The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2022.06.06 Council Meeting PacketAGENDA City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, June 6, 2022 City Council Chambers & GoToWebinar Page 1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Individuals, who would like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco-wa.gov/publiccomment) to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of this meeting. To listen to the meeting via phone, call (631) 992-3211 and use access code 613-585-088. City Council meetings are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco- wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco. 2. CALL TO ORDER 3. ROLL CALL a) Pledge of Allegiance 4. CONSENT AGENDA - All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Council members or the public, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered separately. 6 - 21 (a) Approval of Meeting Minutes To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting held on May 16, 2022, and, Special Meeting and Regular Workshop held on May 23, 2022. 22 - 23 (b) Bills and Communications Page 1 of 318 To approve claims in the total amount of $4,572,929.93 ($2,832,909.72 in Check Nos. 248486-248853; $785,846.15 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 835565-835600, 835648-835683, 835689-835757, 835759- 835830, 835838-835973, 835979-835982; $10,552.74 in Check Nos. 53909-53918; $943,621.32 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30175277 - 30175837). RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 6. VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS - This item is provided to allow citizens the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for debate or for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate response. Some questions require consideration by Council over time and after a deliberative process with input from a number of different sources; some questions are best directed to staff members who have access to specific information. Citizen comments will normally be limited to three minutes each by the Mayor. Those with lengthy messages are invited to summarize their comments and/or submit written information for consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings. 7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers 24 - 25 (b) HAPO Center Energy Improvements Discussion 8. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO 26 - 142 (a) Public Hearing and Ordinance - Lamb 5 LLC Annexation (ANX 2021-007) CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4593, relating to annexation and annexing certain real property to the City of Pasco, and further, authorize publication by summary only. 143 - 155 (b) Public Hearing - Barker Ranch Right-of-Way (ROW) Vacation (VAC 2022-002) CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING Page 2 of 318 MOTION: I move to deny the request for the vacation of a 10-foot right- of-way for Burns Road established per Short Plat 2020-22. 156 - 161 (c) Public Hearing - East Lewis Place Right-of-Way (ROW) Vacation VAC 2022-003) Continue Hearing to July 5, 2022 MOTION: I move to open the public hearing for the East Lewis Place Right-of-Way Vacation (VAC 2022-003) and continue it to the July 5, 2022, Council meeting. 9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS 162 - 176 (a) Q Ordinance - Lamb 5 LLC Zoning Determination of Annexed Property (ZD 2021-007) MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4594, assigning zoning to the Lamb 5 LLC annexation area as recommended by the Hearing Examiner, and further, authorize publication by summary only. 177 - 193 (b) *Resolution - Lease Agreement with Group Health Foundation for Use of City Facilities MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4190, with Group Health Foundation for the Use of City Facilities located at 403 West Lewis Street. 194 - 225 (c) *Resolution - Change Order No. 1 to the Design Build of America Phase 1 Agreement for the Zone 3 Water Storage Reservoir Project MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4191, authorizing the City Manager to execute Change Order No. 1 to the Design Build Institute of America Phase 1 Agreement with T Bailey, Inc. for the Progressive Design-Build services for the Zone 3 Water Storage Reservoir project. 226 - 228 (d) *Resolution - Acceptance of Work for Chapel Hill Park Project, Renamed Palomino Park MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4192, accepting work performed by Total Site Services, under contract for Chapel Hill Boulevard Park Project, currently known as Palomino Park. 229 - 233 (e) *Resolution - Ratify Emergency Order Related to COVID-19 and Conducting Public Meetings MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4193, ratifying Emergency Order No. 2020-006.2, relating to conducting public meetings. 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Page 3 of 318 234 - 288 (a) Utility Extension in the Unincorporated Islands & Urban Growth Area (UGA) Discussion 11. NEW BUSINESS 289 - 316 (a) *2023-2028 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan 317 (b) *Council Appointment Process for Council Position No. 3, Voting District No. 3 12. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION a) Discussion with Legal Counsel about Current or Potential Litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) and Performance of a Public Employee per RCW 42.30.110(1)(g) (30 minutes) 14. ADJOURNMENT 15. ADDITIONAL NOTES a) (RC) Roll Call Vote Required Item not previously discussed Q Quasi-Judicial Matter MF# “Master File #....” 318 (b) Adopted 2020-2021 Council Goals (Reference Only) c) REMINDERS Monday, June 6, 1:30 PM: Emergency Medical Services Board Meeting – Fire Training Center, 1811 S. Ely, Kennewick (COUNCILMEMBER PETE SERRANO, Rep.) Thursday, June 9, 4:30 PM: Pasco School District (PSD) Skilled & Technical Advisory Committee – Virtual COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE) Thursday, June 9, 7:00 PM: Ben Franklin Transit Board Meeting – Transit Facility (COUNCILMEMBER JOSEPH CAMPOS Rep.; MAYOR PRO TEM CRAIG MALONEY, Alt.) Monday, June 13, 11:45 AM: Pasco Chamber of Commerce Membership Lunch Meeting – Pasco Red Lion Hotel This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Page 4 of 318 Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.) Page 5 of 318 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 1, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Debra Barham, City Clerk Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Approval of Meeting Minutes I. REFERENCE(S): 05.16.2022 & 05.23.2022 Draft Council Minutes II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting held on May 16, 2022, and, Special Meeting and Regular Workshop held on May 23, 2022. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 6 of 318 MINUTES City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, May 16, 2022 City Council Chambers & GoToWebinar CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Blanche Barajas, Mayor. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Blanche Barajas, Craig Maloney, Joseph Campos, Pete Serrano, Nikki Torres, David Milne, and Zahra Roach Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Adam Lincoln, Deputy City Manager; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; Zach Ratkai, Administrative & Community Services Director; Brent Cook, Deputy Police Chief; Darcy Buckley, Finance Manager; Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director; Steve Worley, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Meeting Minutes To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting and Regular Workshop held on May 2, 2022 and May 9, 2022 respectively. Bills and Communications To approve claims in the total amount of $4,744,145.74 ($2,540,738.07 in Check Nos. 248217-248485; $1,260,950.56 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 835632, 835638, 835641, 835686-835688, 835758; $17,859.84 in Check Nos. 53891-53908; 923,627.70 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30174725-30175276; $223.86 in Electronic Transfer Nos.878-879; $745.71 in Electronic Transfers Nos. 164-166). Page 1 of7Page7of318 To approve bad debt write-off for Utility Billing, Ambulance, Cemetery, General Accounts, Miscellaneous Accounts, and Municipal Court (non-criminal, criminal, and parking) accounts receivable in the total amount of $178,802.72 and, of that amount, authorize $0.00 to be turned over for collection. Resolution - Council Goals for 2022-2023 To approve Resolution No. 4182, establishing primary Council Goals for the ensuing calendar years of 2022-2023. Resolution - Process Water Reuse Facility (PWRF): Beus Release of Interest Agreement To approve Resolution No. 4183, authorizing the City Manager to sign and execute the Process Water Reuse Facility Agreement with Don and Quella Beus and Beus Farms, Inc. for the release of interest in the United States Bureau of Reclamation Parcel No. 113080058. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Campos to approve the Consent Agenda as read. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Presentation of Proclamation for Public Works Week Mayor Barajas read the proclamation declaring Public Works Week from May 15 to May 21, 2022. Next, she presented the proclamation to Dustin Wittman, Project Support Specialist from the Pasco Public Works Department. VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS Mr. Gabriel Portugal, Pasco resident and the Downtown Pasco Development Authority DPDA) Chair, commented on the recent Cinco de Mayo festival and thanked the DPDA Board and City staff for their help in making this festival a success. Mr. Dallas Barnes, Pasco resident, expressed concern of the Code Enforcement's policies and procedures, specifically, the allowance of complainants to remain anonymous when complaining about issues that the property owner(s) did not create. He also expressed concern about the short time schedule to correct the code issue. Candy Jones, Richland resident, commented about the Tri -Cities Animal Control Shelter and expressed concern about holding a cat for 45 days without a veterinarian examination and stated that the old shelter is deplorable and the need for a new shelter Page 2 of7Page8of318 is great, but not to renovate the building next to BFHS. She requested that Council request an external entity to review its policies and procedures. Angela Zilar, West Richland resident and former Tri-Cities Animal Control Services contractor, asked questions to Council regarding the Tri-Cities Animal Control Shelter, the proposed auxiliary shelter, the current personal services agreement and the duties of the animal control services. Ms. Zilar submitted her written comments to City Clerk Barham. Mr. Felix Vargas, Pasco resident, commented on recent Cinco de Mayo event and the Code Enforcement requirements and the need for flexibility with the vulnerable population (seniors, persons with disabilities, single parents, etc.) Mr. Damien Davis, Franklin County Historical Society & Museum Executive Director, invited everyone to "Dinner under the Dome" fundraising event for the museum scheduled for Saturday, May 21st at the Franklin County Court House. Ms. Nicole Hornbuckle, Pasco resident, commented on the Tri-Cities Animal Control Shelter, animal neglect and the need for a better place to house cats and dogs. Christie Kessler, Kennewick resident, commented on the Tri-Cities Animal Control Shelter stating that the shelter is in crisis and a new facility is needed now. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS Verbal Reports from Councilmembers Ms. Torres reported on Columbia River Walk Apartments and Lolita's Childcare Center ribbon cutting events held the past Friday and Saturday respectively. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney commented on a meeting with the Deputy City Manager and Gordon Thomas Honeywell staff regarding the City's legislative priorities in preparation for his upcoming meeting with the AWC Legislative Priorities Committee. Ms. Roach announced that the Visit Tri-Cities Executive Director Michael Novakovich announced that he has accepted a new position and the search for a new Executive Director is underway. Mr. Campos commented on the Ben Franklin Transit Board meeting, as well as the Tri-Cities art event benefiting the Tri-Cities Union Gospel Mission that he recently attended. Mr. Serrano announced Sebastian Gutierrez, a 2016 Pasco High graduate, recently signed with the Denver Bronco's football team. He applauded Mr. Gutierrez for reaching this incredible goal and for making Pasco proud of his perseverance and achievements. Page 3 of7Page9of318 Mr. Milne commented on the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board meeting he recently attended. Mayor Barajas announced that Pasco is recruiting for Police Officer positions. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS Resolution - Regional Pavement Cut Policy Mr. Worley stated that he met with the developer's at a monthly meeting and everyone was supportive. Council and Mr. Worley briefly discussed the proposed policy. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Campos to approve Resolution No. 4165, adopting the Regional Pavement Cut Policy and Revision to Pasco's Design and Construction Standards and Specifications for Public Works Improvements. RESULT: Motion carried 6-1 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach NAYS: Councilmember Serrano Resolution - Fourth Amendment to NW Baseball Ventures I, LLC for GESA Stadium Lease Mr. Ratkai provided a brief report regarding the proposed one-year extension of the GESA Stadium Lease with NW Baseball Ventures I, LLC, which runs the Dust Devils Baseball team. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Roach to approve Resolution No. 4184, authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 4 to the term of the GESA Stadium Lease with the Northwest NW) Baseball Ventures I, LLC. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach Resolution - Purchase and Sale Agreement - Heritage Boulevard Property Mr. Ratkai provided a brief report on the sale of City undeveloped real property located on Heritage Boulevard. Page 4 of7Page10of318 Mr. Serrano noted that the purchaser of this property is his friend. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Campos MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 4185, authorizing the sale of property located at Heritage Boulevard, Pasco, Washington and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the associated closing documents. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Mayor Barajas, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach Resolution - Setting a Public Hearing Date to consider the East Lewis Place ROW Vacation (VAC 2022-003) Mr. White provided a report on proposed right-of-way vacation. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Milne to approve Resolution No. 4186, setting 7:00 P.M., Monday, June 6, 2022 as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating right-of-way for East Lewis Place formerly primary State Highway No. 3, Pasco to Attalia. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach UNFINISHED BUSINESS East UGA Sewer Local Improvement District (LID) Expansion Assessment Alternatives Mr. Worley introduced Capital Improvements Program Manager Maria Serra who provided a brief presentation on the possible alternatives for the propose East Urban Growth Area (UGA) Expansion Sewer Local Improvement District (LID). Council and staff commented on the proposed alternative options for the proposed LID. NEW BUSINESS Resolution - Process Water Reuse Facility (PWRF) + Renewable Natural Gas RNG) Request for Proposals (RFP) – Ratification of Selected Respondent Mr. Worley announced that a packet of all the Process Water Reuse Facility PWRF) projects was handed out to Council at their dais seats. He provided a Page 5 of7Page11of318 summary of the Request for Proposals (RFP) for the PWRF and Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) noting that both respondents of the RFP were responsive and considered qualified to move on to the next steps in the process. Council and staff briefly discussed the process for this action. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Serrano to approve Resolution No. 4187, related to the Process Water Reuse Facility to Renewable Natural Gas Request for Proposals and which includes the following items: Ratification of the following items: 1. Publication of notices (RFP) on March 17 and March 24, 2022. 2. The evaluation criteria within the RFP is appropriate for the subject project. 3. The two proposals received are considered qualified and responsive. And approval for staff to conduct a 'bidder's conference' to: 1. Assure respondents have a full understanding of the proposals. 2. Make respondents aware of any changes in the RFP. 3. Allow respondents a reasonable opportunity to revise their proposals for the purpose of obtaining the best and final proposals. And to begin negotiations of a contract with the selected respondent whose proposal it determines to be the most advantageous to the City. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION Ms. Roach announced that she will be out of town during next week's Council workshop and will attend remotely. RECESS Mayor Barajas called a five-minute recess at 8:27 PM. EXECUTIVE SESSION Council adjourned into Executive Session at 8:32 PM for ten (10) minutes to discuss the consideration of site selection or acquisition of real estate purchase or lease if likelihood that disclosure would increase price per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) and the performance of a public employee per RCW 42.30.110(1)(g) with the City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Community & Economic Development and the City Attorney. Page 6 of7Page12of318 At 8:42 PM Mayor Barajas announced that the Executive Session would continue for another five minutes. Mayor Barajas called the meeting back to order at 8:47 PM. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:47 PM. PASSED and APPROVED this ____ day of ________________, 20__. APPROVED: ATTEST: Blanche Barajas, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk Page 7 of7Page13of318 MINUTES City Council Special Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, May 23, 2022 City Council Chambers & GoToWebinar CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Blanche Barajas, Mayor. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Blanche Barajas, Craig Maloney, Joseph Campos, Pete Serrano, David Milne, Nikki Torres, and Zahra Roach Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: Colleen Chapin, Human Resources Director; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; Ed Dunbar, Deputy Fire Chief; Richa Sigdel, Finance Director & Acting City Manager; Steve Worley, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO Public Hearing and Ordinance - Eickmeyer-Roundy Annexation (ANX 2022- 002) Planning Manager Jacob Gonzalez provided a brief report regarding the proposed annexation File No. ANX 2022-002. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney asked about the zoning determination process of the property after it is annexed into the City and Mr. Gonzalez explained the process. Mayor Barajas declared the Public Hearing open to consider the proposed Eickmeyer-Roundy Annexation (ANX 2022-002). K.R. Mars, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to the annexation and asked that his property be excluded from it. Page 1 of5Page14of318 Steve Bauman, Franklin County resident, asked if the proposed annexation will create any donut holes of unincorporated Franklin County land and expressed opposition to such donut holes. Patrick Dean, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to the annexation and asked that his property be excluded from it. Jeff Pittman, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to the annexation and asked that his property be excluded from it. David Wilson, Pasco resident and property owner of land located within the proposed annexation, expressed support for the annexation. Devin Lybbert, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to the annexation and asked that his property be excluded from it. Christian Ford, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to the annexation and asked that his property be excluded from it. Jeff Lotto, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to the annexation and asked that his property be excluded from it. He questioned why the City was moving forward in the annexation property in that area while it is in litigation with Futurewise. Shane Gulley, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to the annexation and asked that his property be excluded from it. Following three calls for comments, and there being none, Mayor Barajas declared the Public Hearing closed. Council, Mr. Ferguson and Mr. Gonzalez continued discussing the proposed annexation, the annexation process, and proposed donut holes created if the annexation is passed. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Campos to adopt Ordinance No. 4591, relating to annexation and annexing certain real property to the City of Pasco, and further, authorize publication by summary only. RESULT: Motion carried by Roll Call vote 4-3 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, and Councilmember Roach NAYS: Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Torres Page 2 of5Page15of318 Public Hearing and Ordinance for Formation of Sewer LID in the East UGA Expansion Area Mr. Worley and Capital Improvements Projects Manager Serra provided a brief report on the proposed sewer expansion Local Improvement District (LID) in the east Urban Growth Area (UGA). Council and Ms. Serra briefly continued the discussion regarding the two options of the proposed LID. Mayor Barajas declared the Public Hearing open to consider the proposed formation of a sewer LID in the East UGA expansion area. Josef Christ, owner of vacant property on Kau Trail, expressed opposition to Option A of the LID and stated that he did receive any notifications until April 29th regarding the proposed LID and expressed concern of poor communication from the City for this action. Todd Blackman, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to Option A of the LID. Emma Katz, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to Option A of the LID and she stated that she did not receive any notifications. Luke Cortinez, speaking for his father and mother, stated that they are are opposed to the LID Option A. Jeff Lotto, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to Option A of the LID Steve Bauman, expressed appreciation to City staff for the communications efforts made in notifying the property owners that may be affected by the proposed LID. Steven Tate, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to Option A of the LID. Chris McClure, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to Option A of the LID. Tronalie Tate, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to Option A of the LID. Shane Gulley, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to Option A of the LID. Paul Allen, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to Option A of the LID. Nathan Haus, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to Option A of the LID. Page 3 of5Page16of318 Shannon Lotto, Franklin County resident, expressed opposition to Option A of the LID. Following three calls for comments, and there being none, Mayor Barajas declared the Public Hearing closed. Mr. Campos and Mayor Barajas thanked everyone for coming forward to speak. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Milne to adopt Ordinance No. 4592, relating to improvements for a new sanitary sewer main, lift station, and other sewer improvements in the City’s East Urban Growth Area (UGA) Expansion (collectively, the “improvements”); ordering the improvements of full sanitary sewer construction consistent with City Council Resolution No. 4174; establishing Local Improvement District No. 152, and ordering the carrying out of the proposed improvements; providing that payment for the improvements be made by special assessments upon the property in the district, payable by the mode of “payment by bonds;” and, providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement district warrants redeemable in cash or other short-term financing and local improvement district bonds for Option B, as presented, and further, authorize publication by summary only. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Milne, Councilmember Torres, and Councilmember Roach RECESS Mayor Barajas declared a five-minute recess at 8:48 PM. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS Resolution - One Washington Memorandum of Understanding with Washington State Municipalities Mr. Ferguson explained the purpose of the proposed Memorandum of Understanding related to opioid abatement from the communities harmed by entities within the pharmaceutical supply chain who manufacture, distribute and dispense prescription opioids. Council and staff held a brief question and answer period. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Serrano to approve Resolution No. 4188, approving the One Washington Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Washington State municipalities and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the MOU. Page 4 of5Page17of318 RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Milne, Councilmember Torres, and Councilmember Roach Resolution - Amendment to the Emergency Personal Services Agreement with Benton Franklin Humane Society for Animal Control Services Mr. Ferguson stated that the amendment to extend the emergency PSA for another 45 days is a housekeeping action in order to negotiate and prepare a two -year Animal Control Services agreement. Council commented on the current Animal Control Services agreement, the current services being provided, proposed actions for future services and oversight of the contractor. Ms. Sigdel stated that as the two-year Animal Control Services agreement is being drafted, staff will provide an update to Council prior to Council taking final action on the agreement. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Campos to approve Resolution No. 4189, authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the emergency Personal Services Agreement with the Benton Franklin Humane Society for animal control and sheltering services to extend the agreement. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Milne, Councilmember Torres, and Councilmember Roach ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:18 PM. PASSED and APPROVED this __ day of ________________, 20__. APPROVED: ATTEST: Blanche Barajas, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk Page 5 of5Page18of318 MINUTES City Council Workshop Meeting 7:15 PM - Monday, May 23, 2022 City Council Chambers & GoToWebinar CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 9:18 PM by Blanche Barajas, Mayor. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Blanche Barajas, Craig Maloney, Joseph Campos, Pete Serrano, David Milne, Zahra Roach, and Nikki Torres Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: Colleen Chapin, Human Resources Director; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; Ed Dunbar, Deputy Fire Chief; Richa Sigdel, Finance Director & Acting City Manager; Steve Worley, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS Mayor Barajas commented on the Hanford B Reactor she toured earlier in the day. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Presentation - Domestic Violence Services of Benton & Franklin Counties (10 minutes) Ms. Sigdel introduced Angie Pacheco, Executive Director from the Domestic Violence Services of Benton & Franklin Counties. Ms. Pacheco provided an update on statistics of domestic violence victims, as well as services provided for domestic violence survivors within the greater Tri -Cities area. She announced that DVSBFC is in the process of reaching out within Franklin County and the City of Pasco and sought assistance from the City for property and/or land to house domestic violence survivors. Angel Montelongo shared her family's story of domestic violence involving her sister and nephews. Page 1 of3Page19of318 Jerry Cochrane and Amber Rodriguez, DVSBFC Board Members, spoke about DVSBFC about their experiences with DVSBFC. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney expressed support for DVSBFC presence in Pasco, possibly at MLK Center after it is renovated. Mayor Barajas shared her story of surviving domestic violence and she expressed support of DVSBFC presence in Pasco. Diana Izaguirre, Development Director with DVSBFC, announced the Charity Golf Tournament at Canyon Lakes Golf Course benefiting DVSBFC scheduled for June 24th. Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Update - Transportation Impacts to East Pasco Commercial Development City Engineer Dan Ford provided an update to the City's Transportation Improvement Plan and the impacts of traffic in the East Pasco Commercial area. Council and staff briefly spoke about the issues with the intersections of SR-12 and A Street, SR-12 Tank/Sacajawea Road, and potential extension of Road 40 East to SR-12. AskPasco App Presentation Moved to a Future Workshop Mayor Barajas stated that the AskPasco App presentation was moved forward to a future Council Workshop due to the late hour. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION Mr. Campos commented on the arts and culture in the Downtown area to allow murals within the downtown area and debrief of Cinco de Mayo event. Ms. Torres commented on Cinco de Mayo event. EXECUTIVE SESSION Council adjourned into Executive Session at 9:57 PM for 10 minutes to discuss with legal counsel about current or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) with the Acting City Manager and the City Attorney. Mayor Barajas called the meeting back to order at 10:07 PM. Page 2 of3Page20of318 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:07 PM. PASSED and APPROVED this __ day of ________________, 20__. APPROVED: ATTEST: Blanche Barajas, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk Page 3 of3Page21of318 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 2, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Richa Sigdel, Finance Director Finance SUBJECT: Bills and Communications I. REFERENCE(S): Accounts Payable 06.06.22 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve claims in the total amount of $4,572,929.93 ($2,832,909.72 in Check Nos. 248486-248853; $785,846.15 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 835565-835600, 835648-835683, 835689-835757, 835759-835830, 835838-835973, 835979- 835982; $10,552.74 in Check Nos. 53909-53918; $943,621.32 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30175277-30175837). III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 22 of 318 REPORTING PERIOD: June 6, 2022 Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'l Bank Electronic Bank Combined Check Numbers 248486-248853 53909-53918 Total Check Amount $2,832,909.72 $10,552.74 Total Checks 2,843,462.46$ Electronic Transfer Numbers 835565-835600 30175277-30175837 835648-835683 835689-835757 835759-835830 835838-835973 835979-835982 Total EFT Amount $785,846.15 $943,621.32 $0.00 Total EFTs 1,729,467.47$ Grand Total 4,572,929.93$ Councilmember 829,358.88 206,845.57 35,757.20 10,384.30 1,715.32 50,372.98 161.17 790.58 1,359.81 2,535.34 139.37 29,043.16 434.42 14,837.96 73,241.33 HOTEL/MOTEL EXCISE TAX 12,872.99 737,802.21 1,011,162.59 47,248.10 3,849.83 64.00 478,834.00 5,742.71 1,018,376.11 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS:4,572,929.93$ PAYROLL CLEARING EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING BUSINESS EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE FLEX EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LODGING LITTER ABATEMENT REVOLVING ABATEMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION UTILITY, WATER/SEWER C.D. BLOCK GRANT HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER AMBULANCE SERVICE CEMETERY ATHLETIC PROGRAMS SENIOR CENTER OPERATING MULTI-MODAL FACILITY City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such claim. Dave Zabell, City Manager Darcy Buckley, Finance Manager We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this 6th day of June, 2022 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment: Councilmember SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND: GENERAL FUND STREET The City Council May 12 - June 1, 2022 C I T Y O F P A S C O Council Meeting of: Accounts Payable Approved Page 23 of 318 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 25, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Dave Zabell, City Manager Executive SUBJECT: HAPO Center Energy Improvements Discussion I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: To be determined. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City of Pasco entered into an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with Franklin County in May 1994 providing for the joint development of the TRAC Facility, currently known as the "HAPO Center," and includes the financing, acquisition and ownership of its multipurpose arena and exhibition facility. Said agreement expires in 2024. In December 2014, Addendum No. 1 to the ILA was executed amending "Section 8.4, Payment of Operating Costs" wherein both parties (Franklin County and City of Pasco) agreed to each pay 50% of any operating costs that exceed revenues from operation of the TRAC Facility in any calendar year. A Cash Flow Reserve Fund was also created and each party deposited $100,000 into the fund be January 1, 2015. and may be used to draw from for operating cost shortfalls and likewise deposits would be deposited in the event revenues exceeded the TRAC's operating costs. Franklin County recently conducted an energy audit of the facility, which identified several million dollars in needed HVAC rehabilitation and other improvements to the facility, including interior and exterior lighting improvements. The facility is under a deadline for compliance with state energy code requirements and will be subject to future fines if compliance is not Page 24 of 318 achieved, so there is a current need to begin planning and executing on needed improvement. The existence of the facility has and continues to support private commercial businesses in the area; three hotels, retail, restaurants, and grocery. While Franklin County owns the facility, the HAPO Center (TRAC) has been a decades long partnership between the City and County. The County wishes to explore the City's ability and willingness to further partner on needed improvements to the facility to assure its usefulness and competitiveness into the future. V. DISCUSSION: Keith Johnson, Franklin County Administrator, will update the Council on needed improvements to the HAPO Center. Page 25 of 318 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 2, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance - Lamb 5 LLC Annexation (ANX 2021-007) I. REFERENCE(S): Ordinance Overview Map Vicinity Map Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Assessor's Certification II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. ______, relating to annexation and annexing certain real property to the City of Pasco, and further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: The addition of $29,853,300.00 to the assessed value of the City and the commensurate responsibility of providing government services to development. