anticipated amendment to the 2023-
2024 biennial budget is the cost associated with the unanticipated City
assumption of operational control of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen and Pasco
Farmer's Market and related events.
Page 94 of 226
For Council's consideration, the following property tax options are presented.
Included are no levy increase, a one percent increase, or the combined
increase of one percent plus recognition of banked capacity. While the City
levy will include property value for Tax Increment Areas (TIF), collections
associated with the Port of Pasco TIF area will be remitted to the Port.
Option A: No Increase
This option declines the statutorily allowed one percent increase in the City
property tax levy. Instead, given this option, the City will bank the capacity to
levy the additional value in the future. Important to this decision is the
consideration that the City is not able nor has oversight to ensure that its
banked capacity remains intact. Based on record-keeping of the Assessor’s
Office it is possible, even if unlikely, that breakdown in process or clerical error
could result in a loss of formerly bank capacity. Another important factor to
consider when banking levy capacity is the impact of assessed value. As
assessed value in the City grows, the value of the banked capacity decreases.
The effect of new construction adds to the overall assessed valuation of the
City. As assessed value is the denominator by which the levy rate is calculated,
an increase serves to reduce the levy rate.
This estimate reflects an increase of $ 519,710 over the 2023 levy amount for
unrestricted General Fund use. This change is the product of the estimated
increase in assessed valuation primarily due to addition of new properties in
2023. Based upon the calculation of estimated new construction and the
increased assessed valuation, the levy rate for Option A is $1.076 per $1,000
assessed value. This new levy rate is $0.212 less than the rate applied in
2023.
Option B: 1% Statutory Increase
This estimate includes the addition of the one percent statutory limit, or
$131,528. The total levy amount increase with this option is estimated at
$651,238. The levy rate resulting from this calculation is $1.086 per $1,000
assessed value. Based on this calculation, the 2024 levy rate will be $0.202
per $1,000 assessed value less than the amount levied in 2023.
Option C: 1% Statutory Increase and Existing Banked Capacity
This estimate includes the addition of the one percent statutory limit, or
$131,528 plus recapture of banked value of $596,758. The total levy amount
increase with this option is estimated at $1.247M. The levy rate resulting from
this calculation is $1.135 per assessed value. Based on this calculation, the
2024 levy rate will be $0.153 less than the amount levied in 2023.
Page 95 of 226
In order for the Franklin County Assessor to levy property taxes, the City is
required to certify property tax levies with the County by November 30th of
each year.
Page 96 of 226
Franklin County Assessor’s Office
John A Rosenau
County AssessorPage 97 of 226
ASSESSORS OFFICE FUNCTIONS
Physically Inspect all property, land and buildings, at least every six years (approx.
6,000 parcels each year).
Value all property, land and buildings, at 100% of market value every year, As of Jan
1st ( approx. 36,000 Parcels and New Construction as of July 31st (approx. 4,000
parcels).
Administer Valuation of Current Use and Ag Programs (3,800 + parcels annually)
Approve applications & continuances upon ownership transfer.
Calculate back tax calculation upon removal from the program
Perform audits of the program for compliance
For 2023 tax, shifted over 1.5 billion in value
Measure, sketch, verify characteristics and value New Construction every year.
Serve as the Guardian to prevent Taxing Districts from exceeding there Statutory
limits in Taxing.Page 98 of 226
Ownership and Address Maintenance of ALL Properties
for Property Tax Billing
Average over 280 ownership transfers per month
Administer Senior Citizen / Disabled Persons Tax
Exemption Program
2024 Estimates of Over 1200 annual applications
Examine all financial docs including IRS returns yearly
Approve, maintain and audit all participants yearly
Shifts approximately 1.5 million in tax’s
Personal Property –Farm and Commercial Businesses
2700 + accounts –must file annually
Some having over a thousand items per account
Maintenance and auditing of All accounts annuallyPage 99 of 226
Levy Calculations
22 separate taxing agencies
37 different geographical tax district areas
2 TIF Area’s
Building Permits
Imported monthly from all municipalities and county.
Average over 235 per month which are scheduled for New
Construction Valuation
State Utility Valuations
Import and calculate percentages
Balance and maintain all valuationsPage 100 of 226
Non –Profit Exemptions
Report ownership changes to Dept. of Revenue
Report use changes to Dept. of Revenue
GIS –Geographic Information System
Maintains official county parcel maps
Process all land segregations and subdivisions –Over 530 new parcels on
average annually-most add new rooftops, changes valuations and adds to
New Construction.
Assists other county offices-elections, planning, cities, etc.
Assists outside agencies-surveyors, title companies, attorneys
Process annexations to affect tax districtsPage 101 of 226
County has Overall Assessed Value Growth Currently
Doubling Every 5 years with past Growth Doubling
every 10 years for the past 40 years
$0
$2,000,000,000
$4,000,000,000
$6,000,000,000
$8,000,000,000
$10,000,000,000
$12,000,000,000
$14,000,000,000
$16,000,000,000
Assessment/Tax Year
ASSESSED VALUE
2023/2024
PreliminaryPage 102 of 226
0.000
2.000
4.000
6.000
8.000
10.000
12.000
14.000
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
Levy RateBillionsAssessment/Tax Year
ASSESSED VALUE VS. LEVY RATE
ASSESSED VALUE MEAN LEVY RATE MEDIAN LEVY RATE DISTRICT 101 LEVY RATE
McCleary
Decision of 2012 EHB 2242
2018
2023/2024
Preliminary
Page 103 of 226
$0
$100,000,000
$200,000,000
$300,000,000
$400,000,000
$500,000,000
$600,000,000
Assessment/Tax Year
NEW CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL NEW CONSTRUCTION RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION COMMERCIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION
2023/2024 Page 104 of 226
City of Pasco
TAX YEAR ASSESSED
VALUE
NEW
CONSTRUCTION
VALUE
HIGHEST
LAWFUL LEVY
ACTUAL
AMOUNT
LEVIED
BANKED
CAPACITY
ACTUAL LEVY
RATE
DISTRICT 101
LEVY RATE
2009 $2,863,125,470 $101,509,600 $7,119,502 $5,738,336 $1,381,166 2.004221 13.52406000
2010 $2,934,792,310 $58,565,500 $7,317,853 $5,865,306 $1,452,547 1.998542 12.85575600
2011 $3,100,250,228 $120,577,400 $7,638,101 $6,112,375 $1,525,726 1.971575 12.86860100
2012 $3,214,780,310 $99,251,700 $7,929,958 $6,327,851 $1,602,107 1.968362 13.05386500
2013 $3,300,169,365 $83,654,800 $8,173,921 $6,492,514 $1,681,407 1.96732752 13.31008400
2014 $3,543,038,495 $82,229,133 $8,709,520 $6,931,249 $1,778,271 1.95630087 13.11662445
2015 $3,679,413,343 $80,525,097 $8,954,146 $7,158,785 $1,795,361 1.94563218 12.97399675
2016 $3,937,446,202 $79,307,800 $9,445,401 $7,625,726 $1,819,675 1.93671897 12.79940596
2017 $4,227,977,752 $125,706,700 $9,790,853 $7,949,354 $1,841,499 1.88017877 12.21625746
2018 $4,800,361,242 $186,776,500 $10,240,885 $8,380,928 $1,859,957 1.74570628 12.26825343
2019 $5,500,291,262 $185,826,100 $10,688,684 $10,667,334 $21,350 1.9394126 9.99028762
2020 $6,121,229,885 $200,400,800 $11,203,399 $11,064,358 $139,041 1.80753838 10.05128757
2021 $6,798,396,835 $212,714,300 $11,700,955 $11,064,334 $636,621 1.68420288 9.91518635
2022 $8,065,205,983 $218,616,100 $12,186,158 $11,900,102 $286,056 1.46531575 8.79517663
2023 $9,752,006,225 $499,047,923 $13,152,839 $12,556,081 $596,758 1.287538247 8.29298624
2024 $12,330,565,249 $539,637,400Page 105 of 226
STATE SCHOOL PT 1
19.39%
STATE SCHOOL PT 2
10.32%
CURRENT EXPENSE
10.17%
COUNTY ROAD DISTRICT
2.96%
PORT OF PASCO
2.30%
CEMETERIES
0.03%
FIRE DISTRICTS2.42%
SCHOOLSENRICHMENTLEVYS20.38%
SCHOOLS BONDS17.93%Does Not IncludeNew Pasco School BondFor 2024 PASCO GENERAL
10.79%
KAHLOTUS GENERAL0.01%
CONNELL GENERAL
0.49%
MESA GENERAL
0.05%
MID COLUMBIA
LIBRARY…
HOSPITAL DISTRICT
#1…
MISCELLANEOUS ASSESSMENTS
1.55%
2023 FRANKLIN COUNTY
Page 106 of 226
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PROPERTY TAX IN WASHINGTON STATE
1853 –Territorial government established; all taxes to be assessed uniformly; exemption for
property of the United States, churches, and benevolent institutions.
1944 –17th Amendment to state constitution: added 40 mill limit. Property to be assessed at 50%
of true and fair value.
1970 –Open Space Taxation Act enacted, Current use vs highest & best use.
1971 –Annual increase in regular levies of taxing districts limited to 106% of the largest prior levy.
Annual update of values permitted.
1973 –Assessment level increased from 50% to 100% of true and fair value, for 1975 taxes.
2001 –I-747 passed in November which restricts taxing districts to a 1% monetary aggregate
increase over their prior highest lawful levy. Effective for the 2002 tax year.
2014 –All counties in the State of Washington required to revalue all real property on an annual
basis (SSB5368).Page 107 of 226
Questions?????Page 108 of 226
Pasco City Council Meeting
November 20, 2023Page 109 of 226
All City Revenues
Construction
Fund
16%
Utilities Fund
35%
General Fund
33%
Internal
Service Fund
4%
Other
0%
Special
Revenue Fund
12%
All Funds Revenue Budget Revenues for City activity is generated in
many fund types. This revenue supports
services provided City-wide.
The General Fund recognizes approximately a
third of all City revenues.
The General Fund provides administrative
support to other City funds and functions.Page 110 of 226
Service Areas of the General Fund
Department Name % of
Expense
Budget
Department Name % of
Expense
Budget
Police Department 24%Municipal Court 2%
Fire Department 12%Engineering & City Project Management 2%
Parks, Recreation, Facilities 9%Library 2%
Information Technology 6%Non-Departmental, City-wide Items 2%
Permitting, Planning and
Code Enforcement
5%Human Resources 1%
Finance and Utility Billing 3%Council <1%
City Manager & City Clerk
Offices
3%Remaining budget: Capital Support and
Operational Transfers to Special Revenue
Funds
28%Page 111 of 226
General Fund Operating Activity
2019-2020 Biennial Actual 2021-2022 Biennial Actual 2023-2024 Biennial Budget
Total Operating Revenue 114,805,858 139,856,236 144,214,702
Total Operating Expenses 104,832,429 124,383,957 147,197,555
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
MillionsRevenues in 2021-2022 were high related to
robust residential and commercial
construction, as well as strong motor vehicle
and recreational vehicle sales tax. Growth in
revenue for this biennium outpaced expense
increases by 3%.
The 2023-2024 budget includes increases in
labor cost related to new positions as part of
budget adoption, substantial increases in
supplies cost due to inflationary pressure and
anticipated debt service for Broadmoor Area.
For the 2023-2024 biennium, expense budget
escalation is greater than revenue growth by
15%.
Comparing the three periods, revenues are
increasing by an average 9% and expenses, an
average 13%.Page 112 of 226
General Fund Revenues
General Property
Tax, 14.4%
Other Tax,
1.3%
Retail Sales
Tax, 24.8%
Public Safety & Criminal
Justice Sales Tax, 4.9%Utility Tax,
13.5%
Licenses & Permits,
4.2%
Intergovernmental,
4.0%
Charges for Goods and
Services, 11.0%
Fine and Penalties,
1.0%
Miscellaneous, 1.0%
Interfund Loan , 0.1%
Transfers and Subsidy -
Revenue, 19.9%
•Taxes account for approximately 59% of
General Fund revenues.
Source Purpose % of Tax
Revenue
Retail Sales All General Fund
uses
24.8%
Retail Sales -
Voted
Public Safety &
Criminal Justice
4.9%
Property All General Fund
uses
14.4%
Utility All General Fund
uses
13.5%
Other All General Fund
uses
1.3%Page 113 of 226
Property Tax Revenue
$21,767,256
$23,353,266
$25,863,203
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
2019-2020 Actual 2021-2022 Actual 2023-2024 Adopted
•2023 revenue meeting
budgetary expectation.
•2023 composite rate $8.292
per $1000 assessed value.
•Cost to home valued at
$360,000
•City of Pasco, $463
•City of Richland, $782
•City of Kennewick, $558
•Revenue source is consistentPage 114 of 226
Where Does Property Tax Payment Go?
