HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023.07.10 Council Workshop Packet
AGENDA
City Council Workshop Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, July 10, 2023
Pasco City Hall, Council Chambers & GoToWebinar
Page
1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - The Pasco City Council
Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum
Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive
and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco.
To listen to the meeting via phone, call (415) 655-0060 and use access code
307-404-066.
2. CALL TO ORDER
3. ROLL CALL
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
4. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
5. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
3 - 13 (a) Update on Hanford Communities
Presented by Executive Director of Hanford Communities, David
Reeploeg
14 - 20 (b) Ordinance - Amending the Pasco Municipal Code Title 25 Related
to Residential Design Standards
21 - 410 (c) Shoreline Master Program Approval (MF# PLAN 2013-001)
6. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION
8. ADJOURNMENT
Page 1 of 412
9. ADDITIONAL NOTES
411 - 412 (a) Adopted 2020-2021 Council Goals (Reference Only)
(b) REMINDERS
• Monday, July 10, 11:45 AM: Pasco Chamber of Commerce
Membership Lunch Meeting – Pasco Red Lion Hotel
• Monday, July 10, 6:00 PM: Old Fireman’s Pension Board
Meeting – City Hall Conference Room 1, Pasco City Hall
(MAYOR BLANCHE BARAJAS, Rep.; MAYOR PRO TEM
CRAIG MALONEY, Alt.)
• Wednesday, July 12, 11:00 AM; Schlagel Park Grand
Opening Ceremony - Schlagel Park (COUNCIL)
• Thursday, July 13, 5:30 PM: Parks & Recreation Advisory
Board, Council Chambers, Pasco City Hall
(COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE, Rep.;
COUNCILMEMBER PETE SERRANO, Alt.)
• Thursday, July 13, 7:00 PM: Ben Franklin Transit Board
Meeting – Benton County Administration Building
(COUNCILMEMBER JOSEPH CAMPOS Rep.; MAYOR PRO TEM
CRAIG MALONEY, Alt.)
• Monday, July 17, 6:00 PM: LEOFF Disability Board – City Hall
Conference Room 1, Pasco City Hall (MAYOR BLANCH
BARAJAS, Rep.; MAYOR PRO TEM CRAIG MALONEY, Alt.)
This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the
Clerk for assistance.
Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor
avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la
disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter service may be
provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice
to the City Clerk to ensure availability.)
Page 2 of 412
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 5, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 7/10/23
FROM: Adam Lincoln, City Manager
City Manager
SUBJECT: Update on Hanford Communities
I. REFERENCE(S):
Hanford Communities Annual Update Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
None
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Hanford Communities was formed and exists to facilitate a coordinated local
government involvement in decision making regarding Hanford Nuclear
Reservation's environmental contamination, remediation, waste management,
emergency response, and work force, as well as site transition issues on issues
affecting the surrounding jurisdictions. The organization advocates for increased
public awareness and involvement in Hanford's cleanup issues. Board members
interact with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the W ashington State
Department of Ecology, the U.S. Department of Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and others to further the interests of the Tri-Cities region. Hanford
Communities member agencies consist of the Cities of Kennewick, Pasco,
Richland and West Richland, Benton and Franklin Counties and the Port of
Benton.
Councilmember Roach serves as the Pasco City Council representative on the
Hanford Communities Governing Board.
Page 3 of 412
V. DISCUSSION:
Executive Director of Hanford Communities, David Reeploeg, will provide the
annual report to Council.
Page 4 of 412
Page 5 of 412
•
•Page 6 of 412
•
•
•
•
•
•
•Page 7 of 412
•
•
•
•
•
•
•Page 8 of 412
•
•
•
•
•
•Page 9 of 412
•
•
•
•
•
•
•Page 10 of 412
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•Page 11 of 412
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•Page 12 of 412
Page 13 of 412
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 6, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 7/10/23
FROM: Jacob Gonzalez, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Ordinance - Amending the Pasco Municipal Code Title 25 Related to
Residential Design Standards
I. REFERENCE(S):
Exhibit A: Residential Design Standards, Phase 1 (CA2022-001)
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
None
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
City staff are preparing a substantial update to the Pasco Municipal Code to
accommodate a variety of residential housing options and typologies, increase
development flexibility and clarity, and accommodate local market needs. Work
on Phase 1 began in December 2021 and was initiated with the help of the Home
Builders Association of the Tri-Cities (HBA-TC) and to supplement the upcoming
Housing Action and Implementation Plan.
The proposed recommendations are being conducted with the assistance of
planning consultant, Oneza and Associates. This effort is intended to the first
phase of several that follow recent changes associated with House Bill 1923,
adopted by Council in January 2022.
The purpose of this staff report is to provide Council with an introduction to the
proposal, and highlight key revisions to the Pasco Zoning Code. Staff is prepared
to follow this report with several workshops throughout the summer/fall.
Page 14 of 412
Policy Guidance
Proposed shall be consistent with the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan,
including:
• Land Use Policy 1-5: Enhance the physical appearance of development
within the community through land use regulations, design guidelines,
and performance and maintenance standards including landscaping,
screening, building facades, color, signs, and parking lot design and
appearance.
• Land Use Goal 2: Plan for a variety of compatible uses within the Urban
Growth Area.
• Land Use Policy 3-C: Ensure all developments include appropriate
landscaping and screening, as required by adopted regulations and
guidelines.
• Land Use Policy 4-B: Encourage infill and higher density uses within
proximity to major travel corridors and public transportation service areas.
• Land Use Policy 4-F: Support mixed use, smart growth, infill, and compact
developments with transit and pedestrian amenities that promote a
healthy community
• Land Use Policy 5-A: states that the allowance of a variety of residential
densities within the Urban Growth Area is important in maintaining a
broad range of residential housing opportunities.
• Housing Policy 3-A: Pasco Comprehensive Plan supports the increase of
the housing supply through appropriate and flexible development
standards.
Proposed Recommendations
The changes will impact various elements of Title 25 "Zoning" of the Pasco
Municipal Code. Staff focused revisions on the following key features:
This update will focus on the following components:
• Lot Sizes and Dimensions
• Lot Frontages
• Setbacks
• Building Orientation
• Parking and Driveways
• Site Access and Circulation
Page 15 of 412
These elements were selected after receiving a proposal from the Home Builders
Association of the Tri-Cities. These elements were also indicated as barriers in
the results of a 2021 Housing Survey conducted by staff which solicited feedback
from housing developers, stakeholders, and builders.
Planning Commission Summary
The Pasco Planning Commission recommended the draft ordinance at the
November 2022 meeting. The table below summarizes meetings and public
hearings held with the Planning Commission.
Meeting Type Month - Year
Workshop December 2021
Workshop January 2022
Workshop February 2022
Workshop March 2022
Public Hearing April 2022
Public Hearing May 2022
Workshop September 2022
Public Hearing October 2022
In addition to the meetings above, this effort has been shared and communicated
with various stakeholders in the housing development community. Staff has held
three meetings to ensure that the proposed changes are practical in addressing
much needed housing flexibility.
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff acknowledges the significant impact of the proposed changes, which aim
to enhance housing options, increase flexibility in the development process, and
align with the goals of the Pasco Comprehensive Plan. Staff has prepared a
matrix of recommendations for Planning Commission discussion and is attached
as Exhibit A.
the proposed ordinance will necessitate a restructuring of the Zoning Code (PMC
Title 25). The aim is to create a more user-friendly and efficient structure that
enables applicants to navigate development regulations and requirements with
ease. By simplifying the PMC, we hope to streamline the administration process
for city staff. The new structure will primarily focus on key design elements, such
as and rather setbacks, coverage lot th list lengthy a on relying of an
requirements as currently depicted in the PMC.
Page 16 of 412
Furthermore, the proposed Residential Design Standards amendment
exemplifies the city's ongoing commitment to updating its development
regulations in response to market demands and the increasing need for a diverse
range of housing options.
Staff welcomes City Council input and feedback on the proposal, which will help
guide follow up discussions and workshops.
Page 17 of 412
Code Amendment CA2022-001: Residential Design Standards, Phase 1 November 1, 2022
CA2022-001: Residential Design Standards, Phase 1
Home Type Minimum Lot Size (SQFT) Per Unit
R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4
SFDU – Detached 7,200 / DU 5,000 / DU 3,000 / DU 2,000 / DU
SFDU - Attached
•Townhome/Rowhouse 3,600 / DU 3,000 / DU 2,000 / DU 1,500 / DU
•Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex 3,600 / DU 2,500 / DU 2,000 / DU 1,500 / DU
•Cottage House,
Courtyard Housing (4-12
units)
3,600 2,000 1,800 1,500
Multiplex/Apartments Dependent on Comprehensive Plan Density, Site Design and Parking
Requirements.
PGS 7, Draft Pasco Residential Design Standards
Home Type Minimum Site Frontage & Width (FT)
R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4
SFDU – Detached 60’/ DU 40’ / DU 40’ / DU 30’ / DU
SFDU - Attached
•Townhome/Rowhouse 35’ / DU 25’ / DU 20’ / DU 20’ / DU
•Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex 60’ / Lot 40’ / Lot 40’ / Lot 30’ / Lot
•Cottage House (Entire
Lot)60’ / Lot 40’ / Lot 40’ / Lot 30’ / Lot
Multiplex/Apartments,
Courtyard Apartments
(Entire Lot)
40’ Minimum Dependent on Comprehensive Plan Density, Site Design
and Parking Requirements. Not permitted in cul-de-sac or dead end.
PGS 8, Draft Pasco Residential Design Standards
HOME TYPE Building Setbacks
Front Rear Side
SFDU – Detached, Duplexes (Living
Unit) 15’* 15’ 5’
SFDU – Attached, Townhome,
Cottage Housing,
Multiplex/Apartments^
12’**,+ 15’ 5’
*Permitted when/if attached garage is setback at least 20’, or accessed via rear alley or shared
private driveway; no encroachment of a utility easement permitted
**Permitted with shared driveway is used and parking is located in middle or rear of development
+ When building is accessed directly from public streets, standards of SFDUs-Detached shall apply
^Multiplex/Apartments or mixed use buildings permitted without a minimum setback if abutting a
sidewalk 8’ or wider and has garage or parking located on the back or side of the site. A 5’
landscaping buffer setback is required when abutting sidewalks below 8’
PGS 11-12 Draft Pasco Residential Design Standards
EXHIBIT A
Page 18 of 412
Code Amendment CA2022-001: Residential Design Standards, Phase 1 November 1, 2022
Home Type
Building Height & Lot Coverage
R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4
Bldg. Height Lot Coverage Bldg.
Height Lot Coverage Bldg.
Height Lot Coverage Bldg.
Height Lot Coverage
SFDU -
Detached 35’ 45% 35’ 50% 40’ 60% 40’ 60%
SFDU –
Attached 35’ 60% 35’ Dependent on
Comprehensive
Plan Density, Site
Regs and Parking
Requirements.
40’ Dependent on
Comprehensive
Plan Density, Site
Regs and Parking
Requirements.
40’ Dependent on
Comprehensive
Plan Density, Site
Regs and Parking
Requirements.
Cottage
Housing 25’ 60% 25’ 25’ 25’
Multiplex /
Apartments 35’ 60% 45’ 45’ 45’
PGS 12 Draft Pasco Residential Design Standards
Parking and Driveways – Multiplex/Apartments
Off-Street Parking Off-Street Parking Location Driveways
• Studio and 1brm units:
Reduced to 1 space
• Permitted adjacent to public frontage. May
not exceed 10% of total off-street parking or
20% of entire frontage length (combined).
• When permitted adjacent to public frontage,
must be screened with a minimum of 15’ of
approved landscaping.
• Parking areas shall be designed to incorporate
incremental breaks to provide adequate
access, turnaround, and circulation.
• Minimum distance of 15’ between
entrance/exit of site and nearest parking stall.
• Internal and shared accessways or
driveways shall be a minimum 26’
width, except for PMC 21.20.060
PGS 16-18 Draft Pasco Residential Design Standards
Parking and Driveways – SFDUs (Attached & Detached)
Off-Street Parking Location Driveways
• Minimum distance of 15’ between entrance/exit of site
and nearest parking stall.
• Recommended: SFDUs-attached, parking shall be
located via rear access. Required when adjacent to
arterial or collector roadways.
• Shared driveways permitted, minimum 26’ width, except
for PMC 21.20.060
• Attached DUs: No Maximum
• Detached DUs: Maximum of 4 DUs on shared driveways
• Attached DUs: driveways encouraged to have shared
driveway from public street
• Driveways that exceed 50% of lot width are not
permitted. When driveways of individual dwellings
exceed more than 50% of lot width, they must include
one or more of the following treatments:
o Shared driveway or Driveway access via alley or
rear access
o Minimum driveway length of 20’ with sidewalk
located behind the curb-cut and not interrupted
with slope.
Page 19 of 412
Code Amendment CA2022-001: Residential Design Standards, Phase 1 November 1, 2022
Pedestrian & Vehicle Circulation
Pedestrian Circulation Vehicle Circulation
• Multiplex/Apartments and Multiple Dwellings:
Dedicated pedestrian network between parking lots,
public streets and sidewalks, open spaces, and
community facilities.
• Shall provide pedestrian and bicycle access within and
onto the site. Access points onto the site shall be
provided (a) approximately every 330’ to 660’ feet
along existing and proposed perimeter sidewalks and
walkways, and (b) at all arrival points to the site,
including abutting street intersections, crosswalks,
and transit and school bus stops. In addition, access
points to and from adjacent lots shall be coordinated
to provide circulation patterns between sites.
• Walkways shall form an on-site circulation system
that minimizes the conflict between pedestrians and
traffic at all points of pedestrian access to on-site
parking and building entrances. Walkways shall be
provided when the pedestrian access point onto the
site, or any parking space, is more than 60’ feet from
the building entrance or principal on-site destination.
• Conformance with ADA design standards
• Minimum with (internal access) of 26’ with a turning radius
of 26’
PGS 19-20 Draft Pasco Residential Design Standards
Page 20 of 412
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 5, 2023
TO: Adam Lincoln, City Manager
City Council Workshop
Meeting: 7/10/23
FROM: Jacob Gonzalez, Interim Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Shoreline Master Program Approval (MF# PLAN 2013-001)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Draft Resolution adopting the 2023 Shoreline Master Program
Draft Ordinance Amending PMC Title 29 Shoreline Regulations
Planning Commission Packet dated 18 May 2023
PowerPoint Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
shoreline for foundation the is The Act Management Shoreline (SMA)
management in Washington State. The SMA requires each town, city, and
county to review, and, if necessary, revise its Shoreline Master Program (SMP)
every eight years per Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 90.58.80.
The City received a $28,000 Washington State Department of Ecology grant to
review and update the City’s SMP which agreement was executed in May 2022.
The City of Pasco last updated their SMP in 2015. Now, in coordination with the
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), the City has completed the
periodic review process to review and revise its SMP. The periodic review
addresses recent changes in SMA requirements, changes for consistency with
revised comprehensive plans and regulations, and any other changes deemed
Page 21 of 412
necessary to reflect changed circumstances, new information, or improved data
(see attached: Draft Shoreline Master Program Update).
The SMA was ratified by state voters in 1972 and is codified in RCW 90.58 . Its
overarching and uncoordinated caused harm by “to is purpose prevent
piecemeal development of the state’s major shorelines.” The SMA applies to all
shorelands and “Shorelines of the State” on waterbodies meeting size and flow
requirements as defined by the SMA (RCW 90.58.030).
The SMA requires all counties and most towns and cities in the state that have
shorelines to develop and implement SMPs. SMPs are approved at the local
level and by Ecology in an integrated approval process, consistent with th e RCW
and the SMP guidelines provided in Washington Administrative Code (WAC)
127-26.
Public Workshops:
• January 3, 2023
• February 16, 2023
Public Hearings:
• April 20, 2023
• May 18, 2023
• June 14, 2023
Shoreline Master Programs are both planning and regulatory documents,
designed to carry out the policies of the Shoreline Management Act on local
shorelines. An SMP consists of a comprehensive use plan, use regulations,
maps, diagrams or other descriptive material, and a statement of desired goals
and standards. SMPs are based on state laws and rules and are tailored to local
geographic and environmental conditions and existing development patterns.
Per PMC 29.20, the SMP regulates the approval and issuance of development
permits agriculture, facilities, boating for within shoreline the jurisdiction
breakwater, jetties, groins, and weirs, commercial development, dredging and
dredge material disposal, fill and excavation, industrial development, in -stream
structures, residential mining, piers and docks, recreational development,
development, shoreline habitat and natural systems enhancement projects,
shoreline stabilization, transportation, trails, roads, and parking, and utilities.
Over the last 20 years the City has reviewed approximately 62 Shoreline
applications, most relating to permits for private dock placement or repairs. A
handful of agency (City of Pasco, Port of Pasco, Franklin County) projects, such
as levee lowering, bridge repairs or painting, are also in the mix, as well as a few
commercial/industrial permit applications.
Page 22 of 412
V. DISCUSSION:
The State of Washington Department of Ecology is responsible for overseeing
the SMP periodic review process consistent with the SMA and the applicable
WAC administrative guidelines. Ecology must also formally approve the locally
approved SMP amendments. Local jurisdictions are responsible for ensuring the
SMP complies with local requirements and is consistent with local plans and
policies, as well as state law.
The City of Pasco planning staff have been working with White Bluffs Consulting
to prepare changes to the 2015 SMP for consideration by the Planning
Commission, City Council and Ecology (See attached: Periodic Review
Checklist: 2021 Version).
Changes to the SMP were made in response to Washington State legislative
and agency (e.g., Department of Ecology, Office of Financial Management)
policy amendments (see attached May 18, 2023 PC Packet). The proposed
changes were made available to public agencies, NPOs, tribes, and the general
public via direct email, City of Pasco web posts, Ecology website post ing, and
public notice during a 60-day comment period held between February 24th and
April 25th 2023; comments have been indexed and addressed by staff and
consultant in a Comment Response Matrix, and are attached to this Planning
Commission Staff Report packet (See attached: City of Pasco SMP Periodic
Review Comment List).
Comments from agencies and concerned citizens included a Pasco citizen
complaint regarding a possible SMP code violation and possible remediation
measures; Department of Ecology recommendations to change the minimum
buffer width and to update several tables and references; various Pasco citizen
recommendations to modify verbiage, and add definitions; and several requests
from the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) to add
verbiage regarding historic, cultural, and archaeological resources.
The Planning Commission held a Joint Public Hearing with the Washington State
Department of Ecology on April 20th 2023. A presentation was prepared for the
Planning Commission and the public summarizing the proposed changes.
Proposed changes are required to comply with changes in Federal and State
laws and regulations enacted since the 2015 update; these are relatively minor
edits to the existing SMP.
The staff is looking forward to receiving feedback from the Council on the Draft
Shoreline Master Program Periodic Update. For your convenience, we have
attached a draft resolution that adopts the Shoreline Master Program, as well as
Page 23 of 412
a Draft ordinance PMC Title 29 Shoreline Regu lations. Your input and thoughts
on these documents are highly appreciated.
Page 24 of 412
Resolution – Shoreline Master Program (PLAN 2021-005) - 1
RESOLUTION NO. ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2023 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) is the foundation for shoreline
management in Washington State; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the SMA is to manage the shoreline to accommodate all
reasonable and appropriate uses consistent with protecting against adverse effects to the public
health, the land and its vegetation and wildlife; and
WHEREAS, the SMA requires each town, city, and county to review, and, if necessary,
revise its Shoreline Master Program (SMP) every eight years per the Revised Code of Washington
(RCW) 90.58.80; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco’s (City) SMP is a planning document that outlines the City's
shoreline goals and establishes regulations for development to ensure that all land use,
development, or other activity occurring within the designated shoreline jurisdiction is appropriate
for that area; and
WHEREAS, the City is required to complete an update of the existing SMP that is
consistent with procedural and substantive requirements of the SMA governed by RCW 90.58 and
WAC 173-26; and
WHEREAS, the City last updated their SMP September 19, 2016 by Ordinance No. 4314;
and
WHEREAS, City entered into a grant contract with the Washington State Department of
Ecology effective May 10, 2022, to update and amend its SMP consistent with the Shoreline
Management Act and Shoreline Master Program Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City has completed the periodic review process to review and revise its
SMP in coordination with the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology); and
WHEREAS, the periodic review addressed recent changes in SMA requirements, changes
for consistency with revised comprehensive plans and regulations, and any other changes deemed
necessary to reflect changed circumstances, new information, or improved data; and
WHEREAS, the proposed changes were made available to public agencies, NPOs, tribes,
and the general public via direct email, City of Pasco web posts, Ecology website posting, and
public notice during a 60-day comment period held between February 24 and April 25, 2023; and
WHEREAS, comments have been indexed and addressed by staff and consultant as part
of the SMP Update process; and
Page 25 of 412
Resolution – Shoreline Master Program (PLAN 2021-005) - 2
WHEREAS, on March 22, 2023 a Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendments 30-day
comment period and Joint Public Hearing notice and SEPA Checklist were sent to the agencies for
review (March 26, 2023 to April 25, 2023); and
WHEREAS, on April 20, 2023, the Planning Commission held a Joint Public Hearing
with the Washington State Department of Ecology to accept public testimony on the proposed
SMP Update, and that meeting was duly recorded; and
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2023, the Planning Commission held a Public Meeting to
recommend the SMP report and ancillary documents be sent on to Ecology for preliminary review,
and that meeting was duly recorded; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend to the
City Council approval of the SMP Update; and
WHEREAS, the SMP Update provides a document that outlines the City's amended
shoreline goals and regulations for development now and in the future; and
WHEREAS, the SMP Update achieves the goals and requirements of the SMA (RCW
90.58); and
WHEREAS, the proposal was reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act and a
Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposed SMP Update on June 19, 2023;
and
WHEREAS, Ecology approved the City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Update
without comment on June XX 2023; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the Shoreline Master Program Update is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit A as a
Shoreline Planning guide and supplement to the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 26 of 412
Resolution – Shoreline Master Program (PLAN 2021-005) - 3
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this 17th day of July,
2023.
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 27 of 412
CITY OF PASCO
DRAFT SHORELINE MASTER
PROGRAM UPDATE
Prepared for
City of Pasco
Prepared by Prepared with assistance from
Anchor QEA, LLCWhite Bluffs Consulting
8033 West Grandridge Avenue, Suite
A189205 East 36th Avenue
Kennewick, Washington 993376
Oneza & Associates
3131 Western Ave, Suite 316
Seattle, Washington 98121
This report was fFunded through a grant from the Washington State Department of Ecology
Planning Commission Review Draft: 10/15/2015
City Council Review: 10/26/2015
Adopted:
Approved:
Effective:
Style Definition: TOC 3
Formatted: Superscript
Page 28 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs ConsultingAnchor QEA/Oneza & Associates ii
Date 2023June 2015 (Revised October 2015) Formatted: Highlight
Page 29 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs ConsultingAnchor QEA/Oneza & Associates i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I: Shoreline Goals and Policies (RCW 90.58.100) ...................................................... 4
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4
2 Relationship Between Growth Management Act and Shoreline Management Act .. 4
3 Profile of the Shoreline Jurisdiction within the City of Pasco.................................... 5
3.1 Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers ..................................................................... 5
3.2 Shorelines of Statewide Significance ........................................................ 5
4 Development of Goals and Policies .............................................................................. 5
4.1 Economic Development Element ............................................................. 6
4.2 Public Access and Recreation Element .................................................... 7
4.3 Circulation Element ................................................................................... 9
4.4 Shoreline Uses and Modifications Element ............................................ 10
4.5 Conservation Element ............................................................................. 19
4.6 Historic, Cultural, Scientific, and Educational Resources Element ...... 21
4.7 Flood Hazard Management Element ...................................................... 22
4.8 Private Property Right ............................................................................ 23
SECTION I: Shoreline Goals and Policies (RCW 90.58.100) ....................................................... 1
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1
2 Relationship Between Growth Management Act and Shoreline Management Act 1
3 Profile of the Shoreline Jurisdiction within the City of Pasco .................................. 2
3.1 Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers ...................................................................... 2
3.2 Shorelines of Statewide Significance.......................................................... 2
4 Development of Goals and Policies .............................................................................. 2
4.1 Economic Development Element ............................................................... 3
4.2 Public Access and Recreation Element ....................................................... 4
4.3 Circulation Element .................................................................................... 6
4.4 Shoreline Uses and Modifications Element ................................................ 7
4.5 Conservation Element ............................................................................... 16
4.6 Historic, Cultural, Scientific, and Educational Resources Element .......... 18
4.7 Flood Hazard Management Element ........................................................ 19
4.8 Private Property Right............................................................................... 20
List of Tables
Table 1. Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers .......................................................................................... 5
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font, Font: Bold
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font, Font: Bold
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font, Font: Bold
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font, Font: Bold
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Page 30 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting ii
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
BMP best management practice
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
City City of Pasco
County Franklin County
CPTED Crime Prevention through Environmental Design
CWA Clean Water Act
Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map
GMA Growth Management Act
Guidelines SMA Guidelines (Chapter 173-26 WAC)
HPA hydraulic project approval
JARPA Joint Aquatic Resource Permits Application
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NRCS U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation
Service
OHWM ordinary high water mark
PMC Pasco Municipal Code
RCW Revised Code of Washington
SEPA State Environmental Policy Act
SHB Shorelines Hearings Board
SMA Washington State Shoreline Management Act
SMP Shoreline Master Program
SR subreach
SSWS shorelines of statewide significance
UGA urban growth area
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Page 31 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting iii
USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
WA DOH Washington State Department of Health
WAC Washington Administrative Code
WDFW Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife
WDNR Washington State Department of Natural Resources
Page 32 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 4
SECTION I: Shoreline Goals and Policies (RCW 90.58.100)
1 Introduction
The City of Pasco, through an updated Shoreline Master Program (SMP), intends to implement
the requirements of the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA) Revised Code of
Washington (RCW 90.58), the state SMA Guidelines (Chapter 173-26 Washington
Administrative Code [WAC]) (Guidelines), and the Shoreline Management Permit and
Enforcement Procedures (WAC 173-27).
The SMA was enacted in 1971 to provide for the management and protection of shorelines of the
state by regulating development in the shoreline area. The goal of the SMA is, “to prevent the
inherent harm in an uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the state's shorelines” (RCW
90.58.020). The SMA requires cities and counties to adopt an SMP to regulate shoreline
development and accommodate “all reasonable and appropriate uses” consistent with “protection
against adverse effects to the public health, the land and its vegetation and wildlife, and the
waters of the state and their aquatic life…and public rights of navigation.” The City of Pasco did
not have its own SMP prior to the 2015 comprehensive updatethis update. The City had adopted
by reference and implemented Franklin County’s SMP, which had been approved in 1974. The
SMP has again been updated in 2022 and 2023 as part of a periodic review and update.
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) approved the updated SMA Guidelines in
2003. The SMA and implementing SMP Guidelines require all towns, cities, and counties across
the state to comprehensively update their SMPs. The guidelines provide new requirements for
environmental protections, including meeting no net loss of ecological functions, providing
public access, accounting for advancements in science and shoreline management practices, and
establishing a clear relationship between the SMA and the Growth Management Act (GMA).
The updated version of theis SMP for the City of Pasco provides goals, policies, and regulations
for the development of Pasco shorelines consistent with the SMA and guidelines.
2 Relationship Between Growth Management Act and Shoreline
Management Act
An SMP contains goals, policies, regulations, and environment designation maps that guide
shoreline development in accordance with state requirements. Pasco's SMP is integrated with the
City's land use regulation system. Consistent with RCW 36.70A.480, the goals and policies
contained in this SMP shall be considered an element of the City's Comprehensive Growth
Management Plan (Comprehensive Plan) required by the GMA. All other portions of this SMP,
including the use regulations, are considered a part of the City's development regulations
required by the GMA.
The Inventory, Analysis, and Characterization Report; Restoration Plan; Cumulative Impacts
Analysis Report (which includes the “no net loss of shoreline ecological functions” analysis
findings); and Public Participation Plan are supporting documents and are not adopted as part of
this SMP or the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Page 33 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 5
The Inventory, Analysis, and Characterization Report establishes the baseline against which the
standard “no net loss of shoreline ecological functions” is measured. The Restoration Plan
identifies and prioritizes shoreline restoration opportunities that may be undertaken
independently or in conjunction with mitigation for development impacts to improve shoreline
ecological functions over time.
3 Profile of the Shoreline Jurisdiction within the City of Pasco
The Washington State SMA defines the Shoreline of the State as, “all ‘shorelines’ and
‘shorelines of statewide (SSWS)’ within the state” (RCW 90.58.030). The shoreline includes
floodways, land within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the waterways,
floodplains up to 200 feet from the floodway edge, and associated wetlands.
3.1 Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers
Pasco’s SMP encompasses shoreline along the Columbia River and Snake River. The City’s
shoreline waterbodies are listed in Table 1. Both the Columbia River and Snake River are
considered SSWS. See Section 3.2 for discussion on SSWS.
Table 1. Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers
Stream Name
Shoreline of Statewide
Significance
Total Length
Proposed Shoreline
Columbia River Yes 14.4 miles
Snake River Yes 2.8 miles
3.2 Shorelines of Statewide Significance
The entire shoreline jurisdiction in the City that includes the Columbia and Snake rivers are
considered SSWS, as listed in Table 1. The SMA designates certain shoreline areas as SSWS,
which are defined as “natural rivers or segments thereof” that have a mean annual flow of
200 cubic feet per second or more (or for streams east of the crest of the Cascades [RCW
90.58.030], the portion downstream from the first 300 square miles of drainage area) and lakes,
whether natural, artificial, or a combination thereof, of 1,000 acres or greater in surface area. The
Columbia and Snake rivers are SSWS based on the flow and upstream drainage criteria.
The SSWS protection and management goals are described in the Development of Goals and
Policies – Shoreline Uses and Modifications Element section.
4 Development of Goals and Policies
Goals express broad value statements that reflect the City’s vision of its shorelines. Goals also
provide a framework upon which the more detailed SMP shoreline use environments, policies,
regulations, and administrative procedures are based in subsequent chapters. Policies are more
detailed statements reflecting the City’s goals and visions for its shorelines. Policies provide
detail to the associated goals and act as a bridge between the goals and implementing regulations.
Page 34 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 6
The SMP goals and policies are categorized according to the SMP elements mandated in the
SMA. The general goal and policy statements found within each SMP element provide the policy
basis for the City’s SMP administration.
4.1 Economic Development Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Support water-oriented uses to maximize the positive economic
impact of tourism and recreational development.
(b) Goal B: Promote economic growth that conserves natural resources and
open spaces and maintains the environmental quality.
(c) Goal C: Maintain existing development and secure additional commercial
and industrial facilities and infrastructure necessary for existing and future
development in shoreline areas where it is most feasible, while
maintaining environmental quality.
(d) Goal D: Recognize the role of the rivers as a transportation corridor that
facilitates trade and economic growth. Protect and expand the assets
necessary in the rivers and on the shoreline to utilize that transportation
corridor to promote economic development.
(2) Policies:
(a) Ensure healthy, orderly economic growth by providing for those economic
activities that will be an asset to the local economy and for which the
adverse effects on the quality of the shoreline and surrounding
environment can be mitigated. Ensure any economic activity taking place
along the shoreline operates without causing irreparable harm to the site’s
environment or adjacent shoreline areas.
(b) Maintain and protect existing water-dependent and water-related
industries that support the City’s economy. Provide opportunities for
future expansions of such industries.
(c) Allow diversion of water for agricultural, commercial, and industrial
purposes consistent with the State’s water rights laws.
(d) Dredging of the rivers and shoreline transportation assets is a necessary
component of maintaining the capabilities of the rivers to serve as a
transportation corridor for inputs and outputs of industries within Pasco
and surrounding areas.
(e) Promote tourism and develop and maintain, as an economic asset, the
recreation and tourism industry along shorelines in a manner that will
enhance public enjoyment.
Page 35 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 7
(f) Work with the Port of Pasco, Franklin County, and other agencies to
ensure sustainable economic growth along the shoreline. Encourage
cooperative use of existing port facilities, including docks and piers, where
feasible and when they do not negatively affect the public safety.
(g) Give preference to economic activities in undeveloped areas, which either
leave natural or existing shoreline features such as trees, shrubs, grasses,
and wildlife habitat, unmodified, or modify them in a way that enhances
human awareness and appreciation of the shoreline and other natural and
non-natural surroundings.
(h) Encourage new water-dependent, water-related, and water-enjoyment
economic development in priority order.
(i) Where possible, encourage development that incorporates low-impact
development techniques into new projects and integrates architectural and
landscape elements that recognize the river environment.
(j) Require non-water-oriented commercial or recreational development to
provide for ecological restoration and public access as appropriate.
(k) Ensure new industrial and commercial uses will not result in a net loss of
shoreline ecological functions or have significant adverse impacts on
navigation, recreation, and public access.
4.2 Public Access and Recreation Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Promote, protect, and enhance physical and visual public access
along the shoreline of the Columbia and Snake rivers. Increase the amount
and diversity of public access along the shoreline consistent with private
property rights, public safety, and the natural shoreline character.
(b) Goal B: Maintain and enhance the existing public access system according
to the City’s Public Access Plan (Rivershore Linkage and Amenity Plan
approved by the City in 2012), building upon the City’s many types of
shoreline public access with new public access opportunities where
appropriate.
(c) Goal C: Provide physical and visual public access as feasible and when
new development creates demand for public access.
(d) Goal D: Ensure diverse, convenient, and adequate water-oriented
recreational opportunities along the shoreline for the public.
(e) Goal F: Give water-oriented shoreline recreational development priority
within shoreline jurisdiction.
Page 36 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 8
(2) Policies:
(a) Protect and enhance visual and physical access to shoreline, especially on
public properties. Provide visual access, such as viewpoints or view
corridors, in areas with limited physical access due to a steep slope or the
sensitive nature of the shoreline whenever possible.
(b) Ensure new developments, uses, and activities on or near the shoreline do
not impair or detract from the public’s access to the water. Where
practicable, public access to the shoreline should be enhanced.
(c) Design public access that minimizes potential impacts to private property
and individual privacy.
(d) Locate, design, manage, and maintain public access and recreation
facilities in a manner that protects shoreline ecological functions and
processes and the public’s health and safety.
(e) Identify opportunities for public access on publicly owned shorelines and
according to the City’s Public Access Plan. Encourage federal, state, and
local governments to provide public access and recreational uses on
existing shoreline properties according to their management policies such
as existing state parks, trails and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
lands along the Columbia River.
(f) Preserve, maintain, and enhance public access afforded by shoreline street
ends, public utilities, and rights-of-way.
(g) Provide physical and visual public access in the shoreline jurisdiction in
association with the following uses when feasible: residential
developments with five or more dwellings; commercial development; and
public agency recreational development.
(h) Provide public access and interpretive displays as part of publicly funded
restoration projects where significant ecological impacts are addressed.
(i) Allow for passive and active shoreline recreation that emphasizes location
along shorelines in association with the state, county and other public
agency parks, recreation, wildlife habitat, and open-space plans.
(j) Encourage a variety of compatible recreational experiences and activities
to satisfy the City’s diverse recreational needs such as parks, boat lunches,
docks, trails, and viewing platforms.
(k) Give water-dependent recreation priority water-enjoyment recreation uses.
Give water-enjoyment recreational uses priority over non-water-oriented
recreational uses.
Page 37 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 9
(l) Integrate and link water-oriented recreational facilities with other
amenities along the shoreline, such as walking trails, bicycle paths,
easements, and scenic drives when feasible. For example, encourage
connection between the Sacajawea Heritage Trail and the Columbia
Plateau Trail in Franklin County.
(m) Promote non-intensive recreational uses that avoid adverse effects to the
natural environment, do not contribute to flood hazards, and avoid damage
to the shoreline environment through modifications such as structural
shoreline stabilization or native vegetation removal.
4.3 Circulation Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Develop safe, convenient, and diversified circulation systems to
ensure efficient movement of people, goods, and services, with minimal
adverse impacts on the shoreline environment.
(2) Policies:
(a) Provide safe, reasonable, and adequate circulation systems to shorelines
where routes will minimize adverse effects on unique or fragile shoreline
features and existing ecological systems, while contributing to the
functional and visual enhancement of the shoreline.
(b) Within the shoreline jurisdiction, locate land circulation systems that are
not shoreline-oriented and as far from the land-water interface as
practicable to reduce interference with either natural shoreline resources or
other appropriate shoreline uses.
(c) Allow for maintenance and improvements to existing roads and parking
areas. Allow for necessary new roads and parking areas when other
locations outside of shoreline jurisdiction are not feasible.
(d) Plan and develop a circulation network, which is compatible with the
shoreline environment and respects and protects ecological and aesthetic
values in the shoreline of the state, as well as private property rights.
(e) In the circulation network, plan for pedestrian, bicycle, and public
transportation where appropriate. Circulation planning and projects should
support existing and proposed shoreline uses that are consistent with the
SMP.
(f) Promote existing transportation corridors for reuse for water-dependent
uses or public access when they are abandoned.
Page 38 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 10
(g) Encourage relocation or improvement of those circulation elements that
are functionally or aesthetically disruptive to the shoreline, public
waterfront access, and ecological functions.
(h) Plan parking areas to achieve optimum use. Where possible, parking
should serve more than one use (e.g., serving recreational use on
weekends and commercial use on weekdays).
(i) Encourage low-impact parking facilities such as those with gravels or
permeable pavements and bio-swales.
(j) Encourage trails and bicycle paths along shorelines in a manner
compatible with the natural character, resources, and ecology of the
shoreline.
(k) Encourage the linkage of shoreline parks, recreation areas, and public
access points with linear systems, such as hiking and bicycle paths,
easements, and scenic drives.
4.4 Shoreline Uses and Modifications Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Encourage shoreline development and uses that recognize the
City’s natural and cultural values and its unique aesthetic qualities offered
by its variety of shoreline environments, including, but not limited to,
reservoir-bounded river segments, flood protection levees, recreational
and industrial developments, riverine wetlands, open views, and plentiful
formal and informal public access.
(b) Goal B: The City recognizes and protects the functions and values of the
shoreline environments of statewide and local significance. For SSWS,
protection and management priorities are to:
(i) Recognize and protect statewide interest over local interest;
(ii) Preserve the natural character of the shoreline;
(iii) Provide long-term over short-term benefits;
(iv) Protect the resources and ecology of shoreline;
(v) Increase public access to publicly owned areas of shoreline; and
(vi) Increase recreational opportunities for the public in shoreline areas;
and.
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 39 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 11
(vii) Recognize the statewide interest in keeping the Columbia and
Snake rivers adequately dredged and maintained to facilitate trade.
(2) General Policies:
(a) Maintain areas within the shoreline jurisdiction with unique attributes for
specific long-term uses, including commercial, industrial, residential,
recreational, and open-space uses.
(b) Ensure proposed shoreline uses are distributed, located, and developed in a
manner that will maintain or improve the health, safety, and welfare of the
public when such uses occupy shoreline areas.
(c) Ensure activities and facilities are located on the shoreline in such a
manner as to retain or improve the quality of the environment.
(d) Ensure proposed shoreline uses do not infringe upon the rights of others,
upon the rights of private ownership, upon the rights of the public under
the Public Trust Doctrine of federal navigational servitude, and treaty
rights of Native American tribes.
(e) Minimize the adverse impacts of shoreline uses and activities on the
environment during all phases of development (e.g., design, construction,
management, and use).
(3) Shoreline Environment Designation Policies:
(a) Provide a comprehensive shoreline environment designation system to
categorize the City’s shoreline into environments based on the primary
characteristics of shoreline areas to guide the use and management of
these areas and to preserve wildlife habitat area, natural resources, and
public agency operations.
(b) Designate properties as Natural in order to protect and restore those
shoreline areas that are relatively free of human influence or that include
intact or minimally degraded shoreline functions that are sensitive to
potential impacts from human use.
(c) Designate properties Urban Conservancy to protect and restore ecological
functions of open space, floodplain, and other sensitive lands, while
accommodating low-intensity uses.
(d) Assign appropriate designations to accommodate recreational uses. Ensure
intense recreational uses, such as boat launches and parks, do not conflict
with the sensitive nature of the shoreline (e.g., habitat management units)
where low impact recreational uses are more appropriate.
Page 40 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 12
(e) Assign appropriate designation for flood protection areas maintained by
public agencies, while allowing low-intensity recreational uses such as
trail and viewpoints.
(f) Assign properties as High Intensity – Industrial to support industrial,
commercial, irrigation supply, transportation, and navigation activities
while maintaining the ecological functions.
(g) Assign properties as High Intensity – Mixed Use to support commercial,
residential, transportation, and navigation activities while maintaining the
ecological functions.
(h) Designate properties as Shoreline Residential to accommodate higher
density residential development and recognize existing and proposed land
uses. This designation is appropriate for residential uses on lands with
zoning classifications for detached and attached residences.
(4) Agriculture Policies:
(a) This SMP recognizes the importance of agriculture to the City’s economy
and also as it exists in the City limits and urban growth areas (UGAs).
Allow for ongoing agricultural activities, while also maintaining shoreline
ecological functions and processes.
(b) Conduct new agricultural development in a manner that ensures no net
loss of shoreline ecological functions and processes.
(c) Maintain a vegetative buffer between agricultural lands and waterbodies
or wetlands.
(d) Conversion of agricultural lands to other uses should comply with all
policies and regulations for non-agricultural uses.
(5) Boating Facilities Policies:
(a) Locate and design boating facilities so their structures and operations will
be compatible with the area affected such as environmental conditions,
shoreline configuration, access, and neighboring upland and aquatic uses.
(b) Require restoration activities when substantial improvements or repairs to
existing boating facilities areis planned.
(c) Boating facilities that minimize the amount of shoreline modification are
preferred.
(d) Boating facilities should provide physical and visual public shoreline
access and provide for multiple uses, including water-related use, to the
Page 41 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 13
extent compatible with shoreline ecological functions and processes and
adjacent shoreline use.
(e) Boating facilities should be located and designed to avoid adverse effects
on riverine and nearshore processes, such as erosion, littoral or riparian
transport, and accretion, and should, where feasible, enhance degraded,
scarce, and/or valuable shore features including accretion shoreforms.
(f) Location and design of boating facilities should not unduly obstruct
navigable waters and should avoid adverse effects to recreational
opportunities such as fishing, pleasure boating, swimming, beach walking,
picnicking, and shoreline viewing.
(6) Breakwaters, Jetties, Groins, and Weirs Policies:
(a) To the extent feasible, limit the use of breakwaters, jetties, groins, weirs,
or other similar structures to those projects providing ecological
restoration or other public benefits. These structures should avoid or
minimize significant ecological impacts. Impacts that cannot be avoided
should be mitigated.
(7) Dredging and Dredge Material Disposal Policies:
(a) Dredging and dredge material disposal should avoid and minimize
significant ecological impacts. Impacts that cannot be avoided should be
mitigated.
(b) Design and locate new shoreline development to minimize the need for
dredging.
(c) Limit dredging and dredge material disposal to the minimum necessary to
allow for shoreline restoration, flood hazard reduction, and maintenance of
existing legal moorage and navigation, and to support existing industrial
areas. Except for industrial development, dredging to provide for new
navigation uses is discouraged.
(d) Dredging to support industrial development and to maintain existing
transportation corridors is a necessary and critical component of shoreline
management.
(e) Ensure dredging operations are planned and conducted in a manner that
will minimize interference with navigation and lessen adverse impacts to
other shoreline uses.
(8) Fill Policies:
(a) Limit fill waterward of the OHWM to support ecological restoration or to
facilitate water-dependent or public access uses.
Page 42 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 14
(b) Allow fill consistent with floodplain regulations upland of the OHWM,
provided it is located, designed, and constructed to protect shoreline
ecological functions and ecosystem-wide processes, including channel
migration, and is the minimum necessary to implement an approved
project.
(9) In-stream Structures Policies:
(a) Locate, plan, and permit in-stream structures only when consistent with
the full range of public interests, ecological functions and processes, and
environmental concerns, with special emphasis on protecting and restoring
priority habitats and species.
(10) Mining Policies:
(a) Locate mining facilities outside shoreline jurisdiction whenever feasible.
(b) Do not allow mining in any location waterward of the OHWM.
(c) Design and locate mining facilities and associated activities to prevent loss
of ecological function. Give preference to mining uses that result in the
creation, restoration, or enhancement of habitat for priority species.
(d) Protect waterbodies from sources of pollution, including, but not limited
to, sedimentation and siltation, chemical and petrochemical use, and
spillage and storage/disposal of mining wastes and spoils.
(e) Mining operations should be located, designed, and managed so that other
appropriate uses are not subjected to substantial or unnecessary adverse
impacts from noise, dust, or other effects of the operation. The operator
may be required to implement measures, such as buffers, limited hours, or
other mitigating measures, for the purpose of minimizing adverse
proximity impacts.
(11) Pier and Dock Policies:
(a) Pier and dock provisions should be consistent with the USACE McNary
Pool Management Plan.
(b) Moorage associated with a single-family residence is considered a
water-dependent use provided that it is designed and used as a facility to
access watercraft, and other moorage facilities are not available or
feasible. Moorage for water-related and water-enjoyment uses or shared
moorage for multi-family use should be allowed as part of a mixed-use
development or where it provides public access.
(c) New moorage, excluding docks accessory to single-family residences,
should be permitted when the applicant/proponent has demonstrated that a
Page 43 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 15
specific need exists to support the intended water-dependent or public
access use.
(d) As an alternative to continued proliferation of individual private moorage,
mooring buoys are preferred over docks or floats. Shared moorage
facilities are preferred over single-user moorage where feasible, especially
where water-use conflicts exist or are predictable. New subdivisions of
more than two lots and new multi-family development of more than two
dwelling units should provide shared moorage where feasible.
(e) Docks, piers, and mooring buoys, including those accessory to
single-family residences, should avoid locations where they will adversely
impact shoreline ecological functions or processes, including high-velocity
currents and littoral drift.
(f) Moorage should be spaced and oriented in a manner that minimizes
hazards and obstructions to public navigation rights and corollary rights
thereto, such as, but not limited to, fishing, swimming, and pleasure
boating, and private riparian rights of adjacent land owners.
(g) Moorage should be restricted to the minimum size necessary to meet the
needs of the proposed use. The length, width, and height of piers and
docks should be no greater than that required for safety and practicality for
the primary use.
(h) Pile supports are preferred over fills because piles do not displace water
surface or aquatic habitat and are removable and thus are more flexible in
terms of long-term use patterns. Floats may be less desirable than pile
structures where aquatic habitat or littoral drift are significant.
(i) The use of buoys for small craft moorage is preferred over pile or float
structures because of less long-term impact on shore features and users;
moorage buoys should be placed as close to shore as possible to minimize
obstruction to navigation.
(j) Piers and docks should be constructed of materials that will not adversely
affect water quality or aquatic plants and animals in the long term.
(k) New pier and dock development should be designed so as not to interfere
with lawful public access to or use of shorelines. Developers of new piers
and shared moorage should be encouraged to provide physical or visual
public access to shorelines whenever safe and compatible with the primary
use and shore features.
(12) Recreational Development Policies:
(a) Shoreline recreational development should be given priority for shoreline
location to the extent that the use facilitates the public’s ability to reach,
Page 44 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 16
touch, and enjoy the water's edge, to travel on the waters of the state, and
to view the water and the shoreline. Where appropriate, such facilities
should be dispersed along the shoreline in a manner that supports more
frequent recreational access and aesthetic enjoyment of the shoreline for a
substantial number of people.
(b) Recreational developments should facilitate appropriate use of shoreline
resources while conserving them. These resources include, but are not
limited to, cultural resources, accretion shoreforms, wetlands, soils,
groundwater, surface water, native plant and animal life, and shore
processes.
(c) Recreational facilities should be a combination of active and passive
types. Location of such facilities should consider the ecological function
and sensitive nature of the shoreline in order to avoid adverse impacts. For
example, wildlife and habitat preservation areas with sensitive shoreline
habitat should have low-impact recreational uses.
(d) Recreational developments and plans should provide the regional
population with a varied and balanced choice of recreation experiences in
appropriate locations. Public agencies should coordinate their plans and
activities to provide a wide variety of recreational opportunities without
needlessly duplicating facilities.
(e) Recreational development should encourage the linkage of shoreline
parks, recreation areas, and public access points with linear systems such
as hiking paths, bicycle paths, easements, and scenic drives.
(f) When feasible, recreation facilities should incorporate public education
regarding shoreline ecological functions and processes, the role of human
actions on the environment, and the importance of public involvement in
shoreline management. Opportunities incorporating educational and
interpretive information should be pursued in design and operation of
recreation facilities and nature trails.
(g) Recreational development should be located and designed to preserve,
enhance, or create scenic views and vistas.
(13) Residential Development Policies:
(a) Consider single-family residential development as a priority use.
(b) Locate and construct residential development in a manner that ensures no
net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
(c) Ensure the overall density of development, lot coverage, and height of
structures is appropriate to the physical capabilities of the site and
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 45 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 17
(d) Ensure new residential development provides adequate buffers or
open space from the water to protect ecological functions and
ecosystem-wide processes, preserve views, preserve shoreline aesthetic
characteristics, protect the privacy of nearby residences, and minimize use
conflicts.
(e) Make adequate provisions for services and infrastructure necessary to
support residential development.
(f) Design and locate residential development to preserve existing shoreline
vegetation, control erosion, and protect water quality.
(g) Design and locate new residences so shoreline stabilization will not be
necessary to protect the structure. The creation of new residential lots
should demonstrate the lots can be developed without:
(i) Constructing shoreline stabilization structures (such as
bulkheads);;.
(ii) Causing significant erosion or slope instability; and.; and
(iii) Removing existing native vegetation within shoreline buffers;.and
(iii)(iv) Disturbing cultural resources.
(14) Shoreline Habitat and Natural Systems Enhancement Projects Policies:
(a) Include provisions for shoreline vegetation restoration or enhancement,
fish and wildlife habitat enhancement, and low-impact development
techniques in projects located within shoreline jurisdiction, where feasible.
(b) Encourage and facilitate implementation of projects and programs
included in the SMP Shoreline Restoration Plan.
(15) Shoreline Stabilization Policies:
(a) Locate and design new development, including subdivisions, to eliminate
the need for new shoreline modification or stabilization.
(b) Design, locate, size, and construct new or replacement structural shoreline
stabilization measures to minimize and mitigate the impact of these
modifications on the City’s shorelines.
(c) Give preference to non-structural shoreline stabilization measures over
structural shoreline stabilization, andstabilization and give preference to
soft structural shoreline stabilization over hard structural shoreline
stabilization.
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 46 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 18
(d) Allow location, design, and construction of riprap and other bank
stabilization measures primarily to prevent damage to existing
development or to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the City’s
residents.
(e) Encourage fish-friendly shoreline design during new construction and
redevelopment by offering incentives and regulatory flexibility.
(16) Utilities Policies:
(a) Allow for utility maintenance and extension with criteria for location and
vegetation restoration as appropriate.
(b) Plan, design, and locate utility facilities to minimize harm to shoreline
functions, preserve the natural landscape, and minimize conflicts with
present and future planned land and shoreline uses, while meeting the
needs of future populations in areas planned to accommodate growth.
(c) Do not permit new non-water-oriented primary utility production and
processing facilities or parts of those facilities, such as power plants,
solid waste storage, or disposal facilities, within shoreline jurisdiction
unless no other options are feasible. Primary utility facilities, such as
wastewater treatment plants, and expansion of existing facilities should be
located in shoreline jurisdiction only if no practical upland alternative or
location exists. Such facilities and expansions should be designed and
located to minimize impacts on shoreline ecological functions, including
riparian and aquatic areas, and to the natural landscape and aesthetics.
Public health and safety should be the highest priority for the planning,
development, and operation of primary utility facilities.
(d) Locate utility transmission facilities for the conveyance of services, such
as power lines, cables, and pipelines, outside of shoreline jurisdiction
where feasible. Where permitted within shoreline jurisdiction, such
facilities should be located within existing or approved road crossings,
rights-of-way, and corridors or in such a way as to minimize potential
adverse impacts on shoreline areas. Joint use of rights-of-way and
corridors in shoreline areas should be encouraged.
(e) Locate new utility facilities so as not to require extensive shoreline
protection works.
(f) Locate utility facilities and corridors to protect scenic views from public
parks and trails. Whenever possible, such facilities should be placed
underground or alongside or under bridges.
(g) Design utility facilities and rights-of-way to preserve the natural landscape
and to minimize conflicts with present and planned land uses.
Page 47 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 19
(17) Existing Uses Policies:
(a) Allow nonconforming, existing legal uses and structures to continue in
accordance with this SMP. Residential structures and appurtenant
structures that were legally established and are used for a conforming use
(but do not meet standards for setbacks, buffers, or yards), area, bulk,
height, or density, should be considered a conforming structure.
(b) Allow alterations of nonconforming structures, uses, and lots in
consideration of historic development patterns when occupied by preferred
uses and consistent with public safety and other public purposes.
(c) Encourage transitions from nonconforming uses to conforming uses.
(d) Allow for nonconforming structures to expand when they do not increase
the nonconformity according to SMP requirements.
(e) Allow for existing roads, driveways, and utility lines to continue and
expand when they do not increase the nonconformity according to SMP
requirements.
(f) Consider the no net loss of ecological function objective to guide review
of proposed expansions or other changes to nonconforming uses and new
development on nonconforming vacant lots. This objective may be
addressed in an area-wide manner consistent with the SMP cumulative
impacts analysis.
4.5 Conservation Element
(Goals and policies for Environmental Protection, Critical Areas, and Shoreline Vegetation
Conservation, and Water Quality, Stormwater Management, and Nonpoint Pollution)
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Protect the existing hydraulic, hydrologic, and habitat functions,
as well as scenic and recreational values, of City’s shorelines and the
McNary Pool.
(2) General Policies:
(a) Develop and implement management practices that will ensure a sustained
yield of renewable resources of the shorelines while preserving,
protecting, enhancing, and restoring unique and non-renewable shoreline
resources, environments, or features.
(b) To the greatest extent feasible, reclaim and restore areas that are
biologically and aesthetically degraded while maintaining appropriate use
of the shoreline.
Page 48 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 20
(c) Preserve scenic vistas, aesthetics, fisheries and wildlife habitat, and other
critical areas.
(d) Protect shoreline processes and ecological functions through regulatory
and non-regulatory means that may include acquisition of key properties,
conservation easements, regulation of development within shoreline
jurisdiction, and incentives to private property owners to encourage
ecologically sound design and implementation of best land management
practices.
(e) Protect and manage shoreline-associated wetlands, including maintenance
of sufficient volumes of surface and subsurface drainage into wetlands, to
sustain existing vegetation and wildlife habitat.
(f) Work with other jurisdictional agencies in the region and with the private
sector to deal effectively with regional and watershed-wide natural
environment issues and the protection, preservation, and enhancement of
all shoreline areas as fish and wildlife habitat.
(g) Manage development to avoid risk and damage to property and loss of life
from geological conditions.
(h) Regulate development within the SMP area of the 100-year floodplain to
avoid risk and damage to property and loss of life.
(i) Prohibit the introduction of invasive plant species along the shoreline,
andshorelines and encourage the removal of noxious and invasive weeds
and trees.
(j) Protect, enhance, and maintain healthy vegetation consistent with the local
climate and nature of shoreline.
(3) Critical Areas:
(a) Goals:
(i) Goal A: Promote public health and welfare by instituting local
measures to preserve naturally occurring wetlands, critical aquifer
recharge areas, geologically hazardous areas, frequently flooded
areas (also see SMP Section I – 4.7: Flood Hazard Management
goals and policies), and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas
that exist in the City’s shoreline jurisdiction for their associated
value.
(ii) Goal B: Reduce the threat posed to the health and safety of citizens
from commercial, residential, or industrial development that may
be sited in areas of significant geologic hazard.
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 49 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 21
(iii) Goal C: Identify categories of fish and wildlife habitat
conservation areas in the City’s shoreline jurisdiction, based in part
on information supplied by Washington State Department of Fish
and Wildlife’s (WDFW’s) Priority Habitat and Species Program
and other sources.
(iv) Goal D: Protect local wildlife values and reflect the needs and
desires of the public.
(b) Policies:
(i) Recognize that critical areas may serve a variety of vital functions,
including, but not limited to, flood storage and conveyance, water
quality protection, recharge and discharge areas for groundwater,
erosion control, sediment control, fish and wildlife habitat,
recreation, education, and scientific research.
(ii) Implement protection measures that strive to spare identified value
and function of critical areas that may be in jeopardy from new
development proposals. However, these regulations shall not
prohibit uses legally existing on any parcel prior to their adoption.
(iii) Avoid unnecessary duplication with various legal means and levels
of government that already address protection of wetlands, and
promote cooperation and coordination whenever possible.
(iv) Recognize that risks from geologic hazards can be reduced or
mitigated to acceptable levels through engineering design or
modified construction practices. In other cases where technological
efforts are not sufficient to reduce associated risks, building is best
avoided. Cooperate with federal, state, and private agencies and
individuals who have primary authority to manage specific fish
and wildlife habitat conservation areas within certain parts of the
City.
(v) Encourage preservation of adequate size blocks of land necessary
for species survival and corridor areas that allow for migratory
travel.
(vi) Recognize that species of wildlife in the City’s locality are in a
state of continuing flux, and a prudent understanding of this
phenomenon is vital in guiding decision makers to balance
conservation of wildlife species with promotion of wise, desirable
growth.
4.6 Historic, Cultural, Scientific, and Educational Resources Element
(1) Goals:
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 50 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 22
(a) Goal A: Identify, preserve, and protect historical, cultural, and
archaeological resources found to be significant by recognized local, state,
or federal processes in compliance with State and Federal laws.
(b) Goal B: Encourage educational and scientific projects and programs that
foster a greater appreciation for the importance of shoreline management,
water-oriented activities, environmental conservation, and local historic
connections with the City’s shoreline.
(2) Policies:
(a) Identify, protect, preserve, and restore important archeological, historic,
and cultural sites located in shoreline areas.
(b) Encourage educational projects and programs that foster a greater
appreciation of the importance of shoreline management, maritime
activities, environmental conservation, and maritime history, consistent
with protecting no net loss of ecological functions.
(c) Prevent public or private uses and activities from damaging, altering,
removing, or destroying any site having historic, cultural, scientific, or
educational value without appropriate analysis and mitigation.
4.7 Flood Hazard Management Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Protect public safety within river floodways and floodplains while
recognizing that water levels in Columbia and Snake rivers are generally
stable as part of the McNary Pool. Protect natural systems by preserving
the flood storage function of floodplains.
(b) Goal B: Diminish potential hazards that may be caused by inappropriate
development in areas where severe and costly flooding is anticipated to
occur.
(2) Policies:
(a) Manage development proposed within floodplains and floodways
consistent with the SMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) standards, and Critical Area Regulations for frequently flooded
areas contained within this SMP.
(b) Implement protection measures designed to minimize hazards in
frequently flooded areas that already exist as detailed in
Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) 24.20, Provisions for Flood Hazard
Protection.
Page 51 of 412
June 2015FebruaryDecember 20232
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program – Section I Draft
Anchor QEA/Oneza & AssociatesWhite Bluffs Consulting 23
(c) Work with Franklin County and state and federal agencies to deal
effectively with regional flooding issues.
(d) Control stormwater runoff in a manner consistent with low-impact
development practices, which utilize natural detention, retention, and
recharge techniques.
(e) Prohibit any development within the floodplain that would individually or
cumulatively cause any increase in the base flood elevation beyond FEMA
standards.
4.8 Private Property Right
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Recognize and protect private property rights in shoreline uses
and developments consistent with the public interest.
(2) Policies:
(a) Shoreline uses should be located and designed to respect private property
rights, maintain privacy of private property, be compatible with the
shoreline environment, protect ecological functions and processes, and
protect aesthetic values of the shoreline.
(b) Public access to shoreline, such as trails, bikeways, or roads, should
consider the privacy of private property owners when locating them near
private properties.
Page 52 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 1
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING PASCO MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 29 SHORELINE
REGULATIONS RELATED TO THE UPDATED SHORELINE MASTER
PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, The Shoreline Management Act (SMA) is the foundation for shoreline
management in Washington State; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Shoreline Management Act is to manage the shoreline to
accommodate all reasonable and appropriate uses consistent with protecting against adverse effects to
the public health, the land and its vegetation and wildlife; and
WHEREAS, the SMA requires each town, city, and county to review, and, if necessary, revise
its Shoreline Master Program (SMP) every eight years per Revised Code of Washington (RCW)
90.58.80; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) Shoreline Master Program is a planning document that
outlines the City's shoreline goals and establishes regulations for development to ensure that all land
use, development, or other activity occurring within the designated shoreline jurisdiction is appropriate
for that area, and
WHEREAS, the City is required to complete an update of the existing Shoreline Master
Program (SMP) that is consistent with procedural and substantive requirements of the Shoreline Master
Program Act (SMA) governed by RCW 90.58 and WAC 173-26; and
WHEREAS, the City last updated their SMP in 2015; and
WHEREAS, City entered into a grant contract with the Washington State Department of
Ecology effective May 10, 2022 to update and amend its Shoreline Master Program consistent with
the Shoreline Management Act and Shoreline Master Program Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City is completing the periodic review process to review and revise its SMP
on or before June 30, 2023, in coordination with the Washington State Department of Ecology
(Ecology); and
WHEREAS, the periodic review addresses recent changes in SMA requirements, changes for
consistency with revised comprehensive plans and regulations, and any other changes deemed
necessary to reflect changed circumstances, new information, or improved data; and
WHEREAS, The proposed changes were made available to public agencies, NPOs, tribes, and
the general public via direct email, City of Pasco web posts, Ecology website posting, and public notice
during a 60-day comment period held between February 24th and April 25th 2023; and
WHEREAS, comments have been indexed and addressed by staff and consultant as part of the
SMP update process; and
Page 53 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 2
WHEREAS, on March 22, 2023 a Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendments 30-day comment
period and Joint Public Hearing notice and SEPA Checklist were sent to the agencies for review (March
26, 2023 to April 25, 2023); and
WHEREAS, on April 20th 2023 the Planning Commission held a Joint Public Hearing with
the Washington State Department of Ecology to accept public testimony on the proposed Shoreline
Master Program Update, and that meeting was duly recorded; and
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2023 the Planning Commission held a Public Meeting to recommend
the Shoreline Master Program report and ancillary documents be sent on to the Washington State
Department of Ecology for preliminary review, and that meeting was duly recorded; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend to the City
Council approval of the Shoreline Master Plan Update; and
WHEREAS, The Update provides a document that outlines the City's amended shoreline goals
and regulations for development now and in the future; and
WHEREAS, The Update achieves the goals and requirements of the Shoreline Management
Act (RCW 90.58); and
WHEREAS, the proposal was reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act and a
Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposed Shoreline Master Program Update on
June 19, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Ecology approved the City of Pasco
Shoreline Master Program update without comment on June XX 2023; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council held a public meeting on the proposed Update on July
17, 2023, at its regularly scheduled Council meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council accepted the recommendation of the City of Pasco
Planning Commission at its public meeting on July 17, 2023; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Shoreline Master Program Update is hereby amended as shown in
Exhibit “A” as a Shoreline Planning guide and supplement to the Comprehensive Plan;
Page 54 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 3
Section 2. That PMC Title 29 - Shoreline Regulations, is hereby amended and shall
read as follows:
Title 29
SHORELINE REGULATIONS
Chapters:
29.05 Authority and Purpose
29.10 Environment Designation
29.15 General Regulations
29.20 Shoreline Modifications and Use Regulations
29.25 Critical Areas
29.30 Existing Uses, Structures, and Lots
29.35 Administration and Enforcement
Chapter 29.05
AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE
Sections:
29.05.010 Authority.
29.05.020 Applicability.
29.05.030 Purpose.
29.05.040 Relationship to other codes, ordinances, and plans.
29.05.050 Liberal construction.
29.05.060 Effective date.
29.05.070 Definitions.
29.05.010 Authority.
(1) The Shoreline Management Act (SMA) of 1971, Chapter 90.58 RCW, is the authority for the
enactment and administration of this Shoreline Master Program (SMP).
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.010.]
29.05.020 Applicability.
(1) This SMP applies to all development, the construction or exterior alteration of structures;
dredging; drilling; dumping; filling; removal of any sand, gravel, minerals or vegetation;
bulkheading; driving of piling; placing of obstructions; or any project of a permanent or temporary
nature which interferes with the normal public use of the surface of the waters of the state subject
to Chapter 90.58 RCW at any stage of water level. Development does not include the following
activities:
(a) Interior building improvements;
(b) Exterior structure maintenance activities, including painting and roofing, as long as it does
not expand the existing footprint of the structure;
(c) Routine landscape maintenance of established, ornamental landscaping, such as lawn
mowing, pruning and weeding;
(d) Maintenance of the following existing facilities that does not expand the affected area:
septic tanks (routine cleaning), wells, and individual utility service connections;
Page 55 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 4
(e) Dismantling or removing structures if there is no other associated development or
redevelopment;
(f) Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any person conducting a remedial action at a facility pursuant
to a consent decree, order, or agreed order issued pursuant to RCW 70.305, or to Ecology when
it conducts a remedial action under RCW 70.305;
(g) Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any person installing site improvements for storm water
treatment in an existing boatyard facility to meet requirements of a national pollutant discharge
elimination system storm water general permit;
(h) Washington State Department of Transportation projects and activities meeting the
conditions of RCW 90.58.356;
(i) Projects consistent with an environmental excellence program agreement pursuant to RCW
90.58.045 and RCW 43.21K; The SMA of 1971, RCW 90.58, is the authority for the enactment
and administration of this SMP.
(j) Projects authorized through the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council process, pursuant
to RCW 80.50; and
(k) Areas and uses in those areas that are under exclusive federal jurisdiction as established
through federal or state statutes are not subject to the jurisdiction of RCW 90.58
(2) (1) This SMP shall apply to all of the shoreline areas, waters, and critical areas within the
shoreline jurisdiction of the City as described in SMP Section I, Shoreline Goals and Policies,
Profile of the Shoreline Jurisdiction, within the City limits of the City of Pasco.
(3) (2) All proposed uses, activities, or development occurring within shoreline jurisdiction must
conform to the intent and requirements of Chapter 90.58 RCW, the SMA, and this SMP whether
or not a permit or other form of authorization is required. See SMP Shoreline Goals and Policies
section for the shoreline jurisdiction description and Chapter 29.35 PMC for the definition of uses,
activities, and development.
(4) (3) The SMP applies to shoreline jurisdiction within the City limits; this SMP will not apply
to shorelines in the urban growth areas (UGAs) until the annexation of the UGA to the City is
finalized.
(5 (4) Pursuant to WAC 173-27-060, federal agency activities may be required by other federal
laws to meet the permitting requirements of Chapter 90.58 RCW. This SMP shall apply to all
nonfederal developments and uses undertaken on federal lands and on lands subject to nonfederal
ownership, lease, or easement, even though such lands may fall within the external boundaries of
federal ownership.
(6) (5) As recognized by RCW 90.58.350, the provisions of this SMP shall not affect treaty rights
of Native American tribes.
(7) (6) Maps indicating the extent of shoreline jurisdiction and shoreline designations are guidance
only. They are to be used in conjunction with the most current scientific and technical information
available, field investigations, and on-site surveys to accurately establish the location and extent
of shoreline jurisdiction when a project is proposed. All areas meeting the definition of a shoreline
of the state or a Shoreline of Statewide Significance, whether mapped or not, are subject to the
provisions of this SMP.
Page 56 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 5
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.020.]
29.05.030 Purpose.
The purposes of this SMP are:
(1) To promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the City by providing
comprehensive policies and effective, reasonable regulations for development, use, and protection
of jurisdictional shorelines;
(2) To further assume and carry out the local government responsibilities established by the SMA
in RCW 90.58.050, including planning and administering the regulatory program consistent with
the policy and provisions of the SMA in RCW 90.58.020;
(3) To provide a high quality shoreline environment where:
(a) Recreational opportunities are abundant;
(b) The public enjoys access to and views of shoreline areas;
(c) Natural systems are preserved, restored, or enhanced;
(d) Ecological functions of the shoreline are maintained and improved over time;
(e) Water-oriented uses are promoted consistent with the shoreline character and
environmental functions; and
(4) To apply special conditions to those uses that are not consistent with the control of pollution
and prevention of damage to the natural environment, or that are not unique to or dependent on
use of the state’s shoreline; and
(5) To ensure no net loss of ecological functions associated with the shoreline.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.030.]
29.05.040 Relationship to other codes, ordinances, and plans.
(1) All applicable federal, state, and local laws shall apply to properties in the shoreline
jurisdiction. Where this SMP makes reference to any RCW, WAC, or other state or federal law or
regulation, the most recent amendment or current edition shall apply.
(2) In the event provisions of this SMP conflict with provisions of federal, state, or city
regulations, the provision that is most protective of shoreline resources shall prevail. It is
understood that the provisions of this SMP may not allow development to occur at what otherwise
might be the property’s full zoning potential.
(a) Local plans or programs include, but are not limited to:
(i) Chapter 24.20 PMC, Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection;
Page 57 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 6
(ii) PMC Title 23, Environmental Impact;
(iii) PMC Title 25, Zoning.
(b) State and federal programs include, but are not limited to:
(i) Washington State Hydraulic Project Permits (HPA);
(ii) Washington State Pesticide Applicator License Requirements;
(iii) Washington State Waste Discharge Permits;
(iv) Washington State Water Quality Certification Requirements (401);
(v) USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers) 404 Permits and Section 10 Permits.
(3) The policies in the SMP, contained in the SMP elements, state those underlying objectives
that the regulations are intended to accomplish. The policies guide the interpretation and
enforcement of the SMP regulations contained in this title. The policies are not regulations in
themselves and, therefore, do not impose requirements beyond those set forth in the regulations.
(4) This SMP contains critical area regulations in Chapter 29.25 PMC, applicable only in
shoreline jurisdictions that provide a level of protection to critical areas assuring no net loss of
shoreline ecological functions necessary to sustain shoreline natural resources (RCW 36.70A.480).
In the event of a conflict between the requirements of this title and any other code or ordinance of
the City, the regulation that provides the greater protection for the particular critical area within
shoreline jurisdiction shall apply.
(5) Projects in the shoreline jurisdiction that have either been deemed technically complete
through the application process or have been approved through local and state reviews prior to the
adoption of this SMP are considered accepted. Major changes or new phases of projects that were
not included in the originally approved plan will be subject to the policies and regulations of this
SMP.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.040.]
29.05.050 Liberal construction.
(1) According to RCW 90.58.900, SMA is exempted from the rule of strict construction, and it
shall be liberally construed to give full effect to the objectives and purposes for which it was
enacted. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.050.]
29.05.060 Effective date.
(1) The SMP is hereby adopted on September 19, 2016 July 31, 2023. This SMP and all
amendments thereto shall become effective 14 days after final approval and adoption by the
Department of Ecology. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.070.]
29.05.070 Definitions.
“Act” means the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA), Chapter 90.58 RCW.
“Active fault” means a fault that is considered likely to undergo renewed movement within a
period of concern to humans. Faults are commonly considered to be active if the fault has moved
one or more times in the last 10,000 years.
Page 58 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 7
“Additions” means improvements to an existing building or structure, the cost of which does not
exceed 50 percent of the assessed value of the total structure or result in an increase greater than
25 percent of the building footprint (up to a maximum of 500 square feet) before the addition is
started. Additions must share a common wall (one full side) with the original structure.
“Adjacent,” for purposes of applying Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas, means immediately
adjoining (in contact with the boundary of the influence area) or within a distance less than that
needed to separate activities from critical areas to ensure protection of the functions and values of
the critical areas. Adjacent shall mean any activity or development located:
(a) On site immediately adjoining a critical area; or
(b) A distance equal to or less than the required critical area buffer width and building setback.
“Agricultural activities” means agricultural uses and practices, including but not limited to:
producing, breeding, or increasing agricultural products; rotating and changing agricultural crops;
allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie fallow, in which it is plowed and tilled but left
unseeded; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant as a result of adverse
agricultural market conditions; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant because
the land is enrolled in a local, state, or federal conservation program, or the land is subject to a
conservation easement; conducting agricultural operations; maintaining, repairing, and replacing
agricultural equipment; maintaining, repairing, and replacing agricultural facilities; provided, that
the replacement facility is no closer to the shoreline than the original facility; and maintaining
agricultural lands under production or cultivation. Also see definition of “New agricultural
activities” below.
“Agricultural equipment” includes, but is not limited to, the following used in agricultural
operations:
(a) Equipment; machinery; constructed shelters, buildings, and ponds; fences; upland finfish
rearing facilities; water diversion, withdrawal, conveyance, and use equipment and facilities
including, but not limited to, pumps, pipes, taps, canals, ditches, and drains;
(b) Corridors and facilities for transporting personnel, livestock, and equipment to, from, and
within agricultural lands;
(c) Farm residences and associated equipment, lands, and facilities; and
(d) Roadside stands and on-farm markets for marketing fruit or vegetables.
Agricultural facilities. See “Agricultural equipment.”
“Agricultural land” means those specific land areas on which agriculture activities are conducted
as of the date of adoption of a local Shoreline Master Program (SMP) pursuant to these guidelines
Page 59 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 8
as evidenced by aerial photography or other documentation. After the effective date of the SMP,
land converted to agricultural use is subject to compliance with the requirements of the SMP.
“Agricultural products” includes but is not limited to horticultural, viticultural, floricultural, and
vegetable, fruit, berry, grain, hops, hay, straw, turf, sod, seed, and apiary products; feed or forage
for livestock; Christmas trees; hybrid cottonwood and similar hardwood trees grown as crops and
harvested within 20 years of planting; and livestock, including both the animals themselves and
animal products, including but not limited to meat, upland finfish, poultry and poultry products,
and dairy products.
“Alteration,” for purposes of applying Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas, means any human-
induced change in an existing condition of a critical area or its buffer. Alterations include grading,
filling, dredging, channelizing, clearing (vegetation), applying pesticides, discharging waste,
construction, compaction, excavation, modifying for storm water management, relocating, or other
activities that change the existing landform, vegetation, hydrology, wildlife, or habitat value of
critical areas.
“Amendment” means a revision, update, addition, deletion, and/or reenactment to an existing
SMP.
“Applicant” means a person who files an application for a permit under this SMP and who is either
the owner of the land on which that proposed activity would be located, a contract purchaser, or
the authorized agent of such person.
“Approval” means an official action by a local government legislative body agreeing to submit a
proposed SMP or amendments to Washington State Department of Ecology for review and official
action pursuant to this SMP or an official action by Washington State Department of Ecology to
make a local government SMP effective, thereby incorporating the approved SMP or amendment
into the SMP.
“Aquaculture” means the culture or farming of fish or other aquatic plants and animals.
“Aquifer recharge area” means an area through which precipitation and surface water infiltrate the
soil and are transmitted through rocks and soil to create groundwater storage. They are also areas
where an aquifer that is a source of drinking water is vulnerable to contamination that would affect
the potability of water.
“Area of influence” encompasses an area that is two and one-half times the height of a slope. The
area of influence applies to areas that have geologically hazardous attributes consistent with an
“erosion” or “landslide hazard area” as defined in this section, and PMC 29.25.070, Geological
hazard areas. This mapped area surrounds the hazard area from all points for a distance of two and
one-half times the height of the applicable slope. An area with a 15 percent slope or greater as its
only attribute does not have an area of influence.
“Area of shallow flooding” means a designated AO or AH zone on the Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM). AO is characterized as sheet flow and AH indicates ponding. The base flood depths range
Page 60 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 9
from one to three feet; a clearly defined channel does not exist; the path of flooding is unpredictable
and indeterminate; and velocity flow may be evident.
“Area of special flood hazard” means the land in the floodplain within a community subject to a
one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. Designation on maps always includes
the letters A or V.
“Assessed value” means assessed valuation shall be as established by the County assessor’s office,
unless otherwise provided by a market appraisal institute appraisal.
“Associated wetlands” are those wetlands that are in proximity to and either influence or are
influenced by a stream subject to the SMA.
“Average grade level” means the average of the natural or existing topography of the portion of
the lot, parcel, or tract of real property that will be directly under the proposed building or structure.
In the case of structures to be built over water, average grade level shall be the elevation of the
ordinary high water mark (OHWM). Calculation of the average grade level shall be made by
averaging the ground elevations at the midpoint of all exterior walls of the proposed building or
structure.
“Base flood” means a flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given
year. Also referred to as the “100-year flood.” Designated on FIRM with the letters A or V.
“Base flood elevation” means the water surface elevation of the base flood. It shall be referenced
to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988.
“Basement” means any area of a building having its floor subgrade (below ground level) on all
sides.
“Best management practices (BMPs)” means conservation practices or systems of practice and
management measures that:
(a) Control soil loss and reduce water quality degradation caused by high concentrations of
nutrients, animal waste, toxics, and sediment;
(b) Minimize adverse impacts on surface water and groundwater flow and circulation
patterns, and the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of wetlands;
(c) Protect trees and vegetation designated to be retained during and following site
construction; and
(d) Provide standards for proper use of chemical herbicides within critical areas.
“Best management practices, agricultural” means systems of practices, schedules of activities,
prohibitions, maintenance procedures, and management measures that prevent or minimize
adverse impacts to the environment. Such practices may be subject to varying conditions, which
Page 61 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 10
include geographical location, weather, soil or mineral types and conditions, type of crop or
livestock, type of mining, and management systems. Generally accepted agricultural BMPs
include those practices historically carried out in the region and those practices defined by the
State of Washington, Department of Agriculture, recommendations by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, and other professional and industry agricultural organizations.
“Boating facilities” allowed in the City include boat launches and upland boat storage, marinas,
and other boat moorage structures or uses. For the purposes of this SMP, boating facilities excludes
docks serving four or fewer single-family residences.
“Breakwater” means an offshore structure whose primary purpose is to protect harbors, moorages,
and navigation activity from wave and wind action by creating stillwater areas along shore. A
secondary purpose is to protect shorelines from wave-caused erosion. Breakwaters are generally
built parallel to shore, may or may not be connected to land, and may be floating or stationary.
“Buffer, critical areas,” means an area which provides the margin of safety through protection of
slope stability, attenuation of surface water flows and landslide hazards reasonably necessary to
minimize risk to the public from loss of life or well-being or property damage resulting from
natural disasters, or an area which is an integral part of a stream or wetland ecosystem and which
provides shading, input of organic debris and coarse sediments, room for variation in stream or
wetland boundaries, habitat for wildlife and protection from harmful intrusion necessary to protect
the public from losses suffered when the functions and values of aquatic resources are degraded.
“Building setback line” means a line beyond which the foundation of a structure shall not extend.
“City” means the City of Pasco.
“Clearing” means the cutting, killing, grubbing, or removing of vegetation or other organic
material by physical, mechanical, chemical, or any other similar means.
“Cluster” means a group of three or more significant trees with overlapping or touching crowns.
“Community access” means a shoreline access available to a group or community (e.g.,
homeowners association), which may not be accessible to general public.
“Compensation project” means actions specifically designed to replace project induced critical
area and buffer losses. Compensation project design elements may include land acquisition,
planning, construction plans, monitoring, and contingency actions.
“Compensatory mitigation” means types of mitigation used to replace project-induced critical
areas and buffer losses or impacts.
“Critical aquifer recharge area” means those areas that are:
(a) Designated as wellhead protection areas pursuant to the WAC 246-290-135(4) and the
groundwater contribution area in WAC 246-291-100(2)(e). Wellhead protection areas shall,
for the purpose of this regulation, include the identified recharge areas associated with either
Page 62 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 11
Group A public water supply wells and those Group B wells with a wellhead protection plan
filed with the Franklin County Health District; and
(b) Identified in the Soil Survey of Pasco as having high potential for aquifer recharge,
including those soil types identified by the Shoreline Administrator.
“Crown” means the area of a tree containing leaf- or needle-bearing branches.
“Cultural and historic resources” means buildings, sites and areas having archaeological, historic,
cultural, or scientific value or significance.
“Designated floodway” means the regulatory floodway that has been delineated on the City’s
FIRM.
“Developable area” means a site or portion of a site that may be utilized as the location of
development, in accordance with the rules of this SMP.
“Development” means a use consisting of: the construction or exterior alteration of structures;
dredging; drilling; dumping; filling; removal of any sand, gravel, or minerals; bulkheading; driving
of piling; placing of obstructions; or any project of a permanent or temporary nature, which
interferes with the normal public use of the surface of the waters overlying lands subject to the
SMA at any stage of water level. “Development” does not include dismantling or removing
structures if there is no other associated development or re-development.
“Development permit” means any permit issued by the City or other authorized agency for
construction, land use, or the alteration of land.
“Dock” means, as a general term, a structure or group of structures that provides boat moorage or
other uses. A dock may be made up of piers (which are structures on fixed piles) and floats (which
float on the water’s surface and are typically attached to piles so that they may rise and fall with
changes in the water’s elevation).
“Dredging” means the removal of sediments from the bed of a water body by mechanical means.
“Ecological functions” or “shoreline functions” means the work performed or role played by the
physical, chemical, and biological processes that contribute to the maintenance of the aquatic and
terrestrial environments that constitute the shoreline’s natural ecosystem.
“Ecosystem-wide processes” means the suite of naturally occurring physical and geologic
processes of erosion, transport, and deposition, and specific chemical processes that shape
landforms within a specific shoreline ecosystem and determine the types of habitat and the
associated ecological functions.
“Erosion” means the detachment and movement of soil or rock by water, wind, ice, or gravity.
Page 63 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 12
“Erosion hazard area” means those areas that, because of natural characteristics, including
vegetative cover, soil texture, slope gradient, rainfall patterns, or human-induced changes to such
characteristics, are vulnerable to erosion.
“Feasible” means, for the purpose of this SMP, that an action, such as a development project,
mitigation, or preservation requirement, meets all of the following conditions:
(a) the action can be accomplished with technologies and methods that have been used in the
past in similar circumstances, or studies or tests have demonstrated in similar circumstances
that such approaches are currently available and likely to achieve the intended results;
(b) the action provides a reasonable likelihood of achieving its intended purpose; and
(c) the action does not physically preclude achieving the project’s primary intended legal use.
In cases where these guidelines require certain actions unless they are infeasible, the burden of
proving infeasibility is on the applicant. In determining an action’s infeasibility, the reviewing
agency may weigh the action’s relative public costs and public benefits, considered in the
short- and long-term time frames.
“Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)” means the agency that oversees the
administration of the National Flood Insurance Program (44 CFR).
“Fill” means the addition of soil, sand, rock, gravel, sediment, earth retaining structure, or other
material to an area waterward of the OHWM, in wetlands or on shoreline areas in a manner that
raises the elevation or creates dry land.
“Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas” means areas necessary for maintaining species in
suitable habitats within their natural geographic distribution so that isolated subpopulations are not
created as designated by WAC 365-190-080(5). These areas include:
(a) Areas within which state and federal endangered and threatened species exist, or state
sensitive, candidate, and monitor species have a primary association;
(b) Priority habitat and species areas identified by the Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife (WDFW);
(c) Habitats and species of local importance that have been designated by the City at the time
of application;
(d) Naturally occurring ponds less than 20 acres and their submerged aquatic beds that
provide fish or wildlife habitat. These do not include ponds deliberately designed and created
from dry sites such as canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds,
temporary construction ponds of less than three years’ duration, and landscape amenities.
Naturally occurring ponds may include those artificial ponds intentionally created from dry
areas in order to mitigate conversion of ponds, if permitted by a regulatory authority;
(e) Waters of the state as defined by Chapter 222-16 WAC;
Page 64 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 13
(f) Lakes, ponds, streams, and rivers planted with game fish by a governmental or tribal entity;
(g) Areas with which anadromous fish species have a primary association; and
(h) State natural area preserves and natural resources conservation areas.
“Flood” or “flooding” mean a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation
of normally dry land areas from the overflow of inland waters and/or the unusual and rapid
accumulation of runoff or surface waters from any source.
“Flood hazard area” means any area subject to inundation by the base flood or risk from channel
migration, including, but not limited to, an aquatic area, wetland, or closed depression.
“Flood insurance rate map (FIRM)" means the official map on which the Federal Insurance
Administration has delineated both the areas of special flood hazards and the risk premium zones
applicable to the City.
“Flood insurance study” means the official report provided by the Federal Insurance and
Mitigation Administration that includes the flood profiles, the FIRM, and the water surface
elevation of the base flood (44 CFR Part 59).
“Flood protection elevation” means an elevation that is one foot or more above the base flood
elevation.
“Floodplain” is synonymous with 100-year floodplain and means that land area susceptible to
inundation with a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The limit of
this area shall be based on flood ordinance regulation maps or a reasonable method which meets
the objectives of the SMA.
“Floodproofing” means adaptations that ensure a structure is substantially resistant to the passage
of water below the flood protection elevation and resists hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and
effects of buoyancy.
“Floodway” means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas through
which the base flood is discharged. Floodways identified on flood boundary and floodway maps
become “regulatory floodways” within which encroachment or obstructions are prohibited.
“Floodway dependent structure,” for purposes of applying Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas,
means structures such as, but not limited to, dams, levees, pump stations, stream bank stabilization,
boat launches and related recreational structures, bridge piers and abutments, and fisheries
enhancement or stream restoration projects.
“Functions” and “values,” for purposes of applying Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas, mean the
beneficial roles served by critical areas, including, but not limited to, water quality protection and
enhancement, fish and wildlife habitat, food chain support, flood storage, conveyance and
Page 65 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 14
attenuation, groundwater recharge and discharge, erosion control, and recreation. Functions and
values may be considered independently, with functions being measured indicators such as water
quality, hydrologic functions, and habitat functions; and values being nonmeasured indicators such
as local importance, potential qualities, or recreational benefits.
“Geological hazard areas” means areas that, because of their susceptibility to erosion, sliding,
earthquake, or other geologic events, are not suited to the siting of commercial, residential, or
industrial development consistent with public health or safety concerns. Geological hazard areas
include erosion hazards, landslide hazards, mine hazards, and seismic hazards, as defined herein
and specified in PMC 29.25.070.
“Geotechnical report” or “geotechnical analysis” means a scientific study or evaluation conducted
by a qualified expert that includes a description of the ground and surface hydrology and geology,
the affected landform and its susceptibility to mass wasting, erosion, and other geologic hazards
or processes, conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of the proposed development
on geologic conditions, the adequacy of the site to be developed, the impacts of the proposed
development, alternative approaches to the proposed development, and measures to mitigate
potential site-specific and cumulative geological and hydrological impacts of the proposed
development, including the potential adverse impacts on adjacent and down-current properties.
Geotechnical reports shall conform to accepted technical standards and must be prepared by
qualified professional engineers or geologists who have professional expertise about the regional
and local shoreline geology and processes.
“Grading” means stripping, cutting, filling, or stockpiling of land, including the land in its cut or
filled condition to create new grade.
“Groin” means a barrier type of structure extending from the stream bank into a water body for
the purpose of the protection of a shoreline and adjacent uplands by influencing the movement of
water or deposition of materials.
“Ground cover” means all types of vegetation other than trees.
“Guidelines” means those standards adopted by the department to implement the policy of Chapter
90.58 RCW for regulation of use of the shorelines of the state prior to adoption of SMPs. Such
standards shall also provide criteria for local governments and the department in developing and
amending SMPs.
“Hazard areas” means areas designated as frequently flooded or geologically hazardous areas due
to potential for erosion, landslide, seismic activity, mine collapse, or other geologically hazardous
conditions, including steep slopes.
“Hazardous substance(s)” means:
(a) A hazardous substance as defined by Section 101(14) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; any substance designated pursuant
to Section 311(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Water Act (CWA); any hazardous waste having the
Page 66 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 15
characteristics identified under or listed pursuant to Section 3001 of the Solid Waste Disposal
Act (but not including any waste the regulation of which under the Solid Waste Disposal Act
has been suspended by Act of Congress); any toxic pollutant listed under Section 307(a) of the
CWA; or any imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture with respect to which the
United States Environmental Protection Agency has taken action pursuant to Section 7 of the
Toxic Substances Control Act; and
(b) Hazardous substances that include any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material,
substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibit any of the
physical, chemical, or biological properties described in WAC 173-303-090, 173-303-102, or
173-303-103.
“Heavy equipment” means such construction machinery as backhoes, treaded tractors, dump
trucks, and front-end loaders.
“High-intensity land use” means land uses consisting of commercial, urban, industrial,
institutional, retail, residential with more than one unit per acre, agricultural (dairies, nurseries,
raising and harvesting crops, requiring annual tilling, and raising and maintaining animals), high-
intensity recreation (golf courses, ball fields), and hobby farms.
“Hydraulic project approval (HPA)” means a permit issued by WDFW for modification towaters
of the state in accordance with Chapter 75.20 RCW.
“Impervious surface area” means a hard surface area, which either prevents or retards the entry of
water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. Impervious surface
shall also include a hard surface area, which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities
or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development.
Common impervious surfaces include rooftops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or
storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads with compacted subgrade, packed earthen
materials, and oiled, macadam or other surfaces, which similarly impede the natural infiltration of
storm water. Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities shall not be considered as impervious
surfaces.
“In-stream structures” function for the impoundment, diversion, or use of water for hydroelectric
generation and transmission (including public and private facilities), flood control, irrigation,
water supply (domestic and industrial), recreation, or fisheries enhancement.
“Invasive, nonnative vegetation species” means the plants listed for Eastern Washington in
Washington State Noxious Weed Board Publication No. 820-264E (N/6/09), or the latest version
of this document.
“Isolated wetland” means those wetlands and their buffers that are outside of the following critical
areas and their buffers, where applicable: 100-year floodplain, lake, river, stream, or wetland.
Isolated wetlands have no contiguous hydric soil or hydrophytic vegetation between the wetland
and any surface water.
Page 67 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 16
“Landslide” means downslope movement of a mass of soil, rock, snow or ice, including, but not
limited to, rock falls, slumps, mudflows, debris flows, torrents, earth flows, and snow avalanches.
“Landslide hazard areas” means those areas potentially subject to landslides based on a
combination of geologic, topographic, and hydrologic factors.
“Low-intensity land use” includes forestry and open space (such as passive recreation and natural
resources preservation).
“Lowest floor” means the lowest enclosed area (including basement) of a structure. An unfinished
or flood-resistant enclosure, usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or storage in an
area other than a basement area, is not considered a building’s lowest floor; provided, that such
enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable nonelevation design
requirements of these critical area regulations found in PMC 29.25.060, Flood hazard areas (i.e.,
provided there are adequate flood ventilation openings).
“May” means the action is acceptable, provided it conforms to the provisions of this SMP.
“Mitigation sequencing” means the process of avoiding, reducing, or compensating for the adverse
environmental impact(s) of a proposal, including the following actions, listed in the order of
preference, the first being the most preferred:
(a) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
(b) Where impact on critical areas or their buffers will not be avoided, demonstrating that the
impact meets the criteria for granting a shoreline variance permit or other administratively
approved alteration;
(c) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its
implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or
reduce impacts;
(d) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment;
(e) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations
during the life of the action;
(f) Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or
environments; and
(g) Monitoring the impact and the compensation projects and taking appropriate corrective
measures.
Page 68 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 17
“Mixed-use” or “mixed-use development” means a combination of uses within the same building
or site as a part of an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and
coherent physical design that includes a mix of water-oriented and nonwater-oriented uses.
“Moderate-intensity land use” includes residential at a density of one unit per acre or less,
moderate-intensity open space (parks), and agriculture (moderate-intensity land uses such as
orchards and hay fields).
“Monitoring” means the collection of data by various methods for the purpose of understanding
natural systems and features, evaluating the impact of development proposals on such systems,
and/or assessing the performance of mitigation measures imposed as conditions of development.
“Must” means a mandate; the action is required.
“Native vegetation” means plant species that are indigenous to the region.