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On September 27, 2021, the owners of property located at the northwest corner of West Court Street and Road 68 (Franklin County Assessor’s Parcels No. 118501041 and No. 118501050), submitted a Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation. The Notice of Intent was reviewed by staff and was determined to contain sufficient signatures to initiate the annexation process. Notices of Intent are Page 26 of 318 required to contain the signatures of property owners representing at least 10 percent of the assessed value of an area proposed for annexation. In this case, the Notice of Intent contained the signatures of owners representing 100 percent of the assessed value of the two initial parcels proposed for annexation (Parcel Nos. 118501041 and 118501050). On October 25, 2021, Council held a workshop to discuss the Lamb 5 LLC annexation and that that there may be additional property adjacent to this property, which may be included in this annexation. On January 18, 2022, Council approved Resolution No. 4140 accepting the Notice of Intent to commence annexation and accepting an additional and expanded annexation area. On April 15, 2022, the City received a petition containing the signatures of property owners representing at least sixty (60) percent of the assessed value of an area proposed for annexation. The County Assessor has certified that the petition, along with Annexation Agreements for the area, contained the signatures of property owners representing at least sixty (60) percent of the assessed value of the proposed annexation area. V. DISCUSSION: The proposed annexation will cause the area in question to be annexed to the City subject to the following conditions: 1. The Pasco Comprehensive Plan will be applicable to the area. 2. The annexation area will assume proportionate and existing bonded indebtedness. 3. The annexation area will be assigned to City Council District No. 5. The Hearing Examiner conducted a zoning determination hearing for the proposed annexation area on May 11, 2022. Following the hearing the Hearing Examiner made a recommendation to Council to approve C-1 (Retail Business), RS-20 (Suburban), R-1 (Low-Density Residential), R-2 (Medium-Density Residential), and R-3 (Medium-Density Residential) zoning, as depicted on the proposed zoning map (“Exhibit A”) attached to the May 11, 2022, Hearing Examiner report for the annexation area, in alignment with the City's recently adopted Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The zoning determination ordinance will be considered in conjunction with this annexation proposal. The annexation will result in much needed commercial and residential development opportunities for the citizens of Pasco. Page 27 of 318 Ordinance – Lamb 5 LLC Annexation (ANX 2021-007) - 1 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: City of Pasco, Washington WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Pasco, Washington Attn: City Clerk 525 North 3rd Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ANNEXATION AND ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF PASCO. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco received a petition application completed by Lamb 5 LLC, owners of no less than ten (10) percent of certain property on January 3, 2022, meeting the requirements of RCW 35A.14.120; and WHEREAS, a meeting with the initiating parties on the proposed annexation application was held on January 18, 2022, wherein City Council passed Resolution No. 4140, accepting the intent to annex, determining the property will be required to assume all proportionate bonded indebtedness, determining that simultaneous zoning will not be required, and determining the property to be annexed as set forth in Section 1 below (Property); and WHEREAS, the City received a petition signed by not less than sixty (60) percent owners of the Property; and WHEREAS, the petition meets the requirements of RCW 35A.01.040 and was certified to be sufficient by the Franklin County Assessor on April 18, 2022; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing on the proposed annexation has been published and posted as required by law; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the proposed annexation was held on June 6, 2022; and WHEREAS, the proposal is consistent with the Franklin County Comprehensive Plan, and annexation of the property is found to be in the public interest. Page 28 of 318 Ordinance – Lamb 5 LLC Annexation (ANX 2021-007) - 2 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following described area, situated in Franklin County, Washington to- wit: That portion of the Southeast Quarter of Section 21 and the Southwest Quarter of Section 22, all in Township 9 North, Range 29 East, WM. described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the North right-of-way line of Court Street and the Future East right-of-way line of Road 72. Thence North along said East right-of-way line of Road 72 and the existing city limits line as described in Auditor’s File Number 161198, Records of Franklin County Washington, to the North line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Southeast Quarter; thence East along said North line to the Northwest Corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Northeast Quarter of said Southeast Quarter; thence South 01°29’03” West a distance of 5.50 feet; thence North 89°40’26” East a distance of 155.42 feet; thence South 89°11’44” East a distance of 74.65 feet; thence South 89°26’07” East a distance of 404.68 feet; thence North 01°29’19” East a distance of 3.42 feet to the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the said Southeast Quarter; thence East to the East right-of-way line of Road 68; thence South along the East right-of- way line of Road 68 to the intersection with Westerly projection of the South line of Buttercreek Estates Phase 2; thence Easterly along said Westerly projection and along the South line of Buttercreek Estates Phase 2 to the East line of Buttercreek Estates Phase 2; thence South 15 feet to a point 15 feet South of the North line of the Southwest Quarter of said Southwest Quarter of Section 22; thence Easterly parallel to said North line to the intersection with the East right-of-way line of Road 64; thence South along the East right-of-way line of Road 64 to the North right-of- way line of Court Street; thence West along the North right-of-way line of Court Street to the Point of Beginning. Situate in Franklin County, State of Washington, comprising approximately 90.21 acres. Together with and subject to Easements, Reservations, Covenants, and Restrictions, of record and in View, as depicted in the map attached hereto and labeled Exhibit A and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Pasco, Washington and is hereby declared to be within the corporate limits of the City of Pasco. Section 2. That the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Pasco be and the same is hereby adopted for the above-described tract of land. Page 29 of 318 Ordinance – Lamb 5 LLC Annexation (ANX 2021-007) - 3 Section 3. That said tract of land shall be required to assume all proportionate and existing bonded indebtedness of the City of Pasco. Section 4. That said tract of land shall be in Voting District No. 5. Section 5. That a certified copy of this Ordinance be and the same shall be filed with the Franklin County Commissioners. Section 6. If any portion of this Ordinance is declared invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion(s) of the Ordinance. Section 7. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this ___ day of 2022. Blanche Barajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorneys Published: _________________________ Page 30 of 318 IVYLnROAD 64ROAD 67ROAD 68PEARL CtRS. Ct MARK ETCt IVYLnROSCRK. CtAPLDRN. Ct DAHLIA C t WILDF LOWR. COLUMBIARIVERCOLUMBIARIVERROAD 68ROAD 68ARGENTROAD 60SYLVESTERLAMBCOURTROAD ROAD 64ROAD 67ROAD 68PEARL CtR. CtWILDF LOWR. CtMARK ETCt IVYLnIVYLnROSCRK. CtAPLDRN. Ct DAHLIA CtHEATHERLnROAD 72TULIP PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF PASCO TO: The City Council ofthe City ofPasco525NorthThirdAvenuePasco, Washington 99301Theundersigned, being the owners of not less than sixtypercent ( 60% ), in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of the real property described inExhibit "A" attachedhereto, lying contiguous to the City of Pasco, Washington, do herebypetitionthatsuchterritorybeannexedtoandmadeapartoftheCityofPascoundertheprovisionsofRCW35.14.120, et seq., and any amendments thereto, of the State ofWashington. The territoryproposed to be annexed is within FranklinCounty, Washington, and isdescribedinExhibit "A," attached hereto. WHEREFORE, the undersigned respectively petition the Honorable City Council andask: (a)That appropriate action be takento entertain this petition, fixinga date forapublichearing, causing notice to be published andposted, specifyingthe time and place ofsuchhearing, and inviting all persons interested to appear and voice approval or disapprovalofsuchannexation; and, (b)That followingsuch hearing the City Council determine by Ordinancethatsuchannexationshallbeeffective; and that propertyso annexed shall become a part of theCityofPasco, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafterenforced. The Petitioners subscribing hereto agree that all property within the territoryherebysoughttobeannexedshallberequiredtoassumeanyproportionalexistingindebtednessandwillnotrequiresimultaneousadoptionofzoningregulationsinaccordancewiththeCityCouncil's acceptance of the Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation as indicated inResolutionNo. 4134 as recorded in the January 3, 2022 Council minutes of theCity ofPasco, Washington. This Petition is accompaniedby and has attachedhereto as Exhibit "B" a diagramwhichoutlinestheboundariesofthepropertysoughttobeannexed. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with anyother than his/her name, or whoknowinglysignsmorethanoneofthesepetitions, or signs a petition seeking an electionwhenhe/she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he/she is otherwise not qualifiedtosign, or who makes herein any falsestatement, shall be guilty ofa misdemeanor. 1 Page 34 of 318 Exhibit "A" Legal Description ANX 2021-007 -Lamb 5 LLC Annexation THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21 AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W.M. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET AND THE FUTURE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD 72. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD 72 AND THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS LINE AS DESCRIBED IN AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 161198, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY WASHINGTON, TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 01 °29'03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°40'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 155.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°11 44" EAST A DISTANCE OF 74.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°26'07" EAST A DISTANCE OF 404.68 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 °29'19 EAST A DISTANCE OF 3.42 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD 68; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD 68 TO THE INTERSECTION WITH WESTERLY PROJECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF BUTTERCREEK ESTATES PHASE 2; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY PROJECTION AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF BUTTERCREEK ESTATES PHASE 2 TO THE EAST LINE OF BUTTERCREEK ESTATES PHASE 2; THENCE SOUTH 15 FEET TO A POINT 15 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL TO SAID NORTH LINE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD 64; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD 64 TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING Page 35 of 318 Item: Lamb 5 LLC Annexation Exhibit B" Applicants: Lamb 5 LLC c/o Ann Rouse File #: ANX 2021-007 I ZD 2021-007 I / I' •· ----- fERRY..Gt-----"-'"-.. ;I .,.,,.,...,\ i __ J = \ ___ ,_ c_,r..,..,,."' -f -·,-T-___ t-,_ "'-.. "'-.. ' ~i ;------ L_ _, l._ W+E 1 1 t ----'- 1 1 ,--, •--h o 0--. "'"'"'"' '\Si t ··•:t-,-"•'":. ....I ,___ ' T --c:--. = _>>>>>> 1-,"· i t · __ __ r ,____ _ I , ---_-, -' ))>, I ,. I , .._, ·• '• I '··· • - I r·· J-) )0 ) a!: • I -----. » H » » Gi ___ ,,<,,,,,,.,4, r --r _ --_---r r< .·--w st'-_ _, _---_ - I r-_i_·-=------,-'"' __ ·-"YiCO.'URT St ) ) ) )!) )I) 0 'r: , ,-·,z' .. -.s··c I I ' -·-, . • ) ) ) > ll' r';?,; 1 --""·_g. . .i. "'---fB , , .. t ) E , : 1 uw 21 · J .----IV:Y=Lrf:C, $-_ r r--l _k..l _______ ,i_ _ i 0 430 ff! J...,L. , gJ" , jt ! I I-: L---J ·::8 I r l ·-----,-1 r ,• IN I 850 . . ' ' l -Ill . --···'·-·- II 1 ' ;;: 1 1.-i::-... -·ioo 1,10 J::' Feet I J I I ; 'o·· fY1ERCEpEs:st ,__ --; ! \ Ir a -orI 1------,,....----l !! ;. . I• -.-... -•""-:"''""'--.- ... ...,.._> i !l I L -.J...,-- 2 Page 37 of 318 Affidavit of Signature for Annexation Notice of Intent and Petition Under the penalty of perjury, I declare under oath, that I am authorized to sign deedsandencumbrancesonbehalfofLamb 5 LLC, and I am furtherauthorized to sign otherdocumentsincludingNoticesofIntentandPetitions.State ofWashingtonCountyoft)'u\Nt.UII\) ): ss.) I certifythat I know or have satisfactoryevidence that J.1'Ml:"S l). L\'Ao isthepersonwhoappearedbeforeme, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signedthisinstrument, on oath stated that (he/she) was authorized to execute the instrumentandacknowledgeditastheiv\trl'lAtu::. of l..AM& c;; , LLCtobethefreeandvoluntaryactofsuchpartyfortheusesandpurposesmentionedintheinstrument.Given under my hand and official seal is S1\-I day of{ l,\L , ?JYL,,"L. and forthe StateofWashingtonResidingat:My Commission Expires:'1 & is Page 38 of 318 FRANKLIN COUNTYASSESSOR JOHN A. ROSENAU -ASSESSOR FENN/£ Ho-CHIEF DEPUTY NIKKI MORGAN -CHIEFAPPRAISER April 18, 2022 VALIDATION OF ANNEXATION PETITION I, John A Rosenau, Franklin County Assessor, do hereby certifythat the petition forannexation provided bytheCityofPascofortheunincorporatedlandsANX2021-007 known as the Lamb5 LLC AnnexationlocatedanddescribedinExhibit "A & B" is sufficientas far as the percentage ofvaluation required fortheannexation. The specificvalidation is as follows: VALUE SIGNATURES $29,853,300.00 $21,604, I00.00JohnARosenauFRANKLINCOUNTYASSESSOR PERCENTAGE 72.37% Franklin County Assessor 1016 N 4'' AveA104 Pasco, WA 99301 Phone: 509-545-3506 Fax: 509-546-5840 Em2il: jrosenau@franklincountywa.govPage39of318 TotalMarketVal TotalAssessedV.f"riorMarket : Owner Signed0FirstName -----'"·---- 118471020 P&R CONSTRUCTION LLC $890,100.00 $890,100.00 $890,100.00 118472083 ANDRE TYLER & DANIELLE $561,200.00 $561,200.00 $561,200.00 118472093 FINNELLY DANIEL T & JEANNINE L $645,300.00 $645,300.00 $645,300.00 118472094 ANDRE TYLER & DANIELLE $642,200.00 $642,200.00 $642,200.00 118472095 VARGAS ALBERT & ANDREA M $523,600.00 $523,600.00 $523,600.00 118472096 CORRIGAN SCOTT R & RACHEL A $551,200.00 $551,200.00 $551,200.00 118472097 HERNANDEZ DUSTIN S & LAURA V $620,200.00 $620,200.00 $620,200.00 118501014 SMITH CHRISTOPHER J & KAYLEE $373,400.00 $373,400.00 $373,400.00 118501016 GUTMANN DALE T $499,100.00 $499,100.00 $499,100.00 118501017 GONZALEZ (ETUX) MIZAEL ACEVEDO $139,200.00 $139,200.00 $139,200.00 118501018 SUAREZ ELI ISAIAH & JASMINE $139,500.00 $139,500.00 $139,500.00 118501019 MOYERS BENJAMIN $543,800.00 $543,800.00 $543,800.00 118501020 GARZA MARCOS & ABBEY $541,000.00 $541,000.00 $541,000.00 118501021 ARONSON MICHAEL C & LORI K $563,400.00 $563,400.00 $563,400.00 118501022 FLORES (JR) BENITO M & LISA $524,700.00 $524,700.00 $524,700.00 118501023 FITZGERALD ZECHARIAH & KAYLA $594,400.00 $594,400.00 $594,400.00 118501024 PEREZ JOHN &ADINA $511,300.00 $511,300.00 $511,300.00 118501025 MILLENNIAL HOMES, LLC $138,600.00 $138,600.00 $138,600.00 118501026 LAVRENTIEV ANDREW $141,300.00 $141,300.00 $141,300.00 118501027 HEYEN LARRY & LORI $495,800.00 $495,800.00 $495,800.00 118501028 ANDROS LAWRENCE & VANESSA $573,700.00 $573,700.00 $573,700.00 118501041 LAMB 5 LLC $377,900.00 $377,900.00 $377,900.00 118501050 LAMB 5 LLC $402,400.00 $402,400.00 $402,400.00 118502022 ROSS BILLIE J $821,300.00 $354,500.00 $821,300.00 118502031 ARTHUR MICHELLE (ET VIR) $450,000.00 $450,000.00 $450,000.00 118502040 ROSS BILLIE J $242,500.00 $242,500.00 $242,500.00 118502059 HERNANDEZ FERNANDO G $628,700.00 $628,700.00 $628,700.00 118502068 GATEWOOD GARY & JULIA $566,600.00 $566,600.00 $566,600.00 118601006 BAKER BRANDON M & CARLA M $523,100.00 $523,100.00 $523,100.00 118601007 HOLLOWAY SHERMAN E & FALLON G $509,000.00 $509,000.00 $509,000.00 118601008 MITCHELL (Ill) RONALD E & BRADY L $501,700.00 $501,700.00 $501,700.00 118601009 GARCIA ROGELIO & CHRISTINE 118601010 HENDRICKSON (JR) ROBERT M & CARRIE A 118601011 GILES DAMMON E & NICOLE A 118601012 EUBANKS STANLEY V & NATALIE K 118601013 HARRISON JULIE 118601022 LEIGHTY BRENDA K 118601031 RAMIREZ-MANRIQUEZ MARGARITO (ETUX) 118601051 BOSSERT (ETUX) JOHN M 118601052 LONGMIRE (ETUX) DANIEL G 118601053 ANDRING JACOB J & ALISHA E 118601054 GRAVELLE SHARLA L & PAUL C (JR) 118601055 MEREDITH (ETUX) CHRISTOPHER 118601056 LARA ISAAC R & JENI 118601057 PERKINS DAVID & JENNIFER 118601058 MCCONATHY CRAIG D & BRANDY 118601059 CRUZ HECTOR D & BRENDA E 118601060 SISEMORE MATT 118601061 GARCIA (ETAL) JESSICA 118601062 SALL BARBARA J 118601063 FRANKENFIELD SCOTT A & MINDY K 118601064 HAYDEN RANDY & ERNA ANETTE 118601065 PALOMINO IVAN & LILIANA R 118601066 KIRK HEATHER I 118602013 WOODS MICHAEL & TRACY 118602014 WOODS MICHAEL & TRACY 118602021 DIN SHYAN MOSLEY 118602030 CASTANEDA ISAIAS 118602049 MOORE'S REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LLC 118602058 HERRES KENNETH & FLORIS 118602067 SOLBRACK (ETAL) THOMAS C 414,400.00 $414,400.00 524,200.00 $524,200.00 532,600.00 $532,600.00 529,800.00 $529,800.00 167,300.00 $167,300.00 302,800.00 $302,800.00 277,600.00 $277,600.00 514,000.00 $514,000.00 478,100.00 $478,100.00 527,400.00 $527,400.00 644,300.00 $644,300.00 426,300.00 $426,300.00 380,000.00 $380,000.00 536,600.00 $536,600.00 558,700.00 $558,700.00 460,800.00 $460,800.00 529,700.00 $529,700.00 484,700.00 $484,700.00 517,000.00 $517,000.00 583,400.00 $583,400.00 560,000.00 $560,000.00 465,500.00 $465,500.00 501,500.00 $501,500.00 161,400.00 $161,400.00 588,400.00 $588,400.00 481,600.00 $481,600.00 314,200.00 $314,200.00 1,003,500.00 $1,003,500.00 304,500.00 $304,500.00 846,800.00 $846,800.00 29,853,300.00 414,400.00 524,200.00 532,600.00 529,800.00 167,300.00 302,800.00 277,600.00 514,000.00 478,100.00 527,400.00 644,300.00 426,300.00 380,000.00 536,600.00 558,700.00 460,800.00 529,700.00 484,700.00 517,000.00 583,400.00 560,000.00 465,500.00 501,500.00 161,400.00 588,400.00 481,600.00 314,200.00 1,003,500.00 304,500.00 846,800.00 414,400.00 524,200.00 532,600.00 529,800.00 167,300.00 514,000.00 527,400.00 644,300.00 426,300.00 380,000.00 536,600.00 558,700.00 460,800.00 529,700.00 484,700.00 517,000.00 583,400.00 560,000.00 465,500.00 161,400.00 1,003,500.00 29,853,300.00 $21,604,100.00 72.37% PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF PASCO TO: The City Council ofthe City ofPasco 525 North Third Avenue Pasco, Washington 9930I The undersigned, being the owners of not less than sixty percent (60%), in value, according to the assessed valuation forgeneral taxation, of the real property described in Exhibit "A" attachedhereto, lying contiguous to the City of Pasco, Washington, do hereby petition that such territory be annexed toand made a part of the City of Pasco under the provisions of RCW 35.14.120, et seq., and any amendments thereto, of the State of Washington. The territoryproposed to be annexed is within Franklin County, Washington, and is described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto. WHEREFORE, the undersigned respectivelypetition the Honorable City Council and ask: a)That appropriate action be taken to entertain this petition, fixinga date forapublichearing, causing notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons interested to appear and voice approval or disapproval ofsuch annexation; and, b)That following such hearing the City Council determine by Ordinancethatsuchannexationshallbeeffective; and that property so annexed shall become a part of the City ofPasco, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafterenforced. ThePetitioners subscribing hereto agree that all property withinthe territoryhereby sought to beannexed shall be required to assume any proportional existing indebtedness and will not require simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations in accordance with the City Council's acceptance of the Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation as indicated in Resolution No. 4134 as recorded in the January 32 2022 Council minutes of the City of Pasco, Washington. This Petition is accompanied by and has attached hereto as Exhibit "B" a diagram which outlines the boundaries ofthe property sought to beannexed. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other thanhis/her name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he/she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he/she is otherwise not qualifiedto sign, or who makes herein any falsestatement, shall be guiltyofa misdemeanor. 1 Page 42 of 318 Exhibit "A" ANX 2021-007 -Lamb 5 LLC Annexation THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21 AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W.M. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET AND THE FUTURE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD 72. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD 72 AND THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS LINE AS DESCRIBED IN AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 161198, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY WASHINGTON, TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 01 °29'03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°40'26" EAST DISTANCE OF 155.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °11'44" EAST A DISTANCE OF 74.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°26'0r EAST ADISTANCE OF404.68 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 °29'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF 3.42 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD 68; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD 68 TO THE INTERSECTION WITH WESTERLY PROJECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF BUffiRCREEK ESTATES PHASE 2; THENCE EASTERLY ALONGSAIDWESTERLY PROJECTION ANDALONGTHESOUTH LINEOF BUTTERCREEK ESTATES PHASE 2 TO THE EAST LINE OF BUffiRCREEKESTATES PHASE 2; THENCE SOUTH 15 FEET TO A POINT 15 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL TO SAID NORTH LINE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST RIGHT OF WAYLINE OF ROAD 64; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD 64 TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING Page 43 of 318 Item: Lamb 5 LLC Annexation " Exhibit B" Applicants: Lamb 5 LLC c/o Ann Rouse File #: ANX 2021-007 / ZD 2021-007 I r---------.-----,------,-----w_wE NETTJ(d " \ O" QUEEN-BEE "ttl-. . -I - I l i' f ' ,J c'°"...,....,,,._.,.. ;; ER RY. 0:----·---·l ! -...,•\ lJ ---· I 1 'd--.<e-- BITTtERNt CirT - -, • ' ISJLVRCB.ST.1a Pasco ROS-CB,. Ct l 1----·- I ! I j N W+E s m Lamb 5 LLC Annexation Area Pasco CityLimits I , I IMP..VERICK.Ct · · 1... • - t:J 3:.-<t• I BB.TH, .Dr...,;;c-- p Ir ---·--- W P.EARLSt .. a::--.... ' d·Z ·N -r---, I ID, ' W-rE:·s( I ™:h¢ '-...",p>>> )±) >). > >D \D} > > > > r, '> i..---- ·--- - • . __ W COURT St __ ... -·· -,.... ... •71-i -,y-·y---l 5-·-r·I, . -1 f'--:-· ·-- ' 1• ,c.; : ' • • t ,._. '. i . i • ! I ,J: -.;-.. ,(.--.,- •,,_:,. .• } 1····-,(:J('--ffi.- ··-· ·•--, E ' t ' i 1-: ;.,, 1 1 •. ::s r ,, ... ----i . r .. 15.s.S .. ct f1 1.0 .. ..::-• i t: · ./ r,· .""2:L ......... : ! J ' "° -?Q .. ,_:., ... -·, '-o i er _._ ; --···· .. ··----.. -_JGl. \h.) •- " · · · ~·O ·" L ,....,-('. \ ?1·,----.-IVY-tn _ _,. -,/# ?:. • ,..J ' 21104430>-=850 9i 1,300' 1,70.JI8IIII Feet iN ; ' c::i' -;<e· JY1ERCEp Es_ct .. ,, i·---·r_1 __ 1,-·-i I t l t . =·-·-_ L. 4. 2 Page 45 of 318 AffidavitofSignature for Annexation Notice ofIntent and Petition Under the penalty of perjury, I declare under oath, that I am authorized to sign deeds and encumbrances on behalf of Lamb 5 LLC, and I am further authorized to sign other documents including Notices oflntent and Petitions. Signatu State ofWashington ) County of 11.A ,.;t-u ss. i-·J Date I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that )l-.M1;S V. L\i-\c is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that (he/she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the 1\AANA"-c.""'tL of LAM <;" LLC to be the freeand voluntary act ofsuch partyforthe uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ROB I £LLSWORTH Notary Public State of Washln1ton Commission# 167537 My Comm. Expires Sep 6, 2025 Given under my handand official seal this S1\-I day of flL\ L , 2,0'2,,1,_ _ C in and forthe State of Washington Residing at: My Commission Expires: v) le-LS Page 46 of 318 Page 47 of 318 II H 1111 1111 I 111 111 ;,to PASCO crrv OF POA 33.00 Franklin Co, WA THIS SPECIAL LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY is given and thesignaturesareaffixedheretoasthefreeandvoluntaryactanddeedoftheundersigned. This Special Limited Power ofAttorneyshall not be affectedby the disability of any oftheprincipals. THIS COVENANT is intended to and shall run with all or any portion of therealpropertydescribedbelowandshallbindallheirs, assigns, transferees, andsubsequentsuccessorsininterests. The property is located at 1805 ROAD 72, Pasco, Washington, and morelegallydescribedasfollows: SHORT PLAT 78-3 LOT 1 PARCEL NO. 118-502-059 DATED this . i..L_ day of _.__ ..... •--· ___ , .,_ t.:. OWNERS: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ): ss. COUNTY OF FRANKLIN ) On this day personally appeared before me Nava, Everado, to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free andvoluntary act and deed, forthe uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and officialseal this /{p day of / JtClu))62>1-. --• (j _ Crn;r-Jcd{---'--'-&0_m_ev ___ _ NOTAR PUBLIC in and for theState of Washington Residing at W Richland My Commission Expires: August 25, 2007 Power of Attorney forCo,•enant on Utility Sen·ices Owner Approval for Annexation) - 2 Page 48 of 318 Page 49 of 318 Page 50 of 318 Page 51 of 318 Page 52 of 318 Page 53 of 318 Page 54 of 318 Page 55 of 318 Page 56 of 318 Page 57 of 318 Page 58 of 318 Page 59 of 318 Page 60 of 318 Page 61 of 318 Page 62 of 318 Page 63 of 318 Page 64 of 318 Page 65 of 318 Page 66 of 318 Page 67 of 318 Page 68 of 318 Page 69 of 318 Page 70 of 318 Page 71 of 318 Page 72 of 318 Page 73 of 318 Page 74 of 318 Page 75 of 318 Page 76 of 318 Page 77 of 318 Page 78 of 318 Page 79 of 318 Page 80 of 318 Page 81 of 318 Page 82 of 318 Page 83 of 318 Page 84 of 318 Page 85 of 318 Page 86 of 318 Page 87 of 318 Page 88 of 318 Page 89 of 318 Page 90 of 318 Page 91 of 318 Page 92 of 318 Page 93 of 318 Page 94 of 318 Page 95 of 318 Page 96 of 318 Page 97 of 318 Page 98 of 318 Page 99 of 318 Page 100 of 318 Page 101 of 318 Page 102 of 318 Page 103 of 318 Page 104 of 318 Page 105 of 318 Page 106 of 318 Page 107 of 318 Page 108 of 318 Page 109 of 318 Page 110 of 318 Page 111 of 318 Page 112 of 318 Page 113 of 318 Page 114 of 318 Page 115 of 318 Page 116 of 318 Page 117 of 318 Page 118 of 318 Page 119 of 318 Page 120 of 318 Page 121 of 318 Page 122 of 318 Page 123 of 318 Page 124 of 318 Page 125 of 318 Page 126 of 318 Page 127 of 318 Page 128 of 318 Page 129 of 318 Page 130 of 318 Page 131 of 318 Page 132 of 318 Page 133 of 318 Page 134 of 318 Page 135 of 318 Page 136 of 318 Page 137 of 318 Page 138 of 318 Page 139 of 318 Page 140 of 318 Page 141 of 318 Page 142 of 318 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 2, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Barker Ranch Right-of-Way (ROW) Vacation (VAC 2022- 002) I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Short Plat 2020-22 Vacation Petition II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING MOTION: I move to deny the request for the vacation of a 10-foot right-of-way for Burns Road established per Short Plat 2020-22. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The adjacent property owners have petitioned for the vacation of a 10-foot right- of-way for Burns Road established per Short Plat 2020-22. The 10-foot right-of-way in question was dedicated in 2020 as part of Short Plat 2020-22. The City did not pay for dedication of the right-of-way. V. DISCUSSION: According to the approved City of Pasco 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan), recently updated through Ordinance No. 4537, Burns Road is classified Page 143 of 318 as a "Principal Arterial" street. Principal Arterial streets are defined in the Comp Plan as, "Intercommunity and intra-metro area streets that are primarily used for traffic movement. Their general characteristics include moderate to high speeds that are generally 35 mph to 55 mph, high traffic generators, and no on -street parking." According to Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Section 21.15.040(1), Arterial Street Right-of-Way (ROW) Widths may be between 80 and 100 feet wide, depending on the landscaping treatment. The current ROW width along the Burns Road frontage of the Barker Ranch subdivision is 90 feet. At present there has been significant unmitigated single family development in the unincorporated county to the north of the city limits which has put a burden on Burns Road. Further, Burns Road is projected to be the epicenter of new development in the City of Pasco for the next 10 to 15 years, including considerable residential development along the corridor itself. In conjunction with recent (unincorporated county) and projected private residential development, the Broadmoor area is expected to see significant commercial development with major retail shopping, entertainment, and hospitality opportunities; while development within the City will be mitigated, they will contribute to traffic volume increases on Burns Road and on the traffic distribution network in the Broadmoor area. In fact, the City intends to implement a Tax Increment Financing Program for theininfrastructureutilityand $40M newofapproximately roadway immediate area Broadmoor area. Given the above impact and point at which the City is in the process of planning and design, it is early in that process to determine the ultimate width needed along Burns Road in the area of the street vacation request. Accordingly, staff recommends Council denial of the ROW vacation request. It may be appropriate for reconsideration at a later date when more information is known. If Council ultimately prefers to vacate the ROW, staff can prepare an Ordinance for consideration. Page 144 of 318 633883438686476406633883438 686476406COLUMBIARIVERCOLUMBIARIVERCOLUMBIARIVERCOLUMBIARIVERBROADMOORBlvdDENTRdCHAPELHILL BlvdSANDIFUR PkwyDENT RdHARRIS RdBURNS 127110 BURNS RDBenton County WA, dTil Cityof II• Pasco Community & Economic Development Department PO Box 293, 525 N 3rd Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 P: 509.545.3441 / F: 509.545.3499 CITY OF PASCO STREET/ ALLEY VACATION PETITION Fee: $300 Master File # Date Submitted: 0311812022------ We the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately-owned abutting property, hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the following described street/alley rights-of-way: A 10 foot right of way for Burns Rd established per shortplat 2020-22 Name: Pro Made Homes Address: 105609 Wiser Parkway, Kennewick WA 99338 Applicant/ Phone: Owner 1 (509) 392-7080 Email: Paul@infinityhomesofwa.com Signature: f Name: Address: Owner 2 Phone: Email: Signature: Please see reverse side) Updated April 2019 Page 152 of 318 Name: Address: Owner 3 Phone: Email: Signature: 0 Survey D Title Report if not waived) D Fee of $300 Page 153 of 318 BURNS ROAD060706PBS EngineeringandEnvironmental Inc. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONPBS EngineeringandEnvironmental Inc. AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 10, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Public Hearing - East Lewis Place ROW Vacation (VAC 2022-003) Continue Hearing to July 5, 2022 I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Vacation Petition II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to open the public hearing for the East Lewis Place Right -of- Way Vacation (VAC 2022-003) and continue it to the July 5, 2022, Council meeting. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On May 6, 2013, Council approved Ordinance No. 4102 vacating 35 feet and 45 feet from the north and south sides, respectively, of East Lewis Place from Heritage Boulevard to U.S. Highway 12. The remaining right-of-way width from this 2013 Ordinance is as follows: 40 feet from the road center line to the north right -of-way line; 30 feet from the road center line to the south Right-of-Way line; a total of 70 feet of right-of-way. At the time the Engineering Division had determined that 70 feet of right -of-way would be the optimal width needed to accommodate future industrial traffic in the area. The adjacent property owners have petitioned for the vacation of a portion of East Lewis Place right-of-way (formerly primary State Highway No. 3, Pasco to Page 156 of 318 Attalia) as established per Washington State Department of Transportation WSDOT). On May 16, 2022, City Council approved Resolution No. 4186, fixing June 6, 2022, as the date for a public hearing to consider the vacation request. V. DISCUSSION: The City Engineer has since determined it appropriate that the right-of-way on the north side of East Lewis Place remain at 40’ consistent with neighboring parcels and in consideration of future road widening. It is further recommended that the petitioner prepare a new survey to reflect that 40’ line parallel to the centerline of East Lewis Place extending until it reaches the right-of-way for U.S. Highway 12. Further, unfortunately public notices for the hearing were not posted per RCW and Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) requirements. In order to meet the 20 -day notification requirement, the public hearing will need to be continued to the July 5, 2022, Council meeting. To rectify this oversight, staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing, not take public testimony but immediately continue the hearing to the July 5, 2022, Council meeting. Page 157 of 318 E HELENA ST ELEWISST EGEORGE ST TIERRAVIDA L N MANZANITALNHERITAGE BLVD N VEN TU R ER D HARVESTCTCANADA CTNAVERYAVEE ALVINA ST E ADELIA STESTRELLADRN PENNIELNSEMILLACT SPRU CE S TLUNA DRWUS 1 2 T OP K R A MP FORTALEZADREU S12TO P K R AMPVENTURE PL S C O MMERCIALAVEU S 1 2 E N C O M M ER C I A L A VE LEWISTO US 12 RAMPEU S 1 2 W E LEWIS PL Lewis Place LLC Benton County WA, Maxar, Microsoft 0 430 8501, 300 1,700210 Feet 0 430 8501, 300 1, 700210 Feet Overview Map SITE Item: ROW Vacation - East Lewis Place Applicant: Steven Bauman c/o Lewis Place LLC File #: U S 1 2 W U S 1 2 E LE W IS T O U S 12 R A M P E E LEWIS PL Lewis Place LLC Benton County WA, Maxar, Microsoft 0 140 280 42056070 Feet 0 140 280 42056070 Feet Vicinity Map SITESITE Item: ROW Vacation - East Lewis Place Applicant: Steven Bauman c/o Lewis Place LLC File #: VAC 2022-003 Fee:$300 Community & Economic Development CITY OF PASCO STREET/ALLEY VACATION PETITION Master File # ------Date Submitted: 04I06l2022 We the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately-owned abutting property, hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the following described street/alley rights-of-way: A portion (0.69 acres) of East Lewis Place Right of Way. Formerly primarily State Highway No. 3, Pasco to Attalia) Name: Lewis Place, LLC Address: 2715 St. Andrews Loop, Suite A, Pasco, WA 99301 Applicant/ Phone: Owner 1 509-845-7199 Email: steve@b4land.com & ann@b4land.com Name: Address: Owner 2 Phone: Email: Signature: Please see reverse side) Updated April 2019 Page 160 of 318 Name: Address: Owner3 Phone: Email: Signature: Survey Title Report if not waived) Fee of $300 Page 161 of 318 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 2, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Q Ordinance - Lamb 5 LLC Zoning Determination of Annexed Property ZD 2021-007) I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Zoning Ordinance Overview Map Hearing Examiner Report II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. _____, assigning zoning to the Lamb 5 LLC annexation area as recommended by the Hearing Examiner, and further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On January 18, 2022, Council approved Resolution No. 4140, accepting a Notice of Intent to commence annexation and determining the disposition on three items listed below. Following the passage of the resolution, a final petition was submitted to the City. On May 11, 2022, the Hearing Examiner held a public hearing to consider C -1 Retail Business), RS-20 (Suburban), R-1 (Low-Density Residential), R-2 Medium-Density Residential), and R-3 (Medium-Density Residential), for the proposed Lamb 5 LLC annexation area, as depicted on the proposed zoning map (“Exhibit A”) attached to the May 11, 2022, Hearing Examiner report, in conjunction with the proposed annexation. Page 162 of 318 Following the conduct of a hearing the Hearing Examiner recommended the City Council approve C-1 (Retail Business), RS-20 (Suburban), R-1 (Low-Density Residential), R-2 (Medium-Density Residential), and R-3 (Medium-Density Residential), for the proposed Lamb 5 LLC annexation area. V. DISCUSSION: The Hearing Examiner conducted a zoning determination hearing for the proposed annexation area on May 11, 2022, and recommended the area be zoned C-1 (Retail Business), RS-20 (Suburban), R-1 (Low-Density Residential), R-2 (Medium-Density Residential), and R-3 (Medium-Density Residential), for the Lamb 5 LLC annexation area, as depicted on the proposed zoning map. The proposed zoning is in alignment with the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the area. As the annexation and zoning determination process will result in additional residential and commercial development and job creation within the existing Pasco Urban Growth Area, staff recommends Council's approval of the annexation. Page 163 of 318 Ordinance- Lamb 5 LLC Annexation ZD 2021-007 - 1 ORDINANCE NO. _________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, ASSIGNING ZONING TO THE LAMB 5 LLC ANNEXATION AREA, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. WHEREAS, on May 11, 2022, pursuant to the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Section 25.220.020, the Hearing Examiner of the City of Pasco conducted a public hearing to develop a recommendation for the assignment of zoning to certain property, as set forth in Section 1 below Property), in the event the property was incorporated within the City; and WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner also recommended approval of the proposed zoning designation after concluding, pursuant to PMC Section 25.210.060, that the proposal: (a) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; (b) is not materially detrimental to the immediate vicinity; (c) has merit and value for the community as a whole; (d) does not require conditions or mitigation measures; and (e) does not require a concomitant agreement; and Council hereby adopts the Hearing Examiner’s findings, conclusions and recommendation as attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2022, Ordinance No. ______, effectively annexed the Property to the City of Pasco. