HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023.10.02 Council Regular Meeting Packet
AGENDA
City Council Regular Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, October 2, 2023
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & GoToWebinar
Page
1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would
like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out
the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment) to
obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings
must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this meeting.
To listen to the meeting via phone, call (415) 655-0060 and use access code
307-404-066.
City Council meetings are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-
wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at
www.facebook.com/cityofPasco.
2. CALL TO ORDER
3. ROLL CALL
4. CONSENT AGENDA - All items listed under the Consent Agenda are
considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call
vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate
discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Councilmembers,
the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda
and considered separately.
6 - 16 (a) Approval of Meeting Minutes for September 18th and September
25th
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting and
Regular Workshop held on September 18, 2023 and September 25,
2023 respectively.
17 - 18 (b) Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total
Amount of $6,438,625.54.
Page 1 of 465
To approve claims in the total amount of $6,438,625.54 ($7,742.11 in
Check Nos. 54571 - 54581; $1,138,682.68 in Electronic Transfer Nos.
30196760 - 30197420; $4,946,179.91 in Check Nos. 258775 - 259094;
$346,020.84 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 842487 - 842517, 842540 -
842547, 842601, 842624 - 842647, 842705 - 842743, 842758 -
842811, 842813 - 842840, 842862 -- 842874, 842876 - 842889,
842905 - 842920, 842931 - 842935, 842938 - 842980, 842983 -
843050, 843060, 843062, 843065 - 843066, 843071 - 843080,
843096, 843100 - 843107).
19 - 375 (c) Ordinance No. 4685 & Resolution No. 4372 - Amending the Pasco
Munciipal Code Title 29 and approving the 2023 Shoreline Master
Program (PLAN 2013-001)
To adopt Ordinance No. 4685, amending the Pasco Municipal Code
Title 29 "Shoreline Regulations" related to the updated Shoreline
Master Program, and, further, authorize publication by summary only.
To approve Resolution No. 4375, adopting the 2023 Shorel ine Master
Program.
376 - 382 (d) Resolution No. 4374 - Project Acceptance for Animal Shelter
Frontage Improvements (18th And Washington) Project
To approve Resolution No. 4374, accepting work performed by Double
J. Inc., under contract for the Animal Shelter Frontage Improvements
(18th & Washington) Project.
383 - 391 (e) Resolution No. 4375, Washington State Recreation &
Conservation Office Local Parks Maintenance Grant Application
To approve Resolution No. 4375, submission of a grant application to
the Washington State Recreation & Conservation Office for park
maintenance funding.
(RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
392 - 394 (a) Proclaiming October 2023 as National Disability Employment
Awareness Month
Mayor Barajas will read the proclamation for "National Disability
Employment Awareness Month" scheduled for October 2023 and
present the proclamation to Anthony Contreras-Sanchez, Training and
TA Manager with the Washington Initiative for Supported Employment
(WISE).
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS - The public may address Council on any items unless
it relates to a scheduled Public Hearing. This item is provided to allow the
opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to express an
Page 2 of 465
opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for debate or for the
posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate response. Some
questions require consideration by Council over time and after a deliberative
process with input from a number of different sources; some questions are
best directed to staff members who have access to specific information.
Citizen comments will normally be limited to three minutes each by the Mayor.
Those with lengthy messages are invited to summarize their comments and/or
submit written information for consideration by the Council outside of formal
meetings.
7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS
(a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
395 - 417 (b) General Fund Monthly Report - August 2023
8. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO
9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS
418 - 438 (a) Ordinance No. 4686 & Resolution No. 4373 – Budget Amendment
& GSI Water Solutions, Inc. Agreement for the Pasco Aquifer
Storage and Recovery Feasibility Study Phase 2 Project
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4686, amending the 2023 -
2024 Biennial Operating Budget (Ordinance No. 4619) of the City of
Pasco, Washington, by providing a supplement thereto: to provide
additional appropriation in the City’s Water Utility Fund for the Aquifer
Storage and Recovery Feasibility Study – Phase 2 project and, further,
authorize publication by summary only.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4373, authorizing the
execution of the agreement with GSI Water Solutions, Inc. for the
Aquifer Storage and Recovery Feasibility Phase 2 project.
439 - 442 (b) Resolution No. 4376 - Approval of Department of Ecology State
Revolving Fund (SRF) Pre-Construction Funding Application for
Rivershore Sewer Interceptor Upsizing Phase 1 Project
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4376, authorizing the
submittal of the Department of Ecology Clean Water State Revolving
Fund Loan Application for the Rivershore Sewer Interceptor Upsizing,
Phase 1 project for an amount of up to $1,300,000.00.
443 - 452 (c) Resolution No. 4377 - Interlocal Agreement with Port of Pasco for
Promotion of Economic Development
Page 3 of 465
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4377, authorizing the City
Manager to sign and execute an Interlocal Agreement between the City
of Pasco and Port of Pasco for Promotion of Economic Development
in Pasco.
453 - 463 (d) *Resolution No. 4378 - Setting a Public Hearing Date to consider
a Right-of-Way Vacation at Road 76 & Chapel Hill Boulevard (VAC
2023-002)
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4378, setting 7:00 p.m.,
Monday, October 23rd, 2023, as the time and date for a public hearing
to consider the Right-of-Way Vacation at Road 76 and Chapel Hill
Boulevard, in Pasco, Washington.
10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
11. NEW BUSINESS
12. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION
13. EXECUTIVE SESSION
14. ADJOURNMENT
15. ADDITIONAL NOTES
(a) (RC) Roll Call Vote Required
* Item not previously discussed
Q Quasi-Judicial Matter
MF# “Master File #....”
464 - 465 (b) Adopted 2020-2021 Council Goals (Reference Only)
(c) REMINDERS
• Monday, October 2nd, 1:30 PM: Emergency Medical
Services Board Meeting – Fire Training Center, 1811 S. Ely,
Kennewick (COUNCILMEMBER PETE SERRANO, Rep.;
COUNCILMEMBER IRVING BROWN, Alt.)
• Monday, October 9th, 12:00 PM: Pasco Chamber of
Commerce Lunch Meeting, Pasco Red Lion, 2525 N. 20th
Ave, Pasco
• Monday, October 9th, 6:00 PM: Old Fireman’s Pension
Board Meeting – City Hall Conference Room 1, Pasco City
Hall (MAYOR BLANCHE BARAJAS, Rep.; MAYOR PRO TEM
CRAIG MALONEY, Alt.)
Page 4 of 465
This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the
Clerk for assistance.
Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor
avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la
disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter service may be
provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice
to the City Clerk to ensure availability.)
Page 5 of 465
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 27, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 10/2/23
FROM: Debra Barham, City Clerk
City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Meeting Minutes for September 18th and September 25th
I. REFERENCE(S):
09.18.2023 & 09.25.2023 Draft Council Minutes
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting and Regular
Workshop held on September 18, 2023 and September 25, 2023 respectively.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 6 of 465
MINUTES
City Council Regular Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, September 18, 2023
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & GoToWebinar
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Blanche Barajas, Mayor.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Blanche Barajas, Craig Maloney, Irving Brown, Joseph
Campos, David Milne, Zahra Roach, and Pete Serrano
Councilmembers absent: None
Staff present: Adam Lincoln, City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager;
Darcy Buckley, Finance Director; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; Kevin Crowley, Fire
Chief; Eric Ferguson, Jacob Gonzalez, Community & Economic Development
Director; City Attorney; Jesse Rice, Information Technology Director & Interim
Administrative & Community Services Director; Ken Roske, Police Chief; Steve
Worley, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Council adjourned into Executive Session at 7:02 PM for 10 minutes to discuss with
legal counsel about current or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) with the
City Manager, Deputy City Manager, and City Attorney.
At 7:14 PM Mayor Barajas announce d that the Executive Session would continue
for another 20 minutes.
At 7:34 PM Mayor Barajas announced that the Executive Session would continue
for another 10 minutes.
At 7:44 PM Mayor Barajas announced that the Executive Session would continue
for another 10 minutes.
Page 1 of 6Page 7 of 465
Mayor Barajas called the meeting back to order at 7:58 PM.
RECESS
Mayor Barajas called a five-minute recess at 7:58 PM.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Meeting Minutes for September 5th
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting held on
September 5, 2023.
Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of
$9,352,709.75.
To approve claims in the total amount of $9,352,709.75 ($11,653.38 in Check Nos.
54554 - 54570; $1,159,072.61 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30196071 - 30196759;
$8,113,272.87 in Check Nos. 258427 - 258774; $68,710.89 in Electronic Transfer
Nos. 842854).
Resolution No. 4371 – PWRF Improvements Ph 1 Utility Extension Project
Acceptance
To approve Resolution No. 4371, accepting work performed by Tapani Inc., of
Battle Ground, Washington, under contract for the Process Water Reuse Facility
Improvements - Phase 1 Utility Extension Project No. 19055.
MOTION: Councilmember Serrano moved, seconded by Councilmember Roach
to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney,
Councilmember Brown, Councilmember Campos,
Councilmember Milne, Councilmember Roach, and
Councilmember Serrano
DISCLOSURE OF EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM
Disclosure of Executive Session Item from January 2023
MOTION: Councilmember Serrano moved, seconded by Councilmember Milne
to disclose the contents of an Executive Session per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) on
January 17, 2023.
RESULT: Motion carried 6-1
Page 2 of 6Page 8 of 465
AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney,
Councilmember Brown, Councilmember Campos,
Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach
NAYS: Councilmember Serrano
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Thomas Granbois, downtown business owner and Pasco resident, commented recent
City events he attended. He also commented on the letter Council released from an
Executive Session and denounced racism.
Lawanda Hatch, Franklin County resident and Franklin C ounty Republican member,
denounced racism and expressed appreciation for Councilmember Brown.
Virginia Thomlinson, Pasco resident, commented on January 2023 Executive Session
where a letter was shared and she denounced racism.
Steven Bauman, Franklin County, asked for an explanation of what was discussed
during the Executive Session regarding the January 2023 Executive Session and
disclosure of the contents it.
Peter Harpster, Pasco resident, commented on community events in the past few
weeks. He thanked Mayor Pro Tem Maloney for his dedicated service.
Charles Grimm, Pasco resident, commented on the Fiery Foods Festival.
Kim Lehrman, Pasco resident, expressed appreciation to Jesse Rice for his vision for
the Fiery Foods Festival, as well as the pride Pasco has. She commented on Pasco
Police Department's gardening project.
REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS
Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
Mr. Serrano reported on a recent ribbon cutting event with Sound Audiology.
Mr. Milne commented on the Fiery Foods Festival and reported on the COPA he
recently attended.
Mr. Campos reported on the Ben Franklin Transit Board meeting he recently
attended.
Mr. Brown reported on the Benton Franklin Council of Governments meeting he
recently attended. He also commented on the Fiery Foods Festival.
Mayor Pro Tem Maloney commented on second annual Dinner in the Alley and
evening concert in downtown Pasco.
Page 3 of 6Page 9 of 465
Mayor Barajas, thanked Council for attending the Fiery Foods Festival. She
commented Hispanic Month proclamation.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS
Ordinance No. 4683 - Barker Heights Rezone from R-S-1 to R-3 (Z 2023-003)
Mayor Barajas announced that the proposed rezone was a quasi -judicial action and
asked Mr. Ferguson to explain the procedure for quasi-judicial items.
Mr. Ferguson read the quasi-judicial procedure including how the Appearance of
Fairness Doctrine applies to it. Next, he asked all Councilmembers a series of
questions associated with potential conflicts of interest to disclose such potential
conflicts or appearance of conflicts. With no response from the Councilmembers,
he asked if any members of the public were seeking to disqualify a member of
Council from participating in the proceedings. No one came forward.
Mr. Ferguson recommended that no additional comments be taken at this t ime as
the public hearing was held with the City's Hearing Examiner.
Mr. Gonzalez provided a brief report on the proposed rezone.
MOTION: Councilmember Serrano moved, seconded by Councilmember
Campos to adopt Ordinance No. 4683, amending the zoning classification of
certain real property located west of Broadmoor Boulevard near the intersection
of Iris Road, Pasco, Franklin County, Washingto n, from R-S-1 to R-3 and,
further, authorize publication by summary only.
RESULT: Motion carried. 6-1
AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney,
Councilmember Brown, Councilmember Campos,
Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach
NAYS: Councilmember Serrano
Ordinance No. 4684 - TSK 2009 LLC Rezone from R-4 to C-1 (Z 2023-004)
Mayor Barajas announced that the proposed rezone was a quasi -judicial action and
asked Mr. Ferguson to explain the procedure for quasi-judicial items.
Mr. Ferguson read the quasi-judicial procedure including how the Appearance of
Fairness Doctrine applies to it. Next, he asked all Councilmembers a series of
questions associated with potential conflicts of interest to disclose such potential
conflicts or appearance of conflicts. With no response from the Councilmembers,
he asked if any members of the public were seeking to disqualify a member of
Council from participating in the proceedings. No one came forward.
Mr. Ferguson recommended that no additional comments at this time as the public
hearing was held preciously by the City's Hearing Examiner.
Page 4 of 6Page 10 of 465
Mr. Gonzalez provided a brief report on the proposed rezone.
MOTION: Councilmember Serrano moved, seconded by Councilmember Roach
to adopt Ordinance No. 4684, amending the zoning classification of certain real
property located along the northwest corner of the intersection of Burns Road
and Broadmoor Boulevard, Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, from R-3 to C-
1 and further, authorize publication by summary only.
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney,
Councilmember Brown, Councilmember Campos,
Councilmember Milne, Councilmember Roach, and
Councilmember Serrano
Resolution No. 4372 - I-182 & Broadmoor Interchange Construction
Management PSA
Ms. Serra provided a brief report on the proposed Professional Services Agreement
for construction management of the I-182 and Broadmoor Interchange project.
MOTION: Councilmember Serrano moved, seconded by Councilmember
Campos to approve Resolution No. 4372, authorizing the City Manager to execute a
PSA with Atlas Consultant LLC., for construction management services for the I-182
and Broadmoor Interchange Improvement Project.
RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0
AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney,
Councilmember Brown, Councilmember Campos,
Councilmember Milne, Councilmember Roach, and
Councilmember Serrano
MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION
Mr. Gonzalez announced that the Planning Commission will be holding two public
hearings and hosting fourth Housing stakeholders meeting.
Mr. Rice provided a brief report on the recent Fiery Foods Festival. International Parking
Day event.
Pasco Chief Roske reported on the first graduation of the Basic Law Enforcement
Academy for 25 police officers, with four new police officers with the City. He expressed
thanks for Council and City support for the Basic Law Enforcement Academy.
Mayor Barajas announced on the Spanish speaking Citizens Police Academy
scheduled to start on September 26th.
Page 5 of 6Page 11 of 465
Ms. Roach commented on a resident who is trying to sell his house and is having a
difficult time selling it because of a neighboring nuisance property.
Mayor Pro Tem Maloney commented on "zombie properties" being discussed at the
State Legislature and requested staff find out the status of that topic.
Mayor Pro Tem Maloney asked for direction on how to share the contents of the
disclosure of the Executive Session item approved earlier in the meeting.
After Council discussion it was suggested that staff provide some talking points so that
Council may refer to them when discussing the matter.
Mayor Barajas announce that the applications for Council Position No . 6 is still open
and encouraged those individuals qualified to serve apply for this appointment.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:08 PM.
PASSED and APPROVED this ____ day of ________________, 20__.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Blanche Barajas, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 6 of 6Page 12 of 465
MINUTES
City Council Workshop Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, September 25, 2023
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & GoToWebinar
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Blanche Barajas, Mayor.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Blanche Barajas, Craig Maloney, Irving Brown, Joseph
Campos, David Milne, Zahra Roach, and Pete Serrano
Councilmembers absent: None
Staff present: Adam Lincoln, City Manager; Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager;
Darcy Buckley, Finance Director; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; Kevin Crowley, Fire
Chief; Eric Ferguson, Jacob Gonzalez, Community & Economic Development
Director; City Attorney; Jesse Rice, Information Technology Director & Interim
Administrative & Community Services Director; Ken Roske, Police Chief; Steve
Worley, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
Mr. Serrano, reported on the Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund Board meeting
he recently attended. He congratulated Councilmember Mr. Milne on his daughter for
entering the Marine Corps.
Mr. Campos announced the "Week without Driving" scheduled for O ctober 2 through
October 6, 2023 supported by Ben Franklin Transit Board.
Mayor Barajas commented on the recent formation of the Cowboy Council. She also
reported on meeting with the Pasco High School Girls Soccer Team earlier in the day.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
Page 1 of 4Page 13 of 465
Update – Eastern WA Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit Reissuance
Mr. Worley introduced Compliance Coordinator Henao, who provided a brief report
on the status of the Washington State Municipal Stormwater Permit for the City of
Pasco.
Mr. Serrano asked about lawn watering and pool water discharge, and expressed
concerns about a state agency dictating to local government.
Mayor Pro Tem Maloney echoed Mr. Serrano's concerns, as well as the tree
canopy.
Resolution - Basin Disposal Inc. 2024 Proposed Rate Increase
Mr. Worley provided a brief report related to the Basin Disposal, Inc. (BDI) proposed
2024 rate increase. He asked if Council work like to form a subcommittee to review
the proposed increases.
Ms. Roach, Mayor Barajas and Mr. Brown formed the BDI review subcommittee
and preference to include a remote meeting option.
Planning for Housing and Transportation
Mr. Gonzalez provided a brief report related to the development of the City's
Housing Action Plan and City transportation efforts, including mitigation and street
connectivity.
Mr. Serrano suggested pushing back on the State to slow down the population
growth in Pasco's city-limits to ensure that the infrastructure is built with available
funding.
Ms. Roach expressed appreciation for the community engagement opportunities
and staff's planning efforts for transportation. She commented on Pasco's growth
and the mitigation of transportation pain points within West Pasco.
Mayor Pro Tem Maloney also expressed appreciation to staff for their combined
efforts in planning for the future growth. He commented on impact fees for new
growth for all utilities and services so that growth will pay for growth. He
recommended that Council approve higher density housing though in-fill areas.
Lastly, he stated that Council and staff should be thoughtful when working with
Franklin County related to population growth.
Mr. Campos commented on a recent news article regarding property assessment
increases and suggested that higher density housing may be very helpful. He also
commented on being thoughtful during its population growth with both residential
and commercial facilities.
Mayor Barajas summarized Council's discussion.
Page 2 of 4Page 14 of 465
START TIME FOR OCTOBER 2, 2023 COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Barajas asked Council if the October 2nd Meeting should begin at 6:00 PM
due to the Council candidate interviews.
Mr. Ferguson asked that a motion be made by Council for the early start of next
week's meeting and that it will be posted as a special meeting due to the early start
time.
MOTION: Councilmember Roach moved, seconded by Councilmember Brown
to start the October 2, 2023 Council Meeting at 6:00 PM.
RESULT: Motion carried 6-1
AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney,
Councilmember Brown, Councilmember Campos,
Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach
NAYS: Councilmember Serrano
MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION
Mr. Campos announced that he will not be able to attend the October 2023 Good Roads
meeting and asked Mr. Serrano if he received the meeting invite.
Mr. Serrano stated that he did receive it and declined it; however, he would check his
schedule again to see if he may be able to attend it.
Mr. Brown asked about the public comments related to ADA accessibility issues made
in a previous meeting.
Ms. Roach asked about the results from a recent Parks and Recreation survey related
to ADA accessibility.
Mr. Lincoln provided a brief overview of the ADA needs in the City, specifically in the
City Parks.
Ms. Roach expressed appreciation to Mayor Pro Tem Maloney's service by providing a
series of examples of his many accomplishments during his tenure.
Mr. Campos expressed appreciation to Mayor Pro Tem Maloney's service on the
Council and wished him well.
Mr. Milne expressed appreciation to Mayor Pro Tem Maloney's service for Pasco as his
collogue and friend.
Mayor Barajas expressed appreciation to Mayor Pro Tem Maloney's service and
commitment to Pasco and Council.
Page 3 of 4Page 15 of 465
Mr. Brown stated that Mayor Pro Tem Maloney is blessed and he has coached and
mentored well during his tenure.
Mr. Serrano expressed appreciation to Mayor Pro Tem Maloney's service on Council
and his evolution as a community leader.
Mayor Pro Tem Maloney expressed thanks for the closing comments from Council,
noting that this job was never about him. Instead it was representing the City and
looking out for the best for the community.
RECESS
Mayor Barajas called a five-minute recess at 8:25 PM.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Council adjourned into Executive Session at 8:30 PM for 10 minutes to discuss
Discuss the qualifications of an applicant/candidate for appointment to elective
office per RCW 42.30.110(1)(h) with the City Manager and City Attorney.
Mayor Pro Tem Maloney left the Executive Session at 8:32 PM.
At 8:40 PM Mayor Barajas announced that the Executive Session would continue
for another 10 minutes.
Mayor Barajas called the meeting back to order at 8:51 PM.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:51 PM.
PASSED and APPROVED this __ day of ________________, 20__.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Blanche Barajas, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 4 of 4Page 16 of 465
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 28, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 10/2/23
FROM: Darcy Buckley, Finance Director
Finance
SUBJECT: Bills and Communications - Approving Claims in the Total Amount of
$6,438,625.54.
I. REFERENCE(S):
Accounts Payable 10.02.23
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve claims in the total amount of $6,438,625.54 ($7,742.11 in Check
Nos. 54571 - 54581; $1,138,682.68 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30196760 -
30197420; $4,946,179.91 in Check Nos. 258775 - 259094; $346,020.84 in
Electronic Transfer Nos. 842487 - 842517, 842540 - 842547, 842601, 842624 -
842647, 842705 - 842743, 842758 - 842811, 842813 - 842840, 842862 --
842874, 842876 - 842889, 842905 - 842920, 842931 - 842935, 842938 -
842980, 842983 - 843050, 843060, 843062, 843065 - 843066, 843071 - 843080,
843096, 843100 - 843107).
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 17 of 465
REPORTING PERIOD:
October 2, 2023
Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'l Bank Electronic Bank Combined
Check Numbers 258775 - 259094 54571 - 54581
Total Check Amount $4,946,179.91 $7,742.11 Total Checks 4,953,922.02$
Electronic Transfer Numbers 842487 - 842517 30196760 - 30197420
842540 - 842547
842601
842624 - 842647
842705 - 842743
842758 - 842811
842813 - 842840
842862 - 842874
842876 - 842889
842905 - 842920
842931 - 842935
842938 - 842980
842983 - 843050
843060 - 843062
843065 - 843066
843071 - 843080
843096
843100 - 843107
Total EFT Amount $346,020.84 $1,138,682.68 $0.00 Total EFTs 1,484,703.52$
Grand Total 6,438,625.54$
Councilmember
100 799,868.51
110 93,267.25
140 1,839.15
142 29.87
145 2,063.90
150 132,121.71
160 1,086.66
165 3,911.78
168 28,479.12
170 1,235.08
180 1,101.46
185 1,807.97
190 6,737.65
194 40,080.64
195 143.88
196 HOTEL/MOTEL EXCISE TAX 6,340.30
367 1,208,721.29
410 2,600,852.55
510 45,437.48
511 160.10
690 1,463,339.19
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS:6,438,625.54$
PAYROLL CLEARING
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING BUSINESS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER
GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
UTILITY, WATER/SEWER
RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN
REVOLVING ABATEMENT
CEMETERY
ATHLETIC PROGRAMS
ANIMAL CONTROL
SENIOR CENTER OPERATING
MULTI-MODAL FACILITY
C.D. BLOCK GRANT
HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT
MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER
AMBULANCE SERVICE
Councilmember
SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND:
GENERAL FUND
STREET
September 14 - September 27, 2023
C I T Y O F P A S C O
Council Meeting of:
Accounts Payable Approved
The City Council
City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington
We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as described
herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such claim.
Adam Lincoln, City Manager Griselda Garcia, Finance Manager
We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this
2nd day of October, 2023 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment:
Page 18 of 465
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 27, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager
City Council Regular
Meeting: 10/2/23
FROM: Jacob Gonzalez, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 4685 & Resolution No. 4372 - Amending the Pasco
Munciipal Code Title 29 and approving the 2023 Shoreline Master
Program (PLAN 2013-001)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Ordinance - Amending PMC Title 29 Shoreline Regulations
Resolution - Adopting the 2023 Shoreline Master Program
City of Pasco Draft Shoreline Master Program Update
Ecology Initial Determination of Consistency with Matrix
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4685, amending the Pasco Municipal
Code Title 29 "Shoreline Regulations" related to the updated Shoreline Master
Program, and, further, authorize publication by summary only.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4375, adopting the 2023 Shoreline
Master Program.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
shoreline for foundation the is The Act Management Shoreline (SMA)
management in Washington State. The SMA requi res each town, city, and
county to review, and, if necessary, revise its Shoreline Master Program (SMP)
every eight years per Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 90.58.80.
The City of Pasco (City) received a $28,000 Washington State Department of
Ecology (Ecology) grant to review and update the City’s SMP which agreement
was executed in May 2022.
Page 19 of 465
The City last updated their SMP in 2015. Now, in coordination with Ecology, the
City has completed the periodic review process to review and revise its SMP.
The periodic review addresses recent changes in SMA requirements, changes
for consistency with revised comprehensive plans and regulations, and any other
changes deemed necessary to reflect changed circumstances, new information,
or improved data (see attached: Draft Shoreline Master Program Update).
The SMA was ratified by state voters in 1972 and is codified in RCW 90.58. Its
overarching and uncoordinated caused harm by “to is purpose prevent
piecemeal development of the state’s major shorelines.” The SMA ap plies to all
shore lands and “Shorelines of the State” on waterbodies meeting size and flow
requirements as defined by the SMA (RCW 90.58.030).
The SMA requires all counties and most towns and cities in the state that have
shorelines to develop and implement SMPs. SMPs are approved at the local
level and by Ecology in an integrated approval process, consistent with the RCW
and the SMP guidelines provided in Washington Administrative Code (WAC)
127-26.
Public Workshops:
• January 3, 2023
• February 16, 2023
Public Hearings:
• April 20, 2023
• May 18, 2023
• June 14, 2023
Shoreline Master Programs are both planning and regulatory documents,
designed to carry out the policies of the Shoreline Management Act on local
shorelines. An SMP consists of a comprehensive use plan, use regulations,
maps, diagrams or other descriptive material, and a statement of desired goals
and standards. SMPs are based on state laws and rules and are tailored to local
geographic and environmental conditions and existing development patterns.
Per PMC 29.20, the SMP regulates the approval and issuance of development
permits agriculture, facilities, boating for within shoreline the jurisdiction
breakwater, jetties, groins, and weirs, commercial development, dredging and
dredge material disposal, fill and excavation, industrial development, in-stream
structures, development, mining, piers and docks, recreational residential
development, shoreline habitat and natural systems enhancement projects,
shoreline stabilization, transportation, trails, road s, and parking, and utilities.
Page 20 of 465
Over the last 20 years, the City has reviewed approximately 62 Shoreline
applications, most relating to permits for private dock placement or repairs. A
handful of agency (City of Pasco, Port of Pasco, Franklin County) projects, such
as levee lowering, bridge repairs or painting, are also in the mix, as well as a few
commercial/industrial permit applications.
V. DISCUSSION:
Ecology oversees the SMP periodic review process consistent with the SMA and
the applicable WAC administrative guidelines. Ecology must also formally
approve are jurisdictions amendments. Local approved locally the SMP
responsible for ensuring the SMP complies with local requirements and is
consistent with local plans, policies, and state law.
The City Planning Staff have been working with White Bluffs Consulting to
prepare consideration Planning the by for SMP 2015 the to changes
Commission, City Council, and Ecology.
Changes to the SMP were made in response to Washington State legislative
and agency (e.g., Department of Ecology, Office of Financial Management)
policy amendments (see attached May 18, 2023 PC Packet). The proposed
changes were made available to public agencies, NPOs, tribes, and the general
public via direct email, City of Pasco web posts, Ecology website posting, and
public notice during a 60-day comment period held between February 24th and
April 25th 2023; comments have been indexed and addressed by staff and
consultant in a Comment Response Matrix, and are attached to this Planning
Commission Staff Report packet (attached).
Comments from agencies and concerned citizens included a Pasco citizen
complaint regarding a possible SMP code violation and possible remediation
measures; Ecology recommendations to change the minimum buffer width and
to citizen Pasco various references; several tables update and
recommendations to modify verbiage, and add definitions; and several requests
from the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) to add
language regarding historic, cultural, and archaeological resources.
The Planning Commission held a Joint Public Hearing with the Washington State
Department of Ecology on April 20, 2023. A presentation was prepared for the
Planning Commission and the public summarizing the proposed changes.
Proposed changes are required to comply with changes in Federal and State
laws and regulations enacted since the 2015 update; these are relatively minor
edits to the existing SMP.
On July 13, 2023, the Washington State Department of Ecology issued an Initial
Determination of Consistency (see attached: Ecology Initial Determination of
Page 21 of 465
Consistency) for the City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program update which
included:
• Findings of Fact, which provided findings related to the City’s proposed
amendment, amendment history, and the review process; and
• Initial Determination of the proposed amendment with next steps.
Staff ProgShoreline the amended Master the and (attached) ram Draft
Ordinance Amending PMC Title 29 Shoreline Regulations (attached) to align
with the comments provided by the Washington State Department of Ecology;
with the amendments, the proposed Shoreline Master Program is in
conformance with the Washington State Department of Ecology’s goals for
Shoreline Master Programs.
On September 27, 2023, Ecology informed City staff that the project aimed at
developing a public user guide for the SMP has been granted funding as part of
the 2023-2025 Shoreline Planning Competitive Grant Program. This funding will
play a crucial role in facilitating the creation of Pasco's inaugural User Guide for
SMP-related activities, thereby advancing the department's initiatives to actively
involve community members and businesses.
Page 22 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 1
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING PASCO MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 29 SHORELINE
REGULATIONS RELATED TO THE UPDATED SHORELINE MASTER
PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) is the foundation for shoreline
management in Washington State; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the SMA is to manage the shoreline to accommodate all
reasonable and appropriate uses consistent with protecting against adverse effects to the public
health, the land and its vegetation and wildlife; and
WHEREAS, the SMA requires each town, city, and county to review, and, if necessary,
revise its Shoreline Master Program (SMP) every eight years per Revised Code of Washington
(RCW) 90.58.80; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) SMP is a planning document that outlines the City's
shoreline goals and establishes regulations for development to ensure that all land use,
development, or other activity occurring within the designated shoreline jurisdiction is appropriate
for that area; and
WHEREAS, the City is required to complete an update of the existing SMP that is
consistent with procedural and substantive requirements of the SMA governed by RCW 90.58 and
WAC 173-26; and
WHEREAS, the City last updated their SMP in June, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the City entered into a grant contract with the Washington State Department
of Ecology effective May 10, 2022, to update and amend its Shoreline Master Program consistent
with the Shoreline Management Act and Shoreline Master Program Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City is completing the periodic review process to review and revise its
SMP on or before June 30, 2023, in coordination with the Washington State Department of
Ecology (Ecology); and
WHEREAS, the periodic review addresses recent changes in SMA requirements, changes
for consistency with revised comprehensive plans and regulations, and any other changes deemed
necessary to reflect changed circumstances, new information, or improved data; and
WHEREAS, the proposed changes were made available to public agencies, NGOs, tribes,
and the general public via direct email, City of Pasco web posts, Ecology website posting, and
public notice during a 30-day joint comment period from March 26 to April 25, 2023; and a 60-
day comment period was also held between February 24 and April 25, 2023; and
Page 23 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 2
WHEREAS, comments have been indexed and addressed by staff and consultant as part
of the SMP update process; and
WHEREAS, on March 22, 2023, a Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendments 30-day
comment period and Joint Public Hearing notice and SEPA Checklist were sent to the agencies for
review (March 26, 2023 to April 25, 2023); and
WHEREAS, on April 20, 2023, the Planning Commission held a Joint Public Hearing
with the Washington State Department of Ecology to accept public testimony on the proposed
Shoreline Master Program Update, and that meeting was duly recorded; and
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2023, the Planning Commission held a Public Meeting to
recommend the Shoreline Master Program report and ancillary documents be sent on to the
Washington State Department of Ecology for preliminary review, and that meeting was duly
recorded; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend to the
City Council approval of the Shoreline Master Plan Update; and
WHEREAS, the Update provides a document that outlines the City's amended shoreline
goals and regulations for development now and in the future; and
WHEREAS, the Update achieves the goals and requirements of the Shoreline
Management Act (RCW 90.58); and
WHEREAS, the proposal was reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act and a
Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposed Shoreline Master Program Update
on June 16, 2023; and
WHEREAS, on July 13, 2023, the Washington State Department of Ecology issued an
Initial Determination of Consistency for the City of Pasco SMP update which included Findings
of Fact, which provides findings related to the City’s proposed amendment, amendment history,
and the review process; and Initial Determination of the proposed amendment with next steps; and
WHEREAS, Staff amended the SMP to align with the comment provided by the
Washington State Department of Ecology; and
WHEREAS, the proposed SMP is in alignment with required and suggested amendments
provided by the Washington State Department of Ecology’s Initial Determination of Consistency;
and
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council held a public meeting on the proposed Update on July
17, 2023, at its regularly scheduled Council meeting; and
Page 24 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 3
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council accepted the recommendation of the City of Pasco
Planning Commission at its public meeting on September 5, 2023; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Shoreline Master Program Update is hereby amended as shown in
Exhibit “A” as a Shoreline Planning guide and supplement to the Comprehensive Plan;
Section 2. That Title 29 entitled “Shoreline Regulations” of the Pasco Municipal Code
is hereby amended and shall read as follows:
Title 29
SHORELINE REGULATIONS
Chapters:
29.05 Authority and Purpose.
29.10 Environment Designation.
29.15 General Regulations.
29.20 Shoreline Modifications and Use Regulations.
29.25 Critical Areas.
29.30 Existing Uses, Structures, and Lots.
29.35 Administration and Enforcement.
Chapter 29.05
AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE
Sections:
29.05.010 Authority.
29.05.020 Applicability.
29.05.030 Purpose.
29.05.040 Relationship to other codes, ordinances, and plans.
29.05.050 Liberal construction.
29.05.060 Effective date.
29.05.070 Definitions.
29.05.010 Authority.
(1) The Shoreline Management Act (SMA) of 1971, Chapter 90.58 RCW, is the authority for
the enactment and administration of this Shoreline Master Program (SMP).
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.010.]
Page 25 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 4
29.05.020 Applicability.
(1) This SMP applies to all development, the construction or exterior alteration of structures;
dredging; drilling; dumping; filling; removal of any sand, gravel, minerals or vegetation;
bulkheading; driving of piling; placing of obstructions; or any project of a permanent or temporary
nature which interferes with the normal public use of the surface of the waters of the state subject
to Chapter 90.58 RCW at any stage of water level. The following activities do not meet the
definition of development:
(a) Interior building improvements;
(b) Routine landscape maintenance of established, ornamental landscaping, such as
lawn mowing, pruning and weeding;
(c) Routine cleaning of the following existing facilities that does not expand the
affected area: septic tanks, wells, and individual utility service connections;
(d) Dismantling or removing structures if there is no other associated development or
redevelopment;
(e) Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any person conducting a remedial action at a facility
pursuant to a consent decree, order, or agreed order issued pursuant to RCW 70A.305, or
to Ecology when it conducts a remedial action under RCW 70A.305;
(f) Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any person installing site improvements for storm
water treatment in an existing boatyard facility to meet requirements of a national pollutant
discharge elimination system storm water general permit;
(g) Washington State Department of Transportation projects and activities meeting the
conditions of RCW 90.58.356;
(h) Projects consistent with an environmental excellence program agreement pursuant
to RCW 90.58.045 and RCW 43.21K;
(i) Projects authorized through the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council process,
pursuant to RCW 80.50; and
(j) Areas and uses in those areas that are under exclusive federal jurisdiction as
established through federal or state statutes are not subject to the jurisdiction of RCW
90.58.
(1)(2) This SMP shall apply to all of the shoreline areas, waters, and critical areas within the
shoreline jurisdiction of the City as described in SMP Section I, Shoreline Goals and Policies,
Profile of the Shoreline Jurisdiction, within the City limits of the City of Pasco.
Page 26 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 5
(2)(3) All proposed uses, activities, or development occurring within shoreline jurisdiction must
conform to the intent and requirements of Chapter 90.58 RCW, the SMA, and this SMP whether
or not a permit or other form of authorization is required. See SMP Shoreline Goals and Policies
section for the shoreline jurisdiction description and Chapter 29.35 PMC for the definition of uses,
activities, and development.
(3)(4) The SMP applies to shoreline jurisdiction within the City limits; this SMP will not apply
to shorelines in the urban growth areas (UGAs) until the annexation of the UGA to the City is
finalized.
(4)(5) Pursuant to WAC 173-27-060, federal agency activities may be required by other federal
laws to meet the permitting requirements of Chapter 90.58 RCW. This SMP shall apply to all
nonfederal developments and uses undertaken on federal lands and on lands subject to nonfederal
ownership, lease, or easement, even though such lands may fall within the external boundaries of
federal ownership.
(5)(6) As recognized by RCW 90.58.350, the provisions of this SMP shall not affect treaty rights
of Native American tribes.
(6)(7) Maps indicating the extent of shoreline jurisdiction and shoreline designations are guidance
only. They are to be used in conjunction with the most current scientific and technical information
available, field investigations, and on-site surveys to accurately establish the location and extent
of shoreline jurisdiction when a project is proposed. All areas meeting the definition of a shoreline
of the state or a Shoreline of Statewide Significance, whether mapped or not, are subject to the
provisions of this SMP.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.020.]
29.05.030 Purpose.
The purposes of this SMP are:
(1) To promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the City by providing
comprehensive policies and effective, reasonable regulations for development, use, and protection
of jurisdictional shorelines;
(2) To further assume and carry out the local government responsibilities established by the
SMA in RCW 90.58.050, including planning and administering the regulatory program consistent
with the policy and provisions of the SMA in RCW 90.58.020;
(3) To provide a high-quality shoreline environment where:
(a) Recreational opportunities are abundant;
(b) The public enjoys access to and views of shoreline areas;
Page 27 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 6
(c) Natural systems are preserved, restored, or enhanced;
(d) Ecological functions of the shoreline are maintained and improved over time;
(e) Water-oriented uses are promoted consistent with the shoreline character and
environmental functions; and
(4) To apply special conditions to those uses that are not consistent with the control of pollution
and prevention of damage to the natural environment, or that are not unique to or dependent on
use of the state’s shoreline; and
(5) To ensure no net loss of ecological functions associated with the shoreline.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.030.]
29.05.040 Relationship to other codes, ordinances, and plans.
(1) All applicable federal, state, and local laws shall apply to properties in the shoreline
jurisdiction. Where this SMP makes reference to any RCW, WAC, or other state or federal law or
regulation, the most recent amendment or current edition shall apply.
(2) In the event provisions of this SMP conflict with provisions of federal, state, or city
regulations, the provision that is most protective of shoreline resources shall prevail. It is
understood that the provisions of this SMP may not allow development to occur at what otherwise
might be the property’s full zoning potential.
(a) Local plans or programs include, but are not limited to:
(i) Chapter 24.20 PMC, Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection;
(ii) PMC Title 23, Environmental Impact;
(iii) PMC Title 25, Zoning.
(b) State and federal programs include, but are not limited to:
(i) Washington State Hydraulic Project Permits (HPA);
(ii) Washington State Pesticide Applicator License Requirements;
(iii) Washington State Waste Discharge Permits;
(iv) Washington State Water Quality Certification Requirements (401);
(v) USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers) 404 Permits and Section 10
Permits.
Page 28 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 7
(3) The policies in the SMP, contained in the SMP elements, state those underlying objectives
that the regulations are intended to accomplish. The policies guide the interpretation and
enforcement of the SMP regulations contained in this title. The policies are not regulations in
themselves and, therefore, do not impose requirements beyond those set forth in the regulations.
(4) This SMP contains critical area regulations in Chapter 29.25 PMC, applicable only in
shoreline jurisdictions that provide a level of protection to critical areas assuring no net loss of
shoreline ecological functions necessary to sustain shoreline natural resources (RCW 36.70A.480).
In the event of a conflict between the requirements of this title and any other code or ordinance of
the City, the regulation that provides the greater protection for the particular critical area within
shoreline jurisdiction shall apply.
(5) Projects in the shoreline jurisdiction that have either been deemed technically complete
through the application process or have been approved through local and state reviews prior to the
adoption of this SMP are considered accepted. Major changes or new phases of projects that were
not included in the originally approved plan will be subject to the policies and regulations of this
SMP.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.040.]
29.05.050 Liberal construction.
(1) According to RCW 90.58.900, SMA is exempted from the rule of strict construction, and
it shall be liberally construed to give full effect to the objectives and purposes for which it was
enacted. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.050.]
29.05.060 Effective date.
(1) The SMP is hereby adopted on September 19, 2016 September 18, 2023. This SMP and all
amendments thereto shall become effective 14 days after final approval and adoption by the
Department of Ecology. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.070.]
29.05.070 Definitions.
“Act” means the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA), Chapter 90.58 RCW.
“Active fault” means a fault that is considered likely to undergo renewed movement within a
period of concern to humans. Faults are commonly considered to be active if the fault has moved
one or more times in the last 10,000 years.
“Additions” means improvements to an existing building or structure, the cost of which does not
exceed 50 percent of the assessed value of the total structure or result in an increase greater than
25 percent of the building footprint (up to a maximum of 500 square feet) before the addition is
started. Additions must share a common wall (one full side) with the original structure.
Page 29 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 8
“Adjacent,” for purposes of applying Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas, means immediately
adjoining (in contact with the boundary of the influence area) or within a distance less than that
needed to separate activities from critical areas to ensure protection of the functions and values of
the critical areas. Adjacent shall mean any activity or development located:
(a) On site immediately adjoining a critical area; or
(b) A distance equal to or less than the required critical area buffer width and building
setback.
“Agricultural activities” means agricultural uses and practices, including but not limited to:
producing, breeding, or increasing agricultural products; rotating and changing agricultural crops;
allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie fallow, in which it is plowed and tilled but left
unseeded; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant as a result of adverse
agricultural market conditions; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant because
the land is enrolled in a local, state, or federal conservation program, or the land is subject to a
conservation easement; conducting agricultural operations; maintaining, repairing, and replacing
agricultural equipment; maintaining, repairing, and replacing agricultural facilities; provided, that
the replacement facility is no closer to the shoreline than the original facility; and maintaining
agricultural lands under production or cultivation. Also see definition of “New agricultural
activities” below.
“Agricultural equipment” includes, but is not limited to, the following used in agricultural
operations:
(a) Equipment; machinery; constructed shelters, buildings, and ponds; fences; upland
finfish rearing facilities; water diversion, withdrawal, conveyance, and use equipment and
facilities including, but not limited to, pumps, pipes, taps, canals, ditches, and drains;
(b) Corridors and facilities for transporting personnel, livestock, and equipment to,
from, and within agricultural lands;
(c) Farm residences and associated equipment, lands, and facilities; and
(d) Roadside stands and on-farm markets for marketing fruit or vegetables.
Agricultural facilities. See “Agricultural equipment.”
“Agricultural land” means those specific land areas on which agriculture activities are conducted
as of the date of adoption of a local Shoreline Master Program (SMP) pursuant to these guidelines
as evidenced by aerial photography or other documentation. After the effective date of the SMP,
land converted to agricultural use is subject to compliance with the requirements of the SMP.
“Agricultural products” includes but is not limited to horticultural, viticultural, floricultural, and
vegetable, fruit, berry, grain, hops, hay, straw, turf, sod, seed, and apiary products; feed or forage
for livestock; Christmas trees; hybrid cottonwood and similar hardwood trees grown as crops and
Page 30 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 9
harvested within 20 years of planting; and livestock, including both the animals themselves and
animal products, including but not limited to meat, upland finfish, poultry and poultry products,
and dairy products.
“Alteration,” for purposes of applying Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas, means any human-
induced change in an existing condition of a critical area or its buffer. Alterations include grading,
filling, dredging, channelizing, clearing (vegetation), applying pesticides, discharging waste,
construction, compaction, excavation, modifying for storm water management, relocating, or other
activities that change the existing landform, vegetation, hydrology, wildlife, or habitat value of
critical areas.
“Amendment” means a revision, update, addition, deletion, and/or reenactment to an existing
SMP.
“Applicant” means a person who files an application for a permit under this SMP and who is either
the owner of the land on which that proposed activity would be located, a contract purchaser, or
the authorized agent of such person.
“Approval” means an official action by a local government legislative body agreeing to submit a
proposed SMP or amendments to Washington State Department of Ecology for review and official
action pursuant to this SMP or an official action by Washington State Department of Ecology to
make a local government SMP effective, thereby incorporating the approved SMP or amendment
into the SMP.
“Aquaculture” means the culture or farming of fish or other aquatic plants and animals.
“Aquifer recharge area” means an area through which precipitation and surface water infiltrate the
soil and are transmitted through rocks and soil to create groundwater storage. They are also areas
where an aquifer that is a source of drinking water is vulnerable to contamination that would affect
the potability of water.
“Area of influence” encompasses an area that is two and one-half times the height of a slope. The
area of influence applies to areas that have geologically hazardous attributes consistent with an
“erosion” or “landslide hazard area” as defined in this section, and PMC 29.25.070, Geological
hazard areas. This mapped area surrounds the hazard area from all points for a distance of two and
one-half times the height of the applicable slope. An area with a 15 percent slope or greater as its
only attribute does not have an area of influence.
“Area of shallow flooding” means a designated AO or AH zone on the Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM). AO is characterized as sheet flow and AH indicates ponding. The base flood depths range
from one to three feet; a clearly defined channel does not exist; the path of flooding is unpredictable
and indeterminate; and velocity flow may be evident.
“Area of special flood hazard” means the land in the floodplain within a community subject to a
one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. Designation on maps always includes
the letters A or V.
Page 31 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 10
“Assessed value” means assessed valuation shall be as established by the County assessor’s office,
unless otherwise provided by a market appraisal institute appraisal.
“Associated wetlands” are those wetlands that are in proximity to and either influence or are
influenced by a stream subject to the SMA.
“Average grade level” means the average of the natural or existing topography of the portion of
the lot, parcel, or tract of real property that will be directly under the proposed building or structure.
In the case of structures to be built over water, average grade level shall be the elevation of the
ordinary high water mark (OHWM). Calculation of the average grade level shall be made by
averaging the ground elevations at the midpoint of all exterior walls of the proposed building or
structure.
“Base flood” means a flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given
year. Also referred to as the “100-year flood.” Designated on FIRM with the letters A or V.
“Base flood elevation” means the water surface elevation of the base flood. It shall be referenced
to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988.
“Basement” means any area of a building having its floor subgrade (below ground level) on all
sides.
“Best management practices (BMPs)” means conservation practices or systems of practice and
management measures that:
(a) Control soil loss and reduce water quality degradation caused by high
concentrations of nutrients, animal waste, toxics, and sediment;
(b) Minimize adverse impacts on surface water and groundwater flow and circulation
patterns, and the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of wetlands;
(c) Protect trees and vegetation designated to be retained during and following site
construction; and
(d) Provide standards for proper use of chemical herbicides within critical areas.
“Best management practices, agricultural” means systems of practices, schedules of activities,
prohibitions, maintenance procedures, and management measures that prevent or minimize
adverse impacts to the environment. Such practices may be subject to varying conditions, which
include geographical location, weather, soil or mineral types and conditions, type of crop or
livestock, type of mining, and management systems. Generally accepted agricultural BMPs
include those practices historically carried out in the region and those practices defined by the
State of Washington, Department of Agriculture, recommendations by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, and other professional and industry agricultural organizations.
Page 32 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 11
“Boating facilities” allowed in the City include boat launches and upland boat storage, marinas,
and other boat moorage structures or uses. For the purposes of this SMP, boating facilities excludes
docks serving four or fewer single-family residences.
“Breakwater” means an offshore structure whose primary purpose is to protect harbors, moorages,
and navigation activity from wave and wind action by creating stillwater areas along shore. A
secondary purpose is to protect shorelines from wave-caused erosion. Breakwaters are generally
built parallel to shore, may or may not be connected to land, and may be floating or stationary.
“Buffer, critical areas,” means an area which provides the margin of safety through protection of
slope stability, attenuation of surface water flows and landslide hazards reasonably necessary to
minimize risk to the public from loss of life or well-being or property damage resulting from
natural disasters, or an area which is an integral part of a stream or wetland ecosystem and which
provides shading, input of organic debris and coarse sediments, room for variation in stream or
wetland boundaries, habitat for wildlife and protection from harmful intrusion necessary to protect
the public from losses suffered when the functions and values of aquatic resources are degraded.
“Building setback line” means a line beyond which the foundation of a structure shall not extend.
“City” means the City of Pasco.
“Clearing” means the cutting, killing, grubbing, or removing of vegetation or other organic
material by physical, mechanical, chemical, or any other similar means.
“Cluster” means a group of three or more significant trees with overlapping or touching crowns.
“Community access” means a shoreline access available to a group or community (e.g.,
homeowners association), which may not be accessible to general public.
“Compensation project” means actions specifically designed to replace project induced critical
area and buffer losses. Compensation project design elements may include land acquisition,
planning, construction plans, monitoring, and contingency actions.
“Compensatory mitigation” means types of mitigation used to replace project-induced critical
areas and buffer losses or impacts.
“Critical aquifer recharge area” means those areas that are:
(a) Designated as wellhead protection areas pursuant to the WAC 246-290-135(4) and
the groundwater contribution area in WAC 246-291-100(2)(e). Wellhead protection areas
shall, for the purpose of this regulation, include the identified recharge areas associated
with either Group A public water supply wells and those Group B wells with a wellhead
protection plan filed with the Franklin County Health District; and
(b) Identified in the Soil Survey of Pasco as having high potential for aquifer recharge,
including those soil types identified by the Shoreline Administrator.
Page 33 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 12
“Crown” means the area of a tree containing leaf- or needle-bearing branches.
“Cultural and historic resources” means buildings, sites and areas having archaeological, historic,
cultural, or scientific value or significance.
“Designated floodway” means the regulatory floodway that has been delineated on the City’s
FIRM.
“Developable area” means a site or portion of a site that may be utilized as the location of
development, in accordance with the rules of this SMP.
“Development” means a use consisting of: the construction or exterior alteration of structures;
dredging; drilling; dumping; filling; removal of any sand, gravel, or minerals; bulkheading; driving
of piling; placing of obstructions; or any project of a permanent or temporary nature, which
interferes with the normal public use of the surface of the waters overlying lands subject to the
SMA at any stage of water level. “Development” does not include dismantling or removing
structures if there is no other associated development or re-development.
“Development permit” means any permit issued by the City or other authorized agency for
construction, land use, or the alteration of land.
“Dock” means, as a general term, a structure or group of structures that provides boat moorage or
other uses. A dock may be made up of piers (which are structures on fixed piles) and floats (which
float on the water’s surface and are typically attached to piles so that they may rise and fall with
changes in the water’s elevation).
“Dredging” means the removal of sediments from the bed of a water body by mechanical means.
“Ecological functions” or “shoreline functions” means the work performed or role played by the
physical, chemical, and biological processes that contribute to the maintenance of the aquatic and
terrestrial environments that constitute the shoreline’s natural ecosystem.
“Ecosystem-wide processes” means the suite of naturally occurring physical and geologic
processes of erosion, transport, and deposition, and specific chemical processes that shape
landforms within a specific shoreline ecosystem and determine the types of habitat and the
associated ecological functions.
“Erosion” means the detachment and movement of soil or rock by water, wind, ice, or gravity.
“Erosion hazard area” means those areas that, because of natural characteristics, including
vegetative cover, soil texture, slope gradient, rainfall patterns, or human-induced changes to such
characteristics, are vulnerable to erosion.
“Feasible” means, for the purpose of this SMP, that an action, such as a development project,
mitigation, or preservation requirement, meets all of the following conditions:
Page 34 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 13
(a) the action can be accomplished with technologies and methods that have been used
in the past in similar circumstances, or studies or tests have demonstrated in similar
circumstances that such approaches are currently available and likely to achieve the
intended results;
(b) the action provides a reasonable likelihood of achieving its intended purpose; and
(c) the action does not physically preclude achieving the project’s primary intended
legal use. In cases where these guidelines require certain actions unless they are infeasible,
the burden of proving infeasibility is on the applicant. In determining an action’s
infeasibility, the reviewing agency may weigh the action’s relative public costs and public
benefits, considered in the short- and long-term time frames.
“Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)” means the agency that oversees the
administration of the National Flood Insurance Program (44 CFR).
“Fill” means the addition of soil, sand, rock, gravel, sediment, earth retaining structure, or other
material to an area waterward of the OHWM, in wetlands or on shoreline areas in a manner that
raises the elevation or creates dry land.
“Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas” means areas necessary for maintaining species in
suitable habitats within their natural geographic distribution so that isolated subpopulations are not
created as designated by WAC 365-190-080(5). These areas include:
(a) Areas within which state and federal endangered and threatened species exist, or
state sensitive, candidate, and monitor species have a primary association;
(b) Priority habitat and species areas identified by the Washington Department of Fish
and Wildlife (WDFW);
(c) Habitats and species of local importance that have been designated by the City at
the time of application;
(d) Naturally occurring ponds less than 20 acres and their submerged aquatic beds that
provide fish or wildlife habitat. These do not include ponds deliberately designed and
created from dry sites such as canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities,
farm ponds, temporary construction ponds of less than three years’ duration, and landscape
amenities. Naturally occurring ponds may include those artificial ponds intentionally
created from dry areas in order to mitigate conversion of ponds, if permitted by a regulatory
authority;
(e) Waters of the state as defined by Chapter 222-16 WAC;
(f) Lakes, ponds, streams, and rivers planted with game fish by a governmental or
tribal entity;
Page 35 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 14
(g) Areas with which anadromous fish species have a primary association; and
(h) State natural area preserves and natural resources conservation areas.
“Flood” or “flooding” mean a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation
of normally dry land areas from the overflow of inland waters and/or the unusual and rapid
accumulation of runoff or surface waters from any source.
“Flood hazard area” means any area subject to inundation by the base flood or risk from channel
migration, including, but not limited to, an aquatic area, wetland, or closed depression.
“Flood insurance rate map (FIRM)" means the official map on which the Federal Insurance
Administration has delineated both the areas of special flood hazards and the risk premium zones
applicable to the City.
“Flood insurance study” means the official report provided by the Federal Insurance and
Mitigation Administration that includes the flood profiles, the FIRM, and the water surface
elevation of the base flood (44 CFR Part 59).
“Flood protection elevation” means an elevation that is one foot or more above the base flood
elevation.
“Floodplain” is synonymous with 100-year floodplain and means that land area susceptible to
inundation with a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The limit of
this area shall be based on flood ordinance regulation maps or a reasonable method which meets
the objectives of the SMA.
“Floodproofing” means adaptations that ensure a structure is substantially resistant to the passage
of water below the flood protection elevation and resists hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and
effects of buoyancy.
“Floodway” means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas through
which the base flood is discharged. Floodways identified on flood boundary and floodway maps
become “regulatory floodways” within which encroachment or obstructions are prohibited.
“Floodway dependent structure,” for purposes of applying Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas,
means structures such as, but not limited to, dams, levees, pump stations, stream bank stabilization,
boat launches and related recreational structures, bridge piers and abutments, and fisheries
enhancement or stream restoration projects.
“Floodway” means the area, as identified in a master program, that has been established in a federal
emergency management agency flood insurance rate maps or floodway maps.
“Functions” and “values,” for purposes of applying Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas, mean the
beneficial roles served by critical areas, including, but not limited to, water quality protection and
enhancement, fish and wildlife habitat, food chain support, flood storage, conveyance and
Page 36 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 15
attenuation, groundwater recharge and discharge, erosion control, and recreation. Functions and
values may be considered independently, with functions being measured indicators such as water
quality, hydrologic functions, and habitat functions; and values being nonmeasured indicators such
as local importance, potential qualities, or recreational benefits.
“Geological hazard areas” means areas that, because of their susceptibility to erosion, sliding,
earthquake, or other geologic events, are not suited to the siting of commercial, residential, or
industrial development consistent with public health or safety concerns. Geological hazard areas
include erosion hazards, landslide hazards, mine hazards, and seismic hazards, as defined herein
and specified in PMC 29.25.070.
“Geotechnical report” or “geotechnical analysis” means a scientific study or evaluation conducted
by a qualified expert that includes a description of the ground and surface hydrology and geology,
the affected landform and its susceptibility to mass wasting, erosion, and other geologic hazards
or processes, conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of the proposed development
on geologic conditions, the adequacy of the site to be developed, the impacts of the proposed
development, alternative approaches to the proposed development, and measures to mitigate
potential site-specific and cumulative geological and hydrological impacts of the proposed
development, including the potential adverse impacts on adjacent and down-current properties.
Geotechnical reports shall conform to accepted technical standards and must be prepared by
qualified professional engineers or geologists who have professional expertise about the regional
and local shoreline geology and processes.
“Grading” means stripping, cutting, filling, or stockpiling of land, including the land in its cut or
filled condition to create new grade.
“Groin” means a barrier type of structure extending from the stream bank into a water body for
the purpose of the protection of a shoreline and adjacent uplands by influencing the movement of
water or deposition of materials.
“Ground cover” means all types of vegetation other than trees.
“Guidelines” means those standards adopted by the department to implement the policy of Chapter
90.58 RCW for regulation of use of the shorelines of the state prior to adoption of SMPs. Such
standards shall also provide criteria for local governments and the department in developing and
amending SMPs.
“Hazard areas” means areas designated as frequently flooded or geologically hazardous areas due
to potential for erosion, landslide, seismic activity, mine collapse, or other geologically hazardous
conditions, including steep slopes.
“Hazardous substance(s)” means:
(a) A hazardous substance as defined by Section 101(14) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; any substance designated
pursuant to Section 311(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Water Act (CWA); any hazardous waste
Page 37 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 16
having the characteristics identified under or listed pursuant to Section 3001 of the Solid
Waste Disposal Act (but not including any waste the regulation of which under the Solid
Waste Disposal Act has been suspended by Act of Congress); any toxic pollutant listed
under Section 307(a) of the CWA; or any imminently hazardous chemical substance or
mixture with respect to which the United States Environmental Protection Agency has
taken action pursuant to Section 7 of the Toxic Substances Control Act; and
(b) Hazardous substances that include any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any
material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibit any
of the physical, chemical, or biological properties described in WAC 173-303-090, 173-
303-102, or 173-303-103.
“Heavy equipment” means such construction machinery as backhoes, treaded tractors, dump
trucks, and front-end loaders.
“High-intensity land use” means land uses consisting of commercial, urban, industrial,
institutional, retail, residential with more than one unit per acre, agricultural (dairies, nurseries,
raising and harvesting crops, requiring annual tilling, and raising and maintaining animals), high-
intensity recreation (golf courses, ball fields), and hobby farms.
“Hydraulic project approval (HPA)” means a permit issued by WDFW for modification to waters
of the state in accordance with Chapter 75.20 RCW.
“Impervious surface area” means a hard surface area, which either prevents or retards the entry of
water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. Impervious surface
shall also include a hard surface area, which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities
or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development.
Common impervious surfaces include rooftops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or
storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads with compacted subgrade, packed earthen
materials, and oiled, macadam or other surfaces, which similarly impede the natural infiltration of
storm water. Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities shall not be considered as impervious
surfaces.
“In-stream structures” function for the impoundment, diversion, or use of water for hydroelectric
generation and transmission (including public and private facilities), flood control, irrigation,
water supply (domestic and industrial), recreation, or fisheries enhancement.
“Invasive, nonnative vegetation species” means the plants listed for Eastern Washington in
Washington State Noxious Weed Board Publication No. 820-264E (N/6/09), or the latest version
of this document.
“Isolated wetland” means those wetlands and their buffers that are outside of the following critical
areas and their buffers, where applicable: 100-year floodplain, lake, river, stream, or wetland.
Isolated wetlands have no contiguous hydric soil or hydrophytic vegetation between the wetland
and any surface water.
Page 38 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 17
“Landslide” means downslope movement of a mass of soil, rock, snow or ice, including, but not
limited to, rock falls, slumps, mudflows, debris flows, torrents, earth flows, and snow avalanches.
“Landslide hazard areas” means those areas potentially subject to landslides based on a
combination of geologic, topographic, and hydrologic factors.
“Low-intensity land use” includes forestry and open space (such as passive recreation and natural
resources preservation).
“Lowest floor” means the lowest enclosed area (including basement) of a structure. An unfinished
or flood-resistant enclosure, usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or storage in an
area other than a basement area, is not considered a building’s lowest floor; provided, that such
enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable nonelevation design
requirements of these critical area regulations found in PMC 29.25.060, Flood hazard areas (i.e.,
provided there are adequate flood ventilation openings).
“May” means the action is acceptable, provided it conforms to the provisions of this SMP.
“Mitigation sequencing” means the process of avoiding, reducing, or compensating for the adverse
environmental impact(s) of a proposal, including the following actions, listed in the order of
preference, the first being the most preferred:
(a) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
(b) Where impact on critical areas or their buffers will not be avoided, demonstrating
that the impact meets the criteria for granting a shoreline variance permit or other
administratively approved alteration;
(c) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its
implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or
reduce impacts;
(d) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected
environment;
(e) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance
operations during the life of the action;
(f) Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute
resources or environments; and
(g) Monitoring the impact and the compensation projects and taking appropriate
corrective measures.
Page 39 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 18
“Mixed-use” or “mixed-use development” means a combination of uses within the same building
or site as a part of an integrated development project with functional interrelationships an d
coherent physical design that includes a mix of water-oriented and nonwater-oriented uses.
“Moderate-intensity land use” includes residential at a density of one unit per acre or less,
moderate-intensity open space (parks), and agriculture (moderate -intensity land uses such as
orchards and hay fields).
“Monitoring” means the collection of data by various methods for the purpose of understanding
natural systems and features, evaluating the impact of development proposals on such systems,
and/or assessing the performance of mitigation measures imposed as conditions of development.
“Must” means a mandate; the action is required.
“Native vegetation” means plant species that are indigenous to the region.
“New agricultural activities” are activities that meet the definition of agricultural activities but are
proposed on land not in agricultural use at the adoption date of this SMP.
“New construction” means structures for which the start of construction commenced on or after
the effective date of the ordinance codified in this SMP.
“Nonconforming development” or “nonconforming structure” means an existing structure that was
lawfully constructed at the time it was built but is no longer fully consistent with present
regulations such as setbacks, buffers or yards; area; bulk; height or density standards due to
subsequent changes to the master program.
“Nonconforming lot” means a lot that met dimensional requirements of the applicable master
program at the time of its establishment but now contains less than the required width, depth or
area due to subsequent changes to the master program.
“Nonconforming use” means an existing shoreline use that was lawfully established prior to the
effective date of the act or the applicable master program, but which does not conform to present
use regulations due to subsequent changes to the master program.
“Nonwater-oriented uses” means those uses that are not water-dependent, water-related, or water
enjoyment.
“Normal maintenance” means those usual acts that are necessary to prevent a property’s decline,
lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition.
“Normal repair” means to restore a structure or development to a state comparable to its original
condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location, and external
appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair
causes substantial adverse impacts on shoreline resources or environment. Replacement of a
structure or development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common
Page 40 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 19
method of repair for the type of structure or development, and the replacement structure or
development is comparable to the original structure or development, including but not limited to
its size, shape, configuration, location, and external appearance, and the replacement does not
cause substantial adverse impacts on shoreline resources or environment.
“Ordinary high water mark (OHWM)” means that mark that will be found by examining the bed
and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and
so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of
the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may
naturally change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or the
department. Where the OHWM cannot be found, it shall be the line of mean high water. For
braided streams, the OHWM is found on the banks forming the outer limits of the depression
within which the braiding occurs.
“Practical alternative” means an alternative that is available and capable of being carried out after
taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project
purposes, and having less impact on critical areas.
“Primitive trail” means unimproved and unpaved, but physically defined pathway for
nonmotorized movement.
“Priority habitat” means a habitat type with unique or significant value to one or more species. An
area classified and mapped as priority habitat must have one or more of the following attributes:
(a) Comparatively high fish or wildlife density;
(b) Comparatively high fish or wildlife species diversity;
(c) Fish spawning habitat;
(d) Important wildlife habitat;
(e) Important fish or wildlife seasonal range;
(f) Important fish or wildlife movement corridor;
(g) Rearing and foraging habitat;
(h) Refugia habitat;
(i) Limited availability;
(j) High vulnerability to habitat alteration; or
(k) Unique or dependent species.
Page 41 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 20
A priority habitat may be described by a unique vegetation type or by a dominant plant species
that is of primary importance to fish and wildlife. A priority habitat may also be described by a
successional stage (such as old growth and mature forests). Alternatively, a priority habitat may
consist of a specific habitat element (such as caves or snags) of key value to fish and wildlife. A
priority habitat may contain priority and/or nonpriority fish and wildlife.
“Priority species” means species requiring protective measures and/or management guidelines to
ensure their persistence at genetically viable population levels. Priority species are those that meet
any of the following criteria:
(a) Criterion 1. State-listed or state-proposed species. State-listed species are those
native fish and wildlife species legally designated as endangered (WAC 232-12-014),
threatened (WAC 232-12-011), or sensitive (WAC 232-12-011). State-proposed species
are those fish and wildlife species that will be reviewed by the WDFW (POL-M-6001) for
possible listing as endangered, threatened, or sensitive according to the process and criteria
defined in WAC 232-12-297.
(b) Criterion 2. Vulnerable aggregations. Vulnerable aggregations include those
species or groups of animals susceptible to significant population declines, within a specific
area or statewide, by virtue of their inclination to congregate.
(c) Criterion 3. Species of recreational, commercial, and/or tribal importance. Native
and nonnative fish and wildlife species of recreational or commercial importance and
recognized species used for tribal ceremonial and subsistence purposes that are vulnerable
to habitat loss or degradation.
(d) Criterion 4. Species listed under the Federal Endangered Species Act as either
proposed, threatened, or endangered.
“Provisions” means any definition, policy, goal, regulation, requirement, standard, authorization,
prohibition, guideline criteria, or environment designations.
“Public access” means physical and visual access. Public access includes the ability of the general
public to reach, touch, and enjoy the water’s edge, to travel on the waters of the state, and to view
the water and the shoreline from adjacent locations. The following are examples of public access:
(a) Visual Access. Visual public access may consist of view corridors, viewpoints, or
other means of visual approach to public waters.
(b) Physical Access. Physical public access may consist of a dedication of land or
easement and a physical improvement in the form of a walkway, trail, bikeway, park, boat
or canoe and kayak launching ramp, dock area, view platform, or other area serving as a
means of physical approach to public waters adjoining habitat and wildlife areas. A visual
aesthetic will include vegetation and wildlife that exist along the shoreline and not just a
view of the water.
Page 42 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 21
“Public access plan” means the City of Pasco’s Rivershore Linkage and Amenity Plan adopted on
July 16, 2012.
“Public agency” means every city, county, state, or federal office, every officer, every institution,
whether educational, correctional, or other, and every department, division, board, and commission
that provides services or recommendations to the public or other such agencies.
“Public utility” means a public service corporation performing some public service subject to
special governmental regulations, or a governmental agency performing similar public services,
either of which are paid for directly by the recipients thereof. Such services shall include water
supply, electric power, gas, and transportation for persons and freight.
“Qualified professional” means a person with experience and training in the pertinent discipline,
and who is a qualified expert with expertise appropriate for the relevant critical area or shoreline
subject. A qualified professional must have obtained a B.S., B.A., or equivalent degree or
certification in biology, engineering, environmental studies, fisheries, geomorphology, landscape
architecture, forestry or related field, and two years of related work experience.
(a) A qualified professional for wildlife, habitats, or wetlands must have a degree in
biology, zoology, ecology, fisheries, or related field, and professional experience in
Washington State.
(b) A qualified professional for a geological hazard must be a professional engineer or
geologist licensed in the State of Washington.
(c) A qualified professional for critical aquifer recharge areas means a hydrogeologist,
geologist, engineer, or other scientist with experience in preparing hydrogeologic
assessments.
(d) A qualified professional with flood and channel migration zone expertise must be
a hydrologist or fluvial geomorphologist.
(e) A qualified professional for vegetation management must be a registered landscape
architect, certified arborist, biologist, or professional forester with a corresponding degree
or certification.
(f) A qualified archaeologist must be a person qualified for addressing cultural and
historic resources protection and preservation, with a degree in archaeology, anthropology,
history, classics or other germane disciplines with a specialization in archaeology and/or
historic preservation and with a minimum of two years of experience in preparing cultural
resource site assessments reports.
“Recreational development” means the modification of the natural or existing environment to
accommodate commercial and public facilities designed and used to provide recreational
opportunities to the public. Commercial recreational development should be consistent with
commercial development defined herein.
Page 43 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 22
“Recreational vehicle” means a vehicle designed primarily for recreational camping, travel, or
seasonal use that has its own mode of power or is mounted on or towed by another vehicle,
including but not limited to travel trailers, folding camping trailers, truck campers, motor homes,
motorized boats, and multi-use vehicles or any structure inspected, approved, and designated a
recreational vehicle by and bearing the insignia of the State of Washington or any other state or
federal agency having the authority to approve recreational vehicles.
“Research and monitoring” includes activities associated with identifying data, and collecting,
monitoring, and evaluating scientific data and information to support water, fisheries, and other
ecological services management, restoration, and operational activities. Example activities that
could be included under this category include installing and operating stream and water quality
monitoring gauges, collecting fisheries data using a trap or other devices, setting up and using
equipment to collect sediment data, and other data collection activities that need to utilize the
shoreline and waters of the state to meet public objectives.
“Residential development” entails one or more buildings, structures, lots, parcels or portions
thereof that are designed, used, or intended to be used as a place of abode for human beings. These
include single-family residences, residential subdivisions, short residential subdivisions, attached
dwellings, and all accessory uses or structures normally associated with residential uses. Accessory
residential uses include garages, sheds, tennis courts, swimming pools, parking areas, fences,
cabanas, saunas, and guest cottages. Hotels, motels, dormitories, or any other type of overnight or
transient housing is excluded from the residential category and must be considered commercial
uses depending on project characteristics.
“Restore,” “restoration,” or “ecological restoration” means the reestablishment or upgrading of
impaired natural or enhanced ecological shoreline processes or functions. This may be
accomplished through measures, including, but not limited to, revegetation, removal of intrusive
shoreline structures, and removal or treatment of toxic materials. Restoration does not imply a
requirement for returning the shoreline area to pre-aboriginal or pre-European settlement
conditions.
“Riparian habitat” means areas adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contain
elements of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems that mutually influence each other.
“Salmonid” means a member of the fish family Salmonidae, including: King, Chinook, Coho,
chum, sockeye, and pink salmon; cutthroat, brook, brown, rainbow, and steelhead trout; kokanee;
and native char (bull trout and Dolly Varden).
“Section 404 Permit” means a permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for
the placement of dredge or fill material waterward of the OHWM or clearing in waters of the
United States, including wetlands, in accordance with 33 USC § 1344.
“Seismic hazard areas” means areas that are subject to severe risk of damage as a result of
earthquake-induced ground shaking, slope failure, settlement, or soil liquefaction.
Page 44 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 23
“Shall” means a mandate; the action must be done.
“Shoreline areas” and “shoreline jurisdiction” means all “shorelines of the state” and “shorelands”
as defined in RCW 90.58.030.
“Shoreline Master Program” means the comprehensive use plan for a described area and the use
regulations, together with maps, diagrams, charts, or other descriptive material and text, a
statement of desired goals, and standards developed in accordance with the policies enunciated in
RCW 90.58.020. As provided in RCW 36.70A.480, the goals and policies of an SMP for a county
or city approved under Chapter 90.58 RCW shall be considered an element of the county or City’s
Comprehensive Plan. All other portions of the SMP for a county or city adopted under Chapter
90.58 RCW, including use regulations, shall be considered a part of the county or city’s
development regulations.
“Shoreline modifications” means those actions that modify the physical configuration or qualities
of the shoreline area, usually through the construction of a physical element such as a dike,
breakwater, pier, weir, dredged basin, fill, bulkhead, or other shoreline structure. They can include
other actions, such as clearing, grading, or application of chemicals.
“Shoreline stabilization” means actions taken to address erosion impacts to property and dwellings,
businesses, or structures caused by natural processes such as current, flood, wind, or wave action.
These actions include structural and nonstructural methods. Nonstructural methods include
building setbacks, relocation of the structure to be protected, groundwater management, and
planning and regulatory measures to avoid the need for structural stabilization.
“Should” means that the particular action is required unless there is a demonstrated, compelling
reason, based on policy of the SMA and this SMP, against taking the action.
“Significant adverse environmental impacts” (as used in State Environmental Policy Act [SEPA])
means a reasonable likelihood of more than a moderate adverse impact on environmental quality
(WAC 197-11-794).
“Significant vegetation removal” means the removal or alteration of trees, shrubs, and/or ground
cover by clearing, grading, cutting, burning, chemical means, or other activity that causes
significant ecological impacts on functions provided by such vegetation. The removal of invasive
or noxious weeds does not constitute significant vegetation removal. Tree pruning, not including
tree topping, where it does not affect ecological functions, does not constitute significant
vegetation removal.
“Site assessment requirements” means requirements for critical area report.
“Snag” means the remaining trunk of a dying, diseased, or dangerous tree that is reduced in height
and stripped of all live branches.
“Special flood hazard area” means an area subject to a base or 100-year flood; areas of special
flood hazard are shown on a flood hazard boundary map or flood insurance rate map as Zone A,
AO, A1-30, AE, A99, AH.
Page 45 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 24
“Species and habitats of local importance” means those species that may not be endangered,
threatened, or critical from a statewide perspective, but are of local concern due to their population
status, sensitivity to habitat manipulation, or other educational, cultural, or historic attributes.
These species may be priority habitats, priority species, and those habitats and species identified
in the critical areas code as having local importance (e.g., elk).
“Species, threatened and endangered” means those native species that are listed by WDFW
pursuant to RCW 77.12.070 as threatened (WAC 232-12-011) or endangered (WAC 232-12-014),
or that are listed as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (16 USC
§ 1533).
“Start of construction” means and includes substantial improvement and means the date the
building permit was issued; provided, that the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction,
placement, or other improvement was within 180 days of the permit issuance date. For cumulative
tracking, the permit may extend beyond the specified time frame to the time of permit completion.
The actual start means either the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site
such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or
any work beyond the stage of excavation, or the placement of a manufactured home on a
foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading,
and filling, nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways, nor does it include
excavation for a basement, footings, piers, or foundation or the erection of temporary forms, nor
does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings such as garages or sheds not
occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. For a substantial improvement, the
actual start of construction means the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other stru ctural
part of a building, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the building.
“Steep slopes” means those slopes (excluding City-approved geotechnically engineered slopes) 40
percent or steeper within a vertical elevation change of at least 10 feet. A slope is defined by
establishing its toe and top and is measured by averaging the inclination over at least 10 feet of
vertical relief.
“Stream” means any portion of a channel, bed, bank, or bottom waterward of the OHWM of waters
of the state, including areas in which fish may spawn, reside, or pass, and tributary waters with
defined bed or banks, which influence the quality of fish habitat downstream. This includes
watercourses that flow on an intermittent basis or fluctuate in level during the year and applies to
the entire bed of such watercourse whether or not the water is at peak level. This definition does
not include irrigation ditches, canals, storm water runoff devices, or other entirely artificial
watercourses, except where they exist in a natural watercourse that has been altered by humans.
“Structure” means a permanent or temporary edifice or building, or any piece of work artificially
built or comprising parts joined together in some definite manner, whether installed on, above, or
below the surface of the ground or water.
“Substantial damage” means damage of any origin, including intentional and unintentional
demolition, sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before-
Page 46 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 25
damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the assessed value of the structure before
the damage occurred.
“Substantial improvement” means any rehabilitation, repair, reconstruction, addition, or other
improvement of a building when the cost of the improvement equals or exceeds 50 percent of the
market value of the building before start of construction of the improvement. The term includes
buildings that have incurred substantial damage or damage of any origin sustained by a building
when the cost of restoring the building to its pre-damaged condition would equal or exceed 50
percent of the market value before the damage occurred. Substantial improvement does not include
any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of stat e or local health,
sanitary, or safety code specifications, which have been identified by the local code enforcement
official and are the minimum necessary to ensure safe living conditions or any alteration of a
historic structure; provided, that the alteration will not preclude the structure’s continued
designation as a historic structure.
“Substantially degrade” means to cause significant ecological impact.
“Thinning” means the evenly spaced noncommercial removal of up to 40 percent of trees and
woody shrubs.
“Topping” means the severing of main trunks or stems of vegetation at any place above 25 percent
of the vegetation height.
“Transportation facilities” are those structures and developments that provide for the movement
of people, goods, and services. These include roads and highways, railroad facilities, bridges,
parking facilities, bicycle paths, trails, and other related facilities.
“Tree removal” means the removal of a tree, through either direct or indirect actions, including,
but not limited to: (a) clearing, damaging or poisoning resulting in an unhealthy or dead tree; (b)
removal of at least half of the live crown; or (c) damage to roots or trunk that is likely to destroy
the tree’s structural integrity.
“Trees” means any living woody plant characterized by one main stem or trunk and many branches
and having a diameter of four inches or more measured 24 inches above ground level.
“Unavoidable” means adverse impacts that remain after all appropriate and practicable avoidance
and minimization have been achieved.
“Utility” means a service and/or facility that produces, transmits, carries, stores, processes, or
disposes of electrical power, gas, potable water, storm water, communications (including, but not
limited to, telephone and cable), sewage, oil, and the like.
“Vegetation” means plant life growing below, at, and above the soil surface.
“Vegetation alteration” means any clearing, grading, cutting, topping, limbing, or pruning of
vegetation.
Page 47 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 26
“Water-dependent use” means a use or portion of a use that cannot exist in a location that is not
adjacent to the water and that is dependent on the water by reason of the intrinsic nature of its
operations.
“Water-enjoyment use” means a recreational use or other use that facilitates public access to the
shoreline as a primary characteristic of the use or a use that provides for recreational use or
aesthetic enjoyment of the shoreline for a substantial number of people as a general characteristic
of the use, and which through location, design, and operation ensures the public’s ability to enjoy
the physical and aesthetic qualities of the shoreline. In order to qualify as a water enjoyment use,
the use must be open to the general public and the shoreline -oriented space within. The project
must be devoted to the specific aspects of the use that fosters shoreline enjoyment.
“Water-oriented use” means a use that is water-dependent, water-related, or water enjoyment, or
a combination of such uses.
“Water quality” means the physical characteristics of water within shoreline jurisdiction, including
water quantity, hydrological, physical, chemical, aesthetic, recreation-related, and biological
characteristics. Where used in this SMP, the term water quantity refers only to development and
uses regulated under this chapter and affecting water quantity, such as impermeable surfaces and
storm water handling practices. Water quantity, for purposes of this chapter, does not mean the
withdrawal of groundwater or diversion of surface water pursuant to RCW 90.03.250 through
90.03.340.
“Water-related use” means a use or portion of a use, which is not intrinsically dependent on a
waterfront location but whose economic viability is dependent upon a waterfront location because:
(a) The use has a functional requirement for a waterfront location such as the arrival or
shipment of materials by water or the need for large quantities of water; or
(b) The use provides a necessary service supportive of the water dependent uses and
the proximity of the use to its customers makes its services less expensive and/or more
convenient.
“Water resources inventory area” means one of 62 watersheds in the State of Washington, each
comprising drainage areas of a stream or streams, as established in Chapter 173-500 WAC as it
existed on January 1, 1997.
“Weir” means a structure generally built perpendicular to the shoreline for the purpose of diverting
water or trapping sediment or other moving objects transported by water.
“Wetlands” are areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and
duration sufficient to support and that under normal circumstances do support a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include
swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands
intentionally created from nonwetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage
Page 48 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 27
ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds,
and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally
created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those
artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland areas to mitigate the conversion of
wetlands.
Wetland Categories.
(a) Category I. These wetlands are: (i) alkali wetlands; (ii) wetlands that are identified
by scientists of the Washington Natural Heritage Program/WDNR as high quality
wetlands: (iii) bogs; (iv) mature and old-growth forested wetlands over one-fourth acre
with slow-growing trees; (v) forests with stands of aspen; and (vi) wetlands that perform
many functions very well.
(b) Category II. These wetlands are: (i) forested wetlands in the floodplains of rivers;
(ii) mature and old-growth forested wetlands over one-fourth acre with fast-growing trees;
(iii) vernal pools; and (iv) wetlands that perform functions well. These wetlands are
difficult, though not impossible, to replace, and provide high levels of some functions.
(c) Category III. These wetlands are: (i) forested wetlands in the floodplains of rivers;
(ii) mature and old-growth forested wetlands over one-fourth acre with fast-growing trees;
(iii) vernal pools; and (iv) wetlands that perform functions well. These wetlands are
difficult, though not impossible, to replace, and provide high levels of some functions.
(d) Category IV. Category IV wetlands have the lowest level of functions and are often
heavily disturbed. These are wetlands that could be replaced, and in some cases improved.
However, experience has shown that replacement cannot be guaranteed in any specific
case. These wetlands may provide some important functions and also need to be protected.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.080.]
Chapter 29.10
ENVIRONMENT DESIGNATION
Sections:
29.10.010 Environment designations.
29.10.020 Aquatic.
29.10.030 Natural.
29.10.040 Urban conservancy.
29.10.050 Public flood protection.
29.10.060 Recreation.
29.10.070 High intensity – Industrial.
29.10.080 High intensity – Mixed use.
29.10.090 Shoreline residential.
Page 49 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 28
29.10.010 Environment designations.
(1) The City has designated shorelines pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW by defining them,
providing criteria for their identification, and establishing shoreline ecological functions to be
protected. Project proponents are responsible for determining whether a shoreline exists and is
regulated pursuant to this SMP. The SMP classifies the City’s shoreline into eight shoreline
environment designations consistent with the purpose and designation criteria as follows:
(a) Aquatic;
(b) Natural;
(c) Urban conservancy;
(d) Public flood protection;
(e) Recreation;
(f) High intensity – Industrial;
(g) High intensity – Mixed use;
(h) Shoreline residential.
(2) Official Shoreline Maps. Shoreline area designations are delineated on a map by reach and
subreach (SR), hereby incorporated as a part of this SMP (PMC 29.35.170), and shall be known
as the Official Shoreline Map. Maps indicating the extent of shoreline jurisdiction and shoreline
designations are to be used in conjunction with the most current scientific and technical
information available, field investigations, and on site surveys to accurately establish the locati on
and extent of shoreline jurisdiction when a project is proposed.
(3) Unmapped or Undesignated Shorelines. All areas meeting the definition of a shoreline of
the state or a Shoreline of Statewide Significance, whether mapped or not, are subject to the
provisions of this SMP.
(4) Interpretation of Environment Designation Boundaries.
(a) Whenever existing physical features are inconsistent with boundaries on the
Official Shoreline Map, the Shoreline Administrator shall interpret the boundaries. Appeals
of such interpretations may be filed pursuant to PMC 29.35.120, Appeals.
(b) All shoreline areas waterward of the OHWM shall be designated aquatic.
(c) Only one shoreline area designation shall apply to a given shoreland area. In the
case of parallel designations, designations shall be divided along an identified linear
Page 50 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 29
feature. Such linear features shall be clearly noted in the metadata associated with the
Official Shoreline Map.
(d) All areas within shorelines that are not mapped and/or designated are automatically
assigned an urban conservancy designation.
(e) Environment designations for shorelines within the UGA will be effective
immediately upon annexation of the area into the City limits.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.100.]
29.10.020 Aquatic.
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the aquatic shoreline designation is to protect, restore, and manage
the unique characteristics and resources of the areas waterward of the OHWM.
(2) Designation Criteria. An aquatic shoreline designation is assigned to lands and waters
waterward of the OHWM.
(3) Management Policies.
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP, the
following management policies shall apply:
(i) New overwater structures should be allowed only for water-dependent uses,
public access, recreation, or ecological restoration.
(ii) Shoreline uses and modifications should be designed and managed to
prevent degradation of water quality and natural hydrographic conditions.
(iii) In-water uses should be allowed where impacts can be mitigated to ensure
no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. Permitted in-water uses must be
managed to avoid impacts to shoreline ecological functions. Unavoidable impacts
must be minimized and mitigated.
(iv) On navigable waters or their beds, all uses and developments should be
located and designed to:
(A) Minimize interference with surface navigation;
(B) Consider impacts to public views; and
(C) Allow for the safe, unobstructed passage of fish and wildlife,
particularly species dependent on migration.
Page 51 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 30
(b) Multiple or shared use of overwater and water-access facilities should be
encouraged to reduce the impacts of shoreline development and increase effective use of
water resources.
(c) Structures and activities permitted should be related in size, form, design, and
intensity of use to those permitted in the immediately adjacent upland area. The size of new
overwater structures should be limited to the minimum necessary to support the structure’s
intended use.
(d) Natural light should be allowed to penetrate to the extent necessary to support
fisheries and nearshore aquatic habitat unless other illumination is required by state or
federal agencies.
(e) Shoreline uses, development, activities, and modifications in the aquatic shoreline
designation requiring use of adjacent landside property should be in a shoreline designation
that allows that use, development, activity, or modification.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.110.]
29.10.030 Natural.
(All islands, Subreach [SR] 1d)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the natural shoreline designation is to protect those shoreline areas
that are relatively free of human influence or that include intact or minimall y degraded shoreline
ecological functions less tolerant of human use. These systems require that only very low-intensity
uses be allowed in order to maintain the ecological functions and ecosystem-wide processes.
Consistent with the policies of the designation, restoration of degraded shorelines within this
environment is appropriate.
(2) Designation Criteria. The following criteria should be considered in assigning a natural
environment designation:
(a) The shoreline ecological functions are substantially intact and have a high
opportunity for preservation and low opportunity for restoration;
(b) The shoreline is generally in public or conservancy ownership or under covenant,
easement, or a conservation tax program;
(c) The shoreline contains little or no development or is planned for development that
would have minimal adverse impacts to ecological functions or risk to human safety;
(d) The shoreline has high potential for low-impact, passive, or public recreation; and
(e) The shoreline is considered to represent ecosystems and geologic types that have
high scientific and educational value.
Page 52 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 31
(3) Management Policies. In addition to other applicable policies and regulations, the
following management policies shall apply:
(a) Any use beyond existing uses that would substantially degrade shoreline ecological
functions or natural character of the shoreline area should not be allowed;
(b) Scientific, historic, cultural, educational research, and low -impact, passive
recreational uses are allowed in addition to existing uses, while meeting no net loss of
ecological function requirements;
(c) Single-family residential development may be allowed as a conditional use if the
density and intensity of such use is limited as necessary to protect ecological functions and
is consistent with the purpose of the environment;
(d) Vegetation should remain undisturbed except for removal of noxious vegetation
and invasive species through ongoing management activities or as part of a development
proposal. Proposed subdivision or lot line adjustments, new development, or significant
vegetation removal that would reduce the capability of vegetation to perform normal
ecological functions should not be allowed;
(e) Uses that would deplete physical or biological resources or impair views to or from
the shoreline over time should be prohibited;
(f) Only physical alterations that serve to support an existing use, protect a significant
or unique physical, biological, or visual shoreline feature that might otherwise be degraded
or destroyed, or those alterations that are the minimum necessary to support a permitted
use should be allowed; and
(g) Only the following types of signs should be considered for location in the
shorelines: interpretive, directional, navigational, regulatory, and public.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.120.]
29.10.040 Urban conservancy.
(Open-space areas located waterward of the parcel boundaries in the Columbia River Reach 1,
Subreaches (SR) 3a (north portion of Chiawana Park), 3b, 5c (nonlevee portion of the wetland near
Riverview Park), 6c (portion waterward of the trail), Reach 7 (Sacajawea Park, excluding the boat
launch and recreation area), and SR 8a.)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the urban conservancy environment is to protect and restore
ecological functions of open space, floodplain, and other sensitive lands where they exist in urban
and developed settings, while allowing a variety of compatible uses.
Page 53 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 32
(2) Designation Criteria. The following criteria are used to consider an urban conservancy
environment designation:
(a) The shoreline contains open space, floodplain, or other sensitive areas that should
not be more intensively developed;
(b) The shoreline has riparian vegetation with high to moderate ecological functions;
(c) The shoreline has potential for development that is compatible with ecological
restoration; or
(d) The shoreline is not generally suitable for water-dependent uses, however, has
moderate-to-high potential for public, water-related, or water-enjoyment uses where
ecological functions can be maintained or restored.
(3) Management Policies. In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this
SMP, the following management policies shall apply:
(a) Shoreline uses that preserve the natural character of the area or promote
preservation of open space, floodplain, or sensitive lands either directly or during the long-
term should be the primary allowed uses. Uses that result in restoration of ecological
functions should be allowed if the use is otherwise compatible with the purpose of the
environment and the setting.
(b) Encourage regulations for shoreline stabilization measures, vegetation
conservation, water quality, and shoreline modifications to ensure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions;
(c) Public access and public recreation uses should be allowed whenever feasible and
significant ecological impacts can be mitigated; or
(d) Water-oriented uses should be given priority over nonwater-oriented uses. For
shoreline areas adjacent to commercially navigable waters, water-dependent uses should
be given priority.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.130.]
29.10.050 Public flood protection.
(Leveed areas along the Columbia River, where limited ecological function and future
development potential exists, and the areas are dedicated for public recreation as part of the
regional trail system.)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the public flood protection environment designation is to provide
flood protection features while protecting shoreline ecological functions with limitations imposed
by the flood protection features, and provide recreational opportunities. In addition to existing
Page 54 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 33
levees, examples of uses that are appropriate in a public flood protection shoreline designation
include public access and recreation uses consistent with the protection of public safety and
property by the flood protection features.
(2) Designation Criteria. The following criteria are used to consider a public flood protection
environment designation:
(a) The shoreline has low-to-moderate ecological function with low-to-moderate
opportunity for preservation or restoration;
(b) The shoreline is owned and maintained by public agencies;
(c) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is related to flood
protection, public utility, infrastructure, and low-intensity recreation, facility rehabilitation,
or upgrade modifications;
(d) The shoreline has limited scientific or educational value or unique historic or
cultural resources values; or
(e) The shoreline has low-to-moderate potential for public, water-oriented recreation
where ecological functions can be maintained or restored.
(3) Management Policies. In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this
SMP, the following management policies shall apply:
(a) In regulating uses in the Public Flood Protection environment, first priority should
be given to flood protection and water-dependent public facility uses. Second priority
should be given to water-related and water-enjoyment uses that are not in conflict with the
flood protection uses. Nonwater-oriented uses are allowed as part of the operational needs.
(b) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions
as a result of redevelopment, facility upgrades, and new development. Where applicable,
development shall include environmental enhancement of the shoreline in accordance with
USACE McNary Pool Management Plan and the City’s SMP Restoration Plan.
