Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023.08.14 Council Workshop Packet AGENDA City Council Workshop Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, August 14, 2023 Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & GoToWebinar Page 1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - The Pasco City Council Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco. To listen to the meeting via phone, call (415) 655-0060 and use access code 307-404-066. 2. CALL TO ORDER 3. ROLL CALL (a) Pledge of Allegiance 4. EXECUTIVE SESSION (a) Discussion with Legal Counsel About Current or Potential Litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) (15 minutes) 5. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS 6. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 3 - 13 (a) Discussion - Amending the Pasco Municipal Code Title 25 Related to Residential Design Standards 14 - 22 (b) Discussion - Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Housing - Moratorium 7. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION 8. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 24 9. ADDITIONAL NOTES 23 - 24 (a) Adopted 2020-2021 Council Goals (Reference Only) (b) REMINDERS • Tuesday, August 15, 4:00 PM: Pasco Public Facilities District Board Meeting – Council Chambers, Pasco City Hall (MAYOR PRO TEM CRAIG MALONEY, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE, Alt.) • Tuesday, August 15, 4:30 PM: Heritage University Grand Opening Celebration - 333 W. Canal Drive, Kennewick, WA 99336 (COUNCIL - RSVP'D) • Wednesday, August 16, 5:30 PM: Benton, Franklin & Walla Walla Counties Good Roads & Transportation Association Meeting – Clover Island Inn, Kennewick (COUNCILMEMBER JOSEPH CAMPOS, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER PETE SERRANO, Alt.) • Friday, August 18, 10:00 AM: Benton-Franklin Council of Governments Board Meeting – Ben-Franklin Transit, 1000 Columbia Park Trail, Richland (COUNCILMEMBER IRVING BROWN, Rep., COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE, Alt.) • Monday, August 21, 6:00 PM: LEOFF Disability Board – City Hall Conference Room 1, Pasco City Hall (MAYOR BLANCH BARAJAS, Rep.; MAYOR PRO TEM CRAIG MALONEY, Alt.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and stre amed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.) Page 2 of 24 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council August 9, 2023 TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 8/14/23 FROM: Jacob Gonzalez, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Discussion - Amending the Pasco Municipal Code Title 25 Related to Residential Design Standards I. REFERENCE(S): Staff Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: City staff are preparing a substantial update to the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) to accommodate a variety of residential housing options and typologies, increase development flexibility and clarity, and accommodate local market needs. Work on Phase 1 began in December 2021 and was initiated with the help of the Home Builders Association of the Tri-Cities (HBA-TC) and to supplement the upcoming Housing Action and Implementation Plan. The proposed recommendations are being conducted with the assistance of planning consultant, Oneza and Associates. This effort is intended to be the first phase of several that follow recent changes associated with Washington State House Bill 1923, adopted by the Council in January 2022. The purpose of this staff report is to highlight key revisions to the Zoning Code. Staff is prepared to follow this report with several workshops throughout the summer/fall. Proposed Recommendations Page 3 of 24 The changes will impact various elements of PMC Title 25: Zoning. Staff focused revisions on the following key features: This update will focus on the following components: • Lot Sizes and Dimensions • Lot Frontages • Setbacks • Building Orientation • Parking and Driveways • Site Access and Circulation These elements were selected after receiving a proposal from the Home Builders Association of the Tri-Cities. These elements were also indicated as barriers in the results of a 2021 Housing Survey conducted by staff which solicited feedback from housing developers, stakeholders, and builders. Planning Commission Summary The Pasco Planning Commission recommended the draft ordinance at the November 2022 meeting. The Planning Commission conducted three public hearings and four workshops to discuss the proposal. The table below summarizes meetings and public hearings held with the Planning Commission. In addition to the