“New agricultural activities” are activities that meet the definition of agricultural activities but are
proposed on land not in agricultural use at the adoption date of this SMP.
“New construction” means structures for which the start of construction commenced on or after
the effective date of the ordinance codified in this SMP.
“Nonconforming development” or “nonconforming structure” means an existing structure that was
lawfully constructed at the time it was built but is no longer fully consistent with present
regulations such as setbacks, buffers or yards; area; bulk; height or density standards due to
subsequent changes to the master program.
“Nonconforming lot” means a lot that met dimensional requirements of the applicable master
program at the time of its establishment but now contains less than the required width, depth or
area due to subsequent changes to the master program.
Formatted: Font color: AutoFormatted: Font color: Auto, Pattern: Clear
“Nonconforming use” means an existing shoreline use that was lawfully established prior to the
effective date of the act or the applicable master program, but which does not conform to present
use regulations due to subsequent changes to the master program.
“Nonwater-oriented uses” means those uses that are not water-dependent, water-related, or water
enjoyment.
“Normal maintenance” means those usual acts that are necessary to prevent a property’s decline,
lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition.
“Normal repair” means to restore a structure or development to a state comparable to its original
condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location, and external
appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair
causes substantial adverse impacts on shoreline resources or environment. Replacement of a
Page 69 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 18
structure or development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common
method of repair for the type of structure or development, and the replacement structure or
development is comparable to the original structure or development, including but not limited to
its size, shape, configuration, location, and external appearance, and the replacement does not
cause substantial adverse impacts on shoreline resources or environment.
“Ordinary high water mark (OHWM)” means that mark that will be found by examining the bed
and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and
so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of
the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may
naturally change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or the
department. Where the OHWM cannot be found, it shall be the line of mean high water. For
braided streams, the OHWM is found on the banks forming the outer limits of the depression
within which the braiding occurs.
“Practical alternative” means an alternative that is available and capable of being carried out after
taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project
purposes, and having less impact on critical areas.
“Primitive trail” means unimproved and unpaved, but physically defined pathway for
nonmotorized movement.
“Priority habitat” means a habitat type with unique or significant value to one or more species. An
area classified and mapped as priority habitat must have one or more of the following attributes:
(a) Comparatively high fish or wildlife density;
(b) Comparatively high fish or wildlife species diversity;
(c) Fish spawning habitat;
(d) Important wildlife habitat;
(e) Important fish or wildlife seasonal range;
(f) Important fish or wildlife movement corridor;
(g) Rearing and foraging habitat;
(h) Refugia habitat;
(i) Limited availability;
(j) High vulnerability to habitat alteration; or
(k) Unique or dependent species.
Page 70 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 19
A priority habitat may be described by a unique vegetation type or by a dominant plant species
that is of primary importance to fish and wildlife. A priority habitat may also be described by
a successional stage (such as old growth and mature forests). Alternatively, a priority habitat
may consist of a specific habitat element (such as caves or snags) of key value to fish and
wildlife. A priority habitat may contain priority and/or nonpriority fish and wildlife.
“Priority species” means species requiring protective measures and/or management guidelines to
ensure their persistence at genetically viable population levels. Priority species are those that meet
any of the following criteria:
(a) Criterion 1. State-listed or state-proposed species. State-listed species are those native fish
and wildlife species legally designated as endangered (WAC 232-12-014), threatened (WAC
232-12-011), or sensitive (WAC 232-12-011). State-proposed species are those fish and
wildlife species that will be reviewed by the WDFW (POL-M-6001) for possible listing as
endangered, threatened, or sensitive according to the process and criteria defined in WAC 232-
12-297.
(b) Criterion 2. Vulnerable aggregations. Vulnerable aggregations include those species or
groups of animals susceptible to significant population declines, within a specific area or
statewide, by virtue of their inclination to congregate.
(c) Criterion 3. Species of recreational, commercial, and/or tribal importance. Native and
nonnative fish and wildlife species of recreational or commercial importance and recognized
species used for tribal ceremonial and subsistence purposes that are vulnerable to habitat loss
or degradation.
(d) Criterion 4. Species listed under the Federal Endangered Species Act as either proposed,
threatened, or endangered.
“Provisions” means any definition, policy, goal, regulation, requirement, standard, authorization,
prohibition, guideline criteria, or environment designations.
“Public access” means physical and visual access. Public access includes the ability of the general
public to reach, touch, and enjoy the water’s edge, to travel on the waters of the state, and to view
the water and the shoreline from adjacent locations. The following are examples of public access:
(a) Visual Access. Visual public access may consist of view corridors, viewpoints, or other
means of visual approach to public waters.
(b) Physical Access. Physical public access may consist of a dedication of land or easement
and a physical improvement in the form of a walkway, trail, bikeway, park, boat or canoe and
kayak launching ramp, dock area, view platform, or other area serving as a means of physical
approach to public waters adjoining habitat and wildlife areas. A visual aesthetic will include
vegetation and wildlife that exist along the shoreline and not just a view of the water.
Page 71 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 20
“Public access plan” means the City of Pasco’s Rivershore Linkage and Amenity Plan adopted on
July 16, 2012.
“Public agency” means every city, county, state, or federal office, every officer, every institution,
whether educational, correctional, or other, and every department, division, board, and commission
that provides services or recommendations to the public or other such agencies.
“Public utility” means a public service corporation performing some public service subject to
special governmental regulations, or a governmental agency performing similar public services,
either of which are paid for directly by the recipients thereof. Such services shall include water
supply, electric power, gas, and transportation for persons and freight.
“Qualified professional” means a person with experience and training in the pertinent discipline,
and who is a qualified expert with expertise appropriate for the relevant critical area or shoreline
subject. A qualified professional must have obtained a B.S., B.A., or equivalent degree or
certification in biology, engineering, environmental studies, fisheries, geomorphology, landscape
architecture, forestry or related field, and two years of related work experience.
(a) A qualified professional for wildlife, habitats, or wetlands must have a degree in biology,
zoology, ecology, fisheries, or related field, and professional experience in Washington State.
(b) A qualified professional for a geological hazard must be a professional engineer or
geologist licensed in the State of Washington.
(c) A qualified professional for critical aquifer recharge areas means a hydrogeologist,
geologist, engineer, or other scientist with experience in preparing hydrogeologic assessments.
(d) A qualified professional with flood and channel migration zone expertise must be a
hydrologist or fluvial geomorphologist.
(e) A qualified professional for vegetation management must be a registered landscape
architect, certified arborist, biologist, or professional forester with a corresponding degree or
certification.
(f) A qualified archaeologist must be a person qualified for addressing cultural and historic
resources protection and preservation, with a degree in archaeology, anthropology, history,
classics or other germane disciplines with a specialization in archaeology and/or historic
preservation and with a minimum of two years of experience in preparing cultural resource site
assessments reports.
“Recreational development” means the modification of the natural or existing environment to
accommodate commercial and public facilities designed and used to provide recreational
opportunities to the public. Commercial recreational development should be consistent with
commercial development defined herein.
Page 72 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 21
“Recreational vehicle” means a vehicle designed primarily for recreational camping, travel, or
seasonal use that has its own mode of power or is mounted on or towed by another vehicle,
including but not limited to travel trailers, folding camping trailers, truck campers, motor homes,
motorized boats, and multi-use vehicles or any structure inspected, approved, and designated a
recreational vehicle by and bearing the insignia of the State of Washington or any other state or
federal agency having the authority to approve recreational vehicles.
“Research and monitoring” includes activities associated with identifying data, and collecting,
monitoring, and evaluating scientific data and information to support water, fisheries, and other
ecological services management, restoration, and operational activities. Example activities that
could be included under this category include installing and operating stream and water quality
monitoring gauges, collecting fisheries data using a trap or other devices, setting up and using
equipment to collect sediment data, and other data collection activities that need to utilize the
shoreline and waters of the state to meet public objectives.
“Residential development” entails one or more buildings, structures, lots, parcels or portions
thereof that are designed, used, or intended to be used as a place of abode for human beings. These
include single-family residences, residential subdivisions, short residential subdivisions, attached
dwellings, and all accessory uses or structures normally associated with residential uses. Accessory
residential uses include garages, sheds, tennis courts, swimming pools, parking areas, fences,
cabanas, saunas, and guest cottages. Hotels, motels, dormitories, or any other type of overnight or
transient housing is excluded from the residential category and must be considered commercial
uses depending on project characteristics.
“Restore,” “restoration,” or “ecological restoration” means the reestablishment or upgrading of
impaired natural or enhanced ecological shoreline processes or functions. This may be
accomplished through measures, including, but not limited to, revegetation, removal of intrusive
shoreline structures, and removal or treatment of toxic materials. Restoration does not imply a
requirement for returning the shoreline area to pre-aboriginal or pre-European settlement
conditions.
“Riparian habitat” means areas adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contain
elements of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems that mutually influence each other.
“Salmonid” means a member of the fish family Salmonidae, including: King, Chinook, Coho,
chum, sockeye, and pink salmon; cutthroat, brook, brown, rainbow, and steelhead trout; kokanee;
and native char (bull trout and Dolly Varden).
“Section 404 Permit” means a permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for
the placement of dredge or fill material waterward of the OHWM or clearing in waters of the
United States, including wetlands, in accordance with 33 USC § 1344.
“Seismic hazard areas” means areas that are subject to severe risk of damage as a result of
earthquake-induced ground shaking, slope failure, settlement, or soil liquefaction.
“Shall” means a mandate; the action must be done.
Page 73 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 22
“Shoreline areas” and “shoreline jurisdiction” means all “shorelines of the state” and “shorelands”
as defined in RCW 90.58.030.
“Shoreline Master Program” means the comprehensive use plan for a described area and the use
regulations, together with maps, diagrams, charts, or other descriptive material and text, a
statement of desired goals, and standards developed in accordance with the policies enunciated in
RCW 90.58.020. As provided in RCW 36.70A.480, the goals and policies of an SMP for a county
or city approved under Chapter 90.58 RCW shall be considered an element of the county or City’s
Comprehensive Plan. All other portions of the SMP for a county or city adopted under Chapter
90.58 RCW, including use regulations, shall be considered a part of the county or city’s
development regulations.
“Shoreline modifications” means those actions that modify the physical configuration or qualities
of the shoreline area, usually through the construction of a physical element such as a dike,
breakwater, pier, weir, dredged basin, fill, bulkhead, or other shoreline structure. They can include
other actions, such as clearing, grading, or application of chemicals.
“Shoreline stabilization” means actions taken to address erosion impacts to property and dwellings,
businesses, or structures caused by natural processes such as current, flood, wind, or wave action.
These actions include structural and nonstructural methods. Nonstructural methods include
building setbacks, relocation of the structure to be protected, groundwater management, and
planning and regulatory measures to avoid the need for structural stabilization.
“Should” means that the particular action is required unless there is a demonstrated, compelling
reason, based on policy of the SMA and this SMP, against taking the action.
“Significant adverse environmental impacts” (as used in State Environmental Policy Act [SEPA])
means a reasonable likelihood of more than a moderate adverse impact on environmental quality
(WAC 197-11-794).
“Significant vegetation removal” means the removal or alteration of trees, shrubs, and/or ground
cover by clearing, grading, cutting, burning, chemical means, or other activity that causes
significant ecological impacts on functions provided by such vegetation. The removal of invasive
or noxious weeds does not constitute significant vegetation removal. Tree pruning, not including
tree topping, where it does not affect ecological functions, does not constitute significant
vegetation removal.
“Site assessment requirements” means requirements for critical area report.
“Snag” means the remaining trunk of a dying, diseased, or dangerous tree that is reduced in height
and stripped of all live branches.
“Special flood hazard area” means an area subject to a base or 100-year flood; areas of special
flood hazard are shown on a flood hazard boundary map or flood insurance rate map as Zone A,
AO, A1-30, AE, A99, AH.
Page 74 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 23
“Species and habitats of local importance” means those species that may not be endangered,
threatened, or critical from a statewide perspective, but are of local concern due to their population
status, sensitivity to habitat manipulation, or other educational, cultural, or historic attributes.
These species may be priority habitats, priority species, and those habitats and species identified
in the critical areas code as having local importance (e.g., elk).
“Species, threatened and endangered” means those native species that are listed by WDFW
pursuant to RCW 77.12.070 as threatened (WAC 232-12-011) or endangered (WAC 232-12-014),
or that are listed as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (16 USC
§ 1533).
“Start of construction” means and includes substantial improvement and means the date the
building permit was issued; provided, that the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction,
placement, or other improvement was within 180 days of the permit issuance date. For cumulative
tracking, the permit may extend beyond the specified time frame to the time of permit completion.
The actual start means either the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site
such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or
any work beyond the stage of excavation, or the placement of a manufactured home on a
foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading,
and filling, nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways, nor does it include
excavation for a basement, footings, piers, or foundation or the erection of temporary forms, nor
does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings such as garages or sheds not
occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. For a substantial improvement, the
actual start of construction means the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural
part of a building, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the building.
“Steep slopes” means those slopes (excluding City-approved geotechnically engineered slopes) 40
percent or steeper within a vertical elevation change of at least 10 feet. A slope is defined by
establishing its toe and top and is measured by averaging the inclination over at least 10 feet of
vertical relief.
“Stream” means any portion of a channel, bed, bank, or bottom waterward of the OHWM of waters
of the state, including areas in which fish may spawn, reside, or pass, and tributary waters with
defined bed or banks, which influence the quality of fish habitat downstream. This includes
watercourses that flow on an intermittent basis or fluctuate in level during the year and applies to
the entire bed of such watercourse whether or not the water is at peak level. This definition does
not include irrigation ditches, canals, storm water runoff devices, or other entirely artificial
watercourses, except where they exist in a natural watercourse that has been altered by humans.
“Structure” means a permanent or temporary edifice or building, or any piece of work artificially
built or comprising parts joined together in some definite manner, whether installed on, above, or
below the surface of the ground or water.
“Substantial damage” means damage of any origin, including intentional and unintentional
demolition, sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before-
Page 75 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 24
damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the assessed value of the structure before
the damage occurred.
“Substantial improvement” means any rehabilitation, repair, reconstruction, addition, or other
improvement of a building when the cost of the improvement equals or exceeds 50 percent of the
market value of the building before start of construction of the improvement. The term includes
buildings that have incurred substantial damage or damage of any origin sustained by a building
when the cost of restoring the building to its pre-damaged condition would equal or exceed 50
percent of the market value before the damage occurred. Substantial improvement does not include
any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or local health,
sanitary, or safety code specifications, which have been identified by the local code enforcement
official and are the minimum necessary to ensure safe living conditions or any alteration of a
historic structure; provided, that the alteration will not preclude the structure’s continued
designation as a historic structure.
“Substantially degrade” means to cause significant ecological impact.
“Thinning” means the evenly spaced noncommercial removal of up to 40 percent of trees and
woody shrubs.
“Topping” means the severing of main trunks or stems of vegetation at any place above 25 percent
of the vegetation height.
“Transportation facilities” are those structures and developments that provide for the movement
of people, goods, and services. These include roads and highways, railroad facilities, bridges,
parking facilities, bicycle paths, trails, and other related facilities.
“Tree removal” means the removal of a tree, through either direct or indirect actions, including,
but not limited to: (a) clearing, damaging or poisoning resulting in an unhealthy or dead tree; (b)
removal of at least half of the live crown; or (c) damage to roots or trunk that is likely to destroy
the tree’s structural integrity.
“Trees” means any living woody plant characterized by one main stem or trunk and many branches
and having a diameter of four inches or more measured 24 inches above ground level.
“Unavoidable” means adverse impacts that remain after all appropriate and practicable avoidance
and minimization have been achieved.
“Utility” means a service and/or facility that produces, transmits, carries, stores, processes, or
disposes of electrical power, gas, potable water, storm water, communications (including, but not
limited to, telephone and cable), sewage, oil, and the like.
“Vegetation” means plant life growing below, at, and above the soil surface.
“Vegetation alteration” means any clearing, grading, cutting, topping, limbing, or pruning of
vegetation.
Page 76 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 25
“Water-dependent use” means a use or portion of a use that cannot exist in a location that is not
adjacent to the water and that is dependent on the water by reason of the intrinsic nature of its
operations.
“Water-enjoyment use” means a recreational use or other use that facilitates public access to the
shoreline as a primary characteristic of the use or a use that provides for recreational use or
aesthetic enjoyment of the shoreline for a substantial number of people as a general characteristic
of the use, and which through location, design, and operation ensures the public’s ability to enjoy
the physical and aesthetic qualities of the shoreline. In order to qualify as a water enjoyment use,
the use must be open to the general public and the shoreline-oriented space within. The project
must be devoted to the specific aspects of the use that fosters shoreline enjoyment.
“Water-oriented use” means a use that is water-dependent, water-related, or water enjoyment, or
a combination of such uses.
“Water quality” means the physical characteristics of water within shoreline jurisdiction, including
water quantity, hydrological, physical, chemical, aesthetic, recreation-related, and biological
characteristics. Where used in this SMP, the term water quantity refers only to development and
uses regulated under this chapter and affecting water quantity, such as impermeable surfaces and
storm water handling practices. Water quantity, for purposes of this chapter, does not mean the
withdrawal of groundwater or diversion of surface water pursuant to RCW 90.03.250 through
90.03.340.
“Water-related use” means a use or portion of a use, which is not intrinsically dependent on a
waterfront location but whose economic viability is dependent upon a waterfront location because:
(a) The use has a functional requirement for a waterfront location such as the arrival or
shipment of materials by water or the need for large quantities of water; or
(b) The use provides a necessary service supportive of the water dependent uses and the
proximity of the use to its customers makes its services less expensive and/or more convenient.
“Water resources inventory area” means one of 62 watersheds in the State of Washington, each
comprising drainage areas of a stream or streams, as established in Chapter 173-500 WAC as it
existed on January 1, 1997.
“Weir” means a structure generally built perpendicular to the shoreline for the purpose of diverting
water or trapping sediment or other moving objects transported by water.
“Wetlands” are areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and
duration sufficient to support and that under normal circumstances do support a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include
swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands
intentionally created from nonwetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage
ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds,
and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally
Page 77 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 26
created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those
artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland areas to mitigate the conversion of
wetlands.
Wetland Categories.
(a) Category I. These wetlands are: (i) alkali wetlands; (ii) wetlands that are identified by
scientists of the Washington Natural Heritage Program/WDNR as high quality wetlands; (iii)
bogs; (iv) mature and old-growth forested wetlands over one-fourth acre with slow-growing
trees; (v) forests with stands of aspen; and (vi) wetlands that perform many functions very well.
(b) Category II. These wetlands are: (i) forested wetlands in the floodplains of rivers; (ii)
mature and old-growth forested wetlands over one-fourth acre with fast-growing trees; (iii)
vernal pools; and (iv) wetlands that perform functions well. These wetlands are difficult,
though not impossible, to replace, and provide high levels of some functions.
(c) Category III. These wetlands are: (i) forested wetlands in the floodplains of rivers; (ii)
mature and old-growth forested wetlands over one-fourth acre with fast-growing trees; (iii)
vernal pools; and (iv) wetlands that perform functions well. These wetlands are difficult,
though not impossible, to replace, and provide high levels of some functions.
(d) Category IV. Category IV wetlands have the lowest level of functions and are often
heavily disturbed. These are wetlands that could be replaced, and in some cases improved.
However, experience has shown that replacement cannot be guaranteed in any specific case.
These wetlands may provide some important functions and also need to be protected.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.080.]
Chapter 29.10
ENVIRONMENT DESIGNATION
Sections:
29.10.010 Environment designations.
29.10.020 Aquatic.
29.10.030 Natural.
29.10.040 Urban conservancy.
29.10.050 Public flood protection.
29.10.060 Recreation.
29.10.070 High intensity – Industrial.
29.10.080 High intensity – Mixed use.
29.10.090 Shoreline residential.
29.10.010 Environment designations.
(1) The City has designated shorelines pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW by defining them,
providing criteria for their identification, and establishing shoreline ecological functions to be
protected. Project proponents are responsible for determining whether a shoreline exists and is
Page 78 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 27
regulated pursuant to this SMP. The SMP classifies the City’s shoreline into eight shoreline
environment designations consistent with the purpose and designation criteria as follows:
(a) Aquatic;
(b) Natural;
(c) Urban conservancy;
(d) Public flood protection;
(e) Recreation;
(f) High intensity – Industrial;
(g) High intensity – Mixed use;
(h) Shoreline residential.
(2) Official Shoreline Maps. Shoreline area designations are delineated on a map by reach and
subreach (SR), hereby incorporated as a part of this SMP (PMC 29.35.170), and shall be known
as the Official Shoreline Map. Maps indicating the extent of shoreline jurisdiction and shoreline
designations are to be used in conjunction with the most current scientific and technical
information available, field investigations, and on site surveys to accurately establish the location
and extent of shoreline jurisdiction when a project is proposed.
(3) Unmapped or Undesignated Shorelines. All areas meeting the definition of a shoreline of the
state or a Shoreline of Statewide Significance, whether mapped or not, are subject to the provisions
of this SMP.
(4) Interpretation of Environment Designation Boundaries.
(a) Whenever existing physical features are inconsistent with boundaries on the Official
Shoreline Map, the Shoreline Administrator shall interpret the boundaries. Appeals of such
interpretations may be filed pursuant to PMC 29.35.120, Appeals.
(b) All shoreline areas waterward of the OHWM shall be designated aquatic.
(c) Only one shoreline area designation shall apply to a given shoreland area. In the case of
parallel designations, designations shall be divided along an identified linear feature. Such
linear features shall be clearly noted in the metadata associated with the Official Shoreline
Map.
(d) All areas within shorelines that are not mapped and/or designated are automatically
assigned an urban conservancy designation.
(e) Environment designations for shorelines within the UGA will be effective immediately
upon annexation of the area into the City limits.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.100.]
29.10.020 Aquatic.
Page 79 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 28
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the aquatic shoreline designation is to protect, restore, and manage
the unique characteristics and resources of the areas waterward of the OHWM.
(2) Designation Criteria. An aquatic shoreline designation is assigned to lands and waters
waterward of the OHWM.
(3) Management Policies.
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP, the following
management policies shall apply:
(i) New overwater structures should be allowed only for water-dependent uses, public
access, recreation, or ecological restoration.
(ii) Shoreline uses and modifications should be designed and managed to prevent
degradation of water quality and natural hydrographic conditions.
(iii) In-water uses should be allowed where impacts can be mitigated to ensure no net loss
of shoreline ecological functions. Permitted in-water uses must be managed to avoid
impacts to shoreline ecological functions. Unavoidable impacts must be minimized and
mitigated.
(iv) On navigable waters or their beds, all uses and developments should be located and
designed to:
(A) Minimize interference with surface navigation;
(B) Consider impacts to public views; and
(C) Allow for the safe, unobstructed passage of fish and wildlife, particularly species
dependent on migration.
(b) Multiple or shared use of overwater and water-access facilities should be encouraged to
reduce the impacts of shoreline development and increase effective use of water resources.
(c) Structures and activities permitted should be related in size, form, design, and intensity of
use to those permitted in the immediately adjacent upland area. The size of new overwater
structures should be limited to the minimum necessary to support the structure’s intended use.
(d) Natural light should be allowed to penetrate to the extent necessary to support fisheries
and nearshore aquatic habitat unless other illumination is required by state or federal agencies.
(e) Shoreline uses, development, activities, and modifications in the aquatic shoreline
designation requiring use of adjacent landside property should be in a shoreline designation
that allows that use, development, activity, or modification.
Page 80 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 29
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.110.]
29.10.030 Natural.
(All islands, Subreach [SR] 1d)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the natural shoreline designation is to protect those shoreline areas
that are relatively free of human influence or that include intact or minimally degraded shoreline
ecological functions less tolerant of human use. These systems require that only very low-intensity
uses be allowed in order to maintain the ecological functions and ecosystem-wide processes.
Consistent with the policies of the designation, restoration of degraded shorelines within this
environment is appropriate.
(2) Designation Criteria. The following criteria should be considered in assigning a natural
environment designation:
(a) The shoreline ecological functions are substantially intact and have a high opportunity for
preservation and low opportunity for restoration;
(b) The shoreline is generally in public or conservancy ownership or under covenant,
easement, or a conservation tax program;
(c) The shoreline contains little or no development or is planned for development that would
have minimal adverse impacts to ecological functions or risk to human safety;
(d) The shoreline has high potential for low-impact, passive, or public recreation; and
(e) The shoreline is considered to represent ecosystems and geologic types that have high
scientific and educational value.
(3) Management Policies. In addition to other applicable policies and regulations, the following
management policies shall apply:
(a) Any use beyond existing uses that would substantially degrade shoreline ecological
functions or natural character of the shoreline area should not be allowed;
(b) Scientific, historic, cultural, educational research, and low-impact, passive recreational
uses are allowed in addition to existing uses, while meeting no net loss of ecological function
requirements;
(c) Single-family residential development may be allowed as a conditional use if the density
and intensity of such use is limited as necessary to protect ecological functions and is consistent
with the purpose of the environment;
(d) Vegetation should remain undisturbed except for removal of noxious vegetation and
invasive species through ongoing management activities or as part of a development proposal.
Proposed subdivision or lot line adjustments, new development, or significant vegetation
Page 81 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 30
removal that would reduce the capability of vegetation to perform normal ecological functions
should not be allowed;
(e) Uses that would deplete physical or biological resources or impair views to or from the
shoreline over time should be prohibited;
(f) Only physical alterations that serve to support an existing use, protect a significant or
unique physical, biological, or visual shoreline feature that might otherwise be degraded or
destroyed, or those alterations that are the minimum necessary to support a permitted use
should be allowed; and
(g) Only the following types of signs should be considered for location in the shorelines:
interpretive, directional, navigational, regulatory, and public.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.120.]
29.10.040 Urban conservancy.
(Open-space areas located waterward of the parcel boundaries in the Columbia River Reach 1,
Subreaches (SR) 3a (north portion of Chiawana Park), 3b, 5c (nonlevee portion of the wetland near
Riverview Park), 6c (portion waterward of the trail), Reach 7 (Sacajawea Park, excluding the boat
launch and recreation area), and SR 8a.)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the urban conservancy environment is to protect and restore
ecological functions of open space, floodplain, and other sensitive lands where they exist in urban
and developed settings, while allowing a variety of compatible uses.
(2) Designation Criteria. The following criteria are used to consider an urban conservancy
environment designation:
(a) The shoreline contains open space, floodplain, or other sensitive areas that should not be
more intensively developed;
(b) The shoreline has riparian vegetation with high to moderate ecological functions;
(c) The shoreline has potential for development that is compatible with ecological restoration;
or
(d) The shoreline is not generally suitable for water-dependent uses, however, has moderate-
to-high potential for public, water-related, or water-enjoyment uses where ecological functions
can be maintained or restored.
(3) Management Policies. In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(a) Shoreline uses that preserve the natural character of the area or promote preservation of
open space, floodplain, or sensitive lands either directly or during the long-term should be the
Page 82 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 31
primary allowed uses. Uses that result in restoration of ecological functions should be allowed
if the use is otherwise compatible with the purpose of the environment and the setting.
(b) Encourage regulations for shoreline stabilization measures, vegetation conservation,
water quality, and shoreline modifications to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological
functions;
(c) Public access and public recreation uses should be allowed whenever feasible and
significant ecological impacts can be mitigated; or
(d) Water-oriented uses should be given priority over nonwater-oriented uses. For shoreline
areas adjacent to commercially navigable waters, water-dependent uses should be given
priority.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.130.]
29.10.050 Public flood protection.
(Leveed areas along the Columbia River, where limited ecological function and future
development potential exists, and the areas are dedicated for public recreation as part of the
regional trail system.)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the public flood protection environment designation is to provide
flood protection features while protecting shoreline ecological functions with limitations imposed
by the flood protection features, and provide recreational opportunities. In addition to existing
levees, examples of uses that are appropriate in a public flood protection shoreline designation
include public access and recreation uses consistent with the protection of public safety and
property by the flood protection features.
(2) Designation Criteria. The following criteria are used to consider a public flood protection
environment designation:
(a) The shoreline has low-to-moderate ecological function with low-to-moderate opportunity
for preservation or restoration;
(b) The shoreline is owned and maintained by public agencies;
(c) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is related to flood protection,
public utility, infrastructure, and low-intensity recreation, facility rehabilitation, or upgrade
modifications;
(d) The shoreline has limited scientific or educational value or unique historic or cultural
resources values; or
(e) The shoreline has low-to-moderate potential for public, water-oriented recreation where
ecological functions can be maintained or restored.
Page 83 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 32
(3) Management Policies. In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(a) In regulating uses in the Public Flood Protection environment, first priority should be
given to flood protection and water-dependent public facility uses. Second priority should be
given to water-related and water-enjoyment uses that are not in conflict with the flood
protection uses. Nonwater-oriented uses are allowed as part of the operational needs.
(b) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions as a
result of redevelopment, facility upgrades, and new development. Where applicable,
development shall include environmental enhancement of the shoreline in accordance with
USACE McNary Pool Management Plan and the City’s SMP Restoration Plan.
(c) Existing visual and physical public access opportunities shall be maintained and enhanced
where feasible and appropriate, as consistent with PMC 29.15.070, Public access.
(d) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as appropriate landscape
features, screening, and maintenance of natural vegetative buffers.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.140.]
29.10.060 Recreation.
(Chiawana, Wade, Riverview, Schlagel, and Sacajawea parks, marina, boat launch areas)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the recreation environment designation is to provide for water-
oriented recreational uses with some commercial uses to support recreational uses while protecting
existing ecological functions, conserving existing natural resources, and restoring ecological
functions in areas that have been previously degraded.
(2) Designation Criteria. The following criteria are used to consider a recreation environment
designation:
(a) The shoreline has low-to-moderate ecological function with low-to-moderate opportunity
for preservation and restoration.
(b) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is recreation-related with
potential for additional recreation and recreation-related commerce, or is suitable and planned
for water-oriented uses.
(c) The shoreline has existing recreation uses or moderate-to-high potential for public and
private water-oriented recreation where ecological functions can be maintained or enhanced.
(d) The shoreline has limited scientific or educational value or unique historic or cultural
resources values.
(3) Management Policies. In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
Page 84 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 33
(a) In regulating uses in the recreation environment, first priority should be given to water-
dependent recreational uses. Second priority should be given to water-related and water-
enjoyment recreational uses. Nonwater-oriented uses should not be allowed, except as part of
mixed-use developments with a recreation focus.
(b) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions as a
result of new development. Consistent with the City’s SMP Restoration Plan, new
development may be required, as applicable, to include restoration of shoreline functions as
part of project proposals.
(c) Where feasible, visual and physical public access should be required as provided for in
PMC 29.15.070, Public access. Recreational objectives should be enhanced by combining
physical and visual public access opportunities with other recreational opportunities where
feasible.
(d) Water-oriented commercial uses should be allowed.
(e) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as sign control regulations,
appropriate development siting, screening, architectural standards, and maintenance of natural
vegetative buffers.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.150.]
29.10.070 High intensity – Industrial.
(Areas landward of the levee in SR 5b, Port of Pasco, a portion of Osprey Point, industrial areas
on Columbia River SR 6c, and the Snake River SR 8b)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the high intensity – industrial environment designation is to provide
for public and private commercial and industrial uses that need a shoreline location for operation
and are associated with water-oriented commerce and industry. Examples of uses that are
appropriate in a high intensity – industrial shoreline environment include water-oriented
commercial uses, water supply diversion, transportation, navigation uses, barge and conveyance
facilities, and similar uses. This environment may also provide for some recreation, while
protecting existing ecological functions and restoring ecological functions in areas that have been
previously degraded.
(2) Designation Criteria. Assign a high intensity – industrial environment designation to
shoreline areas where:
(a) The shoreline has low-to-moderate ecological function with low-to-moderate opportunity
for preservation or restoration.
(b) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is related to public utility,
infrastructure, industry, or commerce with potential for additional related development, facility
rehabilitation, or upgrade modifications.
(c) Existing landward industrial development exists and has potential for future growth and
development.
Page 85 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 34
(d) The operation of such uses depends on proximity to water, including high-intensity uses
related to industrial production, conveyance, transportation, or navigation.
(e) The shoreline has limited scientific or educational value or unique historic or cultural
resources values.
(3) Management Policies. In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(a) In regulating uses in the high intensity – industrial environment, first priority should be given
to water-dependent commercial and industrial uses. Second priority should be given to water-
related and water-enjoyment uses that are not in conflict with the commercial and industrial uses.
Nonwater-oriented uses are allowed as part of mixed uses to support the water-oriented uses.
(b) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions as a result
of redevelopment, facility upgrades, and new development. Where applicable, development shall
include environmental cleanup and restoration of the shoreline to comply in accordance with any
relevant state and federal law.
(c) Where feasible and appropriate, visual and physical public access provisions may be included
as consistent with PMC 29.15.070, Public access.
(d) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as appropriate development siting,
screening, and maintenance of natural vegetative buffers.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.160.]
29.10.080 High intensity – Mixed use.
(Port of Pasco Marine Terminal SR 6a and western half of Osprey Point)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the high intensity – mixed use environment designation is to provide
for water-oriented commercial and retail uses along with residential uses. Examples of uses that
are appropriate in a high intensity – mixed use shoreline environment include water-oriented
commercial office and retail, residential, transportation, public access, and similar uses. This
environment may also provide for some recreation, while protecting existing ecological functions
and restoring ecological functions in areas that have been previously degraded.
(2) Designation Criteria. Assign a high intensity – mixed use environment designation to
shoreline areas where:
(a) The shoreline has low-to-moderate ecological function with low-to-moderate opportunity
for preservation or restoration.
(b) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is related to public utility,
infrastructure, or commerce with potential for additional related development, facility
rehabilitation, or upgrade modifications.
Page 86 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 35
(c) Existing landward development exists and has potential for future growth and
development.
(d) The operation of such uses depends on proximity to water, including high-intensity uses
related to commerce, transportation, or navigation.
(e) The shoreline has limited or no scientific, educational, unique historic, or cultural
resources values.
(3) Management Policies. In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(a) Development in the high intensity – mixed-use environment should be managed so it
enhances and maintains the shorelines for a variety of urban uses.
(b) In regulating uses in the high intensity – mixed use environment, first priority should be
given to water-dependent commercial uses. Second priority should be given to water-related
and water-enjoyment uses that are not in conflict with the commercial uses. Nonwater-oriented
uses are allowed as part of mixed uses to support the water-oriented uses. Residential uses
should be allowed on the upper floors of developments as part of mixed uses to support the
water-oriented uses.
(c) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions as a
result of redevelopment, facility upgrades, and new development. Where applicable,
development shall include environmental cleanup and restoration of the shoreline to comply
in accordance with any relevant state and federal law.
(d) Where feasible and appropriate, visual and physical public access provisions may be
included as consistent with PMC 29.15.070, Public access.
(e) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means, such as appropriate development
siting, building design, screening, and maintenance of natural vegetative buffers.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.170.]
29.10.090 Shoreline residential.
(Residential areas along the Columbia River in Reaches 1 and 2, SRs 4a and 4b, and portions of
SRs 5b and 6b)
(1) Purpose. The purpose of the shoreline residential environment designation is to accommodate
primarily residential development and appurtenant structures, but also allow other types of
development consistent with this section. An additional purpose is to provide appropriate public
access and recreational uses.
(2) Designation Criteria. Assign a shoreline residential environment designation to shoreline
areas where:
Page 87 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 36
(a) The shoreline has low-to-moderate ecological function with low-to-moderate opportunity
for restoration.
(b) The shoreline contains mostly residential development at urban densities or in clusters in
more rural settings.
(c) The shoreline has low-to-moderate potential for low-impact, passive, or active water-
oriented recreation where ecological functions can be restored.
(3) Management Policies. In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(a) Encourage regulations that ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions as a result
of new development, such as limiting lot coverage, providing adequate setbacks from the
shoreline, promoting vegetation conservation, reducing the need for shoreline stabilization,
and maintaining or improving water quality.
(b) The scale and density of new uses and development should be compatible with the existing
residential character of the area.
(c) Public access and joint (rather than individual) use of recreational facilities should be
promoted.
(d) Access, utilities, and public services to serve proposed development within shorelines
should be constructed outside shorelines to the extent feasible and be the minimum necessary
to adequately serve existing needs and planned future development.
(e) Public or private outdoor recreation facilities should be provided with proposals for
subdivision development and encouraged with all shoreline development, if compatible with
the character of the area. Priority should be given first to water-dependent and then to water-
enjoyment recreation facilities.
(f) Commercial development should be limited to water-oriented uses. Nonwater-oriented
commercial uses should only be allowed as part of mixed-used developments.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.180.]
Chapter 29.15
GENERAL REGULATIONS
Sections:
29.15.010 Shoreline use and modification.
29.15.020 Development standards.
29.15.030 Archaeological and historic resources.
29.15.040 Environmental protection.
Page 88 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 37
29.15.050 Shoreline vegetation conservation.
29.15.060 Water quality, storm water, and nonpoint pollution.
29.15.070 Public access.
29.15.080 Flood hazard reduction.
29.15.010 Shoreline use and modification.
(1) Regulations.
(a) PMC Table 29.15.010 indicates which shoreline activities, uses, developments, and
modifications may be allowed or are prohibited in the shoreline jurisdiction within each
shoreline environment designation. Activities, uses, developments, and modifications are
classified as follows:
(i) “Permitted uses” require a shoreline substantial development permit or a shoreline
exemption.
(ii) “Conditional uses” require a shoreline special use permit per PMC 29.35.060.
(iii) “Prohibited” activities, uses, developments, and modifications are not allowed and
cannot be permitted through a variance or shoreline special use permit.
(iv) This chapter, General Regulations, and Chapter 29.20 PMC, Shoreline Modifications
and Use Regulations, shall be considered for additional limitations.
(b) All uses shall comply with the written provisions and regulations in this SMP and the
shoreline use and modification matrix in Table 29.15.010. Where there is a conflict between
the chart and the written provisions in this SMP, the written provisions shall control.
(2) General.
(a) Accessory uses shall be subject to the same shoreline permit process as their primary use.
(b) Authorized uses and modifications shall be allowed only in shoreline jurisdictions where
the underlying zoning allows for it and subject to the policies and regulations of this SMP.
(c) A use is considered unclassified when it is not listed in Table 29.15.010 or in the Chapter
29.20 PMC, Shoreline Modification and Uses Regulations. Any proposed unclassified use may
be authorized as a conditional use; provided, that the applicant can demonstrate consistency
with the requirements of this SMP.
(d) If any part of a proposed activity, use, modification, or development is not eligible for
exemption per PMC 29.35.080, Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permits,
then a shoreline substantial development permit or shoreline special use permit shall be
required for the entire proposed development project.
Page 89 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 38
(e) When a specific use or modification extends into the Aquatic environment and an abutting
upland environment without clear separation (e.g., private moorage facility or shoreline
stabilization), the most restrictive permit process shall apply to that use or modification.
(f) Shoreline and critical areas buffers found in Chapter 29.25 PMC apply to all uses and
modifications unless stated otherwise in the regulations.
(g) None of the allowed uses shall be conducted in the floodway in any environment
designation, except as allowed by PMC 29.25.060, Flood hazard areas.
(h) Administrative interpretation of these regulations shall be done according to PMC
29.35.020(2).
(3) Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix.
Table 29.15.010. Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix for City of Pasco
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
Resource Uses
Agriculture X X A1 X X X X C
Mining X X C X X C C X
Boating Facilities
Boat launch (motorized boats) A C C A A A A C
Page 90 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 39
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
Boat launch (nonmotorized boats –
canoe/kayak) A C A A A A A A
Marina A X C C A A A C
Docks, Piers, Mooring Facilities
Private and shared moorage A X A A A A A A
Public moorage A X A A A A A C
Covered moorage C X X X C C C X
Commercial Development
Water-dependent A X A A A A A A
Water-related, water-enjoyment C X C C A A A C
Nonwater-oriented C2 X C2 C2 A2 A2 A2 X
Dredging Activities
Page 91 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 40
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
Dredging A NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Dredge material disposal C X C C C C C C
Dredging and disposal as part of
ecological restoration/enhancement A A A A A A A A
Fill and Excavation
Fill waterward of OHWM and in
floodways3 C C C C C C C C
Other upland fill NA C A A A A A A
Excavation NA C4 C A A A A A
Industrial Uses
Water-dependent A5 X X C X A A X
Water-related, water enjoyment A5 X X C X A A X
Nonwater-oriented X X X C2 X A2 A2 X
Page 92 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 41
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
In-water Modifications
Breakwater C X C C C C C C
Groins and weirs C X C C C C C C
In-stream structures6 A C4 C4 A4, 6 A3 A C C
Recreational Development
Water-dependent A A7 A7 A A A A A
Water-related, water-enjoyment
(trails, accessory buildings) C C7 A7 A A A A A
Nonwater-oriented X X C2 C2 A2 A2 A2 A2
Residential Development X C A X C X A2 A
Research and Monitoring
Water-dependent A A A A A A A A
Page 93 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 42
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
Water-related, water enjoyment A A A A A A A A
Nonwater-oriented A A A A A A A A
Shoreline habitat and natural
systems enhancement projects A A A A A A A A
Shoreline Stabilization and Flood Control
Flood Control
Modification of existing flood control
facilities (dams, dikes and levees),
including replacement landward of
existing location
A A A A A A A A
New flood control facilities (Dams,
Dikes and Levees) C C8 C C C A A C
Shoreline stabilization – New
Hard C X C C C A A C
Page 94 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 43
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
Soft A A A A A A A A
Shoreline stabilization –
Replacement9 A A A A A A A A
Transportation
Highways, arterials, railroads
(parallel to OHWM) C X A A A A A A
Secondary/public access roads
(parallel to OHWM) X X A A A A A A
Roads perpendicular to the OHWM X C A A A A A A
Bridges (perpendicular to shoreline) C C C A A A A C
Existing bridges, trails, roads, and
parking facilities: improvement or
expansion
A A A A A A A A
New parking, primary X X X A10 A10 A10 A10 X
Page 95 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 44
A = Allowed with Substantial
Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special
Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA = Not Applicable Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Industrial High Intensity – Mixed Use Shoreline Residential Use/Modification
New parking, accessory X Takes permit types of primary use
Utilities
Above-ground and underground
utilities (parallel and across
shoreline)
C C A A A A A A
Notes:
1 Allowed when agricultural uses are passive, such as livestock grazing, harvesting of noncultivated crops, or small-
scale farms, or when ecological functions are degraded to the point where the land is functionally equivalent to
cultivated land.
2 New uses are allowed as part of mixed use or according to PMC 29.20.040(2) for commercial development, PMC
29.20.070(2) for industrial development, or as part of an existing use according to Chapter 29.30 PMC, Existing Uses,
Structures and Lots.
3 Fill and excavation waterward of the OHWM, to support ecological restoration is allowed with a substantial
development permit.
4 Habitat restoration and/or fish habitat enhancement purposes only.
5 Allowed as part of upland industrial water-dependent or water-related uses.
6 Construction, practices, and maintenance of facilities necessary for flood protection or Columbia Basin Project
operations and associated water-dependent uses to access, pump, and convey water for project purposes to public
agencies or private water users and as consistent with permit exemptions described in PMC 29.35.080.
7 Low intensity only.
8 Only when no other alternatives are available.
9 Exempt for protective bulkhead common to single-family residences according to PMC 29.35.080(4) and when
consistent with PMC 29.20.140(5) and (6).
10 Not allowed within 50 feet of edge of riparian vegetation corridor.
OHWM = ordinary high water mark
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.200.]
Page 96 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 45
29.15.020 Development standards.
(1) Regulations.
(a) To preserve the existing and planned character of the shoreline consistent with the
purposes of the shoreline environment designations, development standards are provided in
the table below. These standards apply to all uses and modifications unless otherwise indicated.
In addition, shoreline developments shall comply with all other dimensional requirements of
the PMC.
(b) When a development or use is proposed that does not comply with the dimensional
performance standards of this SMP, or is not otherwise allowed by administrative reduction or
administrative modification, such development or use can only be authorized by approval of a
shoreline variance permit.
(c) No permit shall be issued for any new or expanded building or structure of more than 35
feet above average grade level on shorelines of the state that will obstruct the view of a
substantial number of residences on areas adjoining such shorelines, except for the high
intensity environment designation areas, or where the SMP does not prohibit the same, and
then only when overriding considerations of the public interest will be served.
(2) Shoreline Development Standards Matrix.
Table 29.15.020. Shoreline Development Standards Matrix for City of Pasco
Use/Modification Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Mixed Use High Intensity – Industrial Shoreline Residential Building height1 15 N/A 35 35 35 45 No
limit
35
Building line setback in feet NA 10 – 15
Impervious surface cover –
maximum (%)2
NA 5% 20% 10% 20% 50% 100% 50%
Page 97 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 46
Use/Modification Aquatic Natural Urban Conservancy Public Flood Protection Recreation High Intensity – Mixed Use High Intensity – Industrial Shoreline Residential Riparian buffer width in feet2,
3, 4
NA Conserve
entire
area
75 50 50 5 50 50
Trail width in feet NA NA 20 feet or as required by Americans with
Disabilities Act regulations. Trails on
private properties and not open for
public use shall be up to five feet wide.
Notes:
1 According to PMC 29.15.020(1)(c).
2 Accompanied by storm water management measures/facilities, wetland protections and other protections as
applicable.
3 Measured from the OHWM or top of bank as applicable.
4 Except where roadway, paved trail, or parking area or other development that has eliminated or constrained
ecological functions encroaches, and then to the waterward edge of the facility maintenance area, as applicable.
NA = not applicable
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.210.]
29.15.030 Archaeological and historic resources.
(1) The City will coordinate with tribal, state and federal agencies that maintain inventories of
known significant historic, cultural and archaeological sites, and work with these agencies in the
permit review process in complying with state and federal regulations and laws to protect sites and
areas that have historic, cultural, and archaeological values. Existing policies also reinforce this
action, as written, so no additional changes planned.
(2) (1) In all developments, whenever an archaeological area or historic site is discovered by a
development in the shoreline area, the developer shall comply with applicable state and federal
laws and regulations.
(3) (2) Developers and property owners shall stop work immediately and notify the local
government, the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, and affected Indian tribes if
archaeological resources are uncovered during excavation.
Page 98 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 47
(4) (3) Permits issued in areas documented to contain archaeological resources shall require a site
inspection or evaluation by a professional archaeologist in coordination with affected Indian tribes.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.220.]
29.15.040 Environmental protection.
(1) All project proposals, including those for which a shoreline substantial development permit
is not required, shall comply with Chapter 43.21C RCW, the Washington State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA).
(2) Applicants shall apply the following mitigation sequencing steps in order of priority to avoid
or minimize significant adverse effects and significant ecological impacts (with (a) being top
priority):
(a) Avoid the adverse impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
(b) Minimize adverse impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its
implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or
reduce impacts;
(c) Rectify the adverse impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected
environment to the conditions existing at the time of the initiation of the project;
(d) Reduce or eliminate the adverse impact over time by preservation and maintenance
operations;
(e) Compensate for the adverse impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute
resources or environments; and
(f) Monitor the adverse impact and the compensation projects and take appropriate corrective
measures.
(3) Projects that cause significant adverse environmental impacts, as defined in WAC 197-11-
794 and PMC 29.05.070, Definitions, are not allowed unless mitigated according to subsection (2)
of this section, to avoid reduction or damage to ecosystem-wide processes and ecological
functions. As part of this analysis, the applicant shall evaluate whether the project may adversely
affect existing hydrologic connections between streams and wetlands and either modify the project
or mitigate any impacts as needed.
(4) When compensatory measures are appropriate pursuant to the mitigation priority sequence in
subsection (2) of this section, preferential consideration shall be given to measures that replace the
adversely impacted functions directly and in the immediate vicinity of the adverse impact.
However, alternative compensatory mitigation may be authorized within the affected drainage area
or watershed that addresses limiting factors or identified critical needs for shoreline resource
conservation based on watershed or resource management plans, including the shoreline
Page 99 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 48
restoration plan, applicable to the area of adverse impact. Authorization of compensatory
mitigation measures may require appropriate safeguards, terms, or conditions as necessary to
ensure no net loss of ecological functions.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.230.]
29.15.050 Shoreline vegetation conservation.
(1) Vegetation conservation standards shall not apply retroactively to existing uses and
developments. Vegetation associated with existing structures, uses, and developments may be
maintained within shoreline jurisdiction as stipulated in the approval documents for the
development.
(2) Regulations specifying establishment and management of shoreline buffers are located in the
Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas. Vegetation within shoreline buffers, other stream buffers, and
wetlands and wetland buffers shall be managed consistent with Chapter 29.25 PMC.
(3) Vegetation outside of shoreline buffers, other stream buffers, and wetlands and wetland
buffers and within shoreline jurisdiction shall be managed according to PMC 29.15.040,
Environmental protection, and any other regulations specific to vegetation management contained
in other sections of this SMP.
(4) Vegetation clearing outside of wetlands and wetland and stream buffers shall be limited to
the minimum necessary to accommodate approved shoreline development that is consistent with
all other provisions of this SMP. Mitigation sequencing per PMC 29.15.040, Environmental
protection, shall be applied so the design and location of the structure or development minimizes
native vegetation removal.
(5) Removal of noxious weeds and/or invasive species shall be incorporated in management and
mitigation plans, as necessary, to facilitate establishment of a stable community of native plants.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.240.]
29.15.060 Water quality, storm water, and nonpoint pollution.
(1) The location, design, construction, and management of all shoreline uses and activities shall
protect the quality and quantity of surface and groundwater adjacent to the site.
(2) When applicable, all shoreline development should comply with the requirements of the latest
version of Ecology’s Storm water Management Manual for Eastern Washington.
(3) Best management practices (BMPs) for control of erosion and sedimentation shall be
implemented for all shoreline development.
(4) Potentially harmful materials, including, but not limited to, oil, chemicals, tires, or hazardous
materials, shall not be allowed to enter any body of water or wetland, or to be discharged onto the
land. Potentially harmful materials shall be maintained in safe and leakproof containers.
Page 100 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 49
(5) Within 25 feet of a water body, herbicides, fungicides, fertilizers, and pesticides shall be
applied in strict conformance to the manufacturer’s recommendations and in accordance with
relevant state and federal laws. Further, pesticides subject to the final ruling in Washington Toxics
Coalition, et al., v. EPA shall not be applied within 60 feet for ground applications or within 300
feet for aerial applications of the subject water bodies and shall be applied by a qualified
professional in accordance with state and federal law.
(6) New development shall provide storm water management facilities designed, constructed, and
maintained in accordance with the latest version of Ecology’s Storm Water Management Manual
for Eastern Washington, including the use of BMPs. Additionally, new development shall
implement low-impact development techniques where feasible and necessary to fully implement
the core elements of the Surface Water Design Manual.
(7) For development activities with the potential for adverse impacts on water quality or quantity
in a stream or fish and wildlife habitat conservation area, a critical area report as prescribed in the
Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas, shall be prepared. Such reports should discuss the project’s
potential to exacerbate water quality parameters which are impaired, and for which total maximum
daily loads for that pollutant have been established, and prescribe any necessary mitigation and
monitoring.
(8) All materials that may come in contact with water shall be constructed of materials, such as
untreated wood, concrete, and approved plastic composites or steel, that will not adversely affect
water quality or aquatic plants or animals. Materials used for decking or other structural
components shall be approved by applicable state agencies for contact with water to avoid
discharge of pollutants from wave or boat wake splash, rain, or runoff. Wood treated with creosote,
copper chromium, arsenic, or pentachlorophenol is prohibited in shoreline water bodies.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.250.]
29.15.070 Public access.
(1) Applicants required to provide shoreline public access shall provide physical or visual access,
consistent with the City of Pasco’s public access plan and other agencies’ management plans when
applicable, unless specifically exempted in this section. Examples of physical and visual access
are listed below:
(a) Visual Access. Visual public access may consist of view corridors, viewpoints, or other
means of visual approach to public waters.
(b) Physical Access. Physical public access may consist of a dedication of land or easement
and a physical improvement in the form of a walkway, trail, bikeway, park, boat or canoe and
kayak launching ramp, dock area, view platform, or other area serving as a means of physical
approach to public waters.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, new uses shall provide for safe and
convenient public access to and along the shoreline where any of the following conditions are
present:
Page 101 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 50
(a) The development is proposed by a public entity or on public lands;
(b) The nature of the proposed use, activity, or development will likely result in an increased
demand for public access to the shoreline;
(c) The proposed use, activity, or development is not a water-oriented or other preferred
shoreline use, activity, or development under the SMA, such as a nonwater-oriented
commercial or recreational use;
(d) The proposed use, activity, or development may block or discourage the use of customary
and established public access paths, walkways, trails, or corridors;
(e) The proposed use, activity, or development will interfere with the public use, activity, and
enjoyment of shoreline areas or water bodies subject to the public trust doctrine;
(f) The proposed use, activity, or development includes key areas for public access
recommended in the City’s public access plan and/or shoreline restoration plan; or
(g) The proposed activity is a publicly financed shoreline erosion-control measure (when
feasible).
(3) An applicant shall not be required to provide public access where one or more of the following
conditions apply; provided, that such exceptions shall not be used to prevent implementing the
City’s public access plan and other agencies’ management plans. In determining the infeasibility,
undesirability, or incompatibility of public access in a given situation, the City shall consider
alternative methods of providing public access, such as off-site improvements, viewing platforms,
separation of uses through site planning and design, and restricting hours of public access:
(a) The proposed use, activity, or development only involves the construction of four or fewer
single-family or multifamily dwellings;
(b) The proposed use is within an area where public access is not proposed in the public access
plan, and the use will not increase public access demand or reduce public access;
(c) The proposed use is an agricultural activity;
(d) The nature of the use, activity, or development or the characteristics of the site make
public access requirements inappropriate due to health, safety (including consistency with
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design [CPTED] principles, where applicable), or
environmental hazards; the proponent shall carry the burden of demonstrating by substantial
evidence the existence of unavoidable or unmitigable threats or hazards to public health, safety,
or the environment that would be created or exacerbated by public access upon the site;
Page 102 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 51
(e) An existing, new, or expanded road or utility crossing through shoreline jurisdiction shall
not create the need for public access if the development being accessed or served by the road
or utility is located outside of shoreline jurisdiction;
(f) The proposed use, activity, or development has security requirements that are not feasible
to address through the application of alternative design features for public access, such as off-
site improvements, viewing platforms, and separation of uses through site planning and design;
(g) The economic cost of providing for public access at the site is unreasonably
disproportionate to the total long-term economic value of the proposed use, activity, or
development;
(h) Safe and convenient public access already exists in the general vicinity, and/or the public
access plan shows adequate public access at the property;
(i) Public access has reasonable potential to threaten or harm the natural functions and native
characteristics of the shoreline and/or is deemed detrimental to threatened or endangered
species under the Endangered Species Act; and
(j) The site is within or part of an overall development, a binding site plan, or a planned unit
development, which has previously provided public access adequate to serve the project in full
build-out through other application processes.
(4) Public access shall be located and designed to respect private property rights, be compatible
with the shoreline environment, protect ecological functions and processes, protect aesthetic values
of shoreline, and provide for public safety (including consistency with CPTED principles, where
applicable).
(5) For any development where public access is not required, shared community access may be
allowed if there is no existing or planned public access along the shoreline identified in the City
and other agencies’ plan. Where provided, community access shall be subject to all applicable
development standards of this section. Shared community access is not required when any of the
conditions under subsection (3) of this section applies.
(6) General Performance Standards.
(a) Uses, activities, and developments shall not interfere with the regular and established
public use.
(b) Shoreline substantial development or conditional uses shall minimize the impact on views
of shoreline water bodies from public land or substantial numbers of residences.
(c) Proponents shall include within their shoreline applications an evaluation of a proposed
use, activity, or development’s likely adverse impact on current public access and future
demands for access to the site. Such evaluation shall consider potential alternatives and
mitigation measures to further the policies of this SMP and the provisions of this section.
Page 103 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 52
(d) Public access easements, trails, walkways, corridors, and other facilities may encroach
upon any buffers or setbacks required in Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas, or under other
provisions of this SMP; provided, that such encroachment does not conflict with other policies
and regulations of this SMP, and no net loss of ecological function can be achieved. Any
encroachment into a buffer or setback must be as close to the landward edge of the buffer as
possible.
(e) Public access facilities shall accommodate persons with disabilities, unless determined
infeasible by the Shoreline Administrator.
(7) Trails and Levees.
(a) Existing improved and primitive public trails shall be maintained and enhanced.
(b) Shoreline in private ownership should provide public access when feasible as follows:
(i) Easement for public access; and
(ii) Physical or visual public access when feasible and when mentioned in the City’s
public access plan, or other agencies’ management plan.
(c) Where public access is to be provided by dedication of public access easements along the
OHWM, the minimum width of such easements shall be 20 feet.
(d) The total width of trail, including shoulders, shall be 20 feet maximum or as required by
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations.
(e) Pervious pavings are encouraged for all trails and are required for trail shoulders.
(f) Trails should make use of an existing constructed grade, such as those formed by an
abandoned rail grade, road, or utility when feasible.
(g) Trails shall be located, constructed, and maintained so as to avoid, to the maximum extent
possible, removal and other impacts to perennial native vegetation consistent with a habitat
management plan.
(h) Trails on private properties and not open for public use shall be up to five feet wide.
(8) Rights-of-Way, Easements, and Streets for Public Access.
(a) The City shall maintain public rights-of-way or easements as a means of retaining public
access on the shoreline. Proposed use, activity, or developments shall maintain public access
provided by public street ends, public utilities, and rights-of-way.
(b) The public easements required pursuant to this section, for the purpose of providing access
across or through the site to the OHWM, shall be maintained by the property owner to provide
for reasonable and safe public access to the OHWM.
Page 104 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 53
(9) Where public access routes terminate, connections should be made with the nearest public
street unless determined by the Shoreline Administrator to be infeasible. Public access facilities
required for an approved or permitted use, activity, or development shall be completed prior to
occupancy and use of the site or operation of the activity. Public access shall make adequate
provisions, such as screening, buffer strips, fences, and signs, to prevent trespass upon adjacent
properties and to protect the value and enjoyment of adjacent or nearby private properties and
natural areas.
(10) Off-site public access may be permitted by the City where it results in an equal or greater
public benefit than on-site public access, or when on-site limitations of security, environment,
compatibility, or feasibility are present. Off-site public access may include, but is not limited to,
adequate access on public lands in proximity to the site, opportunity to increase public lands and
access with adjoining or proximate public area, enhancing a City-designated public property (e.g.,
existing public recreation site, existing public access, road abutting a body of water, or similar) in
accordance with City standards, or other related measures.
(11) Signage.
(a) Signage to be approved by the Shoreline Administrator shall be conspicuously installed
along public access easements, trails, walkways, corridors, and other facilities to indicate the
public’s right of use and the hours of operation. Public access and interpretive displays may be
provided for publicly funded restoration projects where significant ecological impacts are
addressed. The proponent shall bear the responsibility for establishing and maintaining signs.
(b) The Shoreline Administrator may require the proponent to post signage restricting or
controlling the public’s access to specific shoreline areas. The proponent shall bear the
responsibility for establishing and maintaining such signage.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.260.]
29.15.080 Flood hazard reduction.
(1) Development in floodplains shall avoid significantly or cumulatively increasing flood
hazards. Development shall be consistent with this SMP, as well as applicable guidelines of FEMA
and PMC 29.25.060, Flood Hazard Areas, and Chapter 24.20 PMC, Provisions for Flood Hazard
Protection.
(2) Existing structural flood hazard reduction measures, such as levees, may be repaired and
maintained as necessary to protect legal uses on the landward side of such structures. Increases in
height of an existing levee, with any associated increase in width, that may be needed to prevent a
reduction in the authorized level of protection of existing legal structures and uses, shall be
considered an element of repair and maintenance.
(3) Flood hazard reduction measures shall not result in channelization of normal stream flows,
interfere with natural hydraulic processes, such as channel migration, or undermine existing
structures or downstream banks.
Page 105 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 54
(4) New Development and Subdivisions. Approve new development or subdivisions when it can
be reasonably foreseeable that the development or use would not require structural flood hazard
reduction measures within the floodway during the life of the development or use consistent with
the following (WAC 173-26-221(3)(c)(i)):
(a) Floodway. New development and subdivisions shall be subject to applicable floodway
regulations in PMC 29.25.060, Flood hazard areas, and Chapter 24.20 PMC, Provisions for
Flood Hazard Protection.
(5) New public and private structural flood hazard reduction measures shall be approved when a
scientific and engineering analysis demonstrates the following:
(a) They are necessary to protect existing development;
(b) Nonstructural measures, such as setbacks, land use controls, wetland restoration, dike
removal, use or structure removal or relocation, biotechnical measures, and storm water
management programs are not feasible;
(c) Adverse impacts on ecological functions and priority species and habitats can be
successfully mitigated so as to ensure no net loss; and
(d) Appropriate vegetation conservation actions are undertaken consistent with PMC
29.15.050, Shoreline vegetation conservation.
(6) Flood hazard reduction measures shall be placed landward of associated wetlands and
designated shoreline buffers, except for actions that increase ecological functions, such as wetland
restoration, or when no other alternative location to reduce flood hazard to existing development
is feasible as determined by the Shoreline Administrator.
(7) New public structural flood hazard reduction measures, such as levees, shall dedicate and
improve public access pathways, unless public access improvements would cause unavoidable
health or safety hazards to the public, inherent and unavoidable security problems, unacceptable
and unmitigable significant adverse ecological impacts, unavoidable conflict with the proposed
use, or a cost that is disproportionate and unreasonable to the total long-term cost of the
development.
(8) In those instances when management of vegetation as required by this SMP conflicts with
vegetation provisions included in state, federal, or other flood hazard agency documents governing
City-authorized, legal flood hazard reduction measures, the vegetation requirements of this SMP
will not apply. However, the applicant shall submit documentation of these conflicting provisions
with any shoreline permit applications and shall comply with all other provisions of this section
and this SMP that are not strictly prohibited by the approving flood hazard agency.
(9) The removal of gravel or other riverbed material for flood-management purposes shall be
consistent with the PMC 29.20.050, Dredging and dredge material disposal, and PMC 29.20.090,
Page 106 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 55
Mining, and be allowed only after a biological and physical conditions study shows extraction has
no effect on or provides a long-term benefit to flood hazard reduction, and does not result in a net
loss of ecological functions.
(10) Roads shall be located outside the floodway, except necessary crossings, which shall be
placed perpendicular to the water body as much as is physically feasible. New transportation
facilities shall be designed so the effective base flood storage volume of the floodplain is not
reduced. The applicant shall provide all necessary studies, reports, and engineering analyses,
which shall be subject to review and modification by the Shoreline Administrator. If proposed
transportation facilities effectively provide flood control, they shall comply with policies and
regulations of this section.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.270.]
Chapter 29.20
SHORELINE MODIFICATIONS AND USE REGULATIONS
Sections:
29.20.010 Agriculture.
29.20.020 Boating facilities.
29.20.030 Breakwater, jetties, groins, and weirs.
29.20.040 Commercial development.
29.20.050 Dredging and dredge material disposal.
29.20.060 Fill and excavation.
29.20.070 Industrial development.
29.20.080 In-stream structures.
29.20.090 Mining.
29.20.100 Piers and docks.
29.20.110 Recreational development.
29.20.120 Residential development.
29.20.130 Shoreline habitat and natural systems enhancement projects.
29.20.140 Shoreline stabilization.
29.20.150 Transportation –Trails, roads, and parking.
29.20.160 Utilities.
29.20.010 Agriculture.
(1) The SMP shall not require modification of or limit existing agricultural activities occurring
on agricultural lands consistent with RCW 90.58.065.
(2) For shoreline areas used for agriculture, new uses, activities, and development that are not
existing and ongoing, agriculture shall be subject to the following requirements:
(a) Such uses, activities, and development shall be allowed or permitted in a manner to ensure
maintenance of ecological functions and be consistent with the City’s land use plan.
Page 107 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 56
(b) If the new use, activity, or development is more intensive than the existing land use, no
significant vegetation removal, development, or grading shall occur in the shoreline buffer
without associated mitigation, except as necessary to accommodate low-intensity water-
dependent uses and public access that sustains ecological functions.
(c) New agricultural lands created by diking, draining, or filling wetlands shall not be allowed.
(d) Conversion of land for new agricultural use or activities that are not consistent with PMC
Title 25, Zoning, shall not be allowed.
(3) A substantial development permit shall be required for all agricultural developments not
specifically exempted by the provisions of PMC 29.35.080(4)(e) except for agricultural
developments in shoreline residential environment designation where a shoreline special use
permit shall be required.
(4) SMP provisions shall apply in the following cases:
(a) New agricultural activities on land not meeting the definition of agricultural land;
(b) Expansion of agricultural activities on nonagricultural lands;
(c) Conversion of agricultural lands to other uses;
(d) Other development on agricultural land that does not meet the definition of agricultural
activities; and
(e) Agricultural development and uses not specifically exempted by the SMA.
(5) New nonagricultural activities proposed on agricultural lands shall be consistent with the
environment designation and the Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix Table 29.15.010, as well
as other applicable shoreline use standards, including PMC 29.20.040, Commercial or PMC
29.20.120, Residential.
(6) Agricultural uses and development shall be located and designed to ensure no net loss of
ecological functions and no significant adverse impact on other shoreline resources and values.
(7) New feedlots are prohibited in shoreline areas.
(8) Agricultural uses and activities shall prevent and control erosion of soils and bank materials
within shoreline areas. They shall minimize siltation, turbidity, pollution, and other environmental
degradation of watercourses and wetlands.
(9) Agricultural chemicals shall be applied in a manner consistent with BMPs for agriculture and
PMC 29.15.060(5).
Page 108 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 57
(10) New agricultural activities shall not remove existing native or nonnative, vegetation, except
for noxious and invasive but nonnoxious, weed vegetation between all cropland or pasture areas
and adjacent waters or wetlands pursuant to the critical areas provisions of this SMP.
(11) Agricultural development shall conform to applicable state and federal policies and
regulations.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.300.]
29.20.020 Boating facilities.
(1) General Requirements.
(a) All boating uses, development, and facilities shall protect the rights of navigation.
(b) Boating facilities shall be sited and designed to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological
functions and shall meet Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WDNR)
requirements and other state guidance if located in or over state-owned aquatic lands.
(c) Boating facilities shall be located on stable shorelines in areas where:
(i) Such facilities will not adversely affect flood channel capacity or otherwise create a
flood hazard;
(ii) Water depths are adequate to minimize spoil disposal, filling, beach enhancement, and
other channel maintenance activities; and
(iii) Water depths are adequate to prevent the structure from grounding out at the lowest
low water or stoppers are installed to prevent grounding out.
(d) Boating facilities shall not be located:
(i) Where new dredging will be required; or
(ii) Where wave action caused by boating use would increase bank erosion rates, unless
no-wake zones are implemented at the facility.
(e) Boating uses and facilities shall be located far enough from public swimming beaches and
aquaculture harvest areas to alleviate any aesthetic or adverse impacts, safety concerns, and
potential use conflicts.
(f) In-water work shall be scheduled to protect biological productivity (including, but not
limited to, fish runs, spawning, and benthic productivity).
(g) Accessory uses at boating facilities shall be:
Page 109 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 58
(i) Limited to water-oriented uses, including uses that provide physical or visual shoreline
access for substantial numbers of the general public; and
(ii) Located as far landward as possible, while still serving their intended purposes.
(h) Parking and storage areas shall be landscaped or screened to provide visual and noise
buffering between adjacent dissimilar uses or scenic areas.
(i) Boating facilities shall locate where access roads are adequate to handle the traffic
generated by the facility and shall be designed so that lawfully existing or planned public
shoreline access is not unnecessarily blocked, obstructed, or made dangerous.
(j) Joint-use moorage with 10 or more berths is regulated under this section as a marina
(subsection (3) of this section). Joint-use moorage with fewer than 10 berths is regulated under
this section as a dock or pier (see PMC 29.20.100, Piers and Docks).
(k) All marinas and public launch facilities shall provide at least portable restroom facilities
for boaters’ use that are clean, well lit, safe, and convenient for public use.
(l) Installation of boat waste disposal facilities, such as pump-outs and portable dump stations,
shall be required at all marinas and shall be provided at public boat launches to the extent
possible. The locations of such facilities shall be considered on an individual basis in
consultation with the Washington State Departments of Health, Ecology, WDNR, Washington
State Parks, and WDFW, as necessary.
(m) All utilities shall be placed at or below dock levels or below ground, as appropriate.
(n) When appropriate, marinas and boat launch facilities shall install public safety signs that
include the locations of fueling facilities, pump-out facilities, and locations for proper waste
disposal.
(o) Boating facilities shall be constructed of materials that will not adversely affect water
quality or aquatic plants and animals over the long-term. Materials used for submerged
portions, decking, and other components that may come in contact with water shall be
approved by applicable state agencies for use in water to avoid discharge of pollutants from
wave splash, rain, or runoff. Wood treated with creosote, copper chromium, arsenic,
pentachlorophenol, or other similarly toxic materials is prohibited for use in moorage facilities.
(p) Boating facilities in waters providing a public drinking water supply shall be constructed
of untreated materials, such as untreated wood, approved plastic composites, concrete, or steel
(see PMC 29.15.060, Water quality, storm water, and nonpoint pollution).
(q) Vessels shall be restricted from extended mooring on waters of the state, except as allowed
by state regulations; and provided, that a lease or permission is obtained from the state and
impacts to navigation and public access are mitigated.
Page 110 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 59
(2) Boat Launch Facilities.
(a) Public boat launch facilities may be allowed in areas where no launching opportunities
exist within close proximity of a site (within less than three miles distance by road on a water
body) or as mentioned in the Public Access Plan.
(b) Boat launch and haul-out facilities, such as ramps, marine travel lifts and marine railways,
and minor accessory buildings, shall be designed and constructed in a manner that minimizes
adverse impacts on fluvial processes, biological functions, aquatic and riparian habitats, water
quality, navigation, and neighboring uses.
(c) Boat launch facilities shall be designed and constructed using methods/technology that
has been recognized and approved by state and federal resource agencies as the best currently
available.
(3) Marinas.
(a) Marinas shall be designed to:
(i) Provide flushing of all enclosed water areas;
(ii) Allow the free movement of aquatic life in shallow water areas; and
(iii) Avoid and minimize any interference with geohydraulic processes and disruption of
existing shore forms.
(b) Open pile or floating breakwater designs shall be used unless it can be demonstrated that
riprap or other solid construction would not result in any greater net impacts to shoreline
ecological functions, processes, fish passage, or shore features.
(c) Wet-moorage marinas shall locate a safe distance from domestic sewage or industrial
waste outfalls.
(d) To the maximum extent possible, marinas and accessory uses shall share parking facilities.
(e) New marina development shall provide public access amenities, such as viewpoints,
interpretive displays, and public access to accessory water-enjoyment uses (e.g., restaurants).
(f) If a marina is to include gas and oil handling facilities, such facilities shall be separate
from main centers of activity in order to minimize the fire and water pollution hazards and to
facilitate fire and pollution control. Marinas shall have adequate facilities and procedures for
fuel handling and storage, and the containment, recovery, and mitigation of spilled petroleum,
sewage, and other potentially harmful or hazardous materials and toxic products.
(g) The marina operator shall be responsible for the collection and dumping of sewage, solid
waste, and petroleum waste.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.320.]
Page 111 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 60
29.20.030 Breakwater, jetties, groins, and weirs.
(1) Breakwaters shall be allowed in environments defined in Table 29.15.010, Shoreline Use and
Modification Matrix, with a shoreline special use permit.
(2) New, expanded, or replacement groins and weirs shall only be permitted if the applicant
demonstrates that the proposed groin or weir will not result in a net loss of shoreline ecological
functions and the structure is necessary for water-dependent uses, public access, shoreline
stabilization, or other specific public purposes.
(3) Groins and weirs shall require a special use permit, except when such structures are installed
to protect or restore ecological functions, such as installation of groins that may eliminate or
minimize the need for hard shoreline stabilization.
(4) Groins and weirs shall be located, designed, constructed, and operated consistent with
mitigation sequencing principles, including avoiding critical areas, as provided in PMC 29.15.040,
Environmental protection.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.330.]
29.20.040 Commercial development.
(1) Water-dependent commercial development shall be given priority over nonwater-dependent
commercial uses within shoreline environments. Secondarily, water-related and water-oriented
uses shall be given priority over nonwater-oriented commercial uses.
(2) Nonwater-oriented commercial uses shall be allowed if they can demonstrate at least one or
more of the following:
(a) The commercial use is part of a mixed-use project that includes water-dependent uses and
provides a significant public benefit with respect to the objectives of the SMA.
(b) Navigability is severely limited at the proposed site, including opportunities for
nonmotorized boating or other water-oriented uses.
(c) The commercial use is physically separated from the shoreline by another property, public
right-of-way, or levee.
(d) The commercial use is farther upland than 200 feet from the OHWM; therefore, a water-
oriented use is not a viable option.
(3) Nonwater-oriented uses, including, but not limited to, residential uses, may be located with
water-oriented commercial uses; provided, that:
(a) The mixed-use project includes one or more water-dependent uses.
(b) Water-dependent commercial uses, as well as other water-oriented commercial uses, have
preferential locations along the shoreline.
Page 112 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 61
(c) The underlying zoning district permits residential uses together with commercial uses.
(d) Public access is provided and/or ecological restoration is provided as a public benefit.
(4) Review Criteria. The City shall utilize the following information in its review of all
commercial development applications:
(a) Whether there is a water-oriented aspect of the proposed commercial use or activity when
it is located within 200 feet of the OHWM;
(b) Whether the proposed commercial use is consistent with the Shoreline Use and
Modification Matrix (Table 29.15.010);
(c) Whether the application has the ability to enhance compatibility with the shoreline
environment and adjacent uses;
(d) Whether adequate provisions are made for public and private visual and physical shoreline
access; and
(e) Whether the application makes adequate provisions to prevent adverse environmental
impacts and provide for shoreline ecological or critical area mitigation, where appropriate.
(5) Commercial development shall be designed and maintained in a manner compatible with the
character and features of surrounding areas. Developments are encouraged to incorporate low-
impact development techniques into new and existing projects and integrate architectural and
landscape elements that recognize the river and lake environments. The City may prescribe and
modify project dimensions, screening standards, setbacks, or operation intensities to achieve this
purpose.
(6) Eating and drinking facilities and lodging facilities shall be oriented to provide views to the
waterfront, when such view is available from the site.
(7) Commercial uses shall provide for public access as a condition of approval, unless such public
access is demonstrated by the proponent to be infeasible or inappropriate for the shoreline pursuant
to PMC 29.15.070, Public access.
(8) Commercial uses shall provide for suitable measures to rehabilitate and enhance the shoreline
ecology as a condition of approval.
(9) Nonwater-oriented commercial uses shall not be allowed over water in any shoreline
environment.
(10) All commercial loading and service areas shall be located upland or away from the shoreline.
Provisions shall be made to screen such areas with walls, fences, and landscaping and to minimize
aesthetic impacts.
Page 113 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 62
(11) The storage of potentially hazardous or dangerous substances or wastes is prohibited in the
floodway or within 200 feet of the OHWM, whichever boundary extends farthest landward.
(12) Development shall be located, designed, and constructed in a manner that ensures no net loss
of shoreline ecological functions and without significant adverse impacts on other preferred land
uses and public access features.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.340.]
29.20.050 Dredging and dredge material disposal.
(1) Dredging.
(a) New dredging shall be permitted only where it is demonstrated that the proposed water-
dependent or water-related uses will not result in significant or ongoing adverse impacts to
water quality, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and other critical areas, flood holding
capacity, natural drainage and water circulation patterns, significant plant communities, prime
agricultural land, and public access to shorelines, unless one or more of these impacts cannot
be avoided. When such impacts are unavoidable, they shall be minimized and mitigated such
that they result in no net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
(b) Dredging and dredge disposal shall be prohibited on or in archaeological sites that are
listed on the National Register of Historic Places and the Washington Heritage Register until
such time that they have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate agency.
(c) Dredging techniques that cause minimum dispersal and broadcast of bottom material shall
be used, and only the amount of dredging necessary shall be permitted.
(d) Dredging shall be permitted only:
(i) For navigation or navigational access;
(ii) In conjunction with a water-dependent use of water bodies or adjacent shoreline areas;
(iii) As part of an approved habitat improvement project;
(iv) To improve water flow or water quality; provided, that all dredged material shall be
contained and managed so as to prevent it from re-entering the water; or
(v) In conjunction with a bridge, navigational structure, or wastewater treatment facility
for which there is a documented public need and where other feasible sites or routes do not
exist.
(e) Dredging for fill is prohibited except where the material is necessary for restoration of
shoreline ecological functions.
Page 114 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 63
(2) Dredge Material Disposal.
(a) Upland dredge material disposal within shoreline jurisdiction is discouraged. In the limited
circumstances when it is allowed, it will be permitted under the following conditions:
(i) Shoreline ecological functions and processes will be preserved, restored, or enhanced,
including protection of surface and groundwater;
(ii) Erosion, sedimentation, floodwaters, or runoff will not increase adverse impacts on
shoreline ecological functions and processes or property; and
(iii) The site will ultimately be suitable for a use allowed by this SMP.
(b) Dredge material disposal shall not occur in wetlands, except as authorized by special use
permit as part of a shoreline restoration project.
(c) Dredge material disposal within areas assigned an aquatic environment designation may
be approved only when authorized by applicable agencies, which may include the USACE
pursuant to Section 404 (Clean Water Act) permits, WDFW’s hydraulic project approval,
and/or the dredged material management program of the WDNR; and when one of the
following conditions apply:
(i) Land disposal is infeasible, less consistent with this SMP, or prohibited by law; or
(ii) Disposal as part of a program to restore or enhance shoreline ecological functions and
processes is not feasible.
(d) Dredge materials approved for disposal within areas assigned an Aquatic environment
designation shall comply with the following conditions:
(i) Aquatic habitat will be protected, restored, or enhanced;
(ii) Adverse effects on water quality or biologic resources from contaminated materials
will be mitigated;
(iii) Shifting and dispersal of dredge material will be minimal; and
(iv) Water quality will not be adversely affected.
(e) When required by the Shoreline Administrator, revegetation of land disposal sites shall
occur as soon as feasible in order to retard wind and water erosion and to restore the wildlife
habitat value of the site. Native species shall be used in the revegetation.
(f) Dredge material disposal operating periods and hours shall be limited to those stipulated
by the WDFW and hours from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, except in time
of emergency as authorized by the Shoreline Administrator. Provisions for buffers at land
Page 115 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 64
disposal or transfer sites, in order to protect public safety and other lawful interests and to avoid
adverse impacts, shall be required.
(3) Submittal Requirements. The following information shall be required for all dredging
applications:
(a) A description of the purpose of the proposed dredging and analysis of compliance with
the policies and regulations of this SMP.
(b) A detailed description of the existing physical character, shoreline geomorphology, and
biological resources provided by the area proposed to be dredged, including:
(i) A site plan map outlining the perimeter of the proposed dredge area, including the
existing bathymetry (water depths that indicate the topography of areas below the OHWM),
and having data points at a minimum of two-foot depth increments.
(ii) A critical areas detailed study according to PMC 29.25.020(10).
(iii) A mitigation plan, if necessary, to address any identified adverse impacts on
ecological functions or processes.
(iv) Information on stability of areas adjacent to proposed dredging and spoils disposal
areas.
(v) A detailed description of the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the
dredge materials to be removed, including:
(A) Physical analysis of material to be dredged (e.g., material composition and
amount, grain size, organic materials present, and source of material).
(B) Chemical analysis of material to be dredged (e.g., volatile solids, chemical oxygen
demand, grease and oil content, and mercury, lead, and zinc content).
(C) Biological analysis of material to be dredged.
(c) A description of the method of materials removal, including facilities for settlement
and movement.
(d) Dredging procedure, including the length of time it will take to complete dredging,
method of dredging, and amount of materials removed.
(e) Frequency and quantity of project maintenance dredging.
(f) Detailed plans for dredge spoil disposal, including specific land disposal sites and
relevant information on the disposal site, including, but not limited to:
Page 116 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 65
(i) Dredge material disposal area;
(ii) Physical characteristics, including location, topography, existing drainage
patterns, and surface and groundwater;
(iii) Size and capacity of disposal site;
(iv) Means of transportation to the disposal site;
(v) Proposed dewatering and stabilization of dredged material;
(vi) Methods of controlling erosion and sedimentation; and
(vii) Future use of the site and conformance with land use policies and regulations.
(g) Total estimated initial dredge volume.
(h) Plan for disposal of maintenance spoils for at least a 20-year period, if applicable.
(i) Hydraulic modeling studies sufficient to identify existing geohydraulic patterns and
probable effects of dredging.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.350.]
29.20.060 Fill and excavation.
(1) Fill and excavation waterward of the OHWM, except to support ecological restoration,
requires a special use permit and may be permitted only when:
(a) In conjunction with water-dependent or public access uses allowed by this SMP;
(b) In conjunction with a bridge, levee, or transportation facility of statewide significance, for
which there is a demonstrated public need and where no feasible upland sites, design solutions,
or routes exist;
(c) In conjunction with implementation of an interagency environmental cleanup plan to clean
up and dispose of contaminated sediments;
(d) Disposal of dredged material considered suitable under, and conducted in accordance
with, the Washington State Dredged Material Management Program; or
(e) In conjunction with any other environmental restoration or enhancement project.
(2) Waterward of the OHWM, pile or pier supports shall be utilized whenever feasible in
preference to fills. Fills for approved road development in floodways or wetlands shall be
permitted only if pile or pier supports are proven not feasible.
Page 117 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 66
(3) Fill upland and waterward of the OHWM, including in nonwatered side channels, shall be
permitted only where it is demonstrated that the proposed action will not:
(a) Result in significant ecological damage to water quality, fish, and/or wildlife habitat;
(b) Adversely alter natural drainage and circulation patterns, currents, or river flows, or
significantly reduce flood water capacities;
(c) Alter geomorphic or hydrologic processes; and
(d) Significantly reduce public access to the shoreline or significantly interfere with shoreline
recreational uses.
(4) Fills are prohibited in the floodway, except when approved by special use permit and where
required in conjunction with uses allowed by this SMP.
(5) Fills are allowed in floodplains outside of the floodway only where they would not alter the
hydrologic characteristics or flood storage capacity, or inhibit channel migration that would, in
turn, increase flood hazard or other damage to life or property and are consistent with FEMA
standards and Chapter 24.20 PMC, Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection, and PMC 29.25.060,
Flood hazard areas.
(6) Fill shall be of the minimum amount and extent necessary to accomplish the purpose of the
fill.
(7) Excavation waterward of the OHWM or within wetlands shall be considered dredging for
purposes of this SMP.
(8) Fills or excavation shall not be located where shore stabilization will be necessary to protect
materials placed or removed. Disturbed areas shall be immediately stabilized and revegetated, as
applicable.
(9) Fills, beach development or nourishment, and excavation shall be designed to blend physically
and visually with existing topography whenever possible, so as not to interfere with long-term
appropriate use, including lawful access and enjoyment of scenery.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.360.]
29.20.070 Industrial development.
(1) Water-dependent industrial development shall be given priority over nonwater-dependent
commercial uses within shoreline environments. Secondarily, water-related and water-oriented
uses shall be given priority over nonwater-oriented commercial uses.
(2) Nonwater-oriented industrial uses shall be allowed if they can demonstrate one or more of the
following:
Page 118 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 67
(a) The industrial use is part of a mixed-use project that includes water-dependent uses and
provides a significant public benefit with respect to the objectives of the SMA.
(b) Navigability is severely limited at the proposed site, including opportunities for
nonmotorized boating or other water-oriented uses.
(c) The industrial use is physically separated from the shoreline by another property, public
right-of-way, or levee.
(d) The industrial use is farther upland than 200 feet from the OHWM; therefore, a water-
oriented use is not a viable option.
(3) Where industrial use is proposed for location on land in public ownership, public access
should be required unless such public access is demonstrated by the proponent to be infeasible or
inappropriate for the shoreline pursuant to PMC 29.15.070, Public access.
(4) Industrial uses shall provide for suitable measures to rehabilitate and enhance the shoreline
ecology as a condition of approval.
(5) Nonwater-oriented industrial uses shall not be allowed over water in any shoreline
environment.
(6) All industrial loading and service areas shall be located upland or away from the shoreline,
except when loading services are water-dependent, such as barge facilities. Provisions shall be
made to screen upland loading areas with walls, fences, and landscaping and to minimize aesthetic
impacts.
(7) The new storage of potentially hazardous or dangerous substances or wastes is prohibited in
the floodway or within 200 feet of the OHWM, whichever boundary extends farthest landward.
(8) Industrial development will be located, designed, or constructed in a manner that ensures no
net loss of shoreline ecological functions and such that it does not have significant adverse impacts
to other shoreline resources and values.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.370.]
29.20.080 In-stream structures.
(1) In-stream structures are those structures placed by humans within a stream or river waterward
of the OHWM that either cause or have the potential to cause water impoundment or the diversion,
obstruction, or modification of water flow. In-stream structures may include those for
hydroelectric generation, irrigation, water supply, flood control, transportation, utility service
transmission, structures primarily intended for fisheries management, or other purposes. Docks,
piers, and marinas are not regulated as in-stream structures in this section. See PMC 29.20.150,
Transportation – Trails, roads, and parking, and PMC 29.20.160, Utilities, for regulations
governing road and utility crossings of streams.
(2) General.
Page 119 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 68
(a) The location, planning, and design of in-stream structures shall be compatible with the
following:
(i) The full range of public interests; existing agricultural activities; water diversion
operations, maintenance, and facility upgrade activities; and providing for public access to
shoreline waters, desire for protection from floods, and need for preservation of historic
and cultural resources.
(ii) Protection and preservation of ecosystem-wide processes and ecological functions,
including, but not limited to, fish and wildlife, with special emphasis on protecting and
restoring priority habitats and species and water resources and hydrogeological processes
within the context of the hydrology and water management effects of the Columbia and
Snake river operations and McNary Pool conditions, as applicable.
(b) New structures shall be designed, located, and constructed consistent with mitigation
sequencing principles in PMC 29.15.040, Environmental protection, and as otherwise limited
by floodplain regulations found in PMC 29.15.080, Flood hazard reduction, and PMC
29.25.060, Flood hazard areas.
(c) New structures shall be designed and located to minimize removal of riparian vegetation
and, if applicable, to return flow to the stream in as short a distance as possible.
(d) In-stream structures shall provide for adequate upstream and downstream migration of
resident fish, as applicable, and shall not adversely affect salmonid fish species or adversely
modify salmonid fish habitat, as applicable.
(e) Utilities and transmission lines shall be located so as to minimize obstruction or
degradation of views and comply with applicable provisions of PMC 29.20.160, Utilities.
(f) Mitigation shall be required of the proponent for the loss of ecological functions and
processes pursuant to PMC 29.15.040, Environmental protection, and Chapter 29.25 PMC,
Critical Areas. No net loss in function, value, or acreage shall occur from such development.
(3) Submittal Requirements. In addition to the standard requirements listed in PMC 29.35.040,
Application requirements, all permit applications for in-stream structures shall contain, at a
minimum, the following additional information:
(a) A site suitability analysis, which provides sufficient justification for the proposed site; the
analysis must fully address alternative sites for the proposed development.
(b) Proposed location and design of primary and accessory structures, transmission
equipment, utility corridors, and access/service roads.
Page 120 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 69
(c) A plan that describes the extent and location of vegetation which is proposed to be
removed to accommodate the proposed facility, and any site revegetation plans required by
this SMP.
(d) A hydraulic analysis prepared by a licensed professional engineer that sufficiently
describes the project’s effects on streamway hydraulics, including potential increases in base
flood elevation, changes in stream velocity, and the potential for redirection of the normal flow
of the affected stream.
(e) A hydrologic analysis that analyzes the project’s effects on ecological processes, including
delivery and rate of water and sediment, geomorphology, and recruitment of organic material.
(f) Biological resource inventory and analysis that sufficiently describes the project’s effects
on fish and wildlife resources, prepared by a qualified professional as defined in Chapter 29.25
PMC, Critical Areas.
(g) Provision for erosion control, protection of water quality, and protection of fish and
wildlife resources during construction.
(h) Long-term management plans that describe in sufficient detail the provisions for
protection of in-stream resources during construction and operation; the plan shall include
means for monitoring its success.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.380.]
29.20.090 Mining.
(1) Mining shall be prohibited waterward of the OHWM.
(2) Mining facilities shall be located within shoreline jurisdiction only when no feasible sites are
available outside shoreline jurisdiction and only after the applicant has demonstrated compliance
with the mitigation sequencing requirements of PMC 29.15.040, Environmental Protection.
(3) Mining in shoreline jurisdiction shall only be approved when the material proposed to be
extracted is only available in a shoreline location. This determination shall be based on an
evaluation of geologic factors, such as the distribution and availability of mineral resources for
that jurisdiction, the need for such mineral resources, and economic, transportation, and land use
factors. This demonstration may rely on analysis or studies prepared for purposes of the
Comprehensive Plan’s designations and may be integrated with any relevant environmental review
conducted under SEPA, Chapter 43.21C RCW, or otherwise be shown in a manner consistent with
RCW 90.58.100(1) and WAC 173-26-201(2)(a), as amended.
(4) Mining facilities and associated activities shall be designed and located to prevent loss of
ecological function.
(5) Application for permits for mining operations shall be accompanied by operation plans,
reclamation plans, and analysis of environmental impacts sufficient to make a determination as to
Page 121 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 70
whether the project will result in net loss of shoreline ecological functions and processes during
the course of mining and after reclamation, and how impacts will be mitigated to achieve no net
loss of these functions. Creation, restoration, or enhancement of habitat for priority species and
the future productivity of the site may be considered in determining no net loss of ecological
functions.
(6) Mining proposals must be coordinated and compliant with state Surface Mining Reclamation
Act requirements (Chapter 78.44 RCW, Chapter 332-18 WAC).
(7) Preference shall be given to mining uses that result in the creation, restoration, or enhancement
of habitat for priority species. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.390.]
29.20.100 Piers and docks.
(1) All boating uses, development, and facilities shall protect the rights of navigation and
demonstrate no net loss of ecological functions, including providing on-site and off-site mitigation,
as applicable.
(2) Shared moorage serving single-family use consisting of docks and piers with more than four
berths, commercial moorage available to the general public, and moorage related to clubs or other
groups not associated with a particular residential development are regulated as boating facilities
under PMC 29.20.020, Boating facilities.
(3) Docks and piers with four or fewer berths or any number of mooring buoys are regulated
under this section.
(4) Piers and docks shall avoid:
(a) Areas where shoreline modification is required for approach and other upland facilities.
(b) Locations where they would adversely impact upland riparian or nearshore habitat for
aquatic species.
(c) Locations where they would adversely affect flood channel capacity or create a flood
hazard.
(d) Locations where water depths for vessels are not adequate without dredging.
(5) Piers and docks, except those accessory to single-family residences, shall provide public
access in accordance with PMC 29.15.070, Public access, and shall be located and designed such
that existing public access to public shorelines is not obstructed nor made hazardous.
(6) All in- and overwater structures shall be constructed of materials that will not adversely affect
water quality or aquatic plants and animals during the long-term. Wood treated with creosote,
pentachlorophenol, or other similarly toxic materials is prohibited. Docks shall be constructed of
untreated materials, such as untreated wood, approved plastic composites, concrete, or steel.
Page 122 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 71
(7) Vessels shall be restricted from extended mooring on waters of the state, except as allowed
by state regulations and unless a lease or other permission is obtained from the state and impacts
to navigation and public access are mitigated.
(8) Boat Launches.
(a) Boat launches accessory to single-family and multifamily residential uses are prohibited.