Jurisdiction of Use Rate % of Total Rate
Pasco School District $3.385 40.82%
State of Washington –Schools $2.531 30.52%
City of Pasco $1.288 15.53%
Franklin County $0.857 10.35%
Port of Pasco $0.195 2.35%
Mental Health & Veteran Relief $0.036 0.44%
Total $8.292 100.00%
Total Property Tax Bill for House Valued at $360,000 $2,985
City of Pasco Portion of Tax Bill for House Valued at
$360,000
$463Page 115 of 226
Retail Sales Tax
•Total tax rate 8.9%
•City of Pasco receives 0.85%
•Variable –especially, construction
•2023 activity is lower than
anticipated
•In progress, construction projects
anticipated to positively impact
second half of biennium.
•School district projects
•Darigold
•Local Bounti
•Tarragon
•Permitted housing starts
•Match one-time revenues with
one-time usage
$28,784,508
$40,116,017
$44,450,700
-
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
2019-2020 Actual 2021-2022 Actual 2023-2024 AdoptedPage 116 of 226
Retail Sales Tax –Public Safety & Criminal Justice
•2023 meeting budgetary
expectations.
•The City receives a portion of
this tax based on voter
approved legislation.
•Public Safety tax –0.3%
•40% of collection, per
capita
•Criminal Justice tax –0.1%
•90% of collection, per
capital
•Economy can impact
$6,415,823
$8,973,455 $8,780,000
-
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
2019-2020 Actual 2021-2022 Actual 2023-2024 AdoptedPage 117 of 226
Utility Tax
•2023 meeting budgetary
expectations.
•Rate assessed to both City and
external utility providers.
•Collection varies based on
individual utilities revenue.
Weather can impact.$23,041,598
$23,978,961
$24,204,918
22,000,000
23,000,000
24,000,000
25,000,000
2019-2020 Actual 2021-2022 Actual 2023-2024 AdoptedPage 118 of 226
Other Tax
•2023 meeting budgetary
expectations.
•Includes
•Gambling Tax
•Admission Tax
•Leasehold Tax
•Revenue can vary significantly
$1,940,959
$2,740,275
$2,392,852
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
2019-2020 Actual 2021-2022 Actual 2023-2024 AdoptedPage 119 of 226
Licenses & Permits
•Includes
•Animal License Fees
•Building Permits
•Business License Fees
•Animal licensing revenue is
lagging. Dollar value is low.
•Building Permit revenue
lagging by approximately 12%
as compared to biennium
expectation.
•Business licensing slightly
ahead of expectation.
$5,353,252
$6,578,166
$7,481,532
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
2019-2020 Actual 2021-2022 Actual 2023-2024 AdoptedPage 120 of 226
Intergovernmental
•Includes
•State Shared Revenues
•PUD Privilege
•Grants
•COVID grants elevated 2021-
2022
•Anticipated to meet budgetary
expectation
$7,906,227
$9,342,831
$7,194,296
-
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
2019-2020 Actual 2021-2022 Actual 2023-2024 AdoptedPage 121 of 226
Charges for Services
•Includes
•Interfund charges for City
General Fund provided
services
•Parks & Recreation activities
•School Resource Officer
•Airport Fire Protection
•Utility Billing Miscellaneous
•Development services
•Anticipated to meet budgetary
expectation, with exception of
plan check fees. Other receipts
have potential to offset any
shortage.
$14,800,951
$19,404,552 $19,688,841
-
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
2019-2020 Actual 2021-2022 Actual 2023-2024 AdoptedPage 122 of 226
Fines & Penalties
•Includes
•Public Safety infractions
and fines
•Court related fees
•Anticipated to meet budgetary
expectation
$2,044,964 $2,017,061
$1,790,529
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2019-2020 Actual 2021-2022 Actual 2023-2024 AdoptedPage 123 of 226
Miscellaneous
•Includes
•Interest Income
•Rents
•Reimbursements
•Donations
•Property Sales
•Planned sale of city properties
was markedly increased 2023-
2024 budget. There is high
probability that City will not be
able to meet the target set.
•Interest income is strong
considering increased, short term
interest rate.
$3,693,353
$3,360,742
$7,254,630
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
2019-2020 Actual 2021-2022 Actual 2023-2024 AdoptedPage 124 of 226
Property Tax in Washington State
•Property tax is also called Ad Valorem Tax.
•The amount of tax collection assessed by the City on a given year is the
levy. Per State law, property tax levy can increase by the lesser of 1% or the
value of inflation as expressed by the Implicit Price Deflator (IPD).
•The IPD as of September 25, 2023 is 3.67%.Page 125 of 226
Banked Capacity
PROS
•The value of the allowable increase can be “banked” if not assessed each year to be recaptured in a future year’s levy.•Property tax rate is lower, though minimally.
CONS•Banked property tax levy value does not maintain historical value. If the property tax rate decreases, banked levy value decreases also.•Banked property tax could be taken away from the City at any time due to multiple external factors. City has faced this in the past.Page 126 of 226
Assessed Value & Tax Rate
$2.42
$1.29
$1.78
$1.99 $2.31 $2.48 $2.86 $2.93 $3.10 $3.21 $3.30 $3.54 $3.68 $3.94 $4.23
$4.80
$5.50
$6.12
$6.69
$8.07
$9.75
$12.33
$-
$2.00
$4.00
$6.00
$8.00
$10.00
$12.00
$14.00
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Assessed Value (Billions)Tax RateYearTax Rate Assessed Value
Recapture
Banked Capacity
Page 127 of 226
Estimate of 2024 Levy
Description 2023 Actual No Increase 1% Increase 1% + Banked
Highest Lawful Levy $13,152,839
2023 Levy $12,556,081 $12,556,081 $12,556,081 $12,556,081
Value of 1% Increase 131,528 131,528
State Utility (est)20,000 20,000 20,000
New Construction (est)694,804 694,804 694,804
Recapture of Banked 596,758
New Levy Value 13,270,885 13,402,413 13,999,171
Rate 1.288 1.076 1.086 1.135
Tax Increment Financing-Other -173,216 -173,216 -173,216
Tax Increment Financing-City -21,878 -21,878 -21,878
City General Purpose Collection $12,556,081 $13,075,791 $13,207,319 $13,804,8077
Increase in Collection over 2023 $519,710 $651,238 $1,247,996Page 128 of 226
Estimate of 2024 Levy
Description 2023 Actual No Increase 1% Increase 1% + Banked
Rate per $1,000 AV $1.288 $1.076 $1.087 $1.135
Cost to property owner
($360,000 AV)
$464 $387 $391 $409
Increase in Collection over 2023 $519,710 $651,238 $1,247,996
Comparison with Neighboring Jurisdictions -2023
Name 2023 Rate Cost per home valued at $360,000 Tax Collection
City of Richland $2.173 $782 $21,639,481
City of Kennewick $1.549 $558 $14,897,051
City of Pasco $1.288 $464 $11,818,073Page 129 of 226
Banked Capacity
Year Highest
Lawful Levy
Levy
Rate
Available
Actual Levy
Amount
Actual
Levy Rate
New
Construction
Value
Uncollected
New
Construction
Uncollected
Levy
Existing
Annual
Inflation
(CPI)
2020 $11,203,399 $1.830 $11,064,358 $1.807 $200,400,800 $-778 $-139,041 1.23%
2021 $11,713,867 $1.721 $11,064,334 $1.684 $212,714,300 $-4,832 $-124,947 5.97%
2022 $12,186,158 $1.511 $11,900,102 $1.465 $218,616,100 $-20,472 $-104,097 8.15%
2023 $13,152,839 $1.348 $12,556,081 $1.287 $499,047,923 $-17,700 $-228,673 3.28%
Total $-43,782 $-596,758
As assessed value increases, the levy rate is lowered. In year’s when available levy (tax) value is banked, no levy collection is
made. As time passes, the difference between highest lawful levy and assessed levy is recalculated, causing the banked levy
value to increase. The banked capacity calculation is a product of actual levy rate, making value lower than available.Page 130 of 226
New 2023-2024 Expenses
•Debt service for fire station 85 was included in the adopted budget. However,
additional funding needs for Memorial Pool and Animal Shelter Annex Improvements
and Gesa Stadium Improvements were added with issuance of 2023 bond. The
resulting additional annual debt service is averages $434,000.
•During the creation of the 2023-2024 budget, City assumption of Pasco Specialty
Kitchen and Pasco Farmers’ Market was not anticipated. Mid-biennium budget
increased to support these functions.
•Need to right size Animal Control Facility operational budget reflective of full-service
delivery model of 2023. Increase in budget authority requested as part of mid-
biennium review.Page 131 of 226
Future Considerations
•Higher than typical inflationary impact for items like fuel, utilities, and supplies can
be absorbed for part of the biennium. Continued pressure may necessitate
budgetary increases in the coming year and beyond.
•Debt service has not been issued for transportation projects in Broadmoor Tax
Increment Financing Area. Revenue recognized from tax increment builds with
addition to Franklin County Assessor tax processing. By nature of annual assessment,
debt service expenses will outpace associated revenues while development occurs.
•Successful SAFER grant application allowed the hire of 15 firefighters at the end of
2022/beginning of 2023. SAFER grant funding will support labor costs for three
years. Page 132 of 226
•Necessary to set levy by Ordinance and delivery to Franklin County by November 30, 2023.
•Topic will be an agenda item of November 27, 2023 Council Meeting.
•Questions?
Next Steps
Page 133 of 226
Definitions
Prior Year’s Levy Each year’s tax revenue calculation starts at the prior year’s value levied. This value is the
numerator of the rate calculation.
Limited Increase Per State law, a municipality can increase its request for tax levy by the lesser of the Implicit
Price Deflator or 1%. Unassessed value can be “banked” for future levy.
New Construction or
Annexed Property
An estimation of each year’s new construction that is substantially complete by July is added to
the levy calculation.
State Utility Value Represents the City’s share of intercounty utility company property taxes.
Banked Capacity Banked capacity can be recaptured and applied to the new levy calculation. This recapture will
be calculated at the prior year’s levy rate. Not the rate in place when banked.
Assessed Value The levy (tax) amount is spread across all properties in the jurisdiction based on total assessed
value. Each individual taxpayer is billed based on their percentage of total assessed value.
Tax Levy Rate The tax levy rate is the calculated by dividing the new levy amount by the current year’s
assessed value total. Page 134 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council November 9, 2023
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Steve Worley, Public Works Director
Public Works
SUBJECT:Resolution Nos. 4401, 4402, and 4403 - Change Orders Nos. 22-27 for
the Lewis Street Overpass and PSA Amendments with J-U-B Engineers,
Inc. and WSP USA, Inc. respectively for Construction Support and
Construction Management
I.REFERENCE(S):
Resolution - Cascade Bridge, LLC Change Orders Nos. 22 to 27
Resolution Inc. for J-U-B with PSA Engineers, 5 No. Supplement - to
construction support
Resolution - Amendment No. 2 to PSA with WSP USA, Inc. for Construction
Management
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION:City the authorizing 4401, No. to approve move I Resolution
Manager to execute Change Order No. 22-27 to the Construction Contract with
Cascade Bridge, LLC for the Lewis Street Overpass Project.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4402, authorizing the the City
Manager to execute Supplement No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement
with J-U-B Engineers, Inc. for the Lewis Street Overpass Project.
MOTION:I move to approve Resolution No. 4403, authorizing the City
Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 for the Professional Services
Agreement with WSP USA, Inc. for the Lewis Street Overpass project.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
Additional Allocation for Construction Contract: $1,774,244.93
Additional Allocation for Consultant Services: $1,137,843.00
TOTAL $2,912,087.93
This project is currently funded through State and local funds. The approved
Page 135 of 226
project budget is insufficient to cover the proposed increase in cost. Additional
external funding is being pursued to help cover the shortfall identified. An
allocation from local funds is proposed to temporarily cover the totality of the
shortfall. This allocation will be included as part of the Mid-Biennium Budget
Amendment.
Details on allocations necessary for the project are as follow:
Construction contract with with Cascade Bridge, LLC
Original Contract Total $22,344,999.88
Previously Approved Change Orders $ 1,935,796.09
Proposed Change Orders (22-27) $ 1,774,244.93
Proposed New Contract Total $26,055,040.90
Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with J-U-B Engineers, Inc.
Previously approved PSA and Supplements Nos. 1-4: $2,313,920.00
Proposed Supplement No. 5: $ 223,410.00
Proposed New PSA Total $2,336,330.00
Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with WSP USA, Inc.
Previously approved PSA and Amendment No.1: $1,902,077.50
Proposed Amendment No. 2: $ 914,433.00
Proposed New PSA Total $2,816,510.50
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Street Lewis the replaces existing Overpass Street Lewis The project
undercrossing, constructed under the BNSF Railyard in 1937, with a new
bridge over the railyard.