(c) Existing visual and physical public access opportunities shall be maintained and
enhanced where feasible and appropriate, as consistent with PMC 29.15.070, Public access.
(d) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as appropriate
landscape features, screening, and maintenance of natural vegetative buffers.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.140.]
29.10.060 Recreation.
(Chiawana, Wade, Riverview, Schlagel, and Sacajawea parks, marina, boat launch areas)
Page 55 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 34
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the recreation environment designation is to provide for water-
oriented recreational uses with some commercial uses to support recreational uses while protecting
existing ecological functions, conserving existing natural resources, and restoring ecological
functions in areas that have been previously degraded.
(2) Designation Criteria. The following criteria are used to consider a recreation environment
designation:
(a) The shoreline has low-to-moderate ecological function with low-to-moderate
opportunity for preservation and restoration.
(b) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is recreation-related with
potential for additional recreation and recreation-related commerce or is suitable and
planned for water-oriented uses.
(c) The shoreline has existing recreation uses or moderate-to-high potential for public
and private water-oriented recreation where ecological functions can be maintained or
enhanced.
(d) The shoreline has limited scientific or educational value or unique historic or
cultural resources values.
(3) Management Policies. In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this
SMP, the following management policies shall apply:
(a) In regulating uses in the recreation environment, first priority should be given to
water-dependent recreational uses. Second priority should be given to water-related and
water-enjoyment recreational uses. Nonwater-oriented uses should not be allowed, except
as part of mixed-use developments with a recreation focus.
(b) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions
as a result of new development. Consistent with the City’s SMP Restoration Plan, new
development may be required, as applicable, to include restoration of shoreline functions
as part of project proposals.
(c) Where feasible, visual and physical public access should be required as provided
for in PMC 29.15.070, Public access. Recreational objectives should be enhanced by
combining physical and visual public access opportunities with other recreational
opportunities where feasible.
(d) Water-oriented commercial uses should be allowed.
(e) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as sign control
regulations, appropriate development siting, screening, architectural standards, and
maintenance of natural vegetative buffers.
Page 56 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 35
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.150.]
29.10.070 High intensity – Industrial.
(Areas landward of the levee in SR 5b, Port of Pasco, a portion of Osprey Point, industrial areas
on Columbia River SR 6c, and the Snake River SR 8b)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the high intensity – industrial environment designation is to
provide for public and private commercial and industrial uses that need a shoreline location for
operation and are associated with water-oriented commerce and industry. Examples of uses that
are appropriate in a high intensity – industrial shoreline environment include water-oriented
commercial uses, water supply diversion, transportation, navigation uses, barge and conveyance
facilities, and similar uses. This environment may also provide for some recreation, while
protecting existing ecological functions and restoring ecological functions in areas that have been
previously degraded.
(2) Designation Criteria. Assign a high intensity – industrial environment designation to
shoreline areas where:
(a) The shoreline has low-to-moderate ecological function with low-to-moderate
opportunity for preservation or restoration.
(b) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is related to public utility,
infrastructure, industry, or commerce with potential for additional related development,
facility rehabilitation, or upgrade modifications.
(c) Existing landward industrial development exists and has potential for future growth
and development.
(d) The operation of such uses depends on proximity to water, including high-intensity
uses related to industrial production, conveyance, transportation, or navigation.
(e) The shoreline has limited scientific or educational value or unique historic or
cultural resources values.
(3) Management Policies. In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this
SMP, the following management policies shall apply:
(a) In regulating uses in the high intensity – industrial environment, first priority
should be given to water-dependent commercial and industrial uses. Second priority should
be given to water-related and water-enjoyment uses that are not in conflict with the
commercial and industrial uses. Nonwater-oriented uses are allowed as part of mixed uses
to support the water-oriented uses.
Page 57 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 36
(b) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions
as a result of redevelopment, facility upgrades, and new development. Where applicable,
development shall include environmental cleanup and restoration of the shoreline to
comply in accordance with any relevant state and federal law.
(c) Where feasible and appropriate, visual and physical public access provisions may
be included as consistent with PMC 29.15.070, Public access.
(d) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as appropriate
development siting, screening, and maintenance of natural vegetative buffers.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.160.]
29.10.080 High intensity – Mixed use.
(Port of Pasco Marine Terminal SR 6a and western half of Osprey Point)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the high intensity – mixed use environment designation is to
provide for water-oriented commercial and retail uses along with residential uses. Examples of
uses that are appropriate in a high intensity – mixed use shoreline environment include water-
oriented commercial office and retail, residential, transportation, public access, and similar uses.
This environment may also provide for some recreation, while protecting existing ecological
functions and restoring ecological functions in areas that have been previously degraded.
(2) Designation Criteria. Assign a high intensity – mixed use environment designation to
shoreline areas where:
(a) The shoreline has low-to-moderate ecological function with low-to-moderate
opportunity for preservation or restoration.
(b) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is related to public utility,
infrastructure, or commerce with potential for additional related development, facility
rehabilitation, or upgrade modifications.
(c) Existing landward development exists and has potential for future growth and
development.
(d) The operation of such uses depends on proximity to water, including high-intensity
uses related to commerce, transportation, or navigation.
(e) The shoreline has limited or no scientific, educational, unique historic, or cultural
resources values.
(3) Management Policies. In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this
SMP, the following management policies shall apply:
Page 58 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 37
(a) Development in the high intensity – mixed-use environment should be managed so
it enhances and maintains the shorelines for a variety of urban uses.
(b) In regulating uses in the high intensity – mixed use environment, first priority
should be given to water-dependent commercial uses. Second priority should be given to
water-related and water-enjoyment uses that are not in conflict with the commercial uses.
Nonwater-oriented uses are allowed as part of mixed uses to support the water-oriented
uses. Residential uses should be allowed on the upper floors of developments as part of
mixed uses to support the water-oriented uses.
(c) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions
as a result of redevelopment, facility upgrades, and new development. Where applicable,
development shall include environmental cleanup and restoration of the shoreline to
comply in accordance with any relevant state and federal law.
(d) Where feasible and appropriate, visual and physical public access provisions may
be included as consistent with PMC 29.15.070, Public access.
(e) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means, such as appropriate
development siting, building design, screening, and maintenance of natural vegetative
buffers.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.170.]
29.10.090 Shoreline residential.
(Residential areas along the Columbia River in Reaches 1 and 2, SRs 4a and 4b, and portions of
SRs 5b and 6b)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the shoreline residential environment designation is to
accommodate primarily residential development and appurtenant structures, but also allow other
types of development consistent with this section. An additional purpose is to provide appropriate
public access and recreational uses.
(2) Designation Criteria. Assign a shoreline residential environment designation to shoreline
areas where:
(a) The shoreline has low-to-moderate ecological function with low-to-moderate
opportunity for restoration.
(b) The shoreline contains mostly residential development at urban densities or in
clusters in more rural settings.
(c) The shoreline has low-to-moderate potential for low-impact, passive, or active
water-oriented recreation where ecological functions can be restored.
Page 59 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 38
(3) Management Policies. In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this
SMP, the following management policies shall apply:
(a) Encourage regulations that ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions as a
result of new development, such as limiting lot coverage, providing adequate setbacks from
the shoreline, promoting vegetation conservation, reducing the need for shoreline
stabilization, and maintaining or improving water quality.
(b) The scale and density of new uses and development should be compatible with the
existing residential character of the area.
(c) Public access and joint (rather than individual) use of recreational facilities should
be promoted.
(d) Access, utilities, and public services to serve proposed development within
shorelines should be constructed outside shorelines to the extent feasible and be the
minimum necessary to adequately serve existing needs and planned future development.
(e) Public or private outdoor recreation facilities should be provided with proposals for
subdivision development and encouraged with all shoreline development, if compatible
with the character of the area. Priority should be given first to water-dependent and then to
water-enjoyment recreation facilities.
(f) Commercial development should be limited to water-oriented uses. Nonwater-
oriented commercial uses should only be allowed as part of mixed-used developments.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.180.]
Chapter 29.15
GENERAL REGULATIONS
Sections:
29.15.010 Shoreline use and modification.
29.15.020 Development standards.
29.15.030 Archaeological and historic resources.
29.15.040 Environmental protection.
29.15.050 Shoreline vegetation conservation.
29.15.060 Water quality, storm water, and nonpoint pollution.
29.15.070 Public access.
29.15.080 Flood hazard reduction.
29.15.010 Shoreline use and modification.
(1) Regulations.
Page 60 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 39
(a) PMC Table 29.15.010 indicates which shoreline activities, uses, developments, and
modifications may be allowed or are prohibited in the shoreline jurisdiction within each
shoreline environment designation. Activities, uses, developments, and modifications are
classified as follows:
(i) “Permitted uses” require a shoreline substantial development permit or a
shoreline exemption.
(ii) “Conditional uses” require a shoreline special use permit per PMC
29.35.060.
(iii) “Prohibited” activities, uses, developments, and modifications are not
allowed and cannot be permitted through a variance or shoreline special use permit.
(iv) This chapter, General Regulations, and Chapter 29.20 PMC, Shoreline
Modifications and Use Regulations, shall be considered for additional limitations.
(b) All uses shall comply with the written provisions and regulations in this SMP and
the shoreline use and modification matrix in Table 29.15.010. Where there is a conflict between
the chart and the written provisions in this SMP, the written provisions shall control.
(2) General.
(a) Accessory uses shall be subject to the same shoreline permit process as their
primary use.
(b) Authorized uses and modifications shall be allowed only in shoreline jurisdictions
where the underlying zoning allows for it and subject to the policies and regulations of this
SMP.
(c) A use is considered unclassified when it is not listed in Table 29.15.010 or in the
Chapter 29.20 PMC, Shoreline Modification and Uses Regulations. Any proposed
unclassified use may be authorized as a conditional use; provided, that the applicant can
demonstrate consistency with the requirements of this SMP.
(d) If any part of a proposed activity, use, modification, or development is not eligible
for exemption per PMC 29.35.080, Exemptions from shoreline substantial development
permits, then a shoreline substantial development permit or shoreline special use permit
shall be required for the entire proposed development project.
(e) When a specific use or modification extends into the Aquatic environment and an
abutting upland environment without clear separation (e.g., private moorage facility or
shoreline stabilization), the most restrictive permit process shall apply to that use or
modification.
Page 61 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 40
(f) Shoreline and critical areas buffers found in Chapter 29.25 PMC apply to all uses
and modifications unless stated otherwise in the regulations.
(g) None of the allowed uses shall be conducted in the floodway in any environment
designation, except as allowed by PMC 29.25.060, Flood hazard areas.
(h) Administrative interpretation of these regulations shall be done according to PMC
29.35.020(2).
(3) Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix.
Table 29.15.010. Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix for City of Pasco
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
Resource Uses
Agriculture X X A1 X X X X C
Mining X X C X X C C X
Boating Facilities
Boat launch (motorized boats) A C C A A A A C
Boat launch (nonmotorized boats –
canoe/kayak) A C A A A A A A
Marina A X C C A A A C
Page 62 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 41
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
Docks, Piers, Mooring Facilities
Private and shared moorage A X A A A A A A
Public moorage A X A A A A A C
Covered moorage C X X X C C C X
Commercial Development
Water-dependent A X A A A A A A
Water-related, water-enjoyment C X C C A A A C
Nonwater-oriented C2 X C2 C2 A2 A2 A2 X
Dredging Activities
Dredging A NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Dredge material disposal C X C C C C C C
Dredging and disposal as part of
ecological restoration/enhancement A A A A A A A A
Page 63 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 42
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
Fill and Excavation
Fill waterward of OHWM and in
floodways3 C C C C C C C C
Other upland fill NA C A A A A A A
Excavation NA C4 C A A A A A
Industrial Uses
Water-dependent A5 X X C X A A X
Water-related, water enjoyment A5 X X C X A A X
Nonwater-oriented X X X C2 X A2 A2 X
In-water Modifications
Breakwater C X C C C C C C
Groins and weirs C X C C C C C C
In-stream structures6 A C4 C4 A4, 6 A3 A C C
Page 64 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 43
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
Recreational Development
Water-dependent A A7 A7 A A A A A
Water-related, water-enjoyment
(trails, accessory buildings) C C7 A7 A A A A A
Nonwater-oriented X X C2 C2 A2 A2 A2 A2
Residential Development X C A X C X A2 A
Research and Monitoring
Water-dependent A A A A A A A A
Water-related, water enjoyment A A A A A A A A
Nonwater-oriented A A A A A A A A
Shoreline habitat and natural systems
enhancement projects A A A A A A A A
Shoreline Stabilization and Flood Control
Page 65 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 44
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
Flood Control
Modification of existing flood
control facilities (dams, dikes and
levees), including replacement
landward of existing location
A A A A A A A A
New flood control facilities (Dams,
Dikes and Levees) C C8 C C C A A C
Shoreline stabilization – New
Hard C X C C C A A C
Soft A A A A A A A A
Shoreline stabilization –
Replacement9 A A A A A A A A
Transportation
Highways, arterials, railroads
(parallel to OHWM) C X A A A A A A
Page 66 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 45
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
Secondary/public access roads
(parallel to OHWM) X X A A A A A A
Roads perpendicular to the OHWM X C A A A A A A
Bridges (perpendicular to shoreline) C C C A A A A C
Existing bridges, trails, roads, and
parking facilities: improvement or
expansion
A A A A A A A A
New parking, primary X X X A10 A10 A10 A10 X
New parking, accessory X Takes permit types of primary use
Utilities
Above-ground and underground
utilities (parallel and across
shoreline)
C C A A A A A A
Notes:
1 Allowed when agricultural uses are passive, such as livestock grazing, harvesting of
noncultivated crops, or small-scale farms, or when ecological functions are degraded to the point
where the land is functionally equivalent to cultivated land.
Page 67 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 46
2 New uses are allowed as part of mixed use or according to PMC 29.20.040(2) for commercial
development, PMC 29.20.070(2) for industrial development, or as part of an existing use according
to Chapter 29.30 PMC, Existing Uses, Structures and Lots.
3 Fill and excavation waterward of the OHWM, to support ecological restor ation is allowed with
a substantial development permit.
4 Habitat restoration and/or fish habitat enhancement purposes only.
5 Allowed as part of upland industrial water-dependent or water-related uses.
6 Construction, practices, and maintenance of facilities necessary for flood protection or Columbia
Basin Project operations and associated water-dependent uses to access, pump, and convey water
for project purposes to public agencies or private water users and as consistent with permit
exemptions described in PMC 29.35.080.
7 Low intensity only.
8 Only when no other alternatives are available.
9 Exempt for protective bulkhead common to single-family residences according to PMC
29.35.080(4) and when consistent with PMC 29.20.140(5) and (6).
10 Not allowed within 50 feet of edge of riparian vegetation corridor.
OHWM = ordinary high water mark
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.200.]
29.15.020 Development standards.
(1) Regulations.
(a) To preserve the existing and planned character of the shoreline consistent with the
purposes of the shoreline environment designations, development standards are provided
in the table below. These standards apply to all uses and modifications unless otherwise
indicated. In addition, shoreline developments shall comply with all other dimensional
requirements of the PMC.
(b) When a development or use is proposed that does not comply with the dimensional
performance standards of this SMP, or is not otherwise allowed by administrative reduction
or administrative modification, such development or use can only be authorized by
approval of a shoreline variance permit.
(c) No permit shall be issued for any new or expanded building or structure of more
than 35 feet above average grade level on shorelines of the state that will obstruct the view
of a substantial number of residences on areas adjoining such shorelines, except for the
high intensity environment designation areas, or where the SMP does not prohibit the same,
and then only when overriding considerations of the public interest will be served.
(2) Shoreline Development Standards Matrix.
Page 68 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 47
Table 29.15.020. Shoreline Development Standards Matrix for City of Pasco
Use/Modification Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Mixed Use High Intensity – Industrial Shoreline Residential Building height1 15 N/A 35 35 35 45 No
limit
35
Building line setback in feet NA 10 – 15
Impervious surface cover –
maximum (%)2
NA 5% 20% 10% 20% 50% 100% 50%
Riparian buffer width in feet2,
3, 4
NA Conserve
entire
area
75 50 50 5 50 50
Trail width in feet NA NA 20 feet or as required by Americans with
Disabilities Act regulations. Trails on
private properties and not open for public
use shall be up to five feet wide.
Notes:
1 According to PMC 29.15.020(1)(c).
2 Accompanied by storm water management measures/facilities, wetland protections and other
protections as applicable.
3 Measured from the OHWM or top of bank as applicable.
4 Except where roadway, paved trail, or parking area or other development that has eliminated or
constrained ecological functions encroaches, and then to the waterward edge of the facility
maintenance area, as applicable.
NA = not applicable
Page 69 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 48
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.210.]
29.15.030 Archaeological and historic resources.
(1) The City will coordinate with tribal, state and federal agencies that maintain inventories of
known significant historic, cultural and archaeological sites, and work with these agencies in the
permit review process in complying with state and federal regulations and laws to protect sites and
areas that have historic, cultural, and archaeological values. Existing policies also reinforce this
action, as written, so no additional changes are planned.
(1)(2) In all developments, whenever an archaeological area or historic site is discovered by a
development in the shoreline area, the developer shall comply with applicable state and federal
laws and regulations.
(2)(3) Developers and property owners shall stop work immediately and notify the local
government, the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, and affected Indian tribes if
archaeological resources are uncovered during excavation.
(3)(4) Permits issued in areas documented to contain archaeological resources shall require a site
inspection or evaluation by a professional archaeologist in coordination with affected Indian tribes.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.220.]
29.15.040 Environmental protection.
(1) All project proposals, including those for which a shoreline substantial development permit
is not required, shall comply with Chapter 43.21C RCW, the Washington State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA).
(2) Applicants shall apply the following mitigation sequencing steps in order of priority to
avoid or minimize significant adverse effects and significant ecological impacts (with (a) being
top priority):
(a) Avoid the adverse impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an
action;
(b) Minimize adverse impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its
implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or
reduce impacts;
(c) Rectify the adverse impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected
environment to the conditions existing at the time of the initiation of the project;
(d) Reduce or eliminate the adverse impact over time by preservation and maintenance
operations;
Page 70 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 49
(e) Compensate for the adverse impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute
resources or environments; and
(f) Monitor the adverse impact and the compensation projects and take appropriate
corrective measures.
(3) Projects that cause significant adverse environmental impacts, as defined in WAC 197-11-
794 and PMC 29.05.070, Definitions, are not allowed unless mitigated according to subsection (2)
of this section, to avoid reduction or damage to ecosystem-wide processes and ecological
functions. As part of this analysis, the applicant shall evaluate whether the project may adversely
affect existing hydrologic connections between streams and wetlands and either modify the project
or mitigate any impacts as needed.
(4) When compensatory measures are appropriate pursuant to the mitigation priority sequence
in subsection (2) of this section, preferential consideration shall be given to measures that replace
the adversely impacted functions directly and in the immediate vicinity of the adverse impact.
However, alternative compensatory mitigation may be authorized within the affected drainage area
or watershed that addresses limiting factors or identified critical needs for shoreline resource
conservation based on watershed or resource management plans, including the shoreline
restoration plan, applicable to the area of adverse impact. Authorization of compensatory
mitigation measures may require appropriate safeguards, terms, or conditions as necessary to
ensure no net loss of ecological functions.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.230.]
29.15.050 Shoreline vegetation conservation.
(1) Vegetation conservation standards shall not apply retroactively to existing uses and
developments. Vegetation associated with existing structures, uses, and developments may be
maintained within shoreline jurisdiction as stipulated in the approval documents for the
development.
(2) Regulations specifying establishment and management of shoreline buffers are located in
the Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas. Vegetation within shoreline buffers, other stream buffers,
and wetlands and wetland buffers shall be managed consistent with Chapter 29.25 PMC.
(3) Vegetation outside of shoreline buffers, other stream buffers, and wetlands and wetland
buffers and within shoreline jurisdiction shall be managed according to PMC 29.15.040,
Environmental protection, and any other regulations specific to vegetation management contained
in other sections of this SMP.
(4) Vegetation clearing outside of wetlands and wetland and stream buffers shall be limited to
the minimum necessary to accommodate approved shoreline development that is consistent with
all other provisions of this SMP. Mitigation sequencing per PMC 29.15.040, Environmental
Page 71 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 50
protection, shall be applied so the design and location of the structure or development minimizes
native vegetation removal.
(5) Removal of noxious weeds and/or invasive species shall be incorporated in management
and mitigation plans, as necessary, to facilitate establishment of a stable community of native
plants.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.240.]
29.15.060 Water quality, storm water, and nonpoint pollution.
(1) The location, design, construction, and management of all shoreline uses and activities
shall protect the quality and quantity of surface and groundwater adjacent to the site.
(2) When applicable, all shoreline development should comply with the requirements of the
latest version of Ecology’s Storm water Management Manual for Eastern Washington.
(3) Best management practices (BMPs) for control of erosion and sedimentation shall be
implemented for all shoreline development.
(4) Potentially harmful materials, including, but not limited to, oil, chemicals, tires, or
hazardous materials, shall not be allowed to enter any body of water or wetland, or to be discharged
onto the land. Potentially harmful materials shall be maintained in safe and leakproof containers.
(5) Within 25 feet of a water body, herbicides, fungicides, fertilizers, and pesticides shall be
applied in strict conformance to the manufacturer’s recommendations and in accordance with
relevant state and federal laws. Further, pesticides subject to the final ruling in Washington Toxics
Coalition, et al., v. EPA shall not be applied within 60 feet for ground applications or within 300
feet for aerial applications of the subject water bodies and shall be applied by a qualified
professional in accordance with state and federal law.
(6) New development shall provide storm water management facilities designed, constructed,
and maintained in accordance with the latest version of Ecology’s Storm Water Management
Manual for Eastern Washington, including the use of BMPs. Additionally, new development shall
implement low-impact development techniques where feasible and necessary to fully implement
the core elements of the Surface Water Design Manual.
(7) For development activities with the potential for adverse impacts on water quality or
quantity in a stream or fish and wildlife habitat conservation area, a critical area report as
prescribed in the Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas, shall be prepared. Such reports should
discuss the project’s potential to exacerbate water quality parameters which are impaired, and for
which total maximum daily loads for that pollutant have been established, and prescribe any
necessary mitigation and monitoring.
(8) All materials that may come in contact with water shall be constructed of materials, such
as untreated wood, concrete, and approved plastic composites or steel, that will not adversely affect
Page 72 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 51
water quality or aquatic plants or animals. Materials used for decking or other structural
components shall be approved by applicable state agencies for contact with water to avoid
discharge of pollutants from wave or boat wake splash, rain, or runoff. Wood treated with creosote,
copper chromium, arsenic, or pentachlorophenol is prohibited in shoreline water bodies.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.250.]
29.15.070 Public access.
(1) Applicants required to provide shoreline public access shall provide physical or visual
access, consistent with the City of Pasco’s public access plan and other agencies’ management
plans when applicable, unless specifically exempted in this section. Examples of physical and
visual access are listed below:
(a) Visual Access. Visual public access may consist of view corridors, viewpoints, or
other means of visual approach to public waters.
(b) Physical Access. Physical public access may consist of a dedication of land or
easement and a physical improvement in the form of a walkway, trail, bikeway, park, boat
or canoe and kayak launching ramp, dock area, view platform, or other area serving as a
means of physical approach to public waters.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, new uses shall provide for safe and
convenient public access to and along the shoreline where any of the following conditions are
present:
(a) The development is proposed by a public entity or on public lands;
(b) The nature of the proposed use, activity, or development will likely result in an
increased demand for public access to the shoreline;
(c) The proposed use, activity, or development is not a water-oriented or other
preferred shoreline use, activity, or development under the SMA, such as a nonwater-
oriented commercial or recreational use;
(d) The proposed use, activity, or development may block or discourage the use of
customary and established public access paths, walkways, trails, or corridors;
(e) The proposed use, activity, or development will interfere with the public use,
activity, and enjoyment of shoreline areas or water bodies subject to the public trust
doctrine;
(f) The proposed use, activity, or development includes key areas for public access
recommended in the City’s public access plan and/or shoreline restoration plan; or
Page 73 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 52
(g) The proposed activity is a publicly financed shoreline erosion-control measure
(when feasible).
(3) An applicant shall not be required to provide public access where one or more of the
following conditions apply; provided, that such exceptions shall not be used to prevent
implementing the City’s public access plan and other agencies’ management plans. In determining
the infeasibility, undesirability, or incompatibility of public access in a given situation, the City
shall consider alternative methods of providing public access, such as off-site improvements,
viewing platforms, separation of uses through site planning and design, and restricting hours of
public access:
(a) The proposed use, activity, or development only involves the construction of four
or fewer single-family or multifamily dwellings;
(b) The proposed use is within an area where public access is not proposed in the public
access plan, and the use will not increase public access demand or reduce public access;
(c) The proposed use is an agricultural activity;
(d) The nature of the use, activity, or development or the characteristics of the site make
public access requirements inappropriate due to health, safety (including consistency with
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design [CPTED] principles, where applicable),
or environmental hazards; the proponent shall carry the burden of demonstrating by
substantial evidence the existence of unavoidable or unmitigable threats or hazards to
public health, safety, or the environment that would be created or exacerbated by public
access upon the site;
(e) An existing, new, or expanded road or utility crossing through shoreline jurisdiction
shall not create the need for public access if the development being accessed or served by
the road or utility is located outside of shoreline jurisdiction;
(f) The proposed use, activity, or development has security requirements that are not
feasible to address through the application of alternative design features for public access,
such as off-site improvements, viewing platforms, and separation of uses through site
planning and design;
(g) The economic cost of providing for public access at the site is unreasonably
disproportionate to the total long-term economic value of the proposed use, activity, or
development;
(h) Safe and convenient public access already exists in the general vicinity, and/or the
public access plan shows adequate public access at the property;
(i) Public access has reasonable potential to threaten or harm the natural functions and
native characteristics of the shoreline and/or is deemed detrimental to threatened or
endangered species under the Endangered Species Act; and
Page 74 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 53
(j) The site is within or part of an overall development, a binding site plan, or a planned
unit development, which has previously provided public access adequate to serve the
project in full build-out through other application processes.
(4) Public access shall be located and designed to respect private property rights, be compatible
with the shoreline environment, protect ecological functions and processes, protect aesthetic values
of shoreline, and provide for public safety (including consistency with CPTED principles, where
applicable).
(5) For any development where public access is not required, shared community access may
be allowed if there is no existing or planned public access along the shoreline identified in the City
and other agencies’ plan. Where provided, community access shall be subject to all applicable
development standards of this section. Shared community access is not required when any of the
conditions under subsection (3) of this section applies.
(6) General Performance Standards.
(a) Uses, activities, and developments shall not interfere with the regular and
established public use.
(b) Shoreline substantial development or conditional uses shall minimize the impact on
views of shoreline water bodies from public land or substantial numbers of residences.
(c) Proponents shall include within their shoreline applications an evaluation of a
proposed use, activity, or development’s likely adverse impact on current public access
and future demands for access to the site. Such evaluation shall consider potential
alternatives and mitigation measures to further the policies of this SMP and the provisions
of this section.
(d) Public access easements, trails, walkways, corridors, and other facilities may
encroach upon any buffers or setbacks required in Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas, or
under other provisions of this SMP; provided, that such encroachment does not conflict
with other policies and regulations of this SMP, and no net loss of ecological function can
be achieved. Any encroachment into a buffer or setback must be as close to the landward
edge of the buffer as possible.
(e) Public access facilities shall accommodate persons with disabilities, unless
determined infeasible by the Shoreline Administrator.
(7) Trails and Levees.
(a) Existing improved and primitive public trails shall be maintained and enhanced.
(b) Shoreline in private ownership should provide public access when feasible as
follows:
Page 75 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 54
(i) Easement for public access; and
(ii) Physical or visual public access when feasible and when mentioned in the
City’s public access plan, or other agencies’ management plan.
(c) Where public access is to be provided by dedication of public access easements
along the OHWM, the minimum width of such easements shall be 20 feet.
(d) The total width of trail, including shoulders, shall be 20 feet maximum or as
required by Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations.
(e) Pervious pavings are encouraged for all trails and are required for trail shoulders.
(f) Trails should make use of an existing constructed grade, such as those formed by
an abandoned rail grade, road, or utility when feasible.
(g) Trails shall be located, constructed, and maintained so as to avoid, to the maximum
extent possible, removal and other impacts to perennial native vegetation consistent with a
habitat management plan.
(h) Trails on private properties and not open for public use shall be up to five feet wide.
(8) Rights-of-Way, Easements, and Streets for Public Access.
(a) The City shall maintain public rights-of-way or easements as a means of retaining
public access on the shoreline. Proposed use, activity, or developments shall maintain
public access provided by public street ends, public utilities, and rights-of-way.
(b) The public easements required pursuant to this section, for the purpose of providing
access across or through the site to the OHWM, shall be maintained by the property owner
to provide for reasonable and safe public access to the OHWM.
(9) Where public access routes terminate, connections should be made with the nearest public
street unless determined by the Shoreline Administrator to be infeasible. Public access facilities
required for an approved or permitted use, activity, or development shall be completed prior to
occupancy and use of the site or operation of the activity. Public access shall make adequate
provisions, such as screening, buffer strips, fences, and signs, to prevent trespass upon adjacent
properties and to protect the value and enjoyment of adjacent or nearby private properties and
natural areas.
(10) Off-site public access may be permitted by the City where it results in an equal or greater
public benefit than on-site public access, or when on-site limitations of security, environment,
compatibility, or feasibility are present. Off-site public access may include, but is not limited to,
adequate access on public lands in proximity to the site, opportunity to increase public lands and
access with adjoining or proximate public area, enhancing a City-designated public property (e.g.,
Page 76 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 55
existing public recreation site, existing public access, road abutting a body of water, or similar) in
accordance with City standards, or other related measures.
(11) Signage.
(a) Signage to be approved by the Shoreline Administrator shall be conspicuously
installed along public access easements, trails, walkways, corridors, and other facilities to
indicate the public’s right of use and the hours of operation. Public access and interpretive
displays may be provided for publicly funded restoration projects where significant
ecological impacts are addressed. The proponent shall bear the responsibility for
establishing and maintaining signs.
(b) The Shoreline Administrator may require the proponent to post signage restricting
or controlling the public’s access to specific shoreline areas. The proponent shall bear the
responsibility for establishing and maintaining such signage.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.260.]
29.15.080 Flood hazard reduction.
(1) Development in floodplains shall avoid significantly or cumulatively increasing flood
hazards. Development shall be consistent with this SMP, as well as applicable guidelines of FEMA
and PMC 29.25.060, Flood Hazard Areas, and Chapter 24.20 PMC, Provisions for Flood Hazard
Protection.
(2) Existing structural flood hazard reduction measures, such as levees, may be repaired and
maintained as necessary to protect legal uses on the landward side of such structures. Increases in
height of an existing levee, with any associated increase in width, that may be needed to prevent a
reduction in the authorized level of protection of existing legal structures and uses, shall be
considered an element of repair and maintenance.
(3) Flood hazard reduction measures shall not result in channelization of normal stream flows,
interfere with natural hydraulic processes, such as channel migration, or undermine existing
structures or downstream banks.
(4) New Development and Subdivisions. Approve new development or subdivisions when it
can be reasonably foreseeable that the development or use would not require structural flood
hazard reduction measures within the floodway during the life of the development or use consistent
with the following (WAC 173-26-221(3)(c)(i)):
(a) Floodway. New development and subdivisions shall be subject to applicable
floodway regulations in PMC 29.25.060, Flood hazard areas, and Chapter 24.20 PMC,
Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection.
(5) New public and private structural flood hazard reduction measures shall be approved when
a scientific and engineering analysis demonstrates the following:
Page 77 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 56
(a) They are necessary to protect existing development;
(b) Nonstructural measures, such as setbacks, land use controls, wetland restoration,
dike removal, use or structure removal or relocation, biotechnical measures, and storm
water management programs are not feasible;
(c) Adverse impacts on ecological functions and priority species and habitats can be
successfully mitigated so as to ensure no net loss; and
(d) Appropriate vegetation conservation actions are undertaken consistent with PMC
29.15.050, Shoreline vegetation conservation.
(6) Flood hazard reduction measures shall be placed landward of associated wetlands and
designated shoreline buffers, except for actions that increase ecological functions, such as wetland
restoration, or when no other alternative location to reduce flood hazard to existing development
is feasible as determined by the Shoreline Administrator.
(7) New public structural flood hazard reduction measures, such as levees, shall dedicate and
improve public access pathways, unless public access improvements would cause unavoidable
health or safety hazards to the public, inherent and unavoidable security problems, unacceptable
and unmitigable significant adverse ecological impacts, unavoidable conflict with the proposed
use, or a cost that is disproportionate and unreasonable to the total long-term cost of the
development.
(8) In those instances when management of vegetation as required by this SMP conflicts with
vegetation provisions included in state, federal, or other flood hazard agency documents governing
City-authorized, legal flood hazard reduction measures, the vegetation requirements of this SMP
will not apply. However, the applicant shall submit documentation of these conflicting provisions
with any shoreline permit applications and shall comply with all other provisions of this section
and this SMP that are not strictly prohibited by the approving flood hazard agency.
(9) The removal of gravel or other riverbed material for flood-management purposes shall be
consistent with the PMC 29.20.050, Dredging and dredge material disposal, and PMC 29.20.090,
Mining, and be allowed only after a biological and physical conditions study shows extraction has
no effect on or provides a long-term benefit to flood hazard reduction, and does not result in a net
loss of ecological functions.
(10) Roads shall be located outside the floodway, except necessary crossings, which shall be
placed perpendicular to the water body as much as is physically feasible. New transportation
facilities shall be designed so the effective base flood storage volume of the floodplain is not
reduced. The applicant shall provide all necessary studies, reports, and engineering analyses,
which shall be subject to review and modification by the Shoreline Administrator. If proposed
transportation facilities effectively provide flood control, they shall comply with policies and
regulations of this section.
Page 78 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 57
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.270.]
Chapter 29.20
SHORELINE MODIFICATIONS AND USE REGULATIONS
Sections:
29.20.010 Agriculture.
29.20.020 Boating facilities.
29.20.030 Breakwater, jetties, groins, and weirs.
29.20.040 Commercial development.
29.20.050 Dredging and dredge material disposal.
29.20.060 Fill and excavation.
29.20.070 Industrial development.
29.20.080 In-stream structures.
29.20.090 Mining.
29.20.100 Piers and docks.
29.20.110 Recreational development.
29.20.120 Residential development.
29.20.130 Shoreline habitat and natural systems enhancement projects.
29.20.140 Shoreline stabilization.
29.20.150 Transportation –Trails, roads, and parking.
29.20.160 Utilities.
29.20.010 Agriculture.
(1) The SMP shall not require modification of or limit existing agricultural activities occurring
on agricultural lands consistent with RCW 90.58.065.
(2) For shoreline areas used for agriculture, new uses, activities, and development that are not
existing and ongoing, agriculture shall be subject to the following requirements:
(a) Such uses, activities, and development shall be allowed or permitted in a manner to
ensure maintenance of ecological functions and be consistent with the City’s land use plan.
(b) If the new use, activity, or development is more intensive than the existing land use,
no significant vegetation removal, development, or grading shall occur in the shoreline
buffer without associated mitigation, except as necessary to accommodate low-intensity
water-dependent uses and public access that sustains ecological functions.
(c) New agricultural lands created by diking, draining, or filling wetlands shall not be
allowed.
(d) Conversion of land for new agricultural use or activities that are not consistent with
PMC Title 25, Zoning, shall not be allowed.
Page 79 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 58
(3) A substantial development permit shall be required for all agricultural developments not
specifically exempted by the provisions of PMC 29.35.080(4)(e) except for agricultural
developments in shoreline residential environment designation where a shoreline special use
permit shall be required.
(4) SMP provisions shall apply in the following cases:
(a) New agricultural activities on land not meeting the definition of agricultural land;
(b) Expansion of agricultural activities on nonagricultural lands;
(c) Conversion of agricultural lands to other uses;
(d) Other development on agricultural land that does not meet the definition of
agricultural activities; and
(e) Agricultural development and uses not specifically exempted by the SMA.
(5) New nonagricultural activities proposed on agricultural lands shall be consistent with the
environment designation and the Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix Table 29.15.010, as well
as other applicable shoreline use standards, including PMC 29.20.040, Commercial or PMC
29.20.120, Residential.
(6) Agricultural uses and development shall be located and designed to ensure no net loss of
ecological functions and no significant adverse impact on other shoreline resources and values.
(7) New feedlots are prohibited in shoreline areas.
(8) Agricultural uses and activities shall prevent and control erosion of soils and bank materials
within shoreline areas. They shall minimize siltation, turbidity, pollution, and other environmental
degradation of watercourses and wetlands.
(9) Agricultural chemicals shall be applied in a manner consistent with BMPs for agriculture
and PMC 29.15.060(5).
(10) New agricultural activities shall not remove existing native or nonnative, but nonnoxious,
weed vegetation, except for noxious and invasive vegetation between all cropland or pasture areas
and adjacent waters or wetlands pursuant to the critical areas provisions of this SMP.
(11) Agricultural development shall conform to applicable state and federal policies and
regulations.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.300.]
Page 80 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 59
29.20.020 Boating facilities.
(1) General Requirements.
(a) All boating uses, development, and facilities shall protect the rights of navigation.
(b) Boating facilities shall be sited and designed to ensure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions and shall meet Washington State Department of Natural Resources
(WDNR) requirements and other state guidance if located in or over state-owned aquatic
lands.
(c) Boating facilities shall be located on stable shorelines in areas where:
(i) Such facilities will not adversely affect flood channel capacity or otherwise
create a flood hazard;
(ii) Water depths are adequate to minimize spoil disposal, filling, beach
enhancement, and other channel maintenance activities; and
(iii) Water depths are adequate to prevent the structure from grounding out at
the lowest low water or stoppers are installed to prevent grounding out.
(d) Boating facilities shall not be located:
(i) Where new dredging will be required; or
(ii) Where wave action caused by boating use would increase bank erosion
rates, unless no-wake zones are implemented at the facility.
(e) Boating uses and facilities shall be located far enough from public swimming
beaches and aquaculture harvest areas to alleviate any aesthetic or adverse impacts, safety
concerns, and potential use conflicts.
(f) In-water work shall be scheduled to protect biological productivity (including, but
not limited to, fish runs, spawning, and benthic productivity).
(g) Accessory uses at boating facilities shall be:
(i) Limited to water-oriented uses, including uses that provide physical or
visual shoreline access for substantial numbers of the general public; and
(ii) Located as far landward as possible, while still serving their intended
purposes.
(h) Parking and storage areas shall be landscaped or screened to provide visual and
noise buffering between adjacent dissimilar uses or scenic areas.
Page 81 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 60
(i) Boating facilities shall locate where access roads are adequate to handle the traffic
generated by the facility and shall be designed so that lawfully existing or planned public
shoreline access is not unnecessarily blocked, obstructed, or made dangerous.
(j) Joint-use moorage with 10 or more berths is regulated under this section as a marina
(subsection (3) of this section). Joint-use moorage with fewer than 10 berths is regulated
under this section as a dock or pier (see PMC 29.20.100, Piers and Docks).
(k) All marinas and public launch facilities shall provide at least portable restroom
facilities for boaters’ use that are clean, well lit, safe, and convenient for public use.
(l) Installation of boat waste disposal facilities, such as pump-outs and portable dump
stations, shall be required at all marinas and shall be provided at public boat launches to
the extent possible. The locations of such facilities shall be considered on an individual
basis in consultation with the Washington State Departments of Health, Ecology, WDNR,
Washington State Parks, and WDFW, as necessary.
(m) All utilities shall be placed at or below dock levels or below ground, as appropriate.
(n) When appropriate, marinas and boat launch facilities shall install public safety signs
that include the locations of fueling facilities, pump-out facilities, and locations for proper
waste disposal.
(o) Boating facilities shall be constructed of materials that will not adversely affect
water quality or aquatic plants and animals over the long-term. Materials used for
submerged portions, decking, and other components that may come in contact with water
shall be approved by applicable state agencies for use in water to avoid discharge of
pollutants from wave splash, rain, or runoff. Wood treated with creosote, copper chromium,
arsenic, pentachlorophenol, or other similarly toxic materials is prohibited for use in
moorage facilities.
(p) Boating facilities in waters providing a public drinking water supply shall be
constructed of untreated materials, such as untreated wood, approved plastic composites,
concrete, or steel (see PMC 29.15.060, Water quality, storm water, and nonpoint pollution).
(q) Vessels shall be restricted from extended mooring on waters of the state, except as
allowed by state regulations; and provided, that a lease or permission is obtained from the
state and impacts to navigation and public access are mitigated.
(2) Boat Launch Facilities.
(a) Public boat launch facilities may be allowed in areas where no launching
opportunities exist within close proximity of a site (within less than three miles distance
by road on a water body) or as mentioned in the Public Access Plan.
Page 82 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 61
(b) Boat launch and haul-out facilities, such as ramps, marine travel lifts and marine
railways, and minor accessory buildings, shall be designed and constructed in a manner
that minimizes adverse impacts on fluvial processes, biological functions, aquatic and
riparian habitats, water quality, navigation, and neighboring uses.
(c) Boat launch facilities shall be designed and constructed using methods/technology
that has been recognized and approved by state and federal resource agencies as the best
currently available.
(3) Marinas.
(a) Marinas shall be designed to:
(i) Provide flushing of all enclosed water areas;
(ii) Allow the free movement of aquatic life in shallow water areas; and
(iii) Avoid and minimize any interference with geohydraulic processes and
disruption of existing shore forms.
(b) Open pile or floating breakwater designs shall be used unless it can be demonstrated
that riprap or other solid construction would not result in any greater net impacts to
shoreline ecological functions, processes, fish passage, or shore features.
(c) Wet-moorage marinas shall locate a safe distance from domestic sewage or
industrial waste outfalls.
(d) To the maximum extent possible, marinas and accessory uses shall share parking
facilities.
(e) New marina development shall provide public access amenities, such as
viewpoints, interpretive displays, and public access to accessory water-enjoyment uses
(e.g., restaurants).
(f) If a marina is to include gas and oil handling facilities, such facilities shall be
separate from main centers of activity in order to minimize the fire and water pollution
hazards and to facilitate fire and pollution control. Marinas shall have adequate facilities
and procedures for fuel handling and storage, and the containment, recovery, and
mitigation of spilled petroleum, sewage, and other potentially harmful or hazardous
materials and toxic products.
(g) The marina operator shall be responsible for the collection and dumping of sewage,
solid waste, and petroleum waste.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.320.]
Page 83 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 62
29.20.030 Breakwater, jetties, groins, and weirs.
(1) Breakwaters shall be allowed in environments defined in Table 29.15.010, Shoreline Use
and Modification Matrix, with a shoreline special use permit.
(2) New, expanded, or replacement groins and weirs shall only be permitted if the applicant
demonstrates that the proposed groin or weir will not result in a net loss of shoreline ecological
functions and the structure is necessary for water-dependent uses, public access, shoreline
stabilization, or other specific public purposes.
(3) Groins and weirs shall require a special use permit, except when such structures are
installed to protect or restore ecological functions, such as installation of groins that may eliminate
or minimize the need for hard shoreline stabilization.
(4) Groins and weirs shall be located, designed, constructed, and operated consistent with
mitigation sequencing principles, including avoiding critical areas, as provided in PMC 29.15.040,
Environmental protection.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.330.]
29.20.040 Commercial development.
(1) Water-dependent commercial development shall be given priority over nonwater-
dependent commercial uses within shoreline environments. Secondarily, water-related and water-
oriented uses shall be given priority over nonwater-oriented commercial uses.
(2) Nonwater-oriented commercial uses shall be allowed if they can demonstrate at least one
or more of the following:
(a) The commercial use is part of a mixed -use project that includes water-dependent
uses and provides a significant public benefit with respect to the objectives of the SMA.
(b) Navigability is severely limited at the proposed site, including opportunities for
nonmotorized boating or other water-oriented uses.
(c) The commercial use is physically separated from the shoreline by another property,
public right-of-way, or levee.
(d) The commercial use is farther upland than 200 feet from the OHWM; therefore, a
water-oriented use is not a viable option.
(3) Nonwater-oriented uses, including, but not limited to, residential uses, may be located with
water-oriented commercial uses; provided, that:
(a) The mixed-use project includes one or more water-dependent uses.
Page 84 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 63
(b) Water-dependent commercial uses, as well as other water-oriented commercial
uses, have preferential locations along the shoreline.
(c) The underlying zoning district permits residential uses together with commercial
uses.
(d) Public access is provided and/or ecological restoration is provided as a public
benefit.
(4) Review Criteria. The City shall utilize the following information in its review of all
commercial development applications:
(a) Whether there is a water-oriented aspect of the proposed commercial use or activity
when it is located within 200 feet of the OHWM;
(b) Whether the proposed commercial use is consistent with the Shoreline Use and
Modification Matrix (Table 29.15.010);
(c) Whether the application has the ability to enhance compatibility with the shoreline
environment and adjacent uses;
(d) Whether adequate provisions are made for public and private visual and physical
shoreline access; and
(e) Whether the application makes adequate provisions to prevent adverse
environmental impacts and provide for shoreline ecological or critical area mitigation,
where appropriate.
(5) Commercial development shall be designed and maintained in a manner compatible with
the character and features of surrounding areas. Developments are encouraged to incorporate low-
impact development techniques into new and existing projects and integrate architectural and
landscape elements that recognize the river and lake environments. The City may prescribe and
modify project dimensions, screening standards, setbacks, or operation intensities to achieve this
purpose.
(6) Eating and drinking facilities and lodging facilities shall be oriented to provide views to
the waterfront, when such view is available from the site.
(7) Commercial uses shall provide for public access as a condition of approval, unless such
public access is demonstrated by the proponent to be infeasible or inappropriate for the shoreline
pursuant to PMC 29.15.070, Public access.
(8) Commercial uses shall provide for suitable measures to rehabilitate and enhance the
shoreline ecology as a condition of approval.
Page 85 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 64
(9) Nonwater-oriented commercial uses shall not be allowed over water in any shoreline
environment.
(10) All commercial loading and service areas shall be located upland or away from the
shoreline. Provisions shall be made to screen such areas with walls, fences, and landscaping and
to minimize aesthetic impacts.
(11) The storage of potentially hazardous or dangerous substances or wastes is prohibited in the
floodway or within 200 feet of the OHWM, whichever boundary extends farthest landward.
(12) Development shall be located, designed, and constructed in a manner that ensures no net
loss of shoreline ecological functions and without significant adverse impacts on other preferred
land uses and public access features.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.340.]
29.20.050 Dredging and dredge material disposal.
(1) Dredging.
(a) New dredging shall be permitted only where it is demonstrated that the proposed
water-dependent or water-related uses will not result in significant or ongoing adverse
impacts to water quality, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and other critical
areas, flood holding capacity, natural drainage and water circulation patterns, significant
plant communities, prime agricultural land, and public access to shorelines, unless one or
more of these impacts cannot be avoided. When such impacts are unavoidable, they shall
be minimized and mitigated such that they result in no net loss of shoreline ecological
functions.
(b) Dredging and dredge disposal shall be prohibited on or in archaeological sites that
are listed on the National Register of Historic Places and the Washington Heritage Register
until such time that they have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate agency.
(c) Dredging techniques that cause minimum dispersal and broadcast of bottom
material shall be used, and only the amount of dredging necessary shall be permitted.
(d) Dredging shall be permitted only:
(i) For navigation or navigational access;
(ii) In conjunction with a water-dependent use of water bodies or adjacent
shoreline areas;
(iii) As part of an approved habitat improvement project;
Page 86 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 65
(iv) To improve water flow or water quality; provided, that all dredged material
shall be contained and managed so as to prevent it from re-entering the water; or
(v) In conjunction with a bridge, navigational structure, or wastewater
treatment facility for which there is a documented public need and where other
feasible sites or routes do not exist.
(e) Dredging for fill is prohibited except where the material is necessary for restoration
of shoreline ecological functions.
(2) Dredge Material Disposal.
(a) Upland dredge material disposal within shoreline jurisdiction is discouraged. In the
limited circumstances when it is allowed, it will be permitted under the following
conditions:
(i) Shoreline ecological functions and processes will be preserved, restored, or
enhanced, including protection of surface and groundwater;
(ii) Erosion, sedimentation, floodwaters, or runoff will not increase adverse
impacts on shoreline ecological functions and processes or property; and
(iii) The site will ultimately be suitable for a use allowed by this SMP.
(b) Dredge material disposal shall not occur in wetlands, except as authorized by
special use permit as part of a shoreline restoration project.
(c) Dredge material disposal within areas assigned an aquatic environment designation
may be approved only when authorized by applicable agencies, which may include the
USACE pursuant to Section 404 (Clean Water Act) permits, WDFW’s hydraulic project
approval, and/or the dredged material management program of the WDNR; and when one
of the following conditions apply:
(i) Land disposal is infeasible, less consistent with this SMP, or prohibited by
law; or
(ii) Disposal as part of a program to restore or enhance shoreline ecological
functions and processes is not feasible.
(d) Dredge materials approved for disposal within areas assigned an Aquatic
environment designation shall comply with the following conditions:
(i) Aquatic habitat will be protected, restored, or enhanced;
(ii) Adverse effects on water quality or biologic resources from contaminated
materials will be mitigated;
Page 87 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 66
(iii) Shifting and dispersal of dredge material will be minimal; and
(iv) Water quality will not be adversely affected.
(e) When required by the Shoreline Administrator, revegetation of land disposal sites
shall occur as soon as feasible in order to retard wind and water erosion and to restore the
wildlife habitat value of the site. Native species shall be used in the revegetation.
(f) Dredge material disposal operating periods and hours shall be limited to those
stipulated by the WDFW and hours from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday,
except in time of emergency as authorized by the Shoreline Administrator. Provisions for
buffers at land disposal or transfer sites, in order to protect public safety and other lawful
interests and to avoid adverse impacts, shall be required.
(3) Submittal Requirements. The following information shall be required for all dredging
applications:
(a) A description of the purpose of the proposed dredging and analysis of compliance
with the policies and regulations of this SMP.
(b) A detailed description of the existing physical character, shoreline geomorphology,
and biological resources provided by the area proposed to be dredged, including:
(i) A site plan map outlining the perimeter of the proposed dredge area,
including the existing bathymetry (water depths that indicate the topography of
areas below the OHWM), and having data points at a minimum of two-foot depth
increments.
(ii) A critical areas detailed study according to PMC 29.25.020(10).
(iii) A mitigation plan, if necessary, to address any id entified adverse impacts
on ecological functions or processes.
(iv) Information on stability of areas adjacent to proposed dredging and spoils
disposal areas.
(v) A detailed description of the physical, chemical, and biological
characteristics of the dredge materials to be removed, including:
(A) Physical analysis of material to be dredged (e.g., material
composition and amount, grain size, organic materials present, and source
of material).
Page 88 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 67
(B) Chemical analysis of material to be dredged (e.g., volatile solids,
chemical oxygen demand, grease and oil content, and mercury, lead, and
zinc content).
(C) Biological analysis of material to be dredged.
(c) A description of the method of materials removal, including facilities for settlement
and movement.
(d) Dredging procedure, including the length of time it will take to complete dredging,
method of dredging, and amount of materials removed.
(e) Frequency and quantity of project maintenance dredging.
(f) Detailed plans for dredge spoil disposal, including specific land disposal sites and
relevant information on the disposal site, including, but not limited to:
(i) Dredge material disposal area;
(ii) Physical characteristics, including location, topography, existing drainage
patterns, and surface and groundwater;
(iii) Size and capacity of disposal site;
(iv) Means of transportation to the disposal site;
(v) Proposed dewatering and stabilization of dredged material;
(vi) Methods of controlling erosion and sedimentation; and
(vii) Future use of the site and conformance with land use policies and
regulations.
(g) Total estimated initial dredge volume.
(h) Plan for disposal of maintenance spoils for at least a 20-year period, if applicable.
(i) Hydraulic modeling studies sufficient to identify existing geohydraulic patterns
and probable effects of dredging.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.350.]
29.20.060 Fill and excavation.
(1) Fill and excavation waterward of the OHWM, except to support ecological restoration,
requires a special use permit and may be permitted only when:
Page 89 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 68
(a) In conjunction with water-dependent or public access uses allowed by this SMP;
(b) In conjunction with a bridge, levee, or transportation facility of statewide
significance, for which there is a demonstrated public need and where no feasible upland
sites, design solutions, or routes exist;
(c) In conjunction with implementation of an interagency environmental cleanup plan
to clean up and dispose of contaminated sediments;
(d) Disposal of dredged material considered suitable under, and conducted in
accordance with, the Washington State Dredged Material Management Program; or
(e) In conjunction with any other environmental restoration or enhancement project.
(2) Waterward of the OHWM, pile or pier supports shall be utilized whenever feasible in
preference to fills. Fills for approved road development in floodways or wetlands shall be
permitted only if pile or pier supports are proven not feasible.
(3) Fill upland and waterward of the OHWM, including in nonwatered side channels, shall be
permitted only where it is demonstrated that the proposed action will not:
(a) Result in significant ecological damage to water quality, fish, and/or wildlife
habitat;
(b) Adversely alter natural drainage and circulation patterns, currents, or river flows,
or significantly reduce flood water capacities;
(c) Alter geomorphic or hydrologic processes; and
(d) Significantly reduce public access to the shoreline or significantly interfere with
shoreline recreational uses.
(4) Fills are prohibited in the floodway, except when approved by special use permit and where
required in conjunction with uses allowed by this SMP.
(5) Fills are allowed in floodplains outside of the floodway only where they would not alter
the hydrologic characteristics or flood storage capacity, or inhibit channel migration that would,
in turn, increase flood hazard or other damage to life or property and are consistent with FEMA
standards and Chapter 24.20 PMC, Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection, and PMC 29.25.060,
Flood hazard areas.
(6) Fill shall be of the minimum amount and extent necessary to accomplish the purpose of the
fill.
Page 90 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 69
(7) Excavation waterward of the OHWM or within wetlands shall be considered dredging for
purposes of this SMP.
(8) Fills or excavation shall not be located where shore stabilization will be necessary to
protect materials placed or removed. Disturbed areas shall be immediately stabilized and
revegetated, as applicable.
(9) Fills, beach development or nourishment, and excavation shall be designed to blend
physically and visually with existing topography whenever possible, so as not to interfere with
long-term appropriate use, including lawful access and enjoyment of scenery.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.360.]
29.20.070 Industrial development.
(1) Water-dependent industrial development shall be given priority over nonwater-dependent
commercial uses within shoreline environments. Secondarily, water-related and water-oriented
uses shall be given priority over nonwater-oriented commercial uses.
(2) Nonwater-oriented industrial uses shall be allowed if they can demonstrate one or more of
the following:
(a) The industrial use is part of a mixed-use project that includes water-dependent uses
and provides a significant public benefit with respect to the objectives of the SMA.
(b) Navigability is severely limited at the proposed site, including opportunities for
nonmotorized boating or other water-oriented uses.
(c) The industrial use is physically separated from the shoreline by another property,
public right-of-way, or levee.
(d) The industrial use is farther upland than 200 feet from the OHWM; therefore, a
water-oriented use is not a viable option.
(3) Where industrial use is proposed for location on land in public ownership, public access
should be required unless such public access is demonstrated by the proponent to be infeasible or
inappropriate for the shoreline pursuant to PMC 29.15.070, Public access.
(4) Industrial uses shall provide for suitable measures to rehabilitate and enhance the shoreline
ecology as a condition of approval.
(5) Nonwater-oriented industrial uses shall not be allowed over water in any shoreline
environment.
(6) All industrial loading and service areas shall be located upland or away from the shoreline,
except when loading services are water-dependent, such as barge facilities. Provisions shall be
Page 91 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 70
made to screen upland loading areas with walls, fences, and landscaping and to minimize aesthetic
impacts.
(7) The new storage of potentially hazardous or dangerous substances or wastes is prohibited
in the floodway or within 200 feet of the OHWM, whichever boundary extends farthest landward.
(8) Industrial development will be located, designed, or constructed in a manner that ensures
no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and such that it does not have significant adverse
impacts to other shoreline resources and values.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.370.]
29.20.080 In-stream structures.
(1) In-stream structures are those structures placed by humans within a stream or river
waterward of the OHWM that either cause or have the potential to cause water impoundment or
the diversion, obstruction, or modification of water flow. In-stream structures may include those
for hydroelectric generation, irrigation, water supply, flood control, transportation, utility service
transmission, structures primarily intended for fisheries management, or other purposes. Docks,
piers, and marinas are not regulated as in-stream structures in this section. See PMC 29.20.150,
Transportation – Trails, roads, and parking, and PMC 29.20.160, Utilities, for regulations
governing road and utility crossings of streams.
(2) General.
(a) The location, planning, and design of in-stream structures shall be compatible with
the following:
(i) The full range of public interests; existing agricultural activities; water
diversion operations, maintenance, and facility upgrade activities; and providing
for public access to shoreline waters, desire for protection from floods, and need
for preservation of historic and cultural resources.
(ii) Protection and preservation of ecosystem-wide processes and ecological
functions, including, but not limited to, fish and wildlife, with special emphasis on
protecting and restoring priority habitats and species and water resources and
hydrogeological processes within the context of the hydrology and water
management effects of the Columbia and Snake river operations and McNary Pool
conditions, as applicable.
(b) New structures shall be designed, located, and constructed consistent with
mitigation sequencing principles in PMC 29.15.040, Environmental protection, and as
otherwise limited by floodplain regulations found in PMC 29.15.080, Flood hazard
reduction, and PMC 29.25.060, Flood hazard areas.
Page 92 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 71
(c) New structures shall be designed and located to minimize removal of riparian
vegetation and, if applicable, to return flow to the stream in as short a distance as possible.
(d) In-stream structures shall provide for adequate upstream and downstream migration
of resident fish, as applicable, and shall not adversely affect salmonid fish species or
adversely modify salmonid fish habitat, as applicable.
(e) Utilities and transmission lines shall be located so as to minimize obstruction or
degradation of views and comply with applicable provisions of PMC 29.20.160, Utilities.
(f) Mitigation shall be required of the proponent for the loss of ecologi cal functions
and processes pursuant to PMC 29.15.040, Environmental protection, and Chapter 29.25
PMC, Critical Areas. No net loss in function, value, or acreage shall occur from such
development.
(3) Submittal Requirements. In addition to the standard requirements listed in PMC 29.35.040,
Application requirements, all permit applications for in-stream structures shall contain, at a
minimum, the following additional information:
(a) A site suitability analysis, which provides sufficient justification for the proposed
site; the analysis must fully address alternative sites for the proposed development.
(b) Proposed location and design of primary and accessory structures, transmission
equipment, utility corridors, and access/service roads.
(c) A plan that describes the extent and location of vegetation which is proposed to be
removed to accommodate the proposed facility, and any site revegetation plans required
by this SMP.
(d) A hydraulic analysis prepared by a licensed professional engineer that sufficiently
describes the project’s effects on streamway hydraulics, including potential increases in
base flood elevation, changes in stream velocity, and the potential for redirection of the
normal flow of the affected stream.
(e) A hydrologic analysis that analyzes the project’s effects on ecological processes,
including delivery and rate of water and sediment, geomorphology, and recruitment of
organic material.
(f) Biological resource inventory and analysis that sufficiently describes the project’s
effects on fish and wildlife resources, prepared by a qualified professional as defined in
Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas.
(g) Provision for erosion control, protection of water quality, and protection of fish and
wildlife resources during construction.
Page 93 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 72
(h) Long-term management plans that describe in sufficient detail the provisions for
protection of in-stream resources during construction and operation; the plan shall include
means for monitoring its success.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.380.]
29.20.090 Mining.
(1) Mining shall be prohibited waterward of the OHWM.
(2) Mining facilities shall be located within shoreline jurisdiction only when no feasible sites
are available outside shoreline jurisdiction and only after the applicant has demonstrated
compliance with the mitigation sequencing requirements of PMC 29.15.040, Environmental
Protection.
(3) Mining in shoreline jurisdiction shall only be approved when the material proposed to be
extracted is only available in a shoreline location. This determination shall be based on an
evaluation of geologic factors, such as the distribution and availability of mineral resources for
that jurisdiction, the need for such mineral resources, and economic, transportation, and land use
factors. This demonstration may rely on analysis or studies prepared for purposes of the
Comprehensive Plan’s designations and may be integrated with any relevant environmental review
conducted under SEPA, Chapter 43.21C RCW, or otherwise be shown in a manner consistent with
RCW 90.58.100(1) and WAC 173-26-201(2)(a), as amended.
(4) Mining facilities and associated activities shall be designed and located to prevent loss of
ecological function.
(5) Application for permits for mining operations shall be accompanied by operation plans,
reclamation plans, and analysis of environmental impacts sufficient to make a determination as to
whether the project will result in net loss of shoreline ecological functions and processes during
the course of mining and after reclamation, and how impacts will be mitigated to achieve no net
loss of these functions. Creation, restoration, or enhancement of habitat for priority species and
the future productivity of the site may be considered in determining no net loss of ecological
functions.
(6) Mining proposals must be coordinated and compliant with state Surface Mining
Reclamation Act requirements (Chapter 78.44 RCW, Chapter 332-18 WAC).
(7) Preference shall be given to mining uses that result in the creation, restoration, or
enhancement of habitat for priority species. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.390.]
29.20.100 Piers and docks.
(1) All boating uses, development, and facilities shall protect the rights of navigation and
demonstrate no net loss of ecological functions, including providing on-site and off-site mitigation,
as applicable.
Page 94 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 73
(2) Shared moorage serving single-family use consisting of docks and piers with more than
four berths, commercial moorage available to the general public, and moorage related to clubs or
other groups not associated with a particular residential development are regulated as boating
facilities under PMC 29.20.020, Boating facilities.
(3) Docks and piers with four or fewer berths or any number of mooring buoys are regulated
under this section.
(4) Piers and docks shall avoid:
(a) Areas where shoreline modification is required for approach and other upland
facilities.
(b) Locations where they would adversely impact upland riparian or nearshore habitat
for aquatic species.
(c) Locations where they would adversely affect flood channel capacity or create a
flood hazard.
(d) Locations where water depths for vessels are not adequate without dredging.
(5) Piers and docks, except those accessory to single-family residences, shall provide public
access in accordance with PMC 29.15.070, Public access, and shall be located and designed such
that existing public access to public shorelines is not obstructed nor made hazardous.
(6) All in- and overwater structures shall be constructed of materials that will not adversely
affect water quality or aquatic plants and animals during the long-term. Wood treated with
creosote, pentachlorophenol, or other similarly toxic materials is prohibited. Docks shall be
constructed of untreated materials, such as untreated wood, approved plastic composites, concrete,
or steel.
(7) Vessels shall be restricted from extended mooring on waters of the state, except as allowed
by state regulations and unless a lease or other permission is obtained from the state and impacts
to navigation and public access are mitigated.
(8) Boat Launches.
(a) Boat launches accessory to single-family and multifamily residential uses are
prohibited.
(b) Private boat launches shall be allowed only for water-dependent uses and marinas
and only when it is demonstrated that public boat launches will not feasibly serve the use.
Rail and track systems shall be preferred over concrete ramps.
Page 95 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 74
(c) New public boat launches for general public use or expansion of public boat
launches by adding launch lanes shall demonstrate that:
(i) Water depths are adequate to avoid the need for dredging and eliminate or
minimize potential loss of shoreline ecological functions or other shoreline
resources from offshore or foreshore channel dredging.
(ii) Adjacent residential properties will not be adversely affected by adverse
proximity impacts, such as noise, light and glare, or scale and aesthetic impacts.
Fencing or landscape areas may be required to provide a visual screen.
(iii) Exterior lighting will not adversely impact aquatic species.
(iv) Adequate provisions are made for restroom, sewage, and solid waste
disposal facilities in compliance with applicable health regulations.
(v) Access and parking shall not produce traffic hazards, shall not result in
excessive noise or other impacts, shall minimize traffic impacts on nearby street s,
and shall include adequate parking for boat trailers. Parking on public streets may
be allowed for peak periods if it is demonstrated that such parking will not
adversely impact through traffic or residential uses.
(9) New moorage to serve a single-family residence may be allowed only if:
(a) It is consistent with the USACE McNary Pool Management Plan.
(b) An applicant demonstrates that existing facilities (boat launches and public and
private marinas) are not reasonably available to meet demand.
(c) The lot does not have access to shared moorage in an existing subdivision, and there
is no homeowners association or other corporate entity capable of developing shared
moorage.
(d) In cases where a new dock or pier is approved, the City may require an agreement
to share with nearby residences with water frontage and provide for expansion to serve
such additional users.
(10) A dock or pier serving a single-family residence shall meet the following standards:
(a) Piers and Ramps.
(i) To prevent damage to shallow-water habitat, piers and ramps shall extend
at least 40 feet perpendicular from the OHWM. In some instances and sites, it may
not be practical to extend a ramp 40 feet from OHWM (for instance, where this
could conflict with navigation). The City may grant exceptions on a case-by-case
Page 96 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 75
basis depending on documentation of specific limitations that exist and in
coordination with other permitting agencies.
(ii) Piers and ramps shall be no more than four feet in width.
(iii) The bottom of either the pier or landward edge of the ramp shall be elevated
at least two feet above the plane of OHWM.
(iv) Grating shall cover the entire surface area (100 percent) of the pier or ramp.
The open area of grating shall be at least 50 percent, as rated by the manufacturer.
(v) Skirting shall not be placed on piers, ramps, or floats. Protective bumper
material will be allowed along the outside edge of the float, as long as the material
does not extend below the bottom edge of the float frame or impede light
penetration.
(vi) Shoreline concrete anchors must be placed at least 10 feet landward from
the OHWM and shall be sized no larger than four feet wide by four feet long, unless
otherwise approved by the City, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) Fisheries, USACE, and WDFW. The maximum anchor height shall be
only what is necessary to elevate the bottom of either the pier or landward edge of
the ramp at least two feet above the plane of OHWM. The intent of this criterion is
to limit impacts to riparian vegetation along the shoreline. The City may grant
exceptions from the 10-foot landward requirement if site conditions warrant.
Exceptions shall be made on a case-by-case basis and based on documentation of a
specific limitation that exists and in coordination with other permitting agencies.
(b) Preservatives.
(i) The dock shall be built with materials that do not leach preservatives or
other materials.
(ii) No treated wood of any kind shall be used on any overwater structure (float,
pier, or ramp).
(iii) No paint, stain, or preservative shall be applied to the overwater structure.
(c) General.
(i) No electricity shall be provided to, or on, the overwater structure.
(ii) No boat lifts or watercraft lifts (e.g., Jet Ski lifts) of any type will be placed
on, or in addition to, the overwater structure. The City may grant exceptions on a
case-by-case basis in coordination with other permitting agencies if the applicant
can demonstrate that the proposed boat lift meets the intent of the criteria to
Page 97 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 76
minimize structure, maximize light penetration, and maximize depth. However,
these structures must meet the size criteria of the plan (total 160 square feet).
(iii) Shoreline armoring (e.g., bulkheads, riprap, and retaining walls) shall not
occur in association with installation of the overwater structure.
(iv) Construction of the overwater structure shall be completed during the in -
water work window (November 1st to February 28th).
(d) Piling and Float Anchors.
(i) Piling shall not exceed eight inches in diameter. The intent of this criterion
is not to require existing pilings to be removed, cut, or capped, but to place limits
on the size of new pilings. The City may grant exceptions to allow for larger pilings
on a case-by-case basis and in coordination with other permitting agencies in areas
where safety considerations merit it.
(ii) Pilings shall be spaced at least 18 feet apart on the same side of any
component of the overwater structure. The pier/ramp and float are separate
components.
(iii) Each overwater structure shall utilize no more than four piles total for the
entire project. A combination of two piles and four helical anchors may be used in
place of four piles.
(iv) All pilings shall be fitted with devices to prevent perching by piscivorous
(fish-eating) birds.
(v) Submerged float anchors will be constructed from concrete and shall be
horizontally compressed in form, by a factor of five or more, for a minimum profile
above the stream bed (the horizontal length and width will be at least five times the
vertical height). A helical screw anchor may be utilized where substrate allows. The
owner shall be responsible for demonstrating feasibility and for proper installation
such that anchor displacement does not occur.
(vi) No in-water fill material will be allowed, with the exception of pilings and
float anchors. (Note: uncured concrete or its by-products shall not be allowed.)
(e) Floats.
(i) Float components shall not exceed the dimensions of eight by 20 feet, or an
aggregate total of 160 square feet, for all float components.
(ii) Flotation materials shall be permanently encapsulated to prevent breakup
into small pieces and dispersal in water (e.g., rectangular float tubs).
Page 98 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 77
(iii) Grating shall cover 100 percent of the surface area of the float(s). The open
area of the grating shall be no less than 50 percent, as rated by the manufacturer.
(iv) Functional grating will cover no less than 50 percent of the float.
(v) Floats shall not be located in shallow-water habitat where they could ground
or impede the passage or rearing of any salmonid life stage.
(vi) Nothing shall be placed on the overwater structure that will reduce natural
light penetration through the structure.
(vii) Floats shall be positioned at least 40 feet horizontally from the OHWM and
no more than 100 feet from the OHWM, as measured from the landward-most edge
of the float. Adjustments to this requirement may be made on an individual basis
where strict compliance with this standard may present safety issues or be excessive
for site conditions.
(viii) Project construction shall cease during high-flow conditions that could
result in inundation of the project area, except for efforts to avoid or mi nimize
resource damage.
(11) Shared residential docks and piers shall generally meet the standards for single-family
docks above, except that the number of floats and the size of piers and other facilities may be
increased to serve additional slips to provide one moorage space per residence served.
(12) Docks and piers shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from side property lines, except
that joint-use facilities may be located closer to, or upon, a side property line when agreed to by
contract or covenant with the owners of the affected properties. This agreement shall be recorded
with the County Auditor and a copy filed with the shoreline permit application.
(13) Moorage Related to Subdivisions.
(a) New subdivisions and short plats shall contain a restriction on the face of the plat
prohibiting individual docks. A site for community or shared moorage shall be designated
on the plat and owned in undivided interest by property owners within the subdivision.
Shared moorage facilities shall be available to lots with water frontage in the subdivision.
The overwater area of the dock shall be made available to other lots and the public for
community access and may be required to provide public access depending on the scale of
the facility.
(b) Approval of a shared moorage for a subdivision shall be subject to the following
criteria:
(i) There is no reasonably available public or private moorage that can serve
the moorage needs of the residences or the subdivision.
Page 99 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 78
(ii) Shared moorage to serve new development shall be limited to the amount
of moorage needed to serve lots with water frontage. One moorage space per lot
may not be presumed.
(iii) The size of a dock must consider the use of mooring buoys for some or all
moorage needs and the use of all or part of the dock to allow tender access to
mooring buoys.
(iv) Public access shall be provided in all shared docks utilizing public aquatic
lands that accommodate five or more vessels.
(c) If a community or shared dock is not developed at the time of subdivision, a
community association shall be established with the authority to levy assessments within
the subdivision to construct and maintain a community dock in the future. The failure of a
subdivision to develop a community or shared dock shall not affect the prohibition on
individual docks.
(14) Multifamily residences, hotels, motels, and other commercial developments proposing to
provide moorage facilities shall meet the criteria for a marina. Use of the moorage must be open
to the general public on the same basis as residents or occupants and shall provide public access.
If approved, no more than one joint use moorage facility may be provided for a parcel or
development.
(15) Applications for docks or piers serving single commercial or industrial enterprises shall
demonstrate that:
(a) The facility serves a water-dependent use;
(b) The facility is the minimum size required to serve the proposed use; provided, that
provisions for expansion or future joint use may be provided;
(c) The facility minimizes impacts to the extent feasible. Where impacts are
unavoidable, the facility mitigates impacts to navigation, aquatic habitat, upland habitat,
public access to the water for recreation, fishing and similar use, and public access to
publicly accessible lands below the OHWM.
(16) Commercial or industrial moorage facilities shall demonstrate that:
(a) The dock or pier shall be the minimum length required to serve the use.
(b) Access from the shore to piers or floats shall minimize water cover in order to
minimize impacts to shallow-water habitat.
(c) Piers and ramps shall be elevated to provide the maximum feasible light
penetration.
Page 100 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 79
(d) Grating, or clear translucent material, shall be utilized to the maximum extent
feasible to provide light penetration.
(e) Floats shall be constructed and attached so they do not ground out on the substrate.
(f) Pile spacing shall be the maximum feasible to minimize shading and avoid a wall
effect that would block or baffle wave patterns, currents, littoral drift, or movement of
aquatic life forms, or result in structure damage from driftwood impact or entrapment.
(g) Pile diameter shall be minimized while meeting structural requirements.
(h) Covered structures may be permitted only to serve a water-dependent use where it
is demonstrated that adequate upland sites are not feasible and the area covered is the
minimum necessary to serve the use.
(17) Barge terminals are a particular use that can include docks, piers, and industrial moorage.
These facilities must demonstrate those items as provided in subsection (16) of this section, but
the SMP recognizes that barge terminals require specific development regulations, including
hardening of the shoreline, dredging, and no setback areas.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.400.]
29.20.110 Recreational development.
(1) General Preferences.
(a) Recreational uses and facilities shall include features that relate to access,
enjoyment, and use of the City’s shorelines.
(b) Both passive and active shoreline recreation uses are allowed.
(c) Water-oriented recreational uses and activities are preferred in shoreline
jurisdiction. Water-dependent recreational uses shall be preferred as a first priority and
water-related and water-enjoyment recreational uses as a second priority.
(d) Existing passive recreational opportunities, including nature appreciation,
nonmotorized trails, public education regarding shoreline ecological functions and
processes, environmental interpretation, and native habitat protection, shall be maintained.
Opportunities incorporating educational and interpretive information shall be included in
design and operation of recreation facilities and nature trails when feasible.
(e) Preference shall be given to the development and enhancement of public access to
the shoreline to increase fishing, boating, and other water-relatedenjoyment recreational
opportunities.
(2) General Performance Standards.
Page 101 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 80
(a) The potential adverse impacts of all recreational uses shall be mitigated, and
adequate provisions for shoreline rehabilitation shall be made part of any proposed
recreational use or development to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological function.
(b) Sites with fragile and unique shoreline conditions, such as high-quality wetlands
and wildlife habitats, shall be used only for nonintensive recreation activities, such as trails,
viewpoints, interpretive signage, and similar passive and low-impact facilities that result
in no net loss of shoreline ecological function, and do not require the construction and
placement of permanent structures.
(c) For proposed recreation developments that require the use of fertilizers, pesticides,
or other toxic chemicals, the proponent shall specify the BMPs to be used to prevent these
applications and resultant leachate from entering adjacent waters.
(d) Recreational developments shall be located and designed to preserve, enhance, or
create scenic views and vistas.
(e) In approving shoreline recreational developments, the Shoreline Administrator
shall ensure that the development will maintain, enhance, or restore desirable shoreline
features, including unique and fragile areas, scenic views, and aesthetic values. The
Shoreline Administrator may, therefore, adjust or prescribe project dimensions, on-site
location of project components, intensity of use, screening, lighting, parking, and setback
requirements.
(3) Signs indicating the public’s right to access shoreline areas shall be installed and
maintained in conspicuous locations at all points of access.
(4) Recreational developments shall provide facilities for nonmotorized access to the
shoreline, such as pedestrian and bicycle paths, and equestrian access, as applicable. New
motorized vehicle access shall be located and managed to protect riparian, wetlands, and shrub-
steppe habitat functions and value.
(5) Proposals for recreational developments shall include a landscape plan indicating how
native, self-sustaining vegetation is incorporated into the proposal to maintain ecological
functions. The removal of on-site native vegetation shall be limited to the minimum necessary for
the development of permitted structures or facilities and shall be consistent with provisions of
PMC 29.15.050, Shoreline vegetation conservation, and Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas.
(6) Accessory uses and support facilities, such as maintenance facilities, utilities, and other
nonwater-oriented uses shall be consolidated and located in upland areas outside shoreline,
wetland, and riparian buffers unless such facilities, utilities, and uses are allowed in shoreline
buffers based on the regulations of this SMP.
(7) The placement of picnic tables, playground apparatus, and other similar minor components
within the floodways shall be permitted; provided, that such structures are located and installed in
such a manner as to prevent them from being swept away during a flood event.
Page 102 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 81
(8) Recreational facilities shall make adequate provisions, such as screening, landscaping
buffer strips, fences, and signs, to prevent trespass on adjacent properties and to protect the value
and enjoyment of adjacent or nearby private properties and natural areas, as applicable.
(9) Recreational facilities or structures are only allowed to be built over water when they
provide public access or facilitate a water-dependent use and shall be the minimum size necessary
to accommodate the permitted activity.
(10) Recreational developments shall make adequate provisions for:
(a) On-site and off-site access and, where appropriate, equestrian access;
(b) Appropriate water supply and waste disposal methods; and
(c) Security and fire protection.
(11) Structures associated with recreational development shall not exceed 35 feet in height,
except as noted in PMC 29.15.020, Development standards, when such structures document that
the height above 35 feet will not obstruct the view of a substantial number of adjoining residences.
(12) Recreational development shall minimize effective impervious surfaces in shoreline
jurisdiction and incorporate low-impact development techniques. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970
§ 29.01.410.]
29.20.120 Residential development.
(1) Single-family residential development is a preferred use when it is developed in a manner
consistent with SMP provisions.
(2) Residential development shall be located and constructed to result in no net loss of
shoreline ecological function.
(3) Lots for residential use shall have a maximum density consistent with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations.
(4) Accessory uses and structures shall be located outside of the riparian buffer, unless the
structure is or supports a water-dependent use. Storage structures to support water-related uses are
not water-dependent uses, and therefore, shall be located outside of the riparian buffer.
(5) All residential development shall be located or designed in such a manner as to prevent
measurable degradation of water quality from storm water runoff. Adequate mitigation measures
shall be required and implemented where there is the reasonable potential for such adverse effect
on water quality.
Page 103 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 82
(6) New shoreline residences and appurtenant structures shall be sufficiently set back from
steep slopes and shorelines vulnerable to erosion so that structural improvements, including bluff
walls and other shoreline stabilization and flood control structures, are not necessary to protect
proposed residences and associated uses.
(7) New floating residences and overwater residential structures shall be prohibited in
shoreline jurisdiction.
(8) New, multi-unit residential development and the subdivision of land into five or more lots
shall make adequate provisions for public access consistent with the regulations set forth in PMC
29.15.070, Public access.
(9) New residential development shall connect with sewer systems, as required by the PMC.
(10) All new residential development shall meet the vegetation management provisions
contained in PMC 29.15.050, Shoreline vegetation conservation, and PMC 29.25.040, Fish and
wildlife habitat conservation areas.
(11) Residential development clustering may be required by the Shoreline Administrator where
appropriate to minimize ecological and visual impacts on shorelines, including minimization of
impacts on shoreline vegetation consistent with PMC 29.15.050, Shoreline vegetation
conservation. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.420.]
29.20.130 Shoreline habitat and natural systems enhancement projects.
(1) Shoreline restoration and enhancement activities designed to restore or enhance shoreline
ecological functions and processes and/or shoreline features should be targeted toward meeting
the needs of sensitive and/or regionally important plant, fish, and wildlife species, and shall be
given priority.
(2) Shoreline restoration, enhancement, and mitigation activities designed to create dynamic
and sustainable ecosystems to assist the City in achieving no net loss of shoreline ecological
functions are preferred.
(3) Restoration activities shall be carried out in accordance with an approved shoreline
restoration plan and in accordance with the provisions of this SMP.
(4) To the extent possible, restoration, enhancement, and mitigation activities shall be
integrated and coordinated with other parallel natural resource management efforts, such as those
identified in the shoreline restoration plan.
(5) Habitat creation, expansion, restoration, and enhancement projects may be permitted
subject to required state or federal permits when the applicant has demonstrated that:
(a) The primary objective is clearly restoration or enhancement of the natural character
or ecological function of the shoreline;
Page 104 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 83
(b) The project will not adversely impact spawning, nesting, or breeding in fish and
wildlife habitat conservation areas;
(c) Upstream or downstream properties or fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas
will not be adversely affected;
(d) Water quality will not be degraded;
(e) Flood storage capacity will not be degraded;
(f) Impacts to critical areas and buffers will be avoided and where unavoidable,
minimized and mitigated; and
(g) The project will not interfere with the normal public use of the navigable waters of
the state. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.430.]
29.20.140 Shoreline stabilization.
(1) Shoreline restoration and enhancement activities designed to restore shoreline ecological
functions and processes and/or shoreline features should be targeted toward meeting the needs of
sensitive and/or regionally important plant, fish, and wildlife species, and shall be given priority.
(2) New shoreline stabilization for new development is prohibited unless it can be
demonstrated that reasonable use of a lot or parcel legally created prior to the effective date of this
SMP is precluded without shore protection or is necessary to restore ecological functions or
hazardous substance remediation.
(3) Proposed designs for new or expanded shoreline stabilization shall be designed in
accordance with applicable state guidelines, must use the most current scientific and technical
information available, must document that alternative solutions are not feasible or do not provide
sufficient protection, must demonstrate that future stabilization measures would not be required
on the project site or adjacent properties, and be certified by a qualified professional.
(4) Land subdivisions and lot line adjustments shall be designed to ensure that future
development of the newly created lots will not require structural stabilization for subsequent
development to occur.
(5) New or expanded structural shoreline stabilization is prohibited except when necessity is
demonstrated consistent with the requirements of WAC 173-26-231(3). Necessity is demonstrated
through conclusive evidence documented by a geotechnical analysis that there is a significant
possibility that the structure will be damaged within three years as a result of shoreline erosion
caused by wind/wave action or other hydraulic forces and only when significant adverse impacts
are mitigated to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and/or processes.
Page 105 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 84
(6) Replacement of an existing shoreline stabilization structure with a similar structure is
permitted if there is a demonstrated need to protect existing primary uses, structures or public
facilities, including roads, bridges, railways, irrigation and utility systems from erosion caused by
stream undercutting or wave action. The existing shoreline stabilization structure will be removed
from the shoreline as part of the replacement activity. Replacement walls or bulkheads shall not
encroach waterward of the OHWM or existing structure unless the facility was occupied prior to
January 1, 1992, and there are overriding safety or environmental concerns. Proposed designs for
new or expanded shore stabilization shall be in accordance with applicable state guidelines and
certified by a qualified professional.
(7) Where a geotechnical analysis confirms a need to prevent potential damage to a primary
structure, but the need is not as immediate as three years, the analysis may still be used to justify
more immediate authorization for shoreline stabilization using bioengineering approaches.
(8) Shoreline stabilization projects that are part of a fish habitat enhancement project meeting
the criteria of RCW 77.55.181 will be authorized through a shoreline exemption. Stabilization
projects that are not part of such a fish enhancement project will be regulated by this SMP.
(9) Small-scale shoreline stabilization projects (e.g., tree-planting projects or other minimally
intrusive enhancements) shall be reviewed by a qualified professional to ensure that the project
has been designed using the most current scientific and technical information available.
(10) Large-scale or more complex shoreline stabilization projects (e.g., projects requiring fill or
excavation, placing objects in the water, or hardening the bank) shall be designed by a qualified
professional using the most current scientific and technical information available. The applicant
may be required to have a qualified professional oversee construction or construct the project.
(11) New stabilization structures, when found to be necessary, will implement the following
standards:
(a) Limit the size of the project to the minimum amount necessary;
(b) Include measures to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions; and
(c) Use biotechnical bank stabilization techniques unless those are demonstrated to be
infeasible or ineffective before implementing “hard” structural stabilization measures.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.440.]
29.20.150 Transportation –Trails, roads, and parking.
(1) New or expanded motor vehicle and rail transportation facilities shall not be located within
shoreline jurisdiction, unless:
(a) The proponent demonstrates that no feasible upland alternatives exist;
Page 106 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 85
(b) The project represents the minimum development necessary to serve another
specific, localized, and permitted shoreline use; or
(c) In the case of a water crossing, the proponent demonstrates that the project is
necessary to further a substantial public interest.
(2) When new roads or road expansions are unavoidable in shoreline jurisdiction, proposed
transportation facilities shall be planned, located, and designed to achieve the following:
(a) Meet mitigation sequencing provisions of PMC 29.15.040, Environmental
protection;
(b) Avoid adverse impacts on existing or planned water-oriented uses;
(c) Set back from the OHWM to allow for a usable shoreline area for vegetation
conservation and any preferred shoreline uses unless infeasible;
(d) Minimize grading, vegetation clearing, and alterations of the natural topography;
and
(e) Use BMPs for preventing erosion and degradation of surface water quality.
(3) Improvements to existing motor vehicle and rail transportation facilities shall not interfere
with pedestrian and bicycle access and shall, whenever possible, provide for expansion and
enhancement of pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities.
(4) Transportation facilities and services for motor vehicles and rail shall utilize existing
transportation corridors whenever possible.
(5) The development, improvement, and expansion of pedestrian and bicycle transportation
facilities are allowed within all environments. Such transportation facilities are a preferred use
wherever they are compatible with the natural character, resources, and ecology of the shoreline.
(6) Pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities shall be designed, located, and constructed
consistent with the policies and regulations for public access as provided in PMC 29.15.070, Public
access. Linkage among shoreline parks, recreation areas, and public access points is encouraged,
when feasible.
(7) Parking facilities are not a water-dependent use and shall only be permitted in the shoreline
jurisdiction to support an authorized use where it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the
Shoreline Administrator that there are no feasible alternative locations away from the shoreline.
Parking as a primary use shall not be allowed within 50 feet of edge of riparian vegetation corridor.
Accessory parking facilities shall be subject to the same permit type as the primary use.
(8) Accessory parking facilities shall be planned to avoid or minimize adverse effects on
unique or fragile shoreline features and shall not result in a net loss of shoreline ecological
Page 107 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 86
functions or adversely affect existing or planned water-dependent uses. Parking facilities shall be
located upland of the principal structure, building, or development they serve, and prefer ably
outside of shoreline jurisdiction, except:
(a) Where the proponent demonstrates that an alternate location would reduce adverse
impacts on the shoreline and adjacent uses;
(b) Where another location is not feasible; and/or
(c) Except when ADA standards require otherwise.
(d) In such cases, the applicant shall demonstrate use of measures to reduce adverse
impacts of parking facilities in shoreline jurisdiction, such as low-impact development
techniques, buffering, or other measures approved by the Shoreline Administrator.
(9) Parking facilities shall be landscaped in a manner to minimize adverse visual and aesthetic
impacts on adjacent shoreline and abutting properties.
(10) All forms of transportation facilities shall, wherever feasible, consolidate water crossings
and make joint use of rights-of-way with existing or planned future primary utility facilities and
other transportation facility modalities.
(11) Improvements to all existing transportation facilities shall provide for the reestablishment
and enhancement of natural vegetation along the shoreline when appropriate.
(12) If located in the side yard or waterward side of a structure, loading areas shall be screened
from view of pedestrians on either side of the waterway. The visual screen shall comprise a fence
or wall with trees and shrubs consistent with the City’s landscape standards.
(13) Shoreline crossings and culverts shall be designed to minimize adverse impacts on riparian
and aquatic habitat and shall allow for fish passage. See PMC 29.25.040, Fish and wildlife habitat
areas, for regulations governing crossings of nonshoreline streams located in shoreline jurisdiction.
(14) Trails shall be designed consistent with public access requirements in PMC 29.15.070,
Public access. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.450.]
29.20.160 Utilities.
(1) Nonwater-oriented utility production and processing facilities and transmission facilities
are permitted in shoreline jurisdiction only if no practical upland alternative or location exists.
New primary utility production and processing facilities or parts of those facilities, such as power
plants, solid waste storage, or disposal facilities that are nonwater-oriented, should not be
permitted within shoreline jurisdiction unless no other options are feasible.
(2) The principal uses permitted by this section include sewage collection, holding, transfer
and treatment pipelines, tanks, structures, containment facilities, and buildings. Water diversion,
Page 108 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 87
treatment and conveyance facilities are also considered principal uses. Accessory facilities are also
permitted, including, but not limited to:
(a) Plant monitoring and control facilities and on-site administrative offices;
(b) Plant access and logistical facilities, such as storage areas and material handling
ramps and facilities, including utility delivery (electrical and communication) facilities;
(c) Plant security and safety features, such as fences and signage; and
(d) Other accessory or auxiliary uses or features, necessary to effective and efficient
operation of the plant, which cannot feasibly be located outside the shoreline jurisdiction.
(3) Expansion of existing primary utility facilities within shoreline jurisdiction must
demonstrate:
(a) The expansion is designed to protect adjacent shorelands from erosion, pollution,
or other environmentally detrimental factors during and after construction.
(b) The project is planned to fit existing natural topography as much as practical and
avoid alteration of the existing natural environment.
(c) Debris, overburden, and other construction waste materials shall be disposed of so
as to prevent erosion or pollution of a water body.
(4) New primary utility facilities and expansions shall include provisions to control the
quantity and quality of surface water runoff to natural water bodies, using BMPs to retain natural
flow rates. A maintenance program to ensure continued proper functioning of such new facilities
shall be required.
(5) Applications for installation of utility facilities other than water-dependent facilities within
the high intensity environment designation shall include the following:
(a) Reason why the utility facility must be in shoreline jurisdiction;
(b) Alternative locations considered and reasons for their elimination;
(c) Location of the same, similar, or other utility facilities in the vicinity of the
proposed project;
(d) Proposed method(s) of construction;
(e) Plans for reclamation of areas to be disturbed during construction;
(f) Landscape plans;
Page 109 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 88
(g) Methods to achieve no net loss of ecological function and minimize clearing of
native vegetation; and
(h) Consistency with the City’s plans for utilities, where such plans exist.
(6) Applications for installation of utility facilities shall include the following:
(a) Proposed method(s) of construction;
(b) Plans for reclamation of areas to be disturbed during construction;
(c) Landscape plans; and
(d) Methods to achieve no net loss of ecological function and minimize clearing of
native vegetation.
(7) Where feasible, utilities shall be consolidated within a single easement and utilize existing
rights-of-way. Any utility located within property owned by the utility, which must of necessity
cross shoreline jurisdiction, shall be designed and operated to reserve the option of general public
recreational usage of the right-of-way in the future. This option shall be exercised by the public
only where:
(a) The public will not be exposed to dangers from the utility equipment; and
(b) The utility itself will not be subjected to unusual risks of damage by the public.
(8) In areas where utilities must cross shoreline jurisdiction, they shall do so by the most direct
route feasible, unless such a route would negatively affect an environmentally critical area,
obstruct public access to the shoreline, or interfere with the navigability of a water body regulated
by this SMP. See PMC 29.25.040, Fish and wildlife habitat areas, for regulations governing
crossings of nonshoreline streams located in shoreline jurisdiction.
(9) Utility facilities shall be designed and located in a manner that protects scenic views and
minimizes adverse aesthetic impacts.