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following described area, situated in Franklin County, Washington to-wit: That portion of the Southeast Quarter of Section 21 and the Southwest Quarter of Section 22, all in Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M. described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the North Right-of-Way line of Court Street and the future East Right-of-Way line of Road 72. Thence North along said East Right-of-Way line of Road 72 and the existing City Limits line as described in Auditor’s File Number 161198, Records of Franklin County Washington, to the North line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Southeast Quarter; thence East along said North line to the Northwest Corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Northeast Quarter of said Southeast Quarter; thence South 01°29’03” West a distance of 5.50 feet; thence North 89°40’26” East a distance of 155.42 feet; thence South 89°11’44” East a distance of 74.65 feet; thence South 89°26’07” East a distance of 404.68 feet; thence North 01°29’19” East a distance of 3.42 feet to the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the said Southeast Quarter; thence Page 164 of 318 Ordinance- Lamb 5 LLC Annexation ZD 2021-007 - 2 East to the East Right-of-Way line of Road 68; thence South along the East Right- of-Way line of Road 68 to the intersection with the Westerly projection of the South line of Buttercreek Estates Phase 2; thence Easterly along said Westerly projection and along the South line of Buttercreek Estates Phase 2 to the East line of Buttercreek Estates Phase 2; thence South 15 feet to a Point 15 feet South of the North line of the Southwest Quarter of said Southwest Quarter of Section 22; thence Easterly parallel to said North line to the intersection with the East Right-of-Way line of Road 64; thence South along the East Right-of-Way line of Road 64 to the North Right-of-Way line of Court Street; thence West along the North Right-of- Way line of Court Street to the Point of Beginning. Situated in Franklin County, State of Washington; comprising approximately 37.03 Acres. Together with and subject to Easements, Reservations, Covenants, and Restrictions, of record and in View, as depicted in the map attached hereto and labeled Exhibit B, be and the same is hereby assigned zoning as follows: 1. C-1 (Retail Business): Parcels 118602021, 118602030, 118602013, 118602058, and the south ½ of Parcels 118602067, 118602049 and 118501041. 2. RS-20 (Suburban): Parcels 118601022, 118601031, 118601052, 118501014, 118501026, 118501024, 118501025, 118501018, 118501017, 118501016, 118501019, 118501020, 118501021, 118501023, 118501027, 118501028, 118601006, 118601007, 118601008, 118601009, 118601010, 118601011, 118601012, 118601013, 118601051, 118601053, 118601054, 118601055, 118601056, 118601057, 118601058, 118601059, 118601060, 118601061, 118601062, 118601063, 118601064, 118601065, 118601066 and 118501022. 3. R-1 (Low-Density Residential): Parcels 118472083, 118502031, 118472097, 118502068, 118502040, 118472093, 118472094, 118472095, 118472096, 118502022, and 118502059. 4. R-2 (Medium-Density Residential): The north ½ of Parcels 118602067 and 118602049. 5. R-3 (Medium-Density Residential): Parcels 118471020, 118602014, 118501050 and the north ½ of Parcel 118501041. Section 2. That any and all zoning maps be and the same are hereby amended to conform to the aforesaid assignment of zoning. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. Page 165 of 318 Ordinance- Lamb 5 LLC Annexation ZD 2021-007 - 3 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this _______ day of 2022. Blanche Barajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorneys Published: ____________________________ Page 166 of 318 R-1 RS-20 R-2 C-1 R-3 R-3 IVYLnROAD 64ROAD 67ROAD 68PEARL CtR. Ct MARKET C t IVY Ln ROSCRK. Ct APLDRN. CtDAHLIACtWIL D F L O W R.C t HEATHERLnROAD 72TULIPCtSILVRCRST. Ct BUTTERNT. Cir ROAD 62TER- RY. Ct 62NDPlJASMN. Ln66TH PlBL.S.C t MARKET D r BRTH. Dr IVYLnPEARL St ZINN. CtMRGL.Loo p AMY L o op MAVERICK Ct LAMB CtMERCEDES Ct W AGATE St W PEARL St QUEENBEECt HILBERTLnPEARL St W WERNETT R d WPEARL St W COURT St SADDLEBRED L o o pPasco 0 430 850 1,300 1,700210 Feet Exhibit A"Item: Lamb 5 LLC Annexation Applicants: Lamb 5 LLC c/ o Ann Rouse File #: ANX 2021- 007 / ZD 2021-007 Proposed Zoning Determination Zone C- Overview Item:Lamb 5 LLC Annexation Applicants:Lamb 5 LLC c/0 Ann Rouse Map -007 /ZD 2021-00 f 'L I’-.I I liq‘..... I 7'; I 0 ERNEIT r~ 5 L.I:M:I1-Ts l ,3 E _.:1Page CITY OF PASCO HEARINGEXAMINER IN THE MATTER OF ZD 2021-007 RECOMMENDED FINDINGSOF FACT, RECOMMENDED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND RECOMMENDATIONLamb5, LLC. THIS MATTER having come on forhearing in frontofthe City of Pasco Hearing Examiner on May 11, 2022, the Hearing Examiner having taken evidence hereby submits the following Recommended Findings of Fact, Recommended Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation as follows: I.RECOMMENDED FINDINGSOF FACT 1.Applicants: RP Development, Inc., 6159 W Deschutes Avenue Suite 509, Kennewick WA 99336 and Lamb 5 LLC, 10220 Maple Drive, Pasco WA 99301. 2.Zoning Determination request: Development ofa zoning recommendation forthe Lamb 5 LLC Annexation ofapproximately 90.21 acres located at the northwest cornerofRoad 68 and West Comt Street. 3.Property/ Application Description: 3 .1 That portion ofthe Southeast Quarter ofSection 21 and the Southwest Quarter ofSection 22, all in Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M. described as foJlows: Beginning at the intersection of the North Right-of-Way lineofCourtStreet and the futureEast Right-of-Way line ofRoad 72. Thence North along said East Right-of-Way line ofRoad 72 and the existing City Limits line as described in Auditor's File Number 161198, Records of Franklin County Washington, to the Northline ofthe Southwest Quarter ofthe Northeast Quarter ofsaid Southeast Quarter; thence East along said Northline to the NorthwestComer ofthe Southeast Quarter ofsaid Northeast Quarterof said Southeast Quarter; thence South 01 °29'03" West a distance of5.50 feet; thence North 89 °40'26" East a distance of155.42 feet; thence South 89°11 '44" East a distance of74.65 feet; thence South 89°26'07" East a distance of404.68 feet; thence North 01 °29'19" East a distance of3.42 feetto the North line ofthe Southeast Quarter ofthe Northeast Quarter of the said Southeast Quarter; thence East to the East Right-of-Way line ofRoad 68; thence South along the East Right-of-Way line ofRoad 68 to the intersection with Westerly projection ofthe South line ofButtercreek Estates Phase 2; thence Easterly along said Westerly projection and along the South line ofButtercreek Estates Phase 2 to the East line ofButtercreek Estates Phase 2; thence South 15 feet to a Point 15 feetSouth ZD 2021 007 Lamb 5 LLC Pagel of6 Page 169 of 318 ofthe North line ofthe Southwest Quarter ofsaid Southwest Quarter ofSection 22; thence Easterly parallel to said North line to the intersection with the East Right-of-Way line ofRoad 64; thence South along the East Right-of-Way line ofRoad 64 to the North Right-of-Way line ofCourt Street; thence West along the North Right-of-Way line ofCourt Street to the Point ofBeginning. 3.2 Parcels 118602067, 118602058, 118602049, 118602030, 118602021, 118602014, 118602013, 118601066, 118601065, 118601064, 118601063, 118601062, 118601061, 118601060, 118601059, 118601058, 118601057, 118601056, 118601055, 118601054, 118601053, 118601052, 118601051, 118601031, 118601022, 118601013, 118601012, 118601011, 118601010, 118601009, 118601008, 118601007, 118601006, 118502068, 118502059, 11850204 118502031, 118502022, 118501050, 118501041, 11850102 11850102 11850102 118501025, 118501024, 118501023, 118501022, 118501021, 11850102 118501019, 11850101 11850]01 11850101 118501014, 118472097, 118472096, 118472095, 118472094, 118472093, 118472083, and 118471020. 3.3 General Location: Located at the northwest corner ofRoad 68 and West Court Street. 3.4 Property Size: Approximately 90.21 acres ofland. 4.Access: The site is accessed from Road 68 and West Court Street. 5.Utilities: Water and sewer service are located in West Court Street. 6.Land Use and Zoning: Applicant's original site is zoned RS-20 (Suburban-County) and contains a single residential unit. 7.Sun-ounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: North: East: South: West: RS-20 (County) C-1 (County) C-1; R-2 RS-20 (County) SFDU/Vacant Agriculture; SFDUs Vacant SFDUs; Agriculture 8.Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Low Density Residential, Medium-Density Residential, and Commercial uses (See Comprehensive Plan Map). 9.Environmental Determination: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. An environmental determination will be made after the public hearing forthis project. A Determination ofNon-Significance or a Mitigated Determination ofNon-Significanceis likely forthis application (WAC 197-11-355). 10.On January 18, 2022, the CityCouncil approved Resolution 4140 accepting a notice of intent to annex approximately 90.21 acres generally located in the area at the northwest cornerofRoad 68 and West Court Street. 11.Following acceptance of the Notice of intent and prior to Council action on an annexation petition, the Hearing Examiner is to hold a zoning determination hearing. The purpose of said hearing is for the Hearing Examiner to recommend appropriate ZD 2021 007 Lamb 5 LLC Page 2 of 6 Page 170 of 318 zoning districts for the proposed annexation area in the event it may become part of the City. 12.In determining the most appropriate zoning for the annexation area, the Hearing Examiner needs to consider the existing land uses, nearby development, zoning, poli.cies of the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Use Designations of the Land Use Map. The Hearing Examiner also needs to be guided by the criteria in PMC 25.210.060 (as discussed below) in developing a zoning recommendation. 13.The purpose of the annexation is to expand primarily residential and commercial opportunities within the City ofPasco's Urban Growth Area (UGA). 14.To maintain consistency with current zoning, land uses, utility planning and the Comprehensive Plan, appropriate zoning should be applied to the proposed annexation area. 15.The initial review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in PMC 25.210.030. The criteria are listed below as follows: 15.1 The date the existing zone became effective: The current zoning was initiated by theCounty (No knowndate). 15 .2 The changed conditions which are alleged to warrant other or additional zoning: 15.2. l The property is located within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. 15.2.2 The property in question is being annexed to the City ofPasco. 15.2.3 Upon annexation the property will need to be zoned. 15 .3 Facts tojustifythe change on the basis of advancing the public health, safety and general welfare: 15.3. l The property is being annexed to the City and will need to be zoned. The justification forthe rezone is the fact that ifa zoning designation is not determined the property could become annexed without zoning. For the advancement of the general welfareof the communitythe property needs to be zoned. 15 .4 The effectit will have on the value and character ofthe adjacent property and the Comprehensive Plan: 15.4.1 Staffhas recommended RS-20 (Suburban) R-1 (Low-Density Residential), R-2 (Medium-Density Residential), R-3 (Medium-DensityResidential), and C-1 (Retail Business) zoning for the annexation area. The Applicants have requested R-3 (Medium-Density Residential) zoning fortheir ownership interest in the area; rezoning the propertyto RS-20, R-1, R-2, R-3 and C-1 will align closely with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designations forthe area. 15 .5 The effecton the property owner or owners if the request is not granted: 15.5.1 Without the annexation area being assigned a specificzoning district, the area will essentially be un-zoned upon annexation. The area needs to be zoned to provide certainty and benefitto the propertyowners, developers, and adjoining property owners. 15.6 The Comprehensive Plan land use designation forthe property: 15.6.1 The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations forthe property include Low Density Residential, Medium-Density Residential, and Commercial uses (See Comprehensive Plan Map). ZD 2021 007 Lamb 5 LLC Page 3 of6 Page 171 of 318 16.The site contains approximately 90.21 acres and is located at the northwest comer of Road 68 and West Court Street. Contiguousproperties to the south and west were annexed in 2002 (Ordinance 3532) and to the east in 2013 (Ordinance 4077). 17.The parcels are all located within the Urban Growth Area (UGA). Parcels in the proposed annexation area are designated by the Comprehensive Plan map forLow DensityResidential, Medium-Density Residential, and Commercial uses (See Comprehensive Plan Map). 18.The Description and Allocation Table ofthe Comprehensive Plan specifiesthe following Purposes, Descriptions, and allowed zoning foreach Land Use Designation: Classification Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Commercial Purpose and Description Singl.e familyresidential development at a density of2 to 5 dwelling units per acre Single-family dwellings, patio homes, townhouses, apartments, and condominiums at a density of 6 to 20 dwelling units per acre Neighborhood, communityand regional shopping and specialty centers, business parks, service and officeuses Zoning* R-S-20; R-S-12; R-S-1; R-1; R-1-A; R-1-A2 R-2 through R-4; RP O; BP; C-1; C-2; C-3; CR 19.The proposed annexation area is within the City's service area as identifiedin the Comprehensive Water and Sewer Plans. 20.Public notice ofthis hearing was posted in the Tri-CityHerald and sent to property owners within 300 feet ofthe propertyon March 24, 2022. 21.City Council approved Resolution 4140 on January 18, 2022, accepting a notice of intent to annex. 22.Tbe site consists ofapproximately90.21 acres. 23.The site is located at the northwest cornerofRoad 68 and West Court Street. 24.The current zoning was initiated by the County (No known date). 25.The property is located within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. 26.Staff has recommended the followingzoning designations fortheannexation area: 26.1 RS-20 (Suburban) 26.2 R-1 (Low-Density Residential) 26.3 R-2 (Medium-Density Residential) 26.4 R-3 (Medium-Density Residential) 26.5 C-1 (Retail Business) ZD 2021 007 Lamb 5 LLC Page 4 of 6 Page 172 of 318 27.Applicants have requested R-3 (Medium-Density Residential) zoning fortheir ownership interest in the area. 28.Rezoning the property to RS-20, R-1, R-2, R-3 and C-1 will align closely with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designations forthe area. 29.The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations forthe propertyinclude Low Density Residential, Medium-Density Residential, and Commercial uses 30.Contiguous properties to the south and west were annexed in 2002. 31.Contiguous properties to the east were annexed in 2013. 32.The parcels are all located within the UGA. 33.An open record public hearing after due legal notice was held May 11, 2022 via videoconference. 34.Appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant was Paul LaVren.tiev. Mr. LaVrentiev testifiedthat he was an agent authorized to appeal and speak on behalf of Lamb 5, LLC. Mr. LaVrentiev indicated that he agreed with all the representations set forth within the staffreport. Their desire was that the north portion of the Lamb 5, LLC propertybe zoned R-3 and the southernportion Commercial. 35.Testifyingfromthe public were the followingpersons: 35.1 Eli Suarez. Mr. Suarez owns propertyon Pearl Street in the RS-20 zone. He has concerns about the densities allowed within the R-3 zone that would create trafficissues on Pearl Street. He requested that the property be zoned RS-20 to be consistent with their zoning. 35.2 Mizael Acededo. Mr. Acededo testifiedthat he agreed with the testimony ofMr. Suarez. He too is concerned with increased trafficon Pearl Street that would result froman R-3 zoning. He asked that the zoning be R-1. 35.3 In response, Mr. LaVrentiev indicated that the R-3 zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation. 36.The staffreport, application materials, agency comments and the entire file of record were admitted into the record. 37.Any Conclusion of Law that is more correctly a Finding of Fact is hereby incorporated as such by this reference. II.RECOMMENDED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Before recommending approval or denial of a rezone, the Hearing Examiner must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25 .210.060. The criteria are as follows: ZD 2021 007 Lamb 5 LLC Page 5 of 6 Page 173 of 318 1.The proposal is in accordance with the goals and policies ofthe Comprehensive Plan. 1.2 Applicants have requested R-3 (Medium-Density Residential) zoning forproperties they control in the annexation area; Staffrecommends C-1 (Retail Business), RS-20 Suburban), R-1 (Low-Density Residential), R-2 (Medium-Density Residential), and R-3 (Medium-Density Residential) zoning for the area; rezoning the property to C- l, RS-20, R-1, R-2, and R-3 will align closely with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designations forthe area. 2.The effectof the proposal on the immediate vicinity will not be materially detrimental. 2.1 Zoning the proposed annexation area C-1 (Retail Business), RS-20 (Suburban), R-1 (Low-Density Residential), R-2 (Medium-Density Residential), and R-3 Medium-Density Residential) will cause the site to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which was approved by CityCouncil. 3.There is merit and value in the proposal forthe community as a whole. 3 .1 There is merit and value in following the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan when assigning zoning to properties within the community. The Plan has indicated this property should be zoned Low Density Residential, Medium- Density Residential, and Commercial (See Comprehensive Plan Map). assigning C-1, RS-20, R-1, R-2, and R-3 zoning will lead to additional housing, convenient shopping, and employment opportunities forPasco residents. 4.Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the proposal. 4.1 The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and no mitigation measures are needed. Applicant shall be required to install improvements and infrastructure per Cityof Pasco requirements. 5.A Concomit ant Agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and if so, the terms and conditions of such an agreement. 5.I A concomitant agreement is not needed. 6.Any Finding of Fact that is more correctly a Conclusion of Law is hereby incorporated as such by this reference. ill. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above Recommended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Hearing Examiner RECOMMENDS to the Pasco City Council to zone Lamb 5 LLC Annexation Area, to the following zoning designations: C-1 (Retail Business), RS-20 (Suburban), R-1 (Low- Density Residential), R-2 (Medium-Density Residential), and R-3 (Medium-Density Residential), as depicted on the proposed zoning map (Exhibit "A") attached to this recommendation. Dated this 16th day of May, 2022. ZD 2021 007 Lamb 5 LLC Page 6 of 6 Page 174 of 318 Item: Lamb 5 LLC Annexation " Exhibit A" Applicants: Lamb 5 LLC c/o Ann Rouse File#: ANX 2021-007 / ZD 2021-007 I I I I--- 1--- I ' I Page 175 of 318 R-1 RS-20 R-2 C-1 R-3 R-3 IVYLnROAD 64ROAD 67ROAD 68PEARL CtR. Ct MARKET C t IVY Ln ROSCRK. Ct APLDRN. CtDAHLIACtWIL D F L O W R.C t HEATHERLnROAD 72TULIPCtSILVRCRST. Ct BUTTERNT. Cir ROAD 62TER- RY. Ct 62NDPlJASMN. Ln66TH PlBL.S.C t MARKET D r BRTH. Dr IVYLnPEARL St ZINN. CtMRGL.Loo p AMY L o op MAVERICK Ct LAMBCtMERCEDESCt WAGATE St W PEARL St QUEEN BEE Ct HILBERTLnPEARLStW W E R NETT R d WPEARL St W COURT St SADDLEBRED L o o pPasco 0 430 850 1,300 1,700210 Feet Exhibit A"Item: Lamb 5 LLC Annexation Applicants: Lamb 5 LLC c/ o Ann Rouse File #: ANX 2021- 007 / ZD 2021-007 Proposed Zoning Determination Zone C- AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 11, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Zach Ratkai, Director Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: *Resolution - Lease Agreement with Group Health Foundation for Use of City Facilities I. REFERENCE(S): Resolution Lease II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. ____, with Group Health Foundation for the Use of City Facilities located at 403 West Lewis Street. III. FISCAL IMPACT: This lease will bring in a variable amount of revenue throughout its term. Lease rates have been determined based on prevailing market rate for Pasco, and has a prorated reduction due to value-added improvements the tenant made within their area ahead of occupation. Year Base Rent per sq. ft. (2% increase per year) Annual Base Rent** Monthly Base Rent** Rent Commencement Date – May 31, 2022 9.00 x 1493 $13,437.00 $1,119.75 June 1, 2022 – May 31, 2023 9.18 $13,705.74 1,142.15 June 1, 2023 – May 31, 2027 9.36 $13,979.85 $1,164.99 June 1, 2027 – May 31, 2028 * 9.55 $14,259.45 1,188.29 June 1, 2028 – May 31, 2029 * 9.74 $14,544.64 1,212.05 June 1, 2029 – May 31, 2030 * 9.93 $14,835.53 $1,236.29 Page 177 of 318 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In 2019, the Group Health Foundation (GHF) approached the Pasco Economic Development team about occupation of a downtown location to conduct its non- profit mission in the area. A property search was conducted and it was found that the Pasco Downtown Post Office provided an optimal location for GHF. An agreement for improvements and occupation was made and GHF renovated their upgradesADAoffices, providedto topostthewithinspaceoffice andrestrooms, andpassageways mitigation longallasbestos, of -term improvements the this asset. The improvements provided totaled $75,000. As negotiated, under the proposed agreement lease rates will be discounted on a pro-rated basis for the lessee in order to provide a return on this capital investment of a city-owned facility. The initial term of the lease runs until May 31, 2027, with three (3) one -year options for subsequent renewal provided adequate notice to the City is provided. V. DISCUSSION: Per RCW 35A.11.110 leases of city property must be approved through resolution of the City Council. Staff recommends approval of the proposed lease agreement. Page 178 of 318 Resolution – GH Foundation Lease Agreement - 1 RESOLUTION NO. _____ A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH GROUP HEALTH FOUNDATION FOR THE USE OF CITY FACILITIES LOCATED AT 403 WEST LEWIS STREET. WHEREAS, the City desires to ensure City facilities are utilized to the greatest extent; and WHEREAS, the City, pursuant to RCW 35A.11.010, may contract and be contracted with, may lease, purchase, receive or otherwise acquire real property for the common benefit of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that this lease with Group Health Foundation will benefit the City by providing a health foundation which supports grants for underserved individuals in the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City Council hereby ratifies the Lease Agreement with Group Health Foundation for office space at the Pasco Post Office located at 403 West Lewis Street, Pasco, Washington, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution will take effect immediately. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of 2022. Blanche Barajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorneys Page 179 of 318 LEASE AGREEMENT Pasco Post Office —403 W.Lewis St.,Suite A,Pasco,WA 99301 Interior Office Space —Group Health Foundation 1.PARTIES.This Lease Agreement (“Lease”)is made and entered into effective as of May 1,2021 (the “Effective Date”),by and between the CITY OF PASCO,a municipal corporation Landlord”)and GROUP HEALTH FOUNDATION,a Washingtonnonpro?t corporation (“Tenan ”). 2.PREMISES.Landlord hereby leases to Tenant and Tenant hereby leases and takes from Landlord that certain premises located in the Pasco Post Office (the “Building”)located at 403 W.Lewis Street,Suite A,in the City of Pasco,County of Franklin,State of Washington,as legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto.The leased premises located on the ?rst ?oor,as depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto,consisting of approximately 1493 square feet,more or less (referred to as the “Premises”),together with all improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto,including the nonexclusive right to use the Common Areas of the Building in common with others.The term “Common Areas”means all areas, facilities and building systems that are provided and designated from time to time by Landlord for the general non-exclusive use and convenience of Tenant with other tenants and which are not leased or held for the exclusive use of a particular tenant.Landlord grants to Tenant 24-hour a day ingress and egress to and from the Premises to adjoining public streets and the right to use in common with all other persons entitled to use the same all parking,public entrances,lobbies,hallways,stairways,elevators and other Common Areas. 3.TERM.This Lease shall be in full force and effect upon delivery of the Premises from Landlord to Tenant,free of all occupants and tenancies and in the Delivery Condition (as de?ned below) the “Commencement Date”),which Commencement Date is agreed to be May 1,2021,through May 31, 2027,unless terminated as provided herein (the “Original Term”).The Tenant shall have three (3)options to renew for one (1)year each (each,a “Renewal Term”)upon full &faithful performance of terms & conditions of the Lease so long as Tenant provides Landlord written notice of its exercise of such option not less than three (3)months prior to the expiration date of the Original Term (or applicable Renewal Term).The terms and provisions for a Renewal Term shall be identical with the Original Term,except as to the rent,described below.The Original Term and each Renewal Term(s)are together known as the Term”. 4.TENANT’S WORK.Tenant shall prepare plans and speci?cations for improvements Tenant desires to make to the Premises (“Tenant Im rovements”).Tenant shall provide Landlord with its plans for Landlord’s review and approval within seven(7)days from the date hereof.Landlord may not withhold or condition its approval unless the making or installation of the Tenant Improvements (a) adversely affects the building structure,(b)adversely affects the Building systems,(e)do not comply with applicable laws,(d)affect the exterior appearance of the Building,or (e)would unreasonably interfere with the normal and customary business operations of other tenants in the Building (individually and collectively,a “Design Problem”).If Landlord does not provide Tenant with a written disapproval within fourteen (14)days,the plans for Tenant Improvements shall be deemed approved.In the event Landlord does not approve of Tenant’s plans and speci?cations,it shall provide detailed written reasons for such disapproval,and Tenant shall promptly thereafter resubmit the plans and speci?cations to Landlord,and the process shall be repeated until the plans and speci?cations have been approved,or deemed approved, by Landlord.There shall be no charge by Landlord for the review of plans or any inspectionsthat Landlord Lease Agreement -1 4812-9159-3927v.9 0107788-000004 Page 180 of 318 deems necessary with regard to any Tenant Improvements,nor shall Landlord receive any fee for pro?t, overhead,general conditions or supervision,in connection with Tenant Improvements constructed by Tenant. 4.1.1.In lieu of a tenant improvement allowance,Tenant shall receive a credit against Base Rent in the amount of Seventy—FiveThousand Dollars ($75,000),to be applied until fully paid (the “Allowance Credit”). 4.1.2.Tenant shall,subject to Landlord’s reasonable approval (which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed),choose and supervise a general contractor to perform Tenant Improvements.All contractors shall provide proof of typical insurance before commencement of work. Tenant,its contractors and subcontractors,shall have unimpaired access to the Premises,with adequate power continuously available at the Premises.Tenant and Tenant’s contractors,subcontractors,architects, engineers,and designers shall not be charged for theuse of elevators,restrooms,loading docks,parking or utilities during Tenant’s move into the Building.Landlord shall run the HVAC twenty-four (24)hours per day for the seven (7)day period immediately prior to the date Tenant anticipates commencing business operations to ?ush out new ?nish odors.Tenant shall give Landlord fourteen (14)days’notice of the date Tenant anticipates commencing business operations. 5.RENT AND OTHER CHARGES.Subject to the application of the Allowance Credit, Rent payments shall commenceon the earlier to occur of:(i)the date Tenant receives a Certi?cate of Occupancy for the Premises;or (ii)the date Tenant opens for business (the “Rent Commencement Date”). Rent shall be pro-rated for the first month should the Lease commence on any other day than the ?rst day of the month.Subsequent monthly rent payments shall be payable in advance,on or before the ?rst day of each month of the Term.Rent shall be payable to Landlord without demand and without deduction, setoff or counterclaim. 5.1.Rent.Base Rent rates will be in the amounts stipulated as set forth below.Tenant shall pay a late service charge on all past due rent at the rate of ?ve percent (5%)of the unpaid amount, but in no event higher than the legal limit.Increase in rent percentages are as shown below. Lease Agreement —2 4812-9159-3927v.9 0107788-000004 Page 181 of 318 w—.-.,._..._~..rr Year Base Rent per sq.ft.Annual Base Monthly Base 2%increase per Rent**Rent** year) Rent Commencement $9.00 x 1493 $13,437.00 $1,119.75 Date —May 31,2022 June 1,2022—May3l,$9.18 $13,705.74 $1,142.15 2023 June 1,2023 —May 31,$9.36 $13,974.48 $1,164.54 2024 June 1,2024—May31,$9.55 $14,258.15 $1,188.18 2025 June 1,2025~May31,$9.74 $14,541.82 $1,211.82 2026 June 1,2026 —May 31,$9.94 $14,840.42 $1,236.70 2027 June 1,2027—May3l,$10.14 $15,139.02 $1,261.59 2028 * June 1,2028 —May 31,$10.34 $15,437.62 $1,286.47 2029 * June 1,2029—May31,$10.54 $15,736.22 $1,311.35 2030 * Indicates Renewal Term Per Section 4.1.1 (above),a credit against the base rent shall be applied until the Allowance Credit has been paid.In the event that Tenant decides not to enter into a Renewal Term,the Tenant shall forfeit any outstanding balance to the Landlord. 5.2.Leasehold Excise Tax.In addition to the monthly rent amount,Tenant shall also pay statutory Leasehold Excise Tax (currently 12.84%,or as otherwise increased/decreased by statute,of each monthly rent payment),which Excise Tax shall be paid to Landlord in the manner required in this Section 5 of this Lease by the first day of each month,upon Tenant’s receipt of a statement of such Excise Tax amount due from Landlord.Initial tax amount will be determined by Landlord and shall increase as the base rent increases and/or as the statutory percentage changes. 5.3.Securigg Deposit. 5.3.1.Upon execution of this Lease,Tenant shall deposit the sum equal to one (1) months’rent with Landlord as a security deposit.This sum shall guarantee Tenant’s performance of its obligations hereunder.If Tenant fails to perform any of its obligations hereunder,Landlord may apply the appropriate portion of the security deposit to cure the default or to compensate the Landlord for damage it has sustained as a result of Tenant’s default.In the event that Landlord deems it necessary to use monies from the Security Deposit in order to secure Tenant’s,compliance with the provisions of this lease, Landlord shall provide Tenant Written notice of Landlord’s intent to apply monies from the deposit for such purpose. 5.3 .2.If any portion of the deposit is so used,Tenant shall,within ?fteen (15)days of demand,deposit sufficient cash with the Landlord to restore the security deposit to its original amount. 5.3.3.If Tenant fully performs its obligations under this Lease,the security deposit or any balance thereof shall be returned to the Tenant at the expiration of this Lease,or after Tenant has Lease Agreement -3 4812-9l59—3927v.9 0107788-000004 Page 182 of 318 vacated the Premises,whichever is later,provided that Landlord may retain the security deposit until such time as any amount due from the Tenant to Landlord has been paid in full. 6.USE OF PREMISES.The Premises shall be used by Tenant for administrativeof?ce and for other uses incidental thereto and for no other use or purpose without Landlord’s prior written consent. 