On March 1, 2021, Council awarded the Lewis Street Overpass construction
contract in of amount the Vancouver, WA LLC Bridge, Cascade to of
$22,344,999.88.
Since construction began, the project has required 21 Change Orders for a
total of $1,935,796.09.
Six (6) additional change orders (CO) are presented for Council approval as
follow:
Change Order No. 22 – BNSF Security Fence ($20,000.00): This
the reimburse to item pay order force a creates change account
contractor for the costs of renting, placing, and maintaining security
fencing per BNSF direction.
Page 136 of 226
Change Order No. 23 – BNSF Bridge No. Signs ($1,855.51): The costs
included in CO 23 are to fabricate and install two BSNF required signs
on the Lewis Street Overpass Bridge. The signs include the required
DOT crossing number and will be mounted on the outside of the
pedestrian barrier directly over one of the BNSF tracks.
Change Order No. 24 – Modified BNSF Water Service ($142,321.41):
The costs included in CO 24 are to install a modified water service for
BNSF. Due to the large water service, the new 8” water service meter
will require a heated enclosure. This enclosure requires new electrical
work including service panels, junction boxes, and other associated
electrical improvements.
Change Order No. 25 - SEW Redesign Delay ($997,699.01): The
change order accounts for the additional working days associated with
the SEW walls redesign. This change order is proposed to be executed
unilaterally, with the amount of days that that could be justified based on
a Construction the by performed analysis schedule complex
management consultant. The proposed Change order amount is below
the contractor's request.
Change Order No. 26 - Modified SEW Walls 3, 4, 7, 8 ($566,769.00):
This change order accounts for the labor and material associated with
the modifications of the original SEW wall in the project. This change
order is proposed to be executed unilaterally, utilizing bid pricing for the
overrun in backfill materials. The proposed Change order amount is
below the contractor's request.
Change Order No. 27 – Traffic Control items for added Phase 1A and
temporary barrier ($45,600): The costs included in CO 22 are the added
traffic control for Phase 1A, which includes; cones, barrels, barricades,
temporary dotted white line, temporary Class A signs, added survey,
added engineering, and added project management. The labor needed
to install and maintain traffic control will be tracked and paid under
existing bid item A-133 Other Traffic Control Labor. Labor to install the
temporary Class A signs are included. Bid item A-132 Flaggers will be
used as required and paid under the existing bid item. In addition, the
temporary barrier included shall be paid under the existing bid item A-
111.
Relatedly, Supplement No. 5 to the PSA with J-U-B Engineers, Inc. is proposed
in the amount of $223,410.00 for construction support and Engineer of Record
services extending beyond the original timeline.
Similarly, Amendment No. 2 to the PSA with WSP USA, Inc. is proposed in the
amount of $914,433.00 for Construction Management for the project. This
amendment will provide supplemental construction management services for
the duration of the Lewis Street Overpass Project.
V.DISCUSSION:
Page 137 of 226
These items were discussed in the November 13, 2023 Council Workshop.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed change orders and amendments
to the PSAs.
Page 138 of 226
Resolution – CO 22-27 for Lewis St Overpass - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER
NOS. 22-27 TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH CASCADE
BRIDGE, LLC. FOR THE LEWIS STREET OVERPASS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington and Cascade Bridge, LLC. entered into a Construction
contract on March 1, 2021, for construction of the Lewis Street Overpass Project; and
WHEREAS, this project involves the construction of a new 562-foot, 4-span, pre-stressed
Concrete overpass, over the BNSF Railway yard and a new 63-foot, voided slab, overpass over
First Avenue. Along with roadway improvements, backfilling, partial structure removal, retaining
wall construction, earthwork, paving with HMA, landscaping, storm drainage, illumination, water
mains, sanitary sewer, and other associated work; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington and Cascade Bridge, LLC. executed Change
Orders Nos. 1 through 21 to provide for additional work not included in the original contract; and
WHEREAS, proposed Change Orders Nos. 22 through 27 involve additional work related
to: BNSF Security Fence, BNSF Bridge No. Signs, Modified BNSF Water Service, SEW Wall
Design Revisions, and Traffic Control items and temporary barrier for a total of $1,774,244.93;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into Change
Order Nos. 22-27 with Cascade Bridge, LLC.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the Change
Order Nos. 22-27 between the City of Pasco and Cascade Bridge, LLC. as attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Be it Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Change Order Nos. 22-27 on behalf of the
City of Pasco.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution will take effect immediately.
Page 139 of 226
Resolution – CO 22-27 for Lewis St Overpass - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of
November, 2023.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 140 of 226
Page 141 of 226
Page 142 of 226
Kennewick, Washington 993362810 W. Clearwater AvenueFax: 509.736.0790Phone: 509.783.2144Suite 201J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC.www.jub.comJ-U-B ENGINEERS, INC.Engineers Surveyors Planners
SIGN INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONSDESCRIPTIONJ-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF WHOLE OR PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE EXPRESS AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.PROPERTY OF HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, IS THE THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED REUSE OF DRAWINGS NO.REVISIONLEWIS ST. OVERPASSCITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTONBYAPR.DATEBYAPR.DATEBYAPR.DATEDESIGN BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
SHEET NUMBER:
JUB PROJ. # :
INCH, SCALE ACCORDINGLY
AT FULL SIZE, IF NOT ONE
ONE INCH
FILE :
LAST UPDATED:
30-18-020_PS_SS.dgn
7/20/2023
STPUS-HLP-3530(006)FED AID #:
30-18-020
DMS
DMS
TAM
SS-2
LEW IS ST. OVERPASS
D.O.T. NO. 977800L
2.532.531213.5 10.6 3 4.8 3 19.6 3.5
4.617.635.839.34.7
48
LEWIS ST OVERPASS DOT SIGN BRACKET DETAIL
2.0" Radius, 0.5" Border, 1.0" Indent, Black on White;
"LEWIS ST. OVERPASS" White, D 2K;
"D.O.T. NO. 977800L" White, D 2K;
6
1.51.56
5.5
66.5
5.5
6.5``BRACKETSIGN`
`
BRACKET `
`
BRACKET
2.5"5.0"5.0"`
`
BRACKET
BARRIER COLUMN
3"3"
5/8"Ø HOLE, TYP.
PL 10"x6"x1/4"
GALVANIZED `BRACKETTYP1.5"TYP
BARRIER COLUMN BARRIER COLUMN
SEE BRACKET DETAIL (TYP.)4"9"2'-0"9"1•" TYPSIGN PLACEMENT DETAIL
3"18"3"
BARRIER
FACE OF PEDESTRIAN
ATTACH TO OUTSIDE
TO ACCOMMODATE MOUNTING HARDWARE.
ENSURE ADEQUATE LENGTH OF THREADED ROD PROTRUDES
MOUNT SIGN WITH GALV. LOCK WASHER AND HEX NUT.
EDGE OF BRIDGE IS 22+12.
APPROXIMATE STATION OF MAIN TRACK 3 AT THE SOUTH
EDGE OF BRIDGE IS 22+20.
APPROXIMATE STATION OF MAIN TRACK 3 AT THE NORTH
TRACK 3.
OUTSIDE OF THE PEDESTRIAN BARRIER DIRECTLY OVER MAIN
INSTALL THE LEWIS ST OVERPASS DOT SIGN ON THE
4.
3.
2.
1.
NOTES:
3.5" EMBEDMENT. SEE NOTE 4, TYP.
GALV. GR. A36 THREADED ROD W/
CAST IN PLACE 1/2"Ø x 5" LONG
P
R
OFES
SIONAL ENGINEER26230
HDRH
RCIA .RO
OD
Page 143 of 226
Page 144 of 226
Page 145 of 226
Page 146 of 226
Page 147 of 226
Page 148 of 226
Page 149 of 226
Page 150 of 226
Page 151 of 226
Page 152 of 226
Page 153 of 226
Page 154 of 226
Page 155 of 226
Page 156 of 226
Page 157 of 226
Page 158 of 226
Page 159 of 226
Standard
X Unilateral
Project No:Project No: 13007 Project Title:Lewis Street Overpass
FED-AID #: STPUS-HLP-3530(006)
WSDOT: TA4087
Contractor:
Reason for Change:SEW Redesign Delay
Detail as Appropriate:
Contract Bid Amount:$22,344,999.88
SALES TAX @ 8.6%:
Total: 22,344,999.88$
Subtotal $2,071,045.17 Subtotal 997,699.01$
Sales tax (rate varies) $28,927.84 Sales tax @ 8.9%
Total $2,099,973.01 Total 997,699.01$
Total Change Orders To Date 3,097,672.02$
New Contract Amount
YES
CONTRACTOR Date Date
CONST. MANAGER Date CIP MANAGER Date Date
CITY OF PASCO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 25
Cascade Bridge LLC
APPROVED:
25,442,671.90$
IS CONTRACT TIME AFFECTED BY THIS CHANGE ORDER
Contract Time Prior to this Change Order…………………………… 460
Revised Total Contract Time…………………………………………….
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:
APPROVED:
This change order adds one new item, A-188 Extended Overhead for SEW Redesign Delay. This
item shall be full compensation for all direct and indirect overhead costs resulting from the project
time extension caused by the redesign of SEW Walls 3, 4, 7, and 8. Per schedule analysis
performed by the City's Construction Managment Represenative, WSP, the Contractor is due 119
additional working days related to SEW wall modifications. 67 of the 119 additional working days
are compensable at the Contractor's established overhead rate.
PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDER CURRENT CHANGE ORDER
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
PROJECT MANAGER
Modification to Contract time by this Change Order……………….. 119
579
It is mutually agreed by both parties that this Change Order fully describes the change(s) that is (are) being made and that the
compensation for this Change Order is full and complete and is the only compensation due or owing for this Change Order.
Further, it is mutually agreed that this document will supplement the present Contract Documents and that the provisions of the
previously executed Contract Documents shall apply to this Change Order.
APPROVED:
Page 160 of 226
Bid Item:
A-188 1 LS 997,699.01$
Sales Tax 8.9%
997,699.01$ Total this Change Order …………………………….………….
Subtotal, Additions ………………………………………..
Add the Following Bid Items:
Extended Overhead for SEW
Redesign Delay
Page 161 of 226
Standard
X Unilateral
Project No:Project No: 13007 Project Title:Lewis Street Overpass
FED-AID #: STPUS-HLP-3530(006)
WSDOT: TA4087
Contractor:
Reason for Change:Modified SEW Walls 3, 4, 7, 8
Detail as Appropriate:
Contract Bid Amount:$22,344,999.88
SALES TAX @ 8.6%:
Total: 22,344,999.88$
Subtotal $3,068,744.18 Subtotal 566,769.00$
Sales tax (rate varies) $28,927.84 Sales tax @ 8.9%
Total $3,097,672.02 Total 566,769.00$
Total Change Orders To Date 3,664,441.02$
New Contract Amount
NO
CONTRACTOR Date Date
CONST. MANAGER Date CIP MANAGER Date Date
PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDER CURRENT CHANGE ORDER
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
PROJECT MANAGER
Modification to Contract time by this Change Order……………….. 0
579
It is mutually agreed by both parties that this Change Order fully describes the change(s) that is (are) being made and that the
compensation for this Change Order is full and complete and is the only compensation due or owing for this Change Order. Further,
it is mutually agreed that this document will supplement the present Contract Documents and that the provisions of the previously
executed Contract Documents shall apply to this Change Order.
APPROVED:
CITY OF PASCO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 26
Cascade Bridge LLC
APPROVED:
26,009,440.90$
IS CONTRACT TIME AFFECTED BY THIS CHANGE ORDER
Contract Time Prior to this Change Order…………………………… 579
Revised Total Contract Time…………………………………………….
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:
APPROVED:
This change order increases the quantity of existing item A-167 by 5,058 CY at the existing bid unit
price. This change order will also delete Item A-038 and replace it with a new item, A-189 Revised
Structural Earth Wall, for modifications required to SEW Walls 3, 4, 7, 8 . These items shall be full
compensation for all the additional labor, materials, tools, and equipment necessary to provide and
install the revised SEW Walls 3, 4, 7, and 8, due to the August 2022 redesign.
Page 162 of 226
Bid Item:
A-167 Gravel Borrow for SEW Incl Haul 5,058.00 CY 151,740.00$
A-038 (55,065.00) SF (2,202,600.00)
A-189 53,421.00 SF 2,617,629.00$
Sales Tax 8.9%
566,769.00$ Total this Change Order …………………………….………….
Subtotal, Additions ………………………………………..