(10) New utilities, which must be constructed across shoreline jurisdiction in previously
undisturbed areas, must submit a mitigation plan demonstrating the restoration of the shoreline to
at least its existing condition. Upon completion of utility installation or maintenance, any disturbed
areas shall be regraded to be compatible with the natural terrain of the area and revegetated with
appropriate native plants to prevent erosion.
(11) Outside of the high intensity environment designations, all underwater pipelines or those
paralleling the waterway transporting liquids potentially injurious to aquatic life or water quality
shall be prohibited, unless no other alternative exists to serve a public interest. In those limited
instances where permitted, shutoff valves shall be provided at both sides of the water body except
Page 110 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 89
for public sanitary sewers of a gravity or siphon nature. In all cases, no net loss of ecological
functions shall be maintained.
(12) Where utilities cannot cross a shoreline water body via a bridge or other existing water
crossing, the utilities shall evaluate site-specific habitat conditions and demonstrate whether
impacts can mitigated to negatively impact substrate, or whether utilities will need to be bored
beneath the water body such that the substrate is not disturbed. Construction of pipelines placed
under aquatic areas shall be placed in a sleeve to avoid the need for excavation in the event of a
failure in the future.
(13) Minor trenching to allow the installation of necessary underground pipes or cables is
allowed if no alternative, including boring, is feasible, and if:
(a) Impacts on fish and wildlife habitat are avoided to the maximum extent possible.
(b) The utility installation shall not increase or decrease the natural rate, extent, or
opportunity of channel migration.
(c) Appropriate BMPs are employed to prevent water quality impacts or other
environmental degradation.
(14) Utility installation and maintenance operations shall be conducted in a manner that does
not negatively affect surface water quality or quantity. Applications for new utility projects in
shoreline jurisdiction shall include a list of BMPs to protect water quality. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016;
Code 1970 § 29.01.460.]
Chapter 29.25
CRITICAL AREAS
Sections:
29.25.010 Critical areas.
29.25.020 General provisions.
29.25.030 Wetlands.
29.25.040 Fish and wildlife habitat.
29.25.050 Aquifer recharge areas.
29.25.060 Flood hazard areas.
29.25.070 Geologic hazard areas.
29.25.010 Critical areas.
(1) Purpose.
(a) The purpose of this chapter, critical areas, is to conserve and protect the values and
functions of environmentally sensitive and hazardous areas which contribute to public
health, safety, and welfare of the community without violating any citizen’s constitutional
Page 111 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 90
rights to the use of property as required by the GMA of 1990 (Chapter 17, Laws of 1990)
and the SMA (Chapter 90.58 RCW) through the application of the most current scientific
and technical information available.
(b) The City shall regulate in shoreline jurisdiction all uses, activities, and development
within, adjacent to, or likely to affect one or more critical areas.
(2) Critical Areas. Critical areas of concern to the City of Pasco within the shoreline
jurisdiction include:
(a) Wetlands;
(b) Fish and wildlife habitats;
(c) Aquifer recharge areas;
(d) Flood hazard areas; and
(e) Geologically hazardous areas, such as those subject to landslide and steep slope
failures, erosion, seismic events, mine collapse, and volcanic hazards.
(3) Critical Area Categories. The City finds that these critical areas fall into one or both of the
following categories:
(a) Critical areas provide a variety of valuable and beneficial biological and physical
functions that benefit the City and its residents; and
(b) Critical areas pose potential threats to human safety or to public and private
property.
(4) Intent. The intent of this chapter is to implement the provisions of the GMA, SMA, and the
Comprehensive Plan by managing development in harmony with critical areas. This chapter seeks
to:
(a) Protect members of the public and public resources and facilities from injury, loss
of life, or property damage due to landslides and steep slope failures, erosion, seismic
events, volcanic eruptions, or flooding;
(b) Protect unique, fragile and valuable elements of the environment, including fish
and wildlife and their habitats;
(c) Mitigate unavoidable impacts to environmentally sensitive areas by regulating
alterations in and adjacent to critical areas;
(d) Prevent cumulative adverse environmental impacts to water quality and wetlands;
Page 112 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 91
(e) Meet the requirements of the Washington GMA (Chapter 36.70A RCW), and SMA
(Chapter 90.58 RCW) with regard to the protection of critical area lands;
(f) Coordinate environmental review and permitting of proposals to avoid duplication
and delay of desirable actions.
(5) Most Current Scientific and Technical Information.
(a) WAC 173.26.201(2)(a) requires the City to identify and assemble the most current,
accurate, and complete scientific and technical information available regarding the
development of policies related to identification of and policies governing management
recommendations for critical areas.
(b) Critical area reports, mitigation plans, and decisions to permit the alteration of
critical areas within the shoreline jurisdiction shall rely on the most current scientific and
technical information to ensure the protection of the ecological functions and values of
critical areas, and must give special consideration to conservation or protection measures
necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fish and their habitat.
(c) The most current scientific and technical information that is consistent with criteria
established in WAC 173.26.201(2)(a) may include the following:
(i) Critical area maps;
(ii) Maps and reference documents in the City of Pasco’s Inventory,
Characterization, and Analysis Report, as applicable;
(iii) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle maps, including
Washington Department of Natural Resources Geologic Information Portal2;
(iv) Aerial photographs;
(v) Soil Survey of Franklin County, Washington, by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service;
(vi) National Wetland Inventory maps; and
(vii) WDFW Priority Habitats and Species maps. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970
§ 29.01.500.]
29.25.020 General provisions.
(1) Authorizations Required. Prior to fulfilling the requirements of this chapter, the City shall
not grant any approval or permission to alter the condition of any land, water or vegetation, or to
construct or alter any structure or improvement including, but not limited to, the following:
Page 113 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 92
(a) Building permit;
(b) Special use permit;
(c) Shoreline special use permit;
(d) Shoreline substantial development permit;
(e) Shoreline variance permit;
(f) Binding site plan;
(g) Short subdivision;
(h) Subdivision;
(i) Zoning variance permit;
(j) Rezone; or
(k) Any other adopted permit or required approval not expressly exempted by this
section.
(2) Jurisdiction.
(a) This chapter shall apply to all lands, all land uses and development and all structures
and facilities in City’s shoreline jurisdiction. This chapter shall apply to every person,
individual, firm, partnership, corporation, governmental agency or other entity that owns,
leases, or administers land within the City’s shoreline jurisdiction.
(b) This section provides regulations for land use and development in and adjacent to
critical areas within the City’s shoreline jurisdiction.
(3) Allowed uses.
(a) All allowed activities shall use reasonable methods supported by the most current
scientific and technical information or accepted BMPs with the least amount of potential
impact to the critical areas. Any incidental damage to or alteration of a critical ar ea that is
not a necessary outcome of the exempted activity shall be restored, rehabilitated, or
replaced at the responsible party’s expense. This includes, but is not limited to, access ways
or paths, vegetation removal or damage beyond a reasonable work zone, and grading and
clearing not essential to the ongoing operation of the site’s use. Uses allowed under this
section do not give permission to destroy a critical area or ignore risk from natural hazards.
See PMC 29.35.080, Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permits, for
provisions for exempted activities within shoreline jurisdiction. Allowed uses include:
Page 114 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 93
(i) Modification of any existing structure that does not alter the structure to
further intrude into a critical area or established buffer and does not increase risk to
life and property. Modification includes construction of tenant improvements,
fences, decks, patios, driveways, signs, and accessory structures.
(ii) Operation and maintenance of any system of existing dikes, levees, ditches,
drains, or other facilities which were created, developed or utilized primarily as a
part of a drainage or diking system. Operation and maintenance does not necessarily
include the expansion or new construction of drainage ditches and related facilities.
See PMC 29.35.080, Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permits,
for additional provisions that may be applicable.
(iii) Removal of hazardous trees and vegetation and, when necessary, measures
to control or prevent a fire or halt the spread of disease or damaging insects
consistent with the State Forest Practices Act, Chapter 76.09 RCW; provided, that
no vegetation shall be removed from a critical area or its buffer without approval
from the City.
(iv) Activities involving artificially created wetlands or streams intentionally
created from nonwetland sites, including, but not limited to: grass-lined swales,
irrigation and drainage ditches, detention facilities, and landscape features, except
those features that provide critical habitat for anadromous fish and those features
that were created as mitigation for projects or alterations subject to the provisions
of this chapter.
(v) Passive recreational activities, including, but not limited to, fishing, bird
watching, boating, swimming, hiking, and use of nature trails, provided the activity
does not alter the critical area or its buffer.
(vi) The harvesting of wild crops in a manner that is not injurious to natural
reproduction of such crops and provided the harvesting does not require tilling soil,
planting crops, or changing existing topography, water conditions or water sources.
(vii) Educational and scientific research.
(viii) Existing and ongoing agricultural activities and related development
activities, provided no alteration of flood storage capacity or conveyance, or
increase in the extent or nature of impact to a critical area or its buffer occurs,
beyond that which has occurred prior to the effective date of this chapter.
(b) If the proposed activity meets any of the listed allowed uses, including any BMP
and/or restoration requirements, completion of a critical area checklist or further critical
area review is not required.
(4) Critical Area Review.
Page 115 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 94
(a) The City of Pasco shall complete a critical area review prior to granting any
shoreline permit approval for a development or other alteration on a site that is found to
likely include, or be adjacent to, or have significant impact upon one or more critical areas,
unless otherwise provided in this chapter. As part of this review, the Shoreline
Administrator shall verify the information submitted by the applicant, and:
(i) Confirm the extent, nature, and type of any critical areas identified and
evaluate any required critical area detailed study;
(ii) Determine whether the development proposal conforms to the purposes and
performance standards of this chapter;
(iii) Assess impacts on the critical area from the activities and uses proposed and
determine whether any proposed alterations to, or impacts upon, critical areas are
necessary and unavoidable in order to meet the objectives of the proposal; and
(iv) Determine if any required mitigation plans proposed by the applicant are
sufficient to protect the critical area and public health, safety, and welfare concerns
consistent with the goals, purposes, objectives, and requirements of this chapter.
(b) The applicant shall be responsible for the initiation, preparation, submission, and
expense of all required assessments, studies, plans, reconnaissance, and other work in
support of the application. The applicant shall provide the City with digital copies and
paper copies of reports/studies and maps prepared for the reports/studies, including all
geotechnical studies and mapping.
(5) Minimum Standards. Any proposed activity shall be conditioned as necessary to mitigate
impacts to critical areas to ensure no net loss of ecological function and conform to the
performance standards required by this chapter and PMC 29.15.040, Environmental protection.
(6) Concurrent Requirements. Lands characterized by one or more critical area features may
also be subject to other regulations established by this chapter due to overlap or multiple functions
of some critical areas. In the event of conflict between regulations, the most restrictive regulations
shall apply.
(7) Critical Area Checklist.
(a) For any proposed activity not found to be exempt under subsection (3) of this
section or PMC 29.35.080, Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permits,
the applicant shall complete a critical area checklist on forms provided by the City. The
checklist must be submitted to the Shoreline Administrator prior to consideration of any
permit request that requires a critical area review as described in this section.
(b) Following receipt of the checklist, the Shoreline Administrator will conduct a
review to determine whether there are any critical area indicators present that may be
impacted by the proposal.
Page 116 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 95
(8) Initial Determination.
(a) If the Shoreline Administrator determines the site potentially includes, or is
adjacent to critical areas, or the proposed project could have significant adverse impacts on
critical areas, the Shoreline Administrator shall notify the applicant that a critical area
detailed study is required for each of the indicated critical area types.
(b) If the review of the checklist and critical area resources do not indicate that critical
areas are included or adjacent to the activity, or could suffer probable significant adverse
impacts from the activity, then the Shoreline Administrator shall rule that the critical area
review is complete. The determination shall be noted on the checklist.
(c) The applicant shall acknowledge in writing that a determination regarding the
apparent absence of one or more critical areas by the Shoreline Administrator is not
intended to be an expert certification regarding the presence of critical areas and the
determination is subject to possible reconsideration and reopening if new information is
received. If the applicant wants greater assurance of the accuracy of the critical area review
determination, the applicant may hire a qualified consultant professional to provide, such
assurances.
(9) Waivers from Critical Area Detailed Study Requirements.
(a) The Shoreline Administrator may waive the requirement for a critical area detailed
study if there is substantial evidence that:
(i) There will be no alteration of the critical areas or required buffer;
(ii) The development proposal will not impact the critical area in a manner
contrary to the purpose, intent and requirements of this chapter; and
(iii) The performance standards required by this chapter will be met.
(b) In making the determination, the Shoreline Administrator may use any of the most
current scientific information and the critical area reference maps and/or inventories
identified in PMC 29.25.010(5).
(c) Notice of the findings substantiating the waiver will be attached to the permit and
filed with the application records.
(10) Critical Area Detailed Studies.
(a) Preliminary Reconnaissance. If a critical area detailed study is determined to be
necessary, then a data review and field reconnaissance shall be performed by a qualified
consultant professional for that type of critical area. If the detailed study reveals no critical
area is present, then a statement of this finding along with supporting evidence shall be
Page 117 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 96
prepared by the consultant professional and submitted to the City. An approved finding of
the lack of a critical area shall satisfy all of the requirements for a detailed study.
(b) Minimum Requirements. If the data review and field reconnaissance reveals that a
critical area is present, then a complete detailed study shall be prepared by the applicant
and submitted to the City. At a minimum, a critical area detailed study shall comply with
the specific criteria in PMC 29.25.030 through PMC 29.25.070, and clearly document:
(i) The boundary and extent of the critical area;
(ii) The existing function, value, and/or hazard associated with the critical area;
(iii) The probable impact upon the function, value, and/or hazard associated with
the critical area from the project as proposed; and
(iv) A mitigation plan including the items in subsection (13) of this section.
(c) Limitations to Study Area. If the applicant, together with assistance from the City,
cannot obtain permission for access to properties adjacent to the project area, then the
critical area detailed study may be limited accordingly.
(d) Preparation and Determination of Completeness. The critical area detailed study
shall be prepared by a qualified consultant professional for the type of critical area or areas
involved. The qualified consultant professional may consult with the Shoreline
Administrator prior to or during preparation of the critical area detailed study to obtain City
approval of modifications to the contents of the study where, in the judgment of the
qualified consultant professional, more or less information is required to adequately
address the critical area impacts and required mitigation.
If the critical area detailed study is found to be incomplete, the applicant shall be notified
and the critical area review process shall be suspended pending correction of the
inadequacies. Upon receipt of a complete critical area detailed study a final determination
is to be rendered.
(11) Final Determination. Following submission of a completed detailed study, the Shoreline
Administrator will review the detailed study and make a determination, based on the critical area
detailed study and any other available and appropriate materials. The Shoreline Administrator’s
determination will address the adequacy of the project, as proposed, to mitigate any effects it may
have on critical areas that are included within or adjacent to the project site. The Shoreline
Administrator may elect to request assistance from state resource agency staff if necessary. In
addition, the Shoreline Administrator will assess the adequacy of the project proposal’s
compliance with the applicable performance standards and this SMP. Notice of this determination
shall be attached to the permit and the critical area review shall be completed.
(a) Favorable Determination. A determination that the project proposal adequately
mitigates its impacts on the critical areas and complies with the applicable performance
Page 118 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 97
standards satisfies the provisions of this title only. It should not be construed as
endorsement or approval of the original or any subsequent permit applications.
(b) Unfavorable Determination. When a project proposal is found to not adequately
mitigate its impacts on the critical areas and/or not comply with applicable performance
standards, the Shoreline Administrator shall prepare written notice of the reasons for the
finding of noncompliance. Such notice shall identify the critical area impacted and the
nature of the impact.
Following notice of a determination from the critical area review that the proposed activity
does not adequately mitigate its impacts on the critical areas and/or does not comply with
applicable performance standards, the applicant may request consideration of a revised
mitigation plan. If the revision is found to be substantial and relevant to the critical area
review, the Shoreline Administrator may reopen the critical area review and make a new
determination based on this revised mitigation plan.
(12) Completion of the Critical Area Review. If at any time prior to completion of the public
input process on associated permits or approvals, the City receives new evidence that a critical
area may be included in, adjacent to, or significantly impacted by the proposed activity, then the
City shall reopen the critical area review process and shall require whatever level of critical area
review and mitigation as indicated by the evidence. Once the public input process on all associated
permits or approvals is completed and the record is closed, then the City’s determination regarding
critical areas shall be final, unless appeal is filed as per PMC 29.35.120, Appeals.
(13) Mitigation Standards.
(a) All proposed critical area alterations shall include mitigation sufficient to maintain
the function and values of the critical area or to prevent risk from a hazard posed by a
critical area. Mitigation of one critical area impact should not result in unmitigated impacts
to another critical area. Mitigation includes avoiding, minimizing, or compensating for
adverse impacts to critical areas or their buffers. The preferred sequence of mitigation is
defined in PMC 29.15.040, Environmental protection.
(b) Possible mitigation techniques include, but are not limited to, buffers, setbacks,
limits on clearing and grading, creation of artificial wetlands, stream bank stabilization,
modified construction methods, and BMPs for erosion control and maintenance of water
quality.
(c) All proposed mitigation shall be documented in a mitigation plan included as an
element of the critical area detailed study. The mitigation plan shall include a description
of the following:
(i) The proposed mitigation;
(ii) How the proposed mitigation will maintain the critical area function, any
ongoing monitoring and/or inspection that may be required to ensure the adequacy
Page 119 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 98
of the proposed mitigation, and an evaluation of the anticipated effectiveness of the
proposed mitigation;
(iii) Any remedial measures that may be required, depending on the outcome of
that ongoing monitoring and/or inspection;
(iv) Any required critical areas expertise necessary to install, monitor, or inspect
the proposed mitigation; and
(v) Any bonding or other security required to insure performance and/or
maintenance of the proposed mitigation.
(14) Buffers.
(a) Buffers have, in some cases, been determined to be necessary to protect critical
areas and their functions. Where specific buffers are identified, those buffers are deemed
“required” or “standard” buffers. See Table 29.15.020(2) for riparian buffers and PMC
29.25.030 for wetland buffers.
(i) Except as otherwise specified herein, required buffers shall be retained in
their pre-existing condition. If a project does not propose any alteration of buffers
or of the associated critical area, then subject to the following provision, no
additional mitigation will be required to protect the critical area. Additional
mitigation beyond the required buffer shall be required if the Shoreline
Administrator finds that, based on unique features of the critical area or its buffer
or of the proposed activity, the required buffers will not adequately protect the
function of the critical area or prevent risk of hazard from the critical area and that
additional mitigation or buffering is required to protect the critical area function or
to prevent risk of hazard from the critical area.
(ii) The buffer shall be marked prior to any site alteration, and boundary
markers shall be visible, durable, and permanently affixed to the ground. The
boundary markers shall remain until all activity is completed and a final site
inspection is completed.
(iii) An eight-foot-minimum setback shall be required from the buffer area for
any construction of impervious surface area greater 120 square feet. Clearing,
grading, and filling within this setback shall only be allowed when the applicant
can demonstrate that vegetation within the buffer will not be damaged.
(iv) Where temporary buffer disturbance or alteration has occurred or will occur
in conjunction with regulated activities, revegetation with appropriate native
vegetation shall be required and completed one month before the end of the growing
season.
Page 120 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 99
(v) Normal nondestructive pruning and trimming of vegetation for maintenance
purposes, or thinning of limbs of individual trees to provide a view corridor, shall
not be subject to these buffer requirements. Enhancement of a view corridor shall
not be construed to mean excessive removal of trees or vegetation that impairs
views. See also PMC 29.15.050, Shoreline vegetation conservation.
(b) If the applicant proposes to reduce required buffers or to alter the required buffer,
then the applicant shall demonstrate why such buffer modification, together with any
alternative mitigation proposed in the critical area detailed study, is sufficient to protect the
critical area function or to prevent risk of hazard from the critical area.
(c) The critical area detailed study shall make adequate provision for long-term buffer
protection. Periodic inspection of the buffers may be required if deemed to ensure long-
term buffer protection.
(15) Bonding. The Shoreline Administrator shall have the discretion to require a bond, which
will ensure compliance with the mitigation plan if activity related to the protection of the critical
area(s) (e.g., monitoring or maintenance) or construction is scheduled to take place after the
issuance of the City’s permit. The bond shall be in the form of a surety bond, performance bond,
assignment of savings account, or an irrevocable standby letter of credit guaranteed by a financial
institution with terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. The bond shall be in the
amount of 125 percent of the estimated cost of the uncompleted actions or construction, or the
estimated cost of restoring the function and values of the critical area that is at risk, whichever is
higher. The term of the bond shall be two years, or until the additional activity or construction has
been completed and passed the necessary inspections, whichever is longer.
(16) Incentives. The following incentives are intended to minimize the burden to individual
property owners from application of the provisions of this chapter:
(a) Open Space. Any property owner on whose property a critical area or its associated
buffer is located and who proposes to put the critical area and buffer in a separate tract may
apply for current use property tax assessment on that separate tract through Franklin
County, pursuant to Chapter 84.34 RCW.
(b) Conservation Easement. Any person whose property contains an identified critical
area or its associated buffer may place a conservation easement over that portion of the
property by naming a beneficiary under RCW 64.04.130 as beneficiary of the conservation
easement. This conservation easement may be in lieu of a separate critical areas tract that
qualifies for open-space tax assessment described in this subsection (16). The purpose of
the easement shall be to preserve, protect, maintain, restore, and limit future use of the
property affected. The terms of the conservation easement may include prohibitions or
restrictions on access.
(17) Critical Areas Mapping. The approximate location and extent of critical areas in the City
of Pasco may include the following:
Page 121 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 100
(a) Critical areas shown on the critical areas map adopted as a part of the
Comprehensive Plan.
(b) Other mapping resources provided in PMC 29.25.010(5).
Mapping resources are to be used only as guides to alert the user to the possible distribution,
location, and extent of critical areas. Mapping shall be utilized as a source of generalized
information and shall not be considered as regulatory standards or substitute for site-
specific assessments. The actual type, extent, and boundaries of critical areas shall be
determined in the field by a qualified specialist according to the procedures, definitions,
and criteria established in this chapter. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.510.]
29.25.030 Wetlands.
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to promote public health and welfare by instituting
local measures to preserve naturally occurring wetlands that exist in the City’s shoreline
jurisdiction for their associated value. These areas may serve a variety of vital functions, including,
but not limited to, flood storage and conveyance, water quality protection, recharge and discharge
areas for groundwater, erosion control, sediment control, fish and wildlife habitat, recreation,
education, and scientific research.
(2) Wetland Designation. Under this chapter, wetlands shall be designated in accordance with
the definitions, methods, and standards set forth in the approved 1987 USACE Wetlands
Delineation Manual, as amended and its applicable regional supplements, as amended (The Arid
West Final Regional Supplement was last updated in 2008 at time of SMP adoption). All areas
within the City of Pasco meeting the criteria identified in this delineation manual, regardless of
whether or not these areas have been formally identified as wetlands, are hereby designated as
wetland critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this chapter.
(3) Wetland Rating (Classification).
(a) The wetlands rating system is intended to differentiate between wetlands based on
their sensitivity to disturbance, rarity, irreplaceability, and the functions and values they
provide. A general description of wetland categories and the rationale for each category is
provided in PMC 29.05.070, Definitions (see “Wetland Categories”).
(b) Wetlands shall be rated (classified) as either Category I, Category II, Category III,
or Category IV according to the criteria listed in this section. This rating system is based
on the Washington Department of Ecology’s Washington State Wetlands Rating System
for Eastern Washington-Ecology Publication No. 14-06-030 (October 2014), as amended.
The most current edition of this document should be used in classifying wetlands and
developing wetland mitigation plans.
(4) Wetland Indicators. The following indicators of wetland presence shall be used by the
Shoreline Administrator to determine if a wetland detailed study is needed:
Page 122 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 101
(a) Listing in the City’s critical areas mapping resources as a wetland or resources
listed in PMC 29.25.010(5);
(b) Documentation, through references in state or federal handbooks and/or reports by
qualified experts;
(c) A finding by a qualified wetland biologist that an appropriate hydrologic, soil,
and/or vegetation regime indicative of a wetland exists; or
(d) A reasonable belief by the Shoreline Administrator that a wetland may exist,
supported by a site visit and subsequent consultation with a qualified wetland biologist.
(5) Wetland Detailed Study. Requirements. If a wetland detailed study is required, it shall meet
the following requirements in addition to the basic requirements identified in PMC 29.25.020(10):
(a) The wetland detailed study shall be completed by a qualified wetlands biologist.
(b) The extent and boundaries of any wetlands shall be determined in accordance with
the methodology specified under subsection (2) of this section. The boundary shall be
surveyed and mapped at a scale no smaller than one inch equals 200 feet.
(c) A wetland community description and wetland classification shall be completed,
consistent with the requirements of subsection (2) of this section.
(d) A written values and functions assessment shall be completed and address site
hydrology (source of water in the system, water quality, flood and stream flow attenuation,
seasonality of presence of water, if applicable), soils, vegetation, fish and wildlife habitat,
recreation, and aesthetics.
(e) The site plan for the proposed activity shall be mapped at the same scale as the
wetland map, showing the extent of the proposed activity in relationship to the surveyed
wetland, including a detailed narrative describing the project, its relationship to the
wetland, and its potential impact on the wetland.
(f) The proposed mitigation plan shall follow the general mitigation plan requirements
described in PMC 29.25.020(13), and address how the activity has been mitigated to avoid
and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. The Wetland Mitigation in Washington State –
Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans, Department of Ecology Publication No. 06-06-011b,
March 2006 (or any succeeding documents) should be used as a basis for mitigation.
(6) Wetland Detailed Study Exemptions. In addition to activities exempted in PMC
29.25.020(3) and PMC 29.35.080, the following activities shall not require a wetland detailed
study, provided they are conducted using accepted BMPs as determined by the Shoreline
Administrator:
(a) Conservation or preservation of soil, water, vegetation, fish, or other wildlife.
Page 123 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 102
(7) Basic Wetland Requirement. A regulated wetland or its required buffer can only be altered
if the wetland detailed study shows that:
(a) The proposed alteration does not degrade the quantitative and qualitative functions
of the wetland and results in no net loss of ecological function, or
(b) Any degradation can be adequately mitigated to protect the wetland function. Any
proposed alteration approved pursuant to this section shall include mitigation necessary to
mitigate the impacts of the proposed alteration on the wetland as described in this section
and PMC 29.25.020(13).
(8) Required Buffers.
(a) Buffer Requirements. The following buffers shall be required for wetlands based on
the rating of the wetland as outlined in subsection (3) and land-use intensity described in Table
29.25.030(8)(b).
(i) Any wetland created, restored, or enhanced as compensation for approved
wetland alterations shall also include the standard buffer required for the category
of the created, restored, or enhanced wetland.
Table 29.25.030(8)(a). Wetland Buffer Width Requirements
Wetland Characteristics Buffer Width by Impact
of Proposed Land Use
Other Measures
Recommended for
Protection
Category IV Wetlands (For wetlands scoring less than 16 points for all functions)
Score for all three basic
functions is less than 16 points
Low – 25 feet
Moderate – 40 feet
High – 50 feet
No recommendations at this
time
Category III Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 16 to 18 points or more for all functions)
Page 124 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 103
Wetland Characteristics Buffer Width by Impact
of Proposed Land Use
Other Measures
Recommended for
Protection
Moderate level of function for
habitat (score for habitat 5 to 7
points)
*If wetland scores 8 to 9 habitat
points, use Category II buffers
Low – 75 feet
Moderate – 110 feet
High – 150 feet
No recommendations at this
time
Score habitat for 3 to 4 points Low – 40 feet
Moderate – 60 feet
High – 80 feet
No recommendations at this
time
Category II Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 19 to 21 points or more for all functions or
having the “Special Characteristics” identified in the rating system)
High level of function for habitat
(score for habitat 8 to 9 points)
Low – 100 feet
Moderate – 150 feet
High – 200 feet
Maintain connections to
other habitat areas
Moderate level of function for
habitat (score for habitat 5 to 7
points)
Low – 75 feet
Moderate – 110 feet
High – 150 feet
No recommendations at this
time
High level of function for water
quality improvement and low for
habitat (score for water quality 8
Low – 50 feet
Moderate – 75 feet
High – 100 feet
No additional surface
discharges of untreated
runoff
Page 125 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 104
Wetland Characteristics Buffer Width by Impact
of Proposed Land Use
Other Measures
Recommended for
Protection
to 9 points; habitat less than 5
points)
Riparian forest Buffer width to be based on
score for habitat functions
or water quality functions
Riparian forest wetlands
need to be protected at a
watershed or subbasin scale
Other protection based on
needs to protect habitat and
water quality functions
Not meeting above characteristic Low – 50 feet
Moderate – 75 feet
High – 100 feet
No recommendations at this
time
Vernal pool Low – 100 feet
Moderate – 150 feet
High – 200 feet
Or develop a regional plan
to protect the most
important vernal pool
complexes; buffers of
vernal pools outside
protection zones can then
be reduced to:
Low – 40 feet
No intensive grazing or
tilling of wetland
Page 126 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 105
Wetland Characteristics Buffer Width by Impact
of Proposed Land Use
Other Measures
Recommended for
Protection
Moderate – 60 feet
High – 80 feet
Category I Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 22 points or more for all functions or having
the “Special Characteristics” identified in the rating system)
Wetlands of high conservation
value
Low – 125 feet
Moderate – 190 feet
High – 250 feet
No additional surface
discharges to wetland or its
tributaries
No septic systems within
300 feet of wetland
Restore degraded parts of
buffer
High level of function for habitat
(score for habitat 8 to 9 points)
Low – 100 feet
Moderate – 150 feet
High – 200 feet
Restore degraded parts of
buffer
Maintain connections to
other habitat areas
Moderate level of function for
habitat (score for habitat 5 to 7
points)
Low – 75 feet
Moderate – 110 feet
High – 150 feet
No recommendations at this
time
Page 127 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 106
Wetland Characteristics Buffer Width by Impact
of Proposed Land Use
Other Measures
Recommended for
Protection
High level of function for water
quality improvement (8 to 9
points) and low for habitat (less
than 5 points)
Low – 50 feet
Moderate – 75 feet
High – 100 feet
No additional surface
discharges of untreated
runoff
Not meeting above
characteristics
Low – 50 feet
Moderate – 75 feet
High – 100 feet
No recommendations at this
time
Note:
See Table 29.25.030(8)(b) in this section, or as amended by Ecology, for types of
land uses that can result in low, moderate, and high impacts to wetlands.
(b) The Land Use Intensity Table describes the types of proposed land use that can result in
high, moderate, and low levels of impacts to adjacent wetlands.
Table 29.25.030(8)(b). Land Use Intensity Table
Level of Impact from
Proposed Change in
Land Use
Types of Land Use Based on Common Zoning
Designations
High
• Commercial
• Urban
• Industrial
• Institutional
Page 128 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 107
Level of Impact from
Proposed Change in
Land Use
Types of Land Use Based on Common Zoning
Designations
• Retail sales Mixed-use developments
• Residential (more than one unit/acre)
• Roads: federal and state highways, including on-ramps
and exits, state routes, and other roads associated with high-
impact land uses
• Railroads
• Agriculture with high-intensity activities (dairies,
nurseries, greenhouses, growing and harvesting crops
requiring annual tilling, raising and maintaining animals,
etc.
• Open/recreational space with high-intensity uses (golf
courses, ball fields, etc.)
• Solar farms (utility scale) Conversion to high-intensity
agriculture (dairies, nurseries, greenhouses, growing and
harvesting crops requiring annual tilling and raising and
maintaining animals, etc.)
• High-intensity recreation (e.g., golf courses and ball
fields)
• Hobby farms
Moderate • Residential (1 unit/acre or less)
Page 129 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 108
Level of Impact from
Proposed Change in
Land Use
Types of Land Use Based on Common Zoning
Designations
• Roads: Forest Service roads and roads associated with
moderate impact land uses
• Open/recreational space with moderate-intensity uses
(parks with paved trails or playgrounds, biking, jogging,
etc.)
• Agriculture with moderate-intensity uses (orchards, hay
fields, light or rotational grazing, etc.)
• Moderate-intensity open space (e.g., parks with biking and
jogging)
• Paved driveways and gravel driveways serving three or
more residences
• Paved trails
• Utility corridor or right-of-way shared used by several one
or more utilities and including access/maintenance road
•Wind Farm
Low
•Natural resource lands (forestry/silviculture–cutting of
trees only, not land clearing and removing stumps)
• Forestry (cutting of trees only)
• Low-intensity open space (e.g., hiking, bird-watching, and
preservation of natural resources)
Page 130 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 109
Level of Impact from
Proposed Change in
Land Use
Types of Land Use Based on Common Zoning
Designations
• Unpaved trails
• Utility corridor without a maintenance road and little or no
vegetation management
(c) Measuring Buffer Dimensions. Wetland buffers shall be measured horizontally in a
landward direction from the delineated wetland edge.
(d) Wetlands Adjacent to Slopes. Where lands adjacent to a wetland display a
continuous slope of 25 percent or greater, the buffer shall include such sloping areas.
Where the horizontal distance of the sloping area is greater than the required standard
buffer, the buffer shall be extended to a point 25 feet beyond the top of the bank of the
sloping area.
(9) Buffer Width Modifications.
(a) Administrative Buffer Width Averaging. The required buffer widths established in
this SMP may be modified by the Shoreline Administrator for a development on existing
legal lots of record in place at the time of adoption of this SMP.
Buffer widths may be modified in accordance with the provisions of this section only where
the applicant demonstrates all of the following:
(i) Averaging is necessary to avoid an extraordinary hardship to the applicant
caused by circumstances peculiar to the property;
(ii) The designated buffer area contains variations in sensitivity to ecological
impacts due to existing physical characteristics or the character of the buffer varies
in slope, soils, or vegetation;
(iii) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less than that
contained within the standard buffer prior to averaging;
(iv) The minimum buffer width at its narrowest point shall not be less than 65
percent of the required buffer width established under this SMP; and
(v) The buffer width averaging does not result in a net loss of ecological
function.
Page 131 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 110
(b) Wetland Buffer Reductions.
(i) For wetlands that score moderate or high for habitat function, the width of
the buffer can be reduced if the following criteria are met:
(A) A relatively undisturbed vegetative corridor of at least 100 feet in
width is protected between the wetland and any other priority habitats; and
(B) The protected area is preserved by means of easement, covenant or
other measure; and
(C) Measures identified in subsection (9)(b)(ii)(A) of this section are
taken to minimize the impact of any proposed land use.
(ii) For wetlands that score low for habitat function, the buffer width can be
reduced to that required for moderate land-use impacts by applying the following
measures to minimize the impacts of the proposed land uses:
(A) Wetland buffers may be administratively modified based on
reducing the intensity of impacts from land uses. Buffer widths required for
high-intensity land uses may be reduced to those required for moderate land
use intensity under the following conditions:
• Direct lights away from the wetland and buffer.
• Locate activities that generate noise away from the wetland and buffer.
• Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within 200 feet of a wetland.
• Implement integrated pest-management programs.
• Infiltrate or treat, detain and disperse runoff into buffer.
• Post signs at the outer edge of the critical area or buffer to clearly indicate
the location of the critical area according to the direction of the City.
• Plant buffer with native vegetation appropriate for the region to create
screens or barriers to noise, light, and human intrusion, as well as to
discourage domestic animal intrusion.
• Use low-impact development where appropriate.
• Establish a permanent conservation easement to protect the wetland and
the associated buffer.
(10) Compensatory Mitigation. As a condition of any development permit or approval, which
results in on-site loss or degradation of regulated wetlands and/or wetland buffers, the City may
require the applicant to provide compensatory mitigation to ensure no net loss of ecological
function and to offset impacts resulting from the actions of the applicant. The following standards
shall apply:
Page 132 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 111
(a) The mitigation shall be conducted on property that shall be protected and managed
to avoid further loss or degradation. The applicant shall provide for long-term preservation
of the mitigation area.
(b) Mitigation ratios shall be consistent with the following entitled Washington State
Department of Ecology manual; Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Part 1: Agency
Policies and Guidance (Version 12, 202106-06-011a, March 2006 Publication #21-06-003,
April) and Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans
(Version 1, Publication No. 06-06-011b, March 2006). See Table 29.25.030(13), Wetland
Mitigation Ratios for Eastern Washington.
(c) Mitigation shall follow an approved mitigation plan and reflect the
restoration/creation ratios specified above.
(d) The applicant shall enter into a wetland mitigation monitoring agreement with the
City as a condition of approval. The monitoring program will continue for at least eight
years from the date of plant installation. Monitoring will continue for 10 years where
woody vegetation (forested or shrub wetlands) is the intended result.
These communities take at least eight years after planting to reach 80 percent canopy
closure. Reporting for a 10-year monitoring period shall occur in years 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10.
Monitoring in all instances shall be bonded. Reporting results of the monitoring data to the
City is the responsibility of the applicant.
(e) Mitigation shall be completed prior to or concurrently with wetland loss, or, in the
case of an enforcement action, prior to continuation of the activity by the applicant.
(f) On-site mitigation is generally preferred over off-site mitigation.
(g) Off-site mitigation allows replacement of wetlands away from the site on which the
wetland has been impacted by a regulated activity. Off-site mitigation will be conducted in
accordance with the restoration/creation ratios described above and in Table 29.25.030(13),
Wetland Mitigation Ratios (for Eastern Washington). Off-site mitigation shall occur within
the same drainage basin as the wetland loss occurs; provided, that Category IV wetlands
may be replaced outside of the watershed if there is no reasonable alternative. Off-site
mitigation may be permitted where:
(i) On-site mitigation is not feasible due to hydrology, soils, or other factors.
(ii) On-site mitigation is not practical due to probable adverse impacts from
surrounding land uses or would conflict with a federal, state, or local public safety
directive.
(iii) Potential functional values at the site of the proposed restoration are greater
than the lost wetland functional values.
Page 133 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 112
(h) When the wetland to be altered is of a limited functional value and is degraded,
mitigation shall be of the wetland community types needed most in the location of
mitigation and those most likely to succeed with the highest functional value possible.
(i) Except in the case of cooperative mitigation projects in selecting mitigation sites,
applicants shall pursue locations in the following order of preference:
(i) Filled, drained, or cleared sites that were formerly wetlands and where
appropriate hydrology exists.
(ii) Upland sites adjacent to wetlands, if the upland is significantly disturbed and
does not contain a mature forested or shrub community of native species, and where
the appropriate natural hydrology exists.
(j) Where out-of-kind replacement is accepted, greater restoration/creation ratios may
be required.
(k) Construction of mitigation projects shall be timed to reduce impacts to existing
wildlife and plants. Construction shall be timed to ensure that grading and soil movement
occurs during the dry season, and planting of vegetation shall be specifically timed to the
needs of target species.
(11) Innovative Mitigation.
(a) One or more applicants, or an organization may undertake a mitigation project
together if it is demonstrated that all of the following circumstances exist:
(i) Creation of one or several larger wetlands may be preferable to many small
wetlands;
(ii) The group demonstrates the organizational and fiscal capability to act
cooperatively;
(iii) The group demonstrates that long-term management of the mitigation area
will be provided; and
(iv) There is a clear potential for success of the proposed mitigation at the
identified mitigation site.
(b) Wetland mitigation and banking programs shall be consistent with the provisions
outlined in the Department of Ecology’s publication Wetland Mitigation in Washington
State, Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance (Version 1, Publication No. 06 -06-011a,
March 2006) and Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Part 2: Developing Mitigation
Plans (Version 1, Publication No. 06-06-01b, March 2006).
Page 134 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 113
(i) Credits from a wetland mitigation bank may be approved for use as
compensation for unavoidable impacts to wetlands when:
(A) The bank is certified under Chapter 173-700 WAC;
(B) The Shoreline Administrator determines the wetland mitigation
bank provides appropriate compensation for the authorized impacts; and
(C) The proposed use of credits is consistent with the terms and
conditions of the bank’s certification.
(ii) Replacement ratios for projects using bank credits shall be consistent with
replacement ratios specified in the bank’s certification.
(iii) Credits from a certified wetland mitigation bank may be used to compensate
for impacts located within the service area specified in the bank’s certification. In
some cases, the service area of the bank may include portions of more than one
adjacent drainage basin for specific wetland functions.
(12) Mitigation Exceptions. Requirements for mitigation do not apply when a wetland alteration
is intended exclusively for the enhancement or restoration of an existing regulated wetland, and
the proposal will not result in a loss of wetland function and value, subject to the following
conditions:
(a) The enhancement or restoration project shall not be associated with a development
activity.
(b) A restoration plan shall be prepared and approved as described in subsection (13)
of this section.
(13) Restoration. Restoration is required when a wetland or its buffer has been alte red in
violation of this chapter. The following minimum performance standards shall be met for the
restoration of a wetland; provided, that if it can be demonstrated by the applicant that greater
functional and habitat values can be obtained, these standards may be modified:
(a) The original wetland configuration should be replicated, including depth, width,
and length at the original location.
(b) The original soil types and configuration shall be replicated.
(c) The wetland, including buffer areas, shall be replanted with native vegetation,
which replicates the original species, sizes, and densities.
(d) The original functional values shall be restored, including water quality and wildlife
habitat functions.
Page 135 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 114
(e) Required replacement ratios are shown in the Re-establishment or Creation column
of Table 29.25.030(13), Wetland Mitigation Ratios for Eastern Washington.
(f) A restoration plan shall be prepared and approved prior to commencement of
restoration work. Such a plan shall be prepared by a qualified wetland biologist and
describe how the proposed actions meet the minimum requirements described above. The
Shoreline Administrator shall, at the applicant’s expense, seek expert advice in determining
the adequacy of the Restoration Plan. Inadequate plans shall be returned to the applicant
for revision and resubmittal.
(14) Wetland mitigation ratios are provided in the Table 29.25.030(14).
Table 29.25.030(14). Wetland Mitigation Ratios for Eastern Washington
Category and
Type of
Wetland
ImpactsImpact
ed wetland
Re-
establishment
or Creation3
Rehabilitation
Only1
Re-
establishment
or Creation
an
d
Rehabilitation1
Re-
establishment
or Creation
an
d
Enhancement1
Preservation4
Enhancement
Only15
All Category IV
1.5:1
3:1
1:1 R/C and
1:1 RH
1:1 R/C and 2:1
E6:1
6:1
All Category III
2:1
4:1
1:1 R/C and
2:1 RH
1:1 R/C and 4:1
E8:1
8:1
All other
Category II
3:1
6:1
1:1 R/C and
4:1 RH
1:1 R/C and 8:1
E12:1
12:1
Category I based
on score for
functions
4:1
8:1
1:1 R/C and
6:1 RH
1:1 R/C and 12:1
E16:1
16:1
Category I
Natural Heritage
site
6:1
Rehabilitation
of a
Natural
R/C not
considered
possible2
R/C not
considered
possible2
Case-by-case
Page 136 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 115
Category and
Type of
Wetland
ImpactsImpact
ed wetland
Re-
establishment
or Creation3
Rehabilitation
Only1
Re-
establishment
or Creation
an
d
Rehabilitation1
Re-
establishment
or Creation
an
d
Enhancement1
Preservation4
Enhancement
Only15
Not
considered
possible2
Heritage site
Notes:
1 These ratios are based on the assumption that the rehabilitation or enhancement actions
implemented represent the average degree of improvement possible for the site. Proposals to
implement more effective rehabilitation or enhancement actions may result in a lower ratio, while
less effective actions may result in a higher ratio. The distinction between rehabilitation and
enhancement is not clear cut. Instead, rehabilitation and enhancement actions span a continuum.
Proposals that fall within the gray area between rehabilitation and enhancement will result in a
ratio that lies between the ratios for rehabilitation and the ratios for enhancement.Ratios reflect the
amount of compensation: amount of impact.
2 Natural Heritage sites, alkali wetland, and bogs are considered irreplaceable wetlands becaus e
they perform some functions that cannot be replaced through compensatory mitigation. Impacts to
such wetlands would therefore result in a net loss of some functions no matter what kind of
compensation is proposed. The category of impacted wetland is based on scores for functions.
Compensation ratios in this table generally do not apply when impacts involve a wetland whose
category is based on special characteristics. Compensation ratios and options for impacts to these
types of wetlands are discussed in Chapters 6B.5.1 to 6B.5.8.
Reference:
Washington State Department of Ecology, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10, March 2006 April 2021. Wetland Mitigation
in Washington State – Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance (Version 12). Washington State
Department of Ecology Publication No. 06-06-011a21-06-003. Olympia, Washington (2006).
E = Enhancement
R/C = Re-establishment or Creation
RH = Rehabilitation
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.520.]
Page 137 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 116
29.25.040 Fish and wildlife habitat.
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide a framework to evaluate the
development, design, and location of buildings to ensure that critical fish and wildlife habitat
within the shoreline jurisdiction is preserved and protected, in order to ensure no net loss of
ecological function and avoid habitat fragmentation. These regulations seek to protect critical
habitat areas so that populations of endangered, threatened, and sensitive species are given
consideration during the shoreline development review process.
(2) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Designation and Classification Criteria.
(a) Fish and wildlife habitat areas shall include the following:
Table 29.25.040(2)(a). Criteria for Classification of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas
Habitat Area Characteristic/Classification Source
(1) Areas with which state or federally
designated endangered, threatened, and
sensitive species have a primary association
WDFW, USFWS
(NOAA)
(2) Naturally occurring under 20 acres in size
and their submerged aquatic beds that provide
fish or wildlife habitat
Ecology
(3) Waters of the state classified as fish and
wildlife habitats under the Growth
Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW, and
WAC 365-190-080(5)(c)(v)
• Columbia River
• Snake River
WDNR, Ecology,
WDFW, affected
Indian tribes
(4) State Natural Area Preserves and Natural
Resource Conservation Areas
WDNR
Page 138 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 117
Habitat Area Characteristic/Classification Source
(5) Habitat areas of local importance as
determined by resolution of the City Council
WDFW
(b) All areas within the City of Pasco’s shoreline jurisdiction meeting one or more of
these criteria are hereby designated as critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this
section.
(c) Mapping information sources for identification of fish and wildlife habitat
conservation areas include, but are not limited to:
(i) WDFW Priority Habitat and Species Maps.
(ii) Wetlands mapped under the National Wetland Inventory by the U.S.
Department of Interior; USFWS.
(iii) WDFW/WDNR, Washington rivers inventory system maps.
(iv) Maps and reference documents in the City of Pasco SMP Inventory,
Analysis, and Characterization Report, as applicable.
(3) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Rating. Fish and wildlife habitat areas shall be rated as
primary or secondary according to the criteria in this section.
Table 29.25.040(3). Classification by Fish and Wildlife Areas
Habitat Area Classification Source
Primary habitats
Primary habitats are those areas that are valuable to fish and
wildlife and support a wide variety of species due to an
undisturbed nature, diversity of plant species, and structure,
presence of water, or size, location or seasonal importance and
which meet any of the following qualifying criteria:
(1) The documented presence of
species listed by the federal
WDFW, USFWS
(NOAA)
Page 139 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 118
Habitat Area Classification Source
government or State of Washington as
endangered, threatened, or sensitive.
(2) Those rivers identified as
shorelines of the state under the City of
Pasco Shoreline Master Program, and
streams within the shoreline
jurisdiction.
Ecology
(3) Those wetlands identified as
Category I Wetlands, as defined in this
title.
PMC 29.25.030(3),
Wetland Rating
(Classification)
Secondary
habitats
Secondary habitats are those which are valuable to wildlife and
support a wide variety of species due to an undisturbed nature,
diversity of plant species, structure, presence of water, or size,
location or seasonal importance, but do not meet any of the
qualifying criteria listed in items 1 through 3 in the Primary
Habitats above.
(4) Determination of Need for Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Detailed Study.
(a) A detailed study shall be required for any activity that is within 200 feet of a fish
and wildlife habitat area.
(b) Due to the sensitive nature of certain species, the applicant shall notify the City if
the proposed activity will occur within 660 feet (one-eighth of a mile) of a fish and wildlife
habitat area; the City may then contact appropriate agencies and determine if a detailed
study should be prepared, based on the sensitivity of the site.
(c) The Shoreline Administrator shall require a detailed study of a habitat area if the
following indicators are present:
(i) The area is listed in the City’s critical areas map as a fish and wildlife habitat
area;
Page 140 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 119
(ii) Documentation exists that shows that any of the classification criteria listed
in subsection (3) of this section are present, based on any of the references listed in
this section;
(iii) A qualified fish and wildlife biologist finds that habitat conditions
appropriate to meet one or more of the classification criteria listed above in
subsection (3) of this section exist; or
(iv) The Shoreline Administrator possesses a reasonable belief that a Fish and
Wildlife Habitat may exist. Such reasonable belief shall be supported by a site visit
and subsequent consultation with a qualified fish and wildlife biologist.
(5) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Detailed Study Requirements. If a fish and wildlife habitat
area detailed study is required, it shall include and/or meet the following requirements in addition
to the basic requirements identified in PMC 29.25.020(10).
(a) The detailed study shall be completed by a qualified fish and wildlife biologist with
expertise in assessing the relevant species and habitats. Evidence of qualifications shall be
provided with the detailed study.
(b) The site plan and map submitted shall be of a scale no smaller than one inch equals
200 feet. The site plan shall indicate all fish and wildlife habitat critical areas, as determined
by the criteria in subsection (3) of this section and shall include the area within 200 feet of
the subject property. The applicant may prepare the site plan; however, it is subject to
review by the qualified fish and wildlife biologist. The extent and boundaries of the habitat
shall be determined by the qualified fish and wildlife biologist.
(c) A habitat description shall be included, including a habitat rating as described in
subsection (3) of this section, and a statement of functions and values providing
information on the species in question and the associated plant and animal communities. A
complete list of species and special habitat features shall be included.
(d) A regulatory analysis shall be included, including a discussion of any federal, state,
tribal, and/or local requirements or special management recommendations developed
specifically for species and/or habitats located on the site.
(e) The proposed mitigation plan shall address how the proposed development activity
has been mitigated to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the habitat and shall follow
the general mitigation plan requirements described in subsection (3) of this section.
(f) A statement of management and maintenance practices shall be included, including
a discussion of ongoing maintenance practices that will ensure protection of all fish and
wildlife habitat conservation areas on site after the project has been completed.
Page 141 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 120
(g) Habitat and Buffer Recommendation. Riparian habitat areas: For the protection of
habitat along rivers, the buffer widths provided in Table 29.15.020(2), Shoreline
Development Standards Matrix apply.
(h) Habitats and species that have been identified as priority species or priority habitats
by the WDFW Priority Habitats and Species program should not be reduced and shall be
preserved through regulation, acquisition, incentives, and other techniques.
(6) Minimum Performance Standards Requirements. This section describes the minimum
performance standard requirements for habitat areas, including riparian habitats, anadromous
salmonids, and specific requirements for bald eagle habitat areas.
(a) Riparian Habitats.
(i) Buffer Requirements. Native vegetation standard buffers for activities
occurring adjacent to streams within fish and wildlife habitat areas shall be
maintained. Buffer widths shall be based on the extent of prior stream channel
modification. Riparian buffers are determined by whether or not a salmonid habitat
is present.
(ii) The buffer distances from the OHWM are provided in Table 29.15.020(2),
Shoreline Development Standards Matrix, apply.
(b) Bald Eagle Habitat. Bald eagle habitat shall be protected pursuant to the
Washington State bald eagle protection rules (WAC 232-12-292). A habitat management
plan shall be developed by the applicant in coordination with the WDFW whenever
activities that alter habitat are proposed near a verified nest territory or communal roost.
(c) Wetland Habitat. All habitat sites containing wetlands shall conform to the wetland
development performance standards set forth in PMC 29.25.030, Wetlands, and shall
conform to the wetland mitigation and restoration provisions set forth in PMC 29.25.030(9)
through (13).
(d) Anadromous Salmonids.
(i) Activities, uses, and alterations proposed to be located in water bodies used
by anadromous salmonids, or in areas that affect such water bodies, shall give
special consideration to the preservation and enhancement of anadromous salmonid
habitat, including, but not limited to, the following:
(A) Activities shall be timed to occur only during the allowable work
window, as designated by the WDFW;
(B) The activity is designed so that it will minimize the degradation of
the functions or values of the fish habitat or other critical areas; and
Page 142 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 121
(C) Any impact on the functions and values of the habitat conservation
area are mitigated in accordance with an approved detailed study.
(ii) Structures that prevent the migration of anadromous salmonids shall not be
allowed in the portion of the water bodies currently used by salmonids. Fish bypass
facilities shall be provided that allow the upstream migration of adult fish and
prevent juveniles migrating downstream from being trapped or harmed.
(iii) Fills waterward of the OHWM, when authorized, shall minimize the
adverse impacts on anadromous salmonids and their habitat, shall mitigate any
unavoidable impacts, and shall only be allowed for water-dependent uses or for
uses that enable public access or recreation for significant numbers of the public.
(7) Buffer Width Modifications.
(a) Administrative Buffer Width Averaging. The required buffer widths established in
this SMP may be modified by the Shoreline Administrator for a development on existing
legal lots of record in place at the time of adoption of this SMP, in accordance with the
provisions of this section only where the applicant demonstrates all of the following:
(i) Averaging is necessary to avoid an extraordinary hardship to the applicant
caused by circumstances peculiar to the property;
(ii) The designated buffer area contains variations in sensitivity to ecological
impacts due to existing physical characteristics or the character of the buffer varies
in slope, soils, or vegetation;
(iii) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less than that
contained within the standard buffer prior to averaging;
(iv) The minimum buffer width at its narrowest point shall not be less than 6575
percent of the required buffer width established under this SMP; and
(v) The buffer width averaging does not result in a net loss of ecological
function.
(b) Exception for Lots Adjacent to Pre-Existing Development. The required riparian
buffer width listed above shall not apply in cases where the adjacent pre-existing
development (vested prior to the effective date of this section) does not meet these
established standards. In such cases, the buffer may be reduced by one-third the difference
between the required buffer and the larger of the two adjacent buffers.
Adjacency in this situation shall be defined as being within 50 feet of the side property
lines. If there is only clearing on one side of the proposed activity within 50 feet of the side
property line, then the buffer can be reduced as described above.
Page 143 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 122
(c) Shoreline Buffer Reductions. Shoreline buffers may be administratively modified
as outlined below:
(i) Where a legally established road or railway, or other type of continuous
development, crosses or extends along a shoreline or critical area buffer and is
wider than 20 feet, the Shoreline Administrator may approve a modification of the
minimum required buffer width to the waterward edge of the improved continuous
development provided the upland side of the continuous development area:
(A) Does not provide additional protection of the shoreline, water body
or stream; and
(B) Provides little (less than 20 percent) to no biological, geological, or
hydrological buffer functions relating to the riparian and upland portions of
the buffer.
(ii) Standard Buffer Reduction. Reductions of up to 75 percent of the standard
required buffer may be approved if the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of
the Shoreline Administrator that a mitigation plan developed by a qualified
professional pursuant to PMC 29.25.020(13) indicates that enhancing the buffer (by
removing invasive plants or impervious surfaces, planting native vegetation,
installing habitat features, or other means) will result in a reduced buffer that
functions at a higher level than the existing standard buffer.
(8) Allowed Uses in Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas and Stream Buffers.
(a) Roads, Bridges, and Utilities. Road, bridge, and utility maintenance, repair, and
construction may be permitted across a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area and/or
buffers under the following conditions:
(i) It is demonstrated to the Shoreline Administrator that there are no
alternative routes that can be reasonably used to achieve the proposed development;
(ii) The activity will have minimum adverse impact to the fish and wildlife
habitat conservation area;
(iii) The activity will not significantly degrade surface or groundwater; and
(iv) The intrusion into the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area and its
buffers is fully mitigated to achieve no net loss of ecological functions.
(b) Limited park or recreational access to a fish and wildlife habitat area and/or stream
buffers; provided, that all of the following are satisfied:
(i) The access is part of a public park or a recreational resort development that
is dependent on the access for its location and recreational function;
Page 144 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 123
(ii) The access is limited to the minimum necessary to accomplish the
recreational function; and
(iii) The intrusion is fully mitigated to achieve no net loss of ecological
functions.
(c) Low-impact uses and activities that are consistent with the purpose and function of
the stream setback and do not detract from its integrity. Examples of low-impact uses and
activities include removal of noxious vegetation and storm water management facilities,
such as grass-lined swales.
(9) Additional Protection Measures.
(a) Temporary and permanent erosion and sedimentation controls shall be provided to
prevent the introduction of sediments or pollutants to water bodies or watercourses within
the habitat area.
(b) Clearing and grading shall be limited to that necessary for establishment of the use
or development and shall be conducted to avoid significant adverse impacts and minimize
the alteration of the volume, rate, or temperature of freshwater flows to or within the habitat
area and any buffer required by this section.
(c) The proposed development shall not discharge hazardous substances to the habitat
area that would have significant adverse impacts on that area.
(d) Stream flows shall be protected from changes to the normal flow, temperature,
turbidity, and discharge to the maximum extent practicable.
(e) Septic drainfields and any required replacement drainfield area shall be at least 100
feet from the edge of any habitat area.
(f) Exceptions to the above protection standards may be allowed by the Shoreline
Administrator based on a special report prepared by a qualified biological professional that
demonstrates that such exception would not adversely impact the habitat system, functions,
and values of the habitat area.
(g) Activities may only be permitted in a stream or stream buffer if the applicant can
show that the proposed activity will not degrade the functions and values of the stream,
stream buffer, or other critical area.
(h) Stream Crossings. Stream crossings shall be minimized, but when necessary, they
shall conform to the applicable provisions of this SMP and other laws (see WDFW or
Ecology).
Page 145 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 124
(i) Storm water conveyance facilities. Storm water conveyance facilities may be
permitted; provided, that they are only located in the buffer when no practicable alternative
exists outside the buffer. Storm water facilities shall be planted with native plantings where
feasible to provide habitat, and/or less intrusive facilities should be used.
(j) Floodway-Dependent Structures. Floodway-dependent structures or installations
may be permitted within streams or their buffers if allowed or approved by other ordinances
or other agencies with jurisdiction. See PMC 29.25.060, Flood hazard areas, for more
information on allowed uses and activities within flood hazard areas.
(k) Trails. The criteria for alignment, construction, and maintenance of trails within
wetlands and their buffers shall apply to trails within stream buffers. Outer buffer trails
may not exceed 20 feet in width and may be constructed with impermeable surface
materials if on-site infiltration is utilized.
(l) Utilities. The criteria for alignment, construction, and maintenance within the
wetland buffers and PMC 29.20.160, Utilities, shall apply to utility corridors within stream
buffers. In addition, corridors shall not be aligned parallel with any stream channel unless
the corridor is outside the buffer, and crossings shall be minimized. Installation shall be
accomplished by boring beneath the scour depth and hyporheic zone of the water body
where feasible. Crossings shall be contained within the existing footprint of an existing or
new road or utility crossing where possible. Otherwise, crossings shall be at an angle
greater than 60 degrees to the centerline of the channel. The criteria for stream crossings
shall also apply.
(m) Native vegetation landscaping schemes shall be provided that do not require
application of herbicides, pesticides, or fertilizer to maintain robust growth.
(n) No net-effective impervious surfaces may be created in the outer buffer area beyond
what is otherwise permitted.
(o) No structures or related improvements, including buildings or decks, shall be
permitted within the stream buffer, except as otherwise allowed in PMC 29.25.020,
General Provisions, or in this SMP. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.530.]
29.25.050 Aquifer recharge areas.
(1) Purpose. The purpose and intent of this section is to safeguard groundwater resources
within the shoreline jurisdiction from hazardous substance and hazardous waste pollution by
controlling or abating future pollution from new land uses or activities.
(2) Aquifer Recharge Area Designation Criteria.
(a) Aquifer recharge areas shall be classified as follows:
Table 29.25.050(2)(a). Designation of Aquifer Recharge Areas
Page 146 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 125
Aquifer Recharge Area
Characteristic/Designation Source
(1) Wellhead protection areas pursuant to
Chapter 246-290 WAC
WA Department of
Health, US
Environmental
Protection Agency
(2) Areas designated for special protection
pursuant to a groundwater management
program, Chapters 90.44, 90.48, and 90.54
RCW and Chapters 173-100 and 173-200
WAC
Ecology
(3) Areas overlying unprotected aquifers. Such
aquifers shall be identified through any existing
competent hydrogeologic study
USGS, WDNR
(4) Areas within identified unprotected aquifers
but possessing the following characteristics:
• Slopes less than 15 percent
• Coarse alluvium or sand and gravel in the soil
profile and no known impermeable layers
WDFW
(b) Any project area located within 200 feet of an area meeting the aquifer designation
or soil classification criteria, or mapped as such, shall be treated as if it is located within
the mapped area.
(c) All areas within the City of Pasco meeting these criteria, regardless of the presence
or lack of any formal identification as such, are hereby designated as critical areas and are
subject to the provisions of this title.
(3) Aquifer Recharge Area Classification.
Page 147 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 126
(a) Aquifer recharge areas are classified as high, moderate, or low significance aquifer
recharge areas according to the following criteria:
Table 29.25.050(3)(a). Classification of Aquifer Vulnerability
Vulnerability
Classification Documentation and Data Sources
High Vulnerability
High significance aquifer recharge areas are
areas with slopes of less than 15 percent
underlain by coarse alluvium or sand and
gravel
Moderate
Vulnerability
Moderate significance aquifer recharge areas
are:
(1) Areas with slopes of less than 15 percent
underlain by fine alluvium, silt, clay, glacial
till, or deposits from the Electron Mudflow
(2) Areas with slopes of 15 percent to 30
percent underlain by sand and gravel
Low Vulnerability
Moderate significance aquifer recharge areas
are:
(1) Areas with slopes of 15 percent to 30
percent underlain by silt, clay, or glacial till
(2) Areas with slopes greater than 30 percent
(4) Determination of Need for Aquifer Recharge Detailed Study.
(a) The following information resources shall be utilized along with other
documentation where noted:
Page 148 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 127
(i) Studies from the USGS;
(ii) City of Pasco wastewater facility plan;
(iii) Soil Survey for Franklin Conservation District.
(b) Requirements for High Significance Aquifer Recharge Area. An aquifer recharge
area detailed study shall be required for any activity occurring on or adjacent to a site that
is, or contains, a high significance aquifer recharge area if the activity involves one or more
of the following uses:
(i) Hazardous substance processing or handling;
(ii) Hazardous waste treatment and storage facility;
(iii) Disposal of on-site sewage for subdivisions, short plats, and commercial
and industrial sites; or
(iv) Landfills.
(5) Aquifer Recharge Area Detailed Study. When required as described in subsection (4) of
this section, an aquifer recharge area detailed study shall meet the following requirements:
(a) The detailed study shall be prepared by qualified consultant professional with
experience in preparing hydrogeologic assessments. Evidence of these qualifications shall
be provided with the detailed study.
(b) The detailed study shall contain a map, of a scale no smaller than one inch equals
200 feet, of the site and the extent of the high significance aquifer recharge area as
determined by the criteria in subsection (2) of this section.
(c) The detailed study shall contain a hydrogeologic assessment, including, at a
minimum:
(i) Information sources;
(ii) Geologic setting;
(iii) Background water quality;
(iv) Location of, and depth to, water tables;
(v) Recharge potential of the facility site;
(vi) Groundwater flow direction and gradient;
Page 149 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 128
(vii) Currently available data on wells within 1,000 feet of the site;
(viii) Currently available data on springs within 1,000 feet of the site;
(ix) Surface water location and recharge potential;
(x) Water source supply to the activity (e.g., high capacity well);
(xi) Any sampling schedules necessary;
(xii) Discussion of the effects of the proposed project on the groundwater
resource; and
(xiii) Other information as may be required by the City.
(d) The detailed study shall include a mitigation plan detailing how the activity will
offset any impact on the resource and control risk of contamination to the aquifer.
(6) Aquifer Recharge Area Detailed Study Special Exemptions. In addition to the exemptions
listed in PMC 29.25.020(3) and 29.35.080, Exemptions for shoreline substantial development
permits, sewer lines and appurtenances shall be exempt from the requirement to prepare an aquifer
recharge area detailed study.
(7) Performance Standards Basic Requirements.
(a) Any activity listed in PMC 29.25.050(4)(b) may only be permitted in a high
significance aquifer recharge area if the detailed study documents that the activity does not
pose a threat to the aquifer system and the proposed activity will not cause contaminants
to enter the aquifer.
(b) All activities located in an aquifer recharge area shall minimize the creation of
impervious surfaces to the extent practicable without creating a greater risk to the aquifer
recharge area.
(8) Storage Tanks. All Storage tanks located in an aquifer recharge area must conform to the
following requirements. Ecology also regulates and authorizes permits for underground storage
tanks (Chapter 173-360 WAC).
(a) Underground Tanks. All new underground storage facilities used or to be used for
the underground storage of hazardous substances or hazardous wastes shall be designed
and constructed so as to:
(i) Prevent releases due to corrosion or structural failure for the operational life
of the tank;
Page 150 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 129
(ii) Be protected against corrosion, constructed of noncorrosive material, steel
clad with a noncorrosive material, or designed to include a secondary containment
system to prevent the release or threatened release of any stored substances; and,
(iii) Use material in the construction or lining of the tank that is compatible with
the substance to be stored.
(b) Aboveground Tanks.
(i) No new aboveground storage facility or part thereof shall be fabricated,
constructed, installed, used, or maintained in any manner which may allow the
release of a hazardous substance to the soil, groundwater, or surface waters within
an aquifer recharge area.
(ii) No new aboveground tank or part thereof shall be fabricated, constructed,
installed, used, or maintained without having constructed around or under it an
impervious containment area enclosing or underlying the tank or part thereof.
(iii) New aboveground tanks will require a secondary containment system,
either built into the tank structure or a dike system built outside the tank, for all
tanks located within an aquifer recharge area. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970
§ 29.01.540.]
29.25.060 Flood hazard areas.
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to promote the public health, safety, and welfare of
the community by recognizing potential hazards that may be caused by development in areas where
severe flooding is anticipated to occur. The intent of this section is to assist with minimizing public
and private losses due to flood hazards by avoiding development in hazard areas within the
shoreline jurisdiction and/or implementing protective measures contained in this SMP.
(2) Classification. The following categories of frequently flooded areas are established for the
purposes of classification:
(a) Floodway. Floodways are defined as the channel of a stream and adjacent land
areas, which are required to carry and discharge flood waters or flood flows of any river or
stream associated with a regulatory flood.
(b) Special Flood Hazard Areas. The area adjoining the floodway, which is subject to
a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year as determined by the Federal
Insurance Administration.
(c) Floodplain. The floodway and special flood hazard areas.
These flood areas have been delineated based on studies completed by FEMA for the
National Flood Insurance Program.
Page 151 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 130
(3) Designation.
(a) All areas within the City meeting the frequently flooded designation criteria of
subsection (2) of this section are hereby designated critical areas and are subject to the
provisions of this section.
(b) The approximate location and extent of frequently flooded areas are shown on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) prepared for the City of Pasco and Franklin County
by FEMA, as part of the National Flood Insurance Program.
(4) Management. PMC Title 16, Buildings and Construction, and Chapter 24.20 PMC, Flood
Hazard Protection regulate proposed activities in all areas of special flood hazards. If allowed, any
structures permitted in the designated flood areas are subject to the floodproofing regulations
provided in PMC Title 16 and Chapter 24.20 PMC.
(5) Floodways. Special flood hazard areas established in this section are areas that are
extremely hazardous due to the velocity of flood waters, which carry debris, potential projectiles,
and erosion potential. The following provisions apply to special flood hazard areas:
(a) Prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial
improvements, and other development unless certification by a registered professional
engineer or architect is provided demonstrating that encroachments shall not result in an
increase in flood levels during the occurrence of the base flood discharge.
(b) If subsection (5)(a) of this section is satisfied, all new construction and substantial
improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of
Chapter 24.20 PMC. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.550.]
29.25.070 Geologic hazard areas.
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to reduce the threats to public health and safety
posed by geologic hazards within the shoreline jurisdiction. The intent is to reduce incompatible
development in areas of significant geologic hazard. Development incompatible with geologic
hazards may not only place itself at risk, but also may increase the hazard to surrounding
development. Some geologic hazards can be reduced or mitigated by engineering, design, or
modified construction or altering mining practices so risks to health and safety are minimized.
When technology cannot reduce the risks to acceptable levels, development in the hazard area is
best to be avoided.
(2) Geologic Hazard Area Designation. Geologic hazard areas within the City are those areas
that are susceptible to significant erosion, landslide, flood hazards, seismic hazards, and surface
mine collapse hazards. All areas within the City of Pasco meeting the criteria described in
subsection (3) of this section for known or suspected risk or unknown risk, regardless of the
presence or lack of any formal identification as such, are designated as critical areas and are subject
to the provisions of this section.
Page 152 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 131
(a) Volcanic Hazards. The GMA requires that volcanic hazards be addressed in local
critical area regulations. However, since no volcanic hazards exist in the City area, no
volcanic hazards regulations are needed.
(b) Flood Hazard Areas. Generally, areas subject to flood hazard conditions are
regulated by PMC 29.25.060 and the City of Pasco floodplain regulations (PMC Title 24),
which regulate those areas identified and classified by the FEMA on their Flood Hazard
Boundary/Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
(3) Geologic Hazard Area Classification and Designation Criteria.
(a) Geologic hazard area classification criteria are listed in the table below, along with
the source agencies that provide the guidelines for classification and designation:
Table 29.25.070(3)(a). Criteria for Classification of Geologic Hazard Areas
Hazard Area Classification and Designation Source
Erosion hazard
areas
Areas with soil type possessing erosion hazard
of “moderate to severe,” “severe,” or “very
severe.” (Classification based on both soil type
and slope)
NRCS
Landslide
hazard areas
Areas with slopes of 30 percent or greater and
with a vertical relief of 10 or more feet;
NRCS
Areas with slopes steeper than 15 percent on
hillsides intersecting geologic contacts with a
relatively permeable sediment overlying a
relatively impermeable sediment or bedrock
where springs or groundwater seepage is
present;
NRCS
Areas with slopes parallel or subparallel to
planes of weakness in subsurface materials
NRCS
Page 153 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 132
Hazard Area Classification and Designation Source
(e.g., bedding planes, joint systems, and fault
planes);
Areas with slopes having gradients steeper than
80 percent subject to rockfall during seismic
shaking;
NRCS
Alluvial fans or canyon bottoms presently or
potentially subject to inundation by debris
flows or catastrophic flooding;
NRCS
Areas that have shown movement during the
Holocene epoch or which are underlain or
covered by wastage debris of this epoch;
NRCS
Evidence of or risk from snow avalanches; NRCS
A “severe” limitation for building site
development due to slope conditions;
NRCS
Areas of historic failure, such as areas
designated as quaternary slumps, earthflows,
mudflows, lahars, or landslides on maps or
technical reports (e.g., topographic or geologic
maps, or other authorized documents).
USGS, WDNR, or
other government
agencies
Flood hazard
areas
Areas potentially unstable as a result of rapid
stream incision, stream bank erosion, and
Undercutting by wave action shall be addressed
as a flood hazard
PMC Title 24
Note:
Page 154 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 133
NRCS = U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
(4) Geologic Hazard Area Rating Criteria. All areas within the City shall be classified by the
following risk categories for each geologic hazard type:
Table 29.25.070(4). Rating of Geologic Hazard Risk
Risk Classification Documentation and Data Sources
Known or suspected
risk
Documentation or projection of the hazard by a
qualified expert exists
No risk Documentation or projection of the lack of a hazard by
a qualified expert exists
Risk unknown Data are not available to determine the presence or
absence of a geologic hazard
(5) Determination of Need for Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study. A geologic hazard area
detailed study shall be required if the following indicators are present:
(a) If the project area is listed in the City of Pasco Critical Areas Map as possessing
either a known or suspected risk for erosion, landslide, flood, seismic, or mine hazard.
(b) If the project area is listed in the City of Pasco Critical Areas Map as possessing an
unknown risk for erosion, landslide, flood, seismic, or mine hazard if any of the following
are identified by the applicant or City:
(i) A qualified geologist finds that any of the following exist: evidence of past
significant events of the hazard in question on or adjacent to the site; the presence
of necessary and sufficient factors for events of the hazard in question on or
adjacent to the site; or reasonable uncertainty concerning the hazard or the potential
for significant risk to or from the proposed activity; or
(ii) The Shoreline Administrator possesses a reasonable belief that a geologic
hazard may exist. Such reasonable belief shall be supported by a site visit and
subsequent consultation with a qualified geologist.
(6) Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study Requirements. The minimum requirements for a
geologic hazard area detailed study include the following in addition to the basic requirements
identified in PMC 29.25.020(10):
Page 155 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 134
(a) Basic Requirements. A geologic hazard area detailed study shall meet the
following:
(i) The detailed study shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer or
geologist. Evidence of qualifications shall be provided with the detailed study.
(ii) A map, of a scale no smaller than one inch equals 200 feet, of the site and
the extent of the geologic hazard area as determined by the criteria in subsection
(3) of this section.
(iii) An assessment of the geologic characteristics and engineering properties of
the soils, sediments, and/or rock of the subject property and potentially affected
adjacent properties, and a review of the site history regarding landslides, erosion,
and prior grading. The study shall include a soils analysis consistent with the
accepted regional taxonomic classification system, and a description of the
vulnerability of the site to seismic events. Documentation of data and methods shall
be included.
(iv) A geotechnical analysis, including a detailed description of the proposed
project, its relationship to the geologic hazard(s), and its potential impact upon the
hazard area, the subject property and affected adjacent properties shall be included.
(v) A mitigation plan, if appropriate, prepared by a professional engineer or
geologist under the supervision of a professional engineer qualified to prepare a
detailed study. The mitigation plan shall include a discussion on how the project
has been designed to avoid and minimize the impacts discussed in the geotechnical
analysis (see mitigation standards provided in PMC 29.25.020(13)). The plan shall
make a recommendation for the minimum building setbacks from any geologic
hazard based on the geotechnical analysis. The plan shall also address the potential
benefit of mitigation on the hazard area, the subject property, and affected adjacent
properties.
(vi) Where more than one geologic hazard exists within, adjacent to, or impacts,
or is impacted by, the activity site, then only one detailed study is required to be
completed to conduct a geologic hazard critical area review of the activity. The
critical area review report shall meet all of the requirements of each critical area
type, but may present a unified mitigation plan.
(vii) Where a valid geotechnical report has been prepared within the last five
years for a specific site, and where the proposed land use activity and surrounding
site conditions are unchanged, said report may be incorporated into the detailed
study. The applicant shall submit a geotechnical assessment detailing any changed
environmental conditions associated with the site.
Page 156 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 135
(b) Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. In addition to the requirements of subsection
(6)(a) of this section, an erosion hazard or landslide hazard area detailed study must also
meet the following requirements:
(i) The map shall depict the height of slope, slope gradient, and cross section
of the site. The site plan shall also include the location of springs, seeps, or other
surface expressions of groundwater. The site plan shall also depict any evidence of
surface or storm water runoff.
(ii) A description of load intensity, including surface and groundwater
conditions, public and private sewage disposal systems, fills and excavations, and
all structural development.
(iii) An estimate of slope stability and the effect construction and placement of
structures will have on the slope during the estimated life of the structure.
(iv) An estimate of the bluff retreat rate that recognizes and reflects potential
catastrophic events, such as seismic activity or a 100-year storm event.
(v) An assessment describing the extent and type of vegetative cover.
(vi) The geotechnical analysis shall specifically include:
(A) Slope stability studies and opinion(s) of slope stability;
(B) Proposed angles of cut and fill slopes and site grading requirements;
(C) Structural foundation requirements and estimated foundation
settlements;
(D) Soil compaction criteria;
(E) Proposed surface and subsurface drainage;
(F) Lateral earth pressures;
(G) Vulnerability of the site to erosion;
(H) Suitability of on-site soil for use as fill; and
(I) Building limitations.
(vii) Mitigation proposals shall include the location and methods of drainage,
surface water management, locations, and methods of erosion control, a vegetation
management and/or restoration plan, and/or other means for maintaining long-term
stability of slopes.
Page 157 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 136
(c) Flood Hazard Areas. Flood Hazard Areas are addressed through PMC 29.25.060,
Flood hazard areas, and the City of Pasco floodplain regulations (PMC Title 24). If
evidence exists that the proposed development area is subject to flood hazards that are not
indicated on the City’s Flood Hazard Boundary maps, and site characteristics do not
warrant an erosion or landslide hazard detailed study, the City may require additional
analysis and preparation of a mitigation plan to determine if the site is suitable for
development.
(d) Seismic Hazard Areas. In addition to the basic requirements, subsection (6)(a) of
this section, a detailed study for a seismic hazard critical area shall also meet the following
requirements:
(i) The site map shall show all known and mapped faults in the project vicinity.
(ii) The geotechnical analysis shall include a complete discussion of the
potential impacts of seismic activity reasonably probable on the site (e.g., forces
generated and fault displacement).
(e) Mine Hazard Areas. In addition to the basic requirements subsection (6)(a) of this
section, a detailed study for a mine hazard critical area shall also meet the following
requirements:
(i) The site plan shall delineate the existence of mine workings adjacent to or
abutting the site, or nearby mine workings, which may impact the site; and
(ii) The geotechnical analysis shall include a discussion of the potential for
subsidence on the site.
(f) Volcanic Hazard Areas. The City is located in an area of minimal risk from volcanic
hazard areas.
(7) Performance Standards Minimum Requirements. This section describes the minimum
performance standard requirements for geologic hazard areas.
(a) Basic Requirements.
(i) Alteration of geologic hazard critical areas is permitted only if the
development proposal can be designed so the hazard to the project and any increase
of hazard to adjacent property is eliminated or mitigated, and the development
proposal on the site is certified as safe by a geotechnical engineer licensed in the
State of Washington.
(ii) All proposals involving excavations and placement of fills shall be subject
to structural review under Chapter 33, Site Work, Demolition and Construction, of
the most current International Building Code.
Page 158 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 137
(iii) Essential public facilities as defined by RCW 36.70A.200 shall not be sited
within designated geologic hazard areas.
(b) Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing landslide or
erosion hazards shall also meet the following requirements:
(i) Alterations of the buffer and/or geologic hazard area may only occur for
activities meeting the following criteria:
(A) No reasonable alternative exists; and
(B) A geotechnical report is submitted and certifies that:
• The development will not significantly increase surface-water
discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond pre-
development conditions;
• The development will not decrease slope stability on adjacent
properties; and
• That such alterations will not adversely impact other critical areas.
(ii) A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan, prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the standard specification of the City of Pasco.
(iii) A drainage plan for the collection, transport, treatment, discharge and/or
recycle of water in accordance with the standard specifications of the City of Pasco.
(iv) Surface drainage shall not be directed across the face of a landslide hazard
area (including riverine bluffs or ravines). If drainage must be discharged from the
hazard area into adjacent waters, it shall be collected above the hazard and directed
to the water by a tightline drain and provided with an energy dissipating device at
the point of discharge.
(v) All infiltration systems, such as storm water detention and retention
facilities, and curtain drains utilizing buried pipe or French drain, are prohibited in
landslide hazard areas and their buffers unless a geotechnical report indicates such
facilities or systems or the failure of the same will not affect slope stability and the
systems are designed by a licensed civil engineer.
(vi) A minimum standard buffer width of 30 feet shall be established from the
top, toe, and all edges of landslide and erosion hazard areas. Existing native
vegetation shall be maintained. The buffer may be reduced to a minimum of 10 feet
when an applicant demonstrates the reduction will adequately protect the proposed
development, adjacent developments and uses, and the subject critical area. The
buffer may be increased by the Shoreline Administrator for development adjacent
to a river bluff or ravine, or in other areas that circumstances may warrant, where
Page 159 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 138
it is determined a larger buffer is necessary to prevent risk of damage to proposed
and existing development, as in the case where the area potentially impacted by a
landslide exceeds 30 feet.
(vii) On-site sewage disposal systems, including drainfields, shall be prohibited
within landslide and erosion hazard areas and related buffers.
(viii) Development designs shall meet the following basic requirements, unless it
can be demonstrated that an alternative design provides greater long-term slope
stability while meeting all other criteria of this section. The requirement for long-
term slope stability shall exclude designs that require periodic maintenance or other
actions to maintain their level of function. The basic development design standards
are:
(A) Structures and improvement shall be clustered to retain as much
open space as possible and to preserve the natural topographic features of
the site.
(B) Structures and improvements shall conform to the natural contour
of the slope, and foundations shall be tiered where possible to conform to
existing topography.
(C) Structures and improvements shall be located to preserve the most
critical portion of the site and its natural landforms and vegetation.
(D) The use of retaining walls that allow the maintenance of existing
natural slope area is preferred over graded artificial slopes.
(E) All development shall be designed to minimize impervious lot
coverage.
(c) Flood Hazard Areas. Activities in flood hazard areas shall comply with PMC
29.25.060, Flood hazard areas, and the City of Pasco floodplain regulations (PMC Title
24).
(d) Seismic Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing seismic hazards shall also
meet the following requirements:
(i) Mitigation is implemented, which reduces the seismic risk to a level
equivalent to that which the activity would experience if it were not located in a
seismic hazard area.
(ii) Structural development proposals shall meet all applicable provisions of
Chapter 16 of the most current edition of the International Building Code
(Structural Forces/Structural Design Requirements).
Page 160 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 139
(iii) No residential structures or essential public facility shall be located on a
Holocene fault line as indicated by USGS investigative maps and studies.
(e) Mine Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing mine hazards shall also meet the
following requirements:
(i) Mitigation is implemented which reduces the risk from mine hazards to a level
equivalent to that which the activity would experience if it were not located in a mine
hazard area.
(f) Volcanic Hazard Areas. No additional requirements.
(8) Long-Term Mitigation and Restoration Standards.
(a) The mitigation plan shall specifically address how the activity maintains or reduces
the pre-existing level of risk to the site and adjacent properties on a long-term basis (equal
to or exceeding the projected lifespan of the activity or occupation). Mitigation techniques
providing long-term hazard reduction are those that do not require periodic maintenance or
other actions to maintain their function.
(b) Mitigation may be required to avoid any increase in risk above the pre-existing
conditions following abandonment of the activity.
(c) Any required restoration shall meet the long-term hazard reduction standards. In
the case of restoration, long-term shall be defined as the equivalent of natural function.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.560.]
Chapter 29.30
EXISTING USES, STRUCTURES, AND LOTS
Sections:
29.30.010 Applicability.
29.30.020 Nonconforming uses.
29.30.030 Nonconforming structures.
20.30.040 Nonconforming lots.
29.30.010 Applicability.
(1) All nonconformances in shoreline jurisdiction shall be subject to the provisions of this
chapter. For nonconformance of use, structures, and lots within shoreline critical areas, Chapter
29.25 PMC, Critical Areas, applies. When there is a conflict between this section and the critical
areas section as applicable to critical areas, the more restrictive standards shall apply.
(2) The provisions of this SMP do not supersede or relieve a property owner from compliance
with:
Page 161 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 140
(a) The requirements of the International Building and Fire Codes; or
(b) The provisions of the SMP beyond the specific nonconformance addressed by this
chapter.
(3) A change in the required permit review process (e.g., shoreline substantial development
permit versus a shoreline special use permit) shall not create a nonconformance.
(4) Any nonconformance that is brought into conformance for any period of time shall forfeit
status as nonconformance, except as specified in PMC 29.30.020, Nonconforming Uses.
(5) A nonconforming lot, use, or structure may be deemed legally nonconforming by providing
documentation that the use in question occurred prior to the effective date of this SMP, from two
of the following:
(a) Local agency permit;
(b) Orthophotograph, aerial photograph, or planimetric mapping recognized as
legitimate by the agency; or
(c) Tax record.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.600.]
29.30.020 Nonconforming uses.
(1) If, at the effective date of the SMP and any amendment thereto, a lawful use of land exists
that is made no longer permissible under the terms of this SMP, or amendments thereto, such use
may be continued as a nonconforming use so long as it remains otherwise lawful subject to the
following conditions:
(a) No nonconforming use shall be intensified, enlarged, increased, or extended to
occupy a greater area of land than was occupied on the effective date of the SMP or the
amendment that made the use no longer permissible; provided that a nonconforming use
may be enlarged, increased, or extended in conformance with applicable bulk and
dimensional standards of this SMP upon approval of a shoreline special use permit.
(b) No nonconforming use shall be moved in whole or in part to any other portion of
the lot that contains the nonconforming use.
(c) If any nonconforming use of land ceases for any reason for a period of one year or
more, any subsequent use of such land shall conform to the regulations specified by this
SMP for the use environment in which such land is located.
Page 162 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 141
(d) A structure, which is being or has been used for a nonconforming use, may be used
for a different nonconforming use only upon a finding that:
(i) No reasonable alternative conforming use is practical;
(ii) The proposed use is equally or more appropriate to the shoreline
environment than the existing nonconforming use, and is at least as consistent with
the policies and provisions of the Act and the SMP; and
(iii) Such a change of use shall be subject to a shoreline special use permit
approval. Conditions may be attached to the permit as are deemed necessary to
ensure compliance with the above findings and the requirements of the SMP and
the SMA, and to ensure that the use will not become a nuisance or a hazard.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.610.]
29.30.030 Nonconforming structures.
(1) If, at the effective date of the SMP or any amendment thereto, a lawful structure or other
improvement exists, which is made no longer permissible under the terms of this SMP or
amendment thereto, such structure or other improvement may be continued as a nonconforming
structure or other improvement so long as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the following
conditions:
(a) No nonconforming structure or other improvement shall be altered or changed in a
way which increases its nonconformity except as allowed in subsection (1)(b) of this
section.
(b) Expansions of structures that are nonconforming with respect to a required
shoreline buffer:
(i) May not encroach any farther waterward into the required shoreline buffer.
(ii) Expansions parallel to or landward of shoreline may be allowed; provided,
that said enlargement does not increase the extent of nonconformity by farther
encroaching upon or extending into areas where construction or use would not be
allowed for new development or uses.
(c) All expansion, extension, maintenance, or repair activities of nonconforming
structures or improvements shall be consistent with all other provisions of this SMP;
provided, that the cumulative cost of such maintenance or repair shall not exceed 20 percent
of the assessed valuation of such building, structure, or land (as applicable) at the time such
maintenance is completed.
(d) When damaged, a nonconforming structure may be restored to the configuration
existing immediately prior to the time that the structure was damaged; provided, that:
Page 163 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 142
(i) The structure is damaged to an extent not exceeding 50 percent of the
replacement cost of the original development.
(ii) The applicant applies for permits needed to restore the development within
six months of the date the damage occurred.
(iii) Reconstruction is started within 12 months and is completed within 24
months of the date of damage, unless an extension of time is g ranted by the
Shoreline Administrator upon written petition substantiating to the satisfaction of
the Administrator due cause for such extension.
(iv) The degree of the nonconforming use, building, or structure is not increased.
(e) Nothing in this section will prohibit vertical expansion up to the height allowed in
the applicable use environment, provided all other applicable requirements of City’s
development regulations are met.
(f) Upkeep, repairs, and maintenance of a nonconforming structure or other
improvement shall be permitted.
(2) Should such structure or other improvement be moved for any reason for any distance, it
shall thereafter conform to the regulations for the use environment in which it is located.
Conformance shall be required when:
(a) A change of use is proposed;
(b) The use is terminated or discontinued for more than one year, or the structure(s)
that houses the use is vacated for more than one year; or
(c) The structure(s) or activity that occurs on the land in which the use is conducted is
proposed for relocation.
(3) Residential structures and appurtenant structures that were legally established and are used
for a conforming use, but that do not meet standards for the following, shall be considered a
conforming structure: setbacks, buffers, or yards; area; bulk; height; or density.
(4) For purposes of this section, “appurtenant structures” refer to garages, sheds, and other
legally established structures. Appurtenant structures do not include bulkheads and other shoreline
modifications or overwater structures.
29.30.040 Nonconforming lots.
(1) A nonconforming lot may be developed if permitted by other land use regulations of the
local government and so long as such development conforms to all other requirements of the
applicable master program and the act.
Page 164 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 143
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.620.]
Chapter 29.35
ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT
Sections:
29.35.010 Roles and responsibilities.
29.35.020 Interpretation.
29.35.030 Statutory noticing requirements.
29.35.040 Application requirements.
29.35.050 Shoreline substantial development permits.
29.35.060 Shoreline special use permits.
29.35.070 Shoreline variance permits.
29.35.080 Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permits.
29.35.090 Duration of permits.
29.35.100 Initiation of development.
29.35.110 Review process.
29.35.120 Appeals.
29.35.130 Amendments to permits.
29.35.140 Enforcement.
29.35.150 Cumulative effects of shoreline developments.
29.35.160 Amendments to shoreline master program.
29.35.170 Shoreline environment designation maps or official shoreline map.
29.35.010 Roles and responsibilities.
(1) Shoreline Administrator.
(a) The Community and Economic Development Director of the City of Pasco or
his/her designee shall serve as the Shoreline Administrator. The Shoreline Administrator
shall issue written shoreline exemptions as appropriate, and, in the case of a shoreline
substantial development permit, grant or deny the permit. The Shoreline Administrator
shall administer the shoreline permit and notification systems, and shall be responsible for
coordinating the administration of shoreline regulations with zoning enforcement, building
permits, and all other regulations regarding land use and development in the City.
(b) The Shoreline Administrator shall be familiar with regulatory measures pertaining
to shorelines and their use, and, within the limits of his or her authority, shall cooperate in
the administration of these measures. Permits issued under the provisions of this shoreline
regulation shall be coordinated with other applicable land use and development regulatory
measures of the City. The Shoreline Administrator shall establish procedures that advise
all parties seeking building permits or other development authorization of the need to
consider possible shoreline applications. It is the intent of the City, consistent with its
Page 165 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 144
regulatory obligations, to simplify and facilitate the processing of shoreline substantial
development permits.
(c) The Shoreline Administrator shall ensure that proposed regulatory or
administrative actions do not unconstitutionally infringe upon private property rights.
Shoreline goals and policies should be pursued through the regulation of development of
private property only to an extent that is consistent with all relevant constitutional and other
legal limitations (where applicable, statutory limitations, such as those contained in
Chapter 82.02 RCW and RCW 43.21C.060) on the regulation of private property.
(d) The Shoreline Administrator shall apply PMC 29.25.010, Critical Areas.
(2) Hearing Examiner.
(a) The Hearing Examiner shall have the authority to decide on appeals from
administrative decisions issued by the Shoreline Administrator of this SMP.
(b) The Hearing Examiner may grant or deny shoreline variances following a public
hearing.
(c) The Hearing Examiner shall have authority to review and approve or deny shoreline
special use permits following an open record hearing pursuant to PMC 25.210.080.
(3) Planning Commission. The Planning Commission is vested with the responsibility to
review the SMP as part of regular SMP updates required by RCW 90.58.080 as a major element
of the City’s planning and regulatory program and make recommendations for amendments thereof
to the City Council.
(4) City Council. The City Council is vested with authority to:
(a) Initiate an amendment to this SMP according to the procedures prescribed in WAC
173-26-100.
(b) Adopt all amendments to this SMP, after consideration of the recommendation of
the Planning Commission. Substantive amendments shall become effective immediately
upon adoption by Ecology.