meetings above, this effort has been shared and communicated with various stakeholders in the housing development community. Staff held three (3) meetings to ensure that the proposed changes are practical in addressing much-needed housing flexibility. Staff notes that additional input has been provided by local builders and developers, which may require minor changes to the proposal. V. DISCUSSION: Staff welcomes City Council input and feedback on the proposal, which will help guide follow up discussions and workshops. A presentation has been prepared for Council. Page 4 of 24 CA2022-001 –Residential Design Standards Objectives Phase 1: Essential/critical modifications •Offer variety of housing choices •Promote variety in site and building design •Increase design standard simplicityPage 5 of 24 CA2022-001 –Residential Design Standards Objectives Phase 1: Essential/critical modifications Page 6 of 24 CA2022-001 –Residential Design Standards Minimum Lot Size Home Type Minimum Lot Size (SQFT) Per Unit R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 SFDU –Detached 7,200 / DU 5,000 / DU 3,000 / DU 2,000 / DU SFDU -Attached •Townhome/Rowhouse 3,600 / DU 3,000 / DU 2,000 / DU 1,500 / DU •Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex 3,600 / DU 2,500 / DU 2,000 / DU 1,500 / DU •Cottage House, Courtyard Housing (4-12 units)3,600 2,000 1,800 1,500 Multiplex/Apartments Dependent on Comprehensive Plan Density, Site Design and Parking Requirements.Page 7 of 24 CA2022-001 –Residential Design Standards Minimum Site Frontage & Width Home Type Minimum Site Frontage & Width (FT) R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 SFDU –Detached 60’/ DU 40’ / DU 40’ / DU 30’ / DU SFDU -Attached •Townhome/Rowhouse 35’ / DU 25’ / DU 20’ / DU 20’ / DU •Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex 60’ / Lot 40’ / Lot 40’ / Lot 30’ / Lot •Cottage House (Entire Lot)60’ / Lot 40’ / Lot 40’ / Lot 30’ / Lot Multiplex/Apartments, Courtyard Apartments (Entire Lot) 40’ Minimum Dependent on Comprehensive Plan Density, Site Design and Parking Requirements. Not permitted in cul-de-sac or dead end.Page 8 of 24 CA2022-001 –Residential Design Standards Setbacks HOME TYPE Building Setbacks Front Rear Side SFDU –Detached, Duplexes (Living Unit)15’*15’5’ SFDU –Attached, Townhome, Cottage Housing, Multiplex/Apartments^ 12’**,+15’5’ *Permitted when/if attached garage is setback at least 20’, or accessed via rear alley or shared private driveway; no encroachment of a utility easement permitted **Permitted with shared driveway is used and parking is located in middle or rear of development + When building is accessed directly from public streets, standards of SFDUs-Detached shall apply ^Multiplex/Apartments or mixed use buildings permitted without a minimum setback if abutting a sidewalk 8’ or wider and has garage or parking located on the back or side of the site. A 5’ landscaping buffer setback is required when abutting sidewalks below 8’ Page 9 of 24 CA2022-001 –Residential Design Standards Height & Lot Coverage Home Type Building Height & Lot Coverage R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 Bldg. Height Lot Coverage Bldg. Height Lot Coverage Bldg. Height Lot Coverage Bldg. Height Lot Coverage SFDU - Detached 35’60%35’60%40’60%40’60% SFDU – Attached 35’60%35’ Dependent on Comprehensive Plan Density, Site Regs and Parking Requirements. 40’ Dependent on Comprehensiv e Plan Density, Site Regs and Parking Requirements. 40’ Dependent on Comprehensiv e Plan Density, Site Regs and Parking Requirements. Cottage Housing 25’60%25’25’25’ Multiplex / Apartments 35’60%45’45’45’Page 10 of 24 CA2022-001 –Residential Design Standards Parking &Access Parking and Driveways –Multiplex/Apartments Off-Street Parking Off-Street Parking Location •Studio and 1brm units: Reduced to 1 space •Permitted adjacent to public frontage. May not exceed 10% of total off -street parking or 20% of entire frontage length (combined). •When permitted adjacent to public frontage, must be screened with a minimum of 15’ of approved landscaping. •Parking areas shall be designed to incorporate incremental breaks to provide adequate access, turnaround, and circulation. Page 11 of 24 CA2022-001 –Residential Design Standards Pedestrian Access and Circulation Pedestrian Circulation •Dedicated pedestrian network between parking lots, public streets and sidewalks, open spaces, and community facilities. •Shall provide pedestrian and bicycle access within and onto the site. Access points onto the site shall be provided (a) approximately every 330’ to 660’ feet along existing and proposed perimeter