Add the Following Bid Items:
Revised Structural Earth Wall
Structural Earth Wall
Page 163 of 226
X Standard
Unilateral
Project No:Project No: 13007 Project Title:Lewis Street Overpass
FED-AID #: STPUS-HLP-3530(006)
WSDOT: TA4087
Contractor:
Reason for Change:Phase 1A Traffic Control
Detail as Appropriate:
Contract Bid Amount:$22,344,999.88
SALES TAX @ 8.6%:
Total: 22,344,999.88$
Subtotal $3,635,513.18 Subtotal 45,600.00$
Sales tax (rate varies) $28,927.84 Sales tax @ 8.9% -$
Total $3,664,441.02 Total 45,600.00$
Total Change Orders To Date 3,710,041.02$
New Contract Amount
NO
PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDER CURRENT CHANGE ORDER
Modification to Contract time by this Change Order……………….. 0
579
It is mutually agreed by both parties that this Change Order fully describes the change(s) that is (are) being made and that the
compensation for this Change Order is full and complete and is the only compensation due or owing for this Change Order. Further,
it is mutually agreed that this document will supplement the present Contract Documents and that the provisions of the previously
executed Contract Documents shall apply to this Change Order.
CITY OF PASCO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 27
Cascade Bridge LLC
26,055,040.90$
IS CONTRACT TIME AFFECTED BY THIS CHANGE ORDER
Contract Time Prior to this Change Order…………………………… 579
Revised Total Contract Time…………………………………………….
This change order adds traffic control plans TC-7 and TC-7A for Phase 1A traffic control on the east
and west end of the project.
Quantities are increased for bid item A-111 Temporary Barrier by 350 LF. Bid Item A-136 Temporary
Pavement Markings - Short Duration and A-133 Other Traffic Control Labor (labor for installing and
maintaining the traffic control devices fro Phase 1A) will be tracked and paid under the existing bid
items.
One new item, Phase 1A Traffic Control, is added. This item is full compensation for all management,
surveying, materials (cones, barrels, barricades, temporary signing, etc.), tools, and equipment
necessary to implement the Phase 1A Traffic Control.
Public outreach and traffic signal modifications shall be performed by the City of Pasco.
Schedule impacts for this change order have not been quantified yet and will be addressed on a later
change order if determined valid. Schedule impacts may include additional contract time and/or
additional costs associated with this time.
Page 164 of 226
CONTRACTOR Date Date
CONST. MANAGER Date CIP MANAGER Date Date
Bid Item:
A-111 Temporary Barrier 350.00 LF 9,100.00$
A-186 1.00 LS 36,500.00
Sales Tax 8.9%
45,600.00$
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
PROJECT MANAGER
APPROVED:
Total this Change Order …………………………….………….
Subtotal, Additions ………………………………………..
Add the Following Bid Items:
Phase 1A Traffic Control
APPROVED:
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:
APPROVED:
Page 165 of 226
Resolution - Amendment No. 2 to WSP USA, Inc. PSA for LSO - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO. 2 FOR THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH WSP USA, INC. FOR THE LEWIS STREET OVERPASS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington and WSP USA, Inc. entered into a
Professional Services Agreement on July 24, 2020, to provide construction management services
with respect to the Lewis Street Overpass Project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington and WSP USA, Inc. entered into Amendment
No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement on November 12, 2021, in the amount of $49,422.86
to provide girder fabrication inspection services with respect to the Lewis Street Overpass Project;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington and WSP USA, Inc. desires to enter into Amendment
No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $914,433.00 to provide ongoing
construction management and inspection services support during the extended construction period;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into Amendment
No. 2 with WSP USA, Inc.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the
Amendment No. 2 between the City of Pasco and WSP USA, Inc. as attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A and Exhibit B.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Amendment No. 2 on behalf of the City of
Pasco; and to make minor substantive changes as necessary to execute the Amendment.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution will take effect immediately.
Page 166 of 226
Resolution - Amendment No. 2 to WSP USA, Inc. PSA for LSO - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of
____________, 2023.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 167 of 226
Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement Page 1
WSP USA Inc.
Lewis Street Overpass Construction Management
AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 to
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Lewis Street Overpass Construction Management
Project No. 13007
AGREEMENT NO. 20-018
WHEREAS, the City and WSP USA Inc., entered into a Professional Services
Agreement on 7/24/2020 to provide engineering services with respect to the Lewis Street
Overpass project.
NOW, THEREFORE, this agreement is amended to allow WSP USA Inc., to provide
additional construction management services as described on Exhibit A.
1. Scope of Work:
See Exhibit A.
2. Fee:
No Change. The compensation for the additional work is based on a Time and
Materials of $914,433.00, increasing the total authorized amount to $2,816,510.50.
3. Time of performance:
Time has been extended. The services shall be complete for the project on or before
12/31/2024.
DATED THIS _______ DAY OF __________, 2023.
CITY OF PASCO: CONSULTANT
City of Pasco WSP USA Inc.
Steve M. Worley – Public Works Director Jill Marilley – Construction Services Manager
Page 168 of 226
EXHIBIT A
City of Pasco
Scope of Work
Amendment #2
Lewis Street Overcrossing Construction Management
Amendment #2 is required to add money and time to the contract because of the delays to the project
due to unknown underground obstructions and design issues with the SEW walls.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This section is unchanged.
PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS
The original project assumptions are amended with the change that due to project delays and a winter
shutdown from 11/23 to 4/24 (approx.) duration will not exceed 50 months including final records.
DEFINITIONS & ABBREVIATIONS
This section is unchanged.
Task 1 Project Management
The original scope is supplemented with the following:
Assumptions
The original assumptions are amended with the change that services will be complete by December
31, 2024.
Deliverables
This section is unchanged.
Task 2 Resident Engineer
The original scope is supplemented with the following:
• Perform inspector duties as necessary.
Assumptions
The original assumptions are amended to the following:
• Maximum of 3 contract disputes requiring Contract Claim Report.
• Maximum of 10 emergency incidents requiring force account response.
• Maximum of 4 schedule updates.
• Maximum of 200 Requests for Information (RFIs).
• Maximum of 35 total change orders.
Deliverables
The deliverables are unchanged.
Task 3 Office Engineering
This section is unchanged.
Assumptions
This section is unchanged.
Deliverables
The deliverables are unchanged.
Page 169 of 226
Task 4 Quality Verification Inspections
The original scope is supplemented with the following:
• Perform twice weekly inspections of worksite during the 2023-24 winter shutdown.
Assumptions
This section is unchanged.
Deliverables
The deliverables are unchanged.
Page 170 of 226
Total Project Costs for Amendment #2 - Exhibit B
Total Labor – Regular & OT $859,226.00
Total Direct Costs $ 55,207.00
___________
Total Amendment #2 Costs $914,433.00
Page 171 of 226
Client Name:City of Pasco
Project Name:Pasco - Lewis St Overpass CM
Firm Name/Role Category Total Hours Rate Total Labor
01.1010.FLD - PM-
Field
01.1020.GSO -
PA.CA-GSO
02.9010.FLD - RE-
Field
03.9010.FLD - OE-
Field
04.9010.FLD - QV
Inspector
04.9010.LI.FLD -
Lead Inspector
05.9010.FLD -
Fabricatiion
Inspect
06.9010.FLD -
Scheduler
WSP Jill Marilley - PIC 0 - -$ -$ - - - - - - - -
WSP Janie Arens - PA 0 62 145.83$ 9,041.36$ - 62 - - - - - -
WSP Lester Rubstello - PM 0 1,085 225.96$ 245,141.40$ 1,085 - - - - - - -
WSP Megan McIntyre 0 - -$ -$ - - - - - - - -
WSP Lester Rubstello - RE 0 1,775 229.63$ 407,593.35$ - - 1,775 - - - - -
WSP Andrew Hentges - Inspector 0 1,590 105.12$ 167,141.71$ - - - 1,590 - - - -
WSP Vijay Sanampudi - Schedule 0 35 202.41$ 7,084.50$ - - - - 35 - - -
WSP Andrew Hentges - Inspector- OT 0 135 99.82$ 13,475.18$ - - - 135 - - - -
WSP Subtotal 4,681.9 849,477.50$ 1,085 62 1,775 1,725 35 - - -
4,682 1,085 62 1,775 1,725 35 - - -
849,477.50$ 245,141.40$ 9,041.36$ 407,593.35$ 180,616.88$ 7,084.50$ -$ -$ -$
SUBS - BY TOTAL AMOUNT
Total
Perteet 20,000.00$
WA (10,251.26)$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Total Subs 9,748.74$
Total
Other 400.00$
Per Diem 22,628.00$
Mileage 19,099.80$
0 -$
Hotel 11,040.00$
Overtime Premium 959.40$
Software 1,080.00$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
55,207.20$
914,433$
check
Total Labor Hours
Total Labor Revenue
TOTAL PRICE
Total Other Direct Costs
EXPENSES - SUMMARY - WSP ONLY
Other Direct Costs
Subs
LABOR - WSP by Task
Page 172 of 226
Resolution - Sup No. 5 J-U-B PSA for LSO Project - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND EXECUTE
SUPPLEMENT NO. 5 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. FOR LEWIS STREET OVERPASS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington and J-U-B Engineers, Inc. (the project’s
Engineer of Record) entered into a Professional Services Agreement No. 30-18-020 on February
5, 2018, in the amount of $1,364,800 to provide design services with respect to the Lewis Street
Overpass Project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington and J-U-B Engineers, Inc. entered into
Supplement Nos. 1 and 2 to the Professional Services Contract in the amount of $258,200 to add
right-of-way tasks, a right-of-way sub consultant (Universal Field Services), along with various
design revisions; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington and J-U-B Engineers, Inc. entered into Supplement
Nos. 3 and 4 to the Professional Services Contract in the amount of $489,920 to add construction
support services and ongoing on-call engineering support during construction; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington and J-U-B Engineers, Inc. desire to enter into
Supplement No. 5 to the Professional Services Contract in the amount of $223,410.00 to provide
additional ongoing on-call engineering support during construction; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into Supplement
No. 5 with J-U-B Engineers, Inc.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the
Supplement No. 5 between the City of Pasco and J-U-B Engineers, Inc. as attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Be It Further Resolved, the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Supplement No. 5 on behalf of the City of
Pasco; and to make minor substantive changes as necessary to execute the Supplement.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution will take effect immediately.
Page 173 of 226
Resolution - Sup No. 5 J-U-B PSA for LSO Project - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ____ day of
__________________, 2023.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 174 of 226
EXHIBIT A
Page 175 of 226
EXHIBIT A
Page 176 of 226
EXHIBIT A
Page 177 of 226
EXHIBIT A
Page 178 of 226
EXHIBIT A
Page 179 of 226
EXHIBIT A
Page 180 of 226
EXHIBIT APage 181 of 226
EXHIBIT A
Page 182 of 226
AGENDA REPORT
FOR:City Council November 15, 2023
TO:Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 11/20/23
FROM:Jacob Gonzalez, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT:Ordinance No. 4694 - Amending PMC Title 21 Related to Street
Connectivity
I.REFERENCE(S):
Ordinance
Presentation
II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: Sections amending 4694, Ordinance No. to move I approve
21.05.020 “Purpose;” 21.05.030 “Application of this Title;” 21.05.040
21.10.020 “Exceptions;” 21.05.060 “Approval Required;” “Terms Defined;”
Chapter 21.15 “Streets;” and Section 21.20.010 “Block Length” and within Title
21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” of the Pasco Municipal Code
and, further, authorize publication by title only.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
In December 2019, City staff initiated the process of developing an update to
the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) that would effectively implement established
Council Goals and the adopted Comprehensive Plan related to improvement of
the transportation system. The need to improve and assure connectivity within
the City's transportation system, specifically the development of an integrated
transportation network, has been reflected in City Council Goals dating back to
2010. The importance of such connectivity was identified as early as the West
Pasco Traffic Analysis Study from 1992 and the Interstate I-182 Sub-Area
Report from 2003.
Since 2010, Pasco has seen substantial growth, gaining over 22,000 residents
Page 183 of 226
and reaching a population exceeding 81,000 in 2023. Projections anticipate an
additional 62,000 residents by 2045. The continued growth and congestion
issues that come from it, highlight the need to enhance transportation planning
practices to effectively accommodate the city's expansion and address the
increasing transportation related challenges.
Despite numerous planning efforts, studies, and analyses conducted over the
past decades to tackle transportation planning, there have been no updates to
the regulations or planning guidelines that determine the transportation system
network that is built. To align with long-established City Council Goals and
Comprehensive Planning, and in response to community input, staff is
proposing a code amendment to address the transportation system network.
Staff has prepared a revised recommendation for City Council consideration.
The the from directly recommendations references amendment revised
adopted Transportation System Master Plan, adopted on August 1, 2022, via
Resolution No 4220. The revised amendment is intended to provide more
clarity, reduce redundancy, and remove inconsistencies between within the
PMC and Standards Construction and Design the with and itself Pasco
Specifications. The proposed street connectivity amendment was subject to
eight public hearings, including a full recommendation by the Pasco Planning
Commission on October 15, 2021.