(c) Conduct closed record appeal of any recommendation of the Hearing Examiner
pursuant to PMC 25.210.070.
(d) Decide on appeals from the administrative decisions issued by the Shoreline
Administrator.
[Ord. 4496A § 13, 2020; Ord. 4496 § 13, 2020; Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.700.]
Page 166 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 145
29.35.020 Interpretation.
(1) Under the administrative provisions, the Shoreline Administrator shall have authority to
interpret this SMP, when such interpretation is clearly consistent with the goals and policies of this
SMP and the SMA.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator shall consult with Ecology if formal written interpretations
are developed as a result of a lack of clear guidance in the SMA, the SMP guidelines, or this SMP
to ensure that any are consistent with the purpose and intent of Chapter 90.58 RCW and Chapter
173-26 WAC.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.710.]
29.35.030 Statutory noticing requirements.
(1) At a minimum, the Shoreline Administrator shall provide notice in accordance with WAC
173-27-110 and may provide for additional noticing requirements.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.720.]
29.35.040 Application requirements.
(1) A complete application for a shoreline substantial development, shoreline special use, or
shoreline variance permit shall contain, at a minimum, the information listed in WAC 173-27-180.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator shall provide written informational materials, procedures,
instructions, and forms required to submit an application for a shoreline substantial development
permit, variance permit, or special use permit.
(3) These materials should include: a plan coversheet; a joint aquatic resource permits
application (JARPA) form; a SEPA checklist; a fee schedule; review criteria; and the process and
timelines to assist potential applicants and interested parties on the permit application submittal
and review process.
(4) The Shoreline Administrator may vary or waive these requirements according to
administrative application requirements on a case-by-case basis.
(5) The Shoreline Administrator may require additional specific information depending on the
nature of the proposal and the presence of sensitive ecological features or issues related to
compliance with other applicable requirements and the provisions of this SMP.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.730.]
Page 167 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 146
29.35.050 Shoreline substantial development permits.
(1) A shoreline substantial development permit shall be required for all development on
shorelines, unless the proposal is specifically exempted per PMC 29.35.080. Shoreline substantial
development permits shall be processed as an administrative permit.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator shall review substantial development permit applications, as
required in PMC 29.35.040, and approve or deny the permit.
(3) The Shoreline Administrator shall provide notice in accordance with WAC 173-27-110
and may provide additional notice, according to the City’s noticing requirements.
(4) A shoreline substantial development permit shall be granted only when the development
proposed is consistent with:
(a) The policies and procedures of the SMA, Chapter 90.58 RCW;
(b) The applicable provisions of Chapter 173-27 WAC; and
(c) This SMP.
(5) The Shoreline Administrator may attach conditions to the approval of permits as necessary
to ensure consistency of the project with the SMA and this SMP.
(6) Nothing shall interfere with the City’s ability to require compliance with all other
applicable plans and laws.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.740.]
29.35.060 Shoreline special use permits.
(1) Uses specifically classified or set forth in this SMP as conditional uses shall be subject to
review and condition by the Shoreline Administrator and Ecology. Applications for a shoreline
special use permit shall be processed pursuant to Chapter 25.200 PMC.
(2) Other uses, which are not classified or listed or set forth in this SMP, may be authorized as
conditional uses; provided, the applicant can demonstrate consistency with the requirements of
this Section and the requirements for conditional uses contained in this SMP.
(3) Uses that are specifically prohibited by this SMP may not be authorized as a conditional
use.
(4) Review Criteria for Shoreline Special Use Permit. Uses that are classified or set forth in
the applicable SMP as conditional uses may be authorized provided that the applicant demonstrates
all of the following:
Page 168 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 147
(a) That the proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the
SMP;
(b) That the proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of public
shorelines;
(c) That the proposed use of the site and design of the project are compatible with other
authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the Comprehensive
Plan and SMP;
(d) That the proposed use will cause no significant adverse effects to the shoreline
environment in which it is to be located; and
(e) That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect.
(5) In the granting of all shoreline special use permits, consideration shall be given to the
cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. For example, if shoreline
special use permits were granted for other developments in the area where similar circumstances
exist, the total of the conditional uses shall also remain consistent with the policies of RCW
90.58.020 and shall not produce substantial adverse effects to the shoreline environment.
(6) In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached to the permit by the
City or Ecology to prevent undesirable effects of the proposed use and/or to ensure consistency of
the project with the SMA and this SMP.
(7) Nothing shall interfere with the City’s ability to require compliance with all other
applicable plans and laws.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.750.]
29.35.070 Shoreline variance permits.
(1) The purpose of a variance is to grant relief to specific bulk, dimensional, or performance
requirements set forth in this SMP where there are extraordinary or unique circumstances relating
to the property such that the strict implementation of this SMP would impose unnecessary
hardships on the applicant or thwart the policies set forth in RCW 90.58.020. Variances from the
use regulations of the SMP are prohibited. Applications for shoreline variance permits shall be
processed pursuant to PMC 25.195.020 and subsection (2) of this section.
(2) Review Criteria.
(a) Shoreline variance permits should be granted in circumstances where denial of the
permit would result in a thwarting of the policy enumerated in RCW 90.58.020. In all
instances, the applicant must demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances shall be shown
and the public interest shall suffer no substantial detrimental effect.
Page 169 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 148
(b) Shoreline variance permits for development and/or uses that will be located
landward of the OHWM, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(b), and/or landward of any
wetland, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(h), may be authorized provided the applicant
can demonstrate all of the following:
(i) That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional, or performance
standards set forth in the SMP precludes, or significantly interferes with, reasonable
use of the property;
(ii) That the hardship described in subsection (2)(b)(i) of this subsection is
specifically related to the property and is the result of unique conditions, such as
irregular lot shape, size, or natural features, and the application of the SMP, and
not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant’s own actions;
(iii) That the design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses
within the area and with uses planned for the area under the Comprehensive Plan
and SMP and will not cause adverse impacts on the shoreline environment;
(iv) That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege not
enjoyed by the other properties in the area;
(v) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to afford relief; and
(vi) That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect.
(c) Shoreline variance permits for development and/or uses that will be located
waterward of the OHWM, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(b), or within any wetland, as
defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(h), may be authorized provided the applicant can
demonstrate all of the following:
(i) That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional, or performance
standards set forth in the applicable SMP precludes all reasonable use of the
property;
(ii) That the proposal is consistent with the criteria established under
subsections (2)(b)(i) through (2)(b)(iv) of this section; and
(iii) That the public rights of navigation and use of the shorelines will not be
adversely affected.
(d) In the granting of all shoreline variance permits, consideration shall be given to the
cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. For example, if
variances were granted to other developments and/or uses in the area where similar
circumstances exist, the total of the variances shall also remain consistent with the policies
of RCW 90.58.020 and shall not cause substantial adverse effects to the shoreline
environment.
Page 170 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 149
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.760.]
29.35.080 Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permits.
(1) An exemption from the shoreline substantial development permit process is not an
exemption from compliance with the SMA or this SMP, or from any other regulatory requirements.
All proposed uses, activities, or development occurring within shoreline jurisdiction must conform
to the intent and requirements of Chapter 90.58 RCW, the SMA, and this SMP, whether or not a
permit or other form of authorization is required.
(2) Letters of exemption shall be issued by the Shoreline Administrator when an exemption
applies or when a letter of exemption is required by the provisions of WAC 173-27-050 and as
follows:
(a) Any person claiming exemption from the substantial development permit
requirements shall make an application to the Shoreline Administrator for such an
exemption in the manner prescribed by the Shoreline Administrator, except that no written
statement of exemption is required for emergency development pursuant to WAC 173-27-
040(2)(d).
(b) The Shoreline Administrator is authorized to grant or deny requests for statements
of exemption from the shoreline substantial development permit requirement for uses and
developments within shorelines that are specifically listed in subsection (4) of this section.
The statement shall be in writing and shall indicate the specific exemption of this SMP that
is being applied to the development and shall provide a summary of the Shoreline
Administrator’s analysis of the consistency of the project with this SMP and the SMA. The
letter shall be sent to the applicant and maintained on file in the offices of the Shoreline
Administrator.
(c) Statements of exemption may contain conditions and/or mitigating measures of
approval to achieve consistency and compliance with the provisions of this SMP and the
SMA.
(d) A denial of an exemption shall be in writing and shall identify the reason(s) for the
denial. The Shoreline Administrator’s decision may be appealed pursuant to PMC
29.35.120, Appeals.
(e) Exempt activities requiring a JARPA shall not be conducted until a statement of
exemption has been obtained from the Shoreline Administrator.
(3) Interpretations of Exemptions.
(a) Exemptions shall be construed narrowly. Only those developments that meet the
precise terms of one or more of the listed exemptions may be granted exemption from the
shoreline substantial development permit process.
Page 171 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 150
(b) A development or use that is listed as a conditional use pursuant to this SMP, or is
an unlisted use, must obtain a shoreline special use permit even though the development or
use does not require a shoreline substantial development permit. When a development or
use is proposed that does not comply with the bulk, dimensional, and performance
standards of this SMP, such development or use can only be authorized by approval of a
shoreline variance permit.
(c) The burden of proof that a development or use is exempt from the permit process
is on the applicant.
(d) If any part of a proposed development is not eligible for exemption, then a shoreline
substantial development permit is required for the entire proposed development project.
(e) The Shoreline Administrator may attach conditions to the approval of exempted
developments and/or uses as necessary to ensure consistency of the project with the SMA
and this SMP. Additionally, nothing shall interfere with each responsible local
government’s ability to require compliance with all other applicable laws and plans.
(4) The City shall exempt from the shoreline substantial development permit requirement the
shoreline developments listed below:
(a) Any development of which the total cost or fair market value does not exceed
$6,416 eight thousand five hundred four dollars ($8,504) or as adjusted by the State Office
of Financial Management, if such development does not materially interfere with the
normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state. For purposes of determining
whether or not a permit is required, the total cost or fair market value shall be based on the
value of development that is occurring on shorelines of the state as defined in RCW
90.58.030(2)(c). The total cost or fair market value of the development shall include the
fair market value of any donated, contributed, or found labor, as well as equipment, or
materials.
(b) Normal maintenance or repair of existing legally established structures or
developments, including damage by accident, fire, or elements. Replacement of a structure
or development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common
method of repair for the type of structure or development and the replacement structure or
development is comparable to the original structure or development, including, but not
limited to, its size, shape, configuration, location, and external appearance and the
replacement does not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline resources or
environment.
(c) Construction of a normal protective bulkhead common to single-family residences.
A normal protective bulkhead includes those structural and nonstructural developments
installed at or near, and parallel to, the OHWM for the sole purpose of protecting an
existing single-family residence and appurtenant structures from loss or damage by
erosion. A normal protective bulkhead is not exempt if constructed for the purpose of
Page 172 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 151
creating dry land. When a vertical or nearly vertical wall is being constructed or
reconstructed, not more than one cubic yard of fill per one foot of wall may be used as
backfill. When an existing bulkhead is being repaired by construction of a vertical wall
fronting the existing wall, it shall be constructed no farther waterward of the existing
bulkhead than is necessary for construction of new footings. When a bulkhead has
deteriorated such that an OHWM has been established by the presence and action of water
landward of the bulkhead, then the replacement bulkhead must be located at or near the
actual OHWM. Bioengineered erosion control projects may be considered a normal
protective bulkhead when any structural elements are consistent with the above
requirements and when the project has been approved by WDFW.
(d) Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the
elements. An emergency is an unanticipated and imminent threat to public health, safety,
or the environment that requires immediate action within a time too short to allow full
compliance with this SMP. Emergency construction does not include development of new
permanent protective structures where none previously existed. Where new protective
structures are deemed by the Shoreline Administrator to be the appropriate means to
address the emergency situation, and upon abatement of the emergency situation, the new
structure shall be removed, or any permit that would have been required, absent an
emergency, pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, these regulations, or this SMP, shall be
obtained. All emergency construction shall be consistent with the policies and requirements
of this section, Chapter 90.58 RCW, and this SMP. As a general matter, flooding or other
seasonal events that can be anticipated and may occur but that are not imminent are not an
emergency.
(i) The following criteria shall exist to qualify any action under an emergency
provision:
(A) There must be an immediate threat to life, or public or private property,
or an immediate threat of serious environmental degradation arising from a
natural condition, or nonnatural accident or incident;
(B) The emergency response shall be confined to the action necessary to
protect life or property from damage;
(C) The scope of the emergency response must be limited to the work
necessary to relieve the immediate threat; and
(D) The emergency response applies only to the period of time in which
the actual emergency exists.
(ii) Once the emergency is abated or dissipated as deemed by jurisdictional
authorities, compliance with the requirements of this section is required.
(iii) Emergency actions shall use reasonable methods that minimize the impact
to critical areas and their buffers. Persons who take emergency action shall notify
Page 173 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 152
the Shoreline Administrator within one working day following commencement of
the emergency activity. Following such notification, the Shoreline Administrator
shall determine if the action taken was within the scope and definition of em ergency
actions as defined above. If the Shoreline Administrator determines the action taken
or any part of the action taken was beyond the scope and definition of allowed
emergency actions, then the enforcement provisions of PMC 29.35.140 shall apply.
(e) Construction and practices normal or necessary for farming, irrigation, and
ranching activities, including agricultural service roads and utilities on shorelands and the
construction and maintenance of irrigation structures, including but not limited to head
gates, pumping facilities, and irrigation channels. A feedlot of any size, all processing
plants, other activities of a commercial nature, and alteration of the contour of the
shorelands by leveling or filling, other than that which results from normal cultivation,
shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or ranching activities.
(f) Construction or modification of navigational aids, such as channel markers and
anchor buoys.
(g) Construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-
family residence or appurtenance for their own use or for the use of their family, which
residence does not exceed a height of 35 feet above average grade level and which meets
all requirements of the City, other than requirements imposed pursuant to Chapter 90.58
RCW. Construction authorized under this exemption shall be located landward of the
OHWM.
(h) Construction of a dock, including a community dock designed for pleasure craft
only and for the private non-commercial use of the owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of
a single-family or multiple-family residence. A dock is a landing and moorage facility for
watercraft and does not include recreational decks, storage facilities or other
appurtenances. This exception applies when the fair market value of the dock does not
exceed:
i. Twenty-two thousand five hundred dollars ($22,500) for docks that are
constructed to replace existing docks, are of equal or lesser square footage than the
existing dock being replaced; or
ii. Eleven thousand two hundred ($11,200) dollars for all other docks
constructed in fresh waters.
iii. $10,000, but if subsequent construction having a fair market value
exceeding $2,500 occurs within five years of completion of the prior construction,
the subsequent construction shall be considered a substantial development for the
purpose of this section.However, if subsequent construction occurs within five
years of completion of the prior construction, and the combined fair market value
of the subsequent and prior construction exceeds the amount specified above, the
Page 174 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 153
subsequent construction shall be considered a substantial development for the
purpose of this chapter.
(i) Operation, maintenance, repair, or construction of canals, waterways, drains,
reservoirs, or other facilities that now exist or are hereafter created or developed as a part
of an irrigation system for the primary purpose of making use of system waters, including
return flow and artificially stored groundwater from the irrigation of lands.
(j) The marking of property lines or corners on state-owned lands, when such marking
does not significantly interfere with normal public use of the surface of the water.
(k) Operation and maintenance of existing and future systems of dikes, drains, or other
facilities existing on September 8, 1975, where water is being drained from irrigation
runoff or shallow groundwater levels artificially recharged through irrigation, and that are
created, developed or utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or diking
system.
(l) Any project with a certification from the Governor pursuant to Chapter 80.50 RCW
(certification from the State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council).
(m) Site exploration and investigation activities that are prerequisite to preparation of an
application for development authorization under this section, if:
(i) The activity does not interfere with the normal public use of surface waters;
(ii) The activity will have no significant adverse impact on the environment,
including, but not limited to, fish, wildlife, fish or wildlife habitat, water quality,
and aesthetic values;
(iii) The activity does not involve the installation of any structure and, upon
completion of the activity, the vegetation and land configuration of the site are
restored to conditions existing before the activity; and
(iv) A private entity seeking development authorization under this section first
posts a performance bond or provides other evidence of financial responsibility to
the local jurisdiction to ensure that the site is restored to pre-existing conditions.
(n)(m) The process of removing or controlling aquatic noxious weeds, as defined in RCW
17.26.020, through the use of an herbicide or other treatment methods applicable to weed
control published by the Departments of Agriculture or Ecology jointly with other state
agencies under Chapter 43.21C RCW.
(o)(n) Watershed restoration projects as defined in RCW 89.08.460.
Page 175 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 154
(p) (o) A public or private project that is designed to improve fish or wildlife habitat or
fish passage when all of the following apply: consistent with RCW 90.58.147 and RCW
77.55.
(i) The project has been approved by WDFW;
(ii) The project has received HPA (hydraulic project approval) by WDFW
pursuant to Chapter 77.55 RCW;
(iii) The City has determined that the project is substantially consistent with the
local SMP. The City shall make such determination in a timely manner and provide
it by letter to the applicant; and
(iv) Fish habitat enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of RCW
77.55.181 are determined to be consistent with local SMPs.
(q) Any person conducting a remedial action at a facility pursuant to a consent decree,
order, or agreed order issued pursuant to Chapter 70.105D RCW or to Ecology when it
conducts a remedial action under Chapter 70.105D RCW.
(r)(p) Other than conversions to nonforest land use, forest practices regulated under
Chapter 76.09 RCW are not subject to additional regulations under the SMA or this SMP
(RCW 90.58.030(2)(d)(ii)).
(q) The external or internal retrofitting of an existing structure with the exclusive
purpose of compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec.
12101 et seq.) or to otherwise provide physical access to the structure by individuals with
disabilities.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.770.]
29.35.090 Duration of permits.
(1) The duration of permits shall be consistent with WAC 173-27-090 as follows:
(a) Construction activities shall be commenced or, where no construction activities are
involved, the use or activity shall be commenced within two years of the effective date of
a substantial development permit. The City may authorize a single extension for a period
not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors if a request for extension has been filed
before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record
on the substantial development permit and to the Department.
(b) Authorization to conduct development activities shall terminate five years after the
effective date of a substantial development permit. However, the City may authorize a
single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors if a request
for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension
is given to parties of record and to the Department. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970
§ 29.01.780.]
Page 176 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 155
29.35.100 Initiation of development.
(1) Each permit for a substantial development, shoreline special use, or shoreline variance
issued by local government shall contain a provision that construction pursuant to the permit shall
not begin and is not authorized until 21 days from the date of receipt filing with Ecology as defined
in RCW 90.58.140(6) and WAC 173-27-130, or until all review proceedings initiated within 21
days from the date of receipt filing of the decision. The date of filing for a substantial development
permit is the date of actual receipt by Ecology of a local government’s final decision on the permit.
With regard to a permit for a shoreline variance or a shoreline special use, date of filing means the
date a responsible local government or applicant receives the written decision of Ecology. When
a substantial development permit and a special use or variance permit are required for a
development, the submittal on the permits shall be made concurrently.
(2) Permits for substantial development, shoreline special use, or shoreline variance may be in
any form prescribed and used by the City, including a combined permit application form. Such
forms will be supplied by the City.
(3) A permit data sheet shall be submitted to Ecology with each shoreline permit. The permit
data sheet form shall be consistent with WAC 173-27-990.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.790.]
29.35.110 Review process.
(1) After the City’s approval of a shoreline special use or variance permit, the City shall submit
the permit to Ecology for approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Ecology shall render and
transmit to the City and the applicant its final decision approving, approving with conditions, or
disapproving the permit within 30 days of the date of submittal by the City pursuant to WAC 173-
27-110.
(2) Ecology shall review the complete file submitted by the City on shoreline special use or
variance permits and any other information submitted or available that is relevant to the
application. Ecology shall base its determination to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a
special use permit or variance permit on consistency with the policy and provisions of the SMA
and except as provided in WAC 173-27-210 and the criteria in WAC 173-27-160 and 173-27-170.
(3) The City shall provide timely notification of Ecology’s final decision to those interested
persons having requested notification from local government pursuant to WAC 173-27-130.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.800.]
29.35.120 Appeals.
(1) Appeals of Shoreline Permit Decisions. The City’s decisions on shoreline permits may be
appealed to the following bodies in this sequence:
Page 177 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 156
(a) Pasco City Council in accordance with PMC 25.200.110.
(b) State Shorelines Hearings Board (SHB) in Tumwater.
(c) SHB decisions may be appealed to superior court.
(d) Superior court decisions may be appealed to the Court of Appeals.
(e) Appeals Court decisions may be appealed to the Washington Supreme Court.
(f) Appeals to the SHB and courts are governed by RCW 90.58.180, RCW
43.21B.001, Chapter 34.05 RCW Part V, and Chapter 461-08 WAC.
(2) All requests for review of any final permit decisions under Chapter 90.58 RCW and
Chapter 173-27 WAC are governed by the procedures established in RCW 90.58.180, Chapter
461-08 WAC, and the rules of practice and procedure of the SHB.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.810.]
29.35.130 Amendments to permits.
(1) A permit revision is required whenever the applicant proposes substantive changes to the
design, terms, or conditions of a project from that which is approved in the permit. Changes are
substantive if they materially alter the project in a manner that relates to its conformance to the
terms and conditions of the permit, the SMP, and/or the policies and provisions of Chapter 90.58
RCW. Changes that are not substantive in effect do not require approval of a revision.
(2) Revisions to permits shall be considered consistent with WAC 173-27-100.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.820.]
29.35.140 Enforcement.
(1) The SMA provides for a cooperative program between the City and Ecology to implement
and enforce the provisions of the SMA and this SMP. This section provides for a variety of means
of enforcement, including civil and criminal penalties, orders to cease and desist, and orders to
take corrective action, in accordance with WAC 173-27-270, 173-27-280, 173-27-290, and 173-
27-300, and Chapter 25.10 PMC. The enforcement means and penalties provided herein are not
exclusive and may be taken or imposed in conjunction with, or in addition to, any other civil
enforcement actions and civil penalties, injunctive or declaratory relief, criminal prosecution,
actions to recover civil or criminal penalties, or any other action or sanction authorized by this
section, or any other provision of the PMC, or any other provision of state or federal law and
regulation.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator, with the assistance of the City Attorney, shall have authority
to commence and prosecute any enforcement action authorized by this section. In determining the
Page 178 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 157
appropriate enforcement actions to be commenced and prosecuted, the Shoreline Administrator
shall consider the following factors:
(a) The nature of the violation;
(b) The extent of damage or potential future risk to the shoreline environment and its
ecological functions or to the public health and safety, caused by or resulting from, whether
directly or indirectly, the alleged violation;
(c) The existence of knowledge, intent, or malice on behalf of the violator;
(d) The economic benefit or advantage that accrued to the violator(s) as a result of the
violation; and
(e) The estimated actions and costs of providing adequate mitigation, restoration,
rehabilitation, or enhancement to repair or minimize any substantial adverse impacts upon
the shoreline environment and its ecological functions or the public health and safety.
(3) The Shoreline Administrator may commence and prosecute enforcement action jointly
with Ecology. Pursuant to Chapter 173-27 WAC, Ecology may initiate and prosecute enforcement
action separate from the Shoreline Administrator.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.830.]
29.35.150 Cumulative effects of shoreline developments.
(1) The City will periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the SMP update for achieving no
net loss of shoreline ecological functions with respect to shoreline permitting and exemptions. At
the end of the first full year after adoption, and at the end of every other year thereafter, the
Shoreline Administrator shall prepare a report documenting shoreline substantial development
permits, special use permits, and variances, including the exempt use activity approvals and the
locations and effects of each by type and classifications. The report should include activities
involving development, conservation, restoration, mitigation, and enforcement. It should
summarize the net change of developments (including new development and decommissioning of
structures and protected areas) using indicators, such as linear length of stabilization and flood
hazard structures, number of overwater structures (e.g., piers and docks), road length within
shoreline, number of water body road crossings, number of levees/dikes, acres of impervious
surface areas, acres of vegetation, acres of permanently protected areas, or areas with limited
development. Compliance and enforcement activity will also be tracked.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator Official will, to the extent feasible, coordinate with other City
departments or adjacent jurisdictions to assess cumulative effects of shoreline development.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.840.]
Page 179 of 465
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 158
29.35.160 Amendments to shoreline master program.
(1) Amendments to the SMP shall be processed as legislative decisions pursuant to Chapters
24.88 and 25.210 PMC and WAC 173-26-110.
(2) Any locally approved amendments to the SMP will not become effective until approved
by Ecology.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.850.]
29.35.170 Shoreline environment designation maps or official shoreline map.
See attached Shoreline Designation Maps.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.860.]
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word
of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any
other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this Ordinance, including scrivener’s errors
or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or
numbering or referencing of Ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval,
passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2023.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Published: _____________________________
Page 180 of 465
Resolution – Shoreline Master Program (PLAN 2021-005) - 1
RESOLUTION NO. 4372
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2023 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) is the foundation for shoreline
management in Washington State; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the SMA is to manage the shoreline to accommodate all
reasonable and appropriate uses consistent with protecting against adverse effects to the public
health, the land and its vegetation and wildlife; and
WHEREAS, the SMA requires each town, city, and county to review, and, if necessary,
revise its Shoreline Master Program (SMP) every eight years per the Revised Code of Washington
(RCW) 90.58.80; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco’s (City) SMP is a planning document that outlines the City's
shoreline goals and establishes regulations for development to ensure that all land use,
development, or other activity occurring within the designated shoreline jurisdiction is appropriate
for that area; and
WHEREAS, the City is required to complete an update of the existing SMP that is
consistent with procedural and substantive requirements of the SMA governed by RCW 90.58 and
WAC 173-26; and
WHEREAS, the City last updated their SMP September 19, 2016 by Ordinance No. 4314;
and
WHEREAS, City entered into a grant contract with the Washington State Department of
Ecology effective May 10, 2022, to update and amend its SMP consistent with the Shoreline
Management Act and Shoreline Master Program Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City has completed the periodic review process to review and revise its
SMP in coordination with the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology); and
WHEREAS, the periodic review addressed recent changes in SMA requirements, changes
for consistency with revised comprehensive plans and regulations, and any other changes deemed
necessary to reflect changed circumstances, new information, or improved data; and
WHEREAS, the proposed changes were made available to public agencies, NPOs, tribes,
and the general public via direct email, City of Pasco web posts, Ecology website posting, and
public notice during a 60-day comment period held between February 24 and April 25, 2023; and
WHEREAS, comments have been indexed and addressed by staff and consultant as part
of the SMP Update process; and
Page 181 of 465
Resolution – Shoreline Master Program (PLAN 2021-005) - 2
WHEREAS, on March 22, 2023 a Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendments 30-day
comment period and Joint Public Hearing notice and SEPA Checklist were sent to the agencies for
review (March 26, 2023 to April 25, 2023); and
WHEREAS, on April 20, 2023, the Planning Commission held a Joint Public Hearing
with the Washington State Department of Ecology to accept public testimony on the proposed
SMP Update, and that meeting was duly recorded; and
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2023, the Planning Commission held a Public Meeting to
recommend the SMP report and ancillary documents be sent on to Ecology for preliminary review,
and that meeting was duly recorded; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend to the
City Council approval of the SMP Update; and
WHEREAS, the SMP Update provides a document that outlines the City's amended
shoreline goals and regulations for development now and in the future; and
WHEREAS, the SMP Update achieves the goals and requirements of the SMA (RCW
90.58); and
WHEREAS, the proposal was reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act and a
Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposed SMP Update on June 19, 2023;
and
WHEREAS, Ecology approved the City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Update
without comment on June XX 2023; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the Shoreline Master Program Update is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit A as a
Shoreline Planning guide and supplement to the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 182 of 465
Resolution – Shoreline Master Program (PLAN 2021-005) - 3
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this 2nd day of October,
2023.
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 183 of 465
CITY OF PASCO
DRAFT SHORELINE MASTER
PROGRAM UPDATE
Prepared for
City of Pasco
Prepared by
White Bluffs Consulting189205 East 36th
Avenue
Kennewick, Washington 99337
This report was funded through a grant from the Washington State Department of Ecology
Page 184 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting ii
DATE 2023
Page 185 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I: Shoreline Goals and Policies (RCW 90.58.100) ...................................................... 1
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1
2 Relationship Between Growth Management Act and Shoreline Management Act .. 1
3 Profile of the Shoreline Jurisdiction within the City of Pasco.................................... 2
3.1 Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers ..................................................................... 2
3.2 Shorelines of Statewide Significance ........................................................ 2
4 Development of Goals and Policies .............................................................................. 2
4.1 Economic Development Element ............................................................. 3
4.2 Public Access and Recreation Element .................................................... 4
4.3 Circulation Element ................................................................................... 6
4.4 Shoreline Uses and Modifications Element .............................................. 7
4.5 Conservation Element ............................................................................. 16
4.6 Historic, Cultural, Scientific, and Educational Resources Element ...... 18
4.7 Flood Hazard Management Element ...................................................... 19
4.8 Private Property Right ............................................................................ 20
SECTION II: Shoreline Regulations ........................................................................................... 21
Article I. Authority and Purpose .................................................................................... 21
29.01.010 Authority ............................................................................................ 21
29.01.020 Applicability ....................................................................................... 21
29.01.030 Purpose ............................................................................................... 22
29.01.040 Relationship to Other Codes, Ordinances, and Plans ...................... 23
29.01.050 Liberal Construction .......................................................................... 24
29.01.060 Severability......................................................................................... 24
29.01.070 Effective Date ..................................................................................... 24
29.01.080 Definitions .......................................................................................... 25
Article II. Environment Designation .............................................................................. 45
29.01.100 Environment Designations ................................................................ 45
29.01.110 Aquatic ............................................................................................... 46
29.01.120 Natural ................................................................................................ 47
29.01.130 Urban Conservancy ........................................................................... 49
29.01.140 Public Flood Protection ..................................................................... 50
29.01.150 Recreation .......................................................................................... 51
29.01.160 High Intensity – Industrial ................................................................ 53
29.01.170 High Intensity – Mixed Use .............................................................. 54
29.01.180 Shoreline Residential ......................................................................... 56
Page 186 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting ii
Article III. General Regulations ...................................................................................... 58
29.01.200 Shoreline Use and Modification ....................................................... 58
29.01.210 Development Standards ..................................................................... 62
29.01.220 Archaeological and Historic Resources ............................................ 63
29.01.230 Environmental Protection................................................................. 64
29.01.240 Shoreline Vegetation Conservation .................................................. 65
29.01.250 Water Quality, Stormwater, and Nonpoint Pollution ..................... 65
29.01.260 Public Access ...................................................................................... 66
29.01.270 Flood Hazard Reduction .................................................................... 71
Article IV. Shoreline Modifications and Use Regulations ............................................. 74
29.01.300 Agriculture ......................................................................................... 74
29.01.320 Boating Facilities ................................................................................ 75
29.01.330 Breakwater, Jetties, Groins, and Weirs............................................. 78
29.01.340 Commercial Development ................................................................ 79
29.01.350 Dredging and Dredge Material Disposal .......................................... 81
29.01.360 Fill and Excavation ............................................................................ 84
29.01.370 Industrial Development .................................................................... 86
29.01.380 In-stream Structures .......................................................................... 87
29.01.390 Mining ................................................................................................ 89
29.01.400 Piers and Docks .................................................................................. 90
29.01.410 Recreational Development ................................................................ 96
29.01.420 Residential Development .................................................................. 99
29.01.430 Shoreline Habitat and Natural Systems Enhancement Projects ... 100
29.01.440 Shoreline Stabilization..................................................................... 101
29.01.450 Transportation: Trails, Roads, and Parking .................................... 102
29.01.460 Utilities ............................................................................................. 104
Article V. Critical Areas ................................................................................................ 108
29.01.500 Critical Areas.................................................................................... 108
29.01.510 General Provisions ........................................................................... 110
29.01.520 Wetlands .......................................................................................... 119
29.01.530 Fish and Wildlife Habitat ................................................................ 131
29.01.540 Aquifer Recharge Areas ................................................................... 140
29.01.550 Flood Hazard Areas ......................................................................... 144
29.01.560 Geologic Hazard Areas .................................................................... 146
Article VI. Existing Uses, Structures, and Lots ............................................................ 155
29.01.600 Applicability ..................................................................................... 155
29.01.610 Nonconforming Uses ....................................................................... 155
29.01.620 Nonconforming Structures .............................................................. 156
29.01.630 Nonconforming Lots ........................................................................ 158
Page 187 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting iii
Article VII. Administration and Enforcements ........................................................... 159
29.01.700 Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................... 159
29.01.710 Interpretation ................................................................................... 160
29.01.720 Statutory Noticing Requirements ................................................... 160
29.01.730 Application Requirements .............................................................. 161
29.01.740 Shoreline Substantial Development Permits .................................. 161
29.01.750 Shoreline Special Use Permits ......................................................... 162
29.01.760 Shoreline Variance Permits ............................................................ 163
29.01.770 Exemptions from Shoreline Substantial Development Permits .... 164
29.01.780 Duration of Permits ......................................................................... 170
29.01.790 Initiation of Development ............................................................... 170
29.01.800 Review Process ................................................................................ 171
29.01.810 Appeals ............................................................................................. 171
29.01.820 Amendments to Permits .................................................................. 171
29.01.830 Enforcement ..................................................................................... 172
29.01.840 Cumulative Effects of Shoreline Developments ............................ 173
29.01.850 Amendments to Shoreline Master Program ................................... 173
29.01.860 Shoreline Environment Designation Maps or Official Shoreline Map
173
List of Tables
Table 1. Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers .......................................................................................... 2
Table 29.01.200 (2): Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix for City of Pasco ....................... 59
Table 29.01.210 (2): Shoreline Development Standards Matrix for City of Pasco ................... 63
Table 29.01.520 (8)(a): Wetland Buffer Width Requirements ................................................ 121
Table 29.01.520 (8)(b): Land Use Intensity Table .................................................................... 124
Table 29.01.520 (13): Wetland Mitigation Ratios (for Eastern Washington) ......................... 131
Table 29.01.530 (3): Classification by Fish and Wildlife Areas ............................................... 132
Table 29.01.540 (2)(a): Designation of Aquifer Recharge Areas ............................................. 141
Table 29.01.560 (3)(a): Criteria for Classification of Geologic Hazard Areas ......................... 147
Table 29.01.560 (4): Rating of Geologic Hazard Risk .............................................................. 148
Page 188 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting iv
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
BMP best management practice
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
City City of Pasco
County Franklin County
CPTED Crime Prevention through Environmental Design
CWA Clean Water Act
Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map
GMA Growth Management Act
Guidelines SMA Guidelines (Chapter 173-26 WAC)
HPA hydraulic project approval
JARPA Joint Aquatic Resource Permits Application
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NRCS U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation
Service
OHWM ordinary high water mark
PMC Pasco Municipal Code
RCW Revised Code of Washington
SEPA State Environmental Policy Act
SHB Shorelines Hearings Board
SMA Washington State Shoreline Management Act
SMP Shoreline Master Program
SR subreach
SSWS shorelines of statewide significance
UGA urban growth area
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Page 189 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting v
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
WA DOH Washington State Department of Health
WAC Washington Administrative Code
WDFW Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife
WDNR Washington State Department of Natural Resources
Page 190 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 1
SECTION I: Shoreline Goals and Policies (RCW 90.58.100)
1 Introduction
The City of Pasco, through an updated Shoreline Master Program (SMP), intends to implement
the requirements of the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA) Revised Code of
Washington (RCW 90.58), the state SMA Guidelines (Chapter 173-26 Washington
Administrative Code [WAC]) (Guidelines), and the Shoreline Management Permit and
Enforcement Procedures (WAC 173-27).
The SMA was enacted in 1971 to provide for the management and protection of shorelines of the
state by regulating development in the shoreline area. The goal of the SMA is, “to prevent the
inherent harm in an uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the state's shorelines” (RCW
90.58.020). The SMA requires cities and counties to adopt an SMP to regulate shoreline
development and accommodate “all reasonable and appropriate uses” consistent with “protection
against adverse effects to the public health, the land and its vegetation and wildlife, and the
waters of the state and their aquatic life…and public rights of navigation.” The City of Pasco did
not have its own SMP prior tothe 2015 comprehensive update. The City had adopted by
reference and implemented Franklin County’s SMP, which had been approved in 1974. The
SMP has again been updated in 2022 and 2023 as part of a periodic review and update.
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) approved the updated SMA Guidelines in
2003. The SMA and implementing SMP Guidelines require all towns, cities, and counties across
the state to comprehensively update their SMPs. The guidelines provide new requirements for
environmental protections, including meeting no net loss of ecological functions, providing
public access, accounting for advancements in science and shoreline management practices, and
establishing a clear relationship between the SMA and the Growth Management Act (GMA).
The updated version of the SMP for the City of Pasco provides goals, policies, and regulations
for the development of Pasco shorelines consistent with the SMA and guidelines.
2 Relationship Between Growth Management Act and Shoreline
Management Act
A SMP contains goals, policies, regulations, and environment designation maps that guide
shoreline development in accordance with state requirements. Pasco's SMP is integrated with the
City's land use regulation system. Consistent with RCW 36.70A.480, the goals and policies
contained in this SMP shall be considered an element of the City's Comprehensive Growth
Management Plan (Comprehensive Plan) required by the GMA. All other portions of this SMP,
including the use regulations, are considered a part of the City's development regulations
required by the GMA.
The Inventory, Analysis, and Characterization Report; Restoration Plan; Cumulative Impacts
Analysis Report (which includes the “no net loss of shoreline ecological functions” analysis
findings); and Public Participation Plan are supporting documents and are not adopted as part of
this SMP or the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Page 191 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 2
The Inventory, Analysis, and Characterization Report establishes the baseline against which the
standard “no net loss of shoreline ecological functions” is measured. The Restoration Plan
identifies and prioritizes shoreline restoration opportunities that may be undertaken
independently or in conjunction with mitigation for development impacts to improve shoreline
ecological functions over time.
3 Profile of the Shoreline Jurisdiction within the City of Pasco
The Washington State SMA defines the Shoreline of the State as, “all ‘shorelines’ and
‘shorelines of statewide (SSWS)’ within the state” (RCW 90.58.030). The shoreline includes
floodways, land within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the waterways,
floodplains up to 200 feet from the floodway edge, and associated wetlands.
3.1 Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers
Pasco’s SMP encompasses shoreline along the Columbia River and Snake River. The City’s
shoreline waterbodies are listed in Table 1. Both the Columbia River and Snake River are
considered SSWS. See Section 3.2 for discussion on SSWS.
Table 1. Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers
Stream Name
Shoreline of Statewide
Significance
Total Length
Proposed Shoreline
Columbia River Yes 14.4 miles
Snake River Yes 2.8 miles
3.2 Shorelines of Statewide Significance
The entire shoreline jurisdiction in the City that includes the Columbia and Snake rivers are
considered SSWS, as listed in Table 1. The SMA designates certain shoreline areas as SSWS,
which are defined as “natural rivers or segments thereof” that have a mean annual flow of
200 cubic feet per second or more (or for streams east of the crest of the Cascades [RCW
90.58.030], the portion downstream from the first 300 square miles of drainage area) and lakes,
whether natural, artificial, or a combination thereof, of 1,000 acres or greater in surface area. The
Columbia and Snake rivers are SSWS based on the flow and upstream drainage criteria.
The SSWS protection and management goals are described in the Development of Goals and
Policies – Shoreline Uses and Modifications Element section.
4 Development of Goals and Policies
Goals express broad value statements that reflect the City’s vision of its shorelines. Goals also
provide a framework upon which the more detailed SMP shoreline use environments, policies,
regulations, and administrative procedures are based in subsequent chapters. Policies are more
detailed statements reflecting the City’s goals and visions for its shorelines. Policies provide
detail to the associated goals and act as a bridge between the goals and implementing regulations.
Page 192 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 3
The SMP goals and policies are categorized according to the SMP elements mandated in the
SMA. The general goal and policy statements found within each SMP element provide the policy
basis for the City’s SMP administration.
4.1 Economic Development Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Support water-oriented uses to maximize the positive economic
impact of tourism and recreational development.
(b) Goal B: Promote economic growth that conserves natural resources and
open spaces and maintains the environmental quality.
(c) Goal C: Maintain existing development and secure additional commercial
and industrial facilities and infrastructure necessary for existing and future
development in shoreline areas where it is most feasible, while
maintaining environmental quality.
(d) Goal D: Recognize the role of the rivers as a transportation corridor that
facilitates trade and economic growth. Protect and expand the assets
necessary in the rivers and on the shoreline to utilize that transportation
corridor to promote economic development.
(2) Policies:
(a) Ensure healthy, orderly economic growth by providing for those economic
activities that will be an asset to the local economy and for which the
adverse effects on the quality of the shoreline and surrounding
environment can be mitigated. Ensure any economic activity taking place
along the shoreline operates without causing irreparable harm to the site’s
environment or adjacent shoreline areas.
(b) Maintain and protect existing water-dependent and water-related
industries that support the City’s economy. Provide opportunities for
future expansions of such industries.
(c) Allow diversion of water for agricultural, commercial, and industrial
purposes consistent with the State’s water rights laws.
(d) Dredging of the rivers and shoreline transportation assets is a necessary
component of maintaining the capabilities of the rivers to serve as a
transportation corridor for inputs and outputs of industries within Pasco
and surrounding areas.
(e) Promote tourism and develop and maintain, as an economic asset, the
recreation and tourism industry along shorelines in a manner that will
enhance public enjoyment.
Page 193 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 4
(f) Work with the Port of Pasco, Franklin County, and other agencies to
ensure sustainable economic growth along the shoreline. Encourage
cooperative use of existing port facilities, including docks and piers, where
feasible and when they do not negatively affect the public safety.
(g) Give preference to economic activities in undeveloped areas, which either
leave natural or existing shoreline features such as trees, shrubs, grasses,
and wildlife habitat, unmodified, or modify them in a way that enhances
human awareness and appreciation of the shoreline and other natural and
non-natural surroundings.
(h) Encourage new water-dependent, water-related, and water-enjoyment
economic development in priority order.
(i) Where possible, encourage development that incorporates low-impact
development techniques into new projects and integrates architectural and
landscape elements that recognize the river environment.
(j) Require non-water-oriented commercial or recreational development to
provide for ecological restoration and public access as appropriate.
(k) Ensure new industrial and commercial uses will not result in a net loss of
shoreline ecological functions or have significant adverse impacts on
navigation, recreation, and public access.
4.2 Public Access and Recreation Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Promote, protect, and enhance physical and visual public access
along the shoreline of the Columbia and Snake rivers. Increase the amount
and diversity of public access along the shoreline consistent with private
property rights, public safety, and the natural shoreline character.
(b) Goal B: Maintain and enhance the existing public access system according
to the City’s Public Access Plan (Rivershore Linkage and Amenity Plan
approved by the City in 2012), building upon the City’s many types of
shoreline public access with new public access opportunities where
appropriate.
(c) Goal C: Provide physical and visual public access as feasible and when
new development creates demand for public access.
(d) Goal D: Ensure diverse, convenient, and adequate water-oriented
recreational opportunities along the shoreline for the public.
(e) Goal F: Give water-oriented shoreline recreational development priority
within shoreline jurisdiction.
Page 194 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 5
(2) Policies:
(a) Protect and enhance visual and physical access to shoreline, especially on
public properties. Provide visual access, such as viewpoints or view
corridors, in areas with limited physical access due to a steep slope or the
sensitive nature of the shoreline whenever possible.
(b) Ensure new developments, uses, and activities on or near the shoreline do
not impair or detract from the public’s access to the water. Where
practicable, public access to the shoreline should be enhanced.
(c) Design public access that minimizes potential impacts to private property
and individual privacy.
(d) Locate, design, manage, and maintain public access and recreation
facilities in a manner that protects shoreline ecological functions and
processes and the public’s health and safety.
(e) Identify opportunities for public access on publicly owned shorelines and
according to the City’s Public Access Plan. Encourage federal, state, and
local governments to provide public access and recreational uses on
existing shoreline properties according to their management policies such
as existing state parks, trails and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
lands along the Columbia River.
(f) Preserve, maintain, and enhance public access afforded by shoreline street
ends, public utilities, and rights-of-way.
(g) Provide physical and visual public access in the shoreline jurisdiction in
association with the following uses when feasible: residential
developments with five or more dwellings; commercial development; and
public agency recreational development.
(h) Provide public access and interpretive displays as part of publicly funded
restoration projects where significant ecological impacts are addressed.
(i) Allow for passive and active shoreline recreation that emphasizes location
along shorelines in association with the state, county and other public
agency parks, recreation, wildlife habitat, and open-space plans.
(j) Encourage a variety of compatible recreational experiences and activities
to satisfy the City’s diverse recreational needs such as parks, boat lunches,
docks, trails, and viewing platforms.
(k) Give water-dependent recreation priority water-enjoyment recreation uses.
Give water-enjoyment recreational uses priority over non-water-oriented
recreational uses.
Page 195 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 6
(l) Integrate and link water-oriented recreational facilities with other
amenities along the shoreline, such as walking trails, bicycle paths,
easements, and scenic drives when feasible. For example, encourage
connection between the Sacajawea Heritage Trail and the Columbia
Plateau Trail in Franklin County.
(m) Promote non-intensive recreational uses that avoid adverse effects to the
natural environment, do not contribute to flood hazards, and avoid damage
to the shoreline environment through modifications such as structural
shoreline stabilization or native vegetation removal.
4.3 Circulation Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Develop safe, convenient, and diversified circulation systems to
ensure efficient movement of people, goods, and services, with minimal
adverse impacts on the shoreline environment.
(2) Policies:
(a) Provide safe, reasonable, and adequate circulation systems to shorelines
where routes will minimize adverse effects on unique or fragile shoreline
features and existing ecological systems, while contributing to the
functional and visual enhancement of the shoreline.
(b) Within the shoreline jurisdiction, locate land circulation systems that are
not shoreline-oriented and as far from the land-water interface as
practicable to reduce interference with either natural shoreline resources or
other appropriate shoreline uses.
(c) Allow for maintenance and improvements to existing roads and parking
areas. Allow for necessary new roads and parking areas when other
locations outside of shoreline jurisdiction are not feasible.
(d) Plan and develop a circulation network, which is compatible with the
shoreline environment and respects and protects ecological and aesthetic
values in the shoreline of the state, as well as private property rights.
(e) In the circulation network, plan for pedestrian, bicycle, and public
transportation where appropriate. Circulation planning and projects should
support existing and proposed shoreline uses that are consistent with the
SMP.
(f) Promote existing transportation corridors for reuse for water-dependent
uses or public access when they are abandoned.
Page 196 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 7
(g) Encourage relocation or improvement of those circulation elements that
are functionally or aesthetically disruptive to the shoreline, public
waterfront access, and ecological functions.
(h) Plan parking areas to achieve optimum use. Where possible, parking
should serve more than one use (e.g., serving recreational use on
weekends and commercial use on weekdays).
(i) Encourage low-impact parking facilities such as those with gravels or
permeable pavements and bio-swales.
(j) Encourage trails and bicycle paths along shorelines in a manner
compatible with the natural character, resources, and ecology of the
shoreline.
(k) Encourage the linkage of shoreline parks, recreation areas, and public
access points with linear systems, such as hiking and bicycle paths,
easements, and scenic drives.
4.4 Shoreline Uses and Modifications Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Encourage shoreline development and uses that recognize the
City’s natural and cultural values and its unique aesthetic qualities offered
by its variety of shoreline environments, including, but not limited to,
reservoir-bounded river segments, flood protection levees, recreational
and industrial developments, riverine wetlands, open views, and plentiful
formal and informal public access.
(b) Goal B: The City recognizes and protects the functions and values of the
shoreline environments of statewide and local significance. For SSWS,
protection and management priorities are to:
(i) Recognize and protect statewide interest over local interest;
(ii) Preserve the natural character of the shoreline;
(iii) Provide long-term over short-term benefits;
(iv) Protect the resources and ecology of shoreline;
(v) Increase public access to publicly owned areas of shoreline;
(vi) Increase recreational opportunities for the public in shoreline areas;
and
Page 197 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 8
(vii) Recognize the statewide interest in keeping the Columbia and
Snake rivers adequately dredged and maintained to facilitate trade.
(2) General Policies:
(a) Maintain areas within the shoreline jurisdiction with unique attributes for
specific long-term uses, including commercial, industrial, residential,
recreational, and openspace uses.
(b) Ensure proposed shoreline uses are distributed, located, and developed in a
manner that will maintain or improve the health, safety, and welfare of the
public when such uses occupy shoreline areas.
(c) Ensure activities and facilities are located on the shoreline in such a
manner as to retain or improve the quality of the environment.
(d) Ensure proposed shoreline uses do not infringe upon the rights of others,
upon the rights of private ownership, upon the rights of the public under
the Public Trust Doctrine of federal navigational servitude, and treaty
rights of Native American tribes.
(e) Minimize the adverse impacts of shoreline uses and activities on the
environment during all phases of development (e.g., design, construction,
management, and use).
(3) Shoreline Environment Designation Policies:
(a) Provide a comprehensive shoreline environment designation system to
categorize the City’s shoreline into environments based on the primary
characteristics of shoreline areas to guide the use and management of
these areas and to preserve wildlife habitat area, natural resources, and
public agency operations.
(b) Designate properties as Natural in order to protect and restore those
shoreline areas that are relatively free of human influence or that include
intact or minimally degraded shoreline functions that are sensitive to
potential impacts from human use.
(c) Designate properties Urban Conservancy to protect and restore ecological
functions of open space, floodplain, and other sensitive lands, while
accommodating low-intensity uses.
(d) Assign appropriate designations to accommodate recreational uses. Ensure
intense recreational uses, such as boat launches and parks, do not conflict
with the sensitive nature of the shoreline (e.g., habitat management units)
where low impact recreational uses are more appropriate.
Page 198 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 9
(e) Assign appropriate designation for flood protection areas maintained by
public agencies, while allowing low-intensity recreational uses such as
trail and viewpoints.
(f) Assign properties as High Intensity – Industrial to support industrial,
commercial, irrigation supply, transportation, and navigation activities
while maintaining the ecological functions.
(g) Assign properties as High Intensity – Mixed Use to support commercial,
residential, transportation, and navigation activities while maintaining the
ecological functions.
(h) Designate properties as Shoreline Residential to accommodate higher
density residential development and recognize existing and proposed land
uses. This designation is appropriate for residential uses on lands with
zoning classifications for detached and attached residences.
(4) Agriculture Policies:
(a) This SMP recognizes the importance of agriculture to the City’s economy
and also as it exists in the City limits and urban growth areas (UGAs).
Allow for ongoing agricultural activities, while also maintaining shoreline
ecological functions and processes.
(b) Conduct new agricultural development in a manner that ensures no net
loss of shoreline ecological functions and processes.
(c) Maintain a vegetative buffer between agricultural lands and waterbodies
or wetlands.
(d) Conversion of agricultural lands to other uses should comply with all
policies and regulations for non-agricultural uses.
(5) Boating Facilities Policies:
(a) Locate and design boating facilities so their structures and operations will
be compatible with the area affected such as environmental conditions,
shoreline configuration, access, and neighboring upland and aquatic uses.
(b) Require restoration activities when substantial improvements or repairs to
existing boating facilities are planned.
(c) Boating facilities that minimize the amount of shoreline modification are
preferred.
(d) Boating facilities should provide physical and visual public shoreline
access and provide for multiple uses, including water-related use, to the
Page 199 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 10
extent compatible with shoreline ecological functions and processes and
adjacent shoreline use.
(e) Boating facilities should be located and designed to avoid adverse effects
on riverine and nearshore processes, such as erosion, littoral or riparian
transport, accretion, and where feasible, enhance degraded, scarce, and/or
valuable shore features including accretion shoreforms.
(f) Location and design of boating facilities should not unduly obstruct
navigable waters and should avoid adverse effects to recreational
opportunities such as fishing, pleasure boating, swimming, beach walking,
picnicking, and shoreline viewing.
(6) Breakwaters, Jetties, Groins, and Weirs Policies:
(a) To the extent feasible, limit the use of breakwaters, jetties, groins, weirs,
or other similar structures to those projects providing ecological
restoration or other public benefits. These structures should avoid or
minimize significant ecological impacts. Impacts that cannot be avoided
should be mitigated.
(7) Dredging and Dredge Material Disposal Policies:
(a) Dredging and dredge material disposal should avoid and minimize
significant ecological impacts. Impacts that cannot be avoided should be
mitigated.
(b) Design and locate new shoreline development to minimize the need for
dredging.
(c) Limit dredging and dredge material disposal to the minimum necessary to
allow for shoreline restoration, flood hazard reduction, and maintenance of
existing legal moorage and navigation, and to support existing industrial
areas. Except for industrial development, dredging to provide for new
navigation uses is discouraged.
(d) Dredging to support industrial development and to maintain existing
transportation corridors is a necessary and critical component of shoreline
management.
(e) Ensure dredging operations are planned and conducted in a manner that
will minimize interference with navigation and lessen adverse impacts to
other shoreline uses.
(8) Fill Policies:
(a) Limit fill waterward of the OHWM to support ecological restoration or to
facilitate water-dependent or public access uses.
Page 200 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 11
(b) Allow fill consistent with floodplain regulations upland of the OHWM,
provided it is located, designed, and constructed to protect shoreline
ecological functions and ecosystem-wide processes, including channel
migration, and is the minimum necessary to implement an approved
project.
(9) In -stream Structures Policies:
(a) Locate, plan, and permit in-stream structures only when consistent with
the full range of public interests, ecological functions and processes, and
environmental concerns, with special emphasis on protecting and restoring
priority habitats and species.
(10) Mining Policies:
(a) Locate mining facilities outside shoreline jurisdiction whenever feasible.
(b) Do not allow mining in any location waterward of the OHWM.
(c) Design and locate mining facilities and associated activities to prevent loss
of ecological function. Give preference to mining uses that result in the
creation, restoration, or enhancement of habitat for priority species.
(d) Protect waterbodies from sources of pollution, including, but not limited
to, sedimentation and siltation, chemical and petrochemical use, and
spillage and storage/disposal of mining wastes and spoils.
(e) Mining operations should be located, designed, and managed so that other
appropriate uses are not subjected to substantial or unnecessary adverse
impacts from noise, dust, or other effects of the operation. The operator
may be required to implement measures, such as buffers, limited hours, or
other mitigating measures, for the purpose of minimizing adverse
proximity impacts.
(11) Pier and Dock Policies:
(a) Pier and dock provisions should be consistent with the USACE McNary
Pool Management Plan.
(b) Moorage associated with a single-family residence is considered a
water-dependent use provided that it is designed and used as a facility to
access watercraft, and other moorage facilities are not available or
feasible. Moorage for water-related and water-enjoyment uses or shared
moorage for multi-family use should be allowed as part of a mixed-use
development or where it provides public access.
(c) New moorage, excluding docks accessory to single-family residences,
should be permitted when the applicant/proponent has demonstrated that a
Page 201 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 12
specific need exists to support the intended water-dependent or public
access use.
(d) As an alternative to continued proliferation of individual private moorage,
mooring buoys are preferred over docks or floats. Shared moorage
facilities are preferred over single-user moorage where feasible, especially
where water-use conflicts exist or are predictable. New subdivisions of
more than two lots and new multi-family development of more than two
dwelling units should provide shared moorage where feasible.
(e) Docks, piers, and mooring buoys, including those accessory to
single-family residences, should avoid locations where they will adversely
impact shoreline ecological functions or processes, including high-velocity
currents and littoral drift.
(f) Moorage should be spaced and oriented in a manner that minimizes
hazards and obstructions to public navigation rights and corollary rights
thereto, such as, but not limited to, fishing, swimming, and pleasure
boating, and private riparian rights of adjacent landowners.
(g) Moorage should be restricted to the minimum size necessary to meet the
needs of the proposed use. The length, width, and height of piers and
docks should be no greater than that required for safety and practicality for
the primary use.
(h) Pile supports are preferred over fills because piles do not displace water
surface or aquatic habitat and are removable and thus are more flexible in
terms of long-term use patterns. Floats may be less desirable than pile
structures where aquatic habitat or littoral drift are significant.
(i) The use of buoys for small craft moorage is preferred over pile or float
structures because of less long-term impact on shore features and users;
moorage buoys should be placed as close to shore as possible to minimize
obstruction to navigation.
(j) Piers and docks should be constructed of materials that will not adversely
affect water quality or aquatic plants and animals in the long term.
(k) New pier and dock development should be designed so as not to interfere
with lawful public access to or use of shorelines. Developers of new piers
and shared moorage should be encouraged to provide physical or visual
public access to shorelines whenever safe and compatible with the primary
use and shore features.
(12) Recreational Development Policies:
(a) Shoreline recreational development should be given priority for shoreline
location to the extent that the use facilitates the public’s ability to reach,
Page 202 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 13
touch, and enjoy the water's edge, to travel on the waters of the state, and
to view the water and the shoreline. Where appropriate, such facilities
should be dispersed along the shoreline in a manner that supports more
frequent recreational access and aesthetic enjoyment of the shoreline for a
substantial number of people.
(b) Recreational developments should facilitate appropriate use of shoreline
resources while conserving them. These resources include, but are not
limited to, cultural resources, accretion shoreforms, wetlands, soils,
groundwater, surface water, native plant and animal life, and shore
processes.
(c) Recreational facilities should be a combination of active and passive
types. Location of such facilities should consider the ecological function
and sensitive nature of the shoreline in order to avoid adverse impacts. For
example, wildlife and habitat preservation areas with sensitive shoreline
habitat should have low-impact recreational uses.
(d) Recreational developments and plans should provide the regional
population with a varied and balanced choice of recreation experiences in
appropriate locations. Public agencies should coordinate their plans and
activities to provide a wide variety of recreational opportunities without
needlessly duplicating facilities.
(e) Recreational development should encourage the linkage of shoreline
parks, recreation areas, and public access points with linear systems such
as hiking paths, bicycle paths, easements, and scenic drives.
(f) When feasible, recreation facilities should incorporate public education
regarding shoreline ecological functions and processes, the role of human
actions on the environment, and the importance of public involvement in
shoreline management. Opportunities incorporating educational and
interpretive information should be pursued in design and operation of
recreation facilities and nature trails.
(g) Recreational development should be located and designed to preserve,
enhance, or create scenic views and vistas.
(13) Residential Development Policies:
(a) Consider single-family residential development as a priority use.
(b) Locate and construct residential development in a manner that ensures no
net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
(c) Ensure the overall density of development, lot coverage, and height of
structures is appropriate to the physical capabilities of the site and
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 203 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 14
(d) Ensure new residential development provides adequate buffers or
open space from the water to protect ecological functions and
ecosystem-wide processes, preserve views, preserve shoreline aesthetic
characteristics, protect the privacy of nearby residences, and minimize use
conflicts.
(e) Make adequate provisions for services and infrastructure necessary to
support residential development.
(f) Design and locate residential development to preserve existing shoreline
vegetation, control erosion, and protect water quality.
(g) Design and locate new residences so shoreline stabilization will not be
necessary to protect the structure. The creation of new residential lots
should demonstrate the lots can be developed without:
(i) Constructing shoreline stabilization structures (such as bulkheads);
(ii) Causing significant erosion or slope instability;
(iii) Removing existing native vegetation within shoreline buffers;and
(iv) Disturbing cultural resources.
(14) Shoreline Habitat and Natural Systems Enhancement Projects Policies:
(a) Include provisions for shoreline vegetation restoration or enhancement,
fish and wildlife habitat enhancement, and low-impact development
techniques in projects located within shoreline jurisdiction, where feasible.
(b) Encourage and facilitate implementation of projects and programs
included in the SMP Shoreline Restoration Plan.
(15) Shoreline Stabilization Policies:
(a) Locate and design new development, including subdivisions, to eliminate
the need for new shoreline modification or stabilization.
(b) Design, locate, size, and construct new or replacement structural shoreline
stabilization measures to minimize and mitigate the impact of these
modifications on the City’s shorelines.
(c) Give preference to non-structural shoreline stabilization measures over
structural shoreline stabilization and give preference to soft structural
shoreline stabilization over hard structural shoreline stabilization.
(d) Allow location, design, and construction of riprap and other bank
stabilization measures primarily to prevent damage to existing
Page 204 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 15
development or to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the City’s
residents.
(e) Encourage fish-friendly shoreline design during new construction and
redevelopment by offering incentives and regulatory flexibility.
(16) Utilities Policies:
(a) Allow for utility maintenance and extension with criteria for location and
vegetation restoration as appropriate.
(b) Plan, design, and locate utility facilities to minimize harm to shoreline
functions, preserve the natural landscape, and minimize conflicts with
present and future planned land and shoreline uses, while meeting the
needs of future populations in areas planned to accommodate growth.
(c) Do not permit new non-water-oriented primary utility production and
processing facilities or parts of those facilities, such as power plants,
solid waste storage, or disposal facilities, within shoreline jurisdiction
unless no other options are feasible. Primary utility facilities, such as
wastewater treatment plants, and expansion of existing facilities should be
located in shoreline jurisdiction only if no practical upland alternative or
location exists. Such facilities and expansions should be designed and
located to minimize impacts on shoreline ecological functions, including
riparian and aquatic areas, and to the natural landscape and aesthetics.
Public health and safety should be the highest priority for the planning,
development, and operation of primary utility facilities.
(d) Locate utility transmission facilities for the conveyance of services, such
as power lines, cables, and pipelines, outside of shoreline jurisdiction
where feasible. Where permitted within shoreline jurisdiction, such
facilities should be located within existing or approved road crossings,
rights-of-way, and corridors or in such a way as to minimize potential
adverse impacts on shoreline areas. Joint use of rights-of-way and
corridors in shoreline areas should be encouraged.
(e) Locate new utility facilities so as not to require extensive shoreline
protection works.
(f) Locate utility facilities and corridors to protect scenic views from public
parks and trails. Whenever possible, such facilities should be placed
underground or alongside or under bridges.
(g) Design utility facilities and rights-of-way to preserve the natural landscape
and to minimize conflicts with present and planned land uses.
(17) Existing Uses Policies:
Page 205 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 16
(a) Allow nonconforming, existing legal uses and structures to continue in
accordance with this SMP. Residential structures and appurtenant
structures that were legally established and are used for a conforming use
(but do not meet standards for setbacks, buffers, or yards), area, bulk,
height, or density, should be considered a conforming structure.
(b) Allow alterations of nonconforming structures, uses, and lots in
consideration of historic development patterns when occupied by preferred
uses and consistent with public safety and other public purposes.
(c) Encourage transitions from nonconforming uses to conforming uses.
(d) Allow for nonconforming structures to expand when they do not increase
the nonconformity according to SMP requirements.
(e) Allow for existing roads, driveways, and utility lines to continue and
expand when they do not increase the nonconformity according to SMP
requirements.
(f) Consider the no net loss of ecological function objective to guide review
of proposed expansions or other changes to nonconforming uses and new
development on nonconforming vacant lots. This objective may be
addressed in an area-wide manner consistent with the SMP cumulative
impacts analysis.
4.5 Conservation Element
(Goals and policies for Environmental Protection, Critical Areas, and Shoreline Vegetation
Conservation, and Water Quality, Stormwater Management, and Nonpoint Pollution)
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Protect the existing hydraulic, hydrologic, and habitat functions,
as well as scenic and recreational values, of City’s shorelines and the
McNary Pool.
(2) General Policies:
(a) Develop and implement management practices that will ensure a sustained
yield of renewable resources of the shorelines while preserving,
protecting, enhancing, and restoring unique and non-renewable shoreline
resources, environments, or features.
(b) To the greatest extent feasible, reclaim and restore areas that are
biologically and aesthetically degraded while maintaining appropriate use
of the shoreline.
Page 206 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 17
(c) Preserve scenic vistas, aesthetics, fisheries and wildlife habitat, and other
critical areas.
(d) Protect shoreline processes and ecological functions through regulatory
and non-regulatory means that may include acquisition of key properties,
conservation easements, regulation of development within shoreline
jurisdiction, and incentives to private property owners to encourage
ecologically sound design and implementation of best land management
practices.
(e) Protect and manage shoreline-associated wetlands, including maintenance
of sufficient volumes of surface and subsurface drainage into wetlands, to
sustain existing vegetation and wildlife habitat.
(f) Work with other jurisdictional agencies in the region and with the private
sector to deal effectively with regional and watershed-wide natural
environment issues and the protection, preservation, and enhancement of
all shoreline areas as fish and wildlife habitat.
(g) Manage development to avoid risk and damage to property and loss of life
from geological conditions.
(h) Regulate development within the SMP area of the 100-year floodplain to
avoid risk and damage to property and loss of life.
(i) Prohibit the introduction of invasive plant species along shorelines and
encourage the removal of noxious and invasive weeds and trees.
(j) Protect, enhance, and maintain healthy vegetation consistent with the local
climate and nature of shoreline.
(3) Critical Areas:
(a) Goals:
(i) Goal A: Promote public health and welfare by instituting local
measures to preserve naturally occurring wetlands, critical aquifer
recharge areas, geologically hazardous areas, frequently flooded
areas (also see SMP Section I – 4.7: Flood Hazard Management
goals and policies), and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas
that exist in the City’s shoreline jurisdiction for their associated
value.
(ii) Goal B: Reduce the threat posed to the health and safety of citizens
from commercial, residential, or industrial development that may
be sited in areas of significant geologic hazard.
Page 207 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 18
(iii) Goal C: Identify categories of fish and wildlife habitat
conservation areas in the City’s shoreline jurisdiction, based in part
on information supplied by Washington State Department of Fish
and Wildlife’s (WDFW’s) Priority Habitat and Species Program
and other sources.
(iv) Goal D: Protect local wildlife values and reflect the needs and
desires of the public.
(b) Policies:
(i) Recognize that critical areas may serve a variety of vital functions,
including, but not limited to, flood storage and conveyance, water
quality protection, recharge and discharge areas for groundwater,
erosion control, sediment control, fish and wildlife habitat,
recreation, education, and scientific research.
(ii) Implement protection measures that strive to spare identified value
and function of critical areas that may be in jeopardy from new
development proposals. However, these regulations shall not
prohibit uses legally existing on any parcel prior to their adoption.
(iii) Avoid unnecessary duplication with various legal means and levels
of government that already address protection of wetlands, and
promote cooperation and coordination whenever possible.
(iv) Recognize that risks from geologic hazards can be reduced or
mitigated to acceptable levels through engineering design or
modified construction practices. In other cases where technological
efforts are not sufficient to reduce associated risks, building is best
avoided. Cooperate with federal, state, and private agencies and
individuals who have primary authority to manage specific fish
and wildlife habitat conservation areas within certain parts of the
City.
(v) Encourage preservation of adequate size blocks of land necessary
for species survival and corridor areas that allow for migratory
travel.
(vi) Recognize that species of wildlife in the City’s locality are in a
state of continuing flux, and a prudent understanding of this
phenomenon is vital in guiding decision makers to balance
conservation of wildlife species with promotion of wise, desirable
growth.
4.6 Historic, Cultural, Scientific, and Educational Resources Element
(1) Goals:
Page 208 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 19
(a) Goal A: Identify, preserve, and protect historical, cultural, and
archaeological resources found to be significant by recognized local, state,
or federal processes in compliance with State and Federal laws.
(b) Goal B: Encourage educational and scientific projects and programs that
foster a greater appreciation for the importance of shoreline management,
water-oriented activities, environmental conservation, and local historic
connections with the City’s shoreline.
(2) Policies:
(a) Identify, protect, preserve, and restore important archeological, historic,
and cultural sites located in shoreline areas.
(b) Encourage educational projects and programs that foster a greater
appreciation of the importance of shoreline management, maritime
activities, environmental conservation, and maritime history, consistent
with protecting no net loss of ecological functions.
(c) Prevent public or private uses and activities from damaging, altering,
removing, or destroying any site having historic, cultural, scientific, or
educational value without appropriate analysis and mitigation.
4.7 Flood Hazard Management Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Protect public safety within river floodways and floodplains while
recognizing that water levels in Columbia and Snake rivers are generally
stable as part of the McNary Pool. Protect natural systems by preserving
the flood storage function of floodplains.
(b) Goal B: Diminish potential hazards that may be caused by inappropriate
development in areas where severe and costly flooding is anticipated to
occur.
(2) Policies:
(a) Manage development proposed within floodplains and floodways
consistent with the SMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) standards, and Critical Area Regulations for frequently flooded
areas contained within this SMP.
(b) Implement protection measures designed to minimize hazards in
frequently flooded areas that already exist as detailed in
Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) 24.20, Provisions for Flood Hazard
Protection.
Page 209 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 20
(c) Work with Franklin County and state and federal agencies to deal
effectively with regional flooding issues.
(d) Control stormwater runoff in a manner consistent with low-impact
development practices, which utilize natural detention, retention, and
recharge techniques.
(e) Prohibit any development within the floodplain that would individually or
cumulatively cause any increase in the base flood elevation beyond FEMA
standards.
4.8 Private Property Right
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Recognize and protect private property rights in shoreline uses
and developments consistent with the public interest.
(2) Policies:
(a) Shoreline uses should be located and designed to respect private property
rights, maintain privacy of private property, be compatible with the
shoreline environment, protect ecological functions and processes, and
protect aesthetic values of the shoreline.
(b) Public access to shoreline, such as trails, bikeways, or roads, should
consider the privacy of private property owners when locating them near
private properties.
Page 210 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 21
SECTION II: Shoreline Regulations
Article I. Authority and Purpose
29.01.010 Authority
(1) The SMA of 1971, RCW 90.58, is the authority for the enactment and
administration of this SMP.
29.01.020 Applicability
(1) This SMP applies to all development, the construction or exterior alteration of
structures; dredging; drilling; dumping; filling; removal of any sand, gravel,
minerals or vegetation; bulkheading; driving of piling; placing of obstructions; or
any project of a permanent or temporary nature which interferes with the normal
public use of the surface of the waters of the state subject to Chapter 90.58 RCW
at any stage of water level. The following activities do not meet the definition of
development:
(a) Interior building improvements;
(b) Routine landscape maintenance of established, ornamental landscaping,
such as lawn mowing, pruning and weeding;
(c) Routine cleaning of the following existing facilities that does not expand
the affected area: septic tanks, wells, and individual utility service
connections;
(d) Dismantling or removing structures if there is no other associated
development or redevelopment;
(e) Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any person conducting a remedial action at a
facility pursuant to a consent decree, order, or agreed order issued
pursuant to RCW 70A.305, or to Ecology when it conducts a remedial
action under RCW 70.305;
(f) Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any person installing site improvements for
storm water treatment in an existing boatyard facility to meet requirements
of a national pollutant discharge elimination system storm water general
permit;
(g) Washington State Department of Transportation projects and activities
meeting the conditions of RCW 90.58.356;
(h) Projects consistent with an environmental excellence program agreement
pursuant to RCW 90.58.045 and RCW 43.21K;
Page 211 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 22
(i) Projects authorized through the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council
process, pursuant to RCW 80.50; and
(j) Areas and uses in those areas that are under exclusive federal jurisdiction
as established through federal or state statutes are not subject to the
jurisdiction of RCW 90.58.
(2) This SMP shall apply to all of the shoreline areas, waters, and critical areas
within the shoreline jurisdiction of the City as described in SMP Section I,
Shoreline Goals and Policies, Profile of the Shoreline Jurisdiction, within the
city limits of the City of Pasco.
(3) All proposed uses, activities, or development occurring within shoreline
jurisdiction must conform to the intent and requirements of RCW 90.58, the
SMA, and this SMP whether or not a permit or other form of authorization is
required. See SMP Shoreline Goals and Policies section for the shoreline
jurisdiction description and SMP Article VII for the definition of uses,
activities, and development.
(4) The SMP applies to shoreline jurisdiction within the City limits; this SMP will
not apply to shorelines in the UGAs until the annexation of the UGA areas to
City is finalized.
(5) Pursuant to WAC 173-27-060, federal agency activities may be required by
other federal laws to meet the permitting requirements of RCW 90.58. This
SMP shall apply to all nonfederal developments and uses undertaken on federal
lands and on lands subject to nonfederal ownership, lease, or easement, even
though such lands may fall within the external boundaries of federal ownership.
(6) As recognized by RCW 90.58.350, the provisions of this SMP shall not affect
treaty rights of Native American tribes.
(7) Maps indicating the extent of shoreline jurisdiction and shoreline designations
are guidance only. They are to be used in conjunction with the most current
scientific and technical information available, field investigations, and on-site
surveys to accurately establish the location and extent of shoreline jurisdiction
when a project is proposed. All areas meeting the definition of a shoreline of the
state or a SSWS, whether mapped or not, are subject to the provisions of this
SMP.
29.01.030 Purpose
(1) The purposes of this SMP are:
(a) To promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the City by
providing comprehensive policies and effective, reasonable regulations for
development, use, and protection of jurisdictional shorelines;
Page 212 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 23
(b) To further assume and carry out the local government responsibilities
established by the SMA in RCW 90.58.050, including planning and
administering the regulatory program consistent with the policy and
provisions of the SMA in RCW 90.58.020;
(i) To provide a high quality shoreline environment where:
(ii) Recreational opportunities are abundant;
(iii) The public enjoys access to and views of shoreline areas;
(iv) Natural systems are preserved, restored, or enhanced;
(v) Ecological functions of the shoreline are maintained and improved
over time;
(vi) Water-oriented uses are promoted consistent with the shoreline
character and environmental functions
(c) To apply special conditions to those uses that are not consistent with the
control of pollution and prevention of damage to the natural environment
or are not unique to or dependent on use of the state's shoreline; and
(d) To ensure no net loss of ecological functions associated with the shoreline.
29.01.040 Relationship to Other Codes, Ordinances, and Plans
(1) All applicable federal, state, and local laws shall apply to properties in the
shoreline jurisdiction. Where this SMP makes reference to any RCW, WAC, or
other state or federal law or regulation, the most recent amendment or current
edition shall apply.
(2) In the event provisions of this SMP conflict with provisions of federal, state, or
city regulations, the provision that is most protective of shoreline resources shall
prevail. It is understood that the provisions of this SMP may not allow
development to occur at what otherwise might be the property's full zoning
potential.
(a) Local plans or programs include, but are not limited to:
(i) PMC 24.20 – Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection
(ii) PMC Title 23, Environmental Impact
(iii) PMC Title 25, Zoning
(b) State and federal programs include, but are not limited to:
(i) Washington State Hydraulic Project Permits (HPA)
Page 213 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 24
(ii) Washington State Pesticide Applicator License Requirements
(iii) Washington State Waste Discharge Permits
(iv) Washington State Water Quality Certification Requirements (401)
(v) USACE 404 Permits and Section 10 Permits
(3) The policies in the SMP, contained in the SMP elements, state those underlying
objectives that the regulations are intended to accomplish. The policies guide
the interpretation and enforcement of the SMP regulations contained in
PMC 29.01. The policies are not regulations in themselves and, therefore, do
not impose requirements beyond those set forth in the regulations.
(4) This SMP contains Critical Area Regulations in PMC 29.01 Article V,
applicable only in shoreline jurisdictions that provide a level of protection to
critical areas assuring no net loss of shoreline ecological functions necessary to
sustain shoreline natural resources (RCW 36.70A.480). In the event of a conflict
between the requirements of this code and any other code or ordinance of the
City, the regulation that provides the greater protection for the particular critical
area within shoreline jurisdiction shall apply.
(5) Projects in the shoreline jurisdiction that have either been deemed technically
complete through the application process or have been approved through local
and state reviews prior to the adoption of this SMP are considered accepted.
Major changes or new phases of projects that were not included in the originally
approved plan will be subject to the policies and regulations of this SMP.
29.01.050 Liberal Construction
(1) According to RCW 90.58.900, SMA is exempted from the rule of strict
construction, and it shall be liberally construed to give full effect to the
objectives and purposes for which it was enacted.
29.01.060 Severability
(1) Should any section or provision of this SMP be declared invalid, such decision
shall not affect the validity of this SMP as a whole.
29.01.070 Effective Date
(1) The SMP is hereby adopted on XX 2023. This SMP and all amendments thereto
shall become effective fourteen (14) days after final approval and adoption by
Ecology.
Page 214 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 25
29.01.080 Definitions
(1) "Act" means the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA),
Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 90.58.
(2) "Additions" means improvements to an existing building or structure, the cost
of which does not exceed 50% of the assessed value of the total structure or
result in an increase greater than 25% of the building footprint (up to a
maximum of 500 square feet) before the addition is started. Additions must
share a common wall (one full side) with the original structure.
(3) "Adjacent," for purposes of applying Article V – Critical Areas, means
immediately adjoining (in contact with the boundary of the influence area) or
within a distance less than that needed to separate activities from critical areas
to ensure protection of the functions and values of the critical areas. Adjacent
shall mean any activity or development located:
(a) On-site immediately adjoining a critical area; or
(b) A distance equal to or less than the required critical area buffer width and
building setback.
(4) "Agricultural activities" means agricultural uses and practices including, but not
limited to: producing, breeding, or increasing agricultural products; rotating and
changing agricultural crops; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie
fallow in which it is plowed and tilled but left unseeded; allowing land used for
agricultural activities to lie dormant as a result of adverse agricultural market
conditions; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant because
the land is enrolled in a local, state, or federal conservation program, or the land
is subject to a conservation easement; conducting agricultural operations;
maintaining, repairing, and replacing agricultural equipment; maintaining,
repairing, and replacing agricultural facilities, provided that the replacement
facility is no closer to the shoreline than the original facility; and maintaining
agricultural lands under production or cultivation. Also see definition of
"New Agricultural Activities" below.
(5) "Agricultural products" includes: but is not limited to horticultural, viticultural,
floricultural, and vegetable, fruit, berry, grain, hops, hay, straw, turf, sod, seed,
and apiary products; feed or forage for livestock; Christmas trees; hybrid
cottonwood and similar hardwood trees grown as crops and harvested within
20 years of planting; and livestock, including both the animals themselves and
animal products including, but not limited to, meat, upland finfish, poultry and
poultry products, and dairy products.
(6) "Agricultural equipment" includes, but is not limited to, the following used in
agricultural operations:
Page 215 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 26
(a) Equipment; machinery; constructed shelters, buildings, and ponds; fences;
upland finfish rearing facilities; water diversion, withdrawal, conveyance,
and use equipment and facilities including, but not limited to, pumps,
pipes, tapes, canals, ditches, and drains;
(b) Corridors and facilities for transporting personnel, livestock, and
equipment to, from, and within agricultural lands;
(c) Farm residences and associated equipment, lands, and facilities; and
(d) Roadside stands and on-farm markets for marketing fruit or vegetables.
(7) "Agricultural land" means those specific land areas on which agriculture
activities are conducted as of the date of adoption of a local Shoreline Master
Program (SMP) pursuant to these guidelines as evidenced by aerial photography
or other documentation. After the effective date of the SMP, land converted to
agricultural use is subject to compliance with the requirements of the SMP.
(8) "Alteration," for purposes of applying Article V – Critical Areas, means any
human-induced change in an existing condition of a critical area or its buffer.
Alterations include grading, filling, dredging, channelizing, clearing
(vegetation), applying pesticides, discharging waste, construction, compaction,
excavation, modifying for stormwater management, relocating, or other
activities that change the existing landform, vegetation, hydrology, wildlife, or
habitat value of critical areas.
(9) "Amendment" means a revision, update, addition, deletion, and/or reenactment
to an existing SMP.
(10) "Applicant" means a person who files an application for a permit under this
SMP and who is either the owner of the land on which that proposed activity
would be located, a contract purchaser, or the authorized agent of such a person.
(11) "Approval" means an official action by a local government legislative body
agreeing to submit a proposed SMP or amendments to Ecology for review and
official action pursuant to this SMP or an official action by Ecology to make a
local government SMP effective, thereby incorporating the approved SMP or
amendment into the SMP.
(12) "Aquaculture" means the culture or farming of fish or other aquatic plants and
animals.
(13) "Aquifer recharge area" means an area through which precipitation and surface
water infiltrate the soil and are transmitted through rocks and soil to create
groundwater storage. They are also areas where an aquifer that is a source of
drinking water is vulnerable to contamination that would affect the potability of
water.
Page 216 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 27
(14) "Area of Influence" encompasses an area that is 2.5 times the height of a slope.
The Area of Influence applies to areas that have geologically hazardous
attributes consistent with an Erosion or Landslide Hazard Area as defined in
Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) 29.01.080, Definitions, and PMC 29.01.560,
Geological Hazard Areas. This mapped area surrounds the hazard area from all
points for a distance of 2.5 times the height of the applicable slope. Areas with a
15% slope or greater as its only attribute do not have an Area of Influence.
(15) "Assessed value" means assessed valuation shall be as established by the
County assessor's office, unless otherwise provided by a market appraisal
institute appraisal.
(16) "Associated wetlands" are those wetlands that are in proximity to and either
influence or are influenced by a stream subject to the SMA.
(17) "Average grade level" means the average of the natural or existing topography
of the portion of the lot, parcel, or tract of real property that will be directly
under the proposed building or structure. In the case of structures to be built
over water, average grade level shall be the elevation of the ordinary high water
mark (OHWM). Calculation of the average grade level shall be made by
averaging the ground elevations at the midpoint of all exterior walls of the
proposed building or structure.
(18) "Base flood" means a flood having a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in
any given year. Also referred to as the "100-year flood." Designated on FIRM
with the letters A or V.
(19) "Base flood elevation" means the water surface elevation of the base flood. It
shall be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988.
(20) "Basement" means any area of a building having its floor subgrade (below
ground level) on all sides.
(21) "Best management practices (BMPs)" means conservation practices or systems
of practice and management measures that:
(a) Control soil loss and reduce water quality degradation caused by high
concentrations of nutrients, animal waste, toxics, and sediment;
(b) Minimize adverse impacts on surface water and groundwater flow, and
circulation patterns, and the chemical, physical, and biological
characteristics of wetlands;
(c) Protect trees and vegetation designated to be retained during and following
site construction; and
(d) Provide standards for proper use of chemical herbicides within critical
areas.
Page 217 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 28
(22) "Boating facilities" allowed in the City include boat launches and upland boat
storage, marinas, and other boat moorage structures or uses. For the purposes of
this SMP, boating facilities excludes docks serving four or fewer single-family
residences.
(23) "Breakwater" means an offshore structure whose primary purpose is to protect
harbors, moorages, and navigation activity from wave and wind action by
creating stillwater areas along shore. A secondary purpose is to protect
shorelines from wave-caused erosion. Breakwaters are generally built parallel to
shore, may or may not be connected to land, and may be floating or stationary.
(24) "Buffer, Critical Areas," means an area, which provides the margin of safety
through protection of slope stability, attenuation of surface water flows and
landslide hazards reasonably necessary to minimize risk to the public from loss
of life or well-being or property damage resulting from natural disasters, or an
area which is an integral part of a stream or wetland ecosystem and which
provides shading, input of organic debris and coarse sediments, room for
variation in stream or wetland boundaries, habitat for wildlife and protection
from harmful intrusion necessary to protect the public from losses suffered
when the functions and values of aquatic resources are degraded.
(25) "City" means the City of Pasco.
(26) "Clearing" means the cutting, killing, grubbing, or removing of vegetation or
other organic material by physical, mechanical, chemical, or any other similar
means.
(27) "Cluster" means a group of three or more significant trees with overlapping or
touching crowns.
(28) "Community access" means a shoreline access available to a group or
community (e.g., homeowners association), which may not be accessible to
general public.
(29) "Compensation project" means actions specifically designed to replace
project-induced critical area and buffer losses. Compensation project design
elements may include land acquisition, planning, construction plans,
monitoring, and contingency actions.
(30) "Compensatory mitigation" means types of mitigation used to replace project-
induced critical areas and buffer losses or impacts.
(31) "Critical aquifer recharge area" means those areas that are:
(a) Designated as "Wellhead Protection Areas" pursuant to the Washington
Administrative Code (WAC) 246-290-135(4) and the groundwater
contribution area in WAC 246-291-100 (2)(e). Wellhead protection areas
shall, for the purpose of this regulation, include the identified recharge
Page 218 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 29
areas associated with either Group A public water supply wells and those
Group B wells with a Wellhead Protection Plan filed with the
Franklin County Health District; and
(b) Identified in the Soil Survey of Pasco as having high potential for aquifer
recharge, including those soil types identified by the
Shoreline Administrator.
(32) "Crown" means the area of a tree containing leaf- or needle-bearing branches.
(33) "Cultural and historic resources" means buildings, sites and areas having
archaeological, historic, cultural, or scientific value or significance.
(34) "Development" means a use consisting of the construction or exterior alteration
of structures; dredging; drilling; dumping; filling; removal of any sand, gravel,
or minerals; bulk heading; driving of piling; placing of obstructions; or any
project of a permanent or temporary nature, which interferes with the normal
public use of the surface of the waters overlying lands subject to the act at any
stage of water level. “Development” does not include dismantling or removing
structures if there is no other associated development or re-development.
(35) "Development permit" means any permit issued by the City or other authorized
agency, for construction, land use, or the alteration of land.
(36) "Dock" means, as a general term, a structure, or group of structures that
provides boat moorage or other uses. A dock may be made up of piers (which
are structures on fixed piles) and floats (which float on the water's surface and
are typically attached to piles so that they may rise and fall with changes in the
water's elevation).
(37) "Dredging" means the removal of sediments from the bed of a waterbody by
mechanical means.
(38) "Ecosystem-wide processes" means the suite of naturally occurring physical and
geologic processes of erosion, transport, and deposition, and specific chemical
processes that shape landforms within a specific shoreline ecosystem and
determine the types of habitat and the associated ecological functions.
(39) "Erosion" means the detachment and movement of soil or rock by water, wind,
ice, or gravity.
(40) "Erosion hazard area" means those areas that, because of natural characteristics,
including vegetative cover, soil texture, slope gradient, rainfall patterns, or
human-induced changes to such characteristics, are vulnerable to erosion.
(41) "Feasible" means, for the purpose of this SMP, that an action, such as a
development project, mitigation, or preservation requirement, meets all of the
following conditions: (a) the action can be accomplished with technologies and
Page 219 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 30
methods that have been used in the past in similar circumstances, or studies or
tests have demonstrated in similar circumstances that such approaches are
currently available and likely to achieve the intended results; (b) the action
provides a reasonable likelihood of achieving its intended purpose; and (c) the
action does not physically preclude achieving the project's primary intended
legal use. In cases where these guidelines require certain actions, unless they are
infeasible, the burden of proving infeasibility is on the applicant. In determining
an action's infeasibility, the reviewing agency may weigh the action's relative
public costs and public benefits, considered in the short-and long-term time
frames.
(42) "Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)" means the agency that
oversees the administration of the National Flood Insurance Program (44 Code
of Federal Regulation [CFR]).
(43) "Fill" means the addition of soil, sand, rock, gravel, sediment, earth retaining
structure, or other material to an area waterward of the OHWM, in wetlands or
on shoreline areas in a manner that raises the elevation or creates dry land.
(44) "Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas" means areas necessary for
maintaining species in suitable habitats within their natural geographic
distribution so isolated subpopulations are not created as designated by
WAC 365-190-080(5). These areas include:
(a) Areas within which state and federal endangered and threatened species
exist, or state sensitive, candidate, and monitor species have a primary
association;
(b) Priority Habitat and Species Areas identified by the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW);
(c) Habitats and species of local importance that have been designated by the
City at the time of application;
(d) Naturally occurring ponds less than 20 acres and their submerged aquatic
beds that provide fish or wildlife habitat. These do not include ponds
deliberately designed and created from dry sites such as canals, detention
facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, temporary
construction ponds of less than 3 years duration, and landscape amenities.
Naturally occurring ponds may include those artificial ponds intentionally
created from dry areas in order to mitigate conversion of ponds, if
permitted by a regulatory authority;
(e) Waters of the state as defined by WAC 222-16;
(f) Lakes, ponds, streams, and rivers planted with game fish by a
governmental or tribal entity;
Page 220 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 31
(g) Areas with which anadromous fish species have a primary association; and
(h) State natural area preserves and natural resources conservation areas.
(45) "Flood" or "flooding" mean a general and temporary condition of partial or
complete inundation of normally dry land areas from the overflow of inland
waters and/or the unusual and rapid accumulation of runoff or surface waters
from any source.
(46) "Flood hazard area" means any area subject to inundation by the base flood or
risk from channel migration, including, but not limited to, an aquatic area,
wetland, or closed depression.
(47) "Flood insurance rate map (FIRM)" means the official map on which the
Federal Insurance Administration has delineated both the areas of special flood
hazards and the risk premium zones applicable to the City.
(48) "Flood protection elevation" means an elevation that is 1 foot or more above the
base flood elevation.
(49) "Floodplain" is synonymous with 100-year floodplain and means that land area
susceptible to inundation with a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any
given year. The limit of this area shall be based on flood ordinance regulation
maps or a reasonable method, which meets the objectives of the SMA.
(50) "Floodway" means the area, as identified in a master program, that has been
established in a federal emergency management agency flood insurance rate
maps or floodway maps.
(51) "Functions" and "values," for purposes of applying Article V – Critical Areas,
mean the beneficial roles served by critical areas, including, but not limited to,
water quality protection and enhancement, fish and wildlife habitat, food chain
support, flood storage, conveyance and attenuation, groundwater recharge and
discharge, erosion control, and recreation. Functions and values may be
considered independently, with functions being measured indicators such as
water quality, hydrologic functions, and habitat functions and values being
non-measured indicators such as local importance, potential qualities, or
recreational benefits.
(52) "Geological hazard areas" means areas that, because of their susceptibility to
erosion, sliding, earthquake, or other geologic events, are not suited to the siting
of commercial, residential, or industrial development consistent with public
health or safety concerns. Geological Hazard Areas include Erosion Hazards,
Landslide Hazards, Mine Hazards, and Seismic Hazards, as defined herein and
specified in PMC 29.01.560.
(53) "Geotechnical Report" or "geotechnical analysis" means a scientific study or
evaluation conducted by a qualified expert that includes a description of the
Page 221 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 32
ground and surface hydrology and geology, the affected landform and its
susceptibility to mass wasting, erosion, and other geologic hazards or processes,
conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of the proposed
development on geologic conditions, the adequacy of the site to be developed,
the impacts of the proposed development, alternative approaches to the
proposed development, and measures to mitigate potential site-specific and
cumulative geological and hydrological impacts of the proposed development,
including the potential adverse impacts on adjacent and down-current
properties. Geotechnical Reports shall conform to accepted technical standards
and must be prepared by qualified professional engineers or geologists who
have professional expertise about the regional and local shoreline geology and
processes.
(54) "Grading" means stripping, cutting, filling, or stockpiling of land, including the
land in its cut or filled condition to create new grade.
(55) "Groin" means a barrier type of structure extending from the streambank into a
waterbody for the purpose of the protection of a shoreline and adjacent uplands
by influencing the movement of water or deposition of materials.
(56) "Ground cover" means all types of vegetation other than trees.
(57) "Guidelines" means those standards adopted by the department to implement
the policy of RCW 90.58 for regulation of use of the shorelines of the state prior
to adoption of SMPs. Such standards shall also provide criteria for local
governments and the department in developing and amending SMPs.