(b) Private boat launches shall be allowed only for water-dependent uses and marinas and
only when it is demonstrated that public boat launches will not feasibly serve the use. Rail and
track systems shall be preferred over concrete ramps.
(c) New public boat launches for general public use or expansion of public boat launches by
adding launch lanes shall demonstrate that:
(i) Water depths are adequate to avoid the need for dredging and eliminate or minimize
potential loss of shoreline ecological functions or other shoreline resources from offshore
or foreshore channel dredging.
(ii) Adjacent residential properties will not be adversely affected by adverse proximity
impacts, such as noise, light and glare, or scale and aesthetic impacts. Fencing or landscape
areas may be required to provide a visual screen.
(iii) Exterior lighting will not adversely impact aquatic species.
(iv) Adequate provisions are made for restroom, sewage, and solid waste disposal
facilities in compliance with applicable health regulations.
(v) Access and parking shall not produce traffic hazards, shall not result in excessive noise
or other impacts, shall minimize traffic impacts on nearby streets, and shall include
adequate parking for boat trailers. Parking on public streets may be allowed for peak
periods if it is demonstrated that such parking will not adversely impact through traffic or
residential uses.
(9) New moorage to serve a single-family residence may be allowed only if:
(a) It is consistent with the USACE McNary Pool Management Plan.
(b) An applicant demonstrates that existing facilities (boat launches and public and private
marinas) are not reasonably available to meet demand.
(c) The lot does not have access to shared moorage in an existing subdivision, and there is no
homeowners association or other corporate entity capable of developing shared moorage.
Page 123 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 72
(d) In cases where a new dock or pier is approved, the City may require an agreement to share
with nearby residences with water frontage and provide for expansion to serve such additional
users.
(10) A dock or pier serving a single-family residence shall meet the following standards:
(a) Piers and Ramps.
(i) To prevent damage to shallow-water habitat, piers and ramps shall extend at least 40
feet perpendicular from the OHWM. In some instances and sites, it may not be practical to
extend a ramp 40 feet from OHWM (for instance, where this could conflict with
navigation). The City may grant exceptions on a case-by-case basis depending on
documentation of specific limitations that exist and in coordination with other permitting
agencies.
(ii) Piers and ramps shall be no more than four feet in width.
(iii) The bottom of either the pier or landward edge of the ramp shall be elevated at least
two feet above the plane of OHWM.
(iv) Grating shall cover the entire surface area (100 percent) of the pier or ramp. The open
area of grating shall be at least 50 percent, as rated by the manufacturer.
(v) Skirting shall not be placed on piers, ramps, or floats. Protective bumper material will
be allowed along the outside edge of the float, as long as the material does not extend below
the bottom edge of the float frame or impede light penetration.
(vi) Shoreline concrete anchors must be placed at least 10 feet landward from the OHWM
and shall be sized no larger than four feet wide by four feet long, unless otherwise approved
by the City, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries,
USACE, and WDFW. The maximum anchor height shall be only what is necessary to
elevate the bottom of either the pier or landward edge of the ramp at least two feet above
the plane of OHWM. The intent of this criterion is to limit impacts to riparian vegetation
along the shoreline. The City may grant exceptions from the 10-foot landward requirement
if site conditions warrant. Exceptions shall be made on a case-by-case basis and based on
documentation of a specific limitation that exists and in coordination with other permitting
agencies.
(b) Preservatives.
(i) The dock shall be built with materials that do not leach preservatives or other materials.
(ii) No treated wood of any kind shall be used on any overwater structure (float, pier, or
ramp).
Page 124 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 73
(iii) No paint, stain, or preservative shall be applied to the overwater structure.
(c) General.
(i) No electricity shall be provided to, or on, the overwater structure.
(ii) No boat lifts or watercraft lifts (e.g., Jet Ski lifts) of any type will be placed on, or in
addition to, the overwater structure. The City may grant exceptions on a case-by-case basis
in coordination with other permitting agencies if the applicant can demonstrate that the
proposed boat lift meets the intent of the criteria to minimize structure, maximize light
penetration, and maximize depth. However, these structures must meet the size criteria of
the plan (total 160 square feet).
(iii) Shoreline armoring (e.g., bulkheads, riprap, and retaining walls) shall not occur in
association with installation of the overwater structure.
(iv) Construction of the overwater structure shall be completed during the in-water work
window (November 1st to February 28th).
(d) Piling and Float Anchors.
(i) Piling shall not exceed eight inches in diameter. The intent of this criterion is not to
require existing pilings to be removed, cut, or capped, but to place limits on the size of new
pilings. The City may grant exceptions to allow for larger pilings on a case-by-case basis
and in coordination with other permitting agencies in areas where safety considerations
merit it.
(ii) Pilings shall be spaced at least 18 feet apart on the same side of any component of the
overwater structure. The pier/ramp and float are separate components.
(iii) Each overwater structure shall utilize no more than four piles total for the entire
project. A combination of two piles and four helical anchors may be used in place of four
piles.
(iv) All pilings shall be fitted with devices to prevent perching by piscivorous (fish-eating)
birds.
(v) Submerged float anchors will be constructed from concrete and shall be horizontally
compressed in form, by a factor of five or more, for a minimum profile above the stream
bed (the horizontal length and width will be at least five times the vertical height). A helical
screw anchor may be utilized where substrate allows. The owner shall be responsible for
demonstrating feasibility and for proper installation such that anchor displacement does
not occur.
(vi) No in-water fill material will be allowed, with the exception of pilings and float
anchors. (Note: uncured concrete or its by-products shall not be allowed.)
Page 125 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 74
(e) Floats.
(i) Float components shall not exceed the dimensions of eight by 20 feet, or an aggregate
total of 160 square feet, for all float components.
(ii) Flotation materials shall be permanently encapsulated to prevent breakup into small
pieces and dispersal in water (e.g., rectangular float tubs).
(iii) Grating shall cover 100 percent of the surface area of the float(s). The open area of
the grating shall be no less than 50 percent, as rated by the manufacturer.
(iv) Functional grating will cover no less than 50 percent of the float.
(v) Floats shall not be located in shallow-water habitat where they could ground or impede
the passage or rearing of any salmonid life stage.
(vi) Nothing shall be placed on the overwater structure that will reduce natural light
penetration through the structure.
(vii) Floats shall be positioned at least 40 feet horizontally from the OHWM and no more
than 100 feet from the OHWM, as measured from the landward-most edge of the float.
Adjustments to this requirement may be made on an individual basis where strict
compliance with this standard may present safety issues or be excessive for site conditions.
(viii) Project construction shall cease during high-flow conditions that could result in
inundation of the project area, except for efforts to avoid or minimize resource damage.
(11) Shared residential docks and piers shall generally meet the standards for single-family docks
above, except that the number of floats and the size of piers and other facilities may be increased
to serve additional slips to provide one moorage space per residence served.
(12) Docks and piers shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from side property lines, except that
joint-use facilities may be located closer to, or upon, a side property line when agreed to by contract
or covenant with the owners of the affected properties. This agreement shall be recorded with the
County Auditor and a copy filed with the shoreline permit application.
(13) Moorage Related to Subdivisions.
(a) New subdivisions and short plats shall contain a restriction on the face of the plat
prohibiting individual docks. A site for community or shared moorage shall be designated on
the plat and owned in undivided interest by property owners within the subdivision. Shared
moorage facilities shall be available to lots with water frontage in the subdivision. The
overwater area of the dock shall be made available to other lots and the public for community
access and may be required to provide public access depending on the scale of the facility.
Page 126 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 75
(b) Approval of a shared moorage for a subdivision shall be subject to the following criteria:
(i) There is no reasonably available public or private moorage that can serve the moorage
needs of the residences or the subdivision.
(ii) Shared moorage to serve new development shall be limited to the amount of moorage
needed to serve lots with water frontage. One moorage space per lot may not be presumed.
(iii) The size of a dock must consider the use of mooring buoys for some or all moorage
needs and the use of all or part of the dock to allow tender access to mooring buoys.
(iv) Public access shall be provided in all shared docks utilizing public aquatic lands that
accommodate five or more vessels.
(c) If a community or shared dock is not developed at the time of subdivision, a community
association shall be established with the authority to levy assessments within the subdivision
to construct and maintain a community dock in the future. The failure of a subdivision to
develop a community or shared dock shall not affect the prohibition on individual docks.
(14) Multifamily residences, hotels, motels, and other commercial developments proposing to
provide moorage facilities shall meet the criteria for a marina. Use of the moorage must be open
to the general public on the same basis as residents or occupants and shall provide public access.
If approved, no more than one joint use moorage facility may be provided for a parcel or
development.
(15) Applications for docks or piers serving single commercial or industrial enterprises shall
demonstrate that:
(a) The facility serves a water-dependent use;
(b) The facility is the minimum size required to serve the proposed use; provided, that
provisions for expansion or future joint use may be provided;
(c) The facility minimizes impacts to the extent feasible. Where impacts are unavoidable, the
facility mitigates impacts to navigation, aquatic habitat, upland habitat, public access to the
water for recreation, fishing and similar use, and public access to publicly accessible lands
below the OHWM.
(16) Commercial or industrial moorage facilities shall demonstrate that:
(a) The dock or pier shall be the minimum length required to serve the use.
(b) Access from the shore to piers or floats shall minimize water cover in order to minimize
impacts to shallow-water habitat.
(c) Piers and ramps shall be elevated to provide the maximum feasible light penetration.
Page 127 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 76
(d) Grating, or clear translucent material, shall be utilized to the maximum extent feasible to
provide light penetration.
(e) Floats shall be constructed and attached so they do not ground out on the substrate.
(f) Pile spacing shall be the maximum feasible to minimize shading and avoid a wall effect
that would block or baffle wave patterns, currents, littoral drift, or movement of aquatic life
forms, or result in structure damage from driftwood impact or entrapment.
(g) Pile diameter shall be minimized while meeting structural requirements.
(h) Covered structures may be permitted only to serve a water-dependent use where it is
demonstrated that adequate upland sites are not feasible and the area covered is the minimum
necessary to serve the use.
(17) Barge terminals are a particular use that can include docks, piers, and industrial moorage.
These facilities must demonstrate those items as provided in subsection (16) of this section, but
the SMP recognizes that barge terminals require specific development regulations, including
hardening of the shoreline, dredging, and no setback areas.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.400.]
29.20.110 Recreational development.
(1) General Preferences.
(a) Recreational uses and facilities shall include features that relate to access, enjoyment, and
use of the City’s shorelines.
(b) Both passive and active shoreline recreation uses are allowed.
(c) Water-oriented recreational uses and activities are preferred in shoreline jurisdiction.
Water-dependent recreational uses shall be preferred as a first priority and water-related and
water-enjoyment recreational uses as a second priority.
(d) Existing passive recreational opportunities, including nature appreciation, nonmotorized
trails, public education regarding shoreline ecological functions and processes, environmental
interpretation, and native habitat protection, shall be maintained. Opportunities incorporating
educational and interpretive information shall be included in design and operation of recreation
facilities and nature trails when feasible.
(e) Preference shall be given to the development and enhancement of public access to the
shoreline to increase fishing, boating, and other water-relatedenjoyment recreational
opportunities.
(2) General Performance Standards.
(a) The potential adverse impacts of all recreational uses shall be mitigated, and adequate
provisions for shoreline rehabilitation shall be made part of any proposed recreational use or
development to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological function.
(b) Sites with fragile and unique shoreline conditions, such as high-quality wetlands and
wildlife habitats, shall be used only for nonintensive recreation activities, such as trails,
viewpoints, interpretive signage, and similar passive and low-impact facilities that result in no
Page 128 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 77
net loss of shoreline ecological function, and do not require the construction and placement of
permanent structures.
(c) For proposed recreation developments that require the use of fertilizers, pesticides, or
other toxic chemicals, the proponent shall specify the BMPs to be used to prevent these
applications and resultant leachate from entering adjacent waters.
(d) Recreational developments shall be located and designed to preserve, enhance, or create
scenic views and vistas.
(e) In approving shoreline recreational developments, the Shoreline Administrator shall
ensure that the development will maintain, enhance, or restore desirable shoreline features,
including unique and fragile areas, scenic views, and aesthetic values. The Shoreline
Administrator may, therefore, adjust or prescribe project dimensions, on-site location of
project components, intensity of use, screening, lighting, parking, and setback requirements.
(3) Signs indicating the public’s right to access shoreline areas shall be installed and maintained
in conspicuous locations at all points of access.
(4) Recreational developments shall provide facilities for nonmotorized access to the shoreline,
such as pedestrian and bicycle paths, and equestrian access, as applicable. New motorized vehicle
access shall be located and managed to protect riparian, wetlands, and shrub-steppe habitat
functions and value.
(5) Proposals for recreational developments shall include a landscape plan indicating how native,
self-sustaining vegetation is incorporated into the proposal to maintain ecological functions. The
removal of on-site native vegetation shall be limited to the minimum necessary for the
development of permitted structures or facilities and shall be consistent with provisions of PMC
29.15.050, Shoreline vegetation conservation, and Chapter 29.25 PMC, Critical Areas.
(6) Accessory uses and support facilities, such as maintenance facilities, utilities, and other
nonwater-oriented uses shall be consolidated and located in upland areas outside shoreline,
wetland, and riparian buffers unless such facilities, utilities, and uses are allowed in shoreline
buffers based on the regulations of this SMP.
(7) The placement of picnic tables, playground apparatus, and other similar minor components
within the floodways shall be permitted; provided, that such structures are located and installed in
such a manner as to prevent them from being swept away during a flood event.
(8) Recreational facilities shall make adequate provisions, such as screening, landscaping buffer
strips, fences, and signs, to prevent trespass on adjacent properties and to protect the value and
enjoyment of adjacent or nearby private properties and natural areas, as applicable.
(9) Recreational facilities or structures are only allowed to be built over water when they provide
public access or facilitate a water-dependent use and shall be the minimum size necessary to
accommodate the permitted activity.
(10) Recreational developments shall make adequate provisions for:
(a) On-site and off-site access and, where appropriate, equestrian access;
(b) Appropriate water supply and waste disposal methods; and
(c) Security and fire protection.
(11) Structures associated with recreational development shall not exceed 35 feet in height,
except as noted in PMC 29.15.020, Development standards, when such structures document that
the height above 35 feet will not obstruct the view of a substantial number of adjoining residences.
(12) Recreational development shall minimize effective impervious surfaces in shoreline
jurisdiction and incorporate low-impact development techniques. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970
§ 29.01.410.]
Page 129 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 78
29.20.120 Residential development.
(1) Single-family residential development is a preferred use when it is developed in a manner
consistent with SMP provisions.
(2) Residential development shall be located and constructed to result in no net loss of shoreline
ecological function.
(3) Lots for residential use shall have a maximum density consistent with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations.
(4) Accessory uses and structures shall be located outside of the riparian buffer, unless the
structure is or supports a water-dependent use. Storage structures to support water-related uses are
not water-dependent uses, and therefore, shall be located outside of the riparian buffer.
(5) All residential development shall be located or designed in such a manner as to prevent
measurable degradation of water quality from storm water runoff. Adequate mitigation measures
shall be required and implemented where there is the reasonable potential for such adverse effect
on water quality.
(6) New shoreline residences and appurtenant structures shall be sufficiently set back from steep
slopes and shorelines vulnerable to erosion so that structural improvements, including bluff walls
and other shoreline stabilization and flood control structures, are not necessary to protect proposed
residences and associated uses.
(7) New floating residences and overwater residential structures shall be prohibited in shoreline
jurisdiction.
(8) New, multi-unit residential development and the subdivision of land into five or more lots
shall make adequate provisions for public access consistent with the regulations set forth in PMC
29.15.070, Public access.
(9) New residential development shall connect with sewer systems, as required by the PMC.
(10) All new residential development shall meet the vegetation management provisions contained
in PMC 29.15.050, Shoreline vegetation conservation, and PMC 29.25.040, Fish and wildlife
habitat conservation areas.
(11) Residential development clustering may be required by the Shoreline Administrator where
appropriate to minimize ecological and visual impacts on shorelines, including minimization of
impacts on shoreline vegetation consistent with PMC 29.15.050, Shoreline vegetation
conservation. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.420.]
29.20.130 Shoreline habitat and natural systems enhancement projects.
(1) Shoreline restoration and enhancement activities designed to restore or enhance shoreline
ecological functions and processes and/or shoreline features should be targeted toward meeting
the needs of sensitive and/or regionally important plant, fish, and wildlife species, and shall be
given priority.
(2) Shoreline restoration, enhancement, and mitigation activities designed to create dynamic and
sustainable ecosystems to assist the City in achieving no net loss of shoreline ecological functions
are preferred.
(3) Restoration activities shall be carried out in accordance with an approved shoreline restoration
plan and in accordance with the provisions of this SMP.
(4) To the extent possible, restoration, enhancement, and mitigation activities shall be integrated
and coordinated with other parallel natural resource management efforts, such as those identified
in the shoreline restoration plan.
Page 130 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 79
(5) Habitat creation, expansion, restoration, and enhancement projects may be permitted subject
to required state or federal permits when the applicant has demonstrated that:
(a) The primary objective is clearly restoration or enhancement of the natural character or
ecological function of the shoreline;
(b) The project will not adversely impact spawning, nesting, or breeding in fish and wildlife
habitat conservation areas;
(c) Upstream or downstream properties or fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas will
not be adversely affected;
(d) Water quality will not be degraded;
(e) Flood storage capacity will not be degraded;
(f) Impacts to critical areas and buffers will be avoided and where unavoidable, minimized
and mitigated; and
(g) The project will not interfere with the normal public use of the navigable waters of the
state. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.430.]
29.20.140 Shoreline stabilization.
(1) Shoreline restoration and enhancement activities designed to restore shoreline ecological
functions and processes and/or shoreline features should be targeted toward meeting the needs of
sensitive and/or regionally important plant, fish, and wildlife species, and shall be given priority.
(2) New shoreline stabilization for new development is prohibited unless it can be demonstrated
that reasonable use of a lot or parcel legally created prior to the effective date of this SMP is
precluded without shore protection or is necessary to restore ecological functions or hazardous
substance remediation.
(3) Proposed designs for new or expanded shoreline stabilization shall be designed in accordance
with applicable state guidelines, must use the most current scientific and technical information
available, must document that alternative solutions are not feasible or do not provide sufficient
protection, must demonstrate that future stabilization measures would not be required on the
project site or adjacent properties, and be certified by a qualified professional.
(4) Land subdivisions and lot line adjustments shall be designed to ensure that future development
of the newly created lots will not require structural stabilization for subsequent development to
occur.
(5) New or expanded structural shoreline stabilization is prohibited except when necessity is
demonstrated consistent with the requirements of WAC 173-26-231(3). Necessity is demonstrated
through conclusive evidence documented by a geotechnical analysis that there is a significant
possibility that the structure will be damaged within three years as a result of shoreline erosion
caused by wind/wave action or other hydraulic forces and only when significant adverse impacts
are mitigated to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and/or processes.
(6) Replacement of an existing shoreline stabilization structure with a similar structure is
permitted if there is a demonstrated need to protect existing primary uses, structures or public
facilities, including roads, bridges, railways, irrigation and utility systems from erosion caused by
stream undercutting or wave action. The existing shoreline stabilization structure will be removed
from the shoreline as part of the replacement activity. Replacement walls or bulkheads shall not
encroach waterward of the OHWM or existing structure unless the facility was occupied prior to
January 1, 1992, and there are overriding safety or environmental concerns. Proposed designs for
new or expanded shore stabilization shall be in accordance with applicable state guidelines and
certified by a qualified professional.
Page 131 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 80
(7) Where a geotechnical analysis confirms a need to prevent potential damage to a primary
structure, but the need is not as immediate as three years, the analysis may still be used to justify
more immediate authorization for shoreline stabilization using bioengineering approaches.
(8) Shoreline stabilization projects that are part of a fish habitat enhancement project meeting the
criteria of RCW 77.55.181 will be authorized through a shoreline exemption. Stabilization projects
that are not part of such a fish enhancement project will be regulated by this SMP.
(9) Small-scale shoreline stabilization projects (e.g., tree-planting projects or other minimally
intrusive enhancements) shall be reviewed by a qualified professional to ensure that the project
has been designed using the most current scientific and technical information available.
(10) Large-scale or more complex shoreline stabilization projects (e.g., projects requiring fill or
excavation, placing objects in the water, or hardening the bank) shall be designed by a qualified
professional using the most current scientific and technical information available. The applicant
may be required to have a qualified professional oversee construction or construct the project.
(11) New stabilization structures, when found to be necessary, will implement the following
standards:
(a) Limit the size of the project to the minimum amount necessary;
(b) Include measures to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions; and
(c) Use biotechnical bank stabilization techniques unless those are demonstrated to be
infeasible or ineffective before implementing “hard” structural stabilization measures. [Ord.
4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.440.]
29.20.150 Transportation –Trails, roads, and parking.
(1) New or expanded motor vehicle and rail transportation facilities shall not be located within
shoreline jurisdiction, unless:
(a) The proponent demonstrates that no feasible upland alternatives exist;
(b) The project represents the minimum development necessary to serve another specific,
localized, and permitted shoreline use; or
(c) In the case of a water crossing, the proponent demonstrates that the project is necessary to
further a substantial public interest.
(2) When new roads or road expansions are unavoidable in shoreline jurisdiction, proposed
transportation facilities shall be planned, located, and designed to achieve the following:
(a) Meet mitigation sequencing provisions of PMC 29.15.040, Environmental protection;
(b) Avoid adverse impacts on existing or planned water-oriented uses;
(c) Set back from the OHWM to allow for a usable shoreline area for vegetation conservation
and any preferred shoreline uses unless infeasible;
(d) Minimize grading, vegetation clearing, and alterations of the natural topography; and
(e) Use BMPs for preventing erosion and degradation of surface water quality.
(3) Improvements to existing motor vehicle and rail transportation facilities shall not interfere
with pedestrian and bicycle access and shall, whenever possible, provide for expansion and
enhancement of pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities.
(4) Transportation facilities and services for motor vehicles and rail shall utilize existing
transportation corridors whenever possible.
(5) The development, improvement, and expansion of pedestrian and bicycle transportation
facilities are allowed within all environments. Such transportation facilities are a preferred use
wherever they are compatible with the natural character, resources, and ecology of the shoreline.
Page 132 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 81
(6) Pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities shall be designed, located, and constructed
consistent with the policies and regulations for public access as provided in PMC 29.15.070, Public
access. Linkage among shoreline parks, recreation areas, and public access points is encouraged,
when feasible.
(7) Parking facilities are not a water-dependent use and shall only be permitted in the shoreline
jurisdiction to support an authorized use where it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the
Shoreline Administrator that there are no feasible alternative locations away from the shoreline.
Parking as a primary use shall not be allowed within 50 feet of edge of riparian vegetation corridor.
Accessory parking facilities shall be subject to the same permit type as the primary use.
(8) Accessory parking facilities shall be planned to avoid or minimize adverse effects on unique
or fragile shoreline features and shall not result in a net loss of shoreline ecological functions or
adversely affect existing or planned water-dependent uses. Parking facilities shall be located
upland of the principal structure, building, or development they serve, and preferably outside of
shoreline jurisdiction, except:
(a) Where the proponent demonstrates that an alternate location would reduce adverse
impacts on the shoreline and adjacent uses;
(b) Where another location is not feasible; and/or
(c) Except when ADA standards require otherwise.
(d) In such cases, the applicant shall demonstrate use of measures to reduce adverse impacts
of parking facilities in shoreline jurisdiction, such as low-impact development techniques,
buffering, or other measures approved by the Shoreline Administrator.
(9) Parking facilities shall be landscaped in a manner to minimize adverse visual and aesthetic
impacts on adjacent shoreline and abutting properties.
(10) All forms of transportation facilities shall, wherever feasible, consolidate water crossings
and make joint use of rights-of-way with existing or planned future primary utility facilities and
other transportation facility modalities.
(11) Improvements to all existing transportation facilities shall provide for the reestablishment
and enhancement of natural vegetation along the shoreline when appropriate.
(12) If located in the side yard or waterward side of a structure, loading areas shall be screened
from view of pedestrians on either side of the waterway. The visual screen shall comprise a fence
or wall with trees and shrubs consistent with the City’s landscape standards.
(13) Shoreline crossings and culverts shall be designed to minimize adverse impacts on riparian
and aquatic habitat and shall allow for fish passage. See PMC 29.25.040, Fish and wildlife habitat
areas, for regulations governing crossings of nonshoreline streams located in shoreline jurisdiction.
(14) Trails shall be designed consistent with public access requirements in PMC 29.15.070,
Public access. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.450.]
29.20.160 Utilities.
(1) Nonwater-oriented utility production and processing facilities and transmission facilities are
permitted in shoreline jurisdiction only if no practical upland alternative or location exists. New
primary utility production and processing facilities or parts of those facilities, such as power plants,
solid waste storage, or disposal facilities that are nonwater-oriented, should not be permitted within
shoreline jurisdiction unless no other options are feasible.
(2) The principal uses permitted by this section include sewage collection, holding, transfer and
treatment pipelines, tanks, structures, containment facilities, and buildings. Water diversion,
Page 133 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 82
treatment and conveyance facilities are also considered principal uses. Accessory facilities are also
permitted, including, but not limited to:
(a) Plant monitoring and control facilities and on-site administrative offices;
(b) Plant access and logistical facilities, such as storage areas and material handling ramps
and facilities, including utility delivery (electrical and communication) facilities;
(c) Plant security and safety features, such as fences and signage; and
(d) Other accessory or auxiliary uses or features, necessary to effective and efficient operation
of the plant, which cannot feasibly be located outside the shoreline jurisdiction.
(3) Expansion of existing primary utility facilities within shoreline jurisdiction must demonstrate:
(a) The expansion is designed to protect adjacent shorelands from erosion, pollution, or other
environmentally detrimental factors during and after construction.
(b) The project is planned to fit existing natural topography as much as practical and avoid
alteration of the existing natural environment.
(c) Debris, overburden, and other construction waste materials shall be disposed of so as to
prevent erosion or pollution of a water body.
(4) New primary utility facilities and expansions shall include provisions to control the quantity
and quality of surface water runoff to natural water bodies, using BMPs to retain natural flow rates.
A maintenance program to ensure continued proper functioning of such new facilities shall be
required.
(5) Applications for installation of utility facilities other than water-dependent facilities within
the high intensity environment designation shall include the following:
(a) Reason why the utility facility must be in shoreline jurisdiction;
(b) Alternative locations considered and reasons for their elimination;
(c) Location of the same, similar, or other utility facilities in the vicinity of the proposed
project;
(d) Proposed method(s) of construction;
(e) Plans for reclamation of areas to be disturbed during construction;
(f) Landscape plans;
(g) Methods to achieve no net loss of ecological function and minimize clearing of native
vegetation; and
(h) Consistency with the City’s plans for utilities, where such plans exist.
(6) Applications for installation of utility facilities shall include the following:
(a) Proposed method(s) of construction;
(b) Plans for reclamation of areas to be disturbed during construction;
(c) Landscape plans; and
(d) Methods to achieve no net loss of ecological function and minimize clearing of native
vegetation.
(7) Where feasible, utilities shall be consolidated within a single easement and utilize existing
rights-of-way. Any utility located within property owned by the utility, which must of necessity
cross shoreline jurisdiction, shall be designed and operated to reserve the option of general public
recreational usage of the right-of-way in the future. This option shall be exercised by the public
only where:
(a) The public will not be exposed to dangers from the utility equipment; and
(b) The utility itself will not be subjected to unusual risks of damage by the public.
(8) In areas where utilities must cross shoreline jurisdiction, they shall do so by the most direct
route feasible, unless such a route would negatively affect an environmentally critical area,
Page 134 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 83
obstruct public access to the shoreline, or interfere with the navigability of a water body regulated
by this SMP. See PMC 29.25.040, Fish and wildlife habitat areas, for regulations governing
crossings of nonshoreline streams located in shoreline jurisdiction.
(9) Utility facilities shall be designed and located in a manner that protects scenic views and
minimizes adverse aesthetic impacts.
(10) New utilities, which must be constructed across shoreline jurisdiction in previously
undisturbed areas, must submit a mitigation plan demonstrating the restoration of the shoreline to
at least its existing condition. Upon completion of utility installation or maintenance, any disturbed
areas shall be regraded to be compatible with the natural terrain of the area and revegetated with
appropriate native plants to prevent erosion.
(11) Outside of the high intensity environment designations, all underwater pipelines or those
paralleling the waterway transporting liquids potentially injurious to aquatic life or water quality
shall be prohibited, unless no other alternative exists to serve a public interest. In those limited
instances where permitted, shutoff valves shall be provided at both sides of the water body except
for public sanitary sewers of a gravity or siphon nature. In all cases, no net loss of ecological
functions shall be maintained.
(12) Where utilities cannot cross a shoreline water body via a bridge or other existing water
crossing, the utilities shall evaluate site-specific habitat conditions and demonstrate whether
impacts can mitigated to negatively impact substrate, or whether utilities will need to be bored
beneath the water body such that the substrate is not disturbed. Construction of pipelines placed
under aquatic areas shall be placed in a sleeve to avoid the need for excavation in the event of a
failure in the future.
(13) Minor trenching to allow the installation of necessary underground pipes or cables is allowed
if no alternative, including boring, is feasible, and if:
(a) Impacts on fish and wildlife habitat are avoided to the maximum extent possible.
(b) The utility installation shall not increase or decrease the natural rate, extent, or opportunity
of channel migration.
(c) Appropriate BMPs are employed to prevent water quality impacts or other environmental
degradation.
(14) Utility installation and maintenance operations shall be conducted in a manner that does not
negatively affect surface water quality or quantity. Applications for new utility projects in
shoreline jurisdiction shall include a list of BMPs to protect water quality. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016;
Code 1970 § 29.01.460.]
Chapter 29.25
CRITICAL AREAS
Sections:
29.25.010 Critical areas.
29.25.020 General provisions.
29.25.030 Wetlands.
29.25.040 Fish and wildlife habitat.
29.25.050 Aquifer recharge areas.
29.25.060 Flood hazard areas.
29.25.070 Geologic hazard areas.
Page 135 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 84
29.25.010 Critical areas.
(1) Purpose.
(a) The purpose of this chapter, critical areas, is to conserve and protect the values and
functions of environmentally sensitive and hazardous areas which contribute to public health,
safety, and welfare of the community without violating any citizen’s constitutional rights to
the use of property as required by the GMA of 1990 (Chapter 17, Laws of 1990) and the SMA
(Chapter 90.58 RCW) through the application of the most current scientific and technical
information available.
(b) The City shall regulate in shoreline jurisdiction all uses, activities, and development
within, adjacent to, or likely to affect one or more critical areas.
(2) Critical Areas. Critical areas of concern to the City of Pasco within the shoreline jurisdiction
include:
(a) Wetlands;
(b) Fish and wildlife habitats;
(c) Aquifer recharge areas;
(d) Flood hazard areas; and
(e) Geologically hazardous areas, such as those subject to landslide and steep slope failures,
erosion, seismic events, mine collapse, and volcanic hazards.
(3) Critical Area Categories. The City finds that these critical areas fall into one or both of the
following categories:
(a) Critical areas provide a variety of valuable and beneficial biological and physical functions
that benefit the City and its residents; and
(b) Critical areas pose potential threats to human safety or to public and private property.
(4) Intent. The intent of this chapter is to implement the provisions of the GMA, SMA, and the
Comprehensive Plan by managing development in harmony with critical areas. This chapter seeks
to:
(a) Protect members of the public and public resources and facilities from injury, loss of life,
or property damage due to landslides and steep slope failures, erosion, seismic events, volcanic
eruptions, or flooding;
(b) Protect unique, fragile and valuable elements of the environment, including fish and
wildlife and their habitats;
(c) Mitigate unavoidable impacts to environmentally sensitive areas by regulating alterations
in and adjacent to critical areas;
(d) Prevent cumulative adverse environmental impacts to water quality and wetlands;
(e) Meet the requirements of the Washington GMA (Chapter 36.70A RCW), and SMA
(Chapter 90.58 RCW) with regard to the protection of critical area lands;
(f) Coordinate environmental review and permitting of proposals to avoid duplication and
delay of desirable actions.
(5) Most Current Scientific and Technical Information.
(a) WAC 173.26.201(2)(a) requires the City to identify and assemble the most current,
accurate, and complete scientific and technical information available regarding the
development of policies related to identification of and policies governing management
recommendations for critical areas.
(b) Critical area reports, mitigation plans, and decisions to permit the alteration of critical
areas within the shoreline jurisdiction shall rely on the most current scientific and technical
Page 136 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 85
information to ensure the protection of the ecological functions and values of critical areas,
and must give special consideration to conservation or protection measures necessary to
preserve or enhance anadromous fish and their habitat.
(c) The most current scientific and technical information that is consistent with criteria
established in WAC 173.26.201(2)(a) may include the following:
(i) Critical area maps;
(ii) Maps and reference documents in the City of Pasco’s Inventory, Characterization, and
Analysis Report, as applicable;
(iii) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle maps, including
Washington Department of Natural Resources Geologic Information Portal2;
(iv) Aerial photographs;
(v) Soil Survey of Franklin County, Washington, by the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Soil Conservation Service;
(vi) National Wetland Inventory maps; and
(vii) WDFW Priority Habitats and Species maps. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970
§ 29.01.500.]
29.25.020 General provisions.
(1) Authorizations Required. Prior to fulfilling the requirements of this chapter, the City shall not
grant any approval or permission to alter the condition of any land, water or vegetation, or to
construct or alter any structure or improvement including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Building permit;
(b) Special use permit;
(c) Shoreline special use permit;
(d) Shoreline substantial development permit;
(e) Shoreline variance permit;
(f) Binding site plan;
(g) Short subdivision;
(h) Subdivision;
(i) Zoning variance permit;
(j) Rezone; or
(k) Any other adopted permit or required approval not expressly exempted by this section.
(2) Jurisdiction.
(a) This chapter shall apply to all lands, all land uses and development and all structures and
facilities in City’s shoreline jurisdiction. This chapter shall apply to every person, individual,
firm, partnership, corporation, governmental agency or other entity that owns, leases, or
administers land within the City’s shoreline jurisdiction.
(b) This section provides regulations for land use and development in and adjacent to critical
areas within the City’s shoreline jurisdiction.
(3) Allowed uses.
(a) All allowed activities shall use reasonable methods supported by the most current
scientific and technical information or accepted BMPs with the least amount of potential
impact to the critical areas. Any incidental damage to or alteration of a critical area that is not
a necessary outcome of the exempted activity shall be restored, rehabilitated, or replaced at the
responsible party’s expense. This includes, but is not limited to, access ways or paths,
vegetation removal or damage beyond a reasonable work zone, and grading and clearing not
Page 137 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 86
essential to the ongoing operation of the site’s use. Uses allowed under this section do not give
permission to destroy a critical area or ignore risk from natural hazards. See PMC 29.35.080,
Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permits, for provisions for exempted
activities within shoreline jurisdiction. Allowed uses include:
(i) Modification of any existing structure that does not alter the structure to further intrude
into a critical area or established buffer and does not increase risk to life and property.
Modification includes construction of tenant improvements, fences, decks, patios,
driveways, signs, and accessory structures.
(ii) Operation and maintenance of any system of existing dikes, levees, ditches, drains, or
other facilities which were created, developed or utilized primarily as a part of a drainage
or diking system. Operation and maintenance does not necessarily include the expansion
or new construction of drainage ditches and related facilities. See PMC 29.35.080,
Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permits, for additional provisions that
may be applicable.
(iii) Removal of hazardous trees and vegetation and, when necessary, measures to control
or prevent a fire or halt the spread of disease or damaging insects consistent with the State
Forest Practices Act, Chapter 76.09 RCW; provided, that no vegetation shall be removed
from a critical area or its buffer without approval from the City.
(iv) Activities involving artificially created wetlands or streams intentionally created from
nonwetland sites, including, but not limited to: grass-lined swales, irrigation and drainage
ditches, detention facilities, and landscape features, except those features that provide
critical habitat for anadromous fish and those features that were created as mitigation for
projects or alterations subject to the provisions of this chapter.
(v) Passive recreational activities, including, but not limited to, fishing, bird watching,
boating, swimming, hiking, and use of nature trails, provided the activity does not alter the
critical area or its buffer.
(vi) The harvesting of wild crops in a manner that is not injurious to natural reproduction
of such crops and provided the harvesting does not require tilling soil, planting crops, or
changing existing topography, water conditions or water sources.
(vii) Educational and scientific research.
(viii) Existing and ongoing agricultural activities and related development activities,
provided no alteration of flood storage capacity or conveyance, or increase in the extent or
nature of impact to a critical area or its buffer occurs, beyond that which has occurred prior
to the effective date of this chapter.
(b) If the proposed activity meets any of the listed allowed uses, including any BMP and/or
restoration requirements, completion of a critical area checklist or further critical area review
is not required.
(4) Critical Area Review.
(a) The City of Pasco shall complete a critical area review prior to granting any shoreline
permit approval for a development or other alteration on a site that is found to likely include,
or be adjacent to, or have significant impact upon one or more critical areas, unless otherwise
provided in this chapter. As part of this review, the Shoreline Administrator shall verify the
information submitted by the applicant, and:
(i) Confirm the extent, nature, and type of any critical areas identified and evaluate any
required critical area detailed study;
Page 138 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 87
(ii) Determine whether the development proposal conforms to the purposes and
performance standards of this chapter;
(iii) Assess impacts on the critical area from the activities and uses proposed and
determine whether any proposed alterations to, or impacts upon, critical areas are necessary
and unavoidable in order to meet the objectives of the proposal; and
(iv) Determine if any required mitigation plans proposed by the applicant are sufficient to
protect the critical area and public health, safety, and welfare concerns consistent with the
goals, purposes, objectives, and requirements of this chapter.
(b) The applicant shall be responsible for the initiation, preparation, submission, and expense
of all required assessments, studies, plans, reconnaissance, and other work in support of the
application. The applicant shall provide the City with digital copies and paper copies of
reports/studies and maps prepared for the reports/studies, including all geotechnical studies
and mapping.
(5) Minimum Standards. Any proposed activity shall be conditioned as necessary to mitigate
impacts to critical areas to ensure no net loss of ecological function and conform to the
performance standards required by this chapter and PMC 29.15.040, Environmental protection.
(6) Concurrent Requirements. Lands characterized by one or more critical area features may also
be subject to other regulations established by this chapter due to overlap or multiple functions of
some critical areas. In the event of conflict between regulations, the most restrictive regulations
shall apply.
(7) Critical Area Checklist.
(a) For any proposed activity not found to be exempt under subsection (3) of this section or
PMC 29.35.080, Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permits, the applicant
shall complete a critical area checklist on forms provided by the City. The checklist must be
submitted to the Shoreline Administrator prior to consideration of any permit request that
requires a critical area review as described in this section.
(b) Following receipt of the checklist, the Shoreline Administrator will conduct a review to
determine whether there are any critical area indicators present that may be impacted by the
proposal.
(8) Initial Determination.
(a) If the Shoreline Administrator determines the site potentially includes, or is adjacent to
critical areas, or the proposed project could have significant adverse impacts on critical areas,
the Shoreline Administrator shall notify the applicant that a critical area detailed study is
required for each of the indicated critical area types.
(b) If the review of the checklist and critical area resources do not indicate that critical areas
are included or adjacent to the activity, or could suffer probable significant adverse impacts
from the activity, then the Shoreline Administrator shall rule that the critical area review is
complete. The determination shall be noted on the checklist.
(c) The applicant shall acknowledge in writing that a determination regarding the apparent
absence of one or more critical areas by the Shoreline Administrator is not intended to be an
expert certification regarding the presence of critical areas and the determination is subject to
possible reconsideration and reopening if new information is received. If the applicant wants
greater assurance of the accuracy of the critical area review determination, the applicant may
hire a qualified consultant professional to provide, such assurances.
(9) Waivers from Critical Area Detailed Study Requirements.
Page 139 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 88
(a) The Shoreline Administrator may waive the requirement for a critical area detailed study
if there is substantial evidence that:
(i) There will be no alteration of the critical areas or required buffer;
(ii) The development proposal will not impact the critical area in a manner contrary to the
purpose, intent and requirements of this chapter; and
(iii) The performance standards required by this chapter will be met.
(b) In making the determination, the Shoreline Administrator may use any of the most current
scientific information and the critical area reference maps and/or inventories identified in PMC
29.25.010(5).
(c) Notice of the findings substantiating the waiver will be attached to the permit and filed
with the application records.
(10) Critical Area Detailed Studies.
(a) Preliminary Reconnaissance. If a critical area detailed study is determined to be necessary,
then a data review and field reconnaissance shall be performed by a qualified consultant
professional for that type of critical area. If the detailed study reveals no critical area is present,
then a statement of this finding along with supporting evidence shall be prepared by the
consultant professional and submitted to the City. An approved finding of the lack of a critical
area shall satisfy all of the requirements for a detailed study.
(b) Minimum Requirements. If the data review and field reconnaissance reveals that a critical
area is present, then a complete detailed study shall be prepared by the applicant and submitted
to the City. At a minimum, a critical area detailed study shall comply with the specific criteria
in PMC 29.25.030 through PMC 29.25.070, and clearly document:
(i) The boundary and extent of the critical area;
(ii) The existing function, value, and/or hazard associated with the critical area;
(iii) The probable impact upon the function, value, and/or hazard associated with the
critical area from the project as proposed; and
(iv) A mitigation plan including the items in subsection (13) of this section.
(c) Limitations to Study Area. If the applicant, together with assistance from the City, cannot
obtain permission for access to properties adjacent to the project area, then the critical area
detailed study may be limited accordingly.
(d) Preparation and Determination of Completeness. The critical area detailed study shall be
prepared by a qualified consultant professional for the type of critical area or areas involved.
The qualified consultant professional may consult with the Shoreline Administrator prior to or
during preparation of the critical area detailed study to obtain City approval of modifications
to the contents of the study where, in the judgment of the qualified consultant professional,
more or less information is required to adequately address the critical area impacts and required
mitigation.
If the critical area detailed study is found to be incomplete, the applicant shall be notified and
the critical area review process shall be suspended pending correction of the inadequacies.
Upon receipt of a complete critical area detailed study a final determination is to be rendered.
(11) Final Determination. Following submission of a completed detailed study, the Shoreline
Administrator will review the detailed study and make a determination, based on the critical area
detailed study and any other available and appropriate materials. The Shoreline Administrator’s
determination will address the adequacy of the project, as proposed, to mitigate any effects it may
have on critical areas that are included within or adjacent to the project site. The Shoreline
Administrator may elect to request assistance from state resource agency staff if necessary. In
Page 140 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 89
addition, the Shoreline Administrator will assess the adequacy of the project proposal’s
compliance with the applicable performance standards and this SMP. Notice of this determination
shall be attached to the permit and the critical area review shall be completed.
(a) Favorable Determination. A determination that the project proposal adequately mitigates
its impacts on the critical areas and complies with the applicable performance standards
satisfies the provisions of this title only. It should not be construed as endorsement or approval
of the original or any subsequent permit applications.
(b) Unfavorable Determination. When a project proposal is found to not adequately mitigate
its impacts on the critical areas and/or not comply with applicable performance standards, the
Shoreline Administrator shall prepare written notice of the reasons for the finding of
noncompliance. Such notice shall identify the critical area impacted and the nature of the
impact.
Following notice of a determination from the critical area review that the proposed activity
does not adequately mitigate its impacts on the critical areas and/or does not comply with
applicable performance standards, the applicant may request consideration of a revised
mitigation plan. If the revision is found to be substantial and relevant to the critical area review,
the Shoreline Administrator may reopen the critical area review and make a new determination
based on this revised mitigation plan.
(12) Completion of the Critical Area Review. If at any time prior to completion of the public input
process on associated permits or approvals, the City receives new evidence that a critical area may
be included in, adjacent to, or significantly impacted by the proposed activity, then the City shall
reopen the critical area review process and shall require whatever level of critical area review and
mitigation as indicated by the evidence. Once the public input process on all associated permits or
approvals is completed and the record is closed, then the City’s determination regarding critical
areas shall be final, unless appeal is filed as per PMC 29.35.120, Appeals.
(13) Mitigation Standards.
(a) All proposed critical area alterations shall include mitigation sufficient to maintain the
function and values of the critical area or to prevent risk from a hazard posed by a critical area.
Mitigation of one critical area impact should not result in unmitigated impacts to another
critical area. Mitigation includes avoiding, minimizing, or compensating for adverse impacts
to critical areas or their buffers. The preferred sequence of mitigation is defined in PMC
29.15.040, Environmental protection.
(b) Possible mitigation techniques include, but are not limited to, buffers, setbacks, limits on
clearing and grading, creation of artificial wetlands, stream bank stabilization, modified
construction methods, and BMPs for erosion control and maintenance of water quality.
(c) All proposed mitigation shall be documented in a mitigation plan included as an element
of the critical area detailed study. The mitigation plan shall include a description of the
following:
(i) The proposed mitigation;
(ii) How the proposed mitigation will maintain the critical area function, any ongoing
monitoring and/or inspection that may be required to ensure the adequacy of the proposed
mitigation, and an evaluation of the anticipated effectiveness of the proposed mitigation;
(iii) Any remedial measures that may be required, depending on the outcome of that
ongoing monitoring and/or inspection;
(iv) Any required critical areas expertise necessary to install, monitor, or inspect the
proposed mitigation; and
Page 141 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 90
(v) Any bonding or other security required to insure performance and/or maintenance of
the proposed mitigation.
(14) Buffers.
(a) Buffers have, in some cases, been determined to be necessary to protect critical areas and
their functions. Where specific buffers are identified, those buffers are deemed “required” or
“standard” buffers. See Table 29.15.020(2) for riparian buffers and PMC 29.25.030 for wetland
buffers.
(i) Except as otherwise specified herein, required buffers shall be retained in their pre-
existing condition. If a project does not propose any alteration of buffers or of the
associated critical area, then subject to the following provision, no additional mitigation
will be required to protect the critical area. Additional mitigation beyond the required
buffer shall be required if the Shoreline Administrator finds that, based on unique features
of the critical area or its buffer or of the proposed activity, the required buffers will not
adequately protect the function of the critical area or prevent risk of hazard from the critical
area and that additional mitigation or buffering is required to protect the critical area
function or to prevent risk of hazard from the critical area.
(ii) The buffer shall be marked prior to any site alteration, and boundary markers shall be
visible, durable, and permanently affixed to the ground. The boundary markers shall remain
until all activity is completed and a final site inspection is completed.
(iii) An eight-foot-minimum setback shall be required from the buffer area for any
construction of impervious surface area greater 120 square feet. Clearing, grading, and
filling within this setback shall only be allowed when the applicant can demonstrate that
vegetation within the buffer will not be damaged.
(iv) Where temporary buffer disturbance or alteration has occurred or will occur in
conjunction with regulated activities, revegetation with appropriate native vegetation shall
be required and completed one month before the end of the growing season.
(v) Normal nondestructive pruning and trimming of vegetation for maintenance purposes,
or thinning of limbs of individual trees to provide a view corridor, shall not be subject to
these buffer requirements. Enhancement of a view corridor shall not be construed to mean
excessive removal of trees or vegetation that impairs views. See also PMC 29.15.050,
Shoreline vegetation conservation.
(b) If the applicant proposes to reduce required buffers or to alter the required buffer, then the
applicant shall demonstrate why such buffer modification, together with any alternative
mitigation proposed in the critical area detailed study, is sufficient to protect the critical area
function or to prevent risk of hazard from the critical area.
(c) The critical area detailed study shall make adequate provision for long-term buffer
protection. Periodic inspection of the buffers may be required if deemed to ensure long-term
buffer protection.
(15) Bonding. The Shoreline Administrator shall have the discretion to require a bond, which will
ensure compliance with the mitigation plan if activity related to the protection of the critical area(s)
(e.g., monitoring or maintenance) or construction is scheduled to take place after the issuance of
the City’s permit. The bond shall be in the form of a surety bond, performance bond, assignment
of savings account, or an irrevocable standby letter of credit guaranteed by a financial institution
with terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. The bond shall be in the amount of 125
percent of the estimated cost of the uncompleted actions or construction, or the estimated cost of
restoring the function and values of the critical area that is at risk, whichever is higher. The term
Page 142 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 91
of the bond shall be two years, or until the additional activity or construction has been completed
and passed the necessary inspections, whichever is longer.
(16) Incentives. The following incentives are intended to minimize the burden to individual
property owners from application of the provisions of this chapter:
(a) Open Space. Any property owner on whose property a critical area or its associated buffer
is located and who proposes to put the critical area and buffer in a separate tract may apply for
current use property tax assessment on that separate tract through Franklin County, pursuant
to Chapter 84.34 RCW.
(b) Conservation Easement. Any person whose property contains an identified critical area
or its associated buffer may place a conservation easement over that portion of the property by
naming a beneficiary under RCW 64.04.130 as beneficiary of the conservation easement. This
conservation easement may be in lieu of a separate critical areas tract that qualifies for open-
space tax assessment described in this subsection (16). The purpose of the easement shall be
to preserve, protect, maintain, restore, and limit future use of the property affected. The terms
of the conservation easement may include prohibitions or restrictions on access.
(17) Critical Areas Mapping. The approximate location and extent of critical areas in the City of
Pasco may include the following:
(a) Critical areas shown on the critical areas map adopted as a part of the Comprehensive
Plan.
(b) Other mapping resources provided in PMC 29.25.010(5).
Mapping resources are to be used only as guides to alert the user to the possible distribution,
location, and extent of critical areas. Mapping shall be utilized as a source of generalized
information and shall not be considered as regulatory standards or substitute for site-specific
assessments. The actual type, extent, and boundaries of critical areas shall be determined in the
field by a qualified specialist according to the procedures, definitions, and criteria established
in this chapter. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.510.]
29.25.030 Wetlands.
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to promote public health and welfare by instituting
local measures to preserve naturally occurring wetlands that exist in the City’s shoreline
jurisdiction for their associated value. These areas may serve a variety of vital functions, including,
but not limited to, flood storage and conveyance, water quality protection, recharge and discharge
areas for groundwater, erosion control, sediment control, fish and wildlife habitat, recreation,
education, and scientific research.
(2) Wetland Designation. Under this chapter, wetlands shall be designated in accordance with the
definitions, methods, and standards set forth in the approved 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation
Manual, as amended and its applicable regional supplements, as amended (The Arid West Final
Regional Supplement was last updated in 2008 at time of SMP adoption). All areas within the City
of Pasco meeting the criteria identified in this delineation manual, regardless of whether or not
these areas have been formally identified as wetlands, are hereby designated as wetland critical
areas and are subject to the provisions of this chapter.
(3) Wetland Rating (Classification).
(a) The wetlands rating system is intended to differentiate between wetlands based on their
sensitivity to disturbance, rarity, irreplaceability, and the functions and values they provide. A
general description of wetland categories and the rationale for each category is provided in
PMC 29.05.070, Definitions (see “Wetland Categories”).
Page 143 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 92
(b) Wetlands shall be rated (classified) as either Category I, Category II, Category III, or
Category IV according to the criteria listed in this section. This rating system is based on the
Washington Department of Ecology’s Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Eastern
Washington-Ecology Publication No. 14-06-030 (October 2014), as amended. The most
current edition of this document should be used in classifying wetlands and developing wetland
mitigation plans.
(4) Wetland Indicators. The following indicators of wetland presence shall be used by the
Shoreline Administrator to determine if a wetland detailed study is needed:
(a) Listing in the City’s critical areas mapping resources as a wetland or resources listed in
PMC 29.25.010(5);
(b) Documentation, through references in state or federal handbooks and/or reports by
qualified experts;
(c) A finding by a qualified wetland biologist that an appropriate hydrologic, soil, and/or
vegetation regime indicative of a wetland exists; or
(d) A reasonable belief by the Shoreline Administrator that a wetland may exist, supported
by a site visit and subsequent consultation with a qualified wetland biologist.
(5) Wetland Detailed Study. Requirements. If a wetland detailed study is required, it shall meet
the following requirements in addition to the basic requirements identified in PMC 29.25.020(10):
(a) The wetland detailed study shall be completed by a qualified wetlands biologist.
(b) The extent and boundaries of any wetlands shall be determined in accordance with the
methodology specified under subsection (2) of this section. The boundary shall be surveyed
and mapped at a scale no smaller than one inch equals 200 feet.
(c) A wetland community description and wetland classification shall be completed,
consistent with the requirements of subsection (2) of this section.
(d) A written values and functions assessment shall be completed and address site hydrology
(source of water in the system, water quality, flood and stream flow attenuation, seasonality of
presence of water, if applicable), soils, vegetation, fish and wildlife habitat, recreation, and
aesthetics.
(e) The site plan for the proposed activity shall be mapped at the same scale as the wetland
map, showing the extent of the proposed activity in relationship to the surveyed wetland,
including a detailed narrative describing the project, its relationship to the wetland, and its
potential impact on the wetland.
(f) The proposed mitigation plan shall follow the general mitigation plan requirements
described in PMC 29.25.020(13), and address how the activity has been mitigated to avoid and
minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. The Wetland Mitigation in Washington State – Part 2:
Developing Mitigation Plans, Department of Ecology Publication No. 06-06-011b, March
2006 (or any succeeding documents) should be used as a basis for mitigation.
(6) Wetland Detailed Study Exemptions. In addition to activities exempted in PMC 29.25.020(3)
and PMC 29.35.080, the following activities shall not require a wetland detailed study, provided
they are conducted using accepted BMPs as determined by the Shoreline Administrator:
(a) Conservation or preservation of soil, water, vegetation, fish, or other wildlife.
(7) Basic Wetland Requirement. A regulated wetland or its required buffer can only be altered if
the wetland detailed study shows that:
(a) The proposed alteration does not degrade the quantitative and qualitative functions of the
wetland and results in no net loss of ecological function, or
Page 144 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 93
(b) Any degradation can be adequately mitigated to protect the wetland function. Any
proposed alteration approved pursuant to this section shall include mitigation necessary to
mitigate the impacts of the proposed alteration on the wetland as described in this section and
PMC 29.25.020(13).
(8) Required Buffers.
(a) Buffer Requirements. The following buffers shall be required for wetlands based on the
rating of the wetland as outlined in subsection (3) and land-use intensity described in Table
29.25.030(8)(b).
(i) Any wetland created, restored, or enhanced as compensation for approved wetland
alterations shall also include the standard buffer required for the category of the created,
restored, or enhanced wetland.
Table 29.25.030(8)(a). Wetland Buffer Width Requirements
Wetland Characteristics Buffer Width by Impact of
Proposed Land Use
Other Measures
Recommended for
Protection
Category IV Wetlands (For wetlands scoring less than 16 points for all functions)
Score for all three basic
functions is less than 16 points
Low – 25 feet
Moderate – 40 feet
High – 50 feet
No recommendations at
this time
Category III Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 16 to 18 points or more for all functions)
Moderate level of function for
habitat (score for habitat 5 to 7
points)
*If wetland scores 8 to 9 habitat
points, use Category II buffers
Low – 75 feet
Moderate – 110 feet
High – 150 feet
No recommendations at
this time
Score habitat for 3 to 4 points Low – 40 feet
Moderate – 60 feet
No recommendations at
this time
Page 145 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 94
Wetland Characteristics Buffer Width by Impact of
Proposed Land Use
Other Measures
Recommended for
Protection
High – 80 feet
Category II Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 19 to 21 points or more for all functions or
having the “Special Characteristics” identified in the rating system)
High level of function for habitat
(score for habitat 8 to 9 points)
Low – 100 feet
Moderate – 150 feet
High – 200 feet
Maintain connections to
other habitat areas
Moderate level of function for
habitat (score for habitat 5 to 7
points)
Low – 75 feet
Moderate – 110 feet
High – 150 feet
No recommendations at
this time
High level of function for water
quality improvement and low for
habitat (score for water quality 8
to 9 points; habitat less than 5
points)
Low – 50 feet
Moderate – 75 feet
High – 100 feet
No additional surface
discharges of untreated
runoff
Riparian forest Buffer width to be based on
score for habitat functions
or water quality functions
Riparian forest wetlands
need to be protected at a
watershed or subbasin
scale
Page 146 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 95
Wetland Characteristics Buffer Width by Impact of
Proposed Land Use
Other Measures
Recommended for
Protection
Other protection based on
needs to protect habitat
and water quality functions
Not meeting above characteristic Low – 50 feet
Moderate – 75 feet
High – 100 feet
No recommendations at
this time
Vernal pool Low – 100 feet
Moderate – 150 feet
High – 200 feet
Or develop a regional plan
to protect the most
important vernal pool
complexes; buffers of
vernal pools outside
protection zones can then
be reduced to:
Low – 40 feet
Moderate – 60 feet
High – 80 feet
No intensive grazing or
tilling of wetland
Category I Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 22 points or more for all functions or having
the “Special Characteristics” identified in the rating system)
Page 147 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 96
Wetland Characteristics Buffer Width by Impact of
Proposed Land Use
Other Measures
Recommended for
Protection
Wetlands of high conservation
value
Low – 125 feet
Moderate – 190 feet
High – 250 feet
No additional surface
discharges to wetland or its
tributaries
No septic systems within
300 feet of wetland
Restore degraded parts of
buffer
High level of function for habitat
(score for habitat 8 to 9 points)
Low – 100 feet
Moderate – 150 feet
High – 200 feet
Restore degraded parts of
buffer
Maintain connections to
other habitat areas
Moderate level of function for
habitat (score for habitat 5 to 7
points)
Low – 75 feet
Moderate – 110 feet
High – 150 feet
No recommendations at
this time
High level of function for water
quality improvement (8 to 9
points) and low for habitat (less
than 5 points)
Low – 50 feet
Moderate – 75 feet
High – 100 feet
No additional surface
discharges of untreated
runoff
Not meeting above
characteristics
Low – 50 feet
Moderate – 75 feet
No recommendations at
this time
Page 148 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 97
Wetland Characteristics Buffer Width by Impact of
Proposed Land Use
Other Measures
Recommended for
Protection
High – 100 feet
Note:
See Table 29.25.030(8)(b) in this section, or as amended by Ecology, for types of land uses that can
result in low, moderate, and high impacts to wetlands.
(b) The Land Use Intensity Table describes the types of proposed land use that can result in
high, moderate, and low levels of impacts to adjacent wetlands.
Table 29.25.030(8)(b). Land Use Intensity Table
Level of Impact from
Proposed Change in
Land Use
Types of Land Use Based on Common Zoning
Designations
High
• Commercial
• Urban
• Industrial
• Institutional
• Retail sales Mixed-use developments
• Residential (more than one unit/acre)
• Roads: federal and state highways, including on-ramps
and exits, state routes, and other roads associated with
high-impact land uses
• Railroads
Page 149 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 98
Level of Impact from
Proposed Change in
Land Use
Types of Land Use Based on Common Zoning
Designations
• Agriculture with high-intensity activities (dairies,
nurseries, greenhouses, growing and harvesting crops
requiring annual tilling, raising and maintaining animals,
etc.
• Open/recreational space with high-intensity uses (golf
courses, ball fields, etc.)
• Solar farms (utility scale) Conversion to high-intensity
agriculture (dairies, nurseries, greenhouses, growing and
harvesting crops requiring annual tilling and raising and
maintaining animals, etc.)
• High-intensity recreation (e.g., golf courses and ball fields)
• Hobby farms
Moderate
• Residential (1 unit/acre or less)
• Roads: Forest Service roads and roads associated with
moderate impact land uses
• Open/recreational space with moderate-intensity uses
(parks with paved trails or playgrounds, biking, jogging,
etc.)
• Agriculture with moderate-intensity uses (orchards, hay
fields, light or rotational grazing, etc.)
Page 150 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 99
Level of Impact from
Proposed Change in
Land Use
Types of Land Use Based on Common Zoning
Designations
• Moderate-intensity open space (e.g., parks with biking
and jogging)
• Paved driveways and gravel driveways serving three or
more residences
• Paved trails
• Utility corridor or right-of-way shared used by several one
or more utilities and including access/maintenance road
•Wind Farm
Low
•Natural resource lands (forestry/silviculture–cutting of
trees only, not land clearing and removing stumps)
• Forestry (cutting of trees only)
• Low-intensity open space (e.g., hiking, bird-watching, and
preservation of natural resources)
• Unpaved trails
• Utility corridor without a maintenance road and little or
no vegetation management
(c) Measuring Buffer Dimensions. Wetland buffers shall be measured horizontally in a
landward direction from the delineated wetland edge.
(d) Wetlands Adjacent to Slopes. Where lands adjacent to a wetland display a continuous
slope of 25 percent or greater, the buffer shall include such sloping areas. Where the horizontal
Page 151 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 100
distance of the sloping area is greater than the required standard buffer, the buffer shall be
extended to a point 25 feet beyond the top of the bank of the sloping area.
(9) Buffer Width Modifications.
(a) Administrative Buffer Width Averaging. The required buffer widths established in this
SMP may be modified by the Shoreline Administrator for a development on existing legal lots
of record in place at the time of adoption of this SMP.
Buffer widths may be modified in accordance with the provisions of this section only where
the applicant demonstrates all of the following:
(i) Averaging is necessary to avoid an extraordinary hardship to the applicant caused by
circumstances peculiar to the property;
(ii) The designated buffer area contains variations in sensitivity to ecological impacts due
to existing physical characteristics or the character of the buffer varies in slope, soils, or
vegetation;
(iii) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less than that contained
within the standard buffer prior to averaging;
(iv) The minimum buffer width at its narrowest point shall not be less than 65 percent of
the required buffer width established under this SMP; and
(v) The buffer width averaging does not result in a net loss of ecological function.
(b) Wetland Buffer Reductions.
(i) For wetlands that score moderate or high for habitat function, the width of the buffer
can be reduced if the following criteria are met:
(A) A relatively undisturbed vegetative corridor of at least 100 feet in width is
protected between the wetland and any other priority habitats; and
(B) The protected area is preserved by means of easement, covenant or other measure;
and
(C) Measures identified in subsection (9)(b)(ii)(A) of this section are taken to
minimize the impact of any proposed land use.
(ii) For wetlands that score low for habitat function, the buffer width can be reduced to
that required for moderate land-use impacts by applying the following measures to
minimize the impacts of the proposed land uses:
(A) Wetland buffers may be administratively modified based on reducing the intensity
of impacts from land uses. Buffer widths required for high-intensity land uses may be
reduced to those required for moderate land use intensity under the following
conditions:
• Direct lights away from the wetland and buffer.
• Locate activities that generate noise away from the wetland and buffer.
• Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within 200 feet of a wetland.
• Implement integrated pest-management programs.
• Infiltrate or treat, detain and disperse runoff into buffer.
• Post signs at the outer edge of the critical area or buffer to clearly indicate the location
of the critical area according to the direction of the City.
• Plant buffer with native vegetation appropriate for the region to create screens or
barriers to noise, light, and human intrusion, as well as to discourage domestic animal
intrusion.
• Use low-impact development where appropriate.
Page 152 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 101
• Establish a permanent conservation easement to protect the wetland and the associated
buffer.
(10) Compensatory Mitigation. As a condition of any development permit or approval, which
results in on-site loss or degradation of regulated wetlands and/or wetland buffers, the City may
require the applicant to provide compensatory mitigation to ensure no net loss of ecological
function and to offset impacts resulting from the actions of the applicant. The following standards
shall apply:
(a) The mitigation shall be conducted on property that shall be protected and managed to
avoid further loss or degradation. The applicant shall provide for long-term preservation of the
mitigation area.
(b) Mitigation ratios shall be consistent with the following entitled Washington State
Department of Ecology manual; Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Part 1: Agency
Policies and Guidance (Version 21, Publication #21-06-003, April 202106-06-011a, March
2006) and Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans
(Version 1, Publication No. 06-06-011b, March 2006). See Table 29.25.030(13), Wetland
Mitigation Ratios for Eastern Washington.
(c) Mitigation shall follow an approved mitigation plan and reflect the restoration/creation
ratios specified above.
(d) The applicant shall enter in to a wetland mitigation monitoring agreement with the City
as a condition of approval. The monitoring program will continue for at least eight years from
the date of plant installation. Monitoring will continue for 10 years where woody vegetation
(forested or shrub wetlands) is the intended result.
These communities take at least eight years after planting to reach 80 percent canopy closure.
Reporting for a 10-year monitoring period shall occur in years 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10. Monitoring
in all instances shall be bonded. Reporting results of the monitoring data to the City is the
responsibility of the applicant.
(e) Mitigation shall be completed prior to or concurrently with wetland loss, or, in the case of
an enforcement action, prior to continuation of the activity by the applicant.
(f) On-site mitigation is generally preferred over off-site mitigation.
(g) Off-site mitigation allows replacement of wetlands away from the site on which the
wetland has been impacted by a regulated activity. Off-site mitigation will be conducted in
accordance with the restoration/creation ratios described above and in Table 29.25.030(13),
Wetland Mitigation Ratios (for Eastern Washington). Off-site mitigation shall occur within the
same drainage basin as the wetland loss occurs; provided, that Category IV wetlands may be
replaced outside of the watershed if there is no reasonable alternative. Off-site mitigation may
be permitted where:
(i) On-site mitigation is not feasible due to hydrology, soils, or other factors.
(ii) On-site mitigation is not practical due to probable adverse impacts from surrounding
land uses or would conflict with a federal, state, or local public safety directive.
(iii) Potential functional values at the site of the proposed restoration are greater than the
lost wetland functional values.
(h) When the wetland to be altered is of a limited functional value and is degraded, mitigation
shall be of the wetland community types needed most in the location of mitigation and those
most likely to succeed with the highest functional value possible.
(i) Except in the case of cooperative mitigation projects in selecting mitigation sites,
applicants shall pursue locations in the following order of preference:
Page 153 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 102
(i) Filled, drained, or cleared sites that were formerly wetlands and where appropriate
hydrology exists.
(ii) Upland sites adjacent to wetlands, if the upland is significantly disturbed and does not
contain a mature forested or shrub community of native species, and where the appropriate
natural hydrology exists.
(j) Where out-of-kind replacement is accepted, greater restoration/creation ratios may be
required.
(k) Construction of mitigation projects shall be timed to reduce impacts to existing wildlife
and plants. Construction shall be timed to ensure that grading and soil movement occurs during
the dry season, and planting of vegetation shall be specifically timed to the needs of target
species.
(11) Innovative Mitigation.
(a) One or more applicants, or an organization may undertake a mitigation project together if
it is demonstrated that all of the following circumstances exist:
(i) Creation of one or several larger wetlands may be preferable to many small wetlands;
(ii) The group demonstrates the organizational and fiscal capability to act cooperatively;
(iii) The group demonstrates that long-term management of the mitigation area will be
provided; and
(iv) There is a clear potential for success of the proposed mitigation at the identified
mitigation site.
(b) Wetland mitigation and banking programs shall be consistent with the provisions outlined
in the Department of Ecology’s publication Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Part 1:
Agency Policies and Guidance (Version 1, Publication No. 06-06-011a, March 2006) and
Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans (Version 1,
Publication No. 06-06-01b, March 2006).
(i) Credits from a wetland mitigation bank may be approved for use as compensation for
unavoidable impacts to wetlands when:
(A) The bank is certified under Chapter 173-700 WAC;
(B) The Shoreline Administrator determines the wetland mitigation bank provides
appropriate compensation for the authorized impacts; and
(C) The proposed use of credits is consistent with the terms and conditions of the
bank’s certification.
(ii) Replacement ratios for projects using bank credits shall be consistent with
replacement ratios specified in the bank’s certification.
(iii) Credits from a certified wetland mitigation bank may be used to compensate for
impacts located within the service area specified in the bank’s certification. In some cases,
the service area of the bank may include portions of more than one adjacent drainage basin
for specific wetland functions.
(12) Mitigation Exceptions. Requirements for mitigation do not apply when a wetland alteration
is intended exclusively for the enhancement or restoration of an existing regulated wetland, and
the proposal will not result in a loss of wetland function and value, subject to the following
conditions:
(a) The enhancement or restoration project shall not be associated with a development
activity.
(b) A restoration plan shall be prepared and approved as described in subsection (13) of this
section.
Page 154 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 103
(13) Restoration. Restoration is required when a wetland or its buffer has been altered in violation
of this chapter. The following minimum performance standards shall be met for the restoration of
a wetland; provided, that if it can be demonstrated by the applicant that greater functional and
habitat values can be obtained, these standards may be modified:
(a) The original wetland configuration should be replicated, including depth, width, and
length at the original location.
(b) The original soil types and configuration shall be replicated.
(c) The wetland, including buffer areas, shall be replanted with native vegetation, which
replicates the original species, sizes, and densities.
(d) The original functional values shall be restored, including water quality and wildlife
habitat functions.
(e) Required replacement ratios are shown in the Re-establishment or Creation column of
Table 29.25.030(13), Wetland Mitigation Ratios for Eastern Washington.
(f) A restoration plan shall be prepared and approved prior to commencement of restoration
work. Such a plan shall be prepared by a qualified wetland biologist and describe how the
proposed actions meet the minimum requirements described above. The Shoreline
Administrator shall, at the applicant’s expense, seek expert advice in determining the adequacy
of the Restoration Plan. Inadequate plans shall be returned to the applicant for revision and
resubmittal.
(14) Wetland mitigation ratios are provided in the Table 29.25.030(14).
Table 29.25.030(14). Wetland Mitigation Ratios for Eastern Washington
Category and
Type
o
f Wetland
ImpactsImpact
ed wetland
Re-
establishment or
Creation3
Rehabilitation
Only1
Re-
establishment or
Creation and
Rehabilitation1
Re-
establishment or
Creation and
Enhancement1
Preservation4
Enhancement
Only15
All Category IV
1.5:1
3:1 1:1 R/C and 1:1 RH 1:1 R/C and 2:1
E6:1
6:1
All Category III
2:1
4:1 1:1 R/C and 2:1 RH 1:1 R/C and 4:1
E8:1
8:1
All other
Category II
3:1
6:1 1:1 R/C and 4:1 RH 1:1 R/C and 8:1
E12:1
12:1
Page 155 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 104
Category and
Type
o
f Wetland
ImpactsImpact
ed wetland
Re-
establishment or
Creation3
Rehabilitation
Only1
Re-
establishment or
Creation and
Rehabilitation1
Re-
establishment or
Creation and
Enhancement1
Preservation4
Enhancement
Only15
Category I based
on score for
functions
4:1
8:1
1:1 R/C and 6:1 RH 1:1 R/C and 12:1
E16:1
16:1
Category
I Natural
Heritage site
Not considered
possible2
6:1
Rehabilitation
of a
Natural
Heritage site
R/C not
considered possible2
R/C not
considered possible2
Case-by-case
Notes:
1 Ratios reflect the amount of compensation : amount of impact. These ratios are based on the assumption that the
rehabilitation or enhancement actions implemented represent the average degree of improvement possible for the site.
Proposals to implement more effective rehabilitation or enhancement actions may result in a lower ratio, while less
effective actions may result in a higher ratio. The distinction between rehabilitation and enhancement is not clear cut.
Instead, rehabilitation and enhancement actions span a continuum. Proposals that fall within the gray area between
rehabilitation and enhancement will result in a ratio that lies between the ratios for rehabilitation and the ratios for
enhancement.
2 The category of impacted wetland is based on scores for functions. Compensation ratios in this table generally do
not apply when impacts involve a wetland whose category is based on special characteristics. Compensation ratios
and options for impacts to these types of wetlands are discussed in Chapters 6B.5.1 to 6B.5.8. Natural Heritage sites,
alkali wetland, and bogs are considered irreplaceable wetlands because they perform some functions that cannot be
replaced through compensatory mitigation. Impacts to such wetlands would therefore result in a net loss of some
functions no matter what kind of compensation is proposed.
Reference:
Washington State Department of Ecology, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region 10, March 2006 April 2021. Wetland Mitigation in Washington State – Part 1: Agency
Policies and Guidance (Version 2 1). Washington State Department of Ecology Publication No. 21-06-003 06-06-
011a. Olympia, Washington (2006).
E = Enhancement
R/C = Re-establishment or Creation
RH = Rehabilitation
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.520.]
29.25.040 Fish and wildlife habitat.
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide a framework to evaluate the development,
design, and location of buildings to ensure that critical fish and wildlife habitat within the shoreline
Page 156 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 105
jurisdiction is preserved and protected, in order to ensure no net loss of ecological function and
avoid habitat fragmentation. These regulations seek to protect critical habitat areas so that
populations of endangered, threatened, and sensitive species are given consideration during the
shoreline development review process.
(2) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Designation and Classification Criteria.
(a) Fish and wildlife habitat areas shall include the following:
Table 29.25.040(2)(a). Criteria for Classification of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas
Habitat Area Characteristic/Classification Source
(1) Areas with which state or federally
designated endangered, threatened, and
sensitive species have a primary association
WDFW, USFWS
(NOAA)
(2) Naturally occurring under 20 acres in size
and their submerged aquatic beds that
provide fish or wildlife habitat
Ecology
(3) Waters of the state classified as fish and
wildlife habitats under the Growth
Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW, and
WAC 365-190-080(5)(c)(v)
• Columbia River
• Snake River
WDNR, Ecology,
WDFW, affected
Indian tribes
(4) State Natural Area Preserves and Natural
Resource Conservation Areas
WDNR
(5) Habitat areas of local importance as
determined by resolution of the City Council
WDFW
(b) All areas within the City of Pasco’s shoreline jurisdiction meeting one or more of these
criteria are hereby designated as critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this section.
Page 157 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 106
(c) Mapping information sources for identification of fish and wildlife habitat conservation
areas include, but are not limited to:
(i) WDFW Priority Habitat and Species Maps.
(ii) Wetlands mapped under the National Wetland Inventory by the U.S. Department of
Interior; USFWS.
(iii) WDFW/WDNR, Washington rivers inventory system maps.
(iv) Maps and reference documents in the City of Pasco SMP Inventory, Analysis, and
Characterization Report, as applicable.
(3) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Rating. Fish and wildlife habitat areas shall be rated as primary
or secondary according to the criteria in this section.
Table 29.25.040(3). Classification by Fish and Wildlife Areas
Habitat Area Classification Source
Primary
habitats
Primary habitats are those areas that are valuable to fish and
wildlife and support a wide variety of species due to an
undisturbed nature, diversity of plant species, and structure,
presence of water, or size, location or seasonal importance and
which meet any of the following qualifying criteria:
(1) The documented presence of
species listed by the federal
government or State of Washington as
endangered, threatened, or sensitive.
WDFW, USFWS
(NOAA)
(2) Those rivers identified as
shorelines of the state under the City
of Pasco Shoreline Master Program,
and streams within the shoreline
jurisdiction.
Ecology
(3) Those wetlands identified as
Category I Wetlands, as defined in this
title.
PMC 29.25.030(3),
Wetland Rating
(Classification)
Page 158 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 107
Habitat Area Classification Source
Secondary
habitats
Secondary habitats are those which are valuable to wildlife and
support a wide variety of species due to an undisturbed
nature, diversity of plant species, structure, presence of water,
or size, location or seasonal importance, but do not meet any
of the qualifying criteria listed in items 1 through 3 in the
Primary Habitats above.
(4) Determination of Need for Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Detailed Study.
(a) A detailed study shall be required for any activity that is within 200 feet of a fish and
wildlife habitat area.
(b) Due to the sensitive nature of certain species, the applicant shall notify the City if the
proposed activity will occur within 660 feet (one-eighth of a mile) of a fish and wildlife habitat
area; the City may then contact appropriate agencies and determine if a detailed study should
be prepared, based on the sensitivity of the site.
(c) The Shoreline Administrator shall require a detailed study of a habitat area if the following
indicators are present:
(i) The area is listed in the City’s critical areas map as a fish and wildlife habitat area;
(ii) Documentation exists that shows that any of the classification criteria listed in
subsection (3) of this section are present, based on any of the references listed in this
section;
(iii) A qualified fish and wildlife biologist finds that habitat conditions appropriate to meet
one or more of the classification criteria listed above in subsection (3) of this section exist;
or
(iv) The Shoreline Administrator possesses a reasonable belief that a Fish and Wildlife
Habitat may exist. Such reasonable belief shall be supported by a site visit and subsequent
consultation with a qualified fish and wildlife biologist.
(5) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Detailed Study Requirements. If a fish and wildlife habitat
area detailed study is required, it shall include and/or meet the following requirements in addition
to the basic requirements identified in PMC 29.25.020(10).
(a) The detailed study shall be completed by a qualified fish and wildlife biologist with
expertise in assessing the relevant species and habitats. Evidence of qualifications shall be
provided with the detailed study.
(b) The site plan and map submitted shall be of a scale no smaller than one inch equals 200
feet. The site plan shall indicate all fish and wildlife habitat critical areas, as determined by the
criteria in subsection (3) of this section, and shall include the area within 200 feet of the subject
property. The applicant may prepare the site plan; however, it is subject to review by the
qualified fish and wildlife biologist. The extent and boundaries of the habitat shall be
determined by the qualified fish and wildlife biologist.
(c) A habitat description shall be included, including a habitat rating as described in
subsection (3) of this section, and a statement of functions and values providing information
Page 159 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 108
on the species in question and the associated plant and animal communities. A complete list of
species and special habitat features shall be included.
(d) A regulatory analysis shall be included, including a discussion of any federal, state, tribal,
and/or local requirements or special management recommendations developed specifically for
species and/or habitats located on the site.
(e) The proposed mitigation plan shall address how the proposed development activity has
been mitigated to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the habitat and shall follow the
general mitigation plan requirements described in subsection (3) of this section.
(f) A statement of management and maintenance practices shall be included, including a
discussion of ongoing maintenance practices that will ensure protection of all fish and wildlife
habitat conservation areas on site after the project has been completed.
(g) Habitat and Buffer Recommendation. Riparian habitat areas: For the protection of habitat
along rivers, the buffer widths provided in Table 29.15.020(2), Shoreline Development
Standards Matrix apply.
(h) Habitats and species that have been identified as priority species or priority habitats by
the WDFW Priority Habitats and Species program should not be reduced and shall be
preserved through regulation, acquisition, incentives, and other techniques.
(6) Minimum Performance Standards Requirements. This section describes the minimum
performance standard requirements for habitat areas, including riparian habitats, anadromous
salmonids, and specific requirements for bald eagle habitat areas.
(a) Riparian Habitats.
(i) Buffer Requirements. Native vegetation standard buffers for activities occurring
adjacent to streams within fish and wildlife habitat areas shall be maintained. Buffer widths
shall be based on the extent of prior stream channel modification. Riparian buffers are
determined by whether or not a salmonid habitat is present.
(ii) The buffer distances from the OHWM are provided in Table 29.15.020(2), Shoreline
Development Standards Matrix, apply.
(b) Bald Eagle Habitat. Bald eagle habitat shall be protected pursuant to the Washington State
bald eagle protection rules (WAC 232-12-292). A habitat management plan shall be developed
by the applicant in coordination with the WDFW whenever activities that alter habitat are
proposed near a verified nest territory or communal roost.
(c) Wetland Habitat. All habitat sites containing wetlands shall conform to the wetland
development performance standards set forth in PMC 29.25.030, Wetlands, and shall conform
to the wetland mitigation and restoration provisions set forth in PMC 29.25.030(9) through
(13).
(d) Anadromous Salmonids.
(i) Activities, uses, and alterations proposed to be located in water bodies used by
anadromous salmonids, or in areas that affect such water bodies, shall give special
consideration to the preservation and enhancement of anadromous salmonid habitat,
including, but not limited to, the following:
(A) Activities shall be timed to occur only during the allowable work window, as
designated by the WDFW;
(B) The activity is designed so that it will minimize the degradation of the functions
or values of the fish habitat or other critical areas; and
(C) Any impact on the functions and values of the habitat conservation area are
mitigated in accordance with an approved detailed study.
Page 160 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 109
(ii) Structures that prevent the migration of anadromous salmonids shall not be allowed
in the portion of the water bodies currently used by salmonids. Fish bypass facilities shall
be provided that allow the upstream migration of adult fish and prevent juveniles migrating
downstream from being trapped or harmed.
(iii) Fills waterward of the OHWM, when authorized, shall minimize the adverse impacts
on anadromous salmonids and their habitat, shall mitigate any unavoidable impacts, and
shall only be allowed for water-dependent uses or for uses that enable public access or
recreation for significant numbers of the public.
(7) Buffer Width Modifications.
(a) Administrative Buffer Width Averaging. The required buffer widths established in this
SMP may be modified by the Shoreline Administrator for a development on existing legal lots
of record in place at the time of adoption of this SMP, in accordance with the provisions of this
section only where the applicant demonstrates all of the following:
(i) Averaging is necessary to avoid an extraordinary hardship to the applicant caused by
circumstances peculiar to the property;
(ii) The designated buffer area contains variations in sensitivity to ecological impacts due
to existing physical characteristics or the character of the buffer varies in slope, soils, or
vegetation;
(iii) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less than that contained
within the standard buffer prior to averaging;
(iv) The minimum buffer width at its narrowest point shall not be less than 6575 percent
of the required buffer width established under this SMP; and
(v) The buffer width averaging does not result in a net loss of ecological function.
(b) Exception for Lots Adjacent to Pre-Existing Development. The required riparian buffer
width listed above shall not apply in cases where the adjacent pre-existing development (vested
prior to the effective date of this section) does not meet these established standards. In such
cases, the buffer may be reduced by one-third the difference between the required buffer and
the larger of the two adjacent buffers.
Adjacency in this situation shall be defined as being within 50 feet of the side property lines.
If there is only clearing on one side of the proposed activity within 50 feet of the side property
line, then the buffer can be reduced as described above.
(c) Shoreline Buffer Reductions. Shoreline buffers may be administratively modified as
outlined below:
(i) Where a legally established road or railway, or other type of continuous development,
crosses or extends along a shoreline or critical area buffer and is wider than 20 feet, the
Shoreline Administrator may approve a modification of the minimum required buffer width
to the waterward edge of the improved continuous development provided the upland side
of the continuous development area:
(A) Does not provide additional protection of the shoreline, water body or stream; and
(B) Provides little (less than 20 percent) to no biological, geological, or hydrological
buffer functions relating to the riparian and upland portions of the buffer.
(ii) Standard Buffer Reduction. Reductions of up to 75 percent of the standard required
buffer may be approved if the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Shoreline
Administrator that a mitigation plan developed by a qualified professional pursuant to PMC
29.25.020(13) indicates that enhancing the buffer (by removing invasive plants or
impervious surfaces, planting native vegetation, installing habitat features, or other means)
Page 161 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 110
will result in a reduced buffer that functions at a higher level than the existing standard
buffer.
(8) Allowed Uses in Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas and Stream Buffers.
(a) Roads, Bridges, and Utilities. Road, bridge, and utility maintenance, repair, and
construction may be permitted across a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area and/or
buffers under the following conditions:
(i) It is demonstrated to the Shoreline Administrator that there are no alternative routes
that can be reasonably used to achieve the proposed development;
(ii) The activity will have minimum adverse impact to the fish and wildlife habitat
conservation area;
(iii) The activity will not significantly degrade surface or groundwater; and
(iv) The intrusion into the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area and its buffers is
fully mitigated to achieve no net loss of ecological functions.
(b) Limited park or recreational access to a fish and wildlife habitat area and/or stream
buffers; provided, that all of the following are satisfied:
(i) The access is part of a public park or a recreational resort development that is
dependent on the access for its location and recreational function;
(ii) The access is limited to the minimum necessary to accomplish the recreational
function; and
(iii) The intrusion is fully mitigated to achieve no net loss of ecological functions.
(c) Low-impact uses and activities that are consistent with the purpose and function of the
stream setback and do not detract from its integrity. Examples of low-impact uses and activities
include removal of noxious vegetation and storm water management facilities, such as grass-
lined swales.
(9) Additional Protection Measures.
(a) Temporary and permanent erosion and sedimentation controls shall be provided to prevent
the introduction of sediments or pollutants to water bodies or watercourses within the habitat
area.
(b) Clearing and grading shall be limited to that necessary for establishment of the use or
development and shall be conducted to avoid significant adverse impacts and minimize the
alteration of the volume, rate, or temperature of freshwater flows to or within the habitat area
and any buffer required by this section.
(c) The proposed development shall not discharge hazardous substances to the habitat area
that would have significant adverse impacts on that area.
(d) Stream flows shall be protected from changes to the normal flow, temperature, turbidity,
and discharge to the maximum extent practicable.
(e) Septic drainfields and any required replacement drainfield area shall be at least 100 feet
from the edge of any habitat area.
(f) Exceptions to the above protection standards may be allowed by the Shoreline
Administrator based on a special report prepared by a qualified biological professional that
demonstrates that such exception would not adversely impact the habitat system, functions,
and values of the habitat area.
(g) Activities may only be permitted in a stream or stream buffer if the applicant can show
that the proposed activity will not degrade the functions and values of the stream, stream buffer,
or other critical area.
Page 162 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 111
(h) Stream Crossings. Stream crossings shall be minimized, but when necessary, they shall
conform to the applicable provisions of this SMP and other laws (see WDFW or Ecology).
(i) Storm water conveyance facilities. Storm water conveyance facilities may be permitted;
provided, that they are only located in the buffer when no practicable alternative exists outside
the buffer. Storm water facilities shall be planted with native plantings where feasible to
provide habitat, and/or less intrusive facilities should be used.
(j) Floodway-Dependent Structures. Floodway-dependent structures or installations may be
permitted within streams or their buffers if allowed or approved by other ordinances or other
agencies with jurisdiction. See PMC 29.25.060, Flood hazard areas, for more information on
allowed uses and activities within flood hazard areas.
(k) Trails. The criteria for alignment, construction, and maintenance of trails within wetlands
and their buffers shall apply to trails within stream buffers. Outer buffer trails may not exceed
20 feet in width and may be constructed with impermeable surface materials if on-site
infiltration is utilized.
(l) Utilities. The criteria for alignment, construction, and maintenance within the wetland
buffers and PMC 29.20.160, Utilities, shall apply to utility corridors within stream buffers. In
addition, corridors shall not be aligned parallel with any stream channel unless the corridor is
outside the buffer, and crossings shall be minimized. Installation shall be accomplished by
boring beneath the scour depth and hyporheic zone of the water body where feasible. Crossings
shall be contained within the existing footprint of an existing or new road or utility crossing
where possible. Otherwise, crossings shall be at an angle greater than 60 degrees to the
centerline of the channel. The criteria for stream crossings shall also apply.
(m) Native vegetation landscaping schemes shall be provided that do not require application
of herbicides, pesticides, or fertilizer to maintain robust growth.
(n) No net-effective impervious surfaces may be created in the outer buffer area beyond what
is otherwise permitted.
(o) No structures or related improvements, including buildings or decks, shall be permitted
within the stream buffer, except as otherwise allowed in PMC 29.25.020, General Provisions,
or in this SMP. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.530.]
29.25.050 Aquifer recharge areas.
(1) Purpose. The purpose and intent of this section is to safeguard groundwater resources within
the shoreline jurisdiction from hazardous substance and hazardous waste pollution by controlling
or abating future pollution from new land uses or activities.
(2) Aquifer Recharge Area Designation Criteria.
(a) Aquifer recharge areas shall be classified as follows:
Table 29.25.050(2)(a). Designation of Aquifer Recharge Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area
Characteristic/Designation Source
(1) Wellhead protection areas pursuant to
Chapter 246-290 WAC
WA Department of
Health, US
Page 163 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 112
Aquifer Recharge Area
Characteristic/Designation Source
Environmental
Protection Agency
(2) Areas designated for special protection
pursuant to a groundwater management
program, Chapters 90.44, 90.48, and 90.54
RCW and Chapters 173-100 and 173-200 WAC
Ecology
(3) Areas overlying unprotected aquifers. Such
aquifers shall be identified through any
existing competent hydrogeologic study
USGS, WDNR
(4) Areas within identified unprotected
aquifers but possessing the following
characteristics:
• Slopes less than 15 percent
• Coarse alluvium or sand and gravel in the soil
profile and no known impermeable layers
WDFW
(b) Any project area located within 200 feet of an area meeting the aquifer designation or soil
classification criteria, or mapped as such, shall be treated as if it is located within the mapped
area.
(c) All areas within the City of Pasco meeting these criteria, regardless of the presence or lack
of any formal identification as such, are hereby designated as critical areas and are subject to
the provisions of this title.
(3) Aquifer Recharge Area Classification.
(a) Aquifer recharge areas are classified as high, moderate, or low significance aquifer
recharge areas according to the following criteria:
Table 29.25.050(3)(a). Classification of Aquifer Vulnerability
Page 164 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 113
Vulnerability
Classification Documentation and Data Sources
High Vulnerability
High significance aquifer recharge areas are
areas with slopes of less than 15 percent
underlain by coarse alluvium or sand and
gravel
Moderate
Vulnerability
Moderate significance aquifer recharge areas
are:
(1) Areas with slopes of less than 15 percent
underlain by fine alluvium, silt, clay, glacial till,
or deposits from the Electron Mudflow
(2) Areas with slopes of 15 percent to 30
percent underlain by sand and gravel
Low Vulnerability
Moderate significance aquifer recharge areas
are:
(1) Areas with slopes of 15 percent to 30
percent underlain by silt, clay, or glacial till
(2) Areas with slopes greater than 30 percent
(4) Determination of Need for Aquifer Recharge Detailed Study.
(a) The following information resources shall be utilized along with other documentation
where noted:
(i) Studies from the USGS;
(ii) City of Pasco wastewater facility plan;
(iii) Soil Survey for Franklin Conservation District.
(b) Requirements for High Significance Aquifer Recharge Area. An aquifer recharge area
detailed study shall be required for any activity occurring on or adjacent to a site that is, or
Page 165 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 114
contains, a high significance aquifer recharge area if the activity involves one or more of the
following uses:
(i) Hazardous substance processing or handling;
(ii) Hazardous waste treatment and storage facility;
(iii) Disposal of on-site sewage for subdivisions, short plats, and commercial and
industrial sites; or
(iv) Landfills.
(5) Aquifer Recharge Area Detailed Study. When required as described in subsection (4) of this
section, an aquifer recharge area detailed study shall meet the following requirements:
(a) The detailed study shall be prepared by qualified consultant professional with experience
in preparing hydrogeologic assessments. Evidence of these qualifications shall be provided
with the detailed study.
(b) The detailed study shall contain a map, of a scale no smaller than one inch equals 200
feet, of the site and the extent of the high significance aquifer recharge area as determined by
the criteria in subsection (2) of this section.
(c) The detailed study shall contain a hydrogeologic assessment, including, at a minimum:
(i) Information sources;
(ii) Geologic setting;
(iii) Background water quality;
(iv) Location of, and depth to, water tables;
(v) Recharge potential of the facility site;
(vi) Groundwater flow direction and gradient;
(vii) Currently available data on wells within 1,000 feet of the site;
(viii) Currently available data on springs within 1,000 feet of the site;
(ix) Surface water location and recharge potential;
(x) Water source supply to the activity (e.g., high capacity well);
(xi) Any sampling schedules necessary;
(xii) Discussion of the effects of the proposed project on the groundwater resource; and
(xiii) Other information as may be required by the City.
(d) The detailed study shall include a mitigation plan detailing how the activity will offset
any impact on the resource and control risk of contamination to the aquifer.
(6) Aquifer Recharge Area Detailed Study Special Exemptions. In addition to the exemptions
listed in PMC 29.25.020(3) and 29.35.080, Exemptions for shoreline substantial development
permits, sewer lines and appurtenances shall be exempt from the requirement to prepare an aquifer
recharge area detailed study.
(7) Performance Standards Basic Requirements.
(a) Any activity listed in PMC 29.25.050(4)(b) may only be permitted in a high significance
aquifer recharge area if the detailed study documents that the activity does not pose a threat to
the aquifer system and the proposed activity will not cause contaminants to enter the aquifer.