In total, staff has met with stakeholder representatives on nine separate
occasions to discuss the proposal. Most recently, in September and November
2023. The updated proposal (detailed in the Discussion) also represents a
significant shift from previous proposals that address the concerns expressed
by key stakeholders, including reducing regulatory burden, associated costs,
loss of developable land, and clarity. This has been reaffirmed after receiving
comments from the Tri-City Association of Realtors that the updated proposal
appreciates the current proposal revisions.
While there have been concerns linking a decrease in developable lots to the
new code amendment, it's important to highlight that the application of our
current municipal code requirements, though relatively minimal, has allowed
developers to increase the number of lots available for development.
V.DISCUSSION:
City staff have continued to evaluate information, data, and best practices on
how to develop a cohesive multi-modal transportation system, as called for by
City Council in the 2022-2023 Goals. The results from the 2021 National
Citizen Survey indicated a decrease in positive rating of traffic flow on public
streets (2019: 41%, 2021: 29%) and well-planned residential growth (2019:
45%, 2021: 36%). The results also indicated that residents believe a higher
Page 184 of 226
priority should be placed on transportation planning quality (78%), and, the
design and layout of the city (90%).
The street connectivity effort initiated by staff began with a memorandum to the
Planning Commission in December 2019. Since that time, the Pasco Hearing
Examiner has approved 1,487 residential lots. There are more than 4,300
homes undergoing development review or in construction as of November
2023. This represents approximately 28% of forecasted residential growth
accounted for in the Pasco Comprehensive Plan. In related efforts, the City has
successfully addressed the increasing housing affordability challenges with the
adoption of code amendments to increase residential building capacity, and the
recently adopted Housing Action and Implementation Plan. A pending update
related to the Residential Design Standards (scheduled for City Council on
November 27, 2023) includes several changes and refinements to increase
flexibility and streamline housing development. This effort has received support
from the Home-Builders Association of the Tri-Cities.
The City's efforts to improve housing affordability and offer more housing
choices for residents highlight the need for a transportation infrastructure that
can accommodate growth. However, ensuring a functional transportation
the and Plan, Comprehensive the Council in priority a system, Goals,
Transportation System Master Plan, is becoming more challenging, regardless
of recent housing affordability efforts.
Proposed Recommendations
Staff is recommending a maximum block length of 660 feet, with two options
that can include either the dedication of a public right-of-way for vehicle use, or
a non-motorized accessway. The benefit of the options is that it allows each
development the flexibility to utilize the appropriate access type. The non-
motorized access option would significantly reduce the right-of-way needs, and
allow and as network, pedestrian bicycle city a of buildout the for the
Plan. is Staff Master Pedestrian and Bicycle 2011 the in recommended
proposing that the maximum block length for public street to public street, be
990 feet. The 990 feet threshold is a significant increase from the 660 feet
originally proposed, and is higher than the maximum currently required by the
City of Kennewick. The addition of access management standards are also
included, which are critical to ensuring that the functionality of the cities
collector and arterial system remain in place.
The proposed connectivity and access standards apply citywide; however, they
are presently established as requirements in the Broadmoor Master Plan
Overlay Land Use and the new Mixed-Use Zoning District.
Support:
The Community and Economic Development Department has received letters
of agencies, local and regional and the from support state, several
Page 185 of 226
organizations in support of this proposal. This also included public input at the
Pasco Planning Commission from the Pasco Fire Department and Public
Works Department, the Washington State Department of Transportation's
Multi-Modal Planning Office. The following organizations and agencies have
provided their support:
Ben Franklin Transit
Benton-Franklin Council of Governments
Washington State Department of Transportation
Pasco Fire Department
Visit Tri-Cities
Bike Tri-Cities
Additionally, the effort was referenced by the Washington State Transportation
in their 2023 report to the WA State Legislature as a best practice to address
vehicle miles travel and congestion reduction strategies. Most recently, the
Washington State Transportation Commission contacted the Department to
reference the strategies of this effort to include in the upcoming Washington
State Transportation Plan.
Further, staff would like to highlight the comments received on prior efforts from
members of the community stating the need for more effective transportation
planning. This input has come in multiple settings, including during the
development of the Comprehensive Plan Update, Broadmoor Master Plan,
Transportation System Master Plan, countless verbal, print and electronic
communications to the City Council and City staff. With the continued and
upcoming rapid growth of the City, setting the stage now for coordinated land
use and transportation planning is critical.
Page 186 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 1
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
RELATING TO STREET CONNECTIVITY, AMENDING SECTIONS
21.05.020 “PURPOSE;” 21.05.030 “APPLICATION OF THIS TITLE;” 21.05.040
“EXCEPTIONS;” 21.05.060 “APPROVAL REQUIRED;” 21.10.020 “TERMS
DEFINED;” CHAPTER 21.15 “STREETS;” AND SECTION 21.20.010 “BLOCK
LENGTH” WITHIN TITLE 21 “PASCO URBAN AREA SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS” OF THE PASCO MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, the development of a more complete transportation network can improve
pedestrian safety, increase mobility options for residents and visitors and promote improvements
in public health; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council adopted the Transportation System Master Plan via
Resolution No. 4220 on August 1, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco Transportation System Master Plan documents the operational and
safety performance of the City’s existing and future transportation system and provides strategies
that will support growth in and around the community through the year 2040; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco Transportation System Master Plan recognizes that the layout and
design of the local transportation system is foundational to neighborhood livability. It better serves
the full spectrum of community travel needs which can vary over time based on household size,
income, age, physical abilities, and personal preferences; and
WHEREAS, to effectively implement the Transportation System Master Plan will require
a series of updates and amendments to existing city policies, codes and regulations related to land
development, transportation management and capital project funding; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco Transportation System Master Plan identified amendments to the
Pasco Municipal Code including updates to the development regulations and subdivision code as
a major action; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco Transportation System Master Plan recommends updates to facility
spacing guidelines, access management spacing standards, and street connectivity standards; and
WHEREAS, Land Use Policy 4-A of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan encourages the
reduction and dependency of vehicle travel, and encourage pedestrian and multi-modal options by
providing compatible land-uses in and around residential neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, Land Use Policy 4-C of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan encourages the
development of walkable communities by increasing mixed-use (commercial/residential)
developments that provide households with neighborhood and commercial shopping
opportunities; and
Page 187 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 2
WHEREAS, Land Use Policy 4-E of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan encourages the
orderly development of land by emphasizing connectivity and efficiency of the transportation
network; and
WHEREAS, Land Use Policy 4-F of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan supports mixed
use, smart growth, infill, and compact developments with transit and pedestrian amenities that
promote a healthy community; and
WHEREAS, Economic Development Policy 1-E of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan
recognizes that infrastructure, including transportation and utility planning, is vital to economic
development and attracting businesses; and
WHEREAS, Economic Development Policy 1-F of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan
supports and encourages residential and commercial mixed-use developments that provide
neighborhood shopping and services and promote walkable neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, Economic Development Policy 3-C of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan
is to provide appropriate access through a combination of pathways, sidewalks, non-motorized
travel lands and parking; and
WHEREAS, Transportation Policy 1-A of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan requires
participation in the metropolitan and regional transportation planning efforts of the Benton-
Franklin Council of Governments; and
WHEREAS, Transportation Policy 1-B of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan requires
that our transportation and land use planning efforts and policy that meet the needs of the
community and the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, Transportation Policy 1-E of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan encourages
the City to provide increased neighborhood travel connections for public safety as well as
providing for transportation disbursement; and
WHEREAS, Transportation Policy 1-F of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan requires
the development of interconnected network of streets, trails, and other public ways during the
development process while preserving neighborhood identity; and
WHEREAS, Transportation Policy 1-H of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan requires
that the City maintain level-of-service “D” on all arterials and collectors and level-of- service “C”
during the PM peak-hour; and
WHEREAS, Transportation Policy 1-I of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan requires
developments to meet the standards of the Pasco Complete Streets Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Transportation Policy I-J of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan requires the
City to collaborate with appropriate agencies to conduct a review of street design standards; and
Page 188 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 3
WHEREAS, Transportation Policy 2-B of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan requires
the City to collaborate with Ben Franklin Transit in programming transit routes, transit stops, and
supporting facilities that increase user accessibility during the development process; and
WHEREAS, Transportation Policy 2-D of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan encourages
bicycle and pedestrian travel by providing safe and purposeful bicycle and pedestrian routes; and
WHEREAS, Transportation Policy 2-G of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan requires
the City to collaborate with transit agencies on the design of arterial streets to improve transit
access; and
WHEREAS, Implementation Policy 1-A of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan requires
the City to maintain codes, standards, and guidelines, which are clear, concise, and objective; and
WHEREAS, Implementation Policy 4-A of the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan requires
the City to coordinate with other governmental units in preparing development regulations; and
WHEREAS, the 2011 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan identified a series of goals and
policies to address the growing demands of bicycling and walking as a means of travel and to
achieve a more balanced transportation system; and
WHEREAS, The Pasco City Council adopted Ordinance No. 4389 – Complete Streets
Policy on July 2, 2018 indicating that the development of a more complete transportation network
can improve pedestrian safety, increase the transportation networks capacity and promote
improvements in public health; and
WHEREAS, Pasco’s Complete Street Policy states that transportation costs can be
reduced when local infrastructure encourages active transportation, which helps families replace
car trips with bicycling, walking or taking public transit; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 3853 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions adopted by
the Pasco City Council in 2018 endorsed a set a policies and procedures satisfying the Washington
State Public Work’s Board requirement and to recognize that the policies will benefit the City of
Pasco in reducing greenhouse gas emissions; and
WHEREAS, Policy G-1 of Pasco’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Resolution
encourages development patterns that utilize existing infrastructure, reduce the need for new roads,
utilizes and enhance non-automobile transportation; and
WHEREAS, Policy J-1 of Pasco’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Resolution
states the City shall consider transportation projects that will contribute to a reduction in vehicle
miles travelled per capita, while maintaining economic vitality and sustainability; and
Page 189 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 4
WHEREAS, Policy J-2 of Pasco’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions Resolution
states the City shall provide safe and convenient access for pedestrians and bicyclists, to, across,
and along major transit priority streets; and
WHEREAS, the 2022 Pasco Fire Department Master Plan indicates that the distance
between the fire station and the location of the emergency influences total response time the most.
The quality and connectivity of streets, traffic congestion, and geography all play crucial roles in
travel time performance; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council recognized the importance of a highly functional,
multi-modal transportation network supporting the integration and facilitation of traffic flow,
pedestrian, bicycle and non-motorized modes of transportation as a Council Goal in 2018-2019;
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council stated ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency and
effectiveness in the use of public resources in the delivery of municipal services, programs and
long-term maintenance and viability of public facilities as a Council Goal in 2018-2019; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council adopted Resolution No. 3895 on September 21, 2020,
that establish a set of primary Council Goals for years 2020-2021; and
WHEREAS, updating design standards for the development of new neighborhoods and
re-development to promote greater neighborhood cohesion through design elements, including
walkability is supportive of Council Goals on Quality of Life; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council adopted Resolution 4182 on May 16, 2022, that
establish a set of primary Council Goals for years 2022-2023; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council Goal for a Community Transportation Network
emphasizes the promotion of a highly functional multi-modal transportation system; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council Goals specifically call out the application of the
adopted Transportation System Master Plan including development of policies, regulations,
programs, and projects that provide for greater connectivity, strategic investment, mobility, multi-
modal systems, accessibility, efficiency, and safety.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Section 21.05.020 entitled “Purpose” of the Pasco Municipal Code
shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
21.05.020 Purpose.
The purpose of this title is to regulate the division of land and development of land
within the Pasco Urban Area. This title is to also further the purpose of promoting
Page 190 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 5
the health, safety, convenience, comfort, prosperity and general welfare of the
present and future inhabitants of the Pasco Urban Area, and to:
(1) Prevent the overcrowding of land;
(2) Lessen congestion and promote safe and convenient travel by the public on
streets and highways;
(3) Promote the effective use of land;
(4) Provide for adequate light and air;
(5) Facilitate adequate provision for water, sewerage, drainage, parks and
recreational areas, and other public requirements;
(6) Provide for proper ingress and egress;
(7) Provide for the expeditious review and approval of proposed land divisions
which comply with this title, the Pasco Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, other City
Plans, policies and land use controls, and Chapter 58.17 RCW;
(8) Adequately provide for the housing, commercial and industrial needs of the
citizens of the state and City;
(9) Require uniform monumenting of land divisions and conveyance by accurate
legal descriptions;
(10) Implement the goals, objectives and policies of the Pasco Comprehensive
Plan.