sidewalks and walkways, and (b) at all arrival points to the site •Walkways shall form an on-site circulation system that minimizes the conflict between pedestrians and traffic at all points. Walkways shall be provided when the pedestrian access point onto the site, or any parking space, is more than 60’ feet from the building entrance or principal on-site destination. •Conformance with ADA design standards Page 12 of 24 CA2022-001 –Residential Design Standards Questions?Page 13 of 24 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council August 11, 2023 TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 8/14/23 FROM: Jacob Gonzalez, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Discussion - Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Housing - Moratorium I. REFERENCE(S): Resolution No 4317: SRO Moratorium Continuation Staff Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In February 2019, the Pasco City Council adopted Ordinance No. 4425 amending the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Title 25: Zoning, to allow Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Housing Developments (PMC Chapter 25.162). Provisions of PMC 25.162 restrict SROs to the C-1, C-2, and C-3 zoning districts with regulates also City The permit. approval conditional a of the use onstandards, development including -minimum and management, site requirements for bathrooms, kitchens, and other facilities/amenities based on the number of dwelling units. On March 7, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No 4158, declaring a moratorium prohibiting the permitting and converting of SRO units. This was followed by the adoption of Resolution No. 4241 on Se ptember 6, 2022, adopting findings, which are paraphrased below: • Impacts on residential and commercial neighborhoods • Impacts on city infrastructure (roads and traffic), and parking Page 14 of 24 • Evaluation of SROs as part of the Housing Action and Implementation Plan An extension of the moratorium was adopted on March 6, 2023, via Resolution No. 4317, to continue the evaluation of the findings adopted by the Council and identify potential new standards in line with best practices with respect to the overall housing efforts undertaken by the City. The moratorium is set to expire on September 7, 2023, unless otherwise terminated or extended. V. DISCUSSION: The staff has collected information on current applications/permits of SROs, along with best practices and policies. The intent is to provide Council with a summary of how current SROs are performing in the Tri-Cities region and identify potential revisions to the current SRO regulations to be applied following the expiration of the moratorium. SRO Projects To date, Pasco has two approved permits for SROs. One project is located at 1520 N Oregon (The Alegra), which includes the conversion of 104 units. This project is currently 48% occupied, with rental prices between $995 - $1,145 based on the floor plan. A second project, located at 1800 W Lewis Street (The Loyalty Inn), has been on pause due to developer financing. It is anticipated this project will restart in late August, which includes the conversion of 161 units. The City of Kennewick anticipates issuing a certificate of occupancy on its first SRO projects by the end of August, which will result in the conversion of 132 units. The City of Richland currently has one SRO project operating, of which 25% of the 204 units are occupied. With regards to the operation and conditions of the SROs (region -wide), there have not been any reported or documented violations associated with the housing developments. With the developments being recently completed, and tenants still moving in, there is simply not enough data or information to report on. Development of New Standards/Regulations SROs play an important role in the overall housing option cycle, pa rticularly because they are intended to provide more affordable options for residents seeking housing. While affordability is intended, it is important to acknowledge that without an affordability requirement, prices are subject to local market rates. Page 15 of 24 The City currently allows SROs in the C-1, C-2, and C-3 zoning districts. While the C-2 district is centered in Downtown, the C-1 and C-3 districts are dispersed spatially across the city. A special focus on access and location should be considered. Site projects in and near commercial nodes near stores and resources utilized by the target renters or tenants, including but not limited to locations that have access to public transit, with the development type/size fitted