(58) "Hazard areas" means areas designated as frequently flooded or geologically
hazardous areas due to potential for erosion, landslide, seismic activity, mine
collapse, or other geologically hazardous conditions, including steep slopes.
(59) "Hazardous substance(s)" means:
(a) A hazardous substance as defined by Section 101(14) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act; any substance designated pursuant to Section 311(b)(2)(A) of the
Clean Water Act (CWA); any hazardous waste having the characteristics
identified under or listed pursuant to Section 3001 of the Solid Waste
Disposal Act (but not including any waste the regulation of which under
the Solid Waste Disposal Act has been suspended by Act of Congress);
any toxic pollutant listed under Section 307(a) of the CWA; or any
imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture with respect to
which the United States Environmental Protection Agency has taken
action pursuant to Section 7 of the Toxic Substances Control Act; and
(b) Hazardous substances that include any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge,
including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste,
regardless of quantity, that exhibit any of the physical, chemical, or
Page 222 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 33
biological properties described in WAC 173-303-090, 173-303-102, or
173-303-103.
(60) "High-intensity land use" means land uses consisting of commercial, urban,
industrial, institutional, retail, residential with more than one unit per acre,
agricultural (dairies, nurseries, raising and harvesting crops, requiring annual
tilling, and raising and maintaining animals), high-intensity recreation
(golf courses, ball fields), and hobby farms.
(61) "Hydraulic project approval (HPA)" means a permit issued by WDFW for
modification to waters of the state in accordance with RCW 75.20.
(62) "Impervious surface area" means a hard surface area, which either prevents or
retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior
to development. Impervious surface shall also include a hard surface area,
which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased
rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to
development. Common impervious surfaces include rooftops, walkways, patios,
driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel
roads with compacted subgrade, packed earthen materials, and oiled, macadam
or other surfaces, which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater.
Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities shall not be considered as
impervious surfaces.
(63) "In-stream structures" function for the impoundment, diversion, or use of water
for hydroelectric generation and transmission (including public and private
facilities), flood control, irrigation, water supply (domestic and industrial),
recreation, or fisheries enhancement.
(64) "Invasive, non-native vegetation species" means the plants listed for
Eastern Washington in Washington State Noxious Weed Board Publication
# 820-264E (N/6/09), or the latest version of this document.
(65) "Isolated wetland" means those wetlands and their buffers that are outside of the
following critical areas and their buffers, where applicable: 100-year floodplain,
lake, river, stream, or wetland. Isolated wetlands have no contiguous hydric soil
or hydrophytic vegetation between the wetland and any surface water.
(66) "Landslide" means down slope movement of a mass of soil, rock, snow or ice,
including, but not limited to, rock falls, slumps, mud flows, debris flows,
torrents, earth flows, and snow avalanches.
(67) "Landslide hazard areas" means those areas potentially subject to landslides
based on a combination of geologic, topographic, and hydrologic factors.
(68) "Low-intensity land use" includes forestry and open space (such as passive
recreation and natural resources preservation).
Page 223 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 34
(69) "May" means the action is acceptable, provided it conforms to the provisions of
this SMP.
(70) "Mitigation sequencing" means the process of avoiding, reducing, or
compensating for the adverse environmental impact(s) of a proposal, including
the following actions, listed in the order of preference, the first being the most
preferred:
(a) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an
action;
(b) Where impact on critical areas or their buffers will not be avoided,
demonstrating that the impact meets the criteria for granting a
Shoreline Variance Permit or other administratively approved alteration;
(c) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and
its implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking
affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts;
(d) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected
environment;
(e) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and
maintenance operations during the life of the action;
(f) Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing
substitute resources or environments; and
(g) Monitoring the impact and the compensation projects and taking
appropriate corrective measures.
(71) “Mixed-use” or “Mixed-use development” means a combination of uses within
the same building or site as a part of an integrated development project with
functional interrelationships and coherent physical design that includes a mix of
water-oriented and non-water-oriented uses.
(72) "Moderate-intensity land use" includes residential at a density of 1-unit-per-acre
or less, moderate-intensity open space (parks), and agriculture (moderate
intensity land uses such as orchards and hay fields).
(73) "Monitoring" means the collection of data by various methods for the purpose
of understanding natural systems and features, evaluating the impact of
development proposals on such systems, and/or assessing the performance of
mitigation measures imposed as conditions of development.
(74) "Must" means a mandate; the action is required.
(75) "Native vegetation" means plant species that are indigenous to the region.
Page 224 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 35
(76) "New agricultural activities" are activities that meet the definition of agricultural
activities but are proposed on land not in agricultural use at the adoption date of
this SMP.
(77) "New construction" means structures for which the start of construction
commenced on or after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this SMP.
(78) “Nonconforming development” or “nonconforming structure” means an existing
structure that was lawfully constructed at the time it was built but is no longer
fully consistent with present regulations such as setbacks, buffers or yards; area;
bulk; height or density standards due to subsequent changes to the master
program.
(79) “Nonconforming lot” means a lot that met dimensional requirements of the
applicable master program at the time of its establishment but now contains less
than the required width, depth or area due to subsequent changes to the master
program.
(80) “Nonconforming use” means an existing shoreline use that was lawfully
established prior to the effective date of the act or the applicable master
program, but which does not conform to present use regulations due to
subsequent changes to the master program.
(81) "Non-water-oriented uses" means those uses that are not water-dependent,
water-related, or water-enjoyment.
(82) “Normal maintenance” means those usual acts that are necessary to prevent a
property’s decline, lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition.
(83) “Normal repair” means to restore a structure or development to a state
comparable to its original condition including, but not limited to, its size, shape,
configuration, location, and external appearance, within a reasonable period
after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse
impacts on shoreline resources or environment. Replacement of a structure or
development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the
common method of repair for the type of structure or development, and the
replacement structure or development is comparable to the original structure or
development including, but not limited to, its size, shape, configuration,
location, and external appearance, and the replacement does not cause
substantial adverse impacts on shoreline resources or environment.
(84) "Ordinary high water mark (OHWM)" means that mark that will be found by
examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of
waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as
to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in
respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may naturally
change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or
the department. Where the OHWM cannot be found, it shall be the line of mean
Page 225 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 36
high water. For braided streams, the OHWM is found on the banks forming the
outer limits of the depression within which the braiding occurs.
(85) "Practical alternative" means an alternative that is available and capable of
being carried out after taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and
logistics in light of overall project purposes, and having less impact on critical
areas.
(86) “Primitive trail” means unimproved and unpaved, but physically defined
pathway for non motorized movement.”
(87) "Priority habitat" means a habitat type with unique or significant value to one or
more species. An area classified and mapped as priority habitat must have one
or more of the following attributes:
(a) Comparatively high fish or wildlife density;
(b) Comparatively high fish or wildlife species diversity;
(c) Fish spawning habitat;
(d) Important wildlife habitat;
(e) Important fish or wildlife seasonal range;
(f) Important fish or wildlife movement corridor;
(g) Rearing and foraging habitat;
(h) Refugia habitat;
(i) Limited availability;
(j) High vulnerability to habitat alteration; or
(k) Unique or dependent species.
A priority habitat may be described by a unique vegetation type or by a dominant
plant species that is of primary importance to fish and wildlife. A priority habitat
may also be described by a successional stage (such as old growth and mature
forests). Alternatively, a priority habitat may consist of a specific habitat element
(such as caves or snags) of key value to fish and wildlife. A priority habitat may
contain priority and/or non-priority fish and wildlife.
(88) "Priority species" means species requiring protective measures and/or
management guidelines to ensure their persistence at genetically viable
population levels. Priority species are those that meet any of the following
criteria:
Page 226 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 37
(a) Criterion 1. State-listed or state-proposed species. State-listed species are
those native fish and wildlife species legally designated as endangered
(WAC 232-12-014), threatened (WAC 232-12-011), or sensitive
(WAC 232-12-011). State-proposed species are those fish and wildlife
species that will be reviewed by the WDFW (POL-M-6001) for possible
listing as endangered, threatened, or sensitive according to the process and
criteria defined in WAC 232-12-297.
(b) Criterion 2. Vulnerable aggregations. Vulnerable aggregations include
those species or groups of animals susceptible to significant population
declines, within a specific area or statewide, by virtue of their inclination
to congregate.
(c) Criterion 3. Species of recreational, commercial, and/or tribal importance.
Native and non-native fish and wildlife species of recreational or
commercial importance and recognized species used for tribal ceremonial
and subsistence purposes that are vulnerable to habitat loss or degradation.
(d) Criterion 4. Species listed under the Federal Endangered Species Act as
either proposed, threatened, or endangered.
(89) "Provisions" means any definition, policy, goal, regulation, requirement,
standard, authorization, prohibition, guideline criteria, or environment
designations.
(90) "Public Access" means physical and visual access. Public access includes the
ability of the general public to reach, touch, and enjoy the water's edge, to travel
on the waters of the state, and to view the water and the shoreline from adjacent
locations. The following are examples of public access:
(a) Visual Access. Visual public access may consist of view corridors,
viewpoints, or other means of visual approach to public waters, adjoining
habitat and wildlife areas. A visual aesthetic will include vegetation and
wildlife that exist along the shoreline and not just a view of the water.
(b) Physical Access. Physical public access may consist of a dedication of
land or easement and a physical improvement in the form of a walkway,
trail, bikeway, park, boat or canoe and kayak launching ramp, dock area,
view platform, or other area serving as a means of physical approach to
public waters.
(91) “Public Access Plan” means the City of Pasco’s Rivershore Linkage and
Amenity Plan adopted on July 16, 2012.
(92) "Public agency" means every city, county, state, or federal office, every officer,
every institution, whether educational, correctional, or other, and every
department, division, board, and commission that provides services or
recommendations to the public or other such agencies.
Page 227 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 38
(93) "Public utility" means a public service corporation performing some public
service subject to special governmental regulations, or a governmental agency
performing similar public services, either of which are paid for directly by the
recipients thereof. Such services shall include water supply, electric power, gas,
and transportation for persons and freight.
(94) "Qualified professional" means a person with experience and training in the
pertinent discipline, and who is a qualified expert with expertise appropriate for
the relevant critical area or shoreline subject. A qualified professional must have
obtained a B.S., B.A., or equivalent degree or certification in biology,
engineering, environmental studies, fisheries, geomorphology, landscape
architecture, forestry or related field, and 2 years of related work experience.
(a) A qualified professional for wildlife, habitats, or wetlands must have a
degree in biology, zoology, ecology, fisheries, or related field, and
professional experience in Washington State.
(b) A qualified professional for a geological hazard must be a professional
engineer or geologist, licensed in the State of Washington.
(c) A qualified professional for critical aquifer recharge areas means a
hydrogeologist, geologist, engineer, or other scientist with experience in
preparing hydrogeologic assessments.
(d) A qualified professional with flood and channel migration zone expertise
must be a hydrologist or fluvial geomorphologist.
(e) A qualified professional for vegetation management must be a registered
landscape architect, certified arborist, biologist, or professional forester
with a corresponding degree or certification.
(f) A qualified archaeologist must be a person qualified for addressing
cultural and historic resources protection and preservation, with a degree
in archaeology, anthropology, history, classics or other germane
disciplines with a specialization in archaeology and/or historic
preservation and with a minimum of 2 years of experience in preparing
Cultural Resource Site Assessments reports.
(95) "Recreational development" means the modification of the natural or existing
environment to accommodate commercial and public facilities designed and
used to provide recreational opportunities to the public. Commercial
recreational development should be consistent with commercial development
defined herein.
(96) "Recreational vehicle" means a vehicle designed primarily for recreational
camping, travel, or seasonal use that has its own mode of power or is mounted
on or towed by another vehicle, including, but not limited, to travel trailers,
folding camping trailers, truck campers, motor homes, motorized boats, and
Page 228 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 39
multi-use vehicles or any structure inspected, approved, and designated a
recreational vehicle by and bearing the insignia of the State of Washington or
any other state or federal agency having the authority to approve recreational
vehicles.
(97) “Research and Monitoring” includes activities associated with identifying data,
and collecting, monitoring, and evaluating scientific data and information to
support water, fisheries, and other ecological services management, restoration,
and operational activities. Example activities that could be included under this
category include installing and operating stream and water quality monitoring
gages, collecting fisheries data using a trap or other devices, setting up and
using equipment to collect sediment data, and other data collection activities
that need to utilize the shoreline and waters of the state to meet public
objectives.
(98) "Residential development" entails one or more buildings, structures, lots,
parcels or portions thereof that are designed, used, or intended to be used as a
place of abode for human beings. These include single-family residences,
residential subdivisions, short residential subdivisions, attached dwellings, and
all accessory uses or structures normally associated with residential uses.
Accessory residential uses include garages, sheds, tennis courts, swimming
pools, parking areas, fences, cabanas, saunas, and guest cottages. Hotels,
motels, dormitories, or any other type of overnight or transient housing are
excluded from the residential category and must be considered commercial uses
depending on project characteristics.
(99) "Restore," "Restoration," or "Ecological restoration" means the reestablishment
or upgrading of impaired natural or enhanced ecological shoreline processes or
functions. This may be accomplished through measures, including, but not
limited to, revegetation, removal of intrusive shoreline structures, and removal
or treatment of toxic materials. Restoration does not imply a requirement for
returning the shoreline area to pre-aboriginal, or pre-European settlement
conditions.
(100) "Riparian habitat" means areas adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water
that contains elements of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems that mutually
influence each other.
(101) "Salmonid" means a member of the fish family Salmonidae, including: King,
Chinook, Coho, chum, sockeye, and pink salmon; cutthroat, brook, brown,
rainbow, and steelhead trout; kokanee; and native char (bull trout and
Dolly Varden).
(102) "Seismic hazard areas" means areas that are subject to severe risk of damage as
a result of earthquake-induced ground shaking, slope failure, settlement, or soil
liquefaction.
Page 229 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 40
(103) "Shall" means a mandate; the action must be done.
(104) "Shoreline areas" and "shoreline jurisdiction" means all "shorelines of the state"
and "shorelands" as defined in RCW 90.58.030.
(105) "Shoreline Master Program" means the comprehensive use plan for a described
area and the use regulations together with maps, diagrams, charts, or other
descriptive material and text, a statement of desired goals, and standards
developed in accordance with the policies enunciated in RCW 90.58.020. As
provided in RCW 36.70A.480, the goals and policies of an SMP for a county or
city approved under RCW 90.58 shall be considered an element of the county or
City's Comprehensive Plan. All other portions of the SMP for a county or city
adopted under RCW 90.58, including use regulations, shall be considered a part
of the county or city's development regulations.
(106) "Shoreline modifications" means those actions that modify the physical
configuration or qualities of the shoreline area, usually through the construction
of a physical element such as a dike, breakwater, pier, weir, dredged basin, fill,
bulkhead, or other shoreline structure. They can include other actions, such as
clearing, grading, or application of chemicals.
(107) "Shoreline stabilization" means actions taken to address erosion impacts to
property and dwellings, businesses, or structures caused by natural processes
such as current, flood, wind, or wave action. These actions include structural
and non-structural methods. Non-structural methods include building setbacks,
relocation of the structure to be protected, groundwater management, and
planning and regulatory measures to avoid the need for structural stabilization.
(108) "Should" means that the particular action is required unless there is a
demonstrated, compelling reason, based on policy of the SMA and this SMP,
against taking the action.
(109) "Significant adverse environmental impacts" (as used in State Environmental
Policy Act [SEPA]) means a reasonable likelihood of more than a moderate
adverse impact on environmental quality (WAC 197-11-794).
(110) "Significant vegetation removal" means the removal or alteration of trees,
shrubs, and/or ground cover by clearing, grading, cutting, burning, chemical
means, or other activity that causes significant ecological impacts on functions
provided by such vegetation. The removal of invasive or noxious weeds does
not constitute significant vegetation removal. Tree pruning, not including tree
topping, where it does not affect ecological functions, does not constitute
significant vegetation removal.
(111) "Snag" means the remaining trunk of a dying, diseased, or dangerous tree that is
reduced in height and stripped of all live branches.
Page 230 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 41
(112) "Special flood hazard area" means an area subject to a base or 100-year flood;
areas of special flood hazard are shown on a flood hazard boundary map or
flood insurance rate map as Zone A, AO, A1-30, AE, A99, AH.
(113) "Species and habitats of local importance" means those species that may not be
endangered, threatened, or critical from a state-wide perspective, but are of local
concern due to their population status, sensitivity to habitat manipulation, or
other educational, cultural, or historic attributes. These species may be priority
habitats, priority species, and those habitats and species identified in the critical
areas code as having local importance (e.g., elk).
(114) "Species, threatened and endangered" means those native species that are listed
by WDFW pursuant to RCW 77.12.070 as threatened (WAC 232-12-011) or
endangered (WAC 232-12-014), or that are listed as threatened or endangered
under the Federal Endangered Species Act (16 U.S. Code 1533).
(115) "Start of construction" means and includes substantial improvement and means
the date the building permit was issued, provided the actual start of
construction, repair, reconstruction, placement, or other improvement was
within 180 days of the permit issuance date. For cumulative tracking, the permit
may extend beyond the specified time frame to the time of permit completion.
The actual start means either the first placement of permanent construction of a
structure on a site such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of
piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation,
or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation. Permanent
construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading, and
filling, nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways, nor does it
include excavation for a basement, footings, piers, or foundation or the erection
of temporary forms, nor does it include the installation on the property of
accessory buildings such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or
not part of the main structure. For a substantial improvement, the actual start of
construction means the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other
structural part of a building, whether or not that alteration affects the external
dimensions of the building.
(116) "Steep slopes" means those slopes (excluding City-approved geotechnical
engineered slopes) 40% or steeper within a vertical elevation change of at least
10 feet. A slope is defined by establishing its toe and top and is measured by
averaging the inclination over at least 10 feet of vertical relief.
(117) "Stream" means any portion of a channel, bed, bank, or bottom waterward of
the OHWM of waters of the state, including areas in which fish may spawn,
reside, or pass, and tributary waters with defined bed or banks, which influence
the quality of fish habitat downstream. This includes watercourses that flow on
an intermittent basis or fluctuate in level during the year and applies to the
entire bed of such watercourse whether or not the water is at peak level. This
definition does not include irrigation ditches, canals, stormwater runoff devices,
Page 231 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 42
or other entirely artificial watercourses, except where they exist in a natural
watercourse that has been altered by humans.
(118) "Structure" means a permanent or temporary edifice or building, or any piece of
work artificially built or comprising parts joined together in some definite
manner, whether installed on, above, or below the surface of the ground or
water.
(119) "Substantial damage" means damage of any origin, including intentional and
unintentional demolition, sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring
the structure to its before-damaged condition would equal or exceed 50% of the
assessed value of the structure before the damage occurred.
(120) "Substantial improvement" means any rehabilitation, repair, reconstruction,
addition, or other improvement of a building when the cost of the improvement
equals or exceeds 50% of the market value of the building before start of
construction of the improvement. The term includes buildings that have incurred
substantial damage or damage of any origin sustained by a building when the
cost of restoring the building to its pre-damaged condition would equal or
exceed 50% of the market value before the damage occurred. Substantial
improvement does not include any project for improvement of a structure to
correct existing violations of state or local health, sanitary, or safety code
specifications, which have been identified by the local code enforcement official
and are the minimum necessary to ensure safe living conditions or any alteration
of a historic structure, provided that the alteration will not preclude the
structure’s continued designation as a historic structure.
(121) "Substantially degrade" means to cause significant ecological impact.
(122) "Thinning" means the evenly spaced non-commercial removal of up to 40% of
trees and woody shrubs.
(123) "Topping" means the severing of main trunks or stems of vegetation at any
place above 25% of the vegetation height.
(124) "Transportation facilities" are those structures and developments that provide
for the movement of people, goods, and services. These include roads and
highways, railroad facilities, bridges, parking facilities, bicycle paths, trails, and
other related facilities.
(125) "Trees" means any living woody plant characterized by one main stem or trunk
and many branches and having a diameter of four inches or more measured
24 inches above ground level.
(126) "Unavoidable" means adverse impacts that remain after all appropriate and
practicable avoidance and minimization have been achieved.
Page 232 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 43
(127) "Utility" means a service and/or facility that produces, transmits, carries, stores,
processes, or disposes of electrical power, gas, potable water, stormwater,
communications (including, but not limited to, telephone and cable), sewage,
oil, and the like.
(128) "Vegetation" means plant life growing below, at, and above the soil surface.
(129) "Water-dependent use" means a use or portion of a use that cannot exist in a
location that is not adjacent to the water and that is dependent on the water by
reason of the intrinsic nature of its operations.
(130) "Water-enjoyment use" means a recreational use or other use that facilitates
public access to the shoreline as a primary characteristic of the use or a use that
provides for recreational use or aesthetic enjoyment of the shoreline for a
substantial number of people as a general characteristic of the use, and which
through location, design, and operation ensures the public's ability to enjoy the
physical and aesthetic qualities of the shoreline. In order to qualify as a
water-enjoyment use, the use must be open to the general public and the
shoreline-oriented space within. The project must be devoted to the specific
aspects of the use that fosters shoreline enjoyment.
(131) "Water-oriented use" means a use that is water-dependent, water-related, or
water-enjoyment, or a combination of such uses.
(132) "Water quality" means the physical characteristics of water within shoreline
jurisdiction, including water quantity, hydrological, physical, chemical,
aesthetic, recreation-related, and biological characteristics. Where used in this
SMP, the term water quantity refers only to development and uses regulated
under this chapter and affecting water quantity such as impermeable surfaces
and stormwater handling practices. Water quantity, for purposes of this chapter,
does not mean the withdrawal of groundwater or diversion of surface water
pursuant to RCW 90.03.250 through 90.03.340.
(133) "Water-related use" means a use or portion of a use, which is not intrinsically
dependent on a waterfront location but whose economic viability is dependent
upon a waterfront location because:
(a) The use has a functional requirement for a waterfront location such as the
arrival or shipment of materials by water or the need for large quantities of
water; or
(b) The use provides a necessary service supportive of the water-dependent
uses and the proximity of the use to its customers makes its services less
expensive and/or more convenient.
(134) "Weir" means a structure generally built perpendicular to the shoreline for the
purpose of diverting water or trapping sediment or other moving objects
transported by water.
Page 233 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 44
(135) "Wetlands" are areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater
at a frequency and duration sufficient to support and that under normal
circumstances do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in
saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs,
and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally
created from non-wetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and
drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater
treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands
created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the
construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial
wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland areas to mitigate the
conversion of wetlands.
(136) "Wetland categories:"
(a) Category I. Wetlands are: 1) alkali wetlands; 2) wetlands that are
identified by scientists of the Washington Natural Heritage
Program/WDNR as high quality wetlands; 3) bogs; 4) mature and
old growth forested wetlands over 1/4 acre with slow-growing trees;
5) forests with stands of aspen; and 6) wetlands that perform many
functions very well.
(b) Category II. These wetlands are those that: 1) forested wetlands in the
floodplains of rivers; 2) mature and old-growth forested wetlands over
1/4 acre with fast-growing trees; 3) vernal pools; and 4) wetlands that
perform functions well. These wetlands are difficult, though not
impossible, to replace, and provide high levels of some functions.
(c) Category III. 1) Forested wetlands in the floodplains of rivers; 2) mature
and old-growth forested wetlands over 1/4 acre with fast-growing trees;
3) vernal pools; and 4) wetlands that perform functions well. These
wetlands are difficult, though not impossible, to replace, and provide high
levels of some functions.
(d) Category IV. Category IV wetlands have the lowest level of functions and
are often heavily disturbed. These are wetlands that could be replaced, and
in some cases improved. However, experience has shown that replacement
cannot be guaranteed in any specific case. These wetlands may provide
some important functions and also need to be protected.
Page 234 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 45
Article II. Environment Designation
29.01.100 Environment Designations
(1) The City has designated shorelines pursuant to RCW 90.58 by defining them,
providing criteria for their identification, and establishing shoreline ecological
functions to be protected. Project proponents are responsible for determining
whether a shoreline exists and is regulated pursuant to this SMP. The SMP
classifies the City’s shoreline into eight shoreline environment designations
consistent with the purpose and designation criteria as follows:
(a) Aquatic
(b) Natural
(c) Urban Conservancy
(d) Public Flood Protection
(e) Recreation
(f) High Intensity – Industrial
(g) High Intensity – Mixed Use
(h) Shoreline Residential
(2) Official Shoreline Maps:
(a) Shoreline area designations are delineated on a map by reach and subreach
(SR), hereby incorporated as a part of this SMP (PMC 29.01.860), shall be
known as the Official Shoreline Map. Maps indicating the extent of
shoreline jurisdiction and shoreline designations are to be used in
conjunction with the most current scientific and technical information
available, field investigations, and on-site surveys to accurately establish
the location and extent of shoreline jurisdiction when a project is
proposed.
(3) Unmapped or Undesignated Shorelines:
(a) All areas meeting the definition of a shoreline of the state or a SSWS,
whether mapped or not, are subject to the provisions of this SMP.
(4) Interpretation of Environment Designation Boundaries:
(a) Whenever existing physical features are inconsistent with boundaries on
the Official Shoreline Map, the Shoreline Administrator shall interpret the
Page 235 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 46
boundaries. Appeals of such interpretations may be filed pursuant to
PMC 29.01.810, Appeals.
(b) All shoreline areas waterward of the OHWM shall be designated Aquatic.
(c) Only one shoreline area designation shall apply to a given shoreland area.
In the case of parallel designations, designations shall be divided along an
identified linear feature. Such linear features shall be clearly noted in the
metadata associated with the Official Shoreline Map.
(d) All areas within shorelines that are not mapped and/or designated are
automatically assigned an Urban Conservancy designation.
(e) Environment designations for shorelines within UGA will be effective
immediately upon annexation of the area into the City limits.
29.01.110 Aquatic
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the Aquatic shoreline designation is to protect, restore, and
manage the unique characteristics and resources of the areas waterward of
the OHWM.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) An Aquatic shoreline designation is assigned to lands and waters
waterward of the OHWM
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(i) New over-water structures should be allowed only for
water-dependent uses, public access, recreation, or ecological
restoration.
(ii) Shoreline uses and modifications should be designed and managed
to prevent degradation of water quality and natural hydrographic
conditions.
(iii) In-water uses should be allowed where impacts can be mitigated to
ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. Permitted
in-water uses must be managed to avoid impacts to shoreline
ecological functions. Unavoidable impacts must be minimized and
mitigated.
Page 236 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 47
(iv) On navigable waters or their beds, all uses and developments
should be located and designed to:
(A) Minimize interference with surface navigation;
(B) Consider impacts to public views; and
(C) Allow for the safe, unobstructed passage of fish and
wildlife, particularly species dependent on migration.
(b) Multiple or shared use of over-water and water-access facilities should be
encouraged to reduce the impacts of shoreline development and increase
effective use of water resources.
(c) Structures and activities permitted should be related in size, form, design,
and intensity of use to those permitted in the immediately adjacent upland
area. The size of new over-water structures should be limited to the
minimum necessary to support the structure's intended use.
(d) Natural light should be allowed to penetrate to the extent necessary to
support fisheries and nearshore aquatic habitat unless other illumination is
required by state or federal agencies.
(e) Shoreline uses, development, activities, and modifications in the Aquatic
shoreline designation requiring use of adjacent landside property should
be in a shoreline designation that allows that use, development, activity, or
modification.
29.01.120 Natural
(All islands, Subreach [SR] 1d)
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the Natural shoreline designation is to protect those
shoreline areas that are relatively free of human influence or that include
intact or minimally degraded shoreline ecological functions less tolerant of
human use. These systems require that only very low-intensity uses be
allowed in order to maintain the ecological functions and ecosystem-wide
processes. Consistent with the policies of the designation, restoration of
degraded shorelines within this environment is appropriate.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) The following criteria should be considered in assigning a Natural
environment designation:
Page 237 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 48
(i) The shoreline ecological functions are substantially intact and have
a high opportunity for preservation and low opportunity for
restoration;
(ii) The shoreline is generally in public or conservancy ownership or
under covenant, easement, or a conservation tax program;
(iii) The shoreline contains little or no development or is planned for
development that would have minimal adverse impacts to
ecological functions or risk to human safety;
(iv) The shoreline has high potential for low-impact, passive, or public
recreation; and
(v) The shoreline is considered to represent ecosystems and geologic
types that have high scientific and educational value.
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to other applicable policies and regulations, the following
management policies shall apply:
(i) Any use beyond existing uses that would substantially degrade
shoreline ecological functions or natural character of the shoreline
area should not be allowed;
(ii) Scientific, historic, cultural, educational research, and low-impact,
passive recreational uses are allowed in addition to existing uses,
while meeting no net loss of ecological function requirements;
(iii) Single-family residential development may be allowed as a
conditional use if the density and intensity of such use is limited as
necessary to protect ecological functions and is consistent with the
purpose of the environment;
(iv) Vegetation should remain undisturbed except for removal of
noxious vegetation and invasive species through ongoing
management activities or as part of a development proposal.
Proposed subdivision or lot line adjustments, new development, or
significant vegetation removal that would reduce the capability of
vegetation to perform normal ecological functions should not be
allowed;
(v) Uses that would deplete physical or biological resources or impair
views to or from the shoreline over time should be prohibited;
(vi) Only physical alterations that serve to support an existing use,
protect a significant or unique physical, biological, or visual
Page 238 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 49
shoreline feature that might otherwise be degraded or destroyed, or
those alterations that are the minimum necessary to support a
permitted use should be allowed; and
(vii) Only the following types of signs should be considered for location
in the shorelines: interpretive; directional; navigational; regulatory;
and public.
29.01.130 Urban Conservancy
(Open-space areas located water ward of the parcel boundaries in the
Columbia River Reach 1, Subreaches (SR) 3a (north portion of Chiawana Park),
3b, 5c (non-levee portion of the wetland near Riverview Park), 6c (portion water
ward of the trail), Reach 7 (Sacajawea Park excluding the boat launch and
recreation area), and SR 8a.)
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the Urban Conservancy environment is to protect and
restore ecological functions of open space, floodplain, and other sensitive
lands where they exist in urban and developed settings, while allowing a
variety of compatible uses
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) The following criteria are used to consider an Urban Conservancy
environment designation:
(i) The shoreline contains open space, floodplain, or other sensitive
areas that should not be more intensively developed;
(ii) The shoreline has riparian vegetation with high to moderate
ecological functions;
(iii) The shoreline has potential for development that is compatible
with ecological restoration; or
(iv) The shoreline is not generally suitable for water-dependent uses,
however, has moderate to high potential for public, water-related,
or water-enjoyment uses where ecological functions can be
maintained or restored.
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
Page 239 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 50
(i) Shoreline uses that preserve the natural character of the area or
promote preservation of open space, floodplain, or sensitive lands
either directly or during the long term should be the primary
allowed uses. Uses that result in restoration of ecological functions
should be allowed if the use is otherwise compatible with the
purpose of the environment and the setting.
(ii) Encourage regulations for shoreline stabilization measures,
vegetation conservation, water quality, and shoreline modifications
to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions;
(iii) Public access and public recreation uses should be allowed
whenever feasible and significant ecological impacts can be
mitigated; or
(iv) Water-oriented uses should be given priority over
non-water-oriented uses. For shoreline areas adjacent to
commercially navigable waters, water-dependent uses should be
given priority.
29.01.140 Public Flood Protection
(Leveed areas along the Columbia River, where limited ecological function and
future development potential exists, and the areas are dedicated for public
recreation as part of the regional trail system.)
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the Public Flood Protection environment designation is to
provide flood protection features while protecting shoreline ecological
functions with limitations imposed by the flood protection features, and
provide recreational opportunities. In addition to existing levees, examples
of uses that are appropriate in a Public Flood Protection shoreline
designation include public access and recreation uses consistent with the
protection of public safety and property by the flood protection features.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) The following criteria are used to consider a Public Flood Protection
environment designation:
(i) The shoreline has low to moderate ecological function with low to
moderate opportunity for preservation or restoration;
(ii) The shoreline is owned and maintained by public agencies;
Page 240 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 51
(iii) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is related
to flood protection, public utility, infrastructure, and low-intensity
recreation, facility rehabilitation, or upgrade modifications;
(iv) The shoreline has limited scientific or educational value or unique
historic or cultural resources values; or
(v) The shoreline has low to moderate potential for public,
water-oriented recreation where ecological functions can be
maintained or restored.
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(i) In regulating uses in the Public Flood Protection environment, first
priority should be given to flood protection and water-dependent
public-facility uses. Second priority should be given to
water-related and water-enjoyment uses that are not in conflict
with the flood protection uses. Non-water-oriented uses are
allowed as part of the operational needs.
(ii) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions as a result of redevelopment, facility
upgrades, and new development. Where applicable, development
shall include environmental enhancement of the shoreline in
accordance with USACE McNary Pool Management Plan and the
City’s SMP Restoration Plan.
(iii) Existing visual and physical public access opportunities shall be
maintained and enhanced where feasible and appropriate, as
consistent with PMC 29.01.260, Public Access.
(iv) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as
appropriate landscape features, screening, and maintenance of
natural vegetative buffers.
29.01.150 Recreation
(Chiawana, Wade, Riverview, Schlagel, and Sacajawea parks, marina, boat launch areas)
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the Recreation environment designation is to provide for
water-oriented recreational uses with some commercial uses to support
recreational uses while protecting existing ecological functions,
Page 241 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 52
conserving existing natural resources, and restoring ecological functions in
areas that have been previously degraded.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) The following criteria are used to consider a Recreation environment
designation:
(i) The shoreline has low to moderate ecological function with low to
moderate opportunity for preservation and restoration.
(ii) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is
recreation-related with potential for additional recreation and
recreation-related commerce or is suitable and planned for
water-oriented uses.
(iii) The shoreline has existing recreation uses or moderate to high
potential for public and private water-oriented recreation where
ecological functions can be maintained or enhanced.
(iv) The shoreline has limited scientific or educational value or unique
historic or cultural resources values.
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(i) In regulating uses in the Recreation environment, first priority
should be given to water-dependent recreational uses. Second
priority should be given to water-related and water-enjoyment
recreational uses. Non-water-oriented uses should not be allowed,
except as part of mixed-use developments with a recreation focus.
(ii) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions as a result of new development. Consistent
with the City's SMP Restoration Plan, new development may be
required, as applicable, to include restoration of shoreline functions
as part of project proposals.
(iii) Where feasible, visual and physical public access should be
required as provided for in PMC 29.01.260, Public Access.
Recreational objectives should be enhanced by combining physical
and visual public access opportunities with other recreational
opportunities where feasible.
(iv) Water-oriented commercial uses should be allowed.
Page 242 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 53
(v) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as
sign-control regulations, appropriate development siting,
screening, and architectural standards, and maintenance of natural
vegetative buffers.
29.01.160 High Intensity – Industrial
(Areas landward of the levee in SR 5b, Port of Pasco, a portion of Osprey Point,
industrial areas on Columbia River SR 6c, and the Snake River SR 8b)
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the High Intensity – Industrial environment designation is
to provide for public and private commercial and industrial uses that need
a shoreline location for operation and are associated with water-oriented
commerce and industry. Examples of uses that are appropriate in a
High Intensity – Industrial shoreline environment include water-oriented
commercial uses, water-supply diversion, transportation, navigation uses,
barge and conveyance facilities, and similar uses. This environment may
also provide for some recreation, while protecting existing ecological
functions and restoring ecological functions in areas that have been
previously degraded.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) Assign a High Intensity – Industrial environment designation to shoreline
areas where:
(i) The shoreline has low to moderate ecological function with low to
moderate opportunity for preservation or restoration.
(ii) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is related
to public utility, infrastructure, industry, or commerce with
potential for additional related development, facility rehabilitation,
or upgrade modifications.
(iii) Existing landward industrial development exists and has potential
for future growth and development.
(iv) The operation of such uses depend on proximity to water,
including high-intensity uses related to industrial production,
conveyance, transportation, or navigation.
(v) The shoreline has limited scientific or educational value or unique
historic or cultural resources values.
(3) Management Policies:
Page 243 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 54
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(i) In regulating uses in the High Intensity – Industrial environment,
first priority should be given to water-dependent commercial and
industrial uses. Second priority should be given to water-related
and water-enjoyment uses that are not in conflict with the
commercial and industrial uses. Non-water-oriented uses are
allowed as part of mixed uses to support the water-oriented uses.
(ii) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions as a result of redevelopment, facility
upgrades, and new development. Where applicable, development
shall include environmental cleanup and restoration of the
shoreline to comply in accordance with any relevant state and
federal law.
(iii) Where feasible and appropriate, visual and physical public access
provisions may be included as consistent with PMC 29.01.260,
Public Access.
(iv) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as
appropriate development siting, screening, and maintenance of
natural vegetative buffers.
29.01.170 High Intensity – Mixed Use
(Port of Pasco Marine Terminal SR 6a and western half of Osprey Point)
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the High Intensity – Mixed Use environment designation
is to provide for water-oriented commercial and retail uses along with
residential uses. Examples of uses that are appropriate in a
High Intensity – Mixed Use shoreline environment include water-oriented
commercial office and retail, residential, transportation, public access, and
similar uses. This environment may also provide for some recreation,
while protecting existing ecological functions and restoring ecological
functions in areas that have been previously degraded.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) Assign a High Intensity – Mixed Use environment designation to shoreline
areas where:
(i) The shoreline has low to moderate ecological function with low to
moderate opportunity for preservation or restoration.
Page 244 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 55
(ii) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is related
to public utility, infrastructure, or commerce with potential for
additional related development, facility rehabilitation, or upgrade
modifications.
(iii) Existing landward development exists and has potential for future
growth and development.
(iv) The operation of such uses depends on proximity to water,
including high-intensity uses related to commerce, transportation,
or navigation.
(v) The shoreline has limited to no scientific, educational, unique
historic, or cultural resources values.
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(i) Development in the High Intensity – Mixed-Use Environment
should be managed so it enhances and maintains the shorelines for
a variety of urban uses.
(ii) In regulating uses in the High Intensity – Mixed Use environment,
first priority should be given to water-dependent commercial uses.
Second priority should be given to water-related and
water-enjoyment uses that are not in conflict with the commercial
uses. Non-water-oriented uses are allowed as part of mixed uses to
support the water-oriented uses. Residential uses should be
allowed on the upper floors of developments as part of mixed uses
to support the water-oriented uses.
(iii) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions as a result of redevelopment, facility
upgrades, and new development. Where applicable, development
shall include environmental cleanup and restoration of the
shoreline to comply in accordance with any relevant state and
federal law.
(iv) Where feasible and appropriate, visual and physical public access
provisions may be included as consistent with PMC 29.01.260,
Public Access.
(v) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as
appropriate development siting, building design, screening, and
maintenance of natural vegetative buffers.
Page 245 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 56
29.01.180 Shoreline Residential
(Residential areas along the Columbia River in Reaches 1 and 2, SRs 4a and 4b,
and portions of SRs 5b and 6b)
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the Shoreline Residential environment designation is to
accommodate primarily residential development and appurtenant
structures, but also allow other types of development consistent with this
section. An additional purpose is to provide appropriate public access and
recreational uses.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) Assign a Shoreline Residential environment designation to shoreline areas
where:
(i) The shoreline has low to moderate ecological function with low to
moderate opportunity for restoration.
(ii) The shoreline contains mostly residential development at urban
densities or in clusters in more rural settings.
(iii) The shoreline has low to moderate potential for low-impact,
passive, or active water-oriented recreation where ecological
functions can be restored.
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(i) Encourage regulations that ensure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions as a result of new development such as
limiting lot coverage, providing adequate setbacks from the
shoreline, promoting vegetation conservation, reducing the need
for shoreline stabilization, and maintaining or improving water
quality.
(ii) The scale and density of new uses and development should be
compatible with the existing residential character of the area.
(iii) Public access and joint (rather than individual) use of recreational
facilities should be promoted.
(iv) Access, utilities, and public services to serve proposed
development within shorelines should be constructed outside
Page 246 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 57
shorelines to the extent feasible and be the minimum necessary to
adequately serve existing needs and planned future development.
(v) Public or private outdoor recreation facilities should be provided
with proposals for subdivision development and encouraged with
all shoreline development, if compatible with the character of the
area. Priority should be given first to water-dependent and then to
water-enjoyment recreation facilities.
(vi) Commercial development should be limited to water-oriented uses.
Non-water-oriented commercial uses should only be allowed as
part of mixed-used developments.
Page 247 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 58
Article III. General Regulations
29.01.200 Shoreline Use and Modification
(1) Regulations:
(a) PMC Table 29.01.200 (2) indicates which shoreline activities, uses,
developments, and modifications may be allowed or are prohibited in
shoreline jurisdiction within each shoreline environment designation.
Activities, uses, developments, and modifications are classified as follows:
(i) “Permitted Uses” require a Shoreline Substantial Development
Permit or a Shoreline Exemption.
(ii) “Conditional Uses” require a Shoreline Special Use Permit per
PMC 29.01.750.
(iii) “Prohibited” activities, uses, developments, and modifications are
not allowed and cannot be permitted through a Variance or
Shoreline Special Use Permit.
(iv) General Regulations (PMC 29.01, Article III) and Shoreline
Modification and Uses Regulations (PMC 29.01, Article IV) shall
be considered for additional limitations.
(b) All uses shall comply with the written provisions and regulations in this
SMP and the shoreline use and modification matrix in PMC 29.01.200 (2).
Where there is a conflict between the chart and the written provisions in
this SMP, the written provisions shall control.
(2) General:
(a) Accessory uses shall be subject to the same shoreline permit process as
their primary use.
(b) Authorized uses and modifications shall be allowed only in shoreline
jurisdictions where the underlying zoning allows for it and subject to the
policies and regulations of this SMP.
(c) A use is considered unclassified when it is not listed in
Table 29.01.200 (2) or in the Shoreline Modification and Uses Regulations
(PMC 29.01, Article IV). Any proposed unclassified use may be
authorized as a conditional use provided that the applicant can
demonstrate consistency with the requirements of this SMP.
(d) If any part of a proposed activity, use, modification, or development is not
eligible for exemption per PMC 18.20.770 (Exemptions from Shoreline
Page 248 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 59
Substantial Development Permits), then a Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit or Shoreline Special Use Permit shall be required for
the entire proposed development project.
(e) When a specific use or modification extends into the Aquatic environment
and an abutting upland environment without clear separation (e.g., private
moorage facility or shoreline stabilization), the most restrictive permit
process shall apply to that use or modification.
(f) Shoreline and critical areas buffers found in PMC 29.01, Article V, apply
to all uses and modifications unless stated otherwise in the regulations.
(g) None of the allowed uses shall be conducted in the floodway in any
environment designation, except as allowed by PMC 29.01.550, Flood
Hazard Areas.
(h) Administrative interpretation of these regulations shall be done according
to PMC 29.01.710 (2).
(3) Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix:
Table 29.01.200 (2): Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix for City of Pasco
A = Allowed with Substantial Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable
Use/Modification Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Resource Uses
Agriculture X X A1 X X X X C
Mining X X C X X C C X
Boating Facilities
Boat launch (motorized boats) A C C A A A A C
Boat launch (non-motorized boats – canoe/kayak) A C A A A A A A
Marina A X C C A A A C
Docks, Piers, Mooring Facilities
Private and shared moorage A X A A A A A A
Public moorage A X A A A A A C
Covered moorage C X X X C C C X
Page 249 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 60
A = Allowed with Substantial Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable
Use/Modification Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Commercial Development
Water-dependent A X A A A A A A
Water-related, water-enjoyment C X C C A A A C
Non-water-oriented C2 X C2 C2 A2 A2 A2 X
Dredging Activities
Dredging A NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Dredge material disposal C X C C C C C C
Dredging and disposal as part of ecological
restoration/enhancement A A A A A A A A
Fill and Excavation
Fill Waterward of OHWM and in floodways3 C C C C C C C C
Other upland fill NA C A A A A A A
Excavation NA C4 C A A A A A
Industrial Uses
Water-dependent A5 X X C X A A X
Water-related, water-enjoyment A5 X X C X A A X
Non-water-oriented X X X C2 X A2 A2 X
In-water Modifications
Breakwater C X C C C C C C
Groins and weirs C X C C C C C C
In-stream structures6 A C4 C4 A4, 6 A3 A C C
Recreational Development
Water-dependent A A7 A7 A A A A A
Water-related, water-enjoyment (trails, accessory
buildings) C C7 A7 A A A A A
Non-water-oriented X X C2 C2 A2 A2 A2 A2
Residential Development X C A X C X A2 A
Research and Monitoring
Water-dependent A A A A A A A A
Water-related, water-enjoyment A A A A A A A A
Non-water-oriented A A A A A A A A
Page 250 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 61
A = Allowed with Substantial Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable
Use/Modification Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Shoreline Habitat and Natural Systems
Enhancement Projects A A A A A A A A
Shoreline Stabilization and Flood Control
Flood Control
Modification of existing flood control facilities
(Dams, Dikes and Levees), including replacement
landward of existing location
A A A A A A A A
New flood control facilities (Dams, Dikes and
Levees) C C8 C C C A A C
Shoreline Stabilization – New
Hard C X C C C A A C
Soft A A A A A A A A
Shoreline Stabilization – Replacement9 A A A A A A A A
Transportation
Highways, arterials, railroads (parallel to OHWM) C X A A A A A A
Secondary/public access roads (parallel to OHWM) X X A A A A A A
Roads perpendicular to the OHWM X C A A A A A A
Bridges (perpendicular to shoreline) C C C A A A A C
Existing bridges, trails, roads, and parking facilities:
improvement or expansion A A A A A A A A
New parking, primary X X X A10 A10 A10 A10 X
New parking, accessory X Takes permit types of primary use
Utilities
Above-ground and underground utilities (parallel and
across shoreline) C C A A A A A A
Notes:
1. Allowed when agricultural uses are passive, such as livestock grazing, harvesting of non-cultivated crops, or
small-scale farms, or when ecological functions are degraded to the point where the land is functionally equivalent
to cultivated land.
2. New uses are allowed as part of mixed use or according to PMC 29.01.340(2) for commercial development,
PMC 29.01.370(2) for industrial development, or as part of an existing use according to Article VI, Existing Uses,
Structures and Lots.
3. Fill and excavation waterward of the OHWM, to support ecological restoration is allowed with a Substantial
Development Permit.
4. Habitat restoration and/or fish habitat enhance purposes only.
Page 251 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 62
5. Allowed as part of upland industrial water-dependent or water-related uses.
6. Construction, practices, and maintenance of facilities necessary for flood protections or Columbia Basin Project
operations and associated water-dependent uses to access, pump, and convey water for project purposes to public
agencies or private water users and as consistent with permit exemptions described in PMC 29.01.770.
7. Low intensity only.
8. Only when no other alternatives are available.
9. Exempt for protective bulkhead common to single-family residences according to PMC 29.01.770 (4) and when
consistent with PMC 29.01.440 (5) and (6).
10. Not allowed within 50 feet of edge of riparian vegetation corridor.
OHWM = ordinary high water mark
29.01.210 Development Standards
(1) Regulations:
(a) To preserve the existing and planned character of the shoreline consistent
with the purposes of the shoreline environment designations, development
standards are provided in the table below. These standards apply to all
uses and modifications unless otherwise indicated. In addition, shoreline
developments shall comply with all other dimensional requirements of the
PMC.
(b) When a development or use is proposed that does not comply with the
dimensional performance standards of this SMP, not otherwise allowed by
administrative reduction or administrative modification, such development
or use can only be authorized by approval of a Shoreline Variance Permit.
(c) No permit shall be issued for any new or expanded building or structure of
more than 35 feet above average grade level on shorelines of the state that
will obstruct the view of a substantial number of residences on areas
adjoining such shorelines, except for the High Intensity environment
designations areas, or where the SMP does not prohibit the same, and then
only when overriding considerations of the public interest will be served.
(2) Shoreline Development Standards Matrix:
Page 252 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 63
Table 29.01.210 (2): Shoreline Development Standards Matrix for City of Pasco
Use/Modification Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Mixed Use High Intensity – Industrial Shoreline Residential Building height1 15 N/A 35 35 35 45 No
limit 35
Building line setback in feet NA 10 - 15
Impervious surface cover –
maximum (%)2 NA 5% 20% 10% 20% 50% 100% 50%
Riparian buffer width
in feet2, 3, 4 NA
Conserve
entire
area
75 50 50 5 50 50
Trail width in feet NA NA
20 feet or as required by Americans with Disabilities
Act regulations. Trails on private properties and not
open for public use shall be up to 5-feet-wide.
Notes:
1. According to 29.01.210 (1)(c)
2. Accompanied by stormwater management measures/facilities, wetland protections and other protections as
applicable
3. Measured from the OHWM or top of bank as applicable.
4. Except where roadway, paved trail, or parking area or other development that has eliminated or constrained
ecological functions encroaches and then to the waterward edge of the facility maintenance area, as applicable
NA = not applicable
29.01.220 Archaeological and Historic Resources
(1) The City will coordinate with tribal, state and federal agencies that maintain
inventories of known significant historic, cultural and archaeological sites, and
work with these agencies in the permit review process in complying with state
and federal regulations and laws to protect sites and areas that have historic,
cultural, and archaeological values. Existing policies also reinforce this action,
as written, so no additional changes planned.
(2) In all developments, whenever an archaeological area or historic site is
discovered by a development in the shoreline area, the developer shall comply
with applicable state and federal laws and regulations.
(3) Developers and property owners shall stop work immediately and notify the
local government, the office of archaeology and historic preservation, and
Page 253 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 64
affected Indian tribes if archaeological resources are uncovered during
excavation.
(4) Permits issued in areas documented to contain archaeological resources shall
require a site inspection or evaluation by a professional archaeologist in
coordination with affected Indian tribes.
29.01.230 Environmental Protection
(1) All project proposals, including those for which a Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit is not required, shall comply with RCW 43.21C, the
Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).
(2) Applicants shall apply the following mitigation sequencing steps in order of
priority to avoid or minimize significant adverse effects and significant
ecological impacts (with (a) being top priority):
(a) Avoid the adverse impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts
of an action;
(b) Minimize adverse impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the
action and its implementation by using appropriate technology or by
taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts;
(c) Rectify the adverse impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the
affected environment to the conditions existing at the time of the initiation
of the project;
(d) Reduce or eliminate the adverse impact over time by preservation and
maintenance operations;
(e) Compensate for the adverse impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing
substitute resources or environments; and
(f) Monitor the adverse impact and the compensation projects and taking
appropriate corrective measures.
(3) Projects that cause significant adverse environmental impacts, as defined in
WAC 197-11-794 and PMC 29.01.080, Definitions, are not allowed unless
mitigated according to PMC 29.01.230 (2), above, to avoid reduction or damage
to ecosystem-wide processes and ecological functions. As part of this analysis,
the applicant shall evaluate whether the project may adversely affect existing
hydrologic connections between streams and wetlands and either modify the
project or mitigate any impacts as needed.
(4) When compensatory measures are appropriate pursuant to the mitigation
priority sequence above, preferential consideration shall be given to measures
that replace the adversely impacted functions directly and in the immediate
Page 254 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 65
vicinity of the adverse impact. However, alternative compensatory mitigation
may be authorized within the affected drainage area or watershed that addresses
limiting factors or identified critical needs for shoreline resource conservation
based on watershed or resource management plans, including the Shoreline
Restoration Plan, applicable to the area of adverse impact. Authorization of
compensatory mitigation measures may require appropriate safeguards, terms,
or conditions as necessary to ensure no net loss of ecological functions.
29.01.240 Shoreline Vegetation Conservation
(1) Vegetation conservation standards shall not apply retroactively to existing uses
and developments. Vegetation associated with existing structures, uses, and
developments may be maintained within shoreline jurisdiction as stipulated in
the approval documents for the development.
(2) Regulations specifying establishment and management of shoreline buffers are
located in the PMC 29.01, Article V, Critical Areas. Vegetation within shoreline
buffers, other stream buffers, and wetlands and wetland buffers shall be
managed consistent with the PMC 29.01, Article V.
(3) Vegetation outside of shoreline buffers, other stream buffers, and wetlands and
wetland buffers and within shoreline jurisdiction shall be managed according to
this PMC 29.01.230, Environmental Protection, and any other regulations
specific to vegetation management contained in other sections of this SMP.
(4) Vegetation clearing outside of wetlands and wetland and stream buffers shall be
limited to the minimum necessary to accommodate approved shoreline
development that is consistent with all other provisions of this SMP. Mitigation
sequencing per PMC 29.01.230, Environmental Protection, shall be applied so
the design and location of the structure or development minimizes native
vegetation removal.
(5) Removal of noxious weeds and/or invasive species shall be incorporated in
management and mitigation plans, as necessary, to facilitate establishment of a
stable community of native plants.
29.01.250 Water Quality, Stormwater, and Nonpoint Pollution
(1) The location, design, construction, and management of all shoreline uses and
activities shall protect the quality and quantity of surface and groundwater
adjacent to the site.
(2) When applicable, all shoreline development should comply with the
requirements of the latest version of Ecology's Stormwater Management
Manual for Eastern Washington.
(3) Best management practices (BMPs) for control of erosion and sedimentation
shall be implemented for all shoreline development.
Page 255 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 66
(4) Potentially harmful materials, including, but not limited to, oil, chemicals, tires,
or hazardous materials, shall not be allowed to enter any body of water or
wetland, or to be discharged onto the land. Potentially harmful materials shall
be maintained in safe and leak-proof containers.
(5) Within 25 feet of a waterbody, herbicides, fungicides, fertilizers, and pesticides
shall be applied in strict conformance to the manufacturer’s recommendations
and in accordance with relevant state and federal laws. Further, pesticides
subject to the final ruling in Washington Toxics Coalition, et al., v. EPA shall
not be applied within 60 feet for ground applications or within 300 feet for
aerial applications of the subject waterbodies and shall be applied by a qualified
professional in accordance with state and federal law.
(6) New development shall provide stormwater management facilities designed,
constructed, and maintained in accordance with the latest version of the
Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington, including
the use of BMPs. Additionally, new development shall implement low-impact
development techniques where feasible and necessary to fully implement the
core elements of the Surface Water Design Manual.
(7) For development activities with the potential for adverse impacts on water
quality or quantity in a stream or Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area,
a Critical Area Report as prescribed in the PMC 29.01, Article V, Critical
Areas, shall be prepared. Such reports should discuss the project’s potential to
exacerbate water quality parameters, which are impaired, and for which total
maximum daily loads for that pollutant have been established, and prescribe any
necessary mitigation and monitoring.
(8) All materials that may come in contact with water shall be constructed of
materials, such as untreated wood, concrete, and approved plastic composites or
steel, that will not adversely affect water quality or aquatic plants or animals.
Materials used for decking or other structural components shall be approved by
applicable state agencies for contact with water to avoid discharge of pollutants
from wave or boat wake splash, rain, or runoff. Wood treated with creosote,
copper chromium arsenic, or pentachlorophenol is prohibited in shoreline
waterbodies.
29.01.260 Public Access
(1) Applicants required to provide shoreline public access shall provide physical or
visual access, consistent with the City of Pasco’s Public Access Plan and other
agencies’ management plans when applicable, unless specifically exempted in
this section. Examples of physical and visual access are listed below:
(a) Visual Access. Visual public access may consist of view corridors,
viewpoints, or other means of visual approach to public waters.
Page 256 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 67
(b) Physical Access. Physical public access may consist of a dedication of
land or easement and a physical improvement in the form of a walkway,
trail, bikeway, park, boat or canoe and kayak launching ramp, dock area,
view platform, or other area serving as a means of physical approach to
public waters.
(2) Except as provided in PMC 29.01.260 (3) below, new uses shall provide for
safe and convenient public access to and along the shoreline where any of the
following conditions are present:
(a) The development is proposed by a public entity or on public lands;
(b) The nature of the proposed use, activity, or development will likely result
in an increased demand for public access to the shoreline;
(c) The proposed use, activity, or development is not a water-oriented or other
preferred shoreline use, activity, or development under the SMA such as a
non-water-oriented commercial or recreational use;
(d) The proposed use, activity, or development may block or discourage the
use of customary and established public access paths, walkways, trails, or
corridors;
(e) The proposed use, activity, or development will interfere with the public
use, activity, and enjoyment of shoreline areas or waterbodies subject to
the public trust doctrine;
(f) The proposed use, activity, or development includes key areas for public
access recommended in the City’s Public Access Plan and/or
Shoreline Restoration Plan; or
(g) The proposed activity is a publicly financed shoreline erosion-control
measure (when feasible).
(3) An applicant shall not be required to provide public access where one or more
of the following conditions apply, provided such exceptions shall not be used to
prevent implementing the City’s Public Access Plan and other agencies’
management plans. In determining the infeasibility, undesirability, or
incompatibility of public access in a given situation, the City shall consider
alternative methods of providing public access, such as off-site improvements,
viewing platforms, separation of uses through site planning and design, and
restricting hours of public access:
(a) Proposed use, activity, or development only involves the construction of
four or fewer single-family or multi-family dwellings;
Page 257 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 68
(b) Proposed use is within an area where public access is not proposed in the
Public Access Plan, and the use will not increase public access demand or
reduce public access;
(c) Proposed use is an agricultural activity;
(d) The nature of the use, activity, or development or the characteristics of the
site make public access requirements inappropriate due to health, safety
(including consistency with Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design [CPTED] principles, where applicable), or environmental hazards;
the proponent shall carry the burden of demonstrating by substantial
evidence the existence of unavoidable or unmitigable threats or hazards to
public health, safety, or the environment that would be created or
exacerbated by public access upon the site;
(e) An existing, new, or expanded road or utility crossing through shoreline
jurisdiction shall not create the need for public access if the development
being accessed or served by the road or utility is located outside of
shoreline jurisdiction;
(f) The proposed use, activity, or development has security requirements that
are not feasible to address through the application of alternative design
features for public access such as off-site improvements, viewing
platforms, and separation of uses through site planning and design;
(g) The economic cost of providing for public access at the site is
unreasonably disproportionate to the total long-term economic value of the
proposed use, activity, or development;
(h) Safe and convenient public access already exists in the general vicinity,
and/or the Public Access Plan shows adequate public access at the
property;
(i) Public access has reasonable potential to threaten or harm the natural
functions and native characteristics of the shoreline and/or is deemed
detrimental to threatened or endangered species under the
Endangered Species Act; and
(j) The site is within or part of an overall development, a binding Site Plan, or
a planned unit development, which has previously provided public access
adequate to serve the project in full build-out through other application
processes.
(4) Public access shall be located and designed to respect private property rights, be
compatible with the shoreline environment, protect ecological functions and
processes, protect aesthetic values of shoreline, and provide for public safety
(including consistency with CPTED principles, where applicable).
Page 258 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 69
(5) For any development where public access in not required, shared community
access may be allowed if there is no existing or planned public access along the
shoreline identified in the City’s, and other agencies' plan. Where provided,
community access shall be subject to all applicable development standards of
this section. Shared community access is not required when any of the
conditions under PMC 29.01.260 (3) applies.
(6) General Performance Standards:
(a) Uses, activities, and developments shall not interfere with the regular and
established public use.
(b) Shoreline substantial development or conditional uses shall minimize the
impact on views of shoreline waterbodies from public land or substantial
numbers of residences.
(c) Proponents shall include within their shoreline applications an evaluation
of a proposed use, activity, or development's likely adverse impact on
current public access and future demands for access to the site. Such
evaluation shall consider potential alternatives and mitigation measures to
further the policies of this SMP and the provisions of this section.
(d) Public access easements, trails, walkways, corridors, and other facilities
may encroach upon any buffers or setbacks required in PMC 29.01,
Article V, Critical Areas, or under other provisions of this SMP, provided
that such encroachment does not conflict with other policies and
regulations of this SMP, and no net loss of ecological function can be
achieved. Any encroachment into a buffer or setback must be as close to
the landward edge of the buffer as possible.
(e) Public access facilities shall accommodate persons with disabilities, unless
determined infeasible by the Shoreline Administrator.
(7) Trails and Levees:
(a) Existing improved and primitive public trails shall be maintained and
enhanced.
(b) Shoreline in private ownership should provide public access when feasible
as follows:
(i) Easement for public access; and
(ii) Physical or visual public access when feasible and when
mentioned in the City’s Public Access Plan, or other agencies’
management plan.
Page 259 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 70
(c) Where public access is to be provided by dedication of public access
easements along the OHWM, the minimum width of such easements shall
be 20 feet.
(d) The total width of trail, including shoulders, shall be 20 feet maximum or
as required by Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations.
(e) Pervious pavings are encouraged for all trails and are required for trail
shoulders.
(f) Trails should make use of an existing constructed grade such as those
formed by an abandoned rail grade, road, or utility when feasible.
(g) Trails shall be located, constructed, and maintained so as to avoid, to the
maximum extent possible, removal and other impacts to perennial native
vegetation consistent with a Habitat Management Plan.
(h) Trails on private properties and not open for public use shall be up to
5 feet wide.
(8) Rights-of-way, Easements, and Streets for Public Access:
(a) The City shall maintain public rights-of-ways or easements as a means of
retaining public access on the shoreline. Proposed use, activity, or
developments shall maintain public access provided by public street ends,
public utilities, and rights-of-way.
(b) The public easements required pursuant to this section, for the purpose of
providing access across or through the site to the OHWM, shall be
maintained by the property owner to provide for reasonable and safe
public access to the OHWM.
(9) Where public access routes terminate, connections should be made with the
nearest public street unless determined by the Shoreline Administrator to be
infeasible. Public access facilities required for an approved or permitted use,
activity, or development shall be completed prior to occupancy and use of the
site or operation of the activity. Public access shall make adequate provisions,
such as screening, buffer strips, fences, and signs, to prevent trespass upon
adjacent properties and to protect the value and enjoyment of adjacent or nearby
private properties and natural areas.
(10) Off-site public access may be permitted by the City where it results in an equal
or greater public benefit than on-site public access, or when on-site limitations
of security, environment, compatibility, or feasibility are present. Off-site public
access may include, but is not limited to, adequate access on public lands in
proximity to the site, opportunity to increase public lands and access with
adjoining or proximate public area, enhancing a City-designated public property
(e.g., existing public recreation site, existing public access, road abutting a body
Page 260 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 71
of water, or similar) in accordance with City standards, or other related
measures.
(11) Signage:
(a) Signage to be approved by the Shoreline Administrator shall be
conspicuously installed along public access easements, trails, walkways,
corridors, and other facilities to indicate the public's right of use and the
hours of operation. Public access and interpretive displays may be
provided for publicly funded restoration projects where significant
ecological impacts are addressed. The proponent shall bear the
responsibility for establishing and maintaining signs.
(b) The Shoreline Administrator may require the proponent to post signage
restricting or controlling the public’s access to specific shoreline areas.
The proponent shall bear the responsibility for establishing and
maintaining such signage.
29.01.270 Flood Hazard Reduction
(1) Development in floodplains shall avoid significantly or cumulatively increasing
flood hazards. Development shall be consistent with this SMP, as well as
applicable guidelines of FEMA and PMC 29.01.550, Flood Hazard Areas, and
PMC 24.20, Provisions for Flood Hazard protection.
(2) Existing structural flood hazard reduction measures, such as levees, may be
repaired and maintained as necessary to protect legal uses on the landward side
of such structures. Increases in height of an existing levee, with any associated
increase in width, that may be needed to prevent a reduction in the authorized
level of protection of existing legal structures and uses shall be considered an
element of repair and maintenance.
(3) Flood hazard reduction measures shall not result in channelization of normal
stream flows, interfere with natural hydraulic processes such as channel
migration, or undermine existing structures or downstream banks.
(4) New development and subdivisions. Approve new development or subdivisions
when it can be reasonably foreseeable that the development or use would not
require structural flood hazard reduction measures within floodway during the
life of the development or use consistent with the following
(WAC 173-26-221(3)(c)(i)):
(a) Floodway:
(b) New development and subdivisions shall be subject to applicable
floodway regulations in PMC 29.01.550, Flood Hazard Areas, and PMC
24.20, Provisions for Flood Hazard protection.
Page 261 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 72
(5) New public and private structural flood hazard reduction measures shall be
approved when a scientific and engineering analysis demonstrates the
following:
(a) They are necessary to protect existing development;
(b) Non-structural measures such as setbacks, land use controls, wetland
restoration, dike removal, use or structure removal or relocation,
biotechnical measures, and stormwater management programs are not
feasible;
(c) Adverse impacts on ecological functions and priority species and habitats
can be successfully mitigated so as to ensure no net loss; and
(d) Appropriate vegetation conservation actions are undertaken consistent
with PMC 29.01.240, Shoreline Vegetation Conservation.
(6) Flood hazard reduction measures shall be placed landward of associated
wetlands and designated shoreline buffers, except for actions that increase
ecological functions, such as wetland restoration, or when no other alternative
location to reduce flood hazard to existing development is feasible as
determined by the Shoreline Administrator.
(7) New public structural flood hazard reduction measures, such as levees, shall
dedicate and improve public access pathways, unless public access
improvements would cause unavoidable health or safety hazards to the public,
inherent and unavoidable security problems, unacceptable and unmitigable
significant adverse ecological impacts, unavoidable conflict with the proposed
use, or a cost that is disproportionate and unreasonable to the total long-term
cost of the development.
(8) In those instances when management of vegetation as required by this SMP
conflicts with vegetation provisions included in state, federal, or other flood
hazard agency documents governing City-authorized, legal flood hazard
reduction measures, the vegetation requirements of this SMP will not apply.
However, the applicant shall submit documentation of these conflicting
provisions with any shoreline permit applications and shall comply with all
other provisions of this section and this SMP that are not strictly prohibited by
the approving flood hazard agency.
(9) The removal of gravel or other riverbed material for flood-management
purposes shall be consistent with the PMC 29.01.350, Dredging and Dredge
Material Disposal, and PMC 29.01.390, Mining, and be allowed only after a
biological and physical conditions study shows extraction has no effect on or
provides a long-term benefit to flood hazard reduction, and does not result in a
net loss of ecological functions.
Page 262 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 73
(10) Roads shall be located outside the floodway, except necessary crossings, which
shall be placed perpendicular to the waterbody as much as is physically feasible.
New transportation facilities shall be designed so the effective base flood
storage volume of the floodplain is not reduced. The applicant shall provide all
necessary studies, reports, and engineering analyses, which shall be subject to
review and modification by the Shoreline Administrator. If proposed
transportation facilities effectively provide flood control, they shall comply with
policies and regulations of this section.
Page 263 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 74
Article IV. Shoreline Modifications and Use Regulations
29.01.300 Agriculture
(1) The SMP shall not require modification of or limit existing agricultural
activities occurring on agricultural lands consistent with RCW 90.58.065.
(2) For shoreline areas used for agriculture, new uses, activities, and development
that are not existing and ongoing, agriculture shall be subject to the following
requirements:
(a) Such uses, activities, and development shall be allowed or permitted in a
manner to ensure maintenance of ecological functions and be consistent
with the City’s land use plan.
(b) If the new use, activity, or development is more intensive than the existing
land use, no significant vegetation removal, development, or grading shall
occur in the shoreline buffer without associated mitigation, except as
necessary to accommodate low-intensity, water-dependent uses and public
access that sustains ecological functions.
(c) New agricultural lands created by diking, draining, or filling wetlands
shall not be allowed.
(d) Conversion of land for new agricultural use or activities that are not
consistent with the PMC Title 25, Zoning, shall not be allowed.
(3) A Substantial Development Permit shall be required for all agricultural
developments not specifically exempted by the provisions of
PMC 29.01.770 (4)(e) except for agricultural developments in
Shoreline Residential environment designation where a Shoreline Special Use
Permit shall be required.
(4) SMP provisions shall apply in the following cases:
(a) New agricultural activities on land not meeting the definition of
agricultural land;
(b) Expansion of agricultural activities on non-agricultural lands;
(c) Conversion of agricultural lands to other uses;
(d) Other development on agricultural land that does not meet the definition
of agricultural activities; and
(e) Agricultural development and uses not specifically exempted by the SMA.
Page 264 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 75
(5) New non-agricultural activities proposed on agricultural lands shall be
consistent with the environment designation and the Shoreline Use and
Modification Matrix table (PMC 29.01.200 (2)), as well as other applicable
shoreline use standards, including Commercial (PMC 29.01.340) or Residential
(PMC 29.01.420).
(6) Agricultural uses and development shall be located and designed to ensure no
net loss of ecological functions and no significant adverse impact on other
shoreline resources and values.
(7) New feedlots are prohibited in shoreline areas.
(8) Agricultural uses and activities shall prevent and control erosion of soils and
bank materials within shoreline areas. They shall minimize siltation, turbidity,
pollution, and other environmental degradation of watercourses and wetlands.
(9) Agricultural chemicals shall be applied in a manner consistent with BMPs for
agriculture and PMC 29.01.250 (5).
(10) New agricultural activities shall not remove existing native or non-native
vegetation, except for noxious and invasive vegetation, between all cropland or
pasture areas and adjacent waters or wetlands pursuant to the critical areas
provisions of this SMP.
(11) Agricultural development shall conform to applicable state and federal policies
and regulations.
29.01.320 Boating Facilities
(1) General Requirements:
(a) All boating uses, development, and facilities shall protect the rights of
navigation.
(b) Boating facilities shall be sited and designed to ensure no net loss of
shoreline ecological functions and shall meet Washington State
Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) requirements and other state
guidance if located in or over state-owned aquatic lands.
(c) Boating facilities shall be located on stable shorelines in areas where:
(i) Such facilities will not adversely affect flood channel capacity or
otherwise create a flood hazard;
(ii) Water depths are adequate to minimize spoil disposal, filling,
beach enhancement, and other channel maintenance activities; and
Page 265 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 76
(iii) Water depths are adequate to prevent the structure from grounding
out at the lowest low water or stoppers are installed to prevent
grounding out.
(d) Boating facilities shall not be located:
(i) Where new dredging will be required; or
(ii) Where wave action caused by boating use would increase bank
erosion rates, unless no-wake zones are implemented at the
facility.
(e) Boating uses and facilities shall be located far enough from public
swimming beaches and aquaculture harvest areas to alleviate any aesthetic
or adverse impacts, safety concerns, and potential use conflicts.
(f) In-water work shall be scheduled to protect biological productivity
(including, but not limited to, fish runs, spawning, and benthic
productivity).
(g) Accessory uses at boating facilities shall be:
(i) Limited to water-oriented uses, including uses that provide
physical or visual shoreline access for substantial numbers of the
general public; and
(ii) Located as far landward as possible, while still serving their
intended purposes.
(h) Parking and storage areas shall be landscaped or screened to provide
visual and noise buffering between adjacent dissimilar uses or scenic
areas.
(i) Boating facilities shall locate where access roads are adequate to handle
the traffic generated by the facility and shall be designed so that lawfully
existing or planned public shoreline access is not unnecessarily blocked,
obstructed, or made dangerous.
(j) Joint-use moorage with 10 or more berths is regulated under this section as
a marina (Section 3 below). Joint-use moorage with fewer than 10 berths
is regulated under this section as a dock or pier (see PMC 29.01.400, Piers
and Docks).
(k) All marinas and public launch facilities shall provide at least portable
restroom facilities for boaters’ use that are clean, well-lit, safe, and
convenient for public use.
Page 266 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 77
(l) Installation of boat waste disposal facilities, such as pump-outs and
portable dump stations, shall be required at all marinas and shall be
provided at public boat launches to the extent possible. The locations of
such facilities shall be considered on an individual basis in consultation
with the Washington State Department of Health, Ecology, WDNR,
Washington State Parks, and WDFW, as necessary.
(m) All utilities shall be placed at or below dock levels or below ground, as
appropriate.
(n) When appropriate, marinas and boat launch facilities shall install public
safety signs that include the locations of fueling facilities, pump-out
facilities, and locations for proper waste disposal.
(o) Boating facilities shall be constructed of materials that will not adversely
affect water quality or aquatic plants and animals over the long term.
Materials used for submerged portions, decking, and other components
that may come in contact with water shall be approved by applicable state
agencies for use in water to avoid discharge of pollutants from wave
splash, rain, or runoff. Wood treated with creosote, copper chromium,
arsenic, pentachlorophenol, or other similarly toxic materials is prohibited
for use in moorage facilities.
(p) Boating facilities in waters providing a public drinking water supply shall
be constructed of untreated materials such as untreated wood, approved
plastic composites, concrete, or steel (see PMC 29.01. 250, Water Quality,
Stormwater, and Nonpoint Pollution).
(q) Vessels shall be restricted from extended mooring on waters of the state,
except as allowed by state regulations and provided that a lease or
permission is obtained from the state and impacts to navigation and public
access are mitigated.
(2) Boat Launch Facilities:
(a) Public boat launch facilities may be allowed in areas where no launching
opportunities exist within close proximity of a site (within less than
3 miles distance by road on a waterbody) or as mentioned in the Public
Access Plan.
(b) Boat launch and haul-out facilities, such as ramps, marine travel lifts and
marine railways, and minor accessory buildings, shall be designed and
constructed in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on fluvial
processes, biological functions, aquatic and riparian habitats, water
quality, navigation, and neighboring uses.
Page 267 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 78
(c) Boat launch facilities shall be designed and constructed using
methods/technology that have been recognized and approved by state and
federal resource agencies as the best currently available.
(3) Marinas:
(a) Marinas shall be designed to:
(i) Provide flushing of all enclosed water areas;
(ii) Allow the free movement of aquatic life in shallow water areas;
and
(iii) Avoid and minimize any interference with geohydraulic processes
and disruption of existing shore forms.
(b) Open pile or floating breakwater designs shall be used unless it can be
demonstrated that riprap or other solid construction would not result in
any greater net impacts to shoreline ecological functions, processes, fish
passage, or shore features.
(c) Wet-moorage marinas shall locate a safe distance from domestic sewage
or industrial waste outfalls.
(d) To the maximum extent possible, marinas and accessory uses shall share
parking facilities.
(e) New marina development shall provide public access amenities such as
viewpoints, interpretive displays, and public access to accessory
water-enjoyment uses (e.g., restaurants).
(f) If a marina is to include gas and oil handling facilities, such facilities shall
be separate from main centers of activity in order to minimize the fire and
water pollution hazards and to facilitate fire and pollution control. Marinas
shall have adequate facilities and procedures for fuel handling and storage,
and the containment, recovery, and mitigation of spilled petroleum,
sewage, and other potentially harmful or hazardous materials and toxic
products.
(g) The marina operator shall be responsible for the collection and dumping of
sewage, solid waste, and petroleum waste.
29.01.330 Breakwater, Jetties, Groins, and Weirs
(1) Breakwaters shall be allowed in environments defined in PMC 29.01.200 (2),
Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix, with a Shoreline Special Use Permit.
Page 268 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 79
(2) New, expanded, or replacement groins and weirs shall only be permitted if the
applicant demonstrates that the proposed groin or weir will not result in a net
loss of shoreline ecological functions and the structure is necessary for
water-dependent uses, public access, shoreline stabilization, or other specific
public purposes.
(3) Groins and weirs shall require a Special Use Permit, except when such
structures are installed to protect or restore ecological functions such as
installation of groins that may eliminate or minimize the need for hard shoreline
stabilization.
(4) Groins and weirs shall be located, designed, constructed, and operated
consistent with mitigation sequencing principles, including avoiding critical
areas, as provided in PMC 29.01.230, Environmental Protection.
29.01.340 Commercial Development
(1) Water-dependent commercial development shall be given priority over
non-water-dependent commercial uses within shoreline environments.
Secondarily, water-related and water-oriented uses shall be given priority over
non-water-oriented commercial uses.
(2) Non-water-oriented commercial uses shall be allowed if they can demonstrate at
least one or more of the following:
(a) The commercial use is part of a mixed-use project that includes
water-dependent uses and provides a significant public benefit with
respect to the objectives of the SMA.
(b) Navigability is severely limited at the proposed site, including
opportunities for non-motorized boating or other water-oriented uses.
(c) The commercial use is physically separated from the shoreline by another
property, public right-of-way, or levee.
(d) The commercial use is farther upland than 200 feet from the OHWM;
therefore, a water-oriented use is not a viable option.
(3) Non-water-oriented uses, including, but not limited to, residential uses, may be
located with water-oriented commercial uses provided:
(a) The mixed-use project includes one or more water-dependent uses.
(b) Water-dependent commercial uses, as well as other water-oriented
commercial uses, have preferential locations along the shoreline.
(c) The underlying zoning district permits residential uses together with
commercial uses.
Page 269 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 80
(d) Public access is provided and/or ecological restoration is provided as a
public benefit.
(4) Review Criteria. The City shall utilize the following information in its review of
all commercial development applications:
(a) Whether there is a water-oriented aspect of the proposed commercial use
or activity when it is located within 200 feet of the OHWM;
(b) Whether the proposed commercial use is consistent with the Shoreline Use
and Modification Matrix (PMC 29.01.200 (2));
(c) Whether the application has the ability to enhance compatibility with the
shoreline environment and adjacent uses;
(d) Whether adequate provisions are made for public and private visual and
physical shoreline access; and
(e) Whether the application makes adequate provisions to prevent adverse
environmental impacts and provide for shoreline ecological or critical area
mitigation, where appropriate.
(5) Commercial development shall be designed and maintained in a manner
compatible with the character and features of surrounding areas. Developments
are encouraged to incorporate low-impact development techniques into new and
existing projects and integrate architectural and landscape elements that
recognize the river and lake environments. The City may prescribe and modify
project dimensions, screening standards, setbacks, or operation intensities to
achieve this purpose.
(6) Eating and drinking facilities and lodging facilities shall be oriented to provide
views to the waterfront, when such view is available from the site.
(7) Commercial uses shall provide for public access as a condition of approval,
unless such public access is demonstrated by the proponent to be infeasible or
inappropriate for the shoreline pursuant to PMC 29.01.260, Public Access.
(8) Commercial uses shall provide for suitable measures to rehabilitate and enhance
the shoreline ecology as a condition of approval.
(9) Non-water-oriented commercial uses shall not be allowed over water in any
shoreline environment.
(10) All commercial loading and service areas shall be located upland or away from
the shoreline. Provisions shall be made to screen such areas with walls, fences,
and landscaping and to minimize aesthetic impacts.
Page 270 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 81
(11) The storage of potentially hazardous or dangerous substances or wastes is
prohibited in the floodway or within 200 feet of the OHWM, whichever
boundary extends farthest landward.
(12) Development shall be located, designed, and constructed in a manner that
ensures no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and without significant
adverse impacts on other preferred land uses and public access features.
29.01.350 Dredging and Dredge Material Disposal
(1) Dredging:
(a) New dredging shall be permitted only where it is demonstrated that the
proposed water-dependent or water-related uses will not result in
significant or ongoing adverse impacts to water quality, Fish and Wildlife
Habitat Conservation Areas and other critical areas, flood holding
capacity, natural drainage and water circulation patterns, significant plant
communities, prime agricultural land, and public access to shorelines,
unless one or more of these impacts cannot be avoided. When such
impacts are unavoidable, they shall be minimized and mitigated such that
they result in no net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
(b) Dredging and dredge disposal shall be prohibited on or in archaeological
sites that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places and the
Washington Heritage Register until such time that they have been
reviewed and approved by the appropriate agency.
(c) Dredging techniques that cause minimum dispersal and broadcast of
bottom material shall be used, and only the amount of dredging necessary
shall be permitted.
(d) Dredging shall be permitted only:
(i) For navigation or navigational access;
(ii) In conjunction with a water-dependent use of waterbodies or
adjacent shoreline areas;
(iii) As part of an approved habitat improvement project;
(iv) To improve water flow or water quality, provided that all dredged
material shall be contained and managed so as to prevent it from
re-entering the water; or
(v) In conjunction with a bridge, navigational structure, or wastewater
treatment facility for which there is a documented public need and
where other feasible sites or routes do not exist.
Page 271 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 82
(e) Dredging for fill is prohibited except where the material is necessary for
restoration of shoreline ecological functions.
(2) Dredge Material Disposal:
(a) Upland dredge material disposal within shoreline jurisdiction is
discouraged. In the limited circumstances when it is allowed, it will be
permitted under the following conditions:
(i) Shoreline ecological functions and processes will be preserved,
restored, or enhanced, including protection of surface and
groundwater;
(ii) Erosion, sedimentation, floodwaters, or runoff will not increase
adverse impacts on shoreline ecological functions and processes or
property; and
(iii) The site will ultimately be suitable for a use allowed by this SMP.
(b) Dredge material disposal shall not occur in wetlands, except as authorized
by Special Use Permit as part of a shoreline restoration project.
(c) Dredge material disposal within areas assigned an Aquatic environment
designation may be approved only when authorized by applicable
agencies, which may include the USACE pursuant to Section 404
(Clean Water Act) permits, WDFW’s Hydraulic Project Approval, and/or
the Dredged Material Management Program of the WDNR; and when one
of the following conditions apply:
(i) Land disposal is infeasible, less consistent with this SMP, or
prohibited by law; or
(ii) Disposal as part of a program to restore or enhance shoreline
ecological functions and processes is not feasible.
(d) Dredge materials approved for disposal within areas assigned an Aquatic
environment designation shall comply with the following conditions:
(i) Aquatic habitat will be protected, restored, or enhanced;
(ii) Adverse effects on water quality or biologic resources from
contaminated materials will be mitigated;
(iii) Shifting and dispersal of dredge material will be minimal; and
(iv) Water quality will not be adversely affected.
Page 272 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 83
(e) When required by the Shoreline Administrator, revegetation of land
disposal sites shall occur as soon as feasible in order to retard wind and
water erosion and to restore the wildlife habitat value of the site. Native
species shall be used in the revegetation.
(f) Dredge material disposal operating periods and hours shall be limited to
those stipulated by the WDFW and hours from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM
Monday through Friday, except in time of emergency as authorized by the
Shoreline Administrator. Provisions for buffers at land disposal or transfer
sites, in order to protect public safety and other lawful interests and to
avoid adverse impacts, shall be required.
(3) Submittal Requirements. The following information shall be required for all
dredging applications:
(a) A description of the purpose of the proposed dredging and analysis of
compliance with the policies and regulations of this SMP.
(b) A detailed description of the existing physical character, shoreline
geomorphology, and biological resources provided by the area proposed to
be dredged, including:
(i) A site plan map outlining the perimeter of the proposed dredge
area, including the existing bathymetry (water depths that indicate
the topography of areas below the OHWM), and having data points
at a minimum of 2-foot depth increments.
(ii) A Critical Areas Detailed Studies according to
PMC 29.01.510 (10).
(iii) A mitigation plan, if necessary, to address any identified adverse
impacts on ecological functions or processes.
(iv) Information on stability of areas adjacent to proposed dredging and
spoils disposal areas.
(v) A detailed description of the physical, chemical, and biological
characteristics of the dredge materials to be removed, including:
(A) Physical analysis of material to be dredged (e.g., material
composition and amount, grain size, organic materials
present, and source of material).
(B) Chemical analysis of material to be dredged (e.g., volatile
solids, chemical oxygen demand, grease and oil content,
and mercury, lead, and zinc content).
(C) Biological analysis of material to be dredged.
Page 273 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 84
(c) A description of the method of materials removal, including facilities for
settlement and movement.
(d) Dredging procedure, including the length of time it will take to complete
dredging, method of dredging, and amount of materials removed.
(e) Frequency and quantity of project maintenance dredging.
(f) Detailed plans for dredge spoil disposal, including specific land disposal
sites and relevant information on the disposal site, including, but not
limited to:
(i) Dredge material disposal area;
(ii) Physical characteristics, including location, topography, existing
drainage patterns, and surface and ground water;
(iii) Size and capacity of disposal site;
(iv) Means of transportation to the disposal site;
(v) Proposed dewatering and stabilization of dredged material;
(vi) Methods of controlling erosion and sedimentation; and
(vii) Future use of the site and conformance with land use policies and
regulations.
(g) Total estimated initial dredge volume.
(h) Plan for disposal of maintenance spoils for at least a 20-year period, if
applicable.
(i) Hydraulic modeling studies sufficient to identify existing geohydraulic
patterns and probable effects of dredging.
29.01.360 Fill and Excavation
(1) Fill and excavation waterward of the OHWM, except to support ecological
restoration, requires a Special Use Permit and may be permitted only when:
(a) In conjunction with water-dependent or public access uses allowed by this
SMP;
(b) In conjunction with a bridge, levee, or transportation facility of statewide
significance, for which there is a demonstrated public need and where no
feasible upland sites, design solutions, or routes exist;
Page 274 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 85
(c) In conjunction with implementation of an interagency environmental
cleanup plan to clean up and dispose of contaminated sediments;
(d) Disposal of dredged material considered suitable under, and conducted in
accordance with, the Washington State Dredged Material Management
Program; or
(e) In conjunction with any other environmental restoration or enhancement
project.
(2) Waterward of the OHWM, pile or pier supports shall be utilized whenever
feasible in preference to fills. Fills for approved road development in floodways
or wetlands shall be permitted only if pile or pier supports are proven not
feasible.
(3) Fill upland and waterward of the OHWM, including in non-watered side
channels, shall be permitted only where it is demonstrated that the proposed
action will not:
(a) Result in significant ecological damage to water quality, fish, and/or
wildlife habitat;
(b) Adversely alter natural drainage and circulation patterns, currents, or river
flows, or significantly reduce flood water capacities;
(c) Alter geomorphic or hydrologic processes; and
(d) Significantly reduce public access to the shoreline or significantly
interfere with shoreline recreational uses.
(4) Fills are prohibited in the floodway, except when approved by Special Use
Permit and where required in conjunction with uses allowed by this SMP.
(5) Fills are allowed in floodplains outside of the floodway only where they would
not alter the hydrologic characteristics or flood storage capacity, or inhibit
channel migration that would, in turn, increase flood hazard or other damage to
life or property and are consistent with FEMA standards and PMC 24.20,
Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection, and PMC 29.01.550, Flood Hazard
Areas.
(6) Fill shall be of the minimum amount and extent necessary to accomplish the
purpose of the fill.
(7) Excavation waterward of the OHWM or within wetlands shall be considered
dredging for purposes of this SMP.
Page 275 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 86
(8) Fills or excavation shall not be located where shore stabilization will be
necessary to protect materials placed or removed. Disturbed areas shall be
immediately stabilized and revegetated, as applicable.
(9) Fills, beach development or nourishment, and excavation shall be designed to
blend physically and visually with existing topography whenever possible, so as
not to interfere with long-term appropriate use, including lawful access and
enjoyment of scenery.
29.01.370 Industrial Development
(1) Water-dependent industrial development shall be given priority over
non-water-dependent commercial uses within shoreline environments.
Secondarily, water-related and water-oriented uses shall be given priority over
non-water-oriented commercial uses.
(2) Non-water-oriented industrial uses shall be allowed if they can demonstrate one
or more of the following:
(a) The industrial use is part of a mixed-use project that includes
water-dependent uses and provides a significant public benefit with
respect to the objectives of the SMA.
(b) Navigability is severely limited at the proposed site, including
opportunities for non-motorized boating or other water-oriented uses.
(c) The industrial use is physically separated from the shoreline by another
property, public right-of-way, or levee.
(d) The industrial use is farther upland than 200 feet from the OHWM;
therefore, a water-oriented use is not a viable option.
(3) Where industrial use is proposed for location on land in public ownership,
public access should be required unless such public access is demonstrated by
the proponent to be infeasible or inappropriate for the shoreline pursuant to
PMC 29.01.260, Public Access.
(4) Industrial uses shall provide for suitable measures to rehabilitate and enhance
the shoreline ecology as a condition of approval.
(5) Non-water-oriented industrial uses shall not be allowed over water in any
shoreline environment.
(6) All industrial loading and service areas shall be located upland or away from the
shoreline, except when loading services are water-dependent such as barge
facilities. Provisions shall be made to screen upland loading areas with walls,
fences, and landscaping and to minimize aesthetic impacts.
Page 276 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 87
(7) The new storage of potentially hazardous or dangerous substances or wastes is
prohibited in the floodway or within 200 feet of the OHWM, whichever
boundary extends farthest landward.
(8) Industrial development will be located, designed, or constructed in a manner
that ensures no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and such that it does
not have significant adverse impacts to other shoreline resources and values.
29.01.380 In-stream Structures
(1) In -stream structures are those structures placed by humans within a stream or
river waterward of the OHWM that either cause or have the potential to cause
water impoundment or the diversion, obstruction, or modification of water flow.
In -stream structures may include those for hydroelectric generation, irrigation,
water supply, flood control, transportation, utility service transmission,
structures primarily intended for fisheries management, or other purposes.
Docks, piers, and marinas are not regulated as in-stream structures in this
section of the SMP. See PMC 29.01.450, Transportation: Trails, Roads, and
Parking, and PMC 29.01.460, Utilities, for regulations governing road and
utility crossings of streams.
(2) General:
(a) The location, planning, and design of in-stream structures shall be
compatible with the following:
(i) The full range of public interests; existing agricultural activities;
water diversion operations, maintenance, and facility upgrade
activities; and providing for public access to shoreline waters,
desire for protection from floods, and need for preservation of
historic and cultural resources.
(ii) Protection and preservation of ecosystem-wide processes and
ecological functions, including, but not limited to, fish and
wildlife, with special emphasis on protecting and restoring priority
habitats and species and water resources and hydrogeological
processes within the context of the hydrology and water
management effects of the Columbia and Snake River operations
and McNary Pool conditions, as applicable.
(b) New structures shall be designed, located, and constructed consistent with
mitigation sequencing principles in PMC 29.01.230, Environmental
Protection, and as otherwise limited by floodplain regulations found in
PMC 29.01.270, Flood Hazard Reduction, and PMC 29.01.550, Flood
Hazard Areas.
Page 277 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 88
(c) New structures shall be designed and located to minimize removal of
riparian vegetation and, if applicable, to return flow to the stream in as
short a distance as possible.
(d) In-stream structures shall provide for adequate upstream and downstream
migration of resident fish, as applicable, and shall not adversely affect
salmonid fish species or adversely modify salmonid fish habitat, as
applicable.
(e) Utilities and transmission lines shall be located so as to minimize
obstruction or degradation of views and comply with applicable provisions
of the Utilities section of this SMP.
(f) Mitigation shall be required of the proponent for the loss of ecological
functions and processes pursuant to PMC 29.01.230, Environmental
Protection, and PMC 29.01, Article V, Critical Areas. No net loss in
function, value, or acreage shall occur from such development.
(3) Submittal Requirements. In addition to the standard requirements listed in
PMC 29.01.730, Application Requirements, all permit applications for in-
stream structures shall contain, at a minimum, the following additional
information:
(a) A site suitability analysis, which provides sufficient justification for the
proposed site; the analysis must fully address alternative sites for the
proposed development.
(b) Proposed location and design of primary and accessory structures,
transmission equipment, utility corridors, and access/service roads.
(c) A plan that describes the extent and location of vegetation, which is
proposed to be removed to accommodate the proposed facility, and any
site revegetation plans required by this SMP.