(b) All activities located in an aquifer recharge area shall minimize the creation of impervious
surfaces to the extent practicable without creating a greater risk to the aquifer recharge area.
(8) Storage Tanks. All Storage tanks located in an aquifer recharge area must conform to the
following requirements. Ecology also regulates and authorizes permits for underground storage
tanks (Chapter 173-360 WAC).
Page 166 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 115
(a) Underground Tanks. All new underground storage facilities used or to be used for the
underground storage of hazardous substances or hazardous wastes shall be designed and
constructed so as to:
(i) Prevent releases due to corrosion or structural failure for the operational life of the
tank;
(ii) Be protected against corrosion, constructed of noncorrosive material, steel clad with
a noncorrosive material, or designed to include a secondary containment system to prevent
the release or threatened release of any stored substances; and,
(iii) Use material in the construction or lining of the tank that is compatible with the
substance to be stored.
(b) Aboveground Tanks.
(i) No new aboveground storage facility or part thereof shall be fabricated, constructed,
installed, used, or maintained in any manner which may allow the release of a hazardous
substance to the soil, groundwater, or surface waters within an aquifer recharge area.
(ii) No new aboveground tank or part thereof shall be fabricated, constructed, installed,
used, or maintained without having constructed around or under it an impervious
containment area enclosing or underlying the tank or part thereof.
(iii) New aboveground tanks will require a secondary containment system, either built
into the tank structure or a dike system built outside the tank, for all tanks located within
an aquifer recharge area. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.540.]
29.25.060 Flood hazard areas.
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to promote the public health, safety, and welfare of
the community by recognizing potential hazards that may be caused by development in areas where
severe flooding is anticipated to occur. The intent of this section is to assist with minimizing public
and private losses due to flood hazards by avoiding development in hazard areas within the
shoreline jurisdiction and/or implementing protective measures contained in this SMP.
(2) Classification. The following categories of frequently flooded areas are established for the
purposes of classification:
(a) Floodway. Floodways are defined as the channel of a stream and adjacent land areas,
which are required to carry and discharge flood waters or flood flows of any river or stream
associated with a regulatory flood.
(b) Special Flood Hazard Areas. The area adjoining the floodway, which is subject to a one
percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year as determined by the Federal Insurance
Administration.
(c) Floodplain. The floodway and special flood hazard areas.
These flood areas have been delineated based on studies completed by FEMA for the National
Flood Insurance Program.
(3) Designation.
(a) All areas within the City meeting the frequently flooded designation criteria of subsection
(2) of this section are hereby designated critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this
section.
(b) The approximate location and extent of frequently flooded areas are shown on the Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) prepared for the City of Pasco and Franklin County by FEMA,
as part of the National Flood Insurance Program.
Page 167 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 116
(4) Management. PMC Title 16, Buildings and Construction, and Chapter 24.20 PMC, Flood
Hazard Protection regulate proposed activities in all areas of special flood hazards. If allowed, any
structures permitted in the designated flood areas are subject to the floodproofing regulations
provided in PMC Title 16 and Chapter 24.20 PMC.
(5) Floodways. Special flood hazard areas established in this section are areas that are extremely
hazardous due to the velocity of flood waters, which carry debris, potential projectiles, and erosion
potential. The following provisions apply to special flood hazard areas:
(a) Prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and
other development unless certification by a registered professional engineer or architect is
provided demonstrating that encroachments shall not result in an increase in flood levels during
the occurrence of the base flood discharge.
(b) If subsection (5)(a) of this section is satisfied, all new construction and substantial
improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of Chapter
24.20 PMC. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.550.]
29.25.070 Geologic hazard areas.
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to reduce the threats to public health and safety posed
by geologic hazards within the shoreline jurisdiction. The intent is to reduce incompatible
development in areas of significant geologic hazard. Development incompatible with geologic
hazards may not only place itself at risk, but also may increase the hazard to surrounding
development. Some geologic hazards can be reduced or mitigated by engineering, design, or
modified construction or altering mining practices so risks to health and safety are minimized.
When technology cannot reduce the risks to acceptable levels, development in the hazard area is
best to be avoided.
(2) Geologic Hazard Area Designation. Geologic hazard areas within the City are those areas
that are susceptible to significant erosion, landslide, flood hazards, seismic hazards, and surface
mine collapse hazards. All areas within the City of Pasco meeting the criteria described in
subsection (3) of this section for known or suspected risk or unknown risk, regardless of the
presence or lack of any formal identification as such, are designated as critical areas and are subject
to the provisions of this section.
(a) Volcanic Hazards. The GMA requires that volcanic hazards be addressed in local critical
area regulations. However, since no volcanic hazards exist in the City area, no volcanic hazards
regulations are needed.
(b) Flood Hazard Areas. Generally, areas subject to flood hazard conditions are regulated by
PMC 29.25.060 and the City of Pasco floodplain regulations (PMC Title 24), which regulate
those areas identified and classified by the FEMA on their Flood Hazard Boundary/Flood
Insurance Rate Maps.
(3) Geologic Hazard Area Classification and Designation Criteria.
(a) Geologic hazard area classification criteria are listed in the table below, along with the
source agencies that provide the guidelines for classification and designation:
Table 29.25.070(3)(a). Criteria for Classification of Geologic Hazard Areas
Page 168 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 117
Hazard Area Classification and Designation Source
Erosion hazard
areas
Areas with soil type possessing erosion hazard
of “moderate to severe,” “severe,” or “very
severe.” (Classification based on both soil type
and slope)
NRCS
Landslide
hazard areas
Areas with slopes of 30 percent or greater and
with a vertical relief of 10 or more feet;
NRCS
Areas with slopes steeper than 15 percent on
hillsides intersecting geologic contacts with a
relatively permeable sediment overlying a
relatively impermeable sediment or bedrock
where springs or groundwater seepage is
present;
NRCS
Areas with slopes parallel or subparallel to
planes of weakness in subsurface materials
(e.g., bedding planes, joint systems, and fault
planes);
NRCS
Areas with slopes having gradients steeper
than 80 percent subject to rockfall during
seismic shaking;
NRCS
Alluvial fans or canyon bottoms presently or
potentially subject to inundation by debris
flows or catastrophic flooding;
NRCS
Page 169 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 118
Hazard Area Classification and Designation Source
Areas that have shown movement during the
Holocene epoch or which are underlain or
covered by wastage debris of this epoch;
NRCS
Evidence of or risk from snow avalanches; NRCS
A “severe” limitation for building site
development due to slope conditions;
NRCS
Areas of historic failure, such as areas
designated as quaternary slumps, earthflows,
mudflows, lahars, or landslides on maps or
technical reports (e.g., topographic or geologic
maps, or other authorized documents).
USGS, WDNR, or
other government
agencies
Flood hazard
areas
Areas potentially unstable as a result of rapid
stream incision, stream bank erosion, and
Undercutting by wave action shall be
addressed as a flood hazard
PMC Title 24
Note:
NRCS = U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
(4) Geologic Hazard Area Rating Criteria. All areas within the City shall be classified by the
following risk categories for each geologic hazard type:
Table 29.25.070(4). Rating of Geologic Hazard Risk
Risk Classification Documentation and Data Sources
Known or suspected
risk
Documentation or projection of the hazard by a
qualified expert exists
Page 170 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 119
Risk Classification Documentation and Data Sources
No risk Documentation or projection of the lack of a hazard by
a qualified expert exists
Risk unknown Data are not available to determine the presence or
absence of a geologic hazard
(5) Determination of Need for Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study. A geologic hazard area
detailed study shall be required if the following indicators are present:
(a) If the project area is listed in the City of Pasco Critical Areas Map as possessing either a
known or suspected risk for erosion, landslide, flood, seismic, or mine hazard.
(b) If the project area is listed in the City of Pasco Critical Areas Map as possessing an
unknown risk for erosion, landslide, flood, seismic, or mine hazard if any of the following are
identified by the applicant or City:
(i) A qualified geologist finds that any of the following exist: evidence of past significant
events of the hazard in question on or adjacent to the site; the presence of necessary and
sufficient factors for events of the hazard in question on or adjacent to the site; or
reasonable uncertainty concerning the hazard or the potential for significant risk to or from
the proposed activity; or
(ii) The Shoreline Administrator possesses a reasonable belief that a geologic hazard may
exist. Such reasonable belief shall be supported by a site visit and subsequent consultation
with a qualified geologist.
(6) Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study Requirements. The minimum requirements for a
geologic hazard area detailed study include the following in addition to the basic requirements
identified in PMC 29.25.020(10):
(a) Basic Requirements. A geologic hazard area detailed study shall meet the following:
(i) The detailed study shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer or geologist.
Evidence of qualifications shall be provided with the detailed study.
(ii) A map, of a scale no smaller than one inch equals 200 feet, of the site and the extent
of the geologic hazard area as determined by the criteria in subsection (3) of this section.
(iii) An assessment of the geologic characteristics and engineering properties of the soils,
sediments, and/or rock of the subject property and potentially affected adjacent properties,
and a review of the site history regarding landslides, erosion, and prior grading. The study
shall include a soils analysis consistent with the accepted regional taxonomic classification
system, and a description of the vulnerability of the site to seismic events. Documentation
of data and methods shall be included.
(iv) A geotechnical analysis, including a detailed description of the proposed project, its
relationship to the geologic hazard(s), and its potential impact upon the hazard area, the
subject property and affected adjacent properties shall be included.
(v) A mitigation plan, if appropriate, prepared by a professional engineer or geologist
under the supervision of a professional engineer qualified to prepare a detailed study. The
Page 171 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 120
mitigation plan shall include a discussion on how the project has been designed to avoid
and minimize the impacts discussed in the geotechnical analysis (see mitigation standards
provided in PMC 29.25.020(13)). The plan shall make a recommendation for the minimum
building setbacks from any geologic hazard based on the geotechnical analysis. The plan
shall also address the potential benefit of mitigation on the hazard area, the subject
property, and affected adjacent properties.
(vi) Where more than one geologic hazard exists within, adjacent to, or impacts, or is
impacted by, the activity site, then only one detailed study is required to be completed to
conduct a geologic hazard critical area review of the activity. The critical area review report
shall meet all of the requirements of each critical area type, but may present a unified
mitigation plan.
(vii) Where a valid geotechnical report has been prepared within the last five years for a
specific site, and where the proposed land use activity and surrounding site conditions are
unchanged, said report may be incorporated into the detailed study. The applicant shall
submit a geotechnical assessment detailing any changed environmental conditions
associated with the site.
(b) Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. In addition to the requirements of subsection (6)(a)
of this section, an erosion hazard or landslide hazard area detailed study must also meet the
following requirements:
(i) The map shall depict the height of slope, slope gradient, and cross section of the site.
The site plan shall also include the location of springs, seeps, or other surface expressions
of groundwater. The site plan shall also depict any evidence of surface or storm water
runoff.
(ii) A description of load intensity, including surface and groundwater conditions, public
and private sewage disposal systems, fills and excavations, and all structural development.
(iii) An estimate of slope stability and the effect construction and placement of structures
will have on the slope during the estimated life of the structure.
(iv) An estimate of the bluff retreat rate that recognizes and reflects potential catastrophic
events, such as seismic activity or a 100-year storm event.
(v) An assessment describing the extent and type of vegetative cover.
(vi) The geotechnical analysis shall specifically include:
(A) Slope stability studies and opinion(s) of slope stability;
(B) Proposed angles of cut and fill slopes and site grading requirements;
(C) Structural foundation requirements and estimated foundation settlements;
(D) Soil compaction criteria;
(E) Proposed surface and subsurface drainage;
(F) Lateral earth pressures;
(G) Vulnerability of the site to erosion;
(H) Suitability of on-site soil for use as fill; and
(I) Building limitations.
(vii) Mitigation proposals shall include the location and methods of drainage, surface
water management, locations, and methods of erosion control, a vegetation management
and/or restoration plan, and/or other means for maintaining long-term stability of slopes.
(c) Flood Hazard Areas. Flood Hazard Areas are addressed through PMC 29.25.060, Flood
hazard areas, and the City of Pasco floodplain regulations (PMC Title 24). If evidence exists
that the proposed development area is subject to flood hazards that are not indicated on the
Page 172 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 121
City’s Flood Hazard Boundary maps, and site characteristics do not warrant an erosion or
landslide hazard detailed study, the City may require additional analysis and preparation of a
mitigation plan to determine if the site is suitable for development.
(d) Seismic Hazard Areas. In addition to the basic requirements, subsection (6)(a) of this
section, a detailed study for a seismic hazard critical area shall also meet the following
requirements:
(i) The site map shall show all known and mapped faults in the project vicinity.
(ii) The geotechnical analysis shall include a complete discussion of the potential impacts
of seismic activity reasonably probable on the site (e.g., forces generated and fault
displacement).
(e) Mine Hazard Areas. In addition to the basic requirements subsection (6)(a) of this section,
a detailed study for a mine hazard critical area shall also meet the following requirements:
(i) The site plan shall delineate the existence of mine workings adjacent to or abutting the
site, or nearby mine workings, which may impact the site; and
(ii) The geotechnical analysis shall include a discussion of the potential for subsidence on
the site.
(f) Volcanic Hazard Areas. The City is located in an area of minimal risk from volcanic
hazard areas.
(7) Performance Standards Minimum Requirements. This section describes the minimum
performance standard requirements for geologic hazard areas.
(a) Basic Requirements.
(i) Alteration of geologic hazard critical areas is permitted only if the development
proposal can be designed so the hazard to the project and any increase of hazard to adjacent
property is eliminated or mitigated, and the development proposal on the site is certified as
safe by a geotechnical engineer licensed in the State of Washington.
(ii) All proposals involving excavations and placement of fills shall be subject to structural
review under Chapter 33, Site Work, Demolition and Construction, of the most current
International Building Code.
(iii) Essential public facilities as defined by RCW 36.70A.200 shall not be sited within
designated geologic hazard areas.
(b) Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing landslide or erosion
hazards shall also meet the following requirements:
(i) Alterations of the buffer and/or geologic hazard area may only occur for activities
meeting the following criteria:
(A) No reasonable alternative exists; and
(B) A geotechnical report is submitted and certifies that:
• The development will not significantly increase surface-water discharge or
sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions;
• The development will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties; and
• That such alterations will not adversely impact other critical areas.
(ii) A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan, prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the standard specification of the City of Pasco.
(iii) A drainage plan for the collection, transport, treatment, discharge and/or recycle of
water in accordance with the standard specifications of the City of Pasco.
(iv) Surface drainage shall not be directed across the face of a landslide hazard area
(including riverine bluffs or ravines). If drainage must be discharged from the hazard area
Page 173 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 122
into adjacent waters, it shall be collected above the hazard and directed to the water by a
tightline drain and provided with an energy dissipating device at the point of discharge.
(v) All infiltration systems, such as storm water detention and retention facilities, and
curtain drains utilizing buried pipe or French drain, are prohibited in landslide hazard areas
and their buffers unless a geotechnical report indicates such facilities or systems or the
failure of the same will not affect slope stability and the systems are designed by a licensed
civil engineer.
(vi) A minimum standard buffer width of 30 feet shall be established from the top, toe,
and all edges of landslide and erosion hazard areas. Existing native vegetation shall be
maintained. The buffer may be reduced to a minimum of 10 feet when an applicant
demonstrates the reduction will adequately protect the proposed development, adjacent
developments and uses, and the subject critical area. The buffer may be increased by the
Shoreline Administrator for development adjacent to a river bluff or ravine, or in other
areas that circumstances may warrant, where it is determined a larger buffer is necessary
to prevent risk of damage to proposed and existing development, as in the case where the
area potentially impacted by a landslide exceeds 30 feet.
(vii) On-site sewage disposal systems, including drainfields, shall be prohibited within
landslide and erosion hazard areas and related buffers.
(viii) Development designs shall meet the following basic requirements, unless it can be
demonstrated that an alternative design provides greater long-term slope stability while
meeting all other criteria of this section. The requirement for long-term slope stability shall
exclude designs that require periodic maintenance or other actions to maintain their level
of function. The basic development design standards are:
(A) Structures and improvement shall be clustered to retain as much open space as
possible and to preserve the natural topographic features of the site.
(B) Structures and improvements shall conform to the natural contour of the slope,
and foundations shall be tiered where possible to conform to existing topography.
(C) Structures and improvements shall be located to preserve the most critical portion
of the site and its natural landforms and vegetation.
(D) The use of retaining walls that allow the maintenance of existing natural slope
area is preferred over graded artificial slopes.
(E) All development shall be designed to minimize impervious lot coverage.
(c) Flood Hazard Areas. Activities in flood hazard areas shall comply with PMC 29.25.060,
Flood hazard areas, and the City of Pasco floodplain regulations (PMC Title 24).
(d) Seismic Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing seismic hazards shall also meet the
following requirements:
(i) Mitigation is implemented, which reduces the seismic risk to a level equivalent to that
which the activity would experience if it were not located in a seismic hazard area.
(ii) Structural development proposals shall meet all applicable provisions of Chapter 16
of the most current edition of the International Building Code (Structural Forces/Structural
Design Requirements).
(iii) No residential structures or essential public facility shall be located on a Holocene
fault line as indicated by USGS investigative maps and studies.
(e) Mine Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing mine hazards shall also meet the
following requirements:
Page 174 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 123
(i) Mitigation is implemented which reduces the risk from mine hazards to a level
equivalent to that which the activity would experience if it were not located in a mine
hazard area.
(f) Volcanic Hazard Areas. No additional requirements.
(8) Long-Term Mitigation and Restoration Standards.
(a) The mitigation plan shall specifically address how the activity maintains or reduces the
pre-existing level of risk to the site and adjacent properties on a long-term basis (equal to or
exceeding the projected lifespan of the activity or occupation). Mitigation techniques providing
long-term hazard reduction are those that do not require periodic maintenance or other actions
to maintain their function.
(b) Mitigation may be required to avoid any increase in risk above the pre-existing conditions
following abandonment of the activity.
(c) Any required restoration shall meet the long-term hazard reduction standards. In the case
of restoration, long-term shall be defined as the equivalent of natural function. [Ord. 4314 § 2,
2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.560.]
Chapter 29.30
EXISTING USES, STRUCTURES, AND LOTS
Sections:
29.30.010 Applicability.
29.30.020 Nonconforming uses.
29.30.030 Nonconforming structures.
20.30.040 Nonconforming lots
29.30.010 Applicability.
(1) All nonconformances in shoreline jurisdiction shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter.
For nonconformance of use, structures, and lots within shoreline critical areas, Chapter 29.25
PMC, Critical Areas, applies. When there is a conflict between this section and the critical areas
section as applicable to critical areas, the more restrictive standards shall apply.
(2) The provisions of this SMP do not supersede or relieve a property owner from compliance
with:
(a) The requirements of the International Building and Fire Codes; or
(b) The provisions of the SMP beyond the specific nonconformance addressed by this chapter.
(3) A change in the required permit review process (e.g., shoreline substantial development
permit versus a shoreline special use permit) shall not create a nonconformance.
(4) Any nonconformance that is brought into conformance for any period of time shall forfeit
status as nonconformance, except as specified in PMC 29.30.020, Nonconforming Uses.
(5) A nonconforming lot, use, or structure may be deemed legally nonconforming by providing
documentation that the use in question occurred prior to the effective date of this SMP, from two
of the following:
(a) Local agency permit;
(b) Orthophotograph, aerial photograph, or planimetric mapping recognized as legitimate by
the agency; or
(c) Tax record.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.600.]
Page 175 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 124
29.30.020 Nonconforming uses.
(1) If, at the effective date of the SMP and any amendment thereto, a lawful use of land exists
that is made no longer permissible under the terms of this SMP, or amendments thereto, such use
may be continued as a nonconforming use so long as it remains otherwise lawful subject to the
following conditions:
(a) No nonconforming use shall be intensified, enlarged, increased, or extended to occupy a
greater area of land than was occupied on the effective date of the SMP or the amendment that
made the use no longer permissible; provided that a nonconforming use may be enlarged,
increased, or extended in conformance with applicable bulk and dimensional standards of this
SMP upon approval of a shoreline special use permit.
(b) No nonconforming use shall be moved in whole or in part to any other portion of the lot
that contains the nonconforming use.
(c) If any nonconforming use of land ceases for any reason for a period of one year or more,
any subsequent use of such land shall conform to the regulations specified by this SMP for the
use environment in which such land is located.
(d) A structure, which is being or has been used for a nonconforming use, may be used for a
different nonconforming use only upon a finding that:
(i) No reasonable alternative conforming use is practical;
(ii) The proposed use is equally or more appropriate to the shoreline environment than the
existing nonconforming use, and is at least as consistent with the policies and provisions
of the Act and the SMP; and
(iii) Such a change of use shall be subject to a shoreline special use permit approval.
Conditions may be attached to the permit as are deemed necessary to ensure compliance
with the above findings and the requirements of the SMP and the SMA, and to ensure that
the use will not become a nuisance or a hazard.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.610.]
29.30.030 Nonconforming structures.
(1) If, at the effective date of the SMP or any amendment thereto, a lawful structure or other
improvement exists, which is made no longer permissible under the terms of this SMP or
amendment thereto, such structure or other improvement may be continued as a nonconforming
structure or other improvement so long as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the following
conditions:
(a) No nonconforming structure or other improvement shall be altered or changed in a way
which increases its nonconformity except as allowed in subsection (1)(b) of this section.
(b) Expansions of structures that are nonconforming with respect to a required shoreline
buffer:
(i) May not encroach any farther waterward into the required shoreline buffer.
(ii) Expansions parallel to or landward of shoreline may be allowed; provided, that said
enlargement does not increase the extent of nonconformity by farther encroaching upon or
extending into areas where construction or use would not be allowed for new development
or uses.
(c) All expansion, extension, maintenance, or repair activities of nonconforming structures or
improvements shall be consistent with all other provisions of this SMP; provided, that the
Page 176 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 125
cumulative cost of such maintenance or repair shall not exceed 20 percent of the assessed
valuation of such building, structure, or land (as applicable) at the time such maintenance is
completed.
(d) When damaged, a nonconforming structure may be restored to the configuration existing
immediately prior to the time that the structure was damaged; provided, that:
(i) The structure is damaged to an extent not exceeding 50 percent of the replacement cost
of the original development.
(ii) The applicant applies for permits needed to restore the development within six months
of the date the damage occurred.
(iii) Reconstruction is started within 12 months and is completed within 24 months of the
date of damage, unless an extension of time is granted by the Shoreline Administrator upon
written petition substantiating to the satisfaction of the Administrator due cause for such
extension.
(iv) The degree of the nonconforming use, building, or structure is not increased.
(e) Nothing in this section will prohibit vertical expansion up to the height allowed in the
applicable use environment, provided all other applicable requirements of City’s development
regulations are met.
(f) Upkeep, repairs, and maintenance of a nonconforming structure or other improvement
shall be permitted.
(2) Should such structure or other improvement be moved for any reason for any distance, it shall
thereafter conform to the regulations for the use environment in which it is located. Conformance
shall be required when:
(a) A change of use is proposed;
(b) The use is terminated or discontinued for more than one year, or the structure(s) that
houses the use is vacated for more than one year; or
(c) The structure(s) or activity that occurs on the land in which the use is conducted is
proposed for relocation.
(3) Residential structures and appurtenant structures that were legally established and are used
for a conforming use, but that do not meet standards for the following, shall be considered a
conforming structure: setbacks, buffers, or yards; area; bulk; height; or density.
(4) For purposes of this section, “appurtenant structures” refer to garages, sheds, and other legally
established structures. Appurtenant structures do not include bulkheads and other shoreline
modifications or overwater structures.
29.30.040 Nonconforming lots.
(1) A nonconforming lot may be developed if permitted by other land use regulations of the local
government and so long as such development conforms to all other requirements of the applicable
master program and the act.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.620.]
Chapter 29.35
ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT
Sections:
29.35.010 Roles and responsibilities.
Page 177 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 126
29.35.020 Interpretation.
29.35.030 Statutory noticing requirements.
29.35.040 Application requirements.
29.35.050 Shoreline substantial development permits.
29.35.060 Shoreline special use permits.
29.35.070 Shoreline variance permits.
29.35.080 Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permits.
29.35.090 Duration of permits.
29.35.100 Initiation of development.
29.35.110 Review process.
29.35.120 Appeals.
29.35.130 Amendments to permits.
29.35.140 Enforcement.
29.35.150 Cumulative effects of shoreline developments.
29.35.160 Amendments to shoreline master program.
29.35.170 Shoreline environment designation maps or official shoreline map.
29.35.010 Roles and responsibilities.
(1) Shoreline Administrator.
(a) The Community and Economic Development Director of the City of Pasco or his/her
designee shall serve as the Shoreline Administrator. The Shoreline Administrator shall issue
written shoreline exemptions as appropriate, and, in the case of a shoreline substantial
development permit, grant or deny the permit. The Shoreline Administrator shall administer
the shoreline permit and notification systems, and shall be responsible for coordinating the
administration of shoreline regulations with zoning enforcement, building permits, and all
other regulations regarding land use and development in the City.
(b) The Shoreline Administrator shall be familiar with regulatory measures pertaining to
shorelines and their use, and, within the limits of his or her authority, shall cooperate in the
administration of these measures. Permits issued under the provisions of this shoreline
regulation shall be coordinated with other applicable land use and development regulatory
measures of the City. The Shoreline Administrator shall establish procedures that advise all
parties seeking building permits or other development authorization of the need to consider
possible shoreline applications. It is the intent of the City, consistent with its regulatory
obligations, to simplify and facilitate the processing of shoreline substantial development
permits.
(c) The Shoreline Administrator shall ensure that proposed regulatory or administrative
actions do not unconstitutionally infringe upon private property rights. Shoreline goals and
policies should be pursued through the regulation of development of private property only to
an extent that is consistent with all relevant constitutional and other legal limitations (where
applicable, statutory limitations, such as those contained in Chapter 82.02 RCW and RCW
43.21C.060) on the regulation of private property.
(d) The Shoreline Administrator shall apply PMC 29.25.010, Critical Areas.
(2) Hearing Examiner.
(a) The Hearing Examiner shall have the authority to decide on appeals from administrative
decisions issued by the Shoreline Administrator of this SMP.
(b) The Hearing Examiner may grant or deny shoreline variances following a public hearing.
Page 178 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 127
(c) The Hearing Examiner shall have authority to review and approve or deny shoreline
special use permits following an open record hearing pursuant to PMC 25.210.080.
(3) Planning Commission. The Planning Commission is vested with the responsibility to review
the SMP as part of regular SMP updates required by RCW 90.58.080 as a major element of the
City’s planning and regulatory program and make recommendations for amendments thereof to
the City Council.
(4) City Council. The City Council is vested with authority to:
(a) Initiate an amendment to this SMP according to the procedures prescribed in WAC 173-
26-100.
(b) Adopt all amendments to this SMP, after consideration of the recommendation of the
Planning Commission. Substantive amendments shall become effective immediately upon
adoption by Ecology.
(c) Conduct closed record appeal of any recommendation of the Hearing Examiner pursuant
to PMC 25.210.070.
(d) Decide on appeals from the administrative decisions issued by the Shoreline
Administrator.
[Ord. 4496A § 13, 2020; Ord. 4496 § 13, 2020; Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.700.]
29.35.020 Interpretation.
(1) Under the administrative provisions, the Shoreline Administrator shall have authority to
interpret this SMP, when such interpretation is clearly consistent with the goals and policies of this
SMP and the SMA.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator shall consult with Ecology if formal written interpretations are
developed as a result of a lack of clear guidance in the SMA, the SMP guidelines, or this SMP to
ensure that any are consistent with the purpose and intent of Chapter 90.58 RCW and Chapter 173-
26 WAC.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.710.]
29.35.030 Statutory noticing requirements.
(1) At a minimum, the Shoreline Administrator shall provide notice in accordance with WAC
173-27-110 and may provide for additional noticing requirements.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.720.]
29.35.040 Application requirements.
(1) A complete application for a shoreline substantial development, shoreline special use, or
shoreline variance permit shall contain, at a minimum, the information listed in WAC 173-27-180.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator shall provide written informational materials, procedures,
instructions, and forms required to submit an application for a shoreline substantial development
permit, variance permit, or special use permit.
(3) These materials should include: a plan coversheet; a joint aquatic resource permits application
(JARPA) form; a SEPA checklist; a fee schedule; review criteria; and the process and timelines to
assist potential applicants and interested parties on the permit application submittal and review
process.
Page 179 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 128
(4) The Shoreline Administrator may vary or waive these requirements according to
administrative application requirements on a case-by-case basis.
(5) The Shoreline Administrator may require additional specific information depending on the
nature of the proposal and the presence of sensitive ecological features or issues related to
compliance with other applicable requirements and the provisions of this SMP.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.730.]
29.35.050 Shoreline substantial development permits.
(1) A shoreline substantial development permit shall be required for all development on
shorelines, unless the proposal is specifically exempted per PMC 29.35.080. Shoreline substantial
development permits shall be processed as an administrative permit.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator shall review substantial development permit applications, as
required in PMC 29.35.040, and approve or deny the permit.
(3) The Shoreline Administrator shall provide notice in accordance with WAC 173-27-110 and
may provide additional notice, according to the City’s noticing requirements.
(4) A shoreline substantial development permit shall be granted only when the development
proposed is consistent with:
(a) The policies and procedures of the SMA, Chapter 90.58 RCW;
(b) The applicable provisions of Chapter 173-27 WAC; and
(c) This SMP.
(5) The Shoreline Administrator may attach conditions to the approval of permits as necessary to
ensure consistency of the project with the SMA and this SMP.
(6) Nothing shall interfere with the City’s ability to require compliance with all other applicable
plans and laws.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.740.]
29.35.060 Shoreline special use permits.
(1) Uses specifically classified or set forth in this SMP as conditional uses shall be subject to
review and condition by the Shoreline Administrator and Ecology. Applications for a shoreline
special use permit shall be processed pursuant to Chapter 25.200 PMC.
(2) Other uses, which are not classified or listed or set forth in this SMP, may be authorized as
conditional uses; provided, the applicant can demonstrate consistency with the requirements of
this Section and the requirements for conditional uses contained in this SMP.
(3) Uses that are specifically prohibited by this SMP may not be authorized as a conditional use.
(4) Review Criteria for Shoreline Special Use Permit. Uses that are classified or set forth in the
applicable SMP as conditional uses may be authorized provided that the applicant demonstrates
all of the following:
(a) That the proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the SMP;
(b) That the proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of public shorelines;
(c) That the proposed use of the site and design of the project are compatible with other
authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the Comprehensive
Plan and SMP;
(d) That the proposed use will cause no significant adverse effects to the shoreline
environment in which it is to be located; and
Page 180 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 129
(e) That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect.
(5) In the granting of all shoreline special use permits, consideration shall be given to the
cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. For example, if shoreline
special use permits were granted for other developments in the area where similar circumstances
exist, the total of the conditional uses shall also remain consistent with the policies of RCW
90.58.020 and shall not produce substantial adverse effects to the shoreline environment.
(6) In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached to the permit by the City
or Ecology to prevent undesirable effects of the proposed use and/or to ensure consistency of the
project with the SMA and this SMP.
(7) Nothing shall interfere with the City’s ability to require compliance with all other applicable
plans and laws.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.750.]
29.35.070 Shoreline variance permits.
(1) The purpose of a variance is to grant relief to specific bulk, dimensional, or performance
requirements set forth in this SMP where there are extraordinary or unique circumstances relating
to the property such that the strict implementation of this SMP would impose unnecessary
hardships on the applicant or thwart the policies set forth in RCW 90.58.020. Variances from the
use regulations of the SMP are prohibited. Applications for shoreline variance permits shall be
processed pursuant to PMC 25.195.020 and subsection (2) of this section.
(2) Review Criteria.
(a) Shoreline variance permits should be granted in circumstances where denial of the permit
would result in a thwarting of the policy enumerated in RCW 90.58.020. In all instances, the
applicant must demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances shall be shown and the public
interest shall suffer no substantial detrimental effect.
(b) Shoreline variance permits for development and/or uses that will be located landward of
the OHWM, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(b), and/or landward of any wetland, as defined
in RCW 90.58.030(2)(h), may be authorized provided the applicant can demonstrate all of the
following:
(i) That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional, or performance standards set forth
in the SMP precludes, or significantly interferes with, reasonable use of the property;
(ii) That the hardship described in subsection (2)(b)(i) of this subsection is specifically
related to the property and is the result of unique conditions, such as irregular lot shape,
size, or natural features, and the application of the SMP, and not, for example, from deed
restrictions or the applicant’s own actions;
(iii) That the design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses within the area
and with uses planned for the area under the Comprehensive Plan and SMP and will not
cause adverse impacts on the shoreline environment;
(iv) That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the
other properties in the area;
(v) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to afford relief; and
(vi) That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect.
(c) Shoreline variance permits for development and/or uses that will be located waterward of
the OHWM, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(b), or within any wetland, as defined in RCW
Page 181 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 130
90.58.030(2)(h), may be authorized provided the applicant can demonstrate all of the
following:
(i) That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional, or performance standards set forth
in the applicable SMP precludes all reasonable use of the property;
(ii) That the proposal is consistent with the criteria established under subsections (2)(b)(i)
through (2)(b)(iv) of this section; and
(iii) That the public rights of navigation and use of the shorelines will not be adversely
affected.
(d) In the granting of all shoreline variance permits, consideration shall be given to the
cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. For example, if variances
were granted to other developments and/or uses in the area where similar circumstances exist,
the total of the variances shall also remain consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and
shall not cause substantial adverse effects to the shoreline environment.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.760.]
29.35.080 Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permits.
(1) An exemption from the shoreline substantial development permit process is not an exemption
from compliance with the SMA or this SMP, or from any other regulatory requirements. All
proposed uses, activities, or development occurring within shoreline jurisdiction must conform to
the intent and requirements of Chapter 90.58 RCW, the SMA, and this SMP, whether or not a
permit or other form of authorization is required.
(2) Letters of exemption shall be issued by the Shoreline Administrator when an exemption
applies or when a letter of exemption is required by the provisions of WAC 173-27-050 and as
follows:
(a) Any person claiming exemption from the substantial development permit requirements
shall make an application to the Shoreline Administrator for such an exemption in the manner
prescribed by the Shoreline Administrator, except that no written statement of exemption is
required for emergency development pursuant to WAC 173-27-040(2)(d).
(b) The Shoreline Administrator is authorized to grant or deny requests for statements of
exemption from the shoreline substantial development permit requirement for uses and
developments within shorelines that are specifically listed in subsection (4) of this section. The
statement shall be in writing and shall indicate the specific exemption of this SMP that is being
applied to the development and shall provide a summary of the Shoreline Administrator’s
analysis of the consistency of the project with this SMP and the SMA. The letter shall be sent
to the applicant and maintained on file in the offices of the Shoreline Administrator.
(c) Statements of exemption may contain conditions and/or mitigating measures of approval
to achieve consistency and compliance with the provisions of this SMP and the SMA.
(d) A denial of an exemption shall be in writing and shall identify the reason(s) for the denial.
The Shoreline Administrator’s decision may be appealed pursuant to PMC 29.35.120, Appeals.
(e) Exempt activities requiring a JARPA shall not be conducted until a statement of
exemption has been obtained from the Shoreline Administrator.
(3) Interpretations of Exemptions.
(a) Exemptions shall be construed narrowly. Only those developments that meet the precise
terms of one or more of the listed exemptions may be granted exemption from the shoreline
substantial development permit process.
Page 182 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 131
(b) A development or use that is listed as a conditional use pursuant to this SMP, or is an
unlisted use, must obtain a shoreline special use permit even though the development or use
does not require a shoreline substantial development permit. When a development or use is
proposed that does not comply with the bulk, dimensional, and performance standards of this
SMP, such development or use can only be authorized by approval of a shoreline variance
permit.
(c) The burden of proof that a development or use is exempt from the permit process is on the
applicant.
(d) If any part of a proposed development is not eligible for exemption, then a shoreline
substantial development permit is required for the entire proposed development project.
(e) The Shoreline Administrator may attach conditions to the approval of exempted
developments and/or uses as necessary to ensure consistency of the project with the SMA and
this SMP. Additionally, nothing shall interfere with each responsible local government’s
ability to require compliance with all other applicable laws and plans.
(4) The City shall exempt from the shoreline substantial development permit requirement the
shoreline developments listed below:
(a) (a) Any development of which the total cost or fair market value does not exceed eight
thousand, five hundred, four dollars ($8,504) $6,416 or as adjusted by the State Office of
Financial Management, if such development does not materially interfere with the normal
public use of the water or shorelines of the state. For purposes of determining whether or not
a permit is required, the total cost or fair market value shall be based on the value of
development that is occurring on shorelines of the state as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(c).
The total cost or fair market value of the development shall include the fair market value of
any donated, contributed, or found labor, as well as equipment, or materials.
(b) Normal maintenance or repair of existing legally established structures or developments,
including damage by accident, fire, or elements. Replacement of a structure or development
may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common method of repair for the
type of structure or development and the replacement structure or development is comparable
to the original structure or development, including, but not limited to, its size, shape,
configuration, location, and external appearance and the replacement does not cause substantial
adverse effects to shoreline resources or environment.
(c) Construction of a normal protective bulkhead common to single-family residences. A
normal protective bulkhead includes those structural and nonstructural developments installed
at or near, and parallel to, the OHWM for the sole purpose of protecting an existing single-
family residence and appurtenant structures from loss or damage by erosion. A normal
protective bulkhead is not exempt if constructed for the purpose of creating dry land. When a
vertical or nearly vertical wall is being constructed or reconstructed, not more than one cubic
yard of fill per one foot of wall may be used as backfill. When an existing bulkhead is being
repaired by construction of a vertical wall fronting the existing wall, it shall be constructed no
farther waterward of the existing bulkhead than is necessary for construction of new footings.
When a bulkhead has deteriorated such that an OHWM has been established by the presence
and action of water landward of the bulkhead, then the replacement bulkhead must be located
at or near the actual OHWM. Bioengineered erosion control projects may be considered a
normal protective bulkhead when any structural elements are consistent with the above
requirements and when the project has been approved by WDFW.
Page 183 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 132
(d) Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements. An
emergency is an unanticipated and imminent threat to public health, safety, or the environment
that requires immediate action within a time too short to allow full compliance with this SMP.
Emergency construction does not include development of new permanent protective structures
where none previously existed. Where new protective structures are deemed by the Shoreline
Administrator to be the appropriate means to address the emergency situation, and upon
abatement of the emergency situation, the new structure shall be removed, or any permit that
would have been required, absent an emergency, pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, these
regulations, or this SMP, shall be obtained. All emergency construction shall be consistent
with the policies and requirements of this section, Chapter 90.58 RCW, and this SMP. As a
general matter, flooding or other seasonal events that can be anticipated and may occur but that
are not imminent are not an emergency.
(i) The following criteria shall exist to qualify any action under an emergency provision:
(A) There must be an immediate threat to life, or public or private property, or an
immediate threat of serious environmental degradation arising from a natural condition,
or nonnatural accident or incident;
(B) The emergency response shall be confined to the action necessary to protect life
or property from damage;
(C) The scope of the emergency response must be limited to the work necessary to
relieve the immediate threat; and
(D) The emergency response applies only to the period of time in which the actual
emergency exists.
(ii) Once the emergency is abated or dissipated as deemed by jurisdictional authorities,
compliance with the requirements of this section is required.
(iii) Emergency actions shall use reasonable methods that minimize the impact to critical
areas and their buffers. Persons who take emergency action shall notify the Shoreline
Administrator within one working day following commencement of the emergency
activity. Following such notification, the Shoreline Administrator shall determine if the
action taken was within the scope and definition of emergency actions as defined above. If
the Shoreline Administrator determines the action taken or any part of the action taken was
beyond the scope and definition of allowed emergency actions, then the enforcement
provisions of PMC 29.35.140 shall apply.
(e) Construction and practices normal or necessary for farming, irrigation, and ranching
activities, including agricultural service roads and utilities on shorelands and the construction
and maintenance of irrigation structures, including but not limited to head gates, pumping
facilities, and irrigation channels. A feedlot of any size, all processing plants, other activities
of a commercial nature, and alteration of the contour of the shorelands by leveling or filling,
other than that which results from normal cultivation, shall not be considered normal or
necessary farming or ranching activities.
(f) Construction or modification of navigational aids, such as channel markers and anchor
buoys.
(g) Construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family
residence or appurtenance for their own use or for the use of their family, which residence does
not exceed a height of 35 feet above average grade level and which meets all requirements of
the City, other than requirements imposed pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Construction
authorized under this exemption shall be located landward of the OHWM.
Page 184 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 133
(h) Construction of a dock, including a community dock designed for pleasure craft only and
for the private non-commercial use of the owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-
family or multiple-family residence. A dock is a landing and moorage facility for watercraft
and does not include recreational decks, storage facilities or other appurtenances. This
exception applies when the fair market value of the dock does not exceed:
i. Twenty-two thousand five hundred dollars ($22,500) for docks that are constructed to
replace existing docks, are of equal or lesser square footage than the existing dock being
replaced; or
ii. Eleven thousand two hundred ($11,200) dollars for all other docks constructed in fresh
waters.
iii. However, if subsequent construction occurs within five years of completion of the
prior construction, and the combined fair market value of the subsequent and prior
construction exceeds the amount specified above, the subsequent construction shall be
considered a substantial development for the purpose of this chapter.$10,000, but if
subsequent construction having a fair market value exceeding $2,500 occurs within five
years of completion of the prior construction, the subsequent construction shall be
considered a substantial development for the purpose of this section.
(i) Operation, maintenance, repair, or construction of canals, waterways, drains, reservoirs,
or other facilities that now exist or are hereafter created or developed as a part of an irrigation
system for the primary purpose of making use of system waters, including return flow and
artificially stored groundwater from the irrigation of lands.
(j) The marking of property lines or corners on state-owned lands, when such marking does
not significantly interfere with normal public use of the surface of the water.
(k) Operation and maintenance of existing and future systems of dikes, drains, or other
facilities existing on September 8, 1975, where water is being drained from irrigation runoff
or shallow groundwater levels artificially recharged through irrigation, and that are created,
developed or utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or diking system.
(l) Any project with a certification from the Governor pursuant to Chapter 80.50 RCW
(certification from the State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council).
(m) Site exploration and investigation activities that are prerequisite to preparation of an
application for development authorization under this section, if:
(i) The activity does not interfere with the normal public use of surface waters;
(ii) The activity will have no significant adverse impact on the environment, including,
but not limited to, fish, wildlife, fish or wildlife habitat, water quality, and aesthetic values;
(iii) The activity does not involve the installation of any structure and, upon completion
of the activity, the vegetation and land configuration of the site are restored to conditions
existing before the activity; and
(iv) A private entity seeking development authorization under this section first posts a
performance bond or provides other evidence of financial responsibility to the local
jurisdiction to ensure that the site is restored to pre-existing conditions.
(m) (n) The process of removing or controlling aquatic noxious weeds, as defined in RCW
17.26.020, through the use of an herbicide or other treatment methods applicable to weed
control published by the Departments of Agriculture or Ecology jointly with other state
agencies under Chapter 43.21C RCW.
(n) (o) Watershed restoration projects as defined in RCW 89.08.460.
Page 185 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 134
(o) (p) A public or private project that is designed to improve fish or wildlife habitat or fish
passage consistent with RCW 90.58.147 and RCW 77.55. when all of the following apply:
(i) The project has been approved by WDFW;
(ii) The project has received HPA (hydraulic project approval) by WDFW pursuant to
Chapter 77.55 RCW;
(iii) The City has determined that the project is substantially consistent with the local
SMP. The City shall make such determination in a timely manner and provide it by letter
to the applicant; and
(iv) Fish habitat enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of RCW 77.55.181
are determined to be consistent with local SMPs.
(q) Any person conducting a remedial action at a facility pursuant to a consent decree, order,
or agreed order issued pursuant to Chapter 70.105D RCW or to Ecology when it conducts a
remedial action under Chapter 70.105D RCW.
(p) (r) Other than conversions to nonforest land use, forest practices regulated under Chapter
76.09 RCW are not subject to additional regulations under the SMA or this SMP (RCW
90.58.030(2)(d)(ii)).
(q) The external or internal retrofitting of an existing structure with the exclusive purpose of
compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.)
or to otherwise provide physical access to the structure by individuals with disabilities.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.770.]
29.35.090 Duration of permits.
(1) The duration of permits shall be consistent with WAC 173-27-090 as follows:
(a) Construction activities shall be commenced or, where no construction activities are
involved, the use or activity shall be commenced within two years of the effective date of a
substantial development permit. The City may authorize a single extension for a period not to
exceed one year based on reasonable factors if a request for extension has been filed before the
expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record on the
substantial development permit and to the Department.
(b) Authorization to conduct development activities shall terminate five years after the
effective date of a substantial development permit. However, the City may authorize a single
extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors if a request for
extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is
given to parties of record and to the Department. [Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970
§ 29.01.780.]
29.35.100 Initiation of development.
(1) Each permit for a substantial development, shoreline special use, or shoreline variance issued
by local government shall contain a provision that construction pursuant to the permit shall not
begin and is not authorized until 21 days from the date of receipt filing with Ecology as defined in
RCW 90.58.140(6) and WAC 173-27-130, or until all review proceedings initiated within 21 days
from the date of receipt filing of the decision. The date of filing for a substantial development
permit is the date of actual receipt by Ecology of a local government’s final decision on the permit.
With regard to a permit for a shoreline variance or a shoreline special use, date of filing means the
date a responsible local government or applicant receives the written decision of Ecology. When
Page 186 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 135
a substantial development permit and a special use or variance permit are required for a
development, the submittal on the permits shall be made concurrently.
(2) Permits for substantial development, shoreline special use, or shoreline variance may be in
any form prescribed and used by the City, including a combined permit application form. Such
forms will be supplied by the City.
(3) A permit data sheet shall be submitted to Ecology with each shoreline permit. The permit data
sheet form shall be consistent with WAC 173-27-990.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.790.]
29.35.110 Review process.
(1) After the City’s approval of a shoreline special use or variance permit, the City shall submit
the permit to Ecology for approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Ecology shall render and
transmit to the City and the applicant its final decision approving, approving with conditions, or
disapproving the permit within 30 days of the date of submittal by the City pursuant to WAC 173-
27-110.
(2) Ecology shall review the complete file submitted by the City on shoreline special use or
variance permits and any other information submitted or available that is relevant to the
application. Ecology shall base its determination to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a
special use permit or variance permit on consistency with the policy and provisions of the SMA
and except as provided in WAC 173-27-210 and the criteria in WAC 173-27-160 and 173-27-170.
(3) The City shall provide timely notification of Ecology’s final decision to those interested
persons having requested notification from local government pursuant to WAC 173-27-130.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.800.]
29.35.120 Appeals.
(1) Appeals of Shoreline Permit Decisions. The City’s decisions on shoreline permits may be
appealed to the following bodies in this sequence:
(a) Pasco City Council in accordance with PMC 25.200.110.
(b) State Shorelines Hearings Board (SHB) in Tumwater.
(c) SHB decisions may be appealed to superior court.
(d) Superior court decisions may be appealed to the Court of Appeals.
(e) Appeals Court decisions may be appealed to the Washington Supreme Court.
(f) Appeals to the SHB and courts are governed by RCW 90.58.180, RCW 43.21B.001,
Chapter 34.05 RCW Part V, and Chapter 461-08 WAC.
(2) All requests for review of any final permit decisions under Chapter 90.58 RCW and Chapter
173-27 WAC are governed by the procedures established in RCW 90.58.180, Chapter 461-08
WAC, and the rules of practice and procedure of the SHB.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.810.]
29.35.130 Amendments to permits.
(1) A permit revision is required whenever the applicant proposes substantive changes to the
design, terms, or conditions of a project from that which is approved in the permit. Changes are
substantive if they materially alter the project in a manner that relates to its conformance to the
Page 187 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 136
terms and conditions of the permit, the SMP, and/or the policies and provisions of Chapter 90.58
RCW. Changes that are not substantive in effect do not require approval of a revision.
(2) Revisions to permits shall be considered consistent with WAC 173-27-100.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.820.]
29.35.140 Enforcement.
(1) The SMA provides for a cooperative program between the City and Ecology to implement
and enforce the provisions of the SMA and this SMP. This section provides for a variety of means
of enforcement, including civil and criminal penalties, orders to cease and desist, and orders to
take corrective action, in accordance with WAC 173-27-270, 173-27-280, 173-27-290, and 173-
27-300, and Chapter 25.10 PMC. The enforcement means and penalties provided herein are not
exclusive and may be taken or imposed in conjunction with, or in addition to, any other civil
enforcement actions and civil penalties, injunctive or declaratory relief, criminal prosecution,
actions to recover civil or criminal penalties, or any other action or sanction authorized by this
section, or any other provision of the PMC, or any other provision of state or federal law and
regulation.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator, with the assistance of the City Attorney, shall have authority to
commence and prosecute any enforcement action authorized by this section. In determining the
appropriate enforcement actions to be commenced and prosecuted, the Shoreline Administrator
shall consider the following factors:
(a) The nature of the violation;
(b) The extent of damage or potential future risk to the shoreline environment and its
ecological functions or to the public health and safety, caused by or resulting from, whether
directly or indirectly, the alleged violation;
(c) The existence of knowledge, intent, or malice on behalf of the violator;
(d) The economic benefit or advantage that accrued to the violator(s) as a result of the
violation; and
(e) The estimated actions and costs of providing adequate mitigation, restoration,
rehabilitation, or enhancement to repair or minimize any substantial adverse impacts upon the
shoreline environment and its ecological functions or the public health and safety.
(3) The Shoreline Administrator may commence and prosecute enforcement action jointly with
Ecology. Pursuant to Chapter 173-27 WAC, Ecology may initiate and prosecute enforcement
action separate from the Shoreline Administrator.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.830.]
29.35.150 Cumulative effects of shoreline developments.
(1) The City will periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the SMP update for achieving no net
loss of shoreline ecological functions with respect to shoreline permitting and exemptions. At the
end of the first full year after adoption, and at the end of every other year thereafter, the Shoreline
Administrator shall prepare a report documenting shoreline substantial development permits,
special use permits, and variances, including the exempt use activity approvals and the locations
and effects of each by type and classifications. The report should include activities involving
development, conservation, restoration, mitigation, and enforcement. It should summarize the net
change of developments (including new development and decommissioning of structures and
Page 188 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 137
protected areas) using indicators, such as linear length of stabilization and flood hazard structures,
number of overwater structures (e.g., piers and docks), road length within shoreline, number of
water body road crossings, number of levees/dikes, acres of impervious surface areas, acres of
vegetation, acres of permanently protected areas, or areas with limited development. Compliance
and enforcement activity will also be tracked.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator Official will, to the extent feasible, coordinate with other City
departments or adjacent jurisdictions to assess cumulative effects of shoreline development.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.840.]
29.35.160 Amendments to shoreline master program.
(1) Amendments to the SMP shall be processed as legislative decisions pursuant to Chapters
24.88 and 25.210 PMC and WAC 173-26-110.
(2) Any locally approved amendments to the SMP will not become effective until approved by
Ecology.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.850.]
29.35.170 Shoreline environment designation maps or official shoreline map.
[Ord. 4314 § 2, 2016; Code 1970 § 29.01.860.]
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word
of this ordinance should be held to the invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or word of this ordinance.
Section 4. Corrections. Upon approval by the city attorney, the city clerk or the code
reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including scrivener’s errors
or clerical mistakes; reference to other local, state, or feral laws, rules, or regulations; or numbering
or referencing of ordinances or their sections and subsections.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days
after approval, passage and publication as required by law.
Page 189 of 412
Ordinance – Amending PMC Title 29 - 138
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, on this ___ day of _____,
202_.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Published: _____________________________
Page 190 of 412
1 PiSco
CALL TO ORDER
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
City Hall -Council Chambers
525 North Third Avenue
Pasco, Washington
THURSDAY, APRIL 20, 2023
6:30PM
City of Pasco Planning Commission meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m., by Chair Jerry
Cochran.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chair Cochran led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: Rosa Torres, Mitchell Moffitt, Dana Crutchfield, Kim Lehrman, Abel
Campos, Jay Hendler and Jerry Cochran, a quorum was declared.
Commissioners Excused: Paul Mendez and Rachel Teel.
Staff Present: Community & Economic Development Director Rick White, and Planner Manager
Jacob Gonzalez, Administrative Assistant II, Carmen Patrick.
WELCOME AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Chair Cochran explained the Planning Commission is an advisory board made up of volunteers
appointed by City Council.
He further explained the purpose of the Planning Commission was to provide recommendations to
City Council regarding changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Updates, Block Grant
Allocations and Zoning Code. The Planning Commission is tasked with considering the long-term
growth and development of the community, the impact of land use decisions on community,
livability, economic opportunity, housing affordability, public services, and the environment.
Chair Cochran reminded the audience tonight's proceedings were being broadcast live on City of
Pasco's Facebook page and on Charter Cable PSC Channel 191 and will be rebroadcast several times
during the next month.
He stated the meeting was also being recorded and could be watched on City of Pasco's website,
which is Pasco-wa.gov. Click on the VIDEO ON DEMAND link and make your selection there.
Chair Cochran stated copies of the meeting agenda were available on the back table. He then asked
that everyone silence cell phones to prevent interruptions during the meeting. For those present this
evening, when you are given the opportunity to address the Commission, please come to the podium,
speak clearly into the microphone, and state your name and city of address for the record.
Chair Cochran reminded the audience and the Planning Commission that Washington State Law
requires public meetings like the one being held this evening not only be fair, but also appear to be
fair. In addition, Washington State Law prohibits Planning Commission members from participating
in discussions or decisions in which the member may have a direct interest or may be either benefited
or harmed by the Planning Commission's decision. An objection to any Planning Commission
member hearing any matter on tonight's agenda needs to be aired at this time or it will be waived.
Chair Cochran asked if there were any Planning Commission members who have a declaration at
this time regarding any of the items on the agenda.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page I of6 April 20, 2023
Page 191 of 412
❖ No declarations were made.
Chair Cochran asked if anyone in the audience objected to any Planning Commission member
hearing any of the items on the agenda.
❖ None heard, record shows there were no declarations.
Chair Cochran stated the Planning Commission needed and valued public input explaining it helped
the Commission understand the issues more clearly and allowed for better recommendations to City
Council. Furthermore, in many cases, this could be the only forum for the public to get facts and
opinions placed into the official record and City Council will use to make the Commission's
decision. He encouraged those present to take full advantage ofthis opportunity.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Lehrman moved to approve the Planning Commission meeting minutes of March 16,
2023, Commissioner Moffitt seconded, and the motion carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Report Shoreline Master Plan Periodic Update
Ben Floyd with White Bluffs Consulting gave the commission an update for the Shoreline Master
Plan.
Overview of SMP Update Process:
► Last updated in 2015
o Mr. Floyd was the project manager on the effort as well.
► Local agency & public outreach
o This has been done as part of this process.
► Prepare changes in joint review process with WA Dept. of Ecology
o We've worked very closely with Washington State Department of Ecology,
Heather has been working with us on this along with Jeremy Sykes. So many of
the changes that we've been sharing with you, we've also been discussing with
Department of Ecology because they also have to approve this program along
with the city.
► 60-Day Dept. of Commerce Notice (2/24/23-4/25/23)
o We also worked with staff to issue a notice to State Department of Commerce
for all of the agencies in the state to review. And that 60 day review period is
coming to a close.
► Local Adaptation of SMP limited amendments after Ecology Determination of
Consistency issued.
► Deadline for Adoption is June 30, 2023.
Mr. Floyd stated there is a step once if the Planning Commission approves recommendation to
Council for approval of the Shoreline Master Program, the next step will be to take all of the
administrative record and we provide that information to Ecology and ask them to make an initial
determination. If we're in compliance with the state laws and regulations, and then they get back to
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2 of6 April 20, 2023
Page 192 of 412
the City. And then if we get a positive response back that the Shoreline Master program is in
compliance, then we can proceed with the approval process locally.
We have a checklist that Ecology has provided for us, and we use that to come up with the
amendments. That's different laws and regulations that have changed since the 2015 adopted
Shoreline Master Program. We also considered local planning needs and made some minor changes
for consistency and clarity, kind of cleaning up a few of the things that would make it read more
clearly.
Draft Revisions:
► Reference current state law for fish passage improvement projects
► Update dollar values for "development" and for dock using latest State Office of
Financial Management information.
► Clarify that only removing structures is not considered "development."
► Add exceptions for remedial actions, boatyard improvements, and WSDOT projects.
► Add new section for non-conforming lots.
Next steps, so tonight is the hearing. Public comment be received through the 25th. We'll prepare a
comment response summary. We'll request that initial determination from Ecology. We'll hope to
hear a positive thumbs up from Ecology, that the changes are consistent with state law and
regulations. And then we hope to be able to go through the City adoption process where the Council
takes action. The final Shoreline Master program will go to Ecology. After that there will be appeal
period, then after the appeal peric;,d, if there is an appeal, then the Shoreline Master program will be
considered approved and final for the City.
❖ Comments/Questions from Commissioners
Commissioner Moffitt asked about the process, which Mr. Floyd reviewed with the Commission
agam.
Commissioner Lehrman asked the task still not to be ADA compliant? Mr. Floyd responded that
the compliance does not require a permit.
Commissioner Crutchfield asked is the Corps of Engineers factoring in here with the Department
of Ecology? Mr. Floyd answered we factored in the US. Army Corps of Engineers in terms of
ownership, we clarified that federal activity on federal land is outside of shoreline jurisdiction.
Commissioner Torres asked if there were any consequences if we don't meet the June 30th
deadline. Mr. Floyd stated no there isn't. The grant funding runs out, but we will work with
the City to make sure if we have to provide support beyond that date, we are happy to do that.
❖ Public Comment
C ynthia Muse 10816 W. Court St.
My name is Cynthia Muse. Live in the county 65 years, but I also am joint owner of my father's
estate at 106 West Court Street in Pasco. And so, yes, we are City residents, City household
owners in Pasco. I'm here because we love the Shoreline. And my father's legacy is going to
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 3 of6 April20,2023
Page 193 of 412
include anything that we can do for more public access to the Shoreline, and I think not to this
council, but to the City Council. I had brought once before all the master shoreline plans for the
county of Franklin River Shore Linkage Plan, McNary Shoreline Plan, Tri-City River Shore
Master Plan and then the Shoreline City of Pasco Master Plan. This is beautiful material, and it
all coordinates and is unified in its efforts to do great things for the Shoreline. And so, my
question is, why are these not being followed after all these years?
Some of the aspects of this that some of us that are just ordinary lay citizens see the glaring
difficulties of not following some of this as we interpret it. And one of them is, of course, the
public access issue. And we saw that. First of all, I became involved with 29.01.260 Public
Access when the Franklin County Irrigation District was being developed for residential lots
from an old historic place that was so much enjoyed for open space. And so that's where we first
started to make a lot of noise and formed a group to work against this kind of thing ever
happening again.
Then it addresses public access again. Right upriver here, we're going to probably be facing that
where it's 29.01 .420 at number eight. New multi-unit residential developments and subdivision
length into five or more lots shall make adequate provisions for public access consistent with
regulations. Okay, you've got that Columbia Point Development, I think that's what it's called,
the old Harris Farm. And where is the public access visually and physically for that? Now, I
know the Shoreline resident people don't want that, but to try to get past all their docks and
everything, I don't think it's going to be much of an issue. Most of us in Kayaks found that out
have to swerve way out around all those docks.
But anyway, the public access is such an important element ofliving in a community that's based
on a river that runs through it, is the crown jewel of all of Eastern Washington. It's a matter of
interpretation as to how these are interpreted, how they're used or abused. And so, we as public
citizens are going to keep watchdogging this stuff, but we're not lawyers. Well, some ofus are
in our group are not lawyers, but we are going to keep at this. And hopefully you'll agree with
us that public access is critical and that we have to ensure that it happens at all costs for visual
and physical access to the river and river shores and that they're kept public as much as possible
and not developed. Thank you.
Pete Reeke, 914 W Pooter St.
So, I'm Pete Reeke. I live at 914 W Pooter Street, yellow house with a wheelchair ramp. That's
more detail than you need, by the way. That area is called the Richland Band on the west side
of Pasco in the Broadmoor area. And secondly, before the public comment period is over, I think
would be really inappropriate for you guys to take action tonight. So, I'm glad you decided not
to do so. I submitted my comments. You should probably all get a copy of those at some point.
I submitted them to Jacob and to Jeremy Sykes, and I won't go through those in any great detail,
but I must say I had an enormous amount of fun reading through the Shoreline Master Plan
program, and it was very educational.
And I think there are a lot of things where the way that we practice it needs to be changed as
much as the wording in the document. So really, you can read my comments here. I have them
all numbered according to the numbering in the document, which seems a little strange because
the actual Pasco Municipal Code that's numbered in the document doesn't actually match the
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page4 of6 April 20, 2023
Page 194 of 412
Pasco Municipal Code that's on the website.
So, there are still some editorial things that need to go on there, or perhaps I don't understand
how that process works in specifics.
But let me only comment on one particular item here. And I forgot my glasses tonight, so I'm
going to have to kind of hold this a long way up in front of me here, but section 29.01.770 D,
lB. There's a new addition to the Shoreline Master Plan that says, gives an exclusion for
development for $11,200 for all other docks constructed in fresh waters. This is very general. It
seems like an amendment that could be abused in the future if that number gives up. From my
perspective, anything that is built on or over the water should require a special development
permit. So that's the only thing in the Shoreline Management Plan that really caught my eye and
said, wait, this is something we really need to consider very seriously. It looks a little fishy from
my standpoint, frankly, but maybe I don't really understand what the purpose of that is, and
maybe Jacob can be, or these guys can inform me on what the meaning of that is.
If I'm unclear about it, other readers will be unclear about it. So that section needs to be
reconsidered and clarified as to exactly what that $11,200 stands for. But from my interpretation,
it means you can build a structure that goes under that cost, and nobody has to consider it. So, I
don't think that's what you meant. Anyway, if you want the details, you can look to the document.
But anyhow, I must say thank you for the time tonight, and I did enjoy actually doing this kind
of stuff. So, I did have a great deal of fun reading the Shoreline Master Program, and I'll be back.
Heather Bush , De partment of Ecolo gy
Rick White asked if Ms. Bush had anything to add, she commented that she believed a lot of the
questions the Commissioners have can be answered by the 2021 version of the periodic review
checklist guidance.
Chair Cochran closed the public hearing.
WORSHOP
None
OTHER BUSINESS
A. Memo National League of Cities 2022 Mayors Institute
Jacob Gonzalez stated good evening members of the Planning Commission, wanted to give the
Planning Commission notice that the City of Pasco in late 2022 applied for and was selected to
participate in the 2023 Cities of Opportunity Mayors Institute, which is hosted by the National
League of Cities, a pretty well-known organization across the country. The Institute is a yearlong
cohort comprised of cities across the country, including their mayors and staff, selected through a
competitive application.
Focus Areas
► Infrastructure
► Planning
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 5 of6 April 20, 2023
Page 195 of 412
► Built environment
► Zoning.
So we are in the very early stages of working with our own Cohort here at the City of Pasco and
working with staff with the Downtown Pasco Development Authority, and obviously under Mayor
Barajas here at the City of Pasco to come up with some initiatives and projects and programs that
we can look at to reengage and improve quality oflife for members of here in the City of Pasco.
As I mentioned, one of five communities, along with East Point, Georgia, that's a suburb of
Atlanta; Mount Vernon, New York; Gresham, Oregon; and Houston, Texas, which is kind of an
outlier, and I think because of the host city, they got to participate.
So, staff will be working over the next twelve months with these cities and amongst ourselves, and
we would like to just bring the Planning Commission along that journey with us as we hopefully
come up with some great community oriented projects and programs that we can implement and
pilot here in central and particularly downtown Pasco.
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Cochran stated with no other business, I recommend a motion to adjourn.
Commissioner Moffitt made the motion to adjourn the meeting, it was seconded by Commissioner
Hendler. Passed unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 7:15 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Carmen Patrick, Administrative Assistant II
Community & Economic Development Department
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page6 of6 April 20, 2023
Page 196 of 412
' ' ( llY ' ~111 Pasco
MEMORANDUM TO PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
City Hall -525 North Third Avenue -Council Chambers
DATE: THURSDAY, MAY 18, 2023
6:30 PM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Background
Jeffrey B. Adams, Associate Planner
Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review
The Shoreline Management Act (SMA) is the foundation for shoreline management in
Washington State. The SMA requires each town, city, and county to review, and, if necessary,
revise its Shoreline Master Program (SMP) every eight years per Revised Code of Washington
(RCW) 90.58.80. The City received a $28,000 Washington State Department of Ecology grant to
review and update the City's SMP in May of 2023.
The City of Pasco last updated their SMP in 2015 . Now, in coordination with the Washington State
Department of Ecology (Ecology), the City is completing the periodic review process to review
and revise its SMP on or before June 30, 2023. The periodic review addresses recent changes in
SMA requirements, changes for consistency with revised comprehensive plans and regulations,
and any other changes deemed necessary to reflect changed circumstances, new information, or
improved data (see attached: Draft Shoreline Master Program Update ).
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the City Council and Planning Commission with a
draft of necessary changes proposed for inclusion in the SMP. The following text includes a
general overview of the SMA and SMP process, followed by a summary of SMP revisions currently
being proposed. The 2015 SMP and information related to the periodic review process are
available online at: https://www.pasco-wa.gov /858 /Shoreline-Master-Pro gram
About the SMA
The SMA was ratified by state voters in 1972 and is codified in RCW 90.58. Its overarching purpose
is "to prevent harm caused by uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the state's major
shorelines." The SMA applies to all shorelands and "Shorelines of the State" on waterbodies
meeting size and flow requirements as defined by the SMA (RCW 90.58.030). The SMA has the
following three primary purposes:
1. To protect the shoreline environment
2. To accommodate water-dependent and other appropriate uses in shorelands
3. To maintain and enhance public access to shorelines
The SMA requires all counties and most towns and cities in the state that have shorelines to
develop and implement SMPs. SMPs are approved at the local level and by Ecology in an
integrated approval process, consistent with the RCW and the SMP guidelines provided in
Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 127-26.
1
Page 197 of 412
Current SMP Update
Ecology is responsible for overseeing the SMP periodic review process consistent with the SMA
and the applicable WAC administrative guidelines. Ecology must also formally approve the locally
approved SMP amendments. Local jurisdictions are responsible for ensuring the SMP complies
with local requirements and is consistent with local plans and policies, as well as state law.
The City of Pasco planning staff have been working with White Bluffs Consulting to prepare
changes to the 2015 SMP for consideration by the Planning Commission, City Council and Ecology
(See attached: Periodic Review Checklist: 2021 Version ).
Changes include the following:
a. The Washington State Legislature clarified the permit exemption for fish passage
projects. SMP 29.01.770 lists requirements for exemption of fish passage
improvement projects. The City of Pasco updated SMP 29.01.770 with reference
to most current state statutes.
b. The Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM) adjusted the cost
threshold for building freshwater docks. SMP 29.01.770 lists old cost thresholds.
The City of Pasco updated the text in 29.01.770 to include updated cost thresholds
and recommended language.
c. OFM adjusted the cost threshold for substantial development from $7,047 to
$8,504 in July 2022 (WSR 22-11-036). The City of Pasco revised SMP 29.01.770 to
use this more up-to-date value.
d. The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) permit rules clarified that
the definition of "development" does not include dismantling or removing
structures. SMP 29.01.080 (30) defines development. The City of Pasco added to
definition: "Development" does not include dismantling or removing structures if
there is no other associated development or re-development.
e. Ecology adopted rules clarifying exceptions to local review under the SMA. The
SMP does not currently contain a section for exceptions to local review. The City
of Pasco added a new subsection to 29.01.020 to include exceptions to review.
f. Ecology adopted rules clarifying exceptions to local review under the SMA. SMP
29.01.770 has exemptions for remedial projects and EFSEC projects. The City of
Pasco deleted references to remedial projects and EFSEC projects from 29.01.770
because those are now included in the list of exceptions.
g. Ecology clarified the SMA does not apply to lands under exclusive federal
jurisdiction. The SMP does not have any clauses or provisions specific to exclusive
federal jurisdiction. This was included in a new section on exceptions (29.01.020).
h. Ecology clarified "default" provisions for nonconforming uses and development.
SMP 29.01.610 and 29.01.620 have specific provisions for nonconforming uses
and structures, but not lots specifically. The City of Pasco added definitions for
nonconforming development, use, and lot in SMP 29.01.080.
i. Ecology clarified "default" provisions for nonconforming uses and development.
SMP 29.01.080 does not include definitions for nonconforming development, use,
or lot. The City of Pasco added a new section for nonconforming lots (29.01.630).
2
Page 198 of 412
j. The Legislature created a new shoreline permit exemption for retrofitting existing
structure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. SMP 29.01.770 does
not contain any exemptions for ADA retrofits. The City of Pasco added an
exemption for ADA retrofits to SMP 29.01.770.
The proposed changes were made available to public agencies, NPOs, tribes, and the general
public via direct email, City of Pasco web posts, Ecology website posting, and public notice during
a 60-day comment period held between February 24th and April 25 th 2023; comments have been
indexed and addressed by staff and consultant in a Comment Response Matrix, and are attached
to this Planning Commission Staff Report packet (See attached: City of Pasco SMP Periodic Review
Comment List ).
Comments included the following:
1) A Citizen of Pasco complaint regarding a possible SMP code violation, and a request for
the following:
a. Assess the extent of habitat, cultural and historical damage by an independent
expert.
b. Prepare a restoration/remediation plan that addresses the loss of habitat and/or
cultural damage.
c. Implement an educational initiative informing local citizens of the importance of
this type of habitat.
d. Restructure the [City's] shoreline park management personnel to prevent future
such habitat destruction.
e. Document improved management practices in the draft 2023 SMP.
2) A Department of Ecology recommendation to change the minimum buffer width to be
not less than 75% of the required buffer width established under this SMP;
3) A Department of Ecology recommendation to use the updated land use intensity table on
pages D-6 and D-7, from Ecology's 2022 CAO Guidance.
4) A Department of Ecology recommendation to update the references on pg. 128 & 130 to
Ecology's joint agency mitigation guidance document.
5) A Citizen of Pasco recommendation to expand "The SMA was enacted in 1971 ... " to
review the history of the SMP from the original 1974 franklin county SMP, the adoption
by reference in 2003, the revision in 2016, and the current revision.
6) A Citizen of Pasco recommendation to reintroduce 29.01.080 Definitions "Invasive, non-
native vegetation species" to the SMP.
7) A Citizen of Pasco recommendation to amend 29.01.080 Definitions (8S)(a) "Visual
Access" to read "Visual public access may consist of view corridors, viewpoints, or other
means of visual approach to public waters, adjoining habitat and wildlife areas."
8) A Citizen of Pasco recommendation to amend 29.01.300 Agriculture (10) to read "New
agricultural activities shall not remove existing native or non-native vegetation, except for
noxious and invasive vegetation, between all cropland or pasture areas and adjacent
waters or wetlands pursuant to the critical-areas provisions of this SMP."
9) A Citizen of Pasco recommendation to modify 29.01.410 Recreational Development (l)(d)
"Preference shall be given to the development and enhancement of public access to the
shoreline to increase fishing, boating, and other water-related recreational
3
Page 199 of 412
opportunities" to read "Preference shall be given to the development and enhancement
of public access to increase water-enjoyment recreational opportunities."
10) A generic set of Citizen of Pasco complaints/comments, wondering why the SMPs aren't
being followed; citing public access issues regarding new multi development; concerns
regarding Pasco Municipal Code numbering; the new addition exclusion for development
of $11,200 for all other docks constructed in fresh waters; the suggestion that anything
on or above the water should require a permit.
11) A Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) Cultural Resources
Protection Program (CRPP) request to add "cultural resources" Under 4.4 Shoreline Uses
and Modifications Element (12) Recreational Development Polices (b).
12) A CTUIR CRPP request to add "in compliance with State and Federal laws" under 4.6
Historic, Cultural. Scientific, and Educational Resources Element (1) Goals(a).
13) A CTUIR CRPP request to define minor trenching Under 29.01.460 Utilities (13)
14) A CTUIR CRPP request to include that the City of Pasco will: 1) ensure that shoreline
development will provide protection to sites and areas that have historic, cultural, and
archaeological value in compliance with state and federal laws and 2) as part of the
shoreline permit application review process, coordinate with tribal, State, and Federal
agencies that maintain inventories of known significant historic, cultural, and
archaeological sites Under 29.01.220(2) Archaeological and Historic Resources.
The Planning Commission held a Joint Public Hearing with the Washington State Department of
Ecology on April 20th 2023. A presentation was prepared for the Planning Commission and the
public summarizing the proposed changes. Proposed changes are required to comply with
changes in Federal and State laws and regulations enacted since the 2015 update; these are
relatively minor edits to the existing SMP.
Pro posed Motion:
I move the Planning Commission recommend Staff deliver all SMP update documents, as per
attached in the May 18th 2023 Planning Commission Report, to the Washington State
Department of Ecology (Ecology) for initial determination.
4
Page 200 of 412
CITY OF PASCO
DRAFT SHORELINE MASTER
PROGRAM UPDATE
Adapted:
Prepared for
City of Pasco
AppFe';ed:
Effeeth,e:
Prepared by
Ammer QeA, LLCWhite Bluffs Consultin g
gg33 West Grandridge Av0ffi!e , Swite
Al89205 East 36th Avenue
Kennewick, Washington 993316
Prepared wit~ assistaRGe tram
0Hez:a & Asseeiates
3131 Western ,",¾'e , Saite 3 l 0
Seattl~ \l{ashiHgteH_ 98121
This rer>ort was tl-unded through a grant from the Washington State Department of Ecology
Style Definition: TOC 3
r Formatted: Superscript -~---------
Page 201 of 412
bat 2023June 2015 {Revised 0Gl8ber 2015)
City of Pasc;o Shoreline Master Program
White Bluffs Consu/tlng l\neher Q.e'4'0neza & AsseGiates
Jun a 2016Februar y l)esember 202~
Ora~
;;
[ FMmatted: Highlight
Page 202 of 412
Juno 201 li FebruaryDooom~or 20232
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I: Shoreline Goals and Policies (RCW 90.58.100) ...................................................... 1
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1
2 Relationship Between Growth Management Act and Shoreline Management Act .. 1
3 Profile of the Shoreline Jurisdiction within the City of Pasco .................................... 2
3.1 Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers ..................................................................... 2
3.2 Shorelines of Statewide Significance ........................................................ 2
4 Development of Goals and Policies .............................................................................. 2
4.1 Economic Development Element ............................................................. 3
4.2 Public Access and Recreation Element .................................................... 4
4.3 Circulation Element ................................................................................... 6
4.4 Shoreline Uses and Modifications Element .............................................. 7
4.5 Conservation Element ............................................................................. 16
4.6 Historic, Cultural, Scientific; and Educational Resources Element ...... 18
4. 7 Flood Hazard Management Element ...................................................... 19
4.8 Private Property Right ............................................................................ 20
SECTION II: Shoreline Regulations ........................................................................................... 21
Article I. Authority and Purpose .................................................................................... 21
29.01.010 Authority ............................................................................................ 21
29.01.020 Applicability ....................................................................................... 21
29.01 .030 Purpose ............................................................................................... 22
29.01.040 Relationship to Other Codes, Ordinances, and Plans ...................... 23
29.01.050 Liberal Construction .......................................................................... 24
29.01.060 Severability ......................................................................................... 24
29.01.070 Effective Date ..................................................................................... 24
29.01.080 Definitions .......................................................................................... 25
Article II. Environment Designation .............................................................................. 47
29.01.100 Environment Designations ................................................................ 47
29.01.110 Aquatic ............................................................................................... 48
29.01.120 Natural. ............................................................................................... 49
29.01.130 Urban Conservancy ........................................................................... 51
29.01.140 Public Flood Protection ..................................................................... 52
29.01.150 Recreation .......................................................................................... 53
29.01.160 High Intensity-Industrial... ............................................................. 55
29.01.170 High Intensity-Mixed Use .............................................................. 56
29.01.180 Shoreline Residential.. ....................................................................... 58
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
White Bluffs Consu/tingl'.nshor QENOnei!a & /\ssosiales
Page 203 of 412
June 201 liFebrua ry Desember 2023a
Article m. General Regulations ...................................................................................... 60
29.01.200 Shoreline Use and Modification ....................................................... 60
29.01.210 Development Standards ..................................................................... 64
29.01.220 Archaeological and Historic Resources ............................................ 65
29.01.230 Environmental Protection ................................................................. 66
29.01.240 Shoreline Vegetation Conservation .................................................. 67
29.01.250 Water QJiality, Stormwater, and Nonpoint Pollution ..................... 67
29.01.260 Public Access ...................................................................................... 68
29.01.270 Flood Hazard Reduction .................................................................... 73
Article IV. Shoreline Modifications and Use Regulations ............................................. 76
29.01.300 Agriculture ......................................................................................... 76
29.01.320 Boating Facilities ................................................................................ 77
29.01.330 Breakwater, Jetties, Groins, and Weirs ............................................. 80
29.01.340 Commercial Development ................................................................ 81
29.01.350 Dredging and Dredge Material Disposal .......................................... 83
29.01.360 Fill and Excavation ............................................................................ 86
29.01.370 Industrial Development .................................................................... 88
29.01.380 In-stream Structures .......................................................................... 89
29.01.390 Mining ................................................................................................ 91
29.01.400 Piers and Docks .................................................................................. 92
29.01.410 Recreational Development ................................................................ 98
29.01.420 Residential Development ................................................................ 101
29.01.430 Shoreline Habitat and Natural Systems Enhancement Projects ... 102
29.01.440 Shoreline Stabilization ..................................................................... 103
29.01.450 Transportation: Trails, Roads, and Parking .................................... 104
29.01.460 Utilities ............................................................................................. 106
Article V. Critical Areas ................................................................................................ 110
29.01.500 Critical Areas .................................................................................... 110
29.01.510 General Provisions ........................................................................... 112
29.01.520 Wetlands .......................................................................................... 121
29.01.530 Fish and Wildlife Habitat... ....................................................... 13~
29.01.540 Aquifer Recharge Areas ................................................................... 142
29.01.550 FloodHazardAreas ......................................................................... 146
29.01.560 Geologic Hazard Areas .................................................................... 148
Article VI. Existing Uses, Structures, and Lots ............................................................ 157
29.01.600 Applicability ..................................................................................... 157
29.01.610 Nonconforming Uses ....................................................................... 157
29.01.620 Nonconforming Structures .............................................................. 158
29.01.630 Nonconforming Lots ........................................................................ 160
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
White Bluffs Consulting/'.RGROF QEl','Gnoz,a & AGG0Gial0G
Draft
ii
Page 204 of 412
J11Re 2015 Februarygesember 20232
Article VII. Administration and Enforcem.ents ........................................................... 161
29.01.700 Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................... 161
29.01.710 Interpretation ................................................................................... 162
29.01.720 Statutory Noticing Requirements ................................................... 162
29.01. 730 Application Requirements .............................................................. 163
29.01.740 Shoreline Substantial Development Permits .................................. 163
29.01.750 Shoreline Special Use Permits ......................................................... 164
29.01.760 Shoreline Variance Permits ............................................................ 165
29.01.770 Exemptions from Shoreline Substantial Development Permits .... 166
29 .01. 780 Duration of Permits ......................................................................... 1 72
29.01.790 Initiation of Development ............................................................... 173
29.01.800 Review Process ................................................................................ 173
29.01.810 Appeals ............................................................................................. 174
29.01.820 Amendments to Permits .................................................................. 174
29.01.830 Enforcement ..................................................................................... 175
29.01.840 Cumulative Effects of Shoreline Developments ............................ 175
29.01.850 Amendments to Shoreline Master Program ................................... 176
29.01.860 Shoreline Environment Designation Maps or Official Shoreline Map
176
,SECTIO~I I: Shefeline Geals anti Pelicies (RCW 90.58. JOO~ ....................................................... I
,1-lntrM!Uflion .............................................................................................................. '__.
J, RelatioRship Between Growth Management Aet 011d Shoreline Management Aet I
p Profile of the Shoreline Jurisdietion within the City of Paseo ......................... , ........ 2
J,.1 Shef0line Jt1fisdietien Rivers ·:····· ....................................... 0 ....................... 2
J, .2 Shefelines ef Statewitle Significance .......................................................... 2
,4 DeYelopment of Coals and Polieies .............................................................................. 2
,4. I I'lcenemie De•,•elepment Element ..................................... , .... ,_ .................... 3
,4 .2 ___ Pl!blie Access and Recrnatien ElemenL ........................ '. ........ , ................... 4
,4 .3~ .. C:ifelllatien Element ................ __ ._._ ..................... _ ... _ ... _• .......................... e
,4.4 _ Shef01ine Uses anti Medifications element ................................................ 7
,4 .5 Censervatien element ............................................................................... le
.4 .e Histeric, Clllturnl, Scientifie, and educational Resellrces element... ....... 18
,4.7 Fleed Hazard Management Element ........................................................ 19
,4.8 ___ Pri;•ate Property Right.. .......... _ ................................................................. 20
,SeCTIO~I II: Shoreline Reglllations ............................................................................................ 21
1<\rtiele I. Authority and Pur11ose. _ .............. _ ............................................................... 21
_29.0LOI O Alltherity ........................................................................................... 21
_29.01 .020 Applieability ....................................................................................... 21
fU;l-1-1~ ~ )~!Ff-..... . ..••...............•.. ·""·.......... . . • • • • • • • . • • • • . . . . . . . • . . . . • . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :
_29.01.040 Relationship to Other Cedes, Ordinaaces, anti Plans ......................... 22
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
White Bluffs ConsultinqAnc/:ior Qlel\lOnoai & Associalos
Draft
iii
I Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
I Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
I Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
-------
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
I Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
I Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
l Formatted: ~ragraph Font
[ ;;;,;;atted: Default Paragraph ;,;-
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: ~graph Font
Formatted:~aragraph Font
Formatted: Defau_lt_P_ara_g::ara..:ap~h~F~on~t ______ _
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Page 205 of 412
JuRe 2016 February Qesem!Cler 2023:l
)9.01 .050 L1eeFal C0estraet10R ............................................ . . ................... 23
i.~i :i-i::::ate :--=--=--::::::::::::::::::: :-::::: :::::: ::: :::: ::: ::::: : ::: .. ~!
prtiele II. Eevireemeet Desi.geetiee ................................................................ , ..... ~ ...... _46
J'U)!.100 Ee¥iFeem.eeJDesigeatiee_s .................................................................. 4~
;1il-<+!.,..J.j.µ_\tllhlli.:. .... .. . -.. ... . . . . . .. . .. .. . ... .• • • ··•· . I
~,~4~4 0--1>,.½fttftt! ............................................................................................... .
j9.0I .130 brnae C'eeser.,aeey ............................................................ ·········· 50
,29.01 .140 . Pl:i0lie fleod Prnteetioe ···············.··········:·······:·:·········.'.···:·······.···c·····:··· 51
,t}-i. . µ__j?«ft',tl·WH .......................................................................................... ~2
J9J!.!. !Q.g__Hig~eesity IRau&tnal ······························································::-.-54
)9.01 .170. :High IRteesity Milted U,o ................................................................ 55
)9.01, 180 ShoFelieo ROGideRtial ............................................................................ 57
;<\rtiele .111 .. Geeentl Reguletiees .................................................................................... S9
)9.01 .200 Sherelieo Use ae~ ~4Q.<!iii§atjoe ..'..'.'..'." .................................................... 59
)2.01 .210 .. De~opmeet St!lfldaFds ...................................................................... 63
)9.01 .220 AFehaeologieal aed HistoFie ResoHFees ............ , .......................... , ...... €i4
)9.01 .230 EeviFoemoetal Prntoetioe ................................................................... 65
)9.01 .21 g__ Sh_or@liee Veg~ioe G..ci.eser.'<l!_iQe .,,········::.::.:.:.:··::.::.·.:···········::····.········· 60
.z.9:0 1:250 Wat_~! ~l!!l.!ity, Stormwater, and !'foflQoiet PollutioR ......................... :~
,29.01.200 Pl:i0he aeeess .......................... :····················································:······
)9.01 .270. Flood Haz:aFd ReduetioR ..................................................................... 72
prtiele IV. Shereliee MeElifieetiees oeEI Use Reguletiees ........................................... 74
)9.01 .300 AgFie1ilture ..................................... _••· ........................................ 74
)9.01 .320 BoatiRg Faeilities ................................................... _ ...... _ .................. 75
)9.01 .330 Breakv,,ater. Jetties, Greies. aed Weirs ............................................... 78
)9.01.340 Commereial De,'eloflmeet .................................................................. 79
)9.01 .350 Dreagieg !lfla Droege MateFial Disposal ............................................ 81
,29.01 .360 Fi!l i!.~_lrnavatioe ---~ ____ ........ _ ............................................. 84
)9.01 .370 Jeau,trial DeyeJopmeet ...................................................................... 80 i~:~: :!~~ -tfe~•:::::HFeS ·····~·····:~······=~···· .... ~:······································ ~~
)9.01.410 Reereatioeal De·,eloflmeet .................................................................. 96
)9.01 .420 Resideetial DeYelapmeet ................................................... :················ 98
)9.01.430 Sh0reliee Haeitat aea >,atural S) stem, ERhaReemeet Pr0Jeet, ......... 99
)9.01.4 4 0 Shoreliee ~AaailizatioR ...................................................................... I 00
;!9.01 .450 Tr_!lll!,fl.0~_1011: Traib. Rm1d~. aed Pacrhl!!g =:.:.:::.::=····..'..'.:::.:·:::::·::::····~
.2,2:,01 ,400 .lJtilitie•, ·.:.::::.:.::· .. ················································································· 104
prtiele V. Critieol Areas .............. _ ... .--....... _ ...... ~ .. _... . ........................................ 1118
-j9.0l.500 Critieill J\rea~ .................................................................................... 108 ~~:§!:;~§. ft~~~~J:~¥iS~RS ...................... ::···········=··································:····· ! !Z
)9.01 .530 Fish aa~ 'Nildlife Haeitat... ............................................................... 131
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
White Bluffs Consultinq ARohor QEIVORezca & Aeoooiateo
Draft
iv
[ Formatted [j
I Formatted Cj
I Formatted CJ
I Formatted CJ
I Formatted CJ
I Formatted cj
[_Formatted d
[ Formatted
-
_[j
I Formatted _c;j
I Formatted CJ
I Formatted CJ
I Formatted 0
[ Formatted CJ
[ Formatted
I-Formatted .d
I Formatted ,CJ
I Formatted CJ
I Formatted CJ
I Formatted CJ. I Formatted CJ
[ Formatted c;j
I Formatted [j
I Formatted _CJ
I Formatted CJ
Formatted c;j
Formatted CJ
Formatted .Q
Formatted cj
Formatted c:1
Formatted CJ
Formatted CJ
Formatted c;j
Formatted CJ
Formatted d
Formatted d
Formatted 0
Formatted CJ
Formatted
Formatted CJ
Formatted ___CJ
Formatted cj
Formatted __CJ
Formatted GJ
Formatted CJ
Formatted CJ
Page 206 of 412
J1me 201 &Februa ry Cecember 20232
,29.01.540 AtiHiter ReCflarge Areas ................................................................... 140
,29.0l .550 Pleed Ha~ard Areas .......................................................................... 14 4
,29.0l .560 _ Geelegie Ha~ard Areas ..................................................................... 146
/.Ftielc VJ. E:1tistiag Uses, StFHetHFes, 1md Lets .......................................................... 1§§
,29.01 .600 _ Applieaeilit)' ..................................................................................... 155
,29.01.610 ~!eaeeRfofHliRg Uses ........................................................................ 155
,29.01.620. ~!0ae0Rfom1iRg Straetures ................................................................ 156
29.01.630 ~leReeRfofHliRg Lets
............................................ _ ............ 'IPP
/.Ftiele VII. Administrntiea and EnfaFCements ......................................................... 1§9
,29.01.700 Rel es and RespeRsihilities ................................................................ 159
,29.01.710 IRterpretatieR ..................................................................................... 160
,29.01 .720. £taMef)' NetieiRg ReEil¼iremeRts ..................................................... I aQ
,29.01.730 ApplieatieR ReEil¼iremeRt~ ................................................................ I al
,29.01 .740 ShereliRe £wstaRtial De•,'elopmeRt Pennits .................................... 161
,29.01 .750 Shoreline £peeial Use Pennits .. ,,c.:·:c:·: .. ,:., .......... , ...... , ...... , ............... 16,?
,29.01.760 £horeliRe VariaRee Pennits ................. " ........................................... 163
,29.01.770 eirnmptions froR1 £hereliRe SwstaRtial De•,'elepmeRt PefHlits ........ 164
,29.01 .780 DHratieR of Pennits ........................................................................... 170
,29.01 .790 lnitiatieR ofDe\•elepment.. ............................................................... 170
,29.0I .800 Re\'iew Preeess ................................................................................. 171
,29.01.810 Appeals ............................................................................................. 171
,29.01.820 Amendments te Pem1its .................................................................... 172
,29.01.830 _Enferee!l'leRt .. _ ............... _ ...... _ .. _ ...... _ ............... _ ............... 172
,29.01.840 _ C1,1m1,1lati\'e Effeets ef £hereliRe De~'elepmeRts ............................... 173
,29.01.850 AmeRdmeRts t_e £hereline Master PF<Jgram ... .._ ................................. 173
,29.01 .860 £lrnreline EnviroRment DesigRatiea Maps er Offieial £hereliRe Map ..
----1-73-
List of Tables
Table 1. Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers .......................................................................................... 2
Table 29.01.200 (2): Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix for City of Pasco ............... 616-l-aO
Table 29.01.210 (2): Shoreline Development Standards Matrix for City of Pasco ........... 65~
Table 29.01.520 (S)(a): Wetland Buffer Width Requirements .................................... 123~
Table 29.01.520 (S)(b): Land Use Intensity Table ........................................................ 125~
Table 29.01.520 (13): Wetland Mitigation Ratios (for Eastern Washington) ............. 133-83--8-1-
Table 29.01.530 (3): Classification by Fish and Wildlife Areas ................................... 135~
Table 29.01.540 (2)(a): Designation of Aquifer Recharge Areas ................................. 143-l-4.H-4+
Table 29.01.560 (3)(a): Criteria for Classification of Geologic Hazard Areas ............. 149-1-49+4-7
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
White Bluffs ConsultinqAnshor QENOno:zca & Assosiatos
Draft
V
I Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: ~aragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default P~graph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph F~
Formatted: Nonna!, Indent: Left: 0.94"
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: De~ragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: ,£,e~raph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Pal"<l_graph Font
Formatted: Default Paragrap_h Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font_
Formatted: ~ragraph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Formatted: Default P~ph Font
Formatted: Default Paragraph Font
Page 207 of 412
June 2015 February DeGember 20232
Table 29.01.560 (4): Rating of Geologic Hazard Risk .................................................. 15~
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
White Bluffs ConsultinqAns"1er QElVOnera & Asses.'ales
Draft
vi
Page 208 of 412
JuRe 201 liFebrua rvDeGember 20232
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ADA
BMP
CFR
City
County
CPTED
CWA
Ecology
FEMA
FIRM
GMA
Guidelines
HPA
JARPA
NOAA
NRCS
OHWM
PMC
RCW
SEPA
SHB
SMA
SMP
SR
ssws
UGA
USACE
USEPA
Americans with Disabilities Act
best management practice
Code of Federal Regulations
City of Pasco
Franklin County
Crime Prevention through Environmental Design
Clean Water Act
Washington State Department of Ecology
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Flood Insurance Rate Map
Growth Management Act
SMA Guidelines (Chapter 173-26 WAC)
hydraulic project approval
Joint Aquatic Resource Permits Application
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation
Service
ordinary high water mark
Pasco Municipal Code
Revised Code of Washington
State Environmental Policy Act
Shorelines Hearings Board
Washington State Shoreline Management Act
Shoreline Master Program
subreach
shorelines of statewide significance
urban growth area
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Am;/wr Qlil'/Oneca & Assesiales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
vii
Page 209 of 412
June 2016 FebruaryDesemller 20232
USFWS
USGS
WADOH
WAC
WDFW
WDNR
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S. Geological Survey
Washington State Department of Health
Washington Administrative Code
Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife
Washington State Department of Natural Resources
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anol=lor QEIVOno.ra & /1.ssooiatosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
viii
Page 210 of 412
June 201 SFebruaryCesemller 20232
SECTION I: Shoreline Goals and Policies (RCW 90.58.100)
1 Introduction
The City of Pasco, through an updated Shoreline Master Program (SMP), intends to implement
the requirements of the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA) Revised Code of
Washington (RCW 90.58), the state SMA Guidelines (Chapter 173-26 Washington
Administrative Code [WAC]) (Guidelines), and the Shoreline Management Permit and
Enforcement Procedures (WAC 173-27).