7.RESTRICTIONS ON USE.In connection with the use of the Premises,Tenant shall: 7.1.Refrain from any use that would be offensive to other tenants at the Premises or users of neighboring premises or that would tend to create a nuisance or damage the reputation of the Premises. 7.2.Not permit its customers or clients to cause litter,garbage or other re?lse or-debris to accumulate on the Premises except in suitable garbage containers. 7.3.Signs.Tenant shall not erect signage without Landlord’s prior written consent,not to be unreasonably withheld,and as is consistent with Pasco Municipal Code Title 17. 8.CARE OF PREMISES.Tenant shall use ordinary care in its use of the Premises,and repair any damage caused by itsnegligence,reasonable wear and tear excepted. 9.LANDLORD’S REPRESENTATIONS,WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS. Landlord hereby represents and warrants to Tenant that it has the full right,power and authority to lease the Premises to Tenant.Landlordrepresents and warrants to Tenant that the consent or approval of any third party,including,withoutlimitation,a lender,is not required with respect to the execution of this Lease,or if any such third party consent or approval is required,Landlord has obtained any and all such consents or approvals.Except asspeci?cally set forth herein,neither Landlord nor its agents have made any representations with respect to the Premises.No rights,easements,or licenses are acquired by Tenant by implication or otherwise except as expressly set forth in the provisions of this Lease.The taking of possession of the leased property by the Tenant shall be conclusive evidence that the Premises were in good condition at the timepossessionwas taken.TENANT ACCEPT S THE PREMISES AS-IS,except that upon delivery the Premises(including all access points to the Premises)will be in sound condition both structurally and mechanically;water tight;with all systems and utilities in good working order and stubbed to the Premises;?ee ofmaterials harmful to persons or property (including toxic molds,biotoxins, radon,asbestos and other Hazardous Materials regulated by law);broom clean and free of all debris, fumiture,?xtures,and equipment;and free of latent defects (the “Deliveg Condition”). 10.QUIET ENJOYMENT.Landlord agrees that so long as Tenant observes and performs all of the agreements and covenantsrequired of it hereunder,Tenant shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Premises forthe Lease term without any encumbrance,interference or hindrance by Landlord,its agents or employees. 11.UTILITIES,REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE.Landlord shall provide,at its own expense,all utilities serving thePremises,including electrical service,heating and cooling,water,sewer, and gas.Landlord shall also maintainand repair the Premises,Building and Common Areas,except for maintenance or repairs requiredas a result of Tenant’s negligence.Tenant shall give Landlord access to the Premises at all reasonable times upon not less than forty—eight(48)hours advance notice (except in case of an emergency in which case no notice shall be necessary),without charge or diminution of rent, to enable Landlord to examinethe same and to make such repairs,additions and alterations as Landlord may deem advisable or is required hereunder,provided that Landlord shall use commercially reasonable efforts to minimize any interference with Tenant’s business,and following completion of the work,and Lease Agreement -4 4812-9159—3927v.9Ol07788—00O004 Page 183 of 318 shall return Tenant’s ?xtures,property and equipmentto the original locations and condition.Tenant shall have access to the Premises and all parking 24-hours per day,365 days per year. 12.TAXES.Tenant shall pay all taxes assessed against and levied upon Tenant’s trade xtures,and all other personal property of Tenant contained in or around the Premises. 13.INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY. 13.1.Workers’Compensation.The Tenant must maintain Workers’Compensation insurance in compliance with all applicable statutes.The policy shall also provide Employer’s Liability stop gap coverage with limits of not less than $500,000 Bodily Injury each accident,$500,000 Bodily Injury by disease,policy limit,and $500,000 Bodily Injury by disease,each employee. 13.2.General Liabiligg.The Tenant must maintain insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Of?ce (ISO)occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover premises and contractual liability.The City of Pasco shall be named as an additional insured on Lessee’s Commercial General Liability insurance policy using ISO Form CG 20 11,Additional Insured-Managers or Lessors of Premises or a substitute endorsement providing at least as broad coverage.Commercial General liability insurance shall be Writtenwith limits no less than $2,000,000 each occurrence,$2,000,000 general aggregate. 13.3.PrimmInsurance.The Lessee’s Commercial General Liability insurance policy or policies are to contain,or be endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance as respect the Public Entity.Any insurance,self-insurance,or self-insured pool coverage maintained by the Public Entity shall be excess of the Lessee’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. 13.4.Tenant Propegy Insurance.The Tenant must keep in force for the duration of the Lease a policy covering damages to its property at the Premises including any improvements with no coinsurance provisions.The amount of coverage shall be sufficient to replace the damaged property,loss of use,and must comply with any ordinance or law requirements. 13.5.Hazardous Materials Coverage.Tenant must carry suf?cient coverage,to the reasonable satisfaction of Landlord,for damage caused by Hazardous Materials.Said coverage to be of an amount and type consistent with industry standards and at a rate that is commercially reasonable. 13.6.Adjustment to Insurance Coverage Limits.The coverage limits set forth herein shall be increased at the time of any Renewal Term to limits as reasonably speci?ed by Landlord. 13.7.Additional Insured —Certi?cate of Insurance.The Tenant shall provide,prior to occupancy,evidence of the required insurance in the form of a Certi?cate of Insurance issued by a company (rated not less than A:VII or better according to Best’s),licensed to do business in the state of Washington,which includes all coverages required in this Section 13.Tenant will list the Landlord as an AdditionalInsured on the Commercial General Liability policy.The Certi?cate(s)shall also provide the coverage may not be canceled,non-renewed,or materially changed without thirty (30)days prior written notice to the Landlord. 13.8.State-required Insurances.Tenant shall carry insurance coverage that satisfies all Washington State required insurances at the required limits and shall list Landlord as Additional Insured on all such policies,as applicable. 13.9.Landlord’s Insurance.Landlord shall maintain so called “all risk”property insurance on the Building at one hundred percent (100%)of replacement cost,together with such other insurance coverage as Landlord may elect to maintain. Lease Agreement —5 4812-9l59—3927v.90107788-000004 Page 184 of 318 13.10.Indemnity.Subject to Section 13.11 below,each party herebyagrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other party,its af?liates,and their respective directors,employees and agents from and against any and all third party suits,claims,actions,demands,liabilities,expenses and/orlosses, including reasonable legal expenses and reasonable attorneys’fees (“Losses”)to the extent such Losses result from any of the following,but except to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of the other party:(a)breach of warranty by the indemnifying party contained in this Lease;(b)breach of this Lease by the indemnifying party;or (c)negligence or willful misconduct of the indemnifying party,or their respective directors,employees and agents in connection with this Lease. 13.11.Waiver of Subrogation.Landlord and Tenant hereby release the other from any and all liability or responsibility to the other or anyone claiming through or under them by way of subrogation or otherwise for any loss or damage to property caused by ?re or any other perils insured in policies of property insurance covering such property,even if such loss or damage shall have been caused by the fault or negligence of the other party,or anyone for whom such party may be responsible.All of Tenant’s and Landlord’spolicies of property insurance shall contain waiver of subrogation endorsements in favor of the other party and copies of same shallbe delivered upon request. 13.12.Duty to_Maintain Insurance.Failure on the part of the Lessee to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of lease,upon which the Public Entity may,after giving ?ve business days’noticeto the Lessee to correct the breach,terminate the Lease or,at its discretion,procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith,with any sums so expended to be repaid to the Public Entity on demand. 13.13.Full Availabili?of Limits.If the Lessee maintains higher insurance limits than the minimums shown above,the PublicEntity shall be insured for the ?ill available limits of Commercial General and Excess or Umbrella liability maintained by the Lessee,irrespective of whether such limits maintained by the Lessee are greater than those required by this Lease or whether any certi?cate of ' insurance furnished to the PublicEntity evidences limits of liability lower than those maintained by the Lessee. 14.DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION;CONDEMNATION.If the Premises are damaged or destroyed in whole or in material part;or if the Premises or a substantial portion thereof are taken by condemnation or under the power of eminent domain,Landlord or Tenant may,at its option,elect to terminate this tenancy.If the Lease is not so terminated,Landlord shall promptly make any and all necessary repairs. 15.SURRENDER AT EXPIRATION.Upon expiration of the Lease term or earlier termination on account of default,Tenant shall surrender the Premises in good condition and repair, reasonable wear and tear excepted,damage by Landlord,casualty and condemnationexcepted. 16.DEFAULT.Tenantshall be in default of this Lease if it (a):fails to pay any sum,including Base Rent,due under this Leasefollowing ?ve business (5)days’written notice from Landlord of the failure to pay,or (b)fails to complywith any tenn or condition or ful?ll any obligation of the Lease and the failure continues for a periodof 30 days after written notice by Landlord to Tenant,provided,however, that if the nature of Tenant’-s obligation is such that more than thirty (30)days are required for performance,then Tenant shallnot be in default if Tenant commences performance Withinsuch thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecutes the same to completion.In the event of a default,this Lease may be terminated at theoption of Landlord by written notice to Tenant.Whether or not the Lease is terminated by the election of Landlord or otherwise,Landlord shall be entitled to recover damages from Tenant and Landlord may retake possession of the Premises and reserves any other remedy available to Lease Agreement -6 4812-9159-3927v.9 0107788-000004 Page 185 of 318 the Landlord under the applicable law;provided,however,that Landlord shall:(a)use good faith, commercially reasonable efforts to mitigate its damages arising out of any Tenant default;(b)not be entitled to accelerate the payment of Rent;(c)not be entitled to a “landlord’s lien”against any of Tenant’s personal property or trade ?xtures;and (d)not be entitled to dispossess Tenant of the Premises pursuant to any “lock-ou ”or other non-judicial remedy.Under no circumstances shall Tenant be required to waive any defenses,counterclaims or rights it may have under applicable law to cure defaults or prevent Lease termination or eviction. 16.1.Landlord’s Default.Should Landlord default in the performance of any covenants and/or conditions on the Landlord’s part herein contained,and if such default is not cured within thirty 30)days after written notice by the Tenant to Landlord thereof,except in case of an emergency in which case no noticeshall be necessary and no opportunity to cure shall apply,or if such default cannot be cured within thirty (30)days,then if the Landlord does not notify Tenant of delay or does not commence within such thirty (30)days to cure said default and cure the same with all reasonable dispatch,Tenant shall have the right to cure said default for the account of Landlord,and Landlord shall upon demand,reimburse Tenant for Tenant’s costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith.Nothing contained in this Paragraph 15.1 shall be construed so as to abridge any rights otherwise available to Tenant at law or in equity. 17.MISCELLANEOUS. 17.1..Environmental Compliance by Tenant.Tenant shall not cause or permit any Hazardous Material to be brought upon,kept or used in or about the Premises.Landlord,to its knowledge, as of the Effective Date hereby represents and warrants that (a)the Premises and Building do not contain Hazardous Materials;(b)the Premises and Building have not been used in violation of any environmental laws;and (c)the Premises and Building are in compliance with environmental laws as of the Commencement Date.Tenant shall have no responsibility for any Hazardous Materialsthat:(i)existed on the Premises before the Commencement Date;or (ii)were caused by Landlord,its agents,employees, or contractors;or (iii)that Tenant can demonstrate migrated onto the Premises from a source off-Premises that was not caused by Tenant.As used herein,the tenn “Hazardous Material”means any hazardous or toxic substance,material,or waste which is or becomes regulated by any local governmental authority, the state of Washington or the United States government.The term “Hazardous Material”includes, without limitation,any material or substance that is:(a)de?ned as a “hazardous waste,”“extremely hazardous waste,”“restricted hazardous Waste,”“hazardous substance,”“hazardous material,”or “waste” under any federal,state or local law;(b)petroleum;and (c)asbestos.The provisions of this Section 17.1, including,without limitation,the indemni?cation provisions set forth herein,shall survive any termination of this Lease. 17.2.Non-waiver.Waiver by either party of strict performance of any provision of this Lease shall not be a waiver of or prejudice to the party’s right to require strict performance of the same provision or of any other provision in the future. 17.3.Notices.Any notice will be deemed delivered:(a)when personally delivered;(b) when delivered by facsimile or electronic mail transmission (in either case,with con?rmation of delivery); c)on the day following delivery of the notice by reputable overnight courier;or (d)on the day following delivery of the notice by mailing by certi?ed or registered U.S.mail,postage prepaid,return receipt requested;and in any case shall be sent to the applicable party at its address as set forth in Section 18 below.Addresses for notices may be changed from time to time by written notice to all other parties pursuant to this Section 17.3. Lease Agreement -7 4812-9159-3927v.9 0107788-000004 Page 186 of 318 17.4.Time of Essence.Time is of the essence of the performance of each of the obligations under this Lease. 17.5.Recording of Lease.This Lease need not be recorded. 17.6.Rules and Regulations.Tenant shall observe reasonable Rules and Regulations established and amended by Landlord for the Premises from time to time upon 30 days advance,written notice from Landlord to Tenant so long as any such rules,amendments or supplements do not adversely affect Tenant’s use of the Premises or expenses incurred under this Lease.Tenant shall have a reasonable opportunity to comment on proposed rules and regulations.The Rules are in addition to and shall not be construed to modify or amend this Lease in any way,and to the extent the Rules con?ict with the Lease the terms of the Lease shall control. 17.7.Assignment.Tenant shall not assign or transfer this Lease without Landlord’s prior consent,which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld,conditioned,or delayed. Notwithstanding anything in thisSection 17.7 to the contrary,Tenant may,without Landlord’s consent, but after providing written noticeto Landlord,assign this Lease or sublet all or any portion of the Premises to:(a)any Related Entity (as definedbelow);(b)to a person or entity acquiring all or substantially all of Tenant’s assets;(c)to a person or entity that acquires by merger,consolidation,or otherwise all or substantially all of the ownership interests in and control of Tenant.“Related Entity”means any parent company,subsidiary,affiliate or related corporate entity of Tenant that controls,is controlled by,or is under common control with Tenant. 17.8.Alterations,Improvements and Additions.Tenant shall make no alterations, improvements or additionsto thePremises without Landlord’s prior consent.Landlord may not withhold or condition its consent unless the making or installation of theimprovements or alterations (a)adversely affects the Building structure,(b)adversely affects the Building systems,(e)do not comply with applicable laws,(d)affect the exterior appearance of the Building,or (e)a Design Problem. 17.9.Compliancewith Laws,Ordinances and Regulations.Tenant shall comply with all laws,ordinancesand regulations of any governmental agency or public authority having jurisdiction with respect to Tenant’s specificuse and buildout of the Premises. 17.10.Responsible Pgty.Following is the name and phone number of Tenant’s representative which may be contactedinan emergency:Cory Sbarbaro,Executive Vice President,(866) 389-5532. 17.11.Tenant to Supp_lyInformation.The Tenant shall,whenever requested by the Landlord to do so,furnish to the Landlord full and correct contact information for staff members working at the Premises,as may be requested by the Landlord. 17.12.Parking.Tenant,its employees,agents,contractors,and invitees,shall have the use in common with other tenants lofthe Building of the parking lot on the Property at no additional cost.As of the signing of this lease there are four (4)unreserved parking stalls available for Building tenants. 17.13.Dispute Resolution.Should any dispute arise concerning the enforcement, interpretation,breach or any otherterm of this Agreement,the parties shall first meet in a good faith effort to resolve the dispute.In the event the dispute cannot be resolved by agreement of the parties or by mediation,the dispute shall be resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A,as amended,and the Mandatory Rules of Arbitration (MAR).Venue shall be placed in Franklin County,Washington;the laws of the State of Washington shall apply;and the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable Lease Agreement -8 4812-9159-3927v.9 0107788—000004 Page 187 of 318 attorney fees and costs.LANDLORD AND TENANT HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO REQUIRETHAT ANY DISPUTE UNDER THIS LEASE BE HEARD BEFORE A JURY. 17.14.Discrimination.Tenant shall not discriminate against any passenger because of sex,age,race,color,creed,national origin,marital status or the presence of any disability,including sensory,mental or physical handicap. 17.15.Tenant’s Property.Landlord agrees that all furnishings,furniture,?xtures, equipment,inventory,merchandise,goods,chattels,trade ?xtures,signage,appliances and other personal property of Tenant at any time located on the Premises,(collectively,“Tenant’s Pro e ”),shall be and at all times remain the sole and absolute property ofTenant,regardless of whether the same (x)is af?xed to the Premises,or (y)may now or hereafter be regarded as a ?xture or as property of Landlord by operation of law or otherwise.Tenant shall have the right at any time and fromtime to time during the Term to remove any Tenant’s Property from the Premises;provided,however,that Tenant shall repair all damage caused by such removal of Tenant’s Property. 17.16.Successors.Subject to Section 17.7,this Lease shall bind and inure to the bene?t of the parties,their respective heirs,successors,and permitted assigns. 17.17.Time of the Essence.Time is of the essence of each and every provision hereof.If the ?nal date of any period of time set forth herein occurs on a Saturday,Sunday or legal holiday,then in such event,the expiration of such period of timeshall be postponed to the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. 17.18.Force Majeure.Except for the Commencement Date,Landlord and Tenant shall be excused for the period of delay in the performance of any of their obligations hereunder,and shall not be considered in default,and all time periods permitted hereunder for the performance of any such term, covenant,or condition shall be tolled on a day-for—daybasis upon written notice from either party to the other of such party’s inability to perform or satisfy any such term,covenant,or condition of this Lease due to a Force Majeure.For purposes hereof,“Force Majeure”means strikes,lockouts,labor disputes, shortages of labor,?re or other casualty,Acts of God,or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of a party,including,but not limited to,events of nature (including snow or ice storm,tornadoes, windstorms,?ooding and severe weather),civil disturbances,interruptions by government or court order, valid orders of any regulatory body having proper jurisdiction,pandemics and epidemics,wars,riots, inability to secure materials (including inability to secure materials by reason of allocations promulgated by authorized governmental agencies but not including any such inability to obtain materials due to cost), and inability to obtain permits due to any of the foregoing. 17.19.Entire Agreement.This Lease and the covenants and agreements set forth herein are and shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties.None of these terms,covenants,and agreements of this Lease shall in any manner be altered,waived or changed,except by written instrument signed and delivered by the parties hereto. 17.20.Counterparts.This Lease may be executed in counterparts all of which taken together shall be deemed one original when executed by both parties.Furthermore,the parties agree that i)this Lease may be transmitted between them by electronic mail and (ii)electronic signatures (including electronic copies of manual signatures)shall have the effect of original signatures relative to this Lease. 18.NOTICES.Notice address are set forth as follows: To Landlord:To Tenant: Lease Agreement -9 4812-9l59—3927v.90107788-000004 Page 188 of 318 City of Pasco Group Health Foundation PO Box 293 801 Third Ave.,Suite 220 Pasco WA 99301 Seattle,WA 98104 Attn:Director of Admin &Comm Services Attn:Cory Sbarbaro,Executive Vice President With a copy to (but such copy shall not With a copy to (but such copy shall not constitute constitute notice):notice): Kerr Ferguson Law,PLLC Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 7025 W.Grandridge BLVD,Ste A 920 Fifth Ave.,Suite 3300 Kennewick,WA 99336 Seattle,WA 98104 Attn:Eric W.Ferguson Attn:Heather A.Coldwell Remainder ofpage is blank;signatures follow] Lease Agreement -10 4812-9159-3927v.90107788-000004 Page 189 of 318 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed or caused this instrument as of dates written below. Landlord: CITY OF PASCO Lease Agreement -11 4812-9159-3927v.9 0107788-000004 Tenant: GROUP HEALTH FOUNDATION, a Washington nonpro?t corporation z,zs:r.:*rq:*;z:2«‘=$-‘»‘fa”«f"4*—~’1“v*’-~gr.z,;’—‘3.*»*=.?245::Jzsxtm K . 5.‘ By:”is 7 {_;7i‘¥*>'r-r?bélii10 -iT~'«73E§ X I'.-'!»',‘*‘-"3”‘‘Q;\'-:3‘f‘:r:Lkn‘K“. Cory Sbarbaro,Exe)gT;:u’t-1- xr‘e'V‘\‘/'~1n'c’e’:}"ref§1«de t" 3 3383 get ‘amt. Date:0 0+ l 3}‘ IL 5“‘I J: A ,.~_._v§:4‘ K5.-Q;‘z“E’7 ..“‘§§~,,v 5:‘1:5‘~~»;;'?'3”"§‘H.'1 Q .§,r_',‘t$4 4,!“‘F.’5" M «:3 '1‘ er ;,y'»;_ 1’’xv‘ 7‘~*i’»:..‘i ”" 0.'3;:}''-‘,3;-..,‘z _r.."2 Hi I-a 9;‘" 1.,1’>- 32?‘kg“~JSLEQ *~‘:~ tg‘n',’I -e J‘C’:-2,‘-W;-W.ri?‘* I D ~':":“.‘.'l'}':'1¢I1);u‘;oi;»‘a ‘Jan‘=5 Page 190 of 318 Acknowledgments: LANDLORD: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) zss County of Franklin ) On this day personally appeared before me DAVE ZABELL,City Manager for the City of Pasco, Washington,described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of P<pQI L-,2022. Notary Public i and for the State of Washington Residing at 4300 9 "I’I‘!-1?:My Commission Expires I PRLCULWL‘ NOTARYPUBLIC#208573;; STATEOF WASHINGTON: COMMISSIONEXPIRES’ JULY 19.2023 TENANT: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) zss County of King On this day personally appeared before me CORY SBARBARO,Executive Vice President of GROUP HEALTH FOUNDATION,described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ?44'»day of QQK‘.3 ,2022. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at 525 1:35 553;6+ My Commission Expires la—50 —ZQZ 5 Lease Agreement -12 4812-9159-3927v.9 0107788-000004 Page 191 of 318 EXHIBIT A Legal Description Legal:tiesclip?on for pmpverizrat aha address -D3103W‘Lewis3!,Fame WA as f:3§lows: mat part 91‘Smao?Btecta:Avdd?tloaasmeCity 42%Pasm.Washirzgbcm,desscihéd as Lots number“; cine 1 3.‘Maia,,{twee {3}amE-‘mar14%)and mat part of Let Number Five g5;mmid Saunas! mack 35.12!pm.cl «:3as ?ulzawshagirmirzgat the swmeasmriy -tamer oersalii Let Five %the paint 3!beginning tthaenoesmstmewesm?yakaregthe Semthtine afsaid act,a distazrm of iwwly (35)met: mantraina nnrtheastariy dire?ian.gasa?leiwishmeWest lme0?said ?at.a -distanceof cm hundred and foafy{1~§O§feat 50131%a?ey insaid black;l?ertae aiang the Hum ?ne of said latFM3,a diatanaa of twenty{$11}fee:2::tha_n::r£heasteriy comer(2%said fat,finance,in a sou?1w$im£3r dirac?cn,ateng East linea?wd test,a drasmca-ca‘ewehundred and feriy 140}feet.in the ‘:22cf mebeginning: a?amurzmngEnwepiata‘?sawSchuoaEfoaécAdd?ionan ~k in £13 amca the Emmy Auditor sf FIEHEGEIIGounty,Wasmntan.and recmde?EnBank R0.33.at game 135.pf Bead Rarpoz?s.said $2333431? pa'9?|$at [am magan =being inSewm ‘M «name(29),TcngamshipMme {9}Nmm an‘Range may 8}$31;af the ellmze?eMmsiian. Lease Agreement —13 4812-9159—3927v.90107788-000004 Page 192 of 318 EXHIBIT B Premises 111113! M.«\1HNGDOCK 1'lO?WN|"?¢I?HIF?K'IIV‘I!IT%- vauvmwmmlrtvxrrr. waznsmrxtvnnu-ocwwnn-r;vnannau:u.:m:su:yamuwansamz mint Im'A:.r.mu uum1umummmun 12mmumuuvnmumnmomununn Iunrrnlmesnaan coo1x:hx:=&IIn:rn:c:'kbt.I nwanmrwmmxnmxmumnmnsnm cutmmumwbmun uwa:ca:uv.:~.-wan 3‘aznuvrcutrnauxawunoaa.nnuntfotrllnv}nnnusruunsranum-an uwtntuulnuca mxncczaac?lnnfnanl.Mrlrun 43:1-«statue: v../wv./W.:(x\~\>svx>.x yo Dc-1-I HE‘;:r -z‘: 2 sun ,5 3'3 ‘\ 3 E;..sm1Rs2 go.. 9 t as 3,. 1; J , i I z.»-M-:::»-*m'—:.*s:—as1»-9.4-M-»::3 ms1Qm::E_nDR1:&QQM is Vx._ 1 a.,»‘ OFFIG3:‘.-‘I ml;_ME_3_< ex ,.g gnoupnunuggq /5,,‘_= 1 I 0,? 3 1>nuuuau=tn—."\3 z D=I:|=I:]=5 T?,’1..,.;smvzcnonsv 2,.4 a<-.~«~-«~« Ii xi‘: B‘ as» Bsm?i?amsl J.\>,)\[m....,,m ,K M REMODELFLOOR PLAN GRU£?H£.ALT1-1Fomn)A'nce:es-j—-T mm‘t.§:..‘i..m I 4 U 11?‘ 2550“! Lease Agreement -14 4812-9159-3927V.9 0107788-000004 Page 193 of 318 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 23, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Steve Worley, Director Public Works SUBJECT: *Resolution - Change Order No. 1 to the Design Build of America Phase 1 Agreement for the Zone 3 Water Storage Reservoir Project I. REFERENCE(S): Resolution Change Order No. 1 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. ______, authorizing the City Manager to execute Change Order No. 1 to the Design Build Institute of America Phase 1 Agreement with T Bailey, Inc. for the Progressive Design -Build services for the Zone 3 Water Storage Reservoir project. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Original Agreement: $388,961.76 Change Order No. 1 (proposed) $608,373.89 New Agreement Total $997,335.65 This project is funded through a $10M Public Works Board low-interest loan and Water utility Rates. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: As Council is aware, the City's water system requires additional water storage in Zone 3 to serve future development and growth around the area. The City opted to Progressivetheuse Design-theseconstructto (PDB) processBuild improvements. On November 1, 2021, Council approved the PDB of America Phase 1 Agreement 3ZoneReservoirStorageWaterBailey, forInc. Twith the Progressive Design Build. Page 194 of 318 The City’s primary objective in utilizing the Design -Build procurement approach was to bring the best available design and construction experience and expertise together to successfully meet the unique challenges presented by this project. The selected Design-Build team is expected to enter into a series of agreements with the City for a final goal of determining a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). V. DISCUSSION: Given the supply chain disruptions experienced in the construction industry, it has been identified that the transmission main piping, yard piping, mechanical piping, and associated fittings and valves were the longest lead items in the project at this time. Delivery times from the date of order range from 20 to 24 weeks. These excessive long lead times will have a negative impact on the already challenging schedule for the Zone 3 Water Storage Reservoir. The advanced acquisition of materials for the installation of the transmission piping, yard piping, and mechanical piping feeding the tanks is a viable option to offset potential delays in the project schedule's critical path, as well as limit price volatility. With the proposed Change Order No.1, the design-build team will purchase the materials theirformonths, 6 timelyinthemreceiveandapproximately installation. This change order precedes the negotiation of a GMP for the project. Yet, a delay in ordering these materials would hinder the ability to have the tank operational by late 2023. Risks associated with the change order are minimized by the fact that these materials are specific to water main installation, and the City would own the material at the time the materials are ordered. Additionally , unlike other more complex portions of the project, the design of this supply and distribution waterline for the project is not subject to change or elimination as the project design advances. The pipe size and alignment are consistent with the approved 2019 Comprehensive Water System Plan and the 2021 Northwest Water System Analysis Technical Memorandum, and are further supported by the design of the current project. City staff and the design-build team coordinated to itemize all components to be acquired priceproposedtheandthroughproposedthe ischangeorder reasonable based on current market conditions. The proposed change order includes an escalation contingency, which is intended to absorb any potential increases in price between the date the quote was provided by the supplier and the date the order is actually made. Page 195 of 318 Given that T Bailey is already under contract with the City, this allows for the early acquisition of materials with long lead times. The agreed upon compensation for this change order is in advance of negotiating the full construction contract; not in addition to it. This change order does not expand the scope of the project. In a project with a conventional delivery methodology, this type of acquisition would be handled through the “Materials on Hand request” or “Materials pre-purchase” procedure. Both are typical processes in the construction industry. Staff recommends execution of Change Order No. 1 to the Agreement with T Bailey, Inc. for the Zone 3 Water Storage Reservoir Progressive Design Build project in the amount of $608,373.89. Page 196 of 318 Resolution – CO-1 for Water Storage Reservoir Zone 3 Progressive Design Build Project - 1 RESOLUTION NO. _______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE DESIGN BUILD INSTITUTE OF AMERICA PHASE 1 AGREEMENT WITH T BAILEY, INC. FOR THE PROGRESSIVE DESIGN- BUILD SERVICES FOR THE ZONE 3 WATER STORAGE RESERVOIR PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City and T Bailey, Inc. entered into an Agreement on November 21, 2021, to provide progressive design-build services; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, pursuant to RCW 39.80.050(1), has negotiated a fair and reasonable Design Build Institute of America (DBIA) Phase 1 Agreement with T Bailey, Inc. based on the estimated value of the services including their scope, complexity, and professional nature; and WHEREAS, the DBIA Phase 1 Agreement provides for 60% design and permitting activities; and WHEREAS Change Order No. 1 to the Agreement was negotiated to allow for early acquisition of pipeline materials to offset the long lead-in ductile iron pipe and fittings associated with this project; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $608,373.89 (including Sales Tax) exceeds the City Manager’s authority and thus requires Council approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That Change Order No. 1 to the Design Build Institute of America (DBIA) Phase 1 Agreement with T Bailey, Inc. is to account for potable water line materials such as pipe and fittings, and Be It Further Resolved that the City Manager, for the City of Pasco, is hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 1 to the Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto, and incorporated by this reference, as Exhibit A. Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately. Page 197 of 318 Resolution – CO-1 for Water Storage Reservoir Zone 3 Progressive Design Build Project - 2 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this ______ day of June 2022. Blanche Barajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorneys Page 198 of 318 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT – CIP ENGINEERING Page 1 Phase 1 Contract Change Order City of Pasco PO Box 293/525 N 3rd Ave Pasco, WA 99301 T Bailey, Inc. 9628 South Marchs Point Rd. Anacortes, WA 98221 Project Name: Zone 3 Reservoir Storage Tank Change Order#: 1 COR# Description of Change Change in Contract Time Change in Phase 1 NTE a Advance purchase of long lead items for water main: piping materials, fittings and appurtenances. The amount is based on the amount for materials set forth in Exhibit A and includes Design-Builder’s Fee Percentage* (3.7%) as well as a contingency to account (20%) for escalation in price from the date of Exhibit A. 0 $608,373.89 b Extension of time of performance for delivery of GMP submittal 71 calendar days $0 Notwithstanding Section 6.2.3 of the Design -Build Agreement, the cost of the materials purchased pursuant to this Change Order shall be excluded from the Cost of the Work when calculating the Lump Sum Fee. Original Phase 1 Not to Exceed Amount $388,961.76 Net change by previous authorized Change Orders $0 Total net [check one] X Increase / Decrease in the Phase 1 NTE by this Change Order 608, 373.89 New Phase 1 NTE including this Change Order $997, 335.65 The new Contract Time including this Change Order is: New Phase 1 Completion Date September 9, 2022 New Interim Milestone Dates: The changes in the Phase 1 Not to Exceed Amount and Contract Time identified in this Change Order include all costs and time extensions associated with performing the changes set forth herein. City of Pasco By: ______________________________________ Signature Printed Name Title: ______________________________________ Date: ____________________________________ Design- Builder By: ______________________________________ Signature Printed Name Title: ______________________________________ Date: ____________________________________ EXHIBIT A Page 199 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT – CIP ENGINEERING Page 2 Page 200 of 318 T BAILEY INC 9628 MARCHS POINT RD ANACORTES, WA 98221 Contact: Chris Parker CParker@tbailey.com Job PASCO RES 3 - TBAILEY - JLS Bid Date: 06/03/2022 05:00 pm Bid #: 2375832 Sales Representa ve Johnny Spencer M) 253-254-1298 T) 253-840-8558 F) 253-840-2232 Johnny.Spencer@coreandmain.com Core & Main 602 Valley Ave NE Puyallup, WA 98372 T) 253-840-8558 06/03/2022 - 8:32 AM Actual taxes may vary Page 1 of 5 Bid Proposal for PASCO RES 3 - TBAILEY - JLS CUSTOMERCONTACTNOTESPage 201 of 318 Seq#Qty Descrip on Units Price Ext Price DUE TO CURRENT SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTIONS, MATERIALS ARE SUBJECT TO PRICING AT TIME OF SHIPMENT. MATERIAL AVAILABILITY AND TIMELINESS OF SHIPMENTS CANNOT BE GUARANTEED. THIS TERM SUPERSEDES ALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS. DUE TO ESCALATED PRICES ON SCRAP METAL, RESULTING FROM THE RUSSIA-UKRAINE WAR, A MANUFACTURER IMPOSED SURCHARGE WILL BE ADDED TO ALL SHIPMENTS OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE. AN ESTIMATE OF THE SURCHARGE IS INCLUDED IN THIS BID FOR YOUR REFERENCE. THE MANUFACTURER SURCHARGE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND WILL BE CALCULATED AT THE TIME OF SHIPMENT. 