Section 2. That Section 21.05.030 entitled “Application of this Title” of the Pasco
Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
21.05.030 Application of this Title.
Any plat hereafter made, or any subdivision or any part thereof lying within
the limits of the City, shall be prepared, presented for approval and recorded as
herein prescribed. The regulations contained in this title shall apply to any
development activity, the subdivision of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two or
more lots, tracts or other division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer
of ownership, whether immediate or future, including the resubdivision or
replatting of land or lots. They shall apply to each situation where there is a
dedication of streets, alleys, easements and/or land for other public uses.
Page 191 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 6
Section 3. That Section 21.05.040 entitled “Exceptions” of the Pasco Municipal Code
shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
21.05.040 Exceptions.
The provisions of this title shall not apply to:
(1) Cemeteries and other burial plots while used for that purpose;
(2) Division of land not containing a dedication, in which the smallest lot created
by the division exceeds five acres in area;
(3) Divisions made by testamentary provisions or the laws of descent;
(4) Any division of land for the purpose of adjusting the boundary lines between
platted or unplatted lots or both, which does not create any new or additional lot,
tract, site or division, which contains insufficient area and dimension to meet
minimum requirements for a building site;
(5) The dedication of sufficient and appropriate public street right-of-way where
the property line is located within 30 feet of the centerline of a clearly recognized
and existing local access or collector public street; or within 40 feet of the
centerline of a clearly recognized and existing primary or secondary arterial street;
or within 50 feet of the centerline of a clearly recognized and existing primary
arterial street containing a landscape median.
Section 4. That Section 21.05.060 entitled “Approval required” of the Pasco
Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
21.05.060 Plat Approval required.
Before any preliminary plat shall be recorded or be of any validity, it must be
approved by the City Council Hearing Examiner and have such other agency
approvals as set forth herein.
Before any short plat shall be recorded or have any validity, it must be approved
administratively by the Director of Community and Economic Development and
have such other agency approvals as set forth herein.
Section 5. That Section 21.10.020 entitled “Terms Defined” of the Pasco Municipal
Code shall be and hereby is amended
21.10.020 Terms defined.
“Accessibility” means the quality of travel and takes place at the community and
individual level to provide access to various land uses. It focuses on travel time,
Page 192 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 7
travel cost, travel options, comfort, and risk while addressing the needs of all within
the community.
“Alley” means a dedicated narrow service way, not more than 20 feet wide,
providing a secondary means of public access to abutting properties.
“Binding site plan” means a drawing to scale utilized for the purposes of creating
lots for selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring property rights from one person,
firm, or corporation to another. A binding site plan:
(a) Identifies and shows the areas and locations of all streets, roads,
improvements, parcels, utilities, open spaces, and other information as may be
required by this title;
(b) Contains inscriptions or attachments setting forth such appropriate
limitations and conditions for the use of land as specified by this title; and
(c) Contains provisions making any development be in conformity with the site
plan for all such land.
“Block” means a group of lots, tracts, or parcels bound by a street and circulation
routes intended for public access within a well-defined and fixed boundary.
“Block Length” means the distance as measured along the street centerline of
intersecting streets from bounding intersecting street centerline to bounding
intersecting centerline.
“Boundary line adjustment” means the relocation of the boundaries between two or
more lots, which relocation does not result in the creation of any additional lot or
lots.
“Comprehensive Plan” means the current Comprehensive Plan for the City,
adopted by the City Council pursuant to state law.
“Cul-de-sac” means a road closed at one end by a circular area of sufficient size for
turning vehicles around.
“Dedication” means the deliberate conveyance of land by an owner or owners to
the City of Pasco, for any general and public uses, reserving to the owner or owners
no other rights than such as are compatible with the full exercise and enjoyment of
the public uses to which the property has been devoted.
“Developer, subdivider, platter or owner” means any person, firm or corporation
undertaking the subdividing or resubdividing of a lot, tract or parcel of land as, or
on behalf of, the owner thereof.
Page 193 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 8
“Easement” means a grant by the property owner to the public, corporation, or
persons, of the use of a strip of land for a specific purpose and, on or over which,
the owner will not erect any permanent improvements which serve to interfere with
the free exercise of that right.
“Final approval” means that approval given by the City Council, which authorizes
the subdivider to record his/her plat.
“Final plat” means the plan of a plat, subdivision, or dedication, or any portion
thereof, prepared for filing for record by the County Auditor, and containing all
elements and requirements set forth for final plats in these regulations.
“Hammerhead/T” means a roadway that provides a “T” shaped, three-point
turnaround space for emergency equipment.
“Improvements” means any required improvements, including streets, curb, gutter,
sidewalk, storm drainage, landscaping, utilities, pavement markings, signing, and
other appropriate improvements.
“Lot” means a portion of a subdivision, or other parcel of land, intended as a unit
for transfer of ownership or for development, being of sufficient area and
dimensions to meet minimum zoning requirements for width and area. The term
shall include tracts or parcels.
“Lot size averaging” means the area of individual lots within a development may
vary from the zoned minimum lot area; provided, that the density in the
development is compliant with the established zoning and Comprehensive Plan,
and each individual lot in the application complies with all other restrictions set
forth in PMC 21.20.070.
“Minor arterial” means a street or road which forms part of the arterial street
system, the function of which is to collect traffic from the local or residential streets
for delivery to the primary arterials.
“Mobility” means the ability and level of ease of moving people, goods, and
services.
“Monument” means a permanent-type survey marker, which conforms to the City
of Pasco standard detail for monuments, or an approved substitute.
“Neighborhood traffic management measures” means strategies to slow traffic, and
potentially reduce volumes, creating a more inviting environment for pedestrians
and bicyclists. Neighborhood traffic management measures include strategies such
as median islands, raised crosswalks, traffic humps, speed cushions and other
strategies in accordance with industry standards and best practices.
Page 194 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 9
“Pedestrian way” means a right-of-way dedicated to public use which cuts across a
block to facilitate pedestrian access to adjacent streets and properties.
“Plat or subdivision” means an area of land which has been divided into two or
more lots, tracts, parcels or other divisions of land, and shall include a map or maps
related thereto for the purpose, whether immediate or future, of transfer of
ownership, or for building developments, including all designations in street lines,
alley lines, public area boundaries, lot lines, easements, rights-of-way, pavement
widths, curb lines, location and size of utilities, location and size of land areas to
be dedicated; those divisions of land for agricultural purposes, where each parcel is
five acres or more in area and which do not include any new streets, easements,
rights-of-way or other provisions for necessary public areas and facilities; and
further provided, that this definition shall not apply to the division by description
of a portion of a platted lot.
"Policy” means the current practice of the City of Pasco based on industry
standards, guidelines, and current industry practices.
“Preliminary plat” means an approximate drawing of the proposed layout of streets,
blocks, lots and other elements of a subdivision or plat from which the City Hearing
Examiner gives preliminary approval to the general layout features of the
subdivision or plat.
“Primary arterial” means a street or road of great continuity which serves or is
intended to serve as the principal traffic way between separated areas of the City or
region and is designated in the Comprehensive Plan, or otherwise designated, as a
limited access highway, major thoroughfare, boulevard, parkway or other
equivalent term to identify those streets that comprise the basic structure of the
regional traffic plan.
“Public right-of-way” means any publicly owned land set aside for surface
transportation purposes, including vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian transportation,
whether improved or not improved.
“Secondary arterial” means a street or road which forms part of the arterial street
system, the function of which is to collect traffic from the local or residential streets
for delivery to the primary arterials.
“Short plat” or “short subdivision” means the division or redivision of land into
nine or fewer lots for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer of ownership.
“Street, connectivity” means street or road connections or intersections generally
achieved through the use of a grid-street pattern with shorter block lengths.
Street, Dead-End. “Dead-end street” means a street similar to a cul-de-sac, but
providing no turnaround at its closed end.
Page 195 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 10
Street, Frontage. “Frontage street” means an access street which is generally
parallel to and adjacent to arterials, streets, traffic ways, limited access highways
or railroad rights-of-way; and which provides access to abutting properties and
protection from through traffic.
Street, Local Access. “Local access street” means a street intended primarily for
access to abutting properties. of limited continuity, which serves or is intended to
serve the local needs of the immediate community.
Street, Private. “Private street” means a street of limited continuity, which serves
or is intended to serve the local needs of the immediate community and which has
not been dedicated to the public.
Street, Public. “Public street” means a street, whether improved or unimproved,
held in public ownership and intended to be open as a matter of right for public
vehicular travel and to provide access now or in the future to adjacent properties.
Street, Stub. “Street stub” means a temporary street ending; i.e., where the street
will be extended through adjacent property in the future, as those properties
develop. Not a permanent street-end, dead-end street or cul-de-sac.
“Street tree” means a tree planted in the right-of-way adjacent to the street.
“Tax parcel segregation” means the separation of lots of record into two or more
tax parcels for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer of ownership, and which
segregation does not result in the creation of more parcels than lots of record.
“Transportation Plan” means the Comprehensive Plan, Bike Ped Master Plan,
Transportation Improvement Plan, Transportation System Master Plan, Capitol
Improvement Plan, and other documents created by the City for the purpose of
planning future transportation improvements.
“Urban growth area” means that area designated by the County pursuant to RCW
36.70A.110, identifying the limits of the extension of urban facilities and services.
[Ord. 4496 § 2, 2020; Ord. 3736 § 2, 2005; Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 §§
26.08.010–26.08.290.]
Section 6. That Chapter 21.15 entitled “Streets” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be
and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
21.15.010 Street connectivity layout.
(1) Continuation of Existing Streets. Streets shall normally continue as an
extension of existing streets unless good planning dictates a different solution.
Street patterns shall take into consideration access needed to develop adjacent
Page 196 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 11
properties. Sketches of a proposed street system to serve adjoining properties may
be required if it is owned by the subdivider.
(1) Connectivity to Abutting Lands. The street system of a proposed subdivision
shall be designed to provide direct and efficient connections to existing, proposed,
and planned streets adjacent to the subdivision. Wherever a proposed development
abuts unplatted land or a future development phase of an existing development,
street stubs shall be provided to allow access to future abutting subdivisions and to
extend the street system into the surrounding area. Street ends shall contain
turnarounds constructed to Uniform Fire Code standards and shall be designed to
facilitate future extension in terms of grading, width, and temporary barricades.
(2) Future Street Plan. Subdivision applicants must demonstrate, pursuant to
City standards, that the proposed development does not preclude future street
connections to adjacent lands.
(3) Public Street and Street Connectivity Requirements. Dedicating or deeding
property for right-of-way or a portion thereof to the City for public streets within,
or along the boundaries of all residential subdivisions or developments, shall be
required as a condition of application approval where the following can be
demonstrated:
(a) Facts support that such dedication is reasonably necessary as a result
of the impact created by the proposed development;
(b) Such dedication will result in proportionate mitigation of the impact
in the reasonably foreseeable future;
(c) Connectivity to the existing or foreseeable future public right-of-
way is feasible; and
(d) One or more of the following circumstances are met:
(i) A city transportation plan indicates the necessity of a new or
additional right-of-way or portion thereof for street purposes;
(ii) The dedication is necessary to provide additions of right-of-
way to existing right-of-way to meet city road standards;
(iii) The dedication is necessary to extend or to complete the
existing or future neighborhood street pattern;
(iv) The dedication is necessary to comply with road standards
and city transportation plans;
(v) The dedication is necessary to provide a public
transportation system that supports future development of abutting
Page 197 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 12
property consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or Pasco
Municipal Code.
(24) Dead-End Streets. Dead-end streets are prohibited; except, where the
Comprehensive Plan or preliminary plat indicates a street is to continue past the
subdivider’s property, the City may allow the dead end until such time as the street
can be built through at a later date. Dead-end streets may be permitted in the R-S-
20 and R-S-12 districts as provided in PMC 21.15.080.
(35) Half Streets. Half streets shall be prohibited except that the City may permit
their inclusion in cases where a normal alignment of a present or future planned
street will fall half on an adjoining ownership.
(46) Street Names. When practical, Streets shall be named to conform with
existing streets on the same or reasonably similar alignment. New street names shall
be reviewed by the Planning Department, the Fire Department and/or the
Emergency 911 Coordinator to ensure that no confusion with existing street names
occurs. [Ord. 3736 § 1, 2005; Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 26.12.010.]
21.15.020 Street standards.
(1) Angle of Intersection. Under normal conditions, Sstreets shall be laid out so
as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles, except where topography and
other conditions justify variations. The minimum angle of intersection of streets
shall be 70 degrees.
(2) Intersections on opposite sides of a common street shall either be aligned or
be offset a minimum of 125 feet.
(3) Street Grades. Street grades shall be constructed as directed by the City
Engineer and shall conform with the local topography to provide good access to the
adjacent properties. The maximum street grade shall not exceed 10 percent unless
specifically allowed by the City Engineer.
(4) Horizontal Sight Distances. A tangent at least 100 feet long shall be
introduced between reverse curves on primary and secondary arterials. When
tangents along a street deflect from each other by more than 10 degrees, they shall
be connected by a curve with a radius adequate to ensure a sight distance of not less
than 100 feet for secondary arterials, and of such radius as the City Engineer shall
determine for primary arterials and other special cases. [Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999; Code
1970 § 26.12.020.]