The SMA was enacted in 1971 to provide for the management and protection of shorelines of the
state by regulating development in the shoreline area. The goal of the SMA is, "to prevent the
inherent harm in an uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the state's shorelines" (RCW
90.58.020). The SMA requires cities and counties to adopt an SMP to regulate shoreline
development and accommodate "all reasonable and appropriate uses" consistent with "protection
against adverse effects to the public health, the land and its vegetation and wildlife, and the
waters of the state and their aquatic life ... and public rights of navigation." The City of Pasco did
not have its own SMP prior to -the 2015 com prehensive u pdatcthis 1-!fltlate. The City had adopted
by reference and implemented Franklin County's SMP, which had been approved in 1974. The
SMP has again been updated in 2022 and 2023 as part of a periodic review and u pd ate.
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) approved the updated SMA Guidelines in
2003. The SMA and implementing SMP Guidelines require all towns, cities, and counties across
the state to comprehensively update their SMPs. The guidelines provide new requirements for
environmental protections, including meeting no net loss of ecological functions, providing
public access, accounting for advancements in science and shoreline management practices, and
establishing a clear relationship between the SMA and the Growth Management Act (GMA).
The u nd ated version ofthe4& SMP for the City of Pasco provides goals, policies, and regulations
for the development of Pasco shorelines consistent with the SMA and guidelines.
2 Relationship Between Growth Management Act and Shoreline
Management Act
Afl: SMP contains goals, policies, regulations, and environment designation maps that guide
shoreline development in accordance with state requirements. Pasco's SMP is integrated with the
City's land use regulation system. Consistent with RCW 36. 70A.480, the goals and policies
contained in this SMP shall be considered an element of the City's Comprehensive Growth
Management Plan (Comprehensive Plan) required by the GMA. All other portions of this SMP,
including the use regulations, are considered a part of the City's development regulations
required by the GMA.
The Inventory, Analysis, and Characterization Report; Restoration Plan; Cumulative hnpacts
Analysis Report (which includes the "no net loss of shoreline ecological functions" analysis
findings); and Public Participation Plan are supporting documents and are not adopted as part of
this SMP or the City's Comprehensive Plan.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QEA/One;!B & /1.ssec.bles White Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
1
Page 211 of 412
JuRe 2111 liFebruary Deoemller 2023.!-
The Inventory, Analysis, and Characterization Report establishes the baseline against which the
standard "no net loss of shoreline ecological functions" is measured. The Restoration Plan
identifies and prioritizes shoreline restoration opportunities that may be undertaken
independently or in conjunction with mitigation for development impacts to improve shoreline
ecological functions over time.
3 Protile of the Shoreline Jurisdiction within the City of Pasco
The Washington State SMA defines the Shoreline of the State as, "all 'shorelines' and
'shorelines of statewide (SSWS)' within the state" (RCW 90.58.030). The shoreline includes
floodways, land within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the waterways,
floodplains up to 200 feet from the floodway edge, and associated wetlands.
3.1 Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers
Pasco's SMP encompasses shoreline along the Columbia River and Snake River. The City's
shoreline waterbodies are listed in Table 1. Both the Columbia River and Snake River are
considered SSWS. See Section 3.2 for discussion on SSWS.
Table 1. Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers
Shoreline of Statewide Total Length
Stream Name Significance Proposed Shoreline
Columbia River Yes 14.4 miles
Snake River Yes 2.8 miles
3.2 Shorelines of Statewide Significance
The entire shoreline jurisdiction in the City that includes the Columbia and Snake rivers are
considered SSWS, as listed in Table 1. The SMA designates certain shoreline areas as SSWS,
which are defined as "natural rivers or segments thereof' that have a mean annual flow of
200 cubic feet per second or more ( or for streams east of the crest of the Cascades [RCW
90.58.030], the portion downstream from the first 300 square miles of drainage area) and lakes,
whether natural, artificial, or a combination thereof, of 1,000 acres or greater in surface area. The
Columbia and Snake rivers are SSWS based on the flow and upstream drainage criteria.
The SSWS protection and management goals are described in the Development of Goals and
Policies -Shoreline Uses and Modifications Element section.
4 Development of Goals and Policies
Goals express broad value statements that reflect the City's vision of its shorelines. Goals also
provide a framework upon which the more detailed SMP shoreline use environments, policies,
regulations, and administrative procedures are based in subsequent chapters. Policies are more
detailed statements reflecting the City's goals and visions for its shorelines. Policies provide
detail to the associated goals and act as a bridge between the goals and implementing regulations.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARG!.ar QEl'JOReZca & AsseGiatesWhite Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
2
Page 212 of 412
June 201S February December 20232
The SMP goals and policies are categorized according to the SMP elements mandated in the
SMA. The general goal and policy statements found within each SMP element provide the policy
basis for the City's SMP administration.
4.1 Economic Development Element
(I) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Support water-oriented uses to maximize the positive economic
impact of tourism and recreational development.
(b) Goal B: Promote economic growth that conserves natural resources and
open spaces and maintains the environmental quality.
( c) Goal C: Maintain existing development and secure additional commercial
and industrial facilities and infrastructure necessary for existing and future
development in shoreline areas where it is most feasible, while
maintaining environmental quality.
( d) Goal D: Recognize the role of the rivers as a transportation corridor that
facilitates trade and economic growth. Protect and expand the assets
necessary in the rivers and on the shoreline to utilize that transportation
corridor to promote economic development.
(2) Policies:
(a) Ensure healthy, orderly economic growth by providing for those economic
activities that will be an asset to the local economy and for which the
adverse effects on the quality of the shoreline and surrounding
environment can be mitigated. Ensure any economic activity taking place
along the shoreline operates without causing irreparable harm to the site's
environment or adjacent shoreline areas.
(b) Maintain and protect existing water-dependent and water-related
industries that support the City's economy. Provide opportunities for
future expansions of such industries.
(c) Allow diversion of water for agricultural, commercial, and industrial
purposes consistent with the State's water rights laws.
( d) Dredging of the rivers and shoreline transportation assets is a necessary
component of maintaining the capabilities of the rivers to serve as a
transportation corridor for inputs and outputs of industries within Pasco
and surrounding areas.
( e) Promote tourism and develop and maintain, as an economic asset, the
recreation and tourism industry along shorelines in a manner that will
enhance public enjoyment.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ancher QEl'JOne;!:3 & AssecialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
3
Page 213 of 412
June 2016 FebruaryDesember 20232
(f) Work with the Port of Pasco, Franklin County, and other agencies to
ensure sustainable economic growth along the shoreline. Encourage
cooperative use of existing port facilities, including docks and piers, where
feasible and when they do not negatively affect the public safety.
(g) Give preference to economic activities in undeveloped areas, which either
leave natural or existing shoreline features such as trees, shrubs, grasses,
and wildlife habitat, unmodified, or modify them in a way that enhances
human awareness and appreciation of the shoreline and other natural and
non-natural surroundings.
(h) Encourage new water-dependent, water-related, and water-enjoyment
economic development in priority order.
(i) Where possible, encourage development that incorporates low-impact
development techniques into new projects and integrates architectural and
landscape elements that recognize the river environment.
(j) Require non-water-oriented commercial or recreational development to
provide for ecological restoration and public access as appropriate.
(k) Ensure new industrial and commercial uses will not result in a net loss of
shoreline ecological functions or have significant adverse impacts on
navigation, recreation, and public access.
4.2 Public Access and Recreation Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Promote, protect, and enhance physical and visual public access
along the shoreline of the Columbia and Snake rivers. Increase the amount
and diversity of public access along the shoreline consistent with private
property rights, public safety, and the natural shoreline character.
(b) Goal B: Maintain and enhance the existing public access system according
to the City's Public Access Plan (Rivershore Linkage and Amenity Plan
approved by the City in 2012), building upon the City's many types of
shoreline public access with new public access opportunities where
appropriate.
(c) Goal C: Provide physical and visual public access as feasible and when
new development creates demand for public access.
(d) Goal D: Ensure diverse, convenient, and adequate water-oriented
recreational opportunities along the shoreline for the public.
(e) Goal F: Give water-oriented shoreline recreational development priority
within shoreline jurisdiction.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARchor Q&JORoZca & AssocialosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
4
Page 214 of 412
June 2016 Februa ry Cesemlaer 20232
(2) Policies:
(a) Protect and enhance visual and physical access to shoreline, especially on
public properties. Provide visual access, such as viewpoints or view
corridors, in areas with limited physical access due to a steep slope or the
sensitive nature of the shoreline whenever possible.
(b) Ensure new developments, uses, and activities on or near the shoreline do
not impair or detract from the public's access to the water. Where
practicable, public access to the shoreline should be enhanced.
(c) Design public access that minimizes potential impacts to private property
and individual privacy.
(d) Locate, design, manage, and maintain public access and recreation
facilities in a manner that protects shoreline ecological functions and
processes and the public's health and safety.
(e) Identify opportunities for public access on publicly owned shorelines and
according to the City's Public Access Plan. Encourage federal, state, and
local governments to provide public access and recreational uses on
existing shoreline properties according to their management policies such
as existing state parks, trails and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
lands along the Columbia River.
(f) Preserve, maintain, and enhance public access afforded by shoreline street
ends, public utilities, and rights-of-way.
(g) Provide physical and visual public access in the shoreline jurisdiction in
association with the following uses when feasible: residential
developments with five or more dwellings; commercial development; and
public agency recreational development.
(h) Provide public access and interpretive displays as part of publicly funded
restoration projects where significant ecological impacts are addressed.
(i) Allow for passive and active shoreline recreation that emphasizes location
along shorelines in association with the state, county and other public
agency parks, recreation, wildlife habitat, and open-space plans.
(j) Encourage a variety of compatible recreational experiences and activities
to satisfy the City's diverse recreational needs such as parks, boat lunches,
docks, trail§, and viewing platforms.
(k) Give water-dependent recreation priority water-enjoyment recreation uses.
Give water-enjoyment recreational uses priority over non-water-oriented
recreational uses.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ansher QE,6/0neil'a & Assesiales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
5
Page 215 of 412
June 2015 February Desemller 20232
(1) Integrate and link water-oriented recreational facilities with other
amenities along the shoreline, such as walking trails, bicycle paths,
easements, and scenic drives when feasible. For example, encourage
connection between the Sacajawea Heritage Trail and the Columbia
Plateau Trail in Franklin County.
(m) Promote non-intensive recreational uses that avoid adverse effects to the
natural environment, do not contribute to flood hazards, and avoid damage
to the shoreline environment through modifications such as structural
shoreline stabilization or native vegetation removal.
4.3 Circulation Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Develop safe, convenient, and diversified circulation systems to
ensure efficient movement of people, goods, and services, with minimal
adverse impacts on the shoreline environment.
(2) Policies:
(a) Provide safe, reasonable, and adequate circulation systems to shorelines
where routes will minimize adverse effects on unique or fragile shoreline
features and existing ecological systems, while contributing to the
functional and visual enhancement of the shoreline.
(b) Within the shoreline jurisdiction, locate land circulation systems that are
not shoreline-oriented and as far from the land-water interface as
practicable to reduce interference with either natural shoreline resources or
other appropriate shoreline uses.
( c) Allow for maintenance and improvements to existing roads and parking
areas. Allow for necessary new roads and parking areas when other
locations outside of shoreline jurisdiction are not feasible.
( d) Plan and develop a circulation network, which is compatible with the
shoreline environment and respects and protects ecological and aesthetic
values in the shoreline of the state, as well as private property rights.
(e) In the circulation network, plan for pedestrian, bicycle, and public
transportation where appropriate. Circulation planning and projects should
support existing and proposed shoreline uses that are consistent with the
SMP.
(f) Promote existing transportation corridors for reuse for water-dependent
uses or public access when they are abandoned.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.RGl:ler Q/i;;DJORe.,a & Asses.iales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
6
Page 216 of 412
June 2015 FebruaryDeGember 20232
(g) Encourage relocation or improvement of those circulation elements that
are functionally or aesthetically disruptive to the shoreline, public
waterfront access, and ecological functions.
(h) Plan parking areas to achieve optimum use. Where possible, parking
should serve more than one use (e.g., serving recreational use on
weekends and commercial use on weekdays).
(i) Encourage low-impact parking facilities such as those with gravels or
permeable pavements and bio-swales.
(j) Encourage trail§. and bicycle paths along shorelines in a manner
compatible with the natural character, resources, and ecology of the
shoreline.
(k) Encourage the linkage of shoreline parks, recreation areas, and public
access points with linear systems, such as hiking and bicycle paths,
easements, and scenic drives.
4.4 Shoreline Uses and Modifications Element
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Encourage shoreline development and uses that recognize the
City's natural and cultural values and its unique aesthetic qualities offered
by its variety of shoreline environments, including, but not limited to,
reservoir-bounded river segments, flood protection levees, recreational
and industrial developments, riverine wetlands, open views, and plentiful
formal and informal public access.
(b) Goal B: The City recognizes and protects the functions and values of the
shoreline environments of statewide and local significance. For SSWS,
protection and management priorities are to:
(i) Recognize and protect statewide interest over local interest;
(ii) Preserve the natural character of the shoreline;
(iii) Provide long-term over short-term benefits;
(iv) Protect the resources and ecology of shoreline;
( v) Increase public access to publicly owned areas of shoreline; ftlffi
(vi) Increase recreational opportunities for the public in shoreline areas;
and,
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARsher QEIVORe;za & Assesiates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
7
I Formatted: Indent: Lett: 1.5"
Page 217 of 412
,h1Re 201 liFebruary Desember 20232-
(vii) Recognize the statewide interest in keeping the Columbia and
Snake rivers adequately dredged and maintained to facilitate trade.
(2) General Policies:
(a) Maintain areas within the shoreline jurisdiction with unique attributes for
specific long-term uses, including commercial, industrial, residential,
recreational, and open-space uses.
(b) Ensure proposed shoreline uses are distributed, located, and developed in a
manner that will maintain or improve the health, safety, and welfare of the
public when such uses occupy shoreline areas.
(c) Ensure activities and facilities are located on the shoreline in such a
manner as to retain or improve the quality of the environment.
( d) Ensure proposed shoreline uses do not infringe upon the rights of others,
upon the rights of private ownership, upon the rights of the public under
the Public Trust Doctrine offederal navigational servitude, and treaty
rights of Native American tribes.
( e) Minimize the adverse impacts of shoreline uses and activities on the
environment during all phases of development (e.g., design, construction,
management, and use).
(3) Shoreline Environment Designation Policies:
(a) Provide a comprehensive shoreline environment designation system to
categorize the City's shoreline into environments based on the primary
characteristics of shoreline areas to guide the use and management of
these areas and to preserve wildlife habitat area, natural resources, and
public agency operations.
(b) Designate properties as Natural in order to protect and restore those
shoreline areas that are relatively free of human influence or that include
intact or minimally degraded shoreline functions that are sensitive to
potential impacts from human use.
(c) Designate properties Urban Conservancy to protect and restore ecological
functions of open space, floodplain, and other sensitive lands, while
accommodating low-intensity uses.
(d) Assign appropriate designations to accommodate recreational uses. Ensure
intense recreational uses, such as boat launches and parks, do not conflict
with the sensitive nature of the shoreline (e.g., habitat management units)
where low impact recreational uses are more appropriate.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
/\Ro/:lor QIYVOReca & Assoo.ia!osWhite Bluffs Consultin.,
Draft
8
Page 218 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry tlecember 20232
(e) Assign appropriate designation for flood protection areas maintained by
public agencies, while allowing low-intensity recreational uses such as
trail and viewpoints.
(f) Assign properties as High Intensity-Industrial to support industrial,
commercial , irrigation supply, transportation, and navigation activities
while maintaining the ecological functions.
(g) Assign properties as High Intensity-Mixed Use to support commercial,
residential, transportation , and navigation activities while maintaining the
ecological functions.
(h) Designate properties as Shoreline Residential to accommodate higher
density residential development and recognize existing and proposed land
uses. This designation is appropriate for residential uses on lands with
zoning classifications for detached and attached residences.
( 4) Agriculture Policies:
(a) This SMP recognizes the importance of agriculture to the City's economy
and also as it exists in the City limits and urban growth areas (UGAs).
Allow for ongoing agricultural activities, while also maintaining shoreline
ecological functions and processes .
(b) Conduct new agricultural development in a manner that ensures no net
loss of shoreline ecological functions and processes.
( c) Maintain a vegetative buffer between agricultural lands and waterbodies
or wetlands.
( d) Conversion of agricultural lands to other uses should comply with all
policies and regulations for non-agricultural uses .
(5) Boating Facilities Policies:
(a) Locate and design boating facilities so their structures and operations will
be compatible with the area affected such as environmental conditions,
shoreline configuration, access, and neighboring upland and aquatic uses .
(b) Require restoration activities when substantial improvements or repair~ to
existing boating facilities areis planned.
( c) Boating facilities that minimize the amount of shoreline modification are
preferred.
(d) Boating facilities should provide physical and visual public shoreline
access and provide for multiple uses, including water-related use, to the
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGRer QEAlOReza & AaaecialeaWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
9
Page 219 of 412
June 2015 Februar DeGemller 20232
extent compatible with shoreline ecological functions and processes and
adjacent shoreline use.
( e) Boating facilities should be located and designed to avoid adverse effects
on riverine and nearshore processes, such as erosion, littoral or riparian
transport, aHtl accretion, and~ where feasible, enhance degraded,
scarce, and/or valuable shore features including accretion shoreforms.
(f) Location and design of boating facilities should not unduly obstruct
navigable waters and should avoid adverse effects to recreational
opportunities such as fishing, pleasure boating, swimming, beach walking,
picnicking, and shoreline viewing.
(6) Breakwaters, Jetties, Groins, and Weirs Policies:
(a) To the extent feasible, limit the use of breakwaters, jetties, groins, weirs,
or other similar structures to those projects providing ecological
restoration or other public benefits. These structures should avoid or
minimize significant ecological impacts. Impacts that cannot be avoided
should be mitigated.
(7) Dredging and Dredge Material Disposal Policies:
(a) Dredging and dredge material disposal should avoid and minimize
significant ecological impacts. Impacts that cannot be avoided should be
mitigated.
(b) Design and locate new shoreline development to minimize the need for
dredging.
( c) Limit dredging and dredge material disposal to the minimum necessary to
allow for shoreline restoration, flood hazard reduction, and maintenance of
existing legal moorage and navigation, and to support existing industrial
areas. Except for industrial development, dredging to provide for new
navigation uses is discouraged.
(d) Dredging to support industrial development and to maintain existing
transportation corridors is a necessary and critical component of shoreline
management.
( e) Ensure dredging operations are planned and conducted in a manner that
will minimize interference with navigation and Jessen adverse impacts to
other shoreline uses.
(8) Fill Policies:
(a) Limit fill waterward of the OHWM to support ecological restoration or to
facilitate water-dependent or public access uses.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anclm· QEl'/Onsza & AccocialocWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
10
Page 220 of 412
June ~01 liFebrua ry December 2023~
(b) Allow fill consistent with floodplain regulations upland of the OHWM,
provided it is located, designed, and constructed to protect shoreline
ecological functions and ecosystem-wide processes, including channel
migration, and is the minimum necessary to implement an approved
project.
(9) In-stream Structures Policies:
(a) Locate, plan, and permit in-stream structures only when consistent with
the full range of public interests, ecological functions and processes, and
environmental concerns, with special emphasis on protecting and restoring
priority habitats and species.
(I 0) Mining Policies:
(a) Locate mining facilities outside shoreline jurisdiction whenever feasible.
(b) Do not allow mining in any location waterward of the OHWM.
(c) Design and locate mining facilities and associated activities to prevent loss
of ecological function. Give preference to mining uses that result in the
creation, restoration, or enhancement of habitat for priority species.
(d) Protect waterbodies from sources of pollution, including, but not limited
to, sedimentation and siltation, chemical and petrochemical use, and
spillage and storage/disposal of mining wastes and spoils.
( e) Mining operations should be located, designed, and managed so that other
appropriate uses are not subjected to substantial or unnecessary adverse
impacts from noise, dust, or other effects of the operation . The operator
may be required to implement measures, such as buffers, limited hours, or
other mitigating measures, for the purpose of minimizing adverse
proximity impacts.
(11) Pier and Dock Policies:
(a) Pier and dock provisions should be consistent with the USACE McNary
Pool Management Plan.
(b) Moorage associated with a single-family residence is considered a
water-dependent use provided that it is designed and used as a facility to
access watercraft, and other moorage facilities are not available or
feasible. Moorage for water-related and water-enjoyment uses or shared
moorage for multi-family use should be allowed as part of a mixed-use
development or where it provides public access .
(c) New moorage, excluding docks accessory to single-family residences,
should be permitted when the applicant/proponent has demonstrated that a
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AnehM QE~NOna;z;a & AssaeialasWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
11
Page 221 of 412
JURO 2015 Februa!:}'.DOGember 202~
specific need exists to support the intended water-dependent or public
access use.
(d) As an alternative to continued proliferation of individual private moorage,
mooring buoys are preferred over docks or floats. Shared moorage
facilities are preferred over single-user moorage where feasible, especially
where water-use conflicts exist or are predictable. New subdivisions of
more than two lots and new multi-family development of more than two
dwelling units should provide shared moorage where feasible.
( e) Docks, piers, and mooring buoys, including those accessory to
single-family residences, should avoid locations where they will adversely
impact shoreline ecological functions or processes, including high-velocity
currents and littoral drift.
(f) Moorage should be spaced and oriented in a manner that minimizes
hazards and obstructions to public navigation rights and corollary rights
thereto, such as, but not limited to, fishing, swimming, and pleasure
boating, and private riparian rights of adjacent land-owners.
(g) Moorage should be restricted to the minimum size necessary to meet the
needs of the proposed use. The length, width, and height of piers and
docks should be no greater than that required for safety and practicality for
the primary use.
(h) Pile supports are preferred over fills because piles do not displace water
surface or aquatic habitat and are removable and thus are more flexible in
terms oflong-term use patterns. Floats may be less desirable than pile
structures where aquatic habitat or littoral drift are significant.
(i) The use of buoys for small craft moorage is preferred over pile or float
structures because of less long-term impact on shore features and users;
moorage buoys should be placed as close to shore as possible to minimize
obstruction to navigation.
(j) Piers and docks should be constructed of materials that will not adversely
affect water quality or aquatic plants and animals in the long term.
(k) New pier and dock development should be designed so as not to interfere
with lawful public access to or use of shorelines. Developers of new piers
and shared moorage should be encouraged to provide physical or visual
public access to shorelines whenever safe and compatible with the primary
use and shore features.
(12) Recreational Development Policies:
(a) Shoreline recreational development should be given priority for shoreline
location to the extent that the use facilitates the public's ability to reach,
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.Ro/:ior Qe8,'0RO>ffi & Assooialos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
12
Page 222 of 412
J11ne 201 liFebruaryCesember 2023Z
touch, and enjoy the water's edge, to travel on the waters of the state, and
to view the water and the shoreline. Where appropriate, such facilities
should be dispersed along the shoreline in a manner that supports more
frequent recreational access and aesthetic enjoyment of the shoreline for a
substantial number of people.
(b) Recreational developments should facilitate appropriate use of shoreline
resources while conserving them. These resources include, but are not
limited to, cultural resources , accretion shoreforms, wetlands, soils,
groundwater, surface water, native plant and animal life, and shore
processes.
( c) Recreational facilities should be a combination of active and passive
types. Location of such facilities should consider the ecological function
and sensitive nature of the shoreline in order to avoid adverse impacts. For
example, wildlife and habitat preservation areas with sensitive shoreline
habitat should have low-impact recreational uses.
( d) Recreational developments and plans should provide the regional
population with a varied and balanced choice ofrecreation experiences in
appropriate locations. Public agencies should coordinate their plans and
activities to provide a wide variety ofrecreational opportunities without
needlessly duplicating facilities.
(e) Recreational development should encourage the linkage of shoreline
parks, recreation areas, and public access points with linear systems such
as hiking paths, bicycle paths, easements, and scenic drives.
(f) When feasible, recreation facilities should incorporate public education
regarding shoreline ecological functions and processes, the role of human
actions on the environment, and the importance of public involvement in
shoreline management. Opportunities incorporating educational and
interpretive information should be pursued in design and operation of
recreation facilities and nature trails.
(g) Recreational development should be located and designed to preserve,
enhance, or create scenic views and vistas.
(13) Residential Development Policies:
(a) Consider single-family residential development as a priority use.
(b) Locate and construct residential development in a manner that ensures no
net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
( c) Ensure the overall density of development, lot coverage, and height of
structures is appropriate to the physical capabilities of the site and
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Am;her QE.1\/0Rozca & l\ssos.iatosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
13
Page 223 of 412
JuAe 2015Februa ry DeGember 20232
( d) Ensure new residential development provides adequate buffers or
open space from the water to protect ecological functions and
ecosystem-wide processes, preserve views, preserve shoreline aesthetic
characteristics, protect the privacy of nearby residences, and minimize use
conflicts.
( e) Make adequate provisions for services and infrastructure necessary to
support residential development.
(f) Design and locate residential development to preserve existing shoreline
vegetation, control erosion, and protect water quality.
(g) Design and locate new residences so shoreline stabilization will not be
necessary to protect the structure. The creation of new residential lots
should demonstrate the lots can be developed without:
(i) Constructing shoreline stabilization structures ( such as
bulkheadst t.,
(ii) Causing significant erosion or slope instability;J!:filb ; llfta
(iliL_Removing existing native vegetation within shoreline buffers~,and
ii . iv lDisturbin cultural resources.
(14) Shoreline Habitat and Natural Systems Enhancement Projects Policies:
(a) Include provisions for shoreline vegetation restoration or enhancement,
fish and wildlife habitat enhancement, and low-impact development
techniques in projects located within shoreline jurisdiction, where feasible.
(b) Encourage and facilitate implementation of projects and programs
included in the SMP Shoreline Restoration Plan.
(15) Shoreline Stabilization Policies:
(a) Locate and design new development, including subdivisions, to eliminate
the need for new shoreline modification or stabilization.
(b) Design, locate, size, and construct new or replacement structural shoreline
stabilization measures to minimize and mitigate the impact of these
modifications on the City's shorelines.
( c) Give preference to non-structural shoreline stabilization measures over
structural shoreline st:aeili2atieft, anastabilization and give preference to
soft structural shoreline stabilization over hard structural shoreline
stabilization.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGR0r QEIVOROE3 & AssosiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
14
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 224 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry Desember 20232
( d) Allow location, design, and construction of riprap and other bank
stabilization measures primarily to prevent damage to existing
development or to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the City's
residents.
(e) Encourage fish-friendly shoreline design during new construction and
redevelopment by offering incentives and regnlatory flexibility.
(16) Utilities Policies:
(a) Allow for utility maintenance and extension with criteria for location and
vegetation restoration as appropriate.
(b) Plan, design, and locate utility facilities to minimize harm to shoreline
functions, preserve the natural landscape, and minimize conflicts with
present and future planned land and shoreline uses, while meeting the
needs of future populations in areas planned to accommodate growth.
(c) Do not permit new non-water-oriented primary utility production and
processing facilities or parts of those facilities, such as power plants,
solid waste storage, or disposal facilities, within shoreline jurisdiction
unless no other options are feasible. Primary utility facilities, such as
wastewater treatment plants, and expansion of existing facilities should be
located in shoreline jurisdiction only if no practical upland alternative or
location exists. Such facilities and expansions should be designed and
located to minimize impacts on shoreline ecological functions, including
riparian and aquatic areas, and to the natural landscape and aesthetics.
Public health and safety should be the highest priority for the planning,
development, and operation of primary utility facilities.
( d) Locate utility transmission facilities for the conveyance of services, such
as power lines, cables, and pipelines, outside of shoreline jurisdiction
where feasible. Where permitted within shoreline jurisdiction, such
facilities should be located within existing or approved road crossings,
rights-of-way, and corridors or in such a way as to minimize potential
adverse impacts on shoreline areas. Joint use of rights-of-way and
corridors in shoreline areas should be encouraged.
(e) Locate new utility facilities so as not to require extensive shoreline
protection works.
(t) Locate utility facilities and corridors to protect scenic views from public
parks and trails. Whenever possible, such facilities should be placed
underground or alongside or under bridges.
(g) Design utility facilities and rights-of-way to preserve the natural landscape
and to minimize conflicts with present and planned land uses.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ansher QE/\/Onezca & AssesiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
15
Page 225 of 412
JuRe 2016 February 9esember 20232
( 17) Existing Uses Policies:
(a) Allow nonconforming, existing legal uses and structures to continue in
accordance with this SMP. Residential structures and appurtenant
structures that were legally established and are used for a conforming use
(but do not meet standards for setbacks, buffers, or yards), area, bulk,
height, or density, should be considered a conforming structure.
(b) Allow alterations of nonconforming structures, uses, and lots in
consideration of historic development patterns when occupied by preferred
uses and consistent with public safety and other public purposes.
( c) Encourage transitions from nonconforming uses to conforming uses.
(d) Allow for nonconforming structures to expand when they do not increase
the nonconformity according to SMP requirements.
( e) Allow for existing roads, driveways, and utility lines to continue and
expand when they do not increase the nonconformity according to SMP
requirements.
(f) Consider the no net loss of ecological function objective to guide review
of proposed expansions or other changes to nonconforming uses and new
development on nonconforming vacant lots. This objective may be
addressed in an area-wide manner consistent with the SMP cumulative
impacts analysis.
4.5 Conservation Element
(Goals and policies for Environmental Protection, Critical Areas, and Shoreline Vegetation
Conservation, and Water Quality, Stormwater Management, and Nonpoint Pollution)
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Protect the existing hydraulic, hydrologic, and habitat functions,
as well as scenic and recreational values, of City's shorelines and the
McNary Pool.
(2) General Policies:
(a) Develop and implement management practices that will ensure a sustained
yield of renewable resources of the shorelines while preserving,
protecting, enhancing, and restoring unique and non-renewable shoreline
resources, environments, or features.
(b) To the greatest extent feasible, reclaim and restore areas that are
biologically and aesthetically degraded while maintaining appropriate use
of the shoreline.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARshor QEi!/ORoZ"a & AssosiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
16
Page 226 of 412
J1me 2015 Februa ry Desember 20232
( c) Preserve scenic vistas, aesthetics, fisheries and wildlife habitat, and other
critical areas.
(d) Protect shoreline processes and ecological functions through regulatory
and non-regulatory means that may include acquisition of key properties,
conservation easements, regulation of development within shoreline
jurisdiction, and incentives to private property owners to encourage
ecologically sound design and implementation of best land management
practices.
( e) Protect and manage shoreline-associated wetlands, including maintenance
of sufficient volumes of surface and subsurface drainage into wetlands, to
sustain existing vegetation and wildlife habitat.
(f) Work with other jurisdictional agencies in the region and with the private
sector to deal effectively with regional and watershed-wide natural
environment issues and the protection, preservation, and enhancement of
all shoreline areas as fish and wildlife habitat.
(g) Manage development to avoid risk and damage to property and loss oflife
from geological conditions.
(h) Regulate development within the SMP area of the 100-year floodplain to
avoid risk and damage to property and loss of life.
(i) Prohibit the introduction of invasive plant species along the shereliHe,
aHashorelines and encourage the removal of noxious and invasive weeds
and trees.
(j) Protect, enhance, and maintain healthy vegetation consistent with the local
climate and nature of shoreline.
(3) Critical Areas:
(a) Goals:
(i) Goal A: Promote public health and welfare by instituting local
measures to preserve naturally occurring wetlands, critical aquifer
recharge areas, geologically hazardous areas, frequently flooded
areas (also see SMP Section 1-4.7: Flood Hazard Management
goals and policies), and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas
that exist in the City's shoreline jurisdiction for their associated
value.
(ii) Goal B: Reduce the threat posed to the health and safety of citizens
from commercial, residential, or industrial development that may
be sited in areas of significant geologic hazard.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AnGhor Qf;l'/Onei"a & AsseG.iales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
17
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 227 of 412
June 201 liFebruary Deseml:ler 20232
(iii) Goal C: Identify categories offish and wildlife habitat
conservation areas in the City's shoreline jurisdiction, based in part
on information supplied by Washington State Department of Fish
and Wildlife's (WDFW's) Priority Habitat and Species Program
and other sources.
(iv) Goal D: Protect local wildlife values and reflect the needs and
desires of the public.
(b) Policies:
(i) Recognize that critical areas may serve a variety of vital functions,•
including, but not limited to, flood storage and conveyance, water
quality protection, recharge and discharge areas for groundwater,
erosion control, sediment control, fish and wildlife habitat,
recreation, education, and scientific research.
(ii) Implement protection measures that strive to spare identified value
and function of critical areas that may be in jeopardy from new
development proposals. However, these regulations shall not
prohibit uses legally existing on any parcel prior to their adoption.
(iii) Avoid unnecessary duplication with various legal means and levels
of government that already address protection of wetlands, and
promote cooperation and coordination whenever possible.
(iv) Recognize that risks from geologic hazards can be reduced or
mitigated to acceptable levels through engineering design or
modified construction practices. In other cases where technological
efforts are not sufficient to reduce associated risks, building is best
avoided. Cooperate witli federal, state, and private agencies and
individuals who have primary authority to manage specific fish
and wildlife habitat conservation areas within certain parts of the
City.
(v) Encourage preservation of adequate size blocks ofland necessary
for species survival and corridor areas that allow for migratory
travel.
(vi) Recognize that species of wildlife in tlie City's locality are in a
state of continuing flux, and a prudent understanding of this
phenomenon is vital in guiding decision makers to balance
conservation of wildlife species with promotion of wise, desirable
growtli.
4.6 Historic, Cultural, Scientific, and Educational Resources Element
(1) Goals:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AAollor QEA'OAoza & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
18
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 228 of 412
J11Re :101 li Februa ryl:JeGember 2023:1
(a) Goal A: Identify, preserve, and protect historical, cultural, and
archaeological resources found to be significant by recognized local, state,
or federal processes in com pliance with State and Federal laws .
(b) Goal B: Encourage educational and scientific projects and programs that
foster a greater appreciation for the importance of shoreline management,
water-oriented activities, environmental conservation, and local historic
connections with the City's shoreline.
(2) Policies :
(a) Identify, protect, preserve, and restore important archeological , historic,
and cultural sites located in shoreline areas.
(b) Encourage educational projects and programs that foster a greater
appreciation of the importance of shoreline management, maritime
activities , environmental conservation, and maritime history, consistent
with protecting no net loss of ecological functions .
(c) Prevent public or private uses and activities from damaging, altering,
removing, or destroying any site having historic, cultural, scientific, or
educational value without appropriate analysis and mitigation.
4.7 Flood Hazard Management Element
(I) Goals :
(a) Goal A : Protect public safety within river floodways and floodplains while
recognizing that water levels in Columbia and Snake rivers are generally
stable as part of the McNary Pool. Protect natural systems by preserving
the flood storage function of floodplains.
(b) Goal B: Diminish potential hazards that may be caused by inappropriate
development in areas where severe and costly flooding is anticipated to
occur.
(2) Policies:
(a) Manage development proposed within floodplains and floodways
consistent with the SMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) standards, and Critical Area Regulations for frequently flooded
areas contained within this SMP.
(b) Implement protection measures designed to minimize hazards in
frequently flooded areas that already exist as detailed in
Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) 24.20, Provisions for Flood Hazard
Protection.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGRer QE-AlORecza & AsseGiales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
19
Page 229 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry Desemller 20232
(c) Work with Franklin County and state and federal agencies to deal
effectively with regional flooding issues.
( d) Control storrnwater runoff in a manner consistent with low-impact
development practices, which utilize natural detention, retention, and
recharge techniques.
(e) Prohibit any development within the floodplain that would individually or
cumulatively cause any increase in the base flood elevation beyond FEMA
standards.
4.8 Private Property Right
(1) Goals:
(a) Goal A: Recognize and protect private property rights in shoreline uses
and developments consistent with the public interest.
(2) Policies:
(a) Shoreline uses should be located and designed to respect private property
rights, maintain privacy of private property, be compatible with the
shoreline environment, protect ecological functions and processes, and
protect aesthetic values of the shoreline.
(b) Public access to shoreline, such as trails, bikeways, or roads, should
consider the privacy of private property owners when locating them near
private properties.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AAcher QElliOAew & AsseeiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
20
Page 230 of 412
J11Re 201 li Februa ry Deseml:>er 202~
SECTION II: Shoreline Regulations
Article I. Authority and Purpose
29.01.010 Authority
(1) The SMA of 1971, RCW 90.58, is the authority for the enactment and
administration of this SMP.
29.01.020 Applicability
This SMP a pp lies to all develo pment. the construction or exterior alteration of--~"<: -
structures ; dred gin l!.; drilling; dumping; fillin g: removal of an v sand , gravel .
minerals or vegetation ; bulkheading; driving of piling: nlacin g of obstructions : or
an\ pro ject of a permanent or tem po rar, nature which interferes with the normal
public use of the surface of the waters of the state sub iect to Chapter 90.58 RCW
at an 1 stage of water level. Develo pment does not include the followin g activities:
ra)
<b l
l c l
!d i
Interior buildinu im provements:
Exterior structure maintenance activities . including paintin g and roofin g.
as lon g as it does not expand the existin g foo tprint of the structure;
Routine landscape maintenance of established, ornamental landscapin g.
such as lawn mowine. r runing and weedin g:
Maintenance of the followin g existing facilities that does not ex pand the
affected area: septic tanks (routine cleanin g). wells . and individual utili ty
service connections:
( e ) Dismantling or removin g structures if there is no other associated
develo nment or redevelo pment:
1 I) Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355 . an\ person conducting a remedial action at a
faci!it ,· pursuant to a consent decree. order. or a l!reed order issued
ursuant to RCW 70.305 or to Ecolo 1."' when it conducts a remedial
action underRCW 70.305 :
I g) Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355 , am person installing site im provements for
storm water treatment in an existin g boatv ard facilit y to meet rn}U irements
of a national rollutant discharge elimination svstem storm water general
permit;
{h l Washinll ton State Department of Trans portation nro iects and activities
meeting the conditions ofRCW 90.58.356 ;
tiL Pro jects consistent wjth an environmental excellence prol?r am a !!.feement
pursuant to RCW 90.58.045 and RCW 43.21K:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGRer QE/\lOReza & Asseciates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
21
Formatted: Font: nmes New Roman
Formatted: Outline numbered+ Level: 1 + Numbering
Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned a
0.5'' + Indent at: 1"
( Formatted: Heading 6, No bullets or numbering --~---
Page 231 of 412
J11Ro 3016 February Qosember 20232
(J) Pro jects authorized through the Energ\ Facilitv Site Evaluation Council
nrocess , pursuant to RCW 80.50; and
Areas and uses in those areas that are under exclusive federal jurisdiction
as established through federal or state statutes are not sub ject to the
jurisdiction ofRCW 90.58.
~This SMP shall apply to all of the shoreline areas, waters, and critical areas
within the shoreline jurisdiction of the City as described in SMP Section I,
Shoreline Goals and Policies, Profile of the Shoreline Jurisdiction, within the
city limits of the City of Pasco.
~All proposed uses, activities, or development occurring within shoreline
jurisdiction must conform to the intent and requirements ofRCW 90.58, the
SMA, and this SMP whether or not a permit or other form of authorization is
required. See SMP Shoreline Goals and Policies section for the shoreline
jurisdiction description and SMP Article VII for the definition ofuses,
activities, and development.
~The SMP applies to shoreline jurisdiction within the City limits; this SMP will
not apply to shorelines in the UGAs until the annexation of the UGA areas to
City is finalized.
~Pursuant to WAC 173-27-060, federal agency activities may be required by
other federal laws to meet the permitting requirements ofRCW 90.58. This
SMP shall apply to all nonfederal developments and uses undertaken on federal
lands and on lands subject to nonfederal ownership, lease, or easement, even
though such lands may fall within the external boundaries offederal ownership.
W@_As recognized by RCW 90.58.350, the provisions of this SMP shall not affect
treaty rights ofNative American tribes.
fe1ffi_Maps indicating the extent of shoreline jurisdiction and shoreline designations
are guidance only. They are to be used in conjunction with the most current
scientific and technical information available, field investigations, and on-site
surveys to accurately establish the location and extent of shoreline jurisdiction
when a project is proposed. All areas meeting the definition of a shoreline of the
state or a SSWS, whether mapped or not, are subject to the provisions of this
SMP.
29.01.030 Purpose
( 1) The purposes of this SMP are:
(a) To promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the City by
providing comprehensive policies and effective, reasonable regulations for
development, use, and protection of jurisdictional shorelines;
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AnGRor QEA/Oneza & AssesialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
22
Page 232 of 412
June 2Q16 Februa rv1Jesem1Jer 20232
(b) To further assume and carry out the local government responsibilities
established by the SMA in RCW 90.58 .050, including planning and
administering the regulatory program consistent with the policy and
provisions of the SMA in RCW 90.58.020;
(i) To provide a high quality shoreline environment where:
(ii) Recreational opportunities are abundant;
(iii) The public enjoys access to and views of shoreline areas;
(iv) Natural systems are preserved, restored, or enhanced;
(v) Ecological functions of the shoreline are maintained and improved
overtime;
(vi) Water-oriented uses are promoted consistent with the shoreline
character and environmental functionst ilft6
(c) To apply special conditions to those uses that are not consistent with the
control of pollution and prevention of damage to the natural environment
or are not unique to or dependent on use of the state's shoreline; and
( d) To ensure no net loss of ecological functions associated with the shoreline.
29.01.040 Relationship to Other Codes, Ordinances, and Plans
(I) All applicable federal, state, and local laws shall apply to properties in the
shoreline jurisdiction. Where this SMP makes reference to any RCW, WAC, or
other state or federal law or regulation, the most recent amendment or current
edition shaJI apply.
(2) In the event provisions of this SMP conflict with provisions offederal, state, or
city regulations, the provision that is most protective of shoreline resources shall
prevail. It is understood that the provisions of this SMP may not allow
development to occur at what otherwise might be the property's full wning
potential.
(a) Local plans or programs include, but are not limited to:
(i) PMC 24.20 -Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection
(ii) PMC Title 23, Environmental Impact
(iii) PMC Title 25 , Zoning
(b) State and federal programs include, but are not limited to:
(i) Washington State Hydraulic Project Permits (HPA)
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARshor QE"IORoea & Assos.ia/es White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
23
~tted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
f Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 233 of 412
June 2015 February Desember 20232
(ii) Washington State Pesticide Applicator License Requirements
(iii) Washington State Waste Discharge Permits
(iv) Washington State Water Quality Certification Requirements (401)
(v) USACE 404 Permits and Section 10 Permits
(3) The policies in the SMP, contained in the SMP elements, state those underlying
objectives that the regulations are intended to accomplish. The policies guide
the interpretation and enforcement of the SMP regulations contained in
PMC 29.01. The policies are not regulations in themselves and, therefore, do
not impose requirements beyond those set forth in the regulations.
(4) This SMP contains Critical Area Regulations in PMC 29.01 Article V,
applicable only in shoreline jurisdictions that provide a level of protection to
critical areas assuring no net loss of shoreline ecological functions necessary to
sustain shoreline natural resources (RCW 36. 70A.480). In the event of a conflict
between the requirements of this code and any other code or ordinance of the
City, the regulation that provides the greater protection for the particular critical
area within shoreline jurisdiction shall apply.
(5) Projects in the shoreline jurisdiction that have either been deemed technically
complete through the application process or have been approved through local
and state reviews prior to the adoption of this SMP are considered accepted.
Major changes or new phases of projects that were not included in the originally
approved plan will be subject to the policies and regulations of this SMP.
29.01.050 Liberal Construction
(1) According to RCW 90.58.900, SMA is exempted from the rule of strict
construction, and it shall be liberally construed to give full effect to the
objectives and purposes for which it was enacted.
29.01.060 Severability
(I) Should any section or provision of this SMP be declared invalid, such decision
shall not affect the validity of this SMP as a whole.
29.01.070 Effective Date
(1) The SMP is hereby adopted on tae--l-ffilV-6tf-1)1.A 2023 This SMP and all
amendments thereto shall become effective fourteen 0 4} days after final
approval and adoption by Ecology.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AR&/Jor Q/i;4/0ReiB3 & AssoGialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
24
Page 234 of 412
JIJR8 :.!01 liFebrua ry0eGeFRb8F 2023.!-
29.01.080 Definitions
(1) "Act" means the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA),
Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 90.58.
(2) "Aoti,•e fault" fflOBflS a fault that is ooHsidered like!)' to uHdergo reHe•Ned
ffl0¥0fflOHt withiH a period of ooHoem to ffilfflans. Faults aFe eofflmoHly
ooHsidered to be aeti>.·e if the fa.ult ha5 fflo,•ed oHe or fflOre times in the last
l 0,000 years.
fBGL" Additions" means improvements to an existing building or structure, the cost
of which does not exceed 50% of the assessed value of the total structure or
result in an increase greater than 25% of the building footprint (up to a
maximum of 500 square feet) before the addition is started. Additions must
share a common wall (one full side) with the original structure.
t4).QL"Adjacent," for purposes of applying Article V -Critical Areas, means
immediately adjoining (in contact with the boundary of the influence area) or
within a distance less than that needed to separate activities from critical areas
to ensure protection of the functions and values of the critical areas. Adjacent
shall mean any activity or development located:
(5)
(6)
(a) On-site immediately adjoining a critical area; or
(b) A distance equal to or Jess than the required critical area buffer width and
building setback.
"Agrieultural aotiYities" !fleaHs agrioultural uses and praetiees ifleluding, hut not
limited to: produoiHg, breediflg, or iHoreasing agrio11H!lral produets; rotatiRg and
eh.anging agricultural erops; allowing lfil!d used fer agricultllral aotiYities to lie
fallow iH whieh it is plowed ood tillee but loft unseeded; allowing loot! used for
agricultural aetiYities to lie doffflaHt as a result ofad,•erse agrioultUFal fflarket
oonditians; allov,•iag laHe 11sed for agrieultllral aetiYities ta lie eormoot beoause
the land is eflfelled iH a local, state, er federal eeHservatien program, er the laHd
is subject te a ceHsen·atioH easOffleHt; eoHdueting agrieultural operations;
fflaintaiHiHg, repairiHg, ood replaoing agrieulrural equipmeHt; maiHtaiHing,
repairiHg, aHd replaeing agrieultural faeilities, prn·;ided that the replaeemOHt
faoility is Ho oloser to the shoreliae than the origiaal faoility; ood maiHtaiHiHg
agric11lt11ral laHds !lader productioH or eultivatien. Also see defiHitioH of
":P.lew Agrioult11Fal Aoti·rities" below.
"Agrieultural produots" iHoludes: but is Hot limited to hertioultllral, vitieultllral,
ilorio11lt11ral, aHd ·,•egetable, fruit, berry, grain, hops, hay, straw, tllff, sod, seed,
and BJ3iary produots; feed or forage for liYestoek; Christmas trees; hybrid
eettoHweed afld similar hardwood trees growfl as cre13s and han•ested withifl
20 years of planting; ans lh•estoek, inel1c1ding eoth the animals themsel·tes and
animal 13roduots ineluding, eut net limited to, meat, u13land finfish, peultry and
poultry 13reduots, ana dairy 13roduets.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
25 Anshor QEA/Ono2a & /!.ssocialos White Bluffs Consultin g
Page 235 of 412
(7)
(8)
June 201 liFebruaryDeGemller 20232
"Agricu-ltufa-l eEf!iipment" incrades, but is net limited te, the fellewing used in
agriculrura-l eperntiens:
(a)
(b)
(c)
EEf!iipment; machinery; censtructed shelteFs, buildings, and pends; fences;
upland finfish rearing facilities; 'Natef diYefsien, withdfavra-l, cenYeyance,
and use eEf!iipment and facilities including, but net limited ts, pumps,
pipes, tapes, cana-ls, ditches, and drnins;
Ceffidefs and facilities fef tfansperting peFsennel, liYesteek, and
eEJ-Uipment ts, ftem, and within agrieultufal lands;
Farm fesidenees and asseciated eEf!iipment, lands, and facilities; and
fe-XILRoadsido stands and on farm markets fef ma£keting fruit or Yegetables.
Agricu-lrural facilities. See "Agricultufal etJuipment."
~"Agricultural land" means those specific land areas on which agriculture
activities are conducted as of the date of adoption of a local Shoreline Master
Program (SMP) pursuant to these guidelines as evidenced by aerial photography
or other documentation. After the effective date of the SMP, land converted to
agricultural use is subject to compliance with the requirements of the SMP.
~"Alteration," for purposes of applying Article V -Critical Areas, means any
human-induced change in an existing condition of a critical area or its buffer.
Alterations include grading, filling, dredging, channelizing, clearing
(vegetation), applying pesticides, discharging waste, construction, compaction,
excavation, modifying for storm water management, relocating, or other
activities that change the existing landform, vegetation, hydrology, wildlife, or
habitat value of critical areas.
~"Amendment" means a revision, update, addition, deletion, and/or reenactment
to an existing SMP.
~"Applicant" means a person who files an application for a permit under this
SMP and who is either the owner of the land on which that proposed activity
would be located, a contract purchaser, or the authorized agent of such a person.
~"Approval" means an official action by a local government legislative body
agreeing to submit a proposed SMP or amendments to Ecology for review and
official action pursuant to this SMP or an official action by Ecology to make a
local government SMP effective, thereby incorporating the approved SMP or
amendment into the SMP.
~" Aquaculture" means the culture or farming of fish or other aquatic plants and
animals.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARcher Q&IORe2ca & l'.ssecialesWhite Bluffs Consultinq
Draft
26
Page 236 of 412
J11Re 2015 Februa ry DeGember 20232
~"Aquifer recharge area" means an area through which precipitation and
surface water infiltrate the soil and are transmitted through rocks and soil to
create groundwater storage. They are also areas where an aquifer that is a source
of drinking water is vulnerable to contamination that would affect the potability
of water.
~"Area oflnfluence" encompasses an area that is 2.5 times the height of a
slope. The Area oflnfluence applies to areas that have geologically hazardous
attributes consistent with an Erosion or Landslide Hazard Area as defined in
Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) 29.01.080, Definitions, and PMC 29.01.560,
Geological Hazard Areas. This mapped area surrounds the hazard area from all
points for a distance of 2.5 times the height of the applicable slope. Areas with a
15% slope or greater as its only attribute do not have an Area of Influence.
(17) "Area efsha-llew fleeaing" means a aesignatea AO eF AH 2:ene en the Fleoa
lnsm=ance Rate Map (FlRMs). AO is charaeteri2:ea as sheet flow ana AH
inaieates ponaing. The base floea aepths raage from 1 to 3 feet; a elearly
aefinea chatmel aees not rndst; the path offlooaiag is aHpFeaictable ana
inaeteffflinate; ana velocity flow may be e'riaeat.
(18) "Area efspeeial floea ha2:aro" means the lane in the fleeaplain within a
cemmanity sabject to a 1% Of greatef chaace offleoaiag ia any giyea year.
Designatien on maps always iaclaaes the letteFs A or V.
~"Assessed value" means assessed valuation shall be as established by the
County assessor's office, unless otherwise provided by a market appraisal
institute appraisal.
~"Associated wetlands" are those wetlands that are in proximity to and
either influence or are influenced by a stream subject to the SMA.
~"Average grade level" means the average of the natural or existing
topography of the portion of the lot, parcel, or tract ofreal property that will be
directly under the proposed building or structure. In the case of structures to be
built over water, average grade level shall be the elevation of the ordinary high
water mark (OHWM). Calculation of the average grade level shall be made by
averaging the ground elevations at the midpoint of all exterior walls of the
proposed building or structure.
~"Base flood" means a flood having a 1 % chance of being equaled or
exceeded in any given year. Also referred to as the "100-year flood." Designated
on FIRM with the letters A or V.
~"Base flood elevation" means the water surface elevation of the base
flood. It shall be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988.
~"Basement" means any area of a building having its floor subgrade (below
ground level) on all sides.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anshor QEI\/One,za & Aooec.ialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
27
Page 237 of 412
June 2015 February Desemller 20232
~"Best management practices (BMPs)" means conservation practices or
systems of practice and management measures that:
(a) Control soil loss and reduce water quality degradation caused by high
concentrations of nutrients, animal waste, toxics, and sediment;
(b) Minimize adverse impacts on surface water and groundwater flow, and
circulation patterns, and the chemical, physical, and biological
characteristics of wetlands;
(c) Protect trees and vegetation designated to be retained during and following
site construction; and
( d) Provide standards for proper use of chemical herbicides within critical
areas.
(2a) "Best Management Pi=aetiees, Agrieultlffill" means systems of13faotiees,
sehedules of aetivities, fJfohi-eitions, maifltenanee 13roeedufes, and managemeB-t
meaSHFes that fJftWent Of minimize adv&se imfiaets to the enYifonmeB-t. Suell.
IJfaetiees may lie sHlljeet to 'faeying eonei-tions, Vihieh meiHde geogi:Elf3hieal
loeation, weath&, soil Of min&al t:,'f)es and eonditions, t:,'f)e ofeFOfl Of livestoek,
tJIJe ofminiflg, and managemeB-t systems. GeneFally aeeE!fJted agi:ieultlffal
B~fPs ifleiHde those fJf&etiees historieally earned out in the Fegien and these
fJf&etiees defined by the State oPNashingten, D0f3artment ofAgriSHltlffe,
Feeemmendatiens b;· the U.S. D0f3a.rtment efAgriSH!tlffe, and otheF fJFofessional
and indeslty agrieultltfal oFganizatiens.
~"Boating facilities" allowed in the City include boat launches and upland
boat storage, marinas, and other boat moorage structures or uses. For the
purposes of this SMP, boating facilities excludes docks serving four or fewer
single-family residences.
~"Breakwater" means an offshore structure whose primary purpose is to
protect harbors, moorages, and navigation activity from wave and wind action
by creating stillwater areas along shore. A secondary purpose is to protect
shorelines from wave-caused erosion. Breakwaters are generally built parallel to
shore, may or may not be connected to land, and may be floating or stationary.
~"Buffer, Critical Areas," means an area, which provides the margin of
safety through protection of slope stability, attenuation of surface water flows
and landslide hazards reasonably necessary to minimize risk to the public from
loss of life or well-being or property damage resulting from natural disasters, or
an area which is an integral part of a stream or wetland ecosystem and which
provides shading, input of organic debris and coarse sediments, room for
variation in stream or wetland boundaries, habitat for wildlife and protection
from harmful intrusion necessary to protect the public from losses suffered
when the functions and values of aquatic resources are degraded.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ane/:ior Q&'>./Onoza & AssoeiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
28
Page 238 of 412
June 201 &FebruaryDeGember 20232
(30) "Building setbaelc line" means a line BCJJ'Ond whieh the foundation ofa straetUfe
shall not extend.
~"City" means the City of Pasco.
~"Clearing" means the cutting, killing, grubbing, or removing of vegetation
or other organic material by physical, mechanical, chemical, or any other
similar means.
~"Cluster" means a group of three or more significant trees with
overlapping or touching crowns.
~"Community access" means a shoreline access available to a group or
community (e.g., homeowners association), which may not be accessible to
general public.
~"Compensation project" means actions specifically designed to replace
project-induced critical area and buffer losses. Compensation project design
elements may include land acquisition, planning, construction plans,
monitoring, and contingency actions.
~"Compensatory mitigation" means types of mitigation used to replace
project-induced critical areas and buffer losses or in1pacts .
~"Critical aquifer recharge area" means those areas that are:
(a) Designated as "Wellhead Protection Areas" pursuant to the Washington
Administrative Code (WAC) 246-290-135( 4) and the groundwater
contribution area in WAC 246-291-100 (2)(e). Wellhead protection areas
shall, for the purpose of this regulation, include the identified recharge
areas associated with either Group A public water supply wells and those
Group B wells with a Wellhead Protection Plan filed with the
Franklin County Health District; and
(b) Identified in the Soil Survey of Pasco as having high potential for aquifer
recharge, including those soil types identified by the
Shoreline Administrator.
~"Crown" means the area of a tree containing leaf-or needle-bearing
branches.
~"Cultural and historic resources" means buildings, sites and areas having
archaeological, historic, cultural, or scientific value or significance.
(40) "Desig,mtea fleoaway" means tho regulatory fleedway that has heen deliueated
ou the City's FIRM.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ansher QIY\/Oneza & /1.sseGiales White Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
29
Page 239 of 412
June 2015 February DeGember 20232
(11) "De.,0eloJ3aele E!fea" meRRs a site or ):lOrtioB ofa site iliat may ee lltiltiied as ilie
loeatioB of develoJ:lmeBt, iB aeeordaRee Vliili ilie mies of iliis SMP.
~"Development" means a use consisting of.:-the construction or exterior
alteration of structures; dredging; drilling; dumping; filling; removal of any
sand, gravel, or minerals; bulk heading; driving of piling; placing of
obstructions; or any project of a permanent or temporary nature, which
interferes with the normal public use of the surface of the waters overlying lands
subject to the act at any stage of water level. "Develo pment" does not include
dismantling or removin g structures if there is no other associated develo!\ment
or re-develo pment.
~"Development permit" means any permit issued by the City or other
authorized agency, for construction, land use, or the alteration of land.
~"Dock" means, as a general term, a structure, or group of structures that
provides boat moorage or other uses. A dock may be made up of piers ( which
are structures on fixed piles) and floats (which float on the water's surface and
are typically attached to piles so that they may rise and fall with changes in the
water's elevation).
~"Dredging" means the removal of sediments from the bed of a waterbody
by mechanical means.
(1e) "Eeologieal fuHetioHs" or "shoreliBe fuHetioHs" meaHs ilie work peminHed or
role ):llayed ey ilie physieal, ehemiea-1, aHd eiologieal J:lfoeesses iliat eoffirieute to
ilie maif½teBaHee of ilie aEJ:Uatie aad terrestria-1 eBviroBmOBts that eoHstitute ilie
shoreliBe's Batura-1 eeosystem.
(:4-+-}llL_"Ecosystem-wide processes" means the suite of naturally occurring
physical and geologic processes of erosion, transport, and deposition, and
specific chemical processes that shape landforms within a specific shoreline
ecosystem and determine the types ofhabitat and the associated ecological
functions.
~"Erosion" means the detachment and movement of soil or rock by water,
wind, ice, or gravity.
~"Erosion hazard area" means those areas that, because of natural
characteristics, including vegetative cover, soil texture, slope gradient, rainfall
patterns, or human-induced changes to such characteristics, are vulnerable to
erosion.
~"Feasible" means, for the purpose of this SMP, that an action, such as a
development project, mitigation, or preservation requirement, meets all of the
following conditions: (a) the action can be accomplished with technologies and
methods that have been used in the past in similar circumstances, or studies or
tests have demonstrated in similar circumstances that such approaches are
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AnGRor QENGnera & AsseeialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
30
Page 240 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry Cesemller 20232
currently available and likely to achieve the intended results; (b) the action
provides a reasonable likelihood of achieving its intended purpose; and ( c) the
action does not physically preclude achieving the project's primary intended
legal use. In cases where these guidelines require certain actions, unless they are
infeasible, the burden of proving infeasibility is on the applicant. In determining
an action's infeasibility, the reviewing agency may weigh the action's relative
public costs and public benefits, considered in the short-and long-term time
frames.
~"Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)" means the agency
that oversees the administration of the National Flood Insurance Program (44
Code of Federal Regulation [CFR]).
~"Fill" means the addition of soil, sand, rock, gravel, sediment, earth
retaining structure, or other material to an area waterward of the OHWM, in
wetlands or on shoreline areas in a manner that raises the elevation or creates
dry land.
~"Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas" means areas necessary for
maintaining species in suitable habitats within their natural geographic
distribution so isolated subpopulations are not created as designated by
WAC 365-190-080(5). These areas include:
(a) Areas within which state and federal endangered and threatened species
exist, or state sensitive, candidate, and monitor species have a primary
association;
(b) Priority Habitat and Species Areas identified by the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW);
(c) Habitats and species oflocal importance that have been designated by the
City at the time of application;
(d) Naturally occurring ponds less than 20 acres and their submerged aquatic
beds that provide fish or wildlife habitat. These do not include ponds
deliberately designed and created from dry sites such as canals, detention
facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, temporary
construction ponds ofless than 3 years duration, and landscape amenities.
Naturally occurring ponds may include those artificial ponds intentionally
created from dry areas in order to mitigate conversion of ponds, if
permitted by a regulatory authority;
(e) Waters of the state as defined by WAC 222-16;
(t) Lakes, ponds, streams, and rivers planted with game fish by a
governmental or tribal entity;
(g) Areas with which anadromous fish species have a primary association; and
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QEIVOnoza & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
31
Page 241 of 412
JuRe 2016 FebruaryDeeemller 20232
(h) State natural area preserves and natural resources conservation areas.
~"Flood" or "flooding" mean a general and temporary condition of partial
or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from the overflow of inland
waters and/or the unusual and rapid accumulation of runoff or surface waters
from any source.
~"Flood hazard area" means any area subject to inundation by the base
flood or risk from channel migration, including, but not limited to, an aquatic
area, wetland, or closed depression.
~"Flood insurance rate map (FIRM)" means the official map on which the
Federal Insurance Administration has delineated both the areas of special flood
hazards and the risk premium zones applicable to the City.
(57) "Flee El iflslifanee stedy" means 1:he effieiR-1 FOJ30R f:IF0¥iEieEI ay 1:he FeEIOFal
lftslif!lnee anEI Mitiga-tien AtiministFatien 1:ha-t ineleties 1:he fleeEI rr-efiles, 1:he
FIRNI, anEI 1:he watOF suFfaee ele;,atien ef 1:he ease flee El (4 4 CFR Part 59).
f-S&illL_"Flood protection elevation" means an elevation that is I foot or more
above the base flood elevation.
~"Floodplain" is synonymous with 100-year floodplain and means that land
area susceptible to inundation with a I% chance of being equaled or exceeded in
any given year. The limit of this area shall be based on flood ordinance
regulation maps or a reasonable method, which meets the objectives of the
SMA.
(<iQ) "FleeElj3Feefing" means aEi8f)ta-tiens 1:ha-t enslife a strnetlife is sHl3stantially
rnsistant te the passage efwa-tOF aelew 1:he fleeEI proteetien ele;,atien anti Fesists
hyEifesta-tie anti h)•EiFeEiynamie leaEis anEI effeets efaeeyaney.
~"Floodway" means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the
adjacent land areas through which the base flood is discharged. Floodways
identified on flood boundary and floodway maps become "regulatory
floodways" within which encroachment of obstructions are prohibited.
(<i2) "Flee Elway EiepenEient strnetlife," feF pttFpeses ef 8flplying Artiele V Critieal
Ai=eas, means strnetlifes saeh as, eat Ret limiteEI te, Elams, liwees, pamp sta-tiens,
streamaank staailizatien, beat laanehes anEI FelateEI FeeFeatienal strnetarns,
aFiEige piOFs anEI abtttffients, anEI fisheries enhaneement ef stream FesteFa-tien
pt=ejeets.
~"Functions" and "values," for purposes of applying Article V -Critical
Areas, mean the beneficial roles served by critical areas, including, but not
limited to, water quality protection and enhancement, fish and wildlife habitat,
food chain support, flood storage, conveyance and attenuation, groundwater
recharge and discharge, erosion control, and recreation. Functions and values
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
/I.Rehor QE,1\/0Ro2,a & Assoc.'alosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
32
Page 242 of 412
June 201S FebruarvOeGeml3er 202~
may be considered independently, with functions being measured indicators
such as water quality, hydrologic functions, and habitat functions and values
being non-measured indicators such as local importance, potential qualities, or
recreational benefits.
~"Geological hazard areas" means areas that, because of their susceptibility
to erosion, sliding, earthquake, or other geologic events, are not suited to the
siting of commercial, residential, or industrial development consistent with
public health or safety concerns. Geological Hazard Areas include Erosion
Hazards, Landslide Hazards, Mine Hazards, and Seismic Hazards, as defined
herein and specified in PMC 29.01 .560.
~"Geotechnical Report" or "geotechnical analysis" means a scientific study
or evaluation conducted by a qualified expert that includes a description of the
ground and surface hydrology and geology, the affected landform and its
susceptibility to mass wasting, erosion, and other geologic hazards or processes,
conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of the proposed
development on geologic conditions, the adequacy of the site to be developed,
the impacts of the proposed development, alternative approaches to the
proposed development, and measures to mitigate potential site-specific and
cumulative geological and hydrological impacts of the proposed development,
including the potential adverse impacts on adjacent and down-current
properties. Geotechnical Reports shall conform to accepted technical standards
and must be prepared by qualified professional engineers or geologists who
have professional expertise about the regional and local shoreline geology and
processes.
~"Grading" means stripping, cutting, filling, or stockpiling ofland,
including the land in its cut or filled condition to create new grade.
~"Groin" means a barrier type of structure extending from the streambank
into a waterbody for the purpose of the protection of a shoreline and adjacent
uplands by influencing the movement of water or deposition of materials.
~"Ground cover" means all types of vegetation other than trees.
~"Guidelines" means those standards adopted by the department to
implement the policy ofRCW 90.58 for regulation of use of the shorelines of
the state prior to adoption of SMPs. Such standards shall also provide criteria
for local governments and the department in developing and amending SMPs.
~"Hazard areas" means areas designated as frequently flooded or
geologically hazardous areas due to potential for erosion, landslide, seismic
activity, mine collapse, or other geologically hazardous conditions, including
steep slopes.
~"Hazardous substance(s)" means:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor Qf;A/Onoza & l'.ssocla!os White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
33
Page 243 of 412
dune 2016Februa r Desember 20232
(a) A hazardous substance as defined by Section 101(14) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act; any substance designated pursuant to Section 311 (b )(2)(A) of the
Clean Water Act (CWA); any hazardous waste having the characteristics
identified under or listed pursuant to Section 3001 of the Solid Waste
Disposal Act (but not including any waste the regulation of which under
the Solid Waste Disposal Act has been suspended by Act of Congress);
any toxic pollutant listed under Section 307(a) of the CWA; or any
imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture with respect to
which the United States Environmental Protection Agency has taken
action pursuant to Section 7 of the Toxic Substances Control Act; and
(b) Hazardous substances that include any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge,
including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste,
regardless of quantity, that exhibit any of the physical, chemical, or
biological properties described in WAC 173-303-090, 173-303-102, or
173-303-103.
~"High-intensity land use" means land uses consisting of commercial,
urban, industrial, institutional, retail, residential with more than one unit per
acre, agricultural ( dairies, nurseries, raising and harvesting crops, requiring
annual tilling, and raising and maintaining animals), high-intensity recreation
(golf courses, ball fields), and hobby farms.
(73) "Heavy e4Hipmeat" meaas r;ash eoastreetioa maehiaery as aaekhoes, treaaea
traetors, EH!ffiJ'I treel,s, aaa fi:oat eaa loaaers.
f74rnL_"Hydraulic project approval (HPA)" means a permit issued by WDFW for
modification to waters of the state in accordance with RCW 75.20.
~"hnpervious surface area" means a hard surface area, which either
prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural
conditions prior to development. hnpervious surface shall also include a hard
surface area, which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at
an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to
development. Common impervious surfaces include rooftops, walkways, patios,
driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel
roads with compacted subgrade, packed earthen materials, and oiled, macadam
or other surfaces, which similarly impede the natural infiltration of storm water.
Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities shall not be considered as
impervious surfaces.
~"In-stream structures" function for the impoundment, diversion, or use of
water for hydroelectric generation and transmission (including public and
private facilities), flood control, irrigation, water supply (domestic and
industrial), recreation, or fisheries enhancement.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ammer Q/50,/Oneeca & AssesiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
34
Page 244 of 412
June 2016 FebruaryDesemller 20232'
~"Invasive, non-native vegetation species" means the plants listed for
Eastern Washington in Washington State Noxious Weed Board Publication
# 820-264E (N/6/09), or the latest version of this document.
~"Isolated wetland" means those wetlands and their buffers that are outside
of the following critical areas and their buffers, where applicable: 100-year
floodplain, lake, river, stream, or wetland. Isolated wetlands have no contiguous
hydric soil or hydrophytic vegetation between the wetland and any surface
water.
~"Landslide" means down slope movement of a mass of soil, rock, snow or
ice, including, but not limited to, rock falls, slumps, mud flows, debris flows,
torrents, earth flows, and snow avalanches.
~"Landslide hazard areas" means those areas potentially subject to
landslides based on a combination of geologic, topographic, and hydrologic
factors.
~"Low-intensity land use" includes forestry and open space (such as passive
recreation and natural resources preservation).
(82) "Lewest fleer" HJeaHs the lewest eRcleseel area (incleding aaseHJent) ef a
strucmFe. An enfinished or fleoel resistant encloS\lre, usaale selely fer parking
efyehieles, auilding aeeess, or sterage in aa area other than a aaseHJent area, is
net coRsielered a auilding's lov,est fleer, provided that sueh enelosure is not
auilt so as te reaeer the strueture in violation of the apfllieaale non ele•1atien
design retJuireHJents of these Critieal Area Regulations feuREl in FMC
29.01.550, F Fleee Hazare Areas (i.e., flrovieed there are adetJuate fleed
ventilatioR opooings).
~"May" means the action is acceptable, provided it conforms to the
provisions of this SMP.
~"Mitigation sequencing" means the process of avoiding, reducing, or
compensating for the adverse environmental impact(s) of a proposal, including
the following actions, listed in the order of preference, the first being the most
preferred:
(a) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an
action;
(b) Where impact on critical areas or their buffers will not be avoided,
demonstrating that the impact meets the criteria for granting a
Shoreline Variance Pennit or other administratively approved alteration;
(c) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and
its implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking
affirmative steps to avoid or reduce in1pacts;
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ano/:lor QENOno;1a & Asseoiates White Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
35
Page 245 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry Desemller 20232
( d) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected
environment;
(e) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and
maintenance operations during the life of the action;
(f) Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing
substitute resources or environments; and
(g) Monitoring the impact and the compensation projects and taking
appropriate corrective measures.
~"Mixed-use" or "Mixed-use development" means a combination of uses
within the same building or site as a part of an integrated development project
with functional interrelationships and coherent physical design that includes a
mix of water-oriented and non-water-oriented uses.
~"Moderate-intensity land use" includes residential at a density of 1-unit-
per-acre or less, moderate-intensity open space (parks), and agriculture
(moderate intensity land uses such as orchards and hay fields).
~"Monitoring" means the collection of data by various methods for the
purpose of understanding natural systems and features, evaluating the impact of
development proposals on such systems, and/or assessing the performance of
mitigation measures imposed as conditions of development.
~"Must" means a mandate; the action is required.
~"Native vegetation" means plant species that are indigenous to the region.
~"New agricultural activities" are activities that meet the definition of
agricultural activities but are proposed on land not in agricultural use at the
adoption date of this SMP.
IBL_"New construction" means structures for which the start of construction
commenced on or after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this SMP.
(75 ) "Nonconfom1iil!! develo pment" or ·'nonconforming structure" means an existing
structure that was lawfullv constructed at the time it was built but is no lon ger
full y consistent with present regu lations such as setbacks. buffers or \ ards : area :
bulk: hei ght or densi t\ standards due to subsc.xment changes to the master
r,ro gram.,
( 76 ) "Nonconforminc lot" means a lot that met dimensional re µuirements of the
arplicable master pro !!r am at the time of its establishment but now contains less
than the n:q uired width. depth or area due to subsequent changes to the master
r ro gram .
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QEl'/OnoZ£J & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
36
Formatted: Font color: Auto
Formatted: Font color: Auto, Pattern: Clear
Page 246 of 412
June 201 li FebruaryCecemller 20232
\-W-K 77 1 "Nonconformin l! use" means an existing shoreline use that was lawfulh
established prior to the effective date of the act or the applicable master
pro gram , but which does not conform to rresent use regulations due to
subs eq uent chan ues to the master pro gram.
~"Non-water-oriented uses" means those uses that are not water-dependent,
water-related, or water-enjoyment.
~"Normal maintenance" means those usual acts that are necessaiy to
prevent a property's decline, lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established
condition.
~"Normal repair" means to restore a structure or development to a state
comparable to its original condition including, but not limited to, its size, shape,
configuration, location, and external appearance, within a reasonable period
after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse
impacts on shoreline resources or environment. Replacement of a structure or
development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the
common method of repair for the type of structure or development, and the
replacement structure or development is comparable to the original structure or
development including, but not limited to, its size, shape, configuration,
location, and external appearance, and the replacement does not cause
substantial adverse impacts on shoreline resources or environment.
~"Ordinaiy high water mark (OHWM)" means that mark that will be found
by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action
of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinaiy years,
as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in
respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may naturally
change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or
the department. Where the OHWM cannot be found, it shall be the line of mean
high water. For braided streams, the OHWM is found on the banks forming the
outer limits of the depression within which the braiding occurs.
~"Practical alternative" means an alternative that is available and capable of
being carried out after taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and
logistics in light of overall project purposes, and having less impact on critical
areas.
(97) "Primifrie t-Fail" meaHs uHiHlflr0\'ed aHEl UHfla->;eEl, aut flh,,sioally defiHeEl
flathway fur Hen meteri;:iea m01,,ement.
~"Priority habitat" means a habitat type with unique or significant value to
one or more species. An area classified and mapped as priority habitat must
have one or more of the following attributes:
(a) Comparatively high fish or wildlife density;
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ammar QYJOnew & AssecialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
37
Page 247 of 412
Jyne 201 li FebruaryDesember 20232
(b) Comparatively high fish or wildlife species diversity;
(c) Fish spawning habitat;
( d) Important wildlife habitat;
(e) Important fish or wildlife seasonal range;
(f) Important fish or wildlife movement corridor;
(g) Rearing and foraging habitat
(h) Refugia habitat;
(i) Limited availability;
(j) High vulnerability to habitat alteration; or
(k) Unique or dependent species.
A priority habitat may be described by a unique vegetation type or by a dominant
plant species that is of primary importance to fish and wildlife. A priority habitat
may also be described by a successional stage (such as old growth and mature
forests). Alternatively, a priority habitat may consist of a specific habitat element
(such as caves or snags) of key value to fish and wildlife. A priority habitat may
contain priority and/or non-priority fish and wildlife.
~"Priority species" means species requiring protective measures and/or
management guidelines to ensure their persistence at genetically viable
population levels. Priority species are those that meet any of the following
criteria:
(a) Criterion I. State-listed or state-proposed species. State-listed species are
those native fish and wildlife species legally designated as endangered
(YI AC 232-12-014), threatened (WAC 232-12-011), or sensitive
(YI AC 232-12-011 ). State-proposed species are those fish and wildlife
species that will be reviewed by the WDFW (POL-M-6001) for possible
listing as endangered, threatened, or sensitive according to the process and
criteria defined in WAC 232-12-297.
(b) Criterion 2. Vulnerable aggregations. Vulnerable aggregations include
those species or groups of animals susceptible to significant population
declines, within a specific area or statewide, by virtue of their inclination
to congregate.
(c) Criterion 3. Species of recreational, commercial, and/or tribal importance.
Native and non-native fish and wildlife species ofrecreational or
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARo"1er Q~D/0Re20a & l'.sseoialosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
38
Page 248 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry December 20232
commercial importance and recognized species used for tribal ceremonial
and subsistence purposes that are vulnerable to habitat loss or degradation.
(d) Criterion 4. Species listed under the Federal Endangered Species Act as
either proposed, threatened, or endangered.
~"Provisions" means any definition, policy, goal, regulation, requirement,
standard, authorization, prohibition, guideline criteria, or environment
designations.
~"Public Access" means physical and visual access. Public access includes
the ability of the general public to reach, touch, and enjoy the water's edge, to
travel on the waters of the state, and to view the water and the shoreline from
adjacent locations. The following are examples of public access:
(a)
(b)
Visual Access. Visual public access may consist of view corridors,
viewpoints, or other means of visual approach to public waters, adjoining
habitat and wildlife areas. A visual aesthetic will include ve l!etation and
wildlife that exist alon g the shoreline and not just a view of the water.,
Physical Access. Physical public access may consist of a dedication of
land or easement and a physical improvement in the form of a walkway,
trail, bikeway, park, boat or canoe and kayak launching ramp, dock area,
view platform, or other area serving as a means of physical approach to
public waters.
~"Public Access Plan" means the City of Pasco's Rivershore Linkage and
Amenity Plan adopted on July 16, 2012.
~"Public agency" means every city, county, state, or federal office, every
officer, every institution, whether educational, correctional, or other, and every
department, division, board, and commission that provides services or
recommendations to the public or other such agencies.
~"Public utility" means a public service corporation performing some
public service subject to special governmental regulations, or a governmental
agency performing similar public services, either of which are paid for directly
by the recipients thereof. Such services shall include water supply, electric
power, gas, and transportation for persons and freight.
~"Qualified professional" means a person with experience and training in
the pertinent discipline, and who is a qualified expert with expertise appropriate
for the relevant critical area or shoreline subject. A qualified professional must
have obtained a B.S., B.A., or equivalent degree or certification in biology,
engineering, environmental studies, fisheries, geomorphology, landscape
architecture, forestry or related field, and 2 years of related work experience.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Am;hor Qt;;/VOROi!a & Assooiales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
39
Page 249 of 412
JuRe 2015 FebruaryDesember 20232
(a) A qualified professional for wildlife, habitats, or wetlands must have a
degree in biology, zoology, ecology, fisheries, or related field, and
professional experience in Washington State.
(b) A qualified professional for a geological hazard must be a professional
engineer or geologist, licensed in the State of Washington.
(c) A qualified professional for critical aquifer recharge areas means a
hydrogeologist, geologist, engineer, or other scientist with experience in
preparing hydrogeologic assessments.
( d) A qualified professional with flood and channel migration zone expertise
must be a hydrologist or fluvial geomorphologist.
( e) A qualified professional for vegetation management must be a registered
landscape architect, certified arborist, biologist, or professional forester
with a corresponding degree or certification.
(f) A qualified archaeologist must be a person qualified for addressing
cultural and historic resources protection and preservation, with a degree
in archaeology, anthropology, history, classics or other germane
disciplines with a specialization in archaeology and/or historic
preservation and with a minimum of 2 years of experience in preparing
Cultural Resource Site Assessments reports.
(-l{}{Bf2D_"Recreational development" means the modification of the natural or
existing environment to accommodate commercial and public facilities designed
and used to provide recreational opportunities to the public. Commercial
recreational development should be consistent with commercial development
defined herein.
~ml__"Recreational vehicle" means a vehicle designed primarily for recreational
camping, travel, or seasonal use that has its own mode of power or is mounted
on or towed by another vehicle, including, but not limited, to travel trailers,
folding camping trailers, truck campers, motor homes, motorized boats, and
multi-use vehicles or any structure inspected, approved, and designated a
recreational vehicle by and bearing the insignia of the State of Washington or
any other state or federal agency having the authority to approve recreational
vehicles.
~"Research and Monitoring" includes activities associated with identifying
data, and collecting, monitoring, and evaluating scientific data and information
to support water, fisheries, and other ecological services management,
restoration, and operational activities. Example activities that could be included
under this category include installing and operating stream and water quality
monitoring gages, collecting fisheries data using a trap or other devices, setting
up and using equipment to collect sediment data, and other data collection
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
A Rehor QEl',{()Rota & l'.ssosialos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
40
Page 250 of 412
June 201 li Februar vDesember 20232
activities that need to utilize the shoreline and waters of the state to meet public
objectives.
~"Residential development" entails one or more buildings, structures, lots,
parcels or portions thereof that are designed, used, or intended to be used as a
place of abode for human beings. These include single-family residences,
residential subdivisions, short residential subdivisions, attached dwellings, and
all accessory uses or structures normally associated with residential uses.
Accessory residential uses include garages, sheds, tennis courts, swimming
pools, parking areas, fences, cabanas, saunas, and guest cottages. Hotels,
motels, dormitories, or any other type of overnight or transient housing are
excluded from the residential category and must be considered commercial uses
depending on project characteristics.
~"Restore," "Restoration," or "Ecological restoration" means the
reestablishment or upgrading of impaired natural or enhanced ecological
shoreline processes or functions. This may be accomplished through measures,
including, but not limited to, revegetation, removal of intrusive shoreline
structures, and removal or treatment of toxic materials. Restoration does not
imply a requirement for returning the shoreline area to pre-aboriginal, or pre-
European settlement conditions.
~"Riparian habitat" means areas adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing
water that contains elements of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems that mutually
influence each other.
~"Salmonid" means a member of the fish family Salmonidae, including:
King, Chinook, Coho, chum, sockeye, and pink salmon; cutthroat, brook,
brown, rainbow, and steelhead trout; kokanee; and native char (bull trout and
Dolly Varden).
(113) "SoetioH 404 P6f1Hit" moaHs a fl61'1Hit issaod J:Jy tho U.S. AnHy COFflS of
EHgiHoors (USAGE) fof the plae01Hent of dredge or fill material watorward of
tho Ol.PNM Of eloariHg iH waters of tho United States, inoladiHg wotlaHds, iH
aeeordaHoo with 33 U.S. Code Section 1344.
(-l-l-4){2fil_"Seismic hazard areas" means areas that are subject to severe risk of
damage as a result of earthquake-induced ground shaking, slope failure,
settlement, or soil liquefaction.
~"Shall" means a mandate; the action must be done.
f-H4t@QL_"Shoreline areas" and "shoreline jurisdiction" means all "shorelines of the
state" and "shorelands" as defined in RCW 90.58.030.
~"Shoreline Master Program" means the comprehensive use plan for a
described area and the use regulations together with maps, diagrams, charts, or
other descriptive material and text, a statement of desired goals, and standards
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor Qf;loJOno~a & Assoc.'alos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
41
Page 251 of 412
JuAe 201 SFebruary Deseml:ler 20232
developed in accordance with the policies enunciated in RCW 90.58.020. As
provided in RCW 36. 70A.480, the goals and policies of an SMP for a county or
city approved under RCW 90.58 shall be considered an element of the county or
City's Comprehensive Plan. All other portions of the SMP for a county or city
adopted under RCW 90.58, including use regulations, shall be considered a part
of the county or city's development regulations.
tl~"Shoreline modifications" means those actions that modify the physical
configuration or qualities of the shoreline area, usually through the construction
of a physical element such as a dike, breakwater, pier, weir, dredged basin, fill,
bulkhead, or other shoreline structure. They can include other actions, such as
clearing, grading, or application of chemicals.
(+-1--fB.LlQil_"Shoreline stabilization" means actions taken to address erosion impacts to
property and dwellings, businesses, or structures caused by natural processes
such as current, flood, wind, or wave action. These actions include structural
and non-structural methods. Non-structural methods include building setbacks,
relocation of the structure to be protected, groundwater management, and
planning and regulatory measures to avoid the need for structural stabilization.
~.Ll.Q1L_"Should" means that the particular action is required unless there is a
demonstrated, compelling reason, based on policy of the SMA and this SMP,
against taking the action.
~"Significant adverse environmental impacts" (as used in State
Environmental Policy Act [SEPA]) means a reasonable likelihood of more than
a moderate adverse impact on environmental quality (WAC 197-11-794).
~"Significant vegetation removal" means the removal or alteration of trees,
shrubs, and/or ground cover by clearing, grading, cutting, burning, chemical
means, or other activity that causes significant ecological impacts on functions
provided by such vegetation. The removal of invasive or noxious weeds does
not constitute significant vegetation removal. Tree pruning, not including tree
topping, where it does not affect ecological functions, does not constitute
significant vegetation removal.
(123) "8ite Assessmetrt Requifemffits" means fequifemetrts fof Critieal Afea Ref!ert.
~"Snag" means the remaining trunk of a dying, diseased, or dangerous tree
that is reduced in height and stripped of all live branches.
~Ll.Qfil_"Special flood hazard area" means an area subject to a base or 100-year
flood; areas of special flood hazard are shown on a flood hazard boundary map
or flood insurance rate map as Zone A, AO, Al-30, AE, A99, AH.
~"Species and habitats oflocal importance" means those species that may
not be endangered, threatened, or critical from a state-wide perspective, but are
of local concern due to their population status, sensitivity to habitat
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARshor QEIVOR02a & Assosiatos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
42
Page 252 of 412
June 201 liFebruaryl:lesember 20232
manipulation, or other educational, cultural, or historic attributes. These species
may be priority habitats, priority species, and those habitats and species
identified in the critical areas code as having local importance (e.g., elk).
~"Species, threatened and endangered" means those native species that are
listed by WDFW pursuant to RCW 77.12.070 as threatened (WAC 232-12-011)
or endangered (WAC 232-12-014), or that are listed as threatened or
endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (16 U.S. Code 1533).
~"Start of construction" means and includes substantial improvement and
means the date the building p=it was issued, provided the actual start of
construction, repair, reconstruction, placement, or other improvement was
within 180 days of the permit issuance date. For cumulative tracking, the p=it
may extend beyond the specified time frame to the time of permit completion.
The actual start means either the first placement of p=anent construction of a
structure on a site such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of
piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation,
or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation. Permanent
construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading, and
filling, nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways, nor does it
include excavation for a basement, footings, piers, or foundation or the erection
of temporary forms, nor does it include the installation on the property of
accessory buildings such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or
not part of the main structure. For a substantial improvement, the actual start of
construction means the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other
structural part of a building, whether or not that alteration affects the external
dimensions of the building.
~"Steep slopes" means those slopes (excluding City-approved geotechnical
engineered slopes) 40% or steeper within a vertical elevation change of at least
10 feet. A slope is defined by establishing its toe and top and is measured by
averaging the inclination over at least 10 feet of vertical relief.
~"Stream" means any portion of a channel, bed, bank, or bottom waterward
of the OHWM of waters of the state, including areas in which fish may spawn,
reside, or pass, and tributary waters with defined bed or banks, which influence
the quality of fish habitat downstream. This includes watercourses that flow on
an intermittent basis or fluctuate in level during the year and applies to the
entire bed of such watercourse whether or not the water is at peak level. This
definition does not include irrigation ditches, canals, storm water runoff devices,
or other entirely artificial watercourses, except where they exist in a natural
watercourse that has been altered by humans.
~1.l.l1L_"Structure" means a p=anent or temporary edifice or building, or any
piece of work artificially built or comprising parts joined together in some
definite manner, whether installed on, above, or below the surface of the ground
or water.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ammer QEA/One;!a & Assesia!esWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
43
Page 253 of 412
JYRO 201 liFebruary DeseFRBOF 202~
~.Ll.12l_"Substantial damage" means damage of any origin, including intentional
and unintentional demolition, sustained by a structure whereby the cost of
restoring the structure to its before-damaged condition would equal or exceed
50% of the assessed value of the structure before the damage occurred.
~"Substantial improvement" means any rehabilitation, repair,
reconstruction, addition, or other improvement of a building when the cost of
the improvement equals or exceeds 50% of the market value of the building
before start of construction of the improvement. The term includes buildings
that have incurred substantial damage or damage of any origin sustained by a
building when the cost of restoring the building to its pre-damaged condition
would equal or exceed 50% of the market value before the damage occurred.
Substantial improvement does not include any project for improvement of a
structure to correct existing violations of state or local health, sanitary, or safety
code specifications, which have been identified by the local code enforcement
official and are the minimum necessary to ensure safe living conditions or any
alteration of a historic structure, provided that the alteration will not preclude
the structure's continued designation as a historic structure.
f-841ill1L_"Substantially degrade" means to cause significant ecological impact.
~"Thinning" means the evenly spaced non-commercial removal ofup to
40% of trees and woody shrubs.
~"Topping" means the severing of main trunks or stems of vegetation at any
place above 25% of the vegetation height.
~"Transportation facilities" are those structures and developments that
provide for the movement of people, goods, and services. These include roads
and highways, railroad facilities, bridges, parking facilities, bicycle paths, trails,
and other related facilities.
(13&) "'ft:ee rem.e\•al" m.eans Ehe rem.e,•al efa tree, threugh either direst er iHdiFeet
aetiefts, ifteludmg, but ftet lim.ited te: (a) eleariftg, damagiftg er peiseftiftg
resultiftg iH aft l:Hlftealthy er dead tree; (b) reme·tal efat least halfeffue li~•e
ere•ffll; er (e) damage te rests er trunk Ehat is lil.ely te destrey Ehe tree's
struetural ifttegrity.
~"Trees" means any living woody plant characterized by one main stem or
trunk and many branches and having a diameter of four inches or more
measured 24 inches above ground level.
~l.112L_"Unavoidable" means adverse impacts that remain after all appropriate and
practicable avoidance and minimization have been achieved.
f--l-4--1-K!l1L.."Utility" means a service and/or facility that produces, transmits, carries,
stores, processes, or disposes of electrical power, gas, potable water,
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QE/!JOnoea & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
44
Page 254 of 412
June 201 liFebrua ry December 20232
stormwater, communications (including, but not limited to, telephone and
cable), sewage, oil, and the like.
~"Vegetation" means plant life growing below, at, and above the soil
surface.
(143) "VegetatieH alteratiea" meaas any eleariag, gradiag, 6l¼tiing, teppiag, lim-bing,
er pruning efyegetatien.
~"Water-dependent use" means a use or portion of a use that cannot exist in
a location that is not adjacent to the water and that is dependent on the water by
reason of the intrinsic nature of its operations.
~"Water-enjoyment use" means a recreational use or other use that
facilitates public access to the shoreline as a primary characteristic of the use or
a use that provides for recreational use or aesthetic enjoyment of the shoreline
for a substantial number of people as a general characteristic of the use, and
which through location, design, and operation ensures the public's ability to
enjoy the physical and aesthetic qualities of the shoreline. In order to qualify as
a water-enjoyment use, the use must be open to the general public and the
shoreline-oriented space within. The project must be devoted to the specific
aspects of the use that fosters shoreline enjoyment.
~"Water-oriented use" means a use that is water-dependent, water-related,
or water-enjoyment, or a combination of such uses.
(-l-4-7ill_lfil"Water quality" means the physical characteristics of water within
shoreline jurisdiction, including water quantity, hydrological, physical,
chemical, aesthetic, recreation-related, and biological characteristics. Where
used in this SMP, the term water quantity refers only to development and uses
regulated under this chapter and affecting water quantity such as impermeable
surfaces and stormwater handling practices. Water quantity, for purposes of this
chapter, does not mean the withdrawal of groundwater or diversion of surface
water pursuant to RCW 90.03.250 through 90.03.340.