20 PASCO RES 3 MATERIAL LIST 30 REVISION 06/02/22 50 ALL MATERIALS REFLECT IMPORT 60 PRODUCT PRICING & ETA TIMES 80 MATERIAL IS FOB SHIPPING POINT 90 FULL FREIGHT ALLOWED 100 ON FULL TRUCKLOAD SHIPMENTS 110 BUYER TO OFFLOAD 130 DUE TO THE INSTABILITY IN THE 140 CURRENT MARKET - MANUFACTURES 150 HAVE ONLY HELP PRICES FOR 15 160 15 DAYS AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE 170 AFTER THAT TIME FRAME. 190 CURRENT ETA TIMES AFTER 200 APPROVED SUBMITTALS: 210 - DUCTILE PIPE 18 TO 20 WEEKS 220 - SURE STOP GSKT 5 WEEKS 230 - FLOW METER 12 TO 14 WEEKS 240 - CHECK VALVE 20 TO 24 WEEKS 250 - CONTROL VALVE 8 TO 10 WEEKS 260 - FITTINGS STOCK TO 24 WEEKS 270 - EXPANSION JT 8 TO 10 WKS 280 - BUTTERFLY VLV'S 18 TO 20 WKS 290 -BOLT KITS STOCK TO 2 WEEKS 06/03/2022 - 8:32 AM Actual taxes may vary Page 2 of 5 T BAILEY INC Bid Date: 06/03/2022 05:00 pm Core & Main 2375832 Core & Main 602 Valley Ave NE Puyallup, WA 98372 Phone: 253-840-8558 Fax: 253-840-1141 Bid Proposal for PASCO RES 3 - TBAILEY - JLS Page 202 of 318 Seq#Qty Descrip on Units Price Ext Price 300 -MJ RESTRAINTS STOCK TO 16 WKS 320 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED: 330 BFVS & CHECK VALVES 340 - DOES "IN TANK" MEAN THAT 350 THE VALVES ARE SUBMERGED? 360 IF SO, WE'LL NEED TO KNOW THE 370 DEPTH OF SUBMERGENCE TO 380 GET AN ACCURATE QUOTE. 400 FLOW METER: 410 - IS THIS SUBMERGED? 430 CONTROL VALVE 440 -MOST ALL INFORMATION ON THIS 450 VALVE IS NEEDED. 460 THE SPECS CONTAIN ALMOST 470 NOTHING ON THIS VALVE. 480 - WHAT FUNCTION IS THE VALVE 490 DOING AND/OR WHAT FUNCTION DO 500 THEY WANT THE VALVE TO PERFORM 540 LIST OF MATERIALS 05/31/22 550 1595 24 TJ CL52 DI PIPE FT 134.73 214,894.35 CEMENT LINED, STD BIT EXT 570 1 DUCTILE IRON MANUF SURCHARGE DETERMINED AT TIME OF SHIPMENT AND MAYNOTREFLECTQUOTEDPRICE EA 6,255.06 6,255.06 580 38 24 SURE STOP LOCKING GASKET EA 706.53 26,848.14 600 1 24 FLG BUTTERFLY VLV W/ HW EA 6,129.57 6,129.57 PRATT 150# FLG 620 ** CAN ROTATE VALVE 90 DEGREES 630 DURING INSTALLATION TO HAVE 640 ACTUATOR ON SIDE 650 4 24 MJXFLG BUTTERFLY VLV PRATT EA 9,154.64 36,618.56 W/ 2" OP NUT PRATT 150# FLGXMJ 680 4 24 DI MJ LUGGED REST PACK (I) EBAA SEAL GSKT & 16 BOLTS/NUTS (3/4") INCLUDED EA 558.69 2,234.76 690 4 24 MJXFLG ADPT C153 IMP EA 1,275.65 5,102.60 CEMENT LINED, STD BIT EXT 710 4 24 DI MJ LUGGED REST PACK (I) EBAA SEAL GSKT & 16 BOLTS/NUTS (3/4") INCLUDED EA 558.69 2,234.76 720 1 24" FLG X FLG EXPANSION JOINT MJXMJ 4412M20B EA 19,219.24 19,219.24 EBAA W/ 8" EXPANSION 740 1 24 MJ 45 C153 IMP EA 1,362.20 1,362.20 CEMENT LINED, STD BIT EXT 760 2 24 DI MJ LUGGED REST PACK (I) EBAA SEAL GSKT & 16 BOLTS/NUTS (3/4") INCLUDED EA 558.69 1,117.38 770 1 24X8 FLG CROSS C110 IMP EA 3,520.28 3,520.28 CEMENT LINED, STD BIT EXT 790 2 24 FLG TEE C110 IMP EA 4,339.93 8,679.86 06/03/2022 - 8:32 AM Actual taxes may vary Page 3 of 5 Bid Proposal for PASCO RES 3 - TBAILEY - JLS Bid #: 2375832 Page 203 of 318 Seq#Qty Descrip on Units Price Ext Price CEMENT LINED, TN140 PRIMER 810 2 24 MJ L/P SLV C153 IMP EA 1,071.93 2,143.86 CEMENT LINED, STD BIT EXT CONFIRM EXISTING PIPE 840 4 24 DI MJ LUGGED REST PACK (I) EBAA SEAL GSKT & 16 BOLTS/NUTS (3/4") INCLUDED EA 558.69 2,234.76 850 1 24 FLG X FLG SWING CHECK VALVE EA 22,139.35 22,139.35 VALMATIC OR PRATT 870 1 16 FLG X FLG CONTROL VALVE EA 36,952.58 36,952.58 MODEL 210G ALTITUDE VALVE 890 *** NEED MORE INFORMATION 900 BUDGET NUMBER 910 1 16 FLG X FLGFLOW METER EA 14,505.85 14,505.85 E & H PROMAG W 400 ELECTROMAG 930 ** NO CABLE INCLUDED 940 AT THIS TIME. 950 *** NEED MORE INFORMATION 960 BUDGET NUMBER 970 1 16 FLG BUTTERFLY VLV W/ HW EA 4,304.13 4,304.13 PRATT 150# FLG 990 1 12 MJ TEE C153 IMP EA 487.67 487.67 CEMENT LINED, STD BIT EXT 1010 *** SHOULD THE ABOVE BE FLG? 1020 3 12 MJ DI LUGGED RESTR PACK (I)EA 165.93 497.79 1030 1 12 FLG X FLG EXPANSION JOINT EA 6,948.72 6,948.72 EBAA W/ 4" EXPANSION 1050 2 12 MJXFLG ADPT C153 IMP EA 304.54 609.08 CEMENT LINED, STD BIT EXT 1070 2 12 MJ DI LUGGED RESTR PACK (I)EA 165.93 331.86 1080 90 12 TJ CL52 DI PIPE FT 60.95 5,485.50 1090 1 DUCTILE IRON MANUF SURCHARGE DETERMINED AT TIME OF SHIPMENT AND MAYNOTREFLECTQUOTEDPRICE EA 210.33 210.33 1100 5 12 SURE STOP LOCKING GASKET EA 175.24 876.20 1110 28 12 PVC SDR35 SWR PIPE (G) 14'FT 26.28 735.84 1120 2 8 F6106 MJXFLG RW GV OL L/ACC CLOW GATE VALVE EPOXY COATED W/STAINLESSSTEELBOLTS & NUTS EA 1,375.25 2,750.50 1130 2 8 MJ DI LUGGED RESTR PACK (I)EA 86.81 173.62 1140 1 8 F6102 FLG RW GV OL ON CLOW GATE VALVE EPOXY COATED W/STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS & NUTS EA 1,428.30 1,428.30 1150 1 DJ400-8 8 DISMANTLING JT EA 887.52 887.52 EPOXY COATED, STD ZINC BOLTS 1170 1 8 MJXFLG ADPT C153 IMP EA 137.23 137.23 CEMENT LINED, STD BIT EXT 1190 1 8 MJ DI LUGGED RESTR PACK (I)EA 86.81 86.81 1200 36 8 TJ CL52 DI PIPE FT 36.93 1,329.48 1210 1 DUCTILE IRON MANUF SURCHARGE DETERMINED AT TIME OF SHIPMENT AND MAYNOTREFLECTQUOTEDPRICE EA 50.84 50.84 1220 2 8 SURE STOP LOCKING GASKET EA 120.67 241.34 SUBTOTAL 439,765.92 06/03/2022 - 8:32 AM Actual taxes may vary Page 4 of 5 Bid Proposal for PASCO RES 3 - TBAILEY - JLS Bid #: 2375832 Page 204 of 318 Seq#Qty Descrip on Units Price Ext Price 1260 VALVE BOXES 1270 (IF NEEDED) 1280 7 15 931 VALVE BOX TOP DI IMP EA 83.30 583.10 1290 7 931 VALVE BOX LID WATER DI IMP EA 22.69 158.83 1300 7 36" 940 VB BOTTOM IMP EA 81.71 571.97 1310 7 10X6X2 ROUND ETHAFOAM PAD 10" OD 6" ID CIRCULAR EA 7.93 55.51 1320 7 3' VLV EXT STEM F/2"NUT EA 129.23 904.61 SUBTOTAL (Avg. Based On 7EA)2,274.02 Average price per EA 324.86 1360 PER EACH FLANGE KITS 1370 *** CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE 1380 QUANTITY NEEDED (NO PLANS) *** 1400 24" FLG BOLT KIT 1410 24 24 ZINC HEX BOLT & NUT KIT EA 175.99 4,223.76 1420 24 24X1/8 SBR FLANGE TYTE FF GSKT NSF61 APPROVED EA 94.94 2,278.56 1440 16" FLG BOLT KIT 1450 6 16 ZINC HEX BOLT & NUT KIT EA 74.13 444.78 1460 6 16X1/8 SBR FLANGE TYTE FF GSKT NSF61 APPROVED EA 54.10 324.60 1480 12" FLG BOLT KIT 1490 4 12 ZINC PLTD HEX BOLT&NUT KIT EA 31.10 124.40 1500 4 12X1/8 SBR FLANGE TYTE FF GSKT NSF61 APPROVED EA 26.50 106.00 1520 8" FLG BOLT KIT 1530 6 8 ZINC PLTD HEX BOLT & NUT KIT EA 15.38 92.28 1540 6 8X1/8 SBR FLANGE TYTE FF GSKT NSF61 APPROVED EA 20.98 125.88 SUBTOTAL 7,720.26 Sub Total 449,760.20 Tax 0.00Total449,760.20 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN, PRICES QUOTED ARE VALID IF ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER AND PRODUCTS ARE RELEASEDBYCUSTOMERFORMANUFACTUREWITHINTHIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS QUOTATION. CORE & MAINLPRESERVESTHERIGHTTOINCREASEPRICESTOADDRESSFACTORS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS, TARIFFS, TRANSPORTATION, FUEL AND RAW MATERIAL COSTS. DELIVERY WILL COMMENCE BASED UPON MANUFACTURERLEADTIMES. ANY MATERIAL DELIVERIES DELAYED BEYOND MANUFACTURER LEAD TIMES MAY BE SUBJECT TO PRICE INCREASES AND/ORAPPLICABLESTORAGEFEES. THIS BID PROPOSAL IS CONTINGENT UPON BUYER’S ACCEPTANCE OF SELLER’S TERMSANDCONDITIONSOFSALE, AS MODIFIED FROM TIME TO TIME, WHICH CAN BE FOUND AT: h ps://coreandmain.com/TandC/ 06/03/2022 - 8:32 AM Actual taxes may vary Page 5 of 5 Bid Proposal for PASCO RES 3 - TBAILEY - JLS Bid #: 2375832 Page 205 of 318 Zone 3 Reservoir DI Pipes and Fittings Inventory Updated:6/1/2022 Pipes/Fittings Units Quantity Location 24" DI Pipe (push on joint)LF 900 Site 24" DI Pipe (field lok restrained)LF 690 Site (includes 160' of RJ pipe north of tee at Road 90 for valve) 24" Side-actuated Butterfly Valve (FLxFL)EA 1 Outlet in tank 24" Butterfly Valve (FLxRJ)EA 4 Site (at tee and cross and outside reservoir) 24" Flange Adapter (FLxRJ)EA 4 Site (either side of expansion joint, at tee, at cross) 24" Double Expansion Joint (FLxFL)EA 1 Site 24" DI 45 Bend (RJxRJ)EA 1 Site 24"x8" DI Cross (FLxFL)EA 1 Site 24" DI Tee (FLxFL)EA 2 Site, Inlet in tank 24" Long Body Sleeve (RJxRJ)EA 2 Connection to existing 24" Swing Check Valve (FLxFL)EA 1 Outlet in tank 16" Control Valve (FLxFL)EA 1 Inlet in tank 16" Flow Meter (FLxFL)EA 1 Inlet in tank 16" Butterfly Valve (FLxFL)EA 1 Inlet in tank 12" DI Tee (RJxRJ)EA 1 Overflow in foundation 12" Double Ball Expanson Joint (FLxFL)EA 1 Drain outside tank 12" Flange Adapter (FLxRJ)EA 2 Drain outside tank 12" DI Pipe (field lok restrained)LF 70 Overflow to outside tank, and to daylight at pond 12" x 8" DI Reducer (RJxRJ)LF 20 Drain under tank slab 8" Gate Valve (FLxRJ)EA 2 Site at cross 8" Gate Valve (FLxFL)EA 1 Tank drain 8" Dismantling Joint EA 1 Tank drain 8" Flange Adapter (FLxRJ)EA 1 Tank drain 8" DI Pipe (field lok restrained)LF 30 Drain in foundation 6/1/2022 J:\Data\TBI\21-0290\40 Estimate\30p Pipe and Fittings Inventory.xlsxPage 15-1 corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\TBI\21-0290\30 Specs\Technicals\15Mechanical - PipePre-Purchase.docx 5/18/22 9:16 AM 2022 RH2 Engineering, Inc. Division 15 Mechanical 15.00 GENERAL This division covers the work necessary for furnishing and installing mechanical appurtenances and accessories as described in these Specifications and shown on the Plans. Sections in these specifications titled “Common Work for . . .” shall apply to all following subsections whether directly referenced or not. 15.05 Common Work for Mechanical CSI 33 05 00] Part 1 - General Summary Provide the necessary piping, plumbing, fittings, and appurtenances to make all piping systems complete, tested, and ready for operation as specified herein and as shown on the Plans. Some fittings that are necessary for the complete piping system installation and operation may not have been shown. Provide fittings, pipe, and appurtenances necessary, whether shown on the Plans or not, to make all piping systems complete, tested, and ready for operation. Some pipe supports, thrust blocking, and tie rods are not shown on the Plans. Provide pipe supports, thrust blocking, and tie rods for pipes as required by accepted design criteria to support and restrain the loads encountered. Related Sections Division 1.81.30 Seismic Restraint and Anchorage Division 1.81.40 Pressure Ratings Division 1.81.50 Materials in Contact with Drinking Water Division 10.14.23 Panel Signage References All products in contact with drinking water to be low-lead (less than 0.25 percent) content in compliance with NSF/ANSI 372. Submittals Submittal information shall be provided to the Owner for the following items: Ductile iron pipe Ductile iron fittings PVC pipe and fittings Isolation valves Flow meters Page 207 of 318 City of Pasco Spring 2022 Zone 3 Reservoir Division 15 15-2 corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\TBI\21-0290\30 Specs\Technicals\15Mechanical - PipePre-Purchase.docx 5/18/22 9:16 AM 2022 RH2 Engineering, Inc. Level sensors Other mechanical components listed in this division or required by the Engineer Part 2 – Products Materials All valves, meters, hydrants, specialties, appurtenances, and other such mechanical and plumbing components that are of similar purpose shall be of a single manufacturer and model line. Do not “mix and match” unless specifically stated otherwise or allowed by the Engineer. The intention of this requirement is to maintain consistency across all components installed on the project for function, maintenance, aesthetics, and details of installation. 15.20 PIPE AND FITTINGS 15.21 Common Work for Pipe and Fittings CSI 33 05 00 or 40 05] Part 2 - Products Components Under no circumstance shall the fasteners be of lesser strength or higher corrosive potential than the materials being connected. If dissimilar metals are adjacent (for example: stainless steel flange connecting to ductile iron flange) a dielectric insulation kit shall be used. Fasteners for pipe and fittings: Per AWWA standards unless otherwise specified. All relevant subsections of AWWA C100, C200, and C500. All bolts and studs shall be long enough so that no less than two threads extend beyond the face of the nut. Non-submerged flange bolts to be ASTM A307 Grade A, zinc plated. Finishes For conditions other than submerged, all nuts and bolts shall be zinc plated, and suitable for above and below grade locations as required. Where above grade/exposed piping is specially coated, the connecting nuts and bolts shall be coated using the same system unless directed otherwise by the Owner. 15.22 Metal Pipe and Fittings 15.22.02 Ductile Iron Pipe and Fittings CSI 33 05 19 or 40 05 19] Part 1 - General Design Requirements Ductile iron pipe shall have thickness designed in accordance with ANSI/AWWA C150/A21.50 and shall be based on laying conditions and internal pressures to meet the requirements of Division 1.81.40 unless listed as more stringent below. The pipe thickness shall not be less than that of Class 52 pipe. Page 208 of 318 City of Pasco Spring 2022 Zone 3 Reservoir Division 15 15-3 corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\TBI\21-0290\30 Specs\Technicals\15Mechanical - PipePre-Purchase.docx 5/18/22 9:16 AM 2022 RH2 Engineering, Inc. Part 2 - Products Manufactured Units Pipe shall be cement-lined and asphaltic coated in accordance with ANSI Standard A21.4 AWWA C104) unless otherwise specified and shall conform to ANSI Standard A21.51 AWWA C151). Rubber gasket pipe joints are to be push-on-joint (Tyton) or mechanical joint (MJ) in accordance with ANSI Standard A21.11 (AWWA C-111), unless otherwise specified. Flanged joints shall conform to ANSI Standard B16.1. When requested, furnish certification from the manufacturer of the pipe and gasket being supplied that inspection and all of the specified tests have been made, and the results comply with requirements of this standard. Ductile Iron Fittings All fittings shall be ductile iron where possible. Steel fittings will not be accepted where ductile iron is called out on the plans. Ductile iron fittings shall be short-body, cement-lined, and for the pressure rating noted in Division 1.81.40. Metal thickness and manufacturing processes shall conform to applicable portions of ANSI Standards A21.20, A21.11, B16.2, and B16.4. Standard cement lining shall be in accordance with ANSI Standard A21.4 (AWWA C104). Mechanical joint (MJ), ductile iron, compact fittings 3-inches through 24-inches, and 54- inches through 64-inches shall be in accordance with AWWA C153. Flanged pipe spools shall be fabricated from minimum Class 53 wall thickness pipe and conform to ANSI/AWWA C115/A21.15 with the exception that flanges shall be fabricated from ductile iron unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. Interior shall be cement lined. Ductile iron flange (FL) fittings shall be in accordance with AWWA C110 and fabricated from ductile iron unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents with a bolt pattern to match adjacent pipe. Gasket material for flanges shall be Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR, Buna-S), neoprene, nitrile rubber (NBR, Buna-N), chlorinated butyl, or cloth-inserted rubber. Gaskets shall be full-face. Gaskets shall be a minimum -inch thick. Do not use SBR, nitrile, or neoprene in fittings used for air transport in wastewater treatment systems. Type of ends shall be specified as mechanical joint (MJ), restrained joint (RJ), plain end (PE), or flanged (FL). Finishes For above grade and exposed pipes, including those inside structures, prepare surfaces and coat the exterior per Division 9.91.13.13. Page 209 of 318 City of Pasco Spring 2022 Zone 3 Reservoir Division 15 15-4 corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\TBI\21-0290\30 Specs\Technicals\15Mechanical - PipePre-Purchase.docx 5/18/22 9:16 AM 2022 RH2 Engineering, Inc. 15.23 Non-Metal Pipe and Fittings 15.23.06 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pipe and Fittings for Gravity Sewer – Push on Joint CSI 33 05 31.11] Part 1 - General Design Requirements Pipe and fittings shall be solid green and meet the requirements of ASTM D3034 for 4-inch to 15-inch Standard Dimension Ratio (SDR) 35, and ASTM F679 PS 46 for 18-inch to 48- inch. Part 2 - Products Materials Provisions must be made for contraction and expansion at each joint with a rubber ring. The bell shall consist of an integral wall section with a solid cross-section rubber ring, factory assembled, securely locked in place to prevent displacement during assembly. Standard laying lengths shall be 20 feet and 14 feet plus or minus 1-inch. At manufacturer’s option, random lengths of not more than 15 percent of total footage of each size may be shipped in lieu of standard lengths. All fittings and accessories shall be as manufactured by the pipe supplier or approved equal and have bell and/or spigot configurations compatible with that of the pipe. 15.30 VALVES 15.31 Common Work for Valves CSI 40 05 51 or 33 14 19] Part 1 – General Design and Performance Requirements Valves noted on the Plans or in other parts of the Specifications shall meet the requirements herein. Valves shall be designed for the intended service. Valve suppliers shall review the design and certify that the valve provided in the submittal is appropriate for the application and will operate as shown and described. Any discrepancies from the design and the valves shall be brought to the Engineer’s attention during the bidding process. Valves that do not operate as specified and per normal industry standards shall be replaced or modified so that they operate within the design parameters at the Contractor’s expense. Pressure rating shall be for 90 psi working pressure and 250 psi test pressure. Page 210 of 318 City of Pasco Spring 2022 Zone 3 Reservoir Division 15 15-5 corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\TBI\21-0290\30 Specs\Technicals\15Mechanical - PipePre-Purchase.docx 5/18/22 9:16 AM 2022 RH2 Engineering, Inc. Part 2 – Products Components If shear pins are installed with any valve, the manufacturer shall certify the shear pin(s) to fail between 95 to 99 percent of the operator shaft failure torque. Provide concrete supports for operators where required, as shown on the Plans. Buried valves shall be equipped with an AWWA 2-inch wrench nut with a minimum of 10 turns required to close the valve, unless otherwise noted on the Plans. Exposed valves shall be equipped with lever actuator for valves 3 inches and smaller, or handwheel actuator for valves 4 inches and larger, unless otherwise noted on Plans. Valves located at elevations higher than 6 feet above the finished floor shall be equipped with chainwheel operator. Buried valves where the operator nut is more than 3 feet below the valve box lid shall be provided with a solid shaft valve nut extension to reach between 18-inches and 30-inches of the ground surface. Extension shall attach to the nut with a set screw. Diameter of extension shall be appropriate for the valve size and length of extension, but under no circumstances shall be less than 1 inch for 4-foot-long extension rods, or 1.25 inch for rods longer than 4 feet. Extension shall function without excessive twisting. 15.32 Isolation Valves 15.32.02 Resilient Wedge (Seat) Gate Valves CSI 40 05 61.23] Part 1 – General Design Requirements All gate valves for water lines 3 inches and larger shall be of the resilient, wedge-type, and shall meet or exceed the performance requirements of AWWA C509 or AWWA C515- Reduced-Wall, Resilient-Seated Gate Valves for Water Supply Service, unless shown otherwise. Valves shall be suitable for installation with the type and class of pipe being installed. The wedge shall be fully encapsulated with vulcanized SBR rubber or EPDM. Ends shall be flange by flange. Valve opening direction shall be counter-clockwise. Buried valves shall have non-rising stem (NRS). Non-buried valves on fire protection systems shall have outside stem and yoke (OS&Y). Other valves as shown on the plans. 15.32.03 Butterfly Valves Class 150 CSI 40 05 64.16] Part 1 – General Design Requirements Butterfly valves shall be tight-closing rubber seat type with a minimum 150 psi working pressure rating. Valves 3-inch and larger must meet full requirements of AWWA Standard C504. Valves smaller than 3-inch shall be high performance valves specifically designed for Page 211 of 318 City of Pasco Spring 2022 Zone 3 Reservoir Division 15 15-6 corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\TBI\21-0290\30 Specs\Technicals\15Mechanical - PipePre-Purchase.docx 5/18/22 9:16 AM 2022 RH2 Engineering, Inc. shutoff and throttling control of liquids and gas. Valve components shall withstand an operator input torque of 300 foot-pounds without damage. Butterfly valves shall be constructed and adjusted as necessary to withstand a 250 psi leak tight pressure test against the closed valve seat. The valve will not be operated under test pressure. If the valve must be oriented in a particular direction to achieve the test rating, the manufacturer shall show the orientation on the valve body or provide clear directions in the submittal. If the valve requires special modifications to achieve the test pressure rating, a description of those modifications shall be provided with the submittal. Part 2 – Products Manufacturers M&H 4500 Dezurik BAW Mueller LineSeal III Pratt Groundhog (buried) or In-Plant (above grade flanged or wafer). Manufactured Units Three-inch and larger valve bodies shall be cast iron ASTM A-126 Class B or ductile iron. Provide valve disc constructed of cast iron ASTM A48 Class 40, cast iron ASTM A126 Class C, or ductile iron ASTM 536 Grade 65-45-12. The disc seating edge shall be solid stainless steel. Sprayed mating seat surfaces are not acceptable. Valves smaller than 3-inch shall have 316 stainless steel body and disc and shall be lug style. The seat shall be of acrylonitrile- butadiene or EPDM for water; or as appropriate for other services. Valve bearings shall be sleeve-type and corrosion-resistant. Valve bearings shall be of traveling nut type and shall open left. Supply valves with the valve operator on the side of the valve shown on the Plans. Provide fusion bonded epoxy or two-part liquid epoxy coating to all internal and external surfaces. 15.33 Check Valves 15.33.02 Swing Check Valves CSI 40 05 65.23] Part 1 – General Design Requirements The swing check valve shall function to permit flow in only one direction. The valve shall close tightly, without slamming, when the pressure on the discharge side exceeds the pressure on the inlet side. All swing check valves shall conform with AWWA C508 and the following specifications. Page 212 of 318 City of Pasco Spring 2022 Zone 3 Reservoir Division 15 15-7 corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\TBI\21-0290\30 Specs\Technicals\15Mechanical - PipePre-Purchase.docx 5/18/22 9:16 AM 2022 RH2 Engineering, Inc. The valve shall be constructed to withstand the pressures stated in Division 1.81.40. Flanges shall be drilled to ANSI B16.1, Class 125# or as specified in the Plans. Operating pressure range is 0 psi (low) to 100 psi (high). The manufacturer shall certify that the check valve will seal completely within the operational range. Part 2 – Products Manufacturers The valve shall be equal to Golden Anderson Fig. 220-DS swing check valve or M&H Model 159 Swing Check Valve. Valve swing arm shall be weighted. Swing arm shall be oriented as shown on the plans. If not shown, swing arm shall be located to be free to move without restriction. Manufactured Units The swing check valve body shall be constructed with heavy cast iron or cast steel and have a bronze or stainless-steel seat ring, rubber clapper facing, a non-corrosive shaft and external counterweight attachment. See Plans for which side of the valve to locate the counterweight. The valve disc shall be constructed of cast iron or cast steel and shall be suspended from a non-corrosive shaft. The valve shall allow the equivalent flow area of the adjoining pipe. The shaft shall pass through a stiffing box and be connected to the swing arm in the outside of the valve. Finishes The interior and exterior of the valve body, bonnet and seal plate shall be coated with fusion- bonded epoxy meeting AWWA C-550 (latest revision). Interior coating shall be a minimum dry film thickness of 7 Mils, not including primer. Exterior coating shall be a minimum dry film thickness of 5 Mils, not including primer. Alternatively, exterior may be coated per Division 9.91.23.1. 15.40 PIPING SPECIALTIES 15.40.02 Expansion Joint CSI 40 05 06.15 or 33 05 09.15] Part 1 – General Design Criteria All expansion joints shall be suitable for use with potable water systems if in contact with potable water. Expansion joints shall be rated by the manufacturer for the working pressure of 90 psi. Special covers shall be applied when specified in the Plans to resist weather, ozone, corrosive fumes and direct bury applications. Connections shall be as shown on the Plans flange, weld, threaded, or mechanical joint). Page 213 of 318 City of Pasco Spring 2022 Zone 3 Reservoir Division 15 15-8 corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\TBI\21-0290\30 Specs\Technicals\15Mechanical - PipePre-Purchase.docx 5/18/22 9:16 AM 2022 RH2 Engineering, Inc. Part 2 – Products Manufacturers Direct bury expansion joints shall be EBAA Iron TM Flex-Tend Double Ball standard unit expansion joints or approved equal. Non-direct bury rubber expansion joints shall be RedflexTM Type J-1 Expansion Joints as manufactured by the Red Valve Company, Inc., of Carnegie, PA, or approved equal. Manufactured Units Direct Bury Expansion joints directly buried in the ground shall be suitable to external service conditions, including soil overburden and contact with saturated soils. Non-Direct Bury (Vault, Above Ground or within Casing) Non-direct bury expansion joints shall be natural rubber. The ends of the expansion joint larger than 2 inches in nominal diameter shall be flanged. Expansion joints 2 inches and smaller in nominal diameter shall be slip-on, threaded, or flanged. Include retaining rings, anchoring, and extension limiting rods per the manufacturer’s recommendations. 15.40.11 Joint Restraints – Wedge Style CSI 33 05 09.34] Part 1 - General Summary This specification is for wedge-action (tooth) style restraints. This type of restraint shall not be used where the Plans or specifications require True Restrained Joints (TRJ). Other terms used for TRJ may include “Bead-locked” or “Fabricated Restrained Joints”. Performance Requirements. All naturally unrestrained joints subject to unbalanced forces shall be restrained to resist testing and operational forces. Restraints shall be rated for the maximum testing and operational pressures. Restraints shall be designed specifically for the material and purpose of the pipe and joint. Provide the quantity of restraints required for fully restraining all working and testing forces. Submittals Provide manufacturer’s information describing applicability and performance ratings. Quality Assurance The Contractor is responsible for verifying compatibility of the pipe and restraint system proposed in their bid. Page 214 of 318 City of Pasco Spring 2022 Zone 3 Reservoir Division 15 15-9 corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\TBI\21-0290\30 Specs\Technicals\15Mechanical - PipePre-Purchase.docx 5/18/22 9:16 AM 2022 RH2 Engineering, Inc. Part 2 - Products Manufacturers Mechanical Joints: EBAA Iron “Mega-Lug”, Romac “Romagrip”, or approved equals. Push-on Joints: US Pipe Field-Lok 350 (ductile iron), Ransom ReiberLok (PVC), EBAA Iron 1900 (PVC), or approved equals. If the Owner has construction standards addressing the type of restraints allowed, those standards shall take precedent over this specification unless specifically identified otherwise on the Plans. Components Set-screw type restraints are not permitted. Finishes Restraints in all buried applications, and in exposed areas when not being field coated, shall be coated at the factory with fusion bonded polyester based coating (e.g. Romac Romabond, EBAA Mega-bond, Ford Armorguard E-Coat) or approved equal. 15.50 FLOW METERS CSI 33 19 00 or 40 71 00] 15.50.05 Common Work for Flow Meters CSI 33 19 05 or 40 71 05] Part 1 - General Design Criteria Meter body and register shall have a pressure rating in accordance with Division 1.81.40. Materials, coatings, and components shall be appropriate for the fluid being measured. Meters will be installed inside a skirted reservoir with an anticipated ambient temperature range between 40- and 110-degrees Fahrenheit. Submittals Meter shall fit in the space provided on the Plans. Meters that do not fit in the space provided must be approved by the Engineer for acceptance along with the Contractor’s proposed modifications to accommodate the meter. Provide information on meter assembly, available and selected options, readout head, remote transmitter, coatings, and dimensions of all equipment. Part 2 - Products Components Each meter shall be equipped with an indicator-totalizer device. Inlet meter with Digital readout head with electronic output per Division 15.51.5 Page 215 of 318 City of Pasco Spring 2022 Zone 3 Reservoir Division 15 15-10 corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\TBI\21-0290\30 Specs\Technicals\15Mechanical - PipePre-Purchase.docx 5/18/22 9:16 AM 2022 RH2 Engineering, Inc. 15.51 Flow Meter Readout Head CSI 33 09 01, 33 19 90 or 40 71 90] 15.51.05 Digital Read Head with Electronic Output CSI 33 09 01.33, 33 19 94 or 40 71 94] Part 2 - Products Components The totalizer shall read in units of thousands of gallons. Readout shall gallons per minute (gpm) for instantaneous flow. The transmitter shall provide a contact closure (digital pulse) switch and a loop-powered current output (analog) for connection to the instrumentation system. The pulse output shall be plus or minus 2 percent of actual flow with the range specified for each meter. The current output shall be a 4-20 mA signal that represents the rate of flow through the meter. Scale the transmitter as follows: 0 gpm minimum and 10,000 gpm maximum. The current output shall be plus or minus 0.5 percent of full scale of the instrument the transmitter is controlling. Transmitter electronics shall consist of easily accessible printed circuit boards for convenient maintenance in a wall mountable NEMA 4X (standard) enclosure and connected to the transducer by cable. The meter manufacturer shall supply an unspliced cable run from the transmitter to the meter tube. Provide an enclosure with window, that does not negate the enclosure NEMA rating, for viewing the flow rate and totalizing counter on an LCD readout. The transmitter shall display flow rate in gallons per minute, totalized gallons, and an empty pipe indicator. The electronics shall be NEMA 4X rated. Output shall be 4-20 mA into 800 Ohms with an isolated ground and non-interacting zero and span adjustments. The display and output shall be user scalable for GPM, CFS, or MGD, and shall be password protected. The meter, electronics, and transmitter shall be RFI shielded to prevent interference from adjacent high noise electrical equipment such as variable frequency drives, electromagnetic starters, transformers, or transfer switches. Provide the necessary interface between remote instrumentation and the transmitter. Provide a meter with power and signal wiring as recommended by the manufacturer. Ground instrumentation shall be as recommended by the manufacturer. 15.53 Electronic Flow Meters 15.53.03 Electromagnetic Flow Meters CSI 33 19 23 or 40 71 13.13] Page 216 of 318 City of Pasco Spring 2022 Zone 3 Reservoir Division 15 15-11 corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\TBI\21-0290\30 Specs\Technicals\15Mechanical - PipePre-Purchase.docx 5/18/22 9:16 AM 2022 RH2 Engineering, Inc. Part 1 - General Related Sections 15.51.05 Digital Read Head with Electronic Output Design Requirements Provide an electromagnetic flow metering system suitable for measuring and transmitting flow rate in a full-flowing pipe. The meter shall be suitable for either horizontal or vertical mounting. The system shall operate within the accuracy required over an ambient temperature range of -10 to +120 degrees Fahrenheit and a process temperature range of +15 to +120 degrees Fahrenheit. Meter and electronics shall be rated for Class 1 Division 2 service. Performance Requirements The flow meter system shall be microprocessor based, utilizing a DC bipolar pulsed coil that automatically re-zeroes after each pulse cycle. System accuracy shall be 1 percent of actual flow rate over a fluid velocity range of 1 to 30 feet per second (fps), and within 0.01 fps for velocities less than 1 fps. Repeatability shall be 0.1 percent of full scale or better. System accuracy shall be traceable to NIST using prototype meters of the same configuration. Part 2 - Products Manufacturers The flow meter shall be Endress and Hauser Proline Promag W 400, Siemens Sitrans model FM MAG 5100W, ABB Watermaster, or approved equal. Manufactured Units The meter tube and coil shall be mounted on the pipe between ANSI B16 pipe flanges and rated for working and test pressures as indicated in Division 1.81.40. The meter tube shall be 304 or 316 stainless steel. The meter and cable connection(s) shall be capable of complete submergence without damage. The meter shall include integral grounding electrodes, or 316 stainless steel or Hastelloy C grounding rings for installation at the inlet. The manufacturer shall verify that the grounding system is appropriate for the proposed use. All wetted parts shall be 316 stainless steel. When grounding rings are used, select gaskets with an inside diameter large enough that the gasket cannot wrap over the exposed edge of the grounding ring, blocking it from the process fluid. Finishes The meter liner shall completely encapsulate all wetted areas except for electrodes. The liner shall be certified by the manufacturer as appropriate for the proposed use. The liner shall be Endress & Hauser: Hard Rubber, Polyurethane, PTFE. Siemens model 5100: Ebonite. Siemens model 3100: EPDM (drinking water). Page 217 of 318 City of Pasco Spring 2022 Zone 3 Reservoir Division 15 15-12 corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\TBI\21-0290\30 Specs\Technicals\15Mechanical - PipePre-Purchase.docx 5/18/22 9:16 AM 2022 RH2 Engineering, Inc. The meter supplier shall review the liner material specified and confirm that it is appropriate for this project fluid and process. Provide submittal information that the liner material is fully compatible with the liquid it is carrying. Page 218 of 318 0+001+00 2+00 3+004+ 00 30' PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT APPROX. 584LFof 24" DI PIPESEE DWGNO. M01 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION APPROX. 40LFof 24" RJDI PIPE N: 351226.16 E: 1966244.07, PROVIDE:1) - 24" DI 45° BEND (RJxRJ) WITHCONCRETE BLOCKING 1+00 2+00 3+ 00 WATERMAIN_24IN PROFILE 486' 490' 500' 510' 520' 486' 490' 500' 510' 520'0 LF100 LF200 LF300 LF400 LF 24" DI WATER MAINPROVIDE CONTINUOUSLYRISING SLOPE,UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED, TO AVOIDCREATINGINTERMEDIATEHIGH POINTS SJWMRJFMay 24, 2022May 25, 2022TBI21-0290Z3R-D- WATERP.DWGSHOWN WM01 624DWGNO.:DATEDESCRIPTIONREVISIONSBYREVIEWENGINEER: SAVEDATE:REVIEWED: PLOT DATE: CLIENT: FILENAME:SHEET NO.:JOB NO.:NO. 0"1" ROAD 904+005+00 6+00 7+008+ 009+0030' PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENTAPPROX. 160LF of24" RJ DI PIPEAPPROX. 136LF of24" RJ DIPIPE N: 351231.81E: 1967027. 