to the neighborhood (scale, form, density). The City may also want to draft separate requirements that accommodate the conversion of motel units versus new construction or development of SROs. Housing Action and Implementation Plan The Housing Action and Implementation Plan is expected to receive a recommendation from the Pasco Planning Commission at the August meeting. The plan identified that Pasco has an undersupply of 1,700 housing units. With an expected need of over 23,000 new units by the year 2045, 29% are anticipated to be needed at income levels below 50% of the Area Median Income (less than $50,850). City staff has confirmed with impacted organizations and agencies, including the Home Builders Association of the Tri-Cities, Visit Tri-Cities, and the Housing Authority of Franklin County/City of Pasco regarding SROs. Generally, input has supported the allowance of SROs to serve the housing needs of the region, and that SROs are not impacting the availability of hotel units for tourism. As Pasco continues to experience significant growth, the demand for housing will continue to increase. SRO housing can help alleviate the pressure on the housing market by offering an alternative to traditional apartments or homes. Staff is supportive of SROs as an option and tool available by developers to supply much-needed housing, and would recommend identifying the appropriate measures to address the location and management of the SRO code as part of the expiration of the moratorium. Page 16 of 24 RESOLUTION NO. 4317 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, CONTINUING THE MORATORIUM ESTABLISHED THROUGH RESOLUTION NO. 4241 PROHIBITING PERMITTING SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY SRO) HOUSING AND CONVERSION THERETO 1N THE CITY OF PASCO PENDING STUDY OF IMPACTS AND BEST DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES AND POLICY WHEREAS,pursuant to Ordinance 4425 passed on February 19, 2019, the City of Pasco made provision in its code, at 25.162 for siting SRO facilities in its C-1 (Retail Business), C-2 Central Business District}, and C-3 (General Business District); and WHEREAS, the purpose of Ordinance 4425 was to address non-compliance of certain public nuisance properties, while also providing for low-income housing for City residents; and WHEREAS, SROs have historically provided low-income housing to both men and women dating back to the 19 Century; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco sees the potential for real impact to the City's homeless populations, but lacks current information necessary to ensure that best practices in terms of development and SRO policy are utilized to reach the greatest number of residents; and WHEREAS, the City has identified appropriate zones in which to locate SROs, but currently lacks codes, regulations, and policies which could best effectuate the original intent behind Ordinance 4425; and WHEREAS, SRO housing policies include a range of broad topics warranting review of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rules and regulations relating to policy limits, to ensure equal and fair treatment of all SRO residents in the City of Pasco; and WHEREAS, the City adopted Resolution No. 4158 on March 7, 2022, declaring a moratorium which prohibited the permitting and conversion of additional SRO units; and WHEREAS, the City is undertaking a housing capacity plan process that will analyze a variety of issues and options directly relating provision of housing and housing affordability and include the opportunity for further public comment and input; and WHEREAS,the City conducted a public hearing on SRO Moratorium on March 6, 2023, to consider comments relating to this Moratorium; and WHEREAS,RCW 36.70A.390 allows for a moratorium to be extended by six months as long as a public hearing and findings are adopted prior to any extension; and Resolution—SRO Moratorium- 1 Page 17 of 24 WHEREAS, the City adopted Resolution No. 4241 on September 7, 2022, extending the Moratorium established through Resolution No. 4158 which prohibited the permitting and conversion of additional SRO units, for an additional six (6)months; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,hereby resolves as follows: Section 1. Findin s. After a public hearing on March 6, 2023 was held, the below findings are hereby adopted: A. The impacts to the City due to the application of SROs could be significant on the City's roads and traffic system; B. There may also be parking implications that would have impacts on the City; C. SROs may also affect residential and commercial neighborhoods