~"Water-related use" means a use or portion of a use, which is not
intrinsically dependent on a waterfront location but whose economic viability is
dependent upon a waterfront location because:
(a) The use has a functional requirement for a waterfront location such as the
arrival or shipment of materials by water or the need for large quantities of
water; or
(b) The use provides a necessary service supportive of the water-dependent
uses and the proximity of the use to its customers makes its services less
expensive and/or more convenient.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AnGhOF QEl\lOnera & Asseoiales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
45
Page 255 of 412
JuRe 201 liFebruary Desemller 20232
(14 9) "Water resoHrees iR-veB.tory area" meaRs one of e2 wat0fsheds in the State of
Washington, eaeh eoffii)rising drainage areas ofa stream or streams, as
established ia ¥/AC 173 SQQ as it ei,isted on .Jaauary 1, 1997.
~.lLl.Ql_"Weir" means a structure generally built perpendicular to the shoreline for
the purpose of diverting water or trapping sediment or other moving objects
transported by water.
f-l-5-1-Kllll_"Wetlands" are areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or
groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support and that under
normal circumstances do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted
for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps,
marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial
wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland sites, including, but not limited
to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention
facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities,
or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as
a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include
those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland areas to
mitigate the conversion of wetlands.
~"Wetland categories:"
(a) Category I. Wetlands are: 1) alkali wetlands; 2) wetlands that are
identified by scientists of the Washington Natural Heritage
Program/WDNR as high quality wetlands; 3) bogs; 4) mature and
old growth forested wetlands over 1/4 acre with slow-growing trees;
5) forests with stands of aspen; and 6) wetlands that perform many
functions very well.
(b) Category II. These wetlands are those that: 1) forested wetlands in the
floodplains of rivers; 2) mature and old-growth forested wetlands over
1/4 acre with fast-growing trees; 3) vernal pools; and 4) wetlands that
perform functions well. These wetlands are difficult, though not
impossible, to replace, and provide high levels of some functions.
(c) Category III. 1) Forested wetlands in the floodplains of rivers; 2) mature
and old-growth forested wetlands over 1/4 acre with fast-growing trees;
3) vernal pools; and 4) wetlands that perform functions well. These
wetlands are difficult, though not impossible, to replace, and provide high
levels of some functions.
(d) Category IV. Category IV wetlands have the lowest level of functions and
are often heavily disturbed .. These are wetlands that could be replaced, and
in some cases improved. However, experience has shown that replacement
cannot be guaranteed in any specific case. These wetlands may provide
some important functions and also need to be protected.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.m;hor QEP/ORez;a & Assec.'atesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
46
Page 256 of 412
JuRo 2015 Februa ryDosembor 20232
Article II. Environment Designation
29.01.100 Environment Designations
(1) The City has designated shorelines pursuant to RCW 90.58 by defining them,
providing criteria for their identification, and establishing shoreline ecological
functions to be protected . Project proponents are responsible for detennining
whether a shoreline exists and is regulated pursuant to this SMP . The SMP
classifies the City 's shoreline into eight shoreline environment desiguations
consistent with the purpose and designation criteria as follows :
(2)
(a) Aquatic
(b) Natural
(c) Urban Conservancy
(d) Public Flood Protection
(e) Recreation
(f) High Intensity -Industrial
(g) High Intensity -Mixed Use
(h) Shoreline Residential
Official Shoreline Maps :
(a) Shoreline area designations are delineated on a map by reach and subreach
(SR), hereby incorporated as a part of this SMP (PMC 29.01.860), shall be
known as the Official Shoreline Map. Maps indicating the extent of
shoreline jurisdiction and shoreline designations are to be used in
conjunction with the most current scientific and technical information
available, field investigations, and on-site surveys to accurately establish
the location and extent of shoreline jurisdiction when a project is
proposed.
(3) Unmapped or Undesignated Shorelines:
(a) All areas meeting the definition of a shoreline of the state or a SSWS ,
whether mapped or not, are subject to the provisions of this SMP.
( 4) Interpretation of Environment Designation Boundaries:
(a) Whenever existing physical features are inconsistent with boundaries on
the Official Shoreline Map, the Shoreline Administrator shall interpret the
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARsf:ler QEl\/One;ra & AsseGiales White Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
47
Page 257 of 412
J1rne 2015February DeGember 20232
boundaries. Appeals of such interpretations may be filed pursuant to
PMC 29.01.810, Appeals.
(b) All shoreline areas waterward of the OHWM shall be designated Aquatic.
( c) Only one shoreline area designation shall apply to a given shoreland area.
In the case of parallel designations, designations shall be divided along an
identified linear feature. Such linear features shall be clearly noted in the
metadata associated with the Official Shoreline Map.
( d) All areas within shorelines that are not mapped and/or designated are
automatically assigned an Urban Conservancy designation.
(e) Environment designations for shorelines within UGA will be effective
immediately upon annexation of the area into the City limits.
29.01.110 Aquatic
(I) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the Aquatic shoreline designation is to protect, restore, and
manage the unique characteristics and resources of the areas waterward of
theOHWM.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) An Aquatic shoreline designation is assigned to lands and waters
waterward of the OHWM
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(i) New over-water structures should be allowed only for
water-dependent uses, public access, recreation, or ecological
restoration.
(ii) Shoreline uses and modifications should be designed and managed
to prevent degradation of water quality and natural hydrographic
conditions.
(iii) In-water uses should be allowed where impacts can be mitigated to
ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. Permitted
in-water uses must be managed to avoid impacts to shoreline
ecological functions. Unavoidable impacts must be minimized and
mitigated.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARo/:Jor QEl'JORe:zca & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
48
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 258 of 412
29.01.120
J1me :i!016 FebruaryDecember 2023:i!
(iv) On navigable waters or their beds, all uses and developments
should be located and designed to:
(A) Minimize interference with surface navigation;
(B) Consider impacts to public views; and
(C) Allow for the safe, unobstructed passage offish and
wildlife, particularly species dependent on migration .
(b) Multiple or shared use of over-water and water-access facilities should be
encouraged to reduce the impacts of shoreline development and increase
effective use of water resources.
( c) Structures and activities permitted should be related in size, form, design,
and intensity of use to those permitted in the immediately adjacent upland
area. The size of new over-water structures should be limited to the
minimum necessary to support the structure's intended use.
(d) Natural light should be allowed to penetrate to the extent necessary to
support fisheries and nearshore aquatic habitat unless other illumination is
required by state or federal agencies .
(e) Shoreline uses, development, activities, and modifications in the Aquatic
shoreline designation requiring use of adjacent landside property should
be in a shoreline designation that allows that use, development, activity, or
modification.
Natural
(All islands, Subreach [SR] Id)
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the Natural shoreline designation is to protect those
shoreline areas that are relatively free of human influence or that include
intact or minimally degraded shoreline ecological functions less tolerant of
human use . These systems require that only very low-intensity uses be
allowed in order to maintain the ecological functions and ecosystem-wide
processes. Consistent with the policies of the designation, restoration of
degraded shorelines within this environment is appropriate.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) The following criteria should be considered in assigning a Natural
environment designation:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ansher Q&"/One:za & AsseGialesWhite Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
49
Page 259 of 412
June 2015 FebruaryDesemlaer 20232
(i) The shoreline ecological functions are substantially intact and have ◄
a high opportunity for preservation and low opportunity for
restoration;
(ii) The shoreline is generally in public or conservancy ownership or
under covenant, easement, or a conservation tax program;
(iii) The shoreline contains little or no development or is planned for
development that would have minimal adverse impacts to
ecological functions or risk to human safety;
(iv) The shoreline has high potential for low-impact, passive, or public
recreation; and
(v) The shoreline is considered to represent ecosystems and geologic
types that have high scientific and educational value.
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to other applicable policies and regulations, the following
management policies shall apply:
(i) Any use beyond existing uses that would substantially degrade
shoreline ecological functions or natural character of the shoreline
area should not be allowed;
( ii) Scientific, historic, cultural, educational research, and low-impact,
passive recreational uses are allowed in addition to existing uses,
while meeting no net loss of ecological function requirements;
(iii) Single-family residential development may be allowed as a
conditional use if the density and intensity of such use is limited as
necessary to protect ecological functions and is consistent with the
purpose of the environment;
(iv) Vegetation should remain undisturbed except for removal of
noxious vegetation and invasive species through ongoing
management activities or as part of a development proposal.
Proposed subdivision or lot line adjustments, new development, or
significant vegetation removal that would reduce the capability of
vegetation to perform normal ecological functions should not be
allowed;
(v) Uses that would deplete physical or biological resources or impair
views to or from the shoreline over time should be prohibited;
(vi) Only physical alterations that serve to support an existing use,
protect a significant or unique physical, biological, or visual
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QEPJOneZca & AssocialosWbite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
50
[ Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 260 of 412
29.01.130
JuRe 201 li February December 20232
shoreline feature that might otherwise be degraded or destroyed, or
those alterations that are the minimum necessary to support a
permitted use should be allowed; and
( vii) Only the following types of signs should be considered for location
in the shorelines: interpretive; directional ; navigational; regulatory;
and public.
Urban Conservancy
(Open-space areas located water ward of the parcel boundaries in the
Columbia River Reach 1, Subreaches (SR) 3a (north portion of Chiawana Park),
3b, 5c (non-levee portion of the wetland near Riverview Park), 6c (portion water
ward of the trail), Reach 7 (Sacajawea Park excluding the boat launch and
recreation area), and SR Sa.)
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the Urban Conservancy environment is to protect and
restore ecological functions of open space, floodplain , and other sensitive
lands where they exist in urban and developed settings, while allowing a
variety of compatible uses
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) The following criteria are used to consider an Urban Conservancy
environment designation:
(i) The shoreline contains open space, floodplain, or other sensitive
areas that should not be more intensively developed;
(ii) The shoreline has riparian vegetation with high to moderate
ecological functions;
(iii) The shoreline has potential for development that is compatible
with ecological restoration; or
(iv) The shoreline is not generally suitable for water-dependent uses,
however, has moderate to high potential for public, water-related,
or water-enjoyment uses where ecological functions can be
maintained or restored.
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply :
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ancher QENOne2a & Asseciates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
51
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 261 of 412
29.01.140
(i)
June 2016 February 0eGember 20232
Shoreline uses that preserve the natural character of the area or
promote preservation of open space, floodplain, or sensitive lands
either directly or during the long term should be the primary
allowed uses. Uses that result in restoration of ecological functions
should be allowed if the use is otherwise compatible with the
purpose of the environment and the setting.
(ii) Encourage regulations for shoreline stabilization measures,
vegetation conservation, water quality, and shoreline modifications
to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions;
(iii) Public access and public recreation uses should be allowed
whenever feasible and significant ecological impacts can be
mitigated; or
(iv) Water-oriented uses should be given priority over
non-water-oriented uses. For shoreline areas adjacent to
commercially navigable waters, water-dependent uses should be
given priority.
Public Flood Protection
(Leveed areas along the Columbia River, where limited ecological function and
future development potential exists, and the areas are dedicated for public
recreation as part of the regional trail system.)
(I) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the Public Flood Protection environment designation is to
provide flood protection features while protecting shoreline ecological
functions with limitations imposed by the flood protection features, and
provide recreational opportunities. In addition to existing levees, examples
of uses that are appropriate in a Public Flood Protection shoreline
designation include public access and recreation uses consistent with the
protection of public safety and property by the flood protection features.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) The following criteria are used to consider a Public Flood Protection
environment designation:
(i) The shoreline has low to moderate ecological function with low to •
moderate opportunity for preservation or restoration;
(ii) The shoreline is owned and maintained by public agencies;
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARsher Qli./VORe;!a & l'.sses.'ates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
52
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 262 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry Desemller 2023~
(iii) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is related
to flood protection, public utility, infrastructure, and low-intensity
recreation, facility rehabilitation, or upgrade modifications;
(iv) The shoreline has limited scientific or educational value or unique
historic or cultural resources values; or
(v) The shoreline has low to moderate potential for public,
water-oriented recreation where ecological functions can be
maintained or restored.
(3) Management Policies:
29.01.150
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(i) In regulating uses in the Public Flood Protection environment, first ◄
priority should be given to flood protection and water-dependent
public-facility uses. Second priority should be given to
water-related and water-enjoyment uses that are not in conflict
with the flood protection uses. Non-water-oriented uses are
allowed as part of the operational needs.
(ii) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions as a result ofredevelopment, facility
upgrades, and new development. Where applicable, development
shall include environmental enhancement of the shoreline in
accordance with USACE McNary Pool Management Plan and the
City's SMP Restoration Plan.
(iii) Existing visual and physical public access opportunities shall be
maintained and enhanced where feasible and appropriate, as
consistent with PMC 29.01.260, Public Access.
(iv) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as
appropriate landscape features, screening, and maintenance of
natural vegetative buffers.
Recreation
(Chiawana, Wade, Riverview, Schlagel, and Sacajawea parks, marina, boat launch areas)
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the Recreation environment designation is to provide for
water-oriented recreational uses with some commercial uses to support
recreational uses while protecting existing ecological functions,
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Am,lwr Q~NOneza & Asseciales White Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
53
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 263 of 412
Juno 201 li February Desomber 20232
conserving existing natural resources, and restoring ecological functions in
areas that have been previously degraded.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) The following criteria are used to consider a Recreation environment
designation:
(i) The shoreline has low to moderate ecological function with low to •
moderate opportunity for preservation and restoration.
(ii) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is
recreation-related with potential for additional recreation and
recreation-related commerce or is suitable and planned for
water-oriented uses.
(iii) The shoreline has existing recreation uses or moderate to high
potential for public and private water-oriented recreation where
ecological functions can be maintained or enhanced.
(iv) The shoreline has limited scientific or educational value or unique
historic or cultural resources values.
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(i) In regulating uses in the Recreation environment, first priority
should be given to water-dependent recreational uses. Second
priority should be given to water-related and water-enjoyment
recreational uses. Non-water-oriented uses should not be allowed,
except as part of mixed-use developments with a recreation focus.
(ii) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions as a result of new development. Consistent
with the City's SMP Restoration Plan, new development may be
required, as applicable, to include restoration of shoreline functions
as part of project proposals.
(iii) Where feasible, visual and physical public access should be
required as provided for in PMC 29.01.260, Public Access.
Recreational objectives should be enhanced by combining physical
and visual public access opportunities with other recreational
opportunities where feasible.
(iv) Water-oriented commercial uses should be allowed.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.nGRor Qf£."J0nez;a & l'.sses.'alesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
54
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 264 of 412
29.01.160
J1me 201 SFebruary Cesember 20232
(v) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as
sign-control regulations, appropriate development siting,
screening, and architectural standards, and maintenance of natural
vegetative buffers.
High Intensity -Industrial
(Areas landward of the levee in SR 5b, Port of Pasco, a portion of Osprey Point,
industrial areas on Columbia River SR 6c, and the Snake River SR 8b)
(1) Purpose:
( a) The purpose of the High Intensity -Industrial environment designation is
to provide for public and private commercial and industrial uses that need
a shoreline location for operation and are associated with water-oriented
commerce and industry. Examples of uses that are appropriate in a
High Intensity -Industrial shoreline environment include water-oriented
commercial uses, water-supply diversion, transportation, navigation uses,
barge and conveyance facilities, and similar uses. This environment may
also provide for some recreation, while protecting existing ecological
functions and restoring ecological functions in areas that have been
previously degraded.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) Assign a High Intensity-Industrial environment designation to shoreline
areas where:
(i) The shoreline has low to moderate ecological function with low to •
moderate opportunity for preservation or restoration.
(ii) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is related
to public utility, infrastructure, industry, or commerce with
potential for additional related development, facility rehabilitation,
or upgrade modifications.
(iii) Existing landward industrial development exists and has potential
for future growth and development.
(iv) The operation of such uses depend on proximity to water,
including high-intensity uses related to industrial production,
conveyance, transportation, or navigation.
(v) The shoreline has limited scientific or educational value or unique
historic or cultural resources values.
(3) Management Policies:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ansher QEA'Oneza & Aooeoiateo White Bluffs Consultin y
Draft
55
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 265 of 412
29.01.170
JuRe 201 li February DeGember 2023.!
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(i) In regulating uses in the High Intensity -Industrial environment, •
first priority should be given to water-dependent commercial and
industrial uses. Second priority should be given to water-related
and water-enjoyment uses that are not in conflict with the
commercial and industrial uses. Non-water-oriented uses are
allowed as part of mixed uses to support the water-oriented uses.
(ii) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions as a result ofredevelopment, facility
upgrades, and new development. Where applicable, development
shall include environmental cleanup and restoration of the
shoreline to comply in accordance with any relevant state and
federal law.
(iii) Where feasible and appropriate, visual and physical public access
provisions may be included as consistent with PMC 29.01 .260,
Public Access.
(iv) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as
appropriate development siting, screening, and maintenance of
natural vegetative buffers.
High Intensity -Mixed Use
(Port of Pasco Marine Terminal SR 6a and western halfofOsprey Point)
(1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the High Intensity-Mixed Use environment designation
is to provide for water-oriented commercial and retail uses along with
residential uses. Examples of uses that are appropriate in a
High Intensity-Mixed Use shoreline environment include water-oriented
commercial office and retail, residential, transportation, public access, and
similar uses. This environment may also provide for some recreation,
while protecting existing ecological functions and restoring ecological
functions in areas that have been previously degraded.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) Assign a High Intensity-Mixed Use environment designation to shoreline
areas where:
(i) The shoreline has low to moderate ecological function with low to •
moderate opportunity for preservation or restoration.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
56 ARGRer QEl\/0RG2Ea & Assosiat-OsWhite Bluffs Consulting
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 266 of 412
J1me 201 &FebruaryDesember 20232
(ii) The shoreline is highly developed, and most development is related
to public utility, infrastructure, or commerce with potential for
additional related development, facility rehabilitation, or upgrade
modifications.
(iii) Existing landward development exists and has potential for future
growth and development.
(iv) The operation of such uses depends on proximity to water,
including high-intensity uses related to commerce, transportation,
or navigation.
(v) The shoreline has limited to no scientific, educational, unique
historic, or cultural resources values.
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the following management policies shall apply:
(i) Development in the High Intensity-Mixed-Use Environment
should be managed so it enhances and maintains the shorelines for
a variety of urban uses.
(ii) In regulating uses in the High Intensity -Mixed Use environment,
first priority should be given to water-dependent commercial uses.
Second priority should be given to water-related and
water-enjoyment uses that are not in conflict with the commercial
uses. Non-water-oriented uses are allowed as part of mixed uses to
support the water-oriented uses. Residential uses should be
allowed on the upper floors of developments as part of mixed uses
to support the water-oriented uses.
(iii) Policies and regulations shall ensure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions as a result of redevelopment, facility
upgrades, and new development. Where applicable, development
shall include environmental cleanup and restoration of the
shoreline to comply in accordance with any relevant state and
federal law.
(iv) Where feasible and appropriate, visual and physical public access
provisions may be included as consistent with PMC 29.01 .260,
Public Access.
(v) Aesthetic objectives should be implemented by means such as
appropriate development siting, building design, screening, and
maintenance of natural vegetative buffers.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARe/Jer QE./VOReza & /\ssesiates White Bluffs Consultin11
Draft
57
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 267 of 412
29.01.180
June 201 li Februarv Desember 20232
Shoreline Residential
(Residential areas along the Columbia River in Reaches 1 and 2, SRs 4a and 4b,
and portions of SRs Sb and 6b)
( 1) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of the Shoreline Residential environment designation is to
accommodate primarily residential development and appurtenant
structures, but also a11ow other types of development consistent with this
section. An additional purpose is to provide appropriate public access and
recreational uses.
(2) Designation Criteria:
(a) Assign a Shoreline Residential environment designation to shoreline areas
where:
(i) The shoreline has low to moderate ecological function with low to ◄
moderate opportunity for restoration.
(ii) The shoreline contains mostly residential development at urban
densities or in clusters in more rural settings.
(iii) The shoreline has low to moderate potential for low-impact,
passive, or active water-oriented recreation where ecological
functions can be restored.
(3) Management Policies:
(a) In addition to the other applicable policies and regulations of this SMP,
the fo11owing management policies shaJI apply:
(i) Encourage regulations that ensure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions as a result of new development such as
limiting lot coverage, providing adequate setbacks from the
shoreline, promoting vegetation conservation, reducing the need
for shoreline stabilization, and maintaining or improving water
quality.
(ii) The scale and density of new uses and development should be
compatible with the existing residential character of the area.
(iii) Public access and joint (rather than individual) use of recreational
facilities should be promoted.
(iv) Access, utilities, and public services to serve proposed
development within shorelines should be constructed outside
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
P.Rc/:lor QEIVORO.ea &AssoGialosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
58
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 268 of 412
June 201&Februa ry Qesember 2023~
shorelines to the extent feasible and be the minimum necessary to
adequately serve existing needs and planned future development.
(v) Public or private outdoor recreation facilities should be provided
with proposals for subdivision development and encouraged with
all shoreline development, if compatible with the character of the
area. Priority should be given first to water-dependent and then to
water-enjoyment recreation facilities.
(vi) Commercial development should be limited to water-oriented uses.
Non-water-oriented commercial uses should only be allowed as
part of mixed-used developments.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARchor QENOne;?;a & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
59
Page 269 of 412
J1me 2015February Desemher 20232
Article III. General Regulations
29.01.200 Shoreline Use and Modification
(I) Regulations:
(a) PMC Table 29.01 .200 (2) indicates which shoreline activities, uses,
developments, and modifications may be allowed or are prohibited in
shoreline jurisdiction within each shoreline environment designation.
Activities, uses, developments, and modifications are classified as follows:
(i) "Permitted Uses" require a Shoreline Substantial Development
Permit or a Shoreline Exemption.
(ii) "Conditional Uses" require a Shoreline Special Use Permit per
PMC 29.01.750.
(iii) "Prohibited" activities, uses, developments, and modifications are
not allowed and cannot be permitted through a Variance or
Shoreline Special Use Permit.
(iv) General Regulations (PMC 29.01, Article III) and Shoreline
Modification and Uses Regulations (PMC 29.01, Article IV) shall
be considered for additional limitations.
(b) All uses shall comply with the written provisions and regulations in this
SMP and the shoreline use and modification matrix in PMC 29.01 .200 (2).
Where there is a conflict between the chart and the written provisions in
this SMP, the written provisions shall control.
(2) General:
(a) Accessory uses shall be subject to the same shoreline permit process as
their primary use.
(b) Authorized uses and modifications shall be allowed only in shoreline
jurisdictions where the underlying zoning allows for it and subject to the
policies and regulations of this SMP.
(c) A use is considered unclassified when it is not listed in
Table 29.01.200 (2) or in the Shoreline Modification and Uses Regulations
(PMC 29.01, Article IV). Any proposed unclassified use may be
authorized as a conditional use provided that the applicant can
demonstrate consistency with the requirements of this SMP.
( d) If any part of a proposed activity, use, modification, or development is not
eligible for exemption per PMC 18.20.770 (Exemptions from Shoreline
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARchor Qel'.iORoz,a & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
60
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 270 of 412
June 2015 FebruaryDesemller 2023~
Substantial Development Permits), then a Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit or Shoreline Special Use Permit shall be required for
the entire proposed development project.
(e) When a specific use or modification extends into the Aquatic environment
and an abutting upland environment without clear separation ( e.g., private
moorage facility or shoreline stabilization), the most restrictive permit
process shall apply to that use or modification.
(f) Shoreline and critical areas buffers found in PMC 29.01, Article V, apply
to all uses and modifications unless stated otherwise in the regulations.
(g) None of the allowed uses shall be conducted in the floodway in any
environment designation, except as allowed by PMC 29.01 .550, Flood
Hazard Areas.
(h) Administrative interpretation of these regulations shall be done according
to PMC 29.01.710 (2).
(3) Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix:
Table 29.01.200 (2): Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix for City of Pasco
A= Allowed with Substantial Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA= Not Applicable
Use/Modification
Resource Uses
Agriculture
Mining
Boating Facilities
Boat launch (motorized boats)
Boat launch (non-motorized boats -canoe/kayak)
Marina
Docks, Piers, Mooring Facilities
Private and shared moorage
Public moorage
Covered moorage
°E .a .. z
~
C
~
ill
C
0
I.I
C .. .a
::i
Jt )C A1
A C C
A C A
A C
A
A
C
0
tl
QI
~
Q.
"Cl
0
0
ii: -~ :E ::s
Q.
A
A
C
A
A
C
:8 ..
~ u
QI a:
A
A
A
A
A
C
C C
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
C
C
C
A
C
A
C
lC
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anshor Qel\/Ono~ & Assosiatos White Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
61
Page 271 of 412
A = Allowed with Substantial Development Permit
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special Use Permit
X = Prohibited
NA= Not Applicable
u °E +:: ra ::, ::, ..
Cl' ..
Use/Modification C( z
Commercial Development
Water-dependent A X
Water-related, water-enjoyment C X
Non-water-oriented C' X
Dredging Activities
Dredging ~ NA
Dredge material disposal C X
Dredging and disposal as part of ecological
restoration/enhancement
A A
Fill and Excavation
Fill Waterward of OHWM and in floodways3 C C
Other upland fill NA C
Excavation NA C4
Industrial Uses
Water-dependent As X
Water-related, water-enjoyment As X
Non-water-oriented X X
In-water Modifications
Breakwater C X
Groins and weirs C X
In-stream structures6 A C4
Recreational Development
Water-dependent A A'
Water-related, water-enjoyment {trails, accessory C c1
buildings)
'----
Non-water-oriented X X
Residential Development X C
Research and Monitoring
Water-dependent A A
Water-related, water-enjoyment A A
Non-water-oriented A A
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARshor QE,11/0Re,ea & AssosialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
JuRe 201SFebrua December 20232
C
0 "ii ~ .,
C e ..
i': Q. .,
"Cl .,
C 0 C
0 0 0 u ii: +:: .. C .!:! .. :ii ~ -e u ::, .,
:> Q. a:
A A A
C C A
C' C' A2
NA NA NA
C C C
A A I A
C C C
A A A
C A A
X C X
X C X
X c2 X
C C C
C C C
c• A•·• A3
A' A A
A7 A A -c> C' A2
A X C
A A A
A A I A
A A A
I
?; ·;;;
C -! ,!!! C ._
-t; .J:. ::, -~ -g :c -
A
A
A2
NA
C
A
C
A
A
A
A
A2
C
C
A
A
A
A2
X
A
A
A
"Cl ., ..
~
I
?;
·;;;
C ., :s
:§ I
:c :>
A
A
A2
NA
C
A
C
A
A
A
A
A2
C
C
C
A
A
A:
A'
A
A
A
.;
+:: C .,
"Cl ·;;; .,
a: .,
.5
f!
0
.J:.
"'
A
C
X
NA
C
A
C
A
A
X
X
~
C
C
C
A
A
A2
A
A
A
A
Draft
62
:
Page 272 of 412
J1me 201 li Februa ryDeGemller 20232
C "Cl 0
A= Allowed with Substantial Development Permit B cu ! ~ ,c
C = Allowed with Shoreline Special Use Permit cu ~ C C e cu ra I I C: "Cl
X = Prohibited Cl. .?" .?" ·;;; cu "Cl cu "' ·;;; ·;;; NA= Not Applicable C 0 C
C -C
c,:
0 0 ~ cu ra cu cu
~ iii I.I ii: ... ·-... .5 '" C ._ .5
'" s C .!::! l!! -t: "!! ra :i2 .c ::, !a~ ::, ... -e u .e9 ~ 0 er '" ::, cu .c
Use/Modification <( z ::::) Cl. c,: :r: -:r:::::) "'
Shoreline Habitat and Natural Systems A A A A A A A A
Enhancement Projects
Shoreline Stabilization and Flood Control
Flood Control
Modification of existing flood control facilities ' I
I
(Dams, Dikes and Levees), including replacement A A A A I A A A A
landward of existing location
New flood control facilities (Dams, Dikes and C c• C C C A A C
Levees)
Shoreline Stabilization -New
Hard C l( C C I C A A C
Soft A A A A A A A A
Shoreline Stabilization -Replacement• A A A A A A A A
Transportation
Highways, arterials, railroads (parallel to OHWM) C )( A A A A A A
Secondary/public access roads (parallel to OHWM) X X A A i A A A A
Roads perpendicular to the OHWM It C A A A A A A
Bridges (perpendicular to shoreline) C C C A A A A C
Existing bridges, trails, roads, and parking facilities: A A A A A A A A
improvement or expansion
New parking, primary X X Aoo Al' A1t' Al~ ~
New parking, accessory X Takes permit types of primary use
Utilities
Above-ground and underground utilities (parallel and C C A A I A A I A A
across shoreline)
Notes:
1. Allowed when agricultural uses are passive, such as livestock grazing, harvesting of non-cultivated crops, or
small-scale farms, or when ecological functions are degraded to the point where the land is functionally equivalent
to cultivated land.
2. New uses are allowed as part of mixed use or according to PMC 29.01.340(2) for commercial development,
PMC 29.01.370(2) for industrial development, or as part of an existing use according to Article VI, Existing Uses,
Structures and Lots.
3. Fill and excavation waterward of the OHWM, to support ecological restoration is allowed with a Substantial
Development Permit.
4. Habitat restoration and/or fish habitat enhance purposes only.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AnGhor QEl•/Onez,a & Assooiales White Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
63
Page 273 of 412
JIJRO 2015 Februa ry Deeember 20232
5. Allowed as part of upland industrial water-dependent or water-related uses.
6. Construction, practices, and maintenance of facilities necessary for flood protections or Columbia Basin Project
operations and associated water-dependent uses to access, pump, and convey water for project purposes to public
agencies or private water users and as consistent with permit exemptions described in PMC 29.01.770.
7. Low intensity only.
8. Only when no other alternatives are available.
9. Exempt for protective bulkhead common to single-family residences according to PMC 29.01.770 (4) and when
consistent with PMC 29.01.440 (5) and (6).
10. Not allowed within 50 feet of edge of riparian vegetation corridor.
OHWM = ordinary high water mark
29.01.210 Development Standards
(1) Regulations:
(a) To preserve the existing and planned character of the shoreline consistent
with the purposes of the shoreline environment designations, development
standards are provided in the table below. These standards apply to all
uses and modifications unless otherwise indicated. In addition, shoreline
developments shall comply with all other dimensional requirements of the
PMC.
(b) When a development or use is proposed that does not comply with the
dimensional performance standards of this SMP, not otherwise allowed by
administrative reduction or administrative modification, such development
or use can only be authorized by approval of a Shoreline Variance Permit.
(c) No permit shall be issued for any new or expanded building or structure of
more than 3 5 feet above average grade level on shorelines of the state that
will obstruct the view of a substantial number of residences on areas
adjoining such shorelines, except for the High Intensity environment
designations areas, or where the SMP does not prohibit the same, and then
only when overriding considerations of the public interest will be served.
(2) Shoreline Development Standards Matrix:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARchor QE/VORoZ'a & Assoo.'alosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
64
Page 274 of 412
June 2015 Februa ryDecember 202~
Table 29.01.210 (2): Shoreline Development Standards Matrix for City of Pasco
C "Cl 0 "tl GI ! a-" C i ~ C
ra I I GI
"Cl 2: 0. .?" .?" ·;:;;
GI "Cl GI "' ·;:;; ·;:;; a:: C 0 C C C -0 0 :8 ~ GI ra GI
~ °E u ii: ~.:: .5
C .!::! ra .5 -t: al ra ~ ra :0 e "&, "' .s:; ::, ... ::, -e u .. "Cl 0 er .. ::, "' ·-"' •-C .r. Use/Modification ct z ::, 0. a:: :c ::, :c -"'
Building height1 15 N/A 35 35 35 45 No
limit
35
Building line setback in feet NA 10-15
Impervious surface cover-NA 5% 20% 10% 20% 50% 100% 50%
maximum (%)2
Conserve
Riparian buffer width NA entire 75 50 50 5 50 50
in feet2• 3• 4
area
20 feet or as required by Americans with Disabilities
Trail width in feet NA NA Act regulations. Trails on private properties and not
open for public use shall be up to 5-feet-wide.
Notes:
1. According to 29.01.210 (l)(c)
2. Accompanied by stormwater management measures/facilities, wetland protections and other protections as
applicable
3. Measured from the OHWM or top of bank as applicable.
4. Except where roadway, paved trail , or parking area or other development that has eliminated or constrained
ecological functions encroaches and then to the waterward edge of the facility maintenance area, as applicable
NA= not applicable
29.01.220 Archaeological and Historic Resources
1 l l The City will coordinate with tribal . state and federal agencies that maintain
inventories of known si !!nificant historic . cultural and archaeolo !!ical sites . and
work with these a gencies in the permit review process in com phing with state
and federal rel!ulations and laws to orotect sites and areas that have historic,
cultural. and archaeolo gical values. Existin g rx•licies also reinforce this action .
as written. so no additional chan ges pla1111ed.
t-14i1Lfu all developments, whenever an archaeological area or historic site is
discovered by a development in the shoreline area, the developer shall comply
with applicable state and federal laws and regulations.
~Developers and property owners shall stop work immediately and notify the
local government , the office of archaeology and historic preservation, and
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ansher QEI\/Oneza & AssesiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
65
Page 275 of 412
JYRO 2015 Februa rv Desember 20232
affected Indian tribes if archaeological resources are uncovered during
excavation.
~Pennits issued in areas documented to contain archaeological resources shall
require a site inspection or evaluation by a professional archaeologist in
coordination with affected Indian tribes.
29.01.230 Environmental Protection
(1) All project proposals, including those for which a Shoreline Substantial
Development Pennit is not required, shall comply with RCW 43 .21 C, the
Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).
(2) Applicants shall apply the following mitigation sequencing steps in order of
priority to avoid or minimize significant adverse effects and significant
ecological impacts (with (a) being top priority):
(a) Avoid the adverse impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts
of an action;
(b) Minimize adverse impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the
action and its implementation by using appropriate technology or by
taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts;
( c) Rectify the adverse impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the
affected environment to the conditions existing at the time of the initiation
of the project;
( d) Reduce or eliminate the adverse impact over time by preservation and
maintenance operations;
(e) Compensate for the adverse impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing
substitute resources or environments; and
(f) Monitor the adverse impact and the compensation projects and taking
appropriate corrective measures.
(3) Projects that cause significant adverse environmental impacts, as defined in
WAC 197-11-794 and PMC 29.01.080, Definitions, are not allowed unless
mitigated according to PMC 29.01 .230 (2), above, to avoid reduction or damage
to ecosystem-wide processes and ecological functions. As part of this analysis,
the applicant shall evaluate whether the project may adversely affect existing
hydro logic connections between streams and wetlands and either modify the
project or mitigate any impacts as needed.
( 4) When compensatory measures are appropriate pursuant to the mitigation
priority sequence above, preferential consideration shall be given to measures
that replace the adversely impacted functions directly and in the immediate
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARchor QEIVORozea & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
66
Page 276 of 412
J11Re 2015 FebruaryDeGember 20232
vicinity of the adverse impact. However, alternative compensatory mitigation
may be authorized within the affected drainage area or watershed that addresses
limiting factors or identified critical needs for shoreline resource conservation
based on watershed or resource management plans, including the Shoreline
Restoration Plan, applicable to the area of adverse impact. Authorization of
compensatory mitigation measures may require appropriate safeguards, terms,
or conditions as necessary to ensure no net loss of ecological functions.
29.01.240 Shoreline Vegetation Conservation
(1) Vegetation conservation standards shall not apply retroactively to existing uses
and developments . Vegetation associated with existing structures, uses, and
developments may be maintained within shoreline jurisdiction as stipulated in
the approval documents for the development.
(2) Regulations specifying establishment and management of shoreline buffers are
located in the PMC 29.01, Article V, Critical Areas . Vegetation within shoreline
buffers, other stream buffers, and wetlands and wetland buffers shall be
managed consistent with the PMC 29.01, Article V.
(3) Vegetation outside of shoreline buffers, other stream buffers, and wetlands and
wetland buffers and within shoreline jurisdiction shall be managed according to
this PMC 29.01 .230, Environmental Protection, and any other regulations
specific to vegetation management contained in other sections of this SMP.
(4) Vegetation clearing outside of wetlands and wetland and stream buffers shall be
limited to the minimum necessary to accommodate approved shoreline
development that is consistent with all other provisions of this SMP. Mitigation
sequencing per PMC 29.01.230, Environmental Protection, shall be applied so
the design and location of the structure or development minimizes native
vegetation removal.
(5) Removal of noxious weeds and/or invasive species shall be incorporated in
management and mitigation plans, as necessary, to facilitate establishment of a
stable community of native plants .
29.01.250 Water Quality, Storm water, and Nonpoint Pollution
(1) The location, design, construction, and management of all shoreline uses and
activities shall protect the quality and quantity of surface and groundwater
adjacent to the site .
(2) When applicable, all shoreline development should comply with the
requirements of the latest version of Ecology's Stonnwater Management
Manual for Eastern Washington.
(3) Best management practices (BMPs) for control of erosion and sedimentation
shall be implemented for all shoreline development .
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGher Q~N-ORei!a & AsseGiales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
67
Page 277 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry Desemeer 2023a
( 4) Potentially harmful materials, including, but not limited to, oil, chemicals, tires,
or hazardous materials, shall not be allowed to enter any body of water or
wetland, or to be discharged onto the land. Potentially harmful materials shall
be maintained in safe and leak-proof containers.
(5) Within 25 feet of a waterbody, herbicides, fungicides, fertilizers, and pesticides
shall be applied in strict conformance to the manufacturer's recommendations
and in accordance with relevant state and federal laws. Further, pesticides
subject to the final ruling in Washington Toxics Coalition, et al., v. EPA shall
not be applied within 60 feet for ground applications or within 300 feet for
aerial applications of the subject waterbodies and shall be applied by a qualified
professional in accordance with state and federal law.
(6) New development shall provide storm water management facilities designed,
constructed, and maintained in accordance with the latest version of the
Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington, including
the use ofBMPs. Additionally, new development shall implement low-impact
development techniques where feasible and necessary to fully implement the
core elements of the Surface Water Design Manual.
(7) For development activities with the potential for adverse impacts on water
quality or quantity in a stream or Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area,
a Critical Area Report as prescribed in the PMC 29.01, Article V, Critical
Areas, shall be prepared. Such reports should discuss the project's potential to
exacerbate water quality parameters, which are impaired, and for which total
maximum daily loads for that pollutant have been established, and prescribe any
necessary mitigation and monitoring.
(8) All materials that may come in contact with water shall be constructed of
materials, such as untreated wood, concrete, and approved plastic composites or
steel, that will not adversely affect water quality or aquatic plants or animals.
Materials used for decking or other structural components shall be approved by
applicable state agencies for contact with water to avoid discharge of pollutants
from wave or boat wake splash, rain, or runoff. Wood treated with creosote,
copper chromium arsenic, or pentachlorophenol is prohibited in shoreline
waterbodies.
29.01.260 Public Access
(1) Applicants required to provide shoreline public access shall provide physical or
visual access, consistent with the City of Pasco's Public Access Plan and other
agencies' management plans when applicable, unless specifically exempted in
this section. Examples of physical and visual access are listed below:
(a) Visual Access. Visual public access may consist of view corridors,
viewpoints, or other means of visual approach to public waters.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.RGRer Qel'.l-0Re2!a & l'.SSOGiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
68
Page 278 of 412
June :l916 FebruaryDesember 202~
(b) Physical Access. Physical public access may consist of a dedication of
land or easement and a physical improvement in the fonn of a walkway,
trail, bikeway, park, boat or canoe and kayak launching ramp, dock area,
view platform, or other area serving as a means of physical approach to
public waters.
(2) Except as provided in PMC 29.01.260 (3) below, new uses shall provide for
safe and convenient public access to and along the shoreline where any of the
following conditions are present:
(a) The development is proposed by a public entity or on public lands;
(b) The nature of the proposed use, activity, or development will likely result
in an increased demand for public access to the shoreline;
(c) The proposed use, activity, or development is not a water-oriented or other
preferred shoreline use, activity, or development under the SMA such as a
non-water-oriented commercial or recreational use;
(d) The proposed use, activity, or development may block or discourage the
use of customary and established public access paths, walkways, trails, or
corridors;
(e) The proposed use, activity, or development will interfere with the public
use, activity, and enjoyment of shoreline areas or waterbodies subject to
the public trust doctrine;
(f) The proposed use, activity, or development includes key areas for public
access recommended in the City's Public Access Plan and/or
Shoreline Restoration Plan; or
(g) The proposed activity is a publicly financed shoreline erosion-control
measure (when feasible).
(3) An applicant shall not be required to provide public access where one or more
of the following conditions apply, provided such exceptions shall not be used to
prevent implementing the City's Public Access Plan and other agencies '
management plans. In determining the infeasibility, undesirability, or
incompatibility of public access in a given situation, the City shall consider
alternative methods of providing public access, such as off-site improvements,
viewing platfom1s, separation of uses through site planning and design, and
restricting hours of public access:
(a) Proposed use, activity, or development only involves the construction of
four or fewer single-family or multi-family dwellings;
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARs/wr QficNOReza & A66eeiale6 White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
69
Page 279 of 412
J1rne :!01 liFebruaryDeseml3er 20232
(b) Proposed use is within an area where public access is not proposed in the
Public Access Plan, and the use will not increase public access demand or
reduce public access;
( c) Proposed use is an agricultural activity;
( d) The nature of the use, activity, or development or the characteristics of the
site make public access requirements inappropriate due to health, safety
(including consistency with Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design [CPTED] principles, where applicable), or environmental hazards;
the proponent shall carry the burden of demonstrating by substantial
evidence the existence of unavoidable or unmitigable threats or hazards to
public health, safety, or the environment that would be created or
exacerbated by public access upon the site;
(e) An existing, new, or expanded road or utility crossing through shoreline
jurisdiction shall not create the need for public access if the development
being accessed or served by the road or utility is located outside of
shoreline jurisdiction;
(f) The proposed use, activity, or development has security requirements that
are not feasible to address through the application of alternative design
features for public access such as off-site improvements, viewing
platforms, and separation of uses through site planning and design;
(g) The economic cost of providing for public access at the site is
unreasonably disproportionate to the total long-term economic value of the
proposed use, activity, or development;
(h) Safe and convenient public access already exists in the general vicinity,
and/or the Public Access Plan shows adequate public access at the
property;
(i) Public access has reasonable potential to threaten or harm the natural
functions and native characteristics of the shoreline and/or is deemed
detrimental to threatened or endangered species under the
Endangered Species Act; and
(j) The site is within or part of an overall development, a binding Site Plan, or
a planned unit development, which has previously provided public access
adequate to serve the project in full build-out through other application
processes.
( 4) Public access shall be located and designed to respect private property rights, be
compatible with the shoreline environment, protect ecological functions and
processes, protect aesthetic values of shoreline, and provide for public safety
(including consistency with CPTED principles, where applicable).
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARoRor QEIVOReZca & Aooooiateo White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
70
Page 280 of 412
JYAO 2015 Februa ry Deeemller 20232
(5) For any development where public access in not required, shared community
access may be allowed if there is no existing or planned public access along the
shoreline identified in the City~, and other agencies' plan. Where provided,
community access shall be subject to all applicable development standards of
this section. Shared community access is not required when any of the
conditions under PMC 29 .01.260 (3) applies.
(6) General Performance Standards:
(a) Uses, activities, and developments shall not interfere with the regular and
established public use.
(b) Shoreline substantial development or conditional uses shall minimize the
impact on views of shoreline waterbodies from public land or substantial
numbers ofresidences.
(c) Proponents shall include within their shoreline applications an evaluation
of a proposed use, activity, or development's likely adverse impact on
current public access and future demands for access to the site. Such
evaluation shall consider potential alternatives and mitigation measures to
further the policies of this SMP and the provisions of this section.
(d) Public access easements, trails, walkways, corridors, and other facilities
may encroach upon any buffers or setbacks required in PMC 29.01,
Article V, Critical Areas, or under other provisions of this SMP, provided
that such encroachment does not conflict with other policies and
regulations of this SMP, and no net Joss of ecological function can be
achieved. Any encroachment into a buffer or setback must be as close to
the landward edge of the buffer as possible.
(e) Public access facilities shall accommodate persons with disabilities, unless
determined infeasible by the Shoreline Administrator.
(7) Trails and Levees:
(a) Existing improved and primitive public trails shall be maintained and
enhanced.
(b) Shoreline in private ownership should provide public access when feasible
as follows:
(i) Easement for public access; and
(ii) Physical or visual public access when feasible and when
mentioned in the City's Public Access Plan , or other agencies'
management plan.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anshor QE/\lOno;ea & Assosialos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
71
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 281 of 412
JuRo 2Q1 liFebruary Dosem~or 20232
( c) Where public access is to be provided by dedication of public access
easements along the OHWM, the minimum width of such easements shall
be 20 feet.
(d) The total width of trail, including shoulders, shall be 20 feet maximum or
as required by Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations.
( e) Pervious pavings are encouraged for all trails and are required for trail
shoulders.
(f) Trails should make use of an existing constructed grade such as those
formed by an abandoned rail grade, road, or utility when feasible.
(g) Trails shall be located, constructed, and maintained so as to avoid, to the
maximum extent possible, removal and other impacts to perennial native
vegetation consistent with a Habitat Management Plan.
(h) Trails on private properties and not open for public use shall be up to
5 feet wide.
(8) Rights-of-way, Easements, and Streets for Public Access:
(a) The City shall maintain public rights-of-ways or easements as a means of
retaining public access on the shoreline. Proposed use, activity, or
developments shall maintain public access provided by public street ends,
public utilities, and rights-of-way.
(b) The public easements required pursuant to this section, for the purpose of
providing access across or through the site to the OHWM, shall be
maintained by the property owner to provide for reasonable and safe
public access to the OHWM.
(9) Where public access routes terminate, connections should be made with the
nearest public street unless determined by the Shoreline Administrator to be
infeasible. Public access facilities required for an approved or permitted use,
activity, or development shall be completed prior to occupancy and use of the
site or operation of the activity. Public access shall make adequate provisions,
such as screening, buffer strips, fences, and signs, to prevent trespass upon
adjacent properties and to protect the value and enjoyment of adjacent or nearby
private properties and natural areas.
(10) Off-site public access may be permitted by the City where it results in an equal
or greater public benefit than on-site public access, or when on-site limitations
of security, environment, compatibility, or feasibility are present. Off-site public
access may include, but is not limited to, adequate access on public lands in
proximity to the site, opportunity to increase public lands and access with
adjoining or proximate public area, enhancing a City-designated public property
(e.g., existing public recreation site, existing public access, road abutting a body
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Am;hor QEl'lOReza & Assesiates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
72
Page 282 of 412
June 2015 February9esemller 202~
of water, or similar) in accordance with City standards, or other related
measures.
(11) Signage:
(a) Signage to be approved by the Shoreline Administrator shall be
conspicuously installed along public access easements, trails, walkways,
corridors, and other facilities to indicate the public's right ofuse and the
hours of operation. Public access and interpretive displays may be
provided for publicly funded restoration projects where significant
ecological impacts are addressed. The proponent shall bear the
responsibility for establishing and maintaining signs.
(b) The Shoreline Administrator may require the proponent to post signage
restricting or controlling the public's access to specific shoreline areas.
The proponent shall bear the responsibility for establishing and
maintaining such signage.
29.01.270 Flood Hazard Reduction
(I) Development in floodplains shall avoid significantly or cumulatively increasing
flood hazards. Development shall be consistent with this SMP, as well as
applicable guidelines ofFEMA and PMC 29.01.550, Flood Hazard Areas, and
PMC 24.20, Provisions for Flood Hazard protection.
(2) Existing structural flood hazard reduction measures, such as levees, may be
repaired and maintained as necessary to protect legal uses on the landward side
of such structures. Increases in height of an existing levee, with any associated
increase in width, that may be needed to prevent a reduction in the authorized
level of protection of existing legal structures and uses shall be considered an
element ofrepair and maintenance.
(3) Flood hazard reduction measures shall not result in channelization of normal
stream flows, interfere with natural hydraulic processes such as channel
migration, or undermine existing structures or downstream banks.
(4) New development and subdivisions. Approve new development or subdivisions
when it can be reasonably foreseeable that the development or use would not
require structural flood hazard reduction measures within floodway during the
life of the development or use consistent with the following
(WAC 173-26-221(3)(c)(i)):
(a) Floodway:
l:B{QL_New development and subdivisions shall be subject to applicable
floodway regulations in PMC 29.01 .550, Flood Hazard Areas, and PMC
24.20, Provisions for Flood Hazard protection.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QENOno,,:a & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
73
[ Formatted: Heading 6
Page 283 of 412
,h,1Re 201 fi February Desember 20232
(5) New public and private structural flood hazard reduction measures shall be
approved when a scientific and engineering analysis demonstrates the
following:
(a) They are necessary to protect existing development;
(b) Non-structural measures such as setbacks, land use controls, wetland
restoration, dike removal, use or structure removal or relocation,
biotechnical measures, and storm water management programs are not
feasible;
(c) Adverse impacts on ecological functions and priority species and habitats
can be successfully mitigated so as to ensure no net loss; and
( d) Appropriate vegetation conservation actions are undertaken consistent
with PMC 29.01.240, Shoreline Vegetation Conservation.
(6) Flood hazard reduction measures shall be placed landward of associated
wetlands and designated shoreline buffers, except for actions that increase
ecological functions, such as wetland restoration, or when no other alternative
location to reduce flood hazard to existing development is feasible as
determined by the Shoreline Administrator.
(7) New public structural flood hazard reduction measures, such as levees, shall
dedicate and improve public access pathways, unless public access
improvements would cause unavoidable health or safety hazards to the public,
inherent and unavoidable security problems, unacceptable and unmitigable
significant adverse ecological impacts, unavoidable conflict with the proposed
use, or a cost that is disproportionate and unreasonable to the total long-term
cost of the development.
(8) In those instances when management of vegetation as required by this SMP
conflicts with vegetation provisions included in state, federal, or other flood
hazard agency documents governing City-authorized, legal flood hazard
reduction measures, the vegetation requirements of this SMP will not apply.
However, the applicant shall submit documentation of these conflicting
provisions with any shoreline permit applications and shall comply with all
other provisions of this section and this SMP that are not strictly prohibited by
the approving flood hazard agency.
(9) The removal of gravel or other riverbed material for flood-management
purposes shall be consistent with the PMC 29.01.350, Dredging and Dredge
Material Disposal, and PMC 29.01 .390, Mining, and be allowed only after a
biological and physical conditions study shows extraction has no effect on or
provides a long-term benefit to flood hazard reduction, and does not result in a
net loss of ecological functions.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QEA1Oneza & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
74
Page 284 of 412
JuRe :!01 li Februaryl:leGember 20232
(10) Roads shall be located outside the floodway, except necessary crossings, which
shall be placed perpendicular to the waterbody as much as is physically feasible.
New transportation facilities shall be designed so the effective base flood
storage volume of the floodplain is not reduced. The applicant shall provide all
necessary studies, reports, and engineering analyses, which shall be subject to
review and modification by the Shoreline Administrator. If proposed
transportation facilities effectively provide flood control, they shall comply with
policies and regulations of this section.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ansher QEIVOneil!a & /\sseciales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
75
Page 285 of 412
June 2016 February0esember 20232
Article N. Shoreline Modifications and Use Regulations
29.01.300 Agriculture
(I) The SMP shall not require modification of or limit existing agricultural
activities occurring on agricultural lands consistent with RCW 90.58.065.
(2) For shoreline areas used for agriculture, new uses, activities, and development
that are not existing and ongoing, agriculture shall be subject to the following
requirements:
(a) Such uses, activities, and development shall be allowed or permitted in a
manner to ensure maintenance of ecological functions and be consistent
with the City's land use plan.
(b) If the new use, activity, or development is more intensive than the existing
land use, no significant vegetation removal, development, or grading shall
occur in the shoreline buffer without associated mitigation, except as
necessary to accommodate low-intensity, water-dependent uses and public
access that sustains ecological functions.
(c) New agricultural lands created by diking, draining, or filling wetlands
shall not be allowed.
(d) Conversion ofland for new agricultural use or activities that are not
consistent with the PMC Title 25, Zoning, shall not be allowed.
(3) A Substantial Development Permit shall be required for all agricultural
developments not specifically exempted by the provisions of
PMC 29.01.770 (4)(e) except for agricultural developments in
Shoreline Residential environment designation where a Shoreline Special Use
Permit shall be required.
(4) SMP provisions shall apply in the following cases:
(a) New agricultural activities on land not meeting the definition of
agricultural land;
(b) Expansion of agricultural activities on non-agricultural lands;
( c) Conversion of agricultural lands to other uses;
(d) Other development on agricultural land that does not meet the definition
of agricultural activities; and
(e) Agricultural development and uses not specifically exempted by the SMA.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGFlor QEIVORe:zca & AssosialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
76
Page 286 of 412
J11Re :!016 February December 2023:!
(5) New non-agricultural activities proposed on agricultural lands shall be
consistent with the environment designation and the Shoreline Use and
Modification Matrix table (PMC 29.01 .200 (2)), as well as other applicable
shoreline use standards, including Commercial (PMC 29.01.340) or Residential
(PMC 29.01 .420).
(6) Agricultural uses and development shall be located and designed to ensure no
net loss of ecological functions and no significant adverse impact on other
shoreline resources and values.
(7) New feedlots are prohibited in shoreline areas.
(8) Agricultural uses and activities shall prevent and control erosion of soils and
bank materials within shoreline areas. They shall minimize siltation, turbidity,
pollution, and other environmental degradation of watercourses and wetlands.
(9) Agricultural chemicals shall be applied in a manner consistent with BMPs for
agriculture and PMC 29.01.250 (5).
(10) New agricultural activities shall not remove existing native or non-native
vegetation, exce pt for noxious and invasivciJHt nen nexietis, wees vegetation,
between all cropland or pasture areas and adjacent waters or wetlands pursuant
to the critical areas provisions of this SMP .
(11) Agricultural development shall conform to applicable state and federal policies
and regulations.
29.01.320 Boating Facilities
(I) General Requirements:
(a) All boating uses, development, and facilities shall protect the rights of
navigation .
(b) Boating facilities shall be sited and designed to ensure no net loss of
shoreline ecological functions and shall meet Washington State
Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) requirements and other state
guidance if located in or over state-owned aquatic lands.
(c) Boating facilities shall be located on stable shorelines in areas where:
(i) Such facilities will not adversely affect flood channel capacity or ◄
otherwise create a flood hazard;
(ii) Water depths are adequate to minimize spoil disposal, filling,
beach enhancement, and other channel maintenance activities; and
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anshor QeNOno.,a & Assooialos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
77
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 287 of 412
JuRo :!Q16 February Desemher 202~
(iii) Water depths are adequate to prevent the structure from grounding
out at the lowest low water or stoppers are installed to prevent
grounding out.
( d) Boating facilities shall not be located:
(i) Where new dredging will be required; or
(ii) Where wave action caused by boating use would increase bank
erosion rates, unless no-wake zones are implemented at the
facility.
(e) Boating uses and facilities shall be located far enough from public
swimming beaches and aquaculture harvest areas to alleviate any aesthetic
or adverse impacts, safety concerns, and potential use conflicts.
(f) In-water work shall be scheduled to protect biological productivity
(including, but not limited to, fish runs, spawning, and benthic
productivity).
(g) Accessory uses at boating facilities shall be:
(i) Limited to water-oriented uses, including uses that provide
physical or visual shoreline access for substantial numbers of the
general public; and
(ii) Located as far landward as possible, while still serving their
intended purposes.
(h) Parking and storage areas shall be landscaped or screened to provide
visual and noise buffering between adjacent dissimilar uses or scenic
areas.
(i) Boating facilities shall locate where access roads are adequate to handle
the traffic generated by the facility and shall be designed so that lawfully
existing or planned public shoreline access is not unnecessarily blocked,
obstructed, or made dangerous.
(j) Joint-use moorage with IO or more berths is regulated under this section as
a marina (Section 3 below). Joint-use moorage with fewer than 10 berths
is regulated under this section as a dock or pier (see PMC 29.01 .400, Piers
and Docks).
(k) All marinas and public launch facilities shall provide at least portable
restroom facilities for boaters' use that are clean, well-lit, safe, and
convenient for public use.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.nGllor QEA/Oneea & l'.sseeiates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
78
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 288 of 412
June 2015 Februa ryCeGember 20232
(I) Installation of boat waste disposal facilities, such as pump-outs and
portable dump stations, shall be required at all marinas and shall be
provided at public boat launches to the extent possible. The locations of
such facilities shall be considered on an individual basis in consultation
with the Washington State Department of Health, Ecology, WDNR,
Washington State Parks, and WDFW, as necessary.
(m) All utilities shall be placed at or below dock levels or below ground, as
appropriate.
(n) When appropriate, marinas and boat launch facilities shall install public
safety signs that include the locations of fueling facilities, pump-out
facilities, and locations for proper waste disposal.
(o) Boating facilities shall be constructed of materials that will not adversely
affect water quality or aquatic plants and animals over the long term.
Materials used for submerged portions, decking, and other components
that may come in contact with water shall be approved by applicable state
agencies for use in water to avoid discharge of pollutants from wave
splash, rain, or runoff. Wood treated with creosote, copper chromium,
arsenic, pentachlorophenol, or other similarly toxic materials is prohibited
for use in moorage facilities.
(p) Boating facilities in waters providing a public drinking water supply shall
be constructed of untreated materials such as untreated wood, approved
plastic composites, concrete, or steel (see PMC 29.01. 250, Water Quality,
Stormwater, and Nonpoint Pollution).
(q) Vessels shall be restricted from extended mooring on waters of the state,
except as allowed by state regulations and provided that a lease or
permission is obtained from the state and impacts to navigation and public
access are mitigated.
(2) Boat Launch Facilities:
(a) Public boat launch facilities may be allowed in areas where no launching
opportunities exist within close proximity of a site (within less than
3 miles distance by road on a waterbody) or as mentioned in the Public
Access Plan.
(b) Boat launch and haul-out facilities, such as ramps, marine travel lifts and
marine railways, and minor accessory buildings, shall be designed and
constructed in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on flu vial
processes, biological functions, aquatic and riparian habitats, water
quality, navigation, and neighboring uses.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.nGRer QEP/Oneza & Asseoiales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
79
Page 289 of 412
J1rno 2015Fobruary Dosomllor 20232
( c) Boat launch facilities shall be designed and constructed using
methods/technology that have been recognized and approved by state and
federal resource agencies as the best currently available.
(3) Marinas:
(a) Marinas shall be designed to:
(i) Provide flushing of all enclosed water areas;
(ii) Allow the free movement of aquatic life in shallow water areas;
and
(iii) Avoid and minimize any interference with geohydraulic processes
and disruption of existing shore forms.
(b) Open pile or floating breakwater designs shall be used unless it can be
demonstrated that riprap or other solid construction would not result in
any greater net impacts to shoreline ecological functions, processes, fish
passage, or shore features.
(c) Wet-moorage marinas shall locate a safe distance from domestic sewage
or industrial waste outfalls.
( d) To the maximum extent possible, marinas and accessory uses shall share
parking facilities.
(e) New marina development shall provide public access amenities such as
viewpoints, interpretive displays, and public access to accessory
water-enjoyment uses (e.g., restaurants).
( f) If a marina is to include gas and oil handling facilities, such facilities shall
be separate from main centers of activity in order to minimize the fire and
water pollution hazards and to facilitate fire and pollution control. Marinas
shall have adequate facilities and procedures for fuel handling and storage,
and the containment, recovery, and mitigation of spilled petroleum,
sewage, and other potentially harmful or hazardous materials and toxic
products.
(g) The marina operator shall be responsible for the collection and dumping of
sewage, solid waste, and petroleum waste.
29.01.330 Breakwater, Jetties, Groins, and Weirs
(I) Breakwaters shall be allowed in environments defined in PMC 29.01.200 (2),
Shoreline Use and Modification Matrix, with a Shoreline Special Use Permit.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARcRor QEl',i0Re2Ea & AcsecialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
80
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 290 of 412
June 201 SFebruaryDecember 20232
(2) New, expanded, or replacement groins and weirs shall only be permitted if the
applicant demonstrates that the proposed groin or weir will not result in a net
loss of shoreline ecological functions and the structure is necessary for
water-dependent uses, public access, shoreline stabilization, or other specific
public purposes.
(3) Groins and weirs shall require a Special Use Permit, except when such
structures are installed to protect or restore ecological functions such as
installation of groins that may eliminate or minimize the need for hard shoreline
stabilization.
(4) Groins and weirs shall be located, designed, constructed, and operated
consistent with mitigation sequencing principles, including avoiding critical
areas, as provided in PMC 29.01.230, Environmental Protection.
29.01.340 Commercial Development
(1) Water-dependent commercial development shall be given priority over
non-water-dependent commercial uses within shoreline environments.
Secondarily, water-related and water-oriented uses shall be given priority over
non-water-oriented commercial uses.
(2) Non-water-oriented commercial uses shall be allowed if they can demonstrate at
least one or more of the following:
(a) The commercial use is part of a mixed-use project that includes
water-dependent uses and provides a significant public benefit with
respect to the objectives of the SMA.
(b) Navigability is severely limited at the proposed site, including
opportunities for non-motorized boating or other water-oriented uses.
( c) The commercial use is physically separated from the shoreline by another
property, public right-of-way, or levee.
(d) The commercial use is farther upland than 200 feet from the OHWM;
therefore, a water-oriented use is not a viable option.
(3) Non-water-oriented uses, including, but not limited to, residential uses, may be
located with water-oriented commercial uses provided:
(a) The mixed-use project includes one or more water-dependent uses.
(b) Water-dependent commercial uses, as well as other water-oriented
commercial uses, have preferential locations along the shoreline.
( c) The underlying zoning district permits residential uses together with
commercial uses.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anwf>f QE/VOneza & l'.sseciates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
81
Page 291 of 412
Juno 2015 February Desember 20232
(d) Public access is provided and/or ecological restoration is provided as a
public benefit.
(4) Review Criteria. The City shall utilize the following information in its review of
all commercial development applications:
(a) Whether there is a water-oriented aspect of the proposed commercial use
or activity when it is located within 200 feet of the OHWM;
(b) Whether the proposed commercial use is consistent with the Shoreline Use
and Modification Matrix (PMC 29.01.200 (2));
(c) Whether the application has the ability to enhance compatibility with the
shoreline environment and adjacent uses;
( d) Whether adequate provisions are made for public and private visual and
physical shoreline access; and
(e) Whether the application makes adequate provisions to prevent adverse
environmental impacts and provide for shoreline ecological or critical area
mitigation, where appropriate.
(5) Commercial development shall be designed and maintained in a manner
compatible with the character and features of surrounding areas. Developments
are encouraged to incorporate low-impact development techniques into new and
existing projects and integrate architectural and landscape elements that
recognize the river and lake environments. The City may prescribe and modify
project dimensions, screening standards, setbacks, or operation intensities to
achieve this purpose.
(6) Eating and drinking facilities and lodging facilities shall be oriented to provide
views to the waterfront, when such view is available from the site.
(7) Commercial uses shall provide for public access as a condition of approval,
unless such public access is demonstrated by the proponent to be infeasible or
inappropriate for the shoreline pursuant to PMC 29.01 .260, Public Access.
(8) Commercial uses shall provide for suitable measures to rehabilitate and enhance
the shoreline ecology as a condition of approval.
(9) Non-water-oriented commercial uses shall not be allowed over water in any
shoreline environment.
(10) All commercial loading and service areas shall be located upland or away from
the shoreline. Provisions shall be made to screen such areas with walls, fences,
and landscaping and to minimize aesthetic impacts.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
/I.Rehor Qii£,6/ORezca & AssecialosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
82
Page 292 of 412
June 2016 Februa ryDesemller 20232
(11) The storage of potentially hazardous or dangerous substances or wastes is
prohibited in the floodway or within 200 feet of the OHWM, whichever
boundary extends farthest landward.
(12) Development shall be located, designed, and constructed in a manner that
ensures no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and without significant
adverse impacts on other preferred land uses and public access features.
29.01.350 Dredging and Dredge Material Disposal
( l) Dredging:
(a) New dredging shall be permitted only where it is demonstrated that the
proposed water-dependent or water-related uses will not result in
significant or ongoing adverse impacts to water quality, Fish and Wildlife
Habitat Conservation Areas and other critical areas, flood holding
capacity, natural drainage and water circulation patterns, significant plant
communities, prime agricultural land, and public access to shorelines,
unless one or more of these impacts cannot be avoided. When such
impacts are unavoidable, they shall be minimized and mitigated such that
they result in no net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
{b) Dredging and dredge disposal shall be prohibited on or in archaeological
sites that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places and the
Washington Heritage Register until such time that they have been
reviewed and approved by the appropriate agency.
{ c) Dredging techniques that cause minimum dispersal and broadcast of
bottom material shall be used, and only the amount of dredging necessary
shall be permitted.
{d) Dredging shall be permitted only:
(i) For navigation or navigational access;
(ii) In conjunction with a water-dependent use ofwaterbodies or
adjacent shoreline areas;
( iii) As part of an approved habitat improvement project;
(iv) To improve water flow or water quality, provided that all dredged
material shall be contained and managed so as to prevent it from
re-entering the water; or
(v) In conjunction with a bridge, navigational structure, or wastewater
treatment facility for which there is a documented public need and
where other feasible sites or routes do not exist.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGhor QfiNORozca & AssoGialss White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
83
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 293 of 412
June 2015 Februarv DeGember 20232-
(e) Dredging for fill is prohibited except where the material is necessary for
restoration of shoreline ecological functions.
(2) Dredge Material Disposal:
(a) Upland dredge material disposal within shoreline jurisdiction is
discouraged. In the limited circumstances when it is allowed, it will be
permitted under the following conditions:
(i) Shoreline ecological functions and processes will be preserved,
restored, or enhanced, including protection of surface and
groundwater;
( ii) Erosion, sedimentation, floodwaters, or runoff will not increase
adverse impacts on shoreline ecological functions and processes or
property; and
(iii) The site will ultimately be suitable for a use allowed by this SMP.
(b) Dredge material disposal shall not occur in wetlands, except as authorized
by Special Use Permit as part of a shoreline restoration project.
( c) Dredge material disposal within areas assigned an Aquatic environment
designation may be approved only when authorized by applicable
agencies, which may include the USACE pursuant to Section 404
(Clean Water Act) permits, WDFW's Hydraulic Project Approval, and/or
the Dredged Material Management Program of the WDNR; and when one
of the following conditions apply:
(i) Land disposal is infeasible, less consistent with this SMP, or
prohibited by law; or
(ii) Disposal as part of a program to restore or enhance shoreline
ecological functions and processes is not feasible.
( d) Dredge materials approved for disposal within areas assigned an Aquatic
environment designation shall comply with the following conditions:
(i) Aquatic habitat will be protected, restored, or enhanced;
(ii) Adverse effects on water quality or biologic resources from
contaminated materials will be mitigated;
(iii) Shifting and dispersal of dredge material will be minimal; and
(iv) Water quality will not be adversely affected.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGllor QfiAlORezca & Associates White Bluffs Consultinq
Draft
84
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 294 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry Desember 20232
(e) When required by the Shoreline Administrator, revegetation ofland
disposal sites shall occur as soon as feasible in order to retard wind and
water erosion and to restore the wildlife habitat value of the site. Native
species shall be used in the revegetation.
(f) Dredge material disposal operating periods and hours shall be limited to
those stipulated by the WDFW and hours from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM
Monday through Friday, except in time of emergency as authorized by the
Shoreline Administrator. Provisions for buffers at land disposal or transfer
sites, in order to protect public safety and other lawful interests and to
avoid adverse impacts, shall be required.
(3) Submittal Requirements. The following information shall be required for all
dredging applications:
(a) A description of the purpose of the proposed dredging and analysis of
compliance with the policies and regulations of this SMP.
(b) A detailed description of the existing physical character, shoreline
geomorphology, and biological resources provided by the area proposed to
be dredged, including:
(i) A site plan map outlining the perimeter of the proposed dredge
area, including the existing bathymetry ( water depths that indicate
the topography of areas below the OHWM), and having data points
at a minimum of2-foot depth increments.
(ii) A Critical Areas Detailed Studies according to
PMC 29.01.510 (10).
(iii) A mitigation plan, if necessary, to address any identified adverse
impacts on ecological functions or processes.
(iv) Information on stability of areas adjacent to proposed dredging and
spoils disposal areas.
(v) A detailed description of the physical, chemical, and biological
characteristics of the dredge materials to be removed, including:
(A) Physical analysis of material to be dredged (e.g., material
composition and amount, grain size, organic materials
present, and source of material).
(B) Chemical analysis of material to be dredged (e.g., volatile
solids, chemical oxygen demand, grease and oil content,
and mercury, lead, and zinc content).
(C) Biological analysis of material to be dredged.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QEl'/Onoza & AsseeialosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
85
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 295 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry Desemller 20232
(c) A description of the method of materials removal, including facilities for
settlement and movement.
(d) Dredging procedure, including the length of time it will take to complete
dredging, method of dredging, and amount of materials removed.
(e) Frequency and quantity of project maintenance dredging.
(t) Detailed plans for dredge spoil disposal, including specific land disposal
sites and relevant information on the disposal site, including, but not
limited to:
(i) Dredge material disposal area;
(ii) Physical characteristics, including location, topography, existing
drainage patterns, and surface and ground_ water;
(iii) Size and capacity of disposal site;
(iv) Means of transportation to the disposal site;
(v) Proposed dewatering and stabilization of dredged material;
(vi) Methods of controlling erosion and sedimentation; and
(vii) Future use of the site and conformance with land use policies and
regulations.
(g) Total estimated initial dredge volume.
(h) Plan for disposal of maintenance spoils for at least a 20-year period, if
applicable.
(i) Hydraulic modeling studies sufficient to identify existing geohydraulic
patterns and probable effects of dredging.
29.01.360 Fill and Excavation
(1) Fill and excavation waterward of the OHWM, except to support ecological
restoration, requires a Special Use Permit and may be permitted only when:
(a) In conjunction with water-dependent or public access uses allowed by this
SMP;
(b) In conjunction with a bridge, levee, or transportation facility of statewide
significance, for which there is a demonstrated public need and where no
feasible upland sites, design solutions, or routes exist;
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anohor QEIVOneza & AssooiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
86
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 296 of 412
June :!016 Februa ry geseml3er 20232
(c) In conjunction with implementation of an interagency environmental
cleanup plan to clean up and dispose of contaminated sediments;
( d) Disposal of dredged material considered suitable under, and conducted in
accordance with, the Washington State Dredged Material Management
Program; or
(e) In conjunction with any other environmental restoration or enhancement
project.
(2) Waterward of the OHWM, pile or pier supports shall be utilized whenever
feasible in preference to fills. Fills for approved road development in floodways
or wetlands shall be permitted only if pile or pier supports are proven not
feasible.
(3) Fill upland and waterward of the OHWM, including in non-watered side
channels, shall be permitted only where it is demonstrated that the proposed
action will not:
(a) Result in significant ecological damage to water quality, fish, and/or
wildlife habitat;
(b) Adversely alter natural drainage and circulation patterns, currents, or river
flows, or significantly reduce flood water capacities;
( c) Alter geomorphic or hydro logic processes; and
(d) Significantly reduce public access to the shoreline or significantly
interfere with shoreline recreational uses.
( 4) Fills are prohibited in the floodway, except when approved by Special Use
Permit and where required in conjunction with uses allowed by this SMP.
(5) Fills are allowed in floodplains outside of the floodway only where they would
not alter the hydro logic characteristics or flood storage capacity, or inhibit
channel migration that would, in turn, increase flood hazard or other damage to
life or property and are consistent with FEMA standards and PMC 24.20,
Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection, and PMC 29.01.550, Flood Hazard
Areas.
(6) Fill shall be of the minimum amount and extent necessary to accomplish the
purpose of the fill.
(7) Excavation waterward of the OHWM or within wetlands shall be considered
dredging for purposes of this SMP .
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ancher QElVOneii!a & AsseG.iates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
87
Page 297 of 412
JuRe 201 fi Februar v 9esemller 20232
(8) Fills or excavation shall not be located where shore stabilization will be
necessary to protect materials placed or removed. Disturbed areas shall be
immediately stabilized and revegetated, as applicable.
(9) Fills, beach development or nourishment, and excavation shall be designed to
blend physically and visually with existing topography whenever possible, so as
not to interfere with long-term appropriate use, including lawful access and
enjoyment of scenery.
29.01.370 Industrial Development
(1) Water-dependent industrial development shall be given priority over
non-water-dependent commercial uses within shoreline environments.
Secondarily, water-related and water-oriented uses shall be given priority over
non-water-oriented commercial uses.
(2) Non-water-oriented industrial uses shall be allowed if they can demonstrate one
or more of the following:
(a) The industrial use is part of a mixed-use project that includes
water-dependent uses and provides a significant public benefit with
respect to the objectives of the SMA.
(b) Navigability is severely limited at the proposed site, including
opportunities for non-motorized boating or other water-oriented uses.
( c) The industrial use is physically separated from the shoreline by another
property, public right-of-way, or levee.
(d) The industrial use is farther upland than 200 feet from the OHWM;
therefore, a water-oriented use is not a viable option.
(3) Where industrial use is proposed for location on land in public ownership,
public access should be required unless such public access is demonstrated by
the proponent to be infeasible or inappropriate for the shoreline pursuant to
PMC 29.01.260, Public Access.
(4) Industrial uses shall provide for suitable measures to rehabilitate and enhance
the shoreline ecology as a condition of approval.
(5) Non-water-oriented industrial uses shall not be allowed over water in any
shoreline environment.
(6) All industrial loading and service areas shall be located upland or away from the
shoreline, except when loading services are water-dependent such as barge
facilities. Provisions shall be made to screen upland loading areas with walls,
fences, and landscaping and to minimize aesthetic impacts.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARctwr Ql£1V0Reza & l'.ccociatecWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
88
Page 298 of 412
Juno 201 liFobruaryi;:>esombor 20232
(7) The new storage of potentially hazardous or dangerous substances or wastes is
prohibited in the flood way or within 200 feet of the OHWM, whichever
boundary extends farthest landward.
(8) Industrial development will be located, designed, or constructed in a manner
that ensures no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and such that it does
not have significant adverse impacts to other shoreline resources and values.
29.01.380 In-stream Structures
(I) In-stream structures are those structures placed by humans within a stream or
river waterward of the OHWM that either cause OT have the potential to cause
water impoundment or the diversion, obstruction, or modification of water flow .
In-stream structures may include those for hydroelectric generation, irrigation,
water supply, flood control, transportation, utility service transmission,
structures primarily intended for fisheries management, OT other purposes.
Docks, piers, and marinas are not regulated as in-stream structures in this
section of the SlviP. See PMC 29.01.450, Transportation: Trails, Roads, and
Parking, and PMC 29.01.460, Utilities, for regulations governing road and
utility crossings of streams.
(2) General:
(a) The location, planning, and design of in-stream structures shall be
compatible with the following:
(i) The full range of public interests; existing agricultural activities;
water diversion operations, maintenance, and facility upgrade
activities; and providing for public access to shoreline waters,
desire for protection from floods, and need for preservation of
historic and cultural resources.
(ii) Protection and preservation of ecosystem-wide processes and
ecological functions, including, but not limited to, fish and
wildlife, with special emphasis on protecting and restoring priority
habitats and species and water resources and hydrogeological
processes within the context of the hydrology and water
management effects of the Columbia and Snake R ·ver operations
and McNary Pool conditions, as applicable.
(b) New structures shall be designed, located, and constructed consistent with
mitigation sequencing principles in PMC 29.01 .230, Environmental
Protection, and as otherwise limited by floodplain regulations found in
PMC 29 .01 .270, Flood Hazard Reduction, and PMC 29.01 .550, Flood
Hazard Areas .
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARr;tlar QE;NOneza & Aesec;ia!es White Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
89
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5'
Page 299 of 412
June 2015February Desember 20232
(c) New structures shall be designed and located to minimize removal of
riparian vegetation and, if applicable, to return flow to the stream in as
short a distance as possible.
(d) In-stream structures shall provide for adequate upstream and downstream
migration of resident fish, as applicable, and shall not adversely affect
salmonid fish species or adversely modify salmonid fish habitat, as
applicable.
(e) Utilities and transmission lines shall be located so as to minimize
obstruction or degradation of views and comply with applicable provisions
of the Utilities section of this SMP.
(f) Mitigation shall be required of the proponent for the loss of ecological
functions and processes pursuant to PMC 29.01 .230, Environmental
Protection, and PMC 29.01, Article V, Critical Areas. No net loss in
function, value, or acreage shall occur from such development.
(3) Submittal Requirements. In addition to the standard requirements listed in
PMC 29.01.730, Application Requirements, all permit applications for in-
stream structures shall contain, at a minimum, the following additional
information:
(a) A site suitability analysis, which provides sufficient justification for the
proposed site; the analysis must fully address alternative sites for the
proposed development.
(b) Proposed location and design of primary and accessory structures,
transmission equipment, utility corridors, and access/service roads.
( c) A plan that describes the extent and location of vegetation, which is
proposed to be removed to accommodate the proposed facility, and any
site revegetation plans required by this SMP.
(d) A hydraulic analysis prepared by a licensed professional engineer that
sufficiently describes the project's effects on streamway hydraulics,
including potential increases in base flood elevation, changes in stream
velocity, and the potential for redirection of the normal flow of the
affected stream.
(e) A hydrologic analysis that analyzes the project's effects on ecological
processes, including delivery and rate of water and sediment,
geomorphology, and recruitment of organic material.
(f) Biological resource inventory and analysis that sufficiently describes the
project's effects on fish and wildlife resources, prepared by a qualified
professional as defined in the Critical Areas section of this SMP.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ancmor QENOneZ'a & Assosiales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
90
Page 300 of 412
J1me 2016 Februa ry Cecember 20232
(g) Provision for erosion control, protection of water quality, and protection of
fish and wildlife resources during construction.
(h) Long-term management plans that describe in sufficient detail the
provisions for protection of in-stream resources during construction and
operation; the plan shall include means for monitoring its success.
29.01.390 Mining
(1) Mining shall be prohibited waterward of the OHWM.
(2) Mining facilities shall be located within shoreline jurisdiction only when no
feasible sites are available outside shoreline jurisdiction and only after the
applicant has demonstrated compliance with the mitigation sequencing
requirements of PMC 29.01.230, Environmental Protection.
(3) Mining in shoreline jurisdiction shall only be approved when the material
proposed to be extracted is only available in a shoreline location. This
determination shall be based on an evaluation of geologic factors such as the
distribution and availability of mineral resources for that jurisdiction, the need
for such mineral resources, and economic, transportation, and land use factors.
This demonstration may rely on analysis or studies prepared for purposes of the
Comprehensive Plan's designations and may be integrated with any relevant
environmental review conducted under (SEPA; RCW 43.21C) or otherwise be
shown in a manner consistent with RCW 90.58.100(1) and
WAC 173-26-201(2)(a), as amended.
(4) Mining facilities and associated activities shall be designed and located to
prevent loss of ecological function.
(5) Application for permits for mining operations shall be accompanied by
operation plans, reclamation plans, and analysis of environmental impacts
sufficient to make a determination as to whether the project will result in net
loss of shoreline ecological functions and processes during the course of mining
and after reclamation, and how impacts will be mitigated to achieve no net loss
of these functions. Creation, restoration, or enhancement of habitat for priority
species and the future productivity of the site may be considered in determining
no net loss of ecological functions.
(6) Mining proposals must be coordinated and compliant with state Surface Mining
Reclamation Act requirements (RCW 78.44, WAC 332-18).
(7) Preference shall be given to mining uses that result in the creation, restoration,
or enhancement of habitat for priority species.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ancher QEA/One.:a & Asseciales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
91
Page 301 of 412
June 201 i February Desember 20232
29.01.400 Piers and Docks
(1) All boating uses, development, and facilities shall protect the rights of
navigation and demonstrate no net loss of ecological functions, including
providing on-site and off-site mitigation, as applicable.
(2) Shared moorage serving single-family use consisting of docks and piers with
more than four berths, commercial moorage available to the general public, and
moorage related to clubs or other groups not associated with a particular
residential development are regulated as Boating Facilities under PMC
29.01 .320, Boating Facilities.
(3) Docks and piers with four or fewer berths or any number of mooring buoys are
regulated under this section.
(4) Piers and docks shall avoid:
(a) Areas where shoreline modification is required for approach and other
upland facilities.
(b) Locations where they would adversely impact upland riparian or nearshore
habitat for aquatic species.
(c) Locations where they would adversely affect flood channel capacity or
create a flood hazard.
(d) Locations where water depths for vessels are not adequate without
dredging.
(5) Piers and docks, except those accessory to single-family residences, shall
provide public access in accordance with PMC 29.01.260, Public Access, of this
SMP and shall be located and designed such that existing public access to public
shorelines is not obstructed nor made hazardous.
(6) All in-and over-water structures shall be constructed of materials that will not
adversely affect water quality or aquatic plants and animals during the long
term. Wood treated with creosote, pentachlorophenol, or other similarly toxic
materials is prohibited. Docks shall be constructed of untreated materials such
as untreated wood, approved plastic composites, concrete, or steel.
(7) Vessels shall be restricted from extended mooring on waters of the state, except
as allowed by state regulations and unless a lease or other permission is
obtained from the state and impacts to navigation and public access are
mitigated.
(8) Boat Launches:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARoher QEAlOReza & Asseoialos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
92
Page 302 of 412
J1rne 2015FebruaryDeceml:ler 20232
(a) Boat launches accessory to single-family and multi-family residential uses
are prohibited.
(b) Private boat launches shall be allowed only for water-dependent uses and
marinas and only when it is demonstrated that public boat launches will
not feasibly serve the use. Rail and track systems shall be preferred over
concrete ramps.
(c) New public boat launches for general public use or expansion of public
boat launches by adding launch lanes shall demonstrate that:
(i) Water depths are adequate to avoid the need for dredging and
eliminate or minimize potential loss of shoreline ecological
functions or other shoreline resources from offshore or foreshore
channel dredging.
(ii) Adjacent residential properties will not be adversely affected by
adverse proximity impacts such as noise, light and glare, or scale
and aesthetic impacts. Fencing or landscape areas may be required
to provide a visual screen.
(iii) Exterior lighting will not adversely impact aquatic species.
(iv) Adequate provisions are made for restroom, sewage, and solid
waste disposal facilities in compliance with applicable health
regulations.
(v) Access and parking shall not produce traffic hazards, shall not
result in excessive noise or other impacts, shall minimize traffic
impacts on nearby streets, and shall include adequate parking for
boat trailers. Parking on public streets may be allowed for peak
periods if it is demonstrated that such parking will not adversely
impact through traffic or residential uses.
(9) New moorage to serve a single-family residence may be allowed only if:
(a) It is consistent with the USACE McNary Pool Management Plan.
(b) An applicant demonstrates that existing facilities (boat launches and
public and private marinas) are not reasonably available to meet demand.
(c) The lot does not have access to shared moorage in an existing subdivision,
and there is no homeowners association or other corporate entity capable
of developing shared moorage.
( d) In cases where a new dock or pier is approved, the City may require an
agreement to share with nearby residences with water frontage and
provide for expansion to serve such additional users.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QE,0/Onow & Associalos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
93
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 303 of 412
J11Re 2015 Februa ry December 202~
(10) A dock or pier serving a single-family residence shall meet the following
standards:
(a) Piers and Ramps:
(i) To prevent damage to shallow-water habitat, piers and ramps shall •
extend at least 40 feet perpendicular from the OHWM. In some
instances and sites, it may not be practical to extend a ramp 40 feet
from OHWM (for instance, where this could conflict with
navigation). The City may grant exceptions on a case-by-case basis
depending on documentation of specific limitation that exist and in
coordination with other permitting agencies.
(ii) Piers and ramps shall be no more than 4 feet in width.
( iii) The bottom of either the pier or landward edge of the ramp shall be
elevated at least 2 feet above the plane of OHWM.
(iv) Grating shall cover the entire surface area (100%) of the pier or
ramp. The open area of grating shall be at least 50%, as rated by
the manufacturer.
(v) Skirting shall not be placed on piers, ramps, or floats. Protective
bumper material will be allowed along the outside edge of the
float, as long as the material does not extend below the bottom
edge of the float frame or impede light penetration.
(vi) Shoreline concrete anchors must be placed at least IO feet
landward from the OHWM and shall be sized no larger than
4-feet-wide by 4-feet-long, unless otherwise approved by the City,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
fisheries, USACE, and WDFW. The maximum anchor height shall
be only what is necessary to elevate the bottom of either the pier or
landward edge of the ramp at least 2 feet above the plane of
OHWM. The intent of this criterion is to limit impacts to riparian
vegetation along the shoreline. The City may grant exceptions
from the 10-foot landward requirement if site conditions warrant.
Exceptions shall be made on a case-by-case basis and based on
documentation of a specific limitation that exists and in
coordination with other permitting agencies.
(b) Preservatives:
(i) The dock shall be built with materials that do not leach
preservatives or other materials.
(ii) No treated wood of any kind shall be used on any overwater
structure (float, pier, or ramp).
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARehor Q€£.1\/0Ro2ca & l'.ssoe.'alosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
94
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 304 of 412
JuAe 2015 Februa ryDesember 2023~
(iii) No paint, stain, or preservative shall be applied to the overwater
structure.
(c) General:
(i) No electricity shall be provided to , or on, the overwater structure. •
(ii) No boat lifts or watercraft lifts (e.g., Jet Ski lifts) of any type will
be placed on, or in addition to, the overwater structure. The City
may grant exceptions on a case-by-case basis in coordination with
other permitting agencies if the applicant can demonstrate that the
proposed boat lift meets the intent of the criteria to minimize
structure, maximize light penetration, and maximize depth.
However, these structures must meet the size criteria of the plan
(total 160 square feet).
(iii) Shoreline armoring (i.e., bulkheads, riprap, and retaining walls)
shall not occur in association with installation of the overwater
structure.
(iv) Construction of the overwater structure shall be completed during
the in-water work window (November I to February 28).
(d) Piling and Float Anchors:
(i) Piling shall not exceed 8 inches in diameter. The intent of th is
criterion is not to require existing pilings to be removed, cut, or
capped, but to place limits on the size ofnew pilings. The City
may grant exceptions to allow for larger pilings on a case-by-case
basis and in coordination with other permitting agencies in areas
where safety considerations merit it.
(ii) Pilings shall be spaced at least 18 feet apart on the same side of
any component of the overwater structure. The pier/ramp and float
are separate components.
(iii) Each overwater structure shall utilize no more than four piles total
for the entire project. A combination of two piles and four helical
anchors may be used in place of four piles .
(iv) All pilings shall be fitted with devices to prevent perching by
piscivorous ( fish-eating) birds.
(v) Submerged float anchors will be constructed from concrete and
shall be horizontally compressed in form, by a factor of five or
more, for a minimum profile above the stream bed (the horizontal
length and width will be at least five times the vertical height). A
helical screw anchor may be utilized where substrate allows . The
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARslwr QeNORezca & Asses.ialss White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
95
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5 "
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 305 of 412
(e)
J1rno 2015 February DeGember 20232
owner shall be responsible for demonstrating feasibility and for
proper installation such that anchor displacement does not occur.
(vi) No in-water fill material will be allowed, with the exception of
pilings and float anchors. (Note: uncured concrete or its
by-products shall not be allowed.)
Floats:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
Float components shall not exceed the dimensions of 8-by-20 feet, ◄
or an aggregate total of 160 square feet, for all float components.
Flotation materials shall be permanently encapsulated to prevent
breakup into small pieces and dispersal in water (e.g., rectangular
float tubs).
Grating shall cover 100% of the surface area of the float(s). The
open area of the grating shall be no less than 50%, as rated by the
manufacturer.
Functional grating will cover no less than 50% of the float.
Floats shall not be located in shallow-water habitat where they
could ground or impede the passage or rearing of any salmonid life
stage.
(vi) Nothing shall be placed on the overwater structure that will reduce
natural light penetration through the structure.
(vii) Floats shall be positioned at least 40 feet horizontally from the
OHWM and no more than 100 feet from the OHWM, as measured
from the landward-most edge of the float. Adjustments to this
requirement may be made on an individual basis where street
compliance with this standard may present safety issues or be
excessive for site conditions.
(viii) Project construction shall cease during high-flow conditions that
could result in inundation of the project area, except for efforts to
avoid or minimize resource damage.
(11) Shared residential docks and piers shall generally meet the standards for
single-family docks above, except that the number of floats and the size of piers
and other facilities may be increased to serve additional slips to provide one
moorage space per residence served.
(12) Docks and piers shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from side property
lines, except that joint-use facilities may be located closer to, or upon, a side
property line when agreed to by contract or covenant with the owners of the
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AROROf QE,l'/OROW & AssoGiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
96
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 306 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry Desemeer 20232
affected properties. This agreement shall be recorded with the County Auditor
and a copy filed with the Shoreline Permit application.
(13) Moorage related to subdivision:
(a) New subdivisions and short plats shall contain a restriction on the face of
the plat prohibiting individual docks. A site for community or shared
moorage shall be designated on the plat and owned in undivided interest
by property owners within the subdivision. Shared moorage facilities shall
be available to lots with water frontage in the subdivision. The over-water
area of the dock shall be made available to other lots and the public for
community access and may be required to provide public access
depending on the scale of the facility.
(b) Approval ofa shared moorage for a subdivision shall be subject to the
following criteria:
(i) There is no reasonably available public or private moorage that can ◄
serve the moorage needs of the residences or the subdivision.
(ii) Shared moorage to serve new development shall be limited to the
amount of moorage needed to serve lots with water frontage. One
moorage space per lot may not be presumed.
(iii) The size of a dock must consider the use of mooring buoys for
some or all moorage needs and the use of all or part of the dock to
allow tender access to mooring buoys.
(iv) Public access shall be provided in all shared docks utilizing public
aquatic lands that accommodate five or more vessels.
( c) If a community or shared dock is not developed at the time of subdivision,
a community association shall be established with the authority to levy
assessments within the subdivision to construct and maintain a community
dock in the future. The failure of a subdivision to develop a community or
shared dock shall not affect the prohibition on individual docks.
(14) Multi-family residences, hotels, motels, and other commercial developments
proposing to provide moorage facilities shall meet the criteria for a marina. Use
of the moorage must be open to the general public on the same basis as residents
or occupants and shall provide public access. If approved, no more than one
joint-use moorage facility may be provided for a parcel or development.
(15) Applications for docks or piers serving single commercial or industrial
enterprises shall demonstrate that:
(a) The facility serves a water-dependent use;
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anshar QE-1'/0naza & Asses/ates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
97
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 307 of 412
Juno 201 liFebruaryDesember 2023a
(b) The facility is the minimum size required to serve the proposed use,
provided that provisions for expansion or future joint use may be
provided;
( c) The facility minimizes impacts to the extent feasible. Where impacts are
unavoidable, the facility mitigates impacts to navigation, aquatic habitat,
upland habitat, public access to the water for recreation, fishing and
similar use, and public access to publicly accessible lands below the
OHWM.
(16) Commercial or industrial moorage facilities shall demonstrate that:
(a) The dock or pier shall be the minimum length required to serve the use.
(b) Access from the shore to piers or floats shall minimize water cover in
order to minimize impacts to shallow-water habitat.
(c) Piers and ramps shall be elevated to provide the maximum feasible light
penetration.
( d) Grating, or clear translucent material, shall be utilized to the maximum
extent feasible to provide light penetration.
(e) Floats shall be constructed and attached so they do not ground out on the
substrate.
(f) Pile spacing shall be the maximum feasible to minimize shading and avoid
a wall effect that would block or baffle wave patterns, currents, littoral
drift, or movement of aquatic life forms, or result in structure damage
from driftwood impact or entrapment.
(g) Pile diameter shall be minimized while meeting structural requirements.
(h) Covered structures may be permitted only to serve a water-dependent use
where it is demonstrated that adequate upland sites are not feasible and the
area covered is the minimum necessary to serve the use.