(d) A hydraulic analysis prepared by a licensed professional engineer that
sufficiently describes the project’s effects on streamway hydraulics,
including potential increases in base flood elevation, changes in stream
velocity, and the potential for redirection of the normal flow of the
affected stream.
(e) A hydrologic analysis that analyzes the project’s effects on ecological
processes, including delivery and rate of water and sediment,
geomorphology, and recruitment of organic material.
(f) Biological resource inventory and analysis that sufficiently describes the
project’s effects on fish and wildlife resources, prepared by a qualified
professional as defined in the Critical Areas section of this SMP.
Page 278 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 89
(g) Provision for erosion control, protection of water quality, and protection of
fish and wildlife resources during construction.
(h) Long-term management plans that describe in sufficient detail the
provisions for protection of in-stream resources during construction and
operation; the plan shall include means for monitoring its success.
29.01.390 Mining
(1) Mining shall be prohibited waterward of the OHWM.
(2) Mining facilities shall be located within shoreline jurisdiction only when no
feasible sites are available outside shoreline jurisdiction and only after the
applicant has demonstrated compliance with the mitigation sequencing
requirements of PMC 29.01.230, Environmental Protection.
(3) Mining in shoreline jurisdiction shall only be approved when the material
proposed to be extracted is only available in a shoreline location. This
determination shall be based on an evaluation of geologic factors such as the
distribution and availability of mineral resources for that jurisdiction, the need
for such mineral resources, and economic, transportation, and land use factors.
This demonstration may rely on analysis or studies prepared for purposes of the
Comprehensive Plan’s designations and may be integrated with any relevant
environmental review conducted under (SEPA; RCW 43.21C) or otherwise be
shown in a manner consistent with RCW 90.58.100(1) and
WAC 173-26-201(2)(a), as amended.
(4) Mining facilities and associated activities shall be designed and located to
prevent loss of ecological function.
(5) Application for permits for mining operations shall be accompanied by
operation plans, reclamation plans, and analysis of environmental impacts
sufficient to make a determination as to whether the project will result in net
loss of shoreline ecological functions and processes during the course of mining
and after reclamation, and how impacts will be mitigated to achieve no net loss
of these functions. Creation, restoration, or enhancement of habitat for priority
species and the future productivity of the site may be considered in determining
no net loss of ecological functions.
(6) Mining proposals must be coordinated and compliant with state Surface Mining
Reclamation Act requirements (RCW 78.44, WAC 332-18).
(7) Preference shall be given to mining uses that result in the creation, restoration,
or enhancement of habitat for priority species.
Page 279 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 90
29.01.400 Piers and Docks
(1) All boating uses, development, and facilities shall protect the rights of
navigation and demonstrate no net loss of ecological functions, including
providing on-site and off-site mitigation, as applicable.
(2) Shared moorage serving single-family use consisting of docks and piers with
more than four berths, commercial moorage available to the general public, and
moorage related to clubs or other groups not associated with a particular
residential development are regulated as Boating Facilities under PMC
29.01.320, Boating Facilities.
(3) Docks and piers with four or fewer berths or any number of mooring buoys are
regulated under this section.
(4) Piers and docks shall avoid:
(a) Areas where shoreline modification is required for approach and other
upland facilities.
(b) Locations where they would adversely impact upland riparian or nearshore
habitat for aquatic species.
(c) Locations where they would adversely affect flood channel capacity or
create a flood hazard.
(d) Locations where water depths for vessels are not adequate without
dredging.
(5) Piers and docks, except those accessory to single-family residences, shall
provide public access in accordance with PMC 29.01.260, Public Access, of this
SMP and shall be located and designed such that existing public access to public
shorelines is not obstructed nor made hazardous.
(6) All in- and over-water structures shall be constructed of materials that will not
adversely affect water quality or aquatic plants and animals during the long
term. Wood treated with creosote, pentachlorophenol, or other similarly toxic
materials is prohibited. Docks shall be constructed of untreated materials such
as untreated wood, approved plastic composites, concrete, or steel.
(7) Vessels shall be restricted from extended mooring on waters of the state, except
as allowed by state regulations and unless a lease or other permission is
obtained from the state and impacts to navigation and public access are
mitigated.
(8) Boat Launches:
Page 280 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 91
(a) Boat launches accessory to single-family and multi-family residential uses
are prohibited.
(b) Private boat launches shall be allowed only for water-dependent uses and
marinas and only when it is demonstrated that public boat launches will
not feasibly serve the use. Rail and track systems shall be preferred over
concrete ramps.
(c) New public boat launches for general public use or expansion of public
boat launches by adding launch lanes shall demonstrate that:
(i) Water depths are adequate to avoid the need for dredging and
eliminate or minimize potential loss of shoreline ecological
functions or other shoreline resources from offshore or foreshore
channel dredging.
(ii) Adjacent residential properties will not be adversely affected by
adverse proximity impacts such as noise, light and glare, or scale
and aesthetic impacts. Fencing or landscape areas may be required
to provide a visual screen.
(iii) Exterior lighting will not adversely impact aquatic species.
(iv) Adequate provisions are made for restroom, sewage, and solid
waste disposal facilities in compliance with applicable health
regulations.
(v) Access and parking shall not produce traffic hazards, shall not
result in excessive noise or other impacts, shall minimize traffic
impacts on nearby streets, and shall include adequate parking for
boat trailers. Parking on public streets may be allowed for peak
periods if it is demonstrated that such parking will not adversely
impact through traffic or residential uses.
(9) New moorage to serve a single-family residence may be allowed only if:
(a) It is consistent with the USACE McNary Pool Management Plan.
(b) An applicant demonstrates that existing facilities (boat launches and
public and private marinas) are not reasonably available to meet demand.
(c) The lot does not have access to shared moorage in an existing subdivision,
and there is no homeowners association or other corporate entity capable
of developing shared moorage.
(d) In cases where a new dock or pier is approved, the City may require an
agreement to share with nearby residences with water frontage and
provide for expansion to serve such additional users.
Page 281 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 92
(10) A dock or pier serving a single-family residence shall meet the following
standards:
(a) Piers and Ramps:
(i) To prevent damage to shallow-water habitat, piers and ramps shall
extend at least 40 feet perpendicular from the OHWM. In some
instances and sites, it may not be practical to extend a ramp 40 feet
from OHWM (for instance, where this could conflict with
navigation). The City may grant exceptions on a case-by-case basis
depending on documentation of specific limitation that exist and in
coordination with other permitting agencies.
(ii) Piers and ramps shall be no more than 4 feet in width.
(iii) The bottom of either the pier or landward edge of the ramp shall be
elevated at least 2 feet above the plane of OHWM.
(iv) Grating shall cover the entire surface area (100%) of the pier or
ramp. The open area of grating shall be at least 50%, as rated by
the manufacturer.
(v) Skirting shall not be placed on piers, ramps, or floats. Protective
bumper material will be allowed along the outside edge of the
float, as long as the material does not extend below the bottom
edge of the float frame or impede light penetration.
(vi) Shoreline concrete anchors must be placed at least 10 feet
landward from the OHWM and shall be sized no larger than
4-feet-wide by 4-feet-long, unless otherwise approved by the City,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
fisheries, USACE, and WDFW. The maximum anchor height shall
be only what is necessary to elevate the bottom of either the pier or
landward edge of the ramp at least 2 feet above the plane of
OHWM. The intent of this criterion is to limit impacts to riparian
vegetation along the shoreline. The City may grant exceptions
from the 10-foot landward requirement if site conditions warrant.
Exceptions shall be made on a case-by-case basis and based on
documentation of a specific limitation that exists and in
coordination with other permitting agencies.
(b) Preservatives:
(i) The dock shall be built with materials that do not leach
preservatives or other materials.
(ii) No treated wood of any kind shall be used on any overwater
structure (float, pier, or ramp).
Page 282 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 93
(iii) No paint, stain, or preservative shall be applied to the overwater
structure.
(c) General:
(i) No electricity shall be provided to, or on, the overwater structure.
(ii) No boat lifts or watercraft lifts (e.g., Jet Ski lifts) of any type will
be placed on, or in addition to, the overwater structure. The City
may grant exceptions on a case-by-case basis in coordination with
other permitting agencies if the applicant can demonstrate that the
proposed boat lift meets the intent of the criteria to minimize
structure, maximize light penetration, and maximize depth.
However, these structures must meet the size criteria of the plan
(total 160 square feet).
(iii) Shoreline armoring (i.e., bulkheads, riprap, and retaining walls)
shall not occur in association with installation of the overwater
structure.
(iv) Construction of the overwater structure shall be completed during
the in-water work window (November 1 to February 28).
(d) Piling and Float Anchors:
(i) Piling shall not exceed 8 inches in diameter. The intent of this
criterion is not to require existing pilings to be removed, cut, or
capped, but to place limits on the size of new pilings. The City
may grant exceptions to allow for larger pilings on a case-by-case
basis and in coordination with other permitting agencies in areas
where safety considerations merit it.
(ii) Pilings shall be spaced at least 18 feet apart on the same side of
any component of the overwater structure. The pier/ramp and float
are separate components.
(iii) Each overwater structure shall utilize no more than four piles total
for the entire project. A combination of two piles and four helical
anchors may be used in place of four piles.
(iv) All pilings shall be fitted with devices to prevent perching by
piscivorous (fish-eating) birds.
(v) Submerged float anchors will be constructed from concrete and
shall be horizontally compressed in form, by a factor of five or
more, for a minimum profile above the stream bed (the horizontal
length and width will be at least five times the vertical height). A
helical screw anchor may be utilized where substrate allows. The
Page 283 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 94
owner shall be responsible for demonstrating feasibility and for
proper installation such that anchor displacement does not occur.
(vi) No in-water fill material will be allowed, with the exception of
pilings and float anchors. (Note: uncured concrete or its
by-products shall not be allowed.)
(e) Floats:
(i) Float components shall not exceed the dimensions of 8-by-20 feet,
or an aggregate total of 160 square feet, for all float components.
(ii) Flotation materials shall be permanently encapsulated to prevent
breakup into small pieces and dispersal in water (e.g., rectangular
float tubs).
(iii) Grating shall cover 100% of the surface area of the float(s). The
open area of the grating shall be no less than 50%, as rated by the
manufacturer.
(iv) Functional grating will cover no less than 50% of the float.
(v) Floats shall not be located in shallow-water habitat where they
could ground or impede the passage or rearing of any salmonid life
stage.
(vi) Nothing shall be placed on the overwater structure that will reduce
natural light penetration through the structure.
(vii) Floats shall be positioned at least 40 feet horizontally from the
OHWM and no more than 100 feet from the OHWM, as measured
from the landward-most edge of the float. Adjustments to this
requirement may be made on an individual basis where street
compliance with this standard may present safety issues or be
excessive for site conditions.
(viii) Project construction shall cease during high-flow conditions that
could result in inundation of the project area, except for efforts to
avoid or minimize resource damage.
(11) Shared residential docks and piers shall generally meet the standards for
single-family docks above, except that the number of floats and the size of piers
and other facilities may be increased to serve additional slips to provide one
moorage space per residence served.
(12) Docks and piers shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from side property
lines, except that joint-use facilities may be located closer to, or upon, a side
property line when agreed to by contract or covenant with the owners of the
Page 284 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 95
affected properties. This agreement shall be recorded with the County Auditor
and a copy filed with the Shoreline Permit application.
(13) Moorage related to subdivision:
(a) New subdivisions and short plats shall contain a restriction on the face of
the plat prohibiting individual docks. A site for community or shared
moorage shall be designated on the plat and owned in undivided interest
by property owners within the subdivision. Shared moorage facilities shall
be available to lots with water frontage in the subdivision. The over-water
area of the dock shall be made available to other lots and the public for
community access and may be required to provide public access
depending on the scale of the facility.
(b) Approval of a shared moorage for a subdivision shall be subject to the
following criteria:
(i) There is no reasonably available public or private moorage that can
serve the moorage needs of the residences or the subdivision.
(ii) Shared moorage to serve new development shall be limited to the
amount of moorage needed to serve lots with water frontage. One
moorage space per lot may not be presumed.
(iii) The size of a dock must consider the use of mooring buoys for
some or all moorage needs and the use of all or part of the dock to
allow tender access to mooring buoys.
(iv) Public access shall be provided in all shared docks utilizing public
aquatic lands that accommodate five or more vessels.
(c) If a community or shared dock is not developed at the time of subdivision,
a community association shall be established with the authority to levy
assessments within the subdivision to construct and maintain a community
dock in the future. The failure of a subdivision to develop a community or
shared dock shall not affect the prohibition on individual docks.
(14) Multi-family residences, hotels, motels, and other commercial developments
proposing to provide moorage facilities shall meet the criteria for a marina. Use
of the moorage must be open to the general public on the same basis as residents
or occupants and shall provide public access. If approved, no more than one
joint-use moorage facility may be provided for a parcel or development.
(15) Applications for docks or piers serving single commercial or industrial
enterprises shall demonstrate that:
(a) The facility serves a water-dependent use;
Page 285 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 96
(b) The facility is the minimum size required to serve the proposed use,
provided that provisions for expansion or future joint use may be
provided;
(c) The facility minimizes impacts to the extent feasible. Where impacts are
unavoidable, the facility mitigates impacts to navigation, aquatic habitat,
upland habitat, public access to the water for recreation, fishing and
similar use, and public access to publicly accessible lands below the
OHWM.
(16) Commercial or industrial moorage facilities shall demonstrate that:
(a) The dock or pier shall be the minimum length required to serve the use.
(b) Access from the shore to piers or floats shall minimize water cover in
order to minimize impacts to shallow-water habitat.
(c) Piers and ramps shall be elevated to provide the maximum feasible light
penetration.
(d) Grating, or clear translucent material, shall be utilized to the maximum
extent feasible to provide light penetration.
(e) Floats shall be constructed and attached so they do not ground out on the
substrate.
(f) Pile spacing shall be the maximum feasible to minimize shading and avoid
a wall effect that would block or baffle wave patterns, currents, littoral
drift, or movement of aquatic life forms, or result in structure damage
from driftwood impact or entrapment.
(g) Pile diameter shall be minimized while meeting structural requirements.
(h) Covered structures may be permitted only to serve a water-dependent use
where it is demonstrated that adequate upland sites are not feasible and the
area covered is the minimum necessary to serve the use.
(17) Barge terminals are a particular use that can include docks, piers, and industrial
moorage. These facilities must demonstrate those items as provided in
PMC 29.01.100 (16), but the SMP recognizes that barge terminals require
specific development regulations, including hardening of the shoreline,
dredging, and no setback areas.
29.01.410 Recreational Development
(1) General Preferences:
Page 286 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 97
(a) Recreational uses and facilities shall include features that relate to access,
enjoyment, and use of the City’s shorelines.
(b) Both passive and active shoreline recreation uses are allowed.
(c) Water-oriented recreational uses and activities are preferred in shoreline
jurisdiction. Water-dependent recreational uses shall be preferred as a first
priority and water-related and water-enjoyment recreational uses as a
second priority.
(d) Existing passive recreational opportunities, including nature appreciation,
non-motorized trails, public education regarding shoreline ecological
functions and processes, environmental interpretation, and native habitat
protection, shall be maintained. Opportunities incorporating educational
and interpretive information shall be included in design and operation of
recreation facilities and nature trails when feasible.
(e) Preference shall be given to the development and enhancement of public
access to the shoreline to increase water-enjoyment recreational
opportunities.
(2) General Performance Standards:
(a) The potential adverse impacts of all recreational uses shall be mitigated,
and adequate provisions for shoreline rehabilitation shall be made part of
any proposed recreational use or development to ensure no net loss of
shoreline ecological function.
(b) Sites with fragile and unique shoreline conditions, such as high-quality
wetlands and wildlife habitats, shall be used only for non-intensive
recreation activities such as trails, viewpoints, interpretive signage, and
similar passive and low-impact facilities that result in no net loss of
shoreline ecological function, and do not require the construction and
placement of permanent structures.
(c) For proposed recreation developments that require the use of fertilizers,
pesticides, or other toxic chemicals, the proponent shall specify the BMPs
to be used to prevent these applications and resultant leachate from
entering adjacent waters.
(d) Recreational developments shall be located and designed to preserve,
enhance, or create scenic views and vistas.
(e) In approving shoreline recreational developments, the
Shoreline Administrator shall ensure the development will maintain,
enhance, or restore desirable shoreline features, including unique and
fragile areas, scenic views, and aesthetic values. The
Shoreline Administrator may, therefore, adjust or prescribe project
Page 287 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 98
dimensions, on-site location of project components, intensity of use,
screening, lighting, parking, and setback requirements.
(3) Signs indicating the public's right to access shoreline areas shall be installed and
maintained in conspicuous locations at all points of access.
(4) Recreational developments shall provide facilities for non-motorized access to
the shoreline, such as pedestrian and bicycle paths, and equestrian access, as
applicable. New motorized vehicle access shall be located and managed to
protect riparian, wetlands, and shrub-steppe habitat functions and value.
(5) Proposals for recreational developments shall include a landscape plan
indicating how native, self-sustaining vegetation is incorporated into the
proposal to maintain ecological functions. The removal of on-site native
vegetation shall be limited to the minimum necessary for the development of
permitted structures or facilities and shall be consistent with provisions of PMC
29.01.240, Shoreline Vegetation Conservation, and PMC 29.01, Article V,
Critical Areas.
(6) Accessory uses and support facilities such as maintenance facilities, utilities,
and other non-water-oriented uses shall be consolidated and located in upland
areas outside shoreline, wetland, and riparian buffers unless such facilities,
utilities, and uses are allowed in shoreline buffers based on the regulations of
this SMP.
(7) The placement of picnic tables, playground apparatus, and other similar minor
components within the floodways shall be permitted, provided such structures
are located and installed in such a manner as to prevent them from being swept
away during a flood event.
(8) Recreational facilities shall make adequate provisions, such as screening,
landscaping buffer strips, fences, and signs, to prevent trespass on adjacent
properties and to protect the value and enjoyment of adjacent or nearby private
properties and natural areas, as applicable.
(9) Recreational facilities or structures are only allowed to be built over water when
they provide public access or facilitate a water-dependent use and shall be the
minimum size necessary to accommodate the permitted activity.
(10) Recreational developments shall make adequate provisions for:
(a) On-site and off-site access and, where appropriate, equestrian access;
(b) Appropriate water supply and waste disposal methods; and
(c) Security and fire protection.
Page 288 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 99
(11) Structures associated with recreational development shall not exceed 35 feet in
height, except for as noted in PMC 29.01.210, Development Standards, when
such structures document that the height above 35 feet will not obstruct the view
of a substantial number of adjoining residences.
(12) Recreational development shall minimize effective impervious surfaces in
shoreline jurisdiction and incorporate low-impact development techniques.
29.01.420 Residential Development
(1) Single-family residential development is a preferred use when it is developed in
a manner consistent with SMP provisions.
(2) Residential development shall be located and constructed to result in no net loss
of shoreline ecological function.
(3) Lots for residential use shall have a maximum density consistent with City’s
Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations.
(4) Accessory uses and structures shall be located outside of the riparian buffer,
unless the structure is or supports a water-dependent use. Storage structures to
support water-related uses are not water-dependent uses, and therefore, shall be
located outside of the riparian buffer.
(5) All residential development shall be located or designed in such a manner as to
prevent measurable degradation of water quality from stormwater runoff.
Adequate mitigation measures shall be required and implemented where there is
the reasonable potential for such adverse effect on water quality.
(6) New shoreline residences and appurtenant structures shall be sufficiently set
back from steep slopes and shorelines vulnerable to erosion so structural
improvements, including bluff walls and other shoreline stabilization and
flood-control structures, are not necessary to protect proposed residences and
associated uses.
(7) New floating residences and overwater residential structures shall be prohibited
in shoreline jurisdiction.
(8) New, multi-unit residential development and the subdivision of land into five or
more lots, shall make adequate provisions for public access consistent with the
regulations set forth in PMC 29.01.260, Public Access.
(9) New residential development shall connect with sewer systems, as required by
the PMC.
(10) All new residential development shall meet the vegetation management
provisions contained in PMC 29.01.240, Shoreline Vegetation Conservation,
and PMC 29.01.530, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas.
Page 289 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 100
(11) Residential development clustering may be required by the
Shoreline Administrator where appropriate to minimize ecological and visual
impacts on shorelines, including minimization of impacts on shoreline
vegetation consistent with PMC 29.01.240, Shoreline Vegetation Conservation.
29.01.430 Shoreline Habitat and Natural Systems Enhancement Projects
(1) Shoreline restoration and enhancement activities designed to restore or enhance
shoreline ecological functions and processes and/or shoreline features should be
targeted toward meeting the needs of sensitive and/or regionally important
plant, fish, and wildlife species, and shall be given priority.
(2) Shoreline restoration, enhancement, and mitigation activities designed to create
dynamic and sustainable ecosystems to assist the City in achieving no net loss
of shoreline ecological functions are preferred.
(3) Restoration activities shall be carried out in accordance with an approved
Shoreline Restoration Plan and in accordance with the provisions of this SMP.
(4) To the extent possible, restoration, enhancement, and mitigation activities shall
be integrated and coordinated with other parallel natural resource management
efforts, such as those identified in the Shoreline Restoration Plan.
(5) Habitat creation, expansion, restoration, and enhancement projects may be
permitted subject to required state or federal permits when the applicant has
demonstrated that:
(a) The primary objective is clearly restoration or enhancement of the natural
character or ecological function of the shoreline;
(b) The project will not adversely impact spawning, nesting, or breeding in
Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas;
(c) Upstream or downstream properties or Fish and Wildlife Habitat
Conservation Areas will not be adversely affected;
(d) Water quality will not be degraded;
(e) Flood storage capacity will not be degraded;
(f) Impacts to critical areas and buffers will be avoided and where
unavoidable, minimized and mitigated; and
(g) The project will not interfere with the normal public use of the navigable
waters of the state.
Page 290 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 101
29.01.440 Shoreline Stabilization
(1) Shoreline restoration and enhancement activities designed to restore shoreline
ecological functions and processes and/or shoreline features should be targeted
toward meeting the needs of sensitive and/or regionally important plant, fish,
and wildlife species, and shall be given priority.
(2) New shoreline stabilization for new development is prohibited unless it can be
demonstrated that reasonable use of a lot or parcel legally created prior to the
effective date of this SMP is precluded without shore protection or is necessary
to restore ecological functions or hazardous substance remediation.
(3) Proposed designs for new or expanded shoreline stabilization shall be designed
in accordance with applicable state guidelines, must use the most current
scientific and technical information available, must document that alternative
solutions are not feasible or do not provide sufficient protection, must
demonstrate that future stabilization measures would not be required on the
project site or adjacent properties, and be certified by a qualified professional.
(4) Land subdivisions and lot line adjustments shall be designed to ensure future
development of the newly created lots will not require structural stabilization for
subsequent development to occur.
(5) New or expanded structural shoreline stabilization is prohibited except when
necessity is demonstrated consistent with the requirements of
WAC 173-26-231(3). Necessity is demonstrated through conclusive evidence
documented by a geotechnical analysis that there is a significant possibility that
the structure will be damaged within 3 years as a result of shoreline erosion
caused by wind/wave action or other hydraulic forces and only when significant
adverse impacts are mitigated to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological
functions and/or processes.
(6) Replacement of an existing shoreline stabilization structure with a similar
structure is permitted if there is a demonstrated need to protect existing primary
uses, structures or public facilities, including roads, bridges, railways, irrigation
and utility systems from erosion caused by stream undercutting or wave action.
The existing shoreline stabilization structure will be removed from the shoreline
as part of the replacement activity. Replacement walls or bulkheads shall not
encroach waterward of the OHWM or existing structure unless the facility was
occupied prior to January 1, 1992, and there are overriding safety or
environmental concerns. Proposed designs for new or expanded shore
stabilization shall be in accordance with applicable state guidelines and certified
by a qualified professional.
(7) Where a geotechnical analysis confirms a need to prevent potential damage to a
primary structure, but the need is not as immediate as 3 years, the analysis may
Page 291 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 102
still be used to justify more immediate authorization for shoreline stabilization
using bioengineering approaches.
(8) Shoreline stabilization projects that are part of a fish habitat enhancement
project meeting the criteria of RCW 77.55.181, will be authorized through a
Shoreline Exemption. Stabilization projects that are not part of such a fish
enhancement project will be regulated by this SMP.
(9) Small-scale shoreline stabilization projects (e.g., tree planting projects or other
minimally intrusive enhancements) shall be reviewed by a qualified professional
to ensure the project has been designed using the most current scientific and
technical information available.
(10) Large-scale or more complex shoreline stabilization projects (e.g., projects
requiring fill or excavation, placing objects in the water, or hardening the bank)
shall be designed by a qualified professional using the most current scientific
and technical information available. The applicant may be required to have a
qualified professional oversee construction or construct the project.
(11) New stabilization structures, when found to be necessary, will implement the
following standards:
(a) Limit the size of the project to the minimum amount necessary;
(b) Include measures to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions;
and
(c) Use biotechnical bank stabilization techniques unless those are
demonstrated to be infeasible or ineffective before implementing “hard”
structural stabilization measures.
29.01.450 Transportation: Trails, Roads, and Parking
(1) New or expanded motor vehicle and rail transportation facilities shall not be
located within shoreline jurisdiction, unless:
(a) The proponent demonstrates that no feasible upland alternatives exist;
(b) The project represents the minimum development necessary to serve
another specific, localized, and permitted shoreline use; or
(c) In the case of a water crossing, the proponent demonstrates the project is
necessary to further a substantial public interest.
(2) When new roads or road expansions are unavoidable in shoreline jurisdiction,
proposed transportation facilities shall be planned, located, and designed to
achieve the following:
Page 292 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 103
(a) Meet mitigation sequencing provisions of PMC 29.01.230 Environmental
Protection;
(b) Avoid adverse impacts on existing or planned water-oriented uses;
(c) Set back from the OHWM to allow for a usable shoreline area for
vegetation conservation and any preferred shoreline uses unless infeasible;
(d) Minimize grading, vegetation clearing, and alterations of the natural
topography; and
(e) Use BMPs for preventing erosion and degradation of surface water
quality.
(3) Improvements to existing motor vehicle and rail transportation facilities shall
not interfere with pedestrian and bicycle access and shall, whenever possible,
provide for expansion and enhancement of pedestrian and bicycle transportation
facilities.
(4) Transportation facilities and services for motor vehicles and rail shall utilize
existing transportation corridors whenever possible.
(5) The development, improvement, and expansion of pedestrian and bicycle
transportation facilities are allowed within all environments. Such transportation
facilities are a preferred use wherever they are compatible with the natural
character, resources, and ecology of the shoreline.
(6) Pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities shall be designed, located, and
constructed consistent with the policies and regulations for public access as
provided in PMC 29.01.260, Public Access, of this SMP. Linkage among
shoreline parks, recreation areas, and public access points is encouraged, when
feasible.
(7) Parking facilities are not a water-dependent use and shall only be permitted in
the shoreline jurisdiction to support an authorized use where it can be
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Shoreline Administrator that there are no
feasible alternative locations away from the shoreline. Parking as a primary use
shall not be allowed within 50 feet of edge of riparian vegetation corridor.
Accessory parking facilities shall be subject to the same permit type as the
primary use.
(8) Accessory parking facilities shall be planned to avoid or minimize adverse
effects on unique or fragile shoreline features and shall not result in a net loss of
shoreline ecological functions or adversely affect existing or planned
water-dependent uses. Parking facilities shall be located upland of the principal
structure, building, or development they serve, and preferably outside of
shoreline jurisdiction, except:
Page 293 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 104
(a) Where the proponent demonstrates that an alternate location would reduce
adverse impacts on the shoreline and adjacent uses;
(b) Where another location is not feasible; and/or
(c) Except when ADA standards require otherwise.
(d) In such cases, the applicant shall demonstrate use of measures to reduce adverse
impacts of parking facilities in shoreline jurisdiction, such as low-impact
development techniques, buffering, or other measures approved by the
Shoreline Administrator.
(9) Parking facilities shall be landscaped in a manner to minimize adverse visual
and aesthetic impacts on adjacent shoreline and abutting properties.
(10) All forms of transportation facilities shall, wherever feasible, consolidate water
crossings and make joint use of rights-of-way with existing or planned future
primary utility facilities and other transportation facility modalities.
(11) Improvements to all existing transportation facilities shall provide for the
reestablishment and enhancement of natural vegetation along the shoreline
when appropriate.
(12) If located in the side yard or waterward side of a structure, loading areas shall
be screened from view of pedestrians on either side of the waterway. The visual
screen shall comprise a fence or wall with trees and shrubs consistent with the
City’s landscape standards.
(13) Shoreline crossings and culverts shall be designed to minimize adverse impacts
on riparian and aquatic habitat and shall allow for fish passage. See
PMC 29.01.530, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas, for regulations governing
crossings of non-shoreline streams located in shoreline jurisdiction.
(14) Trails shall be designed consistent with public access requirements in
PMC 29.01.260, Public Access.
29.01.460 Utilities
(1) Non-water-oriented utility production and processing facilities and transmission
facilities are permitted in shoreline jurisdiction only if no practical upland
alternative or location exists. New primary utility production and processing
facilities or parts of those facilities, such as power plants, solid waste storage, or
disposal facilities that are non-water-oriented, should not be permitted within
shoreline jurisdiction unless no other options are feasible.
(2) The principal uses permitted by this section include sewage collection, holding,
transfer and treatment pipelines, tanks, structures, containment facilities, and
buildings. Water diversion, treatment and conveyance facilities are also
Page 294 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 105
considered principle uses. Accessory facilities are also permitted, including, but
not limited to:
(a) Plant monitoring and control facilities and on-site administrative offices;
(b) Plant access and logistical facilities such as storage areas and material
handling ramps and facilities, including utility delivery (electrical and
communication) facilities;
(c) Plant security and safety features such as fences and signage; and
(d) Other accessory or auxiliary uses or features, necessary to effective and
efficient operation of the plant, which cannot feasibly be located outside
the shoreline jurisdiction.
(3) Expansion of existing primary utility facilities within shoreline jurisdiction must
demonstrate:
(a) The expansion is designed to protect adjacent shorelands from erosion,
pollution, or other environmentally detrimental factors during and after
construction.
(b) The project is planned to fit existing natural topography as much as
practical and avoid alteration of the existing natural environment.
(c) Debris, overburden, and other construction waste materials shall be
disposed of so as to prevent erosion or pollution of a waterbody.
(4) New primary utility facilities and expansions shall include provisions to control
the quantity and quality of surface water runoff to natural waterbodies, using
BMPs to retain natural flow rates. A maintenance program to ensure continued
proper functioning of such new facilities shall be required.
(5) Applications for installation of utility facilities other than water-dependent
facilities within the High Intensity Environment Designation shall include the
following:
(a) Reason why the utility facility must be in shoreline jurisdiction;
(b) Alternative locations considered and reasons for their elimination;
(c) Location of the same, similar, or other utility facilities in the vicinity of
the proposed project;
(d) Proposed method(s) of construction;
(e) Plans for reclamation of areas to be disturbed during construction;
(f) Landscape plans;
Page 295 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 106
(g) Methods to achieve no net loss of ecological function and minimize
clearing of native vegetation; and
(h) Consistency with City’s plans for utilities, where such plans exist.
(6) Applications for installation of utility facilities shall include the following:
(a) Proposed method(s) of construction;
(b) Plans for reclamation of areas to be disturbed during construction;
(c) Landscape plans; and
(d) Methods to achieve no net loss of ecological function and minimize
clearing of native vegetation.
(7) Where feasible, utilities shall be consolidated within a single easement and
utilize existing rights-of-way. Any utility located within property owned by the
utility, which must of necessity cross shoreline jurisdiction, shall be designed
and operated to reserve the option of general public recreational usage of the
right-of-way in the future. This option shall be exercised by the public only
where:
(a) The public will not be exposed to dangers from the utility equipment; and
(b) The utility itself will not be subjected to unusual risks of damage by the
public.
(8) In areas where utilities must cross shoreline jurisdiction, they shall do so by the
most direct route feasible, unless such a route would negatively affect an
environmentally critical area, obstruct public access to the shoreline, or interfere
with the navigability of a waterbody regulated by this SMP. See PMC
29.01.530, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas, for regulations governing crossings
of non-shoreline streams located in shoreline jurisdiction.
(9) Utility facilities shall be designed and located in a manner that protects scenic
views and minimizes adverse aesthetic impacts.
(10) New utilities, which must be constructed across shoreline jurisdiction in
previously undisturbed areas, must submit a mitigation plan demonstrating the
restoration of the shoreline to at least its existing condition. Upon completion of
utility installation or maintenance, any disturbed areas shall be regraded to be
compatible with the natural terrain of the area and revegetated with appropriate
native plants to prevent erosion.
(11) Outside of the High Intensity Environment Designations, all underwater
pipelines or those paralleling the waterway transporting liquids potentially
injurious to aquatic life or water quality shall be prohibited, unless no other
Page 296 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 107
alternative exists to serve a public interest. In those limited instances where
permitted, shut-off valves shall be provided at both sides of the waterbody
except for public sanitary sewers of a gravity or siphon nature. In all cases, no
net loss of ecological functions shall be maintained.
(12) Where utilities cannot cross a shoreline waterbody via a bridge or other existing
water crossing, the utilities shall evaluate site-specific habitat conditions and
demonstrate whether impacts can mitigated to negatively impact substrate, or
whether utilities will need to be bored beneath the waterbody such that the
substrate is not disturbed. Construction of pipelines placed under aquatic areas
shall be placed in a sleeve to avoid the need for excavation in the event of a
failure in the future.
(13) Minor trenching1to allow the installation of necessary underground pipes or
cables is allowed if no alternative, including boring, is feasible, and if:
(a) Impacts on fish and wildlife habitat are avoided to the maximum extent
possible.
(b) The utility installation shall not increase or decrease the natural rate,
extent, or opportunity of channel migration.
(c) Appropriate BMPs are employed to prevent water quality impacts or other
environmental degradation.
(14) Utility installation and maintenance operations shall be conducted in a manner
that does not negatively affect surface water quality or quantity. Applications
for new utility projects in shoreline jurisdiction shall include a list of BMPs to
protect water quality.
1 Minor trenching is defined as up to 2.5 feet wide and 6 feet deep, and less than 100 feet.
Page 297 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 108
Article V. Critical Areas
29.01.500 Critical Areas
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of SMP Article V, Critical Areas, is to conserve and protect
the values and functions of environmentally sensitive and hazardous areas,
which contribute to public health, safety, and welfare of the community
without violating any citizen's constitutional rights to the use of property
as required by the GMA of 1990 (Chapter 17, Laws of 1990) and the SMA
(RCW 90.58) through the application of the most current scientific and
technical information available.
(b) The City shall regulate in shoreline jurisdiction all uses, activities, and
development within, adjacent to, or likely to affect one or more critical
areas.
(2) Critical Areas. Critical areas of concern to the City of Pasco within the shoreline
jurisdiction include:
(a) Wetlands;
(b) Fish and wildlife habitats;
(c) Aquifer recharge areas;
(d) Flood hazard areas; and
(e) Geologically hazardous areas such as those subject to landslide and steep
slope failures, erosion, seismic events, mine collapse, and volcanic
hazards.
(3) Critical Area Categories. The City finds that these critical areas fall into one or
both of the following categories:
(a) Critical areas provide a variety of valuable and beneficial biological and
physical functions that benefit the City and its residents; and
(b) Critical areas pose potential threat to human safety or to public and private
property.
(4) Intent. The intent of this section is to implement the provisions of the GMA,
SMA, and the Comprehensive Plan by managing development in harmony with
critical areas. This section seeks to:
Page 298 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 109
(a) Protect members of the public and public resources and facilities from
injury, loss of life, or property damage due to landslides and steep slope
failures, erosion, seismic events, volcanic eruptions, or flooding;
(b) Protect unique, fragile and valuable elements of the environment,
including fish and wildlife and their habitats;
(c) Mitigate unavoidable impacts to environmentally sensitive areas by
regulating alterations in and adjacent to critical areas;
(d) Prevent cumulative adverse environmental impacts to water quality and
wetlands;
(e) Meet the requirements of the Washington GMA (RCW 36.70A), and SMA
(RCW 90.58) with regard to the protection of critical area lands;
(f) Coordinate environmental review and permitting of proposals to avoid
duplication and delay of desirable actions.
(5) Most Current Scientific and Technical Information:
(a) WAC 173.26.201(2)(a) requires the City to identify and assemble the most
current, accurate, and complete scientific and technical information
available regarding the development of policies related to identification of
and policies governing management recommendations for critical areas.
(b) Critical Area Reports, mitigation plans, and decisions to permit the
alteration of critical areas within the shoreline jurisdiction shall rely on the
most current scientific and technical information to ensure the protection
of the ecological functions and values of critical areas and must give
special consideration to conservation or protection measures necessary to
preserve or enhance anadromous fish and their habitat.
(c) The most current scientific and technical information that is consistent
with criteria established in WAC 173.26.201(2)(a), and may include the
following:
(i) Critical area maps;
(ii) Maps and reference documents in the City of Pasco’s Inventory,
Characterization, and Analysis Report, as applicable;
Page 299 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 110
(iii) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle maps,
including Washington Department of Natural Resources Geologic
Information Portal2
(iv) Aerial photographs;
(v) Soil Survey of Franklin County, Washington, by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service;
(vi) National Wetland Inventory maps; and
(vii) WDFW Priority Habitats and Species maps.
29.01.510 General Provisions
(1) Authorizations Required. Prior to fulfilling the requirements of this section, the
City shall not grant any approval or permission to alter the condition of any
land, water or vegetation, or to construct or alter any structure or improvement
including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Building Permit;
(b) Special Use Permit;
(c) Shoreline Special Use Permit;
(d) Shoreline Substantial Development Permit;
(e) Shoreline Variance Permit;
(f) Binding Site Plan;
(g) Short Subdivision;
(h) Subdivision;
(i) Zoning Variance Permit;
(j) Rezone; or
(k) Any other adopted permit or required approval not expressly exempted by
this section
(2) Jurisdiction:
2 Geologic Information Portal | WA - DNR
Page 300 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 111
(a) This section shall apply to all lands, all land uses and development and all
structures and facilities in City’s shoreline jurisdiction. This section shall
apply to every person, individual, firm, partnership, corporation,
governmental agency or other entity that owns, leases, or administers land
within the City’s shoreline jurisdiction.
(b) This section provides regulations for land use and development in and
adjacent to critical areas within the City’s shoreline jurisdiction.
(3) Allowed uses:
(a) All allowed activities shall use reasonable methods supported by the most
current scientific and technical information or accepted BMPs with the
least amount of potential impact to the critical areas. Any incidental
damage to or alteration of a critical area that is not a necessary outcome of
the exempted activity shall be restored, rehabilitated, or replaced at the
responsible party's expense. This includes, but is not limited to, access
ways or paths, vegetation removal or damage beyond a reasonable work
zone, and grading and clearing not essential to the ongoing operation of
the site's use. Uses allowed under this section do not give permission to
destroy a critical area or ignore risk from natural hazards. See PMC
29.01.770, Exemptions from Shoreline Substantial Development Permits,
for provisions for exempted activities within shoreline jurisdiction.
Allowed uses include:
(i) Modification of any existing structure that does not alter the
structure to further intrude into a critical area or established buffer
and does not increase risk to life and property. Modification
includes construction of tenant improvements, fences, decks,
patios, driveways, signs, and accessory structures.
(ii) Operation and maintenance of any system of existing dikes, levees,
ditches, drains, or other facilities which were created, developed or
utilized primarily as a part of a drainage or diking system.
Operation and maintenance does not necessarily include the
expansion or new construction of drainage ditches and related
facilities. See PMC 29.01.770, Exemptions from Shoreline
Substantial Development Permits, for additional provisions that
may be applicable.
(iii) Removal of hazardous trees and vegetation and, when necessary,
measures to control or prevent a fire or halt the spread of disease or
damaging insects consistent with the State Forest Practices Act;
RCW 76.09, provided that no vegetation shall be removed from a
critical area or its buffer without approval from the City.
Page 301 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 112
(iv) Activities involving artificially created wetlands or streams
intentionally created from non-wetland sites, including, but not
limited to: grass-lined swales, irrigation and drainage ditches,
detention facilities, and landscape features, except those features
that provide critical habitat for anadromous fish and those features
that were created as mitigation for projects or alterations subject to
the provisions of this section.
(v) Passive recreational activities, including, but not limited to,
fishing, bird watching, boating, swimming, hiking, and use of
nature trails, provided the activity does not alter the critical area or
its buffer.
(vi) The harvesting of wild crops in a manner that is not injurious to
natural reproduction of such crops and provided the harvesting
does not require tilling soil, planting crops, or changing existing
topography, water conditions or water sources.
(vii) Educational and scientific research.
(viii) Existing and ongoing agricultural activities and related
development activities, provided no alteration of flood storage
capacity or conveyance, or increase in the extent or nature of
impact to a critical area or its buffer occurs, beyond that which has
occurred prior to the effective date of this section.
(b) If the proposed activity meets any of the listed allowed uses, including any
BMP and/or restoration requirements, completion of a critical area
checklist or further Critical Area Review is not required.
(4) Critical Area Review:
(a) The City of Pasco shall complete a Critical Area Review prior to granting
any shoreline permit approval for a development or other alteration on a
site that is found to likely include, or be adjacent to, or have significant
impact upon one or more critical areas, unless otherwise provided in this
section. As part of this review, the Shoreline Administrator shall verify the
information submitted by the applicant, and:
(i) Confirm the extent, nature, and type of any critical areas identified
and evaluate any required Critical Area Detailed Study;
(ii) Determine whether the development proposal conforms to the
purposes and performance standards of this section;
(iii) Assess impacts on the critical area from the activities and uses
proposed and determine whether any proposed alterations to, or
Page 302 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 113
impacts upon, critical areas are necessary and unavoidable in order
to meet the objectives of the proposal; and
(iv) Determine if any required mitigation plans proposed by the
applicant are sufficient to protect the critical area and public
health, safety, and welfare concerns consistent with the goals,
purposes, objectives, and requirements of this section.
(b) The applicant shall be responsible for the initiation, preparation,
submission, and expense of all required assessments, studies, plans,
reconnaissance, and other work in support of the application. The
applicant shall provide the City with digital copies and paper copies of
reports/studies and maps prepared for the reports/studies, including all
geotechnical studies and mapping.
(5) Minimum Standards. Any proposed activity shall be conditioned as necessary to
mitigate impacts to critical areas to ensure no net loss of ecological function and
conform to the performance standards required by this section and
PMC 29.01.230, Environmental Protection.
(6) Concurrent Requirements. Lands characterized by one or more critical area
feature may also be subject to other regulations established by this section due
to overlap or multiple functions of some critical areas. In the event of conflict
between regulations, the most restrictive regulations shall apply.
(7) Critical Area Checklist:
(a) For any proposed activity not found to be exempt under PMC 29.01.510
(3), or PMC 29.01.770, Exemptions from Shoreline Substantial
Development Permits, the applicant shall complete a critical area checklist
on forms provided by the City. The checklist must be submitted to the
Shoreline Administrator prior to consideration of any permit request that
requires a Critical Area Review, as described in PMC 29.01.510, General
Provisions.
(b) Following receipt of the checklist, the Shoreline Administrator will
conduct a review to determine whether there are any critical area
indicators present that may be impacted by the proposal.
(8) Initial Determination:
(a) If the Shoreline Administrator determines the site potentially includes, or
is adjacent to critical areas, or the proposed project could have significant
adverse impacts on critical areas, the Shoreline Administrator shall notify
the applicant that a Critical Area Detailed Study is required for each of the
indicated critical area types.
Page 303 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 114
(b) If the review of the checklist and critical area resources do not indicate
that critical areas are included or adjacent to the activity or could suffer
probable significant adverse impacts from the activity, then the
Shoreline Administrator shall rule that the Critical Area Review is
complete. The determination shall be noted on the checklist.
(c) The applicant shall acknowledge in writing that a determination regarding
the apparent absence of one or more critical areas by the Shoreline
Administrator is not intended to be an expert certification regarding the
presence of critical areas and the determination is subject to possible
reconsideration and reopening if new information is received. If the
applicant wants greater assurance of the accuracy of the Critical Area
Review determination, the applicant may hire a qualified professional to
provide such assurances.
(9) Waivers from Critical Area Detailed Study Requirements:
(a) The Shoreline Administrator may waive the requirement for a
Critical Area Detailed Study if there is substantial evidence that:
(i) There will be no alteration of the critical areas or required buffer;
(ii) The development proposal will not impact the critical area in a
manner contrary to the purpose, intent and requirements of this
section; and
(iii) The performance standards required by this section will be met.
(b) In making the determination, the Shoreline Administrator may use any of
the most current scientific information and the Critical Area reference
maps and/or inventories identified in PMC 29.01.500 (6).
(c) Notice of the findings substantiating the waiver will be attached to the
permit and filed with the application records.
(10) Critical Area Detailed Studies:
(a) Preliminary Reconnaissance. If a Critical Area Detailed Study is
determined to be necessary, then a data review and field reconnaissance
shall be performed by a qualified professional for that type of critical area.
If the Detailed Study reveals no critical area is present, then a statement of
this finding along with supporting evidence shall be prepared by the
professional and submitted to the City. An approved finding of the lack of
a critical area shall satisfy all of the requirements for a Detailed Study.
(b) Minimum Requirements. If the data review and field reconnaissance
reveals that a critical area is present, then a complete Detailed Study shall
be prepared by the applicant and submitted to the City. At a minimum, a
Page 304 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 115
Critical Area Detailed Study shall comply with the specific criteria in
PMC 29.01.520 through PMC 29.01.560, and clearly document:
(i) The boundary and extent of the critical area;
(ii) The existing function, value, and/or hazard associated with the
critical area;
(iii) The probable impact upon the function, value, and/or hazard
associated with the critical area from the project as proposed; and
(iv) A mitigation plan including the items in PMC 29.01.510 (13).
(c) Limitations to Study Area. If the applicant, together with assistance from
the City, cannot obtain permission for access to properties adjacent to the
project area, then the Critical Area Detailed Study may be limited
accordingly.
(d) Preparation and Determination of Completeness. The Critical Area
Detailed Study shall be prepared by a qualified professional for the type of
critical area or areas involved. The qualified professional may consult with
the Shoreline Administrator prior to or during preparation of the Critical
Area Detailed Study to obtain City approval of modifications to the
contents of the study where, in the judgment of the qualified professional,
more or less information is required to adequately address the critical area
impacts and required mitigation.
If the Critical Area Detailed Study is found to be incomplete, the applicant shall
be notified and the Critical Area Review process shall be suspended pending
correction of the inadequacies. Upon receipt of a complete Critical Area Detailed
Study a final determination is to be rendered.
(11) Final Determination. Following submission of a completed Detailed Study, the
Shoreline Administrator will review the Detailed Study and make a
determination, based on the Critical Area Detailed Study and any other
available and appropriate materials. The Shoreline Administrator's
determination will address the adequacy of the project, as proposed, to mitigate
any effects it may have on critical areas that are included within or adjacent to
the project site. The Shoreline Administrator may elect to request assistance
from state resource agency staff if necessary. In addition, the Shoreline
Administrator will assess the adequacy of the project proposal's compliance
with the applicable performance standards and this SMP. Notice of this
determination shall be attached to the permit and the Critical Area Review shall
be completed.
(a) A Favorable Determination. A determination that the project proposal
adequately mitigates its impacts on the critical areas and complies with the
applicable performance standards satisfies the provisions of this Title only.
Page 305 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 116
It should not be construed as endorsement or approval of the original or
any subsequent permit applications.
(b) An Unfavorable Determination. When a project proposal is found to not
adequately mitigate its impacts on the critical areas and/or not comply
with applicable performance standards, the Shoreline Administrator shall
prepare written notice of the reasons for the finding of non-compliance.
Such notice shall identify the critical area impacted and the nature of the
impact.
Following notice of a determination from the Critical Area Review that the
proposed activity does not adequately mitigate its impacts on the critical areas
and/or does not comply with applicable performance standards, the applicant may
request consideration of a revised mitigation plan. If the revision is found to be
substantial and relevant to the Critical Area Review, the Shoreline Administrator
may re-open the Critical Area Review and make a new determination based on
this revised mitigation plan.
(12) Completion of the Critical Area Review. If at any time prior to completion of
the public input process on associated permits or approvals, the City receives
new evidence that a critical area may be included in, adjacent to, or significantly
impacted by the proposed activity, then the City shall re-open the
Critical Area Review process and shall require whatever level of
Critical Area Review and mitigation as indicated by the evidence. Once the
public input process on all associated permits or approvals is completed and the
record is closed, then the City's determination regarding critical areas shall be
final, unless appeal is filed as per PMC 29.01.810, Appeals.
(13) Mitigation Standards:
(a) All proposed critical area alterations shall include mitigation sufficient to
maintain the function and values of the critical area or to prevent risk from
a hazard posed by a critical area. Mitigation of one critical area impact
should not result in unmitigated impacts to another critical area.
Mitigation includes avoiding, minimizing, or compensating for adverse
impacts to critical areas or their buffers. The preferred sequence of
mitigation is defined in PMC 29.01.230, Environmental Protection.
(b) Possible mitigation techniques include, but are not limited to, buffers,
setbacks, limits on clearing and grading, creation of artificial wetlands,
streambank stabilization, modified construction methods, and BMPs for
erosion control and maintenance of water quality.
(c) All proposed mitigation shall be documented in a mitigation plan included
as an element of the Critical Area Detailed Study. The mitigation plan
shall include a description of the following:
(i) The proposed mitigation;
Page 306 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 117
(ii) How the proposed mitigation will maintain the critical area
function, any ongoing monitoring and/or inspection that may be
required to ensure the adequacy of the proposed mitigation, and an
evaluation of the anticipated effectiveness of the proposed
mitigation;
(iii) Any remedial measures that may be required, depending on the
outcome of that ongoing monitoring and/or inspection;
(iv) Any required critical expertise necessary to install, monitor, or
inspect the proposed mitigation; and
(v) Any bonding or other security required to insure performance
and/or maintenance of the proposed mitigation.
(14) Buffers:
(a) Buffers have, in some cases, been determined to be necessary to protect
critical areas and their functions. Where specific buffers are identified,
those buffers are deemed "required" or "standard" buffers. See Table
29.01.210 (2) for riparian buffers and PMC 29.01.520 for wetland buffers.
(i) Except as otherwise specified herein, required buffers shall be
retained in their pre-existing condition. If a project does not
propose any alteration of buffers or of the associated critical area,
then subject to the following provision, no additional mitigation
will be required to protect the critical area. Additional mitigation
beyond the required buffer shall be required if the
Shoreline Administrator finds that, based on unique features of the
critical area or its buffer or of the proposed activity, the required
buffers will not adequately protect the function of the critical area
or prevent risk of hazard from the critical area and that additional
mitigation or buffering is required to protect the critical area
function or to prevent risk of hazard from the critical area.
(ii) The buffer shall be marked prior to any site alteration, and
boundary markers shall be visible, durable, and permanently
affixed to the ground. The boundary markers shall remain until all
activity is completed and a final site inspection is completed.
(iii) An 8-foot-minimum setback shall be required from the buffer area
for any construction of impervious surface area greater
120 square feet. Clearing, grading, and filling within this setback
shall only be allowed when the applicant can demonstrate that
vegetation within the buffer will not be damaged.
(iv) Where temporary buffer disturbance or alteration has or will occur
in conjunction with regulated activities, revegetation with
Page 307 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 118
appropriate native vegetation shall be required and completed 1
month before the end of the growing season.
(v) Normal non-destructive pruning and trimming of vegetation for
maintenance purposes, or thinning of limbs of individual trees to
provide a view corridor, shall not be subject to these buffer
requirements. Enhancement of a view corridor shall not be
construed to mean excessive removal of trees or vegetation that
impairs views. See also PMC 29.01.240, Shoreline Vegetation
Conservation.
(b) If the applicant proposes to reduce required buffers or to alter the required
buffer, then the applicant shall demonstrate why such buffer modification,
together with any alternative mitigation proposed in the Critical Area
Detailed Study, is sufficient to protect the critical area function or to
prevent risk of hazard from the critical area.
(c) The Critical Area Detailed Study shall make adequate provision for
long-term buffer protection. Periodic inspection of the buffers may be
required if deemed to ensure long-term buffer protection.
(15) Bonding. The Shoreline Administrator shall have the discretion to require a
bond, which will ensure compliance with the mitigation plan if activity related
to the protection of the critical area(s) (e.g., monitoring or maintenance) or
construction is scheduled to take place after the issuance of the City's permit.
The bond shall be in the form of a surety bond, performance bond, assignment
of savings account, or an irrevocable standby letter of credit guaranteed by a
financial institution with terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney.
The bond shall be in the amount of 125% of the estimated cost of the
uncompleted actions or construction or the estimated cost of restoring the
function and values of the critical area that are at risk, whichever is higher. The
term of the bond shall be 2 years, or until the additional activity or construction
has been completed and passed the necessary inspections, whichever is longer.
(16) Incentives. The following incentives are intended to minimize the burden to
individual property owners from application of the provisions of this section:
(a) Open Space. Any property owner on whose property a critical area or its
associated buffer is located and who proposes to put the critical area and
buffer in a separate tract may apply for current use property tax
assessment on that separate tract through Franklin County, pursuant to
RCW 84.34.
(b) Conservation Easement. Any person whose property contains an identified
critical area or its associated buffer may place a conservation easement
over that portion of the property by naming a beneficiary under
RCW 64.04.130 as beneficiary of the conservation easement. This
Page 308 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 119
conservation easement may be in lieu of a separate critical areas tract that
qualifies for open-space tax assessment described in PMC 29.01.510 (16).
The purpose of the easement shall be to preserve, protect, maintain,
restore, and limit future use of the property affected. The terms of the
conservation easement may include prohibitions or restrictions on access.
(17) Critical Areas Mapping. The approximate location and extent of critical areas in
the City of Pasco may include the following:
(a) Critical areas shown on the critical areas map adopted as a part of the
Comprehensive Plan.
(b) Other mapping resources provided in PMC 29.01.500 (6).
Mapping resources are to be used only as guides to alert the user to the possible
distribution, location, and extent of critical areas. Mapping shall be utilized as a
source of generalized information and shall not be considered as regulatory
standards or substitute for site-specific assessments. The actual type, extent, and
boundaries of critical areas shall be determined in the field by a qualified
specialist according to the procedures, definitions, and criteria established in this
section.
29.01.520 Wetlands
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to promote public health and welfare by
instituting local measures to preserve naturally occurring wetlands that exist in
the City’s shoreline jurisdiction for their associated value. These areas may
serve a variety of vital functions, including, but not limited to, flood storage and
conveyance, water quality protection, recharge and discharge areas for
groundwater, erosion control, sediment control, fish and wildlife habitat,
recreation, education, and scientific research.
(2) Wetland Designation. Under SMP Article V, Critical Areas, wetlands shall be
designated in accordance with the definitions, methods, and standards set forth
in the approved 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual, as amended and
its regional applicable regional supplements, as amended (The Arid West Final
Regional Supplement was last updated in 2008 at time of SMP adoption). All
areas within the City of Pasco meeting the criteria identified in this delineation
manual, regardless of whether or not these areas have been formally identified
as wetlands, are hereby designated as wetland critical areas and are subject to
the provisions of SMP Article V, Critical Areas.
(3) Wetland Rating (Classification):
(a) The wetlands rating system is intended to differentiate between wetlands
based on their sensitivity to disturbance, rarity, irreplaceability, and the
functions and values they provide. A general description of wetland
Page 309 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 120
categories and the rationale for each category is provided in
PMC 29.01.080, Definitions (see "Wetland Categories").
(b) Wetlands shall be rated (classified) as either Category I, Category II,
Category III, or Category IV according to the criteria listed in this section.
This rating system is based on the Washington Department of Ecology's
Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Eastern Washington-
Ecology Publication #14-06-030 (October 2014), as amended. The most
current copy of this document should be used in classifying wetlands and
developing wetland mitigation plans.
(4) Wetland Indicators. The following indicators of wetland presence shall be used
by the Shoreline Administrator to determine if a Wetland Detailed Study is
needed:
(a) Listing in the City's Critical Areas Mapping resources as a wetland or
resources listed in PMC 29.01.500 (6);
(b) Documentation, through references state or federal handbooks and or
reports by qualified experts;
(c) A finding by a qualified wetland biologist that an appropriate hydrologic,
soil, and/or vegetation regime indicative of a wetland exists; or
(d) A reasonable belief by the Shoreline Administrator that a wetland may
exist, supported by a site visit and subsequent consultation with a qualified
wetland biologist.
(5) Wetland Detailed Study. Requirements. If a Wetland Detailed Study is required,
it shall meet the following requirements in addition to the Basic Requirements
identified in PMC 29.01.510 (10):
(a) The Wetland Detailed Study shall be completed by a qualified wetlands
biologist.
(b) The extent and boundaries of any wetlands shall be determined in
accordance with the methodology specified under PMC 29.01.520 (2). The
boundary shall be surveyed and mapped at a scale no smaller than 1 inch
equals 200 feet.
(c) A wetland community description and wetland classification shall be
completed, consistent with the requirements of PMC 29.01.520 (2).
(d) A written values and functions assessment shall be completed and address
site hydrology (source of water in the system, water quality, flood and
stream flow attenuation, seasonality of presence of water, if applicable),
soils, vegetation, fish and wildlife habitat, recreation, and aesthetics.
Page 310 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 121
(e) The site plan for the proposed activity shall be mapped at the same scale
as the wetland map, showing the extent of the proposed activity in
relationship to the surveyed wetland, including a detailed narrative
describing the project, its relationship to the wetland, and its potential
impact on the wetland.
(f) The proposed mitigation plan shall follow the general mitigation plan
requirements described in PMC 29.01.510 (13), and address how the
activity has been mitigated to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to
wetlands. The Wetland Mitigation in Washington State – Part 2:
Developing Mitigation Plans, Department of Ecology
Publication # 06-06-011b, March 2006 (or any succeeding documents)
should be used as a basis for mitigation.
(6) Wetland Detailed Study Exemptions. In addition to activities exempted in
PMC 29.01.510 (3) and PMC 29.01.770, the following activities shall not
require a Wetland Detailed Study, provided they are conducted using accepted
BMPs as determined by the Shoreline Administrator:
(a) Conservation or preservation of soil, water, vegetation, fish, or other
wildlife.
(7) Basic Wetland Requirement. A regulated wetland or its required buffer can only
be altered if the Wetland Detailed Study shows that:
(a) The proposed alteration does not degrade the quantitative and qualitative
functions of the wetland and results in not net loss of ecological function,
or
(b) Any degradation can be adequately mitigated to protect the wetland
function. Any proposed alteration approved pursuant to this section shall
include mitigation necessary to mitigate the impacts of the proposed
alteration on the wetland as described in this section and
PMC 29.01.510 (13).
(8) Required Buffers:
(a) Buffer Requirements. The following buffers shall be required for wetlands
based on the rating of the wetland as outlined in PMC 29.01.520 (3) and
land-use intensity described in Table 29.01.520 (8)(b).
(i) Any wetland created, restored, or enhanced as compensation for
approved wetland alterations shall also include the standard buffer
required for the category of the created, restored, or enhanced
wetland.
Table 29.01.520 (8)(a): Wetland Buffer Width Requirements
Page 311 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 122
Wetland Characteristics
Buffer Width by Impact of
Proposed Land Use
Other Measures
Recommended for Protection
Category IV Wetlands (For wetlands scoring less than 16 – 18 points for all functions)
Score for all three basic functions is less
than 16 points
Low – 25 feet
Moderate – 40 feet
High – 50 feet
No recommendations at this
time
Category III Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 16 to 18 points for all functions)
Moderate level of function for habitat
(score for habitat 6 to 7 points)
*If wetland scores 8 to 9 habitat points,
use Category II buffers
Low – 75 feet
Moderate – 110 feet
High – 150 feet
No recommendations at this
time
Score habitat for 3 to 5 points
Low – 40 feet
Moderate – 60 feet
High – 80 feet
No recommendations at this
time
Category II Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 19 to 21 points or more for all functions or having the “Special
Characteristics” identified in the rating system)
High level of function for habitat (score
for habitat 8 to 9 points)
Low – 100 feet
Moderate – 150 feet
High – 200 feet
Maintain connections to other
habitat areas
Moderate level of function for habitat
(score for habitat 5 to 7 points)
Low – 75 feet
Moderate – 110 feet
High – 150 feet
No recommendations at this
time
High level of function for water quality
improvement and low for habitat (score
for water quality 8 to 9 points; habitat
less than 5 points)
Low – 50 feet
Moderate – 75 feet
High – 100 feet
No additional surface
discharges of untreated runoff
Riparian forest
Buffer width to be based on
score for habitat functions or
water quality functions
Riparian forest wetlands need
to be protected at a watershed
or subbasin scale
Other protection based on
needs to protect habitat and
water quality functions
Not meeting above characteristic
Low – 50 feet
Moderate – 75 feet
High – 100 feet
No recommendations at this
time
Page 312 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 123
Wetland Characteristics
Buffer Width by Impact of
Proposed Land Use
Other Measures
Recommended for Protection
Vernal pool
Low – 100 feet
Moderate – 150 feet
High – 200 feet
Or develop a regional plan to
protect the most important
vernal pool complexes; buffers
of vernal pools outside
protection zones can then be
reduced to:
Low – 40 feet
Moderate – 60 feet
High – 80 feet
No intensive grazing or tilling
of wetland
Category I Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 22 points or more for all functions or having the “Special
Characteristics” identified in the rating system)
Wetlands of High Conservation Value,
Bogs
Low – 125 feet
Moderate – 190 feet
High – 250 feet
No additional surface
discharges to wetland or its
tributaries
No septic systems within 300
feet of wetland
Restore degraded parts of
buffer
High level of function for habitat (score
for habitat 8 to 9 points)
Low – 100 feet
Moderate – 150 feet
High – 200 feet
Restore degraded parts of
buffer
Maintain connections to other
habitat areas
Moderate level of function for habitat
(score for habitat 5 to 7 points)
Low – 75 feet
Moderate – 110 feet
High – 150 feet
No recommendations at this
time
High level of function for water quality
improvement (8 to 9 points) and low for
habitat (less than 5 points)
Low – 50 feet
Moderate – 75 feet
High – 100 feet
No additional surface
discharges of untreated runoff
Not meeting above characteristics
Low – 50 feet
Moderate – 75 feet
High – 100 feet
No recommendations at this
time
Note:
See Table 29.01.520 (8)(b) in this section, or as amended by Ecology, for types of land uses that can result in low,
moderate, and high impacts to wetlands.
(b) The Land Use Intensity table describes the types of proposed land use that
can result in high, moderate, and low levels of impacts to adjacent
wetlands.
Page 313 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 124
Table 29.01.520 (8)(b): Land Use Intensity Table
Level of
Impact from
Proposed
Land Use Types of Land Use
High
• Commercial
• Urban
• Industrial
• Institutional
• Mixed-use developments
• Residential (more than one unit/acre)
• Roads: federal and state highways, including on-ramps and exits, state routes,
and other roads associated with high-impact land uses
• Railroads
• Agriculture with high-intensity activities (dairies, nurseries, greenhouses, growing
and harvesting crops requiring annual tilling, raising and maintaining animals, etc.
• Open/recreational space with high-intensity uses (golf courses, ball fields, etc.)
• Solar farms (utility scale)
Moderate
• Residential (1 unit/acre or less)
• Roads: Forest Service roads and roads associated with moderate impact land uses
• Open/recreational space with moderate-intensity uses (parks with paved trails or
playgrounds, biking, jogging, etc.)
• Agriculture with moderate-intensity uses (orchards, hay fields, light or rotational
grazing, etc.)
• Utility corridor or right-of-way used by one or more utilities and including
access/maintenance
• Wind farm
Low
•
• Natural resource lands (forestry/silviculture–cutting of trees only, not land
clearing and removing stumps)
• Open/recreational space with low-intensity uses (unpaved trails, hiking,
birdwatching, etc.)
• Utility corridor without a maintenance road and little or no vegetation
management
• Cell tower
(c) Measuring Buffer Dimensions. Wetland buffers shall be measured
horizontally in a landward direction from the delineated wetland edge.
(d) Wetlands Adjacent to Slopes. Where lands adjacent to a wetland display a
continuous slope of 25% or greater, the buffer shall include such sloping
areas. Where the horizontal distance of the sloping area is greater than the
Page 314 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 125
required standard buffer, the buffer shall be extended to a point 25 feet
beyond the top of the bank of the sloping area.
(9) Buffer Width Modifications:
(a) Administrative Buffer Width Averaging. The required buffer widths
established in this SMP may be modified by the Shoreline Administrator
for a development on existing legal lots of record in place at the time of
adoption of this SMP.
(i) Buffer widths may be modified in accordance with the provisions
of this section only where the applicant demonstrates all of the
following:
(A) Averaging is necessary to avoid an extraordinary hardship
to the applicant caused by circumstances peculiar to the
property;
(B) The designated buffer area contains variations in sensitivity
to ecological impacts due to existing physical
characteristics or the character of the buffer varies in slope,
soils, or vegetation;
(C) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is
no less than that contained within the standard buffer prior
to averaging;
(D) The minimum buffer width at its narrowest point shall not
be less than 75% of the required buffer width established
under this SMP; and
(E) The buffer width averaging does not result in a net loss of
ecological function.
(b) Wetland Buffer Reductions.
(i) For wetlands that score moderate or high for habitat function, the
width of the buffer can be reduced if the following criteria are met:
(A) A relatively undisturbed vegetative corridor of at least
100 feet in width is protected between the wetland and any
other priority habitats; and
(B) The protected area is preserved by means of easement,
covenant or other measure; and
(C) Measures identified in PMC 29.01.520 (9)(b)(ii)(A) are
taken to minimize the impact of any proposed land use.
Page 315 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 126
(ii) For wetlands that score low for habitat function, the buffer width
can be reduced to that required for moderate land-use impacts by
applying the following measures to minimize the impacts of the
proposed land uses:
(A) Wetland buffers may be administratively modified based
on reducing the intensity of impacts from land uses. Buffer
widths required for high-intensity land uses may be reduced
to those required for moderate land use intensity under the
following conditions:
• Direct lights away from the wetland and buffer.
• Locate activities that that generate noise away from the
wetland and buffer.
• Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within
200 feet of a wetland.
• Implement integrated pest-management programs.
• Infiltrate or treat, detain and disperse runoff into buffer.
• Post signs at the outer edge of the critical area or buffer
to clearly indicate the location of the critical area
according to the direction of the City.
• Plant buffer with native vegetation appropriate for the
region to create screens or barriers to noise, light, and
human intrusion, as well as to discourage domestic
animal intrusion.
• Use low-impact development where appropriate.
• Establish a permanent conservation easement to protect
the wetland and the associated buffer.
(10) Compensatory Mitigation. As a condition of any development permit or
approval, which results in on-site loss or degradation of regulated wetlands
and/or wetland buffers, the City may require the applicant to provide
compensatory mitigation to ensure no net loss of ecological function and to
offset impacts resulting from the actions of the applicant. The following
standards shall apply:
(a) The mitigation shall be conducted on property that shall be protected and
managed to avoid further loss or degradation. The applicant shall provide
for long-term preservation of the mitigation area.
Page 316 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 127
(b) Mitigation ratios shall be consistent with the following entitled
Washington State Department of Ecology manual; Wetland Mitigation in
Washington State, Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance (Version 2,
Publication #21-06-003,April 2021) and Wetland Mitigation in
Washington State, Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans (Version 1,
Publication #06-06-011b, March 2006). See Table 29.01.520 (13),
Wetland Mitigation Ratios (for Eastern Washington).
(c) Mitigation shall follow an approved mitigation plan and reflect the
restoration/creation ratios specified above.
(d) The applicant shall enter into a wetland mitigation monitoring agreement
with the City as a condition of approval. The monitoring program will
continue for at least 8 years from the date of plant installation. Monitoring
will continue for 10 years where woody vegetation (forested or shrub
wetlands) is the intended result.
These communities take at least 8 years after planting to reach 80%
canopy closure. Reporting for a 10-year monitoring period shall occur in
years 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10. Monitoring in all instances shall be bonded.
Reporting results of the monitoring data to the City is the responsibility of
the applicant.
(e) Mitigation shall be completed prior to or concurrently with, wetland loss,
or, in the case of an enforcement action, prior to continuation of the
activity by the applicant.
(f) On-site mitigation is generally preferred over off-site mitigation.
(g) Off-site mitigation allows replacement of wetlands away from the site on
which the wetland has been impacted by a regulated activity. Off-site
mitigation will be conducted in accordance with the restoration/creation
ratios described above and in Table 29.01.520 (13), Wetland Mitigation
Ratios (for Eastern Washington). Off-site mitigation shall occur within the
same drainage basin as the wetland loss occurs, provided that Category IV
wetlands may be replaced outside of the watershed if there is no
reasonable alternative. Off-site mitigation may be permitted where:
(i) On-site mitigation is not feasible due to hydrology, soils, or other
factors.
(ii) On-site mitigation is not practical due to probable adverse impacts
from surrounding land uses or would conflict with a federal, state,
or local public safety directive.
(iii) Potential functional values at the site of the proposed restoration
are greater than the lost wetland functional values.
Page 317 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 128
(h) When the wetland to be altered is of a limited functional value and is
degraded, mitigation shall be of the wetland community types needed
most in the location of mitigation and those most likely to succeed with
the highest functional value possible.
(i) Except in the case of cooperative mitigation projects in selecting
mitigation sites, applicants shall pursue locations in the following order of
preference:
(i) Filled, drained, or cleared sites that were formerly wetlands and
where appropriate hydrology exists.
(ii) Upland sites, adjacent to wetlands, if the upland is significantly
disturbed and does not contain a mature forested or shrub
community of native species, and where the appropriate natural
hydrology exists.
(j) Where out-of-kind replacement is accepted, greater restoration/creation
ratios may be required.
(k) Construction of mitigation projects shall be timed to reduce impacts to
existing wildlife and plants. Construction shall be timed to ensure grading
and soil movement occurs during the dry season, and planting of
vegetation shall be specifically timed to the needs of target species.
(11) Innovative Mitigation:
(a) One or more applicants, or an organization may undertake a mitigation
project together if it is demonstrated that all of the following
circumstances exist:
(i) Creation of one or several larger wetlands may be preferable to
many small wetlands;
(ii) The group demonstrates the organizational and fiscal capability to
act cooperatively;
(iii) The group demonstrates that long-term management of the
mitigation area will be provided; and
(iv) There is a clear potential for success of the proposed mitigation at
the identified mitigation site.
(b) Wetland mitigation and banking programs shall be consistent with the
provisions outlined in the Department of Ecology's publication Wetland
Mitigation in Washington State, Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance
(Version 1, Publication #06-06-011a, March 2006) and Wetland
Page 318 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 129
Mitigation in Washington State, Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans
(Version 1, Publication #06-06-01b, March 2006).
(i) Credits from a wetland mitigation bank may be approved for use as
compensation for unavoidable impacts to wetlands when:
(A) The bank is certified under WAC 173-700;
(B) The Shoreline Administrator determines the wetland
mitigation bank provides appropriate compensation for the
authorized impacts; and
(C) The proposed use of credits is consistent with the terms and
conditions of the bank's certification.
(ii) Replacement ratios for projects using bank credits shall be
consistent with replacement ratios specified in the bank's
certification.
(iii) Credits from a certified wetland mitigation bank may be used to
compensate for impacts located within the service area specified in
the bank's certification. In some cases, the service area of the bank
may include portions of more than one adjacent drainage basin for
specific wetland functions.
(12) Mitigation Exceptions. Requirements for mitigation do not apply when a
wetland alteration is intended exclusively for the enhancement or restoration of
an existing regulated wetland, and the proposal will not result in a loss of
wetland function and value, subject to the following conditions:
(a) The enhancement or restoration project shall not be associated with a
development activity.
(b) A restoration plan shall be prepared and approved as described in
PMC 29.01.520 (12).
(13) Restoration. Restoration is required when a wetland or its buffer has been
altered in violation of SMP, Article V, Critical Areas. The following minimum
performance standards shall be met for the restoration of a wetland, provided
that if it can be demonstrated by the applicant that greater functional and habitat
values can be obtained, these standards may be modified:
(a) The original wetland configuration should be replicated, including depth,
width, and length at the original location.
(b) The original soil types and configuration shall be replicated.
Page 319 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 130
(c) The wetland, including buffer areas, shall be replanted with native
vegetation, which replicates the original species, sizes, and densities.
(d) The original functional values shall be restored, including water quality and
wildlife habitat functions.
(e) Required replacement ratios are shown in the Re-establishment or Creation
column of Table 29.01.520 (13), Wetland Mitigation Ratios (for Eastern
Washington).
(f) A restoration plan shall be prepared and approved prior to commencement
of restoration work. Such a plan shall be prepared by a qualified wetland
biologist and describe how the proposed actions meet the minimum
requirements described above. The Shoreline Administrator shall, at the
applicant's expense, seek expert advice in determining the adequacy of the
Restoration Plan. Inadequate plans shall be returned to the applicant for
revision and resubmittal.
(14) Wetland mitigation ratios are provided in the Table 29.01.520 (13).
Page 320 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 131
Table 29.01.520 (13): Wetland Mitigation Ratios (for Eastern Washington)
Category
impacted
wetland
Re-
establishment
or Creation3 Rehabilitation Preservation4,5 Enhancement5
Category IV 1.5:1 3:1 6:1 6:1
Category III 2:1 4:1 8:1 8:1
Category II 3:1 6:1 12:1 12:1
Category I 4:1 8:1 16:1 16:1
Notes:
1Ratios reflect the amount of compensation:amount of impact.
2The category of impacted wetland is based on scores for functions. Compensation ratios in this table generally do
not apply when impacts involve a wetland whose category is based on special char acteristics. Compensation ratios
and options for impacts to these types of wetlands are discussed in Chapters 6B.5.1 to 6B.5.8.
3If proposing to combine re-establishment or creation with other methods of compensation, see Chapter 6B.4.2.
4All proposed preservation sites need to meet the preservation criteria listed in Chapter 5.2.3.1.
5Applicants proposing preservation only or enhancement only should also provide a Credit -Debit analysis. The
Credit-Debit analysis uses the Credit-Debit Method and includes the following: 1) Scoring Form(s) for wetland(s)
impacted (i.e., debits); 2) Scoring Form(s) for wetland(s) proposed as compensation (i.e., credits); 3) Debit
Worksheet(s); 4) Credit Worksheet(s); and 5) Summary of Credits and Debits.
Reference:
Washington State Department of Ecology, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region 10, April 2021. Wetland Mitigation in Washington State – Part 1: Agency Policies and
Guidance (Version 2). Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #21-06-003. Olympia, Washington.
E = Enhancement
R/C = Re-establishment or Creation
RH = Rehabilitation
29.01.530 Fish and Wildlife Habitat
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide a framework to evaluate the
development, design, and location of buildings to ensure critical fish and
wildlife habitat with the shoreline jurisdiction is preserved and protected, in
order to ensure no net loss of ecological function and avoid habitat
fragmentation. These regulations seek to protect critical habitat areas so
populations of endangered, threatened, and sensitive species are given
consideration during the shoreline development review process.
Page 321 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 132
(2) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Designation and Classification Criteria:
(a) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall include the following:
Table 29.01.530 (2)(a): Criteria for Classification of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas
Habitat Area Characteristic/Classification Source
(1) Areas with which state or federally designated endangered,
threatened, and sensitive species have a primary association WDFW, USFWS (NOAA)
(2) Naturally occurring under 20 acres in size and their submerged aquatic
beds that provide fish or wildlife habitat Ecology
(3) Waters of the state classified as fish and wildlife habitats under the
Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A, and WAC 365-190-080(5)(c)(v)
• Columbia River
• Snake River
WDNR, Ecology, WDFW, affected
Indian tribes
(4) State Natural Area Preserves and Natural Resource Conservation
Areas WDNR
(5) Habitat areas of local importance as determined by resolution of the
City Council. WDFW
(b) All areas within the City of Pasco’s shoreline jurisdiction meeting one or
more of these criteria are hereby designated as critical areas and are subject
to the provisions of this section.
(c) Mapping information sources for identification of fish and wildlife habitat
conservation areas include, but are not limited to:
(i) WDFW Priority Habitat and Species maps.
(ii) Wetlands mapped under the National Wetland Inventory by the
U.S. Department of Interior; USFWS.
(iii) WDFW/WDNR, Washington Rivers Inventory System maps.
(iv) Maps and reference documents in the City of Pasco SMP
Inventory, Analysis, and Characterization Report, as applicable.
(3) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Rating. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall be
rated as Primary or Secondary according to the criteria in this section.
Table 29.01.530 (3): Classification by Fish and Wildlife Areas
Page 322 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 133
Habitat Area Classification Source
Primary Habitats
Primary habitats are those areas that are valuable to fish and wildlife and support a wide
variety of species due to an undisturbed nature, diversity of plant species, and structure,
presence of water, or size, location or seasonal importance and which meet any of the
following qualifying criteria:
(1) The documented presence of species listed by the
federal government or State of Washington as
endangered, threatened, or sensitive.
WDFW, USFWS (NOAA)
(2) Those rivers identified as "Shorelines of the State"
under the City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program,
and streams within the shoreline jurisdiction.
Ecology
(3) Those wetlands identified as Category I Wetlands,
as defined in this title.
PMC 29.01.520 (3)
Wetland Rating (Classification)
Secondary Habitat
Secondary habitats are those which are valuable to wildlife and support a wide variety of
species due to: an undisturbed nature, diversity of plant species, structure, presence of
water, or size, location or seasonal importance but do not meet any of the qualifying
criteria listed in items 1 through 3 in the Primary Habitats above.
(4) Determination of Need for Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Detailed Study:
(a) A Detailed Study shall be required for any activity that is within 200 feet
of a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area.
(b) Due to the sensitive nature of certain species, the applicant shall notify the
City if the proposed activity will occur within 660 feet (1/8 of a mile) of a
Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area; the City may then contact appropriate
agencies and determine if a Detailed Study should be prepared, based on
the sensitivity of the site.
(c) The Shoreline Administrator shall require a Detailed Study of a habitat
area if the following indicators are present:
(i) The area is listed in the City's Critical Areas Map as a Fish and
Wildlife Habitat Area;
(ii) Documentation exists that shows that any of the classification
criteria listed in PMC 29.01.530 (3) are present, based on any of
the references listed in this section;
(iii) A qualified fish and wildlife biologist finds that habitat conditions
appropriate to meet one or more of the classification criteria listed
above in PMC 29.01.530 (3) exist; or
Page 323 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 134
(iv) The Shoreline Administrator possesses a reasonable belief that a
Fish and Wildlife Habitat may exist. Such reasonable belief shall
be supported by a site visit and subsequent consultation with a
qualified fish and wildlife biologist.
(5) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Detailed Study Requirements. If a Fish and
Wildlife Habitat Area Detailed Study is required, it shall include and/or meet
the following requirements in addition to the Basic Requirements identified in
PMC 29.01.510 (10).
(a) The Detailed Study shall be completed by a qualified Fish and Wildlife
biologist with expertise in assessing the relevant species and habitats.
Evidence of qualifications shall be provided with the Detailed Study.
(b) The site plan and map submitted shall be of a scale no smaller than
1 inch = 200 feet. The site plan shall indicate all Fish and Wildlife Habitat
Critical Areas, as determined by the criteria in PMC 29.01.530 (3), and
shall include the area within 200 feet of the subject property. The
applicant may prepare the site plan; however, it is subject to review by the
qualified fish and wildlife biologist. The extent and boundaries of the
habitat shall be determined by the qualified fish and wildlife biologist.
(c) A habitat description shall be included, including a habitat rating as
described in PMC 29.01.530 (3), and a statement of functions and values
providing information on the species in question and the associated plant
and animal communities. A complete list of species and special habitat
features shall be included.
(d) A regulatory analysis shall be included, including a discussion of any
federal, state, tribal, and/or local requirements or special management
recommendations developed specifically for species and/or habitats
located on the site.
(e) The proposed mitigation plan shall address how the proposed development
activity has been mitigated to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the
habitat and shall follow the general mitigation plan requirements described
in PMC 29.01.530 (13).
(f) A statement of management and maintenance practices shall be included,
including a discussion of ongoing maintenance practices that will ensure
protection of all fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas on-site after
the project has been completed.
(g) Habitat and Buffer Recommendation.
(i) Riparian habitat areas: For the protection of habitat along rivers,
the buffer widths provided in Table 29.01.210 (2), Shoreline
Development Standards Matrix apply.
Page 324 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 135
(h) Habitats and species that have been identified as Priority Species or
Priority Habitats by the WDFW Priority Habitats and Species Program
should not be reduced and shall be preserved through regulation,
acquisition, incentives, and other techniques.
(6) Performance Standards Minimum Requirements. This section describes the
minimum performance standard requirements for habitat areas, including
riparian habitats, anadromous salmonids, and specific requirements for bald
eagle habitat areas.
(a) Riparian Habitats:
(i) Buffer Requirements. Native vegetation standard buffers for
activities occurring adjacent to streams within Fish and Wildlife
Habitat Areas shall be maintained. Buffer widths shall be based on
the extent of prior stream channel modification. Riparian buffers
are determined by whether or not a salmonid habitat is present.
(ii) The buffer distance from the OHWM are provided in
Table 29.01.210 (2), Shoreline Development Standards Matrix
apply.
(b) Bald Eagle Habitat. Bald eagle habitat shall be protected pursuant to the
Washington State Bald Eagle Protection Rules (WAC 232-12-292). A
Habitat Management Plan shall be developed by the applicant in
coordination with the WDFW whenever activities that alter habitat are
proposed near a verified nest territory or communal roost.
(c) Wetland Habitat. All habitat sites containing wetlands shall conform to the
wetland development performance standards set forth in PMC 29.01.520,
Wetlands, and shall conform to the wetland mitigation and restoration
provisions set forth in PMC 29.01.520 (9) through (13).
(d) Anadromous Salmonids:
(i) Activities, uses, and alterations proposed to be located in
waterbodies used by anadromous salmonids, or in areas that affect
such waterbodies, shall give special consideration to the
preservation and enhancement of anadromous salmonid habitat,
including, but not limited to, the following:
(A) Activities shall be timed to occur only during the allowable
work window, as designated by the WDFW;
(B) The activity is designed so that it will minimize the
degradation of the functions or values of the fish habitat or
other critical areas; and
Page 325 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 136
(C) Any impact on the functions and values of the habitat
conservation area are mitigated in accordance with an
approved Detailed Study.
(ii) Structures that prevent the migration of anadromous salmonids
shall not be allowed in the portion of the waterbodies currently
used by salmonids. Fish bypass facilities shall be provided that
allow the upstream migration of adult fish and prevent juveniles
migrating downstream from being trapped or harmed.
(iii) Fills waterward of the OHWM, when authorized, shall minimize
the adverse impacts on anadromous salmonids and their habitat,
shall mitigate any unavoidable impacts, and shall only be allowed
for water-dependent uses or for uses that enable public access or
recreation for significant numbers of the public.
(7) Buffer Width Modifications:
(a) Administrative Buffer Width Averaging. The required buffer widths
established in this SMP may be modified by the Shoreline Administrator
for a development on existing legal lots of record in place at the time of
adoption of this SMP, in accordance with the provisions of this section
only where the applicant demonstrates all of the following:
(i) Averaging is necessary to avoid an extraordinary hardship to the
applicant caused by circumstances peculiar to the property;
(ii) The designated buffer area contains variations in sensitivity to
ecological impacts due to existing physical characteristics or the
character of the buffer varies in slope, soils, or vegetation;
(iii) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less
than that contained within the standard buffer prior to averaging;
(iv) The minimum buffer width at its narrowest point shall not be less
than 75% of the required buffer width established under this SMP;
and
(v) The buffer width averaging does not result in a net loss of
ecological function.
(b) Exception for Lots Adjacent to Pre-Existing Development. The required
Riparian buffer width listed above shall not apply in cases where the
adjacent pre-existing development (vested prior to the effective date of
this section) does not meet these established standards. In such cases, the
buffer may be reduced by one-third the difference between the required
buffer and the larger of the two adjacent buffers.
Page 326 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 137
Adjacency in this situation shall be defined as being within 50 feet of the
side property lines. If there is only clearing on one side of the proposed
activity within 50 feet of the side property line, then the buffer can be
reduced as described above.
(c) Shoreline Buffer Reductions. Shoreline buffers may be administratively
modified as outlined below:
(i) Where a legally established road or railway, or other type of
continuous development crosses or extends along a shoreline or
critical area buffer and is wider than 20 feet, the
Shoreline Administrator may approve a modification of the
minimum required buffer width to the waterward edge of the
improved continuous development provided the upland side of the
continuous development area:
(A) Does not provide additional protection of the shoreline
waterbody or stream; and
(B) Provides little (less than 20%) to no biological, geological,
or hydrological buffer functions relating to the riparian and
upland portions of the buffer.
(ii) Standard Buffer Reduction. Reductions of up to 75% of the
standard required buffer may be approved if the applicant
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Shoreline Administrator that
a mitigation plan developed by a qualified professional pursuant to
PMC 29.01.510 (13) indicates that enhancing the buffer (by
removing invasive plants or impervious surfaces, planting native
vegetation, installing habitat features, or other means) will result in
a reduced buffer that functions at a higher level than the existing
standard buffer.
(8) Allowed uses in Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas and stream buffers:
(a) Roads, bridges, and utilities. Road, bridge, and utility maintenance, repair,
and construction may be permitted across a Fish and Wildlife Habitat
Conservation Area and/or buffers under the following conditions:
(i) It is demonstrated to the Shoreline Administrator that there are no
alternative routes that can be reasonably used to achieve the
proposed development;
(ii) The activity will have minimum adverse impact to the Fish and
Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area;
(iii) The activity will not significantly degrade surface or groundwater;
and
Page 327 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 138
(iv) The intrusion into the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area
and its buffers is fully mitigated to achieve no net loss of
ecological functions.
(b) Limited park or recreational access to a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area
and/or stream buffers, provided that all of the following are satisfied:
(i) The access is part of a public park or a recreational resort
development that is dependent on the access for its location and
recreational function;
(ii) The access is limited to the minimum necessary to accomplish the
recreational function; and
(iii) The intrusion is fully mitigated to achieve no net loss of ecological
functions.
(c) Low-impact uses and activities that are consistent with the purpose and
function of the stream setback and do not detract from its integrity.
Examples of low-impact uses and activities include removal of noxious
vegetation and stormwater management facilities such as grass-lined
swales.
(9) Additional Protection Measures:
(a) Temporary and permanent erosion and sedimentation controls shall be
provided to prevent the introduction of sediments or pollutants to
waterbodies or watercourses within the habitat area.
(b) Clearing and grading shall be limited to that necessary for establishment
of the use or development and shall be conducted to avoid significant
adverse impacts and minimize the alteration of the volume, rate, or
temperature of freshwater flows to or within the habitat area and any
buffer required by this section.
(c) The proposed development shall not discharge hazardous substances to the
habitat area that would have significant adverse impacts on that area.
(d) Stream flows shall be protected from changes to the normal flow,
temperature, turbidity, and discharge to the maximum extent practicable.
(e) Septic drainfields and any required replacement drainfield area shall be at
least 100 feet from the edge of any habitat area.
(f) Exceptions to the above protection standards may be allowed by the
Shoreline Administrator based on a special report prepared by a
Qualified Biological Professional that demonstrates that such exception
Page 328 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 139
would not adversely impact the habitat system, functions, and values of
the habitat area.
(g) Activities may only be permitted in a stream or stream buffer if the
applicant can show that the proposed activity will not degrade the
functions and values of the stream, stream buffer, or other critical area.
(h) Stream Crossings. Stream crossings shall be minimized, but when
necessary, they shall conform to the applicable provisions of this SMP and
other laws (see WDFW or Ecology).
(i) Stormwater conveyance facilities. Stormwater conveyance facilities may
be permitted, provided that they are only located in the buffer when no
practicable alternative exists outside the buffer. Stormwater facilities shall
be planted with native plantings where feasible to provide habitat, and/or
less intrusive facilities should be used.
(j) Floodway-dependent Structures. Floodway-dependent structures or
installations may be permitted within streams or their buffers if allowed or
approved by other ordinances or other agencies with jurisdiction. See
PMC 29.01.550, Flood Hazard Areas, for more information on allowed
uses and activities within flood hazard areas.
(k) Trails. The criteria for alignment, construction, and maintenance of trails
within wetlands and their buffers shall apply to trails within stream
buffers. Outer buffer trails may not exceed 20 feet in width and may be
constructed with impermeable surface materials if on-site infiltration is
utilized.
(l) Utilities. The criteria for alignment, construction, and maintenance within
the wetland buffers and PMC 29.01.460, Utilities, shall apply to utility
corridors within stream buffers. In addition, corridors shall not be aligned
parallel with any stream channel unless the corridor is outside the buffer,
and crossings shall be minimized. Installation shall be accomplished by
boring beneath the scour depth and hyporheic zone of the waterbody
where feasible. Crossings shall be contained within the existing footprint
of an existing or new road or utility crossing where possible. Otherwise,
crossings shall be at an angle greater than 60 degrees to the centerline of
the channel. The criteria for stream crossings shall also apply.
(m) Native vegetation landscaping schemes shall be provided that do not
require application of herbicides, pesticides, or fertilizer to maintain robust
growth.
(n) No net-effective impervious surfaces may be created in the outer buffer
area beyond what is otherwise permitted.
Page 329 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 140
(o) No structures or related improvements, including buildings or decks, shall
be permitted within the stream buffer, except as otherwise allowed in
PMC 29.01.510, General Provisions, or in this SMP.
29.01.540 Aquifer Recharge Areas
(1) Purpose. The purpose and intent of this section is to safeguard groundwater
resources within the shoreline jurisdiction from hazardous substance and
hazardous waste pollution by controlling or abating future pollution from new
land uses or activities.
(2) Aquifer Recharge Area Designation Criteria:
(a) Aquifer recharge areas shall be classified as following:
Page 330 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 141
Table 29.01.540 (2)(a): Designation of Aquifer Recharge Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area Characteristic/Designation Source
(1) Wellhead Protection Areas pursuant to WAC 246-290 WA Department of Health,
US Environmental Protection Agency
(2) Areas designated for special protection pursuant to a groundwater
management program, RCW 90.44, 90.48, and 90.54 and
WAC 173-100 and 173-200
Ecology
(3) Areas overlying unprotected aquifers. Such aquifers shall be
identified through any existing competent hydrogeologic study USGS, WDNR
(4) Areas within identified unprotected aquifers but possessing the
following characteristics:
• Slopes less than 15%
• Coarse alluvium or sand and gravel in the soil profile and no
known impermeable layers
WDFW
(b) Any project area located within 200 feet of an area meeting the aquifer
designation or soil classification criteria, or mapped as such, shall be
treated as if it is located within the mapped area.
(c) All areas within the City of Pasco meeting these criteria, regardless of the
presence or lack of any formal identification as such, are hereby
designated as critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this Title.