69, PROVIDE:1) - 24" DI TEE (FLxFL) WITH CONCRETE BLOCKING 2) - 24" BUTTERFLY VALVE (FLxRJ)1) - 24" DI ADAPTER (RJxFL)WATERMAIN_ 24IN PROFILE 484' 490' 500' 510' 520' 484' 490' 500' 510'520'400LF 500LF 600LF 700LF 800LF 836LF 0.05%24" DI WATERMAINPROVIDECONTINUOUSLY RISINGSLOPE,UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED, TO AVOID CREATINGINTERMEDIATE HIGH POINTS SJWMRJFMay 25, 2022May25, 2022TBI21-0290Z3R- D-WATERP.DWGSHOWN WM02724DWGNO.: DATEDESCRIPTIONREVISIONSBYREVIEWENGINEER:SAVEDATE: REVIEWED: PLOT DATE: CLIENT:FILENAME: SHEET NO.: JOB NO.: NO.0" ROAD 90 8+009+00 10+0011+ 00 APPROX. 277LFof 24" DI PIPE N: 351096.04 E: 1967025.41, PROVIDE:1) - 24" x 8" DI CROSS ( FLxFL)2) - 8" GATE VALVE ( FLxRJ)1) - 24" DI ADAPTER ( RJxFL)1) - 24" BUTTERFLY VALVE ( FLxRJ)APPROX. 160 LFof 24" RJDI PIPE WATERMAIN_24IN PROFILE 480' 490' 500' 510' 520' 480' 490' 500' 510' 520'836 LF900 LF1000 LF1100 LF1150 LF 24" DIWATER MAINPROVIDE CONTINUOUSLY RISING SLOPE,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, TO AVOID CREATING INTERMEDIATEHIGH POINTS SJWMRJFMay 25, 2022May 25, 2022TBI21-0290Z3R-D- WATERP.DWGSHOWN WM03 824DWGNO.:DATEDESCRIPTIONREVISIONSBYREVIEWENGINEER: SAVEDATE:REVIEWED: PLOT DATE: CLIENT: FILENAME:SHEET NO.:JOB NO.:NO. 0"1" ROAD 90 14+26 12+00 13+00 14+00 SEEDETAIL XXONSHEET XX CONNECTION TOEXISTING WATERMAIN_24IN PROFILE 480' 490' 500' 510' 520' 480' 490' 500' 510' 520' 1150LF 1200LF 1300LF 1400LF 1440LF 0.05% 24" DI WATER MAIN PROVIDECONTINUOUSLYRISINGSLOPE, UNLESSOTHERWISENOTED, TOAVOID CREATINGINTERMEDIATE HIGHPOINTS SJWMRJFMay 25, 2022May 25, 2022TBI21-0290Z3R-D-WATERP. DWGSHOWN WM04 9 24DWGNO.:DATEDESCRIPTIONREVISIONSBYREVIEWENGINEER:SAVE DATE:REVIEWED:PLOT DATE: CLIENT: FILENAME: SHEET NO.: JOB NO.: NO.0" 1"2" SJWMRJFMay 26, 2022May 26, 2022TBI21-0290Z3R-D-MEC02. DWGSHOWN M01 23 24DWGNO.:DATEDESCRIPTIONREVISIONSBYREVIEWENGINEER:SAVE DATE:REVIEWED:PLOT DATE: CLIENT: FILENAME: SHEET NO.:JOB NO.: NO.0"1"2" DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN BAR MEASURES 2"SCALE:RESERVOIR MECHANICAL PLAN ANDDETAILSPRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY CITYOFPASCOZONE 3RESERVOIRPROGRESSIVE DESIGN BUILD16" CONTROL VALVE (FLxFL) 16" FLOWMETER (FLxFL) AAOUTLINE OF RESERVOIR, TYP.16" INLETPIPING, TYP. 24" BUTTERFLY VALVE (FLxFL)EXTENTS OF RESERVOIR CENTERCOLUMN APPROX. EXTENTS OF DOUBLEDOORSCOLUMN FOOTING BELOW, TYP. COLUMN BASE PLATE, TYP.STEEL PIPE COLUMN, TYP. OF 12 EQUALLYSPACED24" SWING CHECKVALVE (FLxFL)RESERVOIR SKIRT MECHANICALPLAN24" INLET/OUTLET PIPING, TYP.16" BUTTERFLYVALVE (FLxFL)24" BUTTERFLYVALVE ( FLxFL)24" FLANGE ADAPTER ( FLxRJ), TYP. OF324" DOUBLE BALL EXPANSION JOINT (FLxFL) 24" RJDIPIPE, APPROX. LENGTH 27'-7"BEND AND PIPE, SEE DWG NO.WM01FORADDITIONALINFORMATION DIELECTRIC ISOLATION AT FLANGE PER SPECIFICATIONS 12" OVERFLOWPIPING, TYP. SEE PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND STORM PLAN12" DOUBLE BALL EXPANSION JOINT (FLxFL)DIELECTRIC ISOLATION AT FLANGE PER SPECIFICATIONS B B CCEERESERVOIR FOUNDATION MECHANICALPLAN 24" OUTLET PIPING, TYP.12" DRAINPIPING, TYP. 24" DIPIPE, APPROX. LENGTH 17'-5"8" GATEVALVE (FLxMJ) 8" DI PIPE, LENGTH 1'-0"8" DI SJWMRJFMay 26, 2022May 26, 2022TBI21-0290Z3R-D-MEC03. DWGSHOWN M02 24 24DWGNO.:DATEDESCRIPTIONREVISIONSBYREVIEWENGINEER:SAVE DATE:REVIEWED:PLOT DATE: CLIENT: FILENAME: SHEET NO.:JOB NO.:NO.0"1"2"DRAWING ISFULL SCALE WHEN BAR MEASURES 2"SCALE: RESERVOIRINLET & OUTLET SECTIONPRELIMINARYPRELIMINARY CITY OF PASCOZONE 3 RESERVOIRPROGRESSIVE DESIGN BUILDINLET AND OUTLETPIPE ELEVATIONINLET PIPE ELEVATIONA B 1'-8" CL 9'-10"CL 3'- 6"6'-7"16" WELDED STAINLESS STEEL ASSEMBLY (FLxFL)24"x16" DI REDUCER (FLxFL)24"x24" DI TEE (FLxFL)CL CL 3'-4"CL 16" CONTROLVALVE ( FLxFL)24" DI 90° BEND (FLxFL)16" DISPOOL (FLxFL), LENGTH 6'-8" 16" FLOWMETER (FLxFL)16" BUTTERFLYVALVE ( FLxFL)16" DI SPOOL (FLxFL), LENGTH3'-4"16" DI 90° BEND (FLxFL)16" WELDED STLPIPE, APPROX. LENGTH 63'- 5"TO BOTTOM OF ELEVATED RESERVOIR 635. 00'INLET DISCHARGEELEVATION16" WELDEDSTLPIPE, APPROX. LENGTH 46'-11" FROM BOTTOM OFELEVATED RESERVOIR TO INLETDISCHARGE ELEVATION OUTLET PIPE ELEVATION CCL3'-0"24" WELDED STL SPOOL, APPROX. LENGTH 3'-0"24" BUTTERFLYVALVE (FLxFL) 24" SWING CHECKVALVE ( SJWMRJFMay 26, 2022May 26, 2022TBI21-0290Z3R-D-MEC04. DWGSHOWN M03 25 24DWGNO.:DATEDESCRIPTIONREVISIONSBYREVIEWENGINEER:SAVE DATE:REVIEWED:PLOT DATE: CLIENT: FILENAME: SHEETNO.: JOB NO.:NO. 0"1"2"DRAWINGIS FULL SCALEWHENBARMEASURES2" SCALE:RESERVOIROVERFLOWANDDRAINPIPE SECTIONPRELIMINARY PRELIMINARYCITY OF PASCOZONE3 RESERVOIRPROGRESSIVE DESIGN BUILDEXPANSIONJOINT 12" OVERFLOWPIPING, SEEDWG NO. C08 FORCONTINUATIONEDRAIN AND OVERFLOW PIPE ELEVATION 12" WELDEDSTL OVERFLOWASSEMBLY, APPROX. LENGTH 67'-6"2'- 0"CL 8" DI PIPE, APPROX. LENGTH 48' 663.50'OVERFLOW ELEVATION 12" DI 90° BEND (MJxMJ)RESERVOIR FLOOR EXTENTS OFRESERVOIR CENTER AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 24, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Zach Ratkai, Director Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: *Resolution - Acceptance of Work for Chapel Hill Park Project, Renamed Palomino Park I. REFERENCE(S): Resolution II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. ____, accepting work performed by Total Site Services, under contract for Chapel Hill Boulevard Park Project, currently known as Palomino Park. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Original Total Site Services Contract Amount: $728,006 Great Western Recreation Playground Contract Amount: $169,780 Total Payment to Total Site Services: $831,427.91 Total Payment to Great Western Recreation: $169,780 Total Approved Budget: $1,015,742 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On January 4, 2021, City Council approved the project bid and authorized the City Manager to sign the contract with Total Site Services (TSS) in the amount of $728,006, this did not include playground equipment and installation. On September 27, 2021, City Council approved supplemental funding for the project in the amount of $389,684, to update the budget to the bid amount, and account for the cost of some required change orders from TSS that occurred in the course of construction, as well as the cost of a separate contract with Great Western for the playground equipment and installation. Page 226 of 318 Final payment to TSS totaled: $829,209.74, with $38,279.00 held as retainage. Additional payments beyond initial contract amount were funded through the supplemental monies approved through Council action on September 27, 2021. The project as bid and amended is complete and the materials and workmanship meets the standards specified in the contract documents. V. DISCUSSION: Formal acceptance of public works projects are required by State law and initiate a 45-day period within which an outside vendor, supplier, or laborer has the opportunity to file a claim against this project pursuant to RCW 60.28.011(2). Upon completion of the 45-day lien filing period, retainage being held by the City may be released upon receipts of the following: An affidavit of no liens A release from the Department of Revenue that all taxes have been paid A release from any claim from the Department of Labor and Industries, pursuant to RCW 60.28.051 Staff recommends approval of the proposed Resolution accepting the work performed by Total Site Services for the Construction of the Chapel Hill Blvd Park project, currently known as Palomino Park. Page 227 of 318 Resolution – Chapel Hill Blvd. Park Project Closeout - 1 RESOLUTION NO. ____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY TOTAL SITE SERVICES, UNDER CONTRACT FOR CHAPEL HILL BLVD. PARK, CURRENTLY NAMED PALOMINO PARK, PROJECT. WHEREAS, the work performed by Total Site Services, under contract for the Chapel Hill Blvd. Park (Palomino Park) project, has been examined by City of Pasco staff and has been found to be in apparent compliance with the applicable project specifications and drawings; and WHEREAS, it is the City staff’s recommendation that the City of Pasco formally accept the contractor's work and the project as complete. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City Council concurs with the staff’s recommendation and thereby accepts the work performed by Total Site Services, under contract for the Chapel Hill Blvd. Park (Palomino Park) project, as being completed in apparent compliance with the project specifications and drawings; and Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington State Department of Revenue of this acceptance; and Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld pursuant to applicable laws, regulations and administrative determination shall be released upon satisfaction of same and verification thereof by the Administrative & Community Services Director and Finance Director. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ____ day of _____, 2022. Blanche Barajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorneys Page 228 of 318 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 1, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Dave Zabell, City Manager Executive SUBJECT: *Resolution - Ratify Emergency Order Related to COVID-19 and Conducting Public Meetings I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Resolution for Ratification of Emergency Order No. 2020-006.2 - Conducting Public Meetings II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No._____, ratifying Emergency Order No. 2020-006.2, relating to conducting public meetings. III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The purpose of emergency orders (EO) allows the City, including its businesses and community members, to continue to conduct business, ensuring that the safety of everyone is secured, while maintaining the needed services for all. To be completely effective, EOs require ratification of the City Council by resolution at their next public meeting. On March 16, 2020, then Mayor Saul Martinez proclaimed the existence of a civil emergency pursuant to the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Section 2.55.010 due to the emergency caused a world-wide pandemic, COVID-19, and City Council ratified the Mayor's proclamation through Resolution No. 3946. The EO, 2020-006 - Conducting Public Meetings, was first ratified in April 2020 based on Washington State Governor Inslee's proclamation 20-28.14, enabling public agencies, at their option and, in addition to hosting remote meeting Page 229 of 318 elements and all guidelines and requirements prescribed within Proclamation, to include an in-person meeting component. Subsequently, Governor Inslee introduced the Healthy Washington - Roadmap to Recovery Plan on January 11, 2021, which did not permit in -person public meetings until regions were in Phase 2, all regions were rolled back to Phase 1. On February 14, 2021, the South Central Region advanced to Phase 2 and City Council discussed resuming in-person Council and regulatory boards/commission meetings at their February 16, 2021 meeting seeing the move as favorable. As a result, Council ratified EO 2020 -006.1 - Conducting Public Meetings through Resolution No. 4036 on February 22, 2021. V. DISCUSSION: Governor Inslee's proclamation 20.28.14 and 20.28.15 expire on June 1, 2022 and new legislation related to the Open Public Meeting Act (OPMA), under ESHB 1329, codified many of the restrictions and requirements of the expiring Governor proclamations. Mayor Barajas extended EO 2020.006.2 - Conducting Public Meetings, on June 6, 2022 retroactive to June 1, 2022. The approval also extends the in -person meeting option to all City advisory boards and commissions. The extension of EO 2020.006 serves to ensure the City is in compliance with the new legislation. A broader discussion on City Council remote/virtual attendance is needed. City staff will review and prepare for a future discussion. Staff recommends Council ratification through the approval of the resolution as presented. Page 230 of 318 Resolution – Ratifying Emergency Order No. 2020-006.2 – Conducting Public Meetings RESOLUTION NO. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO RATIFYING THE EMERGENCY ORDER NO. 2020-006.2 RELATING TO CONDUCTING PUBLIC MEETINGS. WHEREAS, on March 16, 2020, Mayor Saul Martinez proclaimed the existence of a civil emergency pursuant to PMC 2.55.010 due to the COVID-19 emergency, which has caused a world-wide pandemic; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the emergency order allows the City, including its businesses and community members, to continue to conduct business, ensuring that the safety of everyone is secured, while maintaining the needed services for all; and WHEREAS, the Pasco Municipal Code Section 2.55.020(2) states that any such emergency) orders shall, at the next regular or special meeting of the City Council, following the date the orders are issued, be presented to the City Council for ratification and confirmation by resolution of the City Council and if not so ratified and confirmed, shall be of no further effect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City Council confirms and ratifies Emergency Order 2020-006.2 related to conducting public meetings as presented in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take retroactive effect as of June 1, 2022, at 12:00 a.m. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ____ day of _______, 2022. Blanche Barajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorneys Page 231 of 318 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR • (509) 545-3404 • FAX (509) 545-3403 P.O. Box 293 • 525 North 3rd Ave. • Pasco, WA 99301 www.pasco-wa.gov Emergency Order No. 2020-006.2 1 Emergency Order No. 2020-006.2 Conducting Public Meetings WHEREAS, on January 31, 2020, the United States Department of Public Health and Human Services Secretary, Alex Azar, declared a public emergency for the novel coronavirus COVID-19) beginning on January 27, 2020; and WHEREAS, on February 29, 2020, Governor Jay Inslee signed Proclamation No. 20-05, declaring a State of Emergency exists in all counties in the State of Washington due to the number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the State and directed that plans and procedures of the Washington State Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan be implemented; and WHEREAS, beginning on March 11, 2020, the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, directed the Federal Government to take numerous emergency measures to address the unprecedented nature of this public health crisis, including restrictions on all foreign travel outside United States of America due to the number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the United States; and WHEREAS, on March 16, 2020, Mayor Saul Martinez proclaimed the existence of a civil emergency pursuant to PMC 2.55.010; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, the Department of Public Health of Benton and Franklin County announced the first local case of COVID-19; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2020, Governor Jay Inslee signed Proclamation No. 20-25, imposing a “Stay Home – Stay Healthy” Order throughout Washington State, prohibiting all people in Washington State from leaving their homes or participating in social, spiritual, and recreational gatherings of any kind, regardless of the number of participants, and all non-essential businesses from conducting business until midnight on May 4, 2020; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2020, Governor Jay Inslee signed a Proclamation No. 20-28, waiving and suspending the portions of RCW 42.30 and RCW 42.56 that requires in-person meetings or contact during this time of social distancing; and WHEREAS, on March 29, 2020, the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, extended the social distancing guidelines for another 30 days or through April 30, 2020; and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2020, Governor Jay Inslee issued Proclamation No. 20- 28.14, enabling public agencies, at their option and, in addition to hosting remote meeting elements and all guidelines and requirements prescribed within the Proclamation, to include an in-person meeting component; and DRAFTPage 232 of 318 Emergency Order No. 2020-006.2 2 WHEREAS, on April 29, 2022, Governor Jay Inslee issued Proclamation 20-28.16, rescinding pandemic-related restrictions for the Open Public Meetings Act effective June 1, 2022; and WHEREAS, changes related to the Open Public Meetings Act through House Bill 1329, which codified many of the restrictions and requirements of Governor Jay Inslee’s Proclamation 20-28.16 necessitates adequate time for City staff to analyze, prepare, and present necessary changes for City Council discussion and direction. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Blanche Barajas, Mayor of the City of Pasco, ORDER under the emergency powers granted to me under the Proclamation of Emergency, ratified by Resolution No. 3946, that: 1. The above recitals are true and correct in all respects. 2. The City Council and its boards and commissions meetings will continue to hold their meetings remotely with meeting/webinar software that allows the public to sign into the meeting by computer, tablet, smart phone or, at a minimum, attend through a conference call-in process through their telephone. 3. The City Council regular meetings and workshops, and City boards and commissions may include an in-person component as prescribed in House Bill 1329. 4. This Order shall be effective on June 1, 2022, at 12:00 a.m. and extend for the duration of the Washington State declared state of emergency, Proclamation 20-05, as amended, unless extended or terminated by separate written order. DATED this ________ day of June 2022. Blanche Barajas, Mayor Attest: Debra Barham, CMC City Clerk DRAFTPage 233 of 318 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 31, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Utility Extension in the Unincorporated Islands & Urban Growth Area UGA) Discussion I. REFERENCE(S): Comprehensive Land Use Map with UGA Boundaries UGA Comparison Map City comment letter Spencer Estates 4 County plat application for Spencer Estates 4 Vicinity map Spencer Estates 4 Email to Franklin County Planning August 2019 Pasco proposed revisions to Franklin County Wide Planning Policies August 2019 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Providing municipal services to efficiently developed land is less of a financial burden to the general taxpayers and ratepayer than providing those same services to inefficiently developed land. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City has extended potable water to much of the unincorporated prior Urban Growth Area (UGA) both north and south of Interstate 182 (I-182). While much of the former County Riverview Area received potable water extensions many years ago, the unincorporated area north of I -182 has received potable City water more recently. For example, the unincorporated UGA area north of Burns Road and west of Broadmoor has received City water within the last decade through developer agreements with the City. Page 234 of 318 With the recent adoption of the 2021 Comprehensive Plan and expanded UGA, staff has brought to Council a proposed policy for utility extension that would require extension of sanitary sewer as well as other roadway improvements considerate of properties within the City limits or soon to be annexed areas in conjunction with extension of potable water in the 2008 UGA. This occurred in September of last year and was received favorably by the City Council. Finalization of a resolution has been placed on temporary hold due to an on - going lawsuit regarding extension of City potable water in the Riverview area. The developer in this most recent request has asked for extension of potable City water to Spencer Estates 4, a 21 -Lot Franklin County subdivision on 25 acres north of Burns Road, east of Shoreline Road and within the 2008 UGA. The proposed subdivision is to utilize on-site wells and septic systems for each of the one-acre lots. V. DISCUSSION: The major consequence of developing lots within the UGA in the fashion described above is sprawl, which while inexpensive to develop, is the most expensive form of development to provide with urban or municipal services. This results in a higher tax burden on all taxpayers and higher rates on all ratepayers to fund such services. Council, through the Comprehensive Plan process and in the adopted Council Goals, has placed emphasis on increasing density within the UGA, recognizing that lower density development on large lots is expensive and inefficient to provide with urban level services, and is inconsistent with other adopted planning goals and policies. To that end, the Comprehensive Plan is intended to avoid sprawl by encouraging growth in areas where urban level services are available. Statewide Planning Goals encourage the following: 1. encourage urban development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner; and 2. reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low density development. UGA's by definition are areas where growth and higher densities are expected and that can be supported by cost -effective urban services. “Urban level services” specifically include, both city sewer and water. On-site septic and wells are not considered as urban level services. Past practices of allowing the extension of City water, but not sewer, into portions of our UGA has led to inefficient, low density development patterns. The amount of land required for on-site septic and wells is not conducive to achieving urban level densities. Page 235 of 318 Unlike developers constructing large scale plats, the individual homeowners of smaller parcels currently served by septic are less financially capable of adding density ofcosttheasUGArelativeofportionsunincorporatedtothe decommissioning on-site septic and extending sewer to smaller replat projects renders such extensions economically impracticable. Because the Growth Management Act requires urban growth to occur within all areas of the UGA, the legacy of these past development patterns may increase costs of urban infill projects within certain areas of our UGA. To correct these issues, the City recommends encouraging growth that will result in the phasing in of urban level services, such as sewer, when such services are capable of being provided. The draft policy, considered by Council in September of 2021, recognized three general categories of unincorporated lands within the UGA: 1. Unincorporated islands - the partiallyarea, Riverviewinprimarily developed (60%) with a domestic water system of varying adequacy throughout, on-site septic systems, substandard rights-of-way in many areas and grid system integrity hampered by proliferation of cul-de-sacs or permitted structures that block logical road extensions. There are some opportunities for development consistent with Comprehensive Plan densities. Because of the past development patterns allowed, municipal services will be challenging and costly to implement in much of this area. The burden to current tax and rate payers should be a consideration for annexations within these areas. 2. Lands within the 2008 UGA - generally there is a significant amount of development relying on on-site septic systems (1/2 acre lot density). Some opportunities remain for sanitary sewer to be provided in an efficient manner but due to development patterns, more isolated parcels would need to construct considerable off-site improvements to serve their properties. Adequacy of existing public infrastructure and burden to current rate and tax payers should be a consideration of annexations within this area. 3. Lands added as part of the current UGA - these generally offer a "clean slate" for development considerations and providing for urban level densities. Staff recommends that the City's utility extension policy in the 2008 UGA remain consistent with the guidelines outlined below: Properties within the 2008 UGA will be provided City potable water in conjunction with building permits for single family homes on existing parcels. Subdivision of existing parcels within the 2008 UGA will require extension of City sanitary sewer in conjunction with any extension of City potable Page 236 of 318 water. Development to City level standards for streets and sidewalks should be achieved through this process as well. City staff has provided Franklin County comments regarding proposed Spencer Estates 4 consistent with requests by City staff to utilize effective means for achieving urban level densities within the UGA as shown of the attached references. City staff comments for Spencer Estates 4 (dated March 17, 2022) were predicated on the plat application from the County that indicates there would be on-site wells/septic systems and the method of fire protection would be onsite underground water storage tanks. Pasco has experienced that lands developed in a sprawling fashion within the UGA, specifically with onsite septic/wells are unlikely to be annexed and contribute to challenges of using the UGA in an efficient and cost-effective way, requiring additional expansion of the UGA to meet future growth targets, or in the alternative, redevelopment within the city limits at much greater densities. The August 10, 2021 letter by City Manager Zabell, advised the developer that connection to sanitary sewer would be a condition of the provision of city - provided potable water. The May 10 letter from Caleb Stromstad, Principal Engineer of the Spencer 4 project, also attached, requests the City Council to direct the City Manager to enter into a utility extension agreement (UEA) between Big Sky Developers, the Burns family, and the City of Pasco for City water only to serve the subdivision of Spencer Estates Phase 4, located in unincorporated Franklin County. Page 237 of 318 UrbanGrowth BoundaryIndustrialIndustrialIndustrialAirport ReserveLow Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialIndustrialCommercialDNR ReserveLowDensityResidentialIndustrialDNRReserveIndustrialLowDensityResidentialCommercialAirportReserveCommercialCommercialLowDensityResidentialLowDensity ResidentialLow DensityResidentialLowDensityResidentialIndustrialLow DensityResidentialOpenSpaceParksLowDensityResidentialLowDensity ResidentialLow Density ResidentialLowDensity ResidentialLow Density ResidentialIndustrialCommercialIndustrialCommercialOpenSpaceParksIndustrialOpenSpaceParksPublicQuasi-PublicPublic Quasi-PublicLowDensityResidentialMixedUseRegionalCommercialOpenSpaceParksIndustrialLowDensityResidentialOfficeLow Density ResidentialMedium Density ResidentialLow DensityResidentialConfederatedTribes - ColvilleLowDensityResidentialLowDensityResidentialOpenSpaceParksOfficeDNRReserveMediumDensityResidentialLowDensity ResidentialLow DensityResidentialOpen SpaceParksMediumDensityResidentialDNRReserveLowDensityResidentialLowDensityResidentialPublicQuasi- PublicCommercialMediumDensityResidential Public Quasi-PublicPublic Quasi- PublicCommercial CommercialCommercialOpen SpaceParksOfficeCommercialMediumDensity ResidentialMediumDensit yResidentialLowDensity ResidentialMedium DensityResidentialMediumDensityResidentialPublicQuasi- PublicCommercialLowDensit yRe sid entialDNRReserve HighDensityResidentialCommercialMedium DensityResidentialCommercialMixedResident i alC ommer cia lPublicQuasi-PublicMediumDensityResidentialLow DensityResidentialMediumHighDensityResidentialMedium Density ResidentialOfficeMixedResidential CommercialAirport ReserveAirportReserveMixedResidentialCommercialMediumDensity Residential Medium De n sityR esidenti alMediumDensityResidentialCommercialAirportReserveLow DensityR es i dent i a lLowDensityResidentialCommerci al CommercialIndustrialCommercialMediumDensity ResidentialOpenSpaceParksCommercialCommercialCommercialAirportReserveOpenSpace ParksCommercialCommercialCommercialCommercialMediumDensityResidentialMedium Density ResidentialMixedResidentialCommercialPascoI-182EI-182WUS 12W US395NUS 12EEI182TO20THRAMPW LEWIS StE I 182TOUS395RAMPSNROAD68 TOI182RAMPWS ROAD 68 TOI182RAMPEATOUS12 RAMPEUS395 S20THTOI182 RAMPEI-182EI-182WWCOURTStUS12WUS 12 EUS395SWARGENTRdUS395N EAStROAD 68CLARKRdW AStDENT RdWSYLVESTERStNRAILRO ADAve SANDIFURPkwyWLEWISStWWERNETT RdROAD52BURNS RdBURDENBlvdROAD 44CHAPELHILLBlvdROAD48ROAD84ROAD 56N 20TH AveROAD 60WRIGLEY Old UGAI- 182EI-182 WUS12W US395NUS12EEI182TO 20TH RAMPWLEWISStEI182 TOUS395RAMPSN ROAD68TO I182 RAMPWSROAD68TO I182RAMPEA TOUS12RAMPEUS395S20TH TO I182 RAMPEI-182EI-182 WWCOURTStUS 12WUS12EUS395S WARGENTRdUS395N EAStROAD68CLARKRdWAStDENTRdWSYLVESTERStN RAILR O A DA ve SANDIFURPkwyWLEWIS StWWERNETTRdROAD52BURNSRdBURDENBlvdROAD44CHAPELHILLBlvdROAD48ROAD 84ROAD 56N 20THAveROAD60WRIGLEYDrROAD64HARRIS RdROAD 36NCOMMERCIAL AveN4THAv eROAD92IVYRdROAD96W PEARL StN14THAveBROADMOORBlvdGLADENORTHR dE FOSTERWELLSRDROAD 72WCLARK StROAD90ECRANEStMASSEYDrNCAPITOLAvePASCO KAHLOTUS RdEASY StJANET RdROAD88ROAD68NELEWISStWB StW HENRY StROAD100ALDERSONRdS10THAveN18THAveROAD34N 19THAveWBONNEVILLE StEAINSWORTHAveNOREG ONAve N22NDAveELEWISPlS ROAD40 EIRISLnE DOCK StINDUSTRIALWayKOHLERRdWELLAStN ELMAveEWAREHOUSEStROAD36 NN1STAv eDIETRICHRdROAD 111SOREG ONAv eRICHVIEW DR PIMLICODrSHORELINERdSACAJAWEAPARKRdSINAI DrE HELENA StLAREDO DrSWALLO Community Development Department PO Box 293, 525 N 3rd Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 P: 509.545.3441 / F: 509.545.3499 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 17, 2022 TO: Aaron Gunderson, Planner I FROM: Andrew Hattori, Planner I SUBJECT: Spencer Estates Phase 4 Statement from the City of Pasco: The Franklin County County-Wide Planning Policies - a requirement of the Franklin County 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan as adopted via Ordinance No 07-2021 (June 2021) contain the following: Policy III- 15 related to the “Policies for promotion of contiguous and orderly development and the provision of urban services to such development [RCW36.70A.210 (3)b]” and specifically calls out the establishment of: “joint county/city standards for development within each individual urban growth boundary, but beyond corporate limits of cities. It is in the public interest that joint standards be developed to preclude the creation of development patterns without municipal utilities and substandard infrastructure and property division that would burden the public with unnecessary costs.” The City of Pasco submitted comments to Franklin County on March 1, 2019 during public comment period of the County Wide Planning Policies, providing practical approaches to utilize the Pasco Urban Growth Area in an efficient manner, in alignment with both the Franklin County and Pasco Comprehensive Plans. Specifically, Pasco provided comments that stated development patterns without municipal services and substandard infrastructure, will compromise the ability of the UGA to accommodate the municipality’s 20 - year population forecast. Pasco provided recommendations for minimum densities with the Pasco Urban Growth Area that would satisfy the intent of the Franklin County County-Wide Planning Policies. The comments from the City of Pasco were not included in the adopted Planning Policies, and no initiation of a process to implement joint development standards has occurred. The approval of on-site wells and on-site septic systems within the adopted Pasco Urban Growth Area continue to deteriorate the ability for both Franklin County and the City of Pasco to accommodate our growth with sufficient municipal services. The Franklin County Planning and Building Department and current and future residents should be made aware that the City of Pasco will not annex lands and/or developments approved by the County Page 240 of 318 Community Development Department PO Box 293, 525 N 3rd Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 P: 509.545.3441 / F: 509.545.3499 that are not in conformance with the Goals and Policies of the Franklin County Comprehensive Plan and the City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan. The construction and/or extension of non- municipal infrastructure that cannot achieve our adopted level of service standards place an inequitable financial burden to our existing rate payers. Franklin County should be informed of the potential of significant financial liabilities in terms of infrastructure maintenance and replacement and level of service standards associated with safety/emergency response and traffic mitigation if there is a failure to conform with existing and/or new regulations ensuring future developments that provide the densities required of our Comprehensive Plans within or adjacent to the Pasco Urban Growth Area. References: Franklin County 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan Adopted June 2021 – Ordinance No 07-2021 Franklin County County-Wide Planning Policies Adopted 2019 – Resolution No 2019-312 Franklin County, Washington – Municipal Code FMC 14.10.020(a) – Purpose and intent Adopted January 2020 – Ordinance 01-2020 Fire Department 1) Franklin County Code 8.40.080- Adequate and reliable water source that can provide full fire-flow is provided to property edge. Fire hydrant and water system shall be required as follows: 2) Fire hydrants typically will be installed on alternating sides of the street on five hundred foot spacing in residential areas. Cul-de-sacs that are greater than two hundred feet in length, as measured from the main street entrance to the bulb, shall have a hydrant placed prior to the curb return entering the turnaround. Cul-de -sacs over three hundred feet shall have hydrants at the entrance and at the turnaround prior to the curb return. Hydrants shall be installed and maintained so that the hydrant has not less than a radius of forty-eight inches of clearance around the hydrant. The hydrants shall be visible within a distance of fifty feet in any direction of fire Apparatus approach. Fire hydrants shall meet local adopted standards for fire flow and duration. 3) Fire Apparatus Access Roads IFC Section 503.1. Where required. Fire Apparatus Access Roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with locally adopted street, road, and access standards. 