in the City; and D. The City needs time to evaluate the impacts and to address them in terms of potential regulations of SROs. Section 2. Term of Moratorium. The Moratorium shall be extended six (6) months from the date of its authorization by the City Council of the City of Pasco. Section 3. Moratorium Continued. The Moratorium established through Resolution 4158 and continued through Resolution 4241 is hereby extended to allow for the City to conduct a study on SRO's impacts and best practices in terms of development standards and housing policy. Section 4. Effective Date. Resolution No. 4158 shall remain in effect for an additional six (6) months, expiring on the 7th day of September, 2023, unless otherwise terminated or extended. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this 6th day of March, 2023. l Blanc arajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1. < Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Fer aw, PLLC City Clerk City orneys Resolution—SRO Moratorium-2 Page 18 of 24 Single Room Occupancy Housing (SROs) Single Room Occupancy •February 2019:SROs permitted as housing option (Ordinance No 4425) •March 2022: SRO Moratorium Established (Resolution No 4158) •September 2022:Adopted Moratorium Findings (Resolution No 4251) •March 2023:Continuation of Moratorium (Resolution No 4317)Page 19 of 24 Single Room Occupancy Housing (SROs) What are SROs?Page 20 of 24 Single Room Occupancy Housing (SROs) What are SROs?Page 21 of 24 Single Room Occupancy Housing (SROs) SROs in Tri-Cities Name Location # of Units Status % Occupied Rent The Alegre 1520 N Oregon, Pasco 104 2/3 Complete --$995 -$1,145 Loyalty Inn 1800 W Lewis, Pasco 161 Paused ----- The Franklin 1515 George Washington Way, Richland 204 Complete 24%$1,225 - $1,525 The Q 7901 W Quinault Ave, Kennewick 132 Complete 0%$1,150 - $1,425Page 22 of 24 QUALITY OF LIFE Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re- investment in community infrastructure including, but not limited to: • Completion of Transportation System Master Plan and design standard updates to promote greater neighborhood cohesion in new and re-developed neighborhoods through design elements, e.g.; connectivity, walkability, aesthetics, sustainability, and community gathering spaces. • Completion of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan and development of an implementation strategy to enhance such services equitably across the community. • Completion of the Housing Action and Implementation Plan with a focus on a variety of housing to address the needs of the growing population. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services and programs, including, but not limited to: • Adopting policies and strategic investment standards to assure consistency of long-range planning to include update of impact fees, area fees to specific infrastructure, and SEPA mitigation measures related to new development, e.g.; schools, traffic, parks, and fire. COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system including, but not limited to: • Application of the adopted Transportation System Master Plan including development of policies, regulations, programs, and projects that provide for greater connectivity, strategic investment, mobility, multi -modal systems, accessibility, efficiency, and safety. COMMUNITY SAFETY Promote proactive approaches for the strategic investment of infrastructure, staffing, and equipment including, but not limited to: • Adoption and develop implementation strategies for Comprehensive Fire Master Plan aimed at maintaining the current Washington State Rating Bureau Class 3 community rating. • Collaboration with regional partners to influence strategies to reduce incidences of homeless by leveraging existing resources such as the newly implemented 0.1% mental health sales tax, use of resource navigator programs, and other efforts. • Development of an implementation strategy for the Comprehensive Police Master Plan to support future service levels of the department to assure sustainability, public safety, officer safety, crime control, and compliance with legislative mandates. ECONOMIC VITALITY Promote and encourage economic vitality including, but not limited to: • Implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan through related actions including zoning code changes, phased sign code update, and development regulations and standards. • Completion of Area Master Plans and environmental analysis complementing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan such as Downtown and Broadmoor Master Plans. • Development of an Economic Development