(3) Aquifer Recharge Area Classification:
(a) Aquifer recharge areas are classified as high, moderate, or low
significance aquifer recharge areas according to the following criteria:
Page 331 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 142
Table 29.01.540 (3)(a): Classification of Aquifer Vulnerability
Vulnerability Classification Documentation and Data Sources
High Vulnerability High significance aquifer recharge areas are areas with slopes of less than
15% underlain by coarse alluvium or sand and gravel
Moderate Vulnerability
Moderate significance aquifer recharge areas are:
(1) Areas with slopes of less than 15% underlain by fine alluvium, silt,
clay, glacial till, or deposits from the electron mudflow
(2) Areas with slopes of 15% to 30% underlain by sand and gravel
Low Vulnerability
Moderate significance aquifer recharge areas are:
(1) Areas with slopes of 15% to 30% underlain by silt, clay, or glacial till
(2) Areas with slopes greater than 30%
(4) Determination of Need for Aquifer Recharge Detailed Study:
(a) The following information resources shall be utilized along with other
documentation where noted:
(i) Studies from the USGS.
(ii) City of Pasco Wastewater Facility Plan.
(iii) Soil Survey for Franklin County (Conservation District).
(b) Requirements for High Significance Aquifer Recharge Area. An Aquifer
Recharge Area Detailed Study shall be required for any activity occurring
on or adjacent to a site that is, or contains, a High Significance Aquifer
Recharge Area if the activity involves one or more of the following uses:
(i) Hazardous substance processing or handling;
(ii) Hazardous waste treatment and storage facility;
(iii) Disposal of on-site sewage for subdivisions, short plats, and
commercial and industrial sites; or
(iv) Landfills.
(5) Aquifer Recharge Area Detailed Study. When required as described in
PMC 29.01.540 (4), an Aquifer Recharge Area Detailed Study shall meet the
following requirements:
(a) The Detailed Study shall be prepared by qualified professional with
experience in preparing hydrogeologic assessments. Evidence of these
qualifications shall be provided with the Detailed Study.
Page 332 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 143
(b) The Detailed Study shall contain a map, of a scale no smaller than 1 inch =
200 feet, of the site and the extent of the High Significance Aquifer
Recharge Area as determined by the criteria in PMC 29.01.540 (2).
(c) The Detailed Study shall contain a hydrogeologic assessment, including,
at a minimum:
(i) Information sources;
(ii) Geologic setting;
(iii) Background water quality;
(iv) Location of, and depth to, water tables;
(v) Recharge potential of the facility site;
(vi) Groundwater flow direction and gradient;
(vii) Currently available data on wells within 1,000 feet of the site;
(viii) Currently available data on springs within 1,000 feet of the site;
(ix) Surface water location and recharge potential;
(x) Water source supply to the activity (e.g., high capacity well);
(xi) Any sampling schedules necessary;
(xii) Discussion of the effects of the proposed project on the
groundwater resource; and
(xiii) Other information as may be required by the Town.
(d) The Detailed Study shall include a mitigation plan detailing how the
activity will offset any impact on the resource and control risk of
contamination to the aquifer.
(6) Aquifer Recharge Area Detailed Study Special Exemptions. In addition to the
exemptions listed in PMC 29.01.510 (3) and 29.01,770, Exemptions for
Shoreline Substantial Development Permits, sewer lines and appurtenances shall
be exempt from the requirement to prepare an Aquifer Recharge Area Detailed
Study.
(7) Performance Standards Basic Requirements:
(a) Any activity listed in PMC 29.01.540 (4)(b) may only be permitted in a
High Significance Aquifer Recharge Area if the Detailed Study documents
Page 333 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 144
that the activity does not pose a threat to the aquifer system and the
proposed activity will not cause contaminants to enter the aquifer.
(b) All activities located in an Aquifer Recharge Area shall minimize the
creation of impervious surfaces to the extent practicable without creating a
greater risk to the aquifer recharge area.
(8) Storage Tanks. All Storage tanks located in an Aquifer Recharge Area must
conform to the following requirements. Ecology also regulates and authorizes
permits for underground storage tanks (WAC 173-360).
(a) Underground Tanks. All new underground storage facilities used or to be
used for the underground storage of hazardous substances or hazardous
wastes shall be designed and constructed so as to:
(i) Prevent releases due to corrosion or structural failure for the
operational life of the tank;
(ii) Be protected against corrosion, constructed of noncorrosive
material, steel clad with a noncorrosive material, or designed to
include a secondary containment system to prevent the release or
threatened release of any stored substances; and,
(iii) Use material in the construction or lining of the tank that is
compatible with the substance to be stored.
(b) Aboveground Tanks:
(i) No new aboveground storage facility or part thereof shall be
fabricated, constructed, installed, used, or maintained in any
manner which may allow the release of a hazardous substance to
the soil, groundwater, or surface waters within an
Aquifer Recharge Area.
(ii) No new aboveground tank or part thereof shall be fabricated,
constructed, installed, used, or maintained without having
constructed around or under it an impervious containment area
enclosing or underlying the tank or part thereof.
(iii) New aboveground tanks will require a secondary containment
system, either built into the tank structure or a dike system built
outside the tank, for all tanks located within an aquifer recharge
area.
29.01.550 Flood Hazard Areas
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to promote the public health, safety, and
welfare of the community by recognizing potential hazards that may be caused
Page 334 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 145
by development in areas where severe flooding is anticipated to occur. The
intent of this section is to assist with minimizing public and private losses due to
flood hazards by avoiding development in hazard areas within the shoreline
jurisdiction and or implementing protective measures contained in this SMP.
(2) Classification. The following categories of frequently flooded areas are
established for the purposes of classification:
(a) Floodway. Floodways are defined as the channel of a stream and adjacent
land areas, which are required to carry and discharge flood waters or flood
flows of any river or stream associated with a regulatory flood.
(b) Special Flood Hazard Areas. The area adjoining the floodway, which is
subject to a 1% or greater chance of flooding in any given year and
determined by the Federal Insurance Administration.
(c) Floodplain. The floodway and special flood hazard areas.
These flood areas have been delineated based on studies completed by FEMA for
the national Flood Insurance Program.
(3) Designation:
(a) All areas within the City meeting the frequently flooded designation
criteria of PMC 29.01.550 (2) are hereby designated critical areas and are
subject to the provisions of this section.
(b) The approximate location and extent of frequently flooded areas are
shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) prepared for the City
of Pasco and Franklin County by FEMA, as part of the National Flood
Insurance Program.
(4) Management. Title 16 (Buildings and Construction) and Chapter 24.20
(Flood Hazard Protection) of the PMC regulate proposed activities in all areas
of special flood hazards. If allowed, any structures permitted in the designated
flood areas are subject to the flood-proofing regulations provided in Title 16 and
Chapter 24.20.
(5) Floodways. Special flood hazard areas established in this section are areas that
are extremely hazardous due to the velocity of flood waters, which carry debris,
potential projectiles, and erosion potential. The following provisions apply to
special flood hazard areas:
(a) Prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial
improvements, and other development unless certification by a registered
professional engineer or architect is provided demonstrating that
encroachments shall not result in an increase in flood levels during the
occurrence of the base flood discharge.
Page 335 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 146
(b) If PMC 29.01.550 (5)(a) is satisfied, all new construction and substantial
improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction
provisions of PMC 24.20.
29.01.560 Geologic Hazard Areas
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to reduce the threats to public health and
safety posed by geologic hazards within the shoreline jurisdiction. The intent is
to reduce incompatible development in areas of significant geologic hazard.
Development incompatible with geologic hazards may not only place itself at
risk, but also may increase the hazard to surrounding development. Some
geologic hazards can be reduced or mitigated by engineering, design, or
modified construction or altering mining practices so risks to health and safety
are minimized. When technology cannot reduce the risks to acceptable levels,
development in the hazard area is best to be avoided.
(2) Geologic Hazard Area Designation. Geologic hazard areas within the City are
those areas that are susceptible to significant erosion, landslide, flood hazards,
seismic hazards, and surface mine collapse hazards. All areas within the City of
Pasco meeting the criteria described in PMC 29.01.560 (3) for known or
suspected risk or unknown risk, regardless of the presence or lack of any formal
identification as such, are designated as critical areas and are subject to the
provisions of this section.
(a) Volcanic Hazards. The GMA requires that volcanic hazards be addressed
in local Critical Area Regulations. However, since no volcanic hazards
exist in the City area, no volcanic hazards regulations are needed.
(b) Flood Hazard Areas. Generally, areas subject to flood hazard conditions
are regulated by PMC 29.01.550 and the City of Pasco Flood Plain
regulations (PMC Title 24) which regulates those areas identified and
classified by the FEMA on their Flood Hazard Boundary/Flood Insurance
Rate Maps.
(3) Geologic Hazard Area Classification and Designation Criteria:
(a) Geologic hazard area classification criteria are listed in the table below,
along with the source agencies that provide the guidelines for
classification and designation:
Page 336 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 147
Table 29.01.560 (3)(a): Criteria for Classification of Geologic Hazard Areas
Hazard Area Classification and Designation Source
(1) Erosion Hazard
Areas
(a) Areas with soil type possessing erosion hazard of
"moderate to severe," "severe," or "very severe."
(Classification based on both soil type and slope)
NRCS
(2) Landslide Hazard
Areas
(a) Areas with slopes of 30% or greater slope and with a
vertical relief of 10 or more feet; NRCS
(b) Areas with slopes steeper than 15% on hillsides
intersecting geologic contacts with a relatively
permeable sediment overlying a relatively
impermeable sediment or bedrock where springs or
groundwater seepage is present;
NRCS
(c) Areas with slopes parallel or sub-parallel to planes of
weakness in subsurface materials (e.g., bedding
planes, joint systems, and fault planes);
NRCS
(d) Areas with slopes having gradients steeper than 80%
subject to rockfall during seismic shaking; NRCS
(e) Alluvial fans or canyon bottoms presently or
potentially subject to inundation by debris flows or
catastrophic flooding;
NRCS
(f) Areas that have shown movement during the
Holocene epoch or which are underlain or covered by
wastage debris of this epoch;
NRCS
(g) Evidence of or risk from snow avalanches; NRCS
(h) A "severe" limitation for building site development
due to slope conditions; NRCS
(i) Areas of historic failure such as areas designated as
quaternary slumps, earthflows, mudflows, lahars, or
landslides on maps or technical reports (e.g.,
topographic or geologic maps, or other authorized
documents).
USGS, WDNR, or
other government
agencies
(3) Flood Hazard Areas
(a) Areas potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream
incision, stream bank erosion, and Undercutting by
wave action shall be addressed as a flood hazard
PMC Title 24
Note:
NRCS = U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service
(4) Geologic Hazard Area Rating Criteria. All areas within the City shall be
classified by the following risk categories for each geologic hazard type:
Page 337 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 148
Table 29.01.560 (4): Rating of Geologic Hazard Risk
Risk Classification Documentation and Data Sources
Known or Suspected Risk Documentation or projection of the hazard by a qualified expert exists
No Risk Documentation or projection of the lack of a hazard by a qualified expert exists
Risk Unknown Data are not available to determine the presence or absence of a geologic hazard
(5) Determination of Need for Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study. A
Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study of a geologic hazard area shall be
required if the following indicators are present:
(a) If the project area is listed in the City of Pasco Critical Areas Map as
possessing either a Known or Suspected Risk for erosion, landslide, flood,
seismic, or mine hazard.
(b) If the project area is listed in the City of Pasco Critical Areas Map as
possessing an Unknown Risk for erosion, landslide, flood, seismic, or
mine hazard if any of the following are identified by the applicant or City:
(i) A qualified geologist finds that any of the following exist:
evidence of past significant events of the hazard in question on or
adjacent to the site; the presence of necessary and sufficient factors
for events of the hazard in question on or adjacent to the site; or
reasonable uncertainty concerning the hazard the potential for
significant risk to or from the proposed activity; or
(ii) The Shoreline Administrator possesses a reasonable belief that a
geologic hazard may exist. Such reasonable belief shall be
supported by a site visit and subsequent consultation with a
qualified geologist.
(6) Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study Requirements. The minimum
requirements for a Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study include the following
in addition to the Basic Requirements identified in PMC 29.01.510 (10):
(a) Basic Requirements. A Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study shall meet
the following:
(i) The Detailed Study shall be prepared by a qualified professional
engineer or geologist. Evidence of qualifications shall be provided
with the Detailed Study.
(ii) A map, of a scale no smaller than 1 inch = 200 feet, of the site and
the extent of the geologic hazard area as determined by the criteria
in PMC 29.01.560 (3).
Page 338 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 149
(iii) An assessment of the geologic characteristics and engineering
properties of the soils, sediments, and/or rock of the subject
property and potentially affected adjacent properties, and a review
of the site history regarding landslides, erosion, and prior grading.
The Study shall include a soils analysis consistent with the
accepted regional taxonomic classification system, and a
description of the vulnerability of the site to seismic events.
Documentation of data and methods shall be included.
(iv) A geotechnical analysis, including a detailed description of the
proposed project, its relationship to the geologic hazard(s), and its
potential impact upon the hazard area, the subject property and
affected adjacent properties shall be included.
(v) A mitigation plan, if appropriate, prepared by a professional
engineer or geologist under the supervision of a professional
engineer qualified to prepare a Detailed Study. The mitigation plan
shall include a discussion on how the project has been designed to
avoid and minimize the impacts discussed in the geotechnical
analysis (see mitigation standards provided in PMC 29.01.510
(13)). The plan shall make a recommendation for the minimum
building setbacks from any geologic hazard based on the
geotechnical analysis. The plan shall also address the potential
benefit of mitigation on the hazard area, the subject property, and
affected adjacent properties.
(vi) Where more than one geologic hazard exists within, adjacent to,
impacts, or is impacted by the activity site, then only one Detailed
Study is required to be completed to conduct a geologic hazard
Critical Area Review of the activity. The Critical Area Review
report shall meet all of the requirements of each critical area type,
but may present a unified mitigation plan.
(vii) Where a valid geotechnical report has been prepared within the last
5 years for a specific site, and where the proposed land use activity
and surrounding site conditions are unchanged, said report may be
incorporated into the Detailed Study. The applicant shall submit a
geotechnical assessment detailing any changed environmental
conditions associated with the site.
(b) Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. In addition to the requirements of
PMC 29.01.560 (6)(a), an Erosion Hazard or Landslide Hazard Area
Detailed Study must also meet the following requirements:
(i) The map shall depict the height of slope, slope gradient, and cross
section of the site. The site plan shall also include the location of
springs, seeps, or other surface expressions of groundwater. The
Page 339 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 150
Site Plan shall also depict any evidence of surface or stormwater
runoff.
(ii) A description of load intensity, including surface and groundwater
conditions, public and private sewage disposal systems, fills and
excavations, and all structural development.
(iii) An estimate of slope stability and the effect construction and
placement of structures will have on the slope during the estimated
life of the structure.
(iv) An estimate of the bluff retreat rate that recognizes and reflects
potential catastrophic events such as seismic activity or a 100-year
storm event.
(v) An assessment describing the extent and type of vegetative cover.
(vi) The geotechnical analysis shall specifically include:
(A) Slope stability studies and opinion(s) of slope stability;
(B) Proposed angles of cut and fill slopes and site grading
requirements;
(C) Structural foundation requirements and estimated
foundation settlements;
(D) Soil compaction criteria;
(E) Proposed surface and subsurface drainage;
(F) Lateral earth pressures;
(G) Vulnerability of the site to erosion;
(H) Suitability of on-site soil for use as fill; and,
(I) Building limitations.
(vii) Mitigation proposals shall include the location and methods of
drainage, surface water management, locations, and methods of
erosion control, a vegetation management and/or restoration plan,
and/or other means for maintaining long-term stability of slopes.
(c) Flood Hazard Areas. Flood Hazard Areas are addressed through
PMC 29.01.550, Flood Hazard Areas, and the City of Pasco Floodplain
regulations (PMC Title 24). If evidence exists that the proposed
development area is subject to flood hazards that are not indicated on the
City's Flood Hazard Boundary Maps, and site characteristics do not
Page 340 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 151
warrant an Erosion or Landslide Hazard Detailed Study, the City may
require additional analysis and preparation of a mitigation plan to
determine if the site is suitable for development.
(d) Seismic Hazard Areas. In addition to the Basic Requirements
PMC 29.01.560 (6)(a)), a Detailed Study for a seismic hazard critical area
shall also meet the following requirements:
(i) The site map shall show all known and mapped faults in the project
vicinity.
(ii) The geotechnical analysis shall include a complete discussion of
the potential impacts of seismic activity reasonably probable on the
site (e.g., forces generated and fault displacement).
(e) Mine Hazard Areas. In addition to the Basic Requirements
PMC 29.01.560 (6)(a), a Detailed Study for a mine hazard critical area
shall also meet the following requirements:
(i) The site plan shall delineate the existence of mine workings
adjacent to or abutting the site, or nearby mine workings, which
may impact the site; and
(ii) The geotechnical analysis shall include a discussion of the
potential for subsidence on the site.
(f) Volcanic Hazard Areas. The City is located in an area of minimal risk
from Volcanic Hazard Areas.
(7) Performance Standards Minimum Requirements. This section describes the
minimum performance standard requirements for Geologic Hazard Areas.
(a) Basic Requirements:
(i) Alteration of geologic hazard critical areas is permitted only if the
development proposal can be designed so the hazard to the project
and any increase of hazard to adjacent property is eliminated or
mitigated, and the development proposal on the site is certified as
safe by a geotechnical engineer licensed in the State of
Washington.
(ii) All proposals involving excavations and placement of fills shall be
subject to structural review under Chapter 33, Site Work,
Demolition and Construction, of the most current International
Building Code.
(iii) Essential public facilities as defined by RCW 36.70A.200 shall not
be sited within designated geologic hazard areas.
Page 341 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 152
(b) Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing
landslide or erosion hazards shall also meet the following requirements:
(i) Alterations of the buffer and/or geologic hazard area may only
occur for activities meeting the following criteria:
(A) No reasonable alternative exists; and
(B) A geotechnical report is submitted and certifies that:
• The development will not significantly increase
surface-water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent
properties beyond pre- development conditions;
• The development will not decrease slope stability on
adjacent properties; and
• That such alterations will not adversely impact other
critical areas.
(ii) A temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the standard specification of
the City of Pasco.
(iii) A drainage plan for the collection, transport, treatment, discharge
and/or recycle of water in accordance with the standard
specification of the City of Pasco.
(iv) Surface drainage shall not be directed across the face of a landslide
hazard area (including riverine bluffs or ravines). If drainage must
be discharged from the hazard area into adjacent waters, it shall be
collected above the hazard and directed to the water by a tight line
drain and provided with an energy dissipating device at the point
of discharge.
(v) All infiltration systems, such as stormwater detention and retention
facilities, and curtain drains utilizing buried pipe or French drain,
are prohibited in landslide hazard areas and their buffers unless a
geotechnical report indicates such facilities or systems or the
failure of the same will not affect slope stability and the systems
are designed by a licensed civil engineer.
(vi) A minimum standard buffer width of 30 feet shall be established
from the top, toe, and all edges of landslide and erosion hazard
areas. Existing native vegetation shall be maintained. The buffer
may be reduced to a minimum of 10 feet when an applicant
demonstrates the reduction will adequately protect the proposed
development, adjacent developments and uses, and the subject
Page 342 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 153
critical area. The buffer may be increased by the
Shoreline Administrator for development adjacent to a river bluff
or ravine, or in other areas that circumstances may warrant, where
it is determined a larger buffer is necessary to prevent risk of
damage to proposed and existing development as in the case where
the area potentially impacted by a landslide exceeds 30 feet.
(vii) On-site sewage disposal systems, including drain fields, shall be
prohibited within landslide and erosion hazard areas and related
buffers.
(viii) Development designs shall meet the following basic requirements,
unless it can be demonstrated that an alternative design provides
greater long-term slope stability while meeting all other criteria of
this section. The requirement for long-term slope stability shall
exclude designs that require periodic maintenance or other actions
to maintain their level of function. The basic development design
standards are:
(A) Structures and improvement shall be clustered to retain as
much open space as possible and to preserve the natural
topographic features of the site.
(B) Structures and improvements shall conform to the natural
contour of the slope, and foundations shall be tiered where
possible to conform to existing topography.
(C) Structures and improvements shall be located to preserve
the most critical portion of the site and its natural landforms
and vegetation.
(D) The use of retaining walls that allow the maintenance of
existing natural slope area is preferred over graded artificial
slopes.
(E) All development shall be designed to minimize impervious
lot coverage.
(c) Flood Hazard Areas. Activities in flood hazard areas shall comply with
PMC 29.01.550, Flood Hazard Areas, and the City of Pasco Floodplain
regulations (PMC Title 24).
(d) Seismic Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing seismic hazards shall
also meet the following requirements:
(i) Mitigation is implemented, which reduces the seismic risk to a
level equivalent to that which the activity would experience if it
were not located in a seismic hazard area.
Page 343 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 154
(ii) Structural development proposals shall meet all applicable
provisions of Chapter 16 of the most current addition of the
International Building Code (Structural Forces/Structural Design
Requirements).
(iii) No residential structures or Essential Public Facility shall be
located on a Holocene fault line as indicated by USGS
investigative maps and studies.
(e) Mine Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing mine hazards shall also
meet the following requirements:
(i) Mitigation is implemented which reduces the risk from mine
hazards to a level equivalent to that which the activity would
experience if it were not located in a mine hazard area.
(f) Volcanic Hazard Areas. No additional requirements.
(8) Long-term Mitigation and Restoration Standards:
(a) The mitigation plan shall specifically address how the activity maintains
or reduces the pre-existing level of risk to the site and adjacent properties
on a long-term basis (equal to or exceeding the projected lifespan of the
activity or occupation). Mitigation techniques providing long-term hazard
reduction are those that do not require periodic maintenance or other
actions to maintain their function.
(b) Mitigation may be required to avoid any increase in risk above the
pre-existing conditions following abandonment of the activity.
(c) Any required restoration shall meet the long-term hazard reduction
standards. In the case of restoration, long-term shall be defined as the
equivalent of natural function.
Page 344 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 155
Article VI. Existing Uses, Structures, and Lots
29.01.600 Applicability
(1) All nonconformances in shoreline jurisdiction shall be subject to the provisions
of this article. For nonconformance of use, structures, and lots within shoreline
critical areas, PMC 29.01, Article V, Critical Areas, applies. When there is a
conflict between this Section and the Critical Area Section as applicable to
critical areas, the more restrictive standards shall apply.
(2) The provisions of this SMP do not supersede or relieve a property owner from
compliance with:
(a) The requirements of the International Building and Fire Codes; or
(b) The provisions of the SMP beyond the specific nonconformance addressed
by this section.
(3) A change in the required permit review process (e.g., Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit versus a Shoreline Special Use Permit) shall not create a
nonconformance.
(4) Any nonconformance that is brought into conformance for any period of time
shall forfeit status as nonconformance, except as specified in PMC 29.01.610,
Nonconforming Uses.
(5) A nonconforming lot, use, or structure may be deemed legally nonconforming
by providing documentation that the use in question occurred prior to the
effective date of this SMP, from two of the following:
(a) Local agency permit;
(b) Orthophotograph, aerial photograph, or planimetric mapping recognized
as legitimate by the agency; or
(c) Tax record.
29.01.610 Nonconforming Uses
(1) If, at the effective date of the SMP and any amendment thereto, a lawful use of
land exists that is made no longer permissible under the terms of this SMP, or
amendments thereto, such use may be continued as a nonconforming use so
long as it remains otherwise lawful subject to the following conditions:
(a) No nonconforming use shall be intensified, enlarged, increased, or
extended to occupy a greater area of land than was occupied on the
effective date of the SMP or the amendment that made the use no longer
permissible. Provided that a nonconforming use may be enlarged,
Page 345 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 156
increased, or extended in conformance with applicable bulk and
dimensional standards of this SMP upon approval of a Shoreline Special
Use Permit.
(b) No nonconforming use shall be moved in whole or in part to any other
portion of the lot that contains the nonconforming use.
(c) If any nonconforming use of land ceases for any reason for a period of
1 year or more, any subsequent use of such land shall conform to the
regulations specified by this SMP for the use environment in which such
land is located.
(d) A structure, which is being or has been used for a nonconforming use,
may be used for a different nonconforming use only upon a finding that:
(i) No reasonable alternative conforming use is practical;
(ii) The proposed use is equally or more appropriate to the shoreline
environment than the existing nonconforming use, and is at least as
consistent with the policies and provisions of the act and the SMP;
and
(iii) Such a change of use shall be subject to a Shoreline Special Use
Permit approval. Conditions may be attached to the permit as are
deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the above findings
and the requirements of the SMP and the SMA, and to ensure the
use will not become a nuisance or a hazard.
29.01.620 Nonconforming Structures
(1) If, at the effective date of the SMP or any amendment thereto, a lawful structure
or other improvement exists, which is made no longer permissible under the
terms of this SMP or amendment thereto, such structure or other improvement
may be continued as a nonconforming structure or other improvement so long
as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the following conditions:
(a) No nonconforming structure or other improvement shall be altered or
changed in a way which increases its nonconformity except as allowed in
PMC 29.01.620 (1)(b).
(b) Expansions of structures that are nonconforming with respect to a required
shoreline buffer:
(i) May not encroach any farther waterward into the required
shoreline buffer.
(ii) Expansions parallel to or landward of shoreline may be allowed
provided that said enlargement does not increase the extent of
Page 346 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 157
nonconformity by farther encroaching upon or extending into areas
where construction or use would not be allowed for new
development or uses.
(c) All expansion, extension, maintenance, or repair activities of
nonconforming structures or improvements shall be consistent with all
other provisions of this SMP, provided the cumulative cost of such
maintenance or repair shall not exceed 20% of the assessed valuation of
such building, structure, or land (as applicable) at the time such
maintenance is completed.
(d) When damaged, a nonconforming structure may be restored to the
configuration existing immediately prior to the time that the structure was
damaged, provided that:
(i) The structure is damaged to an extent not exceeding 50% of the
replacement cost of the original development.
(ii) The applicant applies for permits needed to restore the
development within 6 months of the date the damage occurred.
(iii) Reconstruction is started within 12 months and is completed within
24 months of the date of damage, unless an extension of time is
granted by the Shoreline Administrator upon written petition
substantiating to the satisfaction of the Administrator due cause for
such extension.
(iv) The degree of the nonconforming use, building, or structure is not
increased.
(e) Nothing in this section will prohibit vertical expansion up to the height
allowed in the applicable use environment, provided all other applicable
requirements of City’s development regulations are met.
(f) Upkeep, repairs, and maintenance of a nonconforming structure or other
improvement shall be permitted.
(2) Should such structure or other improvement be moved for any reason for any
distance, it shall thereafter conform to the regulations for the use environment in
which it is located. Conformance shall be required when:
(a) A change of use is proposed;
(b) The use is terminated or discontinued for more than one year, or the
structure(s) that houses the use is vacated for more than one year; or
(c) The structure(s) or activity that occurs on the land in which the use is
conducted is proposed for relocation.
Page 347 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 158
(3) Residential structures and appurtenant structures that were legally established
and are used for a conforming use, but that do not meet standards for the
following, shall be considered a conforming structure: setbacks, buffers, or
yards; area; bulk; height; or density.
(4) For purposes of this section, “appurtenant structures” refer to garages, sheds,
and other legally established structures. Appurtenant structures do not include
bulkheads and other shoreline modifications or overwater structures.
(1) 29.01.630 Nonconforming LotsA nonconforming lot may be developed if
permitted by other land use regulations of the local government and so long as
such development conforms to all other requirements of the applicable master
program and the act.
Page 348 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 159
Article VII. Administration and Enforcements
29.01.700 Roles and Responsibilities
(1) Shoreline Administrator:
(a) The Community and Economic Development Director of the City of Pasco
or his/her designee shall serve as the Shoreline Administrator. The
Shoreline Administrator shall issue written Shoreline Exemptions as
appropriate, and in the case of a Shoreline Substantial Development
Permit grant or deny the permit. The Shoreline Administrator shall
administer the shoreline permit and notification systems and shall be
responsible for coordinating the administration of shoreline regulations
with zoning enforcement, building permits, and all other regulations
regarding land use and development in the City.
(b) The Shoreline Administrator shall be familiar with regulatory measures
pertaining to shorelines and their use, and, within the limits of his or her
authority, shall cooperate in the administration of these measures. Permits
issued under the provisions of this shoreline regulation shall be
coordinated with other applicable land use and development regulatory
measures of the City. The Shoreline Administrator shall establish
procedures that advise all parties seeking building permits or other
development authorization of the need to consider possible shoreline
applications. It is the intent of City, consistent with its regulatory
obligations, to simplify and facilitate the processing of
Shoreline Substantial Development Permits.
(c) The Shoreline Administrator shall ensure proposed regulatory or
administrative actions do not unconstitutionally infringe upon private
property rights. Shoreline goals and policies should be pursued through
the regulation of development of private property only to an extent that is
consistent with all relevant constitutional and other legal limitations
(where applicable, statutory limitations such as those contained in
RCW 82.02 and RCW 43.21C.060) on the regulation of private property.
(d) The Shoreline Administrator shall apply PMC 29.01.500, Critical Areas.
(2) Hearing Examiner:
(a) The Hearing Examiner shall have the authority to decide on appeals from
administrative decisions issued by the Shoreline Administrator of this
SMP.
(b) The Hearing Examiner may grant or deny Shoreline Variances following a
public hearing.
Page 349 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 160
(3) Planning Commission:
(a) The Planning Commission is vested with the responsibility to review the
SMP as part of regular SMP updates required by RCW 90.58.080 as a
major element of the City's planning and regulatory program and make
recommendations for amendments thereof to the City Council.
(b) The Planning Commission reviews Shoreline Special Use Permits,
following an open record hearing, and sends a recommendation to the
City Council.
(4) City Council. The City Council is vested with authority to:
(a) Initiate an amendment to this SMP according to the procedures prescribed
in WAC 173-26-100.
(b) Adopt all amendments to this SMP, after consideration of the
recommendation of the Planning Commission. Substantive amendments
shall become effective immediately upon adoption by Ecology.
(c) Approve or deny all shoreline Special Use Permits forwarded by the
Planning Commission pursuant to PMC 25.86.090.
(d) Conducts closed record appeal of any recommendation of the
Planning Commission pursuant to PMC 25.86.080.
(e) Decide on appeals from the administrative decisions issued by the
Shoreline Administrator.
29.01.710 Interpretation
(1) Under the administrative provisions, the Shoreline Administrator shall have
authority to interpret this SMP, when such interpretation is clearly consistent
with the goals and policies of this SMP and the SMA.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator shall consult with Ecology if formal written
interpretations are developed as a result of a lack of clear guidance in the SMA,
the SMP guidelines, or this SMP to ensure any are consistent with the purpose
and intent of RCW 90.58 and 173-26 WAC.
29.01.720 Statutory Noticing Requirements
(1) At a minimum, the Shoreline Administrator shall provide notice in accordance
with WAC 173.27-110 and may provide for additional noticing requirements.
Page 350 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 161
29.01.730 Application Requirements
(1) A complete application for a Shoreline Substantial Development,
Shoreline Special Use, or Shoreline Variance Permit shall contain, at a
minimum, contain the information listed in WAC 173-27-180.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator shall provide written informational materials,
procedures, instructions, and forms required to submit an application for a
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, Variance Permit, or Special Use
Permit.
(3) These materials should include: a plan coversheet; a Joint Aquatic Resource
Permits Application (JARPA) form; a SEPA checklist; a fee schedule; review
criteria; and the process and timelines to assist potential applicants and
interested parties on the permit application submittal and review process.
(4) The Shoreline Administrator may vary or waive these requirements according to
administrative application requirements on a case-by-case basis.
(5) The Shoreline Administrator may require additional specific information
depending on the nature of the proposal and the presence of sensitive ecological
features or issues related to compliance with other applicable requirements and
the provisions of this SMP.
29.01.740 Shoreline Substantial Development Permits
(1) A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit shall be required for all
development on shorelines, unless the proposal is specifically exempted per
PMC 29.01.770. Shoreline Substantial Development permits shall be processed
as an administrative permit.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator shall review Substantial Development Permit
applications, as required in PMC 29.01.730, and approve or deny the permit.
(3) The Shoreline Administrator shall provide notice in accordance with
WAC 173.27-110 and may provide additional notice, according to the City’s
noticing requirements.
(4) A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit shall be granted only when the
development proposed is consistent with:
(a) The policies and procedures of the SMA, RCW 90.58;
(b) The applicable provisions of WAC 173-27; and
(c) This SMP.
Page 351 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 162
(5) The Shoreline Administrator may attach conditions to the approval of permits as
necessary to ensure consistency of the project with the SMA and this SMP.
(6) Nothing shall interfere with the City's ability to require compliance with all
other applicable plans and laws.
29.01.750 Shoreline Special Use Permits
(1) Uses specifically classified or set forth in this SMP as conditional uses shall be
subject to review and condition by the Shoreline Administrator and Ecology.
Applications for a Shoreline Special Use Permit shall be processed pursuant to
PMC 25.86.
(2) Other uses, which are not classified or listed or set forth in this SMP, may be
authorized as conditional uses provided the applicant can demonstrate
consistency with the requirements of this Section and the requirements for
conditional uses contained in this SMP.
(3) Uses that are specifically prohibited by this SMP may not be authorized as a
conditional use.
(4) Review Criteria for Shoreline Special Use Permit. Uses that are classified or set
forth in the applicable SMP as conditional uses may be authorized provided that
the applicant demonstrates all of the following:
(a) That the proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020
and the SMP;
(b) That the proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of
public shorelines;
(c) That the proposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible
with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the
area under the Comprehensive Plan and SMP;
(d) That the proposed use will cause no significant adverse effects to the
shoreline environment in which it is to be located; and
(e) That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect.
(5) In the granting of all Shoreline Special Use Permits, consideration shall be
given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area.
For example, if Shoreline Special Use Permits were granted for other
developments in the area where similar circumstances exist, the total of the
conditional uses shall also remain consistent with the policies of RCW
90.58.020 and shall not produce substantial adverse effects to the shoreline
environment.
Page 352 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 163
(6) In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached to the
permit by the City or Ecology to prevent undesirable effects of the proposed use
and/or to ensure consistency of the project with the SMA and this SMP.
(7) Nothing shall interfere with the City's ability to require compliance with all
other applicable plans and laws.
29.01.760 Shoreline Variance Permits
(1) The purpose of a variance is to grant relief to specific bulk, dimensional, or
performance requirements set forth in this SMP where there are extraordinary or
unique circumstances relating to the property such that the strict implementation
of this SMP would impose unnecessary hardships on the applicant or thwart the
policies set forth in RCW 90.58.020. Variances from the use regulations of the
SMP are prohibited. Applications for Shoreline Variance Permits shall be
processed pursuant to PMC 25.84.020 and PMC 29.01.760 (2).
(2) Review Criteria:
(a) Shoreline Variance Permits should be granted in circumstances where
denial of the permit would result in a thwarting of the policy enumerated
in RCW 90.58.020. In all instances, the applicant must demonstrate that
extraordinary circumstances shall be shown and the public interest shall
suffer no substantial detrimental effect.
(b) Shoreline Variance Permits for development and/or uses that will be
located landward of the OHWM, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(b),
and/or landward of any wetland, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(h), may
be authorized provided the applicant can demonstrate all of the following:
(i) That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional, or performance
standards set forth in the SMP precludes, or significantly interferes
with, reasonable use of the property;
(ii) That the hardship described in criterion PMC 29.01.760 (2)(b)(i) of
this subsection is specifically related to the property and is the
result of unique conditions, such as irregular lot shape, size, or
natural features, and the application of the SMP, and not, for
example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions;
(iii) That the design of the project is compatible with other authorized
uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the
Comprehensive Plan and SMP and will not cause adverse impacts
on the shoreline environment;
(iv) That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege not
enjoyed by the other properties in the area;
Page 353 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 164
(v) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to afford
relief; and
(vi) That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect.
(c) Shoreline Variance Permits for development and/or uses that will be
located waterward of the OHWM, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(b), or
within any wetland, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(h), may be
authorized provided the applicant can demonstrate all of the following:
(i) That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional, or performance
standards set forth in the applicable SMP precludes all reasonable
use of the property;
(ii) That the proposal is consistent with the criteria established under
PMC 29.01.760 (2)(b) (i)-(iv) above can be met; and
(iii) That the public rights of navigation and use of the shorelines will
not be adversely affected.
(d) In the granting of all Shoreline Variance Permits, consideration shall be
given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the
area. For example, if variances were granted to other developments and/or
uses in the area where similar circumstances exist, the total of the
variances shall also remain consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020
and shall not cause substantial adverse effects to the shoreline
environment.
29.01.770 Exemptions from Shoreline Substantial Development Permits
(1) An exemption from the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit process is
not an exemption from compliance with the SMA or this SMP, or from any
other regulatory requirements. All proposed uses, activities, or development
occurring within shoreline jurisdiction must conform to the intent and
requirements of RCW 90.58, the SMA, and this SMP, whether or not a permit
or other form of authorization is required.
(2) Letters of exemption shall be issued by the Shoreline Administrator when an
exemption applies or when a letter of exemption is required by the provisions of
WAC 173-27-050 and as follows:
(a) Any person claiming exemption from the Substantial Development Permit
requirements shall make an application to the Shoreline Administrator for
such an exemption in the manner prescribed by the
Shoreline Administrator, except that no written statement of exemption is
required for emergency development pursuant to WAC 173-27-040(2)(d).
Page 354 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 165
(b) The Shoreline Administrator is authorized to grant or deny requests for
statements of exemption from the Shoreline Substantial Development
Permit requirement for uses and developments within shorelines that are
specifically listed in PMC Section 29.01.770 (4). The statement shall be in
writing and shall indicate the specific exemption of this SMP that is being
applied to the development and shall provide a summary of the
Shoreline Administrator’s analysis of the consistency of the project with
this SMP and the SMA. The letter shall be sent to the applicant and
maintained on file in the offices of the Shoreline Administrator.
(c) Statements of exemption may contain conditions and/or mitigating
measures of approval to achieve consistency and compliance with the
provisions of this SMP and the SMA.
(d) A denial of an exemption shall be in writing and shall identify the
reason(s) for the denial. The Shoreline Administrator’s decision may be
appealed pursuant to PMC 29.01.810, Appeals.
(e) Exempt activities requiring a JARPA shall not be conducted until a
statement of exemption has been obtained from the
Shoreline Administrator.
(3) Interpretations of Exemptions:
(a) Exemptions shall be construed narrowly. Only those developments that
meet the precise terms of one or more of the listed exemptions may be
granted exemption from the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
process.
(b) A development or use that is listed as a conditional use pursuant to this
SMP, or is an unlisted use, must obtain a Shoreline Special Use Permit
even though the development or use does not require a
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. When a development or use is
proposed that does not comply with the bulk, dimensional, and
performance standards of this SMP, such development or use can only be
authorized by approval of a Shoreline Variance Permit.
(c) The burden of proof that a development or use is exempt from the permit
process is on the applicant.
(d) If any part of a proposed development is not eligible for exemption, then a
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is required for the entire
proposed development project.
(e) The Shoreline Administrator may attach conditions to the approval of
exempted developments and/or uses as necessary to ensure consistency of
the project with the SMA and this SMP. Additionally, nothing shall
Page 355 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 166
interfere with each responsible local government's ability to require
compliance with all other applicable laws and plans.
(4) The City shall exempt from the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
requirement the shoreline developments listed below:
(a) Any development of which the total cost or fair market value does not
exceed eight thousand, five hundred, four dollars ($8,504 or as adjusted by
the State Office of Financial Management, if such development does not
materially interfere with the normal public use of the water or shorelines
of the state. For purposes of determining whether or not a permit is
required, the total cost or fair market value shall be based on the value of
development that is occurring on shorelines of the state as defined in RCW
90.58.030 (2)(c). The total cost or fair market value of the development
shall include the fair market value of any donated, contributed, or found
labor, as well as equipment, or materials.
(b) Normal maintenance or repair of existing legally established structures or
developments, including damage by accident, fire, or elements.
Replacement of a structure or development may be authorized as repair
where such replacement is the common method of repair for the type of
structure or development and the replacement structure or development is
comparable to the original structure or development, including, but not
limited to, its size, shape, configuration, location, and external appearance
and the replacement does not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline
resources or environment.
(c) Construction of a normal protective bulkhead common to single-family
residences. A normal protective bulkhead includes those structural and
non-structural developments installed at or near, and parallel to, the
OHWM for the sole purpose of protecting an existing single-family
residence and appurtenant structures from loss or damage by erosion. A
normal protective bulkhead is not exempt if constructed for the purpose of
creating dry land. When a vertical or near vertical wall is being
constructed or reconstructed, not more than 1 cubic yard of fill per one
1 foot of wall may be used as backfill. When an existing bulkhead is being
repaired by construction of a vertical wall fronting the existing wall, it
shall be constructed no farther waterward of the existing bulkhead than is
necessary for construction of new footings. When a bulkhead has
deteriorated such that an OHWM has been established by the presence and
action of water landward of the bulkhead, then the replacement bulkhead
must be located at or near the actual OHWM. Bioengineered
erosion-control projects may be considered a normal protective bulkhead
when any structural elements are consistent with the above requirements
and when the project has been approved by WDFW.
Page 356 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 167
(d) Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the
elements. An emergency is an unanticipated and imminent threat to public
health, safety, or the environment that requires immediate action within a
time too short to allow full compliance with this SMP. Emergency
construction does not include development of new permanent protective
structures where none previously existed. Where new protective structures
are deemed by the Shoreline Administrator to be the appropriate means to
address the emergency situation, and upon abatement of the emergency
situation, the new structure shall be removed or any permit that would
have been required, absent an emergency, pursuant to RCW 90.58 these
regulations, or this SMP, shall be obtained. All emergency construction
shall be consistent with the policies and requirements of this section, RCW
90.58, and this SMP. As a general matter, flooding or other seasonal
events that can be anticipated and may occur but that are not imminent are
not an emergency.
(i) The following criteria shall exist to qualify any action under an
emergency provision:
(A) There must be an immediate threat to life, or public or
private property, or an immediate threat of serious
environmental degradation arising from a natural condition,
or non-natural accident or incident;
(B) The emergency response shall be confined to the action
necessary to protect life or property from damage;
(C) The scope of the emergency response must be limited to the
work necessary to relieve the immediate threat; and
(D) The emergency response applies only to the period of time
in which the actual emergency exists.
(ii) Once the emergency is abated or dissipated as deemed by
jurisdictional authorities, compliance with the requirements of this
section is required.
(iii) Emergency actions shall use reasonable methods that minimize the
impact to critical areas and their buffers. Persons who take
emergency action shall notify the Shoreline Administrator within
1 working day following commencement of the emergency
activity. Following such notification, the Shoreline Administrator
shall determine if the action taken was within the scope and
definition of emergency actions as defined above. If the
Shoreline Administrator determines the action taken or any part of
the action taken was beyond the scope and definition of allowed
Page 357 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 168
emergency actions, then the enforcement provisions of
PMC 29.01.830 shall apply.
(e) Construction and practices normal or necessary for farming, irrigation, and
ranching activities, including agricultural service roads and utilities on
shorelands and the construction and maintenance of irrigation structures,
including, but not limited to, head gates, pumping facilities, and irrigation
channels. A feedlot of any size, all processing plants, other activities of a
commercial nature, and alteration of the contour of the shorelands by
leveling or filling, other than that which results from normal cultivation,
shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or ranching activities.
(f) Construction or modification of navigational aids such as channel markers
and anchor buoys.
(g) Construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a
single-family residence or appurtenance for their own use or for the use of
their family, which residence does not exceed a height of 35 feet above
average grade level and which meets all requirements of the City, other
than requirements imposed pursuant to RCW 90.58. Construction
authorized under this exemption, shall be located landward of the OHWM.
(h) Construction of a dock, including a community dock designed for pleasure
craft only and for the private non-commercial use of the owner, lessee, or
contract purchaser of a single-family or multiple-family residence. A dock
is a landing and moorage facility for watercraft and does not include
recreational decks, storage facilities or other appurtenances. This
exception applies when the fair market value of the dock does not exceed:
a. Twenty-two thousand five hundred dollars ($22,500) for docks that are
constructed to replace existing docks, are of equal or lesser square footage
than the existing dock being replaced; or
b. Eleven thousand two hundred ($11,200) dollars for all other docks
constructed in fresh waters.
c. However, if subsequent construction occurs within five years of completion of
the prior construction, and the combined fair market value of the
subsequent and prior construction exceeds the amount specified above, the
subsequent construction shall be considered a substantial development for
the purpose of this chapter.
(i) Operation, maintenance, repair, or construction of canals, waterways,
drains, reservoirs, or other facilities that now exist or are hereafter created
or developed as a part of an irrigation system for the primary purpose of
making use of system waters, including return flow and artificially stored
groundwater from the irrigation of lands.
Page 358 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 169
(j) The marking of property lines or corners on state-owned lands, when such
marking does not significantly interfere with normal public use of the
surface of the water.
(k) Operation and maintenance of existing and future system of dikes, drains,
or other facilities existing on September 8, 1975 (where water is being
drained from irrigation runoff or shallow groundwater levels artificially
recharged through irrigation, and that), which are created, developed or
utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or diking system.
(l) Site exploration and investigation activities that are prerequisite to
preparation of an application for development authorization under this
section, if:
(i) The activity does not interfere with the normal public use of
surface waters;
(ii) The activity will have no significant adverse impact on the
environment, including, but not limited to, fish, wildlife, fish or
wildlife habitat, water quality, and aesthetic values;
(iii) The activity does not involve the installation of any structure and,
upon completion of the activity, the vegetation and land
configuration of the site are restored to conditions existing before
the activity; and
(iv) A private entity seeking development authorization under this
section first posts a performance bond or provides other evidence
of financial responsibility to the local jurisdiction to ensure the site
is restored to preexisting conditions.
(m) The process of removing or controlling aquatic noxious weeds, as defined
in RCW 17.26.020, through the use of an herbicide or other treatment
methods applicable to weed control published by the Departments of
Agriculture or Ecology jointly with other state agencies under
RCW 43.21C.
(n) Watershed restoration projects as defined in RCW 89.08.460.
(o) A public or private project that is designed to improve fish or wildlife
habitat or fish passage, consistent with RCW 90.58.147 and RCW 77.55.
(p) Other than conversions to non-forest land use, forest practices regulated
under RCW 76.09 are not subject to additional regulations under the SMA
or this SMP (90.58.030(2)(d)(ii)).
(q) The external or internal retrofitting of an existing structure with the
exclusive purpose of compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
Page 359 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 170
of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.) or to otherwise provide physical
access to the structure by individuals with disabilities.
29.01.780 Duration of Permits
(1) The duration of permits shall be consistent with WAC 173-27-090 as follows:
(a) Construction activities shall be commenced or, where no construction
activities are involved, the use or activity shall be commenced within
2 years of the effective date of a substantial development permit. The City
may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed 1 year based
on reasonable factors if a request for extension has been filed before the
expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of
record on the substantial development permit and to the department.
(b) Authorization to conduct development activities shall terminate 5 years
after the effective date of a Substantial Development Permit. However, the
City may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed 1 year
based on reasonable factors if a request for extension has been filed before
the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties
of record and to the department.
29.01.790 Initiation of Development
(1) Each permit for a Substantial Development, Shoreline Special Use, or
Shoreline Variance issued by local government shall contain a provision that
construction pursuant to the permit shall not begin and is not authorized until
21 days from the date of filing with Ecology as defined in RCW 90.58.140(6)
and WAC 173-27-130, or until all review proceedings initiated within 21 days
from the date of filing of the decision. The date of filing for a
Substantial Development Permit is the date of actual receipt by Ecology of a
local government's final decision on the permit. With regard to a permit for a
Shoreline Variance or a Shoreline Special Use, date of filing means the date a
responsible local government or applicant receives the written decision of
Ecology. When a Substantial Development Permit and a Special Use or
Variance Permit are required for a development, the submittal on the permits
shall be made concurrently.
(2) Permits for Substantial Development, Shoreline Special Use, or
Shoreline Variance may be in any form prescribed and used by the City,
including a combined permit application form. Such forms will be supplied by
the City.
(3) A permit data sheet shall be submitted to Ecology with each shoreline permit.
The permit data sheet form shall be consistent with WAC 173-27-990.
Page 360 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 171
29.01.800 Review Process
(1) After the City’s approval of a Shoreline Special Use or Variance Permit, the
City shall submit the permit to Ecology for approval, approval with conditions,
or denial. Ecology shall render and transmit to the City and the applicant its
final decision approving, approving with conditions, or disapproving the permit
within 30 days of the date of submittal by the City pursuant to WAC 173-27-
110.
(2) Ecology shall review the complete file submitted by the City on Shoreline
Special Use or Variance Permits and any other information submitted or
available that is relevant to the application. Ecology shall base its determination
to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Special Use Permit or
Variance Permit on consistency with the policy and provisions of the SMA and
except as provided in WAC 173-27-210 and the criteria in WAC 173-27-160
and 173-27-170.
(3) The City shall provide timely notification of the Ecology's final decision to
those interested persons having requested notification from local government
pursuant to WAC 173-27-130.
29.01.810 Appeals
(1) Appeals of Shoreline Permit Decisions. The City’s decisions on shoreline
permits may be appealed to the following bodies in this sequence:
(a) Pasco City Council in accordance with PMC 25.86.080.
(b) State Shorelines Hearings Board (SHB) in Tumwater.
(c) SHB decisions may be appealed to superior court.
(d) Superior court decisions may be appealed to the Court of Appeals.
(e) Appeals Court decisions may be appealed to the Washington Supreme
Court.
(f) Appeals to the SHB and courts are governed by RCW 90.58.180,
RCW 43.21B.001, RCW 34.05 Part V, and WAC 461.08.
(2) All requests for review of any final permit decisions under RCW 90.58 and
WAC 173-27 are governed by the procedures established in RCW 90.58.180,
WAC 461-08, and the rules of practice and procedure of the SHB.
29.01.820 Amendments to Permits
(1) A permit revision is required whenever the applicant proposes substantive
changes to the design, terms, or conditions of a project from that which is
Page 361 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 172
approved in the permit. Changes are substantive if they materially alter the
project in a manner that relates to its conformance to the terms and conditions of
the permit, the SMP, and/or the policies and provisions of RCW 90.58. Changes
that are not substantive in effect do not require approval of a revision.
(2) Revisions to permits shall be considered consistent with WAC 173-27-100.
29.01.830 Enforcement
(1) The SMA provides for a cooperative program between the City and Ecology to
implement and enforce the provisions of the SMA and this SMP. This section
provides for a variety of means of enforcement, including civil and criminal
penalties, orders to cease and desist, and orders to take corrective action, in
accordance with WAC 173-27-270, 173-27-280, 173-27-290, and 173-27-300,
and PMC 25.08. The enforcement means and penalties provided herein are not
exclusive and may be taken or imposed in conjunction with, or in addition to,
any other civil enforcement actions and civil penalties, injunctive or declaratory
relief, criminal prosecution, actions to recover civil or criminal penalties, or any
other action or sanction authorized by this section, or any other provision of the
PMC, or any other provision of state or federal law and regulation.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator, with the assistance of the City Attorney, shall
have authority to commence and prosecute any enforcement action authorized
by this section. In determining the appropriate enforcement actions to be
commenced and prosecuted, the Shoreline Administrator shall consider the
following factors:
(a) The nature of the violation;
(b) The extent of damage or potential future risk to the shoreline environment
and its ecological functions or to the public health and safety, caused by or
resulting from, whether directly or indirectly, the alleged violation;
(c) The existence of knowledge, intent, or malice on behalf of the violator;
(d) The economic benefit or advantage that accrued to the violator(s) as a
result of the violation; and
(e) The estimated actions and costs of providing adequate mitigation,
restoration, rehabilitation, or enhancement to repair or minimize any
substantial adverse impacts upon the shoreline environment and its
ecological functions or the public health and safety.
(3) The Shoreline Administrator may commence and prosecute enforcement action
jointly with Ecology. Pursuant to WAC 173-27, Ecology may initiate and
prosecute enforcement action separate from the Shoreline Administrator.
Page 362 of 465
August 2023
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consulting 173
29.01.840 Cumulative Effects of Shoreline Developments
(1) The City will periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the SMP update for
achieving no net loss of shoreline ecological functions with respect to shoreline
permitting and exemptions. At the end of the first full year after adoption, and at
the end of every other year thereafter, the Shoreline Administrator shall prepare
a report documenting shoreline Substantial Development Permits, Special Use
Permits, and Variances, including the exempt use activity approvals and the
locations and effects of each by type and classifications. The report should
include activities involving development, conservation, restoration, mitigation,
and enforcement. It should summarize the net change of developments
(including new development and decommissioning of structures and protected
areas) using indicators such as linear length of stabilization and flood hazard
structures, number of overwater structures (e.g., piers and docks), road length
within shoreline, number of waterbody road crossings, number of levees/dikes,
acres of impervious surface areas, acres of vegetation, acres of permanently
protected areas, or areas with limited development. Compliance and
enforcement activity will also be tracked.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator Official, will, to the extent feasible, coordinate
with other City departments or as adjacent jurisdictions, to assess cumulative
effects of shoreline development.
29.01.850 Amendments to Shoreline Master Program
(1) Amendments to the SMP shall be processed as legislative decisions pursuant to
PMC 24.88 and WAC 173-26-110.
(2) Any locally approved amendments to the SMP will not become effective until
approved by Ecology.
29.01.860 Shoreline Environment Designation Maps or Official Shoreline Map
Page 363 of 465
TO: Jeff Adams, Associate Planner
CC: Ben Floyd, Consultant to City of Pasco, Lara Floyd, Consultant to City of Pasco, Jackie
Chandler, Shoreline Administrator, WA Department of Ecology
FROM: Heather Bush, Shoreline Planner, WA Department of Ecology
Date: July 13, 2023
Subject: Initial Determination of Consistency
Sent via email to: ben@whitebluffsconsulting.com; lara@whitebluffsconsulting.com; adamsj@pasco-
wa.gov; jcha461@ecy.wa.gov
Use of this Document
Ecology’s Initial Determination of Consistency provides Ecology’s review of the proposed amendment to
the City of Pasco (City) Shoreline Master Program (SMP). This document is divided into two sections:
Findings of Fact, which provides findings related to the City’s proposed amendment, amendment
history, and the review process; and Initial Determination of the proposed amendment with next steps.
Attachment 1 itemizes issues that must be addressed for Ecology’s final approval of the proposed
amendment.
Brief Description of Proposed Amendment
The City has submitted an SMP amendment to Ecology for initial determination of consistency to comply
with periodic review requirements. Ecology is required under WAC 173-26-104(3)(b) to make an initial
determination of consistency with applicable laws and rules.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Need for amendment
The City’s comprehensive update to their SMP went into effect June 27, 2016. Now, the proposed
amendment is needed to comply with the statutory requirement for a periodic review of the Pasco
Shoreline Master Program pursuant to RCW 90.58.080(4).
SMP provisions to be changed by the amendment as proposed
The City prepared a checklist and an analysis that documents the proposed amendment. The
amendment brings the SMP into compliance with requirements of the Act or state rules that have been
added or changed since the last SMP amendment, ensures the SMP remains consistent with amended
comprehensive plans and regulations, and incorporates changes deemed necessary to reflect changed
circumstances, new information, or improved data.
In addition to minor, non-substantive changes such as document organization, general edits to
correct/update syntax, and formatting/citation corrections, the following sections of the SMP are
proposed to be amended:
Page 364 of 465
City of Pasco
Initial Determination of Consistency
2
Section 1: Shoreline Goals and Policies (RCW.90.58.100)
Introduction-Revised to better reflect and differentiate the previous comprehensive update and this
periodic review.
Chapter 4-Development of Goals and Policies
• Shoreline Uses and Modifications Element-Goals:
o Recreational Development Policies- Added “cultural resources” to list of shoreline resources
that should be considered and conserved (12.a).
o Residential Development Policies- Added provision that new residential lots should not be
developed in places that may disturb cultural resources (g.iv).
• Chapter 4.6-Historic, Cultural, Scientific, and Educational Resources Element-Goals- Added “in
compliance with State and Federal laws” for emphasis (1.a).
Section 2: Shoreline Regulations
Article 1. Authority and Purpose
• 29.01.020-Applicability-Added new section to capture developments not required to obtain
shoreline permits or local reviews (1.a-i).
• 29.01.070-Effective Date-Replaced date of adopted SMP with placeholder language.
• 29.01.080-Definitions:
o Deleted the following definitions: ‘Active Fault’; ‘Agricultural Activities’; ‘Agricultural
Products’; ‘Agricultural Equipment’; ‘Agricultural Facilities’; ‘Area of Shallow Flooding’;
‘Area of Special Flood Hazard’; ‘Best Management Practices, Agricultural’; ‘Building
Setback Line’; ‘Designated Floodway’; ‘Developable Area’; ‘Ecological Functions or
Shoreline Functions’; ‘Flood Insurance Study’; ‘Floodproofing’; ‘Floodway Dependent
Structure’; ‘Heavy Equipment’; ‘Lowest Floor’; ‘Primitive Trail’; ‘Section 404 Permit’;
‘Site Assessment Requirements’; ‘Tree Removal’; ‘Vegetation Alteration’; and ‘Water
Resources Inventory Area.’
o Revised the following definitions: ‘Development’; and ‘Public Access, Visual Access.’
o Added the following definitions: ‘Nonconforming Development or Nonconforming
Structure’; ‘Nonconforming Lot’; and ‘Nonconforming Use.’
Article III-General Regulations-29.01.200-Shoreline Use and Modification
• 29.01.220-Archeological and Historical Resources-Added a provision clarifying City’s intent to
coordinate with tribal, state, and federal agencies and work with tribes during the permit review
process.
Article IV. Shoreline Modifications and Use Regulations
• 29.01.300-Agriculture- Revised provision to clarify that new agricultural activities should not
remove vegetation, except for noxious and invasive vegetation (4.10).
Article V. Critical Areas-29.01.520-Wetlands
• 29.01.520 (8)(b): Land Use Intensity Table
o Revised subsection headers and table title.
o Deleted “retail sales” and replaced with “mixed-use developments.”
o Updated land-use intensity table per 2022 CAO Guidance.
• Buffer Widths Modifications- Updated buffer reduction allowances from 65% to 75% of the
recommended width per Ecology guidance (9.a.i)(D).
Page 365 of 465
City of Pasco
Initial Determination of Consistency
3
• Compensatory Mitigation- Updated reference to Ecology’s Joint Agency mitigation guidance
document, Version 2 revised and published in 2021 (10.b).
• Table 29.01.520 (13): Wetland Mitigation Ratios (for Eastern Washington)
o Updated ratio table to reflect current mitigation guidance recommendations.
o Updated notes including footers to reflect current mitigation guidance
recommendations.
Article VI. Existing Uses, Structures, and Lots
• 29.01.630-Nonconforming Lots-Added provision that a nonconforming lot may be developed if
permitted by other land use regulations as long as it conforms to SMA/SMP regulations.
Article VII. Administration and Enforcements
• 29.01.770- Exemptions from Shoreline Substantial Development Permits-Interpretations of
Exemptions:
o Monetary threshold value updated for substantial developments (4.a).
o Monetary threshold updated for freshwater docks (4.h)(a-c)
o Deleted a provision that projects certified by the governor pursuant to RCW 80.50, are
exempt from an SSDP.
o Added a reference to RCW 90.58.147 and RCW 77.55 (o).
o Added a new exemption addressing the retrofitting of existing structures for compliance
with the Americans with Disabilities Act (q).
• 29.01.790-Initiation of Development-Replaced “date of receipt” with “date of filing” (1).
• 29.01.840-Review Process-Cumulative Effects of Shoreline Developments-Added “Official” to
Shoreline Administrator title (2).
Amendment History, Review Process
The City prepared a public participation program in accordance with WAC 173-26-090(3)(a) to inform,
involve and encourage participation of interested persons and private entities, tribes, and applicable
agencies having interests and responsibilities relating to shorelines. An important element of the public
participation plan is the City’s SMP Periodic Review project website1. A consultant, hired by the City,
developed draft documents.
The City used Ecology’s checklist of legislative and rule amendments to review changes to chapter 90.58
RCW and department guidelines that have occurred since the SMP was last amended, and to determine
if local amendments were needed to maintain compliance in accordance with WAC 173-26-090(3)(b)(i).
The City also reviewed changes to the comprehensive plan and development regulations to determine if
the SMP policies and regulations remain consistent with them in accordance with WAC 173-26-
090(3)(b)(ii). The City considered whether to incorporate any amendments needed to reflect changed
circumstances, new information or improved data in accordance with WAC 173-26-090(3)(b)(iii). The
City consulted with Ecology and solicited comments throughout the review process.
The record indicates the City completed a SEPA checklist and issued a Determination of Non-Significance
(DNS) on June 16, 2023 for the proposed SMP amendment.
1 https://www.pasco-wa.gov/858/Shoreline-Master-Program
Page 366 of 465
City of Pasco
Initial Determination of Consistency
4
Joint local/state public comment period and hearing
The City held a joint local/state comment period on the proposed amendment following procedures
outlined in WAC 173-26-104. The comment period began on March 26, 2023 and continued through
April 25, 2023. A virtual public hearing before the Planning Commission was held on April 20, 2023.
Ecology staff attended. A second public hearing was held June 14th, 2023 to provide an additional
opportunity for public comment.
The City provided notice to local parties, including a statement that the hearings were intended to
address the periodic review in accordance with WAC 173-26-090(3)(c)(ii). The City’s record indicates
notice of the first hearing was published in The Tri-City Herald on March 26, 2023. Ecology distributed
notice of the joint comment period to state interested parties on March 15, 2023, including separate
notice and an invitation for consultation to the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation
and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation. Notice of the second hearing was published in
The Tri-City Herald on May 28, 2023. Ecology distributed notices to interested parties and tribes for the
second hearing on June 7, 2023.
The City received comments from two tribal representatives, one state agency, and two individuals. One
comment focused on how Pasco Parks manages vegetation in an urban conservancy area and were
referred to the City to address this implementation issue. The City received one comment from the
Colville Tribe, noting that the project was in the Tri-Cities Archeological District and other sensitive
areas, and encouraging the City to include all appropriate laws governing cultural resources. The Tribe
urged communication with other area tribes, DAHP, federal and state agencies. The City received one
comment from the Umatilla Tribe, which included suggestions for ensuring that shoreline development
provides protection to areas with historic, cultural, and archeological value. A comment from WDNR
recommended updating references to the WGS Geologic Information Portal. Additional topics raised
included definitions section updates, ensuring consistency with other City regulations, ensuring correct
implementation of the SMP, and SSDP exemptions.
Comments were reviewed by City staff and consultants and considered by the Planning Commission. The
City referred one comment about compliance with the current SMP to relevant City departments for
further follow-up. The City revised the definition for “visual access” to include views of shoreline
vegetation and wildlife as well as water views in response to one individual comment. In response to
comments from WDNR the City added a reference to the WGS Geologic Information Portal and other
WGS resources, and replaced the word “qualified consultant” with “qualified professional” for those
qualified to perform Critical Area Detailed Studies. In response to the Umatilla Tribe’s comments, the
City added language emphasizing the importance of collaboration with other tribal, state, and federal
agencies, and strengthened language around cultural and historic resource preservation and protection.
No other changes were made to the amendment in response to comments.
The City submitted the proposed amendment to Ecology for initial state review on June 15, 2023 with
additional materials submitted June 16 and 19, 2023. Ecology verified that the submittal was complete
on June 20, 2023. This began Ecology’s review and initial determination.
Initial Determination of Consistency
Ecology is required to review all SMPs to ensure consistency with the Shoreline Management Act (SMA)
and implementing rules including WAC 173-26, State Master Program Approval/Amendment Procedures
Page 367 of 465
City of Pasco
Initial Determination of Consistency
5
and Master Program Guidelines. WAC 173-26-186(11) specifies that Ecology “shall insure that the state’s
interest in shorelines is protected, including compliance with the policy and provisions of RCW
90.58.020.”
Summary of issues identified by Ecology as relevant to our initial determination
Based on review of the proposed amendments to the SMP for consistency with applicable SMP
Guidelines requirements and the Shoreline Management Act, and consideration of supporting materials
in the record submitted by the City, the following issues are relevant to Ecology’s initial determination of
consistency on the proposed amendments to the City’s SMP.
Activities that do not meet the Definition of Development
The City’s SMP applies to all development within shoreline jurisdiction. “Development” is a term of art
defined in the statute, as set forth in RCW 90.58.030(3)(a) and WAC 173-27-030(6). The City has
proposed a list of items intended to interpret and clarify that definition for staff and applicants; however
certain items in the proposed list could potentially meet the definition of development and are
therefore not appropriate to include. Most notably, routine repair and maintenance is often considered
development and it may be covered under the exemption set forth in WAC 173-27-040(2)(b). The list
may therefore lead the City to implement the definition of development inconsistent with the SMA.
Finding. Ecology finds that a change is required for consistency with RCW 90.58.030(3)(a) and WAC 173-
27-030(6) (see Attachment 1, REQ-1).
Agricultural Activities
The proposed amendment deletes the SMP’s definitions of agricultural activities and associated terms,
with the rationale that these terms are not used explicitly in the SMP. Definitions in the SMP must be
consistent with the statute and Guidelines to ensure implementation of the SMP consistent with the
SMA. Existing agricultural activities are not subject to the SMA under very specific language in RCW
90.58.065, and thus do not require shoreline permits. The requirements of the SMP only apply to new
agricultural activities on land not already in agricultural use, and there are other approvals and permits
that may be required for new agricultural activities. Since Pasco’s SMP addresses new agriculture, it
must contain these definitions. The definitions in this section of the RCW are used to define the scope of
the exception for agriculture, and include agricultural activities, agricultural products, agricultural
equipment, and agricultural land.
Finding. Ecology finds reinstating these definitions is required for consistency with RCW 90.58.065 and
WAC 173-26-020(3) (see Attachment 1, REQ-2).
Floodway Definition
The City’s definition of floodway appears to be from the zoning code and is inconsistent with the
narrower definition of floodway as defined in WAC 173-26-020(20)(b). While it is within the City’s
discretion to select the SMA floodway definition instead of the FEMA definition, the definition in the
SMP must be consistent with RCW 90.58.030(2)(b)(ii).
Finding. Ecology finds that a change is required for consistency with RCW 90.58.030 (2)(b)(ii) and WAC
173-26-020(2)(b) (see Attachment 1, REQ-3).
Page 368 of 465
City of Pasco
Initial Determination of Consistency
6
Consistency with Ecology’s Guidance for Wetlands Protection
The SMP Guidelines direct local governments to consult “the most current, accurate, and complete
scientific and technical information available” to inform SMP policies and regulations, with specific
reference to Ecology’s technical assistance materials (WAC 173-26-201(2)(a)). Ecology updated its
guidance on wetland protections for critical areas regulations in 2016, 2018, and 2022. Ecology finds
that Article V of the SMP, which contains regulations for critical areas in shoreline jurisdiction, contains a
buffer table that does not list bogs, which per Ecology’s wetland guidance should be assigned the largest
buffers together with Wetlands of High Conservation Value. Because they are omitted from the table,
bogs would be assigned smaller buffers based on habitat score, inconsistent with Ecology’s wetland
guidance. Without updating this table in accordance with the guidance, implementation of the City’s
SMP may lead to loss of wetland functions and values, and ultimately to shoreline ecological functions.
Finding. Ecology finds that a change is required for consistency of the SMP’s critical areas regulations
with WAC 173-26-201(2)(a) and WAC 173-26-201(2)(c) (see Attachment 1, REQ-4).
Additional items identified as recommended changes
In addition to the issues identified above, Ecology has identified three (3) changes recommended to fix
minor errors, provide clarity, and improve implementation.
Finding. Ecology finds that Attachment 1, items Rec-1 through Rec-3, if implemented would be consistent
with the policy and standards of RCW 90.58 and the applicable guidelines; however, the inclusion of this
change is at the discretion of the City and is not necessary in order to approve this periodic review
amendment.
INITIAL DETERMINATION
The following constitutes Ecology’s written statement of initial concurrence, consistent with WAC
173-26-104(3)(b)(ii):
After review by Ecology of the complete record submitted and all comments received, Ecology has
determined that the City’s proposed amendments, subject to and including Ecology’s required changes
(itemized in Attachment 1), are consistent with the policy and standards of RCW 90.58.020 and RCW
90.58.090 and the applicable SMP guidelines (WAC 173-26-171 through -251 and -020, Definitions).
Next Steps
The City should consider the changes Ecology has identified in Attachment 1 to resolve the issues
identified above. Please let me know if you would like to discuss alternative language or different
approaches for resolving these issues. If these issues are resolved prior to local adoption, we anticipate
being able to approve your SMP periodic review amendment promptly after formal submittal is
provided consistent with WAC 173-26-110.
Page 369 of 465
ATTACHMENT 1: PASCO SMP PERIODIC REVIEW AMENDMENT – ECOLOGY INITIAL DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY 7/13/2023
Changes in red are required to comply with the Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) and the SMP Guidelines (WAC 173-26, Part III). Changes in blue are recommended and are consistent
with SMA policy and the SMP Guidelines. Single strikethrough and underline reflect the City’s proposed amendments; double strikethrough and double underline reflect Ecology changes.
Page 1 of 6
ITEM SMP PROVISION BILL FORMAT CHANGES (UNDERLINE = ADDITIONS; STRIKETHROUGH = DELETIONS) DISCUSSION/RATIONALE
Article I: Authority and Purpose
REQ-1
Rec-1
Section 2: Shoreline
Regulations-Article 1.
Authority and Purpose-
29.01.020. Applicability
29.01.020. Applicability
(1) This SMP applies to all development, the construction or
exterior alteration of structures; dredging; drilling; dumping;
filling; removal of any sand, gravel, minerals or vegetation;
bulkheading; driving of piling; placing of obstructions; or any
project of a permanent or temporary nature which interferes
with the normal public use of the surface of the waters of the
state subject to Chapter 90.58 RCW at any stage of water
level. Development does not include the following activities
The following activities do not meet the definition of
development:
a) Interior building improvements;
b) Exterior structure maintenance activities, including
painting and roofing, as long as it does not expand the
existing footprint of the structure;
c) Routine landscape maintenance of established,
ornamental landscaping, such as lawn mowing,
pruning and weeding;
d) Maintenance Routine cleaning of the following
existing facilities that does not expand the affected
area: septic tanks (routine cleaning), wells, and
individual utility service connections;
e) Dismantling or removing structures if there is no other
associated development or redevelopment;
f) Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any person conducting a
remedial action at a facility pursuant to a consent
decree, order, or agreed order issued pursuant to RCW
Required change: Development is defined in the statute, as set
forth in RCW 90.58.030(3)(a) and WAC 173-27-030(6). We
understand the intent to interpret and clarify that definition for
staff and applicants; however certain items in the proposed list
could potentially meet the definition of development and are
therefore not appropriate to set aside in this way. Most notably,
routine repair and maintenance does often meet the definition of
development, and where it does, it may be covered under the
exemption set forth in WAC 173-27-040(2)(b). These changes are
required for consistency with RCW 90.58.030(3)(a) and WAC 173-
27-030(6).
Recommended change: Changes are recommended to better align
with the language of the statute and Guidelines.
Page 370 of 465
ATTACHMENT 1: PASCO SMP PERIODIC REVIEW AMENDMENT – ECOLOGY INITIAL DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY 7/13/2023
Changes in red are required to comply with the Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) and the SMP Guidelines (WAC 173-26, Part III). Changes in blue are recommended and are consistent
with SMA policy and the SMP Guidelines. Single strikethrough and underline reflect the City’s proposed amendments; double strikethrough and double underline reflect Ecology changes.
Page 2 of 6
ITEM SMP PROVISION BILL FORMAT CHANGES (UNDERLINE = ADDITIONS; STRIKETHROUGH = DELETIONS) DISCUSSION/RATIONALE
70.305 RCW 70A.305, or to Ecology when it conducts a
remedial action under RCW 70.305 RCW 70A.305;
g) Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any person installing site
improvements for storm water treatment in an
existing boatyard facility to meet requirements of a
national pollutant discharge elimination system storm
water general permit;
h) Washington State Department of Transportation
projects and activities meeting the conditions of RCW
90.58.356;
i) Projects consistent with an environmental excellence
program agreement pursuant to RCW 90.58.045 and
RCW 43.21K;
j) Projects authorized through the Energy Facility Site
Evaluation Council process, pursuant to RCW 80.50;
and
k) Areas and uses in those areas that are under exclusive
federal jurisdiction as established through federal or
state statutes are not subject to the jurisdiction of
RCW 90.58.
Page 371 of 465
ATTACHMENT 1: PASCO SMP PERIODIC REVIEW AMENDMENT – ECOLOGY INITIAL DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY 7/13/2023
Changes in red are required to comply with the Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) and the SMP Guidelines (WAC 173-26, Part III). Changes in blue are recommended and are consistent
with SMA policy and the SMP Guidelines. Single strikethrough and underline reflect the City’s proposed amendments; double strikethrough and double underline reflect Ecology changes.
Page 3 of 6
REQ-2 Section 2: Shoreline
Regulations-Article 1.
Authority and Purpose-
29.01.080 Definitions-
Agricultural Activities,
Agricultural Products,
Agricultural Equipment, and
Agricultural Facilities.
(5) "Agricultural activities" means agricultural uses and practices including, but
not limited to: producing, breeding, or increasing agricultural products;
rotating and changing agricultural crops; allowing land used for agricultural
activities to lie fallow in which it is plowed and tilled but left unseeded;
allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant as a result of
adverse agricultural market conditions; allowing land used for agricultural
activities to lie dormant because the land is enrolled in a local, state, or federal
conservation program, or the land is subject to a conservation easement;
conducting agricultural operations; maintaining, repairing, and replacing
agricultural equipment; maintaining, repairing, and replacing agricultural
facilities, provided that the replacement facility is no closer to the shoreline
than the original facility; and maintaining agricultural lands under production
or cultivation. Also see definition of "New Agricultural Activities" below.
(6) "Agricultural products" includes: but is not limited to horticultural,
viticultural, floricultural, and vegetable, fruit, berry, grain, hops, hay, straw,
turf, sod, seed, and apiary products; feed or forage for livestock; Christmas
trees; hybrid cottonwood and similar hardwood trees grown as crops and
harvested within 20 years of planting; and livestock, including both the animals
themselves and animal products including, but not limited to, meat, upland
finfish, poultry and poultry products, and dairy products.
(7) "Agricultural equipment" includes, but is not limited to, the following used
in agricultural operations:
(a) Equipment; machinery; constructed shelters, buildings, and ponds; fences;
upland finfish rearing facilities; water diversion, withdrawal, conveyance, and
use equipment and facilities including, but not limited to, pumps, pipes, tapes,
canals, ditches, and drains;
(b) Corridors and facilities for transporting personnel, livestock, and equipment
to, from, and within agricultural lands;
(c) Farm residences and associated equipment, lands, and facilities; and
(d) Roadside stands and on-farm markets for marketing fruit or vegetables.
(8) Agricultural facilities. See "Agricultural equipment."
Required change: Definitions in the SMP must be consistent with
the statute and Guidelines to ensure implementation of the SMP
consistent with the SMA. Existing agricultural activities are not
subject to the SMA under very specific language in RCW 90.58.065.
The definitions in this section of the RCW are used to define the
scope of the exception for agriculture, and include agricultural
activities, agricultural products, agricultural equipment, and
agricultural land. If the SMP addresses new agriculture, which the
Pasco SMP does, then it must contain these definitions. This change
is required for consistency with RCW 90.58.065 and WAC 173-26-
020(3). Page 372 of 465
ATTACHMENT 1: PASCO SMP PERIODIC REVIEW AMENDMENT – ECOLOGY INITIAL DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY 7/13/2023
Changes in red are required to comply with the Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) and the SMP Guidelines (WAC 173-26, Part III). Changes in blue are recommended and are consistent
with SMA policy and the SMP Guidelines. Single strikethrough and underline reflect the City’s proposed amendments; double strikethrough and double underline reflect Ecology changes.
Page 4 of 6
(5) "Agricultural activities" means agricultural uses and practices including, but
not limited to: producing, breeding, or increasing agricultural products;
rotating and changing agricultural crops; allowing land used for agricultural
activities to lie fallow in which it is plowed and tilled but left unseeded;
allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant as a result of
adverse agricultural market conditions; allowing land used for agricultural
activities to lie dormant because the land is enrolled in a local, state, or federal
conservation program, or the land is subject to a conservation easement;
conducting agricultural operations; maintaining, repairing, and replacing
agricultural equipment; maintaining, repairing, and replacing agricultural
facilities, provided that the replacement facility is no closer to the shoreline
than the original facility; and maintaining agricultural lands under production
or cultivation. Also see definition of "New Agricultural Activities" below.
(6) "Agricultural products" includes: but is not limited to horticultural,
viticultural, floricultural, and vegetable, fruit, berry, grain, hops, hay, straw,
turf, sod, seed, and apiary products; feed or forage for livestock; Christmas
trees; hybrid cottonwood and similar hardwood trees grown as crops and
harvested within 20 years of planting; and livestock, including both the animals
themselves and animal products including, but not limited to, meat, upland
finfish, poultry and poultry products, and dairy products.
(7) "Agricultural equipment" and “agricultural facilities” includes, but is not
limited to, the following used in agricultural operations:
(a) Equipment; machinery; constructed shelters, buildings, and ponds; fences;
upland finfish rearing facilities; water diversion, withdrawal, conveyance, and
use equipment and facilities including, but not limited to, pumps, pipes, tapes,
canals, ditches, and drains;
(b) Corridors and facilities for transporting personnel, livestock, and equipment
to, from, and within agricultural lands;
(c) Farm residences and associated equipment, lands, and facilities; and
(d) Roadside stands and on-farm markets for marketing fruit or vegetables.
(8) “Agricultural land” means those specific land areas on which agricultural
activities are conducted. Page 373 of 465
ATTACHMENT 1: PASCO SMP PERIODIC REVIEW AMENDMENT – ECOLOGY INITIAL DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY 7/13/2023
Changes in red are required to comply with the Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) and the SMP Guidelines (WAC 173-26, Part III). Changes in blue are recommended and are consistent
with SMA policy and the SMP Guidelines. Single strikethrough and underline reflect the City’s proposed amendments; double strikethrough and double underline reflect Ecology changes.
Page 5 of 6
ITEM SMP PROVISION BILL FORMAT CHANGES (UNDERLINE = ADDITIONS; STRIKETHROUGH = DELETIONS) DISCUSSION/RATIONALE
REQ-3 Section 2: Shoreline
Regulations-Article 1.
Authority and Purpose-
29.01.080 Definitions-
Floodway
“Floodway” means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the
adjacent land areas through which the base flood is discharged. Floodways
identified on flood boundary and floodway maps become “regulatory
floodways” within which encroachment of obstructions are prohibited.
“Floodway” means the area, as identified in a master program, that
has been established in a federal emergency management agency
flood insurance rate maps or floodway maps.
OR
“Floodway” means those portions of the area of a river valley lying
streamward from the outer limits of the watercourse…said floodway
being identified, under normal condition, by changes in the surface soil
conditions or changes in types or quality of vegetative ground cover
condition, topography, or other indicators of flooding that occurs with
reasonable regularity, although not necessarily annually.
Required change: The City’s definition of floodway appears to be
from the zoning code and is inconsistent with the narrower
definition of floodway as defined in WAC 173-26-020(20)(b).
Ecology finds that a change is required for consistency with WAC
173-26-020(20)(b). While it is within the City’s discretion to select
the SMA floodway definition instead of the FEMA definition, the
definition in the SMP must be consistent with RCW
90.58.030(2)(b)(ii).
Rec-2 Section 2: Shoreline
Regulations-Article 1.
Authority and Purpose-
29.01.080 Definitions-
Primitive Trail
“Primitive trail” means unimproved and unpaved, but physically defined
pathway for non motorized movement.”
“Primitive trail” means unimproved and unpaved, but physically defined
pathway for non motorized movement.”
Recommended change: This term is used in the SMP; the
recommended change reinstates the deleted definition.
Rec-3 Article V. Critical Areas-
29.01.520-Wetlands
-Table 29.01.520 (8)(a):
Wetland Buffer Width
Requirements
Category III Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 16-18 points for all functions)
Moderate level of
function for habitat
Low-75 ft No recommendations
at this time
Recommended change: Update for consistency with Ecology’s 2016
Wetland Guidance. Habitat score breaks should be updated for
consistency with Ecology’s analysis of the rating system break
points. This approach is particularly appropriate for use in an urban
environment. Page 374 of 465
ATTACHMENT 1: PASCO SMP PERIODIC REVIEW AMENDMENT – ECOLOGY INITIAL DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY 7/13/2023
Changes in red are required to comply with the Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) and the SMP Guidelines (WAC 173-26, Part III). Changes in blue are recommended and are consistent
with SMA policy and the SMP Guidelines. Single strikethrough and underline reflect the City’s proposed amendments; double strikethrough and double underline reflect Ecology changes.
Page 6 of 6
ITEM SMP PROVISION BILL FORMAT CHANGES (UNDERLINE = ADDITIONS; STRIKETHROUGH = DELETIONS) DISCUSSION/RATIONALE
(score for habitat 5 6-7
points)*
*if wetland scores 8-9
habitat points, use
Category II buffers
Score for habitat 3-4 5
Moderate-110 ft
High- 150 ft
Low- 40ft
Moderate-60 ft
High-80 ft
No recommendations
at this time
REQ-4 Article V Critical Areas –
29.01.520-Wetlands
Table 29.01.520 (8)(a):
Wetland Buffer
Requirements
Category I Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 22 points or more for all
functions or having the “Special Characteristics” identified in the
rating system)
Wetlands of High Conservation
Value, Bogs
Low – 125 feet
Moderate – 190 feet
High – 250 feet
Required change: Table 29.01.520 (8)(a) does not list bogs, which
per Ecology’s wetland guidance should be assigned the largest
buffers together with Wetlands of High Conservation Value. As
written, bogs would be assigned smaller buffers based on habitat
score, potentially resulting in net loss to shoreline ecological
functions. This change is required for consistency with WAC 173-26-
201(2)(a) and (2)(c).
Page 375 of 465
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 28, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 10/2/23
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4374 - Project Acceptance for Animal Shelter Frontage
Improvements (18th And Washington) Project
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4374, accepting work performed by
Double J. Inc., under contract for the Animal Shelter Frontage Improvements
(18th & Washington) Project.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
See below.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Animal Shelter Frontage Improvements (18th and Washington):
The project bid was awarded by Council action to Double J, Inc. of Richland, WA
on September 12, 2022, in the amount of $673,184.21. The project is now
complete and was constructed per project specifications. Four (4) change orders
were negotiated with the contractor during construction:
• Change Order No. 1 was necessary to change a portion of the sidewalk
material from asphalt to concrete. In an effort to match the anticipated
sidewalk material that would be used on-site, asphalt was included in the
bid design. The final design of the new Animal Shelter on-site
improvements included concrete sidewalks. The cost of this change order
was $6,160.00 and was based on the bid unit price for the concre te
sidewalk.
• Change Order No. 2 was to allow better access to an existing loading
dock for a business located at the corner of 18th and Washington. This
Page 376 of 465
change order provided payment for the contractor to install a culvert pipe
across a drainage swale. The cost of this change order was $1,974.50.
• Change Order No. 3 was needed to document the change in the contract
price as of 1/1/2023, which was caused by the increase of the Washington
State Sales Tax rate from 8.7% to 8.9%. Change Order No. 3 was
$271.59, bringing the total cost of additive change orders for this project
to $8,406.09.
• Change Order No. 4 was a “reconciliation" change order intended to
document the final bid item quantities the contractor used for all work
performed. Several bid items were not utilized as that work was
unnecessary for project completion. This resulted in a reduction in the
cost of the original contract items by $12,620. This, combined with all
change orders, there was a net change of ($4,213.91) to the project costs.
Final construction costs were $668,970.30.
Formal acceptance of public works projects is required by State law and start the
45-day period within which an outside vendor, supplier or laborer would have an
opportunity to file a claim against this project pursuant to RCW 60.28.011 (2).
Upon completion of the 45-day lien filing period, retainage being held by the City
may be released upon receipts of the following:
• An affidavit of no liens
• A release from the Department of Revenue that all taxes have been paid
• A release from any claims from the Department of Labor and Industries,
pursuant to RCW 60.28.051
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends City Council's acceptance of the project as constructed by the
above listed contractor.
Page 377 of 465
Resolution - TCACS Frontage Improvements Project Acceptance- 1
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY DOUBLE J, INC. UNDER
CONTRACT FOR THE ANIMAL SHELTER FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS
(18TH AND WASHINGTON) PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the work performed by Double J, Inc. , under contract for Project No. 17999A
has been examined by City of Pasco staff and been found to be in apparent compliance with the
applicable project specifications and drawings; and
WHEREAS, it is City Staff's recommendation that the City of Pasco formally accept the
contractor's work and the project as complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council concurs with Staff's recommendation and thereby accepts the work
performed by Double J, Inc.., under contract for Project No. 17999A as being completed in
apparent conformance with the project specifications and drawings.
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington
State Department of Revenue of this acceptance.
Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld, pursuant to
RCW 60.28.011, regulations and administrative process, shall be released upon apparent
compliance with and satisfaction of applicable project specifications and verification thereof by
Public Works Department staff and Finance Director.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2023.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 378 of 465
Pasco City Council Regular
Meeting
October 2, 2023Page 379 of 465
Animal Shelter Frontage Improvements (18th & Washington)
-Before Page 380 of 465
Animal Shelter
Frontage
Improvements
(18th &
Washington)
-During Page 381 of 465
Animal Shelter
Frontage
Improvements
(18th &
Washington)
-After Page 382 of 465
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 14, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 10/2/23
FROM: Jesse Rice, Director
Administrative & Community Services
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4375, Washington State Recreation & Conservation Office
Local Parks Maintenance Grant Application
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
Authorization Form
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4375, submission of a grant
application to the Washington State Recreation & Conservation Office for park
maintenance funding.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None - If Grant awarded, it will cover 100% of submitted project costs.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The State Legislature during its last session approved the appropriation of $5
million to fund a Local Park Maintenance Grant. This grant will focus on helping
communities in need address maintenance backlogs for key local parks facilities
and capital improvements. The focus of the grant is to help local parks
departments maintain their working facilities to meet the needs of their residents.
The legislature asked the Recreation and Conservation Office to administer the
grant.
The Grant will award $35K - $100K to the selected agencies with no-match
required. Grant funds will be awarded by Dec 2023 and are to be spent by June
2025.
Pasco parks have various basketball courts in neighborhood parks that are in
need of resurfacing. The Parks & Recreation Divisions would submit an
Page 383 of 465
application for the resurfacing of these courts. This project will promote safety
by eliminate tripping and slipping hazards on t he courts, community pride by
rejuvenating these courts, and active healthy lifestyles by increasing the
longevity of these community assets.
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends Council approve the submission of a grant application for park
maintenance funding and if awarded there is no match required for this funding.
Page 384 of 465
Resolution - _____ RCO Grant Application - 1
Version 09.01.23
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
APPROVING SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE
WASHINGTON STATE RECREATION AND CONSERVATION OFFICE FOR
PARK MAINTENANCE FUNDING.
WHEREAS, The City of Pasco (City) has various basketball courts within its park system
that are in need of resurfacing; and
WHEREAS, The State Legislature approved funds for a deferred park maintenance
activities grant and authorized the Recreation and Conservation Office to administer said grant; and
WHEREAS, These deferred park maintenance grant assistance funds are desired by the City
to aid in financing the cost of the court resurfacing project referenced above; and _______.
WHEREAS, The City Council understands that grant applicants are not required to provide
any matching resources.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City manager is authorized to execute the attached “Local Parks Maintenance
Program Applicant Authorization and Electronic Signature” form as contained herein as EXHIBIT
A. __________, and
Be It Further Resolved, that the _________________, and
Be It Further Resolved, that this resolution will take effect immediately.
Page 385 of 465
Resolution - _____ RCO Grant Application - 2
Version 09.01.23
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this 2nd___ day of
October_____, 2023_.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 386 of 465
Local Parks Maintenance Program
Applicant Authorization and Electronic Signature
Organization Name (sponsor)
Resolution No. or Document Name
Project Number and Name
This resolution/authorization authorizes the person(s) identified below (in Section 2) to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of our organization and to legally bind our organization with respect to the above Project for which we seek grant funding assistance managed through the Recreation and Conservation Office (Office).
WHEREAS grant assistance is requested by our organization to aid in financing the cost of the Project referenced above;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. Our organization has applied for or intends to apply for funding assistance managed by the Office for the above “Project.”
2. Our organization authorizes the following persons or persons holding specified titles/positions (and subsequent holders of those titles/positions) to execute the
following documents binding our organization on the above projects:
Grant Document Routing Order Name of Signatory and Title of Person Authorized to Sign Email Address
Grant application (submission thereof)
Project contact (day-to-day administering of the grant and communicating with the RCO)
Agreement/amendment approver 1 Agreement/amendment approver Agreement/amendment approver Agreement/amendment approver RCO Grant Agreement signer 2 Agreement amendments signer2
Page 387 of 465
The above persons are considered an “authorized representative(s)/agent(s)” for purposes of the documents indicated. Our organization shall comply with a request from the RCO to provide updated documentation of authorized signers, if needed.
3. Our organization acknowledges and warrants, after conferring with its legal counsel, that its authorized representative(s)/agent(s) have full legal authority to act and sign on behalf of the organization for their assigned role/document.
4. Grant assistance is contingent on a signed Agreement. Entering into any Agreement with the Office is purely voluntary on our part.
5. Our organization understands that grant policies and requirements vary depending on the grant program applied to, the grant program and source of funding in the Agreement, the
characteristics of the project, and the characteristics of our organization.
6. Any grant assistance received will be used for only direct eligible and allowable costs that are reasonable and necessary to implement the project(s) referenced above.
7. Our organization acknowledges that the grant will only be used for maintenance of local park property owned by our organization.
8. This resolution/authorization is deemed to be part of the formal grant application to the Office.
9. Our organization warrants and certifies that this resolution/authorization was properly and lawfully adopted following the requirements of our organization and applicable laws and policies and that our organization has full legal authority to commit our organization to the warranties, certifications, promises, and obligations set forth herein. This resolution/authorization is signed and approved on behalf of the resolving body of our organization by the following authorized member(s): Signed
Title Date
On File at:
This Applicant Resolution/Authorization was adopted by our organization during the meeting held: Location: Date:
You may reproduce the above language in your own format; however, text may not change.
Page 388 of 465
1 Agreement/Amendment Approver: refers to an individual or several individuals who review and approve the
electronic document and contacts RCO if corrections are needed. The approver does not sign the document.
You may add more than one approver but please designate the order for routing purposes.