4) Premise Identification shall be maintained or provided in accordance with IFC Section 505.1. Approved address numbers shall be placed on all buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the road or street fronting the property. Page 241 of 318 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ZONING: IS THE PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN A FLOODPLAIN? YES NO IS THE PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN AN AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY? YES NO PROPOSED SUBDIVISION NAME: PARENT LOT/PARCEL SIZE (GROSS ACREAGE): PRESENT USE OF THE LAND AND STRUCTURES, IF ANY: ARE YOU PROPOSING TO PHASE THE DEVELOPMENT? YES NO IF YES, HOW MANY PHASES ARE YOU PROPOSING AND HOW MANY YEARS UNTIL THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE FULLY BUILT- OUT? AVERAGE LOT SIZE: SMALLEST LOT SIZE: LARGEST LOT SIZE: TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS: TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPSOED DWELLING UNITS: TYPES OF BUILDINGS TO BE CONSTRUCTED (SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, COMMERCIAL, ETC.): ARE YOU PROPOSING TO INCLUDE DESIGNATED OPEN SPACES, PARKS OR RECREATIONAL AREAS? YES NO IF YES, DESCRIBE ACREAGE AND TYPES: DESCRIBE HOW STORMWATER DRAINAGE WILL BE HANDLED: ARE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING FEATURES (NATURAL OR MAN-MADE) LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY AND INCLUDE ON A SITE PLAN): PONDS LAKES STREAMS / RIVERS WETLANDS FLOODPLAIN FLOODWAY STEEP SLOPES EXCEEDS 15% GRADE) IRRIGATION DITCHES / CANALS DO YOU PROPOSE THE ON-SITE ROADWAY(S) TO BE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE? DESCRIBE ANY HOMEOWNER’S OR MAINTENANCE ASSOCATION THAT MAINTAINS ANY EXISTING PRIVATE ROADS: N/A Public Note: The floodplains limit was determined by FIRM 5300440675B provided by FEMA. Roadside swales/ditches, surface and/or subsurface infiltration Single Family 21 21 56,648 SF 43,609 SF 46,415 SF The land is presently being used for agricultural production (cherries, potatoes). Parcel: 126150142 / 25.27 Acres Spencer Estates Ph. 4 RS-20 DocuSign Envelope ID: 862D7733-78B8-4BEB-87CF-9C861DA2AD34 Page 242 of 318 3 DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED METHOD OF FIRE PREVENTION/ SUPPRESSION: ARE YOU PROPOSING SIDEWALKS? YES NO IRRIGATION SOURCE: NONE PRIVATE SCBID FCID DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY: ON-SITE WELL COMMUNITY WELL (Well ID # and location):__________________ OTHER (SPECIFY): SEWAGE DISPOSAL: ON-SITE SEPTIC OTHER (SPECIFY): LIST EXISITING OR PROPOSED UTILITY PROVIDERS: Power – Telephone – Natural Gas – Cable / Broadband – Sanitary waste disposal - I, the undersigned, hereby authorize the filing of this application and certify under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this application is complete and correct to the best of my knowledge. Further, I hereby grant Franklin County staff or representatives to enter my property during the course of this review to inspect my property as needed. This authorizes the designated Applicant’s representative (if applicable) to act on behalf of the applicant for the processing of this request. Owner Date Applicant/Representative Date Print Name:_______________________________ Print Name:________________________________ Rev. Jan 2019 Standardized onsite water storage: 20,000 GAL underground tank, meeting FCC 8.40.080 requirements Caleb Stromstad Big Sky Developers, LLC ATTN: Dave Greeno) On-site sewage system Charter, Lumen Cascade Natural Gas Corporation Charter, Lumen Franklin PUD DocuSign Envelope ID: 862D7733-78B8-4BEB-87CF-9C861DA2AD34 12/27/202112/27/2021 Page 243 of 318 FRANKLIN COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT LAND USE – ZONING CODE – BUILDING CODE – FIRE CODE – CODE ENFORCEMENT – BUSINESS REGISTRATION 502 W. BOEING ST. - PASCO, WA 99301 - [509] 545-3521 - FAX [509] 546-3367 - BURN LINE [509] 545-3586 - BLDG. INSP. LINE [509] 545-3522 WWW.CO.FRANKLIN.WA.US GENERAL LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY: ONLYONLY FILE #: Total Fees: $ Receipt #: Date of Pre- App meeting: Date deemed complete: S T A M P H E R E: Reviewed by: Hearing Date: CHECK ALL THAT APPLY AND ATTACH THE SUPPLEMENTAL FORM(S): Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Variance Rezone Non- Conforming Use Determination Zoning Interpretation / Administrative Decision Short Plat Subdivision (Long Plat) Binding Site Plan Lot Segregation Request Alteration / Vacation Planned Unit Development Other: Boundary Line Adjustment Shoreline Substantial Development Shoreline Conditional Use Permit Shoreline Variance Shoreline Exemption Shoreline Non-Conforming SEPA Environmental Checklist Appeal ( File # of the item appealed ) Critical Areas Determination / Review / Reasonable Use Exemption Temporary Use Permit Home Occupation H2A Farm Worker Housing (zoning review) for contact person: CONTACT INFORMATION Property Owner Name: Mailing Address: Phone: Email: Applicant / Agent / Contractor (ifdifferent) Company: Name: Address: Phone: Email: Surveyor / Engineer Company: Name: Address: Phone: Email: ccolre@aol.com509-521- 48345426NRoad 68, Box D-113, Pasco, WA 99301 Big Sky Developers, LLCcaleb@aqtera.com509- 845-02082705St Andrews Loop, Suite C, Pasco, WA 99301 Caleb StromstadAqtera Engineering, LLCccolre@aol.com509-521-4834 5426 N Road 68, Box D-113, Pasco, WA 99301 Dave GreenoBig BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR REQUEST: PROPERTY INFORMATION: Parcel number(s) (9-digit tax number): Legal Description of Property: Site Address (describe location if no address is assigned): All appropriate fees must accompany this application. Fees are non -refundable and subject to change. Please contact the Planning Department for current fee totals. This application, including attachments, must be completed in its entirety for all items applicable to your project. Supplemental information is generally required for land use approvals. Ensure that all required information is submitted along with this application form. If the property is owned by a corporation or LLC please attach documentation showing that the person signing as the “owner” has the authority to sign on behalf of the corporation or LLC. If there are multiple owners, provide an attachment in the same format and with the same declarations. I, the undersigned, hereby authorize the filing of this application and certify under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this application is complete and correct to the best of my knowledge. Further, I hereby grant Franklin County staff or representatives to enter my property during the course of this review to inspect my property as needed. I understand that any information submitted to the Franklin County Planning/Building Department is subject to public records disclosure laws for the State of Washington (RCW Chapter 42.17) and all other applicable laws that may require the release of the documents to the public. This authorizes the designated Applicant’s representative (if applicable) to act on behalf of the applicant for the processing of this request. Owner Date Applicant/Representative Date Print Name:_______________________________ Print Name:________________________________ Rev. Jan 2019 Big Sky Developers, LLC ATTN: Dave Greeno)Caleb Stromstad A portion of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 1, Township 9, Range 28, W.M. See Preliminary Plat Map. 126150142 Subdivide 25.3 acres from parcel 126150142 into 21 lots minimum 0.5 acre) for single family homes. Install necessary infrastructure and utilities to support development. DocuSign Envelope ID: 862D7733-78B8-4BEB-87CF-9C861DA2AD34 12/27/202112/27/2021 Page 245 of 318 Page 246 of 318 From:Rick White To:Carmen Patrick Subject:FW: CWPP material for submittal to the Franklin County Planning Commission Date:Tuesday, May 31, 2022 10:04:52 AM Attachments:Countywide Plng Policies rw version 2.25.19 (2).docx Carmen – can you please convert this email below and the WORD attachment to a pdf and send back – thank you Rick From: Rick White Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 11:14 AM To: 'Derrick Braaten' <dbraaten@co.franklin.wa.us> Subject: CWPP material for submittal to the Franklin County Planning Commission Hi Derrick – Please submit this email and the attachment to the Franklin County Planning Commission. As stated in the public notice for tonight’s hearing – I look forward to offer additional comments at the next public hearing opportunity. The attached draft of the CWPP’s is the City of Pasco’s version that was sent to County Planning on March 1st of this year. I would like to present this to the Planning Commission as I noted that Pasco’s comments in the attachment (Policy numbers #19 and #20 in red font) did not seem to be conveyed to the Commission in the latest staff report. The City requests that these policies be presented to the Planning Commission and seriously considered as a necessary approach to regional planning using the provision of municipal utilities as the main component of such a coordinated effort. As you know, the City is preparing an environmental impact statement and a significant and complicated Capital Facility element of the Pasco Comprehensive Plan to address our projected population forecast of an additional 50,000 people to the year 2038. Although the EIS is not yet released, preparing it makes it clear that business as usual will no longer suffice. The impracticality, expense and implications of ½ and 1 acre developments continuing in all alternatives of the proposed Pasco Urban Growth Area are apparent. The large lot model we have historically embraced is not sustainable and continuing that pattern will eventually place both the County and the City out of compliance with applicable growth management laws and court precedence. It is likely to prevent compliance even in this current update cycle. The City’s goal is to use density and the provision of municipal services in such a way as to densify the entire UGA; reduce the number of vehicle trips using the local and state transportation system and reduce the vehicle miles travelled per vehicle trip. Our initial traffic modeling of this approach (conducted over the past two months in conjunction with the EIS process) indicates that these are probable outcomes of draft polices #19 and #20 as noted above. It is also expected that the proposed maximum density of 1 unit per 5 acres in certain circumstances within the UGA will preserve the ability for future accommodation of the 20 year population forecast for the 20 year planning horizon. Thank you, Rick White Community and Economic Development Director City of Pasco Page 247 of 318 Franklin County Comprehensive Plan County Wide Planning Policies 2018 Update – (Draft as Preliminarily Approved by Planning Commission on May 1, 2018) Page 1 COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING POLICIES The following County-Wide Planning Policies were developed and adopted by Franklin County in coordination with Franklin County Cities to establish a framework to ensure that county and city comprehensive plans are consistent with one another as required by the Growth Management Act. I. Policies to Implement RCW 36.70A.020 1. The Comprehensive Plans of Franklin County and each of its cities therein shall be prepared and adopted with the objective to facilitate economic prosperity by accommodating growth consistent with the following: A. Urban Growth: Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in a cost efficient manner. B. Reduce Sprawl: Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development. C. Transportation: Encourage efficient multi-modal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with the comprehensive plans of Franklin County and the Cities of Pasco, Mesa, Connell and Kahlotus. The systems shall also be coordinated with Washington State Department of Transportation and the Benton-Franklin Council of Governments. {ADDITION} D. Housing: Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the Franklin County population and promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. E. Economic Development: Encourage economic development consistent with the adopted comprehensive plans. Promote economic opportunity for all residents of the county, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth. F. Property Rights: Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions. G. Permits: Applications for permits should be processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability, and through a process which provides for integrated and consolidated review. H. Natural Resource Industries: Maintain and enhance natural resource based industries including: productive agriculture (cultivation and grazing), fisheries and mineral industries. Encourage the improvement of productive agricultural lands and discourage incompatible uses. I. Open Space and Recreation: Retain useful open space and enhance recreational opportunities, conserve critical fish and wildlife habitat, increase public access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreation facilities. J. Environment: Protect the environment and enhance the region’s high quality of life, including air and water quality, and the availability of water for all uses, including potable domestic requirements. Page 248 of 318 Franklin County Comprehensive Plan County Wide Planning Policies 2018 Update – (Draft as Preliminarily Approved by Planning Commission on May 1, 2018) Page 2 K. Citizen Participation and Coordination: Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts. L. Public Facilities and Services: Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. M. Historic Preservation: Identify and encourage the preservation of land sites and structures that have historical or archaeological significance. II. Policies to Implement RCW 36.70A.110 relating to the establishment of Urban Growth Areas 2. Each city within Franklin County is included within a designated urban growth area (UGA). 3. Designated UGAs should include an amount of undeveloped area to adequately accommodate forecasted growth and development for the next 20 years. The size of the UGA should be large enough to accommodate community and essential public facilities, housing, commercial and industrial activities, and enough land to prevent inflation of land costs due to market fluctuations and limited land supplies. Further, the size of UGAs should consider the provision of open space, locations for parks and recreation, and protection of Critical Areas as well as natural barriers to development. 4. Designated urban growth areas should include those portions of the county already characterized by urban growth and having existing public infrastructure, public facilities and service capacities to serve existing and future growth. 5. Designated urban growth areas should include those areas that are within the recognized utility service areas of each city. 6. The size of urban growth areas will vary due to regional settings and should be adequate to promote-viable economic development strategies, promote choices in housing accommodations and ensure adequate lands are available for associated open spaces and public purposes. 7. Population projections used for designating urban growth areas will be based upon information provided by the Office of Financial Management (OFM). Use of the “mid” series as provided by OFM is preferred, but the Counties and Cities may determine to use different estimates ("high" or low") based on coordination and mutual agreement. A period of twenty years is the typical planning period. 8. The County shall, in consultation with the Cities, propose a population allocation for the purposes of updating Comprehensive Plan documents. The allocation shall be, based upon the most recent population distribution as indicated by the published OFM intercensal population estimates. The allocation shall be reconsidered every five years, when OFM provides a new set of projections for GMA planning, or when circumstances are found to have changed (for example, actual growth rates or permitting varies from the predicted patterns). 9. Municipalities should limit the extension of water and sewer service to area within each jurisdiction’s urban growth area. Page 249 of 318 Franklin County Comprehensive Plan County Wide Planning Policies 2018 Update – (Draft as Preliminarily Approved by Planning Commission on May 1, 2018) Page 3 10. Final development approval will continue to reside with the County for areas outside of City limits. 11. Amendments or changes to the UGA may only be processed once a year. 12. Within Urban Growth Areas, urban uses shall should be concentrated in and adjacent to existing urban services, or where they are shown on a Capital Improvement Plan to be available within six years. 13. Whenever possible, the extension of a UGA into an area of existing commercial agriculture should be avoided, and the addition of lands without existing commercial agricultural shall be prioritized. However, the availability of water rights may also factor into the selection of lands to be included into UGAs, and the availability of water rights shall be a factored in for consideration of approval. 14. When requesting UGA expansions, Cities shall should demonstrate the ability for in-fill development to occur in existing low-density areas within the City's UGA to avoid leap-frog development patterns. 15. All policies within each jurisdiction's and Franklin County’s Comprehensive Plans shall be modified to be consistent with adopted Countywide Policies. III. Policies for promotion of contiguous and orderly development and the provision of urban services to such development [RCW 36.70A.210 (3)b] 16. Joint county/city standards shall be established for development within each individual urban growth boundary, but beyond corporate limits of cities. It is in the public interest that joint standards be developed to preclude the creation of development patterns without municipal utilities and substandard infrastructure and property division that would burden the public with unnecessary costs to correct or compromise the ability of the UGA to accommodate the municipality’s 20 - year population forecast. These standards should include: A. Street locations, both major and secondary; B. Street right-of-way widths; C. Street improvement widths; D. Street improvement standards; E. Lots and blocks including special lot reservation system when public sewer concurrency cannot be provided; F. Curbs and gutters; G. Sidewalks for secondary streets; H. Road construction standards; I. Cul-de-sac, location and dimensions; J. Storm drainage facilities, quantity, quality and discharge locations; K. Street lights, conduit, fixtures, locations; L. Sewer, septic regulations, private sewer, dry sewer facilities; M. Water, pipe sizes, locations, fire flows, uniform codes; N. All building requirements; O. Subdivision and platting requirements including parks and open space; P. Collection and use of development impact fees as appropriate; Page 250 of 318 Franklin County Comprehensive Plan County Wide Planning Policies 2018 Update – (Draft as Preliminarily Approved by Planning Commission on May 1, 2018) Page 4 Q. Mobile home and manufactured home regulations as appropriate; R. Zoning ordinance: permitted uses in urban growth areas, setback, building heights, lot coverage as appropriate; 17. The availability of the full range of urban governmental services will be subject to the annexation policies of the adjacent municipality. 18. The timing of utility extensions into the urban growth area should be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan and capital facilities plan of the adjacent municipality. 19. Within the Pasco UGA there should be a minimum density achieved of at least 4 dwelling units per acre in the Low Density land use designation; at least 6 units per acre in the Mixed Residential land use designation and at least 10 units per acre in the High Density land use designation unless the underlying Comprehensive Plan Land Use designations allows greater density minimums. For those properties within the UGA and outside the Riverview area, but not yet incorporated and unserved by municipal water and sewer, the maximum density should be one dwelling unit per five acres. 20. Within the Pasco UGA the extension of the municipal water service will occur only with concurrent extension of municipal sewer service. IV. Policies for siting public facilities of a county-wide or state-wide nature, including transportation facilities of a statewide significance as defined in RCW 47.06.140 [RCW 36.70A.210(3)c] 21. When an appropriate issue arises the county and cities within, along with participation from the public shall develop a cooperative regional process to site essential public facilities of regional and statewide importance. The objective of the process shall be to ensure that such facilities are located so as to protect environmental quality, optimize access and usefulness to all jurisdictions, and equitably distribute economic benefits/burdens throughout the region or county. 22. No local comprehensive plan or development regulations will preclude the siting of essential public facilities, but standards may be generated to ensure that reasonable compatibility with other land uses can be achieved. V. Policies for county-wide transportation facilities and strategies [RCW 36.70A.210(3)d] 23. Maintain active county-city participation in the Benton Franklin Council of Governments in order to facilitate city, county, and state coordination in planning regional transportation facilities and infrastructure improvements to serve essential public facilities including Port District facilities and properties. 24. Comprehensive plans shall include, where applicable, the master plans of identified major transportation facilities such as airports, railroads, and major freight terminals and policies to ensure that they are reasonably accommodated and compatible with future surrounding land uses, in order to ensure the protection of regional transportation assets. Page 251 of 318 Franklin County Comprehensive Plan County Wide Planning Policies 2018 Update – (Draft as Preliminarily Approved by Planning Commission on May 1, 2018) Page 5 VI. Policies that consider the need for affordable housing for all economic segments of the population and parameters for its distribution [RCW 36.70A.210(3)e] 25. The housing element of each comprehensive plan shall: A. Address the manner and the extent that demand from all segments of the housing market will be met. B. Assess the ability to provide sufficient land, infrastructure and services to each housing segment including but not limited to, government assisted housing for low income families, manufactured housing, multi-family housing, migrant agricultural worker housing, and group homes. All segments of the housing market must be accommodated in appropriate numbers. 26. Individual plans should encourage regeneration of existing housing inventories. 27. To the extent possible each plan should promote the construction of affordable housing, particularly for low and moderate income segments of the population. 28. Consideration should be given to the provision of diversity in housing types to accommodate elderly, physically challenged, mentally impaired, and the special needs of the population, i.e. congregate care facilities. 29. Comprehensive plans shall consider the effects of public improvement development costs on housing, including impact fees. Allowance for exemption from impact fees for projects, which enhance housing for low and moderate income householders, should be considered. 30. Each community is encouraged to provide its fair share of housing affordable to low and moderate income households by promoting a balanced mix of diverse housing types. 31. Consideration should be given to implementing innovative regulatory strategies, which provide incentives for developers to provide housing affordable to low and moderate income households. VII. Policies for joint county and city planning within urban growth areas [RCW 36.70A.210(3)f] 32. City and county planning efforts will be coordinated within urban growth areas. 33. The county and each city shall jointly develop and implement development, land division and building standards, and coordinate permit procedures for the review and permitting of new subdivisions within Urban Growth Areas. VIII. Policies for county-wide economic development and employment [RCW 36.70A.210(3)g] 34. The comprehensive plan of the county and each city shall promote employment and economic opportunity for all citizens. 35. The provision of utilities and other supporting urban governmental services to commercial and industrial areas should be coordinated and assigned a high priority by utility purveyors and service providers. IX. Policies for the analysis of fiscal impacts [RCW 36.70A.210(3)h] 36. Construction design and placement standards for roads, intersections and streets(with provisions for storm water conveyance), sewer, water and lighting infrastructure, should be Page 252 of 318 Franklin County Comprehensive Plan County Wide Planning Policies 2018 Update – (Draft as Preliminarily Approved by Planning Commission on May 1, 2018) Page 6 determined based upon an analysis which identifies the most appropriate public expenditure over extended periods of time. Utilities should be incorporated into such analysis. 37. If communities consider the imposition of impact fees said fees should be established on the basis of identifiable development impacts. 38. Capital Improvement Plans and Land Use Plans shall should include fiscal analyses which identify the most cost effective uses of regional and local public services. 39. Support the development of public schools in areas where utilities are present or can be extended, is financially supportable at urban densities, where the extension of public infrastructure will protect health and safety, and the school locations are consistent with the analysis recommended by WAC 365-196-425(3)(b). Page 253 of 318 City Manager • (509) 545-3404 • FAX (509) 545-3403 P.O. Box 293 • 525 North 3rd Ave. • Pasco, WA 99301 www.pasco-wa.gov August 10, 2021 Caleb Stromstad, PE Aqtera Engineering 2705 Saint Andrews Loop, Suite C Pasco, WA 99301 Re: Proposed Spencer Estates 4 Project Dear Mr. Stromstad, This letter is in reference to development requirements associated with the above-referenced project. It is my understanding that there has been a request for the above-referenced development to receive potable water from the City. As you may know, the property is not inside the City limits but is within the City’s Urban Growth Area, and as such, the City is a non-exclusive provider of such utilities and as such, not legally required to provide water service. The requirements associated with the provision of City potable water to properties proposed for development are prescribed in the City’s adopted development standards and must be met. As such, the extension of sanitary sewer, extended to-and- though the development and provided to all parcels, as well as roadway and frontage improvements, are among the conditions that must be met in exchange for receiving potable water. The City is aware that other properties within this area were developed with City water using on-site septic systems for sewage disposal. In the absence of sanitary sewer facilities, several years ago, the City Council authorized the provision of potable water without requiring sewer in this area subject to a development agreement. It is my understanding that the subject parcel on which the preliminary plat of Spencer Estates 4 is proposed, is not part of that agreement. Further, in the years following the approval of the aforementioned agreement, the City, and several property owners to the south and east of the subject property, participated in a local improvement district and have invested millions of dollars to extend sanitary sewer from south of I-182 near Court Street to a point near the proposed Spencer Estates 4 project. Development conditions today are much different than when the City last allowed for potable water without sewer in this area. By law, the City is obligated to ensure parcels developed within the UGA receive urban level services. As you are aware, in extending sanitary sewer to the Spencer Estates 4 project there are a couple of developments which need to be completed for your project to be able to connect to sewer, including construction of a sewer lift station. Both of the aforementioned subdivisions are either under construction or inquires have been made for subdivision and the City is currently partnering with the Solstice project east of your proposal on development of the sewer lift station and has budgeted funds sufficient to complete the work in 2022. Page 254 of 318 Caleb Stromstad, PE Aqtera Engineering Page 2 With regard to the concern you expressed to me regarding the anticipated depth of sewer, I was able to follow up with RH2 Engineering and confirm that the depth, rim to invert, at Burns Road is estimated at approximately 18 feet, which, in our opinion, is not overly burdensome for a project the magnitude of Spencer Estates 4. In short, Spencer Estates 4 will be required to also connect to City sanitary sewer in order to receive City water service. Sincerely, Dave Zabell Encl. RH2 Correspondence w/ Map cc: Rick White – CED Director Dan Ford P.E. – City Engineer File Page 255 of 318 Page 256 of 318 Page 257 of 318 2705 St. Andrews Loop, Suite C | Pasco, WA 99301 | 509.845.0208 PHONE | info@aqtera.com EMAIL | AQTERA.COM May 10, 2022 Pasco City Council Members Dave Zabell, City Manager 525 N. Third Ave. Pasco, WA 99301 RE: Utility Extension Request: The City of Pasco, Big Sky Developers, The Burns Family Dear City Council Members and City Manager Zabell: This letter is to request the City Council provide direction to City Manager Zabell to proceed with a utility extension agreement (UEA) between Big Sky Developers, the Burns family, and the City of Pasco for City water to serve the County subdivision of Spencer Estates Ph. 4. We request specific direction for this proposal be provided at the next regular council meeting on May 16, 2022. See Exhibit A for site location. Extension of City water to serve this area and others was brought to Council in July of 2021 and the final directive was outlined in the attached letter by Mr. Zabell dated 08/10/21 (Exb E). The conditions for extension made the project financially infeasible and the ownership group elected to proceed with a 1-ac development without City water. Since that time, fire safety considerations have been raised and the matter is being reevaluated. Fire chiefs from the City of Pasco and Franklin County reviewed the new application and recommend City water be extended to better serve their firefighting needs. Big Sky Developers agrees and would prefer to build ½- ac lots in the County, served by City water as the previous three phases were constructed. Achieving the ac density is necessary for the water extension to be economically viable. We propose to follow the same terms of the Spencer Estates Ph. 3 agreement including school mitigation fees, park fees, and in addition, rebuilding the Burns Road half-street to a 20ft width using the City standard street section thickness. We believe a positive direction from Council to Staff to proceed with a UEA will directly improve Community Safety by improving fire safety for residents and Quality of Life by providing more ½-acre estate lots for the community. These lots and neighborhoods are a desire and goal for many Pasco families, and while located in the County, these future residents are still a part of our Pasco community. We appreciate your reconsideration of this proposal, attached are several maps and supporting narratives. Sincerely, Caleb Stromstad Principal Engineer Cc: Big Sky Developers, Burns Family Enclosures: Exb A-F Sincere Page 258 of 318 City Council, City Manager 05/10/2022 Page 2 Exhibit Table of Contents Exhibit A- Map of City water in County area Exhibit B- Spencer Estates Ph. 4 current 1 acre lot plan Exhibit C- Spencer Estates Ph. 4 original ½ acre lot plan Exhibit D- Agenda report and council minutes: utility extension discussion Exhibit E- Letter of explanation for extension from City Manager Zabell Exhibit F- Spencer Estates Ph. 3 UEA Page 259 of 318 APPROXIMATELY 325 AC IN THE COUNTY, SERVED BY CITY WATER, DEVELOPED TO COUNTY STANDARDS. APPROX. 40 AC REMAINING UNDEVELOPED. 12" CITY WATER MAIN STUBBED TO HERE. EXHIBIT A 1 2 4 5 6 7 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT MAP1 1SPENCER ESTATES PH. 4A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 1, TWN. 9, RGE. 28, W. M. FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON N APPLICANT:CIVILENGINEER SURVEYORBASIS OFBEARING VERTICAL DATUM SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED PROJECT INFO SITEINFORMATIONUTILITIES/ SERVICESLAND USE TABLE NVICINITYMAP PROJECT SITE NVICINITY MAP º LEGAL DESCRIPTION KEY NOTES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LEGEND GENERAL NOTES 01/10/22 DocuSign Envelope ID: E099AE42-DC2D- 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 4 6 6 8 7 9 7 9 5 4 10 APPLICANT: CIVILENGINEER SURVEYOR BASIS OFBEARING VERTICAL DATUM SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED PROJECT INFO SITE INFORMATION UTILITIES/SERVICES LAND USETABLE NVICINITYMAP PROJECT SITE A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 1, TWN. 9, RGE. 28, W.M. FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON NVICINITYMAP SPENCER ESTATES PH. 4LEGEND LEGAL DESCRIPTION KEY NOTES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 GENERAL NOTES PRELIMINARY PLAT MAP1 1 N 5/ C:ity S Wash in tc n MINUTES City Council Workshop Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, July 26, 2021 City Council Chambers & GoToWebinar CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Saul Martinez, Mayor. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Ruben Alvarado, Blanche Barajas, Craig Maloney, Saul Martinez, and David Milne. Councilmembers absent: Zahra Roach and Pete Serrano. Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Adam Lincoln, Deputy City Manager; Craig Briggs, Acting City Attorney; Jeff Briggs, Attorney; Richa Sigdel, Finance Director; Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director; Steve Worley, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Railroad Quiet Zones Presentation Mr. Worley introduced Tammy Wagner, Safety Specialist-Grade Crossing, with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Ms. Wagner delivered the presentation regarding the Railroad's Quiet Zones Policies and Procedures. Council, Ms. Wagner and staff further discussed the noise issue from train horns which included the following: The number of Quiet Zone designated railroad crossings within the City of Pasco and where they are located. How to start the process for Quiet Zone designations and overview of the costs involved. EXHIBIT D Page 263 of 318 Questions about administrative costs from the FRA for initiating a Quiet Zone. The process to update safety features for railroad crossings; Pasco would need to work with the Washington Utility Transportation Commission. The BNSF Railroad Yard exemption from a Quiet Zone designation. Utility Extension in the Unincorporated Islands&Urban Growth Area UGA) Mr. White provided a brief history of extending City utilities (water and sewer) to unincorporated areas within the City's Urban Growth Area UGA) noting some specific examples of utility connections and a recent request for potable City water from Spencer Estates Phase 4. Mr. White encouraged discussion on the overall policy for City utility extensions into the UGA, noting that the major consequence of uncoordinated/unplanned growth within the UGA will create sprawl, which is the most expensive form of development to provide with urban or municipal services and results in a higher tax burden on all taxpayers in order to fund such services. He provided a series of questions within the agenda report to help start the discussion. Council and staff discussed the policy for extending City utilities into the unincorporated areas within the UGA, which resulted in Council stating they desire to protect the current taxpayers and as new development occurs it is the responsibility of those new developments/new homeowners pay their fair share when hooking up to City utilities. A way to accomplish that is through the annexation process. They also noted that when feasible, the City should have utilities reasonably available within the UGA to enable the developers/builders/home-owners the opportunity to hook up to City utilities at the time of annexation or afterward. Resolution - Amendment No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement for the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Expansion Phase 1 with RH2 Engineering Mr. Worley provided an overview of the third amendment to the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Expansion Phase 1 Project PSA with RH2 Engineering. He also noted that there are two more phases, which will increase treatment capacity to 12 million gallons per day (MGD). Council and staff briefly discussed the proposed amendment and the increased costs for specific projects. Page 264 of 318 Resolution - Bid Rejection: Burns Road Pathway Phase 1 - Broadmoor to Road 90 Project Mr. Worley explained that both bids received for the Burns Road Pathway Phase 1 project were well over the Engineers estimate, as well as the budgeted funding available for the project and recommended that Council reject all bids for this project and a new bid process will start at a later date. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION Mr. Zabell announced that the COVID-19 testing site located at Columbia Basin College is currently performing over over 600 tests daily during this past week as the newest COIVD-19 variant is infecting the population in both Benton and Franklin Counties. Mr. Maloney encouraged staff to contact the Washington State Department of Health to continue the drive-through vaccination site as it appears that Franklin County is one of the lowest vaccinated counties in the state and the infections are on a rise. EXECUTIVE SESSION Council adjourned into Executive Session at 8:18 PM for approximately 15 minutes to establish the sales price or lease amount of real estate per RCW 42.30.110 (c) and consider acquisition of real estate per RCW 42.30.110 (b)with the City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Community& Economic Development Director and the City Attorney's Office staff. Mr. Alvarado abstained from attending the Executive Session due to a potential conflict of interest. Mayor Martinez called the meeting back to order at 8:28 PM. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:28 PM. PASSED and APPROVED this 2 day of 202! . APPROVED: ATTEST: n.._ Sau artinez, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk Page 265 of 318 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 23, 2021 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 7/26/21 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Utility Extension in the Unincorporated Islands & Urban Growth Area UGA) I. REFERENCE(S): Subdivision Vicinity Map Spencer Estates #4 Comprehensive Land Use Map with UGA Boundaries II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Providing municipal services to efficiently developed land is less of a financial burden toservicessamethoseprovidingthetaxpayersgeneraltothan inefficiently developed land. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City has extended potable water to much of the unincorporated Urban Growth Area (UGA) both north and south of Interstate 182. While much of the former County Riverview Area received potable water extensions many years ago, the unincorporated area north of I-182 has received potable city water more recently. For example, the unincorporated UGA area north of Burns Road and west of Broadmoor has received city water within the last decade. A recent request has been received to extend City potable water to a subdivision outside of the City limits but within the UGA, on the north side of Burns Road at its terminus with Shoreline Drive. This property is not part of a utility extension agreement (UEA) for water that allowed other subdivisions in this area to connect to City water. The provision of sanitary sewer at the time the aforementioned UEA was uncertain and several years from being a possibility. Since that time Page 37 of62Page266of318 the City has extended a major sanitary sewer trunk line into the Broadmoor area along Harris Road, which is currently being extended north to Burns Rd. through a local improvement district (LID). specificsiteisforrequestsubjectthatAlthoughwater - requestsstaff consideration by Council of the overall policy implications for utility extensions into the UGA. V. DISCUSSION: The major consequence of uncoordinated/unplanned growth is sprawl, which is the most expensive form of development to provide with urban or municipal services, this results in a higher tax burden on all taxpayers in order to fund such services. Council, through the Comprehensive Plan process and in the adopted Council Goals, has placed emphasis on increasing density within the UGA, recognizing that lower density development on large lots is expensive and inefficient to provide with urban level services, and is inconsistent with other adopted planning goals and policies. UGA's by definition are areas where growth and higher densities are expected and that can be supported by cost-effective urban services. Several of the policy considerations that staff is seeking input on are noted below: Annexation Should annexation be a prerequisite of extension of city provided utilities (the property and the recently expanded UGA are currently not within the City limits)? Density/Utilities Will urban densities (generally 4 to 6 units per acre) be required as a condition of a city provided utility extension agreement? Will provision of sewer be required as a condition of extension of city water ( as mentioned above, the NW Sewer LID project currently underway will provide the backbone sewer network for serving the area north of I-182)? The Growth Management Act requires that Cities phase growth in urban growth areas levelwithconcurrentservicesurbantoareassuchensurehave development and that development projects allow for urban level services to be phased in as appropriate. AccordDepartmentingtotheWashington of Commerce’s Urban Growth Area Guidebook, phasing in urban services typically Page 38 of62Page267of318 involves first constructing water, sewer, stormwater, and transportation to City standards. Later urban level services can be phased in for police, fire, libraries, and parks, as needed (Dept. of Commerce, GMA Guidebook, p. 16 (2016). If the City extends water and not sewer, eventual connection to sewer will be difficult as individual property owners will need to abandon septic and connect at greater individual cost. This could lead to a failure to phase in urban services to the City UGA, resulting in greater sprawl and inefficient use of land and City resources. Development Standards Will City development standards (road construction and design; sidewalks; street lighting; lot layout and design, etc.) apply as conditions of utility extension agreements? Mitigation Fees Will mitigation City fees apply? Applicability Will utility connection and annexation policies apply differently for areas within the expanded UGA than in the former UGA (some subdivisions are not within the expanded UGA but were already in the UGA established in 2008)? There are three categories of incorporated lands within the UGA: 1. Incorporated islands - primarily in the Riverview area, partially developed 60%), domestic water system of varying adequacy throughout, substandard rights-of-way in many areas, grid system integrity hampered by proliferation of cul-de-sacs. Some opportunities for development consistent with Comp Plan densities. Because of the development patterns allowed, municipal services will be challenging and costly to implement in much of this area. The burden to current taxpayers should be a consideration for annexations within these areas. 2. Lands within the 2008 UGA - Significant amount development relaying on on-site septic systems (1/2 acre lot density). Some opportunities remain for sanitary sewer to be provided in an efficient manner, more isolated parcels would need to construct considerable off -site improvements to serve their properties. Condition, including adequacy, of existing public infrastructure and burden to current taxpayers should be a consideration of annexations within this area. 3. Lands added as part of the current UGA - Clean slate, staff recommends that parcels within these areas not receive water without sanitary sewer and annexation to the City. Each of these categories has its own unique histories and circumstances and the implications of policy questions and current city requirements for provision of city utilities into unincorporated area will differ for each category noted above. Page 39 of62Page268of318 The site specific request, falls into category 2 above. As noted, sanitary sewer is currently being constructed northward. Beyond the LID there is a lift station the City is partnering on with a developer that will extend sewer to Burns Rd. at the Solstice subdivision (see Exhibit 1). Staff recommends Council discussion and direction on the points above and any other considerations important to this issue. Page 40 of62Page269of318 City Manager • (509) 545-3404 • FAX (509) 545-3403 P.O. Box 293 • 525 North 3rd Ave. • Pasco, WA 99301 www.pasco-wa.gov August 10, 2021 Caleb Stromstad, PE Aqtera Engineering 2705 Saint Andrews Loop, Suite C Pasco, WA 99301 Re: Proposed Spencer Estates 4 Project Dear Mr. Stromstad, This letter is in reference to development requirements associated with the above-referenced project. It is my understanding that there has been a request for the above-referenced development to receive potable water from the City. As you may know, the property is not inside the City limits but is within the City’s Urban Growth Area, and as such, the City is a non-exclusive provider of such utilities and as such, not legally required to provide water service. The requirements associated with the provision of City potable water to properties proposed for development are prescribed in the City’s adopted development standards and must be met. As such, the extension of sanitary sewer, extended to-and- though the development and provided to all parcels, as well as roadway and frontage improvements, are among the conditions that must be met in exchange for receiving potable water. The City is aware that other properties within this area were developed with City water using on-site septic systems for sewage disposal. In the absence of sanitary sewer facilities, several years ago, the City Council authorized the provision of potable water without requiring sewer in this area subject to a development agreement. It is my understanding that the subject parcel on which the preliminary plat of Spencer Estates 4 is proposed, is not part of that agreement. Further, in the years following the approval of the aforementioned agreement, the City, and several property owners to the south and east of the subject property, participated in a local improvement district and have invested millions of dollars to extend sanitary sewer from south of I-182 near Court Street to a point near the proposed Spencer Estates 4 project. Development conditions today are much different than when the City last allowed for potable water without sewer in this area. By law, the City is obligated to ensure parcels developed within the UGA receive urban level services. As you are aware, in extending sanitary sewer to the Spencer Estates 4 project there are a couple of developments which need to be completed for your project to be able to connect to sewer, including construction of a sewer lift station. Both of the aforementioned subdivisions are either under construction or inquires have been made for subdivision and the City is currently partnering with the Solstice project east of your proposal on development of the sewer lift station and has budgeted funds sufficient to complete the work in 2022. EXHIBIT E Page 270 of 318 Caleb Stromstad, PE Aqtera Engineering Page 2 With regard to the concern you expressed to me regarding the anticipated depth of sewer, I was able to follow up with RH2 Engineering and confirm that the depth, rim to invert, at Burns Road is estimated at approximately 18 feet, which, in our opinion, is not overly burdensome for a project the magnitude of Spencer Estates 4. In short, Spencer Estates 4 will be required to also connect to City sanitary sewer in order to receive City water service. Sincerely, Dave Zabell Encl. RH2 Correspondence w/ Map cc: Rick White – CED Director Dan Ford P.E. – City Engineer File Page 271 of 318 Page 272 of 318 Page 273 of 318 EXHIBIT F Page 274 of 318 Page 275 of 318 Page 276 of 318 Page 277 of 318 Page 278 of 318 Page 279 of 318 Page 280 of 318 Page 281 of 318 Page 282 of 318 Page 283 of 318 Page 284 of 318 Page 285 of 318 Page 286 of 318 Page 287 of 318 Page 288 of 318 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 1, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: *2023-2028 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan I. REFERENCE(S): 2023-2028 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan Project Maps & Descriptions PowerPoint Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: As part of the City’s effort to provide for the proper and necessary development of a functional transportation network, the City shall, as required by State law RCW 35.77.010), develop and adopt annually a Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (Six-Year TIP) with such program acting as a guide for the coordinated development of the City's transportation system. The Six -Year TIP of the City specifically sets forth those projects and programs of both City and regional significance that benefit the transportation system and promote public safety and efficient multi-modal movement. The Six-Year TIP is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and can be adopted following one or more public hearings before the City Council. Projects identified in the Six-Year TIP qualify for Federal and/or State funding. The proposed plan includes all types of multi-modal transportation projects. These projects are depicted in the attached document(s). The proposed Six- Page 289 of 318 Year TIP represents those projects that are anticipated to be needed within the next six years. Projects will be coordinated with available project funding along with associated utility projects and timing may be adjusted accordingly. Update of the Six-Year TIP and subsequent submission to the State are statutory requirements, and while our local program is not required to be fiscally constrained, the program should be realistic. The Council will see many of these projects again, incorporated with the annual Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the biennial budgeting process in the coming months. This year's TIP update includes 68 projects, 9 projects from the previous plan are complete and have been removed, with 29 new projects being added from last year’s TIP. V. DISCUSSION: The TIP update discussion will provide the opportunity for Council to clarify the goals of ensuring private development continues to mitigate its impacts to the transportation system and that multi-modal transportation continues to be a focus for both public and private projects with a greater emphasis on connectivity from an access and walkability consideration as well as from a safety response perspective. Projects costs and time-frames identified in this Six-Year TIP are to be considered estimates only and may change due to a variety of circumstances. The projects included in the TIP are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions as the plan is not financially constrained. The updated Six-Year TIP must be adopted by July 1st and then submitted to the Washington State Secretary of Transportation within 30 days of adoption as required by the RCW. This plan will be presented for the public hearing at the Council Meeting on June 20, 2022. Page 290 of 318 01/)2 ! ,! ! $! -! -! -!$$ ’-3’45"#,$* ’ 8 9* 8 ?/? 8),! -! ,! ! -! -! -!, Page 293 of 318 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ PSURYHPHQW 3ODQ9LHZ HQWUDOPage 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ PSURYHPHQW 3ODQ9LHZ DVWPage 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ PSURYHPHQW 3ODQ9LHZ 6RXWKPage 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ PSURYHPHQW 3ODQ9LHZ 1RUWKPage 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ PSURYHPHQW 3ODQ9LHZ HVWPage 2023-2028 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Project Descriptions 1 City Wide Projects: 1.01 Annual Pavement Preservation The City has implemented an annual Pavement Preservation Program to assess and maintain quality streets within the City. The program includes crack seal, overlay, and microsurfacing of city streets. 1.02 City Wide Traffic Signal Improvements (Phase 3) This project will replace obsolete signal equipment with updated signal controllers, signal equipment, optimized corridor timing plans, vehicle detection system and emergency vehicle priority system. Pedestrian access will be upgraded to meet current ADA right of way accessibility design guidelines for the signalized intersections. Central Projects: 2.01 W 'A' St/6th Ave Pedestrian Crossing This project will improve the pedestrian facilities at the intersection of W "A" Street and S 6th Avenue by installing a Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacon (RRFB) and street lighting on the west side of S 6th Avenue crossing W "A" Street. 2.02 Court St Overlay - US Hwy 395 to 20th Ave This project provides mill and overlay of Court Street between Hwy 395 to 20th Ave. 2.03 Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 1) This project will include roadway, sidewalk, and safety improvements in downtown along Lewis Street corridor between 2nd Ave and 5th Ave. This project will connect the improvements made by the Lewis St Overpass project and Peanuts Park Improvement project. This project will focus on walkability, bike access, and increasing vibrancy downtown. 2.04 Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 2) This project will include roadway, sidewalk, and safety improvements in downtown along Lewis Street corridor between 5th Ave and 10th Ave. This is a continuation of the Lewis Street Corridor Improvements (Phase 1) - 2nd Ave to 5th Ave. This project will focus on walkability, bike access, and increasing vibrancy downtown. 2.05 South 4th Ave (Festival Street Improvements) This project will adjust roadway programming and install sidewalk furnishings, lighting, street trees and landscaping to create a Festival Street on South 4th Avenue from Lewis Street to Columbia Street. This project will further enhance the completed Peanuts Park improvement project to allow for greater and more varied use of the Peanuts Park Plaza. 2.06 Sylvester St Overpass Pedestrian/Bicycle Access This project will provide a new separated pedestrian/bicycle bridge across US 395 along Sylvester Street. Page 299 of 318 2023-2028 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Project Descriptions 2 2.07 Sylvester St Safety Improvements This project will re-stripe Sylvester St from Road 54 to N 3rd Ave to three lanes. Proposed improvements include bicycle lanes, pedestrian enhancements, and intersection adjustments/improvements. 2.08 Sylvester St/US 395 NB Off-Ramp Intersection Improvements This project will install a traffic signal at the intersection of Sylvester Street and the US 395 NB Off- Ramp and include any necessary ADA improvements. 2.09 Clark St Improvements This project will adjust Clark Street roadway programming to include appropriately sized cart ways, bike lanes, sidewalk furnishings, lighting, street trees and landscaping. It will also include intersection improvements. This is currently being studied by the Downtown Masterplan. 2.10 Columbia St Improvements This project will adjust Columbia Street roadway programming to include appropriately sized cart ways, bike lanes, sidewalk furnishings, lighting, street trees and landscaping. It will also include intersection improvements. This is currently being studied by the Downtown Master Plan. East Projects: 3.01 James St Improvements This project will improve safety and pedestrian features and consolidate access. 3.02 Lewis St Overpass This project will construct a new overpass and connecting infrastructure between 2nd Ave and Oregon Ave on Lewis St to replace the existing underpass, built in 1937. 3.03 Lewis St/Heritage Blvd Intersection Improvements This project will install a traffic signal at the intersection of Lewis Street and Heritage Blvd and include any necessary ADA improvements. 3.04 Oregon Ave (SR 397) Overlay This project involves the overlay and restriping of Oregon Avenue (SR397) from the WSDOT boundary of Interstate 182 to E Ainsworth Avenue. 3.05 Traffic Analysis for US 12 This project is a traffic analysis for US 12 from the intersections of A Street to Tank Farm Road/Sacajawea Park Road. This study will be completed in a partnership with WSDOT who has requested funding. Page 300 of 318 2023-2028 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Project Descriptions 3 3.06 Rd 40 E Extension This project will extend Road 40 E, as a 3-lane industrial collector, north of A street to connect to E Lewis Place. It will include bike lanes and sidewalks. 3.07 Rainier Ave/Kartchner St Intersection Improvements This project will install a traffic signal at the intersection of Rainier Avenue and Kartchner Street at the location of the US 395 SB On/Off Ramps and include any necessary ADA improvements. 3.08 'A' St/Heritage Blvd Intersection Improvements This project will install a traffic signal at the intersection of A Street and Heritage Blvd and include any necessary ADA improvements. 3.09 Rd 40 East Pathway This project will construct a multi-use pathway along Road 40 E from East Lewis Place to Sacajawea Park. 3.10 Sacajawea Park Rd Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - WSDOT This project is state funded and will construct a multi-use pathway along Sacajawea Park Road from Road 40 to US 12. 3.11 Heritage Blvd Extension This project will extend Heritage Blvd, as a 3-lane minor arterial, south of A Street to a future east- west road (Burbank Rd). It will include a multi-use pathway on one side of the roadway and sidewalk on the other. 3.12 Cedar Ave Extension This project will extend Cedar Avenue, as a 3-lane commercial collector, south of A Street to a future east-west road (D Street). It will include bike lanes and sidewalk. 3.13 South Elm Ave Extension This project will extend South Elm Avenue, as a 3-lane commercial collector, south of A Street to a future east-west road (C Street). It will include bike lanes and sidewalk. 3.14 New Road (Burbank Rd) This project will be a new east-west orientated road (Burbank Rd) that connects S Road 40 East to extended Heritage Boulevard. It will be a 3-lane industrial collector with bike lanes and sidewalks. 3.15 New Road (East C St) This project will construct an east-west oriented road from extended South Elm Avenue to extended Heritage Boulevard. It will be a 3-lane commercial collector with bike lanes and sidewalks. Page 301 of 318 2023-2028 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Project Descriptions 4 3.16 New Road (East D St) This project will construct an east-west oriented road from extended Cedar Avenue to extended Heritage Boulevard. It will be a 3-lane commercial collector with bike lanes and sidewalks. 3.17 Sacajawea Park Rd Realignment This project will realign Sacajawea Park Road and move the connection of US 12 and Sacajawea Park Road/Tank Farm Road northwest along US 12 from its current location. It will be a 3-lane commercial collector with bike lanes and sidewalk. East B Circle will be extended to connect to the realigned Sacajawea Park Road. 3.18 US 12/Tank Farm Rd Connection This project will construct a connection between US 12 and Sacajawea Park Road/Tank Farm Road in its new crossing location. A roundabout and an overpass are both being considered at this time. 3.19 Commercial Ave Extension This project will extend Commercial Avenue, as a 3-lane industrial collector, from Venture Road to Tank Farm Road to create a frontage road along US 12. It will include bike lanes and sidewalk. South Projects: 4.01 Argent Rd Pedestrian / Bike Pathway This project will continue pedestrian and bike facilities from Road 68 to Road 70th Place. 4.02 Argent Rd/Rd 88 Pedestrian Crossing This project provides for safety improvements for pedestrians crossing Argent Road at the intersection of Road 88. The scope includes ADA ramps, pavement markings, and installation of Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacon (RRFB). 4.03 Court St/Rd 68 Intersection Improvements The project will construct a roundabout at the intersection of Road 68 and Court St as well as pedestrian improvements. 4.04 Court St Overlay - Rd 44 to Rd 68 This project provides mill and overlay of Court Street between Road 68 and Road 44. ADA upgrades will be included as needed. 4.05 Court St Safety Improvements This project reconfigures Court Street to three lanes, with one lane in each direction and a center two-way-left-turn lane and provides designated bike lanes in each direction. Page 302 of 318 2023-2028 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Project Descriptions 5 4.06 Crescent Rd Extension This project will construct an asphalt core road to extend Crescent Rd from Road 108 to Chapel Hill Blvd. A core road refers to the construction of vehicle travel lanes only without curb, gutter or sidewalk. 4.07 Franklin County Irrigation District Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway This project will construct a multi-use pathway along the piped irrigation canal from Road 100 to Road 76. 4.08 Rd 100 Widening This project will widen the Road 100 corridor to a 3-lane section from W Court St to Chapel Hill Blvd. 4.09 Sacajawea Heritage Trail Levee Lowering This project will lower the levee and install pathways for pedestrians from Road 52 to Road 72. 4.10 Rd 68 Widening This project will widen Road 68 to 5 lanes and construct a southbound right turn lane at Road 68 and Chapel Hill Boulevard North Projects: 5.01 Argent Rd Widening (Phase 3) This project is Phase 3 of urban road improvements to Argent Road from Road 36 to Varney Lane/Saraceno Way. Improvements include street widening, illumination, stormwater facilities, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and related improvements. This project has been coordinated with Columbia Basin College (CBC) and The Port of Pasco. Previous phases improved Argent Road from Varney Lane/Saraceno Way to 20th Ave and installed a signal at Road 36 and Argent Road. 5.02 Burns Rd Extension This project will extend Burns Road, as a 3-lane minor arterial, East from Road 68 to Rio Grande Lane. 5.03 Traffic Analysis for I-182/US Hwy 395 I/C This project will analyze the I-182/US 395 Interchange for improvements. 5.04 Rd 44 /Argent Rd Intersection Improvements - County Participation This project will improve the intersection of Road 44 and Argent Road and include any necessary ADA improvements. 5.05 Rd 52 Extension This project will construct a 3-lane minor arterial roadway to extend Road 52, north to Clark Road. Page 303 of 318 2023-2028 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Project Descriptions 6 5.06 Sandifur Pkwy Improvements This project will complete missing elements such as completing a 3-lane road section, curbs, and connecting sidewalks of the Sandifur Parkway road section from Road 68 to Convention Drive. 5.07 Clemente Ln Extension This project will extend Clemente Lane, as a 2 -lane commercial collector, from Wrigley Drive to Sandifur Parkway. 5.08 Rd 76 Overpass This project will extend Road 76 north from Chapel Hill Blvd to Burden Blvd by constructing an overpass across I-182 to connect communities north and south of the existing interstate. This project will include bicycle and pedestrian facilities. 5.09 Rd 76 Widening This project will construct the east side of Road 76 between Cordero Drive and Wrigley Drive, to provide a consistent road width. 5.10 Rd 68 & Burns Rd Traffic Signal This project will provide for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Road 68 and Burns Road, along with pedestrian facilities. 5.11 Traffic Analysis for I-182/Rd 68 I/C This project will analyze the I-182 and Rd 68 interchange for improvements. 5.12 Sandifur Pkwy/Rd 90 Pedestrian Crossing This project will provide for pedestrian crossing, including ADA ramps and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) and crosswalk striping. West Projects: 6.01 I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Improvements This project will add an eastbound deceleration lane and exit loop ramp from I-182 to a new roundabout at Broadmoor Blvd (Road 100). 6.02 I-182/Broadmoor Blvd I/C Multiuse Pathway/Bridge This project provides bicycle and pedestrian facilities across I-182 at Broadmoor Blvd/Road 100 through the construction of a bridge. 6.03 Broadmoor Blvd Improvements This project will widen Broadmoor Blvd to 5 lanes from I-182 Westbound Ramp to Burns Road. This project is under consideration for Tax Increment Financing (TIF). Page 304 of 318 2023-2028 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Project Descriptions 7 6.04 Buckingham Dr Extension & Signal This project will install a traffic signal at the intersection of Buckingham Drive and Broadmoor Boulevard and extend Buckingham Drive, as a 3-lane commercial collector, west of Broadmoor Boulevard to the extension of Dent Road. A portion of this project is under consideration for Tax Increment Financing (TIF). 6.05 Burns Rd/Broadmoor Blvd Intersection Improvements This project will install a traffic signal at the intersection of Burns Road and Broadmoor Blvd. Sidewalks and include any necessary ADA improvements will be included. 6.06 Burns Rd Widening This project will widen Burns Road to be a 3-lane minor arterial and include sidewalk and multi-use pathway. This project will be completed in phases in coordination with the development and the Broadmoor Master Plan. 6.07 Dent Rd Extension This project will extend Dent Road, as a 3-lane commercial collector, from Burns Road to the extension of Sandifur Parkway and install a traffic signal at Dent Road and Burns Road intersection. 6.08 Harris Rd / Crescent Rd Overpass This project will construct an overpass over I-182 to connect Harris Road and Crescent Road. 6.09 New Road 103 This project will construct a north-south oriented 2-lane neighborhood collector road from Harris Road to Burns Road. It will include street parking and sidewalks. This project will be completed in phases in coordination with development and the Broadmoor Master Plan. 6.10 New Road 105 This project will construct a north-south oriented 2-lane neighborhood collector road from Harris Road to Burns Road. It will include street parking and sidewalks. This project will be completed in phases in coordination with development and the Broadmoor Master Plan. 6.11 New Road 108 This project will construct a north-south oriented 3-lane minor arterial road from Harris Road to Burns Road. It will include a multi-use pathway and sidewalk. A portion of this project is under consideration for Tax Increment Financing (TIF). This project will be completed in phases in coordination with development and the Broadmoor Master Plan. 6.12 New Road (Bridger Rd) This project will construct an east-west oriented 2-lane neighborhood collector road from new Road 108 to new Road 103 south of Sandifur Parkway. It will include street parking and sidewalks. This project will be completed in phases in coordination with development and the Broadmoor Master Plan. Page 305 of 318 2023-2028 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Project Descriptions 8 6.13 Sandifur Pkwy Improvements & Extension This project will improve and expand Sandifur Parkway from Bedford Street to Broadmoor Boulevard and extend Sandifur from Broadmoor Boulevard to Shoreline Road. A portion of this project is under consideration for Tax Increment Financing (TIF). This project will be completed in phases in coordination with development and the Broadmoor Master Plan. 6.14 Sandifur Pkwy/Broadmoor Blvd Intersection Improvements This project will improve the intersection of Sandifur Parkway and Broadmoor Boulevard to meet the capacity and multimodal needs for future development in the Broadmoor area. This project will be completed in coordination with the Broadmoor Masterplan. 6.15 Shoreline Rd Realignment This project will realign Shoreline Road from Shoreline Court to Burns Road. Page 306 of 318 2023-2028 Transportation Improvement Plan June 6, 2022Page RCW 35.77.010 Prepare a comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six years that is: Consistent with comprehensive plan Includes bicycle and pedestrian facilities Adopted by July 1st after public hearing Filed with the secretary of transportation within 30 days of adoption Schedule 06/06/2022 – Presentation 06/20/2022 – Public Hearing and Resolution for Adoption Submission to the state with by July20thPage Projects to be completed by the end of 2022: Argent Rd Widening (Phase 1) – 20th Ave to Saraceno Way Argent Rd Widening (Phase 2) – Argent Rd & Rd 36 Intersection Improvements Burns Rd Pathway (Phase 1, 2, & 3) – Rd 100 to Rd 68 City Wide Traffic Signal Improvements (Phase 2) North Industrial Way Infiltration Retrofit & Overlay North Rd 93/Powerline Pathway (Burns Rd Pathways Ph 4) S 10th Ave /W Lewis St Advanced Intersection Warning Interstate 182 @ Road 100 – Ramp Improvement Analysis (ARR) – WSDOT Partnership Sandifur Pkwy Widening – Road 52 to Road 60 Annual Pavement Preservation 2022 68 Total Projects 29 New Projects Questions? AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 1, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 6/6/22 FROM: Dave Zabell, City Manager Executive SUBJECT: Council Appointment Process for Council Position No. 3, Voting District No. 3 I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: As Council is aware, former Councilmember Torres has resigned as City Council District #3 representative due to relocation of her official residence, leaving a vacancy on the City Council. Requirements for appointment to the vacancy are the same as election to the position. V. DISCUSSION: Staff will discuss in general the process for recruitment and appointment of the open position, Council is asked to provide input as to timing and process. Page 317 of 318 QUALITY OF LIFE Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re- investment in community infrastructure including, but not limited to: Completion of Transportation System Master Plan and design standard updates to promote greater neighborhood cohesion in new and re-developed neighborhoods through design elements, e.g.; connectivity, walkability, aesthetics, sustainability, and community gathering spaces. Completion of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan and development of an implementation strategy to enhance such services equitably across the community. • Completion of the Housing Action and Implementation Plan with a focus on a variety of housing to address the needs of the growing population. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Enhance the long-term viability, value, and service levels of services and programs, including, but not limited to: Adopting policies and strategic investment standards to assure consistency of long-range planning to include update of impact fees, area fees to specific infrastructure, and SEPA mitigation measures related to new development, e.g.; schools, traffic, parks, and fire. COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK Promote a highly functional multi-modal transportation system including, but not limited to: Application of the adopted Transportation System Master Plan including development of policies, regulations, programs, and projects that provide for greater connectivity, strategic investment, mobility, multi -modal systems, accessibility, efficiency, and safety. COMMUNITY SAFETY Promote proactive approaches for the strategic investment of infrastructure, staffing, and equipment including, but not limited to: Adoption and develop implementation strategies for Comprehensive Fire Master Plan aimed at maintaining the current Washington State Rating Bureau Class 3 community rating. Collaboration with regional partners to influence strategies to reduce incidences of homeless by leveraging existing resources such as the newly implemented 0.1% mental health sales tax, use of resource navigator programs, and other efforts. • Development of an implementation strategy for the Comprehensive Police Master Plan to support future service levels of the department to assure sustainability, public safety, officer safety, crime control, and compliance with legislative mandates. ECONOMIC VITALITY Promote and encourage economic vitality including, but not limited to: Implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan through related actions including zoning code changes, phased sign code update, and development regulations and standards. Completion of Area Master Plans and environmental analysis complementing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan such as Downtown and Broadmoor Master Plans. Development of an Economic Development Plan, including revitalization efforts. COMMUNITY IDENTITY Identify opportunities to enhance community identity, cohesion, and image including, but not limited to: Development of a Community Engagement Plan to evaluate strategies, technologies, and other opportunities to further inclusivity, community engagement, and inter-agency and constituent coordination efforts. Support of the Arts and Culture Commission in promoting unity and the celebration of diversity through art and culture programs, recognition of significant events or occurrences, and participation/sponsorship of events within the community. Page 318 of 318