Plan, including revitalization efforts. COMMUNITY IDENTITY Identify opportunities to enhance community identity, cohesion, and image including, but not limited to: • Development of a Community Engagement Plan to evaluate strategies, technologies, and other opportunities to further inclusivity, community engagement, and inter-agency and constituent coordination efforts. • Support of the Arts and Culture Commission in promoting unity and the celebration of diversity through art and culture programs, recognition of significant events or occurrences, and participation/sponsorship of events within the community. Page 23 of 24 CALIDAD DE VIDA Promover una calidad de vida alta a través de programas de calidad, servicios, inversiones y reinversiones apropiadas en la infraestructura de la comunidad incluyendo, pero no limitado a: • Terminar el Plan de Transportación para promover más cohesión entre nuestras vecindades actuales y re-desarrolladas a través de elementos de diseño, p.ej. conectividad, transitabilidad, sostenibilidad estética, y espacios para reuniones comunitarias. • Terminar el Plan de los Parques, la Recreación, y los Espacios Vacíos y el desarrollo de una estrategia de implementación para mejorar tales servicios justamente a lo largo de la comunidad. • Terminar el Plan de Acción e Implementación de Viviendas con un enfoque en una variedad de viviendas para tratar las necesidades del aumento en la población. SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA Mejorar la viabilidad a largo plazo, el valor, y los niveles de los servicios y los programas, incluyendo, pero no limitado a: • Adoptar las políticas y los estándares de inversión estratégica para asegurar consistencia en la planificación a largo plazo para incluir la actualización de las tarifas de impacto, las tarifas en áreas de infraestructura específica, y las medidas de mitigación SEPA relacionadas con el nuevo desarrollo, p.ej. escuelas, tráfico, parques, e incendios. RED DE TRANSPORTACION COMUNITARIA Promover un sistema de transportación multimodal en alta operación incluyendo, pero no limitado a: • Aplicar el Plan de Transportación que fue adoptado, incluyendo el desarrollo de las políticas, las reglas, los programas, y los proyectos que proporcionan más conectividad, inversión estratégica, movilidad, sistemas multimodales, accesibilidad, eficiencia, y seguridad. SEGURIDAD COMUNITARIA Promover métodos proactivos para la inversión estratégica en la infraestructura, el personal, y el equipo incluyendo, pero no limitado a: • Adoptar y desarrollar estrategias de implementación para el Plan Comprehensivo para Incendios. Con el propósito de mantener la clasificación comunitaria actual en la tercera Clase del Departamento de Clasificación del Estado de Washington. • Colaborar con socios regionales para influenciar estrategias que reduzcan los incidentes de personas sin hogar al hacer uso de los recursos actuales como el impuesto de ventas de 0.1% implementado recientemente para la salud mental, el uso de programas para navegar los recursos, y otros esfuerzos. • Desarrollar una estrategia de implementación para el Plan Comprehensivo de la Policía para apoyar los niveles futuros de servicio del departamento para asegurar la sostenibilidad, la seguridad pública, la seguridad de los policías, el control de crímenes, y el cumplimiento con los mandatos legislativos. VITALIDAD ECONOMICA Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica incluyendo, pero no limitado a: • Implementar el Plan Comprehensivo del Uso de Terreno a través de acciones relacionadas, incluyendo cambios de los códigos de zonificación, actualización en las etapas de los códigos de las señales, y el desarrollo de las reglas y los estándares. • Terminar los Planes de las Áreas y un análisis ambiental el cual complementa al plan integral de uso de la tierra como a los Planes del Centro y de Broadmoor. • Desarrollar un Plan de Desarrollo Económico, el cual incluya esfuerzos de revitalización. IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la cohesión, y la imagen incluyendo, pero no limitado a: • Desarrollar un Plan de Participación de la Comunidad para evaluar las estrategias, las tecnologías, y otras oportunidades para promover la inclusividad, la participación de la comunidad, y los esfuerzos interdepartamentales y de coordinación de los constituyentes. • Apoyar a la Comisión de las Artes y Cultura al promover la unidad y la celebración de la diversidad a través de programas de arte y cultura, reconocer eventos o acontecimientos significantes, y participar/patrocinar eventos dentro de la comunidad. Page 24 of 24