( 17) Barge terminals are a particular use that can include docks, piers, and industrial
moorage. These facilities must demonstrate those items as provided in
PMC 29.01.100 (16), but the SMP recognizes that barge terminals require
specific development regulations, including hardening of the shoreline,
dredging, and no setback areas.
29.01.410 Recreational Development
(1) General Preferences:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AnGRor QE,1\/Ono:ea & Assor;ialosWhite Bluffs Consultinq
Draft
98
Page 308 of 412
J1rne 2015 Februa ryDesemller 20232
(a) Recreational uses and facilities shall include features that relate to access,
enjoyment, and use of the City's shorelines.
(b) Both passive and active shoreline recreation uses are allowed.
(c) Water-oriented recreational uses and activities are preferred in shoreline
jurisdiction. Water-dependent recreational uses shall be preferred as a first
priority and water-related and water-enjoyment recreational uses as a
second priority.
(d) Existing passive recreational opportunities, including nature appreciation,
non-motorized trails, public education regarding shoreline ecological
functions and processes, environmental interpretation, and native habitat
protection, shall be maintained. Opportunities incorporating educational
and interpretive information shall be included in design and operation of
recreation facilities and nature trails when feasible.
(e) Preference shall be given to the development and enhancement of public
access to the shoreline to increase fishiHg, eoatiHg, aHa other
water-enjoymentfelatea recreational opportunities.
(2) General Performance Standards:
(a) The potential adverse impacts of all recreational uses shall be mitigated,
and adequate provisions for shoreline rehabilitation shall be made part of
any proposed recreational use or development to ensure no net loss of
shoreline ecological function.
(b) Sites with fragile and unique shoreline conditions, such as high-quality
wetlands and wildlife habitats, shall be used only for non-intensive
recreation activities such as trails, viewpoints, interpretive signage, and
similar passive and low-impact facilities that result in no net loss of
shoreline ecological function, and do not require the construction and
placement of permanent structures.
(c) For proposed recreation developments that require the use offertilizers,
pesticides, or other toxic chemicals, the proponent shall specify the BMPs
to be used to prevent these applications and resultant leachate from
entering adjacent waters.
( d) Recreational developments shall be located and designed to preserve,
enhance, or create scenic views and vistas.
( e) In approving shoreline recreational developments, the
Shoreline Administrator shall ensure the development will maintain,
enhance, or restore desirable shoreline features, including unique and
fragile areas, scenic views, and aesthetic values. The
Shoreline Administrator may, therefore, adjust or prescribe project
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ancller QE/VOneza & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
99
Page 309 of 412
JYAO 2015 Februa ry Desember 202~
dimensions, on-site location of project components, intensity of use,
screening, lighting, parking, and setback requirements.
(3) Signs indicating the public's right to access shoreline areas shall be installed and
maintained in conspicuous locations at all points of access.
(4) Recreational developments shall provide facilities for non-motorized access to
the shoreline, such as pedestrian and bicycle paths, and equestrian access, as
applicable. New motorized vehicle access shall be located and managed to
protect riparian, wetlands, and shrub-steppe habitat functions and value.
(5) Proposals for recreational developments shall include a landscape plan
indicating how native, self-sustaining vegetation is incorporated into the
proposal to maintain ecological functions. The removal of on-site native
vegetation shall be limited to the minimum necessary for the development of
permitted structures or facilities and shall be consistent with provisions of PMC
29.01.240, Shoreline Vegetation Conservation, and PMC 29.01, Article V,
Critical Areas.
( 6) Accessory uses and support facilities such as maintenance facilities, utilities,
and other non-water-oriented uses shall be consolidated and located in upland
areas outside shoreline, wetland, and riparian buffers unless such facilities,
utilities, and uses are allowed in shoreline buffers based on the regulations of
this SMP.
(7) The placement of picnic tables, playground apparatus, and other similar minor
components within the floodways shall be permitted, provided such structures
are located and installed in such a manner as to prevent them from being swept
away during a flood event.
(8) Recreational facilities shall make adequate provisions, such as screening,
landscaping buffer strips, fences, and signs, to prevent trespass on adjacent
properties and to protect the value and enjoyment of adjacent or nearby private
properties and natural areas, as applicable.
(9) Recreational facilities or structures are only allowed to be built over water when
they provide public access or facilitate a water-dependent use and shall be the
minimum size necessary to accommodate the permitted activity.
(I 0) Recreational developments shall make adequate provisions for:
(a) On-site and off-site access and, where appropriate, equestrian access;
(b) Appropriate water supply and waste disposal methods; and
(c) Security and fire protection.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGR0r QEl'iOR0i!8 & AssoGialosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
100
Page 310 of 412
June 2016 FebruaryOesember 20232
( 11) Structures associated with recreational development shall not exceed 3 5 feet in
height, except for as noted in PMC 29.01.210, Development Standards, when
such structures document that the height above 35 feet will not obstruct the view
of a substantial number of adjoining residences.
(12) Recreational development shall minimize effective impervious surfaces in
shoreline jurisdiction and incorporate low-impact development techniques.
29.01.420 Residential Development
(1) Single-family residential development is a preferred use when it is developed in
a manner consistent with SMP provisions.
(2) Residential development shall be located and constructed to result in no net loss
of shoreline ecological function.
(3) Lots for residential use shall have a maximum density consistent with City's
Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations.
(4) Accessory uses and structures shall be located outside of the riparian buffer,
unless the structure is or supports a water-dependent use. Storage structures to
support water-related uses are not water-dependent uses, and therefore, shall be
located outside of the riparian buffer.
(5) All residential development shall be located or designed in such a manner as to
prevent measurable degradation of water quality from stormwater runoff.
Adequate mitigation measures shall be required and implemented where there is
the reasonable potential for such adverse effect on water quality.
( 6) New shoreline residences and appurtenant structures shall be sufficiently set
back from steep slopes and shorelines vulnerable to erosion so structural
improvements, including bluff walls and other shoreline stabilization and
flood-control structures, are not necessary to protect proposed residences and
associated uses.
(7) New floating residences and overwater residential structures shall be prohibited
in shoreline jurisdiction.
(8) New, multi-unit residential development and the subdivision of land into five or
more lots, shall make adequate provisions for public access consistent with the
regulations set forth in PMC 29.01 .260, Public Access.
(9) New residential development shall connect with sewer systems, as required by
thePMC.
( I 0) All new residential development shall meet the vegetation management
provisions contained in PMC 29.01.240, Shoreline Vegetation Conservation,
and PMC 29.01 .530, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anshor QEIVOnoza & Assosialos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
101
Page 311 of 412
JuRe 2Q11i February Desember 20232
(11) Residential development clustering may be required by the
Shoreline Administrator where appropriate to minimize ecological and visual
impacts on shorelines, including minimization of impacts on shoreline
vegetation consistent with PMC 29.01.240, Shoreline Vegetation Conservation.
29.01.430 Shoreline Habitat and Natural Systems Enhancement Projects
(I) Shoreline restoration and enhancement activities designed to restore or enhance
shoreline ecological functions and processes and/or shoreline features should be
targeted toward meeting the needs of sensitive and/or regionally important
plant, fish, and wildlife species, and shall be given priority.
(2) Shoreline restoration, enhancement, and mitigation activities designed to create
dynamic and sustainable ecosystems to assist the City in achieving no net loss
of shoreline ecological functions are preferred.
(3) Restoration activities shall be carried out in accordance with an approved
Shoreline Restoration Plan and in accordance with the provisions of this SMP.
( 4) To the extent possible, restoration, enhancement, and mitigation activities shall
be integrated and coordinated with other parallel natural resource management
efforts, such as those identified in the Shoreline Restoration Plan.
(5) Habitat creation, expansion, restoration, and enhancement projects may be
permitted subject to required state or federal permits when the applicant has
demonstrated that:
(a) The primary objective is clearly restoration or enhancement of the natural
character or ecological function of the shoreline;
(b) The project will not adversely impact spawning, nesting, or breeding in
Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas;
(c) Upstream or downstream properties or Fish and Wildlife Habitat
Conservation Areas will not be adversely affected;
(d) Water quality will not be degraded;
(e) Flood storage capacity will not be degraded;
(f) hnpacts to critical areas and buffers will be avoided and where
unavoidable, minimized and mitigated; and
(g) The project will not interfere with the normal public use of the navigable
waters of the state.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGRO( QEN0R02Ea & A660Giato&White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
102
Page 312 of 412
J1rne ;;!01 ti Februa ry Cecember 2023;;!
29.01.440 Shoreline Stabilization
(I) Shoreline restoration and enhancement activities designed to restore shoreline
ecological functions and processes and/or shoreline features should be targeted
toward meeting the needs of sensitive and/or regionally important plant, fish,
and wildlife speci es, and shall be given priority .
(2) New shoreline stabilization for new development is prohibited unless it can be
demonstrated that reasonable use of a lot or parcel legally created prior to the
effective date of this SMP is precluded without shore protection or is necessary
to restore ecological functions or hazardous substance remediation.
(3) Proposed designs for new or expanded shoreline stabilization shall be designed
in accordance with applicable state guidelines, must use the most current
scientific and technical information available, must document that alternative
solutions are not feasible or do not provide sufficient protection, must
demonstrate that future stabilization measures would not be required on the
project site or adjacent properties, and be certified by a qualified professional.
(4) Land subdivisions and lot line adjustments shall be designed to ensure future
development of the newly created lots will not require structural stabilization for
subsequent development to occur.
(5) New or expanded structural shoreline stabilization is prohibited except when
necessity is demonstrated consistent with the requirements of
WAC 173-26-231(3). Necessity is demonstrated through conclusive evidence
documented by a geotechnical analysis that there is a significant possibility that
the structure will be damaged within 3 years as a result of shoreline erosion
caused by wind/w ave action or other hydraulic forces and only when significant
adverse impacts are mitigated to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological
functions and/or processes.
(6) Replacement of an existing shoreline stabilization structure with a similar
structure is permitted if there is a demonstrated need to protect existing primary
uses, structures or public facilities , including roads, bridges, railways , irrigation
and utility systems from erosion caused by stream undercutting or wave action .
The existing shoreline stabilization structure will be removed from the shoreline
as part of the replacement activity. Replacement walls or bulkheads shall not
encroach waterward of the OHWM or existing structure unless the facility was
occupied prior to January I, 1992, and there are overriding safety or
environmental concerns. Proposed designs for new or expanded shore
stabilization shall be in accordance with applicable state guidelines and certified
by a qualified professional.
(7) Where a geotechnical analysis confirms a need to prevent potential damage to a
primary structure, but the need is not as immediate as 3 years, the analysis may
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGIJ9r Qe/'IOReza & AssgciatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
103
Page 313 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry Desemller 20232
still be used to justify more immediate authorization for shoreline stabilization
using bioengineering approaches.
(8) Shoreline stabilization projects that are part of a fish habitat enhancement
project meeting the criteria of RCW 77.55.181, will be authorized through a
Shoreline Exemption. Stabilization projects that are not part of such a fish
enhancement project will be regulated by this SMP.
(9) Small-scale shoreline stabilization projects ( e.g., tree planting projects or other
minimally intrusive enhancements) shall be reviewed by a qualified professional
to ensure the project has been designed using the most current scientific and
technical information available.
(10) Large-scale or more complex shoreline stabilization projects ( e.g., projects
requiring fill or excavation, placing objects in the water, or hardening the bank)
shall be designed by a qualified professional using the most current scientific
and technical information available. The applicant may be required to have a
qualified professional oversee construction or construct the project.
(11) New stabilization structures, when found to be necessary, will implement the
following standards:
(a) Limit the size of the project to the minimum amount necessary;
(b) Include measures to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions;
and
(c) Use biotechnical bank stabilization techniques unless those are
demonstrated to be infeasible or ineffective before implementing "hard"
structural stabilization measures.
29.01.450 Transportation: Trails, Roads, and Parking
(1) New or expanded motor vehicle and rail transportation facilities shall not be
located within shoreline jurisdiction, unless:
(a) The proponent demonstrates that no feasible upland alternatives exist;
(b) The project represents the minimum development necessary to serve
another specific, localized, and permitted shoreline use; or
( c) In the case of a water crossing, the proponent demonstrates the project is
necessary to further a substantial public interest.
(2) When new roads or road expansions are unavoidable in shoreline jurisdiction,
proposed transportation facilities shall be planned, located, and designed to
achieve the following:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
/!.Reller QEl'.iORoca & /!.ssoeialosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
104
Page 314 of 412
J11Re 2016 FebruarvDeGember 20232
(a) Meet mitigation sequencing provisions of PMC 29.01.230 Environmental
Protection;
(b) Avoid adverse impacts on existing or planned water-oriented uses;
( c) Set back from the OHWM to allow for a usable shoreline area for
vegetation conservation and any preferred shoreline uses unless infeasible;
(d) Minimize grading, vegetation clearing, and alterations of the natural
topography; and
(e) Use BMPs for preventing erosion and degradation of surface water
quality.
(3) Improvements to existing motor vehicle and rail transportation facilities shall
not interfere with pedestrian and bicycle access and shall, whenever possible,
provide for expansion and enhancement of pedestrian and bicycle transportation
facilities.
(4) Transportation facilities and services for motor vehicles and rail shall utilize
existing transportation corridors whenever possible.
(5) The development, improvement, and expansion of pedestrian and bicycle
transportation facilities are allowed within all environments . Such transportation
facilities are a preferred use wherever they are compatible with the natural
character, resources, and ecology of the shoreline.
(6) Pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities shall be designed, located, and
constructed consistent with the policies and regulations for public access as
provided in PMC 29.01.260, Public Access, of this SMP. Linkage among
shoreline parks, recreation areas, and public access points is encouraged, when
feasible.
(7) Parking facilities are not a water-dependent use and shall only be permitted in
the shoreline jurisdiction to support an authorized use where it can be
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Shoreline Administrator that there are no
feasible alternative locations away from the shoreline. Parking as a primary use
shall not be allowed within 50 feet of edge of riparian vegetation corridor.
Accessory parking facilities shall be subject to the same permit type as the
primary use.
(8) Accessory parking facilities shall be planned to avoid or minimize adverse
effects on unique or fragile shoreline features and shall not result in a net loss of
shoreline ecological functions or adversely affect existing or planned
water-dependent uses. Parking facilities shall be located upland of the principal
structure, building, or development they serve, and preferably outside of
shoreline jurisdiction, except:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AReller QElVORei!a & AsseeialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
105
Page 315 of 412
J11Ae 201 li February Desem~er 20232
(a) Where the proponent demonstrates that an alternate location would reduce
adverse impacts on the shoreline and adjacent uses;
(b) Where another location is not feasible; and/or
(c) Except when ADA standards require otherwise.
( d) In such cases, the applicant shall demonstrate use of measures to reduce adverse
impacts of parking facilities in shoreline jurisdiction, such as low-impact
development techniques, buffering, or other measures approved by the
Shoreline Administrator.
(9) Parking facilities shall be landscaped in a manner to minimize adverse visual
and aesthetic impacts on adjacent shoreline and abutting properties.
(10) All forms of transportation facilities shall, wherever feasible, consolidate water
crossings and make joint use of rights-of-way with existing or planned future
primary utility facilities and other transportation facility modalities.
(11) hnprovements to all existing transportation facilities shall provide for the
reestablishment and enhancement of natural vegetation along the shoreline
when appropriate.
(12) Iflocated in the side yard or waterward side of a structure, loading areas shall
be screened from view of pedestrians on either side of the waterway. The visual
screen shall comprise a fence or wall with trees and shrubs consistent with the
City's landscape standards.
(13) Shoreline crossings and culverts shall be designed to minimize adverse impacts
on riparian and aquatic habitat and shall allow for fish passage. See
PMC 29.01 .530, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas, for regulations governing
crossings of non-shoreline streams located in shoreline jurisdiction.
(14) Trails shall be designed consistent with public access requirements in
PMC 29.01 .260, Public Access.
29.01.460 Utilities
(1) Non-water-oriented utility production and processing facilities and transmission
facilities are permitted in shoreline jurisdiction only if no practical upland
alternative or location exists. New primary utility production and processing
facilities or parts of those facilities, such as power plants, solid waste storage, or
disposal facilities that are non-water-oriented, should not be permitted within
shoreline jurisdiction unless no other options are feasible.
(2) The principal uses permitted by this section include sewage collection, holding,
transfer and treatment pipelines, tanks, structures, containment facilities, and
buildings. Water diversion, treatment and conveyance facilities are also
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGRor Q&".'ORera & AooosiateoWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
106
Page 316 of 412
J11Re 2011i Februaryl;lesemeer 20232
considered principle uses. Accessory facilities are also permitted, including, but
not limited to:
(a) Plant monitoring and control facilities and on-site administrative offices;
(b) Plant access and logistical facilities such as storage areas and material
handling ramps and facilities, including utility delivery (electrical and
communication) facilities;
(c) Plant security and safety features such as fences and signage; and
( d) Other accessory or auxiliary uses or features, necessary to effective and
efficient operation of the plant, which cannot feasibly be located outside
the shoreline jurisdiction.
(3) Expansion of existing primary utility facilities within shoreline jurisdiction must
demonstrate:
(a) The expansion is designed to protect adjacent shorelands from erosion,
pollution, or other environmentally detrimental factors during and after
construction.
(b) The project is planned to fit existing natural topography as much as
practical and avoid alteration of the existing natural environment.
( c) Debris, overburden, and other construction waste materials shall be
disposed of so as to prevent erosion or pollution of a waterbody.
( 4) New primary utility facilities and expansions shall include provisions to control
the quantity and quality of surface water runoff to natural waterbodies, using
BMPs to retain natural flow rates. A maintenance program to ensure continued
proper functioning of such new facilities shall be required.
( 5) Applications for installation of utility facilities other than water-dependent
facilities within the High Intensity Environment Designation shall include the
following:
( a) Reason why the utility facility must be in shoreline jurisdiction;
(b) Alternative locations considered and reasons for their elimination;
( c) Location of the same, similar, or other utility facilities in the vicinity of
the proposed project;
(d) Proposed method(s) of construction;
(e) Plans for reclamation of areas to be disturbed during construction;
(f) Landscape plans;
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anshor QENOno.:a & AssoGiates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
107
Page 317 of 412
J11ne :i!01 liFebruary 9eeember 2023a
(g) Methods to achieve no net loss of ecological function and minimize
clearing of native vegetation; and
(h) Consistency with City's plans for utilities, where such plans exist.
(6) Applications for installation of utility facilities shall include the following:
(a) Proposed method(s) of construction;
(b) Plans for reclamation of areas to be disturbed during construction;
(c) Landscape plans; and
( d) Methods to achieve no net loss of ecological function and minimize
clearing of native vegetation.
(7) Where feasible, utilities shall be consolidated within a single easement and
utilize existing rights-of-way. Any utility located within property owned by the
utility, which must of necessity cross shoreline jurisdiction, shall be designed
and operated to reserve the option of general public recreational usage of the
right-of-way in the future. This option shall be exercised by the public only
where:
(a) The public will not be exposed to dangers from the utility equipment; and
(b) The utility itself will not be subjected to unusual risks of damage by the
public.
(8) In areas where utilities must cross shoreline jurisdiction, they shall do so by the
most direct route feasible, unless such a route would negatively affect an
environmentally critical area, obstruct public access to the shoreline, or interfere
with the navigability of a waterbody regulated by this SMP. See PMC
29.01.530, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas, for regulations governing crossings
of non-shoreline streams located in shoreline jurisdiction.
(9) Utility facilities shall be designed and located in a manner that protects scenic
views and minimizes adverse aesthetic impacts.
(10) New utilities, which must be constructed across shoreline jurisdiction in
previously undisturbed areas, must submit a mitigation plan demonstrating the
restoration of the shoreline to at least its existing condition. Upon completion of
utility installation or maintenance, any disturbed areas shall be regraded to be
compatible with the natural terrain of the area and revegetated with appropriate
native plants to prevent erosion.
( 11) Outside of the High Intensity Environment Designations, all underwater
pipelines or those paralleling the waterway transporting liquids potentially
injurious to aquatic life or water quality shall be prohibited, unless no other
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QE,6/-0naZ'a & AccociatacWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
108
Page 318 of 412
June 201 SFebruarvDesember 20232
alternative exists to serve a public interest. In those limited instances where
permitted, shut-off valves shall be provided at both sides of the waterbody
except for public sanitary sewers of a gravity or siphon nature. In all cases, no
net loss of ecological functions shall be maintained.
(12) Where utilities cannot cross a shoreline waterbody via a bridge or other existing
water crossing, the utilities shall evaluate site-specific habitat conditions and
demonstrate whether impacts can mitigated to negatively impact substrate, or
whether utilities will need to be bored beneath the waterbody such that the
substrate is not disturbed. Construction of pipelines placed under aquatic areas
shall be placed in a sleeve to avoid the need for excavation in the event of a
failure in the future.
(13) Minor trenchingLto allow the installation of necessary underground pipes or
cables is allowed ifno alternative, including boring, is feasible, and if:
(a) hnpacts on fish and wildlife habitat are avoided to the maximum extent
possible.
(b) The utility installation shall not increase or decrease the natural rate,
extent, or opportunity of channel migration.
(c) Appropriate BMPs are employed to prevent water quality impacts or other
environmental degradation.
(14) Utility installation and maintenance operations shall be conducted in a manner
that does not negatively affect surface water quality or quantity. Applications
for new utility projects in shoreline jurisdiction shall include a list ofBMPs to
protect water quality.
1 Minor trenchin~ is defined as u11 to 2.5 feet wide and 6 feet dee1 ,. and less than 100 feet.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anshor Qi;;,t,,l()ne;,;a & AsseGialesWhite B{l.lffs Consultin g
Draft
109
Page 319 of 412
June 2015 Februa Desember 20232
Article V. Critical Areas
29.01.500 Critical Areas
(I) Purpose:
(a) The purpose of SMP Article V, Critical Areas, is to conserve and protect
the values and functions of environmentally sensitive and hazardous areas,
which contribute to public health, safety, and welfare of the community
without violating any citizen's constitutional rights to the use of property
as required by the GMA of 1990 (Chapter 17, Laws of 1990) and the SMA
(RCW 90.58) through the application of the most current scientific and
technical information available.
(b) The City shall regulate in shoreline jurisdiction all uses, activities, and
development within, adjacent to, or likely to affect one or more critical
areas.
(2) Critical Areas. Critical areas of concern to the City of Pasco within the shoreline
jurisdiction include:
(a) Wetlands;
(b) Fish and wildlife habitats;
( c) Aquifer recharge areas;
( d) Flood hazard areas; and
(e) Geologically hazardous areas such as those subject to landslide and steep
slope failures, erosion, seismic events, mine collapse, and volcanic
hazards.
(3) Critical Area Categories. The City finds that these critical areas fall into one or
both of the following categories:
(a) Critical areas provide a variety of valuable and beneficial biological and
physical functions that benefit the City and its residents; and
(b) Critical areas pose potential threat to human safety or to public and private
property.
(4) Intent. The intent of this section is to implement the provisions of the GMA,
SMA, and the Comprehensive Plan by managing development in harmony with
critical areas. This section seeks to:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGR0F Q&DIORoz,a & A660G.'ato&White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
110
Page 320 of 412
June 2016 February Qesember 2023.!
(a) Protect members of the public and public resources and facilities from
injury, loss of life, or property damage due to landslides and steep slope
failures, erosion, seismic events, volcanic eruptions, or flooding;
(b) Protect unique, fragile and valuable elements of the environment,
including fish and wildlife and their habitats;
(c) Mitigate unavoidable impacts to environmentally sensitive areas by
regulating alterations in and adjacent to critical areas;
(d) Prevent cumulative adverse environmental impacts to water quality and
wetlands;
(e) Meet the requirements of the Washington GMA (RCW 36.70A), and SMA
(RCW 90.58) with regard to the protection of critical area lands;
(f) Coordinate environmental review and permitting of proposals to avoid
duplication and delay of desirable actions.
(5) Most Current Scientific and Technical Information:
(a) WAC l 73.26.201(2)(a) requires the City to identify and assemble the most
current, accurate, and complete scientific and technical information
available regarding the development of policies related to identification of
and policies governing management recommendations for critical areas.
(b) Critical Area Reports, mitigation plans, and decisions to permit the
alteration of critical areas within the shoreline jurisdiction shall rely on the
most current scientific and technical information to ensure the protection
of the ecological functions and values of critical aFeas, !lfteareas and must
give special consideration to conservation or protection measures
necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fish and their habitat.
(c) The most current scientific and technical information that is consistent
with criteria established in WAC l 73.26.201(2)(a), and may include the
following:
(i) Critical area maps;
(ii) Maps and reference documents in the City of Pasco's Inventory,
Characterization, and Analysis Report, as applicable;
(iii) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle maps;
(iv) Aerial photographs;
(v) Soil Survey of Franklin County, Washington, by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service;
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anshor QE,11/0no;,.a & Assosiatos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
111
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 321 of 412
Juno 2015 Februa ry Desemller 20232
(vi) National Wetland Inventory maps; and
(vii) WDFW Priority Habitats and Species maps.
29.01.510 General Provisions
(1) Authorizations Required. Prior to fulfilling the requirements of this section, the
City shall not grant any approval or permission to alter the condition of any
land, water or vegetation, or to construct or alter any structure or improvement
including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Building Permit;
(b) Special Use Permit;
(c) Shoreline Special Use Permit;
( d) Shoreline Substantial Development Permit;
(e) Shoreline Variance Permit;
(t) Binding Site Plan;
(g) Short Subdivision;
(h) Subdivision;
(i) Zoning Variance Permit;
(j) Rezone; or
(k) Any other adopted permit or required approval not expressly exempted by
this section
(2) Jurisdiction:
(a) This section shall apply to all lands, all land uses and development and all
structures and facilities in City's shoreline jurisdiction-. This section shall
apply to every person, individual, firm, partnership, corporation,
governmental agency or other entity that owns, leases, or administers land
within the City's shoreline jurisdiction.
(b) This section provides regulations for land use and development in and
adjacent to critical areas within the City's shoreline jurisdiction.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QE,iVOnoi,a & Associatos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
112
Page 322 of 412
J11Re .101 li FebruaryCecember 2023.2
(3) Allowed uses:
(a) All allowed activities shall use reasonable methods supported by the most
current scientific and technical information or accepted BMPs with the
least amount of potential impact to the critical areas. Any incidental
damage to or alteration of a critical area that is not a necessary outcome of
the exempted activity shall be restored, rehabilitated, or replaced at the
responsible party's expense. This includes, but is not limited to, access
ways or paths, vegetation removal or damage beyond a reasonable work
zone, and grading and clearing not essential to the ongoing operation of
the site's use. Uses allowed under this section do not give permission to
destroy a critical area or ignore risk from natural hazards. See PMC
29.01.770, Exemptions from Shoreline Substantial Development Permits,
for provisions for exempted activities within shoreline jurisdiction.
Allowed uses include:
(i) Modification of any existing structure that does not alter the
structure to further intrude into a critical area or established buffer
and does not increase risk to life and property. Modification
includes construction of tenant improvements, fences, decks,
patios, driveways, signs, and accessory structures.
(ii) Operation and maintenance of any system of existing dikes, levees,
ditches, drains, or other facilities which were created, developed or
utilized primarily as a part of a drainage or diking system.
Operation and maintenance does not necessarily include the
expansion or new construction of drainage ditches and related
facilities. See PMC 29.01.770, Exemptions from Shoreline
Substantial Development Permits, for additional provisions that
may be applicable.
(iii) Removal of hazardous trees and vegetation and, when necessary,
measures to control or prevent a fire or halt the spread of disease or
damaging insects consistent with the State Forest Practices Act;
RCW 76.09, provided that no vegetation shall be removed from a
critical area or its buffer without approval from the City.
(iv) Activities involving artificially created wetlands or streams
intentionally created from non-wetland sites, including, but not
limited to -: grass-lined swales, irrigation and drainage ditches,
detention facilities, and landscape features, except those features
that provide critical habitat for anadromous fish and those features
that were created as mitigation for projects or alterations subject to
the provisions of this section.
(v) Passive recreational activities, including, but not limited to,
fishing, bird watching, boating, swimming, hiking, and use of
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGRor QEA/ORo;za & /\sseGiales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
113
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 323 of 412
J1,1Ae :!01 li February Desemeer 2023:!
nature trails, provided the activity does not alter the critical area or
its buffer.
(vi) The harvesting of wild crops in a manner that is not injurious to
natural reproduction of such crops and provided the harvesting
does not require tilling soil, planting crops, or changing existing
topography, water conditions or water sources. ·
(vii) Educational and scientific research.
(viii) Existing and ongoing agricultural activities and related
development activities, provided no alteration of flood storage
capacity or conveyance, or increase in the extent or nature of
impact to a critical area or its buffer occurs, beyond that which has
occurred prior to the effective date of this section.
(b) If the proposed activity meets any of the listed allowed uses, including any
BMP and/or restoration requirements, completion of a critical area
checklist or further Critical Area Review is not required.
(4) Critical Area Review:
(a) The City of Pasco shall complete a Critical Area Review prior to granting
any shoreline permit approval for a development or other alteration on a
site that is found to likely include, or be adjacent to, or have significant
impact upon one or more critical areas, unless otherwise provided in this
section. As part of this review, the Shoreline Administrator shall verify the
information submitted by the applicant, and:
(i) Confirm the extent, nature, and type of any critical areas identified •
and evaluate any required Critical Area Detailed Study;
(ii) Determine whether the development proposal conforms to the
purposes and performance standards of this section;
(iii) Assess impacts on the critical area from the activities and uses
proposed and determine whether any proposed alterations to, or
impacts upon, critical areas are necessary and unavoidable in order
to meet the objectives of the proposal; and
(iv) Determine if any required mitigation plans proposed by the
applicant are sufficient to protect the critical area and public
health, safety, and welfare concerns consistent with the goals,
purposes, objectives, and requirements of this section.
(b) The applicant shall be responsible for the initiation, preparation,
submission, and expense of all required assessments, studies, plans,
reconnaissance, and other work in support of the application. The
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QE1'/0no2a & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
114
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 324 of 412
J1me 201 li Februa ryQeeember 2023:.:!
applicant shall provide the City with digital copies and paper copies of
reports/studies and maps prepared for the reports/studies, including all
geotechnical studies and mapping.
(5) Minimum Standards. Any proposed activity shall be conditioned as necessary to
mitigate impacts to critical areas to ensure no net Joss of ecological function and
conform to the performance standards required by this section and
PMC 29.01.230, Environmental Protection.
(6) Concurrent Requirements. Lands characterized by one or more critical area
feature may also be subject to other regulations established by this section due
to overlap or multiple functions of some critical areas . In the event of conflict
between regulations, the most restrictive regulations shall apply.
(7) Critical Area Checklist:
(a) For any proposed activity not found to be exempt under PMC 29.01.510
(3), or PMC 29.01. 770, Exemptions from Shoreline Substantial
Development Permits, the applicant shall complete a critical area checklist
on forms provided by the City. The checklist must be submitted to the
Shoreline Administrator prior to consideration of any permit request that
requires a Critical Area Review, as described in PMC 29.01.510, General
Provisions .
(b) Following receipt of the checklist, the Shoreline Administrator will
conduct a review to determine whether there are any critical area
indicators present that may be impacted by the proposal.
(8) Initial Determination:
(a) If the Shoreline Administrator determines the site potentially includes, or
is adjacent to critical areas, or the proposed project could have significant
adverse impacts on critical areas, the Shoreline Administrator shall notify
the applicant that a Critical Area Detailed Study is required for each of the
indicated critical area types.
(b) If the review of the checklist and critical area resources do not indicate
that critical areas are included or adjacent to the aeti~•ity, ofactivity or
could suffer probable significant adverse impacts from the activity, then
the Shoreline Administrator shall rule that the Critical Area Review is
complete. The determination shall be noted on the checklist.
(c) The applicant shall acknowledge in writing that a determination regarding
the apparent absence of one or more critical areas by the Shoreline
Administrator is not intended to be an expert certification regarding the
presence of critical areas and the determination is subject to possible
reconsideration and reopening if new information is received. If the
applicant wants greater assurance of the accuracy of the Critical Area
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anr;tier QlYVOnei!a & Asseeriales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
115
Page 325 of 412
June 201 li FebruaryDesemller 202~
Review determination, the applicant may hire a qualified consultant to
provide such assurances.
(9) Waivers from Critical Area Detailed Study Requirements:
(a) The Shoreline Administrator may waive the requirement for a
Critical Area Detailed Study if there is substantial evidence that:
(i) There will be no alteration of the critical areas or required buffer; •
(ii) The development proposal will not impact the critical area in a
manner contrary to the purpose, intent and requirements of this
section; and
(iii) The performance standards required by this section will be met.
(b) In making the determination, the Shoreline Administrator may use any of
the most current scientific information and the Critical Area reference
maps and/or inventories identified in PMC 29.01 .500 (6).
(c) Notice of the findings substantiating the waiver will be attached to the
permit and filed with the application records.
(10) Critical Area Detailed Studies:
(a) Preliminary Reconnaissance. If a Critical Area Detailed Study is
determined to be necessary, then a data review and field reconnaissance
shall be performed by a qualified consultant for that type of critical area. If
the Detailed Study reveals no critical area is present, then a statement of
this finding along with supporting evidence shall be prepared by the
consultant and submitted to the City. An approved finding of the lack of a
critical area shall satisfy all of the requirements for a Detailed Study.
(b) Minimum Requirements. If the data review and field reconnaissance
reveals that a critical area is present, then a complete Detailed Study shall
be prepared by the applicant and submitted to the City. At a minimum, a
Critical Area Detailed Study shall comply with the specific criteria in
PMC 29.01 .520 through PMC 29.01 .560, and clearly document:
(i) The boundary and extent of the critical area;
(ii) The existing function, value, and/or hazard associated with the
critical area;
(iii) The probable impact upon the function, value, and/or hazard
associated with the critical area from the project as proposed; and
(iv) A mitigation plan including the items in PMC 29.01.510 (13).
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARG/:Jer QEl'/ORe<Ea & Associates White Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
116
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 326 of 412
June 2015 Februar yDecember 20232
(c) Limitations to Study Area. If the applicant, together with assistance from
the City, cannot obtain permission for access to properties adjacent to the
project area, then the Critical Area Detailed Study may be limited
accordingly.
(d) Preparation and Determination of Completeness. The Critical Area
Detailed Study shall be prepared by a qualified consultant for the type of
critical area or areas involved. The qualified consultant may consult with
the Shoreline Administrator prior to or during preparation of the Critical
Area Detailed Study to obtain City approval of modifications to the
contents of the study where, in the judgment of the qualified consultant,
more or less information is required to adequately address the critical area
impacts and required mitigation.
If the Critical Area Detailed Study is found to be incomplete, the applicant shall
be notified and the Critical Area Review process shall be suspended pending
correction of the inadequacies. Upon receipt of a complete Critical Area Detailed
Study a final determination is to be rendered.
(I I) Final Determination. Following submission of a completed Detailed Study, the
Shoreline Administrator will review the Detailed Study and make a
determination, based on the Critical Area Detailed Study and any other
available and appropriate materials. The Shoreline Administrator's
determination will address the adequacy of the project, as proposed, to mitigate
any effects it may have on critical areas that are included within or adjacent to
the project site. The Shoreline Administrator may elect to request assistance
from state resource agency staff if necessary. In addition, the Shoreline
Administrator will assess the adequacy of the project proposal's compliance
with the applicable performance standards and this SMP. Notice of this
determination shall be attached to the permit and the Critical Area Review shall
be completed.
(a) A Favorable Determination. A determination that the project proposal
adequately mitigates its impacts on the critical areas and complies with the
applicable performance standards satisfies the provisions of this Title only.
It should not be construed as endorsement or approval of the original or
any subsequent permit applications.
(b) An Unfavorable Determination. When a project proposal is found to not
adequately mitigate its impacts on the critical areas and/or not comply
with applicable performance standards, the Shoreline Administrator shall
prepare written notice of the reasons for the finding of non-compliance.
Such notice shall identify the critical area impacted and the nature of the
impact.
Following notice of a determination from the Critical Area Review that the
proposed activity does not adequately mitigate its impacts on the critical areas
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ansher Ql£PJOneza & AsseGiates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
117
Page 327 of 412
June 2015 February 0eGemher 20232
and/or does not comply with applicable performance standards, the applicant may
request consideration of a revised mitigation plan. If the revision is found to be
substantial and relevant to the Critical Area Review, the Shoreline Administrator
may re-open the Critical Area Review and make a new determination based on
this revised mitigation plan.
(12) Completion of the Critical Area Review. Ifat any time prior to completion of
the public input process on associated permits or approvals, the City receives
new evidence that a critical area may be included in, adjacent to, or significantly
impacted by the proposed activity, then the City shall re-open the
Critical Area Review process and shall require whatever level of
Critical Area Review and mitigation as indicated by the evidence. Once the
public input process on all associated permits or approvals is completed and the
record is closed, then the City's determination regarding critical areas shall be
final, unless appeal is filed as per PMC 29.01.810, Appeals.
(13) Mitigation Standards:
(a) All proposed critical area alterations shall include mitigation sufficient to
maintain the function and values of the critical area or to prevent risk from
a hazard posed by a critical area. Mitigation of one critical area impact
should not result in unmitigated impacts to another critical area.
Mitigation includes avoiding, minimizing, or compensating for adverse
impacts to critical areas or their buffers. The preferred sequence of
mitigation is defined in PMC 29.01 .230, Environmental Protection.
(b) Possible mitigation techniques include, but are not limited to, buffers,
setbacks, limits on clearing and grading, creation of artificial wetlands,
streambank stabilization, modified construction methods, and BMPs for
erosion control and maintenance of water quality.
(c) All proposed mitigation shall be documented in a mitigation plan included
as an element of the Critical Area Detailed Study. The mitigation plan
shall include a description of the following:
(i) The proposed mitigation;
(ii) How the proposed mitigation will maintain the critical area
function, any ongoing monitoring and/or inspection that may be
required to ensure the adequacy of the proposed mitigation, and an
evaluation of the anticipated effectiveness of the proposed
mitigation;
(iii) Any remedial measures that may be required, depending on the
outcome of that ongoing monitoring and/or inspection;
(iv) Any required critical expertise necessary to install, monitor, or
inspect the proposed mitigation; and
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARotlor QEl'/ORoZca & Assoo.'alos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
118
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 328 of 412
JuAe 201 liFebrua ryDesemller 20232
(v) Any bonding or other security required to insure performance
and/or maintenance of the proposed mitigation.
(14) Buffers:
(a) Buffers have, in some cases, been determined to be necessary to protect
critical areas and their functions. Where specific buffers are identified,
those buffers are deemed "required" or "standard" buffers. See Table
29.01.210 (2) for riparian buffers and PMC 29.01.520 for wed.and buffers.
(i) Except as otherwise specified herein, required buffers shall be
retained in their pre-existing condition. If a project does not
propose any alteration ofbuffers or of the associated critical area,
then subject to the following provision, no additional mitigation
will be required to protect the critical area. Additional mitigation
beyond the required buffer shall be required if the
Shoreline Administrator finds that, based on unique features of the
critical area or its buffer or of the proposed activity, the required
buffers will not adequately protect the function of the critical area
or prevent risk of hazard from the critical area and that additional
mitigation or buffering is required to protect the critical area
function or to prevent risk of hazard from the critical area.
(ii) The buffer shall be marked prior to any site alteration, and
boundary markers shall be visible, durable, and permanently
affixed to the ground. The boundary markers shall remain until all
activity is completed and a final site inspection is completed.
(iii) An 8-foot-minimum setback shall be required from the buffer area
for any construction of impervious surface area greater
120 square feet. Clearing, grading, and filling within this setback
shall only be allowed when the applicant can demonstrate that
vegetation within the buffer will not be damaged .
(iv) Where temporary buffer disturbance or alteration bas or will occur
in conjunction with regulated activities , revegetation with
appropriate native vegetation shall be required and completed 1
month before the end of the growing season.
(v) Normal non-destructive pruning and trimming of vegetation for
maintenance purposes, or thinning of limbs of individual trees to
provide a view corridor, shall not be subject to these buffer
requirements . Enhancement of a view corridor shall not be
construed to mean excessive removal of trees or vegetation that
impairs views. See also PMC 29.01 .240, Shoreline Vegetation
Conservation.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anellor Q~D/Onei!'a & Asses.'a/esWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
119
Formatted: Indent : Left: 1.5"
Page 329 of 412
J11ne 2015 Februa ry gesember 20233
(b) If the applicant proposes to reduce required buffers or to alter the required
buffer, then the applicant shall demonstrate why such buffer modification,
together with any alternative mitigation proposed in the Critical Area
Detailed Study, is sufficient to protect the critical area function or to
prevent risk of hazard from the critical area.
( c) The Critical Area Detailed Study shall make adequate provision for
long-term buffer protection. Periodic inspection of the buffers may be
required if deemed to ensure long-term buffer protection.
( 15) Bonding. The Shoreline Administrator shall have the discretion to require a
bond, which will ensure compliance with the mitigation plan if activity related
to the protection of the critical area(s) (e.g., monitoring or maintenance) or
construction is scheduled to take place after the issuance of the City's permit.
The bond shall be in the form of a surety bond, performance bond, assignment
of savings account, or an irrevocable standby letter of credit guaranteed by a
financial institution with terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney.
The bond shall be in the amount of 125% of the estimated cost of the
uncompleted actions or construction or the estimated cost of restoring the
function and values of the critical area that are at risk, whichever is higher. The
term of the bond shall be 2 years, or until the additional activity or construction
has been completed and passed the necessary inspections, whichever is longer.
( 16) Incentives. The following incentives are intended to minimize the burden to
individual property owners from application of the provisions of this section:
(a) Open Space. Any property owner on whose property a critical area or its
associated buffer is located and who proposes to put the critical area and
buffer in a separate tract may apply for current use property tax
assessment on that separate tract through Franklin County, pursuant to
RCW 84.34.
(b) Conservation Easement. Any person whose property contains an identified
critical area or its associated buffer may place a conservation easement
over that portion of the property by naming a beneficiary under
RCW 64.04.130 as beneficiary of the conservation easement. This
conservation easement may be in lieu of a separate critical areas tract that
qualifies for open-space tax assessment described in PMC 29.01.510 (16).
The purpose of the easement shall be to preserve, protect, maintain,
restore, and limit future use of the property affected. The terms of the
conservation easement may include prohibitions or restrictions on access.
( 17) Critical Areas Mapping. The approximate location and extent of critical areas in
the City of Pasco may include the following:
(a) Critical areas shown on the critical areas map adopted as a part of the
Comprehensive Plan.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.ReRer QEAIOReZca & Assesiates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
120
Page 330 of 412
J1me 2015 Februa ry Desemller 20232
(b) Other mapping resources provided in PMC 29.01 .500 (6).
Mapping resources are to be used only as guides to alert the user to the possible
distribution, location, and extent of critical areas. Mapping shall be utilized as a
source of generalized information and shall not be considered as regulatory
standards or substitute for site-specific assessments. The actual type, extent, and
boundaries of critical areas shall be determined in the field by a qualified
specialist according to the procedures, definitions, and criteria established in this
section.
29.01.520 Wetlands
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to promote public health and welfare by
instituting local measures to preserve naturally occurring wetlands that exist in
the City's shoreline jurisdiction for their associated value. These areas may
serve a variety of vital functions, including, but not limited to, flood storage and
conveyance, water quality protection, recharge and discharge areas for
groundwater, erosion control, sediment control, fish and wildlife habitat,
recreation, education, and scientific research.
(2) Wetland Designation. Under SMP Article V, Critical Areas, wetlands shall be
designated in accordance with the definitions, methods, and standards set forth
in the approved 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual, as amended and
its regional applicable regional supplements, as amended (The Arid West Final
Regional Supplement was last updated in 2008 at time ofSMP adoption). All
areas within the City of Pasco meeting the criteria identified in this delineation
manual, regardless of whether or not these areas have been formally identified
as wetlands, are hereby designated as wetland critical areas and are subject to
the provisions of SMP Article V, Critical Areas.
(3) Wetland Rating (Classification):
(a) The wetlands rating system is intended to differentiate between wetlands
based on their sensitivity to disturbance, rarity, irreplaceability, and the
functions and values they provide. A general description of wetland
categories and the rationale for each category is provided in
PMC 29.01.080, Definitions (see "Wetland Categories").
(b) Wetlands shall be rated (classified) as either Category I, Category II,
Category III, or Category N according to the criteria listed in this section.
This rating system is based on the Washington Department of Ecology's
Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Eastern Washington-
Ecology Publication #14-06-030 (October 2014), as amended. The most
current copy of this document should be used in classifying wetlands and
developing wetland mitigation plans.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ammer Qfy'JOnora & /\ssocia!es White Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
121
Page 331 of 412
JYRO 2011i February Dosemeor 20232-
(4) Wetland Indicators. The following indicators of wetland presence shall be used
by the Shoreline Administrator to determine if a Wetland Detailed Study is
needed:
(a) Listing in the City's Critical Areas Mapping resources as a wetland or
resources listed in PMC 29.01.500 (6);
(b) Documentation, through references state or federal handbooks and or
reports by qualified experts;
(c) A finding by a qualified wetland biologist that an appropriate hydrologic,
soil, and/or vegetation regime indicative of a wetland exists; or
( d) A reasonable belief by the Shoreline Administrator that a wetland may
exist, supported by a site visit and subsequent consultation with a qualified
wetland biologist.
( 5) Wetland Detailed Study. Requirements. If a Wetland Detailed Study is required,
it shall meet the following requirements in addition to the Basic Requirements
identified in PMC 29.01.510 (10):
(a) The Wetland Detailed Study shall be completed by a qualified wetlands
biologist.
(b) The extent and boundaries of any wetlands shall be determined in
accordance with the methodology specified under PMC 29.01.520 (2). The
boundary shall be surveyed and mapped at a scale no smaller than 1 inch
equals 200 feet.
( c) A wetland community description and wetland classification shall be
completed, consistent with the requirements of PMC 29.01.520 (2).
(d) A written values and functions assessment shall be completed and address
site hydrology (source of water in the system, water quality, flood and
stream flow attenuation, seasonality of presence of water, if applicable),
soils, vegetation, fish and wildlife habitat, recreation, and aesthetics.
(e) The site plan for the proposed activity shall be mapped at the same scale
as the wetland map, showing the extent of the proposed activity in
relationship to the surveyed wetland, including a detailed narrative
describing the project, its relationship to the wetland, and its potential
impact on the wetland.
(f) The proposed mitigation plan shall follow the general mitigation plan
requirements described in PMC 29.01.510 (13), and address how the
activity has been mitigated to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to
wetlands. The Wetland Mitigation in Washington State-Part 2:
Developing Mitigation Plans, Department of Ecology
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor Qe/lJOne:l!a & /'.ssoc.'alos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
122
Page 332 of 412
June :.il01 liFebrua ryDecember 2023,:.i!
Publication# 06-06-01 lb, March 2006 (or any succeeding documents)
should be used as a basis for mitigation.
(6) Wetland Detailed Study Exemptions. In addition to activities exempted in
PMC 29.01.510 (3) and PMC 29.01.770, the following activities shall not
require a Wetland Detailed Study, provided they are conducted using accepted
BMPs as determined by the Shoreline Administrator:
(a) Conservation or preservation of soil, water, vegetation, fish, or other
wildlife.
(7) Basic Wetland Requirement. A regulated wetland or its required buffer can only
be altered if the Wetland Detailed Study shows that:
(a) The proposed alteration does not degrade the quantitative and qualitative
functions of the wetland and results in not net loss of ecological function,
or
(b) Any degradation can be adequately mitigated to protect the wetland
function . Any proposed alteration approved pursuant to this section shall
include mitigation necessary to mitigate the impacts of the proposed
alteration on the wetland as described in this section and
PMC 29.01.510 (13).
(8) Required Buffers :
(a) Buffer Requirements. The following buffers shall be required for wetlands
based on the rating of the wetland as outlined in PMC 29.01 .520 (3) and
land-use inte nsity described in Table 29.01 .520 (8)(b).
(i) Any wetland created, restored, or enhanced as compensation for
approved wetland alterations shall also include the standard buffer
required for the category of the created, restored, or enhanced
wetland.
Table 29.01 .520 (8)(a): Wetland Buffer Width Requirements
Buffer Width by Impact of Other Measures
Wetland Characteristics Proposed Land Use Recommended for Protection
Category IV Wetlands (For wetlands scoring less than 16 points for all functions)
Low-25 feet No recommendations at this Score for all three basic functions is less Moderate -40 feet
than 16 points High -50 feet
Category Ill Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 16 to 18 points or more for all functions)
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ansh0r Qel'/On0;9 & Asseoiatas White Bluffs Consulting
time
Draft
123
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 333 of 412
JuRe 201 li February [)eeember 20232-
Buffer Width by Impact of Other Measures
Wetland Characteristics Proposed Land Use Recommended for Protection
Moderate level of function for habitat Low-75 feet
(score for habitat 5 to 7 points) Moderate -110 feet No recommendations at this
*If wetland scores 8 to 9 habitat points, High -150 feet time
use Category II buffers
Low-40 feet No recommendations at this
Score habitat for 3 to 4 points Moderate -60 feet
High -80 feet time
Category II Wetlands {For wetlands scoring 19 to 21 points or more for all functions or having the "Special
Characteristics" identified in the rating system)
Low -100 feet
High level of function for habitat (score Moderate -150 feet
for habitat 8 to 9 points) High -200 feet
Moderate level of function for habitat
Low-75 feet
Moderate -110 feet
(score for habitat 5 to 7 points) High -150 feet
High level of function for water quality Low-50feet
improvement and low for habitat (score Moderate -75 feet
for water quality 8 to 9 points; habitat High -100 feet
less than 5 points)
Buffer width to be based on
Riparian forest score for habitat functions or
water quality functions
Low-50feet
Not meeting above characteristic Moderate -75 feet
High -100 feet
Low -100 feet
Moderate -150 feet
High -200 feet
Or develop a regional plan to
protect the most important
Vernal pool vernal pool complexes; buffers
of vernal pools outside
protection zones can then be
reduced to:
Low-40feet
Moderate -60 feet
High -80 feet
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.RGROr QEl!/OReZE & A668GiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Maintain connections to other
habitat areas
No recommendations at this
time
No additional surface
discharges of untreated runoff
Riparian forest wetlands need
to be protected at a watershed
or subbasin scale
Other protection based on
needs to protect habitat and
water quality functions
No recommendations at this
time
No intensive grazing or tilling
of wetland
Draft
124
Page 334 of 412
J1rne 2015 Februa ryDeoember 20232
Buffer Width by Impact of Other Measures
Wetland Characteristics Proposed Land Use Recommended for Protection
Category I Wetlands (For wetlands scoring 22 points or more for all functions or having the "Special
Characteristics" identified in the rating system)
No additional surface
discharges to wetland or its
Low -125 feet tributaries
Wetlands of High Conservation Value Moderate-190 feet No septic systems within 300
High -250 feet feet of wetland
Restore degraded parts of
buffer
Low -100 feet
Restore degraded parts of
High level of function for habitat (score Moderate -150 feet buffer
for habitat 8 to 9 points) High -200 feet Maintain connections to other
habitat areas
Low-75 feet No recommendations at this Moderate level of function for habitat Moderate -110 feet
(score for habitat 5 to 7 points) High -150 feet
time
High level of function for water quality Low-50feet
No additional surface
improvement {8 to 9 points) and low for Moderate -75 feet discharges of untreated runoff
habitat {less than 5 points) High -100 feet
Low-50 feet No recommendations at this
Not meeting above characteristics Moderate -75 feet time
High -100 feet
Note:
See Table 29.01.520 {8){b) in this section, or as amended by Ecology, for types of land uses that can result in low,
moderate, and high impacts to wetlands.
Level of
Impact from
Proposed
<:llaRge iR
Land Use
High
(b) The Land Use Intensity table describes the types of proposed land use that
can result in high, moderate, and low levels of impacts to adjacent
wetlands.
Table 29.01.520 (8)(b): Land Use Intensity Table
Types of Land Use 8asell eR <:emmeR ol!eRiRg 9esigRaliBRS
• Commercial
• Urban . Industrial
• Institutional . Re~ail salesMixs:i;l-u~s: develogments
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
125 AnGhor QEAiQnoza & Associa/os White Bluffs Consulting
Page 335 of 412
J11ne 2011i February gesember 20232
Level of
Impact from
Proposed
,a:ianee in
Land Use Types of Land Use llasell BR c;emmeR ZeRiRg gesigna,iens . Residential (more than one unit/acre)
• GBRYeFSiBR ta RijlR iRteRsit•r agriEHltHFe {Elairies, RHFSeries, greeRRBHSes, grewiRg
aREI Raf><estiRg EFBPS reqHiFiRg aRRHal tilliRg aRII raisiRg aREI maiRtaiRiRg aRimals,
et€,}
• MigR iRteRsity FeereatiBR (e.g., gelf EBHFSes a REI sail fie Ills)
• I-IBbb•t farmsRoads: federal and state hig hwa)I S including on ram (!S and exits,
state routes, and other roads associated with high-im(!act land uses
• Railroads
• Al!riculture with hi gh-intensity activities I dairies, nurseries, g reenhouses, g rowing
and harvesting cro n s re g uiring annual tilling. raising and maintaining animals, etc.
• O(len l recreational s(!ace with hig h-intensit~ uses jgQlf courses, ball fielg~, !i:1,-1 . Solar farms I utili!Y scale ]
_•_Residential (1 unit/acre or less)
• Roads: Forest Service roads and roads associated with moderate im12act land uses . O(!enl recreational s(!ace with moderate-intensit)l uses [12 arks with gaved trails or
Qla)lgrounds, biking, jogging, etc.)
• Agriculture with moderate-intensit·r uses [orchards, ha :11 fields, lieht or rotational
grazing, etc.)
Moderate MBElerate iRteRsit•t epeR spaee {e.g., parl,s witR bil,iRg a REI jeggiRgj •
• Pa•;eel EIFiYeways a REI graYel EIFi"'eways ser•iRg tRree er mere resiEleRees
• PaYeEI trails
_•_Utility corridor or right-of-way !!..._S5Rafe d by one or more5E!YeFal utilities and
including access/maintenance . Wind farlTlfWG
• Ferestry {EHttiRg sf trees BRl•,•l
• bew iRteRsity epeR spaee (e.g., Ril,iR!½; birel ·«ateRiRg, a REI preser«atieR sf RatHral
resBureesj
• YRpa•,eEI trails
_•_Ytilit•t EBFFiEIBF witRBUt a RlaiRteRaREe FBaEI aREI little BF RB >;egetatiBR
R1aRagemeRt
Low • Natural resource lands !forestrv/silviculture-cuttins of trees onllr'., not land
clearing and removing stum(!sl
• Oeenl recreational s(!ace with low-intensit)l uses I unQaved trails, hiking,
birdwatching, etc.]
• !,!tility CQrriQQr withQut a maint~nance rQad and little or no vegetation
management
• Cell tower
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
126 Anstior QIY'.'One~a & Asses.'atasWhite Bluffs Consulting
Page 336 of 412
JuRe 2015 February Cecember 20232
( c) Measuring Buffer Dimensions. Wetland buffers shall be measured
horizontally in a landward direction from the delineated wetland edge.
(d) Wetlands Adjacent to Slopes. Where lands adjacent to a wetland display a
continuous slope of25% or greater, the buffer shall include such sloping
areas. Where the horizontal distance of the sloping area is greater than the
required standard buffer, the buffer shall be extended to a point 25 feet
beyond the top of the bank of the sloping area.
(9) Buffer Width Modifications:
(a) Administrative Buffer Width Averaging. The required buffer widths
established in this SMP may be modified by the Shoreline Administrator
for a development on existing legal lots ofrecord in place at the time of
adoption of this SMP.
(i) Buffer widths may be modified in accordance with the provisions •
of this section only where the applicant demonstrates all of the
following:
(A) Averaging is necessary to avoid an extraordinary hardship
to the applicant caused by circumstances peculiar to the
property;
(B) The designated buffer area contains variations in sensitivity
to ecological impacts due to existing physical
characteristics or the character of the buffer varies in slope,
soils, or vegetation;
(C) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is
no less than that contained within the standard buffer prior
to averaging;
(D) The minimum buffer width at its narrowest point shall not
be less than 165% of the required buffer width established
under this SMP; and
(E) The buffer width averaging does not result in a net loss of
ecological function.
(b) Wetland Buffer Reductions.
(i) For wetlands that score moderate or high for habitat function, the •
width of the buffer can be reduced if the following criteria are met:
(A) A relatively undisturbed vegetative corridor of at least
100 feet in width is protected between the wetland and any
other priority habitats; and
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
127 Anchor QEl'/Oneza & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 337 of 412
(ii)
JuRe 2011i FebruaryDesember 20232
(B) The protected area is preserved by means of easement,
covenant or other measure; and
(C) Measures identified in PMC 29.01.520 (9)(b)(ii)(A) are
taken to minimize the impact of any proposed land use.
For wetlands that score low for habitat function, the buffer width 4
can be reduced to that required for moderate land-use impacts by
applying the following measures to minimize the impacts of the
proposed land uses:
(A) Wetland buffers may be administratively modified based
on reducing the intensity of impacts from land uses. Buffer
widths required for high-intensity land uses may be reduced
to those required for moderate land use intensity under the
following conditions:
• Direct lights away from the wetland and buffer.
• Locate activities that that generate noise away from the
wetland and buffer.
• Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within
200 feet of a wetland.
• hnplement integrated pest-management programs.
• Infiltrate or treat, detain and disperse runoff into buffer.
• Post signs at the outer edge of the critical area or buffer
to clearly indicate the location of the critical area
according to the direction of the City.
• Plant buffer with native vegetation appropriate for the
region to create screens or barriers to noise, light, and
human intrusion, as well as to discourage domestic
animal intrusion.
• Use low-impact development where appropriate.
• Establish a permanent conservation easement to protect
the wetland and the associated buffer.
(I 0) Compensatory Mitigation. As a condition of any development permit or
approval, which results in on-site loss or degradation of regulated wetlands
and/or wetland buffers, the City may require the applicant to provide
compensatory mitigation to ensure no net loss of ecological function and to
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARcf::lor QENOm,za & Associatos White Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
128
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 338 of 412
J1rne ::!016 Februa ry i::>esember 2023::!
offset impacts resulting from the actions of the applicant. The following
standards shall apply:
(a) The mitigation shall be conducted on property that shall be protected and
managed to avoid further loss or degradation. The applicant shall provide
for long-term preservation of the mitigation area.
(b) Mitigation ratios shall be consistent with the following entitled
Washington State Department of Ecology manual; Wetland Mitigation in
Washington State, Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance (Version 2,+,
Publication #21-06-003Q€i Q€i QI l a,A pril 2021 Marsh 2QQ€i ) and Wetland
Mitigation in Washington State, Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans
(Version 1, Publication #06-06-01 lb, March 2006). See Table 29.01 .520
(13), Wetland Mitigation Ratios (for Eastern Washington).
(c) Mitigation shall follow an approved mitigation plan and reflect the
restoration/creation ratios specified above.
(d) The applicant shall enter in-to a wetland mitigation monitoring agreement
with the City as a condition of approval. The monitoring program will
continue for at least 8 years from the date of plant installation. Monitoring
will continue for 10 years where woody vegetation (forested or shrub
wetlands) is the intended result.
These communities take at least 8 years after planting to reach 80%
canopy closure. Reporting for a l 0-year monitoring period shall occur in
years l, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10. Monitoring in all instances shall be bonded.
Reporting results of the monitoring data to the City is the responsibility of
the applicant.
(e) Mitigation shall be completed prior to or concurrently with, wetland loss,
or, in the case ofan enforcement action, prior to continuation of the
activity by the applicant.
(f) On-site mitigation is generally preferred over off-site mitigation.
(g) Off-site mitigation allows replacement of wetlands away from the site on
which the wetland has been impacted by a regulated activity. Off-site
mitigation will be conducted in accordance with the restoration/creation
ratios described above and in Table 29.01.520 ( 13), Wetland Mitigation
Ratios (for Eastern Washington). Off-site mitigation shall occur within the
same drainage basin as the wetland loss occurs, provided that Category IV
wetlands may be replaced outside of the watershed if there is no
reasonable alternative. Off-site mitigation may be permitted where:
(i) On-site mitigation is not feasible due to hydrology, soils, or other ◄
factors.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
129 Am#Jor Ql;.A/OReza & Asseciales White Bluffs Consulting
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 339 of 412
J1rne 2015 Februa ry 0eseml!er 2023a
(ii) On-site mitigation is not practical due to probable adverse impacts
from surrounding land uses or would conflict with a federal, state,
or local public safety directive.
(iii) Potential functional values at the site of the proposed restoration
are greater than the lost wetland functional values.
(h) When the wetland to be altered is of a limited functional value and is
degraded, mitigation shall be of the wetland community types needed
most in the location of mitigation and those most likely to succeed with
the highest functional value possible.
(i) Except in the case of cooperative mitigation projects in selecting
mitigation sites, applicants shall pursue locations in the following order of
preference:
(i) Filled, drained, or cleared sites that were formerly wetlands and
where appropriate hydrology exists.
(ii) Upland sites, adjacent to wetlands, if the upland is significantly
disturbed and does not contain a mature forested or shrub
community of native species, and where the appropriate natural
hydrology exists.
U) Where out-of-kind replacement is accepted, greater restoration/creation
ratios may be required.
(k) Construction of mitigation projects shall be timed to reduce impacts to
existing wildlife and plants. Construction shall be timed to ensure grading
and soil movement occurs during the dry season, and planting of
vegetation shall be specifically timed to the needs of target species.
(11) Innovative Mitigation:
(a) One or more applicants, or an organization may undertake a mitigation
project together if it is demonstrated that all of the following
circumstances exist:
(i) Creation of one or several larger wetlands may be preferable to
many small wetlands;
(ii) The group demonstrates the organizational and fiscal capability to
act cooperatively;
(iii) The group demonstrates that long-term management of the
mitigation area will be provided; and
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGhor QE-l'iOR0Zca & A660Giato6 White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
130
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 340 of 412
J1mo 2016 Februa ryDosembor 202~
(iv) There is a clear potential for success of the proposed mitigation at
the identified mitigation site.
(b) Wetland mitigation and banking programs shall be consistent with the
provisions outlined in the Department of Ecology's publication Wetland
Mitigation in Washington State, Part I : Agency Policies and Guidance
(Version I, Publication #06-06-01 la, March 2006) and Wetland
Mitigation in Washington State, Part 2 : Developing Mitigation Plans
(Version I, Publication #06-06-0 I b , March 2006).
(i)
(ii)
Credits from a wetland mitigation bank may be approved for use as ◄
compensation for unavoidable impacts to wetlands when:
(A) The bank is certified under WAC 173-700;
(B) The Shoreline Administrator determines the wetland
mitigation bank provides appropriate compensation for the
authorized impacts; and
(C) The proposed use of credits is consistent with the terms and
conditions of the bank's certification.
Replacement ratios for projects using bank credits shall be
consistent with replacement ratios specified in the bank's
certification.
(iii) Credits from a certified wetland mitigation bank may be used to
compensate for impacts located within the service area specified in
the bank's certification. In some cases, the service area of the bank
may include portions of more than one adjacent drainage basin for
specific wetland functions .
(12) Mitigation Exceptions. Requirements for mitigation do not apply when a
wetland alteration is intended exclusively for the enhancement or restoration of
an existing regulated wetland, and the proposal will not result in a loss of
wetland function and valu e, subject to the following conditions:
(a) The enhancement or restoration project shall not be associated with a
development activity.
(b) A restoration plan shall be prepared and approved as described in
PMC 29.01.520 (12).
(13) Restoration . Restoration is required when a wetland or its buffer has been
altered in violation of SMP, Article V , Critical Areas. The following minimum
performance standards shall be met for the restoration of a wetland, provided
that if it can be demonstrated by the applicant that greater functional and habitat
values can be obtained, the se standards may be modified:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGJ:ier QEA/0Re2a & Ass@siates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
131
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 341 of 412
,hrne 201 li February Qesember 20232'
(a) The original wetland configuration should be replicated, including depth,
width, and length at the original location.
(b) The original soil types and configuration shall be replicated.
( c) The wetland, including buffer areas, shall be replanted with native
vegetation, which replicates the original species, sizes, and densities.
( d) The original functional values shall be restored, including water quality and
wildlife habitat functions.
(e) Required replacement ratios are shown in the Re-establishment or Creation
column of Table 29.01.520 (13), Wetland Mitigation Ratios (for Eastern
Washington).
(f) A restoration plan shall be prepared and approved prior to commencement
of restoration work. Such a plan shall be prepared by a qualified wetland
biologist and describe how the proposed actions meet the minimum
requirements described above. The Shoreline Administrator shall, at the
applicant's -expense, seek expert advice in determining the adequacy of the
Restoration Plan. Inadequate plans shall be returned to the applicant for
revision and resubmittal.
(14) Wetland mitigation ratios are provided in the Table 29.01.520 (13).
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.no/:ior Qfil'.lOne;ra & /1.ssooiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
132
Page 342 of 412
J1me 201 li FebruaryDeGemlJer 20232
Table 29.01.520 (13): Wetland Mitigation Ratios (for Eastern Washington)
Category af!GI ~
~ es&alllisllmeR& er
impacted Re-treaUeR aRII
~Wetland establishment Rehabilitation Preservatio~ Enhancement
~ or Creatio~. ~ allilitatieR 4 51 ~
All-C ategory IV 1.5:1 3:1
6:11:1 R/C aREl
6:1
~
All-C ategory 111 2:1 4:1
8:11:1 R/C aREl
~ 8:1
All-a#,ef. 12:11:1 R/C aRe 3:1 6:1 12:1
Category II 44-RH
Category I 16:11:1 R,'C aRe
Bases BR SEBFe 4:1 8:1 16:1 ~
fer flclREl;iSRS
w ~ CategBP( I ~Jet EBRSiEleFeB Rehai3ilitatiBR Case i3y Ease ~ ~" ef a ~Jatlclral
EBRSiEleFeEI
~" Meritage site MeFitage site
Notes:
1. These Fatiss a,e taasea eR the ass~mptisn that the Fehallilitatisn er enhancemeRt actieRs implemeRtes
FepFesent the a¥eFage segree sf imprevemeRt pessible feF the site. Prepesals ts implement maFe effective
,ehatailitatisn er enhancement actians may Fes~lt in a lsweF Fatis, while less effective aEtisns ma'( res~lt in a
higheF Fatis. The sistinEtisn taetween Fehatailitatian ana enhancement is net eleaF cut. lnsteas, rehabilitatian ans
enhancement aEtians span a eontin~~m. Prapssals that fall within the gra•f area lletween Fehatailitatian ans
enhancement will Fes~lt in a Fatia that lies bet.;een the Fatias far Fehaeilitatian ans the ratias fer enhancement.
2'. ~Jat~Fal Meritage sites, all,ali wetlans, and bags aFe cansiseFes iFFeplaceable wetlands becm1se H1ev perfeFFn
same funEtians that eannat be replaces thraugh campensatary mitigatian. IFApaEl;s ta such ,etlanss waula
the,efe,e result iR a net lass af saFAe flclnEtians na matter •.vhat l,ins af csmpensatian is prapasea.
'Ratios reflect the amount of com pensation:amount of im pact.
'The catego ry of im pacted wetland is based on scores for functions. Com pensation ratios in this table generall y do
not app ly when im Pacts involve a wetland whose cate gory is based on special characteristics. Com pensation ratios
and options for im pacts to these typ es of wetlands are discussed in Cha pters 6B.5.1 to 6B.5.8.
'If p roposing to combine re-estabfishment or creation with other methods of com pensation , see Cha pter 6B.4.2.
4AII proposed preservation sites need to meet the preservation criteria listed in Cha pter 5.2.3.1.
5 App licants Pro posin g preservation only or enhancement only should also provide a Credit-Debit analysis. The
Credit-Debit anal vsis uses the Credit-Debit Method and includes the followin g,: 1) Scorin g Form Isl for wetland (sj
im nacted l i.e., debits); 2 ) Scorin g Form !s1 for wetland (sl p ro posed as com pensation ji .e., credits I; 3 ) Debit
Worksheet(s!; 4J Credit Worksheetls \; ands \ Summa ry of Credits and Debits.
Reference:
Washington State Department of Ecology, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region 10, April 2021MarEh 2G96 . Wetland Mitigation in Washington State -Part 1: Agency
Policies and Guidance (Version l_1c). Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #21-06-00396 96 911a .
Olympia, Washington.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ansher QENOnow & /\ssosia/os White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
133
~ 1 Formatted Table
[&rmatted: Superscript
Page 343 of 412
June 2916 February Desemller 20232
E = Enhancement
R/C = Re-establishment or Creation
RH = Rehabilitation
29.01.530 Fish and Wildlife Habitat
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide a framework to evaluate the
development, design, and location of buildings to ensure critical fish and
wildlife habitat with the shoreline jurisdiction is preserved and protected, in
order to ensure no net loss of ecological function and avoid habitat
fragmentation. These regulations seek to protect critical habitat areas so
populations of endangered, threatened, and sensitive species are given
consideration during the shoreline development review process.
(2) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Designation and Classification Criteria:
(a) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall include the following:
Table 29.01.530 (2)(a): Criteria for Classification of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas
(1)
{2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Habitat Area Characteristic/Classification Source
Areas with which state or federally designated endangered, WDFW, USFWS (NOAA)
threatened, and sensitive species have a primary association
Naturally occurring under 20 acres in size and their submerged aquati c Ecology
beds that provide fish or wildlife habitat
Waters of the state classified as fish and wildlife habitats under the
Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A, and WAC 365-190-080(5)(c)(v) WDNR, Ecology, WDFW, affected
• Columbia River Indian tribes
• Snake River
State Natural Area Preserves and Natural Resource Conservation WDNR
Areas
Habitat areas of local importance as determined by resolution of the WDFW
City Council.
(b) All areas within the City of Pasco' s shoreline jurisdiction meeting one or
more of these criteria are hereby designated as critical areas and are subject
to the provisions of this section.
( c) Mapping information sources for identification of fish and wildlife habitat
conservation areas include, but are not limited to:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
134 ARGRor QEiVOReiEa & AssoGiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Page 344 of 412
J11Ae 2015 February Cesember 20232
(i) WDFW Priority Habitat and Species maps.
(ii) Wetlands mapped under the National Wetland Inventory by the
U.S. Department of Interior; USFWS.
(iii) WDFW/WDNR, Washington Rivers Inventory System maps.
(iv) Maps and reference documents in the City of Pasco SMP
Inventory, Analysis, and Characterization Report, as applicable.
(3) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Rating. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall be
rated as Primary or Secondary according to the criteria in this section.
Table 29.01.530 (3): Classification by Fish and Wildlife Areas
Habitat Area Classification Source
Primary habitats are those areas that are valuable to fish and wildlife and support a wide
variety of species due to an undisturbed nature, diversity of plant species, and structure,
presence of water, or size, location or seasonal importance and which meet any of the
following qualifying criteria:
(1) The documented presence of species listed by the
federal government or State of Washington as WDFW, USFWS (NOAA)
Primary Habitats endangered, threatened, or sensitive.
(2) Those rivers identified as "Shorelines of the State"
under the City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program, Ecology
and streams within the shoreline jurisdiction.
(3) Those wetlands identified as Category I Wetlands, PMC 29.01.520 (3)
as defined in this title. Wetland Rating (Classification)
Secondary habitats are those which are valuable to wildlife and support a wide variety of
Secondary Habitat
species due to: an undisturbed nature, diversity of plant species, structure, presence of
water, or size, location or seasonal importance but do not meet any of the qualifying
criteria listed in items 1 through 3 in the Primary Habitats above.
( 4) Determination ofN eed for Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Detailed Study:
(a) A Detailed Study shall be required for any activity that is within 200 feet
of a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area.
(b) Due to the sensitive nature of certain species, the applicant shall notify the
City if the proposed activity will occur within 660 feet (1/8 of a mile) of a
Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area; the City may then contact appropriate
agencies and determine if a -Detailed Study should be prepared, based on
the sensitivity of the site.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anehor QEIVOnoza & Assoe.iates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
135
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 345 of 412
J11Re 201 li February Desember 20232
(c) The Shoreline Administrator shall require a Detailed Study of a habitat
area if the following indicators are present:
(i) The area is listed in the City's Critical Areas Map as a Fish and
Wildlife Habitat Area;
(ii) Documentation exists that shows that any of the classification
criteria listed in PMC 29.01 .530 (3) are present, based on any of
the references listed in this section;
(iii) A qualified fish and wildlife biologist finds that habitat conditions
appropriate to meet one or more of the classification criteria listed
above in PMC 29.01 .530 (3) exist; or
(iv) The Shoreline Administrator possesses a reasonable belief that a
Fish and Wildlife Habitat may exist. Such reasonable belief shall
be supported by a site visit and subsequent consultation with a
qualified fish and wildlife biologist.
(5) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area Detailed Study Requirements. If a Fish and
Wildlife Habitat Area Detailed Study is required, it shall include and/or meet
the following requirements in addition to the Basic Requirements identified in
PMC 29.01.510 (10).
(a) The Detailed Study shall be completed by a qualified Fish and Wildlife
biologist with expertise in assessing the relevant species and habitats.
Evidence of qualifications shall be provided with the Detailed Study.
(b) The site plan and map submitted shall be of a scale no smaller than
1 inch= 200 feet. The site plan shall indicate all Fish and Wildlife Habitat
Critical Areas, as determined by the criteria in PMC 29.01 .530 (3), and
shall include the area within 200 feet of the subject property. The
applicant may prepare the site plan; however, it is subject to review by the
qualified fish and wildlife biologist. The extent and boundaries of the
habitat shall be determined by the qualified fish and wildlife biologist.
( c) A habitat description shall be included, including a habitat rating as
described in PMC 29.01.530 (3), and a statement of functions and values
providing information on the species in question and the associated plant
and animal communities. A complete list of species and special habitat
features shall be included.
( d) A regulatory analysis shall be included, including a discussion of any
federal, state, tribal, and/or local requirements or special management
recommendations developed specifically for species and/or habitats
located on the site.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARohor QEl'/ORoza & AssosialosWhile Bluffs Consulting
Draft
136
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 346 of 412
June 201 SFebrua ryDecember 20232
( e) The proposed mitigation plan shall address how the proposed development
activity has been mitigated to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the
habitat and shall follow the general mitigation plan requirements described
in PMC 29.01 .530 (13).
(f) A statement of management and maintenance practices shall be included,
including a discussion of ongoing maintenance practices that will ensure
protection of all fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas on-site after
the project has been completed.
(g) Habitat and Buffer Recommendation.
(i) Riparian habitat areas: For the protection of habitat along rivers,
the buffer widths provided in Table 29.01.210 (2), Shoreline
Development Standards Matrix apply.
(h) Habitats and species that have been identified as Priority Species or
Priority Habitats by the WDFW Priority Habitats and Species Program
should not be reduced and shall be preserved through regulation,
acquisition, incentives, and other techniques.
(6) Performance Standards Minimum Requirements. This section describes the
minimum performance standard requirements for habitat areas, including
riparian habitats, anadromous salmonids, and specific requirements for bald
eagle habitat areas.
(a) Riparian Habitats:
(i) Buffer Requirements. Native vegetation standard buffers for
activities occurring adjacent to streams within Fish and Wildlife
Habitat Areas shall be maintained. Buffer widths shall be based on
the extent of prior stream channel modification. Riparian buffers
are determined by whether or not a salmonid habitat is present.
(ii) The buffer distance from the OHWM are provided in
Table 29.01.210 (2), Shoreline Development Standards Matrix
apply.
(b) Bald Eagle Habitat. Bald eagle habitat shall be protected pursuant to the
Washington State Bald Eagle Protection Rules (WAC 232-12-292). A
Habitat Management Plan shall be developed by the applicant in
coordination with the WDFW whenever activities that alter habitat are
proposed near a verified nest territory or communal roost.
(c) Wetland Habitat. All habitat sites containing wetlands shall conform to the
wetland development performance standards set forth in PMC 29.01 .520,
Wetlands, and shall conform to the wetland mitigation and restoration
provisions set forth in PMC 29.01.520 (9) through (13).
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ansher QFEA/One'Z.a & AssesiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
137
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 347 of 412
Ju Re 201 !i FebruaryQesemeer 202:Ja
(d) Anadromous Salmonids:
(i)
(ii)
Activities, uses, and alterations proposed to be located in
waterbodies used by anadromous salmonids, or in areas that affect
such waterbodies, shall give special consideration to the
preservation and enhancement of anadromous salmonid habitat,
including, but not limited to, the following:
(A) Activities shall be timed to occur only during the allowable
work window, as designated by the WDFW;
(B) The activity is designed so that it will minimize the
degradation of the functions or values of the fish habitat or
other critical areas; and
(C) Any impact on the functions and values of the habitat
conservation area are mitigated in accordance with an
approved Detailed Study.
Structures that prevent the migration of anadromous salmonids
shall not be allowed in the portion of the waterbodies currently
used by salmonids. Fish bypass facilities shall be provided that
allow the upstream migration of adult fish and prevent juveniles
migrating downstream from being trapped or harmed.
(iii) Fills waterward of the OHWM, when authorized, shall minimize
the adverse impacts on anadromous salmonids and their habitat,
shall mitigate any unavoidable impacts, and shall only be allowed
for water-dependent uses or for uses that enable public access or
recreation for significant numbers of the public.
(7) Buffer Width Modifications:
(a) Administrative Buffer Width Averaging. The required buffer widths
established in this SMP may be modified by the Shoreline Administrator
for a development on existing legal lots of record in place at the time of
adoption of this SMP, in accordance with the provisions of this section
only where the applicant demonstrates all of the following:
(i) Averaging is necessary to avoid an extraordinary hardship to the
applicant caused by circumstances peculiar to the property;
(ii) The designated buffer area contains variations in sensitivity to
ecological impacts due to existing physical characteristics or the
character of the buffer varies in slope, soils, or vegetation;
(iii) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less
than that contained within the standard buffer prior to averaging;
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anohor QENOnoz,a & AssooiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
138
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 348 of 412
J1rne 2015 Februa ryDecember 20232
(iv) The minimum buffer width at its narrowest point shall not be Jess
than 165% of the required buffer width established under this
S:MP; and
(v) The buffer width averaging does not result in a net Joss of
ecological function.
(b) Exception for Lots Adjacent to Pre-Existing Development. The required
Riparian buffer width listed above shall not apply in cases where the
adjacent pre-existing development (vested prior to the effective date of
this section) does not meet these established standards. In such cases, the
buffer may be reduced by one-third the difference between the required
buffer and the larger of the two adjacent buffers.
Adjacency in this situation shall be defined as being within 50 feet of the
side property lines. If there is only clearing on one side of the proposed
activity within 50 feet of the side property line, then the buffer can be
reduced as described above.
( c) Shoreline Buffer Reductions. Shoreline buffers may be administratively
modified as outlined below:
(i)
(ii)
Where a legally established road or railway, or other type of
continuous development crosses or extends along a shoreline or
critical area buffer and is wider than 20 feet, the
Shoreline Administrator may approve a modification of the
minimum required buffer width to the waterward edge of the
improved continuous development provided the upland side of the
continuous development area:
(A) Does not provide additional protection of the shoreline
waterbody or stream; and
(B) Provides little (less than 20%) to no biological, geological,
or hydrological buffer functions relating to the riparian and
upland portions of the buffer.
Standard Buffer Reduction. Reductions ofup to 75% of the
standard required buffer may be approved if the applicant
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Shoreline Administrator that
a mitigation plan developed by a qualified professional pursuant to
PMC 29.01.510 (13) indicates that enhancing the buffer (by
removing invasive plants or impervious surfaces, planting native
vegetation, installing habitat features, or other means) will result in
a reduced buffer that functions at a higher level than the existing
standard buffer.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
139 Anchor QE,VOnoza & l'.ssocialos White Bluffs Consulting
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 349 of 412
Jyno .!111 li FobruaryDosomllor 202~
(8) Allowed uses in Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas and stream buffers:
(a) Roads, bridges, and utilities. Road, bridge, and utility maintenance, repair,
and construction may be permitted across a Fish and Wildlife Habitat
Conservation Area and/or buffers under the following conditions:
(i) It is demonstrated to the Shoreline Administrator that there are no ◄
alternative routes that can be reasonably used to achieve the
proposed development;
(ii) The activity will have minimum adverse impact to the Fish and
Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area;
(iii) The activity will not significantly degrade surface or groundwater;
and
(iv) The intrusion into the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area
and its buffers is fully mitigated to achieve no net loss of
ecological functions.
(b) Limited park or recreational access to a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area
and/or stream buffers, provided that all of the following are satisfied:
(i) The access is part of a public park or a recreational resort
development that is dependent on the access for its location and
recreational function;
(ii) The access is limited to the minimum necessary to accomplish the
recreational function; and
(iii) The intrusion is fully mitigated to achieve no net loss of ecological
functions.
(c) Low-impact uses and activities that are consistent with the purpose and
function of the stream setback and do not detract from its integrity.
Examples oflow-impact uses and activities include removal of noxious
vegetation and storm water management facilities such as grass-lined
swales.
(9) Additional Protection Measures:
(a) Temporary and permanent erosion and sedimentation controls shall be
provided to prevent the introduction of sediments or pollutants to
waterbodies or watercourses within the habitat area.
(b) Clearing and grading shall be limited to that necessary for establishment
of the use or development and shall be conducted to avoid significant
adverse impacts and minimize the alteration of the volume, rate, or
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGRor QE.6J0Reza & AssosiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
140
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 350 of 412
J1me 201 li Februa ryDesemller 2023'2
temperature of freshwater flows to or within the habitat area and any
buffer required by this section.
(c) The proposed development shall not discharge hazardous substances to the
habitat area that would have significant adverse impacts on that area.
(d) Stream flows shall be protected from changes to the normal flow,
temperature, turbidity, and discharge to the maximum extent practicable.
(e) Septic drainfields and any required replacement drainfield area shall be at
least 100 feet from the edge of any habitat area.
(f) Exceptions to the above protection standards may be allowed by the
Shoreline Administrator based on a special report prepared by a
Qualified Biological Professional that demonstrates that such exception
would not adversely impact the habitat system, functions, and values of
the habitat area.
(g) Activities may only be permitted in a stream or stream buffer if the
applicant can show that the proposed activity will not degrade the
functions and values of the stream, stream buffer, or other critical area.
(h) Stream Crossings. Stream crossings shall be minimized, but when
necessary, they shall conform to the applicable provisions of this S:MP and
other laws (see WDFW or Ecology).
(i) Stormwater conveyance facilities. Stormwater conveyance facilities may
be permitted, provided that they are only located in the buffer when no
practicable alternative exists outside the buffer. Stormwater facilities shall
be planted with native plantings where feasible to provide habitat, and/or
less intrusive facilities should be used.
(j) Floodway-dependent Structures. Floodway-dependent structures or
installations may be permitted within streams or their buffers if allowed or
approved by other ordinances or other agencies with jurisdiction. See
PMC 29.01 .550, Flood Hazard Areas, for more information on allowed
uses and activities within flood hazard areas.
(k) Trails. The criteria for alignment, construction, and maintenance of trails
within wetlands and their buffers shall apply to trails within stream
buffers. Outer buffer trails may not exceed 20 feet in width and may be
constructed with impermeable surface materials if on-site infiltration is
utilized.
(I) Utilities. The criteria for alignment, construction, and maintenance within
the wetland buffers and PMC 29.01.460, Utilities, shall apply to utility
corridors within stream buffers. In addition, corridors shall not be aligned
parallel with any stream channel unless the corridor is outside the buffer,
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ancher Ql£/VOneza & AssecialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
141
Page 351 of 412
Juno 2Q1S Fobruary Dosomllor 20232
and crossings shall be minimized. Installation shall be accomplished by
boring beneath the scour depth and hyporheic zone of the waterbody
where feasible. Crossings shall be contained within the existing footprint
of an existing or new road or utility crossing where possible. Otherwise,
crossings shall be at an angle greater than 60 degrees to the centerline of
the channel. The criteria for stream crossings shall also apply.
(m) Native vegetation landscaping schemes shall be provided that do not
require application of herbicides, pesticides, or fertilizer to maintain robust
growth.
(n) No net-effective impervious surfaces may be created in the outer buffer
area beyond what is otherwise permitted.
( o) No structures or related improvements, including buildings or decks, shall
be permitted within the stream buffer, except as otherwise allowed in
PMC 29.01.510, General Provisions, or in this SMP.
29.01.540 Aquifer Recharge Areas
(1) Purpose. The purpose and intent of this section is to safeguard groundwater
resources within the shoreline jurisdiction from hazardous substance and
hazardous waste pollution by controlling or abating future pollution from new
land uses or activities.
(2) Aquifer Recharge Area Designation Criteria:
(a) Aquifer recharge areas shall be classified as following:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARo"1or QEA/ORoca & Assooiatos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
142
Page 352 of 412
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
JuRe 201 liFebrua ,yDeGember 20232
Table 29.01.540 (2)(a): Designation of Aquifer Recharge Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area Characteristic/Designation Source
Wellhead Protection Areas pursuant to WAC 246-290 WA Department of Health,
US Environmental Protection Agency
Areas designated for special protection pursuant to a groundwater
management program, RCW 90.44, 90.48, and 90.54 and Ecology
WAC 173-100 and 173-200
Areas overlying unprotected aquifers. Such aquifers shall be
USGS, WDNR identified through any existing competent hydrogeologic study
Areas within identified unprotected aquifers but possessing the
following characteristics:
•
•
Slopes less than 15% WDFW
Coarse alluvium or sand and gravel in the soil profile and no
known impermeable layers
(b) Any project area located within 200 feet of an area meeting the aquifer
designation or soil classification criteria, or mapped as such, shall be
treated as if it is located within the mapped area.
(c) All areas within the City of Pasco meeting these criteria, regardless of the
presence or lack of an y formal identification as such, are hereby
designated as critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this Title.
(3) Aquifer Recharge Area Classification :
(a) Aquifer recharge areas are clas sified as high, moderate, or low
significance aquifer recharge areas according to the following criteria :
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
143 An01lor QfiNOnezca & AssoGialosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Page 353 of 412
June 2015 FebruaryDecember 20232.
Table 29.01.540 (3)(a): Classification of Aquifer Vulnerability
Vulnerability Classification Documentation and Data Sources
High Vulnerability High significance aquifer recharge areas are areas with slopes of less than
15% underlain by coarse alluvium or sand and gravel
Moderate significance aquifer recharge areas are:
Moderate Vulnerability
(1) Areas with slopes of less than 15% underlain by fine alluvium, silt,
clay, glacial till, or deposits from the electron mudflow
(2) Areas with slopes of 15% to 30% underlain by sand and gravel
Moderate significance aquifer recharge areas are:
Low Vu In era bility (1) Areas with slopes of 15% to 30% underlain by silt, clay, or glacial till
(2) Areas with slopes greater than 30%
(4) Determination ofNeed for Aquifer Recharge Detailed Study:
(a) The following information resources shall be utilized along with other
documentation where noted:
(i) Studies from the USGS.
(ii) City of Pasco Wastewater Facility Plan.
(iii) Soil Survey for Franklin County (Conservation District).
(b) Requirements for High Significance Aquifer Recharge Area. An Aquifer
Recharge Area Detailed Study shall be required for any activity occurring
on or adjacent to a site that is, or contains, a High Significance Aquifer
Recharge Area if the activity involves one or more of the following uses:
(i) Hazardous substance processing or handling;
(ii) Hazardous waste treatment and storage facility;
(iii) Disposal of on-site sewage for subdivisions, short plats, and
commercial and industrial sites; or
(iv) Landfills.
(5) Aquifer Recharge Area Detailed Study. When required as described in
PMC 29.01 .540 (4), an Aquifer Recharge Area Detailed Study shall meet the
following requirements:
(a) The Detailed Study shall be prepared by qualified consultant with
experience in preparing hydrogeologic assessments. Evidence of these
qualifications shall be provided with the Detailed Study.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
/\Rehor Q~lVOReca & Acceciatec White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
144
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 354 of 412
June 201 eFebruaryCeeemeer 20232
(b) The Detailed Study shall contain a map, of a scale no smaller than 1 inch=
200 feet, of the site and the extent of the High Significance Aquifer
Recharge Area as determined by the criteria in PMC 29.01 .540 (2).
(c) The Detailed Study shall contain a hydrogeologic assessment, including,
at a minimum:
(i) Information sources;
(ii) Geologic setting;
(iii) Background water quality;
(iv) Location of, and depth to, water tables;
(v) Recharge potential of the facility site;
(vi) Groundwater flow direction and gradient;
(vii) Currently available data on wells within 1,000 feet of the site;
(viii) Currently available data on springs within 1,000 feet of the site;
(ix) Surface water location and recharge potential;
(x) Water source supply to the activity ( e.g., high capacity well);
(xi) Any sampling schedules necessary;
(xii) Discussion of the effects of the proposed project on the
groundwater resource; and
(xiii) Other information as may be required by the Town.
(d) The Detailed Study shall include a mitigation plan detailing how the
activity will offset any impact on the resource and control risk of
contamination to the aquifer.
(6) Aquifer Recharge Area Detailed Study Special Exemptions. In addition to the
exemptions listed in PMC 29.01.510 (3) and 29.01,770, Exemptions for
Shoreline Substantial Development Permits, sewer lines and appurtenances shall
be exempt from the requirement to prepare an Aquifer Recharge Area Detailed
Study.
(7) Performance Standards Basic Requirements:
(a) Any activity listed in PMC 29.01 .540 ( 4)(b) may only be permitted in a
High Significance Aquifer Recharge Area if the Detailed Study documents
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anehor QE-A/Onem & Assoeiates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
145
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 355 of 412
JYRO 201 li February DeseFR~OF 2023:.i!
that the activity does not pose a threat to the aquifer system and the
proposed activity will not cause contaminants to enter the aquifer.
(b) All activities located in an Aquifer Recharge Area shall minimize the
creation of impervious surfaces to the extent practicable without creating a
greater risk to the aquifer recharge area.
(8) Storage Tanks. All Storage tanks located in an Aquifer Recharge Area must
conform to the following requirements. Ecology also regulates and authorizes
permits for underground storage tanks (WAC 173-360).
(a) Underground Tanks. All new underground storage facilities used or to be
used for the underground storage of hazardous substances or hazardous
wastes shall be designed and constructed so as to:
(i) Prevent releases due to corrosion or structural failure for the
operational life of the tank;
(ii) Be protected against corrosion, constructed of noncorrosive
material, steel clad with a noncorrosive material, or designed to
include a secondary containment system to prevent the release or
threatened release of any stored substances; and,
(iii) Use material in the construction or lining of the tank that is
compatible with the substance to be stored.
(b) Aboveground Tanks:
(i) No new aboveground storage facility or part thereof shall be
fabricated, constructed, installed, used, or maintained in any
manner which may allow the release of a hazardous substance to
the soil, groundwater, or surface waters within an
Aquifer Recharge Area.
(ii) No new aboveground tank or part thereof shall be fabricated,
constructed, installed, used, or maintained without having
constructed around or under it an impervious containment area
enclosing or underlying the tank or part thereof.
(iii) New aboveground tanks will require a secondary containment
system, either built into the tank structure or a dike system built
outside the tank, for all tanks located within an aquifer recharge
area.
29.01.550 Flood Hazard Areas
( 1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to promote the public health, safety, and
welfare of the community by recognizing potential hazards that may be caused
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QEl'JOne:zca & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
146
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 356 of 412
J11Re :IQ11i Februa ry()eGember 20232
by development in areas where severe flooding is anticipated to occur. The
intent of this section is to assist with minimizing public and private losses due to
flood hazards by avoiding development in hazard areas within the shoreline
jurisdiction and or implementing protective measures contained in this SMP.