21.15.030 Street improvements.
(1) Adequate and proper right-of-way improvements shall be required at the
time adjoining property is developed and shall be required on all property. As a
Page 198 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 13
minimum a three-quarter street standard will be required if the property being
developed only fronts on one side of the street.
(2) Adequate and proper right-of-way improvements shall include curb, gutter,
sidewalk, illumination, traffic control devices, drainage control, engineered road
bases, asphalt driving and parking lanes, non-motorized facilities for bicyclists and
pedestrians, and monumentation. All such improvements shall be approved by the
City prior to construction and acceptance. The three-quarter street standard shall
include curb, gutter and sidewalk on the developed side and a minimum of two
complete traffic lanes.
(3) The developer of real property shall be responsible for installing the
required improvements within the respective half of right-of-way width abutting
the real property being developed, provided such improvements consist of at least
two traffic lanes.
(4) Minimum sidewalk widths, not including the six-inch curb, shall not be less
than the minimum dimension for sidewalks as follows:
(a) Residential zones: four and one-half feet;
(b) Commercial zones: six and one-half feet. [Ord. 4454A § 3, 2019; Ord. 4454
§ 3, 2019; Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 26.12.030.]
(4) Right-of-way widths shall be adequate for current, near-term, and long-term
growth, and shall be adequate to accommodate bike/ped facilities suitable for all
ages and capabilities in accordance with the Complete Streets ordinance, and per
the standard specifications as prepared by the City Engineer.
(5) Functional classification designation and spacing is to be determined by the
City Engineer based on application of road spacing recommendations provided in
the Pasco Municipal Code, with consideration for existing nearby road
classifications, existing ROW width, and accommodating areas of inadequate road
infrastructure.
(6) All improvements within the City of Pasco public right-of-way shall be in
conformance with the Pasco Complete Policy 12.15.
21.15.040 Arterials.
Arrangement of arterial streets in a subdivision shall conform to the Comprehensive
Plan as adopted by the City.
Principal Arterials connect major activity centers as well as the interstate system.
They will serve a variety of travel movements supporting longer/lengthier trips and
are primarily intended to serve regional traffic movement.
Page 199 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 14
Minor Arterials create direct connections through the city. They generally provide
the primary connection to other Arterial or Collector Streets and access to larger
developed areas and neighborhoods.
(1) Right-of-Way Widths. Minimum right-of-way widths for all arterials shall
be as follows:
(a) Arterial, primary with landscaped median: 100 feet;
(b) Arterial, primary without landscaped median: 80 feet;
(c) Arterial, secondary: 80 feet.
(2) Roadway Widths. Minimum roadway widths for all arterials, measured
from the face of curb to the face of curb, shall be as per the standard specifications
as prepared by the City Engineer. [Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 26.12.040.]
21.15.050 Collector streets.
When possible, collector streets shall be planned to conveniently channel traffic
from access streets onto the primary and secondary arterials.
Collectors provide local traffic circulation throughout the city and serve to funnel
traffic from the arterial street network to streets of the same or lower classification.
They typically have minor access restrictions.
(1) Right-of-Way Widths. Minimum right-of-way widths for all collector
streets shall not be less than 60 feet.
(2) Roadway Widths. Minimum roadway widths for all collector streets shall
not be less than 38 feet. [Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 26.12.050.]
21.15.055 Neighborhood Collector Streets
Neighborhood Collector Streets are facilities with locations where local access
needs should be balanced with enhanced pedestrian and bicycle amenities and
provide connections between several adjacent neighborhoods and the collector or
arterial network. These streets shall provide direct and efficient access and maintain
slow vehicle operating speeds to accommodate safe use by all modes and provide
local neighborhood access.
21.15.060 Local access streets.
When possible, access streets shall be planned so as to discourage through traffic
to short cut onto collector streets and primary and secondary arterials.
Page 200 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 15
Local Access Streets provide local access and circulation for traffic, connect
neighborhoods, and often function as through routes for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Local Streets should maintain slow vehicle operating speeds while providing
convenient access to multimodal travel.
(1) Right-of-Way Widths. Minimum right-of-way widths for all local access
streets shall not be less than 60 feet.
(2) Roadway Widths. Minimum roadway widths for all local access streets shall
not be less than the following dimensions:
(a) Thirty-eight feet from the face of curb to the face of curb on
residential access streets;
(b) Thirty-six feet width of asphalt pavement for streets in the RS-12
and RS-20 zones without curbs. [Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 26.12.060.]
21.15.070 Cul-de-sacs.
Cul-de-sacs will be permitted where topography or other conditions justify their
use.
A cul-de-sac shall only be permitted when the applicant demonstrates that natural
features or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, and the Pasco
Municipal Code make it impossible to provide a more connected street network.
Where the City Engineer determines that a cul-de-sac is allowed, all of the
following standards shall be met:
(1) Cul-de-sacs should normally be less than 300 feet, but will be permitted up
to 600 feet in length
(1) The cul-de-sac shall not exceed a length of 600 feet. The length of the cul-
de-sac shall be measured along the centerline of the roadway from the near side of
the intersecting street to the farthest point of the cul-de-sac.
(2) Right-of-Way Widths. Minimum right-of-way widths for all cul-de-sacs
shall not be less than 60 feet with a 110-foot diameter turnaround.
(2) The cul-de-sac is in conformance with the most updated version of the
Design and Construction Standards and Specifications.
(3) Roadway Widths. Minimum roadway widths for all cul-de-sacs shall not be
not less than:
(3) The cul-de-sac shall provide a pedestrian and bicycle accessway connecting
to adjacent developments, or adjacent developable lands. Such accessways shall
conform to the latest City Design and Construction Standards and Specifications
Page 201 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 16
(a) Thirty-six feet from the face of curb to the face of curb, with an 90-
foot turnaround;
(b) Thirty-six feet of the pavement width pavement, with a 80-foot
turnaround in the RS-12 and RS-20 zones without curbs. [Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999;
Code 1970 § 26.12.070.]
21.15.080 Hammerhead/T.
Hammerhead/Ts are only permitted in R-S-20 and R-S-12 zoning districts where
property was platted in the county prior to annexation and existing development
precludes the expectation that a standard cul-de-sac can be developed.
(1) Dead-end streets with hammerheads should normally be less than 300 feet,
but will be permitted up to 450 feet in length.
(2) Streets with hammerheads shall not serve more than eight lots.
(3) Right-of-Way Widths for Streets Intersecting Hammerheads. Minimum
right-of-way widths for all dead-end streets with hammerheads serving no more
than eight lots shall not be less than 40 feet, with no on-street parking.
(4) Right-of-Way Widths for Hammerheads. Minimum right-of-way widths for
hammerheads shall not be less than 30 feet, with no on-street parking.
(5) Roadway Widths. Minimum roadway widths for all dead-end streets with
hammerheads shall not be less than the following dimensions:
(a) Thirty-two feet from the face of curb to the face of curb;
(b) Thirty feet of pavement width where there is no curb and gutter;
(c) Twenty-eight feet of pavement for hammerheads;
(6) Hammerheads shall comply with the minimum requirements set forth in
Figure 21.15.080.01 or 21.15.080.02. [Ord. 3736 § 3, 2005; Code 1970 §
26.12.075.]
21.15.090 Alleys.
The developer may provide alleys in a development, subject to the following
standards:
(1) Dead-end alleys shall be prohibited unless there is provided a turnaround
with an asphalt diameter of 80 feet and a right-of-way diameter of 100 feet.
Page 202 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 17
(2) Sharp changes in direction of alleys shall be avoided. Where such changes
cannot be avoided, there shall be a corner cut-off with a minimum inside radius of
50 feet shall be provided.
(3) Right-of-Way Widths. Minimum right-of-way width of all alleys shall not
be less than 20 feet.
(4) Roadway Widths. Minimum roadway widths for all alleys shall not be less
than 16 feet. [Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 26.12.080.]
21.15.100 Pedestrian and bicycle accessways.
Pedestrian ways may be required by the City to allow cross access for pedestrians
in areas of exceptionally long blocks or for access to recreational facilities or
schools.
At approved cul-de-sacs, dead-end streets, gaps in pedestrian connectivity, or along
blocks approved at more than the maximum block length standard, pedestrian and
bicycle accessways must be constructed between lots to avoid excessive travel
distance bicycles and pedestrians. Accessways shall be provided within dedicated
right-of-way. Accessways shall be located to provide a reasonably direct
connection between likely pedestrian destinations and shall be consistent with the
Pasco Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan, Transportation System Master Plan and
Comprehensive Plan where applicable.
A reasonably direct connection is a route that minimizes out-of-direction travel for
people likely to use the connection considering terrain, safety, and likely
destination.
Required accessways shall conform to the most updated version of the Design and
Construction Standards and Specifications and the City’s current policies. Required
accessways shall be designed to encourage non-motorized use and be adequately
and appropriately lit for night-time use. When pedestrian and bicycle accessways
provide connections through adjacent blocks, the accessways shall align to provide
a direct path and include safe and accessible street crossing treatments.
At each pedestrian and bicycle accessway abutting a neighborhood collector or
local access street, a complete mid-block pedestrian crossing will be provided
across the street. Improvements outside the developed parcel may be required to
provide a complete crossing and a code compliant receiving ADA ramp. When
streets are wider than 2 lanes, a pedestrian refuge island may be required.
(1) Right-of-Way Widths. Minimum right-of-way widths for all pedestrian
ways shall not be less than 10 feet. [Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 26.12.090.]
Section 7. That Section 21.20.010 entitled “Block length” of the Pasco Municipal
Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
Page 203 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 18
21.20.010 Block length. Transportation System Standards.
In general, intersecting streets shall be provided at such intervals as to serve cross
traffic adequately and to meet existing streets or customary subdivision practices in
the vicinity. Blocks shall not exceed 1,320 feet. Blocks for business use shall
normally not be less than 600 feet in length. [Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 §
26.16.010.]
Streets, alleys, and bikeways shall be designed to provide continuous, efficient, and
economical travel ways, including pedestrian and bicycle travel, and create a safe
and pleasant environment. In order to promote efficient vehicular and pedestrian
circulation throughout the city, an interconnected street network shall be provided
through development activities.
(1) Facility Spacing Guidelines
Functional Classification Maximum Spacing
Principal Arterial 1 to 2 miles
Minor Arterial 1 mile
Collector ½ mile
Neighborhood Collector ¼ mile
Local Access Street or Bicycle Pedestrian
Facilities
660 feet
a. Maximum spacing refers to the distance between facilities with the same or
higher functional classification. Deviations, when justified, due to a significant
barrier such as topography, existing development or presence of natural areas
are subject to approval by the City Engineer.
(2) Access Management Spacing Standards
Access management practices will be implemented at the discretion of the City
Engineer based on site-specific constraints, anticipated future projects, safety concerns,
spacing from intersections, intersection and driveway queue logistics, and other
considerations. Below is a general guideline for access management spacing, though
more stringent requirements may be imposed during development review. Roads with
current or planned raised curbs or medians will likely be limited to right-in/right-out
only driveway access.
Spacing Guidelines Principal
Arterials
Minor
Arterials Collectors Neighborhood
Collectors
Local
Access
Streets
Minimum Driveway
Spacing (Driveway to
Driveway)
300 feet 250 feet 150 feet 75 feet N/A
Page 204 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 19
Minimum Full-Access
Driveway Spacing
(Setback from
Intersection)
300 feet 250 feet 150 feet 75 feet 25 feet
Minimum Right-In/Right-
Out Driveway Spacing
(Setback from
Intersection)
150 feet 125 feet 75 feet 50 feet 25 feet
1. All distances measured from the edge of adjacent approaches.
2. Driveways shall be located on the lowest classification of roadway abutting the
development unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
3. The Washington State Department of Transportation requires 1,320 between an
interchange and the closest driveway. (Source: State of Washington.
Washington Administrative Code Section 468-52-040 Access Control
Classification System and Standards.
(3) Street Connectivity Standards
Spacing Guidelines Principal
Arterials
Minor
Arterials Collectors Neighborhood
Collectors
Local
Access
Streets
Standard Maximum Block
Length 660 feet 660 feet 660 feet 660 feet 660 feet
a. A pedestrian and bicycle accessway may be a substitute for a public street
when calculating block length, but in no case shall the distance between
public streets exceed 990 feet.
b. Block length is measured from centerline to centerline of intersecting streets
c. Provisions for a direct path for bikes and pedestrians, safe routes to school
(if applicable), and neighborhood traffic management measures will be
required when within ½ mile of the following unless the public road
network provides a shorter or equivalent trip length:
i. Current or planned public transportation facility
ii. Public School, library, or education facility
iii. Public park, trail, open space, or recreational facility
iv. Health related services or facilities (e.g., hospital, urgent care,
pharmacy)
(4) Standard maximum block length may be exceeded if an applicant demonstrates
the existence of one or more of the following conditions:
a. Physical conditions preclude a block length of 660 feet or less. These
conditions may include topography or the existence of physical features,
including, but not limited to wetlands, ponds, streams, channels, rivers,
lakes or steep grades, or a resource under protection by State or Federal law;
Page 205 of 226
Ordinance – Amending PMC – 21 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations” - 20
b. Buildings or other existing development on adjacent lands, including
previously subdivided but vacant lots/parcels that physically preclude a
block length of 660 feet or less, considering the potential for re-
development;
c. Where the extension of a public street into the proposed development would
create a block length exceeding 660 feet, the total block length shall be as
close to 660 feet as possible.
