The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2022.09.06 Council Meeting Public Comment Submissions Comments for Public Hearing - Debra Barham Related to 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments From: noreply@civicplus.com Recieved after 9.2.2�22 Sent: Monday, September 5, 2022 4:53 PT71 — To: Debra Barham;WebSiteContacts Subject: Online Form Submittal:Contact the City Clerk [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Pasco--DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Contact the City Clerk To confact the City Clerk for the City of Pasco, Washington, please complete the form below and click Submit. We request that you use the AskPasco apA here to better track your request. Name: Tom Van Dorn Email: panman48@charter.net Subject: Proposal#CPA2022-012 Comment: I have lived at 400 N Road 36 Pasco, Wa. 99301 for 25 years. I am not in support of this proposal to change Low Density Residential to High Density Residential at these properties south of Hopkins Street and Road 34. The High Density Residential would not be compatible with the now existing Low Density Residential single family homes.This proposal would bring in a very high traffic volume and the opportunity for more neighborhood crime.At the June 16, 2022 meeting, the applicant stated there was access to this property from Highway 395 and Road 34. There is no connection to this property from Highway 395 or Road 34.This property is land locked by the river dike, the Moore Mansion and residential homes. At the June 16, 2022 meeting, Jay Hendler recused himself from this issue due to conflict of issue. After the council moved onto the next issue about three quarters of the audience left the meeting.The council stated this item on the agenda was for submission on the proposal only. Yet, at the end of the meeting, I was told, since I left with everyone else, a vote was held on this proposal. And, after recusing himself from participating in this proposal, Jay Hendler vote for this proposal. Again , this is what I was told by someone that � stayed for the complete meeting. I urge the council to stop the progress of this proposal CPA2022-012. P/ease note: The information you provide may be subject to disclosure according to the Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW. Email not displaying correctly?View it in vour browser, 2 Comments for Public Hearing - Related to Debra Barham 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Recieved after 9.2.2022 From: noreply@civicplus.com Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 623 PM To: Debra Barham;WebSiteContacts Subject: Online Form Submittal: Contact the City Clerk [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Pasco-- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Contact the City Clerk To contact the City Clerk for the City of Pasco, Washington, please complete the form beJow and click Submif. We request that you use the As r�asco a here to better track your request. Name: D. Hans Email: Hansd5889@gmail.com Subject: Opposition to Proposed amendments Comment: Public hearing 6 September 2022 Opposition and Concerns to the Re-Zoning of Land In Riverhaven Neighborhood Pasco, Washington 2022 September 6 Public Hearing A proposed amendment to City of Pasco development plan and Future Land Use Map for 2018-2038 aims to add lands south of 34th and located in the Riverhaven neighborhood to be re- zoned. From low density residential to high density residential. The reason for the proposed changes, is to build a four-story apartment complex along the river in the lands just west of the Moore Mansion. Residents of Riverhaven, the neighborhood which is a part of this plan are opposed to the plan for reasons arising from the following concerns: 1. How will increases in density and population, resulting from the high-density residential development affect existing rates of property crime in this jurisdiction (Riverhaven). 1 2. What plans are in place to handle increases in traffic/congestion and pedestrians. 3. What impacts will this have on existing home values in the area. a.According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)online Crime Data Explorer(CDE), which measures annual crime rates in the United States and indicates as of 2020 there are 2109.9(Washington 2734) property crimes per 100,000 people. The U.S. Census has the population of Pasco, Washington as of 2022 at around 80,000 with annual growth rate of 2.20%= 1700 new residents on average yearly. Meaning It is statistically significant that an increase in density will result in a proclivity for an increase in property crimes in the area that is higher than the normal rate of property crimes for the ciry, as a result of more people being included in less space. "Property Crimes." Crime, 1 Jan. 2020, crime-data- explorer.fr.cloud.gov/pages/home. -b.The City of Pasco has yet to provide sufficient details on how the proposed amendment and rezoning will deal with the increases in