2 RCO Grant Agreement/Agreement Amendments Signer: refers to the individual who must officially sign the
document with an electronic signature and may be required to enter data such as title, date, agency name, etc.
into fields. The signer of Agreements may differ from the individual who is delegated to sign Amendment
documents, but we can only accept one signature per document.
Page 389 of 465
September 8, 2023
Brent Kubalek
Recreation Services Manager
City of Pasco
525 N.3rd Ave
Pasco, WA 99301
Re: Applicant Authorization and Electronic Signature Form Deadline Extension
Basketball Court Resurfacing, RCO #23-1695
Dear Brent Kubalek:
The Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) received your request, dated September 8, 2023,
for an extension to the Applicant Authorization and Electronic Signature Form Deadline for the
Local Parks Maintenance Grant Program. RCO requires grant applicants to submit the Applicant
Authorization and Electronic Signature Form by the application deadline of September 18, 2023.
Based upon the information included in your request, I hereby approve your Applicant
Authorization and Electronic Signature Form to be submitted by October 3, 2023, per the
authority granted in Washington Administrative Code 286-13-040.
If you have questions or need other assistance, please contact Jesse Sims, Outdoor Grants
Manager, at 360-867-8438 or jesse.sims@rco.wa.gov.
Sincerely,
Scott T. Robinson
Deputy Director
Scott Robinson (Sep 21, 2023 08:23 PDT)
Page 390 of 465
LMP Auth-Res Extension Letter City of Pasco
Final Audit Report 2023-09-21
Created:2023-09-20
By:Monica Atkins (monica.atkins@rco.wa.gov)
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAA1q3orqnNLDQLdYCuuKVEh8ChakAk60mN
"LMP Auth-Res Extension Letter City of Pasco" History
Document created by Monica Atkins (monica.atkins@rco.wa.gov)
2023-09-20 - 9:45:56 PM GMT
Document emailed to Scott Robinson (scott.robinson@rco.wa.gov) for signature
2023-09-20 - 9:46:38 PM GMT
Email viewed by Scott Robinson (scott.robinson@rco.wa.gov)
2023-09-21 - 3:23:11 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Scott Robinson (scott.robinson@rco.wa.gov)
Signature Date: 2023-09-21 - 3:23:17 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2023-09-21 - 3:23:17 PM GMT
Page 391 of 465
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 27, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 10/2/23
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Proclaiming October 2023 as National Disability Employment Awareness
Month
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proclamation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Mayor Barajas will read the proclamation for "National Disability Employment
Awareness Month" scheduled for October 2023 and present the proclamation to
Anthony Contreras-Sanchez, Training and TA Manager with the Washington
Initiative for Supported Employment (WISE).
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Proclamations issued by the Mayor of the City of Pasco provide an opportunity
for the City to recognize exceptional events. The goal of a proclamation is to
recognize and celebrate the extraordinary achievements of Pasco community
members and non-profit organizations, honor occasions of importance and
significance, and increase public awareness of issues to improve the well-being
of the people of this city.
Information on how to request proclamations is available on the City's website
(also attached) to provide equitable opportunity for community members and
organizations to have their events and achievements recognized and celebrated.
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 392 of 465
Mayor Barajas will present the proclamation to Anthony Contreras-Sanchez, with
the Washington Initiative for Supported Employment (WISE).
Also attending will be representatives from the following local organizations
supporting individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities with
employment support and community inclusion services:
• The ARC of Tri-Cities
• Goodwill OTC
• Responding to Autism
• Compass Career Solutions
This group of agencies provide supported employment services in both Benton
& Franklin Counties. Their services are funded by state and federal match,
through the Washington State Department of Social and Health Service -
Developmental Disabilities Administration ( DSHS-DDA) to the counties. The
Benton County Human Services Division oversees Tri-Cities region service
providers.
Page 393 of 465
Proclamation
“National Disability Awareness Month”
October 2023
WHEREAS, October 2023 marks the 78th anniversary of National Disability Employment Awareness
Month; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of National Disability Employment Awareness Month is to educate about
disability employment issues and celebrate the many and varied contributions of America's workers with
disabilities; and
WHEREAS, the history of National Disability Employment Awareness Month traces back to 1945
when Congress enacted a law declaring the first week in October each year "National Employ the
Physically Handicapped Week;" and
WHEREAS, in 1962, the word "physically" was removed to acknowledge the employment needs and
contributions of individuals with all types of disabilities; and
WHEREAS, in 1988, Congress expanded the week to a month and changed the name to National
Disability Employment Awareness Month; and
WHEREAS, workplaces welcoming of the talents of all people, including people with disabilities, are
a critical part of the efforts to build an inclusive community and strong economy; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco is committed to Employment for ALL, and calls upon employers,
schools, and other community organizations to observe October as National Disability Employment
Awareness Month and advance its’ message that people with disabilities add value and talent to our
workplaces and communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Blanche Barajas, Mayor of the City of Pasco, Washington, do hereby proclaim
October 2023 as,
“National Disability Employment Awareness Month”
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Official Seal of the City of
Pasco, State of Washington, to be affixed the 2nd day of October, 2023.
Blanche Barajas, Mayor
City of Pasco
Page 394 of 465
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 28, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 10/2/23
FROM: Darcy Buckley, Finance Director
Finance
SUBJECT: General Fund Monthly Report - August 2023
I. REFERENCE(S):
General Fund Report
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
N/A
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Attached is the General Fund financial update through August 2023.
The General Fund is a major fund of the City. It is the primary governmental fund
of the City and reflects all revenues and expenditures not accounted for in
another fund. The administration provides quarterly reports to Council for other
funds.
V. DISCUSSION:
Please view the attached report for details.
Page 395 of 465
August 2023
Monthly
General Fund
Report
Prepared by Darcy Buckley, Finance Director
Page 396 of 465
Type 2022
Count 2022 Value 2023
Count
2023
Value
Change
Count Value
Commercial 371 $76.37M 350 $191.8M -5.7%151.1%
Industrial 46 20.56M 44 16.95M -4.3%-17.6%
Mobile
Home 5 505K 4 440K -20.0%-12.9%
Residential 1,572 97.07M 1,570 71.45M -0.1%-26.1%
Total 1,994 $194.51M 1,968 $280.94M -1.3%44.4%
Building Permit Activity
Year-to-Date Building Permit Activity - Comparative
General Fund Financial Report / Page 2
Local Bounti's greenhouse construction,
two (2) multifamily residential apartment complexes that are being built in the northwest
part of town,
a few City projects, including Animal Control Facility and Wastewater Treatment Plant
Improvements,
Darigold's Production Facility located in the Port of Pasco's Reimann Center,
Pasco School District Comprehensive High School #3,
Various other business professional and business service investment.
The table above reflects year-to-date activity for the years 2022 and 2023. In comparing the
totals through August month end of the two years, the total permit count is lower by a little
over one percent, while the value of the permits has increase by 44.4%.
Projects contributing to the large permit value are related to projects, including:
Single Family Dwelling Unit activity in August reflected the highest month permit count thus
far in 2023.
Page 397 of 465
Year YTD July
End
Month of
Aug Total % 2023
Change
2021 10,028,641 1,499,004 11,527,646 15.41%
2022 13,063,444 1,881,568 14,945,012 -10.97%
2023 11,301,884 2,002,815 13,304,698
The sales tax rate applied to City of Pasco retail sales is 8.9%. January 2023
reflected the first month of tax collection of .2% to benefit the Pasco Public
Facilities District, a voter approved tax to support construction of an Aquatic
Center.
The City of Pasco receives a share of Regular and Optional sales tax (1%), Criminal
Justice (0.1%), and Public Safety (0.3%). Taxes that make up the majority of the
8.9% rate are distributed to the State and to Franklin County.
The City receives 85% of the 1% Regular and Optional sales tax. Criminal Justice
and Public Safety sales tax is distributed to the City by Franklin County based on
different distribution methods prescribed by State of Washington laws and
weighted by population.
Over the past many years the City has benefitted from construction sales tax
generated from major permitting activities, especially construction by large
commercial and industrial partners. These taxes are one-time in nature but the
City anticipates more of these large scale projects to help increase its sales tax
base for the next few years. Below is a comparison of monthly receipts by year.
2023 revenues are greater than those of 2021, but below 2022 collection. One
large scale project of 2022 attributes for the tax revenue difference.
Sales Tax
General Fund Financial Report / Page 3
General Fund Financial Report / Page 3
Page 398 of 465
Transaction Type YTD July
2023
August
2023
Total YTD
2023
% of Sales
Tax Receipts
Motor Vehicle & Parts
Dealers $2,831,085 $457,287 $3,288,372 24.72%
Merchant Wholesalers 862,355 125,090 987,445 7.42%
Construction of
Buildings 860,918 333,534 1,194,452 8.98%
Sporting Goods,
Hobbies, Book, Misc 769,371 111,950 881,321 6.62%
Food Services &
Drinking 703,651 115,884 819,535 6.16%
Specialty Trade 644,679 121,780 766,459 5.76%
General Merchandise
Retailers 474,299 72,725 547,024 4.11%
Building Materials &
Garden Supplies 429,057 76,133 505,190 3.80%
Administrative Services 366,440 50,264 416,705 3.13%
Furniture, Home
Electronics &
Appliances
296,609 49,275 345,884 2.60%
Remaining % from
Other Transactions $3,063,418 $488,892 $3,552,311 26.70%
Sales Tax Distribution - 2023
Top Ten by Category - Remaining Consolidated.
General Fund Financial Report / Page 4 Page 399 of 465
Category Biennial Budget YTD August
2023 % Received
Retail Sales Tax $44,450,700 $9,975,036 22.44%
Retail Sales Tax - Public
Safety & Criminal Justice 8,780,000 2,257,517 25.71%
Utility Tax 24,204,918 7,587,806 31.35%
Property Tax 25,863,203 7,346,493 28.41%
Other Tax 2,392,852 841,383 35.16%
Licenses & Permits 7,481,532 2,216,368 29.62%
Intergovernmental 7,194,296 2,326,189 32.33%
Charges for Goods &
Services 19,688,841 6,378,961 32.40%
Fines & Penalties 1,790,529 550,686 30.76%
Miscellaneous 1,828,814 1,047,225 57.26%
Interfund Loan Proceeds 113,201 1,125 0.99%
Transfers & Subsidies 35,796,816 91,261 0.25%
Total 179,585,702 40,620,050 22.62%
Without Debt Proceeds 144,585,702 28.09%
Revenue Budget Comparison
General Fund Financial Report / Page 5 Page 400 of 465
Category Biennial Budget YTD August
2023 % Spent
Salaries & Wages $69,105,320 $20,056,712 29.02%
Personnel Benefits 21,926,457 6,759,072 30.83%
Supplies 7,575,060 2,226,074 29.38%
Services 42,311,311 16,352,475 38.65%
Transfers &
Subsidies 44,820,637 3,903,833 8.71%
Capital Outlays 3,811,075 1,526,150 40.04%
Debt Service 10,154,708 499,018 4.91%
Total 199,704,568 $51,323,332 25.70%
Expense - Year-to-Date
As of August month-end, the elapsed time is approximately 33% of the biennium.
Capital outlays have been incurred at as work is completed. Of the remaining expense
categories only Services are over the 38.65% time in biennium. A portion of this
accelerated expense recognition is related to expenses paid at the beginning of each
year, like insurance and software maintenance contracts. In a few departments, other
expense categories that typically occur throughout the year are ahead of expected
spending. Those items include operations and maintenance expenses for City vehicles
and equipment, repair and maintenance service contract work, external contracts
directly tied to plan review for large scale development projects, and temporary
services. These expense elements are being reviewed as part of the mid-biennium
adjustment.
General Fund Financial Report / Page 7General Fund Financial Report / Page 6 Page 401 of 465
Project Allocation Actual
Pasco Chamber of
Commerce $1,915,193 $1,915,193
Franklin PUD/City of Pasco 1,050,000 1,094,837
Basin Disposal 110,000 71,768
Resource Specialist 450,000 119,899
Water System Improvements 9,000,000 5,683,716
Pasco Resource Navigator 625,000 85,500
Workforce Training 20,000 7,700
Pasco Specialty Kitchen 500,000 92,880
Outdoor dining/lighting 100,000 22,343
MLK Center Remodel*2,500,000 0
Boys & Girls Club*1,260,000 0
Total $17,530,193 $9,093,836
General Fund Financial Report / Page 10
ARPA Update
*Further Council Discussion/Approval Needed
Grant Funds: $17,464,312
General Fund Financial Report / Page 7 Page 402 of 465
General Fund Financial Report / Page 8
Capital
Projects
M A J O R P R O J E C T S I N P R O G R E S S
General Fund provides support for
capital projects on a regular basis.
The fund also retains all Limited Tax
General Obligation bonds proceeds
and transfers those proceeds to
General Construction Fund as needed
per the accounting standards.
Fire Station 85 - Design and site work for
future Fire Station 85 site began in 2022.
For 2023, completion of the Fire Station is
anticipated. Funding available from a LTGO
bond issued in 2019 plus an issuance of
new debt financing in 2023 will support
construction spending. As of the end of
August spending is $5,703,368. Project is
expected to be completed beginning of
2024.
In the month of August, progress
related to construction of Fire Station
85 continued. A long anticipated
project for the construction of the
regional animal control facility is
underway in 2023.
Animal Control Facility - Funding for the
facility is shared between the three partner
municipalities; Pasco, Kennewick and
Richland. The City of Pasco issued a bond
in 2019 to support construction. The total
project budget is $6.4M. Funds previously
Council Approved will be carryover into the
2023-2024 Biennial Budget to provide
budget authority. As of the end of
August, spending totals $2,157,618.
Page 403 of 465
General Fund Financial Report / Page 9
Financial Outlook
Reviewing both revenue and expense activity as of August, both categories are
lagging as compared to time in biennium. The beginning stages of the mid-
biennium review are underway. As part of this analysis, results of actual
activity will be compared to budget by activity type to assess variance, reason
for deviation, and need for budgetary changes. Considered as part of the
evaluation are expected timing of receipts and spending. Depending up results
of assessment adjustments, included reductions in budgeted revenue and
expense, may be determined prudent and presented to Council. Where
possible, staff aims to offset identified budgetary expense needs with available
budgetary savings.
A planning effort related to General Fund Long Term Planning is underway.
This study will result in creation of a tool to help evaluate General Fund
programming and revenue requirements while considering a longer term
planning horizon. As part of the creation of the 2023-2024 biennial budget, a
net reduction of General Fund ending fund balance was identified in the
biennium. This ending fund balance availability existed due to years where
revenues exceeded expenses. This use of existing ending fund balance included
one time spending including anticipated debt service associated with the
planned debt issuance of bonds for the Broadmoor Tax Increment Financing
(TIF) Area improvements and other one-time capital expenditures. To prepare
for future budget years, the General Fund Long Term Plan will consider
revenue requirements for debt service associated with TIF area during
development, evaluate the potential impact of other service level
improvements and evaluate the need for ongoing revenues to support ongoing
expenses in relation to potential changes.
Page 404 of 465
G e n e r a l F u n d F i n a n c i a l R e p o r t /P a g e 1 0 Page 405 of 465
Pasco City Council Meeting
October 2, 2023Page 406 of 465
General Fund Financial Report through
August 31, 2023Page 407 of 465
Building Permit Activity -Count
Year-to-Date Building Permit Activity -Comparative
Commercial Industrial Mobile Homes Residential Total
2022 Count 371 46 5 1,572 1,994
2023 Count 350 44 4 1,570 1,968
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Page 408 of 465
Building Permit Activity –Value
Year-to-Date Building Permit Activity -Comparative
Commercial Industrial Mobile Homes Residential Total
2022 Permit Value $76,370,699 $20,566,540 $505,000 $97,068,842 $194,511,082
2023 Permit Value $191,798,517 $16,950,816 $440,000 $71,748,477 $280,937,809
$-
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
$300,000,000
Page 409 of 465
Year YTD July End Month of August Total YTD Aug 2023 Over/(Under)
2021 $10,028,641 $1,499,004 $11,527,646 15.41%
2022 13,063,444 1,881,568 14,945,012 (10.97)%
2023 $11,301,884 $2,002,815 $13,304,698
Sales Tax –As Received*
Across sales categories receipts remain consistent. The most impactful change between the
years is related to a large construction project in 2022. This project’s tax represents shortfall.
*Includes sales tax revenue received in 2023 for 2022 sales.Page 410 of 465
Sales Tax –As Received*
*Includes sales tax revenue received in 2023 for 2022 sales.
$-
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
January February March April May June July August
2021 Tax Receipts 2022 Tax Receipts 2023 Tax ReceiptsPage 411 of 465
Sales Tax Collections through August 2023
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers
25%
Construction of Buildings
9%
Merchant Wholesalers,
Durable Goods
7%
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical
Instrument, Book, and
Miscellaneous Retailers
7%
Food Services and Drinking Places
6%
Specialty Trade Contractors
6%
General Merchandise Retailers
4%
Building Material and Garden
Equipment and Supplies Dealers
4%
Administrative and Support
Services
3%
Furniture, Home Furnishings,
Electronics, and Appliance
Retailers
2%
Remaining Business Categories
27%Page 412 of 465
General Fund Revenue Budget Comparison
Reflects for 2023 sales tax revenue only.
Charges for
Goods and
Services
Debt Principal Fine and
Penalties
General
Property Tax
Intergovernme
ntal
Licenses &
Permits Miscellaneous Other Tax Retail Sales Tax
Retail Sales Tax
- Public Safety
& Criminal
Justice
Transfers and
Subsidy -
Revenue
Utility Tax
Sum of 2023-2024 Amended Budget $19,688,841 $113,201 $1,790,529 $25,863,203 $7,194,296 $7,481,532 $1,828,814 $2,392,852 $44,450,700 $8,780,000 $35,796,816 $24,204,918
Sum of 2023 Transactions $6,378,961 $1,125 $550,686 $7,346,493 $2,326,189 $2,216,368 $1,047,225 $841,383 $9,975,036 $2,257,517 $91,261 $7,587,806
$-
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
$45
$50
MillionsPage 413 of 465
General Fund Expense Budget Comparison
Capital Outlays Debt Interest Debt Principal Personnel Benefits Salaries and Wages Services Supplies Transfers and
Subsidy - Expense
Sum of 2023-2024 Amended Budget $3,811,075 $1,952,408 $8,202,300 $21,926,457 $69,105,320 $42,311,311 $7,575,060 $44,820,637
Sum of 2023 Transactions $1,526,150 $499,018 $-$6,759,072 $20,056,712 $16,352,475 $2,226,074 $3,903,833
$-
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
MillionsPage 414 of 465
Project Status Allocation Spent
Pasco Chamber of Commerce –Business Grant Complete $1,915,193 $1,915,193
Franklin PUD/City of Pasco –Utilities Grant Complete 1,050,000 1,094,837
Basin Disposal –Utilities Grant Complete 110,000 71,768
Resource Specialist Ongoing 450,000 119,899
Water System Capital Improvements Ongoing 9,000,000 5,683,716
Workforce Training Ongoing 20,000 7,700
Resource Navigator Ongoing 625,000 85,500
Pasco Specialty Kitchen Ongoing 500,000 92,880
Outdoor Dining/Lighting Ongoing 100,000 22,343
Total Allocated $13,770,193 $9,093,836
ARPA Update
Remaining Funds Under Council
Consideration
Remaining ARPA
available
$3,694,119
Project Potential
Funding
MLK Center Capital
Project
2,500,000
Boys & Girls Club 1,260,000
Prospective Allocation
Available/(Shortfall)
$-65,881Page 415 of 465
Financial Outlook
•City wide activity through the end of August 2023, approximately
33% of biennium.
•Revenues 22.62% of biennial budget. Excluding debt proceeds,
28.09%
•Expenses 25.70% of biennial budget
•Tax revenues for the most part meeting budgetary expectation. Sales
tax under 2022 YTD due to large construction project of 2022. Other
tax categories are in line with budget expectations.
•Only operational category of expenses are ahead of time in biennium
are services. Page 416 of 465
Big Picture: Tasks in Progress
•Connection fees analysis. Fees support growth –represents buy-in to
infrastructure paid by current rate payers.
•City-wide collaborative Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) planning is
progressing.
•Mid-biennium review beginning. Results in review of activity and
trends to identify any of areas of needed adjustment.
•General Fund Long Term Planning effort underway.Page 417 of 465
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 29, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 10/2/23
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 4686 & Resolution No. 4373 – Budget Amendment & GSI
Water Solutions, Inc. Agreement for the Pasco Aquifer Storage and
Recovery Feasibility Study Phase 2 Project
I. REFERENCE(S):
Ordinance
Resolution
Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4686, amending the 2023-2024
Biennial Pasco, of the of City No. (Ordinance Budget Operating 4619)
additional provide to thereto: a providing by Washington, supplement
appropriation in the City’s Water Utility Fund for the Aquifer Storage and
Recovery Feasibility Study – Phase 2 project and, further, authorize publication
by summary only.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4373, authorizing the execution of
the agreement with GSI Water Solutions, Inc. for the Aquifer Storage and
Recovery Feasibility Phase 2 project.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
The City was awarded a 100% grant in the amount of $348,967.00 from the
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) for the Aquifer Storage
and Recovery (ASR) Feasibility Study - Phase II Project.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City of Pasco (City) is evaluating the feasibility of developing an ASR
program that would allow storing surplus water available from the City’s existing
Page 418 of 465
supply sources in aquifers beneath the City for use during periods of peak -
season demand.
The concept for a potential future Pasco ASR program would include
withdrawing water from existing supply sources (Columbia River or groundwater
wells) during the winter months when demands for water are low, injecting and
storing that water in an aquifer system beneath the City using a well or series of
wells, and recovering the stored water from those same wells to meet peak
summer demands. This would allow the City to augment peak-season demand
needs and help meet projected demand shortfalls without increasing permitted
withdrawals from the Columbia River during the low-flow summer months.
Building upon existing and available information compiled and evaluated as part
of the initial Pasco ASR feasibility study, this next phase of the study will address
hydrogeologic and water quality data gaps identified for the two candidate basalt
storage aquifers prior to conducting any site-specific exploratory or test well
drilling investigations and will complete a preliminary water quality evaluation to
assess geochemical compatibility between source water and basalt
groundwater.
Recommended next steps prior to conducting any site -specific drilling and
testing investigations include:
1. conducting reconnaissance surveys of key basalt wells in the area,
2. collecting and analyzing ASR supply water and proxy groundwater quality
samples, and
3. completing a geochemical compatibility assessment to evaluate for
potential adverse geochemical reactions between ASR supply water and
groundwater and to identify contaminants likely to exceed groundwater
quality criteria or baseline groundwater quality conditions.
This project will build upon work completed by GSI Water Solutions, Inc. under
the Pasco ASR Feasibility Study Phase I project.
V. DISCUSSION:
The goal of a potential future Pasco ASR program would be to maintain robust
and sustainable long-term water supplies for the City of Pasco without expanding
use of summer dry-season sources. By utilizing existing water rights in times of
surplus supply to store water for later use, the City can optimize its supply
portfolio in an environmentally sustainable way.
Staff recommends approval of the agreement with GSI Water Solutions, Inc. for
the ASR Phase II Project.
Page 419 of 465
Ordinance – 2023 – 2024 Operating Budget Amendment for ASR Phase II Project - 1
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING THE 2023-2024 BIENNIAL OPERATING BUDGET
(ORDINANCE NO. 4619), BY PROVIDING SUPPLEMENT THERETO; TO
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION IN THE CITY’S WATER
UTILITY FUND.
WHEREAS, on November 28, 2022, the Pasco City Council approved Ordinance No.
4619, adopting the 2023-2024 Biennial Operating Budget; and
WHEREAS, the 2023-2024 Biennial Operating Budget did not include any appropriation
for the Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Feasibility Study Phase II project due to not yet
knowing if the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) approved the ASR Phase I
study; and
WHEREAS, Ecology has since approved the ASR Phase I study and recommends moving
forward with Phase II of the ASR Feasibility Study; and
WHEREAS, Ecology has awarded a 100% reimbursable grant in the amount of
$348,967.00 to cover the cost of the ASR Feasibility Study Phase II project; and
WHEREAS, in acknowledgement of the offered grant funding, the City desires the 2023-
2024 Biennial Operating Budget to reflect the expenditure of these additional funds for the ASR
Phase II project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to RCW 35A.34.200(1)(d), as follows:
Fund EXPENDITURE REVENUE
Water Utility Fund $348,967.00 $348,967.00
Total $348,967.00 $$348,967.00
Page 420 of 465
Ordinance – 2023 – 2024 Operating Budget Amendment for ASR Phase II Project - 2
Section 2. That the additions in appropriations and expenditures are hereby declared
to exist in the above funds for the said uses and purposes as shown above, and the proper City
officials are hereby authorized and directed to issue warrants and transfer funds in accordance
with the provision of the Ordinance.
Section 3. Except as amended herein, Ordinance No. 4619 as previously adopted
heretofore shall remain unchanged.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word
of this ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this ordinance.
Section 5. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including scrivener’s errors
or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or federal laws, rules, or regulations; or
numbering or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take full force and
effect five (5) days after approval, passage, and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of ______,
2023.
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Published: ___________________________
Page 421 of 465
Resolution - GSI Water Solution ASR Ph II Agreement - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND EXECUTE AN
AGREEMENT WITH GSI WATER SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE AQUIFER
STORAGE AND RECOVERY FEASIBILITY STUDY PHASE II PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City pf Pasco (City) is evaluating the feasibility of developing an Aquifer
Storage and Recovery (ASR) program that would allow storing surplus water available from the
City’s existing supply sources in aquifers beneath the City for use during periods of peak-season
demand; and
WHEREAS, on October 29, 2020, after being properly selected through a Request for
Qualifications process, the City entered into a contract with GSI Water Solutions, Inc. for the
Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Feasibility Study Phase I Project; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) has agreed to the
results of the Phase I study and recommends moving forward with Phase II of the ASR Feasibility
Study and gather more information on the feasibility of developing an ASR in Pasco; and
WHEREAS, the ASR Feasibility Study Phase II project will build upon work completed
under the first phase of the Pasco ASR Feasibility Study; and
WHEREAS, to help fund this second phase, the City applied for and received a 100%
funding award from Ecology in the amount of $348,967.00 through the Office of Columbia River;
and
WHEREAS, these funds will be used to gather additional information to fill key data gaps
identified during the initial Pasco ASR Feasibility Phase I Study prior to conducting any site-
specific exploratory drilling and testing investigations to further assess feasibility and to guide a
future ASR drilling and testing program; and
WHEREAS, on March 6, 2023, Council approved the City entering into an Agreement
with Ecology that outlined the scope of work for the Phase II project; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends entering a second Agreement with GSI Water Solutions,
Inc. to complete the scope of work approved by Ecology for the ASR Phase II project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into a second
Agreement to complete the scope of work approved by Ecology for the ARS Phase II project with
GSI Water Solutions, Inc.
Page 422 of 465
Resolution - GSI Water Solution ASR Ph II Agreement - 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions
of the Agreement between the City of Pasco and GSI Water Solutions, Inc. as attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Section 2. That the City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby authorized,
empowered, and directed to sign and execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Pasco; and
to make minor substantive changes as necessary to execute the Agreement
Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force immediately upon
passage by the City Council.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2023.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 423 of 465
Professional Services Agreement – GSI Water Solutions, Inc. Agreement No. 23-013
Aquifer Storage & Recovery Feasibility Study
Version 09.13.23 Page 1 of 9
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Aquifer Storage & Recovery Feasibility Study – Phase 2
Agreement No. 23-013
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into between the City of Pasco, a Washington
Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “City”, and GSI Water Solutions, Inc.,
hereinafter referred to as “Consultant,” on the _______ day of _________________, 2023.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City desires to have certain services and/or tasks performed as set forth
below requiring specialized skills, training, equipment, and other supportive capabilities; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant represents that it is qualified and possesses sufficient skills,
experience, equipment, and necessary capabilities, including: technical and professional expertise,
when required, to perform the services and/or tasks as set forth in this Agreement upon which the
City is relying.
WHEREAS, the City has, consistent with RCW 39.80, published an announcement related
to its need for Architectural and Engineering services, evaluated Consultant’s current performance
data, and has determined that Consultant is the most highly qualified firm to perform the
Architectural and Engineering services related to the Aquifer Storage & Recovery project; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Public Works Director finds that the Agreement with Consultant
is both fair and reasonable in light of the duties to be performed, the Consultant’s performance
data, and the nature and complexity of the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, and performances
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Scope of Services. The Consultant shall perform such services and accomplish such tasks,
including the furnishing of all labor, materials, facilities and equipment necessary for full
performance thereof, as identified and designated as Consultant’s Responsibilities
throughout this Agreement, and as more particularly described in Scope of Work detailed
in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “Project”).
2. Term. This Project shall begin on the execution date listed above and promptly be
completed by 12/31/2024.
3. Compensation and Payment.
3.1 Payment for services provided hereunder shall be made following the performance
of such services. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or
services rendered, and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals
necessary to complete the Project.
Page 424 of 465
Professional Services Agreement – GSI Water Solutions, Inc. Agreement No. 23-013
Aquifer Storage & Recovery Feasibility Study
Version 09.13.23 Page 2 of 9
3.2 No payment shall be made for any services rendered by the Consultant except for
services identified and set forth in this Agreement except as may be authorized by
a written supplemental agreement approved by the City.
3.3 The City shall pay the Consultant for work performed under this Agreement upon
timely submitted invoices detailing work performed and expenses for which
reimbursement is sought. The City shall approve all invoices before payment is
issued. Payment shall occur within thirty (30) days of receipt and approval of an
invoice.
3.4 The City shall pay the Consultant for all work performed and expenses incurred
under this Agreement, as follows.
☒ Hourly (Multiple Rate): Such rates as identified on Exhibit B, plus actual
expenses incurred as provided under this Agreement, but not to exceed a
total of $348,967.00 without the prior written authorization by the City.
4. Reports and Inspections.
4.1 The Consultant at such times and in such forms as the City may require, shall
furnish to the City such statements, records, studies, surveys, reports, data, and
information as the City may request pertaining to matters covered by this
Agreement.
4.2 The Consultant shall, at any time during normal business hours and as often as the
City or the Washington State Auditor may reasonably deem necessary, make
available for examination all of its records and data with respect to all matters
covered, directly or indirectly, by this Agreement and shall permit the City, or its
designated authorized representative to audit and inspect other data relating to all
matters covered by this Agreement. The City shall receive a copy of all audit
reports made by the agency or firm as to the Consultant’s activities. The City may,
at its discretion, conduct an audit at its expense, using its own or outside auditors,
of the Consultant’s activities which relate, directly or indirectly, to this Agreement.
Consultant shall be provided a copy of such reports.
4.3 The Consultant, during the term of this Agreement, shall obtain all permits and
registration documents necessary for the performance of its work and for the
execution of services at its own expense, and shall maintain its validity. Upon
request, the Consultant shall deliver to the City copies of these licenses, registration
documents, and permits or proof of their issuance or renewal.
4.4 Consultant shall maintain books, records and documents, which sufficiently and
properly reflect all direct and indirect costs related to the performance of this
Agreement, and shall maintain such accounting procedures and practices as may be
necessary to assure proper accounting of all funds paid pursuant to this Agreement.
Page 425 of 465
Professional Services Agreement – GSI Water Solutions, Inc. Agreement No. 23-013
Aquifer Storage & Recovery Feasibility Study
Version 09.13.23 Page 3 of 9
These records shall be subject, at all reasonable times, to inspection, review, or
audit as provided above.
4.5 The Consultant shall retain all books, records, documents or other material relevant
to this Agreement for three (3) years after its expiration. Consultant agrees that the
City, or its designee, shall have full access and right to examine any of said
materials at all reasonable times during this period.
5. Ownership and Use of Documents.
5.1 All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data, information, drawings and documents
made, collected, or prepared by the Consultant for performing the services subject
to this Agreement, as well as any final product, collectively referred to as “work
product,” shall be deemed as the exclusive property of the City, including copyright
as secured thereon. Consultant may not use them except in connection with the
performance of the services under this Agreement or with the prior written consent
of the City. Any prior copyrighted materials owned by the Consultant and utilized
in the performance of the services under this Agreement, or embedded in with the
materials, products and services provided thereunder, shall remain the property of
the Consultant subject to a license granted to the City for their continued use of the
products and services provided under this Agreement. Any work product used by
the Consultant in the performance of these services which it deems as
“confidential,” “proprietary,” or a “trade secret” shall be conspicuously designated
as such.
5.2 In the event of Consultant’s default, or in the event that this Agreement is
terminated prior to its completion, the work product of the Consultant, along with
a summary of the services performed to date of default or termination, shall become
the property of the City, and tender of the work product and summary shall be a
prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary of services
provided shall be prepared at no additional cost, if the Agreement is terminated
through default by the Consultant. If the Agreement is terminated through
convenience by the City, the City agrees to pay Consultant for the preparation of
the summary of services provided.
6. Public Records.
6.1 Consultant acknowledges that the City is an agency subject to Chapter 42.56 RCW
“Public Records Act.” All preliminary drafts or notes prepared or gathered by the
Consultant, and recommendations of the Consultant are exempt prior to the
acceptance by the City or public citation by the City in connection with City action.
6.2 If the Consultant becomes a custodian of public records of the City and request for
such records is received by the City, the Consultant shall respond to the request by
the City for such records within five (5) business days by either providing the
records, or by identifying in writing the additional time necessary to provide the
Page 426 of 465
Professional Services Agreement – GSI Water Solutions, Inc. Agreement No. 23-013
Aquifer Storage & Recovery Feasibility Study
Version 09.13.23 Page 4 of 9
records with a description of the reasons why additional time is needed. Such
additional time shall not exceed twenty (20) business days unless extraordinary
good cause is shown.
6.3 In the event the City receives a public records request for protected work product
of the Consultant within its possession, the City shall, prior to the release of any
protected work product or as a result of a public records request or subpoena,
provide Consultant at least ten (10) business days prior written notice of the pending
release and to reasonably cooperate with any legal action which may be initiated
by the Consultant to enjoin or otherwise prevent such release.
7. Independent Contractor Relationship.
7.1 The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship is created by this
Agreement. The City is interested primarily in the results to be achieved; subject
to the scope of services and the specific requirements of this Agreement, the
implementation of services will lie solely with the discretion of the Consultant. No
agent, employee, officer or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be
an employee, agent, officer, or representative of the City for any purpose, and the
employees of the Consultant are not entitled to any of the benefits or privileges the
City provides for its employees. The Consultant will be solely and entirely
responsible for its acts and for the acts of its agents, employees, officers,
subcontractors or representatives during the performance of this Agreement.
7.2 In the performance of the services provided in this Agreement, Consultant is an
independent contractor with full authority to control and direct the performance of
the details of the work, however, the results of the work contemplated herein must
meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City’s general rights of
inspection and review to secure the satisfactory completion thereof.
7.3 The Consultant shall comply with all State and Federal laws including, but not
limited to:
7.3.1 The definition requirements of RCW 50.04.140 (Employment Security).
7.3.2 RCW 51.08.195 (Industrial Insurance).
7.3.3 Obtain a City of Pasco business license.
7.4 The City may, at its sole discretion, require the Consultant to remove any employee,
agent or servant from employment on this Project who, in the City’s sole discretion,
may be detrimental to the City’s interest.
Page 427 of 465
Professional Services Agreement – GSI Water Solutions, Inc. Agreement No. 23-013
Aquifer Storage & Recovery Feasibility Study
Version 09.13.23 Page 5 of 9
8. Indemnification.
8.1 The Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials, employees, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries,
damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the
acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement,
except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City.
8.2 However, should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement
is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out
of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the
concurrent negligence of the Consultant, and the City, its officers, officials,
employees, and volunteers, the Consultant’s liability, including the duty and cost
to defend, hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant’s negligence. It is
further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided
herein constitutes the Consultant’s waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance,
Title 51 RCW, solely for purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been
mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the
expiration or termination of this Agreement.
8.3 No liability shall attach to the City by reason of entering into this Agreement except
as expressly provided herein.
8.4 This indemnification shall include damages, penalties and attorney fees sustained
as a result of Consultant’s delayed or failed performance of Section 6 above.
9. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise
from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its
agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. The Consultant’s maintenance of
insurance as required by the Agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the
Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City’s
recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity.
9.1 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types and
coverage described below:
9.1.1 Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and
leased vehicles. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services
Office (ISO) form CA 00 01.
9.1.2 Commercial General Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as ISO
occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises,
operations, stop-gap independent contractors and personal injury and
advertising injury. The City shall be named as an additional insured under
the Consultant’s Commercial General Liability insurance policy with
Page 428 of 465
Professional Services Agreement – GSI Water Solutions, Inc. Agreement No. 23-013
Aquifer Storage & Recovery Feasibility Study
Version 09.13.23 Page 6 of 9
respect to the work performed for the City using an additional insured
endorsement at least as broad as ISO endorsement form CG 20 26.
9.1.3 Workers’ Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance
laws of the State of Washington.
9.1.4 Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession.
9.2 Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain the following
insurance limits:
9.2.1 Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for
bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident.
9.2.2 Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less
than:
☒ $2,000,000 each occurrence; and
☒ $2,000,000 general aggregate;
9.2.3 Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than:
☒ $2,000,000 per claim; and
☒ $2,000,000 policy aggregate limit;
9.3 Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant’s Automobile Liability, Professional
Liability, and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be
endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any
insurance, self-insurance, or self-insured pool coverage maintained by the City
shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
9.3.1 The Consultant’s insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not
be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice
by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
9.4 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best rating of not less than A: VII.
9.5 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including, but not
necessarily limited to, the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance
requirements of the Agreement before commencement of the work.
9.6 Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice
of any policy cancellation within two (2) business days of their receipt of such
notice.
Page 429 of 465
Professional Services Agreement – GSI Water Solutions, Inc. Agreement No. 23-013
Aquifer Storage & Recovery Feasibility Study
Version 09.13.23 Page 7 of 9
9.7 City Full Availability of Consultant Limits. If the Consultant maintains higher
insurance limits than the minimums shown above, the City shall be insured for the
full available limits of Commercial General and Excess or Umbrella liability
maintained by the Consultant, irrespective of whether such limits maintained by the
Consultant are greater than those required by this Agreement or whether any
certificate of insurance furnished to the City evidences limits of liability lower than
those maintained by the Consultant.
9.8 Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the
insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the
City may, after giving five (5) business days notice to the Consultant to correct the
breach, immediately terminate the Agreement or, at its discretion, procure or renew
such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any
sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of
the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City.
10. Nondiscrimination. In the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant will not
discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the grounds of race,
creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, age or the presence of any sensory, mental
or physical handicap; provided that the prohibition against discrimination in employment
because of handicap shall not apply if the particular disability prevents the proper
performance of the particular worker involved. The Consultant shall ensure that applicants
are employed, and that employees are treated during employment in the performance of
this Agreement without discrimination because of their race, creed, color, national origin,
sex, marital status, age or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap.
Consultant shall take such action with respect to this Agreement as may be required to
ensure full compliance with local, State and Federal laws prohibiting discrimination in
employment.
11. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that it has not employed
nor retained any company, firm, or person, other than a bona fide employee working
exclusively for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement; and that it has not paid
or agreed to pay any company, person or firm, other than a bona fide employee working
exclusively for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or
other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this
Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to
terminate this Agreement.
12. Assignment and Subcontracting.
12.1 The City has awarded this Agreement to the Consultant due to its unique
qualifications to perform these services. The Consultant shall not assign (or
subcontract other than as specifically identified in Exhibit A) its performance under
this Agreement or any portions of this Agreement without the prior written consent
Page 430 of 465
Professional Services Agreement – GSI Water Solutions, Inc. Agreement No. 23-013
Aquifer Storage & Recovery Feasibility Study
Version 09.13.23 Page 8 of 9
of the City, which consent must be sought at least thirty (30) days prior to the date
of any proposed assignment.
12.2 Any work or services assigned or subcontracted hereunder shall be subject to each
provision of this Agreement including Section 6, Public Records; Section 10,
Nondiscrimination; proper bidding procedures where applicable; and all local, State
and Federal statutes, ordinances and guidelines.
12.3 Any technical or professional service subcontract not listed in this Agreement, must
have prior written approval by the City.
13. Termination.
13.1 Termination for Convenience. Either party may terminate this Agreement for any
reason upon giving the other party no less than ten (10) business days written notice
in advance of the effective date of such termination.
13.2 Termination for Cause. If the Consultant fails to perform in the manner called for
in this Agreement, or if the Consultant fails to comply with any other provisions of
this Agreement and fails to correct such noncompliance within five (5) business
days of written notice thereof, the City may terminate this Agreement for cause.
Termination shall be effected by serving a notice of termination on the Consultant
setting forth the manner in which the Consultant is in default. The Consultant will
only be paid for services and expenses complying with the terms of this Agreement,
incurred prior to termination.
14. General Provisions.
14.1 For the purpose of this Agreement, time is of the essence.
14.2 Notice. Notice provided for in this Agreement shall be sent by:
14.2.1 Personal service upon the Project Administrators; or
14.2.2 Certified mail to the physical address of the parties, or by electronic
transmission to the e-mail addresses designated for the parties below.
14.3 The Project Administrator for the purpose of this Agreement shall be:
For the City: For the Consultant:
Steve M. Worley, P.E., or designee
Public Works Director
525 North 3rd
PO Box 293
Pasco WA 99301
WorleyS@pasco-wa.gov
Kenny Janssen, RG, LG., or designee
Principal Hydrogeologist
650 NE Holladay St Suite 900
Portland, OR 97232
kjanssen@gsiws.com
Page 431 of 465
Professional Services Agreement – GSI Water Solutions, Inc. Agreement No. 23-013
Aquifer Storage & Recovery Feasibility Study
Version 09.13.23 Page 9 of 9
15. Dispute Resolution.
15.1 This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and entered
into and delivered within the State of Washington and it is agreed by each party
hereto that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Washington.
15.2 In the event of a dispute regarding the enforcement, breach, default, or
interpretation of this Agreement, the Project Administrators, or their designees,
shall first meet in a good faith effort to resolve such dispute. In the event the dispute
cannot be resolved by agreement of the parties, said dispute shall be resolved by
arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, with both parties waiving the right
of a jury trial upon trial de novo, with venue placed in Pasco, Franklin County,
Washington. The substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable
attorney fees and costs as additional award and judgment against the other.
16. Nonwaiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation
provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other similar event or
other provision of this Agreement.
17. Integration. This Agreement between the parties consists in its entirety of this document
and any exhibits, schedules or attachments. Any modification of this Agreement or change
order affecting this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties.
18. Authorization. By signature below, each party warrants that they are authorized and
empowered to execute this Agreement binding the City and the Consultant respectively.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
date first written above.
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
Adam R. Lincoln – City Manager
CONSULTANT
Kenny Janssen, RG, LG – Principal Hydrogeologist
ATTEST:
Debra C. Barham, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC, City Attorney
Page 432 of 465
GSI Water Solutions, Inc. 650 NE Holladay Street, Suite 900, Portland, OR 97232 www.gsiws.com
Scope of Services and Fee Estimate
To: Dustin Wittman, Project Support Specialist / City of Pasco, WA
Copy: Steve Worley, PE, Public Works Director / City of Pasco, WA
From: Kenny Janssen, LG / GSI Water Solutions, Inc.
Walter Burt, LHG / GSI Water Solutions, Inc.
Date: May 18, 2023
RE: Aquifer Storage and Recovery Feasibility Study, City Project#: 20253,
Ecology#: WROCR-1921-Pasco-00015
Dustin –
This document presents a scope of work and associated fee estimate for GSI Water Solutions, Inc. (GSI) – and
our teaming partners RH2 Engineering, Inc. (RH2), INTERA, Inc. (INTERA), and WSP (formerly Golder Associates,
Inc.) – to continue providing professional hydrogeologic and engineering services to the City of Pasco (City) for
conducting Phase II of the City’s aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) feasibility study. GSI and its teaming partners
have developed this proposed scope of work and fee estimate based on the Water Resources Columbia River
Basin Water Management Agreement No. WROCR-2123-Pasco-00033 (Agreement) between the State of
Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) and the City.
Scope of Services
The City is evaluating the feasibility of developing an ASR program that would allow storing surplus water
available from the City’s existing supply sources in aquifers beneath the City for use during periods of peak-
season demand.
This next phase of the project will build upon work completed under the first phase of the Pasco ASR Feasibility
Study. The overall goal of this phase of the project is to fill key data gaps identified during the initial Pasco ASR
Feasibility Study prior to conducting any site-specific exploratory drilling and testing investigations to further
assess feasibility and to guide a future ASR drilling and testing program.
The proposed scope of services for Phase II of the ASR Feasibility Study is consistent with the Ecology-City
Agreement and will consist of three tasks:
Task 2 – Basalt Well Reconnaissance Surveys
Task 3 – Water Quality Evaluation
Task 4 – Phase II Pasco ASR Feasibility Study Report
Task 1 is reserved in the Agreement for City staff to administer the project and is not included in this scope of
services or fee estimate.
EXHIBIT A
Page 433 of 465
AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY FEASIBILITY STUDY, CITY PROJECT#: 20253,
GSI Water Solutions, Inc. 2
The following subsections describe the components and assumptions associated with each of the tasks listed
above. The estimated cost for each task and the total estimated project cost are provided in Table 1.
Task 2 – Basalt Well Reconnaissance Surveys
Three deep basalt wells identified as part of the initial feasibility study were recognized as key wells that could
potentially provide additional information to further assess ASR feasibility prior to designing and conducting any
site-specific exploratory drilling or basalt test well installations. The objective of this task is to facilitate filling key
hydrogeologic and water quality data gaps through a reconnaissance survey of the three basalt wells with the
purpose of further assessing ASR feasibility prior to designing and conducting any costly site-specific exploratory
drilling or basalt test well installations.
Specific work activities that our team will complete as part of this task will include:
Review water rights information and parcel maps to help identify the actual locations, owners and status
of the three wells.
Obtain and review drillers’ logs for the two wells understood to be located somewhere near the Tri-Cities
Airport that Durand & Son drilled in the early 1940’s for the U.S. Government. We understand that the
logs are not available in Ecology’s well log database and that the Durand family donated all their well logs
and notes to Whitman College.
Assist the City with contacting the owners for site access, as necessary.
Prepare for and conduct a site visit of the three basalt wells to evaluate their availability for video
surveying, groundwater level monitoring, pump testing, geophysical logging, and water quality sampling.
Prepare a draft technical memorandum and lead a presentation for Ecology that will summarize findings
and recommend next steps.
Prepare a final technical memorandum based on Ecology review/comment.
Should results indicate that the wells are available for evaluation and testing, a scope of work and budget
amendment for this task will be prepared and requested to conduct the following anticipated work activities:
Develop a work plan and Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for the recommended well evaluations,
testing and sampling activities. Development of the plans will be completed in close coordination with
and input from Ecology.
Prepare technical specifications for bidding/contracting a licensed water well contractor to assist with the
investigative work.
Develop a project-specific health and safety plan for field activities.
Provide field oversight for the recommended investigative activities and conduct field work according to
the approved work plan and QAPP.
Prepare a technical memorandum and lead a presentation for Ecology that will summarize work
completed and results from the investigation, and that will provide a recommendation to proceed with
Task 3 or to reevaluate next steps before moving forward.
Prepare a final technical memorandum based on Ecology review/comment.
Deliverables and Milestone Activities
The expected outcomes of this task include a confirmation on the location and status of the three key basalt
wells, summary of any additional hydrogeologic information discovered, and determination on whether the wells
could be accessed for video surveying, groundwater level monitoring, pump testing, geophysical logging, and/or
water quality sampling.
The primary deliverables and milestone activities for Task 2 are:
Page 434 of 465
AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY FEASIBILITY STUDY, CITY PROJECT#: 20253,
GSI Water Solutions, Inc. 3
Technical memorandum and presentation to Ecology.
Meeting notes from presentation.
Additional task deliverables will be identified through the budget amendment scoping process should any of the
wells be available for evaluation and/or testing.
Task Lead and Team Member Roles
Terry Tolan/INTERA and Kenny Janssen/GSI will co-lead Task 2. INTERA will be responsible for obtaining and
reviewing drillers’ logs from Whitman College and assisting with drafting the technical memorandum. GSI will be
responsible for reviewing water rights information and parcel maps, delivering the technical memorandum and
presentation, and developing recommended next steps. Kenny and Terry will prepare for and conduct a site visit
of the airport wells and the Welch’s well to evaluate their availability for video surveying, groundwater level
monitoring, pump testing, geophysical logging, and water quality sampling. Other key personnel and their work
activities include:
Kenny Janssen/GSI (task management and team coordination)
Walt Burt/GSI (review and quality assurance/quality control)
Fee Estimate and Assumptions
The estimated fee for this task is $55,103, and is based on the following assumptions:
Aside from any site visits, this task will be completed as a desktop study using readily available data
and/or published reports; no field data collection or subsurface explorations will be completed at this
time unless agreed upon otherwise.
The City will lead or assist with contacting potential landowner(s) and obtaining authorizations to access
the sites for completing the well reconnaissance surveys.
The deliverable for this task will be a brief technical memorandum and presentation summarizing
findings, options, and recommended next steps. We have assumed two weeks for the City to review and
comment on the draft technical memorandum.
GSI will submit a digital (Adobe Acrobat .pdf) version of the technical memorandum.
One, one-hour virtual conference call to discuss findings of the technical memorandum.
One, one-hour virtual presentation.
A budget amendment will be required to conduct additional work activities should any of the wells be
available for further examination or testing.
Should the wells not be available for further evaluation and/or testing, the work proposed under
subsequent Tasks 3 and 4 will be reassessed and a subsequent amendment to the Ecology-City
Agreement may be needed depending on agreed-upon next steps.
Task 3 – Water Quality Evaluation
The objective of this task is to conduct a water quality evaluation to assess whether the State’s groundwater
quality standards can be met, with the purpose of identifying water treatment and infrastructure alternatives
potentially available to reduce environmental risks of a future Pasco ASR program.
If findings from Task 2 are favorable and Ecology authorizes the work to continue, the specific work activities to
be completed as part of this task will include:
Plan for and lead one water quality evaluation planning meeting with Ecology staff.
Develop a work plan and QAPP for water quality sampling and analyses.
Coordinate with and incorporate input from Ecology on preparation of the work plan and QAPP.
Page 435 of 465
AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY FEASIBILITY STUDY, CITY PROJECT#: 20253,
GSI Water Solutions, Inc. 4
Develop a project-specific health and safety plan for field activities.
Plan for and coordinate all water quality sampling events with the City and analytical laboratory.
Monitor field parameters and collect water quality samples according to Ecology-approved work plan and
QAPP.
Tabulate and summarize water quality laboratory test results and compare against drinking water and
groundwater quality standards (Chapters 246-290-310 and 173-200-040 WAC).
Compare source water quality results against native groundwater quality data from the deep basalt wells,
and mineralogical and whole-rock composition data of the aquifer solids from the City of Kennewick ASR-
1 feasibility study
Complete a preliminary geochemical compatibility assessment to evaluate the effect of potential
geochemical reactions resulting from ASR activities on well performance and on the quality of the native
groundwater and source water recovered from storage.
Conduct a preliminary AKART 1 analysis and prepare a draft overriding consideration of the public interest
(OCPI) determination request to evaluate the best approach to reduce or eliminate constituents that
might violate the anti-degradation policy and to evaluate other strategies or approaches for meeting
water quality criteria and the State’s anti-degradation policy. The AKART analysis and OCPI determination
will be conducted according to Ecology’s Guidance for Aquifer Storage and Recovery AKART Analysis and
Overriding Consideration of the Public Interest Demonstration (Publication No. 17-10-035).
Deliverables and Milestone Activities
The primary deliverables and milestone activities for Task 3 are:
Work Plan and QAPP.
Technical memoranda summarizing findings from the water quality evaluation, preliminary AKART
analysis, and OCPI determination request.
Presentation to Ecology.
Meeting notes from presentation.
Task Lead and Team Member Roles
Cheryl Ross/WSP and Paul Cross/RH2 will co-lead Task 3. WSP will complete the geochemical compatibility
assessment and associated technical memorandum. RH2 will conduct the preliminary AKART analysis, OCPI
determination request, and prepare a draft technical memorandum summarizing the results. Other key personnel
and their work activities include:
Derek Holom/WSP (work plan, QAPP, coordinate water quality sampling events, water quality
characterization)
Ryan Withers/RH2 (AKART analysis, treatment options, and costing)
Kenny Janssen/GSI (task management, team coordination, review of work plans and draft technical
memorandums)
Walt Burt/GSI (review and quality assurance/quality control)
Fee Estimate and Assumptions
The estimated fee for this task is $220,059, and is based on the following assumptions:
Up to two document revisions will be needed for Ecology authorization of the final work plan and QAPP.
City staff will provide as-needed support during the water quality sampling events.
1 All known, available, and reasonable methods of prevention, control, and treatment
Page 436 of 465
AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY FEASIBILITY STUDY, CITY PROJECT#: 20253,
GSI Water Solutions, Inc. 5
The AKART analysis and OCPI determination will be conducted according to Ecology’s Guidance for
Aquifer Storage and Recovery AKART Analysis and Overriding Consideration of the Public Interest
Demonstration (Publication No. 17-10-035).
The treatment evaluation will be based on treatment methods/technologies that will be identified as
practical and cost effective for the City's ASR project.
The treatment evaluation will focus on wellhead treatment system(s) options rather than changes to the
City's water treatment plant operations.
The deliverables for this task will be a work plan, QAPP, brief technical memorandums and presentation
summarizing findings and recommended next steps. We have assumed four weeks for the City to review
and comment on the work plans and draft technical memorandums.
GSI will submit digital (Adobe Acrobat .pdf) versions of the work plan, QAPP, and technical
memorandums.
Meetings will be virtual and conducted remotely.
One, two-hour virtual conference call to discuss findings from this task.
One, one-hour virtual presentation.
Task 4 – Phase II Pasco ASR Feasibility Study Report
Pending Ecology approval and authorization to move forward based on findings and recommendations from the
preceding tasks, the purpose of this task will be to prepare a Phase II ASR Feasibility Study Report that will
update the Initial ASR Feasibility Study Report based on results of Tasks 2 and 3. If there are feasible/viable
options that the City in consultation with Ecology/OCR wants to pursue, then the Phase II report will include a
project implementation plan. The project implementation plan will describe additional investigations and analysis
needed to move development of a Pasco ASR program forward. The Phase II ASR report also will include a
planning-level implementation path and associated cost estimate for the City to follow in developing one or more
future ASR options.
The Phase II ASR report will summarize findings from Tasks 2 and 3, and will include:
Updated findings from the Initial ASR Feasibility Study Report describing hydrogeologic, water quality
and/or source water supply factors to consider in ASR.
The planning-level implementation path described in the Phase II ASR Feasibility Study Report will summarize, for
the highest ranked ASR site development option:
Additional data and/or analysis needs and recommendations.
Permitting pathway.
Project development plan and planning-level cost estimate.
A general project schedule, focusing on biennial time steps.
Planning level cost estimate(s) for preferred option.
An Ecology/OCR grant funding request if the City decides to proceed.
Deliverables and Milestone Activities
The primary deliverables and milestone activities for Task 4 are:
Draft report and planning-level implementation plan.
Presentation to Ecology.
Meeting notes from presentation.
Final report and planning-level implementation plan.
Page 437 of 465
AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY FEASIBILITY STUDY, CITY PROJECT#: 20253,
GSI Water Solutions, Inc. 6
Fee Estimate and Assumptions
The estimated fee for this task is $73,805, and is based on the following assumptions:
Meetings will be virtual and conducted remotely.
One, two-hour virtual conference call to discuss findings from this task.
One, one-hour virtual presentation.
Only a single document review cycle will be necessary for the report and one for the implementation plan.
GSI will incorporate City and Ecology review comments, and GSI will finalize, publish, and distribute final
versions to the City and Ecology.
GSI will submit digital (Adobe Acrobat .pdf) versions of the report and implementation plan.
Fee Estimate
GSI will complete this scope of work on a time and materials basis for the estimated amount of $348,967.00.
The fee estimate associated with this scope of work is presented in Table 1 and includes consulting team labor
and expenses and a 10 percent markup on outside services. This fee estimate will not be exceeded without prior
authorization from the City.
Table 1 – Fee Estimate
Task Description GSI Labor
Hours
GSI Labor
Cost
Outside
Services
Direct
Expenses Total
1 Project Administration * * * * RESERVED FOR CITY * * * *
2 Basalt Well Reconnaissance Surveys 119 $19,946 $34,485 $672 $55,103
3 Water Quality Evaluation 304 $50,820 $166,929 $2,310 $220,059
4 Phase II Pasco ASR Feasibility Study
Report 127 $23,108 $50,384 $313 $73,805
Estimated Totals 550 $93,874 $251,798 $3,295 $348,967
Schedule
We are prepared to begin working on this project immediately upon receipt of written authorization to proceed.
Closing
Thank you for this opportunity to continue supporting the City with evaluating potential ASR development options.
We are looking forward to getting started on this next phase of the project and working with the City and Ecology
along the way.
Sincerely,
GSI Water Solutions, Inc.
Kenny Janssen, LG Walter Burt, LHG
Principal Hydrogeologist Principal Hydrogeologist
Page 438 of 465
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 19, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 10/2/23
FROM: Steve Worley, Public Works Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4376 - Approval of Department of Ecology State Revolving
Fund (SRF) Pre-Construction Funding Application for Rivershore Sewer
Interceptor Upsizing Phase 1 Project
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4376, authorizing the submittal of
the Department of Ecology Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan Application
for the Rivershore Sewer Interceptor Upsizing, Phase 1 project for an amount of
up to $1,300,000.00.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Overall project costs during the pre-construction phase is currently estimated to
be $1.3 million dollars. City staff seeks permission to pursue funding for the full
estimated pre-construction cost in the form of a low-interest 1.2% rate, 20-year
loan term from the Department of Ecology Clean Water State Revolving Fund
(CWSRF).
Page 439 of 465
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City of Pasco (City) is growing rapidly and its wastewater system demands
are growing exponentially due to limited capacity, aging infrastructure and a
single wastewater treatment facility. The wastewater treatment plant can
accommodate current and short-term peak demands, but improvements must
be made to the City's wastewater gravity main and interceptor pipes by
increasing their pipe diameters to increase wastewater capacity.
In January 2022, Washington State Department of Ecology approved the latest
Comprehensive Sewer Plan Addendum. The Comprehensive Sewer Plan (CSP)
and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) included this project as a recomm ended
improvement and is identified as CSP#17, 20, and 21.
This project is currently at conceptual design stage. CWSRF program makes
funds available to municipalities to pay for infrastructure improvements to their
wastewater and stormwater treatment systems. This program is funded through
federal and state money and subject to state laws and additional federal
regulations. Applications are due by October 12, 2023.
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends Council approval for submittal of low-interest loan CWSRF
Application to the Department of Ecology for the Rivershore Sewer Interceptor
Upsizing, Phase 1 project. Council action, which can be in form of minutes from
the meeting, will show the Council's support of this funding pursuit and increase
the likelihood that the City receives CWSRF funding.
Page 440 of 465
Resolution - Rivershore Sewer Upsizing, PH 1 - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND (CWSRF) LOAN
APPLICATION FOR THE RIVERSHORE SEWER INTERCEPTOR UPSIZING,
PHASE 1 PROJECT FOR AN AMOUNT OF UP TO $1,300,000.00.
WHEREAS, the Rivershore Sewer Interceptor Upsizing, Phase 1 project will increase
wastewater capacity in the City of Pasco’s (City) largest sewer interceptors leading to the
wastewater treatment plant; and
WHEREAS, the City is growing and needs additional wastewater capacity to serve its
customers based on recommendations from the 2021 Comprehensive Sewer Plan; and
WHEREAS, Phase 1 currently at conceptual design stage and is recommended in the 2021
Comprehensive Sewer Plan and Capital Improvement Plan and is identified as CSP#17, 20, and
21; and
WHEREAS, the funding strategy for this project involves pursuing a preconstruction
CWSRF low-interest loan through Washington State Department of Ecology’s Financial
Assistance Program; and
WHEREAS, an application is prepared for an amount of up to $1,300,000 to cover design
and permitting activities for the project; and
WHEREAS, as currently advertised, CWSRF 20-year Design Loans have a 1.2% interest
rate; and
WHEREAS, if the City is selected as a recipient for the CWSRF 20-year loan, the loan
agreement will be subject to City Council review and approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council authorizes the submittal of the low-interest loan CWSRF application
to the Department of Ecology for the Rivershore Sewer Interceptor Upsizing, Phase 1 project; and
further authorizes the City Manager to execute the loan documents.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution will take effect immediately.
Page 441 of 465
Resolution - Rivershore Sewer Upsizing, PH 1 - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2023.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 442 of 465
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 10/2/23
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Deputy City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4377 - Interlocal Agreement with Port of Pasco for
Promotion of Economic Development
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
Interlocal Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4377, authorizing the City Manager
to sign and execute an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Pasco and Port
of Pasco for Promotion of Economic Development in Pasco.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Economic Development Fund - $90,000
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Ports and Cities have the authority to engage in economic development and the
Port of Pasco and the City of Pasco have a strong history of working together in
successful economic development projects. The Port's mission is to develop the
economy of its district (includes the City) in a manner that creates sustainable
jobs and a healthy tax base and the Port has dedicated staff to promote that
mission. Both the Port and the City share similar economic development goals
and are pursuing similar activities to promote economic development.
V. DISCUSSION:
Port of Pasco and City of Pasco share common economic development goals
and hence have worked closely together to increase the economic base of the
community. Port of Pasco has dedicated staff with a proven t rack record of
promoting the community. Collaborating with Port for economic development
Page 443 of 465
can bring several advantages. It streamlines the process for businesses
interested in investing in the community with the alignment of resources between
the two entities. Additionally, it leads to a more efficient allocation of public
resources, ensuring that economic development is cost -effective and beneficial
for the City and the Port.
Staff recommends approval of this action.
Page 444 of 465
Resolution - Port of Pasco – Promotion of Economic Development ILA - 2
RESOLUTION NO. ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND EXECUTE AN
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PASCO AND THE
PORT OF PASCO FOR PROMOTION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN
PASCO.
WHEREAS, RCW 39.34, INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT, authorizes political
subdivisions to jointly exercise their powers, privileges, or authorities with other political
subdivisions of this State through the execution of an interlocal cooperative or interagency
agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) has authority to engage in economic development
per RCW 35.21.703; and
WHEREAS, the City’s current budget has an approved funding amount of $90,000 to
engage in economic development; and
WHEREAS, the Port of Pasco (Port) has authority to engage in economic development
per RCW 53.08.245; and
WHEREAS, the Port’s mission is to develop the economy of the Port District in a manner
that creates sustainable jobs and a healthy tax base, and the Port has dedicated staff to promote that
mission; and
WHEREAS, both the Port and the City share similar economic development goals and are
pursuing similar activities to promote economic development; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Port desire to achieve these goals and objectives by
leveraging resources and staff to maximize the results of economic development efforts and
maximize value to residents; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due
consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into the
Interlocal Agreement to promote economic development of Pasco with the Port of Pasco.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of
the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Pasco and the Port of Pasco; a copy of which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A.
Page 445 of 465
Resolution - Port of Pasco – Promotion of Economic Development ILA - 2
Section 2. The City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby authorized,
empowered, and directed to sign and execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Pas co; and
to make minor, substantive changes as necessary to execute the Agreement
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
2023.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 446 of 465
St
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
the City of Pasco and the Port of Pasco
for
the Promotion of Economic Development in Pasco
This INTERLOCALCOOPERATIVEAGREEMENT(“Agreement”)is entered into pursuant to
RCW 39.34,as of this day of 2023,by the City of Pasco,a municipal
corporation of the State of Washington,hereinafter the “City”,and Port of Pasco,a public
body corporate of the State of Washington,hereinafter “Port”,collectively referred to in this
Agreement hereafter as the “Parties”.
WHEREAS;The City has authority to engage in economic development per RCW 35.21.703;
and
WHEREAS;the City 2023 Budget has an approved funding amount of $90,000 to engage in
economic development;and
WHEREAS;The Port has authority to engage in economic development per RCW 53.08.245;
and
WHEREAS;The Port's mission is to develop the economy of the Port District in a manner
that creates sustainable jobs and a healthy tax base and the Port has dedicated staff to
promote that mission;and
WHEREAS;Both the Port and the City share similar economic development goals and are
pursuing similar activities to promote economic development;and
WHEREAS;The City and the Port desire to better achieve these goals and objectives by
leveraging resources and staff to maximize the results of economic development efforts and
maximize value to residents;
NOW THEREFORE;The City and Port agree to the following:
1.The City may request the assistance of Port staff with the following economic
development tasks on an “as needed”basis:
a.Economic Development Strategic Planning
b.Implementation:Targeted Urban Area Tax Exemption (RCW 84.25)
between
Page 447 of 465
a‘
c.Business Retention &Expansion-Industrial
cl.Business Retention &Expansion —Retail/Commercial/
Hospitality
e.Business Recruitment &Attraction
Retail/Hospitality Recruitment &Attraction
.Small Business/Entrepreneurship Assistance —Coordinate local,regional,state
service providers and lenders.
.Workforce Development:Local/Regional coordination
.The City agrees to reimburse the Port at an hourly ?at rate of $125.00 for this staff
assistance.This rate includes all associated staff costs including bene?ts and
overhead.The Port shall invoice the City on a monthly basis.
.Costs for materials,professional assistance outside that of Port staff and speci?c
travel costs (pre-approved)will be the responsibility of the City.
.Work performed per this Interlocal Agreement shall be approved by the City
Manager
.Either the City or the Port may terminate this Interlocal Agreement with 30 days
notice to other party.Notice to the City shall be directed to the Pasco City Manager
and notice to the Port shall be directed to the Port Executive Director.In the event
the Interlocal Agreement is terminated,neither the City nor the Port will pursue an
action to recover costs incurred by either party,with exception that costs necessary
for services approved by the City and incurred by the Port prior to the termination
will be reimbursed per the terms of this Interlocal Agreement.
.Term of Agreement and Termination.This Agreement is effective upon the
signature of all Parties and terminates on June 30,20248.
.The records and documents associated with all matters covered by this Agreement
shall be jointly owned by the City and the Port and all non—privilegedrecords and
documents shall be subject to inspection by any Party during the term of this
Agreement.
.No Separate Legal Entity.No new,separate administrative or legal entity is to be
established in association with this Agreement nor to conduct the cooperative
undertaking described herein.The Community and Economic Development Director
Page 448 of 465
PORT OF PASCO CITYOF PASCO
By:Ran Hay en By:Adam Lincoln
Its:Executive Director Its:City Manager
Date:Date:
AS TO FORM:APPROVEDAS TO FORM
of the City and the Director of Economic Development of the Port shall be joint
administrators of this cooperative undertaking.
9.Severability.In the event that any term or condition of this Agreement or
application thereof to any person,entity,or circumstance is held invalid;such
invalidity shall not affect any other terms,conditions,or applications of this
Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid term,condition,or
application.To this end,the terms and conditions of this Agreement are declared
severable.
10.Recording.This Agreement shall be ?led with the Franklin County Auditor or posted
on each Parties web site.
In Witness Whereof,the Darties have signed this Agreement as of the day and year
written below.
I3 Z3
Page 449 of 465
Page Scope of Work City/Port ILA 09072023
Scope of Work
2023/2024ILA—City of Pasco Economic Development
City of Pasco Economic Strategic Plan
Assistance with consultant selection for an Economic Development Plan.
Resource for Consultants (ongoing)
Plan implementation —assist as determined by outcomes/objectives
Supplemental/supporting information —unmet needs by job classi?cation;?scal bene?t by type
—commercial,retail,and industrial (job totals,property tax annual revenue by type,sales tax
revenue by type,one time construction sales tax by type).
Targeted Urban Area Tax Exemption RCW 84.25
Work with City staff to explore this potential property tax incentive
0 Secure sample document package
0 Assist in determining tax area boundary
0 Prepare draft documents
0 Prepare recruitment marketing approach
I Utilize tax exemption as recruitment incentive for private investment/job
creation
Community Economic Development/Professional Development (ongoing)
Colima Pasco Cooperation Assoc.=board member,co—chairEcon.Dvlp.&Trade Comm.
WA Economic Development Assoc.=board member,Legislative Comm.
International Economic Dvlp.Council =industry assoc.resource,professional certi?cation
Downtown Pasco Dvlp.Assoc.=board liaison on behalf of Port
I Future support of DPDA staff on economic development activities:
0 Assist with Adaptive Reuse/Redevelopment &Reuse
0 Assist with PDA economic development functions
0 Strategic implementation of consultant's recommendations
City/County Land inventory =Marketable ground for development by zoning classi?cation:
Example:Parcel #=Location +Lot Size +Zoning +Owner (City/County/Port),etc.
Workforce Development
Columbia Basin College Workforce Task Force (active member):path to job training grants,new
certi?cates in support of Aerospace,Food Processing,Advanced Manufacturing,etc.
WSU Tri-Cities School of Business —short term certi?cate program (market)
Benton Franklin Workforce Development Council
Resource to companies seeking on-the-job training (BRE)
Page 450 of 465
Page Scope of Work City/Port ILA 09072023
Small Business Assistance (startups,entrepreneurs)
0 Create Resource Guide —One—stop-shopdirectory (utilize partners)
0 Convene regional roundtable —business service providers (TRIDEC,Chambers,SBDC,etc.)
0 Marketing and promotion of services
Business Retention —Retai|/Commercial]Hospitality
0 Create outreach model by region/zone =Downtown,Court St.,Road 68,Broadmoor (future)
0 One-on-one assessment’s (smallest sample)-potential subcontractor,chamber,etc.
0 Utilize Business Survey model for (larger sample)—potential subcontractor
0 Establish action items based on business feedback (utilize partners)
0 NOTE:signi?cant initial time commitment
Business Retention —Industrial
-Develop company inventory
0 4 to 6 Annual one—on—one meetings (targeted surveys,individual/cumulativereport)
0 Establish action items based on business feedback (utilize partners)
0 Jointly with TRIDEC
Small Business Attraction &Recruitment
0 Develop/Create Manufacturers’or Inventors’Makerspace (industrial makers)
0 Different from a co—workingspace
0 NOTE:Ag Innovation Center considering similar concept
0 Develop Small Business Industrial Center (micro lots .5,1,1.5-acre sites)low barriers
o Emphasis on Minority Owned,Women Owned,Veteran Owned
0 Tri-Cities Airport Business Center -Commercial,professional,retail businesses.
Retail/Hospitality Business Attraction &Recruitment
0 ICSC—International Council of Shopping Centers
Annual,May event —Las Vegas
Broadmoor development —coordinate with city,landowner,realtor
Marketing Tri-Cities Airport Business Center (Hotel,restaurant focus)
Marketing City-owned sites (Gesa Stadium pads)
0 Marketing Franklin County-owned sites (HAPO Center pads)
0 Broadmoor Development
0 City Support for overall development process
OOOO
Page 451 of 465
n
n
w 1 :
nu
.n
n ..'
v.,1
H
4
H‘
n .'
n
n
Page Scope of Work City/Port ILA 09072023
Industrial/CommercialBusiness Attraction &Recruitment
0 World Ag Expo (international ag trade show)
0 Annual,February event —Tulare,CA
0 Direct engagement with emerging companies in agriculture:automation,robotics,
arti?cial intelligence,autonomous vehicles,manufacturing,distribution,and green
energy.
0 Shared booth with Eastern Washington Economic Development Alliance.
0 Se|ectUSA Investment Summit (Hosted by U.S.Government,foreign direct investment)
0 Annual May event —Maryland.
0 Direct engagement with foreign companies looking to expand operations to the United
States/PNW.
0 Utilize lead generation services for con?rmed company meetings.
0 Direct engagement with additional companies via booth interaction.
0 Shared booth with Washington State Department of Commerce.
0 National Business Aviation Association Conv.October 2023
0 AIM Center Recruitment
0 NAIOP CRE Converge —Oct.2023 —EWEDA booth
o National Commercial Real Estate Expo in Seattle
0 Promotion of Retail/Commercial/Industrialtonational ?rms
-Paci?c Northwest Aerospace Alliance February 2024
0 AIM Center Recruitment
0 NAIOP |.Con West —March 2024
0 Industrial Expo designed for development &expansion of industrial real estate
0 Site Selectors Guild April 2024
0 Annual conference nation's top site selection ?rms
0 Features guaranteed one—on—one engagement
0 Food Northwest Process 8:Packaging Expo
o PNW‘slargest food processing expo
0 Green Energy:TBD —Chip and wafer manufacturing,battery manufacturing,SMR
Page 452 of 465
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 29, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Regular
Meeting: 10/2/23
FROM: Jacob Gonzalez, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: *Resolution No. 4378 - Setting a Public Hearing Date to consider a Right-
of-Way Vacation at Road 76 & Chapel Hill Boulevard (VAC 2023 -002)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Time and Date Resolution
Exhibit "A" Road Easement Vacation
Site Map
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4378, setting 7:00 p.m., Monday,
October 23rd, 2023, as the time and date for a public hearing to consider the
Right-of-Way Vacation at Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard, in Pasco,
Washington.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City of Pasco’s Transportation Improvement Plan adopted via Resolution
No 4356 on June 20, 2023, identified the need to construct an overpass at Road
76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard in order to alleviate conge stion on Road 68 and
accommodate future growth.
The City of Pasco has grown dramatically over the last 15 years. This growth
has included both new residential developments, particularly north of the I -182
freeway, and new commercial corridors, particularly along Road 68.
As the City continues to grow, the I-182 freeway has become a significant
transportation barrier. Current I-182 crossing opportunities in the western portion
of Pasco are limited to interchanges, forcing local trips to mingle with regional
Page 453 of 465
traffic. This gap in infrastructure creates increased congestion on the Road 68
and Road 100 corridors, in addition to corridor and intersection safety issues.
The Road 68 and Road 100 interchanges provide minimal pedestrian and bicycle
facilities. This gap effectively cuts off the neighborhoods north of I -182 from
residences, schools, and recreational opportunities south of the freeway, with
nearly 7 miles of I-182 separating usable bicycle and pedestrian crossings.
In 2022, the City contracted with DKS Associates to conduct and prepare a
feasibility study for the upcoming Road 76 overpass project. Part of this
feasibility study included a careful examination of the Right-of-Way that would
be required to construct this project. Subsequent to this study being produced,
the City began coordinating with adjacent property owners regarding the desired
change to the right-of-way.
V. DISCUSSION:
The property to the South/East of the new overpass is owned by Ron Asmus.
Mr. Asmus is willing to dedicate 0.46 acres of Right -of-Way to the City in
exchange for an easement vacation of 0.35 acres consistent with the feasibility
study performed by the City to help facilitate the future Road 76 overpass project.
Staff has evaluated this proposition, and recommends that it is in the best
interest of the City to move forward with the proposed vacation. Staff
recommends that council pass a resolution establishing a hearing date for the
proposed vacation on October 23rd, 2023.
Page 454 of 465
Resolution - Setting PH for VAC 2023-002 - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, SETTING 7:00 PM, MONDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2023, AS THE
TIME AND DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RIGHT-OF-
WAY VACATION AT ROAD 76 AND CHAPEL HILL BOULEVARD, IN
PASCO, WASHINGTON.
WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the
general interest of the City of Pasco, the City Council may vacate rights-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the City staff is requesting that the City Council initiate the vacation
procedures at Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard in Pasco; and
WHEREAS, the vacation process, provided in the PMC Chapter 12.40 requires a survey,
title report, an appraisal of value, and compensation unless waived by City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City staff is requesting that Council make a determination concerning
whether to waive the requirements of a title report, appraisal of value, and compensation pursuant
to PMC 12.40.120(2) after holding a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City may waive the requirements for a survey pursuant to PMC Section
12.40.110 if the location and legal description of the street or alley proposed for vacation is
sufficiently known to the City such that an accurate legal description can be determined with
certainty without a survey; and
WHEREAS, as part of Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard, the Right-of-Way located in
Pasco is sufficiently known to the City such that a legal description is capable of being produced
without the need for a survey; and
WHEREAS, PMC Section 12.40.040 requires public hearings on vacations to be fixed by
Resolution, and to provide notice for such hearing which shall occur no later than 60 days after,
nor earlier than 20 days after, the passage of this Resolution setting a public hearing.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
Section 1. Initiation of Vacation by Council. That pursuant to PMC Chapter 12.40, the
City Council hereby initiates the vacation procedures.
Section 2. Notice of Hearing. That a public hearing to consider vacating the following as
depicted in the attached Exhibit A, will be held before City Council of the City of Pasco in the
Council Chambers at 525 N. Third Avenue, Pasco, Washington at the hour of 7:00 p.m., on the
23rd day of October 2023:
Page 455 of 465
Resolution - Setting PH for VAC 2023-002 - 2
RELINQUISHMENT OF THAT PORTION OF THE 40.00-FOOT-WIDE
RIGHT-OF-WAY AFFECTING LOT 1 AS DEPICTED ON THE RECORD
SURVEY RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 1847849, RECORDS
OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SITUATED IN SECTION 16,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W.M., FRANKLIN COUNTY,
WASHINGTON LYING NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE
SOUTH 66°56'15" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2738.64
FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT AND THE BEGINNING
OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS OF WHICH
BEARS SOUTH 74°38’17” EAST 490.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY
ALONG SAID CURVE AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 317.18
FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37°05’16” TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00°06’55” EAST 98.18 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF ABOVE SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE
POINT OF TERMINUS OF SAID LINE.
CONTAINING 15,166 S.F.
Section 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Pasco give notice of said public hearing as
required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this ___ day of _______
20__.
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 456 of 465
ProposedVacationPage 457 of 465
ProposedVacationPage 458 of 465
APN 117510033ASMUS, RONALD E &TRACEY LOUISEAPN 117500118DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCESAPN 117510039DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCESAPN 116150065WAL-MART REAL ESTATEBUSINESS TRUSTAPN 117500117DEPARTMENTOF NATURALRESOURCESRoad 76I-18
2
W
e
s
t Chapel Hill BlvdChapel Hill Blvd
I-18
2
E
a
s
tPROPOSED TOTALROW AREA = 3.10 ACPROPOSED TOTALROW AREA = 2.87 AC301'111'UTILITY EASEMENT AFN 1642997APN 117500115DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCESUTILITY EASEMENTAFN 1607057PROPOSED R/W ACQUISITION(117510033) = 0.46 AC110'PROPOSED ACCESSEASEMENT ACQUISITION(117510039) = 0.87 ACAPN 117530015DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCESPROPOSED ACCESSEASEMENT ACQUISITION(117500118) = 0.07 ACPROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENTACQUISITION (117530015) =2.80 AC301'111'110'PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINEADJUSTMENT FROM 117500115TO 117530018 = 1.86 ACDEDICATED CITY ROADEASEMENT AFN 1896650APN 116121114ISLAND ESTATES ROWHOMES ASSOCIATIONPROPOSED CITY ROADEASEMENT AFN1847849 = 1.17 ACPROPOSED CITY ROADEASEMENT AFN1847849 = 1.18 AC130'80'40'40'PROPOSED ACCESSEASEMENT TRANSFER TO117510033 = 0.21 ACCITY ROAD EASEMENTRELINQUISHMENT AFN1847849 = 0.35 ACDESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:"L"HORIZ. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:NOTE:IF "L" DOES NOT MEASURE 1"ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLYCITY OF PASCOSHEET NO:LBS1/12/2023FG1" = 250'N/AROAD 76 OVERPASSEXHIBIT COVERSHEET1/5OWNERSHIPSPARCELNO.NAMETOTALAREA*R/WREMAINDERACCESSEASEMENTCITY ROADEASEMENTCOLOR117510033ASMUS, RONALD E & TRACEY LOUISE33.390.4632.93***01.18117510039DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES59.50059.501.08***1.17117500118DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES11.70013.56**0.070117530015DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES20.03018.17**2.800* TOTAL AREA PER FRANKLIN COUNTY ASSESSOR** BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT = 1.86AC*** ACCESS EASEMENT TRANSFER TO 117510033 = 0.21ACALL AREAS LISTED IN ACRESLEGENDPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYEXISTING EASEMENTPROPERTY LINESPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY LINEROAD CENTERLINEACCESS EASEMENT TRANSFERBOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENTCITY ROAD EASEMENTRELINQUISHMENTPROPOSED CITY ROADEASEMENTFeet0250500Page 459 of 465
Chapel Hill BlvdAPN 117510033ASMUS, RONALD E& TRACEY LOUISEAPN 117510039DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCESE I 182 To Road 68 RampRoad 68 Chapel Hill BlvdI-182 EastAPN 117500118DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCESAPN 117530015DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCES40'PROPOSED R/WACQUISITION(117510033) = 0.46 ACCITY ROAD EASEMENTRELINQUISHMENTAFN 1847849 = 0.35ACPROPOSED ACCESSEASEMENT TRANSFER TO117510033 = 0.21 ACPROPOSED CITY ROADEASEMENT AFN1847849 = 1.18 ACDESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:"L"HORIZ. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:NOTE:IF "L" DOES NOT MEASURE 1"ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLYCITY OF PASCOSHEET NO:LBS1/12/2023FG1"= 400'N/AROAD 76 OVERPASSASMUS 1175100332/5Feet0250500OWNERSHIPSPARCELNO.NAMETOTALAREA*R/WREMAINDERACCESSEASEMENTCITY ROADEASEMENTCOLOR117510033ASMUS, RONALD E & TRACEY LOUISE33.390.4632.93***01.18* TOTAL AREA PER FRANKLIN COUNTY ASSESSOR*** ACCESS EASEMENT TRANSFER TO 117510033 = 0.20ACALL AREAS LISTED IN ACRESPage 460 of 465
Chapel Hill BlvdAPN 117510033ASMUS, RONALD E& TRACEY LOUISEAPN 117510039DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCESE I 182 To Road 68 RampRoad 68 Chapel Hill BlvdPROPOSED ACCESSEASEMENT ACQUISITION(117510039) = 0.87 ACPROPOSED CITYROAD EASEMENT AFN1847849= 1.17 AC166'40'PROPOSED ACCESSEASEMENT TRANSFER TO117510033 = 0.21 ACDESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:"L"HORIZ. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:NOTE:IF "L" DOES NOT MEASURE 1"ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLYCITY OF PASCOSHEET NO:LBS1/12/2023FG1"= 400'N/AROAD 76 OVERPASSDNR 1175100393/5DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:CITY OF PASCOSHEET NO:Feet0250500OWNERSHIPSPARCELNO.NAMETOTALAREA*R/WREMAINDERACCESSEASEMENTCITY ROADEASEMENTCOLOR117510039DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES59.50059.501.08***1.17* TOTAL AREA PER FRANKLIN COUNTY ASSESSOR*** ACCESS EASEMENT TRANSFER TO 117510033 = 0.21ACALL AREAS LISTED IN ACRESPage 461 of 465
Burden Blvd
Road 76APN 117500118DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCES110'PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENTACQUISITION (117500118) =0.07 ACPROPOSED BOUNDARY LINEADJUSTMENT FROM 117500115TO 117530018 = 1.86 ACDESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:"L"HORIZ. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:NOTE:IF "L" DOES NOT MEASURE 1"ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLYCITY OF PASCOSHEET NO:LBS1/12/2023FG1" = 120'N/AROAD 76 OVERPASSDNR 1175001184/5OWNERSHIPSPARCELNO.NAMETOTALAREA*R/WREMAINDERACCESSEASEMENTCITY ROADEASEMENTCOLOR117500118DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES11.70013.56**0.070* TOTAL AREA PER FRANKLIN COUNTY ASSESSOR** BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT = 1.86AC*** ACCESS EASEMENT TRANSFER TO 117510033 = 0.21ACALL AREAS LISTED IN ACRESFeet0120240Page 462 of 465
Chapel Hill BlvdRoad 76EASEMENTEASEMENTEASEMENTChapel Hill BlvdI-182 EastAPN 117500118DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCES40404040APN 117510033ASMUS, RONALD E &TRACEY LOUISEAPN 117510039DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCESAPN 117530015DEPARTMENT OFNATURAL RESOURCES301'PROPOSED ACCESSEASEMENT ACQUISITION(117530015) = 2.80 AC111'PROPOSED TOTALROW AREA = 2.87 ACPROPOSED BOUNDARY LINEADJUSTMENT FROM 117500115TO 117530018 = 1.86 ACDESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:"L"HORIZ. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:NOTE:IF "L" DOES NOT MEASURE 1"ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLYCITY OF PASCOSHEET NO:LBS1/12/2023FG1" = 500'N/AROAD 76 OVERPASSDNR 1175300155/5Feet0200400OWNERSHIPSPARCELNO.NAMETOTALAREA*R/WREMAINDERACCESSEASEMENTCITY ROADEASEMENTCOLOR117530015DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES20.03018.17**2.800* TOTAL AREA PER FRANKLIN COUNTY ASSESSOR** BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT = 1.86ACALL AREAS LISTED IN ACRESPage 463 of 465
QUALITY OF LIFE
Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re-
investment in community infrastructure including, but not limited to:
• Completion of Transportation System Master Plan and design standard updates to promote greater
neighborhood cohesion in new and re-developed neighborhoods through design elements, e.g.;
connectivity, walkability, aesthetics, sustainability, and community gathering spaces.
• Completion of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan and development of an implementation
strategy to enhance such services equitably across the community. • Completion of the Housing Action and Implementation Plan with a focus on a variety of housing to address
the needs of the growing population.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services and programs, including, but not
limited to:
• Adopting policies and strategic investment standards to assure consistency of long-range planning to include
update of impact fees, area fees to specific infrastructure, and SEPA mitigation measures related to new
development, e.g.; schools, traffic, parks, and fire.
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system including, but not limited to:
• Application of the adopted Transportation System Master Plan including development of policies, regulations,
programs, and projects that provide for greater connectivity, strategic investment, mobility, multi -modal
systems, accessibility, efficiency, and safety.
COMMUNITY SAFETY
Promote proactive approaches for the strategic investment of infrastructure, staffing, and equipment
including, but not limited to:
• Adoption and develop implementation strategies for Comprehensive Fire Master Plan aimed at maintaining the
current Washington State Rating Bureau Class 3 community rating.
• Collaboration with regional partners to influence strategies to reduce incidences of homeless by leveraging
existing resources such as the newly implemented 0.1% mental health sales tax, use of resource navigator
programs, and other efforts. • Development of an implementation strategy for the Comprehensive Police Master Plan to support future service
levels of the department to assure sustainability, public safety, officer safety, crime control, and compliance
with legislative mandates.
ECONOMIC VITALITY
Promote and encourage economic vitality including, but not limited to:
• Implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan through related actions including zoning code changes,
phased sign code update, and development regulations and standards.
• Completion of Area Master Plans and environmental analysis complementing the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan such as Downtown and Broadmoor Master Plans.
• Development of an Economic Development Plan, including revitalization efforts.
COMMUNITY IDENTITY
Identify opportunities to enhance community identity, cohesion, and image including, but not limited to:
• Development of a Community Engagement Plan to evaluate strategies, technologies, and other opportunities
to further inclusivity, community engagement, and inter-agency and constituent coordination efforts.
• Support of the Arts and Culture Commission in promoting unity and the celebration of diversity through art
and culture programs, recognition of significant events or occurrences, and participation/sponsorship of events
within the community.
Page 464 of 465
CALIDAD DE VIDA
Promover una calidad de vida alta a través de programas de calidad, servicios, inversiones y reinversiones
apropiadas en la infraestructura de la comunidad incluyendo, pero no limitado a:
• Terminar el Plan de Transportación para promover más cohesión entre nuestras vecindades actuales y re-desarrolladas
a través de elementos de diseño, p.ej. conectividad, transitabilidad, sostenibilidad estética, y espacios para reuniones
comunitarias.
• Terminar el Plan de los Parques, la Recreación, y los Espacios Vacíos y el desarrollo de una estrategia de
implementación para mejorar tales servicios justamente a lo largo de la comunidad.
• Terminar el Plan de Acción e Implementación de Viviendas con un enfoque en una variedad de viviendas para tratar las
necesidades del aumento en la población.
SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA
Mejorar la viabilidad a largo plazo, el valor, y los niveles de los servicios y los programas, incluyendo, pero no
limitado a:
• Adoptar las políticas y los estándares de inversión estratégica para asegurar consistencia en la planificación a largo
plazo para incluir la actualización de las tarifas de impacto, las tarifas en áreas de infraestructura específica, y las
medidas de mitigación SEPA relacionadas con el nuevo desarrollo, p.ej. escuelas, tráfico, parques, e incendios.
RED DE TRANSPORTACION COMUNITARIA
Promover un sistema de transportación multimodal en alta operación incluyendo, pero no limitado a:
• Aplicar el Plan de Transportación que fue adoptado, incluyendo el desarrollo de las políticas, las reglas, los programas,
y los proyectos que proporcionan más conectividad, inversión estratégica, movilidad, sistemas multimodales,
accesibilidad, eficiencia, y seguridad.
SEGURIDAD COMUNITARIA
Promover métodos proactivos para la inversión estratégica en la infraestructura, el personal, y el equipo
incluyendo, pero no limitado a:
• Adoptar y desarrollar estrategias de implementación para el Plan Comprehensivo para Incendios. Con el propósito de
mantener la clasificación comunitaria actual en la tercera Clase del Departamento de Clasificación del Estado de
Washington.
• Colaborar con socios regionales para influenciar estrategias que reduzcan los incidentes de personas sin hogar al
hacer uso de los recursos actuales como el impuesto de ventas de 0.1% implementado recientemente para la salud
mental, el uso de programas para navegar los recursos, y otros esfuerzos.
• Desarrollar una estrategia de implementación para el Plan Comprehensivo de la Policía para apoyar los niveles futuros
de servicio del departamento para asegurar la sostenibilidad, la seguridad pública, la seguridad de los policías, el
control de crímenes, y el cumplimiento con los mandatos legislativos.
VITALIDAD ECONOMICA
Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica incluyendo, pero no limitado a:
• Implementar el Plan Comprehensivo del Uso de Terreno a través de acciones relacionadas, incluyendo cambios de los
códigos de zonificación, actualización en las etapas de los códigos de las señales, y el desarrollo de las reglas y los
estándares.
• Terminar los Planes de las Áreas y un análisis ambiental el cual complementa al plan integral de uso de la tierra como a
los Planes del Centro y de Broadmoor.
• Desarrollar un Plan de Desarrollo Económico, el cual incluya esfuerzos de revitalización.
IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA
Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la cohesión, y la imagen incluyendo, pero no
limitado a:
• Desarrollar un Plan de Participación de la Comunidad para evaluar las estrategias, las tecnologías, y otras
oportunidades para promover la inclusividad, la participación de la comunidad, y los esfuerzos interdepartamentales y de
coordinación de los constituyentes.
• Apoyar a la Comisión de las Artes y Cultura al promover la unidad y la celebración de la diversidad a través de
programas de arte y cultura, reconocer eventos o acontecimientos significantes, y participar/patrocinar eventos dentro
de la comunidad.
Page 465 of 465