(5) When block length exceeds the established maximums due to one of the
conditions listed in subsections (4)(a) through (4)(d), a mid-block pedestrian
and bicycle street crossing shall be provided.
Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word
of this Ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this
Ordinance.
Section 9. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including scrivener’s errors
or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or
numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days
after approval, passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this _____ day of
____________, 2023.
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Published: _________________________
Page 206 of 226
WHAT IS CONNECTIVITY?
The degree to which the transportation system
provides access to destinations
•Access: quality of travel (options, comfort, risks, time)
•Connectivity: routes that connect origins and destinations
•Mobility: ease of travel for moving goods, services, people
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Page 207 of 226
MEASURING CONNECTIVITY?
Strategies from the United States Department of Transportation
•Short Block Lengths
•Intersection Density
•Multi-Modal Prioritization
•Safe and Visible Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities
•Complete Streets Policy
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation www.transportation.gov/mission/health/promoting-connectivity
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Page 208 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system
including, but not limited to:
Application of the adopted Transportation System Master Plan
including development of policies,regulations,programs,and
projects that provide for greater connectivity,strategic investment,
mobility,multi-modal systems,accessibility,efficiency,and safety.Page 209 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Objective:Meet established Goals, Policies and Best Practices
◦Pasco City Council Goals (2010-Current)
◦2011 Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (Resolution #3021)◦2018 Complete Streets Policy (Ordinance #4389)◦2018 Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction (Resolution #3853)◦2020-2021 Pasco City Council Goals (Resolution #3985)
◦2022-2023 Pasco City Council Goals (Resolution #4182)
◦2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance #4537)
◦Transportation System Master Plan (Resolution #4220)Page 210 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Summary and Timeline
December 2019: Memorandum to Planning Commission
January–October 2020: Workshops and Public Hearings (8)
Spring –Fall 2021: Workshops and Updates to Pasco City Council
October 2020:Recommendation from Planning Commission
August 2021: Direction from City Council for evaluation/collaboration
October–November 2022:Workshops & Public HearingsPage 211 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Stakeholder Meetings
•September 2020:Meeting with HBA-TC
•October 2020:Meeting with HBA-TC
•August 2021:Meeting with HBA-TC
•August 16,2022:Presentation to Development Outreach Group
•September 13,2022:Meeting with HBA-TC
•September 22,2022:Meeting with HBA-TC
•September 26,2022:Meeting with HBA-TC
•October 14,2022:Meeting with HBA-TC
•January-February 2023:Meetings with HBA-TC,City Council,Planning CommissionPage 212 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Sources: CPMC 14.90; ECC 15.420; WWMC 19.30’ BMC 16.40; KMC 22.28.070; SCSO 12.300.123)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
College Place, WA
Ellensburg, WA
Walla Walla, WA
Burlington, WA*
Kirkland, WA
Spokane County, WA
Pasco, WA
Kennewick, WA
Cle Elum, WA
Street Connectivity Comparisons:Page 213 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Proposed Facility Spacing Standards
Functional Classification Maximum Spacing
Principal Arterial 1 to 2 miles
Minor Arterial 1 mile
Collector ½ mile
Neighborhood Collector ¼ mile
Local Access Street/Bike + Ped
Facilities
660 feetPage 214 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Proposed Access Management Standards
Spacing Guidelines Principal
Arterials
Minor
Arterials Collectors Neighborhood
Collectors
Local
Access
Streets
Minimum Driveway
Spacing (Driveway to
Driveway)
300 feet 250 feet 150 feet 75 feet N/A
Minimum Full-Access
Driveway Spacing (Setback
from Intersection)300 feet 250 feet 150 feet 75 feet 25 feet
Minimum Right-In/Right-
Out Driveway Spacing
(Setback from Intersection)150 feet 125 feet 75 feet 50 feet 25 feetPage 215 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Proposed Street Connectivity Standards
Spacing Guidelines Principal
Arterials
Minor
Arterials Collectors Neighborhood
Collectors
Local
Access
Streets
Maximum Block Length
(for Public Access)660 feet 660 feet 660 feet 660 feet 660 feet
A pedestrian and bicycle accessway may be a substitute for a public street when
calculating block length,but in no case shall the distance between public streets exceed
990 feet.Page 216 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Page 217 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Page 218 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Street Connectivity (Code Amendment 2019-013)
Key Themes
•Access
•Connectivity
•Efficiency
•Mobility
•Multi-modal
•Safety
Benefits
•Addressing Community Input
•Implementation of Recommendations & Best Practices
•Compliance & Consistency
•Dependable development pattern
Impacts
•Regulations
•CostsPage 219 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Proposal Support
Page 220 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity“The proposed policy changes offer a significant improvement toward
creating a more walkable and transit friendly city.” Ben Franklin Transit
(06/15/2020)
“Visit Tri-Cities fully supports the City of Pasco’s effort to improve our
transportation system to incorporate the needs of all users.” Visit Tri-Cities
(06/16/2020)
“Pasco will be joining the ranks of leading cities across Washington
who are making smart decisions about their transportation systems
that will benefit their people for generations to come.” Washington State
Department of Transportation (10/12/2020)
“You may have just found a win-win for everyone” M. Heuer. Government Affairs
Committee, Tri-Cities Association of Realtors (11/17/2023)Page 221 of 226
“Dozens of local, state, and national
governments—including that of
Pasco, Washington, which we
recently profiled—are reforming
residential zoning that previously
permitted only detached single-family
dwellings.”
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (April 2022)
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Page 222 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Objective:Meet established Goals, Policies and Best Practices
◦Pasco City Council Goals (2010-Current)◦2011 Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (Resolution #3021)◦2018 Complete Streets Policy (Ordinance #4389)
◦2018 Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction (Resolution #3853)
◦2020-2021 Pasco City Council Goals (Resolution #3985)
◦2022-2023 Pasco City Council Goals (Resolution #4182)
◦2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance #4537)
◦Transportation System Master Plan (Resolution #4220)Page 223 of 226
CA2019-013 -Street Connectivity
Questions?Page 224 of 226
QUALITY OF LIFE
Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re- investment in community infrastructure including, but not limited to: • Completion of Transportation System Master Plan and design standard updates to promote greater neighborhood cohesion in new and re-developed neighborhoods through design elements, e.g.; connectivity, walkability, aesthetics, sustainability, and community gathering spaces. • Completion of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan and development of an implementation strategy to enhance such services equitably across the community. • Completion of the Housing Action and Implementation Plan with a focus on a variety of housing to address the needs of the growing population.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services and programs, including, but not limited to: • Adopting policies and strategic investment standards to assure consistency of long-range planning to include update of impact fees, area fees to specific infrastructure, and SEPA mitigation measures related to new development, e.g.; schools, traffic, parks, and fire.
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system including, but not limited to: • Application of the adopted Transportation System Master Plan including development of policies, regulations, programs, and projects that provide for greater connectivity, strategic investment, mobility, multi-modal systems, accessibility, efficiency, and safety.
COMMUNITY SAFETY
Promote proactive approaches for the strategic investment of infrastructure, staffing, and equipment including, but not limited to: • Adoption and develop implementation strategies for Comprehensive Fire Master Plan aimed at maintaining the current Washington State Rating Bureau Class 3 community rating. • Collaboration with regional partners to influence strategies to reduce incidences of homeless by leveraging existing resources such as the newly implemented 0.1% mental health sales tax, use of resource navigator programs, and other efforts. • Development of an implementation strategy for the Comprehensive Police Master Plan to support future service levels of the department to assure sustainability, public safety, officer safety, crime control, and compliance with legislative mandates.
ECONOMIC VITALITY
Promote and encourage economic vitality including, but not limited to: • Implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan through related actions including zoning code changes, phased sign code update, and development regulations and standards. • Completion of Area Master Plans and environmental analysis complementing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan such as Downtown and Broadmoor Master Plans. • Development of an Economic Development Plan, including revitalization efforts.
COMMUNITY IDENTITY
Identify opportunities to enhance community identity, cohesion, and image including, but not limited to: • Development of a Community Engagement Plan to evaluate strategies, technologies, and other opportunities to further inclusivity, community engagement, and inter-agency and constituent coordination efforts. • Support of the Arts and Culture Commission in promoting unity and the celebration of diversity through art and culture programs, recognition of significant events or occurrences, and participation/sponsorship of events within the community.
Page 225 of 226
CALIDAD DE VIDA
Promover una calidad de vida alta a través de programas de calidad, servicios, inversiones y reinversiones
apropiadas en la infraestructura de la comunidad incluyendo, pero no limitado a:
• Terminar el Plan de Transportación para promover más cohesión entre nuestras vecindades actuales y re-desarrolladas
a través de elementos de diseño, p.ej. conectividad, transitabilidad, sostenibilidad estética, y espacios para reuniones
comunitarias.
• Terminar el Plan de los Parques, la Recreación, y los Espacios Vacíos y el desarrollo de una estrategia de
implementación para mejorar tales servicios justamente a lo largo de la comunidad.
• Terminar el Plan de Acción e Implementación de Viviendas con un enfoque en una variedad de viviendas para tratar las
necesidades del aumento en la población.
SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA
Mejorar la viabilidad a largo plazo, el valor, y los niveles de los servicios y los programas, incluyendo, pero no
limitado a:
• Adoptar las políticas y los estándares de inversión estratégica para asegurar consistencia en la planificación a largo
plazo para incluir la actualización de las tarifas de impacto, las tarifas en áreas de infraestructura específica, y las
medidas de mitigación SEPA relacionadas con el nuevo desarrollo, p.ej. escuelas, tráfico, parques, e incendios.
RED DE TRANSPORTACION COMUNITARIA
Promover un sistema de transportación multimodal en alta operación incluyendo, pero no limitado a:
• Aplicar el Plan de Transportación que fue adoptado, incluyendo el desarrollo de las políticas, las reglas, los programas,
y los proyectos que proporcionan más conectividad, inversión estratégica, movilidad, sistemas multimodales,
accesibilidad, eficiencia, y seguridad.
SEGURIDAD COMUNITARIA
Promover métodos proactivos para la inversión estratégica en la infraestructura, el personal, y el equipo
incluyendo, pero no limitado a:
• Adoptar y desarrollar estrategias de implementación para el Plan Comprehensivo para Incendios. Con el propósito de
mantener la clasificación comunitaria actual en la tercera Clase del Departamento de Clasificación del Estado de
Washington.
• Colaborar con socios regionales para influenciar estrategias que reduzcan los incidentes de personas sin hogar al
hacer uso de los recursos actuales como el impuesto de ventas de 0.1% implementado recientemente para la salud
mental, el uso de programas para navegar los recursos, y otros esfuerzos.
• Desarrollar una estrategia de implementación para el Plan Comprehensivo de la Policía para apoyar los niveles futuros
de servicio del departamento para asegurar la sostenibilidad, la seguridad pública, la seguridad de los policías, el
control de crímenes, y el cumplimiento con los mandatos legislativos.
VITALIDAD ECONOMICA
Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica incluyendo, pero no limitado a:
• Implementar el Plan Comprehensivo del Uso de Terreno a través de acciones relacionadas, incluyendo cambios de los
códigos de zonificación, actualización en las etapas de los códigos de las señales, y el desarrollo de las reglas y los
estándares.
• Terminar los Planes de las Áreas y un análisis ambiental el cual complementa al plan integral de uso de la tierra como a
los Planes del Centro y de Broadmoor.
• Desarrollar un Plan de Desarrollo Económico, el cual incluya esfuerzos de revitalización.
IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA
Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la cohesión, y la imagen incluyendo, pero no
limitado a:
• Desarrollar un Plan de Participación de la Comunidad para evaluar las estrategias, las tecnologías, y otras
oportunidades para promover la inclusividad, la participación de la comunidad, y los esfuerzos interdepartamentales y de
coordinación de los constituyentes.
• Apoyar a la Comisión de las Artes y Cultura al promover la unidad y la celebración de la diversidad a través de
programas de arte y cultura, reconocer eventos o acontecimientos significantes, y participar/patrocinar eventos dentro
de la comunidad.
Page 226 of 226