traffic and congestion resulting from a high density building that is currently proposed to be built on a dead-end street. -c. It is proven that increase in property crime which Washington already ranks as one of the highest, does have a negative affect and directly impact existing home values resulting in tangible losses for the current residents of Riverhaven from higher than normal crime rates. Figure 1:The area for the proposed rezoning is indicated by a Star symbol. Courtesy City of Pasco Figure 2: https://www.statista.com/statistics/232575/property- crime-rate-i n-the-us-by-state/ Please nofe: The information you provide may be subject to disclosure according to the Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW Email not displaying correctly?View it in your browser. 2 ��Q,� �;�' � 1��?�Zz- �r�� M�� THIS IS A PETITTION TO BURLINGTON NORTHERN TO CLEAR THE FIELD FROM 13T" LANE TO A STREET . ASKING THAT ALL DEAD TREES BE REMOVED, THAT ALL RUSSIAN OLIVE TREES BE REMOVED AND THAT THE FIEID BE MOWED YEARLY FOR THE SAFETY�F THE COMMUNITY AND BUSINESSES IN THE AREA AND ALSO FOR THE SAFETY OF THE PEOPLE WHO USE THE PATH WHICH RUNS PARELLEL TO IT. SIGNATURES AND ADRESSES f 2 2� � � l 3� L�l. �aS�� t,�r< '�' �� 1. - � � , ��,� �'t z. � . wP� ��f08 W . !(�� r . ,?� � ��n � �� /�)�/� 3. -�'„�" ri �r� �G�.!�-11_6'1'1,�YI �'1 1 o�v�.� .� � �� /� �.�� `v7� / � � 4. � ,��c��- ► z r � s j?,"�''' �-, �s� �e, 5. 6. � /�- �� l �� .� � �. �� 8 �� --� � �3 s �� P.�sco 9 � v�-� �� a 1O. 1 ,� � �Uls �,��f._.J.J wL-�J� �\��1, � ��. � a �� 11. �� i��',� �°a�h �� . � � 1z. � �� /' � 13. N.�� , c-� c' ��c., 1 �3 i��J ��.�s,�.�.� F�.S� � a�i 3 0 � 15. y��j �N,�1 ��>�e /�,f�l,��'12� �,lf��. 16. �(/� ��j �Z�� `� �� -� �GI�S(,� �� {�c�d � ��. i�<< x � �i�,�-��.f �� -�� . ISZd�� R� �s�o �-�h -s� � . ��Scv -t��°I�3r,� �g. �� 19. r YJ �/ ��. (�c� . t� � � �� ash� �,� � zo. �ed � � p � w� � � ,� �� ,� ' � �I�f'#r�r. t jr Fr�.,�;� Al�ce Koen�g �::, . , �. ., ,:�,� � _��«,��.c�ar� v :- �� Future Larid Use Prt�positit�n, Fi1e ##1: � � CPA�022-d12 Sep 4, 2022 at 7:16:79 PM ��o cornpplan�pasco-�nra.gav Pasco Community Development Department September 1, 2022 Greetings, I am writing on the Future Land Use Proposition, File #1: CPA2022-412 regarding future land use from tow density housing to high density housing South of W. Hopkins Street and Road 34 in Pasco, WA. l`� � �y I have lived on Rd 34 since 196�4. In that time, I have watchedthe residential area expand and change as more homes have been built in the area. I am not against single family homes being built in this plot of land. I do have an issue with changing the area listed above from low to high density and see it being highly detrimental to our neighborhood. With the increased traffic down Road 34, increased noise, and neighborhood children's safety concerns, as well as a possible changes to ourlandscape (who wants to look at a four-story apartment complex). In addition, #he potential of decreased property valuesby adding high density apartment comptexes are not favorable. No number of trees, fences or walls would provide a proper barrier from the proposed eyesore. The applicant knew this land parcel was zoned for future low�density housing when he purchased the property. lt shauld not be the neighborhQod resident's responsibility to make up for his poor business decision to purchase this land (it was mentioned they cannot get an ROI by putting in low-density housing). Although the applicant noted at the planning meeting tha# they met the criteria with access to Sylvester and Highway 395r access isn't direc# to Highway 395. This would in fact cause most traffic to come down Road 34. 240 apartment units = 480 cars driving down our small road? Unacceptable! Again, I have no issue with #he applicant building single family dwellings on his land. However, the property was never intended to be an area for a four-story apartment complex. ��s��•� �v;�.4-es 3�3 N� �°�l �S � � ? 2� � `� � _ e G � Yri��e 1-10� �M rls 3��7 GcJ� �'la�,�i y�S In addition, l am so what oncerne himself from #his land use issue at the June 16th meeting, only to notice he vo#ed in favor of the land-use change after the outpouring of neighborhood cancerns. Sketchy play indeed! , � ,� -�� 1< �,�1�<<r� �4�� es� bpl�� , Th nk you f r your time, �` �,� o � ��" l��c.,.�,rp,��a�'�(a Alice Till Koe ig � � �c 320 Road 34 ° �,, r �� ,�� Z �I� �c�� , Pasco WA 99301 r `� � -�'J ► ��T G� 1_�'s� s�s �7�5 I� l��s ��1�,fi�. ��s� �7� vv I��-vst�� srt. ��s�a �,�. �� 6 � Sent from m iP�one Y e �� 1� �o�'� uob �1 'CZ.o Q� � 6 '��S�� `,� '�, ��30� � �� / � � �� j)� ��' �`� �5�1� (A�� c/� �/ � l� C��-� s � W �` 1�� 0 ,S�r� �Q.� n� r�� 3 � �� ,�r �...¢Ks,�,�A 33 Z , �. y.�x, �,,; w�. 9 9:�Q� � -�yg h�,��?�c �� -�, � ��`� ,. �ta.��-r� aur�� 3 3 `c� ��,,�,,,�,� � �� `'`��`a�<�� ' �v� r�d �� r,�;��,,�GJ 3 � �� o s �. �� ,� � , �� ► .�� , � �� a�u�� 33 � � ; � 5� � � ., �� - �.,co �� y ��. 3` �- ..�� `� �S3 �- Z � r3 � �� s � �' r� � �� l � t� ��