(2) Classification. The following categories of frequently flooded areas are
established for the purposes of classification:
(a) Floodway. Floodways are defined as the channel of a stream and adjacent
land areas, which are required to carry and discharge flood waters or flood
flows of any river or stream associated with a regulatory flood .
(b) Special Flood Hazard Areas. The area adjoining the floodway, which is
subject to a 1 % or greater chance of flooding in any given year and
determined by the Federal Insurance Administration.
(c) Floodplain. The floodway and special flood hazard areas.
These flood areas have been delineated based on studies completed by FEMA for
the national Flood Insurance Program.
(3) Designation:
(a) All areas within the City meeting the frequently flooded designation
criteria of PMC 29.01 .550 (2) are hereby designated critical areas and are
subject to the provisions of this section.
(b) The approximate location and extent of frequently flooded areas are
shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) prepared for the City
of Pasco and Franklin County by FEMA, as part of the National Flood
Insurance Program.
(4) Management. Title 16 (Buildings and Construction) and Chapter 24.20
(Flood Hazard Protection) of the PMC regulate proposed activities in all areas
of special flood hazards . If allowed, any structures pennitted in the designated
flood areas are subject to the flood-proofing regulations provided in Title 16 and
Chapter 24 .20.
(5) Floodways. Special flood hazard areas established in this section are areas that
are extremely hazardous due to the velocity of flood waters, which carry debris,
potential projectiles, and erosion potential. The following provisions apply to
special flood hazard areas:
(a) Prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial
improvements, and other development unless certification by a registered
professional engineer or architect is provided demonstrating that
encroachments shall not result in an increase in flood levels during the
occurrence of the base flood discharge.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor Qe.6/0ne;;:a & A&&eciale& White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
147
Page 357 of 412
JuAe 2016 FebruaryDesem~er 2023a
(b) If PMC 29.01.550 (5)(a) is satisfied, all new construction and substantial
improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction
provisions of PMC 24.20.
29.01.560 Geologic Hazard Areas
(I) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to reduce the threats to public health and
safety posed by geologic hazards within the shoreline jurisdiction. The intent is
to reduce incompatible development in areas of significant geologic hazard.
Development incompatible with geologic hazards may not only place itself at
risk, but also may increase the hazard to surrounding development. Some
geologic hazards can be reduced or mitigated by engineering, design, or
modified construction or altering mining practices so risks to health and safety
are minimized. When technology cannot reduce the risks to acceptable levels,
development in the hazard area is best to be avoided.
(2) Geologic Hazard Area Designation. Geologic hazard areas within the City are
those areas that are susceptible to significant erosion, landslide, flood hazards,
seismic hazards, and surface mine collapse hazards. All areas within the City of
Pasco meeting the criteria described in PMC 29.01 .560 (3) for known or
suspected risk or unknown risk, regardless of the presence or lack of any formal
identification as such, are designated as critical areas and are subject to the
provisions of this section.
(a) Volcanic Hazards. The GMA requires that volcanic hazards be addressed
in local Critical Area Regulations. However, since no volcanic hazards
exist in the City area, no volcanic hazards regulations are needed.
(b) Flood Hazard Areas. Generally, areas subject to flood hazard conditions
are regulated by PMC 29.01.550 and the City of Pasco Flood Plain
regulations (PMC Title 24) which regulates those areas identified and
classified by the FEMA on their Flood Hazard Boundary/Flood Insurance
Rate Maps.
(3) Geologic Hazard Area Classification and Designation Criteria:
(a) Geologic hazard area classification criteria are listed in the table below,
along with the source agencies that provide the guidelines for
classification and designation:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anolwr QE,11/0nez,a & Aaaooiatoa White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
148
Page 358 of 412
J1me 201 li February[leGember 20232
Table 29.01.560 (3)(a): Criteria for Classification of Geologic Hazard Areas
Hazard Area Classification and Designation Source
(1) Erosion Hazard
(a) Areas with soil type possessing erosion hazard of
"moderate to severe," "severe," or "very severe." NRCS
Areas (Classification based on both soil type and slope)
(a) Areas with slopes of 30% or greater slope and with a
vertical relief of 10 or more feet; NRCS
(b) Areas with slopes steeper than 15% on hillsides
intersecting geologic contacts with a relatively
permeable sediment overlying a relatively NRCS
impermeable sediment or bedrock where springs or
groundwater seepage is present;
(c) Areas with slopes parallel or sub-parallel to planes of
weakness in subsurface materials (e.g., bedding NRCS
planes, joint systems, and fault planes);
(d) Areas with slopes having gradients steeper than 80% NRCS
subject to rockfall during seismic shaking;
(2) Landslide Hazard (e) Alluvial fans or canyon bottoms presently or
Areas potentially subject to inundation by debris flows or NRCS
catastrophic flooding;
(f) Areas that have shown movement during the
Holocene epoch or which are underlain or covered by NRCS
wastage debris of this epoch;
(g) Evidence of or risk from snow avalanches; NRCS
(h) A "severe" limitation for building site development NRCS due to slope conditions;
(i) Areas of historic failure such as areas designated as
quaternary slumps, earthflows, mudflows, lahars, or USGS, WDNR, or
landslides on maps or technical reports (e.g., other government
topographic or geologic maps, or other authorized agencies
documents).
(a) Areas potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream
(3) Flood Hazard Areas incision, stream bank erosion, and Undercutting by PMCTitle 24
wave action shall be addressed as a flood hazard
Note:
NRCS = U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service
(4) Geologic Hazard Area Rating Criteria. All areas within the City shall be
classified by the following risk categories for each geologic hazard type:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anoher Q~/Onei!.a & Asseoia/esWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
149
Page 359 of 412
dune 2916 FebruaryDesemlaer 20232
Table 29.01.560 (4): Rating of Geologic Hazard Risk
Risk Classification Documentation and Data Sources
Known or Suspected Risk Documentation or projection of the hazard by a qualified expert exists
No Risk Documentation or projection of the lack of a hazard by a qualified expert exists
Risk Unknown Data are not available to determine the presence or absence of a geologic hazard
(5) Determination ofNeed for Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study. A
Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study of a geologic hazard area shall be
required if the following indicators are present:
(a) If the project area is listed in the City of Pasco Critical Areas Map as
possessing either a Known or Suspected Risk for erosion, landslide, flood,
seismic, or mine hazard.
(b) If the project area is listed in the City of Pasco Critical Areas Map as
possessing an Unknown Risk for erosion, landslide, flood, seismic, or
mine hazard if any of the following are identified by the applicant or City:
(i) A qualified geologist finds that any of the following exist:
evidence of past significant events of the hazard in question on or
adjacent to the site; the presence of necessary and sufficient factors
for events of the hazard in question on or adjacent to the site; or
reasonable uncertainty conc=ing the hazard the potential for
significant risk to or from the proposed activity; or
(ii) The Shoreline Administrator possesses a reasonable belief that a
geologic hazard may exist. Such reasonable belief shall be
supported by a site visit and subsequent consultation with a
qualified geologist.
(6) Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study Requirements. The minimum
requirements for a Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study include the following
in addition to the Basic Requirements identified in PMC 29.01.510 (10):
(a) Basic Requirements. A Geologic Hazard Area Detailed Study shall meet
the following:
(i) The Detailed Study shall be prepared by a qualified professional
engineer or geologist. Evidence of qualifications shall be provided
with the Detailed Study.
(ii) A map, of a scale no smaller than 1 inch = 200 feet, of the site and
the extent of the geologic hazard area as determined by the criteria
in PMC 29.01 .560 (3).
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QEIVOnez,a & Assec.'ates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
150
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 360 of 412
J1rne 201 liFebrua ryDeceml:ler 20232
(iii) An assessment of the geologic characteristics and engineering
properties of the soils, sediments, and/or rock of the subject
property and potentially affected adjacent properties, and a review
of the site history regarding landslides, erosion, and prior grading.
The Study shall include a soils analysis consistent with the
accepted regional taxonomic classification system, and a
description of the vulnerability of the site to seismic events.
Documentation of data and methods shall be included.
(iv) A geotechnical analysis, including a detailed description of the
proposed project, its relationship to the geologic hazard(s), and its
potential impact upon the hazard area, the subject property and
affected adjacent properties shall be included.
(v) A mitigation plan, if appropriate, prepared by a professional
engineer or geologist under the supervision of a professional
engineer qualified to prepare a Detailed Study. The mitigation plan
shall include a discussion on how the project has been designed to
avoid and minimize the impacts discussed in the geotechnical
analysis (see mitigation standards provided in PMC 29.01.510
(13)). The plan shall make a recommendation for the minimum
building setbacks from any geologic hazard based on the
geotechnical analysis. The plan shall also address the potential
benefit of mitigation on the hazard area, the subject property, and
affected adjacent properties.
(vi) Where more than one geologic hazard exists within, adjacent to,
impacts, or is impacted by the activity site, then only one Detailed
Study is required to be completed to conduct a geologic hazard
Critical Area Review of the activity. The Critical Area Review
report shall meet all of the requirements of each critical area type,
~ may present a unified mitigation plan.
(vii) Where a valid geotechnical report has been prepared within the last
5 years for a specific site, and where the proposed land use activity
and surrounding site conditions are unchanged, said report may be
incorporated into the Detailed Study. The applicant shall submit a
geotechnical assessment detailing any changed environmental
conditions associated with the site.
(b) Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. In addition to the requirements of
PMC 29.01.560 (6)(a), an Erosion Hazard or Landslide Hazard Area
Detailed Study must also meet the following requirements:
(i) The map shall depict the height of slope, slope gradient, and cross •
section of the site. The site plan shall also include the location of
springs, seeps, or other surface expressions of groundwater. The
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
151 Am;hor QE-/'.'ORoza & Assooialos White Bluffs Consulting
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 361 of 412
JYRO 2016 FebruaryDosemher 20232
Site Plan shall also depict any evidence of surface or storm water
runoff.
(ii) A description ofload intensity, including surface and groundwater
conditions, public and private sewage disposal systems, fills and
excavations, and all structural development.
(iii) An estimate of slope stability and the effect construction and
placement of structures will have on the slope during the estimated
life of the structure.
(iv) An estimate of the bluff retreat rate that recognizes and reflects
potential catastrophic events such as seismic activity or a 100-year
storm event.
(v) An assessment describing the extent and type of vegetative cover.
(vi) The geotechnical analysis shall specifically include:
(A) Slope stability studies and opinion(s) of slope stability;
(B) Proposed angles of cut and fill slopes and site grading
requirements;
(C) Structural foundation requirements and estimated
foundation settlements;
(D) Soil compaction criteria;
(E) Proposed surface and subsurface drainage;
(F) Lateral earth pressures;
(G) Vulnerability of the site to erosion;
(H) Suitability of on-site soil for use as fill; and,
(I) Building limitations.
(vii) Mitigation proposals shall include the location and methods of
drainage, surface water management, locations, and methods of
erosion control, a vegetation management and/or restoration plan,
and/or other means for maintaining long-term stability of slopes.
( c) Flood Hazard Areas. Flood Hazard Areas are addressed through
PMC 29.01.550, Flood Hazard Areas, and the City of Pasco Floodplain
regulations (PMC Title 24). If evidence exists that the proposed
development area is subject to flood hazards that are not indicated on the
City's Flood Hazard Boundary Maps, and site characteristics do not
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARc/:lor QE,D/ORez;a & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
152
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 362 of 412
J1me 2015 FebruaryDecember 20232
warrant an Erosion or Landslide Hazard Detailed Study, the City may
require additional analysis and preparation of a mitigation plan to
determine if the site is suitable for development.
(d) Seismic Hazard Areas. In addition to the Basic Requirements
PMC 29.01.560 (6)(a)), a Detailed Study for a seismic hazard critical area
shall also meet the following requirements:
(i) The site map shall show all known and mapped faults in the project•
vicinity.
(ii) The geotechnical analysis shall include a complete discussion of
the potential impacts of seismic activity reasonably probable on the
site (e.g., forces generated and fault displacement).
(e) Mine Hazard Areas. In addition to the Basic Requirements
PMC 29.01.560 (6)(a), a Detailed Study for a mine hazard critical area
shall also meet the following requirements:
(i) The site plan shall delineate the existence of mine workings
adjacent to or abutting the site, or nearby mine workings, which
may impact the site; and
(ii) The geotechnical analysis shall include a discussion of the
potential for subsidence on the site.
(f) Volcanic Hazard Areas. The City is located in an area of minimal risk
from Volcanic Hazard Areas.
(7) Performance Standards Minimum Requirements. This section describes the
minimum performance standard requirements for Geologic Hazard Areas.
(a) Basic Requirements:
(i) Alteration of geologic hazard critical areas is permitted only if the ◄
development proposal can be designed so the hazard to the project
and any increase of hazard to adjacent property is eliminated or
mitigated, and the development proposal on the site is certified as
safe by a geotechnical engineer licensed in the State of
Washington.
(ii) All proposals involving excavations and placement of fills shall be
subject to structural review under Chapter 33, Site Work,
Demolition and Construction, of the most current International
Building Code.
(iii) Essential public facilities as defined by RCW 36.70A.200 shall not
be sited within designated geologic hazard areas.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anelwr QE-/1/0neza & Asseoiales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
153
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 363 of 412
J1rno 2Q16 Februacy Desember 202~
(b) Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing
landslide or erosion hazards shall also meet the following requirements:
(i)
(ii)
Alterations of the buffer and/or geologic hazard area may only
occur for activities meeting the following criteria:
(A) No reasonable alternative exists; and
(B) A geotechnical report is submitted and certifies that:
• The development will not significantly increase
surface-water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent
properties beyond pre-development conditions;
• The development will not decrease slope stability on
adjacent properties; and
• That such alterations will not adversely impact other
critical areas.
A temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, prepared in •
accordance with the requirements of the standard specification of
the City of Pasco.
(iii) A drainage plan for the collection, transport, treatment, discharge
and/or recycle of water in accordance with the standard
specification of the City of Pasco.
(iv) Surface drainage shall not be directed across the face of a landslide
hazard area (including riverine bluffs or ravines). If drainage must
be discharged from the hazard area into adjacent waters, it shall be
collected above the hazard and directed to the water by a tight line
drain and provided with an energy dissipating device at the point
of discharge.
(v) All infiltration systems, such as stormwater detention and retention
facilities, and curtain drains utilizing buried pipe or French drain,
are prohibited in landslide hazard areas and their buffers unless a
geotechnical report indicates such facilities or systems or the
failure of the same will not affect slope stability and the systems
are designed by a licensed civil engineer.
(vi) A minimum standard buffer width of30 feet shall be established
from the top, toe, and all edges of landslide and erosion hazard
areas. Existing native vegetation shall be maintained. The buffer
may be reduced to a minimum of 10 feet when an applicant
demonstrates the reduction will adequately protect the proposed
development, adjacent developments and uses, and the subject
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor Qli?A/Onota & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
154
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 364 of 412
June 2016 Februa ry 0esemller 2023~
critical area. The buffer may be increased by the
Shoreline Administrator for development adjacent to a river bluff
or ravine, or in other areas that circumstances may warrant, where
it is determined a larger buffer is necessary to prevent risk of
damage to proposed and existing development as in the case where
the area potentially impacted by a landslide exceeds 30 feet.
(vii) On-site sewage disposal systems, including drain fields, shall be
prohibited within landslide and erosion hazard areas and related
buffers.
(viii) Development designs shall meet the following basic requirements,
unless it can be demonstrated that an alternative design provides
greater long-term slope stability while meeting all other criteria of
this section. The requirement for long-term slope stability shall
exclude designs that require periodic maintenance or other actions
to maintain their level of function. The basic development design
standards are :
(A) Structures and improvement shall be clustered to retain as
much open space as possible and to preserve the natural
topographic features of the site.
(B) Structures and improvements shall conform to the natural
contour of the slope, and foundations sha)l be tiered where
possible to conform to existing topography.
(C) Structures and improvements shall be located to preserve
the most critical portion of the site and its natural landforms
and vegetation.
(D) The use ofretaining walls that allow the maintenance of
existing natural slope area is preferred over graded artificial
slopes .
(E) All development shall be designed to minimize impervious
lot coverage.
(c) Flood Hazard Areas. Activities in flood hazard areas shall comply with
PMC 29.01.550, Flood Hazard Areas, and the City of Pasco Floodplain
regulations (PMC Title 24).
(d) Seismic Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing seismic hazards shall
also meet the following requirements:
(i) Mitigation is implemented, which reduces the seismic risk to a
level equivalent to that which the activity would experience if it
were not located in a seismic hazard area.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Draft
155 An0hor Q~DlOnez,a & Asse0ialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 365 of 412
J1rne 2015Februa r CeGember 20232
(ii) Structural development proposals shall meet all applicable
provisions of Chapter 16 of the most current addition of the
International Building Code (Structural Forces/Structural Design
Requirements).
(iii) No residential structures or Essential Public Facility shall be
located on a Holocene fault line as indicated by USGS
investigative maps and studies.
(e) Mine Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing mine hazards shall also
meet the following requirements:
(i) Mitigation is implemented which reduces the risk from mine
hazards to a level equivalent to that which the activity would
experience if it were not located in a mine hazard area.
(f) Volcanic Hazard Areas. No additional requirements.
(8) Long-term Mitigation and Restoration Standards:
(a) The mitigation plan shall specifically address how the activity maintains
or reduces the pre-existing level of risk to the site and adjacent properties
on a long-term basis ( equal to or exceeding the projected lifespan of the
activity or occupation). Mitigation techniques providing long-term hazard
reduction are those that do not require periodic maintenance or other
actions to maintain their function.
(b) Mitigation may be required to avoid any increase in risk above the
pre-existing conditions following abandonment of the activity.
(c) Any required restoration shall meet the long-term hazard reduction
standards. In the case ofrestoration, long-term shall be defined as the
equivalent ofnatural function.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
,o.Rfifler Qe/1/0Re;z;a & AsseeialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
156
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 366 of 412
J1Jne 2015 FebruaryDesemller 20232
Article VI. Existing Uses, Structures, and Lots
29.01.600 Applicability
(1) All nonconformances in shoreline jurisdiction shall be subject to the provisions
of this article. For nonconformance of use, structures, and lots within shoreline
critical areas, PMC 29.01, Article V, Critical Areas, applies. When there is a
conflict between this Section and the Critical Area Section as applicable to
critical areas, the more restrictive standards shall apply.
(2) The provisions of this SMP do not supersede or relieve a property owner from
compliance with:
(a) The requirements of the International Building and Fire Codes; or
(b) The provisions of the SMP beyond the specific nonconformance addressed
by this section.
(3) A change in the required permit review process (e.g., Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit versus a Shoreline Special Use Permit) shall not create a
nonconformance.
(4) Any nonconformance that is brought into conformance for any period of time
shall forfeit status as nonconformance, except as specified in PMC 29.01.610,
Nonconforming Uses.
(5) A nonconforming lot, use, or structure may be deemed legally nonconforming
by providing documentation that the use in question occurred prior to the
effective date of this SMP, from two of the following:
(a) Local agency permit;
(b) Orthophotograph, aerial photograph, or planimetric mapping recognized
as legitimate by the agency; or
( c) Tax record.
29.01.610 Nonconforming Uses
(1) If, at the effective date of the SMP and any amendment thereto, a lawful use of
land exists that is made no longer permissible under the terms of this SMP, or
amendments thereto, such use may be continued as a nonconforming use so
long as it remains otherwise lawful subject to the following conditions:
(a) No nonconforming use shall be intensified, enlarged, increased, or
extended to occupy a greater area ofland than was occupied on the
effective date of the SMP or the amendment that made the use no longer
permissible. Provided that a nonconforming use may be enlarged,
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.nGhor QE,D/One,ca & AsseG.iatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
157
Page 367 of 412
JuRO 2015 FebruaryDeGember 20232'
increased, or extended in conformance with applicable bulk and
dimensional standards of this SMP upon approval of a Shoreline Special
Use Permit.
(b) No nonconforming use shall be moved in whole or in part to any other
portion of the lot that contains the nonconforming use.
( c) If any nonconforming use of land ceases for any reason for a period of
1 year or more, any subsequent use of such land shall conform to the
regulations specified by this SMP for the use environment in which such
land is located.
( d) A structure, which is being or has been used for a nonconforming use,
may be used for a different nonconforming use only upon a finding that:
(i) No reasonable alternative conforming use is practical;
(ii) The proposed use is equally or more appropriate to the shoreline
environment than the existing nonconforming use, and is at least as
consi.stent with the policies and provisions of the act and the SMP;
and
(iii) Such a change of use shall be subject to a Shoreline Special Use
Permit approval. Conditions may be attached to the permit as are
deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the above findings
and the requirements of the SMP and the SMA, and to ensure the
use will not become a nuisance or a hazard.
29.01.620 Nonconforming Structures
(1) If, at the effective date of the SMP or any amendment thereto, a lawful structure
or other improvement exists, which is made no longer permissible under the
terms of this SMP or amendment thereto, such structure or other improvement
may be continued as a nonconforming structure or other improvement so long
as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the following conditions:
(a) No nonconforming structure or other improvement shall be altered or
changed in a way which increases its nonconformity except as allowed in
PMC 29.01.620 (l)(b).
(b) Expansions of structures that are nonconforming with respect to a required
shoreline buffer:
(i) May not encroach any farther waterward into the required
shoreline buffer.
(ii) Expansions parallel to or landward of shoreline may be allowed
provided that said enlargement does not increase the extent of
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.RGRor QE,b/OR02a & l'.ssosiatosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
158
[ Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 368 of 412
June 201 SFebruaryCesember 20232
nonconformity by farther encroaching upon or extending into areas
where construction or use would not be allowed for new
development or uses.
(c) All expansion, extension, maintenance, or repair activities of
nonconforming structures or improvements shall be consistent with all
other provisions of this SMP, provided the cumulative cost of such
maintenance or repair shall not exceed 20% of the assessed valuation of
such building, structure, or land (as applicable) at the time such
maintenance is completed.
( d) When damaged, a nonconforming structure may be restored to the
configuration existing immediately prior to the time that the structure was
damaged, provided that:
(i) The structure is damaged to an extent not exceeding 50% of the
replacement cost of the original development.
(ii) The applicant applies for permits needed to restore the
development within 6 months of the date the damage occurred.
(iii) Reconstruction is started within 12 months and is completed within
24 months of the date of damage, unless an extension of time is
granted by the Shoreline Administrator upon written petition
substantiating to the satisfaction of the Administrator due cause for
such extension.
(iv) The degree of the nonconforming use, building, or structure is not
increased.
(e) Nothing in this section will prohibit vertical expansion up to the height
allowed in the applicable use environment, provided all other applicable
requirements of City's development regulations are met.
(f) Upkeep, repairs, and maintenance of a nonconforming structure or other
improvement shall be permitted.
(2) Should such structure or other improvement be moved for any reason for any
distance, it shall thereafter conform to the regulations for the use environment in
which it is located. Conformance shall be required when:
(a) A change of use is proposed;
(b) The use is terminated or discontinued for more than one-l-year, or the
structure( s) that houses the use is vacated for more than one-l-year; or
( c) The structure( s) or activity that occurs on the land in which the use is
conducted is proposed for relocation.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anehor QEA/Oneza & AsseeialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
159
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 369 of 412
June 201 li February Desemller 20232
(3) Residential structures and appurtenant structures that were legally established
and are used for a conforming use, but that do not meet standards for the
following, shall be considered a conforming structure: setbacks, buffers, or
yards; area; bulk; height; or density.
(4) For purposes of this section, "appurtenant structures" refer to garages, sheds,
and other legally established structures. Appurtenant structures do not include
bulkheads and other shoreline modifications or overwater structures.
29.01.630 Nonconformin g Lots
( 1) A nonconforming lot ma, be develo ped if permitted bv other land use
regu lations of the local government and so long as such develo pment conforms
to all other wquirements of the a pp licable master pro gram and the act.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anollor Qg,J/Onez;a & Assooiatos White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
160
Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + Level: 5 + J
Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left +
Aligned at: 0.63" + Tab after: 1.13" + Indent at: 1.13"
Page 370 of 412
J1me 2015 Februa ry Ceceml:>er 20232
Article VII. Administration and Enforcements
29.01.700 Roles and Responsibilities
(l) Shoreline Administrator:
(a) The Community and Economic Development Director of the City of Pasco
or his/her designee shall serve as the Shoreline Administrator. The
Shoreline Administrator shall issue written Shoreline Exemptions as
appropriate, and in the case of a Shoreline Substantial Development
Permit grant or deny the permit. The Shoreline Administrator shall
administer the shoreline permit and notification systems, anasy stems and
shall be responsible for coordinating the administration of shoreline
regulations with zoning enforcement, building permits, and all other
regulations regarding land use and development in the City.
(b) The Shoreline Administrator shall be familiar with regulatory measures
pertaining to shorelines and their use, and, within the limits of his or her
authority, shall cooperate in the administration of these measures. Permits
issued under the provisions of this shoreline regulation shall be
coordinated with other applicable land use and development regulatory
measures of the City. The Shoreline Administrator shall establish
procedures that advise all parties seeking building permits or other
development authorization of the need to consider possible shoreline
applications. It is the intent of City, consistent with its regulatory
obligations, to simplify and facilitate the processing of
Shoreline Substantial Development Permits.
(c) The Shoreline Administrator shall ensure proposed regulatory or
administrative actions do not unconstitutionally infringe upon private
property rights. Shoreline goals and policies should be pursued through
the regulation of development of private property only to an extent that is
consistent with all relevant constitutional and other legal limitations
(where applicable, statutory limitations such as those contained in
RCW 82.02 and RCW 43.21C.060) on the regulation of private property.
(d) The Shoreline Administrator shall apply PMC 29.01.500, Critical Areas.
(2) Hearing Examiner:
(a) The Hearing Examiner shall have the authority to decide on appeals from
administrative decisions issued by the Shoreline Administrator of this
SMP.
(b) The Hearing Examiner may grant or deny Shoreline Variances following a
public hearing.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QENOneza & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
161
Page 371 of 412
J1,1Re 2015 February DeGember 20232
(3) Planning Commission:
(a) The Planning Commission is vested with the responsibility to review the
SMP as part ofregular SMP updates required by RCW 90.58.080 as a
major element of the City's planning and regulatory program and make
recommendations for amendments thereof to the City Council.
(b) The Planning Commission reviews Shoreline Special Use Permits,
following an open record hearing, and sends a recommendation to the
City Council.
(4) City Council. The City Council is vested with authority to:
(a) Initiate an amendment to this SMP according to the procedures prescribed
in WAC 173-26-100.
(b) Adopt all amendments to this SMP, after consideration of the
recommendation of the Planning Commission. Substantive amendments
shall become effective immediately upon adoption by Ecology.
( c) Approve or deny all shoreline Special Use Permits forwarded by the
Planning Commission pursuant to PMC 25.86.090.
( d) Conducts closed record appeal of any recommendation of the
Planning Commission pursuant to PMC 25.86.080.
(e) Decide on appeals from the administrative decisions issued by the
Shoreline Administrator.
29.01.710 Interpretation
(I) Under the administrative provisions, the Shoreline Administrator shall have
authority to interpret this SMP, when such interpretation is clearly consistent
with the goals and policies of this SMP and the SMA.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator shall consult with Ecology if formal written
interpretations are developed as a result of a lack of clear guidance in the SMA,
the SMP guidelines, or this SMP to ensure any are consistent with the purpose
and intent ofRCW 90.58 and 173-26 WAC.
29.01.720 Statutory Noticing Requirements
(1) At a minimum, the Shoreline Administrator shall provide notice in accordance
with WAC 173.27-110 and may provide for additional noticing requirements.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARohor QEA/OReza & Assooiates While Bluffs Consulting
Draft
162
Page 372 of 412
JuAe 201 li February Deseml:ler 20232
29.01.730 Application Requirements
(1) A complete application for a Shoreline Substantial Development,
Shoreline Special Use, or Shoreline Variance Permit shall contain, at a
minimum, contain the information listed in WAC 173-27-180.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator shall provide written informational materials,
procedures, instructions, and forms required to submit an application for a
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, Variance Permit, or Special Use
Permit.
(3) These materials should include: a plan coversheet; a Joint Aquatic Resource
Permits Application (JARP A) form; a SEPA checklist; a fee schedule; review
criteria; and the process and timelines to assist potential applicants and
interested parties on the permit application submittal and review process.
(4) The Shoreline Administrator may vary or waive these requirements according to
administrative application requirements on a case-by-case basis.
(5) The Shoreline Administrator may require additional specific information
depending on the nature of the proposal and the presence of sensitive ecological
features or issues related to compliance with other applicable requirements and
the provisions of this SI'vIP.
29.01.740 Shoreline Substantial Development Permits
(1) A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit shall be required for all
development on shorelines, unless the proposal is specifically exempted per
PMC 29.01.770. Shoreline Substantial Development permits shall be processed
as an administrative pem1it.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator shall review Substantial Development Permit
applications, as required in PMC 29.01. 730, and approve or deny the permit.
(3) The Shoreline Administrator shall provide notice in accordance with
WAC 173.27-110 and may provide additional notice, according to the City's
noticing requirements.
( 4) A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit shall be granted only when the
development proposed is consistent with:
(a) The policies and procedures of the SMA, RCW 90.58;
(b) The applicable provisions of WAC 173-27; and
(c) This Sl'vIP.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QEIVOnoza & l'.ssoc.'a!osWhite Bluffs Consultin g
Draft
163
Page 373 of 412
Ju Re 201 SFebruar y DeGemlaer 20232
( 5) The Shoreline Administrator may attach conditions to the approval of permits as
necessary to ensure consistency of the project with the SMA and this SMP.
(6) Nothing shall interfere with the City's ability to require compliance with all
other applicable plans and laws.
29.01.750 Shoreline Special Use Permits
(1) Uses specifically classified or set forth in this SMP as conditional uses shall be
subject to review and condition by the Shoreline Administrator and Ecology.
Applications for a Shoreline Special Use Permit shall be processed pursuant to
PMC25.86.
(2) Other uses, which are not classified or listed or set forth in this SMP, may be
authorized as conditional uses provided the applicant can demonstrate
consistency with the requirements of this Section and the requirements for
conditional uses contained in this SMP.
(3) Uses that are specifically prohibited by this SMP may not be authorized as a
conditional use.
(4) Review Criteria for Shoreline Special Use Permit. Uses that are classified or set
forth in the applicable SMP as conditional uses may be authorized provided that
the applicant demonstrates all of the following:
(a) That the proposed use is consistent with the policies ofRCW 90.58.020
and theSMP;
(b) That the proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of
public shorelines;
(c) That the proposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible
with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the
area under the Comprehensive Plan and SMP;
( d) That the proposed use will cause no significant adverse effects to the
shoreline environment in which it is to be located; and
(e) That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect.
( 5) In the granting of all Shoreline Special Use Permits, consideration shall be
given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area.
For example, if Shoreline Special Use Permits were granted for other
developments in the area where similar circumstances exist, the total of the
conditional uses shall also remain consistent with the policies ofRCW
90.58.020 and shall not produce substantial adverse effects to the shoreline
environment.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARc/:ier QEA/0Rei9 & AsseciatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
164
Page 374 of 412
June 2015 Februa ryDe&ember 20232
( 6) In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached to the
permit by the City or Ecology to prevent undesirable effects of the proposed use
and/or to ensure consistency of the project with the SMA and this SMP.
(7) Nothing shall interfere with the City's ability to require compliance with all
other applicable plans and laws.
29.01.760 Shoreline Variance Permits
(1) The purpose of a variance is to grant relief to specific bulk, dimensional, or
performance requirements set forth in this SMP where there are extraordinary or
unique circumstances relating to the property such that the strict implementation
of this SMP would impose unnecessary hardships on the applicant or thwart the
policies set forth in RCW 90.58.020. Variances from the use regulations of the
SMP are prohibited. Applications for Shoreline Variance Permits shall be
processed pursuant to PMC 25.84.020 and PMC 29.01 .760 (2).
(2) Review Criteria:
(a) Shoreline Variance Permits should be granted in circumstances where
denial of the permit would result in a thwarting of the policy enumerated
in RCW 90.58.020. In all instances, the applicant must demonstrate that
extraordinary circumstances shall be shown and the public interest shall
suffer no substantial detrimental effect.
(b) Shoreline Variance Permits for development and/or uses that will be
located landward of the OHWM, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(b),
and/or landward of any wetland, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(h), may
be authorized provided the applicant can demonstrate all of the following:
(i) That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional, or performance ◄
standards set forth in the SMP precludes, or significantly interferes
with, reasonable use of the property;
(ii) That the hardship described in criterion PMC 29.01.760 (2)(b)(i) of
this subsection is specifically related to the property and is the
result of unique conditions, such as irregular lot shape, size, or
natural features, and the application of the SMP, and not, for
example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions;
(iii) That the design of the project is compatible with other authorized
uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the
Comprehensive Plan and SMP and will not cause adverse impacts
on the shoreline environment;
(iv) That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege not
enjoyed by the other properties in the area;
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
An0her QEA/One:za & Asse0.'atesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
165
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 375 of 412
dime 291 li Februa ryDesember 20232
(v) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to afford
relief; and
(vi) That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect.
(c) Shoreline Variance Permits for development and/or uses that will be
located waterward of the OHWM, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(b), or
within any wetland, as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(h), may be
authorized provided the applicant can demonstrate all of the following:
(i) That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional, or performance •
standards set forth in the applicable SMP precludes all reasonable
use of the property;
(ii) That the proposal is consistent with the criteria established under
PMC 29.01.760 (2)(b) (i)-(iv) above can be met; and
(iii) That the public rights ofnavigation and use of the shorelines will
not be adversely affected.
( d) In the granting of all Shoreline Variance Permits, consideration shall be
given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the
area. For example, if variances were granted to other developments and/or
uses in the area where similar circumstances exist, the total of the
variances shall also remain consistent with the policies ofRCW 90.58.020
and shall not cause substantial adverse effects to the shoreline
environment.
29.01.770 Exemptions from Shoreline Substantial Development Permits
(I) An exemption from the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit process is
not an exemption from compliance with the SMA or this SMP, or from any
other regulatory requirements. All proposed uses, activities, or development
occurring within shoreline jurisdiction must conform to the intent and
requirements ofRCW 90.58, the SMA, and this SMP, whether or not a permit
or other form of authorization is required.
(2) Letters of exemption shall be issued by the Shoreline Administrator when an
exemption applies or when a letter of exemption is required by the provisions of
WAC 173-27-050 and as follows:
(a) Any person claiming exemption from the Substantial Development Permit
requirements shall make an application to the Shoreline Administrator for
such an exemption in the manner prescribed by the
Shoreline Administrator, except that no written statement of exemption is
required for emergency development pursuant to WAC l 73-27-040(2Xd).
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARG/:Jer QEl'/ORez,a & A660Giatee White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
166
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 376 of 412
JuRe 2015 February()esember 20232
(b) The Shoreline Administrator is authorized to grant or deny requests for
statements of exemption from the Shoreline Substantial Development
Permit requirement for uses and developments within shorelines that are
specifically listed in PMC Section 29.01.770 (4). The statement shall be in
writing and shall indicate the specific exemption of this SMP that is being
applied to the development and shall provide a summary of the
Shoreline Administrator's analysis of the consistency of the project with
this SMP and the SMA. The letter shall be sent to the applicant and
maintained on file in the offices of the Shoreline Administrator.
( c) Statements of exemption may contain conditions and/or mitigating
measures of approval to achieve consistency and compliance with the
provisions of this SMP and the SMA.
(d) A denial ofan exemption shall be in writing and shall identify the
reason(s) for the denial. The Shoreline Administrator's decision may be
appealed pursuant to PMC 29.01.810, Appeals.
(e) Exempt activities requiring a JARPA shall not be conducted until a
statement of exemption has been obtained from the
Shoreline Administrator.
(3) Interpretations of Exemptions:
(a) Exemptions shall be construed narrowly. Only those developments that
meet the precise terms of one or more of the listed exemptions may be
granted exemption from the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
process.
(b) A development or use that is listed as a conditional :use pursuant to this
SMP, or is an unlisted use, must obtain a Shoreline Special Use Permit
even though the development or use does not require a
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. When a development or use is
proposed that does not comply with the bulk, dimensional, and
performance standards of this SMP, such development or use can only be
authorized by approval of a Shoreline Variance Permit.
( c) The burden of proof that a development or use is exempt from the permit
process is on the applicant.
( d) If any part of a proposed development is not eligible for exemption, then a
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is required for the entire
proposed development project.
(e) The Shoreline Administrator may attach conditions to the approval of
exempted developments and/or uses as necessary to ensure consistency of
the project with the SMA and this SMP. Additionally, nothing shall
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARGl=ier QE/'iOReza & l'sseGialesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
167
Page 377 of 412
Juno 2015 February DeGember 20232
interfere with each responsible local government's ability to require
compliance with all other applicable laws and plans.
( 4) The City shall exempt from the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
requirement the shoreline developments listed below:
(a) Any development of which the total cost or fair market value does not
exceed ei i;:htse¥eH thousand, five hundred four,'f..,_ ---➔1 dollars
($8,5047,047 .00)6,416 or as adjusted by the State Office of Financial
Management, if such development does not materially interfere with the
normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state. For purposes of
determining whether or not a permit is required, the total cost or fair
market value shall be based on the value of development that is occurring
on shorelines of the state as defined in RCW 90.58.030 (2)(c). The total
cost or fair market value of the development shall include the fair market
value of any donated, contributed, or found labor, as well as equipment, or
materials.
(b) Normal maintenance or repair of existing legally established structures or
developments, including damage by accident, fire, or elements.
Replacement of a structure or development may be authorized as repair
where such replacement is the common method of repair for the type of
structure or development and the replacement structure or development is
comparable to the original structure or development, including, but not
limited to, its size, shape, configuration, location, and external appearance
and the replacement does not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline
resources or environment.
( c) Construction of a normal protective bulkhead common to single-family
residences. A normal protective bulkhead includes those structural and
non-structural developments installed at or near, and parallel to, the
OHWM for the sole purpose of protecting an existing single-family
residence and appurtenant structures from loss or damage by erosion. A
normal protective bulkhead is not exempt if constructed for the purpose of
creating dry land. When a vertical or near vertical wall is being
constructed or reconstructed, not more than I cubic yard of fill per one
I foot of wall may be used as backfill. When an existing bulkhead is being
repaired by construction of a vertical wall fronting the existing wall, it
shall be constructed no farther waterward of the existing bulkhead than is
necessary for construction of new footings. When a bulkhead has
deteriorated such that an OHWM has been established by the presence and
action of water landward of the bulkhead, then the replacement bulkhead
must be located at or near the actual OHWM. Bioengineered
erosion-control projects may be considered a normal protective bulkhead
when any structural elements are consistent with the above requirements
and when the project has been approved by WDFW.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
ARcRor QEAlORo:zca & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
168
Page 378 of 412
June 201S Februar vDesember 20232
( d) Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the
elements. An emergency is an unanticipated and imminent threat to public
health, safety, or the environment that requires immediate action within a
time too short to allow full compliance with this SMP. Emergency
construction does not include development of new permanent protective
structures where none previously existed. Where new protective structures
are deemed by the Shoreline Administrator to be the appropriate means to
address the emergency situation, and upon abatement of the emergency
situation, the new structure shall be removed or any permit that would
have been required, absent an emergency, pursuant to RCW 90.58 these
regulations, or this SMP, shall be obtained. All emergency construction
shall be consistent with the policies and requirements of this section, RCW
90.58, and this SMP. As a general matter, flooding or other seasonal
events that can be anticipated and may occur but that are not imminent are
not an emergency.
(i)
(ii)
The following criteria shall exist to qualify any action under an
emergency provision:
(A) There must be an immediate threat to life, or public or
private property, or an immediate threat of serious
environmental degradation arising from a natural condition,
or non-natural accident or incident;
(B) The emergency response shall be confined to the action
necessary to protect life or property from damage;
(C) The scope of the emergency response must be limited to the
work necessary to relieve the immediate threat; and
(D) The emergency response applies only to the period of time
in which the actual emergency exists.
Once the emergency is abated or dissipated as deemed by
jurisdictional authorities, compliance with the requirements of this
section is required.
(iii) Emergency actions shall use reasonable methods that minimize the
impact to critical areas and their buffers. Persons who take
emergency action shall notify the Shoreline Administrator within
1 working day following commencement of the emergency
activity. Following such notification, the Shoreline Administrator
shall determine if the action taken was within the scope and
definition of emergency actions as defined above. If the
Shoreline Administrator determines the action taken or any part of
the action taken was beyond the scope and definition of allowed
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QEIVOneNJ & l'.sseciales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
169
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 379 of 412
JYRO 2111 liFebruaryDesem~er 2023a
emergency actions, then the enforcement provisions of
PMC 29.01.830 shall apply.
(e) Construction and practices normal or necessary for farming, irrigation, and
ranching activities, including agricultural service roads and utilities on
shorelands and the construction and maintenance of irrigation structures,
including, but not limited to, head gates, pumping facilities, and irrigation
channels. A feedlot of any size, all processing plants, other activities of a
commercial nature, and alteration of the contour of the shorelands by
leveling or filling, other than that which results from normal cultivation,
shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or ranching activities.
(f) Construction or modification of navigational aids such as channel markers
and anchor buoys.
(g) Construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a
single-family residence or appurtenance for their own use or for the use of
their family, which residence does not exceed a height of 35 feet above
average grade level and which meets all requirements of the City, other
than requirements imposed pursuant to RCW 90.58. Construction
authorized under this exemption, shall be located landward of the OHWM.
ili}__ Construction of a dock, including a community dock designed for pleasure
craft only and for the private non-commercial use of the owner, lessee, or
contract purchaser of a single-family or multiple-family residence. A dock
is a landin l! and moorage facilit, for watercraft and does not include
recreational decks . storage facilities or other appurtenances. This
exception applies when the fair market value of the dock does not exceed~
-a. Twent)-two thousand five hundred dollars !~22.500 1 for docks that are•
constructed to re place existin t docks , are of e.mal or lesser s,rnare foota ge
than the existing dock beirn.! n:rlaced ; or
b. Eleven thousand two hundred t'!.I 1 200 1 dollars for all other docks
constructed in fresh waters.
c. However. if subsequent construction occurs within five , ears of
com pletion of the prior construction . and the combined fair market value
Qfthe subsequent and prior construction exceeds the amount s pecified
above, the subse,.rnent construction shall be considered a substantial
develo pment for the pu rp ose of this chapter.ele\'eR thousaRd t\vo hundfed
~$~10 ,000, eut if suasequent eonstruetion ha¥ing a fai r
maFl,et Yalue e1weediRg $2,500.00 oeeurs withiR 5 years of eomJ3letioR of
the J3rior eoRstruetioR, the suasequORt eoRstruetioR shall be eoRsidered a
suasta:Rtial de,·eloJ3meRt for the J3UfJ3ose of this seetioR. Howe,·er. if
s11bsea YeRt eoRstruetioR oee11rs withiR fo·e (5 ) y ears ofeoma letioR of the
a rior eoHstreetioR , asd the eoHJeiHed fair maFl,et val11e of the suesea 11eHt
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
l'.no"1or Qliil'JOnoz;a & AssosialosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
170
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5", No bullets or numbering
I Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", Hanging: 0.5'', No bullets or
numbering
Page 380 of 412
(i)
(j)
(k)
(I)
June 2015 Februa rvDeGember 2023.!c
aRd prior eoRstruetioR eirneeds the amouRt sp eeified above, the subseaueRt
eoR struetion shall be eoRsidered a substaRtial develo pment for the p urp ose
of this ehap ter.
Operation, maintenance, repair, or construction of canals, waterways,
drains, reservoirs, or other facilities that now exist or are hereafter created
or developed as a part of an irrigation system for the primary purpose of
making use of system waters, including return flow and artificially stored
groundwater from the irrigation oflands.
The marking of property lines or comers on state-owned lands, when such
marking does not significantly interfere with normal public use of the
surface of the water.
Operation and maintenance of existing and future system of dikes, drains,
or other facilities existing on September 8, 1975 (where water is being
drained from irrigation runoff or shallow groundwater levels artificially
recharged through irrigation, and that), which are created, developed or
utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or diking system.
ARy pro:jeet vlifu a eertifieation from fue governor pursuant to RCW 80.50
(eertifieation from fue State Ilnergy Faeility Site Il•taluation Couneil).
fmhll_Site exploration and investigation activities that are prerequisite to
preparation of an application for development authorization under this
section, if:
(i) The activity does not interfere with the normal public use of
surface waters;
(ii) The activity will have no significant adverse impact on the
environment, including, but not limited to, fish, wildlife, fish or
wildlife habitat, water quality, and aesthetic values;
(iii) The activity does not involve the installation of any structure and,
upon completion of the activity, the vegetation and land
configuration of the site are restored to conditions existing before
the activity; and
(iv) A private entity seeking development authorization under this
section first posts a performance bond or provides other evidence
of financial responsibility to the local jurisdiction to ensure the site
is restored to preexisting conditions.
~The process of removing or controlling aquatic noxious weeds, as defined
in RCW 17 .26.020, through the use of an herbicide or other treatment
methods applicable to weed control published by the Departments of
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QEA/Onez;a & Associates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
171
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5"
Page 381 of 412
J1rno 2015 February DoGember 20232
Agriculture or Ecology jointly with other state agencies under
RCW 43.21C.
(-o){nL_ Watershed restoration projects as defined in RCW 89.08.460.
~A public or private project that is designed to improve fish or wildlife
habitat or fish passage. consistent with RCW 90.58.147 and RCW 77.55.
wh6R all ef the fellewiftg llflflly:
(i) The projest has been
Qflf!feved by \l/DF'.¥;
(ii) The prnjest has feseived
I-IPA by '.VDFW pursuant
te RC'.¥ 77.55;
(iii) The City has detef!fliaed
that the proj est is
substantially seasisteat
vtith the leoal SMP. The
City shall make sush
detenBiftatiea ia a timely
maanef aad f!FOYide it by
letter to the llf!Plisant; and
(iv) Fish habitat eahans0H1eat
prnjests that seafef!fl te
the fJfSYisieas ef RC1N
77.55.181 are detenBifted
te be seasisteat with lesal
SMPs-:
(q) Any fJ9fSea seaduetiftg a f9ffledial aetiea at a faeiliey J3Ufsuaat te a eeaseat
deefee, efdOf, ef agrned efdOf issued J3UfSUaat te RCW 70.105D ef to
Eeelegy vih6R it eeaduets a fOffledial aetiea uadef RCW 70.105D.
illl.__Other than conversions to non-forest land use, forest practices regulated
under RCW 76.09 are not subject to additional regulations under the SMA
or this SMP (90.58.030(2)(d)(ii)).
I-Aly! The external or internal retrofittin g of an existing structure with the
exclusive purpose of com pliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et sc J.l or to otherwise provide ph \sical
access to the structure by individuals with disabilities.
29.01.780 Duration of Permits
(1) The duration of permits shall be consistent with WAC 173-27-090 as follows:
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Ammor Q~OReZca & l'.sseGiatesWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
172
Page 382 of 412
June 201 ii Februa ryDesember 20232
(a) Construction activities shall be commenced or, where no construction
activities are involved, the use or activity shall be commenced within
2 years of the effective date of a substantial development permit. The City
may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed 1 year based
on reasonable factors if a request for extension has been filed before the
expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of
record on the substantial development permit and to the department.
(b) Authorization to conduct development activities shall terminate 5 years
after the effective date of a Substantial Development Permit. However, the
City may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed 1 year
based on reasonable factors if a request for extension has been filed before
the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties
of record and to the department.
29.01.790 Initiation of Development
(1) Each permit for a Substantial Development, Shoreline Special Use, or
Shoreline Variance issued by local government shall contain a provision that
construction pursuant to the permit shall not begin and is not authorized until
21 days from the date of~ with Ecology as defined in RCW
90.58.140(6) and WAC 173-27-130, or until all review proceedings initiated
within 21 days from the date of~ of the decision. The date of filing
for a Substantial Development Permit is the date of actual receipt by Ecology of
a local government's final decision on the permit. With regard to a permit for a
Shoreline Variance or a Shoreline Special Use, date of filing means the date a
responsible local government or applicant receives the written decision of
Ecology. When a Substantial Development Permit and a Special Use or
Variance Permit are required for a development, the submittal on the permits
shall be made concurrently.
(2) Permits for Substantial Development, Shoreline Special Use, or
Shoreline Variance may be in any form prescribed and used by the City,
including a combined permit application form. Such forms will be supplied by
the City.
(3) A permit data sheet shall be submitted to Ecology with each shoreline permit.
The permit data sheet form shall be consistent with WAC 173-27-990.
29.01.800 Review Process
(I) After the City's approval of a Shoreline Special Use or Variance Permit, the
City shall submit the permit to Ecology for approval, approval with conditions,
or denial. Ecology shall render and transmit to the City and the applicant its
final decision approving, approving with conditions, or disapproving the permit
within 30 days of the date of submittal by the City pursuant to WAC 173-27-
110.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AnGhor QE"/Onoza & AssoGiates White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
173
Page 383 of 412
JuRe 2015 FebruaryDesember 20232
(2) Ecology shall review the complete file submitted by the City on Shoreline
Special Use or Variance Permits and any other information submitted or
available that is relevant to the application. Ecology shall base its determination
to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Special Use Permit or
Variance Permit on consistency with the policy and provisions of the SMA and
except as provided in WAC 173-27-210 and the criteria in WAC 173-27-160
and 173-27-170.
(3) The City shall provide timely notification of the Ecology's final decision to
those interested persons having requested notification from local government
pursuant to WAC 173-27-130.
29.01.810 Appeals
(1) Appeals of Shoreline Permit Decisions. The City's decisions on shoreline
permits may be appealed to the following bodies in this sequence:
(a) Pasco City Council in accordance with PMC 25.86.080.
(b) State Shorelines Hearings Board (SHB) in Tumwater.
( c) SHB decisions may be appealed to superior court.
( d) Superior court decisions may be appealed to the Court of Appeals.
(e) Appeals Court decisions may be appealed to the Washington Supreme
Court.
(t) Appeals to the SHB and courts are governed by RCW 90.58.180,
RCW 43.218.001, RCW 34.05 Part V, and WAC 461.08.
(2) All requests for review of any final permit decisions under RCW 90.58 and
WAC 173-27 are governed by the procedures established in RCW 90.58.180,
WAC 461-08, and the rules of practice and procedure of the SHB.
29.01.820 Amendments to Permits
( 1) A permit revision is required whenever the applicant proposes substantive
changes to the design, terms, or conditions of a project from that which is
approved in the permit. Changes are substantive if they materially alter the
project in a manner that relates to its conformance to the terms and conditions of
the permit, the SMP, and/or the policies and provisions ofRCW 90.58. Changes
that are not substantive in effect do not require approval of a revision.
(2) Revisions to permits shall be considered consistent with WAC 173-27-100.
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anof:lor QE/!/Onoz,a & AssoGiatosWhite Bluffs Consulting
Draft
174
Page 384 of 412
June 2015 Februa ry 0ecember 202~
29.01.830 Enforcement
(1) The SMA provides for a cooperative program between the City and Ecology to
implement and enforce the provisions of the SMA and this SMP. This section
provides for a variety of means of enforcement, including civil and criminal
penalties, orders to cease and desist, and orders to take corrective action, in
accordance with WAC 173-27-270, 173-27-280, 173-27-290, and 173-27-300,
and PMC 25.08. The enforcement means and penalties provided herein are not
exclusive and may be taken or imposed in conjunction with, or in addition to,
any other civil enforcement actions and civil penalties, injunctive or declaratory
relief, criminal prosecution, actions to recover civil or criminal penalties, or any
other action or sanction authorized by this section, or any other provision of the
PMC, or any other provision of state or federal law and regulation.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator, with the assistance of the City Attorney, shall
have authority to commence and prosecute any enforcement action authorized
by this section. In determining the appropriate enforcement actions to be
commenced and prosecuted, the Shoreline Administrator shall consider the
following factors:
(a) The nature of the violation;
(b) The extent of damage or potential future risk to the shoreline environment
and its ecological functions or to the public health and safety, caused by or
resulting from, whether directly or indirectly, the alleged violation;
( c) The existence of knowledge, intent, or malice on behalf of the violator;
(d) The economic benefit or advantage that accrued to the violator(s) as a
result of the violation; and
(e) The estimated actions and costs of providing adequate mitigation,
restoration, rehabilitation, or enhancement to repair or minimize any
substantial adverse impacts upon the shoreline environment and its
ecological functions or the public health and safety.
(3) The Shoreline Administrator may commence and prosecute enforcement action
jointly with Ecology. Pursuant to WAC 173-27, Ecology may initiate and
prosecute enforcement action separate from the Shoreline Administrator.
29.01.840 Cumulative Effects of Shoreline Developments
(1) The City will periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the SMP update for
achieving no net loss of shoreline ecological functions with respect to shoreline
permitting and exemptions. At the end of the first full year after adoption, and at
the end of every other year thereafter, the Shoreline Administrator shall prepare
a report documenting shoreline Substantial Development Permits, Special Use
Permits, and Variances, including the exempt use activity approvals and the
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
AAGhor QE-IVOAoza & Assooiales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
175
Page 385 of 412
JllAO :i!015 February Dosomber 2023:i!
locations and effects of each by type and classifications. The report should
include activities involving development, conservation, restoration, mitigation,
and enforcement. It should summarize the net change of developments
(including new development and decommissioning of structures and protected
areas) using indicators such as linear length of stabilization and flood hazard
structures, number of overwater structures ( e.g., piers and docks), road length
within shoreline, number ofwaterbody road crossings, number oflevees/dikes,
acres of impervious surface areas, acres of vegetation, acres of permanently
protected areas, or areas with limited development. Compliance and
enforcement activity will also be tracked.
(2) The Shoreline Administrator Official , will, to the extent feasible, coordinate
with other City departments or as adjacent jurisdictions, to assess cumulative
effects of shoreline development.
29.01.850 Amendments to Shoreline Master Program
(I) Amendments to the SMP shall be processed as legislative decisions pursuant to
PMC 24.88 and WAC 173-26-110.
(2) Any locally approved amendments to the SMP will not become effective until
approved by Ecology.
29.01.860 Shoreline Environment Designation Maps or Official Shoreline Map
City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program
Anchor QEA/One2a & Associales White Bluffs Consulting
Draft
176
Page 386 of 412
SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM PERIODIC REVIEW
Periodic Review Checklist: 2021 version
This document is intended for use by counties, cities and towns subject to the Shoreline
Management Act (SMA) to conduct the "periodic review" of their Shoreline Master Programs
(SMPs). The review is required under the SMA at RCW 90.58.080 (4 ). Ecology rules that define
the procedures for conducting these reviews include a requirement to use this checklist to
ensure a successful review (WAC 173-26-090). By filling out this checklist, the local government
is demonstrating compliance with the minimum scope of review requirements of WAC 173-26-
090(2)(d)(ii). The checklist is organized into two parts.
Part One is used to identify how the SMP complies with current state laws, rules and guidance.
This checklist identifies amendments to state law, rules and applicable updated guidance
adopted between 2007 and 2021 that may trigger the need for local SMP amendments.
Part Two is used to document local review to ensure the SMP is consistent with changes to the
local comprehensive plans or development regulations, and to consider changes in local
circumstances, new information or improved data. As part of this periodic review the local
government should include consideration of whether or not the changes warrant an SMP
amendment.
How to use this checklist
See the associated Periodic Review Checklist Guidance for a description of each item, relevant
links, review considerations, and example language.
Use the review column to document review considerations and determine if local amendments
are needed to maintain compliance. See WAC 173-26-090(3)(b). Ecology recommends
reviewing all items on the checklist.
Use the action column as a final summary identifying your final action taken to address the
identified change in state law, rule or guidance. See WAC 173-26-090(3)(d)(ii)(D), and WAC 173-
26-110(9)(b). This will likely include one of the following:
• Amendment proposed (include code citation);
• No amendment needed; or
• Not applicable .
Example
Row Summary of change Review Action
2017a OFM adjusted the cost threshold for 21A .25 .290B refers to the statutory No amendments needed .
substantial development to $7,047. thresholds, as amended by OFM.
For more informati on
Coordinate with Ecolo gy re gional p lanner for more information on how to use this checklist and
conduct the periodic review.
Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist: 2021 version
CITY OF PASCO -DRAFT FOR REVIEW
1
Page 387 of 412
DEPARTMENT OF
~~ ECOLOGY
State of Washington
Prepared By Jurisdiction Date
White Bluffs Consulting City of Pasco April 2023
Part One: State laws, rules and guidance review
Part One is used to demonstrate compliance with WAC 173-26-090(2)(d)(i)(A). This checklist
identifies amendments to state law, rules and applicable updated guidance adopted between
2007 and 2021 that may trigger the need for local SMP amendments during periodic reviews.*
-
Row Summary of change Review Action
2021
a. The Legislature amended floating
on-water residences provisions
The SMP prohibits new [ No action required.
floating residences and over-
water residential structures in
shoreline jurisdiction per
29.01.420 (7).
b. The Legislature clarified the
permit exemption for fish
passage projects
1 SMP 29.01.770 lists Update SMP 29.01.770 with
I requirements for exemption j reference to most current
I of f~sh passage improvement state statutes.
1 .,ProJects. ___ _
2019
OFM adjusted the cost threshold SMP 29.01.770 lists old cost
for building freshwater docks I thresholds.
l
2017
--~:ToFM-;dj~-st~d the ~~st-tt{;--~;h~lcfl SMP-29.01j70 ~sts olci"cost
for substantial development to I threshold.
$7,047. I
I
b. Ecology permit rules clarified the SMP 29.01.080 (30) defines
definition of "development"
does not include dismantling or
removing structures.
development.
Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist: 2021 version
CITY OF PASCO -DRAFT FOR REVIEW
I
Updated text in 29.01.770 to
include updated cost
thresholds and recommended
I language.
OFM revised the substantial
development cost threshold
to $8,504 in July 2022 (WSR
22-11-036). Revised SMP
29.01.770 to use this more up
to date value
Add to definition:
"Development" does not
include dismantling or
removing structures if there is
no other associated
development or re-
development.
2
Page 388 of 412
Row Summary of change
c. [ Ecology adopted rules clarifying
I
exceptions to local review under
the SMA.
I
d. Ecology amended rules clarifying
permit filing procedures
I ~n~istent "".'it~ a 2011 st~tute.
e. Ecology amended forestry use
regulations to clarify that forest
practices that only involves
timber cutting are not SMA
"developments" and do not
require SDPs.
f. Ecology clarified the SMA does
notapp~tolandsunder
exclusive federal jurisdiction
g. Ecology clarified "default"
provisions for nonconforming
uses and development.
2016
a.
b.
The Legislature created a new
shoreline permit exemption for
retrofitting existing structure to
comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act.
Ecology updated wetlands
critical areas guidance including
implementation guidance for the
2014 _wetlands rating system.
Review
The SMP does not currently
contain a section for
exceptions to local review .
SMP 29.01.770 has
exemptions for remedial
projects and EFSEC projects.
SMP 29.01.790 uses "date of
receipt."
SMP29.01.770(p) states that
forest practices regulated
under RCW 76.09 (other than
1 conversions to non-forest land
j use) are not subject to the
I SMP.
The SMP does not have any
clauses or provisions specific
to exclusive federal
jurisdicti~n_._
SMP 29.01.610 and 29.01.620
have specific provisions for
nonconforming uses and
structures, but not lots
specifically.
SMP 29.01.080 does not
I
DEPARTMENT OF
ECOLOGY
State of Washington
Action
Added a new subsection to
29.01.020 to include
exceptions to review.
Deleted references to
remedial projects and EFSEC
projects from 29.01.770
because those are now
included in the list of
exceptions.
Replaced "date of receipt"
with "date of filing" in
29.01.790.
No action required.
Included in new section on
exceptions (29.01.020).
Add new section for
nonconforming lots
(29.01.630).
I Add definitions for
include definitions for nonconforming development,
nonconforming development, I use, and lot in SMP 29.01.080.
use, or lot_.__ I
SMP 29.01.770 does not
I contain any exemptions for
I ADA retrofits.
Add an exemption for ADA
retrofits to SMP 29.01.770.
I
SMP 29.01.520 references the
2014 rating system.
2014 wetland ratings system
already incorporated
Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist: 2021 version
CITY OF PASCO -DRAFT FOR REVIEW
3
1
Page 389 of 412
Row
2015
a.
Summary '!f chan{l_f!
The Legislature adopted a 90-day
target for local review of
Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT)
projects.
Review
WSDOT projects are now
included as an exception in
SMP 29.01.020.
Action
----
No further revisions needed.
* See additional considerations for Ocean Management within Ecology's Ocean Management Checklist
and associated guidance for using the Ocean Management Checklist. This checklist and guidance
summarizes state law, rules and applicable updated information related to Ocean Resources
Management Act (ORMA) and the Washington State Marine Spatial Plan (MSP). All jurisdictions with
coastal waters must implement ORMA and the MSP applies to all jurisdictions that overlap with the MSP
Study Area. Clallam County, Jefferson County, Grays Harbor County, Pacific County, Ilwaco, Long Beach,
Raymond, South Bend, Cosmopolis, Ocean Shores, Hoquiam, Aberdeen, Westport need to plan for
ocean uses consistent with ORMA and the MSP and should be using the Ocean Management Checklist in
addition to this Periodic Review Checklist.
Part Two: Local review amendments
Part Two is used to demonstrate compliance with WAC 173-26-090(2)(d)(ii). This checklist
identifies changes to the local comprehensive plans or development regulations, changes in
local circumstances, new information or improved data that may warrant an SMP amendment
during periodic reviews.
Changes to Comprehen~ive Plan and Development regulations
Question
Have you had Comprehensive Plan
amendments since the SMP comprehensive
update that may trigger need for an SMP
amendment?
Have you had Development Regulations
amendments since the SMP comprehensive
update that may trigger need for an SMP
amendment?
Has your Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO)
been updated since the SMP
comprehensive update? If yes, are there
changes that trigger need for an SMP
amendment?
Answer
□ Yes
1Z1 No
□ Yes
1Z1 No
□ Yes
1Z1 No
Discussion
The City updated the Comprehensive Plan in
2018 but had previously incorporated the
SMP goals and policies, and no additional
-~_hanges were maEe to impact the SMP.
The City made minor updates to the City
development regulations in 2018 but had
previously incorporated the SMP
development regulations, and no additional
changes were made to impact the SMP.
The SMP includes critical area protections
within the regulations section and updates
were made based on the current mitigation
guidance provided by the Department of
Ecology in April 2021 and the land use
intensity table was updated with 2022 CAO
guidance. The minimum buffer width
wording was changed to say at its narrowest
Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist: 2021 version
CITY OF PASCO -DRAFT FOR REVIEW
4
Page 390 of 412
DEPARTMENT OF
ECOLOGY
State of Washington
Question Answer Discussion
point shall not be less than 75% instead of
65% of the required buffer width.
Are CAO provisions incorporated by
reference (with ordinance# and date) into
your SMP? If yes, is it the current CAO or a
previous version?
□ Yes
IXI No
See response above
Has any new shoreline area been annexed
into your jurisdiction since your SMP was
updated? If yes, were these areas pre-
designated?
□ Yes No SMP areas were annexed out of the City.
~ No
Other □ Yes
~ No
If your review and evaluation resulted in proposed SMP text or map amendments, please
create a table that identifies changes to the SMP for consistency with amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan and Development regulations. Example format:
--
SMP Summary of proposed change Citation to any applicable
RCWorWAC
Rationale for how the amendment
Section -·--
N/A N/A
I
----~~---··--
! N/A
I
I
I
I
I
[
~~!!1,:>_l!es with SMA or Rules
N/A
Changes to local circumstance, new information, or i~proved data
Question Answer Discussion
Has your jurisdiction experienced any □ Yes No changes
significant events, such as channel IXI No
migration, major floods or landslides that
impacted your shoreline and could trigger a
need for an SMP amendment?
Have FEMA floodplain or floodway maps □ Yes
been recently updated for your jurisdiction? ~ No
If your SMP extends shoreline jurisdiction to
the entire 100-year floodplain, has FEMA
updated maps that trigger a need for an
SMP amendment?
Have you issued any formal SMP □ Yes Not applicable
Administrative Interpretations that could IZl No
lead to improvements in the SMP?
Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist: 2021 version
CITY OF PASCO -DRAFT FOR REVIEW
5
Page 391 of 412
DEPARTMENT OF
ECOLOGY
State of Washington
I Are there any Moratoria in place affecting
development in the Shoreline?
Have staff identified the need for
clarification based on implementation or
other changes? e.g., modifications to
environment designations, mapping errors,
inaccurate internal references.
Are there other changes to local
circumstances, new information, or
improved data that need to be addressed in
your SMP?
□ Yes
IX! No
□ 1 Yes
1
If your review and evaluation resulted in proposed SMP text or map amendments, please
create a table that identifies changes to the SMP to address changes to local circumstances,
new information, or improved date. Example format:
SMPSection
Various
29.01.080
--Summary of proposed
chan~e
Minor text revisions to
correct grammar,
formatting, and
typographical errors.
---------
Citation to any applicable Rationale for how the amendment
Not applicable. Not applicable.
RCW or WAC l _£~mplies with ~M~~! Rules
Delete definitions in I Not applicable.
SMP that are not used
in other parts of the
I Not applicable.
document.
Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist: 2021 version
CITY OF PASCO -DRAFT FOR REVIEW
6
Page 392 of 412
City of Pasco SMP Periodic Review
Comment List
Comm@nt
Number Data
2/21/2023
2/27/2023
Commenter•
Peter C. Rieke, Ph.D. & Jenny
Rieke
lnJi.114
Peh'r ik@sbarter.net
Arrow Coyote -Colville Tribe [arroW.CQ\Oteflllcolvilletribes.com_
Comment Topic Comment Response
Sometime in January and early February, Pasco maintenance personnel removed native vegetation over substantial areas Su breaches This comment addresses compliance with the current SMP. The City Economic
!3a and 3b as designated in the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) document of 2016. The majority of the damage is in Subreach 3b and and Community Development Department has shared this comment with other
!constitutes an area that extends approximately½ mile in length from just west of the Ivy Glades development to within a short applicable City departments for follow up and will track progress on addressing
distance of the Chiawana Park boat basin. The damage extends from Just north of the Sacagawea Heritage Trail (SHT) towards the this issue. Bec::iuse this is related to an SMP implementation compliance
river and contours around the larger trees nearer the shoreline proper. Almost all this area is within the 200' shoreline distance from concern it is not necessary to delay the periodic SMP update process.
the ordinary high-water mark (OHWM). From observation of this area, some mechanical means such as a "brush hog" or other
mowing apparatus was used to remove vegetation to ground level. In a second smaller area located in Su breach 3a just north of the
boat basin, native vegetation was completely removed down to and possibly including root systems using some combination of
mowing and hand digging. The areas in question are designated as Urban Conservancy in the SMP and policy for such areas is "to
protect and restore ecological functions of open space, l'loodplain, and other sensitive lands, while accommodating low-intensity
uses." Su breach 3b is an especlally diverse habitat for an urban area and supports a significance wildlife population including many
small birds and mammals that use the native bunch grass and rabbitbrush for forage and cover. The area also supports a significant
population of birds of prey including Bald Eagles, Osprey and hawks. Fox, dear and beaver are also dependent on this habitat. The
area is frequently used by residents who utilize the hiking trails near the river. lt is one of the more popular sections of the [shoreline]
!because of the beauty of the habitat, areas of arboreal shade and protection from wind. We contend that the removal of the native
l
vegetatlon of such an expansive area designated as Urban Conservancy constitutes a gross violation of the SMP agreement between
the City of Pasco and the Dept. of Ecology. As such we are asking as detailed below for:
l)Assessment by an independent expert analysis of the extent of habitat, cultural and historical damage.
2)Preparation of a restoration/remediation plan that addresses the loss of habitat and/or cultural damage.
3)1mplementation of an educational initiative to Inform local citizens of the importance of this type of habitat and how such riparian
and upland habitats protect the river from pollution and subsequent eutrophication.
4)Restructuring of the Cities shoreline park management personnel to prevent future such habitat destruction.
S)Documentation of improved management practices in the draft 2023 SMP. The City will need more time to evaluate the current
shoreline management practice, plan how to bring them Into compliance and document those practices in the new SMP. The Dept of
Ecology will need more time to evaluate the new plan, conduct site visits and make expert recommendations. We request that the
;city ask for and be granted an eldension.
l
'rhe project entails the City of Pasco Shoreline Master Program Coalition and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) are !The City is committed to coordinating with the Colville Confederated Tribes,
seeking comments on the City's Shoreline Master Program (SMP) periodic review and proposed SMP Amendments. The City and the other tribes, the USACE and Washington State agencies to identify and protect
Washington State Department of Ecology have elected to use a joint review process, allowed under WAC 173-26-104. cultural resources under this SMP.
Please note that the project is within the Tri-Cities Archaeological District, numerous archaeological sites (many partially or fully
inundated), and Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPI. Please be advised your proposed undertaking lies within the traditional territory
of the Pal us Tribe. The Pal us Tribe is a constituent member of and represented by the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
[Colville Confederated Tribes (CCT)]. The CCT is governed by the Colville Business Council (CBC). The CBC delegated to the Tribal
Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) the responsibility of representing the CCT with regards to cultural resources management issues
throughout these traditional territories of our constituent tribes under Resolution 1996-29. This area Includes most of eastern
1:::~::g~;t: :;:r::::::~~e;~~:~~n~asi°pu;~k ~:::~ ~:t!:~~~~::;:• ~:t:~i:::::e:~~o~e;;.:~~dr:~:~~s:~~~:ha: ~~I~:~ in
!section 101 Id) (2) of the National Historic Preservation Act. The assumption agreement explicitly tasks the Tribal Historic Preservation
Officer (THPO), to advise and assist Federal and State agencies and local governments in carrying out their historic preservation
responsibilities and for the CCT to carry out their responsibilities for review of federal undertakings regarding cultural resources
matters.
As the shoreline Includes Army District Corps of Engineers managed by the Walla Walla District Corps of Engineers and other possible
state and/or federal managed properties, please include all the appropriate laws governing cultural resources. Also, any projects or
changes that may affect cultural resources will also need to be consulted on by the CCT and the Washington Department of
Archaeology and Hlstorlc Preservation (DAHP). Please make sure that this plan includes a section on Cultural Resources, that would
include communication with the area tribes, state
Page1of5 Page 393 of 412
Ctty of Pasco SMP Periodic Rll!'lliew
Comment Ust
O,mment
Date Number
3 3/8/2023
4
5
6
7
•
9
10
11
Commenter• Em■ff
Heather Bush, WA Dept of
Ecology !•~QS61tu~!:Y Yi..f!:. ~Q~
Comment fopk c.omment Response
Upon closer review, the current Pasco SMP contains wetland buffer reduction allowances to 65% of the recomml!nded width. This Update all sections as suggested
allowanea is in excess of what Ecology recommends, I recommend changing it to: (D) The minimum buffer width at its narrowest point
shall not be less than 75% of the required buffer width established under this SMP; In addition, the City should use the updated land
use intensity table on pgs. D-6 and D-7, from our 2022 CAO Guidance. It's a more complete and better described list (compared to
SM P, Table 29.01.520 (8)(b): Land Use Intensity). I also suggest updatlnt the references on pg. 128 & 130 from: Wetland Mitiaation in
Washington State, Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance (Version 1. Publication #06-06-0lla, March 2006) and Wetland Mitigation in
Washineton State, Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans (Version 1, Publication #06-06-011b, March 2006) to our joint agency mitigatio n
auidance document. The current guidance was revised and published in 2021. lastly, please update Table 29.01.520 to reflect the
current mitigation guidance recommendations (compared to Table 68·11, Compensation ratios for permanent Impacts for eastern and
western Washington) which has a "preservation" column and eliminates columns for "re -establlshment or creation and
rehabilitatlo n."Vou still have time to includes these comments/make these suggested changes prior to initial submittal. Please
remember to add them to the J]er iodic review checkltst:, which should reflect all proposed amendments.
A) In general, there is a lack of comprehension among city staff of the SMP requirements especiaTiy in the parlc's personnel. A See response to Comment L
knowledgeable read er of the SMP can find dozens of vlolattons in which the city and/or shoreline residents are in vi~ation of this
document. BIAlso, there is no effective way to determine ifencroachment upon ecologic.al function has been made espedally if that
encroachment is gradual in nature. A mechanism to quantify the existing state of habitat along the shoreline is needed thi!lt can then
be used to quantify any pos5lble encroachment C)As much of the shoreline Is under direct control by the City, any violation of the
SMP by the City itself represents a conflict of interest. The Dept. of Ecology should be required to review enforcement decisions
under these circumstances, O)There needs to be a g~ater ~cognition that a view or vista of the water Is not the sole criteria for
"visual" public access. The habitat along the shoreline as well as the associated wildlife that that habitat supports has its own
aesthetic value. In previous years, shoreline habitats and vegetation have been literally clearcut to provide for the view of local
residents. Park users who gamer a closer view are presented with an ugly mass of stumps and detritus.
1) The Su breach designation maps were not included in this draft and presumably have not changed since the 2016 SMP. This There are no changes being proposed in the subreach designations or
sho uld be clarified and statement made to such effect, environment designations
2) There does not sttm to be significant participation of those responsible for maintaining Pasco's shoreline parks. It is clear that See respon54!! to Comment 1.
transg re ssio n of the SMP by parks personnel indicate a lack of understand ing of the purpose and in tent of the SMP. The city should
sttk to remedy this lack of communkation.
3) The draft makes frequent reference to PMC 29.01 which to the btst of this reviewer's knowtedge does not exist Title 29 of the When the SMP Is codified in the City's munldpal code, then numbering will be
PMC starts with "'29.05 Authority and Purpose" changed to match the SMP and the City's munidpal code.
4) In the para2raph starting with "The SMA was enacted in 1971 ... " should be expanded to review the history of the SMP from the Update as suggested
original 1974 franklin county SMP, the adoption by reference in 2003 (unclear of history here), the revision in 2016 and the current
revision. It is important to understand the evolution and history of the SMP process,
S) 29.01.020 Appficability(ll(c) "Routine landscape maintenance of established, ornamental landscaping, such as lawn mowing, See response to Comment 1.
pruning and weedine;" Is llsted as an exclusion. Unfortunately, mowlna has resulted in significant, creeping loss of habitat along the
shoreline especially in Chiawana Park. This issue needs to be addressed by this document.
6) 29.0L030 Purpose (ll(bl(v) "Ecological functions of the shoreline are maintained and Improved over time". This statement No additional changes planned. The SMP has provisions included to achieve no
should be amended to require the city to have a written plan to impro'lfe ecological function especiaUy in areas designated as Native, net loss of ec~ogical functions, and improve functions over time as habitat
Urban Conservation or Recreation. Al to often creeping loss of ecological function occurs and some plan is needed to prevent this areas mature.
gradual kiss and improve as possible ec~ogical function:
7} 29.0LOSO Definitions In} "'Invasive, non-native ~getaOon species" means the plants listed for Eastern Washington In Add definition back Into the document
Washington ·state Noxious Weed Board PlJblfcatlon # 820·264E IN/6/09), or the latest version of this document". This definition was
removed vet the tenns invasive and non•native are use throughout the document and need definition. It may be that the referred
pubUcation may no longer be available but an explicit definition is still needed.
Page 2 ofS Page 394 of 412
City of Pasco SMP Periodic Review
Comment List
Comment
Number
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
o.~
4/19/2023
Commenter• Email
Peter C. Rieke ee bf 'ik,1!:charter.net
C.Omment Topic Comm11nt Re1ponH
81 29.01.080 Definitions (74) "Nonconforming development" or "nonconforming structure" means an existing structure that was Water rights are a separate topic from this provision; no change planned to
lawfully constructed at the time it was built but is no longer fully consistent with present regulations such as setbacks, buffers or !address this comment
yards; area; bulk; height or density standards due to subsequent changes to the master program." Should be amended to specifically
include water rights as governed by the Dept. of Ecology
1
9) 29.01.080 Definitions (SS)(a) "Visual Access" should be amended to read ''Visual public access may consist of view corridors,
viewpoints, or other means of visual approach to public waters, adjoining habitat and wildlife areas. It should be made clear that a
visual aesthetic will include vegetation and wildlife that exist along the shoreline and not just a view of the water.
Update as suggested
10) 29.01.240 Shoreline Vegetation Conservation (1) states that "Vegetation conservation standards shall not apply retroactively to E e City has an existing inventory, analysis and characterization report of the
existing uses and developments. Vegetation associated with existing structures, uses, and developments may be maintained within shorelines that is still accurate for the shorelines area. See response to
shoreline jurisdiction as stipulated in the approval documents for the development." A new section should be added here that comment 1
creates an inventory of current vegetation types that can be used to monitor encroachment on vegetation by land management
processes such a brush removal, mowing and other landscaping activities.
11) 29.01.300 Agriculture 110) should read "New agricultural activities-shall not remove existing native or non-native vegetation, Update as suggested
1:;i;:~_:
0
r:::;i;
0
:~s~::si:;:~i:es::~.ta;~en~:~r::::::::~::~~a;:n;:;~:t~;:::;_as and adjacent waters or wetlands pursuant to the
12) 29.01.410 Recreational Development (l)(d) "Preference shall be given to the development and enhancement of public access to !Update as suggested
the shoreline to increase fishing, boating, and other waterrelated recreational opportunities." This should be modified to read
"Preference shall be given to the development and enhancement of public access to Increase water-enjoyment recreational
opportunities." This ensures consideration is given to non-boating activities.
13) 29.01.410 Recreational Development l2)(d) "Recreational developments shall be located and designed to preserve, enhance, or \The existing language provides for this aesthetic consideration. No additional
:create scenic views and vistas. Should be modified to read "Recreational developments shall be located and designed to preserve, change planned.
enhance, or create aesthetic enjoyment of the shoreline". Again, it is important to emphasize that a view of the water is not the only
aesthetic consideration.
14) 29.01.420 Residential Development (1) "Single-family residential development Is a preferred use when it is developed in a
manner consistent with SMP provisions." This statement should be deleted. It Is unconscionable given our housing shortage that
multiunit housing be excluded from consideration.
This provision is consistent with state law. RCW 90.58.020 states in part
"Alterations of the natural condition of the shorelines of the state, in those
limited instances when authorized, shall be given priority/or single-family
residences and their appurtenant structures ... " (italics added)
15) 29.01.510 General Provisions (31 la) "All allowed activities shall use reasonable methods supported by the most current scientific IThe existing language provides for this. No additional change planned.
and technical information or accepted BMPs with the least amount of potential impact to the critical areas." This should be modified
to read "All allowed activities shall use reasonable methods supported by the most current scientific and technical information or
accepted BMPs whichever has the least amount of potentlal Impact to the critical areas." This ensures that old and dated practices be
updated to the most current scientific and technical practices.
16) 29.01.510 General Provisions (3)(a)(iii) HRemoval of hazardous trees and vegetation and, when necessary, measures to control or ISee response to Comment 1.
prevent a fire or halt the spread of disease or damaging insects consistent with the State Forest Practices Act; RCW 76.09, provided
l
that no vegetation shall be removed from a critical area or its buffer without approval from the City". This statement should be
deleted and this activity should require a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. An exclusion may be made for control of fires,
flood or storms where immediate danger to property or life exists.
17) 29.01.770 (4)1h)lb) "Eleven thousand two hundred ($11,200) dollars for all other docks constructed in fresh waters." This should IThese are required updates. Falr market value for determining Shoreline
be deleted. Any new dock regardless of size, cost or siting should require a Shoreline Substantial Development Permits Substantial Development permits and dock thresholds is found at
https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/law/wsr/2022/11/22·11•036,htm and
https://app.leg.wa.gov/documents/laws/WSR/2018/21/18-21-013.htm,
Page3 ofS Page 395 of 412
City of Pasco SMP Periodic Review
Comment list
Commlfflt
Number
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Commenter4'
P
41b2
1.01H202
~ • I Cynthia Muse -Citizen of Pasco u 1c earing
4/20/2023-
Public Hearing Peter Rieke -Citizen of Pasco
Ashley M. Morton, M.A., RPA-
4/25/2023 [Confederated Tribes of the
Umatilla Indian Reservation
Email
AsbltyMort;onf!ctuir orr
CommentTopk: Comment Reiponse
18) 29.01.830 Enforcement (3) "The Shoreline Administrator may commence and prosecute enforcement action jointly with Ecology, !See response to Comment 1.
Pursuant to WAC 173-27, Ecology may initiate and prosecute enforcement action separate from the Shoreline Administrator". This
statement is a conflict of interest is the City itself is the offending party. This section should be amended to require Ecology to review
and approve decisions taken by the Shoreline Administrator when the City is responsible for the potential violation.
Why aren't the SMPs being followed? There are public access issues regarding new multi development. The public access is so
important living in a community with a river that runs through it. We are going to keep at this because public access is so critical and I
hope they are kept public as much as possible and not developed.
We appreciate your comments and feedback.
Before the public comment period is over, I think it would be inappropriate for the Planning Commission to take action. I have given I Planning Commission action on the proposed updates will be taken after the
written comment already. The Pasco muncipal code numbered in the document doesn't match what is on the website. One thing I public comment period ends.
will mention tonight -In section 29.01.770dlb-the new addition exdusion for development of $11,200 for all other docks constructed
in fresh waters, This is general and seems like an amendment that could be abused in the future. I think anything on or above the
water should require a permit.
Under 4.4 Shoreline Uses and Modifications Element (121 Recreational Development Polices (b) CTUIR CRPP-recommends adding
"cultural resources".
(13) Residential Development Polices (g) we recommend adding" disturbing cultural resources".
Under 4.6 Historic, Cultural. Scientific, and Educatlonal Resources Element fl) Goals
(a) we recommend adding the following "in compliance with State and Federal laws."
Under 29.D1.460 Utilities 113) please define minor trenching. Based on what the City considers minor, we may have further
comment(s) on this.
Update as suggested
Update as suggested
Update as suggested
Ml nor trenching is defined as up to 2.5 feet wide and 6 feet deep, and less than
100 feet. This definition will be added to the SMP.
Under 29.01.220 Archaeological and Historic Resources 1. While we agree the developer needs to comply with applicable state and Add a new item 1 at the beginning of Section 29.01.220 that states: The City will
federal laws and regulations the City is also required to comply with state and federal regulations and laws. We would like to see in coordinate with tribal, state and federal agencies that maintain inventories of
the City's SMP policy under (2) of this section include that the City will: 1) ensure that shoreline development will provide protection known significant historic, cultural and archaeological sites, and work with these
to sites and areas that have historic, cultural, and archaeological value in compliance with state and federal laws and 2) as part of the agencies in the permit review process in complying with state and federal
shoreline permit application review process, coordinate with tribal, State, and Federal agencies that maintain inventories of known regulations and laws to protect sites and areas that have historic, cultural, and
significant historic, cultural, and archaeological sites. archaeological values. Existing policies also reinforce this action, as written, so
no additional changes planned.
Page4 ofS Page 396 of 412
City Council Workshop
July 10, 2023Page 397 of 412
SMP Update
Shoreline Master Program -Periodic Update
Page 398 of 412
Shoreline Management Act (SMA) and Shoreline
Master Program (SMP)
Periodic Review Limited Amendments
Process and Schedule
SMP Next Steps
Overview
Page 399 of 412
What is an SMP?
SMA
RCW 90.58
To prevent harm caused by uncoordinated and
piecemeal development of the state’s major shorelines
SMP Guidelines
Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 127-26
SMP –Carries out provisions of SMA
Must be approved by Department of Ecology (Ecology),
consistent with RCW 90.58 and WAC 127-26
standards and criteriaPage 400 of 412
Shoreline Jurisdiction
Stream flows greater than
20 cubic feet per second
Lakes greater than 20 acres
Upland areas 200 feet from
ordinary high water mark
Floodways and adjacent
floodplain areas
Associated wetlandsPage 401 of 412
Balance
•Environmental protection
•Public access
•Water-oriented uses
Key Principles of the SMP
Page 402 of 412
Goals and policies
◦Economic, access, uses, conservation, and others
Regulations
◦Environment designations
◦General, use-specific, and modification
regulations
◦Critical area regulations
◦Applicability and implementation
(non-conforming use, enforcement)
Shoreline Master Program Content
Page 403 of 412
SMP last updated in 2015
Local agency and public outreach
Prepare changes in joint review process with Ecology
60-day Department of Commerce Notice –2/24 to 4/25/2023
Local adoption of SMP limited amendments after Ecology
Determination of Consistency issued
Deadline for adopting the updated SMPs is June 30, 2023
Overview of SMP Update Process Page 404 of 412
Periodic review process focuses on limited
amendments that provide administrative
consistency and clarity to the SMP
Ecology SMP Checklist updates for consistency
with SMA changes
Updates consistent with local planning needs
Minor changes for consistency and clarity
between sections
Limited Amendments Summary
Page 405 of 412
Changes in state regulations since the 2015 SMP was adopted
Guidance from Ecology
Input by City
Public and stakeholder feedback
Where do the proposed revisions come
from?Page 406 of 412
Reference current state law for fish passage improvement projects.
Update dollar values for “development” and for docks using latest
State Office of Financial Management information.
Clarify that only removing structures is not considered “development.”
Add exceptions for remedial actions, boatyard improvements, and WSDOT projects.
Add new section for non conforming lots
Draft Revisions
Page 407 of 412
Ecology issues Determination of Consistency
City adopt amendments
Final SMP goes to Ecology
SMP User Guide also being prepared (not required; grant funded)
◦Key elements illustrated in color, pictorial guide
◦How buffers, setbacks and other standards applied
◦Responses to frequently asked questions
SMP Next Steps
Page 408 of 412
Questions?Page 409 of 412
AdjournPage 410 of 412
QUALITY OF LIFE
Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re-
investment in community infrastructure including, but not limited to:
• Completion of Transportation System Master Plan and design standard updates to promote greater
neighborhood cohesion in new and re-developed neighborhoods through design elements, e.g.;
connectivity, walkability, aesthetics, sustainability, and community gathering spaces.
• Completion of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan and development of an implementation
strategy to enhance such services equitably across the community. • Completion of the Housing Action and Implementation Plan with a focus on a variety of housing to address
the needs of the growing population.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services and programs, including, but not
limited to:
• Adopting policies and strategic investment standards to assure consistency of long-range planning to include
update of impact fees, area fees to specific infrastructure, and SEPA mitigation measures related to new
development, e.g.; schools, traffic, parks, and fire.
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system including, but not limited to:
• Application of the adopted Transportation System Master Plan including development of policies, regulations,
programs, and projects that provide for greater connectivity, strategic investment, mobility, multi -modal
systems, accessibility, efficiency, and safety.
COMMUNITY SAFETY
Promote proactive approaches for the strategic investment of infrastructure, staffing, and equipment
including, but not limited to:
• Adoption and develop implementation strategies for Comprehensive Fire Master Plan aimed at maintaining the
current Washington State Rating Bureau Class 3 community rating.
• Collaboration with regional partners to influence strategies to reduce incidences of homeless by leveraging
existing resources such as the newly implemented 0.1% mental health sales tax, use of resource navigator
programs, and other efforts. • Development of an implementation strategy for the Comprehensive Police Master Plan to support future service
levels of the department to assure sustainability, public safety, officer safety, crime control, and compliance
with legislative mandates.
ECONOMIC VITALITY
Promote and encourage economic vitality including, but not limited to:
• Implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan through related actions including zoning code changes,
phased sign code update, and development regulations and standards.
• Completion of Area Master Plans and environmental analysis complementing the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan such as Downtown and Broadmoor Master Plans.
• Development of an Economic Development Plan, including revitalization efforts.
COMMUNITY IDENTITY
Identify opportunities to enhance community identity, cohesion, and image including, but not limited to:
• Development of a Community Engagement Plan to evaluate strategies, technologies, and other opportunities
to further inclusivity, community engagement, and inter-agency and constituent coordination efforts.
• Support of the Arts and Culture Commission in promoting unity and the celebration of diversity through art
and culture programs, recognition of significant events or occurrences, and participation/sponsorship of events
within the community.
Page 411 of 412
CALIDAD DE VIDA
Promover una calidad de vida alta a través de programas de calidad, servicios, inversiones y reinversiones
apropiadas en la infraestructura de la comunidad incluyendo, pero no limitado a:
• Terminar el Plan de Transportación para promover más cohesión entre nuestras vecindades actuales y re-desarrolladas
a través de elementos de diseño, p.ej. conectividad, transitabilidad, sostenibilidad estética, y espacios para reuniones
comunitarias.
• Terminar el Plan de los Parques, la Recreación, y los Espacios Vacíos y el desarrollo de una estrategia de
implementación para mejorar tales servicios justamente a lo largo de la comunidad.
• Terminar el Plan de Acción e Implementación de Viviendas con un enfoque en una variedad de viviendas para tratar las
necesidades del aumento en la población.
SOSTENIBIILIDAD FINANCIERA
Mejorar la viabilidad a largo plazo, el valor, y los niveles de los servicios y los programas, incluyendo, pero no
limitado a:
• Adoptar las políticas y los estándares de inversión estratégica para asegurar consistencia en la planificación a largo
plazo para incluir la actualización de las tarifas de impacto, las tarifas en áreas de infraestructura específica, y las
medidas de mitigación SEPA relacionadas con el nuevo desarrollo, p.ej. escuelas, tráfico, parques, e incendios.
RED DE TRANSPORTACION COMUNITARIA
Promover un sistema de transportación multimodal en alta operación incluyendo, pero no limitado a:
• Aplicar el Plan de Transportación que fue adoptado, incluyendo el desarrollo de las políticas, las reglas, los programas,
y los proyectos que proporcionan más conectividad, inversión estratégica, movilidad, sistemas multimodales,
accesibilidad, eficiencia, y seguridad.
SEGURIDAD COMUNITARIA
Promover métodos proactivos para la inversión estratégica en la infraestructura, el personal, y el equipo
incluyendo, pero no limitado a:
• Adoptar y desarrollar estrategias de implementación para el Plan Comprehensivo para Incendios. Con el propósito de
mantener la clasificación comunitaria actual en la tercera Clase del Departamento de Clasificación del Estado de
Washington.
• Colaborar con socios regionales para influenciar estrategias que reduzcan los incidentes de personas sin hogar al
hacer uso de los recursos actuales como el impuesto de ventas de 0.1% implementado recientemente para la salud
mental, el uso de programas para navegar los recursos, y otros esfuerzos.
• Desarrollar una estrategia de implementación para el Plan Comprehensivo de la Policía para apoyar los niveles futuros
de servicio del departamento para asegurar la sostenibilidad, la seguridad pública, la seguridad de los policías, el
control de crímenes, y el cumplimiento con los mandatos legislativos.
VITALIDAD ECONOMICA
Promover y fomentar vitalidad económica incluyendo, pero no limitado a:
• Implementar el Plan Comprehensivo del Uso de Terreno a través de acciones relacionadas, incluyendo cambios de los
códigos de zonificación, actualización en las etapas de los códigos de las señales, y el desarrollo de las reglas y los
estándares.
• Terminar los Planes de las Áreas y un análisis ambiental el cual complementa al plan integral de uso de la tierra como a
los Planes del Centro y de Broadmoor.
• Desarrollar un Plan de Desarrollo Económico, el cual incluya esfuerzos de revitalización.
IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA
Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la cohesión, y la imagen incluyendo, pero no
limitado a:
• Desarrollar un Plan de Participación de la Comunidad para evaluar las estrategias, las tecnologías, y otras
oportunidades para promover la inclusividad, la participación de la comunidad, y los esfuerzos interdepartamentales y de
coordinación de los constituyentes.
• Apoyar a la Comisión de las Artes y Cultura al promover la unidad y la celebración de la diversidad a través de
programas de arte y cultura, reconocer eventos o acontecimientos significantes, y participar/patrocinar eventos dentro
de la comunidad.
Page 412 of 412